The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 10/04/1978 - 6642.� City of Fridley AG.ENDA PIANNING COMMI55ION AGENDA, WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 4, 1978 - J:30 R.M. CALL TO ORDER: ROLI CALL: APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTESi SEPTEMBER 27 1978 1. VACATION REQUEST: SAV #78-04 BY TIMOTHY MUNN AND TODD"BLAIR: Vacate County Road "R", Lakeshore Avenue, Railroad Avenue, and Oxford Street, and all alleys in Blocks 1, 2 and 3, of an obscure plat that was known as Mill Company's Addition to Fridley Park, to clear up legal problem on Torrence property so Munn's Hillcrest Addition can be recorded at Anoka County. (Hillcrest Addition platted in 1923). 2. CONTINUED: MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT 3. REVIEW TIMETABLE FOR REVIEW Of PROPOSED CHANGES iN f.HnPTFR �n� 4. RECEIVE ENVIRONMENT 978 5. OTHER BUSINESS: , ADJOURNMENT: COMMISS AT MEETING 1-3 Separate At Meeting BLUE � CITY Or FRIDLEY MINNCSOTA �� PLANNING AyG' `f N��Z/G � NUM6ER � G �'� APPLICANT'S SIGNATU , ,ur.✓ Address �,e,��a,Lr,.?v�,54? ��j�,b-LWI�.I�;.�S�jzZ Telephone Number� $r3S—.�1�� '� t''-�'S �%d � PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATUR�„u. Address;�"�yr;� � . � Telephone Number Sb;n')6 • Street Location of Property �,qQr�C, %l's��./�Q+ Legal Description of Property / TYPE Of REQUEST Rezoning Special Use Permit Approval of Premin- inary f, Final Plat � Streets or Alley Vacations Other Fee�•�"1Teceipt No. �.3�� v'//S �)nt/t' G � Present Zoning Classification �r� Existing Dse of Property�/,��{j1✓�� Acreage of Property �, �%� Aescribe briefly the proposed zoning classification or type of use and improvement proposed /('-% . Has the present applicant previously sought to rezone, plat, obtain a lot split or variance or special use permit on the subject site or part of it?�_yes no. What was requested and when? 1'he undersigned understands that: (a) a list of all residents and owners of property within 300 feet (350 feet for rezoning) must he attached to this application. (b) This application must be signed by ail owners of the property, or an explanation gi.ven why this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any defect in the proceedings resulting from the failure to list the names and addresses of all residents and property owners of property in question, belongs to the undersigned. A sketch of proposed property and structure must be drawn and attached, showing the £ollowing: 1. North Direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on the lot. 3. Dimensions of property, proposed structure, and front and side setbacks. 4. Street Names. 5. Location and use of adjacent existing buildings (within 300 feet). The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. DATE }��T� SIGNATURE �rf'� 1�cHi � � , ��'v! � (AI L CANT) Date Filed Date of Elearing Planni,ng Commission (dates)�a l�/7� / Approved City Council Approved Denied (dates) Denied .�,, i. � c { _� ...__. _-----1— � / � •\� \\,! � � . . . �... .. . �. Y , . � .e•�'-"-- _ ` �< , �� _.m. r MR,T�MOTttY 1-tuNI+J �2SZ Vn,�T't R-J�. Na. RoenrnuD�t.� �Itint SSYzZ L 3 �aw oFVicES � . LAPP, LAZAR, LAURIE & SMITH 1200 Builders Exchange Bldg. — Minneapolis, Minn. 55402 Telephone: (612) 338•5815 i �j � �t DoTe: �^%y� � p � � _ !7 s�b;�+: Mrc-c.. co. P��-T 7'1M : , �TTt'� �NGt..c�Sbl) PR'R.T!/t l, C�Y K � f- TL.b M! l.C. G0�1L'ANy S 1+UD�T7o1'J Stt�wS Ti'ts- S�, ,L'��73_�'f'�1_il_�LL'E�fS WttlGhl ft�-�� N�ve2 ¢t-�N *'ro�e�+i4�._�_Vftc��D. Tft� vttc..�77a� P��ortJ cza� c..(�_t$�_Z� vrt c�/. �� 7� � Po�Tlo 1 OP H[ L C�Gc/� NAN Y�S � ADOinaN �ro F�e�D�Y1�?�?�n�c�_nc��__4�s�t2�t� �+D R�.i.t�L.ir _G_y,n1�..fcv rt��c..c�e�s'�dOn�-rzvn�� _c,g4�r'?'L_ nn� �� o�. "�+3_ ------ _� P_L_G! f c G.� _ST.XE�73-%�w0�%_LL Z'_'ji 14S_l /h ?N'TL_0_NZ�D a✓ b� 7�a' �1tdNa . . 77t�—C..A N 6u/4��--Gts-g�p--sno �.s.LD___ L F�.vnt, c�%� ►�PPzavnc` . Signed 6 SEND ORIGINAL COPY: TO ADDRESSEE i,. �7ia _ �/1 � 6 �d..R�.�_ � ��?%�.�-- - I ' . .. � � _ . � � . t ' � . � +�� ♦ ENERGY COMMISSION Interested in Servinq Betty Enkhaus, 6731 Monroe Street N.E. 571-1652 Donald E. Wall, 6850 Washington Street N.E. 577-2273 Mr. Wa11 is presently employed in energy field and his work requires him to travel extensively. He is very interested in this commission and would like to be considered as a resource person. He will attend meetings when possible and would like to be kept informed as they progress. Giles McConville - 1588 Gardena Avenue N.E. 574-0107 September 26, 1978 William Wharton Dennis Anderson 6887 Channel Road N.E. 470 Ely Street N.E 571-8555 786-2509 � �. �:; � �. t a, �J' d > . �' ... __�'1-;`..v' ,�-.,: . , N �: " � crrr oF Fxrnz� PLANNING CObAlISSIOft !�&'PING _ p�TpBSR 4, 19'la CALL Tfl 09tD�t: Chalr�n HarYis called the October 4, 1978, Plwnning Co�iasioa Meeting to or8er at 7:40 p.m. ROLL CALL: tAesbere Pressat: Ned Storl,�, Richsrd Harrie� Patricia Gabel, Jim I,�anfeld Mqbere Absent: LeRay Oqriiat, Robert Peterson, Virsiaia SeYwabel Others Present: Jerreld Boas�dsw, City Planner, Robin Suhrbier (arrived at 8t30 p.m.) RSCEIVE APD APPRtDVE PLANNING COM[4I3SIOH MIHU.�E3: SiSPTSFID�R 27, 1978 MOTIOB by Mr. I.an��nfe1,�� seeonded by Ma. Gabel, to reeeive the September 27, 1978, �ag Ca�lesion Minut�s. UPON A VOICS VOTE� AIS. VOTING AYE� CAOTRMeR HAREIS D�I+ARED THE NXn.'ION CARRILD i1NAilIM0U6LY . iqTIOH 'by Mr. I.qnQenfeld, eeconded by Mr. Storle� to apPrwe the 3eptember 27� 1978� Plannin� C�aiseion Mtautes. Chairman Harrie called Por discuselon. Mr. Lwgeafeld steted that on pqge 7, he had asked if the Mesora�� of Agrt�nt referred to tenant landlorde, not special groupa. Mr. BoarBman atated thnt on page 6, itm A ahoul8 read: Ii the alley ie vncate� or imprrnred, Yinal imprmrements be �ade. Ms. Gabel atatad that on pr�ge 8, the firet paragraph under 4, last eentenee ffihould read: °If you're going to flesign a code to prevent varioncee, the code will bQ to� looee to be any good, and then you don't nsed a variance process. We do have a handle on it because they have to prove a hardship.° Ma. Gabel asked Mr. Starlo if he had gone to Wickes, and xhot he'fo�nd�out. Mr. Starla stated that he had �one to WicYea and was told that they hare their �rn cradit et�p�y vhich eperatse out oY Chioago, and that he vould call Chicago and gQt back to Mr. Storla in a few dt�ys. Mr. Stcrla tald them he aeade� th� iriformatlm by tade4y� ond xhess he didn't hsar frm them, ho ealled over thtr� and was t�ld they vere etill vorkia� oa it in Chics�o, aad he xould get back t� Mr. 9torl.a to�rrov. Mr. Harrie statad that on page ]A� the last para�raph,. ffir. Alexander�s nAae ia Joe, not Joy. -� � : _ ., � � _ � _ .� p. - r� p , o,_ . , r = - - _ . _ -f ., .� _ . � . c , . -c o:• � .� _._ _ :,, _ p� _ 0� J i - - _.._. � 1 1 , _ ._ __. �' -�� c:.� - _ _� .,.__ ,a__� __ �_ ._ Ol_0 __ o ,. _. �,-,'� - -- _ , _ ,,. D '_' 0 _ . . _ _ . . . , _., . � � „ _� _� _ _ _ ro o� ,-_ .;; . � _ , ;�^ _ _ - 0 ., � . � c: - ,-- �t r� , _ ._ _ _.. � t �� -� � � � _ _ _ � . � -: o _ � �; c�_ ` _.� � � � - ' - _ _ , . ,, � o ; ;. - a� .� _ :i�._ .. .. .� .�� . _ . .� O _ .'L`_ " . . . �. _. � . . _ .. .. ..- . �. . - p , . -.. _ . � . •O� ' __: _��J_ a..� ..__-_ . _ .. � �. �GL _ �� . � ..= O '-_ � _ � . .- ,_�..0'_ . _�_. .__�, ___ _ .. .� ._ _� --�0:. _.: ��' OJ. �f - � . . . .,.-. � O � .. ' .... .- . � �. , . .i59.:3':�ED _,. . .,_ _ " _ _- � ., . _ � .._. � . -, � -._'.-_" .. _� `OJ" ._ ..__._ J_ _'J ' ' ' , ..__.- ...._ C _. -� _ . . „ .. :. . .,_ .. -_ "' : . `. `' � - , .. ._. „ . _ _ _ � _ . _ „ � __ _ _ v _ _ _ p _ . . �_ O.: � . _ . . � C: -. � .� . . -. .- _-. . � ,.'- _ . ..,. ..__ . . :_ �_ ,_.....: , '__ � -_�.�.JG .:._ _ -_ , -, � �„ _. „ ._ . _,. � . . _ .. �, ., r . _ . � _ ,.,, . - � - _ . ; -. . -. ,. ., ... . J : . „ . . •� _.. ]. , �J�' _. 'i � .. J. � ' _.� .J' ._ _ �. ._C �..`_. . . -_ .'.-.O :O- �_�. �C � . . �.. ...��. � , __ ,....T., _�_ �.-- _ �__. _. ;. __ _ �.. ., ._.-_C_ .: . C.� r0.. -� _� �_' . `� PLAB9ING Ctk�l.iSSIO� I�TIHG, aCTOBIIt 4, 1978 - PAGB P Ms. Gabel ask�d lAr. Board.an if he had found out aboa�t the trial !or the L4) foot lo'Oa. 2fr. Boas�l�nn stated tloat it ha8n't bs�n achedulad ret, as+d the attora�ye are atill rorki.� An::all_the-work-which=proe4�ds-a_fi.rial. Lh�. Boaidman etatad that it vc�uld probab�jr b� Janvasr, February ar Marah � sezt year. �PON A VOICE VOTS� ALL Vt1TING AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRI3 DSCLARBD THE A�IOA T0 �RPROYE �"SSPTEF�IIt 27, 19'T8s PLANNIHG COI�QSSION MINlTPSS A3 CORRECTSD, CARRISD [TNAAIMD(1SLY. _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ l. VACATIOH REQT�STC SAV �78-04. BY TI1�lOTHY MUlT17 AHD TODD BLAIR: Voeate Cueaity Rsad "R", Lakeshore Av�aw, Railroad Avenue, and O�doa�d SEres3� and all alleya sn Blacks 1, 2 and 3, of an obecu�e plat that vas knwn ae Mill C�paay'e Addition tv Fridley Park, to elpr up lodal probl� on Torrance prapsrty ao Muna'e Hillcrsat AQdition cqn be recoided at Anoka County. (Hillcreet Additi� plattad in 1923)• Alr. Boardean stwtw,i tt�t the probl�m pes that the Mill Cae�a�r Additioa vas awer a r�corS�d plat at the City oi Fridley. It �ras neorded at tlu Cwnty but hae never been at the Citr of Fridley. Tn order to clear up the legal problsms we had under the Hillcrtst Addition� we bav� to vacate all c�Y the old plat beceuse of the Alill Ca�pany Addition, eo that they can record or ■ak� iaprweaenta th�y+ aead to make on the property. Mr. Harris asked if the petitionere rioizld like to 'alce anq stateaeats. Mr. t�unn and 1�. Blnir had no caoents. Lh�. Langsnfeld askad ii all thia vas vacatsd, would it thea join the tvo blaeke ae euch to�ether. i�h. Harrie stated that it rauld, a�l t�ey wowl.d then fil� their n�r plst. They c4nnot fils their new--plat ustil thesf etr�ets and �lleys are �aeatsd. lk�. Harria aoksd if the necessary easesmts and thl,sgs wre taken csare of in the sev plaitias. Mr. Boasd�as sta��d that th�p* vare. Mt'. HaTTis Y�1[�d if_they_knQSa..whea-this old plat was recorded at the County? Ilr. Dk�na stat�d iu tho�hS it nan 1876. MCTI0D1 by Ms. Gab�l, aec�ad�d by Mr. Storla, tc nepwad to City Ceancil' qpproval t�8 ths Vncation R�qwet: 3AV �'(8-04i by Tiaotby Munn and Todd Blair: to racqte Conrty Ro�d "R", Lakeehore Aveaue, Railroad Meaw, and Ozford Str�et, and al all�ye ia sl0el�e 1, 2 and 3, oi an ob.cure p].rt tbat �+as knrnm ae AI111 Ca�pa�qY'e Addition te Fridley Park, to clur up legal prdnlea cn Torr�na� prop�rty to iiunn's Hillcr��t Addition caa be r�eorlled at Amoka C�unty. (Hillcrest Ad8ltien platted in 1923)• � i . .� _ (^_., . _,..... ., .. . ��, ... . ..... . _.. � .. - . _ ' _ _ .::�' O�i.�_ C .:.�� .J, . :. � L _:C �..�� .. :i. �_ .;:,. ' .. ,.�_:i .. ,_�::"_ �- -;• J.J _ ` `-- � ._ -..:.. ��L:. :,": .✓..; .._O ^ '.i�.� . _ .' .�... , .: _ .. , . _ . .. � D".- - . � ' . . . . , .. '. _ . . .. V . ., ' � � . . , L' . �.�_ �..�� . . _ .. . . J � C .. U-. ., . l � ��:: . .� J. J . _ �J�� _. .• . �., . .� . .,._..(j �. II ; .1�� .�'�� ._ "I � . ..� . . . . - . . . .. . . . . .. . � . .?Q_l.^ _ . � .. i� _, _.� . � . �� ,. . ., . .. . _ . ,. i. _ � . . . . . _ _ . . .. l - � _. �� . _ � � ,. . � , � . . ' . , .... �.� .. ��.. � ,.. � .,. � ... � . ._ ... ,..J.� �� } -_.... . .. . rl -.-,. . �.. . .. . � . . _ _ . � �.J � . . . . i _ _ , . � � _ .. � _ ' . � . ' Z: ; �, c � ao�� - , '-C _ _ �. .. . — _ - - � " � - � ., _ _ � c a . . , , , - _ c` ' o 0 o _ � , �. - _ �. _ ,� � . _ _ � _._ � � �. , _ e— ,_ -:_�.-. _..— .. - _"_ ; � '. c_: , � � �:;: � =._--_ o � = �c ��_ c �� _� c � ' . -_ _ � , _ _. . �-�,;,__ _ _ _ _ _ � _ ,; ___ _.� , �� _ _ � . _ �3 _.:-;o� �, ; o� �� __ e' �_o: �__ -_ J . :,, � � ;o ,._ _ c'_�-_ :..= u� .�-.,�. ..o:�.-z^ , �, ,c�, � -� - ;o. - _ . _. .. _ .� � . ,. ,. . c ::.�- -o� . � �3 ,___ . . .. _ .. � � �-,�t-.� . - .: -::� ..-_. . � - . . f `_o.- .- -i�.. - .. - .. ,...... _. . .. u �.- -.. ,-.. .. - � . _... -- �. _ .._ �.. . � . . : . _.,� .�� „ ..... . . .. .. _.._ . .; . . ._. o.-'� � . � . �_ -i _. . �.._ _ � .__�: .. .. . , . ..o. _.. _ � : :�� -� r::c _ .- . � .,. . .,... '' .� :. � :� . ., . _" • PLAITDIIxG Co)BeisslOH !�'1'IxG, OC'iF�SR k, 1978 - PAr,B 3 �Oa A V�ICB VOTS� ALL V�TING AYE� CHAIRMAII HARRIS DECI,ARffi1 TI� A�TIOA CABflIY➢ U�ARIiIDUSLY. I(r. Harris ini�rm�d Mr. Mu�a aad Afr. Blair tlaat lhio rould go to Council aa Octoi�r 23, 1978. 2: -:COPl3'IN[IED: �UM OF AGR�DiT: MD'PIOA bq Alr. 3tor].a� eecoaded by Ms. Gabel, to contiaue the M�morandus of Agrtwnt. UPOH A VOIC� VOTE� ALL VOTIHG AYE� CHAIEiMAH AARRIS DSCLARTD THL MOTIOPi CARRIED UNAFIMOUSLY. 3. xEV�t 2n�r�La Fcae 1tsv� oF �toPOS� c�c�s n� cxA� 205. zox�xc: Mr. Bc�x�dnan etated that he sese nothing vra� with th� timetabls and ww�ld like thec��ri:ssaRns to do a little preparation befcrre tku mtstimg. Mr. BNxdmon ata%ad that he woiil.d like to at�y vitiiin the tiDetable ead would etteowra�e ths �esission to aot use the ti� at tku meetings for their revie�+ tise, but tc us� the aeetia� tiae to bring out their reaaa�tndati�ns en the ordinanc�. Mt. BOaTd�YII atat�d that member commissions have two months for review, and the _ Plaoain� Ca�isdon ia schedulRd for bhree snetia�ej tvo re8u].ar mee'Ciage aad oas p{abli¢ heariag aeetiag. Mr. Haarie atatsd that thoy niQht be rwnning a little tiQht, but they �roxld give it a trq. Mr. Board�xn stoted thet if the Cameiasione felt they aeed�d additi�l aeeting time� he would s�ggest thvy hold additic�al meetinge. Ms. Gabel asked Mr. Norrie if he was atill rmrk].aQ vrith the Chamber regerdi� thia. llr. Harrie atatad that he ha�a't talked to the7a at all about thQ eLanges ia the Zoair� Code. Mr. Harrie etated tbat they had Lad o�nra]. �etmtc�r6hrre and it wac d�MdeB that we rrot+ld go throush it and caae up vrith our reca�4tiona for c�.e, and tls� they vould xyact to tlsat. Me. 6ab�1 ask�d xhAt iwd lupp�aed to tlu p].as where thtr vould have �e graup go thxrore�h th� iaduatrial aad oae sroup go through the ca�ercisl. Mr. Harris stat�d that it had fall�a thraigh. Mr. ysngtnteld atoted that ia regarde to the Eaviromiental Qtulity Cae�ieaioa, rotkur thaa have thea go thrcwgh it in detail, he would like to approach it vith tht environa�ental etandpoint in 'ix►d. Mr. Laa�enfeld etatad tlut Mr. BoarSman had included sw�e items thq voinld be conetra�d about, and perhape thsy could have ia general certaia �avironssatal atatqents that epply to reepective ordinnacss. —._ — —. _ — — — -� - :--- —': s _ '� . - :. � _ ., � _ _ , . :. �:�c o: o! ., 'r, : f �_ .__ _ �. c r � -. _. ,_ -cc`��__ _ . _ ) ._ 0: ° ' � - d . � .,. �. ,-_ �: � _ , � �J.:: .. � . �.-. � � ' � .. ., . , ' � `�. � r , � � _ _ _ � , � ...�.�� . . � . ...��. .. ..J :.. .l ... . . .� � . . ^ . ^ . ._ . __ '-.,,. .' " .J. �.;.,. ... � ;:� _ _.' .... �_ �O .) J . O. ^ .. _. � .._ . � :J �.L . . - )S� �._- , � p . )�: ' . � . . ' ]. � : . ,.. ..�. O ` _ '? . O . '�_ ^ ,iJ . � � . '-_^ - _ ._-. � .�_- . .. .... ' . . .., ._... � . ._. -�)� . - _ .. . _ . . . _ _� . .. O . ,. - -r -� -? .- --,� �' _ -. . . . . : - .. . � .. . . _^ �"... .0 � .. ,. _ , _. - �... . �� ( .: _ . -.. .a '-_ . .. ., o� . ." _. � ., ... -.-. �. .. . ..'.: _ . . 1 . "__ . � .� _. . _ �. .. V'_J _, . __. .. _ - .�.. ._ . ..�� . .. . ... � . . _... . . ., _ �. .:_. .. _ 1Ji�S�.. _-_ _ -_ . � ., . .. ,. .. . �. �. _ . . .: -..!. . . _- _ ... _ . _ . " �..0 . .`- i". :.� . ._ � , .. J. _ . ..J._ � � , - .. .., ..-.- _ �.. - _. .. �. .. �. . . . . ..: -�. _ _ . . ..,. . �_ - _ _ .._ J . G... - O _ . .. �_ "" . : .. '.n' _ , _. . � .. .. . . ... ._. _..'O. �. O ` . . _� J. --O ._ _.... .. ' ., - .. : _ .. ... . _ .. . . . _ '.: ... _. . ' . . ' . . . � . ... � . - .. . , �. - .. . ._ V_.i1JD �'s�t.� � ..;:iDf t`9 t-�u .7liC 0- �:JLT" �. GIfOD ' S UOA r �ry3 s ; �5 '' . . . . . „ � -�.; � � _. - . � � -. .. .. . . , . : ... - ,.. . . - PF.�A2JING C�A@�'I33I0N t�ETING, OCTOBER b, 19'j8 PAGE 4 bls. Gabel ststed that in the areas the Appeals C�iseiwi deals with� the changes ars very obvious, but you could spend an ewt'ul lot of tine refereacing back. It se�d that the only vay to handle it vould tae to go through and see ii aaa�thin� cavght ycur eye or didn�t sem ri�ht, because yw rea].�y couldn't keep erose-reforsncing back. Mr. BOardman stated that in the document they ahwed deletiona by erossing out, and a71 sectioae u�ierlined are neW additione. Thoae that are not underliaed are the old ordinance. In soae csses, the underliraing wae miss�d, but not in verq meny eases. � r • M r• ia� • � r � � n ti�i� :,� �: a+° . .; Mf3TI0N bq Mr. Langenfeld� seconded by Mr. 3torla, to receive the Saptember 19, 9'�Lnvircmmoatal Quality Camiisaion Minutes. Mr': I,�safold poiaSed out that on the firat paQe oY the minutea, regarding ths diacussion on the IdnDOT Plan - Poeitioa Paper� Me. Johason appeared st the asetir� ammd prorided a¢reAt deel oP information comeernin� the airport back in 1968. Her positioa �rae to try to rejuvsnate the old airgort idea agaia. Mr. La�genfeld s'6ated that if the Co�ieaioa was lntereated, the minutes c6n- tain a little histcrry regarding tLat. Mr. 7,anQenfeld statad that t� poasibility of ea�thing like that happwiag doee esiat. Mr. E.aaganfeld etatad that on page 3, under Issuos of Concern, they prwided their position. Mr. Lan�eafeld asked Mr. Boerdaan 3f hie understand4ng irse eorsect that our coo�ents or position pepers vill be reviewed by Stsff and then 3kaff would ineorporate our comments with their own and then appear bafore MnDOT in regards tc ths hearing. Alr. Board■an ateted that vas correct. Mr. 3torla aaked if the airporC�+*as planning to s�,ritch _ fro� sn 3ntermadiate Systea to o Kay 3yet�. Mr. LangenYsld stated that ti3et's vhat-they:are trying to find out through the MnDOT hearings. Ms. Langenfeld atatad that th� MnD�t thingwas e� vague, Lt+at thRy �ti�l�y didn't know wY€at -tiheq -��r� a£t�r. Mr. I,an�enfeld poiste& €rut that an page 5, therowa:s • definition of the Key 3ysteta and ths Fatexv�ediate 3ystm. Mr. LansenPeld xeferrad ta pa�r 7, wher� they bad a little confliet with the aniwtl protecLiar ordinance. Mr. Langenfeld stat�i tlut he had beea "acc�" tLat thiswas a perscnal thinQ, but it rtallyraasn'�e. l�r. Lat�Qeaf.ld stated tlu�t it iavolves the eaviron�sat as far ae aoisa and lualth� �pd the health� safety and rrelfare od children. Mr. I.ang�nf.ld stated that rsgardiag the se�inars xvferra3 to aoa page 8, �he Planiisg Ccmiaeion vauld rectiva a repart. Mr. Langeafel8 etated that the Eaviros+sental QualiLy Caoissian }ud mn8e 1t a atipulaticoa tha�t vhmn their peogle atLtad a semiaar, they subait a writtsn reviev of whAt they learned. Nr. Boasd�an svageated tlut thay nat send a��yome tm a seainar vithout Camiiesion approval. _ _ o � � _ : � : , � _: ._ _ . _ :, � „ , .. _ _ �-- , � _ o. ., � < _ - - , . _ cc -. . -_ ,, �. � : ,,, � _ _ o : _ � r o _ .; _ ' _ - _ � c _ _ _ c� . _. . _�o _. .-�.: � - - � � � . . _ _ - �. . _:.. � . .,..,,__ .�: _ . _ . .,� . _ . ,�.. .. .. ... „ - _ .__ c . .. . . - - � _ ._ � � � _ - _ _. � - - � - -- � �__� _ . . _ .. . _I ; _ . .. .. . . . �... - . . . . . _. ._. . . _� �:_ o;s ;.:: : _ Ci � . _ _ � - a _ _ _ v :; -- ' -� _'_.� ' �" - _ - - _ __� . � , _ � � :� o .__ _� � � . .. _ . �.. - =_J ;.-- . .7 ; .-.,., .,_ .. . ._.. -� .� �-_ :,r. - � ...- _ . -' . _ .,,.. . . �_... _'. . . .. - _ .. � . _ �.., , _. _ .. - -, .� _ _ _ ,• _ .. , _ -.,. . _.._ . . . . . __ ., _: _ . .. „ ..::; . .. ., �.. _ .,.. . ..:� i. . . . _ , . . _�_ . ' � C� .^�-'. .' ' . . �:�-.:'.�; ' . ^.�- :)�- . .... .^ -C. ''^ ._' �.^:_'.�� ' .: �^ �'..� . . ^ . .'_ .� J __ -.-_ .. . _� �. � _-. ._ .... .-�.. . ..'.. .. + .�._,. _ ' �. . __ . ., . ...: . . . . _ . ._ _�: , ,_ . _, __ - . ,_ L - , � � _ , . _ , : - - ' : _ _ � _ . � ; :� �, _ _ ^ _ , � _ � . . -. . � - . _ ,. , . ,. . , ,, , � _ _. � c � _ �_ - -., - .. _� . - .._.,. - . _ ,...�., .,. ,. _ . .. . . ...:� :. � ��.. . _��. _ . . .. . . . . .,_. ; o�t ' c� � Ts r , ; ', _ . . . � - - • • -, _- - . 0 . -_ . . � , . --- . _, - , c _� : : _ _ _ � ;. , � �, , _ - i�-. ��. �� ,�_ < .5,� = ._��.. �..-.. .=.-_�-..- ;- . -�._.� o� � . _ . ..... .:__. -- _ . . ... . �=�_v'�.: _ ._ . .. _ .,r -- ... . , _ _ :-.... .,:.�. ,r.., - _ ,�� .. _.. ,..�:- - � -� - � � ...,_. .,:_,., , _ .� _ . . „ . �`,_:._ . ., . . _ , .. .�� - ,. ... ... . _ . � -.._ , .�. .� -� . . _ � ..,, ` - -� . _ . . . _ � . . , . �. � � -_.- _'. ._ . __. ,.. .. �._ ,._,. ,. - ,�. . . . ._ : � _ . .. . _ �_ � _ :. . . � : ; _ _ . . �_.. .. ,�-.r-C, � . . .,; _.. �. _ ._ .. ._. � ; .. .�.,... .... . ..:_. _. : .'..:,, :_ _� ^ i7.AHDIING C01!�IISSION MEBTING, OCTOBSR 4, 1978 PAGE 5 U�'ON A VOICTs 902'�� ALL YOTING AYE, CHAIIi!!AN HARRIS DECLARffi1 TSB 1d0�SI0N CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. . 5. ar� Busn�ss• A. I�TI6A by Mr. Storla� aee�ded by Mr. Langwfeld� to reeeive co�unication re�ing ffiergy Carmiasion. l�tr. Harri• asked Mr. Bcardaan if these Were aer namee. Mr. Bp�rdman ststsd that the three abtrve are nev and the two belv�r are old. Mr. Bs3rri�an statW tbst l�ttsra vere sont to the Chasber of Ca�erese and they m�de a special reqwst to tlu City Cauncil� aad thsp names �rere rsceived� hcnrever they haven�t r�ceive�l asqr restiwe fros thsse people. Mr. Boardman stat� that he cont4ct�cl tlusa pevple Rnd aske8 thes So submit a letter, but they never did. The only tiro letters received vere frm WLarton aad Anderson. Mr. Boarde4a stai�,ed that it lwkad like they haQ a eex�aii�tee of 4 mqybe 5. Nr. Lsn�eafeld atqt�d that he vould bs alqd to ssrv� a� the Ca�ieaion in his apars tia�. Nr. Harris su�ested delqyias it a little lcwger to see what happ'as. Mr. Bwrda�a statad tiaat if thsy d�lqyed� the people they had sov me�y-3�,sae iat�rest. Mr. Bcardnrn suggtsted that �hey makt th� appmiatsonts aov, and if mo�� nanos ac�e in, th� Plannin� Co�isei� caa then appoint th�. D�. Lw�eaield etoted tlut be vould like to esrv� ia aa advieorq capncity. Mr. Harria stated that his neighbor, Mr. CheL Potasek,� a ntired engiaear frm the gae caape�r� k�ad atated th�S he vould like to eerve. Mr. Iiarris ha& aot yet received his res�ss, but understa�s that Mr. PaEas�ic has had several y�are szp�ri�t¢e ia the saergr field, xith Minnestrta Sto't� ffiergy Ca�iasion when they �rere� eet up �a ltl.nniGaeCoe rtpresentativs. Mr. Harris st�'ted he xould like to •dd his npse ta the liat. ldr. Potasek's a8dreas ie 31� 62nd W�y. UPOR A V�ICE VOT�� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRI3 DECLARffi1 Tf�;I+�TION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION by Mr. Storla, aecaaa8ed by Ms. Gabel, to appoint the wuaes aa the ist B�tty &nkhaus, Donald W�11, Gilee bkC�ville, Williem i�Ihart�, aad Dsna3a Aa+deraen)� Chst lota��k, a� Jim Langenfeld to tho Ener� Ca�issio�n, vith Mr. Borria as a temporary chairman. t1POH A VOICS VO'i'E ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN AARRI3 IJSCLARED THE MOTION CARRIID I�h�. Harrie atated tlut tZu firat meetins of tiu &n�r;y Caoiaeim r►ill be on Nrnaber l, 19'T8, at 7:j0 p.m. .� < •' �1ac C�es�ox 1+�r�xG, t�eTOa�t 4. 19'la PAGS 6 B. Mr. Lan�enfeld atated that he rioulct like to direct atteatian to the cireular entit2sd Reeeat I,arr Caees, 2crsing - 9pecial Use Peraits, phich wae giv�n tc th� C�aiesiaai by Mr. Bo�sdaan dvring the Sspt�ber 1�, 1978 Planning Ca�isaicon Mesting. Mr. Lanasaield asked that ths Ca�ission �eabere rea8 this, beca�se they s�ty ha�rs occ�eim to use it. Mr. Harria stttsd th�t he rrould 11ke to diacues thte �nd aaked Mr• Bos:dman to get a copy af it far him. Mr. Harria stated that he voail.d like to talk to Covacil about thia ss� get soee 8lreetion. Mr. Harrie stated that ha thought th� City Attcrney ahould reseorch it and give tha� •�orandim oo the rrhale situat�ar. MGTIaIlT by Mr. I.snQenYeld to reaeive a legal opinian ira■ the City A�torn�y r��ing recwt lav caees. Mr. Hqrrie ev�ested he diaeuee it rrith Cwneil fisst, and then repart baek. Mr. L�ngenfelS withdrsw ti1�e motiaai. C. Ms. Suhrbisr at4ted t�t there ha,ve been probiMS rrith bxildins in hcr neigh- borhoqd and q coaple o� the aeighbars 4re puttin� ths City on alert tlut pictr►r�s have be�a takes K rrbst's bean built is the nei�hborhood and if th�re ar� preblais vith thoae haeea, Lhey are villin� tc testiiy irbaL thoae iumes are b�i.lt oa. Thq are built oa awamp and peat nmd hvQh coucrete fill. Mr. Harris etated that the Pl�nning Co�iseioa is rrtil avare �f the probl.em and lu� �aad sa�y disawssiome vith aouy pevplt inelu8ias the Dl�i. Mr. Iiarris syrpathizad with the pevpl� agd stated that the Casiseion rrould appreciate aqy co�micationa iraa� the r�sideate, and they aeuld sead th�m to Mr. Boqidnan gr the Plwning Cadiesioon. M�TI�N by Mr. LangenY�ld, seccmded bq Mr. Storla, to adjourn the Oetober 4, 1978, P�ina Cmiesian Meeting. UPO� A VOICE VOTE, AI.L VOTIAG AYE, CHAIIiNAA HARRI3 DSCLARffi1 THE MEETING ADJflfktN&D AT lOsAO p.m. RE3PECTFULLY SUB1aITTED: KATFIY � RECaRDI�G SBCRESARY MEM$ERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT OTHERS PRESENT: CAI,L TO ORDER: ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COi�AfISSION MEETING SEPTEMSER 19, 1978 7ames Langenfeld, Bruce Peterson, Connie Metcal,f Lee Ann Sporre, David Sabistina Ray Leek, Planning Aide Jackie Johnson, 6580 Channel Rd. N.E. Chairperson Langenfeld called the meeting to order at 7i40 p.m. APPROVAL OF AUGUST 15 1978 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Bruce Peterson, seconded by Connie Metcalf, to approve the August 15, 1978, Environmental Quality Co�ission minutes as written. unanimousoly e vote, all voting aye, �airman Langenfeld declared the motion carried APPROVAL OF AGRI3DA: MOTION by Bruce Peterson, seconded by Connie Metcalf, to reverse the first two items on the agenda, putting "Continued: MnDOT Plan - Position Paper" as Item �kl and '"Continued: Innsbruck North, Second Addition, Wetlands" as Ytem 4�2. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye,Chairman Langenfeld declared the'mqCion,carried unanimously. 1. CONTINUED: MnDOT PLAN - POSITTON PAPER: Ms. Johnson stated that she had been involved with the Anoka County airport many years ago and had kept her files until about two years ago. She had thought she wouldn't be involved anymore. She knew an airport would be proposed for the northern suburbs, but she really did not think it would be Che Anoka County Airport, so she had given her £iles away. Last week, she had gone through the files with Lee Ann Sporre, and Ms. Johnson stated it was a mind-boggling thing. Ms. Johnson gave a copy of a letter she had written to the editor before she had gone through the files again to the Comm3ssion. She stated she also had copies of newspaper clippings to give to the Commission, and the Coamiission could go over the clippings and verify the key clippings as to what was happening. She stated she was most amazed at the strategy being used. She stated that the Metropolitan Airports Commission wanted to move„the noise fran International Airport. They had promised the citizens that, they would get rid of the jets. ' ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONQ�IISSION MEETING SEPTGMBER 19 1978 -_PAGE 2 Ms. Johnson stated there was a lot of confusion as to what was meant.by a new airport, and she thought it meant Anoka County, because on the new Metropolitan Systems Map of April 1978, there were 1990 projections, and the north search area that had been recommended was not on the map. The map identified the 1990 arterials going around the Anoka County Afrport, and the intermediate arterials (which would be the airways) going around International Airport. From all the clippings she had, it showed there was a battle going on as to whether there would be one afrport or two, but there were backers who wanted Anoka County. They had proposed it way back in 1968 as a major airport--not only a major airport, but a world airport. That had startled her. Another startling thing she had learned early in her Eight was that first they had proposed the Blaine site (which was the Anoka County Airport expansion they had now}. Right away that was dropped because of the heavily populated areas around the airport. Then, shortly after that, they had discovered where the boundaries overlapped, and it they had one side, they auto- matically had the other. Through her clippings and following the "Pro- North" people, she could back the fact that Ham Lake was still in the running. Ms. Johnson stated that anothei: thing that the Commission might know was that International Airport had a huge debt from new runways built in the last few years. This debt would not be paid off until 1990. The argument was how they were going to phase out one sirport and get the other one started. The "Pro-North" airport promoCers were really concerned about how to pay off that debt. There was some talk that if International Airport had to be closed, the debt would have to be placed on the taxpayers. Ms. Johnson stated that the expansion was being done in stages. The first stage was to extend the runway,at the current Anoka County Airport, 6,00� feet to the narth and 3,000 feet to the south. Nine thousand feet was a major runway. Ms. Johnson stated there was a need for general aviation airports, because International was very dangerous for small planes. What they should do was take the general aviation out of International, Ieave it at Anoka County, and Leave the jets at International because of the fancy xunways. Ms. Johnson stated that with a 9,000 foot runway, Anoka County would become a major airport right away. They were trying to attract the business jets and other jets to Anoka County. Tfiat way they would get the major airport at Anoka County. She felt this was a very urgent situation. Mr. Langenfeld thanked Ms, Johnson f.or coming to the meeting. EIQVIRORMENTAL QAAI.ITP COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBEIt 19, 1978 _- PAGE 3 Mr. Langenfeld and Mr. Peterson stated they would like copies of all the information. Mr. Peterson stated that the Commission members should study this material and invite Ms. Johnson back to the next meeting to help answer questions the Commission members might have so that the Commission would have a better idea of what was going on. Mr. Langenfeld stated that he was not surprised if a new approach was taking place regarding the airport. Ms. Metcalf stated they had several questions regarding the MnDOT Plan, and she did not feel the Commission should get excited about a possible threat of enlargement until they knew what the figures meant in the present plan. Was it possible to get those figures? Mr. Leelc stated that staff would be attending the public hearings on the final document. He had asked Mr. Boardman to also put together a staff position paper on the entire plan. Mr, Langenfeld suggested that the Commission quickly go through the "Proposed Position Paper". Undet "Issues of Concerns" dkl - Anoka Countv Airport (Jane's Field, Blaine - first paragraph: "Fridley's City Council has taken an official neutral position regarding the Anoka County Airport expansion, pending further information about the possible environmental impacts of such a move." Mr. Langenfeld stated he did not know the City Council`s position was neutral. Mr. Leek stated he had checked on that before writing it, and the City Council's reasoning was that there was not sufficient enough information for them to make a real judgment about it. Mr. Langenfeld stated that with the advent of this.new information from Ms. Johnson of possible concerns, he would like to have a citizen involved in this thing. Wou1d the Commission like to have someone from the Co�ission to be an official at any further hearings on the airport? He would hate to see this thing get past them. They had not gotten aay information from Mr. Clyde Moravetz, so they were really in the dark about what was happening. Mr. Leek stated that he thought another thing Mr. Langenfeld was pointing to was the fact that Mr. Moravetz had been appointed to attend officially called meetings--meetings called by either M.A.C, or Metropolitan Council-- and was not empowered to attend any other kinds of ineetings taking place regarding citizens� positions or otherwise on the Anoka County Airport. ENVIRONMENTN. QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 19, 1978 - PAGE 4 Mr. Langenfeld stated it was his basic concern to fill the gaps, such as the unofficial meetin�s, that staff would definitely not be attending. For right now, he suggested that if any Commission members became aware of an unisfficial meeting, they could theri try to get someone to attend, rather than delegating one member from the Co�ission. . Ms. Metcalf suggested that Ms. Johnson might even know of someone who could attend those kinds of ineetings. Under "Issues of Concerns" ��1 - Anoka County Airport - second paragraph: "The Fridley Environmental Quality Commission generally agrees with, and accepts that position, and wishes to pose several questions regarding the airport.° Ms. Metcalf stated she did not agree that the Commission should agree with the neutral position. � - Mr. Leek stated that what he was saying was that the Environmental Quality Cammission generally agreed with City Council in not making a judgment until they had further information about the impacts. Mr. Peterson stated he thought that should come across a little bit &tronger. In reading it, it came across initially that the Co�isszon was neutral, the City Council was neutral, and the Coum�ission agreed' with that. Mr. Leek stated that maybe it could be stated that: "The Environmen�al , Quality Commission opposed the upgrading of tfie Anoka County site to an intermediate airport unless the following questions could be satisfactorily answered." Ms. Metcalf stated they were concerned about the upgrading of the airport in view of the possibility of major expansion. Mr. Peterson stated that Ms. Virginia Schnabel had suggested to him that it might be wise and beneficial for the Environmental Quality Commission to have someone come before the Coam�ission who really did not have any direct relation with the MnDOT Plan or M.A.C., but who used the Anoka County Airport facilities as a pilot, for example, and who might know something about what was going on and how the airport served the people now. Mr. Langenfeld stated he would contact Ms. Schnabel and find out if he could get someone to come to the next meeting. Under Item B List of Deferred Proiects - second para�raph, the words "to buy" should be eliminated from the sentence. Mr. Peterson stated he would like to know wfiat a"key systems airport" was opposed to an "intermediate system airport". ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MECTING, SEPTENIIiER 19, 1978 - PAGE S Mr. Leek read the following definitions in answer to Mr. Peterson's question: [�Y SYSTEMS - Airports with a paved and 5 000 ft. in length, capable of accormno engine aircraft as well as most of the INTERMEDIATE SYSTEM - Airports with a p less than 5,000 ft, in length, capable single-engine and most twin-engine airc iet aircraft. ghted runway over in hea multi- porate jet fleet. d and lighted run accormnodating all t as well as some Under �{2, I-694 and Northtown Corridor River Crossings, Item B, P1ann Studies, first paragraph, the word "refers" was inserted in place of "makes reference". In the second paragraph, the words "in fact" were deleted from the sentence. Mr. Leek stated that in a con�+ersation with Mr. Boardman regarding this Posttion Paper, Mr. Boardman had felt it was too brief, and there were a 1ot more questions he would like to ask. Mr. Leek stated that this Position Paper was intended to give the Coum�ission sanething to work from and it was in no way intended to be a final document. He stated that if the Commission members had any further commenCs to add to the paper, they shouLd contact him before the next meeting so those comments could be included. Ms. Metcalf stated that in viewing this, she felt Ehat generally the Commission was not conscious enough of their status as an environmentally eoncerned commission. The Commission was talking about specifics such as: Was there going to be an airport? Were there going to be more super highways? But, she didn't really think the Commission had questioned the whole report on the basis of mass transportation and environmental concerns. Mr. Langenfeld stated he felt they should approve their position and then if they got "yes" answers to those questions, they would have definitely opened the door for environmental concerns. Ms. Metcalf stated she did not remember any mention of consideration of mass transportation in the Position Paper. It should be their �kl concern Mr. Langenfeld suggested that a general statement be made on the first page of the Position Paper that the Commission had a genuine and deep concern that the MnDOT P1an address the potential uses and impact of public mass transit. The Co�ission believed it was especially important in light of the increasing need to conserve energy. BY CONNIE METCALF Y�i 'i 1s V�� i i^S i I i ��): Lq K;�ic��7 NFE.LD ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 19, 1978 - PAGE 6 onnie MetcaLf seconded by Bruce Peterson, om the "MnDOT Plan - Position Paper" at the a voice vote, a11 vot 2. CONTINUED• INNSBRllCK NORTH SECOND ADDITION; WETLANDS: Mr. Langenfeld stated that at the last meeti�ng, he felt the Commission was getting aggressive and that the aggressiveness was putting some people on the defensive. He thought they had, perhaps, touched a sensitive issue, one which city staf.f had not had the opportunity to explore fully. Mr. Langenfeld stated he believed the involved agencies were trying to downgrade the importance of this issue, and he hoped the Environmental Quality Commission would continue to pursue it. But, he stated, he did not know what they could do now anyway. Mr. Leek stated he had checked with Mr. Dick Sobiech to find out what the status was on the wetlands in Innsbruck. At this point, the two lots that were put in moratorium were still in moratorium. After receiving the letter from.Mr. Joseph Alexander of the DNR, Mr. Messerli had gone out with a petition in the neighborhood regarding those we[lands. Mr. Leek believed tfie petition was to go directly to the DNR to halt the development of the wetlands. Mr. Leek did not know how f.ar Mr. Messerli had gotten with the petition. The only other thing Mr: Leek was aware of was the complaint from Mr. Erickson, the man who owned the "pole house", regarding more fill that had been dumped into a lot adjacent to his. The city's position at this point was that it was a matter betWeen Mr. Erickson and the person who owned that lot as to what was going on. He guessed Mr. Erickson and the developer were try,ing to work it out. . Mr. Langenfeld stated.that in regard to the wetlands, he would like to see Ehe Commission again stress the need for City Council to implesent the Interim Development Ordinance. He would also like the Commission to be aware of what was sti11 going on in Innsbruck and not call it quits. Mr. Leek stated that the Coumiission might want to inyite Mr. Messerli back to a Commission meeting to get an update on what he was doing and the strategy the residents were engaged in, because Mr. Leek felt it was important irrespective of what position the Commission took on the wetlands. Since the Commission had expressed concern to the residents of that area and did attempt to do something, they should maintain that contact, so that the residents knew that the Commission's concern was continual. Mr. Langenfeld stated that as a citizens' conmission, he was not too satisfied with how things were going on this. He would like to keep it moving. He would recommend that an invitation be given to Mr. Messerli so that Mr. Messerli could update the Commission and then the Co�ission couLd proceed from there. • ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSI �I MEETING, SEPTEMBER 19, 1978 ,- PAGE 7 MOTION by Bruce Peterson, seconded by Connie Metcalf, to continue discussion on the "Innsbruck North, Second Addition - Wetlands" at a 3. CONTINUED; ANIMAL PROTECTION ORDINANCE: Mr. %eek stated that he had not received a copy of Minneapolis'' animal ordinance, but he had talked to someone in the City Clerk's Office ahout it. Minneapolis had nothing in their dog and cat control ordinances which specifically related to animal protection. It was related to control mostly, the function of animal wardens, licensing, etc. Mr. Leek stated he would check with other sources. Mx. Langenfeld stated it was his position that perhaps they should add something to the existing animal ordinance, saying that it was unlawful to imprison any animal in a vehicle. Mr. Peterson stated he agreed that it did not need to be a separate ordinance. It could be a dual ordinance in regard to both control and protection. . Mr. I,eek asked the Commission if they would like him to obtain copies of the existing city animal ordinance for the next meeting? Ms, Metcalf stated she would like Mr. Langenfeld to treat this as a personal problem and take it directly to City Council. She did not think it exactly belonged with the Environmental quality Commission. Mr. Langenfeld stated it belonged with environmental in that the situation he had observed had involved the Environmental Officer and any number of indirect aspects. 4. CONTINUED: FIELD TRIP - WILLIAMSON HALL: Mr. Peterson suggested that Mr. Langenfeld contact Mr. Sabistina to see if anything had been done regarding a field trip to Y7i11iamson Hall. Mr. Peterson stated that if nothing had been done, he would be willing to do some calling as far as contacting the University to set up the field trip. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COt�LiSSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 19, 1978 - PAGE 8 5. CHAIRPERSON'S REPORT: A. Energy Project Committee: Mr. Langenfeld stated that the Planning Commission would Iike ail commission members to pass the word about the need for people to be on the Energy Project Committee. Resumes could be sent to Mr. Jerrold Boardman. 6. OTHER BUSINESS; A. Zonin : Mr. Langenfeld asked the Co�nission if they would like to go through the update of'the existing Zoning Code? The Co�ission agreed they would like to have the Zoning Code to review. B. Citizen Input to Inventory of Study Areas for Electric Power Plants: Mr. Langenfeld stated if the Co�ission members were interested in being included on the mailing list for notices regarding this inventory, they should complete and return the form attached to the letter from the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board dated August 8, 1978. C. Future Seminars: Ms, Metcalf stated there were public hearings on the "Water Quality Management Development Guide" on Wednesday, September 20, at the Metropolitan Council Chambers and Tuesday, September 26, in the Anoka County City Hall Community Roan. She would reco�end that the Coumission members try to go. Ms. Metcalf stated that there was a seminar entitled, "All About Water" to be held at the Salvation Army Camp on Sunday and Monday, September 24 and 25. Cost: $15. She stated she would like to attend this seminar. av the Minnesota Environme�lta eminar "All About Water", so voice vote, all votinQ aye, Ms. Metcalf stated that there was a seminar entitled, "Getting Our Act Together", a Clean Aiz Action conference sponsored by Ehe Metro CLean Air Committee at the Hennepin County Government Center on Thursday, September 28, from 2-9:30 p.m. Cost: $6.00 ENVIRONMENTAL qUALITY COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 19, 1478 - PAGE 9 ADJOURNMENT: Motion by Bruce Peterson, seconded by Connie Metcalf, to adjourn the meeting at 9:35 p.m. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Chairperson Langenfeld declared the September 19, 1978, Environmental Quality Commission meeting adjourned at 9:35 p.m, Respectfully submitted, C,f. � y � Saba Recording Secretary .