The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 04/07/1982 - 6773PLANNING CaMMISSION MEETING CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: City of Fridley A 6 E N D A WEDNESDAY, APRIL 7, 1982 APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MARGH 24. 1982 1. PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #82-02, ROBE SCHROER: Rezone Tract B, C and D, Registered Land Survey No. 19, from C-1S (local shopping areas) to C-25 (general shopping areas) to make zoning consistent with use, the same being 652Q, 6530 and 6526 East River Road N.E. 7:30 P.M. PAGES IQs 7 - 12 2. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERI�IIT, SP #82-02, 13 - 23 NOBLE NURSERY, IP�C.: To use a 50'by 75' areas of Menard's parking lot for the sale of nursety stock, and christmas trees, in season, per Section 205.101, 3, N, of the Fridley City Code, to be located on Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision No. 94, the same being 5351 Central Avenue N.E. � 4. PUBLIG HEARING; REZONI 5 � FRIDLEY: Kezone Blocks f, Z, 3, 4 and b, Kee's Hdaition to Fridley Park, and Parcels 5000 and 5050, from a mixture of R-1 (single family dwelling areas}, C-1 (local business areas), C-2 (general business areas), M-1 (light industrial areas),and P(public facilities areas) to 5-2 {Special Zoni�g District),generally located between University Avenue N.E. and 5th Street, and from Mississippi Street N.E., South �63rd Avenue N.E. (but excluding Block 1, Auditor's ubdivision No. 59 [Parcels 100 and 105] (Fridley Bank � property). 24 - 25 26 - 31 RECEIVE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MARCH 11, 1982 WNITE RECEIVE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COhU�1ISSI0N MINUTES: MARCH 16, 1982 BLUE 7. RECEIVE ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES: MARCH 23, 1982 ORCHID 8. RECEIVE HOUSIN6 & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MARCH 24 1482 WHITE 9. OTHER BUSINESS: ADJOURMENT: CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 24, 1982 CALL TO ORDER; Vice-Chairperson Oquist declared the March 24, 1982, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Mr. Oquist, Ms. Gabel, Mr. Kondrick, Ms. van Dan, Mr. Saba Members Absent: Mr. Harris, Mr. Svanda Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner Robert C. Lindbloom, 6633 Gherokee Lane Joseph Perrozzi, 5100 Vincent Ave. No. Jim Prokopowicz, 4332 Washington St. N.E. Chester Schack, 685 Glencoe St. N.E. Donald & Doris Schneppmueller, 8151 Riverview Terrace N.E. R, H. Klingbiel, 8199 Riverview Terrace N.E. APPROVAL OF MARCH 10, 1982, PLANNING COMMISSION MTNUTES: MOTZON BY MS, GRBEL� SECONDED BY MR. SABR� TO RPPROVE THE MARCH Z0, 1982� PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTE5 8S WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, RLL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUI5T DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � 1, PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE 1�eapproval-�` a Specia sTD�e—�it;�P�7� to allow the construction of a dwelling in Lots 28 and 29, Block R, Riverview Heights, Terrace N.E. BY JOSEPH PEROZZI: Vl� !GI GVIrIV11 vJ�i�//� �/� v� the flood plain (CPR-2 Zoning) on the same being 8181 Riverview MOTION BY MR. SRBA� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SP N82-01 BY JOSEPH PEROZZI. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECIJIRED THE PUELIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:38 P.M. Mr. Boardman stated Mr, Perozzi had applied for a special use permit in 1979, It was heard by both the Planning Commission and City Council, and the City Council approved that specia7 use permit in 1979. The dwelling was not constructed within one year, and since no extension was applied for, the special use permit had expired. At this point in time; Mr. Perozzi is submitting a new special use permit for the construction of a building. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 24, i982 PA6E 2 Mr, Boardman stated that in 1974, Mr. Perozzi went to the Appeals Commission, and the Appeats Commission granted a variance for lot size, but did not grant him a variance on the side yard setback, based on the building that was being proposed to be constructed on the site. Mr. Boardman stated that at the Appeais Commission meeting on March 16, 7982, the Appeals Commission again recommended approval on the lot size, but this time there is a different building design that does not require the side yard setback, Otherwise, all the things are essentially the same as described in T979, including the drainage and elevation requirements, and those things were agreeable in 1979. Mr. Boardman stated Staff has no problems with the approval of this special use permit. Ms. van Dan asked if the bui]ding was going to be built on the lot as it is now or if the lot was going to be elevated. Mr. Perozzi stated fil7 will be brought in to meet the elevation requirements, Mr, Kondrick asked if it was Mr. Perozzi's intent to build his house on the same level as the surrounding homes. Mr. Perbzzi stated, yes, that was his intent, Mr. Boardman stated that with any construction, they have to meet all the require- ments as far as sewer traps and those kinds of things. 7he City's main concern is the drainage and making sure the lot is graded so the water drains out to the street to the catch basin, Mr. R. H. Klingbeil, 8199 Riverview Terrace, stated he lives right next door, and Mr. Perozzi is running very close to the grade on his property. He did not believe there was a contractor in the City of Minneapolis that could hold a grade like that. He would like to know who is going to check this to make sure the water does not dratn into the other properties. He stated that Mr. Perozzi's buildinq is so high, it is going to block the sun, and it will be the highest house in a block that is mostly ramblers. Mr. Donald Schneppmueller, 8151 Riverview Terrace N.E., stated he lives on the south side of this lot. He stated Riverview Terrace goes up from the Creek. Once Mr, Perozzi raises his lot level with Mr. Schneppmueller's, his driveway wi11 be constantly flooded. He stated they have gotten a petition signed by people in the neighborhood. He submitted this petition to the Planning Comnission, along with pictures of his lot and Mr. Perozzi's lot. MOSION 8Y MR, SABA� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO RECEIVE THE PETITION AGAINST THE BUILDING OF A DWELL£NG ON LOTS 28 AND 29� BLOCK R, RIVERVZEW HEIGHTS. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 24, 7982 PAGE 3 Mr. Oquist read the petition into the record: "This is a petition against the building of a dwelling on Lots 28 and 29, Block R, Riverview Heights, in CPR Zoning, Ftood Plain, the same being 8181 Riverview Terrace N.E. The dwelling would be built on e 50 ft. lot between two existing homes which would be a first on Riverview Terrace. This type of building would create crowding and would open the door for other such buildings in our area. We are sure this type of building would not be allowed next to $100-200,000 homes." UPQN A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHRIRPERSON OQUZST DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY. The Planning Conxnission members reviewed the drainage plan which showed the water draining out to the street. Mr. Boardman stated that on agenda page 20 (City Council minutes, June 4, 1979), the City Council made a motion "to grant specia7 use permit SP #79-04, with the siipulation that the City be satisfied that the drainage plan, as described and discussed, would be maintained in construction". At that time, Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, had stated that, "as far as drainage, the standard rule in Minnesota is that an owner may develop his property in a reasonable fashion, as long as it doesn't unnecessarily burden the neighbor" and "he doesn't have nearly as much trouble with the concept of saying he can 6uild, but has to insure drainage, as with the problem of saying he cannot build on this lot because it has to be used for drarnage". Mr. Boardman stated that right now this lot is being used for drainage, and that is not what a lot should be used for. Any owner of a piece nf property has the right to develop that property as long as it doesn't unnecessarily burden the neighbor. He stated the City Engineers have reviewed the drainage plan, and they feel the plan is adequate for taking the water out of the property without causing undue hardship on the neighbors. Ms. Doris Schneppmueller questioned whether it meant anything that all the neighbors were against this building. She stated all the neighbors are very upset about it, and that is why they submitted the petition. Mr. Saba asked how much higher Mr. Perozzi's house would be than the rest of the neighborhood, Mr. Boardman stated Mr. Perozzi's house height would be about 24 feet. Most rarnblers are about 15 feet in height. Under R-1 zoning, the City allows a maximum height of 30 feet. Mr. Klingbeil stated that if this building is built, the City Inspector should be sure he checks those grades. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 24, 7982 PAGE 4 MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY MS. VAN DAN� TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SP �F82-01 BY JOSEPH PEROZZI. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE PUBLIC HSARINC CLOSED AT B:17 P.M. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK�SECONDED BY MS. VAN DAN� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FOIZ SPECIAL USE PERMIT� SP }j82-OI� BY�JOSEPH PEROZZS� FOR TNE REAPPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE PERMZT� SP #�79-04, PEft SECTION 205.257� 5� D� TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DWELLING IN THE F7A0D PLAIN (CPR-2 ZONINGJ ON IOTS 28 AND 29� BIACK R� RIVERVIEW HEZGHTS� THE SAME BEING 8181 RIVERVIEW TERRACE N.E.� WITH THE STIPDLATZON THAT THE CITY BE SATISFIED THAT TXE DRAINAGE PLAN� AS DESCXSEED RND DISCUSSED� WOULD BE MAINTRINED IN CONSTRUCTZON, Mr. Saba stated he was also concerned about the drainage, but the plan looked like it would work. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING RYE, VZCE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED TXE MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Oquist stated SP #82-01 would go to City Council for action on April 5. 2. RECEIVE MARCH 3, i982, ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. SABA� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK� TO RECEIVE THE MRRCX 3� 2982� ENERGY COMMISSIDN MINUTES. - Mr. Saba stated there has been a major revision made to the Housing Maintenance Code for rentai property. At the last Energy Commission meeting on March 23, the Commission commended Staff for putting things together. Basically the energy regulations are adopted out of the State Energy Agency's Code, requiring a 5-year payback, improvements to be made immediately, with a l�-year payback to be made by July 1, 1983. If enforced properly, this revision should dramatically contribute to the energy efficiency of rental property in the City. It is a major step, and they hope it does what it is supposed to do. He stated there is a pretty heavy penalty for non-compliance, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� VZCE-CHAIIZPERSON OQUIST D&CLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Saba stated the Commission had also made a motion to support the Environmental Quality Commission's efforts in recycling and recommended that the energy conserva- tion aspect of recycling be emphasized as well as the cleaning up of the environment. If the Environmental Quality Commission would 7ike to meet jointly with the Energy Commission, they would be happy to meet with them. 3. RECEIVE MARCH 4, 1982, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. VAN DAN� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRZCK� TO RECEIVE THE MARCH 4� I9B2� HUMRN RESOURC85 COMMISSZON MINUTES. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCN 24, ]982 PAGE 5 Ms, van Dan stated the Accessibility Survey Project Committee has already had two meetings, and the proposed survey of the community's buildings (about 170) is already underway. They are very fortunate in that Julie Quarve-Peterson, who works with the National Nousing Institute, recently moved to Fridley, and she is helping the Commission develop a very basic accessibility survey form. Ms. van Dan stated that on Tuesday, March 23, there was a presentation by the Minneapolis Institute of Arts at the Fridley Library. It was very well attended. Ms, van 6an stated the No-Fault Grievance Procedure training session will be on Saturday, April 24. Coon Rapids, and possibly some other communities,will be joining the Human Resources Comnission. The session will involve teaching them what the No-Fault Grievance Procedure actually entails, and then the Commission will go from there as to whether they want to pursue it. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTSON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Boardman stated he has heard nothing but excellent reports about the Accessi- bility Survey Project Committee. The people who are involved in the committee are excellent people. They have detailed plans and a timetable set, and it is exciting to see something 7ike this happening. 4. RECEIVE MARCH 9, 1982, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINU7E5: MOTION BY MS. GAEEL� SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO RECEIVE THE MARCH 9� 1982� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMSNT COMMISSZON MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG RYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUTST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. RECEIVE MARCH 16, 1982, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. XONDRICK, TO RECEIVE THE MAkCH 16� Z982, RPPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUISS DECLARED THE MOTZON CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � 6. DISCUSSION O�i CENTER C1TY REZONING: Mr. Boardman stated a public hearing has been set for the April 7 Planning Commission meeting for Center City rezoning. Mr. Boardman stated they are looking at developing a clinic and office building with a plaza court outside City Hall and the relocation of 64th Ave. He stated one of the problems they have in Center City is a mishmash of zoning. So, they are looking at trying to handle the Center City zoning with a specia7 district. A special district is similar to a PUD (Planned Unit Development)-type of zone PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 24, 1982 PAGE 6 where it is zoned by p]an. The Planning Commission and the City Council would review the plan and approve the plan. Then, when something is built, it is built by plan, and they avoid variances that have to go through the appeals process. Mr. Boardman stated they wi71 be looking at doing things in the Center City area that they would not necessarily do on a normal-sized lot. They are trying to build the density, 6uild the quality, build a character within the district, and they feel it is much better and much easier to do by plan than it is by zone. Mr. Boerdman stated that at this point in time, as far as the property that will be rezoned to an S-2 District, they are looking at a77 the property from 63rd Ave. up to Mississippi, and would not get involved in any of the other properties at this time. Mr. Boardman stated notices have been sent to all the peop]e within 350 ft, of this area, and they have discussed it with the property owners in the area. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. SABR, TO AA70URN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CXAIRPERSON OQUZST DECLARED THE MARCH 24� 1982� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AATOURNED RT 9:30 P.M. Respectfully subm"tied, Lyn Saba Recording Secretary PUBLIC HEARIN6 BEFORE THE PLANNINf, COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there wi11 be a Publi� Hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, April 7, 1982 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 P.M, for the purpose of: Consideration of a Rezoning Request, ZOA #82-02 by Robert 5chroer, to rezone from C-1S (local shopping areas) to C-2S (general shopping areasJ Tracts B, C and D, Registere� La�d Survey # 19, to make zoning consistent with use, located in the North Half of Section 15, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. Generally located at 6520, 6530 and 6536 East River Road N.E. Any and ell persons desiring to be heard shall be given an-opportunity at the above stated time and piace. VIRGINIA SCHNABEL CNAIRWDMAN PLANNIN6 COMMISSION Publish: March 24, 1982 March 31, 1982 �� c�rv oF Fair�Le�r, SU9JEC7 ZO^NING ACTION ZQA #�y�1 �u� 643'1UIVWERSITVAVE.NE. VfiCATION SAV i�l/- -- � � FRI�LCY. MH. 6543£ (6121 579-34�Q PLAT PS R `� y b S �� ORDIPiANCE NO _ PUSLISHED nnnuF�e G� 3 D //,��f /I�,�-�-✓ / �.�-.� __ DATE PLANNING COl�iMIS5I0N: APPR04ED_ DISAPPROVED_ DATE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLIC NEARING DATE _ 1ST READ 2ND READ CITY COUtJCIL: APPROVED DISAPPROVED____ DATE PARK FEE REQUIRED: _ STIPULATIONS: � AMOU(�!T NAME � " " � %�. S'�fr�u,:� FEE'd � yv'L/�r- _ PAID f�[�7 NO RECEIPT N0,�1%�I STREET LOCATION OF PRpPERTY 6S 3 0 �=a> %;I't✓i-= h�n . LE6AL DESCRIPTIOC� OF PROPERTY TsE'gef .f.�(�' �s+NO .T��e.��! �✓ � � `'r'`-`�r PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION C 1S EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY ACREAGE OF PP.OPERTY DESCRIGF BRIEFLY THE PR�P�SED ZON?NG CLASSIFICATIOfd OR TYPE OF USE AND IMPROVEME+I�i PROPOSED cis �t �-� Has the present applicant previously sought to rezone, plat, obtain a lot split or variance or special use permit on the subject site or part of it? _,yes �_no. What ��ias requested and when? The undersigned understands t}�at: (a) A list of all resi�ents and owners of proper- ty within 350 feet must be attached to this application. {bj This application must be si9ned by all owners of the property, or an expl�nati6n given v:hY this ;s net the case. {c) Responsibility for any defer.t in the proceed�ings resulting fi�om the failure to list the names and addresses of al1 residents and property o�•rners of pro- perty in question, belongs to the undersigned. A sketch of proposed property and structure must be dravrn and attached, showing the follo�aing: 1. North direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on the lot. 3. Dimensions of �roperty, proposed structure, and front and side setbacks> 4. Street r.an�es. 5. Location and use of adjacent. existing buildin9s (��ithin 350 feet). The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. n 6ATE � - 8- ��- SI6NATURE t��Z� -�` � ��( PPLICANT � ADDRESS ��;t0 �/Al;drd'S //y +AY� ____` ____ TELEPNOtdE NO S�/-�G�o � MAILING LIS7 ZOA #82-02, Robert Schroer Robert H. Schroer 7620 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Donald Wescom 117 Mississippi Place N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Allan C. Mattson 627� Riverview Terrace N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 William Corcoran 111 64 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Chris Jelevarov 160 Mississippi Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Donald Johnson 6600 Hickory Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Richard A. Larson 6580 Hickory Street N.E. Fridley, tdn 55432 Charles E. Johanson 424 N.E. Rice Creek Bls1d. Fridley, Mn 55432 Gary Irene 71 66th Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Alfred Klous 6544 Hickory Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Charles tanger 6530 Hickory Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Donald Patterson 6502 Hickory Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Edward Brooks 6505 Hickory Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Planning Commissi City Council Mr. & Mrs. Dennis Dittmer 95 Mississippi Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Carl Christensen 6503 East River Road N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Louis Nash 6509 East River Road N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Otto Westenfield 81 Rice Creek Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. David Sina 6601 East River Road N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Jeffrey Rhall 6631 East River Road N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Edward Fragale 6480 Riverview Terrace N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Denise Smith 6492 Riverview Terrace N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Tycon Carp. 321 University Avenue S.E. Minneapolis, Mn 55414 Robert Schleeter Riverside Car Wash 6520 East River Road N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Suzanne Koprowski 6472 Riverview Terrace N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Murphy Oil Company 6485 East River Road N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 June M Sakry 121 64 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 March 23. 1982 E Mr. & Mrs. Walter Luckow 161 64 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Bernadine M, & Linda Matusak 141 64 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 �� n N L��af� �r . W _ V � P � � z � , ,,,,,E .✓ �, �-- , � r L `� �CA� �n � � �ni11�: � ,�� . �� woc� an KrNZ��N C0. W[YO�)f : . .. io ZOA #82-02, Robert Schroer �� .� ..,. JfJ�J 'I JII ° i�r_�r i S � � b �� 1 �y �� ^l_15�� i3li�JG' '" .'7rI/�nr�?�'�w�� ....m.�. cauru � c irtiurs STREET MAP-CITY OF FRIDLEY 0 $333 6,666 �y ; . , �17 �1 ' 'i �'Y�' �r�i�[ ,r * P (� . �� S� � 7� "e ; � i . x -:_�4+.a M....� a� < .�i .. "+ � �= 37��°� �, ,� ._; �ai .f .4 aAY (�% S /C`p,b.Ti J � � ! M � = ` . EY � ' N p n . " /; a � �'1 ►..b rrlt ? l � � . yY rp N a e �� ' � �� . �+, �p �O x� a � - �„ , 4 . : . , t OL l,sj'�.L4w. I V G� �f/Fi.alW �� <� 11 "' i � ��1_ � �`"�S� ` � ', €3S ��'` fb` , �y � . � SP #�2-02 : �� z2 `r 'a" � � , � � Robert �5chroer � 9�� s = k =�`'----� , , '' ��nA ;:+'. s �`a . � ':qj ��'� 3q ...: , � � � � ,:�, o , s�rH � •�� „ �� .�.e. �e � $ ,� +� — w 3 —''v- -� — — -- _ " 3 c , _ .. � _ �—`- .FI , M s�"p "� i � oa 5 / .+ `.Y.. ' � � ^ � f � �_ i.asi� s�. . . y � %y� �� ) �s � �` "ti _.M + � .y+'p *r �r � Y� 1 Is. �`� .e��3 � � I ✓�� - �nnJq/, +o � �FeY n � r '' n i 'It . s'"'`° ;� � 33 ?: �p" ` i °�`� 6 b� �j � ° � !�S � `> ;', �,° 4 6's % � �� / Yz '� � .� V� DI �. �� ,.y`��',. W, ��Y K� 98 b b "I y _..; � p/� • p 56 / � , ,1; ' .' . '_ "' ✓f� '1' p0 • .YV Y� �� ._ yr 7� 3 � 3 ��{ y�� 4b . / (/'f� ,_ 1 !�'b f� �- -;- [PFJl.__ ��hi... � i . 40 � 2 ♦ , � JO t M 6 tr' � � L n •.' ///'''�� " ft l� . r1 is � � \ �� [[[��1 � �•r PrX�� 1`�' \a �OD •..�H� 6 yl � �O �� / A b~ �� 0�0 y . b ' _ "� o �� a� ° . KK ,,, 33 b J M�/ • �7� !� � fi ! .A � `�' Q9 to �f F . 1 �n" � , s X � ' Y� `� 6 6 / 4� � � r, ,� ..I+jO ,.. V 1,, ..M�'� .E� �t \ �\^ Y - � f S � �` + � . ,�w��3 d �h 1Y '�S J �Is �ti 'r, y`Jfe� �` r�� 1 ` ,f�� ` 66'�`r �� ,��Fi : � 4 �k�.....w . ar i66a1 " �� A � ~ I 1 � � �4 f� ��i � t Q, � ( � FN' � �DO y � i ir �. ,,�, ,� �,,, s � � �� e � o ,:a,��, z$ n� Z � • �; !` ��, V , � n�`'' �;a; �� + , °y s•. 3� � � � - y� � i c ��' ;. . i` � O � ,r � 6� ,,jj�" 3,. "' � x ��• / T �'p✓`, r.'t'r ` .�s°t � . �'�f� . } r �� ,., c�� f �y �� j � \ +� , �� / pi!:,_. D .A • q� d '11 \ / i� . ��.: •. �C1 � � �; (11�: �._ �� ron 'v 4 � ,' nI� ' "' ,'` �-� �' � ' � ?� ;S : �65 //2 � '' �e � �T + j.� . .� � �c�� i �.�.�r % � �� .._:� �.::= �g � Q � �,�. .. �Yar. �. b�g0 0. •. . M � ' s " , ,� ,� � b�a.o- 5 I� � ; ,,�+e. � c� - .* �r;d y .''r � a` R•L' } ct,,�r • c� � � + _ tR�'i''. �.;;v:�•� � � � 6 i � t M A ` � s.:.ac;� 6 A � .. ��' � � . . �T"��••. � . ,� 1 p�,.,; ::;;,::� ��.'`' �'�' '° ' , - i ) � I R , g�f::�;::�'� � �:. . :. : w .� ~ �$:i+'• q..:�.....! J� /� ' S ` 3 ''!� ✓= V l;:i:.:•'�:•:•.• �t � J t' ,,. �• v '� .:7�. '�r: •' yy p O �s • v . ' 4�° � � .�_ * pC� b �� f Y � . � h � �i ei � :t� ..,. �.,. . `�:,,� -,,.n6soi 95 "{ — -- � I .� a� � L �ltij ,'J"'"U`. ' ', � � LlL_1__ . \�1SS�SSi� � � Y ,� : i�?. #�' � � I � � ._ :::�t:l-_ I�Y.fil�s/ Iri � J � _ _ � ' —�o ' _ A �i _ � `Z '�c� _ �+ ' ` � f R � i : ••'�. � ' „�..�' t �/,' � �--'` •;;�; '„•• „ "Sr � � --- �a � i� s f �= t • .a;�� ` tpAC . •;;':i " �� r : + .�- i . w v. � � . � .. - . ' � ' . - . , � . . . � � ' � . � � � . � � . � , �s'. . . ; j +. � " . ' � . r� . ' -..z� a ,,,saaaw �a �%° c'k =' * .#'�?,"lsti" '�� '+ri . :c.._ � ..a.e.�..a.w.r�Ja,:..' �'S�:T?�" ��:� ..3a'�a�s±L��'%�` , .....___w.�...�....s,. r�a .��.....�._.tim�.. �.. _, __ � � r � � - =�'��' � � � � � � � �2 r-' , \, � � � . . , r�' `R ¢� �. �andmar�c, ZPA $2-02 Robert o .T�dr�,ol � 'o, � Schroer � . •� ,3 ' °. �� 1 • � m I I _ 1 � o f � � � � 1, r � � � � � � � � �. . 00 � 1 . ` Cr . i� ', � ` °•'L � � p {� �CQ �e � � �ncn _ 1,^,�� ,,��- ➢ � 1`„ � D \\' f � � U �e�oTes !ron Mor,�.��rr..�:..-. 1 ' S C , �+ � Seoriny � shcrN: r . �.-. ,. v ` "' - 1y� � +� �� °a ` �� ° �'� , � �.'1 . �� `' �,X.:.`�:.:''�,�i . i�a...�-_r 4h' . . � Y . � — __.. ._... _ _ ._ . __. ...-.�. y o -� 2P� s � � � - G 1 51 po . -c O y ', o Zo . _ �F . ::�=��:��:�::; ��,a i � �� L�.G ' �, ;;"j 2:: � ;:�::::::µ:�:: ,G ':�;j:°;°�:��:�::�;:: :'� �U �N �� \ G-2- , (� �R14_ , .. P !` ~`�� j``�� „�6 . . � � GT f � � , J .�\ y'1M� ' ��A n �\ o R� � c� 5� °� � � 0 foa ; ;, C 1, c; �; h " � �� ., . ' �� <<)9 �`� _� �,\:� �;..� 3 - y.� . .� ` , `� � �� ^.'` ��.�., � C � � �� . ,-`;s<< _ 312�`� � � .� � _ .. .. i b � a:.. f� G� .i hN /' fW�110��`J�� . � ��[ : /' n.''./" ,"(,r, �, n . : �. 3 �t} . i . . -., �i � . r"� ! � � �� i , A., � . "V � - e . . �� '� • ' �� . �� •� �� {j{ I ,' � TruC{" l3 — G� S i Trd�+' C- c 1 S . 7'rac�"(J-Cis i � PUBLIC HEARING BEF�RE THE PLANNING COMMISSI6N Notice is hereby given that there wi11 be a Pub1i,� Hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of fridley in the City Ha11 at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, April 7, 1982 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 P.M. for the purpose of: Request for a Special Use Permit, SP #82-02, by Noble Nursery, Inc. to use a 50 ft. by 75 ft. area of Menard's parking lot for the sale of nursery stock, and christmas trees in season, per Section 205.101, 3, N, of the Fridley City Code, to be located on Lot 9> Auditor's Subdivision No. 94. Generally located at 5351 Central Avenue N.E. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. UIR6INIA SCHNABEL CHAIRWOMAN PLANIVING COMMISSI6N Publish: March 24, 1982 March 31, 1982 13 ��CITY ❑F �F1117LEY� - 0 643'I UNIVERSITY AVE. NE. FRIPLC-Y� MN. G543H (6123_571-34-°+O ADDRE55 � /' sua3ECr ia SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP # �a �% � DATE 4LANNING C0l�41ISSION: P,N. DATE APPROWED DISAPPROVED DATE NO CITY CQU�VCIL: P.H. REQ'0 4ATE NO CITY COUNCIL: APPROVED__ DISAPPROVED� DATE NO _ STIPULATIONS: NAt4�� -�""�-`�� ✓Vetfr '�� . STREET LQCATTON OF PROPERTY__ v � FEE T_C�O �°� RECEIPT NO_� > Q��3 -1 G�,�.r�� / .�1.Q /� C_._ � LEGAL DESCR.PTIOtr' OF PROPERTY �%i �"S� 9�� PRESENT ZOI�TNG CLASSIFICATION EXISTING USE OF PRaPEftTY �.va+r s 'c.- ACrccAGE �� fiOFERTY 7��,%� O DtSCRIBE BRIEFLY TNE YROi'OJEG iYFE Or' USE NNu IMPR01'ff4ENT variance or special use permit on the subject site or part or it: What was requested and wfien? .—_,ye5 �iv. The undersigned understands that: (a) A list of all residents and owners of oroperty within 3C0 feet must be attached to this application. (b) This application must be signed by all owners of the property, or an explanation qiven why this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any defect in the Qroceedings resulting from tfie failure to list the names and addresses of all residents and property awners of property in question, belongs to the undersigned. A sketch uf proposed property and structure must be drawn and attached, showiny the foitowing: 1. North direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on the lot. 3, [?imensions;of property, proposed structure, and front and side setbacks. 4. Street nan�es. 5. Location and use of adjacent existing buildinys (within 300 feet). The undersigned iiereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. ��Q'�.s �.f� � QATE a - `d — �Z - SI6NATURE__ �--- --- - ADDRESS zf3 � /zs� � L.+--� �t/uJ G TEIFPHONE NO 7�'S - 6� IMILING LIST SP # 82-03 Noble Nursery, Inc. Menard's Parking Lot Menards 5351 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55423 Kroger Company 5247 Highway #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn 55421 Ground Round 5255 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55421 A & L �4anagement Company c/o Alexander A. Levitan 2051 Long Lake Road New Brighton, Mn 55112 Yun H. & Soon 3ha Lee 1268 Skywood Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55421 Mr. & Mrs. Carl Heggestad 1258 Skywood Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55421 Mary L. Matthews 1259 5kywood Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55421 Sheldon Mortonson 2289 85th Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, Mn 55432 DAB Investments, Inc. 10301 University Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, Mn 55434 Mr. & Mrs. Jerold Lehman 5211 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55421 Mr. & Mrs. Joseph Voltinson 5215 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55421 Mr. & Mrs. Robert Wachsmuth 5241 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55421 — - -- -- -- ------� 15 Planning Commission March 23. 1982 City Council Noble Nursery, Inc. 8659 Central Avenue N. E. Minneapolis, Mn 55432 H.E. Sandbulte 287 120th Lane N.W. Coon Rapids, Mn 55434 WYMPN SMITH LfONARO T.JUSTER NENiiY H. FEII(EMA AL41N $. MALMON RDNALD L.MASHVITZ CARL J. NEWOWST MARK E. H!.GGERTY JOHN M.QIBLIN ♦850CIATE$ J.GHRISTOPHER CUNEO B. WILLIAM EKSiRUM STACEY A.00NAL6 JAMES W.HOESCHLER March 11, 1982 16 LAW OFFICES SMI1'H, aJUSTEB, FETSEMA, MALMON BC HASHVITZ CNARTERED SUITE 1250 BUIL�ERS E%CMANGE BUILOING M�NNEAPOLiS,MiNNE50TA 55<02 TELEPHONE L6i2� 339-14BI City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 SPECIAL USE PERMIT FRiDLEY OFFICE 59411JNIVERSITY 4VENUE.N.E. FRIDIEY�M�NNE50TA 55<32 TELEPMONE C612J 5]66B]O Enclosed please find an app7ication for a Special Use Permit, being filed on behalf of Noble Nursery, Inc. wf�ich leases a portion of the parking 1ot of the Fridley Menards store. I also am enclosing a copy of the Lease Agreement, a drawing showing the proposed area in Menards parking lot, and a check made payable to the City of Fridley in the amount of $200.00. Please fi1e the application and place it on the City agenda as soon as possible. When you have determined when the matter is to be heard, please notify Mark Haggerty of this 1aw firm at his office in the Builders Exhange Building in dowtown Minneapolis. Yours very truly �W.tk;C.t.r�s+, ��o�� B. William Ekstrum fridley Office tn Enclosures 4 cc Mark Haggerty ^ N Loca�'ion � .�. �o — ��.�, � �w.c.roua .�.� ..�� ..� .... SP #82-02 » Noble Nursery, Inc. �� . �� ...��. ME�G�*S STREET MAP-CITY OF FRIDLEY ' .- - LEASE ACREEMCNT „' �$ THIS AGREEMENT, en[ered into this�_�day o£��TL'/�h /j � Zg� yY and becveen !f£NAAD� INC:, a IJisconsin Corpora[Son, heceinaf[et refezred to as Lessoz, and /1/0/��/� /t/j,/�f/'/1a� //v L' , heteinafter referred to as Lessee. 1. PREMISES ' Lessor hezeby leasea to Leeaee and Lessee iieceby ren[s fzom Lessor e pareel of real e approximat/e.�/(y 50' X 350', hereinafter reEerred Go as [he "leased premises" lota[ed 1lyl��ZU ' �?� fj��/��% � M�✓ , ihe exaet location id 50 x 150 parcel shall be determined by Lessot a[ its sole discretion on �'C and may be changed [o anocher locaeion an the shopping �en[er a[ the sole discretion ssor rnyCime thls lease ia in effecL � 2. iERM The term of [his agreement shall be�ear(s) and 0 month(s) commencing on the tetday of December. 19 81and terminating on the 3�th day of November. 19�, - 3. � REN'f � � Lessee shall pay to Lessor monthly zental in the sum of E730,OOpayable on [he 'ira[ day of eaeh month Leasme� intends to use the leased remises. Lessee will deposlt ✓i[h Lessor Che sum of� 3G �=epresen[ing the ren[ for i C6ai/j/'i2 , ly Ci� � on �ovember 15� 1g87. _ 4. USE PERIODS Lessee agreea that SG shall pay rent for a[ leas[ [hzee (3) months during each of :he three (3) above deseribed lease years. Or+e of said three (�) mon[hs shall be the non[h of Decem6er. The zemaining [vo (2) months will be determined by Lessee vi[h +ritten no[ice to Lessot of at leas[ [hir[y (30) days prior co [he beglnning of said ion ehs. During the ierm of this lease Lessor may rent the premises for eddi[ional periods, :f Lessee glves Lessor [hir[y (30) days notice of the leng[h of the additional perSod and :he beginning date of said additional period. ihe ren[ for said additional period will be _hac as se[ forth herein, pald in advance and pro-ra[ed if necessazy. Lessor shall be en[itled ta use the leased premises during any period that has not +een provided for in chia Section Four (b). 5. VSE OF LFASED PREHISES Lessee covenants and agrees that St will use the leased premises only for e Nui�sr-�zy � S�lr c� C��,.T,:-�r �k�-;-t 6. UiILITIES - - Lessee sfiell be�responeible foc and pay all charges foz [he Snstalla[ion and use of :he hea[, gas, wa[er, ele�[r1ca1 and telephone vtilities. All u[ili[ies for Lessee's use :ha31 be ins[a1led Sn Such a manner as noC to interfere vi[h Lessor'9 use of area adjacen[ :o [he premises. Any postion of the elased premises or adjacen[ area which are disturbed �y the ins[allation of utilities shall be resCOred to their oziginal condi[ion. Upon [he expira[Son or termina[Son of [hIs agreement, Lessee shall be zespons161e for and pay all :harges assoota[ed mi[h [he removel of said utili[y equipment and connettions; and sha,L1 restore [he leased premises and adjacent area to original condi[Son. 7. STRUCTURE Lessee shall be peTmitted to erect at 1[s eost, a temporary fence and any o[her :emporary�struc[ureb necessaxy for Lessee's business on [he leased premises, whlch shall �o[ be tonsldered a patG of the xealty, provided, Nowever� Cha[ such improvemen[s shall be ;ubje[t to the design approval of Lessor whiCh will not be vnreasonably v1[hheld, the sAld `enctng and structures shnll not be permit[ed on the leased. premises during peciods that ;essee vould not be en[1iled to use the leased premises pursuanC [o Section 4 above, ihe �esponsibility and cost of removing said fences and s[ruc[ures shall be salely tha[ of the ;essee. Upon expization or termina[ion of this agreement, Lessee shall remove said fen�ing ind struccures and xestore-the Ieased premises to their oziginal condlclon. Lessee shall ceep the leased ptemises free�of inechanie's liens and any o[her encumbrances. - 1 - - ' 8.� HAINiENANCE . � � � 9 Lessee shall be tesponsible for all maSnCenance�of [he stru[[ures antl utilitles assoclated wl[h Che leased premises. Sn addltion,. Lessee shall be responsible for the maintenanee of the esphal[ surface and snov�iemovaI ai[hin [he demised premises. 2he Lessor shall malnYain the co�moon area avrro�ndinR the leased premises. Lessce shall contribute S?0.00 pez month for the mon[hs Lessee uses Che leased premises, payable on the Lst of ench montl�, ae�addi[ional ren[, twards the Lessor's costs to main[ain [he comman area. Lessee 8hali at all [imes keep the premises in a nea[ and orderly eondi[ion. , 9. ASSICNMENT AND SUBLETTINC ihis agreement is not assignable, nor shall any porcion of the premises be sublec vichouc the prior vrit[en consent of Lessor. 30. SICNS Lessee shall first obtain vri[[en approval from Lessor for any sign. 11.. 2AXES As 6eeveen Lessee and Lesaor, the atrv�tvre erected hy Lessee is considered personal pcoperty. Lesaee shall be tesponsible for payment of eny�and ell leasehold, personal pcoper[y, excise and sales [axes assodaied vith the leased premises. In the event [he local [axing au[hori[y includes LesSee'S S[roc[ure as real estatt foi purposes of aceessing proper[y taxes againat Lessor, Lessee shall be responsible for and pay any differente in Lessar's taxes �s[ccibutable to Lessee's sczucture. Lessee ahall pay all taxes when due and payable. 12. SNSURANCE Lessee shall pzocure and maintain in force and effec[ throughou[ [he [erm of . [his agreemen[, Comprehensive General LSability Insurance, insuring Lessor and Lessee from all clalms, demands or actions, vlth minimum limics of no[ less [han $30D,004.OQ for in]urine5 or death of one person in one a[ciden[ and noC les9 than $1,000,000.00 for Snjuries to or dea[h of more than one person in one otcurente, and no[ less than $SOO,OOD.00 propeTty damage, made by or on behalf of any person or persons or cotp— ora[ion arising from, rela[ed to or connected vith the conduc[ and operaCion of Lessee's business from [he leesed preml5es. Lessee shall furnish Lessor vith cer— tifitaCes ahwing tompliance vith th15 provislon upon demand. . 13. WAIVER Lessee valveg any or all right of recovery against [he Lessor, for damages occucing to Che pzopetty of ihe Lessec caused by theft,'fire or o[her casual[les for vhich the Lessee Ss uninsured� vhich damages are cavsed by negligence of the Lessor or of any third pazties. � 14. ZNDEMNIFICATLON . Lessee shall Sndemnify and hold Lessor haimless against any and all claSms, causes of action, liability, sui[s or judgments, including expenses incurted and also Sncluding a[torney�s fees, foz injuries to persons or proper[y arising ou[ of Lessee's ac[i�lties on [he leased premises. 15. NOTICES . � � Whenever�under this 1¢ase a provision is made for any demand, no[ice or declaration of any kind or where it Ss deemed desireable or necessazy by either paxty to give or serve any-such notice, demand or declaration to the o[her, it shall be in writing sent by certified mail with poseage prepaid, if to Lessee addressed to Lessee at�Gh'r/�(��=r'T2�t /�d_.,.[�f'i %`�.�-'�'�i'��'�'S fJ�(/ �5 V3y and Sf to Lessor, addressed Co Lessor at Nenard� Ine. Rou[e No. 2, Ea� Clalte, Wisconsin 54701, and either party may be like nocice at any [ime and from Cim¢ to time designate a diffe[ent address to vhich notites� sha11 6e senG. Such noCices, demands or declaza[ions shall be deemed s�fficienCly served oc given foc all pucQoses hereunder aC [he time [hey shall be mailed by Un2[ed 5[a[es cer[Sfied ma11 as aforesaid. 16. SAVINGS CLAUSE ihe invalldi[y or unenforceabilicy of any provision of this lease shall no[ affec[ or impair the validity of any other plovision. . _ y ' '' i . 20 17. HEADINGS � ' _ � . Tlie eec[ion t1[les hereln are ior convenience�only and do not define, limit or cans[rue Che contenta of sueh paragxaphs. �: 18. DEFAULT -� � � In the event tha[ Lessee eha11 defaul[ in the payment of rent or other charge hereunder; or shall fail [o eomply with any oChaf e[i[ion innbankruptcyChoL shall menc; oc shall file, oz have filed agatnat i[: p make an assignment for che benefi[ of credi[ors; ar shall abandon [he premises or cease Yo do business Cherein; or shall permit a lien to be filed against the leased ment,sin�additionsto anyeothercremediee1vhicheereCavallableC[o Lessorte [his agree- 19. CONDEMNATION AND LOSS DR DAMACE If Che leased ycemises ahall be taken or condemned £or any publi� pucpose to buch an ex[ent as to [ender the leased ptemises vntenan2able, Ghis agceemen[ sha11, taking oTicondemnaCionfofaChe�ptemisesishallsbelong[tomandCbe paid to Le6sorfrom any 20• OPTION TO AENEH� . If Lessee is not 1n default undeT any of [he tenns and conditions of this Lease, [he Lessor he:eby gran[s to Lessee Che right and aptlon tO earsW(nrenewalnd the [eYmS of this lease for one (1) additional period o£ [vo (2) y cerm") from [he date of the expiration hereof, upon the same terms and conditions as set forCh herein wi[h respec[ [o �the primary term, with [he exception af Tent, . as her¢inaf[er sivinorLessornsix (6)emonth6gvri[tenin titeXpriozetotthe expiradon shall do so by g B of che primary terni. ' � In the event Lessee elecis to exexcise said op[ion, as hereinabove pruvided for, Lessee shall pay as ihe monthly xenc for the leased piemises duriag [he renemal term in advance the folloving: � An amount eqoal to the monthly cent and moathly maintenance i£�8nasdetermined in Sections 3 and B iespectively of this lease, plus an inczease, Y Sn accocdance vith [he folloWing: As promptly as is prac�icable af[er notice by Lessee to Lessor of its inte�tion [o exerclse said option, Lessor shall deliver to Lessee a true copy of the U.S. Consumer Price IndeX -"for all Urban Consumers>" S[. Paul-4finneapo115 area Sssued 6y the BuzeBU of Labor Sta[is[ic5 of the U.S. Deparcment of Labor ("index") for the monch of December, 1981 ("base month") and for [he month this lease expires, November, 1984. ('�comparison mon[h"). 1n the event of an increase in [he index flgure for the comparison mon[h from Chat of the base month, an amoun[ shall be added to the mon[hiy renC and monthly maintenance rent a5 expressed in dollazss asais proportionala[o theaincreasa in the�index figure ftoms, - that of [he base month [o the compazison month. If at any time fiereaf[eY up [o the end of the comparisonmon[h, Che index no longez shall be publlshed or issued, ot shall 6e changed from its pzesen[ form, ihe pazties shall use such o[her measure of relative purchasing power as then shall be cecognized and accepced genezally for similar use or purpose as the index• In the even[ no such o[her measure shall be a�allable�, Lessor shall requezo riateucon�etsion Labor 5[a[istics of the U.S. Department of Labor to provide an app p or adjustmen[ fac[or vhith shall be apPlicable as of the appcopria[e adjus[ment daie and thereafter. . 21. SECURITY ➢EPOSIT m' 3i'o � Lessee agrees to pay to Lessot s securlty deposit in Che amount of $�?58'=08� vhich shall be held by Lessor. Said deposit shall 6e xefundihisoleaseee However�,Vinc the leased pxemises ate left in the conditian called foc by the event any ins[allmen[s of cen[ ace due and owingand retainpsuchiportionsrofntheon of thia lease, Lessox shall have the right Co app y secuci[y deposit as are necessa[y [o off5et said unpaid SnsTallments. In addi[ion, Lessot has [he right to apply and retain snch portions of the securit deposlt as aze necessaYy to remedy damage or was[e thaC has been incurred by the leased pxemisee. � - = 3 - 22. GOVEANMINT AUTHORI2ATION 21 Lessee shall not open for business on the leased�premises unless it first o6tains all necessary approvals, permits, licenses and any other gover�menCal authorizations needed to operate its business lavfully upon the leased premises. 23. EN7IRE AGREEMENT T'his lease cons[itutes the entire agreemen[ betveen the paz[ies. LESSOR: Menard by: LESSEE: . Dy: i[s: � �! � f.s:�J�.�� — 4 — (A C K N 0 W L E D G M C N T) STA7E DF�,7//llmn-S/✓ ) � . ZZ )se. COUNTY OF�Ar�C�•f�/li3 ) On this � day ofG�'�r,lR�v�zit, 19�, before me a Notary- Public vichin and for said County and 5[a[e, personelly appeazed �P /f,/ /L /N!„riAK% i//L to �{e personall�Y knovn, vho, being by me duly smorn did say [hat (s)he is [he � /��jiJ,�;r/ ot Menard, Inc., the corpora[ion named in the fore- going instrument, and that the seal effixed [o said instrumenC is the corporate seal of said corporation, and that said instrument vas eigned and sealed Sn be- hal o seid corporatiop by authority of its Soard oF Direc[ore and eaid ��/2 /YS,vifr/) /2 acknowledged,said instrument to be the free act and deed of said Gorporation. � L �,i.!✓ Notar Public /i+I/ZfLF� My Commission •xpiress'iv� /��'Y - (ACKNOWbEDGHEN'L-CORPORATE) STATE OF Minarsafic.-) � )es. COUNTY OF�nu /C�. ) . On ehia � day of L�c.�. , 19 d!1 . before'/me, a Notary Publ�e within and for sald Coun[y and SCate, personally appeared J">�rry .Sno%6.r/r<•_ [o,j^er personally knosrn� vho, being by me duly svorn did ay ChaC {s)he is the f�ret'it�e., t of tieJi�t A�✓Y'.CPr✓ , the corporation named in the foregoing ins[rument, and tha[ the s a�Hxed [o said instrumen[ is the cocporate seal of said tozporatlon, and that said instrument vas signed and sealed in behalf of said coxporation by authority of its Board of Directors and said y�s�n�r.�r .�urt.l�u/fe. acknovledged said instrument to be the free act and deed bf eaid corporation. 1�MMqA1MMi./• 1rVvNMnMA +MNfA�) ^ i,E';.,� to +n c-,:_-;� on Y ...,i i?1 �?tu� • s ' - � No[ary Pu61ic 9 �E � � � 1 �.q.- >. }fy CommlSSion Expires y=.�-�y YYWWYr'. ✓Y: � IiY rY tv M1�:SI, iY:':.J/a' � (ACKNOWLEDGMENT-PARTNERSIiIP} STATE OF ' ) ) ss. CO11NT1[ DF � ) On ehis _day of , 19_, before me, a Notary Public wi[hin and for said County and Sta[e, petaonally appeaxed to me personally knovn, vho, being by me duly svorn did say that (s)he is (the) (a) of , [he pax[necship named in th¢ foregoing in9tcumen[, and [ha[ said ins[rument vas 6lgned in behalf of said par[ner8hip and said atknowledged said Snstrument to be the free act and deed of said partne[ehip. Notaxy Public My Commission Expires . (ACKNOWLEDGMENT-INDIVIDUAL) 52ATE OF ) )ss. COUNTY OF )�� I, - , a No[ary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid, DO HEREBY CERTIFY tha[ and of vho (is) (are) pezsonally known Co me Go I�e the same person(s) whose name(s) (is) (are) subscribed to [he foregoing Snstrur�ent appeared before me this day in person and acknowledged tha[ (s)(he)(they) signed, sealed and delivered [he said Snstr�ment as (h )(their) free and voluntary act foT the use5 and purposed therein set foc[h. . GS.ven undeT my hand and notarial seal, this_day oF , 19� Notary PubLic My Commission Expires 23 �r � Y� N � C t _ W � PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNIN� COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a Publi� Hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, Apri1 7, 1982 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 P.M. for the purpose of: Consideration of an ordinance amending Chapter 205, Fridley Zoning Ordinance, of the Fridley City Code by adding Section 205.23, e�titled 5-2 Special District. This Ordinance shall be referred to as the "redevelopment district ordinance" in short form. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. VIRGINIA SCHNABEL CHAIRWOMAN PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: March 24, 1982 March 21, 1982 24 a�n�,r�ce t�. _ Atv OImIID1tiI� IMII�anINC QmP1ER 205 OF 1EE FItIDLEP CTPY �Os SY ALOiNG �(TIQi 205.23 H71'I7T.H) S-2 �HCIAL DI3�tiQ' 7T�e City Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: Chaptex 205; 2onirg, is heceby amende�3 by adding the following Section 205.23 - entitled S-2 �ecial niscict 205.23 S-2 Special District 205.231 Title This Ordinance shall be referred to as the "redevelopment district ordinance' in short form. 205.?32 Pucpose The purpoae of this special zoning district is to � 1. Allow for the mixed use development within special redevelopment districts set up under Chapter 462 of Minnesota State Statutes for the health, safety and general welfare of the City. 2. Allow for maxiiman flexibility in the promotion of diffiwlt redevelopnent pcojects. 3. Allow developnent by plan which is acceptable to and in the best interest of the City and overall district and development gtan. 205.233 Dses Pecmitted 1. Those uses which are acceptable to the overall redevelopment plan and specific develo�ment plans as appcoved by the City. 205.T39 Process for Approval 1. Plans for each individual project or combination of projects must be submitted to the Planning Commission for review and recam�endations to the City Council. The City Council shall t�ve final authoeity to appzove all pcoject plans. 2. Project plans submitted to the Planning Commission and City Council shall include as a minimian. a. Site plans showing location of buildings, off street p3rking, street and utility locations, access to and from the project, any �rodification needed to existing services, grading plans, storm water plans, and landscape plans. b. Written City staff review on project compatability to the werall redevelopnent plan. c. Written HxA report on project plan approval and considerations. 3. My substantial modification to the plan rtust be apprwed by the Planning Crnmission and City Council. PASSID AI�ID ADOPTm BY 7HE CITY NUNCIL OF 7HE CITY �' FRIDLEY THIS _ DAY OF , 1982. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAY((� � SIDNE7 C. IW�17SP7 - CITY Q.F7iR 25 � NOTICE is hereby given Commission �f the City Northeast on Wednesday, the purpose of: PUBLIC HEARIN6 BEF�RE THE PLANNING COMt�ISSION that there will be a Public Hearing of Fridley in the City Ha11 at 6431 April 7, 1982 at 7:30 p.m. in the of the Planning University Avenue Council Chamber for Consideration of a rezoning request, ZOA �82-03, by the City of Fridley, to establish a new Zoning District, 5-2 (Special Zoning District) and to rezone the following property to this district: Blocks 1, 2> 3, 4 and 5, Ree's Addition to Fridley Park, and Parcel 5000, described as that part of the West One Half of East One Half of the Southwest Quarter described as follows: Commencing at a point 390 feet East of the Northwest corner of the East One Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 14, 7-30, R-24; thence South 8 rods and ]A feet; thence East 10 Rods, thence North 8 rods and 10 feet; thence West 10 rods, to place of beginning, and Parcel 5�5�, described as that part of the West One lialf of the Northeast Quarter of the South- west Quarter of Section 14, T-30, R-24; and thet part of Ree's Addtion to Fridley Park and vacated alley in said subdivision, described as follows: beginning at a point on the North line of said West One Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distar��e of 3J feet West_of the Noriheait corner thereof, thence South and parallel with the East line thereof, a distance of 194 feet more or less to the South line of Lot 1, Block 2, Ree's Addition to Fridley Park, said point 6eing the Southeast corner of said lotl, thence West along the South line of said Lot 1 and Lot 22, a distance of 179.3 feet; thence North and parallel with East line of said North line; thence East to the point of beginning,subject to an easement over the North 33 feet thereof for road purposes. and Block 1, Auditor's Subdivision No. 59 (Parcels 100 and 105) . From a mixture of R-1 {single family dwelling areas), C-1 (local business areas), C-2 (general business areas), M-1 (light industrial areas) and P(public facilities areas), all to be rezoned to 5-2 (special Zoning District) Generally located between University Avenue N.E. and 5th Street N.E. and from Mississippi Street N.E. South to 63rd Avenue N.E. Page 2(S-2 Special Zoning District) Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter may be heard at the above time and place. VIRGINIA SCHNABEL CNRIRWDMAN PLANNING COMMI55ION Publish: March 24, 1982 March 31, 1982 27 CtTY OF FSaIDLEY, SUBJECT 6431 UNlVER51?Y AVE. NE. FRIOLCY� MN. 65a3e f6921,�77-345� ZONING ACTION VACATION PLAT ORDINANCE NO �� ZOA � SAU # PS � PUBLISHED DATE `��'i"� �' �� PLANNING COMMISSION APPROYED_ DISAPPROVED_ DATE %�f�y NO 7- CITY COUNCIL: PUBLIC HEARII�G �ATE 1ST READ 2ND READ CITV C011iJCIL: APPROVED^ DISAPPROVED____ DATE NO PARK FEE REQUIRED: AMOUNT PRID STIPULATIONS: NAME : � STREET LOCATION 0� PROPERTY� FEE RECEIPT NO �� LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY_�� / � 3 � `�S �'"n° �N � _ ` _ ' �� PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION :� L L�EXISTING USE�OF PROPERTY_7��_,�-..-� ACREAGE Of PROPERTY S�SCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROPOSED Z01J1NG CLASSIFICATION OR TYPE OF USE AND IMP VEMENT'PROPOSED � �.ri.� GCc.I�,�' S� �' i�"�l'1�-� � � �2/�' Has the present applicant previously sought to rezone, plat, obtain a lot split or variance or special use permit on the subject site or part of it? __,yes �no. What aras requested and when? The undersigned understands that: (a) A list of all residents and owners of proper- ty within 350 feet must be attached to this application. (6) This applicatiori must be signed by all o�vners of the property, or an explartation given whY this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any defect in the proceedings resultin9 from the failure to list the naines and addresses of all resid2nts and �roperty owners of pro- perty in question, belongs to the undersigned. A sketch of proposed property and structure must be dra�an and attached, showing the follotaing: 1. North direction. 2. Location of p mposed strur_ture on the lot. 3. Dimensions of property, proposed structure, and front and side setbacks, 4. Street names. 5. Location and use of adjaCent existing buildings (�•rithin 350 feet). The undersigned he�•eby.declares that all ts and this applicaiion are true and correct. � DATE � J °z"S� g y SIGNA tions �tated in ADDRESS C��7'"'."`� /L�;i� = %v Y3I �� 'J � • TCLEPHONE NO .S�% /� 3 �l �� MAILING LIST S-2 City of Fridley Special Zoning District Kenneth W. Bodin & Steven Hardel 332 64th Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Dr. Ryan's Automotive Clinic b389 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Allan Singer 378 64th Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Arthur & Dorothy Smith 362 64th Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 James & Sadi�@ Messi �ger 260 Mayberry Avenue North Port, Fla 33596 P4r. & Mrs. Walter Ek 6359 University Avenue Fridley, Mn 55432 Eleanor Singer 378 64th Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Planning CommissionMarch 26", 1982 City Council 3- ,�v—�� Mr. & Mrs. Ronald Nienaber 6251 5th Street N.E. Fridley> Pin 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Howard Nelson 6261 5th Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Albert McClimek 6271 5th Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. William Sims 6281 5th Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 William Berry Fridley State Bank 6315 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 E, G. Hayano, C. 5pieker, Dave Harris and 4teaver, Talie & Herrick 6279 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Pin 55432 Fridley Covenant Church Rev. Donald Lundquist 6390 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Sue Gooden 415 63rd Avenue N.E. fridley, Mn 55432 Rodney W. Billman 151 Silver Lake Road New Brighton, Mn 55112 Mr. & Mrs. Reginald Cobb 6231 6th Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Leslie Coyle 6271 6th Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Herbert Evans 6261 6th Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Terry 0'Connell Northern Cablevision 350 fi3rd Avenue N.E. fridley, Mn 55432 D & C. Investment Co. 6379 University Avenue N.E. Fridley> Mn 55432 J & W Building Account 8470 Center Drive tl.E. Minneapolis, Mn 55432 Madsen Building Company 6441 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 �ai M. Suh The Towle Company 600 2nd Avenue South Minneapolis, Mn 55402 Gift Nouse Stamps, Inc. The Towle Company 212 6th Street Minneapolis, Mn 55402 29 S-2 City of Fridley Special Zoning District Page 2 Carlson-Lavine, Inc. 2831 Aldrich Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 5541D8 55�Dg Mr. & Mrs. Duane Jor9enson 288 Mercury Drive N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Clark 266 Mercury Drive N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Mark Sampson 271 Sylvan Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Robert Hosman 281 Sylvan Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Michael McPhillips 291 Sylvan Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. William Camp, Jr. 6280 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, M� 55432 Phillips Petroleum Company 755 New Ballas Road S. 5t. Louis, Mo 63141 Borris A. Zile 431 Mississippi Street N.E. Fridley> Mn 55432 David N. Bestland 421 Mississippi Street N.E Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Bennett Sorum 411 Mississippi Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Arlan D. Anderson 401 Mississippi Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. George Meissner 373 hiississippi Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Clifford A. Nelson 365 Mississippi Street N.E Fr�d�� , Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Otto Marsolek 365 MississipQi Street N.E. Fridley> Mn 55432 Thiesen Partnership Norma 6wanson 361 Rice Creek Terrace Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Roger Harmon 388 66th Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Ellsworth Hinz 384 66th Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. John Halling 380 66th Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 John Hitzman 378 65th Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 E. Mr. & Mrs. Harold Ohlsson 376 66th Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Margaret E. Johanson 374 66th Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Donald Hinz 372 66th Avenue N.E. Fridley, P1n 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Sylvester Klous 370 66th Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Donald Bennethum 368 6bth Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Fridley Apartments ' 790� Xerxes Avenue South Minneapolis, Mn 55431 Fridley Apartments 460 Mississippi Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Anoka County Library Jerry Young 707 Highway 10 Blaine, MN 55432 3� �, t46�2<S�f 2B° F o . -,�t�;:x� . � , � 3,�:, � L I r. 7 / �/ f� .� . ` v _ _ - rR /�1M� � �......_.. . ` / ,�r ._"z "" ", I 6460 � � i � _� _ � � 6450 x ' 1 � Zf � . P�...; i QV 6410 � N _. -� o ;_ z�/y ,:.�. F� .W %YIIY ra�n�� ' - , / � i��' ..,.- M r: ` :.. 1 ,�'-f *y ��'� .-w��r- G , ' Fe - .,<, _ ,°;��`LANE , , +'"� �. .� !�/!� • M . . K � h t , .�• "` i I _ /! a s �1 s � r - M1� ' 7 ! � � s �" �� .,,. . �•+s � 'i ,�. f1 h }� �+� I� i3 M •"'. i-` - �"i� v � d�' � i �- ` � � � ! /Ir Nt /t .�/�/'�- �Qi "� ' z6J 2%.l �Ie�A _ � " ��jS '�Y�� I 4.� "�ff� t� i !14 � , � � ; i� � FRCt}�Y �-y.ORfVE -�; •_ � I �� - �. 3. v n a'�f 'Y �. � 4 - ' �ka' � � ' �, � aadbttba Cwnpaey 4 .6 ' �� '..._ 'i BiniNw � I.�g 24 ZS Z�a6 �aa _`+_ /nsw-/aln'L ,'� , �/(� 278 2gA:� � �. �3�s � , - `�Y / M le+� >)II �' � �S/.I�i/�eJ�(I.Qf/,i�I ��1111 �' � i 291 � � �•y ,f �; ,> . �, F_ • AUDki ORS � 251 Z61 � ��' . ,,..�. 2�TI 28! .�.1'•. » t .�' :t-- : -';=�nr ., r`.°�w i, n w✓ f Y,: �� i._, �a�C'�Y�If/J ;�. �5�� bti�l� ` � ;t=.-�i�(�i��-.`. ; �' �� - ,�.. _ �-��.` _ —' _:,a. - .,�,-. �;: : .. .- ; �...., � � 6� w. " zs6 -;, z�o� 1r ,�`�'° yw � 9 3 ��`� p�,ti � 7 .; ' ' z$o : :;;v'� � l,�� „1 - - - ,, w � : �Z ,� z60 . ..lE:: _ �: ' , �� . _ ° -=� bt�9 SUa iVi$10� `". , „ „ � �' + rr 4 N „ � 6260 `�'�. �o..,.;s�r .�� e ;cQ .0 ,..+.1 t r • � �, 6 � � ; • � b275 Q � R �`c,z4o 6zso .� (sso) � . bzso . : _ • �/'1.,. `o bN�o � DRIV� ► � � K _ ,,, ,. , � j j. b2�5 N0. 59 `� _� *, b�3, bsA� `bL��`bib� �� _ I 4� — ' "� ---G i �= � �� :b1 � � � � ; . _�'~ —_i 4�� f , ,. ` �. o� �.P ,:(�� N, .< �n :� aI �r u_ � � .A� _� i" �V � , 31 f p ��O 420 �40 I 1 ! / : '� `�� `,e �. � i � ~ �� ,:�! ._��- `_�_�� . �,�.ICE � �� 6951 / ,s` � � tI l ! :� �y':./i/��/� � � ~ � ; ` ' .�0.aineN l Ulill�� ! ' E�u�al � 23 22 2/ ?0 /9 v ;�': ^SIS 431 4� 45< . .. Wp'_. � . M A �}�l' � 90-� �� : 'a i o .�.a: = re �.' �� : ; �E � : �: I 6Z�f �b l�a ; ir,z . __ �rvj �rtda� + �-_ �z�r 6Z�o ; : .� �: /tl6 1 S• . �' ^ 62�� 6� .� q 6� �..� ria:a G24t 62S o; i 4� ; � �ce.sr _ bZ3i _ 6z3o 6: 62Y� Q� 6Z�i i ,�. e201 0 0;`. ...- 4i q 5 . 1 00'� �yJ � _': i = CITY OF FRIDLEY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AU7HORITY MEETING MARCH 11, 1982 CALL.TO �RDER: Vice-Chairperson Houck called the March 11, 1982, Housing & Redevelopment Authority meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLI GALL: Members Present: Russell Houck, Elmars Prieditis, Carolyn Svendsen, Duane Prairie Members Absent: Larry Co�ners Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner Scott Wheeler, Planning Intern Dennis Schneider, Councilman See attached list APPROVAL Of FEBRUARY 17, 1982, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. PRIEDITIS� SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRIE� TO APPROVE THE FEBRUARY 17� 1982� HOUSZNG 6 REDEVELOPMENT RUTHORITY MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON NOUCK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRZED UNANIMOUSLY, I. CENTER CITY PROJECT A. Phase III - Development Selection Mr. Boardman stated three development teams were at the meeting to give presentations. Each development team was being given one-half hour for the presentation and to answer questions from the HRA. 1. American Redevelopers, Inc.(7:00 - 7:30) Mr. Orrin Ericson stated he is the President of American Redevelopers, Inc. He introduced Paul Pink, his architect, and three other gentlemen from the office who are in leasing and management, �im Peterson, Scott Ericson, and Tom Quosius. He stated they would like to show what they have done, what they are doing, and what they are interested in. He stated Mr. Pink would show slides of a redevelopment project they did in Mankato, Minnesota, along with some other redevelopments they have worked with. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMEN7 AU7HORITY MEETING, MARCH 11, 1982 ?AGE 2 Mr. Pink stated the Mankato redevelopment was a downtown redevelop- _ ment and was completed in 1978. It consisted of malling over the downtown area to the extent that all of the main street became a mall. There were 17 existing tenants, and they brought in 60 new tenants. Mr. Pink stated that Barclay Square is a fashion mail tfiey will begin construction on in Rochester, Minnesota, in July 1982. They anticipate completion by July 1983. Ne stated it is a two-level high fashion mall. It has a split level parking lot so that the lower lot goes into the first floor, and the upper lot goes into the second level. The mall will contain about 120,000 sq. ft. of fine shops and restaurants. Mr. Pink stated the largest project they are working on is a $100,000 project in New York City. They have been working on it for about three years. It is a four-level maii and nine-story office tower. Construction wili probably begin about one year from now. Mr. Pink stated this was just a brief hackground and scale of the work they do. He stated he has been the architect for Hoily Shopping Center and Rice Plaza and what was the Fridley Hardware Store, He has been the architect on those parcels for the last 18 years, so he is familiar with the problems in the area, the draihage, traffic, and the other problems--both architecturally and engineering-wise. If they are selected as the architects and developers, it wi11 just be a continuation of an 18-year history in the same area. Mr, Ericson stated Fridley has a population of 30,000 people spread over a two-mile radius, and he felt those people are sorely lacking in good quality stores put into one area. He thought if they put something here with quality, whether one-story or two-story, the City would be surprised and pleased at the number of tenants who would come in. He stated they felt all three corners could stand some rehabilitation, and they are prepared to do and submit various plans on a periodic basis until they arrive at one that is agreeable to everyone. They have already talked to a number of tenants, and they know they can 9et it pretty well leased, but it has to be done very professionally in order to let the people know there is going to be something with substance instead of just a bunch of stores. Mr. Ericson stated the first sma]7 enclosed center they did was in Willmar, Minnesota, and that turned out very well. He stated they are proposing a 100,000 sq, ft, shopping center and 40,000 sq. ft. entertainment/office on Fridley's site. He stated he has some ideas for making the best use of the Holly area where they would eliminate all the old buildings and put in multiples and/or offices. He stated if they are selected, they could present some projections on that. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETIN6, MARCH 11, 1982 PAGE 3 Mr. Prairie asked if t4r. Ericson saw financing or interest rates " as a problem. Mr. Ericson stated they are a problem, but they see a light at the end of the tunnel. Just recently they have been talked to by a couple of pension funds, as well as small insurance companies, who are interested in coming into these kind of situations. If the interest rates don't come down, they would se11 the project to an instituti0n, either a pension fund or insurance company, so they could get the job done. They would be prepared to come in with some good plans and explain how long it would take to do the job. If they are not able to do it. they will be honest and tell the City that. He stated they believe in quality in their projects. Mr. Prieditis asked Mr. Ericson what the time period would be to get lease commitments. Mr. Ericson stated it would take six months and then about another six months to start construction. He would estimate about lZ-2 yrs. from now until everything was completed. Mr. Prieditis asked what Mr. Ericson visualized as the major tenants. Mr. Ericson stated he would like to see the area anchored by a good drugstore, good market, a junior department store, a hardware store, and some children's and ladies' ready-to-wear stores. Mr. Boardman stated he has briefly discussed with Mr. Ericson the limitations that the HRA has in assisting with the project. Knowing these limitations, was American Redevelopers still interested in the project? Mr. Ericson stated they know what the limitations are with state and local governments, and they would have to work within those confines. He stated they are very interested in the projeci. Mr. Houck thanked Mr. Ericson and Mr. Pink for their presentation. 2. Nolmen Development Company (7:30 - 8:OD) Mr. Holmen stated he had brought with him Pat Hallisey, Uice President in charge of Leasing, and Duane Nelson, their director of construction on shopping centers. He stated they are a small company, and he would leave a brochure that outlined some of their capabilities, some projects they have done, and some references. Mr. Holmen stated Holmen Development Co. was formed in 1975 to develop, lease, manage, and own shopping centers. Since that time, they have developed a 260,000 sq. ft. cenier in Watertown, S.D. Major tenants are J.C. Penney, K-Mart, and Herberger's Dept. Store. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTNORITY MEETING, MARCH 11, 1982 PAGE 4 Mr. Holmen stated that within the past year, they have built and opened an enclosed shopping center in Beaver Dam, Wisc. Major tenants are J. C, Penney, F. W. Woolworth and Woolco Store, Herberger's, and approx. 100,000 sq. ft, of smail shops, They are presently under development for a center of about the same size in Williston, N.D. Mr. Holmen stated their method of operating to date has not been to operate in larger metropolitan areas. They have generally been operating in the mid-western cities in North & South Dakota, Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and they build shopping centers that range in size from 100,000 sq. ft. to 350-400,000 sq. ft. They are presently involved in the development of a major downtown mall in Mason City, Iowa. In that development, they have a joint venture agreement with the center companies, which were formerly Dayton-Hudson Properties. With that same company, they are developing a major mall in Dekalb, I11., and the center companies have joined them in that particular endeavor. Mr. Holmen stated they are also working on several downtown redevelop- ment projects, including one major redevelopment in Walla Walla, Washington, In addition to suburban malls, they made the decision to include in their concentration several urban redevelopment and downtown projects. Mr. Holmen stated his personal experience in the shopping center development field goes back to T964 when he came from Texaco, Inc., as a Division Reai Estate Agent and joined a company called Crossroads Centers, which was a successful company that developed centers, ranging in size from 110,000 to 750,000 sq. ft. Following that, he joined Watson Construction Co. as head of their deveTopment team. He worked with them for several years and developed more centers in the Midwest. Then, in 1975,they founded their own company. Mr. Holmen stated they will not have a slide presentation, but he can tell the NRA that they do have substantial experience in deveToping shopping centers. They have a very capab]e leasing staff, and they are quite capab7e and have considerable knowledge and experience in construction. Duane Nelson has been with some of the largest builders in the Twin Cities area, and he has had substantial experience in shoppin9 centers and commercial buildings, free standing buildings, ski lodges, etc. For the project here in Fridley, they would bring in an additional equity partner, because they feel this project is going to need a substantial equity partner in order to beceme a successful development. They have interested equity partners who join them in these ventures, He stated their contractor would be a strong and experienced general contractor in the Twin Cities, and they have two they would like to choose from. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, MARCH 11, 1982 PAGE 5 Mr. Holmen stated he has fiad several conversations with Mr. Boardman - about the project here in fridley, and they have prepared several approaches to this project. One approach he really liked and felt would be very interesting but may not be too workable or realistic, is the relocation of Mississippi St. He stated it would be most interesting if they could pull the proposed entertainment center on the east side of University into the project and meld that with the retail portion that is proposed for the west side of llniversity and include a rather nice enclosed mall at that time so they would have a project that woul� more incorporate and bring functions together. Again, he did not know if that was practical or feasib7e. Mr. Holmen stated it was their understanding that the City wanted an enclosed mall shopping center on the proposed site. Their feelings at this iime is that it would not be practical. They think an enclosed sidewalk might be more practical, and their second approach would include using the existing hardware store {probably using it as a hardware store) and bend an enclosed sidewalk center around in a rather interesting fashion and include three major tenants in the mall. The major tenants would be a hardware store, supermarket, and drugstore, together with a restaurant, and some interesting mall shops, most generally focused toward the service type of shopping center. He thought if they were looking for an enclosed �ype mall center in this location, they would be disappointed, given the restrictions on the property. Mr. Holmen stated they have several layouts they have worked on and would like the opportunity to show what they can do on the site, 7hey do know the problems on site and with the tenants. He felt they were practical enough to know what can be built on the site and would like the opportunity to do that. Mr, Prairie asked how many centers Holmen Development Co. has started or gotten off the ground in the last 2-2z years. Mr, Holmen stated there was just one major one, but there are many in the development process. He invited any of the HRA members to visit their latest center in Beaver Dam, Wisc., in order to see the type of work they do, Mr. Houck thanked Mr.Nolmen for his presentation. Jim Vassar {Barthel Construction) (8:00 - 8:30) Mr. Dean �oyscher stated it has always been his feeling that there were some local people involved in the previous project who showed good faith. The limited partnership that was put together did involve local people, and he had told Ken Barthel of Barthel Con- struction that it would be important to keep that partnership together. That has, in fact, happened. HOUSING & REDEVELOAMEN7 AUTHORITY MEETING MARCH 11 1982 PAGE 6 Mr. Vassar stated Dr. Suh, Ron 5hoeneman, and Dave Fuerstenberg are _ those interested peop]e. He stated he has been trying to help formulate a team that can work together and get something done. He stated he thought they now had a good action group. Mr. Doyscher stated a lot of people had come with them to the meeting, but the important thing is that every one of these people has a skill level that needs to be involved all the way through this process. Ne stated one of the things a development team with an effort of this size needs is to coordinate these efforts with the City. There are going to be relocation schedu7es and acquisition schedules on the part of the City. Those schedu]es mast be coordinated with the developer, and he will act as coordinator between the developer and the City. Mr. Doyscher introduced �ick Larsen and Marlin Nutchinson, who are both architects. Mr. Hutchinson stated they had a preTiminary drawing that was put together without a great deal of input from the HRA or the community. They intend to refine it and make it suitable. He stated Mr. Larsen is a long term architect with a lot of experience in shopping centers. He is presently an HRA member in the City of Minnetanka and a former City Council member, so he is well versed in governmental action. He asked Mr. Larsen to explain the pr�iiminary drawing. Mr. Larsen stated this is just a concept plan for the development of a small mall shopping center, He understood the site is approx. 8.7 acres, and they did not include the Burger King property. They felt they could develop about 86,000 sq. ft: of new retail space. He stated they picked up on some of the features from the previous plan that Jim Vassar's group had worked on. He stated all the shops will work off the interior mall with the exception of a proposed restaurant on the corner. He stated that as far as landscaping, they 7ike to design shopping centers with some of the green area up around the building. Typically, especially with smaller centers, all the ]andscaping is out at the street where it looks nice, but no one can really use it, and the rest is paved right up to the front door. He stated they have done a couple of centers where they have reversed that and put a majority of the greenery around the building. It really gives a different kind of atmosphere and different feeling. Mr. Nutchinson stated they have indicated a larger open space in the center of the mall where some community-type activities can take place. Mr. Larsen stated there are 86,000 sq. ft. of leaseable area. The malls are about 9,200 sq. ft. for a total of appox. 95,000 sq. ft. which does include the free-standing restaurant. They have 431 parking spaces which works o�t to a parking ratio of 5 cars per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross Teaseable area. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, MARCH I1, 1982_ PAGE 7 Mr. Hutchinson introduced Laura Manske, who is with Barthel Construction, and is mainly concerned with leasing and lease negotiations. He stated she is also an attorney. Ms. Manske stated she is actively working in-house with Barthel in the leasing department. She has been very active in the leasing field and feels most confident they can put together a leasing package for this project. She would like to describe one of the shopping center projects they have going at this time in Elk River. The reason she wanted to describe it was because it does have a lot of similarities to Fridley. (1) They are approximate�y the same size; (2) it is a project that others have tried to develop in the past, but have never gotten off the ground. Barthel now has it off the ground and well on the way to putting it together; (3) a lot of the tenants they have been dealing with in E1k River are the same tenants that have been proposed for Fridley. Ms. Manske stated that although it may seem premature, she has been talking to the anchor tenants in the E7k River shopping center about the Fridley project and has gotten a mutual agreement that future talk may be in order, assuming they get the development rights to the Fridley project. Ms. Manske introduced Ken Barthel, President of Barthel Construction. Mr. Barthel stated that in the past year, they have completed projects totalling approximately $17 million. These projects con- sisted of shopping centers, office warehouses, restaurants, etc. Mr. Barthel introduced Jerome Hertel of Juran done some other projects with them, and who is the financing portion ot it. Moody, who has very familiar with Mr. Hertel stated Juran & Moody has done some projects in the City of Fridley. He stated they have given the HRA a brochure which outlines the activities they have been involved with. They have worked with Mr. Barthel for a couple of years in putting together financing for some of the commercial projects he has developed. They are very familiar with financing shopping centers, as well as free-standing retail centers. They are involved with the Elk River project. He stated it is their intention at some point in time to approach the City of Fridley and request tax exempt financing for this project and to work with Mr. Barthel and the rest of the group in completing that financing. Mr. Barthel introduced Bob Zeller from M. A. Mortenson & Co. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, MARCH 11 1982 PAGE 9 Mr. Boardman stated the HRA sets timetables primarily for performance. If at some time, the developer has been making adequate performance, there is the possibility of an extension, The HRA will be looking . at performance, and extensions will be based on performance. Mr. Houck thanked everyone representing Barthel Construction for coming and making their presentation, (Mr. Houck declared a ten-minute recess at 8:40 p.m.) Mr. Boardman stated he would like the HRA to take some action tonight in selecting a developer. He would also like them to rank the development teams or put them in some kind of priority so that in 30 days if the HRA feels the #1 development team's drawings are not adequate, they can go to the next development team. Mr. Boardman stated the NRA members had a"Reference Review" report included in their agenda which outlined the findings he had gotten about the different development teams from talking to outside people. Mr. Prieditis stated he liked to see the local people involved, and most of the locals are involved with the Barthel group. As far as the design potential, it really depends upon the monies the group has and how successful they are in getting tenants in. He thought American Redevelopers had the most impressive looking project and the best feel, but he did not think they should go just by that. The most impressive group for imagination and excitement was the Barthel group, and maybe that group is in the position to do a more successful project. He stated Mr. Holmen was very realistic and seemed to know what he was talking about. Mr. Prairie stated he thought it was just too difficult to make a decision on a developer based on a one-half hour presentation. There is just not enough information to go on. Mr. Boardman stated the main thing the HRA has to look at is that, realistically, each of these development teams is going to do approximately the same job, in the sense that all of them are talking about 80-90,000 sq. ft, of commercial/retail. He did not think the City would get involved in the relocation of Mississippi St, or with the purchase of Holly Center, because of the expense involved. It is a matter of which developer's presentation gave the HRA a comfortable feeling about their ability to produce. Mr. Prairie stated that Mr. Holmen may be the most practica7 of all the developers. Ms. Svendsen stated that, after their first experience witn �nr, rceisauen, she was very concerned about the level of commitment on the part of the develo er to get the project done. She felt the Barthel group had perhaps P HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING MARCH 11, 1982 PAGE 10 a little edge on that because they have so many iocal people involved, _ putting in their own money, and some of whom wi11 be tenants in the project. She also thought maybe they need to take a little more time to do more investigating. Mr. Prairie asked if they coutd ask each of the developers to present something more detailed within a month. Mr, Prieditis stated a sketch of the project does not take too long to put together, and it would give the HRA an indication of each developer's interest. Mr. Boardman stated he had no problem with that if it wouTd help the HRA make a decision. If they do that, then he would ask Watson Centers if they could make a presentation at that time also. They were unable to come to this meeting. The HRA members agreed they would like each developer to present some type of concept drawing in a proposal to the HRA. They asked Mr. Boardman to send a letter to each developer requesting that each developer submit. some conceptual plans and any other meaninaful information at a special meeting on Thursday, April Y, at 7;30. The HRA will make a decision on a developer at that meeting. B, Phase I 1. Award Bid for Removal of Christensen Building Mr. Boardman stated Ted Renollet was the lowest bidder at $]0,840. Ne would recommend the HRA award the bid to him, MOTION BY MR. PRAIRIE� SECONDED BY MR. PRIEDITZS, TO AWARD TXE BID FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE CHRISTENSEN BUILDING TO RENOLLET TRUCKZNG� INC., OF ANDOVER� MINNESOTA. . UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CXAIRPERSON HOUCK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. , 2, Update on Telephone Building (Memo No. 82-?4 from Executive Director) Mr. Boardman stated that after writing this memo, he has discussed acquisition of the telephone building with Mr. Wyeth, owner of the property. Mr. Wyeth is not interested in selling and is firm at $275,OD0. There is no room for acquisition. Mr. Boardman stated Mr. Wyeth wil) be going into a contract with Northwestern Bell, The contract they are looking at is $16,000/yr. It is a five-year contract with two 5-year options. Mr. Prairie asked what happens one year from now if the HRA does not buy the property. Is there any kind of a time problem? HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, MARCH 11, 1982 PAGE 11 Mr. Boardman stated it was hard to say. If they get construction underway with the clinic and an office building, they may be able to put in another project relatively quickly. If they did acquire the telephone building, they would try to enter into a year lease agreement with Northwestern Bell. He did not feel anything would happen for at least a year. Mr. Haggerty stated Mr. Wyeth has built a number of office/warehouses in recent years in Blaine, so he is very cognizant af the cost of building a building like that. Ne is looking at what it would cost to replace the building. From that perspective, Mr. Wyeth feels $275,000, considering the location and the tenant, is a very reasonable offer. Mr. Boardman stated the fact is that Mr. Wyeth is a willing seller at $275,000. The lease is up with Northwestern Seil, and it looks positive to release with the telephone company. The question is: Does the HRA want to purchase at this time or delay? The HRA has the money to purchase, they have the opportunity to lease the building, and he felt it will just cost more money if they wait and have to go into acquisition and condemnation. Mr. Prieditis stated that because the owner of the property is not willing to negotiate and because he did not think the NRA should set a precedent of not having negotiations to arrive at a reasonable price, he would recommend they not acquire this property at this time, MOTION BY MR, PRIEDITIS� SECONDED BY MS. SVENDSEN, TO NOT PROCEED WITH THE ACQUISITION OF THE TELEPHONE BUILDING PROPERTY AT SHTS 27ME. Ms. Svendsen stated she felt it may be five yars before the City would even need that property, and she also did not like the idea of setting a precedent of not compromising on a price. UPON R VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON HOUCK DECLARED TXE MOTION C.ARRIED UNRNIMOUSLY. Ms. Svendsen asked if there was any way the lease could be set up so that it would not be renewable. Mr. Boardman stated he would talk to Mr. Haggerty about this to see if there was any way Mr. Wyeth could put in a stipulation that if the property is condemned by the City, he has no obligations and all options are terminated. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, MARCH 11, 1982 PAGE 12 C. Letter from And Merr Juran & Mood on Financi - ar inic Memo No. 82- 9 from Executive �rect MOTION BY MR. PRIEDITIS� SECONDED BY MS. SVENASEN� TO RECEIVE THE LETTER FROM ANDY MERRY OF JURAN & MOODY DATED MARCH 5� 1982. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VFCE-CHAIRPERSON HOUCK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRSED UNANIMOUSLY. � Mr. Boardman stated he was trying to get a fattnalized.,commitment on financing from Juran & Moody, and this really was not that firm a cor�nitment, because there are still some conditions. He stated Mr. Haggerty has talked to Tim Signore7li, and Mr. Signorelli is pushing Juran & Moody. Mr. Boardman stated that based on the conditions that have come up with Mr. Haggerty and the building he is proposing (Item I-D), he would like to get some appraisals at this time on the properties so the City is in the position to start acquisition as soon as possible. Juran & Moody are saying they can commit to a financing, but they cannot commit to a percentage, So, they would recommend the HRA take an option on the property until they get the financing put together. Mr, Boardman stated he did not think the HRA wanted to get involved in that kind of thing, but he thought they should get the appraisais and start moving toward acquisition. MOTION BY hIIi. PRIEDITIS� SECONDED BY MS. SVENASEN� TO AUTHORS2E THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO GET RPPAAISAIS ON THE COLUMBIA PARK CLINIC/ OFFZCE PROPSRTIES. � UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHAZRPERSON HOUCK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. D, Phase II 1.. 30,000 sq. ft. Office Building (Memo No. 82-18 from Executive Director) Mr. Boardman stated that Mark Haggerty has presented a letter to the NRA. He asked Mr, Haggerty to review the letter with the HRA. Mr. Ha§gerty stated that he had lunch with Mr. Chuck Michae7son of Owens, Ayers Company on Monday, March 8. They discovered they hot a lot of ideas in common. He stated he knew the building next to his law firm will'be coming down, and they had to make some decisions about relocating. On Friday, he had gone to market with an 9ndustrial revenue bond and discovered the market is turning around tremendously, Ne stated Owens, Ayers is a]so looking for an office building. Since his law firm has the financing and the financial strength and Owens, Ayers has the financial strength and tenants, he and Mr. Michaelson mutualTy agreed to build the building at lunch on Monday. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, MARCH 11, 1982 PAGE 13 Mr. Haggerty stated that since Monday, they have come up with the - equity, so they now have the financing and the equity. They are proposing to buy 20,000 sq. ft. from the City for $2/sq. ft. and they would ask that the City defer the payments over a period of time. The other thing would be to have the City build the parking lot that is partial7y the City's and theirs, and ihe cost estimate for landscaping and the parking lot would 6e $104,0�0. He would ask that they be allowed to go on a long term lease paying $1,OOOJmonth, which would be a fully amortized 30-year mortgage at 11% for $104,000. Then, on the 31st year, they would buy the parking 1ot for $1. Mr. Haggerty stated the maximum bond they can get for this building is $1,250,000 because of the rents. They were $500,000 short, so they have to come up with $500,000 in cash. Owens, Ayers has agreed to put in about 75% of that. Owens, Ayers would build the building, put in their profits, do the architectural and engineering, and that would roughly equal 75%. The law firm would do the legal work, plus put in the cash difference, which would give them approximate]y 25% ownership. That is how they arrived at the ownership. Mr. Haggerty stated the reason he requested this be on the agenda tonight is because they need to find out if they can actually sell bonds with a firm commitment from the City saying 64th Ave. would be vacated and this land would be purchased, He stated he would like to issue bonds in the first week of April. 7hen he would know they would have 100� financing with their equity and would definitely be able to construct in May. Mr. Haggerty stated they will work with the Columbia Park Clinic's architects so their building and the Clinic's building will be built in tandem and constructed so they are aesthetically compatible. Mr. Haggerty stated the building will have 24,000 sq, ft, of rentab7e space. Smith, Juster, Feikema will rent 2,000 sq. ft. and Owens, Ayers will have 5,000 sq. ft. They wo�ld master lease the rest of the building. Mr. Boardman stated that if the City knows the financing is there, they would like ta put this into their street project, which is going to be let out for bids in April. 7hey will get a better price that way. Mr. Haggerty stated all they need from the City is a commitment that would allow them to build the building basica7ly the way it is proposed as far as the layout of the parking. The HRA would still have a say in what the building looks like and the type of land- scaping. They are basically going to match it to the Columbia Park Clinic building. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORI7Y MEETING, MARCN 11, 1982 PAGE 14 Mr, Boardman stated the HRA should consider that it is not only a - right to proceed, but a right to proceed with the conditions that are laid out. He did not think the HRA was in any position at this meeting to take that action. He stated he would want to have contract documents drawn up so contract documents can be entered into prior to the time Mr. Haggerty goes for a sale of bonds. He thought that cou7d be done relatively quickly. Mr. Boardman stated that Mr. Haggerty is concerned about the foilowing three issues: 1. $2/sq. ft. for 20,000 sq. ft. of 7and under the building, delay the purchase price on that for maybe four years with interest starting at the faurth year. 2. Parking lease at 11.25% interest at $1,000/month, starting one year after they pull the buiTding permit, 3. A firm commitment from the City that the City acquire the road and the private property so they can obtain good title. Mr. Prairie stated he thought they should move ahead with this. He saw a lot of pluses and no minuses. Mr. Prieditis stated he agreed. The HRA set a special meeting for Wed., March 24, at 5:30 p.m., at which time they wouTd have the development contracts from Mr. Haggerty for approval. Mr. Haggerty could then take the necessary action for the sale of bonds. Mr, Boardman stated he and Mr. Haggerty will sit down and get all the documents set up so they can enter into contract documents at the March 24th meeting. It is his understanding that the HRA feels these conditions are acceptable conditions if the figures work out. Ne stated that, so far, everything looks good. MOTION BY M5. SVENDSEN� SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRIE� THET THE CONDITIONS LAID OUT BY MR. XAGGERTY FOR A PROPOSED 30�000 SQ. FT. OFFICE BUILDING SEEM AGREEABLE� CONDFTIONED ON THE ARRANGEMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTS WHICX WILL BE BROUGHT BACK TO THE HRR FOR APPROVAL AT A SPECIRL MEETING ON WED.� MARCH 24� 1982� AT 5:30 P.M. UPON R VOICE VOTE� RLL VOTSNG AYE� VICE-CXAIRPERSON XOUCK DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, Mr. Haggerty stated he appreciated the HRA's good response and apologized for the time factor. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEE7ING, MARCH 11 1982 PAGE 15 IT. MOORE LAKE PROJECT A. Phase I 1. Update from Cheryl Nybo on Office Project Mr. Boardman stated they do have documents from Cheryl Nybo from Eberhardt for the financing commitment. At this time, Ms. Nybo has not signed those commitment documents. One of the reasons is she is looking at a7ternative forms of financing to get the best rate. The market is starting to come down, and she is looking at the possibility of conventional financing, rather than industrial revenue bonds. Ms. Nybo stated she is looking at the industrial revenue 6onds and trying to firm up a commitment on that from the legal aspect. She is also taking steps to look at the conventional market. The market seems to be trending down a little, and she would like some time to look at it. She is asking for an extension of 60-90 days. Mr. Soardman stated Mr. Ted Burandt is in the audience. Mr. Burandt is the owner of this property, and he is interested in selling the property. At this point in time, the HRA has not commited to buy the property because they do not have a formal commitment on financing. He stated one of his suggestions has been that the HRA go ahead and get an appraisal on the property, negotiate a value with Mr. Burandt, and set up an option arrangemeni on the property for option to p�rchase. The HRA would be protected on that option price by Ms. Nybo. Within that period of time as set up on the option, if Ms. Nybo does not pick up the financing that is needed, she has two alternatives: (1) either fulfilling the option on the property and buying the property herself; or, (2) losing the option. Mr. Boardman stated it was his understanding that this would be acceptable to Mr. Burandt. Mr. Burandt stated that was acceptable as long as they can get something worked out. He stated he is getting tired of getting dragged along. He can emphasize his position on his side, but he could also understa�3d Ms. Nybo's position, but Ms. Nybo's side doesn't cost money and his does. He stated that if they can get this worked out within 30 days, and then Ms. Nybo has a 60-day option, he wouid have no problem with that. 8ut, he would want to have the option worked out within those 30 days. He did not want it to go any langer than that. MOTION BY MR, PRIEDITIS� SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRIE� TO RUTXORIZE PHE EXECUTSVE DIRECTOR TD GET AN RPPRAISRL ON MR. BURANDT'S PROPERTY. UPON R VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� VICE-CHRIRPERSON HOUCK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETIMG, MARCH 11, 7982 PAGE 16 _ Mr. Boardman stated he would also like the HRA to extend the right of development for Ms. Nybo to the HRA's regular meeting on April 8th. MOSION BY MS. SVENDSEN� SECONDED BY MR, PRIEIDITS� TD EXTEND A 30-DAY RIGHT OF DEVEIAPMENT FOR MS, NYBO�TO THE NRA'S REGULAR MEETING ON APRIL 8� 1982, UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON HOUCK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNAN�MOUSLY. III. NORTH AREA PROJECT ELO En�ineering Proposal Mr. Benson stated he and Mr. Sackrison were at the Feb, 17 HRA meeting with this proposal. Mr. Owczarzak has a purchase agreement on a 6.9 acre lot on the corner of 8)st and Main St. Mr, Owczarzak's company is currently located on Rancher's Road and has approx. 26,000 sq. ft. of industrial. He is proposing to build a 70,000 + sq, ft, manufacturing plant on the new site employing up to 85 people. Mr. Benson stated they looked at quite a few sites in Fridley and kept encountering soil problems. They are now approaching the HRA for some assistance for ELO in soil correction so Mr. Owczarzak can build the new facility. Mr. Owczarzak is at the meeting to ans�er any questions the HRA may have. Mr. Benson stated that since the last meeting, they have been able to take a much closer look at the soil borings, and they now feel fairly comfortable with a cost of $174,100 for just soil correction. That figure does not include the normal excavation. Mr. Soardman stated he has ta7ked to the bond people and the situation is that with the construction of ELO Engineering, they wou7d be ab7e to seil a bond issue of $200,OQ0, The problem with that is if they sell a 6ond issue to do the soiT correction, because of the lag time between time of sale until the property is paying fuli taxes, they have a capitalized interest cost of $60,000. That leaves the City with $140,OOD of usable money for the project. At this time, they could tell Mr. Owczarzak that the City has up to $]40,OD0 for soil correction. He thought Mr, Owczarzak is looking for some commitment from the HRA that the NRA wi11 commit "x" amount of dollars for soil correction so he can enter into contract documents for the purchase of the property. After the HRA gives Mr. Owczarzak that assurance, then as part of the tax increment district, the City would assist him in soil correction work. During the period of time before construction, Mr. Boardman stated he would like to Took into seeing if there was some way the City could do the soil correction by assessment. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETI�G MARCH 11, 1982 PAGE 17 MOTION BY MR. PRIEDSTI$� SECONDED BY MS. SVENASEN, TO APPROVE TNE .._ PROPOSAL BY ELD ENGINEERING AND THAT THE CITY WILL HELP WITH SOIL CORRECTION COSTS UP TO $140�000� PROVIDED THE DETAILS ARE WORKED _ OUT SRTISFRCTORILY TO BOTH PARTIES, UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON HOUCK DECLARED THE MOTIDN CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY. IV. FINANCE A. Check Register MOTION BY MR. PRAIRIS� SECONDED BY MS. SVENDSEN� TO RPPHOVE THE CHECK REGISTER, UPON A VOICE VOTE, RLL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON HOUCK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, � B. Financial Report MOTIDN BY MR. PRAIRIE� SECONDED BY MS. SVSNDSEN� TO APPROVE THE FSNRNCIAL REPORT. UPON A VDICE VOTE� RLL VOTING RYE� VICE-CHASRPERSON HOUCX DECLARED THE MOTION CRRRIED UNANIMDUSLY. ADJOURNMENT: MOTSON BY MR, PRAIRIE� SECONDED BY M5. SVENDSEN, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON R VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTSNG AYE� VICE-CHATRPERSON HOUCK DE'CLARED THE MARCH I1� 1982� HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING AR70URNED AT 11:30 P.M. RESPECTFULLY�MITTED, LY � E SABQ l�� RECORDING SECRETARY NAME Orrin Ericson Paul Pink Scott L. Ericson Thomas R. Quosius Jim Peterson Bob Levy Pat Hallisey C. H. Nolmen Duane C. Nelson James Vassar, Pres Laura Manske Mark Haggerty James Benson E. R; Owczarzak Jim Sackrison Cheryl Nybo Ted Burandt Dick Larsen Ken Barthe] Dean Doyscher Mar7in Nutchison J. M. Suh Jerome Hertel Bob Zeller Darrell Greedy HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETIf�G MARCH 11, 1982 ADDRESS 6600 France Ave, So., Edina 430 Oak Grove 6600 France Ave, So., Edina 6600 France Ave. So., Edina 6600 france Ave. So., Edina 700 Pillsbury Center, Mpls. 7701 York Ave. So �� , Edina �� ChdSka, Mn. Roger.s, Mn. Fridley, Mn. Mpl s. Fridley, Mn. Bloomington, Mn. 1612 Berne Circle 6271 Riverview Terrace 15612 Hwy. 7, Minnetonka Rogers, Mn, Mankato, Mn. 3633 Elmo Rd., Hopkins 12 Island Rd., St. Paul 114 E. 7th St., Mpls. COMPANY American Redevelopers, Inc.l Paul Pink & Assoc. & American Redevelopers, II American Redevelopers, Inc. �� Attorney for Proj. #61 Corp Holmen Development Co. �� Vassar & Assoc., Inc. Barthel Companies Smith, Juster, Feikema Benson & Malkerson ELO Engineering, Inc. Jim Sackrison Construction Felling, Felling & Nybo Larsen/Rova Assoc., Inc. Barthel Construction Professional Planning & Development Barthel Construction Juran & Moody, Inc. M. A, Mortenson Co. Caldwell Bankers 4 A� ::: � �=,: r 5�P ;+$: G ��"� _�, : � ��, � � �� , � �`•�' z �.�:.,::...�:_ » � ��_ � �' .'' CiTY flF RRF�N:�EY crc�a.wnr�c.nw �! .�^�" "�;� F�� e ' .r°'. o-",-, a; -�.z, �y M� �: � � � � ,, r¢cirma ' , . �4R1€GH 16, 1�382 ; :. . , �E�; � ��rar�a ta�'�e�.tbe, t�larch :16, i982, Envi"rn�ta] Quality Commission a�"s�sx; a� :7:4� �#�•�: �tt�: Richar�4 �va�m1�+, don Erickson. May�arcl.Nielsun �n�:: -�ruce i��ersun. �,ircia Selraaf , , "_ �t, Bil,t. q�iptt� RSSOCi�te PaEin►ter �` �a�ie.�tcalf. S,U.R.T. ` ; E�i��#i�WtY ;1�5. 1982� €MY�RONMENTAE- QE1,�.IF1' C0HFIISSION MIMUiES: .,, , r E�..��s 38�'�D SY.]MR. NTS"L6�N� �6;J9�PRUV� T�8 FBBRUARY Zfi� 198Z,, '7�f,'; �'�i�`�'''C��65"�'Ql�i 1V.A`Nf%TSS AS'AR2Z''�?t'�.: . "6' 1�e A7+� [FG?$'SNC A1'$r #�1alIRPER30NN &4+AA!.A$; 3.7�CLARSD �'S� NOT.a()N C)}RR,LED � �t„ �tf1,ID 4�$T� k�}AGEM�H7 ANO.R�CYCi,It�. �t�t� �t�at MBjrDr'-Nee did:;proClai� Aprfl ;1&24:as "Recycling in Fridtey �, t�, tiebl�Y�t�,r ttriags MerA pragress#�g in getti.ng t6e word out ��!�� s�tat�e! thRre w�i11>be art. articis in kFie cit,� RPwslette�^ abo�t the rp=� stniing t�� theaSQR7 Recyc]fng C�nter wi�i be open.all week-- �: ,�y ,ttir�gh, £r�da�r,. and- frp� 9�.m. - 2 p:m. " on Saturday. He i�is3ion reember� �ay want to #e7�,in seaxcbing for groups or organi- �^k-at t�►e recyct#ng ce�iter duri�g tt�a��-Week. He stated he has told . '`fi#�a� �;i,t� stdfif is aua.ilable for help fn��yping, maiiing► and telephorting. �t,�tL�S� 3,#iey r►f3l al�o bQ;,utiliz4ng cahle.TY, the Fridtey Sun� and t#+e r3�.1b4r��. sIIaied. the ComnissiQn rt�bers wo�id be wi'il ing: to work at ihe rec�rcting :#�v�#t►g, , t ; .� � , EPIr[i N'�{1E 1��`� C�ISSi t�EETING 't�C.�d 15 : 1982 PAG6 2 Mr. Ue��an stated �he Ci is rrow addin� retycling oil tanks tb the SORT faciltity, and there #s the �tenti�`, to expand ilfie co�ost on that ssme srte. �lr, ff�eb�on stateA, `ne ac'�t�ity fiar the RecyCli�g �leek could be #ct arrenge a field e t� tt~i��s) for ihe s��€tol- €�kii'#+dr�r� to see the reGyel�pp� center. i�s.' Wetcaif stated'�s#�e t�u3d bs happy to go ttr the SL11fl0i5 durl►rg thi.s week and ta'#k to the scl�o��; chi7ct�n about recyciing. As Chaicperson tif 50RT� she thought it:aioufid be app►*uDp�^iate �!�r h�t* to wriie.l�'�ters to the sehool princip$is, encouraginq °them to scheduie �t teur ,�ti tfre �^esycling cepier. : Si�¢,was sure t.i� other raembers of $URT rvoyld be t�ppy #A t�llce turns exp7aiusit�g the ce�nter to t�+g chi}dren, 5he thought ietters ict;ci�iC ��ga�izations asking for hetp at the�reeycli�g center siiould cane fr�aa 't1�e Cit�: Ms. Mettatf st�ttd:axhe� flelci trips tMat.wreuld be interesting aroutd he to a landfil� and tn l�arn �e'aao�st what is has�pening with methape g�s dn Ar�ka County. Mr, tlehton state4#.;he �tolt,l�#' cor+tact Bob HutC#ris�n, Director of` EnGiranmental Services at Anoka Gourtt�y and talk to �►im abo�tt that. M5. Mettalf staked-that �� tHe Cormnission's F�b. l6th meetinq, $ruce Peterson had sugges£�cl that tMe �t�ssion rr�mmbers -5pssnsor- a field trip t,+p the recyclin9 C�nt�r #crr the ci�9c orc��€izdtions and the qenerai public. She Stated ma�ybe the ' l�t�r i'�n th� City t�°�e �'iG4c organizaiians askir�y for ite1p at the recyciittg �, center cot�ld incltide att #�tr�itd,�ion fow the organizations to Visi:t the recycling center on'5aturd�, 11pr~�7 Y�� Maybe representativ�s fran the variflus industries that use #he re�#�ct�d �;t��iai$ and their:t�uler couid be there ta speak. t�s: iieb'l�ut'stated. he sa�r-a; p�b7em witfi staff #i[� aerd Goumission tiz� to Lry to tine up these repres�ntittives. Maybe it'�td -be better �G� h�ve this kind trf`activfity later in tt� y�ar wfien the we�iher is 6t�ter, and ihere is rt�are time far ptar�tiing su�h>an a��#Ly. Ne feit they sho�Sd stick to one goat that is � �tainabi��and tPrat is=��y.�rtg°ttr��gei at l�ast one ff�l��trip ar�enged��fi�ough�tk�e I � sshtrot sy��em. � , � � � � #r, Svanda agreed that )ater in the sumner raight be � better time for this kYnd of field trfy. ' Mr. 5var+da sta�d �#+at� ir► s�ry, the SflRT.Recyciir►g Center �rtilt be open » during tl�e eveni�g; M�rday - Friday, fronr 5-7 p;�. and`froro 9 a.m. - 2 p.m. on � ` �aturday durin� �.fie w� e�# April 18-24. �- Letters �ri�1 6� going to the eiviC � : grtstips asking f�'voitt��ers to:heip with ^ti� ree;yek#ng-center on thc�se>week r��ts. Ms. Me'��alf w&73=be writing a 1ett�r to`th� sct�oois. I�^. Oeblon state�# they°_r�uld;try to get tfiose t�t�ers out the riext daty. � i b1s. Metcal# stated>she ?woti}d sti11 iike to have the ietier ta �hg civic groups inc7ude an invit,at3on �t� v.isft the recyc'ting center �n Sat„ �rril 24. She was &ure the rest E�� the 3�E�'#` grtrttp wauld support her' iti th#s. Witih the publicity tha : , :. ., ;. - .. :�� t , - . ., � , : �� r �.:. � � � �+'"3 � v� s -�'* "" 4�e-s, �?� ^�+ T ' �' ;�t"+ r' > e�'^�� v� �i& v S��,s � 5 i t'a s 6£�` y� �. � ' � � y � � � � e ,`, � � ,� 1� � ii' U N ,A ��` IM6 3=" PA�E 3 ' L" .� ,��, � .,.: f ,:£ � < �J ,g = ;��t�, #�� b� guod to try tb %�r, �he adults, so it isn't ��d.1�t.�hil�X'-C�'s..aclt9vities. �h� �w�u�'k� tke3ctime any-ideas the � d��t�t io irs�es# �Fs� civic�:grroup&;��ing aad visiting �he � - .. ;,: �: . �tl>.it.w�Jltt.be a good oPA�rtuniEy f��.t#�e people to hring in thelr �d��4�) aml--to ctm�b�ne Ehe.recyctal,►��.w�h a�itt1� eduaatiat�. �- � #�� p�t:+��aic cluEis asul grocip5 ha+�e 't� d� a comnunity service �: i;� 4�r t� �et their goai fo�^ ti3e �±ear. He stated Ms. Mestcelf �;$��►� �bat i.f tAey are too�Cing�ftir a ca�tmun�ty service pro3ect, ;:a� �l idsa: . , ��,i� ��`�� ., �b}on��ated^��s g�an�.involv�5 $�d0 �� ca�n.be used for a eitizen-�� tfer��e. Tfie ct►nferet►�e m€rst b��ail�t! at exp.l�ining dr �#�� ?�` splz+�ng- the- waste maa��ne�t ��{�blet�. He� stated tM� - ��n #�e-us� fo� Qrinting cus�ts, s�n€f Lime, rentat.af equi�ment, �•gc�sernl�entat: speakers. �b�ts� s�ated'the#�e wer2 three cP�fexer►�s�,; att� has heen granted so .; pi��r�r�ces r�1n for funding. He state�! at] they have tc do is i�.�^a�3asai,inc]ude th� pr�oYlgm itrrgitdc#��s5, and;snbmit it to ��on C�ntrol Agency #ar furt�ing. . Y�d�►da :sL'ate��ybe tt�is eoutd 1� use4.as, �i wa� pf getting the �arbage �,�ttr.xepr�ese�it�tives;�f the haul.ers �t� Fr4dJe,� together in a �aeeting, : Wit�+ �A' t�obers And . Ct�ni 55ion �ers. ��4t�:�#,a't��l.that �puld be the: prob]em.:�h�y want tQ; address--hew r,�=,s�rg8�9,ze;�,t� haul,ers to be �pore e#'fici�nt and.facititate : ��i�;��era[t�tk<� hau�s' efiort$. �` ;1"�Y�trt':agr'� ��, ►wruld be a g�od p�ay �o approach it. ��s#��t�� e�#.�ng cot�lA�fnclude��,�e haulers, 2-3 repres�ptat{ves ��s�ries th�at recycle, SOR7,'the.Gomm��sion, and a represent�tive �inv� �C�itpt�t- �A . taak - $bout resAUrce r��ry. �tt�#fi s��'!� �#fit- t��#t t�e,t�ste.•A]er�-Grap_t i#em cau]d bs �abled : t��r��uflt��.,iher�.v►�s,a deffinite d�di��e. ':SM� would real7y iike h� �:-Ci�rriss��r� fiav� a� meeting-w�tM �he hauiers as soan as possible' n� .�t tt�� s.#,��rd oa recyc1 ing. .. �� a�ge�d �hat i� bpuld pro�ably be be�ter ia focus on ane group. s�� 1 I � j I ! � �t�Y3RC�HtdE�!'}'AL UAt�'fi€ Gflf�kfiS�ti� MEETIN& 'i�GN`lfi 1982 1�AGE 4 , ,; � Mr. L4�b��<s'Cated �ha� �fare tfie C�Sssiott .meets wit�t '�e hau7ers, `�hey sho�t� exp7i�re the ordinance:t�t refuse h�u}ing, �le �u1d like to See the Gb�anaissicn go tfirdugh it a►tt! {�ssib}y make recoamae►Mations #or . v � eF�anges.� : , � , ; _ Mr� Svanda eske�f`�`� U�1�an to senei��ies'srf the� crdin��ce i� the � C�ission��me»dse�'r�.f�1^;�`eview beffl�e e nPatt meeiing; �t tHe n�att meeting. � t�y can dfscuss,�he orzl9nance �nd th�►►r� sc#�d�►�p �a meeii�tg with��ttre ;. haulers.. �1'F�,�•�'aaflt,'to scheduie a-spec'�7 meet3ng� ratMer than fiaving the haulers att� tMe��-egular May mesting, � 3. ENYII�A€#�I�. xSSU�&�'� �tFFECT THE CT3Y., e. North Cr�s�stown=��i� �� ,�� ;: Mr. Uebio�:st�t�`he,h�d'no infora�tfpn tn re�or�. The ftem was continued, b. Anoka Ciwr�t� Ai�prt Mr�. debto� stat� he t�d rto inforrq�ti�sn ta report, ihe itenr was continued. ° 4. �� OTHER:�Blt�FNE,S�'z � �� . ± , a. Citv nf t�^Int�ea��1s t��ianated Nef��#+borhoed Aeeyctir�o P�ogr�n M�r, Svamd�;� Mand�i-�aut.:�opies of ar��artic1?e in ihe Ma�"cM �10, 1982, Mp7s. T%ibune-t�gardti�y -the "�CitY of Minr�a{r�7Ss f�e��hbtrl^bood liecysling; Progrnm, �: ife 5tated;the at�t#c]e basfca7iy tA#ked about Lhe mon�y ihe City could s�ve for �he r�'ident;. as fdr as h�-mucFi �tiE� could b� generat�d from rscyclfng. The:drt#c}� stated th&i, "If tt� p7an is.eacpanded td the ; entire c�ty., i5,�tlfl�tttns��of recyc��h'�es wor� �3�"4,4i?0 �t today'5 prixes �� cou7d be,�3ac3z+dg�! b,� i985, assumi� a 65 psrcent par�tei�pation rate.° � Mr. 5van�a.s'tat�d h� �quickly pro-r�ted that far the Cfty af Fr�dley and � ea� up �rii� a3s�ut �2�,D00. He tk�o�ght thi� was s�ti►inq Lhey could discuss t�ith t.�e hayltrs. � Mr. Sva»d� sta�d ht Woutd like to kMOw h�r the G1ty of Mp]s. got tn � 'the pu41�t �f �niZ�€�g ;this prog�da�, � Mr. Ertc�s�lrt 5 t3ested that somectne fra� �he�Ci#y of tdpis., who has Eo9rdtna�ed th� reeyc]ing progra� attericf the meeting the Cormrrission > is gait�g-io fiaVe witl� the haulers. 7his'�3eY�son woutd have the expertise and knaw�edge �1 �rzs�r questionssfr�lan #+� #�ul��s �rrd °the Commission. '- Mr: Svar�la s��d they-should invlte tt�1s �rson-to;the next Camnissiort' ; meetfitrg �a ih�:'�a�ission me�bers' can get.►r�t�ee �ta�ts and be more `; know'#�a�r1e ~��ar�:.'tfie a�eeting :a►it#�.the �av�ers. #A . .�� _ �"'�`= — � — _ �=s : �: �:, e r i; �rri `��= � ' �`a�� _' �, <�' v��''k��..., .-�*.��'�ra- �� + ��.� -�: �, . ��;�� 4 r%' +�°r,", � _ �" -� , �F � �,n :, 'F ,�',. t��r ��. �„�"- '� 9 F�s �r � a � -p.,,' ✓ aa •. °';s '�., z- .- �..�s'� � fiY : N� I� � �<� �. a a}� x, � � . _ '� � .�e# i��.� � �it.Y Fia��l . �l��i��z.fr�m Bi71; Qeb}an ) , , , x. , .: - a �lt� .��t� #1� Publ i c iivrks �i�?�fi�� upparts the conc�pt t�!'�t� �?E?�x �Y�lin$ i�q �City Hdll, I��:`[� ��t'.d mattRr of �t��qg a��at^ion itt Gity Hatll =-wh�re t�e "peper can be stored ' ..t��i��tt�y:lu�ds� 3nto trusks: . ; � .> , �,��GAPa'=+��EtB77 8Y lBi. 8'R.TE'iCSfkY� 417":�i'OURN T�8 M58T#HG. D'?ON h :�i,Y��'A►G ,�Y$� L"XA.1'RPER3EMIT Su�i1!DAi 3�G`FrnR�D. 47t& 1dARCN 16r 298?� i�`�'1`S'.�+$.e�'A1 XSb"1'SNG AR70t7RM8D'�AT 20t00 F.N. �.�tibatftts�l, Rc�taraa.yr� ; � �3 r' � � � , �,,-. 3E�' ? �c � � i, a�k � � ; � � . i za �{ I r�_ : �„ ,. : . ' � . � __ . . ,�� . . � .� . . . � . � � � .4 � � � !I , � . .�: . . � . , . . . ` ._,. . . , . - . ' ,� � � " . . 1 � � - � .. . . '3` �1 i . � . . . � . � ., i�, � ��i �F y a t, � -h � �' � � � �., � r -�- . � , c.-:., � ,.i: . . � .. , u': �� CITY OF FRIDLEY ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 23, 1982 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Saba called the March 23, 1982, Energy Comnission meeting to order at 7:36 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Dean Saba, Bill Wharton, Gi1es McConville Members Absent Others Present Don Wall, Jerry Cichosz Bill Deblon, Associate Planner APPROVAL OF MARCH 3, 1982, ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. WHARTON, SECONDED BY MR. McCONVILLE, TO APPROVE THE MRRCN 3, 2982, ENERGY COMMISSZON MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON-A VOICB VOTE� ALL VOTSNG AYE� CHASRPERSON SRBA DECLARED THE MOTION CARR2ED UNRNIMOUSLY. 1. CNAPTER 220 REUISION: Mr. Debton stated the Commission members had a copy of the revised Chapter 220, City Council approved the second reading at their meeting on March 22. He stated the recommendations made by the Energy Comoission to include the state energy standards are included under Section 220,07, Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards. Mr. Wharton stated that under the "Preamble" on page 1, the words, "energy inefficient" have been inserted, He asked what is meant by "energy inefficient" structures. Mr. Deblon stated that by saying the words,"energy inefficient structures", they are putting the public on notice that there are now energy standards included in the ordinance. Mr. Deblon stated the Econanic Development Planning & Energy Agency (formerly the Minnesota Energy Agency) has offered to come out and train Steve Olson, the Environmental Officer, and himself on how to enforce the energy regulations. Mr. Deblon stated the Cwnmission shouid continue to review the ordinance and, if there are any problems, they can always recomnend amendments. The Commission may want to play a role in where the City prioritizes their enforcement efforts. ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 23, 1482 PAGE 2 MOTION BY MR. McCONVSLLE, SECONDED BY MR. WHARTON, TO COMMEND CZTY STAFF ON A JOB WELL DONE IN INCORPORATING SECTION 220.07 INTO CHAPTER 220� "RESSDENTIAL R&NTAL PROPERTY AND COIJLI�MINSUM AREA MAINT&NANCE CODE". UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAS12P8RSON SABA DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. . 2. CDNTINUED: ENERGY ACCOUNTING SYSTEM Mr. Deblon stated the Commission had received copies of the energy bills for the Civic Center and the Fire Dept, for the last 38 months, 1979 - Feb, 1982. The Commissioners reviewed the billings. Mr. Saba stated this was a good start on an energy accounting system, as they now have some figures down on paper. He asked Mr. Deblon to get the energy figures for the Bottle Shop also. Mr. Saba stated the Economic Development Planning & Fnergy Agency is offering a software package for community energy accounting. He asked Mr. Deblon to check into this and report back at the next meeting. 3. ENERGY FINANCIN6: Mr. Deblon stated two ways of financing energy improvements that are of issue right now are bonding and loan financing. Mr. Deblon stated he had included in the agenda packet some information on a home improvement loan program through the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. Mr, Saba stated that the problem with this program is it applies to �extremel _ lo�w in�come people. The �ross value of a person's assets must be no grea-- ter tTian � Mr. Deblon stated these )oans are availab]e right now through Marquette State Bank. He stated if the City wants to facilitate this, they would first find out which lending institutions are perticipating and which ones cannot participate and then encourage people to look into the program. Mr. Deblon stated another type of financing that might be available is the NSP/ Minnegasco utility loans. The prerequisite for qualification is an energy audit. Mr. Saba stated he thought the NSP/Minnegasco utility loans were probably the most workabie. He wished NSP and Minnegasco had enlarged their area beyond Minneapolis and St. Paul. But, he stated they shou]d continue to look into all the possibilities. ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 23, 1982 PAGE 3 Mr. Deblon stated he would be interested in finding out how Marquette State Bank is doing with their home improvement loans. He would check into this and report back to the Commission. If the Caronission decides it is a good program, they can encourage other banks to get involved in the program. Mr. Saba stated this item should be continued at the next meeting. 4. STOP SIGN POLICY: At the last meeting, Mr. McConville had volunteered to talk to a state senator about what a City can do to change speed limits from 30 m.p.h, to 25 m.p.h, in certain areas,and report back to the Commission. Mr. McConville stated he had been unable to contact the senator, but would da sa and report back to the Commission. Mr. Saba stated that with today's smaller vehicles, it seems there are some areas that could be set aside in a city for reduced speed limits, especially around schools and parks. Mr. Deblon presented a map showing the locations of all existing stop signs in the City of Fridley. Mr. Saba stated tfiis item should be contined at the next meeting. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. WHAIZTON, SECONDED BY MR. McCONVILLE, TO ADJOURN THE MEETZNG. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIRG AYE� CHAIRPERSON SABA DECLARED THE MARCX 23� 2982� ENERGY COMMISSYON MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:52 P.M. Respectfutly sub itted, �y�a a Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING MARCH 24, 1982 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Commers called the March 24, 1982, Housing & Redeveiopment Authority meeting to order at 5:31 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Larry Commers, Russe' Nouck, Carolyn Svendsen, Elmars Prieditis Members Absent: Duane Prairie Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner Corinne Prindle, 6870 Washington St. N.E. Dorothy Smith, 362 - 64th Ave. N.E.' Len Schollen, 6381 University Ave. N.E. Judy Schollen, 6381 University Ave. N.E. Curtis Radebaugh, 7449 Concerto N.E. Dick Harris, 6200 Riverview Terrace Al Singer, 378 - 64th Ave. N.E. Mark Haggerty, 6441 University Ave. N.E. Stan Kowalski APPROVAL OF MARCH 11, 1982, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. PRIEDITIS� SECONDED BY MR. HOUCK� TO POSTPONE THE APPROVAL OF THE MARCH II� 1982� HOUSING & REDEVEIAPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES UNTIL THE REGULAR MEETING ON RPRIL 8� 1982. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAZRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNRNIMOUSLY. I. CENTER CITY PROJECT A. Phase II - Office Building Mr. Boardman stated that at the March llth meeting, the HRA received a letter from Mark Haggerty dated March 10, 1982, that laid out some points on the development of an office building. The way the office building was laid out when they were working with Columbia Park Clinic was with 64th Ave, going straight through. They were going to do some kind of development with an office building on the south side of 64th Ave. When they actually started working with an office development to tie a package together with the Clinic, they found it would be easier for both the office and the Clinic to pull the office away from the Clinic a little and separate them with a road system. i HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, MARCH 24, 1982 PAGE 2 Mr. Boardman stated the Clinic people are very concerned about not having controlled parking. This way all the parking is controlled parking and it is the Clinic's parking. Parking for the office building will be leased from City Hall. At the present time, they have 50 parking stalls in the City Hall space. Since the Court is moving out of City Hall, they do not feel there is going to be a parking problem. They will have adequate parking with 166 spaces for the office and City Hall. Mr. Boardman stated that in Mr. Haggerty's letter, he talked about purchasing the land under the building and leasing the parkin9 spaces necessary for that building. It was set up with payments of $1,000/month for leasing parking spaces and that would carry over 31 years. After 31 years, they had the option of buying the parking for $1. Mr. Boardman stated that was not acceptable to the City, and after a �egotiation session, they are now looking at $800/month for leasing parking spaces and after the 31 years, there was an acquisition cost of $100,000 on the parking land. Mr. Boardman stated that as far as the building, Mr. Haggerty is looking at $2/sq. ft. for the property under the building (20,000 sq. ft.) for a total purchase price of $40,000. They will delay any payment on that purchase price for the first four years. After that, they will pay it off in 10 years at 11 3/4% interest rate. Mr. Boardman stated these terms are agreeable with City Staff at this time, and they are now coming to the HRA with these terms. However, there are some other conditions, and Mr. Qureshi, the City Manager, has been working on this thing. He stated the NRA would not be owners of the property, they would not want to own the parking; and, therefore, the lease arrange- ment would not come back to the HRA. The question of whether the HRA is going to purchase the land from the City and the HRA would get the lease monies, or whether the lease monies would go directly to the City and the City wou7d retain control of the property has not yet been worked out in detail in the lease agreements, Mr. Boardman stated that at this point, they have done the contract docu- ment work, they have given all of it to Mark Haggerty to look over, and maybe Mr. Haggerty could give the HRA more information from that point. Mr. Haggerty stated they did not really want to finish the contract docu- ments until they knew for sure where they were with the HRA. They have no problems with the overall substance of the documents. It is just a matter of "fine tuning" what is going to be done. Once they know it is a viable project in terms of numbers, they can have those documents completed and back to City Staff within a few days. Mr. Comners asked if the HRA was in any position to take any action at this meeting without that information. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETIMG, MARCH 24, 1982 PAGE 3 Mr, Boardman stated that if the conditions of (1) the payment of the property over the ten year period at 11 3/4% and (2) the lease of the parking are acceptable conditions to the HRA, he thought Staff was in the position where they can move ahead with the documenis, complete the documents, and bring them back to the HRA. He stated he has looked at the cash flow on the whole thing and that is ]ooking fairly good. Mr. Boardman handed out a copy of a"Cash Flow Analysis - Phase II". He stated Dick Ehlers, Ehlers & Associates, has done a quick run on the bonding. They have a bonding capacity with the Clinic and the office building of $l.l million. One thing that is very clear is that if the Clinic doesn't go, the office will not go. So, they are trying to put both projects together about the same time. Mr, Commers stated that, knowing the office is contingent upon the Clinic, he did not know how they could approve the office building without knowing the final situation with the Clinic. Mr. Boardman stated they expect a letter from Juran & Moody on financing for the Clinic next week, and Mr. Haggerty is expecting a letter on his financing commitment. These are just commitment letters for the financing. Mr. Boardman stated he would like to get approval from the HRA to start negotiations for purchase based on those commitment letters. He stated there are several things they are working on. The Clinic will not be able to sell bonds until they have actual control of the property, so Staff would like to move as quickly as possible but still stay within the limits acceptable to the Clinic peop7e and the office people. Mr. Boardman stated that with the situation on the Clinic, they may have to negotiate with Gus Doty as far as the purchase of a portion of his property. He wou7d like to have the authorization from the HRA to get appraisals on Mr. Doty's property. He stated he has talked with Mr. �oty, and Mr. Doty is a willing seller, but Mr. Boardman stated he needs a price with which to start negotiations. The other properties they need to acquire are the properties to the east of the Fourth Right-of-Way, and they have gotten appraisals on all of those properties. Mr. Boardman stated that when the commitment letters come in, he wants the authority to go ahead and start negotiating purchase prices. Otherwise, he would have to wait until the April 8th HRA meeting. By that meeting, he would like to be able to come back with the negotiated prices they have worked on. Mr. Commers stated he did not see a problem with whether they lease the land from the City or whether they acquire the land from the City, it is just that they need to get the final numbers in some kind of format so they can review those numbers to see how it will work and how the overall project will work. The cash flow helps, but they still need to see it in terms of overall project, bond retirement, etc. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, MARCH 24 1982 PAGE 4 Mr. Boardman stated he will not know that until he gets the actual runs on the bond retirement from Eh7ers & Associates, They are looking at 15-year bonds. Again, they are looking at all of the construction work, the street relocation, the plaza, landscaping, as a street improvement bond. That will be done as an assessment project. When they get into the contract documents, they will have to negotiate with the property owners on how they are going to break up those assessments. Mr. Commers asked Mr. Boar�nan to put a proposal together with that information and get it to the HRA for their April 8th meeting. Mr. Naggerty stated that at the last HRA meeting, he had stated he hoped to go to market the first week in April, but now they are not going to be able to do that. He stated he could live with the April 8th date, but at that time, he would need a pretty firm commitment from the HRA in order to proceed any further. Mr. Commers stated the office building is still dependent upon what the Clinic does, If the HRA is not in a position to have a commitment from the Clinic, he did not see how they could make a commitment to Mr. Haggerty. Mr. Haggerty stated maybe the best thing for him to do in the meantime is to assist the Columbia Park Properties in making their decision, Mr. Haggerty stated one thing he has discussed with Mr. Boardman is that if they would ever want to expand their office building, they would like to have the option to buy, sooner than 30 years, a portion of land that would be in the form of a lot, and actually have their northerly boundary be a"zero" lot line, so they could expand without having to get some kind of mortgage lease from the bond holders. That was the only major consideration; otherwise, everything else was the same as in his first proposal. Mr. Commers asked what Staff's position was on this option. Mr. Boardman stated the City is not ready to give that kind of option. They can look at it at some point in time, but the City would like the option to relocate then in another area. Mr. Haggerty stated the only thing he would ask in that regard is that when the City goes to plat this area, they be cognizant of the fact that maybe there sh0uld just be a lot there or something that would save every- one if the City did decide the office building could expand. That would be a feasible alternative to them, because then they would know the expansion was sti71 a possibility. Mr. Boardman stated the City could consider that possibiiity in the platting. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, MARCH 24, 1982 PAGE 5 Mr. Boardman stated he had some problems with the HRA in a long-term lease arrangement, because this is being looked at as a 31-year lease agreement. He is not sure where the HRA is going to be after 31 years, 6ecause the District is completed in 25 years. Ne stated they are going to have to work with the City on this. Mr. Commers asked Mr. Boardman if he and the City Manager would have something put together in a plan to present to the HRA at their Apri1 8th meeting so the HRA can make that decision. Mr. Boardman stated he would. Mr. Haggerty stated that, other than the option he had mentioned earlier, he would go on that basis and plug in all the recommended changes into the contract documents and get those back to Mr. Boardman the first part of the next week, along with their commitmeni letter. Mr. Prieditis stated he was in agreement with the conditions as outlined by Mr. Boardman earlier, and he thought it seemed reasonable to make provisions for the future by separating a portion of the property in the plat for possible future expansion. Mr. Commers asked what Staff would have available to the HRA at their April 8th meeting. Mr. Boardman stated he planned to have the following: (1) commitment letters from the Clinic and Mr, Haggerty (2) contract documents �3 a more detailed breakdown on costs (if possible) 4; a general understanding from the City's point of view on how the lease arrangements are going to work and what costs are going to be involved to the HRA on land acquisition or land purchase. Mr. Commers stated they should also have a written summary of what Mr. Boardman is proposing as far as assessments. Mr. Boardman stated Mr. & Mrs. Smith (362 - 64th Ave.) are very concerned about the timing. He stated he has assured Mr. Smith that the City will be working with them and will do everything they can to make the relocation easier for them. There are relocation monies available, and the City will pay any moving expenses. He stated he has discussed with Mr. Smith that at some point in time, the City will have a real estate person try to find a property that is acceptable to them for repurchase. Mr. Commers stated that if the HRA approves the Clinic's proposal on April 8th, what is the timing going to be for these people? HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING MARCH 24 1982 PAGE 6 Mr. Boardman stated that as far as taking the actual title to the properties, they are looking at taking title as soon as possible. That doesn't mean the people have to move at that time. As far as timing, they are looking at at least 90 days, Mr. Commers asked Mr. Boardman to review the letter from Mr. A1 Singer to Mr. Boardman dated 3/19/82. Mr. Boardman stated he has talked to'Mr. Singer, and Mr. Singer wili accept $58,90D, as long as there is $15,000 in relocation costs. He stated they now want to get a multiple listing from a real estate company and check to see if $15,000 is an acceptable re7ocation. �r. Singer is entitled to relocation with an acquisition. Mr. Commers stated they needed a legal opinion to see if they can do that without an actual relocation taking place. He asked Mr. Boardman to have the City Attorney give the HRA a letter stating the re)ocation is, in fact, something that is permissible to meet Mr. Singer's request that the relocation monies be given directly to him. Mr. Len Schollen, 6381 University Ave. N.E„ stated that if this project ever gets off the ground and construction is started, he is concerned about the impacf this construction is going to have on the access to their business. Their business is a convenience business. and people are going to go where it is more convenient, Their business is going to suffer. Mr. Commers stated that Mr. Boardman should negotiate with Mr. Scho7len and maybe his buiiding can be taken down sooner. B. Phase II - Clinic - Re-evaluation of Site Layout due to Office Plan Mr, Boardman stated he had a meeting Monday with Columbia Park Clinic and Juran & Moody. They are now reworking the contract documents. Before, the City was selling the Clinic the property up to 64th Ave „ and the City was retaining the right for buy-back on the office building, etc. Now, 64th Ave. has been changed and they are reworking the Phase II documents. They have gotten the rewrites of the documents to Coiumbia Park Clinic's attorney, the Clinic people are going to get their recommendations/ modifications/changes back to the City, and then the City's legal counsel will review it, also. C. Phase I- Purchase of Northwestern Bell Building Mr. Boardman stated that Mr. Wyeth has said he will come down from $275,000 to $270,000. Now it was up to the kRA as to whether they want to purchase the building at $270,000. He stated Mr. Wyeth is at the point where he is ready to sign a 5 year lease with two 5-year options with Northwestern Sell at $16,000 yr. If the HRA decides they want to HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, MARCH 24 1982 PAGE 7 acquire the building, he thought it would be a good idea and the HRA would not lose money on the project. They could acquire the building and lease it to Northwestern Bell. Mr. Ha99erty stated it is a very favorable lease to Northwestern Bell in terms of dollars and cents and also location-wise, and they would like to stay here as long as they can. Mr. Prieditis stated they had voted against proceeding with the acquisition at the last meeting, because it was a situation where there was no room for negotiations and they felt the $275,OOO,compared to the City's appraisal of $250,OOO,was too high. He stated there has now been an indication that there was some attempt to negotiate. Mr. Comners asked what this does to their overall plan, because they would be tying up $270,000. Mr. Boardman stated that in looking at the cash flows and the project on the other side of University, they had a flexibility of about $500,000 between the two projects, and that is a very conservative figure. He stated he did not feel at this time that the $270,000 would be a major deficit to the HRA. MOTION BY MR. PRIEDITIS� SECONDED BY MR. HDUCK, SD PROCEED WITH THE ACQUISITION OF THE NORTHWESTERN BELL BUILDZNG PROPERTY. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. D. Phase III - Letters from Develoaers on HRA Action - Discussion on SelectiQn Mr. Boardman stated that at the last meeting, the NRA agreed they would like each developer who had made a presentation to present some type of concept drawing in a proposal to the HRA. He stated both American Redevelopers, Inc., and Holmen Development Co. declined to put any money into design proposals at this time. They wished to be considered on the merits of their past performances and their presentations at the meeting, Mr. Boardman stated he had only received a schematic concept from Barthel Construction. Mr. Boardman showed the HRA the schematic concept. He stated Barthel is proposing 98,000 sq. ft. of retail space, including the hardware building. Mr. Boardman stated he would urge the HRA to make their decision on the development teams' presentations and their merits and to go with the development team they felt most comfortable with. Mr. Comners asked what S�aff's recommendation was for a developer. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING MARCH 24, 1982 PAGE 8 Mr. Boardman stated he has worked with all the deve]opers. He stated he feit most comfortable with 8arthel Construction with Ken Barthel as the developer and with Dean Doyscher as the coordinator. He also felt quite comfortable with the rest of the development team. Mr. Boardman stated he felt A1 Holmen was a very honest and forthright man. Mr. Holmen doesn't do anything he doesn't say he is going to do. If something cannot be done, he wil] say so. In Mr. Boardman's short association with Mr. Holmen, he felt he was very honest and could probably do the job, but Mr. Boardman still felt most comfortable with Barthel Construction, Mr, Prieditis stated that at the last meeting, his choice was between Mr, Ericson of American Redevelopers and Barthel Construction. He stated he now felt that Barthel may be the most likely development team to put together a package and proceed instead of dragging this out any longer, He also liked the idea of local people being involved in the limited partnership, who are interested and have been working on it. He felt that was very positive. Ne stated he also felt very comfortable with the design Barthel had presented. MOTION BY MR. HOUCK� SECONDED BY hII2. PRIEDITIS� TO GRANT PRELIMINARY RIGHT I OF DEVELOPMENT TO BARTHEL CONSTRUCTION� WZTH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY HAVE 30 DRYS IN WHICH TO COME ZN WSTH SITE DRAWINGS AND SIX MONTHS TO PUT . THE PRCKRGE TOGETHER. �-' Mr. Pried4tis stated he would like to see something said about the quality of workmanship that is going to go into the project. Mr, Commers stated that was a good suggestion, and if this rrbtion passes, Barthel Construction should be notified that the HRA would like them to indicate something about the quality that would go into the project. Mr. Boardman stated they should probably give the right of development for the site designs to be presented to the HRA at their regular May meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHASRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. II. APPRAISAL FOR TED BURANDT - CHERYL NYBO PRdJECT: Mr. Boardman stated the appraisal on Mr, Burandt's property came in at around $46,�00. He stated he has not yet contacted Mr. Burandt, because there is a substantial difference between the appraisal and what Mr. Burandt thinks his property is worth. Mr. Burandt wants $65,000. He stated he has talked to Ms. Nybo and asked her to get her financing committed before the_ April Sth meeting so they can start acquisition. They will plan to move ahead with acquisition at the April HRA meeting. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMEN7 AU7HORITY MEETING, MARCH 24, 1982 PAGE 9 ADJOURNMENT: Chairperson Commers declared the March 24, 1982, 5pecial Housing & Redevelopment Authority meeting adjourned at 7:10 p.m. Respectfully su mitted, y Saba Recording Secretary I-� � ��.�-- ��,�.�.:-. .��---� �x�z"``° `� �'`ti`e �� i y� '� �/"`� ��"�c----- �__-- ��P�.�-�,�E�. �; �-'�`� 1 �'1--�"-� l -` `,� ��Z`" �✓�.' �� `"?�,�-%t- - �� d C kM.0 �l, �i;�lS�.�ii�z � �. .Sir 6� � L ��' UL �� ._.�1��/� �� ,�� C/�.�`� _ � r�r�,f.�n. �i �4�u��. 1�.� - - � 8' �f — � � � -t.�.�� , �, , ��v-G6 Ce��F_ �-�o? lF � �de /L�� -5�% Gc,t/ � — �/yu �i "e� C�,�. �'�dn f�d 7 3;, vw;�p�ZZ,-�y a�x_ss. �o�_ ar�c�f:��u�e ��l , �3�s� l/,viv��s�r,� tiE �� i1� � �,.,-z ��- � yy I GG�2�. � �>. � /��G/ �-�/a.ti.r�wm� � //Oo 3 %'�,,,�,�.��.,c.�1 � , r i i ! I � ! 1 _. CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 7, 1982 CALL TO ORDER: Chairwoman Schnabel called the April 7, ]982, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:31 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present Members Absent Ms. Schnabel, Mr. Oquist, Ms. Gabel, Mr. Kondrick, Ms, van Dan, Mr. Svanda, Mr. Saba �� Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner Bob Schroer, 490 Rice Creek Blvd, Mark Haggerty, 6441 University Ave. N.E. Henry Sandbulte, 287 - 120th Ave. N.E. Leo VanderBroek, 11861 Flintwood Ellsworth & Florence Hinz, 384 - 66th Ave. N.E. Patricia Hardel, 332 - 64th Ave. N.E. Herb Bacon, 159 Logan Parkway Bill Sledz, 321 University Ave. S.E. D. C. Savelkoul, 6315 Univeristy Ave. N.E. Marietta Anderson, 17003 Terrace Rd. APPROVAL OF MARCH 24, 1982, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: MOTION BY MR. OQUIST� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TQ APPROVE THE MARCH 24� 1982� PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNRBEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMQU9LY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING RE UEST, ZOA #82-02, ROBERT SCHROER: Rezone ract B, C, and D, Registered Lan Survey No. 9, from C- S local shopping areas) to C-2S (general shopping areas) to make zoning consistent with use, the same being 6520, 6530, and 6536 East River Road N.E. MOTION BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. SRBA� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ZOA 1{82-02 BY ROBERT SCNROER. UPON A VOICE VOTE� RLL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABBL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:34 PM. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 7, 1982 PAGE 2 Mr. Boardman stated the property is located on East River Road and Mississippi St, That is the area where there is a gas station, the #1 Health Club, and a vacant property ta the north. The present zoning is C-1S, Mr. Boardman stated when the #1 Health Club came in, it was Staff's determination that a health club was allowed in a C-1S zone. After the bui7ding was up and operating, it came to the City's attention that there was another operation going on, other than the health club, and that operation was a massage. He stated a massage parlour is not allowed in a C-1S zone. Mr. Boardman stated since that time, the City Council has passed an ordinance called a"Sauna License Ordinance" which restricts a massage parlour in a G-1S zone and allows it only in a C-2S zone, At this time, Mr, Schroer is making an application for a rezoning of that particular area to C-2S, Mr. Boardman stated there are three properties involved--Tract B, Tract C, and Tract D. Tract B is the vacant property, 7ract C is the #1 kealth Club, and Tract D is the gas station. Tract D is also a non-conforming use because a gas station is not allowed in a C-1S zone, although it has been in that operation for quite some time. When the gas station was built, it was an a7lowed use, but with the changes in the code, it has been grandfathered in and exists as a 7ega1 non-conforming use, Mr. Boardman stated Mr. Schroer owns Tract B and Tract C, and the owner of Tract D (gas stationj is in agreement to the C-2S zoning which is being proposed at this time. Staff feels if they are going to rezone two of the properties, they should rezone all three at one time to make the area consistent. Ms. Gabe] asked what would happen to the massage parlour operation if this rezoning request was denied. Mr. Boardman stated they would not be able to operate a massage parlour in that location. A health club operation would be a7lowed, but not a massage parlour. He stated the City allowed a health club with the idea it was going to be a health club, but the use was changed after the building was purchased by contract for deed from Mr. Schroer and renovated. Ms. Schnabel asked Mr. Schroer if he had a written agreement from the owner of Tract D(gas station) that the owner is in agreement with this rezoning request. Mr. Schroer stated the owner of Tract D is in agreement with the rezoning, but he did not have a letter of agreement. Ms. Schnabel stated she felt that from a legal standpoint as far as the City is concerned, they should have that proof of agreement. If the Planning Comnission approves this rezoning request, one of the stipulations should be that a letter be on file. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 7, 1982 PAGE 3 Mr. Bill Sledz, 321 University Ave, S.E., stated he currently has a purchase agree- ment on Tract B. He stated he is buying Tract B for the purpose of putting in a garage or just to enhance and protect the property they own behind it (the 144- apartment complex - 6540 East River Road). They would also have purchased Tract C if they had moved a little faster, but they learned a health club was going in there, and a health club was fine with them. He stated it was his understanding that the gas station would not be affected if the zoning did not change because of the grandfather clause. Mr. Sledz stated that if this operation is going to exist in this location, they would like to see it return to a health club and not a massage parlour. They do have a purchase agreement on Tract B that is binding and can be exercised, and for all practical purposes, they are just waiting for title. If the owners of the health club bought the building from Mr. Schroer and it was Mr. Schroer's understanding that it was going to be a health club, he felt those people should abide by that and not change their operation. He stated he has an investment in his property, and if Tract C ever became available, he would be interested in purchasing it. Ms. Schnabel stated she had a problem in that she could not recall where the City has rezoned a property to make it consistent with the use of the property, usually the property has to be consistent with the zoning. Mr. Boardman stated it has been done in situations where they are making non- conforming uses into conforming uses. If nothing else, he would recorironend the gas station be rezoned to C-2S because the gas station is allowed in C-2S. He stated he also has a problem with a rezoning in a situation like this where a property was developed under a C-1S zone for a specific use and then that use, whether right or wrong, has changed. Ne did not feel the Planning Co�nission was necessari]y obligated to rezone just because a use is there that was created illegally. Mr. Schroer stated the City had determined the zoning was right for a health club, but when the operation was changed to a massage parlour, there was no zoning for a massage parlour, and there was no one in the City who knew they needed a new license for a massage parlour. The point he wanted to make was that the operation did not have to fit into a C-1S or a C-25 zone at that time, because no zoning existed for it. Mr. Boardman stated this is an interesting situation. The way the code was set up, there was no zone that said a health club was allowed or a massage parlour was allowed. When the health club came in on this site, Staff made the determination that a health club was a local business and, therefore, would be al7owed in a C-7S zone. A massage parlour is not necessarily a local business. The codes were very vague and left it to the discretion of City Staff to decide what was allowed or what was not allowed. At that point in time, Staff did allow a health club. He thought that if a massage parlour had been proposed on this si:te, there would have been some discretion as to the type of zoning where it would be allowed. At that time, a massage parlour would not have been allowed in a loca7 business zone. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 7, 1982 PAGE 4 Mr. Boardman stated the three properties shou7d shopping (C-1S). real issue is whether the Planning Commission felt these be zoned to genersl shopping (C-2S) or remain as loca] MOTION BY MS. GABEL� 5ECONDED BY MR. OQUIST� SO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ZOA #82-02 BY ROBERT SCHROER. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE,CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED RS 7:56 P.M, Ms. Gabel stated the fact was that Staff had made the determination to allow a health club, regardless of whether there was any zoning at that time that allowed a massage par7our. What they have now is after the fact when they are 6eing asked to change the zoning to meet the need when it is normally done tfie other way around. She stated she had a real problem in doing that. She stated she was not interested in changing the zoning of the gas station as there isn't rea7ly a need for it. It can exist there as a legal non-conforming use. If the owner of that property wants to have an official rezoning, that person can make the request. She felt that in some ways, Staff was mislead in seeing this as a health club and it turned out differently, and she did not see that as a reason to change the zoning. Mr. Saba stated he agreed with Ms. Gabel. Ms. van Dan stated she also agreed with Ms. Gabe7. There was also the fact that neither che owners of the health club or the gas station were present at this meeting to speak their wishes, and she did not think the P7anning Commission should recommend any changes unless they were present. MOTION BY MR. SABA� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL THE DENIAL OF REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #82-02� BY ROBERT SCHROER TO REZONE TRACT B� C, RND D� REGISTERED LAND SURVEY N0. Z9, FROM C—IS (LOCAL SHOPPING AREAS) TO C-2S .(GENERAL SHOPPING AREASJ TO MAKE ZONING CONSISTENT WITH USE� THE SAME BEING 6520, 6530� AND 65,�5 EAST RIVER ROAD N,E. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHRIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � Ms. Schnabel stated .the minutes would go to the City Council on April 19th and when they set the public hear>ng on tnis request everyone ��!ouid be notified again. 2. PUBLIE HEARING: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #82-02, NOBLE RSERY, INC.: 5'o use a 0 y area o Menar s par �ng oT t for the sa e'T' o�"nurs'ery stock, and Christmas trees, in season, per Section 205.101, 3, N, of the Fridley City Code, to be located on Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision No. 94, the same being 5357 Centra] Avenue N.E. MOTION BY eLII2. SABA� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ZOA �82-02 BY NOBLE NURSERY� INC. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 7, 1982 PAGE 5 UFON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:59 P.M.� Mr. Boardman stated this is an application for a specia] use permit for a nursery/ Christmas tree lot located in Menards' parking lot. In 1978, a permit was issued to Menards for a garden-type use in the parking lot for a one year period of time. At that time, the City Council suggested that if there were ever any more requests for this type of use, it was not to be located in the parking lot. He thought discussions at that time with Menards was that any use shou]d be a7ong the building itself as it would be a more appropriate place than in the parking lot area. Mr. Kondrick asked why the City Council felt it was not a good idea to put any future garden areas in the parking lot. Mr. Boardman stated they have always tried not to increase these temporary types of uses that are not well maintained, that are put up temporarily and are not a year-around faci7ity. By putting it in the parking 7ot, there is no possi6ility of any landscaping or screening to make it more attractive, other than the plants that are brought in and sold. Mr, Mark Haggerty stated he is the attorney representing Noble Nursery, Inc. He stated Mr. Henry Sandbulte and Mr. Leo VanderBroek, principles of Noble Nursery, Inc, are also in the audience. He stated Noble Nursery's primary location is just north of Fridley in Blaine on Highway 65, and that is where they would maintain most of their inventory. Mr. Haggerty stated he would like to give the Comnission a little background on how this came about. When Noble Nursery, Inc., entered into the lease agreement with a71 the Menards in the Twin Cities area, they were told there would not be any problems. There was money paid for that arrangement. He stated they did not realize there were any problems or any restrictions until after the lease arrange- ment was signed. They also did not know about the previous one year special use permit. Mr. Haggerty stated he has talked to Mr. Boardman and the neighbors who live behind Menards. He stated he hoped to reach a compromise that would be workable for everyone. Qne of the objections is the traffic flow and the size of the nursery area, and that is why they have designated a 50' x 75' area. Noble Nursery, Inc., is intending to put a nice wooden fence around the area, and there will be a very small portable wooden A-frame shelter in case of bad weather. They will try to make the drea as attractive as possible, He stated if the Commission members wtished to drive by Noble Nursery in Blaine, they would find it is a very attractive operation. They would keep the bulk of their stock at the main nursery, They would primarily have display trees and for people who wanted to make big orders, they would take de7ivery at their Blaine operation. That was pari of the compromise when they discovered there might be a problem. The operation would only run from whenever the City Council approved the request until the end of June and from Dec. 1 to Dec. 25. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. APRIL 7, 1982 PAGE 6 Mr. Haggerty stated Mr. Boardman had mentioned the problems with temporary uses. He stated the point thdt should be looked at in a situation like this is that the on7y time they can sel7 this type of nursery stock is early in the year, and presuma6ly the people who are buying the nursery stock 7ive within the City of Fridley and are beautifying the City of Fridley in their yards. He felt there was a residual benefit to the City of Fridley and to the citizens of Fridley by having this conveniently located in Menards'parking lot. Mr. Haggerty stated that, as far as location, they would prefer to have the location they have proposed (southwest corner of the parking lot), but they are willing to work with any stipulations the Planning Commission and City Council might make, They will keep the area as small as possible and will clean up the area after they are done. He stated Menards has indicated they do not want them located next to the fenced area, because Menards feels there could be more of a traffic flow problem in that area. Mr. Leo VanderBroek, 11861 Flintwood Ave., stated it would be a very nice, attrac- tive operation. There will actua7ly be two structures, the A-frame she7ter, and a greenhouse-type structure to protect the bedding plants in case of freezing weather. MOTION BY hII2, OQUIST� SECONDED BY MS, GABEL� 20 CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SP�N82-02� BY NOBLE NURSERY� INC. UPON A VOICE VOTE� RLL VOSING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNRBEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED RT 8:28 P.M. . Mr. Oquist stated he felt the best location for the garden area was in the proposed area in terms of both traffic flow and visual affects. MOTION BY MR. OQUIST� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO RECOMMEND TO CISY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST� SP #82-02� BY NOBLE NURSERY� INC.� TO USE A 50' BY 75' AREA OF MENARDS' PARKINC LOT FOR THE SALE OF NURSERY STOCK�.AND CHRISTMAS TREES� IN SEASON� PER SECTION 205.101� 3� N� OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE� TO BE LOCATED ON LOT 9, AUDITOR'S SUBDZVISION NO. 94� THE SAME BEING 535.2 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E. - UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCXNRBEL DECLARED THE MOTION CAI2RIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated SP #82-02 would go to City Council on April 19. 3. PUBLIC ZON G AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 205, FRIDLEY M0220N BY MS. GABSL� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:35 P.M. - PLANNIN6 COMMISSION MEETING, APRI4 7 1982 PAGE 7 Mr. Boardman stated there are three Housing & Redevelopment Authority redevelop- ment districts in the City--the Center City Redevelopment District, the Moore Lake Redevelopment District, and the North Area Redevelopment District. What the City is attempting to do is establish a district similar to other special districts that have been established in the City that will allow the development of these redevelopment districts by plan. Any development within a special district or any property that is zoned an S-2 district would require a plan to be presented to the'Planning Commission and City Council. The pnrpose of this special zoning district is to: 1, Allow mixed use development within special redevelopment districts, Right now there is no zone, other than a PUD (planned unit development) zone,which requires 20 acres for development. There is no special zone that allows mixed use. 2. Allow the maximum flexibility in the promotion of the district. Redevelopment districts are very difficult to develop and sometimes there are a lot of special conditions in order to promote and get a development, 3. Allow development by plan which is acceptable and in the best interest of the City and overall district and development plan. Mr. Boardman stated the process by which they would go through approval of an S District is similar to the process they are following tonight. They would look at what property they would want to rezone as an S-District, and then that property would be submitted on a rezoning process. The Planning Commission and City Council would have the opportunity to review any zoning issue and the property owners within 350 ft. would be notified, After that rezoning, the Planning Commission and City Council would be able to respond on particular plan and plan elements in that zone, Mr. Boardman stated that included in the plan would be all site plans,showing the lacation of buildings, off-street parking, street and utility locations, access to and from the project, grading plans, storm water plans, and landscape plans. These would come to the Planning Commission and City Council, along with a written staff review and a report from the HRA on any special conditions or considerations. Mr. Boardman stated they are referring to this as the "redevelopment district ordinance" that would a71ow them to establish with special consideration in those districts that are presently redevelopment zones or those districts that have the potential of becoming future redeve7opment districts. Mr. Oquist stated the ordinance "a7lows for the mixed use deve7opment within special redevelopment districts". How do they control that mixed use? Are they going to put any limitations on the kinds of things they are going to allow in an S-2 District? Mr, Boardman sCated the city attorney has reviewed this ordinance, and he felt they were pretty well covered. The ordinance states that the uses permitted are "those uses which are acceptable to the overall redevelopment plan and specific development plans as approved by the City". It also states that it excludes uses PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 7 1982 PAGE 8 unacceptable to the overall development plan as determined by the City. So, it does give the Planning Corrnnission and City Council full control on the types of uses that will be allowed within that plan. It is a planned unit deve]opment and is not a zoning issue. They are rezoning by plan because they want the flexi- bility that is not built into the normal zoning code. That flexibility is a mixed use type of development. Mr. Saba asked what happens five years from now when someone goes in and buys a building and then wants to convert that building for a different use. Would the City go through the approval process at that level, because it is already zoned a special district? Mr. Oquist stated there needs to be some boundaries on the ordinance under "Uses Permitted". Mr. Boardman stated that was a very good point, and there should be some change in the language. He stated he would work out some new wording. Mr. Oquist stated he fe7t the ordinance should be recommended for approval, with the wording change, because it does give the City the capability of classifying areas. Mr. George Meissner, 373 Mississippi St. N.E., stated he was also concerned about the section on "uses permitted", which states: "Those uses which are acceptable to the overall redevelopment plan and specific development plans as approved by the City," He stated the statement does seem very vague. He did not know how the City was ever going to determine what uses were acceptable or were not acceptab]e, if they were ever put to a real test on what would or wou7d not be permitted. He stated if Staff can get that clarified adequately, he would be satisfied. Mr. Boardman stated that what is meant in that statement is that,in the approval of the plan, if they approve a shopping center, that is a shopping center use and not each individual use within the building itself. Then each of the individual uses within the shopping center must comply with the shapping center use. He stated he will be adding some wording to the effect that, "each individual use must comply with the overall use (such as a shopping center)" Mr. Meissner stated the concept sounds good as presented; he just hoped it works out as well as it sounds. MOTION BY MR. SABA� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HBARING ON THE PROPOSED �. � � - � UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL�DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 9;06 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 7, 1982 PAGE 9 MOTION BY MR. OQUIST� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL THE APPROVAL OF CONSIDERATSON OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 205, FRIDLEY ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE FRIDLEY�CITY CODE, BY ADDTNG 5ECTSON 205.23 ENTITLED, "S-2 SPECIAL ZONING DISTRICT"� WITX THE STIPULRTION THAT STAFF CLARIFY THE.LANGUAGE WITH REGARD TO THE USES OF VARIOUS STRUCTURES WITHIN THE REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated this would go to City Council on April 19. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING �RE .U..E_ST, ZOA #82-03, CITY OF FRIDLEY: Rezone �loc�-l', �, ��, a�cn �5, Ree's A3dition to �r^'i�fey aP rT<, and-Parcets 5000 and 5050, from a mixture of R-1 (single family dwelling areas), C-1 (local business areas), C-2 (general business areas�, M-1 (light industria7 areas), and P(public facilities areas), to 5-2 (Specia7 Zoning District), genera7ly located between University Avenue N.E, and 5th Street, and from Mississippi Street N.E., South to 63rd Avenue N.E. (but excluding Block 1, Auditor's Subdivision No. 59 - Parcels 100 and 105 - Frid7ey Bank property). MOTION BY MS. VAN DAN� SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARINC ON ZOA #82-03 BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. UPON R VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTSNG AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HfiARING OPEN AT 9:09 P.M. Mr. Boardman stated that since 7978, they have had a Center City Redevelopment District, which includes Holly Center, the property across from Ho17y Center, 10,000 Auto Parts, all the way down to 61st Ave. With these properties, it is the City's intent to develop a Center City cohesive development. They developed a six-stage development program within the district. This went through public hearings in 1978, and the district was approved and set up by the City Council. Mr. Boardman stated that since 1978, they have worked on severa7 developments, They tried to pull in an office building north of City Hal] which did not work. They tried a retail development across from Holly Center which did not work. One reason is that the financing has been very difficult. At this point, they are putting a proposal together south of City Ha71 for a 28,000 sq, ft, medical clinic facility with a possible expansion by 1986 of an additional 28,000 sq, ft., and also a 30,000 sq, ft. office building. Mr. Boardman stated it is their intent with this development to narrow 64th Ave. from 40 ft. to 26 ft. for circulation, do some landscaping, and create a public plaza developrnent. That public plaza development with the landscaping will be consistent throughout the area and will start the development of their theme throughout the entire Center City area. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 7, 1982 PAGE 10 Mr. Boardman stated that at this point in time, the HRA is going to be hTring a landscape architect by competition. That ]andscape architect will do the detailed design for the area with conceptual designs and tie it through the whole district. In order to be consistent with the area, they are looking at rezoning this area, because it currently consists of 5-6 zones. The City is requesting the rezoning of this area to S-2 to al7ow them the flexibility to develop this concept, When actual detailed plans are available, they will be submitted to the Planning Canmission and City Council for approval, Mr. Boardman stated that in the next 3-4 weeks, they will also be hiring a traffic designer who will be ]ooking at the whole traffic design. Mr. Boardman stated the Fridley State Bank has requested they not be included in the S-2 District. Mr. Don Savelkoul, 6315 University Ave. N.E., stated he is the attorney for Fridley State Bank and the owner of the property. When they heard of this rezoning request, they met with Mr. Boardman and Mr. Qureshi, the City Manager. The Board then met, and they advised the City that they did not want to be a part of the S-2 District. He stated they have no opposition to the district or to the plan, but at this particular point, they do not want in any way to be included in the district. They have been in their location since 1962. They have 12,000 depositors and 50 employees. He stated they are in a very competitive industry. Over the past 20 years they have had to expand twice--they have had to revamp the parking lot and their drive-in facilities, and probably will have to do it again. He stated their traffic pattern requires every inch of ground they have. They would have complete confusion if they had to integrate the bank property with the parking lot for the clinic. Their responsibility as a banking institution is to operate effectively and competitively. They want to handle their own traffic the way they want to handle it. They wi71 be happy to meet with the City and Mr. Boardman on any common problems, but they would very much appreciate it if the Planning Commission would exclude the bank property from this rezoning request. Mr. Haggerty stated he agreed with Mr. Savelkoul about the bank property being excluded. Mr. Haggerty stated he represented all the private owners of the building north of City Hall, and he is also the developer of the office building, He stated that from their perspective, the type of zoning being proposed and which is used in a number of other cities for redevelopment purposes is really the only way to go. He stated it makes sense to exclude the bank property, because it is not reaily going to be redeveloped as such, while all the other land included is going to be redeveloped. He stated the new zoning could save a lot of time and possibly some legal problems in the development of, not only the office building, but also the clinic. MOTION BY MR. SABA� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRSCK� TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ZOA $82-03 BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 20:00 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 7, 1982 PAGE 17 MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF REZONING REQUEST� ZOA N82-03� CiTY OF FRIDLEY� TO REZONE BLOCKS 1� 2� 3, 4, AND 5, REE�S ADDITION TO FRIDLEY PARK, AND PARCELS 5000 AND 5050, FROM A MIXTURE OF R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AREAS), C-1 (IACAL BUSINESS AREAS), C-2 (GENERAL BUSINESS AREAS)� M-I (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AREAS), AND P(PUBLIC FACILITIES AREAS) TO S-2 (SPECIAL ZONING DISTRICT)� GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN UNIVERISTY AVENUE N,E. AND STH STREET� AND FROM MISSISSIPPI STREET N.E.� SOUTH TO 63RD AVENUE N.E.� BUT TO EXCLUDE BLOCK 1� AUDITOR'S SUBDIVI520N NO. 59 (PARCELS 100 AND SOS) FRIDLEY BANK PROPERTY. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated ZOA #82-03 would go to City Council on April 19. 5. RECEIVE MARCH 71, 7982, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. SABA� 5ECONDED BY hIlZ. KONDRICK, TO RECEIVE THE MARCH 11� I982� HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES. UPON R VOICE VOSE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED� UNANIMOUSLY. 6. RECEIVE MARCH 16. 1982, ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTZON BY hII2, SVANDA� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO RECEIVE THE MARCH I6� 1982� ENVIRONMENTRL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES. Mr. Svanda stated they are working on publicizing the Fridley Recycling Week, April 18-24. Ms. Schnabel suggested that Mr. Svanda may want to get this information out through any existing neighborhood groups. Mr. Saba also suggested that Mr. Svanda contact the Minneapolis Star & Tribune to see if a full-page ad could be placed in the paper showing the locations of all the recycling centers throughout the Twin Cities area. UPON A VOICE VOTE� RLL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TNE MOTZON CARRIED UNRNIMOUSLY. 7. RECEIVE MARCH 23, 1982, ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. SABA� SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA� TO RECEIVE THE MARCH 23� 5982� ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCNNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNRNIMOUSLY. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 7, 1982 PAGE 12 8. RECEIVE MARCH 24, 1982, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. VAN DAN� SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST� TO RECEIVE THE MARCH 24� I982� HOUSING & REDEVLLOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHASRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLIlRED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY hII2. SABA� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO AA70URN SHE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNRBEL DECLARED THE APRIL 7� 2982� 1'LANNING COMMIS5ION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 50:30 P.M. Respectfully subiitted, y aba Recording Secretary