The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 05/21/1975 - 7512� CITY OF FRIDLEY AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MAY 21, 1975 CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MAY 7, 1975 RECEIVE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSISSION SUBCOMMITTEE MIf�UTES: APRIL 28,' 1975 RECEIVE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES: APRIL 29, 1975 RECEIVE PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS-STREETS & UTILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: MAY 13, 1975 � RECEIVE BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: MAY 14, 1975 . �,� �� 1. 2. 3. CONSIDERATION OF A VACATION REQUEST: SAV #75-02, BY LOREN S��ERUD: Vacate th Avenue N.E. between 3rd Street N.E. and University Avenue N.E. to allow the cons�ruction of a 24 ft. by 24 ft additi�n at 4603 3rd Street N.E. CONSIDERATION OF A VACATION REQUEST: SAV #75-03, MACHI�(ING, INC.: Vacate the alley in Block 5, Spring 8rook Park Addition, that lies between Ashton Avenue and the rai7road ttacks, to allow for an addition that will joint two existing building at 140 Liberty Street N.E. DISCUSSION ON BIKEWAY PROPOSAL ADJOURNMENT: � � .r 8:00 P.M. PAGES 1 - 10 11 - 14 15 - 17 18-21 22 - 23 24 - 31 32 - 38 PLANNIN� COMMISSION MEETING !'� CALL TO ORDER: CITY OF FRIDLEY MAY 7, 1975 Chairman Harris called the meeting ta order at 8:30 P.M. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Harris, Lindblad, Drigans Members Absent: Meissner, Peterson Others Present: James Langenfeld, Ex-officio Member Jerrold Boardman, Planning Assistant APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: APRIL 23, 1975 .PAGE 1 MOTION by Lindblad, seconded by Drigans, that the Planning Commission approve their rninutes of the Apri1 23, 1975 meeting as written. Upon a voice vote, ,11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVE BOARD OF APPEALS SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: APRIL 29, 1975 � . MOTION by Drigans, seconded by Lindblad, that the Planning Commission receive the minutes of the Board of Appeals Subcommittee meetinq of April 29, 1975. Upon a voice vote, a1Z voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 1. CONTINUEQ: REQUEST FOR A LOT SPLIT, L.S. �71-08, BY CLIFFORD J. THOE: To split � off the Westerly 70 feet of the Southerly 123 feet, except for that part taken � for highway purposes, of Lot 18, Block 2, Central View Manor, to split the residence from the service station property, the same being 7240 Central Avenue N.E.: �� Mr. Clifford Thae and Mr. Charles Jordon, lessee of the service station, were present. ' Mr. Harris said that in the Planning Commission agenda they have an agreement '�etween Lyndale TerminaT Company (Noliday�;� and the City of Fridley, as a sample agreement, and he couldn't see that this agreement was pertaining to the type of situation on Mr. Thoe's property, so it wasn't any help in determining what.could be dane on this lot split request. Mr. Drigans said this was a very difficult problem. Mr. Boardman said there were several points to make on this request. He said that th.e parcel the petitioner wanted to split off would be too smallof a lot for comnercial zoning, and it didn't meet the minimum requirements of a residential lot either because it was only b300 square feet. This house was a legal non-conforming use and if it was destroyed over 50°0 of its value, it cQuld not be rebuilt. If this happened, this lot could not be used for either commerical or residential use. Mr. Boardman said that Mr. Jordon was willing to purchase the service station, but not the residence, so this was the reason for the lot split. If Mr. Jordon could purchase just the service station property he was willing to�make certain improvements to this property. These improvements would not be made without the lot split or if the purchase was not completed. Mr. Boardman continued, that the Planning Commission would have to determine, if by approving this lot split, the improvements that would be made to the commercial use of the property would ju�stify this approval, and would .._ _ . '�!►'°� Plann�ng Commission Meeting May 7, 1975 � Page 2 justify the problems we could have la�ter on, because of this lot split. � Mr. Drigans said that if the Planning Commission were inclined to approve this lot split, they should look at what kind of improvements they could expect on the service station property. Mr. Harris asked if the entire lot met the requirements for a carr�nercial lot. Mr. Boardman said the entire lot was around Z0,000 square feet, which was the requirement for a commercial lot. He said the requirement was for 20,000 square feet or 160 foot frontage at the setback line and was an either/or situation. If the 6300 square feet were�split off this parcel, then nei�her parcel would meet this requirement. He said there would have to be an easement for water service also, � because the house gets it water from the service station. * Mr. Drigans asked what was stopping the service station lessee from improving the property under the present circumstances? Mr. Boardman said he didn't want to put a 1ot of money into proper•�ty he did no� own. � ' Mr. Drigans asked if this property couldn't be owned under joint tenant, so the lot split wouldn't be needed? Mr. Harris said they could, but then they would both have title to the entire parcel. Mr. Drigans said he thought there should be some type of legal agreement that could be drawn up so the residence wouldn't have to be split from the service station. He said that this property wouldn't be worth much to anyone if it was split up into small segments. He said they already share water facilities, and there could be many problems in the future, if this lot split was granted. Mr. Harris said that if ther� was a contract drawn up, giving each ^ party their rights and obl�gations, this would be a better way to handle this property. Mr. Boardman said he didn't know if a legal agreement between the two parties 'would satisfy the requirements for a mortgage commit m en t on the service station property. He said mortgage companies were pretty skepticai the way it was. Mr. Lindblad said he thought we had a bad situation now, with one parcel, and if there were two parcels, there would be twice as many problems. He said the house couldn't be rebuilt now if it was over 50% destroyed, and if something would happen to the service station, that could be rebuilt because it was properly zone�t, but you would be allowing construction on a sub-standard lot. Mr. Boardman said that if this lot split was approved, and the house was destroyed, the City would almost be obligated to let a�commercial enterprise go on this lot with variances, because we created this situation with the approval of the �ot split. He said the only thing that the Planning Commission could do, if this lot split was granted, was to stipulate that when the house was gone, no building could ever be built on this parcel, either a residence or a commercial enterprise. Then an adjacent owner might buy this parcel. Mr. Harris said that if an adjacent owner didn't buy the parcel, it would go tax forfeit, because it was a useless lot by itself. Mr. Origans said he still felt that a legal document could be drawn up so this lot split would not be necessary, and yet it could meet the requirements for +,,., financing. Mr. Lindblad said he couldn't recommend approval of this �lot split because he thought they would just be creating a problem .for the future. He said that if the residential property were split off from the service station, the station owner, ��:,�� Planning Commission Meeting - May 7, 1975 � Paqe 3 whether it was this station owner, or one in the residential property as long as they didn't have would be better for everyone concerned. future; would never buy t�e to.: He thought a legal agreement � Mr. Langenfeld said this agreement could be as joint tenants in common and shnw it "as their interest may appear". Mr. Harris said it would be up to the financial institution as to what kind of legal agreement they would accept and still be willing to give financing, and they may be able to draw up some private covenants that the financial institution would accept. Mr. Thoe asked!if the ordinance read right now that if his house was destroyed over 50% he couldn't rebuild? Mr. Harris said that it did. Mr. Thoe said that if this happened, who would be the loser except himself? Mr. Harris said that suppose that consequence did happen and Mr. Thoe.:was left with this lot, which would leave him the choice of selling to either one of the adjacent property owners. Then suppose to all intents and purposes, they offered h,im next to nothing for this property. If Mr. Thoe was left with a lot that he couldn't do anything with and he couldn't sell it, in seven years it would probably go tax forfeit. Then the City and the County are left with a parcel of unbuildable, �°�iusable land that we created with • the approval of the lot split. This was what the Planning Commission was trying to avoid. Mr. Thoe asked if the Ci'ty wouldn't let that house be rebuilt to keep the taxes coming in? Mr. Harris said they would not, because this was a legal non-conforming use. It was a zoning problem more than the size of the lot. He said that if there were no service station on this property, and the only thing on this parcel was the house, it still couTd not be rebuilt if it was destroyed more than 50� of its value. � Mr. Boardman said the City could not�grant a variance on what was allowed in '` a zoning district. The City does not allow a house to be built in a C-2 zone, and the nroperty would have to be rezoned to R-1 to allow a house to be rebuilt on •this property and the City was not in favor of spot rezoning either. Mr. Boardman said tnis house was built in 1949. When our zoning ordinance went into effect in January of 1956, this property was zoned C-2, and it has been zoned C-2 since that time. Mr. Thoe said there had been a lot of discussion of the City's point of view. Ne thought there should be consideration of the resident, especially as he was an - old timer in Fridley. Ne said f�hat if he was ill or crippled or something and was depending upan this property. Mr. Lindblad said that was why he was better off to leave this in one parcel, because if this 1ot was split, he wouldn't have any bargining pawer ihen, because the lot would be useless. Mr. Thoe said he thought the residence would sell in nothing flat if he put it up for sale. He thought resale would be no problem. Mr. Boardman said that if this was handled by a legal agreement., this agreement could cause a problem if this property was sold, because someone else might not want to take over such an agreement. Mr. Drigans said the reason we are in this position was because the station operator wants to improve the service station, and before he does this, he wants to purchase the station. Mr. Drigans said he didn't feel this was enough of a hardship ta warra�t approving the lot split. Mr. Langenfeld said he felt that if this residence was.up for sale and the �� prospective buyer knew that thfs property was a legal non-conforming use with the " restrictions on rebuilding the house, that would make the saleability almost nil. �—� � Planning Commission Meeting - May 7, 1975 Page 4 Mr. Boardman said that he, as a planner, would have to recommend that this lot split be denied, and forego the beautification of this property at this time, and hope that in five, six, or eight years into the future, that someone would come along � who would be ready to purchase the entire parcel. He said we had to think of the present and the future. If this lot split was granted now, what problems would we . have in the future. Mr. Harris said he thought they would be creating a monster. Mr. Boardman said he thought it would be in the best interests of Mr. Thoe to sell this as an entire parcel also. Mr. Thoe said that Mr. Jordon has worked up a good business in the service statian, and it would all be for nothing if he couldn't purchase this property. He said he thought this had been continued by the Planning Commission so they could _corne up with an alternate solution. � Mr. Harris said that was true, and he was very sorry, but they hadn't been able to come with any alternative to make the lot split.feasible. The only alternative they could_see would be to seek legal counsel and find a legal means to settie this problem. Mr. Drigans said the Planning Commission didn't feel this parcel was large enough to be chopped up into smaller parcels. � Mr. Harris said he thought the Planning Commission should make their recommendatian to Council, and in the interim, the petitioner should seek 1ega1 advise and see how this could be handled without a lot split. He said that Council would have to make the final determination, anyway. • � Mr. Boardman said that if the petitioner could work this out legally, he could withdraw his petition, and this wouldn't have to go to Council. The only action the Pl.anning �Commission could take would be to approve or deny the lot split request. They couldn't make a decision on any legal agreement. He told Mr. Thoe that this agreement could cover the splitting of assessments also. Mr. Harris said that if a motion was made for denial of�this request, the reasons for the denial should be given. Mr. Langenfeld said he thought the Planning Commission was in agreement that this was a unique situation and they might be creating a hardship for the petitioner in suggesting that he get legal counsel, but he thought that in doing this, the petitioner would be saving himself a lot of trouble in the long run. This lot split could be a big headache in the future. Mr. Harris said he agr.eed. Mr. Drigans said he thought this request had been at this level for a long time, and it s.hould be passed on to the City Council. MOTION by Drigans, seconded by Lindblad, that the Planninq Commission recommend to Council denial of the request for a Lot Sp1it, L.S. #71-08, by Clifford J. Thoe, to split off the Westerly 70 feet of the Southerly 123 feet, except for that part taken for highway purposes, of Lot 18, B1ock 2, Central View Manor, to split the residence fr.om the service station property, tl�e same being 7240 Central.Avenue N.E. for the following reasons: ^� 1 The lot split would create two substandard Iots, in which one would be completely un�buildable. � _ - � � -..�+� _.. Planning Commission Meeting - May 7, 1975 Page 5 2.. A situation exists whereby both structuresobtain water from the same service. � r"1 � 3. One of the reasons �for the request was because the service station lessee � wanted to purchase the service station portion of the property to improve the property, and there may be a legal means for settlirig this problem between the two parties without a lot split being granted. 4. This would not be prudent City planning. UPON a voice vote, a1,� voting a�e, the motion carried unanimousl.y. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #75-03, BY ORVILLE JACOBSON: To allow the construction of a second accessory building, a 24' x 24' garage on the South 100 feet of Lot 7, Block 2, Brookview Second Addition, per Fridley City Code, Section 205.051, 2, A, the same being 6606 Brookview Drive N.E. � Mr. & Mrs. Jacobson were present. MOTION by Drigans, secor�ded by Lindblad, that the Planning Commission open the Public Hearing on the request for a Special Use Permit, 5P #75-03, by Orville Jacobson. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Chairman Harris declared the hearing open at 9:34 P.M. � Mr. Baardman said this was an extra large lot, 100' x 215' and the present � 20 ft. x 14 ft. garage would be moved and used for a storage shed. This would be behind the new 24 ft.x 24 ft. garage. He said that because of the large lot, the staff saw no problem with this request. Mr. Drigans asked what was north of the Jacobson property. Mrs. Jacobson said it was an empty lot. Mr. Jacobson said he would move the existing garage onto a slab and it would be anchored down. Mr. Drigans asked if there woul�d be access to the garage tnat was being moved so that it could be used for the storage of automobiles. Mr. Jacobson said there wouldn't be enough room, because there would only be 13 feet between the house and the new garage and the fireplace and some shrubs took most of that room. Mrs. Jacobson said they planned to store a camp trailer in the o1d garage. Mr. Drigans asked if they had talked to any of their neighbars about this request. Mr. Jacobson said they all got notices of this request, and they only had one close neighbor. Mr. Harris asked if there would be any utilities in this garage. Mrs. Jacobson said there would be electrici:ty. ' Mr. Boardman said the staff had•received a letter for the Planning Commission from the Michael Servetus Church. , ^ MOTION by Lindblad, seconded by Drigans, that the PZanning Comrnission receive the letter from Michael Servetus Church. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Chairman Harris read the letter which stated that they had no objection to this request. � . - �� Planning Commission Meeting May 7, 1975 � Pa� Mr. Harris asked if the new garage would match the existing structures on the lot. Mr. Jacobson said it would have verticaT siding instead of horizontal, ''� but it would all be painted the same. � � � Mr. Langenfeld said they should stipulate ihat the old garage be used for storage and not for any commercial enterprise. MOTION by Lindblad, seconded by Drigans that the Planning CommissionOrvolle the Public Hearing on the request for a Special Use Permit, SP #75-03, by Jacobson. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Chairman Harris declared the hearing closed at 9:45 P.M. . MOTION by Lindblad, seconded by Drigans, that the Planning Commission recommend to Council approv�l of the request for a Special Use Permit, SP #75-03, by Orville Jacobson, to allow the construction of a second accessory buiJding, a 24 ft. x 24 ft. garage, on the South 10� feet of Lot 7, B1ock 2, Brookview 2nd Addition, per Fridley City Code, Section 205.051, 2, A, the same being �6G6 �rookview Drive N.E., with + the following stipulations. 1. The single car garage not be used for a commercial enterprise and that it be placed on a proper foundation. 2. 3. Both accessory bui.Zdings match the appearance of the house. Both garages meet a11 the code requirements. UPON a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #75-03, CITY OF FRIDLEY: Rezone from M-2 heavy industrial areas to C-2 general business areas , a previously public owned parcel, part of Lot 38, Auditor's Subdivision No. 39, so this property will be zoned to conform with the present use, the same being 3720 East River Road N.E.. MOTION by Lindblad, seconded by Drigans, that the Planning Commission open the Public Hearing on �he rezoning request, ZOA #75-03, by the City of Fridley. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Chairman Harris declared the hearing open at 9:55 P.M. � � Mr. Boardman said the City purchased this property in 1955. When the zoning ordinance was adopted in January, 1956, it was zoned M-2. Our deed was recorded on this property in 1960; at the time of the building permit, and since that time, the building has been sold, and it was no longer a public use. The property then reverted back to M-2 zoning, however, there was a commercial establishment on this property, and it should have been rezoned to the proper zoning at the time it was sald. Mr. Harris said there was an addition put on this building at the time of purchase by private ownership. Mr. Boardman said that 'George Is In Fridley` wanted to do some remodeling of that portion of the building that used to be the Fridley liquor store, and in order to do this, the property had to be rezoned. Mr. Lindblad asked why they couldn't have liquor establishments in M-1 and M-2 zoning? Mr. Boardman said the zoning code would have to be changed to allow such a use. , , � � �'1 ... .. . .. ._ . . . . .._ , Planning Commission Meeting May 7, 1975 � Pa4e 7 Mr. Drigans asked what the zon.ing was said it was all M-2 and it was oarned by the would be spot rezoning. on the surrounding property. Mr. Boardman Metro.Sewer Board. Mr. Drigans said this . Mr. Langenfeld said he thought this operation would need a Special Use Permit for a recreational facility. Mr. Boardman said this request had nothing to do with anything that the owner might need to develop this property, and any requests needed to develop this property would have to come from the owner. This rezoning request was just to get this property into the proper zoning for the existing use. Mr. Langenfeld said he sees the sign for a game room everytime he goes by this operation. Mr. Boardman said that under C-2 zoning, under accessory uses, it daes allow recreational facilities which are open to the public. Their main business would be liquor, so a recreational facility would be an accessory use. Mr. Drigans said that if it wasn't that the Metropoliian Sewer Board owned the property around this operation, he would be re'uctant to favor spot rezoning. . Mr. Boardman said the effects of having a commercial enterprise in this area was perhaps not all that great, because this was surrounded by a public area. t MOTION by Lindblad, seconded by Drigans, that the Planning Commission close the Public Hearing on the rezoning request, ZOA #75-03, by the City of Fridley. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairman Harris declared the hearing closed at 10:20 P.M. � MOTION by Drigans, seconded by Harris, that the Planning Commission recommend � to Counc.il approval of the request for rezoning, ZOA #75-03, by the City of Fridley, to.rezone from M-2 (heavy industrial areas) to C-2 (general business areas), a previous- ly public owned parcel, that part of Lot 38, Auditor's Subdivision No. 39, so this .property will be zoned to conform with the present use, �he same being 3720 East Riuer Road N.E. Mr. Harris said he hoped the Council understood that this was spot rezonin�. UPON A VOICE VOTE, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 4. REQUEST FOR TREE REMOVAL: ISLANDS OF PEACE Mr. Harris said it was his understanding that the Rarks & Recreation Commission had not acted on this request as yet due to an oversight at their last meeting. Mr. Boardman said there were two ways the Planning Commission could handle this. They could table the request until after the Parks and Recreation Commission had made a recommendation, or review the request at this time, and suggest denial or approval, subject to the Parks & Recreation Commission recommendation. Mr. Boardman said these were not diseased trees, but in order to get a bridge in that would meei the handicap requirements, they were going to have to do some regrading in the area. They wouldn't know how many trees they would have to remove until actual constructionstarted. They were asking for removal of a maximum of ten trees, but they hope it will be much less than that, and would make an effort to save ^� all the trees. It was just in case they have to remo�re some trees, they want to have � prior approval, so that construction wouldn't have to be held up, once it starts. Mr. Boardman said the City does have a regrading plan, but it doesn't show .{,� . � Page g Plann�ng Commission Meeting May 7, 1975 which trees might have to be removed, because this was a heavily woaded area, and it would be impossible to draw in the trees. � Mr. Lindblad said that if they had to remove trees to provide a ramp for the handicapped, then they will have to remove the trees. Mr. Boardman said they were only asking for approval to remove a maximum of ten trees. ; MOTION by Lindblad, seconded by Drigans, that the Plannning Commission recommend approval of the request for the removal of a maximum of 10 trees on the Islands of Peace, to a11c�w construction of a ramp for the handicapped, subject to the recommendation� of the Parks & Recreation Commission. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. i f 5. PLANNING COMMISSIOV REORGANIZATION STRUCTURE Mr. Boardman asked the PlanningWe�e unde�linedlooHeasaEdhthat whennheSwentthat all the changes they had recommended through the ordinance, he tried to see that ev.:rthing was consistent. Mr. Boardman said there were some major changes in the Parks & Recreation Com- mission. He said the paragraph on Powers was removed, and the City Attorney said that paragraph was illegal, so it was just as well it was out. Mr. Boardman said we added 'Purpose' to the Planning Commission, Parks.& Recreation Commission, and the Appeals Commission. He said the Environmental Quality � Commissian already had this section, and it was included for the new Commissions. The /'� only other thing that had been changed considerablY was that we added 'Organization' to all Commissions. Mr. Boardman said the other things that were underlined are either changes in titles or in the number system or clarification of existing paragraphs. Mr. Langenfeld said the Environmental Quaiity Commission minutes hadn't been completed yet, but they had made two recommendations. He said one of the stipulations had been met in that all the Commissions follow the same form, and the other stipulation was that it should be mandatory that each ward be represented on each Commission. Mr. Boardman said that the Council follows that as much as possible now, and we - did state that an attempt be made to have representation from each ward. Mr. Drigans said it was not always possible to find someone in each ward who was willing to serve. He felt that at the Commission level, it was important that each member consider what was best for the entire City, and that it was less significant than which ward they came from. He said that it was important that the persons appointed to Commissions have a willingness to serve, the capability to serve, and the time to serve. Ne felt it was more desirable to find well qualified individuais and as they were all volunteers, it was more important to find people who w�uld serve the entire City. Mr. Langenfeld�said that at this meeting tie did stress that the qualifications were important. Mr. Boardman said he was anxious to havSQthesthouahtethesetchangeslwould�makel agenda, the date of the Pu�lic Hearing, becau 9 ,�'\ � it a much better ordinance. � Mr. Drigans asked what changes had been made.inthe Park & Recreation Commission? Mr. Boardman said that on page 3 of the first ordinance that starts out,'under Scope, 2nd paragraph, "The Parks and Recreation shall advisle the City Manager and City Planning Commission Meeting May 7, 1975 . Pa�e 9 ! � � ' � Council..........., that has all been found illegal by the City Attorney, and it i � was sugges�ted that this be removed. Also under the old ordinance there was a ;, Section 101.04 Power. This section has been changed to read 'Organization". Every �; thing that was under Power, has been changed to fit Organization. �i Mr. Drigans said what happened to the thing about the land, the budget, ar,d what happens to gifts and what have you, was this only to Council? Mr. Boardman �,. said this was only for Council, because the Parks & Recreation Commission does ;; nat have the legal authority to do this. Mr. Boardman said the only difference between the other Commissions, and the Parks & Recreation Commission was under Funds and Annual Report and Program. Mr. Drigans said that in the second paragraph under Scope in the amended ordinance (Exhibi�t B) it says, "The Parks and Recreation Commission shall advise the City Council, upon a policy review by the Planning Commission, in � the development of programs.......Mr. Drigans said it seemed to him that in the matters ` relating to the recreational programs, that the Planning Commission should review those in terms of policy review, to see if those are the programs in long range � community planning, that�meet the goals of our recreational activitiesu Mr. Boardman said this was what that paragraph said. He said the entire paragraph reads, "The Parks and Recreation Commission shall advise the City Council, upon a policy review by the Planning Commission, in the development of programs to give increased effective- ness and direction in implernenting established City goals, policies and framework, and recommend actions as needed to provide park and recreational opportunities." Mr. Boardman said �Nhat this was saying was that anything the Parks & Recreation , Commission sets up in implementing goals and recommendations, has to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Mr. Drigans said that under Reports, it states that in n matters relating to the recreation program, it wili go directly to Council. He felt • this was a conflict. Mr. Boardman said that was his mistake. He then questioned . whether this should be taken out altogether, since it was being covered under Scope. Mr. Drigans said he felt the Human Resaurces Commission was the weakest part of the reorganization. Mr. Boardman said this would be handled in the goals and objectives. He said that everything that would be done would have a human element to it. If you set up a goa l in trans portaion, that had a human aspect to it. How was the goal that would be set up on transportion going to affect the elderly? Would the transportation system developed allow them to have full use of the Metropolitan . area? He said he felt the City needed that Gommission in order to provide the impetus as far as the human element in our community. Mr. Boardman said he thought Mr. Drigans had made a good paint on the Report portion of the Parks & Recreation Commission. Mr. Boardman said he knew the Planning Commission didn't want to get involved with the budgetary process, but the concern of the Planning Commission was that what they were providing through the recreation budget fits into the goals and objectives of the Community. Mr. Drigans said that maybe the Parks & Recreation were spending too much money on one group and not enough on another, when it comes to recreational activities. This would not be meeting the broad recreational goals of the community. Mr. Boardman said this would not necessarily � show up in budgetary reports but in the capital improvement program. Mr. � Dri.g an s' said the Planning Commission wouldn't see that. Mr. Boardman said they would see the capital improvement program. Mr. Harris said this wouldn't tell us if they were spending $100,000 on softball and $5.80 on the hockey program. Mr. �"� • Boardman said he didn't think they would want to get involved in'�.the budget, and x what should be�'eviewed by the Planning Commission are the recreational programs, capitol improvements and their facilities. �—. �� Planning Commission Meeting - May 7, 1975 � Page 10 Mr. Drigans said that the Planning Commission would like to know the money being spent on various programs, not to give approval or disapproval of the money ''1 being spent, but just to use it for a yardstick to weigh against other recreational programs. Mr. Boardman said what the Planning Commission wanted to know was what recreational programs were being provided, and what facilities were being used for these programs. Mr. Drigans said they would want to determine if the amount spent on any program was justified by the participation of the residents of Fridley, or are tax dollars going for facilities for people who live outside the community. Mr. Drigans said they just want to review the budget in terms of participation. Mr. Boardman said they could leave Annual Reports out of the Parks & Recreation Commission and change Report to read the same as the Environmental Quality Commissi,on. MOTION by Drigans, seconded by Lindblad, that the PZanning Commission recommend to Council Exhibit B, as amended, and with the changes made in Exhibit B as discussed at this meeting. Upon a voi.ce vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Note: Exhibit B as presented to the Council for their May 12, 1975 Agenda included a11 the changes mentioned in the motion. 6. RECEIVE BIKEWAY PROPOSAL MOTION by Drigans, seconded by LindbZad, that the PZanning Commission receive the Bikeway Proposa� and have it put on their May 2�, 1975 agenda for discussion. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting a�e, the motion carried unanimously. � 7. SET INFORMAL HEARING ON UACATION REQUEST, SAV #75-03, BY MACHINING, INC.: To vacate the alley bet�een Ashton Avenue and the railroad tracks in Block 5, _ Spring Brook Park Addition. MOTION by Lindblad, seconded by Drigans, that the PZanning Commission hold an informaZ hearing on a request for a vacation, SAV #75-03, by Machining, Inc., on Ma� 21, 1975, and that a11 affected property owners be natified of this hearing. Upon a voice vote, aZI voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 8. SET DATE FOR WORKSHOP MEETING Mr. 6oardman said that the Planning Commission usually had their workshop meeting the same night as the Public Hearing meeting of the Council. Thi� would be May 12th. The Council will be having the Public Hearing on the Planning Commission reorganization on that date, and he thought as many members as possible from the Planning Commission should be at the Public Nearing. Mr. Harris said he agreed, and urged as many members as possible to come to this meeting. He said the workshop meeting could be changed to Wednesday, May 14th. Mr. Harris declared that the workshop meeting of the Planning Commission be held on the 14th of May at 7:30 P.M. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Lindblad, seconded by Drigans,-that the meeting be adjonrned. Upon a /1 • voice vote, aI1 voting-aye, Chairman Harris declared the Planning Commission meeting of May 7, 1975 adjourned at 11:22 P.M. • Res ctively submi ted, Gz�� oro � y v on, ecre ��`y— ��, MIN(lTES OF TF� REGUTAR PARKS AND REC�EI�TION CO�IISSION N1E�TING APRIL 28, 1975 �1 Meeting was called to order to 7:30 p.m. by Vice Chairnnan Peterson. r,,.�r�ERS pRESENT; Caldwell, Harris, Peterson, Wagar �RS pRESENT: Juan�Salas, 5810 5th St.,N.E., 571-6750 - Soccex � Juan Salas Jr., 5810 5th St., N.E., 571-6750 - Soccer Luis Salas, 5810 5th St., N.E., 571-6750 - Soccex' Nick Scarcella, 6051 5th St., N.E., 571-4342 - Saccer gean Iambert, 5965 4tYi St., N.E., 571-2374 - Soccer' p,r�dy I,ambert, 5965 4th St., N.E., 571-2374 - Soccer Dale Arider'son, 5910 4th St., N.E., 571-9591 - Soccer R. J. Hughes, 548 Rice Creek, I,INO LAKES PARK Mr. Bob Hughes was present t�o discuss the Lino Lakes project. He said they � had agreed with the towns up there (Centerville-Lino Lakes) that they would retain at least 80% of it as wilderness or undevelopecl area• He said there w�uld be hiki.ng trails, open areas, ^tc., but no development of other sorts. He said that the other 20� wr�uld be available for �use as a]mr�st anythir�g. He mentioned that there was a snall golf caurse in there now. He said there had been talk of developing it into scsne other facilities, for instance, boating, fishi.ng docks, day camping, over- night camping, etc. He went on to say that he felt one of the reasons Fridley was interested in this area was because the watershed up there is basically the beginninq of Rice Creek, and that it flows down through Fridley to the Mississippi. He said � that it passes through Ramsey County and tw� parts of Anoka County. He said that both of these counties have moved in the directic�n of improving the streambed and � protecting it frcan develo�nent to a certain extent, ancl that Fridley had moved in . that direction also. . Mr. Hughes felt one of the things which was important in deciding what was to be done with the I�.no Lakes Park, was ta find out what Fridley is daing here and what the desires of the Fridley City govexrnnent citizens are, related to that ax'ea up there. He went on to say tha� he was here to tell th�n this was in operation arid the desire was to ha�e a coordinated effort,and to answer any questions as best he could. He wanted to ask them what the plans of Fridley as a City are, as well as the Goa�missionexs relative to Rice Creek and the area around it, and what wauld they most like to see in the Lino Lakes Park that would ccxnplement the programs and facilities that they are planning here. Mr. Brown stated that the City of Fridley has plans for leaving the Creek it- self in a"natural" state arxl development there would be sane type of' trail and maybe scane additional briclges. He said they had a bridge or two that they had already put over it. � Mr. Bro�an mentioned that we now have a new m�nber of the city staff, Dr. Dan Huff, our Naturalist/Resource Goordinator, wha would also be interested in Mr. Hughes�inforn�ation. He said that the reason Dr. Huff wasn't at the meeti.ng was because he was leading a group in the park. � Mr. Hughes asked the Cc�anission if they had given sane thought to the relation- - ship between the City's �aarks and any adjacent parks, either in Ramsey County or ^ further upstream in Anoka County. Mr. Harris replied that they hadn't, fran a specific standpoint but frcan a utilization starrapoint obviously, since they are available to us as taxpayer's of �Anoka County and if there were programs developed to utilize th�n, he didn't see any reason why they shouldn't encourage their use. He felt the Lino Lakes area Minutes of the Parks & Recreation Co�►mission Meeting April 28, 1975 Page 2 should be left in as natural state as possi.ble. � Mr. Hughes said that in buying the lar�d the County did agree ar�d this agre�nent . is in writing, that they w�uld not develop more than 80g of the lar�l. He said that their plan at this point is to develop much less actually. Mr. Harris mentioned the fact that people are going to have to drive to the park arxi tYierefore some public facilities are going to be necessary up there. Mr. Hughes concurred but said the plans are more long range and their target date to have the preliminary plans together and presented as a recca�anendation was a year frcxn last February. He said they would rather proceed slowly and with a certain am�unt of coordination. Mr. Peterson suggested that they put this subject on their July agenda and in the meantime they can ask for staff reccx�unendations and ask Dr. Huff for his reca�nendations. He invited Mr. Hughes to come back again in July when the Cca�unis- sion can give him their input. Mr. Brown asked Mr. Hughes to send him a copy of his group's minutes which he turn would give to the Ccxranission menbexs. He also mentioned that we �uld sex�d him our minutes as they relate to his praject. SOCC�R Mr. Juan Salas was present to continue his discussion regarding obta�ning t�ao soccer fields in Fridley. ^ ' Mr. Wagar asked Mr. Brown if he had heard fran the schoal. Mr. Brown replied � that he had talked to Mr. Hedren who referred hun to Messrs. Larson and Leslie. Mr. Brown explained that he had invited th�n to tonight's meeting, hawever, he hadn't heard frcxnn th�n and they obviously weren't at the meet�ng. Mr. Brown suggested that Mr. Salas use Madsen Park as it was no longer being scheduled for many softball games. He also mention�l that Locke would be available. Mr. Salas stated that they need son� portable goalposts. Mr. Brown replied that if Mr. Salas would supply the specifications and drawings, the Parks Depart- ment woould build the portable goalposts. . MOTION by Narris, seconded by Caldwell, to a11ow Juan Sa1as the use of Locke Pa.�k and Madsen Park for his soccer program. The motion carried. Mr. Salas asked when he could start playing in the parks. Mr. Brown replied that he could go into the parks ir.Bnccli.ately, however, he wr�uld have to advise Mr. Salas the days at which time he could not be at Madsen, due to the softball games. Mr. Salas stated that their games wauld be on Saturdays, at which time Madsen is - always available. Mr. Brown mentioned that there is another field which is quite flat, namely Ruth Circle, and that Mr. Salas might want to take a look at it. Mr.�Salas asked Mr. Brawn if the Parks Departinent had any soccer balls. Mr. ,r'1 Brawn replied that it didn't. Mr. Salas stated that his club was selling soccex ,` balls for $13.00 and wauld be glad to sell them to Mr. Brawn. 12 � . �3 Minutes of the Parks & Recreation Camnission Meeting April 28, 1975 Page 3 Mr. Wagar asked Mr. Peterson to get this soccer problem on the agenda on the ,� next District #14 meeting arr3 f�.r�d out why they won't cooperate with Mr. Salas in letting him use their school facilities. Mr. Peterson said he had tried this several times. He said that one of the problems you have with the school is that it is not camninicated to the school board. He cited as an example, tw� years ago, when they wanted to have a basketball program and they said that we couldn't use the gyms so they talked to the school board members as taxpa.yers asking why they couldn't use the gyms, and consequently the last twr� winters they have ha.d, with the cooperation of the Parks and Recreation DepartTnent, a very good basketaball Progr'am • DOG OBIDIENC� . The gentl�nan who had called regarding this situation was not at the meeting so Mr. Brown reported that the gentlemalz felt the City should provide ssoaane type of dog obed.ience, as he felt some dogs do not behave properly when they are with kids, etc. He felt the City should provide dog obedience classes, just as they provide craft classes, etc. Mr. Harris mentioned that we wr�uld then be ccxnpeting witti a nwnber of schools who are already offering this course. � i� ' Mrs. Caldwell asked for a correction to the Minutes of the March meeting regarding her motion on l�rseshoes. The motion was changed to read as follows: � MOTION bz� Caldwell, seconded by Wagar, that the Horseshoe League have permission to match the exisfing facilities at Commons Park. The motion carried. Etren though we originally agreed to let the Horseshoe League match the existing facilities, Mr. Brawn stated �ae are now going ahead and put in the cement walkways arid they are going to provide the clay, irons, and the anchors for the irons. He explained that they thought we were going to put in everything, even th�ugh in our Minutes they simply asked us for permission_to do the �rk th�n- selves. �� M • •�' ' � c '«� T� possibility of changing our poli,cy at the beach and allowing Mr. George Hansan to run our concession stand was discussed. The Cc�n.ission agreed that they wr�uld prefer to leave it as is, so that the Parks and Recreation Department has carplete contral of it. MOTION by Waqar, seconded by Harris, to keep the beach concession as is. The motion carried. The Cce�mission asked Mr. Brown to advise Mr. Hanson when he called, that the City is researching the possibility of enlarging their own facility and do not wish to make a change at this time. The Conanission did, however, stipulate that they w�uld be open in the future to a concrete proposal frcan anyone, i.ncluding Mr. Hanson or.a service organization looking to make money. They asked Mr. Brown to look into � the possi.biiity of enlarging our facility in 1976 and report back. Mr. Bra�m mentioned that they had considered the p�ssibility of buying a small freezer and had $400 in the budget, however, they were $600 or $?00. Mr. Harris said that he could get a chest type for the Departrn�nt.- Mr. Peterson said that the Football Association had bought a snall one which Mr. Brown mYght want to take a look at, to see if one like it w�uld fit our needs.. '� �'! M,j,r�utes of the Parks & Recreation Cca�mission M�eeting Apri.l 28, 1975 Page 4 Mr. Harris said that due to the Fiscal Disparities Bill, which is the sharing � of revenue, scgne of the land that we contingent to our parks is not quite as finan- cially interesting to the c�znity as it was before the bill. The reason for this is because you retai.n 60� and give back 40�. He suggested that the Ccmmission give sane preliminary thought to acquiring that portion of property between Hart Cartex' and the west edge of our service drive in Locke Park. This land is east of Carter Day but west of our drive into Locke Park. He asked Mr. Bresvm to check into it and find out how much acreage is involved. CONIN3.ISSION CHAIRMI�N Mr. Brown remind�3 the Commission of the resignation of Mr. Don Blair as chair- man of the Cca�mission and asked if they had given any thaught to a replacement. He said Mr. Blair had dropped the Planning Ccx�a�ission and therefore was no longer on the Parks arid Recreation Ca�ani.ssion, as whcgnever is appointed to the Planning Conr mission is autcunatically Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Comnission. There was sane discussion as to whether this was correet. Some of the Ca�.issioners we.r� under the impression that it was the other way around. They asked that a copy of the planning Cca�nission Ordinance be sent to them to study. � � • - i i�+ MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 9:30 p.m. The next regular meeting will �e held on Monday, May 19, 1975 at 7:30 p.m., in the ^ Cc�enunity R�► of Fridley Civic Center. • Respectfully su�ainitted, / � L�2 �� /��>t�,' �' �__._- _- . J�y Wyat , Secre�y to the Cca�nission � ^ n !'\ � � '15 ENV�RONMENTA,L QU�LI:TX' COTZrITSSION MEETTNG APRIL 29, 1975 MEMBERS PRESENT: Russell Houck, LeRoy Oquist, Jim Langenfeld, LeeAnn Sporre, Thomas Sullivan MEMBERS ABSENT : OTHERS PRESENT : Bob Erickson, Mary Martin Jerry Boardman Chairman Langenfeld opened the meeting at 7:40 P.M. Mr. Langenfeld commented that he certainly appreciated the efforts of Arlene Smith, the secretary for the last meeting, in getting the minutes out so quickly. A short discussion involving the minutes of the last meeting was held. It was decided that No. 3 of the changes suggested by committee members be stricken. (Al1 members serve three year appointments starting and ending on the same date.) MOTION BY LEROY OQUIST TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES OF APRIL 29, 1975 WITH CORRECTION. Seconded by Thomas Sullivan. Upon a voice vote, the motion carried unanimously. A lengthy discussion on Model Environmental Code followed. Mr. Langenfeld read some of John Melinka's comments on the booklet, Proposed Legislation and Rules and Regulations. The first 25 pages need not be read, because this did not pass before the legislature. They were reviewed as far as the Environmental Plan- ning System. In regard�to the second section on rules and regulations, the state presently has the power to decentralize and set up rules and regulations for that decentralization. Jerry Boardman commented that if the legislation did not pass, then Chapter 13 is no longer legal. Ms. Sporre added that sin.ce the state people were not present at the meeting, many of the FEQC's questions could not be answered. They wQUld have to have data. Jerry Boardman said that he would meet with the state people this week. They will be invited to the next FEQC meeting for the purpose of a general discussion on the Model Environmental Code. Mr. Boardman said that at the present, the FEQC has the power to decentralize as long as that decentralization accomplishes the enforcemen�t of the Minnesota Environmental Protection Act. Ms. Sporre asked whether the EQC could exempt anyone from this system. Mr. Boardman said that'they could have exempted the City under Chapter 13 with the development of an approved environmental plan. However, the legislation which would have allowed Chapter 13 was not approved, and therefore, the exemption no longer exists. �� ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING, APRTL 29, 1975 16 PAGE 2 ^ Mr. Langenfeld referred to the Preliminary Guideline for Prepara- tions of an Env�ironmental Assessment. Mr. Boardman commented that this should only be considered if one is going to prepare an environ�ental impact statement. Jerry Boardman explained two things which the City could do in regard to decentrallzation. 1. Decentralize according to rules and regulations set up on a project by project basis as laid out in Chapters 11, 12, and 14. . 2. Set up an environmental systems plan for the City. However, we would still be required to decentralize according to Chapters 11, 12, and 14 without the exeFiption of an approved environmental systems plan. A discussion involving the existing and proposed organizational structure of the comm.ittees followed. LeRoy Oquist asked whether the FEQC would have the responsibility for ideas which are not environmentally significant. Jerry Boardman answered that the detailed roll of the Environmental Commission has not fully been fully determined. ^ � Mr. Boardman added that the Planning Commission has reviewed this � proposed structure, and they felt that it must be written in a � more organized way. The City Council caill be holding a public hearing on this on May 12. The Council will be receiving the Planning Commission's recommendations. In reference to the proposed system, Mr. Boardman also said that when an issue is brought to the member commission, the chairman does not go advised or delegated. Everything is reviewed by the Planning Commission. However, minutes are forwarded directly to City Council. If the Planning Commission feels that a mot'ion is not consistent with the city policy,they can recommend that it go back to the particular commission for reconsid'eration. The Planning Commission cannot change another commission�s decision.. They will have no more power than the member commissions. The Planning Commission wil.l be involved with policy development. The main funetion of the member commissions will be policy imple- mentation review. They will act as input sources to the Planning Commission and City Council, . The problem By the time gone to the now is that everything goes directly to the Council. the Planning Commiss.ion reviews it, it has already Counci.l. .�..' . �� ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSTON MEETING, APRIL 29, 1975 PAGE 3 �, The Planning Commission will act as a funnel of information so that matters will be presented to the Council as a collection of material. In this way, the City Council will have all of the information at one time in order for them to make their decisions. r"� MOTION BY RUSSELL HOUCK THAT THE FEQC ACCEPT THE NEW ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE IN CONCEPT WITH THE TWO STIPULATIONS STATED BELOW: 1. 2. THAT ALL ORDINA�IGES FOR EACH COMMISSION FOLLOW THE SAME FORM AND THAT THE FORM BE CONSISTENT WITHIN ITSELF. WARD �EPRESENTATION ON EACH COMMISSION. THERE MUST BE ONE MEMBER�FROM EACH WARD ON EACH COMMISSION AT ALL TIMES. Seconded by LeRoy Oquist. Upon a voice vote, the motian carried unanimously. A short discussion on the review of the final draft followed. MOTION BY THOMAS SULLIVAN THAT THE FINAL DRAFT BE RETURNED TO THE FEQC FOR FINAL APPROVAL PRIOR TO COUNCIL APPROVAL. Seconded by LeeAnn Sporre. Upon a voice vate, the motion carried unanimously. Ms. Sporre spoke of decisions involving the watershed district. MOTION BY LEEANN SPORRE THAT THE �'EQC SEEK COOPERATION FROM ITS ADJACENT COMMUNITIES, ESPECIALLY BLAINE, COON RAPIDS, AND SPRING LAKE PARK, ON THE SPRINGBROOK WATERSHED DISTRICT; THAT FOR ANY DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL WITHIN THE WATERSHED DISTRICT THE CITY BE GIVEN NOTIFICATION AND TIME FOR REVIEW BY THE FRIDLEY COUNCIL AND THE FIRDLEY ADMINISTRATIQN. Seconded by LeRoy Oquist. Upon a voice vote, the motion carried unanimously. MOTION BE LEEANN SPORRE THAT THE FEQC RECOMMEND TO STAFF AND COUNCIL THAT A WATER MONITORING PROGR�IM BE INITIATED AT THE ENTRANCES TO FRIDLEY ON SPRINGBROOK CREED. (WATER QUALITY TESTS) � Seconded by Thonias Sullivan. Upon a voice vote, the motion carried unanimously. MOTION BY THOMAS SULLIVAN TO ADJOURN TNE MEETING AT 10:45 P.M. Seconded by Russell Houck. Upon a voice vote, the motion carried , unanimous�:y. � Respectfully submitted, _ y_�_ . �. -, � � , ��11.�.lt_l - �'�,i' � � Holly Tonsager, Recording Secretary _ . � _. � CITY OF FR�DLEY PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS- STREETS & UTILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING CALL TO ORDER: MAY 13, 1975 Acting Chairman French called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL: PAGE 1 Members Present: French, Forster, Christensen Members Absent: Meissner Others Present:� Darrel Clark, Gommunity Development Administrator r:�[ : • APPROVE PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS-STREETS & UTILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: JANUARY 15 MOTION by Christensen, seconded by Forster, that tlie P1ats & Subdivisions- . Streets & Utilities Subcommittee minutes of thE meeting of January 15, 1975 be approved as written. Upon a voice vote, a11 votinq aye, the motion carried unanimously. 1. CONSIDERATION OF A VACATION REQUEST, SAV #75-02, BY LOREN SMERUD: Vacate 46th Avenue N.E. between 3rd Street and University Avenue N.E., TO �1.1.4w the construction of a 24 ft. x 24 ft. addition. Mr. & Mrs. Loren Smerud and Mr. John Archer were all present. � Mr. Clark said that both Mr. Smerud and Mr. Archer who share in this vacation are present at this meeting. He said the M'r. Smerud's addition would bring the structure within 8 to 10 feet of the existing right of way. When Mr. Smerud inquired about a building permit for this addition, he was told he had two options. One was .to ask for a variance and the other was to petition for a vacation of 46th Avenue. Mr. Smerud felt that as long as he had been maintaining this property anyhow, he might just as well ask for the vaction and then he wouldn't need a variance because he would have plenty of side yard clearance with the vacation. Mr. Clark said that as far as staff recommendation on this, we do have a storm sewer located 10 feet South of the existing center line of 46th Avenue. This would be on the portion that Mr. Archer would get from this vaeation. He said the descrip- tion of this easement would be the Northerly ZO�feet of the Southerly 30 feet of the vacated street, ar if you want to say the Northerly 20 feet of the Southerly half of the vacated street, this would be the same thing. The other easement that should be retained was the extension of the existing alley. He said he thought there were power lines in this alley. Mr. French said this would just be a utility easement. Mr. Clark said that outside of these two easements, the staff had no objection to this vacation being granted. Mr. Smerud said that if this request was granted, he thought they could do more with the property, as they were maintaining it now, but they would feel more at ease if the property was theirs. ^ Mr. Archer said he was in favor of the vacation. He said he was also maintaining �this property and using it, so it would be better if it belonged to him. He said when he moved into this area, the street right of way was a deep.gully. He said they were able to get the City to grade and bring in fill. Mr. Clark said he would be able to use 10 feet of the vacated street and the 20 foot easement could be used ' . .,..�.. . � Pda�ks & Subs -Str & Util Sub. Meetinq - MaY 13, 1975 Paqe 2 �� as the required sideyard setback. Mr. Chrisensen asked how much money the property owners had spend in maintaining this property? He said _he knew they had put in a lot of time, because this property � looked so nice. Mr. Archer said just fertilizer, water and some lilac bushes. Mr. Smerud said that in regard to the alley, she thought the alley was-on the west side of the fence for the highway. Mr. Clark said it was. She said the children in the area climb the fence. Mr. Clark said there wasn't any access to the highway for 5 blocks. There was an access at 44th and 49th Avenues. Mr. Clark said they might want to designate a pedestrian crossing at some time, but it would probably be at 47th as this was already a blacktopped area. Mr. Clark said tfiat this vacated street would be added to the property they already own, but he didn't think it would make too much difference in their taxes unless there was new curbing or street improvements that were charged by the front footage of property. Mr. Christensen and Mr. French both mentioned the appearance of the street right of way. They said it looked like a sodded lot, and said the two property owners should be commended. � � MOTION by Christensen, seconded by Forster, that the P1ats & Subdivisions-Streets & Uti.Zities Subcommittee recommend to the Planninq Commission approval of the request for a Y�ca�ion,,.SAV #75-02, by Loren Smerud, to vacate 46th Avenue N.E._between 3rd Street and University Avenue N.E., to a11ow the construction of a 24 ft. x 24 ft. addition to a residence at 4603 3rd Street N.E. with the follov��ing stipulations: . 1. Retain t.he s�orm sewer easement over .the Norther.Zy 20 feet of the South ^ half of �6th Avenue N.E. being vacated. 2. Retain a 12 foot utility easement in the extension of the a11ey between Blocks 9 and 16, Plymou th Addition. UPON a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motian carried unanimously. 2. CONSIDERATION OF R VACATION REQUEST: SAV ,#75-03, MACHINING, INC.: Vacate tiie all�y in Block 5, Spring Brook Park Addition, that lies between Ashton Avenue N.E. and the railroad tracks, to allow for an addition that will join two existing buildings at 140 Liberty Street N.E. Mr. & Mrs. Frank Schaul, co-owner of Machining, Inc., were present. Mr. Clark said that alley was not being driven on,�so it didn't have to be retained as an alley. We did send notices to all the property owners in Block 5, Spring Brook Park Addit�ion, and none of the neighbors are present to object. Mr. Fench said it seemed to him that they were all using the alley as part of their yard or for a garden, when he checked the area. Mr. Clark said there were utility easement in this a11ey. He said that he knew N.S.P. was using this easement, and probably the telephone company and cable T.V. He said that notices had been sent to the utility companies, and we have already heard from N.S.P. that they want the easement retained. When Machining, Inc. join the two ^ buildings together, there will be a power line running over it. Mr. Clark said he �would suggest that the Subcommittee recommend approval of this request, keep the 12 foot utility easement, and as far as the City was concerned, allow the encroachment of the structure into the easement. The petitioner will have to get written permission from the utility companies for this same encroachment and follow the stipulations they Plats & Subs.-Str. & Util. Sub. Meetin - May 13, 1�75 Page 3 �� may ask for such as maintaining proper c]earance below the lines. � Mr. Clark said there was one other thing he wanted to bring up, although it really wasn't the concern of this Subcommittee, it would probably be the concern of the Council and that was that there was an occupancy across the tracks, a junk yard, that has been crossing over the tracks and onto the property of Machining, Inc. for access either to the south to Longfellow Stre�t or to the north to Liberty Street. When this building on Libert Street was built in 1961, there was an agreement drawn up between Mr. Julkowski, who owned the property at that time, and Mr. John Hayes of 136 Liberty Street for access through this property. Neither party signed the agreement, but there was verbal agreement.. The agreement was that Mr. Hayes would have access through this property until the City extended Liberty Street. He said it was a problem to get street right of way across the railroad tracks because it .ha� to go through the Railroad and Warehouse Commission, and this permission was difficult to obtain. Mr. Schaul said they had no intention of block off the access. They would be blocking off the access to Longfellow with this addition, but Mr. Hayes wo�rld still have access to Liberty Street. Mr. Clark said he had talked to the Ciiy Attorney, and he said that although the property owner across the tracks might not like it, he thought that one access would be all that had to be provided. Mr. Forster asked if there was any other access for the property, other than through Machining, Inc. property. Mr. Clark said there was not. Mr. Clark said this really had nothing to do with the alley vacation, but ^ he though Council should be atiaare of this before they authorize a building permit for this property. Mr. Schaul said they had never had a problem with Mr. Hayes. Mr. Clark said he would �suggest that before they start construction on this addition, that they go over and talk to Mr. Hayes and explain what they were going to do. Mr. Schaul said there was only 12 feet between their two buildings right not, and with the addition, these building would be joined, making'it one complex. He said he has occasions when he has to send employees from one building to another, and in the winter this was a problem. When it was all one building, it would make it much more convenient. MOTION by Forster, seconded by Christensen, that the P1ats & Subaivisions-5treets & Utilities Subcommittee recommend to the PZanning Commission appravaZ of the request for a vacatiQn, SAV #75-03, Machining, Inc., to vacate the a11ey from Ashton Avenue to the railroad tracks in Block 5, Spring Brook Park Addition, to a11ow an addition ' to be built to join two existing buildings at l40 Liberty Street N.E. with the following stipulations. . I. Retain the Z2 feet utility easement in the vacated a11ey. 2. City a11ow the eneroachment of the building into the easement. 3. Petitioner get written permission from the utility companies and follow their stipulations for thzs encroachment. , Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously�. Mr. Christensen said his time had expired for serving on this Sabcommittee and Plats & Subs.-Str. & Util. Sub. Meeting - May 13, 1975 Page 4 he had enjoyed it very much. He said it was good experience, but for personal reasons, he wanted to give notice of his resignation from this Subcommittee and � he would not be serving on any�other Commission. � 21 Mr. French said his time had also expired, and he had been on this Subcommittee four years and he really enjoyed it to. He said he knew this Subcommittee was not going to be functioning much longer, and he thought he would like to be on another Commission. Mr. Clark asked both members to continue to serve on this Subcommittee until the reorganization was complete, which would probably be some time in July. Ne said he knew they weren't asked to meet very often, but there may be other business for them to take care of before that date. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Christensen, seconded by Forster, that the meeting be adjourned. L'pon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Actinq Chairman French declared the Plats &�Subdivisions- Sfreets & Utilities Subcommittee Meeting of May 13, 1975 adjourned at 8:30 �'.M. 1 Respectfully submitted, , n G�� ` ��-�� Dorothy Ev son, Secretary ^, ..�.-, .,� � �2 f3UILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBC0��IITTEE AIEETING OF MAY 14, 1975 ^ Chairman Lindblad called the meeting to order at 7:55�P.M. P4EP9BERS PRESENT: Lindblad, Simoneau; Tonco, Seeger OTHERS PRESENT: Jerry Boardman, Planning Assistant , MOTION, by Tonco, seconded by Seeger, to approve the minutes of the April 10, 1975 meeting as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 1. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR [�1 ADDITION TO THE SERVICE GARAGLi LOCATED AT 6359 lii�IIVuRSITY AVENU� iv,E., FRIllI��Y, �1INN. (R�QUES1' t3Y UR. RYAN'S AU't'ODIOTIVE CLIi1IC. 6389 UNIV�RSITY AVE. N.E. ;Y, b11NiJ�5U't'A. 1'1r. Tom Ryan was present for the request. tAr. Ryan showed on tlie plans the proposed curbing. The curbing will be 13 feet from the property line on University Avenue, Service Road and 10 feet £rom the property line on 64th Avenue �.E. Mr. Ryan stated he would like to put in portable curbing. ^ b1r. Lindblad stated the Board would only recarrunend poured cancrete curbing. Mr. Ryan said he would like to use berming along 64th Avenue. Mr. Boardman stated it is important that if berming is put in that they try to keep out of the boulevard. . AIr. Ryan stated the new addition to his existing garage would be a white block building containing t�vo stalls. He stated he would like to begin construction this summer. I�1r. Lindbald asked if there would be any visual roof equipment. l�ir. Ryan stated there wotald not. b1r. Lindblad stated he would like to see the entire area (marked on plans) on 64th Avenue N.E. sodded. btr. Tonco stated he would like to put a bond on the completion of the landscaping. The other members were in complete agreement. MOTION, by S�eger, seconded by Simoneau, to recornmend approval of the request with tlie following stipulations. 1. Screened in refuse area.' 2. Additional green area for landscaping (as shown on the plans). � � 3. Landscaping must be completed by August 31, 1975. '� . 4. $500.00 performance bond set on the completion of the landscaping. UPON A VOICE VOTE, all vuting aye, the motion carried unanimously. BUILDING STANUARllS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOr�tITTEE MEETING OP rtAY 14, 1975 Pg. 2 � Chairman Lindblad adjourned the meeting at 8:30 P.M. • �� 1 ' Respectfully submitted, ��rYZ� Arlene L. Smith Secretary . ,t . \ ` � 0 �3 CITY Oi' FR1n1.IiY MIhNGSI)'CA P1.11NN1NG AN� ZONING FOlL(�f Nurtai:� SAV #75-02 �r��t.IC��r�s slc;�.�•ivrzr: �c, �Dz -�� .. Loren Smerud) Adiiress Tc2t:phonc Kumbcr � � �� _ � PROI'Jilt'i'1' 01Cti�:R'S SIGNA'f'URL'• K �aa� �s s � L� a � Telephonc Numbcr � � d 7�.5 .� % Strcet Locatiori of Properxy_ I� 1�'� ' `I ' ° � �"'�"` I.eg:il llcscription of 1'roperty. TYPE OF RCQUCST Rezoning � �� Special Use Pcrmit Appr�val of Premin- inary $ Pinal Plat. X Strcets or Allcy Vacations othcr F�e $40.00 Reccipt No.�%5� Present Z011lllf; CitiSSlflC�1t10T1 �/ Existin� Use af Property ��-��_T�;� �� Acreage of Property Descrit�e briefly L-he proposed zoning classifi_cati�n br typc of- usE: and improvement proposed Vacate 46th Avenue between 3rd Street and ; /,� �9, [%�J - °�f" % � � � _ � i C ,�,�� University Avenue N.E. ��.C�,�u�-,��—'�-�/�. ..� �--��.�U�<-�-'J�L `":C��''n's` � flas thc present a�plicar�t pl-eviously sou�.�}it to rezone, plat, oUtain a lot s�lit or � var.iance or special use permit on the su�ject si.te or part of it'? yes�_�no. '. 1Vhat was requcsted and whcn? The uncler�igncd uncler5tands th1t: (a) a]ist of all residents and o��ners of property ` witl►i.n 3t?0 i�ect (3S0 fcct. i�or rczonin�) mu5r be attached to t:his :lj)rI7C��lOil. ' (b) 'I'his al�plicati.on must lic signrd l�y all o�.mers of the prol�erty, or att explan,ztion ? given ti�h}' this i.s not T.he c;�se. (ci Rcs��onsi.bility for any defect in thc proccedings � rc:.ultin�; f'rom thc i�ailurc to lisi: thc nar:es and acldre�.ses ot al"1 rr.si.clents and ! pi•ol�erty o��ncrs of prol��•rty in quc�tion, nciongs to *i�c u�;c3crsibiie�i. � A sketch of J�ror�sed j�rorerty ancl structure nu.ist be cira<<m ancl attached, sho�aing tho � fullot�iii�;: 1. Nortfi l�irection. 'l. i,or.ation of ��roposed struct'trre ori the lot. ! 3. Uiinc�r�sians of pro}�rrty, ��i•ol�oscd st1•tictin•c�, <rncl f't•ont ancl si.dc Setibacks. e Q. Street Names. S, l.oc:ition .md tise of adjacciit existi.ng buildin�s (►aithin 300 fcet).E 'i'1te iuutcrsigned herchy cicclares th�t all thc facts and repr cntations stated in this applic;�tio�i arc truc an�2 corrcct, `�> �' ,% �-�c.Qh,�rG — J SI G;�A7'URIi .' ' '�� QA'fE � � � (APk'i.1C/l,`7') � Uatc f i 1cJ 1).ttc of licarinfi '� I'lanninfi Commi.s_:ion A��praved (datr.$) qenicd City Co►mci 1 1`.r��rovccl+ (datr.$) DenicJ � .,,�,�.� ,-� � � � uh03 3rd �t. N.E. Fridley, N:inn. April ?C, �G75 City cf �'ri�le;T Pl� nnin� �: Zor�in� City I=all Fridlay, 2�ii::n. � ;u32 Gentl.emen : The �rouerty trat Z�Tp are rer,uestin� yau ta ��c^te is tre cit�r nro��ert�� ;�:ic"� r:!y r_ei�� i�bOx'� h:r. Robert �rcY�er 2nd �:�,yseli h�ve ra�?� �ict 1.T'.t,?;1ri1;^s?' �'O!' P'1.� �'].ti �cay+g� S•r}��°. ;��'i 1T1C�J.��.,.°S CUttlr?� i,'_':° �r� ss, e�rotil::�; srru �;s, �rot��in� � 1:t:ers a._d t��ir_� c�xe cf' t7'].,7;i711.ri� �T'?�S, ��l S�'':'�." �(1lc'�i�r� t'�e �ror��: tj� 1.00%•: f%t LY'<�Ct�.VB bet��ePnJorar tt•-o t�?'orer'ties. T��is?�e hzve C10:1P. on our o?�,�n UTithovt a ccr��l�:�.in� to �: e city for the t�ror:� ?�re �a.ve c�one. Tris pronert�� i,� a,~_e�d �nd street ri�rt—of_��ay ��-ith Hi�h��ay �-7 runnin� 'nehir.d it, sa I��roult? �ss��:;,e t'-_ere ?,�Till r�ever be �. reasor� fo�� str�et tc �o �rrou�:. It ti,:cul� also ��ea.n t?�at t��e � cit;� t�To�.zld be r�ceivir�� t�.xes fcr t�is �»operty rat�:er th�n to � have it v^c�r:t �nd not re ceive any mone„�� .t ��11. By my bei�� b� e to ont�a.in h�lf �"Q ?�rc��rty it t��ould in3'�e it �aossible fci r:;�self to er.lar�e !r�r home t,'11ich I �^:,u �d c�o t'^is SUiC:E'.x'� c^:�,tG�.,._^.n' 2. L�'� X 2�'� cd�.itior.. �'�'lS ?±ti.l�lC�i c�.oQ inci'8a.S2 my pra;erty t:'XP,S to tre City of �'ricl�.y for mcre ir_come t� the city. I fAel ii ;•ou T;�oUld �rUc�:_tP t!�is nrorert,y, it �•.•ould he?n us to ix..�rc;�Te o��r bloc',� �rea to keep t?�.e v�1.ue of a11 our :�ro��rties un � r�d in turn i� l� '_�e �p l��'�' �. C ity of b'ridley � better �1€��e ir� U�ricr_ to 1 ive. Sin rely, � - �1 <�- �� Loren D, Smerud ma. s � , ' , April 26, 7.�'75 . - EE IT U�+L'ER3TOOD TFiAi TU"�' U�IDERSIGTdED HA�iL BE�N IVFORI�`^D � T LAT A R��,UE�T I� B�ING rfADE TC VACtiT� T��E PRGP�RTY AT , . li6t!^ ��7E. R�T'��E4'�' 3rd 3t. A�'D TJNIV-�3ITY t�V�. r'. E., A�?D T� M ��^ � V ` � 3?rc�. St . P� . E. ��TILL BE hD�I'�G 'I'::.tiT i 1. J i'nC _n L 1�T , E�C C`' TC :':?� i-?CI�: ; A�U�t �v �U�� r:D'1;I�IC't: C'I� T:�E �GUi'-: �i�E., � �A':�'�E �� . ;� � ~ � �� -G �� -� ��--�� .� ,� J � �� , �7�. � 1�/-��l�C�r��L�.,.;= L- - � � �t � . � /�• ��o�Yi ��o 4 �tiL. -"�'��// �� ` . 'r.--'" ��G?- l �� ` 0 /"� . �� ADU��33 �s��" .�7 � � � 1. � . �s �0 3�� .� `�� ,��_ � ��-� ..�'� �� yG�s' .3�� /�/° 3� `'�'� N � � � .' 0 �Iryil,� f1 /"A/�4�%'q � �� %' d1' .6J/ �f • � B � A`�d�'�S. 7 �,'� � � ��i✓is %J L r! L�'L�:lL'.tsfJ"is I 0 � � M O � � N � � � ,. N M ' tt' u-, � a � O � w z z . � � w � . o �a w � �- cr, � w s � � 0 z w � Z u! > d � H N a W � z � M � . • . � w F- z w U U � � V t�lr. & Mrs . Robert Archer 4595 3rd Street N.E. Fridley, hSn 55421 Dear Mr. & PSrs. Archer; May 9, 1975 Vacation Request, SHV #�7�-02, Loren Smerud �% This is to notify you that there will be an informal meeiing of the Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & UiiaijiesT��bcmeetingewollMbe heldlin5 at 7:30 P.�i. in the Fridley City N the emplo��ee's lunch room, on the lower level. The Planning Co;nmission tivill also be holding an informal hearing on this request on t�Jednesday, t�ay 2�p 1975 at B:OO P.M. at the same location except tl�at this meeting will.be in the Counc�l Chambers. As you are directly affected by this vacatnan1Teqhattis�not�possible, appreeiate your appearance at these meetings a �eciazed. A a 1 etter stati ng your vi eti�rs on thi s request wou7 d be app � letter should be addressed to the City, to the attention of ihe Planning Department. Thank you GEORGE MEISSNER Vice Chairman plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee RICNARD HARRIS Chairman Planning ConVnission 0 u 0 ,�....�+ w_ �� ; s 4.:� :, , . ,. � ;, � �>• �, , , ��- '��?�q__ ..rf75 � C � � .;t.h- -.�-1h�-- � � U V .. �:�.�� , 4 aTt-1. �d1� � - �� i"� v� �'.,�-iK9 I r�7�f�2- ' �03 , -' . r� �' d 3 :; ; ��,� :� y � ' � �� " "- - - -'; . �.•, ' � _____ : , �. � " nvF. �,�� SAV #75-02 LOREN SMERUD Vacate 46th Avenue between & University Avenue N.E. , DRAWING FROM ENGITYERISEMENTARTMENT �� LOCATION OF UTIL ----- ___ _..__._.. ___w--------� -- -- _ _ __� .___�. �. . ! '., 1 � I � n� ; * � I." � Z - ' __ S • �__..._. �.-��,...s,�_.. — — � ` � � , _.. .-�. -... � .__. ...�. ... __, v SHOWING .....�m...,.. . . . � -- — �. .�. ...__ ...... ...F. . .� .,,� — � ' UT��iry — — - — _ ._ - ._---- _ _ � — ____ S � �9 .: _� fr_ t:: r,� r / L S � -, 3rd St. s, / C,. ��! :, _� _ !- � yi` I � i �' j l-- g ;-; � � - -9 '� �� ` � � i ia > � � , ---- `�-;y -+ i�--'' i --- - _.,. 11.»-'� . � _.. t`y /.r i � - --'---` �-� �..,,�� 1 . ' �¢"'�---' ` � � �� o' t : T 'z-sl.�. � �� - - _--� J.__�"__ i � i{ s ____._ 6 � �� . •.�_'_�/t3�03:� � � � . . � . + � 7 _' z"L- �� S i . ��- --�_-fi.�_,j � � -- I - —r 1 ; --- �-�� i � �- r -, ��l . ^ �•��,, -�,-.� - � •� � ' '[ " �i 'ap `� � - • � i r ` •�l�e S.1�y/�l�t? _ ��1 =,�f J-rh�'��."� )aJ� �'�=�--JfJ' ,2N i'_ 1 . � i � �1 : � !; �7 � 3 � 29 ' -► ��-s-`. _ -'-- i � �P .�^. a. ..7 �.i, ' S . � � 4 �,�t"3'z =� 9 �. `� • . � ,{.�G�.�`iT ,; �� 3,�-'-- ,i''Z�J ° � F�.�:�.:� � ,��;zl_ _y�!�2_N.° -------, i ' i...�. %"i �+'. �� F � �, i�.�' '� t'f�� s-�q __.__Jt .. ' �� '� � � ` _ � . .. _ — � +-.�+..o.:�+�.�.-+�4 - � � ✓-�l ,�., � - 1 �,j r� � � � S ,,� � �� ^ iy ;% � z'� - - - .. -, � , t I;JZO �:�>iJ" - ��.,{'✓ �fijol�� % /: /*....Ml_' . M , - H j� . - � '' -� �i'..---- '— _ �-�d"- yj;+.�7----- - ----�... ; . -- �f�--� - �, t� j ;, � _ <<� . t�t r : �� •? ' - - � ;s I,: , � ;� t ��q_— �� {— , : ;-- ?�- G ��_ � i, � . � �� , __ �-%'.�3�� ' � ` - ; ��i'-. ��oti -- ��;v� ` :��0°� `'�! ia . ,r ' v ' __ �...3 . � i _ . �' • V • � � _es.. s '.'W �f�' �., , .:, •; � ,3 �;,..:; �� ---- - r �.. �,� ,� ., i•. �s „� j ,.� ' . i` � -- .. :.•.. , < .c , : ` . _ ` ^� � 1 I� r � � � �/'+'a qsr,• . d _ __. _ _ ' `_"_.. ' ' - v 1 -. � . . . d NI9-.7//Y. C�i "J � �� ..._.._. -Wf��i la .ri....... ,.• . ...h ��.1�_�.��._ l29 j._. ' " --". �- : f� /.�...r , ��i i .� / J . . .^ � ,� .� ,� �a , � � 1 `� � r _.V��"i. � . `^ . �_ ..�i `F _.�� .. � i ^^•`(�/. �4!4'�"�" ' . � , _H a J�. �� t�,�30 � L��`'�/ c-�Jr,.go� i a`�' 9' f'Y -< I V ��' � �� NS�� ° '3 �'� 3- ' =: � j ` K? ,�5' �;' u . ^ y -�r� -- � - y57�- ; i -�N��S '��: ,� � _ i �7� � � < ;�t-- -�- I �..; �-i F - �` _ - - � f� j ta l ` ^ y� � , • ._ � � ��,J,. ! _ � r� ^ - -`� _. '' _ `� O _ `� (� _ —. rc ' � - -- � �- �. �r Cv� _1.� �� %1 "� �:t � � ,.>� .,o zs � _ _ _ `° , � y55 �i�50- - N t{h �5��,1- . _ ►�5yy � , E�+� --��Yl � - 1�-;° � � � ,.. �1 /, ;,'`n /� ^ � ^ _li_1- n A U� . h : � . �_'�_� ♦'�S.w �/ - �^� � i .. � - v} � � t. ' il' at �� /ro:e! �-- �- ,r c. �3i.e .7 13 8 � ,.;�, 53 • �5'��1•` -N53g `;; �" .'__� ' i � � wt�5.�l3r� N. h �, ,• � M �.,, sz :�� S� � C'� - - —(� -- " --- -*- ,�, - �ire IS- 7 J.: � iin.i! �i\., . 21 �/ � . . 53/__ N��6_ H527 y52i_ �NS37�- � ----- -�-- �N� •. � ; � l�i ^ � � ` 'd � ----��-� � . , (�'j � : .,,,,.,, ♦ .�:•.� ---- �-_:.7o:.E: � - e�.i � ;, ! ,. � N/ kti�y , }JS�S _ - `�5�`�- �4 .- ,_ . _. `:--�--� ,� . �1. ^ . �� — � �� _ . L,. _ �y� �, : � �� . . . �, �s „� . , „ ,:.o_.. ,. . _.. _ . ' . . O �� ' i' �s ( .. n_ C� __4 �, -{,��--� ,�HS.� _�., • �N3 =: ;:. --- �-' q . �./� .; ; � � : .; s, CO ��i 4tG �.r,l !i 4.� .� �r. f� f0 'P°if' i""' �. v r. � � ..'• 1y.f�� r�l.�.��•��-'J � . _____i=} ��Im - � , { :�..r.�.'.�'��\1 f � �_ . ' . -�� ° Ci TY or r- j�1 a�.cY PLATS & SUl3DIVIS10ClS- � ' %.3� �'•h�• S7RCET$ E� UTILI'fIES SUl3C0('i��1ITTEE t•1EETIt�1G -MAY 13, 1975 n . . CALL TO ORDER: ROL� C11LL: . �. .{�pf'R(�VF Pt.l'�TS & SU�DIVIS1011S-STREE7S & UTILITIES SUL'COt��•tITTEE . t�1I �JU TES : Jf`1�+U/'+ft'�' 1 �, 1)7 � . � j. COh�STQERATIO�I OF A�IRCIITIO+d REOUFST, _SAbetti•�eeno3rdaY • � ' LURE(� •Si�IERUU: Vacate �16�,h (�venue ►�l•E. ' �,.. ,.s- �.� � Mn,� Il.;i ,rnrci i�v �vt�niJC� N. E. t0 al l oti•! tilE . . J'vt'C:'wL t.t-• �•� • . �� construction or a 24' x 24' addition. 2, COtiSI DERATI0��1 OF A�: ACAT T ON REQUEST : SAU a 1� e031 nP�9A�� 5 . INC., 140 LIGERTY ST!:L-tT �1.E.. Vacate thz Y � Spring 6rook Park i;ddi ti on ti�a� .l � es bet�reen {�sh�:on Avenue and the railroad tracks, to aliow for an�addition that ��1711 join tt,o exisiing buildings. , � . � /'1 0 f � . , ... . ,� ��, , �� :. . � , . . � . � �f.Mr Darrel Clark .. '`�, Minnesoi.a Gas Company has• no facilities'within the d�v�C `� described areas, and does not object to their vacation. ,f �` , i r � / ' , f � . 7� / � , /� .r--�� ' , �:..�Cr v"�i�L f• wc:�- {" � , � • � Ailliam Schrr�n ' . . �„�'"�'� Re al Estate Section � . � • ."�-�-"''"'�v • . � M�v► � 12., .1975 . .....�. ... . ._ ._......w..--�-.�.-,,..' "' . •. . • .� . . ' �9 0 ,� , � t � �. . , r ..,..� . :.. .�._ ..�. .'. : . ... � . . 4. .._,. . � .. � ... f_.._: t _� �, � Roup;h draft of existing land ; ; , ; � � ! E t ' ;�((( and buildings r � ; ;-� � � � . � . �. ♦ I ._. : ..« L . . .:. . . � i � .. ... � . ... i ... t.....: . � ....a .� ... } �. ± ',, . � . .. _ . . t . ; . ' i .. , . ( . . t , .. .. . � .. . ...i ...� . " ( J. { ; . ' . . . . � . . : � . ; . ' � . . ' � . • y _ %� J� {,/ . � � _ . � ....� j��.�w.. ' . i ....�r , � J�'� r Lw �. . 1 �� /� � � �s � r �� . �. , � . ,.. , . � � : .._± ..�...�_�_..;_ , , +�I f` ,;. , �"� � ` � � . ! � , , , ,, ,� . _,. � 1 .�..._._ ;r ��f . i i ' _ . . W / / � . � � ' . . ... . � � .. j V' �� 4 _ . ` � 3 _ , .. . / - .. � , , : - _`_ j ' `- . ' _ ' i � , , . . , � ` � . , . .�, _ . . ._ .. .._ _ ,,_ � ; : _ f+_.. _ __•. .. . .. . __ � i ; �Q�� . - .. : �� t , � � . ; , 1 i I I� ; ; � �, � �; � �+ .� � �. � o�-�, - �'t'.'`."`.�,.' �`�-�' .� . �-..-- __._ f ' � �' • Loren D. Smerud .�_ - _ 4603 3rd st. N.E. . .: • Fridley . ...... - �., �� 4. . , ��::.� .. . " 't..'. � '" . . F' � i . �� . �� :� �- -� � . . �.._,..� . , '� �. ____ ___ _ _. __, , �,G.�- �.��.- : ; � �� (�'-��-�--��-c.'ti� �� :' �� ' i . . • � ' � ; � � � � � 1 � � � � , � b m . � a �� a sr � ; �' - V , �.�. , .r •>:fl � . � S; : w:,,. ., 3: ,: � _ � � � , _. � �:: '£ r � � j �' � i' � . i . . _. . __.�. . � � . � � - *` `} � _ �: �� . f . : _ � ; ._. , . • ! . , �;� �� _ � . .s-:-� ,i - ?� . ' � � : _.i .. . . . ._�. . � . _ _.. ��.� �� , --�- i .. ' �i { ! ;. • i ') � , � � i _. +._ _ . ,._�'''� : : � r . � � � . � _ i � �`� . ;---__ ,.� / � � (i'+ � "�i- . � �-�_ , - ``_ - � � � ' �31 �..�.. � : . � � , ' � . � . �i . � � _ � � ' i _.�`��;�- �'. � ' � , . � � , + � ' .�� . � _. .. . ,� � �' � � ! } ' " _.�. ; /j _._�- � 1 � ��_ �� . ;_ �, � i �;, I � � , .. .i.. �. ��1 p `` : � ��. : y. ��' � I . � . � � v ^� �. } � z � � ; .. . '� � .. ( . _._ _; Y � cs— ! i �. � - �, . I � , Z � � ; i �4 � Z � � ,v . �: i ' ;�_ � ` � � � � � I � I �,� � i ,� t� .� � i , _ - .....,_..._.. a, _ �' { � -�� - ��•_._� i f I � ��, ..� � .W. �.. _. � .� ;,.,...,_.. r _.. . _ _. ._ _ . � ___. � —. — "" • ° ' .: ' r� i i i � �_. .._._..---___�_ � � , _ . . -I . � • i � � . . � i � � . � � ' � � � r ----- -- j �._ __.�. _ _.. � _ _.. _..... _ � _.... .. . _._._._____�� .Sr � � � r� � b � N F+ � N 3 � td � � 3 .� �� a �x N � � �� > � � t ; . i �. _ � �.�-_ �p . � Sb E ' �4. �; � � ,N�} . 'W . tt1 w . 2y � C _ N � � ; �� .�-' { �d Ds � �, ' - � . A r�, � ' _'.�_ . � � . F1 Mp fa . < .} . � s�a.� �D �`' ; � a �7 � � + � ♦ i � � t �. . � :. t- �., : � ., .: . , � � , , _ ..,,.. r''� " • CXTY OP rl:lUi.L•Y 1�iINNIiSU'1'A . PLAN�IING �hl) ZO;�II�G I�O1Lti9 � Nwnt�cr^�c1�V �" %S- D� /'1 . , � � PPLICAN'f' S S IGNATUI:E �ji'�CN/�✓/N� , �� %Y��k'�`l�t , � �a � A Acldress )4c� �;,� '�;-�.�, >� �i�,� Tcl.cJ�hone Nwnber J�� ;-• �� o ;�'s PROPL'•RTY O{�7}:R'S SIGN��'f.)[tL'• �.:.�r: e�o c1�-�t-'=- Address Telephone Nuraber Street Location of Pro�erty Le�al Description of Pro�erty J' � % c.r ,LE� �� c�.� l' / �C.� -� �.s�..,/ /y�� _ �l , ��.J ^resent Zoning Classi£ication %��I~/ . _ �. Exi:sting Usc of Propexty � � 7r" v _ __ .—,n.,�- TYI'i's Ol� RGQUGS ('.. � . �� Rczonin� 32 � Spccial Usc E Pcrmit Approval of ; Prel.imi�iary i'l.�' Appa'oval of Final 1'lat Strects or. Alley Vacatiotts �' Other ' ' �: . ,.> 5� 71 s` . �1 jj t {�� Pxoposecl Zonin� Classification, S�ecial Use, or other reQuest ��.�_�t„�.��_ . ��-► . . . . . - • � Aescribe brie�ly the Type af Use and Imprave�nent Proposed �� CL�.��c,�c,; . 'Acrcage of Property � Has tlie Prescnt Appl.icant . Previously Sought to Rezone, �'lat, Obtain a Lot Split, Ovtai�� a Variance or S��ecial Use Permit on thc Subj ect Site or Part of It? �d __ . c� n n � !1 /� � -V IV1ticn? {Yhat was rcqucsted v�z Fee �nclosecl$ �!� � � Rec. J�o. y��1 �� pate rilec� � Date of llearing � . � � . ..:; . . 4'Ir6��Y�1�I;r �I�U 20;i1JIG FOi.M tIt'�b� r 1� � 7�- a 3. � r�c� � 33 � 7['�►a �,it�dc�'$i�;ned undcratcinds that; (a) A liat oi All res�dLntn �nd !=��a:ru o� �r�o- � ' � perty F�i[ilin 3G0 fecC civaC b� pCCnClie�� j;� this c, i�licacioti. (b) This nppl�ctztion n.ust be w9�;��.d by cll • owacxs of tha groperty, ox r.n e: ��.nn�e�on . �iven wf�y thia �n not the cpoE. �c) ftespor�sit�ility �or c�ny �iei:cct fn thc issq^ � ceedin�� resu).ti�g �rc� the fL£i�re tv 3:�-r� the nHmea and add•re�ses of {.13, icsi.ci�nL� .. - ucid pzoperty o.?r,erb �of pr�pet'Cy c+;i.t�;�;r} ;�.:�•;� � � � feet oi Che Pro�+�x�y in quc3t�on� G�la;�;� � Co the underst�ned. � kyrQ4�3�� unc� 4:��ers o£ �`rbperCy �rithin 30� fcet:� . � �*i;RS�f.5 1lDDRES5 � �:-.—_ �`_.� -- — - --- ' � - � � / ,, �: G.�� - �--. j . . . . , '; � � . . n � �1 ' . . �. �, �;t;c�tct� a� propased property an3 structure c�uflC be dr�c�n on thQ b�ck o� C�$n �p� pr �CCact��d, 8hoc,�in� the follo.oing; 1. �oYCh Direction 2. IACAC�0�1 of i':aposed 5tx�uctura ca �o�. . 3. Ai.c�Fnsions af pro��rt�� ropo�eti . . _. ' ctructurr.. and front pnci sfde ��*_ri��4F!�, - . . � . �. Strert }ipaes . S. Locwtion �nd uae of ed��cent er.�.�C�c�� t � buildings (S�ithin 3Q0 �eet). �p t�adexs��n�d hereby dec2sras that sll the fa�t.s and representatfana tata[ed 1�p tt1�G e��l�ct�t�on �:e tr�ee end correcC. �.�►��_ � /� � � � SIGiCAiG"'r.E � 'l,� <�{.ti�-c°� ��.;�.�� r ....._......_._. -- � (AI'2'ZTCI�Y�T) . . . . � . • . • • ' a . � . . c Q er 'ii :�r St' c�' -� 1� 1i � � �.�rovcd D�riied Sy thcs ;ovzd o� Qp�ef�ba FtaG�CCt .to CI�e i�ollo�lnII CondiCiono; ' . ��;�� rrovpd I}enied • by thc Pl�nnin� Cc+;x�ioaton oct ,�b�vGt �CO tt�e k;ol�ouin� �a�dition�: �j�C� {!.n7roved t�enied by the Couocil. on �ic:t��3ct ta thc� rpllo��£ng ConSitiona; �. � dl�ta ��VI-� PC �QQ . r � � . � o� � � ,�� `��8� 0 � � M O tD � N _ .� CD . • N M d' � Lfl a � 0 � w z z . � � w J � � /'� `� . � � Q w. 2 H � 0 z w � z w > Q � N � a w > Z � � Ma (D . _ � w H Z W U U a U ^ TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: May 9, 1975 This is.to notify you that we have had a request to vacate a portion of the alley in Block 5, Spring Brook Park Addition. The Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee will be holding an informal hearing on this request on May 13, 1975 at 7:30 P.M. This meeting will be held in the Employee's cafeteria, lower level� Qf the Fridley City Hall, 6431.University Avenue. N.E. On May 2a, 1975, this same request will have an infomal hearing by the Planning Commission. This meeting wil} start at 8:00 P.M. and will be held in the Council Chambers at the Fridley City Hall, also. As you either own property in this Block or live in this area, you are invited to these informal hearings and will be given every opportunity to voice your opinion on this request and have any questions you might have answered. The City wi11 want ta vacate the entire alley in Block 5 that lies between Ashton Avenue and the railroad tracks, retaining an easement for utility purposes. �� GEORGE MEISSNER Vice Chairman Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities RICHARD HARRIS Chairman Planning Commissi�on � MAILING LIST � SAV #75-03, Machining, Inc. 140 Liberty. Street N.E. � � Tri-County Builders, Inc. 7555 Van Buren Street N.E. Minneapolis, Mn 55432 John L. Skolte 4520 58th Avenue North Minneapolis, Mn 55429 Stella M. Yahr 187 Longfellow Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Frank Zembal 161 Longfellow Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Michael Boyer 150 Longfellow Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. A1 Martinsen, Jr. Auto Frame Wheel Alignment 151 Longfellow Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Machining, Inc. 140 Liberty Street N.E. Fridley,- Mn 55432 S & W. Realty 148 Liberty Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Henry & M. Wolff ET AL 3502 14th Avenue South Minneapolis, Mn 55407 Mr. & Mrs��-LaVerne Linder 1495 Trollhagen Drive. Fridley, Mn 55421 Dennis Barker 180 Liberty Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. William Super 190 Liberty Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Minneapolis Gas Company c/o William Schram 733 Marquette Avenue ;� . Minneapolis Mn 55402 L. K. Rodman Northwestern Bell Telephane Co. 6540 Shingle Creek Parkway Minneapolis, Nkn 55432 John L. Ranck Northern States Power Company 4501 68th Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, Mn 55429 �� t 1 �__;'.- `'�`l�'/�J..L�E'�'."� . � � . � �s. _ , _ � � � SAV #75-03 MACHINING, INC. • 1.40 Liberty Street N.E. • 3o Sa 2-- '�_"__ 9 L +, ' t ' � o • � � � N �o �r �� i3 sa is i6 � i�e is z i z a 4 � Z 3 4 S 6 � �� I � g � �` O 11 1� �5�z3 � Z3 I /6 " � �'3 . - . . 3� 30 3O •7 25. e K _ � ° , ST�E »Z 2 2�0 2 8 ��' L�Z j'y�� y.� y 3O V' 6 f 'a .. . x . \ � . G3d`+d' =6i35 �{`3,9 313/ 10 9 8?7 �6 =' '� - 3,¢2 4/ 0 39 3� 3� 3� � 3� a a �e .� ' 3e� i0./ 7 30 t.- .. � . 3c u. � � 30 � 79. G • 3e J � e 3 tI /2�/.i /4�/„ G / /g /9 za /�22 3 a � p • h • . . ti �, 1�23¢56799>of/fZl3. .�' •� 'Y � 2 i Z S 2 S � � � � . , ��-- _ 3po� � \ 1 g� C/ �� ji.� I . � ti � S�R��T,� f� � � - . .. .. . .. . . L ': ii,'� 47 ,tL � b yy 30 •• � • i .. .. �,�. � . �o �s. . t � .� iy ..o � � ` I � ��/�c 39 ��f �3s 3? 2� 3 z,/ b¢a �A �,� :� ��. r' f � j 3a 3a � �� /��I a2 � � jo � :` ` �. c .G9.6� - f/8 3„ZO / j,�' i 3n 1 ai� I y y'"` , S r ,2 2A � 2 3 4 3 6 ?�iy�a , �; � ` � Z�� Z 3 2 � � °� �/ �/fi/ � �.. - � , i39_ p � _o � o ° �• . ,. Z. ,. �,.� ��, . � �° o �° � S�"��E�' . •O� � I " .. ., �C � ]� r � � r i ; � � `i � ,� z � b n ',� " '• ,. „� i � `32 �`��3Za�;z6 4 a f zi �\ ► 3 zl �' n�� IJ �.�2 °z,` �� z o . � .. ..� `i� Q 9 � .3� .33 3z13i ,.9 zP �° '° , �,_ 30 � o )n ° � �o \�B.G ti r . ' . � � Zif�' � �II.�'/ � " '" .. .. .. .. „ 3e � s�� ' /B /s�zo / Z 3 4 S 6 "��:�` Z �, � r a � F 9/o �i i,2 /,� 4/J /6 B/9 .2� �Q � ,?. ! � �/ � a � 6 � � � , � . .. � . ,. � .. :. so aa ,. ..-lG,J7. ..... ,[.t-: e�-*a,.. ��'• tC I.'� � 7 30 _: i,U 16' �' " '' �y' /'B /,td /� • . /1B ' /XB f1p• /d9/2 .` ��. �� / � � 1 ; a � ,, z 3 0 �4 ,, � � �. � � h � ys.s� o � �60 ` � _' /Lo ' \ �' � " Y:.9 39, ii � � � � • \ � , C � � --•str�.id-.• .�se7 rd. N. ' \�.C� .� ;*,'�� ' ,° o� t ,;�`� o� , o � �'.� � �,� � � � . �5 ,�.� , y , , � --__. `, 3 0 �I 33 - L� � h 1 .�.CA%N u6fU7"iG �G"At�70 < 4-• 13 14 16 l6 >7 /B f9, Za zf Z1 � — I 30 ( ' •- "eo I � r, 3� � 33 32 31 C,�9 7�`Zd 4 � I• `` ( ' • 30� � �.zmoJ 'c � P �Q �� a.5 1v i7Ji9 20 21 i9f �� ,t I � �� . i �D �� __.10 O/AiN.i6 f � � n �� ..� � ! UJ!'f sJ��.o .. .. .. .. 3e . — 3� P v ^�i l ' 3 � 9�z7z6� z4:� ° J � •� 30 ,I 7 .2 3o jo �� . . v�o �.� '/ 22 Z3 � ' N V I P ` 2s 3a � I 3o Q � �' ` � oy �o �� h�a a° � � .� \ ' �' ,�S?¢ � 3 ° j o e ;�z.s'l'�, ��, tb ar , 30 �', � ..s r-rov.�sv%F",�E ¢ � �a' • 8 3v , I '` ° �� \ 7 9�� I �. � ` � ; �� I i � :�� : �� ) ' 59 ..,..� ._ 2f � :3� _ ^ � _ � � _ ,,,. �(�� - ; iG �'r ..- •Q . �/ 4 1�`t s�.. ' � -��y� . � 5- S-�o 0 1SJ �, '"�`' N i.s}.� y ` � 1 • `^30 239.3 / P / Y �6 � ° � : Q� �I6. Z p a �7 ;: � � � zi3.3 3 < 4y ' �� ` /9 � `� \ � 20�. 4 . t� �. � � . - � � - - � „�,.� � i� March 21, 1961 � TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: This shall be a statement concerning a drive-way, right-�f-way for'Mr. John Hayes on Mr. Bernard R. Julkowski's land. Both parties shall sign this document accepting the iact that Mr. John Hayes shall have a minimum of 20 feet along the northeast border of Mr. Julkowski's land for access to the present crossing over the railroad tracks which lead to the property on the east side of the tracks. In order to do this,.Mr. Bernard R. Julkowski shall move his proposed building another 10 feet south, making a total of 45 feet set-back and 2 feet west, lea�ing a one foot side-yard on � the west side of his property. This shall leave approximately 24 feet between said building and the northeast lot border. This right-of-way shall be in effect until such time as Liberty Street sha11 be continued straight across the railroad tracks which would then give Mr. Hayes access directly off his property onto Liberty Street. At that time, the right-of-way in question on Mr. Julkowski's property shall cease to exist. • 5IGNED: JOHN HAYES SIGNED: BERNARD R. JULKOWSKI WITNESS: l _. � ' . `� , n � � � ifil�-�/L..P r�..,�2��'-�.-�-'' ��-+' ^ '' -��-C-fJ' � � G2'i�"�-� t�ti`�� L� i� l_ C�1.�%�c- � -� �7 G � � ' Y��. � ��.� v .,-��.� .�°� �, � -�r . � , � � �2� G�� ; ��. ti �'��-� _�.�� .� . �� ., n ! .,:. • . �� bJSi�L.L� Ai.L•.�V+�j�FG/l�. 1a07 Ll Y�f��W�Md�MJ�I A.JY H.iVw�%�,� ',YS I«9��a�}�S�(�.A� V.'�G -= ♦• ,� f�s.H.b / q Nwt:W��t31�i �{ ��;.i��i.Jii�iO L!�,'�T+�«iA� a�.� v✓•.�.�"'..'i i�1..1.. �J• 'i��J.�`Mn ^)':r�j �Q d..�+ i� �t�i�D1�iZ O {'31.i iJ . � o�;> ��;y� a�."�� r�o�iQn e�s� i�:� :��:�.��ai..�.��:�t� � +-� t /� T �.r� �.y� y T�/ .�. r.,n„ T�'<!'• �-•., +'�.;. ` �� °' ' � / r :`^�-!7� �6?!'� f q ��Y T n ti iD.� �T�77 S � �r- ; +�,'� \l�i� 1' i ��.�.w:�e:..a. �",,�. ,r�. .. ii x. �. :...3_..:.a-.. .. - . . ._4...-.v.. � .��.. n.-�.e.�a..:w.a",t�al..,u...�n.'•""m�"..�. � �...........e.-�..�+ , _ � ',•.t j'yl'�'1:�'1 s - <.•wrr+�. :.�i:�y.a��iw:c+� . . . ` c w�.':cis 1,� :; `. '� ��_'+,:,,+�or��3 � � 7"�':`;t ,, i � 1 . r:�':� � �n � �••y a`�.,�.3'Ac�C,�°w ��`3�.�.L�i '��s'� �.a;:'�'i.��a Za�i.3.�':Sl " „. ' v+ r � 4.ba�a ...-.w11 �. i ; -. A rrf �' �.t.j : +��, � ::� ��i ��°' ]. �i3'::v�3 �"" ��as:3 `'1..'�. ►.� i::"!.;,:.*...:. � ..:: >a ��.. .., . , , .7.e:.� r. , t� } M ) i .'� w' A w} 3 � �e„a .'y'a w� 8 .i.7�? p G�+'• �vwl� i✓.�,. a.raya��o dbsv w'�;,i�a. .. , 3 � i. . L � �. o� 3+� .' 'e� "' . ' �:.{3��.�i: ��'� '' ''�� -0- %'''�l•3•' r ��r� j.� �... t;�JL�� s1'�,'.i�'";CZ ��..3. k�s�. `�..',�..i°:t3 0 :. { :..�,�' i� ...,..e;. a„� ... . - + � '^c� s'�"�° , F.f,�,�. L�'i ,:t, =p ,r.:. :•� , � i, : r� • ; • �a� �:�a�a �.�;. o�: :�.� e�o S�.�.cxic:�c? �„ �i � . . � ?�� .�sa. �za �o��a�. ��.�. t :d ta�caar►�;.,:�o�:��,� o 4+ ryT�,,'1., �".ii 9 :'•s :::�t..� ''' 3_•..; � r. •� y� rr+.. J�-,�rf}L�1"'�' �� ??'C1 5�-:l.�n:. �^i ��.D ,.,...:.: .�:�s,.�. �� J�' �-�..,�< ... :..._. . ,. ..-_._ � ~^~,...."".::�`"� . V - f , . L',,1 „� ��,' y . 'S.S{ai i�+C��`r'.a .SM.�t�.� �'S6 � ��IaJ� 3.�:a\/3.�a1..AV� L".!�sii.il �'+��s':�a w£aw7 c .ai�.�n S . -.,,� • � +y { p'� �w �4��i.�lS 47 � y� +� r� v.� d �� .5�3. 1iy p� �'�+ yl+ 2 � ry j �� . . �•� ..46a li3 Y1 t 6.A+'�? L:'�W� �� .L w �� i�� C i"�Af J.t+�.. ia J `• n^ ' i..L.:.;,�CS.s�:�,ai�C3�i�� 3s3 ��;.'��3"„y�� a4C�'41f� a;3'�' C;��"s� �..6..~t _?.�e�s;,.3� s'°"'s:%>�.' . � � "• � s• .. .e S�� (!�� 4 xT,ss!� ��1�ryry (,� '", ":a' �y ''w 'S:,�is:-�`'� , '�r"�`� .� i� tt�.3t^_:� p �,. . �. � � ;: a .� ,. i � :7, ��V✓�M�b� 1�.r� d��'.Y`8 V'3+'.,r�^�a � i'vi�l�n'�Y �s.dfrVd . � - . a .+ r i L�".�f.'�'�� t�l,'a3 Q a2�:sYl. �'j eaj�l ds"3�3t�X7� r��:3 a.3�:t''3� o �'�i3'�`.:� SJ33 ��;i:i. �..i:.-a o "a �+ �r ��T� �,� �l1. �F.s� � Fd"�s'..�'`. � :�;T� � � . . ea'x.�,...,....a.c.c..a�..�.,..�sa�oc.na. ' . . . �� , �. � � .� ��.i •�� r� r. v��.�:��:;Gs�.: �:� t .a � < ��.� �:y�.�m�.�r� �,�a �.. ��;�.�,�'� k�v I� _ � ! �! Ttai'�'iL3�"�#.'�1 ar3�'.�i��7.«13, �.Ci �JLt'� �.'� -,Z"7t � .r�s .f'o �. t �" • r_, ,. . � , :. � c� c �}, ��. � a ��• , �ra , � e :t. �. � ^s {�%�a„��.� ..i :"i�%'�v�:F.� i aACr�..� �-��s � ".:�i.� s. °� y� -..�. � . � rS��3'��j'',�.J: .4�ibL�4..�.'.'i� mo"�dia� �.`� r� � °` �" / /�� f�9� 1r y �+. �G33 '� �"i'.,� �i2�.9 .�.'�{..'�O��•w"'`3T.:��.' �.'"'� � �.i ? s , �..� .", � � ", y� �' i ; 4�s�' �'iis�� Y ��\ V � ii WJ �.. Jw %. ._l.h . +1 .. �+!�f v� a I+ �r.�i .�r�r.�:+'�oL� t�a�}' i`°!^.3 c � �. a: � � ° : i. . . �9i� �%�}3�� ~iw.�A.�.� �!'G�.x.K.1.i+arSi A��:h�n`�e.0 . � --. '.a _. ...Y� - . ,, �,'�:9�� ac� aas� ra��a ?�s`�� t�.� ea�r�.�3 �a .a:•�?� ,��w�� r,��. ., s , �f�.."'�ia "•• '�',� ��s�.313 �3: *.��31 �C.� t� El.�...�r. ; t�""'A� Cz.'.3 �a+'a�': :�s + i i .; :�,, � � ,v �_:' �:. >..'.- F �,�4. �' ,�s ., �?�.�.� � ..��; i�� ona 4� o %�:.�� u��:� :� �7La�:�� ; _ _ _ . +i.•fi��,r�'..�r:i..'Tv%�� .� ��i'i 1Fl�1ii%�4� � .:'��'+�i o . .1s3a� ��t�ie � .�. i. c�.. ��'1 �:ar,.....? iJ } . _ .�. J ~,'_ . ._ .' o::..� .. Y g"+��d4'JJ �� G.7'O.:�iiO�Mhi •L� � i.i7��Si'� la&�� S G�wsL t 1'.r.;i`� 1`R. - r+.' � �. � . a�b�.i � e,.�i. o _, °t . .. > .'' , �, � <3�:�+� c�� .��,�p e�13� aa°:�i ��ti� ��.s va.r�.��c� ��:�c,.�.t��:.� � _ ;� �,75�� Vt.��'�e'�, �i��g �� '.5��.� �..�i, na��e3p `�� :�a'',�f..��:%� :�i:e.:': :. ��.; S,: ;i: :.....-..,. _.':i.�w.p..> y ��'T11 �� 7:�?�i2.:,;.�� "' �.''°�:�.'Stti + ��.71��`�.5. .i'� '°' �-`�� '�.+:.� ,-„w.:.� `�.�,.' .� ... .. .._.. .. .... S.`.� = �. _ -,� i�x 4 �c�:�,�ac�n a�Y�ad i r F�'� o �1.�3.:�ca�ski ��;�.�a..�z � � ��., �. � �M : .::: :�. � . .:; : v � L#ai� �uiicl�.a�g o ±'3�0 �zlkc�as��si w� �s��n�, '."s:°3:�w:'� �3�.-s s:�: 2�.::" -::-,:,; ":,��. 2y.�{,� q�r y��' t�,,, y _ �Y � Y��.i��..tfl� C%� Ldi�a:�. �Y.��.�:.x0 �'�.i • 4Ji.1�fr.�iT�w'i:��. �aLd�:t� �a.iS..I=T�.�w�t.t '�..O�t.a�. 1,.� ',�e`i.?:.....�i - :i�i��.'�Si� �Q�. ��L�flYp.. 4�� A �� Mdl� �Z.i��Si.;i.�'.�a },-:J��✓�1.'�?�'+ �l�' Vr�•�.�.,3�+.~.?� . r� �vn�:ta�r� �it� builcl.��9 P�^.e�1.'�a pxov�.�c:k� ��.ria� �i.�.� x"�c�:,�. *�,.� .:'s+.�� tlf.�t�j.33•,:y �3� EI�tiCCO� Q7' �'9a.��Ko �S�4t.°OX�f�s�+C3 �;� t'�►7�.�''�.�:to C1� '%.K» r`- '= ..%= `` �' � ��, �:�� be�i.rc� no xea,ys, f:i�� swo�i. ��xi.� :s1 ��..��i�zaoL,r_c = � , ` *�"�' •�ii6-�4.,, (fw, � ��. {� �'t^•�wl G�f..G�J .e-✓ )•1��+MTR�( CMx1� .�1+� �3J.p:y a�ws-j��e�✓% Q r`" /yy�U�v.�q t a , ri � �^�,' � ,. ��' .��i1JVJJTJ�.� �O+'+4Y 3ni.70 �V'�"�1.:J�� AJ i..'4+L.L.i.:+� iL.L� .iS�f,wt1� •.� Va: 1 ��E 1~S'1.�i h � w w�++...�s'.w......�w ��. am . ��a.:... �-iu�3.^L ��:�.iS Z.►3 �ti�Ri��i,l"��..: Tii s.� � :t..�.r xr:.',t75 1:� �.�� % d � � :a'' Z''M� ..�..� '" _a........ .�........ ..�,-::.�.�.., .+ Mb�M�� . . . . �'�:;�15� i �L�%o �� t . N�r �� ' � ' j%Ltsi'�.-c'.�v 7 ��'�