HRA 08/27/1982 SPEC - 29383CITY OF FRIDLEY
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
SPECIAL MEETING
AUGUST 27, 1982
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Commers called the August 27, 1982, Housing & Redevelopment Authority
special meeting to order at 5:33 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Larry Commers, Elmars Prieditis, Carolyn Svendsen,
Duane Prairie, Walter Rasmussen
Members Absent: None
Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner
Mark Haggerty, Smith, Juster, Feikema Law Firm
Tom Berg, Miller Securities
Dennis Schneider, City Council
Bob Barnette, City Council
• CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED. 36,493 SQ. FT. OFFICE BUILDING TO BE-LOCATED-IMMEDIATELY
TO THE SOUTHEAST-OF CITY HALL
Mr. Commers asked Mr. Boardman to review the differences and changes in this
proposal as compared to the last office building proposal from Mr. Haggerty.
Mr. Boardman stated there were approximately three changes, one of which was
the most complex. Mr. Boardman stated he had underlined the major changes in
Mr. Haggerty's letter of August 20, 1982.
Mr. Boardman stated what is being proposed is that instead of purchasing the
property at 63rd & Univeristy (Mr. Gus Doty's property), they are requesting that
the HRA put up $90,000 up -front money as an investment into the project. That
money would go to pay for the issuance of the bond up to $90,000. In return for
that $90,000, the HRA will get an option on Mr. Doty's property. That option
will run until Feb. 1, 1986, one month past the option on the clinic. If at that
time, the HRA exercises its option on the property, they will pay an additional
$10,000 plus taxes, and the HRA will own the property. If the HRA doesn't
exercise the option on the property, Mr. Haggerty will pay the HRA its $90,000
investment back with interest at a 10% interest rate.
Mr. Boardman stated the partnership would be willing to pay $560 per month to
rent from the Fridley HRA the building the HRA would acquire from Mr. Haggerty
(the Madsen building just north of City Hall). Before the arrangement was they
• would remain in the building rent -free. The $560 per month is what is now being
0
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY'SPECIAL MEETING,'AUGUST-27, 1982 -' PAGE 2
netted from that property. Mr. Haggerty and the law firm would be responsible
as the master leasers of that building for all the maintenance and taxes while
renting the property, and the HRA would get the $560 per month net rent.
Mr. Boardman stated #4 in Mr. Haggerty's letter was changed to read: "The
Fridley HRA would commence construction of a plaza to be approved by the Fridley
HRA and located immediately to the west of the proposed building site during
7983." He stated they did not want to tie it down to 'a value because the HRA
hasn't yet determined what they are looking at as far as a plaza.
Mr. Boardman stated one additional change was outlined in Ill of Mr..Haggerty's
letter: "The development partnership would be willing to put up a'$10;000 non-
refundable good faith deposit which would be retained by the Fridleif the
partnership did not commence the devolb mOnt on-or' efore ec. . In t e
event that the development artnershi ' oes commence construction or ior to
Dec. 37, 1982,_ the $105000 Would " e refun'e''to-t e' eve opment partnership."
Mr. Boardman stated he had brought some bond runs to the meeting for the HRA's
review.
Mr. Commers asked what the option price works out to be on Mr. Doty's property.
Mr. Boardman stated the option price is $100,000 - -the $90,000 HRA investment plus
• the $10,000, which comes out at $3.32/sq. ft. He stated the HRA had to understand
that the option runs to 1986. Leon Madsen from the City felt the present value
on that property was justifable up to $3 /sq. ft. Looking at that over a four
year period, they have at least another 4% per year increase in values, and that
is a conservative estimate in increased values. So, over a four year period,
they are looking at an investment over $10,000.
Mr. Boardman stated they did time the length of the option on Mr. Doty's proeprty
to be one month after the option on the clinic runs out. He stated he felt very
comfortable with that because they do have the option to use that property if
they need it in negotiations for additional parking.
Mr. Boardman stated the contract documents have been prepared. They have been
partially prepared by Mr. Herrick and partially prepared by Mr. Haggerty and
himself. He stated he was now looking for some approval from the HRA of the
contract documents based on legal review and approval
Mr. Boardman asked Mr. Haggerty about the financing.
Mr. Haggerty stated Mr. Berg from Miller Securities was at the meeting. He
stated Miller Securities has given them a signed letter on the terms and conditions
Miller Securities would be willing to underwrite the project. With the proposal
as it has been presented to the HRA, they would be able to obtain the financing.
Mr. Berg stated they have been working on this project since early spring and
they have given Mr. Haggerty several letters on the terms and conditions with
which they would agree to buy the bonds and market the bonds. He stated he had
not read the contract documents, but they are willing to do a firm underwriting.
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SPECIAL MEETING, AUGUST 27, 1982 PAGE 3
i
MOTION BY MR. RASMUSSEN, SECONDED BY MR. PRIEDITIS, TO APPROVE THE "CONTRACT FOR
PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF
THE CITY OF FRIDLEY AND FRIDLEY PLAZA PARTNERSHIP," SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW BY
LEGAL COUNSEL.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Boardman stated he has another document, Resolution No. HRA 5 -1982 which is
a resolution requesting the City Council to authorize bond sales for the Center
City Redevelopment Tax Increment District Phase II. If the HRA approves the
resolution at this meeting, it would go before the City Council on Sept. 13, with
a .possible bond sale on Oct. 4. That is pretty much in line with when Mr. Haggerty
is talking about selling his bonds for the office building. If on Oct. 4,
Mr. Haggerty has not sold his bonds, then the City can delay at the City Council
level_, but they would prefer to be in the position to sell those bonds on Oct.4
and get in on the good interest rate.
MOTION BY MR. RASMUSSEN, SECONDED BY MR. PRIEDITIS, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 5 -1982,
"A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY TO
REQUEST THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL TO AUTHORIZE BOND SALES FOR THE CENTER CITY
REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT PHASE II."
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ADJOURNMENT:
Chairperson Comers declared the August 27, 1982, Housing & Redevelopment
Authority Special Meeting adjourned at 6:15 p.m.
Respectfully sub itted,
y Saba
Recording Secretary
0