Loading...
PL 02/04/1981 - 6751PIANNING COMMI5SI0N�'ME�FTING [JEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY }�l 1987 7:30 P.M` � PUBLIC . PtANNING COMMISSION MEETING CALL TO ORDER: ROLt CALI: \ City of Fridley AGENDA ; i WEDNES�AY, FE6RUARY 4, 1981 APPROYE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: �ANUARY 21, 198t 1. GONTINUED: PUBLIC HEARIN6: ZOA #80-06 BY W. G. DOTY AN� GARY T. 4lELLNER: Rezone the following described parcels from { light industrial areas) to R-3 (general multiple family dwellings), Thet part of Blocks 8 and 9, Lowell Addition to fridley Park, lying South of the North line of Sylvan Hills Plat 8, together with the Easterly 1/2 of vacated E1m.Street, and the part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 7, Lowell Addition to Fridley Park;�lying Southerly of the Westerly half of vacated Elm Street, located South of Mississippi Street, and East of Burlington Northern right-of-way. Public Hearing closed. 2. CONTINUED: 3. 4. RY WEL NER: Vacate that part of Minnesota Street, as 7aid out i'� n�l Addition to Fridley Park; or Mercury Drive> as laid oui in 5ylvan Hil7s Plat 3, now known as Sate}lite Lane, lying West of the Northerly extension of the West line of Starlite Blvd., also being the East line of Lot 1, Block 4, Slyvan Nitls Plat 3. PUBLIC NEARING: REQUES7 FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP �i80-T3 8Y WALTER J. MILLER: Per Section 205.051, 2, A, to al}ow an existing accessoty buiid 14 ft. x 20 ft. to be moved to the rear of the property and be used for a storage shed, and a new detached garage, 24 ft. by 30 ft. to be constructed on Lot 8, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 21, the same being 945 Mississippi Street N.E. NK1NfTIVG 4UMYANY: nemg a repiat or tSiocK ii, �reat norLnern Industrial Center, Fridley, along with some unplatted land. (See Public Hearing notice for complete legal description) to allow the construction of a new building for 41ebb Priniing Company,,the same being 5101 Industrial 81vd. N.E. 5. CONTINUED: CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSED NOISE ORDINANCE 6. 7. RECEIVE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: JANUARY 14, 1981 7:30 P.M. PAGES l - 13 14 15 16 - 21 22 - 27 28 - 3G SEPARATE GREEN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 4, 1981 �I AGENQa RlFGE 2 8. REVEIVE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: JANUARY 15 1981 9. RECEIVE C6MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES: JANUARY 13 198�-- 10. RECEIVE ENVIRONMENTAI pUAlIT1' COMMISSION MINl1TES: JANUARY 20. 1981 11. RECEIVE APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: JANUARY 27 1981 12. OTHEi2 BUSINESS: ADJOURNMENT: 0 SALMON PiNK � YELLOW � CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 21, 1981 C�L TO ORDER: Chairman Narris calied the January 21, 1981, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:31 p.m. ROII CALL: Metr�ers Present Me�ers Absent Mr. Narris, Ms. Schnabel, Ms. Modig (for Mr. Oquist), Ms. Hughes, Mr. Wharton Mr. Treuenfels, Mr. Svanda Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner Bill Deblon, Associate Planner Rick Martin, 5275 Edina Ind. Blvd. Rob Taylor, 5275 Edina Ind. 61vd. Darrell Anderson, 15 S. 5th St., Minneapolis W. G. Doty, U5 Logan Parkway N.E. Gary Wellner, 6221 Sunrise Drive N.E. See attached list APFROVAL OF JANUARY 7, 1481, PLANNING C�MMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY M5. SCHNABEL, SECONDBD BY MS. MODIG��TO APPROVE THE JANUARY 7, 1981, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES. Mr. Harris indicated that on�page 8, second paragraph from the bottom, the words, "walk-in freight", should 6e deleted. UFON R VOICE VOTIi, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED TNE MINUTES APPROVED AS AMENDED. 1. CONTINUED: DISCUSSION ON REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #80-05_,_BY_WIfVFIELD b�PELOPMENTS, INC.: To rezone Lot 2, except t e Nort er yi50 feet, and ots 3, ,.an inclusive, Block 7, Paco Industrial Park, from C-2 (qeneral business areas) to M-1 (light industrial areas) to a11ow the construction of a 98,000 square foot building to be used for office and office warehouse, light manufacturing and servfice, the same being 7t51-7251 Co�nerce Circle East. Public Hearing closed. MOTION BY MS. SCHNABEL, SECONDED BY MS. HUGHES, TO REOPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ZOA #80-05 BY WZNFIELD DEVETAPMENTS, TNC. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTiNG AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRZS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING�REOPENED AT 7:35 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 21, 1981 PAGE 2 Mr. Boardman stated he had met with Winfield Developments, Inc. He stated they have drawn up a new development as suggested by the Planning Commission at their tast meeting. They have split the buitding. They are proposing that the building on the north rema9n cor�nercial zoning, and the building on the south go to M-1 industrial. There are 40 feet between the entrances of the two buildings, and 50 feet between the part of the building that go in. Mr. Boardman stated that Mr. Gerald Paschke, one of the neighbors who objected to the development, has written a letter to Mr. Narris, Chairman of the Planning Commission. One of the conditions Mr. Paschke would like to see is that t�e property on the north end, Lots 2 and 3, reroain commercial, and the three lots to the south, Lots 4, 5, and 6, be zoned industrial for development. Mr. Boardman stated that Mr. Anderson, architect far Winfield Qevelopments, Inc., was in the audience and would answer any questions. Mr. Darrell Anderson stated he thought one of the primary reasons the proposal was objectionable was the overall length of the pr�ject. They have now come back and have demonstrated they can split the bui7ding. Thay have lost some square footage. They now have 94,000 sq. ft. .Their intention is still to have the similarly low profile structure. Mr. M 8erson stated there was so�e concern at the last meeting about the docks facing south towards the new community park. They have redone the building so the docks face to the north. Mr. Anderson stated another concern at the last meeting was the height of the structure and what is going to be seen. He stated that, in traveling past the stracture, people are really only going to see the foliage and the wa11s, and ottly about four foot maximum height of the structure is going to show behind the walls. Ms. Schnabel asked if Winfield Developments, Inc., was stil] requesting the entire strip to be rezoned to M-1> or in view of the fact that they had changed one bu9lding to office and the other building to light industrfal, were they splitting the zoning into two sections? Mr. Taylor stated they have had discussions with the City Attorney and are, hopefully, goirrg to receive an opinion from the City Attorney which would allow the office/warehouse type of use that fs contemplated in both buiTdings to be allowed in a commercial district. With that in mind, they can delete the rezoning of the northern building and retain it as commercial. That would prec]ude manufacturing type uses, but it would allow the affice/warehouse. So, in essence, they are changing their zoning. Mr. Harris stated he had received the letter from Mr. Paschke dated Jan. 16, 1981, in which Mr. Paschke had stated he was unable to attend this Planning Comnission meeting. Mr. Paschke had stated the Paco Industrial Aark opened less than two years ago, and he felt that, given reasonabie time, future development will be sat9sfactory to all. Mr. Paschke stated fie felt the best plan would be for PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 21, }gg� PAGE 3 Lots 2 and 3 to remain commercial and Lots 4„ 5, and 6 would make a good industrial site which, if done properly, would not distract from the Park to the sauth, the office building to the north, or the rest of the industrial property to, the west. Mr. Paschke had stated rezoning the entire property from commercial to industrial and constructing two bui�dings would not be acceptable to him. In his opinion, there should be a commercial buffer between the office huilding and the industrial area. He also felt the property does not meet any of the requirements for zoning (hardship or need). MOTION BY. MS. HUGHE5� SECONDED BY J�. WHARTON� TO RECEIYE' INTO THE 22ECORD THE LETTER FROM GERALD W. PASCHKE DATED JAN. Z6, 1981. UPON A VOICE VOTE, RLL VOT3NG AYS, CHAIRMAN HRRRZS DECLARED TXE MOTIOD' CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION BY MR. WXAI2TON, SfiCONDED BY M5. HUGHES� TO CL05E THE PUBLIC��HERRING ON ZOR #80-OS BY WSNFIELD DE[�EIAPMENTS� INC. . UPON A WICE VOTE, ALL VOTSNG AY&, CHAIRMAN HRRRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIE'D UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated that at thelast meeting, she had stated she was opposed to the rezoning. Since then, she has spent some time doing some background work. She felt the Planning Commission was under a false impression at the last meeting. She had checked to see when the property was actual7y platted and zoned, and it was approved by the City Council in Feb. 1979. At the last rt�eeting, they were led to believe it was onty six months ago, when it actually has 6een almost two years ago. She had also checked the Planning Commission and City Council minutes> and the basic concerns for the entire area at the time the platting occurred were with: (1) the setback requirements, basically along 73rd Ave. What was going to happen with the buildings built on 73rd because of the difference in zoning across the street? arrd (2) the drainage problem. Ms. Schnabel stated there was not alot of discussion in the Planning Commission or City Council minutes in terms of concern over this,strip of land along llniversity being commerciat and M-1 and M-2. Ms. Schnabel stated she still has the concerns she expressed at the last Planning Commission meeting as to what happens if this land is rezoned and these developers are unable to either secure financing or proceed as proposed. She would 7ike the Planning Commission to consider a stipulation, if they do approve the rezoning, that should this proposal fa71 through for any reason, the rezoning would revert back to the original zoning. Ms, Hughes stated she liked the split in zoning. She has had some further thoughts about the need for office space in the Twin Cities and northern suburbs. She had done some looking at trends, and she has changed her mind a little bit in terms of the kind of need and desirability of that kind of space. She stated she was not so concerned about all of the lots remaining commercial. She would just as soon give a straight rezonirtg and was comfortable leaving it that zoning for whatever developer comes along. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 21 1981 PAGE 4 Ms. Modig stated she did not like spot zoning, although this proposal seemed like a good use for that land. She stated that if this development falls through for any reason, she would feei mone comfortabTe having the rezoning revert back to commercial. XOTION.BY MS. SCHNABEL, SECONDEb BY MR. WHARTON� TO�.RECOMMEND TO CSTY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #80-05, BY WINFIELD DEVELOPhIE�NTS�INC.� AS PROPOSED ON THE JRNUARY 22� 298Z� SITING DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS R AND B-: ��TO RSZONE ONLY L(7TS 4�� 5, AND 6 INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 1,.PACO�INDUSTRIAL PARK, FROM C-2 (GENERAL $USINESS.AREASJ TO�M-1 (LIGXT INDUSTRIAL AREAS)� TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 94,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING TD�BE USED FOR -0FFICE AND OF'FZCE WAREHOUSE, LIGHT MANUFACTURING AND�SERVICE, THE SAME BEING 7151-7251 GbMMERCE CIRLE EAST, WITH THE STIPULATION TXAT THE DEVELpFER WORK WITH CITY � STAFE IN COMZNG UP WITH A FAIR PORTION OF RORDWAY COSTS FOR THE CITY�ROAD GOING INTO THE CITY PRRK FACILITY. THE PLRNNING COMMISSZON WOULD ALSO RECOMMEND THAT SXOUISI TNE DEVEIAPER FA.TL TO DEVELOP THE PROPOSED SECTION AS SHOWN ON fiXfIIBITS A RND B, THE�REZpNING ItEVERT BACK TO.THE ORIGINAL C-2 ZONING. UPON A VDICE VOTE��ALL POTING AYE, CHAIRMAN�XARRIS DECLARED TXE�MOTION CARRSfiD UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Narris stated ZOA #80-05 was recommend for approval to City Council,and the public hearing will be held on Feb. 9, 1981. 2. PUBLIC HEARINGr REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #80-06, BY W. G. DOTY AND G RY WELLNER: Rezone the following described parcels from M-1 (light n ustria areas) to R-3 (general multiple famiiy dwellings): That part of Blocks 8 and 9, Lowell Addition to Fridley Park, iying Souih of the North line of Sylvan Nills Plat 8, together with the Easterly one-half of vacated Elm Street, and that part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 7, Lowe11 Addition to Fridley Park,lying Southerly of the WesterTy half of vacated street, located South of Mississippi Street, N.E., and East of the Burlington Northern right-of-way. MO270N BY MR. WHARTON� SECONDED BY MS, HUGHES� TO OPEN THE PU&ISC H&ARINC ON� ZOA N80-p6 BY W.G_ DOTY AND GARY A.� WELLNER. � UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THfi PITBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:23 P.M. � � � Mr. Boardman stated this property was located in Sylvan Hiils whTCh is a residential area. The property is presently zoned industrial. The property to the porth is zaned M-2, built on by RAO Manufacturing which presently has an industrial structure. The property due east is presently zoned R-3, multiple family structures are located'there. The property to the south is a11 single famiiy homes, and the property to the west is industriai (the rail- road tracks). PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 21, 1981 PAGE 5 Mr. 8oardman stated that Mr. Doty and Mr. Wellner, the petitioners, are in the audience. They would like to have this property rezoned to residential; h�wever, at this time, they do not have any plans as to what kind of residentia] wil,l be developed. Mr. Doty stated he wanted to maintain some flexibility, and the most flexi6le zoning is R-3. Mr. Doty stated there is mu7tiple residential adjacent to this property. He and Mr. Wellner are looking for a down zoning from light industrial (M-lj to R-3. He stated he would be willing to answer quest.ions and would be interested in hearing any objections. Mr. Boardman stated they have an unusual situation here where an industrial piece of property is locked against a residential area. There is no other access to the property unless the property was purchased by RAO Manufacturing and utilized this property for development. Right now, the only access to this piece of property is through the residential area; therefore, it is something that should be considered in the discussion tonight. Mr. Harris asked how large the parcel of land was. Mr. Doty stated it was 88,00� sq. ft. This.area would comfortably take a 34-unit building with garages. As suggested by Mr. Boardman, R-3 gives them some flexibility, and they would rather go R-3 than industrial. he stated he has no plans at this time. He has some thoughts, but will go with whatever is financially feasible. If the large multiple complex is not feasible because of financing, they would have the flexibility to go into quad-homes-- that kind of thing. Mr, Harris asked if anyone in the audience would like to speak to this item. Mr. Robert Lee> 130 Satellite Lane, stated he was invo7ved with this, because, being in real estate, he had worked with this piece of land for about ten years. He stated wou]d like to tell the Planning Commission some of the problems with this land. Mr. Lee stated the land was ovmed by Erick LeVine (Carlson-Levine, Inc.), who developed the whole area of Sylvan Hills. Mr. Lee stated he sold most of the land in Sylvan Ni11s, and one of the questions asked by the new owners was what was going to be done with the land. Ne told them he did not know, because it was zoned industrial. At the time, he thought that some- time in the future, the land might have one-story rental units for storage, which would not disxurb the residential area, or single family homes. Mr. Lee stated that Satellite Lane is a very narrow street; it is only about 60 feet wide and is one of tbe narrowest streets in the area. Traffic is very bad on ihat corner. Mr. Lee stated this particular land is also high--about 8 feet hig�er than the street. Because of the sewage lift station, because of the sewer in the street, and because of the multiple family units already on Sate7lite Lane, people are concerned because there is already too much traffic on the street. and they are concerned that the sewer can't handle that many more units. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 21, 1981 PAGE 6 Mr. Lee stated there have been so many accidents on that street that the City posted "no parking" signs on the street. So, there is no off-street parking. They just can't put that many more families on that street. But, this is Mr. Doty's and Mr. Weliner's land, and they should have the right to do some- thing with it. f Mr, Michael Larson, 6390 Starlite Blvd., stated that the mailing list shown on page ]6 of the agenda excludes everyone on Startite Blvd., of which he is one. His home.is the only home in Fridley that abuts the property, and he was not notified on the hearing on the rezoning or on the easement that adjoins his property. He stated the neighbors are concerned about traffic. Secondly, considering the number of rental units already on Satellite Lane, they feel that is rtare than enough for their area. He would never agree to another apartment building on that site. Duplexes might be o.k. if they were owner- occupied, but most of the neighbors are opposed to any rental housing on the site, He would also ]ike to mention that there is quite a bit of pedestrian traffic on the easement, and that is a concern that has to be considered. Mr. Doty stated he was a litt7e bit puzzled, becaase these people bought their properties knowing this property was zoned M-1. He and Mr. Wellner are looking for a down zoning from M 1. Mr. Wellner, 6221 Sunrise Dr. N.E., stated he was the original purchaser of the property. Ne bought•the land as M-1 with the intent to develop it light industrial, He and Mr. Doty are now 9n partnership. They decided that because most of the area is residential, they should go to the best use possible in residential, which would be multiple housing. They feel this is considering the peaple who live adjacent to tNe property. As tar as Satellite Lane, they now have a piece of property located on the corner which can go out Starlite Blvd. As implied, the traffic does not have to go up Satel7ite Lane. It may exit another way going out 61st and out to University. As Mr. Doty had stated, these people should have been aware that this property was zoned M-1, and he and Mr. Doty would be within their rights to put in light industrial. But, they are considering the neighbors when they are asking for the down zoning to R-3. Ms. Judy Kidder, 6360 Starlite B1vd., stated they addressed the Planning Commission three years ago concerning this Tand. It is a family neighborhood, and there are lots of small children. Because of the narrow street, there are chiidren ptaying in that area. 7here is plenty of traffic with the multip7e family units already there. There is a continual change in occupancy in a multiple dwelling. This is a family-centered area, and it would really change the character of the neighborhood to continue to pull that multiple family dwelling situation into a family section. She stated they bought their house four years,ago, and they were not aware that this property was zoned M-1. She did not think a lot of people knew that. Ms. Pautette Reid, 101 Sylvan Lane, stated that the site in question was not visible from her house, and she Tiked that. 3he stated it was not feasible to do a lot of industrial things with the land and maybe that is the reason PLMlNING COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 21, 1981 � PAGE 7 for the down zoning on the land now. She stated a lot of people were not notified about this rezoning, but they are here and that personifies the closeness they have in this neighborhood. Mr. Dennis Johnson, 6336 Starlite Blvd., stated he definite7y objected to the traffic already going up Satellite Lane. Children fiave to cross the street to get to the park. Mr. Jerry Severt, 100 Satellite Lane, stated he moved into his house in June. He knew there were apartment buildings there, and that was fine. But he would like to.mention that he did not feel that the street could handle any more apartments. He lives right on the corner and knows the traffic situation. Ms. Caroline Johnson,6336 Starlite Blvd., stated there is na curb on the street and they have had people drive up nn their yard. They do not need any more traffic. Mr. Wellner stated he also lives in Sylvan Hills. He stated the sewer has also backed up at his house, but it is not because of the a�,artmenis or the sewage station. It is.a much bigger prohlem. He also is somewhat concerned, and that is why he felt R-3 was better than light industrial for that 1and. Mr. Michael Larson stated he would not object to RAO Manufacturing purchasing the land, because they have always maintained their 6usiness very well: Ms. Judy Kidder, 6360 Starlite Blvd., stated they are also concerned about the upkeep and appearance of apartments or multiples. They are concerned about the appeararice of the neighborhood. Mr. Lee stated the apartment buildings across the street on Satellite Lane have always maintained a very nice front, and there is no problem with that: Mr. Doty stated the land is presently zoned M-1 which would allow for the construction of a 37,000 sq. ft. facility. Ne had talked to some of the neighbors, and had talked at some length with the City Planning Department about the inherent problems. It was their thought that the multiple residential was a compromise between the single family the neighborhood would like to have and the light industrial which it was possible to build with the present zoning. Ms. Schnabel stated the people should be aware that the current zoning, M-1, allows for other things 6esides light industrial; for example, a cleaning plant or laundry, warehousing, retail sales building, offices, etc. She could understand them not wanting a targe density of ,traffic throuqh the area, yet some of these other uses might produce the same effect if developed under M-1. It seems the property is too expensive to be developed as single family resi- dential. It comes down to working oui a compromise between light industrial and the apartments. She did not think it was realistic to deny the rezoning request and leave the property empty. There is an enormous demdnd for vacant land in Fridley. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 21, 1981 � PA6E 8 Mr. Larson stated his concern was that if the�rezoning was passed for R-3, it was like a blank check and they would have no right later on to deny what goes in on that property. He asked if the consideration of the rezoning request could be deferred until Mr. Doty and Mr. Wellner could bring in a specific plan of what they would Tike to do. The main concern here is that they are losing some element of control, whatever it might be, by taking one step back on the rezoning. Mr. Wellner stated that it was a nice suggestion, but there are dollars and cents indolved. The neighbors are asking he and Mr. Doty to put out additionaT 'money to put together a plan, because they were not able to do that at this point, Among other reasons, they do not know what monies are going to be available. MOTION BY MS. HUGHES,�SECONDED BY MR. WHARTON� TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ZOA.�80-06 BY W. G. DOTY AND GARY A. WELLNER. � UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYB� CHASRMAIJ HARRIS DECLARED TFIE PUBLIC HEARING � CLOSED AT 9:43 P.M. Ms. Hughes stated she has a lot of sympathy for these people's argument. Ms. Modig atated she also has a lot of sympathy with the probTem, but she would be more comfortable with the rezoning if the petitioners had some type of plans. MOTION BY MR, WHAR7i�N��SECONDED BY MS. SCNNABEL, TO RECOMMEND TO�CITY COUNCIL� DSNIAL OF REZONING REQUEST ZOA N80-06 BY W. G. DpTY AND GARY A. WELLNER. Ms. Schnabel stated she felt the neighbors had a lot of valid arguments. She was not convinced they would be any happier with sanething under M-1, but they also did not seem to be happy with R-3. There did not seem to be any alternatives, other than R-1, and she had not heard the petitioners expressing the opinion that they would wish to change the rezoning to R-1. For that reason, she would go a7ong with denial. Ms. Hughes stated that, rather than deny the rezoning request, she would rather have a motion to continue the item and ask the petitioners to come back with some plans. Denial leaves the problem of M-1, and she was convinced that M-1 was not a good use for that site. Chairman Harris deciared a 10-minute recess at 9:55 p.m. MOTION BY MS. HUGHES, SECONDED BY MS. MODIG, T0. CONTINUE REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #BO-06,� BY W. G. A�TY RND GARY A. WELLNER: REZONE TXE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCELS FROM M-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRZAL AREAS) TO R-3 (GENERAL MCILTIPLE FAMTLY DWELLSNGS): THAT PART OF BLOCKS�B AND 9,�LOWELL ADDITION SO FRIDLEY PARK, LYING SOUTX OF THE NORTH LINE OF SYLVAN H.iLLS PLRT 8� TOGETHER WiTX THE EASTERLY ONE-HALF pF VACATED EI,M STREET,�AND THAT PART OF LOTS 1 AND 2� BiOCK 7, LOWELL � ADDITION TO FRIDLEY PARK, LYING�SOUTHERLY OF TXE WE&TERLY NALF OF VACATED STREET, LOCASED.SOUTH OF MISSISSIPPI 5TREET N.E.� AND EAST OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND TO REQUEST�TNAS THE PETITIONERS COME BRCK WITH PLANS, DRRWINGS� ELEVATIDNS, WHATEVER IS POSSIBLE� TO TRY TO EXPI,XIN WHAT IS TO GO ON THAT PROPERTY. � - � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 21,.1981 PAGE 9 UPON A�VOICE�VOTE� ALL�VOTING.AYfi, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLA�Rfi'D THE MOTION CARRZED UNRNIMOUSLY. � Mr. Narris stated Rezoning Request ZOA #80-06 was continued until the Feb. 4 Planning Commission meeting. 3. VACATION RE UEST, SAV #80-14, BY W. G. DOTY AND GARY A. wELLNER: Vacate t at part of Minnesota Street, as laid out in Lowel A ition to Fridley Park; or Mercury Drive, as laid out in Sylvan Hil7s Plat 3, now known as Satellite Lane, lying West of the Northerly extension of the West l�ine of Starlite Blvd., also being the East line: of Lot 1, Block &, Sylvan Hills Plat 3. MOTION BY MR. WHAR2+ON� SECONDED BY MS. SCHNABEL� TO CONTINUE VACATION REQUEST� SAV /(80-24� BX W. G. DOTY AND GARY R. WELI�NSR. . UPON A VOICE YOTE� ALL VOTINC�AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY�. � � . � � Mr. Harris stated this would also be continued.until the Feb. 4 meeting. MOTION BY MS. SCHNRBEL, SECONDED BY MS. MODIG,.TO�MOVE ITEM H6, "SPECIRL CONSIDERATION OF SECTION 205.257,.CREEK RND RIVER.PRESERVATION DSSTRiCT'J 2b ITEM 4 ON THE AGENDA. . UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING RYE, CHAIRMI�N HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � � � ' � - A. SPECIAL CONSIDERATION OF SECTION 205.157, CREEK AND RIVER PRESERVATION DISTRICT: Mr. Boardman stated it had been their intent to get this section accomplished with the Zoning Code, but due to the timetable, they have to pull the Flood Plain Ordinance out of the Zoning Code and recodify it based on input received from the Federal Government. If this is not adopted by Mar. 2, 1981, all of the hauses in the flood plain will lose their eligibility for subsidized flood plain insurance. Mr. Harris asked how this ordinance was different from the one they had reviewed in the Zoning Code. Mr. Deblon stated there were a few different definitions,and language changes. Mr. Boardman stated that, basically, there were reference changes and just minor changes. They are not changing any requiremer,ts. They still have the flood fringe that is buildable as long as it is tiuilt within the regulations. There is one change, and that is the Moore Lake Area. He stated the Flood Insurance Plan designated Moore Lake area as,a flood plain area. PLANNIN6 COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 21, 1981 PAGE 10 Mr. Deblon stated they were looking for a management concept for the Moore Lake area, but it is still unresolved as far as the Watershed District. This would a71ow them to build in the flood plain of Moore lake. The Watershed D9strict's policy is that there is no encroachment of building in any flood plain, so they are working with the Watershed District on this item. Mr. Boardman stated he needed approval of this document and submission to City Council. Mr. Harris stated that if there were no substantial changes and it really doesn't affect any land, other than the Moore Lake area, he did not see any problem with it. MOTSON BY MR, WHRRTON, SEGt�NDED BY MS. HUGHES� TO APPROVE AND SEND Tp CITY - COUNCIL THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED: "SECTION 205.157, CREEK AND RIVER PRESERVATSOIV DISTRICT". Ms. Schnabel stated that on page 6, Iiem #1, Structures, under 205.3105 Additional Restrictions, should be rewritten as the wording a�as not clear. Ms, Schnabel stated that on page 6 and page 8, it stated that first the Appeals Commission would be handling a17 variances, and on page 8`it stated that the Planning Commission would hear alt variances. This shou7d be rewritten. Mr. Boardmatt stated these will be rewritten to fol]ow the City's process. Ms. Schnabel stated that on page 7, Item �3-A under Application for Permit, the word "following" should be deleted. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING RYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECL�iRED.TXE LYJCUMENT APPROVED AS AMENDEA� � � � � Mr. Boardman stated he appreciated the fast action on this by the Planning Commission. If the Planning Commission members had any further questions, they could give him a call as he would still have time to make modifications before it goes to Lity Council. 5. RECEIVE JANUARY 8, 1981, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AU?HORITY MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. WHRRTON., SECONDED BY MS.�MODIG� TO RECEIVE THE JAN. 8� 1981, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT RUTHORITY MINUTES. � � UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN XARRIS DECLRRED�THE MOTION CRRRIED UNRNIMOUSLY. � 6. RECEIVE JANUARY 13, 1981, APPEALS COMMISSION MINU7ES: MOTSON BY MS..SCHNABEL, SECONDED BY MS. HUC,HES� TO RECEIVE THE JAN. 13, 1981, - APPEALS�COMMISSION MINUTES. � UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING RYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 21, 1981 PAGE 11 7. CONTINUED: CaNSIDERATION OF A PROPOSED NOISE 4RDlNANCE Mr. Boardman stated that the Commission members were given copies of the revised Naise Ordinance, These are revised from comments made at staff level. Mr. Deblon reviewed the Proposed Noise Ordinance with the Cott�nission. (Mr. Wharton left the meeting at 11:05 p.m.) On page 3, 124.06, Item l, the Comnission recomnended that "comfort, repose, health, peace, or safety" be changed to "health, safety, and general welfare". On page 5, Item H, the Commission recommended the deletion of the words, "Opening Boxes". MOTION BY MS. HUGHES, SECONDED BY MS. SCHNABEL, 21� CONTINUE TNE CONSIDERATION OF R PROPOSED NOISE ORDINANCE. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HRRRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 8. CONTINUED: PUBLIC HEARI �R 205 OF THE F MOTION BY MS. SCHNABE'L, SECONDED BY MS. MODIG� TO CONTINUE AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THfi FRIDLEY CITY CODE. �UPON A VOICE VOTfi, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRiNAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED [JNANIMOU5LY. . . ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MS. SCHNABEL� SECONDED BY MS. HUGHES, TO ADTOURN THE MEETING.� UPON A VOICfi VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRI5 DECLARED THE JRNUARY 21, 1983� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RDJOURNED AT 11:35 P.M. Respectfully s�. �c.E � ^sli Lyn Sa a Recording Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 21, 1981 NAME Michael J. Larson Marijane Tessman Linda J. Severt Jerald Severt Tom Hartfiel Mary Hartfiel Paulette Reid Judy Kidder Bill Kidder Mary Auger Dennis A. Johnson Caroline R. Johnson Mrs. Jerome Christenson Doris E. Knutson Nerris E. Knutson Walter Shupien Barbara Aspenson Charles Aspenson Jim Benson Robert Lee ADDRESS 6390 Starlite Blvd. 6390 Starlite Blvd. 100 Satel7ite Lane 100 Satel7ite Lane 120 Sylvan Lane 120 Sylvan Lane 101 Sylvan Lane 6360 Starlite Blvd.. 6360 Startite Blvd. 6348 Starlite Blvd. 6336 Starlite Blvd. 6336 Starlite Blvd. 6260 Starlite Blvd. 6300 Starlite Blvd. 6300 Stariite Blvd. 6299 Trinity Dr. 6370 Starlite Blvd. 6370 Starlite Blvd. 2940 Minnehaha, Minnetonka l30 Satellite Lane ! _� .�.�_� ,�. �.._ ���� .,r':"��71LAif%��ii`f����b G. W. PASCHKE PROPERTIES 7458 COMMERCE CI32CLE EAST, P�RIDLEY. MN 55438 TP:LEFI;ONE ftl8 591-BinB January 16, 1981 Mr. Dick Narris Chairman, Planning Commission City of Fridley Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Dear Dick: I am unable to be at the meeting to express my feelings at the second hearing on the rezoning of Lots 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, Paco Industrial Park. I have given this matter much thought over the last few weeks since the first hearing. As you know, this property will be developed. 'fhe Park opened less than two years ago. L feel if we give it reasonable time, future development will be satisfactory to all. In my opinion the best plan would be for Lots 2 and 3 to remain commer- cial with commercial property such as the post office, a medical clinic, good restaurant, Capp Homes, etc. I feel Lots 4, 5 and 6 would make a good indus- trial site, which if done properly, would not distract from the Park to the south, the office building to the north or the rest of the industrial property to the west. Rezoning the entire property from corranercial to industrial and construct- ing two buildings would not be acceptable to me. In my opinion there should be a commercial buffer between the office building and the industrial area. I feel the property does not meet any of the requirements for re2oning. (Hardship or need.) GWP:smh Sincerely, G. W ASCHKE PROPER I �C� G ald W. Paschke L��A��� � �� PU6LIC HEARING R[FORE THE PLANNING COt�tISSION 14 A NOTICE is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearin9 of the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on 4Jednesday, January 21, 1981 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 P.M. for the purpose of : Consideration of a request by W. G. Doty and Gary A. Wellman (ZOA #80-06) to rezone the following described parcels from M-1 {light industrial areas} to R-3 (general multiple family d�dellings): That part of Blocks 8 and 9, Lowell Addition, lying South of the North line of Sylvan Hills Plat 8 extended in a Westerly direction to the West boundary of said Block 8 and lying Westerly of the plat of Sylvan Hills Plat 8, together with the Easier7y one-half of vacated Elm Street, and That part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 7, Lowell Addition to Fridley Park, lying Southerly of tF�e 4lesterly extension of the North line of the plat of Sy7van Hills Plat 8, together with the Westerly half of vacated Elm Street, All tying in the South ha]f of Section 15, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. Generally located South of Mississippi Street N.E. East of the Burlington Morthern right-of-way. Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at this meeting. � RICHARD H. HARRIS CHAIRMAN PLANNING COhSMISSION Publish: �anuary 7, 1981 January 14, 1981 .T. •t^°a . m � CITY OF PRIDLEY PfINNESOTA PI.ANNI�NG/� ,A Z�O-NI G FORM NUhiBER ��j'�%"�� 1 n �I,l� . X. APPLICANT'S SIGNA _. � Address ��7q UniveLsity Ave N_E. Telephone Number 571-6441 PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE Address 6379 University Ave. N.E, 15 . t' I . TYPE OF REQUEST � Rezoning Speciai Use Permit Approval of Premin- inary $ Final Plat � Streets ox Alley Vacatipns Other Telephone Number 57i-644i .� FeeL�s Receipt No.!�/� Stxeet Location of Property Stari i te � SateA i te Ln Legal Description of Property ( attaChed ) Present Zoning Classification M_� Existing Use of Property ��sht Indys. Acreage o£ Property 2,3 Descrihe briefly the proposed zoning classification or type of use and improvement proposed R-3 � mu 1 t i p 1 Y re s i dent i s 1 �1�� ��%�.�.-. � rl�z� ,P�-�1Z`"�� Has the present applicant previously sought to rezone, p2aC, obtain a lot split or vari.ance or special use permit on the subject site or part of it? yes x no. What was. requested and when? The undersigned understands that: (a} a list of all residents and owners of property within 300 f.eet (350 feet for rezoning) must be attached to this application. (b) This application must be signed by all o�aners of the Froperty, or an explanation given why this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any defect in the proceedings resu2ting from the failure to list the names and addresses o£ all residents and property owners of property in question, belongs to the undersigned. A sketch of proposed property and structure must be dratian and attached, showing the following: 1. North Diraction. 2. Location of proposed structure on the lot. 3. Dimensions of property, proposed structure, and front and side setbacks. 4. Street Names. 5. Location and use o£ adjacent existing buildings {within 300 fect) The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. DATE Date Filed SIGNATURE � (AYPLICANT) Date of Hearing Planning Commission Approved City Council kpproved (dates) Denied (dates) Denied 16 PU6LIC HEARING 4EfORE 7HE PLANNING COMMIS5ION NOTICE ishereby 9�ven that there will be a Publia Hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, February 4, 1981 in the Gouncil Chamber at J:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of a request for a Speeial Use Permit, SP #80-13, by Walter J. Mi11er, per Section 205.051, 2, A, of the Fridley City Code, to allow the construction of a second accessory building, a 24 ft. by 30 ft. detached garage, located on Lot 8, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 21, the same being 945 Mississippi Street N.E. Ariy arid all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. RICHARD H. HARRIS CHAIRMAN PLANNING COA1t4ISSI0N Publish: January 21, 1981 • January 28, 1981 CIT1' 0� PRIDI,L•Y MiNNHSOTA PLANNING AND ZONING FOFM NUh16GR ` ��li : �3 � i' l' % APPLTCANT'S SIGNATUkE �! / G ��� � Address �� �� T Sy j SS i,t�^ l� i S7 � Telephone Numhez �� �/ - a23e =' ' 1% TYPE OP REQiIEST Rezoning � 5pecial Use Permit Approval of Premin- inary f� Final Plat / PROPERTY OIYNER'S SIGNATUKE l/ `/ Streets or Alley � Vacati.ons . Address �/ � i' S.0 i SS � e�,K1/ �� � Other Telephone Number c�' %/-�1 ,S ds' Fee �{�, p i� Q `/ Recei t Mo, Street Location of Propexty %/ �j �/ ci �� C Legal Description of Froperty �. O� 8 .� �r�J i7E {� .� u� I� L+ri Jr u� Present Zoning Classification�,_Existing Use of Property r e-.S'1 � P Y� C� Acreage of( �Property :/ v� Desc.r,�i�be bri���t e proposed zoning ciassification �G.t-hn.�l Cu.c;�,.��men'"t ro� y� � S�/ h G �Q Y' Q�[ D or type of use and impr p p i t V� �i �1 _ Ce , p�.f= ,�—'�/ / O �� Ll S� o� Cd � �0" r Gt 4 c° ,b j� q^. 7 � i�as the present applicant previwsly sought to rezone, plat, obtain a lot spliY or variance or special use permit on tlie subject site or part of it? yes�o. What was requested and when? /V p The undersigned understands that: (a) a list of all residents and owners of property within 300 feet (350 feet for rezoning) must be attached to this application. (b) This application must be signed by all owners of the property, or an explanation given why this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any defect in the proceedi� resulting from the failure to list the names and addresses of all residents and property owners of property in question, belongs to the undersigned. A sketch of proposed property and structure must be drawn and attached, showing the folloi�ing: 1. North Uirection. 2. Location of propo'sed structure on the lot. 3. Dimensions of property, proposed structure, and front and side setbacks. 4. Street Names, 5. Location and use of adjacent existing buildings (Hithin 3�0 feet). The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this appiicatiQn are true and correct. / AATE �„�( '��SIGNATURE � %� r� � - PP L IC,�N'C� ) �%y��� Date Filed ' Date of licaring Planning Commission Apl�roved City Council Approved (dstes) Dcnicd (dates) Denicd MAILING LIST SP #80-13> Walter J. Miller second accessory 6uilding Hilary L. and Doris J. Mayers 969 Mississippi Street N.E. Fridley> Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. John Kurak 6547 Oakley Drive N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Peter Eisenzimner 6535 Qakley Orive N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Jeffrey Gustafson 6558 Oakley Drive N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Donald Swanson 6550 Oakley Drive N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Ronald Bloom 6542 Oakley Drive N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 � Mr. & Mrs. James Tauer 6534 Oakley Drive N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Fredrick Brandt 453 Mississippi,Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 5543� Mr. & Mrs. Walter J. Miller 945 Mississippi Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Edward Berntson 925 Mississippi Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Jeffrey R., Timothy L, and Robert J. Gustafson 935 Mississippi StreEt N.E. fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Wayne Brodal 931 Mississippi Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Planning Commission 1/20/81 Mr. & Mrs. Gary Lofquist. 891 66th Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Gerald Johnson 6475 Able Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & P1rs. Dell Quimet 932 Mississippi Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Peter Viger 952 Mississippi Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Warren Swenson 968 Mississippi Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 ZU � �_,y! uloc� aa n xtw'-"Ei nx w. �w.v<ua�i � i%Ylp L1N[ P/.1111 ��� �� 1 �� I� �s1C1r i �k,i ....�.<,. �—=�} x[ish.e STREET MA.P-CtTY OF FRIDLEY O a333 6.66 � � � � � i ,� � ti's " * :° 3 : , . e.,. � � d;. � � . i '. °"'j� _ ` � 1�' `��� � r � ,~ .'' , �. ,, ., � ��fi .r �,.si,�t7• � �(/ � '�a �Pe.,If . � � � I�3b0� ' ���� .. • � .� � % �. / ;�o��r i ai ' 3. Vi•\ V ; � y � � d 6 y' =S , �:!�..ar; � ' 20 �' � , r�.. � •Y: ��. I r.Q � Z� IJ �- I'F'ti 5.� , `f` / l/ /��9 � �:(f �1 ; o'' ;C7�i J' AV.�N E. ; _ , Lr � �. .,.C� < ., , • E— e. y��^f�.` � t s i lirJ! 1 . .. ; �\ . � � . :J..� "'"'!sl---- �r . :r�, ? f1J z %•• � w\ a .,� ; � : Ha ti;. ��` {y'•� . ;', �--- _."--.�L_-'-•. 's f' . j' � ,.�,�i P ;; > ,�s<� ; � ; t �^ � Z• • � � : s • G� . ` .iis �s � , Q] n•�7J'He'�1).. � .r � O E� '.....�__ � J»•Z,s°� A " tS U :. ' O � C2i'.Qu�� p 2.' ' • 4 0 w t• Y �T} 'V �.`.: ♦ \ ` � rG�� �� �• ' 8 F � � , . a Ca.r~ /OS � M•S�>6,,' . �x� ,�_ I = �s �� �rBG . � 1 � __ .ff3B �'� . ' t�n (zs3ol tzs�� �6�� .� '" `Z��' � � ogo �� 8 :�: � � , W=. � � �� o ,8 H � � 2Jl ,� +•, A Q� ti• ;' � �seo) . ' Ga � , . .. 19,P*1 _�i � � <in�l .ae—�-1._.H"!'j,,,,1�5 iAi� rt L�a1V �va7 ,i �. —j'i�i"� � iGT: �--'J � 1 ! . x's3 0 �. � � - . �. � � - l�, ii . :. r c. ';, , 2 � . 3 � .;>s; i � ' � F .^^+ �. ; '" �- �. N� � � '� �' i5so' , � 26 � � :,:� ` ` �;,,, ' 5� •, � i i _, � , �,.�: . � � . . I I � � /J� :Y p; Z3 iSu 4 �. 22: ,;�.j. J " _ !s - 6 a �_ \ o�::� %. ;� � /Se f�_�• :i `--��— • s � � ' , . . , 'YJ � , z ' 3 ' _ /:.�: �� pi 'y ) �i . � ~ I . `� �! .. � _ _ _ _ ��__'T :_sr� :. .r � ,vvs • •• . P� y ^b�. �c J . sri , p �r � '�f � �:��1 RD _ _,� ,..-: Ao _ .E t' l- � a ��.� �� �- . y� - / . . =1 �°�.;., ' �>> . � i. .e. � �� ; . �; � 1:: 3 .� �.� " q. ���; ,�i � E'� ti � v � � ; -_ � � :>: '�.. .. � . 1 - l"' ' � 64TH 1�VE �1 E 0 .� � Y �� '6 : .I. � . r�s, r n-- -----�-- �� � � ° 3, � � � I � ' , ! ""„"'"" ?. � �Q ^+W � 0 s . . ➢ Sx�q� . \ _ '� �. �'_"" ' i o .' 3 � � o ; , c � :Y�� � � � � ;�. �if n , �nzlJ � .lra '-:i>ss �r'Ver2:j � � � � �:' By� ,�, y �/'� t�`+ o � � � 3•� �` 2 t�mq � n jI� �.: �l%' 6I„� ` f � „h� F t ' � � p ��.. � �»J �(n t , �� fa ! j �• ,� __. . i....'re f f6 LJ�1y._�.n1�V ' y� ."�—��.�..��. •��L p ' : i'a:l 'f - _ 4 N ' . 1S i j)" •! 'a _ r � >, . '� ^Y�t . . .- . : .:�z.`./eyi � � . � ' � �j � . � � ),_>.� ;; ' � ��; ` A U D f T'R S cs� t : ;<<:� � o _ ; 12 ' z � _.,�� --'i;, Q N o ' `;��` ... _._ }- _ i� � . -'1 :) : ° .. " . � � � 3_ ° �`�, • Z � � • ,J, rz ,,_ � � �� � ` �. ���_ /��Q� ' � . �o u_�V n � . ,� „-:: , r.•. c. _ , : �.r � , -2���s s. �% l � N �iZ�:._.—SSIPPT S7: � i.. 21 .�,�„ NOTICE is hereby given of the City of Fridley Wednesday, February 4, of : PUQL7C NEARING (iEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION that there will be a Pu51ic Nearing in the City Ha17 at 6431 University 19II1 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 22 of the Planning Commission Avenue Northeast on p.m. for the purpose Consideration of a Preliminary Plat, P.S. �81-01, Midwest Addition, by Louis J. Namlin, being a replat of Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 11, Outlots U, V, KK, LL, MM and NN, Great Northern Indu5trial Center, Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, containing an area of 10.59 acres, more or less, Being registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of Title Nun�ber 46816, and all that part of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 27, To�rnship 30 North, Range 24 West, of the Fourth Principal Meridian, Anoka County, Minnesota, descr9bed as foilows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 10, Great Northern Industrial Center - fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota; thence Easterly along the South line of said Lot 1, a distance of 101.1,8 feet; thence Easterly and Northeasterly along a tangential curve concave to the North having a radius of 449.28 feet, said curve being 10.00 feet Northerly of and parallel with a proposed 12°30' r�ailroad spur line to its intersection with the East line of said Great Northern Industrial Center � Fridley for the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continuing Northeasterly along said curve having a ra�ius of 449.28 feet and a central angle of 29°31', 231.45 feet to a point of cusp with a line 35.00 feet Westerly of, as measured at a right angle ofi radial to the center line of the most 4lesterly railroad track, as the same now exists, pf the Burlington Northern Inc.; thence Southerly 754.28 feet to the Southeast corner of said Great Northern Industrial Center - Fridley; thence Northeriy 580.55 feet a1ong the East line of said Great Northern Industrial Center -.Fri�ley �o the point of beginning and there terminating, containing an area of 1.07 acres, more or less, and all that part of Outlot MM, Great Northern Industrial Center- Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying Easterly of a line 35.00 feet Westerly, as measured at a right angle._or radial to the center line of the most Westerly track, as the same no�a exists, of the Burlington Northern Inc., containing an area •of 0.02 acre, more or less, Also that portion of the Easterly side of Parcel B herein that lies within a distance of 35.00 feet from the center line of the most k�esterty tracks, as the same now exist, of said Burlington Northern Inc., as measured lJesterly of and at a right angle or radial to said railroad track center lines, containing an area of 0.11 acre, more or less, and a railroad easement, along over, upon or across a parcel of land descri6ed as follows: All that part of lot l, Block 10, and Outlot JJ, Great Northern Industrial Center - Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota lying Southerly of the follo�aing described line; Conm�encing at the South�aest Corner of said Lot 1, thence Easterly along the South line of said Lot 1, a�istance of 101.18 feet to a point herein referred to as Point A; thence Easterly and Northeasterly along a tanc�ential curve concave to tlie North having a radius of 449.28 feet and a central angle of 33°18'28", 261.18 feet, said curve being 10.00 feet Northerly r-- � _ . I P.S. d81-01, Page 2 2� of and para11e1 vriLh a proposed 12°�0' railroad spur line to its intersection with the East line of said Great Northern Industrial Center - fridley for the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence l�lesterly to Point A and'there terminating, containing an arca of 0.15 acre, more or less, all lying in the North Half of Section 27, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. Generally locaLed at 5101 Industrial t31vd. N.E. ,Anyone des'iring to be heard in reference to the above matter may be heard at /'the above time and place. RICHARD H. HARRIS CHAIRMAN PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: January 21, 1981 January 28,• 1981 � PLAN�ING ANU 7.ONING FOlthl , hUh1AER ����� -D / _ APPLICA.'r'1''S SIGNA7URE � , . �f ?�?�'--� • � AdJress �D/ — c ,� .�; s , �. • ��� Y/5/ Telephone Number 33/- 79.5�/ ' — �;, "fYPF; OF RfiQUE51' Rezoning Special Use Pei��iE �_ Approval of Premin- inary f� Fina1 Flat PROPLRTY OI4AiER'S SIGNA7'URE ��/�E Streets or Alley Yacations Acidress �'4 �� C Other Telephone n`umber J��E � yO ��_�_�! Fee �Q Receipt No. � �I � � Street Lucation of Property ��`7 '� rncft.��r`a. ���J� Legal Description of Property �� �-rY��� � 1��� Present Zoning Classification Y°`"2` Existing Use of Property ,,� �-C-� Acreage o£ Proparty �•�� [•�� � o£ use and improvement ���Jl. Describe briefly the proposed zoning classification Has the present applicant previously sou�ht to reaone, plat, obtain a loC split or , V'Li%2RCe or s�ec:sl use �°�-:�i:t on the subject�site or part of it? yes � no• i�iiat was requested and when? r '1'he undersigned understands that: (a) a list of alI residents aad owner� of property within 300 feet (350 feet'for rezoning) must be attacfied to this applica.tion. ; (b) This application must be signed by all owners of the property, or an explanation given why this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any deFect in the proceedings resu2ting from the failure to list the names and addresses of all residents and property owners of property in question, belongs to the undersigned. A si:etch of proposed property and structure must be drawn and aEtached, snowing the �� following: 1. North Direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on the lot. 3. Dimensions of property, proposed structure, and front and side setbacks. _ 4. Street Names. S. Location and use of adjacent existing buildings (within 300 feet) The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. • DATE /f ��A/ SIGNATURE .;/lt��.u+.-� F�� — APPLjCA.'� Date F.iled Date of Ncaring � Plannin� Commission Approved City Council Approvcd (clates) Denied ' (dates) Denied ...______..._.__..._._....._�__.-" --"_ ....... .... :.___..,.. . ......._ .. f...'_.-'- . - . ....ts,.,.� Planning Commission 1-20-87 25 MAILING LIST P.S. N81-01 MIDWEST ADDITION Burlington Narthern 176 East 5th Street St. PauT, Mn 55101 F.M.C. Corporation Lega1 Department �Sth & Marshall Fridley> Mn 55421 Louis J. Hamlin Midwest Printing Company 801 9th Street S.E. Minneapolis, Mn 55414 ( ♦ � LOOH N�PiDf1 wq�IMr'�11 _If. �l'..�• • W � i �oca�o� f . ; s 2 � � prn�w NY � ..,� �' .../+. �'� .. .... " �� .:�� f 1• i .� ��erin�ii_;,� � F,; L Y:� � r �N � � ... � !;".= ° � � .xoa+ �n �" �icwZra ce. rK•roua G 9PMIN L�IL YMK lan��l � 3 •n.�� x 0 � 26 ��������U � �`�"1�f�-�,�1 °..�..�, �. � � �,�,g STREET MA.P-CITY OF FRIDLEY 0 � � $333 � � 6,666 .�. �� �._ i �� � ; �i O _• ; � . . ' ' . .. . . • . , . .. - . ptL .. �/ � 3� . . . . ... . I. : �u . . , I�` Z i :, �:, C" f;y � � t' , a `' r •: ..,��-.�_�_ Q . , �� • -Y � � � `< 6�1-- -� o �r -- � � � . � � '_ � " , -� � I - `'- ' !` i . .... � r . �5.� i . t � �,� .� ; r _' . . ��"— ]� ic � l _ ..._...�.^-._' r : p a f J � _ �� � M/[It� �� u 2 . y '' ���1 . '/ 'J J I" - .' 1 t 9 x I i. �.y I' - �lt� l . . �� . ', . . . �F � }\ x . . Y � .. 1 L ' . _. __ N� l -Tii.v7l—i/�_/[(f _ __#.� � ' � . � � 1 f � S M! B f N�1 �' O t ^ r,b? � 04 �. Q C. I� Q � ' __ _ _ _1 � lrau ar I.rr.M,� ' . ,'4 °� � � . �� w.�. � � �i:i V I y. �t , ^'\: 'Q� p� . �j� vi �. a p^\ - � c. ; t�i �. E.• �� j 'i :y 1� c3f `1•: mro ����'.� � i .z �`c� R ♦J G � �, . a f . • _ . .1 '�, �� $ � •� ` �� n . \ . . ° . . � � � � { ��_� ' . � - - . . .d � <=" I ` . s - � 'p.. 't.x� � �y �r . 1: -` � oarr. ' i _s,i I� " � � 4 � i.o.rqi. } ' ,t . a `,,`' _ __'_'"'" "_�__'_ �� • . ' < _<':�: r� � 1 ��=1 � . • � - -:� t I fS I �:7. J ?.' �a � � 3 I , � - <IFii ��,� 1 _ � ; g f I: `e' I - � .= O --r-- ; . � � .a; :i .. a: i - ;[ �; � �Q I ,u ',' v.l� � L q - ._ � v`.i � 3 .' � y� r.._'"_ . . "�;� � ._ ____ O I . aetv ��(. �_ •Z ' _ _ •,¢ . . _._—' ' i:Tisi: �� ���f1 . �� -' � 3 � ""' 4 'I ' l% ; g � i � _._. __. � � , la � � +� y . h W u z2 �.o ? u i`_Y, : ¢ t°; � �. u � � .,�Y.• . . .: u �. u I 1 . ��l Q ,�^ , % Q • ' �^�'i c . . . . ...nr V.::.: i ��:. . . l'Of:f /��f.W I N . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . � � ii: �iV... .._ .F"IB h�/ft.,CU( .� .l l: I ' , ` � � . . _ . - . .. - i t f � � i � ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE RFLATIiJG 70 P�OISE, PROVIDIPI6 fOR THE PREVENTION API4 ELIMI�JATIOP! OF EXCESSIVE AND UPlNECESSARY NOISE, A�'D IMPOSIMG A PENALTY FOR UIOLATION SECTION 124.01. DEFINITIONS : 1, pir Girculation Device means a mechanism designed and used'for the con ro e ow o a�r used in ventilation, co�ling, or conditioaing, including, but not limited to, central and window air conditioning units. 2. C�ty Official A noise-control officer, police officer, or any other duly appo�—'n�representative of the City as designated by the City Manager. 3. Decibel. Oecibel is a unit of sound pressure level, abbreviated tl6. 4. dBA: dBA is a unit of sound level, dBA is the weighted pound pressure level by the use of the A metering characteristic and weighting as specified in ANS1 Specification for Sound Level Meters, SL4-1971, which is hereby incorporated by reference. For the purpose of those regulations, dBA is used as a measure of human response to sound. 5. Exhaust System means a combination of components which provides for enc ose ow of exhaust gas from engine_parts to the atmosphere. 6. L1Q. L70 is the sound percent of the time procedures approved by Control Agency. level, expressed in dBA, which 15 ezceeded ten for a one hour survey, as measured by test the Executive Director of the Minnesota Pollution 7. �L Q L50 is the sound level, expressed in dBA, which is exceeded �ifty percent of the time for a one hour survey, as measured by test procedures approved by the Executive Director of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 8. Noise. Noise means any sound not occurring in the natural environment, inclu3ing, but not limited to, sounds emanating from aircraft and highways, and industrial, commercial and residential sources. 9, person means any human being, any municipa)ity.or other governmental or po i ical subdivision, or any other public agency, any public,or private corporatio�, any partnership, firm, association or other organization, any receiver trustee, assignee, agent or other legal representative of any of the foregoing, or any other legal entity./��d�/¢¢@$/pf¢y/,ip¢a��¢/ zr�ia���a���z�iova����m�iQ��zv��ia���¢�� 10. Sound. Sound is an oscillation in pressure, stress, particle i� spTcement, particle velocity, etc., in an elastic or partially etastic medium, or the superposition.of such propagated alterations.� � -r!'"' \ Pdge 2 -- ORDINItPJCE N0. � 29 11.` Sodnd Pressure Level •(SPL). Sound Pressure Level is 20 times the ogar�t m to t e ase 0 o the ratio of tiie pressure of a sound, p, to the reference pressure, pr. For the purposes of these regulations, the reference pressure shall be 20 micronewtons per square meter (20 � N/m2). In equation form, Sound Pressure Level in units of decitiels is expressed as. SPL (d6) = 20 log �pP�Pr 12. Sound Receiving Unit means a unit of property or a building containing a Qerson, us�ness, activity, animal life, or Qroperty which is affected by noise or noise pollution, SEGTION 124.02. RECEIVING LAND USE STANDARDS 1. The sound level requirements of this section shall apply at the property or zoning lines of the sound receiving unit. Measurements may be made at any location on the property for evaluation purposes and to aid in the enforcement of other sections of this Chapter. 2. The sound levels as stated below shall be the highest sound levels permitted in each of the zoning distriets as defined in Chapter 205 of the Fridley Zoning Code. Zoning Districts R-1, R-2, R-3 C-1, C-1S, C-2, C-2S, CR1; CR2; P M-�1, M �� Day L50 L10 (7 a.m. - 10 p.m.} 60 65 65 70 75 80 Night L50 L10 (10 P.m..- 7 a.m.) 50 55 65 70 75 80 3. Sound levels resulting from cumulative travel of motor vehicles on state and county highways and railroads are exempt from these Receiving Land Use Standards but not other sections of this ordinance relating to motor vehicles and railroads. This does not exempt individual motor vehicles � from any and all federal, state, or local regulations. It is the intent of the City to reduce higMaay noise in the various land areas surrounding highways to or below the requirements of this section when and wherever possible. SECTION 124.03, SOURCE EMISSION S7ANDARDS 1. Motor Vehicles Noise Limits. n. V�aP9u�RS. �v�vy�v��Ymv�y���¢I��s�ti,�)x��z���J���v���i����s���v��d���z6��� f�t�1 i7�ti/�Ni����l'A4�6�FA9t����bJ�bj3¢tsi���7��8/�N�I ��Y�d!da�i�����l�Ax�lYk�� �v�n���iv¢��¢��i�����i���i��i��ia������zi�p�baz�v�iz�i�r�v���ie�¢�����e �d/N�48N�,1/A4�S�l/�Nd/N�/��VBDt�/��f��a/d��/Alv�dfP7�V/2��4��1/pY���BIlOY �is�,�7�Y/��Y7¢�/��OAl�/u`�Xr�V/Yl4�F�1�/��/�/SxV��x/0P/t���1 Di1+0s�t //7E�@/¢��ANSX $�g���/BN�Ia/��x/��+�xf��/dr���d��/A/�����ld�����9/��/¢r`���T30�/�4�v+�1! KY�7�lp��Y�YIY��i�X�/SN��1/�x/���/Y1v��8/�P/�c9d����¢�/w�xb�/SN�a/���Y�/�A� ¢s��i���pY/�r�/�YY�����/���lK��xIFN/SN¢�IAX�X�/4fl��q,�FP/�8/Yfi/drPY�AX a�v�v�vu+�������i��si�rv�+i��z�vtw�ixt1�i�fiz�r��ri�rixi��iv������t , P�9e 3-- 0�41NANCE N0. 3� ��/p�����/�N�XX/N�V�/9dV/�A��l/SAdX/dY/�Yf�YlY�N/SE��/0Y/�S�l��/��/l t���Y/���1���/��t/�d�17��/X�AX/YAXxX/K0/����7�/W�x�/Y�¢/������ f��0xF4��1�8/p�����¢0/N�/���/�4����5����V/�9IP��a�¢/S�Y�X�• The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency M.otor Uehicle Noise Limits - 1977 (6MCAR 4.20Q4) are hereby adopted by reference. 2. ¢������a����i�����r��yj��iiav��zix����v��i�����v��iav�����i�����ti��w�ti ������z�v�i���i�z�¢v�����zv������i�a������x»��er��zi������ra��a��zfai ����zv�¢z���/����/�i/z���/����wa�/��/�xo/N����/1���X/��/K��/��ay/�r/ p�OY�lO�dB����l��l�l�,��x��¢�/�f/�9/f��Kk �, . SECTION 124.04. CENTRAL AIR COPlOITIONING EQUiPMENT No person may install or place any central air conditioning plant or e4uipment in any location without the prior approval of ,(Q,ix�/p,f��i�Jf,�J��' the c;tx. Window air conditioning units are exempt from the provisions of this subdivision, except that the noise produced by such window•units, as well as by a11 existing air circulation devices, shali be attenuated by means deemed appropriate by the �¢���iia��yvv�vy City, including, but not limited to, relocation of such units or devices, if this noise results in or contributes to a vio7ation of Section 124.02 of this ordinance. SECTION 124.05. OPERATIONAL LIMITS l. Recreational Vehicles. No person shall drive or operate any minibike or snowmo i e, as set orth in Section 703 af the City Code, or other similar recreationa ve ic e not icense or rave on pu ic streets, at any time other than 6etween 7�¢Q/��4�� 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. 2, Outdoor Power Implements. No person shall operate any outdoor power imp ement inc u, ing ut not limited to .�ower Tawn mowers,. $�f¢1A�J$f��V$> power he�ge clippers, chain saws, mu chers, garden tillers, edgers, drills, or such other imp ements des�gne pr�mari y or ou oor use, a any time other than between the hours of 7jp�lb/-}�,7 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. on weekdays and 4:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. on weeTcen�t`cs and holidays. Snow removal equipment is exempted from this provision. 3. Construction Activities. Construction work hours shall be subject to ec �ons . an , of the City Code. t1. Refuse Hauling. Refuse hauling hours shall be subject to Section 113.10 of t e C�ty Code. SEGTION 124.06. PUBIIC NUISANCE NOISES PROHIBITED 1. General. It shall be ualawful for any person to make, continue, or cause � be made or continued any distinctly and lcudly audible noise that unreasonably 1¢�ldl/NP�4�k`�Q$$dY`l��/f�V'/�NN�k�DI/�0�$k/�Y/�N�/4�4F��/ yC���{i/¢,i��1{ty annoys, disturbs, injures, or endangers the �¢yi�¢yX1 Y��PB�!/4���7��1/����P,!/�N/���A��/49/OX��Y�/v��Y4��'�1����/X���X�/¢YfY�� ¢�Tx� health, safetv and en ral vielfare of Fridle,� residents. The following acts, among others, are declared to be nuisance noises in violation of this ap�,i¢X� Ordinance but said enumeration shalt not be deemed to be exclusive. Page 4 -- ORDINANCE N0. A. � \ �o_rns�ignaling4?vices�etc. The sounding o` any���/q�yp ¢b si9naling device on any yehicle exc�t as a warninq of dan�er (i�.5.�769.f�3):;�y�x�m�s�,il��l%md�O�Q��a2!/0V/�KN�V/Y2l���d�/ �A/���/�xY�`P�/�0/A�l����/�,��Q�/�f/xl��/t�i�K�,l/�����x/�8/�/s�AA��V/ 1��VNFA��/X4��/�V�Q�;�D�/v��'/t��JA�/��/0y��18N��/��r�NAI �v��/d ��i��/ 0f1���l�N����ON��Xdld�A�l�YI��Y�N/S�wN46/0�4/%l��1����A��9(09/ �V�.Y/����/��YXd�/f�d/dv�/d�+���k�B�Y�/��d/�,�Y�R�6�r��a�/d�pFO�/�9/ x�G�al /JxG��Jf�B�/�3/R�J/��9s��,�,���/����¢�/�����x/4V��1 d��d�Z��/t��! ����/0V/�T���Y,���Y�'�/rb�/N��/0f/At��/��Y�l/�✓����d�l�Y/��a�7/ ��Y,���/d�������i�y/������J¢�i���s8�/,���/�4i�/���/09/�v��/8d�'0�/ SigN�a�a�/��YF��/W�¢A/kpAiYl�/FS/Y�v`/DG�3/V�,�B��/N�ad/N�� R��,��$l/9���d����a�!/P�9�nA/5����c�$/�x�l The�XAY��$ or using, operating or permitting x�j/t{¢//�y�y�d, the use or operation of any radio receiving set, musical instrument, phonograph, gaqinq system, b�/b�iS��` machine or other device far the production or reproduction of saund ,ip/��i�t}� in a distinctiv and loudlv audible manner as to disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of the neighborin9 inhabitants.�yJyl�j �v�Y/xiv��/Y���p/I4���Y/Y�df�7+�/i��A/N�R��B�V�/f0V/�4P��N��A�/ G�����'��I��YI���/d�����I�V/��Y8�7��Is���1��`�I��I���IV��v�l / v���¢x�i��i������ri��iv���¢�i��a�i�����,+�iv�ia�����i��i ���v�r��ia��is�a�����iy�xm���t�i���x��e��i�a�r���� C. Noisy Parties or Gatherings. The congregation or gathering of peop e rom w ic nolse emanates in a safficient volume or of such nature so as to disturb the peace, quiet, or repose of other persons. D. Loud Speakers, Amplifiers for Advertising. The using or operat�ng ���a;�`/�G$ �s¢,¢��✓�x,��f� or permitt7ng tha y�/��/ �y�i�¢y1, use or operation of any Y�d,�O/i'���,�y�t�9/��xl/D�d$12i�X/ i��p��lp1¢qf�(/p�i����p'��yf[ loudspeaker, sound amplifier, or other q1����pf¢/p,� device for the production or reproduction of sound on a street or other public ptace for the purpose of commercia a vertising or attracting t e attention of the of the public to any buiiding or structure �vhich disturbs the peace, quiet and comfort of the neighboring inhabitants. E, Animals. �,¢/�5,h,�`�p,h�/�ly�y►//I��¢�3 7he keepi'no of any animal that disturbs the comfort or repose of persons in the vicinity by its frequent or continued noise. F. Exhausts. The dischar9e or permitting the discharge into the open air of the exhaus o any steam erig�ne, 5tationary internal combustion engine or motor boat, motor vehicle, or snorimobile except through a muffler or other evice w ic wi e ective y prevent loud or explosive noises therefrom and compties vrith all applicapte state laws and regulations. Piinnesota Statute Ls4.rsii ano cne ueparzment or r+acura� Resources regulation requiring mufflers for sno�•rmobiles, 6 MCAR 1.0057 (E) (1), are adopted by reference and incorporaied in this ordinance as fully as if set out in full. 31 Page 5 -- ORDINANCE N0. 32 �. Defective Vehicle or Load. The use of any automobile, motorcycle or ve 7c e so out o repa�r, so loaded or in such manner as to create loud and unnecessary grating, grinding, ratt7ing or other noise. H. Loading, Unloading, p¢����,g/,Qb/,�5/ Unpackin9. The creation of a loud an excessive nozse in connection H�— loading or unloading or unpacking of any vehic7e. Xl R��1��fi�i����X/N�XO�/Y�Y��'�d�81//T��/���1'�ti�4N/�f/�A�/��1ff�V���a12�/ 1���XEa�/��/�G�Y/Yf���"�d�1�����1a��/0Y/�Y��A/��'l�/S�a9f�Y0���d�0/ Y�V�,��,��lNB�A/Y��%Y��Y��K,���A7/��Yv��S�B,I/�N�1dA��A/�d�/�9�/I�d����d/ x�l8a0�Av�d�iZ��lI�YA�dl�6���1�Y'/�X��Vl�7�l�Xk�V��7�/��N��X�3i�AifiA�i��d/ . �V4a1�i�&�/���R�l//f�i'�N��4x�/X��xy��2/��189/��/t+�����/����K�d/��/ V�'f�Y�7�d�/�N�/,���0b�4�����/��/YN,��/�Y�,�N���@/��/��)13/��/�fl��X/���/ ��/�NI�I dl D�D��p/Y�b1�a�8,�//���/���Y�X�AN/4f/�/���0�/Y�h�idd�/F�/Y�6XAX�0A/�1/ D��a���0zA�8K�zdz��1�9��9��'��Aa�Y����m�zmv�y�R��d���dffl�v�l 6(l ���'��8/D1��y/$�4�04I81/Q�dVY$l/Q��d����81/��`/H�����d�81//Xq�l�V�B�A�A/ ��i�a�i����s��v�i�����i�ai���i�zv���i��d����zi��i���i�a�����i 1�8����KF�N6/��`/V�,�4�/���x�N��/�qlf����di�/��v!0��1��x��G���liv�l%��! a0��11x�X/�����A��/�v��x/��NSq,���"6�8/8��v�S/���/d�B�X����/,�N/�N�N/ S�V���BIFNdF��Y�AA/���X/Y��/��v��/��/0/��k����l/�08�1YA11/Q6��Y��l/��/ ���Y�I�X���x! SECTION 124.07. EXCEPTION fOR EMERGENCY 4fORK Operations and acts performed exclusively for emergency iaork p¢�/¢y¢¢¢¢,i��/�/ �¢dj'¢�/p�f//1/�/#�¢y(�$ to preserve the safety, welfare, or public health of the citizens of the City or for emergency work necessary to restore a public service or to eliminate a public hazard shall be exempt from the provisions of this ordinance. Persons having performed emergency work u�der this section shall inform the City of the need to inititate such work or if during non-business hours of the City offices than upon resumption of business hours of the City. Any person responsible for such emergency work shall take all reasonable actions to minimize the amount of noise.��)J�G��¢�/��/y������¢p(. SECTION 124.08. POWERS FlND DUTIES OF THE NOISE CONTROL OFFICER The noise controi program established by this ordinance shail be administered by the Citv.�/Q�X�/0ff���AZ/��1�4F����/I��+/Yl��/Q���/�1�r��$��� 2. Testinq procedures. 'ihe City �yy,i¢,i�j shall adopt guidelines establishing the test procedures and instrumentation to be used in enforcing the provisions of Section 124.02 and 124.03 imposing noise standards. A copy of such guidelines shall 6e kept on file in City Ha11 and shall be available to the public for reference during office hours. _e�^. � Page 6 -- ORDINAP�CE M0. 33 3. Studiesl_ etc. 7he City�yy��,iAa shall conduct such research, monitoring, and other studies related to sound us are necessary or userful in enforcing this ordinance and reducing noise in tfie city. (A¢ 7he City shail make such i��vestigations and inspections in accordance with law as required in appiying ordinance requirements. Noise Impact Statements. The Cityq�y��,i�) may require any person applying to the City for a change in zoninq classificaLion or a permit or license for any structure, operation, process, installation or alteration or project that may be considered as a potentiai noise source to submit a noise impact statement on a{orm prescribed by the City. ��v�<iiw�i���tri��ar����i��a�+i�w��i�z����e��i���im�uei���vse������i r�¢�a+�����x����i��i�b�i¢r�:�iQ������ix������i��2�e1��a�a�i¢����������ix�i xAl��/z��/��z�0p/��/���YO�'a/xN¢/I������/�V/��Y���/�fi�X,���/���� 5. Other Powers and Duties, The City�yf,i¢��� shall exercise such other powers and perform such other duties as are reasonable and necessary to enforce this ordinance. SEC7ION 124.09, VARIANCES 7he a�Q�¢�,7g/�t}Y-��'y�/yy4{ �ity Council shali have authority, consistent with this section to grant variances from the requirements of all sections of this Ordinance./p�p/.R,�• Uariances shal] be subject to S2ction 6.141 of the City Cade. SECTION i24.]0. EhFORCEMENT NN1�Y��d�A�/��/���1$/d������Q�/$N�al/��/$N��@��/��/2qA�X�d/99a/Ai/���/QiY:�/ 2���! . y�1. Criminal Penalties. The violation of �p(�I all provisions of this ordinance except Section 124.03 Subdivision 7, shall be sub'ect to Chapter 901 of the Citv Code. ,i8/�/r��i$¢¢p;¢�p�p/��/d@�,���d/W�/�1,�F���S�X�/SX�X�/ ���z���iiT��i�r�������i�fi������aixzs�t�z����m��y�s��c�ix�i����i�����i o������s����bi��i�������i��i�������za��z�z�i�z�z�� 2. Civil Rction, 7he provisions of this ordinance may be enforced through in,7unction, mandamus, or other appropriate civil remedy. SEC7ION 124.11, SEVERABILITY If any provis�on of this ord�nance or the app7ication of any provision to a particuTar situation is heTd to be invalid by a court of competent juris- diction, the remaining portions of the ordinance and the application of the ordinance to any other situation shall not be invalidated, CITY OF fRIDLEY PARKS & RECREATION COMµiSSION MEETING 3ANUARY 14, 1981 CALL TO 4RDER: Chairperson Hughes called the January 14, 7981, Parks & Recreation Comnission meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. ROIL CALL: Met�ers Present Members Absent: Others Present: Barbara Hughes, Dave Kondrick, Dick Young, Dan Allen Jan Seeger Charles 6oudreau> Parks & Recreation �irector Bill Donahue, 1316 Hillcrest Dr. N.E. APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 10, 1980, PARKS & RECREATION CONMtISSION MINUTES: Chairperson Hu9hes declared the minutes approved as written. APPROUAL OF AGENQA: The following items were added to the agenda: "Knigfits of Columbus Annual Snow Days" - Item D under "Director's Report" °League of Women Voters" - Item A under "Chairperson's Report" "Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting Site" - Item B under "New Business" Chairperson Nugfies declared the agenda adopted as amended. 1. DIRECTOR'S REPORT: A. Nature Center Facility Update Dr. Boudreau stated they should be moving into the facility within a week. They are not moving in until some minor things are corrected to their satisfaction. He stated the different colored panel in the kell wa11 has been reptaced, and the new folding curtain for the front window has been installed. This should help provide security on the windows in the front. B. Winter Programs Dr. Boudreau stated winter registration began on Monday, �an. l2. Registration has been unbelievable, and for only the third day of registration, it is topping any expectations they had. It looks like most of the programs will have waiting lists within a week. With the waiting list, they try to accommodate these people by arranging other PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 14, 1981 PAGE 2 meeting places, other classes, or other instructors. They have the policy that non-residents must wait one week in order to let fridley residents have the first opportunity. C. Jaycee's Donation Dr. Boudreau stated he was notified on Monday by Kurt Schrupp, President of the fridley Jaycees, that the Jaycees will be forth- coming with a'donation and pledge of $6,000 to the City of Fridtey for the purchase of scoreboards at the new community park complex, with the stipulation that there 6e a sign identifying that the score- boards were purchased and donated by the Fridley Jaycees. The Jaycees hope that the City Council will receive this gift in a two- year period--$3,000 in 1981 and $3,000 in 1982. br. Boudreau stated that the Jaycees have also expressed the opinion that, even though`they do not have any money, they are willing to donate manpower for whatever is needed at the nature center facility. D. Knights of Columbus Annual Snow Days Dr: Boudreau stated this was for the Commission's information. Each year the Knights of Columbus have an annual Snow Days. They have sno�vmubiling for the nuns at the new community park complex. They have been given permission to do that with proper insurance and the po]ice have been notified. He stated he has talked to them about the lack of snow, and if there is not enough snow, that event will not be held. But, tBe skating, lunch, bingo, and other activities will all be held. He stated he wanted the Commission to know that this is another group that the City assists and works with. Dr. Boudreau stated they also made a presentation to the Knights of Columbus Board regarding the community park complex, and the Knights of Columbus Board was fairly positive in terms of a donation towards the development of the new complex. This has been taken under advise- ment, and that decision should be forthcoming within a month whether or not the Knights of Columbus will decide to help the City with that project. 2. CHAIRPERSON'S REPORT: A. League of Women Voters Ms. Hughes stated that the League of Wdmen Voters will be having two r+�etings th9s month in order to seek informati�n about the commun9ty park complex and the recreation building. Mr. Allen will be speaking to the League on Jan. 14 and possibly on Jan. 27. Mr. Allen stated he was given four points the League would like addressed: (1) why the citizens' advisory cormnittee was formed; (2) the building proposition; (3) the history of the property; and (4j the phitosophy of the Commission towards recreation. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 14, 1981 PAGE 3 Mr. Allen stated'that if the Commission members had any information regarding the Commission's philosophy, he would be gTad to hear it. Ms. Hughes stated she thought it has been fairly traditional for the Farks & Recreation Commission and the recreation staff to have the philosophy that recreation is meant to be a participatory thing, not necessarily competitive. They also don't necessarily compete to offer a program if it is being offered adequately somewhere eise. Dr. Boudreau stated the Staff's philosophy is as Ms. Hughes has stated, in that they try to fill the needs they see in the comnunity and the interests people have expressed to them that is not being offered elsewhere or being offered at too high a price. They also have a working agreement with Corrmunity Education on program offerings. Ms. Hugfies stated they also do not try to make money and they are trying to offer programs to every age group or interest group ranging from•preschoolers ta the elderly,and passive to active. Mr. Allen thanked Ms, Hughes and Dr. Boudreau for that input. He stated he wouid also mention to the League of Women Voters his concern �of-the emphasis on the neiqhborhood aspect. 3. OLD BUSINESS: A. Citizen's Adviso� Committee - Dan Allen Mr. Allen stated they have been meeting regularly. He has been very impressed with the involvement of the people. Everyone is working very hard. Jack Nansen has been doing an exceptional job in chairing the meetings. The input has been excellent, and everyone is contri- buting. He stated they have had a lat of groups talk to the committee. They have heard from Tom Myrha of Comnunity Education, the Fridley 5chool District, and Jim 6ilbert, Executive Director of the YMCA. Several members of the committee were assigned to visit different areas and report. Mr. Al1en stated they have set up a calendar and have gotten things pretty well organized as far as plans, and it looks like they are going to make the March 1 target date. Ne stated they will be going on a tour Saturday to visit the Northwest Racquet and Swim Club, the gymnasium facility at North Hennepin Community College, the Northwest YMCA, and possibly the YMCA at Arden Nills. Mr. Allen stated they will be waiting for the results of the survey sent out in the City Newsletter. They are going to start looking at priorities.and see if the needs are being met by different agencies in the area. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSI�N MEETING, JANUARY 14, 1981 PAGE 4 Mr. A71en stated the committee has realized that in order to make an accurate decision, they are going to need a professional to advise them on what a facility would cost. He stated the committee has asked him to approach the Parks &-Recreation Commission, who in turn can approach the City Council, to obtain funds to hire or acquire someone in this capacity. MD1'�ION BY MR, YOUNG, SECONDED BY MR. KON➢RICK, TO REQUE5T THAT THE CITY COUNCIL PROVIDE FINANCIAL A5SISTANCE TO THE CSTIZENS� ADYISORY GOMMITTEE TO DETERMINS A CAST ESTIMATE FOR.THE CON5TRUCTSON OF R BUZLDING AT THE COMMUNITY PARK.SITE. �� � � Mr. Bill Donahue stated he was the Chairman of the Gardena Committee, although he was at the meeting only as a citizen. He stated the committee had not seen any reason for knocking down Gardena Schoot or turning it into a condominium when they knew there were people ]ooking for a school. He stated he wondered why the Commission was not looking at Gardena School as a facility for recreation. Mr. Donahue stated he lives right behind Gardena. That school was closed for two years> and not one person or child was allowed to go in and make use of that facility. The schools are rot used all day Saturday or all day Sunday. A71 those gymnasiums are just sitting there. The pool at the Jr. High is open for an hour at a time for recreation. Mr. Donahue stated the Commission members pay taxes to the School Board. They have every right to speak up and get use of the schools and facilities, and how much effort has been done to do that? They are tatking about spending money for gymnasiums and a pool, and these facilities are already here, That pool does not belong to the School Board, but betongs to the ciiizens of Fridley. Ms. Nughes stated the Commission was not saying they were going to build a building on the park property. The whole reason for the Citizens' Advisory Committee is to see if there are any needs for a recreation building; and if there are, to tell the Commission what those needs are and how much it will cost to build it. They were also charged to look at what other facilities are in the area to serve these needs. They have talked to all the pool directors. The decision on whether or not to build wili not be made by this committee or the Parks & Recreation Commission, although the Comnission will make a recomnendation to the City Council. , Ms. kughes stated they have not been. up to see Gardena School, but members of the committee do live near by, She has been interested in other schools that have been closed in terms of alternate uses, and they do get together on a community education group which coordinates activities between the school and the Gity, aithough this was a difficult process. She stated she was in complete sympathy with Mr. Donahue. PARKS & REGREATdON COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 14, 1981 PAGE_ 5 Mr. Donahue stated the point he was tryinq to make was that he, personally, did not see a need for a recreational facility. Each school property would be a terrific place to build tennis courts, for example, rather than having tennis courts all in one place. Mr. Allen stated the elementary schools have been discussed by the committee. They have all four school districts represented on the committee. It was the feeling of most of the commiitee r�mbers that in the past, the eMphasis on recreation has 6een on the children, and they feel it is time to put emphasis on the adults. One thing brought up about the elementary schoo7s is that those facilities are designed for children and the s ze does not conform to adults. He stated he could assure Mr. Donahue that there are several people on the comnittee who share his feelings. Ms. Hughes stated Mr. Donahue's point was extremely well taken and is something that needs to be remerobered. UPaN A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRPERSON HUGHES DECLARED THE MQTION CARRIED UNANTMOUSLY. � Continued: loint Powers Rgreement - Anoka County Dr. Boudreau stated this is the third time this fias been on the agenda for some action by the Commission. According to Dave Torkildson, the County has been given the funds. The money is in the County's name in the bank from Metropolitan-Council for the purchase of Durham Island, the right-of-way easement behind Georget�wn Apartments, and for the State`s share of the monies to purchase the FMC property. On the fMC property, they need to await federal approval before they can go in and get appraisals, but they wi11 start with appraisals on Durham Island and the parcel behind Georgetown Apartments. According to the Master Plan, it has been a regionat park along the Mississippi River; and in the Master Platt, they do include Islands of Peace section the Hayes River Lots,Chase's Island, and Gil Hodges Island. Dr. Boudreau stated this joint powers agreement does not differ much from the one passed for Locke Park. This was first brought to the Comnission in November of 1979 under "Old Business", "County Develop- ment of the FMC Property". This was when the County brought in the Master Plan. At that time, it was mentioned the City would have an agreement with the County of some kind. Ne stated it behooves tt�e Commission to_give the City Council a negative, positive, or no direction on how to handle the joint powers agreement. Dr. Boudreau stated he has talked with Irene Maertens about this joint powers agreement. She is an immediate neighbor to the Islands of Peace Park on Rivers Edge Way. She has had an opportunity to look at the Joint Powers Agreement and the Master Plan. Her concerns were: PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSTON MEETING, JANUARY i4, 1981 PAGE 6 4. That the map shows that all of Chase's Island is owned by the City--not true. The County should be very accurate with maps sho�n in publicity and planning. Where is t�e bike firail going to leave Chase's Island--at the northern end by the chain link fence or at the school yard? How is the County going to handle the boundary problem at the northern end so there is a definite boundary between park and private? h�. Hughes stated that Dick Harris, Chairman of the Planning Commission, who also 7ives in that area, indicated he thought there ought to be a neighborhood meeting with the County people. He would tike to have Dave Torkiidson come out and explain this, and Mr. Harris is going to try to accomplish this. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. ALLls'N, TO RECO1�lMEND TO TXE CITY COIINCSL THAT THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BE ACCEPTED. � UPUN A VOICE YOTE, XONDRICK, ALLEN, RND YOUNG VOTING AYE,HUGHES ABSTAINING�� CHAIRPERSON HUGHES DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIEA � Ms. Hughes stated she did not like the County's involvement in the City's parks, and that is the reason she would not vote for it. NEW BUSINESS: R. Comnunity Education Coordination Committee Report Dr. Boudreau stated this was for the Comnission's information. He stated they received this document about a week before the Community Education Coordination Committee's last meeting on Thurs., Jan. 8th. Staffwise, they were quite shocked with the whole document. Dr. Boudreau stated they went into a cooperative agreement with Comnunity Education for its face value. Nowhere was it mentioned in this report that it was on a trial basis. As far as the City is concerned, it has been a very cooperative agreement. Community Education has put it fn writing that said the cooperative agreement was very good. Because of financial strains on their budget, all of a sudden, if this committee report is approved by the School Board, the City would no longer have a cooperative agreement which would tend to lead to competitive programming, and the Gity would lose its priority usage for the facility. Not only would they drop in priority, but they would be subject to a pro-rated fee schedule if it is determined they have enrollment fees that result in profit. Dr. Boudreau,stated they do not make a profit on any of the programs. Dr. Boudreau stated Staff was concerned with the contradictory state- ment made in Item �2 on page 1: "If no agency exists for meeting a particular community need, Community Education will seek to interest local residents in developing a system to service that need." PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 14 1981 PAGE 7 Dr. Boudreau stated they felt Staff is doing a good job in meeting a lot of the leisure time needs and could do much more program-wise, but they don't because they do have a cooperative agreement with Cortmunity Education. Dr. Boudreau stated the whole thing is being looked at and will be discussed. The City Council is aware of it and will be meeting with the School Board. Jack Kirk is going to meet with the Finance Corrmittee for Community Education. He staied he would try to keep the Cort�nission informed an this item. B. Parks & Recreation Canmission Meeting Site Mr. Young stated he thought it would be nice if the Commission could have their February meeting at the new nature center facility. They could have a tour of the building and get a better understanding of what•the building will be needing. MOTION BY MR. YOUNG, SfiCONDED B't MR. KONDRICK� TFiAT, IF PQSSIBLE, THE FEBRUARY 11� I98Z, PARXS & RECREATIDN COMMISSION MEETSNG BE HELD AT �THE SPRINGBROOX NATURE CSNTER BUILDI?7G RND THAT THE PROPER NOTICES BE GIVEN TO THE PUBLIC. UPON A VOICE VOTE', ALL VOTING AYfi, CHAIRPERSON HUGH&S DECLARED THE MOTTON CARRIED UNANSMOUSLY. . . ADJOURNMENT: Chairperson Hughes declared the January 14, 1981, Parks & Recreation Commission meeting adjourned at 9:16 p.m. Respectfully submitted, � � �a� Lyn Saba Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEY COMP9UNITY DEVELOPMENT� CONAIISSION MEETING ' JANUARY 13> 1481. GALL TO OROER: Chairperson Oquist called the January 73, 1981, Comnunity Development Comnission taeeting to order at 7:36 p.m. � . .: ROLL GALL: � Merqbers Present: LeRoy Oquist, Connie Modig, Kenneth Vos, Sharon Gustafson Members Absent: Al Gabel � Others Present: Bill Deblon, Associate Planner APPROVAL OF UECEMBER 9, 1980, COhA1UNITY DEUELOPMENT COMMIS5ION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. MODIG, SECONDED BY MS. GUSTAFSON, TO RPPROVE TXE DEC. 9, 1980, COMMUNZTY DEVEIAPMENT COMMISSZON MINUTES AS WRITTEN. � , '� � UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTINC AYE� CHAIRPSRSON OQUIST DECLARED TNE MOTION C1IRRIED UNANIMOUSLY. l: ISISCUSSION OF NEW ORDINANCE FOR CONDO CONUERSION LICENSE: At the December meeting, the Comnission made a motion recommending that Staff develop an ordinance on c�ndo conversion•licensing using the repealed Qrdinance #209, Housing Maintenance Ordinance #673, State Chapter #582 on Condominiums and Limited Partnership, and the recomtnendations made by the Cotr�nission. At this tneeting, Mr. Deblon gave the Comnission members a drafted ordinanca entitled, "An Ordinance Establishing Chapter 209 of Fridley City Code Entitled 'Conversion Condominium' Licensing". The Commission members reviewed the draft and made the following recort�nendations for changes on page 2; � 2�9,05 ApQlication No certificate of registration and application for conversion condominium ticense shall be approved unless the application contains the following information: 1. Description of ground area by street number and legal description. 2, Size of the building • 3. Number of stories and height in feet � � 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPt�EK7 COMMISSION MEETIN6, JANUARY 13, 1981 PAGE 2 4. Tatal floor area of the building 5. Fioor plan of proposed mod9fications 6. Number of dwe}ling units 7. Total area provided on prer,tises for off-street parking 8. A certificatiorr by the owner that the building is not in violatTOn of the provisions as set forth in Chapter 220 of the Fridley City Code. 9. The name and address of the ipdividual to whom any notice or order respecting the`pr�mises may be served or given during the conversion. 209.06 (Qld #Z under 2Q9.05) Condition of Approval No certificate or registration and application for a conversion condominium license shali be approved if there exists within the City a sigrrificant shortage of suitable rental dwel7ings availab7e to low and moderate income in�ividuals or families, or to establish or maintain the City's eligibility for any federal or state program providing direct or indirect financial �ssistance for housing to the city. Mr. Oquist stated he wondered if there should be some statement in the ordinance that refers to the state law, which would assure the City that the owner who is going to convert is aware of the state law and is in compliance. Mr. Deblon stated he agreetl with'the idea, but he would like to do some more research before deciding v;hether this reference should be put into the ordinance. Ms. Gustafson stated that under the new 2Q9.Ofi, the words, "significant shortage", "suitabie rentat dweltings", and "low and maderate income" were judgmentai words and should be deleted. Mr. Deblon staied this was iaken right out of state law. MOTZON BY �. VOS, SECONDfiD IIY MS. MODIG� TO DELETE TXE WORD "SUITABI�E"� BUT TO LEAVE THE REST QF 209.46 AS WRITTEN. �� � UPON A VOICE VOTE, OQUFST��VOS,�AND MODIG VOTING AYE��GUSTAFSON VOTING NAY, CHAIRPERSON O(JUIST DECLAREA THE MOTION CARRIEA . � . Ms. Gustafson stated she had voted against the motion on the grounds that it was not specific enough. _ The Commission members agreed that they would like the City Attorney to review the drafted condo convers#oii iicensing ordinance with the modifications made by the Corranission, and that the draft ardinance be brought back to the Commission at their Fetrruary meeting;, __ _ _ .t , Cflt4MtR4ITY DEVELOPMENT CQMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 13, 198T PAGE 3 Mr. Oquist stated that the wording in 209.06 Should 6e clarified by Mr. Herrick when he reviews the ordinance. 2. 07HER BUSINESS: A. Industrial Revenue Bonding Mr..Oquist stated that the City Council, through Planning Commission, has asked the Community Development Commission to establish a policy for industrial revenue bonding--some guide}ines that the City can go by before approving industrial revenue bonding. He stated that before the Commission can do that, they will need a better understanding of what industrial revenue bonds actually are. They need some kind of information from Staff in order to get a handle on it. Mr. Deblon stated the League of Minnesota Cities is studying the industrial revenue bonding issue, and they are going to be checking •with'other comnunities and will be putting so�nething down on paper. He stated he hoped to have some packet of information on industrial revenue bonding for the Comm9ssian for their next meeting. B. Discussion on the Purpose of the Communitv'Development Commission Mr. Oquist stated there was some discussion at the last Planning Comnission meeting on the purpose of this commission. Some discussion aas that the Community Oevelopment Commission is a lot like a mini- Planning Commission, and some of the things done by the Community DeYelopment Canmission do overlap with other commissions. The Planning Commission has requested that the Community Development Co�nnission discuss their role as a commission. Mr. Boardman had stated there was a definite need to redefine the goals of the Comnunity Development Commission.' Ms. Gustafson stated she felt the Co�ununity Development Co�mnission could play a useful role if they did establish some specific goals. They could look at block grants, for example. She felt the new Reagan administration will be big on housing block grants, and maybe as a comnission, they can be active in the disbursal and use of these funds. Mr. Oquist stated it was also suggested at the Planning Commission that maybe the Commission ought to narrow its purpose and be more specific as to what its purpose really is. The goats and objectives written 3-4 years ago are very global. Ms. Gustafson stated she did not know how much communication there is among the commissions as to what is actually going on with each commission. She thought the citizen corr�nissions could play an active role in what is going on in the city and contribute to it. She did not think the burden should lie on the Planning Department for resources. They as a commission can famiiiarize themselves with the programs available to the City and what the City has to do to meet criteria, the financing mechanisms, and have proposals for plans laid out. Her� main interest is in housing. �. .�,, COMMUNITY -0EVELOPMENT COMiP9ISSI�N MEETING3 JANUARY 13, ]98] PAGE 4 Ms. Modig stated tfiat when she became�a member of the Commissian, Mr. Boardman told them that he would like nothing better than for the Commission to imp�ement their own programs, goa]s, and pr�jects they felt were of interest and significant to the community. Basically, she thought that was vahy they were a commission. They are supposed to be representing the citizens. Mr. Oqaist stated he agreed, but he felt the Co�nission has to be very focal in the kinds of things they need to look at because there is a Human Resources Commission concerned about the human resources in tihe City, there fs an Environmental Quality Commission concerned about the environmental aspects of the City, etr. Maybe Staff should suggest the kinds of things that are avai7ab}e, and then maybe the Commission ought to recemmen¢ to City Councii the priorities of the,kinds of things they feel they should be doing, Dr. Vos stated they had discussed all pages•of minutes with the same words the last Planning'Gomnission meeting. spend time setting out new goals and done once. Maybe what they shouid da a3ready laid out and see if they are could see no reason for'goal-setting willing to work through their current this in.1978. There are seven that Mr. Boardman had stated at He could not see any reason to objectives when it was already is look at the goats that are sufficient or insufficient. He every few years, but he would be goals and objectives. Mr. Oquist requesxed Staff to send out a copy of the Commission's current goals and objectives to each of the Commission members. He asked each Commission �pember to be prepared to discuss these goals and objectives at their ttext meeting. He stated it was his personal opinion that the goa7s and objectives have to be changed and narrowed. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MS. GUSTRPSON, �SECONDED BY MS. A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIMG 1iY&, CHAIRPERSO COMMURITY DEVELOPMSNT COMMISSIOh MEETING Respectfully submitted, � C-`� yrin Saba Recording 5ecretary MODSG, TO.AA70URN THE MEETYNG. UPON N OQUIST DECLARED THE�JANUARY 13, 1981, ADJOURNED AT Z0:02 P.M. � �,� � �,�.- �-�;�. ,� . �` °-:�CT 'f� fi ` � #4�" '�. . $ , , ' � ��: < � � �;� � � .. �� �_ .. r �.. . . f . �<� � e�. � � � � , , F= ` � � � '_, : CITY DP FRIi'�.EY �� � � � � � �. , f.���iHl�t�TAL Qt�I.I'CY GOt�4I�S��t�N ` ME£'fI.}i6 - ? ; JA#UARY 20,'1981 � � �'_-�I�' . � � � � _ � � � - ,.'�: `�°sp[� $v�t�a a'alt��t t�aQ Janaary 2E1, i981, En�tir€►nmental� Quality Commission -, x-� �i°.td ak�Y at 7.�5 p.�n. � � � � � � � � t�} e k �. lfe�bers Pres�is�: Richard Svandas Jon Erickson, Lee Ann Sporre " �sra-A�;►�,_>, B�'c�eee Peterson. Daue €ngstran :.4��s Pr'�r>ent: Bi'47 tleblon, Assctcidte Rlanner. `�p�II� t1F DECfi�ffiER T6, 1980, ENVIRUNMENTAL QUALIT`C GOt�lISSION MINUTES: ;�yjYl',�V;,$}.'.1�u.,'S�RB� 5b'CC�VDSD 8Y M2. SRSCKSOIV� TO APPRtJVE TfIS DEC. 16� 1980, ��iTAL Sip�,FTY CIANMISSiON MINUTSS AS WR72'!!EN. ITPG�`A'_i�i&'g t+l�T�. '•�'+Z. .tr'f�S`HG ,A3'$. CFIASRP&RS4N SYAIiIaA DE�S�ARED 2'�$ dlqTlQ'� � �i'D .iTN1YN.�7JtTU5LY. .,��k�. �.i����:" . . � _ k" �QYPc$Y l�. EAtC,R'6Qi�r S,ECONDED BY %S. SPOR88� TQ' +�,�f'Jf%8' TBS A�NDA AS � .Sg�"1$'3t1, . . w ; UPZW(:11 °1?L1TC� �'E� ALL YQ2YNG J1YE� QLRSRP,$$SON SY.�DA DEGLARED SNE.1�T70N CJ�8R1iiD t�}�iiiTI7XlUSbY. 1, -,G#��It�D: fAitT�k DAY CLEPN-UP PR06RESS - I�r'.:,;��^frtkson s,�ated that prior tn the Go�mission's t�ec.: 1fi, 1980, meeting, i�,:�� ree�ivedrve call fr�m Kurt Scfirupp, the k'res;i�ent of the fridley �aycees, wt�a �as r�spcst�die�g to the letter from the Ca�rCkss�i�n on Earth Day C1ean-Up. -�?t�c. ;Sc�'upp,hat� asked what the C9i�nission had �� m�r�d and what the Cormiission's th�jgitts v�ere. He stated they would like to la�.-�(�one from the Commission _�$t�nd. tfie�r tt��iqg on #�ee. 17. � °M�.;�t*�cksOn statQd he had expla�ned the reason for.tfie letter and what the:�gi�s5or�'s thqughts were for this clea�-up. He had invited Mr. Schrupp ;:` t4.tlt� Caamiss9on's Dec. 16 meeting, and the Commis�ion would be gtad to ' s q��swe� �tny q�stions.- Apparently, no one was abt.e tfl came to the Camn9s5ion :� , � A�:�h�: = � �;, � �: iR`'� �. � �.. � - . . � . � � . . . =;� � . � � � _ .. - . - - . � . . . �. �� � � u � .. � � � ... .. � . . . . � . �. . €NVIRf3NMENTAL QUALITY CDM�IdSSIOt# M�ETING, ,�APitiARY 2�, ]981 PAGE 2 Mr. fr9ckson stated it was h3s �e9ing th�t.the. Jaycees were wiiling to lo�k '�nto it and help, twt certainT�r"did not desire to be the suppo�ting or sponsor- ittg organization. Mr. frfickson stated that;;'ott�er than the phone eatt from the Jayeees,' he h�d not received any ca7Ts frtno �ivic organizati�ns=regarding �art#► Day Ciean-wp. Ms. Sporre stated she had rece��ed a te7ephnne ca]1 from Joe Gargara, Presiden# of the fridley Lions Club „ Mr.;Gargara'had stated they wer'e very interested in being,invo7ved. Their;�oard had discussed it and they would �e wil7ing:ta supply, to some extent, �y a�d manpower fpr Earth Week. Th,ey ne+eded more inft�rma�fort and have askeid t�re �ottmissian tct supply a speaker to their next meeting,on Tuesday, �eb. �4. Mr. Erickson and Mr. Debl� bat.�t'stated they amuld plan to attend the Lions G9u6 meeting to'exptain t�e ptans for Earth�Day.` Tt� Cort�tissioners agreed �h�rv�utd wait until aft�r the meetirtg �vith the Lions C7ub before making-any furthet� ��cisions on the Earth �ay Glean-Up. 1�f7TI0N $Y 1kR. ERICXSt3N. 6EG'CB�iD$D.BY MS. SPORit&� TO COIYTINUS D�SC'USSSON ON EARPH L63Y CLEAN—UP. UPON A Vf7SCE VOT&, HLL IfEJ2'ZT�'s AYE'� CXAIRPE�N SVitPiDA D6CAERE�J '�E 1�2'SON CARRlBD UNANIMOUSLY.. 2. CON1'F#F�ED: CONSIDER#'I"iDN t3F' MEETIN& DATE GHANG€ Because the Commfssioners c4uid not corr� up with an alternate:ri�eetiag date that wau}d be conv�nient:for �11 �mbers, they decided to continue.meeting on tire �thir�f Tuesday of each`;m�snih. 3. CO�iINUE�: NQi2iH CRQSST4WN/TRUNK HIGNW�Y l0 Mr: fleb1un stated'there se�ms to be a tittie 7ag in the pracedure scf�edule for the North Crosstown/'Frunk Nighway 70. He woutd ]ike to apdaie the Gor�tission on the time ar develapment schedule. Mr. C�tzlan"stated;�here has been some concern on the part af Coon Rapids on the 7oss of intere�t for this crossing. Coon Rapids wants to see some.progress toward th€ifinat �velop�nt of tl�e crossi'ng, resolv�ng all envfranmental and economic issues. �{e sta�ed Coan Rapids scBeduled a meEting for Jan. 20 (that evening) o� �he Nai�thtown Task Porce consistfn of e'te�ted officials � 1 from a]l surr�ound#ng con�ni.ties to hear Gou�issioner9Riehard Braun provfide an update, The u#�imate decision on this project wiit be made 6y Coma�ssioner Brau�. � . _. _.._ .. '.�.. :: ,. � .. _,� s � . ;: ;�x -'� ;�;,"°S ,.# ",�.�'. �" : "aa" �.;; .. r ,. . 3 a M[CTt[11_`� iXMf'[�fA��F4 -��1 { .LY ..- . .. . ".3° '"n"F.. . . . . ...- # #e�# developmer�� scnedu}e is as foliows: fr;; : 2J�/S1 -~Draft E15 sent for pri»ting. NoLic� t�f -intertt is sent to EQ6, ; 3-5/81 - Ura#t fIS printed : �l�f�a - Draft 6IS is distributed �f'F/83 - Pub�ic hearing held I982 - Pr�dict f.ina] EIS �4f1�$3 �:F��at EIS approved- � 3/1/$6 - 6�#n construction d�'.Zfi�V BY:i�1R. ERI�SQffi, SF(NaNL1BD-BY MS. SPORkB� T4 (�1'I1VU8' DISCUSSION ON �3'R • GRQSSI'f3k�N✓TRUNIC AIGHWAY 20, UP�IV A 70FC$ V�'8�. REL VOT71l� �YB, CXAIRPSRSLW $YAN1� I�G'LARED 3'fLE 1�!lYlION , . C�,RRI$A 11n1J4N���,^I•i'. �-" �tr: �ar+d��'�sta#s� t�aG unkess new .�nformatinn is�-:pr�e�r�ted bQtwean now ar�d d�, it is not: necessary for this rtem to be p�t on tf�, agenda until tE�e :-,c�taaft EIS:is distributed: 1 #.;: GM3#i£R BtISiNESS• i�`3�i $Y''lY&. `�PQRRE� SECQWDSD BY MX. SRICKS(39V� R'fi �'G�`IVE INTO TSE REaORD �' �c�t r� zp�r�wrzorr. _ �7P'�l 1!;`�"!ZGffi 1fti8, �1LL irQTSHG AYB. CHAIRPE&SQAr SV�i�7i. DU#G'FJlRSD TAS iMOTI�' �1VA�t�1�#iS.Li�. ., _ . + * r » ;� ktr: Eri�ekson state� tl�at E+laartin Sabo in the ilashir►gtpn Report, Dec, 1980, � st�ted:#.kae�e was tegfsi�ti'on passed through thE tas� Legislative session ���1��d the Qu�et Ga�un#ties Act. This Act authririz��l the EPA: to develqp a p1� foC .eafcu�cta� the �rovisions of the Noise Cp�a�rt�1 Act of 1972, and the h#1!t proy3des assfstance to }oeaT comnunities in en�arcing local aeise control axe�nartces.: He-wan�ed to ktuwr if;5taff was aware o� tbis. Mk'•;D�bion st�ted Staff was aware of this, and;were anticipating some sort of g�s# in conjunct�on with,-the noise ord#nance program. � ,r . *_ ,� ,x 1Ar'- Deb%az stated t�e had talked to A7 P�rez re��rtt��+g the status of NPC-5. Appare�t�l,y, Terry Ho€f�natt, Executive Director �sf the M:P.C.A., has resigned °atld;taken a r►ew position, So, whaL�will.�app�n tp klPC�5 wi11 be up to the �te�t;,di�ector. . * * * * ��. :_ �. . . . EPt�FIR4NM€MTAt (�I�IiY Cf�I�SIQld. MEETING, JA�UAitY 24, i481 PAGE 4 Regarding the tetter dated f�ec,:�9, 1480, frc�nrthe.M.PrC.A, to:Orran Corp., Ms. Sporre stated that it �p�teared that the M.P.C.A. has go�ten some kind of` agreement with Onan;ta loak at the creosote prbbtem. She s#ated th9s was very ! good news, . 1 Mr. Ericksan stated it to�lc,s tike the M.P.C,A. is on top of the situation i and is working wfth°it. tte stated he feit there was nothing the Cc�mmission , could do a# this pct�nt. �#�ff has respanded to their eoncerns and the:City. ' has responded to �:Eteir cotSCerns;: The Commissio�'s major.responsibility at I th3s pqint is to just keep morti�ring i�. Mr. Svanda requested 5taf# to pUt this itero on the agenda whenever new infot�nation becomes avail�bte. *, * : * * . Mr: Debion stated ihere +�ti be=a meeting op Thurs., Jan. F9, 19$l, at Coon Rapids City Nall on "�osing Sewage Sludge D9spasal Sites." Metropolitan Councii witt hold'tt�ree iniormatianal meetirtgs �n iate January to fiear public ' reaction to the cri"�keria a�td s7udge tonr�age €stima#es. At)JUURNMENT: iif:1'ION BY MR. SRT�SON, &i4Cd�AIF3Sii 8Y MS. SPO�� TO AWOURN' TH8 a�ffi'STSNCz. UPON A YtlICB irQTfi. ALL ' P,fiTING AYB, CH1t:iRPER50N SG'ANDA DECZAREIT TXE ; JANUARY 20 � 1981, SNViRfH�1�ENTAL QUALi;'�'Y �'D1�1£iS8.�7�1.H6ETING AIhXOU&NfiD AT 9r01 P.19t. Respectfully s�bmitted, : .,. �/�'� �����" ynne a a Recordfng Secretary ' : ; . ., . � City of Fridley APPEFiT,S-COMMISSION�MEETING�-�JANUARY 27,�1981�- �- � -- PAGE 1 CALL TO ORDER: Vice Chairwoman Gabel called the Appeals Coicenission meeting of January 27, 1981 to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: t�mbers Present: Patricia Gabel, Dick Kemper, Alex Barna, Jim Plemel Members Absent: Virginia Schnabel Others Present: Darrell Clark, Chief Building Official APPROVE APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: JANUARY 13��1981: MOTION by t4r. Barna, seconded by Mr. Kemper, to approve the Appeals Commission minutes af January 13, 1981 as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, YSCE CHAIRWOMAN GABEL DECLARED Tf� I�TION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.�� . 1. 'PO CHAPTER 205 OF THE. SETBACK FOR OFF STREET PARKING FROM ' AND EiTHER REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK TO 5 FEET OF N.E. [Request by Dr. Jerome C. a Heights, MN 55421). 35 FEET TO SAME BEING 5 rstein, 1102 CITY CODE, TO 2Q FEET TQ UIRED 25 FEET 4 FEY�T, TO THROIIGH 30, NIVERSITY /2 Aver.ue N.E., DY. Jerome C. Schurstein, 1102 43-1/2 Avenue N.E., and his contractor; Jefferson "Jef " K. Holle, Construction, Inc., was present. MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Kemper, to open the public hearing. UPON A S70ICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE CHAIRWOMAN GABEL DECLARED TY.E PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:35 P.M. Vice Chainvoman Gabel read the Staff Report: ADMINIST[�TIVL•' STN.'P R]iYORT 5345 Univcrsity Avenue N.E, A. PUllLIC PURPUSL. SliRVED II'L Rt.'QU7Rlifth:NT: Section 20;.1.19, 1C� '-fl prohibits ofE-street �rking in any Portion o£ the requirod 20 foot- front yar.d. PuUlic purposc served by this requirement is to limit visual encroachment into �iei9hborin9 sight J.ines and to allaa for aesthetically ple�ZSing open areas adjacent lo public riyht oE ways. Section 205.113, 4A, N1, rqguires a front yard setback for the main buildinq of not le,s tl�an 35 feet. � AF�FEAI.S COMMISSION:MEETING - Januarv 27,.1981 Page 2 Yublic purpos� served by this requir.ement is to provide adequate cpen space areas around commercial strUCLure, f:or aesthetic and fire fighting purpones and to provide Aesired £ront yard spaca to be used for green areas and to add to the attractability of a conunercial zone. OR Section 205.113, 4C, 1E1, requires a rear. yard depth of not less than 25 feet. Public j�urpose served by this requirei2ent is to provide adequate open space around commeraial structures for aesthetic and fire fighting purposes. B. STAR'ED FL4RDSIiIP: Due to the odd st:ape of this property, and the single family residences behind this p.roperty, the building would have to be located closer to either the fzcnt or tl,e back 1ot linn chan would normally be required in order to get the appropriate amount of parking spaces for an office structure, C. ADMTNISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: The staff recar,mer.ds that the. Appea7.s Commisszon stipulate that the new building be placed no further west than the commercial structure to the south of this site. This would position the building approximately 15 feet off the front lot line at the northwest corner and give a 20 foot zear yard (both dimensions are scaled). Vice Chai.xwoman Gabel stated that this :iad been Seiore the Planni.ng Co�nission on 12/17/80 for rezoning. Mr.�Clark stated that there were several neighbors nt that nearing and it �ppeared tliat most of them wonld rather see it developed into an office Huilding rath�r than an apartment building. He said it would be better to encroach in the front yard, that it could be pushed forward 15 feet and line up with the building to the south of it. Vice Chaixwoman Gabel stated that she was at that public hearing and verified that the residents prefer an office bui2ding rather than an apartment building. Mr. Clark said there are three variances - parking lob, front yard and raar yard. He also said that part of the zoning reguirement (when you have commercial next to residential) is to have fencing that has to be 4 feet high. Dr. Scharstein said he has owned the land for 2-1/2 years and the building will have 9600 sq. feet (4800 sq. ft, each level) and there will be no barber shops or beauty parlors. He has two tentative insurance tenants. Vice Chaixwoman Gabel asked hpw soon he would start construction, Dr. Schurstein he had to get rezoning and the variances before he crould approach financing. Mr. Haner Melton, 5334 4th Street N.E., was present, and suggested that Dr. Schurstein's fence match the fence of the structure to tfie south, which is a 6 foot wood fence. He said they have a lot of problems with kids and theis motor dirt bikes in the alley and he came mostly to £ind out what is going to happen to the alley. Vice Chair- woman Gabel informed him that he and his neighbors could come before the City Council about the alley and that nothing will happen without notice of a public hearinq. Mr. Clark agreed that the Council would have to make a decision on the alley at a public hearing. Mr. Laurence M. Zi:mnerman, 5380-4th Street N.E., was present, and said he was iri favor of the office building but also expressed concern about the a11ey. Ms. Laura Vaqovich 5400 N.E. 4th Street, was also present, and expressed no objection to the office bu.ilding but was concerned about the alley. MOTION by Mr. Sarna, seconded by Mr. Plemel, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE CHAII&IOMAN GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT B:10 P.M. APPEALS COMh1ISSi0N MEETING - Januarv 27 1981 Page 3 MpTI4N by t9r. Barna� seconded by Mr. Kemper, that the Appeals Coimuission recommend to fhe City Conncil, thzough the Ylanning Commission, approval of the variance to reduce the setback for offstreet parking from the required 20 feet to 5 feet, and reduce the rear yard setback fram the xequired 25 feet to approximately 2Q €eet'and reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to approximately 15 feet, to be in line with the structuxe to the South, to allow the construction of a professional building of Lots 23 through 30, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanics- viile, the same being 5345 tiniversity Avenue N.E., with the stipulation ihat the rear lot fencing be of like material to the fence'to the south. UPON A VOICE VOT, ALL VOTING AYE, VICx CHAII�+lOMA43 GABHL DECLAItED THE MOTION CARRIED UNIbiOUSLY. 2.� REQUEST FOR VARIANCE PORSUN3T TO CHAPTER 205�OF TF� FRIDLEY CITY CODE�_TO PART OF IAT 4, AUDITOR'S SLIBDIVISION NO S9� � NTER1. THE SAME BETNG 6201 UNIVERSITY�AVENUE N,E. (Request by Stephen Brandgard, Affiliate Cedar Lake Road, Mi.nneapolis, MN 55416). Dr. David R. Steiner, 10532 Zion N.W., Coon Rapids, and Dr. Richard N. Ruerson, 327 Dean Avenue, Champlin, was present. MOTION by Mr. Plemel, seconded by Mr. Barna, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, VICE CHAIRWOMP,N GABEL DEGLARE�D THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:17 P.M. Vice Chairwoman Gabel noted that this was before the Planning Commission for . Special Use Permit on January 7th. Mr. Clark said approval was recox�nended with tum stipulations. Vice Chairwoman Gabel read the Staff Report: ADt-0IWIST72r1TIV� STAI•T RL'.PORT 6201 Uiiiversity Avenue L1.E. A, PUIILZC PURPOSL SERV1iD RY f2E;902R1iMI:PJT: Section 205.101, 3P, #1, requires an animal clinic to be of masonry constr�ction, outside wall thickness to be 8 inches, with a precast concrete roof. Public purpose'served by this requircment is.to protect the health, safety, and yeneral welfare of the residents of the City by eliminating the emission of possible odors and sound. B, STATED 11ARDSIiIP r "We are going to be renting one segment of an existing shopping center. ,We will be using this location only during the evenings and weekends for energency animal treatrnent." C. FtDMINISTRl�TIVE ST}ll•'1' RF•.VIEW: If this variance is recommended for approval, we reconunend that the Co�mnission stipulate that if sound and odors become a problem, that the Petitioner install a ventilaY.ion system and acoustical materials � that would eliminate all problems. _,'. �. APPEALS COMMISSION MEET7CIG - Januarv 27 1981 — Pa,�e 4 Dr. Steiner explained that the emergency would cover night calls for veterinarians i.n tfie area. It would He open 6 p.m. to 8 a.m. and on weekends with one vet and one technician on duty. Tt is in coopezation with_ a clinic started in St. Louis Park (noQ+ in Go2den Va11ey?. Mr. Kempez asked aUout thzt clinic's move from St. Louis Park and if there was a neighborhood problem that caused the lease to expire. Dr. Ruerson e�cplained that the lease was just short term and the clinic moved to larqer facilities and there were no neiqhborhood probl.ems. F{4� al�o said that dead amimals are placed in a cooler and are picked up by a cr.emaCOr :service. Vice Chairwoman Gabel asked if there would be any reason an anim3l woald be there longer than neceESary. Dr. Ruerson said, after emesgency treatment, if .he ani.mal needs further car�, it will go_to_another hospital. It was the duty Vet's responsibility to transpo�t the animal somewhere else. Dr. 5teiner seid once the animal has stabilized, it will 90 the pound if no one picks it up. Vice Chairwoman Gabe2 said if sound and odors become a problem, the staff has xecommended that they install a ventilation system and acoustical materials. Dr. Steiner said he saw no problem with that. Mr. Kemper asked abouc break-ins and Dr. Steiner felt there would be less of a problem with an emergency clinic. MOTION bp Mr. Plemel, seconded by Mr. Barna, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTTNG AYE� VICE CHAIRWOMAN GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HF,ARING . CTASED AT 8:37 P.M. , MOTION by Mr. Ksmper, seconded by Mr. Plemel, that the Appeals Commi.ssion xecon¢nend to the City Council, through the Planninq Commission, approval of the variance to allow a veterinary emergency clinic without the required precast concrete roof, to be located on part of Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No. 59, (T1oon Plaza Shoppi.ng Center), the same being 6201 TJniversity Avenue N.E., with the stipulations that, if sound and odors become a problem, the petitioner install a ventilation s�stem and acoustica2 materials that would eliminate all problems. UPUN A VOICE VOTF.', ALL VOTING AYE, VICE CHAIFiWOt�t3 G11BEL DFCLAREP, THE MOTION CARRIED UNAN'tP10USLY.I . ADJOURhfifENT: MOTIOL7 by Ns. Barna , seconded by Mr, Plemel, to adjourn. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE CHAIRPTOMAN GABEL DECi.ARED THE 11?PEALS COhIMISSZON MEETIIdC� OF JANQARY 27, 1981, ADJOURNEU�AT 8:40 P.M.�� � Respectfully snbmitted, �-� ti�,�.. Deb Niznik Recording Secretary S !� � f � CITY OF FRIDLEY i PLANMING COMMISSION MEETIN6, FEBRUARY 4, 1981 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Harris called the February 4, 1981, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:36 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Mr. Harris, Mr. Treuenfels, Ms. Schnabel, Mr. Svanda, Ms. Hughes (arrived 7:41 p.m.), Mr. Wharton Members Absent: Mr. Oquist Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner Louis J. Hamlin, Midwest Printing Company See attached list APPROVAL OF JANUARY 21, 1981, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTSON BY MS. SCHNABEL, SECONDED BY M12. TREUENFELS, SO APPROVE THE JAN. 2I, 5981, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICfi VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRI5 DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. . CONTINUED: PUBLIC HEARING: ZOA #80-06, BY W:G. DOTY AND GARY A. WELLNER: Rezone t e following describe parce s from M-1 light industrial areas to R-3 (general multiple family dwellings), that part of Blocks 8 and 9, Lowell Addition to Fridley Park, lying South of the North line of Sylvan Hills Plat 8, together with the Fasterly 1/2 of vacated Elm Street, and the part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 7, Lowell Addition to Fridley Park, lying Sautherly of the Westerly half of vacated Elm Street, located South of Mississippi Street, and East of Burlington Northern right-of-way. Public Hearing closed. MOTION BY MR. TREUENFELS, SECONDSD BY MR. WHARTON, TO RE'OPEN TXE PUBLIC HEARING ON ZOA �80-06 BY W. G. DOTY AND GARY A. WELLNER. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARfiD THE PUBLIC HEARING REOPENED AT 7:38 P.M. Mr. B oardman stated that Mr. Doty had contacted him and requested that the Planning Commission continue this item until the Feb. 25 meeting. Mr. Doty had stated he was getting a surveyor to find out exactly how much land he does have in order to put together some plans for the Planning Commission for R-2 property. Unfortunately, there was not enough time to notify the neighbors. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETIN6, FEBRUARY 4, 1981 PAGE 2 Mr. Boardman stated that in view of the number of people in the audience and the presence of a petition, the petition and any further testimony from the people should be presented to the Planning Cor�nission. (Ms. Hughes arrived at the meeting at 7:41 p.m.) Mr. Michael Larson, 6390 Starlite Blvd., read the petition opposing the rezoning from M-1 to either R-2 or R-3. He stated the names on the petition were just a small sampling of the neighborhood. Many more people support these views and they will be at the next Planning Commission meeting if needed. MOTIDN BY MR. WHARPON� SECONDED BY MS. SCHNABSL, TO RECEIVE THE PETITION REQUEST- ING THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO REJECT THE CONSIDERATION OF REZONING THIS PROPERTY FROM M-1 TO EITHER R-2 OR a-3. (Petition �-�9g�� UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYS� CHAIRMAN XARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Harris stated the petition was received and would accompany the Planning Commission's minutes to the City Council on this item. Ms. Judy Kidder, 6360 Starlite Blvd., stated they had spent the past week getting organized and contacting other neighbors. They had made arrangements to come to this meeting, and many of them had babysitters. She asked if the Planning Commission could make a decision on this rezoning request that evening as none of them had been notified of the request for continuation by the petitioners. She did not think it was fair if this was continued. Mr. Harris stated the decision to continue or move on this item was up to the Planning Commission. He stated he was rather upset that Mr. Doty has asked for a continuation at such a late date. Mr. Harrisstated he thought the Commission had made it plain to Mr. Doty and everyone else concerned that he was expected back at this meeting with his proposal. Mr. Rice, 100 Sylvan Lane, stated that back in 1965, they had a problem with a low spot in the Sylvan Hills area, but there were no complaints about flooded basements or sewer problems. After Satellite East and West was built, all of a sudden the City Engineering Dept. was flooded with complaints of flooded base- ments and backed-up sewers. A new pumping station had to be built and water mains enlarged. This cost the Sylvan Hi11s neighbors quite a bit of money. He stated that, if additional units were built, would the present pumping station be big enough to handle the extra sewage? Mr. Boardman stated the City Engineering Dept. had looked at this and did not see any problems. Mr. Rice stated that he was told that Mr. Doty wanted a blanket permit to put in whatever he wanted. What isto stop Mr. Doty from putting in 68 units instead of 34? PIANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 4, 1981 PAGE 3 Mr. Boardman stated that 34 units is the maximum density Mr. Doty can put in on that property with that zoning. Ms. Carolyn Johnson, 6336 Starlite Blvd., stated that Mr. Doty and Mr. Wellner had indicated they were concerned about their financial losses. She stated that before they purchased theland, they should have made the agreement to purchase the land only after it was rezoned to their liking--not to purchase the land first and then decide they want it rezoned. Mr. Longerbone, 180 Sylvan Lane, stated there are very few double 6ungaloes in the City of Fridley that are decent, and why should their neighborhood be ruined because Mr. Doty wants to put in double bungaloes? Ms. Carolyn Johnson stated that Mr. Doty has commented on how beaufifu] his duplexes are on 5th Street. She stated they are not beautiful, they look terrible and are not kept up at all. She wished he was in the audience to hear that. Mr. Larson stated one of the big issues brought up at the last Planning Commission meeting was the opinion that it was not financially feasible to develop this property into single family homes. He stated he was convinced it was feasibte. He thought the real point Mr. Doty was trying to make was the maximum profit would be realized by rezoning the property to R-2. He stated their whole purpose for being at the Planning Correnission in greater numbers this evening (and would be in even greater numbers at any future meeting) was they feel any incremental profit that might be realized 6y developing this property into double bungaloes is going to be directly offset by their individual homes. They feel they have enough multiple family housing and feel it would be a rea7 burden. They would appreciate it if this request was rejected ai this time. Mr. Frank Liebl, 222 Mercury Dr., stated he lives a block and a half away from this property. He stated he could see both sides of the issue. He would like to point out that they already have quite a few multiple housing units in R-3 which have created traffic problems. If more R-2 or R-3 are put in, it would just multiply the problem from a traffic standpoint. He stated Mr. Doty and Mr. Wellner have the right to develop their property, but even an additional 74 units are going to increase their traffic problem. If this property is rezoned R-2 or R-3, he felt it would be detrimental to their neighborhood and would compound the problem they are facing right now. Ms. Jan Christenson, 6260 Starlite Blvd., stated that last sumner her husband was granted a special use permit to build a garage with the intention of buildiny a new home. Right now, as their plans stand, the house wi17 cost around $130,000. Now they wonder if they should put that house there if these units are to be built. What will be the value of that home two years from now if those units are built? Ms. Donna Messer, 114 Satellite Lane, stated she lives in the second house from the end on Satellite Lane. She stated she watches the cars use this street as a drag strip. A couple of children always play on the blind corner, and they just happened to not be playing there one day when a truck drove up into the neighbor's yard. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 4, 1981 PAGE 4 Ms. Gail Ahrens, 198 Mercury Dr., stated they have suffered around $500-600 worth of damage from cars that come across their lawn and hit trees. She stated they are fortunate that the Satellite Apartments are kept up as well as they are. but this may not always be the case. She stated the apartment owners should be comnended for the good up-keep of those apartrr�nts. She stated if duplexes are added, the whole neighborhood could go down the drain financia)ly within a couple of years. Mr. Liebl stated they are not opposed to Mr. Doty doing something with his property, but they have to look at what kind of impact this proposal will have on this neighborhood. Mr. Larson stated that Mr. Doty could come in with plans for the Taj Mahal, and 9f it is in an R-2 or R-3 zone, they wou7d be very much against it. He stated that in the best interests of the Planning Comnission's time and their time, they would appreciate ii if the Planning Cormnission would make a decision on this proposal that evening. MOTSON BY MR. WHARTON, SECONDED BY MS. SCHNABEL� TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ZOA $80-06 BY W. G. DOTY AND GARY A. W&'LLNfiR. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHRIRMAN HARRIS DECLARE'D THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:08 P.M. Ms. Schnabel stated that last time when they heard this proposal, she seconded and supported a motion to deny this request. She stated she did not have any reason to change her mind; however, she was a little uncomfortable denying it again in Mr. Doty's and Mr. Wellner's absence. She stated the petitioners have paid $125 for the rezoning request and $125 for the vacation request, and she felt uncomfortable denying them their "day in court". She stated she knows the residents' feelings and she supports those feelings. Mr. Wharton stated he felt that if the petitioners were that interested in their $250, they would have been at the meeting. Mr. Svanda stated he agreed with that and did not have any sympathy for the fact that the petitioners were not at the meeting. Mr. Harris stated he als4 agreed. Mr. Treuenfels stated he did not see any reason to continue this item. Ms. Hughes stated she also did not have any sympathy in terms of the money. Mr. Doty came before the Planning Comnission unprepared and prematurely, but she did think they owed him a hearing. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 4, 1981 PAGE 5 MOTION BY MS. SCHNABEL, SECONDED BY MR. WHARTON, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL DfiN2AL OF REZONING REQUEST ZOA��80-06 BY W. G. DOTY AND GARY A. WELLNER: . REZONE THE FOLZAWING DESCRIBSD PARCELS FROM M-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AREASJ TO R-3 (GENSRAL MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLINGS), THAT PARS OF BLOCKS 8 AND 9, LOWELL ADDITION TO FRIDLEY PARK, LYING SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SYLVAN HILIS PLAT 8, TOCETHER WITH THE EASTERLY 1/2 OF VACATED ELM STREET, AND THE PART�OF LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 7� LOWELL ADDITION TO FRIDLEY PARK, LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE WESTERLY HALF OF VACRTED ELM STREET, 7ACATED SOUTH OF MISSISSIPPI STREEP, AND EAST OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN�RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE REASONS FOR DENIAL ARE: 1. THE OVERWHELMING FEHLINGS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AS DEMONSTRATED BY THS NUMBERS OF PEOPLE AT BOTH PUBLIC HEARINGS AND BY THE PETITION THAT WAS SIGNED BY THE NEIGHBORS; AND 2. THAT MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL ON TXAT�PARTICULAR PIECE OF PROPERTY IS NOT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE NEIGHBORH00D WITH REGARD TO� BASICALLY� TRAFFIC AND THE FACT THRT THE NEIGHBORHOOD ALR&'ADY HAS A RATHER HIGH IMPACT OF MULTIPLE DWELLINGS IN IT. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRh1AN XARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Harris stated that ZOA #80-06 was recommended to City Council for denial. Mr. Boardman stated this wil7 be set up for a public hearing at City Council on Mar. 9, 1981. 2. CONTINUED: VACATION REQUEST, SAV #80-14, BY W. G. DOTY AND GARY A. WELLNER: Vacate that part of Minnesota Street, as ai out in LoweT`I—Addition to Fridley Park; or Mercury Drive, as laid out in Sylvan Hills Plat 3, now known as Satellite Lane, ]ying West of the Northerly extension of the West line of Starlite Blvd., also being the East line of Lot 1, Block 4, Sylvan Hills Plat 3. Mr. Harris stated this was not a public hearing, but they would conduct it as an informal public hearing. Mr. Boardman stated at the end of Satellite Lane, the City has some street right-of-way. The eventual plan at one time was that Satellite Lane would cross the railroad tracks. He stated this is not going to happen. The petitioner has requested vacation primarily because of additional land for development. At this time, the City has no problem with the vacation. The City is not using the street right-of-way and will not be using it. Mr. Michael Larson, 6390 Satellite Lane, stated ha is really the only one affected by this vacation as his lot line adjoins the easement. He has mixed feelings about it, but he will not oppose the vacation in the hope that he will see this property deve7oped R-1. If there was any chance it would be developed R-2 or R-3, he would speak against the vacation. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 4, 1981 PAGE 6 Mr. Boardman stated he wanted everyone to understand that he cannot keep the petitioner from developing industrial if he so chooses as this property is presently zoned M-1, light industrial. MOTION BY MS. HUGHES, SECONDfiD BY MR. TRSUENFEIS� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF VACRTION REQUEST SAV #80-I4 BY W. G. DOTY AND GARY A. WELLNER 7Y1 VACATE THAT PART OF MINNESOTA STREET, AS LAID OUT IN LOWELL ADDITION TO FRIDLEY PARKj OR MERCURY DRIVE, AS LAID OUT IN SYLVAN HILLS PLAT 3� NOW KNOWN AS SATfiLLITE LANS, LYING WEST OF THE NORTHERLY EXTfiNSION OF THE WEST LINE OF STAR- LITfi BLVD.� ALSO BEING THE ERST LINE OF LOT I� BLOCK 4, SYLVRN HTLIS PLAT 3. UPON A VOICfi VOTE, RLL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THS MOTION CARRZED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Harris stated that SAV #80-14 is recommended to City Councit for approval and will go before City Council on Feb. 23. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #80-13, BY AALi E J�. ILC : Per Section 205.051, ,� oTl w an existing accessory ui ing 4 ft. x 20 ft. to be moved to the rear of the property and be used for a storage shed, and a new detached garage, 24 ft. x 30 ft. to be constructed on Lot 8, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 21, the same being 945 Mississippi Street N.E. MOTION BY MR. TREUENFELS� SECONDED BY Aff2. SVANDA� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SP #80-13 BY WALTER J. MILLER. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:32 P.M. Mr. Boardman stated that Mr. Miller was not in the audience. He stated Mr. Miller intends to move the existing shed to the rear of the lot and build a new garage off the existing blacktop area. Staff has no problem with this request, and he has not received any objectian from the neighborhood. ' Mr. Harris stated this was a rather large accessory building, and he would feel rather uncomfortable approving it without talking to the petitioner. MOTION BY MS. SCHNABEL� SECONDED BY FiS. HUGHES, TO CONTINUE SP #80-13 UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING AND REQUEST STAFF TO CONTACT FII2. MILLER AND.ASK THAT HE BE AT THE FEBRUARY 25 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. Mr. Treuenfels stated he had some problems with delaying a request for a 24 ft. x 30 ft. garage. UPON A VOICE VOTE� HARRIS� SCXNABEL� AND HUGHES VOTING RYE� TREUENFELS� SVRIV�DA, AND WHARTON VOTING NAY, QiAIRMAN HRRRIS DECLARED THE MOTION FAILED BECAUSE OF A TIE VOTE. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 4, 1981 PAGE 7 MOTION BY MR. SVRNDA, SECONDED BY MR. TREUTi'NFELS� TO RECOMME'ND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF SPECIAL U5E PERMIT,SP #80-13 BY WALTER J. MILLER, WITH THE PROVISION THAT.TXIS GARAGE BE USED AS A GARAGE FOR PARKING AND STORAGE AND NOT BE USED FOR A REPAIR SHOP OR ANY BUSINESS-FOR-PROFIT ENTERPRISE. Ms. Schnabet stated she could understand Mr. Svanda's feelings. Her perspective came from being on the Appeals Commission where they hsar these kinds of requests all the time. As a regular practice, the Appeals Commission has always requested that the petitioner appear before them. They feel it is not good policy to routinely approve things because a person fills out an application, pays his fee, etc. By having the opportunity to sQeak to the petitioner, it brings out a lot of information that is not contained in the 8 lines of print on paper. Even though, on face value, it appears to be a very straightforward and simple request, they have often found many under1ying reasons and circum- stances. One important thing requested by the Appeals Commission which must be included in the hearing is the hardship of the petitioner--why the petitioner needs what he is requesting. She stated that in this case, there is no hardship shown. Why does the petitioner need this building and why should the Zoning Code be circumvented or altered to permit the construction of this building? For these reasons, she stated she could not support the motion to approve the special use permit. Mr. Harris stated he concurred with Ms. Schnabel. UPON A VOICE VOTE� SVANDA, TREUENFELS, AND WHARTON VOTING AYE,�XARRIS, SCRNABEL, AND HUGHES VOTING NAY, CXAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED TH& MOTION FAILED BECRUSE OF A TIE VOTE. MOTION BY MS. HUGHES� 5ECONDED BY MS. SCHNABEL� TO CONTINUE SP N80-13 BY WALTER J. MILLER UNTIL THE FEB. 25 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. UPON A POICE VOTE� HUGHES� SCHNABEL� HRRRIS� AND SVANDA VOTING AYS� TREUENFELS RND WHARTON VOTING NAY, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED 4-2. Ms. Schnabel stated she felt the Planning Cprrmission should be cautious about these kinds of things. She did not think it was in the City's best interest to act on things when they do not have the opportunity to speak to the petitioner. Mr. Harris requested Staff to ask the petitioner to be at the next meeting. 4. replat of 61ock 11, Gre some unplatted 7and. ( description) to allow th Company, the same being OF A PROPOSED PRELIMI U1J J. FiHI`1L11V� �1�91UWtJl YK11VI1Nli I.UMI'HIVY: CQ111C] d at Nort ern In ustria enter, ri ey, along with See Public Hearing notice for complete legal e construction of a new building for Webb Printing 5101 Industrial Blvd. N.E.z MOTION BY MS. SCHNABEL, SECONDED BY .�2. SVANDA, TO WAIVE THE R&'ADING OF THE LENGTHY LEGRL DESCRIPTION. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRNAN HARRIS DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 4, 1981 PAGE 8 MOTION BY MR. SVANDA, SECONDED BY MR. WHARTON, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON P.S. �82-01 BY LOUIS J. HAMLIN, MIDWEST PRINTING COMPANY. UPON A�VOICE VOT&� RLL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:52 P.M. Mr. Boardman stated that instead of replatting Block 11, Industrial tenter, tbey decided to go with a new plat with the portion in the Planning Commission agenda. It made it a lot simpler to set up a new addition, calling it Midwest Addition, Block 1, Lot 1. This is included in the lega7 description so they did not have to readvertise the legal description. He stated this property is presently owned by Midwest Printing Company, but they cannot close on the property until this is straightened out. Mr. Hamlin is in the audience to answer any questions. City Staff has no problems with this request. MOTION BY MR. WHARTON� SECONDED BY h4Z. TREUENFELS� TO CLOSE THE PUELIC HEARING ON P.S. #8I-01 BY LOUIS J. HAMLIN� MIDWEST PRINTING CO. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN HRRRI5 DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 9:03 P.M. MOTION BY MS. HUGHES� SBCONDED BY MR. TREUENFEZS, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVRL OF A PROPOSED PRELIMINRRY PLAT, P.S. N82-01, MIDWEST ADDITION, BY LOUIS J. HRMLIN, MIDWEST PRINZ7NG CO.�ANY: BEING R REPLAT OF BLOCK ZI, GRERT NORTHfiRN INDUSTRIAL CENTER, FRIDLEY, ALONC'i WITH SOME UNPLATTED LAND. (SEE PUBLIC HfiARING NOTICE FOR COMPLETfi LEGAL DfiSCR2PTION) TO AL7AW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW BUILDING FOR WEBB PRINTING COMPANY, THE SAME BEING SIOZ INDU5TRIAL BLVD. N.E'. UPON A VOICE VOTfi� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Harris stated a public hearing would be set at the City Council meeting on March 9, 1981. He thanked Mr. Hamlin for his time and patience. 5. CONTINUED: CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSED NOISE ORDINANCE Mr. Boardman stated this would be set up for a public hearing at the Feb. 25th Planning Corr�nission meeting. Ms. Kathy Callahan will also be at that meeting to discuss the noise ordinance. MQTION BY MR. WHARTON, SECONDED BY MS. HUGHES� TO CONTINUE CONSIDfiRATION OF A PROPOSED NOISE ORDINANCE UNTIL THE FEB. 25�MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOU5LY, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 4, 1981 PAGE 9 6. CONTINUED: PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENT TQ CHAPTER 2Q5 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY Mr. Wharton stated the Energy Commission has been reviewing the Zoning Code and has received some recormnendations from Staff for the Energy Commission's consideration. Ne would not like to see this document concluded until the Energy Comnission has passed on their recommendations and comments to the Planning Commission. Mr. Boardman stated he would like to get all the Planning Corronission's considera- tions done, so that when they get the Energy Co�renission's concerns, they can deal only with those concerns. The Corrrnission began reviewing the Zoning Code on page 74, C-3 District Regulations. Mr. Boardman stated that wherever it is stated "on file in the office of the City Engineer", it should be changed to "on file in the office of the �Cit�" Also, wherever it is stated "by the Zoning Administrator", it should be changed to "by the _Ci��t " Mr. Boardman stated that under "Drainage and Grade Require- ments," �4-�, "not to exceed four (4) feet" should be deleted. Page 83 205.16 CR-1 DISTRICT REGULATIONS 205.161 Uses Permitted Delete D(Recreational facilities such as swimming pools and skating rinks, which are available to the public) under #2, Accessory Uses. Page 99 M-1 District Regulations should be changed to "M District Regulations" 205.181 Uses Permitted #2-A should be "Offices" The Commission ended their review on page 106. MOTION BY MR. TREUENFELS, SECONDED BY MS. 5CHNAB&L� TO CONT2NUE THE PIIBLIC HSARING ON THE�AMENDMENT TD CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING RYE, CXAIRMAN HRRRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � Mr. Harris declared a ten-minute recess at 10:10 p.m. (Mr. Wharton left the meeting at 10:10 p.m.) PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 4, 1981 PAGE 10 7. RECEIVE JANUARY 14, 1981, PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: M02'ION BY MS. HUCHSS, SECONDED BY MS. SCHNABEL, TO RECEIVE THE JAN. I4� Z981, PARKS.& RfiCREAT20N COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICfi VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Hughes stated that on page 4, the Parks & Recreation Commission had made a motion and they were asking for the Planning �ommission's concurrence on that motion requesting financial assistance from the City Counci7 to the Citizens' Advisory Committee to determine a cost estimate for the construction of a building at the Comnunity Park Site. She stated there was some thought the assistance could be provided on the staff level, in which case an architect would not have to be hired. MOTION BY MS. HUGHES TO CONCUR WITH THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION IN REQUESTING THE CITY COUNCIL TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO THE CITIZENS. ADVISORY COI�AlITTEE TO DETERMINS A COST ESTIMATE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A BUILDING AT THE COMMUNITY PARK SITE. THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. 8. RECEIVE JANUARY 15, 1981, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: MQTIQN BY MR. TREUENFELS, SECONI�D BY MS. SCHNABfiL� TO RECEIV& THE JAN. 15, 1982, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLRRED THE MOTION CARkIED UNANIMOUSLY. 9. RECEIVE JANUARY 13, 7981, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. HUGHES, SECONDED BY MR. TREUENFELS� TO RECEIVE THE JAN. 13, 1981, COMMUNITY DfiVELOPFI6NT COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOIC& VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLRRED THE MOTION CARkIED UNANIMOUSLY. 10. RECEIVE JANUARY 20, 1981, ENUIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMI55ION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. SVANDA, SECONDfiD BY MR. TREUENFEL5� TO RECEIVE THE JAN. 20� 1982, ENVIROIVMENTRL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AY$, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARI2IED UNANIMOUSLY. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 4, 1981 PAGE 11 11. RECEIVE JANUARY 27, 1981, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTZON BY MS. SCHN.ABEL,� SECONDSD BY MR. TREUENFELS, TO RECEIVE THE JAN. 27, 2981, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTS5. � UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMFLN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 12. OTHER BUSINESS: Ms. Schnabel stated she had been reviewing old Planning Commission minutes. In the June 9, 1980, Special Planning Commission meeting minutes, one of the questions the Planning Commission had discussed was when should there be public hearings for public improvements. The Planning Coranission did not come up with any special definitive answers, but they had requested Staff to write a letter to the Charter Comnission asking them to review this. She thought it was important that the Planning Commission follow up on this as she did not know if a letter was written or if the Charter Comnission had done anything about it. She would like Staff to send a follow-up letter to the Charter Commission and report back to the Planning Corranission. * � * * * * Mr. Harris stated he had talked to the City Council at their Jan. 26 conference meeting about the Housing Section. The City Council apparently does not share the Planning Cortunission's concern about providing the opportunity for affordable housing in the City of Fridley. They seem to feel they have made a covenant with the City to maintain 9,000 sq. ft. lots and maintain the level of affluence they now enjay. He stated he isi�r promoting reasonable and affordable housing in the City of Fridley. Mr. Treuenfels stated he agreed that housing is one of the concerns he also has for the City of Fridley. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. TREUENFEIS, SECONDED BY MS. SCHNABEL, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICh' VOTE� ALL VOTING AYfi, CHAIRMRN HARRIS DECLARED THE FEB. 4� 198Z� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 12:25 P.M. Respectfully submitted, � Lyn Saba Recording Secretary � PLANNPNG COMMISSION MEETING, FfBRUARY 4, 1981 NAME Michael Larson Jerald P. Severt Linda J. Severt Donna Messer Marijane Tessman Judy Kidder Bill Kidder Bab Strom Bill Zurbey Catherine Schenuen Paul Schenuen Mary Hartfiel Jan Christenson Katherine J. Fischer Caroline Johnson Tom Hartfiel Howard Lourien Elaine R. Shupien Merle Longerbone Frank Liebl E. L. Rice Gail Ahrens ADDRESS 6390 Starlite Blvd. 100 Satellite Lane 100 Satellite Lane 114 Satellite lane 6390 Starlite Blvd. 6360 Starlite Blvd. 6360 Starlite Blvd. 144 Satellite Lane 145 Sylvan Lane N.E. 131 Sylvan Lane 131 Sylvan Lane 120 Sylvan Lane 6260 Starlite Blvd. 6312 Starlite Blvd. 6336 Starlite Blvd. 120 Sylvan Lane 160 Satellite Lane 6299 7rinity Dr. 180 Sylvan Lane 222 Mercury Dr. 100 Sylvan Lane 198 Mercury Dr. �� � . _ �.�.�..�.�.� ��9 � _ �� � .���-'� �� �1�/�c%. ��9a��-�-G=� -� � �oo � � � �� i� - y y� ,������- �. �� %'Yfa�,�a,��e.�e�a�ne� 1v39o���� ���`�C - � y�/-.�ac�� l0 3 6 0,�-� �_ l�-QP �`� b 3 6 a �*-�- �,r.t ��-e� �,�. ' y�f s��?�AA�e .�-n, � � �,.�.-�- � �-�"� � �s S �.e.-� �`•�- . �k�9��2 l "3/ � � �������`.�-'" /.�/ � . � �L ` . /� o -! •----�- �7 . /�'� _ ,� �-- 4�� �o o� �p � ��-;.r.- � • �ia�, (0 3 t`dl �-�ti '�. _ 8��. , �� o_ �33l�_ ����. �-3��. � _ ,20 __�..�. �,� � /�!!l � Lov,Ci��✓ l G a S"��� �� � L �,��i►N...�- `_ �.r'��°� � _ _ �'� . c���� r���� �%� __ ___ _/�0�3���-�-,.�.. � , �� � � �:� � HUMAN RE50URGES COMM255IOR MEETING, JANURAY T5 1981 PAGE 2 is. then the respisnsibi'lity of the pub9ie govern�:nt, not only from •the municipal level, but also from the state and federal level? It becomes their`problem. 2. What is the responsibi°Tity to the City`as a whole as a home,-not only to the resid�nts of the City, but what'can the City do to attract tourism attractions or other-Visitors to the urban center?• It is of economic value'to the City o` Minneapolis to have those vis:itors. It is also of economic value to hold residents, io hold :the poputation, because of the services they receive from the City. 3.. What is the responsi�77ity of public government to the individual practicing artist? T�18t'2 ]S quite a bit of controversy in this area. Gover�nment shows very little regard f�r any specific profession. Most people have a very:romantic vfew af the artist. They think of an ar.tist as one wt�o wears a 6eret, fias a patette with a brush; and lives in a garret. There is a creative worker within our society, artd ihose ct'eatiue workers are involved in many aspects that reach people in different ways. If a11 those engaged in creative employ- ment such as graphic arts, drawing, mal�ing images, performers, m4sicians, �riters, etc., were to go on strike, there would be no products on Lhe ma�ke�, For the most part, tfie>artist is disregarded as a worker so-the3� feet the respons9biaa ty from ihe.point of view of the city, especia'fly'Minneapotis, who depends very much on the arts. The arts is a very'ir�4rtant industry to �tinneapolis, so they are concerned about the civic responsibility to a certain broad industry. Ms; Eharles stated her cvrron#ssi�n is thought of by other comnissions in other cities as being rather avant-garde. ' Minneapolis has a lot more tir� and space to really deal with prflblems as they emerge. As a director of an agency, she finds she can respond to that siyle. SHe can take her time,:think, and do long range.planning, As an agency, they are respopsible for delivering to the City Cauncil programs that fortify what ts inherent in their responsibility. Ms. Charles stated most people think of the arts as a"frili". This pretty rr�ich comes from a history in the United States of.an unwillingness to fund or allow tax dollars to� toward things that do not directly re]ate to the ability to earn.an income, thought they were now begimting to realize that their culture and ability to appraach the humanities is absoiutely crucial for their future. Also, as a city artd as a country, havfng a great mixture of people, races, and nationalities, they should regard the;sultures of others very highly and a11ow for transia�ian of those culture into vur culture and also aT�ow that dialogue to pernieate beyond that so an American culture begins'to exist out ofi it. She statee! this is just beginning to happen. Ms: Charles stated th� reason for a commission at this time is becoming important throughout the coqntry.; A commission is very different from an arts councit. A conanissiort is ger�erally an official politica7 body attached"to � yx ' �17e �- . ,1; =fi1� , :z� �.: � s aq ager aad the rooney th't � � `�ha� � �e Dttite� �� is of; , �7iNG-�---'-- �.� �ttnci l i s a p� has erea est to'ma �-.t,�;- � `i��titutions in tfie creat�d,by Very wealt pretty mricM es t.�e di �n as pubt # c mor�ey <e �rd to pay t#�e bills, that time was to corp t�: the tota� ���omrtwn�t3�.;�-` sibility. fiaw institutian+ tMer respurces`with�ia �e e, and hoat they are deali� a►as a mi Meen it is im� W�t. way a ]oCa1 [p #o make tF ;, ���F �, - , : .. Lv measre, worresttaps, rned abaut whether or i orgarrization. The cit� uch �s:schools and i�bi tr�►�{j#�g for arts wi#fi' R f�� PA6E .3 � - on that ofte� receives �at publac bafly to y state has a state a Nationat Endocwnent. of the arts end �le in �ny different ae af public art �nd'public te sector and the public �:, with the exception of �t<was a playtiring, and r�l. This who]e s�#uation picture. When families �ase had to grow. The :o the public sector. With :ntity can make once iax �e that tfiase institutions one has ta be aw�re crf ig the schools, how they wbat kind of edu�atior�a7 r collections. � Et any. money into its � �se institutions are stifii '� � � � the convenienc.e ot�_ �k+s -� �� � governmer�i'dec�de� firt �ograms get wri tt�:n th�t . :� can �fund arr �ns�i��t�s►n ilable so that t.�e .: c, She thought � city �ta�ion is avai3a�ie to o be very concerned at�ut ke sure schools �re . 1. The importance of ` e�s.the very�lraslsaf art issetr, �rte iact that a chi�,d h,as ,� and use creativity ahd 9maginatton. Tnnovative progr�ms or � ppening st� ar�s camatissiot�s�aisd trrts councils ean, in a sense, s, And, it is up to the citi�ens at:;certain points t4 rem9nd Vecied nffic�sl� that t.�+s,��, havg .to t�� concerrye� x��th �re �d sewers. 9 that in regar�# to tk►e ;,�;� the c't 't��) ^tant:° It do�sn't r�an �'�is`��t�i�aortantyto at it is it�art�nt to Ci:ties a��+� kTinneapatis, �ge that can take place betweerJ ei�ies that can fi, the t tiet s� BC��f� _-. Pt� �=-; ,,.,_. - , , >.. . ..� . HUM�kN RESOURGES COMMi5SI0N MEETING, JANUARY�15, 198T 'PAGE 4 easily through the arts than it can through i�ndividual citizens. It is - important for correnun�ties to Melp artists. Artists generally leave a co�nunity because tfiey,feel the society or the piace where they live is not interested in what they do or who they are, or they cannot`firrd work. She'stated the C:€.7.A. programs pravided a Tot of opportunities for artists in corr�nunities. 41hat they d9d in thase programs was tota7ly astoundi'ng. The community'can become aesthetical7y beaWtiful by finding funds so that artists can wark with the community througt� murals,.sculptures, street furntture, lighting, side- waiks, etc. It can be inexpensive or very expensive, but she did believe it shaufid be planned witF� the cormnunity. Mr. WeTch asked Ms. Charles what the source of funding was for the Minneapolis Arts Gottmission. Ms.Charles stated th� Co�tission c�nsists of 1? cor�ission members besides herself. They receive a� appropriation from-the City of Minneapolis: They raise a lot of their own money outside of the city appropriation.` In the past five years, they have rafised over $2 mi7lion that has gone out into the co�nunity. They have b funding program that is a voucher program and the only one existing in 'the'United States that �eals with arts across the board. Any community can cor� to them with an idea it wants to impiement in the arts to!purchase arts services. 'ihe community has to put up one-third of the cost of-the program in cash, and the Minneapolis Rrts Commission puts of two-thirds. 'ihe corranunity does get the money back. Mr. Treuenfets and the Commission members thanked Ms. Cfiarles for coming to the meeting. 2. AfFIRMATIVE AC7ION AT THE CITY OF FRIDLEY: MOTZON BY MR: WBLCFI, SSCOND$D BY MS. NOBLE, Tp CONTSNUE DF5CUSSION ON TXIS. ImEM UNTI& THS NEXT I�ETING. �� � . i7PON A��VOICE VOTE� A�I, VQYIXG RYE� CHAIRPERSON TRfiUENFEIS�DECLARED�THE�MOTION CARRIED (INANIMOUSLY. ` 3. REPORTS ON MEETIP{GS ATTENI?ED BY HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSIONERS: Mr. Treuenfels stated he was elected by the Commission to attend meetings of the Community Schaols Advisory Council. He stated he attended a meeting about one week ago, and th� Gouncil d3scussed several interesting poir�ts, One thing ; discussed was the settling of priprit9es as far as goals. The main issue discussed was funding. Ms. van Dan stated she was una6le to attend tMe kick-off ineeting for the U.S. Council for International' Year of Disabted Persons - 198T, She stated she did'get some material, but had nothing to report at th#s time. i a �s'°'^ �� � � � k � i. �, � ,` . � . �� td stte :�»ti 99_ . S�S �''�ti�� ;tl �: }4 lor� ° i !�� ssi'�n ; �,�tated t�#c#�[► fttr' }:sc�e �r�gr; #rug�as� th� Sh�: i�tpt�t� b� �Y �t�ai�d h� '�� .� �t1._�t�i�ed ti k�' ##' tix� I ion can a�is{ � �;..: ., t� g . . . . ^� .�t � fP':: N� yc� ��% � . ,�� �h �'�S` � �ix� � ��� "�„`�Y_ : . ;��6• .: JAHUA 'r ` �� ` PAGE 5 �.. Y j. l� i�. . .{� a.�. 'i� , . � . . . � �: ai�eAding a Gen��� �, Y?* �#or Family Resour.ces �ic�ad a�_meeting�����, ` T#��s was the�ir quarterly G�`# � y�went o�er f�,d�tZg„` +'�be�s they ser�e i n the si on .wi th fatFter p�t'f�st 5t, Wi t l i ams Church. He ms St: Willia�s�..�rp�i�s f�' their congregati4n. expreSsed a thank�tsu #o h�r for the funding received N GOALS.:fOR 1981i ` e had w�9t#en a le#ter to the.Co���rsion giving a feW ideas ni�g for t981. In tatki#�g�ov�r:t� upeoming year with her sta#.'�' me+�bers, it a�a�s �k►e�e has been a pattern, a3t couple af'years, o�_xsr� af-,t�+e camnissions being reactive c�rme #arom stafF, rathe�.#�ai� �cisfon and pianning tkiings dt�, 5� .stdied thfs was s� �ppt�t�lnity for the Comnission to �-��d v�hat can 6e dune if the Cc�qission is.wiiling�to put �.°i t.- ed that part ;vf the Ct�issittn's LittAtee wil l have to, be spent fr�am servie� organizati�pns. -'Chey could spend some itsme' ���s. rtat on1Y far t#►ei�*�tl� beaa�fit, but for poss•iDle �#;t,y. H�I�oped ot►e of.t�hEtSe.�s,'would he �n affirmative n:rfght�. ' �� �t�e, Ce�nmfssion has t� se� up � project corimittee in a i`�Fiings cauld be acco�'1#�he�i thraagh a pro,ject coa�mmittee, shs�+ld keep:this in m9►�d� the accessihility ta y��i°� b�t��a#�gs and the lack of tY� •handicapped shcruid b�; azi��s9ed. ` She would lik� ta �s art�l ideas:that bave k�en sug�t�eii,through the United t����coal�t �be g��me� go�ls ft� �he�-�c�it��fty Lo work on.� �.Sfie� � � ing thpse iiteas<,ta the �ct ��dng. " i, liked the cpncept of havtitg.s� goals for the ye�r anG � but at thfs time h� s�id ��' 1�ave any particular s�ggestions. ;,. ;� a.:G1i�e k�as appropriated: $1Q�t�QQ`for funding requests. �apris,sion has an 'ided or needs money for so�thing; the subrait:a proposal far fund�ng.: SO7A Hki�! �IG�tTS CtN���#��: � � � e: Cnaraission has re�i�,�r .��tLer from the Le�gue of Rfghts C�ts�ions dsk4ng ft�v a Copy af the Co�nissism's;:by- �- �sion's goals and objectir�es, and pro3ects the Cor�nissron is rg'on. Atso, the League.as �reques��ng membership from lflc,ai r,r € � - x �� n ' nrr . � . ; �,u : � . , �•�� � _ � __--_� �_ _ . �_ . . .._ : ..�.F - 1 car,F ti � MOT24N BY MS. VAN DAlV� SECONAED BY MS. NOBL$,`20 RECI'IYE R'HS ANNUAL DUES STATE— MisNT DATED NOV. 3Q� 19&f1, FROM THE LEAGUE OF Id3'NNESOTA HUtAAN RIGHTS COMMISSIONS� AND THE LETTSR DATED JAN. 33� i981. UPON A VDZCE VOTE, �iLL TIOTZI'IG RYE, CHAIRPERStlN:fiREUENFELS DECLARED 2'f!S MOTIQN CRRRIfiD UNANSMOUSLYs Ms. van Dan stated before they consider �mbership in th3s organization, she would like to know more abaut it. MOTION Bi' Ms. YAN UAN,,S£CONDED'8Y MR. WELCH, 20 R$QFIEST 5TAFF 21� �SPOND T0 2'Hfi LfiAGUE OF MSNNSBDTA HUMAN RIGHTS COMMIS5I�S'REQtlEST FOR SNFORMATZON AND AISD RfiQUEST THfi LE,�GT1E OF MFNN.�SD4'A HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSIOkVS 2'O SEND INFORMATION ABQUT THfiIR ORGANIZBTSON. UPOA7 A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTSD7('s RYE� CHAIRPSRS091 TREUEPIFELS DPsCLAR�D Ti1S MOTION CARRIED UNANI�YOUSLY. AI?JOURNMENT: : MOTION BY MR. WELC11, 9$CDNI�i1i BY'M3. NOBLE, 4'O ADJOURN THS MEETING. UPON A VOSCS"VOTE, RLL VOTING AYS, GHAIRPEASON TREUEDFFELS D$GLARfiD TXE JANUARF 15, 1981, XUMAN RESOURGS5 COMMZ�u510N M$8"1'INC ADJOURNED AT 9:23 P.M. Respectfully suGmitted, Yn���'� Recording Seceetary