Loading...
PL 04/21/1982 - 6774PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING GALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: City of Fridley AGENDA WEDNESDAY, APRIL 21, 1982 APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: APRIL 7, 1982 1 2. 3 4. 7:30 P.M PUBLIC HEARING: SPECIAL USE PEHMli> �N 3FUZ-us, �sT rtn�� anivn SYSTEM, VERN WILCOX:_ To allow a 3Q'x4Q' site in Menard's parking lot to be used for an automatic teller machine in an enclosed building, Per Section 205.101, 3,I, of the Fridley City Code, on part of Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision No. 94, tfie same being 5351 Central Avenue N.E. PUBLIC HEARING: SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SF#82-04, METRONIC 6ARY WEBER: Per Section 205.131, 3,A, 7), of the Fridley City Code> to allow the installation of a 158' radio communications antenna, on Parcel 6600, located in the South Half of Section 12, the same being 6972 Central Avenue N.E. RECEIVE NUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: APRIL 1, 1982 orrcrvr uniicTtir. a RFnFVFi nPMFNT At1THORI7Y MINUTES: APRIL ' 5. RECEIUE APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: APRIL 13, 1982 6. OTHER BUSINESS: ADJOURNMENT: PAGES 1 - 12 13 - 17 18 - 25 SALMON WHITE YELLOW PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a Publi,� Hearing of the Planning Co�nission of the City of fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, April 21> 198� in the Council Chamber at 7:30 P.M, for the purpose of: Consideration of a Special Use Permit, - SP �82-03, First Bank System, by Vern Wiicox, to allow a 30 ft. by 40 ft. site to be used for an automatic teller machine in an enclosed building, per - Section 205.101, 3, I, of the fridley City Code, on part of Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision No. 94, the same being 5351 Central Avenue N.E. (Menard's) Any and a11 persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. Publish: April 7, 1982 Apri1 14, 1982 VIRGINIA SCHNABEL CHAIRWOMAN PLANNING COMMISSION 13 �/.y]�p CITY DF FRi�LEY,� � � SUBJECT VO 6437 UNNERSITY AVE. NE . � FRI�LGY. MN. 6:i43� (6'{27 67'1-�`'O ADDRESS 14 SPECIAL t1SE PERMI7 sa a�a -U 3 DATE PLANNING C014t9ISSIQN: P,H. DATE APPROVED DISAPPROVED DATE NO CI7Y COUNCIL: P.H. Rf_Q'D �ATE NO CITY COl1NCIL: APPROUED DISAPPROVED DATE NO STIPU4ATIONS: NAME �'<t�Z. BA �_t� 13�,� p,,,� _ FEE �'T.1�� � RECEIPT NO_ ���� STREET LOCATION Of PROPERTY 53s/ C�ry7a.na � vc �L/o �� Lo LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY A u a, roit s S uis a r V 5�69/ � 9�/ - << c,c 'y g' . — PRESENT ZOf41NG CLASSIFICATIONE'-„?-S EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY1?�n�, a�%�F�,c�.vY.er• ACREAGE OF FROPERTY �°�X yo' DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROP05ED TYPE DF USE AP�D IMPROVEMENT �uror+;•,or�.= T �L€n �7��f/�ni� I/L �.zi��-<'SEo Has the present applicant previously sought to rezone, p7at, obtain a lot split or variance or special use permit on the subject site or part of it? +,yes �no. What was requested and when? _ The undersigned understands that: (a) A ltst of all residents and owners of property within 30U feet must be attached to this application. (b) This application must be signed by all owners of the property, or an explanation given why this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any defect in the proceedings resulting fram the failure to list the names and addresses of all residents and property.o�a�ers of property in question, belongs to the undersigned. A sketch of proposed property and structure must be drawn and attached, shovting the foi]otving: 1. North direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on the lot. 3. Dimensions of property, proposed structure, and front and side setbacks. 4. Street names. 5, Location and use of adjacent existing buildings (within 300 fee1;). 7he undersigned hereby declares that all tt�e facts and representations stated in this application are true and cerrect. QATE --3�i J/sx � SIGI4ATURE ����.s- �� --��1PPLICAN77� �- . � F.,esr ,8isr�irc S:�sr�r� - ADDRESS i s�oo �i,�s��a.v.� /�=-a=� �4sr TEL[PHON[ NO_ 37t- 7 i�'�, f4AILING LIST SP # 82-03 First Bank System Menard's Parking Lot Menards 5351 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55421 Kroger Company 5247 Highway #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn 5542T Ground Round 5255 Central Avenue N.E Fridley, Mn 55421 A & L �4anagement Company c/o Alexander A. Levitan 2�51 Long Lake Road New Brighton, Mn 55112 Yun H. & Soon Jha Lee 1268 Skywood Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55421 Mr. & Mrs. Carl Heggestad 1258 Skywood Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55421 Mary L. Matthews 1259 Skywood Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55421 Sheldon Mortonson 2289 85th Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, Mn 55432 DA6 Investments, Inc. 10301 University Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, Mn 55434 Mr. & Mrs. Jerold Lehman 5211 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55421 Mr. & Mrs. Joseph Voltinson 5215 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley> tfi 55421 Mr. & Mrs. Robert Wachsmuth 5241 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55421 Planning Commission �� G " �y City Council 15 ��/ � Vern Wilcox First Bank System 1400 First Bank Place East Minneapolis, Mn 55402 , �� ��� /;��- U James R. Grover (612) 920-1889 Gene E. Hickey & Assoc. Inc. Architects 6950 France Avenue South Edina, Mn 55435 n N I Loca� i or► � ...o. � £ � o�� . _ � e� � Y s ! ../ �1� � . «. ■I � .- '�n�ti'�-� �� � 'M � i u�0[� C6 KMZMM O0. M�E�MLIt [ � 16 SP 1182-03 First Bank System - Menard's a.� �+.� w. IU�J� " � nr�� �� I 'F w ����.�� � i ��; �.� _:�_ ���v'�'� �..,—� - % ��^: a'� � _� �`���'�� N . � ».r� _� � ;,7, :� ��...�.i�� —,� r--�, ,_. ;;—� ;` t � 3 �n�� r.lr ; �_�: i���` �_ � �� " a �� � ����Gl`�� . ,�_�"'. ` �`�� t', =�,`CS :...e..�, _ ss ��� -r'��i} ��, COWMLL t i KIBMs STREET MA.P-C17Y OF FRIDLEY 0 �333 6,666 '"�� .-�'Ye,: :�:Di:+w�� .�. , N 7 C N > Q cC L .r C � U 53 rd Ave. N.E. p N Fir Bank System ��� _ _ �� 1 I I 11LI I D t '�v:.Y'iJhR.�:��wi +.w'�t��r.:i:�"�t`�J.m.:3F-.:�v:�..LU�� ' .: - n-�.-..:�..n r.aaev,e ZT.2stirMY+'e.ti53:?!—?ifNr •..Ue 18 PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given tfiat there will be a Publi,r Hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6A31 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, April 21, 1982 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 P.M, for the purpose of: Consideration of a request for a Special Use Permit, SP #82-04, Medtronic, by Gary Weber, to a11ow the installation of an 158 foot radio communications antenna, on Parcel . 6600, in the North Half of Section 12, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley> County of Anoka, Minnesota. Generally located at 6972 Central Avenue N. E. Any and a11 persons desiring to be heard shall be given an.opportunity at the above stated time and place. VIR6INIA SCHNABEL CHAIRWOMAN PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: April 7, 1982 April 14, 1982 F. . _.. . . .. .. . . ... .. . I� CtTY OF FAIOLEY, � -� 643'I UNlVEi7SITY AVE. NE� � FRI�L[Y. MN. S543E (612),57�-3450 �� SUBJECT �,,.v //�'i ��� SPECIAL USE PERMIT Sp �+�/ �b'�- DATE�_� PLANNING CQt�M1�1ISSI4N: P.H. DATE �/at/�Y APPROVED DISAPPROVfD DATE NO CITY COUNCIL: P.H. REQ'D DATE NO CITY COUNCIL: APPROVED_, DISAPPROVED_ DATE NO STIPULATIO'NS: Medtronic, Inc. FEE $200.00 RECEIP7 NO_�� STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTI' 6970 Central Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 -- ,�%�� � �p 5 %r � s.-es" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY See Attached Drawing !wG<'� �� �� PRESENT ZOtJING CLASSIFICATI'ON EXISTIN6 USE OF PROPERTY Light Manufacturinq ACREAGE OF PROPERTY DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROPOSED TYPE OF USE AND IMPROVEMENT ! � � Nas the present applicant previously sought to rezone, plat, o6tain a lot split or variance or special use permit on the subject site or part of it? __ S'es X no. What was requested and when? The undersigned understanris that: {al A list of all residents and owners of property wi+_hin 300 feet must be attached to this application. (b) This application must be signed by all owners of the property, or an explanation given why this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any defect in the proceedings resulting from the failure to list the names and addresses of all residents and property owners of property in question, belongs to the undersigned. A sketch of proposed property and structure must be drawn and attached, showing the foliowing: 1. North direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on the lot. 3, Dimensions of property, proposed structure, and front and side setbacks. 4. Street natnes. 5. Location and use of adjacent existin9 buildings (within 300 feet). The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. DA7E � Z � SI ADDRESS 6970 Central Avenue N.E. TELEPNONE NO '�'ricli-ey-�"; -PI[1 574-4705 � � ' �- "- -- -- — --- -- _: .. . _ - _ -�°^ MAILING 1IST SP #82-�4, Medtronic Antenna Medtronic Gary Weber 6970 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 John C. Luce W. M. Montgomerty & Assoc. 3618 Rainbow Drive Minnetonka, Mn 55343 Onan Corporation 1400 73rd Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Penzoil 7000 Highway #65 N.E. Fridley, �9n 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Richard Weispfenning 131D 69th Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Wade Norton 835 Columbia Blvd. Minneapolis, htn 55418 . D. W. Harstad Co., Inc. 7101 Highway #65 P�.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Robert Rosecrans 1163 Norton Avenue N.E. Fridley> Mn 55432 Jerry Sympson 1175 Norton Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Thaddeus F(yatt & Carol 1215 Norton Avenue N.E. fridley, Mn 55432 Harry Dettmann 2064 Hastings Avenue Newport, Mn 55055 Planning Commission 4/6/82 20 Ruth �. Norton 1251 Norton Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Robert Genin 10060 Jay Street N.W. Coon Rapids, Mn 55433 Mr. & Mrs. Frank Lachinski 75h1 Edgewood North Brooklyn Center, Mn 55428 Dowie Bouma - 16165 Bass Lake Road Maple Grove. Mn 55369 Lubratt Properties c!o Paul Lubratt 580 69th Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. Kenneth Kowalke 1152 Norton Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Charlotte Gray 1170 Norton Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mann Realty Building 7091 Highway #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Ellsworth Berkstrong 1200 Norton Avenue N.E. Fridley, P1n 55432 Cynthia 4�abe1 Tofte 1214 Norton Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 LeRoy Smith 949 44th Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, Mn 55421 Gurmeet or Daleet Gandhok Mr. & Mrs. Kurt Nordenstrom 2 Spring Farim Lane 1245 Norton Avenue N.E. North Oakes, Mn 55110 Fridley, Mn 55432 Susan K. Williams & Phillip D. Rostad 5568 West Danube Road N.E. Fridley, MN55432 zi �ailing List Page2 Metronic, SP #82-04 Angela Ponessa 1260 Norton Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Donovan or Sharry Elias 7390 Concerto Curve N.E. fridley, Mn 55432 S. K. and Savitri Pladireddi 11542 Gentilly Road Maple Grove, Mn 55369 SP#82-04 Medtronic Medtronic 0 March 2b, 1982 Mr. John G. Flora Director of Public Works City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Flora: Re: Special Use Permit Request—Building Code �I205 22 Metltmniq Inc. 3055 Old Highway Eight PO. Box 1453 Minneapolis, MN 55440 USA Telep�one: (672) 574-4000 Cable:Medtronic Telez:29-0598 This lettec, along with the attachment to it, form a request for a special use permit regarding the �se of our property at 6972 Central Avenue. Specifically, we request the permit to allow construction and use of a tower structure to support a two-way radio antenna for the employee plant safety and security departments. � Our two-way radio system is licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to operate at ultra high radio frequencies illHF), not microwave, and the structure requested herein is necessary to allow for communications between portable radios carried by our personnel inside all our Twin Cities plant facilities who must communicate back to our central operator at Rice Creek. The operator then summons police, fire or rescue/ ambulance services when necessary. The structure itself, shown on the attached drawing, is 140 feet in height and will have a pole-type antenna 18 feet long attached to the top of it, making the overall height above ground 158 feet high. This will be just slightly higher than the powerline transmission towers which are !00 yards to the north. The closest private property to the so�th of the proposed radio antenna tower (shown on the attached site plan), is some 2,000 feet away and would appear to be the home of Dr. J. H. Gilbertson at 6801 Channel Road. I am of the understanding that the filing fee for this permit is $200. Please find our check attached. I also understand that this matter can be scheduled for the planning commission meeting April 7, 1982. If you have any questiorrs, please call me at 574-4705. Sincerely, MEDTRONIC, INC. ��� �-.��� Gary We er Corporate Security Manager pjh Attachments _ � ._ _ __�____ __ � n N Loca�'ion � � . k : tl : � _ � ""` .:✓ „ �-- M r . � o.,._ , � � �niiti :_ � � l i x � i— � � � � _ �. l•^'.����. rt .... I Y 1 ' �`-- I �.+o.. en � 1 ��� - �iEiw �iM 06 � WtY0L1� _. t.; SP #82-04 Medtronic �� �..� w. �u��t � inr�i� ,,—�,s .o:� � 23 �� u.. .�-i�y,� `/�„ �� .. ... - �n�i�?���� ...m ��,�.�. � . «���. STREET MA.P-CtTY OF FRIDLEY p a333 6,666 ��2`"" . ; .._: . ARCHiTECTU��►L ALLIAC�C� SP #82-04 MEDTRONIC 24 a � � � - F+�. � '+ ` `. y�. i�` ,�, - B�' / , ' �•. • F . �p�HO � o � / -�, � ti .,••� •` h �, �.^ � � � � , �•.•� f , y , _� � , � � 1 , .. ... . —� . � i� , _ 'w, _ . , ��� � � / / . / / �y , � '/ o � - . � � � � � ...... ' • . ���� A �� � y��� , � � � �'� �� \ �_ � ` �" �OD��/ � . y�'w . =� �N V'� ,d:,,,r� F �'� `� ? �`� '� =�= _ == \�.. '�. , e�...�. +/sr'Tf 'y'. � .'� � � dy � �te t V � `� � � � � ��` � �' — \\� � � '' . '�yG t '�[ , _ � � �' � .\'�� ,� . �,/'9t h ��� � _ •. � �� 2 \ � � '.� �� ,� y;, 1 . � �. � 1. . � _ Y�� � �� � , ° � -., A � +e n n a — — , �� ���� � 4 �� �\ 4 �. kz_ • - � f w, -��� '���\`��°•� �juPpor'�lrlg ,r� � — ' � \��� \� \� .� ''� T t �'s \ 4a��� � ; I o W e r ,� � � � `�� .� j�° � , ...� � �� �: , ., ,� , � , � � , ��/ � - � � ' � � �; •� e t;i _: e�, < � 1 .t � � � ���a i� - ,' . cgi �, . % �- �\ �\ \ _�\ . , ..: ,_.4 .� � ... e.v' � / ' � \ �\\ \\�\�6 ... � ..... j f . �� � � .�.p - °� . .... d� � � �� � �� �4 � � � ..� . ' ;_..� ��� _ / ; // � , /, .. w • t•\�� \•�� ���\°�•^' • ... _��_ . _ j �.� . . � �` � ..,� �:.... — . % . e � � r�... '�_ � = e �` , . ..49 ._ . �o \ �' � \ � 4„ � ,.�: '' / �� /' j i j . !, . _ �.� ' . °6\ \\ �\ , ._\.. 1 \ \ ' I , � � � � -- -- � ----- ' — , 4--7-- -- . — --- r ,>,.,.d� ..« e_; z%f�o.o. io�wcESUee re � � � [cws (vwar,va. �-n) .. � wc[o�✓wetE � `� . _ _ 6 B ,��e�F a\ � t k 3 � � �,� � � � < <. . k � . � � Q ' ti -�-, _ . - p -� , ' scr ' � � �. '- DE wit b" . .'� � $ . .o ' . . � � ; 2 �'�_ k . . ti� O y 4 2 k`.�p . � �; � L� � ��_.\_ {y� _.. � � � t k ��, � � O �h 1 �"-z I� : �. N�-i. I B q` k ti N�-c- \ � k �^ � ^'�'°' � � � � ; � e\� k e\° �v�- r � I e e �' ' ,ys-is O � n ; � ,W-iG n\e: ,vs-� � B B`� h h, NS-6� � y } �` k NS-/O . e h � '� O[�\ ,i w� NS-�Y C C n �� h ^�S_/F 0 � NS-/6 ,K-i � � '� e\ h h �M1 � � k � �v � � � �`�`c lD \co.�^ kh\ � � h� O ' i� \ °� O "' ;�` i :4 i 2 " '� ' n ^ ` ^ ;\� �° k a@ v v� _`?: SP #82-04 MEDTRONIC �� .f SO. ar nro✓rrrm w.erw _ . � i.,rr,vo. i-rr W � i 2 y � 2 NOTE .� ,�r r�rf r .�. O � � /TO�LfYfC SPECUL p � � � � V �y SfCl/ON/W-e /O pf '� � • �� 2 2 h, � OSfO /OR /JO��OM'F.P . � - �--?-- --h -- � . A»N�S LE✓fL .�L(OIKICLf COAD S SO.�T /�PO✓fC7fO r-�". @ o �.'3- ----- 25 1� i-- � , ��� _ � Q � � O�/ ' � 46 \ W ��M ��� e � � \4 ` , B�AC/NG DETA/L � tSEL' QN e' SN)SEEOWG' SX710.j05 NOTf � pETA/L A W AT70/CL/o (/Sf NOCf �'F 4 �I [s��uw6��f �; � �Q���� �.-.� � � o ,I ' �useanar II I� Ns-i9 f � NOClS x;.�, ; � � ti � .vJ-� P I. ",-S ! pETA/L C DETA/L O NS'! .vJ-5 j NS-) `"�il 2 NJ-9 V � NS-// � �` NOTf .v5-/d �.� J AJBpTJOMCL/r � ' I� NS-/J O 1 v��''OlfNUl- p I�I NS-/1 � � 6f/R/rfY.f�[ 'I I NS-/9 � O o r'. �; w1-II 4 ',,,�i� NS-G 1 � � DET,4/L B y o y� O � e � yOTE • o � � DfTA/LS C, �, � D'TY/ SKI/ONS LNf 7N �ofT.r1LL� i I � O v� W�` b � .. .01 �� — � '+k "�' O �� � 5F hO `�C W � o�Y � ti� mIti � � y � � ,` < < • ANCNOR BOUS -AST/1 h� Q ` A-JISOUA!/I/ TOtr/E�P fLE/i�'T/GN y�• !t� i. aasE oii�ENSroys (FORfOUNOA%/ONOfTA/(SSffOH'G D-700.300R.J : (fORANCNOR Of7A�LS SEEO/✓G CU-730/04J j GfNERAL NOTES /. LfG ML NO /S HE/AL STANPEO �T BO/TON OF fA(N G f6 Of BOG/f0 SfCl ONS. SfCT/ON NO /S NfTAL STAN/f0 AP BOJTOK O� ONf [ fG Of Wf[Of0 SfGJ/O.vS. � PAL NUIS ARf P.PO✓/Of0 Fp.p AL( TOw'Ef BOC7S. 3. A�< MATfPUL NOl'O/oPEO GA(✓AN/If0 AF/fR FAa.P/CA�/OK I. LO[TS �G df wSTN A-3I5 GUw( i!C J G4fff NK NO /3 NfTA( ST/NifO A� ONf fN0 OF f.�CN BFA<E (eOUfD SfCTiONS Oro[r), 6. /Mf !/SE Gf StiiNS TO ofR/fCl[✓ P[UHB �Owf4 nwi' �C NFCFSSARY Z/✓NCRf OPr�/NA6l /S REGO., AO.PA/N NOLE /S o�PO✓/DEO AJlNf BASF Of f.IGV ((6 OF Tis'f SfU/ON. Q. S/Ei GO[TS o�0✓/Of0 OY! LfG ON(I' SfCT/ONS 6 N� 7N. i� < < CITY OF FRIDLEY HUMAN RESOURCES COh�1I5SI0N MEETING APRIL 1, 1982 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson van Uan called the April 1. 1982, Human Resources Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALi: Ptembers Present: Mary van Dan, Brian Goodspeed, Peter Treuenfels, Lynn Boergerhoff Members Absent: Jayne Noble Others Present: Mary Cayan, Human Resources Assistant APPROUAL OF MARCH 4. 1982, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMIS_S_I_0_N MINUTES: HOTION BY MR. GOOASPBSD� SBCONDED BY NR. TREUENFSLS� TD APPROVE SHE MARCN 4� 1982� HUMAN RSSOURCSS COMMISSION�MINUTBS AS WRITTSN, UPON A VOICfi VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CAAIRPERSON VAN DAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED �..�..«..,...,... t 1. ELECTION OF CHAIRPERSON AND VICE-CHAIRPERSON - 1982-83 Chairperson van Dan declared the naninations open for chairperson and vice-chairperson. MOTION BY liII2. TREUfiNFELS� SECONDfiD BY PII2. BOSRGERHOFF� TO NtlMZNATB MARY VAN DRN FOR CHATRPERSON AND�BRIAN GOOASPfifiD FOR VICE-CXAIRPfiRSON. Hearing no other nominations, Chairperson van Dan declared the nominations closed. MOTION BY /�2, TREUENFELS� SfiCONDED BY MR. BOERGERIiOFF� TO CAST A UNANIMDUS BALLOT FOR MARY VAN DAN AS CHASRPERSON AND BRIAN GOODSPEED AS VZCE-CHAIRPERSON. UPON A VOICB VOTS� ALL VOTING AYS� CHAIRPERSON VAN DRN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRISD UNANIMOUSLY. . 2. INTERNATIONAL YEAR OF DISABLED PERSONS: Mr. Boergerhoff stated he was sorry that he did not have any new information. He stated he hoped to soon obtain the final survey data from Health Central. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSTON MEETING, APRIL 1, 1982 PAGE 2 Mr. Treuenfels stated that even though they seem to be making progress for the disabled, sometimes they also regress, and again one of those areas is in politics, He stated at the recent DFL Convention, the affirmative action statement did not make any reference to the disabled. He did not know how many disabled persons there were in Fr.idley, but he did not see any disabled persons at the convention. He sometimes wondered how much effort was given in the City of Fridley to encourage the disabled or other minority groups to attend civic functions. Ms, van Dan stated that the IYDP Project Committee's recognition meeting on Dec. 14, i981, the Committee gave the Human Resources Commission a certificate of recognition. She stated the certificate has now been framed. She presented the certificate to Ms. Cayan and asked Ms. Cayan to find an appropriate place to display it in City Hall. 3. UPDATE ON ACCESSIBILITY SURVEY: Ms. van Dan stated Mayor Nee did sign a proclamation declaring 1982 the "National Year of Disabled Persons" in Fridley. Ms. van Dan that the first meeting for the Accessibility Survey Project Committee was held on March 16. There was an excellent turn-out, and the meeting was televised on cable TV, She stated the agenda included a general review of the Committee's purpose, a showing of the film, "Sound of Trumpets", and a presentation by Jutee Quarue-Peterson. She stated Ms. Quarve-Peterson, who is with the National Housing Institute, has now moved to Fridley and is helping the Committee in developing a basic accessibility form. Ms. van Dan stated there was a lot of input from every member who attended, and they also indicated their reasons for attending. She stated the Comnittee elected Robert Minton as chairperson. She stated the Committee is very active and met again on March 23. They have already established a third meeting for April 7. Ms. van Dan stated that at the March 23rd meeting, Ms. Quarve-Peterson outlined what can and cannot be done in mailing surveys and indicated ways by which they can get a better response. Mr. Minton is going to write a cover letter and Mayor Nee has been asked to write a cove.r tetter to be mailed with the surveys. The Committee is anticipating a 30% return rate. From there, the Corrmittee members will do the rest of the on-site process. Ms. van Dan stated there are 175 buildings of a commercial nature (out of a possible 410 buildings) that the Comnittee felt needed to be surveyed. 7hey are going to concentrate on the medicat buildings, dental buildings, schools, churches, and the buildings of everyday necessity, which would be the general shopping stores. Ms. van Dan stated the publicity plans include presentations to ab�ut ten civic groups and some promotions on cable TV and in the Frid]ey Sun. Ms. van Dan stated Ms. Quarve-Peterson has said she would be willing to have some training sessions on how to conduct the accessibility surveys. Ms. Cayan stated that since the March 23rd meeting, Staff has been compiling the list of buildings, recording each building on an index card, so the records can be kept straight between Staff and the vo7unteers. They have also put together HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSTON MEETIN6 APRIL 7 1982 PAGE 3 a potentiai outline for the final product. She stated she has talked to Ms. Quarve-Peterson, and Ms. Quarve-Peterson has alriast completed the survey, Ms. Cayan stated she will be meeting with Ruth Dunn. Editor of the Fridley Sun, to discuss publicity. Scott Wheeler wili be meeting with the person in Brooklyn Center who is in charge of their accessibility survey. Mr. Wheeler has also done a tot of follow-up on details. Ms. Cayan stated that by the Aprit 7th meeting, they should have the completed survey form and the mailing list and be ready to start the mailings. She is anticipating mailing out the surveys by the end of April. She stated she will keep the Cotmnission members informed and the Corrmission members will receive the Accessibility Survey Project Camnittee's minutes. 4. ART PRESENTATION REPORT: • Mr. Treuenfels stated that the Minneapolis Institute of Arts presented an art presentation at the fridley Library on Tuesday, March 23. The presentation was preceded by dinner attended by some of the camnissioners, the Minneapolis Institute of Arts' speaker. and some other interested citizens. Mr. 7reuenfels stated about 20-25 people attended the presentation, the group seemed to enjoy the presentation, and there were some interesting questions asked after the presentation. He stated he felt the evening was enjoyable and quite successful. Ms. van Dan stated she thought that if there had been more time for more publicity, they might have had an even larger turn-out, as the people who did come were very enthusiastic art lovers and were expressing the wish thet the Camnission get involved in the area of the arts. She stated this was not on the Comnission's work plan� but she felt whenever there is an opportunity such as this one that they should take advantage of that opportunity. Mr. Treuenfels stated this was a beginning, and there may 6e other opportunities. Ms. Cayan stated some of the other art galleries in the Twin Cities area may offer speakers and programs, and perhaps it was something they could look into. 5. NO FAULT GRIEVANCE PROCEDllRE TRAINING - REPOR'T: Mr. Treuenfels stated he had gotten a good response from Coon Rapids Human Rights Comnission and about five commissioners were p7anning on attending the training with the Fridley Human Resources Commission. He had also contacted the Golum6ia Heights Numan Rights Comnission chairperson. The Columbia Heights Human Rights Co�nission is already functioning as a huinan rights group and are already into the no-fault grievance procedure, so there may only be 1-2 people interested in attending. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 1, 1982 PAGE 4 Mr. 7reuenfels stated that at the last Comnission meeting, they had tentatively set the training date for April 24. He stated that because of another conflict, he is now suggesting Sat., June 12: He stated this date is agreeable to the State Department of Human Rights. The Commissioners were in agreement with June l2 as the date for the No Fault Grievance Procedure training. Mr. Treuenfels stated he would contact both the Coon Rapids'and Colum6ia Heiqhts' Human Rights Commissions and notify them that the date has been changed from April 24 to June 12. 6. OTHER BUSINESS: a. Commission Work Plan Ms. van Dan stated that on March 8, the City Council approved the Human Resources Commission's work plan. " b. "Thank You" to Dick Harris Mr. Treuenfels stated that Dick Harris is retiring as Chairperson of the Planning Commission, and he thought it would be nice if the Human Resources Commission v;ished him well and thanked him for the support and help he has given the Human Resources Commission chairpersons. MOTION BY MR. TRSUENFELS� SECONDED BY MR. GOODSPEED� THAT�TXE NUINAN RE50URCES COMMISSION WISXES TO EXPRESS THEIR APPRECIATION FOR THE . SUPPORT TXEY HAVE RECBSVkD FROM MR. DICK HARRIS FOR THE YARIDUS PROJECSS THS HUMAN�RESOURCES COMMISSION HAS UNDERTAXEN IN TXE PAST. THS COMMISSION AISO WISHES TO THANK XIM FOR THE FINE WORICING RELATION- SHIPS THE HUMAIV RESW*RCSS COMMISSION CHAIRPERSONS XAVE HAD WITH HIM ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION� AND THE COMMISSION MEMBERS WISH HIM WELL IN HIS FUTURS ENDEAVORS. UPON R VOICS VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHRIRPERSON VAN DAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRZED UNANIMWSLY. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION HY FIIt. BOERGERHOFF, SECONDED BY MR. TREUENFEIS� TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOT&'� ALL VOTING AYE� CHATRPERSON VAN�DAN DECLARED THE APRIL 1� 1982� XUMAN.RESOURCES COMMZSSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:35 P.M. Respectfully submi ted, � ynp Sa a Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEY HOUSING & REDEVELOP�1ENT AUTHORITY MEETING APRIL 8, 1982 CALL T� �ROER Chairperson Commers called the April 8, 1982, Housing & Redevelopment Authority meeting to order at 7:44 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Larry Commers, Russel Nouck, Carolyn Svendsen, Duane Prairie Members Absent: Elmars Prieditis Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner Virgil Herrick, City Attorney Sid Inman, City Finance Director Mark Haggerty, 6441 University Ave. N.E. Chery7 Nybo, 1612 Berne Circle Ted Burandt, 6211 Riverview Terrace A. E, Singer, 378 - 64th Ave. N.E. Eric Andersen, 4744 IDS Center Gene Noff, 100 N.E. Alden Circle Nancy Koepcke, 3073 Crestview Dr, N.E. Kurt Larson, Columbia Heights Len Schollen, 6381 University Ave. N.E. W. G. Doty, 6379 University Ave. N.E. APPROVAL OF MARCH 11, 1982, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MIP�UTES: MOTION BY MR. PRAIRIE� SECONDED BY MR. HOUCK� TO RPPROVE THE MARCH 11� 1982� HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE� RLL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRSED UNANIMOUSLY. APPROVAL OF MARCH 24, 1982, H�USING & REDEVELOPMEPJT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MOTION BY MS, SVENDSEN� SECONDED BY MR. HOUCK� TO APPROVE THE MARCH 24� 1982� HOUSING 6 REDEVELOPMENT RUTHORITY MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECI.ARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AU7NORITY MEETING, APRIL 8 1982 PAGE 2 I. CENTER CITY PROJECT A. Columbia Park Clinic Review of Contract Documents and Financial Commitment from Juran & Moody (Memo #82-24 fran Executive Director) The HRA reviewed the contract documents and financia7 commitment with Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, prior to the meeting. Mr. Herrick stated he had discussed with the HRA the same thing he and Mr. Boardman had discussed with Mr. Eric Ander,en, attorney for Columbia Park Properties, about the fact that the financial commitment does have certain enumerated items that, if they occurred, wou7d relieve Juran & Moody from the obligation to finance. The concern he had, as he understood the commitment, was it would be necessary to have the HRA and the City in a position where they could deliver a valid title in order to give a first mortgage at the time of closing. This would require the HRA or the City to commence acquisition of the real estate when there still exists the possibility that something could happen that would make the commitment not valid. Mr. Herrick stated he would like Mr. Andersen's corrments on his understanding of the commitment, and perhaps Mr. Andersen could relate to the HRA what negotiations he has had with Juran & Moody in terms of tightening up the commitment. t4r. Eric Andersen stated the commitment is different from a standard commitment in that the interest rate is not specified. He thought that was probably the only difference between this commitment and a regular financing commitment. He stated there are some outs the underwriter has based on the industrial revenue bond market falling apart, but he thought it was treated in the industry as a firm under- writing commitment. He stated �uran & Moody is agreeing to buy the bonds at the rate set by the market. There are conditions, but there are conditions to any financing commitment they have to meet. The conditions are really very similar to any other financing commitments, except for the conditions of the bond market. That is something that is inherent in revenue bond financing and is something they cannot do anything about. Mr. Andersen stated the idea is that Juran & Moody has agreed to buy the bonds, they have approved the credit of the company, the terms of the deal, security, guarantees, etc. That is basically the nature of this underwriting commitment as compared to any other commitment they would require in a redevelopment project. Mr. Commers stated the HRA's concern was on page 4, paragraph 1, of the commitment document with the requirement that the title be trans- ferred prior to the closing of the commitment with the bonding company and the requirement that the HRA has to immediately commence HOUSING & REDEUELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, APRIL 8, 1982 PAGE 3 acquisition or commence condemnation in order to acquire title of the property. The HRA is looking at whether the possibility exists that a title insurance company would give a title commitment on the property if the HRA gave them assurance of indemnification if the HRA was unable to get the title commitment. He stated that allows the HRA to make sure the Clinic's closing takes place, and it allows Columbia Park Properties to have the security and have the mortgage company secured on the basis of the commitment from the title insurance company. Mr. Andersen stated that was a possibility. He stated they could close their financing if they had a canmitment from Title Insurance Company of Minnesota or another reputable title company saying they would insure the fee title in Columbia Park Properties, and they would insure the mortgage. At that point; however, if there was any question about whether or not there is the,ahility to cane up with that title, he believed his client would have some concern in guaranteeing a public offering of bonds and committinq to build a project with the possibility of going into default 6ecause it could not perform, because it actually did not get the title. Mr. Commers stated it can produce title, it do it. is not a question of produc►ng title; they is just a question of when they are going to Mr. Herrick stated he thought that fact, coupled with indemnification on behalf of the City and the HRA, should make Columbia Park Properties relatively secure, However, it did raise a question in his mind as to whether that process would delay a time when construction could start. He thought it probably would and that was another factor to be considered. Maybe they should discuss wfiat has been suggested about getting a title commitment subject to their guarantee of title and indemnification. What amount of time would that set back the construction process and how important would that be? Mr,Andersen stated they feel they can close the revenue bond financing in June. That would delay construction for the time it would take f.or the City to acquire the land. Columbia Park Properties would like to start construction as quick7y as possible. Mr. Commers stated he thought the most feasible and practical way to go was to see if a title insurance company would give a commit- ment based on the HRA`s guarantee, because even if they started now, there would be no guarantee they would have title to all those properties by June 1. Mr. Andersen stated he would check with Minnesota Title and Juran & P400dy to see if this was acceptable to them. He was not sure what the land acquisition-cost was on this project, but one aspect of the HOUSING & RE�EVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING APRIL 8 1982 PAGE 4 deal he believed should give the HRA some comfort was that once the redevelopment contract is signed and the commitment is in place, the partnership has the obtigation to go forward, too, if the HRA does not, to the extent that if the HRA commits its resources and the partnership defaults, there is a credit worthy buyer that as probably good for its promises. Mr. Andersen referred to Section 9.2, "Remedies on Default", page 25 of the contract documents. He stated, as he understood that section, the NRA would have the right to sue for damages or for specific performance. Mr. Herrick stated he beiieved the City could maintain an action against Columbia Park Properties for non-compliance with the contract. Mr. Andersen stated neither he nor his client wouid be adverse to the arrangement that has been suggested. He did not think his client was interested in any more delays, particularly in light of the delays that have been incurred to date, through no fault of the HRA. Mr. Herrick asked Mr. Andersen which of the fol7owing two choices he feTt CoTumbia Park Properties would prefer: 1, getting a title insurance company to agree to issue a commitment prior to obtaining title on the assurance that the City or the HRA would acquire title and would indemnify in case they did not; 2. getting a letter from Columbia Park Properties to the HRA requesting the kRA to proceed to acqufre title pursuant to the terms of this contract and, if for any unforeseen reason, the commitment is not honored, Columbia Park Properties wouid be responsible for any out-of-pocket costs the HRA had. Mr. Andersen stated he thought they would prefer the letter of indemnification in order to start things moving now. Mr. Nerrick stated he fe7t the HRA should approve the contract, ask Columbia Park Properties for an indemnification letter, and indicate that the HRA will proceed to start acquiring property as soon as the letter is received from Co7umbia Park Properties. He stated one factor that is positive is the HRA is dealing with a substantial entity that has good assets and is very credit worthy, Mr. Prairie stated he felt it was certainly in the best interests of the HRA to move ahead. Mr. Comners stated it was his understanding that the approval of this contract did not obligate the HRA in relation to the assessments or mak9ng any decision on the assessments at this time. Mr. Herrick stated that was correct. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, APRIL 8, 1982 PAGE 5 MOTION BY AII2, HOUCK� SECONDED BY MR, PRAIRIE� TO APPROVE T�E CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE HRA AND COLUMBIA PARK PROPERTIES AND THE FINANCING COMMITMENT LETTER FROM JURRN & MOODY� SUBJECT TO THE NEGOTIATION OF A SRTISFACTORY LETT6R OF INDEMNIFICATION bY THE CITY ATTORNEY AND THE RTTORNEY FOR COLUMBIA PARK PROPERTIES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNRNIMOUSLY. B. 73rd Ave. Partnership 1. Review of Contract Documents and Financial Commitment (Memo #82-25 from Executive Director) Mr. Haggerty stated the contt^act documents had been discussed that afternoon, but there were a couple of areas in ihe document that have to be explored further: (1) who is responsible for any potential drainage problems; (2) they have decided on a new layout for the office building and there were some concerns regarding that. Mr. Herrick stated the area that seemed to cause Mr. Haggerty the most concern was the timing in the development of the plaza area. Mr. Haggerty stated they are concerned in putting the office building together about the fact that the clinic, the office building, the parking lot, and the plaza are to be completed at approximaiely the same time. He stated Mr. Boardman has said he cannot make any corronit- ment as to when the plaza is going to be completed. It may not be started until next spring. He stated he told Mr. Boardman that they still want to sell bonds about �he same time as the Clinic and place those funds into a high interest-bearing account and then start groundbreaking at a point where tfiey feel the completion of their project would coincide with the Clinic and the plaza. He stated he has asked Mr. Boardman to do more investigation as to a reasonable time frame on the plaza, as it will make a difference in their costs, f4r. Haggerty stated right now he has to make a decision on whether it would be 6etter to delay comnencement of construction and only pay 21/100 of 1% of that delay on an annual basis or to just corrnnence " construction and leave the building at only 20-50°/ occupied until the rest of it is completed. Before.he can make that decision, he needs a better idea about when the plaza will be completed. Mr. Boardman stated that right now the City is in the process of interviewing about twelve design architects. They are trying to set up a desiqn contest between three design firms so they can get the best design project for Fridley. They are looking at a 30-day HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, APRIL 8, 1982 PAGE 6 design competition with a selection after that period of time to go to working drawings. They could possibly go out for bids in September and start the plaza, but he doubted if they would get everything done, as far as landscaping in the plaza, until next spring. Mr. Boardman stated they are looking at parking as part of the public improvement so when the road goes in, the parking will go in. They are looking at the possibility of doing the road at the end of August to September. Mr. Haggerty stated they have worked out a site design profile of the bui7ding they think will work out better from the perspective of rental and the design factor. He stated it was his suggestion that they check into these problems, firm up these problems, and make the appropriate changes in the contract, Since the construction of the office building is three months shorter than construction of the Clinic and since they missed the Aprit market date, it might be best to defer the actua7 approval of the contract documents until more information is received regarding the potential drainage problems and the development of the plaza. He stated he was sure he could have the contract documents and financial commitment ready for the HRA's May 13th meeting. MOTSON BY MR. HOUCK� SECONDED BY MS, SVENDSEN� TO CONTINUE THE REVIEW AND APPROVRL OF TXE 73RD AVE, PARTNERSXSP DOCUMENTATION UNTIL TXE NEXT MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTIDN CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. City Council Discussion on City Property Purchase (Memo #82-26 from Executive Director) Mr, Boardman stated that at the City Council's March 29th meeting, they discussed the Phase II office project and the options they have in regard to the use of City property for this development. The City Council gave the9r preference on the way they would like the HRA to handle the purchase of City property, Their preference is a direct purchase of the property at $2/sq. ft. The portion of the building that is on City property is 9,310 sq, ft., and the portion that is on the parking ]ot is 30,100 sq, ft. The City Council is requesting that, when the district no longer exis�s, the HRA sell the parking lot property back to the City for $1 to continue tfie lease arrangements on parking. Mr. Commers asked if this was the most advantageous thing for the HRA. As he understood it, the City Council wants the HRA to spend a sub- stantial amount of money on the plaza, and maybe they should negotiate with the City for some medium ground, He was not sure the HRA should be responsible for everything. HOUSING & REDEVELOPP�ENT AUTHORITY MEETING, APRIL 8, 7982 PAGE 7 Mr. Boardman stated he thought it would be advantageous-fvr the City Council and HRA to have a joint meeting so this issue can be discussed. Mr. Commers stated he thought Staff should put together some projec- tions about the kind of proposal numbers they are talking about in terms of assessments, acquisition costs, and plaza costs. He asked Staff to communicate the HRA's concerns to the City Council and that the HRA would like to meet jointly with the City Council within the next 60 days to discuss these issues. Center City Financial Analysis 1. Report from Ehlers & Associates and Report on Cash Flow Analysis (Memo #82-27 from Executive Director) Mr. Sid Inman and Mr. Boardman reviewed the computer runs from Ehlers & Associates and the cash flow analysis. Assessment Analysis (Memo #82-28 from Executive Director) Mr. Boardman stated that regarding the road, the parking lot, and sewer and water, they are looking at trying to at least combine the project, if possible, with the other street and sewer projects in the City. At this point in time, they do have preliminary engineering estimates on water, sanitary improvement, and street improvements. They have gone to the City Councii for ordering the plans and specs on the project. What they need now is some commitment from the HRA in order to petition for street improvements so they can get it put into a bid proposal in order to get the best price. That is the reason for Resolution No. HRA - 1- 1982. Mr. Commers asked if the HRA could approve Resolution No. HRA-1-1982 omitting paragraph 3, "that the Authority agrees to enter into necessary contracts with the City of Fridley to incur 100( of the cost for said improvements", and have it subject to what the HRA negotiates with the City Council on assessments and the plaza? Mr. Commers stated he thought the HRA should have a meeting with the City Council before the HRA commits to pay everything on the assess- ments and on the plaza and see if there isn't some type of contribution or responsibility the City would like to assume on this project. Mr. Herrick amended paragraph #3 to read: "That the Authority agrees to furnish funds for the initial payment of the costs of those items enumerated in #1 above; but reserves the right to negotiate with the City over the final distribution of costs." The HRA agreed with this amendment to Resolution No. HRA-1-1982. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, APRIL 8, 1982 PAGE 8 MOTION BY MR. PRAIRIE� SECONDED BY MR. HOUCK� TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. HRR-1-1982, "A RESOLUTION PETITIDNZNG�THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FOR STREET Id7PROVEMENTS� SRNITARY SEWER LATERAL AND SERVICES� WATER LATERAL AND SERVICES� AND STORM SEWER FACILITIES"� WITH THE STIPULATION THAT ITEM #�3 BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: "TXAT THE RUTHORITY AGREES TO FURNISH FUNDS FOR THE INITIAL PAYMENT OF THE COSTS OF THOSEi2TEMS ENUMERATED IN �1 ABOVE; BUT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE CITY OVER TXE FINAL DISTRIBUTION OF COSSS." UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� CHATRPERSON COMMERS bECLIIRED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANSMOUSLY. D. Discussion on Project Des9qn Consultant (Memo #82-29 from Executive Director) Mr. Boardman stated he would like to have some concurrence from the HRA that the direction they are going in hiring a proje�t design consu7tant is the right direction, One direction they have looked at and feel may get them a better project is some remuneration to the three firms they select for competition. Mr. Commers asked Mr, Boardman to put together a proposa7 on this that the HRA can review and approve at their next meeting. Mr. Prairie asked about the time span. Mr. Boardman stated they are looking at a 30-day competition. They will be narrowing the selection down to 3-4 firms; and, hopefully, by the end of April they will be ready to put together a scope and direction, and bring the three firms back to the HRA, Once the HRA selects the three firms and goes with the scope Staff has set up, they are 7ooking at another 3q days. Hopeful7y, that will be between the May HRA meeting and the June HRA meeting, and by June they will have three concept proposai that will be submitted to the HRA to select an architect. Then it is feasible they will have working drawings within 3D-40 days and will be able to accept, make modifications, and go out for the plaza. Mr. Commers stated it was the concensus of the HRA for Staff to move forward in that direction with the selection of an architect. E. A roval of Final Estimate and Authorization of Pa ment of Contract on Demolition of ChriStenSen Buildin Letter from Jo n F ora, Pu6 ic Works Director Mr. Commers stated that what is needed is approval and authorization to pay the contractor the balance of the contract price. Ms. Svendsen stated that in the "Report on Final Inspection for Demoiition of Building at 6471 University Ave. N.E." dated April 8, 1982, the second paragraph stated: "All deficiencies have been corrected by the contractor. HOUSING & REDEVE_LOPMENT AUTHORITY MEE7ING, APRIL 8, 1982 PAGE 9 Also, the work for which the City feels the contractor shou7d receive a reduced price has been agreed upon by the contractor." She wondered what that meant. Mr. Commers stated maybe they could approve the payment, conditioned upon Mr. Boardman's checking into this and reporting back to the HRA as to whether or not there was any change in the contract price. MOTION BY MR. HOUCK� SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRSE� TO APPROVE TXE FINAL ESTIMRTE OF $10�840 RND TO AUSHORTZE THE PAYMENT OF THE CONTRACT� CON- DITIONED UPON THE EXECUTNE DIRECTOR FINDING OUT WHETHER OR NOT TXERE WAS ANY CHANGE iN THE CONTRACT PRICE, " Mr. Commers asked Mr. Soardman to report back at the next meeting. UPON R VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON COMh7ER5 DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. F, Letter to Earl Wyatt on Purchase of Telephone Building Mr. Boardman declared the letter dated April 2, 1982, from Mr. Boardman to Mr. Wyatt received into the record. At the last meeting, the HRA authorized Mr. Boardman to proceed with the acquis5tion of the North- western Bell Telephone building property. II. MOORE LAKE PROJECT: A. Cheryl Nybo Pro�osal (Memo #82-30 from Executive Director) Mr. Boardman stated as he noted in his memo, Mr. Burandt is asking $60,000 for his property if he can retain the existing structure to be moved off the site. The appraised value as documented by Curtis Larson is $46,300, Mr. Boardman stated he has tried to compromise on a value of $55,000 which is midway between Mr. Burandt's asking price and the appraised va7ue. Mr. Leon Madsen of the City Assessor's Dept., felt that was a good compromise as far as the differences in va7ues, Mr. Boardman stated that without an agreed-upon purchase price, they cannot make the necessary agreement for options on the property. He stated he has talked to Ms. Nybo and she has indicated she is in the position at this point in time to sign financing commitments. Now they need to work out contract documents, and they hope to have the contract documents worked out within a week or two. Mr. Surandt stated he has negotiated from $65,000 down to $60,000. In lieu of the fact that he has carried the property for this long, he doesn't want to go down any lower in price. He stated another thing he wanted to point out is that the building Ms. Nybo is in now was purchased 22-3 years ago for $150,000. The lot she is on now is smaller than his lot. He stated his attorney feels if they have to go to court, they wi17 not have a problem, and his attorney feels $6D,000 is too low. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, APRIL 8 1982 PAGE 10 Mr. Boardman stated it is up to the HRA whether they feel they should go with a$60,000 value and Mr, Burandt would retain the existing structure and move it off the site, or whether the HRA wanted to make a purchase offer and, if necessary, go to condemnation. Mr. Commers stated the HRA was not in the position to go to anoiher number because of their position as a public corporation. They have some obliga- tion with regard to the appraisa]. Mr. Burandt stated he has an appraisal for the property Ms. Nybo is on now, and it shows a higher land cost for tha� property than the HRA is offering him, That was appraised for Central Northwesiern Bank. Mr. Commers asked Mr. Boardman to meet with Mr, Burandt and get those appraisal numbers for the HRA, if Mr. Burandt was willing to release those figures. Mr. Burandt stated he had no problem with that. The problem he had was the fact that he sti]] did not have a commitment. This is all secondary, because Ms. Nybo doesn't have the commitmeni in yet. He stated they have been going through this for a year now. He stated he has empathy with Ms. Nybo's position in wanting to wait for the bond market to go down, but if Ms. Nybo wants to buy more time, she should pay for it. He stated that at the March llth HRA meeting, Ms. Nybo was granted an extension of 30 days until this meeting, so this was all supposed to have been worked out by now. He stated he is at the point right naw where he would just as soon see Ms. Nybo's developmental rights termipated so he can move on with that property and do something different, Ms. Nybo stated she was going to buy the property from Mr. Burandt a year ago for $49,000. Then the HRA got involved and the price escalated. She felt this project is something that takes time; it is a step-by-step process. If Mr. Burandt was to try to pursue something and go out to get financing, he would see the road blocks that are out there. She stated that in talking to First Corporate Services, they feel this project has moved along and to fiave this continual pressure is not a normal thing. She stated she is very close at this time, Ms. Nybo stated that Mr. Burandt made the statement at the 7ast HRA meeting that he has had financial losses and she has noi. She stated she also has invested thousands of dollars in the project to get to this point. Mr. Boardman stated he felt it would take until the next HRA meeting to 9et the contract documents ready so the HRA can make some decisions at that meeting. He stated it is his understanding that Ms, �ybo is in the position to sign financial documents and, therefore, they should move ahead with the project. In the meantime, he will attempt to resolve some price HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, APRIL 8, 1982 PAGE 11 issues with Mr. Burandt, because the HRA will get involved in-acquisition of the property if the project goes through, He stated he would like to be in the position to say this is an agreed-to price with Mr, Burandt so that as soon as the HRA approves the contract documents and the financial commitment, he can go to Mr. Burandt with the agreed-to dollar amount and there wi17 not be any condemnation. He stated he needed some direction from the HRA on how far they feel they should extend this project, Mr. Prairie suggested they grant one more extension of 30 days, and then make it clear that is the final extension. Mr. Burandt stated it was his understanding that the previous 30-day extension was the last one. He stated he did not want this dragged out any more. He would agree to 30 days, but then thai is the end, MOTION BY MR. HOUCK� SECONDED BY MS. SVENDSEN� TO EXTEND A FINAL 30-DAY RIGHT OF DEVELOPMENT TO CHERYL NYBO WITH THE CONDITZON THAT� IF RT THE END OF 30 DAYS� TNE EXECUTED FINANCING COMMITMENT IS NOT PRESENTED TO THE HRA� THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS WILL TERNINATE RT THAT POINT, UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNRNIMOUSLY. III. NORTH PARK PRO�ECT A. Letter from G, W. Paschke (Memo #82-31 from Executive Director) Mr. Commers stated that in Mr. Paschke's letter to Mr, Boardman, he is requesting information on assistance fran the City with respect to bad soil. Mr. Boardman stated they are going to have a 7ot of projects in this area, and because of the bad soil conditions and the limitation on the tax increment district through loss of fiscal disparities funds, they should start analyzing some of the things they need like draindge so they do not give everything up into ground costs. They need to set some standards by which they can analyze each and every project. He stated he hoped to have some guidelioes drawn up by the May 13th meeting. IV. FINANCIAL A. Check Re�c ister MOSZON BY hIIt, PRAIRIE� SECONDED BY MS. SVENDSEN, TO RPPROVE THE CHECK REGISTER DATED APRIL 7� 1982� IN THE AMOUNT OF $11�6I6.25, UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECI,FIRED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, APRIL 8, 1982 PAGE 12 ADJOURNMENT: Chairperson Commers declared the April 8, 1982, Housing & Redevelopment Authority meeting adjourned at 10:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, r/X�C neSaa Recording Secretary � City of Fridley APP�AIS CO2uSS5I0n i+�T�G - AP�II, 13 1982 P:-.v� 1 CALL TO 03D�3� Chairwoman Gabel calle3 the April 13, 1982, Appeals Commission rieeting to oxder at 7i35 P.m. ROLL CALLi i"embers Presents Patricia Gabel, Alex Earna, Jean Gerou, Jim Plemel I�:embers Absent� tdone Others Presents Rent Hill� Economic Develop*,ent Assistznt, City of Fridley James IQick, 1506 Ononda�a Street N r., rridle;�, Tti APPROVi, 1,PP:.t:LS C0.•B�.ISSIO"� Y'I:3'7.�5 OF �J+3CH 16, 19g2� P_OTIOD? by Nis, Gerou, seconded by i,r. Ba*na, to approve the Iarch 16, 1982� AFpeals �onr�ission Minutes as written, CPON A VOIC� VOTE, .'LL VO.LNG �iY�', Ck'vsL�;70N'_Si; GA�L i�^,•CLl�RnD Ti� A;D�IOt� CA_`'�Ii� J\'.:I+Ii�iOL'SLY. T:�TIOP? by Nm. Plerael, seconded by i•:s. Gerou, to consider a�enda item number two before s�enda item one, UPON 1� JOI�s VO'P:s, kL•L Vv^Tu�G AiT., CYs.IA IOitii{fi GA�L ,�:CL6?�'D ?"rIE YiO�ION CARP�T'r�D IIiTAhIi10�SLY, 1, 1:J:'IC"_? by l:s, Geron,• seconded by i:r. �rna, to opc+n thc� pub7?c hearir:g, UPOi� � '.'CI:'; 'JO'.^� � ALL VOTI?d�� AYc� CIiAIiT�?Oi�Ne `ii.3aL uECU,:.^.D T'rI� P;.'SLIC i: i.:tT::r Q.t:.'fi nT 7,3a p,r,, ALMitiISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 1506 Onondaga Street N.E. A. PUBLIC PURP�E SERVED BY REQUIRF•MENT: Section 205.053, 4C, requires a rear yazd depth of not less than 25 percent di the lot depth, r+itii not less than 25 feet permitted or more than 40 feet required for the main building. Public purpase served by this sequirement is to provide reax yard space to be used for green areas wkuich enhance the neighborhood. APP'?•AIS COi•?ZSSIOh PhTIS2G - APRSS. 13 1932 PAvr. 2 B. STATED IiARDSFTIP- "A 25 foot rear lot set back would allow for only an 11 foot addition to my garage. With a 6 foot variance I could still be under the 1,000 square foot maximinn garage size. The entire garage addition would be constructed within my 6 foot privacy fence." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVI This lot is on the southwest corner of Onondaga Street and Pinetree Lane. The house fronts on Onondaga Street and the side of the attached garage is along Pinetree Lane but exits onto Onondaga Street. This corner lot is approximately 114 fect by 96,23 feet. When the house was constructed, it was the opinion oi the Building Inspector that the front of the lot would be the direction the house faced because of the almost square size of the lot. It is the concensus of the City staff that we should consider the frontage on this lot the same as when it was built. The 24 foot by 17� foot addition is proposed for the back of the garage coming uithin 19 feet of the rear lot line. The house adjacent to the rear yard is 10.2 feet f mm the co�non lot line making 29,2 feet between structures. If the Board's decision is to grant this variance the staff has no stipulations to reco�nend. I•'s. Jarss IQick, 1j06 Onenda�a Street ?� �„ Fri3ley- p:ir.aesota Has present, I"r, Hill provided the Com*nission i:embers rrith an aerial view and a recent picture of the property. �'s, Klick stated that rrith the addition an Irshaped dhelling crould be c:eated tying the house, patio and garage together. He indicated that the addition woalri'be used for two boats and additional stora�e of thin's presently stored outside the present �ara�e, Ci±airwo�-ian Gebel asl:ed if he had consulted any o£ his nei;hbors concerning this addition and i°:r, I�-ick responded that he had talked with a few and they didn't object. ?"s. hill added that none o£ the nei�hbors h2d filed a complaint atout this addition and that none would have �rindoias t�t faced the proposed addition. i�r. ilick said that the entrance from his property onto Onondaga Street would r,ot c?:ange, ChairR�ossn Gabel asked if he would be doin� the const?vction hirnself and ?�r, KLick said he had a�eneral contractor wl�o troatd do the wor:c ard that the contraetor said it would no � be a �roblem to r.etch or at least cone very close to n,atcy�ing the shin�les and siding on the present d�7elling, Chai:�taoman "vabel asked c:hen the pro�csed construction rrould be�in znd is. ilick rasponded aboui the r.-d3Ze oY F.ay. �hair-k*o.�n �ra�Z noted that the stated hardship t:as t�s lacli of storage space, :•:CTIO�: by t r, u.r_�a, seconded by 1•:s, Gerou, to close the public hearing, JPOii 1! VG_T;;�VO L, ALL 'J01P.cG AY.:, CY�+I:,^+Old+?u G.+�sL iltCL�iL3D1'fE P0�'LIC F.::fw I'ivG CLGS3il �lm 7s�$ P.Pi. ,.... APP�r,LS CO?��iISSIO'? F;�]r_Ll`G - AP;II, 13, 1982 Pi.;,y 3 T:O:IOP? by p�r. Plemel, seconded by l7r, Fsarna, to apFrove t�e variance request to reduce the rear yard setback from the minimum of 25 £eet to 19 Seet, to allow a 24 foot by 17� foot addition to an existing attached �arage� located on Lot 4, Block 1, Jim Lzn3 �states, tne same beino 150o Onondaga Street ,G,B, UPO� A POIC"t V0_�, AI,L `JOi�hG Ati:;, C:iA�?iG1:.=:'.� GA.F.�.�L Dr.CL^P:::i TF� Ii0:I0i: Cii?YZ;:: UtJAtI�:OIISLY, 2. ELECTION OF CHAZRPERSON AND VICE-CHAIRPERSON 1982-19$3 N0;:111?TIOiJ by Ns. �rna, seconded by 1�s, Plemel, o£ Patricia Gabel to serve as Chairperson for 1492-1983. UPOP: A VOIc;.; YCPE, ALL VOiII:3 AYS;, PATP,ICL+ GABEL ti� ^,S EI�C::,D TO �R'l' AS CF.AIFP�; SOP;, fi01I:dl:TIOr� by P:s, Gerou, seconded by 2's. Ple:sel, of Alex �rna to serve as Vice-Chair�;rson £or 19R2-1�83• UPON i� VCI� VO r, ��LL VOPI:;G k�:, ALc.:{ EARt•iA TIAS EI:;CTnD Tp Sc,RVE A$ VI�-C:iAL�Fr;itSON. ADJOU?�•??s:.*IT t r:0^Io?v by- ?�"s, Ple:nel, seconded by is. Fzrna, ALL VOTi;3 AYm, CPJ{L�:?O::It1 GATi.,-'L D3�L�LR.::1 Ti'.E nP�n, 13, 1952, Ai�JOU?�d::D kT 7�50 P.I�:. 3espect°c11y submitted, Pat 'Jon ;:osch P.ecording Secretary to ad journ. UPO.d A VGI� VO �' , APPF:AIS COI:;iISSIO.v' ::�iIf�3 OF � ;; i,�, CITY Of FRIDLEV PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSIDN MEETIN6 APRIL 6, 1982 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Kondrick called the April 6, 1982, Parks & Recreation Commission meeting to order at 7:35 p,m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Dave Kondrick, Jan Seeger, Mary Schreiner Members Absent: Dick Young, Dan Allen Others Present: Charles Boudreau, Parks & Recreation Director � Jack Kirk, Recreation Supervisor Siah St. Clair, City Naturalist APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 2, 1482, PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: � MOTZON BY MS. SESGER� SECONDED BY MS. SCHREINER� TO APPROVE THE FEBRUARY 2� 1982� PARKS & RECREATION COMMCSSION MINUTES. � . UPON R VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYS� CHAIRPERSON XONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUBLY. INTRODUCTION OF MARY SCHREINER, NEW COMMISSION MEMBER: Mr. Kondrick introduced Ms. Schreiner and welcomed her to the Commission. 1. DIRECTOR'S REPORT: Dr. Boudreau stated he has asked �ack Kirk to give a brief report on the summer program. He has also asked Siah St. Clair to come and talk about the preliminary master plan he has for the continued development of Spring- brook Nature Center. a. Summer Program Report - Jack Kirk Mr. Kirk stated the spring program brochure went out about two weeks ago, and they began registration last week. Most of those programs will begin the second week in April. The spring program is a short program of about six weeks. Mr, Kirk stated the summer program brochure will be out about the first week of May. They will start registration on May 17. Fran all indications, they expect a larger turn-out for the summer programs this year, because of rri�rs � �� �. ,.. PARKS & RECREA7ION COMMISSION MEETIMG APRIL 6 1982 PAGE 2 the fact that a lot of schools are cutting 6ack on sumner school programning. He has taiked to people at both District 14 and i6, and they seem to think a lot of students who were taking summer enrichment courses will now be signing up for recreation programs. Mr. Kirk stated the Spring Lake Park School District 16 contacted the City of Fridley about three months ago as they were concerned that they may not have any summer school at all. Since that time, they have learned they wil] have surroner school, but in the event there was no summer school, they wanted to see if there were some ways they could work with Fridley in improving programming. Because of the fact that Fridley is involved with a section of Spring Lake Park School District, and the City of Spring Lake Park is involved with a section of Slaine, the three recreation departments got together and have set the groundwork for a tri- city fitness-type program that would be operated in the morning hours in the Spring Lake Park School District this year. Be�ause Fridley is taking part, it wiTi be open to any Fridley residents, but it is on a triai basis to see what kind of response they get from that area and from the City as a whole. It is a first to have three cities working together on programming. Mr, Kirk stated the playground program is pretty well put together. The locations will once again be disbursed throughout the City. It will be a seven-week program, Monday Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday, with Wednesday as excursion day. The PITS �Playground in the Streets) program involves a mobile recreation vehicle with equipment that goes to areas in the City that do not have organized playgrounds. This program has met with mixed success in the past, so they are looking et this program. Mr, Kirk stated one of the areas that continues to be very popular is adult softball. They have 108 teams signed up for adu7t softball and there are 12 teams on a waiting list. He stated they will discuss this further under "new business" along with the proposed sumner activity fee schedule. Mr, Kirk stated he will bring the Commission up to date on the summer programming at the next meeting. Dr. Boudreau stated that in reviewing the applications for sumner part- time maintenance for the playgrounds and around the City, they have found they probably have more applications this year than ever before, They still stay with the criteria that all Fridley residents have first priority on all.jobs. For the most part, the majority of those they have hired for the summer are in the older age bracket (college-age) as opposed to previous years when they have been mostly high schoo] age. He stated one other criteria they have continued with is that the returning employee who has done a satisfactory job in the past will a]so fit ihto the priority category. ..- e. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETIN6, APRIL 6, 1982 PAGE 3 1982 Shade Tree Program Dr. Boudreau stated he had included in the agenda packet a copy of a letter from the State of Minnesota Department of Agriculture which stated: "First, the recently enacted state budget reduction cancelled a11 funds for shade tree grants to communities for 1982. You will receive no financial assistance from the state for expenses you incur in operating a local shade tree program in 1982." Dr, Boudreau stated the City is not going to get reimbursed for their shade tree program, and there is no longer any state taw that says the shade tree inspection program is mandatory. Ne stated he has informed City Council of this. He stated they have recommended to City Council, and City Council somewhat concurred with the recommendation, that for the year 1982, the shade tree control inspector will do only two complete inspections in the City (as opposed to three), one at "leaf-out" in the early spring and the second in the fall (late Aug./early Sept.). When the inspector sees a diseased tree, he will mark the tree and inform the homeowner of the diseased tree on the homeownerSs property. He will encourage the homeowner to have the tree removed at the homeowner's expense. He stated the homeowner used to have to pay 50% of the cost of that removal. The Gity is hoping they will get this cooperation from the citizens. Trees that are found to be diseased on public property will either be removed in-house with their own maintenance people, or they will go to a contractor to have the tree removed, Dr. Boudreau stated mast of the surrounding the same type of program of inspecting and remove diseased trees on their properties. Co�nunity Park corrununities are doing about encouraging the homeowners to Dr, Boudreau stated they are planning to get the contractor into the park as soon as possible this spring. They have fencing they want put up, and they have the irrigation contract which carried over from last year. He stated they hope to have the fields somewhat in playing condition by this fall. He stated they are about a year behind because of the weather last fall and the truckers' strike, Dr. Boudreau stated they have approached the County to purchase a windmill and a pump in order to keep the pond at a steady elevation and to irrigate the fields. d. Communications - Willis R. Unke Dr. Boudreau passed out dated Feb. 22 and March information on7y. two letters from Mr. Unke to the City Council 13, 1982. He stated they were for the Comnission's PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 6, 1982 PAGE 4 2. CHAIRPERSON'S REPORT: a. Report on HRA Community Center Project Mr. Kondrick stated that what is being planned for the Center City Redevelopment area is a 30,000 sq. ft, office building and a medical clinic adjacent to City Hall, Ne stated one of the things that happens as a result of that is the removal of Eisenhower Park, which has a commemorative monument which was installed by the VFW. Dr. Boudreau stated he is meeting with the VFW on Friday morning to discuss a new location for the monument. He stated he will be suggesting the south side of Moore Lake where the flagpole is Tocated. Ms. Seeger expressed concern about the removal of the 6eautiful trees in Eisenhower Park. Dr. Boudreau stated that al] the smaller trees will be removed and relocated. He stated if Ms. Seeger or any of the other Comnission members had any questions or concerns, they should contact Mr, Boardman, City Planner. 3. NEW BUSINESS: a. Pro�osed Surrmer Acti vi ty Fee Schedul e Mr. Kirk stated they have two differant types of softball leagues in the City of Fridley: (1) the state registered leaques--affiliated with the state-wide athletic program and the teams that win in Fridley in the play- offs have the o portunity to go on to regional, district, and state competition; (2� the fun leagues--those teams not interested in the high competition, just want to play in Fridley. Dr. Boudreau stated each team gives the City a$100 deposit to ensure they are an eligibie team. That deposit is returned at the end of the year if the team has not broken any rules and has fulfilled their schedule. He stated most other communities do this same thing. Mr, Kirk stated the following is the proposed summer activity fee schedule: boftball State registered leagues $225/team ($200 last yr.) Fun leagues 200/team ($180 last yr.) Pla,�qroand Pro�ram - 7-week program (119 activity hrs.) $18/individual, $30 maximum/family i. PARKS & RELREA7ION COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 6 1982 PAGE 5 Tiny Tots - 42 activity hrs. $11/individual, $20 maximumlfamily Day Nature Camp Grades 1-2 Grades 3-4 Grades 5-6 Grades 7-8-9 $ 8.50jindividual, 16.00/individual, 18.00/individual, 15.00/individual, T-Ball - 8 wk. program Ages 6-7-8 Yauth Gymnastics $15/individual $]2/individual Jr. & Sr, Hiqh Gymnastics $22/individuai $15 maximum/family $30 maximum/family $30 maximum/fiamily $25 maximum/family Dr. Boudreau stated they have some established criteria be which they set these fees: 1. number of hrs. of leadership and leader's salary 2, supplies and materials 3. add about 14% for administration fee 4. transportation 5, special awards, special literature or materials Dr, Boudreau stated, in this way, they have a pretty good idea of what the program is going to cost them, and then they try to offset part of that so the fees are very competitive and compatible to the other playground programs in the metro area. Dr. Boudreau stated that, with softball, they take the state registratian fee, the cast of the umpires, the number of games, number of softba7ls that will be used, administration fee, trophies, in order to come up with the fees. He stated softball was the one activity that comes closest to being a self-sustaining activity. COUNCIL SUMMER�ACT TO UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYB� CHAZRPERSON.KONDRICK DECLARED TAE MOTION CRRRIED UNANZMOUSLY. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 6, 1982 PA6E 6 b. Sunday Softball League Mr. Kirk stated, as he had told the Comnission earlier, they stili have twelve men's teams on a waiting list. He stated he has explained to them that there are no more fields available, Mr. Kirk stated Sunday night is the only night they have available when they are not utilizing the fields. He stated he told the twelve teams that they were exploring the possibility of a Sunday night league, and asked them if they would play if there was a Sunday night league. He stated that out of the twelve teams, eight said "yes". He stated he would guess they would probably have ten teams out of the twelve on a Sunday night league. Mr. Kirk stated they are now bringing this to the Commission for approval. The Comnission is aware of the parking prob7ems and.the conditions at Commons Park. This would be a one-year program at Commons, although a Sunday night league may be something they wi17 want to continue in the future, ;fi the demand is there. Dr. Boudreau stated the hours would not be late. They are talking about starting the games at 5-5:30 and ending at 8-8:30 p.m. They could even divide the teams between Co�nons and Locke Park, if the Commission desired that. Mr. Kondrick stated he did not have a probiem witfi a Sunday night league as long as the hours are early. MOTION BY MS. SCHREINER SECONDED BY MS. SEEGER� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY CDUNCIL THE�APPROVRL�OF�R SUNDRY�NIGHT�LE'AGUE�FROM'Si00=8i00�P.M, WITH A MAXZMUM OF�12�TEAMS.�- UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE� CHAIRPERSON KONDRICX DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY.� c. Softball Tournament Requests Dr. Boudreau stated they again have the request from the Fridl�y Tiger Hockey Booster Club for the use of Commons 2,3,4, and 5 for a tournament on June 18, 19, 20. Again, this is tying in with 49'er Days. Dr. Boudreau stated this year the Girls Softba7l Division of the FYSA is requesting the use of Commons 2, 3, and 4 softba]1 fields for an invitationai softball tournament on July 9-11 with an alternative date of July 16-78 in case of rain-out. He stated this is a new request. Dr. Boudreau stated he would recommend the Commission approve both these requests. � PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETTNG APRIC 6 1982 PAGE 7 M02ION BY MS. SEEGER� SBCONDED BY MS. SCHREINER� TO RPPROVE THE REQUEST FROM THE FRIDLEY 2'IGER HOCKEY BOOSTER CLUB FOR A SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT ON JUNE 28-20 AND THE REQUEST FROM THE GIRLS� SOFTBALL DIVISION OF THS FYSA FOR A SOFTBRLL TOURNAMENT ON JULY 9-1I (JULY I6-28 IF PREVIOUS DATES RAINED WT). � ' UPON A VOTCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANSMOUSLY. d. Board & Commission Meeting Dr, Boudreau stated he had received a call from Dick Jorgenson, Executive Secretary of the Minnesota Recreational Park Association,informing him of a Board & Commission meetin9 on Sat., April 17, at Van Cleeve Park from 9:30 - 12:00 noon. This will be an educationa]-type session. He stated any Commission members interested in attending should contact him by Friday, April 9. e. Policy Recommendation Dr. Boudreau stated he has received a ca11 from Mrs. Chris Lian from the Mrs. Jaycees. The Mrs. Jaycees want to hold an "outstanding young adult award" ceremony to recognize the outstanding young adult in the community. They would like to utilize the 5pringbrook Nature Center facility. Dr. Boudreau stated the unwritten policy he and Mr, St. Clair have been following is that the Springbrook Nature Center facility was built as a nature interpretive center. They do appreciate the help they have received from everyone, but they do not want to open up the nature center facility as a public meeting place. Besides the drain on staff to open it up in the evening for meetings, they do not think the purpose of ineetings held in the interpretive center is in keeping with why the facility was built. Dr. Boudreau stated they would like the Cormnission`s opinions and recommendations on how far they should go, if anywhere, with this type of thing. Does the Comnission wish to open the center up to groups far meetings? If so, how does Staff accomplish it? What groups are eligible? What kind of guidelines should they develop? Mr. St. Clair stated the way they are handling it right now is if someone calls up and wants to have a meeting at the nature center as a part of the nature center's program, they have altowed that. But, these evening programs and meetings from a staff standpoint is almost "gratis", because it is not part of their regular working day. He stated they are having quite a number of groups calling and wanting to meet at the center. He stated they would also like to keep evenings open for special programs. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 6, 1982 PAGE 8 Mr. Kondrick stated that in one way, he kind of liked the idea of having meetings at the nature center in the respect that it wouid give the nature center more exposure. However, he did not see how they had the money or the staff to handle that kind of thing now--possibly in the future. Ms. Seeger stated the nature center is now open an weekends and the staff are alternating weekends in service to the community. She stated she agreed with the discretion Mr. St. Clair has used in the past. The facility reaily ought to be used with the intention that it is a nature center and not just simply a building. There are other public buildings in the City that are avaiiable for meetings and ceremonies, Dr. Boudreau stated his philosophy would still be that this is a nature center intended for nature interpretive-type of things. Once they open it up as just another meeting area in the City of Fridley, they would be defeating the purpose for which a 1ot of people put a lot of hours and hard work into building a nature interpretive center, He would hate to see that happen. The Cornnission members were in agreement with this philosophy that the facility should not be made available to non-nature oriented meetings or groups. For those situations that are questionable, they felt comfortable with leaving it up to the Staff's discretion. Ms. Schreiner stated she could see the need for a good written policy on this. Dr. Boudreau stated now that the nature center is open and most of the things inside are done, they do need to come up with some policies for hours in the park (also exceptions to those hours), building use, program - commitment, etc. Staff will be presenting these policies to the Commission piece by piece over the sumener trying to put it all together. He stated he and Mr. St. Clair would appreciate any input the Comnission members might have, Chairperson Kondrick declared a ten-minute recess at 9:35 p.m. f. Oevelopment Plan - Springbrook Nature Center = Siah St. Clair Mr. St. Clair handed out copies of the "Springbrook Nature Center Preliminary Master Development Pian, April 7482". He reviewed the plan with the Commission members. Mr. St. Clair stated they will be putting together a priority list of things that are needed so they can plan a capital improvement program for the next five yedrs. ✓ PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 6 1982 PAGE 9 Mr, St. Clair stated the major thing they are looking at right now is the pond deve7opment at Springbrook. In looking at the animal and plant life and trying to maximize their diversity over the next lOQ years, the one thing that is really lacking within the park is a permanent open bady of water. He stated the ponding has changed drastically in the last four years. He stated the beavers are on their way out of the park. The longest boardwalk is practically over dry land now, the short board- walk is partially under water because the beavers raised their dam, and there are sections completely under water. Mr. St. Clair stated they need a permanent open body of water that will not fluctuate so they can deve7op a boardwalk and trail system that isn't going to need changing every 2-3 years. He stated they have been working on developing a plan for this for quite some time. He stated he has taken an aerial phota of the nature center that was taken in 1975 or 1976 when the beavers had their main dam. He took the area wfiere the open water was, drew a line around it, and said that was the kind of area they would like to have as a permanent open body of water. They then drew up a plan for an open body of water to be placed there. Mr. St. Clair stated that as part of this plan, the Engineering Dept. hired a company to do soil borings to determine how far down the peat goes. One of the concerns they have is to make sure they do not "pull the plug" and end up going down 6eyond the seal and draining all the water out. One thing they discovered from ihe soil borings is that there is a clay material under the peat. Mr. St. Clair stated they are still working on a plan that will work best for them. Another concern is that the impact is not going to be heavy on the other parts of the site. A main part of the interest is to leave the marsh areas as they are. Mr. St. Clair stated right now he is meeting with various people--a representative fran the Minnesota Water Fowl Association; Dr. Breckrenridge; someone from the Department of Natural Resources; and someone from the Fish & Wildlife Service, to try to come up with what is best going to fit this site fran an interpretive standpoint, as well as a wildlife standpoint. Mr. St. Clair stated this is the highest priority in the capital improve- ment projects right now and is getting most of his attention in trying to plan for the future. Dr. Boudreau stated they would like the Commissi�n's initial reaction on what they are proposing as it will help guide the capital outlay budget. Y PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 6, 1982 PAGE 10 The Commission members agreed they did not want to encourage picnicing at the nature center--that there be just an area where schooi chilGren and people visiting the center over a lunch period can eat their lunch. They would caution against any further expansion of the picnic area. Ms. Schreiner stated she could see the immediate need for signs, even if they are temporary signs, for "no pets" and "no picking and collecting". She felt these were two important areas that were being abused. Ms. 5eeger stated that, regarding the pond development, the Springbrook Board discussed this in depth. It was the concensus of the Springbrook Board to go along with the area development, but made the statement they did not want it "too developed". She would go along with that recommendation and concern. Mr. St. Clair stated that right now, they are just l�ooking at the concept of doing pond development, because they are not at the point of having actual drawings of what they want done. Ms. Schreiner stated it seemed to her to be one of the top priorities for the nature center. The Commission members concurred with the concept of pond development at the Springbrook Nature Center. ADJOURNMENT: Chairperson Kondrick declared the April 6, 1982, Parks & Recreation Comnission meeting adjourned at 11:20 p,m. Respectful]y submR� �-r Lynn Saba Recording Secretary � ` �G'r�'Ui�/�ca�.N �Y�GI-�--� �l/ ��a� �'/i / S� z �t �s1� ' "L "^. G"l�y� �� '��`"�°_. �� �� ,�.�� �i�l �,eov� /�� �� ( S ., , �J� l�� � ` �.�� � /�1 d�� y jCNrf,�D i /7�36 !�//� „✓a�,.1f`7�� /l/E�/s il-�s �, g i��.��$.. ��, h� s-s�y 3 Z. iyoo .��-�"�.����.� � �9a� t�t�(,�'� f/t/. �. /�PGS hl�V� /�� � ,�� ��oo � �� � .�� f� i��'�c-��— G�3? Ti n�ala�� Y�Fv. �d.rv y �`�-P� i �itl���eer+� �a.u�uG�ier✓�`,�o /yl�+����, �'strc. n� . �J� b.�� ���s�f'��/,cl/,f� %�1erX�/r�aN�c �.or��vv�uT� �e� u h�7�� l2i�c�ia y�� 923 /zs � [.u.�� ,��G T�' 1 u / �c/E' /1l/�, �tC� - ��i�. /�dE N�. .rs'S!s2 ; `; � � �' CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 21, 1982 CALL TD ORDER: � Chairwoman Schnabel called the April 21, 1982, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:34 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Ms. Schnabel, Mr. Oquist, Ms. Gabel, Mr. Svanda, Mr. Kondrick, Ms, van Dan, Mr. Saba Members Absent: Nane Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner Lloyd Pew, 1736 Hollywood Ave, N.E., Mpls. Mrs. Louis Sandusky, 181 Sylvan Lane N.E, Vern Wilcox, 1400 First Bank Place East Jim Grover, 6950 France Ave. So, Bob Ferris, 1600 First Bank Place East John Luce, 6437 Tingdale Ave., Edina Gary M. Weber, 923 - 125th Lane N.E. Richard Weispfenning, 1310 - 69th Ave. N.E. APPROVAL OF APRIL 4, 1982, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR, SABA� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO APPROVE TXE APRIL 4� 1982� PLANNING COI+IMISSZON MINUTES. Ms. Schnabel stated that on page 2, paragraph 2, 4th line, the word "parlour" should be inserted after "massage". UPON A VOICE VOTE, RLL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED SHE MINUTES APPROVED AS AMENDED. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #82-03, BY FIRST BANK SYSTEM, VERN WILCOX: o a ow a 30 x 0 site in Menar s par ing ot to e used for an automatic teller machine in an enclosed building, Per Section 205.101, 3, I, of the Fridley City Code, on part of Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision No. 94, the same being 5351. Centra7 Ave. N.E. MOTION BY MS. VAN DRN� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK� TO OPEN THE POBLIC HEARING ON SP #82-03 BY FIRST BANK SYSTEM� VERN WILCOX. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7;37 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 21, 1982 PAGE 2 Mr. Boardman stated that because the automatic teller machine would be located in Menards' parking lot and is a lease structure that is not part of the main structure, it requires a special use permit. The petitioners are proposing that the bank site be located on an island area where the service drives goes around the front by the Menards' sign. This is a free-standing building where people will park their cars, gei out of their cars, and go into the building. There will be a sidewalk and landscaping around the whole structure. The door faces south. He stated the people from first Bank System were at the meeting to answer questions. Mr. Boardman stated that at the last meeting, the Planning Commission approved a nursery to be set up in the Menards' parking lot. He stated the City Council did approve it with the stipulation that those people work with City Staff in locating the lot where there would be the least amount of conf7ict. The Planning Commission had suggested the 7ocation in the southwest corner of the parking 7ot. Mr. Vern Wilcox, 1400 First Bank Place East, Mpls., stated he is the Assistant Vice President of First Bank System in charge of the Construction Division. Also at the meeting-Mr. Robert Ferris, Assistant Vice President of First Bank System in charge of the Electronic Banking Division and Mr. Jim Grover, an architect with Gene Hickey & Associates. Mr. Wilcox passed out a sheet giving a general overview of the services provided out of this building. Basically, it is an electronic banking machine that is capable of dispensing cash, handling deposits, checking account balances--basica7ly what a teller function would be in a regular bank. These machines are being cosponsored with First Bank System for the 17 First Bank System banks in the metropolitan area. In the future, these machines will have the capability of being shared with other banks, savings and loan unions, and financial institutions. Mr. Wilcox stated it is a complete steel frame building with wood siding around three sides and glass around the vestibule. The unit is completely protected from a security standpoint by cameras and alarm systems. On the front door, there is a small card access, and the same plastic card that activates the machine will also activate the front door. The unit on the top is an all aluminum facia, and there are four signs located on the unit, one on each side. Mr. Wilcox stated they will be locating ten of these units in the Twin Cities area and the units will be serviced on a daily basis. They are presently taking about five contracts for maintenance of landscaping, lighting, general cleaning of the building, filling the machines with cash, iaking deposits out, and servicing the mechanical functions. He stated they have been operating in the 5-state area for about 50 years, and they are very concerned about maintenance and do not want these things to be run down, They have a pretty good reputation for good maintenance. Ms. Schnabel asked if there were any Fastbank Services in existence now in the Twin Cities area. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 21, 1982 PAGE 3 Mr. Wilcox stated there was not, because this is a fairly new concept. The cash machine concept is one they have worked with for about 4-5 years. They have them located in their banks where they are ca7led "24 Hr. First Banks". They are also in a few supermarkets throughout the Twin Cities area and other states and are labeled as "Fast Banks". Mr. Wilcox stated they now have permission from three other communities to locate these buildings--Bloomington, Minneapolis at 53rd & Minnehaha, and Apple Valley. Fridley is the fourth. They are currently negotiating with Roseville and St. Louis Park. Mr. Oquist asked about parking and what they anticipaie as a customer volume on a daily basis. He was concerned about sufficient parking, particularly during the times when Menards is busy, and the traffic flow out of the intersection. Mr. Wilcox stated that with the cash machine concept, most of their volume will be after hours. Generally, about 65% of their transactions occur from 6:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. when banks are closed. They are estimating a maximum of 1,000 trans- actions per month when the machine has reached its full potential, and that is 5-7 years from now. Mr. Wilcox stated their corporation, First Bank System, is probably one of the very few that can afford to get into this kind of thing. It is very expensive, and he did not visualize very many banks or savings and loan operations getting these kinds of systems. Those banks will be buyirg transaction time from them. Ms. van Dan asked about security. 7his is a rather dark area for a bank to be located. Mr. Wilcox stated there are security lights located in the soffit that are designed to shine down around the building, so no one can linger around the building. On the underside of the ceiling, there are flourescent lights that 7ight up the entire vestibule on the inside. There'.is a video camera going 24 hrs. inside the building. There are alarms throughout the bui7ding that connect to a central station in St. Paul. There is also a telephone inside that wi71 connect anyone to the same security siation in St. Paul. Ms. Schnabel asked about vandalism. Mr. Wilcox stated they have operated the cash machine network in the Twin Cities area for about 4-5 years, and they have had no serious problems with vandalism or anyone being attacked. Mr. Saba asked if they had looked at the parkinq situation and access to that area of the parking lot during rush hour traffic. Mr. Wilcox stated they had, and they were not concerned with rush hour, because their volume has been during the non-rush hour periods. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL Z1, 1982 PAGE 4 Ms, Schnabel asked how they selected this site. Mr. Wilcox stated they did a marketing study of the entire Twin Cities area. Thirty-five percent of the population in the Twin Cities area are First Bank customers, so they tried to identify those areas in the Twin Cities where they felt they were not servicin9 their customers adequately. He stated they draw a lot of customer base from this area, and this site came up as one possible site location. Mr. Robert Ferris stated their #1 criteria is accessibility and visibility. By law, they must be located in a retail premise or a shopping ma]1 or adjoining mall area. When looking at the metropolitan area, the 694 area in this quadrant was not served by this type of 6anking concept as well as it should be. Once in that quadrant, they looked for accessibility and visibility. Menards was a willing landlord, and they felt it was more serviceable and visible than the area down by Target, which was also a possible site. Ms. Gabel asked about the lease arrangement with Menards. Mr. Ferris stated it is a 3-year lease with two options of three more years each, for a total of nine years. He stated they feel it will take three years to build a presence in the market, If, after three years, they feel it is not doing the job, they would probably take it out. Mr. Wilcox stated the building is completely portable. It is manufactured in New Mexico, brought here in one piece, and put down on a permanent foundation. If something should happen and they would want to switch locations, they can pick up the building and relocate it. Ms, Gabel asked when they expected the Firstbank Service to be oeprational. Mr. Wilcox stated that, assuming it is approved by the Planning Commission and City Counci3, they would probably have it operational by the middle of June. Mr. Boardman asked what kind of utility service they would need. Mr. Wilcox stated their network lines are primarily data lines and communication lines. They need a telephone connection and an electrical connection. They have met with Northwestern Bell and will be meeting with NSP. All the lines will be underground, Mr. Wilcox stated the building is accessible to the handicapped. They have an agreement with Menards to have two reserved parking stalls, but he did not think they needed to earmark one of the stalls for handicapped. He stated they do not anticipate more than two people in the building at one time. MOTION BY �R. OQUIST� SECONDED BY MS, GABEL� TO CLOSE�THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SP #82-03 BY FIRST BANK SYSTEM. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLSC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:09 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 21, 1982 PAGE 5 Mr. Oquist stated he did not see any problem with this building. It will be maintained well, and he did not think the traffic flow would be a problem, Ms. Gabel sxated she was a little concerned ahout traffic f7ow, because evenings and weekends are peak times for that area and intersection, Ms. Schnabel stated she also shared Ms. Gabel's concerns about traffic, Each time something is added to this area, a little more traffic is added. Ms. Ga6e1 stated there was probably a need for this type of banking system, and she had a problem with denying this request when at the last meeting they approved something that was temporary. This system seems fairly well established and will probably stay there. MOTION BY MR. OQUIST� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRTCK� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCTL RPPROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT� SP �82-03, BY FIRSS BRNK SYSTEM, VERN WILCOX, TO ALLOW A 30' X 40' SITE IN MENJ3RDS` PARKING LOT TO BE USED FOR AN AUTOMASIC TELLER MACHINE IN AN ENCIASED BUILDING� PER SECTION 205.101� 3� I� OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, ON PART OF LOT 9, AUDITOR'S SUBDIV25ION NO. 94, THE SAME BEING 5351 CENTRRL RVENUE N,E. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMRN SCHNABE'L DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated SP #82-03 was recommended to City Council for approval and would go to City Council on May 3. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #82-04, MEDTRONIC, GARY WEBER: Per Section 205. 31, 3, A, , of the Fri ey City Co e, to a ow the installation of a 158' radio communications antenna, on Parcel 660Q, located in the South Half of Section 12, the same being 6972 Central Avenue N.E. MOTION BY MR, OQUIST� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRZCK� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SP �82-04 BY MEDTRONIC� GARY WEBER. UPON A VOICE VOTE� RLL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN RT 8:26 P.M, Mr. Boardman stated Medtronic is located off 69th and Old Central. The request is to put up a radio communications antenna. In the City Code under M Districts, a special use permit is required for microwave or transmission towers. This is not really a transmission tower, but it is for transmitting--a kind of radia tower. As far as meeting the comprehensive p7an as far as air space, there are no problems as long as a tower is below the 200 ft. level. Mr. Boardman stated representatives from Medtronic were at the meeting to answer any questions. Mr. Gary Weber stated he is Medtronic's Corporate Security Manager. He stated the tower is part of a communications system very similar to what po7ice departments use. It is a UHF frequency. What they propose to use it for is to dispatch � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING; APRIL 21, 1982 PAGE 6 emergency response teams in their facilities. These teams are trained to deal with fire, personal injury, medical cases, and severe medical cases, such as heart attacks. They would use the system to contact these people and have them respond to the area and take care of the emergency until outside professional people could arrive. In addition, they need it for security officers who are on patrol in the facilities. This particular antenna would a71ow them to be in contact with the security offices and emergency response teams, not only on this site, but in their seven other sites. He stated that once the new building is completed and fully occupied, they wi17 have 2,50o people on site, so they are very concerned about the safety of those people. Mr. Oquist asked if the operation proposed for this antenna wou7d cause any neighborhood radio interference, Mr. John Luce stated he is the engineering consultant for Medtronic. He stated the question of radio frequency interference was one which Medtronic was very concerned abou�. They have done some radio frequency studies to make sure they do not create intermodulation, harmonics, and that kind of thing. This is relatively a low powered device and is quite comparable at the antenna to a 60 watt light bult, He stated the FCC has certified this type of equipment. There is a lot of history to go on with these towers, and they do not anticipate any problems. Mr. Richard Weispfenning, 1310 - 69th Ave, N.E., stated he is a close neighbor to Medtronic. He stated he was quite aware of the way Medtronic has designed their building on that location. It is very well iniegrated into that setting which is fairly natural. He wondered if there were any special construction techniques or other considerations when specifying the location of that tower so it blends in the best it can with that natural setting. Mr. Weber stated the reason they selected this location was to hide the antenna as much as possible. Mr. Luce stated the tower is made of galvanized steel, so it has a silver look with a dull finish. He stated they cannot hide a radio tower, but it is going to be far less obvious than the power transmission 9ines that are 100 yards to the north. MOTION BY MS, GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO CIASE.THE PUBLIC NEARING ON SP 1182-04 BY MEDTRONIC. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED RT 8:45 P.M. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF 5PECIAL USE PERMIT� 5P #82-04,.MEDTRONIC, GARY WESE'R, PE'R 5ECTION 205.I32� 3� A� (7)� OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE� TO ALLOW THE TNSTALLATSON OF A Z58' RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ANTENNA, ON PARCEL 6600, LOCATED IN THE SOUTH XALF OF SECTION Z2, THE SAME BEING 6972 CEN2RRL AVENUE�N.E. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 21, 1982 PAGE 7 Mr, Kondrick stated he felt this was well planned and thought out by Medtronic. Mr, Saba stated the whole purpose of this antenna is for the safety and the welfare of the Medtronic employees. UPON R VOICE VOTE, ALL vOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNRBEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated SP #82-04 was recommended to City Council for approval and would go to City Council on May 3. 3. RECEIVE APRIL 1 1982 HUMAN RESOJRCES COMMISSION MINUTES: �MOTION BY MS. VAN DAN� SECOt7DED BY MR. KONDRICX, TO RECEIVE THE RPRIL 1� Z982, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES. Ms, van Dan stated the b�ggest thing the Commission is involved in right now is the accessibility survey. The Accessibility Project Committee has compiled the survey form. A cover letter has been written by the Mayor and the chair- person of the project conmittee has written a letter. These letters will go with the survey forms to 175 facilities. She stated this committee is a very active committee. Ms. Schnabel stated that before this project committee has finished this project, the Planning Co�nission should, in some way, express their appreciation. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4. RECEIVE APRII 8, 1982, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORI7Y MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. SABR� TD RECESVE SHE APRIL 8� 1982� HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE� CHASRWOMAN SCHNASEL DBCLARED THE MOTSON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � 5. RECEIVE APRIL l3, 1982, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTIDN BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO RECESVE TNE APRIL 23, 2982, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTZON CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. RECEIVE APRIL 6, 1982, PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY 1�2, KONDRSCK� SECONDED BY MR, SABA, TO RECEIVE THE APRIL 6� 2982� PARKS & RECREATION CQMMISS70N.MINUPE5. UPON R VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLFiRED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANSMOUSLY. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 21, 1982 PAGE 9 ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. OQUIST� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK� TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A VDICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMRN SCHNABEL�DECLARED THE APRIL 2Z� I982� PLANNING COMMI5SION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:35 P.M. Respectfully sutim'tted, ) � � yn Saba Recording Secretary