The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 07/14/1982 - 6779City of Fridley AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY JU6Y 14, 1982 CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: JUNE 23, 1982 1. N7�7 A SPECi PtKMlI, SP #tiL-Utf, tiY JHMtJ H. I;KUSJ: Y21' J2Ct1011 CUb.Ubl, [, A, of the Fridley City Code, to allow the construction of a second accessory building, a 22' x 24' attached garage on Lot 4, Block 1, Irene Henry Addition, the same 6eing 627_1 Jackson Street N.E. (Variance 9ranted 6�15l82,.subject to approval of SUP) 2. VACATION REQUEST: .SAV #82-01, BY�,S !� R INVESTMANT COMPANY: Vacate that'portion of unused right-of-way adjacent to the west side of Lots 13, 14 and 15, Block 4, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville, (highway turn-back), to allow the co�l5truction of a 4-plex, the same being 560� 4th Street N.E. (Appeals Commission recommended approval of variance on June 29, 1982) 3. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #82-04, BY A. 05CAR CARLSON: Split Split off the 4Jesterly 8 feet of the vacated alley adjacent to Lots 20, 21 and 22, Block 7 Onaway, and add it to the Easterly 8 feet of vacated alley adjacent to Lots 5, 6, and 7, Block 7, Onaway, the same being 7753 Beech Street and 7752-56 Elm Street N.E. 4. RECEIVE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES: JUNE 15, 1982 5 � 7 RECEIVE HOUSIN6 & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: JUNE 17, 1982_ RECEIVE ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES: JUNE 22, 1982 RECEIVE APPEALS CO�AP1ISSIaN MINUTES: JUNE 29, 1982 8. RECEIUE HUMAN RESOURCES MIKUTES: JULY 1, 1982 ;" A. See motion to Council on funding of Service Organizations 9. OTHER BUSINESS: ADJOURNMENT: � % 7� Y ,P� �� -�°�l �'�'�' i d� 7:30 P.M. PAGES IQ: 7 -23 24 - 28 25 - 34 SLUE WHITE ORCHID YELLOW SALMON /" ` — C1TY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 23, 1982 CALL TO ORDER: Chairwoman Schnabel called the June 23, 1982, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. R�LL CALL: Members Present: Ms. Schnabel, Mr. Saba, Ms. Gabel, Mr. Svanda, Mr, Oquist, Mr, Kondrick, Ms, van Dan Members Absent: None Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner Patricia Hardel, 332 - 64th Ave. N.E. Steven Hardel, 336 - 64th Ave. N.E. Thomas F. Ryan, 6389 University Ave. N.E. APPROVAL OF JUNE 9, 1982, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY hIIt. KONDRICX� SECONDED BY AIIt. OQUIST� TO APPROVE THE JUNE 9, I982, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RS WRITTEN. DPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHRIRWOMRN SCXNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNRNZMOUSLY. 1. PUBLIC E PERMIT UtKHW HHKIMNN: F'2Y' SeCt10I1 'LUb.l31, 3, A� (2 , t0 a on the Nort 2 0 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Section 3, the same being 8290 Main Street N.E. SP #82-07 BY ow a�n o auction Northeast Ouarter of Mr. Boardman stated the People's Auction has moved out of Fridley to a new location, and the.special use permit request has been witfidrawn by request of the petitioner, Mr. Hartman, 2. #82-01. BY THE FRID Muinurcii�: vac:dtie 4tin �zreez oeLween niocKS 4 ana 5, ana tne iz toot a e11 y in Block 4, Ree's Addition to Fridley Park. (Block 5 alley vacated Ordinance 208) (balance of streets and alleys from Mississippi to 64th Avenue vacated February 23, 1953, in Book 292, Page 219, Anoka County Records). Mr. Boardman stated this it�n was continued from the last meeting. He stated he has talked to the people who were in the audience at the June 9th meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 23, 1982 PAGE 3 Mr. Boardman stated he thought it shou7d be a stipulatian of the Planning Comnission that there will be no notification of the vacations until the HRA acquires and owns the properties. He stated the City Councilwqll have the public hearing on July 12, and they will have the first and second readings some time after that. The City Council will hold up on the pub7ishing of the notice of vacation. The ordinance cannot go into effect until after publication in the paper. Fifteen days after the notification, the vacation goes into effect. Mr, Boardman stated he had talked to Mr. Harvey Peterson, legal counsel for Mr. Ryan, Mr. Peterson had suggested that as part of the vacation, the HRA or City Council have something in writing that says the alley will not be vacated until the HRA either acquires or takes an acquisition on the property, There- fore, the property owners would have ful7 use of the alley, and it would not impede their access to their properties: Mr. Boardman stated he would be open, based on legal opinion from the City Attorney, to agreements for access, if agreements are necessary. Mr. Ryan stated he would like some kind of written agreement. Mr. Steve Hardel stated that besides guaranteeing his access to his garage, he would also like a guarantee that his garage is going to be able to remain open. With the plan to put in sewer and water and reroute 64th Ave., if he has no access to his front door, he has no business, Mr. Boardman stated what will affect Mr. Hardel's business the most is the con- struction that will be going on to put in a new 4th Street. He stated they will have to work with the contractors on this to maintain an opening for access to Mr. Hardel's garage. Mr. Ryan stated he has been in fridley for 22 years and has bui7t up a pretty good business. He just could not understand how somebody else in another business could come into the City of Fridley, say they want to build a clinic, choose whatever property they want, and then the existing buildings have to come down. It seemed to him that if someone wants to buy his property, that person/persons should come to him persona7ly. Ms. Schnabel stated the members of the Planning Commission were very sympathetic to Mr. Ryan's concerns and what he is going through. She explained that one thing that happened several years ago was the City decided it needed to upgrade tfie "downtown Fridley", the most identifiable area being what is now the Center City area. In the process, because things were financially a lot better at that time, the City re-established the HRA, identified some areas to be developed, and with a broad brush stroke, included a lot of land. Ms. Patty kardel stated it seemed it would have been more feasible to put the clinic in an area where the City already owns the land, instead of acquirRng more to give the clinic this site. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 23, 1982 PAGE 4 Mr. Boardman stated they did show the Columbia Park people all the sites available 5n the City, and Columbia Park Properties selected the site they felt was the best for their business. He stated the clinic is a very stable business, and the City did not have to do a lot of promotion to develop or to maintain that clinic; however, in order to attract commercial/retail/office, they have to have visibility and easy access, so the property to the north of University would be a lot easier to promote for that kind of bnsiness than the property south of City Hall, MOTION BY MR. OQUZST, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICR, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVRL OF VACATION REQUEST� SAV #82-01, BY THE FRIDLEY HOU52NG & REDEI7EIAPMENT AUTHORITY, TO VRCATE 9PH STREET BETWEEN BSACKS 4 AND 5, EXCEPT TXE NORTHERLY I00 FEET� AND THE 12 FOOT ALLEY IN BLOCK 4�.REE'S ADDITION TO FRSDLEY PARK. (BLOCK 5 RLLEY VACATED ORDINRNCE 208) (BALANCE OF STREETS AND ALLEYS FROM MISSISSIPPI TO 64TH AVENUE VACATED FEB. 23� 1953 IN BOOK 292� PAGE 2.Z9, ANOKA COUNTY RECORDS), WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THE VACATION BE PUBLISHED ONLY AS THE HRA RCQUIRES TNE PROPERTY AND THAT� IF LEGALLY ADVISABLE BY THE CITY ATTORUEY� THE HRA ENTER INTO WHATEVER LEGAL AGREEMENTS ARE NECESSARY FOR ACCESS. UPON R VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHRIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated this item would go to City Council for public hearing on Ju1y T2. 3. RECEIVE JUNE 1Q, 1982, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTIDN BY MS. VAN DAN� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL, TD RECEIVE THE JUNE 10� 2982, HUMAN RESDURCES COMMISSION MINUTES. Ms. van Dan stated the accessibility survey has been progressing very well. They have had over a 50% return. She stated the project should be completed by the end of August. Ms. van Dan stated the Cortmission was quite upset when they were informed a few hours prior to their meeting that the City Council had decided not to fund any of the funding requests. The Commission was both angered and annoyed that the City Council had not made this decision earlier because the people took a lot of time to prepare their presentations. It was a7so a waste of the money they have so little of. Ms, van"Dan stated the Commission has decided to continue to review the funding requests and make recommendation to the City Council that they reconsider their decision. She realized the funding requests are much larger than they have been in the past, but she would like the Planning Comnission to know what these requests are: Centra7 Center for Fami] Resources - requesting $5,000. In the past, 27% o eir services ave een provi ed to Fridley residents; whereas, in the past Fridley has only funded 6-7%, so the City has not really offered them that much to start with. PLANNING COMMISSI4N MEETIN6 JUNE 23 1982 PAGE 5 North Suburban Famil Services Center - requesting $3,Q00-6,000. They serve approximate y 0 Fri ey resi ents on a subsidized sliding fee scale. 5outhern Anoka Communit Assistance (SACA} - requesting $2,5D0. They ser� 3 5 ri ey resi ents out o a tota 887 so Frid]ey residents repre- sent almost 50% of the people served. The Alexandra House, Inc. - requesting $3,000. According to their statistics, t ere are women in ridley who are considered battered women, 20 of them have gone to Alexandra House for service. Their question is: Where do the other 310 go? Frid]e Creative Pla Center - requesting $4,000, 64 of the 94 families serve are Fri ey resi ents. Ms. van Dan stated she was sure all of these organizations have gone to as many sources of funding as possible. Ms, van Dan stated the Commission would like to gather all the facts and have 5-6 good reasons why they think the funding requests should be reviewed. They are also reviewing the 1983 city budget very carefully. Some of the commissioners _ feel priorities may be high in certain areas, and may6e they can make some recommendations regarding the budget. Mr. Svanda stated he thought that rather than cutting the funding out entire7y, the City Council should have looked at a gradual reduction. Cutting off those funds so abruptly could have a gross impact on the people wfio were getting that funding, Mr. Oquist stated he did not know how the City Council could make such a decision like this without first sitting down and reviewing the city budget. How can they make priarities until they see what all the priorities are? Ms. van Dan stated she, Mr. Treuenfels, and Mr. Goodspeed attended the State Department of Human Right's No-Fault Grivance Procedure training session on June 19 at City Hall. She stated that if and when the City decides they would like to carry on with this program, the three canmissioners are now certified to hear grievances. UPON A VOICE VOTS� ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MINUTE5 RECESVED. MOTION BY MS. GRBEL� SECONDED BY MR. SVANDR� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL THRT THEY TAICE A LOOK AT THE FOLLOWING FSGURES SHOWING HOW THESE DIFFERENT ORGANIZA— TIONS SERVfi THE CITIZENS OF FRIDLEY� AND TO RECOMMEND THE CITY COUNCIL RECONSIDER TXEIR DSCISION TO TERMINATE ALL FURDIeYG TO SBRVICE�ORGANIZATIQNS UNTIL THEY COME TO THE ACTUAL BUDGET Rfi9IEW PROCESS. CENTRAL CENTER FOR FAMILY RE50URCE5 — REQUESTING $5�000= 27� OF THEIR SERVICES PROVIDED TO FRIDLEY RESIDENTS, FRSDLEY HAS ONLY FUNDED 6-7�. PLANNING COMMTSSION MEETING, JUNE 23, 1982 PAGE 6 NORTH SUBURBAN�FRMILY�SERVZCES CENTER - REQUESTING $3�000-6�OOOt SERVE. APPROX. 120 FRIDLEY RESIDENT5 ON A SUBSIDIZED SLSDING FEE SCALE. � SWTXERN ANOKA COMMUNTTY ASSISTANCE (SACAJ - REQUESTING $2�500f SERVED 385 FRIDLEY RESIDENTS OUT OF A TOTAL 887. THE ALEXANDRA HOUSE, INC. - REQUESTING $3,000; OUT OF 330 BATTERED WOMEN IN FRIDLEY� 20 XAVE GONE TO ALEXRNDRA HOUSE, WHERE DfJ THE OTHER 3I0 GO? FRIDLEY CREATSVE PLAY CENTER - REQUESTING $4�000; 64 OF THE 94 FAMI.LIES SERVED Al2E FRIDLEY RESIDENTS. UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRWOMAN SCHAABEL DECLARED TXE MOTZON CARRZED UNANSMOUSLY. 5. RECEIVE JUNE 15, 1982, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. GRB$L, SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO RECEIVE THE JUNE 15� 1982� APPEALS COM,NISSION MZNUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CNASRWOMAN SCHAAB�L DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANZMDUSLY. 6. RECEIVE JUNE 1, 1982, PARKS & RECREATION CaMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MS. VAN DRN� TO RECEIVE THE JUNE I, 1982� PARKS S RECREATION COMMISSSON MINUTES. UPON R VOICE VOTE� RLL VOTING AYE� CHRIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLRRED THE MOTIDN CARFZIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. ELECTION OF PLANNING CDMMISSfON VICE-CHAIRPER50N FOR 1982-83: Chairwoman Schnabel declared the nominations open for vice-chairperson. MOTION BY MS. 6ABEL� SECONDED BY.lgt. KONDRICK� TO RE-NOMINRTE LEROY OQUIST FOR VICE-CXASRPERSON. MOTION BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. SRBA� TO CAST A UNANIMOUS VOTE FOR LEROY OQU7ST AS VZCE-CNRIRPERSON OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOT2 1982-83, UPON R VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. OQUIST� SECONDED BY hII2. KONDRICK� TO ADJOURN TNE MEETING. UPON R VDICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYS� CHAIRWOMRN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE JUNE 23� 1982� PLANNING COMPf2SSION MEETING RDJOURNED AT 9:45 P.M. Res ectfully su iitted, i �� Lynne Saba. Recording Secretary � � t� �_ .� �,, . ''� 0 �: CITY DF FAIDLBYi X'-'.".,,.1, 6aa� unnv¢wsmr sava wMt. � sw�o�.�+r. t�. asaae ce,s� s� ��s�: tii.... �_ . _._'-' .. . . _ - � � SueJECT � °'� �r;;`�`• :: � " ��k�Y�'��r SPECIAL �15E PERMIT ° _p8 �.",�g- "�' s .�.-;;,�. r:: , $P � � `=" � . , . NO .� ; ; _ . .,. ; _ - - 3 _ _ :;: < ; ... , `� iTi'..COUNCIL: T< - P.H. REQ'D "', _ �DV1TE NO � CITY COUNCIL: APPROYED,l,DISAPPROYED,_�' DA7E '�`` : NO STIPllLAT10N5: 2�_� r-_: y- t;: f , a;: ` . . ,. < .�, . . .., , .� , � ,_ _ , r_ . ? . :� � - NpME �.�Lyyl�',S` ,c.�, C.. �,�pS�s • FEE � OD RECEIP7 NO S/ STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY (os"�7y cTi9f'.CyC7]� �T N� LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY L or �� t.a� z�1 �.�� Y.e� S'1bo�I i _ S//YCaGGr� - PRESENT ZOI�ING CLASSIFICATION �2-/ fXI5TIN6 USE Of �ROPERTY1P�sT��yir�,e � ACREAGE OF PROPERTY,�,B70�_so_ �'� DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROPOSED TYPE OF USE AND IMPROYEMENT �7p- - g�r� � ,a cz�s.,�,iv �9['.[.�sre.r�. ,�cy�diy6 �,oz�o�d� . Ai.�� ..... .... . . . Nas resent applicant previously sought to rezone, plat. obtain a lot split or ariance or special use permit on the subject site or part of it? -X yes no. a was requested and when? - _ , . . . . _ • _ _ , _ _ (awA --- The undersigned understands that:' (a) A list of all residents and owners of�property within 300 feet must be attached to this application. (b} This application must be signed by alt owners of the property, or an explanation given why this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any defect in the proceedings resutting from the failure to list the oames and addresses ofi all residents and property owners of property in question, belongs to the undersigned. _ A sketch of proposed property and structure must�be drawn and attached, showing the foil.owing: i. North direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on the lot. 3:� Dimensions of property, proposed structure, and front and side setbacks. `.. 4. Street names. 5, Location and nse of adjacent existing buildings (within�300 feet)• - �- 9 � - The undersigned hereby declares that nll the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. �� DATE G- i>- ll SI6NAiURE ` - • A PLICANT ADDRESS 1�2�/ �%P.t�r�n%^c,�T;•�� ' TELEPHONE NO_ 57/-� PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a Publie Hearing of the Planning Comnission of the City of Fridley in the City Ha11 at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, July 14, 1982 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 P.M, for the purpose of: Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP #82-08, by James H. Cross, per Section 205.051, 2, A, of the Fridley City Code, to allow the construction of a second accessory building, a 22 ft. by 24 ft. attached garage, on Lot 4, Block 1, Irene Henry Addition, the same being 6271 Jackson Street N.E. Any and a11 persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. YIR6INIA SCHNABEL CHAIRWOMAN PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: June 30, 1982 July 7, 7982 � J MAILIN6 LIST SP N82-08 3ames Cross Se�ond Accessoey Building Delores J. Lynch 6230 Carol Drive N.E. fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Richard L. Hanson 6220 Carol Drive N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Michael Collins 6216 Carol Drive N.E. Fridley. Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Ctarence Johnson 6218 Carol Orive N.E. Fridley, Mn 55433 Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth Swanson 6214 Carol Drive N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Jeffrey Duerre 6212 Carol Drive N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Stephen Wontor 6206 Carol Drive N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Walter Johnson 6261 Van Buren Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. John Lopicka 6271 Van Buren Street N.E. Fridley> M� 55432 Mr. Stuart �abberpuhl 6281 Yan Buren Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Ne1s A]fredson 6290 Van Buren Street N.E. fridley. Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Robert Sutherland 6280 Van Buren Street N.E. Fridley> Mn 55432 � Planning Commission June 29, 1982 Mr. & Mrs. John Anderson 6270 Uan Buren Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. James Cross 6271 Jackson Street N.E. Mr. & Mrs. Phillip We9linski 6281 Jackson Street N.E. fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Joseph Rystrom 6291 Jackson Street N.E. fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. .Robert Miller 6293 Jackson Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Fridley Senior Nigh School School Dist 1i14 6000 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, Mn 55432 � ...e. . ^ N � � o � � Tror✓- — � \\ � �=u�� _ � � .,au w �i�Zrw m r.�wn ...� ,.� ..� a � t G �. � : K,�, STREET MA.P-CITY OF FRIDLEY o �aa s,ea� 10 [and Pb"ra� ! ' i v r.,�.�„ry,;� 11 �s•Hp�ay "�S Ni. �lu�z. �"`'�'� ENGINEERING, INC. �� Cml btfvaripoi Slhje!!�'066 �� — En9ineers � Surveyors cert'sF�cate o� surve�r Fo:-� J ar,� � � �R, �; �, • � � _ � �: � _ t- o � ' � cwsr�.ve �� ' oe.r.r.yoy � � I � r- . �, I - � N . � 7 � � �. _ �- (: i 1 v .� � � ��,�c , ' ' � ~' � �f!/ / .,.�� ( _..:i — c::: �..� .�,, _ •a, ., -- 6wl�f,, j i�ouyE 1w17 � J�9L! - a --- � , .) � ,� . - :4:.:`�-- ��9rc+L° �4.1�/l>Qi✓�/JiTiJ�Gc/�� _ rl � dl ! � � � � I 4 �_ I -- n /' :, r - +' � � . d c^- R i .� � �� N —i � .._e � L�� -, �,� ;�C � � Ikr�ti�� i��i�4�i �,�� 1 ►�f�'� 0 ti � r _ ,� . i l.no.ca �,r�r.�.� ,.��nna��eTn Zg� T��w�� c�.�, /burby ur!'�'y fbaf Lrirs �s o IFue a+d m+�zcf nPrrsenfohian �'o swry �'!ht ba+.�donirs �'�S;r ab.,e dw:drd 1o�e, nd ��xo/'xh e,�'ad dwd:�s ,1Jivren, sadd/ nsid✓i a+vvorhmm/t .;!'a'rf. frvn r rrse�4 /mid. As sur.ryed 6y mr lhts--- t6j � r: � • ! A.D /l�.. SUB UQBAN ENGlNEEllING , INC. � Fi�rpevs� b Stlrreyor�r� � / y. "L ;�� y r , �. ,�- �--�-�- � �4i r, . �'-� L � F�lL�' �2op� r►c � �L i� � 5 � � , � ,� ,�� ' ��. . j /� ; � % �� ' e�.��ccE� : • • r �, . �� r �./.o ; Ti��' �'%G.c�/Y .� �� z� �ti-� v1 �ti� �� 'G� � �E.- -.L �e�-�v,o,2� �--a:z. �.si��-�4��' �`�/.�: I 7t� .Z3CliG v - ��.��5' c��t:' � G�A�v' 73 e' ("/SQ sq�f'UC��d� �2 u GlJ'E'' il//?ii � is s' c.d��.J ac �� ,� y� �� wo,�,r i,<= �� o�, (�S-6 -!� 3/3 Ci� 77�1/f �v�Tiv : a�r 4 �f'�"C�i.cit _ %!�%� f`�c.'��//l � %�2 C/Uc� /�/�''+' �,�� - ..�. yo� s�o v.�.o �'d c�---�'r�e�:!' . J �r ��, . ti �� :� �� c � o p o 0 �g�h�aa�Dh�� a a�� 'a � � � ��`'ti �� $y��y � � ��o�� . �� `' � o� n . � �� ° � ' �� s � �� y� �� _�.� � �� c �� f � � � ti � � ., �FTM�� y � �oC�� ` ��o �a. � � ��a�� o� �� . � �� a Q �. � �� A�� y'0 � Z 14 �s t � � �d � � � a � �� I � � �� , �� . �� a �� - �� . � � � � � . �� . 0 � . �i I � Z 0 y � � O � f �, 4 i. Z . � N � � A i , . ... , ,: . :.,:; . , ,, �,, ; ,%,�. . �� %' /,� /", %' � i , � ��, ��/ � / / . , ,' ' / � . ' � / / � ,- / .\` . . .,\\\ / / % // k i i','i '�,� �ti . � /. � � , � � ,. �^ / �i; j; � • ^ ! /�j i ///// ' � i � `\ qi� ��\ � /' � / -� /� Y�� / �/:� . ��p.��. ��, � :,��i�� P; ;_/� • , /, '/ �.- \ , - , , ,. � / � �' ; ; �� / . �.\ \ / ,' � / �•' �, �%� �.��/i :� ' "� / ..�� /i /,� / �i "- .: i . . i ,%�� \ / / „ � /�/ j ��,' '� '�. \ \ . \ � \ ,. \\ � �s k �� F` a r A �� J � _ uT 6iN� �r., ��a o.� ST n/. E. �/ j , /� i' � i � � / , / , j- �'. ' j%� ' i ; : i ,� ; : • � �/ , ---i; i v i �., � � ------, eaa t 5°� I �R� .� �I ; `f _�— ♦I �` V \�I i i i � rt � � � i I � 15 �4 � M O \ ` .p n � ��i �2� al � �Q� \ � h�, � Y � � � � �� N � � � ` 0 ��i i � � 3.�. � �- -- � 1 I I I I I I a i I i , I ' s 1 � i L � � I � V � O Q i ` � i�« \\' \-�\':\��, � `' �\ \\\ �. ,' � ,� � � �, ,,, , �.. � . ��. . � * � �. •, . b � q � �� , .,��.. o��y . � �, � � `�, �� . . �� `��' � � �'��`�� y � ��,�� \ \�.,.. ` \ \, . . .,... \ ' . .. V�, •, � � � . � .��\ ,\ � . .\ , . � . �. , . \ . \ , \ � � �� '\'� \ � ��,, � � ` � �� \,�\ � .� � A \ � . � � \ ., � . �,�_ � A',. � . � 3�i •�,.�esr� e.c �r r��vv� -----------� i b � i � v I 0 I � I I � � � o� g� �e � � _ _ _. _ -- _ _ _ __J d � r �ti n �� ^ �� n (� 2 0 1� 1� � � N/'4LL �CA71/Nb - /lX�l /b �i.C, 16 r 3 p' - - -- - -� r � 1 \� 'i i Y I ' I � f -- ' � ' ; i I ,,, I �- I I � � i M � 2� I b ° '� � F� :- yf1 I `L h I O � _ � I � � I �-- -- -'- ----- — — — — —'--- — — � — — �—"�-- �� '� � � � � rt � � d?eoF uiv�' ac �� sX/ST/N6r NOUSC � 3� '°z , _.../' �� ✓ / . ,� . _ ��'�, _ ' _ ` - , `` / � .,z>a •i6",,o� , ___ , : �\� - ..��s 6 7i'ts +r8"o-c. ` � `` �� xs' � - I --- " -- – --�.__ -'-r-� — - � . �wro � � � � � � .o "'" {� �2�0' �W° '�'!/SSEI %S<`�O.C. � - ax s' �i'�etc. � 0 m ''1�'CC�fd 4C10�DC 1 . . . - � yH �� - � � �. . "i'CEyr �� -' � 1 tll��l�� ' ' ' � =111= �ociU �,�� II . . . . -N'Ij //_ �I�! . 8X8X/�a . l!• .�ot S�: e r�o�✓ A• A '4 � � _ �,/G _ _ . /q'" s I � 8.�c. _ _ _ � `� ._ . � iCTt . . . . . . . . _. . .. . . . . . �EXi,57aJH NoUSE. . . b� � iLao! ui._ �a ___ _. j� - � �`� _ � � - i � �— �� _ � � I I �� i �� (� I , , � � � 1 __ i I J ; - I �vae� to� : 4corEa: � � � � i �� I I I �� Si0 /�'!� � I � j I I . �`/ '_. . . �. j _ ' 1 , " . � � : � i i . . . � � ` ' � ' ` ' � � � �. I I 1. I j _"i� _-._ I I I � 1 • ' � ? I � __:__ i:; �I 4� �-1 _►:I: 1. I� ,� {j �:' __. _ . __ _ . , ___ , _. . . . __ _.�-��. _ _ ________ ___ _ _ _�- _____ . � __�_____ __ _______ __ ___________ _ ______ _ . ______ _ _ ____.___._ � ____ _ _____ _.__._ _ _ _ _ _ _ . __ _________ __ � . __________ _ . T_�__ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . __ � � ______ -- _____ _ _ ________ .� m uJ�sr .��r,o r.t��/ N � : � � y 0 Z � � z� �?" TM �: �t- ,� � � - i -� I � , ;- `''.- i' � � ' �- ��' �-1- � ��, � I,, L , ;I . (f, � , . ' �� ,. I i'! '1, ,�. , � � ,' . � . � , ; ,9. ;; �.'i I i �i 1 i ; � �ii.�,� i� � �,.i;f;f.,��-i i_ ,�, i n � �I��R I' � , ' ,{`' �' , � � I � 'I � : i �I j I � I I� '� `'' � � ; 1= J- - � � j � 'Fl:;_ � � �' � 7 �-� �_ I 1 i - � I. , ��' � _ii�i� � ' I , V. I. ��: i'� �; .�; ,� �� ; i; ' , , i 1 � i ; li , � A' � i � , � � �� I I Z � Zr � ' , g� i �A=� e �� : v� V ^ ��' ; �� I. I� o, ,. y� ' : � �'�I,I I i �;'�. ;, ' i � �i'!I' , �I ��i � II, 13 , c 4 i � � N � � � ; Y �, h , �� _ . . �,. ; 19 3 3 V � i t P A 0 4 h Z 2 � k . APP&AI8 COl4QSSI0IQ �B8tII1G - JUNS l,�y 1962 P4c� 4 21 la tb plans and Mr. �hLh ucpLin�d ffist L� bad �poba xitb lh�. CLrlc vho wid t�t rir� 6Lss ooald b pnt ia s lir� rall. Mr. LUhiab SndlaaLd aa lpbr�st ia nsing sneh +�indox� as tbat vonld allor �os li�t te oo� into ths W"ap. Th� rindov� ia t� hons� weu]+d b blocisd etl and Rypsurd. H� �dd�d tbat a 13 z lb foot d�aing a=w wuld b add�d to th� r�ar ef th� howe. Ile. •P'lam�l ulosd rho weld b doing ti� wric and l�h�. Eisbi�h �a]d b� would do th� tir►ishing hiawlf but wuld oontnot tor �o� of iL. Chairro�oan Gab�l asbd !f !tr. LisLish aight just bar th� �zi�ting garags do�+n aad h� said hs would. 1�. Harna aslasd if h� wnld Lav� accaas to th� back yatd through a gas�ge door and !�. Li�hLh eald h� wnld. Chair+asan C,�bsl asked if Uu sa,r •iding reu]d b anllabls and lir. Lishish said it ws bnt t�at 6� xas oonaid�ring �tuoceir� ths szt,�rior� bnt whrbwr D� d!d hs ron2d stv it coneLLnt. lh�.and Mr�. Aad+r�on, n�ighbor� ot t� 1[ishish'�� wr� aslo>d to oom� lor�ard. Mrs. Ar�dsrsoa indicat�d tbat thsir ao�pLint ri tbat tbs addition �r,ould L�ing it too cloas te t� prop�rt,� lin�, �apscia].�y vita tL� roof overhang. she also f�lt tbat it wuld ont tbs valn� of Uuir propsrt, to xhich Chairvoman Cabl reapondsd tbat ISr, assr,i.sn�. ia�roving tbe looks of h1e propert�y wuld inorease� rathsr than dscreass� ibs �alw of tbirs, !(r. Eishish addsd tbat ths Cit�y lLnn�r eaSd h� vou]d wrk ritb thea on Lndaeapin6 to lmep ths propsrty looking niee. }�r. Anderson addsd that hs fslt it vov]d aleo crsat� a wabr problss. Chairrroman Gabl said tbat �van !t ths varLncs vae denied I�, Eiahieh oouid �till build tae gsnge �uat tvo fest onr. SLs aalrod Hr, and ?fra. Andsreon 1! taey oonl.d diacuas this witb ths IisLish's to ma{m it more paLtahl� and Mrs. Md�rwn said th�y fslt it raa 3ust tao cloes. Appropriate draining ahould be ussd. }�TIOH t� lls. Gsrou. seconded by I�. H►rna, to aloes tbe public hearittg. IIPON A YDICfi VDTB, ALL VpTING ATE, CHAIRWOMAN GA�L DECLRED THE PDBLZC i�ARING CIDSID AT 8�05 P.M. ChairKOman Gabsl aalaad that it be noted in the raoord tbat a valid hardah�p b�d bsen estsb2lbhsd, She astosd �. CLrk �f tbtwire glass vindoxs xers �qui�alsnt in aatety �rith ths tire xall and Mr. Clark aaLd thsp vars, MOTION i� Mr. B�rns� seconded � Mr. Plemsl. tiiat the Appeala Commiaeion recoumiend to tLs City Counail. through tLe PLnning Comn�taaioa, approval of the varlance to rsducs tbe sids yard sstbaok for an attac�ed garage froa tbe requirsd 5 t��t to j fs�L, to allpr ths oonetruction of a 22 test � 38 feet attwched garage oa 7,ot 32� ffixk 6. C+rlaon•s Sw�it ISanor South, the saDe being 5312 Altura Ro�d N.E, vith tbe •tipulatScn tbat tbe north xill bs a tirexall vith 5/8 inch type x gypeum board and that aq}r vindovs in ths north rall b firs safs steel mesh xindovs. OPON A WICS Y01E. ALL YOtIIiG AYE, .CHAIRYf4MAlf GAPEL DECI.ARRD 1tlE Mp1'ION CARRIED ONANIMOUSLY 3. . 22 APP8AL3 COl4�II33I011 }BSTIliG • JONS 15 198? PAGE 5 lOTmP Ld' I�4�. P9ss1� s�ooad�d t� Nr. Cwron, to op�n tb publio L�aring. OPON A YO�S YG�, ALL W1'IIiG A2fi, C6AIIiWOMA1V GA�L DBCLUt� 1� i0ffi� �+1RIIiG OPfa1 AT 8�3A P.![. : an�urasxw►zzve s� � 6271 Jackem Straet 1t.L, A. P[�LIC PUt�OSE SERVED BY REQUIR�IT; Section 205.053, 4A, requires a front yard setbadc of not less than 35 feet. Public puz�wse sezved by t2iis requir�rst is tn allow for off-street parking rithout encroaching on the public right of way and also for aesthetic cons3deration tio reduce the buildinq "line of cight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard. ]1NNOR � : Section 205.053, 68, zequires a mir+*�,*+ 10 foot side yard adjoining livinq ar�a. Public purpose s�ved by this requirement is to maintain a minimum of 20 feet between living areas in adjacent structures and 15 feet betveea garaqes and - living areas in adjacr�t etructures to reduce exposa�re to aonflagretion of fire. It is also ta elloa for aesthetically pleasi`ng open areas around reridential etructuzes. 8. STATED HARASEiZP: 'Qnly location where I can build a gazage of the size naeded." C. 11DHIHISTRATIVE STAFF REViiSi: Thic home is located at the end of Jackson Street snd there are no other haaes that front on Jackson souLh of 1he petitionez. The petitioner wants to build an attached garage in,front of their existing house and have the access door face north and utilize theiz existing driveway. 7hey would also like to keep their existSrg garage oi vhich they will be requesting a special use pexmit, Sf the front yard vazianee is granted and the apecial nse p�mit denied, they will then need to p�m.ezt their exiting garage to living anea and they rill need a side yard variance for it. If the Soard approves these requests, we would zeconm�end that no vindws be plaeed on L2►e north vall of the converted qaraga. � l�..Jams� H. Cross� 6271 Jackson Strset 1P.fi.. 1►rid2ey. Iiinrieeota yas prea�nt. i�i. Clark anpplied Comdsaion membsrs xitb :�ri,al amd currant p�otographs of the propert�y. }4�. CLric sxpls�ned that l4�, GY�oea vishea to oonetruct a Lwo car garags vith ths driverray oft to ffis nortb and losep bis sziaLirtg garags tor aiscs].].ansous stong�, 2b do tbia Ls rould aeed a spscfal nse pereit tor ths ssoond garags, }�, �yark suggeated tEat tas Commiealon membera deal vith 23ch isauss aeparate�y. ge eaid tbat ths northsr�y nsighbor tad called and stafwd �Y �� ra�r aes the old garags left as a garage and not made into living qwrters, Nr, Cross aaid that although they plaa to bui.id a doub2e garage tLsq APPEAI3 C014SISS7AN !�E?IIiG J01� 15. 1982 PAGE 6 23 Sabnd to insta2l a sia�7.� door and es� it for storags. Cbairwoman Gabsl aabd �. Qwss to •atablish t� Lardship �nd h� saSd h� has tbrss �hiolss� + oamP�B trail�r, boat trai7�r and a sin�L prag�. l4�. �os� asla�d ffiat tbs �arlanw r�qwst to r�duce ffis �Sds 7:rd Mtback from 10 !«t to S fest on tbs 11�1ag �ide of tb dwslling �o tbs �zLtiag garRge ean bs oonnrtd to living ar�a b struck fro� tb r�qwst. H� �tatsd tbat th�y �itbsr y�At to eo ahe�d �rith CMO Qarag�a and ob41n a sp�cLl nes p�rsit or stay rith �t �y �Sys Aov. gs added that tiu rjority of tbs vork vould b� dons by themsslwe. Cbairvoman Gabsl irdicated tbat tbere ws no ons irho wuld bs i�act�d by tbs vieual cLangs bcauss of xhar� tbs d�wlling !s loeat�d. 1bTIDN ty Mr. P'1eme1� esoondsd t� M�. Gsrou, to closs tbe publio hearing. UPON A YOIC& VOTE.ALL VOTING A7E� CHA2FtYI0MAN GA�L 1�CURID 1!� PUBLIC HEARING CLDSID AT B�27 P.N. Tbs b+r�ship satabliahsd is tbs nesd for storags of vehiclss, ?lOTIDN � Ms, Gerou, sscondsd 1� 1�. Plemel� to grant the variance requeat to reducs the front yard astback iroa ths rsquired 35 ft. to 11 fL. to alloW tbs oonstruction of a 22 ft. by 24 ft, attached garags. subject to tba approval ot a apecial nse psrwit for s ascond aasssaory buildia6 at 6271 Jackson Strest N.E., �•y,dUy� }(i.naseoL, OPON A YOICfi Y01E, ALL YOTING A2B. CHAIHMOifAN GAHEL DECIAR� 1S�s MD1'DDN CARRIPD UNANIAIOUSLL. MOTIOR �?Is. C,�ron, s�oondsd by I�. B�rna� to d�� t2,s requsst to reducs ths alds yard aetback froa 10 fsst to 5 fs�t on the living s7ds of ths dvslling, so ta� �zi�ting garags can bs conv�rtsd to living area on Lot 4, Block 1. 7syns g�ray Additirn, the saas b�in6 62T1 Jackaon Stra�t I�� t+�aed on the petitionsra requeat and the nsighbor'� objscLions. DPON A YOICE YO'lE, ALL VOTIliG AYE, CAAIFtWOMAN GA�L D&CIARID 14� MOT7AN CARR� UNAN➢�WSL7. • ►.ir: :. �,i Chairw n Gabsl requestsd that ?!r. CL havs avail.ahle for each Commisaion member at nsxt ioesting a copy of msmorandum dated Auguet 2, 19?9� from }�Ir. Hersek to F4�idIeY CiLY Co +rh1�b dealt vith variance information. Chairwman Gabsl addre d 12�s j�ot of 6aving a handout avalLb2e for peopls oosing Snto i4'. CLrk's o n Lox to prspar� for an aPPaarance befors the Appeals Coe�iss]cn. Mr. CLr id taat h� doea indicats to people hor to p�repi=y� but it ths Coasias n Sred bs r+ould drax up a ahort checklist for peopls to follov (i.�. ha othsr tsrn�tiw a besn cona3dered. �+iiat ie ths hardahip. �nd i+hat to e at). � �.�1: JJ�x� prmN ty l4r. Iirna seconded t� t�. P1eme1. to l+ YOTING AYE. CHA MAN OA�'.L DECLIRED '1!� APPEAIS ADJpURpisU AT.B� P.M. Pat Von Hosch RecordSng Seoretar� UPOA � VOICE V01E, ALI. :ON ?16FsTIIiG OF JUNE lj� 1982, CITY OF FRIOLEY� 643'1 UNIVEFSITY AVE. NH. FRIDLEY, MN. 650�Q (612),579-3457 S600 �� SUBJECT Z JG ACTION '�ZOA # ACATIO SAV � `? �--G`I tiPS q_ ORDINANCE NO PUBLISHED /� DATE �(�O Z PLANNING COMMISSION: APPROYED DISAPPROYED_ DATE �40 CITY COUNCIL• PUBLIC HEARING DATE 1ST READ 2ND READ CITY COUNCIL: APPROVED DISAPPROVED,_ DATE_ NO PARK FEE REQUIRED: STIPULATIDNS: AMOUN7 PAI NAME� �- � [ �i �`f.� i� ..��-.�'�' �1 FEEEP� � STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY SE��'-c� f Y�S7' O RECEIPT NO ys� NE LEGAL DESCRIP7ION OF PROPERT �t 1 4 � I S' � � Lt• C� y Hr'`" �� PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFICATIDN�� EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY �4 r� �t ACREAGE OF PROPERTY � O�O DESCRIBE [iRIEfLY THE PRCP05ED ZOPaING CLASSIFICATION1 OR T PE Of LSE AND IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED � i fr_ e /�/ / /� �� -r..-f��o ,��a „a.�..-_� � �, .A� ,�_ �r��<�,:� Has the present applicant previously sought to rezone, plat, obtain a lot split or variance or special use permit on the subject site or part of it? `�'es _�no. What was requested and when? The undersigned understands that:, (a) A list of all residents and owners of proper- ty within 350 feet must be attached to this application. (b) This application must be signed by ail owners of thz property, or an explanation given whY this is not the case. (c) Responsibility 4or any defect i� the proceedings resulting from the failure to list the names and addresses of all residents and property owners of pro- perty in question, betongs to the undersigned. A sketch of proposed property and structure must be drawn and attached, sho�aing the following: 1. North direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on the lot. 3. Dimensions of property, proposed structure, and front and side setbacks, 4. Street names. 5. Location and use of adjacent existing buildings (within 350 feet). The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. �A7E ' d SIGNATURE / Gv� S , ' — PP ICANT S � �-i1 %�{/ ADDRESS _`�-7 �7� 0__,_� 3 ST �:�% • TELEPHONE NO /t�-r-� �� h'�'t s"� // z--- � � ^ N � ��'f ��r �..�,. ...� STREET MAP-CITY OF FRIDLEY .'.. tiv�t: /_i' : �• . . �. � �.ti� y `"9 -4�``4n . +'i � . �� ,�'.�h� . �(y}��` -s'CLL'3� 4..� - V 1 "4 :� K 't �!`�,,� i I 1 �� o'._ `_'.� i `� \ ;�`M�: '$iz. �� .:;,. , " r � ��:' - � � �. � -� 7,"��_ ,� . 26 '' - ��' �� w � `-;3�:� = �_ s � � �' ��. .:.n. �. r � :�'4' ; �`I $� �� Y� A � v i � '.�..c. � _Yit. _ � � i :.� � �'i [ Se� �. � : � �y (ti .� ' � -. _.t i�y i`4�� 'Y y F �5� 9��,irn �� E is°�.��Y '�''?'-' t !t i � . . „r . * [ 'y C'� {�•." . ? i �. i eyi �� .y. � s t�.. � S,. .�� t�, � ��gy �+ S : ° Z r�,;. ' � - 1 k 2 ;. � r �� . • r: a �' � �„�, <� +� *r �i- *t. L'��.�i fwv �.' � �y`�'. •,� . i . �'�'. - �.�`�r; _� J . '� �:_ il':� &N c y'C� � � ��{ y� ' ' �y, �`".,� �.lt� � i . _ i� � � �� -. y�Zi. /,ry4'61e. i "� - ., •.� > i�f' �:�'f"r : - � i�h ~ !� i= �r � � . �� i . K „ � f-''�� '� it t . «�i� f �tr"�-^• r ji. � M�1R 1��.� �.T ' a .. ). l . {0 . V� � . . � � � +.. 5y .�. �ZW �� f�� j}i 1 � _� F Zv' , �r�y.+� �' . `'� � , i . L r i�y� "� i t . . J i ' r . �. Y A.L . � � �, �, .. � � � ' } .� �'`.w... �✓� '�k-{ ' iarY Z4 ,4� :� � �a� k,�j [ �t� ��i ..K,'� �2' � : . k,s t. c ' �s ,y. :- +�. � >� r � �.�`. �3.t W' ; a �' � . : • � e.. , t i ��' t , r+ , .; *1.� �:P �:� � � wC' .c .��: . � '" f `, i. '� ' i, �, _ � .�: , r" �M � "'� L w y�. a �.s � � ��if 1� ti . F y � � .� �'� Y� � `J` �3i� N � } � J�S 9 � � _ .�, v"� �. ��?:< ..`� ;`�� e ". J tl ' b�� I' . � � .r � _, F f 1'+�7}.�.yt.r y.�� v.+�CK� �'Y �1 ' : i � Ai'rC,ri'�'jl'� 3�;r �-�i::� a 'a _.� Y ?tji � ss J y - �, - � • -. � �'.: i ,r�. uy.7Mn �. s-�.�L".s .cj � -, [� il{y � _- � �tiyi — � f �1 � \ �. �. 1 '}! 4 J � I •� � 'A :.�y,�� /�. t ?�'� �-f t Jr' 4� r7� ,��.�. '_� . ,,.. ,��, f i• r`. � 7 N. iR � � f 4�j ' � . � i;r } �.. �l � � �� {*AbyrL't�lk'��' ��'�0�.'�\i �:1 � � ,� . • �i �;',�L`a r a �i x _r � -l•'��,,,,, . �'`4;r.''��"y,-3.„t��,�ni}, �..�3 _3,r7 i1 �� + i�' . Z�.T'i'�` '.._ y's4SY� "_ t`.y'r �t �� R � �a' +�: � � �;:' s .Y'i � • lEi �'. \p: �� k i}' '; ! � {; 3"�'�`4,q - � . f � i[.� .c• i; y � � ..'h � �' '' +. •. Y �-i`� Jx�� a ��:: ;� `, `• � � ti �n .�j� � -y . � �y� f �_. _ .. . Yl� R{ S 1/ � �� , �. � � ♦� .!�, Zty �,t 4.� - 0� ' T y�� i�- �� `-^'�� Y �. � ��v . ..�. , .. �` ,%� is`�r v � ��' � "` �''� r{ �� ' � Q � � �K c .�r � : . v . . �.��,� -s �r- "�.. , , �. c. � . � . �1 . � �.,i� . . (� �:f ' �.°�`�'� �� Ne � �C~':�.,= � 7 � -.� e �'a � ' >i 0.' , �"' °��' t'�" �.5�° r s. _ 5��.-ni•�i;.. ,e.�„Y=:-f+�.l.. _. �,. , . � � � 7 r i �V � � T i i L^ b �, o 0 '4 0 � ; � `� „ f, 2 . 1 i- � � � u- � 0 ti; z� �'c: 4 ' . � a _' 'o w M �. _ S __,. _ _ Z � �, .� � T 1 0 c.� � `f, r '\ :� �. ,ce -.` � �l n� � n�.�N � � -, .. � t .. � - " � .\ � t,; ; v S` . � 1� ,\,�•� Q �/` J' •1 '�.4�! � a: ;. ; ✓�c �� y', J' � , ��/ �. �-L t. ,,..: , � � 7'� i h a ✓) �u : 1 . • , 1 . i / ��i ;�o .. foca�c 0 0' 'o _ � � F � . o � : � s C ' _et�.� y - 1 • S = ' � n -; .._� � 23� � � . � . .:, �' � ��": ��. ' - 'n�oi�2 �',�. _ � -: X/ `� i c m . . / — �` i� ' . . ��' � ,; � . ,; � . � '� fr .,��r� / / .' . � �+ �t% -/' � 7�� _ � . . I r/� / p� . d� `r . j .,,,. ��`-.� ' � �� u � ,'' ' , I � I r � � � . / I/ '/ 1 .._�� i � i . /^ VI � ! � / � I�� .`. � �' m �. ,` � I� I' �1� �J h:. g�� .��a. . i „' ' 9. �'y .,F I � . J / 1 B � I . _. .'v935'— _ � . { � , , }_ i i ..ss' � . 1 �O . �_ _s� - � ` I '1� ! ' � � .. � . � . . _ "1 . (�.a � �'.` � ,`,: -*I �.a I "lt , � �� , `� F,o,.;z.o� �Le9 I..�i � r�IJS I/�i �� _ � _. _ — �c��. �` -- -- - - . �� '-'�^�ama�7�n t�. �ao uVC W'C R C S'J -� i+� 3•J<annnnr'3 '1 �'..' �Prt.�.p�.~,.�Snn —� 707 �7b ^ n G C O^' � n � m T�+ n Rr0062 .�.p« 9 OCm D n � a n 7 7 7 - � ! ^ /1 1� V �. .T R .. r y � ' � � � � 'J � ^n �wDM�7�n7b � >n n O C _ t G � 7� =�-^1-� � �-v r.- 't ` V[ J � � r7- S �� C'� _ .n L 3 = � �� „ y 0 _ _. ' -� �� . CIJ7F�SL � .l.i � •Il�� . C �. . V�' . R� G R L- ❑�.imp P;...�.. —. . " ••. �•'t C ^��^�'T� � - 3b3 —= v =� 5�.�� ° ", -�.. _ f��JG�1r�n�ll �J i7�. ^ � ^.. T.T. �'� � _ O C p r _ r•�— i S� n fD O r_''1 T• r tn : �"� O T N�n C^ f •' . J�n •:i�.:._]Nnnv^I L.• 1±rx r. . "'7" � ^ni � S y r O :� �+. n �, C c ' ^ •�'. C n on -� �- - r 3 .-n.-�,, _ -•' '� _ v ' ... ^ y c � T n : :�^C f OT C . O f.� . � L � n t- � 't � ' — G O n. r� �- R 4 C � � K' S ^ r — � � tr': 7: �' ' C' G E ' .. ' r �. '1 !1 � •�. .� •. w �. � L� � ' I �� i 'c o ` �` � i� � _ n I: c� un L w 4.TH' ST�� z � --- • �°J — _ „� ._. _ r., <e.�:�.• � „�`1'�� c�'i > r C � f"I A �-i O 7 ! \ S� r r c i� iC y- d � l �• CITV OF FRIOLEY. SUBJECi B49'1 UNIVC'CiSITV AVE. NE. FRIOLEY. MN.6363C �07Z7,571�7�360 RDORESS: LOT SPLIT J � 7� 5�-SG ` 29 LSNt�d'D� DATE: �%'�- ?UWiING COPMISSION: APPROVED` OISAPPROYED_, DATE �� %� NO � CITY COUNCIL: PARK FEE REQUIRED: STIPULATIONS: APPROVED DISAPPROYED_ DATE NO_ AMOUNT PAIO NqME A. Os�ar Carlson fEE��00_,QB RECEIPT.NO� PROPERTY OWNER(S) Assurance Manufacturina - Fee Owners 7ELEPHONE NO>RO-4�59 A. Oscar Carlson - Contract Purchaser TELEPHONE NO.y45-0757 ADDRESS{ES)_ 9010 Everareen Boulevard, Minneanolis. Minnesota 55433 655 Fairview Avenue St. Paul Minnesota 55104 PROPERTY LOCATION ON STREET 7753 Beech Street & 7752-56 Elm Street LEGAL DESCRIPTION Of PROPERTY Cots 4,5,6,7,20,21,22,23 & 24, Btock 7, ONAWAY TOTAL AREA OF PROPERTY 50,340 Sq. Ft. ' PRESENT ZONIN6 M2 REASON FOR LOT SPLIT Division of existin9 building for future seperate ownership The undersigned hereby dectares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. � OATE: G �''�Z SIGNAT� ' _��0��7� - , , yCG�J � - — NOTICE: A sketch of the property and the proposed lot split with any existing struc- tures shown should accompany this appiication. " � (See reverse side for additional instructions) i_ _ _ . n N ,..�..�. � � �o�A�o� STREET MAP-CITY OF FRIDLEY : �! s ��et ��,+ ' f �` 1 ' S � �*4 / 'ti ,'' Y co'f' • e ' '" n i i a � '. // � ° � . d;s°� s ': i�� } . A+ �Y � r ``d�- y iv � e' � � � � i � � : O � O '� � Iw � � � �"� � � -. . � Q I: o � �� I „�c; ° � --� —t — h � ��jx0 i _ Q � 0 y ' �� n n W ? � � V� N �V �� ` �� O w ` _` 7 � \�p_�J� a Y - � R t'.�.�e� ' ae '%� s,. � � 31 ' �� ° � � (n f" ;° . �\� . -�� -�� O a� • � �p��P.. .. � i! � /� :� _ �.-" .- ..- --.... � /L'5' " '� , j... a /o �� ~ y � � Y _ D�t . Y' o �? � �``y+ � P ��. `�if. �� : � . . ti .5' /I�r°$ !ti'ky � d �u H � ` y ..o /' ,:s�� f'�'��. � v e� � s��,�E,:` ' �� y!e� lo f �' ^ ' Is� °- 6D ,� � s. .e • - .. , . �a ��ri �"�' ` ` a �► o HICKORY STREET o d4.s f 'a u � ff.1 � � , + � f� .. . . . . � . . . � .. 4i 4lJ! . � �u nr y� �-I , : �L " � VI � �v t�+ }v ti�l H ti H� 1V ti\\�\♦ +� ��7 I , 2•o �o � v � u, A 4, I ro I� O b 40 �°� h e ao fe . s b.:, r � OOD STR ET o x•, . . . � .. . •`•,•x p� 9Q � .. ., .. ,}C B.L w " . . •. _ . .. .. .. ., ve !.!r F �� a�. •�� I� � �� tp co V I6� . U� ia l�a N� a � O �ooe V � W 1e\a ��A Wnt�•Q ti �. �. ,_ m 4•� ( - � a. , BEECH '' � c ^o STREET ^o A �, a . _ _ . _ . ,. .� m .� .. .. .. .. . .. .. _ .. . .. g� ..., � n � � w �� M � �.� �� ultv`NjN�tv �u �, h �v n, N � � � �2 1 'Ai p bt��'V a� �bl��y�� a w�v�� p�b 0 v�� t Y I(6d,n1 ,� � � :s <r �I� . � .I tc '� 4bMIi sa � - - - • .. , i� .. o e.t • ^ e i - .. .. .. .. . _ .. . .. .. q� si: : oi�o!w:v Q. �, a.. w;n, �: :�a;�,ti � o�o � v�a� �,la�c� n, .: I � , i. �. � ; sa K - ' � •• � �< �.a �e �o �iv� I ELM o m o�� STREET p• � r °� IL' ' i � . . . � ' If0 W'Si � �L ..' . i .. 1 .. . .. .. . I .. �. ., ap M). � I j ��1�*al^l��i�U� Tb \ '\ \y�, tUj�f�TV�TV'N�^1ItV TV �11 �l'Tl+\ \ \ \� ,�I�I�;`v �N � O b ,:v`°�^ 'o,v �l� c�,�,:� 4+ ti� o�o m v�y : , �. �si .. ��ie wts eo - - i.. . � s[zr ,y � . ' . _ . . . .. .. .. .. .,... ,:.� -.� u � � . � . .. . ..... . ... a".. w � .s . A .. I . .. � A .. . .. 4e /.I� � � � i� ••� _ � u s 11G I J.. .. ., ;� 0��p''-b � v ��A iu ltv � e a a I 4, j t�v �� p` ��o m v f a� �� a w� tv �� , r � F 1 � GO ti� ` ..I ., ! , �' EI 1. i 1: 1 i •� . .. 4 a i z �� w w C RFF � . z e � Surveyor's C�rtific�te 32 COIiSTOCK & DAVIS, INC. Consuiring Engneecs and Land Surveyors 1446 County Road J,1►1p1s., Diinn. 55432, 7849346 Survey foY: Paco, Inc. 592Q Y•iskarood La. Plymouth, HN ! Ptortgage survey Lots 1-7, Blocic 7 Oaaway Pnoka County, ItN To:rens Cert. k1522 , `o, �a �ar a i Lo� a� ti �� Q � Y D2 �oR Q ��a �� O V � `y� � . �' 0 .. •- — — �e 7B� �E �!� � /.ifrSO .>.,�e la G G'.,,r_ IIm e�ua �v 42sa 7 _Sro,ey,,.,,� _.. ........- BL/LOI.tlG � j � 30 1 � `* syy I _ e �, •y �. �i � �_..._�_E �T �� w � QJ I , �O � ••T ', l�! `b ( � I . , ...._..._._ .;..._..----......ti__��....� � T �0 i; i v r:� �� ,p v� �. .:.....-----. ...._.._._.._._._.._..... / .Sroas� B.toc.t[ � ; o ��. ��--... B�!�,�.o%i.v_�__._.. � ,_ � �, . f':i —' i.�so �m GUEsTBit� y $ ` tn c � I 30 � �I w h� .� w � SCALE:��SD' Descrintioa: Lots 2-7� Block 7, Onaway, Pnol:a County, :4T and 1/2 of s Dc�ofes%ionmenwns.�f found vacated alley with easements of record I herzby certify thaf this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Fegistered Land Surveyor under the ]aws of the State of iliinnesota. .%/ �.w� 10>32 7/15/75 3653 Reg No. Datc ]ob No. ELM STREET F K � ... e I m i w d � ' • � � ' �1 : I 'M i ,O C M I � . n � O . � e G t� ... .~..'� � � � _, y �• .e�. ._._ _ _ _ _ . — , � � �� J dr ve-in dock �. ._. .... ._ _ ._ _1.2l8s.i� _ _ �c�' dll�do Actsy �- � a 0 e -- o rr _. _ o n . _.:� - .,1 �j ' O U � i ' .�.. , � O � � • r. n i N � � N ' �. N ' � � � � � -i _ ` . � �M. . m ' f!�Lm , �w:.: CP � �. O � �. � n .m Z � � � . , . � - . ' . �.! - ' . . , . a .�': . � a• _ • N 0N� � . ... . ' . . ' _. . . f1 W W N 'r.' . . �... ,,,i a : � __ -'_ �'_ ' na . : � m ,. ' . z .� N. . . . . . . , _ . . . _. . .._ p - � 7 _ '_�-- _ , � BEECH 8TRl3P�T 33 . 34 en�en �G �� GRAPHIC ARTS 'i 655FAIRVIEW AVENUE NORTH•SAINT PAUL,MINNESOTA 55104•TELEPHONE�.(612)645-0751 June 30, 1982 Mr. Jerrold Boardman City Planner City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 - Dear Mr. Boardman: First of all, I would like to thank you for taking time to visit with Jim Benson and I on June 8 to discuss the enclosed lot split application. The�application pertains to the vacated alley between the buildings located at 7753 Beech Street N.E. and 7752 - 76 Elm Street N.E. Please note that the application has been signed by myself as Contract Purchaser of the property and also by Dallas Anderson of Assurance Manufacturing Company as the Owner. For your information, we are having the lot surveyed with the enclosed application in mind. The legal description of the property will be subject to this Survey. It is my understanding that the next City Planning meeting will be held on July 14 and the next City Council meeting is scheduled for July 26. We would like to have the application on the agenda for those meetings. If you have any questions regarding this information, please give me a call at 645-0751. Thanks for your help and cooperation. Sincerel , � �—''� A. O��tif'� arl s on enclosure cc: Jim Benson Keith Boulais Bob Parta Over 130 years oi progress Plus Completely new streamlined facilities! Incorporating — Printing, Inc., True-Color, McGill, Holden and Jensen Printing Companies. � ;. � : r b�� _. �l�. QU1U-�IY -t3��'� � ';; ' � h�6T�t� �: 31�E 15, i982 ��al�let�.:�e Ju� 1�, 1�2s '�E��i�r.Qi� % ��T�:�.�. �r;;�r�isksan.'i�ar�ia Sch�Bf ilI Dah#tm, J1ss8c. iate Rlanner . `; p�y� . :�;=`. , idea and sta�Eed f��;".. ��rw9rrkpl�r►s: rDgn �fr ,m. �erxr.sevr_ awi; �` ¢i71fAG'€`�. ? 3 � .� r � r �' _ " �� n, �� K x � � �,�� F4 i r �',-, �, w"Na' �� a1..t�atity Gnnm9ssian � �+� PeLerson �TflN,,�,MINUFES:; !ItE3VE T8& MAY IB. 1982� `JCGLA:RSU THS 1Vp4'ZON : Eve�d`an €nvi►ro�mer+tal ;i# has been 5taff's €�sion �embers ta have �fth��tL�rer p�r�Qinen��_� �ies io Mary Caynn, Nwrcan u!3€ied it f�2r the , �on. ti�sai y on each srf t#�a �e �urpQSe; and furic�tfon ��d aiso be g�d tc� z �tl"�SS? S3'APF TD .C�N5I�Eit T1i8 09`XEJt C,TZ'Y CON�F3'.o^SIONS �fiION FIi1NAS�: 4`XEREBY [ d� !iffiiT IS �.D�Ph'N3`lY� .. ; ��, �tl �tl`fR AL�"�� ' S��tiF�- fTIF�` J 15 1982 A&E 2 U�IP 1f vQFG� Yt?�'3�-� iN7��'�ITG 11Y�r G7fAtiF�+BRS� ,g[►ANN9A F�CL�RBD ',i'2�° 1f4TZON � �7SX�� w �` Mi+aY��7�� /1DW� � �..1� �i�Fl I�lV�� TCJ .. . 1�".'.+�#lElit 5��#Lt1 ��E £��6►�'lREIl�81�'h8�31i EW�I�A� �f �!SOgj�lR4�1�►TS fOf � �p;�s-t0 �#s�ss �th Hbr�$��S" �'epaPed � bY �ie M�tCa1�-f. He sfi�tt.ed� MS. Mettal f ; " rR�� sb�e`ta att� �e �� but 5he f�,l s�tblM�tf�d th4s outlieie f�� tt��: � S.c�a��s�ion`s disctf�iion, ° " lfi�.� i�n s�ted 3� '�ttg�t` tt� Enviroti�enCal i�uafifty Ct�nnissi�-should meet �� r�#;�t= Cit� GodnC#l. 3�on fng :Ltreir workptarr,; a�t iE,��d be; a� goad- t9me f�r t#►e �#ssio� � a�t�e �ouncil 1f tha.Cca�issia�r� shca►ld .put�sf� a meeting �e'i� th� h�ier�. ��e �� C�y�cauid �13cr.�#sa�uss�rritb the Gt�y��utxil the � ; ; 'sottd:traste probt�m a�f i� ��i�i['ts needed �#�etp st�lve=tMat pr�lda� metro- :y ��iian-wi�. �.`. � �fr:� Ska�d�: asked; a�w� th�"��is =ofi tha�� Rner�a �s�rt�,Y So'iid� WaSt� #(anager��t �� P'l�kts. � ;.. � � � � <: �: D+�bt�i`st�te�f !�* k��e pian did not �rke the Rpri7 1 de�rcCt#�re. !te stnted `b �►ts �hrt�►i3�a. Dir�ctctr �:�t►�t�rnnental Serytit8s► A�►ka Co�nt�,� �as p�romi�d � #tf� some #t�ormatt�i !ty 1�r�f 3��,�, �r. �r3rrct� �tated �� tl�'ti��ks a-�99od idea Sf.�Fwe Ctimqtissioia me�ber+s reviewed the - It�iia Ccf��,� Soi9d �ast� .,' �e►�t Pian in �irder" t� Ptbvidt sc� can�ec�ts �d � i3�t�ssti� City.��=.Tt�it�t�d��►�be a g�od"'f��fpr the�Co�mt�s'�p�.'E� review � � ttrf� pl�n�b�fare �t�r��w�#� �,�e��City t:iwn��t as tiiat p'�aTM��+dti}t��1so tie in �� ffii� t possible ►ae�i�g �r'r� haulars. .., ; . . ., ; � ' ffi` �1R. P� BIC XR. A�IE�' T#,!�` 1'�E J�V QIIALITl' r;' ? � . .QF,�;�ISB �:i/1'�,3`�i4"..Ct�'Y' I3C RE6AftLZNG ; ; i�tKf"�/ >t'�P' R� F 4'�+44` �, 3 1'+�i �PSS'1htDST G�P"' �HS ' �NIF TNA NR'Y - � '��,�iB �:! _ . � ��:1:9fiSR �,< . (,�T 'AQiiiib � � � �+TX� F"iRt`:'R8'` X�;> `�9'Y CdUlPCIL` �Y "�14V7€ HA#t :11: CS 7'D ' � � �r � ;�13�Aq�1�� , � � NAffi�SMS�1'T' F.Ri9 � SQ,T�A9' A �� CAN IfG < ' ' $ €FF01RT3 ` �RP�FDE " i.�R CH A RiN� .` " fi"iTR ' Lil T �'if8' PLAN ' 'l�} 7'f�1PAGZ#I�i i4� ' .: s : ` , 1�';`.Pt'te�`� agr�eei �t ��d b(�. bEtter ta d� wi�ii�C�'!� C9wrtei'i 'ancS S�tF first #t�d �1et t�Jether o� what.�4frec�rri tAey �rani.£�► ga �t'4� �tianaiqg a�e+e�ir�g : W'Ft� the i�Iets. ; `, �► � vox"e� �s, �r.� -ap�it�t �. C�a�st�i� sv�t 1�scr.�rs� �ers �trvrv � �t.raD'tr�eAa�r�riS%l". � :', . �„ � , �_ . �� '- � � 1�«:.`£�btt3n °#tate�t ��`.�de the Cam►3�si-ort t�i�.s 1•#st pf<tfie tFaitl�rs _wAar work it� Fridieyay • r ,�- =� -� , C � � �� ? ��x.�,� �; � � �,, " , �'E l5 ii.�'�`"V'E"''`x �' !� �� '�'t <� �� .rf(<i. � ,:�c{ �J �..t�.:�� .5 �!� e F �y .. �'" � `t � �" i � .. . yf` t �. i�' �+ T� 1 . $ t x y, i�' � M. C� '� �¢ Y �. "fl a � �^ �, t -6� f ,_ ., t �.-.' . J '! if? M'::. I 8 Y. #� 5< l z 5��2 FfiF t � �' ' � � ,,�,r i � ,. x�..� -�- s� .� `�.sn< : ' ' :. < t� � '' � "�'� r s # ,�'`' ; : � �t� � . .. �y`h � � ,• �Fi �` , �ce � � VvisG � � � ��G' .3 � y '�R�.'� k � b'i4 �.,5.�t i y � �. ig ``i 5 �xi '_ � _�•.. , . � ' _ c t z � �_ � �. �€ � ?�,��}��;� m: " ; _ ,. . �� - � �� " s '"a; �'' f � � a3 �� • �°�l-��f�M, � , �.,. . y ,. � .�,� x _ � �.. � `^ _ . . � � �! Rt ��i�� r�' "�i i � - � � '�°g��;��d ino.�r-#n€or+�t��lan. �� , �. � �; ��`��'�� 1+!>A�AIt#lU1 G�(T� � .Ott'f. �. , , � : � �, .. .�.� - yy�y�yy, yy� J �;� '��; ~.� � F'Fi}��Y4��V�Y�. .. � . { �.yA �y��/��(� � �� }.��t�RY#�iY't7 • . p ; �qw��r� . . t � Y°, ' ` t �" ��t#�} �#�er � � - �� f�� i:� �'��„; a�",� �iatt�. s#at� �e �1,1�^. S�da,: t�#r�n.�trf the Energy CtNnr�issicrn, � �,�,� . � �d �e, f;�t, ttlm�t, �aeYC`�in� [t�tii��itetl RecYct ing Recognitt4n ry> � °� �# �h� �� #�tl �adisscn �m t� 2q, �t� stated Aibert Bartlett, ~`°� `a {` sr€ FII��'1E�, llA��tersity a� S�`�� and authar o# "The ' ��` �`� ° ` �ttnd+��fat!��s of t�e E . ,� , nergy: �t3'�S ;��is one of the � f�atured y � �'� � ��; � �P'fe��the �Y�Ti+�� i'�r��.ing and wESSrLfiwMi 7e to �,. �. � _ .�. � } � �'.1'A � - . . . � .�. . f ��!5 r ��''� �� iiE� -�$@�f � �. � t .'. �,:. : . _ . ; . . - -' f �..; �,� ,��.�1s,c�d ti#r� G��ysion'� tl►a�s. �-�aq�+irtq antsLf�r Recyc]ing x� �e��t�lmpr, He �d�d rro# .� t�e F�'�dl� Recyct�fng W�ek� in � , �� _�__�`,��t�f�.'�r+c��thEti�tAer:%d°�ex��._co�xated �tery .�� 1!�'!.r � , � ; ' ,,�� 'z ; . `�.. " -.s • � , � � ° � .� ' z;� "� ��y��Pir�Rrs�t'►�s�[teii.'Eha� sie�c$_suniaer is-a �rd.^time wftA vaeatiol�s� �' � " j�p'�e �t e�,�fr�g the� su�6�r', he t�� a bet�er time wouid� 6e � <� ��- ��, {4t,'�:+� #l�r� i� t�aaliy �tit] nt�e �ther, but peop3e are "�� " �3i��f,� �c��ct► tt�t �t�efC ��i'#rd��, gara�es. �tC.. thefore winter. � ;� '_r�y€.} °� � ;� � � �s�'��ters �g��Q. �^'� . � . . Y ' �: : . r . . � ;3 � � �', ��i-at,�t�d l�iat Ns;:l�et�aif -i� '�fw#tfkf�-abpuG �i�g�a feas1b31ity �< � i�#: �Ntr`�ec3r��fi�4_C�t��r ��;� Wedtie��s f+�um 5-7 p.m., ��r �` �� ;�- #6�#t,�r af l+$�hg s�niea�s for '� tvening. Tf this tfceurs. `., �� :��i,�im��fon �tid s�t�C-�►t eff,ort by occas�ana�ty � ��'� zt ' �t�& h�i€s�s�,11t�} ydloeYer -is :��a,y�d= s�n -'t%at evening. e �� ` � . � ` !�`, '�vi�� '�.�.�1�# be wiTiir�g � assisi on accasion. de asxl��d � � '� �' � ��- �. ��ad �'F.�� k�1'p �#re T�i�st� pus%t�: � . � , t ; x =; � + 4 � r�� + t' . - . � � �` � �� : - . _ _ . . . � �� . .. . . �. �g � �, " � � ��'�� . . �. } `�K, � ', ' � � . . � xF. a� ,'f� .. . . .. ... . . , � . . . . . ,. n-. . ... � . -� . . . i :� � C1. Nt�,�v„_ � �s#T� Y4 ��!!T. 1�ss- rrs ��wic. aia�av;� ax Jll'�C8 V�r 1!I«L'1+l�T14R4' 7�+4� WATit'1'Y.IXl1! �sp�Lfa��r � �tied, ' � x��:�- �� s��: A NbYlifavY YW�9� �� it ��RSf � 11D�7OUxM► T17F li�Tdt/�, pl�lNl ml'S.amTen 9+Yr. .it1�i+ 3�§_ ��'ttsaZ � �� . . i � �b1dlF' 1YBST� A71Z1iiTRNSZ> dT 3s3D P.11. � � �-- � � ; $ � ,� x. � �.a _ � . , � ; ;. . ; � �. ... CITY OF FRIDLEY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEE7ING JUNE 17, 1982 CALL TD ORDER: Chairperson Commers called the June 17, 1982, Housing & Redei�velopment Authority meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Members Absent Larry Commers, Duane Prairie, Carolyn Sveriidsen, El�ars Prieditis Wa7ter Rassmuson Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner Virgil Herrick, City Attorney Sid Inman, Director of Central Services Patty Hardel, 332 - 64th Ave. N.E. Steven Hardel, 336 - 64th Ave. N.E. Cheryl Nybo, 1612 Berne Circle E. David Wagner, 1074 Lombard Judy Lee, 4948 Emerson Ave, So. Len Schollen, 6381 Univeristy Ave. N.E. W. G. Doty, 6379 University Ave. N.E. Howard Helgen, 7502 Tempo Terrace Sharon Gustafson, 437 Rice Creek Blvd. APPROVAL OF MAY 13, 1982, HDUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MOTION BY MR, pRAZRIE, SECONDED BY MS. SVENDSEN� TD RPPRD['E THE MAY 13� I982, HOUSZNG & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHJXITY MINUTES RS WRITTEN. � UPON R VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE� CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION I. WELCOME NEW MEMBER - WALTER RASSMUSON ( REPLACING RUSSEL HOUCK ): Mr. Comners stated Mr. Rassmuson's son is ill, so Mr, Rassmuson will not be at the meeting, II. CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION FOR RUSSEL HOUCK: Mr. Commers stated he had before him a certificate af appreciation from the HRA which read: "Certificate of Appreciation, City of Fridley, Mn., Awarded t�sel Houck, June 17, 1982, Housing & Redevelopment Authority". HDUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, JUNE 17 1982 PAGE 2 Mr. Cortmers stated Mr. Hauck served at least two terms on the HRA and had participated on a regular basis. He was very dependable in his appearance at the meetings, did a good job, and the HRA would like to express their appreciation to him for his good service over the years. III. .SELECTION OF VICE-CHAIRPERSON: Mr. Cortmers stated that Mr. Houck was the vice-chairperson, and.the by-laws provide that the HRA must have that position filled. He declared the nominations open for vice-chairperson. MOTZON BY MS. SVENDSEN� SECONDED BY MR. PRAZRIE� TO NOMINRTE ELMARS PRIEDITIS FOR VZCE-CHAIRPERSON. MOTZON BY MS. SVENDSEN, SECONDED BY hIl2, PRAIRSE, TO CIASE THE NOMINATIONS AND CAST A UNANIMOUS BRLLOT FOR ELMARS PRIEDITZS FOR VZCE-CHRIRPERSON OF THE XRA. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� CXAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY. IV. CENTER CITY PROJECT: A. Update: Columbia Park Properties 1. Memo �82-47 from Executive Director Mr. Boardman stated Columbia Park Properties had their bond closing on June 16. Minnesota Title has insured over any of the problems with guarantees as per the contract documents. The HRA members have a copy of a signed option, in which Mr, Doty agrees to give the City an option on the property for $1. He stated that satisfied Columbia Park Properties on their closing. Mr. Boardman stated everything else is moving along. He stated groundbreaking ceremonies will be on Friday, July 16, at around 2:30-3:00 p,m. He stated he would like as many NRA members as possible at the groundbreaking ceremonies. 2. Resolution HRA-2-1982 (Concurring with City Council Action on , Columbia Park Properties IDR Bonds) Mr. Boardman stated this action has already been taken by the City Council, As per Section 7.2 of the Contract for Private Redevelop- ment between Columbia Park Properties and the Fridley Housing & Redevelopment Authority, it also requires the HRA to approve bonds. He would recomnend the HRA approve HRA-2-1982. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING JUNE 17, 1982 PAGE 3 MOTZON BY MS. SVENDSEN� SECONDED BY AIR, PRZEDITIS� TO APPROVE ... RESOLUTION NO, HRA 2-.2982� "RESOLUTION CONCURRSNG WITH THE CITY. CWNCIL ACTiON APPROVSNG Tf1E SAiE OF $4�000�000 SN INDUSTRIAL DEVEIAPMENT REVENUE BONDS FOR MORTGRGE TO F& M MARQUETTE NRTIONRL BANK��AS TRUSTEE". UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING RYE, CHRIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTSON CARRZED UNANIMOUSLY. :.. 3. Resolution HRA-3-1982 (Approving Construction Plans) �1r. Boardman stated he would recortmend the HRA continue this resolution. One of the reasons for continuing it was they have not yet received the final plan documents. There were some modifi- cations in the initial document, and those have not been received so the HRA was not in a position to approve this resolution at this time. Mr. Commers stated that since the resolution involves the approval of the construction plans, the HRA would like to have the Building Inspector at their next meeting with regard to those p7ans. He also believed it required the HRA to have a copy of the construction contract in terms of the bid, because it requires the HRA to approve that the construction is not going to exceed the funds available. Mr. Boardman stated the bids should be back by the next meeting and an actual contractor seiected based on those bids. He would have the Building Inspector at the next meeting to answer questions. MOTION BY MR. PRAIRIE� SECONDED BY /442. PRIEDITIS, TO CONTINUE RESOLUTION NO. HRA 3-.1982 UNTZL THE NEXT MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, RLL VOTING AYE� CFfAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MpTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. Resolution HRA-4-1982 (Request City Council to Authorize Bond Sale) Mr. Commers asked Mr. Sid Inman to explain his June 3, 1982, memo on the Bond Saie. Mr, Inman stated the City has accrued $1.7 million in special assess- ment temporary bonds for their construction project (normal sewer, water, and street improvements). They anticipate selling these bonds as early in June or July as they can because of the projected window in the interes# rates. They have prepared the resolutions for the Monday agenda for the City's sale, and if the HRA concurs and agrees to request a sale by the City Council, they have prepared those also for the Monday agenda. That wou7d give them a bond sale of approx. June 12. HOUSING & REDEVELOPHENT AUTHORITY MEETING, �UNE 17, 1982 PAGE 4 Mr. Inman stated the advantages to a bond sale are: (1) The HRA's issue oing with the City's tends to drive the interest rate down; and (2� The HRA gets a 25� break on the administrative costs by going with the City on a combined sale. Mr. Inman reviewed the computer run by Ehlers & Associates dated June 7, 1982. Mr. Irnnan stated that if the HRA was concerned about their cash flow, there might be some wisdom in waiting. He stated the resolution requesting the Lity to issue bonds does not require them to issue at the same time. Mr. Corrmers stated there was some concern about the cash flow available on the funds if any other projects would develop. Mr. Inman stated that later in the agenda, he has a financial report, and a lot of the HRA's increment flows through the state in the Homestead Credit. The HRA's, like the cities, are experiencing some problems in the payments of the Homestead Credit. He stated the HRA will note on the financial report that a$74,000 payment received in January 1982 should have been received in 1981. At this point, he did not know what the City's reduction in Homestead Credit is. Mr. Conxners stated they should continue Resolution 4-1982 until the end of the agenda when they discuss the financial report. B. Bids on 64th Avenue Project (Memo �82-43 from Executive Director) Mr. Commers asked if it was necessary to relocate 64th Avenue even though they may not be doing the office building, Mr. Boardman stated he thought they were looking at the necessity of relocating the street because it was pretty well set when the clinic was designed. The clinic was located toward the back of the property primarily because of the office tocation. In order to get adgquate room to develop an office fartfier to the north, they had to look at going across the street. As per the conditions of the contract documents with Columbia Park Properties, Columbia Park Properties wanted to ensure they had adequate access and said they needed an access easement. That access �asement is actually an easement that was set up over the property. That leaves the HRA 50 ft, of property between that access easement and 64th. In recent discussions with Columbia Park Groperties, they were very concerned that the HRA was even considering not putting in the revised 64th Ave. Their main concern was that once their building is up and open, 64th Ave. would be closed for the purpose of construction. Columbia Park Properties is requesting the HRA to take an action to put the roadway in per the original plan, MOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, JUNE 17, 1982 PAGE 5 Mr. Cortmers asked the cost of the project, Mr. Boardman stated the tota7 street project is $51.607� and the sewer and water project is $13,125. He stated the sewer and water has to go in to service the clinic. He stated they are approximately 26% below the original engineering estimates. If they are going to put the road in, it may be in their best interest to put it in at this stage because of the cost. • Mr. Prairie stated that then an office building that was not necessary. if they go ahead and relocate 64th Ave., and is never put in, they would have spent money Mr. Boardman stated it was a matter of planning. Once they package a facility to build an office building, they have a piece of property that can be packaged easier than if they had to go into vacations and the street was not in. He thought it was a7so a matter of commitment on the projact. The HRA has conrnitted to the c7inic project, and the clinic is cortmitted to a location on that site because of the other things that were happening. Mr, Boardman stated the HRA was promoting the office development and worked out the plans with the office develapment and Columbia Park Properties that this would be the best way to situate the office building and clinic in conjunction with City Hall and an outdoor plaza. Ne stated they have to cortenit to something in order to develop the Center City area. Mr. Cortaners stated he did not know how the HRA got into the position of being corrcnitted to this, because from the start the HRA was not too happy with the clinic building being in the location it is now. They would much rather have had the clinic located in another part of the Center City Project. Mr. Herrick stated that, as Mr. Boardman had stated, the clinic has made plans based on that layout. He felt it was too late for Columbia Park Properties to change the location of their building. He was always under the impression that the location of the clinic buiTding was based on the relocation of 64th Ave. At this point, the question the HRA has to answer is whether they want to create another building site by moving the road to the south. If they do not move the road, then they will not have another building site and they wi7] probably not have the best utiliiation of the praperty south of the existing 64th. If Columbia Park Froperties had assumed that 64th would stay as it is, he thought their piarts wauld have been different for utilization of that portion of the properf.y. He thought that, if they create the o`fice building site, sooner ar iater it �iil sell. The question is how long it will take. It didn't mean they couldn't move the road at a 7ater date, but this was probably the best price they are going to get. He stated Columbia Park Properties has expressed a desire to have the road relocated now so when the clinic is in operation, there will not be a street under construction. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AU7HORITY MEETING, JUNE 17 1982 PAGE 6 Mr. Prieditis stated that if the HRA canmitted themselves to the additiona] building site, then they are almost carmitted to do the relocation of the street right now. Mr. Boardman stated that when they looked at the overa7l area, they wanted to develop so the spaces that were created were exciting spaces. They talked about developing plazas and that was the basis on which they went out for competition of landscape architects, so the HRA'has committed to some kind of design criteria for this area. Mr. Commers stated part of the problem was communication with Columbia Park Properties. Columbia Park Properties made the mistake of locating their building on the property without the other project being approved. The office building location has never been approved by the HRA. All the HRA did was look at some preliminary plans for an office buildinq and say they were fine. Columbia Park Properties came in with plans, and the HRA approved those plans and entered into a contract agreement with comnitments, but they never committed to the relocatian pf 64th Ave. Mr. Prairie agreed with Mr. Commers. Mr. Herrick stated the crucial question was how the HRA wanted the Center City Project to develop ultimately. Did they want an office building on the north side of 64th? If they do, the road has to be changed. Mr. Prieditis stated he felt the HRA pretty much accepted the concept Mr. Boardman had presented to them. Even thougfi they never formally voted for it, he felt they had accepted it and, as such, they have this commitment and have to pay the c�nsequences by moving the street. He stated it is possible the HRA did not express themselves clearly enough. Mr. Prairie stated it is going to be difficult to discuss possibilities if they are going to be cast in stone right away. The HRA is going to have to be very carefu7 in the future. Mr. Commers stated it is a question of commitments that have been made, however those ca�nitments have been made. He stated they are comnitted to the clinic project itself, and they want it to be a good project. Ne stated there is a lot to be said for the way this has come up and the way it has been done, and there is no excuse for it, It has not been done in a proper manner. There was no understanding on the part of the NRA that they were committing and had cornmitted to a design development for the whole area. By approving the street relocation, he did not think they were cortmitted to how the rest of the area is going to be developed; and because ofi the fact that they have asked for bids on the Center City plaza, he did not Lhink that committed them to doing that project. He stated that is not the way the information is to be brought to the HRA, nor is it the way it should be comnunicated to people who want to parti- cipate in the developments. HOUSIN6 & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING JUNE 17 1982 PAGE 7 MOTSON BY MR. PRZEDITIS� SECONDED BY MS. SVENDSEN� TO APPROVE THE - R&7ACATION RND CHANGE OF 64TX AVENUE. -� UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARE'D THE MOTION CARRIED UNRNIMOUSLY. C: Approval of NSP Project in Connection with 64th Ave. Relocation (Memo #82-34 from Executive Director) :. MOTION BY M2. PRAIRIE� SECANDED BY MR. PRIEDITIS� TO RPPROVE THE NSP PROJECT IN CONNECTZON WITH THE 64TH AVENUE RELOCATION. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CIIAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY. D. Appraisal Reports (Memo #82-49 from Executive Director) Mr. Commers asked Mr. Herrick to summarize the status of the negotiations with Mr, Doty. Mr. Herrick stated that, as the HRA was aware, the HRA employed an appraiser to appraise the shopping center that Mr. Doty owns. The appraiser came highly recommended by the Minneapotis HRA. He stated the appraisal on the shopping center came in at $375,000. After receiving the appraisal. he and Mr. Boardman met with Mr. Doty. Mr. Doty took exception to two or three parts of the appraisal and thought the appraiser was low on some of the factors of the appraisal. The appraisal was for real estate and the buildings and pertinences that are associated with the purchase of real estate. Mr. Herrick stated there are some state and federal requirements for relocation assistance and personal property inventory. Mr. Boardman had advised Mr. Doty that he intended to emp7oy a separate appraiser to appraise the personal property and relocation expenses. In conclusion, they did reach an agreement with Mr. Doty, subject to HRA approval, that Mr. Doty be paid $40D,OD0 and that would include his entire claim which vrould be the real estate, relocation, and personal property. Mr. Herrick stated he felt comfortable in making the recommendation to approve that price for the following reasons: (1) The appraisal was $375,000. He had no doubt that Mr. Doty could secure a reputable appraiser who would give a higher • appraisal. If it went to court, it would be a jury case, and they have a tendency to arrive at a figure between the two appraisals. (2) The cost of going through condemnation. The City would face additional appraisa7 costs to have ihe appraiser testify. They wou7d have to pay for three comnissioners and under the law, a certain amount would be paid to Mr. Doty for appraisal HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, JUNE 17 1982 PA6E 8 of the property, and there would be attorney fees. Under the circumstances, he would rather see the HRA pay $400,000 than go to court and argue the real estate value plus paying the cost of condemnation and personal property and relocation. Mr. Commers asked if Staff was in agreement with that recanmendation and the acquisition price of $400,000. Mr. B�ardman stated he thought $4D0,000 was a reasonable figure. Mr, Herrick stated he secured from Mr. Doty a 30-day unilateral option in which Mr. Doty has offered the property to the HRA on the terms Mr. Herrick had described. That is a binding option, and the HRA has until July 15 to decide if they would choose to exercise the option. He stated he would reco�nend the HR,4 approve the option. MOTION BY MR. PRAIRIE� SECONDED BY MS. SVENDSEN� TD RPPROVE THE NEGOTIATED P�RCHRSE PRICE OF 5400,000 AND TO APPROVE THE EXECUTION OF TXE OPTSON AGREEMENT TXAT HAS BEEN NEGOTIATED WITH MR. DOTY BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAZRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CRRRIED UNANIMDUSLY. Mr. Boardman asked if the HRA wished to move on the offers for 332 and 336 - 64th Ave. Regarding the clinic, the delivery requirement for these properties is Dec. 15, 1982. He stated they have not initiated any contact with the owners of the properties, other than to let them know the HRA is in the process of acquiring property, and some appraisals have been done. At this time, the City has not made an offer or started any negotiations. It was the concensus of the HRA that the Executive Director go forward and enter into negotiations with the owners of 332 and 336 - 64th Ave. based on the appraisals that have been received. E. Letter from Barthel Construction - Update on Phase III Mr. Commers stated the HRA had received a letter dated June 8, 7982, from Laura Manske, Cortanercial Leasing and Development, of Barthel Constructian. Mr. Canmers declared the ]etter received into the record. He staied the letter was for the HRA's information regarding the negotia- tions that are proceeding with the supermarket that will be caning into that space and the desires on the part of the supermarket people to have a doubling of space as opposed to what was discussed in the initial project. Mr. Commers stated the project appears to be moving along. It appears that until�the supermarket commitment is made,it will be slow securing other tenants. but some are beginning to line up based on the securing of the anchor tenant. He stated that maybe in a couple of months, they could have Ms. Manske come to a meeting and give a verbal report on their progress. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, JUNE 17, 1982 PAGE 9 MOORE LAKE PRO�ECT A. Cheryl Nybo Project (M�no �82-50 fran Executive Director) Mr. Boardman stated the HRA members had a copy of the contract document and a letter of canmitment fran Eberhardt. Mr. Comners asked Mr. Boardman to summarize memo #82-50. � Mr. Boardman stated they have been contacted by Ms. Nybo who is still interested in d�ing the project. He stated the HRA did have a right of development with Ms. Nybo, but the HRA removed that right of develop- ment; however, the HRA left it open for the development of fhe office building if Ms. Nybo could put the package together. He stated he, Mr. Herrick, Ms. Nybo, and Ms. Nybo's attorney had a meeting and they came up with contract documents that are satisfactory, They feel they are ready to move on the contract documents. Mr. Herrick stated he did not think there were any areas of disagreement. The contract is similar to the development contract format they have used for other projects. The one major concern was the attorney for the project was concerned about the assessment requirement that would lock them into a stated assessed value. The attorney's concern was that if the building was not full, they would be giving up their right of appeal to the city, county, and state to have a reduction based on the income evaluation, What the attorney asked for was that rather than be tied to an assessed or market value, they be tied to a guarantee of taxes sufficient to repay the money that was advanced, Mr. Herrick stated that in this case, that would be relatively sma]1, because it was his understanding that the cost of the land with the existing building was relatively small in comparison to the title value of the building. Mr. Herrick stated the City didn't think that was a reasonable approach, but they reached a canpromise. What they did in appr�ximate fiqures was to say that under today's method of eva]uating the proposed building, the taxes would be approximately $52,000. They agreed they would permit them to appeal the assessed value of the building based on the lack of income if the building is not completely full, but under no circumstances could the taxes fa11 below $40,000 a year (which was approximately 75% of what they would be). Mr. Cortmers asked what they were talking about regarding the land cost. Mr. Boardman stated he took the appraised land cost and plugged that figure in. At this time, they did not talk about any reduction in land value, and that is a rt+atter of wfiether they are gaing to look at a reduc- tion in land value or not. The appraised value is around $45-48,000, and Ted Burandt, owner of the property, is looking at $65,000, a7though he will drop to $60,000 if he can have the building and move it off the site, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, JUNE 17, 1982 PAGE 10 Mr. Carmers asked what Staff's recomnendation was with regard to the land cost and what they do in terms of cost or write-down on this project. Mr. Boardman stated that unless Ms. Nybo can show the HRA she needs that write-down to make the project go, he would recomnend they work on the same basis, that is 100�. Mr. Commers asked Ms. Nybo if she had any cortments regarding':the real estate tax or the land cost. Ms. Nybo stated she was in agreement on the tax. She had not discussed the land cost formally with Mr. Boardman. Mr. Herrick stated that regarding the commitment ]etter from Eberhardt, the commitment is conditioned upon a pre-rental of 50% of the building, and the condition is that when the building is 50% rented, a major portion of the mortgage would be canmitted; and when it is 85% rented, the balance of the mortgage would be committed. He thought the HRA was going to have to give some thought to how they were goinq to handle this. The first question they have to determine is: Do they want to take any action in acquiring the property until such time as the building is 50% rented and the major contingency is removed from the comnitment? If they do, they want �o ask the individuals involved to guarantee the City and the HRA their expenses if the HRA does proceed and they are not able to satisfy the condition in order to get the mortgage. Mr. Commers stated they should probably do what has been done in the past-- expect and ask for a guarantee of the HRA's out-of-pocket expenses, other than the acquisition. Mr. Herrick stated he thought that would be the proper approach. Mr. Herrick stated, regarding the contract, one other change they agreed to make was that, rather than posting a performance bond, they agreed to accept a letter of credit fran an acceptable bank. Ms. Nybo's attorney felt this would be less expensive and easier to obtain. Mr. Herrick stated he had no problem with that. The HRA members agreed that was acceptable. Mr. Herrick stated it was his understanding the principa]s are proposing to proceed with a newly formed corporation, and he thought any guarantees they get should include personal guarantees as well as corporate guarantees-- a guarantee of the HRA's expenses if the project doesn't go forward and any other commtments that might be involved in the development contract. Mr. Boardman stated he felt the HRA was now in a position to approve the contract documents and set a time limit on actua] commitment of the financing. He stated it was his opinion that this was a good project and would be a good benefit to that area. The actual cost of the project to the HRA was very little in the sense of the amount of canpensation the HRA will get out of it as far as tax increment. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, JUNE 17, 1982 PAGE 11 MOTION BY MR. PRIEDITIS� SECONDED BY MR, PRAIRIE� TO APPROVE EXECUTION OF TXE CONTRACT DOCflMENTS WITH CHERYL NYBO. UPON R&CEIPT OF NOTICE_THAT THERE IS 50$ OCCUPANCY APPROVED 8Y TXE FINANCE COMPANY� STAFF HAS THE AUTHORITY TO MOVE FORWARD ON ACpUSSITION. IN THE MEANTIME� STRFF ZS TO �CONTINUE NEGOTIATIONS WISH MR. BURANDT AND NRS THE AUTHDRISY TO NEGOTSA2E A PRICE WITH RESPECT TO THE LAND RCQUISITION. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTSNG RYE, MOTION CARRIED UNANZMWSLY. COMMERS DECLAhED THE St. Philip's Project (Memo #82-51 fran Executive Director) Mr. Boardman stated the City has been working with the people from St. Philip's Church. St. Philip's proposal is for a 60-unit elderly facility. They are looking at the southwest corner of Central Ave. and Rice Creek Road for the location of this facility. St. Philip's is a sponsor for making application for 202 funds. He stated 202 funds are federal HUD monies for mortgages. There are funds available for fiscal year 1982. The app7ication is being made by St. Philip's as a non-profit organization, and the Ebenezer Society is assisting St. Philip's as consultants in putting the project together. The application wi11 be submitted to HUD on June 30. Mr. Boardman stated that as part of that application process, St. Philip's has to show tfiey do have some ability to control ownership, 7hat is where the HRA comes in for HRA support of the project. The HRA will have to give a right of development to St. Philip's in order for them to do the project. That right of development is similar to other right of developments, only they have to be a little more specific for HUD. Mr. Boardman stated that in the draft "right of deve7opment" letter to St. Philip's, it says the HRA does give the right of development to St. Philip's Church, and that "St. Philip's Church proceed to work on the submission of a 202 application to the Department of Housing & Urban Development". It a7so lays out the time period and states that if financing is approved, the HRA will take the necessary action to acquire the property. He stated they set up a basis for that acquisition and the acquisition costs are laid out in paragraph 4 of the letter. They also had computer runs done by Ehlers & Associates on the project based on estimated costs on the project--that they have a 60-unit building, the value of that building is $2,00�,000, paying an estimated $69,000 in taxes. Based on those conditions, they could commit $325,D00. That $325,000 is based on the bond run of $500,000, including the capitalized interest costs of $165,000. In addition to that, the City Council approved $]10,000 in CDBG funds for fiscal 7983 to be cortrtuoitted to tfie St. Philip's project. That comnitment is based an HU6 approval in Oct. HUD sets priorities and gives preliminary approval in Oct. Once pre- ]iminary approval is granted, the funds are released for c�nstruction next Oct. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, JUNE 17, 1982 PAGE 12 Mr. Commers asked for Staff's recortmendation. Mr. Boardman stated he would recommend the HRA proceed with the right of development to St. Philip's Church. He stated St. Philip's has done an excellent job on this and is trying to meet some of the needs that are in the City. St. Philip's is getting letters of support from the Community Development Canmission and the Human Resources Co�ission, approva7 at the Chamber of Comnerce Board meeting and a letter of support from. the Chamber of Commerce, and the City Council has taken a step also in providing CDBG funds. Mr. Canmers stated there should be sane kind of termination date at the time when St. Philip's is notified as ta whether or not funding was approved. Ms. Judy Lee stated she was with Ebenezer Society representing St. Philip's as their consultant. She stated the contract needs to be between the HRA and a corporation called "St. Philip's Human Services, Inc.", which is a new corporation recently formed by the church to be the owner and the borrower corporation on this project. Ms. Lee stated she wanted the HRA to know as�much as possible about this development, and that is that the amount of money HUD will 7end them, if their application is approved, is limited by fair market rent formula that HUD dictates and interest rates that are not yet announced. In essence, there has not been a project of this type developed that had any land cost associated with it for the last 2-3 years. They want the HRA to be aware of this and to know that if they get the mortgage money, it will most likely not pay any land cost, that all the money will have to go into construction costs. They are hopeful there are ways to explore to cover that land cost, whatever it is. Ms. Lee stated she had one other concern about the wording in the "right of development" letter. In paragraph 4 when they ta7k about "The purchase price to St. Philip's Church shall be determined by a Court established or negotiated value on the original acquisition...", she wondered if they would be able to include some statement as to the HUD appraised va7ue or a broader statement such as, "the price that is ultimately determined has to be approved by HUD",because that is a fact. Mr. Howard Helgen stated he is a member of the St. Phi7ip's co�nittee. He stated that because St. Philip's is a conduit on the project, they do not have any funds to carrnit to the project. He felt the pragraph should reflect the purchase price would not in any way involve any funds from St. Philip's Human Services, Inc. The money is going to have to come from some other source. Mr. Boardman stated he would work with Ms. Lee on the wording in the "right of develppment" document. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, JUNE 17 1982 PAGE 13 MOTION BY MR, PRIEDITIS, SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRIE, TO AVTHORIZE THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO GO FORWARD WITH A RIGXT OF DEVELOPMENT WITH ST. PHILIP'S HUMAN SERVICES� INC. - UPON A VOICE VOTE� COMMERS� PRIEDITIS� AND PRAIRIE VOTING RYE� SVENDSEN ARSTAININ,r,� CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CRRRIED. VI. FINANCIAL: � A. Check Register MOTION BY MS. SVENDSEN, SECONDED BY MR. PRIEDITIS� TD APPROVE TXE CXECIC REGISTER DATED MAY 12� 1982� IN THE AMOUNT OF S294�666,16 AND TXE CHECK REGISTER DATED JUNE 8, 19B2, IN TXE AMOUNT OF $182�307.38, UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHATRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. B. C�BG Funds Audit Report, June 11, 1979 - Dec. 31, 1981 Mr. Inman stated he would like to explain that some of the comments in the report are based on the analysis with which the original HRA accounting system was set up. The original accounting system was set up for very limited activities. They were well into a change in personnel in the City and into a number of transactions before he changed the process, C. Billing for HRA (Memo from Mr. Inman dated June 17, 1982) MOTION BY MR, pRAIRIE, SECONDED BY .�Q2, pRIEDITIS� TO APPROVE A PAYMENT, IN ACCORDINACE WITH THEIR�CONTRACT�OF SIS� 530.30 TD TNE CITY FOR REIMBURSE- MENT OF APPROPRZATE EXPENSES INCURRED BY THE CITY IN TXE ADMINISTRATION OF THE HRA, UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� CHAZRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY. D. Financial Report Mr. Inman reviewed and explained the HRA City Accounts/Funds, the HRA Funds, and Combining Funds, all dated June 8, 1982. Mr, Commers stated that, rather than having al] the funds comingled, he thought it would be useful for the HRA to know, an an informal basis, how they are doing and what is allocated for each project. Mr. Cormiers stated he did not think the NRA had any concern about being able to make interest payments. They may have a problem with the money when it is first due, and there might have to be some shifting of funds, but the problem is a long range or short range planning problem about where they would take the funds and where they would put them. He thought HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING JUNE 17 1982 PAGE 14 they should have sane kind of strategy or plan so that when money is needed, they are not caught not knowing what they have to work with in terms of what they are going to need on their other projects. Mr. Inman stated he did not feel the HRA would have any problems. He sta*.ed if the HRA wanted to proceed with the sale of the $600,000 bond, they will have to pass Resolution 4-1982. MOTION BY MR. PRAZRIE� SECONDED BY MS, SVENASEN, TO APPROVE RESOLUTIDN ND, NRA-4-I982, "R RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT RUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY TO REQUEST THE FRTDLEY CITY COUNCIL TO AUTXORIZE BOND SALES FOR THE CENTER CITY REDEVELpPMENT TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT PHASE II". � � � UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTIDN CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY. VII. OTHER BUSINESS: Meeting Date Change Mr. Boardman stated he would be out of town on Sept. 9, the HRA's September meeting date. He suggested the HRA change their meeting date to Sept. 16. The HRA members were in agreement with this meeting date change. ADJOURNMENT: Chairperson Commers declared the June 17, 1982, Housing & Redevelopment Authoriiy meeting adjourned at 11:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, yn Sa a Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEY ENERGY COMMISSION MEETIN� JUNE 22, 7982 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Saba called the June 22, 1982, Energy Cotranission meeting to order at 7:41 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present Members Absent: Others Present: Dean 5aba, Bill Wharton, Bill Jordan, Todd Tessmer Jerry Cichosz Bill Deblon, Associate Planner APPROVAL OF MAY 25, 1982, ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. WHARTON� SECONDED BY FIIt. TESSMER� TO APPROVE THE 1NAY 25� I982� BNfiRGY COMMZSSION MZNUTHS AS WRSTTEN. UPON R VOICE V02E� ALL VOTING AYE, UNANIMOUSLY. 1. CONTINUED: ENERGY ACCOUNTIN6 SYSTEM SABR DfiCLARED THE MOTION CARRIED Mr. Saba stated the Commission members had a copy of a memo from Sid Inman, Director of Central Services, to Bill Deblon, in which Mr.Inman stated his specific concern was the cost effectiveness of the program. Mr. Inman also stated the State Energy Agency has a version of an Energy Management System avai]able on the Apple Computer. Mr. Inman stated the City currently has an Apple used for character generation, and the City Council has recortanended they investigate the potential use of that canputer. Mr. Saba stated what the Commission is talking about regarding an energy accounting system is coming up with a program that will calculate energy costing, energy usage, and print out a report. The only immense amount of data would be the historical data. Mr, wnarton stated there are firms that are doing energy management progra�ning and making a nice living at it. There is a nominal fee to set this system up. He stated he would obtain an output form to bring to a Cor�nission meeting. The Carmission coutd then possibly utilize that form t� approach one of the vocationat schoois and ask if writing up a simple basic computer program for the City of Fridley's Apple Canp�ter could be a project for a computer c7ass. Then, it would be a matter of submitting the monthly utility bill data onto the computers. Writing the program is what is going to take the most time. ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 22, 1982 PAGE 2 Mr. Deblon stated it sounded like the State Energy Agency has an fnergy Management $ystem, and it is just a matter of getting that fran #he Energy Agency and running it on the City's system. Mr. Saba asked Mr. Deblon to contact the Energy Agency and try to get that set up. Mr.,Jordan stated it might be feasible to contact some of the large commercial companies that have total energy management and ask them if they would send the Commission at least the formats as to how they are handling their tota7 energy management. He stated he did not have too much confidence in the Energy Agency, and he would also like to see the Canmission look at something else, He stated he would be responsib7e for contacting sane commercial canpanies and asking them to send the Commission their canputerized programs. Mr. Jordan stated Dunwoody has a complete computer department that he has access to at any time. Ne stated he would be wil7ing to talk to the person in charge of that department and see if they would be interested in writing up a computer prngram as a class project. Mr. Deblon stated he would first like to see what the Energy Agency has available, and then he wil] get in touch with Mr. Jordan and the Coimiission and go from there. He stated he would continue to collect the mohthly energy data. 2. CONTINUED: STOP SIGN pOLICY Mr. Saba stated he thought the Commission needed to cane up with sane ideas for a stop sign policy. One of his ideas would be to cane up with sane kind of data and prioritize the elements of that data into d weight scale; for example, public safety would be No. 1, traffic flow, energy, alternate routes, etc. Mr. Deblon stated that at the last meeting, Mr, Saba had asked him to see if the Public Works Department had a list of criteria used in deciding whether a stop sign is or is not justified. Some of the criteria they use is from the Uniform Traffic Manual fran the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Some of the things that are taken into account are traffic volume, crossing traffic, pedestrian traffic, and unusual visual handicaps. A stop sign is not to be used to control speed or divert traffic, but he felt the City was at that stage now or beyond it. Mr. Saba stated he thought there were some good criteria in this materia7, In coming up with a policy, public safety has to be No. 1, but a majority of the st� signs are being used for speed control. -r�:_� Mr. Jordan stated he would ]ike some time to study this and try to cane up with some ideas for the next meeting. Mr, Saba agreed and asked each Corrmission rr�mber to write up their thoughts for discussion at the next ireeeting. He stated he vmuld also ]ike to find out what other legal signs are available for use in the City as alternatives to stop signs. ENERGY COMMISSIOry MEETING, JUNE 22, 1982 PAGE 3 Mr. Deblon stated the Cortmissioners roay even want to consider setting up some kind of procedure for the removal of an existing sign. Mr. Wharton suggested that, in addition to the Cortmissioners studying this and bringing ideas to-the next meeting, Mr. Tessmer be asked to try to come up with a model policy for the next meeting. Mr. Tessmer stated he would be willing to work on a model stop sign policy. Mr. Saba stated discussion on the Stap Sign Policy would be continued at the next meeting. 3, ELECTION OF CHAIRPERSON AND VICE-CHAIRPER50N FOR 1982-83: Chairperson Saba declared the nominations open for chairperson and/or vice- chairperson. MOTION BY MR. WHARTON� SECONDED BY MR. .70RD.lN� TO NOMINATE AND CAST R UNANIMOU5 anrlAT FOR D&AN SABA TO CONTINUE AS CHAIRPERSON AND FOR TODD TESSMER TO SERVE AS VICE-CHAIRPBRSON FOR 1982-83, UPON A VDICS VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� CXAIRPSRSON SRBA DECLARED THE MOTION CARF2IED 4. OTHER BUSINESS: Mr. Jurdan asked if there was anything the Comnission would like to do through cable TV in educating Fridley residents about energy conservation. Mr. Wharton stated maybe they could put together some kind of announcement that could be put on the public information channel and then updated once a month or so. Mr. Saba agreed that one of the biggest problems with energy today is the con- artists, and people are looking for good, honest information regarding their energy probiems and questions. He stated he thought they should parsue this. Mr. Jordan stated that since the Comnission meetings are open meeting, there may be people who wouTd l�ke to come and ask the Commissioners questions, but he wandered how many people even know the meetings are open to the public. _ _ _-'�..:� Mr. Saba stated he would like to put on the next agenda a discussion of the development of an educational program through cable TV and possibly some other media. Mr. Deblon stated the Ca��issioners did sponsor the showing of "The Forgotten FundamentaTs af the Energy Crisis° on cable �'Y and they have put articles in the City's quarterly newsletter. He stated the newsletter just caning out will urge people to get an energy audit which costs $70 and is offered by the ut9lity canpanies. —.� ENERGY COMMISSION MEETIN6; JUNE 22, 1982 PAGE 4 ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. WHARTON� SECONDED 8Y MR. TESSMER� TO ADJOURN TH8 MfiE2ING. UPON R VOICE YOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE� CHAiRPERSON SABA DECLARED THE JUNE 22� 5982� fiNSRGY COMMISSION�MEETING ADJWRN&D AT 9:OI P.M. Respectfully su`�. y Sa a Recording Secretary ' =-'��. �, CALL TO ORDER: CITY OF fRIDLEY APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 29. 1982 i Chairperson Gabel called the June 29, 1982, Appeals Canmission meeting to order at 7:34 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present Members Absent: Patricia Gabel, Alex Barna, Jim Pleme7 Jean Gerou, Leslie Coleman Others Present: Darrell Clark, City of Fridley Mr. & Mrs. Andrew Veres, 5608 - 4th St. N.E. Michael J. Pleme7, 7663 Taylor Ave. Dick Wiggin, Shakopee, Mn. - S& R Investment Co. APPROVAL OF JUNE 15. 1982, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUT MOTION BY 1�2. BARNR� SECONDED 8Y MR. PLEMEL� TO APPROVE THE JUNE I5� 2982� APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES. Ms, Gabel stated that on page 6, under "Other Business", the correct spelling of "Mr. Hereck" is "Mr. Herrick". UPO17 A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GRBEL DtCLARED THE MINUTES APPROVED AS AMENDED. � REOUEST PURSUANT TO REDUCE ING pany, .... , . 5511 MOTZON BY l�2. PLEMEL� SECONDED BY MR. BARNA� TO OPEN TNE PUBLIC HEARING. UPO27 A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CIIASRPERSON GABEL DECIJiRED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:36 P,M. �• Mr. Clark stated this is a repeat request. The first reqnest occurred in 1979 and was also for a 4-plex, At that time, the only variance requested was to reduce the f�ont yard setback from 35 ft. to 30 ft. The variance was approved in 1979, but since it has been more than a year since that approval, the variance has expired. � APPEALS COMMISSION MEETIN6, JUNE 29, 1982 PAGE 2 Ms. Gabel read the Administrative Staff Report into the record: AD(']INIS'PltATIVE STAFF REi'ORT SG�;,-�2-54-U6 �th Street ;d.E. A. PUBLIC PURP06E SL'[�f7ID IIY RN]�UIRII-4�7T: Section 2C�5.073, nl:, rer,uires a mininurn front yard setback of 35 feet in a r.ultiL:le rh�elling zoning district. R:blic raarpose :;erved la� this requirement is to alla•� for off-street parking withou� �zcroaching on the pwlic ri9ht-of-taay. Also for aesthetic con�ie2raiion to reduce the building "line of sight" encroachnen� into ihe neigt�oz's front yard. Section 2�5.073, 4, r3, requires a riinirniva eide yard of 35 feet where a side yzrd aauts a street of a corner lot. Public purl�ose served t7y this requirement is to maintain a higher degree of trafiic visibility and to reduce the "line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard. B. STATID HARDSHIP: "ihe site is lonr_, and narra� and is bordered on three sides by streets. t7e cannot meet tl�e side yard requirement. S�7ith approval of the variance, ��e will be eble to utilize this property to the highest and best use by coi�structir.n four 3-bedroor.l units, There is a shortage of 3 bedroo� units (ren u:ls) in the area." C. ADt•IINISTf2ATIVE STI�FF REVI�7: F> front y�rd vzric,:.ce of 30 ieet was apuroved � this property in F.ugust, 1979 �;iact: a r�crucst for tamhou�es taas p{oposed. The reason given for a?nrovai �r�s �o have the building line up with the ck�elling to the nor�h of u;is .:roperty. This lot is uor�ereu ori three sides b1 streets making it difficult to place a struct=ure a-, it tiaithout �craaching into the reguired setbacka. 'Ihe sL-ructure would have to be reduced in size to meet the Code. If tlie Corsaission r�:ot,raenJ:, a�rwal of these variances, -the staff reco,��tds that a lancscaping plan be sulxnitted sha�ing screening on the nortii cuul ti�e:: ten off-street �rking stalls be provided. a�:'; ADPEALS COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 29 1982 PAGE 3 Mr. Dick Wiggin, Shakopee, Mn., stated that since this was approved with a variance in 7979, they have attempted to draw the building plans on the same basis. He stated he has been to7d that the City of Fridley does not have zero lat lines for 4-unit buildings. Ms. Gabel stated that was correct; however, the City is in the process right now of drawing up a townhome or that type of zoning, but they don't have it at this time. Mr. Wiggin stated he has been developing land and building in the Twin Cities, mostly in Richfield, 67oomington, Burnsville, and for the last 15 years in Shakopee. He stated he was on an ad hoc committee that helped design a zero lot line. He thought it was going to be the caning thing, because the big problem the last 5-10 years is there have been very few apartment buildings built because there are only 4-unit mortgages. He stated the money has somewhat determined the building. Mr. Wiggin stated this will be a 4-unit bui7ding, 3 bedrooms in each unit, with tuck-under garages. Each unit will have a 2-car garage with 2 parking stalls in front of the garage, for a total of 16 parking stalls. Mr. & Mrs. Andrew Veres submitted a petition to the Appeals Cortmission. Ms. Gabel read the petition int� the record: "Petition to stop the consideration of a variance request pursuant to Chapter 205 of the fridley City Code to reduce the front yard setback on a corner lot from the required 35 feet to 30 feet, and the sideyard setback on a corner lot from the required 35 feet to 16.25 feet, at 5600 - 4th St. N.E „ Fridley" Ms. Gabel stated there were two identical petitions--one with four signatures and one with two siynatures. MOTZON BY MR.PLEMEL� SECONDED BY 1�2. BARNA, TO RECENE THE PETITION. UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY, Mr. Veres stated it was the neighbors' concern that all the houses, including the 4-plex be even, so they did not want the variance approved for the front yard setback from 35 feet t� 3Q feet. �• Ms. Gabel explained that the proposal is to leave the 4-piex in line with the houses, and that was the reason for the variance to 3D ft. All the houses along the block are 30 ft. fran the street, and the 4-plex would then be consistent with the houses. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETIN6, JUNE 29, ]982 PAGE 4 Mrs. Yeres stated the neighbors would have no objection to the buiiding as lortg as it was even with the houses, as that was their only major concern. She stated they are in favor of the bullding because the area as it is now is an eyesore. MOTION BY MR, BIlRNA� SECONDED BY ffi2. PL&'NEL� TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC XEARZNG. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRPERSON GABEL D&CLARED TXE PUBLIC XERRSNG CZASED AT 8:05 P.M. Mr. Plemel stated he would be in favor of granting the variances. He stated he thought the building wouid be a nice addition to the area. He did not think the variance to the south would cause any visibility problem as it is lined up with the buiiding across the street. Mr. Barna stated both variances seem to be what the neighbors want, and he did not see any objection from the neighbors. MOTION BY MR. BARNA� SECONDED BY aIIi. PLEMEL� Tp RECOMMEND TO CITY CWNCIL, THROUGX PLAITNSNG COMMISSION� TO GRANT TXE VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE FRONT YARD SETBACK ON A CORNER LCYl FROM THE REQUIRED 35 FEET TO 30 FEET� AND THE 5IDE YARD SETBACK ON A CORNER IAT FROM THE REQUIRED 35 FEET TO 26.25 FEET� 20 AL7AW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 30 BY 88 FOOT FOUR FAMILY DWELLZNG� SACA2ED ON 7ATS 13� 14� AND I5� BIACK 9, XAMZLTON'S ADDITION TO MECHANICSVILLE� THE SAME BEING 5600 — 4TH STREET N.E.� FRIDLEY, WITH TXE STIPULATZON THAT THE PETITSONER WORK WITH THE CITY BUILDZNG DEPARTMENT ON THE LANDSCRPE PLAN� SCREENING OF REFUSE CONTASNERS� AND THAT OUTSIDE STRLIS BE MARKED SO THEY ARE DEFINED. Mr. Wiggin stated he really does not need the variance to reduce the side yard setback from 35 ft. to 16.25 ft. on the south side unless the Canmission wanted it that way. Mr. Clark stated they should say it should line up with the building to the east, but cannot be Onre than 16.25 ft. from the south property line. MOTION TO AMEND BY AII2. BARNA, SECONDED BY �2. PLEMEL� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL, TNROUGN PLANNZNG COMMISSION� TO GRANT THE VARZANCE TO REDUCE TXE FRONT YARD SETBACK ON A CORNER LOT FROM TXE REQUIRED 35 FfiET TO 30 FEET� AND THE SSDE YRRD SETBACK TO BE ZN ALSGNMENT WITH TNE STRUCTURE TO THE ERST ON THE OPPOSZTE SIDE OF 9TN STREET, BUT NOT CZASER TXRN I6.25 FEET TO THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE� TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTZON OF A 30 BY 88 FDOT FOUR FAMILY DWELLING� LOCATED ON LfYl'S 13� 24� AND 25� BLOCK 4� XAMZLTON�S ADDZTION TO XECHANICSVILLE, THE SAME BEING 5600 4TH STREET N.E.� fiRZDLEY, WITX THE STIPULATION THAT THE PETITIONER WORK WITH�•THE CITY BUZLDING DEPARTMENT ON TNfi LANASCAPE PLAN� SCREENING OF REFUSE CONTAZNERS� AND TXAT OUTSIDE STRLLS BE MARKED SO THEY ARE DEFINED. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTSON CARRZED UNANIMOUSLY. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 29, 19B2 PAGE 5 ADJOURNMENT: NOTION BY M2, BARNA� SECONDED BY lII2, PLEMEL, TO ADJOURN THE MEETSNG. UPON A VOZCE YOTE� RLL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED TXE TUNE 29� i982� APPERIS COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:12 P.M. Respectfully sub 'tted, y e Saba Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEY HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING JULY l, 1982 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson van �an called the July 1, 1982, Human Resources Commission meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Mary van Dan, Brian Goodspeed, Peter Treuenfels, Jayne Noble, Lynn Boergerhoff Members Absent. None Others Present: Mary Cayan, Human Resources Assistant APPROUAI Of JUNE 10 1982 HUMAN RESOURCES COMINISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY �t. TREUENFELS� SSCONDBD 8Y MS. NOBLE� TO APPROVE THfi JUNE I0, I982� flUNAN RESOURCSS,COMMI5SSON MINUTfiS. Ms, van Da� stated that on page 2� first paragraph, "TDD" should be changed to "TTD". UPON .l VOICS VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON VAN DAN DEC.LARED TXE MSNUTES APPROVSD AS AMfiNDfiD. 1. NO-FAULT GRIEYANCE PROCEDURE TRAINING - REPORT: Ms. van-Dan stated the No-fault Grievance Procedure training session was held on Saturday, June 12, at Fridley City Hall. She stated that in addition to Mr. Treuenfels, Mr. Goodspeed and herself, there was a representative from each of the following citiesc Richfield, Rosevilae, Edina, Arden Hi11s, and Coon Rapids. Mr. Treuenfels stated the session started out with introductions and materials were handed out. He stated the morning was spent going over the various aspects of the Hwnan Rights Act and an explanation of some of the basics of the No-Fault Grievance Procedure. Mr. Treuenfels stated the No-fault Grievance Procedure is exactly what it says. Na attempt is made to find fault with anyone. The intent is to'go to the root of the problem by getting the two parties together, getting them to talk, and to try to come to sane solution satisfactory to both parties. That is essentially a11 the power that the local grievance committee woutd have. If a satisfactory solution cannot be reached, the matter is then referred to the State Department of HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING JULY 1 19$2 PAGE 2 Human Rights. He stated there is a time element that has to be watched closely because there is a statutory limitation of six months from the date of the alleged probtem and when the matter has to be submitted to the State Department of Human Rights. So, the 1oca1 group is ]imited essential7y to looking at the matter � for only four months; and if no satisfactory solution is reached at the 1oca1 level at the end of the four months, it is strongly urged that the matter go on to the State. Mr. Treuenfels stated that in the afternoon, tfiere were further discussions. Considerable time was taken on a test and a discussion of the test results. He stated one of the most exciting things of the day was when they went through one example of a grievance case, and those present at the training session actually played the roles as it might happen in real life and as it might be presented to the Commission as the local grievance committee. Mr. Treuenfels stated the Commission is now at the point where they need to make a decision--either to go ahead with the No-Fault 6rievarcce Procedure and present it to the Planning Commission and City Council, or to not proceed with the No- Fault Grievance Procedure. He stated that since two of the Comnission members had not been able to attend the training session. he would suggest they give these two members an opportunity to review the training material and they can discuss this at their next meeting. Mr. Treuenfels stated that regarding the liability to the City, he had consulted a 7awyer friend who has been working on the Human Rights Comnission in Brooklyn Center. and because of possible legal problems, that Comnission has decided not to pursue the Mo-Fau1t Grievance Procedure for the time being. He stated he atso asked the person from the State Department of Human Rights how many cases have actually gone to court against a city. That person stated that as far as he knew, there were none, The one possible area the person fran the State pointed out was the matter of the timing--by dragging things out, the Camiission could 7et a grievance go longer than the six-month period, and some 61ame could possibly be placed on the City. However� the way to overcane this probtem is to make up a release form (approved by the City Attorney) that both parties would sign that would exempt the City fran any l�ability. Mr. Treuenfels stated that, with any reasonable care, this prob7em need never arise. Ms. van Dan stated that because Mr. Treuenfets, Mr. Goodspeed, and she went through the training session and took the test, they are now certified to hear grievances. . MOTION BY MR. TREUENFEIS� SSCUNDSD 8Y MR. GOODSPESD� TO CONTINUE FURTXER DISCUSSZON OF THE NO—FAULT GRIEVANCS PROCEDURE AT TX8 NBXT MSfi4'S'NG. UPON A VQICE VOTfi, IlLL VOTING AYB, CAAIRPERSOP VAN DAN DECLNRTsD TAE MOTION CARRIED UNANIdIaC/SLY. �.a{'-,-,: HUMAN RESOURCES CON�IISSION MEETIN6; JUCY 1; 1982 ' PAGE 3 MOTIOA BY MR. TRfiUBNFEIS.�.SfiCONDBD BY MR. GOOASPS&D� SHAT IN VISW OF THE FRCT TfIAT TAE CITY I$ SAVING MONEY BY NOT FUNDZNG ANY�3ERVICfi ORGANIZATIONSI AND� �f�HSREAS� THE NUXAN RfiSDURCBS COMMISSION I5 SERIQUSLY CONSIDERING SfiTTING UP THS NO—FAULT GRISVANCS PROCSDUREr AND, WHfiRTsAS, IT BfiHOOVSS THE CSTY OF FRIDLEY R10 kBfiP ABREAST OF WHAT OTBSR COI�llMUNITIES ARE DOING IN THE ARER OF flUMAN RIGXTS, T88 BUMAN RSSOURCBS COMMISSION RECOIYAdBNAS TXAT T88 CITY OF FRIDLEY OFFICIALLY JO.IN TH8 LSAGUS OF AUMAH RIGHTS C�lISSIONS. UPON A VOICE VOT&, ALL VOTING AYfi, CXAIRPERSON VAN DAN DSCLARED TAE MOTION CARRIED UNANINOUSLY. 2. SERVICE OR6ANIZATION FUNDIN6 PROP05AL5: REVIEW Ms. van Dan stated the Commission's last meeting's minutes indicated the Gortmission's strong feelings about the City Council's decision to cut out all funding of service organizations fran the City's budget. At the last meeting, it was the concensus of the Comnission that they would coniinue to review the funding proposals and possibly recommend that the City Council reconsider their decision when the City Council is reviewing the budget. She stated that as they go along, the Commission may have recommendations or ideas on other ways of funding or ways that money from the City could be used for this area, possibly even questioning some of the priorities of where city money is presently being spent. Ms. van Dan stated that at the last Ptanning Camiission meeting, she got the positive feeling from all the Planning Comnission members that they did recommend the Human Resources Commission continue to go through the review process and did encourage the Human Resources Commission to make recammendations. Ms. van Dan stated the Corrmission had five funding proposa7s to consider: Central Center for Family Resources, North Suburban Famity Services Center, Southern Anoka Community Assistance, The Alexandra House, Inc., and the Fridley Creative P1ay Center. She stated they would hand]e each proposal in the order listed. - Central Center for Family Resources - Request for $5,000 The Central Center for Family Resources has cane to the City for the past two years for assistance. In 7981, 22% of the total and 32X of the family educat�on programs were Fridley residents. They anticipate 27% of the total will be Fridley residents in 1982. In averaging their scores, the Comnission came up with 75:2 �oints out of a possibte 100 points. - North Suburban Fami� Services Center - Request for $3;000=6;800 They anticipate serving approximately 120 Fridley residents in 1983 utilizing the sliding fee scale. In averaging their scores, the Cortmission came up with 5&.0 points out of a possib7e 100 points. HUMAN RESOURCES COhE�iI5SI0N MEETING JULY 1 1982 PAGE 4 - Southern Anoka Comnunity Assistance (S.A.C.A,) - Request for $2,500 They provided services to 385 Fridley residents out of a totai 887, so Fridley residents represent almost 50� of the people served, In averaging their scores, the Commission came up with 83.2 p0ints out of a total lOD points. - The Alexandra House, Inc. - Request for $3,000 According to their statistics, there are 330 women in Fridley who are considered battered women, 20 of them have gone ta Alexandra House for service. Where do the other 310 go? In averaging their scores, the Commission came up with 72:2 points out of a total ]00 points. - Fridley Creative Play Center - Request fOr $4;000 Of the 94 families served, 64 were Fridley residents, In averaging their scores, the Comnission came up with 64.2 points out of a total 100 points. Ms, van Dan stated the Commission recognizes that the City Council, because of financial probiems, has decided not to fund any service arganizations in 7983, but because the Commission recognizes that these organizations all have worthy causes and needs to be met. the Commission has continued the process of review- ing the funding requests. Based on their criteria, the scoring results for the five organizations requesting funding ranked in the following order: 1. Southern Anoka Community Assistance (S.A.C.A.) - 83.2 points 2. Central Center for Family Resources - 75.2 " 3. The Alexandra House, Inc. - 72.2 " 4. Fridley Creative Play Center - 64.2 " 5. North Suburban Family Services Center - 58.0 " Mr, Treuenfels stated he would reccmmend that if any funds became available, that S.A.C.A., Central Center for Family Resources, and The Alexandra House share in those funds. Ne had reservations about North Suburban Family Services Center and the Creative Play Center. He felt the Creative play Center could charge a little higher fee. Mr. Boergerhoff stated he scored the highest for the organizations he felt provided preventative-type services that could be seen as preventing problems in the frture and might even save the City or the County funds in the long run, The two organizations he rated the highest were Central Center for Family Resources and North Suburban Family 5ervices Center, because they provide counseling services that could be utilized by wanen from Alexandra Hoose or referred to by S.A,C,A. He stated S.A.C.A. was pretty special and was not realTy in competition with �y of the other organizations. .� HUMAN RESWRCES COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 1, 7982 PA6E 5 Mr. 600dspeed stated he gave higher priority to those organizations he thought had a good public image and that taxpayers would accept their money going towards, especially S.A.C.A. and Central Center for Family Resources. Ms, van Dan stated that S.A.C.A. also provides a preventative-type service, and she felt very strongly that S.A.C.A, is preventing people fran having more problems and going on welfare. S.A.C.A, has little. if no. return requests for help, although they do not know if someone would go on welfare or medical assistance later on. She stated that both S.A.C.A, and Alexandra House deal with crisis sttuntions. and it was sanething. not only the City of Fridley, but a7so the whole State,is going to have to face. Because of the poor econanic situation, the un- employment situations, and the cuts in funding in other areas, she felt there was gQing to be more stress on families. The increased family stress is causing the greater need for places like Alr�candra Nouse and the Centra] Center for Family Resources because they offer preventative serv9ces. She felt crisis and preventa- tive services were inter-related here. Ms. van Dan stated that, as Mr. Treuenfels had stated earlier. she also felt the Creative Play Center's fee is very minimal. People she knew who are partici- pating in tfie program are getting excellent resu7ts, so it is a needed thing; but she felt the Creative Play Center could participate a little bit more by increasing their fees--even consider the dou6ling of the fee. Ms. van Dan stated that, atthough there is a need for North Suburban Fami]y Services Center, it was her opinion they have a lot more funding sources available. NOTION BY M2. TRfiUENFBLS� 58CONDED BY MS. NOBLE, TD RECCI�IMEND TO CITY CWNCZL TBAT� DfiPENDIHG UPON THE AVAILABILITY OF ANY FUNDING MONIBS, THE HUMAN RESOURCES Cq�➢VISSION WrOULD RBCQNMfiND S.A.C.A.� CfiNTRAL CfiNTER FOR FAMIiY RESOURCES� AND T$B AZ3XANDRA AOUS& RfiC8IV8 TN8 11HOUNTS OF MONISS REQUESTBD: S.A.C.A. — S?,500 CfiNRRAL CENTBR FOR FAlIZLY RBSOITRCBS —$5�000 . THE ALBxANDRA HOUSE — 53�000 Mr. Cayan stated she receives calls from people in the community with serious finaneial and/or emotional difficulties who have no idea where to ga for help so they ca71 their local government. She stated she refers these people to what- ever organization she feels can best help the situation, but referral sources are diminishing as varioys funding reductions continue to eliminate programs in this area. UPON A VOICE VOTB� ALL VOTING AYB� CBAIRPERSON VAN DAN DECLARED TAE !lOTION CARRSIs'D UNNVIXODSLY. The Commission mernbers agreed that although there are not yet any statistics to support the exact impact of state and federal cutbacks, they felt a signifi- cant proportion of Fridley's popu7ation who are users of t6ese kinds of services will not be able to get help fram these orpanizations because of cutbacks. and the added iocal cutback of funds. The City has a responsibility to these people just as much as they do to those people in the carmunity who are interested in. for example. recreation. HUMAN RESOURCES COWMISSION MEETIN6, JUCW 1, 7982 PAGE 6 The Commission members agreed there are possibly other areas in the City budget that could be reduced. The Canmission would respectfully request that the City Council review other areas of the budget that might be reAuced with the possi- bility of trying to gather dollars fran various places to get the amount of dollars needed to fund the three organizations recommended by the Comnission. The Canmission vauld also recommend that if the City Council feels they are not going to be providing funding of any type in the future, they make this decision publicly known so that organizations do not spend any time or money going through the funding request process, and, therefore, have the opportunity to look elsewhere. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MS. NOBLE� SSCONDSD BY MR. TREUBNFfiLS, TO AA70URN TXE MEETING. UPON R VOIC& VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON VAN DAN DECL�lRSD THE JULY S� 1982, XUMAN R&SWRCES COMMISSSON MEETING ADJWRNED AT 9:20 P,M. Respectfully subm�, ,j yn Sa a Rec rding Secretary , j_, , i' CITY OF FRIDLEY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING JULY 6, 1982 CALL TO ORDER: Vice-Chairperson Schreiner called the July 6, 7982, Parks & Recreation Commission meeting to order at 7:36 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Mary 5chreiner, Dick Young, Dan Allen M�bers Absent: Dave Kondrick, Jan Seeger Others Present: Charles Boudreau, Parks & Recreation Director APPROVAL OF JUNE 1, 1982, PARKS & RECREATION COFAIISSION MINUTES MOTION BY MR. YOUNG� SECONDED BY MR. ALLEN� TO APPROYE THE JUNE I� 1982� PARKS 6 RSCREATION COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, VIC&-CHAIRPERSON SCXREINER DECLARED THE MOTION CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: The following items were added to the agenda: Briardale Park - Ytem A under "New Business" Date of Meeting - Item B under "New Business" Northeast Chamber Ensemble and City Band - Item C under "Old Business" MOTION BY A!!t. ALLEN� SECONDED BY I�t. YOUNG� TO APPROVE TXE AGENDA AS RMENDSD. UPON A VOICE t�OTE, ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHASRPERSON SCHREINER IECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. l. DIRECTOR'S REPORT: a. Conmunication - Councilman Barnette Dr. Boudreau stated the Commission members had received a copy of a ]etter from Cou�cilman-at-Large Bob Barnette and a copy of a letter from Todd Pierson, Staff inember af Westwood Elementary School, in which Mr. Pierson and the school staff thanked Mr. St. Clair and the staff at Springbrook Nature Center for an excellent program. �. , PARKS & RECREATION COFMISSION MEETING, JUCY 6, 1982 PAGE 2 Dr. Boudreau stated that in Mr. Barnette's letter, Mr. Barnette was inquiring about the use of the nature center as far as the tota] operat- ing maintenance costs and programs for 1981-82, the user fee schedule, if any, and the policy on the use of the facility by "other than Fridley" residents. Dr. Boudreau stated Mr. Barnette was at an earlier co�nission meeting held at the nature center where he had requested this same information. Dr. Boudreau stated he had informed Mr, Barnette at that time that after the nature center has been in operation for a complete year, he would be able to supply Mr. Barnette with detailed information as far as the opera- tion and maintenance costs. Dr. Boudreau stated the nature center has only officially been open since October 1981, Dr. Boudreau stated that Mr. St. Clair has been directed to prepare a user fee schedule for the nature center and the programs, generally geared toward the school population, and Mr. St. Clair will present that to the Cortmission at their next meeting. Dr, Boudreau stated that regarding a policy for use of the facility by "other than Fridley" residents, the Commission will he starting the process of developing a policy manual and Staff will be giving its recomnendation on the use of that facility by "other than Fridley" resi- dents. Dr. Boudreau stated he has verba]ly cortmunicated these things to Mr. Barnette, and Mr. Barnette was in agreement that after one year of operation, he would like the answers to his three questions. MOTION BY AfR. YOUNG� SfiCONDSD BY MR. ALLEN� TO RECEIVE TXE COMMUNICATION FROM MR. BARNETTE TO DR. BOUDREAU DATED JUN& 15� 1982� AND TO DIRECT STAFF TO RESPOND TD MR. BARNETTE THAT AFTER ONE YEAR OF OPERATION AT SPRINGBRODK NATURE CENTER, STAFF WILL SUPPLY MR. BARNSTTE WITH DETRILED INFORMRTION REGRRDING TH8 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS AND THE POLICIES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHRIRPERSON SCAREINER DECLARED THfi MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Young stated he would guess that if a random survey was made of the people at Moore Lake Beach on a weekend, they would find that a vast majority of those people are not Fridley residents. Yet Mr. Barnette does not raise any question as far as city expenditure of funds to provide a swimning area for non-residents. b. Crnronunity Park - Update Dr. Boudreau stated the grading is finished on the City's section of the carmunity park. The irrigation is going in and should be completed by the end of the week. The backstops are gaing in and should be com- pleted in 1-1� weeks. The whole area is scheduled to be seeded within � PARKS & RECREATION C01�1ISSI0�! MEETING, JUtV 6, 1982 PAGE 3 two weeks after the irrigation is working. He stated he would encourage the Carrnission members to take the time to walk out into the complex to really appreciate what it is going to be like when it is completed. He stated it is going to be a very attractive area, and he was glad they have taken the time to do tf�e jo6 correctly. c. Anoka County Ordinance Dr. Boudreau stated the Commission members had received a copy of a new ordinance by Anoka County, which was an attempt to stop the keg parties in the county parks. He stated this was for the Commission's information as he thought they should be aware of this new ordinance, because the County does cooperate with the City by maintaining L�cke Park and Islands of Peace. d. Springbrook Pond Development Dr. Boudreau stated the Commission members were familiar with what Mr. St. Clair had talked about at the April 6 Commission meeting regarding the pond development at Springbrook. He stated they have sent to City Council a packet of information including a copy of a memo from Mr. St. Clair regarding the "Permanent Pond Development Improvement Needs", maps, excerpts from the Springbrook Nature Center Foundation minutes of Mar. 2, 1982, and excerpts from the Parks & Recreation Commission minutes of April 6, 1982, on this subject. He stated the Corrrnission members also received this information. It was for their information and record and no further action was needed by tf�e Commission at this time. 2. NEW BUSINESS: a. Briardale Park Mr. Allen stated Briardale Park is right across the street from his hane. He stated there has been a lot of work by Staff as far as land- scaping, turf, and a sidewalk system in the park. Right now, they are in the process of building an open air shelter. He stated he has heard many favorable comments from the neighborhood, and several peop7e asked him to pass along their appreciation and admiration to the Parks & Recreation Qepartment staff for a job well done. Mr. Allen stated that if alt the neighborhood parks develop like Briardale, the City is going to be in good shape. Dr. Boudreau thanked Mr. A1len for the positive comments. . b. Date of Meeting Mr. Allen stated the Tuesday meeting date has become a problem for him, and he wondered if there was a better time of the month for the Canmission to meet, or the possibility of the Commission meeting less often than once a month. He would suggest the Gommission discuss this at the next meeting. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING JULY 6'1982 PAGE 4 Ms. Schreiner stated this was briefly discussed at the last meeting, and it was her feeling that the Commission should continue to meet once a month, especially if t6ey are going to be working on a policy manual. Dr. Boudreau stated that at the last meeting, he had suggested the Commission meet quarterly, because it was very frustrating for Staff to be at work all day and then come back ta a meeting in the evening to sit with an advisory comnission that has only three members out of five. He stated thfis is supposed to be a recreation advisory coRrrnission to help Staff. He was not saying that three members couldn't help Staff, but if a Commission is supposed t� have five members, he felt five members' i�ut was better than three. Maybe meeting once every three months was less to ask of a volunteer appointed commission member. Mr. Young stated that if the Commission went to a quarterly meeting time, he would probably lose interest in the Comnission, He definitely felt the Co�nission should meet on a montfily basis. He stated the two times he has missed was because of a work conflict. Dr. Qoudreau asked that before the next Corrmission agenda is mailed out, the Cortmission members send him a brief synopsis of their best meeting times so he can have those typed up and included in the next agenda. Ms. Schreiner stated this would be put on the next agenda for discussion. 3. OLD BUSINESS: a. Proposed Capital Outlay Request 1983 Dr. Boudreau stated that at the 7ast meeting, he had asked the Commission members to review the proposed capital outlay request for 1983 and bring any comments or recaimendations to his attention at this meeting. He stated he had already presented this to the City Council. Dr. Boudreau reviewed the propased capital outlay request and indicated the items he had deleted at City Council. He stated the new capital outlay totals were as follows: Park Division - $123,876 (was $183,876) Natural Resource Division - 10,478 was $76,747) Recreation Division - 10,850 was $12,910) AfOTION BY tIIi. YOUNG� SECONDED BY MR. ALLEN� TO APPROVE THE RMENDED CAPZTAL OUTLAY REpUfiST PQR 1983 AS PRESENTED. UPON A VOICfi VOTE� ALL VOTING AYEo VICE—CHAIRPSRSON SCHREINER DECLARED TAfi MOTSON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 6 1982 PAGE 5 b. Policy Manual Development Dr. Boudreau stated he had sent the Comnission members some information out of a textbook, "Creative Administration in Recreation and Parks" by Joe Bannon. He stated this information would give the Commission members an idea of what Staff is talking about when they refer to policies and a manual. He had also copied an index and a page out of a policy manuat actually used in the Glenview Park District in Illinois. He felt this was the type of thing they are talking about in a policy manual and it gave some idea on how a policy manual is written. Dr. Boudreau stated he had also included the Parks & Recreation Commission's "Purpose, Scope, Program, and Funds" as established by City of Fridiey Ordinance No. 606 on Jan. 5, 1976, the "City of Frid]ey Parks & Recreation Department Philosophy Statet�ent", and the "Departmental Po7icies for Recreational Leaders" developed by Staff. Dr. Boudreau stated that if each Cortmission member ►�ou1d choose an area he/she was interested in working on, then Staff would get together with each member to discuss these areas. Then, each Comnission member would come up with a rough draft of a policy for each area within a month. Mr. Young chose the area of "Participants", Mr.Allen chose "Program", and Ms. Schreiner chose "Administration" and "Community Relations". Dr. Boudreau stated he felt this was going to be a good exercise for them all to get involved in, and he was eager to begin. Ne stated he would appreciate a call from each Cormnission mem�er to set up a time to discuss these areas. He stated he wou7d contact Mr. Kondrick and Ms. Seeger. c. Northeast Chamber Ensemble and City Band Mr. Young stated it was braught to the attention of the Corrmission recently that the Northeast Chamber Ensemble had requested $1,600 from the City of Fridley for the coming year, In the past, he has not been opposed to the City's funding the City Band or the Northeast Chamber Ensemble; but in ]ight of the City Council proceedings on June 7, 1982, he would like to go on record as opposing any continued funding of these two organizations and possibly any other such organizations in the future. Mr. Young stated he was referring to Item 6 of the June 7 City Council minutes regarding the "Community Service Organization Funding for 1983". He stated the Comnission may feel this is a prejudice viewpoint because he fs the President of Southern Anoka Gapmunity Assistance (S.A.C.A.), but fr�n a moral point of view, he did not think the City can continue to fund persons who are interested in cultural pursuits and deny correnunity assistance to those who are less fortunate. � PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 6, 1982 PA6E 6 Mr. Young stated that at the June 7 City Council meeting, the City Council decided to deny any funding to service organizations that are meeting the needs of citizens of our caimunity. He stated S.A.C.A, was not the only organization denied funding; they also denied funding to Central Center for Fami]y Resources, North Suburban Family Service Center, The Alexandra House, and Fridley Creative Play Center. Mr. Young stated that in lieu of the financial situation, the City should consider reducing funding for such things as the Northeast ' Chamber Ensemble and the City Band when the City is denying funding for the health and wellbeing of citizens of our community. Mr. Young stated it may be that because of financial cutbacks the City is facing (6-8�), they should possibly consider reducing the funding provided to the f.Y.S.A. to offset the cost of umpires, etc. Mr. Young stated he has been involved in this community for 12 years working with people of a71 ages and handicapped people, and S.A.C.A. is near and dear to his heart. He did not think the City cou7d deny things to the 7ess fprtunate and then provide for the cultural pursuits of others. Mr. Young stated that right now S.A.C.A. is serving about 30 families per month in the City of Fridley, either providing th�n with household goods, food, clothing, or financial aid. By figuring an average family of three people, that is 90 people per month, 1,080 peop7e per year in the City of Fridtey being served by S.A.C.A. He stated these people are what they classify as the working poor, those who are going from week to weei�, who do not qualify for public assistdnce in many cases, but need that little extra boost. Yet, the City is continuing to fund a group where the people could probably afford to pay something in order to parti- cipate in the City Band or Northeast Chamber Ensemble. Anyone else who wants to participate in a city function must pay to participate. From information he has gotten, people do not pay to participate in either group. He stated he would also like to know how many people actually belong to each group, and if it is 7imited to Fridley people or is open to anyone. Dr. Boudreau stated that from the Parks & Recreation Department Staff's viewpoint, the City Band is a traditional function that was started in Fridley and was underwritten by the City to get it started. It is some- thing that has been continued throughout the years, and no one has ever questioned the validity of it. The first question brought to their atten- tion was it was one of two vulunteer groups that utilizes city funding to pay for leadership. Leadership is not paid for in the F,Y.S.A. or the Hockey Association. He stated that, traditionally, most city bands are strictly valunteer groups. He stated they have an obiigation fran the City Band to provide six band concerts for the playground programs each summer, but outside of that, the City has very little to say about the City Band's operation. , ..� PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING; JULY 6, 1982 PAGE 7 Ms. Schreiner stated she felt Mr. Young had raised a very good point, but she would like to have some more information before the Commission took any formal action. Mr. Allen stated he felt this was definitely something the Cor�nission should look into further, but there were some questions he would like answered: (1) the names of each service organixation denied funding and the amount of monies reqyested by ea�h organization; (2) the exact amount of monies funded to the City Band and Northeast Chamber Ensemble; and (3) the composition of the City Band and the Northeast Chamber Ensemble. Dr. Boudreau stated he would get this information. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. YOUNG� SSCONDED 8Y MR. ALL&N, TO AATWRN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CNAIRPERSON SCHREINER DECLARED THE JULY 6� 1982� PRRKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETSNG ADJOURNED AT 9:36 P.M. Respectfully subm'tted, '�r.� �� y eSaa Recording Secretary � City of Fridley ' AGENDA PLANNING COM�1ISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY JULY 14, 1982 7:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: APPROVE PLANNING COhQ�1ISSI0N MINUTES: JUNE 23, 1982 1. PUBLIC NEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR A SPECiAL USE PERMIT SP #82-083 BY JAMES H. CROSS: Per Section 2�5.051, 2> A, of the Fridley City Code, to allow the construction of a second accessory building, a 22' x 24' attached garage on Lot 4, Block 1, Irene Henry Addition, the same being 6271 Jackson Street N.E. (Variance granted 6t15t82>.subject to approvai of SUP) 2. VACATION RE UEST: SAV �i82-01, BY�.S A R INVESTMANT COMVANY: Vacete that'portion of unused right-of-way adjacent to the west side of Lots 13, 14 and 15, Block 4, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanitsville, (highway turn-back),-to allow the cof�Struction of a 4-plex, the same being 5600 4th Street N.E. (Appeals Commission recort�nended approval of variance on June 29, 1982) 3. LOT SPLIT REQUEST• L S. #182-04 BY A. OSCAR CARLSON: Split Split off the Westerly 8 feet of the vacated alley adjacent to Lots 20, 21 and 22, Block 7 Onaway, and add it to the Easterly 8 feet of vacated alley adjacent to Lots 5, 6, and 7, Block 7, Onaway, the same being 7753 Beech Street and 7752-56 Elm Street N.E. 4. RECEIVE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES: JUNE 15, 1982 5. RECEIVE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT All1HORITY MINUTES: JUNE 17, 1982_ 6. RECEIVE ENER6Y COMMISSION MINUTES: JUNE 22, 1982 7. RECEIVE APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: JUNE 29, 1982 8, RECEIUE HUMAN RESOURCES MINUTES: �UI:Y 1, 1982 A. See motion to Council on funding of Service Organiz�tions 9. OTHER BUSINESS: ADJOURNMENT: ... . _ �. �,� --�.._._ ' � 3 - 'fAGg2 . . ,.__`. , � `•�� A � � :: • . t � i . . • � / �� 11 : � - � _ A . �� 1 � R,erital • � .i 1. % �`Y,;� �` At kast 60,000 new smsIl rcatal uoiu could be croated in tix Twin C+tia meuopolitan uea by modifying ezistins housing, without jeopard'uing the ehu- acter of single family neigtibofioods, according to tt�e I.eague's Rental Houffing Committee. The committee ilso said that neigh- borhoods could control just how man�' new units are added by being pemiitted to tnde, �etl. or othecwise exchange conversion righu—similar to the way commerciaT and historic properties ex- change deve(opment rights today. The flexible converaon right ryriem waz one of three stntegies the committce identified u ways to permit more ux of existing housing riock in angle-famtl) neighborhoods. The committee also identified two other sirategies which would allow greater use of existing housng riock: Through zoning changes or special and conditional ux permits, communities could allow the converseon of angle- family houses. Using these tools, com- munities could attach conditions to pro- posals to add units, insuring the character of neighborhoods would not change. These stratepes should be vigorously pursued as a way to handle fhe bulge in rental housing demand likely to occur in tl�e 1980s, the cortunittce said. Under the converaon rights plan, zoning ordinantts would be changed to allow conversions under specific condi- tions, and eacti homeowner would be allouted r percentage share of a oover- sion. My homeowner wishing !o add a rental unit to Lis house would have to amau enough ahares from his �ighbo�s to total one complet� conversion +ight before he could add a mit to h¢ houx. Officials might, for example, decide to permit five comersions for every 20. housc area. Each house woutd be given one•tourth of a conversion share. My homeowner who w�nted to convert his house would have to obtain conversion shares from three neighbors in order to be � allowed to add a rental unit. Shares C011� �G lTldEd� bOU�li, �CBiCd, p�, OI pven �wry• � 1'6e strategy would illow neighbor- hooda to gain primary contml over the number of additional rental units that would be pemtitted in their neighbor- hood, and would altow grcater �ex�bility t6an a �hmge in the zoning codes which could �llow any md all �omeowners �o coaverG ' '1'kEEMENDOUS OPPORTUNIT�S FJOST If one of every ten houses in the wburbs aere converted, 28.00U new rentsl units would be added to the housing dock of the Minneapolis-Ssint Paul metropolitan area, according to the comminee. Addiag two units per blodc would produce nwrly 60,000 new nntal units, o� approximately oneahird of ihe 178,000 new houflng units the Metro- politan Council projects the region wa11 nced in the 1980s, the committce said. Conve�on opportunities ue proxnt in every communitY but especially ia the wburba Nearly '10 perant of the singk-family fwwes in the ngion are located in the suburbs, most of them in areas zoned for single-fam�7Y P��P�s &cauae mort new jobs are expecied to be crosted in the suburbs, the crcati� of new rcntal uniu therc is especislly imFortmt ' SEVERAL STRATEGIES AV AILABIE $esdes the oddilion of rental uniu in existing dngk-famly structures, t6e cortunittee identified aeveral other rtntegies to get more rental units on the market without new const�uction. Rrotal ot Existing Spax. Owners of angle-fam�ly homes could simply rent out space, with no atructural or other altera- tions to their houses. h'ezdy alt com- � munities in the regic:� -'�o� uals wit6 conditions, the rnmr "In the five-coun_, - :rea there may be at least 140,000 empry bed- rooms (just in houxs with three or more bedrooms), which could be rented out;' the committee said.'"fhese rooms could l�ousc full� 34 percent of all the pcople who will tum 20 in the 1980s" Adding Units to Existing Apartment Buildings. The committee estima�ed r8ughly 5,300 units conld be added to existing apartment buildings in the two centrai cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul. The cost per unit was peFged at SS,000-120,000 by people who testified before the committec. Adding units to existing apartment buildings would not affect the character of neighborhoods, since tl�e neighborhoods alrcady are uud for multidamily buildinp,c, the committee aaid. Rehab�itation of Existing Vacant B�uldin�. Some 1,800 rental units in the area have been vacant for more than ax months, according to the 1980 census. Getting these units onto the market would help, the committee said. Allowing "Echo" Hou�ng. "Echo" or add�on units may be feasible on large subufian lou on which the house occupies only part of the land. CARE NEEDED Qd CONVERSION OPI70NS Any atrategy to atlow the addition o( new rental units to angle•family struc- tures to add new rental units should be accompanied with ordinances to safe• guard the character of neighborhoods, the committee said. Adequate sewer and water supplies should be available for the added popula- tion, the committee said, and them must be enough off-street parking to accomo- date new people. Exterior alterations should not bc allowed if they would cliange the char- acler of the neighborhood, and accessory units shoald bc dcarly subordinate in sizc to the existing principal dwelling. Finally, the committee said it is (HOUSING continucd on Page 3) -� (HOUSCVG continued from Page 2) imp�,run: to retain the owner�occupied chancter of singledamity neighbofioods, w owner occupancy should be rcquired in con�ersions. The committee acknow- kdged the existena of constitutiona] ques�ions surrounding the requirement of owneroccupancy. GREAT DEMAND FOR REN'fAL SPACE SEEN "Hnw to wpply decent, af(ordable rcmal housing will be a major issue for ihc Twin Ciiies area throughout the 19rOs.° the repoR said. � Many young people of the baby boom c.nrra�ion wiil enta the housing market n�i thc firsi timc in thc 1980s, the ;omruii�ez said. In addition, household siie has been faliing. As a result, housing drmand has increased cven in communi- ues rith stable populations as many more zmaller households have formed. Thc committee said both of these fa.iurs ha�e increased housing demands. Meanwhile, ihe new housng supply has no� kept pace. Fewer new ttntal housing units are being added to the rc�ional supply now than were being addcd annuslly in the early 1970s. Morrover, it is becoming morc and more difficult for families to become new homeowners. The increase in demand and the timita- tions on expansion of supply have added up to an increasingly tight rental housing market, One positive factor the committee found is the new families being creaced tha� need housing are small funilie:, usuall� one or two persons, and can cherefore be accommodated by eon- rrrsions, add on uniu, and the other sirategies �he report endorses. Whle demand tor rcntal units is ezpened ro increase throughout the 19SOs, demand may decreau in the 1Q90s, turther wpporting a flexible use sua�cp� , the committce uid. The Rental Housing Supply Com- mittee wu chaired by David Ziegenhagen. Cummitter members were: Duane N.�jack, Jnan Christensen, Ann Copeland, [hnnii Danie}s, Dan Feidt, Garry Hesur, Sallc Ho(meistcr, Carl lohnson, Anar 1:-rr, Sandra Kresbach, J. Dudle�' A4.��{an. Patrick O'Leary, Nurma Ofson. D��id Ordus, Christupher Owens, Sieve R,w�d. Susan SanJs, peborah 5.�: ncicmmm. Gotdun Stephenwn. P�i;;;;, S�ccens. Peier Thoreen. Atark il,�•w�n. il��mas Narnci. Annr N'cbb, l,�hr, MI•.ic�l.c�. and Cc:i{ Yuun_. PAGE 3 Demographic Trends Vital in Chartirig Housing Needs The new CL rcport on rcntal housing recommends expanding rental opportuni- ties throu� mom fle�cible and creative use of the existing houang slock. It dces not recommrnd a crash contruction program to build a lot of new rental housing. This recommendation is based in part on the demogi'ephic trends which the region will experience in the 1980s and 1990s. According to Metropolitan Council projections, the number of people in the Metropolitan area tuming 20 in the I980s will be about 405,000, some 15,000 more than tumed 20 in the 1970s. These people are the ones who have traditionally looked tor rental opportunities. During the 1990s, however, the num- ber of people in the re�on tuming 20 w�71 decline sharply, with 100,000 fewer people entering this age group during that decade than will during the ]980s. Because of the dramatic dropoff in people tuming 20 in the 1990s, a need was seen for a sVategy to cope with the bubble in rental housing demand which will owur in this decade. Many new rental units aro not needed in the roBon forever, but mainly to handle the popula- tion group which wil1 need rental oppoi- tunities in the 1980s. A previous L.eague study said new housing construction should be aimed at the ovec 45 market, ihe empty nesters. By building housing for empty nesters snd creating opportunities for them to move out uf the lazger, singie family houses with a lot of unused space, new houang opportunities would open up for young families with children who need a (ot of space. Once again, demographic trends supQort thi5 strategy. The Metropolitan Council estimates that 113,000 more people will tum 30 during the 1980s than did in the 1970s. M additional 393,000 persons will reac6 that age in the 1990s. Creating incentives for the over 45 group to move out o( their larger single family houses is likely to incrcase housing opportunities for the new home buying fsmilies in their 30s. So, new home construction in the region should be simed at the over 45 group to free existing housng stock to meet the demands of changing population. Eighteen People Served as `Faculty' to Housing Group 77�e joliowing 18 people appeared before the housing rnmmitree, and are liued h�e, showing their job titles o� positions m tFe nme ojthev oppemance. Am�stmng, Patty, councilwoman, City of Cottage Grrne Ballentme, Cbarla, unior planner, housing, Metropolitan Council Bracken, Will, builder, Northco Company Butlec, Sasidra, member, Mendota Heights Planning Commission Fartell, Mary, realtor, Dan Dolan Realtors Ford, Kea, principal planner, ikpartmrnt of Ecunumic Development, City of Saint Paul Harris, Richard, chairman, Fridley Plan� nin^ Commission Housle��, Riley', builder, Kelrob Corp. Hunt. RuA�. councilwoman, Ciq' of Saint Paul La�son, James, pre�ident, Stevens Court, Inc. Law, Ridc, partnei, Peat, Maruick & Mitchell Lukermana, Bsrbua, planning consul- tant, Hubert H. Humphrey [nstit�tc of Public Affairs Reevee, Nancy, director, Metro Housing & Redevelupment Advis�ry Com- mittee, Metropotitan Council Robbins, Kent, director, Housing Devel� opment, Whittier AlGance $o1em, )im, direcror, MN Housing Finance Agency Taddi7cen, Irene, wle proprietui. Homc Restoratioo Enterprise� Tremere, Blair, direc�or, Pianning a Community Development. Cit�� ot Plymouth Tros[el, Parker, former slderman, Cit� of Minneapolis � � ll t � � � CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSIOP� MEETING, JULY 14, 1982 CALL TO ORDER: Uice-Chairperson Oquist called the July 14, 1982, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:31 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Mr. Oquist, Mr. Saba, Ms. Gabel, Mr. Svanda, Mr. Kondrick, Ms. van Dan Members Absent: Ms. 5chnabe7 Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner James Cross, 6271 Jackson St. N.E, Jim Benson A. Oscar Carlson S & R Investment Co. APPROUAL OF JUNE 23, 1982, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� S6CONDED BY MR. SABA� TO APPROVE THE JUNE 23, 5982� PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTE'S AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DEC.T,RRED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP�$2-08, BY JA�hES H. CROSS: Per Section 205.051, �,�, of t�Fridley ity Co e, to a ow t e construction of a second accessory building, a 22' x 24' attached garage on Lot 4, Block l, Irene Henry Addition, the same being 6271 Jackson Street N.E. (Variance granted 6/15/82, subject to approval of special use permit) MQTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARSNG ON 5P #82-OB BY JAMES H. CROSS. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� YICE-CHRIRPERSON OQUIS2 DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:33 P.M. Mr. Boardman stated this 7ot is the last lot on Jackson Steeet. It is a dead-end street with a cul-de-sac. He stated the request is for the addition of a second garage. The request to the Appeals Commission on June 15 was to construct the new garage and turn the existing garage into a living area which would require a variance from 10 feet to 5 feet from the north property 7ine, because the existing garage as it is now is 5 feet off the property line, At that time, the neighbors were not opposed to the construction of the new garage, but were opposed to the PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 14, 1982 PAGE 2 existing garage being converted into living space and requested that both garages be used as garage space. The petitioner had stated he had no problem with allowing the existing garage to remain a garage. This then required his coming in for a special use permit, because the code doesn't allow second accessory structures of 200 sq. ft, without a special use permit. Mr. Boardman stated the petitioner is reauesting a specia7 use permit for the construction of a new garage and to allow the existing garage to remain a garage. He stated Staff has no problems with this request. He feli it was appropriate since this house is at the end of the street and the setback variance in front was granted by the Appeals Commission. The petitioner, Mr. James Cross, stated this was the only location they had on the lot to build an additional garage, and they really need the storage space. The only alternative would be to store their vehicles in the yard or on the street. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR, SABA� TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SP �82-08 BY JAMES H. CROSS. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED TXE PUBLIC HEARZNG CLOSED AT 7:4I P,�. MOTION BY MR, SABA, SECONDED BY MS. VAN DAN, TO RECOMMEND SO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP �82-08� BY JAMES H. CROSS, PER SECTION 205.OSI, 2, A, OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO ALIAW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SECOND ACCESSORY BUILDING, R 22' X 24' ATTACHED GARAGE ON LOT 4, BLOCK 1, 2RENE HENRY ADDITION� THE SAME BEING 627Z JACKSON STREET N.E, (VARIRNCE GRANTED 6/15/82� SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT). UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTSNG AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Boardman stated this request would go to City Counci7 on July 26. 2. VACATION REQUEST: SAV #82-.pz, BY S& R INVESTMENT COMPANY: Vacate that portion of unus� right-of-way a �acent to the west si e of Lots 13, 14, and 15, Block 4, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville, (highway turn-back), to allow the construction of a 4-plex, the same being 5600 - 4th Street N.E. (Appeals Commission recommended approval of variance on June 29, 1982) Mr. Boardman stated this property is located on 4th Street where the service drive connects into 57th Ave. It is a corner property. He stated the State originally had control of the right-of-way all along the service drive, but the State recently turned all that property over to the City of Fridley. The City of Fridley does not need the property so at the request of the petitioner, Staff is recommending this property be turned over to the property owner, but that the City maintain a 10 ft. boulevard easement. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 14, 1982 PAGE 3 Mr. Boardman stated the proposal is for a 2-level, 4-plex with tuck-under garages. This proposa7 went to the Appeals Commission on June 29 for approval of two variances--a front yard setback from 35 ft. -0 30 ft, and a sideyard setback from 35 ft. to 25 ft. Both variances were approved by the Appeals Corr¢nission and are bing submitted to City Council. Mr. Boardman stated it was Staff's recanmendation to approve the vacation and turn the property back to the property owner to make a more usab7e 7ot. Ms. Gabel stated the Appeals Commission has approved variances before for the development of this piece of property; but because of financing falling through and other things happening, no deve7opment has iaken place. She fe7t that if there is now someone who can do something with that lot, it would be a good thing for the City. MOTION BY MR. SVANDA� SECONDED BY MR, SABA� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF VACATION REQUEST� SAV #82-02, BY S& R INVESTMENT COMPANY TO VACATE THAT PORTION OF UNUSED RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO THE WE5T SIDE OF LOT5 I3� Z4, AND 15, BLOCK 4, HAMILTON'S ADDITION TO MfiCHANICSV2LLE, (HIGHWRY TURN-BACK), TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 4-PLEX, THE SAME BEING 5600 - 4TH STREET N,E. (APPEAIS COMMISSION RECOMMENDI;D APPROVAL OF VARIANCE ON JUNE 29� 1982)rW2TH THE STIPULATION THAT THE CITY RETAIN A IO FOOT BOUL&'VARD EASEMENT, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Boardman stated this request will go to City Council on August 16. 3. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #82-04, BY A. OSCAR CARLSON: Split off the le� ster yT 8 feet of the vacated alley adjacent to Lots 20, 27, and 22, Block 7,Onaway, and add it to the Easterly 8 feet of vacated a71ey adjacent to Lots 5, 6, and 7, Block 7, Onaway, the same being 7753 Beech Street and 7752-56 Elm Street N.E. Mr. boardman stated there was quite a history as to how these two buildings were connected. He stated the proposal is to purchase the building that has been spread out across an alley and covers two lot areas, one off Beech Street and one off Elm Street, and then split the building, turning over a portion of the building on Lots 21 and 22 to the building on Lots 6 and 7. Mr. Boardman stated where the problem comes in is that because they are putting a new lot line in and there was never a zero lot line variance for a bui7ding setback to a property line (which was not necessary at that time, because the property in between was owned by the building owner), the petitioner is also going to have to request a variance. Because of scheduling, there is somewhat of a problem with the variance procedure and it wouTd be mid-September by the time it gets to City Council. The reason for this is the meetings of the Appea7s Commission and Planning Comnission do not jive in order to get it to the City Council by the end of August. If the Planning Commission approves this lot split, he would suggest they recommend the lot split requesi be conditioned upon the variance approval by the Appeals Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 14, 1982 PAGE 4 Mr. Oquist asked why the two walls couldn't be knocked out and the area turned back into an alley. Mr. Jim Benson stated he has been involved back to the time these buildings were connected and is now representing Keith Boulais and A. Oscar Carlson, who are the new owners. He Stated that when the two buildings were connected together, the walls were constructed of concrete masonry, the floors are poured concrete floors, so it is fully improved real estate. He stated that when you are inside the building and passing from one building to another, you hardly realize the buildings were ever separated. He stated it would be too expensive to tear up the concrete floor, concrete walls, and roof, so the 7ogic is just to detach the b�ilding and bring it back and concrete the wall up, making virtually two separate buildings again. This would create a zero lot line situation, which is common in the Onaway District. He stated the two buildings were originally huilt separately, so everything is separate--parking lots, utilities, water mains, etc. MOTION BY MR. SABA� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF LOT SPLIT REQUESTr L.S. �82-04� BY A, OSCAR CARLSON� TO SPI,IT OFF THE WESTERLY 8 FEET OF THE VACATED ALLEY ADJACENT TO LOTS 20, 21, and 22, BLOCK 7, ONAWAY, AND ADD IT TO THE EASTERLY 8 FEET OF VACATED RLLE% ADJACENT TO LOTS 5� 6, AND 7� BLOCK 7� ONAWAY, THE 5AME BESNG 7753 BEECH STI2EET AND 7752-56 ELM 5TREET N.E.� BASED UPON THE APPROVAL OF THE ZERO LOT LINE VRRIANCE BY THE APPEAIS COMMISSTON, UPON A VOICE VOTE� RLL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, Mr. Boardman stated the zero lot line variance request will go to the Appeals Commission on Aug, 1�, and then both the variance and the lot split request will go to City Council on Aug. 16. 4. RECEIVE JUNE 15, 1982, ENUIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. SVRNDR� SECONDED BY MR. SABR, TO RECEIVE THE JUNE Z5� I982� ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON R VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHAIRPER50N OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. RECEIUE JUNE 17, 1982, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MOTION BY MS, GABEL� SECONDED 8Y MF2. SVRNDA, TO RECEIVE THE JUNE 27� 1982� HOUSING & REDEVELOPME'NT AUSHORITY MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUSST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. RECEIVE JUNE 22, 1982, ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY MR, KONDRICX, TO RECEIVE THE JUNE 22, I982, EN&RGY COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOSE, ALL VOTZNG AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 14, 1982 PAGE 5 %. RECEIVE JUNE 29, 1982, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MS. VAN DAN� TO RECEZVE THE JUNE 29� I982� APPEAIS COMMSSSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUISS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. RECEIVE JULY 1 1982, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. VAN DAN, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO RECEIVE THE JULY Z, Z982, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES. Ms. van Dan states she had gone to the July 12 City Council meeting, because the City Council had received the Planning Comnission's June 23 minutes which included a motion and discussion regarding the funding process. She stated there were a number of very impassioned, good presentations from the public. She stated Barbara Hughes spoke representing the citizens of Fridley as well as a board member of one of the organizations. Dick Young, President of S.A.C.A., gave an excellent presentation, and there was a representative fran The Alexandra House. She stated a number of organizations gave presentations. She staied both Peter Treuenfels and Brian Goodspeed from the Human Resources Commission spoke, and she also spoke. Ms, van Dan stated they were a71 real7y emphasizing two areas: (1) The fact that the City Council's decision not to do any funding was done so suddenly after all tf�e applicants had gone through a very lengtF�y and expensive process of pre� senting funding requests. If the City Council fe7t they were not going to do any funding in ]983, they should have given prior notice; although the Mayor and the Council members did indicate they felt it was an understood fact that city funding was not going to be an ongoing permanent funding process and that it could be stopped. She stated somewhere along the line communicaiion has not been the best, because she felt it was understood there would be funding if funds were available, but no one expected the funds to be cut short so unexpectedly. (2) They questioned priorities and respectfully requested the City Council to sincerely review some of the things being considered in the 1983 budget and to remember that people are the most valuable human resource in the community and anything the City can do to maintain the dignity and the welfare of the citizens of the community should be considered. Ms. vam Dan stated that in the July 6 Parks & Recreation Commission minutes, Dick Young had questioned the validity of the City providing funding for the city band and Northeast Chamber Ensemble. She stated she had not been aware there was that kind of funding. Ms. van Dan stated one of the important things in the funding process is that the Commission encourages the organizations to go out to every possible source of funding, and these organizations do. However, many funding grants are based on community support, such as matching grants, so if the community does not give anything, the organizations lose double. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING; JULY 14; 1982 PAGE 6 Ms. van Dan stated that at the City Council meeting, she had the feeling that all the Council members understood the concerns being expressed and indicated they may really give this serious consideration at the time of budget review, Ms. van Dan stated the Human Resources Commission members have all expressed the opinion that the funding review process is the most interesting meeting of the whole year. She felt if the Commission has been asked to take on the responsibility of reviewing funding requests, they should be involved in the whole process for any type of city funding and not jusi the service organizations. Ms, van Dan stated the Human Resources Commission rea7ly felt very strongly that S.A.C.A. is a very worthy project and shou7d get as much support from the City as possible because 50% of those served by this organization come from Fridley. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DEC.LFIRED THE MOTSON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION BY MS. VAN DAN� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO CONCUR WSTH THE MOTION MRDE BY THE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION RND TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL THAT� DEPENDING UPQN THE AVAILABILITY OF ANY FUNDING MONIES� 5.A.C.A., CEN2RAL CENTER FOR FAMILY RESOURC�S� AND THE ALE'XANDRA HOUSE RECEIVE THE AMOUNT OF MONIE5 REQUESTED: S.A.C.A. - $2,500 CENTRAL CENTER FOR FAMILY RESOIIRCES -$5�000 THE ALEXANDRA HOUSE - $3�000 UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUISS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANSMOUSLY. 9. RECEIVE JULY 6, 1982, PARKS & RECREATION CQMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR, KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. SASA� TO RECESVE THE JULY 6� Z982� PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� VICE-CHA2RPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANSMOUSLY. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MS. VAN DAN� SECONDED 8Y MR. KONDRICIC� TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE JULY 14� 5982, PLANNING COMMISSSON MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:I0 P.M, Respectful7y subm tted, �}( �/ /� y_��!Yl��'�C u�i� L Recording Secretary