The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 06/03/1981 - 6758PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: City of Fridley AGENDA WEDNESDAY, JUNE 3, 1981 APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION DIINUTES: MAY 6, 1981 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 7:30 P.M. PAGES 1 - 10 -08, 11 - 16 BY PETER A. EISENLlMMEN: �er 5ection ZUb.Ubl, Z, N, or tne Fridley City Code, to allow the construction of a second accessory builidng, a 26 ft. by 28 ft. detached garage on Part of Lot 8C, Second Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 21, the same being 6535 Oakley Drive N.E. 2. LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #81-05, BY CHARLES E. J�HANSON: Split Lot 10 in two to make two building sites; Lot 9 and North 1/2 of Lot 10, Block 6, Fridley Park, the same being 6570 H ckory Street N.E., and Lot 11, and South Half nf Lot 7�,Block 6, fridley Park, the same being 6550 Hickory Street N.E. 3. RECEIYE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: MAY 7, 1981 4. RECEIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES: MAY 12, 1981 N7 ,;� � 7 RECEIVE APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MAY 12, 1981 RECEIVE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: MAY 13, 1981 RECEIVE HOUSING & RE�EVELOPMEP:T AUTHORITY MINUTES: MAY 4 1981 8. OTHER BUSINESS: ADJOURNMENT: 17 - 21 SALMON PINK YELLOW GREEN WHITE CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION F4EETING, MAY 6, 1981 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Harris called the May 6, 1987, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:34 p.m. I��]��iL1� Members Present: Mr. Harris, �4s. Gabel, Mr. Svanda, Mr. Oquist, Ms. Hughes, Ms. van Dan, Mr. Wharton Members Absent: None Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner John Doyle, 6305 East River Road Ray P;rice, 77 - 75th 4Jay N.E. James Fisher, 45 - 75th Way N.E. Robert Varhol, 55 - 75th Way N.E. Jan Dean, 65 - 75th Way N.E. APPROVAL Of APRIL 22, 1981, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. VRN DAN, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO�APPROVE THE APRIL 22� 1981, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOiCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIfZMAN HRRRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. TABLED: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #81-06, BY EIG INVESTMENTS, INC.: Per Section 20 ,05 , 3, D, of tile Fri3ley City Code, to allow the construction of a duplex in R-1 zoning (single family dwelling areas) on Lot 3, Block 1, Leigh Terrace, the same being 31 Osborne Way N.E. MOTION BY MR. OQUSST� SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA, TO REMOVE THE REQUEST FOR R SPECIRL USE PERMIT� SP k81-06� BY LEIGH INVESTMENTS� INC.� FROM THE TABLE. UPON.A VOICE VOTE, RLL VOTING AYE� CHRIRMAN HARRTS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOfISLY. MOTIDN BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST� TO REOPEN TXE PUBLIC HEARING ON SP A`8.2-06 BY LEIGH��INVESTMENTS� INC. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED Tf1E PUBLIC HEARING REOPENED AT 7:40 P.M. . . PLANfJING C0��1MISSION MEETING, MAY 6, 1981 PAGE 2 �r. Boardman stated that at the last meeting, the Planning Commission tabled this request and requested the petitioner to come back with a redesign of the structure. He stated Mr. Doyle, the petitioner, was in the audience to answer questions. He stated this new design meets the 3-stall requirement. Mr. Doyle stated that the new plan was redesigned to provide the 3-stall require- ment. Actually, there is a stall and one-half on one side and two stalls on the other side. He again explained that the reason for requesting this special use permit is because on two separate occasions, they have had single family homes sold on that corner lot, and both times the lenders were reluctant to pro- vide financing. The lenders did not feel that corner was the proper location for a single family home. He stated he is planning on doing some fencing along East River Road to provide a buffer to this property. Mr, Harris asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak to this item. Mr. Robert Varhol, 55 - 75th Way N.E., stated Mr. Doyle has two houses in that area already. If he puts in another house, it will create a fire hazard as the houses are too close together. tie has one house that has been there for two years and hasn't been sold yet. Ms. Jan Dean, 65 - 75th Way N.E., stated it seemed strange that financing was impossible to get for a single family dwelling because of the noxious fumes and heavy traffic on East River Road, and instead of one family being subjected to those conditions, it seemed preferable to put two families in there. She stated when Mr. Doyle purchased this property, he knew East River Road was there with its various problems. The lot is very small and did not meet the minimum code requirements for what is needed to build a duplex. At the last Planning Commission meeting, there was some discussion about the fact that the St. Paul Waterworks property in the back could be considered part of this property and would meet the lot requirements. She showed the Planning Commission pictures she had taken of the lot. Mr. Ray Price, 77 - 75th tday N.E., stated he was against the duplex. He stated there is already a little white house with a garage larger than the house, a 7arge brown house, and now Mr. Doyle wants to squeeze in a duplex for two families. Mr. Jim Fisher, 45 - 75th Way N.E., stated he lives right across the street from this lot. After I�r. Doyle puts in a fence, there is going to be only about 10 ft. from the front door to the fence. The big brown house has no yard. He thouqht it would be a blight to the neighborhood to try to jam another building into this small area. Any people visiting that duplex would have to park in front of their homes as there would not be any room to park on the lot. Mr. Doyle stated he is before the PTanning Commission with a speciai use permit request. The lot is a buildable lot. Ne did not know what bearing the other houses has on this project. He is trying to work with the neighborhood to build PLAP�NIP�G COMMISSION MEETIPJG, MAY 6, 19i31 PAGE 3 something that is going to look nice in the neighborhood, but he is having trouble getting a nice looking single family hame sold and financed on that lot. He is better a61e to build rental property, because the lending agents' rules are different on rental property. Mr. Price stated that if Mr. Doyle was looking for the best thing for the neighbor- hood, then he would not build a duplex, because the neighborhood does not want it. A single family home would be fine. • Ms. Dean stated she felt the issue of the other houses was germane to the issue, because they live there. At the last meeting, Mr. Doy1e had stated he would try to get an owner occupant in that duplex. She would challenge the members of the Planning Commission to consider whether they wou7d want to be the owner occupant of a duplex in this location. She stated there are three lanes of traffic on Osborne Way. There would not be any place for parking so close to the intersection, and the traffic light stands right on the property. Mr. Oquist stated he was looking at the other side of the issue. He understands the problem with having affordable nousing and what.young people are paying today to buy a home. Affordable housing is just not available anymore. Cities have to provide some kind of affordable housing for people,yet everybody is opposed to having it across the street from them. Ms. Hughes stated there are two considerations here, and they covered them in their last meeting: (1) the relationship to the St. Paul Waterworks property that gives the petitioner a buildable lot and could be revoked; and (2) what is the difference between rezoning and a special use permit in terms of the burden of proof? Mr. Harris stated that with a rezoning, it is encumbent upon the petitioner to show eause why the property should be rezoned. With a special use permit, which this request is, it is encumbent upon the City to show cause why the special use permit should be denied. So, if this request is denied, the Planning Commission must give substantial reasons for that denial. Ms. Hughes stated she would like to remind the Planning Commission members and the audience that they are dealing with a special use permit to allow a two-family dwelling unit in a single family dwelling area. If the permit is granted, it amounts to about the same as a rezoning. Ms. Hughes asked Mr. Doyle if he had considered having two lots instead of three lots. It would require moving some houses, but would give the large brown house more yard area and would provide a larger lot to get the building farther back from East River Road. Mr. Doyle stated he has considered that, but in looking at the economics of it, it is just too hard to just take down houses. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETIfdG, MAY 6, 1981 Mr. Boardman stated again that because of a speciai agreement with the Water Department of St. Paul that would allow the use of the St. Paul Waterworks property as a portion of lot size, this lot meets the lot requirements for a duplex. The City Council approved the plat on May 17, 1976. He stated that even if the special use permit was revoked, the lot was still buildable because of the approval of the plat. MOTION BY MS. HUGHES, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL�'TP CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SP N81-06 BY LEIGH INVESTMENTS� INC. � UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTINC AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HERRING CLOSED AT 8:28 P.M. � Ms. Hughes stated that because this lot is so small and is located off East River Road, it seems to create a lot of problems in terms of noise and vehicle exhaust emissions which would concern her about having anyone live there. It also seems out of character with the rest of the neighborhood which is single family. Since there are going to be some bikeway easements along East River Road, it seems the smart thing to do is deny the special use permit, and maybe the time will come when a single family home can be built on the lot. The special use permit seems to be a way around rezoning at this time and that did not appeal to her. Ms. Gabel stated she agreed totally with Ms. Hughes. The neighborhood is all single family and this is not compatib7e or desirable. Ms. van Dan stated she aiso agreed with Ms. Hughes. There is a lot of traffic in that area. She was also concerned about a two-story building obstructing the view of southbound traffic on East River Road. If fence or bushes were put in along the lot, she would also be concerned about the eastbound traffic on Osborne Way seeing the southbound traffic coming down East River Road. MOTION BY MS. HUGHES, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL DENZAL OF A REQUEST FOR R SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP �81-06,�BY LEZGH INVESTMENTS, INC.: PER SECTION 205.052, 3, D, OF TXE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO ALLOW THE CDIJSTRUCTION OF A DUPLEX IN R-1 ZONIN6 (SINGLE FAMILY DG9ELLING AREILS) ON IAT 3� BLOCK 1� LEIGH TERRACE� THE SAME BESNG 3I OSBORNE G9AY N.E.� FOR THE FOLlALJSNG REASDNS: � 1. THE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTRL IMPACTS ON THE LOT FROM NOISE RND VEHICLE POLLUTZON. 2. THE DANGERS OF TRAFFIC FROM A DRIVEWAY AND�MULTZPLE CARS AT THAT IACATION, 3. IT IS OUT OF CHARACTER WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOA � Ms. Hughes stated it was very obvious that the noise levels along East River Road could be very high at certain times during the day. It is an extremely busy road and when the bridge across the river is bui7t in Coon Rapids, particularly if there is access onto East River Road, that would make East River Road as busy as University Avenue. UPON A VOICE VOTE� NARRIS, VRN DAN� GRBEL, NUGNES, AND WHARTON VOTING RYE, SVANDA AND OQUIST VOTING NAY, CFIRIRMAN HARRIS DECLf1RED THE MOTION CARRIED BY�A VOTE OF 5-2. PLANNING COMt•tISSIOP! MEETIPJG, MAY 6, 1981 PAGE 5 Mr. Harris stated that SP #81-06 would go to City Council on May 18. 2. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #81-04, BY JOHN R. DOYLE: Split off the East 8 feet of Lot 12, an split off t e West 9 feet of Lot 14, and add to Lot 13, all in fridley Park Addition, to make a buildable lot after 32 feet of Lot 12 is taken by Anoka County, the same being 6307 East River Road N.E. Mr. Boardman stated the reason for the lot split request is primarily because of a court case that is going on right now in Anoka County. The property is located on East River Road south of Mississippi. Anoka County is presently acquiring property for expansion of East River Road. The County is planning on taking 32 ft. from Lot 72. The County is contending that what is beinq left is actually a buildable lot. The only way to make that determination and make that a buildable lot is through a lot split process. Mr. Doyle is before the Planning Commission and the City Council to see if the lot split will be granted. If the lot split is granted, then it is a buildable lot. The existing house is located on Lots 13 and 14. Mr. Boardman stated that by adding the 9 feet, then with the lot split the present lot would have a 57 ft. width and a 132 ft. depth and is 7,524 sq. fit. Sy code with the lot split, it is a buildable lot. The remaining lot has a 71 ft. frontage and 9,372 sq, ft. Mr. Boardman stated the question before the Planning Commission and City Council is: Will the Planning Commission and City Council approve a lot split request? This area was platted before 1955 where a lot cannot be less than 50 ft., but can be less than 60 ft. would would require 7,500 sq. ft. Mr. Harris stated that if Mr. Doyle cannot get financing to build a single family home on the lot on Osborne Way and East River Road, how did he think he could do it on this ]ot? P4r. Doyle stated he did not know. The lot does meet the requirements. What might be favorable on a lot that size is to be excused from having a garage in order to make the home affordable. Mr. Harris stated that from a comnunity standpoint and what would be best for the City would be for the County to acquire the wtiole 80 ft. lot, so there is adequate open space between the highway surface and the residential area. Acquiring pieces of property here and there has been done all the way up East River Road, causing road surfaces to be too close to dwellings and driveways and accesses too close to East River Road. Mr. Boardman stated he felt if this lot split request is denied, there should be something in the record that states if the County does acquire this property, this property be tied together in some way with Lot 13 so the 48 ft. would not go tax forfeit. If anyone tries to sell Lot 12 off from Lot 13, they would then require a lot split. He is very concerned about having a 48 ft. lot that may eventually go tax forfeit. �. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 6, 79Bi PAGE 6 Mr. Harris stated he is not in favor of having a structure between the existing structure and East River Road, which is a major highway, and he did think the boulevards should be wider in there. Three to five feet isn't even enough for snow storage. He stated they should not subject any more residents to being that close to East River Road, Ms. Hughes stated the Planning Commission's options are: (1) to give the lot split and presumably legally meet all the lot requirements of the plat, 6ut it would give them an undesirable lot; (2) if they do deny the lot split request, what is going to happen is the County will take the 32 ft. and then Mr. Doyle will have a 48 ft. lot. That 48 ft, could be tacked onto the 80 ft. lot, making a 128 ft. lot, which is a big lot. From the standpoint of the City, that did not look like a very good deal. From the standpoint of the petitioner, at this point she felt there was no overwhelming reason for him to have the lot split. So, on that basis, she thought maybe the best thing for the City would be to oppose the lot split. Mr. Harris stated not so long ago, the Planning Commission was discussing 7,500 sq, ft. lots versus 9,000 sq. ft. lots. The City has taken the position that they should stay with 9,000 sq. ft, lots. Community Development has concurred with that, and in his discussions with the City Council, the majority of the Council has agreed the City should stay with 9,000 sq. ft. lots. Now, to accommodate the County, the City is going to create a 7,500 sq. ft. lot. He felt that was being very inconsistent. Ms. Hughes stated 7,500 sq. ft. lots work in some places, but they do not work on corners, and the theory is to have larger corner lots. Mr. Harris stated the 57 ft, lot is inconsisteht with the rest of the neighborhood, which, for the most part, are residences built on 80 ft, lots. He felt it would be poor planning to put a residence on a smaller lot than is normal for the area only 17; ft. from a major higfiway, which basically is what they are being asked to concur with. He stated this was not a viable building site. Mr. Doyle asked if the Plantting Commission would be wi77ing to give an east/west lot split. Mr. Harris stated he could never eonsider an east/west lot split from the stand- point that it would be an absolute disaster as far as a hazard to safety. As City policy, they have tried to eliminate direct driveways onto East River Road, wherever possible. He believed it was also County policy to deny those kinds of requests, and in several instances along East River Road, the County has denied direct access onto East River Road. Mr. Oquist stated that in thinking about an east/west lot split, it may work out better to have an east/west lot split but have the driveway from the back lot come out on 63rd with a driveway easement. Ms. Hughes stated the east/west split as Mr. Oquist has proposed would have more appeal to her. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 6, 1981 PAGE 7 Mr. Harris stated the problem with the east/west lot split is it would still be creating two lots that are.not in character with the neighborhood. MOTION BY�MS. HUGNES� SECONDED BY MR. WHRRTON� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVRL OF�LOT SPLIT REQUEST� LS �82-04, BY JOHN R. DOYLE. Ms. Gabel and Mr. Svanda stated they basically agreed with all that t�r. Harris has said about the 57 ft. lot being inconsistent with the neigh6orhood and that it is not a viable building site. Mr. Oquist stated he also agreed with Mr. Harris. He agreed it did not make much sense to put a single family home on that size lot to be a buffer from East, River Road. But, do they have strong enough reasons to deny the lot split request? Mr. Harris stated he thought there was more to it than just the letter of the law, because there are people involved, there is the health, safety, and general welfare of the corronunity involved in granting such a lot split. Just because the letter of the law says they should approve the lot split, he did not think that was a viable enough reason to approve it. People have to live there. WITN TXE CONCURRENCE OF THE SECONDER, MS. HUGHES WITHDREW THE MOTION. MOTIOIJ BY MS. HUGHES, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL DENIAL OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST, LS #81-04� BY JOHN R. DOYLE, TO SPLIT OFF THE EAST 8 FEET OF LOT 22� AND SPLIT OFF THE WEST 9 FEET OF LOT 14� AND ADD TO LOS 23� ALL IN FRIDLEY PARK ADDITION� TO M�ICE A BUILDABLE LOT AFTER 32 FEET OF LOT 12 IS TAKEN BY ANOXA COUNTY� THE SAME BESNG 5301 EAST RIVER ROAD N.E., FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:� . 1. IT IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD. 2. IT IS A CORNER LOT WHICH IS REALLY 200 SMALL AND TOD CLOSE TO A�BUSY HIGHWAY. � 3. THE TRAFFIC PROBLEM TXAT COULD BE GENERATED BY DRIVEWAYS SO CLOSE TO � ERST RIVER ROAD. . 4. THE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FROM NOISE AND VEHICLE POLLUTION. Ms. van Dan stated she agreed with the motion for all the reasons mentioned and the danger because of accidents that have occurred on East River Road in the past. UPON A VOICE VOTE� HARRIS, VAN DAN� GABEL� SVANDA� OQUIST� AND HUGHES VOTING.AYE, WHARTON VOTING NAY� CNAIRMRN HARRIS DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 6-Z. Mr. Wharton stated he had voted against the motion because he believed when a person comes in requesting a lot split and if the lot split meets all the planning of the City's platting, there is no reason to deny that lot spTit. Mr. Harris stated LS #81-04 would go to City Council on May 18. Mr. Doy1e asked the Commission to make a policy decision on whether they would allow an east/west lot split with access onto East River Road. PLANNING COMMISSION h4EETING, MAY 6, 1981 PAGE 8 MOTTON BY I+IR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MS. VAN DAN, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL THAT THEY NOT RLLOW ACCESS DIRECTLY ONTO EAST RIVER ROAD OR ANY OTHER LOT CONFIGURATION WITH�THIS LOT �S ZT NAS BEEN THE POLICY OF THE CITY TO ELIMINATE ACCESS ONTO EAST RIVER RORD� WNEREVER POSSIBLE. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMRN�HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNRNIMOUSLY. � - 3. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSED CONVERSION CONDOMINIUM LI MOTZON BY MR. OQUIST� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO OPEN THE PUBZIC HEARING ON THE CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSED CONVERSION CONDOMINSUM LICENSING ORDINANCE. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTSNG AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARTNG OPEN AT 9:50 P.M. � Mr. Boardman stated the only reason this is back on the Planning Commission agenda is because when the Planning Commission took action on this ordinance and recommended approval to the City Council, they did not have a pub7ic hearing at that time. What is needed now is for the Planning Commission to take action on the ordinance with a public hearing. MOTSON BY MR. WHARTON� SECONDED BY MR. 5VRNDR� TO CIASE THE PUBLIC HERRING ON THE CONSIDERIiTION OF A PROPOSED CONVERSION CONDOMINIUM LICENSING ORDINANCE. UPON R VOICE UOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIR�IAN FIARRIS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 9:51 P.M. MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MS. VAN DRN, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF R PROPOSED CONVERSSON�CONDOMINIUM LICENSING.ORDINANCE. � UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE,�CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLRRED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY. � � . 4. RECEIVE APRIL 14, 7981, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO RECEIVE TXE APRIL 14� 198I, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES. � Mr. Oquist stated they are still discussing the purpose of their commission. Mr. Oquist stated that on page 6, because of a request by the City Council, the Community Development Commission members discussed and recommended some criteria as the minimum requirements in establishing a special use permit for two families in a single family unit in an R-1 zone. He stated the Community Development Corrmission would like the Planning Commission to concur with this recomnendation. Mr. Oquist stated there are some things ttiat cannot be enforced, but it has always been his opinion that if you have an ordinance, at least you can enforce it, but if you don't have an ordinance, there is nothing to en€orce and there is no pro- tection for the City. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 6, 1981 PAGE 9 The following changes were made to the criteria recommended by the Comnunity Development Commission in their motion on page 6: "....to recommend to City Councii the following criteria as the minimum requirements for establishing a special use permit for existing sin le famil dwellin units to allow two families in a single family we ing unit in an - zone: 1. Minimum lot size of 9,000 sq. ft. 2. Floor area for either family unit not less than 650 sq. ft. 3. Off-street parking, incTu�Cin ara e, for at least 4 vehicles 4. Cannot be permanently sea e of i.e.., common entry way, one address, one water meter, one gas meter, and one electric meter) 5.. Special use permit expires at sale ' 6. One apartment is owner-occupied 7. Conditions of special use permit on file at County with title 8. Conforms w th State Building Code. MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MS. HUGHES, TO CONCUR WTTH THE RECOMMENDRTIONS OF TNE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, RS AMENDED RBOVE� ON THE CRITERIA AS THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS IN ESTABLI5HING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY UNITS TO ALIAW TWO FAMILIES IN R SINGLE FAMILY UNIT IN AN R-1 ZONE. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTIDN CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHRIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION TO RECEIVE TXE MYNUTES CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. OTHER BUSINESS: A. Bike Trail in Locke Park Ms. Hughes stated she wanted to alert the Planning Commission that the County's plan for a bike trail through Locke Park and along Rice Creek is creating a lot of fervor among the citizenry. The County was about to award bids for an asphalt bike trail through the creek bed and through some marshes which would require some digging and filling, and the citizens east of Old Central were very upset about what was going to be done and began to ask some questions. There are a number of actions the citizens have taken by going to the Rice Creek Watershed District Board and the County Board. She stated they are doing a fine job in trying to get an agreeable compromise. She stat�d the Parks & Recreation Corrmission did nbt know there was going to be an 8-ft. wide asphalt path with 2 ft. of grass on either side, plus another 8 ft. of hiking trail and about 7 bridges across the Creek between Locke Park and New Brighton. She stated the City does not have much say on this, other than what goes in Locke Park and not much of that either, so she felt the citizenry are doing a great deal of good and are digging up facts. She stated the Planning Commission nray be seeing some petitions in the near future. PLAfJNIPJG COMMISSION MEETIfJG, MAY 6, 7981 PAGE 10 B. IYDP (International Year of Disabled Personsj MOTION BY MS. VAN DAN, SECONDED BY MS, GABEL, TO RECEIVE INTO THE RECORD THE MINUTES OF THE IYDP ORGANIZATIONAL'MEETING ON APRIL 2I� 1981. Ms. van Dan stated she thought this was going to be a very viab}e project committee, and the committee is a7ready proposing some excellent projects. She stated the next meeting�will be on May 11, at which time the committee will deve7op a survey form which, hopefu7ly, wi71 be included in the City's surrr.�er newsletter. The survey will be to try and locate the disabled people in the City of Fridley and determine what their needs are. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLIIRED THE MOTION CARRTED UNANIMOUSLY. ADJOURyMENT: MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA, TO ADJOURN�THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE��ALL VOTZNG AYE� CKAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MAY 6, I9BZ��PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING $A70URNED AT I0:20 P.M. � Respectfu7ly submitted, c�l-�i.. L ry e Saba Recording Secretary ---� PU[3LIC IIEARING [3EFORE TNE PLANNIIJG COfdMISS10N li NOTICE is he+-by given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, June 3, , 1981 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: kequest for a Special Use Permit, SP #81-08, by Peter D. Eisenzimmer, Per Section 205.�51, 2, A, of the Fridley City Code, to allow the construction of a second accessory building, a 26 ft. by 28 ft. detached garage, located on Part of Lot SC, Second Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 21, the same being 6535 Oakley 5treet N.E. Any arid all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at ths above stated time and place. Publish: May 20, 1981 May 27, 1981 RICHARD H. HARRIS CHAIRMAN PLANNING COh1MISSION iwwri �i/'� CITY OS= Fa1OLCY, �' SUL'JE-:Cl' cn:�i.ur��v�tr.� irv nve. nir. - M$ FRIOLqY� MN 7:i4LIF2 l[.9:'3 `i7'I-:J�l':O a .. . P 12 SPCCIIIL US[ PERI4IT �i�^ �� ' SP N d DATE S_— �` �� PLAtdPJItdG COIihiISSIOPJ: P.H. DATE �� APPROVED DISAPPROVED DATE NO CITY COUhlCIL: P.H. P.EQ'D DATE NO CITY COUNCIL: APPROVED__ DISAPPROVED! DATE NO STIPULATIONS: NAl+IE %i�r// ��5�:✓�;�c.c�efy - . -, STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY G S 3S FEE_ ��,!'>,CO RECEIPT NO��7 �• ,3y o yz-�� s � LEGA4 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY %''�rP �� _ �l /�cf � Sc' . o� / PRESENT ZOtJIIJG CLASSIFICA7ION� EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY .� _ ACREAGE OF C. DESCRIBE E3RIEFLY THE PROPOSED TYPE OF USE AND .. , -,� , C� 3 �'r� � �' ; �/i'�.��P ;� G "� � � ' ffas the present applicant previously sought to rezone, p1at, obtain a lot split or variance or speclal use permit on the subject site or part of it? _�yes no. What aras requested and when? The undersigned understands that: (a) A list of all residents and owners of property witnin 300 feet must be attached to this application. (b) This application must be signed by all o�vners of the property, or an explanation gi��en i,�hy this is not tne case. (c) Responsibility fer any der'ect in ihe proceedings resulting from the fa�lure to Tist the names and addresses of all residents and property owners of property in question, belongs to the undersianed. A s4;etch of proposed property and structw•e must be drawn and attached, showing the follot+ing: 1. North direction. 2. Location of proposed struc�ure on the lot. 3. Uimc�nsicros of property, prol?osed st.ructure, ar.d front anci side set6acks. 4. Sti•ect names. 5. Location and use of adjacent existing buildings (within 300 feet). - ' Tl;e undersignrd hereby decl�res that all the facts and representations stated in this ;application are true and co��rect. Df1TE � y - �� - z`3 � _� SIGtdRI'URE��" ��-�'-' �1a�--y! �n-�n-E'9 — �F11� f'i_ I CA�d l� ADllItCtiS ,L _�_ % � �� ' � /�' ,/�t :U rN�=----�--r�-3 `� TF:LEPIiO,�F fd0_ � %/-y�� d `i -- �----�---- MAILING LIST SP #81-08, PETER A. EISENZIMMER 2nd Accessory building at6535 Oakley Mr. & Mrs. touis G 6553 Oakley Drive Fridley, Mn 55432 Planning Commission 5-14-81 Wells, Jr. Mr. & Mrs. William Kerchner �.E. 1015 Mississippi Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Muryl Herda 6551 Oakley Drive N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Harold Marchand 7001 Mississippi Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Hilary Mayers 969 Mississippi Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. John Kurak 6547 Oakely Drive N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. PeteraEisenzi�ner 6535 Oakley Drive N.E. fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Jeffrey Gustafson 6558 Oakley Drive n.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Donald Swanson j�660 0akley Drive N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Ronald Bloom 6542 Oakley Drive N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. James Tauer 6534 Oakley �rive N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Fredrick Brandt 953 Mississippi Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Walter Miller 945 Mississippi Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Delbert Harris 6542 Brookview Drive N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Elton Bolduan 6556 Brookveiw Drive N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 13 / ♦ N i _ � �ocAT z orv - ru� � :. �1m��, � .t�y` � i ��i��U�b y ! 4 �` '.�u � IF ` �'y u: y:i°4 � .mnr S _� � ��r � y'� �' �� d ��'^�:' .. E,..` .., , �' . 7 �! �'. « r- _ '' `i i ii i fJ:' ,� � i�� '' � .�w, co R. '�MCNI �IN L0. �� YWL�F0.15 SPiMl16 l�[E Mnr 14 SP#87-03 EISENZIMMER 6535 OAKELY $TREET STREET MA.P-CITY OF FRIDLEY � C'� �� 4M1 / :�'- � �, � "� 921/ L. "'� `� �: /ty / � �� h94i L�9aa.ti% � i . 7 � ;, ; g4 �' 9�t�y � '1 >� �` � � 6 ; i93 a i :� � 161 �' �°' � S.^•�� •. �y901 '- M^ ��g %g� 991 ,.? /3 � �xs °� � �y A ,' qg� . Z�s%� � S " u 9� O 7 0 � o � ° isza+�_� g 9908 ; ;z :i n a,z �o r�,z�`�953 96� so i 7f � X �!� /1 T � L_... .��K�1�\G�� q..��///�/J��'''�� : 11�'e i Q�/ ��6 t3' . l t ,s r+;' ' �1 >f.... /Js_ � � C.•fj• •f' fi;d/s�v? �/ � —° `_� .f �penf) � � r/380� 3. - f �� O � _ �o : w aq�o. c2�� -� . �� : ' 2 6 �i� •Sn ,o.. � � ' 6545 � � H 95 '961 aJ . /J ��f91 I \� , 7_ Jbg� ��.� ;;, ,: � ,bg4o 99t �� 1�0 66z �% 'p685� 684( a /7. � p� l_OY F GV�� ,ti, i 6 /2! ✓ � bezi m �� r _ /13.e W 68ti J ; /g 1o39a 'i SO N!�•d��sc _ry "SOe.e�•.. _ � ,..,. , a.. �,. > > ,., ,,, . ,-. . r.� ef :;J;,wz I: ^ y; :, � 1? � : i ' ' �� 990 i000 ioio , > ' ° �:.w� v... ,t'�' ' ^ 99! 3 IOOJ.3I � l` i ; •, � s� �1W ^!� a e� 6� K � ✓,� :: ��J.� , �_ : , � ��) _ ; �; Y 4A 6558 : ' 8 F �..=: 6s , t tt'(zzao r , e 6534$ G �is s� ^`�i : �/ . .� ) ;y`= ��. � P Ka `�e � aoi..•u a. 6553 /� 8 N ;7aao/ 6551 n (2:IO) i iI� ae � � � 68SC� i : -, � , , • � � � , - ��.�q z � � 6a4o� I I , r K �r81TOJ , � iz> >a - 683o N I ENZ�MME�2 � 5 5 OAKEY ST ! /T.IIB bs�o i T�i io � t+.1 h /If49 �� ' � I �} � 6810 I CQ � i // m � 123f� � � 6800 � � I • 5 ` ;z 9 = ,� Z � � ; ` ', �, i a. �i ^i,• � J9%9� a-r" {'�'.o. � , •• � i j �° @ 7• „� ia..---- � '�. G�--: ,,,� x 3 — � � � �J � : Fi � : r�� 15 �� 63'61 68 b� ..��.,:. �� , �� ApG. i J1 ; 6g31 � avas "sszK��. � : � . _� h � ` ^. ` . � ryy _ �6/a�o) ` I �� M' � I . ; (.�- . i 8;. � ' k � ' Y o�.see c�t ..� �oxf 1o51'to61 � Z�" p 66T0-9O ��.9!" /oF/ /od9 � �. � � JE.° � a.'� .. l6A�/C �' G6b4o 4% ' --- �s+✓t� ---'. ° v 8 (/` : S;,:�$� i w ' a� � --- � Y° �i—' , 0 6Crr,-. v6606 � ---- ��..1---- a �6+_30 ---. � � � V 0 !� `'' � � n f%%� � a 66Zo Pf�.66o0 6m `__"."'_I_'h _—_ 0 6% 6 �., � � ' � �� . 8 � . . 6 EP,�._. 6566 'f�r � 3 r.-A 8 i r q�o, l 66<< . . I " . - L!,. -- ----- ----- {,�.; � . ' � o _ \ (C�-. 9 i � v � 6S` - �+--- ��o? I� '�. --1----- ; ec.; � ,. : � ,,c ; _ r Q,��Er. ' . y.—_e7J3t.. � .n -7�3'r'f�:'.::' �,�oo �,1 ��; tli (2rz4) (,ZS,i�I (�seo,iI �:i. -. � ,..,....,. �ovo) � �„v . ' �io9 Z� �� . 6°' 9 A 19 C 9�4" . ::�:�.. 8� � \ � � F O I ; I 1/ ° �.'?300. /22$i:1 N M 2�` N � �� IZZO�� `� '.'r ' . '$ � �8 }i ; -- ; _ '—� �' �:: � �COa�) , I � � n ¢1 I i� � • � 925 931 935 945 953 q69 400� 1°�s �oz� ;�• `"� . ia.rr- .�• :._�o. ,.,,F � ir � -'v' ,n s� � . . . ... ,a 06 �_ /7.` _ :.'n' IL_.. . . _fLt��Q��G_i � : �Jaiv ;. IP '�; •1 l. ' ' —'�F3:`�5�.—`Alf}--F-F`,N`f.-f�}O:f-'= ''---- --- 7 Y£R --- - i �.. . 3 ' � r_ e � ��: \ ,\ '�) �. � �/ r,� � L�T �ERR YF�'�o $P t�31-O8 EISENZIMPIER 6535 CaK�EV $TREET ii.E� � � J � � � �l � ��/� � �v \�\c� ;J ('/�1j � �� ( � � �u� - �� .� � ;�y�' — —; �_ ; ' � a � �` � ; ,�a,3� ,,:Y� ..__' '_"'-_'�l � � I� i F" .�iC./�.e . _,_,_c ,,, CncF�c'qcF �5�� 'CUE�('/-1 C"L-J 2 � `7� �' � -=--- �� a^i� � y ✓ C� E � �d' 1 6 ��V f}- �� -------- — ��/ 0�� T'� �O T /��'Efl _ ' . 3 � ��' i�:JF fi,�'EA —�� Z o0. C � /lClc� C^h'��iG�/�,c"Efi— 7��C' � ��H� r�A�'IJ �=1,F'r- N—.�, ,�v � � � �tnR� •� ��; �, aN� ��Vt.s€� �csJ�ro,?'s �_� rral -_._. �-- � a:ir�r C�:= f :'!!�.-�Lf.c'f� � ��l� ftn:19 iil'JIV"Ittilf\' hk�C. PIG. \') f[Sff]L!_Y, MfJ. G'vA3:: lU9i:] t:J'7-J.?I:O S'��Jt:CT LOT SPLIT RECORD[D: 17 LS �i�]�Q5 AUURESS: 6550 and 6570 Hickory Street N.E. DATE: 5/30/81 PLllNN1IJG COf4t�1ISSI0IJ: FlPPROU[D__ DISAPPROVED_ DATE �une 3, 1981 N0� CITY COUt;CIL: Af'PROVED_____ DISAPPROV[D� DATE! PARK FEE P,[QUIRED: ye5 AMOUNT 5500.00 pplp STIPULATIOlJS: NAME ( � lil:�X-4 �- �-��`""� , PROPERTY OWNER(S) Charles . Johanson 424 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E ADDRESS(ES)_� Fridley, Mn 55432 NO FEE ��5.00 RECEIPT NO 3149 TELEPHONE NO 571-8021 TELEPHONE NO PROPERTY LOCATION ON STREET 6560 Hickorv Street N E LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Lots 9, 10, 11, Block 6, Fridley Park /%n�B,� � /O l�t..c. �i�yf y � S ��y .� // °� � 7 G X /�-s''_' r � �J� !6� 9ti3 + TOTAL AREA OF PROPERTY �� ___ PRESENT ZONIfdG R-1 REASON POR LOT SPLI7 Removed old house assessed val�e of 38 800 House was in very bad shape and set a� back of lot not nossible to rPpair^�-' , no se�rer and water hookup _ The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this ap�lication are true and correct. DAIC: NOT1f.E: � _____ � � SI6fJATUR@_� ' � �� ' 4� ' ..�,_ ,� A skeLch of the pro7erty and the propo�•ed lot s{�lit with any existing struc- tures shown siiould accrnrpany this ��pplir..ai:ion. (See reversc side for additional instructions) i, �. •�.....�� —_�._ - �.� �...��_ v..�._.__..___ .t,,._. �. e � i` � . 1981 POLICY STATEMENT OP� PARK FEES 13 ON LAND SUBDIV3SION � " Date Zv�� In determining fair market value of public areas for land subdivision for cash payment, as required by Ordinance 633, the followiny va}ues will be used: Residential subdivision $1,000.00 per lot Residential lot split � 500.OQ per lot Commercial/Industrial subdivision or lot splits � 0.015 per sq. ft. This fee is to be paid at the time of final plat or lot split approval. The City Council may defer coilection to the time a building permit is requested for individual lots created by such subdivision/lot sptit. The City retains the option to accept an equivalent amount in cash from the applicant for part or all of the portion required to be dedicated. PARK FEE AGREEMENT The undersigned understands that according to the City Platting Ordinance, the following public park land dedication is required to plat residential, commercial or industrial zoned property. It is further understood that the public park land dedication or cash payment equivalent is at the discretion of the City. It is agreed that a cash payment of ��DO.°"'will be paid according to the above stated policy for the following subdivision/lot split. It is agreed that the following land dedication is provided above stated policy for the following subdivision/lot split: Dedication: Subdivision/]ot split: according to the The undersiqned further agrees to notify all future property owners or assigns of the cash payment requirement, if it is to be collected at the time of buildiny permit. DAT er 0084A/10G'/F� :;:.:, / \ N BL��ME ,. ,_, , _ . _ �� ;�- : � a�,�,�' _ „� ,� �. _ coa n�>ios ��•i : __ � II "'�1) 1�� .... ��ih°� . �..ti � � " .� ` .� h �! a �� « ,1� a...-^ 11 ' � � e 4 �. � � � �� .�� 4�� _ T ' .J, Ytl� u � I . _�� lY+_. �s �illp � �� 1 i� ;e 3, j` _ o.. � t 4�r nj,� i� � W.a'/a a �; i d 4 9�d,✓�O r .Y ib b/ g �.. ��, Sa A r . . `+�- ' • i ��° ��(1 ''...< Y �� II �I I � � LOCATION � 6 u � S s o� w. � �; .,,. � 'ra �`� +' � �� _— ' Af �' VA � 'Il 1 M � �,I Le �Y f ��\�� IJLtL � ��'b��. ^�j �r �,'�rY;z, _ I� �i:�l — �r:�.�A.u�' � � " �� neu� 1 L— \\` 'I r''� � 'I'_ \ �I ��wu i'�� a �„ � .; L� �,� _ , , �,r-i� �- � �;� � , � �;��,� ,�"n�{�� a -1: � ,�,�'��. t��_ .... < 1 s ' S � f �e � ��,X�� r., ��•��\..... `� 1 i i � Li � I � r. �, '��( n�"�--«ir�i rw co. .,�. wMC..a�s [ C C 19 ��$��al—OS CHARLES �OHANSON 9MING taKf YY[ ,, L� ...� � COLUYBi� � c XE�W1T5 � 3 .k.�h.•..Y STREET MA.P-CITY OF FRIDLEY 0 3,333 6,666 u P" � A j ._ :• . �.,- ' `� / ; I e < � l /' � __ : 3 , , J �;��x, - wn:wt � g)� �� \ � . �. . � ��ti I� � �� ri�7 p � � 193 �v j , li q �I ' °; �` '� � , � ��c//`,� �� ,, 2 ,w� �,�;::� F � �� M -! . .. , rvi ��DP.�, Y ; tl� •: ( �� k. ` {� T•. \ G 10 � � .a . �. / �+ .�,7„w� � � �jl � � . � �Sml � � I e f, ts ri• � �% : , ,�L �/ %fl.�ie i�p � i �: '� /r,i. ` �� r: � _��fr.s.�.f,• � 1 S '�" :e Gi� �� /i�ne/ L. S � �1 � ylri- � , �;�� ^�.1 a/ —u � fo�e��-� _ t /��' �{sJ � i ; (1 �%'�'ovf,r,at�.HA LE "-:i�01-f'F�'N 0 ''' 'P /!,, �.. � `� � V • n+ i � J g � 'V � � !t $ �� s � ", � +n�• IO J L �'+:,.�u�OP.�1 ��j,.-. y { 4\ '..3 _ f ,� �v.'.'�� '_ � l� " � � Q4� c. � f F. Z � L �! n a. .. �° 7_ �.� a �?1 1'� � � ^,� 3 lt�.� n'�i,�� I�6 i " ,�o.� a�b'� eh 1� i / 9��-" C3J '�sa.°rn,�0 � � � ,a, , . , , � l � �� ; rvC,,,1�..0 _ _L.:_,.�f . , , �n ,9 . ;. � , � p�b.. �+ a _ " �� K fk�� .. - � � % � u ,/,.� Q. = t°y�' 3 �i 6 "° �;� � (� p I �.i E 19 .�'.i�i �r-sdr� iii� . . � � r�� 9l �g � � :� ) ^ ,� 'y -' • ,� � �.�,�iN"�t! . . 'Z'? '� ., v/,,'�} / . ..�. • ' � .��if fi�� 9A ��r ��.m.•. r.�.,( `� _Y iR A �. rat1N '-.r " ... �r \ � a )! ''�4 `'y. �� i . �� e -:-, . . '-' rw�, { t �r . � j � ?d S ( '. .��W r- 1�"a ) ^� nn *4.. � �, - l�.�r'/ + ` ,J!' / r� ' 1 � ` �\`�J � �� r1t1 �� (��eA� r;�p a,��J32 �y/' ?� �O �r�isc. + fit { - a�j� � r„i.;y S>s//_ p S (1r Y.7' i ��c1 �g n�? Iiy,' . r '��, ,�4 � �25 1 - pitJ� �?�: +�� ")� �p ! t1� { 6 � 'Y a. � i . / qo ` �;. ��n � . 4 I N Q� � �' Q ~�� ua.�d,e� �is� � - . _�� r 'D� b66�6a" t,ai , d ir � � a '�1 � �* u,. � %9 ° e:.� � So� „ e i `� ' � b,� y ,� � b � 5 „ " s f 3 ' ' s S !� ��/ � ( .. .`:„� $ s k3,� z� b u�. � . . . '� ` l '� � U" D� >, � ! �� R{iL�'� �Ay� y�c Q`t �� _ � x � iT ii :.`)� ' �a' . "�.� . e' K S� .:� Vn Vb^ ��Y� ,7� � !8 �: b a, �..,��r� �.�� ' 4��i' �'' M. " a}1 s ��C��:6=.�+� c�� ''�fFJ?!. nylY .yY VA _�� C. K ag'c 56 S �, r y�� ° . �o . 2� ., .w \�_. ` '..✓'. -n - � -6+v ,. =�r •��/��'�i � � 0 � .y� �l: N ` `'� �.' �!: / �O i � : u- -i/�" � .-� �, � �� p d 9s ...� �„ 4� �. 3Z v I "°��, t': �� b�b �` 1 1 ) 1 O _ t �e ni' �� 115 � �(� � - �� r_En /x . t f�i c a Bil 1+'' ne° _,' ,,,� �, A'g�� ;a , kbt. �6 �� . . ��' .,•�n �:. �,� � 1:' , �_ � ��e 5 �R"/`C ° � �9 q "�* 33 # IO .i ° Zoq .� . / �,,��'�C� a�; �;gY �bb �.,3 � ,' �F� d ' �OJ 7 � .l 4/r� 'ri � � j� . ' ,'`.�^ �'t�b .i�,�ri � 4 � • � 4� � ,, '�,��,b, � i ,a zg , �� I r� "; C. - � s — *�.\ Y' p ,�, r � ar� .n. .q "'� ri � M. 'y� ,'.�� d�, � Gv'� �1°.+ u-Y s., a,s ... ' ��i\' �.r, �".. u� r�� ° G s, '' � k., �- eJ N 1�O� �7 59 9�, �� p3 , � -- ..s 7 � r s a. 1 .f{.. ,r .c� if'. �,,:,, '�� bo, ��JO y ., g � ;,o: � ,M i �'`�� ;Ji� � �:� � ,,,� b � � b c+ •. ; � �o ' � �' � 1n ' �`£� - '� / . � �. � t • � �... .� � 4 Z a• g / t t ,x�\ . {,Q� , � . ,iAw"\- 9 , �" .:. +e `°3 � �V ' �� a„ � . ��y� r )CJ /� / . Md °i�t ��i . �Vl• % �'O d .•.:.: l/� p ss.u.� f> V� ��r\i 9e ��y,�'v /��G ��„�a , � Il��• ��- � � �� i . �• �O � i1 � Jf�\a k �. I.;�y '0 �. �W ^ � � �}Y k a -. � ' \,j � d,� ,N� . 'F4� ,.v � a � t� ,�:: , � (n P t�. _ q� �t ,� s.. la � �� 1� A j . >- .. �.,;:;,.,.:::�:�:;. N` o.• g �,� . ,Qk � � j _ qa . .. w�� io � � r::��' � .4� ` � ar I� ,7\0 �_ •aA 1 I :� �' �o � �� /- �{ �y k�'' .� ri. mr :s,�j "� �n6� ^�� .�t- � '•_• ' �: � t�'1 v � ��/��4 �A- �•,1%� 1`�' i .�!�.y , " ��2 �� rV�.�,t4 'l H . Q�� aS�O � �• � ~ O r „ (°��' �� ,� , .. � ` y « v�rv 445- �' ' , , =st z, .K �� L \. � O � a R-r;r�m' . @ '� �,CJ' • sj,.,, �� g a.�. � b�'�> 2�tt r ..t6sa,�,. • '' AC'��y? .. � � � . �•- � •�C ( rr�`.h y , : TR�''-, .+. .,�' `� =-, ' � <i po� , uQ—. A t� � v'° Z, j• �� C�, � �.c ,b5� ,b�i, 1 6siu 'c ..b G1 30 ; � a s k p RA.�� a w r ,, __ �a . ,� �k t,,,� ,, t,,. � \ ,� �50.�- .��o __ . � 65fo ; ( :. LS �� °� Q i1 I _ `K q I v o q s��( � D,* i . •� h� ' % 1 �D�i� � / �V I . '�_ r� �. • .(�pC �,� ,, �_, ', , ; ; s (�„ � •. � c�.�. � 14 �M c 1 saf�r E, ��.� .��..''•. ,cil1�- _ r; t a' Jr � � . 4 S'%,ty J^ ,y � �! t'�j3 � `1 'R>J3; �i,rJOSJ.tf�.v.evd�LL._� � msa v '�� .. y • rs 1` f N �� r w v \ \ ` "' " " _ -- - �; -.�:,�'» ' , ` G �- - - :�. — � MISStSStnt�1 � WAY RA �2 � � -.....,r :. � , .. ---�"T , �� ..,, <,. �' ,..�� s�' � 1 ;� .,�o - ` � �-- _ ��.' ' � ,� 7 =�. -`"� � - �,:e'or _ x�� + , ' � � ! r,.�. a � M 011 . G!1 �lUlal - � � 411I5 11 N� Y No. G� �� L . /\/ �',t1�lV '3A�! � �� ,nN�f Wi ia61�7J \� �.".'.� �Ot �RRA�HO �_ ___ _.". — _'_—_ __ __._—.� -- —" . � . V �! �rY�umtlllcv E90futp Uod i Mwvn�nl Fnp�wrN/ � 5rvl iueM � l nnA Sw��,r�M � Lb TWnwV I Bvnwd4.AM �equ 55JL . n� .. �. }� . L �47 Cortitic3�ie oi 6urvey !or (NA(>t-fl� -IO�IAr�h�� r"�G' k � ,^ � L,S, f,�1-05 �� y , �. � `.��n+l P. «4 �I � . . r- ��y w/ y 0 `ry5Q°`A\ / �' ,� _ . �P�f).4/ rf `6 /r.� L��; �a /� � � � °'��, �,�aa"• . . . ,/ sS` <.� . � � �... V^�:,�. . 's.�: � � ' � � ��. . ,/ � 0 � �` - .. /y, 0� I L7��L,> )� . �, -;< ' � ,�� ,�o 0 6 ,, s �, - � .,� °' -�� ,, , ' . . � h. � � � .�aP^ 9 �`�' � _ � % !AC� : /� �� . p • r - : S � . - 1• �l ' l'� ,r 8 "'a' \ ' �/ ' . '1 ^ • \, � • � �' d� i., zct' `� �y0 .. - �`� _ £f', C'wR Sc. Q" '� ), � .. � n� � � . hp . 2a,s,. �'6 � ��.�0 ,h q►� . . .. ^9 � . 17 � - . -.. /�� b . . . : � �l . \'v . $li°�� . .. � � . . . . . \ . . � .. � `'y(� . ..� .. � .. � .. \\ . : , . • .. . �.. �' . .: . . � . � \ � . �. . . . - - � � - .. : .. . � . � . . -.� � . o U(R��E"l 1�Ori Mor+UMBr�r �JGALY... I."�Ao� r�oR-fH l�er(E .. . ... .. . A�-i TH0 OQY.�r�ne. PW'( OF � t'(IivLE�{ �i�QK NA�-i ho MAY�^( M�ritN4 �ir-icN5lor+�-i, . �„7� U/�0U 1i'�fsr1 MOr�VrtG-�-"�ti F��v lr-� 1'HE 4�oUr�D� I�iT'��i OF OLGU�.'(�o� . Ar+P TH�? f''�l,ji�•-��, np ��cwaT��-' Gn�oEN�i -�"o E�ni'j'At�usN THE GvQi-fER"� . of TN�'� F�f'�>fJE�''(Y• WE FtiGOHM6N0 TNA"j' �'HE Go�i�EFS oF TN�2 PF��?Y . Pj( JUOi4IALL'� �£:f�NC-D. � � .. . �. .� �,qTta �'li,i�7 q f 1, �',�L� :� (a, �('t�'it�.�-`( Pn(: � - A�lOKI� Gvur�T-� !-uC'»GC7- -TV EA5EM6+�-r°� o¢ 4?EGo�o, 1'F Ar�`(. � . , � ��a��ay iar111y Ihu� Ihlf I� a lruo and ccrraat rcprmcnlullw o1 0 �u�ray e/ fh� boundwri�� of �6� abo�� ul6e�,1 land�a�iJ ni 1hs lecellen o1 ell LullSiava� lharnon� ond ail vini�b anvaaehmanf�� i! any� irem w M �old IenJ. A� {VIY��IpA IlY M� �hi�^�tay ol f-� rt" _A.D. 1J.^ . � . .. . �t� . ?:��-i flC3 EF� ��?tac&C;ff'S�, tNL. � .. - - � [e�inoen . Svrv�re��. ' . , . . . . . 4y iY.7/ _ � . . � . . Re� � CITY OF FRIULEY HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETIN6 MAY 7, 1981 :CALL TQ QRD£R; Chairperson van Dan called the May 7, 1981, Human Resources Commission meeting to order at 7:32 �S.m. • ROLL CALL: Members Present: Members Absent: Others Present Mary van Dan, Peter Treuenfels, Lynn Boergerhoff Jayne Noble, Brian Goodspeed Mary Cayan, Human Services Assistant APPR{IVAL OF APRIL 2, 1981, HUMAN RESOURCES C�MMISSION MINUTES: MOTTON'BY MR. TRUEN&NFELS�� SECONDED BY MR. BOERGERHOPF� TO APPROVE THE�APRZL 2� 1981� HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTS, ALL VOTING AY6� CHAIRPERSON VAN DAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � � . 1. INTRODUCTION OF LYNN BOERGERN(lfF, NEW COMMISSION MEMRER Mr. Boergerhoff stated he was born in Minneapolis, but grew up in Fairmont, Minnesota. He graduated in 1973 from Moorhead State College with a Bachelor of &rts Degree in Social Work. He was not successful in finding a job in the field of social work he liked so he became involved in the ambulance service. He has been working for six years fow Health Center, a company that owns Mercy and Unity Hospitats, and provides ambulance service for Anoka County and parts of Ramsey and Hennepin Counties. He stated he is married and-has lived in Fridley for about one year. He is very happy with the City. He has s€xne interest in public health and human resource-type subjects and would like to become more involved in his community. Ms. van Dan welcomed Mr..Boergerhoff to the Cammission. She stated he has already become quite invoived as he was elected co-chairperson of the IYDP project committee on April 2l. 2. DISGUSSION OF CONMISSION 60ALS: Ms. van Dan stated that she regretted that two of the Cortmission members were absent for this discussian of the Commission goals, She stated it was her tholight that they take`the Human Resources Commission's purpose (Section 6.131 from the City Ordinance), review the Fridley City goals, and the Human Resources Commission's goals that were developed in 1974-75, and try to come up with sane thoughts on which direction the Conunission would like to go. NUMAN RESOURCES COt�iMI5SI0N MEETING, MAY 7� 19$1 ' PAGE 2 Ms. van Dan stated she hoped to confine themselves to four areas: (1} human rights; (2) fiuman services .(including funding); (3) accessibility (includes transportation); and (4) comnunitation, The Commission members reviewed the City Goals & Objectives and felt the following goals and/or objectives were within the responsibility of the Human Resources Commission: D200 - Help foster an attitude which stimulates life-long motivation for lea ming and cultural development. Mr. Treuenfels stated this might be within the Human Resources Commission's scope, but it may not be something the Commission wouid vrant to get involved with right away. He fett this was in the field of "humanities", which was an important goal, but not one of the more important goals. D300 - Provide pubiic information and cortmrunication in order to foster an awareness of the City's varied activities and availability of these activities. Ms. van Dan stated this was within the scope of the Human Resources Commission and should be one of the goals �f the Comnission for the next year. D40,0 - Promote efforts for providing essential human services to all persons iro the community. �500 - Encourage programs designed to promote effective human understanding within the community. Mr. Treuenfels stated he felt this fell under the goal of °human ri hts". This would include youth, senior citizens, ethnic minorities, re igious groups, other life styles, minorities, and should include disabled. 5100 - Assure the security of the individual from criminal acts and civil wrongs. Ms. van �an stated that she had approached the Planning Commission with the question of whether or not the Human Resources Commission should be involved with security, crime prevention, etc. Mr. Boardman felt it was not the responsibility of the Human Resources Commission to aadress these kinds of issues, and Mr. Harris, Chair- man of the Planning Commission, had stated if the Human Resources Commission was not comfortable with it, they need not address this area. Mr. Boergerhoff stated that if funding for public services such as police and fire is tc+t in the future, the whole idea of home security and personal security may not have as much backing from the Police Department as it has in the past, so it may be appropriate for the Gomnission to address tfiis in the future. Mr. Treuenfels stated he felt thi5 was an important area of city life, especially with respect to the disabled. It appears that no other commission has formally undertaken the responsibility of looking into this particular area. Therefore, he �, HUMAN-RfSOURCES COMMISSION MEETIPdG, MAY 7, 19$1 PAGE 3 felt that the Human Resources Commission should get ready to do something in this ar�a.''It need not be done right away, but it is something that should be looked into, particularly in view of public health. With'the cutback in funding, he fe)t the citizens may have to get involved a littte bit more. In the future, he could see where the Human Resources Comnission couTd be very helpful to the City in this area. Ms. van Dan stated the Corrmission may want to set up "security" as a long range goa1. � . S200 - Assure that all persons are able to secure the basic human necessities required to maintain their highest potentials for health. Ms. van Dan stated this could fit under "securit " or "human services" as a goal: S400 - Reduce the probability of fire and other'disaster, effectively respond to their occurrence and remedy their effects as quickly as possible. The Commission concurred this goal was related to"securit ". V200 - Provide an effective system of government capable of ineeting the changing needs of the corimunity. Y210 - Provide government functions adequate to meet the needs of the comnunity. The Commission concurred these directly related to "communications". The Commission reviewed the goals and ohjectives of the Human Resources Commission and selected the following goals: 1. Communications 2. Numanities (including Fine Arts) 3. Human Rights 4. Social/Economic Development - categoriied under "Security° 5. Human Relations (Youth/Education) - categorized under "Human Rights" 6. Human Resource Delivery Systems (ChildJDay Care Centers) - categorized under "Human Services° 7. Human Resource Delivery Systems (Library) - categorized under "Humanities" 8. Information and Referral - categorized under either "Communications or Human Services" The Commission outlined the fol]owing goals for the coming year: Introduction to Goals (Section 6.132): The Human Resources Comnission shall act as an advisory conanittee to the Planning Commission for continuous community planning and development of comprehensive City goals and policies. Any change in re]ated conmunity p7anning and comprehensive City goals ar�d policies must be reviewed by the Planning Commission who will then make recommendations to the City Council. �� HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION tdEETINf, MAY 7, 1981 PAGE 4 Introduction to Goals (continued) The Human Resources Comnission shall advise the City Council, after a policy review by the Planning Commission, in the develop- ment of programs to give increased effectiveness and direction in implementing established City goals and policies and recommend actions as needed;to provide equal opportunity in the community. Purpose of the Human Resources Commissian (Section 6:131): . The purpose of the Commission is to promote intensified cor�nuni- cation and protection of just and equitable rights amona al] residents of the community; to promote harmonious relationships among people of all races, religions, ethnic groups, social/economic status, ages, gender, physical, mental and emotiona] disabilities and diverse life styles; to promote understanding and equal oppor- tur,ity in employment; housing, public accommodations, and public, cultural and educationai services; and fu}1 participation in the affairs of the City of Fridley. Areas of Concern: I. Humarr Rights Goal Statement: Protection of just and equitable rights, the gradual elimination of all forms of discrimina- tion; and the promotion of harmonious relation- ships among all people of our Community. Long Term Goals: A. Looking into the establishment of a grievance procedure. B. The promotion of harmonious relationships by means of education-an�i discussion. Short Term GoaTs: A. Gather information pertaining to the establishment of a no- fault grievance procedure. � B. Review of Affirmative Action Program of the City of Fridley. * II. Human 5ervices A. Funding B. Accessibility (* Because of the absence 'of M11s. Noble and Mr. Goodspeed, this goal will be discussed further at tile next meeting.) HUMAN-RESOURCfS COMMISSIOW MEETING, MAY 7, 1981 PAGE 5 III. Comriunicatian Goal Statement; To provide public information to all citizens of the City of FridTey and to improve canmunica- tion within the Community. Program Objectives: A. 'To ensure that the citizens of Fridley are informed of governmental actions. B. To provide a system/method/means for more citizen input to the City of Fridley: C. To ensure access of information to all citizens (TTX). D. To assist in data collections to ascertain the needs of the citizens of Fridley. Methods: ' . A. Reports of coimnission action sent to Fridley Sun, Fridley City Newsletter, and/or cable TV. B. Encourage attendance of interpreters for City Council, public hearings, and co�nission meetings. C. Invite speakers and arrange far public discussions. Speakers to include minority members, disabled, gay activists, etc. Make sure that invitations to attend these public discussions are sent to members of the business comnunity, the School Board, and City Administration. Ms..Van:Dan stated that discussion of the Commission's goals and objectives o-�ill be continued at the next meeting. 3. REPORT -0N INTERNATIONAL YEAR Of DISAB�ED PERSONS (IYDP): Ms. van -0an stated the IYDP project corronittee had its organizational meeting on April 21; 1981. 5he asked Mr. Boergerhoff to� give a report of that meeting. Mr. Boergerhoff stated the meeting was well attended by people living at Village Green, but not well attended by other disabled, except for one man. Concerns expressed were pretty much confined to the needs of Village Green and the major concern was transportation. They agreed the first thing to do was find out how many disabled persons are living in Fridley. Mr. 6oergerhoff stated that in checking, he fourid=that Anoka County has no idea how many disabled people there are in the Cour��y, flor does the City of fridley know. He stated a state-wide study was done in 1976 by the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation that looked very thorough, and the results are as current today as HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION ME6TING, MAY 7, 1981 PAGE b they were then. At that time, it was estimated there were about 31,000 people in Anoka County who°perceived themselves to have disabilities. The disabilities are defined as functional disabilities, rather than the medical definition of disabitity. In the seven-county metropolitan area, the prevalance of all dis- abilities was at 162%, statewide was 14'Z%, and the rural areas was 12z%. The pro- portion of those peopTe who'would be disabled would be essentially the same. Mr. Boergerhoff stated that at the meeting, they tried to establish some clear- cut needs to work on. They felt transportation was something they might be abie to do something about. He stated they would like to come up with a sample question- naire asking people to list disabilities and needs. 4. OTHER BUSINESS: A. Accessibility Reports Ms. van Dan asked about the status o€ the accessibility studies the Comnission had done for city-owned buildings. Ms. Cayan stated she had gotten the catalog the Council for the Handi- capped had put together on contractors and hardware suppliers for the kinds of things that were needed for City Natl. The more calls she made, the more confusing it was, and the more she realized it was a job for a real expert. Not only does the City have to put in the correct equipment, but it is aTso legally liable for the correct instal7ation of that equipment, attd there have been law suits going on throughout the country. She stated some of the contractors she talked to recom�ended that the City hire an exp�rt to come in and do a thorough accessibility survey. The contractors did not recommend a city staff person or cormnission taking on this kind Qf job, She stated she and Sid Inman, Director of Central Services, will be working on a report to pass on to City Council. Ms. van Dan stated their goal as a Co�ranission now is to encourage the City to continue in its efforts to complete the accessibility r�trofit. B. League of Minnesota Human Rights Annual Meetinc� Ms. Cayan stated the League of Minnesota Human Rights was having an annual meeting on the theme: "What is holding up Human Rights?" This meeting will be held on June 19-20 at the ColTege of St. Thomas and the cost is $25. She asked if any of the Commission members were interested in attending. Mr: Treuenfels expressed an interest in attending this meeting. MOTION BY MR. BOERGERHOFF� SECONDED EY MR. TREUENFELS, TO AUTHORSZE MR.. TREUENFELS TO A2'TEND THE LEAGUE OF MINNESpTA fiUMRN RIGHTS' JWNURL MEETZNG ON JUNE�.Z�9-20 AP7D TO APPROVE THE $25�EXPENDITURE. - UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL.VOTZNG AYE, CHAIRP�ERSON VRN DAN DECI.ARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNRNIMOUSLY. � . � � . HUMAN RESOURCES COMP4ISSION 14EETING, MAY 7 1981 PAGE 7 � C. Older Ilmericans t4onth Ms: Cayan stated the City has been informed by the State that the Federal Government has deelared the month of P1ay as "Older Americans Month". TYie'City t4anager has asked the Human Resources Commission to look over the information and if they feel it would be appropriate for the City Council to declare the month of May as "Older Americans Month" for the City of Fridley, they should make that recommendation. � MOTION BY 14R. TREUENFEIS, SECONDED BY MR. BOERGERHOFF, TO RECOMMEND THAT �� •-$'NE MAYOR OF' �FRIDLEY DECLTiRE THE t10NTH OF MAY AS "OLDER AMERICANS MONTH" � AND MAKE Tl1E�.FOLLO:�IP7G PROCLAMATION: � . WHEREAS, average American Iife expectancy has increased dranratically; the years added to most people's lives are significantly broadening Americ��n society. A whole new Iiving generation has been added to our families; 2ike every major social advance; Iongez life brings new challenges; 2onger Iife can mean greate,r personal happiness, and greater fvlfillment. Ftowever greater Zongevity enhances our nationa3 wealth and we2fare only if we know how to put the added years to good use for society; and WHEREAS, we are just beginning to see what older peopZe can do in the conm�unity, in our political and social institutions as they exercise their power not just for themselves but for society as a whole, in their roles of elders of the tribe. As a result senior citizens are becoming a significant po2itical power; we also see greater inuolvement of older people in the corrr munity, heZpiny to soive cormnunity problems, bringing a sense of service, a sense of continuity to a society in which families are a11 too often fragmented and need to have their generational ties reinforced; and WHEREAS, daring 01der Rmerioans-MOnth, we shoaZd examine oar commanitg, asking: What opportunities o2der people have €or involvement in civic life, for active sociaZ and cultural life, for further education to keep up with a cha»ging world? What are the opportunities for employment, for significant vo2unteer service? What kind of life can ol.der peopSe expect to have in Fridley? �� BE IT RESOLVED THAT, as we celebrate� Older Americans's Month this May we also recognize the efforts of 1oca1 seniors who have provided leadership to the citzzens of Eridley by their active participation in civic Zife through such programs as Congregate dining, senior choir, Friendly Fridley Fo1ks, . � Senior Citizen Forum, and Senior Outreach.� � � . � � - MOTION BY��MR. TREUENFELS., SECONDED BY MR. BOERGEF,HOFF, TO AA70URN THE MEETING. UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL�VOTIVC dYE, CHAIRPERSON�VdN-DRN DECLARED TIIE F1RY 7, 198Z, NUl•!AN RESOURCES COi'lAfISSION bfEETING ADJOURVED AT 1QrI5 P.A1. Respectfulty,s bmitted, � � Ly�trte Safsa .�� Rec,ording 5ecret�ry CALI TO ORDER: CITY OF FRIDLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETING MAY 12, 1981 Chairperson Oquist called the May 12, 1981, Corrmunity Development Commission meeting to order at 7:4� p.m. ROIL CALL: Members Present Members Absent Others Present: LeRoy Oquist> Kenneth Vos, A1 Gabel Connie Modig, 5haron Gustafson Bill Deblon, Associate Planner APPROVAL OF APRIL 14, 1981 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES: �. MOTION BY DR. VOS, SECONDED BY :1R. GRBEL� TO APPROVE THE APRIL 14� 1981, COMMUNITY DEVEIAPMENT COMh1�ISS70N MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON R VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE, CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. . ' 1. INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS Mr.. Deb�on stated he has not yet received any direction for the Co�nission as requested by the Co�mission in a Motion at their March 10, 1481. MOTION�BY DR. VAS, SECONDED BY Mft. GABEL, TD CON27NUE DISCUSSION ON THE INDUSTRIAL REVSNUE BQNAS GUIDELINES UNTIL DIRECTION IS RECEIVED FROM CITY COUNCIL. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CNAIRPERSON OQUSST DECLARED THE MOTION.CARRIED UNANZMOUSLY. � 2. PURPOSE OF COMMUNITY DE4ELOPMENT COM�lI5SI0N: Mr. -0quist stated it would be difficult to discuss the purpose of the Commission with two Comnission members absent. Mr. Oquist stated another question he had was if any discussion has been carried on with the City Council or City Manager regarding the purpose of the Community Develo�ament Commission. Mr. Deblon stated he did not know of any discussions. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSTON MEETING, MAY 12, 1981 PAGE 2 Dr. Vos stated that the City Council has monthly conference meetings. Would it be possible for the Commission to request some time to discuss their purpose with the City Council at a conference meeting? Mr. Oquist stated that was a possibility. MOTION BY DR. VOS� SECONDED BY MR. GRBEL� THAT THE COMMUNITY DEVEIAPMENT COMMISSION MEET WITH THE CITY COUNCIL DURING A CONFERENCE MEETING IN THE NEAR FUTURE TO DISCUSS TNE GOAIS-AND OBJECTIVES OF THE COMMUN22Y DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION. � UPON R. VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE,�CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � � � . MOTION�BY MR. GABEL, SECONDED BY DR. VOS,.TO CONTINUE DISCUSSION ON THE PURPOSE OF�THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, RLL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON OQUZST�DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANZMDUSLY. � � ' 3. OTHER BUSINESS: Dr. Vos asked what was happening with the bike trail through Locke Park and along Rice Creek. Mr. Deblon stated the lafest information he had was that the County had hired a consultant to do the study on ti�e trail alignment. He believed that study had been completed and the County will begin construction on that trail during this construction season. They project that the trail system through Fridley will be completed by the end of the summer. Mr. Oquist stated there has been strong opposition to the trai7 by the citizenry. The main objection is an 8-ft, wide asphalt path with 2 ft. of grass on either side, plus another 8 ft. of hiking trail and about 7 bridges across the Creek between Locke Park and New Brighton. Mr. Oquist stated that on the next agenda, they should have an update on the bike trail system. It should almost be an automatic item on every agenda so that the Commission members are:kept up to date on all bikeway/walkways in the City. Mr. -0eblon stated the bikeway from Mississippi St. to 69th is supposed to be cpmpleted by the end of'June. ADJOURtJMENT: MOTION BY DR. VOS, SECONDED BY MR. GABEL, TO AA70URN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICB VOTE��ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE DfAY 12, 198I, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETSNG ADJOURNED AT 8:00 P.M. . Respectfully subm'tted, Lynn �Saba, Recording Secretary City of Fridley APPERLS�COMMISSION MEETING - TUESDAY�,�MAY 12, 1981 � PAGE 1 CALL TO ORDER: Chaixtvoman Gabel called the Appeals Commission meeting of May 12, 1981, to order at 7;30 p.m. . ROLL CALL: MembeYS Present;� Patricia Gabel, Jean Gerou, ponald Hippen, Alex Barna, . Ji.m Plemel Others Present: Darrell Clark, City of Fridley APPROVE APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 14� 1981: MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Hippen, to approve the appeals Co�nission minutes of April 14, 1981, as written. UPON A\702CE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRNAMAN GABEL DECLARED TI-IE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. �� VARIANCE REQUEST PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK POR AN ATTACHED GARAGE FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FEET TO 4 FEET 3 INCHES, TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN 18 FT.�BY 20 FT.�ADDITION ON THE BACK OF AN EXISTING GARAGE LOCATED ON LOT 2, BLOCK 2� MELODY MANOR 32i ?�DDITIO:J, THE SAME BEING 7478 JAQCSON STREET N.E. (Re4uest by Ronald E. Nekola, 7478 Sackson 5treet N.E., Fridley, MN 55432). Mr. Ronald E. Nekola, 7478 Jackson Street N.E., was present. MOTION by Mrs. Gerou, seconded by Mr. Barna, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN�.GABEL DECLARED THE PiJBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7;32 P.M. . Chaixwoman Gabel read the Staff Report: ADMINISTRATIVG STAFF F2EPORT 7478 Jackson Street eI.E. A. PUIILIC PURPOSE S�RVED BY REOUIFtEP:E[dT: � Section 205.053� 4; B4, requires a side.yard adjoining an attached garage to be not less than 5 feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide space between individual structures to reduce conflagration of fire, to provide access to the rear yard for emergencies and to limit the condition of crowding in a residential neighborhood. B. STATED 1i11RDSIiIP: � "We want to build an addition of 18 feet by 20 feet onto the back of the existing garage and the existing garage is 4.3 feet from the side lot � line.° A�eals Commission Meeting - May 12 1981 Page 2 C. A!]t4IIJISTRIITII� STAFF REVIEW: The"existing house and garage were built in 1968 with a proposed side yard setback of 5 feet on the garage, which is on the north side of the lot. The attached garage on the lot to the north was proposed to be 5 feet from the coranon lot line resulting in slightly less than 10 feet between existing structures. The proposed garage addition would not be reducing the distance between structures. The existYng distance between the two gaYag'es is 9.S feet. The Building Code requires 6 feet, therefore, if the Board moves to approve this request, staff has no recon¢nended stipulations. Mr. Clark showed the commission a photograph of the area. Chairwoman Gabel asked if the addition was for garage space or family Space and if Mr, Nekola was planning on putting windows on the north side. Mr. Nekola said the addition was for garage space and he was not putting windows on the north side, he was putting them on the �outh side. He said he will hire the work to be done; that the sidinq will be stripped back and staggered. Chairwoman Gabel asked hi.m about the overfiang and he said it will come out and run to the existing overhang; tfiat it will look like one structure. Mf. Barna questioned the stated hardghip and Mr. Nekola said they have two driving teenagers and an e�ctra car and they have alot of stuff to store. Chainaoman Gabel asked Mr. Clark if the code was different when the house was built and he said it was the same, that the builder or surveyor was ofP about 9 inches. Chairwoman Gabel asked Mr. Nekola if has talked to his neighbors and he said that his neighbor wrote out something and he filed it; said his neighbor had no objections. Mr.Clark could not find it in his file. No one else was present ior this matter. MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Plemel, to close the �ublic hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING�AYE, CHAIRWOMAN GABEL DECLARED THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7;40 P.M. MOTION by Mz. Barna, seconded by Mrs. Gerou, to grant the variance request to reduce the side yard setback for an attached garage from the required 5 feet to 4 feet 3 inches, to allow the construction of an 18 foot by 20 foot addition on the back of an existing garage located on Lot 2, Block 2, Melody Manor 3rd Addition, the same being 7478 Jackson Street N.E., Fridley, MN 55432, with the stipulation that there be no windows on the north side of the new addition. iJPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. . � � 2.� VARIANCE REQUEST PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE THE F�VERF�GE.FRONT YARD SPTBACK FROM 39.4 FT. TO 34.9 FT� TO AL � A 22 FT. BY 5 FT. ADDITION��FOR SOLAh F.NEP.GY,�LOCATED ON.LOT 7, $LOCK � SHADY OAK MANOR, THE.SAb1E BEING 1567 FERNDALE AVENUE N.E. (RequOSt by Richard Bjorklund, 1567 Ferndale F�venue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432). Mr. and Mrs. Richard Bjorklund, 1567 Ferndale Avenue N.E., were present. ..a,�- Appeals Comnission Meetinq - May 12, 1981 Page 3 MOTION by Mr, Hippen, seconded by Mrs. Gerou, tO open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE�VOTE, ALL VOTING�AYE, CHAIRWOMAN GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC �HEARING OPEN AT 7:42 P,M. �� . � Chairwoman Gabel read the Staff Report: ADMIFIISTRATIVE ST11FF REPORT 1567 Ferndale Avenue N.E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED IIY RPpUIRG"4FNT: Section 205,153, 2, requires that in areas with setbacks greater than the mi:nimwn, the average of the setbacks for buildings within l00 feet on eithes' side shall prevail, with a deviation allowed of six feet more or less, but in no case shall the setback allowed be less than the minimum of 35 feet. . Public purpose served by this requirement is to ensure that any new structures do not greatly impede the front yard "line of sight" for the existing home sites. 8. STATED HARDSHIP: "Solar addition must face south to be effecti.ve. That side happens to be the street side (front of the dwelling). The existing 6 foot 4 inch overhang shades our main floor windows so that we get very little warming ef£ect £rom the sun 10 months �out of the year. S3e are coimnitted to energy conservation and the eXisting portico slab is in need of replacement." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEY�: Staff has no stipulations to recotm¢end if the Board moves to approve this variance. Mr, Sjorklund showed the commission a photograph of the home pointing out the large overhang and the area that needs to be repaired. He said the iolans were prepared by a solar consultant, EnerTex, Inc. and showed his plans. Chairwoman Gabel asked if he would be settinq glass panes out from the overhang. H�'said it is the same as constructing a frame, it will be 5-1f2 feet from the wall and that in the future they plan to add a blower that will circulate air through the top floor of the home. The glass will be reinforced thermal panes. He said he and his wife like to keep plants and presently they do not have enough sun coming into the home; and that the neighbors on both sides have no objections. They will have someone do the cement work and someone else do the carpentry. �, Plemel asked if the addition will be used for anythin9 else and Chairwoman Gabel asked what would happen to the wa11. Mr. Bjorklund said it will be used mostly for plants, sunshine and warmth and th0y are doing nothing with the wall right now. Mr. Plemel asked how much they expected in savings and Mr. Sjorklund said about 308 without putting alot of money into moving the air. A eals Coimuission Meeti.n - Ma 12, 1981 Pa e 4 Mrs. Bjorklund said they had experience with this at the previous place they lived. Mr. Bjorklund said it is called passive solar heating and they are in- �ulating the slab. Mr. Barna suggested that he might want to get crushed rock and pour slab over that; and that later on he can blow air down there through the warm rocks. Mr. Bjorklund noted that in;some cases that can reverse itself: Mr. Plemel said he is goin9 to drive by when the addition is finished. Mr. Bjorklund said they will have approximately 180 to 200 feet of glass. Chaizwoman Gabel asked what type of frame would be around the windows and he said it would be cedar planking. Mr. Clark asked what type of glass it would be and he said it is tempered patio door glass. MOTION by Mr. Plemel, seconded by Mr. Hippen to close the�public hearing. .UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMP.N GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING.CLOSED AT 8:00 p.M. MOTION by Mr. Plemel, secoaded by Mrs. Gerou, to grant the variance to reduce the average front yard setback from 39.4 feet to 34.9 feet to allow a 22 foot by S foot addition for solar energy, located on Lot 7, Block l, Shady Oak Manor, the same being 1567 Ferndale Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE��CHAIRWOMAN�GABEL.DECLARED THE MOTION CARTtZED UNANIMOIISLY. 3. VARIANCE REQUEST PURSCiANT TO CHAPTER.205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE� T0. uFnticF Tx�:� i�OnIitED SIDE YARD. SETBACK FROM 3�FEET� TO 2 FEET, TO �ALLOW : BLOCK OF A 20 FT. BY 22 FT. DETACHED�GARAGE ON , 6400 Able Street N.E., Friaiey, MN 5D43G). Mr. Edward Caillier, 6400 Able Street N.E., was present. MO'PION by Mr. Plemel, seconded by Mr. Barna, to open the public hearing. UPON A�VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING�AYE,. CHAIRWOMAN GABEL DECLARED. THE PUBLIC � HEARING OPEN AT 8:03 P.M. �� . � � Chainvoman Gabel read the Staff Reportd ADMIIdISTR1ITZVE STRFF REPORT � 6400 7�Ule Street N.H. A. �PUBLIC PU�RPOSE�SERVED BY REqUIREI+IENT:- • Section 205.053, 4B, 6, requires a minimiun 3 foot side yard setback for detached accessozy buildings. • Public purpose served lay this requirement is to maintain 6 feet between xear yard adjacent structures to reduce conflagration of fire and to limit the condition of crowding in a residential neighborhood. It also allows room between the structure and lot line for maintenance oP the structure. B. STATED iIARDSfiIP: "OUr desire is to build a double garage rather than a single garage.. The progosed garage location would recluire a one foot variance of the cqrrent three foot Code requirement. The variance is iequired since by � Apneals CommiBSion Meeting - Mav 12,�1981 � Page.5 there are mature shrubs and related landscaping on the south side of the proposed garage location. Not obtaining a variance would require significant expense to remove mature shrubs as well as additional Yein£orcement of the foundation area." , C. ADPlINISTRATIVE STAFF R�VIE��: If the Board moves to approve this request, we would reco�nend that no p�indows be placed on the nortli wall and that it also be sheetrocked since it will be closer than 3 feet to the property line. Also, there shQuld be little or no overhang on the roof so that the roof water falls onto the petitioner's property. . Chairwoman Galiel noted that under the stated hardship there should be some reference to the iact that if they were to build anywhere else, tIiey mi4ht have to re-do the entire back yard because there is a big drop on the property. Mr, Caillier said he talked to his neighbor and he had no objection and that his neighUor has his attached gaYaqe right next to the lot 1ine; between the roofs, there would be 6 feet. Chairwoman Gabel said there should be no windows on the north side and there would have to be a fire wal L Mr. Clark said it would be 5/8" sheetrock on the inside. Mr. Caillier said he had no problems with that and that a contractor will be doing the work. He also said it will be stucco to-match the house and he is planning on a one foot overhan9 so that it would still drain onto his lot and the roof will match the house. MOTION by Mr. Plemel, seconded by Mrs. Gerou, to close the public hearing. UPON�A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN.GABEL DECLARID THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:10 P.M. MOTION by Mr. Hippen;,seconded by Mr. Pleluel, to approve the variance to reduce the required side yard setback from 3 feet to 2 feet to allow the con- struction of a 20 foot by 22 foot detached garage on Lots 14 anci 15, Block 3, Florence Park, the same being 6400 Able Street N.E., Fridley, MN 55432, with the Stipulations that there be no windows on the north side, a fire wall on the inside and the overhang no greater than one�foot. tJPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN GABEL_DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED-UNANIMOUSLY. 4, �VARIANCE REQUEST P[TASUANT TO CfiAPTER 205 OF THE £RIDLEY CITY��CODE, TO � REDUCE THE SIDE YAftD SETBACK FROM THE �EQUIRED 10 FEET FOR LIVING AREA� ��..-TQ�.8.8 FEET, TO ALIAW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 20 FT, BY 22 FT. ADDZTION� � ��ON THE BACK OF AN EXISTING GARAGE, LOCATED ON LOT 5, BLOCK 3, RICE CREEK . �TERRACE PLAT 4, THE SA2•lE BESNG 6810 - 7th Street N.E. (Request by Richard Fischbach, 6810-7th Street N.E., Fridley, MN 55432). Mr. Richard Fischbach, 6810 - 7th Street N.E., was present. I�IOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Plemel,!to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN GABEL DECLARED�TE� PUBLIC HEARING� pPEN AT 8:12 P.M. Appeals Commission Meeting - May 12, 1981 Page.6 Chairwoman Gabel read the Staff Report: ADMIPJISTRISTIV� STI�I'F REPORT 6810 - 7th Street N.E. A.� PUI3LIC PURPOSE SERVED IIY REOUIREMENT: Section 205.053, 4B, requires a miniunt� side yard setback of l0 feet Por living area. Public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a minimum of 20 feet between living areas in adjacent structures and 15 feet between garages and 2iving areas in adjacent structures to reduce e.acposure to conflagration of £ire. It is also to allow for aesthetically pleasing ' open areas around residential structures. 8. STATED HARDSHIP: We are requesting a variance for a family room addition onto the back of the existing garage which is less than 10 feet from the lot line. This addition will add additional living space on the main floor which is needed because of a small dining room and kitchen area. It will also add extra room for a finished family room which we presently do not have." C. ADMINISTRATNE �BTAFF REVIE.SJ: The house to the south is 19.21 feet away £rwn the existing garage. The new addition will be behind the neighbor's house, therefore there will be more than 20 feet between living areas, unless the neighbor also adds on. The staff has no stipulations to recommend if the Board chooses to approve this request. Mr,-Clark shocaed the commission the plans and a photograph of the area, Mr, Fiscfibach showed tfie existing garage and said there is a 6 foot overhang on the back of the house which will be utilized with the additional family roOm. He said there will be french doors with the patio on the north side and the exterior will be e�cactly the same as what is on the house. He then showed the co�nission the plans for the inside of the house and said his family really needs the extra eating area and that the existinq patio will }�e demolished. Chairwoman Gabel asked how far out the bay �„indow will be and if Mr. Caillier has talked to his neighbor. He said the window will be out about 18 inches and his neighbor has no objections. He said he will hire the work to be done and wants to start around the end of June, Chairwoman Gabel asked if the windows would be a problem and Mr. Barna asked if they would have a fire wall between the back of the garage - and the living area, Mr. Clark said there would be no problems with the code with the windows and there will be a fire wall. Anpea.l5 COttl[R1S51011 Meeting - May .12, 1981 Paqe 7 MpTION by Mr. 5arna, secoaded by .�ir. Hippen, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICF. VOTE, ALL VO`PING AYE, CFiAIRWOMAN GABEL DECLARED T�-IE: PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 5:23 P.M, MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by t•frs. Gerou, to approve the variance to reduce the side yard setback fromthe required 10 feet for living area to 8.8 feet, to allow the construction of a 20 ioot by 22 foot addition on the back of an existing garage, located on Lot 5, Block 3, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 4, the same being 681.0 - 7th Street N.E., Fridley, MN 55A32. UPOC7 A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN GABEL DECLARED THE�MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADJOURIa7ENT: - M02ION by Mz. Basna, seconded by Mr. Aippen, to adjourn the.meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIR�90MAN GABEL DECLARED THE APPFALS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 12, 1981� ADJOURNED AT 8;30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, ,�-� '>�� Deb Niznik, Recording Secretary �i � f�YtWli4 'F �i\f.W�LT�i�W2 �� ..'-,. - DqRY 13, 198� �,,n ��., �. �� 't#+e Niay 13. k9$i , �ark f, � ,� . s , ,a, ;• W �� -;� "';' '� �.n _ �d�au. Parks b A �i; P�&1fS��.& RE�CR�RTit1A1.' � s'I.i: — �'e.� i% 1�1dPCh tls: 1�� t� , ��,;��1�t PARKS' & ., f red'th�: �'[nutes €� �'° �..,.�ppr�s�red as aeri�*�: � at�t! , tu:- the agei� � � �a�^k ; larrd : �t�l��Park Z£fll ti11.��Lf1E .d9.@J#itS� � � � A �� F X Y: � '. �F . �tion Gt�#ssian meeti.rtg ��eC: Q.�6IC �fl�Iflt�s r�- ;Di rector 5I01� M� INUiES r,. �; ��fi Parks & `R�Cr.eatiton Ctmmi�sio� '"New Bas i ness": ��rt - Larrv 8e�'�-�wQUld 34srz.�ta��c...rru�Cr yy-..... i vi �. !#lt�. � i �: x�. : �:: �" � . „ -u,.�., _ �.�� ., u_�._ � � ,. .. , ; , - � � , z � ��; PARKS &'REGR��1TiflN C4t�+lISST.4�i��T�NG. MA1` 13, i�81 -F�GE 2 i.�, �C�R `PRQGRAM��R��R'f �-, LA�tt�Y��$E{VDEL� i�IR�TQR QF F1fSA S6CCE12 PEti�C�RM: A Mr.` 8e�ifel sta�ed tMi� is ��n#tr�h, orgar�i�et# y�ar a€ tk�e soecer pragr�im. He �` stated the a�^e stilt growi ��'vhat, eve�t th�€U tfie ur� er a es dre dr Y � 9fi Y� � 9 aPPip9 off:�. 'Fhey '#t�a�� increas�d �}� ��er of p] ayer�, iea�its, � and gam�s �i's year. � They r�nuld-like'to �t�nmend �#�� i�a�r'�CS & Recrea�ion Cot�ifission for'. havd�g.Dr. Boudreau �� = artt� Mr. Kirk �j'sv� ��r�m t�el� �r� se��i�g up � a fie�d, beca�se ir� tlt'� (sast they have ; had 8 prob}et� in ge�ting s9�cer #4�lds. They;�eel they hav� a�er,� ��ci soccer pr�gram, thafi�CS tc� ti� ef�o�� u��flr. Bou�lreau- anck Mr. K-�rk. � MP: 8enr#e� -handed e€u#� � sh��i shc�ir�g the n��ri of pl�yers� nurnber of :tearis,; �i�raEfe� �f ho�, g�m�s�. the �&�e�ee�' fee>.and the�� proposed Pa�ks �&.1§ecreation sMare. He •s'�ated �he, FYSA: �rou�d"�ike the. Par#� & Recre�tion DeparLm�r�t' Go con- tr'ibtt�e=towa.�i3�ihe re#erees� f�es�as they hav2 in the pa�;, ,Th� Fcidiey Youth Str�c�r- Assticiaiiot� �ta�s vr� �Trt� ov� $i,63Z `ir� referee �ees tliis.yeat*, and they woultl,l�ke the �ity 'h.o pick t�p $3��[Z0. This'4s based on �8l9ame, per referee. He stated �his was somewhat af �a ir�re�ase over la�t y�ar where the C°ity'� share-was ars�ttncl $754?. The i.n�rease �5 dite;;'�� the referee.:fee going from $7/ gaC�e to $8J game ar�d the � inerease �i.n nttls�#�r :af games and t�ams . NIr.��Bendel ��s�Ea�ed��th�s is �e see§�nd year`€or arr�all �i�,'�s �eam=zn rthe �"under }4'" caieqt�ry�. __.fn the "�tader�t�". �e1,�unde+~ i�1" cat�gor9es, ��the hoy�� ar`� �g#i^7s pl�ay �oge�her. ' : "° Ur, Bsudreaa stated �fie Ci't�+<_`s share in the r�eferee fee is abont a�40p increase awer �t�� was cort�EwifSUted 1�r5t Year. He statea" �hey usually try to stay as close as-�h�y.c�n #� 50� �s �he referee�' f�es in ��u#haa3 and baseball. �15�: �lughes siaied tfl€s is t�e kind af decis�r��r �re Cmm�'Fssic>rs hr�s .ve-ry }ittle to say atrou�G, otter �tbd# fi�.? �� an ih� capi.tal �x}�errci�[tures in th� btdd�et. She ` strgqested that Dr.<-�suelr�ac�. and Mr, Bendel sii down aY�d work= aut an arrangement agreeable tQ bath k'e`�ardiia�:ttie �ity's share' bf: the referees' fea�. Br. Q�udrea+x stated�re wn��l,he �rSlling to wt�rk With the Soc�er As�'s��iation with �he Go�pnissipn's ap�roval;,�:K#� was hesitant t�r set a precedent #ur ttre next year, tse�as��e theY do� na�:�+tr+vt �h�� tf�y wit7-��star�d i'n ttie next year:�vt�th��uiiget��cuts. Nls: Seeger'�s�ated tl�et whe�ii�s�ceY' €irst start��l� ��t�� Go�ren�issiafi rea3iy wanied� to see the soccer;pk�gram;:�#ce ofif, and she tha�rght the Co�iss�'op a� �hat iime' fel:t 1t �vas an im�r`#ant ��tion t� tfie Ci�y's rect'e�tion.. � Pls; _Nur�hes= stated �i�aG 6r.; ;Boudreau and 7�r. �del s#a�uld get �og�ther' and negoti ate the C��Y's' share af �#i� re��ees+.< f�es. �_ �. � :�; � � �� tdr; Y�9 st�ted that a�x�`}�� kfshever the Soceer �ssa�idtiori or any other •gt'rc��s �cafie in> h� y�ould ��e ta"see their b�slg�^�s, �he'breakddWfl bf k�ow doalars � a� 3�S�ni,' in.addiifon t�r�se r�quest for fctnit'��g. �: �: �, ,° r�- � � � � �.A.._.� ._ _ �_� _._,.�. d __ , ;.�.� ��± �T�°;��:` .�.._�: P�t"�.; f 2. € M&» �� ; ��:� = �'��ra' ��. �i�:t�te i�fi i t ##��: t� tu�l�i Ms.; J � F7��+' pa�se ,: =--�h�y: Ms,- ,� �ri�i h �rti �� . .�s,`: d uri%'3 M�, �}�a or eii area t �� .� � '_;��., � � �� `�� , ��,.�` �� f� �I;_COMNISSiOT� ME��iN�, MAY }3 �'.�$� .., ` �� PAG� 3 ; � ,g ,, �, . „ �5 s�at�d the sac.�w program very much euem�lifies the kinds bf things i�ssit�it is interested in, such as instructiottal, working with tite kids,, � both gi;r�s and bpys:, and thsy do play toge�her. She felt the Gt�mmission tanted to encourage this kind of 'activity'. �he thanked I�1r. Bendel for ,v the meeting. !��<.�han�ed the Camnission for their time a►�# interest. ��f - CiTY PURCHASE PROPERTY FOR FARK: : i�`s�ated this peiition is a request for th�, Gity to-purchase tfie property . rrea north of Hillwind Drive, east pfi Po7k.:a�d avest of Fi]lmore, for one or the fctlTowing community'uses: city park,: drait�age easements, recreationai tr schoot and others, naiure center area, ice skating pond, and warmir�g �his petition was submatted to tfie City ,Council:: She stated the petition �-item has s�xn� history, and she would ask ihe people in the audience to Lhe histflry as it has really been initiated by the res4dents ir� this parti- �ea: . r Een�Gtt stated t#rat originally the�r g��#.;s�arte� out to stop a rezoning to R-3 for �n.7P0-unit apartment buil�ting. This request went before tl�e �;Cammis�ion, and the P7anning Commissian.=voted unanimously agai:nst the �. Th�� then att��i�ed the Housing & Ctedev�lopment Authority pub3ic hearing >stabiistunent of a i�ore Lake Redevs7opment District, in which this area i�d�t. fihe HRA,a�rprav�d,the District, and sent it an to City Council, and �� 1ce Redeve��r�i�t �istrict was estafil�siaerl by'� th� City Council at th�ir tenring. 7he r�ez��n3,� prpposal on that pr�perty was recailed by OYlie Ericksnn ` realiaed the app�s:itinn of the neighbnrh�od.. She stated petitiAns were � i�e,City Cavnsi� �rcxn the neighborh�d,,;�� the rezoning was reca7led so not icnow whe�'e tk+e City Couttcil st4ta� bnr�h�t. : _ tenscsn stated. �he3� attended another #�I�=.�i)fi�'fic hearing on the Tax Incremen� , l�he HRA"appt�ov�d it and sent it an�#�i �[�y Council. The City;Gauncil it w'ith a ane-year :s�rorator.ium on thi�-�CO�er'ty. The resideots hive said nnt want to see development on �3s=.1�t�L3.only green space. �nsan staied the neiqhbors met w1tk� Mi�. �riekson after his rezaning recall, zffered ta sell them the property =ar��i stat�d that if they real ly, wanted tt�e t far green space, they shou3d reqt�est the City to purchase the land. She :�ie;y t€�tsk ftim seriousiy and that ts the reasan for the petition. Two weeks ;y gaue the petition to Dennis Schne'idar, t�+eir Go�ncilman, and then tfl'the tnci i . �ensGn stated the mnratorium hasically sa�s that no tax increment dollars into the'devetopment'of that property. ',Mt�. Erickson can develop it, but he �it�ing io deveTop the land without the rezoning. �€nst�n stated they.are asking for the land to be purchased for park property �t�age tvith the possibility of water contrnl. There is an existin� pond €t°c�ich�s"water qverfl aw prior to going tq Maore Lake. The neigh6ors are �o take an assessment against their �Srop�rties-for the purchase of this �t��rstated-this area has wildlife and is a nice place to take their children .,:, , - - . � .� � PkiiltS .&�tE�Ti�Ailati ��I N�f'E� t3G f�4A•lf 13-c�'�1 � PAGE 4 and to t+ave a qu�et ��me. :"�re 3� a lack af �ark azrd open g��eA �pa�e in ihe �eighborhoad. fuery�iting fs deu��eped. She 3tated it is ac►ross•;ti�e �treet,frs,m a� Nor�th Park� Eleme�tar,�i aa��:#,#�: s�k�tro� ground p�s `a }ack��of reer"�atfi�nal ��p�c�:�� Mr: Larson, R�`incip2�l,of N��tfi Pa�c, has said:i#iSt if. �h� lartd was opened up for `°�� , u5e, he wau7d-wet�ort� the��c�p�,rt�r"�t�5ties te tai(�e Childreo_-across ��the str`�et ty� #.f�e<�rea. , M,. J�rg�nsc� stateci �hey wtl� at� be going �e�c+re t�he �olumbia Heaghis School 8pard te di:s.�ttss th�ossib�rtit,y � their carotriliutliig ta the purchas� of the lar�d. 7herr� are�s exis�ing fe ral funds iDv�;�the�.eh��wgeraen� of the�ponding area' as a vrater r�ter�tion basin l�fore th€ water goe� inta Moor� L�ke. She ttncte�stossd thai t�e pr�nd is t,�er�n�.tn doub7e in size. �� ;" Ms. Jorgensnr� stated the yre�rr �ce, would nat tf6 we}1 �tsr the develo�ament of ' apartmants. Their neighbar��d,c�not tolera�.��y more dert5e population in _ t�t!`�=o-f traffie. T� ��Tyyt�l �cess stree� �i� Polk 5treet, and'the �ity is c�i�ct�g.�rri: the exi s�'� �Cra�fi � pf"obl ems .` �� _ � . � '. f�. Jf,r�€.msort stated�k�y a��e ehecking on tbe possibili�y of Coy[nt� or State funds. �� Ti��s �s� heirtg pursi�t��t�Y�� Fa�sett. 5he =stated� she �pnke td S�.d "Tnman, TreasurerJGity Cler�c� afi�t4'� �irtdn�in� tfia` la�d,-and Mr. :Tnman s�at�r4 he:.believed sa�x hond monies m�i�tit �bc� �*ai tab�2 for ihe �rcfiasa af �he Tantl. . �r:' Bpudreau=stated �hat M� "I��na� had wriit�r%a mems� datec��1ay73, i581,'stating � ttrat i� is':�at.l��l:�"to usc� e�es� money in '�e.l?ebt-Service Funds; A31 incomes ;, � to=tlQbt �ervice FuF�� mus� b� segG�egated ini�=that fiUrfd �and ,remeir�,tfier.e ur��i7 � the bor�d �is pa#d a�'#,ec,mpl�t�Ty: �=0nee pA`+d tk#f�, �any exc�ass �as�� fias a�crued � .�' ir� that.fund:ft�m ir�e�ting �r any other sourse.may ihen be �se� for.�i�y purpose im-w��c#r �i�e Cit,��cii��<�e�ires-, .� , . , _ t ,; ,. N�s.. Jergenson stat� she h��t a1 sa' tal ked'to hl�. Boardma�r, C4ty Planner,: and � ° P4r: $��rc(man did rrci�?feel ,�here was any #sondir�g money a��i'kabl�: �oth Mr. Ittman : �, er�:i�h^.. Baardman a3�d her��o appt�oach DY?. $c�ad�^eau �nd �sk'him ta check i�rto the e; �.� ' �CCr�s3�3.�7ty a€ fur��g. S3�e sta�d the �seigf�wr�iaod is.�vil#ing,tt+ vr�rk witE� ihe 7�` _ �i�y toward the pu��as� a� this �and. �^: 8ob Prois stat�d>,th�'t 6r^a�kl,yn Park �s in tfie process of apprs�vlt�g an area �or a B#IX (Bieyc}e l$titoct�� tra�k. Thfs is� �st a� suggesiiotl��f�r �om'ethirg the � � '!a�?d c�suld<be used �sr, I� deve'��ped for th� �e, �taricing wou7d'be �vailable " � by<�the �rea� �estat�.c�f'��; � ' �� , a : ,; � "� �� ' Dr: �oudreau stat�;t►r�re �5 qu��e a steep ris��on €he soutt� end to 1#itlwind Rd. ��, . if'ttte pond is made �Iarge�, he-�d not �ee v�e�e'th�5 �arcei o�€ Tanc! v�ouid fit in�3:�t� Citp'S Coin(�"eh�rnsfiYe��kt�. Theq h��5 a�reS��Qf na�urai park; at Norih � , °Iptis�Zt�k t,hat the3+;hape t� '#e�it� as it is. Tk�re #s k�ackm�nn Park, Moore Lake. .; i9�td �lso the schooT,�proep�ty ih=�hat area. Aa�her n��uNal ar�8 br.another ut�ai�rtainabl� ar�;aJ'ks n��t.�€� overa�'� C�t�he+��i�ve Plait at tktis time. -''` ��:�� _��;.-_ =�� ,��' : �s'. Hughes statezi federa]';�n�ey �s availa6l�,tc� figt�^e out h�rr'ta 1�edo Moore �C� aAd �t tt c��ed ti�� ee� waLer- qva'k�ty� st�ad�r`d&::� ThaY°i�tc�udes the � ta}t�€�" ��+t�a� a�'es5. � �r�� aclude�- �rrC�a��rB �sa ,saz�ens�� d!�pih af this � 1and. � � s��e� ��." ta�. ��r�� Y�ct come� ��n� �Fr�. fihere.'�s the area they _, - °�, � Y , , �.s� '�.s ,�' � � -� .. � ,� , � = : " �. � `�� - � � � � ` '� ^�. ' m -��e-�n � � .': t 3 ` � aa�.. . . .,e. _ a . :�=m.�s� � .. �., .,,� , �, , _ ,&. ��.��=. . ... �o-�- �. . _ .. _. } _ . __.._„_. _ . y9�'t y _ � ? > + � t � P `�s F r� k: ; g y'�-3 �,^�f ' �; ��' S tfE z`3� cY - % :a,�ts' 4 � `' -� ,,.� : .. t s" �i " +�y }'4� .: 'h..�.2 � Y.. �`§ i. � Y a� N'T r% yti�,2� T�� 3 � J ' �. . � � f § v ' i'} : � �'4 � ' . � , �/ ` d. `�' - T#� �r .�y$µ� .,�° ^ . �� I�i �7 �� 7'� :� °C'� ,3 7•;'�">'4��. �� ..�r�'a' ' . ' 1_ - ��, a �hr�` ' -" . . , S i� : �se�ne r�d�€�� in an�t a��'��.and tt+e G� €�� d� e� Fi:na��'<��:,�4� that. A�_ ke,y �.t� [�ore lake �Rede �� .;� ` ., l��ng _apa��s.+�r►�tfiis prop��ty �t.i��e wouid be some t� r�r�&» ��;,� � ar�as n#�t�ii redevetopmer�t-��r�,#� can bQ the� start�r�� xtrir i��reme+�� ict:� �s ��`, �C eu�t��if the �orrding�a��«i�• do�irled. thsre�wouid �° � twyC�F"� �i,te�4i.�iackmat►n Par�. � a�: .. , t .. . . .:, gga�ste� �� yass�bi�i#,y af se3lfir+g k��ck�nr��.#�r the"d�.*v�]oprs�ni #�,�� '�� p� ,��13s #�nd far paY�cfian� *;��`� f � �z: . .. � ;��fi,,,r�SEGg�SRr ��;�C+:,$g F1R. YCitTtZ�; �°.�- .. TXE PfiTITFON 2+2985 T� . �'�'Y T£# �F'it.i�'��5: � PROPSRTY �Y�° a�i�>:�� "UP HILLktIN�+DR. � ;E�IST. �F ' �' #�F FSLS;�p� �d'�1`5 - e,i'�- �",�.=, � � i YE7�'�', ALFr ��G hYE; CH�IRPSTtSOX.'E9JG'�ES TaECLARED 27Y£ MOTSY3#' �� _; r'�,�a: . _ - - *�� . . . . .. . ... xi.. �ed si�!:liked tfie suggestiflr� o� s�Iif�9 Hackmann and buying tlt�"s` !i#s. a.�v,��,t�.��at�anqe? � � � r�t�ted ^►f he was, given a cha�c�, T�:�uld retain Hae[cmann:9r� iis ' �, �i�:�ick,nti� knti�.how much u�a�rl�w�,'te t#iere would be i� this `r ��f� erea was do�b7ed. .t��Cmann: is about 4-5 city lo�s, apprtl�c�� s> . Ihere �s alse-alv►a3's app�si-�#�m qit► a neighbo�hu�d w�er� ihe `: „� �t�� a�r "parkland� " , ; . � .;.� 1�IDR.T'G�i� SECQNDSD BY MS. SE�'rls'3Fr °.2� CONTINIFB TIiE DI&CUSS.�ON ON T&$ 'P�E `GTTY TO°i?�iRCH1�a, ^E, P84P�R'!'Y F� F�K ADTB TO REQIl.�5R' YitAT SR'�' �T�-2`NG .�z2�'�3�7l27tN+i; < ��fO& .P�`�GL* . ' ; � �66 Gt7PP1Gt7;&��!3't3� '�" ;�'-;c�szxc ��:�� ax w�s� �'�t'� ror�n , . - � � -�� '' ��' � , �- �x � �.' - � � � �'y- A�- �G AYS� CBAIRF'E��A£ � DECIdlRfi'D T7tE" ilOT.FON CARRIEI� ';. ; � •---�;, �ri; t� 3�op antC �tr. & Mrs. Pro,i� for coming to the me�t�ng �� .� Dosra#ion �irea,u. �L�te� the previous Frida�;,_�ledtronic prese�ted tltE City >�20�sDg(t. $1.Dt1,000 is al►��dy in,the �nnk and the other �700,OQD°: ��adg�ed.fdr {��y�ettt.,during Mecitros�ic`s'ne�ct fiscal year--$SU,fl4o on ��:�J�1, at�c#:$��,f�3.�:�sn APri�� 3fl., l�. T-�is mon�Y'was de5ignated� ��purc#�a�.%ir� ltghting #�r :tE�� {�i�r�rig.f.ields for<�ridley's �#��°:t"at�9a. °P1�tiy�ect, ' '� . 3 3 '�� w ,u � �� r f ".s'...:3 j: F u. �K _ � .� �i L� - _... �� p ... . a____ _, -x.�ve_.�a..__.,'��.�. _..,�, .. , n . �...,',i� : �r 4-. , r RRRKS 6� REGREATION C13MM�SSI�f i�tEEFIN�r, MAY 1�;= 'i98T PAGE fi b. Kni,qhts af Col�ttbus �onat�oh Dr: 9audreau sta#�e�.'�Chat �t the last City Council rr�eting, tke Blessed �ir�in Mary,C?ounCi't`,�f th� Columbia k#eiglits Knigktts of Columbus donated a'tata� s�m of $2�;�, ��0,000 �0 6� disbursed :this year, and-tbe remarnder`of $i5;fltifl'=ta t�e disbursed at ,the rate of $S,OQB per year for the r�ext Lhr�^e.yea:r�. Th�ty also had'a resolt�tion that this tnoney be �� designated� ft�r tMe� �c�mnun�t,� �Park Projec�. � � c: Ja�+cees Qo��tti an J)t-. Baudreau stated thai on March 9, the Fridley �aycees presented the City Councii �i'th �t checknfnr $3,000'wh�ch represented the first helf of a two-y�ar piec�ge to.t�e used to pu�^chase four �lectron9c scoreboards for Lhe neW at�iet�c comp�ex. The Japce�s askeri;the City to acknowledge two stipu]at�`oi�s. ' � 1. 7he°scoYehaards will be the praperty of the Gity an� they °� �� '� wil� prvv��4� for`the mafntenanCe, insuraflce, i�nstallation,�� '` and<ahy o�t`er casts which may exceed the pledged amount. 2. The. Frir�7ey, Jayc�es wil'! be �tlinwe3 to att�ch a sig�►, at th�:�r expe�t�Q, ��t designate the; scarebGards we're �onated by: the�J�Yee�S. Dr. Baudre�u,staxed �e thirught the Cot�nission should be kept aware of =� � these don�%ipn�., 'He-stat�d prap�r ��ters of th�nks^wiik �ie sent to�each argani aati orr: Ms. Hughes'��a�ed't��t ane year �go, �he Commission said that one a# the first prioMities=w�s to finish North Park, and that it ought.to receive sdme attenticin. I� Staff;is going otrt and soliciti�g irwnay, they should "` be #reating the vrh�le sys�tem togethe�, rather ttran just on� individual p�t�ject. It.appea�ed to f�er that everything was g�ing taward the Gorrrnunity Fark Project-at tfi�s poin� when Chere is prnhab7y a need in }ots of other areas. Ur. Boudredu,stater� that,part of the eancept behind�the.C�unity Rark Praject was "to sbl�cit ct3�ttmunity'inptr'C and supp4rt tu build tkiat�aeility.- -- To date, the3� have"cpme tsithin $300,QbU af doing that. ihep also sell `.- their entire. sysie:�+ when they sel7 the Gomnunity Park cflmplex. ' He thought � a statement �aas mai�e that this Ctunmi�sion, along: wiih the foWndati�n, wau7d attempt to raise �Eunds for'North Park. He would be g7ad to repre- _" sent the Gammissior� �r the Founddtiotr w�enever he is asked t� do that and `$ se13 North'Park. � felt;cpnfident ihat Mr,.�t. Claar:and Ms.:Valen were dning a fafr?y cc�i7ete �ob of outlir�ing what needs to be done at North' Park. He s�ted t�.i�Sp easement mart�y is e�rrnarked f�r Nortfr Park develop- ment� They k�ave dpprtaaehed the Ja,�ce�s, th�r`sOlieTted a day from "The Sountls of �4c�ie Ya��tt for Christ" gru� to �ut sad �in �ap af the building, they have �Z�n �ta'��'��,�iCtg'.work on deepening.t(�e pond. !He .stated North Park "r has aot b��n�forg��r�, �nd they�are pr��resstiry��on sctiedu�le.�� ,t =a , ,� +: � , 4 � . . . _.. � �e . � � _ � �$ 3� '`L � .�' NuS�N_�.�v ... � h� � �. . � . . . . . . ..�..� :. �i _...,. � � � �. .2 s, rt t3 �2y, i "3n-`t�`'-�'x l�;�i+tl�� E x ::'; " �, 5 . .� +� `' .•_ . . .. S53 (�l 'S ised for- t:: � t was ^oject; or ;�J 9s . t3►E <�i��^ �etn. ��ri� a,yst.ciu. re�c,� she-'as�reed with N GfiYt� �ti�t th2y 1Y3f aiot�td,�ga �fter �t niere�t; but she` att j�ki�f Ne�rtM-Pat =I�e was afiso ue�d�r` that :Mr. St..:Cl�� Sr Nor.th Par�C,:as h� ��n3t�e wFEer� €fiat � �a� �at their �iext n o.. �:': 't' "" � pF ark Project. Qn th� he cap" f�r� Fr9tl7e,y i� appears their are step-; . .. . � . .:�`h: ot��anizatior�s> th�y do :�cel:7ent slide pre�entatia�. .�haL this Co+�ar��ssi� d_id �e �?xoject co�pi��e�"ly �t�i,�er�-",. � i '� �rn,jeci. She agre�l &�''��ajects °�= � fifte Dresenta�i�ns, tts� ;r= ing'of individua}s tryir�g;to� �mp7eted. - ; oat �lorth Park, b�cause er xrhatever is ne�dad ta ' rk i�sr�ession. � ��rentTy working an ;a 7isi ��. , :�s tttiem. It �til� ba t�g.t� t�4;: :,�4ti#ill go. � ti.t�, she �roul d l i ke a s,i^�a#*�, c� `~ :HdS -lR PlolTdl�.�r�dP,€ w�LiE uur:l�a,.,, iyec��a c��,., .o�+t..�•�,,,• t��.••�•.x.•�.* . - i�� ths,#.�ai -fii�ishing, inc�at3!%t�•ivais�,r. �nd sear�r, parkf�g lo�; a�. : sup� �sta�e4r��d�ialsu �ilce �Q �e � ��ide pres�nLation that �� `' ,. a � � �9 i^k s,�st�tn. ,, �,�ts '� t�a�i�s and �rgan�zat�� '� �' "�'�i�+��ssi�irt� 19c�rksxwD ' � �ud�`e3u �ta'Let�,a ;$aard end ,Commis�£�`s,��lo�rkshop sponsored;by ,the ° ;: �G�;.�€f��;4!ti .�i�d_ Yark Rssuciatia��r�a i'1 �e he'#d on �lay 3fl froro � �� m.�.;�o.3:3ti;�p.�, a� Hyland�'Nii�s C#��-�et in Bloanipgion. ]ie staied .;� i�€ a»j€ �� tt�� Ca�ission a�embers r��rs i�terested i:n attending, ihey ,�,: d" �et�him k,�si�t by, �9ay �2. - _ x� £ ,~ � Y � .� _ n „ __ . .,.� . . � z x '".� ,.�., . .. � , � , v. .�� _ :� - �s . PAR� �.�:�#E�R�{Li'I�N�'�C�'tIS�IYT% e - 1982 G�pital imProv�n ��. 8ar�dr�aU �tatad 1 � � � 6utlay for :1�2. T�# ` Pur�-1982, �..�� k��aould 1 IItts11�S �itB.�::�RtiTE��4� ��i��fE ` suggestions�-t��im;� the item,eni# �a gu�si torretate a�'F�:��ies� ' 3ook at, He �t�t�id 't�i �ommission's ,�une mea Ci t;y Counci l�he ertii figu�es �rrd'wi�at the� Ms.�'��Ht4g��s ��sice�t �h-:. intends ta sa� to #fha fi. CottanutritY Reci�eatiDt� Dr. Btrudrea� �tated i Coamissaon d�� farwaj minutes of 6Fa�ch 26 1 recflmmendatit�t.. He, 7 th�t �n order to aiak4 almost Lhe �ire.'i+�tt within their �al�n'i� Dr, :'Baudreau. �afied , �Iack Nanserr; �9� �n ,� Recredtion Go�t�ssfi�� Pa.rks & Recre�t�an �t �eferendum wca�ld l�et1 qf the City Counci�,� '.�k��buildi.ng, they;� impro�ements a3ong:i� the� P�rks �&�Reti^�a��t a referendum as soort Gouncil that ihcy a3i el�ct3on as�; �1s..p�� of severai ,t�� ihe .�� it st�nd or�.'`��s own'� Dr. Boudreau statQd: back io the,.next Ci�, a rcferettd�ta �late �c� need�d far :� .refi'ereti� staff,he sta�ed th�;� be pushing ia imfo� _..�,_� � � .�.>.�: _ _ .,__ ME�_T�NG> MAY 13, 1�8] PAGE 8 er�t Request hat i�ictuded 3n tkre agentla packet w�s � Capital �r are•,.in the prescess af working on the Capital Budget ik�' the Commissiori-members to think;of any improve- to see in the er��#re park system and suk�mit those Ne wauld like the C4mmiss�ion members to list just imate"on the.priee would be F�elpful; �fe will #hen tems �nd comp7ete Ane list for the Go�nissior� to ed th;#s infe�inat�an abaut Jur�e 9-lO�pMior to the _ iit�g. ` He believed .Staff is supposed tts go to af June with a rau�h presentati�� without dollar- hope; to accrnnpl �s�i,' i� 1982,: Boud�`�au to butl�ne for the ne�ct meetir�g what he �it,�=Gounci 1;. Bu# 3 ef� n4 Update k�e Ctiirmissian'sfiar�ld>be aware that the P�anning � t�e;Parks & Recreation Coi�inission 5pecia7 meeting e Gity Gouncil for i#��rr corisiderai6on.without_a hrrught it was the P�a,nning Gommission's re:asoning a so3id recammenda�ian, they would;have to repeat k af ihe citizens ctammfttee'and fel'k it ttas not= res}�sns i b i l i'ty. we��. ago Mor�day,`t#ie Ci,ty Gouneil ree�ived a report hie camplete repor� �ftis ccammittee did fQr the Parks & with' recom�ttendatiQns from that cominittee 'and the tamissian. There were s4m� questions abo�ri when a eld, He thought �here was s�me feeling On the.part h8� �f they are c�ging to a referend,uro.io finance ould =ine1ude som�,mo�jey ¢or.:nei�hbtrrhood park � �� h it. City'Gounci.l asked for a recor�n�ndation from ��artment, and he sairl they woutd tike to go with as perssible. It was the general f�elfng of the City 8 s��not wish it tct get tied into the political �rr�th iby the eitiz�tls ccmpnitCee. It was the feeling �� at�d oiher'inembers thai they would Ti[ce to have �ri#"as Mr. Al1erF h�d s��ted at the sp�c3al'meeting. hat r'egarding th� time }ine, he was asked ta come �ourscil meetiag witV� a re�ommer+da�ion far setting the.`bui�dirrg anc� ttie aa�to�ant of �rtQy t�rat mighi be um. In ta]king wit�;Mr, Kirk and tiFie rest of his €elt:that tb have i,referertdum this;year would_really the general public of �that'9s going fin tfte building. � t ,, . ,: .� ,; � _.�� . - � . . _ _ _ ,�-_ �� .��. �._ ,`.r� �#�=wou1 d retwi �i'�.aPPcavai, ch. Ka s� for answE an answer" wcts. ;he ihought the Cornnti �;< < ��- � s�.�o�t slemb�rs �vncurred that 1 rer�im: ; Tfsey-f�lt they=shoul� c�a��+d '�i�� s� arch9tect be r :�WQ�`F� " rai l , ai 1 hri dq� ai r ars� ral. T sippi it ;c,�y . Resole €'n� g€��;1e�ways and Walkway �. s'�a�ed Ehis atso gnes ths* ��ngs in Lodce Park. S!� - .�: ,, �� Cauncit, with E xefi`erendum for t h d k im r �„vor oo par p .,...,........,. witl need time �,n cane up �i� 1 need comparri sor�' wi th r`s.questions. He v�3uld '�ike �iscti3s the neigh6urhood ��planned park impravements �rea�led to again 7o�k at �f�ize th�nt;again. This k� eco�In�nd to Gity Council �nd'referendum in �rcier ta � was a good time for a z`.; �th;the whole package and :�5s€ore the bond referendum. �.. _;; : ;; �reek have formed a�groep Y�* at .Qudl i ty�� .: When the CauritY . t�� trail along Rice �reek, � side of the ratheC'wfde creek, ��t what was being done. Wh�c �rt#y.was pla�ning an puttirsg - f�'asphalt btke trail with 2:ft !�'Greek betweeri Locke Park -to yet down into that a�°ea _ . . � �ew ;Brighton bnrder. f€ f f�c'�t: ni ght ��with th� Ri c� -� r�t�otie; the bike traiT. They '� �tbfii� }t�aring so they can.aar eC�nai:se in the area. . Qne �tf y tey :did not knav about the [ be#ore`the City Eouncil, and ',;; 9$�,'"A ResQlu�ion af the :a3 G4ncerns'in the pesi�;and �e Rice Creek &asin": ��{cs�'Park, and there are three = ; �..�he Cauunission shuuld ask r;; � � � �:r� PRRK�: & RE�RE�7IDN LC1t�MiS5I the Ci ty ta r�vi ea�o because she d�id not Locke Park r�as ��pC The Commissi�r memt and the trail plan` Ms . Seeger 5#.at�t s residents ar� caltt I£��'seems £he �asidf s0 she felt 5�e sMc MOTZON BY 1�3li: S`fltJi�C- 63-19BI. ' UPON A UOIGS'��t3TS, MOTION CARRT�D I1�YAt+ Ms. Nughes s�ated : t#ie fact tha� �he ;i the Rice Cr��1c`�f��t the"p�tentia� �x4�` 5. NEW BUSiNESS: a, fl�ction of Qfificer Ms. Hughes declares Ms. Seeger nelmin8ti Ms. Mughe�;,tt�c3itt�r Mr: A11en ns�ir�a°�e� Naaring no �iher rr� MdTtON 8P 1� 3.'df�i FDR DAVE Kd�7RIGt6 i FOR d981-82. tiPthV A VdiE�. irU7��; MOTSON CARRI�II UNA, Ms. Hughes c#�c'ldr� Ms. Seeger rramirr�� Hear�ing na �th�r � �: ,� � -- � .�� -� t+�€'�IN�, M14Y 13, ]�81 c ;PAGE 10 e plans for tfie �#�ree bridge� in Locke Rark, hink three bridg�s �titfiin that sfiort space:of ridte as there is, dlreac�y one br9dg;e. s ag�ed they wo�tld :lfke t4 see th� bridge plans �I�i� �.ocke Park,� , �tntrTd like to s�� he �ota1 system plan since ` her`�t her home and asking about;the County plan. s Yrav� no one at the County level they €a�r ask, d at least be aware'af the,system plat+. SSC�IVDED BY NS. SEEGER, TO R&CSSVE ?tE54�'1KflN NO. L VfJ.�'NG AYE; CttRS1�sI'ER5QN SUGHES D8`CLRRED .7'HE Q1I.�I,Y'. did:write a letter as an i'ndividual, bt�t mentioned a met�ber ofi the Parks & I�ecreaiion>Copsnission, to hEd .f3oard statin� sl�� was r�a11y concerr��d about {�ro�rl�ms and the dest�^oyi rrg of natural erea. f.or 3981-1982 .fie nominati�ns open for-chairperson. Ms. flughes for C�airpersan.�- � � � �� :he nQminatian. iave tfandrick for chairp�rson. natiDns, Ms. Hughes decaired the n�rminations closed. 5JiCC(r�NND£D BY :MR. RL�P , T0� CAST A IT3�ANIa�tOUS -.. BALLOT. . !�HzS1`RPER50�'' OF TI��$ PAR�"5 �r RECRERTTGW CQMMI5SION C ;E I+LtTlNG AYls', CH$I#PERSlJA7 RtiGHES DEGLtIREII TRE ' ![iUSLY. ;he iiominations i►per�`for aiee-chairp�rson. Ba�ara Hughes for vice-chairperson. t��t�ons, Ms. Nughes declared the nominations c7osed. �z�, � - v . y.� �� t — _._ 5 � S,` _: � ;: +�`� .t�7'iEFsAFi 38�9NDED $1',i$�.'; t'B�AR'i�'��l'�' r -: FOR 17�'CS"Y� G F6R .i� 2,.., � �� : '� �i� #{yL VQT3NG A1�S� C�i E��;� 1N�JSSiY. u i: x f°�~��zse . reement Ga*� �, r: ��or�3.Y. �t Request - Fr'�d� E� n an:srderIy-man�er.` ' . YtiUNG. S�EAP7DED. SY;A4i; kE Y C ��r�::.. �.. 52 � ::. .. ) i:j! >PA6E=�fi` ` ;� � ��; _.< , '.IY7 CAST A UNANIMO&T& i�lY' OF THE PARKS & ttEC�'i'Ii]Pf , '�3N HUGAES �DSCLdRED �TIfE fi�f Schoal r_Grace High Schooi for ° �� ie siated 9t was�� h#s ;�aent. He has tal ked to the :#�ias u�otild not affecst th�ro, ,tl�e_lease��is ngt renewed. >:-` �; �#�e hackey rink that is �;�chool �:si ie so ;�it i� � � � ehi 1 dren at the 'scha�� .s:�-te :ar was 770 children, ilte . : '-l�r' TF? R&COMMENI� TNA'$ THS `-'�7�� IiDClEEY RINK LOCA2'ED A� , C� :#IFiGX�3 �. DSCLARED '1'HE � ''" �14�h1etic Association ' �, �'�et%c Assoeiatian is again ncnt to be heid on Sat., >� kseen recQgn9zsd as;:being _ � t. He �tated that in the ' � ciean-up and rvn `th�ir � RPPROI+B TAE SOFT$ALL �2`XG bSSQCIRTZRN. : � YA�`�i ALi: i�f33'IHG Ai'E, C$A7Ri?t$�GiN.Ht76TISS DECI�ARED �'h[F , ,_ , z �23 i1N�k�I.�Y. a` for both th�se •ace Higfi Schon! �v,�v �� t�zt., �+ S,�.hOQ1 : e�t5, he would reco�nend to3d that'the fields are as has been kecor�nded 'GE- 1�VS±4/V�RK�,.4J�+< .s:sn r 3lstrhq I}I�L xcY�SLCL+��.G4. �� vrv ii c J.na.4^�.V�f , r ii�a.E-. ,-. �as. . � :° ,Ce t x'� ' = s, . .. . ... ... .. $32�°.n!�:C,v�r..... . . ._ . �x..��.1±a., P�RKS &#dECR�ATION �3t3t�M��5� , t�EEi`ING, MAK 13 :198I PRGE 72 UPOP A TfOZCE 6tO2`E��:�:A'TsL V�',!'ITOG AYEr ��RE'ERSOIV HCK'.SSS DEG`LAF2ED�TXE � � .� �. - �MO2ION �CARRZSi} UNAN�U�LY'�.. �. .. . �;.. �. . � e. NSP Easement 7�oney.. , Dr. @oudreaz�=��a�ed��,�is was discussed earlier ir� the meeti.ng. >He stated the :$i=�U,04t3.Pt5P Easement mone,�. is in the bank. Tt is ear- : ma1^ked for �i�r�� '�k use by City Caua��l' direettan. . ; k" f. Request to Fetice ?aY,�„_k .L.and' ' �� Dr: Baudreair st�ted khat Mr. JerQme P}aehlitt , who tiv'�s��.i4t1Q� 76th Ave. N�.E., has f�equesied the City tb fenee fi,ue.ft. af a 10 ft. — _ aesess that t#1e Cit,� has on Nayes St. �h�t runs across his backyard. Dr. Bnudrea�"`�tdted%this is a 10-ft, t��tkway strip that .the City owns t�-a piece �f.lariii'tacked �^opert� tHa� i� earmarked as park pro�erty tF�at is rea}i� r�nd�'�e'topec�. Mr. `Mactititt stated t#�at in � discuss9on � wii6� Cttrt �Datr�berg,;�irey fgund o�� the�^e �is also:a 10 ft: a�eess�- on �� 75th Ave. as well as.a 30 ft, util:iiy.and drainage easement cQming in off' Bacnn Dt':' and 76�E� Ru�., both'�f tN�ich provide easie� access to the park proper�y�, Mr;;#�ack�litt stated �hat the access he; is requestinq t�� fe�ic� pr��n�?,�� a c�zb�e TV� as �ve't� as e telepf�on�� compan� unr�r-� ground po�t:- �ecau�� of �his and'the��ic�ighbor's fenee, ths ae�ess is onty 9 ft. .l�+dther` �easan far tf�� request is because tdr�: Atachliti hes a rara a!£ �7:trees alonc� that easer�znt that would req�ire transpl:anting. Dr: Beudreau ��ted`ne vtodld reeommend tl�is request to encroaeh:upon the Citjr's waiktva�y ��se�tent•� denied. Ir� i�e euent there i's a future need � to tlevelop `tk��' p�t�-�an�t�` the Ciiy wi3� -need ihe entrance and access to the praperty. H2 s��ted"they can te11 h�: Mach1'itt that the Gity wo�rld be happy to r�:locat�;.his trees ai��r.the treespade. MOTl01� F1Y Alt�; KO!'�DRyT�K� SECOWDE'D Z3Y A$2, 1'1�Z�7}T� TF) DENY THE REQUEST FROM `�'' ..: A1E... MSthki'�t, TO �.Fis"IrtCE "S:FT. OF PARK Z,�74Lt. . �. � � . . . . UPQN R Y�i� �,i+'OTE� `�� Vt,}�:ZNG AYE� CHAI32�PERSt7N Fi71GHE� DEC',7.71332ED��THfi " .- , MOTIlJN CARRILD UNAFt�'�S£r�`. �� g. North Park ��rk�n9:�c��t - _e- � �� ar. Boudre�U'p�eSeri��;t� the parking iat pian �'or tdorttr Park tc+ the `�� Comm9ssion.-,�i� �t��d they feel they.have come up with a rec3�ed,plan that would',�� cos�.as mu�h as th� one �Mat �as originally.d�awn up. � He'stated thff "g�e��,�7�nat�� cos't on �iis,_parking; �ot is '$2�,OQti.� � This propose� pa€�k��i� �vt.-plan mei with the appnitval of the Co�nfssioo, iX ` � � , .. u ' `a�.. .�. �s� .A �_....,., _ . . . , , _ ��' .-�.,:.�__ ��a�zt�r�re - ., .. .._. _ _ . . . .. . � - . { � �.x�,`°N .:�; a.,_ _!�' �,. �c �"z 5 � ; , � a�F ¢i4i�'µ� ; ty�°� �. ;. #; � m t.: . , r: �.::. �'4 .-u S ' k„, 4 . � .• � €,.-: ; - �.: . S) ,. <: S' .. .. .. �. .. . . .. ��_ �� °$2 q� � :i r: �_ .� � �� `t " � , �� .t:�� CITY OF FRIDLEY HOUSIP�G � REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PUBLIC HEARING MAY 4, 1981 CAf.L TO ORDER: Chairperson Commers called the Housing & Redevelopment Authority Public Hearing meeting to order at 5:37 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present Members Absent: Larry Commers, Russell Houck, Carolyn Svendsen, Elmars Prieditis, Duane Prairie None Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner Virgil Herrick, City Attorney Curtis Larson, Appraiser Mark Burch, Assistant Public 4lorks Director Darrel Clark, Chief Building Official Bob & Karyn Prois, 1060 Lynde Drive Roger & Carol Fassett, 1001 Lyrde Drive Roger & Shirley Frank, 5512 Fillmore St. Ted Burandt, 6217 Riverview Terrace Dennis Schnei�ier, City Councilman CO�VTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING OP! TAX IPJCREMENT FINANCE PLAPd #1 TO THE MOORE LAKE REDEVELOPi%IEiVT DISTRICT OPEP�ED OM MARCH 26 198 Mr. Commers stated this was a continuation of the public hearing on Tax Increment Finance Plan #l. He stated that Mr. Boardman, Executive Director to the HRA, would be presenting this plan to the HRA. Mr. Boardinan stated that at the last meeting on March 26th, the HRA opened the public hearing on Tax Increment Finance Plan #l. At that meeting, it was continued until the HRA's May 14th meeting. Due to the problems with the State Legislature as far as pending legislation on tax increment districts, they were advised by the League of Ftinnesota Cities' attorney to move this meeting date up, if possible. That required renotification of the public hearing. Mr. Boardman stated that in the front of the Tax Increment Plan �l docuinent, it showed all the notifications that were made. It has both the City Council and HRA notifications that were made for the March 26th meeting, and it has both notifi- cations that were made to the City Council and the HRA for the May 4th meeting. The City met the 10-day notification required by state law. He stated they also sent letters to the people who were in attendance at the March 26th HRA public hearing and the City Council meeting. As was requested by tlie HRA, they also put an article in the Sun Newspaper that was not in the legal section. �� HOUSING & REDEVELOP�4ENT AUTNORITY PU6LIC HEARING P1EETING, MAY 4, 1981 Mr. Boardman stated that at the March 26th meeting, the HRA received a letter from Jim Holmes, League of Minnesota Cities' attorney, stating that it was advisable to make modifications to the Tax Increment Finance Plan #7. Mr. 6oardman stated they have modified the plan. Mr. Herrick, Mr. iiolmes, and himself inet and discussed this new plan on April 30. This new plan,which the HRA members have before them,meets the qualifications based on what P4r. Holmes felt was an accept- able document at this time. Mr. Boardman stated he would like to go through the document at this time. They did not make any changes to the "District Eligibility" or the "Statement of Objectives". They did make changes in the map areas which showed the areas they are proposing to be included in the tax increment district, the areas south'and north of Moore Lake. lJhat they are proposing is that these areas 6e set up as a redevelopment district. In state law, they are required to establish one district-- either a redevelopment district, a housing district, or an economic development district. They are suggesting they set up a redevelopment district. The reason for this is because it gives them more flexibility in what can be established in the district itself. It allows housing to be developed without having to meet the criteria for low and moderate income housing. It allows commercial and industrial. However, that flexibility is only based on a rezoning action. Mr. Boardman stated the maps show the breakdown of laying the district out in phases.. By law, they have to designate development and they have to lay out the cost of that deve]opment and what it will mean to the taxing jurisdictions. At th15 point in time, they modified their initial proposa] to include Parcel 11, Lot 3, Auditor Subdivision No. 25 in Phase I. Because they have to lay out cost elements, cost to purchase and estimated bonded indebtedness, having this property included in the first phase would make it a lot easier. By laying out that area as Phase I, it allows them to handle al7 other phases as amendments to the district. It allows them to go ahead and get the estimated assessed value on that property and have that estimated value certified at the County. Mr. Soardman stated that at the time the HRA gets a proposal or gets a developer on these properties, they can amend the Tax Increment Plan thorugh an amendment process, at which time they will lay out all costs and bonded indebtedness. Mr. Boardman stated the "Financing Plan" for Phase I was laid out on page 6. It also lays out the proposed property for acquisition which is Auditor's Subdivision No. 25, Parce] 7100. It lays out the estimated cost for development of that property. This is based on a proposed development by another real estate office. At this time, there is no proposal for that property. Mr. Boardman stated that Phases II, III, IV, V, and VI Financing Plans are laid out beginning on page 7. In thcre it is stated that, "wh�n final determination is niade on property acquisition, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority shall deter- mine specific revenue and expenditure projections for that phase of the tax incre- ment plan and process it as a modification to the plan." He stated they have also ._�- HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PUBLIC HEARING MEETING, MAY 4, 1981 PAGE 3 laid out a general development plan for each of the phases. In all Phases I-VI, they are looking at some kind of residential development. In Phase II, they are trying to promote an o��mership/townhouse type of develoorr�ent. They are also looking at public improvements, which incluci,e water storage and those types of water filtering systems to P1oore Lake. Mr. Boardman stated the Phase III area is classified as north of the Moore Lake area, a large empty tract south of Moore Lake Drive, west of Old Central. The proposal for that phase is to promote a mixture of housing types. They have been looking at townhouse/condominiums, apartment complex, with the potential of elderly units. Because of the type of shopping and transportation systems available to it, this would be a good location for some type of low income, elderly complex. He stated this area will need a lot of soil correction work. They will talk more about this when they get into the statutory conditions of a redevelopment district. Mr. 6oardman stated Phase IV is the area across the street from Phase III and to the east. It is located south of Rice Creek Road, east of 07d Central. They are looking primarily at the development of siqgle family. Mr. Boardman stated that on Phase V and Phase VI, they have not made any determina- tion as to the type of housing that would be going into that area, They are looking at some type of residentia] development. That will depend a lot on the cost of the property as far as soil correction and whether the type of development that would be generated there would be substantial enough to pay for those types of improvements, In this area, they will be taking into consideration the single family homes that are presently developed behind this property. Mr. Boardman stated that on page 9 was the "Plan Impact on Taxing Jurisdictions". This is a requirement they have already.completed with the documentation of the plan. The initial documentation had more of an impact than it does now. They have reduced that impact to the school districts. The total impact right now is $736,554, with an estimated gain of $8,237,330. Mr. Boardman stated that on page 10 was the "Modification of the Plan", which states: "The Tax Increment Plan #1 for the Moore Lake Redevelopment Area may be modified provided the modification shall be adopted by the Fridley Housing & Redevelopment Authority and the Fridley City Council under the provisions of Section 273.74, Subd. 4, of the laws of the State of P1innesota." Mr. Boardman stated the HRA members also received a"Report on Statutory Conditions of a Redevelopment District (273.73, Subd. 10), Tax Increment plan #1 to the Moore Lake Redevelopment District", marked Exhibit A. He stated the State Statutes lay out conditions under a redevelopment district that are required to be met. Those conditions are: 1. That the land is predominately occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, or other improvements and more than 50% of the buildings, not including out-buildings, are structurally su6standard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. HOUSING & REDEVEIOPMENT AUTHORITY PUBLIC HEARIP�G f4EETING, MAY 4, 1981 PAGE 4 That the land is predominately occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, or other improvements and 20 percent of the buildings are structurally substandard and an additional 30 percent of the buildings are found to require substantia] renovation or clearance in order to remove such existing conditions as: inadequate street layout, incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit density, obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion, or other identified hazards to the health, safety, and general well being of the community. That the land is not predominately occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements, but at least 80 percent of the total acreage of such land has a fair market value upon inclusion in �e redevelopment district, which when added to the estimated cost of preparing the land for use, including utilities, if any, exceeds its anticipated fair market value after completion of said preparation. , That the property consists of underuti7ized air rights existing over public street, highway, or right-of-way. Mr. Boardman stated that in making a determination that this was a redevelopment district, they utilized two tests, Test #2 and Test #3. Under Test #2 (Condition in the report), he included Phase I, parts of Phase III, Phase IV, and Phase V. Within that test area, 20 parcels of land containing 27.1 acres are occupied by structures out of a total 24 parcels containing 24.2 acres. That meant 86.5% of the land area occupied contained 83% of the parcels and can be classified as "predominately occupied". Mr. Boardman stated that in this report, there is a report from Darrel Clark, Chief Building Official. The City inspected five structures which meet the standards of "structurally substandard". To meet the test, they only needed four structures. Also included in that report is Assessment Department records for six structures. They did not go into these structures because they are owner- occupied structures. He stated Mr. Clark is in the audience to answer any questions. Mr, Commers asked Mr. C]ark to give a brief summary of the things he found in his inspection of the five substandard structures. Mr. Clark stated that all five structures are bet4aeen 30-50 years old, In a]1 cases, these structures have not had nruch maintenance, probably since the day they were built. 1358 Mississiooi St. N.E., Lot 13. 61ock 1, S sLatea zm s house naa a rire in �anuary i��u. ine has been no attempt to repair the fire damage, The no foundation, and cannot be reoccupied unti] major Ualley Addition - Mr. Clark owner�ives in Florida and there house is very small and unkempt, repairs are done. HOUSING & REDEVELOPt�ENT AUTHORITY PUBLIC HEARING MEETING, MAY 4, 19$1 PAGE 5 __. _ 6222 Central Ave. N.E., Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88 - Mr. Clark stated t is is a rental house in the P District. It oes not ave city water and set:�er. To the hest of his knowledge, the well that malfunr,tioned sometime ago still has not been repaired. It has a private cesspool septic tank system which is not hooked up to the kitcherr. The house is 34 yrs. old and has not been properly maintained. The house is presently occupied. 1001 Hillwind Rd., Part of Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 25 - Mr. Clark stated this is in the area designated as Phase I. There was a fire in this house last November or December. Since that time, the owner has ripped out all interior walls and partitions. The house cannot be occupied in its present state. �In order to be reoccupied, the house needs to be repaired and present plumbing and electrical systems brought up to code, 1314 Mississippi St. N.E., Lot 16, Block 1, Spring Valle� Addition - h1r. Clark stated this is a welding shop. The building is a masonry bl-ock structure of 605 sq, ft. There are no running water or sanitation facilities. The cambination of defects and deficiencies are sufficient to justify substantial renovation or clearance. 6070 Central Ave., North 250 feet of Governmental lot 1(Parcel 2400) - Mr. Clark state t ere are two houses. Bot are rente an occupie . Bot ave been cos- metically refurbished in the last year. The front structure is the one they chose to include in this report because the floor joist system is overspanned and spliced in the mid-span of the floor joist. It is going to cost a substantial amount of money to repair and bring into code compliance. Mr. Boardman stated that for Test #3 (Condition 3 in the report), in order to make the necessary documentation on this test, they had to do two steps: (1) They had to get appraisal reports on the properties they v+anted to include in this documenta- tion; and (2) They had to get soil borings and engineering estimates on the cost of soil improvements. Mr. Boardman stated they did both of these things. He stated Mr. Curt Larson, Real Estate Appraiser, is in the audience. h1r. Larson put together a document which the HRA should receive as part of Exhibit A. The HRA had before them a summary of that document. He stated the properties looked at for appraised value are Area #1: Generally south of Rice Creek Road and lJest of Central Ave. and North of Moore lake (Phase III); Area ii2: Generally East of Central Ave, and North of Rice . Creek Road in the Northeast Quadrant (Phase V); and Area #3: Generally South and East of Lynde Drive and Polk St. Northeast and East and North of Hillwind Road and West of Fillmore St. N.E. (Phase II). Mr. Boardman stated they had an actual appraisal done on the existing property. At that point in time, they had another estimated market value done with soil corrections. They took the soil corrections based on soil borings taken and estimated engineering reports and put those together to give them whether that correction would be over and above the estimated market value of that property after all soil corrections were completed. The soil boring tests are in Exhibit A HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PU6LIC HEARING MEETING, MAY 4, 1981 PAGE 6 after the Assessment Department reports. There is a letter from Mark Burch, Assistant Public Works Director, who is in the audience a7so. In Mr. Burch's letter, the Areas #1, #2, #3, #4 are related.to the soil boring numbers, so Areas #1, #2, #3, #4 are Soil Borings �1, #Z, �{3, #4. The soil borings that were done for Areas #1, #2, #3, #4 are in the area south of Rice Creek Road, west of Old Central. It is in the Appraiser �eport Area #1 and is the City's Phase III. Area #5, which is Soil Boring #5, is in Mr. Larson's Area #2, which is the City's Phase V. Soil Boring #6 and #7 were done in Area #6 and #7 in Mr. Burch's letter. This is Mr. Larson's Area #3, which is the City's Phase II. P1r. Boardman stated that in Mr. Larson's Area #1, they looked at two market values. They looked at the market value based on commercial zoning which is its present zoning, a C-2-S and PD zone. It was Mr. Larson's opinion that the market value, based on substantiat backing within his report, was $409,000. If they looked at a rezoning on that property as an R-3 zone, the value on that property is $144,900. The estimated market value on corrected sites of an R-3 property is �y178,000. In order to meat the test of the State Legislature, Mr. Boardman stated they had to add the cost of improvement on that site based on the engineer- ing report, which is approximately $620,000. The difference there is quite substantial. So Area #1, which the City classifies Phase III, meets the test of the State Legislature. Mr. Boardman stated that in Mr. Larson's Area #2, one portion is present7y zoned C-1-S and one portion is presently zoned R-l. The estimated market value of the C-1-S property in Phase V is �145,500. The value of ihe R-1 property located in Phase V, north of Rice Creek Road, is $112,800. They took the R-1 property, looked at the value of it as R-2 property, and came up with a value of $124,100. These va7ues are prior to improvements.• 7he estimated market value on the corrected R-2 property is $152,300. They have a total cost on those tt�ro pieces of property of approximately �269,000 at the present market value. With the improvements, they have an estimated total market value of $294,000, which is about a$30,000 difference. The cost oF improvement for soil correction to the site is $111,110. Area #2 a7so meets the test of the State Legislature. Mr. Boardman stated that in Mr. Larson's Area #3, a portion of that property is presently zoned R-1 and a portion is presently zoned R-3. The estimated market value on the R-1 property is $39,200, and the estimated market value on the R-3 property is $6,700. For the highest use of that property for a townhouse develop- ment under at R-3 for the R-3 property, they are looking at a total estimated market value of �85,100. After corrective work, the estimated market value on that property is 5102,120, for a difference of approximately $17,000. Based on the engineering reports, the cost of imorovement for soil correction is $154,000. Therefore, Area �3 meets the test of the State Legis]ature for inclusion in redevelopment. Mr. Boardman stated what they are trying to prove in this document is that the cost of improving the property is going to be extremely costly, and this is one of the reasons they need a redevelopment district. HOUSING & REDEUELOPh1ENT AUTHORITY PUBLIC HEARING MEETING, MAY 4, 1981 PAGE 7 Mr. Herrick suggested that the HRA receive into the record the reports prepared by Mr. Larson and Mr. Burch and then ask Mr. Burch and Mr. Larson to explain briefly how they went about preparing their reports. MOTION dY MR. HOUCK� SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRZE, TO RECEIVE INTO THE RECORD THE REPORT PREPRRED SY MR. CORT LARSON ON "TAX INCREMENT FINANCE DISTRICT {�1 TO THE MODRE LRXE REDEVELOP1dENT DISTRICT PROPERTY" DRTED APRIL 29� 198I� AND A"REPORT ON STATUTORY CONDITIONS OF A REDEVELOPhfENT DIST.RIC2 (273.73. SUB. ZO), TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN N1 TO THE MOORE LAKE REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT", AfSO ICNO[4N AS EXHSBIT A� CONTASNING MR. DARREL CLARK RND hII2. MI1RK BURCH'S REPORTS. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHRIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY. � Mr. Burch stated that Mr. Boardman had asked the Engineering Department to 7ook at the different areas to verify the soil probleins. He stated they had soil borings taken by two companies, and these reports are included behind his letter. These are the soil borings they based their estimates on for the soil corrective work. He stated they broke the areas down to the areas in which the soil borings were taken and estimated the size of the areas that needed to be corrected based on the limited borings. They then used current prices to estimate the cost of the projects, assuming the work would be done during the 1982 construction season. The soil correction would be the hau7ing out of peat and replacing it with fill suitable for building. There are other methods which are more expensive, but they fe7t this was the cheapest way they could correct the soi] in this area and still make it buildable. Mr. Larson stated Mr. Boardman had contacted him and asked him to appraise Area �1 (Phase III), Area �2 (Phase V), and Area #3 {Phase II). On April 14, he and M��. Boardman went out and personally toured all the areas in question. Ne was provided with maps by the City of Friclley, and they de]ineated the lines of these areas and also gave him the calculations on the square footage. Mr. Larson stated they then defined the problems. In Area #1, they wanted to look at its present zoning of C-2-S and PD and then as rezoned to R-3 General Multiple Family Qvrellings. Tn Area �2, they looked at its present zoning of C-1-S and R-1, and then as rezoned to R-2. In Area tt3, they looked at its present roning of R-1 and R-3 and then as rezoned to R-3. The appraisal was done on a raw land basis as is and computed as discussed before with those figures he used to 'come up with a market value after the sites were prepared. Mr. Larson stated the HRA had a copy of his cover letter and Mr. Boardman has copies of the complete report prepared for the City. In the report, he inc7uded a"Market Data Analysis", a description of"Market Value", and the definition of "Principle of Highest and Best Use". The ownership is as of record. 1"he legal description he received from the City of Fridley. Mr. Larson stated the lot description for Area 1 is that it has hiqh ground along Central Ave. for about 150 feet, then drops off to an old ntininq area which was probably mined for sand and gravel, going to the �,�est and then drops off to a low, marshy area with softwood trees and drainage ditch, and a fair]y low area from the northeast corner all the way to the lake. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PUBLIC HEARING MEETING, MAY 4, 1981 PAGE 8 Mr. Larson stated that in Area #2, the three residential lots facing Rice Creek Road have some high ground for about 5 or 10 feet, then drop off in about a 20� sTope to a low, marshy area. Also through that area is a drainage ditch. That is an official drainage ditch for this particular area, runs through these lots, and then along the north edge of the co-op grocery store, with the lots 17 and 18 facing Central being filled over the years with various types of material. Mr. Larson stated Area the southwest area and south on Hiilwind Road struction techniques. #3 is an open water and swamp area with water flow from then is level to the east with a very severe slope to the This siope faces northeast and presents special con- Mr. Larson stated there are utilities available to all these properties. In all of these particular areas, in his opinion, no development has occurred in the last five years, probably because of the cost to develop it. Neighborhoods have developed around each of the sites, but have developed no further at the present time. Mr. Larson stated the cost approach to value is not appropriate for this report, nor is the income approach to value, so it is strictly a market data comparison approach. He stated the City is pretty well developed except for these spot areas and some minor lots around the City that probably have problems. He stated he went into the market and looked at the areas that are C-2 and L-1 for the com- parables in Area kl to find out what the market says is the vatue of the land. 7hen, he came up with a per square footage and per acre value. He then adjusted that for the market value after soil corrections. He also looked at the R-3 General Multiple Family Dwellings in Area #1, and in this particu7ar area, he had to go outside the City to do it. Under the R-3 zoning, there is a large market demand for "quadra-miniums". Mr. Larson stated that in Area #2, C-1-S Local Shopping Areas, Lots 17 and 18 on Central Ave., and Rice Creek Road, the new shopping center on East River Road and 79th gave a good indication of the market. Mr. Larson stated in Area #2, the R-) Sing7e Family D�,re]ling Areas is comparable to two areas on Central Ave., 67th & Central and 6229 Central, and one at 44th & 4th in Columbia Heights. Mr, Larson stated in Area #2, the R-2 Two Family Dwelling Areas, they have had that type of development the past fea� years at 73rd Ave. N.E., Evert's Court, and Norton St. N,E. Mr, Larson stated in Area #3, R-3 General Multiple Family Dwellings, he again used the comparables outside the City. In R-1 single family dwellings, the market reflects a value for unplatted and developed sites for single family residences to be very minimal at this time. Using the R-3 comparables, a factor of 50% reduc- tion in the value of the raw land is used to indicate the value of single famiiy residential land. NOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTNORITY PUBLIC HEARING MEETING, MAY 4, ]981 PAGE 9 Mr. Larson stated that after doing the market value analysis, he prepared a correlation which shows where he took the estimated market values per acre for each zoning and adjusted that for a final estimate of value. He stated he included a"Certificate of Appraisal", photooraphs of each area being considered, maps of al] the comparable sales that were included in the report, legal des- criptions, site locations on half-section maps, zoning map, zoning ordinances, flood plain map, and estimated market values, taxes, special assessments and delinquents. . Mr. Comners thanked tdr. Clark, P�r. Burch, and Mr. Larson for their reports. Mr. Herrick stated the HRA is going to be asked to adopt Resolution f�o. HRA-7-1981, and the findings to meet the statutory requirements are set forth in the resolution. If anyone has any questions relative to these findings, those questions shou7d be asked, and he thought the discussion should be directed to whether or not there is sufficient evidence ip the Exhibit A, reports, or testimonies for the HRA to make those findings. Mr. Boardman stated those finuings are the fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth "WHEREAS" clauses in the resolution, He is looking for approval of the resolution from the NRA for submittal to the City Council. Mr. Commers asked if anyone in the audience wished to address the HRA regarding Tax Increment Plan #1 to the Moore Lake Redevelopment Area. Ms. Carol Fassett, 1001 Lynde Drive, stated she has a lot of concerns, but she is going to limit her concerns at this time to Area #3• 7his land is the s�aamp- land, known as Erickson's Land", which is across the street from her home. She felt there was something that was not being addressed, and it is in one of the four °l4HEREAS`s" in the resolution the HRA is supposed to vote on and pass on to the City Council. She quoted the sixth "WHEREAS": "WNEREAS, development or redevelop- ment in the district, in the opinion of the Housing & Redevelopment Authority, would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonable foreseeable future." From what they have discovered, she stated this is not exact7y true. They have been involved with this before, and have been in contact with Mr. Ericksbn who owns the majority of the land because of a recent rezoning request by Mr, Erickson to put in 180 apartment units. After the City Council meeting on April 13, h1r. Erickson indicated to the neighbors that he is ready to develop the land. The neighborhood would not agree to 180 apartment units, but Mr. Eri�kson did agree to work with them on a lesser density and will contact them with a proposal. Mr, Erickson indicated he was not aware of the tax increment district or plan and did not develop his proposal because of it. In other words, she stated Plr. Erickson is planning on developing in the foreseeable future without tax increment monies; therefore, she did not feel this area could be included in a tax increinent district because it does not meet one of the criteria which is that there is no developer interested. Ms. Fassett stated she was also not sure about the other Area #1 that is a new inclusion, and she did know the owner of the land was asking for some rezoning. She suspected he may be interested in doing something with his land now without tax increment financing. NOUSING & REDEVELOPMEN7 AUTHORITY PUBLIC HEARING MEETING, MAY 4, 1981 PAGE 10 Mr. Ted Burandt, 6211 Riverview Terrace (1001 Hillwind Rd.) stated he owns that property and would be in favor of tax increment financing, It was his initial intention to rezone the property using the existing structure as a remodei. He was not aware of the tax increment district until he talked to Mr. Boardman about 2-3 weeks ago, and Mr. Boardman had told him his property was included in the area. The reason he wants to rework the existing structure is 6ecause he cannot get financing to put up the proper building that really should be there. He stated the City wants him to tear down the existing structure and that may be one of the stipulations an the rezoning. Ms. Fassett sta�ed that as another use for the larger area of R-2, they submitted a petition to the City Council last week to possibly acquire that land for park land. As she understood it, the swamp is part of the Moore Lake clean-up project and has to be enlarged, dredged, etc. They would like to have the opportunity to submit the petition to the Parks & Recreation Commission also. They have made some contacts to an Anoka County commissioner who is invo7ved in a funding proposa7 that funds for acquisition of parks and open space. They feel if this area is designated as a tax increment district, that kind of blocks what the neighborhood really wants done with that land and that is to basicaliy Teave the land as it is. She would like the HRA to take that into consideration when they vote on the resolution. Mr. Boardman stated the HRA would have the option for amendment if they wished to remove this property from the district. As far as the HRA, the purchase of the property itself for park purposes would be very difficult to pay for as far as the generation of tax increment. Mr. Commers asked what would happen if they excluded this phase at this time. Mr, Boardman stated that if they excluded this portion at this time, at a later date if they wished to add it back in, if new legislation was passed, they wou7d have to go through tests on the new legislation. It would be better to add it now with the option to take it out. 1�1r, Commers asked what ihe proposal was for Mr. Burandt's property in Area #1. Mr. Boardman stated he would propose that the property be included in Area #1 so that the existing structure can be removed and a new structure can be built. Mr. Conmers asked what P1r. Soardman's response was to Ms. Fassett's inquiry about the sixth "WHEREAS" in the resolution. Mr. 6oardman stated his only response is that he was not aware that '�r. Erickson had any financing lined up. Ne had a proposal into the City Council, but that proposal was based on an approval of rezoning. After that, he stili would have had to line up financing, and that would liave been very difficuTt fcr an apart- ment complex. HOUSING & REDEVELOPI�ENT AUTHORITY PUQLIC HEARING MEETING, MAY 4, 1981 PAGE 11 Mr. Commers stated that, regarding the resolution, his concern related to the question of whether or not there would be private development or private remodeling without some kind of assistance, at least with respect to Phase I and Phase II. Mr. Prieditis stated that regarding the sixth "tJNEREAS", if the HRA approves the resolution and then within a short period of time a developer comes in and says he is planning to develop without any assistance, would that ruin the entire approach? Mr. 6oardman stated they had testimony from people and developers at the redevelop- ment district public hearing that if the property has conditions that have been laid out, in their opinion it would not be developed. The HRA, at this point in time, can only react based on that testimony. Mr, Prieditis stated that as long as there is that flexibility with the phasing and development, he could go along with the resolution. Mr. Houck and t4r. Prairie agreed with that. . Mr. Commers stated he was concerned about the notification to the public. He felt there should be some mechanism set up for notification in any one of these phases when there is a plan that is going to be considered by the HRA, other than just the notification in the Sun Newspaper. Mr. Boardman stated they would notify in whatever way the HRA wanted. Mr. Houck stated he thought it would be excellent to notify peop7e within 300 ft. of the affected property areas. Mr. Commers requested Staff to develop some kind of notification proposal to be presented to the HRA for their consideration at their next meeting. MOTION BY MR. PRRIRIE� SECONDED BY MR. NOUCK� TO ADOPT RESOLUTION N0. HRA-7-198Z, "RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TAX INCREPSENT PLAN �.Z TO THE MOORE LAKE REDEVELOPMENT AREA AND FILING A PROJECT APPLICATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY". UPON A VOZCE VOTE� RLL VOTING RYE� CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOSIDN CARRIED UNANIh10USLY. � MOTZON BY MS. SVENASEIJ, SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRIS� TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON TAX INCREtfENT FINANCE PLAN Iil TO THE MOORE LRKE REDEVELOPMENT DISTRiCT. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CL05ED AT 7:58 P.M. NOUSING & REDEVELOPtdENT AUTHORITY PUQLIC HEARING MEETING, MAY 4, 1981 PAGE 12 ADJOURNt4ENT: Chairperson Commers declared the May 4, 798], Housing & Redevelopment Authority Public Hearing meeting adjourned at 8:00 p,m. Respectfully subiitted, `� � �� ynne Saba Recording Secretary r� CITY Of FRIDLEY PLANNING COh%1ISSION MEETING, JUNE 3, 1981 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Harris called the June 3, 1981, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Mr. Harris, Ms, van Dan, Ms. Gabel, Mr. Svanda, Mr. Oquist, Ms. Hughes (for Mr. Kondrick), Mr. Wharton Members Absent: None Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner Charles Johanson, 424 Rice Creek Blvd. Mr. & Mrs. Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Dr. APPROVAL OF MAY 6, 1981, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: �OTION BY MR, OQUIST� SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA� TO APPROVE THE. MAY 6� I982� PLRNNING COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRSTTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRMAN HRRRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: RE4UEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #81-08, BY PETER A. EISENZIMNIER: Per Section 205.05�, 2,—�he FridSey City Code, to a ow t e construction of a second accessory building, a 26 ft. 6y 28 ft. detached garage on Part of Lot 8C, Second Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 21, the same being 6535 Oakley Drive N.E. MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY AES. VAN DAN, TO OPEN TXE PUBLIC XEARING ON SP N82-OS BY PfiTER A. EI5ENZIMMER. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE PUSLIC HERRING OPEN AT 7:36 P.M. Mr. Boardman stated the proposal is for a new second detached garage, 26 ft. by 28. ft. He stated Mr, Eisenzimner was in the audience if the Commission had any questions. Ms. Gabel asked Mr. Eisenzimner if he planned to keep the current garage as a garage or did he plan to convert it into living space? Mr. Eisenzimmer stated he planned to keep it as a garage. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 3, 1981 PAGE 2 Mr. Harris asked Mr. Eisenzimmer if he planned to have a surface driveway. Mr. Eisenzimmer stated, yes, he planned on putting in a concrete driveway. Mr. Harris asked Mr. Boardman to define the rules of a home occupation to Mr. & Mrs. Eisenzimner. Mr. Boardman stated that accessory buildings, such as garages, are not allowable for use as a home occupation, so operating an auto body or any other business is not allowed out of a garage. He stated this is just a reminder to Mr. Eisenzimmer that a home occupation would not be allowed and that the garage can only be used as a storage garage. Mr. Eisenzimmer stated he understood that. Mr. Boardman stated that if at any time Mr. Eisenzimmer would want to convert the existing attached garage to living area, he would need a variance because the setback on the side yard is 5 ft, and l� ft, is rQquired from living space to the lot line. MOTION PY .�Il2. WHARTON� 5ECONDED BY .�Il2. SVRNDA� TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SP #8I-08 BY PETfiR R. EISENZIMMER. � OPON A VOICfi VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHRIRMAN HARRTS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSHD AT 7:45 P.M. J�fOTION BY MS. HUGHES� SECONDED BY PII2. SVANDA� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE' REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, 5P �81-08� BY PETER A. EISENZIMMER: PER SECTION 205.052� 2, A, OF.THE FRIDL&'Y CITY CODE, TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SECOND ACCESSORY BUILDING, R 26 FT. BY 28 FT. DETACE[ED GARAGE ON PART OF LOT BC�. SECOND REVISED RUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 21, THE SAME BEING 6535 OAKLSY DRIVE N.E.� WITH THE FOLIAWING STIPULATIONS: 2. THSRfi BE THE 5UITABLE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. 2. THE PROHIBITION OF THE GARAGE BEING USED FOR A HOME OCCUPATIQN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY. Mr. Harris stated SP #81-08 would go to City Council on June 75. 2. LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #81-05, BY CHARLES E. JOHANSON: Split Lot 1a in two to make two buil ing sites, Lot 9 an North 1/2 of Lot 10, Block 6, Fridley Park, the same being 6570 Hickory Street N.E., and Lot 71, and South Half of Lot 10, Block 6, Fridley Park, the same being 6550 Hickory Street N.E. Mr. Harris stated this was not a formal public hearing but would be conducted as an informal public hearing. PLANMING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 3, 1981 PAGE 3 Mr. Soardman stated this property was located west of the railroad tracks, north of Mississippi St. on Hickory Street. He stated Mr. Johanson has 135.2 ft. �f street frontage off Hickory St. Mr. Johanson has removed the existing structure and is proposing a lot split to make two 67.6 ft. lots. This is allowable under the old platting. He stated the lot square footage is over the 7,500 sq. ft. requirement. He stated Mr. Johanson plans to build a nice looking house on one of the lots. At this time, Staff has no questions and feels this is an agreeable lot split. Ms. Hughes asked if tfiere was any likelihood of drainage problems. Mr. Johanson stated there was not. MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, 5&CONDED BY MS. VAN DAN, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST, LS #8I-O5, TO SPLIT IAT 10 IN TWO TO h1A7CE TWO BUSLDING SITES� LOT 9 AND NORTH 2/2 OF IAT 2p� ,BLOCX b� FRIDLEY PARK� THE SAME BBING 6570 HICKORY STREET N.E., AND LOT Ii� AND SOUTH HALF OF LOT I0� BLOCK 6� FRIDLEY PARK, THE SAME BEING 6550 HICKORY STREET N.E.� WITH NO STIPULATIONS. UPON A VOICE VOTE� RLL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Harris stated LS #81-05 would go to City Council on June 15. 3. RECEIVE MAY 7, 1981, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: MOSION BY MS. VAN DAN, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TD RECEIVE THE MAY 7� 2981� XUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES. Ms. van Dan stated that the City has hired an intern, Claire Hughes, for the summer to help with the International Year of Disabled Persons (IYDP) project committee. Ms. Hughes will be working with the handicapped throughout the surmner. UPON A VOICfi VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHRIRMRN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. RECEIVE MAY 12, 1981, COMMUNITY DEVELOPME�lT COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. OQUIST� SECONDED BY MS. HUGHES� TO RECEIVE THE MAY 12� 2981� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTfiS. - Mr. Oquist stated that the Commission has not yet received any direction from the City Council on Industrial Revenue bonds. He stated a motion was made for the Commission to meet with the City Council at a conference meeting to discuss the goals and objectives of the Comnission. He stated they had continued their dis- cussion on the purpose of the commission until the next meeting as they were missing two members. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN XARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 3, 1981 PAGE 4 5. RECEIVE MAY 12, 1981, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY AIl2, OQUIST� TO RECEIVE THE MAY 12� 1981� APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES. . UPON A VOICE VOSE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. RECEIVE MAY 13. 1981, PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. HUGHES, SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST� TO RECEIVE THE MAY 13� 2981� PARKS 6 RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES. Ms. Hughes stated the Comnission had held their elections, and Dave Kondrick was the new chairperson. She was the vice-chairperson. She stated the Parks & Recreation Commission minutes did not reflect that one of the reasons she had denied the nomination for chairperson was because of the fact that she found it very hard to work with Dr. Boudreau. Ms. Hughes stated that regarding the petition for the City to purchase the property in the area north of Hillwind Drive, east of Polk and west of Fi71more, for park use, the Commissian simply received the petition. This property is in the Maore Lake Redevelopment Area.. She stated the Commission will continue to keep track of that general discussion. The Commission is not particularly in favor of that land for any kind of park use. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED 7. RECEIVE MAY 4, 1981, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY MS. VAN DAN, TO RECEIVE THE MAY 9� .298I� HOU52NG & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHASRMAN HARRIS DECLFiRED THE MOTION CARRI&D UNANIMOUSLY. 8. OTHER BUSINESS: a. Amendment to Chapter 205 of the Fridley City Code, Generally Known as +� �;�9—��„ ,.. Mr. Boardman stated the City Council will be opening a public hearing on Chapter 205 on June 8. The primary reason for opening the public hearing is they are goinq to take an action to eliminate special use permits for duplexes in R-1 zoning, set up a separate ordinance, and delete it from the existipg Zoning Code. The City Council will probably PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 3, 1981 PRGE 5 discuss the rest of the Zoning Code in conference meetings. The City Council will also be considering the Community Development Commission's recommendation on existing units of having two families in an existing single family unit. b. Cancellation of June 77 Meeting Date Mr. Boardman stated there were no items for the next Planning Comnission meeting on June 17. If the Commission members had no objections, he would recommend this meeting be cancelled. MOTION BY MR. WHARTON� SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST� TO CANCEL THE JUNE I7� 1981� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. UPON A VDICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS�DECLARSD THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. WHARTON, SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST, TO AA70URN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICB VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHRIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE JUNE 3� 1981� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:35 P.M. Respectfully su mitted, Lyn� Recording Secretary