The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 06/27/1968 - 7263PLANNING COMMISSION 1�EETING JUNE 27, 1968 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL• APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: JUNE 13, 1968 RECEIVE PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS-STREETS & UTILITIES StIBCONlNIITTEE MINUTES: NNE 20, 1968 RECEIVE BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMI�TEE MtNUTES • JtTNE 5, 1968 RECEIVE BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES: JUNE 12, 1968 ORDER OF AGENDA• 1. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: � P.S. ��68-03) SOUTHHAMPTON 2 `. Outlo� �2, Woxrel Addition. NARY PLAT, IAI� JOHNSON : Hold over until the Subcommittee makes recommendation. � 2. LOT SPLIT REQUEST (CONTINUED): L.S. ��68-09, ROBERT DE GA.RDNER: Lots 22 thru 25, Block 7, Spring Brook Park Addition. � 3. 4. Continued from June 13th meeting. LOT SPLIT REQUEST (CONT.): L.S. ��68-llz LEROY B. SMITH: iot 2, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition. Continued from June 13th meeting. REVIEW CHANGE IN P.D. (CONT.): ZOA ��66-16, HAROLD SCHROEDER BY CAMCO, INC.: James Solveson. ' PAGES 1-9 10-11 � 14-15 16-17 � 18-19 20 21 5. REVISIONS TO SIGN & BILLBOARD CONTROL ORDINANCE: 22 ,'!1� - � -Y6 �, �, �-� � _ � � 7, _ . ��ti� � ' r � \ � , '� . , w / _t/='�!C!,� V ., �. .. �1 �� u � - 1 PLANNING COr1MISSION MEETING JUNE 13, 1968 p�� 1 ' ROLL CALL• The meeting was called to order by Chairman Hughes at 7:38 P.M. � Members Present: Myhra, Jensen, Hughes; Erickson, Ylinen Others Present: City Engineer Nasim Qureshi ORDER QF AGENDA• 1. Chairman Hughes suggested delaying consideration of the Minutes because o£ the time schedule for the public hearings until later on in the evening. PUBLIC HEARING: REZODIING REQUEST, ZOA ��68-09, LARRY FERGUSON: Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Gundexson Terrace. Rezone from R-1 to R-3. � The public hearing notice was read by Chairman Hughes. Mx. Ferguson was not present. � Mr. Da.le Hagen, 7478 Hayes Street: We have a petition which we would like read into the minutes of this meeting. This will sum up our wishes. �:.._ The heading of the petition dated June 12, 1968 is as follows: We the undersigned property owners of single family dwellings and residents r�f the area in, around, and adjacent to Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Gunde"rson Terrace, , hereby petition the Planning Commission of the City of Fxidley to deny the xequest (ZOA ��68-09) to rezone the R-1 district to any,other zone than R-1. That the undersigned represent the majority�of the single family dwelling property owners in, around and adjacent to Lots�1 and 2, �lock 3, Gunderson Terxace, and hereby voluntarily signify our objection to such rezoning 'requests and respectfully request the Planning Co�nission to deny such requests. There were thirty-one signatures. . � MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Ylinen, that the'Planning CouQnission accept the petftion requesting denial of the rezoning request, ZOA ��68-09,. dated June 12,'1968. Upon�a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. .. .._�.__... .. �Virginia _�onr�d, 7440 Bacon Drive: Mrs. _Conrad stated they did not ca�e--. � to have an intlux of apartments. As far as D. W. Onan needing residencps, • there are still plenty of R-1 Districts. She did not think that apartment buildings built that close to private residences would be beneficial. � 0 Mike Svitak, 1381 75th Avenue: He stated he had not had the opportunity to sign the petition presented to the Planning Conanission this evening and. asked permission to do so. He opposed rhe rezoning. Henry G. Hamersma, 1405 Onondaga Street: When he built his house about a year ago, there were no apartments. I� there had been, he would not have built. - Planning Commission Mee.ting - June 13, 1968 . Page 2 ., MOTION by Erickson, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Commission close the Public Hearing of the"rezoning request, ZOA ��68-09, Larry Ferguson, of � Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Gunderson Terrace to rezone.from R-1 to R-3. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. ' Mr. Erickson commented that, obviously, this is pretty much of a single family area, and, at this particular time, he saw no reason to extend this type of zoning East of Central Avenue.. . MOTION by Erickson, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Commission recoffinnend to the Council denial of the rezoning request, ZOA ��68-09, Larry Ferguson of Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Gunderson Terrace to rezone from R-1 to R-3. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the•motion carried unanimously. � The Chairman said he'agreed with Mr. Erickson's reasoning. The present use of the area is not an argument in favor of additional multiples in that area at all. He informed the audience that the recommendation of the Planning Commission is not binding, but the decision rests with the City Council. This recouunendation will be forwarded to Council for their meeting on June 17, 1968. CONSIDERATION OF MLNUTES: � APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MAY 9. 1968: � MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Co�nission � minutes of May 9, 1968 be approved. Upon a voice vote,.all voting aye, the motion carxied unanimously. � ACCEPT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MAY 23, 1968: MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning minutes of May 23, 1968 be accepted. Upon a voice vote, all motion carried unanimously. ' ' RECEIVE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: MAY 13�1968: Co�is s ion voting aye, the MOTION by Exickson, seconded by Ylinen, that the Planning Commission xeceive the Parks & Recreation Co�nission minutes of May 13, 1968. Upon a. voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried una�limously. � RECEIVE PARKS"& RECREATION COMMISSION MINI7TES: MAY 27, 1968: MOTIOld� by Eri-ckson, seconded by Ylinen, that the Planning Cos�unission receive the Parks & Recreation Coiranission minutes of May 27., 1968. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. � RECEIVE PARKS & RECREATION COM�iIISSION MINUTES: JUNE 3, 1968: . . . MOTION by Erickson; seconded by Ylinen, that the.Planning Commission receive the Parks & Recreation Co�anission minutes of June 3, 1968. Up�n a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVE BUILDING STANDARIIS-DESIGN CONTROL MINUTES: MAY 15z 1968: MOTION by Erickson, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commission receive the Building Standards-Design Control mi.nutes of May 15, 1968. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, t�he motion carried unanimously. . ; , _ _ _ _._ _ . _ ;.� .. Plannint� Cousnission Meeting - June 13, 1968 Pa�e 3 � '� RECEIVE_BUILDING STANDA.RDS-DESIGN CONTROL MINUTES: MAY 27: 1968: MOZ'ION by Erickson, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commission receive the Building Standards-Design Control minutes of May 27, 1968. Upon a voice vote, all vofiing aye, the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVE BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES: MAY 22, 1968: MOTION by Ylinen, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning CoIISnission receive the Board of Appeals minutes of May 22, 1968. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried uuanimously. RECEIVE PLATS & SUBDNISIONS-STREETS & UZZLITIES SUBCO1�flKITTEE MINUTES: JUNE 11, 1968: MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Erickson, that the Planning Commission receive the Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee minutes of June 11, 1968. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unani- mously. 2. PUBLIC HEA,RING: PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT. P:S. ��68-03, SOUTIif�AMPTON 2ND ADDIQZON, JULIAN JOHNSON: Outlot �2, Worrel Addition. Mr. Johnson was not present, probably based on the action of the Plats and Subdivisions-Streets and Utilities Subcommittee. � • � Mr. Jensen said there were some unresolved questfons relative to the plat. The lots were not �in question but a street plan should be resolved. The Plats & Subdivisians-5treets & Utilities Subcommittee would discuss this problem at their meeting on June 20, 1968. MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Myhra, that the Ptanning Commission con- tinue the proposed preliminary plat, P.S. �68-03, Southhampton 2nd Addition, Julian Johnson of Outlot ��2, Worrel Addition until the meeting of June 27, 1968. Upon a voice v�te, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 3. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. ��68-09, ROBERT D. DEGARI�TER: Lots 22 through 25, Block 7, Spring Brook Park Addition. Mr. Erickson explained that he had talked to the petitioner and he has not resolved the matter of-Lot�26. MOTION by Erickson, seconded by Ylinen, that the'Planning Co�nission � continue the item of the Lot Split request �(L.S. �68-09) Robert D. DeGardner �- of Lots 22 th�ough 25, B1ock 7, Spring Brook Park Addition until the Jux�e 27, 1968 meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimousl: 4. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. ��68-11, LEROY B. SMITH: Lot 2, Block l, Spring Valley Addition. � � � Mr. Jensen, Chairman of the Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Sub- committee, stated the Subco�nittee had recotmnended apgroval. .The request •- involves a division of 137 feet from the South of Lot 2, Block l, Sprir�g � . Valley Addition. The Subcommittee, he said, made its'recommendation subject s � ,. i: _ _ _ ��.� � Plannin� Commission Meeting.- June 13, 1968 Page 4 `� to providing a 25 foot right of way for street purposes on the North of Lot 2 and a 5 foot drainage and utility on both sides of the division line and . requested that the petitioner provide legal document for the cansideration �of � the Planning Conunission. Because Mr. Smith was not present, Mr. Jensen felt there had not been enough time for hi:m to prepare the above information. MOTION bq Myhra, seconded by Erickson, that the Planni.ng Commission coa- tinue until the meeting of June 27, 1968 the lot split: request (L.S. ��68-11) Leroy B. Smith of Lot 2, B1ock 1, Spring Va11ey Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. � 5. CARTEx-DAY C�ANY: Approve Registered Land Survey, RLS 4�68-03: T'he Chairman said the purpose of the registered land survey for CarCer- Day Company is to simplify the legal description of the tract. The City Engineer told the Co�nission this property is owned by Carter- Day. There might be an easement on the South side for the high power trans- mission lines of Northern States Power Co. � MiDTION by Erickson, seconded by Ylinen, that the Planning Couunission approve the Registered Land Suxvey (RLS �'�68-03) of Carter-Day Company. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye; the motion carried unanimously. 6. VACATION REQU�ST: SAV ��68-03. HENRY G. SAFFERT: Lots 22A and 22B; Block 1, n Lyndale Builders 4th Addition for garage. Mr. and Mrs. Saffert were present. Mr. Saffert had consulted with the Gity Attorney who said �e would gat the inforuiation needed for the Planning Cammission. Mr. Saffert had received letters from Northern States Power Co. and Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. saying they had no objections to�his re- quest. The City Engineer said he had had a preliminary discussion with the City Attorney. He said if the Planning Conanission wished to recommend approval of the vacation, by tihe time it would go to Council he would have the correct legal procedure. - � � There was a discussion regarding whether or r�ot the easement.was filed on the plat. If it were, the City would have to release it. Then the matter � of the�letters from the Utility companies, whether or not they would be 100� effective in case of legal matters, was discussed. 1�OTION by Jensen, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Commission recom- ----� : mend appraval to the Council of the vacation request (SAV �68-03) Henry G. Saffert, of the Easterly two feet of the Southerly fifteen feet of the five foot by 20 foot anchor easement located at the Northwest corner of Lot 22A, Block 1, I,yndale Builders 4th Addition. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously, , n 7. PUBLIC HEARING: PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT. P.S. #68-04, BARTH ADDITION, . MERWIN BARTH: Lots 16 and 17, Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside. Mr. Barth.was present. s � A � . � n Plannins� Commissfon Meetint� = June 13, 1968 Page S 8. 9. The Chairman read the public hearing notice. :,� A proposed street pattern, including the dedication by Ando Terrace (South and East of the lot split) was.discussed. The City Engineer suggested that East/West easement be dedicated for Northern States Power and Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. u�ilities if the plat is developed before the area is and that a North/South dedication be provided for street. . MOTION by Ylinen, seconded by Erickaon, that the Planning Commission close the public hearing of the proposed preliminary plat (P.S. ��68-04) Barth Addition by Merwin Barth of Lots 16 and 17, Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside. Upon a voice vote, all voting ape, the motion carried unanimously. M�TION by Erickson, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Coa¢nission concw with the recammendation of the Subcouanittee and recommend approval of the pro- posed preliminary plat (P.S. ��68-04) Barth Addition, Merwin Barth of Lots 16 and 17, Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. .� LOT SPLIT REQUEST; L.S. �68-12, CENTRAL SERVICE CO.. KESTH G. HOLVENSTOT, AGENT: Lot 15, Block 4, Bennett Palmer Addition. Mr. Glenn E�ans represented Mr. Holvenstot and explained that the request was to split the South 24 feet of I,ot 15. � It was agreed the description of the lot split was_satisfactory. MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Ylinen, that the Planning Commission concur with the action of the Subcom�ittee and recommend to the Council approval of the 1ot split request (L.S. �68-12) by Central Service Company, Keith G. Hol- venstot, Agent, of the South 24 feet of Lot 15, Block 4, Bennett Palmer Addi- tion. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. REVIEW CHANGE IN PiANNED DEVELOPMENT (ZOA �66-16) HAROLD �SCHROEDER BY CAMCO, INC.: James Solverson. Mr. Howard.J. Dumphy, James Solverson; Peter J. Campion and Mervyn Eliason were present to discuss the requested change. _ Mr. Solverson and the Coffinission went over the list of items prepared by the Engineering Assistant. . A. Lots .�2. through 35, Block 10, Spr.ix�g,..Braak..Addition originally.. saere.not. _.... owned by Mr. Dumphy but were approved in the original plan. However, � they have now been purchased. B. 2. The total square footage of apartment area is 266,500+. � . Christian, Schroeder and Dumphy. � �"`� 3. We have shawn contour at two foot intervals. Plateau and then considerable � drop to creek. They are building the apartment on plateau area with the lower area for the recreation purposes. • 4. S. Gross floar area 98,700 + square feet. Total building area divided by three. . e � •� .� ; _ _-_ _ _ _.__ _ _ ,,�: Plannin� Commission Meetinr� - June 13, 1968 Pa�e 6 . 6. 7. 163 parking stalls - 1.5 per apartment. Doesn't apply. $. Propose ta have two exits on Ruth Street 55 feet from corner and a 22 foot wid� e��rai�Ice. , ,; f : 9. There is a walk along the River Road, and will put in a walk to pedestrian �ridge to lower level park. 10. Indicate the extension of Liberty storm sewer to creek -- applicant said they would install the storm sewer. 11. All area will be landscaped. The recreational area will be left as natural as possible. 12. Ground area will be sodded, parking lots blacktopped, sidewalks concrete. There will be plants along the north side of the property. � 13. Construction will be 2� to 3 story buildings, wood frame with brick, stucco base, brick veneer, balconi�s for all apartments, sliding doors, . lower apartments with walkouts to outdoor patio area, court or pool area will be depressed four feet. n• Mr. Myhra asked why the change made from the original structure as he felt the new decisioz was a step down arrangement. Mr. Solverson explained that the units were 21'x30` with the narrow end to the outside and showed why the new arrangement was more practical. At this point the question of signs and the couanercial area was discussed to some extent. The question was.whether or not the couQnercial would�be the same design. Mr. Dumphy said that would depend upon the person going into the com- mercial. Right now they are working on the first phase which is developing the apartment area. Mr. Erickson said in regard to the commercial property, the original progosal was. based on fi�u�r�,es given to the City as far as square footage goes, these figures were� rrect and now you are ab�out an acre short. You are losing part. of the parking area for the commercial. When this complex was proposed earlier, it was proposed for one design f-or both apartment complex and co�ercial area. You are asking us to split it into two pieces with two designs. What was wrong, in your opinion, of the exterior design of the original'plan? Mr. Solverson answered tliat it was his opinion that stucco with brick combination would make a more handsome building. . C. 1. The development schedule depends on the Planning Coumiission and Council approval. They were thinking of starting the apartment complex this fall and finish�by next�summer, com�nercial the suu�er of �1969 finishing the following spxing (1970). n Chan�es from Approved Plan. 1. We have..not provided garages mainly because the garages shown on the previous plan would be too expensive to build due to the subsoil condition, : � � i. . _ - � . � Plannin� Co�nission Meetin� - June 13, 1968 � pa�e 7 and you would have to haul in at least four feet of fill. We would like it as an option. 2. We try to encourage people to walk over to the commercial area, so no road has been planned between the apartment complex and co�nercial area. :� Chairman Hughes, speaking to Mr. Solverson, said that the plan he is requesting _ is for parking lot in the lower area. Does that mean he is requesting optional � building of garages or not? Mr. Solverson said he wished to change to no � garages. � � i_ __- n � D. 1. Ely Circle still has to be vacated. Chairman Hughes said the lot in the northwest corner really did not have to enter into the Planned Development District, but now it is a significant problem. 2. Ely Circle -- it is officially a street and has to be vacated. 3. Mr. Dumphy explained that Mr. Schroeder was the petitioner in the original petition and it was in his name, but actually, Mr. Dumphy was the petitionE Mr. Schroeder drew the schematic design, but when approsched to design � the buildings, he was tied up. Chairman Hughes said it seemed that the petition had been granted to Mr. Schroeder as a matter of recoxd. The City Engineer stated the application was submitted by Howard Dumphy, owner and prepared by Buetow & Associates. All contracts and.letter approving the complex were written to Mr. Schroeder and a copy to Mr. Dumphy. 4. 5. There is approximately three acres of recreationa� area divided into children's area and adults' plus the pool area. There is a walk on the right of way on.East River Road. The Engi.neer said 24 feet is to be dedicated for a street and the new property line would i�e 24 feet east of the present property line. The 24 foot easement is to expand East River Road. There is a service road on the South of the � complex between Liberty and 79th on the east side. We have four lanes on ` East River Road. For the txaffic into this complex, we have to have at least another 12 foot right turn lane and 12 feet for left turn lanes to the west. This is the overall plan. We do have a service road running on the south side. 6. The house:on°-Lots 32 through 35, Block l0, Spring Brook Addition is to be remaved. The City Engineer called attention to the fact that there are a large number of streets publicly owned in the Planned Development District which.are � included in the area figures and the City is actually giving up the Iand which they own. When we quote a 24 foot right of way, we figured this in the total land requir.ement.of the complex. This P..D.-.zo�ing is quite a step ug from R-1 to R-3 and-e-2S.- The whole idea is �hat we can get a development which is an asset to the cot�anunity. � _ The original plan for the entrance to Ruth Street was 110 feet from the inter- --°--- . section and now--it is cut down to 55 fee�t which makes the entrance too�close . � � � . . � . S � . . . . � . ,. Planning Coirenission Meeting - June 13, 1968 Page 8 •� to the intersection which we strongly discourage because of the stop sign and traffic. He continued that when this complex was originally approved, there was a covere building shown for recreational purposes. That has not been provided. (Mr. Solverson said it couLd be provided in the basement of the complex.) ___ - There has been comments made that the area north of the creek was not originall ._ . figured in the apartment complex and was a mistake. You could cut down the . total complex to the amount which the land on south of creek would bear. (Mr. Solverson said it becomes unfeasible to puz in a swimming pool in a small dev.elopment.) Mr. Qureshi added that the City has�rezoned it up to a better land use. There are complexes which have swimming pools and �ch less units. Because traffic is quite important in this area, we would lilce the entrance moved north on. Ruth Street. The idea is you have to provide for enough storage of cars at the intersection. Liberty is a more heavily travelled street. You are moving the buildings closer to the road than these were before. The complex has been lengthened and is closer to residential area and streets. (Mr. Solverson said they have kept to all the settaack requirements.} The City Engineer commented that it would be quite expensive to build garages in there, nobody disputes that, but it.was approved in the complex. n Mr. Myhra said that it seemed to him it would be advisable to have-a couple of weeks to go over this request. The Commission spent almost a year before they approved the original plan and it seemed they should ha�e time to go over this. He would like to bring it back in a couple of weeks. (The members, in answer to his request, were given copies of the proposed plan for their individual study. ) . . - . � Mr. Hughes said there is an open item on the road situation which might be well to discuss between the petitioner and Engineering Department. � Mr. Qureshi asked Mr. Ihimphy to give the City a letter explaining the situation .__ regarding. the original request being in the name of Mr. Schroeder and the . engaging of another architect. �� MOTION by Erickson, second�d by Jensen, that the Planning Commission place the discussion of the Review Change in Planned Development (ZOA �i�66-16) --. Harold Schroeder by Camco, Inc. on the June 27, 1968 Agenda, and that the members of the Commission be given capies of the proposal so that they can study � it. Upon-a voice vote, all voting aye, the motian carried unani.mously. 10. D. J. LOFTSGAARDEN: DISCUSSION THERRES FARM FRONTING UNIVERSITY AVENUE AND NORTH EDGE OF CITY• . � Mr. Lo€tsgaarden stated he represented the Walter Therres family who have � owned the I16 acres for about fifteen years. The land is zoned industrial, _„ and because_it is in a low area, there.are water table problems•. The area ... . he spoke abaut.:this evening is pretty iso�.ated from the rest of the property _., because of .the swamp. He asked the opinion of the Comanission on_putting mobile homes there. � . e ., � .� n � . . _ _ _ � _. . _. . . ;.�.: Plannin� Co�nission Meeting - June 13, 1968 Pa�e 9 He was informed the City was aware bf the problems there, but that they would be solved in time when the abutting area would be developed. Mr. Jensen explained to Mr. Loftsgaarden that the Co�nission could not - give him much of an expression on the plan until an application were filled out and the request g.o through regular channels. It was felt there would be tremendous public opposition building residential and industrial together. 11. 12. � 13. There was no action taken. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. �68-10, THOMAS E. MARXEN: South 138 feet of the North 306 feet of Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision �108. Mr. Marxen was not present. No action. CONTINUED: PUBLIC HEARING, REZONING REQUEST, ZOA �68-09, LA,R1tY FERGUSON: Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Gunderson Terrace. Rezone €rom R-1 to R-3. (See.pages 1 and 2) Mr. Ferguson entered at 8:30 P.M. Due to an error, he received a public hearing notice with the wrong time and therefore he was not heard by the Planning Commission. . 1�OTION by Erickson, seconded by Myhxa, that the Planning Co�ission inform the Council that due to an error, Mr. Ferguson received a public hearing no�ice with the incorrect time of the hearing and therafore, he was mot heard by the Planning Co�nission, and further, that the Commission recomanends to the Council that in considering the_recoaunendation for the denial, that the Council take this fact into consideration. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. PLAIdNER FOR HYDE PA.RK AREA • �The City Engineer explained that the Council authorized hiring a con- sultant for this area, and a letter has been received from Nason, Wehrman, Knight and Chapman, inc. The Chairman read the letter from the consulting firm. Mr. Jensen said the time table should�be verified. MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Ylinen, that the Planning Commission request -_ the firm of Nason, Wehrman, Knight and Chapman, Incorporated to go ahead with a Contract and that when it is received, the City Attorney check it. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT• There be3.ng no further business, the Chairman adjourned the meeting at 11:55 P.M. _ . � . 0 Respectfully submitted, �� . Haz' 0'Brian Recording Secretary . � � � � 10 :, ��ATS $ SUBDTVISIONS'� �TR�i�TS � UTZLITIES SUBC4MM��IIITTE$ JUN� 2Q, �96$ FAG� ]. Th� m@�ting was called to ord�x by Ct�aixman J�n�@n at •$:00 P.M. �0 CALI,: Members present�: Ja�sean� Myhrt, SGhmedeko, Na�e]. M�mber •absent; Albrecht 4thers pres@nt: �t�gineox�.ng Assis�ant Daxr�l, �1ark 1. CONTTNUED PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT:±'�.3.�66-03, 9QUTH�iAMPTQN ��2 . , _..., ...�,_ �DDTTTON,_,�JLiAN JOHN3�N CO�iSTRUCTIQN CQ= Outlot 2� WOrx0�,�8 Addn, The Subcommittee and Mr, Julian Joh�son m�t a� s�v�n o�clack and walked over tha area. Aft@r chocking an aerial topo� map and ha1� sect�on� �kha �ub- comm�t�Ge� came ug with sevaral pxop4sed stxeet la�routs, buC £e�.� that i� �Ir . Johnson cauld get the cooperatiqn a� the� owa��r� .�� -t�, land to the North and South, pexhaps bettex �treat p�.ans Gou].d b� evolved. Mr. Johnson agreed. . M�TION by Nagel, secon�d by Schmedek�, that the cp�tinu�d proposed preliminary plat, P.B, +�68-p3, Southham�aton Zr�d Addit��.on, Ju�ian M. Johnson Constructiqn �o, of Outlo� 2, Worr�l�s Add�t�.pn, be continued un�il the next meetin� o£ July 18, 1968. Upot� a vo3.�a vot�, a11 vating aye, the rnotion carriad unan�mausly. 2. U�D LOT SPI,IT R� UEST: L.S. i�68-03 JOS$PH ZIZAK; �OtB 6 , loc 2, Hy e Paxk A t an. Becaus� Mr. Zizak was not present, �t was a�sumed he had not �emplved his problem. This item was tabled tQ July 18� 1968. �. YACATION STUDY: S6th Avenue b�tween a'kh and 7th Street. Th� m�mbers, individually, had �hecked �ha ar�a xa see how �.t would b� a�fedt�d i£ the s�reot were vacated. I� wa� not�d th�� the �xoparty owners �►ould h�.v� na use for a paved street as �ha�e Mas access to 6Lh Street and 7th Street. Al,so that 7th St�rept has heavy traf£iG at the present time and would probablT increa�o �n the £utur�. Naw that there is a$torm sewer in ths� DxiYe�Itt, �,t was noted tha� 4th Street cou�d be a ma�.n s�raet and trs��ic CQming fxom th� Drive-In wauld use 56t}� Avenue bringi,ng too much traffic through the neaghborhood and the p�ople would probably prefer �aving it vacated for that �eason. Also, if the street were vacated, p�l �i�ns o£ a stxeet being there would have to be obliteratesd, T�ey could npt vacate and leave it th� w�y i.t is now �s it wpuld be an eyesore. Tt seems twelve people ar� invoived and th� S�tbCO�uai.ttee rvished a noxice ta bo sen� �o the� inviting them to the meeting o� Ju1y 18,rni�68, ' �� 1' Plats $ Subs. St. � Util. Mt�. June 20, 1�b8 p�g@ 2 � , �, n MATIRN by b�yhra, secor�ded by Nagel, that the �la�s $ Sub�3,v�,��,qr�� &treqts � U��,�it�es Subcommittee xoquest Darx�l Giar'�, �ngir�aer�,t�� As��stant� to aer�d out �oticas to the proporty own�xs ab�tting 66th Avenuo to a�ktor�d a� in£ormal meoting or� July 7.8 1968 0� t�e Pl�ts $ Subd�.v�.sion��Stre�t� $ U'Gili,ti�s Subcomm�t�a�e ��x th�o d��CLI$910�1 a� �Ch� prapas�d vacati�o�n of �6th Avenu� botw��n 6th and 7th straets. Upon a voic� vpt�, ail vot�ng aya, th� �_ mat�on carxi.od unanimous].y. ADJOURNMBNTs MOTION by Nagel, secoz�ded by Myhra, �o adjourn tha me�t�ing at 8:a0 F.M. Motion carried. itespectful].y subm3�t�d by Haze� 0'Bxian R�cording Secrstary n � r1 r 12 t n James Solverson bCa�ca Incor�ornted 7a35 ��yzLta �oulevarcl rrinneapolis , ��innesat� uear ;��r. Solvvrson: 0 June 24, 1a68 �'l�ase find enclos�ci a co�y of note� taken at an informal meQ�i2i�; that �?�Q 1�1anFiii�� CQrimission held o� June Z1, 1968 for the pur�as� of discussion of your apartr�ent co:�nlex. .1�.1 of tlie comu�ents with exeeption o£ it�m 33 are with � ref�r�*�c� to �ateriai you Izav� a3.reacty subr�itte� or additional materi�l Lii3t �uy bt� naecied. Iter� 3 is r:.ea3�t to �oint ou� �o you t�-�at there are Iands with in your a��art��nt co��plex anci the caL,mercial layout tl�iat are not zo1�eS �raperly (P.D.) �eforE any constructic?n co�nry�nc�s �du r�ust get these areas properly zonc�, th�refore, you ��iould m�ake ap�lication in order to �et this pxocess started. Oiie itet�� not �entioned is the �atter of ge�tin�; all streets ancl easen►en�s vacate�, also. This too rec�t�ires ar appl.ication to start }�roc��dings. This lis�. of co�nc3�nts is not necessarily all that �,ay be talked avQUt, but t:iey are su�,�e of th� itAms discussed up to this point ar,cl you may he asked to comrtent and inciicate yc+ur �Ians . � n BC:rf Encl. cc : Ho� aru Du:nphy 'tours very tru2y, � ., . _ '; , �' / i Darre2 `�C2ark'.;'��nb�neerin� �lssist�ant � n ALANNING COMMZSSION ME�TING (IN�ORMAL DISCUSSION) JUN� 20� 1968 The iniormal d�cussio� 4� the rev�ew chan�a �� F��nned Aeva�opment, zqA �66-16 by Camca, Inc. convened at 9,00 P.M, in the CQnferenc@ Room with th� �ollowing m�mbers present, Hugh�s, �rickson, Je�sen, Myhra, Xlinen and Enginesring Assis�ant Clark. The �qllowi�g list �s for consideration by th� requestors: 1. Need accurate drawing showing River Road width and a proposal for the appropriars sidewalk and turn �ane dedications. G�fdelines: ��Y •r`^ Want suffic�ent spacs �ox le�t and righ� turn ��s (w�th stacking space) for commercial area. ' � Want su�fi.cient space �ar snow stara�e and sid�walk th� full length o£ the tract (commexcial and residential). 2. Naed accurate drawin�s of the plan ior the er�tire tr�ct (commercial'and residenti�l)._ 3. Need requsst for rezoning of areas nat now in P.D. arer�. 4. Need a revision of the plan ior street access at Southa�st corner to p�vovide more stacking space. S. Need building design for the commercial building to �how conpatibility with new apartment building. 6. 8xterior appearance seems to.�ack tyin� into thC s�to. Need ta reconsider ove�all appearance. l�i 1` � .. ._ . l4 n BUILDING STANDARDS - DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 5, 1968 The Meeting was called to oxder by Acting Chairman Dittes at 8:05 P.M. NIEMBERS PRESENT: To.nco, Biermann, Dittes MEMBERS ABSENT: �rickso.n, Hauge � � OTHII3S PRESENT: Clarence Belisle-Bldg. Inspector, John Breher-Bldg. Official 1. CONSIDERATION pF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A Z-UNIT APARTMEN'1' BUILDING ON LOT 2, BLOCK 1 AUS ADDITION THE SAME BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF �' WAY AND EAST RI� ROAD OR 691 EAST RIVEft ROAD FRIDLEY MINNESOTA. R UEST BY ROY II�ICKSON, 64�.1 UNIVII3SITY AVENUE N.E.. FRIDLEY. MINNESOTA. After a le.ngthy discussion on this matter,.the followizlg motion was made; MOTION by Tonco to accept the proposal subject to the following stipulations: a.� Designatio:� of soundproofing between apartments and corridors b. Fireproofing of hallways and boiler room .c. Planting desig.nation on landscaping plan d. Trash or gaxbage storage area e. Con,crete paxking curbs in parking lot � f. 5'0"�easement for sidewalk on 77�' Way and East Rivex Road g. Indicate what the exterior of the building is and-ma.intain Code of 50f brick or stone facix� n Seconded by Biermann. IIpon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. 2. CONSIDEF?ATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT 7 INDUSTRIAI, BUILDINGS, 5 GENERALLY LOCATID ON 8� AND BEECH STREET AND � 2 GELVERALLY LOCATID ON 8�' AND ELM STR� THE SAME BEING LOTS .12-1 AND 21- 0 BLOCK 2 ONAWAY ADDITION. UEST BY BERNARD JULKOWSKI, 1420 MOLAN TERRACE, MINNF,APOLIS. MINNESOTA. � There was a discussion on the building design and paxking concerning this proposal. MOTION by Tonco to accept the proposal subject to�the following stipulations: a. Party wall between each building (63' X 70' ea.� to be a common wall b. Change front setback to read 35 feet c. Add three pa.rking spac�es in front per marked drawings (these dxawings to be returned for permit� � d. Add curbing on all driveways, and precast curb stops i.n rear of building e. Reax parking space to be advanced away from the alley 4'0" . f. Change front elevations to have brick panels reaching to the roof g. Plantings per marked drawings Seconded by Biermann. IIpon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motio.n carried unanimously. - � 0 � 3• n 15 BUILDING STANDARDS - DESIGN CONTROL"MEETING, JUNE 5, 1968 PAGE 2 CONSTDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A COUN'I'RY VILLAGE SUPER MARKET 116' X 0' ON PARCEL 202 AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION 10 THE SAME BEING 1 01 MISSISSIPPI STREET. REQUEST BY GEORGE WALQUIST 4230 CENTRAL AVFNUE MINNEAPOLIS,.MINNESOTA. There was discussion as to plot plan of this proposal. MOTION by Biermann to accept this proposal subject to the following stipulations: a. Recommend clnecking with the City Engineer about the radius of curbed - approaches b. Elimination of o.ne parki.ng stall located in the Northeast cornex of� � the paxking lot and provide fenced'rubbish or was�e disposal axea o.n the Northeast corner of the proposed building with a gate facing the North side of the fence. c. Rear yard setback be 5'0" instead of 3'0", also changing front planting strip to a narrower width to conform with the parkizzg requirements. d. Show on plan 2 additional e�its in the rental area � e. Sidewalk in front of building to be raised at least 6" above blacktopped parking area and increase this sidewalk width to 7'0"; 2'0" of thia sidewalk to be•considered as part of the pa.rking requirements f. Curbing around all planting areas g. All pla.nting'areas to be either white rock or sod -'at owner's option Seconded by Tonco. IIpon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. 4. CONSIDERATION OF A R UEST TO CONSTRUCT A 7-UNIT APARTMENT BUIL])ING LOCATID ON LOTS 11 12 1 AND 1 BLOCK SPRING BROOK P.ARK ADDITION THE SAME BEING 2 1� �' WAY FRIDLEY MINNESOTA. R UEST BY P�UL BURKEIOLDER 860 ALDII�T WAY FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA, There was discussion as to the construction and plot plan of this request. MOTION by Bierma.nn to accept this proposal subject to the following stipulations: a. Provide fenced rubbish or gaxbage storage axea b. Soundproof walls between apa,rtments and corridors c. Provide 1 3/4" solid core doors for apaxtment entrances . d. Amount of brick facing to be incxeased to comply with Code e. A 5'0" wide easement for sidewalks located parallel with 79�' Way to be provided Seconded by Tonco. unanimously. .r� • � i Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried The Meeting was adjourned at 10:50 P.M. i, spec full submitted, ��. �.�.�-� (.�0 BREF�R, Building Official � i 0 1' 16 �► THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF.APPEALS MEETING OF JUNE 12, 1968 The Meeting was called to order by Chairman Ylinen at 7:35 P.M. ' N�E�RS PRESENT: Minish, Mittelstadt, Ylinen NI�EftS ABSE'NT: Ahonen, 0' Bannon OTFiE�RS PRESENT: John Breher, Building Oificial MOTION by Minish� to'approve �-�he minutes of the Ma.y 22, 1968 Meeti.ng. Seconded by Ylinen. IIpon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion caxried unanimously. ' � 1. REQIIEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 4.26 FROM,��EET TO 2� FEET OF FRONT YARD, TO PERMIT CONSTRIICTION OF A DETACI�D GARAGE ON LOT 8 BLOCK 2 REARRANGII�NT OF PLYMOUTH ADDITION THE SAME BEING 211 �' AVENtTE NORTHEAST F'RIDLEY MINNESOTA. R UEST BY LLO_YD BLASHILL, 211 45�' AVENtTE NORTHF�ST. FRTDT,F:v_ �vrT��mm� _ Mr. arid Mrs. Blashill and Mr. John Polymeros were preeent to present Mr. Blashill's appeal. MOTION by Mittelstadt to close the Public Heaxi.ng. . Seconded by Minish. Upon a voice vote, there being no na.ys, the motion caxried !1 unanimously. . MOTIOPT by Mittelstadt to accept the variance as the proposed gaxage is in line � with the�neighbors at 201 45� Aven.ue Northeast. A second garage located as proposed would n.ot hinder vision from 22 Street. Sec.onded by Minish. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion caxried una,nimously. � 2. 0 /ri/�I11 l : \II • ' "• C. FROM 35 FEET TO 30 FEET ON N'I'Y, MINNESOTA. THE SAME Mr, Terrance C. Haik spoke for his own request. Mr. Carl Paulson was present but voiced no opposition.. MOTION by Minish to cloee the Public Heaxing. Seconded by Ylinen. IIpon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. � � � � � � � 1`7 BOARD OF APPEALS - JUNE 12, 1968 PAGE 2 � MOTION by Mittelstadt to accept the vaxiance as there were no obstructions of traffic,�and also it is an improvement to the property. Seconded by Minish. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion caxried una.nimously. . ADJOiIRNNlII�1.' : . The Meeting adjourned at 8:25 P.M. � Respectfully submitted . JOHN PREHER � . Building Official � . � . ' l 0 / r � : -- — _.. . Lond i'lonn�n� I✓ / . ��ys ��;yhnoy ;CS uf.. � �n� Survrc,'u� Q 1r��a�lis 3? ,o,�S ��s;,,rq E i� G! N� E R I t� G, I N C. �.��;,�,��o Civ�l fi ,tfunitipal SUnse! 4-E066 En ,nec�rm � . � � � � En�c ineers � Sur vec�ors . + � � ��'��5�� D� ��L�.'�� O� �'",h,-�f';' ..�'l�-° :�Q;�c�i��r • � . . ,r .. . : �i � . _ � � \ - . ; \, � _ � i � ,�__ _ -/�76 - - - - �cr,yl� - / "= -lG � �. � ..� - - . � �� ' ' ' � : . " ,� , o • GfiV�'? �''' / .P�f✓ , '._ " ! —1 t I --- - . - � - ---, - -- - --- � . 1 � /� �`r 'Q•_ , � � r� ' � t .�. • � Q� O: �-s�� V ' V � � " � � � "� ` � ... � � _ '•� �_ '��i ` ` � 23 � '� � � - -�-- ; � �,,� ��_:,i.,T �,� -�,� ' �i_ # ' � --y ' � ' . _ . _ ,. . _.. _. � C� I , ---11�-�-�-____� _��____�___.__ Z_ .._ _:—_.--- - --�- -----__�_.—_._.._ _�,, , :��T � r/%�a F�! l:` G' 1�-� �:'; -_ ;1% � � . _ _ � �: `s• - < <= , . , . � i �? ��: �rr�::�' ��..� f,'io�'� . 7, S'r- rt��- i°ra� :.' l��,r,¢. � J I . . � �: � . . . . . . . • . _ ieNOh:9 f'DV/.�7"/�' . . //rel'ebtf cerfi�'i, thof fhis is o frue ond ca�rrrcf rePresenfotion o�0 su^✓C(, ��1t �ndOryBS �'!hc oborr drsuy6�ed ,`an�,ond nF'�/x luo� on. �ol/ bw/dm�s , thcrcon , ond o// risib/e �oo�imenfs ,!`ony, {izm ar ov� soid /and. As surver,ed � me ih� �'- �=`cby . �' A.D !9 �': : SUB URBAN fNGlNEEfZI�'VG , /NC. ' ' . Ln ineerS E� Surr� rs ,., -: � 9 ` - • ' . �4 ,9�_ ,. ,�. - �° ... ; . ; %7 �7.9 by ' � � i� ` . ��s' �; ; . _ • . . . , . --, : .. . . L.S. #68-09 Robert DeGardner 19 � � - . •• . Lots 22 thru 25, Block 7, � _ . .� Spring Lake Brook Park Additio . . �.tCc� � �� K� f . . 5`�`Li��':t• -f1��u .� � �� . . - � � `` \ ' � f! s ��' . . 4. ` ��Y `�fS\if1' • .1 . . ' •. . �� - . . � ' • ` ��1� � l � �� 1� ' _� I'. .;41... ` . . . . . .��s'"' � �„�. 1 , , =' � � . .,. � E �j p) /�»� � � _ . . . , � : . ' f 2.. y. . ? � . � � � , of . 1e..t,+I �/� � � - ` �,I•.i � A C��l� `�i 1 i �. �i�� ,YC�'/ \.i ��-'�••s� ....iGd:.y'....... \`` .,-. . 1.:�`/�� :� i' ° ..i.� � \,/4�� ,� .....� lt�• �_ - .� .ti-. .,. �_� Il'� - � ) aif l� )� N lii= -jp � �� •� tn.v = �/ � ��•JS _ ; r� ' l�lf• �, � . � . � � y � ' � /3 ; � . 3 Qt F I ! ► � � I � � � 'p, ;~:�\.�-�' �,�� T m1�`r>>�`u�� , �� •f� � � .. + w I � i `'. r•f, t'=`�t + 4 ` '� ' p', r �` "�/ ! .f 3 � 7 �� /,e �St • sz„� � � 7 3 � t �c�7 a s �e��',• n ��'�• � ` 7�i1 •`' ''•J74� �irs Da i.. •Ii. � �� s :� .oia � I 1 � � %�! \ ..�� ``�y��P%� t . ^ `'. ' ��7/�i 1,!� � .'� �� .�,rj.w . \ %--..r .+,I"°"y2 .�t /7 J� .I.{ � � ,`{, I •p,'�1��} lt�� \. �\ ?� t� 2J Stf�'�aJ� �.'�- ' .(r��.�� -� 1 � 1, '� �, yl �, _ I .. � . y ; �� ;.. ` �e�'�'��•...ti ° �: N;i� ,1?. � t ` t ( • ' . 1 1 � 1. � N� 5 � � � if''!°�.t+ �, ; � � . _ .. . ` , f - �. l t �� p ` � ? . `4 z � 'A Z• � �� _'':^_%s• . ��.. V _ 4 ` ELY �,` , ',f � � .� � �: ��r'�`'• \ ' ,� • �, ,. ' ` . t� 14 7`;L rr.•.r Q 33 � =2/ fJ22 / 2MI /9I U�/►�Kiif Ni.�� w� � .0 � �.v4��t..:�:.(��¢ .�'� �, 1' � ' 1 { . � .�l ' � ru 1�� . r3 _�.. .\ `., . S � i �i�.��, :� � vf � � i ,�ta 1�.�. . +' � � � ti ��2; � I i '`; �^ y� ;y, .._ :, 6•~:, It�ia�u�srs�'rre�.a.� 1� 3l'J.' _ �r, ` y M,',} • '�Z� ` ``f,4 , ?' � ' ' I '`•� � �� .I.,I�..I.f I ,4Y `..;•.,, �,4��s.1�\N � My N��,�ty N! � 1 1. -s ! f t .i n1 :-.ep� r•+"�� .,� 7 =� 5 n I� r� S '� . . �'f)!yN �' , �'�fµ �! '' • � '( i+"" ! i � ' f � !/ . _ �j �� j� S '` `� ��,?`r �'it' 1 2. �r�� '� `, r t ti- _ f . vF 0 •o- � . _ . . . - � � . � R�1� . • � : �i` lT `� .C.. �,� :�'• f"r.�„ I � ! i � � �,��!} •`i � ; : 3 � � .v. �. J�' .S� .` � y ��y\7��A ! 2I) I !f 18 D!i�'/I � lG �� . � • Q � � � / T l � t� J'L 7 S I9'.Y��ii�/. ��3�� . r � j � i • tr �,4:' s�'i� `3, 4' � �_I_�. .I�� ',1. ��aM.�y t �1 �,s � �,• ' , . ,�L11124 � � �. ; ;HV r. '..:. _ . i.t �t a "��}'v� ... �i, re �. � _ � �,,� . �, �.t; t. � � ,; '„_,. s�� .\` '� ��' '9 =0 '� � , �, �s 3�� ° LiBERTY ' •✓"':r �'� { , \ �7r)�j� �o, v �,,p,4j �'� �� i.'oN' > > ' „"li \'� �• �! } � �!i!� i V a.`��; " t'` h r�'� 1.. ' n. N 13 � 1 .. �� $� � 2 � _� x� t - � 11 ` , � � .. • I . 9 ,`R ,�r+•�� arre rH� l��sr ef�8f3 !�! 31iu:, - f 3 .S /�I �0!,0"` 4J'1+I-1. �� . �� ' � jJI �. t'sr N. �•`� � � 1 ,``;,� =.i „ '�• .;•;' " � �r�, 1, „ .I. � f � �.� �� S .. _��'� _- = f a 1 ru,�'" ,�,tj � � .!_ '.`. .�. i 'y.�. h \. ` ,. ""��J i t� � �s,a ��w \ _ ,• •„ '� � =x,'?�� .� • , i 1 : I , I" ' � '� � � `, � a . , � �'�:� � t �i I � // �/1 3 i <'/S'/6 %1 �/p . �f • ', ��. �•_ 9'L �i�� ,�. ftj0. `' ��, ♦ t L 7 i i f i� /i ( Kf/l�N;�s �i7�/CU z 1+ � r � '6 • ,� ,,� � 1 j ` � � � s � � f � I . ( s /� `�� .�,. ,�,it�ei,l .� •'�• \� � ..�'�' � `s`,`rs* � I � ' I,I ( �f � 3_�" �11:.�. •� in �ul � �.�..i , � GKE. . , , . '� nt,' ; f : G ' . , ,`u ;,;9 , • • g r ,. . .. . � _ � ' . , � .. � �i � : Z�,�i��'� 1 :,,•,�; t`� •,s':N�'f` '� � '�".t J:3 L�yGFELLO�Y ' �°. : • .. , ;. � . •� - - it rfr `� ',` \j�l ��sf' .��C. ._t'��:•1�� .H._i .�. �i. ' 'I' • o �/ �,�� • . . .. .. . .. , t�. .fr `� .•�j� �' '�' -ox�••=.�� i. � � . �. .`�' �•_ 2 .`' �.- � ,�� ' �,1. ' �• _ ,�� I� � ! �2, : ' ; r , : I � _ • 9 �� '� \iril• ., � - �, n'�.\ ��• � ' ��s - •. �_ yze � 3 t d 77,3= �3�As3/-70mt1':f�Zt'• Y7 ��`1� � �� •33.: � - 11. . - .'�'c;sG i9'rZi. ;7P 71 ��t3 i1b�/sL /7{'/ / Y � k , I i ` 4 .. < O �' - �f/Ii��l ` ' � , � I 1 � 1 ( f t i I 1 ' ��Q .i •� ' *"',�, • �p ��Al, y. . �., � r�`4 `, '\ �� ,r �. v� . j � . �a O ��.�.� .f • i. ��«2/ �� : Si iz��. $ 8 r1�J illlft � 1 .�;�_ ��.r �c ; . .'. y�� .• . �. �.�� a 20 • \ �� •- ' -; ;�1,. �, l, : =�eL� _\�� , `��••�-i i i-i- °1 m� �•�-�-k ��'-i ..I_: I. � -, . \ .. �2 4� l. ' e . G i. s�i 1 i ; ' 9 •� 7.s. � \' � n Je -. " ' 1�.��0�9'� `r` . �}4/ I2�3IIIJ�L;f BI9�ro�ii /2�d� 2 / 23j� i�f�i�l�jl)f �e iiii2l��ly�r♦ �. Y \ �a � : B : ; r'es• t y f qt13 Z,`, ' P u, „ \ ` l � � L _ I � .»� y'k. %G7'�. � :; °� 2.I-1�'i � t � ' 1I a..�.f 9j �.:,, i _ �'.. +T' _.- � 'b`_ i \ � ` '�1��: • • : � o � . , �t ,. _ N _ . ?.- r - �1.. �, Y;=`— • � �� , � 2•. � �� . c • �c-- �s '�G � ^,'+ •t2'� 'Ii ` Io .,.Z� ;• s.: "'�� . .. ..n, . .:"pef..�� .a uf� �t� � f0 ' Z d 10 1� ... �r nn n�r. ...,..,r . • . 9q 'e �`/ 9�kA, Zs i9 • � �,�.� r a� C'-' .. yi��r.Ir � - �.!''� S . •�i� • � ♦ \ � . � u�� j. .s /! 2/• i •� � • i r . � � s x �' � • � ..��: � • C� l �i � � 1� , if I 1/ :� y.r',r` ' � .�a . .y � ��r++< � j .O� � , l • li •� .! . :o • Y • • �f `` � . , �,. a. .s y = , `ap�* � ' 4� _ y- �' =- � � , • !e i iJ • �/ � � 1 � �� if �i \ � r • `2£ � `1 ° ` %y � e 2= 11 �� i• � � G� � / �a ~� a i J .�'' i ' so � ; N � ' 1 ,� i - �p� '' �. y z O . . � � y . _ /t \z:. r , i 'Q► " a �'s Q '�'' y f ' ' • ,`r � V 7 �c 7 .t i \ • � `� � ''~ �{ . � • '� °. !� �� .;Ze � � �. t / . !.•' � . , ,� A.,nj� �, � � � ,� - ,� :�� / \� � �: 1 ;a, � (� j s , ....�t �., _ »y' .1�. �+ . ' . . . . � . � . . \ � �` ' p� r -.�.._ �� . - .� « � �� .� � �,. ,, : , �. ,. � , } ��, � i � r .� t. ' r � - •,:i_ ttt�� T� p'' •� r ,t �� a/i a � i�► � ' .,� `�� , . "`� �P A . . ,,� -" '=,, .,�..F"- " �� ,' � ' . ° `s °� ,�;' 9 ''� \ �' � '� ; ��.• P`�� ,..� �9s+� �� . `� '•' .;; , � �`, '��,, � st . '` �y �' ; _S \ . • '�\ : �-' .. � 0 :•� y :'�' � � �` r . . . . \'.��s t1 � .9 � �u � / � '9 �,, .,�r. r , .,\ �� • �O i `,` i �' ` . '..:. /' �� f' • n . � . . �� ' . �� ' jr/ a Fif� / • / `� ' ��'��+ y r �', l I � • "^ '• s E J� ` � 1 „ � ♦ �.O. � f ��;1 � � � � ��<,� ';� ��j.. �� O � . • � e � � . � r . �- . - - � • b ' �`` � � Q �":. � 5 y - � {�,-, ... . ,. . OG _ . . , � • • �� s ti F . � t ' r;'.. � �• • � `� _ ;�. - � ��. 4 \ y . � � . r � � . . . � . . . � . :' �a . . + � � � •� +��, ,I �,: .. . � - � � �\ � � sS. ----------��^�---f' --.-t'-- '-y 1'^:�. C/i�Y 0�= f ��/v� � y . . • � ' � L.S. ��68-11 2� �. � • L. 2, B1. 1, Spring Va11ey Addition � (S2 Sec: 13) ' �� Leroy B. Smith � � .:� ENTE _� £c. i.�� I�� U�_ '" ' h1f-SSISSI#'PI ST: - - il4: - -.sr�-. ._. ...- ., -- s,.�..c � ----------- - -fj �.., �-...'^.-�.o,=-'-�s3'r-'i; —`:,- R -- — ' q : £ af17 ./ls /2S� /1f �J /JS /Ii /Lf .'lf. �t r . . : : S�.S� Z . ' . �I.ffej �/T [O� � • , ^ �6 1i � � � � `,; M NoJ Jes1_;� „ w� I � . 3: ^ fim� ' I ., /s •, �✓e..rJ� (Bo) 1 . . .h N • '�lN/ . . N . N w �J� �� 9 7 ..% � .AYitf-ow •. '� I A� I% � �. . �. . . J a/t�iN!'�' � � iol . � J•1i j3�_1s1 - �' (60) ° � ' . �_ " N0.88 ; �B � , � rs3� 3 I - ��i� �; �e�,�, f;`y' ' � ,rs�,.. �,ts�..rt. ! S . � Br�n�.an . -- ' . JiLs�ij 6! � � • iT�Oi � . �a.;' � �Bo� � � /9 � N� '1. Oo� Ors .,e,.li . � : ' (,lss� 2 � flt � i/f �Z � O fj ¢ � ,. � eSeysMe . , U ./ico:rt.: � ^ �O . ��eJ (1s�1 � '' �L OaMrn:i w . . a y i �. i� �✓ � j � SZ �+� � � � � W 1 1 S:� ss-, �''� �+ ys» /zs i�s irr . i !�. �:s izt 7l• w' ,r� � '_�_�,�/�)� 3,.,, �� 1TH + � --T=�-- � �j/q/�j•J �iD�. . � � A1 E. N E� , • ,�__ :�E_ . �'�V W Yy � ; ' ' 3)f�.�ro ` M '' � /lJ. /If � , � iSf /o� fe 1l / /1f � , .. ! 3° . . . � . 2 . �ti - 5 rs , -� 1 !� . � \ G�oo> (3�J � a) , I �i�) �' o,=: .;a . .f�.z – — � r�%� `� ,�=�� ,�� rre:� � _ ,a, . :��" �ti,Y. :w � �- G�l i3 �� i 9 7� 5 I`"�� j1 0' �a�e � ° •'`t i L � � i (/S•s, :�¢' (/ssoJ ;, � � I ; ^n � � ' _. e' a z ^� �•Oo �� ii� : •i I � � � );,� � : ' , Q � � � ^ s3rc� � � �! I ', � : , . . � �� r o . `�. /% , _ . �` �' uz � �ii1 � T6e+�� `;�� , ; y s�t� '�"'� { � � I I � �. :�:�� .W.//s�G... � ' r . � � `' ` •i '` i I I � !tl4� ` C1zi (jssJ `_ � ouT:OT / �i � a /�'"-'• i �. �` . w r ' 3„yR�' � � �. ti , � � � � . � � .A•r�a;7[ � 1il.�. /i/il ! `�_J c ; � t� . --- _ sic+� 8 /4 ?"' '!2'• /i✓ '� I 6 `f c /t•:r,e �iri4.�,r, x;;r� ,r. `v , � � . � � Hior...a � H,aw i•w.:�r O �.�"' �.z �-- � � J0 � R' ; /9 _ __'• � ; . .�5 • � � 37crs n I itf i+./ ;' I � ii is I n sr � 1if.li ss .� ._......... .. _Sltn. a t : . �iit - � _ _zJle f•� � � ! �- � --- �L � —:-�=��----Fr�eE CREElf-- RO�D ,� - �4S�;,��tjv�� .-�vo:s �� --- ^ , �" , � �r � ,;G7v,^� ADb." ' ' _r �• �• /ur /s� y� I. `� ^ Cssr� �� j �. � 3O �C , � / • �`._ �� __� Of�oJ .2 , �e //oq' � ` � � /iT� ��) � � I"' y hKcw//n i ♦ � Q.' i OKns,X ` r"'. .. �:� ��o�� Zis�7 ' f,zo�s) � ia 4 Ni 1'v> 1 �ti - � y Gn� 1. t ��..�r: C °',i (6 (5 � � ' � = i } � .�-� , � Z F../e �a7+ $ ' � i . ;+/ Q. l � • ", • = zs b ��tr_. _i • � i E,i� '' ._i� � = 24 7 f ? yr /1� t E c � • f: Hi�,Y-k!.%ar� ? (�asoJ � g ; �: ; � A if'w(/s� - . • /� . i � ! - ''' � 3ss__�, __�! ik� '.� '"T ' � i� •9 ! `iL � .."' —'__ . e � � f � . : � /O , � �' " � c 19 • .. •� ,�,�e� . �� ! _ . ; . . . .. � .� --�' .ti,�,. cy ii . . , � !! � } �.rna �t r�q ;� Z , ! . . j �p� '._ ----- ___.._ --- � �� /3 : i ; �. 4 � , �s.�� .: ZO � I �!Y • ,',, �• Q- • �6,. `_ /, ; - — — � �sao; _ ; �. � - � q�?leoJ �jtJ /r�l 'O � ,71.•' � �� . (10oc� � . j �.�.� . i ..� . � I � �//��q/1F . l .. � . -U ��VDI �I.. - � � � � � � .. ��Q. v � � • . . . . ' •� ' � ' i �e°°� � I� �wr i '. �2 h ie � .w i.. ei J �� : �. � ;.��:s•.;� b°.i� z 3 GAri� S:� 6 : �,�o i � . „ ,� , � ,. , � � . � �; ;,� „ �. < <� :� � ,,�. o i � a5` � ;� w�ppY Lp,• _,....�:�,; . � J � � v��i� � � Q � l�? :+ s"� � ...._ .. ..,' '"' .a : � � j.i (��o) n pA� :h ��r i ° �~.� _ �---'_ Q' v , , S , � y 3,I�� `:� .` .''„ B � • ' : , ;i 2 ,•,�., ' i --��t . ��ri ..•'+ : ._s_�._!� � ��'i.. a�' , .s z �...r�..c ��.o,� • c iie'' ,�:a �,rR - - - � � � 21 PLANNING GOMMISSION MEETING (INFORMAL DISCUSSION) JUNE 20, 1968 The informal dlscussion of the review change in Planned Development, Z0A #66-16 by Camco, Inc. convened at 9:00 P.M. in the Conference Room with the following members present, Hughes, Erickson, Jensen, Myhra, �Ylinen and Engineering Assistant Clark. The following list.is for consideration by the requestors: 1. Need accurate drawing showing River Road width and a proposal� for the appropriate sidewalk and turn lane dedications. Guidelines: Want sufficient space for left and right turn lanes .(with stacking space) for commercial area. n Want sufficient space�for snow storage and sid�ewalk the full leng�h of the tract (commercial and residential). n 2. Need accurate drawings of the plan for the entire tract (commercial'and residential). 3. Need request for rezoning of areas not now in P.D. area. • 4. Need a revision of the plan for street access at Southeast coxner to pnovide more stacking space. 5. Need building design for the commercial building to show compatibility with new apartment building. . 6. Exterior appearance seems to lack tying into the site. � Need to reconsider overall appearance. u 0 � MEMO T0: MEMO FROM: MEMO DATE : Planning Commission Members Nasim M. Qureshi, City Engineer-Director of Public Works June 25, 1968 MEMO NUMBER: 102 Misc. �68-22 RE: Proposed Revised Sign Ordinance A Sign Ordinance is as important to City planning as a Zoning Ordinance. They both play an important part in the appearance and reputa- tion of a municipality. The object of both Ordinances is not to stifle the City's growth, but to make use of its assets in the best possible way. Attached to this letter is a proposed Sign Ordinance, which is an extraction from Ordinances of other suburban Communities such as � Edina, Richfield and our own. The object of this Ordinance is to xegulate more carefully the haphazard erection of signs. Up to now, there are very few restrictions as to number, size or location, wh3ch has resulted in a disorderly and indiscriminate use of signs. Very little afitention has been given to the public safety in regard to annoying or distracting.types of signs which misuse the privileges of the visual communicative media. � The provisions of this Ordinance are intended to encourage creativity by specifying limits in each zoning district, making it essen- tial to maximize the effectiveness of the means of communication allowed. This is done�by giving a reasonable degree of freedom of expression to the communicator, while at the same time respecting the rights of the . receiver of the communication. The accompanying proposed Ordinance is an attempt to reach these goals through a combination of comprehensive standards and practical objectives. We would appreciate your review and recommendations as soon as possible. S�bmitted by ' � �z-�-�-1 � � � NASIM M. QURESHI, P.E. , City Engineer-Director of Public Works Prepared by: Peter J. Herlofsky Nasim M. Qureshi CC: City Council i�1 City Manager 22 � THE MINUTES OF TI3E BOARD OF A�'PEAI,S MEETING OF �JUNE 26 ,°8 968 � The Meeting was called to order by Chairm�..n Ylinen. MENIBERS PR.F�ENT: Yl.ine.n, Mittelstadt, 0°Bannon, Ahonen- MII�ERS ABSENT s Minish OTHER.S PR.ESENT: John Breher9 Building Off°icial MOTION by Mittelstadt to ame.r.d the mir,.utes of the Jun.e 12 , 1 g68 Bo�,rd of Appeal� Meeting9 Item 2, Paragraph 5, to read as iollows: MOTION b,y Mittelstadt to aceept the variance as the fact the garage and its loeation is existin�, it does not obstruct traffic an3 it is an improvement to the �ropert,y . 9 and to accept the remainder oi the m.inutes. Seconded by Ahonen. Upon a voice vote9 there being no nays, the motion carried unanimou�lye ' 10 REQ,IIEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 45m23 FOR RIDUCTION OF SIJ��Y9RDS FROM 10 FEET i0 6 FEET 7 INCHES AND 7 FEET 5 INCHES TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF �.N ADDITION TO THE EXISTING STRUCTURE ON LOT 22 BLOCK 22 HYDE PARK ADDI'��QN 911TOKA COIINTY MZNNESCTA THE SAME BEING 5825 2� STREEI' NoEo, FRIDLEY, MINAiE�OTAo� REQ�EST BY CHARLES R � LINDBERG9 5825 2� SZREEP NoEo, FRIDLEY9 MINNESOTA, � Mro Charles Lindberg spoke on his own behalf. MOTION by Mittelstadt to allow a 5°0'Y setback on the South sideyard and the North sideyard setback remain the same as the existing strueture9 tl�at Mr. L�.n.tiberg acquire a w�itten release from Mrs, Malm residing at 5821 2� Street N.E,, for a cha.nge in the sideyard setback irom the pr•oposed 7'Soa to 5D0" on the South lot 13ne. Seconded by Ahoneno Upo.r� a voice vote9 there being no nays9 the motio.n carrled unat�.imously. �� • � i�a� The Meeting adjourned at 8:10 P,M, Respectfully submitted, John Breher Building Oificial