PL 10/18/1972 - 7431� � . ` , . C�� �-�---E.
. �
A G E N D A
PLANNI�TG COMNII.SSION MEETING OCTOBER 18, 1972 8:00 P.M.
, CALL T� ORDER. PAGE
� ROLL C L:
�
APPROV�E PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: OCTOBER 4, 1972. 1-8
---�
1: LO�f SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. ��72-09, BY EAST RANCH ESTATES 2ND ADDITION:
� t�o� 4, Block 2, East Ranch Estates Second Addition. 9
[
-2. _C0�4'LETE REVIEW OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF FRIDLEY:
� , .
�
�
,
, .,
:
; ', .
�:
�
;
,
�
A G E N D A
PLANNING CO1�ffSSION MEETING OCTOBER 18, 1972 8c00 P.M.
.
CALL TO.ORDER: PAGE
ROLL CALL:
1. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. ��72-09, BY EAST RANCH ESTATES ZND ADDITION:
Lot 4, Block 2, East Ranch Estates Second Addition.
2._ _COMPLETE REVIEW OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF FRIDLEY:
�%�.�.e.-�.�,F�/''�' �' ��*" f
� � �� +`�` �
�- _ �
� r ' �
���
i �
.•
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
CIT'Y OF FRLDLEY
OCTOBER 4, 1972
PAGE 1
CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Erickson at 8:00 P.M.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Minish,
Members Absent: None
Others Present: Darrel
Zeglen, Erickson, Fitzpatrick, Schmedeke
Clark, Community Development Administrator
ApPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: SEPTEMBER 6, 1972
Chairman Erickson requested the following corrections be made:
pn p�ge 3, the last sentence in the second paragraph be deleted; on page 5,
the sixth paragraph, strike out the word basement and substitute apartments:
on page 9, the first paragraph after the motion should be deleted. The
second paragraph should begin with "In response to a question by the Chairman
Mr. Clark said--°°".
MOTION by Fitzpatrick, seconded by Minish, that the Planning Commission
minutes of September 6, 1972 be approved subject to the above corrections.
Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
AppgpVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: SEPTEMBER 20, 1972
MOTION by Fitzpatrick, seconded by Minish, that the Planning Commission
minutes of September 20, 1972 be approved. Upon a voice vote, al1 voting aye,
the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVE PLATS & SU]
SEPTEMBER 20� 1972
vTSTnNS-STREETS & UTILITIES SUBCONIlr1ITTEE
MOTION by Zeglen, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planning Commission
receive the minutes of the P1ats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities 5ubcommittee
meeting of September 20, 1972. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion
carried unanimously.
RECEIVE BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: AUGUST 24, 1972
MOTION by Zeglen, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the PZanning Commission
receive the minutes of the Building Standards-Design Control Subcommittee
minutes of August 24, 1972. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion
carried unanimously.
RECEIVE BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES: SEPTEMBER 12, 1972
MOTION by Minish, seconded by Zeglen, that the Planning Commission
receive the minutes of the Board pf Appeals meeting of September 12, I972. Upon
a voice vote, a11 vo�ing aye, the motion carried unanimously.
�
t. �lanning Commission Meeting - October 4, 1972 Page 2-
RECEIVE BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES: SEPTEMBER 26, 1972
MOTION by Minish, seconded by Zeglen, that the Planning Commission receive
the minutes of the Board of Appeals meeting of September 26, 1972. Upon a voice
vote, all votinq aye, the motion carried unanimously.
1. CONTINUED• REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP 4�72-12, BY BLAINE
TION INC.: To build a home for the handicapped on Lot 12, Revised
Subdivision �E10 per City Code 45.051, 3, F.
TRUC-
tor's
Mr. Blaine Edmundson, Mrs. Ruby Anderson, C: R. Tollefson, Mr. and Mrs.
John Gemperle and Mrs. James Gilbertson were present for this item.
Chairman Erickson explained that the Public Hearing was closed at the
last meeting.
Mr. Clark stated the Comanission had a letter before them written to
Mr. Erickson's attenCion containing information about another privately owned
facility for the handicapped in the metropolitan and outlying areas. They
have made an application at Coon Rapids andwere heard by their Planning Com-
mission recently. The application was approved by them. Mr. Clark talked to
Alan Hamel, Zoning Administrator, at Coon Rapids.
He was told the site in Coon Rapids was 39,000 squaxe feet. There are
two structures, each housing about 12 handicapped people and a couple staying
with them. The rear yard of the lot abuts R-1 occupied property. Both sites
are zoned multiple. One site is vacant and the other has a single family
structure, a non-conforming use. Across the street from the site is commercial,
behind is Highway �E10. This would be about 109th Avenue.. The State does license
these occupancies. The one in Coon Rapids will have a two car garage and six
open parking spaces making a total of 8 stalls. The lots are not required to
be fenced, but shrubberies will be planted. They are proposing to put five
more units in a planned development area where there is also a planned home
for the elderly, a day care center and nursing home. They feel that since the
two homes have been approved, if the request for five more units is approved,
it will probably be all they will approve and would make a total capacity of
84 people.
The site in the City of Fridley contains about 30,000 square feet.
The .additional five buildings in Coon Rapids are located in an area where large
strtactures will be. The buildings will be more fitting to the neighbors than
perhaps this one would be.
Chairman Erickson said that he received a call that afternoon from the
petitioner asking that he be permitted to introduce additional testimony. He
informed Mr. Edmundson�that the Hearing was closed and suggested he write up
a brief inemo containing what additional information he would like to interject.
The County does not require a license but the State does. There are
rules and regulations that govern licensing by the State. These are handled
in Coon Rapids by a Special Use Permit.
�
�� Planning Co�ission Meeting - Oc�obe� ��s�, 1972 Page 3
Chairman Erickson said that if the City was not going to license these
homes on the City level. we would not have control. A suggestion was made
to issue the Special Use Permit on an annual basis or whatever period of
time the Com[nission would suggest.
Mr. Minish said his concern was the size of the house which was a
multiple use in single family dwelling areas, what would happen in case the
f acility was closed.
Mr. Clark said the building could probably be used for a boarding
i�ouse.
MOTION by Fitzpatrick, seconded by 5chmedeke, that the Planning Com-
mission reopen the Public Hearing af the 5peciaZ Use Permit, SP #72-12,
by Blaine Constxuction Inc. to enable the petitioners to make their presenta-
tion. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Edmundson said he t�ied to express in this letter in a brief way
what they were trying to say. The large envelope the Com¢nission received
• contains a bill that is going to be presented before the State Legislature.
It is not a final bill at this point. There is a question of including
mental, as well as physical, disability (10-3-72). The Minnesota Governor's
Comm:tssion on Employment of Handicapped Persons feel very definitely that
in some casea both physical handicapped and also the mentally retarded and
aged are being discriminated against in certain locales. Illinois passed
this bill in 1971 and sent it to be used as a pattern for Minnesota.
It seemed many people that they talked to were not against this
facility, but still didn't come to the meeting and speak for it. The
petition was signed by people who live in the immnediate area. Mr. 0'
Loughlin, who was against the petition, has sold his property and the new
property owner has signed this petition. Dr. Gilbertson signed and he is
within 300 feet. Miss Hubbard was here at the last meeting and spoke about
it. These two work with this type of people, are in the know and understand
them. They would not have approved this facility if there was a probability
of danger. Dr. Gilbertson works at Lino Lakes Hospital. The point he was
trying to make was that these people are familiar with the handicapped.
We have here the type of setting that is being looked for.
Mr. Edmundson answered the s�atement "iahy don't you go to Spring Lake
Park or Coon Rapida, why does it �aave to be in Fridley?" by saying that they
feel this is the type of setting these people need. It is also the type of
setting the Welfare wants to see them in. The site is a break between
industrial and resideAtial. What saf er one could they have? At least they
would be in the residential area and this is important to them.
Mr. Fitzpatrick said that he agreed with Mr. Erickson even though
some of the objections raised by the neighbors might border on the discrim-
inatory, but not those of the Planning Com�ssion. The other consideration
of Mrs. Anderson and the property itself -- he felt for her having to remain
burdened with R-1 zoning on that property. She has paid in taxes and assess-
ments $3,200 since her home was destroyed in 1965 according to the letter
subruitted by Mr. Edmundsan. She still owes $2,lOQ in assessments.
,•
�•� Planning Commission Meeting - Octobe�° �, 1972 Page 4
Mr. Minish asked if it would be feasible to reduce the size of the
building.
Mr. Tollefson said that what happens is that the minute you take off
one bedroom you destroy the balance of six and six. You would be down to
eight. It was not feasible. Twelve is a good size. The State allows up to
sixteen. They felt that was too mueh for one couple to do the job.
Mrs. James Gilbertson, 6801 Channel Road: She said that she and her
husband, Dr. Gilbertson, signed the petition both times. She was surprised
at the objections.
Chairman Erickson explained that the reason the Commission delayed
the petition was because of the objections. People expressed their fears,
anxiety and location in the neighborhood. The Co�ission was also concerned
about the fact that they were not sure whether or not the Community or State
had control over this type of operation. They were assured now there is a
State license. �
Mrs. Gilbertson said that Dr. Gilbertson is a clinical psychologist
at the Minnesota Reception and Diagnosis Center located in Lino Lakes.
He has worked with these people. She and her husband felt that these people
do really contribute to the community. They will all be employed and have
jobs up to their ability that will be worthwhile. The Gilbertsons live on
Channel Road and are within 300,feet of the site. They have two children and
she would not fear them at all. As a resident close to the property, she
would not be worried about them, but would be worried more about a drug user
coming into the home.
Chairman Erickson asked Mrs. Gilbertson if this facility were built
right next to her home, she would not object?
She answex'ed that she wouldn't. There is no reason for it. She
thought about it for two days. She would have no objection to this type.
She did not want her decision to be one of those things you get on the band
wagon and then the next day wonder why and get off it. To her it is like a
half way house. Here there is environment, park, work, transportation on
Central Avenue. Ideal. If it was said that they were putting it next to
her home, it would be perfectly all right.
Mr. Kenneth H. Becker, 1380 69th Avenue: He said he also lived on
the same street as the proposed building. He agreed with Mrs. Gilbertson.
If all the apartment buildings on 69th Avenue can be built with all those
people in it, what is another fourteen on the end of the block?
Mr. Schmedeke said his concern was still quite similar to what it
would be if they were near neighbors. He wondered if he were a contractor
and building a lot of homes, if he would build a project like this and be
able to get the same price for homes on either side. He sympathized with
these people and others concerned. His wife does not work with this type
of people and neither understand them. If a situation came up, he did not
know how he would handle it. .
��s. Gilbertson said that was why she was for this petition. Here
we have a�.ha�.�s to pu� �he� i� � cAp�4��ity.
�•� • • _ Pa e 5
Planning ComQni.ssion Meeting Qctober 4, 1972 �
Mx'. Schmedeke said at the last meeting the suggestion was tnade to look
for an area but not in this immediate vicinity.
Mr. Edmund$on said they had looked somewhat, but they were back to the
same thing. The same questions will be asked wherever they go. It should be
in a residential area. 'iiere it is on the borderline. He did not know why it
should make a difference whether or not they put the building here or some
other place. At this point, he could not see how it could be economically
f easible. The house may not be full all the time. The maximum is twelve.
It may be down to eight or ten, It may also take a while to get it up to the
maximum and then again it may dwindle. If you consider getting it to eight,
then you would propose making it even possible to have a second building to
house a total of 16. They would rather leave it at 12.
Mr. Clark said he had asked the same question of Alan Hamel, Coon
Rapids. He thought that services rendered to these people by others or trans-
portation, such as mini-bus, where it is better to have more than 4, 5 or 6
to serve at one location. It is easier to pick up 8, 10 or 12.
Mr. Tollefson said that one of the people contacted around 69th Avenue
has an adult brvther who is re�arded. He is one of those that are kicked
around. He spends a little time at different relatives. This house is for
adults. There is no limit as to how old they have to be or when they have to
move ou�. Some of them may stay for a lifetime.
Mr. Edmundson said he grew up with a fellow who was handicapped -- he
had palsy. He had not seen him for twenty years and got a call recently. This
man was woxking in a place on Lake Street for those with palsy and lived in a
ho� of this type. He said "Blaine, I hear you are a builder. I need some
help. I am getting married. The girl I am marrying also works at Lake Street.
She is handicapped in a different way, so that she can dr.ive a car." He pur-
chased a new trailer house and lives in New Brighton. He wanted a ramp built
as he could not use the steps. When Mr. Edmundson a�ked him if he was working,
the answer was he was so busy that he had been working six days a week. The
proposed housing is the type of program for such a person.
Mr. John Gemperle said that somebody was interested about finances.
Did they know what it costs the County for each resident? $530.00 a month
for every patient they have in Cambridge. In this facility, presuming the
resident is to be accepted, the cost for each is $350.00. There are some
residents in Cambridge that would come down here.
MCJTZON by zeglen, seconded by Sehmedeke, that the Planning Commission
receiv� the following: Letter from Community Living, Inc., Viatoria, Minn.,
da�ed October 3, 1972; from 3tate of Illinois, the Governor's Committee on
.�mployment of the Handicapped; News Release (Date line Chicago, AuguSt 23)
"Goa1s"; State of 111inpis House Bi11 Numbers 2296, 2297, 2298, 2299, all
August 1971; Petition fot the proposed residential Facilities for the Nandi-
capped on Lot 16, Revised Auditor's Subdivision #10 toqether w�th a Ietter
dated October 4, 1972 signed by Blaine Edmundson and Chester R. Tollefson;
and also a bi11 from the Minnesota Governor's Conanission on Employment of
8andicapped Persons. Upon a voice vote, a�l votinq aye, the motion carried
i��?�ir�us�� •
e'
.�•� Planning Commission Me�tin� October 4, 1972 Page 6
MOTION by Fitzpatrick, seconded by Minish, that the Planning Commission
c3bse the Public Hearing of the 5pecial Use Permit� SP #72-12, by Blaine
Constxuction Inc. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried
unanimovsly.
Mr. Fitzpatrick said that the Commission would do well to confine its
discussion to all matters pertinent to the petition other than the character
of the proposed residents. There are many legitimate concerns we might have,
but we should not contit�ue to sit in judgment on the kind of persons who will
live here.
. Mr. minish wondered about the other apartments in the area. Mr. Clark
answered they were speaking of the Roger Larson and Bob McGregor townhouses.
The Larson complex is about one half mile away and the McGregor complex one
quarter mile away.
Chairman Erickson said that if the Council wished to approve this Use,
that a limitation or renewal type be placed on the Special Use Permit so that
the renewal can ba denied or extended.
Mr. Fitzpatrick, referring to the letter from Mr. Edmundson with the
petition attached, said the letter pointed out that one of the two people who
would be living the closest to the proposed house, has since changed hands
and the new ow�er signed the petition with no objection.
Mr. Clark said the plans show a 35 foot setback. The other homes set
back about 75 feet. Chairman Erickson said the Ordinance would not permit
a 35 foot setback w�thout a variance.
Mr. Minish asked if this lot were big enough to split to�allow two
building structures but housing the same number of people.
Mr. Edmundson said there would be a problem getting sewer and water.
The lot to the South is low and they have to get a Special Use Permit to put
in a home sewer and well.
Mrs. Gilbertson said that they are in the process of hooking up to
Fridley's maxveloua sewer system. The cost is astronomical running close to
$5,000. They have �o have a lift station.
Mr. Clark said that if this lot were divided into two structures, they
could be fed by gravity. The next lot South is quite a bit lower and would
require a lift station.
Chairman Erickson said that if this type of operation would be practi-
cal, they would have to have two supervisors.
Mr. Tollefson said the cost would be unbearable.
Mr. Minish said that it'comes back to the desire to locate in a resi-
dential area and yet the structure would be much larger than others in that
area•
Chairman Erick�on c]���ked the floor plans and stated that the building
could be turned into a duplex if the operation were closed for some reason.
.-•
,.. Plannin� Commisaion Meeting - October 4, 1972 Pa�e �
Mr. Fitzpatrick asked if the Special Use Permit were permitted, would
the petitions have to go to another Subcomanittee:
The plans would have to go before the Building Standards-Design Control
Subcom4nittee after Council's approval.
MOTION by Fitzpatrick, seconded by Minish, that the Planninq Comrrtission
recommend to Council approval of the 5pecial Use Permit, SP #72-12, by Blaine
Construction Inc. to build a home for the handicapped on Lot 16, Revised
Auditor's Subdivision #10 per City Code 45.051, 3, F, with the stipulation that
because there is a question of just what kind of building we are dealing with,
that the request does go to the Building 5tandards-Design Control for review
and recoiranendation; that there be an initial period of three years for review
of the Special Use Permit, and annually after that time; that the structure
be in conformance with the proposed 5tate requirements; that the number of
parking stalls be 8; limitation as to occupancy being a maximum of 12 occu-
pants plus two supervisory personnel; that no variance be granted for the
existing setback requirements; that shrubbery be used as screening on the
East lot line, and later provide a fence if felt necessary. Upon a voice vote,
Fitzpatrick, Schmedeke, Erickson, Minish voting aye, Zeglen abstaining, the
motion passed.
2� PUBLIC HEARING• REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP 4�72-13, BY GORDON G.
SWENSON: To construct a building to be used for repair shop, specializing
in brakes under City Code 45.101, B, 3 D at 1010 Osborne Road.
Mr. Gordon Swenson was present.
MOTION by 5chmedeke, seconded by Zeglen, that the Planning Commission
waive the reading of the Public Hearing for a Special Use Permit, SP #72-13,
by Gordon G. S�venson. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried
unanimously.
Mx. Swenson stated that he has the property on Osborne Road and would
like to put up a shop specializing in brakes, pick up and servicing , the
largest vehicle up to 3/4 Ton, tune up work, shop work, but no gasoline. The
building to be designed to look like the present structure next door. All
the entrance doors would be on the rear. It would look very attractive from
the street.
Mr. Clark said the VFW is adjacent to the East and the old Nagel house
to the West.
Mr. Swenson said that he was going out of the grocery business --
two mini-grocery stores on Osborne cannot make a living. If the VFW would
use the back parking lot, they would not have to use his lot.
Mr. Clark said that the zoning was C-2. Prior to 1965 you could build '
comm►ercial an an indnstrial property. After that time industrial buildings
had to be in industrial zoning. The lot meets the minimum requirements for a
�p�ttte�cial lot .
�
:,
Planning Commission Meeting October 4, 1972 _ Page 8
Mr. Swenson said that eventually he would take the Nagel house down
and use one wall of this building as the wall of the next building. The drive-
way between his store and the VFW is his property.
Mr. Clark said the building plans meet the Code.
MOTION by Zeglen, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planning Commission
close the Public Hearing of the Special Use Permit request, 5P #72-13, by
Gordon G. Swenson. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Schmedeke, seconded by Zeglen, that the Planning Corr�nission
recommend to Council approval of the Special Use Permit, SP #72-13, by Gordon
G. Swenson to construct a building to be used for a repair shop specializing
in brakes under City Code 45.101, B, 3 D at 1010 Osborne Road with the garage
doors on the rear of �Che buildinq. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the
motion carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARING• REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT,_SP 4�72-14, BY ERNEST M.
HARPER: To construct a detached second garage to house one car and boat
on Lot 2, Block 1, Rice Creek Plaza North Addition per Code 45.051, 2 A.
Mr. Ernest Harper was present.
MOTION by Fitzpatrick, seconded by Schmedeke, that the Planning Com-
mission waive the reading of the Public Hearing for the 5pecial Use Permit,
SP #?2-14, by Ernest M. Harper. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, �he motion
carried unanimously.
The comm�ent was made by Chairman Erickson that the lot backs up to
industrial property. The existing building is 14.4 feet from the side lines.
� Mr. Harper said that this was the only feasible way to go. He will
give enough for the driveway. He plans to put in a concrete driveway. The
garage will have a hipped roof.
Mr. Clark told Mr. Harper that there is a six foot easement along the
rear of the lot. He would have to stay off that.
MOTION by Minish, seconded by Zeglen, that the Planning Commission
close the Public Hearing of the 5pecial Use Permit, SP #72-14, by Ernest M.
Harper. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Minish, seconded by Schmedeke, that the Planning Commission
recommend to Council approval of the request for a Speaial Use Permit,
SP #72--14 by Ernest M. Harper to construct a detached second garage to house
one car and boat on Lot 2, Block 1, Rice Creek PZaza North Addition per Code
45.OS1, 2 A. Upon a voice vofie, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
l�� � UEQ ST FOR PERMISSION TO PUT A FENCE ACROSS AN
�"`"" p Lot 1, Block 4, City View A
�������� ���� �
I�ti:''Amborn was present.
tion.
BY ROBERT
r
` r
'' Plannint� Commission Meetin� - October 4, 1972 Pa�e 9 I
Mr. Schmedelce explained tha.t the Plats & Subdivisions-Streets &
Utilities Subcommittee asked the four property owaers involved in this problem
to meet with the Subcommittee on September 20, 1972. 7.'hree of the four owners
came and all pre£erred �o have this strip closed. The general feeling of the
Subcommittee was that if it would not be opened for a street, it should be
vacated. Going a step further, they considered the extension of 57� Avenue
between 6th and 7th Streets to allow traffic going South on 4th, Sth and 6th
Streets to make an easier route to 57th Avenue. There are alleys and sub-
streets all over the City of Fridley that he hoped to work on or clean up.
Mr. Clark said that the 33 foot strip would be divided in half.
Mr. Amborn said that he had talked to the neighbor on the West and
they had tried to get the crossing closed because of the mini-bikes, snow-
mobiles and just everything goes through there.
Mr. Clark said that many things were discussed by the Subcommittee.
Mr. Amborn's request was just to fence it off. The Subcouunittee felt it
should be made into a street and vacated. If they did not want a street
there, perhaps a walkway or sidewalk could be the answer. The final decision
was to recommend vacating entirely and divide the easement in half. If Mr.
Amborn wanted to fence it, he should get in touch with Mr. Frank, the owner
on the West side. Fourth Street does connect with 57th Avenue and 57th Place.
Having another intersection that close to one that is also being heavily
travelled might be dangerous.
The Commission wondered, if by closing this easement, they would be
creating a long block. In �he discussion it was pointed out there are many
blocks in the City the same length or longer.
Mr. Amborn said there are not very many young people with families
living between this block and University Avenue. Besides most of the traffic
is coming from the West to the East.
Mr. Sch�nede�.e ca11�d attention to Block 32, Hyde Park Addition saying
it was a good example of the type of clean up wprk he would lilce to see.
MOTION by Schmedeke, seconded by Zeglen, that the Planning Commission
recommend to Council approval of vacating the 33 foot wide extension of Sth
Street between 57th Avenue and 57th P1ace and also to vacate the 33 foot strip
between 37th P1ace and 57th Avenue and that the City retain a 20 foat wide
utili ty easement for the inplace sanitary sewer. Upon a voice vote, a11
voting aye, the motion carried unani.mously.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being nq further business, Chairman Erickson ad'journed the
meeting at 10:15 �'.M.
Respectfully submitted
, ��-,
� .�i �` � ,�,,4,),�,.c�- _
Haz 0`Brian
Recording Secretary
�
�- `
r ,t
Fg�► #5-68
�
.,�
� e �
�d°'o
►7 eya U
�� �
+� .c �d
���
R� 3 0
o ,�
�� ��f t�
.�.' @ O '�
+� ,� +�
4� O m U
° '-� m �
-vw v � �
a�oo
mo�i�
�C �,m�
LOT SPLIT APPLICATION
CITY OF FRIDLEY
APPLICANT: East Ranch Estates II
ADIaRESS: 7620 Universit� Ave. N.E., Frid.Zeg 55432
Street City Zip Code
TELEPHONE # 784-923I 786-6222
Home Busineee
PROPII3TY OWNE�Z( S) Robert Schroer
s Name
Lot Split
➢ate Fi�d: �
Fee:�l� " Receipt # s�.
Council Action:Da�e
RF1�iARI{S :
���5��� 490 Rice Creek BZvd.,, Frir77F+� 45Q39
Street City Zip Code
Street City Zip Code
TII,EPHONE #( S � Same
Home Bueineas
Property Location ox� Street
or F�caet Street Addreas �IF ANY� Univerci ty AcsPnr�a N_F_ .
Legal Deacription of Property:
. . � . r,. _. .
Reason for Lot Split:
. - . .- . .. .
Total Area of Property sq. ft. Preaent Zoning Claeeification Comm.
The undersigned hereby declaxea
reptreeentations atated in this
correct.
DATE: Oct. Z3, 1972 S
BELO� R CITY USE ONI�Y
that all the facts and
application axe true and
(Se� rcveres eide For additionai inatructione}
PLATS & SUBS: Date of Consideration -
Reu�arka :
PLANNING COMIKISSION: Date oi Consideration - '
Rewarka: �
�
CITY COIINCIL: Date of Cox�sideration -
Remarke: I
.
j
.
. 10 OI ' "� ' i �
.� �N .� � � � 'M a a ? � �
� r, o . � . � �
.,.
`+Q � �� cJ x , � �� r i
.y Q_; 8 � � L.S .�72-09 :�obert Schroer a � t �r
�+� �� ,C 1- � L. 4, Block 2, East Ranch Estates•� �� �"
� ' W � � � � ( 2nd Add . � � � , N
_ � ,� (� i: • � i �
� o � +�,, '
;«= � � ---------------� �---- ------ ----- -� �_ao
r d'� � =" 1t .00 433.55 ----�-- �, _- _-
`_� _r N --_�=��gZ�Q-�w---� --- -�----�N.84°�'30"W. -- -----_-
. � ��.�- _-,-�-'�"" � �- - -
. �� __ �__--_._-- j= --�---- �r'Qit�ai�ie � U�i�iiy Easemen�
_ - t u,
_ � i i �
� t-�---- ��3.0
1 � � 1
" O , p i0 �r ! (
t �
�t► ' � °c �tt�'f � p 3
t
.
'a � �° �P'�" DI o �' i p�
ir+
. i iz 3 � � � �
� I ` ` J
�
► � � , �
� � . i �
,; i �
. t� i � ► �
� � � i �
r�
(�l Z��.00 � � � i
� � � . N.S9�S'�30�� r . . A9AA/l� I � . .
�
V � '`� �. � I
,� 1 �
Z, ! ,
�
� � a ;. �
v ' '
�« « .. � �
`� � ,, � � 3
:� ,� 5 p i,
,� ba�
� � � �� o
� 33 ; 33 . � � .,� �
Y� �� � � ;♦ .. . ;. i�. � ..
.« � i I
� � , �� 0 � . I
�
..`} �.i' �p M+�� Norl�+ Su6ur� �ni}� S�v+et' EaSermt� }�
" o
j �° ` --- -------------j�5 ��---------
.� 1' �
. �a: �.
'?'�•� � . . . ..
.�
118�. 4Z
. s : �1.89•� 3o�w
� ��ior► Z,TownshiP 30, Qange 24.
�-, r,
� �� � .
-`�
�
a
s
�
�tQr1r1�4 q�1Qwn af t QgStAlriQd
�
N.
,,
�
� ,+
o� � �
�j i .�
� �w
��
4. ' !,
�
�.Ot7'
.°�
_
: ,c,
z�� �
�-
c�. ��
I 1 v
�' ��
� ---- ��3.0 -..
� � �t ---
��
� _
�
i � ��
--------J2e t -------- --o c
ao�. a� M /�
�r��..� � � ��'� J� : �: r' S' Y,� -7'r /%
� � � C, , t�._ ;,� � r_�S
r''-„�'�(:'7" �� �tf�'1 i ]-��^+�� i
,•�,_� ; � � �L�, , , ��, �
�
CY
�O
� �
�
� o '�
;�
,,�
�f
,�
.�
� s �
� ,
. �
� �
I I� �
I' —
; ,_� _
( ��
I ', ' L
� � � :�
I f ��'
�� � �
� �.�
' � � ��. I
c�
�
�
2���S �;
. ;
F�'
�.;
r�
o'r i
�i �
/ �� ,
� „ra ' �
1�•`�� ' .
— / '
1
. �� l�t3URI�AN'.
�n ,�nt,.�r-r�.�*.,.�, ..�,w
�