HRA 12/03/1998 - 6304a -_
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1998
7:30 P.M.
PUBLIC COPY
(Please return to Community Development Department)
CITY OF FRIDLEY
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 3,1998,7:30 P.M.
AGENDA
LOCATION: City Council Chambers
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
October 1, 1998
CONSENT AGENDA
Consider Agreements Between the Fridley HRA and
the Cities of Mounds View, New Brighton, and Blaine
to act as Fiscal Agent for 1999 Metro Home & Garden Fair .............. 1
Consider Service Agreements with the Center
Energy & Environment (CEE) for the Administration of
the HOME Rehabilitation Grant Program ............................ 2
Authorize Chairperson to Sign the Final Plan
Mylars for the Fridley Executive Center ........................... . 3
Authorize Proposals for Professional Services to Assist HRA
with AUAR and ISP Applications for Medtronic Development ............. 4
Approve Resolution Authorizing
Pay Increase for HRA Employees ... ............................... 5
Approve Resolution Authorizing Extension
of Development Contract for Noah's Ark ............................. 6
Claims and Expenses (Oct. & Nov.) . ............................... 7
INFORMATION ITEMS
Update on Housing Program Evaluation Internship Project ................8
Medtronic Update ................. ..............................9
Request for TIF Assistance by Onan & Murphy Warehouse ...............10
OTHER BUSINESS
ADJOURNMENT
CITY OF FRIDLEY
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
OCTOBER 1, 1998
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Commers called the October 1, 1998, Housing and Redevelopment
Authority meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
ROL CALL•
Members Present: Larry Commers, John Meyer, Pat Gabel, Jim McFarland
Members Absent: Virginia Schnabel
Others Present: Barb Dacy, Community Development Director
Grant Femelius, Housing Coordinator
Jim Casserly, Financial Consultant
Rick Pribyl, Finance Director
Craig Ellestad, Accountant
Ben Martig, Housing /Special Projects Intern
Bill Schatzlein, Affordable Suburban Housing, Inc.
A TH R_ EETIN � � t AND REDE
MIN �TEc 8 H U I LOPME T
MO
—N-: by Mr. seconded b
1998 Housing and Meyer, yer, Selo by Mr. McFarland, to approve
g pment Authori esent the September 3,
Authority minutes as presented.
UPON A VOICE VOTE
ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMME RS DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
�NSENT AGENDA
1.
2.
A list of additional expenses was distributed uted to the Commissioners for review and
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, OCTOBER 1, 1998 PAGE 2
Mr. Commers stated he would like staff to provide a breakdown of Administrative
Personnel Services and City Insurance Allocations at the November meeting, if
possible.
MQIIQN by Mr. Meyer, seconded by Mr. McFarland, to approve the Consent Agenda
as presented.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COWERS DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ACTION ITEMS:
3. Ktt�V v ��.,� r. -
ex lained that this item was tabled at the September meeting to allow
Mr. Femelius p He noted that a review appraisal was
staff to obtain a review appraisal of the property.
which came in approximately $7,000 to $8,000 less than ave indicated that the
completed appraisal was presented to the bank. They and that they
appraisal. The review app the purchase price of the property
they are not interested in renego;et for it on the open market. Mr. Femelius has
would like to see what they can g wish to reconsider. This item can event that they
requested that they contact us in tnda for further consideration.
be officially removed from the age Agenda.
MOTION by Mr. McFarland, seconded by Mr. Meyer, to strike Item 3. from the
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN COMMERS
D THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. N
DECLARE _ _ . �, � ci IRl1RE3nni NFU
4. VCNTL ,
fQEVEILE Under
on behalf of Affordable Suburban
N E Housing,
the vacant lot at 5800 2 S
Mr. Femelius explained that to developn�
M on the site which would bu affordable
Inc., has submitted a proposal The Y
the proposal, a new home would bten 80 � oftmedian income ►units.
to families whose incomes home buyer• cured to follow all of
need to be a firs ousing would be required
note that Affordable Suburban H constructed with a
fines that have been established for the
Mr. Femelius n guidelines They
e HRA design and construction 9 a house would have to be reserve the site
the a program. Additionally,
Site e value of both the land d but es
Scattered Si 95,000 including the ation Agreement which reared.
minimum value of $ ht and plans were p P
d be required to execute the e a buyer was $O' resented to the HRA• The
would eriod of time package would be p
for a specified p accomplish the entire p
After such was accomplish for a mOtt9age loan.
buyer would need to q
d
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, OCTOBER 1, 1998 PAGE 3
Mr. Femelius stated that in order to make this project affordable, the petitioner has
asked that the HRA sell the land for $1.00 and issue a second mortgage in favor of the
end buyer which would defer the land sale price of approximately $22,000 until the
home is resold in the future, or is no longer occupied by the buyer. This would reduce
the first mortgage amount.
Mr. Commers asked if this would meet the City's replacement affordable housing
obligations with respect to the Federal government. Mr. Femelius stated he would
need to research this. However, if the property
within the guidelines, the City would be working toward to
that family al whose income falls
Mr. Commers asked that staff research the federal requirements to determine whether
this would meet the City's affordable housing replacement obligations.
Ms. Gabel asked how the lender views the land value.
Mr. Schatzlein stated the house will be appraised out at the value of both the land and
the building. Since the HRA will have the second mortgage, the lender will view this
as equity.
Mr. Femelius noted that at this time staff is seeking conceptual approval. If approved,
the developer would need to find a buyer and prepare the necessary plans for HRA
approval.
MOTION by Mr. Meyer, seconded by Mr. McFarland, to approve the concept for the
Proposal by Affordable Suburban Housing, Inc., to develop vacant land at 5800 Second
Street N.E., subject to approval of a final plan by the HRA.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
5. CONRin =Q D00f%, i ----- - - --
Ms. Dacy outlined the changes which were made to the Letter of Intent dated
September 24, 1998, and executed by Medtronic.
Mr. Commers asked if Mayor Jorgenson and the Council members have approved of
the execution of the Letter of Intent.
Ms. Dacy explained that the Letter of Intent is between the HRA and Medtronic. The
City will later be asked to approve the master plan process and any transportation
planning issues /changes.
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, OCTOBER 1, 1998 PAGE 4
Mr. Casserly stated that this document expresses the basic outlines of agreements yet
to come. By executing the document, the HRA is basically consenting to the terms.
The Council members have been extensively briefed on the document, and they have
indicated their consent to the items in the Letter of Intent.
Mr. Commers stated he merely wants to assure that there are no interferences in the
event that one of the issues arises in the future.
Mr. Casserly stated this remains a concern to all and is an issue which will need to be
resolved. One option may be to have some type of agreement which would include
the City Council.
MOTION by Ms. Gabel, seconded by Mr. Meyer, to approve Resolution No. HRA 17-
1998, Authorizing Execution and Delivery of a Letter of Intent by and between the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Fridley, Minnesota, and
Medtronic, Inc.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
INFORMATION ITEMS:
6. UPDATE ON HOUSING AND SPECIAL PROJECTS INTERN:
Mr. Ben Martig, the Housing and Special Projects Intern, was introduced to the HRA
members. He provided a brief summary of his background as well as some of the
responsibilities he will have during his internship at Fridley.
OTHER BUSINESS:
Mr. Fernelius provided the HRA members with an update on the Housing program. He
noted that four reports were included in a packet.
Mr. Commers stated that in regard to the Delinquency Report, he still is waiting for staff
to put together some type of policy to address this ongoing problem.
Ms. Dacy stated that staff prepared a memo and the HRA did agree on some of the
administrative procedures that would be implemented. A copy will be sent to the HRA
members.
Mr. Meyer stated that he continues to remain concerned about the few loans that have
been made to residents in the Hyde Park area. He feels the program is just not
reaching that area, and perhaps the policy is too liberal for the rest of the areas in the
City. The program is failing to do the job that the HRA originally planned to accomplish.
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, OCTOBER 1, 1998 PAGE 5
Ms. Gabel agreed with Mr. Meyer that perhaps the income guidelines are not
appropriate.
Ms. Dacy stated that she intends to conduct some type of survey or demographic
studies to see where the mismatch is between income guidelines and housing needs.
If possible, she would like to have this information available at the December meeting.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Mr. Meyer, seconded by Mr. McFarland, to adjourn the meeting.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE MEETING WAS
OFFICIALLY ADJOURNED AT 8:33 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
I O- yy-)O- L'0- 7
Tamara D. Saefke
Recording Secretary
a,
MEMORANDUM
HOUSING
,- � l
REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
DATE: November 25, 1998
TO: William W. Bums, Executive Director of HRA
f�J✓
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Grant Femelius, Housing Coordinator
SUBJECT: Consider Agreements Between the Fridley HRA and the
Cities of Mounds View, New Brighton and Blaine for the
1999 North Metro Home and Garden Fair.
The first annual North Metro Home and Garden Fair will be held on Saturday,
February 27, 1999 at the Mounds View Community Center. The fair is spon-
sored by the cities of Fridley, Mounds View, New Brighton, and Blaine. Each city
has agreed to contribute $2,000 toward the cost of event. The Fridley HRA will
act as the fiscal agent to collect the funds from each city and then pay the
expenses for the fair.
Rather than draft a four party agreement, each city will execute a separate
agreement with the Fridley HRA. Attached are copies of the agreements which
have been prepared. Fritz Knaak the Fridley City Attorney has reviewed the
documents and feels they are acceptable.
Recommendation
Staff recommends the HRA approve the individual agreements with the cities of
Mounds View, New Brighton and Blaine for the 1999 North Metro Home and
Garden Fair.
M -98 -229
1
Agreement
This Agreement is made between the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority (hereinafter the
"HRA ") and the Blaine Economic Development Authority (hereinafter, the "EDA ") on this day November 5, 1998.
The City of Blaine agrees to co- sponsor a mutli- community home and garden fair with the cities of Mounds
View, Fridley and Arden Hills. The fair, to be known as the North Metro Home and Garden Fair, will be held at
the Mounds View Community Center on February 27, 1999 from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. The fair will encompass
many aspects of home building or home remodeling, and is intended to serve as a benefit to the residents of the four
cities sponsoring the event.
The HRA agrees to act as the fiscal agent responsible for finances associated with the fair. The EDA
agrees to pay $2,000 to the HRA as its share of the costs to be incurred by the HRA for the planning, advertising
and execution of the North Metro Home and Garden Fair.
The HRA agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the EDA and its officers, agents, and employees against
any claim, demand, suit, action, or other proceeding arising pursuant to the Agreement resulting from actions or
failures to act by the HRA or its governing body members, officers, agents, or employees, provided that the
foregoing indemnification shall not be effective for any actions of the HRA that are not contemplated by this
Agreement.
The HRA acknowledges that it has sole responsibility for paying all amounts due to various parties
servicing the North Metro Home and Garden Fair. The HRA agrees that the $2,000 paid by the EDA pursuant to
this Agreement will be used solely for the purposes of planning, advertising and executing the North Metro Home
and Garden Fair. The HRA further agrees to refund any portion of the $2,000 that is generated through revenues
from the North Metro Home and Garden Fair on a pro -rata basis among the participating cities. If no revenues are
generated from the North Metro Home and Garden Fair, the EDA acknowledges that it will not be refunded any
portion of the $2,000 paid to the HRA.
The HRA acknowledges that the City of Blaine is entitled to the use of a booth at the North Metro Home and
Garden Fair.
FRIDLEY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
By:
Lawrence R. Commers
Its Chair
By:
William W. Burns
Its Executive Director
BLAINE 7xr4� NU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
By
Tom Ryan
Its Presidet�)
i
By:
Roge W. Fr er
Its Executive Director
C:VWy D=tnwtsW=e and Garden ShowW9rwaWt doe
1 -A
. t,
AGREEMENT.
This agreement is made between the Fridley Housing Redevelopment Authority
(hereinafter the "Fridley HRK) and the Mounds View Economic Development Authority
(hereinafter, the "Mounds View EDA") on this day November 9,1998.
The City of Mounds View agrees to co- sponsor a multi - community home and garden
fair with the cities of Blaine, Fridley and New Brighton. The fair, to be known as the
North Metro Home and Garden Fair, will be held at the Mounds View Community
Center on February 27, 1999 from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. The fair will encompass many
aspects of home building or home remodeling, and is intended to serve as a benefit to
the residents of the four cities sponsoring the event.
The Fridley HRA agrees to act as the fiscal agent responsible for the finances
associated with the fair. The Mounds View EDA agrees to pay $2,000 to the Fridley
HRA as its share of the costs to be incurred by the Fridley HRA for the planning,
advertising and execution of the-North Metro Home and Garden Fair.
Except for any breach of the representation of the Fridley HRA, any willful
misrepresentation of any willful or wanton misconduct of the Fridley HRA, or the
negligence or other wrongful act or omission of any officers, agents and employees of
the Fridley HRA, the Mounds View EDA agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the
Fridley HRA and its officers, agents, employees against any claim, demand, suit, action,
or other proceeding arising pursuant to the Agreement resulting from actions or failures
to act by the Fridley HRA or its governing body members, officers, agents, or
employees, provided that the foregoing indemnification shall not be effective for any
actions of the Fridley HRA that are not contemplated by this Agreement.
The Fridley HRA acknowledges that it is has sole responsibility for paying all amounts
due to various parties servicing the North Metro Home and Garden Fair. The Fridley
HRA agrees that the $2,000 paid by the Mounds View EDA pursuant to this agreement
will be used solely for the purposes of planning, advertising and executing the North
Metro Home and Garden Fair. The Fridley HRA further agrees to refund any portion of
the $2,000 that is generated through revenues from the North Metro Home and Garden
Fair on a pro -rata basis among the participating cities. If no revenues are generated
from the North Metro Home and Garden Fair, the Mounds View EDA acknowledges that
it will not be refunded any portion of the $2,000 paid to the Fridley HRA.
The Fridley HRA acknowledges that the City of Mounds View is entitled to the use of a
booth at the North Metro Home and Garden Fair.
Mounds View Agreement ■ B
FRIDLEY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
By
Lawrence R. Commers
Its Chair
By:
William W. Bums
Its Executive Director
MOUNDS VIEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
By:
Duane McCarty
Its President
By:
Charles S. Whiting
Its Executive Director
Mounds View Agreement
• MOV -23 -98 MON 1:39 PM CITI OF.NEWARIGHTOMM FAX N0. 6126382044 P. 2
Agreement
This agreement is made between the Fridley Housing Redevelopment Authority (hereinafter
the "Fridley HRA") and the City of New Brighton (hereinafter, "New Brighton") on this day
November _,1998.
The City of New Brighton agrees to co- sponsor a multi- community home and garden fair
with the cities of Blaine, Fridley and Mounds View. The fair, to be known as the North Metro
Home and Garden Fair, will be held at the Mounds View Community Center on February 27, 1999
from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. The fair will encompass many aspects of home building or home
remodeling, and is intended to serve as a benefit to the residents of the four cities sponsoring the
event.
The Fridley HRA agrees to act as the fiscal agent responsible for the finances associated
with the fair. The City of New Brighton agrees to pay $2,000 to the Fridley HRA as its share of the
costs to be incurred by the Fridley HRA for the planning, advertising and execution of the North
Metro Home and Garden Fair.
The Fridley HRA acknowledges that it is has sole responsibility £or.paying all amounts due
to various parities servicing the North Metro Home and Garden Fair. The Fridley HRA agrees that
the $2,000 paid by the City of New Brighton pursuant to this agreement will be used solely for the
purposes of planning, advertising and executing the North Metro Home and Garden Fair. The
Fridley BRA further agrees to refund any portion of the $2,000 that is generated through revenues
from the North Metro Home and Garden Fair on a pro -rata basis among the participating cities. If
no revenues are generated from the North Metro Home and Garden Fair, the City of New Brighton
acknowledges that it will not be refunded any portion of the $2,000 paid to the Fridley HRA.
The Fridley BRA acknowledges that the City of New Brighton is entitled to the use of a
booth at the North Metro Home and Garden Fair.
FRIDLEY HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
By:
Lawrence R Commers
Its Chair
By:
William W. Burns
Its Executive Director
1: =1W.0w9CWAWA.WM 1 _®
CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON
Robert Benke
Its Mayor
M:
Matthew S. Fulton
Its Manager
MEMORANDUM
HOUSING
REDEVELOPMENT
DATE: November 25, 1998
AUTHORITY
TO: William W. Bums, Executive Director of HRA '14�/
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Grant Femelius, Housing Coordinator
SUBJECT: Consider Service Agreements with the Center for Energy
and Environment (CEE) for Administration of the HOME
Rehabilitation Grant Program.
This memo describes two separate agreements for HRA consideration at the
December 3,1998 meeting.
1. Extension to 1996 Contract
In October of 1996 the HRA and CEE entered into a service agreement for
administration of the HOME rehabilitation grant program. The program provides
assistance to low- income homeowners for home improvements and basic
repairs. CEE's responsibilities include processing the applications, verifying
eligibility, conducting inspections, preparing work write -ups, monitoring work
progress, and verifying that all of the work has been done in a satisfactory
manner. Prior to CEE's involvement this function was administered by ACCAP.
The term of the original agreement ran from October 15, 1996 through
December 31, 1997. Due to an oversight the contract should have been
extended earlier this year. The proposed extension would allow CEE to process
applications and complete the files through December 31, 1999. The HOME
funds can only be used in specific target neighborhoods. CEE has received
numerous inquires about the program and has over 20 applications pending.
Attached are a copy of the extension agreement and a map of the target areas.
2
CEE Service Agreements
November 25, 1998
Page 2
This is a separate agreement between the HRA and CEE which covers the
portion of the program funded with 1998 HOME money. The term of the
agreement would run from December 3, 1998, to July 1, 2000, which runs
concurrent with the County's time line. The budget for the program is $81,250
($65,000 in HOME funds and $16,250 in HRA funds). A copy of agreement is
attached.
Staff recommends that the HRA take the following action:
Approve the extension to the agreement with the Center for Energy and
Environment for administration of the 1996 HOME Rehabilitation Grant
Program.
2. Approve the agreement with the Center for Energy and Environment for
administration of the 1998 HOME Rehabilitation Grant Program.
M -98 -230
2 -A
AGREEMENT FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Between
CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT
And
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
The Agreement, made the 111' day of October, 1996, by and between The Housing and Redevelopment
Authority In and For the City of Fridley, a body corporate and politic existing under the laws of the State
of Minnesota (the "Authority"), and the Center for Energy and Environment, a 501(c)(3) non - profit
corporation, with its offices at Butler Square Building, 100 North 61" Street, Suite 412A, Minneapolis,
Minnesota 55403 -1520 (the "Contractor") is hereby amended.
Section 1 of the agreement shall read:
TERM
The project to be accomplished by the Contractor hereunder shall run from October 15, 1996 to
December 31, 1999 unless earlier terminated as provided herein, or until all obligations set forth in this
Agreement have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first.
All other sections of the Agreement shall remain as written in the original agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties here hereunder set their hands as of the date written below:
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
By—
Date
BY—
Date
Lawrence R. Commers, Chair
William W. Bums, Executive Director
By
Date
Sheldon Strom, Executive Director
\WB* "\DOfS\Ad *1 \C0ffWCI\LWn ftWM \607H FRIDLEY HOME Amendmentdoc Novanber 17, 1998
B
AGREEMENT FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
between
CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
and
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
(1998 HOME Program)
THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 1998, the date of the
signatures of the parties herein notwithstanding, by and between the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Fridley, a body corporate and politic
existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the "Authority "), and the Center for
Energy and Environment, Incorporated, a 501(c)(3) non - profit corporation, with its
offices at Butler Square Building, 100 North 6th Street, Suite 412 A, Minneapolis,
Minnesota 55403 -1520 (the "Contractor").
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, The HOME Investments Partnership Act (the "HOME Program ") provides
assistance to state and local governments to strengthen public- private partnerships to
provide more affordable housing; and
WHEREAS, the Authority has submitted an application to Anoka County for HOME
Program funds; and
WHEREAS, said application has received approval by Anoka County and the United
States Department of Housing and Urban Development for the expenditure of funds, in
part, to deliver the Fridley Home Improvement Grant Program (the "Program "); and
WHEREAS, the Contractor has agreed to administer said Program for the Authority,
which proposal has been accepted by the Authority.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the
parties agree as follows:
1. TERM
The project to be accomplished by the Contractor hereunder shall run from December
3, 1998 to July 1, 2000 unless earlier terminated as provided herein, or until all
obligations set forth in this Agreement have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever
occurs first.
98CEEContract
2. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED
A. The Contractor shall provide the following services to administer the
Program:
(1) Coordinate marketing efforts with the Authority and. answer
questions from interested parties concerning the Program. In
addition, the Contractor shall maintain up -to -date application
materials including, but not limited to, application forms, program
brochures and related literature.
(2) Receive applications from interested parties and determine
eligibility status with regard to household income, amount of
assets, ownership status, type of property and other criteria as
specified by the Authority.
(3) Notify applicants in writing within 10 business days of receipt of
application as to their eligibility status. If an application is
incomplete, the Contractor shall notify the applicant within the 10
day period to request additional information.
(Applicants which qualify for the Program are defined as "Program
Recipients ".)
(4) Verify property title records to determine whether applicant has
good title to the property; confirm in writing that the applicant is
current on property taxes and mortgage payments and that there
are no unsatisfied judgments or liens. In addition, Contractor
shall prepare the necessary Repayment Agreement to be signed
and recorded prior to the start of the rehabilitation work.
(5) Within 30 business days of receipt of application, the Contractor
shall schedule and conduct an inspection of the applicant's
property. Said inspection shall be conducted by qualified
personnel of the Contractor who are trained and experienced in
housing rehabilitation. Said inspection shall be used as the basis
of preparing a scope of work and related project specifications.
The Contractor and Authority will meet to review minimum
rehabilitation standards, eligible improvements, minimum product
quality, work write -up format, and bidding procedures. Said
98CEEContract
scope of work shall be completed and returned to the Program
Recipient within 60 days of receipt of application.
(6) Contractor shall provide guidance to the Program Recipients on
obtaining and evaluating estimates. Program Recipients shall have
30 days to obtain estimates.
(7) Meet with Program Recipients to review estimates and assist them
in selecting a remodeling contractor per the Program requirements.
(8) Contractor shall submit complete file with all original documents to
the Authority for review and approval. Upon Authority approval, the
Contractor shall schedule and conduct a pre - construction
conference with the Program Recipients and the remodeling
contractor prior to commencement of the work. Contractor shall
review the responsibilities of each party, procedures for payment
and any other pertinent details. Finally, both parties shall execute
a contract to secure performance of the project and Contractor
shall issue a Proceed to Work Order.
(9) Contractor shall insure that the successful remodeling contractor
complies with the applicable HUD and County regulations. In
addition, Contractor shall monitor performance of the rehabilitation
work and assist Program Recipient in resolving disputes with the
remodeling contractor, as necessary.
(10) Conduct interim and final inspections and prepare the necessary
documents to process payment to the remodeling contractor.
B. In addition to the processing steps outlined above, the Contractor shall
provide the following services:
98CEEContract
(1) Comply with the Housing Rehabilitation Procedures Guide, as
amended from time to time.
(2) Provide the Authority with monthly reports on the status of Program
applications.
(3) Make payments to remodeling contractors on a timely basis, in
compliance with the Federal "three -day rule ".
(4) Obtain mechanic's liens from all remodeling contractors,
subcontractors, and material suppliers, prior to release of any
payments.
C. The Contractor shall proceed with the administration of the Program as
contained in the Program Budget, attached as Exhibit A and made a part
of this Agreement by reference, representing Contractor's minimum
responsibilities to the extent that said proposals have not been
accomplished prior to the date of this Agreement as entered into and to
the extent said proposals do not contradict the standards and
requirements referred to above.
D. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to meet all standards and
satisfy all requirements expressed in Title I of the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974 as amended and the HUD
Implementary Regulations at 24 CFR, Part 570, and any other applicable
federal statutes, rules, or regulations established now or hereafter, and
any applicable statutes, rules, regulations, or guidelines established now
or hereafter by the State of Minnesota or any of its agencies. Should it
appear to the Contractor at any time during the course of implementing
said project, that the work to be done has not been explained or described
in sufficient detail, or with sufficient clarity, or should it appear that any
plan, proposal, or other material conflict with any standards or
requirements imposed by statute, regulation, or HUD, the Contractor shall
promptly contact the Authority's Housing Coordinator or other designated
representative. In no event shall the Contractor proceed with
administration of said project in uncertainty. The Contractor shall comply
with the following requirements and standards of OMB Circular No. A -122,
"Cost Principles for Non Profit Organizations" or OMB Circular No. A -21,
"Cost Principles for Educational Institutions ", as applicable, and with the
following Attachments to OMB Circular No. A -110:
(1) Attachment A, "Cash Depositories ", except for paragraph 4
concerning deposit insurance;
(2) Attachment B, "Bonding and Insurance'
98CEEContract
(3) Attachment C, 'Retention and Custodial Requirements for
Records ", except that in lieu of the provisions of paragraph 4, the
retention period for records pertaining to individual HOME
activities starts from the date of submission of the annual
performance and evaluation report, as prescribed in 570.507, in
which the specific activity is reported on for the final time;
(4) Attachment F, "Standards for Financial Management Systems';
(5) Attachment H, "Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance ",
paragraph 2;
(6) Attachment N, "Property Management Standards ", except for
paragraph 3 concerning the standards for real property, and except
that paragraphs 6 and 7 are so modified so that
(i) In all cases in which personal property is sold, the proceeds
shall be program income, and
(ii) Personal property not needed by the subrecipient for HOME
activities shall be transferred to the recipient for the HOME
program or shall be retained after compensating the
recipient; and
(7) Attachment O, 'Procurement Standards ".
3. PROJECT METHODOLOGY AND PROCEDURE
The Contractor, in providing the services described in Section 2 of this Agreement, shall
employ methods and procedures that are deemed to be appropriate, reliable, and
professional by individuals, firms, and associations regularly engaged in work of a
similar nature. The methods and procedures employed shall include those required by
the sources of authority specified in Section 2, herein, but shall not necessarily be
limited to such methods and procedures.
4. PROJECT EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE
In order that the Authority may be kept informed of the Contractor's progress and
properly evaluate the success of the Contractor in achieving the Agreement goals, the
98CEEContract
Authority may make suggestions, criticisms, and recommendations to the Contractor
and the Contractor shall on a monthly basis and at other times upon request by the
Authority, send a written progress report to the Authority's Housing Coordinator. Said
report shall a) summarize the activities and progress of the Contractor to date, b) detail
special problems or difficulties that have arisen during the course of the project which
need to be brought to the attention of the Authority and c) summarize any other
information, problems, or proposals which the Authority needs to know in order to
properly evaluate the actions of the Contractor in working towards the Agreement goal.
The Contractor shall thoroughly and conscientiously implement the proposals,
recommendations, and criticisms of the Authority or its designated representative, in
writing, before proceeding further with the implementation of the program so that the
goals of this Agreement may be met to the satisfaction of the Authority.
Any deviations from the goals, standards, and requirements of the project as
determined by said designated representatives of the Authority shall be corrected by
the Contractor before proceeding further with the implementation of said project.
5. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION, PERSONNEL, AND RECORDS
A. The Contractor shall engage in the implementation of the Program, such
individuals as are necessary for its proper completion. The Contractor
warrants and represents that all of its employees shall be properly trained,
competent and qualified to perform the tasks assigned to them. The
Contractor shall provide the Authority with such information regarding the
qualifications of said individuals as required by the Authority to verify that
present and subsequent services are being rendered by competent and
trained people. All individuals engaged by the Contractor to perform
services under this Agreement must receive express approval of the
Authority before commencing any services under the Agreement. Any or
all of said individuals may be regular employees of the Contractor or may
be specifically employed by the Contractor as independent contractors to
work on the implementation of said project. However, the Contractor shall
not subcontract with any other firms, associations, consulting agencies, or
other organizations for the implementation of the Program, without the
expressed written approval of the Authority.
B. The Contractor shall maintain records on all individuals employed by it in
the implementation of the Program. Said records shall show the name
and qualifications of each such individual, the hourly rate of pay
98CEEContract
� •i,
for each such individual, and the number of hours worked by each such
individual, and the days on which such hours were worked. The
Contractor shall also maintain, and complete in correct form, all
other records required by the rules, regulations, or guidelines of HUD or
by Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 as
amended and the HUD Implementary Regulations at 24 CFR, Part 570.
The Contractor further agrees to maintain all such required records for
three years after receipt of final payment or until all other pending
matters are closed.
6. DATA PRIVACY
All data collected, created, received, maintained, or disseminated, or used for any
purposes in the course of the Contractor performance of this Agreement is governed by
the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes 1984, Section
13.01 et. seq. or any other applicable State statutes and any State rules adopted to
implement the Act, as well as State statutes and Federal regulations on data privacy.
The Contractor agrees to abide by these statutes, rules, and regulations and as they
may be amended.
7. NONDISCRIMINATION
A. General
98CEEContract
The Contractor shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws
prohibiting discrimination on the basis of age, sex, marital status, race,
creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, or the presence of any
sensory, mental, or physical handicap or any other basis now or hereafter
prohibited by Law. These requirements are specified in Section 109 of
the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974; Civil Rights Act of
1964, Title VI; Civil Rights Act of 1968, Title VIII; Executive Order 11063;
Executive Order 11246; Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development
Act of 1968; and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 363. Specifically, the
Contractor is prohibited from taking any discriminatory actions defined in
the HUD Regulations at 24 CFR 570.602(b) (1 -3) and shall take such
affirmative and corrective actions as are required by the Regulations at
CFR 570.602(b)(4).
B. Program Benefit
The Contractor shall not discriminate against any resident or Program
recipient by denying benefit from or participation in any block grant
funded activity on the basis of race, color, sex, or national origin. (Civil
Rights Act of 1964, Title VI; Civil Rights Act of 1968, Title VII; Section
109, Housing and Community Development Act of 1974).
C. Fair Housing
The Contractor shall take necessary and appropriate actions to prevent
discrimination on the basis of Minnesota State law or federal law in
federally assisted housing and lending practices related to loans insured
or guaranteed by the federal government.'(Civil Rights Act of 1968, Title
VII; Executive Order 11063; Minnesota Statutes Chapter 363).
D. Employment
In all solicitations under this Agreement, the Contractor shall state
that all qualified applicants will be considered for employment. The
words "equal opportunity employer" in advertisements shall
constitute compliance with this section.
2. The Contractor shall not discriminate against an employee or
applicant for employment in connection with this Agreement
because of age, marital status, race, creed, color, national origin,
sexual orientation, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or
physical handicap, except when there is a bona fide occupational
limitation. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the
following: Employment; upgrading, demotion or transfer,
recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of
pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training.
(Executive Order 11246 as amended and Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 363.)
3. To the greatest extent feasible, the Contractor shall provide training
and employment opportunities for lower income residents within the
area served by block grant assisted projects (Section 3, Housing
and Community Development Act of 1968, as amended).
98CEEContract
3•
E. Contractors and Suppliers
No contractor, subcontractor, union, or vendor engaged in any
activity under this Agreement shall discriminate in the sale of
materials, equipment, or labor on the basis of age, sex, marital
status, race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, or the
presence of any sensory, mental, or physical handicap. Such
practices include upgrading, demotion, recruiting, transfer, layoff,
termination, pay rate, and advertisement for employment.
(Executive Order 11246 as amended and Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 363).
2. All firms and organizations described above shall be required to
submit to the Agency certificates of compliance demonstrating that
they have, in fact, complied with the foregoing provisions; provided,
that certificates of compliance shall not be required
from firms and organizations on contracts and /or yearly sales of
less than $10,000.
3. To the greatest extent feasible, the Contractor shall purchase
supplies and services for activities under this Agreement from
vendors and contractors whose businesses are located in the area
served by block grant funded activities or owned in substantial part
by project area residents. (Section 3, Housing and Community
Development Act of 1968, as amended.)
F. Notice
1. The Contractor shall include the provisions of the appropriate
subsections A, B, C, D, and E of this section in every contract or
purchase order for goods and services under this Agreement and
shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with
which it has a collective bargaining Agreement or other contract or
understanding a notice advising the said labor union or worker's
representative of the commitments made in these subsections.
2. In advertising for employees, goods, or services for activities under this
Agreement, the Contractor shall utilize minority publications in addition to
publications of general circulation.
98CEEContract
N
8. EARLY TERMINATION
This Agreement may be terminated by the Authority at any time, with or without cause,
upon 30 days written notice, delivered by mail or in person, to the Contractor. This
Agreement may be terminated by the Authority immediately upon the receipt by the
Authority of notice of the loss of federal funding for the HOME Program . For purposes
of giving notices hereunder, the address of the Contractor is The Butler Square
Building, 100 North 6th Street, Suite 412 -A, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 -1520.
Upon termination, the Contractor shall be entitled to receive as compensation, payment
for work actually performed to the date of termination as determined by the schedule of
payment referred to in Section 10 (Compensation).
9. DEFAULT AND REMEDY
A. Any of the following constitutes a default on the part of the Contractor:
(1) Failure to proceed with the implementation of the Program at a
pace reasonably calculated to implement such program within the
time limits stated herein;
(2) Failure to conscientiously abide by the directions of the Authority.
(3) Failure to abide by any other term or condition of this Agreement.
B. In the event of default, the Authority shall have the option of terminating
this Agreement upon written notice of termination sent to the Contractor at
its address written above. Termination shall be effective immediately
upon receipt of notice of termination by the Contractor, or at such later
date as the written notice shall state. Upon termination, the Authority may
recover from the Contractor any and all damages directly or consequently
arising out of the breach of this Agreement or failure to perform the same
by the Contractor.
10. COMPENSATION
A. Administrative Services
As compensation for the services to be performed hereunder by the
Contractor, the Contractor shall be paid a fixed fee of $875.00 per grant
98CEEContract
10
made. The Contractor shall invoice the Authority for services rendered
after the grant has been approved and a Proceed to Work Order has
been issued by the Authority. The Contractor may submit one invoice
per month, which shall cover the grants made during that month. The
Authority shall provide the Contractor with the appropriate forms and
documents to submit for reimbursement.
B. Rehabilitation Assistance
The Contractor shall submit a separate invoice for each grant made.
The invoice shall state, at a minimum, the name of the Program
Recipients, their address, and the full amount of grant. Within 15 days
of receipt of the invoice, the Authority shall remit to the Contractor a
check for the amount of the grant. Said funds shall be deposited into
an interest - bearing checking account, held in trust for the Authority. The
Contractor shall issue payment to the remodeling contractors as work is
completed. Before issuing payment to a remodeling contractor, the
Contractor must do the following:
(1) Inspect the work to ensure that it has been completed
satisfactorily.
(2) Obtain a signed lien waiver from the contractor, subcontractor
and /or material suppliers for the amount of the work.
(3) Obtain the signatures of the homeowner and the remodeling
contractor.
(4) Verify with the Authority that a permit has been obtained for the
work performed and that the remodeling contractor is properly
licensed.
11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
The relationship of the Contractor to the Authority is that of an independent contractor.
Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed so as to deem any employee or agent of
the Contractor an employee of the Authority for any purpose.
98CEEContract
11
12. GOODS AND SERVICES NOT PROVIDED FOR
No claim for goods or services furnished by the Contractor not provided for by the terms
of this Agreement, or by duly authorized alterations or modifications of this Agreement,
will be honored by the Authority.
13. CHANGES IN THIS AGREEMENT
The Authority shall notify the Contractor in writing at least five days before any change
in this Agreement is to take effect.
14. ASSIGNMENTS AND SUBCONTRACTING
A. The Contractor shall not assign any portion of this Agreement without the
written consent of the Authority, and it is further agreed that said consent
must be sought by the Contractor not less than thirty (30) days prior to the
date of any proposed assignment.
B. Any work or services assigned or subcontracted hereunder shall be
subject to each provision of this Agreement and proper bidding
procedures contained therein. The Contractor agrees that it is as fully
responsible to the Authority for the acts and omissions of its
subcontractors and of their employees and agents, as it is for the acts and
omissions of its own employees and agents.
15. INDEMNIFICATION
The Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Authority (including
its board members, officers, and employees) from all claims, losses, or damages which
they, or any of them shall be legally obligated to pay as a consequence of any negligent
act or omission, any intentional tort, or any violation of the terms of this Agreement, by
the Contractor (including its officers, employees, and agents) in the performance of its
services that are the subject of this Agreement.
16. REVERSION OF ASSETS
Upon the expiration or termination of this Agreement, the Contractor shall transfer to
the Authority any HOME funds on hand or in the accounts receivable attributable to the
98CEEContract
12
use of HOME funds. In addition, at the expiration or termination of this Agreement, any
real property under the Contractor's control that was acquired or improved in
whole or in part with HOME funds in excess of $25,000.00 shall be disposed of in a
manner which results in the agency being reimbursed in the amount of the current fair
market value of the property less any portion thereof attributable to the expenditures of
non -HOME funds for acquisition of, or improvement to, the real property. Such
reimbursement shall not be required if the conditions of 24 CFR State Statute
570.503(b)(8)(i) are met and satisfied.
17. DISPOSITION OF PROGRAM INCOME
Upon the expiration or termination of this Agreement, program income shall be returned
by the Contractor to the Authority.
18. INSURANCE
The Contractor shall comply with the following insurance requirements:
A. Public Liability Insurance
The Contractor shall obtain and maintain continuously during the term of
this Agreement general liability insurance of an amount not less than
One Million and no /100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars which covers bodily
injury and property damage and an umbrella excess liability policy of
Three Million and no /100 ($3,000,000.00) Dollars and provide proof of
Worker's Compensation Insurance pursuant to the Statutes of the State
of Minnesota. The general liability insurance policy and umbrella excess
liability policy shall name the Authority as an additional insured.
B. Proof of Insurance
The Contractor shall provide certificates of insurance required under this
section, or, upon request of the Authority, duplicates of the policies as
evidence of the insurance protection afforded. Such insurance policies
shall not be reduced or canceled without sixty (60) days prior written
notice to the Authority.
19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT /REQUIREMENT OF A WRITING
It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement of the parties is contained
98CEEContract
13
herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations
between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous
Contract presently in effect between the Authority and the Contractor relating to the
subject matter hereof. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of the
provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when they have been reduced to writing
and duly signed by the parties.
20. EXHIBITS
The following attachments listed below are hereby incorporated in this Agreement and
made a part hereof:
Exhibit A - Program Budget
Exhibit B - Certification
Exhibit C - 24 CFR 85; Contracting with small and minority firms, women's business
enterprise, and labor surplus area firms.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunder set their hands as of the date written
below:
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE
CITY OF FRIDLEY
By
Its
Date
By
Its
Date
98CEEContract
14
CENTER FOR ENERGY AND
ENVIRONMENT, INC.
By
Its
Date
By
Its
Date
I
,t
Source
1998 HOME Allocation
HRA Match
Uses
Home Improvement Grants
Program Administration
98CEEContract
EXHIBIT A
15
Amount
$65,000
$16,250
$81,250
$76,150
$5,1000
$81,250
MEMORANDUM
HOUSING
REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
DATE: November 24, 1998
TO: William Bums, Executive Director of HRA AV
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Authorize Chairperson to Execute Final Plat Mylars
for Fridley Executive Center
Background
On March 3, 1998, the City Council approved a preliminary plat for the Fridley
Executive Center based on the application by MEPC American Properties for a one
story building and 25,000 square feet of office space. As a result of Medtronic's interest
in the site, the final plat has been revised to simply describe the property in two outlots
(one outlot for the Torrens described portion and one outlet for the abstract described
portion).
Final Plat
Because the site is described by both metes and bounds descriptions (which are very
lengthy), as well as plat descriptions, it was decided to amend the plat to create simple
outlots to eliminate confusing descriptions. In addition, recording the plat would simplify
the description of the area adjacent to TH 65 which was turned back from MnDOT to
the City several years ago. Approximately half of the area (about 30,000 square feet is
incorporated into the lot for development), and the other half will be dedicated as part of
the TH 65 right -of -way.
At the November 9, 1998, City Council meeting, staff recommended that the City
Council approve the final plat describing the site in two outlots. The City Council
approved the resolution authorizing the Mayor and the City Manager to sign the plat.
Because the HRA is the property owner, the HRA should also authorize the
Chairperson to sign the plat.
3
Final Plat Mylars for Fridley Executive Center
November 24, 1998
Page 2
Once the Chairperson signs the plat, staff will have the surveyor record the plat at
Anoka County. Filing the plat as proposed will save a significant amount of time for the
HRA, the title company, and Medtronic when they file their plat next spring.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the HRA approve a motion authorizing the Chairperson to sign
the final plat mylars and to direct staff to record the plat at Anoka County.
BD:ls
M -98 -228
3 -A
Q _
W O n
o Z N8-° . e5 5 5
Is
EEg
ijs
e�88• 5a2§r a � � a E �Zgi �m ,;�! ,�
S�aac3 ss9r 6 a b Ie� �o$ �° z6a
'gito5
b. _
'6gDS] ►J
E
8gz i 3s A
i$e8g 8 m a; 8 ao
5 °y55
IZZ
it, Zg
PIZgs`6$ s°6j3 $8 Sa60`�35a ° " -S 8 5
U _
° � eSa
4s �3�63 s���gE$E °s R a �g8 sgg �'33
BSiEs g�a gs���as8 g
-
°� 3=8s
uj
a�s66 °°
y i B ngDS�nZs u5pa5 �a� 5$=a a ^i5
J g5 z S eY IS aO� 28.98 -a gE6J$' gEE9
§ 6
�� s s � � ��5fi 5 s$•.,'a1"6' ��$g a 8$eg 19g °� 5;ad8 � g
O E A. gall 192
5�5' $i3¢ °S ^B 0
LQ Bgiss$g!_ $$eos�g a 8�8 i'g sstra
$g� SBE sm8` i6a g�• Cl - a8"
ze N E 5 °�Ei.•eg° flail E X69 i Es-3 Z5 S$` it °
as -'g „s6 =Aa3ag 5ffis 5� �ga6 a
;SU
118 ° 6 5g °_sR �5
se M�
6 5 � e g aESS ��! e�ea sass qg 3-18 a1�pb..
$58� 8$ E1SI :
$g yj
�ygsg^o_omo
E e N g 5 $M3 81i °8n828 ie •J a°
B -fi °g9E 5a°
mill HVi 3s r��
M 6'835 gW
$6,3 WWaJOO
�5 ° �E1 �E 3 � 5 <�5 •B�E 8�” Ssa �� p�t�
§ '�n 6E �5e 958 608$ ° ` 555 X�YBod " s�
gill a�t6 5- �ieE 6$ 88se s jell
y yai� o 6
i5jq s ^ a' �COjj'.1 g�8 syc4§ �Vp• s° 8 sE .; 1
W WS � �•`�V � �� Ci � S $ Y� /� •�9 �� f5���e Ml � � O��a ±a�
3 s 9 �3aS$?6 �as9b $3iai� 3g
°sss°
3--B
a t
w0 I I j = �' / y•
—J z
oQ I 3 M
a
z I I m
dz
U p.. r[ass ir►,abts - _ _ -• ; M.LS,Z4.05 )
U '�: --- - ----- Iz'6 t Yi°'. N
M„ 14,91 .ZN
(fold) 9'654 I " °aVo.
I O ''i� a e�� J ir• g `i
` 1V ��
x Iw ' � M °91,40.fLS =80
r w ° p p)�� 1� -e9,a3
O° I c uJ
�A C�
92n pp p1 u CA % R 1 M. 6 1. CO. / I RN-80
('s/
a y <CvO�'
• J
'Od9JaS;, ioF r m 4 ro r o � } --- 1 991'£6'81L6 =1 1 -
H
S,9i.0 =v •I I
J
I e
Z6LSOI -N Y'
/ I _ '
+ C) °zc,gz.9 =V till
r
PZ
W o I
v iz �� g
1 10
6b U
v M °91,9£.95
LE
n ,
e� m
_N C4
ci
U I — 3 a-
C) I �t � 5
cis
rt) �
2 F Op 1
J 4).' ba� r i 2 Cj
i
b I
o
pp h I
co
C
_m S_
r, n 2I 3
0
W101
o; tI a•,.I ta.ari . i 1 1< I I ;� -? is L— 1
a0reac rl ta•or po.�l
.eaeoee s Hl L
sY1,l aeael. mvp: ��i -+
t 1.10 •erl _`•„�� \ '•� - 'S. a.TLCI -_
CrZ5 3.41,LO.ON -
�•'1•�In ^�I.IV�I��InI nl T 'bp tares '& -oval --•�'•
2 1TS P ]rel 0/1 WIIOd ar Mle•1 � •_� �yt� ° I - Ll'Liel�
.In111/"1 /1V ^�1/�I•�IIAIV�J �` / - SYRR- 3fI,Leee-
1%y IvvlilvVV Jlvv.i. llrrvl
F 0 ,
d &se
-- uaPxr••
Q
} Y
r
F-
F_
J Z
� a
j
u�
CJ
�O
Or
e� i
H
Cz
1g�pg
j
UO.
a +
mi
U
bi
r
e
C
O
CI
I s `
.es oo a
o • .
e-
Z
i
LQ
-J C] C
-; �-
ca
` y
J'-u•amror•au�`���
.n Itn
1 ££b =� . I O_ 6 O
-.I
F') CJ
r
F-
F_
S�
C s
j
u�
CJ
1.
�
J C�
—3#V/7 HJJ V N-�
e� i
Cz
F-
,�
a +
[]
O
n]
CI
I s `
.es oo a
o • .
e-
Z
i
LQ
-J C] C
-; �-
ca
` y
J'-u•amror•au�`���
—
1;•�iv 3� "vim, ".v ivyi 7�}
A �fl L6t! � {°iga W'LiD6 114.Cf.08
p
S
y ° 00'OOZ n N s� SS
i't„•• M, LSZb.OS pn'ai ' r_� •ns� i �u'U'll: H ,I'll n �,..,S
oi•/ I t / 'rT– a
��
-!•�j
gg
9�
3a
M. Ib, ?I,ZN It-.
iJ i L
W
W
W
W
W
uj
O
Tee
$g �
C4 ww i
o�
o�
u
�oI
re) 3 a \
r
ro
�yp
S�
C s
j
rA C
—3#V/7 HJJ V N-�
e� i
a +
[]
O
C7
_7
.es oo a
o • .
e-
Z
i
Q
gg
9�
3a
M. Ib, ?I,ZN It-.
iJ i L
W
W
W
W
W
uj
O
Tee
$g �
C4 ww i
o�
o�
u
�oI
re) 3 a \
71/-7
C7 I` yE
�s I
PAS
5r
� a
98'84I =0 /
86'£b I =l 4
s zs•LSoI =a U-
r . _
M „81,£0 IBN °83
B£'88
9£ 96 l
sl•slLll =a
j• M 91,Zl, S „I S,9Z 0 =0
85'91 I 0
bs'91 I' 1
zs•LSV1 =a I
.z£,sZ 9 =v I
I
g
�^
n11a I
G � J U a
tl
U
I
s o
a co
Will
8 � O
r
ro
�yp
S�
C s
j
rA C
—3#V/7 HJJ V N-�
e� i
[]
O
C7
_7
.es oo a
o • .
e-
Z
i
Q
71/-7
C7 I` yE
�s I
PAS
5r
� a
98'84I =0 /
86'£b I =l 4
s zs•LSoI =a U-
r . _
M „81,£0 IBN °83
B£'88
9£ 96 l
sl•slLll =a
j• M 91,Zl, S „I S,9Z 0 =0
85'91 I 0
bs'91 I' 1
zs•LSV1 =a I
.z£,sZ 9 =v I
I
g
�^
n11a I
G � J U a
tl
U
I
s o
a co
Will
8 � O
ro
�yp
S�
C s
j
7,
Ti
.es oo a
o • .
Z
i
71/-7
C7 I` yE
�s I
PAS
5r
� a
98'84I =0 /
86'£b I =l 4
s zs•LSoI =a U-
r . _
M „81,£0 IBN °83
B£'88
9£ 96 l
sl•slLll =a
j• M 91,Zl, S „I S,9Z 0 =0
85'91 I 0
bs'91 I' 1
zs•LSV1 =a I
.z£,sZ 9 =v I
I
g
�^
n11a I
G � J U a
tl
U
I
s o
a co
Will
8 � O
MEMORANDUM
HOUSING
REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
DATE: November 24, 1998
TO: William Bums, Executive Director of HRA
0�
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Authorize Proposals with Larkin, Hoffman, Daly, Lindgren, Ltd,
& Benshoof & Associates
In order to provide the HRA with the appropriate assistance in reviewing the Medtronic
AUAR and ISP applications, staff is suggesting that the HRA retain Linda Fisher from
Larkin, Hoffman, Daly, Lindgren, and Jim Benshoof from Benshoof & Associates.
Larkin. Hoffman. Daly. Lindgren Proposal
Linda Fisher represented the HRA in 1996 when the HRA successfully obtained an
indirect source permit for the site. In addition, under state environmental rules, the City
of Fridley is the responsible government unit in reviewing the Alternative Urban Area -
Wide Review process (AUAR). Both the ISP and the AUAR will be occurring
simultaneously in the next 3-4 months. Ms. Fisher has been assisting staff since July
1998 when Medtronic indicated its interest in developing the site.
Ms. Fisher has estimated that her services would result in approximately $10,000-
20,000 of legal fees plus costs. (This is in addition to the $6,522 which has been
expended to date.) Staff suggests that the HRA approve the proposal up to no more
than $20,000 including all costs for Ms. Fisher. Ms. Fisher is the only attorney from the
firm who would be working on this project. At this point in time, staff anticipates that her
costs would be well below this maximum if there are no objections by other agencies to
the AUAR and ISP. If staff believes that her services will cost in excess of $20,000,
staff will bring the item back to the HRA for additional authorization.
H
Larkin, Hoffman, Daly, Lindgren, Ltd., and Benshoof & Associates Proposals
November 24, 1998
Page 2
Ms. Fisher would be responsible for reviewing the draft AUAR and ISP documents
prepared by Medtronic's consultants and attending meetings with reviewing agencies.
She would also be responsible for suggesting revisions and negotiating resolutions to
any conflicts which may arise during the process.
Ms. Fisher's experience with these issues is extremely beneficial to the HRA and the
City. Her familiarity with the site and the project has helped already in some of the
initial meetings with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Further, her knowledge of
the Environmental Quality Board rules and her experience with AUARs in other
communities will provide valuable expertise.
Benshoof & Associates
The scope of Benshoof & Associates' work for the HRA would be to review the traffic,
air quality, and noise components of the AUAR document and indirect source permit
application. The total estimated cost for the work is $6,700 (approximately $700 has
been expended to date since the Medtronic proposal). Benshoof would review the
analysis completed by Medtronic's consultant, SRF Consulting Group, Inc.
There are over $75,000 of unexpended funds in the 1998 HRA budget for professional
services. The proposed costs will also be included in the 1999 budget which is now
being prepared for HRA discussion in January.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the HRA pass a motion authorizing staff to execute the
appropriate documents /contracts with Linda Fisher of Larkin, Hoffman, Daly, Lindgren,
for an amount not to exceed $20,000; and with Benshoof & Associates for an amount
not to exceed $6,700. Any additional expenses will be reviewed by the HRA.
BD:Is
M -98-233
4 -A
FROM
JOHN A. ""
PETER J. COME
November 13,1998
11.13.1998 16:01 P. 2
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Ms. Barbara Dacy
Community Development Director
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue NE
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
1600 NORWEST FINANCIAL CENTER
7600 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH
BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 66431.1104
TELEPHONE (512) 036 -9800
FAX (612) 0064333
Re: Lake Pointe Corporate Center AUAR and ISP
Our File No. 21,733.00
Dear Barbara:
oaf
amp. OALY
0. �NfflMlll'OPAEN
ALHW i• IAI4LIDAN
AAB►N ORu
' ALlpADWRiOINNAi00NlM
a � 9iTi1WE`
"• ONLYAOMMIDINV^
You have asked us to assist the City of Fridley ("City ") in discharging its responsibilities as ROU in the
Alternative Urban Areawide Review ( "AUAR ") process for the Lake Pointe Corporate Center project
( "Lake Pointe") proposed by Medtronic. You have also asked us to assist the City and the Fridley
Housing and Redevelopment Authority ( "HRA') as first and second permittees, in an application to the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ( "MPCA ") for a new indirect source permit for Lake Pointe. This
letter confirms our representation and describes our proposed legal services.
Medtronic has asked its consultant, SRF Consulting Group, Inc. ( "SRF ") to take the lead in preparing the
AUAR environmental analysis document and mitigation plan. Before these documents are distributed to
the public and to the reviewing government agencies as required by law, they must be reviewed and
certified as to accuracy and completeness by the ROU. Ultimately, the City Council must adopt the final
revised environmental analysis document and mitigation plan before any phase of Lake Pointe Corporate
Center may be granted final approval and before site preparation work or construction may occur. This
will necessarily involve close coordination with Medtronic and SRF and other project consultants, as well
as a meticulous and thorough review of draft AUAR documents submitted to the City by the Medtronic
AUAR team.
i
FROM
Ms. Barbara Dacy
November 13,1998
Page 2
11.13. 1998 16:02 P., 3
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
As we have previously discussed, we also recommend that the City "quarterback" any future project.
related contacts with government agencies, including but not limited to, the Metropolitan Council, the
Minnesota Department of Transportation, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources, the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources, the Six Cities
WMO, and Anoka County.
To assist you in this process, we propose to attend meetings with the City and the Medtronic AUAR team
to agree on a strategy for AUAR preparation and processing; provide advice to the City, as needed to
address issues that may arise during the AUAR process; as may be directed by the City, attend meetings
with the Metropolitan Council and other government agencies as may be necessary to address project -
related issues; review the Medtronic team's draft environmental analysis document and mitigation plan
and provide comments to the City concerning suggested modifications; review written comments
submitted to the City as ROU on the draft environmental analysis document and assist the City, as may be
necessary, to revise the environmenial analysis document based on comments received during the
comment period; review the revised environmental analysis document and mitigation plan prepared by the
Medtronic AUAR team and suggest modifications; assist the City in negotiating a resolution to any
objections that may be filed by state agencies and the Metropolitan Council to the revised environmental
analysis document; as directed by the City, attend neighborhood meetings, Planning Commission or City
Council meetings concerning the AUAR process.
As you know, the MPCA has confirmed the need for the City and the HRA to obtain a new indirect source
Permit ("ISP") for Lake Pointe Corporate Center. MPCA has further agreed that review of the ISP
application may occur concurrent with MPCA review of the AUAR. This will allow for issuance of the
final ISP shortly after adoption of the AUAR environmental analysis document and mitigation plan by the
City Council.
Medtronic has asked its lead consultant, SRr Consulting Group, Inc. to prepare the technical analyses that
make up the bulk of the ISP application. However, the City and the HRA will be the first and second
permitices on the document and, as such, the City must certify the application for accuracy and
completeness. Therefore, it is essential that the City be closely involved in all stages of ISP preparation.
Much of this coordination will take place during the AUAR process, but there will necessarily be some
additional work with MPCA air quality staff to obtain a permit with conditions acceptable to all affected
parties.
To assist the City in the ISP process, we propose to perform the following legal services: attend meetings
with the City and Medtronic to reach agreement on an ISP preparation strategy; attend meetings with
MPCA staff as necessary to prepare and process the ISP; review the draft ISP application document
prepared by the Medtronic project team and provide advice to the City ooncerning suggested
modifications; as directed by the City, monitor MPCA review of the submitted ISP application, including
possible comments submitted by the public if the public comment threshold is triggered by the
application; as directed by the City, review draft ISP documents prepared by MPCA and provide advice to
4 -C
FROM
Ms. Barbara Dacy
November 13,1998
Page 3
11.13.1998 16:02 P. 4
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
the City concerning issues to discuss with the agency and Medtronic; review the proposed final ISP and,
as directed by the City, negotiate acceptable permit conditions and language.
At the onset of a project such as Lake Pointe, which involves multiple parties and an expedited schedule,
it is very difficult to estimate with ghy degree of precision the cost of the type of legal services described
in the preceding paragraphs. This is because there is considerable uncertainty as to the complexity of the
issues we will be asked to address, and the number of meetings we will be asked to attend. As we have
also discussed, the approach Medtronic's AUAR team has taken to date may have increased the likelihood
that certain issues will be closely scrutinized by government agencies, therefore requiring a greater degree
of involvement on our part to protect the City's considerable interest in the property and in the project.
With this in mind, we propose to bill you for legal services on an hourly basis. You will receive monthly
statements of our invoices during project work. At this time, we estimate that the AUAR and ISP legal
services described above will result in approximately $10,000 to $20,000 of legal fees, plus costs. This is
subject to change depending on how the AUAR and ISP processes unfold over the next several months.
This is also in addition to the statecnlent for billings and disbursements that you have already received on
this matter.
We eagerly look forward to working with you and the City on the Lake Pointe Corporate Center project.
If you have any questions concerning this letter or the project in general, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
Linda H. Fisher, for
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, Ltd.
0444293.01
4 -D
** *END * **
OCT -21 -1998 09:04 BENSHOOF & ASSOC. 612 832 9564 P. 02/W '
iFBENSHQOF & ASSOCIATES, INC.
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS ANO PLANNERS
7301 OHMS LANE, SUITE Soo / EDINA. MN 55439 / (612) 832 -9659 /FAX (612) 832.9564
October 21, 1998
Ms. Barbara Dacy
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N. E.
Fridley, MN 55432
REFER TO FILE: 98 - 59
RE: Proposal for Assistance to Review AUAR and ISP Application for Medtronic
Development on Lake Pointe Corporate Center Site
Dear Barbara:
In response to your request, this is present our proposal to assist in reviewing the AUAR
and ISP application for the proposed Medtronic development. The purpose of this review
is to ensure that the traffic, air quality, and noise portions of these documents are
consistent with the prior analyses that we performed and are consistent with the City's
current objectives. We anticipate that this work will include follow- through by our staff
and by David Braslau. We will include costs for the Braslau firm in our invoices to the
City, and the maximum cost presented in this'proposal includes costs for services provided
by the Braslau firm.
In accordance with your direction, we already have accomplished several items in
conjunction with the work scope addressed in this letter. This work consists of
participation at a meeting on October 1 with City and Medtronic representatives,
preliminary review of SRF's traffic study report for Medtronic, and discussions with
yourself. The total cost for this work to date is about $700.
In order to effectively complete our review of the traffic, air quality, and noise
components of the AUAR and ISP application, we will perform the following work tasks:
1. Confirm framework for traffic, air quality, and noise components. Based
on our prior work, we will establish draft suggestions for the current analysis
framework. We then will participate at a meeting with City stag SRF staff-, and
any other appropriate Medtronic representatives in order to confirm the
framework for the traffic, air quality, and noise analyses that will be
documented in the AUAR and the ISP application.
2. Review traffic, air quality, and noise components of the AUAR and ISP
application. We will review these documents regarding their consistency with
4 -E
OCT -21 -1998 09:05 BENSHOOF 8 ASSOC.
612 832 9564 P.03iO3
Ms. Barbara Dacy 2 October 19, 1998
our prior work, with the current framework established in task 1, and with
current City objectives. We will discuss our comments with Barbara Dacy.
3. Meet with project participants to discuss our comments from Task 2. We
will meet with City staff, SRF staff; and any other appropriate Medtronic
representatives to discuss our comments and to establish concurrence regarding
any refinements that SRF would accomplish to the AUAR and ISP application.
4. Review any refinements to the AUAR and ISP application. We will review
and updates that are provided regarding the AUAR and/or ISP application. We
then will respond to the City as to whether the documents are fully satisfactory
or whether some further adjustments are needed.
We will complete our work in an expeditious manner and are committed to fully meeting
your scheduling objectives. Labor costs will be billed on an hourly basis using the
following rates: Principal - $105.00, Sr. Professional 11-- $65.00, Sr. Professional I -
$60.00, Professional - $50.00, Technician - $50.00, and Secretary - $45.00. Direct
expenses will be billed at cost. The maximum estimated cost to complete the four tasks
previously described is .$6,000. Adding this cost to the $700 work in process, the overall
maximum total cost for the services addressed in this letter is $61700. I want to emphasize
that this work scope and cost represent a comprehensive review of the traffic, air quality,
and noise components of the AUAR and ISP application. The cost of our services would
be less if we performed a more limited review or if we did not address certain subjects.
For example, about $3,100 of the total cost is for review of the air quality and noise
components. The cost would be considerably reduced if these items were not addressed at
all or were addressed only on a cursory basis.
If any extra items are requested, the costs will be billed on an hourly basis. In any event,
we will not proceed on any extra work unless you specifically direct us to do so. We will
coordinate closely with yourself and will focus tightly on the specific issues in order to
complete our work effectively and at minimal cost. Invoices will be submitted on a
monthly basis for work performed in the prior month. Payment terms are 30 days.
If these arrangements are acceptable, please sign below and return one copy to me. We
appreciate this opportunity to work further with you in fulfilling the traffic, air quality, and
noise requirements of the proposed Medtronic development.
Sincerely,
DENS' F &ASSOCIATES, INC. CITY OF FRIDLEY
awes A. Benshoof
Name Date
4 -F
TOTAL P.03
s
DATE: November 24, 1998
MEMORANDUM
HOUSING
C. LN I t
REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
TO: William Bums, Executive Director of HRA
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Pay Increase for HRA Employees
Every year the HRA has passed a resolution authorizing a cost of living increase for
HRA employees similar to the resolution approved by the City Council for City
employees. Sara Hill, Human Resources Manager, has prepared the attached
resolution for the HRA's action for 1999. The HRA employees affected by the
resolution are the Housing Coordinator and the Remodeling Advisor. A 3% cost of
living increase is proposed.
Staff recommends that the HRA approve the resolution as presented.
BD:ls
M -98 -232
rJ
AW
ri
CITY OF
FRIDLEY '
MEMORANDUM
Sara S. Hill
Human Resources Manager
(612) 572 -3507
Memo to: Barbara J. Dacy, Director of Community Development
From: Sara S. Hill, Human Resources Manager
Subject: Resolution Authorizing Pay Increase for HRA Employees
Date: November 17, 1998
Since the HRA is a distinct entity it will be necessary for its board to authorize salary
increases for employees. I have adapted the resolution we use for the Fridley City
Council to apply to the needs of the HRA. In order to provide salary increases effective
January 1, 1999 it will be necessary for the HRA to take action on this matter at its
meeting of December 3, 1998. 1 recommend that you present this matter for action at
the above mentioned meeting. If I can be of any further assistance let me know.
SSH/jn
5 -A
RESOLUTION NO. HRA -1998
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN INCREASE IN
COMPENSATION FOR FRIDLEY HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EMPLOYEES FOR
THE 1999 CALENDAR YEAR
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority
(HRA) to provide fair and equitable compensation to Employees within budgetary
constraints; and
WHEREAS, the Fridley HRA intends to comply with the Minnesota Local Government
Pay Equity Act; and
WHEREAS, Staff of the City of Fridley have reviewed the HRA's financial position as
well as economic indicators and compensation adjustments by comparable employers;
and
WHEREAS, an adjustment of employee salaries and benefits is warranted;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment
Authority that the following adjustments be authorized for employees of the Fridley
HRA, with the exception of employees who are members of a bargaining unit, effective
January 1, 1999:
A general increase of 3.0 percent in employee salaries.
2. Mileage reimbursement at the rate of $0.325 per mile.
3. Other benefits as promulgated by the City Council for 1999.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY, OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF
1998.
� '
.e�
LAWRENCE R. COM]M ERS - CHAIRMAN
WILLIAM W. BURNS - EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
5 -B
DATE: November 24, 1998
MEMORANDUM
HOUSING
REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
TO: William Bums, Executive Director of HRA 4iry
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Extension of Time for the Execution
and Delivery of Development Contract, Noah's Ark of Minnesota
Background
On March 13, 1997, the Fridley HRA approved a resolution authorizing execution of the
development contract to provide tax increment financing assistance to Noah's Ark, Inc., for
construction of a 108 unit senior housing project. The approval was conditioned upon the
approval of a bond issuance by the City Council. Since that time, the HRA has passed two
additional resolutions authorizing an extension of the deadline to execute the contract. The
most recent extension was that the contract be executed by July 1, 1998.
Since that time, the developer put together the necessary paperwork to complete the bond
approval process by the City Council. The City Council approved the bond issuance on June 8,
1998. Another delay in the project revolved around the composition of the partners who would
provide the equity for the project.
Staff has discussed the project with Gary Bidne of Noah's Ark, and he is now confident that all
the players are now in place to make the project work.
e es
The attached resolution extends the deadline to execute the contract to July 1, 1999, and
amends the development contract to amend the completion of construction by June 20, 2000.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the HRA approve the resolution as presented.
BD:ls
M -98 -234
1�
11/23/98 MON 13:35 FAX 612 885 5969 BRASS MONROE -2 Ob2
KRASS MONROE, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
■ James R Casserly
Email jamesc@,L— arsmonraacom
Direct Dial (612) 885 -1296
MEMORANDUM
To: City of Fridley
Attn: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
From James R Casserly
Date: November 20,1998
Re: Contract for Private Redevelopment By and Between Housing and Redevelopment
Authority in and For the City of Fridley, Minnesota and Noah's Ark of Minnesota, Inc.
Our. File No. 9571 -1
The Redeveloper is again proceeding with the development of its 108 unit elderly housing project.
A number of issues are apparently resolved, the project has been re-bid and the interest rates are
advantageous.
The Resolution authorizing the Authority to execute the Agreement has expired and the attached
Resolution simply authorizes the Authority to execute the Agreement on or before July 1, 1999.
Because it has taken more time than originally anticipated, Section 4.2 of the Redevelopment
Contract needs to be amended to allow for the completion of construction by June 30, 2000.
Attached is a blacklined page showing that change.
Please let me know if you need any additional information.
JRGIrb
Enclosure
G- MMATAWRIDLEW1TAMACY JRC ZDOC
SUITE 1100 SOUTHPOINT OFFICE CENTER e 1650 WEST 82ND STREET - BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 -1447
TELEPHONE SIZW&5999 • FACSIMILE 612M.1 -5969
6 -A
11/23/98 MON 13:35 FAX 812 885 5989 BRASS MONROE
ARTICLE IV
Construction of Minimum Improvements
Section 4.1 Construction of Minimum Improvements. The
Redeveloper agrees that it will construct the Minimum
Improvements on the Redevelopment Property in accordance with the
Construction Plans approved by the City.
Section 4.2 Completion of Construction. Subject to
Unavoidable Delays, the Redeveloper shall achieve substantial
completion of the construction of the Minimum Improvements by
June 30, 2000. All work with respect to the Minimum Improvements
to be constructed or provided by the Redeveloper on the
Redevelopment Property shall be in conformity with the
Construction Plans.
The Redeveloper agrees for itself, its successors and
assigns, and every successor in interest 'to the Redevelopment
Property, or any part thereof, that the Redeveloper, and such
successors and assigns, shall diligently prosecute to completion
the development of the Redevelopment Property through the
construction of the Minimum Improvements thereon, and that such
construction shall in any event be completed within the period
specified in this Section 4.2 of this Agreement.
Section 4.3 Certificate of Completion.
(a) Promptly after substantial completion of the Minimum
Improvements in accordance with those provisions of the Agreement
relating to the obligations of the Redeveloper to construct the
Minimum Improvements (including the date for completion thereof),
the Authority will - furnish the Redeveloper with an appropriate
instrument so certifying. Such certification by the Authority
shall be (and it shall be so provided in the certification
itself) a conclusive determination of satisfaction and
termination of the agreements and covenants in the Agreement with
respect to the obligations of the Redeveloper, and its successors
and assigns, to construct the Minimum Improvements and the date
for the completion thereof.
(b) If the Authority shall refuse or fail to provide any
certification in accordance with the provisions of this Section
4.3 of this Agreement, the Authority shall, within ten (10) days
after written request by the Redeveloper, provide the Redeveloper
with a written statement, indicating in adequate detail in what
respects the Redeveloper has failed to complete the Minimum
Improvements in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement,
10
Q003
11/23/98 MON 13:35 FAX 812 885 5989 BRASS MONROE 200-4
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE
CITY OF FRIDLEY
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE EXECUTION AND
DELIVERY OF A CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY FRIDLEY AND
NOAH'S ARK OF MINNESOTA, INC.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners (the "Commissioners ") of the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Fridley, Minnesota (the "Authority ") as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The Authority has authorized on March 13, 1997, and on February 19, 1998, the
execution and delivery of a Contract For Private Redevelopment (the "Contract ") with Noah's Ark
of Minnesota, Inc. (the "Redeveloper ").
1.02. The Authority's Resolution of February 19, 1998, required that certain conditions be
met by July 1, 1998.
Section 2. Findings.
2.01. The Authority hereby finds that it has approved and adopted a development program
known as the Modified Redevelopment Plan for its Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the
"Redevelopment Program ")pursuant to Minnesota Statutes. Section 469.001 It sea.
2.02. The Authority hereby finds that the Contract promotes the objectives as outlined in
its Redevelopment Program.
2.03 The Redeveloper requires an extension of time to July 1, 1999, to secure the
financing for the project contemplated by the Contract.
Section 3. Authorization for Execution and Delivery.
3.01. The Chairman and the Executive Director of the Authority are hereby authorized to
execute and deliver the Contract if the following conditions are met by July 1, 1999:
date; and
Substantial conformance of a Contract to the Contract presented to the Authority as of this
6 -C
11/23/98 MON 13:36 FAX 612 885 5969 BRASS NONROE X1005
Page 2 -- Resolution No.
2. A final approval by the City of Fridley of a lousing revenue bond to finance the project
described in the Contract.
Adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the Authority this day of
199
ATTEST:
Executive Director
UAWPDATA\FIPRMLEY\oI%DOGIHFA RESOLUTION 3.DOC
Chairman
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE
CITY OF FRIDLEY
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE EXECUTION AND
DELIVERY OF A CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY FRIDLEY AND
NOAH'S ARK OF MINNESOTA, INC.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners (the "Commissioners ") of the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Fridley, Minnesota (the "Authority ") as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The Authority has authorized on March 13, 1997, and on February 19, 1998, the
execution and delivery of a Contract For Private Redevelopment (the "Contract ") with Noah's Ark
of Minnesota, Inc. (the "Redeveloper ").
1.02. The Authority's Resolution of February 19, 1998, required that certain conditions be
met by July 1, 1998.
Section 2. Findings.
2.01. The Authority hereby finds that it has approved and adopted a development program
known as the Modified Redevelopment Plan for its Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the
"Redevelopment Program ")pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.001 et M.
2.02. The Authority hereby finds that the Contract promotes the objectives as outlined in
its Redevelopment Program.
2.03 The Redeveloper requires an extension of time to July 1, 1999, to secure the
financing for the project contemplated by the Contract.
Section 3. Authorization for Execution and Delivery.
3.01. The Chairman and the Executive Director of the Authority are hereby authorized to
execute and deliver the Contract if the following conditions are met by July 1, 1999:
1. Substantial conformance of a Contract to the Contract presented to the Authority as of this
date; and
Page 2 -- Resolution No.
2. A final approval by the City of Fridley of a housing revenue bond to finance the project
described in the Contract.
Adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the Authority this day of
199
Chairman
ATTEST:
Executive Director
G: \WPDATA\F\FRIDLEY\01\DOC \HRA RESOLUTION 2.DOC
TO: FRIDLEY H.R.A
FROM: CITY OF FRIDLEY
RE: BILLING FOR ADMINISTRATIVE AND OPERATING EXPENSES
OCTOBER 1998
Account Vs for
HRA's Use
ADMINISTRATIVE BILLING:
Account #'s for CR
City's Use Code
ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONAL SERVICES 21,006.58 101 - 0000 - 341 -1200 H1
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD 292.58 101- 0000 - 336 -3000 HA
COMPUTER OVERHEAD 212.42 101 - 0000 - 336 -3000 HA
(For Micro & Mini computers)
TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE BILLING : 100 - 0000 - 430 - 4107 21.511.58
OPERATING EXPENSES:
USPS - POSTAGE
262- 0000 - 430 -4332
110.81
236- 0000 - 336 -3000
HA
USPS - POSTAGE
262 - 0000 -430 -4332
25.12
236 - 0000 - 336 -3000
HA
SNYDER'S -FILM PROCESSING
100 - 0000 - 430 -4221
13.82
236 - 0000 - 336 -3000
HA
USPS - POSTAGE
100- 0000 - 430 -4332
4.12
236 - 0000 - 336 -3000
HA
US WEST - TELEPHONE
100 - 0000 - 430 -4332
23.75
236- 0000 - 336 -3000
HA
USPS-POSTAGE
100 - 0000 - 430 -4332
22.36
236- 0000 - 336 -3000
HA
CITY - INS ALLOC, Sept
100 - 0000 - 430 -4336
991.00
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES: 1,190.98
BENEFITS EXPENSES:
CITY OF FRIDLEY - HEALTH INS 262 - 0000 - 219 -1001 415.24 236 - 0000 - 219 -1001 11
CITY OF FRIDLEY - DENTAL INS 262- 0000 - 219 -1100 45.06 236 - 0000 - 219 -1100 12
CITY OF FRIDLEY - LIFE INS 262 - 0000 - 219 -1200 3.50 236- 0000 - 219 -1200 13
TOTAL BENEFITS EXPENSES : 64 3.80
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
File: \EXDATA\HRA \TIF\98BILLads Details
- OCTOBER 1998
o
,
1
ep
LU Cie
1
Op��
am
;
dS
,
z
;
v
H
i
a
I
W
,
OC
,
1
I
1
�
N M
1
1
N
1
P
CD
i
S
i
O
d
1
U
C
L
W
1
1
I
1
w
,
,
I
1
ei
1p
I
W
O
1
c
1
Q.
C
2
,
W
I
0
O�
,
LUa
W
7
J
�
y
N
W
W
OC ►-
ICr
.�
Q
,
07
°z
C
Q �
1
Ol.-
1
►—
a
oe
N W
O
V
V
1
N
LU = OL
W
0
V
1
J
J dN
Y
m
N
N
�
ag
a
21
i
H
S0
OC
N
V
<
m I
V 1
ix
C
a0 ,
1
Y
41 1
Z
++
1
Q W i
m a .
W
FH F 1
IL
-C
z
W i
a•
ca
UM
M
O W W W,
,
W I
,
1
8 ,
I
,
aD
1
W 1
,
1
O
a I
O
r
CJ
N i
O
-
S
.Mt
O 1
1
-
Wi.� -.WW ,
►- i
Ct
0
N
ri
WWQ i
O
s
1�
ix
O
.m.p
2
6
WO
dG.d 1
w i
OC
t7
dd
Sso i
I... i
7 -A
ep
�O
Op��
1
v
N O
--
A
N M
P
N
It
P
CD
m
S
O
d
M
C
L
7 -A
�O
v
_C
L
yJ
C
m
d
i
C
AU
1p
c
•L
C
p
0
C
7
u
y
N
FI
9L
ICr
y
V
p
07
C
oe
O
O
V
U
J
N
N
�
v
L
a
y
C
ix
C
++
W
W
W
a
-C
z
z
i
ca
UM
c°i
W
O
O
pppp
M
O
M
O
O
v
O
O
-
S
.Mt
,
O
1
-
1
M
It
1
O
N
N
ri
„C
N
O
s
1�
��Npp
O
.m.p
M
M
v
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
PP
CD O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
6
?
N
N
N
CL
O
O
im
C5
O
O
4j
4j
N
N
N
M<
M
M
M
CM Of
N C
N OC
^
CM
C
H F
r 10
r
me 2c
1
I
'
a0
OpD�
app0,,
p00� N
app0.,
p00,
0p0�
0p0,
EpD.
u g
P
01
O. a>+
P d
P w
P
O.
P
P
<
ti
A
ti L
ti m
ti
N
N
N d
N O
a.
N d
N
N
1�
N
ti
N
ti
N
00
O
0
0
C3
ppLA
0000
=m
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
7 -A
°oi z
Ld t o
A I ¢
I
I
I
WI
A 1
a►
u►
►
x ►
z
QI
xl
I
i
I
I
I
i
1 'zJ
I a
I U
W
I A
O I
A
z N ►
Q \ I
:i .i 1
it I W m
W I x F
CL WI"
}� 0• I
.a.' t •J t
U \ t
W .+ I
U I
E !
�L OI
d IL l
1
1
i
I
1
I
I
i
I
1
i
1
1
I
1
f
1
I
zi i
xI z
006- i cc
:: w 1 a
> I z
AI >
WI
0 W I
a I
AI
zl
W ¢ I
U I
\ L3 I
ciao
`.BIN I
M O 1
.1 E0 1
LI S I
ix W I W Q
QCcJ I xA
CL 0a 1 U
W O H I
it fl ie I
a- CL W I
0o$•mom000 o16v8800" 0000o8°8NOCS S A a
Of i�. iI.� .4 ~Va MCMPVmM MvM� MN NO .iI`M
IC N .i it m C N M C4 ~
.i `0
.a
!� O a
MZ > N
I �QO CL { }W� ¢ N AiL
a 0X CL �7F in ZQWNitQJ} We
OLL 7txiH }ZJ a EQW I ~UNN >•\aLQ
.iLSN ZwHQ .fHqq ILI - WUic W Lit
z ree0WH mAQ41 W W 42HC.)L �ZQA
NHiII
zJQOi- ZWzF -WzaW& SF- UW++F -ww W
QWB,)xA z,W0001- tYtAANNzJ 4C li
OA.a W��yy,,HNWWmwWHOWNW Q WNJW>
JLJArWZW2t9HZ�33 WtAOIZ-lW lOUO
XWJHJAW 1 azJ- HAWWMZW -WOX z
Hit O)- WJrUX"w C-j cWWup�pF-- aOam }HN
WLLL. H-lJRLLhEW "Si l�t�ag@xl bO�y� A
= zUH }QlL¢xL� > }> > }UbC zgYx}
SQIHiNOOQ. I�- tf010f'tc2u¢.W3NNi¢i.(HtJAN2Ad
d 000010 0010 G10101010N1•NNNNNNN
CDMMMMCDWMWWMWMMWMMM%MM mw
�0 G �o 10 10 10 -0 -0 10 10 10 .0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 •0 10 10
N N t'J N N C•J N N N " N N " N N N N N N 03 N N N N
z it z • Lb
E 0 Xz 0 H U
> ¢ 7H f- 3JU O� F-- ZN
W O -1 U) �.6>u C0.11l0 }
Z •Z¢ZQ ZJNH�¢ .O Nit .W!
} HQW HHH WQ W LL }W A
U LL W ZUxU L6LLLAJW0W 0 > "
LY OMJLWONQ OOW ¢F J MOW
W O [t NH OCZUQH }HXUCtW
z }S HNJN } } M HH W F-3 0 y11 t. W HQOWQOQ HHW�xOAOiL>00ZZ
xWuxf W4o-QwuuxLLWUN F- L¢AzOA¢
IOiW -x0 •LLWQW •OM- FH- L0.1XQ�J.QO
Z }} E¢ O> z } }¢ O N W .J H
x WW O H N W W Z A x N 2 A N N
WNJJ�OL2I- dCNJJLHZ WHO YQWA�iJ19
z UHHQUZ W JUAH H UIY yU�W Z •N QIzHH�tap
ULLWLLi.YH9440WLOLI�iLLL.HJUJS Zfi'N JLZ
070)OlD, 0. 07m0�03IpN07Np.0)N0.040]Np.N0.
aaPAQPaPTO.a -a.0- `aaP*10. 0•a 0•
NNNNN�NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
11 \\\\\\\\\\\\\11 \\\\\\\\\
.a rl .a .a M .a .i M .i .a .a .i .a .a .4 .q .f .1 .i d .a .a .a .i
.l .i .i .i .a .a M .a .a M .a .i .i .i M .4 .l .i It .a .I .a .a .•
J*
6
O
i-
LW!
z
cc
FW-
A
TO: FRIDLEY H.R.A
FROM: CITY OF FRIDLEY
RE: BILLING FOR ADMINISTRATIVE AND OPERATING EXPENSES
NOVEMBER 1998
ADMINISTRATIVE BILLING:
ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD
COMPUTER OVERHEAD
(For Micro 8 Mini computers)
TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE BILLING
OPERATING EXPENSES:
USPS- POSTAGE
NORTH MEMORIAL - WELLNESS
USPS - POSTAGE
US WEST - TELEPHONE
CITY - INS ALLOC, Sept
BENEFITS EXPENSES:
Account #'s for
HRA's Use
Account #'s for CR
City's Use Code
21, 006.58 101- 0000 - 341 -1200 H1
292.58 101 - 0000 - 336 -3000 HA
212.42 101- 0000 - 336 -3000 HA
100 - 0000 - 430 -4107 21,511.58
262- 0000 - 430 -4332
17.31 '
236 - 0000 - 336 -3000
HA
100 - 0000 - 430 -4330
65.00
236- 0000 - 336 -3000
HA
100 - 0000 - 430 -4332
7.35
236 - 0000 - 336 -3000
HA
100 - 0000 - 430 -4332
23.73
236- 0000 - 336 -3000
HA
100 - 0000 - 430 -4336
991.00
236 - 0000 - 336 -3000
HA
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES:
CITY OF FRIDLEY - HEALTH INS 262- 0000 - 219 -1001
CITY OF FRIDLEY - DENTAL INS 262- 0000 - 219 -1100
CITY OF FRIDLEY - LIFE INS 262 - 0000 - 219 -1200
104 39
207.62 236 - 0000 - 219 -1001 11
22.53 236- 0000 - 219 -1100 12
3.50 236- 0000 - 219 -1200 13
TOTAL BENEFITS EXPENSES: 233.65
TOTAL EXPENDITURES -
File: \EXDATA\HRA \TIF\988lLL.xis Details
7C
NOVEMBER 1998
r r
r
r
r
r
r
1
r
r
1
r
1
W of
r
r
r
r
LU
d =
Z
1
1
1
1
1
1
r
r
r
r
Wr
1
Im
r
r
r
r
r
r
1
1
2 1
Y01
ti
O
CyO�
O
C7
Mq
N
O
P
M
r
1
ONi
N
O
M
1n
r`
N
00
NA
a0
r-
1
1
r
d 1
N
fi
M
r
1
r
W 1
r
r
LU
W r
r
p[ 1
1
r
r
r
r
r
I
r
1
I
H 1
r
r
Li 1
W r
r
r
� 1
O 1
1
1
ad 1
d r
r
r
Z
i
C
W
1
r
co
N
•L
rCi
GGG
o
O
°'
r
g'
c
O
•`
W J
i
i
S
C
x
O
d
C
O
1
r
O
i+
O
S
M
U
M
U
d
N
1
C
r
C
oG /-
r
r 1
If1
d
rc
Y1
O
O
O p
r
r
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
J
J
J
Z
Z
J
U
U
J
1
r
i
O
Y
Y
O
41
41
IOZ..~d.
adze
O
O
N W
r
U r
a
O
O
w
r
r
1
L
L
V
S OC
r
r
to r
LU
p i
N
K
OC
S
N
LL
V V
LL
N
d
u
O
O
N
Y x
r
r
r
r
W N
r
pc r
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
J 5
r
W 1
O
O
O
O
O
O
I
O
O
p U
r
m r
r
r
°O
1
r
r
r
r
r In
W
"a ;
rn
rn
o
s
o
• r
u i
r
2 i
N
M
I,
.Np
M
. Np
M
r-
N
M
O
M
N
C
.Np
M
m r
d'
r
r
r
•
•
r
r
r
r
1
r
/
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N P�
L 1
N 1
V 1
t r
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Cl
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
J 1
t
l0
u 1
r
.-
N
N
N
N
N
P
1
P
H
O
1
r
O
rn
in
o
.o
.o
•o
M
In
r
In
S
S
N
N
N
N
P r
Y r
P
GC
O
C
~,
M
O
b\
Oe-JJ J 1
W
U r
C
•O
C�
O r W W W r
r
W 1
�C 1
W
�
• • •• •• r
r
�?
N
N
IT
N
.?
N O
It
N
.t
N
%*
N
It
N
%t
N
F-
P"
I
� I
I
1
r
r
•-
P'• -7
1
w
co
� g�
d 1
q( r
N
r
1
(J Y 1
p
1
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\ O
o
m m r
N r
1n
In
N
In •�
n
In M
N�•-
.Z+ r
KF-000 r
Z� r
a.-. r
N
\
N
\
N
\
N 4+
\l0
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
N
\
•U
�$$
of W C i
u W
w 1
C4 gm
" O =Z
ou
G
d
W
a
O
O
O
O
O
OOC7CC
W
a
O
O
O
O
O d
O
O
O
O
O
7D
MEMORANDUM
HOUSING
REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
DATE: November 25, 1998 1
TO: William W. Bums, Executive Director of HRA /4
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Grant Femelius, Housing Coordinator
SUBJECT: Update on Housing Program Evaluation Internship Project
This is to update you on the progress of Ben Martig, CURA intern, who has been
working on an evaluation of the HRA's housing program.
I �_ M_ .. .�
The primary objective of the study is to analyze the impact of the HRA's housing rehab
programs and their effectiveness on improving the City's housing stock and
neighborhoods. Among the issues to be explored:
1. Who is utilizing the program and what is the demographic profile of the typical
recipient?
2. Should the eligibility requirements (e.g. income limits, type of improvements, loan
amount, etc.) be adjusted to focus the HRA's resources on specific populations or
neighborhoods?
3. What is the impact of the HRA's programs in such areas as housing values and
resident's perceptions of their homes and neighborhoods.
4. How does Fridley compare to other communities trying to address similar housing
issues?
W..-
Since he began in mid - September, Ben has accomplished the following activities:
r•�
Housing Program Evaluation Memo
November 25, 1998
Page 2
1. Assembled a master database of all residential property owners who have received
HRA rehab assistance since 1993. This information will also be used by the GIS
staff to prepare maps and help with overlay analysis.
2. Met with the City Assessor's office to identify:
a. The "before" and "after" valuations of the properties which have been
improved through the program.
b. What type of improvements typically add value (e.g. improve marketability)
and those that do not (e.g. improve livability and safety).
C. The number of residents who have utilized the "This Old House" special
property tax deferment program.
3. Collected data from the Building Inspections staff on residential remodeling permits
since 1993 to compare public and private investment levels.
4. Met with several suburban communities to determine what type of programs are
available.
5. Identified and reviewed studies which have been done in Minneapolis and St. Paul
on housing program effectiveness and methodology.
Future Activities
In December, we will conduct a survey of loan and grant recipients who have been
assisted through the HRA's programs. In addition, we plan to conduct a focus group
meeting with a random sample of this group in early January. We will also conduct a
more in -depth survey and evaluation of our efforts in Hyde Park.
No action is needed by the HRA at this time. The goal is complete the survey work,
focus group studies, data analysis and prepare a written report in January 1999. The
final product with recommendations would be brought to the HRA in February 1999.
M -98 -231
DATE: November 24, 1998
MEMORANDUM
HOUSING
REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
TO: William Bums, Executive Director of HRAa'
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Medtronic Update
A draft development contract was forwarded to Medtronic on October 28, 1998.
Medtronic will return their comments to Jim Casserly and myself on December 1, 1998.
A meeting to resolve the issues will likely be set during the week of December 7, 1 998.
In the meantime, staff and Linda Fisher have attended meetings with the MPCA and the
Metropolitan Council regarding the AUAR and ISP applications. The draft AUAR and
ISP will be submitted to staff by mid - December for distribution to the required review
agencies. The public comment period on the applications will occur during the month of
January. Council action on the AUAR will occur some time in March, assuming there
are no objections. In the meantime, Medtronic should be filing their land use
applications by the end of the year.
No action is needed by the HRA at this time, but the January and February agendas will
likely have action items for HRA consideration.
BD:ls
M -98 -235
I1
11/19/98 THU 17:11 FAX 612 885 5969
KRASS MONROE, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
■ James R cassaiy
EmaAjame=@bassm0nroe.e0m
www- lwessmonmacom
Dimd Mal (612) 685-9296
ME
To: City of Fridley
Attn: Barbara Dacy, Community
Attn: William Burns, Assistant C
From: James R Casserly, Esq.
Date: November 19, 1998
Re: Update on Medtronic Development
Our File No. 9571 -20
S MONROE Z002
RANDUM
Director
On Thursday afternoon, November 19, 98, Cindy Amdt, Legal Counsel for Medtronic,
provided me with the following infomiatio
I. She, Donn Hagman, Peter Ki c k and John Herman met for four hours
Thursday morning to review t ic Development Agreement. Unfortunately,
they did not complete their a Aew, but they will meet again prior to
Thanksgiving to finish their worzon the Agreement.
2. John Herman has been asked b-
their comments and incorporate
comments will be blacklined.
I Cindy suggested that the Cit
Rod Krass and 1) then review
technical and what comments
4. We should be receiving the
1998.
5. Assuming that we can revie,
substantive issues by the end of
Medtronic working group to take all of
into our October 28, 1998, draft. Their
representatives (presently Barbara Dacy,
ments to determine what we can adopt as
wire further discussion.
commments no later than December 1,
heir comments and determine what are
first week of December, then we should be
SURE 1100 SOUTHPOINT OFFICE CENTER • 1650 WEST 8 jh o STREET • BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 -1447
TELEPHONE 612/88x. 99 . FACSIMILE 612188 S69
9 -A
011/19/98 THU 17:11 FAX 612 885 5969 KRASS MONROE
able to have a meeting with the seven of us the week of December 7. 1
attempted to commit Cindy to a specific date so that we could set it aside, but
she thought it more prudent that we see their comments first so that we could
determine how much time it would take for us to respond.
6. Cindy once again repeated that this is a priority item for Medtronic and that she
is to take the time that is needed to get the job done.
Needless to say, we are prepared to commit the necessary time. We will forward their comments
Just as soon as we have received them.
JRC1lrb
cc: Krass Monroe, P.A.
Attn: Rod Krass
G.AMATAWRIDLEY12XCR1DACY BURNS 2 =
• Page 2
Z 0o3
MEMORANDUM
HOUSING
REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
DATE: November 24, 1998
TO: William Bums, Executive Director of HRA��
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Request for TIF Assistance by Onan & Murphy Warehouse
Background
Murphy Warehouse is proposing to construct a 400,000 square foot state -of -the -art
supplier warehouse and distribution facility in the south central portion of the Onan
campus. Onan and Murphy Warehouse have filed the required plat application for
Planning Commission and Council review in December and January. The 26 acre
portion of the Onan site affected by this development will require significant soil
correction and public improvements.
Onan currently leases space from Murphy Warehouse at its warehouse on Main Street.
Onan's lease expires at the end of 1999. Onan intends to sell 26 acres to Murphy
Warehouse for the warehouse construction and then lease up to 60% of the building.
Locating the warehouse facility on the Onan site will provide Onan with a significant
operational advantage since component part suppliers will be on site, and warehouse
space will be relocated from the existing plant. A rail spur will also serve the Onan
campus and will actually go through the building.
Requesl
The total cost is estimated at $13,586,015. Onan has retained Real Estate Recycling,
Inc., to prepare and file grant applications to DTED and Metropolitan Council for
pollution clean -up funds. About $956,000 was requested (the City Council agreed to
act as the "sponsor" of the applications similar to what the HRA did for Dealers
Manufacturing). Murphy Warehouse is requesting approximately $1,290,000 in tax
increment financing for a variety of soil correction and public improvements (see
attached description labeled `TIF Extraordinary Costs ").
10
Request for TIF Assistance by Onan & Murphy Warehouse
November 24, 1998
Page 2
The amount of assistance requested is about 10% of the project cost. A preliminary
TIF cash flow analysis is attached. By 2006, a present value of $1,041,000 of tax
increment can be generated which equates to $1,526,000 of available tax increment.
Although staff is still reviewing the proposed use of the TIF funds and the requested
amount, a pay -as- you -go approach has been suggested to Onan and Murphy
Warehouse. Another option may need to be explored due to hte nature of these costs
and the outcome of the grant applications.
Environmental Contamination History
The Boise Cascade Corporation was placed under court order in 1980 to complete a
remedial action plan to construct a slurry wall containment system at the southwest
portion of the site, test and abandon a contaminated deep well, and conduct long term
monitoring of ground water and treatment contingencies. The clean -up was required as
a result of the pollution remaining from creosote treatment of telephone poles in the
early part of this century. A vault system is now in place, and the poor soils from the
creosote treatment area are now contained within the vault. A drain system was
constructed in the area of the proposed warehouse construction to filter any ground
water contamination from any remaining contaminated soils.
Boise Cascade has completed its responsibilities under the 1980 court order, and the
site has been de- listed from the National Priorities' List. Despite the work completed to
date, there still remains significant geotechnical issues associated with the excavation
and filling of the former areas which contained heavy soil contamination. These areas
are the proposed site for the warehouse construction.
The soils in the area of the french drain which was constructed on the site are
inadequate for proper compaction and will have to be excavated and recompacted.
Secondly, the developer is proposing to construct a wetland on site to handle the storm
water run -off and treat any impacted ground water through natural plant life in the
wetland area.
Finally, because the vault is located between the proposed site and Central Avenue,
utilities and public improvements need to serve the site from a significant distance and
in. unusual locations. For example, the sewer service will have to be accessed by
jacking underneath the railroad line to the south of the property. The water service will
have to be extended an additional amount of distance from Central Avenue. The
building elevation will have to be raised for proper grading and storm water
management.
10 -A
Request for TIF Assistance by Onan & Murphy Warehouse
November 24, 1998
Page 3
The developer points out that the site has suffered because of a "stigma" of a Super
Fund site. In order to achieve development on the property, the developer is
suggesting that these issues will need to be resolved if additional development is to
occur. The City Assessor's Office has placed a zero value on the land for this property;
however, once corrected, the property taxes to be collected on an annual basis will
approximate $552,850.
Although staff is still reviewing the proposed financial package with the developer
(project proformas, purchase agreement, and lending commitments still need to
finalized), the proposed project offers several advantages to the HRA and the City. The
first advantage to the HRA is that it is a significant project in Tax Increment Financing
District No. 9 which is not producing increment at this time. Increment would be
available to help reduce the cost of redevelopment of the salvage yards (possibly up to
$1 million). The advantages to the City include 100 additional jobs as a result of the
development, reduced truck traffic on City roads as a result of Onan's consolidation of
facilities, and, more importantly, development of what was once an unusable piece of
property into a tax producing parcel.
Summary
No action is needed by the HRA at this time. Staff will continue to negotiate with Onan
and Murphy Warehouse.
BD:Is
M -98 -236
=-I
1
i
1
-
N
�Yt
t•
X.
jY1W1`'
`r
J� �r
Fy�a
�j
SSSSSS
yr F'�'�
i'� y�q� a� � +. Nrt� c�7t53' �,F_'r• z
f 1!
o
a
m
x`�N
a
A T
r� 4
1
i
1
-
1 �
�Yt
t•
X.
jY1W1`'
`r
J� �r
Fy�a
.ry� vSa -
i fit 3 —A KP
`
yr F'�'�
i'� y�q� a� � +. Nrt� c�7t53' �,F_'r• z
f 1!
Ott
1
G7
Q
alug! -m g r Iyi1LYn✓ ? •R.i ! 4S g r
a, "k
r*t+,i�� Y�"r��v �' '�ryqq�s A a� � rk 'e 4^,k4'• }Cy1,fG4. -
'�r. CfP��bMi �
-
�Yt
t•
jY1W1`'
`r
J� �r
Fy�a
.ry� vSa -
i
Epns, r �
a
A T
r� 4
E tFc4� a�L
r
� r•.
4
F
� I
G7
Q
alug! -m g r Iyi1LYn✓ ? •R.i ! 4S g r
a, "k
r*t+,i�� Y�"r��v �' '�ryqq�s A a� � rk 'e 4^,k4'• }Cy1,fG4. -
-
jY1W1`'
`r
J� �r
Fy�a
.ry� vSa -
i
Epns, r �
m
r� 4
4
F
-
a >�
W
`YS4
Rt „JA...t Pi P iS'r igeY 4°p ,r
SAD'. r.O -]:r - 1r:.•9UZ� �.+:•i
6
_ 11/19/1998
U
0
A
O
o.
r
14 :53 612 - 337 -9060
REAL ESTATE RECYCLIN
O
e
o
o
$
°o
0
0
0
�
O
a-
vl
lz
Vi
I'D
O
en
��
e
>
G
.G
3 U
¢
U
a
a
o
o
.fl
to
a
o
b
�i
O
y
tiD • _,
cr
.0
a0.
G
on
CL
V
a4
w
Of
rz
a
ca o
a
o
�
O
C%1
�y
C%1
c�
h
.m
d,
D
y
O
O
o
o
$
°o
0
0
0
�
O
W
vl
lz
Vi
I'D
O
en
��
e
G
fie
all
0 y 0
O
:, vi C51 U
y
ca
Q
10 -D
W
O
An
A
00
c
a
J
m
.y
H
0
ao
-�a
m
our-
O N M
N00
In a
6^9 5~A
P
s�
C9vo
0 0
.o U
x
a
PAGE 02
.o
R
b
0
O
O
O
N
V
s
0
.�k
O
V
s
b
a
b
CIO.
0
U
.�Uj
11/19/1998 14:53 612 - 337 -9060 REAL ESTATE RECYCLIN
Project Budget for Onan / Murphy Distribution Center
Fridley, NN
1. Cleanup Budget
A. Site Investigation & Remediation Development
Pre - Construction Site Investigation $78,000
Groundwater Modeling $7,000
Work Plan $11,000
Remedial Action Plan $15,500
Total Site Invstgn, RAJ' Dvlpmut $111,500
A RAP Implementation: Cleanup Costs
Soil impacts
$249,575
(Excavation, Stockpiling, Sampling,
Treatment, Backf:ll, Compaction)
Groundwater
$177,375
(Dewatering, Constructed Wetland, Well
Abandonment)
City Oversight
$5,000
Documentation / Implementation Report
$12,500
MPCA Oversight
$30,000
Total Implementation:
5474,450
Contingency:
$117,190
Total TBRA and DTED Cleanup Budget
5703,140
11. Development / Redevelopment Budget
Soil Correction, Dewatering (DIED P Cost)
$65,000
Soil Correction (French Drain) (DIED P Cost)
$155,000
Infrastructure
$915,000
Roadways
$207,500
Contingency - Infrastructure 15%
$168,375
Construction 406,164 SF Building
$11,372,000
Total Development Budget
$12,882,875
DTED Eligible Project Costs $956,140
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET $13,586,015
. Proposed Cost Allocation from Public Sources
DIED (75% P Costs) $717,105
City $84,377
Met Council $154,658
Total Grant Funding: $956,140
Tax Increment Financing: $1,290,875
Private Investment: $11,456,377
10 -E
n -
PAGE 03
% of Total Project Costs
5.3%
0.6%
1.1%
7.0 %•
95%
84.3%
R
-11/24/98 TUE 14:35 FAX 612 885 5969 BRASS MONROE R002
KRASS MONROE, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
■ James R Casserly
EmaBjamesc@kmswnvnm .cam
www.krammonroe.eom
Deed D161 (612) 885 -1296
MEMORANDUM
To: City of Fridley
Attn: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Real Estate Recycling
Attn: Paul M. Hyde, Chief Executive Officer
From: James R Casserly, Esq.
Greg D. Johnson, CPA
Date. November 24,1998
Re: Assistance for the Onan/Murphy Project
Our File No. 9571 -10
Attached you will find the following schedules labeled Assumptions, Cash Flow and Present
Value Analysis, Sources and Uses and Tax Increment Revenue Note.
On the Assumptions please note that we are showing the market value for the land of $1.25 per
square foot and the market value for the building of $23.50 per square foot for a combined market
value of $27.00 per square foot of building. We think these are reasonable assumptions. Please
review and comment.
The Cash Flow and Present Value Analysis shows the amount of increment that is potentially
available throughout the remaining life of the tax increment district. When talc increment district
number 9 was established, it was assumed there would be substantial amounts of increment to
help with the redevelopment of various sites within the district particularly the recycling
businesses (junk yards). We have drawn a line after 12/01/06 since that is the amount of
increment we are proposing be made available for the project. This assumes that the project pro
formas can demonstrate a need for this level of increment and it also assumes that the grants
needed for pollution abatement will be provided.
SURE 1100 SOUTHPOINT OFFICE CENTER • 1650 WEST 82ND STREET • BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431.1447
TELEPHONE 6121885-5999 • FACSIPALE 612 &5969
1 n -F
11/24/98 TUE 14:35 FAX 612 885 5969 BRASS MONROE QQ63
The Sources and Uses need little explanation. Under Sources we are assuming that the land is
actually worth $1.25 per square foot even though the land acquisition costs, as shown under the
Uses, is only $1.00 per square foot Also note that the contingency amount in the Uses exceed
$300,000.00.
The Tax Increment Revenue Note is an amortization which uses the available tax increment (see
columns G and H in the Cash Flow and Present Value Analysis) to amortize a note whose
principal is $1,041,501.00. The cumulative payments of the revenue note equal the cumulative
available tax increment The note would bear interest at 7.5% and would be for a term of
approximately eight years with twelve semi - annual payments.
We are hopeful that a revenue note or pay as you go approach will work. This approach has
worked on most of our projects and because of the short duration of this note, that is only eight
years, it should be very acceptable to the lending community.
Please consider these schedules as preliminary. We still need to review the project pro formal,
the purchase agreement between Onan and Murphy and lending commitments. We look forward
to hearing from you.
JRC/lrb
Enclosures
GAWPDATAPFRIDLEY1 OCOR1DACY HYDE .DOC
0 fte 2
10 -G
11/24/98 TUE 14:35 FAX 612 885 5969 KRASS MONROE R004
CITY OF FRIDLEY
T.I.D. #9 - ONAN
ASSUMPTIONS
Original Market Value
PIN# 12-41 -0002
1,132,560
sq. ft.
@
1.25 /sq. ft.
= 1,415,700
Original Tax Capacity
3.50%
49,550
Estimated Market Value
10,960,554
Land
1,132,560
sq. ft.
@
1.25 /sq. ft.
= 1,415,700
Building
406,164
sq. ft.
@
23.50 /sq. ft.
= 9,544,854
Estimated Tax Capacity
3.50%
383,619
Estimated Taxes
406,164
sq. ft.
@
1.24 /sq. ft.
= 505,019
Construction
1999
Valuation
2000
Taxes Payable
2001
Admin /Program Fees 25.00%
Pay 1989 Tax Rate certified tax rate * 0.97756
Pay 1999 Tax Rate - estimate 1.31646
Inflation 2002/2003 2.00%
P. V. Rate 12/01/98 7.50%
10 -H
,:)nan.WK4 PREPARED BY KRASS MONROE, P.A.
11/23/98
11/24/98 TUE 14:36 FAX 612 885 5969 BRASS MONROE j0d5
CITY OF FRIDLEY
T.I.D. #9 - ONAN
CASH FLOW AND PRESENT VALUE ANALYSIS
<- -
ANNUAL
-->
< -
0
__ SEMI - ANNUAL
0
0
(a) (b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(9)
(h)
0
0
Original
Estimated
Captured
Estimated
Less:
Available
Cumulative
. --- Present Value - - ->
Tax
Tax
Tax
Tax
Admin
Tax
Avail. Tax
Semi Annual
Cumulative
Date Capacity
Capacity
Capacity
Increment
Fees
Increment
Increment
Balance
Balance
(see assumptions)
(c) - (b)
(d) x
(e) x
(e) - (f)
Total of (g)
P.V. of (g)
Total of (1)
49,550
363,619
(prev. year)
0.97756
25.00%
0
0
7.50%
0
06/01/98
49,550
49,550
373,997
0
0
0
0
0
0
12/01198
49,550
49,550
382,468
0
0
0
0
0
0
06/01/99
49,550
49,550
382,468
0
0
0
0
0
0
12101/99
49,550
49,550
391,109
0
0
0
0
0
0
06/01/00
49,550
383,619
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12/01/00
49,550
363,619
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
06/01/01
49,550
383,619
334,070
163,287
40,822
122,465
122,465
101,876
101,876
12/01/01
49,550
383,619
334,070
163,287
40,822
122,465
244,930
98,194
200,070
06101/02
49,550
391,292
334,070
163,287
40,822
122,465
367,395
94,644
294,714
12/01/02
49,550
391,292
334,070
163,287
40,822
122,465
489,860
91,224
385,938
06/01/03
49,550
399,118
341,742
167,037
41,759
125,278
615,138
89,946
475,883
12/01/03
49,550
399,118
341,742
167,037
41,759
125,278
740,415
86,695
562,578
06101/04
49,550
407,100
349,568
170,862
42,715
128,146
868,562
85,475
648,053
12/01/04
49,550
407,100
349,568
170,862
42,715
128,146
996,708
82,385
730,438
06/01/05
49,550
415,242
357,550
174,764
43,691
131,073
1,127,781
81,221
811,659
12/01/05
49,550
415,242
357,550
174,764
43,691
131,073
1,258,853
78,285
889,944
06/01/06
49,550
423,547
365,692
178,743
44,686
134,057
1,392,911
77;174
967,117
12101/08
49;550
423,547
365,692
178,743
44,686
134,057
1.526.988
74.384
1_041_sni
12/01/07
49,550
432,018
373,997
182,802
.-I ---
45,701
.vr,.v�
137,102
,,vVT,VrV
1,801,172
rJ,JLY
70,674
1,119,OL.i
1,185,499
06/01/08
49,550
440,658
382,468
186,943
46,736
140,207
1,941,379
69,662
1,255,161
12101/08
49,550
440,658
382,468
186,943
46,736
140,207
2,081,586
67,144
1,322,305
06/01/09
49,550
449,471
391,109
191,166
47,792
143,375
2,224,960
66,179
1,388,484
12/01/09
49,550
449,471
391,109
191,166
47,792
143,375
2,368,335
63,787
1,452,272
06/01/10
49,550
458,461
399,922
195,474
48,868
146,605
2,514,940
62,867
1,515,139
12/01/10
49,550
458,461
399,922
195,474
48,868
146,605
2,661,546
60,595
1,575,733
06101/11
49,550
467,630
408,911
199,868
49,967
149,901
2,811,446
59,717
1,635,451
12/01/11
49,550
467,630
408,911
199,868
49,967
149,901
2,961,347
57,559
1,693,010
06/01/12
49,550
476,982
418,080
204,349
51,087
153,262
3,114,609
56,723
1,749,732
12/01/12
49,550
476,982
418,080
204,349
51,087
153,262
3,267,871
54,672
1,804,405
06/01/13
49,550
486,522
427,433
208,921
52,230
156,691
3,424,562
53,875
1,858,280
12/01/13
06/01/14
49,550
49,550
486,522
496,253
427,433
436,973
208,921
213,583
52,230
53,396
156,691
160,188
3,581,252
51,928
1,910,207
12/01/14
49,550
496,253
436,973
213,583
53,396
160,188
3,741,440
3,901,627
51,168
49,318
1,961,375
2,010,694
06/01/15
49,550
506,178
446,703
218,340
54,585
163,755
4,065,382
48,594
2,059,288
12/01/15
49,550
506,178
446,703
218,340
54,585
163,755
4,229,137
46,838
2,106,126
5,638,849 1,409,712 4,229137 4,229,137 2,106,126 2,106,126
10 -1
Onen.WK4 PREPARED BY KRASS MONROE, PA. 11/23/98
P ![
11/24/98 _TUE 14:36 FAX 612 885 5969 BRASS MONROE
CITY OF FRIDLEY
T.I.D. 99 - ONAN
SOURCES AND USES
SOURCES
Tax Increment Present Value
DTED (75% of Cleanup & Soil Correction Costs) $956,140
City (Share of Cleanup & Soil Correction Costs)
Met Council (Share of Cleanup & Soil Correction Costs)
Land Payment 1,132,560 sq. ft. @
TOTAL SOURCES
@ 75.00% _
1.25 /sq. ft. _
USES
Land Acquisition 1,132,560 sq. ft. @ 1.00 /sq. ft.
Cleanup costs (DTED P Cost)
Site Investigation & Remediation Development
111,500
RAP Implementation - Cleanup Costs
474,450
Contingency 20.00%
117,190
Soil Correction, Dewatering (DTED P Cost)
Dewatering
65,000
French Drain
155,000
Contingency 15.00%
33,000
Infrastructure
Roadway access
207,500
Grading
265,000
Stormwater Treatment / Constructed Wetland
475,000
Sanitary Sewer
30,000
Water
75,000
Debris on Site
30,000
Propane Tank Explosion Berm
40,000
Contingency 15.00%
168,375
Professional Fees
TOTAL USES
SURPLUS / (DEFICIT)
10 -J
Onan.WK4 PREPARED BY KRASS MONROE, P.A.
8006
1,041,501
717,105
84,377
154,658
1,415,700
3,413,341
. 1,132,560
703,140
253,000
1,290,875
25,000
3,404,575
8,766
11/23/98
11/24/98 TUE 14:36 FAX 612 885 5969 KRASS MONROE
Principal Amount
Interest Rate
Number of Payments
Payment Amount
Interest Start Date
Term of Note
CITY OF FRIDLEY
T.I.D. #9 - ONAN
TAX INCREMENT REVENUE NOTE
1,041,501
7.50%
12 semi - annual payments
Available Tax Increment
12/01/98
8 years
Capitalized
Date Interest Payment Interest Principal Balance
12/01/98
1,041,501
06/01/99
39,056
0
0
1,080,558
12/01/99
40,521
0
0
1,121,079
06/01/00
42,040
0
0
1,163,119
12/01 /00
43,617
0
0
1,206,736
06/01/01
0
122,465
45,253
77,212
1,129,524
12/01/01
0
122,465
42,357
80,108
1,049,416
06/01/02
0
122,465
39,353
83,112
966,304
12/01/02
0
122,465
36,236
86,229
880,075
06/01/03
0
125,278
33,003
92,275
787,801
12/01/03
0
125,278
29,543
95,735
692,065
06/01/04
0
128,146
25,952
102,194
589,871
12/01/04
0
128,146
22,120
106,026
483,845
06/01105
0
131,073
18,144
112,928
370,917
12/01/05
0
131,073
13,909
117,163
253,754
06/01/06
0
134,057
9,516
124,542
129,212
12/01/06
0
134,057
4,845
129,212
(0)
1651235
1,526,968
320,232 _
1,206,736
10 -K
'R607
Onan.WK4 PREPARED BY KRASS MONROE, P.A. 11/23/98
Fridley HRA
Monthly Housing Program Summary
December 3, 1998
1. Loan Origination Report
Covers the loans and grants issued in 1998, through 11- 23 -98. This
report shows activity both city -wide and in the Hyde Park neighborhood.
2. Loan Servicing Report
Covers HRA funded loans only. Report summarizes all of the loans being
serviced by the Community Reinvestment Fund (CRF) for the most recent
reporting period, 10- 31 -98.
3. Delinquent Loan Report
Report shows the number of loans that are considered delinquent. There
are four categories (1 month, 1 -2 months, 2 -3 months, over 3 months).
The report shows the total amount of delinquent payments. Report covers
activity through 10- 31 -98.
4. Other Information
None
Monthly Housing Report Cover (12 -3-98 HRA)
s,
LOAN ORIGINATION REPORT
Month Ending
Nov -88
City VYlde Loans and Gra
1988 (NOV) LOAN ACMAT Y REPORT
I.O.R. - NOV 1899
112488
IName
(Address
I
I
HOM
I
I
Loses Unt
Loma Unt
Grande/ UM
Total Unt1
Closed
Property
Program
1 Retneck 143-Horizon Circle S 23,978.98 1 $ - $ - S 23,978.98 1 127/98 Single-family 5% Loan
2 Flan 6558 Oakley SL $ 8,800.00 1 $ - $ - $ 8,800.00 1 3/17/98 Single- family 5% Loan
3 Mahoney 261 -87th Ave. NE $ - $ - $ 13,383.00 1 $ 13,383.00 1 319/98 Single -family CDBG Grant
4 Ecker 6380 Startle Blvd. $ - $ - $ 9,621.00 1 $ 9,621.00 1 1/16198 Single- family CDBG Grant
5 Marciniak 801 - 58th Ave. NE S - $ $ 15,040.00 1 $ 15,040.00 1 3/28/98 Single -family CDBG Grant
6 Harlander 136 - River Edge Way S 25,000.00 1 $ - $ _ $ 25,000.00 1 421/98 Single -family 5% Loan
7 Van Auken 1475 - 73rd Ave. NE S 6,000.00 1 $ - $ - $ 6,000.00 1 423198 Single -family 5% Loan
8 Marcmiak 617 - Hugo SL NE S 4,922.86 1 $ - $ - $ 4,922.86 1 5/5198 Single - family 5% Loan
9 Hinrichs 7355 Hayes SL NE S 3,900.00 1 $ - $ - S 3,900.00 1 5/5198 Single -family 5% Loan
10 DMkes 680 - Ironton SL NE $ 2,400.00 1 $ - $ - $ 2.400.00 1 51501 Single-family 5% Loan
11 Dougherty 7420 Concerto Curve $ 18,118.19 1 $ - $ - $ 16,118.19 1 5/12/98 Single - family 5% Loan
12 Bailey 1828 Gardena Ave. NE $ 9,900.00 1 $ $ - $ 9,900.00 1 5/19/98 Single-family 5% Loan
13 Nelson 7530 Tempo Tarr. S 13,355.25 1 $ - $ - $ 13,35525 1 5/19/98 Single -family 5% Loan
14 Zelenak 7526 - 4th St NE S 7,500.00 1 $ $ $ 7,500.00 1 5/19M Single -family 5% Loan
15 Kok 6517 McKinley SL NE S 23,077.00 1 $ - $ - $ 23,077.00 1 5119/98 Single -family 5% Loan
16 Miter 591 - Dover SL NE S 25,000.00 1 $ - $ - $ 25,000.69 1 528198 Single-family 5% Loan
17 Smith 4610 2 -12 SL NE S 12,400.00 1 $ - $ - S 12,400.00 1 62/98 Single-family 5% Loan
18 Gunta 117 -Alden Circe $ 25,000.00 1 $ - $ - $ 25,000.00 1 6098 Single - family 5% Loan
19 Cannon 6750 Monroe SL NE $ 23,287.73 1 $ - $ - _ $ 23,287.73 1 819198 Single-family 5% Loan
20 Borman 120 River Edge Way $ 23,923.94 1 $ - $ - $ 23,923.94 1 619198 Single -family 5% Loan
21 Maki 7341 Concerto Curve S 3,775.00 1 $ - $ - $ 3,775.00 1 6130/98 Single family 5% Loan
22 Harfl 1311 - Creek Park Ln. S 20,000.00 1 $ - $ - $ 20,000.00 1 6/30/98 Single family 5% Loan
23 Leslie 600 - Hugo SL $ 24,425.00 1 $ - $ - S 24,425.00 1 721/98 Single family 5% Loan
24 Peterson 6757 Washington SL S 10,000.00 1 $ - $ - $ 10,000.00 1 721MB Single family 5% Loan
25 Nelson 250 - Gist Ave. $ 22,940.12 1 $ - $ - $ 22,940.12 1 721/98 Single family 5% Loan
26 Klein 5974 - 4th SL S 23,270.00 1 $ - $ - $ 23,270.00 1 7/30/98 Single family 5% Loan
27 Jacob 6251 Rainbow Dr. $ 11,500.00 1 $ - $ - $ 11,500.00 1 814/98 Single family 5% Loan
28 Berg 5824 - Innsbruck CL N $ 2,385.00 1 $ - $ - $ 2,385.00 1 8/4/98 Single family 5% Loan
29 Anderson 6442 Van Buren SL $ 1,106.00 1 S - $ $ 1,106.00 1 8/4198 Single family 5% Loan
30 Simonson 800 Pandora Dr. S 22,260.00 1 $ - $ - $ 22,260.00 1 814/98 Single family 5% Loan
31 Johnson 6800 Monroe SL S - $ 5,897.00 1 $ - $ 5,897.00 1 8/4198 Single family MHFA Loan
32 Hamm 563 - Janesville SL $ 8,133.00 1 $ - $ - $ 6,133.00 1 8111/98 Single family 5% Loan
33 Bartlett 5085 Topper Ln. S 10,93729 1 $ - $ - S 10,937.29 1 8/11/98 Single family S% Loan
34 Hendrickson 6431 Baker SL S 13,085.00 1 $ - $ - $ 13,085.00 1 8/31198 Single family 5% Loan
35 Notsch 1020 Lynda Dr. S 15,940.00 1 $ - $ - $ 15,940.00 1 91V98 Single family 5% Loan
36 Stolle 6005 - 5th St $ 12,655.41 1 $ - $ - $ 12.655.41 1 9/1/98 Single family 5% Loan
37 Wtka 6723 - Overton Dr. S 11,339.87 1 $ $ - $ 11,339.87 1 9/15199 Single family 5% Loan
38 Martin 580 - Kimball SL $ 7,400.09 1 $ - S - $ 7,400.00 1 922/98 Single family 5% Loan
39 Prentice 6950 - Hickory Dr. S 6,660.00 1 $ - $ - $ 8,680.00 1 922198 Single family 5% Loan
40 Fitzgerald 6141 - Trinity Dr. NE $ 8,000.00 1 $ - $ - $ 6,000.00 1 929/98 Single family 5% Loan
41 Lundequam S 25,000.00 1 $ - $ - $ 25,000.00 1 10/8!98 Single family 5% Loan
42 White 1370 - 69th Ave. NE S 25,000.09 1 $ - $ - $ 25,000.00 1 10/6/98 Single family 5% Loan
43 Cline 6800 - Jefferson St NE $ 5,920.00 1 $ - $ - $ 5,920.00 1 10/8/98 Single family 5% Loan
44 Bostrom 190 - Island Park Dr. $ - - $10,000.00 12 $ - S 10,000.00 12 10MM Multi -family MHFA Loan
45 Mohammad 490 - Faimronnt SL S 5,972.00 1 $ - $ - $ 5,972.00 1 10/13198 Single family 5% Loan
46 Schreiner 1331 Hticrest Dr. S 25,000.00 1 $ - $ - $ 25,000.00 1 10115198 Single family 5% Loan
47 Larson 6727 Washington SL $ 25,000.00 1 $ - $ - $ 25,000.00 1 10/15/98 Single family 5% Loan
48 Jones 1021 Lynda Dr. NE S 24,773.85 1 $ - $ - $ 24,773.85 1 1020198 Single family 5% Loan
49 Swedberg 7500 Lakeside Rd. $ 10,000.00 1 S - $ - S 10,000.00 1 1027198 Single family 5% Loan
Sub -Total $ 633.041.49 44 $15,897.00 13 $ 38,044.00 3 S 688,982.49 60 Units
— — —
49 Loans
Hyde Park Loans and Grants
HRA
MHFA
CDBG /HOME
Data
Type of
IName
Address
Loans I
Loans
Grants
Total
Closed
PropertyP
1 Kroone 5933 Main St NE S 9,277.18 1 $ - $ - $ 9,277.18 1 623/98 Single family 5% Loan
2 Hughes 6060 - 3rd SL NE $ - $ - $ 5,415.08 1 $ 5,415.08 1 9115/90 Single family CDBG Grant
3 Russell 217 -19 57th Ave. NE $ 8,000.00 2 $ - $ - $ - 2 1115/98 Duplex Matching Deferred
Sub-Total $ 17,277.18 3 $ _ $ 5,415.08 1 $ 14,89226 4 Units
3 Loans
Total S 650,318.67 47 $15,897.00 13 $ 43.459.08 4 $ 698,259.67 61 Units
52 Loans
1988 (NOV) LOAN ACMAT Y REPORT
I.O.R. - NOV 1899
112488
tA
LOAN SERVICING REPORT
Month Ending
October 1998
Installment Loans
Number of Loans in Portfolio 183
Principal Payments $ 47,239.02
Interest Payments $ 8,818.00
Late Fees $ -
$ 56,057.02
Ending Principal Balance 1 $ 2,114,303.75
Deferred Loans
Number of Loans in Portfolio
22
Principal Payments
$ 36.79
Interest Payments
$ 1.41
Late Fees
$ -
$ 38.20
Ending Principal Balance
$ 112,151.10
Totals
Total Loans in Portfolio
205
Principal Paid
$ 47,275.81
Interest Paid
$ 8,819.41
Late Fees Paid
$ -
$ 56,095.22
CRF Monthly Servicing Fee
$ 933.00
NET FUNDS RECEIVED
$ 55,162.22
TOTAL OUTSTANDING LOAN PRINCIPAL 1$2,22 6,454.85
1998 (NOV) LOAN ACTIVITY REPORT
LSR - OCT 1998
11/24/98
Fridley Loan Program
Loan Delinquencies
10/31/98
Number of Loans (183) * 22 7 3 3
Payments Due $ 2,773.30 $ 851.66 $ 305.77 $ 2,413.65
Notes:
* - Reflects the number of installment loans.
File: DELINQUENCY REPORT (10 -98)
Worksheet: LOAN DELIQUENCIES
Date: 11/24/98
M
L
11/24/98
1 to 2
2 to 3
Over 3
Loan Data
1 Month
Months
Months
Months
Number of Loans (183) * 22 7 3 3
Payments Due $ 2,773.30 $ 851.66 $ 305.77 $ 2,413.65
Notes:
* - Reflects the number of installment loans.
File: DELINQUENCY REPORT (10 -98)
Worksheet: LOAN DELIQUENCIES
Date: 11/24/98
M
L
11/24/98