The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 02/25/1981 - 6752PLANPIING COhiMISSION MEETING CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: City of Fridley A G E tJ D A 6JEDNESDAY, FEaRUl�RY 25, 1981 7:30 P.M> PAGES APPROVE PLAfJNING COMMISSIOiV MINUTES: FE6RUARY 4, 19£3] �- 12 1. PUftLIC HEARID�G: CO�dSIDERATIOfd dF A PROPOSED NOISE ORDiPJAPlCE 13 - 20 2 3 � PU6LIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PROpOSED PRELIMIIJARY PLAT, P_S. #81-OG, HEFlTHER HILLS lti'EST, BY THOMAS QRICKC�ER: Being a replat ef Lot i, f3lock 3, Moore Lake k{ills Addition, a single fami-ly dlvelling area generally located on the East side of Central A��enue N.E. at 6175 Central. LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L S. �81-01, BY THOM,AS BRICKNER: Split off the East 3J0 feet of Lot 19, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, the same being 6229 Central Avenue N.E. LO? SPLIT REQUFST, L.S. #81-02, BY A& R, DAVID HARr'.IS : Split eff the PVorth 233 feet of the 4Jest 230 �eet of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 lying East of Hiahway No. 65, subject to the rights ef the public over the North 33 feet and over the tJest 20 feet. ther�for for hiah��ay and drive�.vay pui-poses, subject to easemer,t over East 5 feet to fJSP, subject to road easement to Viron Realty, FRO"4 the West 60U feet cf tY�e North �30 feet of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4, Sectiori 12, to �rake City records agree with County records, the same being 169y Viron Road I�1.E. (Frostop) 5. RECEIVE ENER:zY COhiMISSiOiJ t�1T[�;UTES: �]Af;UARY 27, 1951 6. RECEIVE I�iLh'iA�� RESCURCES COP4NiISStO�V I�IINU7ES: fEE3RUARY 5, 19II1 1� ., , ITY DEV i0\ MIP! 21 - 26 27 - 30 31 - 35 ORCHID SALhiOfd RY PINK A. AN Oi;UIiJA�CE E5i/13LISNI�iG CRF;P�ER ?_09 OF THE FRIDLEY � CTTY �GDE EN7T1L[D 'CONVERS�O;i COirDO?•1INIUM LICENSIPI6" as amerid�o and Pir. Herrick's h'.e��;o C�ated January 23, 1981 8. RECEIVE R,PPEALS COPrMSSSIQ� PtiR'UTES: FEGRt1R?Y t0, 1981 36 - 39 YEl_LOW 9. RECEIVE PARKS & RcC"EhTIO�! COM1iMISSIO� MI��L7ES: FEBRUAR'( 11, GREEN 1981 - -- — 10. RECEIVF HGUSING & REDFVELOPMENT nU;iH02i7F' �•1IPlUff 11�. CCNT1f�UC�: PUCLIC HEARI'VG. AM�tiD��ENT 7U CHItNTER 205 OF THC - - ---- - - __ _ --- ---- Ff2I�LFY CITY � CiiDt___G[ Nf h11LLY K��')�d�v NS TNI� � 1:1 LI CY lONIhG CODr WHITE SEPFlRATE CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNIN6 COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 4, 1987 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Harris called the February 4, 1981, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:36 p.m. R4LL CAII: Members Present: Mr. Harris, Mr. Treuenfels, Ms. Schnabel, Mr. Svanda, Ms. Hughes (arrived 7:41 p.m.), Mr. Wharton Members Absent: Mr. Oquist Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner Louis J. Hamlin, Midwest Printing Company See attached list APPROVAL OF JANUARY 21, 1981, PLANNItJG COMMISSION MIPJUTES: MOTION BY MS. SCHNABEL, SECONDED BY MR. TREUENFELS, TO RPPROVE THE JAN. 22, 1981, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITPEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTIDN CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � 1. CONTINUED: PUBLIL HEARING: ZOA �80-06, BY W.6. DOTY AND GARY A. WELLNER: Rezone the following described parcels from M-1 light industrial areas to R-3 (general multiple family dwellings), that part of Blocks 8 and 9, Lowell Addition to Fridley Park, lying South of the North line of Sylvan Hills Plat 8, together with theFasterly 1/2 of vacated Elm Street, and the part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 7, Lowell Addition to Fridley Park, lying Southerly of the Westerly half of vacated Elm Street, located South of Mississippi Street, and East of Burlington Northern right-of-way. Public Hearing closed. MOTION BY MR. TREUENFELS, SECONDED BY MR. WHARTON� TO REOPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ZOR #80-06 BY W. G. DOTY AND GARY R. WELLNER. UPON A VOZCE YOTE,�ALL VOSING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING REOPENfiD RT-7:38 P.M. Mr. B oardmatt stated tHat Mr. Doty had contacted him and requested that the Planning Commission continue this item until the Feb. 25 meeting. Mr. Doty had stated he was getting a surveyor to find out exactly how much land he does have in order to put together some plans for the Planning Commission for R-2 property. Unfortunately, there was not enouqh time to notify the Reighbors. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 4, 1981 PAGE 2 Mr. Boardman stated that in view of the number of people in the audience and the presence of a petition, the petition and any further testimony from the people should be presented to the Planning Commission. (Ms. Hughes arrived at the meeting at 7:41 p.m.) Mr. Michael Larson, 6390 Starlite Blvd., read the petition opposing the rezoning from M-1 to either R-2 or R-3. He stated the names on the petition were just a small sampling of the neighborhood. Many more people support these views and they will'be at the next Planning Commission meeting if needed. MOTION BY MR. WIfRRTON, SECONDED BY�MS. SCXP7ABEL, TO RECEIVE THE PETSTION REQUEST- ING THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO 12EJECT THE CON52DERATION OF REZONING THZS PROPERTY FROM M-I TO EITHER R-2 OR R-3. (Petition 1-1981) � UPON R VOZCE VOTE, RLL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMIW HARRIS DECLRRED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � � Mr. Harris stated the petition was received and would accompany the Planning Commission's minutes to the City Council on this item. Ms. Judy Kidder, 6360 Starlite Blvd., stated they had spent the past week getting organized and contacting other neighbors. They had made arrangements to come to this meeting, and many of them had babysitters. She asked if the Planning Commission could make a decision on this rezoning request that evening as none of theM had been notified of the request for continuation by the petitioners. She did not think it was fair if this was continued. Mr. Harris stated the decision to continue or move on this item was up to the Planning Commission. He stated he was rather upset that Mr. Doty has asked for a continuation at such a late date. Mr. Harrisstated he thought the Commission had made it plain to Mr. Doty and everyone else concerned that he was expected back at this meeting with his proposal. Mr. Rice, 100 Sylvan Lane, stated that back in 1965, they had a problem with a low spot in the Sylvan Hills area, but there were no complaints about flooded basements or sewer problems. After Satellite East and West was built, all of a sudden the City Engineering Dept. was flooded with complaints of flooded base- ments and backed-up sewers. A new pumping station had to be built and water mains enlarged. This cost the Syivan Hii1s neighbors quite a bit of money. He stated that, if additional units were built, would the present pumping station be big enough to handle the extra sewage? Mr. Boardman stated the City Engineering Dept. had looked at this and did not see any problems. Mr. Rice stated that he was told that Mr. Doty wanted a blanket permit to put in whatever he wanted. What is � stop Mr. Doty from putting in 68 units instead of 34? � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 4, 1981 PAGE 3 Mr. Boardman stated that 34 units is the maximum density Mr. Doty can put in on that property with that zoning. Ms. Carolyn Johnson, 6336 Starlite Blvd., stated that Mr. Doty and Mr. Wellner had indicated they were concerned about their financial losses. She stated that before they purchased theland, they should have made the agreement to purchase the land only after it was rezoned to their liking--not to purchase the land first and then decide they want it rezoned. Mr. Longerbone, 180 Sylvan Lane, stated there"are very few double bungaloes in the City of Fridley that are d2cent, and why should their neighborhood be ruined because Mr. Doty wants to put in double bungaloes? Ms. Carolyn Johnson stated that Mr. Doty has commented on how beaufiful his duplexes are on 5th Street. She stated they are not beautiful, they look terrible and are not kept up at all. She wished he was in the audience to hear that. Mr. Larson stated one of the big issues brought up at the last Planning Commission meeting was the opinion that it was not financially feasible to develop this property into single family homes. He stated he was convinced it was feasible. He thought the real point Mr. Doty was trying to make was the maximum profit would be realized by rezoning the property to R-2. He stated their whole purpose. for being at the Planning Commission in greater numbers this evening (and would be in even greater numbers at any future meeting) was they feel any incremental profit that might be realized by developing this property into double bunga7oes is going to be directly offset by their individual homes. They feel they have enough multiple family housing and feel it would be a real burden. They would appreciate it if this request was rejected at this time. Mr. Frank Liebl, 222 Mercury Dr., stated he lives a block and a half away from this property. He stated he could see both sides of the issue. He would like to point out that they already have quite a few multiple housing units in R-3 which have created traffic problems. If more R-2 or R-3 are put in, it would just multiply the problem from a traffic standpoint. He stated Mr. Doty and Mr. Wellner have the right to develop their property, but even an additional 14 units are going to increase their traffic problem. If this property is rezoned R-2 or R-3, he felt it would be detrimental to their neighborhood and wou7d compound the problem they are facing right now. Ms. Jan Christenson, 6260 Starlite Blvd., stated that last sumner her husband was granted a special use permit to build a garage with the intention of building a new home. Right now, as their plans stand, the house wil7 cost around $130,000. Now they wonder if they should put that house there if these units are to be built. What will be the value of that home two years from now if those units are built? Ms. Donna Messer,'l14 Satellite Lane, stated she lives in the second house from the end on Satellite Lane. She stated she watches the cars use this street as a drag strip. A couple of children always play on the blind corner, and they just happened to not be playing there one day when a truck drove up into the neighbor's yard. .-s,.� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 4, 1981 PAGE 4 Ms. Gail Ahrens, l98 Mercury Dr., stated they'have suffered around $500-600 worth of damage from cars that come across their lawn and hit trees. She stated they are fortunate that the Satellite Apartments are kept up as well as they are. but this may not always be the case. She stated the apartment owners should be comnended for the good up-keep of those apartments. She stated if duplexes are added, the whole neighborhood could go down the drain financially within a couple of years. Mr. Liebl stated they are not opposed to Mr. Doty doing something with his property, but they have to look at what kind of impact this proposal will have on this neighborhood. Mr. Larson stated that Mr. Doty could come in with plans for the Taj Mahal, and if it is in an R-2 or R-3 zone, they would be very much against it. He stated that in the best interests of the Planning Co�nission's time and their time, they would appreciate it if the Planning Cortunission would make a decision on this proposal that evening. MOTZON BY MR. WHARTON� SECONDED BY MS. SCHNABEL� TO CLOSE THE PilBLIC HEARING ON ZOA #80-06 BY W. G. DOTY RND GARY A. WELLNER. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYfi� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE PUBLIC XEARING CLfJSED AT 8:08 P.M. Ms. Schnabel stated that last time when they heard this proposal, she seconded and supported a motion to deny this request. She stated she did not have any reason to change her mind; however, she was a]itt7e uncomfortab]e denying it again in Mr. Doty's and Mr. Wellner's absence. She stated the petitioners have paid $125 for the rezoning request and $125 for the vacation request, and she felt uncomfortable den,ying them their "day in court".• 5he stated she knows the residents' feelings and she supports those feelings. Mr. Wharton stated he felt that if the petitioners were that interested in their $250, they would have been at the meeting. Mr. Svanda stated he agreed with that and did not have any sympathy for the fact that the petitioners were not at the meeting. Mr. Harris stated he also agreed. Mr. Treuenfels stated he did not see any reason to continue this item. Ms. Hughes stated she also did not have any sympathy in terms of the money. Mr. Doty came before the Planning Commission unprepared and prematurely, but she did think they owed him a hearing. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 4, 1981 PAGE 5 MOTION BY MS. SCHNABEL, SECONDED BY MR. WHARTON, TO�RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL DENIAL OF REZONING REQUEST ZOR N80-06 BY W. G. DOTY AND GARY A. WELLNER: REZONE THE FOLIAWING DESCRIBED PARCELS FROM M-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL RREAS) TO R-3 (GENERRL MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLSNGS), TXAT PRRT�OF BIACXS 8 AND 9, LOWELL ADDITION TO FRIDLEY PARK, LYING SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SYLVRN HILLS PLAT 8, TOGETHER WITN THE EASTERLY 1/2 OF VACATED ELM STREET, AND THE PART OF LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 7, IAWELL ADDZTION TO FRIDLEY PARK� LYING SOUTf1ERLY OF THE WESTERLY HRLF OF VRCATED ELM STREET� LOCATED�SOUTH OF MIS52SSZPP2 STREET, AND SAST OF BURLINGTON NORTXERIJ RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE REASONS FOR DENIAL ARE: 1. THE OVERWHELMING FEELINGS OF THE NEIGHBORXOOD AS DEMONSTRRTED BY THE NUMBERS OF PEOPLE AT BOTX PUBLIC HERRINGS AND BY THE PETITZON THRT WRS SIGNED BY THE NEIGHBORS; AND � 2. THAT MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL ON THAT PARTICULAR PIECE OF PROPERTY IS NOT IN TXE BEST INTEREST OF THE NESGHBORHOOD WITH FEGARD TO, BASICALLY, TRAFFIC AND THE FRCT THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD ALREADY HAS - R RATHER HIGH IMPACT OF MULTSPLE DWELLINGS IN IT. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Harris stated that ZOA #80-06 was recommended to City Council for denial. Mr. Boardman stated this will be set up for a public hearing at City Council on Mar. 9, 1981. 2. CO�JTINUED: VACATION REQUEST, SAV #80-14, BY W. G, DOTY AND GARY A. WELLNER: Vacate that part of Minnesota Street, as laid out in Lowe I�Addition to Fridley Park; or Mercury Drive, as laid out in Sylvan Hills Plat 3, now known as Satellite.Lane, lying West of the Northerly extension of the West line of Starlite Blvd., also being the East line of Lot 1, Block 4, Sylvan Hills Plat 3. Mr. Harris stated this was not a public hearing, but they would conduct it as an informal public hearing. Mr. Boardman stated at the end of Satellite Lane, the City has some street right-of-way. 7he eventual plan at one time was that Satellite Lane woutd cross the railroad tracks. He stated this is not going to happen. The petitioner has requested vacation primarily because of additional land for development. At this time, the City has no problem with the vacation. The City is not using the street right-of-way and will not be using it. Mr. Miehael Larson, 6390 Satellite Lane, stated he is really the only one affected by this vacation as his lot line adjoins the easement. He has mixed feelings about it, but he will not oppose the vacation in the hope that he wi11 see this property developed R-1. If there was any chance it would be developed R-2 or R-3, he would speak against the vacation. r�r. �oardman stated he wanted everyone to understand that he cannot keep the petitioner from developing industrial if he so chooses as this property is presently zoned M-), light industrial. �MOTION BY MS, ffUGHES, SECONDED BY hII2, Tgg(�NFEIS, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVRL DF VACATION REQUEST SAV N80-1¢ gy W, G, �TI, �D GARY A. VACATE THAT PART OF MINNESOTA STREET, A,S LAID OUT IN LOWE P11RKj OR MERCU$Y DRIVE �'LLNER Tp ��LS LAID OUT IN SyLVAN HT LL ADDSTION TO FRIDLEY SATELLITE LANE, LYING G7EST OF THE NORTHERLY L� PLAT 3� NOW �rypWiy � LITE BLVD., ALSO BEING THE EAST LINE OF Z,pT I�ENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF STRR- � . BLOCK 4, SYLVAN HILL3 PL.yT 3. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN yARR,TS DECLARED THE UNANZMOUSLy, � � �MOTION CARRIED Mr. Harris stated that SAV #80-14 is recommended to City Council for approval and will go before City Council on Feb. 23, 3• PUBLIC HFAkrNr• o��i�.... ___ _ - `^ .u. �'i1LLtK: -- -'.•• ��c rtKl'9! i � SP #HO-I3, BY uilding 14 ft, x 2peftSeto�be moved5to theArear of theanroxert�n9 accessory used for a storage shed, and a new detached garage, 24 ft, x 30yftndtoebe constructed on Lot 8, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 21, the same being 945 Mississippi Stre�t N.E. ON gpN BY MR. TREt7ENFELS� SECONDED BB MR, ,9VANDA, Tp OPEN THE PUBLIC N80-13 BY WAL.TER J. MI7,yER. HEARING UPON A VOSCE pOTE, ALL VOTSNG RYE, CflAIRh7AN gpggl-$ DECLARED TXE PUBLIC HEARSNG OPEN AT 8: 32 p, �y. Mr. Boardman stated that Mr: Miller was not in the audience. He stated Mr. Mi11er intends to move the existing shed to the rear of the lot and build a new garage off the existing blacktop area. Siaff has no problem with this request, and he has not received any objection from the neighborhood. Mr. Harris sfiated this was a rather large accessory buildin feel rather uncomfortable approving it without talking to the petitioner. 9, and he would M��N BY h%5'. SCHNABEL � TNE NEXT MEETSNG AND RE SECONDED BY M3. HUGXES, TO CONTINUE SP //80-13 UNTIL RT TNE FEBRUARY Zg p QUEST STRPF TD CONTACT dL4, MTLLER AND LANNING COMMISSSON MEETING. � �'K TXAT HE BE Mr. Treuenfels stated he had some problems with delaying a re 24 ft. x 30 ft. garage. quest for a UPON�A VOICE VOTE, HARRIS,�SCHNABEL, AND HUGHES VOTING AYE, T12EUENFELS '�D k'HARTON POTING NAY, G'y,yyg�y�nr �y��S DECL.�RED TXE MOTION F A TI�' VOTF, . . SVANDII, , � AIL�'D BSCAUSE OF � � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 4 1981 PAGE 7 MOTION BY MR. SVANDA, SECONDED BY MR. TREUENFELS, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF SPECIAL�USE PERMIT�SP N80-I3 BY WALTER .7. MILLER, WITN THE PROVZSSON �� THAT THIS GARAGE BE USED RS R GARAGE FOR PARKING..BN�D STORAGE AND NOT BE USED FOR A REPAIR SHOP OR ANY HUSINESS-FOR-PROFIT�ENTERPRSSE. Ms. Schnabel stated she could understand Mr. Svanda's feelings. Her perspective came from being on the Appeals Commission where they hear these kinds of requests a17 the time. As a regular practice, the Appeals Commission has always requested that the petitioner appear before them. ihey feel it is not good policy to routinely approve things because a person fills out an application, pays his fee, etc. By having the opportunity to speak to the petitioner, it brinqs out a lot of information that is not contained in the 8 lines of print on paper. Even though, on face value, it appears to be a very straightforward and simple request, they have often found many underlying reasons and circum- stances. One important thing requested by the Appeals Commission which must be included in the hearing is the hardship of the petitioner--why the petitioner needs what he is requesting. Sfie stated that in this case, there is no hardship shown. Why does the petitioner need this building and why should the Zoning Code be circumvented or altered to permit the construction of this building? For these reasons, she stated she could not support the motion to approve the special use permit. Mr. Harris stated he corrcurred with Ms. Schnabel. UPON A VOICE VOTE, SVRNDA, TREUENFELS, RND WHARTON VOTING AYE� HARRIS, SCHNABEL, RND HUGHES VOTING NAY� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION FASLED BECAUSE OF A TIE VOTE. MOTION BY MS. XUGXES� SECONDED BY MS. SCHNABEL,�TO CONTSNUE SP i180-13 BY WALTER J. MILLER UNTIL THE�FEB. 25 PLANNING�COMl2iSS2011 MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, HUGHESi SCHNABEL, HARRIS� AND SVANDA VOTING AYE, TREUENFELS �AND WHARTON VOTING NAY, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED 4-2. Ms. Schnabel stated she felt the Planning Corrmission should be cautious about these kinds of things. She did not think it was in the City's best interest to act on things when they do not have the opportunity to speak to the petitioner. Mr. Narris requested Staff to ask the petitioner to be at the next meeting. 4. PUBLIC HEARTNG• CONSI�ERATION OF A PROPOSFD PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. #81-01, MIDWEST ADDITION, BY LOUIS J. HAMLIN, MIDWEST PRINTING COMPANY. Being a rep at of Block 1, Great Northern In ustria Center, Fri ey, along with some unplatted land. (See Public Hearing notice for complete legal description) to allow the construction of a new building for Webb Printing Company, the same being 5101 Industrial Bivd. N.E.z MOTION BY MS. SCXNABEL, SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA, TO WAIVE THE READING OF THE � LENGTNY LEGAL DESCRIPTION. UPON R VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNRNIMOUSLY. Ili�� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRWARY 4, 1981 PAGE 8 MOTION BY MR. SVANDA, SECONDED BY MR. WHARTON, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC XERRING ON P.S. N82-01 BY LOUIS J. HAMLIN� MZDWEST PRINTING COMPANY. � . UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRI9AN NARRIS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:52 P.M. . Mr. Boardman stated that instead of replatting Block 11, Industrial tenter, they decided to go with a new plat with the portion in the Planning Commission agenda. It made it a lot simpler to set up a new addition, calling it Midwest Addition; Block 1, Lot 1. This is included in the lega] description so they did not have to readvertise the lega7 description. He stated this property is presently owned by Midwest Printing Company, but they cannot close on the property until this is straightened out. Mr. Hamlin is in the audience to answer any questions. City Staff has no problems with this request. MOTION BY�MR. WXARTON� SECONDED BY MR. TREUENFELS, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON P.S. #81-01 BY LOUIS J. HAMLIN, MIDWEST PRINTING CO. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 9:03 P.M. . MOTION BY MS. HUGXES, SECONDED BY MR. TREUENFEIS, TO RECOMtifEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A PROPOSED PRELIMINkRY PLAT, P.S. i�81-01, MIDWEST ADDZTION, BY IAUIS.J.� XAMLSN, MIDWEST PRZNTING COMPRNY: BEING A REPLAT OF BIACK 12, GRERT NORTXERN INDUSTRIAL CENTER� FRIDLEY, ALONG WITH SOME UNPLATTED LAND. (SEE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE FOR COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION) �TO ALLOW TXE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW BUILDING FOR WEBB PRINTING COMPANY, THE SAME BEING 5101 INDUSTRZAL BLVD. N.E. � UPON A VOICE VOTE,.RLL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMRN XRRRIS DECLRRED THfi MOTION CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � Mr. Harris stated a public hearing would be set at the City Council meeting on March 9, 1981. He thanked Mr. Hamlin for his time and patience. 5. CONTINUED: CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSED NOISE ORDINANCE Mr. Boardman stated this would 6e set up for a public hearing at the Feb. 25th Planning Commission meeting. Ms. Kathy Callahan will also be at that meeting to discuss the noise ordinance. MOTION BY MR. WHARTON, SECONDED BY�MS. XUGHES, TO CONTINUE CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSED NOISE ORDINANCE UNTIL T(IE FEB. 25 MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING RYE, CHRIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. . PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 4, 1981 PAGE 9 6. CONTINUED: PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENT TO CNAPTER 205 OF THE FRI Mr. Wharton stated the Energy Commission has been reviewing the Zoning Code and fias received some recommendations from Staff for the Energy Commission's consideration. He would not like to see this document concluded until the Energy Comnission has passed on their recommendations and comments to the Planning Commission. Mr. Boardman stated he would like to get all the Planning Commission's considera- tions done, so that when they get the Energy Commission's concerns, they can deal only with those concerns. The Comnission began reviewing the Zoning Code on page 74, C-3 District Regulations. Mr. Boardman stated that wherever it is stated "on file in the office of the City Engineer", it should be changed to "on file in the office of the �C��i-t� " Also, wherever it is stated "by the Zoning Administrator", it should be anged to "by the Cit,�". Mr. Boardman stated that under "Drainage and Grade Require- ments," #4-A, `not to exceed four (4) feet" should be deleted. Page 83 205.16 CR-1 DISTRICT REGULATIONS 205.161 Uses Permitted Delete D(Recreational facilities such as swimming pools and skating rinks, which are available to the public) under #2, Accessory Uses. Page 99 M-1 District Regulations should be changed to "M District Regulations" 205.181 Uses Permitted #2-A should be "Offices" The Comnission ended their review on page 106. MOTION BY MR. TREUENFELS� SECONDED BY MS. SCHNABEL� TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CSTY CODE. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE,-CHAIRMAN:HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Harris declared a ten-minute recess at 10:10 p.m. (Mr. Wharton left the meeting at 10:10 p.m.) �� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 4, 1981- PAGE 10 7. RECEIVE JANUARY 14, 1981, PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTZON BY MS. HUGHES�.SECONDED BY�MS. SCHNABEL� TO RECEIVE THE JAN. 24��1981� PARKS &�RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES. . UPON A VOICE VOTE, RLL VOTING RYE, CHAIRhfAN HARRIS DECLRRED THE MOTION CIIRRIED UNRNIMOUSLY. . Ms. Hughes stated that on page 4, the Parks & Recreation Commission had made a motion and they were asking for the Planning �Commission's concurrence on that motion requesting financial assistance from the City Council to the Citizens' Advisory Committee to determine a cost estimate for the construction of a building at the Comnunity Park Site. She stated there was some thought the assistance could be provided on the staff level, in which case an architect would not have to be hired. MOTION BY MS. HUGHES TO CONCUR WITH�THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION IN REQUESTING�THE CITY COUNCIL TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO THE CITIZENS ADYFSORY COMMITTEE TO DETERMINE R COST ESTSMASE FOR� THE CONSTRUCTIQN OF A BUILDING�AT THE COMMUNITY PARK SITE. THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. 8. RECEIVE JANUARY 15, 1981, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION�BY AII2. TREUENFELS, SECONDED BY MS. SCNNABEL� TO RECEIVE THE JAN, l5, I98Z� HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON R VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNRNIMOUSLY. � 9. RECEIVE JANUARY 13, 1981, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. HUCHES� SECONDED BY MR. TREUENFELS, TO RECEIVE THE JAN. 13� 1981� COMMUNITY� DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION�MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � 10. RECEIVE JANUARY 20, 1981, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. SVANDA, SECONDED BY MR. TREUENFELS, TD RECEZVE THE JAN. 20, Z981, ENVIROi�MENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTfi,�ALL VOTING AYE,�CHASRMRN HA1?RIS DECLRRED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 4, 1981 PAGE 11 11. RECEIVE JANUARY 27 1981, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTZON BY MS. SCXNABES, SECONDED BY .�II2. TREUENFELS� TO RECEIVE THE JAN. 27� 1981� APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE, CHAIRMAN HARRZS DECLARED THE MOTION CRRRIED UNRNZMOUSLY. 12. OTHER BUSINESS: Ms. Schnabel stated she had been reviewing old Planning Commission minutes. In the June 9, 198U, Special Planning Commission meeting minutes, one of the questions the Planning Commission had discussed was when sh�uld there be public hearings for public improvements. The Planning Co�nission did not come up with any special definitive answers, but they had requested Staff to write a letter to the Charter Comnission asking them to review this. She thought it was impartant that the Planniny Commission follow up on this as she did not know if a letter was written or if the Charter Commission had done anything about it. She would like Staff to send a follow-up letter to the Charter Commission and report back to the P7anning Commission. * * * * * * Mr. Harris stated he had talked to the City Council at their Jan. 26 conference meeting about the Housing Section. The City Council apparently does not share the Planning Commission's concern about providing the opportunity for affordable housing in the City of Fridley. They seem to feel they have made a covenant with the City to maintain 9,000 sq. ft. lots and maintain the level of affluence they now enjoy. He stated he isfor promoting reasonable and affordable housing in the City of Fridley. Mr. Treuenfels stated he agreed that housing is one of the concerns he also has for the City of Fridley. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. TREUENFELS� SECONDED BY MS. SCHNABEL, TO AA70URN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE FEB. 4, 1981, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AAlOURNED AT II:15 P.M. � Respectfully submitted, LynC�4�"-rL� Recording Secretary � PLANtJING COId1�1I�`SION MEETING, FE4RUARY 4, 1981 NAME MiGhael Larson Jeraid P. Severt �inda J. Severt Qonna Messer ¢tarijane Tessman Judy Kidder @ill Kidder �ob Strom Bill Zurbey Catherine Schenuen Paul Schenuen Mary Hartfiel Jan Christenson Katherine J. Fischer Caroline Johnson Tom Hartfiel Howard Lourien Elaine R. Shupien Merle Longerbone Frank Liebl E. L. Rice Gail Ahrens ADDRESS 6390 Starlite Blvd. 100 Satellite Lane 100 Satellite Lane 114 Satellite Lane 6390 Starlite Blvd. 6360 Starlite Blvd. 6360 Starlite Blvd. 144 Satellite Lane 145 Sylvan Lane N.E. 131 Sylvan Lane 131 Sylvan lane l20 Sylvan Lane 6260 Starlite Blvd. 6312 Starlite Blvd. 6336 Starlite Blvd. 120 Sylvan Lane 160 Satellite Lane 6299 Trinity Dr. 180 Sylvan Lane 222 Mercury Dr. 100 Sylvan Lane 198 Mercury Dr. Page 12 13 PUP,LIC IIi=ARItdG L'i_FORF T!11= r��r,�;r�z;ir, cc�,�atsslot� NOTICE is hereby given that there ��ill be a Puhlic H�aring oi' the Planning Conunissior� of thc City of Pridley in the City Hali at 6431 University Flvenue Northcast on ;ledneseiay, February 25, 1921 in the Counr.il Chamber at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of a proposed noise ordinance. Copies of this proposed ordinance are available at City Ilal i. An,one desiring to be heard vrith reference to the above matter may be hear-d at the above stated time and place. ��RTCHARD H. HARI;IS CH11I RI�ir7ir' PLR�IhlIP�G COh;iiISSION PU?L:SN: February 11, 1981 February 1e3, 1931 oao�r;nr:cr �ao. _ llh! ORDIPIl1NGC RL"I.ATIPdG 70 (!�15f, PR01'If)ihl6 POR THE PREV[NTION AND EL1h1iPJATI0IJ OF FY.CE;;IV� P.IlD Ufl�1c.CESSltRY NOISE, AtdD INi('O51(vG A PENAL'fY I'0�? �JIO�AT10iJ SECT10td 12�i.01. DEFIFi1TI0hlS l�� 1, Air f,irculation Devi.r.e means a mechanism desiyned and used for Lhe con�rolleil i1ov� or ai�• used in ventilation, cooling, or conditioning, including, but not limited to, central and Vaindow air conditioning units. 2. City.Official A noise control officer, police officer, or any other duly appo�nted er presentaiive of tne City as designated by the City f4anayer. 3. Decibel. D°cibel is a unit of sound pressure level, abbreviated d6. Q. 5. d�A. d6A is a unit of sound level. dBA is the ��ieighted pound pressure Tevel by the use of the A metering characteristic and ti•�eighting as specified in APJS1 Specification for Sound Level tleters, SL4-1971, 4�hich is hereby incorpora.ted by reference. For the ourpose of those regulations, dL'A is used as a measure o� human response to sound. Exhaust System means a combin�tion of components which provides for enciose� ow of exhaust gas �rorn engine par�s Lo ti�e atmosphere. 6. 119_ �10 is the sound percent of tlie tirne procedures approved by Control Agei�cY• level, expressed in dBA, which is exceeded ten for a one Y�our sw-vey, as measured by test tiie Er.ecutive Director of the f��innesota Pollution �, �S� �5Q is the seund levzl, expressed in dBA, which is er.ceeded fiifty percent of. the time for a one I;our sur��ey, as mAasured by test proczd��res approved by Che Executive Director of the Alinnesota Pollution Control Agenc��. Q, �oise. �doise means any so�md not occurring in Che natural environment, inciudir,g, L.ut not limit�o to, sounds emanating from aircraft and 1�1qho-�ays, and industrial, ccr�nr<rcial u�1d reside��tial soui°ces. 9, Pei�son mea��s any hu:i�an being, any munici;�ality or other governinei�tal or pu'fiiical si�bdivision, or any other publiC agency, any public or private corporation, any p.rtr,ership, fii�m, association or other organization, any receiver trustee, assigi�ec, agent or other legal rep�'esentative of 5/ 1"�`/t'S s,d t r� e any of thc forr�qoin��, or a��y � he�° ler,al entit �. {� S•. /4�S�1'/�h� �rs�k k6`t!/G�1V��`4s�4'i-i-/6't��r�l;i } �?y'/nt{4�1�14`z/",€iS�Yi9�/ 10. Sound. Sound is an oscillation in pressure, stress, particle ci��placement, part.icle velacity, etc., in an elastic or� pai°tially clastic i�,�'��!��, or tl�e supe�'posit.ion of such propagated alterations. Page ?. -- OR�TN/IPdCE PJO. 15 11. Sound Pressure Level (SPL).. Sound Pressure Level is 20 t'imes the or�ariiTi�n'to�Llic �`�stre� � �hcFortlthef puYi,po esSSOfcLhese r��gulatponso. the refcrence pr , r• the reference pressure shall be 20 micronewtons per square meter. �20 � ��i�'L�, In equation form, `,ound F'ressure Level in units of decibels is expressed as. SPL (d8) = ZO l09 lOp/pr 12. Sound Receiving Unit m2<ms a person, usiness, activity, by noise or noise pollution. unit of property or a building containing a animal life, o�' property which is affected SECTION 12A.02. RECEIVING LA�D USE S7FlNDARDS �, 7he sound level requirerrents of this section shall apply at the or zoning lines of the sound receiving unit. Pleasurem°nts rriay theaenfor�e�ielntlofnother sept o s ofrthis1Chapter�urposes and to 2. The sound levels as stated below shall permitted in each of the zoning districts the Fridley Lonin9 Code. Day Zoning Districts R-1, R-2, R-3 C-1, C-1S, C-2, CR1; CR2, P Ni-�, M-'L Sound lee•els resultir.g f�°om cu�wla.tive travel of motcr vehicles on state and county highti-��ys and railroads are exempt from these Receiving Land Use Standards but not oti�ei° �ecCioris of this ordinznce relating to motor vehicles and raili°oads. T��is dees not exe�?,pt individual motor vehicles from any and all federal, state, or local regulations. It is the intent sui-rounding�figl�,aysedo orllbelo��ythe�re�uireinents of�Ithis secti�onavlen and +vherever possit7le. C-2S, L50 (7 a.m 60 65 75 L10 _ 10 p.m.) 65 70 80 property �e made aid in be the highest sound levels as defined in Chapter 205 of Night L50 L10 {10 p.m. - 7 a.m.) 50 55 65 70 75 $� 3 $ECTIOit 124.03. SOL'FCE ENISSID�; STAi�DF�P.DS 1. �+iotur Uchicles P:oise LimiCs. A. N�l�f4'l'PRb. AYc�'�/!fis't'cV/;'�`;�,, )� /KI`,��/r';/�a�/i'�t��,��/�E/�'A�+X��s�s�/�°��IS/t� el� x S a.r h 1 � tn,`;'�a�s'i'/I�'/;�S��i �is�.; (', i��i/s� `«`� /� `�1��, / Z ��k1 �4 t /� �� 4 �/i`s�,i�� /d�ftc./Y�s� > ¢Yv�Va�)a�l}'��{�as 1 s l�`�1; � /'� � /%> /��'/t ��'i'" k'� `k/F�!` Y � }, ti`4�5/�> /4'�`;'�', 4f� /S'�C��':��5- , , �, i x � t , 5 � , i , ;'��Id � , l/,`/ � "l7i`�'/S S'1 S'1"l'�/4��k`t:h.�/S4}� S�i'/4�{'�� /S ,j� /4�4 I /� :Nr /4 , /rs''1 t { / � / �'�,nt,l;.,�/s':!?�a'�';`/�'k. ,s�/ {,b �t:�ti�'/7��ti�{X,j/s� iV��lr'i � � k/r�t`/`ta ii,rt=�'!//i!�t'/s��1��°}' � � �- t /:%f /4'r `iKJFi��i/�'S�S�I�s��/ ��,, � .�,�F�..el � / '�,-j �� .�y i'i'!",/1,/ ri _F f �{'r i � - �}tA, 4'i � r o r�li 1 t r, i . I . , � �,�ti � �If/;`'.'S�{1�4��4'��%s�}`y� ��1�f�A�,'�li''.ti��y��y � l ��'�P�h.i��Y��l ��)��i- ��;ir��4 r.71��r.Sl�iv � ' � ' 1 ,� i�' r� r`,�.', iyi !�ol t"� 4t%451�i�S�S '�r � r��1�55�{si"S'�?�C�Vt� �"S�S��'t� ti� �f} /,S.i/r 1 � i��'S S/��1 4 i�s t 1,, � { SF�4'�4'HIV��s"1"•��;��r�'i�'ia/il`ti;;;i�1t`1'�i'�'.�/1'� •9/�i�;'�`1�XS5}"!t`�`/!iY`Ii�4'I'ja��P�,� � .,, � t��i��s�v��i�w�Ilir��,�ivodi�nasx�i��xzi��i�sr��i��i��xvi��i��i��i�bal � I6 u�siy-�Vl�s`N�ti7�f/EF�iIV�l�PYI't-d/l;+fllYt��FIYs��/s�s",�f�X�/V�,�k'E4/kE��`/�Vv`t��f f,�r��x��+flf�JYU�vId;�Vt,"143�/,.w��`/�s;;/�;n,�FY��s^�1�9/Pr+UX��'4/3DYC�� T�ie Ninnesoi.a Polluticin Contrul Agency Niotor Vehicle Noise Limits - 1977 (6(4C111t 4.2004) are hereby adopted by reference. e��y, ��-s�i��n��s��+r.tirav��ri�;�; ,+; v��i��v�ti�v�F+��i��v�id�i�tw��i �t�V��!'r�i:GV7!/f 4�5�/�� irlV /�`�v ;��}`k4S!Y-�4�//S`��;�,�i3��r°'r�F/�1�;�R%/�F�Y/L`4"/S�4�EIlY•E�/v�Y-/�/ ¢��KV,+�Gt'��FlB,�F�I�fI�'S;>��lt��'�dt'�S�I��SIV-x�tti`v�?�s�lT��`G`1�1�6ilK�Zld��l�Pl s��y;�i�,��F�sy+��i�ri�is��tY�v�ivs�i�wi��z� SECTIOt� 124.04. CENTI?AL AIR COf�DITIONIf�G EQUIl�'MENT Wo person may install or place any central air conditioning plant or equipment in any location without th2 prior ar,proval of ,��,�j:�/}5fif��`I��7/i the �it�. Windoia air coiiditioning units are exempt from the provisions of this subdivision, except that the noise produced by such window units, as well as by all existing air circulation devices, shall be attenuated by means deemed appropriate by the ,(¢,i%�"//V'JS�Ydys�Y% ��', including, but not limited to, relocation of such units or devices, if this noise results in or contributes to a violatian of Section 12�1.02 of this ordinance. SECTION 124.05. OPERATTOhJAL LII•iITS Recreational Vei�icles. No person shall drive or op2rate any minibike or srioa;mo i e, as set �orth in Section 703 of the City Ccde, or other similar recreai�ona(�v2Ticle not �censea for tra��ei on public sireets, at any time oth�r than betv.�een 7t�-�/�/r�L 8_00 a,m. and 1G:00 p.m. 2, putdoor Power Implem�nts. �o person shall operate ai.y outdeor pow�er imp erient; inclu��ng �ut not limited to � oiver la�•rn mowers,, �;�;1YI�X¢�il"$, poerer heoye clippers, chain s4�,vs, mu�cn�>rs,Ygaro�n tillers, ede,ei°s, driils, or such ot.her in!� �:�r:2nts ues�cne% p��ui�ar�iy 'ior outcoi o use, at any ti�iie other than bet�:��en the houi°s or` 7f��i/�l•s�i� B��'0 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. on ��eel:de.ys and 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.in. on ti•�ze,:encT and holidays. Sno�,� removal equipment is exempted from this provision. 3. C.onsti•uci:ion Activities. Construction ��orl; hours shall be subject to �ectio�is 1�.Tf aiid—�$.Tz of the City Code. Refuse Hauling. Refuse hauling I�ours sha11 be suhject to Section 113.10 ,�%�J of tiie C�ty Code. S[CTIO�N 124.06. PU6LIC NUIS1�Pi:E NO:SES PROfIIGITf_D 1. General, 1t. shall be t�n}��rfu} pa�- any person io make, continue, or cause � be m�dc or continued any distinci.ly and l�udly audiGle noise r � •;,<. e f �,��(,, � i t t t, i{ +rR that. un��ea�pnab�ly JC`4�4��/iht�4`�'S`A�f�;'�/Y�{/4��S��X/V�'�'��q�,./S�S�/t•,SY/i�4�)��/ y;4t7y",1/,F�i'f,{S'�� annoys, d�i.t�i bs, in�ur��e, ni encing��rs th ¢P�'•Y4iV�l 1'ti{I"4�r';"//l�;'>`dt'idlJl�''��s�//ti r�� is'k �'/s�Plti'��b `V��/1'��R4��'/�`l�f /d�v � f'�'/S`�/S 4�s� (!;(X4^ li��,i11.h>--s��ci_�y.,_�i�i_ �ZCn�-i<�l.--ti�tli��i.c:.�t1� i�floy res�cl�_�t_s, The ip��01•1111C� 1CtS� 1�1�011�� O��,l'I'S`� i112 �It'C�dY'Cl�. i�.0 �(; IlU1.SdfICC 11UltiCS lfl V�IO�Oi:l0i1 01 tfil$ �,}'}�ly��p: Qt'ti111.clilS;.i.. �Uj. $di(� CIIUlIIEt'dt1011 shall not h�� deerir�d to be exclu�iv::. ifor ns, Siqnr liri � U�vices, F�i:c. 1he so�md ing o( anv�v�//4��Vt� 17 ��'iyii��Ti�iiij rlevice �iii--�:n w�fi�iClr� nxr.F��pt <�5 �a ��!arninn �of d,m��cr {I4.S. 16��.6�sj.,�v1}';!�l�'r'��x?�7�:'k;�4�ti'r's`.d;�X7��7'dK�t;'i'7v7�i�,�0a�/ � s�v`%��H�%%�Y�'/r,7o'; �r%�"•6`,�;�;!/��!ic!l/�-1'/','..'��/;<,�Yz%�/v!�Vti`��Ylfl/�'1�1�ty4��"l Y/V`t�9r��1�/S�6`�r'lC�°fJKAs';`l'Jfld�;'r`,`l/v`Y/�tRti/�v�C.'��/��'�i��X�i44;11;�4�d�1 �Y1�t4'17�d�r�s'��`�'�s,rh�JJ9.�`v�14'Vlk'��•J�V�I�I��'.'��°dli'v��/;'t�r�Is'd�1Nvi,�!y`lv�Y/ � f�i)'/Y•t'�k�/4'r•f�1t`0/l�`i"JJ[�l-!�;`t';'I;;IAt';�'l1`i"s�lNV�i't�P9.�G�IU�,1¢/P�s't��44;�/S�Y/ �'�S��i��//r�5�f14'�i�/�i'/i�l4�//�`r�l`�,��i�i; /4��k�,��%91/S��S�4�Yf�/Shf�v /S�i`�Y'�y��/�+�/ 6'f �4�l�bi`ft�Xt�s!KYI ��'f.�l /Y!�l� i'i /�V ln;`;v'I ��✓v�,�!t4N,�?YI �lPi"/�Y�V!1�/ ��'Yi'��/��'�v'df�'ls!s"/�i�/�i�;'�;�r�/;��:�`��'�Y./��`0/Y��/��9�t!/h9/r�s�//Asi�l�/ � $a4�'��4��1/k�'�'i7Ql�ll��fd/yl`1`i�7'�Q/��/�S�✓/�i�a°/1�9��/'r1�761/1�f�� P.��dios, Phonoc�!r;ph;, PaGino Sv�tr�ins etc. The y�X;��V`4j 01� using, or ope�rating or perinittirig ��ijJ;�//{4,Thy"yipf, the use or operation of any radio receiving set, musical instrument, phonograph, �a�ina�st�m, r/r//r//rt;hJ machine or other �device for the piroductior� or reproduction of sound ,ip!/��i��! in a distinctl,y and lcucily audible rnanner as to disturb t� peace, quiet anc� co��fort cf the r�eightiorinq inhabi.tants.¢�/1(�/ ��i�u�ki��r�i��,s+s�ri�dx�a��it�;��;�i,��;��s��-r��i¢��Q��i 4��1'[�d/f,%Vl7'.��k�lF�'•r"$�`tir%flt:`-1�;-; ";s/:�'�:�/r��/�N`/ib�s"/f,'s'[��/ �)�(i�4�/ .�(�r{��S'�1��5/!�`��/'�; �''i{`,�{��(4�Fl�',��i'l�f/{r�f� f'-;y �Vil/�'�/{4'�; ��{✓�[�S��/�S(`Yk�?A�/��5�� Y��Y-V 7��{'-1��Y�Y Y��}S{�ilf�f �i'��Y�A�4iFF`I.4 �F �I YY-{I'(:FF�J�FY`S�Y 1-/�J�i C. P;oisy Parties or Gath�rincs. The coneregation or gathering of people froni i�;liich nuise emanates in a sufficient volume or of such nature so as to disturb the peace, quiet, or repose of other persons. D. Lo:id Speak�rs, f.inplifiers for P,c!��ertising. The using or oper�.tin9 4��Po'1V�`tf� 4�a�v��r,� ;�.; �—� kr�/��/ / „-�c%��P�4� �> >ei°mittinc �the �Y��';%�, use oi� operation of an� �','��lttr��f��41/�'��,!/v`��d�x/ ,�v��kP'�/it�?I'1=l/�'vsb�lF�fF1t�'�! Ic:�dspeaker, sound ampli�=ier, or other �`��j,ip`�;S/�% c±evice for tl�e production or reproductien of sound on a sCreec or otL�r public place for i.he purpose of com�nerci�� aovertisi��g or aitrac�.i��g ti�c attention of the of the public to any building or structure v�hich distin-bs the peace, Guiet and comfori: of the neighboring inhai�itants. Animals. �;�//�/_�i',�,�,�//S'�1'�!l�V/�s`t!� The keeninc� of any anin?al that distui-bs the coiaFort or repose of persons tn the vicinity by its frequent or continued noise. Exhausts. The tli�scharge or permittiinq the dischtu•qe into the open air of th� exhaust of any s'team engine, stztionary internal co�ribustion engine or motoP boat, motor t�ehicle, or snoi.mo6ile except thirough a muffler or �ther d-e��ice rriiich o-�ill effe�tively pre��ent loud or explosive noises therefrom and comnlies �vi1:h ��11 apolica>>le state lat,�s anrl re�iilat�ions. hlinnesota SLaLute S�i.t;l1 ai;d tlie Uepai-tm;nt oi P,atural Resuurces r��gulztion requiri;u� mufflers `or sno�,�mobiles, 6 P4CAR 1.0051 (() (1), are adupt2ci by refet•ence ard incorporated in this ordin�nce as full� as if seC cut i�� fu71. � �a�� 5 -- oaolr�n��c� r�n. ^^_ �f'3 G Defect�ve U�Inc1e o� Loarl. The use of any autioriobile, motorcycle or � � veliicle �sb oul of rcp�ii-, so lo�ded or in such manner �s to create loud and unnec,cssary yratinij, gri�dinia, rattling oi: other noise. Loadinq, Ui�loading, pl,�f-�,��/�lv';/d;�a��f�!Unpacking. The creation of a loud ari�xces;ive noise in connectiun v�itfi loading or unloading or unpacking of any vehicle. ze e�av��nr�sf�+��i��r-�viv��a��iir��i��r-��r+is��i��i�axrf�sv��x��i y��,��l�/��/�`�ll��k�xi'�! /i3dr5�S'X�.'fS�lf+}�/41r �'�'4�/�Y'�F�/rr��{ksi"�F��X�S?f�/ yau�¢��is� s�� i; �ri�s=, rv; ��,��;��ri�s.r ��,s��i�r+�as�w��di��ui��zix��x��i z�i�s��y��o��i�rp��i��; ri�ri�z4�; vi��i�r.�rv��i��a��ix�i�n�vu�di �v��r�rr.��i�Y�v��ii'v�rr ��y�; ai�x�x��iY��s�i��i,+�v�M:i��i �ai��i vv��v��s�s�i�4t�i�E1�,�v��1�r.�sii��irE��i�,�s�, ��e�i�ai�N�xa�i��i�s��i¢�ui iG/YdXll d� C^�Yi�V/1'ti�y��d�k6//X4��l��s�s�i.��?,�16f1r�/7��F��"1Y�6��4d�/��IY��X�x,�O�/09/ G!�'��t!�s�]'�/�X�=�;��/XGA��F�/�`��v�d�Y,��`�/�"�r�w�Y/Y�i��dl�/�7s��f�€Y'8l K� D:�,��/61�nV/S�k�,4shd°�/Qdy`V1'S!/�!`•G�>��5�/¢1"/�1��1//XG��/4��FDA/ �Y/��1'IG`��?t'F��Y�l �'5�;��t'-IS�r /�s'�.'I�nXi'��i'Ir�"f�ts!4`-�rl'F�I^ N�/��Ir��/ l�l��'r��S�'6��G��/�V/i`'r�ii4�i�/ti''�,�$�'Y"S%!'�h/`�Y`/'�)��i�,�t /u'IS4�V�:h$/��<4��F$11 Y�/k�:/ ��$$��fZ/k�'%G��r�+%iVisix/��v'$fTC�`�4%�/��ii�'��/s�Vt�l��4�X�b��?�lAl�l$1�t�hl S�Y�s�i'•7/�N�s'r0��1G�/t-6��f'/r�t�lSt�'��1;� Alt/�vE��ssd �lC!�Sr�d��!/�i�s"Pdl�6/�0'/ ��Nlff�'/fixs`�'Fkl SECTI01; 124.07. EY,CEPTIOhd FOR EfSERG��;CY 1�lORIC Operations and acts performed exclusively for emergency �aork �'�;�/¢�'Q.��y',iy�;`/�; ��r�j��!/p,r/��?'/i,�t�y,��`; to preserve the saiety,: rre7fare, or public health of the citizens of the City or for emergency ��rork necessai°y to restore a public service or to eliminate a public hazard shall be exeinpt from the provisions of this ordinance. persons having performed emergency work under this section shall inforin the City of tl�e need to initita+e such �aork or if during non-business hours of the City oifices than upon resumption of business hours of the City. Any persor� responsible for such emergency work shall take all reasonable actions Co ininimize the amount of noise.};�ZXi9f'�fsi�/�1"/y')S�Y`��4f�• SEC(IOid 124.08. POI�dERS AND DUTIES 0� TH� �+OISE COPJTROL 01=fICER l. The noise control program established Ly this ordinance shall be administered by the_Citv•�1� �i`a/4!if'�C�r�J/s`F�;3ti�,��'N't`4'/t��`lYi�v�IQXY�/C"�Eir�9��`. Testing_Procedures. Tf�e City p7'y,i�i�X shall adopt 9uidelines establishing the test procedu�'es and instrinr;cntation to be used in enforcing the pr•ovisions of Section 12�;.02 an� 124.03 imposing noise standards. A copy of such guid<lines shall be kept on file in City Ilall and shall be avaiJable to Che public for ��eference during office hours. Page G -- ORDIh!/1tlCE" N0. 19 Studir_s, __etc.. The City4�Y'i��;�1�� e>> concluct such research, monitoring, �nd other studies related to sound as are neCessary or werful in eriforcing tfiSs ordinance and reducing noise in the city. VI¢ The City sholl n�a4:e such in�,�cstigations and inspections in accordance with laa+ as required in applying ordinance requirements. 4. Noise_Impact _Stat_erg�nts_ The City�i7iF¢,�i�1 ��Y require any person applying to Che City �or a change in zoning classification or a perinit or license for any structure, operation, process, installation or all:eration or project tPiat may I;e con�idered as a potential noise source to submiC a noise impact statement on a form prescribed by the Cit . axu��ii��i: �� xi�v�r��r�i¢taysi��a<.��ixt��r,��o�xir�aim��i��av��v�a��i Ydi��%�i;�'v!t��i YFv��/kv/FI/i�/QxX�b`/!?s�; �'.,��X/YY`Y`��i/;=15�/�lr`��v�,�s�cf /Q�'�'C�,�$��//i �/ �> J�/i'f�;�/l�f'�5�;�/Y��1r`�`k�,`s�; r/i l�; /1"��'s��k'Is%vl ��s=r`D�iY/� �%��X,��/i'ss�l 5. Other Poy�e�'s and D�lties_ TLe Cit�{riy��a shall exercise such othEr por,ers and perform such other duties as are reasonable and necessary to enforce this ordinance. SECTION 124.09. t�ARIAP�CES The ��w�7$/Ir/9�,r`7VY�i�1`� fitv Council this section t.o grant variances fron Ordinance,1J�K/'+/.�,,'!. Variances shall Code. SECTION 124.10. ENFORCE��1cidT shall have authoriLy, consistent with the requirements of all sections of Lhis be subject to Section 6.141 of the Citiy L4�f �Vs's';�?��r/d�/rl�,��/S>k'rr�; iz�'t!r=/�V��F x/t!^/S�fl%i s'� 1'/1'� /�l��vKr'`d/P�'�/�i/��lG�X��'/ v�s+�r � $,ll. Criminal Penalties; 7he violation of �i�i�� all_ provisions of this orcfinance ercept Scction 1�G 03 Suhdtivisson 1, shall be =��;,iect to Chapter gpl_of_tiie �ltv_�OGE?. �r�f��tfi�i� ��;'��±�'•��s��S-i)"r�S�Y�k{}��Ja��4`rN��1�f�i�� ¢i. � i :�1 t �a �/t� ii+ iq��'d .� f � d+ �tr! H�r J/ PYF'F��i��i'��iXS�fi��ii��''7�i��-z ��t'f'IPfr� n F�� S�P!lP�Y4��i�/�r/Z�WY-1•Ya� d¢,:"i�l�.� V ifi''t I �y ili�i�r"� iv.•l�i� R7;�r��rG��s-t-;��➢/Ar/S�s-/FC�if�/>�Y/��i�:Lt�-�i�r-f��1-Y/ F�.y". 2. Civil Action. The provisions of this ordinance i�ay be enforced through in�i�iictioi�, n�andamus> or other appropriatie civil remedy- $EC7IOPd 12�i.11. SEVERADII..I1'Y If any provision of tfiis ordinance or the application of ecy provision particular situation is he.ld to be ii��;alid by a court of co-��tent juris- dict:ion, tL•e reinaining portions o� i.;�e ordinance and Liie :�plication of �-�{'� t�n� othce situation shall not bc invali�ated. o� inance o �• y � to a the � __ � su�3�!:cr [:ITY raG= f=ii1:JL.�;', i; �.;a.i� un:ivsa+s::� rv nv�.. nc_. -I r��aou:v� rnni. c;::n�2 �a��i ��-:�'^�so � ZOhllf;�; F;CTIUFJ V�1Cfi I lOP! PL�iT URDIhiAWCf I�0 LUA 11 , S11V !i PS l�� ?-__ �.,�, d...�. PUl3LISIlED A,DDRESS ,! --- DATE ---- PLAf;'JING CU�4t4ISSI0ld: API'RQVFU__ DJSAPPiZUti'�U`� DATE �i_5� �/ fd0? CITY COU(iCIL: PUi?LIC fILA{�I1iG DATi _ 1Si RFAU_ 2PiD REAC! CITY COU(dCII: P�PPROV[D_ DISAPPROVED .! DATE �y�_ PARY, I"[E R't:QUIP.ED: STIPULATIU�S: Ai �OUi�IT PF�I D NAME ��iuma� �p°��°��'cr _` FEE` c3l0.� _P.ECEIPT NO %�� STREET LOCATIQfd 0� PROPERTY �/,� CGK�r� /!�•' �- — - LEG.AL D[SCRIPTIO^l OF PRGPERTY �Cof (,�/k3 6.'�oorc I�xH- I-�%li5 PRES[hdi ZO�tIP�G CLA,SIFICATIOId ,e / EXiSTIPlG USE OF PROPERTY %'`"9�e��""'��.. ACREI�,GE OF PP,OPEP,TY��'�"��• f)�SCk1BE 6R1EfLY Tf�� PROPOSED LCilING CI_,^IfICATIC� On TYPC,O� USE AWD IiiP�hOVEIiE�dT P�:UPuS�p �`�6 �--G*K;'� _..-�"' �� '"'� S'��/,�,�,.,) �-1Ll�' �'f�t', �� `'��/ /1,i� /.� -;-�: i;'z � ---�`= - Nas tfie present applicant previously sought t:o rezone, plat, oUtain a lot split or variance or special use permit cn the subject site or part of it? ___,Yes �_nc. tdhat t�as requested and when? _ The undcrsiyned under�*..ar�ds that: (a; A lis+ of all residents and ov+riers oi' proper- ty taiihin ?50 fe�t musi be a'�tached 'o this application. (b} Tliis application miisY. be s�yi;ed b� a�l�i �t-rners of tha prcperty, or an exolanation giv°ti whY tl'iis is not the case< (c) Re�po;isiuilii)� fa?• an;' defect in the prcr.,eeding; resulting frem ±he fai7ure to lisi: the nam;� e,nd :idd;'ess�s oi all resiuei�ts ano property o�•mers ef pro: perCy in questior�, belurigs te tie ur,dersigned, k sl:etcE� of pi-oposed prop�r�.Y anci stri�ct�n�e must be drawn and attach�d, sl;o�+ing the f011ottin�: 1. fdorth dil'ecti;ion. �> l.ocetian of oroposed siructure o�� tl�c lot. 3. Dimensions of properCy, propesed structtn�e, and front ancl side seiback=e �!, ;Creet naraes, 5o I.ocation and ��e of adjaCOnt existing buildit�gs (within �50 ie2t). The undersiqr�ec! hereby riecl,:��es ih�.� ail the facts and �epresentations sta�eci in this applicatiun are true and correct. � � � �' � �_�/1PILIGF �:, ��.,,: D^,T� ` L ----- SIG"'��lL';t[.__.� ----- r .'.. , - - - --_._".'_ _. _�. __ �__ __ "'�� . t�il�j - � % : . 11ppE:E S� � _ � ; .. - ":- , - ---� - ---- - .-, fll_EI'IIOi;E NO_; _- �--------_. � 19E;1 POLICY STATEMENT OPl PARK FEES 22 ON LI1ND SU�DIUISION � Uate_ 2�5�p� In determining fair market value of public areas for land subdivision for cash payiiient, as required by Ordinance f33, the following values urill be used: Residential subdivision �1,000.00 per lot Residential lot split � 5�0.0� per lot Conu�ercial/Industrial subdivision or lot splits $ 0.015 per sq. ft. This fee is to be paid at the time of final plat or lot split approval. The City Cou.ncil may defer collection to the time a building permit is requested for individual lots created by such subdivision/lot split. 1he City retains the option to accept an equivalent amount: in cash from the applicant for part or all of the portion required to be dedicated. PARK fEE AGREEI�IENT The undersigned understands that according to the City Platting Ordinance, the follov:ing public park land dedication is required to plat residential, commercial or industrial zoned property. It is further understood that the public park land dedication or• cash payment equivalent is at the discretion of the City. It is agreed that a c.ash payment of $ will be paid according to the above stated policy for the follotaing subdivision/lot split. It is agreed that the folloo-�ing land dedication is provided according to the above stated policy for the follorring subdivision/lot split: Dedication: Subdivision/lot split: The unoersiqned further aarees to notify all future property oivners or assigns of the cash�payirent requirement, if it is to he cellected at the tiine of building permit. DATE 0034A/10G7� S1GtJATUGE Property Owner � ..: Planning Commission February 10, 1981 City Council PIAILING LIST P.S. #81-02, Heather Hills West by Thomas Qrickner Thomas Brickner 6249 Ben More Drive fd.E. Fridley, I�N 55432 Mr. & Mrs. t�alter Jacobson 6266 Ben htore Drive N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & f4rs. Robert Carpenter 6258 Ben More Drive fJ.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Adib Sissi 6250 Ben More Drive N.E. fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Robert Qsinan 1431 I:erry Circle N.E. Fridley> MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Joseph Williams 1421 Kerry Circle N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Aizton Potami 1411 Kerry Circle fJ.E. Fridley, A1N 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Alvin Gill 1401 Kerry Circle N.E. Fridley, M� 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Robert Donaids 1400 i:erry Circle N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Daniel Schumacher 1410 Kerry Circle N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mike 0'Bannon 5298 Fillmore Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Steven and Carol Butgusaim 6160 Kerry Lane PJ.E. Fri dl ey, P�1N 55432 Bonnie J. fater 6096 Woody Lane N.E Fridley, MN 55432 Margaret R. Nelson 6090 Woody Lane N.E Fridley, MN 55432 tdr. & Mrs. Clinton Strand 6122 Woody Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Clairmont 6128 Woody Lane PJ.E. Fridley, t+1N 55432 23 Mr. & Mrs. Wayne Welch 6115 Ydoody Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 KiYong & I1-C,ee Kim 6105 lJoody Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. George Lohmer 6095 4foody Lane N.E. Fridley, P1N 55432 Richard Hartfiel 6271 Central P.venue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Harold Morgan 6245 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 LeaBraaten h1r. & Mrs. Frank Demello 6134 4Joody Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Iszbelle Jordal 6133 4foody Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Loren Adolphson 6131 ldoody Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & h;rs. l•Jalter Rydberg 6127 IJoody Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Mark Bue 6229 Central Av2nue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. George Skirner 6217 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, P•1N 55432 P4ax Saliterman St. Anthony Village Center 25 University Avenue S.F. Minneapolis, MN 55414 6arry Pierce 6132 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Y.arl Kreter Pir. & Mrs. William Gagner Scott �. Kohanek 1420 Kerry Circle N.F. 6125 ldoody Lane N.E. 6116 Central Avenue N.E. fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 ^ � COON R1P10! � _ ,� �G q£ �p u 8 ,� o.. i.w,1 e k - C `� f% < � 8 �� e } k.�.� ----.� ' �� ...�! � �!,� d-i� 'lier:,: a 5� � ,'`';t`�'._....... � � i.,„ � � ��' V �� aLl-• � 3 -1A11ro �. � p� 1 AMOK3 CQ � 11!TMNfPIM1 CO IW W.C�K\.IS � � YwxO I�SE �uM JI •�I� 6 L. �L. n�,�1! �.... I �;�. � _; > z /�, ��U:S�IY �-��,£`�; I �� (.,,�Sfl, t S .. `L-'.11 o-,'--�/lnr" �iitF �r=--"~-'j� ...p.�.. � �4 WWMBi1 '� C HEIGNTS STR��T k9A.P-C17Y fJ� ��I�R �� 0 a333 6,680 �� F��'�`�:"gi",�`"�:"� 24 � .: � '+ � t o b'Nw v.v . .. J, � �. . 3Lt . ' � � "':^ HO ( ' iPG !f✓r .'� 1.. . .. 4 jS �• � - ,-.f.� � ,>�M � 6 3 Fs `� - ` :� ' , ; �_ ;------� ,».��"�" 7,.��'i� q . � %„4'-�1GOO) , � ti3so/ I /z6oJ I�.�d' i (iioa/ � (rozo� ' �� oi -�� _ � ; �-- . � . __._ ° � % .♦ i 3�rf7 t �. �� %�_' � ✓ � I �- .1 � : s a' "4 -' , , I / b " ' 4 � Y � (0300 ' � L3is ` (271 ��, +� .' � %3/5 �,/%`c . - ti (4Z0 � l329_� 1 � � /825 t 1'f�'r/ � ' , � ,��;: .�- .:'., _ tf�r K�'v��'e � �^`i. � ' .:s irs, •� r .. L, - � � � n�n.. . i -� -RICE �CREEK ROAd �`°� �� . � � i: • •. �� ,r ; � , GT�N ilbD. ---- �r � . '• %24I.:._rr�' � I ,^��..-vs � lh'OO " .n' e.,�J-7: - l430 ' .. i. � • , � !�. \ 70 . t L. � 62�I .ti � , a ��rk ti '13 J �y . . . j ii. �� \ Y�= . /lY: �� _ )9? _ )��\: . . � . �. O. 'Ji�I(t�� {— .y � . . JS 1 . � I' . . �LG 4 / �f . 1 _� � _ .� ;� � (r.r�> . � �� (tisq .. ^tcJ: � . :(."t�s>)� I. . �:. 62.83 � . � .. ..� G�r�y . .i�: < �� ' o., I c � ' �'t w � ' ire Z - . �ve rr.., _. � . 'Y9 -. '� v . � i � -•....f � �1.� F .�t C � _ _ • b2-7! - � � ..,-•� � bz71" Z ;.,J � 5 � G •. G��rS � � -- � , z •, \f f �1�� : � t 6 �� . !° �..__ � s , - �I ` .. f �/�' '; ' �� '.5 _ P'i0 � � . �� $(� 1�� ' .!r /� (�J�� ` � . (T �Y+: 3S'1�9._,r` y � � . . — . �� t�a. �yFtNE ,: . � �o bzzq 6�� '�, "-- � o b2..- � , ; � . . , : ' ;:o. . �r�; o by'- Q� ,-�62n5 �'° 624< 4 �,W aua. 19 � ��_t�� . '�g 5 E � �,zoa; � � � �-� - . _ _ . _.. � �\�' ., ys,� 3'B_��SR�' .,,,. ` .:-. • � '� � G24o �_ 4 �, 6 z �� •F_,�5.b�- ��Z�a � .,F ` } �. - . � - �� :7.i�,- �,%i ` 1 � ti r . c-- e� 20 ° � :� ! R. .� . ,. 3,e�-- - '?. ------ -- $u6. � � / `-��B �.2a � - `„ bZ3 (, ��': (2UD) . � _ic : 9 _ _ ��•�. t� / . t!� � . . '��. � ��.' ^�. i °� \\•�`�-�%-�°-�� R�ar� �-..`�� E... � �`'`, ��<I?, ,�; � � �t .. �, r�� {r�'� 4 ��`�� • ,;��J� � .� ^� i �,,,,�r�`;..�-,r- V �. (T � � @ �� i..."'a l t �� ` .Vf\l � �� 1 ` 43 i1 5' � C�,t . `>� c� �. � �;,. t;.; �� , �. �-� ` � ! . yf, E e . J� � ��\�,��'�,'`° � �°a t`:'i l¢00 <: ,'�• L ^� x S �"� i �. � s a� ,; �� ,.�.. ,�`�� . , �; _� �,�! � 7 K �� ``.,, +,r��o`�. ° w;, ! �4. `� 'e � �.,_3 �Sq ` i � �: O \'% y� � � i,�f "�a `•d �� '. f SS t�t . � ''°° .t `j � e�,v��s\ i. . ��\+.�y� 't,e' �'!4 \`r°<.�, p r� IC J . � � `�Z�'e��s.�"`` ��5!' i�l��`�. ,�f�� ai77 ' - � f ��>�� :.a . .. 50�� bi33 613r I }�� f .a� , �..Y . ./.wo. � . b«..L�C�. y„� . � ' .__'.� o�_%'.t 6F9pf „ 7 � 3 M �� P�� ' j � �fs � . � �-: y�- ,:� �� 21�' �,125�'a ,Y� e {�s�✓ � 4 , o � �z4a br32 �� . , F, , � A - t ,� � . _ � : !_ . �;�so � N 5_ � i; p A. � = 2�-G/0 � � ,� 3 �j .o ' W0C3 Y L F �.A��,-� �� .ii��/ tvc�o:��,. _ — r i'r a � 6F : -, :r, � «�- .. �U - �;�boJ � ' t�� 60 :h ysa e : . `, _: . � e �� aa _- s� �A ;_' � �j G�/6i �, t � `� ; G 9s `t " r° , ° , a 5 �. � �"} � P •, ,� _.��. � 8 a ` t�J. � y 3Rfl ;�+GD, i . .0 c:._ g.i' � �. � � � /� `�h� r �I �'l. � . . ' r F. (>LOff . _ �' __ t-f `�_ �� • . � ao _ sir� c��;Fr�-� ��.. f r , sEjc. is'� � �' .,,; .. . � , . _, 1 . _ . . � ..� _� . . _ � .. a �� /,��y �t> i ,� I a E � �� p � _`... .. . - __'.. \a .. . . .._...�.. .�..�.lKC.t. ... � i �. �� AS .. : � � . � } } µ n ' t � �/ , . - �1 4..} .�... _�, s'.� f �j j (��,.r } � � � ��I�` �< -.�4 :�� y �� i �� /�� f �,, I J . ; _J T -1 � �i� l f j� i .. . . ,... � {%'. �} ( � � ,� ,l � t� ,� �3 � i . lf� 'S �" .�.._-��--'_ J� l/' {� 1.,.% 2 ' � �nJ. \ i � � 5 /1, .. � /� r i��.3. F (� 5��1� �i � _ a .� �` . �l�` �k �4:,.vt t / �'r �'' I i , , :� � Z � , ,4 � . . � - � !�}, 1 � f � � .,� � -i i � � � ''J�� . , , -, J � � � j �° �1 �-_✓ � � ,= � �,- � r , � r � , " ' ' , � ; �i s:, lt•' , � i � �• '.� � i 4..: � �� ._..:_� �i�...! �r. 4 5 �` .µ , i , k � '..[ - �' . < f � ,o. ,:-�-` ,,�.'� �_.� S C� � � '� ,: .. � t S � 1 .r/ �° C_y,n..r+ 1 �.� '� d i r 1 _ �. _ r � - � ,. ' ' � � , � � i . .-..., „�:•,�> ,,•\ y- Y - ( " ` i r � . J - /d � x � �r.., ,r } / ....-- . �-b/ _ f' j, 1.,� � % � r i � S J �i � � t � �� 'd� '� _. J � C. �` � } i t ' - � . �� YI Jr � � i yr 51 � j� / rJ -�. • � ~ i ��•i � s�� I ___ � i ,�� ..� x .Y- _L- ? _ ` � 'l . t f � t-` ' , i �i ` .�� . .�- I t 1 .— � _ . a ��: 1 ' � ^ ,� � ��r ��A - i / '` � v � �'_ . p '� � ""__ ��„ r � '�'.,.�� t . t �, e � , l �. ' t_61 i � 4�..�4t.�f�+1 �^ ��1 �'`! 1 ( � '�� 6��i` ( �' r 'i�'> .f . � � � � � � j� ��....� �t �� - �<� s, i t p I , � �' ( � p. d : � 1, % f - y l y �r� ) �,.e'l � � P � �' / 1 _i) 5 � . � ,.�i4 - ...i''� '�( � . i . . 'i � i . �� i ...-� I . ) " . .' i /, � ( 1 4 �1 - q �� 1._ � �.0 1 , .. £, - f� s __.�. _ ( t J... !-.' ' i �+'� .___._..�_� `t � ` �.�. .r� . / �l t � � � � ' i � �3 r � :4 � � t � .� � , c�y- _ ln , _. � �r _. .. � �� i ; � � r � I � . .~� 7:.� � i/'� �t � � -' t ( ,,.,8�.�� • . < . -r- . - � A _ .� � � �., �'.j � �� " $"� � � ' � -. � / � / � . . d ` � � � � j � � ' � � � ; I r � i n � i < �,.,1 .. � �. ` r �1 � . � �..��"� � '. . A ` . t ! �, r i . + .,•�+,� \ � a� i ��—, a�r e `. t � k- Y �� r,.� vf.�x�� .ar.�ur;�,.:ea, w. fi.' r .rb_ \ ,v... . :.a - t.,. 1 �+—�y.� \ . "� � I `, , i x �� i i . � ti« ...�_ � �� -��' ....i� I J �/'-/ l . i.c , .�_ � �.d � . ` ` t : � � �s a . � i . i,.f ' � - � ii � t L } , ! , ( 3 .m... e.. .s. sw. ;: w..�.. . � � � 1 r � 1!�, i �� G�\�: t` •'� � 1.... r r v'� � y��i � . .� � r a a = \ - � 1�.. � �... P' . I � r i ' � $,"A'/F�� . -. ' ��^4`.�F` r �� 1� � 9, '-� J�A � i / t q � ' � g`r, � � f . . '� 4 (''x`e? . � ! � ! � � f � � � 1 � � t �� 1 � l� � ' ! � t` .k: �1 � { - T ii `y � � �.i � _ �. . �' � ! �. � J � J � � � C 5 I • \ \` � 4 1~�Y 7 ni t . � / f ' i ' ; � ' �� v t .� \ ..��, a.:A+. ,., �. � � , , s � . � s : Y 5 � i„� ^., ;��5; � i t��.� �• `-i.� � Sy �`� y ; �_7��y� v 4 . 1 ( � _ i ? . . °. ��V t� ;�� 1 � � '� ,i i �� a � �- `� . � ` , l / � � , ..j " �.i t � � ��_'�""�;,.> >. � ?� # V � hi i ��.' �.,,, .. _ � . i � I _� C� 'O — � d..��=� �a�` � z � �_� � , -- � _, .�"• �s 1- , a � i � � 'u' c� , , � ,a' "_". ;_.r' F �� ,�' .. 4: ', vz, N t t C2 r y, ` t /r �, Y `. � � ��'.� ;' .,,�.,.,, � � _ r s � < , � ��! r . /$�� i . � . : , . . ;4 � ` f _irn �,TM � ' f . ,.: � -- .,. . pa4 � 1 .....` s S \, \ . ;l � � � � ' � � �,_�%�� - � � ,.� � � , � ' ` � � � �, , � �' � � _ _i � � ',U� �.r..�° .. -" /��,� I� O r ' �� 'S� -� Ji � / ��A � � � ' ..�� ` i jf ,, . � %1 � { 3 I �� .� .'� __ —,j� rl . i.i i. ° 4�„ ' �. / j ` �' `�� (1 �, �„ _ i�. .1 ��A� ,.'`� � �..m , i50�� ' ��ii0� � . �� ZleC4t�i �r � � __ j� � �AP�.ele�..4.�Yliv.«.�.4 ++k`�3 P . ��.a, .(FY'.+.t' '� .� .. � (aCC• � E � � . -:. m� � _ � . � .� � � . � e� `� 1� � � � � . i ! ��`l' 1 J `w...,.., 7� 5 - . "� \ . � � f � '.F.� � � . . .. 1 4 ) ..i ..3� (� . 4. ,f / . _ . i �' 6 � •-��.. t � ' r`� '� � � .�� j f�..,-.-t" w t �� __"'.. � �j�y � y jr'�(t^a . _ ( t'.Y� . . ' 1 .y ._ � �, f-��4.. :� � � a �, . . � � � ` � f!' � � � k ' ��, � � � t �, � � j -' ! � • ... `� � t ��„'-+.-.�� /� / � ` .,�,... l , �f - � � 1.t _ � . � � � P � � � / 1. � �- ': -.•1 �v_. �.� „ , _ „ r I .. .. ... . �_ .. . 1 � : 1 , � � � _ - :. � ._ �t, � 4 �� , � _� ��_ , � `� � - ; ' " ',. .;.. : ,. .<ts ; °�. „�' .�_� t � <<'.\�t, ( -..- ' , _ _.:� � ,_; r. . _ , . . - . - • � ' , �� . J o ��. i � - . { " 1 � t� . ' ' YR� � �� 1 \ r� �. � � � � , ...1 � 1 � , � . , i'.S � i�. . ._. �. ;.. , .:. � : � ,�' � � ;�. . , i[.<-,' , . � ; , �._.. . ,..,� _. . ` i .i .,_:. i:. .��.c.,.,S .ti.,i�, . : = � . ; ._.. . .;.. �... .. ,i . . . . I - ' ) . .. J . ... _. n.. ... . L ..i�1Y �� a �.-.� . " ' � � . - . 1 . ' .. r.:..... )-`� . �.-.,�. 19II1 POLICY STATEt�ENT OM PARK FEES 2� OW LNDID SU�DIVISION Date / �5�81 In determining fair rnarket value of public areas for land subdivision for cash payment, as required by Ordinance 63�, the following values viill be used: Residential subdivision $1,000.00 per lot Residential lot:split $ 500.00 per lot Commercial/Industrial subdivision or lot splits $ 0.015 per sq. ft. This fee is to be paid at the time of final plat or lot split approval. The City Council may defer coilection to the time a building permit is requested for individual lots created by such subdivision/lot split. The City retains the option to accept an equivalent amount in cash from the applicant for part or all of the portion required to be dedicated. PARK FEE AGREEMENT The undersigned understands that according to the City Platting Ordinance, the folloo-iing public park land dedication is required to plat r�::sidential, commercial or industrial zoned property. It is further understood that the public par•k land dedication or cash payment equivalent is at the discretion cf the City. Tt is agreed that a cask� payment of � � will be paid according to the above stated policy for the following su division/lot sp14t. It is agreed that the follovring land dedication is provided according to the above stated policy for the following subdivision/lot sp7it: Dedication: Subdivision/lot split: The undersiqned further aqrees to notify all future property otiJners or assigns of the cash payn,ent requirement, if iC is to he collected at the time of building permii:. DATE _ — - � �' SiGNA�lUltt Froper�ty �wner OC3411/ 1 �G7A � f \;j`�' . „✓�' �..;�� wan nnaios � i i�i�� . i r r � ' �,. � �. l 'li �� i. _. � w xf �� : a`� c 1'�/�rl � 1 �n uf � �t �, 4f 1[ II �� . t � � ! � ��, t z � � � ��I�.� 4�°,' � � ! `� � � a �� y 4M1�eoi,a *�__� nd x $ H I � & AINE � `. . , saaiHC i�KC vwK �� s,�u �� r � I�,?� � �y � ' BY i �—N .,.. i . .. ` ��t� - -�i- :,:': �:� ;� ";°�°` ��.�,e j:�- n�:�� --i,�_ � e� ,� m q �.��,� � 9� � . :i r 29 I,bCAT �� {i `� ��, � n, _.. �ZJ '� ul.-: � j a � . -� � - �i : � ,, i� ,'..� ` � _ 2 g� , 1 >�C�i L_� `w-�� ..�^��. � +� ik�u�� ,�..a i \ _._�' �'-- r ys � . rz b 4V" , I ��'�5�``— �` � d w ( ty {- F� P •�ry � Y R 1 i `� T��f"_� —"'�A�. I F9�� j�� i� -'� i.. � p- Y 1 �:; � �� , i �� ,� ,� � �' ; ,, �i 1,�., � 1 �i � _ ,. � , ,� a �. �, s ,..woo. . � i t �� .�-,a� �J �� . �� ' 19,- .b1i�..L� r ��,, �,r- a:- a;, ; �� a o .jE�, cowweu g e eEieMrs � ic�. I �. � H��: r ; �;A'i I� ��?` � �n�� i 4 l f �' � �,,. � �. N � � � ' � J 1. t I ti w��a�� n J� �I � ( � � 1 � � � 3,..i;.. ..s r _.1.._ .. i. � �� ; i i � 1� (�f � t�. i� i j1 � q i�y � ,..• co f.t`� # i 1�"' � d_.iw co. ti - An»[�Pttl9 S7�lEET t'�A_P-CIYY OF ��I�i�� p 3333 � 6,688 .�, ;:_.T�.�---->•;:�..�,� S� � ♦ i � i/'N N-JMI/ � ` � . � ___ �V ~ rAOF . I /�� ..� ioa �w . _ � 3.[ri'� . . , ,-'' ,. . .. .� RGti.r. � .' s . ilf ee . i� .ro � F .. r��"' J s -�--- � ,, 4 3 45 - . � _-- �� 4�" �ER,R�C�. c.a , � i.i::rrv�1 : �3`t'! . Gr�so> G�ea ; � i ' .�,02 30 '+ ` s //Op -�. � �, ; � : � ^� � : o� j C>,ic+r �1 '6r A . . ; y. .. . 4. , .__ ssi�T �� ---5 R . /¢' . + /2- �t% � �' � i � _� , 5 ,;. 300 ' ;-- -. " ' y � ; . 4 �j � !z7/ ' �' 6 , . /y ti , , 1 ib375 ..F�t{M�� • K %3/r, •o - �4Z.0.f324 �� r4z5 i44/. �:��: :� - L �.. : !¢G�_ 4' - --^�."_"R � - .:, .,t �• ,,. z -� R IC E .. � �, �� z�c��+s �a�a �•o,� —=. a� � ; • _ �_r ;,e; ; . , � Y,ILGT+JN LED�. � � �, y � `�, �Zof- .:::�, � 4' .r-'—'�T- ,• e ,f� . + r4'o • _; /'�: ' t- , . (��'j� ' - ' 6ZE3 ;�� \ '1370 l�-2p' � .�'2�� .1 . J_ Y + � . :._ _. _ .� l5° ' _ w. J_;\, �. . Y/C-B�� K -. I /,'J/ �r ��.,a> �, ' ,�,F � bze3 � � . _ . . - .'1 ��" �,�.: < '^ '. Z.�c% _ �fGe>i Z . v ; -,� � -.- n (6 f . �„� w � � r - - . � 61-71 ? � " � �:< : bZ74- Z _ ,-.. l ; � : ' G�45 f� '- c �� Y ~. � ,�.��"�s;�i ; �` 6 �75 � � ;� '' - �.,_:e r � '�. S �.; �,. -J ` . ' ��. - �' � : •e..o•, "� , . . � E ,� .. � ; .. . r£ <..a;- jiy � � @ � �" �: — ;0 6zFq i` f�� .T%' ��&�e� OR�'�E _ . . o, ,_ t�ro �G � ° a �� 4. _ �li.� /�1�1�.� �� ' �MO � �b�5� 6zF� 4 ��- . �_.. . . _ ..G�� 9 = P4 S � �� :- , � _ '4 � b z !7 ,.a. _ l _ +r5,�,�a :�� ,�, � `�44 �f_ p *aG j �`�� . ' -t�Y R�F�e K L� � • �F-- s4 ZO ;�' /:�¢� � � ,�_ . _ SuB. i � z R ,; �i � � � __.._____._ 1 B � �2UOp� .. . � .- . � � �6� v �--"- ._ ._oY 'a \Z �' hL bp � �` i " . � Sw ec�ec? _ . Ca J%+� .16 � . " ' • . . . � ( . ` -..-�.1`rjt�lr ,<�P n�e�,,.e - {�j . l%5 �I 4 ✓�H'I r �1'i° �1'�1. . � . _ . o r r �3 a....� l�" . ` � . t . c� �t � 4 � �"� � . - � ��.�t��:. ; /�ror �E.C�� t4�°`�ti �o < ; . - . � ,Y�:.. t ,.1 g �,X y • �. C3 L7..-, -- � / ` . '� �oG� ,"`, �40b s �: u:�f "; < 4p ' ' 7___3 �1��`� � lLLS6 � r� ;�� ; �51� `� , ,�h,7 ; ' � 6 �a/� � �ic �.�... .. ' '.. 5� � .6;33 I�.13t i iri.� . � i�,.�oi. a . .�6«..L1Go :: �� .� . . es .� . r�f9 6 .. _ �. , �P _ / /� y. .�..r /'r.i.'.sr �'y ' Z �: � - �ey � `i �d � la�I'r � r . _ ` Ej} z° t' . -. , '6R7 6l25 ' e �-AI J�. (aoo; 6l3Z ,+��. � �, . ,, � E / : :i 6,750 �.:_ e zs� d � � 3 1� .� .c`� 5€'/OOQ'( t_"'`�_ �.:t- , G/ � � .;'zr��J �'' s `, � �z'' .. :`i r� sF r. `�- . 7 l5�r.o � . -r �o- . _ � � �'t �;�H i �, hL 'h �. ` „ q 2 �. e: -e5 o � �l16 ;`� � � ` ': #`� --`-' � - � Go4S f� � ' � �� . ' \ � . � J ' '`r .S o � . � t i: `"rF� ( o . . s .._ SS�' � s��-. �. � ,,4.-�` t �� 2� . U � . E�.�. �(�i✓o.r> S//�' Q"(h'�ly�R -��-- < ='° . �i . , S9L.,.��.� ��, ., �� . .___.a: :.�... �—�. , �, '�� '� �; �%�� 3Rfl ��`�, `, .u. ,� _ � . . ._ .. � _ _ �_ __ ._ �. _ . _ �: �. . .;.�;.��,.:� . ,� � . . �. � _, (� � CI�i l f3r 1-�dZ�+)!.. =Y� . '%� � [.�lCl'I Un11V;lR Ii'Y FVi: 1 C. �� f:-0If)tJ�Y.IJIN i - t:tl[ �.��;7'7-:a,�:,o n�n��s: �C i PLA�d;lING COt4�1ISSI0ll: API'ftU'1eD_ C1TY COUNCIL: PARY. FEE REQUT.RF.D: S7IPULATIOP�S: � PROPEKTY 04ti.EP,(S ADflRESS(ES APPRO'JED �1 . n�/wvY..�'wl�iciS�M aMN��aW�Y�fu¢Y W��M.PMYYW.MJwYaelRVre'lsh�W.�'.YPw`W�1MJifa'/M�V'�-. , 3',13J1:C7 �� LG7 Sf'L IT LS li�,C�!!H� ,,� D�'--'' ' �ECOa��r_n: ------ _. %/-[ �,c-�'t DA7E: DISAPPRJVED _ DATE � - -� -� —�'/ NO_�L __ DISAPPROVED DAT[ _ �a�_ AP�DU1aT � 2 � /` �1�� iUPd rr PROPLRTY LOCA?I01� QN STREET L[6AL D�SCRIPT,'.ON OF PROPERTY % PAID �. v FE[ �� -' R[CEIPT f�0 o2IG' � 7ELEPHOh'E P�0 .5�� 77� Z TELEPHONE P70 �' C= . . T07AL At;Efl 0� FROPERTY PRESFfdT ZOP;Tf�G__ ,v� " / ?Pc: 6G- ��cr �Gt� , , RcASO;� FOR LOT SPLIT � /(l �!` '�e'P`✓ ,�'` /�� f . � ��— Sj�„Cc VG The undersigned herehy declares ti�aC all ti�e facts and represe e,pplii:ation are t.r�ue and co��rec�. � / � i st�r;a��ti,zE DAT[:_ Ji C '��, f. 1 I? t.�ll S P�07IC[: A skr_i:ch of the {?rcpertY �,nd the pi�oposed lot spl i t wi th any exi sting stl�uc- __,_ tures shoarn shoulr accoinpany ihis aE,plica*ion. (Sc�e rev��i'sc sida fo�• Zdditinnal instructionsj a • T9d1 POLICY STAT[P1ENT ON PARK FEES , 32 ON LP�ND SULDIVISION Date In determininq fair market vatue of public area5 for land subdivision for cash payment, as required by Ordinance 633, the follo�ving values v�ill be used: Residential subdivision b1,000.00 per lot Residential lot.split � 500.00 per lot Commercial/Industrial subdivision or lot splits $ 0.015 per sq. ft. This fee is to be paid at the time of final plat or lot split approval. The City Council may defer collection to the time a building permit is requested for individual lots created by such subdivision/lot split. The City retains the option to accept an equivalent amount in cash from the applicant for part or all of the portion required to be dedicated. PARK FEE AGREEMENT The undersigned understands that according to the City Platting Ordinance, the following public park land dedication is required to plat residential, commercial or industrial zoned property. It is further understood that the public park land dedication or cash payment equivalent is at the discretion of the City. It is agreed that a cash payment of $ wi11 be paid according tc the above stated policy for the following subdivision/lot split. It is agreed that the following land dedication is provided according to the above stated policy for the following subdivision/lot split: Dedication: Subdivision/lot split: The undersigned further ayrees to notify all future property owners or assigns of the cash payn.��t reqtiirement, if it is ta be collected at tlie tiine of buiiding permit. DATE oo�ani�o�;�n SIGNATURE Property Owner / ♦ � LOON P�V�DS 8 � i � � 9�{INE .. ... ..... . ,� �...`�r.v . '��. � i.'�x.� ' 33 j,��,�►'Tt ON \ SPflING L1[E V�NR� . 35 -� - n Ll t. n u i�!i �,uu �/ A�idCro:vs 6�.. � � m�� 1.1'i{�_'.� g.:_ 4f�. : r ��r . �I �� a .�,li�.i.l..� _ (i s�j � :°I� �IL..\ `:Y � b �� u. .a I e � im `' ��i �\ ,�I �� N 1 - N I L 1' �S � 1� � !il11�� S �� I. .,;:.... < - 4 ,� `F � it-, � < "� �� { ' � j� � 1 ' .., tt;',e. I i t� �< I� i a I� � �2 i ', i k �t i Ii � �� I �NJF� CP IF�.;.:�J._••1�-.`�� :iLwiIIN CD. - w,.a+=ais 4'4 3 L�n �•i f O 3 �� 4.� •; � a e� �1�``�s �� = �r- � `��7,C,". a} "e� , ,...� �.. °...� c, jr^,��-n�',3�� I, COLIIY&1 ; : HEIGNT$ STR[ET PdAP-CIiY OF / � � � � � � 0 $333 6,6�8 �. , � -. ' —�..^.-°�*,+.,, /' �� ) i/ � LH�nrc�� +1� �re >S � 3 2 I 7 � 1 d � Ij �' � 1 iF � '`" '`<' � Ei� '' 'ADAIT�ON ' ( o) �-� � �' - Y 6dc �a �- � ' � � �� I � 5 n i� � ia/l.��.�.y.ry' B � /O zo z� � ,� _ . c:r.-. _7 i f�os) ,r Bw A � �f .� ��V. ��s / . �.!' �$ � •C/iY OF FR/OLEY CO � s--esseQ�-r,T . �: -Geaer�r----�oae--F,: �`.._ 3- .. .. p�[' ^ 1'I't p .. t � 1. �IViL.-QV��sCi�1Y6(��rf��Il��. . . . ��20� �60) �/J) �- I yr��l� i � 4�Y�'-v-�-a1}.+aj, �.+' �i.� � � • 3 A DERSOII� � i< «, =.,z � �, zo �„ � ,J � ,, : H_, � �.�� ; _... � � •,. �. t .�., . . �; zs�<,�! DRIVE `_v� __'_ Gm) � ,.�. ` - ::. „ .. �. 4 � zf E�/3 E�/•1. dy �`� ro 9 5'r .. Rla9� �LIOI �aT � 1'��ir M S f '• I. 21 �yi �.. �. 1 Oi/6 �/9 L'20 Z•. 28 0 ,:y.�sa� -''�,•C?';1} y�"1�,+ DEVELOPMENT a 'S 'B�' '`' :z_�' ;;�. ;,., a z, . � ` �� . � ,: ,,.< ..J � 3� •,.�.iF y ��''-..�'�' ;: ,. ,.:�_. . ^`__ _ .w .. 4d w � • ^_�--'�--...�-.�5-i+t— mEn��. h ew ��e a� i�3 z�: a..�.J �� iO� , •MGAOOIi�A�OtR ' � � � � li.. Ml�r. ( W iZ- i!�'-- .. .i�.. . - _ pey .. _` ' 1wr /Y✓/�.k- ) '�- p " � �a ;!.. /Y r $� �� 1 9f ,} � - �Y . 'D�UN S � ? �JTW"y : u �� rIt,•� / o '� �e }' � 1.'�:: _�G�� -pi 4 l2 `f f `�Y.1�.`x �, • � > � /e 's x . � r J �, . f aie•J l [� a —�� '--� ^ `_._--=..__r � y � . � r,w �, a.,r � �, �a ri:....`. �! I Y� `�; --- � f- rl � � � I /Y __.._ I � ;i ;;;: � CENTRAL ' 2nd ' 3 a s � ] e � ( 7�3 I/2 FvE. R.E. � � 3 fyS�s�T�j6�/� i /lf1�/ .�:.w60wirN4 /w'06r�/ w� : �. y N� �� :� �, t� . . .-• . . *, , �. �.a��r� 14nw � I�• y_ ? � �; - - J� �.:! ,._.g�— ' , .� CRNE ._,\ .�, ¢ �a a �' 3' i � r , ". iflM(iE �-t5, Oh �' ; z �.9t:c; . z ..W � !%ALNUT r� ; � a s _� �. _ , � Y�-; °AODIT/0�'�;,, . ;;, �, � F17 i ::,0 .�, „ , .a I F4 .. . � � � i N�' �. �� ` ." ' ` I ' 1 `�� a .. , I . n � �"' ,d �.w �' �n � � �P�2� i : '.i _ I •-R 1-.��+�..w,�„�a�_. . ° .. �-�C.OIIN.Y-STATEAIQ hicHN�,: �� ,....,.,,�.. �--.�-rF a �.-�!�e:� ..,..,,r,.,,...,z�.r..s.,.,-....2...�..e.�...�.t.i�a-m.-�P°.'r��+'^;`+e'""'^'.+-±ne!+�.r+�s�crsv�nvr;.e."w�+F'"7qC±'^""'�.TV'M1'a'?r'T.........' " { . t . . �35 � � ��d�� Ro. � , � .� � - --..�. �l �� ; . , , - . � � � . , i ; , . EX1s7yni� cANo�� BL RG. 60� - � ' � s_� � ? �'�°� ��;'; . _,, p„ � � �� %�� 7�� _ - ' - � t . _ . _ i a�,rdq��e � . .. ` ' B R rea ! . . . � ' . ' • . h ' . _ . .. _ . �� \� . ' . . .. � . � e �� t�r�JX�t i uR� `� . . � � ' GoLF `o �� . �� .. : � _ . . .. .:. � ,o°� _ � .. . _ . � . ` . ; ._ . �. . . � - �. : . � . . - � . � . `.• � .: �_ 4C: � _ � � _ � � �. � - ; � , -. . . . . � . . � � . • ��r� 50, . - , . j� � . _ , _ . # o _ . �. : � . J � . . . _ : �' � , r . , . . , .. . � ' � � i ` . . _ . . ' � . ; _ ::; � ��. : . � �' CITY OF fRIDLEY ' ; s �: . ENERGY COMMISSIUN ' MEfTING JANUARY 27, 1481 CAkL TQ ORUER: E4h��rperSon Wharton catted the January 27, 1981, fr�ergy Comnission meeting to t�rder at 7:35 p.m. ROL�CALL; - Memb��^s Present: Bi1l Wharton, Dean Saba, Don Wa11, Giles McConville ��" ;�s�ent: Jerry Ci cfiosz O�h�rs Present: Mary Cdyan, Numan Services Assi;St�at Cormie Nletcalf, SORT ,�:2'ION &Y MR. WA:I.L. SECC)11Tt?ED BY MR. SABA, TO APiaR{�VE T6Ts DEC. 16, 1980, ENERGY � 1:(�MISSION 1�IiVFITES. � 1�ir: Wa11 stated ihat on page 4, paragraph 7, shotaTd he changed to read as folic�rts: "Mr. Wall stated they should not get sa'restricted that they do not , ��k ��-dir�ct surface photo vottaic solar and i't� such as power towers.° � UPf?N A VOIGB VRT$r: ALL VQTT2V�G RYEr CH.iIRPERSON. Wf7�1I2'!l7N:. DECLARED TAE MINUTES AP�'�V871 ��AS��AMENDED. �. � � � � . . 1. -MEE7'IN6 WITH GARBRGE HAULERS - Co�nie Metcalf of SORT l�lss.;i��ed�f:stated she had contacted about 14-18 different haulers, and many ��#�"�r��'icated they would come to the meeting; however, only Larry Saba a�t3 �..�talter came to the meeting. At�� qeei9;ng, the haulers indicated that one tt't�k can service 250 homes in W�ter�, t25 in spring. Spring is their worst s�a�n; and they wouid like to haye the leaves removed by some other method. Ms,:Afeica}f stated leaf compostinq t�as intro�uced by the Environmental Quality Lsa�missit� about 1972-1974 as a pc�s�ibi#1ty and has now come up_..again with recycti�fg. She woutd like to ir�traduce it again as � possibility for the City. Back fn t972, the City considered it and ��ded..they did not have the equipment to do alt-the mechanical procedures �e�sary far composting. Sqe stated it has been-sugge�ted that the County has �y�nery and could do the turning of the com�ost. If some arrangement could be i�� fqr these yard wastes to be collected and d�mped at a site, then it is h#�1� �s5ible the County would service tne ctunpost. Fhis is what has happened i.1��}�in:Caunty. The compost is then used 6y �ard�ners and residents of �i`�liS, : Ef$ERGY GOMhtISSION MEETIN�, �ANUAf�Y 27, 1981 PA6E 2 Ms. MeteaTf stated that one af the haulers st�ted that Btaine and Rosevitle have city spring slean-ups. She also knew Spring Laice Park has a clean-up day. Boxes are_ set out and residents bring their discards and dump Yhem in the'boxes. Haulers �hen haut this away or separate out what is recyclable. Gc�ad Wi11 also participates in this and wattts to get as much as they can of recyclable materials. This viould certainly be a gdod idea and would give the residents a shance to get rid of things. Ms: P9etca'if stated that, as far as recycting, the haulers had stated-that it takes too many man fiours and is not worth it to separate recycl'ables in their weekly operations. Larry`5aba mentioned a recycler in Mankato, and he is also intere�ted in reeycling. She stated she would talk to Mr. Saba more about a curb-side pick-up kind of proyram. She hoped`to do a survey to find out how many residents in a given- restr3cied area woul:d be:interested in curb-side pick-up of recyclabies, and residents wouTd separate materials. Mr. 5aba,stated one big problem with setting �arbage out on the'eurb is vandalism. Ms. Metcal.f stated that St, Paul is recycling in all neighborhoods. Si. Paut now has a city subsitlized program in the amount of $80,000 for recycling and pick-up. ,she stated she would tatk to Jo Nelson, who is in charge af Recycling Unlimited in St. Paul, to see if vandalism is much of a problem ther�. hfs. Metealf stated StiRT would also like the differentiation of charges for one, t�o, or three garbage cans, because many people are recycling or have no chi}dren and their trash has greatly decreased. Ii bothers some people to pay far the equivalent of three cans, because hau<lers charge the same whether there is one, two, or three cans. 54RT was suggesting a charge based on the nurr�er of cans. Mr.=4talter had stated that it was too di€ficult to charge for one, twe, or three cans. The "no-can" limit was easier for bilTing, and Mr. Wa7te� stated it costs him 75¢ to send'out a bi11. He is now &illing'thirdiy rather than quarterly. She felt this was Mr, WalteNs point'of view, as there are other haulers who do charge this way. Ms: Metcalf stated sbe felt eomposting was the most practical thing for the City : to do. Tfiey are not cormnitted to help the haulers, but they are charged by i�tropolitan Council to reduee tqe amount of tra�h gaing to the landfills. She felt this could aTso encou�age recycling: _ hfs. Metcatf stated she was also suggesting that:possibly the City couid be d9vided into districts (Minaeapotis does-this) so there would be more efficient hauling in the City. Mr. Wharton stated dividing the City into districts w¢uld be very di-fficult to. do, Everybody should have:the ri-ght to ;choose the hauler they wanL. Mr, Saba stated the idea was nice, but because pf the a6use where one person has a mcmapoly, there cauld be st� real'problems. ; .�� i�Sk'. �#£RfY COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 27, 1981 PAGE 3 Mr:`MtConvilie stated if they enuld institute•certa�n things that effectively rec�icie--leaves, botties, cans--which would reduce the amount of garbage the haulers have to ha�1, the pressure to raise the p�a�es.would ]evel off. There #s'a positive effect there:, Mr. Wda.l stated that, in terms of recycling, he tk�stlght the Energy Comnission's " thc>ughts were centered on the cost of new aluminurr[ versus the cost of recycled - afivatinum, also gTass and newspaper. The amount of.�nergy requi.red to make 'those #inished:products from raw materials is cori�iderably less than from r2�ycled•materials. For his part, he would like tn eancentrate on those three pr4ducts where there was same chance of making sotne�#ring happen. He stated he _ is sympathetic wit#� the leaf program, but he did not know how they could do a =- ' lot with th�t from an eneMgy standpoint. Mr. �tc�o�r�il'le recammended they take note of the pasit�ve affects of leaf hauling ; �qd composting and pass tkiis on for consideration by tfie Environmenta7 Quality ��SS3Ai}. r Mr. Wha►�on stated ha agreed tfiat recycling was d€finitely going to be a big energy saver with these specific products. He stated he never throws newspapers aut, because there are always Boy Scouts who come around to pick them up on a regn7ar basis. Nis;.questiort was how do they go about educating peopie to save , �.<��.- their cans and battles the same way they save newspapers? k}s. Metcalf,stated that eqery pop dispensing machine should have a barrel next �, .., , ta:3t far a�.�tcir��m cans. �- s.. Mr. hk,Csurvilte stated the key to recycling is regular col7ection. Peopte may ster� saying,tiotfiles, but when they get 500 lbs. of bottles sitting around, tir�t,�t�� t�� the end �f th�i r�� recycl i ng. � kls. Metcatf stated that if she could get any &ind of pick-up program going, she wou18 like the support of the Energy Cortrnission'in that kind of effort. She would like to pursue gettang-some kind of m rb-side piek-up of recyclables in a certai�l.area, She may be able to get a graat for ti�is from the Po7lution Control �Y- 6�^.. �#�an thanked Ms. MetcaTf for coming io the meeting and for keeping the E�e�� 41�mtission informed: �. ZONING CODE, DISCUSSION AND DEFINITIONS: M5.'Cayan stated the Commission members had recei�d the most recent version of the Zt>ning Code. Everything marked in red in #he dc�cument indicated suggestions �e �iy the Energy Cortunission and supported by tMe:City Attorney as being work- , :�}� iq tMe Zoning Code. ��..�ay��t stated that at the last meeting, Mr. Baar�aq:had asked the Energy �#ssi�n.to cct�e up with a definition for "Alterna�e Energy Systems. At that m�e��; ��he Commission hasl suggested "non-fossit i`i�'F energy devices° as a pu�ss��fi�sitioA. � � � � tlER6Y GOMMISSION P��TING. JRNURRY 2 PAG Ms. Cayan stated Mr. Boardman had also said he would like tt�e Commission to come up with a definition of what wou7d be workable as part of the major building design in terms of solar energy devices. 7he Coran'rssifln �mbers agrr;ed to define "Alternate Energy Devices° asr "non- fnssit;fuel energy devices". Mr: Wharton stated tfiat in the iast meeting's minutes, Mr. Boardman had added an Item #2-F under`2�5.045 Accessory Buildings;and Structures, which stated: "Solar energy devices not part of the major siructure design". Mr: Wharton ►^eferred ta the definition of "Accessory Use or Structure" on paqe l,which stated: "A subordinate buiiding or use which is located on ihe same lot on which the main building or use is situated and is reasonably necessary and inciaental to the conduct of'�he primary use of such building pr ma#n use." Mr. Wharton stated that definition seemed to say a1T that was needed, and why add anything to that definit9an?' He stated he did not quite understand why Mr, Boardman had added #2-F under 205.045, and he would like to ta3k to Air. Boardman before going any further with it: In talking about th� integral part of the princi'ple structure, Mr. Wall suggested the fot]owing,definition: "in i�eneral conformity to the principle structure ir� terms of #raming, finisi�ing, and:overall'shape". He stated it is going to be a judgement eali, whatever definition is used. The real issue is: What about tfi� things'people are hang�ng on their houses that he knows he would not want the f M' h � ; acrass- street rom is ouse_ Mr. Wharton stated he did not think the Commisston was necessarily obligated to try to define what it means ta have a solar structure attached to a building. 'fhe reason he was having so many problems with it was why do they need to Jefine a-sotar structure any differently tfian an attaehed garage vs a'detaehed garage, a greenhouse, etc.? The Coamission members agreed to recanmend Mr: Wall's definitian for what would be aitowable as part af the major building design in terms of solar energy devices: "An alternate energy device'in general conformity to the principle structure in terms'of #raming, fi:nishing, and overa7t shape." ; Ms. Cayan stated she thought the Comnission was probably almost to the point of reca�nding their ehanges in the Zoning Code on to ihe Pianning Comnission. Mr. Wharton siated there should be a definition`for "Solar Energy Device" as , that is rne�tioned often in the Zoning Code. Ne stated the Energy Comnission had defined this earlier. , Ms. Cayap stated thaL roust have been an oversight and sfiould be inclUded in the definitians in _the Zon�ng Co4e. Mr: Saba �tated fie would like ta'have a}1 the definitions written into the Tnning Code so they woald have a document complete with a11 recommended changes Lhey can vote on to recommend to Planning Commission and City Gouncil. .. £ .Y�'��u .:.. . . . . ENERGY C4MP4ISSION MEETING, JANUARY 27, 1981 PAGE 5 Mr., Wharton stated they wauld continue this item until the next meeting. He ' weuld like the Comn#ssion members to reuiew the dotnrtent one more time for ' ;, ,�ecommended changes and they should also refer to Mr. David Newman's memo of D2c: lb, 1980. - 3, ENER6Y GUMMISSION 6UIDELIN£S A�D ENERGY COMMISSION GOALS:FOR 198] - � ISC Si : ' Ms.-Caya� stated she had reviewed a11 the Comnission's: past minutes and had written down sane things dis�t�ssed by the Comqission that she thought were s�me possible goals for 1981. Mr. Sa6a staY�tf he thought ihe Gity Council would like to have the Energy Caamias3� �ook at other city ordinances, especially the Maintenance Code ktiEh`re5{�act tn energy. Ne wout�# also like to see the Energy Commission review tite ,Cc�tpr�ei�s'ive, PTan with respect ta energy conseruation. Mr. Whartfln stated that Ge€ore the Comnission could talk about the Comprehensive Rl�n as an'objective, they would need to have someone from staff talk to them abaut it. s��-. .Mr. SaBa stated they had }ooked at the State Ordinane� on lighting at the last '° " meetin�.��nd rrtaybe that is something the.Camnission would want to"7ook at for the G�t�.� � � � � � ,,,, '� ��; ��, Sat��rsred to the fnergy Commission 6uideTines'(du}y 21, 1980), FV-A-1, which s#.�#edc "Develop energy efficient criteria-retating to City purchases." _ this r�as an area tk�ey cnuld 3ook at in terms of goals. Mr.;Wall Stated he feTt it w4uld be worthwfiile for the Comrnission to meet with City SLaff--ope�^ating peaple, operating managers--and ta9k about these goals . and measures to see if, tagether, they can't come. up with something that makes sense fi^�r! the standpoint of guidelines or goals. What is the City doing? What ��siderations can be given to every seg�ent af city government? Where cd�t�y have the largest or most effective impaet? � TRr. WMarton asked if it wouTd be appropriate ta� invite different department heads tn come to individuat �etings to speak to the Gommission. 'FFre Coamfssion �rr�ers thaught this was a very gaqd idea. �-��. Cayart stated she would caritact someone from staff to come to the next Energy � Com�issi6n meeting.' � 1�¢��ta.7t stated he thought the City could provide places ior car parking for I ��s of people for, not necessarily ride sharing,� but public transportatinn. � �es a lot of traveling, and he sees signs tfiat;sa�, "This space reserved E f�.•�c�ter<parking". Maybe this could be a Cotam�s.sitm goal for the City. _ � I _ . .�. . SS 1�. ,IANUARY 2 Mr. Wharton stated that AVTI slide shows could be sorrething don� in conjunction witfi the next Energy Feir;; MY'. Saba suggested that th� AVTI slides be made availabte to- the pubjic in ihe library. Mr. Whartan suggested that Ms, Cayan contact the Depar�tment of Educatipn and/or Anoka AVTI to get informatiot� an how the Energy Comnission could purchase these slide shows. The possibte goals suggested by the Commission: 1. Review of City Ftaintenance Code (and other city ordinances with respect to ener9Y� 2. Review of Gomprehensive Plan with respect to energy conservation 3. Light9ng 4. Gomnttter parking �reas ': 5. AVTI slide shows ` 5. fNDUSTRIAL'& COMMERCIAL GOOR�INATION - DISCUSSION: Mr: Wall'stated t1�e rea} i5sue is what can they ar what should they do in the industrial and commercial_�eetor?' It comes back to a direct coordinatian funciion with industry, alrpost at-the calling of the-Mayor. When the Energy Comnission had met with:the City Louncil members, he did not feel the City Ccsuncii was very excited a�out g�tting into the private sector or non-governmenta} sector. He stated he work,5 with-�11 industr3es, and he is seeing so much being dane in energy savings bec�use of rising'fue7 prices. De-regulation will do , wonders for industry in the area of energy conservation. Mr. Wharton stated maybe the best thing the Camnission could do is to have the Ci'ty set a gaod exampte fo�^ industry. Mr.'Wa17 stated that urtless they can go at it in a big way with the sanction of the City to bring pevpl� together, then they probably shouTd not pursue this issue.' He agreed with Mr. Wharton, that the City should set an exampie. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. SABA; SECONDED BY 1�2, McCONYILLS, TO ADJOURN TIiE i�tEETTNG. UPON i9 VDZC$ UQTE, ALL VOTTiYG AYE� CHAIRPERSON N7fARTON DECLARED THE JAN. 27� I98.I, SN$RGY COMMIS5ION MEErZNG'AIIJOUP�N�'D AT 9:36 P.M. Respectfully submiLted, d..��c .�i�� Lynrie Saba, Recording �ecretary �� `. �: �rg � x'�. y$/ �F*T': ' . . . . . _ .. , r+- ,�'' . }h{''�.kvr'Nnv 4r � � s� p'• ' . g � '�.� � ��L �� . `�{: r . G � � C�� j�F� ��'t ., �t�l 3.P' : _ . � � �� 1 �s.j�.,te- . . � ''�,1i.. . . . {, ��, _ " �TY OF fRI�Ot.�'Y ;,' d „ < ' �i��?VPl RESOURC[�ES{ GtN�AI � � X �G'i� C ��= ' "� Ff6RUARY 5. 13Q1 ' � t . �.*{ { : v'L. �f . . . . � . ., i iC ' �. f .. � � .- �> �, t � � ��^• ... . . .. . . � .. �i.�ssin:-'CrB�s+fels ca7.le� the February 5, 1�tfi�~�=3�an Resources Gomnission ��:i�}{,'�.�r` at 7:35 p.m. �' pb�s,t�e�se�t: �ter Treuenfels, Mary;vaR Dan, Ja�ne Noble , I�,�'�t: k�e Wetch, Wyme Saunders ��a��rrt: (?�'°�ayan, H�an Serviees Speclalist tt�, �gtaert Ba�ner, Fam�iy'Life Eert�er Foundation i�_ . Lucy Mickmar►,' Family Life G�C�r f�nt[ation ` Tom.l$Yt�'"a. U'rrector of Gornniutti�� Sc�ools �� i �i#ary .,t�rti+�, . Garm�nity Schovls A+�V°isary Gounci 1 Y 15,.14Q1, Hti�AN RESQt)R�. :�S 6N MINUTES: �:�. � � �t` lY8'. Y�ilN ZTi�Nr SElJ�NDSD BY MSi. NOBLB� '1Yi:1l�+PRAR$ TNE JAN. 15� 1981� . �!� .�LFSS20P' � ltlN(T'ISS: Au^ i1rRZTT$l�f. � {�E si! �� t�TE r`.�1LL VOTING AY,E • CHASRBERSt1di T��'LS DECLARSD THfi Mf72'T�kT �`��,1�1�. i .�., , , � � .�fy`�)NSEi.i�tG SERVIGE AfiENGY - P1�S��4'i�f'�t�t � � ` �.� � �'B�� t.��d.he is a pspcltiatrist, p#ys#��tr; �ti Director of the FamiTy ��.,' .� T�e_ �a�ily Life �►�r is a��:priaate, ��-Arof�t cosnprehensive� ��'_ tal heatth ce�ter. 'it Gegan;as art t�� in his mind a6out seven ��,L�"was Chief bf MeF+tal Hyg�en,e`tlit^ec#qr of tfie Famf'ly Life ,��Jnited 5tates-�►�y on tt+e isla�td of Qa�t�, Hawaii. He was in o�-�atierrt a�rcV m�ttal health serw�ces f�r a11 the dependents` of ,_ ��:,�t�al Fprces .ia Hawaii, which i�s aboat 2�U•*900 peo�le. He also had ��#��,.t4 -work wftl+ th� State l4ental- lfeaith Repartment of tiawai4 on , ��° bal��, ,�$�r,5t��d•he had long anst exte�isive expt�risnc$ w�ih comnunity mental �hth s��V�+�; a�iC� were w�rehens�ve.put�='pati�at, and he worked in con- ��$� �v�#.� a l�xge A►�p psycftiatric hospitaT. : Qut of that experience; he �t �t��R_p�'#�at� practice fipur years agq �ht�sug�t the Minneapolis Clinie-of ^y��p��#�ur*ctlogy fn'6olden Valley. �F{e trai�d in Rochester, but�it'was � ;; � ;�.. <. , _ � � ,•. , .o. MISSION MEETIb his life-long dream to comeip Minneapolis and become a private pr�ctitioner. After 1� years in private practice working through the Minneapa]is Clinic, he found himself disenchanted with the giving of fee-for-service psychiatriC serVices in the private model. He had worked at Mercy Nospital and Unity Hospital and had iarge psychiatric in-patient supportive staffs t�at had a traditional out-patfent type af fee-for-service private model to work with. The Minneapolis Cli�ic is a vary large, very compleie, excellent clinic that has been around for many years. He stated he considered departing private practice, but mad� the decision to stay in private practice and follow co�nunity mental health. The oniy comprehensive community mental heaiih in this country he was familiar with is the public model owned, organized, and directed by the state and federal governments. Dr. 6aumer stated that from #is experience wtth state co�nunity mental hea7th, he was dissatisfied with working in canmunity mental health in the publie sector. His interest in the private sector is very stror�g. Ne stated there is a lack of ownership in the public sector, and he felt that existed in the pr�vate sector. However, fram his experience in the private sector, he fou�d tMere was a]ack of responsiYeness to the mental hea]th needs'of the identified mentally ill person. The copnnunity certainly owns the problem, beeause the mental1y ill are part of the cormtursity: Ttte governrr�nt eertainly owns the problem and have a responsibilfty to the citizens and the private sector. It intrigued him that somehow the private seetar tias to take some direction, in�tiation, and leadership to the communiLy and to the government. Qr.. Baumer stated;:thaf three years ago (Aug; l, 1978), he set-out.to:create the Family Life Center with assistance from the Minneapolis Ciinic. After one year, 9t was very apparent that this was community mental health, nat fee-for- service, that the family Life Center and the Mfinneapolis Clinic were not the same thing and th�re nesded to be a separation. Sa, on Aug. 1; 1979, the Center began financial autonorryy firom the Minneapo7is Clinic'of Psychiatry-dnd Neurology and has functioned independently since that time. That is when they became a private, non-profit foundatian. Dr. Baumer stated=that the Center is now in its third year, and he is finding that what the Cemter must do'�s deve]op what`is going to be its "capitalization formula". Right now a11 services at the Center are funded by fee-for-service, sa they stili look like a;private practice, They ha�te found Qut that the Center eannot provide cort�trehensive community mental health'and recei've only funds from fee-far-service. The Ceater's purpose<is to pravide servfces to iadividuais and`families who are experiencing difficulties in their present life situations. Dr. Baumer stated the Cerrter is 5ubsidized out of his private:practice and will continue as long as it can, Tite problem now is that the Center stilt has the appearance of a pt�ivate pz�dctice. For example, they do not have a case/social aorker, they do not have the a6ility to get day care people into the Center fivr transporation. They t�ave a 24 hr./7 day a week answering:service, but fhey have no crisis interv�ntion service. They do not yet provide ample enough ser�Vices to a sliding fee scaie-type of people. They need to realTy grow and expand to fulfill their pt-Amise of becoming a community mentaT health center. �� ' . 2 Kgp"' � i:_.,� !ME�TIMfi. f�BR1tJ�i.°� �+^ is �ocated �A � �#� p�ercent o�'itt�i ti�iES� te1eP�►�s;l : seFn approxia�a�e1S : a�e appraxi ma�:l�,: . _..__ ..� , ___..�_. � ��r t�s+e a p�Ychiatristt '�tti (�s�rr�,9 �." �. �.,Ifces�ea consulti�t�,c11�.� ch�t�ic:��, aa�s# a business �a�. �. h�e ,l�is^,e�,�is�rch+�logist, p�rchia��r� � st �r�s��i� • tri� Fr�diey. Tt�e- �os�� ,b�a i� Fr#�p�.�eeive,services �n iwv it�f� �g?.sfi �� tw�,frt�cks frc��-1�1�t;� ��r�� :: x: � � � '; � F� 3 �.s ,"; afessional Buitd��g gaes for services given su�plies. ants si�ce the Center si �;s per month to the i�ptin, Coon Rapids, �s;per month, 45% are g !from Btair�e, 75% are art�urne. Cric nurse practit9o►t�rs, psychologist, a : 3ve a satel)ite office. se practit9oner, ar�d } is Unity Hospital. ?s, one in the office tal in the Comr�erce ��prproaching area��e;��resses, corporations, ��'�nents in th�' �9��n of'monies. There are �t°fstr get�irtg��tV��:��;�'� #ee-for-services (�vhi�ch� � � �a6+tiss comieg tr� ' ��ities themselves which ipro�rams the fi�nt� .: He stated they�; are px�f��es to #t�� foundaiion, St. �ul � , fcr "star.tfr►g-u#�� . ask�ng for a. $3,�6,;Q,.�ti�,g�a�t fran the Ci ty< of �uily l,i.f�: Center. idin9 Proposai. pt+c�SS,.�'#ir. Batuner a�d Ms. M•ickman. �a�y 1 �Ieadl��e €�^ �� praposals. The 6;�4ng.��opos�}s .�t k�%�± �iu�y and August meetings. �� k�e Planning %�i��t#d City Council. By �tctober, :, �ss� rec�mnettrl��►s a�pted by the Gity Council ,�itg�t- �o-r ihe fcllqi��;�r �� She stated� it� is aboui �a ..s, , or�s� fa'� ��3,tly i deadl�tn� �+�eri �he:qioney is actualty; ;, � �' ��`.#�hey hav� a c�ciified pubk'� ,i�'i� �inq on right now which y '-� `�##s-.��b:iMdt�. <. W11en �his is c�tp� ��till send it to tfie `_ ;�18 -�ted a�.�Y�if f��d auc##t �Ck�'�,a�` � everY Year. -" ,_� � -�. �� •. � � . �F�,; � � ; � , , � � � � � � �¢ ;'� ��-trhet��l��^��y: of the �.if�r.:��sr,`,s clients come fr.o�. "�" `'_ .�;�L�d�,�;1�tt��.�re referr+�d by p#�ysicians, scfiouis, area �` e€m��n��Y re�a�i�'��s ��aka County 5�is}" S�rvices), comnunity colleges, ;� , ; � °�"�. ,��# p�}�9�e, � � �., s� t�� - .-J} h.....jl y. - . _ . . -� X= a. S ItARY 5, i981' The Comrnission members than&eci IIr. Baumer far his presentation. Qr. Baumer stated he appreciated this opportunfty to- talk to the Gorrtnission. He stated that if the Comr�iisicn:had any further;questions, they could call him. 2. DISPOSI7ION Of FiN� ARTS REMA`FNING.FlJNDS (Memo dated Fe6. 2, 7981, to t e Human Resoarces Camm�ssiQn from Tom fira and Jdck Kirk) Mr. Np+hra thanked the Comnnssion"for putting them on the agenda. Mr. Myhra reviewed the history of "The Fine Arts Com�tittee" when it was fornied itt the middle 7976's and fui�ded jbintly by C�rmunity Education and the City. He stated the Corrm4ttee pror�ced two plays, 6rought a number of musica7 groups to Fridley, and conducted"a series of art shows and pho�Eography displays. He stated that in 1978, the E�hnic pance Theatre was a huge artistic success. In the 3ate fa71 of T978, the Fine Arts Cormnittee members approached the Community Education Advisory CounciT about helping to rr�ake the 1979 Ethnic Dattce Theatre cortcert a success, He and Mr. Kirk consulted with Darryl Bussler of South St: Paul, who adviser! therti ta tie the Dance Theatre`s appearance in with some sort of comnunity happenit�g whiej� would draw people, From this was born the ariginal Fridley Etknic Day Festival. Mr. N(yhra stated that the Frid7ey Parks & Reereation Department and District 14 Community Education eaeh agreed to contribute $3(l0 to help with the financing. The ethnic event5 were frEe, tMe Dance Theatre brol�e even, so no rtxiney was Carried forward from the E€hnic flay. He stz�ted that for the 1980 Ethnic Day Festival, because o# attrition of inembership, the Fine Arts Comnittee was not able to sponsor it, so the Frid3ey Parks & Recreation Depariment and District 14 Gomiwnity Education as�umed fu}] resporssibility: The.Committee did agree to hetp #inance by advaneing $300 along with like a�unts contributed by the City and Comnunity Education. Admission was charged and $34U was returned to the Fine Arts fund. The Ciiy arrd 5chool,agreed to a11aw the $400 remaining ta be ptaced in an account for,future f�hnic Day financing:: Mr. tQyhra stated tt�ai aft�r the 1980 Ethnic Day event, fran Swansan, Ghairperson of the Fine Rrts Go�mittee, resigned. Since there is, approximately $800 left in the Fine Rrts fund, th� me�sers of the 1981 Ethpic Day commlttee felt it would not be appropriatc tG spend that money wfthout_going back to ihe two bodr�s who originatly cnrttributed the funds. 7he Corcrnunity Educatiurt Advisory Council has agree'd to retease their $400 ta go-to the Ethnfic Day project, and they dre asking fhe tfttman Resources Comnission to also release th2ir $40Q for this project. If tMe Numan Resources Commission agrees to do this, it is their feeling that the.Ethnic Day from now on wil} be setf-supportfng. Ms. Cayan stated sF�e has ta3ked io Mr. Boar�nan about this. He stated that if the Commission wants to turn tMe money over, they shauld make this recomnenda- tion fo the City ,COUnc17, and 9t would go cm tfie Feb. 23 City Gfloncil agenda.. HOTIINJ BY MS. VAN DAN� SSCENJDED BY MS. NOBLE, TO RECOMMEND TO CTTY COUNCIL THAT THE FUNAS PRESENTLY TN THE FINS ARTS ACGOUN2' (APPbtC1,�IMATELY $900J 8E TRANSFERRED TO TX$ FRIDLEY CST.S'BRATIt�' OF NATIONS ACCOUNT. UPbN A VOICE VOTS, a4LL YQT;x'A�C RYE, CHAIRPSRSON TRE(JEI�t'FBES DECEAIPED THS MOTION CARRI&D UNANIl�I(NJSiY, �; ,_ ;� #��'F,�y,,,IN _ ; ..�-.�,,.R.,.. �Nt;��'at� t� affi,�at� -k Mc !�O G• �3... e�.. If4 .> , -�� .� .�: . ESI�JARY 5, ��-` ; ioe Ad+rt�`� tin� is th,�t i� ��s people wi th � �i� e�woutd ias#� :il met and discussed +ouncil in fine arts: ;hang tfiat should be done again, they; ought rd interests to give �ld :like to fnvite.one-4r bvo people to speak to` ve ac#ion. not think it was �lre role of this_eort�nissiorr to t� them. Shestated a 3ot of time is spent listening could be uaed.a[are prcd+.�ctively. She'stated the nd n@t to listen. She stated-the:Cfiarter Co�inission �+am pn affi�ative:aC��atr. At this point, she would teat urttil the Charter G�aAttssion has made its � and tMen tfie: �i.ss9:ot� c�u7d review those ' d that as far as thfs"Af�#�ative Action Program, pliance. Y�n ax �ss. 1�piar.sx �� n:rscussroiv ox arr�zx�trst� SY. 'PG 7fIF8� CIiAIRPP�fA� �ME?8LS' �;C`L1lRED TH8 MOTSON k `� '� .. . . . . � . "� �.� `�� =�t�d that, as 'the Gommission k►�ew, �he United Yations announced � Ev �nation:�� Y�ar t�f Disabled Persons. Thfs fincludes the mentally ili, ,��Capped, �awtiortal1y Manditappeti,.al�4ho.Jics, and drug dependent „hi r 4 �. . ' � . . � . . . { � y � , . � , . . . . . . -� �� Stated fi�a�yo� Nee had appointed'her as ]iaison person for the City 't�� •�. ;$� �ti1S Y'ECC3Y2d d lot of infiorma#iqn on suggeated programs #hat f � �+ e�.�ca�rYy= v�- i� tia� �ommuni�y. She stated sar� c�nmunities have been ' t , �lt�ait►�e ear�y in the year., have bees tt�!e-ti°ng atonthly, and already hade > �ae�� sei up. The-prnj�cts can range €t^� at3 evaluation of programs �. �-e�;t�►`€ty %r tlae df:sahled to setting t�r.an°ettlhic dance for the disab�ed. �, '�t;yYat�#kit�_:stated�she watkld ifk� to ask t�� tl�e Co�ission establish a project t�giilN��6�e;ttlia� w� invoi�re� the:entire c��,+��; �'Me comnittee, to be° reCOg- `� #��c��.�he i�.S. �9u�cit, ewst invo}ve puGli� �nd p�#vate, 50% of the members J�� be d�5abisd, This camnittee couid--estabiisti-on�`or`two goals to really r a�G�Wi'��h'an,� be ab3s to present to ihe tJ.S. Ca�rncil as something the City of �� haS.ttevelp$ed far the disabled with�n its owrl community. She stated � ,�� ttiink fihe Caaxaission, as a group, wouid w�nt to determine what to do; �� ct �it�e `shouT�i determine this. . �.. ,�� .= � ` HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 5 1981 PAf�E 4 Ms. van Dan stated she feTt the first step is to set a day for the meeting, and it was her suggestion to try to meet in May. Tfiis would give the committee 4-5 montMs to work on a project. She stated it is her role to organize and chair the first meeting, and after the group has met, to continue to act as liaison person between the U.S.' Councit, the Human Resources Gotranissian, and th.e project cortmiitee. PA71'ION BY MS. NDBLEr SECONI�D BY MS. VAN DAA7, TO ESTRBLZSH A PROJECl' COMMITTEE FOR TBS INT'ERNATSONAL YEAR OF DISABLED PER50NS T0 WORK OA1 A COMMUNZ'TY PARTNERSHIP PROGRAN.' UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VCfTING AYE', CHASRPERSON TREUENF&LS DECLARED TAE MOTION �CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. . . � .. � . .. � . � .. Ms, van Dan stated she wou'fd report her progress afi'the next meeting. 4. REPORT ON MEETENG - MS.NQBLE: Ms. Noble stated she atter�ded a�eting of the Gentral Center for Family Resources on Thursday, Jan. 29. At the meeting, there was a: presentation by a direetor of a pre-natal, past-natal qroup, which is a detailed, involved training procedure. The.Central Center for Fami}y Resources does not have the money to have someone trained to set up this p�rticutar kind of group. Ms. Noble stated it was b►aught'up that there was some problem with the Spring Lake Park school at6ninistr�tion feeling threatened by the Center. They also reviewed their figures and the gigantic waiting tist they Mave. 5. 07HER BUSINESS: Ms. Cayan stated she received a letter this week stating that the Anoka County C.A.P. Agency is starting to do a needs assesstnent of the entire county. Anoka County Social Services just did one, and she did not know why C.A.P. was also doing one. She will be attending a meeting next week to find out what C.A.P. has in mind with this needs assessment. 4ne af the things she wi11 6ring up � at the meeting is the overtap of services. She stated she witl report back to � the Comnission. . - * * * * * * :i Ms, Cayan stated that at the last meeting, the.Commission had requested that she respond to the League of Minnesota Human Rights Gommission's request for information ' a6out the Numan Resoarces Gommission and to ask the Human Rights Commission for � infarmation about its organization. She stated?she had spoken to the treasurer of the League of M9nnesoita Human Rights Cortanission, and they wi11 be'sending out their goats. They also warfted to let the Commission know there is a meeting on Saturday, February 21, at 9:30 a.m. at New Brighton City Mail. 'If anyone is interested, this would be a good opportuni#y:to find out what this Commissiorr is all about. * * * * * * __� � ;; : : 1#�1N RESf1URCES COMMISSTON MEETING, FEBRUARY 5, 1481 PAGE 7 Ms, Cayan stated that on M�nday evening, the C#t�,Caurfcil appointed a new �mber ta;the`G[rmmission: His name is erian 600dspead, a FrTdley High Schooi student. Sfie stated she would like to send him materiats and invite him to the March Gommtssion meeting. 'This would give him a chance to meet the Commissian members - arta observe the meeting before he becomes an official member in April. The Cortmission merr�ers concurred. ADJOURIdMENT: f �7PICkV BY MS. VAN DAN, 5EGONABD BY MS. NOBLE, TO �IJ,TQ7�RN THE MEETSNG. ITPOdV A VOIC6 VOTB, ALL VOTING AYfi, CHAIRPERSON TREUEdFELS �CLARED THE FEBRUARY 5� Z981, �NAN RESOURCBS COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNSD AT'20:36 P.M. Respect#uily submitted, ` w nn Saba Recording Secretary :, . �� : � � �� : � � i; s � ;. ,w �� . � � - � � -- � _ ; �I' , 4 �, �� , ;� � CITY Of FRIDLEY COI�TIUN3TY DEVELOPMENT COt�9iSSI0N MEETING FEBRUARY 10, 1981 � CALL TO ORDER: C#►airperson Oquist called the February 10, 1981, Community Development Co�unission meeting t'o order at 7:35 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Presents LeRoy Oquist, Connie Modig, A1 Gabel, Kenneth Vos, Sharon Gustafson Mcmbers Absent: Others 4resent: None Bill Deblon, Associate Planner APPROVAI OF JANUARY 13, 1981, COMMtlNITY DEVEIOPM€NT COMFiISSION MINUTES: �MOTZON BY MS. MODIG, SEC4NDED BY MR. GABEL� T0::1lPPRC�VE THE JAN. 13� 1981� CQMMUNITY.DfiVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTSS AS WRITTh'N.�� iJPOTl A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPER50N OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � 1. COKTINUED: CONDO CONVERSION LICENSE • MOTION BY MR. GAHEL, SECONDED BY MS. MODIG, TO RECEIVE THfi MEMORANDUM FROM VIRGIL XfiRRICK� CZTY RTTORVEY� TO BILL DEBLON� DATED JAN. 23� 1981� RE: PROPOSED CONVERSION CONA�MINIUM LICENSING ORDINANCE�. UPON R VOICS VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE, CHAIRPERSON OQUIS2'�DECLARED THE MOTION CARRISD UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Oquist stated that Mr. Herrick's letter stated that if the City did have a licensing ordinance, 9t would have to have a public hearing and the ordinance would then be good for 18 months, at which time another public hearing would have to be held. Dr. Vos stated that at tfie public hearing, testimony would have to be received and a recard made to sabstantiate findings of fact that there existed a shortage of rental dwellings available to low and moderate income individua7s or that the conversion would impair the City's eligibility for State and Federal financial assistanee" 6efore the ordinance could be enacted and then it could only be enacted for 18 monihs. �� CQMMUN2FY DEVELQPI�NT COh9MISSIQN MEETING, FEBRUARY 10, 1987 PAGE 2 Dr; Vos referred to Mr, Herrick's third paragraph where Mr. Herrick stated: °It would be rqy opinion that before the City could adopt a proposed ordinance,' a public hearing would have to be held, pursuant to reasonable notice.".. Dr. Vos stated that, as he understood Mr. Herrick's statement, before the City could adopt a proposed ordinance, a public hearing would have to 6e�ield where tiey have to prove there }s a shortage of rental dwel]ings. The ordinance would remain in effect for 18 months, and if the City wished to continue the ordinance, another public hearing would have to be held and the same findings of fact would have to be found to exist. Ms. Modig stated that when so�one comes in to get a license for a beauty shop,that persori does not have to prove there is a shortage of beauty.shops in the_City. That person just comes in, pays the fee, and gets the license. Why couldn't this be done the same way? Pubtic hear9ngs are not required to get other kinds of licenses. She stated the purpose of the license is not to prevent the con- version; it is just so the City is aware of how many conversions there are. Mr. Oquist agreed with.Qr. Vos in the interpretatian of Mr. Herrick's statements. Mr. Oquist stated that if the Commission members were satisfied with the proposed ordinance as amended at their last meeting, he would recommend they pass this attrended ordinance on to Pianning Commission wi�h Mr. Herrick's memo. But, before this goes-on to Pianning Commission, he would like to have Mr. Herrick clarify paragraphs 3 and 4 in his memo. MOTSON BY MS. GUSTAFSON, SECONDED BY DR. VQS, TO RECOMMEND THAT "AN ORDINANCE SSTABLISHING CHAPTER 209 OF FRIDLEY CITY CODE ENTITLED 'CONVERSION�CONDOMINIUM' LICENSTNG" AS AMENDED A1yD MR. HERRICK'S.MEMO DATED JAN. 23, 1981, BE FORWARDED ON TO PLANNING COMMISSSON. THE COMMUNITY DEVELOFMENT COMMISSION WOULD ALSO RfiQUSST TNA'1' BEFORE TXESE TWO ITEMS ARE�PASSED�ON�TO PLANNINC', COMMISSION� 1�II2.��HERRICK BE ASKED TO CLFiR2FY�PARAC,RAPXS 3 AND 4 OF HIS MEMO. � UPON A VOICfi VOTfi, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPSRSON OQUIST DECLARED 2'HE MOTION CARR78D�UNANIMOUSLY. �� 2. INDUSTRIAL REVENUE'BONDING: Mr. Deblon stated the Gomnission members had received a booklet entitled, "City of Fridley, Minnesota, Informationai Packet for Industrial Development Revenue Mortgages and Bonds, Prepared by Marvin C. Brunsell, July 1979". He`stated this 'is fhe Informational Packet that is currently given to a developer who wants to fill out an application for industria] revenue bonding from the City. It contains some policy and guidelines, but these are rather general. Mr. Deblon stated that 9ndustrial revenue bonding was cr�ated by the Legislature as a financing tool for economic development, redevelopment, and things of that nature. The developer can get a lower interest rate from financing companies, bonding companies; underwriters, etc. The developer comes to the City and asks for industriat revenue bonds. The only thing the City does is pass a resolution authorizing the issuance of industriai revenue bonds. Ms. Mod�OrStTomdBerkelmanChwho has�introduced aLbill�thatwouldedeletea:heate � Legisla . � use of bonds for recreational or co�rcial projects. Mr. Deblon s�theateaguedo � nnesotaeGities.�nH��t � he wouldtcheck again and bonding'from He stated he would like try to have this information before the next meeting. the Camnission members to review the Informati'orr Packet and make recommendations �pr possibly improv�n9 the packet. !lOTION BY MS• MODIG� SBCONDED BY MR• C.�1BSL� T� CONTINUE ZNPUSTRIAL RE[�ENUE BONDING UNTIL THfi NSXT MEST=NG. pPON A[iOTCS VOTE� ALL VOTING AYS� CHAIRPEIZSON OQUjSP DS��ED THS MOTION �lRRISD UNA�IIMOUSLY. 3, OTHER BUSIaE55: .. . .. . � . . . _� i�_ r...wnnnitv �2VE�ODfA211t C.ORMI17551 ' A. Dlscuss7on un ��_ , �• --- - rote6as�a�commissionat keestatedsin�someswaysntheycareeredundant tor the Plaandnneed to5be�narrowedaybNetstatedltheydhaveebeen asked by global the PTanning Commission to talk about their roleHenstated�herfeltt they, as a comm4ssion, should really be doing. they needed to redefine their goals• He stan�dCh��+�sionslandt�ifnso, if other communities had community developme what were the roles of these commissions? Do- starttworkin9efrom scratchshnUputtingdthWngshtogetheryorasearch� 9 out and find out what other community development commissions o. Ms. Gustafson stated she would like to know what role a commission could play in fulfilling a need that is yet unmet in this cotr¢nunity. Dr. Vos suggested that the Commission members have assigned tasks such otherecoironissions,nonengroupCCOntact�ngeatherCCOmmunitiesrtoUSeeht w�t what their goals and obaectives are for community development, and another group doing some brainstorming. Mr. Oquist recommended that all the Commission members go over the goals and objectives. He asked Staff to obtain copies of the other sent2outcto the�Commissaon membe seearlieraso theyehaddtimettohreview them before the next meeting. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 10, 1981 PAGE 4 Ms. Gustaf�on stated she would be willing to call other cort�nunities � to find out if there are other community development comnissions and, if so, vthat roles`these comnissions play in their communities. MOTION BY MR. CABEL� SECONDED BY FZS. MODTG� TO CONTINUE DISCUSSION ON THE PVRPpSE OF TEtfi COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIOlV. � UPON A VOICE�VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLRRED THS MOTION CRRRZED UNANIMOUSLY. ADJOURNMENT: NUTION BY MS. GUSTAFSON, SECONDED BY MR. GABEL, TO ADJOURN THE MEBTING. UPON A VOICE VOTS, ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE FEBRUARY 10� 1981, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN�T COMMISSION�ADJOURNED AT 9:05 P.M. - . Respectfully subm�, � ynhe' a a Recording Secretary � MEMO T0: Planning Commission 36 �� , % �. MEMO FROM: Willia Deblon, Associate Planner (Staff to Community Development Comm.) MEMO DATE: february 20, 1981 Re: Clarification of Paragraphs 3 and 4 of Virgil Herrick's Memo On February 10, 1981 the Fridley Commurity Development Commission passed a notion to forward the draft "Conversion Condominium Licensing" and Mr. Herrick's January 23, 1981 memo on to you. They also requested that before you receive these items that Mr. Herrick be asked to clarify Paragraphs 3 and 4 of his memo. I believe what is meant in paragrph 3 is that no ordinance may be adopted that prohibits or imposes conditions on conversions before a public hearing is held. Paragraph 4 goes on to say that testimony given at the public hearing would have to substantiate findings of fact that shortages of low and moderate rental units existed in the City. I believe that if Sectian 209.05 8pplication was amended to read, "The application for conversior� condominium shall be accompanied by the following information:"......., and if Section 209.06 Condition of Approval were drapped then the City is not prohibiting or imposing any condi±ions on conversions and could pass this ordinance, The City vrould then know when a conversion was taking place and further ensure that the action is not in violation of the Uniform Condominium Act (CH 582-1980 Session). WSD/de � ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINAMCE ESTABLISHING CHAPTER 209 OF FRIDLEY CITY CODE ENTITLED "CONVERSION CONDOMIP�IUM" LICENSING 209.01 Purpose The Council of the City of Fridley deems that it is in the interest and proinotion of the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the City of Fridley that the owner(s) of a multiple dwelling intending to convert to condominium units, register the intent with the City before such a conversion is initiated. 209.02 Definitions For the purposes of this chapter, except where the context indicates otherwise, the following words mean: a. Condominium: A multiple dvrelling in which portions are desig- nated for separate ownership and the remainder of which is designated for common ownership solely by the owners of these portions. A multiple dwelling is not a condominium unless the undivided inter?sts in the cor�mon eleinents are vested in the unit owners. b. Conversion Condominium: A multiple dwelling which has been converted from rental units to ownership �}nits in accordance with the uniform Condominium Act (CH. 582 - 1980 session. Dwelling Unit: A single unit providing complete independent living facilities for one or more persons including permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation. Multiple Dwelling: Any building or structure containing therein two or more dwelling units whether used solely or exclusively for residential purposes or otherwise. e. Owner: The person or body having an interest in a multiple dwelling as a fee owner or subordinate interest with the right to exercise control and management of the premises. 209.03. Registration At least 60 days prior to the conversion notice given to the tenants, the owner of a multiple dwelliny in the City of Fridley shall file with the City a certificate of registration on a form provided by the City. At that tiine, the owner shall also file therewith an application for license from the City and pay the license fee. 37 PURPOSE DEFINITIONS REGISTRATIOPJ � Page 2 -- ORDINFlNCE N0. 209.04 Certificate of Registration, License, and Fees A certificate of registration shall be requireu of any owner of a multiple dwelling located within the City of Fridley who intends to convert such a building to condominiums. The license fee shall be provided in Chapter 11 of this code. 7his section does not exempt the owner of the annual multiple dwelling license as set forth in Chapter 220 of the Fridley City Code. 209.05 Application No certificate of registration and application for a conversion condominium license shall be approved unless the application contains the following information: 1 2 Description of ground area by street number and legal description. Size of the building. 3. Number of stories and height in feet. 4. Total floor area of the building. 5. Floor plans of proposed modifications. 6. Number of dwelling units in the condominium. 7. : Total area provided on premises for� off street parking. A certification by the owner that the building is not in violation of the provisions as set forth in Chapter 220 of the Fridley City Code. 9. The name and address of the individual to which any notice or order respecting the premises may be served or given during the conversion. 209.06 Condition of Npproval No certificate of registration and application for a conversion condominium license shall be approved if there exists within the city a significa�t shortage of rental dwellings available to low and moderate income individuals or families, or to establish or maintain the City's eligibility for any federal or state program providing direct or indirect financial assistance for housing to ihe city. 0974A 3� CERTIFICATE OF REGISRATION LICENSE, AND FEES APPLICATION CONDITION OF APPROVAL � MEMORANDUM T0: WILLIAM S. DEBLON City of Fridley Planning Department � FROM: VIRGIL C. HERRICK, CITY ATTORNEY �-'«�" RE: PROPOSED CONVERSION CONDOMINIUM LICENSING ORDINANCE DATE: JANUARX 23, 1981 I have examine3 your Memorandum of January 15, 1981 with the attache3 copy of Fridley's proposed Conversion Condominium Licensing Ordinance. I call your attention to Minnesota StatuCe Section 515.A.1-106(c). This section provides that a City: • "..may prohibit or impose reasonable conditions upon the conversion of buildings to the condominium form of ownershi.p only if there exists within the city a significant shortage of suiCable rental dwellings available to low and moderate income in3ividuals or families or to establish or maintain the city's eligibility for any federal or state program providing direct or indirect financial assistance for housi.ng to the city. Prior to the a3opCion of an ordinance pursuant to Ghe authority granted in this subsection, the city sha11 conduct a public hearing." It would be my opin'ion that before th2 City ceuld adopt a proposed ordinance, a public hearing would have to be held, pursuant to reason- able notice. I believe that testimony would have to be received and a record made to substantiate findings o£ fact that there existed a shortage of rental dwellin�s available to low and moderate income individuals or thaC the conversion would impair the City's eligibility for State and Federal financial assistance. If such an or3inance is adopted, it would remain in effect for eighteen months. If the City wished to continue such an ordinance, another public hearing would have to be held an3 the same findings of fact would have Co be found to exist. I have checked caith Minneapolis and St. Paul regarding Chis type of ordinance. I have been advised that St. Pau1 has not adopted such an ordinance. It is my understanding that Minneapoli.s has a3opted an ordinance but it does not contain the provisi.on discussed above. cc: Jerry Boardman cc: 3ohn rlora cc: Nasim Qureshi Vti11i� City of I'ridley APYE111.S COMMISSION MEETIN� - TUESDAY, FG3F;'IF�RY 10, 1981 Page 1 CALL `1'O ORDER: Vice Chairwoman Gabel called the App�als Commissian meeting of February 10� 1981 to order at 7:35 n.m. ROLL CALL: MemY,ers Present: Patricia Ga�el, Dick Kemper, Alex �3arna Members Absent: Virginia Schnabel, Jim Plemel Others Present: Clyde Moravetz, City of Fridley APPROVE APPEALS CONiMISSION D7INUTES OF JANUARY 27, 1951: MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Kemper, to approve the Appeal:, Coicmission minutes. of January 27r 1981 as wzitten. UPON A VOICE VOTE, AI.L VOTSNG AYE, VICE CHI�IRWCMAtd GASEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARR2ED UNANIMOUSLY. 1, REQUEST FOR A VF2?IANCE TQ THF, INTERIM. DEVELOPMENT REGULATSONS EOR THE MISSISSIPPT RIVE;R CORRIDGR CRITICAL PREA, SECTION G, 4� (B,�) TO Ri:DUCE TO 70 FEE'P THE REQUIREGL:?vT THAT IN URBl,�I DF.VELOPED DISTRICTS NO S`lHUCTURE: O? F.OA7 Sli::::., BP PI,Z'�Cr.D ;v0 L:�SS 'tiif.N 1.iiQ FEx'T }RQs" Ttir: NC3?L�iR7:, H7GH6dATER MARY. OF T"riE�itIVEF, Z�iND NO LESS THAN 40 FB'ET FRO1K BLUI�FLIh�'S, S-� ALLOW AN EXISTING D44ELLING TO ENCLOSE PAkT OF AN E?',ISTIitG DECK� OiS LOT 1� , -'---'--- BTOCK 5� P�:,ARSp:v'S CFv�,IGi7ia1 1�STAT:;S SF?CC:1i7 ADL�1'1Ui7� Ti;i, �5A'�1li BiIi7G 7506 AL,AEN :^IAY N.E. (Request by William S. Peterson for P?alter Rasmussen, 7806 Alden S4ay N.E.� Fridley, PSN 55432). F4illiam S. Peterson was present £or Walter Rasmussen. t•iOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Kemper to open the public hearang. UPON A VOTC& VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE CHAIRWOMAN GABF.L UE^LAK°D TAE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:40 P.M. � Vice Chariwoman Gabel read the Staff Report: AUfdflTf.E;�fr�yLIVfi ::'i'Rf'i' f:i;i'OF2'P 7i70u T�l.den S�lay D1.F:. A. �S'Uf3I,1C F'U}3'O:;ti: Sf�:li�/ftU 3';� F?r r�•JT.f,?i'tF:.^.'I':�c ' 7'hc p:irl�osc for. Chc star.dai:u;; and ctuid.r:l.inc� a; ].aiQ vut by th�'Intcri;� llevelop;ne�iL' P.�c��11nCi.o:is for thc 1di:,:is::ippi River Corxiclor Critical nrea az-e as follu•,oe; : a. 7U protect and ;�res:erve u ui�ique �n:i va2u�L,?.e state ancl rec�ional resoiirce for Chc bciiafie of ttie }rca7.th, s�zfety and �relfare of tha citizens for the ::tate,rc7ion, and naL.i.on; b, To prevert and miti.9atc iz-reversi.bJe damage to `his state, regio.^.al, and national resourcc; APPE�L; COMMISSION MEL•'TING - February 10, 1981 Page 2 c. To preserve ana enl�nre its natural, aesthetic, cultural, and histori.cal value for t:hA public usc; , d. To z�r.eserve and pr.otect thc river as an essential element in the national� s W te, and req;onal transportation, sewer and water and recreationaZ syste�ns; and e. To pzotect and preserve the biological a:�d ecological functions of the'corridor. In ):eeping oiiCti the above, the publi.c purpose served by the critical areas desiynation, Section G, 4(U2) states that tt�re must be a 100 foot setl�ack from the normal high i�ater narl; of the river. B. STIsTED iLT�FZDSIIII': "L�1e request a variznce to 70 £eet from the ;Sissi.ssip�i River regulation requiring all buildings to be located 100.�eet °rom the river to add an addition to t1�e northwest <vid southeast carners o= thv existing house. 7.'ne additio:ts are not aay closer to the iiver than the present deck a;3 both additions are to be desiyned for passive solar neating." C. AD?IINISTF�i.IVE Sii1°P F�VIE�I: Ii� keeping ��ith Section J3 of the Intciim Develo ner.t Regulations : or Ule 6lississippi P.iver Corridor Critical lrea, the local unit of govern-lent may grant a variance from ttie strict ce�oliance of the setbac3: o_° the inter.im regiilatiens after an administrative hearing conducted accordir.g to the regulations of tliat local unit o£ govern�enc, and may be graated on).y tiicn, afler the follcaii:g fin3in9s �re mad�: ].. Tlie >trict enforccrient of the setl�ack or hei5nt restrictions t�iill result in wii:cecessn�y }lzr.dship. "flzsdshio": zs used in tne considerztion of a dir,tensior. ��ariancc r�eans Chat the Property in question caa not be put Eo a reasona�le usc under. tlie dinensioz provisio� oi these In�erin Develop:nclt Regulations. � 2. There arc esceptio�ial. circ;Lmstances uni.que to the nroperty that were not crcated by a landa::ncr aftcr AZ�ril 25, 1975, 3. Tlie dir,icnsion va2-iance does not allo;a any u;;e t'iat is not a ca:.�atible use in the lai:c use distric� in �;hicl; the property is located. 4. 2•he dimensinn vlriance o:ill uot niter the essential character of tne loca.lit:y as esC.iblish�.d by these Interim D.vclo_�:;�nt Requlations. 5. The di�acn�ion variance �aill not be coutra_y to the order. ':r. ?'eterson sho�red the Cnmmission drawinc7s of the pror?osed additions and Mr, Moravetz produced some aerial photographs of the area. Mr. Peterson said the deck runs�the tot.al riverside of the house and the addition will be two stories with a little treehouse (loft) on the northwest corner and the greenhouse addition will be on the southeast corner and will come out even with the end of the house. He said the windows are the passive solar heating and will all face south. He further stated that aesthetically it will improve the house and help with the energy bill. Mr. Peterson said the additions will not be any closer than the existing deck and the sloped roof will match the existing house and t.he brick wi11 match the exist:inq brick. Mr. Barna asked about the heat trans- ference method and rir. Peterson said they will pull it in from the lower level with a thermostat-actuated fan. Vice Chairwoman Gabel said she was not sure about restriction #I and Mr. Barna said it could be granted under restriction #4. Mr. Y.emper noted that the building was built prior to 1975 and nothing is being put closer to the river than it is already. s—...� APPEI�LS COMM.ISSION MEETING - February 10, ]981� Page 3 Mr. Barna st.ated t.hat the character or the land use is not being changed. Mr. Keroper said that, i.f you look at why the Interim Corridor Regulatzons were'established, doing this to the does not v?olate the intent of those Regulations. Vice Chairwoman Gabel agreed with that and felt that it would not be damaging and it ia a well taken care of home. Mr. Peterson said they would like to start buil�3ing thi.s spring, wkien the frost goes out. MOTIOr7 BY Mr. Kemper, seconded by Mr. t3arna, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, N.L VOTING AYE� VICE CHAII2WOMAN GABL.*u.DECLARED THE PUBLIC HE1�tING CLOSED AT 7:55 P.M. MOTION by Mr. Kemper, seconded by Mr. Barna, that the Appeals Cott¢nission re- commend to the City Council, through the Planning Comnission, approval of the variance to the Interim Development Regulations for the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area, Section G, 4, (B,2) to reduce to 70 f.eet the require- ment that in urban developed districts no structure or road shall be placed no less' than 100 feet from the normal highwater mark of the r.iver, and no less than 40 feet from the blufflines, to allow an existing dwelling to enclose part of an existing deck, on Lot 1L, Block 5, Pearson's Craigway Estates Second Addition, the samo being 7806 Alden Way N.E., Fridley, MN 55432. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VQTING AYE, VZCE CHAIRWOMAN�GABEL DECLARED THE�MOTION CARRIEP UNANIMOUSLY. � 2.� REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FURSUANT TO CHI:PTER 219 OF THE FRIDLEY�CITY CODE, TO INCREASE THE�SSIUARE FOOTAGE OF APi IDEi�TIFICATION SIGN FROM THE ALLOWED 24 SQUARE FEST TO 56.83 SQUAIL FEET, TO ALLOW A NEW IDF.NTII'ICATIO:v SSGN FOR UNITY HOSPITAL, LOCI�TED ON PARCEL 600� IN THE NORTH HALF OF SBCTIOD? 11 THE SAME BF.ING 550 OSBORN 4017 Central Avenue N,E., (Reqc.�st by Ruvelson & Associates, , MN 55421). Jelnes Ruvelson, 4017 Central Avenue N.E., was present. P70TIJt: by I�ir. Barna, seccrr?.ed by Air. Y.1ttpe-r, to open the public hearir.g. UPOI3 A�JOICE VOTE� ALL Vp'1'1NG AYE, VICE CY.A_TP,FION�AN G�1FiEL DECL7�2ED TfiF. Pi7RLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7;57 P.M. . I�ice Cnairwoman Gabel read the Staff Report: AP1Ii�ISTFLITIVE STAFF RIiPORT 550 OsUorne Koad .id.�. A. PLiBIC PURPOSf; SF.RVP.D ]3Y REQUIRFPtPNT; Section 201.042, 2, required a maximum si.ze of tw�nty-four square feet for an "l�rea Identification" siga in R-1 zoniug. Puhlic purpose served Uy this requizement is to contr.ol visual pollution and excessive use of si�ns 9n a residential at'ea. $. STAT�D II�ll:DSiIIP; °ih3ity llospital rcquired idcn�ification; present si.gn requites complete ren�odeli.n�; exisryn� sign and/ar pzuposcd remodel of prescnt si�n requires a variunce.° APPEAT,S COMMISSZON MEETIN, - February 20, 19$2 Page 4 C. ADMINISTRATIV� STAFI' F.EVEI[J: T}ie hospital is constructed on ptoperty that is zoned R-1. The nature of development along OsUorne in this area is rather commercial in appearance. Therefore, if the F3oard recommends approval of this request, the staff has no stipulation to suggest. We are working with the hospital on additional right-of-way along Madison, aad are reviewing a long range plau for landscaping and developnent. Mr. Ruvelson showed the conenis;;ion photographs .sd :;aid he was coimnissioned to come up with a sign for L'nity Hospital as they ar.e unhappy with their present sign, He stated that while obtaining a permit it was discovered that there was never a permit for the existing hospital siqn. He said the hospital sign will be anodized bronzed alwninimi (dark brown) with white lettering and the emergency sign will be completely replaced and made smaller using a blue face and arrow in that sign. At this time, Vice Chairwoman Gabel reported that Fridtey had a sign cozmAittee to study signs in the area and it was £elt that Unity Hospital signs were "undersigned" and hard to identify and difficult to £ind. She stated she drove by these signs before the meeting and the emergency sign was badly obscured by another sign and the trees growing in front of it. She felt that the sign should be bigger. Mr. Ruvelson said he will talk to Unity about that but he really felt the emergency sign should be scaled down in terms oP its relationship to the hospital sign. Mr. Kemper asked about lighting and Mr. Ruvelson said the emergency will have an arrow and will be well lit and the hospital sign will be lit from the landscape area. Mr. Barna felt tRat the sign by the entrance is displeasing and it is also confusing as to where you should turn into the hospital. Mr. Kemper stated that just changing this sign and making it a hit more pleasing does not solve the emergency sign problem; it is a concern as it does not point to the right direction. He fnrther stated that he would like Mr. Ruveison to pass this information along. Vice Chai��oman Gabel askeci how high the sign would be and if the lettering will be any larger. Ns. Ruvelson said they are not going to change the existing base, the size wi11 change just slightly and the lettering will not be any larger. T%ice Chainaoman Gabel felt the present lettering is znadequate anc3 it sl�ould be lar.ger. Mr. RUVelson £elt if people are able to drive into the correct driveway, the size of the sign should be adequate and he would 2ike to study the size of the emergency sign a bit further. Mr. Moravetz stated that the atea is rat.her commercial in nature although it is zoned R-1 and that the City is working with Unity about acquiring right of way of Madison Street. He said siqn placements are not going to interfere with this and that the emergency sign is not an issue as £ar as the variance is concerned. Mr. Barna felt the design for the hospital sign is more pleasing and he has no objection to that. Mr. Ruvelson stated that the present sign is about 55 square feet and they are askiiig for 5G.83 square feet. MOTION by Mr. Kemper, seconded by Mr. Rarna, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE CHAIkWOD7AN G_ABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HliARING�CLOSED AT 8;22 P,M, � __�� APPEALS COMMISSSON MEETING - February 10, 1981 � Page 5 MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by �ir. Kemnez, that the Appeals Commission re- commend to the City Council, through the Planning Commission, approval of the vaxiance to increase the squure Eootage of an identification sign fxom the allowed 24 square feet to 56.83 square feet, to allow a new identification sign for Unity Hospital, located on Paxcel 600, in the North Half of Section 11, the same being 550 Osborne Road N.E., Fridley, P7N 55432. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING nYE� VICE CHAIRWOMAN G.ABEL DECLAkED THE MOTION CARRSED UNANIMOUSLY. AD30URNh1ENT: MOTION by tdr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Kemper, to adjourn. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ATT. VOTING AYE, VICE CHAIRWONIAN GABEL DECLARED THE APPEAI,S COMMISSION MEETING- OF FEBRUARY 10, 1981, A➢JOURNED AT 8:22 P.D1. Respectfully submitted, il�Y�-�C �C�� c'/'/ Deb Niznik, Recording Secretaxy CALL TO ORDER: CI7Y OF FRTDLEY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING Y' FEBRUARY 11, 1981 Chairperson Hughes called the February 11, ]981, Parks & Recreation Commission meeting to order 7:34 p.m. ROGL CALL: Members Present: Barbara Huyhes, Dave Kondrick, Dick Young, Dan Al1en (arr. 7:43 p.m.) Members Absent: � �an Seeger Others Present: Charles Boudreau, Parks & Recreation Director Siah St. Clair, City Naturalist Gerald R. Maeckelbergh, 425 Rice Creek Blvd. Bob Barnette, 541 Rice Creek Blvd. - Councilman-At-Large A1lan I. Rolland, 188 - 71st Way N.E. Kenneth L. Moxness,1604 - 66th Ave. N.E. Ruth Dunn, 5261 Central Ave. N.E. APPROVAL OF JANUARY 14, 1981, PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. YOUNG� TO APPP.OVE THE JANUARY I4� 2981� PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSIt1N MINUTES AS WRITTEN.. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRPERSON HUGHES DECLARED THE MOTION CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY. APPROVAL OF AGENDA;y The fotlowing items were added to the agenda: NSP Easement - Item D under "Director's Report" Thank You Letter - Item E under "Director's Report" Announcements and Hand-outs - Item F under "Director's Report" Elections of Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson - Ttem p under "New Business" Chairperson Hughes declared the agenda adopted'as amended. �� PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEE7ING, FEBRUARY 71, ]981 PAGE 2 1. DIRECTOR'S REPORT: A. Tour of Nature Center Facility - Siah St. Clair � Dr. Boudreau stated that since the tour of the nature center building was one of the major reasons for the meeting being at the factlity, he had requested that Mr. St. Clair be on han d to give a tour of the facility, explain what the space is to be utilized for, and how it will dovetail with the programs they have planned for the future. Mr. St. Clair stated this facility is going to give them much more ability to do a wider variety of programming than in the past, but it is important to understand that, from the nature center program stand- point, he does not visualize the programs being housed completely in the facility. A lot of their programming takes place away from the facility. Mr. St. Clair stated one of the major pM losophies he has in the programming in the Naturalist Division is to take a lot of the programs out to homes, schools, other parks in the community, and other natural areas in the community. It is important to keep that in perspective in light of conversations that have been occurring lately where people may be getting the impression that the who7e program is going to be in this building. Mr. St. Clair stated their programming has two basic concepts: They are trying to organize the programs to be as mu7ti- media oriented as possible, which means they are not trying to tie themselves down to one specific medium through which they give their programming. They wtll be working with schools, church groups, civic organizations, clubs, scout groups, etc. Ne likes to divide it so they have 25% with schools; 25% with private programs; 25% with public programs; and 25% with public registered programs. Tf�ere is the facet of non-person3l pragramming which is walk-on visitors--peop7e who come in to see the exhibits in the building, walk the trails, cross-country ski, and just to enjoy the park and the other natural areas in the community. (Mr. Allen arrived at 7:43 p.m.) Mr. St. Clair stated they offer different programming to try to reach as many different age and interest groups as possible. Mr. St. Clair then conducted a tour of the i�ature center facility to the Commission members and visitors. ;,,.� PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY T1, T981 PAGE 3 Mr. Barnette stated he would like to know if there were any estimates � of what it is going to cost to operate and maintain the nature center building. . Ms. Hughes stated that if Mr, Barnette wanted to discuss this, it could be put on the agenda for a future meeting. ` Mr. Barnette stated he would like to have this item put on a future agenda. Dr. Boudreau stated that June or July would be an appropriate month to have some information on the operating budget for this segment of the program. Ms. Hughes stated this item would be Qut on the June or July agenda. Mr. Barnette asked what the Comnission was gaing tn charge people out- side of Fridley for use of the park, if any. Ms. Hughes stated that, in terms of charging for programming, that is an item that gets developed according to cach kind of program, and it is the kind of thing they try to keep as low as possible. There is some programming that is done free, and to those who are unable to pay, tfie City will still provide these services to them. Mr. Allen Rolland, 188 - 71st Way N.E., stated if the City was not going to charge anything, where is the money going to come from to operate the bui7ding and heat it? Ms. Nughes stated they will have some answers.in terms of those things in June or July. Mr. Ro]land staied that 5-6 years ago, there was a meeting at Stevenson School on the nature center versus the golf course. Everyone who talked in favor of the nature center said it was going to be tax-free. - It was not going to cost the taxpayers anything, and the golf course was going to cost a lot. He stated this bui7ding is great, but of all the times he has visited the park, he has never seen more than 2-3 people at any one time. If this facility is going to cost the tax- payers money, he is against it. Mr. Ken Moxness, 1604 - 66th Ave. N.E., stated he heard that argument about six years ago. He stated it is hard to believe that people actually believed that something worth something was not going to cost anybody any money. He felt that was just an excuse. He stated he doesn't have a cabin up in the North Woods, and he is here every summer and winter. Ne stated it is very nice to have a place that hasn't PARKS & RECRERTION COMMISSION MEE7ING, FEBRUARY 11, 1981 PAGE 4 been bulldozed o�ver and developed and turned into something aesthetical-ly pretty. He really appreciated the opportunity of having a park like, this itt his own community. It is rea7ly a very creative thing to take 140 acres out of production. Mr. Moxness stated this is a wonderful building. A lot of thought has gone into the development of the building to facilitate the educative part and the aesthetic part of the natore centeh. Mr. Gerald Maeckelbergh, 425 Rice Creek Blvd., stated he and his family are realty appreciative of this nature center. It is a real asset to the community, and he hoped that now the City Council will get behind it 100q'and get it as excellent as possible without haranguing what has been in the past. Dr. Boudreau stated that, for the record, the only tax monies he is aware of that have been spent in North Park itself have been for the satellite facilities used to facilitate the programming. Outside of that, the maintenance personnel have the same agreement that they have with the Islands of Peace, in that any work performed or requested of the City has been reimbursed to the City from the Springbrook Nature Center Foundation. The park was purchased with LAWCON funding, the buildinq was built with Metro- politan Council funding, and, to date, very limited tax monies have been . spent on this facility or this ground. The walkways, the trail systems have al] been built by vo7unteers. Volunteer work will be used to complete the inside of the building. So, if there are any tax monies spent out of City monies, it should be very minimal as it is in most of their facilities. Ms. Hughes stated the Commission is charged with advising on the deveiopment of administration programming of the parks and recreation in Fridley, and that includes a lot of things. It is a well-rounded program, because of the excellent staff. The staff could program in back yards of people would let them. But, it helps to have some very special kinds of purpose facilities. She stated one other thing they ought to note is that there was a referendum about how this property should be used. It is not something the Parks & Recreation Commission can ignore. It is a7so true that this Commission tries to ]ook at the total recreational program, the total park program, and give some well- rounded balance to it. She did not think they were doing something with this property or building that was against the general interests of the community. Mr. Kondrick stated this building is going to be the betterment of this community. He stated this bui7ding's facilities and the grounds will give kids and aduits the oppartunity to get an extra something out of the City of Fridley. He was very proud to have played a small part in getting this buildSng, and he was even more proud to have the opportunity to see it this evening. � PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 11, 1981 PAGE 5 B. Neighborhood Meetin�, Feb. 25, l98] Dr, Baudreau stated this was in conjunction with the corrmunity park development. He stated that Park Construction has been awarded the contract for work on I-94. The City had a very preliminary agreement with Park Construction that if they were awarded this contract, Park Construction would remove 200,000 cu. yds. of sand from the comnunity park development. In return, Park Construction would bring back 400,000 cu. yds. of fill material to be used in the community park to facilitate the ball diamond and athletic complex. Ne stated they have written the County and have gotten permission to dig the pond, irrigation, and that type of thing. Park Construction has consented on this agreement with the City to do all of the fill work and all of the finish grading for park development. They hope to start around the first of March. Dr. Boudreau stated that in an effort to keep the neighborhood informed, a neighborhood informationat meeting has been scheduled for Feb. 25 at 7:30 p.m. at � ty Hall concerning the total 40 acres of land, what plans they have to date for that area, and what agreements have been worked out for in-kind or free services to be performed in that area. City Council has agreed with that agree�ent with Park Construction. C. Ed�ewater Garden Development Dr. Boudreau stated the Edgewater Garden area is an L-shaped piece of land west of the tracks, north of Mississippi, by the church. This land has been tax forfeit for years. It was first proposed to be used for community gardens, 6ut a lot of pepple said they did not want community gardens in that area. It went to the neighborhood meetings with the thought that some day there would be a park development in Edgewater Gardens for that small pocket of people who live in the area of East River Road, north of P9ississippi, west of the tracks. Dr. Boudreau stated the City Council has recently purchased the tax � forfeit property from the County. They have come to an agreement with the church located on the west side of the property at the south end far bikeway/walkway easements which will facilitate the City bikeway/ walkway for north/south bikeway traffic to Mississippi and out to East River Road. For the easements, the City had to give up 3=� ft, of property to enlarge the church parking lot. Before the City agreed to that, the church agreed to give the City $4,000 for that property easement for parking purposes to purchase playground equipment, and the church agreed to curb and landscape the parking lot. This will all be on the east side of the church and will not interfere with the park plan that was originally shared with that neighborhood. That park plan called for a tennis court area, playground equipmeni,ball diamond backstop, hard surface basketball area, and an open area. Written into the agreement - will also be the City's use of the church parking lot when ii is not being used for church purposes. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY ll, 1981 PAGE 6 Dr. Boudreau stated this agreerr�nt has gone to City Council, and he believed the agreement has been finalized with the church. " Dr. Boudreau stated the City Manager has infiormed him that there are plans to sell the three lots on the very north end which are not:in the overa7l neighborhood plan. They hope to sell these lots and gain about $40,000 which will then be put towards improvements in the park. Dr. 8oudreau stated they hope to have the park developed by mid-summer. Ms. Hughes asked why this park develQpment was not brought to the Parks & Recreation Corcenission before now. Dr. Boudreau stated that as far as the agreement was concerned, it was not a park. They were using the land for park purposes, but it was still City land. That is entirely a City Council decision as to whether or not it is going to be a park development. D. NSP Easement Dr. Boudreau stated it has been passed by this Commission and City Council to have a possible NSP easement for a power line to run on the west side of North Park along the tracks. The Commission and the City Council have both said there should be four stipulations on any easement: (1) a replacement of an equal amount of land by NSP taken out for the easement; (2) consideration of a sum of money for the ease- ment; (3)the return of the easement back for park use; (4) for any power line that went in, the poles must be lined up with the existing poles with no change. - Dr. Boudreau stated that izefore. that could take place, this plan had to go before LAWCON, because the land was purchased with LRWCON funds, and it had to go to the State and Federal. They got word yesterday that State Pianning received a letter in the mail that ihis plan has been approved by the Federal people in Ann Arbor, Michigan., and the City can go ahead and work out the agreement with NSP. NSP has agreed to purchase and give deed to the City for an equal amount of land, about three acres, on the far southwest corner of the park. They have agreed to give the City $121,000 for the easement. They have agreed to return the use of that easement back to park use and line the poles up with the existing poles. Dr. Boudreau stated it was their feelings that this will benefit the City more than the alternative routes and will give them an additional three acres of land which can be used for another entrance into the park, as a small picnic area, or interpretive site, This has gone to City Council and has been accepted by City Council. A motion was made and passed 4-] that the �121,00U be allocated for use only in North Park and that 1t not be reverted back into the general fund. This money will be used for improvement of the North Park land itself and/or the nature center facili.ty. , PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSiON MEETING, FEBRUARY 11, 1981 PAGE 7 Mr. Barnette stated there was some inference that because this plan - had to go back through LAWCON, there was a stipulation in the origin,al LAWCON monies that this money from the easement has to revert back to North Park. He stated he had argued that this was not true. He asked the Commission if they knew if that was a stipulation in the origina7 LAWCON funding. ' Dr. Boudreau stated he did not believe that kind of stipulation was written into LAWCON agreements anywhere in the country. Ms. Nughes stated the concurrence with this plan to consider an ease- ment where the lines will go now went through this Commission, the Planning Commission, and was heard and discussed by the Springbrook Nature Center Foundation. The concurrence of the Comnission, Planning Commission, and the Foundation was on the basfs that this money would come back to the park. She was not sure any kind of easement or land trade or anything of that nature woald happen without that kind of understanding. ' Mr. Barnette stated he would like to see the Parks & Recreation Commission minutes where this recot�nendation was made. Ms. Hughes stated they would research the minutes and find this informa- tion for Mr. Barnette. E. Thank-You Letter Dr. Boudreau stated he had received a letter from Irv Lust, Director of Baseball, Blaine/Spring lake Park Athletic Association, thanking Dr. Boudreau and his staff for the excelTent ¢ooperation they had received in 1980. Mr. Lust was also requesting the use of Flanery Park from May 1, 1981, to Aug. 2, 1981. Dr. Boudreau stated this was part of an on-going agreement with the Blaine/Spring Lake Park Athletic Association that they get the use of Flanery Park or Madsen Park, because they do service Fridley residents who live in those areas. Dr. Boudreau stated Staff has no problem with this request, and they will have the same agreement with them again this year un7ess the Commiss4on had any objections. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. ALLEN, TO RECEIVE THE LETTER F1ZOM IRV LUST DATED FEB. 2, 198I. � �UPON R VOICE.VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRPERSON HUGNES DECLAREA THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY. F. Announcements and Hand-outs Dr. Boudreau stated the third annual ethnic festival, the Fridley Celebration of Nations, will be held on Mar. 28-29 at the Community Education 6uilding. It is a cooperative effort between Community Education and Parks & Fecreation and a lot of other people. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETIPJG, FEBRUkRY ll, 1981 PAGE 8 2. 3. Dr. Boudreau stated it would be very w�rthwhile for the Cortmission members to visit the festival. Dr. Boudreau stated the Minnesota Melikin Puppets will be presenting a co7lection of poetry on Feb. 22 at 2:00 p.m. at the Fridley Senior High School. He stated this is sponsored by the Fridley Recreation Department, and Staff would appreciate the Commission attending these kinds of things. Dr. Boudreau stated that on Nov. 10, 1980, Mr an announcement to all 1980 softbal] managers managers' maeting. The meetings will be held also stated again the policy that all manager: meeting or a representative or they will not I in the program. CHAIRPERSON'S REPOR7: Ms. Nughes stated she had nothing to report. OLD BUSTNESS: A. Citizens' Advisory Committee - Dan Allen Kirk had sent out about the ]981 softball March 17-18-19. He has most be at the roanagers' e allowed to participate Ms. Hughes stated the P7anning Commission did not concur with the motion made at the last meeting requesting financial assistance from City Councii to obtain a cost estimate of what a recreational building would cost. However, she thought the City Council has probably acted on it already. Mr. Allen stated the Committee has outlined what they feet should be priorities if a facility is built. They are going to present two basic buildings--one which is a bare minimum iype of building and one with the extras. They ended up with five building packages, This is for the architect's benefit, and they are waiting for the architect to put cost estimates on these buildings. Mr. Maeckelbergh stated at one �ime he served as principal of River- wood School. He knows the difficulty the City has had in finding facilities in the school buildings for their programs, and he recog- nized all those kinds of problems. Yet, he knows that some time in the future, there is going to be an improvement of school and community working together to utilize these school facilities, He wanted to encourage the Commission to not duplicate faeilities that might be available under different people and different situations in the future. Mr. Maeckelbergh stated he had another area of concern and that was with hockey. He is a hockey parent, and the proximity to Columbia Arena has nothing to do with ice time for Fridley residents or hockey programs. He stated he has been told that Fridley is 5th, 6th, or 7th PARKS & RECREA7ION COMMTSSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 11, 1981 PAGE 9 on the list in getting ice time. He stated they have hardly used Columbia Arena-at all. He thought an ice arena was a real necessity. There are about 500 kids in hockey and broomball. Mr. Young stated he had trouble with an indoor hockey rink. The youth population in Fridley in 1970 showed close to 600 children in kinder- garten in the Fridley school system. This year there are only 180. The number of people that would probably be involved in youth hockey facilities wou7d be very limited and a small proportion of the community. They would be spending a large amount of do1lars for a small part of the population. Mr. Maeckelbergh stated he would also prefer an outdoor pool, because Fridley has an indoor pool. They just can't utilize it at this time. Dr. Baudreau stated the Citizens' Advisory Committee is planning to make a report to the Commission at the Commission's March meeting. Ms. Hughes stated they almost needed a special meeting in order to have plenty of time for this major item. She tentatively set Wed., March 25, for a special Commission meeting, and the Commission members should keep this date in mind. 4. NEW BUSINESS: A. Elections in March Ms. Hughes stated that elections for Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson will be in March. She stated it has been her philosophy on advisory commissions that the chai.rperson not remain tMe same all the time. She would encourage the other Commission members to keep this in mind, and if anyone would like to be chairperson, they should let the other members know. They should also keep in mind that being chairperson also means being a voting member on the Planning Commission. ADJOURNMENT: Chairperson Hughes declared the February 11, 1981, Parks & Recreation Commission meeting adjourned at 1Q:Q0 p.m. Respectfully su mitted, C r tiCv Lynn aba Recording Secretary �' CITY OF FRI�LEY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1981 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Commers called the February 12, 1981, Housing & Redevelopment Authority meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present Members Absent Larry Commers, Russell Houck, Carolyn Svendsen, Duane Prairie (arr. 7:59 p.m.) Elmars Prieditis Others Present: derrold Boardman, City Planner Mary Cayan, Human Services Assistant Mr /& Mrs. Del Price, 2631 Arthur St. N.E. Jerry Remmen, Contract Development Corporation Dave Schaaf, 6520 - 2nd St. N.E. APPROVAL Of JANUARY 8, 1981, HOUSING & REDEVEL4PMEN7 AUTHORITY MINU7ES: M02'ION BY MR. HOUCK� S�'CONDED.BY MS. SVENASEN, TO APPROVE THE JANURXY 8, 1981, HOUSINC & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTE5 AS WRITTEN.'� UPON A YDICE VOTS, UNANIMOUSLY. 1. LETTER ALL VOTING AYE� CHAZRPfiRSON COMMERS�DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED & MRS. PRI � F THE SALE PRICE Mr. Boardman stated they have two lots that sold for $4,000 and two lots for sale at $6,000. They are in the process of purchasing two more lots. The problem with the 56,000 lots is thai they are generally unworkable for most of the applicants. Out of five applicants, only one applicant has the possibility of coming up with that kind of money because the applicant has an existing home and some equiiy built up in that home. Mr. Boardman stated it is his recommendation to drop the value of those two lots and have all the prices on all of the lots at $4,000. The reasoning is they feel $4,000 is within reach for most of the peop7e who do qualify for the Large Family Program. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, �EBRUARY 12, ]98l PAGE 2 MOTION BY MR. NOUCK, SECONDED BY MS. SVENASEN, TO APFROVE TIiE REDUCTION OF THE LOTS LOCATED AT 5821 AND 5831 UNZVERSITY AVE, N.E.�FRONI A CASH.DOWN OF $6,000 TO A CASN DOWN OF $4,Q00� TRE DIFFERENCE TO BE ADDED TO THE MORTGAGE VALUE THEY HAVE��BEEN S.ACiNG AGAIMST THE PROPERTY. . -� UPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTSNG AYE� CHAIRPERSQN COMMERS DECLRRED THE MOTION � CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. . � 2. UPDATE fROM JERRY REMMEPI ON PNASE III DEVELOPMENT Also Memo #81-74 from Jerry Boardman to HRA Mr. Cormners stated the Commission members had a letter dated Feb. 3, 1981, from Mr. Remmen re: Status Report on Redevelopment of Phase III, Center Plaza Shopping Center, Fridley, Mn., with an attached schedule for the project. Mr. Remmen is atso requesting an extension af the original 12Q days on the timetable. Mr. Remmen stated he has some additional information since that letter. He has gotten a green light with Super Valu and will be meeting with the architect to redesign how they want the store laid out. From there to a Tetter of intent will take about six weeks. Mr. Commers asked if there had been any further headway with the five possible tenants Mr. Remmen had 7isted in his letter of Feb. 3. Mr. Rerrmen stated they are first required to lay out the store for Super Valu, because that is their main anchor tenant. .Ance they have Super Va1u firmed up as to location, they will sit down with the other tenants and firm locations and leases. Mr. Remmen stated they are in the process of setting up a limited partnership. They are setting up a$300,000 equity general limitetl partnership arrangement. He has three of the local businessmen who have asked to participate, and Contract Development Corporation has agreed ihey can participate. He stated that Borson has, in effect, agreed to be the general contractor. (Mr. Prairie arrived at 7:59 p.m.) Mr. Remmen stated, at this point, he is requesting a 90-day extension. Mr. Commers stated that with respect to the office structure as part of Phase I, what were the current fee]ings between Mr, Rerimien and City Staff relative to this? Mr. Remmen stated he has discussed this with Mr. Boardman over the past month. Contract Development Corporation would like to start on that project. They also have tenants interested in an entertainment center which they feel would be a very viabie part of the whole development. This would include a restaurant/ bar, bow7ing a17ey, theatre, and sports and health club, a7] under the same roof. 7hey are looking at putting this in Phase IT Area. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, FEBRUARY 12, 1981 PAGE 3 Mr. Remmen stated they would like to design two 45,000 sq. ft, sister office buildings. They would build one and when they hit their break-even point on leases, they would start construction on the second building with'an inter- connecting walkway. He stated the office buildings are the risky part of the redevelopment of this area. If they are going to be able to move on the office buildings, they would like to have the development rights on the ba]ance af the Center City project. They would have their architect working with City Staff on how to work the whole project out, and the entertainment center would be part of that. Mr. Boardman stated they had given Mr. Remnen an extension of 90 days on the shopping center. On the rest of the Center City project, it would be his recommendation that they give Contract Development Corporation the right for development and a timetable similar to that done for the shopping center - 120 days. If Mr. Remomen finds he needs more time, at that point tn time, the HRA will know about the shopping center. If Mr. Remmen is moving afiead all right on the shopping center, then they would have another month for the right for development for the rest of the project. At that time, if Mr. Remmen was able and willing to cor�nit to the rest of the project, they could put the package together, or he can request an extension, presenting a timetable such as he has done with the shopping center. Mr. Remmen stated it is more attractive to Contract Development Corporation, to his investors, and to Borson to do the whole area. If it was only for the 45,000 sq. ft. of office space, he was not so sure they would wani to proceed on that. If they can look at the tota] development of the area, they would be interested. Mr. Commers stated the question he had was with makinq the commitment to Contract Development Gorporation without seeing any �oposal as to what is going to be done with the various phases. He did not mind granting Mr. Remnen the right to go ahead and see what he could produce in 120 days, but without seeing anything or knowing specifically what his proposal is for development, Mr. Commers would be somewhat reluctant to tie that property up. Mr. Remmen stated the reason for asking for this right for development is to bring in his architect to do schematic drawings and to put his leasing man out in the field for potential office tenants. He couid easily spend $5,000-$15,000 in 90 days. He did not want to spend this money unless the HRA �ras very serious about his coming up with a viable plan that meets with the HRA's approval and is what the HRA has in mind for this section of Center City development. All he is asking for is an opportunity to put together a viable plan and put out a time schedule on when and how this development would proceed. Mr. Corrmers stated he could understand Mr. Remmen's position, and he could understand Mr. Remmen's reluctance to make a commitment for any sums of develop- ment monies without some kind of �surance of what the HRA's feelings are. Ne just was not sure they can tie that thing up at this point without any further information. ' HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, FEBRUARY 12, 1981 PAGE 4 Mr. Boardman stated the HRA may want to tie it to the preliminary presentation Mr. Rer�nen made sometime ago and tie it with a time period for more detailed schematics for that area. Then at that point in time, they could make the determination for an extension of time, MOTION BY MR. HOUCK, SECONDED BY MS. SVENDSEN, TO EXTEND THE ORIGINRL TIMETABLE AS REQUESTED BY MR. REMMEN OF CONTRACT DEVE7APMENT CORPORATZON FROM FEB. 12 TO 1dAY Z2, I981, RELATIVE TO THE PHRSE III SHOPPTNG CENTER PROJECT WEST OF UNIVERSITY AND SOUTH OF MISSZSSTPPI ST. � UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VO1'ING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE A20TION-CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � � � Mr. Remmen stated he could prepare schematics for the balance of the phases within 60 days. MOTION BY MR. HOUCK, SECONDED BY MS. SVENRSEN, TO GRAl7T A 60—DAY PERIOD TO CONTRACT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FROM FEB. 12, 2981��IN WHICH TO PRESENT THE HRA WITH MORE DETAILED PLANS FOR THE PROJECT� WSTH RESPECT TO THE OTHER PHASES OF THE CENTER CITY DEVELOPMENT. THE 60—DAY TIME PERIOD TO�BE A RIGAT FOR DEVEIAPMENT. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYfi, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS PECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY. . � Mr. Commers thanked Mr. Remmen for coming to the meeting. 3. INFORMATI Also Merc BOND B -]0 re: reitminary Hppiicatiion ror �ona 5aie 19. 1981: Mr. Boardman stated the6ond bid was awarded to John Nuveen & Co, Inc., on Jan. 19. The bond closing was Feb. 9 so they have received bond money in the amount of $2,173,000. That money has been invested at 16 1/8% and will be invested untii March 2, Mr. Commers stated he would like to have a final closing statement on that bond sale. He r�quested that Mr. Boardman ask the City Cierk to provide the HRA with the gross sale price minus the mst of the sale and the net figtare. Chairperson Commers dec7ared Memo �81-10 and attached information received into the record. 4. LET7ER FROM VIRGIL HERRICK TO TIMOTHY HEARSHMAN - STANDARD OIL: Mr. 6oardman stated that Standard Oil has made a counter-agreement to the City's initial purchase agreement. The counter-agreement has more stipulations. He stated Standard Oil's purchase agreement states that "Seller hereby agrees, subject to the conditions hereinafter set forth, to convey to such Purehaser by HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, FEBRUARY 12, 7981 PAGE 5 good and sufficient Warranty Deed a good and merchantab]e title to the above- described premises, subject'only to: (1) Existing leases, easements, sidetrack and license agreements, if any, whether of record or not; and (3) Taxes and special assessments against the said premises, if any." Mr. Boardman stated he had checked into it and there are no special assessments, but he had a problem with the City paying all the taxes on the property. Under #1, there needs to be some clarification as to whether there are any existing leases on that property. Mr. Boardman stated his major problem was in the"Addendum to Real Estate Contract". It stated in #2 that, "PUrchaser hereby agrees to assume all responsibility for meeting any requirements of any governmental authority regarding the disposition of the underground tanks installed in the property, if any." Mr. Boardman stated this would cost about $2,000. The other condition he had a problem with in the Addendum was in #3: Purchaser hereby agrees to alter and de-identify the existin4 service station upon the described premises in the following manner..." If the HRA concurs, Mr. Boardman stated he would like to write a ltter to 5tandard Oil stating the HRA and the Gity do not agree with #2 and #3 in the Addendum and see what can be worked out. Mr. Commers stated he would like the City Inspector to provide the HRA with an inspection report. So, if they are buying the land as is, at least they wil] have someone who can tell them what condition the property is in. If there are any problems that should be corrected, they should know about it. MOTION BY MR. PRAIRIE, SECQNDED BY MR. HOUCK� TO AUTHORIZE TXE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TD WRITE R LETTER TO STANDARD OIL ZN REGARD TO THE "ADDENDUM TO REAL ESTATE CONTRACT", 5TATING THAT (UNDER ITEM 2) SPANDARD OZL EITHER DROP THE PRICE OF THE PIZOPERTY RND TXE CITY WILL REMOVE THE UNDERGROUND TANKS OR COME TO A MUTUAL COMPROMISE, AND THAT ITEM 3 SHDULD BE DELETED IN ITS ENTIRETY. UPON A VOICfi VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON�CQMMERS DECLARED THfi MOTION � CARRIED uNANIMOUSLY. 5. MEMO FROM VIRGIL HERRICK, RE: PURCNASE OF CNRISTTANSON BUILDING Memo #81-15 froro Jerry Soardman to NRA on same subject and "Agreement of Cooperation Between the City of Fridley and the Fridley HRA") Mr. Boardman stated the option on the Christianson Building runs out on Ju1y 23, 1981. In the memo #81-15, he had listed three alternatives for pur- chasing the Christianson properties. He stated he is looking at an "Agreement of Cooperation between the City of Fridley and the HRA" which says: "1) That the City shall exercise said option on or before July 31, 1981, and will transfer title of said property to the HRA; 2) That the City shall document to the HRA a11 such costs and losses that they have incurred due to holding said options. These shall be submitted to the HRA no later than 30 days following the exer- eising of said option; 3) In consideration for the above transfer of title, the HRA shall agree to pay to the City of Fridley all costs incurred in exer- cising said option in addition to any losses due to the holding of said options." HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AJTHdRITY MEETING, FEBRUARY 12 1981 PAGE 6 MOTION BY MR, PRAIRI$� SECONDED BY hlR. HOUCK� TO SELECT ALTERNATIVE �l3 LISTED IN MEMO H8I-15 FOR PURCHASE OF:PROPERTY ON JULY 32,.2981� AND TNAT�THIS ALTERNRTIVL•' HE INSERTED INTO TXE"AGREEMENT OF COOPERATION BETWEEN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY AND THE HRA"�AND TO�APPROVE THE "AGRL•'EMENT OF COOPERATION BETWEEN THE Cl2Y�OF FRZDLEY AND THS HRA" WITX THAT MODIFICATION. UPON A VO.ICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHASRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � � . 6. REPORT FROM VIRGIL -iz from �erry ON CO-MINGLING Of HRA AND CI7Y FUNDS r man to HRA an Reso ution No. H-1-1981) Mr. Corrmers stated that Mr. Inman had explained this to the HRA, and they had tentativeiy approved this procedure at that time. MOTIOID BY MS. SVENASEN, SECONDED.SY MR, HOUCK, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. NRA-1-1981� "A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZZNG THE�JOZNT INVESTMENT OF HRA FUNAS WITH CITY FUNDS". UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING RYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY�. " 7. }980 YEAR END REPORT FROM SID INMAN, DIRECTOR CENTRAL SERVICES, CLERK Mr. Commers stated he was more interested in having a percentage return on a monthly average, rather than just ihe amount. We asked Mr. Boardman ta request that Mr. Inman do this. Mr. Boardman stated Mr. Inman should have no problem with that request. Mr. Boardman stated he needed approval of the check register and Resolution Na HRA-2-1981, "Ruthorizing the Payment of $24,919,86 to the City of Fridley" Mr. Commers stated he would like to have a breakdown of staff costs on a montly basis. He stated they shoutd ask Mr. Inman to attend the next HRA meeting so Mr. Inman can te17 the HRA how he is making that allocation. MOTION BY MR. HOUCK, SECONDED 8Y MS. SVENDSEN, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. HRA-2-2981., "AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT OF $Z4,9I9.86 TO THE CITY�AF FRIDLEY;'. UPON A VOSCE VOTE, ALL VPTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMODSLY. MOTION BY MR�. XOUCK, SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRSE, TO APPROVE THE CHECIC REGISTER AS PRESENSED ON FEB. 12� 1981, IN�THE AMOUNT OF $2�198,947.86. � UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CNAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, FEBRUARY 12, 1981 PAGE 7 8. PURCHASE OF VACANT PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 5760 AND 5849 3RD ST. [ C TI V� D GD Momn R� ii . � Mr. Boardman stated the primary reason for the purchase of vacant properties is because they have four eligible families who want lots. Right now they have two lots available, and they are looking at purchasing two more lots for these eligible families. The appraisal on the Jonak property (5760 - 3rd St. N.E.j came in at $14,350 and the appraisal on the Olzeske property (5849 - 3rd St. N.E.) came in at $13,900. Both owners have the 7ots for sale, and the lots are vacant. Mr. Boardman stated he was asking for authorization to go ahead and then this will close out the Large Family Program, except for the monies they get back from the sale monies on the lots. Mr. Boardman stated that on the Jonak lot, they woutd purchase at $14,350 on the condition that Mr. Jonak put in the sewer and water to make it a buildable lot. Mr. Boardman stated that Mr. Olzeske's asking price is $71,500, but the appraised value came in at $13,900. The City has to offer appraised value. Mr. Commers stated he couTd not understand why the appraiser wouTd put down a greater market value than the selling price of the lot. Mr. Boardman stated they are having review appraisats and, hopefully, the review appraisal will come in lower so they can offer a lower price. Mr. Commers stated he felt they should have an account�ng of what is actually in the Large Family account and then look at this again at the next meeting. He wouid like to see a full report of the applications. Mr. Boardman stated the main thing he is trying to accomplish is the acquisition of two more iots for the applications they have in. The builder these people are warking with has reserved 235 funds that they had requested extensions on through HUD. They cannot tie up this funding, and they cannot tie up mortgages orr that funding unless they have lots available for those people to purchase. Mr. Commers stated the problem he had with this is that the HRA had not received any prior information with which to consider what is the appropriate way to go or how Staff is thinking of using the balance of disbursement of funds. They have not been given the opportunity to consider whether they want to go on vacant lots or remove a blighted home. Mr. Boardman stated they have looked at quite a few lots in the City--some with blighted homes and some vacant lots. They have contacted a lot of people with substandard lots and vacant lots for sale, and none of the owners are interested in selling. He stated this is the on1y way available to them at this time to be able to provide housing in a short enough time to satisfy sorr�e 235 funding commitments by a developer. �� HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, FEBRUARY 12, 1987 pAGE 8 Mr. Commers stated he was not criticizing the Large Fami7y Program and the homes that have been put up. The HRA just did not have the information in advance to make this decision. MOTION BY MR. HOUCK TO APPAOVE RESOLUTIDN NO. XRA-3-2981, "A RESOLUTION BOR OFFICIRL DETERMINATION TO ACQUIRE REAL PROPERTY". � THS MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. Mr. Gommers stated there is also the problem of the Oleske appraisal at $13,900 when the asking price is $11,500. This is an unfortunate situation and one the HRA should not have to be in. Before they make a decision, they should wait for the review eppraisals. MOTION BY MR. XOUCK, SECONDED BY MS. SVENASEN, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. XRA-3-1981 FOR TNE PURCHASE OF 5760 - 3RD ST. N.E. ONLY AND TO HOLD THE PUTZCHASE OF 5849 - 3RD ST. N.E. UNTIL THE REVIEW APPRAISAL IS RECEIVED. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIXPERSON COM,�PERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANFMOUSLY. � � � 9. DISCUSSION ON THE ESTABLdSHMENT OF MOORE LAKE REDEVELOPMENT AREA an t e setting up of two tax increment finanee districts wit in the area Mr. Boardman stated they have received the go-ahead from the City Manager in just the last month. Before it could come to the HRA, they needed to have some � time to think about how it � ould be handled so Mr. Boardman could submit the information to the HRA. The City Manager and the City Council are interested in gettin9 this set up. The League of Cities has indicated that it is important to take some action on this in March prior to any possib]e legislative action on tax increment financing. Mr. Boardman reviewed the layout of the averall plan for the Moore Lake Redevelop- ment Area. However, he stated they are talking in terms of housing projects and economic development projects. As far as tax increment, they are still in the process of establishing tax increments and, hopefu7ly, by the March HRA meeting, they will have the tax increment plans available for the HRA's review. Mr- Commers stated the Commission memhers should review the Moore Lake Redeveiop- ment Plan again and be prepared to discuss this further at the next meeting. He stated he appreciated Mr. Boardman's brief overview of what is going on. Mr. Boardman stated he would prefer to hold a special meeting so he can present additional tax increment figures. If thisis feasible, he would 7ike to do this on Feb_ 26 after the filming of the program for cable TV. Mr. Commers stated they would have a special meeting on Feb. 26 after the cable 7V filming to discuss the Moore Lake Redevelopment Plan and the status of the vacant 1ot at 5849 - 3rd St. N,E. NOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, FEBRUARY 12, 1981 PA6E 9 10. CABLE TV PROGRAM Ms. 5vendsen stated she fiad talked to Mr. Loew-Bloesser, and he had indicated that 6:30 p.m. was a good time for filming. The filming will take about one hour. The filming will be done on Thursday, Feb. 26. The HRA members took about ten minutes setting up the program, which will 9nclude an introduction of r�mbers, background of the HRA, and a short sumnary of the Rehab Project, the Large Family Project, and the Center City Project. ADJOURNMENT: Chairperson Coneners declared the February 12, 1981, Housing & Redevelopment Authority meeting adjourned at 11:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ��2 ` Lynn Saba Recording Secretary : Nana�er Sdorthern Cablevision 350 63rd. Avenue Iv'E Fridley� hi^.! 5��21 11�56 Winderoere IIrive Fridley, Minr.��ota �5421 February 13, 1981 To 47hom It May Concern: In the fall of 1950 o;e uubscribed to Cable TY. At that time we took the full option of movies and the o�her channels. We we.re only offered two alterr.atives - to have the movie chazulels or not. This included t��:o movic channels - HBO and Showtime. F You can �.sagine our cha�rin ��hen c:� lost Showtime with r.o forewasnin�. Then to be told thai we would have to pay an extra £ee for that channel. We ieel that we were definitely nisled by your company. Sin�e�jely, � ,' . ��-�� Basbara Shea Copy: Fri.dley City Council Fridley Plannin� Comcnission � Pxidley Cable Televi3ion Co�ission 40 ,� -,�:. _ . � i _. _. , _ � � _ �_ � /� �" - �y�`� � , �-�; �y�� `� ___ ._ _ _ �G - � �.�.�- �- _ _ � �--..�� a,�, � �/z �—�/_ _ � - _ _ '7�+3 g �ck Q�vtck,�R� � �3� _ rZ�a�e ,c/Gt/• . �" ol�t,�s i3 ��ln�c� 6 ZY� �3cw+ r✓/�r12E � .� �r � o. t��'i� J�%�vt�t �- ��-�. �� . �� ♦ f �� / / I� � �/� , , .._r - ,g,,-,--. :.,. � . �j � a-a-a-ur ��u�-� �r.c.��. _ �d-�-cQ-c,�h.. ��i`'1�-2. __ _ _ __'� _ _ _�=-� �. -��__ '� ° - �' ��# - �- . - ,�� «�,�.._ ' (o � �� _ � �.v �arz�, �� D� 6//� G�.�r�e,�� f{a� � a a 9 _CY�� e � C�;� � o � s{ �� 7�� Z�7 �it�� 1�� ^��e��- ��/7 ��-� � � �- _ �/ �/ �� p�� -�J,E — _ i��o -�. G'��,� ,P�h/ . i s�c�o �-�. ��-k '2�P ryI �. �//� G<-��o�C y� Z z 9�..,.�-.�� S a o o�,,, e CO e e. k � i��. °`�"`�Q,�-�-.�- i�, . / � , / 1 ` CALL TO ORDER: CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 25, 1981 Chairman Harris called the February 25, 1981, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present Members Absent Mr. Harris, Mr. Treuenfels, Ms. Schnabel, Mr. Svanda, Mr. Oquist, Ms. Hughes, Mr. Wharton None Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner Bill Deblon, Associate Planner Kathleen Callahan, League of Minnesota Cities Thomas Brickner, 6249 Ben More Drive David Harris, 470 Rice Creek Blvd. See attached list APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 4, 1981, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION SY MR. TREUENFELS, SECONDED BY M12. SVANDA, TO APPROVE TXE FEBRUARY 4, I98Z, PI,ANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, RLL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN NARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSED NOISE ORDINANCE ��,. MOTION BY MS. HUGHES, SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HERRING ON THE CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSED NOISE ORDINANCE. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:35 P.M. Mr.-Boardman stated the Noise Ordinance was discussed at the last two Planning Commission meetings. He stated tt�at Ms. Kathleen Callahan of the League of Minnesota Cities was in the audience. Ms. Callahan, Mr. Deblon, and himself would be glad to answer any questions the Commission might have. Ms. Schnabel stated that on agenda page 16, under Section 124.04 Central Air Conditioning Equipment, how do Fridley residents know they are required to get approval from the City before installing central air conditioning units? Mr. Deblon stated that under the current State Building Code, a permit is required for any electrical or heating, and the City has adopted that State Code. When a permit is obtained for any electrical or heating, this requirement could be enforced. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 25, 1951 PAGE 2 Ms. Callahan stated that most central air conditioning units are still put in by contractors, and contractors are usually very conscientious about a City's rules and regulations and usually don't get the citizens into problems. The problem exists when the resident purchases an air conditioning unit from a store and installs it himself. She stated that when a City adopts new legislation, she usually recommends that the City utilize ways to a7ert the citizens to these new pieces of legislation, such as a community newsletter, Welcome Wagon, newspaper, or alert key vendors in the community--whatever system works best for the community. Ms. Schnabel asked if it was possible that the noise levels of the newer air conditioning units are of a lower frequency that is not as annoying as the older models, and did Ms. Cal7ahan foresee in the future that the newer units would be quiet enough so as not to cause a disturbance and an ordinance such as this would not even be necessary? Ms. Callahan stated that no matter how quiet an air conditioning unit is, there is always the situation where the unit is adjacent to a neighboring bedroom window or another window. There will always be problems when houses are close together. She stated that Ms. Schnabel was correct in that the newer models are getting quieter. However, she doubted they would ever get to the point where the City would not want this requirement. Ms. Schnabel asked if Mr. Herrick, the City Attorney, had reviewed this proposed Noise Ordinance. Mr. Deblon stated that Mr. Herrick and Mr. Carl Newquist, City Prosecutor, had received copies of the Noise Ordinance to review. He stated the Commission had a copy of a letter from Mr. Newquist regarding the Noise Ordinance that should be received into the record. MOTION BY MR. WHARTON, SECONDED BY MS. SCHNABEL, TO RECEIVE INTD THE RECORD A LETTfiR FROM CARL NEWQUIST, CITY PROSECUTOR, REGARDING THE PROPOSED NOISE ORDINANCE. Ms. Schnabel asked what Mr. Deblon's reaction was to Mr. Newquist's statement that he feels the ordinance is somewhat redundant and already exists in some of the other city codes? Mr. Deblon stated his reaction was that they should �ite that, and in some S��ti+Rns they have �ited the fact that these already exist e7sewhere in the code and have cross referenced. Mr. Newquist still fe}t it was redundant and had suggested that Staff get an opinion from the City Attorney as far as cite and cross referencing other things in the code. Ms. Hughes stated that redundance is perhaps not required in a lot of instances, but if she thought the problem was being taken care of and enforced in other codes, she would not even support this kind of an ordinance. Her major complaint is with the noise levels. Mr. Newquist's letter sounds as though they could practically junk the whole ordinance. She stated that maybe they should ��st be making sure that every ordinance in the City is enforced. os�e ay pa�e;s aH •a�enbapeu� a�e s6u�y� ay� �o auws pue `a�a�dwo�u� ��ensn si �s�� ay� `s6u�y; 6u «s�� ;ae;s Fay� uayM •s��w�� 2uo��e�adp gp•tiZ� uo��aS u� „s}uawa�dwI aaMOd �oop3np„ �0 6u��s<< ay� o� pa��aCqo ay pa�e�s s��eH •aW •�uawn�op a43 u� as�a a�aymFue pa�uaaa�aa �ou si uosaad }ey� se pa3a�ap aq p�noys „�a��o �o��uo� asiou„ aao}a�ay3 9„�a��o �oa�uo� as�ou„ e o� aauaaa;aa aay�an; ou s� aaay� pa}e;s ayg •„�a��}�p �oa�uo� asioN ay� }o sa��np pue s�aMOd„ `80'bZl uo��as °g� a6ed epua6e o� pa��a�a� �aqauu�5 •sW •auo�au axa oaNr aanra�ax xsssa7 S,SSIf2ZSM3N '2IW Q32ITt7J3Q SIXXTtH N�WXIKHJ '3dFi JNISOd 77ff '.'3,LOA 3JZOd it NOdl1 •�'s�ou �snC aae �ey� sa��,�ed ay� pue ��npuo� �'t,�ap,�os�p s� aaay�. aaaynt sa��.ed ay� uaaM�aq a�uaaa}��p e st a,aay� �.�a} ays pa�p�s ayg suoi�an��s �o spu�� asoy} a�r�na��e o; 3a6 ue� �'ay� �oo� Fue paau pue uo��en��s ;o pu�� s�y�. uo a�puey e aney Fay� �aa� �,uop sa�3�� soW •o� puodsa,� p�noys �uaw -�.,�edap a�i�od ay� 6u�y�.auros aq �y6�w s�y� pa3e�s ayS •MOU 3yfi�,� �.� y��M wa�qoad �'ue pe4 ��}� a43 �1u�4� �ou P6P a4 Pa�E35 Pp4 aH '(90'bZ� uo��aas u� � wa�.i) „s6u�aay�eg ,�o sa��,aed �'sioN„ y}�M wa�qo.�d e pey �s�nbmaN '.�W Pa�e�s Upl{p��E+� 'S�nJ •uoi;sanb �uaaa}}tip ft�a�o� e s} �uatun�op ay� u� s�uam �'a�p�.tj ;o F}�� ay�. �eym si s�y� aay;ayM 'aanaMOH •;uawn�op poo6 e y��M dn ame� �'ay� �aa} �'ay� pue aw�� 6uo� e a��nb ,�o� s�'au.�o��e }o .+aqwnu 2 l��.LM a�ueu�p.�o s�y� uo pa�,�oM �'ay� pa�e�s ayS •sa�ues�nu ��qnd se am�� }o peaye sa�3��uap� Fa�p�,�� }o F�.�� ay� �ey� SUOL��E ��i�ads pa��uap� �'ay� °a�ues�nu a��qnd e se fiu�y��'ue a�eu6�sap ue� �ey; a6en6u�� a�e�s a�dw�s uo F�a�a uey� ,�ay�ea •,��e� s� �Bl{� �ClM a�qpuosea,� e u� a�.�o�ua F�� ay� sd�ay �ey� �.uamn�op e a�eaa� o� 6u��fa� a�,e fayl •�uawa�,�o;ua Me� anL�.e�L�uenb op o� alqissodwi F��en;,��n �.� puno� aney sa�;�� 3sow a�ayM suo��en;�s aae asay� °pa�s�� a.�e �'ay� �feM ay� �'q aan32u u� an6pn �'aan aae asay� a��yn+ �ey� pa�.e�s ayS '90'bZL uo��aS `„sas�oN a�uesinp ��qnd„ay� �noqe su,aa�uo� p�y �s�nbmaN •,�� pa�e�.s UEl{p��E� 'SW •wpa6oad �uawa�ao�ua ue �ae�s �'ay} �� a�uaaa�aa �'q way� a��s sa�� soW •way�. a�,�o}ua ao a�ua�a�a,a Fq way} �dope Fay� aay;ayM `£0'bZl uo��as aapun „s��m�� as�oµ a��iya� ,�o;ow„ay� daa� p�noys h'ay� �u�y� ptp ays pa�.e�s 42I�E��E� 'S�,J •uo aa�e� pasn aq ue� pue� Moy �o anss� ay� o� �eads os�e Fay� �nq °MOU pasn 6u�aq s� pue� moy }o anss� ay; o� �eads �'�uo �ou op Fay� `��aM se apo� 6u�uoZ ay; u� aq p�noys spaepue�s ay�. a��yM �ey� pa�e�s ueye��e� •sW •apo� 6u�uoZ ay� u� �nd aq p�noys pue sp�epue�s 6u�uoz �'�uo F��ea,� a.ae �'ay� 6u��u�y�. s�y sem �I •a�ueu�p,�o ay} �o „s�n6„ an�}e;��.uenb ay� a,�e 4�L1{M `ZO'bZL uoi��as `„sp,�epue�S as� pue� 6uin�a�aa„ ay� �noqe u,�a�uo� e pey �s�nbMaN •,�W pa�e�s UEl{2�(2� 'SW 'apew uaaq Fpea,��e pey sa6uey� asoy�. �o awos �.y6noy� ays pue °a�e�adoadde a.�aM paaa6e uo�qa4 •aW pue ays ',aa�;a� ay} ui pa�sa66ns �s�nbmap •,�W s6u�y� ay� }o awos ��e ;e a�ueuip�o s,anBea� ay�. ;ou s� a�ueu�pao s,�'a�p�,�j pue a�ueu�p,�o �apom ay� ,�o��e� o} 6u��',�� aat� Buo� e 3uads uo�qaQ •,�w pue ays pa�.e�s ays •�s<< �'aaaoa6 e�o pu��{ s� l�JL4M °a�ueu�pao �apow ,sai�.►� e�osauu�W ;o an6ea� ay� �e pa�.�a,a �p a�aM s� uawwo� s, � s�nbmaN •,�W ;o Fuem �.ey� ;�a; ays pa� e�s UEI�E �(B� ' SW £ 39tld 186L 5Z A2ftlfib83� `9NI133W NOISSIWWO� 9NINNHId •�e��ua� SLL9 �E pa�e�o� ��e�aua6 eaae 6ui��aMp ��E `£ ��oLB `L 30� ;o }e�daa e 6u�a8 ZO-L8# 'S'd ltlld AatlNIWIl3ad �3SOd '3'N anuany �e��ua� 3o ap�s �se3 ay} uo ue� a�6u�s e`uo «�pptl SLL�H a�e� a�ooW d V �0 NOI1da34I5N0� �9NI .Z •a�snowrr�rtnrn QS72iXHJ NOISOW 3H�L Q3XTt7J,'3Q SIXXfiH NfIWXIBH� '3dH `JNISOA 22H '3TAd 3JIOA S NOdl2 'dS7QI?I3 30 dSIJ SHS 2703 SJNFfNIQ2l0 SSION Q.3SOd02id 3H,L NO NOISSl1JSIQ 3l1NI.LNOJ OS 'SSIllbO '?IhT dS Q3QNOJSS 'S3H9l1H 'SW dH NOIJAh' ��uno� �C�� o} uo puauuw�aa o� uo�ssimwo� Buiuue�d ay�. a�� p�noM }�e�s w,�o� ay� aney p�nom uo�ss�wwo� 6u�uue�d ay� os sa6uey� ay; ��e y��M a�ueu�pap as�oN ay� 30 uo�saan pa�epdn ur aney 0� �}2�.5 �SB o� a�� p�noM ays �epua6r ay; uo ��EG sawo� s�y� a.io}a8 •a�ueu�pao s�y� y��M op o� 6u�F,�� '��eaa a,�e Fay� ;eyM s� �ey�. pue `u� an�� o� a�doad ao; F�.�unuwo� a��u 2 S�UBM F�� ay�. �ou ao .�ay�ayM ;o ase� E SEM �L °s�y; a�� a�ueuip,�o uE y�iM �Ey�.,�ay o�. pawaas �.� pa�e�.s say6nH •sw •a�ueu�pao s�y� �noqe y�dap u� ��,�,�aH •,�W o� ��e� o� a�� p�noM ay pa�.e�s aH '3uawa�,�o3ua ,ALp� pUp �enba s� a�ueu�p,�o a�oyM ay� y;�M sey ay wa�qoad aoCem ay; pa�.e�.s s�,�,aeH •a� •6u�y�Fue a�ao�ua }ODU2� �'ay� °a�ueu�p,�o ay} �noy��M •�uawa�,�o;ua ,�o�. �oo} e s� �� nq °a�,�o;ua o� p,�ey aq �y6�w a�ueu�p,�o ay3 pa;e�s �s�nbp •aW • a7snowrNttnrn aartrx�t� Norsow strs a��sa s2uuxx t�wurtttr� �aax �n�zson z7x '3SOA S�IOA rr Noan 'SO-DZI NOISJ,3S NI „SSN3h'37dW2 2i3MOd 2IOOQSf10 'Z# h�3SI h'0273 „SI?IXQ„ 30 NOIS323Q 3HS QN3WI�0�321 OS '23HFINHJS 'SW Iff QSQNOJSS 'S3HJIIH 'SW ,iH NOITAW •saw�� u�e�.aa� 6u�anp }snC °F�a.�i�ua ;uawd�nba ,aaMOd �o as�ay�. 6u�;��,��sa,� ao 6u��a�� }ou s� ;I •sanoy u�e�aa� 6u�,�np as�ou uo �oa;uo� e 6u�;�nd s� s�.�m�� auo��eaadp ayl •s�uawa�dwE aaMOd aoop�no �o ;s�� ay� y�.�M wa�qoad a aney p�p ay ;nq '„s��w�� euoi�.e,�adp„ y�.�M wa�qo,�d e aney �.ou p�p ay pa�p�s �s�nbp •aw e,� ua umo 6u� aads uos.�ad a °a dwexa ,�o ° �w�p 00�9 �p anuany l 3 � P P y� L � l{J�B� 0� F�L�LqpdLJ ;uawa�ao�ua a43 aney �ou saop R}�� ay; }ey� s� s�43 y��m wa�qo.�d ay� pa�e3s s�a.�eH •.�W •�f�ua8y �oa�uo� uo��n��o� ay� ,Cq p�ay ,fan,ans pue sis�f�EUe ue wo.�} amE� saw « asayl •uo uo�s��ap e a�ew p�noys ��uno� �}�� pue uo�ss�wwo� 6u�uueld ay� 6u�y�. ;o pu�� ay� s� �ey� pue `a,aay �}o-apea� e s� aaayl •uo��e�ndod u� �'�}suap a43 �o asne�aq a�e�,�doudde spM •w•e 00�6 �La3 uo�6uiwoo�g pue °�ned '�S 's��odeauu�w }o F�� ayl •anssi �0 PUL� �pJO� B SBM SLI��. PB�p�S UEl{p��p� •sW •a�qeuosea,a fiuiaq }ou sem s�'ep<<oy pue spua�aam uo 'a•d 00�6 o� '�u'e 00�6 �46noy� aH •sanoy Ma;,�n� ay�. y�.�M wa�qo�d p PEI� b 39tld 1861 `5Z AaVf12183� `9NI133W NOISSIWWO� 9NINNHId PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. FEBRUARY 25. 1981 PAGE 5 MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA, TO OPEN TXE PUBLIC HSARING ON PRfi'LIMINARY PLAT, P.S. #81-02, BY THOMAS BRICKNER. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRSS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:37 P.M. Mr. Boardman stated this property is off Old Central, just north of Woody Lane. This used to be church-owned property, and the church is interested in selling. Mr. Brickner has a contract for purchasing the property based on approval of the plat. He stated Mr. Brickner is in the audience. Mr. Boardman stated that Mr. Brickner is proposing a road that comes in off Central Avenue and ends in a cul-de-sac. The reason he is proposing at this time is he is attempting to save as much vegetation as possible. He either plans to move the existing house on to one lot or tear the house down. The City's overall plans for improvement of this area, when development does come, will be some connection from Ben More Drive to this road system. Mr. Boardman stated that all the lots are acceptable and are all over 9,000 sq. ft. Some are 90 ft. lots and are 85 ft, lots. Mr. Brickner is planning on huilding very nice homes on those lots. Mr. Tan Brickner, 6249 Ben More Drive, stated he lives in this area. He stated he would be glad to answer any questions the Commission might have. Mr. Ralph Skinner, 6217 Central Ave., stated his property abuts this area to the north, and he is perfectly in agreement with Mr. Brickner as far as the development of this area. There is a lot of property lying there that is not being utilized, and this development will be very advantageous to both the people who live in this area and to the City. Mr. Walter Rydberg, 6127 Woody Lane, stated he and three other people in the audience own property that abuts this property on the southern end. They are concerned about the terrain and the big tall pine trees that might have to be removed. Mr. William Gagner, 6125 Woody Lane, stated he lives next to Mr. Rydberg. He is concerned a6out the grading and the natural grade. Mr. Brickner stated there was no doubt that this is a difficult piece of ground to work with. He is certain7y going to try to save as many trees and preserve the beauty of the area the best he can. There is going to be some unusual construction, and each home will be custom-designed to fit each lot. Mr. Skinner stated that with regard to Mr. Brickner`s developing ability, he is acquainted with what Mr. Brickner has done. He stated he is very confident in Mr, Brickner's past performance, and Mr. Brickner will not do anything in the neighborhood except to benefit and create an environment and an atmosphere that wi17 be advantageous to every home owr�er in the area and to the City of Fridley. He builds the finest and develops in such a way that the houses look as though they grew out of the ground instead of being put together. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 25, ]981 PAGE 6 Mr. Harris asked who would maintain the ponding area, the City or the property ownersl He stated that with all the ponding areas the City requires for new development, someone should figure out how much it costs the City to maintain these ponding areas each year. Mr. Boardman stated they could extend the property line and just retain a drainage easement and have the property owners maintain the ponding area. Mr, Harris stated he liked that idea better. Ms. Schnabel suggested that the lot line of the lot next to the ponding area be moved over, and that lot split in half to make an additional buildable lot. Mr. Boardman stated that maybe Mr. Brickner could work it out with another buildable lot so that the drainage easement went across all three of those lots. This is something Mr. Brickner is going to have to look at �hen he gets his final plat. MOTION BY MR. OQUSST, SECONDED BY MR. SVRNDA� TO CIASE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON PRELZMINARY PLAT, P.S. #8.Z-02� BY THQMA5 BRICKNER. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTSNG AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRZS DECLARED THE PU&LIC HEARING CIASSD AT 9:28 P.M. MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECO:VDED BY MR. SVANDA, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF PROPOSED PRELIhtINARY PLRT� P.S. ji81-02� HEATHER HILLS WEST� BY THOMAS BRICKNER: BEING A REPLAT OF IAT I, BLOCK 3, MDORE LAKE HILLS ADDITION, A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ARfiR GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF CENTRAL RVE. N.E. AT 6175 CENTRAL, 5UBJECT TO ENGIN&ERIN��STANDARAS FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF- WAY AND RNY NfiCESSARY ENGINEERING EASEMENTS WITHiN THE PLAT. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRSS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Boar�nan stated the final plat will go to City Council for setting a public hearing on March 16, and will go to City Council for a public hearing on April 13. 3. LOT SPLIT REQU_EST, L.S. #81-01, BY THOMAS BRICKNER: Split off the East 300 feet of Lot 9, A3itor a Su�idivision No.�the same being 6229 Central Avenue N.E. Mr. Boardman stated this request was also by Mr. Brickner. This lot is located north of the proposed plat. Mr. Brickner does have a purchase agreement from the owner of the property to split off the 300 feet of the lot. If the Planning Commission and City Council approve the lot split, Mr. Brickner will purchase the property. Mr. Boardman stated that if the Planning Cott�nission does approve the lot split, he would recommend a stipulation that this lot not be built upon until it gains access from the south or from Ben More Drive and built only in a manner consistent with further development of that area. Otherwise, he would recommend denial. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 25, 1981 PAGE 7 Mr. Brickner stated he had no problem with that stipulation. He stated he would not even ask for a building permit the way Ben More Drive is right now. Ms. Hughes stated the property owner had not signed the lot split application, only Mr. Brickner had signed it. She stated the Planning Commission could recomnend on the lot split, but before it goes to City Council, the property owner should sign the application along with the fee owner. Ms. Hughes stated she had no prob7em with this lot split request if they can limit the building on the lot. There certainly needs to be some platting in order to qet the best use out af the property. MOTION BY MS. HUGHE5, SECONDED BY MR. TREUENFELS, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. �81-OZ, BY THOMRS SRICKNER: SPLIT OFF THE EAST 300 FEET OF LOT 19, AUD720R'S SUBDIVISION NO. 22, THE 5AME BEING 6229 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E., WITH THE FOLIAWING TWO STIPULATIONS: I. THAT NO BUILDING TAKE PLACE ON THIS PROPERTY UNTIL THE PROPERTY IS SERVICED DIRECTLY BY A PUBLIC STREET. 2. TXAT THE PROPERTY OWNER SIGN THE LOT SPLIT APPLICATION. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #81-02, BY A& R{DAVID HARRIS): Split off the ort 233 feet af the West 230 feet of the NE of the NW 1/4 lying East of Highway No. 65, subject to the rights of the public over the North 33 feet and over the West 20 feet therefor for highway and driveway purposes, subject to easement from East 5 feet to NSP, subject to road easement to Viron Realty, From the West 600 feet of the North 330 feet of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4, Section 12, to make City records agree with County records, the same being 7699 Uiron Road, N.E. (Frostop) Mr. Boardman stated this is the same problem they have had in the past. The County records lot splits without getting the lot splits approved by the City. He stated this property is located on Osborne Road and Highway 65. The property that is split at the record of the County is the Frostop, so that the taxes were split up, but special assessments were not split up, because the lot split was never approved by the City of Fridley. He stated Mr. Dave Harris is asking that this split be approved by the City so that all the special assessments on his record are clear. Mr. Boardman stated that the County is proposing a street improvement al] the way from University Ave. to O1d Centra7. The County is planning some inter- section improvements, and this area is one of those intersection improvements. There are problems right now with access and entrance onto Viron Rd., because it comes in on an intersection. That whole area is going to be a center line median, therefore, there will be no access to Viron Road at the north end. The City is looking at their normal loopback system which will provide a loop around the corner property. In order to do this, they need right-of-way dedication. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, fEBRUARY 25, 19$1 PAGE 8 Mr. Boardman stated they have talked to Mr. Dave Harris and the owner of the Frostop about this lot split. The owner of the Frostop is proposing within the next two years to construct a small office facility on this location. The property is presently zoned C2-S. It is Staff's recommendation that when the owner comes in for a building permit to start construction, he be asked to rezone that property to C-2. With this portion of dedication for right-of-way, the City will deed back to him a portion of Viron Road. The City is looking at a 60 ft. right-of-wa , of which a portion of that right-of-way will be taken from A & R (Dave Harris�. Mr. Dave Harris stated he thought this was a housekeeping kind of thing, and he really felt they were talking about two different things: (1) the lot split; and (2) the intersection and road control. Mr. Harris stated that when the building permit was granted in 1963, in effect, the City did create a lot split. Last year when he went back to correct the survey on the property, it was determined that this property was not part of the whole nine acres that was in existence at the time, because the County had taken the split and recorded it. The City had not done this, so he has been paying the other property's assessments since 1964 as part of the property he had retained. Now the City is proposing to put in another road or loopback system, so virtually, he would be paying for that road all over again. He stated that back in 1970, when t6e City came in and did some improvements, it was asked if the City would put in a loopback system, and the City was not willing to do it at that time. So, this is a complete change. He paid for it once, he should not have to pay for it a second time. Mr. Harris stated that was a separate issue, and the issue here tonight is to do some housekeeping and bookkeeping to make that 1ot split not subject to conditions of this road. It virtually has been split and operating since 1964. It is unfortunate that the City did not catch this sooner, Mr. Harris stated he is willing to work with the City on traffic control, but he did not care for the way things have been laid out at this point. He was not in a position to agree to the loopback until the lot split is approved. Mr. Boardman stated that before the lot split is approved, he would like a condition on it that Mr. Dave Harris work with the City to come to some equitable agreement for road right-of-way. (Mr. Wharton left the meeting at 10:15 p.m.) MOTION BY MS. HUGHES TO CONTINUE LOT SPLIT REQUEST� L.S. #82-02, BY R& R {DAVE HARRIS). � THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. Mr. Harris stated he objected to Mr. Boardman's recomnended stipulation. The City is givirtg more back to the owner of the Frostop than he is giving up. He stated he was giving up more. He felt the Planning Commission should grant the lot split, and then they can start from zero on the road right-of-way agreement. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 25, 1981 PAGE 9 Mr. Boardman stated that should st�ll be a condition so that when this goes to City Council, they will have the road worked out between Mr. Harris and the owner of the Frostop. MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MR. TREUSNFELS, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF IAT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. k81-02, BY A& R(DAVID HARRIS) TO SPLIT OFF THE NORTH 233 FEET OF THE WEST 230 FEET OF THE NE 2/9 OF THE NW 1/4 LYING EAST OF HIGHWAY NO. 65, SUBJECT TO THE RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC OVER THE NORTH 33 FEfiT AND OVER THE WEST 20 FEET THEREFOR FOR HIGHWAY AND DRIVEWAY PURPOSES, SUSJECT TO EASEMENT OVER EAST 5 FEET TO NSP, SUBJECT TO ROAD EASEMENT TO VIRON REALTY� FROM THE WEST 600 FEET OF TXE NORTH 330 FEET OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW�2/4, SECTIDN 12� TO MAKE CZTY RECORD5 AGREE WITH COUNTY RECORDS� THE SAME BEING 7699 VIRON ROAD N.E. (FR0.STOP), WTTH NO STIPULATIONS. Ms. Hughes stated she felt this was the wrong thing to do until they get some commitment on the street matter because of the City's responsibilities in terms of public health, safety, and welfare. UPON R VOICE VOTE, HARRI5, TREUENFEIS, SCHNABEL, SVANDA, AND OQUIS2 VOTING RYE, HUGHES VOTING NAY, CHAIRMAN XAR.RIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. 5. RECEIVE JANUARY 27, 1981, ENER&Y COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. HUGHSS� SE'CONDED BY MR. TREUENFELS� TO RECEII�E' THE JAN. 27� 1981� ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE vOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CfIAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED TiIE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � . - � � - - :�� . - ■� , � � - �.. . �� r �. MOTION BY MR. TRfiUENFELS� SECONDED BY MS. SCHNABEL� TO RECEIVE THE FEB. 5, I981, HUMAN RESOURCSS COMMISSION MINUTSS. � UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. RECEIVE FEBRUARY 10, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MR. SVANDR, TO RECEIVE THE FEB. I0, 1981, COMMUNITY DSVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES. Mr. Oquist stated that the Community Development Commission has proposed an ordinance for licensing condominium conversions. They cannot prevent condo conversion, but they are trying to be assured that the City is notified when there is a plan to convert. Mr. Oquist stated the Commission had requested that Mr. Herrick clarify paragraphs 3 and 4 of Mr. Herrick's Jan. 23, 1981, rr�mo regarding condo conqersion licensing ordinance. Mr. Oquist stated that Mr. Deblon had written a memo dated Feb. 20 clarifying Mr. Herrick's paragraphs, but Mr. Oquist stated these sounded like Mr. Deblon's opinions and not Mr. Herrick's. He stated he was not willing to accept Mr. Deblon's explanation. PLANNIN6 COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 25, 1981 PAGE 10 Mr. Boardman stated he would recommend this item be continued until they get Mr. Herrick's clarification. This will be put on the Planning Comnission agenda as a regular agenda item. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN H�IRRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRISD UNRNIMOUSLY. 8. RECEIVE FEBRUARY 10, 1981, APPEALS COhA1ISSI0N MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. SCHNABEL, SECONDED BY MR. TREUENFELS, TO RECEIVE TXS FEB. 10, 1981, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRI5 DECLAHED THE MOTIDN CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 9. RECEIUE FEBRUARY 11, 1981, PARKS & RECREA7ION COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. HUGHES� SECONDE'D BY M5. SCHNRBEL� TO RECEIVE THE FEB. 1I� 1981, PARKS & RECREATION COMMTSSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HRRRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 10. RECEIVE FEBRUARY 12, 1981, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MS. SCHNABEL, TO RECEIVE THE FSB. 12, 198I, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES. Mr. Boardman stated that in regard to the Moore Lake Redevelopment Area, this would again be on the P7anning Commission agenda on March 4. In the establish- ment of a redevelopment district, they are going to need a resolution passed by the Planning Commission that says these redevelopment plans are consistent with the Comprehensive P7an for the City of Fridley. Mr. Boardman reviewed the layout of the overall plan for the Moore Lake Redevelop- r�nt Area. He stated the Planning Commission will be receiving a copy of the redevelopment plan and the tax increment plan prior to the next meeting. He stated they are looking at the establishment of this district by the end of March. Mr. Boardman stated that in setting up a redevelopment district and a tax increment district, the City is required to talk to the taxing jurisdictions, but they have no authority over the action taken by the City Council. He stated he will be talking to the Dist. 13 School Board on March 13, the Dist. 14 School Board on March 17, and the County on March 10. UPON A VOICE VOTE, RLL VOTING AYE, CHRIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 25, 1981 PAGE 11 11. CONTINUE�: PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY MOTION BY MS. SCHNABEL, SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST, TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE AMENDNIENT TO-CXAPTBR ZOS OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHRIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED 12. OTHER BUSINESS: A. Receive letter from Barhara Shea, dated February 13, 1981 (A copy of a letter sent'to Northern Cablevision) MOTION BY MR. TREUSNFELS, SECONDED BY MS. SCHNABEL, TO RECEIVE A LETTER FROM BARBARA SHEA DRTED F&BRUARY 23� I981. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANYMOU5LY. B. Letter from Cliff Ash, Chairperson of the Charter Commission Mr. Harris stated that the Charter Commission is in need of 5-6 new members. He stated if anyone was interested in serving on the Charter Commission, or if the Commission members knew of anyone interested in serving, they could contact Mr. Ash. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MS. SCHNABEL� SECONDb'D BY MR. TRSUENFELS� TO AA70URN THE MEETING. UPON R VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE FEBRUARY 25, 2981, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AA70URNED AT 11:35 P.M. Respectfully ubmitted, L ne Saba Recording Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 25, 1981 PAGE 12 NAME Walter R. Rydberg George Leich Rick Brickner Donna Gorski Scott Kohanek Mark Bue William Gagner George R. Skinner W. Jane Skinner Lars Adolphson Dorothy Miles Ervin A. Kassow Dorothy Welch Judith Myrlie ►:n�� 6127 Woody Lane N.E. 2939 Girard 1233 - 72th Ave. N.W. 6245 Ben More Drive 6116 Central Ave. N.E. 6229 Central Ave. N.E. 6125 Woody Lane N.E. 6217 Central Ave. N.E. 6217 Ceniral Ave. N.E. 6137 Woody Lane N.E. 1370 Rice Creek Rd. N.E. 1440 Rice Creek Rd. N.E. 6115 Woody Lane N.E. 820 Lone Oak Rd., Eagan, Mn. (owner of 6229 Central) PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 25, 1981 NAME Watter R. Rydberg George Leich Rick Brickner Donna Gorski Scott Kohanek Mark Bue William Gagner George R. Skinner W. Jane Skinner Lars Adolphson Dorothy Miles Ervin A. Kassow Dorothy Welch Judith Myrlie ADDRESS � IL PAGE 12 6127 Woody Lane N.E. 2939 Girard 1233 - 12th Ave. N.W. 6245 Ben Mare Drive 6116 Central Ave. N.E. 6229 Central Ave. N.E. 6125 Woody Lane N.E. 6217 Central Ave. N.E. 6217 Central Ave. N.E. 6137 Woody Lane N.E. 1370 Rice Creek Rd. N.E. 1440 Rice Creek Rd. N.E. 6115 Woody Lane N.E. 820 Lone Oak Rd., Eagan Mn. (owner of 6229 Centralj