HRA 09/14/1989 - 6399t
r
'e
s•
J
i
b
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MEETING
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1989 7:OOP,M.
City of Fridley
A G E N D A
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MTG. SEPT. 14, 1989 7:00 P.M.
Location: Fridley Municipal Center
6431 University Avenue N.E.
City Council Chambers * **
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 10, 1989
CONSIDERATION OF OUTLINE FOR CREATING A TIF
DISTRICT AND FOR A REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
WITH SBF DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 - lA
CONSIDERATION OF PLAZA LANDSCAPE REVISIONS. . . . . . . . .2 - 2C
INFORMATION ON PARKING RAMP CONSTRUCTION COSTS. . . . . . .3 - 3C
INFORMATION ON BIDS FOR ANTI- GRAFFITI
SEALER FOR PARKING RAMP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 - 4B
INFORMATION ON ATLAS DEVELOPMENT AND
RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION PROPOSALS FOR THE
SOUTHWEST QUADRANT OF UNIVERSITY & MISSISSIPPI. . . . . . .5 - 5C
INFORMATION ON OUTLINE OF DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT WITH PRO - ENGINEERING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
ESTIMATES:
ROYAL ELECTRIC - EAST MOORE LAKE DRIVE . . . . . . . .7
GREENMASTERS, INC. - LAKE POINTE MAINTENANCE . . . . .8 - 8A
CLAIMS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9
OTHER BUSINESS
ADJOURNMENT
* ** Note new meeting location!!!
M
1
9
s _ CITY OF FRIDLEY
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, AUGUST 10, 1989
CALL TO ORDER:
Vice - Chairperson Schnabel called the August 10, 1989, Housing &
Redevelopment Authority meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Virginia Schnabel, Duane Prairie, John Meyer,
Walter Rasmussen
Members Absent: Larry Commers
Others Present: Jock Robertson, Executive Director of HRA
William Burns, City Manager and Director of HRA
David Newman, HRA Attorney
Julie Burt, Finance Officer
APPROVAL OF JUNE 8. 1989, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MINUTES•
OTION by Mr. Prairie, seconded by Mr. Meyer, to approve the June
8, 1989, Housing & Redevelopment Authority minutes as written.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE - CHAIRPERSON SCHNABEL
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
1. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR STINSKI /HILLWIND
CENTRE OFFICE BUILDING:
Mr. Robertson stated that at the April 13, 1989, meeting, the HRA
approved the conceptual outline for the Stinski /Hillwind project.
Because so much time has passed, staff felt it was important for
the HRA to review the development agreement before execution of the
final agreement. The staff is satisfied that the development
agreement meets the general direction made by the HRA in April and
recommend approval.
Mr. Newman stated this is direct land writedown of $109,500.
Construction has already started, even though the Development
Agreement has not been signed, and the developer will receive the
money when the project is completed. The attorney for the
developer is in agreement with the recommended changes.
� M
3
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING - PAGE 2
Ms. Schnabel asked if the developer deviates from the plans and
specifications, does the contract with the HRA become null and
void?
Mr. Newman stated that is correct.
Mr. Robertson stated the HRA previously directed Mr. Commers and
himself to sign the agreement. Unless the HRA members have any
objection, staff will proceed as directed.
The HRA members were in agreement that Jock Robertson and Larry
Comers should proceed to execute the final development agreement
as previously directed.
2. CONSIDERATION OF ELECTRONIC SECURITY AND ANTI- GRAFFITI SEALER
FOR FRIDLEY PLAZA RAMP:
Mr. Robertson stated Mr. Burns has expressed an interest in
security cameras and wanted the HRA to reconsider what was
previously discussed last fall and winter in addition to getting
cameras and monitoring equipment for some of the holding areas in
the Police Department.
Mr. Burns stated a few weeks ago they found that the cameras for
the Police Department were not in the package for audio visual in
the Council Chambers, and they sought quotes for six cameras in the
Police Department. While they were doing that, it was his
suggestion to seek an alternate quote for a camera somewhere in the
doorway area of the lower level of the ramp. He thought it might
be a good idea to have at least one camera that might serve a dual
purpose of screening the traffic that is coming into the Police
Department and perhaps screening what is going on in one of the
darker, secluded areas of the ramp.
Mr. Burns stated that in discussions with Bill Hunt, Tim Turnbull,
and himself, they came to the conclusion that in addition to a
camera, some sound protection devices are also needed. As the HRA
members recalled, the last time electronic security for the ramp
was discussed, the Police Department objected to having cameras
because they would have to have a staff person monitoring the TV
monitor, and they did not have a person to do that.
Mr. Burns stated that with the sound devices, however, the person
in the Police Department need not devote full attention to the
monitor. Perhaps they could have the sound devices that would be
activated by a cry for help or a loud pitched disturbance. They
ultimately came up with a plan to mount approximately six speakers
that have the capability of hearing any level of voice or noise in
the ramp, depending on how they are set for loudness. The quotes
came in at approximately $3,500 -3,600 for the camera and
6
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING - PAGE 3
approximately $7,000 for the speaker system. Total estimated cost
is $10,000 - 11,000.
Mr. Prairie asked if having this camera and sound system would
reduce the cost of insurance needed for the ramp.
Mr. Burns stated they have had the risk management company look at
this, but they do not believe it will impact the insurance in any
way. The City Attorney, Virgil Herrick, thinks that in terms of
liability, it is a discretionary matter.
Mr. Newman stated $11,000 is pretty cheap compared to a legal suit
sometime in the future.
Mr. Meyer stated having the extra security will give people some
piece of mind.
Mr. Burns stated that the lower level will be a little darker in
the wintertime because of snow storage by the chain link fence, and
he thought a camera and sound device will give people a better
sense of security.
Ms. Schnabel stated that at an earlier meeting, Mr. Turnbull had
said that people should not feel secure just because there is a
camera, as a camera can give people a false sense of security.
Mr. Burns agreed, however, he stated the camera may also act as a
deterrent to a potential perpetrator.
Mr. Burns stated he is concerned that the camera be mounted inside
Lexan or something that will protect the camera so it cannot be
easily stolen or vandalized.
Mr. Rasmussen asked if the company that installs the camera has any
kind of policy whereby they will maintain the camera and sound
device.
Mr. Burns stated that is something that will have to be taken into
consideration, and maybe they can have a maintenance contract with
the company. There would be some additional expense for a
maintenance contract.
MOTION by Mr. Meyer, seconded by Mr. Rasmussen, to authorize the
HRA staff to advertise and receive bids on the camera and
monitoring equipment to be reviewed by the HRA at the September HRA
meeting.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE - CHAIRPERSON SCHNABEL
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING - PAGE 4
Mr. Robertson stated that even though the HRA earmarked funds for
painting the lower level white, the Public Safety Director, Jim
Hill, and the Public Works Director, John Flora, feel the lighting
level is adequate. However, John Flora, pointed out that it would
cost less money to paint a sealer on the lower level which would
reduce maintenance costs in the future if there are acts of
vandalism and graffiti. Staff is recommending that the HRA use
part of the money earmarked for painting the interior white to be
used instead for a concrete sealer which will make any future
graffiti easier to remove.
Ms. Schnabel asked if the sealer comes in colors.
Mr. Robertson stated he believed a pigment can be added to the
sealer.
Ms. Schnabel stated that if the sealer comes in colors, maybe the
ramp could be painted with a white sealer.
Mr. Robertson stated he had asked that question, and was told it
would increase the costs significantly back to the level of just
buying the white paint.
Ms. Schnabel stated that if in the future it is determined that the
walls should be lighter, can paint be applied over the sealer?
Mr. Meyer stated he believed they could apply a pigment sealer over
the original sealer in later years.
Mr. Robertson stated another thing to think about is if they apply
a color, either paint or a pigment sealer, then where do they stop
when painting the columns? Do they paint one side or all four
sides of the column? If they are satisfied with the natural
concrete color, then it has an architectural unity because they are
not creating different surfaces.
OTION by Mr. Meyer, seconded by Mr. Prairie, to authorize the
Public Works Director to advertise and receive bids and accept the
low bid for applying a clear anti - graffiti sealer to the lower
level ramp, unless the bid exceeds the amount originally earmarked
for white paint.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE - CHAIRPERSON SCHNA3EL
DECLARED THE NOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Robertson stated he would like to call the HRA members'
attention to the last paragraph of Mr. Flora's memo on agenda page
2 -B regarding the light fixtures that were not purchased. Right
now they have temporary wooden bases covering up the electrical
system. He would propose the HRA wait on this, because they are
going ahead with the TV monitoring. The HRA might decide they want
- HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING - PAGE 5
decorative metal caps in the future, and it is not necessary to act
on this at this time.
Ms. Schnabel asked that regarding the stress cracks that have
appeared in the main joists of the ramp, can they be assured that
the parking ramp structure is sound? Do they need another opinion
on the stress cracks?
Mr. Meyer stated he would be willing to take a look at the cracks
and see if there is any reason to solicit another opinion on the
soundness of the ramp.
3. CONSIDERATION OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO RETROFIT EXISTING
GARAGE AND CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY AT 5755 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E.
Mr. Robertson stated that in December 1986 when the redesign of the
Hathaway /Hackmann /Hillwind /Central intersection was approved, it
was pointed out that Mr. Flaten's driveway would have to be
rerouted. At that time, Mr. Flaten agreed to that and was directed
to get some bids for changing the orientation of his garage from
the north to the south. Staff had hoped to include the driveway
paving in this year's street project. The Public Works Department
took another look at the original proposal and decided there would
be a savings in constructing the new driveway by taking the
driveway out on the west elevation rather than on the south
elevation.
Mr. Robertson stated staff has proceeded and have the low bid for
the retrofit of the garage of $2,475. Staff recommends the HRA
authorize the payment of $2,475 to Mr. Flaten towards the
reconstruction of his garage and authorize the Public Works
Director to remove the existing driveway and construct a new
driveway from Hackmann Avenue to the garage at a cost of $3,500.
Also, staff recommends the HRA consider granting the excess
property indicated on agenda page 3 -A to Mr. Flaten after the new
intersection is constructed in return for his agreement to maintain
said property.
MOTION by Mr. Rasmussen, seconded by Mr. Prairie, to authorize the
payment of $2,475 to Mr. Flaten towards the reconstruction of his
garage and authorize the Public Works Director to remove the
existing driveway and construct a new driveway from Hackmann Avenue
to the garage at a cost of $3,500. Also, the HRA agrees to grant
the excess property to Mr. Flaten after the new intersection is
constructed in return for his agreement to maintain said property.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE - CHAIRPERSON SCHNABEL
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING - PAGE 6
4. INFORMATION ON THE COUNCIL CONFERENCE ON SENIOR HOUSING:
Mr. Robertson stated Mr. Meyer and Mr. Commers attended the July
31, 1989, Council Conference meeting concerning senior housing
policy. On July 31, the Council discussed potential policies
regarding senior housing and directed staff to research the types
of financial tools that are available to assist senior housing.
Mr. Robertson stated that he assumes that on specific senior
housing proposals, the Council's direction to the HRA is to wait
for City Council direction.
Mr. Burns stated he feels the City Council needs to have some
informal discussions soon and make some decisions on timing and
policy. He stated he did not think staff has a clear sense of
direction at this point from the City Council.
5. INFORMATION ON COUNCIL CONFERENCE ON CENTRAL AVENUE
REDEVELOPMENT:
Mr. Robertson stated that at the July 31, 1989, City Council
Conference meeting, the Council also reviewed a first draft of the
proposed long range plan for the renovation of Central Avenue,
primarily from Moore Lake Commons north past Onan, Medtronic, and
the junkyards to Osborne Road. This would be one of the components
of the updated Comprehensive Plan. A number of economic
development, land use conflicts, and sign issues have come up over
the last couple of years, and there is an urgent need for some
consistent long range vision as to how to treat some of these
proposals in this area.
Mr. Robertson stated that as a result of this, the plan identified
a number of potential redevelopment projects in the area, the idea
being that as Moore Lake Commons begins to draw traffic into this
area, this may trigger other development proposals. However, there
are a number of potential, very expensive projects, both in public
works, landscaping, and boulevard treatments on either side of
Central Avenue, as well as redevelopment projects such as
relocating and redeveloping the junkyards. The sense of the City
Council, Mr. Commers, and Mr. Meyer was to send the staff back to
produce a scaled -down version of the original long range plan which
would stress those components of the original draft which are
doable and financeable in the foreseeable future.
Mr. Prairie stated he would like to see them get their priorities
straight. He stated University Avenue is the most visible to the
community. He would not like to see them get 20 -30% done on 2 -3
projects without finishing one project.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING - PAGE 7
Mr. Burns stated he believed that was Mr. Commers' concern also.
On the other hand, there is not much developable land left in
Fridley, so it makes sense to have some policies in place to guide
development in this area.
Mr. Robertson stated he hopes to have a draft of the proposed long
range plan for Central Avenue at the September HRA meeting.
6. INFORMATION ON 57TH PLACE ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING AND RAPID OIL:
Mr. Robertson stated he spoke with the geologist from Delta
Environmental who is performing tests on the site. Based on what
the geologist found, there is sufficient indication of potential
ground water contamination and Delta Environmental is requesting
three more testing wells.
Mr. Robertson stated Dave Newman, the HRA's attorney, is advising
that the HRA take no further action on the proposed redevelopment
of the larger 57th Place area until the results of this report are
available.
Mr. Robertson stated the HRA should also be aware that Ashland Oil
has submitted an application for a special use permit and variances
to redevelop the site. The site does not include the single family
lot to the east previously purchased by Rapid Oil Change. Ashland
Oil is proposing to build a two bay drive - through facility very
similar to the one at 73 1/2 Avenue /Highway 65.
7. ESTIMATE: GREENMASTERS - LAKE POINTE MAINTENANCE
MOTION by Mr. Prairie, seconded by Mr. Meyer, to approve the
estimate to Greenmasters in the amount of $4,644.14.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE - CHAIRPERSON SCHNABEL
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8. ESTIMATE: ROYAL ELECTRIC - EAST MOORE LAKE IRRIGATION
MOTION by Mr. Meyer, seconded by Mr. Rasmussen, to approve, the
estimate to Royal Electric in the amount of $2,221.96.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE- CHAIRPERSON SCHNABEL
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
9. CLAIMS (1916- 1931):
NOTION by Mr. Rasmussen, seconded by Mr. Prairie, to approve the
check register dated August 10, 1989.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE - CHAIRPERSON SCHNABEL
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING PAGE 8
Ms. Blurt gave the HRA members a copy of the Financial Report for
December 31, 1988.
10. (OTHER BUSINESS:
a. BBF Development Corporation
Mr. Robertson stated the HRA members had received a copy of a
letter from SBF Development Corporation addressed to him dated
August 4, 1989. SBF Development Corporation is proposing the
redevelopment of the Cub Food store site on the southwest corner
of Osborne Road /University Avenue. Contrary to their expectations
and their reassurance to the City Council that they would be able
to secure total financing for the project, they are asking the City
to examine the feasibility of using its T.I.F. program to
underwrite about 10% of what is represented as a $5 million
project.
Mr. Robertson stated he had asked Jim Casserly to prepare an
analysis "of what alternatives are available to the HRA if there ds
such a mechanism of underwriting part of the primary financing.
That analysis was just received that morning, and staff has not had
time to review it. He is suggesting that staff review Mr.
Casserly's alternatives and have a recommendation for the HRA at
their September meeting.
b. Proposed Pro Engineering Manufacturing Facility
Mr. Robertson stated the HRA had also received a copy of a letter
from Pro Engineering, Inc., addressed to him dated August 9, 1989,
and a memo he had written to the HRA dated August 9, 1989. Pro
Engineering is outgrowing its existing facilities in Maple Grove
and is considering relocating in Fridley. They are proposing a
24,000 sq. ft. expandable building on the north side of Fireside
Drive between Viking Chevrolet and American Service Corporation.
Mr. Robertson stated this is very similar to the Metal -Tek proposal
reviewed and approved by the HRA last winter (which subsequently
fell through) . The total cost of land and building are about
$1,000,000. There is no soil correction, but it will bring in
about 20 -30 new jobs and tax base. It is a classic T.I.F. -type
project where there is a minimum type of exposure. They would
accept a second mortgage of 10 -15% of the total project costs.
Mr. Robertson stated staff will analyze this proposal further and
will bring a proposal back to the HRA at their September meeting.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING - PAGE 9
as Ron Clark Construction
Mr. Robertson stated the HRA had received a copy of a letter from
Ron Clark Construction, Inc., addressed to him dated August 8,
1989. This developer is interested in the southwest corner of
Mississippi /University Avenue. They are interested in pursuing a
proposal of approximately 50,000 sq. ft. of retail and a three -
story, 100 -unit apartment building. Total development costs are
$10,000,000. It is in the same price range as the Tanurb proposal,
but the mix is different; therefore, he believed taxes on
apartments are about 60% of what they would be on commercial floor
area.
Mr. Robertson stated he will have a quick analysis done comparing
this proposal with the general parameters of the Tanurb proposal
of what kind of increment would be available and what kind of
assistance would be available. He hoped to have this information
for the HRA at their September meeting also.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Mr. Rasmussen, seconded by Mr. Prairie, to adjourn the
meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Vice - Chairperson
Schnabel declared the August 10, 1989, Housing & Redevelopment
Authority meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m.
Respectfully subm' ted,
Lynn aba
Recording Secretary
OUSNG and REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
1.
COMMISSION MEMBERS: LAWRENCE COMMERS, CHAMMAN
DUANE PRAM rMWGA SCHNABEL WALTER RASMUSSEN JOHN MEYER
CITY OF FRIDLEY
DATE: September 8, 1989
TO: Housing and Redevelopment Authority
FROM: Jock Robertson, Executive Director of HRA
SUBJECT: Proposed SBF Redevelopment of Cub Foods Store Site
Staff has reviewed the summary prepared by Casserly, Molzahn, &
Associates, of financial assistance for the proposed SBF Cinemark
redevelopment of the old Cub Foods store site. The consultant has
concluded that a loan guarantee would not be cost effective and
recommends instead the use of a limited revenue note as a no -risk
option and the creation of a tax increment financing redevelopment
district (see packet) . The second mortgage option is not available
to us. Trusco, the Canadian equity partner, already has pledged
a second mortgage on this project.
An optional 3 -5% grant at substantial completion, at the 3 -5%
traditional range, would yield $126,000- 210,000, using Farrell's
estimated project costs of $4.2 million. A redevelopment tax
increment district for just this parcel would yield a tax increment
of approximately $125,000 a year based on estimated market value
computed by Leon Madsen, City Assessor. Mr. Farrell has reviewed
this computation and agrees with it.
We recommend that the HRA authorize staff to initiate the process
of creating a redevelopment tax increment financing district to
include, not only the Cub Foods site, but possibly the older
commercial properties on the other side of Osborne Road to the
corner of Osborne and University Avenue. Secondly, we recommend
initiating an outline of a development agreement with SBF
Corporation in the form of a limited revenue note for a total of
$255,000 to be paid at $85,000 a year for the first three years
that taxes are received on the project. Mr. Farrell has informed
us that such a revenue enhancement would be useful to him in
helping secure the primary financing for the development. It would
stabilize the revenue during the initial several years of the
project. Mr. Farrell will be present at the meeting to discuss
this proposal and answer your questions.
JR:ls
M -89 -546
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: JOCK ROBERTSON 0431 UNIVERSITY AVE. (4 12) 571 -3450
FRIDLEY, MN 55432 EXT. 117
1 -A
SBF DEVELOPMENT CORP.
SUNSET RIDGE BUSINESS PARK
5871 CEDAR LAKE RD.
ST. LOUIS PARK. MN 55416
TELEPHONE: (612) 541 -4728
August 4, 1989
Mr. Jock Robertson
Director of Community Development
City of Fridley - Civic Center
6431 University Avenue NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Dear Mr. Robertson:
This is to confirm our conversation of August 3, 1989 during which we discussed the
possibility of some Tax Increment Financing assistance for our re- development of the Cub
Foods building in Fridley. It is my understanding that, at my request, the City of Fridley
will be exploring the possibility of designating 250 Osborne Road a Tax Increment district.
In conjunction with this, the City will also be examining the practical and political feasibility
of using its T.I.F. program to underwrite 10 %, or $420,000, of our project. We fully expect
the City to require some sort of security for its partial underwriting of our project.
I look forward to working with you on this endeavor and appreciate your efforts on our
behalf. We both, I believe, have a common objective: to re- develop the property with a
movie - theatre anchor.
Thank you for your assistance.
Very truly yours,
IOUSNG and REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
2
COMMISSION MEMBERS: LAWRENCE COMMERS, CNARMAN
BIANE PRARE 1/RMNA SCHNABEL WALTER RASMUSSEN JOHN MEYER
CITY OF FRIDLEY
DATE: September 7, 1989
TO: Housing and Redevelopment Authority
FROM: Jock Robertson, Executive Director of HRA
SUBJECT: Plaza Landscape Revisions
The trees in the Fridley Plaza are about ten years old and apparently will
need to be replaced in the next several years. I refer to the attached
recommendations from the City Public Works Director and the Kraus Anderson
Construction Company. In addition, when the trees are replaced, it is
recommended that the surrounding red brick pavers be replaced with cast iron
grates in order to ensure proper moisture and air for healthy growth. The
total cost for this renovation would be approximately $11,000.
At this time, there appears to be several options:
1. Do nothing at this time and wait several years until more trees
have died before replacing.
2. Replace all the trees at this time as recommended by Public Works.
3. Remove all trees and replace with paving materials instead.
4. Remove dead trees and those with 50% or less healthy canopy.
5. Remove all trees and replace with fewer, more widely spaced larger
trees.
I believe that the budget for any of these options must come from funds
separate from the landscaping around the new Plaza parking ramp. Since we
are waiting to see how the finances are going to work out on some of our
major HRA projects that are on hold at this time, I would recommend that the
HRA wait for at least one year before taking action on the Plaza landscaping.
In the meantime, I would recommend we ask our staff Landscape Architect to
draw up some brief sketches of alternative proposals for the HRA to review
in 1990.
JR:Is
M -89 -538
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: JOCK ROBERTSON 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. (612) 671 -3460
FRIDLEY, MN 55432 EXT. 117
2 -A
Perks
Streets
Mainlenanee
MEMORANDUM
70: --,look Robertson, Emcutive Director - HRA PW89 -326
FROK: Jahn G. F1oralPublic Works Director
SITE: August 24, 1989
SUBJECT: Plaza Landscape Revisions
We have been advised by our Project Manager, our Architect, our landscape
Contractor and our staff Planning Assistant that the installation of locust Trees
in the Plaza is not the best species of trees to be placed at this location based
upon the stress and amount of space available for tree growth. Accordingly, they
have recommended that the locust Trees be replaced with a Stmzmt Ash which is
more adaptable to this type of environment. In addition, it has been
that the red brick pavers currently used in the tree areas be replaced with cast
iron grates in order to insure that the tree root structure receives the proper
amount of moisture and air for continued growth. The above parties indicate
that the placement of brick pavers will substantially affect the tree development
and require periodic replacement in order to maintain the proper aesthetic
appearanoe of the Plaza area.
As a result of these comments, we have retested identification of costs
associated with modifying the landscape emit act to incorporate the Ash Trees
and the installations of cast iron grates. In addition, we have deleted the
suggested planting for the individual planting boxes because of the freeze /thaw
affect on the roots and replacing these with flower bulbs and plants. Zile net
result of these changes is a $11,112.00 addition to the landscape contract.
The deletion of the existing eight (8) Immts, brick pavers and additional
landscaping amounts to $7,000.00. 7he addition of fifteen (15) Ash Trees and
to plant the bulbs amounts to $8,262.00 and the p locur n ent and installation of
the cast iron grates amounts to $9,850.00.
Based upon the re 1.. - eniatioans of all of air consultants, I would suggest the
HRA consider modifying the landscaping contract with Seefert -dines for an amount
of $11,112.00. affecting the replaeesaent of the Plaza Locust Trees with Summit
Ash Tees and the installation of cast iren grates at the tree bases.
JGF /ts
cc: William W.
.' 6P
2 -B
KRAUS- ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
CONTRACTORS C CONSTRUCTION MANAQERP
August 24. 1989
Mr. John Flora
'Ci of Fridley
6431 University Avenue NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Re: Fridley Civic Canter
Fridley, Minnesota
K/A Project No. 3789
Landscape Revisions
Dear Mr. Flora:
I have reviewed with Seefert- Heins, the landscape contractor, several revisions that
have been requested by the City of Fridley and Boarman & Associates. They are as
follows:
Delete eight (8) Sunburst Locust trees at Plaza as described in Alternate #1
of the landscape bid package.
Delete reinstall ation of avers at eight (8) trees.
Delete thirty-seven (37 f Choke Cherry shrubs.
Delete four (4) Colorado Omen Spruce
Delete two (2) Agoda Dogwood
Total amount of deduct ($7,000.00)
Add the following work:
Add fifteen (15) Ash trees with a minimum of 31/2" caliper.
Add two hundred ten (210) bulbs in planters at front entrance including
Eft-four (54) mum plants.
...
$8,262.00
Provide fifteen (15) Neenah Tree Grades OR8738 -1, FOB Jobsite -
ADD: $7,350.00
Modify fifteen (15) sidewalk openings and install tree grates
ADD: $2,500.00.
MINNEAPOLIS DIVISION
525 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55404 PHONE: 612 - 332.7281
Equel Opp ++* Employer
h a
6123326173
SENT LW :Xerox Telecopier 7020 : 8 -24 -89 : 1 :43PM ;
City of Fridley
-2-
This quotation is valid until September 15, 1989,
6123326173-+ 612 571 1257:a 3
2 -C
August 24,1989
Please review and advise if you want to proceed with these revisions.
Very truly yours.
KRAUS ERSO NSTRUCInON COMPANY
o ac ett
Project Manager
TJS:ng
Enclosures
cc: Jon Rall
Rick Pribyl
Brian Turnquist
Aena
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jock Rabertson, Executive Director-HA PW89 -333
F[KI: John G. Flora, 6r blic Works Director
HATE: September 1, 1989
i
SQBJEM: Municipal Ramp Oaamtruction Smeary Update
The following breakout of the Municipal Ramp costs lists the items, cost and originator of
the work. Staff represents the City and the Architect. Omitted represents items that were
left out of the drawings or not submitted to the contractors in their bid packets. The cost
amounts reflect the information available as of this date.
ORIGINAL COACT AHMW
$ 750,878.00
Additions and Oranges
P.R.
ITE K
COST
ORIGIlA
5
TV monitoring
$ 8,975.00
HRA
it
Lawn sprinkling sleeves
3,754.00
Staff
19
Stairway enclosure
3,900.00
HRA
32
Additional light pole bases
15,220.00
BRA
33
Chin link fenoe
3,859.00
HRA
36
Tree planter
2,638.00
Staff
74
Boulevard curb island
4,053.00
Omitted
74A
Ooncrete walkway waterproofing
5,447.00
Omitted
82A
Exposed aggregate islands
2,307.00
Staff
83
Cbnarrete insulation an bridge
12,440.00
Omitted
87
Sidewalk modifications
3,956.00
Omitted
88
Curb =difications /insulation
748.00
Omitted
89
Ent mnoe landing
5,009.00
witted
94
Drainage swale
835.00
Omitted
1941
Core Drill
305.00
Omitted
1943
Ramp beam pockets
20,000.00
Omitted
1945
Walk demolition
2,116.00
Omitted
1946
Snow removal
425.00
Omitted
Landscaping ooartract
56,132.00
Signage of rwW
28,350.00
Sealing of concrete
5,000.00
Staff
Ramp adjustment
29,202.00
Staff
Asphalt contract
12,565.00
Plaza Treee Replacement
8,262.00
Staff
Plaza Time Grates
9,850.00
Staff
Plaza landscaping Change
( 7,000.00)
Staff
Security System
11.000.00
S 231.348.00
REVISED ooNn ACT ANWNT $ 982.226.00
JGF /ts
1. wo
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jock Robertson, Executive Director HRA P6189 -199
TT47M: John G. Flora, Public Works Director
SATE: July 25, 1989
SUBJECT: Municipal Ramp Construction Summary Update
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT' $ 750, 8,8.00
Additions and Changes-
P. R. =
5
TV monitoring
$ 8,975.00
11
Lawn sprinkling sleeves
3,754.00
19
Stairway enclosure
3,900.00
32
Additional light pole bases
15,220.00
33
Chain link fence
3,859.00 X
36
Tree planter
2,638.00
74
Boulevard curb island
4,053.00
74A
Concrete walkway waterproofing
5,447.00
82
Exposed aggregate islands
2,307.00
83
Concrete insulation on bridge
12,440.00
87
Sidewalk modifications
3,956.00
88
C1irb modifications /insulation
748.00
89
Entrance laming
5,009.00
94
Drainage swale
835.00
Landscaping contract
56,132.00
Signage of ramp
28,350.00
Sealing of concrete
5,000.00
Ramp adjustment
29,202.00
Asphalt contract
12,565.00
1941
Core Drill
305.00
1943
Ramp beam packets
2,000.00
1945
Walk demolition
2,116.00
1946
Snow removal
425.00
4M
k0l,
S 209,236.00
REV= CDNIRACT ANDUNr fir. j 14.00
JGF /ts
6r ` pZ l C- �*L`1
3 -A
FJ
W�
3 -B
Proposal Request #36
The landscape concept as designed by the landscape architect required a cast -in -place
planter for the required plantings needed at gridline G between grids 14 and 15 over the
mechanical room #64. A prefabricated 5'x S planter was unavailable because of its size.
Therefore, we cast -in -place a 5' x 5', 36" inch deep planter with 4" thick sidewalls and
provided drain tile, waterproofing, and insulation as required. 5 2 , 63& . 00
Proposal Request #74 and 74A
Concrete curb at the south elevation of the parking facility between the parking facilih and
adjacent asphalt parking lot were changed from a B6y to a Bbl R. This provided a
boulevard type curb island with removable bollards at 10' on center including 3'4 diameter
chain barriers- strung from bollard to bollard. A credit for the original curb was provided
by Park Construction including a 2' wide strip of bituminous that was replaced with the
curbing. This credit was allowed at the time the asphalt work was bid in the spring. All of
these changes were requested by the Owner. 5 , 5 C � . 0 0
Proposal Request #82
This item was requested by the Owner and Architect to provide for exposed aggregate
concrete finish to cap the parking ramp boulevards. Original documents showed this as
crushed rock; landscape drawings show this area to be a brick paver material. The final
conclusion was to handle this area with exposed concrete aggregate. 2,307.00
3 -C
Proposal Request #83
Pedestrian bridge changes were required after further clarifications of the pedestrian bridge
spanning the alley between the Fridley Civic Center and the Target parking lot as described
by Bakke Koppe. This work included the addition of foundation walls, footings and grade
beam including reinforcing steel. The work also included the removal of the northern span
of precast plank. removing curbs and foundation wall that supported the northern end of
the existing precast, removal of planting bed materials, cutting riglets in walls for
waterproof membrane, providing tapered insulation at roof of police garage, relocation of
an existing light fixture, and the addition of one section of horizontal hand railing to meet
OSHA code for hand railing height. The reinsulation of the garage roof and relocation of
the existing light fixture were requested by the Owner. 5.1 , y 4 0
Proposal Request #87
Replaced side•..alk and peers in plaza area of the colonnade sidewalk which %& as disp:sced
due to excavation for the addition of the south colonnade footing and piers required to
suppon colonnade steel. This proposal request was required due to the lack of
coordination by the former Construction Manager to provide sheering and shoring to
protect additional sidewalks areas when excavation was in process 3, 956. 0 0
Proposal Request #89
Owner requested changes to curb line plus exterior concrete stoop at police entry, door
051B; including waterproofing and insulation of the pedestrian bridge and grouting the
precast plank next to poured curb area. 51009. 0 0
Proposal Request #t94
Delete the planting beds and shrubbery along the south elevation of the building at the south
vestibule entry and to provide PVC sleeving for lawn irrigation system and provide
concrete to fill in between sidewalk and building. A credit for the planting beds, shrubs,
mulch and irrigation heads were provided under the landscape bid package. Owner
requested item. E J J. 0 0
OUSNG and REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
4
COMMISSION MEMBERS: LAWRENCE COMMERS, CHAftMAN
BUANE PRARE VOGNIA SCNNABEL WALTER RASMUSSEN JOHN MEYER
CITY OF FRIDLEY
DATE: September 8, 1989
TO: Housing and Redevelopment Authority
FROM: Jock Robertson, Executive Director of HRA
SUBJECT: Bids for Anti- Graffiti Sealer on Parking Ramp
As authorized by the HRA on August 10, 1989, we have advertised and
received bids for a clear anti - graffiti sealer to be applied to the
lower ramp level. The bid amounts vastly exceed the estimate
originally made for white paint for the ramp. (See attached summary
from Kraus Anderson.)
Tom Sackett, the Construction Manager, has voiced the opinion that
alternatives of a much lower cost are available. I wish to discuss
this with him at the Construction Coordination meeting Monday
afternoon, September 11, and I will bring you some updated
information at our meeting on Thursday, September 14.
JR:ls
M -89 -545
f TIVE DIRECTOR: JOCK ROBERTSON 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. (4 12) 571 -3450
RRIDLEY, MN 55432 EXT. 117
4 -A
KRAUS- ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
CONTRACTORS 6 CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
September 6,1989
Mr. John Flora
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue NE
Fridley, NIN 55432
Re: Fridley Civic Center
Fridley, Minnesota
K/A Project No. 3789
Proposal Request No. 98
Dear Mr. Flora:
Subject: Apply A Graffiti Proof Clear Coating
In accordance with the above subject matter, we request that you approve a change
order ADD in the following amounts:
Cost "A" - FORTY -FIVE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED AND N01100
DOLLARS ($45,800.00)
Cost "B" - SEVEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED EIGHTY AND N01100
DOLLARS ($7,580.00)
This quotation is valid until September 18, 1989.
Enclosed is our backup data to justify the amount of this request.
Vera' truly yon,
COMPANY
Thomas J.
Project ME
TJS:ng
Enclosures William W. Bums date
City Manager
CC. Jon Rall
Rick Pribyl
Brian Turnquist
MINNEAPOLIS DIVISION
52.5 SOUTH EIGHTH STiliEET, MINNEAPOUS, MINNESOTA 55404 PHONE 612 - 332 -7281
��, Equal OppMnft Employer
1711 `
GUILLAUME & ASSOC.
Proposal
=:_11
•
Page No 1
of 1 Pages
Commercial and Industrial Painting Contractors
12955 16th Avenue North • Plymouth, MN 55441 9 612 - 557 -0100
PHONE DATE
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO August 29, 1989
JOB NAME
� Fridley Civic Center
Kraus - Anderson Minneapolis STREET
525 South 8th Street _
Minneapolis, MN 55404 CITY STATE
Attn: Tom Sackett
ARCHITECT I DATE OF PLANS
We hereby submit specifications and estimates for
GUILLAUME & ASSOCIATES, INC. is pleased to quote the following prices to
apply 2 coats Ty -Cote (primer) and 2 coats Graffitti Gard (finish) as per
manufacturers recommendation for proposal request No. 98. i
Cost "A" - Walls, ceiling beams, underside of deck at lower level ramp..
................ ............................... $45,800.00
Cost "B" - Interior and exterior of precast panels, light pole bases,
entire parking structure except deck surfaces... $7,580.00
All material Is guaranteed to be as specified All work to be completed In a workmanlike manner according to standard practices Any
alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs. will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an
extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes. accidents or delays beyond our control. Owners
to carry fire. tornado and other necessary insurance Our workers are fully covered by Workmen's Compensation Insurance
Payment Terms: Authorized Signature \Ld
Due Upon Completion Kelli La son
NOTE This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within days
Acceptance of Proposal
The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do
the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above.
Accepted
Signature
Date Signature
IOUSNG and REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
5
COMMISSION MEMBERS: LAWRENCE COMMERS, CHARMAN
MANE PRARE VRMIIA SCHNABEL WALTER RASMUSSEN JOHN MEYER
CITY OF FRIDLEY
DATE: September 7, 1989
TO: Housing and Redevelopment Authority
r FROM: Jock Robertson, Executive Director of HRA
SUBJECT: Ron Clark Project Proposal for Southwest Quadrant
On August 10, 1989, the HRA authorized staff to undertake a
preliminary analysis of the Ron Clark Construction proposal to
develop approximately 50,000 sq. ft. of retail space and a three
story, 100 -unit apartment development.
In Jim Casserly's analysis, he assumed that the retail space would
pay $2.75 per sq. ft. and the apartment units would pay $1,200 per
unit per year in taxes. He indicates the amount available for
developer reimbursement would be $1,599,750.
The Clark project is very comparable to the Tanurb project. Both
projects would have generated in excess of $4,000,000 of tax
increment through the year 2007. Both would have approximately
$1,600,000 available for developer reimbursement. Tanurb was to
pay $300,000 in special assessments and purchase the City's land
for $580,000. After payment of the City's bond and the special
assessments, Tanurb was to receive the balance of the taxes by a
revenue note.
The Clark proposal will have all the same problems as the Tanurb
proposal, however, if Ron Clark were to make essentially the same
offer as Tanurb, the HRA might find the project acceptable. We are
now waiting for Clark to conclude their financial analysis of the
proposal based on Casserly's data and will keep the HRA informed.
JR:ls
M -89 -536
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: JOCK ROBERTSON 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. MI 2) 571 -3450
FRIDLEY, MN 55432 EXT. 117
ALTAS 5=A
DEVELOPMIE
c o rporati
n
BUSINESS AND REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT
- OMAN
PROPOSAL OF ATLAS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
FOR DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF
A RETAIL /HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
1. INTRODUCTION.
We are pleased to submit this proposal to the City of Fridley ( "City ")
to assist the City in the development, construction, marketing and management
of a retail and housing development ( "Project ") on the property located at
the southwest corner of University Avenue Northeast and Mississippi Street
Northeast.
Atlas Development Corporation is a joint venture between Dunbar Development
Corporation and Ron Signorelli. We would serve as Project Coordinator to
assist the City in the formulation and realization of the Project. We have
significant development experience and expertise in the areas of regulatory
and governmental approvals, structuring of development financing, coordination
of architectural and engineering design, construction supervision and marketing
and management, all of which will enable the Project to be a success. We
also have unique experience in utilizing essential function bonds which we
are proposing as financing for the Project. The Project and essential function
bond financing are explained in greater detail below.
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION.
Our initial concept for the Project would include approximately 160 resi-
dential units, 360 parking stalls, 160 of which would be underground and enclosed,
and 50,000 square feet of retail space. The retail portion of the Project
would be located at the corner of the Property with good street access and
visibility and the residential units would be set back further on the Property
for a more secluded and private setting. The income restriction currently
associated with the essential function bonds program would enable the Project
to provide quality, market -rate units.
This conceptual description is obviously very preliminary. Prior to
finalization of the design concept, we and DDC, together with the City would
spend considerable time with a selected market analyst and architectural firm
to ensure that the Project best addresses the market needs and enhances the
community.
1128 Harmon Place * Suite 304 • Minneapolis. MN 55403 • (612) 338 -7640
R
.�
Proposal of Atlas Development Corporation
August 18, 1989
Page 2
3. PROJECT STRUCTURE.
We are proposing the use of essential function bonds as the financing
for the Project. They are formally known as the Multifamily Governmental
Housing Revenue Bond Program. Under the program, the City (or related govern-
ment entity) would own the Project and would finance all of its development
costs through the issuance of tax exempt bonds. Debt service payments on
100% of the bonds are insured through a HUD co- insurance program. Under this
program, HUD insures approximately 85% and an approved private co- insurer
insures approximately 15% of the debt service amounts. Therefore, there is
minimum risk to the City for bond debt service payments.
The advantages for the Project and City by utilizing essential function
bonds are simply stated as follows:
1. Because the bonds will be tax exempt for federal income tax purposes,
a lower interest rate will be obtained on the financing.
2. Because the bonds are essential function bonds, the interest paid
thereon would generally not be a tax preference item included in
the calculation of a bond holder's alternative minimum tax, again
permitting a lower interest rate on the financing.
3. Because the City is the owner of the Project, it will make payments
in lieu of real estate taxes which will be less than the taxes on
comparable privately owned developments. This obviously helps to
hold down operating expenses for the Project, which reduces the
risk of operating shortfalls and permits lower rents for the tenants.
4. Because the City is a government entity and exempt from sales tax
requirements, the purchase of materials used to build the Project
will be tax exempt. This savings accrues directly to lower Project
costs and, therefore, lower rents.
5. Because the City is the owner of the Project, at the time the City
determines it is appropriate to sell the Project to an institution
or other member of the private sector, it will enjoy the benefit
of any appreciation on the value of the Project. The bonds may
be prepaid in the event of sale of the Project.
The risk to the City in owning the Project would be its responsibility
to fund any unanticipated operating shortfalls. An initial amount would be
budgeted in the bond amount to fund shortfalls during the initial lease -up
period, but the City exposure would arise if shortfalls continued after that
budgeted deficit was exhausted. The likelihood of these shortfalls will be
minimized by the reduced payments in lieu of real estate taxes and through
the use of an aggressive, performance- compensated marketing and management
company. Tax increment funds from other redevelopment projects could also
be pledged to reduce any shortfalls.
5C
Proposal of Atlas Development Corporation
August 18, 1989
Page 3
4. PROJECT COORDINATION.
Because the City may not have the practical expertise or the staff to
effectively develop, market and manage the Project and implement the essential
function bond financing, it is recommended that the City hire Atlas Development
Corporation as Project Coordinator. We have worked extensively with Miller &
Schroeder Financial and the Washington County HRA to implement an essential
function bond program similar to the one- -described in this proposal. In addi-
tion to arranging the financing, we would also be responsible for advising
the City regarding the acquisition of the land, engineering and design, zoning
compliance, construction, marketing and management for the project.
We, as Project Coordinator, would be compensated on a fee basis as a
consultant and would have no ownership interest in the Project. Compensation
for we would be tied to achievement of certain performance standards so as
to provide adequate incentive for us to ensure a quality Project for the City.
5. CONCLUSION.
The increasing difficulty of the private sector to provide quality, yet
affordable, housing, makes it necessary for the City to take affirmative measures
to ensure that an adequate supply of affordable housing is available. This
proposal attempts to provide the City with a program to provide those housing
opportunities within the community. The program is a complicated one and
we encourage the City to engage knowledgeable bond counsel to advise the City
on the legal intracacies of the essential function bond program. We request
the opportunity to participate in any future presentations to City officials
concerning the Project. We will contact you within the next week to answer
any questions or comments you may have concerning the proposal.
We look forward to working with the City to realize this Project.
A
IOUSNG and REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
6
COMMISSION MEMBERS: LAWRENCE COMMERS, CHARMAN
DUANE PRARE 1 O WMA SCHNABEL W ALTER RASMUSSEN JOHN MEYER
CITY OF FRIDLEY
DATE: September 7, 1989
TO: Housing and Redevelopment Authority
FROM: Jock Robertson, Executive Director of HRA
SUBJECT: Proposed Pro - Engineering Manufacturing Facility
At the August 10, 1989, meeting, the HRA authorized staff to
proceed with a feasibility study and outline of a potential
development agreement with this firm. At this time, Mr. Marvin J.
Schmidtz, President of the firm, is negotiating for an option on
the proposed site. If successful in securing a price, Mr. Schmidtz
has said he would be more interested in our TIF grant assistance
to run 3 -5% of the total project cost as opposed to a 10 -15% second
mortgage. He is also looking into additional financing through an
SBA 504 loan for part of the project costs and new capital
equipment.
At this time, it appears that if successful, the project would be
constructed in the spring of 1990. I will continue to monitor this
application and keep the HRA informed.
JR:Is
M -89 -537
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: JOCK ROBERTSON 0431 UNIVERSITY AVE. MI 2) 571 -3450
FRIDLEY, MN 55432 EXT. 117
6127845370
rX U P- S-89 WED 1 4: 4 9 ROYAL. E L E C T R I C Co. P.02
r
1
_Z
�z
W
C
O
[o
EO+
u
�
f
'
aj
�
.r
e
W
r,. • •;
��
a
QI
I
�
uu
V
o
H
S
=�
oil I
I
d
I
Z
If
CN
g
• i
y
Inl
I
_Z
�z
W
C
R
0
w
ui
f--
a
U
J
CL
0
. n
O
[o
EO+
u
�
f
'
0
e
I
uu
R
0
w
ui
f--
a
U
J
CL
0
. n
n
a
FROM: City of Fridley Engineering Division
TO: honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Fridley
1431 biversity Avenue N.E.
Fridley, lissesota 55432
DATE: SEPTEMBER 14, 1989
CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC VORKS DEPARTMENT
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432
RE: Estimate No. 5
triad 8 -15-89 to
. 1 -15-89
FS: WIEENMASTERS INC.
WATERFORD PARK
515 HISHMAY 1 169 NO.
PLYMOUTH MN. 55441
LAKE POINTE DEVELOPMENT MAINTENANCE PROJECT #187
STATEMENT OF NORK
ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY THIS TOTAL
CONTRACT ITEM QUANTITY PRICE UNIT ESTIMATE TOTAL AMOUNT
Maintenance Services
--------------- -
TOTAL -----
1.88 34,226.89 LUMP SUM 1.143 1.715 24,442.86
$24,442.86
`SUMMARY;
Original Contract Mount
Contract Additions
Contract Deductions
Revised Coetract Amomnt
Value Completed To Date
Mount Retained To Date (52)
Less Amount Paid Previously
AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE
CERTIFICATE OF THE CONTRACTOR {
8 -A
$34,228.)0
f1. M
se.�e
$1.18
$19,554.28
$1,222.14
f18,516.56
$4,644.14
I hereby certify that the Mark performed and the materials supplied to date under the tens of the contract for this
project, and all authorized changes thereto, have an actual value under the contract of the amounts shorn on this
estimate (and the final quantities on the final estimate are correct), and that this estimate is just and correct and no
part of the mount Due This Estimate' has been received.
By -v - -� =J -- -- Date -� - - - --
Contractor's Authorized Re enta ve (Title)
CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER
1 hereby certify that I have prepared or examined this estimate, and that the contractor is entitled to payment of this
estimate under the contract for reference project.
CITY OF FRIDLEY, INSPECTOR
By
/PPRPASEI•AS
RPASE2'ABP
RPAK3'ASPP
Date ---! _ -� l U
Respectfully Submitted,
6.
lie Frs Ia�P.E.
Macke
CLAIMS
(AT MEETING)
�m
�i
ro
rf'
�P
00
P)
(D
c�
IOU
�a
�w
rt 00
o ko
m�
fiC,
wPIV
4�
H Ul
A7 [F
Q U
�1vV4
trJ
a
ro
P- a
(D
ED
W
�n
0
(rt(pp
fi
rt
c�
18
rt
rt
(D
R
rt
a
W
�n
110 d
m
O
�n
�i
I-h
H _
trt
f D z �'
0
cn
d m
o� N
0
rl a
rt �
H Q1
N
� o
St
a
w
N
N
bCD
C-
m
rn
T
_ter
r
v
3
t'f'1
r
m
z
0
x
a
T
0
0
z
rn
can
f �i
G)
�
Z
O
N
�m
�i
ro
rf'
�P
00
P)
(D
c�
IOU
�a
�w
rt 00
o ko
m�
fiC,
wPIV
4�
H Ul
A7 [F
Q U
�1vV4
trJ
a
ro
P- a
(D
ED
W
�n
0
(rt(pp
fi
rt
c�
18
rt
rt
(D
R
rt
a
W
�n
110 d
m
O
�n
�i
I-h
H _
trt
f D z �'
0
cn
d m
o� N
0
rl a
rt �
H Q1
N
� o
St
a
w
N
N
bCD
C-
m
rn
T
_ter
r
v
3
t'f'1
r
m
z
0
x
a
T
0
0
z
rn
can
f �i
OMI
qo
CA
Z ;J
•
•
•
iF
M
[j
'e l l
tow
n
&
g $ g L4
Own x
FE
�R a� 116111 ye, �ee: Ps o
pr
'� vru;� ayeoi Q IRS. 811
c. X03 - a°,'g:,S3
nq nJ' w
z 7an CIE _ •v it ou
i 8-
•v z ^y'" z
°raXL °►�
�� .' O -i'° 2 � c 3e+�i � � 7��rr �. •dry_ W fE � ^ � 7m Sc � �� �%� ���J,O
y R 00 � f•'9 p7 O � 00 � Fil VJ C "� y Vl '� •1 —'• �i (� CY � d, � ff �, —• � n �
c boo ac ay i'S m 3 3 ° rr
O=Q x �c d— ' o v y ' >- w
aoo a E �
c—.—
agu, n ;, Z
o. o
� ° MR R w,
• o .o Cv s
o
,�
w
Acn.o 0o 72 5'o eo
kb
•� 3 •+, o a •o g "Pao =0
my
ad
emu'
7 9 � w r �3 w� •�
av Oa Ig
�EE w
� S- 7 � a `•
sg ao�°o ewe ra bi
Aw, nEA .91 OPUS CORP.
+ h
r
I
s
A
g
A
w
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
FwTMair
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 13, 1989
TO: Housing & Redevelopment Authority Members
Planning Commission Members
FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development
Director /Executive Director of the HRA
SUBJECT: Status of the Contamination Testing at 57th
Place N.E.
On Monday, September 11, 1989 I received an update from Mary
Siedlecki of Delta Environmental, concerning progress on the bores
and testing at the site. Ms. Siedlecki reported that the
additional bore on the site in the tank basin area hit contaminated
soil. But, they found no ground water contamination, which she
characterized as unusual and unexpected.
In the monitoring well on the 57th Street right -of -way north of
SuperAmerica, they found no contaminated soil. Similarly, at the
monitoring well on the University Avenue right -of -way east of
Hardees Restaurant, no contaminated soil was found. The
groundwater testing will be done in mid - September when the
groundwater system stabilizes after being disturbed by the bore
holes being drilled.
The schedule for completion anticipates the water quality results
being returned by mid - October. An additional three weeks will then
be required to complete the written report which will be forwarded
to Art Nuby at Rapid Oil approximately the second week in November.
Based on past experience, Iris. Siedlecki estimates that it will take
Mr. Nuby one and a half to two weeks to review the written report
and pass it on to the Pollution Control Agency. This would then
bring us into the end of November.
JLR/dn
M -89 -555
Engineering
Sewer
Waler
Parks
Sireels
Maintenance
MEMORANDUM
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager PW89 -343
FROM: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director
DATE: September 12, 1989
SUBJECT: Municipal Center Construction Status
At the Construction Meeting of September 11, 1989, the following
items were brought forward and are submitted for your information:
1. Country Cabinets is behind schedule in completing the
recreation front counter. It is hoped that they will make
delivery by September 19. This is a major item which will
effect the completion of the Recreation area.
2.
4 Lkc> *3
Kraus - Anderson Const. Co. is contacting Country Cabinets
bonding company in an attempt to obtain quicker response and
more corrective actions by the company.
Boarman & Associates is to follow up with Bakke -Koppe in
determining when the parking ramp concrete corrective action
is to be initiated. At this point, it is unsure if they
desire to complete it this month or to delay the work until
next spring.
4. The sheet metal contractor will be requested to investigate
the HVAC unit servicing the Council Chambers to determine if
the unit needs adjustment or if a vibration barrier can be
installed in the duct work to eliminate the noise and
vibration in the Council Chambers.
5. Boarman & Associates will attempt to receive a second quote
for the anti - graffiti painting of the ramp.
6. The Police lockers are due in on or about September 19.
7. The Police have proposed that they will be painting the
holding cell bunks.
8. Current plans call for moving the Recreation Department to
ll their area on or after September 27.
cmp�
FRID�LIY
J
I� Draft 3/12/86
a
l
AGREEMENT
By and Between
THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
And
VANTAGE PROPERTIES, INC.
J
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
Herrick 6 Newman P.A.
6279 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
Section 4.3. Commencement and Completion of
Construction. Subject to Unavoidable Delays, the Company
shall commence construction of the Minimum Improvements to
be constructed on Parcel I within 120 days of execution of
this Agreement and on Parcel II within 60 months of eiFecu-
tion of this Agreement or on such other date as the Parties
shall mutually agree in writing. Subject to Unavoidable
Delays, the Company shall have substantially completed the
construction of the Minimum Improvements on Parcel I within
9 months of the date of this Agreement and on Parcel II'
within 72'months of the date of this Agreement.
Section 4.4. Uses. It is agreed that on the Southeast
Parcel there shall not be located or constructed any busi-
ness or building that engages in automotive or motor vehicle
repairs or service, or that sells gasoline, fuels or motor
vehicle parts.
Section 4.5. Setback. It is agreed that the "setbacks"
(as used in the Fridley Zoning Code) for Parcels I and II
along the service road(and 81st Avenue shall be as indicated
in the Development Plan. All other setbacks shall be as
provided in the Fridley Zoning Code.
Section 4.6. Billboard. It is agreed that the bill-
board currently leased to Naegele and located adjacent to
University Avenue on the Development Property shall be
removed at no expense to the City on or before
December 31, 1986.
4 - 2
J
rt
7
I
f
i
i
{I e 1 i � ? + Vii? -t ! •
gut 5ME1
t1- -+--r– - --rte•' _ rte.
jl'�';.. � ems— __�� •�.��� � �. :�r � • &� {'
`III--= -_ —•rm _�,. _ � Eae S -� � ,_-
��• I. i ' i �i�60 • C
_–_ 111 ,• 1 d•� • �m i
;
Off, 2 $ r �•• i i I .t
IL
z ! 1 ! � •i it �. � � a 6 v t >. � � � I I I , r! 1 �
� 1 :1•: :` •�i • u .gym t � 1p �i ' 1. ° c
' •� 1 1 • ,1 V I. H I • �
r Iii • i i E �. d 1+ - • I.1 r
+� ! iii i I +� e• �II11 Il��llJlj '; I ;�x
`• i i 11 I I.Or - I •
Ell i
10 2
R� ; • , I I � •1 4�yA �� r 1 1 I I '
F • •f `• I �, 4 a
�� I , �.. s • �•• ! a� O i•• III'• t t�l f4 • u a _ .' 1
•. �! 1� is � 1�{ iJ � - •�
alb 1 f i (f �•• g
(� MI l ? •`c s` a ON
400-
m +�' 1. r a i �� / A r 1
m ° :..0�. if . 1:y p m—Ilr "f ° i. I ►i; o
m e
.r
• m I , ' � r r . � � i � S• i�tf�c'[ (. 9= !� i ! � �=I =r�� ��{j t� Sri ti '•
� �. � : • t � � >i,:l >, is a ;f.i �e:'s,t; ; ; , t r j >f /r� 11 � jf rg tt =
CA
� •: D ' n � � 6 � � :.. g � 1 �'g A j`r(t
11 r e a ► t =�` t g ( r r (g i o 'i ;�:4 =.a= �. tr'
Z 1 t =(
a
Z. ~M - McDonald
m- •- ..yam _ ..._ +� - --
t MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT
a r GIST STREET 8 UMVERSITY AVE i
RIDL r MN
J SITE PLAN
St. Paul Port Authority
1900 Landmark Tower
345 St. Peter Street
St. Paul, MN 55102
Phone: 612 -224 -5686
Contact: William E. McGivern
TTM OF OIIIBO/RliNtY OFFICE buildings approved
or under construction, 350,000 sq. ft.
INDUSTRIAL buildings approved or under con-
struction, 100,000 sq. ft. SHOW?ECH buildings
approved or under construction, 150,000 sq. ft.
> u AlRAtil15 MW SW= KfR1Mi TM PARL•
Midway location, direct freeway access to
both CBDs, all roads and utilities in.
NUM TMUWM Opus Corporation, Midway
National Bank, Impressions Inc., Northern
Potato.
WESTGATE OFFICE PLAZA
University Avenue and Highway 280
St. Paul, MN
WM AMA: 12 acres
ORIMA/ MR0110t:
Opus Corporation
9900 Bren Road East
Minnetonka, MN 55343
Phone: 612-936-4570
Contact: Marc Anderson
TTMOfOSYBOi'I :OFFICE 4buildings
approved or under construction, 350,000 sq. ft.
WWAt AABKTES ARM SA1f1= Rt1T1l1 TM PARK:
Currently located in Midway area.
WESTPOINT BUSINESS
CENTER
13895 Industrial Park Boulevard
Plymouth, MN
TMIKAN& 15 acres
Vantage Companies
11095 Viking Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Phone: 612-944-1000
Contact: Wade Lau
TMOI09YB OFFICE: 1 existing building,
16,413 sq. ft. INDUSTRIAL: 2 existing buildings.
63,550 sq. ft. sHowrrECH: 2 existing buildings,
81,030 sq. ft.
PICK A M S@YIQS tllTlll♦ TM PARK:
Free parking, freeway visibility, variety of
suite sizes.
NAM TMAKIS: ETS, Waymouth Farms, Kloster
Corporation.
WILSON RIDGE
7500 Flying Cloud Drive
Eden Prairie, MN
TO U AMA: 10 acres
OWNULGIVROM
Ryan Properties Inc., general partner
900 Second Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Phone: 612-339-9847
Contact: Bill McHale
TM OFOIYBOPRR#T:OFFICE: 1 existing building,
215,000 sq. ft. sHowrrECH: 1 existing building,
75,000 sq. ft.
SPROAI AR M 00 $BMW RllTtlO TIE PARK:
Surrounded by natural lakes and woods, sand-
wich shop, health facility, retail shops within
development, underground heated parking.
free covered- surface parking.
■AIORTEAM Wilson Learning Center;
Boeckermann, Heinan & Mayer: The Sand-
wich Factory Inc.
WINDSOR OFFICE PARK
Long Lake Road and County Road B
Roseville, MN
MOLL AMA: S acres
OR#1111LOWNWIft
�Scllel Development
Opportunities
At I -694, University & Central Avenues:
A&j'- valw�
TARGET NORTHERN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
ONE MILLION + SQUARE FEET
525 EMPLOYEES
Fridley is alive with development opportunities for investors, developers
and businesspeople. Call: Jock Robertson, Community Development
Director (612) 571 -3450
for the future
efD�
V`'_ V
G UTYOF FRIDLEY rl _
Glacier Park Company
2000 Foshay Tower
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Phone: 612 -782 -3010
Contact: Rod Dolan
Excellent visibility from Interstate 35W, close
to Rosedale Mall.
WOODDALE
INDUSTRIAL PARK
Interstate 494 and Afton Road
Woodbury, MN
WIXRJEL 132 acres
GUIELVIVROPER:
Opus Corporation
9900 Bren Road East
Minnetonka, MN 55343
Phone: 612-936-4444
Contact: Marc Anderson
TTMOFOI11BOPOTT:OFFICE: 13 existing;
buildings, 350,000 sq. ft.. I building approved
or under construction, 10,000 sq. ft. INDUSTRIAL:
3 existing buildings, 365,000 sq. ft.
SHOwrrECH: 1 existing building, 50,000 sq. ft.;
1 building approved or under construction,
23,000 sq. ft. RETAIL,RECREATION 2 existing
buildings, 70,000 sq. ft. HOTEL I existing
building, 40,000 sq. ft.
SPEW ANEUM AM SUrAW RIRFrI TW PAM:
Excellent visibility and access.
Y TOIUWM-3M, Red Roof Inn. Old MCXWO
Restaurant, Norris Creamery. Minnesota Farm
Bureau, State Farm Insurance, Wooddale
Recreation Center, The joint Commission on
Allied Personnel in Ophthalmology
YANKEE PLACE
3500 Comsery Drive
Eagan, MN
TOM AMA: 22 acres
elayvfe
otealfs
BUSINESS
Call about our
new Corporate Art
Leasing Program
Winner of 1989
Decor Magazine
Award of Excellence
NOW OPEN IN
GAVIIDAE COMMON
Call 338 -1092 or 926 -1511
ELAYNE OF GALLERIES
6111 Excelsior Blvd.
St. Louis Park
926 -1511
CORPORATE REPORT MINNESOTA 119
0
Z
f�A
H
d
3
if a Jul
HIM
foi�
if 11 A' 1111111111-
_ r1! A
lilt. I_
i op_ 1 11, - - a
t:b W ! -Hill �42i ills
ls��
fie
jig
al
it
Hi �� OU ffit; MH j ti Y
Iff fl[,Q-M
a
$� Y Y 31 v (d
A !s M_
a
O
n
O
C
m
A
w
�s a a�Min3$�� I
lit Ir1111YE�
MT
!• €�gGa�[� >1-�� $
YO�� iaa6i3 �e fix LA•d'Zy�c�'SN A �$gZ.mg,�.3
fig?, 9 N _Ylg C
yy y ss Y w iY g o igi 8z
is -M iffIrtl
�zS -BYgg g�yy �gyy � �a��b � �Rf �. 7}j�_,�I �. ,� 'Y����$ 3�� � 0•� �' `
s� ue i$$ geld �g
a
B_
0
q
c