The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 03/06/1974 - 74830 ^ A G E N D A PLANNING COMNII5SION MTETING MARCH 6, 1974 � . CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CI�LL : APPROVE PLANNING COrSP•'iTSSION MINUTES: FEBRUARY 20, 1974 RIa�CLTVE PLATS F< SUBDIVISIONS-STREETS & UTILITIES SUB- COMT�'iITTEE MINUTES : I'LBRUARY 2 0, 197 4 RECFIVE BUIL�ING STI�NDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOrSMITTE� MINUTES: F'EBRUI�RY 21, 1974 l. CUNTINUED: PUELIC HEARING: REZONING REQUEST, ��%� #k 74- 0 2, BERKFLEY PUt•1P CUMP��NY : `I'o re zone Lots l and 2, Bloc}� 13, Spring �3r�ok Park Addition, from R-1 (single family dwellinq areas) to M-1 (light industrial are�s) to make zoning consistant with 'property lines at l81 Ely Street N.�. Pub.lic Fiearing open �r �� 8:00 P.M. PAGES 1 - 11 12 - 17 18 - 20 21 CONTINUED: PUBLIC HEZ�RING: kEZONING REQUEST, ZOA See pages $�74--0� r HLNNZI�!G NELSON CONSZ'RUCTION COD'IPANY: �I`O 39-4� rezone Lots 13, 14, 15, 16, Block 2, Riverwood Manor, gebruary 20th from R-1 (single family dwelling areas) to R-3 (general Agenda multiple family dwell.ing areas) to allow construction of a 24 unit apartment comple�: to be located South of 71st Way and West of East River Road. � Public Hearing cl.ased 3. PUBLTC HEI�RII`�G: RE�UEST FOR SPECIAL USE PrRMIT, SP #74-01, BY t-:. R�LPT3 SIiINNER: Per nridley City Coc�� Section �05.Q51, 2, A, to construct a second assessory bui_ld?ng, a sh�d to be used far storage, on Lots 20 aiid 21, Auditor's Subdi.vision No 22, the same being 6217 Central Avenue N.E. 4. �. 5. i �°• 22 - 27 R�ntIFST �'OR A LOT SPLIT, L.S. #74-02, B�RNI�RD 2$ - 30 i7RBICK: S�lif� LoL 39, 1�uditor's Suk�division No. 92, into faur builc�ing sites located at 58th and Arthur Street N . �, . SET' PUBLIC H�ARING D�1TE FOR �1RNfORY PROPOSAI, � � /� ,�� ,�� ' �� . ' , i �� S I ��.-.;�r � 5-1� . � �^ ��G�'�q�9 � � CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 20, 1974 CALL TO ORDER: PAGE 1 Chairman Fitzpatrick called the meeting to order at 8:50 P.M. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Members Absent: Others Present: Fitzpatrick, Drigans, Blair, Lindblad, Harris ' None Darrel Clark, Community Development Administrator APPROVE PLANNING COMMI5SION MINUTES: FEBRUARY 6, 1974 MOTION by Harris, seconded by Lindblad, that the Planning Commission approve the minutes of the meeting of �ebruary 6, 1974 as written. Upon a voice vote, aIl voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. � RECEIVE PARKS & RECREATION CQMMISSION MINUTES: JANUARY 28, 1974 MOTION by B1air, seconded by Drigans, that the Planning J'� Commission receive the minutes of the Parks & Recreation Commission meeting of January 28, 1974. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVE BUILDING STANDARDS-DE5IGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: JANUARY 31, 197� MOTION b� Lindblad, seconded by Blair, that the Planning Commission receive the minutes of the Building Standards-Design Control Subcommitteemeeting of January 31, 1974. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Mr, Harris asked Mr. Lindblad what was meant by "ear�h colors" � on the A1 Z�is buildings? Mr. Lindblad said it referred to the different types of block that would be pa Zted to blend in with the brick, to break up the blank look of the development. RECEIVE BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOn��TTTEE MINUTES:. FEBRUARY �7, 1974 MOTION by Lindblad, sec�nded by Harris, th�z` the Planning Commission receive the minutes of t11e Building S`t:tandards-Design Control Subcommittee meeting of February 7, Z974. Upon a voice vote, aI1 vating aye, the motion carried ur..animousZy. � RECEIVE BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES: FEIIRUARY 7, 1974 MOTION by DriganS, seconded by Blair, that the Planning Commission receive the minutes of the Board of Appeals meeting of � February 7, 1974. Upon a voice vote, aZ1 voting aye, the motion carri�d unanimously. - Plannir�g Commission Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page 2__ � ' RECEIVE PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS-STREETS & UTILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: FEBRUARY 13, 1974 MOTION by Harris, seconded by Driqans, that the Planning � Commission receive the minutes of the Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee meeting of February 23, I974. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. l. CONTINUED: PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING REOUEST, ZOA #74-01, HENNING NELSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY: To rezone Lots 13, 14, ' 15, 16, Block 2, Riverwood Manor, from R-1 (single famiiy dwelling areas) to R-3 (general multiple family dwelling areas) to allow construction of a 24 unit apartment complex generally . located South of 71st Way N.E. and West of East River Road. Public Hearing closed. MOTION by Harris, seconded by Lindblad, that the Planning Commission receive the Ietter from Independent School District 14, dated February 20, 1974. Upon a voice v.ote, all voting .aye, the motion carried unanimously. Chairman Fitzpatrick said he wanted the contents of this letter included in the minutes and he read, as follows: /1 "The letter is address to Edward Fitzpatrick, Chairman of the Planning Commission: At the regular meeting of the Board of Education, District 14, held on February 19, 1974, the following resolution caas introduced by Gordon Sangster: "Whereas the Fridley Planning Commission has received a request to rezone Lots 13, 14, 15, 16, Block 2, Riverwood Manor, from R-1 (single family dwelling areas) to R-3 (general multiple family dwelling areas), Whereas the described property is located across 71st Way Northeast from the entrance to the Riverwood Elementary School, And whereas the increased housing density and attendant traffic could create a safety hazard at the school entrance, Therefor�, be it resolved that the Board of Education of Fridley Independent School District No. 14 requests that the described property be retained with the current R-1 zoning classification." The above resolution was seconded by Mary Schreiner, and the following members vc,ted in favor of the resolution: Raymond Mondloh, Gordon Sangster, Mary Schreiner, Wallace Hlavac and John Meyer. Those voting no: none. Robert Pierce abstained. Because District 14 is an adjacent property holder to the land in question, we would like to ,� ��express our position on the matter. Thank you. Mr. Fitzpatrick said the letter was signed by Mary Schreiner, Clerk of the Board of Education.° Planning Commission Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page 3 ,i^� Mr. Clark said the petitioner, Mr. Reinertson, had left a ' message with the staff saying that he was too ill to attend the meetir�g this evening and asked to have the consideration of the rezoning request continued until March 6th.. MOTION by Blair, seconded by Drigans, that the Planning Commission continue rezoning request, ZOA #74-01, by Henning Nelson Construction Company, to rezone Lots 13, I4, I5, 16, BZock 2, Riverwood Manor, from R-1 (sinqle family dwelling areas) to R-3 (general multiple family dwelZing areas) to a11ow construction of a 24 unit apartment complex generally located South of 71st Way N.E. and West of East River Road, until March 6, 1974 at the petitioner's request. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER.ATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. #74-01, RICE CREEK ESTATES, BY GOODCO, INC., AND PINE TREE BUILDERS: Bring a replat of Part of Lots 9 and 10, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, located between Rice Creek Road and 61st Avenue N.E., and West of Benjamin Street N.E. Mr. Roland Goodroad was present to represent the petitioner. MOTION by Drigans, seconded•by Har.ris, that the Planning Commission waive the reading of the Public Iiearing notice on P.S. #74-01, Rice Creek Estates, by Goodco, Inc., and Pine Tree builders. Upon a voice � vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Clark said the Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee had been given a petit.ion by the neighbors stating that they were in opposition to this preliminary plat, but most of the opposition seemed to be against the extension of 61st Avenue N.E. rather than the entire plat. Chairman Fitzpatrick said they would have to receive the petition as presented. �MOTIDN by Blair, seconded by Lindblad, that the Planning Commission receive petition #3-1974, in opposition to proposed preliminary p1at, P.S. #74-OI, Rice Creek Estates, by Goodco, Inc., and Pine Tree Builders, being a replat of Lot 10, Auditor's Subdivision #22, except the North 260 feet thereof; and Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision #22, except the North 260 feet of the West 132 feet, Iying in the South Half of Section 13, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, Count� of Anoka, Minnesota. Generally located between Rice Creek Road and 61st Avenue N.E. and West of Benjamin Street N.E. Upon a voice vote, a1I voting aye, the motion carried unanimousZy. Mrs. Gloria Arel, 1521 Ferndale Avenue N.E.,�said a different plat was presented at the Plats & Subdivisions meeting this evening, and their opposition was to the extension of 61st Avenue N.E. � Mr. Clark said the first plan presented by the petitioner is the plan that you have in your agenda. According to the comg��:�l��nsive park plan, there is a need for a park in this area, so the Cit�,= =:.�taff dr�w up a modification of this plan, where the City would try t� get some where between two to three acres for a neighborhood park c?�1 this plat. Planning Commission Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page 4 � •One of the big objections to this first plat was that it did not render the Theilmann property to their satisfaction. The Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee told the petitioner to work with the City staff and the Theilmann's to develop a plat that was satisfactory to both. The petitioner brought in a new plan tonight that does not include the Theilmann property. Chairman Fitzpatrick said all the Theilmann property wasn`t included in the first plat. Mr. Clark said it did not include the Theilmann homestead property on which their home is located. Mr. Clark said the p'reliminary plat presented to the Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee before this meeting still had some opposition also. The people living on Ferndale did not want 61st Avenue N.E. extended any further West than the existing right of way and the . petitioner is to negotiate with the property owners for the rig.ht . of way or work with the Parks & Recreation Commission if this cul-de-sac has to be entirely on this plat. This would make lots 20 and 21 unbuildable and the balance of these lots could possibly be added on to the proposed park land. The petitioner was asked to dedicate 1.8 acres for park land and the City will have to negotiate � for the additional acre or so that will be needed for a neighborhood park. The petitioner was asked for a 10 foot sidewalk easement along Lot 15 for a walkway to the park. Any three to one slope on the plat would be sodded within one year of development to prevent erosion. Another stipulation was to have all the utilities undergrour�d. Mr. Clark continued, th.at there was a triangle needed for Briardale Road and the petitioner should negotiate with the Theilmann's or ask the City to negotia�e for it or else start condemnation proceed- ings for it. The road, Woodside Court would be temporarily dead- ended at the West and East sides where it meets the Theilmann property. O.ther stipulations were that the petitioner should plant one tree on each lot and the drainage plan be presented to the City Engineer for approval. � Mr. Clark said the street on the West side of the plat will line up with the road when Mr.O'Bannon develops his property. Mr. Drigans asked if Mr. O'Bannon has platted his property next to this plat yet. Mr. Clark said only a portion of it has been platted. � Mr. Clark said this plat was going to the Par�s& Recreation Commission at a later date. Paul Brown has said he would like room for a ball diamond, a multi-pu.rpose court to be used for basket ball and volley ball, a skating rink and possibly t1QCkey,and an a�paratus section. If the petitibner runs the cul-de-sac on parts of Lots 21 and Planning Commission Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page 5 1'1 22, the Parks Commission might pick up the balance of these two lots and leave them in their natural state. This area could be used for a hi11 for sliding in the winter time. Mr. Driagans asked to have the cul-de-sac problem explained again. Mr. Clark said th�t on the original proposal, 61st Avenue was extended the width of the plat. The:terrain is such that this really wasn't feasible. On the second plat, the petitioner is only extending 61st Avenue as far. as the right of way has already been dedicated, ending with a cul-de-sac at this point. This cul-de-sac would extend into � lots on the South side of this plat where right of way has not been granted. The Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee asked the petitioner to n•egotiate for this right of way. Two of the thre� people who would be involved in granting this right of way were at the earlier meeting and stated that they did not want to give this right of way. The other party was not present, but according to those present, he would be willing to give the right of way. If the right of way cannot be obtained in line with 61st Avenue, the petitioner might have to put the cul-de-sac all on his property which would make Lots 21 a�d 22 unbuildable, so it was suggested that the portion of � these lots that are remaining, be added to the park land to be purchased by the City. Mr. Lindblad said that Lots 22 and.23 were quite long lots. Mr. � Clark said this was because there was quite a grade change on these lots and they had to be that long so they would have about 60 feet to build on. Mr. Blair asked the status of the triangle of Theilmann property that comes down into Briardale Road. Mr. Clark said the Theilmann's were asked to dedicate the right of way for this road because this plat will help them develop their land when they are in a position to plat. Mr. Clark said it would be better for the grading and utility work if Theilmann's were to plat at the same time as the balance of this property is being platted. Mr. Goodroad said they have made every effort to work with every one concerned with the proposed plat. This is the best plan they could come up with that pleased the most people. Mr. Drigans asked Mr. Clark if all these lots will be buildable. Mr. Clark said there hasn't been enough time to check the lots against the elevations on the plat, but he would think about five lots would be prablem lots, where there will have to be a lot of grading, retain- ing walls and some terraci.ng. These would be Lots 26, 27, 28, and 29 for sure, where there is a 30 foot fall from the back lot line to the front 1ot line. They plan to use tuck under garages on these lots and will use about 4 feet for the driveway for the garage and about 6 feet on the grade of the house, leaving a difference in grade of ,r� 20 feet. This would be about a three to one slope. The two long lots in the Southwest corner of the plat have an area of about 70 feet they could k�uild on, and with a 35 foot setback and a 25 foot house, they could build on these lots. 1� �`'� � Planning Commission Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page 6 Chairman Fitzpatrick asked about the lots facing South on 61st Avenue. Mr. Clark said these lots are higher in front than in back, and will be walkouts. The petitioner has already stated that he intends to ask for a 10 foot variance on the front setback so these houses could be closer to the street. The houses on the same street in the Briardale Plat are set back 30 feet, so it wouldn't be too bad to have this variance as long as all the houses have the same setback. ' Mr. Harris said the right of way for the cul-de-sac on 61st Avenue is one of the hold-ups on.the plat. Mr. Clark said the petitioner will have to negotiate for the right of way for this cul-de-sac or move the cul-de-�sac. Chairman Fitzpatrick said it would be hard to make a decision on this;plat untiZ we know what the Parks& Recreation Commission decide on the par_k. Mr. Blair said there is already money budget�d for a park in this area. Chairman Fitzpatrick asked Mr. Harris if there was general agreement on this plat at the earlier Plats & Subdivisions meeting. Mr. Harris said this plat really didn't please anyone completely, but may be the best plat for this area. There were problems with the different grades but one of the stipulations made at this earlier meeting was that the grades be worked out with the City Engineering Department. Mr. Clark said it was difficult for the City or the petitioner to set grades until they have an approved preliminary plat to work with. Just looking at the topography map, it does look like it can work. Chairman Fitzpatrick said there were problems with the cul-de- sac, the park plan, the triangle and other problems on this plat that couldn't be resolved at this time and he wondered if the plat should be given preliminary a_pproval. Mr. Harris said the'se problems will have to be solved before final approval, so we could ask to see the final plat before it is submitted to the City Council. Mr. �Cl.a�xk said there is a sewer �and water project in this area and thepetiti�anerwould like to have this plat added to that project. He is also anxious to get some model homes built. Mr. Drigans said this was a sketch that was just drawn up today, and there were problems with this plat. We don't know if these will all be buildable sites, how many variances they will need, and if the problems can be worked out. Mr. Goodroad said this plat has been on the drawing board for some time, and it was only because of the requested changes that all the information wasn't ready at this time. Mr. Clark said they have prepared a topography:map,but at least three different plats have been drawn up in two weeks and it wasn't feasible to have this topography overlayed on each different proposal. Mr�. Harris said he felt it was necessary to approve this preliminary plat to give the petitioner some direction.. We will never know what � �"1 � Planning Commission Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page 7 the grades are or what the drainage problems will be, or what variances may be needed until we approve something. Mr. Lindblad said the Parks & Recreation Commission are going to have to have something to look at if they are to make a determination on the park land. Mr. Utter said he agreed with Mr. Harris in that the petitioner has to have somewhere to start and he has to have acceptance of this plat before he can start working on the problems. Mr. Drigans said he realized that the Plats & Subdivisions- Streets & Utilities Subcommittee had recom�ended approval of this preliminary plat but as far as he was concerned there were too many unanswered questions. He said he could see giving concept approval. He said we do not have any correspondence from Mr. O'Bannon on how he feels this plat will fit in with his property. Chairman Fitzpatrick said the petitioner was not asking for concept approval. He said that although this was the mast preliminary plat they had looked at in a long time, this was a request for prelim.= inary plat approval. Mr. Harris said the petitioner will be able to establish the street grades and lot grades after he has approval of this preliminary plat. ; Mr. Lindblad said he didn't think anything could be accomplished by delaying the approval of this plat. He said we should either approve or deny tYie preliminary plat at this meeting. MOTION by Harris, seconded by B.Zair, that the Planning Commission close the Public Hearing on the request for consideration of a pre- Iiminary plat, P.S. #74-01, Rice Creek Estates, by Goodco, Inc., and Pine Tree BuiZders. Upon a voice vote, aII voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Harris, seconded by Lindblad, that the Planning Commission recommend to Council approve of P.S. #74-01, a preliminary plat, Rice Creek Est��s, by Goodco, Inc., and Pine Tree Builders, a replat of part of Lots 9 and I0, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, .Zocated between Rice Creek Road and 61st Avenue Northeast and West of Benjamin Street, with the following stipulations: (1) Subject to obtaining street dedication from the Theilmann's for the extension of Briardale Road. (2) Subject to obtaining right of way for cul-de-sac on 61st Avenue or realignment of the cul-de-sac on petitioner's property. Tl�is may be negotiated at the time the discussion takes.place with the Parks & Recreation Commission. (3) Walkwa� be provided to park from f3enjamin in the vacinity of the South .Zine of Lot 15. (4) Subject to negotiation with the City for additional park Iand. � Planning Commission Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page 8 (5). Provide underground utilities. (6) One tree planted per Iot, 2" minimum diameter. (7j Grades to be worked out with City Engineering Department. (8) Lots that have grade difficulties with a three to one sZope after the grade is established, be sodded within one year of completion. ' (9) Wood.side Court be temporarily dead-ended on the East and West side of the Theilmann property line. (IO) AI1 Iots must meet minimum lot size and have minimum front footage and depth. (11) After the grades have been established by the engineer's, the pZat come back to the Planning Commission before Council approval. Upon a voice vote, Harris, Lindblad, Blair, and Fitzpatrick voting aye, Drigans abstaining, the motion carried. � 3. DESIGNATION OF l.11 MILES OF STATE AID STREETS Mr. Harris�said this was reviewed by the Plats & Subdivisions- Streets & Utilities Subcommittee at their meeting of February 13, 1974. They changed the priority list as given in the February 7th memo from Richard Sobiech. The priorities stayed th� same except that Main Street from 83rd Avenue N.E. to 85th Avenue N.E. was inserted as number three instead of number one. The Subcommittee felt that they would rather wait a year on this street until the North Park area was settled. Mr. Clark said that with the mileage , that'.would be allowed the following year, they would be able to designate this street at that time. Mr. Lindblad asked the advantages and disadvantages to having State Aid streets. Mr. Clark said a city is allowed to designate 200 of its street as State Aid streets. We collect construction money and maintenance money based. on the mileage designated for State Aid. This year, the City rec�ived �185,000 in construction money. The disadvantages mirht be that they dictate how the road should be constructed. They must be 9 ton roads. The minimum width is 40 fcet and they like to see � them 44 feet or wider. Having a State Aid road does disrupt some �. neighborhoods because people tend to drive faster on these wider streets, and it has been said that we are building speedways. Mr. Clark said that on'the Iist of priorities recommended by the Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee that number 1 Planning Commzssion Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page 9 �'h needs another mat and curb,(Main Street - Osborne Road to 79th Avenue), number 2,(Commnacnumber 3,7(MainVStreet•E•83�doAbenue NOEa)toe85th another mat, a Avenue N.E.) needs everything. . Mr. Harris said that the City administration didn't feel we would get State Aid approval on priorities 4 and 5. Mr. Clark said that Benjamin Street from Rice Creek Road to Gardena Avenue, is a brand new street�and we probably won't be spending any money on this street for 20 years. On the fifth priority, Jackson Street -- 73rd Avenue N.E. to Osborne Road, one of the conditions the State put on this route was that it be continued South from 73rd across Rice Creek to Rice Creek Terrace. Mr. Drigans asked why we are designating f'ive priorities when � cnly t�ao can be approved. Mr. Clark said that if the State doesn't accept the first two priorities, they would alternate priorities to choose from. Mr. Drigans asked if there were other places in the Cit� other than those on thispriority list that would be better to designate. Mr. Clark said many routes are suggested to the State, and they then tell the City where they would accept State Aid designation. MOTION by B1air, seconded by Lindblad, that the Planning Commission r.-� recommend to Council that the priority list for designating .Z.11 mi.Zes of State Aid streets.be as fol.Zows: (1) Main Street - Osborne Road to 79th Avenue (0,36'mz.ies) (2) Commerce Lane - 73rd Avenue N.E. to Osborne Road (0.44 miles) (3} Main Street - 83rd Avenue N.E. to 85th Avenue N.E. (0.39 miles) (4) Benjamin Street - Rice Creek Road to Gardena Avenue (0.51 mile$ (5) Jackson 5treet - 73rd Avenue N.E. to Osborne Road {D.50 miles) Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 4. MEMO FROM DARREL CLARK TO CITY ATTORNEY: FEBRUARY 8, 1974 Mr. Clark said this memo covered two items. The first was on the sign ordinance on billboards. He said he had talked to Mr. Herrick and he said he would answer this part of the memo after he has met with the Planning Commission and the Board of Appeals. The sscond item on the memo was just to ask for clar�fication on recommending a Special Use instead of rezoning, and he said this was something v�re have done before on the�North Suburban Hospital �• District rezoning request. Mr. Clark said you couldn't change the rezoning request to different zoning, but as a Special Use Permit is more restrictive, this is allowed. � Planning Commission Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page 10 � Mr. Clark asked when the Planning Commission and Board of Appeals � would like to have their meeting with Mr. Herrick. Mr. Drigans said the Board of Appeals was meeting on March 12th and_the special meeting could be held after this meeting as long as the Board members would already be present. He said they usually met at 7:30 but they could meet at 7:00 this evening so the special meeting could be sure to start around 8:00 P.M. This was satisfactory to the other members of the Planning Commission. Mr. Lindblad asked if there was any advantage to the City in . allowing billboards. Mr. Clark said he thought it might have been the intention of the Planning Commission and the Council when they adopted this sign ordinance that possibly they could eliminate some of these billboards in five years since the ordinance required Council action on billboards . within five y�ars of the original adoption, at least the ones that have serious problems. These would be the billboards that are too close to an intersection or in residential areas. Mr. Drigans asked Mr. Clark if he cbuld prepare a map showing the location of the existing billboards and have photographs taken of each one. Mr. Lindblad said he.��rould like to know how much tax revenue � the City receives from these billboards. Mr. Harris said if we knew where each one was located we would know what the prablem was with each one and how bad the problem really is with these billboards. Mr. Clark said he would have this information for the special meeting. 5. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE FROM COON RAPIDS PLANNING COMMISSION Mr. Clark said this Planned Unit Development is requ.ested by Burlington Northern and will be located North of the North Park area and across from Northtown. Mr. Fitzpatrick asked if anyone from the City would be attending this meeting. Mr. Clark said he could not attend, but he would contact Coon Rapids and get a copy of the proposal and a copy of the minutes of this meeting. • 6. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE: SPRING LAKE PARIC �.. Chairman Fitzpatrick said this was a request for a 78 unit apartment for the elderly and a 150 bed board and care facility for the retired, located at Osborne Road and Terrace which will be heard on. February 28, 1974. � Mr. Harris said he would be able to attend this meeting. Planning Commission Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page 11 .7. COURT DECISION ON LOT SPLIT REQUEST: EDINA I'�`\ Mr. Fitzpatrick said this was included in our agenda just as information. He said he was surprised this decision hadn't be.en appealed and that the decision stood. He said he thought it was a very interesting case. Mr. Drigans said he agreed. Chairman Fitzpatrick said it gives the Planning Commission moral support. 8. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE: SPRING LAKE PARK Chairman Fitzpatrick said this was a request for a Special Use Permit to allow construction and use of a Fotomat facility and miniature golf course at $3rd & University. Mr. Clark said they must have an ordinance similar to ours, because this would require a Special Use in Fridley also. Mr. Fitzpatrick said this was going to be heard at the same time as the other request in Spring Lake Park so Mr. Harris can • bring back information on this item also. 9. FEBRUARY 27, 1974 MEETSNG OF DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPNIEIVT IN MANKATO, MINNESOTA � Mr. Clark said that Mr. Jerrold Boardman was attending this meeting and he intended to attend also, if possible. He said this . meeting u�as to modify Section 23 on the leasing program for public housing. Mr:. Clark said he was bringing it to the attention of the Planning Commission in case any of them were interested in a�tending this meeting as some of the members have gone to these meetings in the past. 10. TREE ORDINANCE Mr. Blair asked if this ordinance would be coming before the Planninc Co�mission. Mr. Clark said that ordinarily it wouldn't unless the Council chooses to sent it to you. Chairman Fitzpatrick�.adjourned the meeting at 10•40 P.M. Respectfully submitted, � �� , �� . � � i��l.(j/'. l-C'.�Lt.':�'T t./ . orothy Ev son, Secretary � P'� CITY OF FRIDLEY PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS-. STREETS & UTILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING CALL TO ORDER: � �.2 ��Y- � � �� .�_ _ � FEBRUARY 20, 1974 PAGE 1 Chairman Harris called the meeting to order at 7:15 P.M. ROLL CALL: 1. Members Present: Members Absent: Others Present• Harris, French, Forster, Christensen Meissner Darrel Clark, Community Development Administrator CONTINUED: CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. #74-01, RICE CREEK ESTATES, BY GOODCO, INC., AND PINE TREE BUILDERS: A replat of Lot 10, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, except the North 260 feet thereof; and Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, except the North 260 feet of the West 132 feet, located -� b�tween Rice Creek Road and 61st Avenue N.E. and West of Benjamin Street N.E. Mr. Roland Goodroac� was present to represent the petitioner. Mr. and Mrs. Theodore Theilmann were also present. Mr. Harris said Goodco, Inc.,.had presented a plat at the meeting of Februa�y 13, 1974 and at that time they were requested to prepare a plat without the Theilmann parcel. Mr. Roland Goodroad explained the new preliminary plat proposal. He said there would be a cul-de-sac with a 50 foot radius at the end of where the existing right of way ends for 61st Avenue N.E. They wi11 have to get additional right of way from peaple South of the plat for this cul-de-sac. ' Mrs. Gloria Arel, 1521 Ferndale Avenue N.E.,,asked if this road was going to be cut to the elevation of the gravel pit. Mr. Clark said the cul-de-sac would be about 300 feet West of Benjamin Street and would be about 10 feet to 15 feet above the grade at Benjamin. You can't go steeper than 6% or the cars would have difficulty going up and down this.street in the winter time. Mr. Ctiarles Rice, 1521 Ferndale Avenue N.E., sa�i•d part of the circle for the cul-de-sac would be on his property and he didn't want to give up any of his property for the cul-de-sac: M�. Thomas Eggen, 1344 Hillcrest Drive N.E. said there were some � .�high cliffs in this plat and how did they expect to build homes on _�tixthem. Mr. Goodroad said they would have tuck under garages. Mr. Harris asked if all the lots next to Heather Hills would have to have tuck under garages. Mrs. Clark said that because of the radical grade change :most of these lots woulc� hat�e to have tuck under garages and the two lots on 62nd Avenue have about sixty to sev_enty feet of area between �� Plats & Subs.-Str. & Util. Sub. Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page 2 n, the street and the toe of the slope therefore they could be normal � at-grade homes. Mr. Harris asked what the soil conditions were on this plat. Mr. Goodroad said it was gravel. Mr. Harris asked if there would have to be some drain tile in some areas because of the drop in grade. Mr. Goodroad said they might have to use some drain tile. Mr. Harris said Mr. O'Bannon had come to the last Plats & Sub- divisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee meeting after the petitioner had 1eft, and it didn't seem that he would be agreeable to having any� grade change started on his property, so any grade change would have to start at the property line. Mr. Harris asked about drainage for this plat. Mr. Clark said it would depend upon when the Theilmann parcel was platted as to where the drainage would go, but there wasn't a drainage plan for this plat yet. Mr. Harris asked about public utilities. Mr. Clark said they �would come in from Benjamin. He said there was an 8" pipe and this was larg� enough to take care of this area and there would be enough of a drop, for these utilities. Mr. Harris asked about the electric and telephone lines. Mr. J"� Goodroad said they intended to have underground uti�lities. Mr. Robert Ledin, 6243 Kerry Lane N.E. asked what would be assessed against the abutting property owners for the development of utilities for this plat. Mr. Harris said he thought the only assessment would be for storm sewer and this Subcommit�ee couldn't say if Mr. Ledin would be assessed or not. This would be determined by the City Council, and they would hold a Public Hearing for any assessments. Mr. Goodroad said he didn't know if there would be storm sewers in this area. It might be handled by catch basins. Mr. Rice, 1541 Ferndale Avenue N.E., said he didn't want to lose property for the cul-de-sac and then get assessed for the street also. Councilm�n-at�larg�,Utter said that the lots on Ferndale were large eno.ugh so they could be split into two lots when Glst Avenue with the cul-de-sac is constructed. Mr. Rice said they didn't want to split their lot. , Mr. Utter said he thought there was a problem being created with the area being set aside for a neighborliood park. There should be another access to this park or it would be almost landlocked from � the children South of this plat. They would be cutting through private property to get to the park. He thought there could be some shifting of Lots 10 through 15, and 10 feet could be taken off Lot 9, to allow a walkway along Lot 15. Mr. Harris said 10 feet could be provided �or �a walkway in this area. � L� Plats & Subs.-Str. & Util. Sub. Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page 3 � Mr. Larry Lembke, 1505 Ferndale Avenue N.E., asked if his property would be assessed for any storm sewer needed for this p1at. Mr. Harris said he wouldn't think so, but couldn't say with certainty because the storm sewer design has not been made for this plat. Mr. Clark said the petitioner is not dedicating the land for the entire park. He is dedicating l.8 acres and the additional acre or more would have to be purchased by the City. This premininary plat is also going to the Parks and Recreation Commission for consideration of the park area. � Mr. Harris asked about the lots along Heather Hills. He wondered ! if it would help to make deeper lots. Mr. Clark said the front elevation of these lots was 920 feet and the bank elevation was 950 feet. He . said they can make up 4 feet with the driveway and anather 6 feet with the tuck under garage, so that would be 10 feet altogether. This would make a three to one�lope or 20 vertical feet in about 70 feet horizontal in the rear yard. Mr. Harris asked if all these lots would be buildable. Mr.. Clark said he thought there would have to be some terraeing and retaining walls, if they were going to be buildable. Mr. Harris asked Mr. Goodroad if they planned any vegetation in the area. Mr. Goodroad said they didn't have any plans as yet. Mr. /'� French said they have been asking that new plats provide one tree per lot. This shoul,d be a tree that is disease resistant with a minimum of 2" diameter. Mr. Goodroad said they have put it in the purchase agreement or in a covenant that the property must be sodded one year from completion of a home site in other areas, and this could be done here. i`� Mrs. Gloria Are7� said she had a petition signed by 25 people who were against this plat that she would like to present. Mr. Harris said the Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee could receive this petition and pass it along to the Planning Commission. MOTION by Christensen, seconded by Forsfer, that the Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities 5ubcommitee accept the petitioni. waive the reading of this petition and pass it on to the Planning Commission. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Lembke, 1505 Ferndale Avenue N.E., said.he lives at the dead end of Ferndale and it is no problem and he thought 61st Avenue could be a dead end. Mr. Harris sai.d it was poor planning and poor engineering to have a dead end street without a turn around. It makes it difficult for plowing snow, inconvenient for emergency vehicles, and trucks have to pull into a private driveway to turn around. Mr. Lembke said trucks use his driveway and he doesn't mind. Mr. Clark said it is a dangerous practice if there are children playing in the area. � Mr. Harris asked Mr. Theilmann how he liked the revis�d pre- liminary plat presented at this meeting. Mr. Theilmann said he was - ' ' � �� Plats & Subs.-Str. & Util. Sub. Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page 4 � �not prepared to develop his property at this time, but the plan presented tonight does not hamper our pl.an to plat our property at a later date. I will get 8 lots with this proposal, if I can get additional land from the petitioner to make the lots meet the required front footage. Mr. Goodroad said they have set aside a 20 foot strig for this purpose. Mr. Harris said we still have the problem of the cul-de-sac on 61st Avenue. We wi11 have to ask the petitioner to obtain the right of way for the cul-de-sac or have the City negotiate for it or siart condemnation proceedings for this right of way. Mr. Harris wondered if some of the property shown as park property could be inoved so there would be room for the cul-de-sac on this plat. Mr. Clark said the terrain was such that they would need at least 300 feet by 300 feet for park property to provide the facilities the Park & Recreation Director would like to see in this park. A ball diamond needs 250 square feet. If the petitioner has to shorten the cul-de-sac, he will lose Lots 20 and 21 for building sites and the balance of these lots could probably be added to the park property.. Mr. Clark said the petitioner can work with the neighbors and the Parks & Recreation Commission on this cul-de-sac but he didn't think this should hold up the plat. Mr. Theilmann said they didn't want to dedicate the road for � Woodside Court at this time because if they did, they might as well plat because they would get all the assessments, and they ��r�n't in a position to plat at this time. Mr, Goodroad said he has already lost 15 lots from this plat, and the plan presented tonight �as the best he could do to please the most people. If this plat wasn't acceptable, he was ready to let the property go�back to the City. Mr. Harris said there is going to have to be some street dedication from the Theilmann's for Briardale Road that will be going through at the present time on this plat. There is a smalltriangle of the Theilmann property in this road. He thought this dedication would be of mutual benefit to both parties. Mr. Goodroad said he didn't think it would hinder any property even if they didn't want to split their lots, to have a small part of the cul-de-sac on the property South of this plat for 61st Avenue. Mr. Clark said it wouldn't take much property, but the peaple didn't want the assessments that would come with having this cul-de-sac on their property. Mr. Harris said that if the petitioner didn't want to negotiate for the 61st Avenue right of way he needs for the cul-de-sac, or couldn't negotiate, then it would have to be negotiated by the City or condem- /1 nation proceeding would have to take place. He said this would add 25% in administrative costs to the cost of acquiring this right of way and this would be assessed back to the property owners in the project. For this reason, it is better and cheaper for the petitioner to do his own neg�tiating.. Mr. Harris said he thought the Subcommittee would be negligent if theyapproved this plat without the street dedications. � �� Plats & Subs.-Str. & Util. Sub. Meeting - February 20, 1974 Page 5 ,/'� Mr. Harris said you either pay now or pay later. Mr. Goodroad said it seemed Iike the developer gives everything. Mr. Harris said that it was one of the hard facts of life, that a developer has to give to get. � Mr. Harris said he didn't warit to get into any real estate d.ealings, but perhaps Mr. Goodroad could do some trading with the Theilmann's for the righi of way on the small corner of their parcel needed for right of way on Briardale Road, and the Theilmann's needed a 17 foot strip to make their lots meet the minimum front footage requirements, when they want to develop their plat. Mr. Harris said that Woodside Court could be temporarily dead- ended until the Theilmann's were in a position to plat. � Mr. French said that one solution would be for the Theilmann's to dedicate the street right of way to the City on Briardale Road in consideration of the petitioner platting his parcel in such a way as to allow Mr. Theilmann to get 8 lots when he is able to plat. Mrs. Theilmann said they would like to check with their attorney on this. Mr. Harris said we wouldn't have to have the street dedication �, until Council was ready to consider the final plat. Mr. Theilmann said as long as they didn't have to give an answer on this right now, they didn't want to hold up approval of the plat. MOTION by French, seconded by Christensen, that the Plats & Subdivisions-�Streets & Utilities Subcommittee recommend to the Planninq Commission approval of a preliminary plat, P.S. #74-01, Rice Creek Estates, by Goodco, Inc., and Pine Tree BuiZders, being a replat of �Qt_:10, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, except the North 260 feet thereof'; and Lot 9, Auditor`s Subdivision No. 22, except the North 260 feet of the West 132 feet, Iocated between Rice Creek Road and 61st Avenue N.E. and West of B�njamin Street N.E. witlz the fallowing sti�ulations: (1) Subject to obtaining street dedication frora the Theilmann's for the exte�sion of Briar.dale Road. (2) Subject to obtaining right of way for cul-de-sac on 6lst Avenue N.E. or realignment.of the cul-de-sac on petitioner's property. This may be negotiated at the time the discussion takes place with the Parks & Recreation Commission. (3) Walkway be provided to the park from Benjamin in the vacinity /"\ '� of the SoUth line of Lot 15. (4) 5ubject to negotiation with the City for additional park 1and. ' (5) Provide undergr.ound utilit,ies. r Plats & Subs.-5tr. & Util. Sub. Meeting - February 24, 1974 P`ag 6 • (6) One tree pZanted per Iot, 2" minimum.diameter. � (7) Grades to be worked out with the City Engineering Department. (8) Lots that have grade difficulties; with a three to one slope, after the grade is estabZished, be sodded within one year of completion. (9) Woodside Court be temporariZy dead-ended on the East and West side of the Theilmann lot line. Upon a voice vote a1Z voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Chairman Harris adjourned the meeting at 8:40 P.M. /� Respectfully submitted, � � �L�S .,.�� Ti�I�2�1 c'Y�/ Dorothy enson, Secretary � r BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOb�9ITTEE bfEETING OF FEBRUARY 21, 1974 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Lindblad at 8:05 p.m. b9EMBERS PRESENT: Lindblad, Tonco, Simoneau, Treuenfels MEMBERS ABSENT: Cariolano OTHERS PRESENT: Jerry Boardman, Planning Assistant MOTION by Tonco, seconded by Simoneau to waive the approval of the minutes of the January 31, 1974 and February 7, 1974 meetings as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 1. CONSInERATION OF A R�QUEST TO CHANGE THE FACIAL TREATMENT ON THE PRES�NT ADDI'I'ION: LOC�1'ED ON BLQCK 4, AUDI'I'OR'S SUBDIVISION N0. 79, PARCEL 1800; 'I'I-IE St1T1E BEI�iG 5170 b1AIN STREET N.E., FRIDLEl', MINN. (REQUEST BY FULI,ERTON I�iEWUFACTURING CO., 5170 MAIN STREET N.E., FRIDLEY, I�IINNESO'I't1) . THIS ITEM itiAS TO BUILDING STt1I�DARDS-DESIGI�I CONTP.OL AT THE OCTOBER ].8, 1973 ?�IEETING. Mr. Boardman said that this reauest was wi�hdrawn by the petitioner because they are going to use brick as originally planned. 2. CONSIDF.R�ITION OF A IZEC�U�ST TO CONSTRUC'T A NEW 1'VAREHOUSE WITH A SNIALL J'\ QFFICE SPACE; LOCATTD ON l'ARCEL 7200 AND 7210, SOUTH fiALF OF SEGTION 3, FRZI�LE1', AIINNESOTA: THE SA�'�tl, E3EING 7900 MaIN STREET N.E., .FRIDL�Y AZINNESOT'A. (RF.QUES`l' �Y ROYAL DEVLLOF�IENT CORP. , 900 WEST COUNTY , �1i�i�tir.�u�H� . Mr. Don Babinski was present for the rec{uest. Mr. Babinski said that this building is the same size as the buildi.ng at 7901-Beech Street, next door, and will have the same setbacks. The only dif£erence is that the des��n of tlie building will be like the one approved on 73rd Avenue and Old Central with wing walls at the entrax�ces with exterior fill material of wood panel. The wing walls will protrude from the building by four feet in order to leave some planting area next to the building. „ Mr. Boaxdman asked if it woul.d be possible to eliminate some of the parking that is bei.ng provided and stipulate thaf the parking be put in if needed. The i•eason for this request is to eliminate the vast amount of uneeded blacktopping in the front yard of these buildings when being used as a warehouse. Mr. Babinslci said that he woul.d prefer to do it that way, but had already discussed this �vith his mortgage campany ancl they said that they would accept no less than 136 parking stalls; anyt°:i_ng less than this would be out of the c{uestion. He also said that !�_. would do any type of � • berming or ]andscaping that the City wanted. btr. '1'onco asked if he �,tas going to put a sidewalk along the front of the bui l di�lg. �r.. ;,-; _ � �.� � ' BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE}MEETING OF FEBR�JARY 21, 1974-PG. 2 Mr. Boardman said that what would be necessary in order to get a six foot sidewalk and still meet all of the front setback requirements would k f' f t � l'� �� be to move the building bac ive ee . ,,;� '*�,. Mr. Lindblad said that it was important that an entrance sidewalk be put in and if the petitioner �aould have any objections to moving the building back 5 feet in order to allow for a four foot planting area with a six foot sidewalk. Mr. Babinski said that he might have problems with his mortgage company with this move because the loan has been approved on the plan that is pre- sented at this time and any change on ,it might jeopardize his loan. He said he did noi know i_f there could be any leeway in dealing with his loan company. Mr. Tonco said that he felt the sidewalk was definitely needed and that all possibilities to convince the loan company that tlie move is desirable should be carried out. If they still have any problems then possibly some� thing could be worked out with the Planning Department in order to get the required side�aalk. � Mr. Tonco asked how the wood canopy at the front entrance would be constructed. Mr. Babinski said that the wood panel would be flush with the wall abhve the doors. Mr. Boardman sa.id that this was not what was dis cussed and set up originally. The wood was supposed to be at the front face of the four foot wings forming a canopy out of the entire section. This canopy would house any entrance lighting for the doorway. Mr. Babinski said that he was not aware of this and had always been under the impression that the wood �ould be just attached directly to the wall between the fins. Both Mr. Lindblad and Mr. Tonco agxeed that the framing of the canopy as originally concurred would cause undue hardship to the builder and tlzey would suggest that they accept the wood panel directly attached to the building wall but that a flat canopy about 1? to 18 inches in depth be located betcaeen the fins right above the door for weather protection and entrance lighting and that the canopy be constructed to match the wood panel on the back wall. Mr..Lindblad asked if there will Ue any rooftop equipment. Mr. Babinski said that there would be, but that they �vould be quite small, no more than 24 inches high. rfr. Lindblad said that our code requires .these to be screeried i.f they can be seen from public thoroughfare. �9r. Babinski said that it would be almost impossible to see them on this size of a building. The existing building has the same type of equipment and it cannot be seen from the street. He said he would be willing to screen them if requested to do so. Mr. Lindblad also mentioned that any outside storage or garbage facilities must be screened. � 0 A �� UILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOh'�iITTEE DIEETING OF FEBRUARY 21, 1974-PG. 3 Mr. Boardman said that the same type of entrace treatment off of 79th Ave.on this building must be similar to the other building in order to achi.eve some continuity. He wi11 need to put in wood posts at the 79th Avenue entrance. Additional landscaping will be reQuired as well as soil berming along 79th Avenue and Main Street. Mr. Babinski said he would landscape the project anyway the City would like it. MOTION by Simoneau, seconded by Tonco, to recommend approval to the City Council of this building caith the following stipulations: 1. That the building be moved back five feet to allow for a six foot sidewalk in front of the building. If due to mortgage reasons beyond the control of the developer this move cannot b e made, then the developer can work with the Planning Department to see if the sidewalk can be provided some other way. � � 2. T'hat the canopy as shown in the drawings be eliminated and that tlie wood panel be mounted on the wall bet�aeen the fins. and a canopy of 12 inches or more be provided above the doors to provide weather protection as well as entrance lighting. � � 3, That posts be put in along the 79th Avenue entrance to match those at 7901 Beech Street. 4. Additional landscaping and soil berming b e provided (as per revised plan approved February 21, 1974). 5. Exterior screening to be provided if rec{uested by the City to meet City codes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Chairman Lindblad adjourned the meeting at 9:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, � '�_ j i' /� . �_ ; :,, �� ' � ,� ! i �� _. , � .. . . . . _. _ - _., . :___�--_.-�-,-,. fI:I:3.:O:LU L. EO�'�I':Di�i��:�; _�— �Pl�znninc� n��:is�ar� f� � PLANNING COMMISSIOr1 MEMBERS �� I am only putting in this Public Hearing notice in your �"'�' ac�enda because the petitioner hasn't met the stipulation of going to Building Standar�j��^SC j��L t10TIC1? Design Control Subcommittee yet so the recLuest wilzlC��l�y pI� 1'I2TDLr1' �YP �o be continued. PU}3LIC IiE1�P.TNG � Bzror:� z�i�i� PLANNIP7G C0�'ii�1ISSION TO t�I;O�� IT %ZE�Y CONCPRN: Not�ice is hereb:7� c�i_ven thai� -t=here wila_ be a PuUlic I:Iearinc� a� the P:Lanr�i_r�g Co?ni?�ission of the City o.f I'r_idley in the Cii.y F1,=� 11 a � G� 31 Unive:L sity Avenue Nor_ tliea�,t on �Jledne ,d.��.y, Fe�ri�ary G, 1974 in -Lhe CounciJ_ Chamber at B:00 P.Ti. -f_-or the purpose of : Cor�:>ide_cat.ion of a r.ezoninq request, 70� #74-02, _ by Berkele�T 1?t�ml� Co„zpany, '�o r�zc�re L�ts l and 2, I3Zoc}� 13 � Sp:cing I3r.aok. Par}> ��dditio�.z, from R-1. (s�.ngle Lami._ly dw.e1_li.ne� are�?s) to I�1-1 (light inc�us-Lriul ar_e �.5) , a11. lya_nc� in th� Sc�uth Hal.f � of S�c �:i.on 3, T--� 0, R-24 , City of F'rid.l�y , C�unty � of. T�r�.o;;.a,� I�iinnesoLa. Gen.cral:ly 7_aca��ed �t� l�l: �ly Strcet I1.E. .7�rzyon� �-ahc� de�;ir..�s to k�e heard w�.th re�erenc� to �:lie above rn��t:�ter may be hea:rd a-E� this tirne. l�ub1_i�:>h: January 23, 19`79 Janu�i:cy �0, 1974 � � . �DWI�RD J. FITZPATRICK C �i la I t:i��1�'�N PLAI1i�I2QG COtiiI�'lISSIO:J 0 � OFFICIAL NOTICE CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ' PLANNING COMMISSION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: . Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public . Hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on , Wednesday, March 6, 1974 at 8:00 P.M. in the Council Chamber for the purpose of: A request for a Special Use Permit, SP #74-01, by G. Ralph Skinner, per Fridley City Code, Section 205.051, 2, A, to construct a second assessory building, a shed to be used for � storage, on Lots 20 and 21, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, lying in the South Half of Section 13, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota Generally located at 6217 Central Avenue N.E. Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter may be heard at this time. Publish: February 20, 1974 . February 27, 1974 � 0 EDWARD J FITZPATRICK CHAIRMAN PLANNING COMMISSION i �� I r• � � � � " CI1'Y OP rRIDLEY ' MINNI:SO'1'A � . PLAI�'NING /1Nll ZONIIvG F01��1 Numbert�.y�� %y� v � � l � APPI.ICANT' S SIGN/ITURE �� Address � Teleplione Nwnber --��(' c� -- (, PR01'L1tT1' Ol��}:R'S SIGNI�J'J]tL ��-�,� G��.i.�� Address �� Telephone Number �/ �� I TYPI: OF 12CQUIiS1' Rezoning ��Special Use � Permit Approval of Prcl:i�ninar.y 1'l�i Approval of Final 1'lzt Strcets or Alley Vacatiozis Other ' .Street Location of Property ,F�Z.-/ � �. e!-� G �.• � Legal Description of Pro��erty��,�� 9�" � �,"L Present ZoTiing Classificat;ion ,1�' -- / r Existing Use of Property /�d C'..1�� Pro�osed Zoning Classification, Special Use, or ot}ier rec{uest � � _ �,.� _ �- � : _ - � _ � -� � � ��I_ � : � . Describe briefly the Type of t�se and Improvement Proposed :.,�- /� /I � � _ i 'Acreage of Proper. t� `� �, / � Has tlle Present Applicant Previously Souglit to Rezone, Plat, Obtain a Lot Split, OUtain a Variznce or Special Use Permit orr the Subject Site or Part of It?�_ �i�1C11? {Vhat was 'rec�uestcd Fee Cnclosecl$ � Eiec. No. �� y� �/ - .�.s'"`' ,^ pate rilecl • ��, �/, /9'y� Datc of ticaxing Fi�'N$2;G 41AC1 zONI1�C FOi�i r3t�bRr-��,. :.--_� 7�' v � . PAC'i: � �� , . /"� �4't� �3�de�'vf�ned underaCands that: (a) A list of All residenta Anc� �anera af �;a- � � perty within 3G0 feet �usC b� �CCache�4 (;� this epplication. , (b) This n.ppli.c�tton ca�st be ��T��c3 b� r�ll ' • ownezs of th� property� or r.n e: p��sn�e4.G� • �i��en why thiA i.a not the Gt3��, . (c) Responsibility for nny dezect fc1 the p��:- ' ceedin�:� resul.ting �rca the �a�ixuYe �` F:; ;;;:. the n�mea �ind a�dre�aca o€ pl� X�eici�nt:; . � nnd piopert� o�r,erb of propez�ty ��ii;';a� ;;°.':;;� � � feet of the pro��rty �n questtson, be�,o;zug � Co thc undcrsi�ne�'. � �.��d�R�G �n� C�anexs of �rope�ey within 30� feet:� . . � �RSOt�5 l�DURESS ' 0 ♦ � . . . . - - . �...+M.T�rt 0 -- - ��rt . . � . . . � • / . . �, p�;�tcb og p�ogo�ed praperty and structure u�uat be drac�n a� the back o� �h$a �'O�p pT' ti�tach�d, 8how.ng the followin�; 1. tiorth Dirccrion 2. LocntloEi af I'ropo3ed SCrL+cturo aca la�. . 3. AiaeRSions of proasrcy� �ro�o�e�l . � ' a[ructurr.� nnd �roac pnd sfde �vtRba�;.w�� - 4. Street Fiataes S. Loc�tfon Lnd use oi �djacent exi�tinw � buildings (ctithin 300 f�et) . �� yndersigned herc�by dcclaxoe that sll thc fa ta and reprecent�tiana atated �p tE1S.v epPiicctS.on a:e tr�ea an� correct. �.$'� ;C�.Q� '7; /1 % � ___-__'TGi�ATtJZE ,� ;;�' A P 1`Zi ��i�T ) . � �`�` ' • � • • e, . . . � � � �..I;,.f � . . 0 � � � � . � � � .� � ¢p�rovcd At+nied By th� ;oegd a� t3p�►e��e f3tab�8cC .to tt�e �'ollo�lnII Conditinng: ' • � ��C,� �pptcovpd I�aied -- by ti�� Plsnnin� CcYxaiaQion on � �ub��f�t �tA �he ixollowinF C�nuitiona: �""�" ��Q �!,�;�roved Penied by chc Couacil on �ic�t�g�ct L� thc F.qllouing Con:�iCiong: � ' � d�i�a �Pr� i'C �b0 r ` � � ❑ 0 /'\ /",, MAILING LIST SP #74-01 G. Ralph Skinner 6219 Centzal Avenue N.E. Mr. & Mrs. James Skog 6274 Ben More Drive N.E. Fridley, 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Brickner 6245 Ben More Drive N.E. Fridley 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Ronald Nolby 6253 Ben More Drive N.E. Fridley 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Harry Messick 6257 Ben More Drive N.E. Fridley 55432 � Mr. & Mrs. John Beaulieu 6244 Kerry Lane N.E. Fridley 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Marvin Johnson 6240 Kerry Lane N.E. Fridley 55432 �J� Planning Commission 2/19/74 I Mr. & Mrs. Walter Rydberg 6127 Woody Lane N.E. Fridley 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Douglas Ramseth 6125 Woody Lane N.E. Fridley 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Wayne Welch 6115 Woody Lane N.E. Fridley 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Douglas Henderson 6175 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Ervin Kassow 1500 Rice Creek Road N.E. Fridley 55432 Dorothy M. Miles 1370 Rice Creek Road N.E. Fridley 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Russell Alberc�:` Mr. & Mrs. Nestor Mathilda 6236 Kerry Lane N.E. 6271 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley 55432 Fridley 55432 _ _ _ - __� M & M Properties 1448 Rice Creek Road N.E. Fridley 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Edward Bauler 1420 Rice Creek Road N.E.� Fridley 55432 � Mr. Max Soliterman 25 University Avenue S.E. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414 Isabelle H. Jordal 6133 Woody Lane N.E. Fridley 55432 � Mr.•& Mrs. Loren Adolphson 6131 Woody Lane N.E. Fridley,�Minnesota 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Harold Morgan ��, ' 6245 Central Avenue N.E. � 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Orlin Myrlie 6229 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley 55432 Mr. & Mrs. G. Ralph Skinner 6217 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley 55432 _ _ _ • � -�_ ,, ..,, . ' i ' ��D � � `";.,� � � � _ SP #74-01, G. Ralph Skinner ` � � � " 6217 Central Avenue N.E.to allow �" h � , ; . � : i � �� 61�p/ 1373 ; 13�,j , 2nd assessory building, a storage —;, ' :;, �• shed, per Fridley Code, Section /�� lrNoU '�:i: � , ��T�; ��V�. ;�.1�; � 205. osi, 2, A. i + �� '�i .:w '` '`-,.---r+-��. .C�� .: � `t , �� - t t i �' iY' tc ,e i i. t . ' �'� / � +�1 �� .•. � G1 / �J ��, .� �372 13y`� I ��{0�7 �. f �IZG lt�y �y�o %y '�y ��r 9� � �,./ ''�-1 � �,_?:;. ,4' �.jcp� �I�O% I (,,��n % � �� 3r ,�� o � %;,� �g 3) � • 1e"'v 1V`� � � , i a . . i � /CC�(.'! : �'�o if. 'a��) 'O : .) �,'��^. � pg - '•�� r�. � "". .^' „� ' ,?' f Z. -�. ..__-' .�. � ti ��v;t �/L ,y"� �,� i � U ! �.'a'/Jt.>E' `fF�� -'� � i90� �. � i g i � i � . :� � r/ � � d r. `� � . .0 �.... � . � n ✓ ' // � - 1 . ' �ld � t/CL,y c,. . ; ;,,��. ; , 1 i � , ,-- • ;,�:.,-� iv �,• , . � ' i . � � �� `, ` `'�o iip 1. . � � ! i � K �� i O� __.._.._ _J3i LJ-� �r..�-^ . '� 'k _, �� ' � � � �Y I / • �•F.f O� ;' -- - _• _ . _-- . ___. Ro. Fs��-'^� '�~T � , � - - -/.t . � r � t . • _ _. _ ._. _ . . _...__ . . . r...��.y . . � -_ _— _ . . _ _'. ` M � � _ _ 3.isg3 ,_ _ ` � � ' - � � �3 y;�� i3;tG,' (i2aoJ c��sv� (iioo.l <�oco� : !�.�� '. ;:3'6c;- • �rtor/ L.� . ;; /� ,, � ; � .:3. , ' . : _ _ _ � `s` ' � '� 3.'S9.%... • � �� / �� Z^'r /�� ,, � � � � , . Y ' � c`i f/ . ,� ri•4G� • , _:.-- -� r=— - "-- �� . � , � t . �� I�� _ ' . �i � � i i �. - :.. � � i/�/f.i ♦� n+. O , 1i , . . . � '� : -�,= =o.: ��x-K;' iH2 ; 1329 �s �'�2'� �i � i ��'� : t�J�! ``t!�t ; � -.�� ,� - _�., ,: ,� :� .�� ,- 2�A,9� s �;� ._ ° �.r ` n n (�� 4 � i n . J oi - t 1 f�4'� - - -- - '. _ 11. �1i �c ._ —O � � �I�i�� Vi,L.1...11� �1�� 1%;�j�71n`i��\iY::Ji� � .__—�i . . �i�� . : "� �'a.s _f .'-� . .."�. . .: . �. � �^'Y,��• � '1 /faJ .� ✓` � 3 N v - } . .. � �i. ��. . : ; •. � � � �; � �a� � Li� j� .� `1 .,Q �� , ^� : "� �..- �°Lp �-1 -- ---�,�a� �37� /y <r> ��3 a �;y��;. � � ,�; . r 1 � ct. - ' 1 p ,�ra- '-< - 'r;;� � f', t �n r �R"� �22fOr v�i." . � . ' . ! y� — Z' . - -,J� s: -- '�,� i �'. . . : � �0 �_� <� --_ ", � � . G Z� r � 2 F3'3 - � - - -%=. . ' �z9 22.:� i�i� � F>j +. a � � � _ .� .? ,ti., >'r �'�, .- �2 (..�coi � � . t," ° ,.,, r �+ , . . . '� � � I .' � t. �r,9r.` C� R� i !f � � � . � . "� /��'�� +G.. _ � _ -/ � ' I � � .. 'C! Sf:^ . `y� . n', . . a. � . /� J .. - . . � . � � � e> � � n � / Z��. '> 3- d ;' •• �%--/�-j- --� y!') ; e. � � � � CU � � f :; . �- p � '��: � ti � ¢ �j I,/�/ i.,��:C:i . y , . �� .O'"t !^s� .•� a��` Sat �� r�e� 79 � � p (^� vW �).-��j / �0 f;�✓IS, i, r %'•'G/.;.v � � : � �� \ h �., -�.� ''l -y �k �� h i.0/,j0�7 y ', * 4 st u. L .'. � �. � s•�:. i , � �� , . . � '_� ".'—_ c � � �r��f ` ,0��\� �� . � . , . . .�: • . �' r .�. ,•---- 6z8 � y�� y f� ��'�� "L� ?° - i , ------ . .. . ...:.. _. .. --•- � � .: � �_ . • (q.�, �� .� (zGo� o�1, �!L✓ .• ��`(l�'� r � �.L�1 � r"� . `�= s:; ; �o Z J � N F%,) '' \ i \{%.+� � � `T n `' � � � .i_ '� c - �; 3�� -�,� 229 - � � ` �� <'� ` �C J � �r��- : r� lt - � �t . - � • a ,CU , '' > � : : ;�,,, �- � 2.yp � . " ;- (z % �.... -u��n4�u��nn��ni�n�n�u�un��nnn��n�� `� '� � c =. C� 2 N3 co ' •,�• �2 � ,� „ ' � � � � �, 7 `7 � _ , •• - - ..,.� � �'�:; � ��,. (,Z�F�� r.,(,s2`{� 4 l �'`� _��+s.� • • �2 3�G� � t �� 3: i a ' ` i� � ' � � � � " `" .. . � �\ ' .,,,_ �.(, 2g � � ,_ _ 3� -- �.� � � ; _ . t � � � �� -� f � 1: l a , " `_ ' . ;__._� . _ ,_.- _ . ---n : --- — - ; '• . I �t�� I��iie��lt�..' :.�� , �.'�.��' Z.�s c� _ _ ,r . . � , _. t� �. � - .,;�! =y � � �b' � y. N3 �\ r' � :. i �•' °'� ( �' �� G\�' ,��j�s � 3- � �. _ �. g � � `. , ,-• f� 1 \<��`�� 8 � � �m . � � ,^ ;._; . �" % U :, ��d��r�w. l � � --- � � �----- � _� :� � � � � ' � s ►�� -._�.� � �; `l�� , � , �O i o ' , � � � � ; , \ . � . . ., u:.y `A. . t` � �` (/, � �.��, � 2 � �- . ` . .— i'� ' _ '.r'.1.'7 _' i✓ • ; J.___ % f.'C/ •p Y�� . , ` . 5� ' �� ,^; �` A � •A �" . . �: O � 1� � I /� � ,_�..r�. � 1'�>._ ^ � ��Syi.�►�s° 7J�;,�''II� � m ` . _ 39�9 '_ '` �" �\� '1. 1' % ; � .i'� . � .?�. �r v3t `Q F �2 J13Z' _ � oo'f �- ��' ' � \�� i , m v . r (p ,r,, , ; :; � LCr •F '1l ;�, �'�� ' � � ^.' , .. '; . ;�. � � - r :,,� . � � 2 < �� • � . �z�,.1 _ . � i ,,,b , �, , ) � G�1' � .' � . � � � � ' " � , ��''� ti .`Y � � • , r1 � ' � � � i � '� `; � . l� .� . "�% ,� � e '; E,�; � . � i_ r; . � . LOT SPLIT APPLICATIQ� CITY OF FRIDLEY . ' � G� � , �.., � APPLICANT : �� ; -:" �- h c`z f_ r � . z ...� � 1` k=' � % ;,�t'�i- `� � :.( 'r S �r 2' ��-e� �� " �- ADDRESS: � � ' atreet �__, � Cii;y ; ' Zip Code T�L��orr� �� % � r'" '-� >��,� Hon�e Bue ine ss � � f =, ,� , f. � ,i � ]: / , . r .r _.. 4" , PROP�RTY 0 ��:�(S) ��; � �" --, ��-�,�- ,=��F"� • . , . t � ,� % s '. �� , < ,- : �'• , u . f� � �S �,� �,.,,..�.�, R, c7;,`�x tl�r:, o� I�pplicant' s 1Vame Lot Split r , 7y--v.�-� Date Filed: � Fee: ; Receipt � 9�'! Council Action:L�ate ��tAF�KS : ,� `�/ �; -�, , r/ `� %/f r I r7 Lt 1 �Y t� � � �~� �f `'"�-'�' ADDRESS( � },3 � -- �-- et TELEYHOiti'E �� S � Stree Home City `Lip Code Ci-L-y � Zip Code �3us ines s �. I'raperty Loc•4tion oz� �treet�� J „ , , . .�` �� ; / • .` i� � �i `=� v � ,µ. ' ,� � or Exact Stree'c �lddrees (IT AP1Y� - Le�a]. Descriptioiz of Property: % ( � � �, p � � f � lti d ? �U ,'�^ S ,. ) _: .�. �j � z ✓ �� 1 O l�% ��'� " , Reason for Lot Split: otal Are�. of ;.'z'op2?'ty�_�'�, sq . f t. � The underai�ned repreeentationa correct. �'re�ent Zoni.n�; Claseificatio.n _ �.... hereby decl�,res that all the facts and stated�in thie application axe true and DATE •, v� - � p - 7 �� SIGNATUR�' � ,�•c.l�z--`-✓" ' . � BFL041 FOR C1TY U5E OYI,Y (See �evere�o �ide for aciditior�i inetruetianra} ...�..�.��...�•......��.--�-�-�^� . � r--------- � PL11TS & SUBS ; Renu�cke : Date of Consideration - ^ . �. , PLANNI2IG COMMIS�S'IUN: DAte o� Canc�ideration - Remarks: . CITY COUNCILs Aate of Corisideration - ' Remarke: ,T . : r I � �� ..�-� �. � ` ��Sos �511;Ji5?��►SN_ � �'�5r h tb��'�:- �� BERNARD URBICK L,s. #74-02 \ . �twra � ,,,,, . `'. �`°` _. _ .�� t � t�� Split Lot 39, Auditor's Sub N0.92 - ,� ,�.: :� --��/�:: �� into four building sites ' -� . �- ' b� ' � o o � . ! o[�� ; �j�iG� � {5 � ��y� �� • �...��,-,� r �..:�r. : �•�� ' 7 \ . s . / � �`^ ('� '� ��'1 `y ; `, c�a �. ��j' „ �c,: i �� i� . %i . . ; __ ___ . __ _ ��; V 4.. L �`+ v L�. V � � � i ! c'r.:.7 � � - .J i;.!iJ� . �K; !� %{ /,` /� N- ty.. ' y a : �zo`ry �j�, � -- b' !^i ! Fi � � f � � � � � F(rl7' . /"� _ fj. f _ �iF.A:_� _.-il Q U� ; fF. ,.( �• �. ✓ �. � ii^c; .. - � V «. f;f:� �� ; ,, �:, ' ��.,ffW :.:� ; ,.;.� �: :.,.. �,. Sq : �- --� -I l�� ,� //��b� � :��,r ��;; �� OR�� f0�t..� � ;.-:�,, � : 1 ' �, � i •• . .." /p? ..._....••' � , - �37 ._. �; � 6 y� s .� �/� n f s �.:«� '�...• / ,4 ��??I 7�� '`�! � �,�_�1. ._, a,� q � � -��f��1i6� "` C'`j1I � �"4 iyi � /�:l� F � z ��'� � �'✓- �` � i : � � f . r � ' �+ � �. : f F � .r:.. t.` �'� :'�vr'.i. - i4 "' ° , ' �`� , r `� _"_ .__ . _'__ _— ^ ` 9 a?ry C i. fi ea'�v,e:�, q�� '�� `1•�� ' �! / iyl. of'. �b .. J //.3S.J .1j� � j , �� : n- �� ,E� �{ Y :y •t � I �JJO% r i �/divE� �,�U �� / , � 5 T � � , -- , �'}��j � � �'� .dr :. cr 1 -a:r..�„� r' s : f'.�a� i �i �! ��Ol . y � . .7 c �1 � (iisi h �u�j � e,,• `a ,� .'oa�� . . � �=�.vn, ,-"I;:. t. , �'�vei j . - � K�� --�—.,_-/`----- `��' : ti�oL yy�� i,5.�';�� /'�/'� �;� i �,z�,� i IG`��° ' ��.. �7�,�. z ' 01 ' � �,�y�� ..a �� e 'l �/`j / � � f w i , ��;n9 . i�� C . :�j-`--°-�.;f ,�t,n ,/w f/.�� ; ' L �� •, / � F/j . �' � ~ � �is r�cf �h� ,yi` v ' . . ! � i 1f�0) � 4 I � i �... � L o _ i.. �. i 1 �_�� 04/ C' `��.� ' /� 3.� � g— j Y. � ;r; M �ti:. � („ �� .. �� ' r /o.ici1,'..�i� °�64 `ti�'3 ti �i�f� ��-'� �'tf'v.. • 4 � /� S.l',I 8 �Io^) :oxy.�;ls �.�i r.�r ,��i� '� � �� . �°,��290).�: �{j� ('�20�� (/34Di , � J ^o. `,��, ;:. ��p,�:�,_ �►535 �..� �5a . 15� ;� �id�! ��.,��3�=��►.�N ��b��"� . �651 . r u�als - �1 _/ii/..^J .�fC �ovj/ � :� ' .,� . . t. ��.6 /��.� � :. _ v< .. j r j � r1�� ; ` ' . / ,131 j�� iJ3 3 ��r'�; — - -r:."t�fQ��lic �3"'`F-@.�:� -�\��`� .� 7 �..s�tm_�� •'- ��. m '.{..' � "� Ra� � r � *� f�°'I' <;ir�-. ��:k..�F � ..�F.. ',�� ; �b�1 `''��,�o►`� �,;`�°` t F � 6 - 5, -r---,S<. - __�_ _ , :�,e ` ' . .s ,,y � ''S3�-_ 5�►� � �� , ��y �� a 16z� :� ,: C6o�� ;�,6z�, /60 ,, ' �'.. � J .� 1 � �� f ` �l � �`• s• riie C: �J �,} �!.j ' ZS'�� ;,o�^-��tF�J r��k �� ``). � � ,�_� FF.reTl.i6`l� ��'(� 6 � �_"' _" ' ". f .._ _. -- � � � ' V . 1'` i . �. � � .. Jo o; h � 6IJ ,> ;... S I,. G h �`j J .r l,eyst� , e (, ) �-i'� � n� . ` 1i�FFo � v 1 ti " .<s_ i2'�snr ,9,:n z.�o j 4 t y � i Vr i ) . .1 � � e M y'��`j . ?' : � ro e,rY � �3' C-� �• C � 30 � 3G ' : it I., �' fr1 e; e = —� F ti � �� '----- 3 � � 3 ` � ' ', � �� °� i `' ' - �� ,%.�o, ; 29 � �j`�� 3 � � . �3` �; - �?_ i ://t9J'J :/'?w9} I Q j/ Q�� _ �'Sf o�. (�5eo) : ! . i,�' . ' � (Ritbir/./' .0 ! � \ � (:64�� \ � . �� . i ,---� � ��%c7�e.2' 4� � ��fv�/.>�: : ' `. ' 6 - / - � iy ' � S , \ � .S,��r`/rJ arc — — - -- --1 . �•• 1 ,5�• � 5g�O , ; .. ' �(1 h� , . � � � -e3.7G�� .---__ �' J."__�__....—_ .. --__... _. _. __ 1`_ __ : \ . tJ � k:...'; . .,�: � — ` � � ; � n \ � ,N � �,. � L�.2,'�94.;� soo-.�� , � . o ., � �_ � •I �.' . . . . �.♦ . �Y . � � ..i : .a. !E_�C.P.s'.±,,�6„�., v � " — GYeoJ ;; � ' (.s:�� '`._ : � !.9�J ' i .�,•�h ,e � , ' - ; �+z�� s ,e .Y;�is�� ti 4'O ; �=' (y�z� � f;� ` ,� � ; ��3? � , ' �zo� i 4�. . ' . , ' � ,�,� �J � �• �� ./%ti✓� � � � � }��6L f��EO/% , � ' � � ; , � —�., �. �e,� �so�, 58'�'� ` ,� �� T ` _ ^� � ��--;_ ____ ;,� � o � �� ; �� __C_ --'-----^--� I �2o3oJ � ' - ; � \ � 5Y80 � � u� ; . , �� ,,..� '. ' � c �t �- . � ., , .� - � . , ._. � �za.�Q> �:- . . . �� ;: �,� , � '., j �:zZZO, , s eo g�o r � ��., ,_ � _ ___5 � � : �Y ' � _ =� � .' 6 � , ., � � 7 ` t _ i '�ESCR /i iON at F.!'�.ti+ - , �/yI� 4 5 w � �" � � ` `�� ! 'h, ;'z2s.�/ u_: � "�' ' ' v, Q \ �� , � Q i �. ,•�V_• � � , !o � � . . � � � 1 ----- i � � � � `'•� _.iF'c.�� ' _ . . . . . , IBO 1/hSfiNfNT� ' .._ "._.___""___..�.__ . ` - t�.. _ "_ _ " � . . _�._____��..��__' '-..� �_�..._.�-��...._.��.. . . . f ..LIO'. - .. .'1..._-_' " _ . � �� . ... , • � . . ' i � _ . ., .._"_.+..._. _. .... ._ ._... � {; �. ; 5£�a9 ;J ; � .• . - _ ; -� :233 � I . . � � � � . . � � � � ' � 1 � � 1`` � + � . � '`; � � . . 'vi . ; Z-:��.)j ♦ � . '� � \ ' '� ; � �� q ,� � � ,� O � ,, � ,� ('2490i� ,�` � . . i�?_S'JJ . , i .,/ ; : . . 5 2 :; .� �� ; M , . , ; ' •� l , ., , � � c � , —�— , �_ . � �, , � . ,+ . E � ?•; ; � • , : ` � 1 � , �� ,`� j�' , � , ,. ' �' ' j � �` � _ �. - . 1� � ' ( E //4 CL`fr� n 3 �— I i 1 � ; � i �� r�`5 O Q � c� i ' � W n� _ . �.Y.. a ", � o�. c* w �1' -.1 t- � 32� BERNARD L1'RBTCK L.S. #74-02 Split Lot 39, A.S. #92'into 4 building sites . ��'� �. r 0 y W � � � t� H H O � � � � c� � F-I � H � H O � H � � � �