HRA 04/03/2008 - 6260rilu,l
Apri13, 2008
HRA Meeting
Regular Meeting Agenda
7.30 n.m.
City Fall, Council Chambers
Call to order
Roll call.
Action Items
1. Approval of expenditures
2. Approval of March 6, 2008 Meeting Minutes
3. Ratification of Resolution Approving Rail Station Site Appraisal for Acquisition
4. Gateway NE Authorization to make Purchase Offer
5. Gateway West Development Agreement Terms extension
Informational Items
1. Northstar Rail Project Update
2. Monthly Housing Report
Adjournment
H:1My Documents\HRA\2008 HRA Agendas\ April 3 2008 Agenda Outline.docH:\ y DocumentsViM\2008 HRA AgendaMpril 3
2008 Agenda Outline.doc
AMC
CnY OF
FRIDLEY
ACTION ITEM
HRA MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2008
Date: March 28, 2008
To: William Burns,. City Manager
From: Paul Bolin, Asst. Executive HRA Director
Scott Hickok, Community Development Director
Subiect: Ratification of Action Taken By HRA on March 6, 2008
RE: Northstar Rail Property Appraisal & Acquisition
As part of the legal requirements to move forward with the potential condemnation of
the property needed for the Northstar Station, statutes require that the HRA officially
approve and accept the appraisal, through resolution, prior to depositing funds for the
acquisition.
A resolution accepting the appraisal was unanimously approved at the March 6, 2008
HRA Meeting by the members present. It was suggested by one member that the
adoption of the Resolution, approving the appraisal, be ratified through a motion of the
entire HRA Commission at their April meeting.
A copy of the already adopted resolution is included.
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority in and for the City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota, was held on the 6th day of
March, 2008, at
The following members were present:
Commissioner
introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING APPRAISAL OF CERTAIN
PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED BY THE HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND AUTHORIZING
QUICK -TAKE DEPOSIT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Fridley,
Minnesota (the "HRA'), as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01 The HRA has adopted its Resolution No. 2008 -01 on January 10, a true and
correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by reference.
1.02 In its Resolution No. 2008 -01, the HRA found that acquisition of the property
identified in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, for the
establishment of a Fridley commuter rail station and related facilities will serve a public purpose
and further the goals and objectives of the HRA.
1.03 In its Resolution No. 2008 -01, the HRA authorized the acquisition of the property
identified in Exhibit B for public use by negotiation or by eminent domain under Minn. Stat. §
117.01 et seq.
1.04 The acquisition authorized in Resolution No. 2008 -01 is done in conjunction with
the State of Minnesota, by and through its Department of Transportation, the Anoka County
Regional Railroad Authority, and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company.
1.05 Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 117.036 and in conjunction with its proposed acquisition
of the property, the HRA obtained an appraisal, which is attached hereto as Exhibit C and
incorporated herein by reference.
a.
i
1.06 In order to timely commence construction on the Fridley commuter rail station
and related facilities, including an underpass tunnel, the HRA also authorized acquisition by the
"quick take" process provided for in Minn. Stat. § 117.042. Minn. Stat. § 117.042 provides for a
deposit of the amount of an approved appraisal with the Court Administrator at some time
subsequent to 90 days from the service of notice of intent to take possession.
Section 2. Findings.
2.01 The Recitals in Section 1 are hereby adopted as Findings; moreover,
2.02 The appraisal attached as Exhibit C describes the market value of the property
identified in Exhibit B and is certified to be in accordance with the appraisal requirements of the
Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice and the Minnesota Department of
Transportation, and governing appraisal ethics and standards;
2.03 The appraisal amount of $3,165,000.00 represents market value of the property as
of January 17, 2008.
Section 3. Authorization.
3.01 Pursuant to the above findings, the HRA does hereby approve the appraisal
attached hereto as Exhibit C, and directs its staff to facilitate the deposit of the appraisal amount
of $3,165,000.00 with the Anoka County Court Administrator on or after April 30, 2008.
Adopted by the HRA this day of , 2008.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner
and, upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof-
and the following voted against:
WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed by the
Chairperson and attested to by the Executive Director.
1)
Chairperson Lawrence R. Commers
ATTEST:
Executive Director
s�
0
CERTIFICATION
I, ' the duly qualified Executive Director of the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota, hereby
certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. passed by the
HRA Commissioners on the day of , 2008.
William W. Burns, Executive Director
G:\ WPDATA\F\FRMLEY \71\DO0RESOLUTION APPROVING APPRAISAL 3- 6- 08.DOC
3
ISKI
ED-
MY OF
FR @LEY
INFORMATION ITEM
HRA MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2008
Date: March 28, 2008
To: William Burns, City Manager
From: Paul Bolin, Asst. Executive HRA Director
Scott Hickok, Community Development Director
Subiect• Gateway Northeast Property Acquisition Update
Sinclair Station - Update
Prior to last months meeting, Dan Wilson, the HRH's relocation consultant, presented a
purchase offer to the former Sinclair Station and received a verbal agreement from the
owner. Upon further review of the PA by the owner and his attorney, they had some
concerns with the agreement, specifically with our desire to do some investigative soil
borings. They have agreed to-our stipulations and anticipate signing the PA over the
weekend.
Last fall I discovered that in 1992, Sinclair's monitoring wells (MPCA Leak #00003963)
indicated that petroleum was being detected from the Citgo site north of 61 st, based on
groundwater flows. The tanks at both sites are newer and the MPCA has closed any
open cases they had on these properties. To ensure we aren't buying the next Three
Mile Island, it is advisable to have Liesch Associates drill some investigative borings
prior to closing on the property, and provide us an out if the site is extremely
contaminated.
There is currently cleanup money available from the Petrofund to assist in clean up of
any contamination found on the site.
Tae- Kwan -Do - Update
Dan Wilson has had ongoing talks with the property owner and remains optimistic that
something will be worked out soon. The Kims still believe our appraisal and offer price
are too low, yet they have not responded with any reasonable counter to our offer.
Alano Society
Paul Schwartz, appraiser, had a chance to complete the appraisal of the Alano Society
building located at 5925 University Avenue. Due to the large lot size (nearly 1 acre), the
size of the building (7,000 sq. ft.), and the age of the building (constructed in 1989), the
property has a high market value, $805,000. The City Assessor had valued the site at
$865,000 for 2008, down from a value of $874,000 in 2007.
As there appears to be a willing seller and very minor relocation benefits, staff
recommends the HRA offer to purchase the property for the appraised market value of
$805,000. Acquisition of this property adds nearly 1 acre to the project area of a future
redevelopment. Combined with the newer Van -o -lite building immediately north of this
site, there may be enough land area to initiate a redevelopment for a medical clinic,
senior building or other use.
SUMMARY
MARKET VALUE APPRAISAL
Looxmg easteny at subject's front and north side elevations as viewed from University Ave. Service Rd. NE
OF
THE "FRIDLEY ALANO SOCIETY NE" PROPERTY
5925 UNIVERSITY AVE. NE
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432
FOR
MR. PAUL BOLIN, AICP
THE CITY OF FRIDLEY HRA
BY
LAKE STATE REALTY SERVICES, INC.
MARCH 2008
ua3�
C•:i �SY^�J 's4'�'c
� ��t�.o.
-.
�. °�
K�� N ,�'`
�y'�.'� -.,£
��
�v
.# -'. 0nX' q•""i+Ye
:..y'. �d?T'
.�, -i.efi� rs
Looxmg easteny at subject's front and north side elevations as viewed from University Ave. Service Rd. NE
OF
THE "FRIDLEY ALANO SOCIETY NE" PROPERTY
5925 UNIVERSITY AVE. NE
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432
FOR
MR. PAUL BOLIN, AICP
THE CITY OF FRIDLEY HRA
BY
LAKE STATE REALTY SERVICES, INC.
MARCH 2008
Executive Summary
ADDRESS:
5925 University Ave. NE, Fridley, MN 55432
PROPERTY TYPE
Two -level commercial office building (no basement)
OWNER
Per Anoka County Tax Records, the owner is Fridley Alano
Society NE, with a mailing address of the subject property.
INTEREST APPRAISED:
Fee Simple
APPRAISAL PURPOSE
Estimate Market Value
APPRAISAL USE
Internal planning purposes and possible negotiation purposes
related to possible fee title purchase
SITE SIZE
36,400 s.f. per county plat map (in addenda of report)
ZONING:'
C-2, .General Business District, as governed by the City of
Fridley
HIGHEST AND BEST
USE
As vacant: Commercial use
As improved: Existing use or adaptive office re-use
FIVE YEARS SALES
HISTORY:
According to county records the subject property has not
transferred within the last ten years
IMPROVEMENTS:
A single two -level building with 7,000 s.f. (no basement)
PROPERTY I.D. #:
23- 30 -24 -21 -0140
ASSESSOR'S
ESTIMATED PROPERTY
VALUE (2008 estimated
values for 2007 payable
taxes):
Land = $189,000; Improvements = $684,900; total =.
$873,900
PROPERTY TAXES
(2007 payable):
$0.00 (no tax is due as it is owned by a tax- exempt entity);
$584.21 assessment balance - annual installment amount
VALUE BY COST APPROACH:
N/A
VALUE BY MARKET APPROACH:
$805,000
VALUE BY INCOME APPROACH:
NIA
APPRAISER'S ESTIMATE OF MARKET VALUE $805,000
DATE OF VALUATION:
March 10, 2008, the date of most recent inspection
APPRAISER:
Paul G. Schwartz, Certified General Appraiser, MN
#20002323
> > -q —4
—CL 0 I > 0
-n 0
_cx
a
c c i;
Go — —
0 0 r
SIT
-:z G) 0
0
z
CL 0 1 99
W CL
0 CO
ve 0
A CO )
a)
2
CD CL
cc)
0
=L 0
CD
c
0 Co z
CD
0 co
ID
65 0
CZ)
Cb
�5
-n
(D
O
C041) (Ivr
:-n
sk.
am
t
0 >
T3 < 0 0 0 CO)
0
CL CL CA
wg %7
ti
r
CD CD
> c
.
m
CO) C,
CO 0
Ol a
< ED w
a
w rn
CA
-69
CA 0
0
0
CA
> 0 0 CA
D
69
c"le
-
cx r CL
(a If C�'
R
co
CD CIO'-
0 CID
69 0)
69 N)
OD
> w
= CA
-4
OD
CA +
1 K) " CA CA
C>
CD
:3 C)
0
0
'D Pr
C13
4
CD
C)
-Gq
0 G)
+
0)
0 0 0 0 Ch
> :3 0
r
+
*e 'e
ca OD
CO
a
>
< to
0 14
+ Q
0)
>
m =r
ir
0 >(p
OD
co
.91 0 < 0
0
CD
Ol
rh
CA) 0) a CD CD
0 0
co 14 lc�D 0
pr 14
b
ca
O
-69
OD
M
0) m
0
0 0
> 0 E3 0
01 m
-4 G)
-
0 169
OD
C) r M m
e I ca if
0
0) -IL 0
fa -69
+ C4
CA)
m 0
C'.
CD CD ?L C>
C�
k o - C)
0
K) 140 -
C)
CD
CVl CD 0
CD -4 OD jo 0
flj
Z
p
0
M CA)
O
fA
5 G)
OD
0 0 00
0 0 F) 0 " 0
CL a CL
0)
-4
CA)
CA) OD
N) 0)
00 co
OD
+
o
= "
> 0) OD
:3 Pr C)
0)
o :,4 C5
Q C)
CL 0
o
CD
CD
C)
O
C4
0 0)
0 roo
raL L 9) -co
G)
0
.69
-4
OD
CO Ch If
0
0 to K)
0 C,
=r al�
0) CC3'
OD 14 0 r- COL
al C) 0
Lh 0
N) CD Cn
(D C� Pr
CL
(D
°
m 0)
t< 2) 0 —
OD +
0 0 0
�4 co
C)
20 CA)
> 8 0
:3 C: M
0 0
Ol -n
-co + >
+
to
0 if
< 70
OD w co
C. 00
14
0 VN W -
0
CD N3 Cn C) 0
a.
co
CD 0 CJI
l<
CD
00 -4 14
(7)
0 0 0 -Al
1 WO 0 4
M CL N-
CD G)
0
0 40
00
0 X
-C! o cc) if
0
CL
0 CD
.69 + '64 q
0 0
0 m
91
C)
rA IR G) O
OD N N 0)
lb
rh
Lh 0
0
O
Adjustment Analysis
The comparables located are the best available. Primary search criteria was similar
restaurant buildings w hich sold in the subject's market area. A total of seven applicable
and recently transacted comparables were located. Although these comparables are
similar to the subject, there are still differences which require adjustment. The
individual adjustments are explained following.
Time: The comparables sold from 4/06 to 1108. Each was adjusted based on 3% per
annum, or .25% per month. This time adjustment is based on appreciation which has
occurred in the market, which has been stagnant dueto an underperforming MSA, state
and national- economy. The time adjustment is primarily made to reflect changes in the
value of the dollar through passage of time, which has been about 3% per year during
this time period.
Year Built: For existing buildings, the market places emphasis on condition over that of
age, considering the variance of maintenance w hich can bring a building's effective age
to that less than 'its chronological age. All of the buildings are modern, all being
constructed since 1981. During this time period construction techniques and ene4rgy
efficiency have not dramatically changed so there is no difference due to age. Any
differences related to age and the physical depreciation which manifests due to age are
applied in condition.
Condition /Quality: The subject is deemed to be in average condition and of average
quality. This is similar to many of the comparables. Comparable 2 and 6 are in
average -fair condition, and are adjusted + 10% for their inferior condition. Comparable
3 is in good condition (partly a function of age) and is adjusted -10 %. Comparables 5
and 7 both in superior good condition and superior good quality are adjusted -20 %, or
-20% for each condition and quality factor. These adjustments reflect the approximate
premium the market would pay for superiority of each of these condition and quality
items.
Gross Building Area (GBA): The subject is 7,000 s.f. in size and the comparables are
both smaller and larger, ranging from 4,174 s.f. to 7,739 s.f. All are deemed to be of
similar size and the market would not acknowledge a difference size variation, with the
price paid per s.f. based on the per s.f. unit of comparison. No adjustments are
necessary for difference of size.
Site Size (Land to Building Ratio): The subject has a land to building ratio of 15.2:1.
This is similar to comparable 1 which does not require adjustment. The remaining
comparables have larger land to building ratios, meaning there is excess land for future
expansion or other site improvements. This is generally deemed to be a good thing in
the market, and a premium will be paid for a larger parcel. An adjustment is based on
M
J;
1 % per each whole unit of difference of land to building ratio, reflecting the market
preference for sites with more land area.
Location: The subject and all comparables have a desirable location on a major
thoroughfare. No major locational differences ere identified which would require
adjustment, so no adjustments are applied.
Construction Type: The subject is a wood frame structure, as three of the comparables
which do not require adjustment. Three comparables are concrete block construction,
a superior and more expensive construction type. These comparables are adjusted -5%
reflecting their . market superiority. Comparable 2, a mixture of concrete and wood
frame is adjusted -2 %.
Functional Utility: The subject has average functional utility, although it has a
commercial kitchen. The commercial kitchen is something not typically seen in an
office and is specific for the individual users needs. Although this kitchen costs more
per s.f. to build -out, it is deemed to be super- adequate for the market which would
prefer more office space for occupancy. Although some users may find a use for the
already built -out kitchen, most would not. This is deemed a neutral value contributor
and is not adjusted, recognizing that only some in the market may find it beneficial.
After adjustments, the comparables range from $87.09 to $152.62. The adjusted
average is $113.85/s.f., which is similar to the adjusted median, at $117.43/s.f. All
comparables are similar to the subject and have gross and net adjustments within
accepted norms. A final value indication of $115.00/s.f. is supported by the above
data, with consideration of the adjusted average and similar adjusted median, with all
comparables being good indicators of value.
The subject's value is therefore computed as follows:
7,000 s.f. X $115.00/s.f. = $805,000
29
ACTION ITEM
WIN HRA MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2008
MY OF
FRIDLEY
Date: March 28, 2008
To: William Burns, City Manager
From: Paul Bolin, Asst. Executive HRA Director
Scott Hickok, Community Development Director
Subject: Gateway West Development Agreement — Terms Extension
Despite Blueprint's continued optimism and interest from buyers, the severe slowdown
in the housing market, has temporarily stalled our project and we recommend updating
our development agreement to reflect these market realities.
Blueprint is currently in negotiations with 4 potential homeowners, generated by the
Parade of Homes. Blueprint feels very strongly that two of the potential owners will
move forward in the next few months.
Attorney Cerney is preparing a simple extension to the timeline contained in the existing
development agreement. This will be provided prior to Thursday's meeting.
O INFORMATIONAL ITEM
ri HRA MEETING OF APRIL 30 2008
CITY OF
FRUXEY
Date: March 28, 2008
To: William Bums, City Manager
From: Paul Bolin, Asst. Executive HRA Director
Scott Hickok, Community Development Director
Subiect: Northstar Rail Property Acquisition & Proiect Update
Northstar has become nearly a full time job for staff and our Mayor. We have made a
total of 6 trips down to the Legislature since our March meeting and I was able to
participate in the cross examinations for the condemnation hearing on March 11 "'.
Property Acquisition
As of the time of writing this report (1 PM Friday) we are still awaiting a decision from
Judge Sullivan but remain very confident that he will approve our condemnation.
On March 11th we went back into the courtroom and Main Street cross - examined Mike
Schadauer (MN DOT), Tim Yantos (NCDA), and me. Main Street also put Tim Nelson
(property owner's rep) and Rich Rovang (Met Council /Northstar Project) on the stand.
Mr. Rovang explained the collaborative nature of a project such as this and the Met
Councils authority to operate Northstar. Mr. Nelson's testimony seemed to only focus
on all of the ways that he perceives to have been wronged by the City over the years,
all related to his $13M Federal suit against the City
Legislative Actions
The "Bonding Bill" which was approved in early March contained a request for $10.6M
for the Fridley Station. Though the bill made some headway in the House, it was
introduced, but never given a hearing on the Senate side.
As I had mentioned in an e-mail update, it has become quite clear that we will need to
view our $3.1 M acquisition of land as a "local match" and that the Anoka County Rail
Authority will also be expected to view their $2.5M tunnel installation and land
acquisition as a local match. With the State's budget woes, we are doubtful that any
funding for the Fridley Station will come from this years legislative session.
Our Transit TIF Bill, as drafted last year, was approved and signed by the Governor
and gives us the ability to capture $2.7M from our 3 pre -90 Districts for the property
acquisition. This $2.7M consists of $900,000 cash and over $1.7M in future TIF
revenues from these districts that would have been turned back to Anoka County if we
had not received this legislation. This legislation was moved forward and approved as
originally drafted last year, despite our desire to make some modifications. The
Legislature wanted to pass a tax bill early in the session approving the non-
controversial items vetoed by the Governor last summer.
Though our legislation is newly minted, we have been working with our local legislators
to make changes that allow us to create a number of TIF Districts within the Transit TIF
area, rather than 1 larger district. The Senate is moving this forward rapidly, and it
appears that we should be able to have this minor change approved later this session.
Attached are a memorandum to the City Council describing the actions they need to
take in order for the legislation to become effective.
On other funding fronts, Mayor Lund has been working collaboratively with Anoka
County Commissioner Kordiak, Senator Chaudhary and Representative Laine to get a
meeting with Rep. Oberstar in the very near future. We are hoping they can persuade
Oberstar to come up with some funding that could be granted long before the next TEA
Bill is authorized.
Another source of potential funding became a possibility this past Tuesday morning
when Anoka County adopted the 1/4% sales tax. Commissioner Kordiak made it very
clear to the other Commissioners that he would vote for the sales tax increase if the
Fridley Station were a priority for the use of the revenue generated. As this is so new,
we haven't completely figured out, when funding may become available or what type of
process will be in place. Likely, the City will need to compete for the funds through a
grant application.
K KRASS MMONROE
James R. Casserly
jcasserly@krassmonroe.com
Direct 952.885.1296
Mary E. Molzahn
mmotrahn@kmssmonroo.com
Direct 952.885.4382
MEMORANDUM
To: City of Fridley
Attn: Paul Bolin, HRA Assistant Executive Director
From: James R. Casserly, Esq.
Mary E. Molzahn, Senior Development Analyst
Date: March 27, 2008
Re: Special Legislation -- 2008 Tax Bill (HF 3201)
Our File No. 9571 -71
During its 2008 regular session, the Minnesota Legislature adopted the attached special
legislation for the City of Fridley. This legislation is included in Laws of Minnesota 2008,
chapter 154, article 9, section 23 and is effective upon adoption of an approval
resolution and compliance with Minnesota Statutes, section 645.021, subdivision 3, a
copy of which is attached hereto, which requires filing the approval resolution and a
certificate of approval with the Secretary of State. You will also find attached the
Resolution and Certificate for City execution and adoption. If you would provide us with
two executed copies of the Resolution and Certificate, we will make the filing with the
Secretary of State.
Included below is a brief synopsis of the special legislation:
a redevelopment tax increment district, referred to as the Northstar Transit
Station District, may be created consisting of no more than the 40 identified
parcels
2. the requirements for qualifying a redevelopment tax increment district do not
apply to the Northstar Transit Station District
8000 Norman Center Drive, Suite 1000
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55437 -1178
TEL 952.885.5999 FAX 9528855969
www.krassmonroe.com
3. eligible expenditures within the Northstar Transit Station District shall include
costs necessary to acquire the land for and construction of a tunnel under the
BNSF railroad tracks
4. tax increments generated from Districts Nos. 11, 12 and 13 may be pooled and
expended for the costs described in Item 3 above
5. the 5 year rule does not apply to the Northstar Transit Station District
6. the use of. revenues for decertification does not apply to Districts Nos. 11, 12 and
13
Please contact us if you need any additional information.
Attachments:
Special Legislation
Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021
Resolution Approving Special Legislation
Certificate of Approval of Special Law
GAWPDATAIFIMMEY1 MORIBOUN JRC MEM 1.D0C
. Minnesota Legislature - Office of the Revisor of Statutes
Page 1 of 1
Sec. 23. CITY OF EMLEY; TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT,•
SPECIAL RULES.
(a) If the city elects upon the adoption of a tax increment financing plan for a district
the rules under this section ably to a redevelopment tax increment financing district
established by the city of Fridley or the housing and redevelopment authority of the cites
The redevelopment tax increment district includes the following parcels and adjacent
railroad property and shall be referred to as the Northstar Transit Station District: parcel
numbers 223024120010. 223024120009,223024120017,223024120016 223024120018
223024120012, 223024120011 ,223024120005,223024120004 223024120003
223024120013 ,223024120008,223024120007 223024120006 223024130005
223024130010, 223024130011 ,223024130003,153024440039 153024440037
153024440041 ,153024440042,223024110013 223024110016 223024110017
223024140008, 223024130002 ,223024420004,223024410002 223024410003
223024110008.223024110007 223024110019 223024110018 223024110003
223024140003, 223024140009 ,223024140002.223024140010 and 223024410007
(b) The requirements for ugRalif3dU a redevelopment tax increment district under
Minnesota Statutes, section 469.174, subdivision 10 do not ap& to the pcels located
within the Northstar Transit Station District which are deemed eligible for inclusion
in a redevelopment tax increment district.
(c) In addition to the costs permitted by- Minnesota Statutes. section 46q 176
subdivision 4i, eligible expenditures within the Northstar Transit Station District include
those costs necessary to provide for the construction and land acquisition for a tunnel
under the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad tracks
(d) Notwithstanding the provisions of Minnesota Statutes section 4691763
subdivision 2, the city of Fridley may expend increments generated from its tax increment
financing districts Nos. 11, 12 and 13 for costs permitted by paragraph c) and Minnesota
Statutes, section 469.176, subdivision 4j outside the boundaries of tax increment financing
districts Nos. 11, 12, and 13, but only within the Nordwar Transit Station District
(e) The five -year rule under Minnesota Statutes section 469 1763 subdivision 3
does not apply to the Northstar Transit Station District or to tax increment financing
districts Nos. 1 1, 12, and 13.
(f) The use of revenues for decertification under Minnesota Statutes section
469.1763, subdivision 4, does not apply to tax increment financing districts Nos 11 f.
12, and 13.
EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective upon approval by the ovg erning body
of the city of Fridley and u op n compliance by the city with Minnesota Statutes section
645.021, subdivision 3.
https : / /www.revisor.leg.state.rnn.us /laws/ ?id =154 &year = 2008 &type =0 3/26/2008
645.021, Minnesota Statute
2007 Minnesota Statutes
645.021 SPECIAL LAWS.
Subdivision 1. Name required. A special law as defined in the Minnesota Constitution,
article XII, section 2, shall name the local government unit to which it applies. If a special law
applies to a group of local government units in a single county or in a number of contiguous
counties, it shall be sufficient if the law names the county or counties where the affected units
are situated.
Subd. 2. Local approval required. A special law shall not be effective without approval of
the local government unit or units affected, except as provided in section 645.023. Approval shall
be by resolution adopted by a majority vote of all members of the governing body of the unit
unless another method of approval is specified by the particular special law.
Subd. 3. Filing required. The chief clerical officer of a local government unit shall, as soon
as the unit has approved a special law, file with the secretary of state a certificate stating the
essential facts necessary to valid approval, including a copy of the resolution of approval or, if
submitted to the voters, the number of votes cast for and against approval at the election. The
form of the certificate shall be prescribed by the attorney general and copies shall be furnished by
the secretary of state. If a local government unit fails to file a certificate of approval before the
first day of the next regular session of the legislature, the law is deemed to be disapproved by such
unit unless otherwise provided in the special law.
Subd. 4. Previously enacted law. Laws 1959, chapter 368, does not apply to any special law
heretofore enacted, whether or not it has been approved by the local government unit affected, but
such unit shall file with the secretary of state a certificate of approval for such law as required in
subdivision 3.
History: 1959 c 368 s 1,2; 1979 c 176 s 1
Page 1 of 1
https: / /www.revisor.leg.state.=.us /statutes / ?id= 645.021 3/26/2008
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIAL LEGISLATION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council ") of the City of Fridley, Minnesota (the
"City"), as follows:
WHEREAS, Laws of Minnesota 2008, chapter 154, article 9, section 23 (the "Special
Law ") was enacted by the Legislature of the State of Minnesota and signed into law by
Governor Timothy Pawlenty on March 7, 2008 and relates to special rules governing the
use of tax increment financing by the City within a designated area of the City.
WHEREAS, the Special Law is effective upon approval by the governing body of the
City and upon compliance by the City with Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, subdivision
3.
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, subdivision 3 requires that upon
approval of the Special Law by the City, that the City file a certificate of approval, as
proscribed by the attorney general, and a copy of its resolution of approval with the Secretary
of State prior to the first day of the next regular session of the Legislature.
WHEREAS, the first day of the next regular session of the Legislature is Tuesday,
January 6, 2009.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City as follows:
1. The Special Law is hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certificate of approval and a certified copy of
the City's resolution of approval with the Secretary of State prior to.the first day of the
next regular session of the Legislature.
3. The Special Law is effective upon. compliance with the above requirements.
Page 2 - Resolution No.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY THIS DAY OF
.2008.
SCOTT LUND - MAYOR
ATTEST:
DEBRA SKOGEN -'CITY CLERK
G: \WPDATA \F \FRIDLEY \71 \DOC \RESOLUTION ADOPTING SPECIAL LEGISLATION.DOC
CERTIFICATION
I, Debra Skogen, the duly qualified Clerk of the City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota,
hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No.
passed by the City Council on the day of __12008.
DEBRA SKOGEN - CITY CLERK
RA
3
CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL OF SPECIAL LAW
BY GOVERNING BODY
(Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 645.021)
STATE OF MINNESOTA
County of Anoka
TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF MINNESOTA:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, That the undersigned chief clerical officer of the City of
Fridley, Minnesota DOES HEREBY CERTIFY, that in compliance with the provisions of Laws,
2003, Chapter 21, Article 10, Section 10 requiring approval by a majority* of the governing
body of said local governmental unit before it becomes effective, the City Council at a meeting
duly held on the _ day of , 2008, by resolution did approve said
Laws, 2008, Chapter 154, Article 9, Section 23 by a majority* vote of all of the members thereof
(Ayes _; Noes _; Absent or not voting _} and the following additional steps, if any required,
by statute or charter were taken:
A copy of the City iesolution is hereto annexed and made a part of this certificate by reference.
Signed
(Official designation of officer)
(This form prescribed by the Attorney General and Runished by the Secretary of State as required in Minnesota Statutes '645.021 J
* If extraordinary majority is required by the special law, insert fraetion or percentage here.
GAWPDATAWOMLEYMMOCICERTMCATE OFAPPROVALDOc
Fridley HRA
Housing Program Summary
Cover Page
April 3, 2008 HRA Meeting
Report Description
Loan Application Summary Loan application activity (e.g. mailed
out, in process, closed loans) for March
and year -to -date.
Loan Origination Report
Remodeling Advisor
Loan originations for March and year -to-
date.
Shows the number of field appointments
scheduled and completed for the
Remodeling Advisor Services
administered by Center for Energy and
Environment.
E co
O
EO
N
Cl) N
v
� L
O `-
(6
Z 0
m
ULa
N �
C 47
R N
J U
N
C �
O �
V
6
Q C
Qa`
a>'
a =
0
O
� V Z
R r .Q
d
�0-a�
N 'L
c�
R L
J C
N
c I
O I
++ I
2 � I
-d 1
Q R C
Q 1
N
C�
�:+ 1
tl v
d -Q
Z Q c
� 0CD0o0oo0
I,- 00�00000I
N O O O O O O O O I
7
It 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
;I C*4 OOOOOOOOI
W C
0 V
LL m u-
C
U. O R 0 0 7
LL K o m LL
O R O C Z. �' C= i gu
W -� M LL C d O IX C
01 3 C -j
E W E w
W
E R R C -+
E m 00u_V c m� 0
R
° �� = = =w r =0
m
U)
.Q
R
3
W
W
V
01
L
E
CD O
y..
C
'r0—+
.Q
0.
R
L
d
N �
tm
C
V
R
0
c
3
0
V
C)
c
3
O
o.
N 0
O O.
C a+
LC O
O
2 v
L_ R
3 0
v �
CD 0
N O
V O
A2 C
c N
O d
O
.0
N C
O O
w r
a) m
� N
N N
C C
ca O
J R
v
L
X Q.
IL R
�+ O
C �
E E
O O
U Z
r
s
Fridley HRA
Loan Origination Report
March 27, 2008
Loan Oriainations
This Previous
Month Months YTD
HRA Loans (incl. CFUF Discount loans)
HRA Deferred Loans
Other Loans (non -HRA) _
Total
Funding Sources
Types of Improvements
Interior # of Projects % of Total
Bathroom remodel
poi,
This
- 0%
Previous
- 0%
Heating system
_ poi
Month
_ 0%
Months
YTD
Fridley HRA
$
20,000.00
$
-
$ 20,000.00
MHFA
$
_
$
_
$ _
Met Council
$
-
$
_
$ _
CDBG/HOME
$
-
$
_
$ _
GEE
$
-
$
_
$ _
Other
$
$
_
$
Total $
20,000.00
$
-
$ 20,000.00
Types of Units Improved*
`some households receive more than 1 loan, so the # of loans may not equal # of units Improved
This
Previous
Month
Months
YTD
Single Family
Duplex
Tri-Plex
4 to 9 Units
10 to 20 Units
20+ Units
Total
Types of Improvements
Interior # of Projects % of Total
Bathroom remodel
poi,
Kitchen remodel
- 0%
General plumbing
- 0%
Heating system
_ poi
Electrical system
_ 0%
Basement finish
_ 0%
Insulation
_ 0%
Room addition
_ 0%
Misc. interior projects
_ 0%
Foundation
1 100%
Exterior
Siding /Fascia/Soffit
_ 0%
Roofing
- 0%
Windows/Doors
_ poi,
Garage
_ 0%
Driveway /sidewalk
- 0%
Landscaping
- 0%
.Misc. exterior projects
- 0%
v
A
L
O
� DO
■;O
O
■� N
Qti
N
W O
w/
N
d m
E d
C
O Nr-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
O E
QUO
Q
N
m
m
E 75
C
O N 1- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
d
O v
Q U)
Q
CD Q) CD
0 0 CD CD
O
■
N O N Q M 75 5 y U O N
— - �Q()OZ0
>LL2Q2
O o
CO
r
� is is
O 7 O
0 5 a
c Q o
E
Ce
.O
CL
CL
E