HRA 04/14/1988 - 6518HOUSING $ REDEUELOPM0 T AUTHORITY
MEETING
APRIL 14, 1988 7:00 P.M.
City of Fridley
AGENDA
HOUSING & REDEVELOANENT AUTHORITY MTG. 'II uSDAY, APRIL 14, 1988 7: 00 P.M.
Location: Council Chamber (upper level)
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Housing & Redevelopment Authority Minutes: March 10, 1988
CONSIDERATION OF MOORE LAKE COMMONS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT . . . . .
. . . 1
CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR REDEVM01*ENT ASSISTANCE FOR
MIDWEST VAN BUILDING BY FRANK KITTERMAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 2 -
2 -F
CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR TRANSFER OF ANOXN COUNTY TAX
FORFEIT LOT TO ACCAP FOR URBAN HOMESTEAD . . . . . . • . . . . . . .
. . . 3 -
3-C
CONSIDERATION OF BILE FOR LAKE POINTE LAWN CARE . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 4 -
4 -C
CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSAL TO REPAIR WINTER EROSION AT LAID;
. . . 5 -
5-A
POINTE. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CONSIDERATION OF A $ 3,100.00 CHANGE ORDER FOR LAKE POINTS
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . .. 6 -
6 -E
CONSIDERATION OF GRANTING AN CASEMENT FOR NSP UNDERGROUND
POWER AT LAKE POINTE . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . 7 -
7 -A
INFORMATIONOlN LOU LUNDGREN PROPOSAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . 8 -
8 -A
INFORMATION ON H & S ASPHALT REMOBILIZATION FOR STREET
COMPLETION AT LAS POINTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . .. 9 -
9 -C
INFORMATION ON FENCE INSTALLATION AT SPRINGBROOK NATURE
. . 10
CENTER POND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
INFORMATION ON H1IdV= OFFICE BUILDING • . . . . • . . . . . . . .
. . . 11 -
11-D
CLAIMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 12 -
12 -A
OTHER BUSINESS:
QTY OF FRIMEY
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AU7HCRITY MINUTES, MARCH 10, 1988
Chairperson Commers called the March 10, 1988, Housing & Redevelopment
Authority meeting to order at 7:05 p. m.
RbLL CALL: /
Members Present: Larry Commers, Duane Prairie, John Meyer
Members Absent: Virginia Schnabel, Walter Rasmussen
Others Present: Jock Robertson, Executive Director of HRA
Rick Pribyl, City Finance Director
Julie Burt, Asst. Finance Officer
Dave Newman, BRA Attorney
Jim Casserly, 215 S. 11th St., Mpls.
Norman Brody, Brody & Associates
Lou & June Lundgren, 343 Kellogg Blvd., St. Paul
Alan Rouse, 1786 Hennepin Ave. So.
Kevin Rouse, 2200 First Bank Place East, Mpls.
Steve Billings, 5215 Lincoln St. R E.
Gerald Sunder Sunde Engineering
Jai Suh, 12 island Road, St. Paul
ApPROM OF FEBRUAM 11, 1988. HOUSING f NT Atn'HO= MINUTES:
Man by Mr. Meyer, seconded by Mr. Prairie, to approve the February 11,
1988, Housing & Redevelopment Authority minutes as written.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AyE, CHABUWSCN ODMt4ERS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UIIANI"SLY.
MOTION by Mr. Prairie, seconded by Mr. Meyer, to appove the Feb. 25, 1988,
Special Housing & Redevelopment Authority meeting minutes.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSCN COMt4ERS DECLARED THE MOTION
(TARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Robertson stated that after the special meeting on Feb. 25th, staff met
several times with Mr. Lundgren and Mr. Jacobsen to review the financing
arrangements and the pro forma. As the agenda was being prepared on March
4, three issues remained outstanding, and staff suggested an absolute
deadline of a week from March 11 to try to resolve the following three
issues:
-1-
(1) The outline Mr. Lundgren and Mr. Jacobsen presented seemed to raise some
question of an additional $1 million of financing of which both Mr.
Newman and himself had difficulty in understanding.
(2) Mr. Lundgren's pro forma which includes property tax assumptions in the
operational expense area which were one -third to one -half of what the
City Assessor estimates the taxes will be on the project.. qiven Mr.
Lundgren's values.
(3) Mr. Lundgren insists on a first option of all subsequent phases of the
Project—the elderly housing, the shopping, and the office complex.
Although that was originally understood to be part of the development
agreement, there was some question in staff's mind whether the HRA still
wants, even if all the other questions are resolved, to continue the
first option.
Mr. Robertson asked Mr. Lundgren if he wanted first option on all the rest
of the phases through calendar year 1988.
Mr. Lundgren stated, yes, on all phases except the fourth phase, the off ice
phase.
Mr. Robertson stated that, subsequently, Mr. Lundgren had said he would
prepare some comparables on the property tax questions. Those arrived on
Tuesday► March 8, and the City Assessor had looked at those numbers. Mr.
Madsen had responded on March 9, essentially disputing the conclusions Mr.
Lundgren had made. As a result, Mr. Newman and he met Wednesday afternoon
and concluded that the differences in tax dispute were a difference by a
factor of 2, Mr. Lundgren's being about half of what Mr. Madsen had come up
with. Mr. Robertson stated he then wrote a letter to Mr. Lundgren (included
in the HRA Information Packet at the meeting) essentially saying that staff
could not recommend the City proceed with this kind of discrepancy in taxes.
He delivered the letter to Mr. Lundgren at noon on Wednesday. Mr. Lundgren
met with his consultants and came back requesting an early meeting before
the HRA meeting to discuss an outline of an approach to narrow the qap. At
7:00 p.m just before the HRA meeting, they were still discussing how that
gap could be narrowed. Obviously, they still needed more time.
Mr. Confiners stated that in reading the Feb. 25th HRA minutes, he understood
that the letter of credit will still be recognized through March 25; and, if
the issues can be resolved, staff has the right to make a determination at
this point.
Mr. Newman stated that was correct. If nothing is done on the letter of
credit, then it will automatically be tendered to the HRA on March 25.
Mr. Comers asked if there was anything the HRA could do this evening, other
than to receive the information and let staff continue to negotiate with Mr.
Lundgren.
Mr. Newman stated the issue staff needs a sense of direction on was the
question pertaining to Mr. Lundgren's desire to have an option to develop
-2-
: 0 �l V ? 1 4/?4to) aIIDRI x. )4 - "X1toy w IV 12!Y-10 0 Z on v�s_i� _
the balance of the property.
Mr. Commers stated the original contract provided that Mr. Lundgren would
have those development rights, but the original contract is no longer valid.
Mr. Newman stated it was his understanding that if, in fact, staff feels the
numbers make sense and they can move forward with this and qo with the
additional 90 day period so Mr. Lundgren can make the loan application, at
that time they would be precluding any discussions with other developers on
the entire site. There seems to be some interest among developers to do
retail on some of the other portions of the site. Staff needs to know
whether the HRA feels comfortable in staff precluding the exploration of
other opportunities while Mr. Lundgren makes his loan application.
Mr. Prairie stated he felt if the first two issues could be resolved in
those 90 days, the third issue was not a great problem.
Mr. Newman stated it was the sense of staff at this point that they are
uncomfortable recommending that first option because if the first option was
granted, staff would probably effectively be precluded from developing other
parcels remaining on the site during this construction season.
Mr. Commers stated it was now March 10 and the HRA has not been approached
with any type cf formality on any other parcels. He did not see how anyone
would be able to do anything in 90 days.
Mr. Prairie agreed. He stated that for as long as this has taken, another
90 days was a pretty short period of time. Obviously, they want to have
this site developed as soon as possible.
Mr. Commers stated he felt it was the concensus of the HRA that if staff is
able to resolve the other issues that Mr. Lundgren be granted the 90 day
first right of refusal on the other parcels for further development, based
on the HRA's understanding that any negotiations would have to be completed
by March 25.
Mr. Meyer and Mr. Prairie agreed they would not have a problem with that.
Mr. Lundgren stated that if they reads satisfactory negotiations by March
25, when did the 90 days start?
Mr. Commers stated that if staff can resolve these issues satisfactorily
with Mr. Lundgren, staff had the authority to authorize Mr. Lundgren to go
ahead, and he will not have to come back before the HRA.
Mr. Lundgren stated he has felt from the beginning and he thought the HRA
felt similarly that this was a mixed use project in which there was
considerable benefit in having a unified type project, architecturally and
otherwise.
Mr. Meyer stated at the Feb. 25th special HRA meeting, Mr. Lundgren had
talked about now looking at local contractors for the project. He just
-3-
wanted Mr. Lundgren to know that he was not so concerned about who might be
building the project, but under what circumstances would the builder hold
more power to decide what goes on in the project than either Mr. Lundgren or
the HRA?
Mr. Lundgren stated he felt Mr. Meyer's present and past comments regarding
the builder were made with a great deal of justification. He stated he felt
the same way. At the present time, he was negotiating very closely and felt
that within the time frame of these negotiations, he would have finished
negotiations with Krause Anderson, a local and substantial firm. His
arrangement with them would be strictly an invitational bid situation. 7hey
would build the building for a f ixed sum per f ixed specif ications. They
would not be involved financially and they would not have any ownership in
the building.
Mr. Comers wished Mr. Lundgren good luck with these negotiations.
2. CCMIDERATION OF A MOORE UM COMMONS DEOU" ENT SGREENE m: Mr. Robertson
stated he had asked Jim Casserly to be at the meeting to answer any
questions the HRA members might have. He stated Mr. Casserly was in
agreement with the alternative proposed by staff for a $400,000 land
write -down in the development agreement. The agreement should then include
a $400,000 special assessment for public improvements over ten years with
principle and interest.
Mr. Casserly stated there was a considerable cost involved in the ponding,
relocation of storm sewers, bike paths, lighting, and irrigation systems,
all of which the developer has agreed to do, but these things are on public
right- of -ways. Lenders just are not very excited about loaning money for
those kinds of improvements, because they get no security interest for those
improvements.
Mr. Casserly stated they have had discussions with city staff and it would
certainly be helpful to the developer and help promote the project if they
could have an arrangement as has been suggested.
Mr. Newman stated staff feels that by using the special assessment approach,
it was probably a more secure way of doing it than by going through the
process of trying to place a second mortgage on the property.
Mr. Conners stated this was the basic approach the HRA had agreed upon all
along for this project in terms of using financing for the public
improvements.
Mr. Casserly stated Mr. Brody was also at the meeting to answer any
questions.
Mr. Meyer asked about the $363,000 cost for soil correction in Exhibit A,
Cost of Improvements.
Mr. Casserly stated it was his understanding that part of the problem was
there was a fair amount of concrete in there, and they think it is probably
-4-
demolition debris from the freeway interchange.
Mr. Brody stated their engineers have to do more studying and they have to
do some more soil borings to find out exactly how extensive the problem is.
He stated the $363,000 was a high end figure assuming the worst case
scenario.
Mr. Comners asked if the city had any records of what was dumped on that
site.
Mr. Robertson stated they have some partial records, but they vrould provide
to the developer whatever informaton they have on the f ill that was dumped
on the site.
Mr. Meyer asked what would happen if the best situation occurred, and the
developer only needed $100,000 for soil correction, and the HRA had already
gone ahead and authorized the $400,000?
Mr. Casserly stated what was being requested was not the $884,250, but
$400,000, so even if there were no soil corrections, there would stil be in
the neighborhood of $5001,000 of improvements the developer is willing to do.
Mr. Newman stated he would remind the HRA that this work was for both
developments --the health club and the retail. The estimated market value
was $13,200,000 wren completed. At $400,000 assistance, that works out t to
be about A-- probably a lower percentage of assistance than they provided
Vantage Companies.
Mr. Newman stated if the HRA was oomfortable with the agreement, staff will
have to sit down with the developer and prepare a development contract where
they can start dealing with some of the specifics. He would like the HRA to
make a motion indicating their approval of the concept and to direct staff
to prepare the development contract for review at the next meeting.
PION by Mr. Meyer, seconded by Mr. Prairie, to approve the concept in
terms of assistance for the Moore Lake Commons development and to authorize
staff to prepare the development contract for review at the next HRA
meeting.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYEr CHAIRPERSC N CAMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION
C KRRTED UNANIM13US1,Y.
3. CONS?DERATION OF `&INrE reW AGREEMENT` FOR LAKE POINTS DURING THE 1988
CROWING SEASON:
Mr. Robertson stated that at the Feb.
for an additional breakdown of costs.
to present his reasoning.
11th HRA meeting, the HRA had asked
He had asked Mr. Flora to do that and
Mr. Flora stated that in his February 26, 1988, memo to the HRA he was
trying to bring to the HRA's attention that as they go into these projects
(University Avenue Corridor Highway 65 causeway, Rice Creek Road parkway),,
-5-
there is a continual maintenance requirement associated with these projects
to put them on line.
Mr. Flora stated it was brought to his attention that as Lake Pointe was
coming to fruition, there was going to be the need for maintenance on the
site, and they do not have any property owners there to take care of the 40+
acres of grass, sprinkling system, debris, etc. It was beyond the City's
forces to take care of that large a parcel of land. Because the sprinkler
system was so complex, staff was suggesting they go out for a contract with
some firm to maintain the lands through the summer period.
Mr. Flora stated they really do not know what the costs are going to be.
7hey felt $25,000 was a good number to spend from April to October to have
the site maintained. Also, based upon last year's water usage and the
extension of the existing water system, they are looking at around $8,000
just for water to keep the area green. They were asking that the HRA
authorize the City to advertise for a contractor to take care of the Lake
Pointe site this summer.
Mr. Comers stated that after the HRA received Mr. Flora's memo at the last
meeting, they had a discussion relative to whether or not it might be more
appropriate or just as easy for the Public Works Department to add a couple
of temporary summer employees to cover that maintenance.
Mr. Flora stated the grass cutting alone would not be too bad. The
sprinkler system was the problem.
Mr. Commers asked if the City could get a separate sprinkler system
maintenance agreement.
Mr. Flora stated they probably could, but there could be some problems, too,
with the City and a contractor both involved. It was just a lot neater to
have cne contractor responsible for the whole area.
Mr. Prairie stated he thought it would be cheaper to have all the
maintenance done by one contractor.
Mr. Commers stated that he would like staff to get two bids - -one for
maintenance of the entire site and one for maintenance of just the
sprinkl ing system to see if there was any signif icant dif f er ence in cost s.
However, it did sound like it would probably be better to have one
contractor for all the maintenance.
Mr. Meyer stated he agreed with Mr. Flora that it would be better to have
the site maintained by the same firm. He also agreed with Mr. Commers that
it wouldn't hurt to have the City ask for two bids.
Mr. Flora stated he would be willing to break the specs down.
mar by Mr. Prairie, seconded by Mr. Meyer, to direct city staff to go out
for bids for the maintenance of the Lake Pointe site during the 1988 growing
season.
-6-
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CBAIRpERSON CGMMRS DECLARED THE MOTION
ChRRIED UNANIMWSLY.
Mr. Comers thanked Mr. Flora for coming to the meeting.
4. CONSIDERATION OF A CONTRAa WITH SUNDE ENGTW�TW TO FINISH STAMING AND-DO
CO1`'SMMON INSPECTION AT LAKE POI: ,
Mr. Flora stated Mr. Suede was requesting the BRA to extend his contract for
another $8,900 in order to complete the engineering work associated with the
Lake Pointe utilities and street system.
Mr. Gommers asked why the contract had to be extended and why the work was
not inluded in the original contract.
Mr. Suede stated that originally they had a fixed contract. Twice last year
they came in for change orders - -one in early spring and one in Sept. For
the change order in September, they tried to estimate what they thought it
would cost to completely finish the work, assuring the work would be done in
1987. However, the work was not able to be completed before winter. Mr.
Flora asked him to prepare another change order for coming back and
basically doing the work that was not done last fall.
Mr. Suede stated that for some reason the curb and storm sewer contractor
did not want to come back in until Park Construction was completely done
with their work. Scode Engineering had assumed that some of the work would
have been done concurrently, but it did not work out that way.
MOTION by Mr. Meyer, seconded by Mr. Prairie, to approve the contract with
Sonde Engineering to finish staking and do the construction inspection at
Lake Pointe, estimated cost - $8,900.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTM AYE, MIRPERBCN CON4ERS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
WOW G kOX6 OR JA We
Mr. Robertson stated the street improvements to the Lake Pointe development
site will be completed this spring. Zbe contract for these improvements was
let in 1986 and the successful law bidder was H & S Asphalt► Inc. Since the
contract was let two years ago, there have been increases in the cost of
materials.
Mr. Robertson stated that after the meeting agenda was prepared, Mr. Newman
advised him that there might be some gray legal question as to whether or
not unit prices can be changed without a rebidding of the entire contract.
Mr. Robertson stated that he had not had a chance to discuss this with Mr.
Newman before the meeting, but there was the alternative that H & S Asphalt
could exercise to continue the contract at the original bid unit prices.
Last year the HRA did pay H & S Asphalt a renobil iation fee of $2,800. If
that was still appropriate, that would be an alternative that could be
-7-
[:1
offered. Staff could see if they want to do that versus competitive
bidding.
Mr. Prairie asked if H & S Asphalt could have finished the job last year.
Mr. Surnde stated he thought if everything had gone the way they thought
things would go, H & S Asphalt would have finished. But, after the cold
spell the conditions were not very good for asphalting.
Mr. Newman stated the State Statute states that they can authorize a change
order if they are increasing quantities, providing the quantity is not
greater than 25% from the amount originally bid. The Statute does not
provide for changing unit prices through a change order as that constitutes
a substantial change. When H & S Asphalt originally bid the project the
first time, they wanted to extend the date when construction would begin.
At that time, maybe even that change constituted a substantial change f rom
the contract. Admittedly, last year the HRA did agree to mobilization
changes which was somewhat questionable but they felt there were a lot of
Problems that were not the fault of the contractor who wanted to proceed in
an expeditious fashion. However, he did not think they were facing those
kinds of restraints this year. Also, the HRA had no way of knowing if the
increases were fair and reasonable. He stated both he and Mr. Pribyl were
very uncomfortable about this.
Mr. CJoMmers stated that because of the information they had received from
their legal counsel, staff should qo back to H & S Asphalt and inform then
that there was some legal question as to whether the HRA could approve an
increase in unit pricing at this late date. If there was any other way in
which the HRA could accommodate H & S Asphalt, then staff should let the HRA
know.
MOTION by Mr. Prairie, seconded by Mr. Meyer, to table any further
discussion on the consideration of a revised contract for street completion
at Lake Pointe with H & S Asphalt until further information is received from
staff.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOr= AyE, CHAg2PERSCN CDNMERS DECLARED THE MOTION
CMRRIED UNANIMQIS[,,y.
Mr. Robertson stated the City Council had reviewed this preliminarily on
Monday, blarch 7, and the City Council had raised some questions about the
appropriateness of the housing density, considering that the traffic
improvements with Highway 65 /Central Avenue have not been scheduled yet.
Would the development, if it proceeds this construction season, cause undue
loads on the residential streets directly to the north?
Mr. Robertson stated he and Mr. Newman met with the developer, Charles Cook,
this week and suggested Mr. Cook meet with the City Council to try to
resolve these issues before proceeding any further. Essentially, he can go
with half the project under the current zoning. Mr. Cook would like to do
-8-
the whole project which would be a better project and it would have a lot
more merit for the HRA to participate in in some way.
Mr. Robertson stated that because of the questions raised by the City
Council, Mr. Cook had advised him to have this as an informational item only
for the HRA at this time. Mr. Cook will be meeting with the City Council to
try to resolve the issues raised and when those issues are resolved, he will
come back to the HRA.
Mr. Newman stated it was also e:,, :'. ained to Mr. Cook in their meeting that
the assistance he is requesting r� -cm the HRA was probably greater than what
the HRA has generally provided in the past. He believed Mr. Cook was merely
making that request in order to have a good f inn position in which to begin
his negotiations.
Mr. Commers stated there was a similar project before the HRA by 011ie
Erickson for this same property. He stated staff should get a copy of the
minutes when that project was discussed, because there were issues raised at
that time.
Mr. Robertson stated that in November staff informed the HRA of the process
whereby the flooded walkways were being replaced y bridges. dw project timer
he had told the HRA he would keep them up n date
proceeding. He stated the original budget appropriated by the HRA in
November was for $350,000, and they are still under that budget amount. He
stated he would continue to keep the REA posted of the progress.
8. CIATMS (1721 - 1730Y:
MOTION by Mr. Meyer, seconded by Mr. Prairie, to approve the check register
as presented.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VUPING AyE, aM RPERSON (]DNQ4ERS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANINDUSLY.
a. City Hall Remodeling
Mr. Meyer stated he had read a recent article in the Fridley Ebcus about
the remodeling of City Hall. He read that the City had gone the
construction manager route rather than going out for bids for a general
contractor. Did the HRA have any say in that process?
Mr. Robertson stated the HRA was involved in a meeting with the City
Council regarding the remodeling, but at that time, this was not on the
table. He stated he did inform the HRA that Boatman had suggested to
the City Council that the City go with a construction manager.
Mr. Prairie stated he wondered what reasons Boatman had for suggesting
-9-
that, because Park Construction's experience with construction managers
had not been good at all, fran the owner's standpoint.
Mr. Meyer stated he really did not understand the reasoning behind going
with a construction manager to supervise the construction. What
concerned him was that if the HRA was going to be in on the "crash
landing", they should be in on the "take -off" too. The,HRA has a
responsibility to the project in some fashion. Usually the only time a
construction manager cf a fast track situation really gains something is
when some designated dollars can be saved because a job is done 3, 4, 6
months early, and when the architect /engineers haven't started their
jobs yet and the work has to be phased.
Mr. Prairie stated that initially the reasoning sounds good, but from
his experience, it has not been good to go with a oonstruction manager.
General contractors who have been around a long time stake their
reputation on doing a good job. He did not think construction managers
had been around too long and have very little net worth. If things do
not work out, they just fold up. A general contractor and a
sub - contractor have to live with each other. 7he construction managers
can do whatever they want and it just doesn't always work. Park
Construction has not bid some jobs because a construction manager was
doing the project. And, then you do not always get the lowest price.
Mr. Commers stated staff should take these concerns, regarding a
construction manager versus a general contractor and the fact that the
HRA was not consulted before a decision was made, to the City Council
and then come back with some answers to the next HRA meeting.
Mr. Robertson stated that in order to try to finish the job as quickly
as possible because of the disruption in the operatons in the Civic
Center, it was felt it would be controlled better by having an on -site
construction supervisor representing the client and setting up the
bidding.
Mr. Meyer stated he understood what Mr. Robertson was saying but he was
still puzzled by the decision.
Mr. Robertson stated he would certainly try to take the HRA's concerns
to the City Council and bring back some answers.
Mr. Meyer stated he would like the HRA's concerns presented prior to the
signing of the oontract.
41 4 IX RR,u
MOTION by Mr. Prairie, seconded by Mr. Meyer, to adjourn the meeting. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Commers declared the March 10,
1988, Housing & Redevelopment Authority meeting adjourned at 8:49 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
LThAl Saba, Recording Secretary
-10-
OUSING and REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
1
COMMISSION MEMBERS: LAWPENCECOMMERS,CHAIRMAN
DUANE PRAIRIE VIRGINIA SCHNABEL WALTER RASMUSSEN JOHN MEYER
CITY OF FRIDLEY
10: Housing & Redevelopment Authority Members
FROM: Jock Robertson, Executive Director of HRA
DATE: April 8, 1988
RWARDING: Consideration of Moore Lake Commons Development Agreement
At your direction, staff has proceeded with negotiating development
agreements with the parcel owners (see draft in packet) . Moore Lake
Associates carries 70% of the assessment and Northwest Racquet Club carries
30%. 7he key provisions are:
L $400,000 land write down.
2. Landscaping maintenance agreement.
3. Developers guarantee reimbursement of City cost
of constructing utilities if no start of construction
�n 18 months.
Financial statements to be reviewed by HRA attorneys.
5. $1.2 mill icn total cost of public improvement
construction by HRA.
6. City provides minimum landscaping of $95,000 in Rioe
Creek Road right -of -way.
Fbllowup details and any modifications will be provided at the April 14th
meeting.
JR:ls
M -88 -7 8
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: JOCK ROBERTSON 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. (412) 571 -3450
FRIDLEY, MN 55432 EXT. 117
OUSING and REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
2
COMMISSION MEMBERS: LAWRENCE COMMERS. CHAIRMAN
DUANE PRAi:E VIRGINIA SCHNABEL WALTER RASMUSSEN JOHN MEYER I
CITY OF FRIDLEY
TO: Housing & Redevelopment Authority Members
FROM: Jock Robertson, Executive Director of HRA
DATE: April 7, 1988
REGARDING: Request for Redevelopment Assistance for MicWest Van
Building by Frank Kitterman
At their April 4, 1988, meeting, the City Council granted a special
use permit for this property and recomirended that the Housing &
Redevelopment Authority seriously consider providing assistance to
Mr. Kitterman for the redevelopment of this property. Cost estimates
are due the week of the April HRA meeting.
Staff requests authorization to negotiate a second mortgage
Development Agreement similar to that with Shorewood Inn, and also
requests HRA authorization to set a public hearing.
JR:ls
M- 88- 79
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: JOCK ROBERTSON 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. (612) 571 -3450
FRIDLEY, MN 55432 EXT. 117
Wou
PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
MEND M: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director
City Council
MW WM: Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator
MID DATE: March 31, 1988
FWARDIIG: Midwest Van and Storage Reuse
Mr. Frank Kitterman, from Advance Company, has petitioned to the City of
Fridley for a special use permit to allow a small amount of retail sales in
an industrial area and also for outside storage which would be located within
the tenced storage yard. Advance Company is involved in insurance claim
repairs to hones including mobile homes, churches and businesses. A spin otf
of the operation includes retail sales of mobile hone and RV parts. The
outside storage is for future use of the fenced storage yard for camper
sales. The item has gone to the Planning Commission and has been recommended
for approval with stipulations. The City Council will review the Special Use
Permit on April 4, 1988.
Mr. Kitterman is also requesting that the BRA consider a second mortgage for
the redevelopment of the property. Mr. Kitterman is proposing to expand the
building by adding an oft ice and new facade on the easterly side of the
building and also to upgrade on the southerly facade. These improvements
will greatly enhance the visual appeal of the building and its interface with
the neighborhood. In addition, city staff has devised a landscaping, site
improvement, and fencing plan which would also greatly improve the site. Mr.
Kitterman will be presenting his proposal to the BRA on April 14. At this
time, we have informed him that the general scenario for the loan would be
much like that which was accomplished with the Shorewood Inn property wnich
was a $70,000 loan at 98 interest over a 15 year period.
Attached for your review please find the facade plans of the proposed
redevelopment and the site plan as devised by city staff.
The plans for renovation provide the City and the neighborhood with a marked
improvement. Short -of acquisition and removal of the structure tnese plans
offer the most reasonable solution to a long standing problem.
The stipulations outlined will provide assurances for orderly and unobtrusive
operation of the storage yard (see stipulation 5 and 9 as revised).
Stipulation 9 was amended due to the petitioners concern that it may be
difficult to completely screen storage from second story view of adjacent
homes. Stipulation 4 calls for a new fence setback 10 feet from the westerly
property lire and tree plantings in this setback area to supplement fence
screening This stipulation was added after a recently received survey
revealed minimal area for plantings on the residential side of the fence.
Stipulation 11 was changed due to the petitioner having closed on the
property prix to special use permit approval.
JR:dm
Attach.
* -88-72
2 -A
2 -g
[pA/pr7nles 6875 Highway 65 NE. /'O. Box 32308 Minneapolis, MN 55432 (612) 571 -&"
N EMINEEJUM ,ff. 12203 Nlcollet Ave. So. Bu►routlle. MN 55337 16121 890.6510
CUK Mwdclpd 1 EnMonerird Enphum y • Lid wwv" • Lid M mmS • Sell D.asip
Certflieate of survey for ADVANCED COMPANIES
285 . o
.O..�: ��..� r± '�' i' �)' �!N. '.ra r...Ei:i•'jj,1.a'"w• `;a � so':�'4.i
c�. .� I'.f .0 •-a
G O
100.1 l I.Zt
�� •lr. �••
'01
t •, ; p. 1 S +ory + �.
d p
!2 story
_O A W
mod; 14.:!" _ o ' (oa I `' .13•ot
Z : � I LeAd�ny' •dxk• '� • 1 � � d
;4� �:i'.''` �'r�r'smrpl6s �rl'?t'.'° °1;� ;:. 75.0!
/ o
r I r-77 7711f
stet Cencre +e Bui1dir\9' qt.- :• 3
�V�vti
� kr
-Z85.Z1
14.88019100w.
Z0'W.
.ai
o Deno +e5 iron vnonumen+
BEARINGS
SHOWN
• a Denote5
Gonore +l✓
Deno +e5
bi +uminou5
-*- Denotes
fence lint
SCALE % I INCH= 50 FEET
3
Oo
N�
N°
1.6
C
rL
Ln
. z
O W
zQ
T
1
•
V J
•
V
so
ARE ASSUMED
LOT IJ$ BLOCK I,
u�QWai RirF f RFFK TFRRAr.F
�J
CC
Z
W
U
SP #88 -03 2 -C
tterman
AM -ROOMY is wE
ENGINEERING; INC.
ow, -- En Sur veUors
Mo*tgage Loan Survey f oar
--
�.
1 \ 4t2 'Col J
7
c- ten
Irb
L7
1 i ./ ./i / / / /L...... %/ Iii. .••.'...•.Nr{� W
�Y.IIr• I�'
f
� � � FCC.\.• :t ��s� I
1 .... �- 7•� L- -- -- - - -- - -- - —
1 \` •� '• L � li1,a o�,•. �� (�e� � i 1 r• 1r � r. � �:. moo.
a
v`•1 '� �; " ;.� �.H�R� 'Nlr lard Joe dcsu lfi !#.tofu �dl bolsm
! unfo /tan 4'o #.rite bmdmves
des d e /ttit erd td su K M&. a>q a topr+cti n P", a mar {gogt
I�d�, }JEta�, od risr�dir a�r�orl�mrnfs . �� �A1Q1 died �s
`f #.parr ir�larsl ourd by�ft /C rensa►
elm d� pIfy ad LP ter, y a a6� M� jr �° O'nUs
srxli . /,s ua�ar d sld ayread a{o m fs Iwe A07 pGrrd fo' llx �wpw qr '� �
t
SWRM ENG'NEEOAfG . INC.
,? J1�i9 ts,K`+C•Cr AQfl3..rs pru/ ,ry�s-
• r -o0
-, � � � a j w • L �000
i + 00.60,
I `
aM�a
0
�• �� �� �° � �� sots
■ ' L >rl
F
sr
SP #88 -03
Frank Kitterman
to TA
a
—MOMMOMM"M WWI—rpm
MAY 1VN"B*
',w
� j�l�lil►1 ��
! -D
SITE PLAN
g
°
�
o
• �
O
'
w
,i
B
i
! -D
SITE PLAN
0
n�
U
inn
L�J
I
SP a88-03 2— E
Frank Kitterman
SP 4688 -03 '2_F
Frank Kitterman
� r
0
s,
ELEVATION
IOUSING and REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
3
COMMISSION MEMBERS: LAWRENCE COMMERS, CHAIRMAN
DUANE PRAIRIE VOtGNIA SCHNABEL WALTER RASMUSSEN JOHN MEYER I
CITY OF FRIDLEY
T0: Housing & Redevelcpment Authority MEmbers
FROM: Jock Robertson, Executive Director of HRA
DATE: April 7, 1988
REGARDING: Request for Transfer of Anoka County Tax Forfeit lot
to ACCAP for Urban Hcrostead
This was informally reviewed and approved by the City Council at their
Mare 28, 1988, meeting. Staff is recommending the request of transfer
of tax forfeit property to ACCAP to be used for a public purpose housing
program as part of ACCAP's Urban Hcmestead Program.
JR: is
Nr- 88- 80
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: JOCK ROBERTSON 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. (B 12) 571 -3450'
FRIDLEY, MN 55432 EXT. 117
�• �•
f * _
� J
3-A
s (MYI) �[
_ f
1 !
i A
t IlNGFELi.OW
• ��V f f 1►L i - '
' u i
� r =
•
'
`.� E. 1� Cary
1
�MJ)
s
/
♦ 4. 6 : �/�/
•
4 � /YIIC
• S
•I
li
14
1
vp
100
i
ol
.f
Yl
1
.�
w Lt8ERT7
_
s (MYI) �[
_ f
1 !
i A
t IlNGFELi.OW
• ��V f f 1►L i - '
' u i
� r =
A �
Y ,
0
w
m •
Z
CIE
!r r
71 ;" p =, _ ~I ;7111 • Hrr '
i
r' till
7611. ♦ ;'a J3
LOCATION MAP
1
• S
•I
A �
Y ,
0
w
m •
Z
CIE
!r r
71 ;" p =, _ ~I ;7111 • Hrr '
i
r' till
7611. ♦ ;'a J3
LOCATION MAP
w
COUNTY OF ANOKA
Office of the County Board of Commissioners
COURTHOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 612- 421 -4760
April 7, 1988
Mr. Jock Robertson
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
Re: Delivery to Fridley BRA of Tax Forfeit Property
Dear Jack:
I am responding to your request for direction on the transfer to the Fridley
HRA of the tax forfeit property at the intersection of Broad and Fairmont
(PIN 03- 30 -24 -32- 0011). Dan IClint, Assistant County Attorney, has indicated
that the Fridley Housing Redevelopment Authority must request transfer of
the property.
Please contact Jim Plemel for the form to transfer tax forfeit property for
less than market value for a specific public purpose. Upon completion, you
may return that form to Jim who will take the transaction to the Anoka
County Board for their consideration. Upon Board approval, the County will
deliver a state tax deed with a right -of- reverter.
In order to remove the riot -of- reverter in favor of the State of Minnesota,
the HRA must file a certificate pursuant to M.S. 282.01. See the attached
copy. At that time, the Fridley HRA will be free to transfer the property
to ACCAP.
If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me.
Jaw: sw
Enclosure
Sincerel ,
oAr 0. Wright
Community Development Manager
Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer
3-C
ANOKA COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM, INC.
6008 N.E. HIGHWAY 65 • SPRING LAKE PARK, MN 55432 • PHONE 7842443
DATE: March 22, 1988
TO: Mr. Jock Robertson
Executive Director, Fridley HRA
FROM: Stephen Klein, AICP, Planning Director
RE: Transfer of tax forfeit property to ACCAP
We are requesting that the Fridley HRA acquire and transfer
the property located at Pin # 03- 30 -24 -32 -0011 to ACCAP. This
property will be used for a public purpose housing program as
part of ACCAP's Urban Homestead Program. This program will
assist a lower income family to become a home owner in Fridley.
We have had a similar project in the City of Anoka which was
very successful.
We propose to move a house onto this property from 45 75th Way
NE in Fridley. This house will match the age and style of
houses in this neighborhood. Your willingness to transfer this
property to ACCAP, at a nominal cost, would be greatly appreciated.
ACCAP will pay all transfer costs in this transaction. Please
process this as soon as possible. If you would like me to attend
your April 14th HRA Meeting, or to provide additional information,
please contact me. Thank you for your ongoing cooperation and
assistance.
AN EOUAL OPPORTUNITY OPLOYER
Engineering
Sewer
Water
Parks
Streets
Maintenance
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jock Robertson, Executive Director - HRA PW88 -107
FROM: Mark L. Burch, Asst. Public Works Director
DATE: April 7, 1988
SUBJECT: Award of Contract for Lake Pointe Development
Maintenance Project #181
On Tuesday, April 5, we opened bids for the 1988-Lake Pointe Development
Maintenance Project #181. We received 6 bids with Talberg Lawn & Landscape
Of Minnetonka, MV, submitting a low bid of $33,750.00.
This contract will provide for maintenance of the Lake Pointe Development site
for the summer of 1988. It includes mowing of all the grass, maintenance
and operation of the irrigation system ($1,400), weeding the flower beds,
pruning trees and general site cleanup in the spring and over the summer.
We have checked the references supplied by Talberg Lawn & Landscape and
have found that they have a good work record. We therefore recommend that
the HRA award a contract to Talberg Lawn & Landscape for $33,750.00 for
Lake Pointe Development Maintenance Project #181.
WB /ts
Attachment
ri
C17YOF
FNDL EY
4-A.
BID PROPOSALS FOR
LAKE POINTE DEVELOPMENT MAINTENANCE PRWECr #181
TUESDAY, APRIL 5, 1988, 11:00 A.M.
I
BID
I
TOTAL
PLAMCLDER I
I
BC ND
I
I
BID A I COMMM
I
Talberg Lawn & Landscape I
I
100 Wilshire Dr. 1
58
1 $
33, 750.00 1
Minnetonka, MN 55343 I
I
I
I
William B. Miller I
I
I
I
I
16765 Nutria St. 1
5%
1 $
39,400.00 1
Ramsey, MN 55303 1
I
1
I
1
I
Albrecht Cornpany I
I
I
1408 West Co. Rd. C. 1
5%
1 $
43,443.00 1
Minneapol is, MN 55434 1
I
1
I
1
I
Greenmasters I
I
I
7040 Lakeland Ave., K 1
5%
1 $
47r230.00 I
Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 1
I
1
I
1
I
Germundsen Companies, Inc. I
I
I
20142 -156th St., K 1
5%
1 $
86,990.00 I
Elk River, MN 55330 1
1
1
1
1
1
B& H Fairway Lawn Maint. I
I
I
9153 Davenport St. I
I
NO BID I
Blaine, mn 55434 I
I
I
i
I
I
Coanty Green Lawn Care I
(
I
Route, Box 463A I
I
NO BID I
Cambridge, MN 55008 I
I
I
I
I
D& J Constructicn
I
Route 1, Box 110 I
I
NO BID I
Hager City, WI 54014 I
I
I
I
Danny's Lawn Care I
I
1
I
I
11014 Norway St. I
I
NO BID I
Coon Rapids, MN 55433 1
I
1
I
Ed's Tree Spade I
I
I
I
I
1385 Albemarle I
(
NO BID I
St. Paul, MN 55117 I
I
I
I
I
I
4B
- 2 -
BID PROPOSALS FOR
LAKE POIM DEVELORMU M&I TPENANCE PROTECT #181
TUESDAY, APRIL 5, 1988, 11: 00 A. M.
I BID I
TOTAL I C)Ommm
PLANHCLDER I BCND I
I I
BID I
I
Gorecki & Comp. I I
I
P.0. Box 158 I I
NO BID i
Anoka, MN 55330 I t
I I
I
I
L& R Grading
2332 No. Brookv iew Dr. I I
NO BID I
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 1 I
1 I
I
I
ID Service I I
I
Highway 22 South, Box 105A I i
NO BID I
Mankato, MN 56001 1 I
I I
I
I
Wayne Laminen I i
P.O. Box 11 I 1
NO BID I
Big Lake, MN 55309 I 1
i I
I
I
Lesi Services, Inc. I I
I
7420 Unity Ave., K I I
NO BID I
Brooklyn Park, Mn 55443 1 I
I I
I
I
J. T. Noonan Co. , Inc. I 1 1
3601 - 48th Ave. , K 1 5% 1 S 46,993.00 1
Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 1 I I
Pete's Yard Care I l I
16404 Easy Street I I NO BID I
Eden Prairie, MN 55344 1 I I
I I I
Pioneer Midwest, Inc. I I I
Grove Square I I NO BID I
Maple Grove, MN 55369 1 I I
I I I
I i I
Y6111114
4-C
Tq•�.
LNE POINT DEVSLCHIM
NKMENN(E PROJECT #181
Proposal of: 72 lb01 , a44kyN$ j g CO fF rti'L'. -i
Nave /
Street Address
Ali '/ AV, 55313
City, State Zip Code
To furnish and deliver all materials and to do and perform all work, in
accordance with the contract and specifications on f it a in the office of
the Public Works Director and the "Special Provisions" contained herein
for:
LAIN POW= MU N1MNM PROD= #181
BID rM (A)
Operation and maintenance of the
In -place irrigation system
LUMP SUM - BID 1TEM (A) . _
1yc1D. o
BID IM (B)
All other maintenance items
Mowing, fertilizing, general
cleanup, etc., as spelled out
in the specifications)
Lcn4p sum - BID rrEm (s) ..... 3.2%
316111/8
7DDL BID (A + 8) . . . . . . .
$ -4 33, '750 ,°°
(f igures )
TDTAL BID (A + B)
- is -
tziuej
Engineering
Sewer
Water
Parks
Streets
Maintenance
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jock Robertson, Executive Director - HRA PW88 -110
FROM: Mark L. Burch, Asst. Public Works Director
DATE: April 8, 1988
SUBJECT: Remedial Cleanup of the Lake Pointe Development Site
Due to spring rains and runoff from the snag melt, we have experienced some
erosion problems on the Lake Pointe Development Site. These erosion areas
must be repaired to prevent further damage and to make the site ready for
the final improvements scheduled for this spring (curb and gutter, street
and landscaping) .
We have reviewed the damage and obtained quotes from two contractors to
perform tl-,Le remedial work necessary to repair the Lake Pointe Site. William
B. Miller, Inc. furnished us the lowest quote for this work at $7,500.00.
We recommend that the HRA award a contract to William B. Miller, Inc. for
$7,500.00 to perform the remedial repair work on the Lake Pointe Development
Site.
MLB /ts
Attachment
E
ri
G7YOF
FWDLLY
5-A
Y
« z
IRATE 4 -7 -88
DEPT. Figineeri.ng
s. - ._
VENDOR William B. Miller. Inc. COACT Bill Miller
ADDS - Anoka 7MEPHONE 571 -3450
SST PER UNIT COST $7 , 500.00 T DEL. DATE 4 -13 to 4 -20
VENDOR Park Construction CONTACT Grecr Welke
ADDRESS 7800 Beech St., Fridley TMEPHONE 786 -9800
COST PER UNIT TOTAL, COST $19,300-00 DEL. DATE
1. Purchases under 5100.00
a. No bids or quotes required
2. Purchases 5100 - $5,000
a. At least two (2) written quotes preferred, but (2) telephone quotes
accepted.
3. Purchases 55,000 - $10.000
a. At least two (2) written quotes required.
4. Purchases S10.000 - 115.000
a. Sealed bids required - Advertising & Council action not required.
S. Purchases over S15, 000
a. Sealed bids required
RV/9/83
Engineering
Sewer
Water
Parks
Streets
Maintenance
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jock Robertson, Executive Director - HRA PW88 -97
FROM: Mark L. Burch, Asst. Public Works Director
DATE: March 30, 1988
SUBJECT: Change Order No. 1 for Ernst Associates
Contract
We have met with Gene Ernst of Ernst Associates regarding Change Order #1
for their contract with the City for landscape consulting services for the
Lake Pointe Development. Mr. Ernst is requesting a $3,100.00 addition to
their contract to cover the additional costs incurred by Ernst Associates
due to the extended period of time that has been necessary to ccuplete this
project.
We feel that Ernst Associates has been very responsive to the City's needs
and requests on this project and recanoend that the City Council and HRA
approve Change Order No. 1 to Ernst Associates for $3,100.00.
MLB /ts
Attachment
CJiYOF
FNDLLY
6-A
Ernst Associates
25 March 1988
Mr. Mark Burch
City of Fridley
6431 University Ave. N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Ref: Lake Pointe Corporate Centre / Planting & Irrigation / Fridley
Dear Mark:
By means of this letter I am asking you to consider drafting a change order in the amount of
S3,100.00 for additional services in reference to the above mentioned project. The total amount of
fees requested in this change order covers only the cost of salaries and does not include any expense,
overhead or profit for extra services rendered.
I am requesting this change order due to the fact that I feel that the Lakepointe Corporate Centre
project has required additional time from our firm for the following reasons:
1. There have been a number of additional trips, inspections and meetings as the project was
shut down and then started up.
2. Additional time spent on changes related to pedestrian walkway systems being deleted and
relocation of the Keystone walls.
3. Additional time spent on reviewing the deletion of the rip rap in the ponding areas and coming
up with alternatives and coordinating plans and changes.
4. Taking time to meet with the various residents to explain the project and ease their concerns
about the planting and the proposed development. Did not have this included in our fees but
was willing to do it because I felt we had sufficient funds to give you that additional service.
S. I was called to the site at least 2 -3 times to approve staking of trees and after checking found
that the grading slopes were not at the correct location (west end) and spent time in checking
those out to confirm that the grading changes had to be made. After changes had been made in
the grading it required returning to the site again to restake plant material the second time.
6. Have made 2 separate complete inventories to find the exact status of the project this spring
end earlier last fall.
7. Additional time spent in selecting trees in the metro area due to stockpiling of trees and trees
unacceptable at the storage area.
B. Due to residents concerned about screening, additional time was spent on relocating and
adjusting plant material from amur maple to pine along the 40' buffer.
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ■ LAND PLANNING N 122 WEST SIXTH STREET ■ CHASKA. MINNESOTA 55318 ■ PHONE 612 -448 -4094
Ernst Associates
Mr. Mark Burch
25 March 1988
Page 2
M9 i
The total breakdown of all of the cost for salaries, expenses, and travel has been enclosed for your
review and records. If you will note, on all of our previous invoices we gave you a total rundown on
the hours spent by each individual during that billing period.
I feel that this request is in order and your consideration would be very much appreciated. If there
are any questions please do not hesitate to give me a call. I will be available to meet with the HRA if
necessary to answer any questions related to this request.
Best regards,
ERNS ASSOCIATES
Gene F. Ernst
GFE:cb
Encl.
6 -C
Ernst Associates
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
FEES (BILLED)
Mark Burch /
Gene Ernst (�
29 March 1 �
Lake Po' a Cor
G. Ernst,Frincipal
M. Salzman, Jr. Assoc.
L. Edris, Technician
T. Wichman, Jr. Assoc.
FEES (NOT BILLED)
0. Ernst, Principal
Centre (Total Contract $9.225.00)
173.25 hrs. @ $55 =
$9,528.00
7.75 hrs. @ $26 =
$201.50
18.75 hrs. @ $20 =
$375.00
174.75 hrs. @ $26 =
$4,543.50
38.0 hrs. @ $55 = $2,090.00
FEES (PROJECTED TO COMPLETE PROJECT)
0. Ernst, Principal
TOTAL FEES GENERATED BASED ON OUR
RATE SCHEDULE
18.0 hrs. @ $55 = $990.00
$17,728.75
EXPENSES ( Billed & Reimbursed) $372.18
MILEAGE (We do not bill you for this on a lump sum
contract - this is one of our overhead costs)
1496 mi.es to date @ = $314.16
I hope this doesn't leave you with an impression that we don't run a "tight ship" at Ernst Associates
office, but this project just continued to get out of hand.
Sometimes I may give more on a project than I should, but the philosophy of Ernst Associates is to
end up with a project that meets our expectations as well as those of our client and the general
public. Sometimes we pay to meet those high standards.
Thanks for your consideration of our request.
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ■ LAND PLANNING 8 122 WEST SIXTH STREET ■ CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 ■ PHONE 612 -448 -4094
6-D
PUBLIC WCRRS DEPARTMENT
Engineering Division
QTY OF FRIDLEY
Fridley, Minnesota
March 31, 1988
Ernst Associates
322 W. 6th St..
Chaska, MN 55318
SUBJECT: Change Order #1 - Landscape Design Services for
Lake Pointe Development
Gentlemen:
You are hereby ordered, authorized and instructed to modify your contract for
additional consulting services by adding the following:
Y �I i. Sa s m cl ZR 4 j q w a �i r y
Additional Consulting
Services 1 Lump Sun $3,100.00 $ 3.100.00
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 1. . . . . . $ 3,100.00
ORIGINAL CDNIRACT PRICE $ 9,225.00
CHANGE ORDER ND. 1. . . $ 3.100.00
REVISED CON TRACT AMA XNr . $12, 325.00
Submitted and approved by John G. Flora, Public Works Director on the 31st day
of March, 1988.
Prepared by
Checked by
John G. Flora, P. E.
Public Works Director
6-E
Ernst Associates.
Page 2
Change Order #1 - Landscape Design Services for
Lake Pointe Developnent
March 31, 1988
Approved and accepted this day of , 1988 by Ernst Associates
ERNST ASSOCIATES
GENE ERNSI', HUS IDENT
Approved and accepted this
Fridley, Minnesota.
3/6/4/6
day of , 1988 by the City Councii of
WIU IAM J. WE MAYOR
NAS IN M. WRF'SH I, CITY MANAGER
7
Parks
Streets
Maintenance
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jock iobertson, Executive Director - HRA PW88 -111
FROM: Mark L. Burch, Asst. Public Works Director
DATE: April 8, 1988
SUBJECT: Easement for NSP Underground Line on the
Lake Pointe Development Site
NSP has an existing overhead power line which crosses the east side of the
Lake Pointe Development Site. We have requested that this line be relocated
and that it also be buried when the relocation is accomplished. NSP has
agreed to relocate the line at no cost to the City but cannot do so until
we furnish them with a 10 -foot easement along the east and north property
lines.
We have asked Sunde Engineering to draft the necessary easement description
and will have the easement recorded if the HRA approves the granting of the
easement.
Please advise the HRA that NSP has material and crews - available to accomplish
the work this spring and if they desire to have this line relocated that
this is a good time to have the work completed.
MLB /ts
Attachment
AW
ri
FMDDL LY
3!�
I.J �'T a 7 -A
-
eJ
WN c"
A j4
Z7
c� 2
0 2 � I,
r� d �•il ~� `1'd tt
p, 4'
XV
t _ C11oy,
Ohl M-1 _11H
ori
�.� 14 . F
i 1
4 _ 1
� J '
1,
7h w ? 1� r9' � 1' •�
,! f ID J�h
1 10
y
i j 11 =' 9u
n..
IL
Ic
FRIDLEY PLAZA ASSOCIATES A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
March 28, 1988
Members of the Fridley HRA
c/o John L. Robertson
Executive Director, Fridley HRA
6431 University Avenue Northeast
Fridley, MN 55432
Re: Proposed Financing
124 unit market rate apartments
Fridley, Minnesota
Dear HRA Members:
As discussed at the last HRA meeting held Thursday, March
10, 1988, we herein submit the following, a letter of
understanding between Louis R. Lundgren and the Fridley
HRA for our proposed 124 unit luxury apartment building
at the Southwest Quadrant of University Avenue and
Mississippi Parkway in the City of Fridley, Minnesota.
This letter shall represent the terms of the extension
until June 28, 1988, which was requested by Louis R.
Lundgren and herein granted by the Fridley HRA, as dis-
cussed and authorized at the last HRA meeting.
Q
u
Louis R. Lundgren agrees to:
1. Submit an application to Centennial Mortgage, Inc.
within fifteen days of this agreement.
2. During this ninety day extension period, an update
to the Market Study will be completed.
3. During this period, upon receipt of a cor- mnitment letter
from Centennial Mortgage, Inc., revised pro formal will
be submitted.
The Fridley HRA agrees to do the following during this
ninety day extension period:
1. Not collect on the Letter of Credit.
2. Enter into negotiations with Mr. Lundgren for the terms
of a development contract and other documents which may
be necessary for the proposed development.
343 East Kellogg Boulevard, sr. paul, minnesota 55101
612 -224 -4765
a-P,
Members of the Fridley HRA
March 28, 1988
Page Two
3. Upon receipt of commitment letter and revised pro
formas, work with Mr. Lundgren to review real estate
tax issues and the implications of proposed State
legislation reducing property taxes.
4. Continue Mr. Lundgren's exclusive rights to develop
entire four phase project during the term of this
ninety day extension.
Very truly yours,
o is R. Lundgren, I
Managing General Partne.
Fridley Plaza Associates
The undersigned, on behalf of the Housing & Redevelopment
Authority of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, agrees to
the above terms.
�1
John L. Robertson
Executive Director
Fridley HRA
LRL:rz
Engineering
Sewer
Water
Parks
Streets
Maintenance
MEMORANDUM
TO: John G. Flora, Public Works Director PW88 -82
FROM: Mark L. Burch, Asst. Public Works Director
DATE: March 22, 1988
SUBJECT: Change Order #3 for Street Improvement
Project No. ST. 1986 - 1 & 2, Phase II
We are forwarding Change Order No. 3 for Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1986 -
1 & 2, Phase II to the City Council for their consideration and approval. This
change order will allow payment of $2,500 to H & S Asphalt, Inc. for remobiliza-
tion of their work force to complete the curb, gutter and street improvements
on the Lake Pointe site. We feel this remobilization cost is reasonable and
recommend that the City Council approve Change Order No. 3 to H & S Asphalt:,
Inc. for $2,500.
MLB /ts
Attachments
AW
VJ
FWDLEY
M,
SUNDE ENGINEERING, INC.
GERALD M. SUNDE, Consulting Engineer
9001 East Bloomington Frwy. • Bloomington, MN 55420 • (612) 881 -3344
March 24, 1988
CITY OF FRIDLEY
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
Attention: Mr. Mark Burch
Re: 86 -238, LAKE POINTE CORPORATE CENTRE
Dear Mr. Burch:
We hereby recommend approval of Change Order No. 3 to City
of Fridley Project 86 -1 & 2, Phase 2 for H. & S. Asphalt Co. in
the amount of $2,500.00 for additional costs associated with ex-
tending the Contract into this year's construction season.
Sincerely,
SUNDE ENGINEERING, INC.
Paul T. Swenson,
Engineer
PTS /sg
PUBLIC WORKS DEPMmun 9 -B
Engineering Division
CITY OF FRILILEY
Fridley, Minnesota
March 28, 1988
H & S Asphalt, Inc.
1700 Industry Blvd.
Anoka, Mil 55303
S)BJECr: Change Order #3 - Street Improvement Project No.
ST. 1986 - 1 & 2, Phase II of
Gentlemen:
You are hereby ordered, authorized and instructed to modify your contract for
Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1986 - 1 & 2, Phase II by adding the
following:
RQnobil ization for the
1988 Construction
Season Lump Sum $2,500.00 $ 2.500.00
7MAL CRINGE ORDER ND. 1. . . . . . $ 2#500* 00
ORIGINAL ODNM7 ACP PRICE . . . . . . . . . $368,054.10
CHANGE ORDER ND. 1. . . . . . . . . . . .$ 17,250.00
CHANGE ORDER N0. 2. . . . . . . . . . . .5 21460.00
CHANGE ORDER ND. 3. . . . . . . . . . . .$ 2.500.00
REVISED ODNIRACr AMOUNT . . . . . . . . .5390,264.10
Submitted and approved by John G. Flora, Public Works Director on the 28nd day
of March, 1988.
Prepared by
Checked by
John G. Flora, P. L
Public Works Director
H & S Asphalt, Inc. 9 -C
Page 2
Change Order #3 - project No. ST. 1986 - 1 & 2, phase II
March 28, 1988
Approved and accepted this day of , 1988 by H & S Asphalt, Inc.
H & S ASPHALT/p, INC.
bUL. a_ -"
William B. Miller, President
Approved and accepted this day of , 1988 by the City Council of
Fridley, Minnesota.
WnIIAM J. NEE MAYOR
NAS M M. QURESSHI, CITY MANAGER
3/6/4/6
Engineering
Sewer
Water
Parks
Streets
Maintenance
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jock Robertson, Executive Director - HRA PW88 -112
FROM: Mark L. Parch, Asst. Public Works Director
DATE: April 8, 1988
SUBJECT: Nature Center Fence Project #180
In order to prevent further damage to the southern portions of the Springbrook
Nature Center by four -wheel drive vehicles and motor bikes and prevent dumping
of trash, we are installing a fence to control access to the park.
This fence will also secure the detention ponds constructed within the park
in and around the southern boundary.
We have awarded a contract to Crowley Fence Company for $21,595.75 for the
construction of a fence. along the southern and part of the eastern boundary
of the Nature Center.
Please advise the HRA of our plans for this security fence for the Nature
Center Park.
MLB /ts
/_
CnYOF
FPJDLEY
1
Page 1 of 2
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority
In and for the City of Fridley
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue NE
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
Attention: Jock Robertson, City Planner
RE: 1001 Hillwind Road
Lot: 3 Addition: Aud Sub NO 25 Plat: 54155
941 Hillwind Road
Lot: 1 Blk: 1 Addition: Hillwind Plat: 56217
Hillwind Office Plaza
Approx. 33,000 sq. ft., 3 story office complex with a
cost of approximately $1,980,000.00.
Dear Mr. Robertson,
Subsequent to our discussion I submit to you the Development
Package for you to present to the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority In and for the City of Fridley, on April 14, for
their perusal and consideration.
This following numerically outlines the specific objectives
of a development package that are essential to achieve the
redevelopment of the above documented Project Area:
Development Package
1. Recommendation of rezoning of Lot: 3 Aud Sub No. 25
to CR -1 for redevelopment.
2. Development part of City's Redevelopment Project and
designated as a Tax Increment Financing District.
3. HRA to enhance development by:
- -A site survey according to AIA Document G 601
- -Site borings at 3 or 4 exact locations
- -A civil engineer consultant to do a drainage
plan showing all utility connections and services
available, i.e., electrical, gas, water storm
-- Public Improvements, demolition and site
preparation, etc;
-- Installation of development infrastructure
-- Installation of parking lot, curbing; etc.
-- Installation of sewer and water
11 A
Page 2 of 2
4. HRA recommendation to purchase the property - Lot: 3
Aud Sub No 25 and Lot : 1 Blk: 1 Hillwind Addition
(as described above) from fee owner at an agreed
price, and sell back, at a reduced price, to fee owner
on a second mortgage at 8% per annum (length of bonds
or mortgage).
5. Recommendation that the City of Fridley sell IDB's to
assist the developer to fiance projects costs.
6. Any other assistance HRA can offer.
As a point of information, and also, a issue we discussed at
our first meeting; was that a contract for private
development by and between the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority in and for the City of Fridley and Fehling,
Fehling, and Nybo (now Stinski), was previously committed to
in 1982. This development contract was for the redevelopment
of the project area legally described on page one.
Your attention and consideration to this development package
is very much appreciated.
Sincerely,
OCheryl Stins
1612 Berne Circle
Fridley, Minnesota
Y
W ■
1
1
L i
I
i=
3
C y
i
s �
i lip = i
•3
_ LO �-, a
N � O
ON
e
-t�1
•4 J �„
• I � f" � is
I C = I
1 gYYg1— T
I _a r 4 O•• 1
� � I i`F ". — LL�_�-- /I� _� �O� •4th
=.';mot �.�:,�.;;;�•'"�`;-, �-.� -
,fit:':.• ° .� ����
r
Y
m
C
-aim,
,
' v
i
N
I
0
FM
t�\l
.4 �
i am r
r A 8
f 0 ,
I
I
I
- 1- s r
SITE PLAN
11 C
FLOOR PLAN
`
JIO
?�N
I
c
a
�
0
i
3
_
�
1f
Y
�
S
u°
a
i
I
d
�O-L5
po oz
y e
N
�
�1
d
d
W
'
Z! 'A
66 z
FLOOR PLAN
11D
ELEVATION
•
ii a
•
i
�
I
i fa
' ra
,
t
!z�
.o:
Zl
ELEVATION
W
C LA I MS
1731 - 1737
AW
®s
ENGINEERS I ARCHfTECTS ■ PLANNERS
_Z, STLlT7rF 7 �q,__, tit- nn`dE5OTAS51'7 e!2 484-n272
City of Fridley
6431 University Ave. N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
ATTN: John Flora
Director of Public Works
12 -A
INVOICE
March 15, 1988
T.H. 65 /LIGHTING
INVOICE NO 1636 SEH FILE NO. 84142.02
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. FOR PERIOD JANUARY 24 THRU FEBRUARY 20, 1988
For T.H. 65 street lighting from I -694 to Rice Creek Road.
Project Manager 1.0 hrs @ $55.58/hr =
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE AND PAYABLE THIS INVOICE . . . . . . . .
MAXIMUM FEE: $6,375.00
INVOICED TO DATE: $4,622.43
�i�t�e s� .�Cisr�t�ssn#at, ss
COUNTY OF RAMSEY, CITY OF SAINT PAUL
Donald E. Lund
In said County and State. being duty sworn.
on cath, says. that he is Vice President
of the Shon- Elllon- Hendrickson. Inc., that the foregoing account is just and true; that the services therein charged were actually rendered.
and of the value therein charged; that the fees or amounts charged therefore are such as are allowed by Law; and that no pan of such
account has been pad
Subscnbed and sworn to before me this
My commission expires
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC
day of 19
19
ST PAUL,
MINNESOTA
$55.58
$55.58