Loading...
HRA 01/11/1990 - 6385_ f fi fps 1 WA 4 � i'�..X z f yff AST jx »V ATA "TAB r } ' rt� 3 v REV t _ z d d' All IVY ' ',: AW N oil A Now �. c ZVI QTY l Y'11.Y[ M & t o A 3 k DII;ECMR OF HRA NOR , �. S .• Coy T e A yy b 'K5- t,wh i a _ f fi fps 1 WA 4 � i'�..X z f yff AST jx »V ATA "TAB r } ' rt� 3 v REV City of Fridley A G E N D A HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MTG. JAN. 11, 1990 7:00 P.M. Location: Fridley Municipal Center 6431 University Avenue N.E. City Council Chambers CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 14, 1989 ACTION PENDING• UTILITY ASSISTANCE FOR PROPOSED PRO ENGINEERING PLANT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 - 1D 1990 BUDGET PRIORITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 - 2E URBAN COMMERCIAL DEVELOPERS, INC., PROPOSAL TO REDEVELOP 10,000 AUTO PARTS SITE . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 - 3D BID PACKAGE FOR 1990 LAKE POINTE MAINTENANCE. . . . . . . .4 - 4Q RESOLUTION DESIGNATING OFFICIAL DEPOSITORIES. . . . . . . .5 CLAIMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 INFORMATION• SENIOR HOUSING POLICY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 - 7A 57TH PLACE STATUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 - 8A OTHER BUSINESS ADJOURNMENT ,_�, CITY OF FRIDLEY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, DECEMBER 14, 1989 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r « r r r «rrr «« r r r r r r« r r« r« r r «« r« r r« r r r r r r r « r r r « r r« r CALL TO ORDER: Vice - Chairperson Schnabel called the December 14, 1989, Housing & Redevelopment Authority meeting to order at 7:15 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Virginia Schnabel, Duane Prairie, Walter Rasmussen Members Absent: Larry Commers, John Meyer Others Present: Jock Robertson, Executive Director of HRA Rick Pribyl, Finance Director Tim Turnbull, Public Safety Special Projects Coordinator Dave Newman, HRA Attorney Bruce Carlson, Northco Corporation APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 12 1989. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES• MOTION by Mr. Rasmussen, seconded by Mr. Prairie, to approve the October 12, 1989, Housing & Redevelopment Authority minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON CONNERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS FOR REDEVELOPMENT OF SOUTHWEST QUADRANT OF UNIVERSITY & MISSISSIPPI STREET BY: ATLAS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BOISCLAIR CORPORATION RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION. INC. Mr. Robertson stated that in the past two weeks, staff has received some information about an organization which is also interested in the southwest quadrant site. This organization has requested confidence about its identity at this point and additional time to prepare an outline of its proposal for this site. Staff has met with this organization's staff, and City staff feels the proposal is realistic enough to be considered. Secondly, the potential return on the investment to the City on this particular development would be substantially superior than the other three proposals for this site. He believed it would be in everyone's best interest to HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, DEC. 14, 1989 PAGE 2 r take the additional time to get this proposal developed and evaluated. Mr. Robertson stated staff has informed the three other developers of this new proposal, and they have acquiesced to not attend this meeting in order to give the City more time to evaluate this fourth proposal. He stated he anticipated this would take at -least 3 -4 months. He suggested the HRA table discussion on this item. MOTION by Mr. Prairie, seconded by Mr. Rasmussen, to table discussion of the proposals for redevelopment of the southwest quadrant of University and Mississippi. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE - CHAIRPERSON SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANINOUSLY. 2. CONSIDERATION OF CONCEPT OF PAY -AS- YOU -GO TIF ASSISTANCE TO PHASE III NORTHCO BUSINESS PARK: Mr. Robertson stated the HRA members received an outline of the proposal by Northco Business Park for Phase III of the development on the southeast quadrant of 73rd Avenue /University Avenue. As shown on agenda page 2 -E, Northco has purchased and begun redevelopment on the old Carter Day facility, characterized as Phase II of the new plat, which is between Carter Day and the frontage road. Mr. Robertson stated this particular proposal is for approximately a 2 1/2 acre site within the turnback loop between the frontage road and University Avenue. The proposal is for an 18,000 sq. ft., one story commercial /office building with the anchor tenant being a branch of Western State Bank. Mr. Robertson stated that regarding the soil conditions, the site is low and has wet soil that would have to be removed and backfilled. The estimate for that cost is $70,000. The site would also have to be raised a minimum of 2 feet for a cost of approximately $25,000. Mr. Robertson stated he has met with Mr. Bruce Carlson, Executive Vice President of Northco. Mr. Carlson has given staff some preliminary construction estimates. Mr. Carlson is at the meeting with some more detailed drawings, and he will give a brief outline summary of his proposal and answer any questions the HRA might have. Mr. Robertson stated the pay -as- you -go concept would be the same concept staff proposed for the SBF Cinemark development where essentially the HRA would give the grant, not at the time of the certificate of occupation of the building, but at the time the taxes are received which might be over a 2 -3 year period. There '1� HOUSING 6 REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, DEC. 14, 1989 PAGE 3 is no risk to the HRA, and it helps Northco with soil correction work. Mr. Carlson stated Northco has been redeveloping the old Chicago Northwestern site. They have been concerned about the possible development of this turnback site in front of their site because they wanted to hopefully encourage a quality development that would enhance their business park. The City recently wrestled with the Phillips Petroleum Company proposal for the possible use of this site for another filling station. He stated that from a planning standpoint, it was something neither the City nor Northco was interested in seeing go onto this site. Mr. Carlson stated Northco has been working with Mr. A. William Sands, Chairman of Western State Bank, and several other tenants to develop and design a building as a one -story business center. They hope to have tenants such as insurance offices, mortgage companies, perhaps some food, dental, medical, travel agency, real estate, printing. Mr. Carlson stated the entrance to the project would be off 73rd Avenue and off the frontage road in front of the industrial park. The building essentially orients itself to the two main streets, University Avenue and 73rd Avenue. The site will have adequate .-. parking. The main problem is the poor soil conditions. Mr. Carlson stated that with the HRA's assistance, they hope to be in a position by the spring of 1990 to go through all the necessary processes, get the project financed, and commence construction. He stated this is not a very large project, but a project they feel is very important for their business park. Ms. Schnabel asked why the site needs to be raised 2 feet. Mr. Carlson stated the site is like a dish and it has bad black soils. In order to get the building in the right location and to get good drainage, they need to raise the elevation of the site. Mr. Rasmussen stated this looks like a very good plan. Mr. Robertson stated one of the things the HRA is concerned about with any project is that it be a quality of development that is significantly different than the "run of the mill" building which might be built without financial assistance. Mr. Robertson stated Northco is getting ready to submit an application for a rezoning from manufacturing to commercial. Mr. Carlson stated they are not absolutely certain that this project even requires a rezoning, because the tenants may be business - oriented enough to fall under the M -2 zoning. They are doing the rezoning mainly to have the flexibility in the leasing. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NEETING, DEC. 14, 1989 PAGE 4 Mr. Robertson stated staff is recommending the HRA approve the project in concept and to authorize staff to start the mechanism to create an economic development district, give public notice, and have a public hearing before the City Council. That will take approximately 45 days from this point. MOTION by Mr. Prairie, seconded by Mr. Rasmussen, to approve the concept of "pay -as- you -go" TIP assistance to Phase III Northco Business Park, and to authorize staff to draft a development agreement and begin the process to set up an economic development district. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE - CHAIRPERSON SCffiWEL DECLARED THE NOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. CONSIDERATION OF PLAZA RAMP ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM: Mr. Robertson stated that in August 1989, Mr. William Burns had made a proposal to' the HRA to consider adding electronic surveillance to the ramp to be in the form of both a TV camera and sound monitoring equipment. At that time, the HRA authorized staff to advertise for bids and bring those bids back. Staff received one bid from Security World for a total of $10,973. Mr. Robertson stated Tim Turnbull is at the meeting to give any additional information needed. Staff is recommending approval of the bid. Mr. Turnbull stated the HRA has had several discussions on this particular project, and he was at the meeting to answer any questions the HRA members might have. He stated Security World is an excellent company. Security World and its subdivision, Access Control, is the company that provided the electronic security for the Municipal Center and the video security for the holding facility in the Police Department. The equipment met all the specifications. The company has installed and done whatever training was necessary, and there have been no problems. This company has performed very well under previous contracts and he would certainly recommend approval of the bid. MOTION by Mr. Rasmussen, seconded by Mr. Prairie, to receive the bid for the Parking Ramp Security Surveillance System from Security World, Inc., for a total of $10,973.00. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE - CHAIRPERSON SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION by Mr. Prairie, seconded by Mr. Rasmussen, to award the contract to Security World, Inc. (Access Control Tech.) for the Parking Ramp Security Surveillance system. 6 c11-� HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING. DEC. 14, 1989 PAGE 5 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE - CHAIRPERSON SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANINOUSLY. 4. CONSIDERATION OF PAYMENT OF RICE CREEK ROAD IMPROVEMENTS: Mr. Robertson stated this was on the November agenda, and there was no meeting. He stated he received a request from Larry'Commers asking staff to provide additional material on the history of the funding procedure for this project. He also prepared a little more background information with a map that was handed out at this meeting. Mr. Robertson stated that of the roughly $1,200,000 that was budgeted for the Rice Creek Road improvements (East Moore Lake Drive), the HRA will recover $714,000 over 13 years. The actual cost to the HRA is $1,058,858.43, and staff is recommending the HRA authorize a payment in that amount to the City of Fridley. Mr. Robertson stated $.14 million was approved in December 1986 as part of the HRA's conceptual 5 year capital improvement program. It was for the improvement of the intersection of Rice Creek Road and T.H. 65. He stated $.#6 million was approved in December 1987 for upgrading the stretch of Rice Creek Road which has been renamed East Moore Lake Drive in conjunction with the Moore Lake Commons Shopping Center development. The arrangements that were made for recovering part of that cost of the intersection and the road are shown on agenda page 4 -B. Essentially, as part of the development agreement, the developers agreed to pay back an assessment for those improvements totalling $714,000. That assessment is paid back over 13 years by the City and as the City collects that assessment, it is then turned back to the HRA account. MOTION by Mr. Rasmussen, seconded by Mr. Prairie, to authorize staff to issue a check to the City of Fridley in the amount of $1,058,858.43 for the Rice Creek Road improvements. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE - CHAIRPERSON SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. CONSIDERATION OF RECEIVING INFORMATIONAL ITEMS IN PACKET - NO ACTION REQUIRED: MOTION by Mr. Prairie, seconded by Mr. Rasmussen, to receive the following informational items: 1. Information on Crampton request to forgive remaining portion of mortgage 2. Information on 1990 meeting dates '� 3. Information on 57th Place redevelopment alternatives 9 HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING. DEC. 14, 1989 PAGE _6 4. Information on preliminary HRA budget for 1990 5. Information on proposed LRT stations at University Avenue at 57th Avenue and Mississippi Street 6. Information on Old Central Avenue Redevelopment Plan 7. Information on Americor proposal for southwest quadrant UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE - CHAIRPERSON SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The HRA members were in agreement with the 1990 meeting dates as proposed; however, they asked that all the members be polled before the next meeting regarding the meeting time. Mr. Robertson stated the preliminary HRA budget for 1990 will be an action item at the January meeting. He would like the members to review the budget and come back with ideas and priorities on the projects. Those projects noted with a * are projects most likely for consideration in 1990. 6. ESTIMATES• GREENMASTERS. INC. - TURF FERTILIZATION AT LAKE POINTE: MOTION by Mr. Prairie, seconded by Mr. Rasmussen, to approve the estimate in the amount of $400.00 for turf fertilization at Lake Pointe. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE - CHAIRPERSON SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. CLAIMS• MOTION by Mr. Rasmussen, seconded by Mr. Prairie, to approve the check register dated December 13, 1989. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE - CHAIRPERSON SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 8. OTHER BUSINESS: Mr. Robertson stated staff has been notified by their financial consultant, Jim Casserly, that there is some potential new interpretation of the statutes on the tax increment financing bonds which implies the possibility that in situations in pre -1979 districts, if the servicing of the bonds runs out by the year 2001, that is the end of the district. In the light of the discussion about a new development on the southwest quadrant, he has asked Mr. Casserly to look into what the HRA's options may be for extending O W HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, DEC. 14, 1989 PAGE 7 the life of that district by an additional bond sale. This information will be coming back to the HRA. Mr. Robertson stated the same thing is true of economic development districts. There may be some pending state legislation at the session that starts in February that will more restrict economic development districts. Although most of the City's districts are redevelopment districts, they do use economic development districts for soil correction. If, in the next month or so, it appears that there will be pending legislation that would somehow tie the HRA's hands in creating these districts, staff may come back to the HRA with some proposals that would preempt this legislation from cutting off that option. Mr. Pribyl called the HRA's attention to his memo to Jock Robertson dated December 8, 1989, re: Change in Methodology for Charging HRA for Administrative Staff Time. Mr. Robertson called the HRA's attention to a memo from William Burns dated December 14, 1989, giving the results of the December 11, 1989, Council Conference meeting on "TIF Guidelines for Senior Housing ". He would recommend the HRA review this memo and decide whether they want to adopt it as part of the policy for calendar year 1990 or whether they want to wait and consider it as part of an overall policy guide for the TIF program which is part of the 1990 workplan. No action is required at this time. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Mr. Rasmussen, seconded by Mr. Prairie, to adjourn the meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting ape, Vice- Chairperson Schnabel declared the December 14, 1989, Housing & Redevelopment Authority meeting adjourned at 8:20 p.m. Respectfully sub 'tted, Lytmffe Saba Recording Secretary OWING and REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1 COMMISSION MEMBERS: LAWRENCE COMMERS, CHAPMAN MUS PRA n1GM SCHNABEL wALTBI RASH SSEN JOHN METER CITY OF FRIDLEY DATE: January 4, 1990 TO: Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Jock Robertson, Executive Director of HRA SUBJECT: Proposed Pro - Engineering Manufacturing Facility Following HRA concept approval for TIF grant assistance for the proposed $1 million manufacturing facility, preliminary engineering studies have revealed that a storm sewer will have to be installed on Fireside Drive in front of the proposed site between Service America and Viking Chevrolet. The cost of the storm sewer will be approximately $26,000. Pro - Engineering President, Marvin Schmitz, initially requested that the HRA pay the cost of this storm sewer. Upon further negotiations, Mr. Schmitz has indicated he would be willing to pay half of the cost of the storm sewer; that is, $13,000 over the normal 20 year assessment period. At this time, staff recommends that this additional $13,000 be added to the package of the $50,000 grant upon certificate of occupancy of the project and that it be incorporated into the development agreement. Mr. Schmitz will be present at the meeting to provide further details about the proposed facility. JR:ls M -90 -07 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: JOCK ROBERTSON 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. (612) 571 -3450 FRIDLET9 MN 55432 EXT. 117 /11 1 OUSNG and REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1 -A COMMISSION MEMBERS: LAMIRENCE COMMERS, Cnft&AMAN MANE PRARE 1 OGMA SCHNABEL WALTER RASMUSSEN JOHN MEYER CITY OF FRIDLEY DATE: September 7, 1989 TO: Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Jock Robertson, Executive Director of HRA SUBJECT: Proposed Pro - Engineering Manufacturing Facility At the August 10, 1989, meeting, the HRA authorized staff to proceed with a feasibility study and outline of a potential development agreement with this firm. At this time, Mr. Marvin J. Schmidtz, President of the firm, is negotiating for an option on the proposed site. If successful in securing a price, Mr. Schmidtz has said he would be more interested in our TIF grant assistance to run 3 -5% of the total project cost as opposed to a 10 -15% second mortgage. He is also looking into additional financing through an SBA 504 loan for part of the project costs and new capital equipment. At this time, it appears that if successful, the project would be constructed in the spring of 1990. I will continue to monitor this application and keep the HRA informed. JR:Is M -89 -537 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: JOCK ROBERTSON 5431 UNIVERSITY AVE. ($12) 571 -3450 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 EXT. 117 O$T -23 -69 WED 16 23 OLSON co.. _ �'. � • P 03 �.7id:vest'CO- S.. -; a, $V I� r31J�t.yA13 �J E By _ ooa' ' !y O slur PEo- Zo�v,jar. ©ao. acs # Z3 40o a 3 2/ IOZ " r N OW.- 3ra OA4 grf 73, . , I 3 1,800j V/ t F �s 4 SL 1 0 foo 3 6,38 o a' — •, n \ r AS 4T . A rR4cf/4 O� Ok N I �EA/e, �Now°.R�I •'�S'O Jr1 r�e�S p�� C>Tr dc? _ S � 0 t3 ,(e-4.5 1 rp /.7 s.� 0 !f s• 0 r i o� 1 -C D10 P eto engineering, incorporated 9444 deerwood lone • maple grove, minnesoto 55369 • (612) -425 -1618 August 91 1989 Mr. Jock Robertson Executive Director FRIDLEY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Pr.,3p ct t.: .v l..pr.:crit rite ide Dri4:. , Fridley Dear Jock; As discussed, Pro Engineering, Inc. is interested in building a new facility for its operation at 1201 Fireside Drive in Fridley. This is a 1.85 acres parcel between Service America Corporation and Viking Chevrolet. The building would be an approximate 24,000 square foot facility with a total development cost of around $1,000,000.00. Pro Engineering is a 15 -year old, long and short run metal stamp- ing operation which currently does business in eighteen states. The company will employ between 16 to 26 people. Our operation is well within all municipal noise pollution and hazardous sub- stance requirements. Pro Engineering currently owns and occupies a 14,000 square foot building in Maple Grove. One simple alternative would be to add on to this facility. However, as a Fridley resident, I would like to pursue moving the business closer to home. It appears that the financial incentive program offered by the Fridley HRA would make this move feasible. However without such a package, considering the moving costs: rewiring, replumbing & etc. of all the manufacturing equipment we now use, adding on in Maple Grove or building in another nearby community would clearly be more practical. Jock, I look forward to hearing from you and the Fridley HRA shortly. Sincerely _ Mar n J. Schmidtz Pres. MJS /rlj long & short run metal stampings complete tooling facilities 1 -D , _�- r s )INWAL r . Pro Engineering, Inc. was founded in 1973 andal that limewe look a the stance that we would provide Quality, Dependability and r "Quick Service ". As a Metal Stamping Vendor we offer these in a order to alleviate long lead time which allows our Customers to cut down on costly inventories and line shut down while awaiting P Engineering enjoyed Y , � 11 `,• arts. As a result, Pro En ineerin has en'o ed seven ears of con- (� \ tinuous growth and a list of satisfied customers that will attest to f ` the quality and service we strive for. \. We now operate in our own 14,000 sq. ft. plant with eighteen punch 1 presses ranging up to 110 ton capacity and complete Tool Room facilities. With my 16 years of personal experience as a Tool and Die Maker and coupled with our experienced personnel, we can provide quality and cost saving ideas in both temporary and per- manenl Stamping Dies. We have accepted the challenge of short lead times and challenge / you to give us the opportunity to demonstrate what we can do. ' We need you not only for today but to be our satisfied customer to row with us tomorrow. ZIA lb Luigi Of 10 1!�m;mm6wmm"g 1 !061:; stirelz %+f {. �� r`, ti�•�• I -- � -/� dam. -^!� '. i �, �4� - .+a FiF •.• i• `�.�. Y _ c•.i T . �O pro engineering, incorporated 9444 deerwood lone • mople grove, minnesoto 55369 • (612) -425 -1618 w OUSNG and REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2 COMMISSION MEMBERS: LAW ENCE COMMERS, CHARMAN SIA1E PRAlIE VIROMA SCHNABEL WALTER RASMUSSEN JOHN MEYER CITY OF FRIDLEY DATE: January 4, 1990 TO: Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Jock Robertson, Executive Director of HRA SUBJECT: Preliminary Outline of HRA Budget for 1990 Staff has prepared the attached outline of a "maximum activity" budget for the 1990 fiscal year. This maximum activity budget adds likely new projects to those projects that are currently on hold which could be revived for HRA action It will be necessary for the HRA to assign priorities to these projects in order to get maximum utility from our limited financial resources. Staff suggests that each member prepare for the January 11, 1990, HRA meeting by designating a "HIGH", "MEDIUM", or "Low" ranking for each potential project. Then at the meeting, we should try to reach a rough consensus, realizing on the other hand that the market opportunities will have a major influence on timing. JR:ls M -90 -06 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: JOCK ROBERTSON dos 1 UNIVERSITY AVE. ($12) 571 -3450 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 EXT. 117 2 -A January 2, 1990 OUTLINE OF 1990 HRA BUDGET Page 1 Project Assistance Type Expense Revenue Source Lake Pointe 1. Buy out of old $5,600,000 Sale to new developer developer 2. Buy out of old $1,000,000 Escrow developer 3. Lake Pointe Drive $ 190,000 Revolving fund realignment R/W * 4. Other services & $ 60,000 Revolving fund charges including maintenance Center City * Southwest 1. Developer $2,215,350 Quadrant reimbursement (Boisclair) $1,952,100 Existing $1,600,000 (Clark) bond proceeds Balance by new bond sale 2. Revenue note to $ 136,364 developer (Boisclair) $ 110,491 Revenue note (Clark) (pay -as- you -go ?) 3. Contribution from $1,449,480 outside district (Boisclair) 4. Other services & $ 5,000 Revolving fund charges or developer fees Northeast 1. 5% developer reim- $188,000(UCD) Existing $1,600,000 Quadrant bursement at sub- bond proceeds stantial completion Balance by new bond sale (Note: Alternative would be an 8% $300,000 pay -as- you-go revenue note paid as taxes are received starting in 1991 or 1992.) 2. Other services & $ 4,000 Existing $1,600,000 charges bond proceeds or developer fees * most likely Moore Lake * Hillwind 1. Developer $ 109,500 $400,000 revolving �"))ffice Bldg. reimbursement at fund Certificate of Occupancy * most likely 2 -B January 2, 1990 OUTLINE OF 1990 HRA BUDGET Page 2 Project Assistance Type EXRense Revenue Source Center City (cont.) Plaza Ramp * 1. HRA 1/2 of maintenance $ 8,000 Existing $1,600,000 bond & $9,600 rent proceeds * 2. Electronic security $ 11,000 Existing $1,600,000 system bond & $9,600 rent proceeds 3. Anti - grafitti sealer $ 17,000 Existing $1,600,000 bond & $9,600 rent proceeds 4. 3 extra upper level $ 6,340 Existing $1,600,000 lights bond & $9,600 rent proceeds Plaza 1. Replacement trees $ 9,000 Existing $1,600,000 Landscaping bond & $9,600 rent proceeds 2. Replacement grates $ 2,500 Existing $1,600,000 bond & $9,600 rent proceeds 57th Place 1. Net acquisition of $315,000 New redevelopment site (Winfield) bond & $2,500 fee paid (Note: The Developer agrees to pay any additional costs above this figure, and HRA agrees to reimburse if less.) 2. Second Mortgage $100,000 $400,000 revolving fund 3. Other services & $ 2,200 Receivable $17,500 charges developer fee 4. Relocating streets & $150,000 10 year special utilities assessment Moore Lake * Hillwind 1. Developer $ 109,500 $400,000 revolving �"))ffice Bldg. reimbursement at fund Certificate of Occupancy * most likely z -c January 2, 1990 OUTLINE OF 1990 HRA BUDGET Page 3 �. roject Assistance Type Expense Revenue Source Moore Lake (cont.) * Moore Lake Commons 1. N.W. Racquet Club $ 120,000 Reserved fund reimbursement T.H. 65 - 1. Construction of $1,400,000 $11,500,000 bond Lake Pointe improvements issue to East Moore Lake Drive 2. Other services & $ 72,000 $11,500,000 bond charges issue Water Quality 1. 3- season decorative $ 100,000 $11,500,000 bond aerator issue Potential 1. Pay -as- you -go $ 100,000 Development TIF Commercial developer or Residential reimbursement Project on Old Central Avenue Old Central /Onan $20 million, 1. Land write -down for $ 200,000 New bond proceeds 500,000 sq. ft. 35 acre site (internal Onan warehouse/ review scheduled for office complex Dec. 11, 1989) (Note: Other options would probably not come on line in this year.) 2. Other services $ 3,000 New bond proceeds Junkyards redevelopment (Note: Funding dependent on Onan project.) Old Central Boulevards & bikeway /walkway Avenue (Note: Funding dependent on Onan project.) North Area /University * Vantage 1. Developer reimburse- $ 50,000 $400,000 revolving Phase II ment for soil correction fund 2. Other services $ 500 $400,000 revolving fund * most likely 2 -D January 2, 1990 •^ OUTLINE OF 1990 HRA BUDGET Page 4 Pro eat Assistance Type Expense Revenue Source North Area/ University (cont.) Osborne Road 1. 2nd mortgage (Rosewood $200,000 New bond issue Center Corp.) (Note: Approved by HRA in 1986 and then put on hold by developer. Project is apparently dead.) 2. Other services $ 1,500 New bond issue * Paschke I. Storm water maintenance $ 10,000 Escrow fund Area Wide University 1. Phase I improvements $700,000 $11,500,000 bond Ave. Corridor (no LRT) issue 2. Other services $ 5,000 $11,500,000 bond issue SBF /Osborne 1. Land write -down gra; Crossings (Note: More likely go revenue note for 1992 through 1994. on hold.) 2. Other services ,,it $200,000 New bond issue alternative is a pay- as -you- $250,000 to be paid from Developer has put project $ 2,000 New bond issue * Pro 1. Land write -down grant $ 50,000 $400,000 revolving Engineering fund or new bond issue * (Note: Alternative would be a pay -as- you -go revenue note for $70,000 to be paid from 1992 through 1994.) 2. Other services $ 2,000 $400,000 revolving fund or new bond issue a most likely 2 -E January 2, 1990 OUTLINE OF 1990 HRA BUDGET Page 5 toject Assistance Tvue Expense Revenue Source Area Wide (cont.) Northco 1. Soil correction grant $ 60,000 $400,000 revolving fund.or new bond issue * (Note: Alternative would be a pay -as- you -go revenue note for $90,000 to be paid from 1992 through 1995.) 2. Other services $ 2,000 $400,000 revolving fund or new bond issue Metal -Tek 1. Soil correction 2nd $100,000 $400,000 revolving mortgage fund or new bond issue (Note: Project is apparently dead. If revived, an alternative would be a pay -as- you -go revenue note for $80,000 to be paid from 1992 through 1995.) 2. Other services $ 1,000 $400,000 revolving fund or new bond issue * Administra- 1. Staff time tive Services - City Manager - Ex. Director - Finance - Public Works - Other staff 2. Misc. supplies 3. Contract servi most likely $149,807 $149,807 current 8% increment 250 33% 24% 10% $ 5,000 $5,000 current increment --es $ 3,000 $3,000 current increment OUSNG and REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 3 COMMISSION MEMBERS: LAWRENCE COMM=, CHARMAN MIANE PRAIIE V081NIA SCMASEL WALTER RASMUSSEN JOHN MEYER CITY OF FRIDLEY DATE: January 4, 1990 TO: Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Jock Robertson, Executive Director of HRA SUBJECT: Proposed Redevelopment of 10,000 Auto Parts Site by Urban Commercial Developers We have been meeting with Urban Commercial Developers, Inc., (UCD), concerning a proposal to develop a 28,000 sq. ft. shopping center on an expanded 10,000 Auto Parts site. At the present time, the obvious question is how the proposed development could be integrated with the projected light rail transit station which the Anoka County Railroad Authority contemplates on the same site. There will be a meeting some time in the month of January between Anoka County and UCD to discuss the timing of the two proposed developments. A preliminary agreement has already been reached as described in the attached December 11, 1989, memo to the City Manager. I would recommend that the HRA give concept approval to this development which would be funded on a pay -as- you -go grant from 5- 8% of the total project value. This would be essentially a rebate of taxes paid by the project during the first 2 -3 years of tax payment. The staff would then attempt to negotiate a draft development agreement with the developers and then bring it back to the HRA for its action. JR:ls M -90 -05 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: JOCK ROBERTSON 0431 UNIVERSITY AVE. (e 12) 571 -5450 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 EXT. 117 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT anroF MD1 -EY MEMORANDUM 3 -A DATE: December 11, 1989 TO: William Burns, City Manager FROM: ✓Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: Urban Commercial Developers Inc. Shopping Center Proposal; Northeast Corner of Mississippi Street and University Avenue On December 11, 1989, we met with Scott Erickson from Urban Commercial Developers, Inc. (UCD), BRW, and Tim Yantos from Anoka County, to discuss the relationship between the proposed park -and- ride light rail transit station and the proposed shopping center development at the northeast corner of Mississippi Street and University Avenue. The developer has submitted a site plan proposing construction of a 28,300 square foot shopping center. The following options were discussed regarding the impact of the light rail transit station on the proposed development: 1. On -site shared parking will be evaluated by the developer to determine how much parking can be provided on -site for park - and -ride traffic. This' number of parking spaces will be approached as a short -term measure to meet the immediate demand of park- and - riders for the light rail transit station. Once light rail transit ridership continues to increase, a long -term option could then be implemented. 2. The long -term approach would be to create a parking lot north of the proposed development, which may mean that Anoka County acquires six to eight homes between 66th and 67th Avenues. It was also discussed that the platform and canopy for the station would be moved slightly to the north, so as to not block visibility of the shopping center from University Avenue, and also to be closer to a future park- and -ride location north of the shopping center site. If the shared parking analysis in #1 proves that very few light rail transit park -and- riders can be accommodated, acquisition of the six to eight homes for a park- and -ride lot north of the center may become necessary when the light rail transit begins operation. 3 -B Urban Commercial Developers, Inc. December 11, 1989 Page 2 Moving the parking lot to the east of the development was ruled out because it would be too far to walk for park -and- riders. 3. Another option that was discussed was investigating construction of a multi -level ramp in conjunction with Target's expansion. The disadvantage to this approach, however, is that it may conflict with Target's plans, and may be cost - prohibitive given site constraints. We agreed that UCD would draw a preliminary plan of both the shopping center development and the proposed park- and -ride lot to the north of the shopping center. UCD wants to meet with Councilman Billings, the Ward Councilmember, possibly the Mayor, and yourself to review the options and proposal. UCD also wants to review the plan with Anoka County to see if there needs to be adjustments as far as the access into the site and the length of the median in Mississippi Street. Finally, it was also agreed that we would reconvene in mid- January with Anoka County and BRW, because at that time more decisions will have been made about the light rail transit timeframes. A rezoning of R -1 to C -1 will be requested by UCD (see attached map). Variances to the parking setbacks, parking ratio requirements, and building setbacks may also be requested. BD /dn cc: John Flora Mark Winson Scott Erickson Frank Reese M -89 -748 d w� W Q N L d NE 3 i I O 66th Avenue Y p� F 3 W z 0 3 -C I .ONE.WAY TRUCK TRAFFIC .1 LIAR _ ^�� .} «fit � •�•. � � ;- t Mississippi Street LAND: 2.86 Acres BUILDING: 28,230 Square feet PARKING: 180 required vs 203 provided 6' HIG= m iL;SIZIIIIIII �. , Y p� F 3 W z 0 3 -C I .ONE.WAY TRUCK TRAFFIC .1 LIAR _ ^�� .} «fit � •�•. � � ;- t Mississippi Street LAND: 2.86 Acres BUILDING: 28,230 Square feet PARKING: 180 required vs 203 provided 6' HIG= m iL;SIZIIIIIII 1 , 3 ,• ,I /t I - \ �, � �.± '1�'' • � , V d� ;� ten,•• � • ! 2 I (!) � I ' l \ � o.� 't .'s: , • -mss_, .'�.. ,�• 9 y \ ('� . 1. /N I t \ •. �it11 "„r, -r�r; .. l t� �_. ,� ,/ - 4•;.. �' «'. -� "•• is } I 2 •� �� /3 'o `� I rl + -'• IF IF DO '94 lz ID 6. 0. r P '� a ";�'t►') . ,�): t �;: of `' , � 7lS `•. _ 3 � � �� /Z Lt / � � '' ,� ','' d' ' ',,:+ - /S -�+ ,..✓ ice... ..., ' 3 W / �� �' I�••; :.I� d +• • 67 AVE. N. E. ro cnl AREA TO BE CONSIDERED 1 o I't g. � ' � b . • � � � ti ~ � � � L •FOR PARK AND RIDE-' � ° s > �. L''66 T "'AVE. N. E. lra+r Sngvy /lq Cen/er1 I Q •F. , PROPOSED REZONING TO C -1 CREEK CURRENTLY ZONED C -1 1 :9 23 24 MEMORANDUM TO: Jock Robertson, Exec. Director HRA PW89 -470 FROM: Jon Thompson, Construction Inspector DATE: December 26, 1989 SUBJECT: Lake Pointe Development Maintenance Project No. 197 Please have the HRA authorize Lake Pointe Development Maintenance Project No. 197 at their January 11, 1990, meeting. We would like to advertise the project during February, 1990, and have the bid letting on February 28, 1990. An authorization by the HRA is necessary in order for us to prepare the plans and specifications. JT /ts 4 • i��l► Fridley, Minnesota 1990 Prepared by: John G. Flora Public Works Director Department of Public Works CITY OF FRIDIEY 6431 University Ave., N.E. Fridley, M 55432 I hereby Certify that these plans and specifications were prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. JOHN G. FMRA, P. E. Reg. No. 14318 4 -A 4 -B r C= Y of PPIDLES Q ooicr A� scars Rz LAKE Pon= DBOElf IHENl' �az�ra+mtx� PACJDC•P #197 1990 FRIDLEY,0►1'A II�IDEX TO BPECg'ICZ=C= SE=XCN FADE W. Ii'IIrt AA. SDCTIC�T A - GENERAL C MMIMCM A -1.0 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 A -2.0 Insurance Coverage . . . . . . . . . . . .'. . . . . . 1 A -3.0 Engineer's Relation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 A -4.0 Materials, Services and Facilities . . . . . . 2 A -5.0 Qualifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . ". . . . . 2 A-6.0 Contract Security and Period of Guarantee. . . . . . . . . 3 A -7.0 Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 B -1.1 Grounds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 B-1.2 Month . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 B-1.3 Representative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 B-1.4 Spring Cleanup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 B -1.5 Mowing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 B-1.6 General Cleanup. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 B-1.7 Fertilizer & Weed Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 B-1.8 Aeration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 B-1.9 Irrigation System. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 B-1.10 Tree Pruning & Wrapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 B-1.11 Flower Beds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 8-1.12 Fall - Cleanup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o 5 B-1.13 Sod Replacement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . o 5 8-1.14 Mowers . . . . ` . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Project Maps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 -9 Notice to Bidders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Bidding Information and Re�Quirements 11 Contract . . . . o . . ' . .12 -13 Proposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 -15 i Lei 5(� 15 zkl OIL 1-1.0 General A -1.1 Bid proposals shall be submitted to the City of Fridley Engineering Department on or before MMMSDAY, FEMMM 28, 1990, by 11:00 a.m. for review by the Public Works Director. A -1.2 The duration of the contract shall be for a period of 7 months ca mencing on APRIL 15, 1990 and errling NMTMM 15, 1990. A -1.3 The award of contract will be made within 45 calendar days after the opening of proposals. A -1.4 No prequalification requirements are imposed prior to submitting a bid proposal; however, each bidder is advised that at the discretion of the Public Works Director a written statement may be required prior to consideration of the bids and prior to award of contract, showing the experience of the bidder and the amount of capital and equipment he has available for performance of the proposed work. A -1.5 If requested by the City, the Contractor and his subcontractors shall furnish lien waivers or certified statements from any party furnishing materials or rendering service in connection with this project, that said party has been paid in full. A -1.6 The right is reserved to reject any or all proposals, to waive defects and technicalities, or to advertise for new proposals, if in the judgement of the City its best interests will be promoted thereby- A-2.0 M su ance Coverage A -2.1 The Contractor shall protect the project with public liability insurance, the lower limits of which shall not be less than $100,000.00 for injuries, including accidental death to any one person and subject to the same limit for each person in an amount of not less than $300,000.00 on account of any one accident. A -2.2 Zhe Contractor shall also protect the project with Property Damage Insurance in the sum of not less than $100,000.00 for any one accident. Zhe Contractor shall take out and maintain compensation insurance as required by the State of Minnesota. Said policies shall have the City of Fridley as an additional insured. This insurance shall cover the project until it has been accepted by the City, and the amcxmt of the inm=w*A3e coverage shall be approved by the City. Zhe City will not reimburse the Contractor for the premiums. •A - -3.0 EAgineerls Relation A -3.1 The Engineer shall be interpreted to mean the Public Works Director, his Assistant, or designated representative- 1 4 -C 4 �. UM PoIIdPE NAUCM2 %= PlCaWr W. 197 4 -D A -3.2 The Engineer shall act as the City's representative during the contract period, and shall decide questions which may arise as to quality and acceptability of equipment furnished and work performed. The Engineer shall interpret the intent of the contract documents in a fair and unbiased manner and he will make visits to the site and determine if the work is proceeding in accordance with the contract documents. A -3.3 The Engineer shall promptly make all necessary explanations as to the meaning and intent of the specifications. A -3.4 The Engineer shall in all cases determine the amount, quality, acceptability and fitness of the several kinds of equipment and materials which are to be paid for under this contract. A -3.5 The decision of the Engineer shall be final and conclusive upon the City and the Contractor. A -4.0 Materials, Services and Facilities A -4.1 It is understood that, except as otherwise specifically stated in the contract documents, the Contractor shall provide and pay for all materials, labor, tools, equipment, water, light, power, barricades, transportation, supervision, temporary construction of any nature, and all other services and facilities of any nature necessary to execute, complete, and deliver the work. A -5.0 Qualifications A -5.1 The apparent low- bidder, prior to the award of the contract, if requested by the City, will be required to show evidence of prior work during the past 36 months. A -6.0 Contract Security and Period of Guaranty A -6.1 The successful low bidder shall be required to furnish the owner with a performance bond in the form required by law, in the amount of 100% of the total contract. A -6.2 This bond shall guarantee the proper prosecution and completion of the work by the successful bidder; and shall further guarantee the prat payment by the successful bidder of all persons or firms furnishing labor, equipment, material$ and supplies for the work. A -6.3 If it is found by the final inspection that some of the work and/or materials were defective, such work and/or materials shall be replaced or repaired within 30 days of notification by the City. If the work is not repaired within 30 days of notification, the work will be done by other forces and charged to the performance ,—o bond. N r-1\ rXM PonfrE MY DPMENT MII1I'IIG,T M PAODTOCT W. 197 4 -E A -7.0 Payments A -7.1 Monthly payments (1/7th of the lump sum contract amount) shall be made to the contractor for satisfactory performance of work completed during the contract period. 3 .'IA...I� zAIM POnITE nEVE:DPKW MAnUENR= PRWECT M. 197 4 -F yap.« , �:•�� � ��. 8-1.1 Grooms The term grounds shall mean all portions of the 44 acre lake Pointe Development Site (see page 7). Prospective bidders should ask for an on -site inspection of the grounds prior to submission of their bid. 8-1.2 Month A month for the purpose of this agreement shall be a calendar month. B-1.3 Representative The term " representative" shall mean the individual appointed by the Brngineer to ccsrnnucate with the contractor for the coordination of the maintenance of the grounds, and shall be authorized to act on behalf of the Contrackee. B-1.4 Siring Cleanup Spring cleanup is to be ccupleted as soon as weather and ground conditions permit and no later than May 15. For the purpose of this contract, spring cleanup will include picking up paper and debris over the entire site, raking where needed, and unwrapping the deciduous trees. B -1.5 Mowing- No more than one -third (1/3) of leaf surface is to be cut at one time. The City requires grass to be mowed twice each week to maintain the range of length specified. (a) Area north of the north road: Mow as needed to maintain grass between 2 1/2" to 3 1/211. (Wood chip and rock beds to be kept free of clipper) (b) The central area: The areas up to 20 feet back of the curb and gutter, mow as needed to maintain grass between 2 1/2" to 3 1/2" as needed. The rest of the south area, mow as needed to maintain grass between 3" and 4". (c) Area south of the loon road: The area up to 20 feet back of the curb and gutter, mow as needed to maintain grass between 2 1/2" to 3 1 /2" as needed. The rest of the Central area, mow as needed to maintain grass between 3" and 411. (d) The 6 ponds: Maw as needed to maintain grass between 2 1/2" to 3 1/2" B-1.6 General Upkeep Debris to be picked up in pond areas and on overall site on a weekly basis. 4 a Lm Pon= 1 DPHM 1QJ2aMNP+iiOCE Plm►7F3GT M. 197 4 -G 8-1.7 Fertilizes and Weed Control Fertilizer is to be applied in the spring, summer and fall as directed by the City. Fertilizer is to be applied at a minimum of one pound of slow release nitrogen per thousand square feet. Suggested formulation of fertilizer is 20- 10-10. Formulation may be altered pending results of soil testing. An application of herbicide for broadleaf control shall be applied in the spring. Suggested herbicide is Trimec applied as per label. written approval from the City is required of the selected fertilizer and herbicide before application. B-1.8 Aeration There will be no aeration on this project. B-1.9 Irrigation System Sprinkler heads and risers damaged during routine mowing are to be replaced immediately by the Contractor. B-1.10 Tree Pnming and Wrapping Tree pruning and soft wood tree wrapping with approved tree wrapping shall be performed in the fall as directed by the City. B-1.11 Flower Beds Flower beds shall be weeded weekly as needed. Remove dead buds as needed with shears. Junipers shall be sprayed in the fall with "Wilt Proof ", or equal, to prevent water loss over winter. B-1.12 Fall Cleanup Pick up debris and rake the entire site as needed. Bag and remove leaves frcen site. Contractor is responsible for disposal of leaves and bagged debris. B-1.13 Sod Replacement If damage occurs to sodded areas, during routine maintenance, sod will be immediately replaced in the areas affected by the maintenance contractor. No additional payment will be made for replacement of sod damaged during mowing operations. 8-1.14 Mowers The mowing shall be accomplished by reel or rotary mowers, flail mowers ,.� are not acceptable. 5 ip 111�� 0 Sy ov &IRAOIN Nv7yj 21r1s, 0 U CL j, I 11 Ir If _Y*N y/ CL 1 N in I'm tj 6 - 4-H 0 w :� 2 �� m C' C'n Z O 0 M) • ►1 �i�.►�r11�i1i'Ii•�I.r•� \I_ �. ► �,•'• • lr 4 `•1141, .: , "•• •' :� :III I4II .1 Oz., •� r��!' � 1 i� 111,1• . • fat. Oil •� •f �r 1 • •� ••- •11 iw� DR ► NJ .• • �� t.1 1 1� w 1. 1. � 1 \ 1 r' �11y � 11 '1. 20 1 1 WW � Y OJ t�'Y3�r-- �u,K�.71 s9 Gw .m.►uona �av'�11 31r1S dk ate: I:ti":h"r • � r r r \ N > cr CL �+ 1 u . 1 1 -� Y• \ \ 1 ' �• 1 '�'�� � - a coo I •oo { � � \ 04 tn w Na N 1. \ o IL If 1 Il' 4 1 . r- 1 Q W I W I r i w r, � \T •f� U O W - 9 4 -K W N z Z_ J . cr Y3 C© zo►-= :)=NVo MN W J ~WaV0 L4CE 0v jj Wz�Z 3 N t_ Nz ZN0 facrWz 0OZWIr NQiN'1 W F 0 z it mn Ponm MELOMM ra=WW= PRO► = NO. 197 4 -L Sealed bids will be received and publicly cpened for the HRA by the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, at the office of the Public Works Director, 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 55432 (Tel. 571 -3450) on the 28th day of FEBRMM, 1990, at 11:00 a.m., for the furnishing of work and materials for IAjKE POINTE DEVELOPMENT MAugjEwo E PROTECT #197. 44 Acres Mowing, trimming and other maintenance as specified. All in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by John G. Flora, P.E., Public Works Director, Fridley City Hall, 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 (Tel. 571 - 3450). Plans and specifications may be examined at the office of the Public Works Director and copies may be obtained for the Contractor's individual use by applying to the Public Works Director. Bids must be made on the basis of cash payment for work, and accompanied by a cash deposit, certified check (on a responsible bank in the State of Minnesota) or a bidder's bond made payable without condition to the City of Fridley, MN, in an amount of not less than five (5 %) per cent of the total amount of the bid. The BRA reserves the riot to reject any and all bids and to waive any informalities in any bids received without explanation. No bid may be withdrawn for a period of forty -five (45) days. By order of the BRA of the City of Fridley, Minnesota. Dated the 11th day of January, 1990. John G. Flora, P.E. PUBISC VEM DIRECIDR Published: Fridley Focus Constniction Bulletin February 7, 1990 February 9, 1990 February 14, 1990 February 16, 1990 February 21, 1990 February 23, 1990 10 e �.1 r L,AIKE POIRM PRO= W. 197 4 -M Sealed bids shall be submitted to the Engineering Department of the City of Fridley on or before 11:00 a.m. MEMGMM, FEMMUM 28, 1990, for the furnIshing of all material, equipment, labor and other resources required to omplete the Lake Pointe Development Maintenanoe Project #197. All bids shall be submitted on the proposal form provided in the specifications. No bids may be withdrawn for a period of forty -five (45) days. Any questions regarding bidding or scope of work shall be directed to Jon 7hompson at 572 -3556. 11 f IAA POnUE DEV ZPKW MWMTMMN= PROJECT W. 197 4 -N CONTRACT VY This Agreement made and entered into this day of 1990, by and between CITY OF FRIDIEY BRA hereinafter referred to as the CITY (Party of the First Part) and hereinafter referred to as the CONrRACIOR (Party of the Second Part). That the CONIRRACIOR, in consideration of the convenant and the agreement of the CITY hereinafter set forth, and for the scan and price of hereby agrees that, VO EREAS, the CITY has heretofore asked for proposals for the furnishing of materials, labor, and equipment and the use of the CONIRACIOR'S equipment and plant, for the purpose of: ImE POINI'E DEVEmPMENT M ivrENANCE PROJECT NO. 197 and appurtenances thereto, as shown on the plans and as set forth in the Specifications now on file with the City, and that, WHEREAS, the CONIRACIOR has submitted a Proposal in response thereto, which has been accepted by the CITY, in which the CONIRACIOR agrees to and shall furnish all necessary materials, labor, use of tools, equipment, and plant and everything necessary to perform the work designated and set forth in the Contract, including all CONTRACIOR'S superintendence, and to furnish everything necessary for the completion of the Project and to put the entire system into complete working condition. Fi31MM: The CONTRACIOR agrees, under penalty of a Corporate Surety Bond in the amount of 1000 of the total Contract, to complete the work under the contract in accordance with the Contract Documents. The Contract Documents consist of the following ccgmner►t parts, all of which are as full a part of this Contract as though therein stated verbatim, or if not attached, as if hereto attached: 1. The Minnesota Department of Highways "Standard Specifications for Highway Construction" dated June 9, 1988. 2. The City of Fridley Specifications included with this Contract. 3. The "Proposal ", "Bid Schedule" and "Bond" of the Contractor. A. This "Contract" between the City and the Contractor. 5. Any Modifications or changes in the terms of the Contract or Bid or additions to or deductions frcen the amount or character of the work which is to be performed or which may be agreed to in writing by the Contractor and the City. 12 I Lm Ponm DEVMPMMU NAnfrauam PIiO►= w. 197 4 -0 -a - The OORMCIOR agrees to pay all persons furnishing labor and material in and about the performan a of the OONTRACr; and the CONTRACTOR will, within ten (10) working days after the acceptance of the CONTRACTOR'S Bid execute this Contract and furnish a bond to be approved by the City in a sum equal to 100% of the full amount of the Bid. The CONTRACTOR further agrees to take all precautions to protect the public against injury and to save the CITY harmless from all damages and claims of the OONTRACIOR or the OONTRACTOR'S Agents or Employees while engaged in the performance of this Contract and will indemnify the CITY furnished as aforesaid and against all loss by reason of the failure of the CONTRACOR in any respect to fully perform all obligations of this CON TRACT. The CITY agrees to pay the CONTRACTOR for the performance of this Contract, and the ODNLRACTOR agrees to accept as full compensation thereof the prices set forth within the attached Proposal. The CONTRACTOR and the CITY agree that all of the terms of this Contract shall be binding upon themselves, their heirs, administrators, executors, legal and personal representatives, successors, and assigns. IN WITNESS W[MMF, the Parties hereto have set their hands and seals this day of , 1990. JOHN G. FLDRA, Public Works Director CITY OF FRIDLEY BRA 0 JOCK L. ROBERTSON, Executive Director - BRA LARRY R. COiOEFS, Chairman - BRA PARTY OF THE SECOND PART �M WITNESS NAME (TITLE) Fw IM PoanM IM 1EX PjK)M= NO. 197 4-P . PROPasAL �. LM POIM M%MD 4= jGU7?BD=C E PRi I M I #197 Proposal of: Name ; Street Address City, State Zip Code To furnish and deliver all materials and to do and perform all work, in accordance with the contract and specifications on file in the office of the Public Works Director and the "Special PYovisians" cwAzi ned herein for: ' LM P03M DEVEIDPN iCE PRO► = #197 SID = All maintenance items N wing, fertilizing, general cleanup; etc., as spelled out in the specifications) TOTRL BID . $ (figs) S TOTAL BID '= IN WMMS Signed (title) 14 I+ ;ll"�11 • Y' • • � Y • • 7i • ICI I• � 31 r• •a •.• ? • Zhe undersigned agrees that, if the City decides to diminish or extend the work, or otherwise alter it by extras or deductions, including the elimination of any one or more of the items, by an amount not to exceed twenty -five percent (25 %) of the Lump Sum Bid Price, he will perform the work as altered, increased or decreased subject to unit bid prices as bid. Enclosed herewith find bidder's bond or certified check in the amount of being at least 5% of the amount of the proposal, made payable to the City of Fridley as a proposal guarantee which it is agreed by the undersigned will be forfeited in the event of the Form of Contract and Bond is not executed, it is being awarded to the undersigned. Zhe undersigned agrees to enter into contract in the form hereto attached and to furnish a corporate surety bond as required by the specifications, both within ten (10) working days from his receipt of the Notice of Award from the City. Should this proposal be accepted, the day after the postmark date shall constitute the day of receipt of such notice. In the event of the failure of the undersigned to enter into such a contract within said ten (10) days, then the amount of bid security attached hereto is to be forfeited as agreed liquidated damages to the City of Fridley. The undersigned agrees to begin work on or after APRIL 15, 1990, and prosecute said work as to complete the same on or before NWMMM 15, 1990. The undersigned agrees that this proposal shall remain in effect and not to be withdrawn for forty -five (45) calendar days after this date. DATED TiIt.S DAY OF , 1990. COI TMOTIM F33M NAME SIGN TURE TI= ADDRESS CITY TELEPHMM NUKBER NODE: If the Contractor is a corporation, attach hereto a corporate acknowledgement. 15 4 -Q t RERO?MTrCH NO. MM - 1990 IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the Fridley State Bank is hereby designated as a depository for the funds of this corporation. IT IS FURMHER RESOLVED that checks, drafts or other withdrawal orders issued against the funds of this corporation on deposit with said bank shall be signed by two of the following: Richard D. Pribyl, Finanoe Directo William W. Burns, City Manager Julie M. Burt, Assistant Finance Director and that said bank is hereby fully authorized to pay and charge to the account of this corporation any checks, drafts, or other withdrawal orders. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all transactions, if any, relating to deposits, withdrawals, re- discounts and borrowings by or on behalf of this corporation with said bank prior to the adoption of this resolution be, and the same hereby are, in all things ratified, approved and confirmed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any bank or savings and loan may be used as depositories for investment purposes so long as the investments conmiply with authorized investments as set forth in Minnesota statutes. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the signatures of two of the following named City employees are required for withdrawal of BRA investment funds from savings and loan associations: Richard D. Pribyl, Finance Director-Treasurer William W. Burns, City Manager Julie M. Burt, Assistant Finance Director BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any brokerage firm may be used as a depository for investment purposes so long as the investments comply with the authorized investments as set forth in Minnesota Statutes. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY = BUSING AND RIDEVELOPMERr A HORITY OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990. 5 CLAIMS (at meeting) 0 I y f f� $ Y, Otto MY be �1 Y � 1: 4 Sim Yom. TAT M 8 k i ::r { 504, AMC ff { r ,Y ' i N w* . ' s Off if 4 S � Lilly too { A � da' oil t 6.ti 4T r � III, ,. is i y.. 'at 1 PAZ it i W Oil j ;F - Ss if x� "Won MAN M1 ` 4010 man WON'T r w � r T - iV PUTS A WON: ..i not a j � � ", •J. X0.1 +` M . ,... f I y f f� $ Otto MY be �1 PAT 1 Yom. TAT e { i N w* . ' s ` t t'. h, Lilly VON V oil t 6.ti is MEMORANDUM City •t �ri0�•, 442 •ffice Ot the City Manager .., u•�••r.� :, •..... U.K. •.�. William W. sums , Fridley. rl•••.•t• 415482 l TO: Housing and Redevelo ment Authority /�► ` FROM: William W. Burns �. DATE: January 4, 1990 SUBJECT: TIF Guidelines for Senior Housing Council discussed the uses of TIF for senior housing projects at a conference session on December 11, 1989. An informal consensus reached at this meeting establishes the following guidelines: 1. TIF may be used to provide a loan of up to fifteen percent (15 %) of the project cost for any purposes allowed under State law. The loan is to be secured by a second mortgage. 2. TIF may be used to provide a grant of up to five percent (5%) of project cost. The grant is to be used for soil correction or land assemblage. 3. TIF may be used to provide a combination grant and loan that does not exceed the value of a fifteen percent (15 %) loan. The grant and loan components are to be used for the purposes identified in Items 1 and 2. 4. In deciding whether to award a grant or loan, several conditions should be observed: a. There should be a demonstrated local market for the project. b. The loan or grant should be funded from the tax increment generated by the project. C. Generally speaking, redevelopment projects and projects proposed for vacant land are eligible for TIF funding. Where both kinds of projects are being proposed, preference should be given to redevelop- ment projects. 7 n Memorandum to HRA January 4, 1990 Page Two Council also indicated a desire to reexamine the TIF standard for senior housing at such time as they consider comprehensive TIF guidelines. Finally, Council supports the use of housing revenue bonds as a form of assistance for senior housing projects. They recognize that this tool may be used by itself or in combination with tax increment financing. WWB:rsc 7 -A IOUSM and REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 8 COMMISSION MEMBERS: LAMIIENCE COMMERS. CMARMAN NIANE PRATE MIONIA SCHNABEL W ALTU RASMUSSEN JOHN MEM CITY OF FRIDLEY DATE: January 4, 1990 TO: Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM Jock Robertson, Executive Director of HRA SUBJECT: Status of 57th Place Soil Investigations The report from Delta Environmental on the extent of ground water and soil pollution on the site has been submitted to the Pollution Control Agency (PCA) and is currently under review. Best estimates for the final recommendations and agreement with Ashland Oil are mid-February. Rob Goltz of the PCA indicated he believes the recommended mitigating measure will be the pumping of ground water for approxi- mately two years. We do not yet know what the cost of this mitigation will be. In the meantime, Jack Lemley of Ashland Oil has indicated that Ashland will sign a letter of agreement with the PCA agreeing to clean up the site. It would appear that when the agreement is reached between the PCA and Ashland Oil on the clean -up and a better idea is gotten of the actual expense and the intended legal exposure, the HRA can bring this item off the table. In the meantime, staff will now contact Winfield Development to ascertain how committed they are to proceed with their original proposal in the light of its being tabled for almost a year. I hope to have an update ready for the meeting. JR:ls M -90 -04 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: JOCK ROBERTSON 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. (612) $71 -3450 FRIDLEY, SIN $5432 EXT. 117 AI ." L 8 -A VALVOLINE INSTANT OIL CHANGE, INC. P.O. Box 14046 Lexington. Kentucky 40512 U� A Da rnbcr 19, 1999 Telephone (606) 268 -7100 i'ir. Jock R )bertson Community Development Director/Executive Director of the HRA RE: Environmental. Study Rapid Oil Site 57th & University Avenue Fridley, Minnesota Dear Jock: This letter will confirm our conversation of last week whereas Ashland will clean up the Rapid Oil site at the northeast corner of 57th & University Avenue as recommended in the Delta Environmental Consultants Report dated December 1, 1989 or as recommended by the PCA. It is hopeful that the HRA will be able to make a decision at their January 11th meeting as to whether they still want to condemn this property or not. If anymore information is needed, please contact the undersigned. ASHLAND OIL, INC. P. O. Box 14000 L "ton, KY 40512 C !rate Real Estate 2460 Sincerely, J. K. Lemley Condemnation Supervisor Mr. Jock Robertson City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue RE Fridley, M 55432 .► �• _�i u �.i�il�lr JAM -2'90 s gt 61131T1 � v r" 99 ( Pic G) PC O i6o PC � FF1 y O , Z O O � H O Ise Lqr ;,.As � a A [pill Ilk 11 hiss owl8 -1 -all I Ilk W .- .. . — 0 r M'16 so v — . -- �-- . a&- .rte ► - I r IF a Casserly Molzahn & Associates, Inc. 215 South 11th Street. Suite 200 • Minneapolis • Minnesota 55403 Office (612) 342 -2277 • Fax (612) 332 -4765 M E M O R A N D U M TO: City of Fridley Jock Robertson, HRA Director William Burns, City Manager David Newman, HRA Attorney FROM: James R. Casserly Mary E. Molzahn RE: Cinemark Project DATE: . August 8,-1989 INTRODUCTION 11�, We have been asked to determine what subsidies might be available to assist Jerry Farrell with the development of a retail and theater project referred to as the Cinemark Project. In this project there is an additional problem of establishing an appropriate district in order to generate tax increments to provide assistance. This memo will briefly describe each of the problems and suggest possible solutions. TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT It is our understanding that the site for the Cinemark Project is not in the City's development program nor in a tax increment district. Normally this type of commercial project would n necessitate the creation of an economic development tax increment 0 Page 2 City of Fridley August 8, 1989 district. However, Section 469.176, subd. 4c of Minnesota Statutes, states that: "revenue derived from tax increment from an economic development district may not be used to provide loans, subsidies . . . or assistance in any form to developments consisting of buildings and ancillary facilities, if 25% of the buildings and facilities (determined on the basis of square footage) are used for the purposes listed in Section 144(a)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 ." That section of the Internal Revenue Code lists among objection- able uses "the provision of recreation or entertainment." Since the theater is to comprise more than half of the square footage of the project, this provision clearly prohibits the use of an economic development tax increment district. The only other suitable type of district would be a redevelopment district as described in Section 469.174, subd. 10. It is our understanding that the project comprises a single parcel with one building. In order to qualify as a redevelopment district the building would have to be found to be "structurally substandard" which the statute in subd. 10(5)(b) defines as: "containing defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance." �� Page 3 City of Fridley August 8, 1989 Due to the problems with the site, and because of the extended period of time during which the building has been vacant and from the observations of City personnel, we believe this building could be found to be "structurally substandard" and as a result a redevelopment tax increment district could be created. The Fridley development program could be amended to incorporate this site, as was done with the Onan Project, and then a tax increment district for this single parcel could be established and a financing program adopted. Once the appropriate approvals were obtained, the district could be established in 45 to 60 days. /..1 SUBSIDY OPTIONS Three of the four options described below the HRA has previously utilized; the fourth option, using a reserve or a debt service guarantee, the HRA has adopted the framework but has never utilized it. The options are as follows: 1. Grant. The grant has been used a number of times and has generally been limited to 5% of the market value of the property. The grant, like all other forms of tax increment assistance, can only be spent on statutorily eligible activities. If we follow past practices, the grant for this project would be approximately $135,000. '� Page 4 City of Fridley August 8, 1989 2. Loan. This method of assistance was just used in the Kittleman or Advance Project. Customarily the loan has been limited to 15% of the market value of the project so that in this project the loan would amount to approximately $405,000. The interest rate, deferred payments, term and interest abatement are all subject to negotiation. 3. Revenue Note. The most notable and infamous use of a revenue note has been the Lake Pointe Project. However, that project demonstrates the virtue of using such an approach. The HRA does not provide any money at the inception of the project but only pays with increments that are generated from the development activities. When the entire assistance, unlike Lake Pointe, is generated by way of a revenue note, there is no risk to the City. The revenue note allows for substantial flexibility in structuring the assistance. If we assume that the project needs approximately $400,000 of assistance, then the HRA can pledge to the developer the tax increments that are generated by the project. The three schedules that are attached are simply the present value, computed at a rate of 10 %, of the available tax increment based on differing . ,. Page 6 City of Fridley August 8, 1989 Beginning Balance of the note on Page 2 and the Available Tax Increment column on Page 1 corresponds to the Total Payment column on Page 2). A revenue note approach offers myriad variations. The developer need only receive a percentage of the total tax increment generated; the amounts can be weighted so that more value is received in the earl_vvears or there can be a combination using grants and /or loans as part I of the assistance. In other cities with projects that are generally considered more economic development, we limit the tax increment assistance to soil corrections, 1^ improvements and related infrastructure assistance. The developer pays for those improvements and when the City issues the Certificate of Occupancy it delivers to the developer a revenue note. The tax increment revenue note is becoming better understood by lending institutions, and developers are finding it easier to pledge the notes and receive loans from those institutions collateralized by the note. A revenue note also allows the City to avoid analyzing the credit worthiness of a project. I Page 7 City of Fridley August 8,-1989 In a growing number of cities with actual redevelopment projects a combination of grants and revenue notes are used to make the projects feasible. 4. Guarantees. Minnesota Statutes 469.176, subd. 4 states that tax increment revenues shall be used for the following purposes: ". by a municipality or redevelopment agency to finance or otherwise pay premiums for insurance or other security guaranteeing the payment when due of principal of and interest on the bonds pursuant to chapter 462C, sections 469.152 to 469.165, or both, or to accumulate and maintain a reserve securing the payment when due of the principal of and interest on the bonds pursuant to chapter 462C, sections 469.152 to 469.165, or both, which revenues in the reserve shall not exceed, subsequent to the fifth anniversary of the date of issue of the first bond issue secured by the reserve, an amount equal to 20 percent of the aggregate principal amount of the outstanding and nondefeased bonds secured by the reserve." About six years ago the-City adopted a resolution allowing for the establishment of a reserve to help secure the issuance of debt authorized by the industrial development revenue bond statutes, now Sections 469.152 to 469.165. Only a couple of -cities have established reserve systems to securitize their debt (the St. Paul Port Authority being the most notable). Because of the complexity of the system and the number of users needed to make if cost effective, it would probably not be prudent for 11' ,n 11­1 M Page 8 City of Fridley August 8, 1989 Fridley to establish such a program at this time. As the statutes suggest debt can also be securitized by the Authority paying for a letter of credit, insurance or other guarantees. The only legal obstacle is that the debt must be issued pursuant to Sections 469.124 to 469.134 (industrial development revenue bonds). The industrial development revenue bonds (IDB's) were normally issued to get the advantage of a tax exempt 4rate. The use of these bonds has been severely limited so that only a small number of uses actually qualify for tax exempt treatment. In the Cinemark Project, for example, a commercial use is expressly prohibited. To utilize this section, a developer would issue a taxable bond through the Authority and then the Authority would use tax increments to pay for security enhancement. Using tax increments to pay for security enhancements is not necessarily less expensive than using tax increments to pay for other authorized expenses. The HRA is not putting its revenues behind the project but is only paying for certain defined costs associated with the project, that is, the cost of a letter of credit, insurance premium or other security enhancement. It seems to us that the use of this provision is cumbersome and expensive. In almost all cases, the same result could be achieved by determining the cost of the credit 4 Page 9 City of Fridley August 8, 1989 enhancement and paying for it by means of a land write down or soil correction or infrastructure improvement. The use of a revenue note can help generate funds on an annual basis if this is the desired goal. Different projects and different sets of circumstances will result in different conclusions. However, for the Cinemark Project given our present state of understanding, we believe that the use of the guarantee would not be cost effective. CONCLUSION With our present understanding of the Cinemark Project, we recommend the use of a limited revenue note combined, if necessary, with a small grant or loan if feasible. To utilize the tax increment, we recommend the amendment of your development a program to include the Cinemark parcel, the establishment of a redevelopment tax increment district and the adoption of a finance plan. JRC /db f� 1 l Draft 3/12/86 AGREEMENT By and Between THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA And VANTAGE PROPERTIES, INC. THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Herrick 6 Newman P.A. It 6279 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Section 4.3. Commencement and Completion of Construction. Subject to Unavoidable Delays, the Company shall commence construction of the Minimum Improvements to Parcel I within 120 days of execution of be constructed on this Agreement and on Parcel II within 60 months of e)iecu- tion of this Agreement or on such other date as the Parties shall mutually agree in writing. Subject to Unavoidable Delays, the Company shall have substantially completed the construction of the Minimum Improvements on Parcel I within 9 months of the date of this Agreement and on Parcel II' within 72"months of the date of this Agreement. Section 4.4. Uses. It is agreed that on the Southeast Parcel there shall not be located or constructed any busi- ness or building that engages in automotive or motor vehicle repairs or service, or that sells gasoline, fuels or motor — vehicle parts. `-1 Section 4.5. Setback. It is agreed that the "setbacks" (as used in the Fridley Zoning Code) for Parcels I and II along the service rplanandAllsother Avenue setbacks shall bedasated in the Development provided in the Fridley Zoning Code. Section 4.6. Billboard. It is agreed that the bill- board currently leased to Naegele and located adjacent to University Avenue on the Development Property shalt be removed at no expense to the City on or before December 31, 1986. 4 - 2 C1 1, : ail L IrSi •. SIMICI W\ - = `FF f 7 a iii'p11�illif R �I � III giI US o Q ii :I is � i•d it � I o 7 lino i I Q . n � o 4 t� t•':.�1 t 1 � •1 � 1 ' : 1 1 I � Iill' i�• f rh i I I W\ - = `FF f 7 a iii'p11�illif R �I � III as- rn o `�•!' C t r a. o0 All to • i °c 1 � - :�s o d� J: i g,-- ' Sty' • O r T-C • N . • D � r f M 0� qyl ���� a •op giI US o Q ii :I is � i•d it � I o 7 lino i I Q . n � o as- rn o `�•!' C t r a. o0 All to • i °c 1 � - :�s o d� J: i g,-- ' Sty' • O r T-C • N . • D � r f M 0� qyl ���� a •op 1 d f r t j r rl a :fit i�( I a (i , E , •, , ,d Q - - tr �� m � _° _ � � . l � �! •;' .a,i,_ =,- (; ,; It s:! _ qi �r` t ii r� ,� r so t to cn p ►• w � I i � i � � ,� i i - i +' � �g It � tI_'i.�'• ^i � � 1tt jI ��� i( rl �i �i e � ��:� � ' a e a f'E d¢'1�'� #: r lr r �� ;1rf i� t .E► t FF4 M c D o n ald's. � • 6 E � 3 � } MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT � .-.-• —" �: t 7�� R t $ FIST STREET a tANIV FRIDL Y MN ERSITY AVE •• ! r � 1 1 i • •r•1G I.pi F ^ i SITE PLAN � � _ giI US o Q ii :I is � i•d it � I i n � o 4 t� t•':.�1 t 1 1- 1 1 d f r t j r rl a :fit i�( I a (i , E , •, , ,d Q - - tr �� m � _° _ � � . l � �! •;' .a,i,_ =,- (; ,; It s:! _ qi �r` t ii r� ,� r so t to cn p ►• w � I i � i � � ,� i i - i +' � �g It � tI_'i.�'• ^i � � 1tt jI ��� i( rl �i �i e � ��:� � ' a e a f'E d¢'1�'� #: r lr r �� ;1rf i� t .E► t FF4 M c D o n ald's. � • 6 E � 3 � } MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT � .-.-• —" �: t 7�� R t $ FIST STREET a tANIV FRIDL Y MN ERSITY AVE •• ! r � 1 1 i • •r•1G I.pi F ^ i SITE PLAN � � _ o Q ii :I is � i•d it � n � o 4 t� t•':.�1 t 1 d f r t j r rl a :fit i�( I a (i , E , •, , ,d Q - - tr �� m � _° _ � � . l � �! •;' .a,i,_ =,- (; ,; It s:! _ qi �r` t ii r� ,� r so t to cn p ►• w � I i � i � � ,� i i - i +' � �g It � tI_'i.�'• ^i � � 1tt jI ��� i( rl �i �i e � ��:� � ' a e a f'E d¢'1�'� #: r lr r �� ;1rf i� t .E► t FF4 M c D o n ald's. � • 6 E � 3 � } MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT � .-.-• —" �: t 7�� R t $ FIST STREET a tANIV FRIDL Y MN ERSITY AVE •• ! r � 1 1 i • •r•1G I.pi F ^ i SITE PLAN � � _ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT UN Of fRJMEY MEMORANDUM DATE: September 13, 1989 TO: Housing i Redevelopment Authority Members Planning Commission Members FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director /Executive Director of the HRA SUBJECT: Status of the Contamination Testing at 57th Place N.E. On Monday, September 11, 1989 I received an update from Mary Siedlecki of Delta Environmental, concerning progress on the bores and testing at the site. Ms. Siedlecki reported that the additional bore on the site in the tank basin area hit contaminated soil. But, they found no ground water contamination, which she characterized as unusual and unexpected. In the monitoring well on the 57th Street right -of -way north of SuperAmerica, they found no contaminated soil. Similarly, at the monitoring well on the University Avenue right -of -way east of Hardees Restaurant, no contaminated soil was found. The groundwater testing will be done in mid- September when the groundwater system stabilizes after being disturbed by the bore holes being drilled. The schedule for completion anticipates the water quality results being returned by mid - October. An additional three weeks will then be required to complete the written report which will be forwarded to Art Nuby at Rapid Oil approximately the second week in November. Based on past experience, Ms. Siedlecki estimates that it will take Kr. Nuby one and a half to two weeks to review the written report and pass it on to the Pollution Control Agency. This would then bring us into the end of November. JLR/dn K -69 -555 61233289; SENT BY: KRAUS-ANDERS n September 14. 1989 9 -14 -89 ; 2 :52PM ; 6123328739-* 512 571 1287 ;# 2 KRAUS- ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Mr. John Flora City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Re: Fridley Civic Center Fridley, Minnesota X/A Project #3789 Seefert-Heins Landscape Contract Dear Mr. Flora: CONTRACTORS & CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS In accordance with the above subject matter, we request that you approve a change order DEDUCT in the amount of SIX THOUSAND SEVENTY -ONE AND N01100 DOLLARS ($6,071.00). I understand that the City of Fridley would like to delete alternate #1 to the Seefert-Heins contract as well as make some other changes; I have provided breakdown pricing below: Delete Alternate #1 Landscaping DEDUCT <$6,071.00> Add 210 bulbs and 54 mum plants in AM 900.00 front entrance planters Delete 37 Choke Cherry Shrubs and Delete 2 Agoda Dogwoods DEDUCT <$900-00> TOTAL <$6,071.00)> (:This quotation is valid �=mi S eptember 20,1989. — Ta.IOLUP To # Enclosed is our backup data to justify the amount of this request. A 04 L-ffjn Z Very truly yours, KRAUS -AND CONS CTION COMPANY a&W Thomas J. Sack tt Project Manager TJS:ng Enclosure oa Jon Rall Rick Pribyl Jock Robertson Brian Turnquist LWAIWer-f— w�L ewpot- �J MINNEAPOLIS DIVISION 4 _11)� 525 SOUTH EIC = - -'TREET, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55404 PHONE: 812.332 -7281 /1 ' 6' ° �- Engineering N Sewer � Y Water Q r O Parks O 3 Streets �' U Maintenance U. MEMORANDUM TO: William W. Burns, City Manager PW89 -352 FROM: John G. F1ora,tPublic Works Director DATE: September 15, 1989 SUBJECT: Municipal Center Change Orders This memorandum is in response to Councilwoman Jorgenson's request for information regarding the Municipal Center costs and the explanation of the change orders. The attached sheet provides the summary of the change order costs associated with the Municipal Center, Fire Station and Ramp. Change Order No. 1 dealt with the roof and column modifications necessary as a result of opening up the old building and observing construction different from the original plan. Change Order No. 2 dealt with the HRA's desire to provide for additional conduiting for future lighting and surveillance systems within the ramp. Change Order No. 3 included some Fire Station revisions as a result of exposing structural deficiencies and some revisions to the electrical room. Change Order No. 4 dealt with the modification of the "L"- shaped piers on the exterior of the building which were incorporated into the new colonnade. Change Order No. 5 added the Employee Restrooms and relocated the Fire Department air compressor. Change Order No. 6 incorporated the Police Detention Area requirements and changes to the Fire Station ceiling and entrance way plus security lighting for the ramp. Change Order No. 7_ added code requirements dealing with the duct work, floor drains, elevator pit and fire dampers, plus changes to the radiant heating in the fire apparatus bays. FN0 J 'I Page Two - PW89 -352 r"1 Change Order No. 8 added stonesd work to the masonry piers on the colonnade and the installation of a chain link fence on the lower ramp. Change Order No. 9 provided for electrical changes in the building and some modifications to the electrical system within the Fire Station. Change Order No. 10 adjusted the estimate for the employee restrooms and added the ramp, pedestrian bridge, curbing and waterproofing of the ramp structure. Change Order No. it was a housekeeping change to amend the actual costs for some of the previous change orders. Change Order No. 12 provided for additional smoke detectors and a number of work orders for incidental work requested to complete the Municipal center areas. It also provided for emergency power backup for the Fire Station as well as adjusting the estimate for the air compressor relocation and included some additional concrete work on the Plaza ramp. Change Order No. 13 consists of the modification to the screen and speakers in the Council meeting and Chambers area. JGF /ts Attachment 0 TOTAL TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS $178,914.43 $24,444.16 $75,020.00 $278,378.59 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS & ADJUSTMENTS $2,375,256.43 $251,810.16 $821,568.00 $3,448,634.59 CIVIC FIRE CENTER STATION RAMP TOTAL TOTAL ORIGINAL CONTRACTS 2,204,391.00 226,786.00 712,500.00 3,143,677.00 CONTRACT ADJUSTMENTS (8,049.00) 580.00 4,846.00 (2,623.00) PARK SETTLEMENT 0 0 29,202.00 29,202.00 SUB TOTAL 2,196,342.00 227,366.00 746,548.00 3,170,256.00 CHANGE ORDERS 1 13,374.00 2,596.00 $15,970.00 2 8,975.00 $8,975.00 3 8,834.00 8,793.00 3,530.00 $21,157.00 4 30,700.00 $30,700.00 5 25,000.00 6,000.00 $31,000.00 6 32,597.43 4,319.00 15,220.00 $52,136.43 7 33,673.00 1,784.16 $35,457.16 8 12,817.00 3,859.00 $16,676.00 9 3,323.00 3,375.00 35.00 $6,733.00 10 (9,700.00) 549.00 41,531.00 $32,380.00 11 580.00 $580.00 12 18,820.00 (2,972.00) 1,870.00 $17,718.00 13 8,896.00 $8,896.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS $178,914.43 $24,444.16 $75,020.00 $278,378.59 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS & ADJUSTMENTS $2,375,256.43 $251,810.16 $821,568.00 $3,448,634.59 MEMORANDUM city of Fridley _ 6431 university Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 66432 Phone (612)671 -8460 Office of the City Manager William W. Burns MEMO TO: John Flora, Public Works Director FROM William W. Burns, City Manager) / SUBJECT: Civic Center Change Orders DATE: September 12, 1989 Nancy Jorgenson has asked me to prepare some information that would enable her to converse with constituents about the Civic Center. In particular she wants to know the original cost for the Civic Center and the Fire Station as well as the original cost for the ramp. She would also like to have change orders detailed for each of the three parts of the project as well as a revised cost estimate for the completion of each of the three parts of the project. She says that she needs these in a couple of days. Thanks for your help. WWB /jb