The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 02/19/1975 - 7507�°t' PLANNING COM�ISSION MEETING CITY OF FRIDLEY AGENDA FEBRUARY 19, 1975 CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: APPROVE PLANNING COMf�ISSION MINUTES: JANUARY 22, 1975 8:00 P.M. - PAG ES 1 - 11 RECEIVE THE JOINT MEETING OF CITIZEN BIKEWAY, PLANNING COMMISSION, 12 - 13 AND PARKS & RECREATIUN MINUTES: JANUARY 7, 1975 RECEIVE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: JANUARY 20, 1975 RECEIVE BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SCIBCOMMITTEE MINUTfS: JANUARY 23, 1975 . RECEIVE BOARD OF APPEALS SUBCOMMITEE MINUTES:' JANUARY 28, 1975 1. CONTINUED: PUBLIC HfARTNG: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP,'#74-17, BY GEORGE WALQUiST: To permit the construction of �a duilding for rust-proofing of automobiles, etc., per Fridley City Code, Section 205.131, (A,10), in an M-1 zone (light in- dustrual areas) to be located on Lot 5, of proposed plat, P.S. #74-08, the same being 1271 Rice Creek Raad N.E. Public Hearing open. No aetion needed. 2. CONTINUED: PUBL.IC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A REzONING REQUEST, ZOA #74-05, BY RAO MANUfACTURING COMPANY: To rezone from C-2S, general shopping areas to M-1 light industrial areas), Lots 3- 15, Lots 27 - 32, and parts of Lots 2 and 16, a11 in Block 9; vacated alleys in Block 9; and the East Half of vacated Main Street lying adjacent to Block 9, all being in Lowell Addition to Fridley Park., the same be�ng 200 Mississippi Street N.E. 14 - 17 18 - ZO 21 - 25 26 - 37 Public Hearing closed. 3. REQUEST FOR A LOT SPLIT, L.S. #75-01, DEAN HARMON: Split off 38 - 40 the Easterly 8 feet off the North 1/3 of Lot 4, except the East 85 feet, except the West 25 feet, and except the North � 30 feet for public utilities & street, Auditor's Subdivision . $� p No. 108, (�.Parcel 440) and add it to the East 85 feet of the .� ��v�� North 1/3 of Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No. 1Q8, (Parcel � ` `,� 450), the same being 1600 and 1618 Onondaga Street N.E. , N' �'i �� ADJQURNMENT: � - ♦. � ..+• WORKSHOP MEETING OF THE PLANNING CQMMISSION WILL BE ON MARCH 1Q, 1975. , `� CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING CUMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 22, 1y75 PAGE 1 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Fitzpatrick calied the meeting to order at 8:05 P.M. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Fitzpatrick, Harris, Blair, Drigans, Langenfeld Members Absent: Lindblad Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, Planning Assistant Darrel Clark, Community Development Administrator APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: DECEMBER 18, 1974 MOTION by Harris, seconded by Bl:air, that t.�e Planning Corrvr►ission minutes of December .IB, 1974 be approved as written. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVE BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CUNTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: DECEMBER 19, 1974 MOTION b�,Drigans, seconded by B1air, that the Planning Commission receive the minutes of the Building Standards-Design Control Subcommittee meeting of December 39, 1974. Upon a voice vote, a11 votinq aye, the motion carried unanimously. � RECEIVE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: DECEMBER 23, 1974 MOTION by B1air, seeonded by Harris, that the Planning Commission receive the minutes of the Parks & Recreation Commission Subcommittee meeting of December 23, 1974. Upon.a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the m�otion carried unanimously. RECEIVE BUILDING STANUARDS-DESIGN CIINTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: JANUARY 9, 1975 MOTION b� Harris, seconded by Drigans, that the PZanning Commission receive the minvtes of the Builaing Standards-Design Control Subcommittee meeting of January 9, I975. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVE BOARD OF APPEALS SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: JANUARY 14, 1975 MOTION by Drigans, seconded by B1air, that the Planning Commission receive the minutes of the Board of Appeals Subcommittee meeting of January 14, 1975. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. REGEIVE PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS-STREETS & UTILITIES SUBCUMMITTEE MINUTES: JANUARY 15 1y75 _ . MOTION by Harris, seconded by Drigans, that the Planning Commission receive the minutes of the P1ats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee of January 15, 1975. Upon a voice vote, a1I votinq aye, the motion carried unanimously. �. f 1. CONIINUED• PUBLIC HEARING• REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMI7, SP #74-17, BY GEORGE WALQUIST: To permit the construction of a building for rust-proof�,ng of automobiles, etc., per Fridley City Code, Section 2U5.131, (A,10� in an M-1 zone (light industrial areas) to be located on proposed Lot 5 of a proposed plat, P.S. 0 P)anning Commission Meeting - January 22, 1975 Page 2 #74-U8, Herwal Rice Creek Terrace, the same being 1271 Rice Creek Road N.E. Public Hearing open. Mr. Boardman said the petitioner had notified the staff that the developer of this property lived in Detroit, and would not be present for this meeting. He requested that this request be continued until such time as the developer would be available to answer questions regarding the operatian of this business. MOTION by Drigans, seconded by Blair, that the Planning Commission rontinue the request for a Special Use Permit, SP #74-17, by George Walquist, to permit the con- struction of a building for rust proofing of automobiles, etc., per Fridley City Code, Sectzon 205.131 (A,10) in an M-1 zone (Iight industrial areas) to be located on Lot 5, of a proposed p1at, P.S. #74-08, Herwal Rice Creek Terrace, the same being 1271 Rice Creek Road N.E., until the petitioner can have the developer of this property appear before the Planning Commission. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 2. PU�LIC HEARING: GONSIDERATION OF A REZONING RE UEST, ZOA #74-05, BY RA0 MANUFAC= � TURiNG COMPANY: To rezone from C-2S general shopping areas to M-1 light-indus- ' trial areas), Lots 3-15, Lots 27-32, and part of Lots 2 and 16, all in Block 9; vacated alleys in Block 9, and the East half of vacated Main Street, lying adjacent to Block'y, all being in Lowe11 Addition to Fridley: Park, the same being 2U0 Mississippi Street N.E. , Chairman Fitzpatrick read the Public Hearing notice, for the rezoning request, ZOA #74-05, by RAO Manufacturing Eompany. ^ Mr. Robert A. Olson, Sr., Chairman of the Board, Mr. Robert A. Olson, Jr.;, President, and Richard A. Olson, Jr., Vice President, all of RAO Manufacturing Company were present. Mr. Richard Olson said that RA0 Manufacturing Company was a corporation engaged mainly in the manufacture of sheet metal stampings, deep drawings, stamp and assemblies, along with tool and die making, engineering and related items to this process. In 1970 we purchased approximately 5 acres at 200 Mississippi Street N.E. We went ahead with preliminary soil samples, etc., and also approached the Fridley City Council for land use approval, which was granted. At that time we mentioned that approximately half � this property was zoned commercial and that it would have to be rezoned industrial for our use: The Council had no objectian ta this rezoning. He said they had been trying to demolish the old buildings on this land and they have run into some problems with this, but we hope to have it completed very shortly. We are planning to start construc- tion on this property this spring with completion within six months. We alsa have a purchase agreement of a pie shaped wedge of approximately 68 feet that was west of their property, along the railroad right-of-way. He said this was part of Block 7, Lowell Addition to Fridley Park and was about 3/4 of an acre that is zoned M-1. He said they were proposing to construct a building of about 50,000 square feet which is 200 feet by 240 feet by 20 feet high. It would be built basically in the center of the property, 220 feet fram the Easterly boundary of the property. The reason for building at this location was because of•the underpass project on Mississippi Street, which will limit our access to the building to the Easterly portion of the property. Any future expansion of this building would be to the West. He presented a colored rendering of the proposed metal building which he said would have earthy colors. � Mr. Boardman said they did'have an option on the location of the building. T,f for some reason, the rezoning was denied, they could locate the building on property Planning Commission Meetinq - January 22, 1975 Page 3 that was already zoned M-1 and use the C-2S zoned property for parking. He said � it would be better to have the proper�ty all under one zoning, for resale purposes and because it would also be easier to administer. Mr. Robert A. Olson, ar., said the only way they would want to use this property was if it all had the same zoning. The property wouldn't have the same potential otherwise. Ne said the proposed 50,000 square foot building could be expanded to 100,000 square feet if this property was all M-1. If they could only build on the property that was presently zoned M-1, they could only expand their building to 75,000 square feet. He said the main reason for moving their business from Minneapolis to this location was so that they would have room for expansion. Mr. Harris asked Mr. Boardman that if this property was expanded to its maximum, would there be enough room for parking? Mr. Richard Olson answered Mr. Harris. He said their present plan called for 57 stalls. Under the City Code we would need 52 stalls, and if this 50,000 square foot building was �sed to the maximum, we would need 63 stalls: On this same drawing, we have provision for up to 100 stalls. If we went to the maximum of 100,000 square feet, we would need 165 stalls. This would all be on the Easterly portion of the lot. We do have room on the West for additional parking. He said they knew they had to provide additional parking as they expanded the building, so their expansion would be somewhat determined by this factor. He said he couldn't foresee expanding this property to its maximum in his lifetime, and who knew what mass transit there could be at that time, which could change parking requirements. Mr. Harris asked what the setback requirements would be from adjoining properties? i'`� Mr. Boardman said the property ta the West was industrial (M-1� ahd the building m et the requirement there. South of the property was zoned R-3, and it meets the setback requirement for that zoning. East of the proper�y the zoning'was C-2S, and it met the setback requirements. He said there was some R-1 property across from part of the front of the building, so the entire setback for the front of the building should be l00 feet. RAO Manufacturing Company will be going to the Board af Appeals for a front yard variance from 100 feet to 70 feet. Mr. Baardman said it was felt that Mississippi Street was a . natural barrier between this property and the R-1 and would act as a buffer. If the variance was granted, we felt it was better to have this variance on the front setback rather than the rear yard so the building wouldn't infringe on the R-3 zoning. Mr. Boardman continued that RAO would be using berming and landscaping across from the R-1 zoning which would be an additional buffer. � Mr. Robert A. Olson, Sr. said he felt this was a very unique piece of land. In view of the fact that Mississippi Street was going into an underpass situation, the only access to all this property was on the Eastern end. It was a good thing for the City to have this property under one ownership because of this one access. He said there wasn't even access to service the sanitary sewer line on this property from the str�et:` He said RA0 Would provide access for tNtis purpose. He said that no way would RA0 .want' go ahead with the development of this property, with all the money it would cost for its development, and take a chance on getting it all the same zoning at a future date. He. said that at the tirre they acquired this property, there weren't any plans to upgrade Mississippi Street. Mr. Drigans asked how the access to this property was laid aut in relationship � to ihe underpass? Mr. Boardman �said he thought there was about a four foot drop over the entire parking lot, and about a 2 foot drop from the parking lot to the street. The grade starts to drop on Mississippi Street in the vacinity of 2nd Street. Mr. Clark said there would be about a 1% grade from the street into the parking lot of RAO. He Planning Commission Meeting - January 22, 1975 Page 5 ___ � Nasim Qureshi, who was City Engineer at the time, and the members of the City Council � did visit our plant, and they were satisfied at that time tfiat this would be the proper zoning. Whether the present Council would agree with that would be something else. l'1 Mr. Harris asked Mr. Clark to get an opinion from the City Attorney on this question, and get the answer in writing. Mr. Clark said that he would. MOTION b� Drigans, seconded by Harris, that the Planning Commission continue until February 5, 1975, the consideration of a rezoninc}'equest, ZOA #74-05, by RAO Manufacturing Company, to rezone from C-2S (general shapping areas) to M-1 (3ight industriaZ areas) Lots 3-15, Lots 27-32, and part of Lots 2 and 16, a11 in B1ock 9, along with vacated alleys in B1ock 9, and the East half of vacated Main Street lying adjacent to Block 9, a11 being in Lowe11 Addition to Fridley Park, the same being 200 Mississippi Street Northeast, to provide the administration time to research the interpretation of the Ianguage of the Code. Upon a voice vote, alI voting aye, the motian carried unanimously. � Mr. Robert A. Olson, Sr. said he thought it was in the best interest of RAO� Manufacturing Company to have this clarified also. . Mr. Clark said they could sti11 go to the Board of Appeals and Building Standards- Design Control meetings as scheduled. They could make their recommendations subject to the rezoning being approved. ' 3. PUBLIG HEARING: CONSIDERATION_OF A PROPOSED PLAT, P.S ��_m 1'Ull{VL♦ [..��v nvva � av�� ... ..�..... . � ...,.. . i_- -- ---.� -� - .. 12, City of Fridley, Coun�y of Anoka, Minnesota, generally Gentral Avenue and Highway #65 N.E., North of 73.1J2 Avenue CENTRAL VIEW 780. Section located N.E. 4. � PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING RE UEST, ZOA #75-01, CENTRAL AUTO PARTS: To rezone from C-2S general shopping areas to M-1 light industrial areas all that part of Parcel 4780, Section 12, City of Fridley, that lies between the Northerly extensions of the East and West lines of Lot 10, Block 1, Central View Manor, generally located just North of 1201 73 1/2 Avenue N.E. 5. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #75-01, CENTRAL AUTO PARTS: Per Fridley City Code, Section 205.131, (A,8 to allow junk yards or baling of junk or rags in a building enclosed on all sides or when completely enclosed with a solid fence, to be located on that part of 4780, Section 12, City of Fridley, that lies between the Northerly extension of the West line of Lot 10 and the East line of Lot 16, Block 1, Central View Manor, to allow expansion of the boundaries of Central Auto Parts, 1201 73 1/2 Avenue N.E. Mr, Gus Doty of Realco, Inc., and Mr. John Buzick of Central Auto Parts were present. Mr. Clark said these three requests should be considered together, because if the rezoning and special use permit aren't appraved, there would be no reason to plat this property. . � Chairman Fitzpatrick read the Public Hearing notices on the proposed plat,' P,S, #75=01, Central View Manor 2nd Addition, by ReaYco, Inc., the rezoning reques�, ZOA #75-01, to rezone from C-2S to M-1, and the request for a Special Use Permit, SP #75-01, by Central Auto Parts, all pertaining to all ar part of Section 4780, Section � 12, City of Fridley, whichlies between Central Avenue��ind Highway #65 N.E., North of Planninq Commission Meeting January 22, 1975 Page 6_ 73 1/2 Avenue N.E. � ' n Mr. Clark said the land that was being platted was split in half a couple of years ago, at the zoning line by the now defunct American Auto LTStings, The East portion of the property wa�s occupied by Gustafson Grinding, and the balance of the property was vacant. Parcel 4780 was only 140 feet deep and 1,33� feet lonq. Mr. Doty Wanted to have another lot split pn:this.propew�y�which would have divided this parceT into three parts, but as you can tell from the Public Hearing notices, there would have been lengthy Yegal descriptions. He said he advised the petitioner to plat the property instead. This request was before the Plats & Subdivi.sions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee on January 15th and they recommended approval with three sti�ulations which were (1) Provide a 15 foot drainage and utility easement along the Northerly portion of Lot 2, and on the North-South line between Lots 2 and 3, and along the South portion of Lot 3, (2) This approval subject to the rezoning r�equest, ZOA #75-01, and a request for a Special Ose Permit, SP #75-01, by Central Auto Parts, being approved, and (3} A private covenant be put on Lot 2 so that this said Lot 2, Central V�ew Manor 2nd Addi'tion, could on�y be sald to adjacent property owners who already have street access. Mr. C1ark'said this last stipulation was to prevent Lot 2 being sold as an isolated lot that didn't have street access. The petitioner was agreeable to these stipulations. Mr. Clark continued, saying that Central Auto Parts, the tentative purchaser , of Lot 2 of the proposed plat, has requested that the Westerly 60 feet of this lot be rezoned the same as the balance of Lot 2, which was"M-1, and that a Special Use Permit be granted for all of the new Lot 2, so they can expand their salvage yard, He said that the City has had some problems with Central Auto Parts, most of them due to the fact that they didn'�t have enough space for their operation: Their business has ^ grown faster than they anticipated, so the addition of Lot 2, should solve most of . their problems. They would have to discontinue parking damaged and partially dis- mantled cars in their parking lot, which was supposed to be for customer parking, and using property across the street, which they don't own, for parking. Their business would have to be canfined to their own property, with a screening fence. Nir. Clark said the staff had prepared a list of stipulations for the Planning Commission to consider in making their recommendation on the Special Use Permit. The � fir�t ane was that there must definitely be a screening fence. The second was, that especially along the portion t��at abuts the trailer park, there should be at least a l.0 foot pl�ant�ing strip, like an evergreen hedge.� outside and adjacent to other zoned praperty, to be completed by July 1, 1975. The third stipulation was that all storage, unloading and loading of inoperative vehicles be confined within the screening fence. (4) That parking of trucks, loaded or empty, be restricted to the area inside the �fenced lot, (5) That all dismantling or parts salvage be done inside the existing building, (6) No vehicle parking be allowed in the street or on any other land that is not authorized by the City Council or the City. The last stipulation, number 7, was that this permit be for a period of time, to expire on July 31, 1976, and not be renewed unless all of the above stipulations were complied wfith. Mr. Clark said the reason the staff felt this should have a yearly review was because this hasn't worked out the way we thought when the original Special Use Permit was granted. There are three ways the petitioner can go with this operation. Either reduce his operation or move oui, or acquire more land for this operation. Mr. Clark said that Central Auto Parts owned Lots 10-15, Block l, in Central �'1 View Manor. Mr. Fitzpatrick said that was wfiy they were requesting the rezoning of the Westerly 60 feet of Lot 2 then, sa it would be the same zoning. Mr. Clark said that tot 2 wa5 in line with Lots 10-16, but Lot 15 belongs to another salvage yard. Mr. Clark said there were a couple of other comments he would like to make. Planning Commission Meeting - January 22, 1975 7 He said the stipulation by the 6uilding Standards-Design Control Subcommittee on the � � ori inal request for a Special Use Permit was for a Wfenceenci� Waserighteonhthehproperty � 9 is not a wooden ane. It was an 8 foot high screening F line, and we would like to see this aean?tmlaok ascifsthererwas�muchbrighteof wayf�n � some plantings. Mr. Harris said it � this area: Mr. Clark said there_whs a�n60heoo�opegty-linea�anduthat'sewhattmadedit look � seeing an eight foot structure rig t P � so close. Mr. Fitzpatrick asked if there was�ra anscaskedtwhopownedtLotssl6�f lgntrM�• � Auto Parts? Mr. Clark said there was. Mr. g Doty said this belonged to Fridley Auto Parts and that their fence was right in the property line also. Mr. Clark said he would have to:eSlasthaearhand aahalfeunderlthe�neweownershhp. opertaion of Central Auto Parts in th itsyoperation also. He said Fridley Auto Body has cleaned up Chairman Fitzpatrick said he thought they shouhave�street accesseliminary plat first, and be aware that Lot 2 in this plat did not , Mr. Harris said the reason for the stipulation that thVeet�esa�ot�change�ownert t on Lot 2 was because-we didn't want, at a future date, 'to ha � ship to someone who didn't already have street access because the City could be placed � in a position of liaving to condemn street-right-of-way for this praperty. Mr. Drigans asked why the property now owned by Cen1eaalAcom licationslbecause � be included in the replatting? Mr, Doty said there were g P � ^ of mortgaqes, etc., whieh would make this ee�eestiyulatingufor this �otywas�legaldorn't know if the type of private covenant they w P not, but it would ha�e a limit ofA2�o Parts, he couldnetWSee,that ittwould�beuconsidered this Lot 2 was a part of Central u owned as a separate property again• feitwouMdn�Doty saidi theeonlynreasonitheyewerepplatting by Central Auto Parts went for this property was to facilitate the sale of Lot 2 to Central Auto Parts. Mr. Clark said that if the City was put in a posess�toWLote2,tth�slwouldeall. go through condemnation proceedings to give street acc be assessed back to Lot Z. _ Mr: Doty said he was sure that Central Auto Peras r°vatebeasementbover�theing_ Lot 2 to their property and maybe they could provid p East half of Lot 15, so that if this lot did go tax forfeit, there would be street access. Mr. John Buzick, Central Auto Parts� O�ne heas�heddidnwtnknow whaterepercussions. until he had talked ta his partner and his att Y, . there could be from this. Mr. Clark said thsteasement wasCg}venl becauserit wouldno�ned Lot 2, there would be no problem even if thi be used for an access to Lot 2• HarrisWSaid this wouldsbeua�privateedrivewayteasement. � had to sell this property. Mr- Mr. 6uzick said he had no ob�ection to most of the stipulations m�ntioned by Mr. Clark but when it came to moving the fence in on the fron�oWlnt�therepexcept weeds. he said there was soerecWasasandhallhoveruthe'Citye andttheregwouldghave to be some - � Mr. Boardman said th topsoil put in under the sod. Me said nothing grows if its just put on top of the sand. �� Planninq Cammission Meetinq - January 22, 1975 Page 8 Mr. Buzick said that if they had to move the fence in, they would be losing narea again, and he thought they needed all the area they could get. He said the reason they didn't put in the wood fence was because it was against State regulations to have a wooden fence for this type of operation. Mr. Doty said that as long as the fence for Fridley Auto was on the property line alsa, he thought it was a little premature to expect Central Auto Parts to move their fence at this time. He felt that as long as this Special Use Permit was going to be subject to yearly review, this could be taken care of at a later time, Mr. Harris said they could wait for the natural screer,ing between the C-2S zoning and the M-1 zaning until the C-2S property was developed. He said the screening fence should be brought in from the property line in this area also so the plantings could be put in at a later time, without moving the fence. He said the natural screening (plantings) should be started along the R-4 zoning during this years growing season. . 'MOTION by Harris, seconded by Blair, that the Planning Commzssion close the Public Hearing on the proposed p1at, P.S. #75-01, Central View Manar 2nd Addition, ,by W. Gustave Doty. Upon a voice vote, a11 voti=.g aye, the motion carried unanimousZy. MOTION by Drigans, seconded by Harris, that the Planning Commision recommend ta Council approval of the proposed p1at, P.S. #75-OI, Central View Manor 2nd Addition, by W. Gustave Doty, being a replat of Parcel 4780, Section 12, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota, generalZy Iocated between Centra.Z Avenue'and Highway #65 N.E., North of 73 1/2 Avenue N.E., with the following stipulations: 1. Provide a IS foot drainage and utilit� easerrrent along the Northerly portion � of Lot Z, and cin the North-South line between Lots 2 and 3, and along the /1 South portion of Lot 2. . 2. Approval of this pZat is subject to the rezoning request, ZOA #75-01, and the request for a.Special Use Permit, SP #75-0Z, both requests by CentraZ Auto Parts, being-approved. 3. Subjecf to a 30 foc�t grivate easement being granted from 73 Z/2 Avenue N.E, to Lot 2, so this Iot wauld have street aecess if ever needed. UPON a voice vote, a13 voting aye, the motion'carried unanimousiy. MOTION by Drigans, seconded by B1air, ttiat the Planning Conm�ission close the Public Hearing on the rezoning request, ZOA #75-Q1, by Central Auto Parts. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.' 1�10TION b�} Drigans, seconded by Blair, that the Planning Commission recommend to Coancil approval of the rezoning request, ZOA #7'5-OI, by Central Auto Parts, to rezone from C-ZS (genera2 shopping areas) to M-1 (light industrial areas), a11 that part of Farcel 4780, Section 12, City of Fridley, that lies between the NortherZy extension of the East and West lines of Lot I0, B1ock 1, Central View Manor, generally located just North of 1201 73 1/2 Avenue N.E., subject ta the approval of a Special Use Permit, SP #75-01, for Central Auto Parts. Upon a voice vote, aZ1 votinq aye, the motion carried unanimously. � MOTION by Blair, seconded by Harris, that the Planning Commissian close the - � Public Hearing on the request for a Special Use Permit, SP #75-01, by Central Auto Parts. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motian carried unanimously. � _- � � ^ Planninq Commission Meetinq January 22, 1975 Page 9 Mr. Buzick said he wouldn't want to agree that no dismantling at all would be done outside the building., Sometimes someone needs a daor or some other part for a rusM job, and although they don't like to dismantle outside, in an emergency they do it. He said that he would agree that no major dismantling be done outside the building. The Planning Commission members agreed to this, on an emergency basis. Mr. Clark said he would have no objection as long as this didn't cause noise pollution. He said they could monitor the operation, and check this stipulation at the time of renewal of this Special Use Permit. Mr. Clark said he thought the review of-this Special Use Permit should be during the growing season, rather than a year from today. If they should recommend more fencing or plantings at that time, it would be easier to comply with at that time of the year. MOTION by. Drigans, seconded by B1air, that the Planning Comrrrission recommend to Council approval of the request for a Special Use Permit, SP #75-01, by Central Auto Parts, per Fridley City Code, Section 205.13I (A,8), to a11ow junk yards or baling of junk or rags, in a building enclosed on a11 sides, or when completly enclosed with a soZid fence, to be .Zocated on the part of Parcel 4780, Section 12, City of Fridle�, that?j�s_hetween the Northerly extension of the West line of Lot 10 and the East Iine of Lot 16, B1ock 1, Central View Manor, to allow expansion of the boundaries of Central Auto Parts, 1201 73 1/2 Avenue N.E., with the following stipulations: 1. Provide an 8 foot screening fence, 10 feet from the property 1ine. 2. Provide a 10 foot planting strip outside this fence. The planting strip --::�on the North property line ao�jacent to the R-� zoning, to be planted in the 1975 growing season. The planting strip adjacent to the C-2S zoned property along the West side of Lot 2, Central View Manor 2nd Addition, and along the West side of Lot 10, Block I, Central View Manor, to be determined at the time of the review of the Special Use Permit, dependent upon the development of the C-2S zoned property. ' 3. A11 storage, unloading and Zoading cif inoperable vehicles be confined inside the screening fence. � 4. Parking of trucks, Ioaded or empty, be xestricted to the area inside the fenced 1ot. , • 5. A11 major dismantling be done inside the existing building. • 6. No vehicle parking in the street or on any other unauthorized area be allowed. 7. This Special Use Permit will expire and be up for renewal on Ju1y 31, 1976 and wi1Z not be renewed unless a11 of the above stipulations have been;:satisfied UPON a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the mbtion carried unanimously. 6. DISCUSSION: � Mr. Clark said they would like to keep a light meeting of February 5, 1975 so this could be used as Jerry Boardman was scheduled for another meeting on attending this meeting. ._.. _ agenda for the Planning Commission a workshop meeting. He said that that date, and would not be � Planning Commission Meeting - January 22, 1975 Paqe 10 Mr. Clark said he hadn't been aware of posting Public Hearing notices three days in advance of the meeting, but he would�see that they were posted, so'they wouldn't have to be read. NOTE: Upon checking, the City Charter only says ordinances and resolutions have to be read. It was the Council's decision to post these three days prior to the meeting so they could waive the reading. There is no requirement to read the Public Hearinq notice on anything e1se. Therefore, there shouldn't be a motion to waive the reading of the Public Hearing notice: Instead there should be a motion to open the Public Hearing, stating the time, and a motion to close the Public Hearing, sta�ing the time. ' Mr. Harris said he had attended the special Couneil meeting on Saturday, January 18th. He said members of the Chamber of �ommerce were present and voiced some dis- satisfaction with the City. He said he invited them to send a representative to the Planning Commission workshop meetings as we were working on the City Code. :He.as.ked the secretary to notify Mr. Dunn that the workshop meeting this month would be on February 5th. Mr. Langenfe1d said he had some comments on the joint meeting with the Bi�keway Committee, Hg�� some basic eoncerns, which were: ` '.G��~'�' 1. Safety �;��"`'� G-�2�-�' �� 2. If this Committee decides to tax the indivi.dual,.� thought it would be- no deal. � 3. Public lighting / 4. Proper'�notification to �ndividual residents �,�� 5. Check sources of imanediate funding to see where,,w� would stand on a Class I project � 6. He thought they should stick to Phase I and check more thoraughly with the railroad, because this was a`major problem Mr. Langenfeld said he did learn a lot at this meeting, and wanted to thank the Chairman for the invitation. Mr. Drigans asked that copies of the minutes of this meeting be made available for the Planning Commission. Mr. Harris said he agreed with Mr. Langenfeld's concerns and thought that it came down to how this would be paid for. He said it could be paid for out of property taxes, or they did have some other alternatives, but whether 'those alternatives would be available with our present economy, might be in some doubt. Mr. langenfeld said that according to the figures given at the meeting, the bikeway wouid cost $321,�80. It was broken down into five phases and Phase I would cost $62,000, so we are talking about a lot of money. Mr. Urigans asked if there had been a priority set up as to what would come first, � the bikeways or the walkways. Mr. Clark said Phase I was the bikeways. Mr. Urigans said he felt that more people could use walkways than bikewa�s. Mr. Blair said that when you were talking about that mucfi rnoney, he felt the City had need for other things, such as an activity center. Planninq Commission Meetinq January 2Z, 1975 Page 11 Mr. Narris mentioned the Civic Center at Brooklyn Center. Most of the members /"1 said someone from their family had used this facility and were familiar with it. Mr. Harris that this center wasn't anything fancy, but it was a very functional building. Mr. Harris said thE Bikeway Committee started out with a survey. They found there were 28 neighborhoods in Fridley with no cohesive force to pull them together. We don't have one school district. There is no common denominator in the City of Fridley. Mr. Langenfeld said he thought that one of the purposes of the bikeway was to eradicate the natural and man-made barriers. Mr. Harris said that a civic center, or youth center, or whatever you want to call it, could make a focal point. Mr. Drigans said the property that the Wal1 Corporation owns would�be a good location for something like this; because the library was already at that location. /'1 Mr. Harris said the problem was to find funding for this purpose. Mr. fitzpatrick said Fridley had a great need for indoor recreation facilites. Mr. Drigans said it seemed to him that we could get some of these things, like an indoor swimming pool and an-activity center, along with the armory. He felt there should be a study made on how much it would cost us to have an armory large enough to have it combined with a youth center, indoor swimming and/or other indaor recreation. Mr. Blair said he felt this would be the easiest way for Fridley to get these facilities. He said the indoor armory parade ground could be used for an indoor gymnasi�um. Mr. Clark said the Council would be having a Public Hearing an the armory proposal on February lOth. Mr. Drigans said he thought funds should be made available to have an arhitect come up with some alternate plans for what Fridley might want to incl�de in an armory. Mr:• Blair�said there should be plans from other armories where they had combined facilities. Mr. Fitzpatrick said there probably were, but at their meetings on the armory, they didn't hear of anyplace that had extensive i�door recreation. Mr. Clark said the City could have almost anything they wanted in an armory, but they would have to be willing to pay for it too. Mr. Drigans said that if it was something that the National Guard could use also, the State would share in this cost, but not the Federal Government. He said he thought the armory proposal was at the Cauncil level prematurely, and should probably be referred back ta the Planning Commission. Mr. Clark said it would depend upon how the Council feels about a youth center. If they aren't in favor of this, then it goes back to just being an armory proposal. Mr. Drigans said the armory could be a dual purpose building, and this might make it more palatable to the commanity. ADJOURNMENT: ' MOTION by B1air, seconded by Harris, that the meeting be adjourned. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,_Chairman Fitzpatrick declared the Planning Commission meeting of January 22, 1975 adjourned at 11:20 P.M. Respectfully submitted, �.� Z��tct�'r�/ � Dorothy Evens , Secretary . , JOINT MEETING OI� �2,' CYTIZEN BIKCWAY, PLANNING COMMISSION, & PARKS AND 1tECREATION CONA�fISSION January 7, 1975 MEMBERS PRES�NT; Bill Gerads, Dennis Schneider, Vern Moen, Bobbi Spaeth, Lee Houck, Jerry Boardman, Jan Thomas, Sgt. Wilkinson, and Be tte Papke OTHERS PRESENT: Richard Harris, Jim Langenfeld, Hubert Lindblad, and ShirJ.ey Caldwell Chairman Vern Moen opened the meeting at 7;42 p.m. � , Jerry Boardman said the idea of hav.ing a joint meeting with the Pl.anning � Commission and Parks Commission members was to find out their views on the Bikeway system. He explained that the bookle'- which he gave to everyone included the goals and objectives of the comm�ttee, past minutes, and information relating to the syste:n. Mr. Moen said the system was set up according to different sta�es, Stages 1 being pilot bikeway,system. Stage 2 would involve tping the system in together. Stage 3 would further complete and extend it as would Stages 4 and 5. Mr. Harris asked how much Stage Z will cost? Mr. Boardman said the entire � package was estima.ted at �321,OOOa The cost would be approximately $62,422 � for phase 1. The Cotal estimate on county roads was $8,900 with $3,535 worth of signs, totaling to $I2,525. Tize estimate of city roads were $5,020, $2,946? for signs totaling to $8,460. Mr. Baardman went over some of the goals of the committee including safety, high recreationaZ potential use, providing another mode of transportation, environmental and ecological considerations, flexioility, promoting public awareness, etc. 1�1r. Boardman said the sidewaLk system and the bilceways system would be t�ao different proposals but proposed in the same booklet, Stage l would be developed as mostly on-street lanesa They studied and discussed Phase 1. Mr. Boardman showed diagrams of alternatives other cities had used in setting up their lanes on-street, consisting of a bike lane on a one way streeC, bike lanes with no parking, bike lane with curb divider, bzke Iane with curb and parking, The committee discussed the nse of the system and the subject of banning parking. Mr. Harris said it would be invaluable to invest this much money if the system was used only 6 or 7 months a year. Mr, Boardman said the system would be used definitely more than that, many people would use bicycling as a modes of transportation in the winter if �here were access. Mr. Harris questioned how the bikeways would be maintairced. Mr. Boardman said i,t would be maintained by the City, Mr. Harris said this would adcI to the estimated cost. Mr. Boardmun presented the funding possibilit-�es; (1) Grants and�Aid Program �^ (2) Latwcon - SO% £ederal, 25% state, 25%, local (3) Community Development Block Grants throu�h the development of IIUD (4) rederal Aid Urb�n (S) MSAS - Minnesota State A�d SCreets (6) Revenue sharins monies (7) help from community services organizations (8) bicycle licensing fees (9) Donations:(10) Issue Bonds 7 � (11) Streers And Traffi.c Conwrol �u��eC (12) Park und Recreation Budget � 3 (13) O�lier budget monies 41iaL• could Ue ull.ocated (l�E) CounCy participation on County roads. }le said the next two sr.af;es. the conunitCee must cover including funclin�; is 1ega1, whaC kind oi law ehanges must be made to malce a.sater system, � and other essential Chings relaCed to thc bikeway system. Mr, llarris aslced Mr. Boardman wliich w�re the best estimates of how the system would be funded. Mr. P.oardman said probably through MSAS, County parCicipation, Streets and Traffic ConCrol Ludset, Parks and Recreation'Budget, and com.�nunity service organizaL-ions. Mr. FIarris thouglit it was the idea to get a system in witiiouC l_evyin� more taxes on taxpayers. rfrs. Thomas said there �aill probably be areas that wi1l r�eed some streeC li�htin�. Mr. Boardman said they would remu3.n with the street lights, but it may be necessary to install more street lights in some areas such as Osborne. A discussion was held on on-grade crossings, bridges, and overpasseso Mr, Board:nan said one of the major costs of the sys�em is brfidge construction, intersection . remodiiications, railroad protection, etc. H�}sbert Lindblad asked if there were any provi§ions being made on the underpass on Mississippi wh•�le they are building. l�ir. Boardma.n s�.id two sidecti�alks ort each side of the street is being provided, �and then there will be striping on Mississippi. r1r. Boardma.n said he had received a reply from Burlin��on Northern (crossin�s - 61st and 63rd) presently bein� used for crossings anyway, and the Railroad says this is not permissable, .and if the City would like to pursue it further it must go through the�Public Safety Commission. Mr. Boardman suogested in some areas setting up altexnate routes or determine whether they want ta go with an underpasso Mr. Eoardman said they could install an overpass bridge which would be ��ui.te expensive or pushing a pipe underneath the rai.Iroad tracks. He said it would be a good ^ recommendation to suggest a tunnel beneath the trackso The committee further discussed off-street parking, particularly in the Com.mons Park area, and Mr. Boardman felt the Parks Commission is going to have to make a xecomm2ndation on it. The cor,Lmission discussed banning a�d Mr. Boardman said at Che last m�eting they had decided upon total banning on Mississippi, Old Central, and Osborne. Mr. Moen suggested havin� a-seasanal ban or hourly ban •' where necessary. Cuxba.ng was brought ug and Shirleq Caldwall suggested pre-fab curbing. Mr. Moen said this particular type of curt�ing is discouraged in most areas, because of the high possibility of damages to curbing especially by sno�«plowso Jerry Boardman said After tonight's meeting, two or three more meeting5 taill be Eield, they �aill decide definitely what will be in the proposed plan,'and ' then the Bikeway system will hold public hearings. Articles will be published in the paper along with maps slia;aing the citizens wtiere the route system will go� witfi an explanation of whaC the system c�ill entailo Mrs. Calciwell said she was very much in favor oi the bike�oay system, but felt it should be kept §eparate fram the sidewalic sysCem. Mr. Boardman said ttie Committee had set up a vcry minor sidewaTtc sysCem with only the necessary s�.�ecaallcs proposed. }le said Oshorne, Last River I'.oad, and 7tti Streets were mandutory for sidewalks� but each system would be kepC separate in the plan. � Ab TOtT�N�trNT Vern Mocn aelcared the meeCing udjourned ut 10:2.0 p.m. The next meetins is Wodnesduy, Januury 22. � � � Respectiully, � �/: .:,�1.�'-� � . � ; ; f •,. � �1.%+� /�L MINIR 5 OF THE REGULAR PARKS AND RECREATION COPMIISSION MEETING JANUARY ZO, Ig%5 �eetinq was called to order at 7:40 p.m. »y c.t�a;,�„ B1air. �..4 n ME1��ER5 PRESF�IT: Blair, Caldwell, Harris, Wagar N�'r�ERS EXCUSID: Peterson O►��2S PRESIIV'I'; Ed Dupay, 5618 Sth Street N.E. , Fridley, 560-1302, F.Y.F.A. Don Nelson, 5797 Washi.ngton St. N.E., Fridley, 566-2329, F.Y.F.A. •Chuck Kasick, 7361 Concerto Cuzve, Fridley, 786-2345 . ' . ■:► Mr. Blais said that the biggest change in the rules would be in the period times. He said that currently the Pony and PeeWee's play 10 minutes, and the Cubs play l2 minutes. The change would have the Pony ar�l PeeWee's playirig 8 minutes ar�d the Cubs playi.ng 10 minutes . This charige will confonn to high school rules . He stated also that they were adding paragraph 54., whieh states when the point difference in any of the three divisions exceeds 25 points, the r�nainder of the ' game will be played using running time. He mentioned that the time-outs at the end of each half will be changed also. He said that there will not be charge time-out, just a notification to the bench arxl r,lay will continue. Rule 7.3 also has a change, in that now the timeout will be charged to the teaQn rather than the afficials. This will ensure that the coaches can go out and make certain that the h�y is alright when injur�l. Mr. Brown suggested that they take the 7.3 Yul.e and revamp it thgnselves, and then cc�ne back to the Ccn�►ission when it is settled. Mr. Blair asked Mr. Dupay and his Board to review these itens and get back to the Ccamiission. Mr.'Dupay mentioned that he had a fe�a rule changes himself which he would like to implenent. Mr. Blair ccmmented that the only other item was that they wanted the weigh-ins /"� to be conducted by a representative of the teams rather than"g�nne officials. He said that way they can get the kids weighed in and out on the field quicker. Mr. Nelson said that he wr�uld like to see the weigh rule changed so that nlore kids who are overweight, cauld play. Mr. Dupay said tha.t might be scanethi.ng they could look into. Mr. Blais ccarmented. that he wc�uld like to sQe the equi.gnent weighed so that the boys wouldn't have to strip dawn. _ Mr. Blais said that he wished to discuss the paragraph on participation which states that each Jaoy shall play an equivalent to one series of dawns each half. He said that he weuld like to see it increased, as he di.dn't feel that was enough. He asked Mr. Dupa.y to look into it. Mr. Blair mentioned that they should call the Park Office bet-�aeen 4:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. on weekdays, and on weekends they sYiould call the H.A.F. President frcan 12:00 to 1:00 p,m. in case of poor weather. SCORFBOARD Mr. Dupay said that he was concerned regarding the new scoreboard. He wanted to knaw if Mr. Brawn was going to have san+cone running it. Mr. Brown'replied that the City will be providing saneone, hut that if the F.Y.F.A. wants a P. A. System, ti�ey will have ta provide it. He said the City would be paying saneone per game and he will have contro� of the lights, opening the gates, opening the building, a�d running the electric scoreboard. This will be his job. He explained that they can't have 10 or l5 fans, etc. up in that scoreboard, as the building is not �1 that large, plus saneone could get hurt goi.ng up and dvwn, fooling around. He said that they will post a sign stating that it is a dangerous ladder, for the kids to keep off. 15 Minutes of the Parks & Recreation Crnmission Meetirx� Januazy 20 � I975 �age 2 �: Mr. Dupay asked Mr. Brc�wn about sodding the football field at Ccmnons. Mr. Brvwn explained that they'are going to reseed it first, and if that isn't success- ful, which it should be, then they will resod it. Mr. Nelson mentioned that they had talked about contributing to the cost of the sod and installing it. Mr. �rawn explained that if the reseeding is done propexly, it is guaranteed. He said that if it doesn't wc�rk out in 1975, they would welcane the help and contribution in 1976. �1�G FOQTBAt1_ Mrs. Caldwell brought up the point that the coaches have problesn.s with the audience and players. She said that if there were sane sort of "clinic" for the parents to participate in, they could better understand the ruZes, arrcl there wr�uld be less probl�ns. She said that she already knaws several mothers who will personally call each hane arad try to get those garents out. She said that if the c�aches would explain the rules and etiquette of being fans it would make a hig difference. Mr. Dupay feZt that was a good idea. ar�l suggested that Mrs. Calc��,rell vontact Helen Bryne, the Director of Girls Flag Football. Mr. Nelson �ntioned that last year many of the coaches ha.d a"parents night° the first few weeks of the season and explained to th�n the rules, what excuses were acceptable for not �attending practics, etc. Mr. Kasick said that there are new proposed rules. When they are finalized, they will be given to the children to take hane. Mr. • B�rc�nm mentioned that it was up to the Board to revie�a the rules. Mr. Blai.r said that he w�uld be glad to attend the Board meeting to discuss the rule changes when they are ready. ^ Mr. Dupay said that the association which they have formed is the Sp�rts Association, which includes football, girls flag football, w�nen's auxiliary, basketball, ar�1 Ba.be Ruth ba.seball. He said that Helen Bryne is h�-�ndling the girls flag football. He said that she should have a Board of Directors. Mr. Blair asked if the Spo�ts Association overlooks the rules arid policies of their divisions. Mr. Dupay replied that they di.d. Mr. Brawn discussed the fact that in the original agreements the rules and requlations have to be approved by this Camiission. He sai.d that they were going to have to contact Mr. Niel.sen and go aver the old agre�nents and restructure all the sports. He said that the City puts out a grea.t deal of n�ney and they have an obligation. He also mentioned that the Department has to take it's hat off to all the fellows in the Football Association, for the job it does eqery year. He said he wc>uld hate to think of what the City wc�uld have to pay if it was all cm a dollar pPx hour value. He thanked than for all the w�ork they have done on b�half of the citizens of Fridley. Mr. Blaix said that he also.vuished to thank th�n for all their efforts. He thanked then for ccaning and asked them'to cane back when they get their reorganization done. MOTION 6y Hcvcn.i�s, becanded by GJagat�., �a a�pnove �he M.inu�e� a� �he Pcvcfi and Rech.ecc,t,i.an Comm.ia4.�an Mee,t,i.ng, da.ted �eeembeh. 23, 1�914. The ma�',i.on ecvvc,i.ed. H[KF�YS CCY�M'IITl�E N�ING � Mrs. Caldwell asked if it would be possi.ble for us to have parking in the school parking lot. She said that there will be a problan with the bike�aay paths in that there will be no parking on the street. Mr. Dupay said that we need a sign stating there is additional parking i.n the school parking lot. Mr. Brawn said that the scY�o1 wil.l allaw parking there. Mrs. Caldwell mentioned that the / Minutes of the Parks & Recreation Cce�mission Meeting January 20, 1975 Page 3�°� Bikeways Ccmmittee requested that she encourage the City and the school to do what- ever is necessary in order ta get the people to park in the school parking area, be- /, cause the parking restrictions will present parking will present parking problens. Mr. Blair said that the bikeway systan is designed as a transportation systan, rather than a recreation syst�n. ►�u�u�: : ' Mr. Brawn stated that the phone survey on snouanobile and letter on sriowtnobiles in Locke is for the Cannission's information. He said that there are only twc� cities out of the entire poll that provide snowmr�bile areas on land. Z'hey are Fridley and Edina. Mr. Harris asked Mr. Brown what he proposed to do with Locke Park in regard to snotimiobiling. rir. Brown replied that tY� City Council approved alternative #2, which states that snc�wmobiling is allawable and should be posted. He said that the new state law is that if you allaw it, you must put signs stating it is allawed. The Carer�ission discussed the fact that they feel snowmobiling will rv�t be allowed in Fridley in a few years, due to abuse of private property, etc. ��.� .__ , ' �I Mr. Brawn reported to the Cc�m.ission that he had received a lettes fran a minister o£ one ot the churches in Fridley, canplaining about hockey games being scheduled on Sundays. He said that he had given a capy ta Bob 0]mstead, President of the Hockey Association. Mr. Blair mentioned that he had talked to Mr. O]mstead � about the letter and Mr. Olmstead said that the conflict was not with the City group, but with District #14, because they are scheduling the games on Saturday an�d Sunday, and this the Hockey Association has no oontrol over. Mr. Brvwn said � that the Hockey Association should contact District #l0 and advise then that they ' have sane concerned people. He stated that he realized that this is the.only time they can get indoor ice, so that is why they schedule the games then, hawever, people should have the right to go to church if they so desire. Mrs. Caldwell suggested that the Fridley Hockey Association state they will not pl.ay games scheduled on Sunday, but Mr. Harris pointed aut that sane kids would show up and sane not, resulting in Fridley's games being forfeited. . GOALIE SHOUL�ER PADS Mr. Brawn said that Gary St�mnler had called him in regard to the goa.lie shoulder pads. Mr. Stimmler felt that the City sl�uld provide than. Mr. Brown said that we already provide ches protectors. Mr. Brown explained to Mr. Stimmler that the kids probably won't wear then, they'11 thraw th�n in a corner, etc. Mr. Harris pointed out that you w�uld have to have different sizes, and you run into a problen there. Mr. Brown said that he felt that shoulder pads are really a personal piece of equipnent. He said that maybe they should talk to the H.A.F. about providing than. Mr. Harris canmented that if you start to pravide s�ulder pads for the goalies, whexe do you draw the line. Mr. Brawn pointed out that many of the kids btiy their awn hockey sticks, and don't even use the ones pravided by the City. • MOTION by Glagan, �econded by Ca.Pdwe,e.e xa accep� �he �no�aded mee�.n.g dcr,te�s �an �he Parch� and Rec�c.e.ati.an Comm.i��s�.on Mee.ti,nga Son 1975. The ma�'.i.on cafvued. ►�u ► � '�:► ':�' : �� ^ Mr. Brawn explained that we need to nam� the park property by Farr Lake, Harris Lake, Blencoe, and East River Road. Mrs. Caldwell suggested that the el�nentary children in thE various scYiools near each park, have a contest and be allawed to � `� Minutes o£ the Parks & Recreation Ccmmission Meeting January 20, 1975 Page 4 su?�nit names. Mr. Blaix stated that'that had been done the last three times and �^ could be done again. Mr. Brawn said that the children at Rice Creek School could n�ne the Harris Lake park, the children at North Park and Gardena Schools could sx�ne Farr Lake, the children.at Rive�rood could name Glencoe and the children at Stevenson School could name East River Road Park. Judy Wyatt, Parks Secretary was designated as chairman of the civic graups delegated to judging the naming of North Park. She was instructed to contact four other leaders fran civic groups to fornn a cce�mittee to judge the entries for North Park. AI�OURNMENT MOTION �o ad1awc.n. �h.e mee,ti.ng c�i 9:25 p.m. The next regular meeting will be held on Monday; February 24, 1975 at 7:30 p.m., in the Catmunity Roan of Fridley Civic Center. Respectfully stil�nitted, �� y Wy ,"Secre to the CaYmission f1 !''� 18 BUZLDING STANDARDS-DESi�I� CQNTROL SUBCOM"9ITTEE P�EETINr OF JANUARY 23, 1975 ^ Chairman Lindblad called the meeting to order at 8:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Lindblad, Seeger, Tonca MEMBERS ABSENT: Simoneau, Nelson . OTHERS PRESENT: Howard Mattson, Engineering Aide � MOTION by Tonco, seconded by Seeger to approve the minutes of the January 9, 1975 meeting. . 1. CONSIDERATION QF A REQUEST TO COf�STRUCT A�iEW 6_UILDING T� BE USED , � AS A WAREHOUSE: LOCATEa 0�( LOTS 16 Af�D 17, BLOCK 8, ONAWAY: THE SAME BEIfVG 779) ELM STREET, FRIDLEY MI�INESOTA. REQUEST BY PACO MASONRY CQNTRACTORS INC, 5920 NORTH KIRKWOOD LAfVE, MIi�PlEAPOLIS, MTNNESOTA 55442 Mr. Steven Spraungel represented Paco Masonry in their request.. - t�ir. Spraungel presented a new set of plans for� the warehouse. Mr. Lindblad led in a discussion on the use of parking on the side of the building, which is now being used according ta code in the new plan. Mr. Tonca asked about the use of a bumper ratl against the building in front of the parking area. �"1 Mr. Spraungel stated he would have to use a 6umper rail because of the shortage of space needed for parking stalls, and that the sidewalk in front of the parking stalls would be eliminated. Mr. Tonco stated the bumoer rail should conform to the size used in past warehouse buildings constructed by Paco Masonry. Mr. Lindblad stated the prec�st curbing could be use� but only on a temporary basis on the south side of the par[cing 1ot. P�07ION by Tonco, seconded by Seeger, to recomme�d approval of the plan - with the following stipulations: � . � 1. Fresent in writing names of shrubs and trees used in the landscaping ; to the City Council. i ;, 2. Precast curbing may be used at the South boundary of the,property, � .4 but if in a year additionai property is not acquired to the South, � then poured concrete should be installed. Performanee bond set at $1�a00. I 3. Security lights should be installed around the building and in the � parking 1ot. 4. Refuse will be kept inside of the building unless space is not � available, a screened in area will then be provided outside. , _-- � � �.�� BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIG�1 CONTROL SUBCOP�IMITTEE MEETING OF JANUARY 23, 1975 Pq.-2 5. Bumper rails used between the building and parking lot should be 8" X 8" vrooden posts attached directly to the building with metal guard strips attached to the posts. 2. I SiDERATiOI� OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A NEW BUILDINr TO BE USED A MANUFACTURTNG FACILITY. LOCATED AT 20Q MISSISSIPPI STREET i�.E., QUFST BY RAO MANUFACTU.RING COMPAI�Y, 20i0 NORTN 4th STREET, Mr. Richard Olsen, f1r. Robert O1sen,.Senior, and Mr. �?obert O1sen, �unior were present far the request. Mr. Richard Qlsen presented the building plans and an artists rendering of the building as i� wi11 look tivhen it is completed. Mr. Tanco ctiscussed the use of preEast curbing and that the commi�tee would not accept its use if expansion of the building would cantinu� over a three-year period. � ��Ir. Olsen stated the building expansion would continue over a ten-year period, Mr. Lindblad stated that poured concrete should be used. Mr. -0isen said he would agree ta the poured eancrete curbing. Pir. Olsen stated the outsid� of the building is metal, 20 feet high, and that the affice part of the building ►�vill have a hea��y rock work, and colored panels contrasting with the color of the rest of the buiiding. ��r. Tonco asked if the colored panels were part of the structure of the building. Mr. Olsen stated the coiored panels were not part af the structure of the building but for decoration purposes only. Mr. P�attson questioned the consistency of the r�ock wall with the rest of the building and asked if the 1ow pitched roof must be maintained. , The committee agreed �o the use af the pitched roof and suggested tha�. i some further treatment of the wall be�investigated. f-1r. Lindblad discussed the view of the building from the Narth and South , sides. �1 P�r. Tonco suggested that a pilaster-like projection every 40 or 50 feet with some periodic lighting an the South wall would help to break up the lon� expanse of wall on that side. Mr. Lindblad s�ated that he thaugFit one or two contrasting panels on both the South and North sides might be a11 that would be necessary to break up the long wall expanse and create more interest. Mr. Tonca asked about outside storage of refuse. . 20 BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING OF JANUARY 23, 1975 Pq -3 ^ Mr. �lsen stated all unused materials would be stored in the building. MOTIQN by Seeger seconded by Tonco, to recommend approval of the plan with the foNowing stipulations. : 1. Recommend approval subject to the Board of Appeals 70 foot variance. 2. Recommend approval subject to the Planning Commission zoning the property M-1. 3. Refuse to be placed inside the 6uilding or provide a screened in � area outside. � 4. Security lights all around the building and �n the park-ing lot. 5. Sodding used where specified on plans. 6. Designated landscaping design with the names of shrubs and trees being used be put in writing before go�ng to Council. 7. Poured cancrete curbing and black top driveway. 8. PJew design plan for the building on a portion of the North wall and the entire South wall, � ^ UPON A VOICE VOTE, all vating aye, the motion carried unanimously. Chairman Lindblad adjourned the meeting at 10:2Q P.�-1. Respectfully submitted, 'i ��dre.�.�� - Arlene L. Smith Secretary i . . 1 1 , , ,. ; I � ; � : i : , THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING OF JANUARY 28� 1975 �1 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Drigans at 7:30 P.M. � MEMBERS PRESENT: Drigans, Crowder, Gabe1, Plemel, Wahlberg MEMBER5 ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: Howard Mattson, Engineering Aide MOTION by Plemel, seconded by Gabel, to approve the minutes of the January 14, 1975 meeting as written. Upon a voice vote, there beinq no nays, the motion carried. 1. A RE UEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 205.134 6, FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDUCE THE SETBACK BETWEEN THE MAIN STRUCTURE AND A STREET LINE, WHEN ADJACENT TO ANOTHER ZONING DISTRICT, (ALONG THE FRONT LOT LINE) FROM THE REQUIRED 100 FEET TO 70 FEET, TO ALL06� THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MANUFACTURING BUILDING AND WAREHOUSE TO BE LOCATED ON LOTS 1 THROUGH 15, AiJD LOT5 2£3 THROUGH 32, AND PART OF LOTS 16 AND 27, ALL IN BLOCK 8, LOTS 3 THROUGH 15, AND PART OF LOTS 2, 16 AND 27 THROUGH 32, ALL IN BLOCK 9, AND THAT PART OF BLOCh 7, LYING ADJACENT TO SAID BLOCK 8, AND THE VACATED ALLEYS IN �LOCKS €3 AND 9, AND VACATED MAIN STREET AND VACATED ELM STREET, ALL BEING IN LOWELL ADDITION TO FRIDLEY PARK, THE SAME BEING 200 MISSISSIPPI STREET N.E., FRIDLEY, MINN. (RE UEST BY RAO MANUFACTURING COMPANY, 2010 NOR'1ri 4TH 5TREET, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA.) Mr. Dick Olson, representing RA0 Manufacturing, was present to present the request. MOTION by Crowder, seconded by Wahlberg, to waive reading the public hearing notice. Upon a voice vot�, there being no nays, the motion carried. Chairman Drigans stated that this same property is before the Planning Commission for rezoning and also was before Buildinq Standards-Desiqn Contro].. He said � currentiv the Planninc7 Commission has tabled the rezonina for a leaal opinion from' the Citv Attornev as to this tvpe of business operation (metal tabricatian) bexna allowed in an M-1 Zonina. He said the Zoninct Code could be interpreted to exclude it from M-1 Zoninrt and the Planninq Commission wants a lectal opinion on the intent of this part o£ the Code. Chairman Dricrans added the petitioner has verified that certa.in naise levels are within the standards. He said that the Board of Appeal's action, if it is approval, should be contingent upon the approval of the rezoning. � Mr. Dick Olson showed the plot plan of the property to the Board. He stated on this property, the setbacks are basically determined by the adjacent zoning districts. He said the front yard setback would usually be 35 feet but because of the different zoning, they are required to set back l00 feet. He said the back yard setback would usually be 25 feet but because of the different zoning and an easement it has to be 50 feet. Mr. Olson said they have set out the building as a whole, with maximum land use. He said they have placed the building as far to the west as possible because of the railraad tracks, and also as far back into the lot as possible. He said they have tried to design the building to be as wide as.the lot would allow and still not be all stretched out. He said the building would be an all steel building and to go to the next smaller width size, would require changing the parking area from the side to the front. Mr. Olson said they would prefer to stay with the 50 foot rear yard setback and ask for the variance on the front yard because the residential property to the back might be developed someday. Mr. Olson stated that because of the proposed improvement of Mississippi Street, � there should be no problem if the variance was granted. He said since the street n wi11 be dipping at this location, their building will be fronting a retaining wall " and not Mississippi Street. He said this retaining wall comes in by Main Street and the street is depressed from there on. He added that there will be a frontage road before Mississippi Street and the houses to the north of Mississippi 5treet so there should be no objections from these people as RAO will not really be '�,,�_ The Minutes of the Board of Appeals Subcommittee Meeting of January 28, 1975 Page 2 � — �� encroaching on their property. Mr. Plemel stated the plot plan shows the proposed building plus a possible future expansion. iie asked if the expansion would also be metal. Mro Olson answered �� that they have to plan on complete usage of the land and the eomplete building will be all metal construetion. Mr. Olson showed the Board a colored rendering of the building. Mr. Olson explained their building will consist of a concrete slab, a structural steel frame for the walls and ceiling, and sculptured steel panels that have a textured look bolted onto the frame. He added the panels are painted at the factory and are quaranteed for 20 years. He said they are quite efficient. Mrs. Wahlberg asked what the efficiency rating was. Mr. Olson said heat and noise wise, the efficiency ratinq was equal to a 3 foot concrete block wall. Mr. Olson added that because of the residential property to the north and south of th'is building, they will have their production space in the middle of the building, surrounded by conerete walls, plus the outside steel walls, so there should be no problems with noise. He added that this type of building is more expensive than a concrete building, but because af the heat savings and expansion savings, the buildings pay for themselves. He said for expanding, a wall can be unbolted from the frame, the additional length erected, and t}.� same wall can then be reused. He sai.d the buildings come complete from the factory. Mr. Crowder asked what the area of the land is and what pereentage will be used for the building. Mr. Olson said their total building will be built in three stages. The building they are praposing now will have 48,OOQ square feet with the two future stages having a total of approximately 52,000 square feet. He said they will be slightly under the 40 percent maximum coverage with the total buil.ding. Mr. Crowder asked if there will be a problem with the parising for the total building. � Mr. Mattson said there will be no problems with the first stage of cons�ruction. Mr. Olson added that the use for the second aX►d trird stages of construction is not definite as yet and the use would determine the parking spaces:�needed. He said he believed that the Building Standards committee would have to approve the future construction plus the additional parking necessary. Mr. Crowder asked if the exit from this building would be onto Nli ssissippi Street. Mr. Olson answered that Mississippi will be the only,access to the property. Chairman Drigans asked how many people would be employeed at this building. Mr. Olson said initially they are planning on 50 employees; 34 during the day shift and 16 at night. He said eventually, when the total building is constructed, they may have 165 employees with 80 to 85 on each shift. He added that he was on].y guessing at these figures. Mr. Crowder asked if all the loading, unloading, and parking would be on the east side of the building. Mr. Olson answered that it would be. Mrs. Wahlberg asked when they planned on starting construction. Mr. Olson said he hoped in the spring, but it would depend on financing. He added it would then take approximately 6 months to complete and they hoped to be in the building by fall. Mr. Olson said they are now in the process of closing the deal on the land and when it is complete, the existing farm buildings will be torn down. - � Mr. Bob Brazil, 731-68th Avenue N.E., said he has worked for this company for many years and there couldn't be nicer people to work for. He said this company employs several families from Fridley and that is why they decided to locate in Fridley. T he Minu tes o f t h e B o a r d o f A e a l s S u b c o mm i t t e e Meetin of Januar 28 1975�� Pa e 3 MOTION by Gabel, seconded by Growder, to close the public hearing. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried. ^ Mrs. Wahlberg asked if th�re would be any problem with the drainage going down the road. Mr. Mattson said this was specifically asked for by the City. Mr. Mattson also noted that the loading on the east would con5titute side yard loading but they have shown adequate berming to take care of this. Mr. Crowder stated he is very glad something is going to,be done with this property. He added this building looks very nice and he can't see where the variance would create any problems. He said there would be no extra traffic generated on the street past the residential property, and since Mississippi Street is to be i.mproved, the traffic qoing into this business should not create any problems. Mrs. Wahlberg noted also that there were no objections from the surrounding property owners. MQTION by Gabel, seconded by Wahlberg, to recommend to Council, approval of the front yard variance, contingent upon the'legal opinion in reference to and ap��roval of the rezoning before the Planning Commission. Upon a voice vote, there being n�o nays, the motion carried. 2. A RE UEST FOR VARIANCES OF: SECTION 205.134, 4C, FRIDLEY CITY GODE, TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM THE RE UIRED 25 FEET TO 7.5 FEET, AND, SECTION 205.135, 1F, 4A, TO REDUCE THE DISTANCE THE DRIVEWAY IS FROM A LOT LINE FROM 5 FEET TO ZERO FEET, AND, SECTION 205.135, l, E4, TO REDUCE THE DISTANCE OFF-STREET PARKING IS AWAY FROM THE MAIP1 BUILDING FROM 5 FEET TO ZERO FEET, AND, SECTION 205.134, 4, B2, TO REDUCE � THE SIDE YARD SETBACK ABUTTILdG A SIDE STREET FROM THE �UIRED 35 FEET TO 33 FEET, j�T,T. TO ALIAW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING TO BE LOCATED ON LOTS 16, 17 AND 18, BLOCK 8, ONAWAY ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 7791 ELM STitEET N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (RE UEST-BY PACO, INCORPORATED, 5920 KIRKWOOD LANE, MINNEAPOLIS, MINN.) Mr. Steven Sprangler, representing Paco, Incorporated, was present to present the request. MOTION by Wahlberg, seconded by Crowder, to waive reading the public hearing notice. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried, Chairman Drigans stated this property had been before the Board on November 12, 1974, and also before Building 5tandards on November 21, 1974. Chairman Drigans read the minutes of these meetings and also the City Council minutes concerning the above two meetings. N1rs. Wahlberg asked if this new plan has been before Building Standards. Mr. Mattson answered that it was before Building Standards on January 23, 1975. He added the plot plan has the markings on it from that meeting. Chairman Drigans stated this proposal is for the use of three lots, whereas the last proposal was for two, and the building has been turned around so that instead of a zero side yard setback for the building, they are now asking for a zero side yard setback for a driveway. The variance locations were pointed out on the plot plan. � The variance for the Sriveway to have a zero setback was discussed. Mro Crowder asked if there was a house to the south,on Lot l9. Mx'• �ttson said that there was but that the land the house was on was zoned industrial. Chairman Drigans said if this variance was denied, the driveway would have to be reduced to 15 feet and the parking stalls slanted more, The Minutes of the Board of Appeals Subcommittee Meeting of January 28, 1975__ Page_4 Mr. Crowder added that the semi drivers will have to back into the parking area and �4 if there is a 5 foot green area, they will probably drive over it, especially in the winter time. Mrs. Walberg asked about the snow removal from the parking area; would it be pushed onto somebody elses property. Mr. Crowder asked what the ratio was of the building to the land area. It was� �igured out to be under 40 percent. Mr. Pl:emel stated that this building is bigger than the first proposal but there is one more lot, so they shouldn't need to ask for a zero variance on the driveway. Chairman Drigans said his concern was that there is no agreement with the adjoining property owner for the zero setback ar the snow removal. � Mr. Mattson stated that Mr. Paschke of Paco, Inc, had indicated that he wanted to ' pick up the lots to the south of this property for another building site and then combine the parking for both buildings. Chairman Drigans stated that Mr. Paschke might be able to buy them but then someone else might buy them too. The Board can't ma.ke it's decision on only a possibility. Mr. Sprangler said that the garage for the dwelling to the south is located toward the adjacent lot line. The side yard'variance from 35 feet to 33 feet was then discussed. . Mr. Crowder said because of this being a corner lot, they get caught with a 35 foot setback on both sides. He asked what the driveway on this side (78th Avenue) of the building was for. Mr. Sprangler said this was for a drive-in door. Mr. Crowder asked if it will be used by semis. Mr. Sprangler said it would be used mostly by �.vans to drive into the building. Chairman Drigans asked if this was a speculative building. Mr. Sprangler said that it is being listed through Thorpe so they might have a buyer for it. Mrs. 6Vahlberg asked if the building was moved 5 feet closer to 78th Avenue, and eliminating the 5 foot variance on the south, would this create any problems with the aesthetics of the area. The Baard then looked at the aerial map of this area and also the Onaway area site plan. Chairman Drigans noted that the setbacks of the buildings from 78th Avenue are not all uniform so to move this buil.di.ng closer to 78th Avenue would not create any special problem. A discussion on the variance for the off-street parking next to the main building brought out that Building Standards had stipulated a bumper rail be mounted on the �building if the Board approved this variance. Chairman Drigans noted that this variance along with the bumper stipulation has been approved for quite a few of the buildings constructed in this area: The varianc� for the rear yard was discussed. Mr. Crowder said he was more concerned with the rear yard variance than the others. He said the Harris building, adjacent to the rear yard, had some problems with the utility poles in the easement. The Board was shown the Harris building plot plan. Chairman Drigans stated that according to the plot plan, the Harris building has an 8 foot rear yard which would leave 15� feet between the two buildings if this variance was approved. He added that the buildings would be relatively close. nMr. Crowder said .he would be willing to grant the same rear yard variance on this property as was granted on the Harris property. � . . . . _ . • . "�"�' The Minutes of the Board of A�eals Subcammittee Meeting of January 28, 1975 Page 5 Mr. Crowder said he would like to get Mr. Paschke's reaction to moving the building 5 feet farther north. He said this would mean denying the side yard setback for the;�5 driveway from 5 feet to zero feet and increasing the side yard setback from 78th �,,,1 Avenue from 35 feet to 28 feet. Mr.�Sprangler said he was sure Mr. Paschke'would agree to this. Chairman Drigans said this would also allow for snow removal. Mr. Plemel said he favors neither variance and feels the building s�ould be shortenea. Mr. Mattson said the normal driveway length is 25 feet, and in this case, if the building was moved, the driveway would still be 28 feet. Chairman Drigans added there is also a 15 foot boulevard before the street so it would not create any visibility problems. � MOTION by Wahlberg, seconded by Gabel, to close the public hearing. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried. Chairman Drigans said he favored moving this building farther north as the adjacent properties are not in line,and with the boulevard it would still be 43 feet from the street. He sa;_� by moving it ahead, it would also allow more flexibility in the back for the semis and snow removal. He also favored moving it as Paco does not own the adjacent land and because they da not have an agreement for the snow removal or the zero side yard with the property owner. Mr. Crowder said he also felt the driveway variance should be denied and the side yard variance approved, with the understanding that if the applicant won't cut the building down by 5 feet, that the Board would consider granting the side yard variance from 35 feet to 28 feet. /', MOTION by Plemel, seconded by Crowder, to recommend to the City Council, approval of the rear yard variance from 25 feet to 7.5 feet, and, cZeniaZ of the variance to reduce the distance the driveway is from the lot line from 5 feet to zero feet, and, approval of the variance to reduce the distance off street parking is away from the main building from 5 feet to zero feet with the stipulation of a bumper rail to be installed on the building, and, appraval of the variance to reduce the side yard abutting a side street from 35 feet to 33 feet, with a maximuri variance down to 28 feet if the building is moved 5 feet farther north. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMEi3T : The meeting was adjourned by Chairman Drigans at 9:30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, � l MARY HIN21 — Secretary � �� t� !�'� OFFICIAL NOTICE CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: - Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Commission of the City af Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on January 22, 1975 in the Council Chamber at 8:00 P,M. for the purpose of: Consideration of a rezoning request, ZOA #74-05, by RAO Manufacturing Company, to rezone from C-2S igeneral. shopping areasi • to M-1 (light industrial areas), Lots 3 through 15, parts of lots 2, l�, 27 tlirough 32, all in Block 9; vacated alleys in Block 9; and the east half of vacated Main Street lying adjacent to said Block 9, a11 being in Lowell Addition to Fridley Park,•lying - westerly af the West line of the plat af Sj�lvan Hi11s Plat 6 and lying northerly of the North line of the plat of Sylvan Hills Plat 8, all lying in the South Half of Section 14, City of Fridley, County of Anoka,, Minnesota. Generally located between Main Street and Second Street N.E., South of Mississippi Street N.E. Anyane desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter may be heard at this time. Publish: January 8, 1975 January.l5, 1975 EDWARD J. FITZPATRICK CHAIRMAN - PLANNING COMMISSION � ^ I � I _ � � � � i � i I , ^�"• , I ` i RAO MANUF'ACTURIPdG CGMPANY yegal Description of property to be rezoned . �8 . Lots 3�through 15, part of lots 2, 16� 2? through 32� all in Elock 9; vacated alleys in Block 9; and the east half of vacated Main Street lying adjacent to said Block 9, all being in Lawell Addition to F�idley Park, Anoka County, Minnesota lying westerly of the West line of the plat of : Sylvan Hi11syPl.at 6 and lying �� ,�u� /� northerly of the ?lorth line of the plat of S lvan Hills Plat 8. LAND SIZE: 271.6� ft. East�r:est� 359.94 fto North-South . i?�???.?0 Sq. Ft, 2,2l� Acres . List of roperty owners within 350 ft, of property to be rezoned. �� P and 200 ft. of property for variance. Planning Commission January 7, 1975 Anoka County Council MAILING L•IST ZOA #74-05 � rditto- RAO Manufacturing Co. Lgnn D. & Christine L. Hansen 6530 2na. st. N.E. � Frid2ey �in City Federal 801 Marquette Ave. Mpis., r�. 55420 Walter H. Sinner � L�l�27 Monros N.E. Mpls.� �. 55�21 Richard J. Trezona 177 Hartman C�.rcle Fridley, Ntn. 55lt32 Caroll C. Groth 201 Mississippi St. Fridley� Mn. �5Lt21` II' Project No 61 Corp. � 11Q Times Bidg. ' l�ipls., Mn. 55�to1 ; � ; Raymond J. Brink ' 6536 Main St. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55�t32 - -ditto- ' -df:tto- -ditto- Nick J. Dovolis 3815 Wash�urn Ave. S. Mp1s.� Mn. 55Lt10 Leonard E. & Jai�ie Swanson � 6501 Main St. � Fridiey� N�.n. 55�32 � Garq R. & Jill B. Marlow _ 6525 Ma,in st. F�idley, .�In. 55�t32 Carlson- Lavine Inc. 2831 Aldrich Ave. S. Mpls., rsn.. 55408 � •.ditto- ' -ditto- ; - ditto- j -ditto- i -ditto- Ralph W. & Jar�yce L. Messer � lllt Satellite Lane �3.a�ey, A�n. 55�32 Alf R. & Dorothy M. Lee 130 Satellite Lano Frid2ey� Mn�. 55432 Robert F. & Patricia M. Strom ].l,t1t Satellite Lane Fridl.ey� Mn. 5��t32 Nick Dennis Jr. 11t0 29th Ave. N.�;. Mpls., rtn. 55ls18 Donald E. & Mary J. �{iefe 201 Satel.lite Lane . Fridley, Mn, 55tt32 Rice Pla2a 110 Times �ldg. Mpls., Mn. 55�t01 -ciitto- Edstrom Realtp 61� East 2nd St. Winona, Mn. 55987 -ditto- RAO Manufacturing Co. 2010 North 4th Street Minneapolis, Mn 55405 ... .. ,..... . . . ry •^ , .. .^. i w . ; i� //!��l' •e � . ` '� ! z �� I • � � •�f�._ __. �t�� a lI ` 6 � ' �' a t itQa �. ' wi4r.•" , : Ti� f?f M �/`� ��.��`t`� y. �—._. N!Y n '1 . ; " Jtr•.�v .�•r � /!f�l' i)f.lt_'Si � .,� �� 70 * ' 1 p •u ,�' � 91 , � `. � � � I . . W ..T'71'�r�s��v��/[•./oA « ' � A �, v SQ. `�v' n'�'� �. � . V r. S� . I�• f. Y,� ✓� � ��.� R `. ' � C � f . } � . l O n� � � � 7 u' •' w. �e � � ��M1if.�:��'•s �,, `! .•�-�. �(� `(. ; � � � . � d � .� � �. k�,w Y ... ` ': L� nr a w .:a_ / l,• �0_... o , R k . t 'o:r� ,� [, i`i,iitra h .>� l;.,'"�• '\.. • 1 7 � ` t , . � :, _ �. � 1� � � �,., , : �. 5 i. ' . � : 1 �,r �~ " C� ' 4:,� . .r , ..., �a t ` ,..` i � , u� � � . �..-.t�i�`'f�.,�. A b 6c .� 2 � ,�;� •�• b .�a.a. �� . � (�j • o t �§ � . k . b ' . �•j 3' �f� 't ..l�_ � ��•..\; /� 1,':9 ;�� ; 7 ��T et �f � . I�� t �1��1 � �i�a�- �. 1 I� �' . F • `{ 7 t.�! � 1� � � � � � • i;1 0 �� C'3 ',c��.; � ��, � � . ��i. t t � � � �'�' � {:. � � NI JO }L �f S%I� .1 �p : �.- - . sn�us Gt%� y 3�� X •.p��' w � . W rs�..i �%-�, . , ! ± . . ' . . . . � ? i .. �Ua•.. - •• . . � � � �� . � n 1 . � � . � � - .�J • . Li.. � � � . ' _ . �s {� . � . �. . . b.. �� . . r ' . � � J , a'•��• . 2 . � OA #74-05 RRO MFG. C0. A � � � ' ' Jj � - - f"r'r- � 'b vrrco-e , n, " � f ts•seM . ., r. .. ' . • . �� . . i 1�.r70) .; � � Ve w� . . � - t i � , . r. i � ' �c os'rs' w � �2 %'�O� � '' �� . � , � � r� �- � �% . ' `� � .. �(j � . �' � . � � .. � , �.. ' �___' _ � � ,, . . � � . v . - ..� ..k . ��+ � '� .p....rR��.>, i � �� :sn w � . . . . � ' ��, rr� ; a ��zs1 � �,� t , - �0"01 � -�. ; < < _� � , i � I . � ' > ° ; ':�, �Y � �. _ � ; � J`� ~� � ♦ � � � r �( � � �. N ` � }� ^23 lA.� �� l� � : f;. ,.�• � � /.. ,. .ro�s <<,� _ � �.•o o.• ' I . . �. � T . . . . . ' � ' � � � ,, s/-yI, - E � ' � .�� . .� p � � � �' ,� . . �3'M`•st d ;,.� l�.J'I ,iJ._ �': 'ii++�� f'. , T,. 5 �1 . . .1 � � . � • � , a . � � .��y �!'._ .0 � � �lt, -� � r ± �,:;�` , : � ��/ � �f . /9 111 f3 l�r ' �° � � r � � . i . 8+A � �K �i6 � � e�N � � i� . . � . 4}�,� , - i �: < . �r /� � � .s. (� . . .. " � / � � 4 � i • i6 .l' 0 ,s'�.� � � • . F .a� •� !.. ••-o '►`1� . . .'w.9M�; ,. � eK,.. � ( iC ��.,- � • b ��. . 4' / � �O K' .� ". �, � . , � : � . .', , � ` ., (!- . • �/..�.� •'.. .. ,.•— �i _�- � � . _ � �•._�. . _ . ..: _._, � � �B1Z.1� WO�C��'_ -. �T _ • r_�. •..__ — 17F1Y' '. - •... -� ,., - � =-- - -`iirc�� ±3 �31 T' 2' i °: ,�. , ... - � ,.. „ � i ;� — ^ ��7 � � . . . � � �.� � S�tl � ' i � � AZ7� . � :.y,�i�! L�.��f,��'i . . i .: .� s � . I � � � �. . . . /Y { . ~ : , ^ ' � , • ryt � ' i � 1 .i� ��. � � � � � � . . . . � } . �j. � i � ( , I � � t I . i`, ,!`'a9s 7.t S43 Zlg'..7.t��.-Y..��i��'C1?j7i"r,s!3,;�� i'"� • �.'j; ; . �, . p17� '�:�� r '` ''.' `•!'� �77� � �� , �.....�,•• 1! L_� q � . .. . � � � . ... � � �� u • .�� •s �.� �� ^�`.` � � � � t=; �_ - �d _ �}� �� ; �r � 7,`'"�ri _ � �: fi%�. i . � � e 1 A /.To �� i- ��v �♦ � t� r �� .. . � . � � . ' � .. . � o-� , � � /1 ��j�, �t �'° ��'�.;,� `, � 3' - � , ��., ,: ` ! �,.�. -- :t`�''{�1 � - —� �~ 1:.----r'4- � � i . .. _ .a �-:J �, rfyj/ '�1 1 _� �} � � '� f f � � � V]�jLj� �a-_ . � ,�,:��: ti it �^ � " i � ' - � . ( 1' � . . /' T i _" ; .-� � . ` . �e�T � M \ � � . . . . � . ; �. � � s ---�,� � _ � �� : - ; �.�i. �� ,4 ,;� �� L� �� - ¢ �� .�..� �'}-- - : , [/��. -. o} M - . � ` ' � . ,i . .� .i.� t ' 1 . . }�// �'� � - - . � `� i.i . . � � . � � � . #N -'-- __ --1_ _ �=�'r' � '�" _� -r, '" �J + � �' i i y /o �� i.'�� 'y , 'ri -7 �� t ( � o, �;� i , �, _�_.. .,...-�raiuf��J��l��1��r�', �� t �°' • �}_ �� ! ' N � --T � 'a � L � ;� � �t �� ' �11� ��f �. � �,_ i: b �. .�`j Zs ; .� L �� _ , � ' � 4 / � .. . . � . . Js.t . �f � .�. \ r� i �� . . . V'. � ' �� /� �, a �z. �!� i�_-'�"�.- Jtr� f,r �� .�—�—. .�� . .. . � � . i. '� ..� .` " � �3' � (!') ,; \�.., � a '-0~ ,x � '' 2 �� ; ; �; -, --._ — — � — � A T . � - -� z � -:� .�ti r .:� ,.,�- r,, � `+� � �. � . � ii - ;� ,f ..m.,t; -. � �� . . 1� ' � ./ ��' d0% '! - ./,^> - .La)�d)±�`r l{�3e� �4=."� 'L'' » �_ . � ti .�.j' . . '.� . .. t � '� � . .✓w.r:� - > . o:.s:.+ t„ ' � �� i!F��t. i �'� ►a. � . � � �. LLi?' _ :��.. • :, .�-..:- � G.� i �.! L 1 � �..: ..-_ . . �• / � �,• �, e � ; �,s f " _ ; ,....., ,r.�, •.:' • 1� � y . ., ' � j•.otN•'� � I . .'�.J,�. f� �`- •..+'t . �. ,\ C c � � . d • � n : + . • � � " vT� ,I. ♦ •e.,�„ I �% + :�. ., .s . �. „ .: - ; `'� J.1 ... c� �,� L r,L ,�t �� N ' �' 1rj , • -- � ..• . �a ��' . �"- ,� < =� .� �; .�. j} . . . + �� 2 ;� � �� : � � . �e41 I ti f w L w� � •, � ,.' � y)��J, s, �,�9 �j� � � •� � • '+. I �+ , �.� � � t� � � .. 4" t � `� 1 � [`� 1 � , � � °' � �l��, ti � �' - -� r,•� � � � . ....., n/•, : �: _ )/ ,7.-� ,e,- o `� ta } .y.• • 1 `. fJ q�' � tI 'J•'; •�J- � . . . 1� ,� • ! / • . .r, � •~~a - � � •./ .�! • _... j T— ` • . . � � .� . '._�`• � � � � .� . �..r: � . _ �` .\ �,�Av�..,+\ 4�� 7�'•, •+1 �d ��] � . 1�+ �';:� - _.. � �� ., ,a , ,� � :; ,: - .- ; ,� ;. ,: , �. a � , , � ; � 1' �' � ; � .4,��,: � � � - •"„/,.. � f�,.."' _� , � d 1: i j � �� 'A ' . ,. -:. , _,. � 0 1._ _--�r ! , -.. d, :. i ; - � � � - i �v �� ; � � �� .• i ' , y� = � B � � ,� . I �,�� ., ut: f '� 1 -- ..� ,, ,�','V1 . SY1_�l:a�a•:;11 � LAyE � �'• y �f� �'''''� .,� — .V '-.�-� �. A s ^ i S• '�' .�� •,• v ;�� - .. « • • , • ' � • �•` i�.: � 1/ . . i,, ' , + ( : , .�„s.,• -• . � � � , � ��: v ' .�.:..w� ,� ' � - �:..'' ', i ' •*� .t : i' ` " •� r I ! �� "f� �' � � :! � , .., �. I �1 ^ ''� : •i'S� . ♦. i ft. �� ♦r� ... t . � � � � . t. + ♦ � 1 rv ti � ! ' � a� ( ! � �":' � � � : ! .A % , � ;. ti ti � .. i. � � � : ' i' - r!' � I'_ . `. : '?� �:• � � .. M�. � . � j � �Z . . .i... , r�' •' ' r V '• /, , r �� r- ' v'�� , _ , ,_ �a ; ' . , , �L . .:,.... ' ,� �. '; .� � � � � � • ,� / � ' 1 • � � ��! '.na,� l��f �� ' -. •.�, � � ` � � � � �. � � , :S �! ; �' ;! " '" � . � �:I� "' . . • ` _ i � � �, � . T _..i `� tJ• � ' +1�. _ ••.- _„ ,•,.e. � �. _ __... ._ .�rw�+. �..-..�._.. ___. `' . ... • ; .�.....�---�-�---^w� .�.�. 1 � • y `. �-..�,w� , • ' � . 1 {i ^�, � � . ;.Q•�1 • ( ` � . ' i . . . ' . . . . . . , ♦/ O i ; � �� . � . - .! � . � .. .. . . .�.._ � ....--• .. -�..r.�.�- /" �'��. . � � 4 s• . . V% � V . 1' i � 1 . ; .! ,yir �...� \ t ' � .. I ...,_F � �. ....... _ . _ •` . , .. ,. � � . . w ' , � �''~--�� . ;,. .� ' - !; ZOA #74-05 =.. ./'1 '� . . . . ( ��....'`- •T__�,,,.; _ ,,,� .� r ,�:::'�. RAO Mfg. Company , • , � , . l :.1 _ •i' � �.�.�..� ' ' ' � . �, , ` . . _ ' _ _ � � -- .:a,. � _' � ' r� ' .. +`,� j � ( . . r _ - . •. _ —' i �, '�� f. � ,. } M �� . , � : � �! .,�._� . �` ;�� L � . .��1 � "�%• � ' - � , ' p�e_ ,,: / . "' i � - / . ... .. .. � . � . u �Q 7�. J r�� 1s r::,,�: .� -_..,, � - ^ . f '_ . . -�� . . • o. -� � � r _ . t�• - : � . � ' i •,.. � � W „ .. � .. �7 � ,' .. I[ •. . , li k. , �• /� �"r' '. .? . � �q`� � � �.: �. � � . y ` . �. � , � } l/ — . ,� ,� • � 4 I .�• n � � , %�- _ �.r .. '� " ;:1 � .. .. . .�. �� ` ��..: � . . . . _. . ' '• .. ..R'=� . . . '�.�i • `�I � '-�� _ . . ..-t ' .. ' . .. � I�. � 1 . 1 _ � .. , ' . ..' . . . . ..�i. . _� ! . . 1. . V � � ' . f . i . ... . � 1 �' • ..V f' . • . 11i • •� . . � . t ? � " �'1 ♦ . � . . � . . .. � ' � �. T � i . . �( ' _ . � _� i..4 .. � ,�� , �i � � . ��i. .iw..+— - t y -- — ��`' — ^.I . �_ . ► ' � , . ::r s. ` . . ;i . .1 ' � �y i.! �� ` g � ' � , o �� . �y ,, _ 7 . , �:.. . ,{ ' !. . _ . 2. � ' �,, i , ' �.� . : � I �. W . ' � , 3 .+ �. � . I ,' .. Q - • , . +; ;w'�`��„_ .� '� ,. `?�� y I . "< ..�^ � . �Q`� l. y: . � . t � , F �_. _ • : i i ..., j . � - . . � •� � , h� i . t �� . • � � � . � • . r. I � i •.� � { � ' ,, �� .ry , . ;f1 � ..' , ' 11 . � . J �.� I' t . , C..,�. . . ' ' t , . ' .� ' . . '� . � i � { � � ( '•� ;� . , Rw ' . e. .4_f • , • '�. I ` . `� . � � .• • .. � M� a , �• ��' . . :�1c� •►' � '" + . � 1: ,, , . 1 I � ' � °r� ' t , ��' �y' � .• � . � \ • +. . f ' � , i. • . ` ' 1� � ,� � �+ � � � � ` �! i ,\ . ' ..' . .. ��, . 1. i � � � � .� �• `t.`•. � .. .. _ ... ' i..� r..—_•�e,�-•. � . r� _ � ..�- - _ _ __ _ .. _ , �� . ` �T r� - - : .. � � r • . . ,•",-+�.,..�-�_.. . ,' .`.'• . • •.�„_-----,_ .,_._ � . ;' n �f '� 1 �, ; • i ! .� � -• � :��'`�' � � '�r �i�' � rt. . . ,` . ', - • � .� rt „ja� � • 4.', i,�� '�ti �M .. -_ i. � `,I I '�- — _ •••—�� , . a.�' .. tf� �,.A � *� . , �' I `1' .•,' .3' k�d�SC1 ' • " . , ' � � �-�. hrYa'�// A, —:_..�`�----�- i'� .�...r , __ =d'C+ .L01�N�ic5�t73 "---=�i�l . , � !- i • • ��-- ' _"":�-----_ . { � �,, � . . �• ,. . • --..' a•, � � l •� r, ' M„ 1 , \\ � . � !� n7 M E T A L �',� �.� - �. �, »,�r,x;' t"Lt %� � "� . -}�. . ,.. ,, '. � = � GRAFTSMA'N rr'1 Ci�� o, �s'ri��.�y Frirl�.:y', ��innaa►sota GPnila�-��n: �� ' ' / � � January 10, 197s T�� p�1r� ,,T�n��facturin� Co^pa.�� Na�pect�'ully subrni�� far your co��i��ar��io�, ��ti t��ax'�*a21 ��ro��.�.1 fo� r�?,onl.��:, va»iar_ce �.r� ::tit��ck and ap�Iic�.�ia� �� builcli.ng pax��:iL to ena��l� t.�.�; s corpora�I.on tQ build a:1&zuf�cturirg facilit� in t�a Ci �;� of = ri�l��. ��Q :`;�:'►lZ��C'tU�`in� Comnan� is a :��.n.�a�s�ta COZ"DUY'E��iQn en�;�.��c3 pri:�a•,��r' �.n t�� n�n�i��c��ur� a:� .^.t��t�m :he�� :��a? shapss9 sJvl ��:.n�:�s &AG� 3'��:rl��.::� as�am�' iu�. Qur svrvic;�� incl�� de�i�r., ang�.n�4rin�, and toal s�::� die ma'�in� in a�ditia�^ to fa..r3:caL�.�n. ��;., r„�.,,n, �_�: a':�. �'` �"; � p �' ° �"1`,�' "'�_ �' f�.'; i�+32=�a'It3. Qtzr f?AeI*� t;1.��7 is �ler�n anci t�rd�rly wi �h�.n t:?a p? �n� a:�c3 a�' a non di ��iz„'�ir_� natu��e �i�r.��.t. Our op�ra��.on in=rolv�� S m�;nimur� amount of truci{ �r��'�ic �:�d n� o�,z�si�.e wor� �r °:,-v�ra�s. s�is cor��:��g �as fo�.znde� �n Oc �o�� 2, 19?0 and was inaorp��aLed !J.?�2CLS� i''�� l��rs a� i��i�a�3a�a in 192?. 4ur ori�inal lacati�n ��.�a� zn tns ��in��a�olis ?�op �4 j0� Sa�i�h �'o�zx`th St!�gQt. in �.��: w�� ouilt a 1Q,�� aa�:�r� ��o-a pxant �� 1.JO�J �gTn:;�ls Avzz�a� :�cr�h. in 19�3 �Y� st�uirad ou-r prssen� 31,OU0 s�ua��e foat �aciiit,� at� 2010 iyart'n F'o�.�^�h �ty e� �, t.rinneapoli�. C�u�• prs �snt ?�cration d��3 not pvTmit furti��r e:�na��3? on, nnd i:� . an�ici.pa�.'�on �� future �ro��z �+e sh��z1� like �o relocate on s�iii:ab?e acr�a�e in the Cit� of F�i31sy. � �r.'Fe��uar�y 5,�1971 w4 p�rc�as�� o� c�ntrac� for d�3d . l�..9b Aeras o� lind in t�:e Ci�,�v of Fridle�T. 1�e are prese�t�.y in the �r�cess of p�L»chssin� an��her st�.�.;� of' land �bu�t�n.� this pro��r�;� w�i��l would brl�� i�'r.� t:.4�� aaraage to 5.75. 'L�� total p�ra�� is b��lnded. on th� nor�h by :�ississippi Sts-�eet, on �!�e �lest by ths �urli��`ton :�.�^�chsrn ?+�ilwaq right of way, on thc� �c��.�th by a lin3 36o f�� fro:� +hs north�rn bo�ar.�ar� nnd pa��llal to �.t, ar_d on t:�:� eust �y t:.Q pr�p�r�y line of Frid1�7 Our C��rr_ �iar�war�. t��e ho�� -ua ao.�pi��a tr�is purch�sQ an:? settl�� Lh�� co:z�tr�et �or dee3 an oc�r � res�ntl,y awned prop�rt� bef'or� Januar;; 31, x975. . - �'1 2010 NORTH, FOURTH STREET �r MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55411 PHONE (612y 522-3344 � � r1 �4 '„9 �x� t�;�tit3vely plannin� an ��.ziid�ng � !.��,JUJ :��tit�r�a 4 , � T,� ;-� ��; �n �� b��'i , irt th° ��`; ��=� =�� -c�7a f��.. Ds.�T1� 'ri].�:2 Ct?...! �,. LL., o-�- �i�Q C7i?�ZE:�::.OYl 13r. �?�2'.•.Ii t7 T?;rnt;L?3. 4re n�^� �'$V'�93�,.�i.':'i� 1�.b:.,i�, �.t�iti'lEi rt . ��. ►.,*M1 �asto�.l» �7!� f�� oi' t'�3s n�.rcal b� ��7on�d ;'r�_r. C-?-,:: �., � , t:�a ;^LP:s�r.�: c1a33��'i��t� an �'o. �h� r3�t of tt P�:r��r:.yr. 'r;.� a,�� al:�o rPC�:�s��lr.g � varia�!c� i� sa��a� � o� tha ri��u'n ::i.c:v af thia �r: ��^�; �'^o� i�s �'^A��r� l0U �A�t to 7� ��ef,. �hi� wou��' ena�le u� �'to er�ct nc;.r i��. �ya� ��ild�.:zg b�sica? 11 �.� L�:u C�_li;g�' {�i' �',i'1-;. C^Q=?a�'^�;�' �r�.�Ci {'j1�te�r9 La:..i7�Yl��i1 't0 I?� . x..:� ui'?'� w� � �. �s� i�zg c�n�iruc ai�r_, ,�.;�, �il.l. u� t�'nla to co�Qi.�s;na�'t i:,ha s��°1� ^or�w�.n ��' a1�� r�z��z��.ts:i�;h �'��.1 aai.��:a..r�.-ar� , scr�un= n� :Ynic^ w? 1? :`�� C�,z��.ad d�ari�s� �an,y i*xt,��r�s �*�pa:ns? an (�h� :,T�s��A: ? y pa� zio�i of' ��i�. ��r.c3 �F�.11�L� ��.c'cs��a i�o�r� ��i�n by tiZ�� :i.'�s�isai^;�i :a�r��t ,z�Zd3�n��a ) . '1_'i:�� bu. � � �a�.:1:�, t,v�uit� s3-� . si:n��lA ��^F� �tat ar�� 1+�an in a��ar.��x;�t �;�::3 wo�al� cunf'�-:�n� . to n':� bEZ�.�,:�ir_g r�a�si� a�:=�:a�s ��' �n� vit? nl" Fr�.��i.az�. �i.p p�.ac: �o �uil� :� �l�.:z� ��.a� w:i�? � 'r�e a� �ss� � ta Fr� d:;.�y' 3 �r�� , .; . _ a�.� ds�r43.n�.��r.�. ` ` ' ' � . �fa hope �n��.o�ai° pro3Nctions m�� wi��. ,you�° a�proval. � . - _ : _ -. . Kesoaatf'u3.ly s!�.�miti,�c�� j . � r . ! /�,.. . . • ' " , . ... . ,. / / � =/.t.rr�/ � , ` L.�-�. . . y�. � � �. . f - i� -.i� _ . . . . . ` Ricnard A. 01sen, i�is�-tra�id�:�L _ . , ,:, . RAO�. �anu�'�otu: in� �a�o:�ny , , . �, .; � MEMO T0: Virgil Nerrick, City Attorney �� ^ MEMO FRDM: Uarrel Clark, Community Developrnent Administrator MEMO DATE:� January 23, 1975 RE: M-1 Code interaretation for RAO Manufacturing Company The City of Fridley's Planning Comrnission is in the process of considering a rezoning request by RAU htanufacturing Company to rezone one portion o� their property from C-2S to M-1, which would if granted, make all their� property one zane, M-1 (light industrial). � At the Commissi�n meeting of January 22, 1975, the question arose as to whether or not the RAO P�anufacturing Cornpany would be a permit�ed:use in a M-1 - Uistrict. The problem arose wnen it 4�ras learned that they da metal stamping � and as per C�ty Code, Section 2U5.I32 (Uses Excluded in M-I} E, Founcfaries or. metal fabrication �lants, appears. On the other hand, Section "Z05.131 (Uses Permitted in M-1} states the manufacturing of many items which would.require metaT fabrication are al�lowed. Would you please give us a written opinian on wheth�r RA0 is a pern�itted � use in a M=1 district. I�have included a letter from RAO which explains the I, plant operation. If you need more clarification on their operation, please '� call them. It should a7so be noted that they did app�ar befQre th2 City Council � in 1971 and did receive a concept approval, so that might bear on any final decision. � � (minutes also included.) . - r�"'� . . This item was contin�ted by the Planning Commissian to their meeting of February 5, 1y75, so your response by January 31st would: be app►^eciated. , � I : � Cl.AR � ( _ Commanity Development Administrator � . ��ae � ; . ENC. : 2 0 � � S1 � � i � MEMORANDUM �� i Ta: Darrel Clark, Community Development Administrator From: Virgil C. Herrick, City Attorney Re: M-1 Code Interpretation for RAO Manufacturing Company ' bate: January 30, 1975 • I acknor.sledge receipt of your memo dated January 23, 1975, regarding the above subject. Attached to said memo was a letter from Richard A. Qlsen, Vice President of RAO Manufacturin.g Company, and copies of couneil minutes of January 18, 1971. In the memo you ask mg opinion as to whether the proposed use ot - the subject property by RAO Manufacturing Company would be permitted under � the City of. Fridl.ey 2orcing Cade pertaining ta I�-1 district:s. Yau indicated in your memo that RA0 would do "metal starnping". Fridley City Code Section 205.132 lists th�se uses that are excluded in an M-1 districC. One of the excluded. uses is"foundries or metal fabrication plants". The code does not specifically refer ta "metal stamping,". I presume that metal stamping could be a type of inetal fabricatian; however, it would be my opinion that alZ forms of inetal stamping are not to be excludecl from M-i districts. I know that we presently have industries lacated on M-1 property that do engage in meta3 stamping. _ It would be my opinion that the governing section on this type of use would be 205.133, ent.itled General Performance Standards. This section reads in part as follows: "Uses which because of the nat.ure of their apera- tion are accompanied by excessive noise, dust, dirt, smoke, noxious gases, odor, vibration, glare, heat or explasives shall not be permitted. These residuaZ fea�ures shall be cansidered as excessive in the following cases:" (The section then goes on to set acceptable standards for the above matters.) This section also states that the city council may require the owner or ogerator to make investigations and tests to show adherence to the perform- ance standards. I believe that the applicant should be made aware of the performance standards and that he should consult with the city administration to make certai.n that the proposed use will meet these standards. The adminis- trative staff in reviewing the plans shou�d pay particular attention to the amount of noise or vibration that would be expected from this aperation. Plans shauld then be devised so as to keep these items within the lim.its permitted. i note in the minutes of the council meeting of January Y8, ],971 � that the applicant inquired of the city prior to buying the subject propertq . as to whether his operation would be permitted. Representatives of the company dzscussed thea�r business operation with the city council and they were advised �.� ( � -Z- that said operation would. be permitted on the subject property. I am certain that the applicant relied on this assurance in purchasing the progerty: I believe that the city should take the same position with the applicant at this time that it took at the time of the original inquiry; i.e. that is that the ' use is permi.tCed suhject to the city's performance standards. - VCH/jlh 'I � ; ; � � � � � �- ; ; � , i { , ; , , � i . . � ! ; � ; ; � or� �5-6E3 � ; LOT SPL.I T APPLI CAT� CITY OF �RID�.EY APPLICAl`iT:,�� ////Ci %�� A �' /."'' `� �'C�ry' ADDRESS • /y�� G' �' �' ,t.' ,t�i3- C.:. i; �'L• St�eet City Zip Code � � TELEPiiOi�' � � �� C / G � Ho�►e Bus�.ness Pt�OPIl�'1�`I Oi�Fi; �i. ( S } �//-"' �, ��'' �� -:��./�ri'� % u f'l � //'�% ``f' -'/%'�—�, �8 A�plicant' s Iya�� Lot Split��~°�'�3� I�ate File�s � Eee: �,_s �' ��tecei�t �r� Council Action: T,��te _ RF�'It�iS : � . �'7 Li �.. . ADI}RESS( ES )�� /��/i /= ' . / i^ � ' .� .. Stree� City - Zip Cocie ,, ' Street , u � City Zip.Code �TELEPFiONE #C S ) �.?r� � f Hau�e Bur�ineae � �'xoparty Loc�.tior, on St�.eet � �``I G1 C�1,�-4 �� /�G-�i� or E�cacic Street Address (I� Ai�Y) '�% �� L�gal Description of Prop�rtY� ParCe1 44f} 1 � T . except the North 30 feet for public utilities.& street, Audltor's Sub. #108 d X�Gd �':��. r9v Reason for Lot Split: Rarcel 440 Par�el.4 Q � ��-� � � r ,� ; - ,��L��; ,��= � �?_ .7��'� i�� r� � Onondaga. 1600 Orrondaga will be 8$�`Lot 1618 93' Lot X ��f '�f y° � Total Area of �raperty sq. ft. Zoni.n� Cla��iiication R- The.undersi�rned hereby dec�ases that a,ll the facts and . rep.reaentations stated in this application axe txue �nd . correet. -�i ' DAT E�._ Z 5' '7j"� SIGNATURE, j ' ,� u•• i B�L(�W �'OR GITY tTSr� Q?��I,Y (Se�} ��ue.rea esi�� fox aciditioxtai ir;�truc�ion� .�„ PI,ATS & SUBS: Date of Con�ideration - � ' � Remar'ks : r � gLAtlidlNG CO,��iISSIOtZ: Date of Consideratian - _ � Re[ns.rke : � CITX COII?ZCIL: Date of Consider�ztion - Remasks: ' _-,.------- � � yb.2� � i�- ,., � I ��'� �� - � I �jrn�r`�� (y� ,� lr1 � 4 . � , E... . . �, '''� (`y 1.. � i � ST, ic� , .,.-,, , ( � � . ,i�/ z , �n DEAN HARMON �_. __._, t,, ,�r ` �� . �- 7�. ., �.. l.S. #75-01 _ i �0,;/v a . : � � � �. y� � � .., : -�.^, ' � :� ' �+ j � . . .... . ;.,� � -��..Ot,..' � ,► j: � x � � y!�D .� �5 ,,,a � z»�t � , . .., ; - -= ,� � �'�'�:��,, . � . _. .. � ; �n ry , r'{ � . . : JJ � . a+� � .J# � "I :� ry, � � � � � . Q� ��1: (..`� . ' . "_� „ � �'6 . 7 •+ , 4" �'� � �.` � •, . , � -- - � ; � - ~ • .,. .,...., � �o � < � . yy�-� ; :, :�9 �C �9 R � f �ZJ3.6c �39�L.. . ... s ' � --- -� � �r — ----- .�.: � � ., � .v, . _ _..-�- --- 'I . . . � : y�2; f ' ° � ��`��; � °c� ; �.3 � � 6 � � -- 2A� - -- �iis'� j� -�n� zs, _ �.��,�� ; %- ' ��° .� � -� � o �� j ' � i5�o . � � � � i' � , . !1 �° � �. . . � . . , . ,,`.�� , "� /4 � �L 1 � ` ,., � � _/ # � .�.• (� ,, � ,b„ . �► � C� . , ` +�GJ,,�, � � z ( � 4 � � � �� 3 t/� �� _ � �+. . � � ..90 0 ` . A �� v�'_+� �/y ij � '7� i `��ib ; : � � : --� ; `' _ � „ W � � v '�� 7. ,, % s r ., i� : c'� ., � ,� � .' �'� �� . ,. . . � - � �.� 3 � ._._-' �?� r: � 752 � b7 - ;�� ' �"�. � �`' ,; , �: 7�. . , . �� N I -1 � ,,? �� :,, � e� o � , 7�1 S ��- cr , � ,n, r�,yo. , --5 � ,� �� , ., a � Rt' `` -- � � � � `n � I _1 ��p Z9 ` � � ....1 i 4:' 1 r1-.--�p ��V ' .t� . � , �b'3. — -j- �T`�7q - l: : � , r � � 15 � � � 4`� )`. � W <,,�., �, �� . O � y_i c . � " . .-�� Y.- zo : ,� �= . . 3; � � ; . � . ` �p• �; � l.� �Z �ti ;�� °� �t�� ;��: � � �-�� _�'� - S;_ � ; 2 ,6, � �°�. ��. � � '" _ � . < �.:. �y �^ol�� 3a�?° ` ,� � �� a �J� 6f � �O }:a '�� - 67 .7.°. � , -�' '.'Y 23j2S. �y . ?; , . . � � A'p'fy.' ! W � . . . . . . R . . � - -- ^ -:�=^ - �_r_ _A_ E'`., --:.��6�_- AVE.— - F. , � •.E--1�:-E.— - 0 33a �1 w i7 — B •, , � ,� , l57y�-�58y � --- -,r , . . �' tSG�I � ;�, � ��:o�; ��Z� ,bN�;�� 5° _ ; " t6�� 1� o ` • �'�d.b► ' � � . Mor�in 1 9 . ��j ,�� _� ; }"' � f=LQn; I �%i�e` r � .�t o ` , t� " w� �, � • �, � l ��y� �� . �� .. . `. . . 4 ' . .. .. . c . . K.Nr,►�e, �ss; � a 4��1 � _. � o ,�n ,a ds _,� _ f•.-:•w o � i�s �� • � , ,-�} .�( ,�s yyZ �:. y z, J , '�J(j �y iy � � � � h'�! t�'✓y �� u-� 4 : a`/ I� �a a J� � a � (�1 ` ��.-.�,iVa f: , > � FL37 �'�'' � �� n ° , � �i (•� ii�/d) 'iN (SOO� K T S• ' •� Z � �°�D ''`7��" „y /F��m � `�'� � s - :-, � 'R�1P��a . i� "� ta 7�� • ..,e� 4 b .. 6 . �� UO ...//O • / � � .. � '� �� '�' s` .,�,� '� � 7�3�! � 77.�!"�'�� ' /� . °° . �� )�.�b "u' � . . ` � � p.. ��C W l' ��./ �.Y__ �'4,l�B.__ Mi �/ �J� � � � �/ ! �j� I' � - ��J, J{� - ..Q . T , . . �� p.� l � `,� � � �'�iO . 7 'V D �� / /V _ �y � . :jf�� v "� �� ID� � +��+� ' V '°�'% 0 m � � � Q. , ,00 •, 4 � =-� y�i j , r.J � �. _,,�_ � a- �`v i � o i;� �.: z.e .� g,:,.- � t i3� .. �(y,� .an�:�FF ., 9¢ , a6 9,- : ; a �o,o,,� ; - � : �b � �y, o � �,y8� � � �.af�f��i� ' 3 r ,' oo ^��0 � � 9 � �i� 9 �, ld:�t o, s� ;. p y� � LJy' 1 3 � 7� , � 6 fl .1b ., .., .�, � , p . a,/r`, .'�. �4 'o , �/ � �,�., � � I S 13 _ _ � - SO DD° yj9 � Qti �:i j3 . , ».. • c ''} � . EE T , Q N� N D A G O �--��—Bf--�-�-- -�-=-F�� :, �,-- - /O �•_ 8Z � -+.T� .Bs.J � i+W.f ` ��Vy ��' ,� � - •�� v YTb " - . .., � ' , .. /� " I � /y c ' ! �4�� 45�� 1_"�/u ,2 , � (5� (5�� ~ . �j N �o� ,,;,6d �, q .� 3. ��. �- 7376 �6 ° 28a�y; , � � � D. _ fl � (� P t ,r :�� — -- y _l �1?/Oi � f, i � (32�� JN � v 93 � � ,V�� ; � .,�.o � � ; �'�� / � ;. �fso� � � 1� ' : �•.s►� :. a � $ 73bo � � . �Z/.ii7% Y . . . , �2�8� �1 > (y� � �" e � � . . ! ' � •�i . 4 . . � C� O� . b ^/ • 7� �/2 j + R � 1 ::A �...-�-' L �O'�� . � v� �il �� ~ 0 �i� i 4 .. � AVE NE. . i'�__...��V�. � .' � . � . � 'v. . . ^ '' V . . � . � � ( (�20c� �7.iF0) �1 (F�YJJ i . ` � S (f/i�.r�.':a•wv'' c'2+ ,eti ,,� 9 � � . � dece.f "ho�rrn• �L- • ` � � � ,�rfawr�es� � � � .e ,�;:�►►•': �.�F�. . � , � �y� �v ^.-- - 73�0 ; ��t i 4 �I ��/� l�l�• �� J ' � '�.'... ��ti'�gtv) . � I �� A I `s7c Cfdo> ��f<� ' , i 'O ' � . ' � ( bs , � 159� �b19 � fr�°' ;� �S NO� t0 8 , �y� 1�8s�1 �S �:�. ; l6y� � �6� /�67 /d�'.� r �o i .r I�}� I � " � �' . B • _ . � �� S,��r��e�o�s C'�r�i�`i��%� COMSTOCK & DAVIS, INC. Consulting Engineers a»cl I.ai�d Surveyors 1445 County Road J, MpIs., N1ini�. 55432, 784-9346 . L4T SURVEY �'dR: DEAN HARMON L.S. #�75-0I. PART 0� LOT 4, . 1618 (?PJQNDAGA ST. , N. E. AUDITORS SU�DIVISION NQ. 108 �RIpLEY, MiNN�SOTA - ANOKA.COUNTY, MINN. : . � . . . . - . . �: __l99./9-- . 1 �: - �. � . �' - � � �. � ` . - , , - - - - 93 0 0 - - -. � � �Nor�i�i I�e i9�a! S�l. �t/a. �08 �� .. o � � '---� t,f ONONDAGA � �� ST. . � - � . �' � - -- oo-- _ . ��. . . o _ - .- 9 � �, , . � i � � ' t F : , �" a i � r � . . . _ � �N �� _, . . . : . , - . � �d, �i -. � . . , � ' �. ��5.63' i p - � . �8.¢ _ . . . � - _ .� � � .' � ; ' M �4 � _ ` „� . • _ ._ . � .. � . � � i '�; 0 .24.6 � � 0 � �� . � � . , + N � h s.zs I �• � � � � n h �,` � : 4 ( � � � � Q ' ` C � ; ` � � . ' �f. t : ' ! ( _ . � : � � - . . . � 3 . : �� : , . . .�.�'� � uf � ,tl 1 � . � � ` . i� . � � � . . ,, t . _ � - �� t i _ . �� i99.o8 "93.00 -- . � � : . _ � � - . _ � /98.�4'.s' �: Sav�ii /i�ie o�,�v��4, yv� Sv,� �t/n. /OB � . LEGAL DESC�tIPTIOV: The East 93 feet of the P�orth 1/3 of Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision - No. 108, Anoka County, Minnesota. Subjec� to an easement to the City o� Fridl�y __ over the North 30 feet and subject to ather easements of record, if any. I' _ _ : SCALE: i"� .so' � : _ - . . . : . _ E� u�eno�es ira� mo�umenf �'ovno� ' . � � � . - I O deno�es ir'ar� monurr�enf set � � � hereby certify that this•survey, plan or report was prepared by me or und�r rny ciirect supecvision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Nlinnesota. � - . �'� �,�� . �a83,2 � i z9/�� 3� �� . � Reg. No. Date Job No.