Loading...
PL 02/22/1968 - 30122� r �, CONJMITTEE ON ORDINANCE REVIEW -- MINUTES OF 2/22/68 MEETING PAGE 1 The Planning Cou�ission, meeting as a committee of the whole, met at 7:30 P.M. N�ERS PRESENT: Hughes, Jensen, Erickson, Myhra MEHIBER ABSENT: Ylinen The methods to be uaed in pursuing the study of the new Zoning Code were discusaed. T'he members agreed on the objective to have a new Code ready to reco�end for adoption by the end of 1968. The following schedule was adopted. Complete First Draft Discuss draft with Council and provide copies to Council for review Review, rework, and incorporate comments from various sources Attorney provide 1ega1 polish and put in form suitable for adoption Final Review by Commission Final Draft to Council with recommendation to adopt May 1, 1968 June 15, 1968 Sept. 15, 1968 Nov. 15, 1968 Nov. 15, 1968 In order to meet the May 1, 1968 deadline set for a first draft, the me�mbers estimated that 12 three hour sessiona will be needed. The members agreed to meet each Saturday from 10:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. Additionally, the members agreed to devote the monthly study meetings of the Planning Co�ission to this purpose. The membera discusaed Sections 1 through 3 of the rough draft of the new Zoning Code as provided by the City Attorney, reviewing the work already done by the Planning Co�isaion at its regular meetings. Section 5"R-1 ONE FANNULY DWELLING" was then discussed in detail. The following decisions were agreed upon. 5ection 1 now appears to be ready. Section 2 should be left until the end of our first time through the entire code, at which time we will rework for the final items and coa- sistency of wording throughout. Section 3 needs further full diacussion on 3.5 and 3.6, with the City Attorney. If thia material is in Chapter 46, do we need more than a reference noting such at this spot? We need information for 3.7 regarding our present nuisance ordinance, and about standards for enforce- ment. For 3.8 (13a and b) do we simply have a reference to our sign ordinance? Should 3.8 (1 and 2) be included at this point. For 3.9 do we simply make reference to land alterations found Committee on Ordinance Review -- 2/22/68 Pa e 2 elsewhere? A quest3on of precedence regarding present Chapter 45, ^ 53 and 54 has arisen because of apparent contradictions. Section 4 seems okey presently. Section 5 has not been completed. See many changes as noted in Chairman Hughes' working copy. We begin next time at "front yard require- ments" for which Bi11 Jensen w311 work out phrasing. The members agreed that the '"USES PERMITEDm section of Section 5 should be reviewed in light of work done previously by the Planning Commission. Chairman Hughes agreed to secure copies of that ma.terial. The next meeting of the committee will be at 10:00 A.M. on February 24, 1968. The meeting adjourned at 12:30 A.M. � �