PL 03/28/1968 - 30129�
��r
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - MARCH 28, 1968
PAGE 1
The meeting was called to order at 7:35 P.M. by Chairman Hughes.
ROLL CALL:
- Members Present: Myhra, Jensen, Hughes, Erickson
Member Absent: Ylinen
Others Present: Engineering Assistant Darrel Clark
A�P�tOVE PLANNING COI�IISSION NfINUTES : MA,RCH'14, 1968 ;
Mr. Jensen asked that tlie following correction be made on Page 7, the
last sentence of the fourth paragraph from the bottom and instead of being
'4aould be honored" should read "was being considered".
Mr. Erickson suggested a correction in the motion at the bottom of Page 7,
the last sentence should read "to consider the question of rezoning" instead
of "reconsider the question of rezoning".
MOTION by Erickson, seconded by�Myhra, that the Planning Commission Minutes
of March 14, 1968 be approved as amended above. Upon a voice vote, all voting
^ aye, the motion carried unanimously.
ACCEPT MINUTES OF COMMITTEE ON ORDINANCE REVIEW: MARCH 2, 1968:
MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Erickson, that the Planning Commission accept
the minutes of the Committee on Ordinance Review of March 2, 1968. Upon a
voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
ACCEPT MINUTES OF COMMITTEE ON ORDINANCE REVIEW: MARCH 23, 1968:
MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Erickson, that the Planning Co�ission accept
the minutes of the Committee on Ordinance Review of March 23, 1968. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVE MINUTES OF BOARD OF APPEf+LS: MARCH 6, 1968:
MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commission receive
the minutes of the Board of Appeals of March 6, 1968. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVE MINUTES OF BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL: MARCH 13, 1968:
MOTION by Erickson, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Couunission
receive the minutes of the Building Standards-Design Control meeting of
March 13, i968. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried
^ unanimously.
Plannin� Co�ission Meetin� - March 28, 1968 Pa�e 2
RECEIVE MINUTES OF BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL: MARCH 27, 1968:
r"1 MOTION by Erickson, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commission
receive the minutes of the Building Standards-Design Control of March 27,
1968. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVE MINUTES OF SPECIAL PARKS & RECREATION CON3MISSION MEETING: MARCH 18, 1968:
MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Co�nission receive
the minutes of the Special Parks & Recreation Co�ission meeting of March 18,
_• 1968. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVE MLNUTES OF PARKS & RECREATION COI�IISSION MEETING: MARCH 25, 1968:
�� MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Myhra, that the Plar�ning CouIInission receive
the minutes of the Parks & Recreation Co�ission meeting of March 25, 1968.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVE MINUTES OF SPECIAL PARKS & RECREATIOAT COMMISSION MEETING: MARCH 25, 1968_;
MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Couuaission recei.ve
the minutes of Special Parks & Recreation Commission meeting of March 25,
1968. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
. ORDER OF AGENDA•
The Commission decided to take the Items in the following order: Items
�'� . 2, 3 and 1 and 4. �
1. CONTINUFD REZONING REQUEST: ZO�.��68-04, LOUIS MOMCHILOVICH: South 150 feet
front and rear of Lot 9, Auditox's Subdivision ��88. Rezone from R-1 to
multiple.
The Engineering Assistant told the Co�ission there were no recorded
easements as far as the City was concerned. There is a 15 foot private
easement across the West end and the watermain and sewer lines are on.
Mr. Momchilovich's property without easement to the City. The lot to the
North has deeded some property and the lot iron is on that corner rather
than Mr. Momchilovich's property.
Mr. Momchilovich wondered i£ the City planned to take the service lane
all the way through to Mississippi. Street, but Mr. Jens�n said it would
not be in a straight line and there has never been a continued sexvice road
along the Highway up to Mississippi Street.
Mx. Myhxa asked that, if the petitioner were to give a 30 foot easement,
what would be the size of the apartments he could build. The Engineering
Assistant replied in R-3, 8 units and in R-3A, 7 units. Mr. Myhra asked
where the approach that goes onto the highway is located. Mr. Momchilovich
answered that if the approach wexe to continue straight East, it would be
on his property. - ,•
��"� In answer to Mr. Jensen's question, Mr. Momchilovich said he would object
- • to dedicating a 30 foot easement, as it might push his setback line bacic
further than the buildings South of him. The way the service lane is now,
if he would dedicate 30 feet, there would be a 20 foot jog into his property.
Planning Commission Meeting - March 28, 1968 Page 3
Mr. Momchiloeich asked if there were any plans for a street and was told
� that there were no specific plans for a street, but there is nothing to
I� prevent the Highwaq Department closing their right of way.
� Another question Mr. Momchilovich asked was if it would be O.K. for him
to build in line with the apartments, or he would be willing to put the
building wherever the Planning Commission would suggest. Chairman Hughes
� informed him that if he.should dispose of the property, the new owner would
not be bound by what he had agreed to.
Mr. Jensen reminded Mr. Momchilovich that if this rezoning were granted,
the value of that property would increase the value of the square footage
of the land involved.
MOTION by Er�ckson, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commission
�� recommend approval of ZOA �68-04, Louis Momchilovich, being the South 150
feet front and rear of Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision ��88 to be rezoned ,
from R-1 to multiple dwelling, subject to the dedication of the West 30 feet
for service drive purposes and reco�aend that there be no waiver of land
area requirements as they relate to the number of units that can be built
on the property. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried
unanimously.
Mr. Momchilovich asked if he had a certain length of time and was told
this item will be before the Council two weeks from Monday (April 15th).
He can go before the Council and present his arguments against the.Planning
Coamnission xecommendation of densities.
��
Mr. Erickson reminded Mr. Momchilovich he was giving up, in one sense,
and gaining in another. He had until the public hearing before the Council
to plead his case. Council can uphold the Planning Commission recommenda-
tion or tuxn it down flatly. The decision of the Planning Commission was to
recommend approval of the rezoning subject to dedication of the Westerly
30 feet of the tract for service road purposes to R-3A. The main portion of
the recommendation was no waiver of land area requirements for the number of
units he is having.
2. CONTINUED REZOIVING REQUEST: ZOA �68-03, ARO INDUSTRIES INC : Lots 1, 2 and
3A Second Revision Auditor's Subdivision ��21 and Lot 1, Brookview Addition.
Rezone from R-1 to R-3A.
Mr. Jacob Aro and Mr. Stanley Guzik were present. An informal discussion
was in order and no decisions were made.
3. CONTINUED LOT SPLIT REQUEST: 'L.S. ��68-04, LARRY DEAN FERGUSON: Lot 21,
Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside. -
The Engineering Assistant showed the certificate of survey which Mr.
Fexguson had brought in. The easements shown on the certificate were to
be drawn up. The easement for utilities in the center of the lot would be
drawn for 10 feet. �
MOTION by Erickson, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commission recom-.
� . mend the Lot Split �68-04, Larry Dean Ferguson, Lot 21, Block 2, Spring Lake
Park Lakeside subject to providing the City with a 10 foot drainage easement
centered on the Noxth line of the South parcel and a 25 foot easement along
the South line for road purposes. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the
motion carried unanimously.
.�.W
Planning Commission Meeting - March 28, 1968 Pa�e 4
4. REZONING REQUEST: ZOA ��68-07, JAMES L ADAMS REPRESENTED BY ANDREW HOHN:
^ SW� of SW� of Section 2.Rezone from M-2 to R-4.
MOTION by Erickson, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Couunission confirm.
the public hearing date of April 11, 1968 for the rezoning request, ZOA �,�68-07,
James L. Adams, represented by Andrew Hohn, of the SW� of SW'� of Section 2
from M-2 to R-4. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried
unanimously. •
ADJOURI�IIKENT •
MOTION by Myhza, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commission adjourn
the meeting at 9:45 P.M. and reeonvene in the Conference Hall to continue the
�� study of the Proposed Zoning Code. Upon a voice vote, aIl voting aye, the
motion carried unanimously. ,
Respectfully submitted
Hazel 0'Brian
Recording Secretary
,�
��`1
COMMITTEE ON ORDINANCE REVIEW - MINUTES OF THtJRSDAY, MARCH 28, 1968
�
The Planning Commission, meeting as a Committee of the Whole, met at 9:30 P.M.
in the Conference Room at City Hall.
Members Present: Hughes, Erickson, Jensen, Myhra
Member Absent: Ylinen
(Continuation of New Section 7 R-3 Limited Multiple Dwelling
R-5 Multiple Dwelling)
Delete Article 11 concerning "extension of a use into a district where boundary
puts lot into more than one district."
Consider moving Article 13 to Section 3 or in the Special Use Permits, Section
45.19.
II. Requirements on Lot Dimensions
R-3 A. Lot Area Requirements
(The phrase "consisting of 8 dwelling units or less " to be added
to I, A, 2 Multiple Dwellings.)
A lot area of not less than 15,000 square feet for building with up
ta 4 units, 3,000 square feet shall be required for each additional
� unit.
R-5 - Minimu.m lot area of not less than 27,500 square feet, with 2500
square feet per unit.
(A question exists about the difference between the R-3 8 unit at
27,000 square feet and the R-5 11 unit at 27,500 square feet.)
Note: We need to add in the Principal Use - position of R-3 and R-5 a
statement indicating that lot dimensions requirements of lower density districts
apply when built in these districts.
B. Lot Width Requirements
• R-3 A minimum lot or parcel width of not less than 85 feet is
required for each building.
R-5 A minimum lot or parcel width not less than 100 feet is required
for each building. �
Delete rest of present 45-29.
��
e