PL 05/21/1980 - 6681�
��
PLEASE AMEND AGENDA TO MAKE THIS ITEM 2
TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
The City Council was asked at their meeting of May 19th to renew the
Special Use Permit, SP #74-T6 for Reynold Swanson to operate a mobile
home sales lot, located on the West 375 feet of Lot 3, A.S. #89, the
same being 7151 Highway #65 N.E. They have asked the Planning
Coirmission to make a recommendation on this renewal.
_ _ ... _ .--- _ _ _ _
�
% e ri,sc, • i • i � �f �„ ��,
R./�/�.��4r.a.ti.. ia.
� i.
Ali Seasons Mobile Homes, Inc.
7151 HIGHWAY 65 N.E. $P #��}-�6
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432
TELEPHONE (612) 571•0070
April 21, 1980
The City Council
City of Fridley
6431 University Ave. N.E.
Fridley� tdinnesota 55432
Re: Special Use Permit
Gentlemen;
I am writing in regards to the special use permit
granted by you to operate a mobile home sales, owned by
me, at 7151 Highway #65 N.E. The existing permit expires
thie year and I am requestin� a renewal be granted for a
period o£ three (3) years. This time period will coincide
with m,y new lease, from June 26, 1980 through June 26�
1983� a copy oi which I have enclosed.
I have operated at this location for the past eight
(S) years. I think it has been managed in a business
like manner and has been an asset to your city. 2 wiZl
continue to own and operate it ii this permit renewal ia
granted. Your consideration is greatly appreciated.
If any other information is re.ouired or neceasary
please contact me at this office. Thank you for your
paet and future help. '
S cerely �
�i!��
Reynold E. Swanson
President
Sncl.
• -.s...
;;.
. ,
�it� o� �ri�lei�
ANOKA COUNTY
643t UN�VERSITY AVENUE NE
December 3l, 1974
560•3J50
FRIDLEY, MiNNESOTA 55432
Reynold E. Swanson
' 478 Rice Creek Blvd.
Fridley, Mn 55432 - `
Re: Special Use Permit, SP #74-16, for Mohile
- Home Sales Lot, 7151 Highway #65 N.E.
Dear'Mr. Swanson:
This is to notify you that the Fridley City Council at their
regular meeting on December 16, 1974, approved your request for a �
Specia} Use Permit, SP #74-16, for a Mobile Home Sales Lot to be
located at 7151 Highway 65 N.E., with the following stipulations:
OPERATQR ..
1. A Special Use Permit to operate a mobile home sales lot is
given only to Reynold E. Swanson as att individual and he wi1T
be the operator of the business. If the business changes hands
or he no Tonger is the majority owner and operator of the business,
the permit will be null and void, and would have to be reviewed
by the City Council before transfer.
OFFICE
1. The office trailer will be bYocked on concrete blocks and the
base will be skirted with aluminum. The office will be connected
to utilities; such as water, sewer, gas and electricity.
2. Two restrooms wi11 be installed in the office for the public's use.
3. The office trailer will be taxed as a permanent structure.
MOBILE HOMES
1. There will be no permanent residents in the mobile homes and no
repairing or storage of damaged trailers.
2. There will be a minimum of 10 feet of space between trailers.
LOT
1. The public and employee parking lot areas to be blacktopped by
October 1, 1975.
2. The area on the West side of the lot will have more rock and additional
_ _
. . �.�
�
� � Reynold E. Swanson
, SP #74-16, for Mobile Home Sales Lot, 7151 Highway N65 N.E.
December 31, 1974 Page Z
planting and no existing trees will be removed. Precast curb
will be put along the entrance and along the parking area for the
customers.
3. The land will be kept clean and free of a11 debris, junk, and
unsightly material and all green areas will be kept free of week5,
cut and well groomed.
4. There will be no washouts on the property due to surface drainage
and if there are any, these will be filled in and taken care of
imnediately.
LIGHTIN6 :
1. Adequate security lighting (a minimum of two lights at the East
end of the lot) will be installed for better observation by the police.
SIGNS
1. The existing sign will be used, but.ttrere will be no flashing or
feeling of motion in the light.
2. The Operator will comply with the requirements of the Sign Ordinance
regarding banners, pennants, etc.
PERMI7
1. This Special Use Permit be issued for a maximum of five years or to
run concurrently with the lease, which ever is less.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 560-3450.
DC/de
Sincerety,
DARREL CLARK
Comnunity Development Administrator
_ -- --_ _ .. _ _.___.. = ._�
t s �__f_ .Q�.v�,,,,�_ W. 375 f
� � Aud. Sub
� . .y i./.I3SrJ�If
� d a'92'Rt-
1 e �� : 0 ovs� � �
;� ' r i�o.a'
L aao.o•
(NJ/
i . � S�pi� A�niiici S/s/.w,,r/nr
T//./i. �
./
PC. �/ .
� I � �
�
sou
�iM +•JSl... —
i i� �
/aaJ
� � hi ' ��rttaG> Ocv�
} o ; C�. , r��c
I ntin� r
a � ,; �• �°�"�..�.�
� :7 �I � �' -,�._
, = O I �JKJ
� 4� � �� s�
c• �
��
� . .. � ti� �� i
� 3�` -�:�`is����
I �t
. . i s.Jn) .�
k - : ii.ni%e KN�r�r./ ��.
I �
t I' � .
-. 1 i ��- �. .
. . � � � � I e 7� �A�k'i
� � �� II
� + I
. �
�
1Y�_' � _ Y. ..i.. 1 .
' � 1. .. �B 4 .....
y ....
� `� , f1 i �
�
\
. of.Lot.3
�k 8 9 . �
.
<e�I
� r•
��
� ;s
I"
�� ass.•• �"�
��� , 2
�� --� 5���
� !s�f� �
r« /YOJ6N
.. . � /A O .../m!_ i�_
�� � ,
� t' � �� y—
��� IA��� J ��.
I .
�KS/6 // /6�/9'c0:1 � .�« '.
� ar
)flr�r�..��.���, .4��� ..
�,..�� j_ O �� i.) ..t:-�.r � �
. . "<' i��`7`r,l-.... '. .
1
,
�
' . . . . :.; �.
aow .
/%�idAerofd /n drtti°il/ � .
iiiifs/ai.�/iiiir,�r//ifweo '
� •
' e
z. „
�c
' Itio/
Ceorye H FRa:a � p .
� ��A K � "
�'o . n�a_�c �
�. '
�« Cee°)
{
-• s�:�� p�..... � .
a-ro+ jf (sis,f
/�
�����
:301
iw
i o � � �i = � . `, ` . ' �� � lfee) -.. ::.-i�o : _ .
�.` i `i ; u.� 3 � iPla �f�:df. .KO� � Pa•/!.! i92o� .
,( f
I 4 : � \ < �l : � � � S` � , � ✓O/A
� ���%'' �! `� ; fI �.^ � � � ` F i �E.aMI �Q
� i ' �i .
1h L r,y� ,
� .� ...�Jn� �Yli��\f'�J��' » 'y�{L•r y/SO I�y r.�� .
. C . _ ii^Q: .. .
(0001 fiose> ��f �io�o) � ��).. (.�r•+ i
� � �J �j :�ss
i�-: nie�°�:���
�
L
' �
L�
l,� .
� �
3;
^�
�� �
! '.
.�...,,Sp• o;� 7� •
�
2/)�OJ'
• IJS ._.. /f
�• r
. !
I
i
: 1
. 1�' .
B
1 `
� c Q � �.j.�'
�o-
r
5
(lG10}
Ii:�edfipr.itf� /.k.
�-._. -�'�'� �
p
t !
`` '
�.
yo
\.,. �
��� `���\
� .,-`� �, ;
�
.
t.^�i z.zr. .rm _ �
L.P.I.C_s.oa.o. __o-' .
L�P.�21�.00.0. ,
d O.OY'4ri ' � -
.
�
. �
.�
� �.
�
��
i
�
ca
47?t:S
'e j;
s
a;,F
ii'=
`t -
I� I
C tnn
��:.
�u� ; .::.
��
Y� •... .
A..� . . ' . . . _
` � . - . .� - �' . ,.
_ �. •
!4
. .� . .�� �. .
F , .
�
� .
=e
s;� I
vJ
�
���N
� �
:� � �
rY; � �
.; � � y
�
'' 9 ,�^� C+� ,
, t0
,
s �
: N
m �
t _ ��
's
�
� -•
�
I >e3g3s
,gQ.�,
�,�k��2
�
i � ; �
b i� i3�4
,.@ ^+ gag`R$�
:� ��g�-g
i��8���
./ �
�::
f
$. ?�lJ. o�an��c@ G�a., 9sic.
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
Novert�er 13, 1974
City of Fridley
Mayor and City Council
Gentlemen:
P6onef SUn�et 4•8221
9101 Hiway 65 N.E.
Fridley, Minneaota 55432
We have had, as you know, All Seasons Mobile Homes leasing my land
immediately North of our office building.for the past three years.
Mr. Swanson has asked me to continue leasing this lot to him as he
is mast desirous of keeping his business in Fridley at this location.
At the present time> I have no prospects for the building on this
lot and with the cost of financing as high as it presently is I don't
see anything developing very soon.
Mr. Swanson is a resident of Fridley, a member of the Chamber of
Commerce, and certainly has been a good tenant and a good neighbor.
I think he has done an excellent job of keeping his lot neai, clean
and attractive.
If the council would see fit to extend his permit, I.would be willing .
to continue leasing him this lot.
Yours truly,
Pi.�ff :1
Don Harstad
�
r
r �r
560-3450 �•s.
��¢� o�' `�'r��l��y
ANOKA COUNTY
6431 UNIVE.RSITY AYENUE NE FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55421
June 7, 1972
NOTICE
The City Council of the City of Fridley is meeting
on Monday, June 12, 1972 at 7:30 P.M. in the Council
Chambers of the City Hall for consideration of er.tending
the Speci.al Use Permit, SP 1172-07, for a Mobile Home Sales
lot by Reynold E. Swansor. to be located on the West 375
feet of Lot 3, Auditor`s Subdivision No. 89, subject to a
street and utility easement over the Westerly 40 feet
(generally located at 7151 Highway No. 65).
Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the
above matter may be heard at this time.
.,
FRANK G. LIEBL
MAYOR
�
i" _..
AGREEMENT FOR SP#72-07
� CONDITIONS TO OPERATE A MOBILE HOME SALES LOT AT 7151 T.H. H65 -
WEST 375 FEET OF LOT 3, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION N0. 89, PARCEL 710
-0PERATOR
1. Permit to operate a mobile home sales lot is given only to
Reynold E. Swanson as an individual and he will be the operator
of the business. If the business changes hands or he no longer
is sole owner and operator of the business, the permit will be
null and void.
OFFICE
1. The office trailer will be blocked on concrete blocks and the
base will be skirted with aluminum. The office will be connected
to utilities; such as, water, sewer, gas, and electricity.
' 2. Two restrooms will be installed in the office for the public's
use.
3. The office trailer to be taxed as a permanent structure.
MOBILE HOMES �
1. There will be no permanent residents in the mobile homes and
no repairing or storage of damaged trailers.
2. There will be a minimum of 10 feet of space between the trailers.
LOT
1. The entrance to the parking area to be blacktopped.
2. The area on the West side of the lot will have more rock and
additional planting and no existing trees will be removed.
Precast curb will be put along the entrance and along the parking
area for the customers.
3. The land will be kept clean and free of debris, junk, and
unsightly materials and all green areas will be kept free of
weeds, cut and well groomed.
4. There will be no washouts on the property due to surface
drainage and if there are any, these will be filled in and
taken care of immediately.
LIGHTING
1, Adequate security lighting (a minimum of 2 lights at the East
end of the lot) will be installed for better observation by
#he police.
�
_ _. _. , , �'!�
.
SIGNS
1. The existing sign.will be used, but there will be no flashing
or feeling of motion in the light.
2. The Operator will comply with the requirements of the �ign
Ordinance regarding banners, pennants, etc.
PERMIT
�
1. This permit will expire after 3 years, starting July 10, 1972
and subject to yearly review. The permit is not renewable.
IF ANY OF THE STIPULATIONS OF THIS PfiRMIT ARE VIOLATED THE CITY
WILL HAVE THE RIGHT TO REVOKE THE LICENSE.
i
`�=��a� � _ _ �L/I_—
i.�rrc�a., .
���` ���
TNESS
AGREED BY:
� �
REYN D E. SWANSON
August 14, 1972
�.;�
CITY OF FRIDLEY
AGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY, MAY 21, 1980
CALL TO ORDER:
R�LL CALL:
APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MAY 7, 1980
1. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #80-03,
DUANE hi0T2K0: Per Section 205,051, 2, A, of the Fridley City
Cade, to allow the construction of a second aceessory building,
a 22 ft. by 22 ft, detached garage for the storage of a boat
and car, located on Lots 45 and 46, Block 11, Spring Brook Park
Addition, the sambe being 290 Ely Street N.E.
2. RECEIVE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE FROM CITY OF SPRING LAKE PARK:
Rezoning and Special Use Permit to be used for the construction
of a 60 unit apartment complex for the elderly, generally
located in the vicinity of Terrace and Osborne Roads. Meeting
will be held May 27, 1980 at 7:30 P.M.
3. RECEIVE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: MAY 1, 1980
4.
5. RECEIYE APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: F1AY 13, 1980
6. CONTINUED: PROPOSED CHANGES TO CHAPTER 205. Z017ING
7. ATHER BUSINESS:
ADJOURNMENT:
7:30 P.M.
PAGES
1 - 10
11 - 17
18
SALMON
WHITE
YELLOW
SEPARATE
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COP'AIISSION MEETING, MAY 7, 1980
CAIL TO ORDER:
Chairman Harris called the May 7, 1980, Planning Cotsmiission meeting to order
at 7:38 p.m. .
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Mr. Harris, Ms. Schnabel, Mr. Langenfeld, Mr. Oquist,
Ms. Hughes, Mr. Wharton
Members Absent: Mr. Treuenfels
Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner
John Flora, Public Works Director
APPROVAL OF APRIL 23, 1980, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Mt. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Langenfeld, to approve the April 23, 1980,
Planning Commission minutes as written. Upon a voice vote, all vot3ng aye,
Chairman Harris declared the motion carried unanimously.
1. RECEIVE APRIL 15 1950 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONAff SSION MINUTSS:
MOTION by Mr. Langenfeld, seconded by Ms. Hughes, to receive the April 15, 1980,
Environmental Quality Co�ission minutes.
Mr. Langenfeld stated that at the Environmental Quality Commission meeting,
the Commission memhers were wondering if the City has taken any other position
on the Anoka County Airport since the City Cwncil Resolution 4�139-1977 on
Dec. 22, 1977. .
Mr. Boardman stated the City's position has primarily been a"wait and see"
status. They have just gotten the information that State Representative
Yaul McCarron tacked on a rider at the StaCe Legislature which pretty much
killed any further study on the Anoka County Airport. So, at this time,
unless Metropolitan Airports Commission takes it to court and gets that ruling
thrown out, the airport issue has been tabled.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. RECEIVE APRIL 16, 1980 PARKS &_RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Ms. Hughes, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to receive the April 16, 1980,
Parks & Recreation Commission minutes.
Ms, Aughes asked the Planning Co�ission members to note the motion made
by the Parks & Recreation Commission on page 14 regarding the Joint Powers
Agreement when the Joint Powers Agreement was discussed later in the meeting.
Mr. Harris stated the Co�ission would discuss the Joint Powers Agreement
under "Other Businesa",
�—ya
pLpNbIING COrII�ffSSION MEETING MAY 7 1980 PAGE 2
i3s, Hughes stateil the discussion by Tim Turnbull of the Fridley Poliee Depart-
ment on police calls to Locke Park was interesting. The main conclusion of
that discussion was thaC, while there were a number.of calls to Locke Park,
these were not huge numbers, and the Police Department probably does not think
of Locke Park as being a very serious area and one that demands consCant
control, even though a Neighborhood Crime Perception survey indicated that
the Locke Park area was an area peopie would most avoid because of fear of
crime.
Ms. Hughes stated the Co�ission will be talking about what �Cinds of security
or techniques might be used to improve the situation in Locke Park and what
they might ask other city departments to try to do.
UPON A VOICE VOTE; E1i.L VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
3. RECEIVE APRIL 22 1980, ENERGY COMf�ffSSION MINUTES:
MOTION bq Mr. Wharton, seconded by Ms. Schnabel, to receive the April 22, 1980,
Energy Commission minutes.
Ms. Hughes stated she woadered if people know about the kinds of energy materials
available at the Fridley Library. She tmew there caere supposed.to be some
energy materials at the library from a previous project.
�, Wharton stated the Energy Cou�issioa has not yet examined the library to
see what energy resources are available, but it is the intention of the
Coumnission to do that before the consideration of any dissemination of energy
information here at City Hall.
Ms. Hughes asked what the resolution was of the discussion about the City
Council adopting the Proposed Energy Policy. ,
Mr. Wharton stated that the Energy Commission would like to use the Energy
Policy as the document they cwld start working with. Before the Energy
Commission can do that, it must be adopted by City Council.
Mr, Boatdman stated that there is going to be a joint meeting between the
Citq Council and the Energy Co�ission, at which time the Energy Policy wi1l
be discussed. That meeting has not yet been scheduled, but hopefully it
will be scheduled this month.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CAAIRP7AN NARRIS DECI.ARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANiMOUSLY.
Mr. Langenfeld stated that on page 8, the Energy Commission made a motion
to City Council, through Planning Co�ission, reconmiending that Betty Enkhaus
and Dennis Anderson receive special recognition for their contributions to
the Energy Project Committee. He stated he would like to see the Planning
Commission concur with that motion.
PLAAINING COMMiSSION MEETING MAY 7 1980 PAGE 3
��� MOTION bv Ms. Hughes, seconaea by Mr. 1,angenLela
Coa�ission's motion and recommend Co City Counci
Dennis Anderson receive some type of recognition
hur_ions and ef£orts to the Enerev Proiect Couunit
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. RECEIVE APRIL 29, 1980, APPEALS COI�AffSSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Ms. Schnabel, seconded by Mr. Langenfeld, to receive the April 29, 1980,
Appeals Com�ission minutes.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, AI.L VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED
IINANIMOUSLY.
5. CONTINUED: PROPOSED CHANGES TO CHAPTEft 205. ZONING
MOTION by Mr. Langenfeld, seconded by Mr. Oquist, Co discuss the Proposed
Changes to Chapter 205. Zoning after "Other Bus3ness". Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Chairman Harris declared the motion carried unanimously.
6. 0'PHER BUSINESS:
A. Joint Powers Agreement
Mr. Boardman stated the Planning Commission had asked the City
Council to delay this item until their May 19th meeting. So,
there was no action taken by the City Council at their May Sth
meeting unCil they receive further informaCion and some acCion
from the Planning Commission.
Mr. Harris stated Chat Ms. Hughes was going to have some further
information for the Planning Commission at this meeting.
Ms. Hughes stated she did look at the title documents for Locke
Park, and there are no resCrictions within those documents on
the use of the property. It was purchased from the Douglas Chapel,
the heirs Co the Locke Estate, for $1.00. The one reservaCion
they had was that no intoxicating beverages be used in the park.
Ms. Hughes stated she also looked at the $50,000 expense report
made by the park supervisors. This $50,000 was an estimate only
for Locke Park expenses and did not include Islands of Peace
or any estimates for police protection. It was strictly for the
maintenance-upkeep kinds of costs for Locke Park. So, from that
standpoint, there are no restrictions, and if the County took over
the maintenance of Locke Park, there could be a savings to the City
of Fridley of as much as $50,000.
PLANNING CONS�SSION MEETING MAY 7 1980 PAGE 4
Ms. Rughes stated she could not locate any copies of any Park
Commissiott minutes from back in that era so there is no documenta-
tion in terms of whether there were any kinds of promises made to
the people on how that land would be used.
Ms, Hughes referred to the motion made by the Parks & Recreation
Coam�ission on page I4 of their April 16 minutes, in which the
Couenission recommended a number of changes to be considered by City
Council and City Administration, with the idea that the City
would come back with some kind of document for the Parks & Recreation
Co�nission's review. If the Planning Co�ission concurs with these
changes to the Soint Powers Agreement, she would recommend that the
Planning Commission ask that the Joint Powers Agreement be referred
back in its final form to the Parks � Recreation Co�ission and
the Planning Cammiss3on prior to final signiag and co�itments.
Mr. Harris asked Ms. Hughes what her feelings were on the Soint
Powers Agreement.
Ms. Hughes stated it was her personal feeling that they should not
go with a Joint Powers Agreement. She realized there ate not very
good argaments against what appears to be a big savings of $50,000
to the City and the kind of trust the park staff has with the County.
She stated she is basing her feelings on what she suspects some of
the old timers in the community are going to say and that is that
iocke Park is our park and the City is giving it away. She stated
it also removed the jurisdiction and the body to whom citizens could
camplain farther away fro� the citizens. She thought that was
important, partially because of the number of citizens bordering
the park.
Ms. Hughes stated another thing that bothers her is that the Couhty
is not going to be responsible for patrolling things that happen
in the park, except through whatever service the park ranger can
provide, and the park ranger's only resort in any kind of trouble
is to call the Fridley Police Department. That seemed to be a much
more important problem to deal with and one that wouldn't change at
all.
Ms. Hughes stated she views Locke Park as the cornerstone of the
park system and one the City ought to maintain complete control over.
She did not think $50,000 was that critical to the City.
Mr. Boardman stated he did not see the Joint Powers Agreement as
losing control of the park or losing the right of the people to
come to the City Council to complain or issue a complainb to get
action in the park, if action cannot get done at staff 1eve1. I£
they cannot get that kind of action from Anoka County, then with
one year's notice, the City fias the authority to take the park back
again.
PLANNiNG COMMISSION MEETING MAY 7, 1980 ____ __ PAGE 5
Ms, Hughes stated that one of the changes recommended by the Parks
& Recreation Commission was that the City and County have an annual
meeting in order to review, preview, and approve a11 plans, w ork
programs, and developments. It did not say "who" the City and County
was, and she did not want that to be just staff people. She wanted
it to be policy-making levels or at least advisory levels, such as
City Council, Board of County Co�fssioners, appropriate city staff
(Parks & Recreation Department, City Engineering, City Manager,
City Plauner, etc.) and city co�issions such as the Parks & Recreation.
Commission and the Environmental Quality Commission.
Mr. Oquist stated he did not know why the County would even want to
enter into an agreement with the City. The City was, more or less,
handing them a$50,000 maintenance bill and what benefit would it
be to the County? He asked if the County had been approached.as to
whether or not they are even willing to enter into an agreement of
this type before all the effort is spent on it?
Mr, Boardman stated that right now it has primarily been staff-to-
staff discussions. He stated he felt there has always been a certain
amount of concern by the City Council that not enough is being done
for Fridley. Although Fridley pays a majority of the tax base in
Anoka County, Fridley does not get the "benefit of the buck". He
stated that one of the things they are looking at is that the County
needs a trail system through Locke Park and the County has to have
some kind of agreement with the City for use of the area to run
the trail system through Locke Park.
Ms. Schnabel asked if it was possible to sign an agreement with the .
County that just allows the County to pay the City so mich for
maintenance? �
Mr. Boardman stated he did not think the County would ever pay the
City to maintain a city park. He stated this Joint Powers Agreement
has not. yet been brought to the County Board, and the County may not
even go along with this Joint Powers Agreement.
Ms. Hughes stated that they have to remember that $50,000 is what the
City says it will save. That does not say how much money the County
will put into maintenance. The clause they have in the Joint Powers
Agreement is that they have complete control over the times they
pick up the trash, the numbers of people and hours they spend at
Locke Park. It could be considerably less than the City has done.
Mr. Oquist stated he did not see anything wrong with the Joint
Powers Agreement as written and amended by the Parks & Recreation
Co�ission. He could not see the City losing anything, and the City
is gaining in the fact that they will not have to maintain the park,
and that maintenance, in terms of people-resource and money-resource,
can be used for the rest of the city's parks. The City could give
it a try for a year and could cancel in a year if it didn't work out.
PLANNiNG COPAfISSION MEETING MAY 7, 1980 PAGE 6
Mr. Flora stated that one thing the Planning Caaunission should also
consider is that if the County does maintain Locke Park, then it
becomes capable of getting additional funds for improvements above
and beyond the City's capabilities. .
Mr, Boardman stated they had to look at the fact that Locke Park
is a large piece of property that is tied in with a regional system,
and it does cost a lot in maintenance dollars. Why not tie that
park into the regional system if they have the opportunity to do
that? The City is still providing park facilities for the xesidents.
He'doubted if most of.the citizens would even notice the change, and
the change could even be for the better. The City's maintenance is
stretched pretty thin, and they have trouble maintaining the parks
they have now.
Ms. Hughes stated she has no problem with passing the Joint Powers
Agreement on and asking the City Council to enter into scme negotiations
with the County and see what happens.
Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Langen
il pursue the Joint Powers Agreeme
amendments made by the Parks & Rec
1980:
A. County Responsibilities:
1. To provide maintenance xoutinel
grounds, buildings and picnic s
2. To provide maintenance routinel
trails and uarkine lots.
4. To provide
concurrenc
Add- 10. The County
to review,
and develo
III, B. City Respo
Add- 4. The City a
to review,
and develo
Planning Coumiission
1. That in III.A.
defined as the
and appropriat
Recreation Com
2. That anv chang
City to have an
-iew, and approve
s.
lities:
Ld, to recoum�end that
as written with ihe
stion Couunission on
on a schedule of
Lters.
on a schedule of
control program in
tree inspector.
nual meetine fn order
County to have an annua7. meeting in order
eview and approve aZl plans, work programs,
nts.
so recommends the following stipulations:
and III.B.4 the "City" and "County" be
ty Council Board of County Commissioners,
ity commissions sueh as the Parks &
sion and the Enviro�ental Quality Coamiission
to the Joint Powers Agreement as written
6e broueht back to the PlanninQ Commission
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AyE, CHAIAMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANtMOUSLY.
PLANNN7NG COfII�ffSSION MEETING MAY 7 1980 PAGE 7
B, HUD-Section 202 Application by Spring Lake Park:
MOTION by Mr. Langenfeld, seconded by Ms. Schnabel, to receive
the HUD-Section 202 Application by Spring Lake Park.
Ms. Schnabel stated that in the applicatian, it states it is housing
for "elderly-handicapped", not elderly and handicapped. If that is
the case, is there going to be an age 3imitation in this bui2ding?
Mr. Boardman stated that Section 202 is a handicapped section.
They are required to have handicapped units, and handicapped units
are not discriminated against by age. However, if they cannot fill
those handicapped units, those units cannot be used for young people
ar families but must be used for the elderly. So, what is meant by
elderly-handicapped is that both elderly and handicapped people can
use these units under Section 202.
Ms. Schnabel stated she was a little disappointed in this project,
because there is a need for families to be housed where the head of
the household is handicapped. One and two-bedroom units do not
encompass families per se, and three bedrooms are more aecommodating
for families with a handicapped head of the household. ,
Mr. Boardman stated that the program for handicapped families is
more under the Section 8 new construction where so many units must
be set aside as handicapped units.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CAAIRMAN iIARRIS DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY:
C. Memo dated 5/6/80 from Mark Scott, Chairperson of A
C.nmmunir.ations Wnrkshou. re: °IIsin2 Cable TV ACCess
Communicating with the Fridley Community":
MOTION by Ms. Hughes, seconded by Mr. Langenfeld, to receive this
memo into the record and that this memo be referred to all Fridley
Co�ission members.
Mr. Harris stated the chairpersons should take this memo back to
their coum�issions for discussion.
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANINfOUSLY.
D. Election of Vice-Chairperson of Planning Co�i.ssion:
Mr.Harris declared the nominations open for vice-chairperson.
MOTION by Ms. Hughes, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to nominate
Ms. Schnabel for vice-chairperson of the Planning Co�ission.
PLANPIING COI�ffSSION MEETING MAY 7 1980 PAGE 8
MOTION by Ms. Hughes, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to close the
nominations and cast a white ballot for Ms. Schnabel for Vice-
Chairperson of the Planning Coumission.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN ilARRiS DECI,ARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY;
E. Discussion on Roles of City Staff and Planning Commission:
Ms. Schnabel stated she thought it would be a good idea for the
Planning Cammission to spend some time reviewing what their role
is as a Planning Cov�ission and what the role of staff is from the
City Manager's office on down through the various staff positions.
Co�:ents have been made periodically throughout the year about
various staft people and what their authoritative powers are, etc.,
and sane question about the Planning Commission's role. This
discussion could take place at some time in the future when the
Flanning Co�ission had a light agenda, and the City Manager should
be invited at that time to express his opinions.
M�TION by Ms. Schnabel, seconded by Mr. Oquist, that a discussion
on the roles of CiYy Staff and Planning Co�ission be put on a
future Planning Co�ission agenda.
Mr. Langenfeld stated it would pzobabiy be a good idea for the
Planning CoIInlission members to review their goals and objectives
on an individual basis prior to this discussion.
UP(�I A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN i1ARRIS DECLARED THE
MOTIOfI CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY:
Mr. Boardman stated he would check with the City Manager to what
timetable would be good for him and he would get back to the
Planning Cou�ission with a scheduled date for this discussion.
Chairman Harris declared a ten-minute break at 9:10 p.m.
7. CONTINUED: PROPOSED CHANGES TO CHAPTER 205. ZODT2NG:
MOTION by Mr. Langenfeld, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to limit discussion on
Chapter 205. Zoning to not later than 10;30 p.m. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Chairman Harris declared the motion carried unanimously.
R-3 District Regulations
205.095 Parking Requirements
Page 41 -
G-2. "10 feet" should be reduced back to "5" feet because of problems
with garages or second accessory buildings that are detached,
PLAATNING COI�ffSSION MEETING MAY 7, 1980 PAGE 9
Page 42 -
205.096 Performance Standards
3-A. Screening; In 8th line, "in view of fencing" should be changed to "in lieu
of fencing".
Pae43-
3-B-2: Ms. Schnabel stated she had problems with the City requiring how many
inches apart and how many feet high a planting screen has to be.
Mr. Harris stated that if they are going to require this much exterior
development, it is going to raise the price of a project which is
intended to provide "affordable housing".
Change to: "A planting screen shall consist of a closely grown hedge,
a row of Crees, evergreens, or other approved vegetation."
Delete 3-B-3 and change �4 to �3.
3-E: Change to; "Where any multiple dwelling district is adjacent to any
other residential district, there shall be a minimum
15 foot wide substantial planting area that shall be
planted to provide for a physical separation."
3-F: "All roof equipment, except solar collectors, must be screened from
public view unless the equipment is designed as an integral part of the .
building design and is compatihle with the lines of the building as
determined by the Zoning Administrator.".
Mr, Aarris stated it seemed that in the future, a lot of innovative energy
equipment is going to have to go on the roof. Someone has already been kicking
around the idea o£ wind generators, and the City makes no provisions for
that kind of installation. The City is going to have to start looking at
aiternative energy devices.
Mr, Wharton stated these were areas that should be looked at in reCrospect
through all various zone classifications--the solar rights which the Energy
Cou�ission is getting ready to look at and the wind generator idea, He would
suggest that the Energy Co�ission be charged with the responsibility of
making recoamiendation to the Planning Conmission on these various areas.
Ms. Schnabel stated that it may not be necessary to write some of Chis into
the Zoning Ordinance at this time, but could be handled through a variance
process or through an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance at a later time.
Mr. Harris stated that the Energy Commission, and any other commission that
wished to, should take a Look at these specific items. If the Energy Commission
or other commissions have any reco�endations, these reco�endations can be
passed on to the Planning Commission. In the meantime, the Planning Commission
will continue on with the Zoning Ordinance.
� yd
PLANNZNG COI�ASLSSION MEETING, MAY 7, 1980 PAGE 10
PaRe 44 -
7-A; Leave in first sentence only and delete the rest of the paragraph:
"Connection to a sanitary sewer is reqaired on each lot served by a sewer."
7-$; Delete: "provided the Zoning Administrator may approve other proposed
water supply, if determined necessary"
MOTION by Mr. Langenfeld, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to continue discussion on
Chapter 205. Zoning at another meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
•Chairman Harris declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Mr. Langenfeld, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to adjourn the meeting.
Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Chairman Harris declared the May 7, 1980,
Planning Commission meeting adjonrned at 10:50 p.m.
Respectfully su mitted,
�
L e Saba
Recording Secretary .
s
C'U(3LIC }IEIIRING
[3EPORE THE_
PLlINNINf C01iMISSION
11
Notice is hereby given that there Vrill be a Public Hearing of the
Planning Commission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6R31
University Avenue Northeast on 4lednesday, May_21; 19II0
in the Council C.ham6er at 7:30 P.t4. for the purpose of:
Consideration of a request for a Special Use
Pernit, SP ;lIID-03, by Duane Motzko, per Section
205.051, 2, A, of the Fridley:City Code, to
allow the construction of a second accessory •
building, a 22 ft. by 22 ft. detached garage, to
be used as storage for a boat and car, located
• on Lots 45 and 46, Block 11, Spring Brook Park
Addition, the same being 290 Ely Street N.E.
Any a»d all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity
at the above stated time and place.
PuUlish� hiay 7, 1980
hlay l �i , 1980
RICHARD N. HARR?S
CHN t Ri�fAN
PLAN�TIvG COPI�IISSION
' .�F�
�
CITY 01� FRTDLGY MINNf:SOTA
PLANNING AND ZONING 1�ORM
NUMBER �D-U3
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURF.C� S j(� `
?C+'�.)
Address �19D � 5'� � � - �. - �ri d u /)') �n�
Telephone Number %g(p_. 9`� Q
0
PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE
Address
12
TYPE OF REQUGST
Rezoning
� Special Use Permit
Approval of Premin-
inary $ Final Plat
Streets or Aliey
Vacations
� � Other
Telephone Number '��(o - 9 `� 8� ,,�
Fee�Receipt No, 993S�L_
Street Location of Property a 90 �; . . N�•��j oy�
Legal Description af Property 1-�5 �{5 a- �lo �j�k Il 5 vi r� �o-aok Ycuk
Present Zoning Classification Existing Use of Property �s;C�Qn� a�
Acreage of Property 6 O X�4 c}� Describe briefly the proposed zoning classificai:ion
or type of use and improvement proposed S.�cun�. Qe�Ags�y ��,; ((; �o
f �_
CG���a � a.� X a a C STOtaRn -�ov .boa�" Q�n� Cav�
Has the present applicant previously sought to rezone, plat, obtain a lot split or
variance or special use permit on the subject site or part of it? yes_�_no.
iYhat was requested and when?
The undersigned understands that: (a) a list of all residents and oi,mers of property
taithin 300 feeL (350 feet for rezoning) must be attached to this application.
(b) This application must he signed by all o�vners of the property, or an explanation
given why this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any defect in the proceedings
resulting from the failure to list the names and addresses o£ all residents and
property oti,mers of property in question, belongs to the vndersigned.
A sketch of proposed property and structure must be dra�,m and attached, sho�aing the
following; 1. North Direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on the lot.
3.. Dimensions of property, proposed structure, and front and side setbacks.
4. Street Names. 5. Location and use of adjacent existing buildings (�aithin 300 feet}.
The undersigned hereby declares that all tlie facts and representations stated in this
application are true and correct.
DA'CE ��— � 1^ ga SIGNATURE p�
(AYPLICANT)
Date Filed Date of Hear.ing ;rj-'�-/—��
Planning Commission Approved City Council Approved
(dates) Denied (dates) Denied
Planning Commission May 6, 1980
City Counci
Mailing List
SP �80-03 Duane Motzko
2nd accessory buildin9 290 Ely Street N.E.
Rottlund Company
1591 Rice Creek Road
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Lawrence Coulter
8008 Ruth Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
hir. & Mrs. Jerry Hanson
299 Liberty Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Warren Stock
289 Liberty Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
t4r. & Mrs. James Norn, Jr.
279 Liberty Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Daniel Rydbom
269 Liberty Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Donald Budzeak
259 Liberty Street N.E.
Ffridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. James Kukowski
249 Liberty Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Howard Walters
262 Ely Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Eugene Erickson
264 Ely Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth Brustad
272 Ely Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Robert Scheel
280 Ely Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Duane Motzko
290 Ely Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Ms. Cheryl Klatt
298 Ely Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Marvin Breiland
295 Ely Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Mykola Maroz
289 Ely Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Russell Schlemmer
281 Ely Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Robert Freeman
273 Ely Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55�32
Mr. & Mrs. Curtis Walberg
265 Ely Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Arthur hbntour
261 Ely Street N.E.
fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. Patrick Bauer
251 Ely Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. James Klipstein
303 Liberty Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Mr. & Mrs. James Olmcheid
301 Liberty Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
Check You & Karen �wan
8002 Ruth Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 550.32
15
Kent G. Pierce
8020 Ruth Street N.E.
Fridley, Mn 55432
, �...
�� y ����
•, � ��
,- --- --
, . . . __. __.. . .. ._'_'
� , �.i�.' __�.�_. - ... .._.
- � --
. , � ._ . .. . : /;- -�. I _�> j � ! / �.'_ iC.
i���. (./4i ia.il � . . .
. . ..���/• w � r� �
UUMG PIlONE: ��- •� ' � � __I
�; ,1• � -: 14
_ ._ � _ ous. ri�orve: _
.: ��'� ,�,1�� c�~
.i.���.��ont�s_ ���-�—'-���� � _
�il.!'l ..'Ut.`.^��e__._��'.�_� +..�— .! .. � . x+1����.�.
` j � �1 __-.�_.CONTRPj'i DATE_ F. SIZE � '� �� � �•
..�.LC,,vv1;1--... _.
+
.. .�__..__ . ,
. _ �:. .. .. —_..— _ _. ... ... . .�, �x����. .;_,.�.�.. y..
� � - Slab ._. . .
� .� . -. �lY. _'___ _. _ _
n�u --- —
� � .. 'iSOid' � ;,.,� v
. L-�:noval—.
. . ' __'_"_ . � � FiH__�
- �.. . _._ _—__._ �
i
. ..._._._ . _.. . I .
. �._ __._._._ - . ._ .__._
__ � I;__ •
� ' -�
r __ ;1
� , t.�= � : � •
. ...:..- — � �.. -y'
�� �
��; "� � � 4
_. . . __ ri . D.W. .
, .. oiks.: :v ...___ __ .— _ s.w. _
�_ Watci; ' ..._ ... '___�'_ — FIg' _
.. _ . _ _.._._ Nack f� . ._._ __.._ _ Re-baf
qtl�er_ _ .
.. . _. _ .. .__—_ .. _._.. _. _ . .
_.... ._._•, __._._....
�' .
�, , , : ; /�
. ' � „f . ; ,. j ilr6 � 0 Sg�
., ��iy � . ; .
� �
� � - � � - i . � � . ,5-`! l.P_ � W.R.
'
._�;. f 2ZV2Z
�,,:.� , n:t.-
. �
i c �,.: :.
� � ; � � �., r rr , , ,..
� � � i, -: � �,�t '
_ 1 � •
. . � ' � s--. � � : . _ ` li; .:. , � �-�
� � . r...
'�
TOTAL
i ' -- �
��. � ���
!. '�:'
, t��
i_
� I
i��`
1 i �� � ' �
� V' � i
f� �
i�� .�
.�
! . . ! ;
—�---- .__._—..
i : . .
f.. �
� +
;� '�
�
,;
- - ___�__.
j_�_ ; � :
i ; j;
I '�.��i
��
{ �?.'
,
_
; � ,- �-;
� ;� �
�
l�j;' j�
i _ '_. ..-__'_.
��
I I
_ �� '.— " -
�!
; " .
, � �.�'
:
�;;
, , -- -__
`, i . �
i ,
li' j
� , _ __ _._ . � : ;
� , , ., ; ,
, _ . _._ _ ._.. _.. __ • -• ____.-_3a � -- -
_ _ _.._
._.�3��
..._; ._ - _ _ .. _ _..
I!
, , , ;,,
� ,
_ �.
,
, ;
; i. ,
� � �
�;
1
� � � �r-�; Q r �3a o��
r ` ���
�
;
� f �.� S�
i ' il r� �
�'�,� i � ; . �
\' � .
�
�
--------; - - -
: �
rt/r�,, � � _ �,'.i
f. �
, , � -: ,
! _._'_
� �
' � .•�
!� .7
�_�:_.-_.—(V
UIH! CI1(1N
land Vlonning /� � . . 6875 Ni bww No.63 N.F,
��f�^%�'�-/�.r�� 9 Y
lund Su�voying �� • � �, � �, Minnoapolis�
so�i, r..�;,,9 9l/�(/!((!fll�j r�7/C• Minn. 55473
❑vilfnginecAng . Telaphonn 786-6066
MvnicfpeM1 Engince��ng � EI1g�110BT6 BL SLLTVOj�OP9 Area Code 617
Mortgage Loan Survey for T� �- CO BU ������
��o ��Y STR��T
60.00
.� � '
N I
N
FI �
LJ.`.1 �
��0�� . . . � P
�
Pi r
�'?� ^ <(
G '
'� nl'.CQfP1:lPtlt
J
d- �I!' �j/
� �ca.
4 3.4E+
I
i �1 � �
'./ i �
�y_ ���
f �3 � C J.
i y
F._ H,
:.` i
�-
`�. I � .
� �/
_�J � I
�J
V y.l� l�
�OTS 45 �.46 Bl�OGI� I 1
i
il
<r
�'k �, .c .e.
' V
Scale:l inch= 40�eet
SPRIN� BROC��. PARI�
ANOKA Court�'Y
This is o frue ond cmro<f �eprasenlqNon of a survey of Ihe boundariof of the Innd obove desaribed and o/ thc
IocoHon o1 wll buildinge� i/ any� Ihercon� and all vi�ib�e enc�oaahmenls� i} nny� from or on said Iand. Ihis survey is
made only {� aonnetfion wifh a mortgage loan now baing plo�ed on Ihc proper�y and no liability is assumed
raaept fo 1he holder oi such mortgugo or any other interes� aaquired by the �po�on oF soch mortgoge, II is
underslood ond oyrovd no mo�wnenls hyve 6eon plu<ed for iho pyrposo oF ostu6lishing lo! lines or bouwdnry
aornen, Oal�d �hie��doy of �;ia.: � q,0. 19�. � .
SU6URBAN ENGINEERING,INC. �
Enqinear �; Surve or}
� bY ' . (,, i � 1 ,�.� -�.� . (�,.,_, . �
!
15•
.. . . '�
I �./
� t /
' �r _. . .��:
_�_ . ..y .Y..
�,� ��;
,- .
_ ;
, ,
: ; "� ;�
���'� ; f'i
;r, � I�ril E3, 19II0
,'t % � ;'%
_ ��; �,
`i v
�.I
�.�
� �j
+�+',.u' n,�'o h �7""1
c.�,a �� �� �::�� u��=s;�;.�R.�:..�..: : ;��
G431 UF7IVERSI7Y AVi:NUE F7.E., FRIULEY, NIhMESOTA 55432
� � � Mr. Rick Y.uhl
�r�J Sussel Company
� J� 1350 Cono Avenue
,': ; St. Pau1, t1N 55108
Re: Proposed Garage at 290 �ly Street N.E.
Dear Mr. Kuhl:
TEL[P11P�fE (612)571•3450
We received in the mail this raornin� an application for a b:iildin�
permit to construct a detached garage at 29Q Ely Street N.E. The
City can not issued this permit until one of two options ks approved;
1. Apply for and obtain approval for a second accessory
building through the City's Special Use Pernit procedure.
(The application fee is $30.00)
2, Convert tlie existirig attached garage to living quarters,
hoivever, beFore �+e could permit this, a variance �oould
have to be approved for having living area 5.5 feet from
a side lot line instead of the rc�uired 10 feet.
(The application fee is $50.00)
Tf the owner wants to still pursue the construction of this detached
garage, the owner can apply for one of the two options listed above
by applying at City Aall.
If;you or the otaner has any questions on thi.s matter, please watact
me at 571-3450.
Sincerely,
/ t
A �L G. CLF�Rh
Chief IIuilding Ofiicial
DGC/mh
CC: t9r. Duane htatzko
290 Bly Street N.T.
16
w�. . . ..;s:,1 :, „ ,.
. , .t..<..». �.,
r , , , ,.
. �. � � _ . . ,
� -, � � _, ` . : ; 17
� SP NIIO-03,, Duane {�lotzko
290 Ely Street N.E
- 2nd Accessory building
� r: �
� . � � i r� . y . Y .,
��� .. � . \ J��..
� .\�'� '.: . ".: .� '.�-. .
rY�xi 1 °J 'B3S —�?o o' „e.... � I '-_ . � .,' i ,'`r e; ... � �.cz' t�— \'' J.� �II
,}.n 16.ac s i
. a
zR; 3 ` 1- '..} 2 l 2 � { ^ !: i � � �� �\ I
, `�� /5� � ...':3 � � t�J [ 2 3 4 S it � �:e 9�u ii v ia'a ��I,/6 /7 /B /9 I / �a%ZO � � Z 3 4 S `' �. �e ^ 9, °-
- 5� Sz o A Q. t `! 1 .. '.I �i� ; � .� = � .�-..-- ti �'�� p f
,�:v � ..�o � -; i � I ' 2�3 2�3 ' I - I8,1 1161
/f '_�,�+� h. �� ' � 2 5 2�9 2 1 ` 265 i . I . � ,, a _ �, . .,
w , f : i
ri `{'�jC
�� 'lt. ��,. f s ' �x ` • � - . - y_�� � r . �;-�1!\G
�_ ..-. <�d : ..�� �, EL :_ ., -. ` -- ,. _ . .. _ _ ..�30 ,
%
€�
'`„r;t :.
>.
_6.'a <.
i�
,�...: _. ..
` ,� � t �
�jy g ��6,35'L3i32 /3�
Z 2�4 2�a2 248 23& 2�8 2�
i
� � �•I
?! 2 3 �4 5� 6 7 �+ 5�� //
�..17c�vN� �r-•i-
22 3!� ic
Z f s Z
9 2i9 2�5 - 2!5
���
��
Y � 4tl7 2',7 �" '
� ' - � ,�;Q f� ��slze9'274I' � � � �_, ,_,�'j„ . . _i. _ _;���4�1 i�.i••� i �-�-�-�-�.�-.�•
�'�" " =STREET
� •- , .e-�... ,.v - . , 4 _ . � � . o
j �y� . - - W v , . .. -
� �� " � . _ `gsa 2&eo �g 260 , 4 248 2362 2 2o4�a1' � 2 "' .
-:i .'� . � -�� . 1: .a� � i z;/,' t39'a`t?�7'.
� \, � �x p 3�-- . f l-z�/ S 4s ?�! c�45 r�3 =,Ui/ c�39 8 �.— _,. 3P�i . �. f
\\ �. �:�:. ..i. : � � :-! i �..'.I . ! ; �' 20 �. 19 . 1 0� 110 I O 1 p .
. � �� I . � i . - N � .
��"' S/�-e'.. ^ . fc: .�.. ..3a' 3�' "�.. 1�
� ���'�' _ - 6�'1969 � � � - - , .. .
--�- ao3 . I ;. : i . 20\ -.��_!' � �.� : :.�
. .e F.:I/.y
..�rr' o.� ) .
�i
♦
'� �:
� � �3� `
�T �:,
�
�
��
� ;'����I�� �f°�'��b..lta9�'-I-�_�_�,:�.�:
� ° . -STREEi
,p s:
,ra�- -i �..:
:
z-, , : -r�� �,��
a��6- 14�0 l�6 16 IS4� �r�J 13'��
ti , (_ I ♦.{_, _ I R
�%,_�• � ;• 1�/ �I ; .
I. . t . . I,:-
_J_� i • i._�
i - -�! '.. 4 � J.
4`�' � �. �� :`
� 2 R
;'
i �
.
` .+. z � u , �. � �' �°
d` .. .. . � _ L' ��
3 .
CITY OF SPRING LAKE PAT�iC
o�zc�, rum.zcr�zoN
Public Hearirig.befoze the City Pl�mis�g �d Zoning Ca�mission�
To Wnom It T"ay Cancesn:
� �� � is
Notice is hereby giv� that there w�ill be a Public He.ai�ng of the
Plarming �d Zoning Cmrnission of the City of Spring Lake Park in
the Spring Ial:e Park Ccn;�rn�u.ty C�ter at 1301 - 81st Avenue N.E.
on HAY 27 29 80 , in the Coimcil Cl�ess at
7_30 ., to cansi t e o 1Q�aing m3fter.
Property Owner: Partnership of Three
ppplicant . Osborne Apartnents, Mr. Jim Stowe
Location . In the vicinity of Terrace and Osborne P,oads
Pefition . Split parcel 8450 to rezone portion split off and a
special use to construct G0 unit apartment complex for the
elderly. The property is legally described as Part of Outlot
1, Nan Don First Addition, Plat 95072, Parcel 8450.
[�ny and all perscros . desising to be heard shall be given � wportzmity
at the abwe stated time �d place.
���'������t
B. B,� .
City Clerk-?Yeastses
Publish . May 16", 1980 __
,
r
-,�
HOUSI.`!G & REDEVELOPMENT AUTAORITY
MEETING
MAY 8, 1980
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Coum�ers called the May 8, 1980, Housing & Redevelopment Authority
meeting to order at 7:40 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Larry Cou�ers, Russell Houck, Elmars Prieditis,
Carolyn Svendsen, Duane Prairie
Members Absent: None
Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner
Mary Cayan, Human'Services Assistant & Housing Specialist
Dick Harris, Chairman of Planning Co�ission
Mark Haggert'y, representing Joint Venture Developers (JVD)
APPROVAL OF APRIL 10 1980 HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MTNUTES:
MOTION by Ms. Svendsen, seconded by Mr. Prieditis, to approve the April 10, 1980,
Housing & Redevelopment Authority minutes as written. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Chairperson Co�ers declared the motion carried unanimously.
1. CENTER CITY REDEVELOPMENT
A. Mark Haggerty - Representing J.V.D.
Mr. Boardman stated that he and Mr. Doyscher had a meeting with
Mr. Haggerty about three weeks ago. At that time, they thoughG it
would be a good idea for Mr. Haggerty to come before the Auehority
to let the Authority know where JVD is at on the project and how long
it will take them before they can present anything to the Authority.
Mr. Haggerty stated that a couple of things have occurred this
week that seem negative, but may turn out to be positive. He sCated
they have had a real estate firm contacting potential major tenants
in the area, and they thought they were making good headway wiCh
Medtronics and Onan Corporation. On Tuesday of this week, he received
Che information that, apparently, Medtronics has decided to build a
building on their site, and Onan has agreed to rent office space from
Medtronics. That means tney will not be primary tenants in JVD's
building.
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUT1i0RITY MEETII�TG MAY 8 1980 PAGE 2
Mr. Haggerty stated that the rest of the market has been very
soft. The feedback they have gotten back from the smaller tenants
is that they don't want to move on what they see as a pending or
actual recession.
Mr. Haggerty stated he had a meeting with his partners to discuss
this very issue, They have been informed by their financial people
that they can float $1,400,000 in tax exempt mortgage money. At
that price range, they are looking at 30-40,000 sq. ft. of office
building. He has discovered that the only way to get tenants in
this area is to have the building half constructed and then people
will believe there is actually going to be a building. There have
been so many false starts in the community that the smaller tenants
have had bad experiences and don't want to commit themselves to
anything until they actually see something in the ground.
Mr. Haggerty stated that if the City is willing to go with JVD,
assuming they don't get any more commitments (they have commitments
for about 4,500 sq, ft. of office space) by the end of the month,
JVD as a group is still willing to put up a nice building and build
it in such a way as to allow another tandem building alongside of it.
Mr. Haggerty stated he has been informed that there is a large
corporation, apparently not local, that wants to build an 80,000
sq. ft. office building in the Fridley/northern suburbs area, that
this corporation is taking bids for construction of the building on
May 21st, will be looking seriously for sites after May 21st, and
will make a decision by the middle to end of June. This corporatioe
would use the entire building themselves with no rental space.
He stated that Miller-Schroeder has said that they could run two
municipal tax exempt mortgages side by side, having two buildings
going up at the same time, one primarily for outside rental and one
by this corporation. He stated this was very speculative, He had
just heard about this and had not yet discussed it with Mr. Boardman.
Mr. Co�ers asked about the status of Smiley-Glotter as part of
JVD:
Mr. Haggerty stated that with the feedback they have received on
what they can rent the building space for, they realize they cannot
afford $150,000 for architects. So, they will probably be using
plans that have been used before in order to keep the square footage
cost down aroand $40-45/sq, ft., plus tenant improvements, Smiley-
Glotter would probably stay in the projecC, but rather than having
a third ownership, they would have a lesser ownership and would not
be doing as much work. Mr. Haggerty stated they would be economizing
in all areas and still have a very nicely landscaped and attractive
building, but they have to keep the costs down.
-�w..,�.
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTAORITY MEETING MAY 8 1980 PAGE 3
Mr. Haggerty stated that if the City thought this was feasible,
Miller-Schroeder would like to come in and get a pmliminary
resolution through as quickly as possible. If the City decided to
go with this building, JVD would be able to give the City same
specific design plans on the first of June.
Mr. Commers stated that the way the Authority looked aC it was they
selected JVD as the developer and, at this point, the agreement is
that JVD has until July lst to present the Authority with whatever
proposal they feel they can satisfactorily go with. If there is
going to be some changes in the type of program JVD is looking at,
he thought JVD will have to put those changes into some kind of
document for the Authority to look at carefully, and the Authority
can either verify or not verify how it would work out for the City.
Mr. Haggerty stated they would put together the numbers with the
proposed building plan with what they feel they can go with under
the circumstances and would get those to Jerry Boardman as soon as
possible.
Mr. Co�ers stated that when they receive that proposal, the Authority
will probably call a special meeting in order to review it with staff
before JVD comes in to meet with the Authority.
Mr. Ha'rris stated he agreed with Mr. Haggerty that the market is
tight, but he did believe things are going to improve. He hoped
the swing back up is gradual and not rapid. From all indications
he is getting from suppliers and contacts in the building industry,
huilding costs next year could be 2d'1 higher. If anything is started
this year, it will be an advantage to the project.
Mr. Commers asked Mr. Harris if he had any idea what risk the
developer could take with square footage in a building without
tenant coum�itments.
Mr. Harris stated that he thought- 40,000 sq. ft. would be able
to go, because they have to create the activity,,with provision
to build maybe another 30,000 sq, ft. on top of that 40,000 sq. ft,
Mr. Haggerty asked if they would prefer to see a building where
floors could be added on or would they rather see another tandem
building alongside the first building?
Mr. Soardman stated the thing they would have to look at and would
need to know was how Che parking would be handled. The more square
footage you can go up, the more available property you have for
parking. Parking is going to be the problem.
Mr. Haggerty stated he would stay in touch with Mr. Boardman and
wouLd try to keep the City informed of JVD's progress each week.
HOUSING & REDF.VELOPMENT AUTHORITY MGETING MAY 8 1980 PAGE 4
B. Receive Memo from Virgil Herrick dated April 23, 1980
Mr. Cou�ers asked Mr. Haggerty to review this memo and if he had
any comments, he should let the Authority know.
Mr. Commers declared the Memo from Virgil Herrick dated 4/23/80
regarding JVD Conflict of Interest received into the record.
C. Dpdate on Over-all;
Mr. Boardman stated he has just talked to IMt (International Multi-
Housing, Inc.), and they are still very interested in the commercial
development across University. They are getting L-o the point right
now where they are working out agreements for taking an option on
Fred Levy's property. Probably within the next week or so, IMI
will have option on Levy's property,
Mr. Boardman stated they have told TMI in the meetings that the
City does not want to discuss anything until IMI shows they are
very serious about the project and after IMi has acquired the options.
Mr. Boardman stated he and Mr. Doyscher are following this thing
very closely. They have told IMI just how quickly the City can move,
which is net very quickly. First of all, once the options are
acquired, IMI will have to come in with a plan and figures, and
the Authority and staff wi11 have to go through the same process
they did with JVD. It is a very lengthy time period; however, IMI
is still very interested in that property.
D. Memo �680-32 to the
Re: Action to Ac�
Comes up for Sale•
HRA from Jerrold Boardman dated A
r in the Center Cit�
I 22, 198
ect as it
Mr. Boardman stated he wanted to get some direction from the
Authority on acquiring the Standard Oi1 Station across Uuiversity.
The property is pxesently vacant, and if it is uacant when they
acquire the property, there are no relocation costs. Relocation
costs run approximately $10,000 for commercial. With the Standard
Oil Station, there is also the potentiai of IMI developing over
there.
Mr. Boardman stated he has tallced to representatives from Standard
Oi1, and they have the property for sale for $85,000, The City
would still have to go through the same process for acquisition,
which is quite a lengthy process. Standard Oil will be holding that
property no longer than six months before either leasing or selling
the property.
Mr. Boardman stated he had talked to the League of Cities to see
how this would affect the City of Fridley if the City acquired that
property. How it affects the cicy of Pridley or how it affects
the Authority is that once the Authority acquired the property,
HOUSING & REDEVCL�PMENT AUTHORITY NIEETZNG MAY 8 1980 PAGE S
the assessed values, taxes, etc., go to zero. The Authority
does not have to make that drop of assessed values to the County,
City, or to the School District; however, it does drop the taxes
to those districts.
Mr. Boardman stated he wanted the Authority to have this informa-
tion. He would like to get a better indication from IMI, especially
if IMI is going to be signing options within the next week, then
he thought the HRA would be in a stronger posiCion with the City
Council as far as acq,uisition.
Mr. Boardman stated that if the Authority has a special meeting in
,7une, maybe they could take some action on this at that time.
S. Memo dated May 5, 1980, from Marvin Brunsell to City Manager
Re: Dick's Auto Parts/Christenson Building:
Mr. Boardman stated that in the memo, Mr. Brunsell had asked if
it was possible to waive any right of moving expenses. Mr. Boardman
stated he has checked into it. The StaCe uses HUD regulations on
relocation benefits, and HUD has a standard waiver form, and a tenant
can waive the right to any future moving expenses. If Mr. Brunsell
does rent any more space in the Christenson Building, then they will
have the renters sign this waiver. The City is now getting to the
point where they will be taking buildings down at any time.
Mr. Commers stated that the Authority could make a motion that
any additional rental space in the Christenson Building he only
on the condition that tenants waive the right to relocation expenses.
Mr. Boardman stated that Dick's Auto Parts is planning on renting
this space until February, He stated he thought the Authority should
make the City aware that Chere is the potential of splitting that
property for development and any long term lease or lease until
February could hamper activities. He would recommend that any
rental space be rented on a month-by-month basis.
Mr. Houck, seconded by Mr. Prairie, to recommend that the
snace in the Christenson Buildine on a month-bv-month
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNqNIMOUSLY.
2.. REHAB PROGRAM:
A. Infoxmation on Rehab Program - Presentation
Mr. Boardman stated that at the last meeting, the Authority requested
information on the block grant application, what programs the City
was getting invoived in, and how far along they were with those
programs. The Authority had received this packet of information with
their agenda, plus he had brought along some slides to give the
„ Authority some idea of the rehaUs that have taken place.
_�
HOUSING & REDSVELOPMENT AVffIORITY MGETING MAY 8 1480 PAGE 6
Mr. Boardman stated this block grant program was primarily set up
for a sma11 neighborhood, and this was the Hyde Park area. The
City sought out $130,000 in grant monies and received $140,000.
They broke this down into $93,000 for rehab, $21,000 for administra-
tion, about $25,000 into the Housing Maintenance Code, and $5,000
went to the Fridley Library to establish a Housing Resource Center.
Mr, Boardman stated that under the grant program, they have presently
done 13 grants and one is still working on a house. Those grants
are primarily completed, except for the one. The City presently has
approximately $30-31,000 left over, so they have opened it up again
for more rehabs. They have gotten six more applications to take up
the rest of the money. They hope that within a month to a month and
a-half, they will be letting out contracts for the rest of the rehabs.
Mr. Boardman stated that with the maintenance program, a Housing
Maintenance Code was developed and is presently being operated in the
Hyde Park area. They are charging off a11 costs to operate the rehab
program in that area to this maintenance program. They have inspected
all the apartment units within the Hyde Park area, and any violations
to the Housing Maintenance Code have been brought up to code. They
have gone through an extensive enforcement program.
3. LARGE FAMILY HOME OWNGRSHIP PROGRAM:
A. Update on Program
Mr. Boardman referred to memo f680-37 dated 5/2/80 from Mary Cayan
to Jerrold Boardman, re: Acquisition of the Marler Property, 5738 -
7th St. N.E. Mr, Boardman stated this appraisal came in at $47,900.
Mra. Marler did not necessarily want to sell to the HRA, and the HRA
did not �oant to purchase the property for that price. Staff sent
her a letter of its decision not to purchase. So, the Cit;� g�aff
out again Iooking at other properties. Two of these properties are
1632 Rice Creek Rd. and 1358 Mississippi St.
Mr. Boardman stated that if it is alright with the Authority, they
would start talking to the owners of Chese properties, and if either
of the properties looks interesting, the HRA wdii go ahead and get
appraisals. In figuring costs, they have around $52-54,000 left in
the program, If they can, they will try to purchasing something in
that range that will give them a couple more 1ots. If they cannot,
they may have to look at lots with no structures.
The Authority concurred with the stafE looking at these properties,
B. Surveys
Mr, Boardman stated that at the last meeting, he had asked for approval
from the Authority to do surveys for the lot splits on 5832 University
Ave, and 6025 - 3rd St. N.E. at about $400 in cost. When they started
. . . . „"�'°!�
HOUSING & R�DEV�LOPMENT AUTHOHITY MEETING MAY 8, 1980 PAGE 7
C.
looking into it, they discovered the $400 would only cover a survey
of the outer limits of the properL-y. The City really does not need
a survey to that extent for its property as far as lot splits.
Where surveys wauld be most helpful would be to the people who wi11
be purchasing each individual loC. In order to have the surveys
done, it is going to cost around $800.
Mr. Boardman stated the surveys have to be done, but it is a question
of whether the Authority should do'the surveys or if the Authority
would rather have the people who purchase the lots do the surveys.
The surveys have to be done at the time construction is started on the
lots.
Mr. Prieditis stated it was his opinion that the Authority should do
the surveys, but that the City should get another set of survey costs
for comparison to see if the surveys can be done cheaper.
The Authority concurred with Mr. Prieditis' suggestion.
- 3rd St. N.E, and Alley Vacation and Lot Split
E
Mr. $oardman stated the Planning Co�ission approved the 1ot split on
6025 - 3rd St. N.E. (Parlin property) and the a11ey vacation and lot
split on 5832 University (Johnson property). The City Council approved
the lot split on 6025 -3rd St. N.E. but had a problem with 5832 University.
The reason the City Council felt they should not vacate that right-of-
way is because the right-o£-way abuts the state high�oay right-of-way.
If the City would ever want to put in a bike trail or anything like
that on that property, it would be 6est to hold as much of the right-
of-way along the state highway right-of-way as possible. If the City
Council does not vacate the a11ey, then the City does not meet the
requirements for lot size.
Mr. Boardman stated there were some other questions on that property,
especially when they are talking about large family home occupancy.
With some of the applicants, they have the potential of 20-25 people
within those three 53-foot wide lots. The City Council has suggested
that the Authority reconsider and go from three lots to two lots in thaC
area.
Mr. Boardman stated that in looking at some of the houses in the area,
there are a lot of houses on 80-foot lots. If they decide to go with
two lots, he felt they would be in the position of having to seil the
lots £or $6,000 each instead of $4,000 each and still allow the people
to build, but provide more area to build and more yard area,
Mr. Commers asked whaC options the Authority had.
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT A[T1'HpRITY MEETING MAY 8 1980 PAGE 8
Mr. Boardman stated the Authority had the option of either continuing
with their request for three lots at 53-foot lot width or modifying
their request to two lots at 80-foot lot width. With the three lots,
if the City Council does not approve the alley vacation, then they
will have to go back for variances, because they will need a variance
on lot size.
Mr. Boardman stated that with the vacation of Che alley, he has been
informed by the City Engineer that they are not quite sure if all of
the alley vacation would go to the property. There has been some
claim that the Highway Dept. would get half of that alley right-of-way.
He stated he would be checking into this before going back to City
Council.
Mr. Boardman stated he would like some direction from the Authority
whether they should continue to push for the three 53-foot lots. The
City Council may turn it down, and then they will be required to go
with the two 80-foot lots.
Mr. Commers asked what the Planning Commission's opinion was on this
item.
Mr. Harris stated that the Planning Comsission did not feel the retention
of the alley was a problem. Ae personally did not think the holding
the alley right-of-way for a bikeway was a valid argument, for the
simple reason that the alley is being used for traffic in the next block.
Mr. Commers
they would
amend their
and Priedit
Houck voted
declared th
split at 58
request a 1
4. OTHER BUSINESS:
ted that the
request to
s voted ag
in favor o
t the Hous
2 Universi
A. Approval of Expenditures
City Council for two
t the amendment, and
e amendment. With a
& Redevelopment Autho
ve. N.E, of three 53-
0 80-foot lots and to
a vote on �ohether
-foot lots or
-foot 1ots. Co�
ndsen, Prairie, a
to 2 vote, Mr. Co
v's reauest for a
to
s
MOTSON by Mr. Prairie, seconded by Mr. Houck, to accept the expenditures
and approve the Check Register of $2,090, Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Chairperson Commers declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Ms. Svendsen, seconded by Mr. Houck, to adjourn the meeting. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Co�ers declared the May $, 1980,
Aousing & Redevelopment Authority meeting adjourned at 10:30 p.m.
Res ectf.ully subuiitted,
� � �
Lyn Saba
Recording Secretary
CITY OF FRIDLEY
APPEAIS COMM?SSION M[[TING, TUESDAY MAY 13, 19II0 PAGE 1
CALL TO ORDER:
Vice Chairweman Gabel ca7led the May 13, 1980 Appeals Cornmission meeting to
order at 7:4A p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Patricia Gabel, Alex Barna, James Plemel
Members Absent:: Virginia Schnabel, Richard Kemper
Others Present: Clyde Moravetz - Engineering/Administratiori
Michaei and Kathleen Moore - 5481 6th Street N.E.
John G. F}ora - Public Works Director
APPROVAL OF APPEALS COMMISSION t�IINUTES: APRIL 29. 1980
MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Plemel, to approve the April 24, 1980 Appeals
Cormnission minutes as written.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, NLL VOTING AYE, VICE CHAIRWOMAN GABEL DECLARE� TNE htOTION.CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
1
MOTION by Mr. Plemel, seconded by Mr. Barna, to open the Public t{earing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VTCE CHAIRWOP�AN GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC
HEARING OPEN AT 7:45 p.m.
Vice Chairwoman Gabel read the staff report:
ADi�ZNISI'RATIVE STAFk' REPO1zP
5981 - 6th Street N.E. '
A. P�BLZC °U?PCS� SER�7ED BY �?�UI'cEt•SE�:^•
Section 205.053, 43, rc�uires a minimum siZe vax3 zdjc�iaing lyviaq ��_ o=
10 feet '
Public ourpuse se_ve� ny t;�s requirer,;ent is to :�ai.Ztain a::tir.iat�.-;1 0_ 20 _eet �
between livir.q area :n adjacent St�1C*1WCS and 15 =eet DE`:J2?;� car=_ges �ad li•ii.q �
areas ia adjacent structares ;a reduce exposure to conPlaqra;.ier. o` f_ e. T_4
is a�so to allow fcz aesthetically oleasir.q opea zreas ascun� _•_�i�eat=al �',
struc�ures. ' t
APP&lI.S CCbM�lISSION I�rING TUFSDAY, l�1Y 13, 1980 Paae 2
Administrative Staff Report - Continued
Secticn 205.053, 4B, S�, reeuires a mininun sec.back o? 25 'a�t `_or aa at_�c:^.e�
or detached accessor.s buildinq :�hich ooens onto the sifle s==sec o� a cor:ez ?ot.
Public pur:ose served �y this requirement is to a].low for o_°�-st:est oarking
wit:�out elcroacli.^,g on 1'�e pubi:.c sighc of way and also the aes�he_c
consi�'erztion o: the neighbortood to r�duce the bu:,ldi:g "lzne o� s:gitt"
encrczc u�er.t into the neign.,'ror's °ront yard. '
B. STA7�;D HARDSIII?:
,a —
W� wou13 iike to line garac�e 1D crith line of house; 21 fe�t fron lot line
and 33 feet fro� EOth �-renue. :lesd for double garage laav2s aingle garyge
wi�hoct functi�n A�.cc_�t �s 1iv?.rq s�ace.
C. e?�??fIi:=S"iRt?TIVE ST�i'F REVIEYI: . . . .
The existing hosse is setback 35 feet fron 6th Street (froat yard), 21 ?zet .
£rc:n 60th Avanue (side yard street side), and the attached garaae is 5 feet
frcm tiie south lot line. ?'he attached garaqe to the south (5973-oth Stree::)
is setback S£eet (1�erified} fro*.n the common iot line that wccld lea�•e 10
fe=t bet:veen a livinq area and an attached garage.
4'he honse to thc east (59E0-7t:� Street) f.aces 7th Street and is >�`.�ack
23 £eet (not veri£;.ed) from 60th Avenue so the propcsed detac;�ed garage
�:�u11 not be encroachiny in to their line of sight.
IF tha Board shou].d approve the�e two vasiance reqi;�sts, tha sta°f i:as no
stipulat.ions to reco::��aend.
MOTION by Mr. Plemel, seconded by Mr. Barna, to clpse the Public
Hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, µICE CHAIRtdOMRN 6ABEL DECLARED_THE' PUBLIC
HEARING CLOSED AT 7:57 P.M.
MOTION by Mr. Plemel, seconded by t�1r. Barna to approtie tHe variance
request pursuant to Chapter i05 of the Fridley City Code, to reduce the
side yard setback .from the required 10 feet on the living side of a
dwelling, to 5 feet, to allow an existing attached garage to be con-
verted to living area, and reduce the side street setback for.a detached
accessory building from 25 feet to 21 feet, to allow the construction
of a 22 ft. by 26 ft. detached garage, on Lot 22, Block�5, Bonny
Addition, the same being 5981 - 6th Street N.E. (Request by Michael
�!oore, 5981 - 6th Street, N.R., Frirll?v, mrrt 55?33).
iIPO:I A VOICE VOTE ALL VOTI.IG AYE, . VICE-CHAIR410MAN GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION •
CF�F;RIED UNANII�IOU51�Y.:1
�
APPEALS COMMISS70N MEETING, MAY 13, 1980 Paqe 3
2. OTHER BUSTA'ESS:
None
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION BY Mr.Plemel, seconded by Mr. Barna, to adjourn the
May 13, 1980 Appeals Commission Meeting.
uPON A VOICE VOTE ALL VOTING AYE, t VICE__CNNiRWUMAN GP.BEL C�ECLARED THE MEETIAG
ADJOURNED AT 8:01 p,M,
Respectuflly submitted,
�, � �"iiiC 2 E,L.<v �/ktF {C.L:,'Y-,-�
.larcella Baldwin
Recording Secretary
HUA'fAN RESOURCES COMMISSION
MEETING
MAY 1, 1980
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Treuenfels called the May 1, 1980, Human Resources Commission
meeting to order at 7:38 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Peter Treuenfels, Mary van Dan, Wayne Welch, Jayne Nob1e
Members Absent: Wayne Saunders
Others Present: Mary Gayan, Human Services Assistant & Housing Specialist
APPROVAL OF APRIL 3, 1980, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MIN[JTES:
MOTION by Ms. van Dan, seconded by Mr. Welch, to approve the April 3, 1980,
Human Resources Coum�ission minutes as written. Upon a �•oice vote, all voting
aye, Chairperso:i Treuenfels declared the motion carried unanimously.
1. DISCUSSION OF ACCESSIBILITY POR THE HANDICAPPED IN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY:
Mr. Treuenfels stated that in a recent visit to North Park, he discovered
that North Park was not very accessible to the handicapped. He stated he '
had contacted the City Naturalist, Mr, Siah St. Clair, and Mr. St. Clair was
in the process of mapping out a part of a walkway that would be accessible
to the handicapped. Mr. Treuenfels stated he would like to meet with
Mr. St. Clair at some time to discuss this further.
Ms, Cayan stated that at the last Commission meeting, the Commission had
requested a list of the City's facilities. She stated she had obtained a
lisC of the facilities owned and maintained by the City, plus a list of the
Parks � Recreation-sponsored programs. She had talked to Ms, .7ulie Quarve-
Peterson of the Minnesota State Council for the Handicapped, and Ms. Quarve-
Peterson had stated that at this time the Commi.ssion should only be concerned
with the accessibility of the City's buildings and that she would like to
ecmie and speak to the Commission again before they tackled any of the City's
programs.
Ms. van Dan suggested that the Commission members survey these facilities
using the "Minnesota SCate Council for the Handicapped Accessibility Survey
Form".
Mr. Treuenfels and Ms. van Dan volunteered to do an accessibility survey
of Pridley City Hall. Ms. Noble volunteered to survey the Municipal Liquor
Store, and P1r. Welch volunteered to survey the Innsbruck Nature Center and
the Moore Lake Beach Ilouse, Mr. Treuenfels asked Ms. Cayan to contact
Mr. Saunders to see if he would be cailling to do an accessibility survey of
the Fridley Fire Department.
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING MAY 1 1980 PAG$ 2
Mr. Welch asked what the Coum�ission members should do after they have
completed their accessibility surveys?
Mr. TreuenEels stated that the Commission would have to make a report of
their findings to the Planning Co�ission, as the City wants to know if they
are in compliance and what needs to be done to be in compliance. The
Covm�ission members will have to complete their accessibility surveys before
the June meeting so the surveys can be discussed and a report drafted to
the Planning Co�ission. �
Ms. van Dan suggested that each Commission member draft a pYeliminary
report on each survey so these reports can be put together at the meeting.
Ms. Cayan stated that if the Co�ission members would send or give her their
preliminary reports by May 29, she would xerox copies to be included in the
mailing of the minutes and agenda for the June meeting. That way each
Commission member would be familiar with each of the reports before the
meeting.
The Cou�ission members concurred with that suggestion. They also agreed
they would like to invite Ms. Julie Quarve-Peterson to the ,Tune 5, 1980,
Commission meeting.
Ms. Cayan stated she had reserved the Co�unity Billboard for National
Handicapped Week, May 18-24. She had also obtained materials and brochures
to be put on display at City Hall during National Handicapped Week.
Ms. Cayan stated she would be attending a"�S 504 Training Session for City
Offials" on May 14-15. Any interested Cou�ission members could also attend.
2. DISCUSSION OF THE "NO-FAU[,T
Mr. Treuenfels stated this was discussed at the April 23 Planning Commission.
Mr. Boardman had explained a couple of technical difficulties with the "No-
Fault Grievance Procedure". One was the lack of staff time, and the other
was the legal liability.
Mr. Treuenfels stated that Mr, Langenfeld felt the concept was good, but
that the implementaCion did not appear to be good. Ms. Hughes was in
general favor of the procedure, and it was Mr, Harris' feeling that he had
not seen a proven need for a service like this in the community.
Mr. Treuenfels stated the Commission members would have to consider these
points in their deliberations of whether'to go with the "No-Fault Grievance
Procedure" or not.
Mr. Treuenfels stated he was not at all sure how many people would make use
of this procedure if it was established in Fridley. It was a difficult thing
Co predict. In the past, there have only been a couple of discrimination
cases. But, it may be that if a grievance procedure was established and
publicized that more people would avail themselves of the service. The
interest could also be minimal.
,'�� —
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION ME�TING MAY 1 1980 PAGE 3
Mr. Treuenfels st-ated he was not at a11 clear what Che aYtitude of the
State Department of Human Rights was with respect to the City's working
with the "No-Fault Grievance Procedure" at the Iocal level. Mr. Boardman
felt that the Department of Human Rights has so much work to do and so many
court cases that they want to push some of this work off on the communities
without reimbursing the cammunities for any staff time. If that is so, he
was very puzzled as to why the Department of Human Rights was so reluctant
to work with the cou�unities. The State Department of Human Rights would
not even send Fridleg a copy of the "No-Fault Grievance Procedure".
Ms, Cayan had obtained a copy from Coon Rapids.
Mr, Treuenfels stated that, as far as the Co�ission was concerned, they
would have no 1ega1 power to take anyone to court, and the possibility always
exists that someone could sue the City. This was something that would have
to be a City Council decision--whether the City Council would want to take
the legal risk of legal litigation to the City.
Mr, We1ch stated the Commission could recou�end that the City Council hire
an official grievance person with a legal background.
Ms, Noble stated thexe were so many other agencies to help with grievances--
the list was almosC limitless of places to go for he1p, although they were time-
consuming.
Ms, van Dan stated she thought there should be a mechanism and a procedure,
but she did not feel the Commission should get involved in the "No-Fault
Grievance Procedure". She stated the Commission went through the whole
process with the "Memorandum of Agreement" and found it was not workable.
She had the feeling that every time the State had a new Human Rights
Ca�issioner or a staff change, there might be a new procedure, and the
Co�ission would have to go through the process a11 over again. Even though
the process seems Co be fine and good, she would rather see the Coumiission
make the recoum�endation that the grievant go directly to the State Department
of Human Rights and go through that process. From experience, she knew you
could get into some tricky legal situations just because of the misuse.of
a word. She did not think the Coonnission members were experts in this area,
and it was a very difficult field to work in, She personally would not
want to assume that responsibility. She sCated that if, in the fuCure, the
City wishes to have a procedure such as this, the Commission could suggest
the City have someone on staff who was trained who would assume this
responsibility, as Mr..Welch had suggested earlier.
MOTION BY MS; VAN DAN, SECONDED
THROUGH PLANNIATG CO:fMIS5I0N. TH
A
HUPtAN RIGHTS OR OTIlER APPFOPR
DEMAND ARTSES FOR A GRIEVAhTCG
OR TIIE
ATIOI3; IF
THE HUI�IAN
COPfMISSION DOES N
AT TI]E CITY LEVEL
COMMI
A
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIN6 AYE� CHAIRPERSON TREUENFELS DECLARED THE Pi0TI0N
CARRiED UNAIVIMOUSLY;
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING MAY 1 1980 PAGE 4
3, OTHER BUSINESS:
Ms. Cayan stated the City has received a request for funding from the
Anoka County Historical Society. She stated the "Guidelines for Setting �
Priorities of Funding Requests"have been approved by City Council. Since
the Anoka County Historical Society has not received a copy of these
guidelines, she fe2t a letter and a copy of the guidelines should be sent
to them.
Mr. Treuenfels stated a copy of the guidelines should be sent to the
Anoka County Historical Society and suggested that the letter say, in
essence, that if they would send the Coum�ission their proposat in conformance
with the guidelines, particularly Item TII, the Commission wou2d be happy
to consider their request.
MOTION by Mr. Welch, seconded by Ms. van Dan, to request Staff to send a �
letter and a copy of the "Guidelines for Setting Priorities of Funding y
Requests" to tfie Anoka County Historical Society. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Chairperson Treuenfels declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Ms. Noble, secon3ed by Mr. Welch, to adjourn the meeting. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Treuenfels declared the May 1, 1980, �
Human Resources Commission meeting adjourned at 9;20 p.m. �
Respectfully submitted,
C ° �,
L e Saba
Recording Secretary
_ '�. .
� ` .,-
.� ,
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANPIING COAAiiSSION MEETING, MAY 21, 1980
CALL TO ORDER:
Acting Chairperson Langenfeld called the May 21, 1980, Planning Commission
meeting to order at 7:38 p.m.
ROT,L CALL:
Members Present: Mr. Harris (arr. 7:39 g.m.), Mr. Treuenfels, Mr. Oquist,
Ms. Gabel (fox Ms. Schnabel), Mr. Langenfeld, Mr. Wharton
Members Absent: Ms. Hughes
Others Present: Serrold Boardman, City Planner
Isabelle & Duane Motzko, 290 Ely St. N.E.
Ken Brustad, 272 Ely St. N.E,
APPROVAL OE MAY 7, 1980, PLAIa]ING COrIMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Ms. Gabel, to approve the May 7, 1980,
Planning Co�ission minutes as written. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Chairman Harris declared the motion carried unanimously.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMiT, SP ��80-03, DUANE MOTZKO:
Per Section 205.051, 2, A, of the Fridley City Code, to allow the
construction of a second accessory building, a 22 ft. by 22 ft. detached
garage for the storage of a boat and car, located on lots 45 and 46,
Block 11, Spring Brook Park Addition, the same being 290 Ely St. N.E.
MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Langenfeld, to open the public hearing
on SP ik80-03 by Duane Motzko. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairman Harris
declared the public hearing open at 7:40 p.m.
Mr. Boardman stated this is a 60 ft. lot. The present building is a house
with an attached garage. The proposal is for the construction of a detached
garage in the rear yard for storage. Because of the situation and because
the Zoning Code requires a special use pexmit for a second accessory buildin�
in excess of 240 sq, ft., Mr. Motzko is proposing a special use permit.
Mr. Motzko stated the existing attached garage will remain a garage. He is
in need of another garage just for storage of a car and boat. He intends to
cut a garage door in the back of the existing garage, then build a 10 foot
patio between the two gaiages., sa 8here would be about 14 feet between the two
garages.
Mr, Motzko stated that if he had the o.k. from the City that the alley would
remain open, he would put the garage back farther and have access through the
a11ey, but he was not assured that the alley would remain accessible in the
future.
PLANNING CObQilSSION MEETING, MAY 21, 1980 PAGE 2
Mr. Harris stated that Mr. Motzko may have received some misinformation about
alleys.
Mr. Boardman stated that anytime there is access off an alley, the a11ey should
not be closed, and Mr. Motzko would have legal recourse if an alley he was
using was closed. It was a question of what would work better for Mr.Motzko,
knowing that the alley may or may not ever be improved, Mr. Boardman stated
that the City wi11 not plow alleys unless they are paved alleys. If there
are not enough people on a block to request the paving of an alley, the City
will not maintain an a11ey right-of-way. If Mr. Motzko wauted to have access
to his garage from the alley, he has the legal right to do so and has the
legal right to maintain that alley right-of-way. Yf iC is easier for Mr. Motzko
to maintain access from his existing garage, Mr. Boardman stated that would
probably be the best way to go.
Mr. Motzko stated he would like access through his existing garage.
Mr. Harris asked if there was anyone in the audience who would like to speak
regarding this item.
Mr. Ken Brustad, 272 Ely St. N.E.,stated he lives one block east of Mr. Motzko.
His main concern was whether Mr. Motzko would be painting the garage as he
did not want an eyesore in the neighhorhood.
13r. Motzko stated the new garage would be painted to match the house and
attached garage. He stated the garage would be built by Sussell. He also
stated that if he had a lot of neighborhood objections, he would be willing
to put up a redwood fence that would run along the side of the new garage up
to the exisCing garage. The garage wi11 face the same direction as the
existing garage.
Mr, Langenfeld stated there did not seem to be much opposition, and there was
a sizeable mailing list.
MOTION by Mr. Langenfeld, seconded by Mr. Treuenfels, to close the public
hearing on SP �680-03 by Duane Motzko. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Chairman Harris declared the public hearing closed at 7:58 p.m.
MOTION by Mr. Langenfeld, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to recommend to City Council
the approval of a request for a Special IIse Permit, SP �680-03, by Duane Motzko;
Per Section 205.051, 2, A, of the Fridley City Code, to allow the construction
of a second accessory building, a 22 ft. by 22 ft, detached garage for the
storage of a boat and car, locaCed on lots 45 and 46, Block 11, Spring Brook
Park Addition, the same being 290 Ely SY. N.E „ with no stipulations.
Mr. Langenfeld stated that he felt Chis request was in accordance with the
Zoning Code and special use requirements, and Mr. Motzko is going to make
this structure compatible with the existing area. Also, the special use pexmit
does have the element of control.
PLANNING CONAIISSIOI3 MEETING MAY 21 1980 PAGE 3
UPON A VOICE VOTS, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED
UNANlMOUSLY;
MY:-Harris stated Special Use Permit SP �k80-03 would go to City Council on
June 2.
MOTION by Ms. Gabel, seconded by Mr. I,angenfeld, to suspend the rules and
adopt "Renewal of Special Use Permit SP ik74-16 as Item 2 on the agenda. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairman Aarris declared the motion carried
unanimously.
2. RENEWAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP �74-16 for Reynold Swanson to operate a
mobile home sales lot, located on the West 375 feet of Lot 3, A.S. ��89,
the same being 7151 Highway �F65 N.E.:
Mr. Harris asked if this was a renewal of a special use permit or a reviewal
of a special use pexmit?
Mr. Boardman stated that when City Council granted this special use permit,
they granted it for a period of five years, but nothing was said about whether
it was to be renewed or reviewed.
Mr. Harr3s stated he d3scussed this Monday night at the City Council meeting
with Virgil Herrick, City Attorney. It was Mr. Herrick's opinion that if this
is a review, the Planning Coffinission can handle it as an agenda item, but if
it is a renewal., if the existing permit expires, there is some question of
whether it has to go to public hearing because it is like a new special use;-
permit.
Mr. Oquist stated that on page 2 of a letter dated Dec. 31, 1974, to
Reynold E. Swanson from the City of Fridley, it stated that "this Special
Use Permit be issued for a maximum of five years or to run concurrently with
the lease, whichever is less." He felt that meant this special use permit is
a renewal.
Mr. Boardman stated the Planning Coum�ission had talked before abouC what they
wanted to do on these kinds of things. He thought the Planning Commission
had decided to stop looking at renewals of things and start just having
reviews of special use permits. The way this request is laid out is not very
clear at all.
Mr. Treuenfels stated that in Mr. Swanson's letter dated April 21, 1980, to
the City Council, he was requesting a renewal of the special use permit.
Mr. Boardman stated the way they have set ug the poiicy or process is that
a renewal--any permit that was going to be renewed--would not have to go
through the public hearing process, but would follow the normal process of
being reviewed by the Planning Caumiission and CiCy Council, because, primarily,
the Planning Coum�ission and CiCy Council would be looking to see if the
operation was in compliance with the requirements of the special use permit.
He stated he would like some clarification on how the Planning Covmiission
wanted to handle this.
FLANN2I3G CO1�lISSION MEETIA7G, MAY 21, 1980 PAGE 4
Mr. OquisC stated that assuming this operation is in compliance with the
special use requirements, they could not deny the special use permit under a
reviewal process. But, assuming the City did not want trailer sales anymore,
if it was a renewal, they could then deny that renewal of the special use
permit and eliminate that business.
Ms. Gabel stated that i"f there were people who had any camplaints against
this operation, the City would never lmow about those complaints with just a
reviewal process and no public hearing.
Mr. $oardman stated that once a special use permit is granted, there are some
real problems in legally denying a special use permit with either a renewal
or rev3ewal, because special use permits are granted to the 1and and go with
the land regardless of the operation.
Mr. Harris referred to the second paragraph in the Dec. 31, 1974, letter from
the City of Fridley to Mr. Swanson: "A Special Use Permit to operate a mobile
home sales lot is given only Co Reynold E, Swanson as an individual and he
will be the operator of Che business. If the business changes hands or he no
longex is the majority owner and operator of the business, the permit will
be null and void, and would have to be reviewed by the City Council before
transfer." Mr. Harris stated that statement was Legally unsound.
Mr. Boardman stated this trailer sales operation is a very clean operation.
They have followed all the special use stipulations, and he really did not
see any reason why they shouldn't go ahead and process this special use permit.
The City has never had any complaints about Che operation.
Mr. Langenfeld stated it was his concern that the special use permit be
rewritten so that the name was off the special use permit and the special use
permit went only with the property.
Mr. Harris stated he had the feeling they should have Mr. Swanson go through
the public hearing process again and request City Council to waive the fee.
The way the special use permit is written, it looks like the permit has expired.
Mr. Oquist stated the special use permit apgarently exgired on Dec. 31, 1979,
so Mr. Swanson was operating illegally with no special use permit at this
time. Therefore, Mr. Swanson should he asked to request a new special use
permit.
MOTION bv Mr. LanQenfeld, seconded bv Mr. Oauist, that Special Use Permit,
Swanson to operate a
ot 3. A.S. 9kS9. the
cont3nued until s
e nermit are issued, wi.th the stivulation that the
ve �ne iee ana cnac a
Mr. Harris stated that Mr. Boardman should talk to Mr. Herrick about just
having to notify the people within 200 ft. of the mobile home sales lot,
rather than having to publish notices in the newspaper.
PLANNlNG COt�A'fLSSION MEETING MAY 21 1980 PAGE 5
Mr. Boardman stated that when this comes back to the Planning Commission, they
should try to clean up the language on special use permits and decide how they
want to handle special use permit reviews.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMt1N HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANlMOUSLY.
3. RECEIVE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE FROM CITY OF SPRING LAKE PARK: Rezoning
and Special Use Permit to be used for the construction of a 60-unit
apartment complex for the elderly, generally located in the vicinity of
Terrace and Oshorne Roads. Meeting will be held May 27, 1980, at
7:30 p.m.
MOTION by Mr. Langenfeld, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to receive the public
hearing notice from Spring Lake Park.
Mr. Harris stated that what bothexed him about Spring Lake Park's projects
was the drainage. Wou1d this project substantially increase the flow into
Fridley's storm sewex system? He thought it probably would. He stated that
one advantage with this project is that Spring Lake Park wi11 need Metropolitan
Council's concurrence, because of funding. He felt he or:.Mr. Boardman should
attend Che public hearing on May 27 and see how Spring Lake Park intends to
handle the quality and quantity o£ water. After they see what Spring Lake
Paxk's plans are, if there is a problem, they can write a letter to Metro-
politan Coimcil.
iiPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, C13AIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. RECEIVE MAY 1, 1980, HUMAN RESOURCES COPSIISSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Treuenfels, seconded by Mr. Langenfeld, to receive the
May 1, 1980, Human Resources Co�ission minutes.
Mr. Boardman stated that the Human Resources Commission had made a motion on
page 3 reco�ending to City Council, through Planning Co�ission, that the
Human Resources Covmiission does not see a demand for the No-Fault Grievance
Procedure.
Mr. Harris stated the Planning Co�ission could discuss whether they agreed
with the findings of the Human Resources CoAnmission. If they do agree, they
could concur with that motion.
Mr. Treuenfels stated that, as a member of the Planning Commission, he did
not really concur with the views expressed by the Human Resources Commission,
He felt it would be worthwhile for the Co�ission to at Least be attentive
to the needs of the people and attentive to the expxessions of those needs.
Maybe the Human Resources Co�ission could not really do what was suggested
in the No-Fault Grievance Procedure, but he felt it would have been better if
the:Fridley Human Resources Commission had followed the example of Coon Rapids
�
PLANNiNG COMNIISSION MEETING, MAY 21, 1980 PAGE 6
and Columbia Heights
at this level. Then,
of Human Rights.
and gone ahead with at least listening to complaints
if need be, passing those complaints on to the Department
Mr. Trsuenfels stated he would be happy if the Planning Co�ission would
concur with the Human Resources Commission's motion as made, but recommend
that if the circumstances should change in the future, the Human Resouxces
Co�ission look at this procedure again in a year or two years from now.
c
State
Human Resources
Human
not see
at
the
a
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED URARIMOUSLY;
5. RECEIVL MAY S, 1980, HOUSING & REDEV&LOPMENT AUTiiORITY NIINUTES:
t�OTION by Mr. Langenfeld, seconded by Ms. Gabel, to receive the May 8, 1980,
Housing & Redevelopment Authority minutes. IIpon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Chairman Harris declared the motion carried unanimously.
6. RECEIVE MAY 13, 1980, APPEAL5 CONII�fLSSION NffNUTES:
Ms. Gabe1 stated that these minutes were a little incomplete as no discussion
was included on the variance requesC. She stated that when these minutes go
Co City Council, she would like a statement included in the minuCes that a
brief discussion was held on that item,
MOTION by Ms. Gabel, seconded by Mr. Treuenfels, to receive the May 13, 1980,
Appeals Co�ission minutes, but that the minutes be amended to include a
statement that a br#ef discussion was held on the variance request. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Chairman Harris declared the motion carried
unanimously.
Chaixman Harris declared a ten-minute break at 9:15 p.m.
7. CONTINUED: PROPOSEA CHANGES TO CHAPTER 205. ZONING:
Mr..Boardm�n �tated t�iey-�aouid'-�ike to set the Zoning Code up for public
hearing before the City Counc3l on July 1. They would like to have it adopted
and zn:apexation in August. He stated that if the Planning Conm�ission does
not think they can finish the Zoning Code at their regular meetings, they
should consider having special meetings.
Mr. Harris stated they should see how far they get on the Zaning Code at this
meeting and then dec3de whether to have a special meeting.
PLANNiNG COI�ILSSION MEETING, MAY 21, 1980 PAGE }
205.10 R-4 DISTRICT REGULATIONS
Page 46
205.104_Parking Requirements
�62-A. "construction" should be changed to "constructed"
205.105 Performance Standards
Mr. Soardman recoumiended that the Planning Commission approve the Performance
Standards with the same changes as made in R-3. He would then make those
changes as requested by the Planning Coumiission under R-3.
The Planning Commission concurred with Mr. Boardman's recommendation.
Page 48
4k5-A. Change to -"The minimum landscaped area for the mobile home park
shall be 35 percent of the total site."
Mr, Wharton stated there was nothing requiring storm shelters or tornado
sheltexs for mobile home parks.
Mr. Boardman stated they have never required a mobile home park to build a
solid structure. With onLy two mobile home parks in Eridley, he did not think
they could require the parks to build a shelter at this point.
Mr. Harris stated there are now some state requirements about tie-downs in
mobile home parks, and he thought there was also something about a permanent
shelCer-type building.
Page 49
205.11 TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
Mr, Boardman stated this section was moved from the end of the Zoning Code to
this location, primarily because there was no special district that was set up
as a townhouse district and the Yownhouse district falls into any of the
R districts.
205.111 Procedure for Townhouse Development Approval
4k2. "Section 205.192" should be changed to "Section 205.20"
G 2. Delete "morals" in the 7th 1ine.
Mr. Boardman referred to 205.111, Item 2: "In addition to the procedure as
outlined in this ordinance, there shall be provided a general plan of develop-
ment as required under 5ection 205.20 of this code, except...." He stated
PLANNTNG COMNIISSION MEETING, MAY 21, 1980 PAGE 8
that 205.20 is the Planned Unit Development District. Does the Planning
Cou�ission want to go through the planned unit development process for town-
house development? It is a lengthy process and an expensive process. What
process did they want to go through for townhouse development and also planned
unit development?
Mr. Harris stated they could say something like: "AL1 townhouse development
in R-1, R-2, and R-3 zones shall have a special use permit."
Mr. Boardman suggested that the statement read; "In addition to the procedure
as outlined in this ordinance, there sha11 be provided a general plan of
development as required under the special use permit process."
The Planning Couimission concurred with that suggestion.
Mr. Oquist asked if they should make a requirement for a townhouse association.
Mr, Harris stated that could be a s£ipulation in the special use permit.
C-3. Change to -"When Townhouse Development is granted in an R-1 District,
the development sha11 consist of owner occupied dwelling
uniCs."
Page 50
205.12 P DISTRICT REGOLATIONS
205.121 Uses Permitted
Mr. Harris stated that under Item 1, Principle Uses, when you start talking
about airports, it is conceivable that at some future time, there could be
a landing pad for helicopters. He would almost like to see some of these
uses with a special use permit, because there should be a;public hearing on
something like that. If puhlic lands are going to be used for some of these
things, even athletic fields, he thought the surrounding neighbors should
have the legitimate right to lmow and voice their opinions of what the City
intends to develop in an area. If that had been done before, the City
wouldn't have the problem they have at Coumions Park right now, because that
area really impacts the neighborhood.
Mr. Ha=ris stated that later in the Zoning Code, they should talk about the
possibility of landing strips in the C and M Districts, which has never been
thought about before. There is the possibility of Onan or Medtronic wanting
a helicopter pad, or Unity Hospital needing a helicopter pad for transporting
accident patients. Rather than saying, "airports", they should probably say
"aircraft facilities",
Mr. Boardman suggested that anly emergency helicopter landing pads for
hospitals be allowed with a special use permit in R-1, R-2, and R-3. He did
not think they should allow helicopter pads for industry.
PLAlQA7ING C�ffSSION MEETING, MAY 21, 1980 PAGE 9
The Planning C anmission members concurred with Mr. Boardman's suggestion.
Mr. Harris stated that maybe a11 of Item 4k1-B ("Public parks, playgrounds,
athletic £ields, golf courses, airports, parking area") should be with a
special use permit. The reason for that is that people who abut the proposed
project area are then notified of what is taking place, because it will impact
their property.
Mr. Langenfeld stated that he was concerned about the special use permit,
because it is reaching the point where special use permits are just a formality
and are never denied.
Mr. Boardman stated that maybe they could set up a process where all public
facilities must require publication to people within 200 feet of a proposed
project area. Maybe it could be just a public heaYing process for citizen
input and not be involved in any special use permit process. He asked what
types of public impxovemants would they want to hold public hearings £or?
He thought it should only be when new parks are purchased and not capital
costs and not capital improvements,
Mr, Harris stated the Planning Co�ission should think about this question and
bring back any suggestions and concerns at the next meeting.
MOTION by Mr. Langenfeld, seconded by Mr. Wharton, to continue discussion on
Proposed Changes to Chapter 2�5. Zoning. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Chairman Harris declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Harris stated Yhat since the Planning CoQrtniss3on had a light agenda for
the June 4 meeting, they should start the meeting at 7:00 p,m. in order to
accomplish as much as possible on the Zoning Code.
AATOUR1�fEflT ;
MOTION by Mr. Langenfeld, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to adjourn Che meeting. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairman Harris declared the May 21, 1980,
Planning Caumission meeting adjourned at 10:41 p.m.
Respectfully submiCted,
L e Saba '
Recording Secretary
�' L�-ntii�u�-r�
� � / �� �����
��� �� i
���
� ����
_ , ���
�a.�ei� �-� �
_ D.�.�.R-� �
. �
Z9o�s���. �,�
�d G� �f � F, �2:
a�a ���` fv� ������