The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 08/18/1982 - 6781City of Fridley AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 18, 1982 7:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: AUGUST 4, 1982 1-� 1. PASCHKE: Rezone from M-1 (light industrial areas) to C-2 general business areas), Lots 4 and 5, Block 3, University Industrial Park, to be part of a new shopping area on University Avenue, the same being 7941 and 7981 Racher's Road N.E. 5- 2. RECEIVE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MTNUTES: AUGUST 3, 1982 GREEN Two motions to Council - One on fee schedules One on selling park land to to Mr. & Mrs. John Zurawski 6767 7th Street N.E. 3. RECEIVE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 5, 1982 SALMON 4. OTHER BUSINESS: A�JOURNMENT: CITV OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETIN6. AUGUST 4, 1982 CALL TO ORDER: Chairwoman Schnabel called the August 4, 1982, Planning Comnission meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Ms. Schnabel, Mr. Oquist. Ms. Gabel, Mr. Svanda, Mr. Kondrick, Ms, van Dan Members Absent: Mr. Saba Others Present: Jerr�ld Boardman. City Pianner APPROVAL OF JULY 74, 1982, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. SVANDR� TO APPROVE TNE JULY 14� I982� PLANNING COMMISSION 1NINUTES AS WRITTEN, UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRZED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. REVIEW �F SECOND DRAF7 OF PROP05ED ORDINANCE TO REPLACE CHAPTER 211 PL TTING BY CHAPTER 2, SUBDIVISION: Mr. Boardman stated the Planning Comnission is not required to take any action on anything other than Section 205 of the City Code; however, Staff did want to bring this to the Planning Commission for their review and comments prior to its going to the City Co uicil on August 16. Mr. Boardman stated the Platting Ordinance is controlled somewhat by Minnesota State Statutes on platting. There were some changes that were recomnended by the State Statutes, and with those in mind, Staff went through the platting ordinance. He stated Staff is in the process of going through all the codes, the platting ordinace being one of those ordinances. While they were making modifications according to the state law and modifications according to the zero lot line, they went through the rest of the ordinance and tried to clean up the language so it was easier to read and easier to clarify what a subdivision is. They are saying a subdivision is any platting of land, any registered ]and survey. or any lot split. He stated that in the old ordinance, there was a lot of con- fusion in the language, so they tried to set it up in an order where they first have some related definiti�ns, and, secondly, have a 7ay-out of what a subdivision is and under what condit:ons are required to follow this ordinance es far as a subdivision. Mr. Boardman stated that before, any time anyone split a parcel of land that was under 2� acres, that person was required to go through a platting process. According to state law, that has been changed to 5 acres on any commercial/ industrial property and 20 acres or larger on any residential property. PLANNING CON�IISSION MEETING, AUGUST 4, 1982 PA6E 2 Ms. Schnabel stated that under "Lot Split" on page 211-05, she noticed the elimination of the notification of adjacent neighbors. It seemed to her that a lot split sometimes has a very great impact on adjacent neighb�rs. Mr. Boardman stated that under state law, a public hearing is not required for a lot split. Ms. Schnabel stated she thought there should be notification on a lat sp]it for the neighbors' protection. Mr. Boardman stated if a lot split doesn't meet City Code, it requires a variance, and a variance requires notification. But if the lot split meets all the qualifi- cations of the City Code, then the question is why should a lot split affect the neighbors and why should there be a notification to the residents? Ms. Schnabel stated she thought with a lot split they double the neighborhood density on that particu]ar parcel of land, and it happens unbeknownst to the existing neighbors. She just felt that notification to the neighbors would be the proper thing to do. Mr. Svanda stated that in looking at the timing of the p]atting process, they are looking at a minimum of six months to go through the process. He felt that process was too long. Mr. Boardman stated state ]aw allows them 120 days to go through the process. Mr. Svanda stated he would just like t� see that process a little shorter, just to speed it up for the project propoer who typically has a lot at stake. He felt that the more time you allow, the more time you take. Ms. Schnabel noted that under "Application" on page 217-08, no fee was mentioned. Was there a plat filing fee? Mr, Boardman stated there is a fee. He stated he would check into that and be sure that it is stated somewhere in the ordinance. � � Mr. Boardman stated there are sane modifications being done right now to the Platting Ordinance. He stated they have gone through and relooked at the pro- visions that have all been crossed out in this draft. The reason they relooked at the provisions was because none of these provisions are in the state code, and these provisions are things the City of Fridley requires. He states some of these provisions wil7 be put back in; however, they did leave out "alleys" as they are not trying to promote alleys. Mr. Boardman stated he would give the C�mmission mem6ers a fina] copy of the ordinance after the City Counci7 reviews it and gives their final approval. MOTION BY MS. VAN DRN� SECONDED BY 1�2. XONDRZCK� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL THRT� IN THEIR DELIBERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER 2II ENTITLED �SUBDNZSION�� THEY REVIEW TXE PLANNING COMMISSION'S SUGGESTIONS AND COMMENTS 1NADE IN THESS NINUTES. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETIN6 AUGUST 4, 1982 PAGE 3 UPQN A VDSCE VOTfi� ALL VOTING AYE� CHASRWOMAN SCNNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. DISCUSSION OF YIRGIL HERRICK'S MEMORANDUM ON SPECIAL USE PERMIT VARIANCES nr�nretur rueurrc. Ms. 5chnabel stated one of the key statements in Mr, Herrick's memo af Aug. 2, 7979, that the Planning Cortmission must remember when they are recommending approval or denial of a special use permit was on page 3, bottom of page: "Where zoning ordinance expressly authorizes a proposed use by special use permit in the discretion of the governing mody of a municipality, a denial of the permit must be for reasons reldted to public health, safety, and general welfare." Ms. Schnabet highlighted the following statements from Mr. Herrick's memo: Page 4-"In short, a denial would be arbitrary, if it is established that all of the standards specified by the ordinance as a condition to granting the permit have been met." "Where a special use permit is issued subject to conditions, the conditions must conform to the following standards: '...to protect the public health, safety, convenience and welfare, or to avoid traffic congestion or hazard, �r ather dangers, or to promote conformity of a proposed use with the character of the adjoining property and uses, and the district as a whole, or to protect such character.' Section 205.196." Page 5-"The appiicant for a special use permit has the burden of proving that the proposed use would meet the standards required by the ordinance for issuance of a speciat use permit." Page 6-"Failure of governing body to record contemporaneously the facts and legally sufficient reas�ns for its denia7 of special use per- mits constitutes a prima facie showing of arbitrariness in the denia7." Under II. Variance: Page 8-"The applicant has the burden of proving undue hardship due to unique circumstances and that the granting of a variance will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance. The Court of Zy]ka v. City of Crystal, supra, noted that an appli- cant for a variance has a much heavier burden of proof than an appticant for a special use permit." Under III. Rezoning: Page 11 -"A rezoning is reasonable and not arbitrary when it has a reason- abie relationship to the promotion of the public health, safety, order, or welfare." PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 4 1982 PAGE 4 "5imilarly, a rezoning classification is not disc�iminatory if is reasonab]y based in the public policy to be served." "A rezoning is confiscatary where it results in the taking of a private property right for a pub7ic purpose without due process and without compensation." Page 72 -"Rezonings, therefore, have been challenged on the ground that property areas in the area affected invested in their property in reliance upon its then existing zoning as well as upon the zoning classification in force in neighboring properties or in neighbor- ing areas, and that a rezoning which changes that zoning depreciates the value of the land and is unconstitutional as confiscatory. There is, however, no merit to this contention." 3. RECEIVE JULY 20, 1982, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTZON BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRTCK� TO RECEIVE TXE JULY 20� 2982� RPPEALS COMMISSION MZNUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRWpMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSEI+.,. 4. RECEIVE JULY 15, 1982, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. OQUZST� SECONPED BY MS. VAN DAN, TO RECEIVE THE JULY 15� 1982� HOUSING 6 REDEVELOPMENT RUTHORZTY MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHRIRWQMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. RECEIVE JULY 21,1982, SPECIAL HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITV MINUTES: MOTION BY MI2. OQUIST� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO RECENE TXE JULY 21� 1982� SPECIAL HOUSZNG & REDE[�ELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNRBEL DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADJOURNMENT: 1NOTION BYJ�i. OQUIST� SECONDED BY MR. XONDRSCK� TO AAlOURN TX£ MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHRIRWOMAN SCNNABEL DECLARED THE RUGUST 4� 1982� PIANNSNG COMMISSION MEETING AA70URNED AT 9:15 PM. Respectfully submi ted. cJQ. yn Sa a Recording Secretary AMENDED NOTICE PLEASE IJOTE: THIS ITEM WI i NOT BE HEAR� UNTIL AUGUST 18TH. 1982 - 5 PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE SAME TIME: SAMF PIAfF� PLANNINr, COMMISSION Notice is fiereby given that there will be a Pub1i� Hearin9 of the Planning Comnission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, July 28> 1982 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 P.M, for the purpose of: Consideration of a Rezoning Request, ZOA #82-04> by G. W. Paschke, to rezone from FI-1 (light industrial areas) to C-2 (general business areas), Lots 4 and 5, Block 3, University Industrial Park, to be part of a new shopping area on University Avenue, located in the South Half of Section 2, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. Generally located at 7941 and 7981 Rancher's Road PJ.E. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given art opportunity at the above stated time and place. VIRGINIA SCHNABEL CHAIRWOMAN PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: July 14, 1982 July 21, 1982 L' Planning Comnission 7-13-82 7-is"-p3- City Council MAILING LIST ZOA �82-04 G. W. Paschke Rezone Lots 4& 5, Block 3, Wniversity Industrial Park Robert H. Schroer 7620 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 G. W. Paschke 7260 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Rice Creek Associates 6279 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Park Construction Co. 7900 Beech Street N.E. Fridley, Mn55432 Gerald P. Bury 7479 Able Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Bryant-Franklin Corp. 800 County Road D New Brighton, Mn 55112 ' '.' y R�i'tiv =� e� ♦ :�' 4,q �.: —x ru^,.M � � 8r . .i` ` CITY OR FAlOLHY� s4a� �mnvewsirr wve. nw. iA1DL6Y• MN. 6.�49E (B'0 57'�-�� E�T ZONING ACTION ZOA 8 '-YACATION SAV N � ` � PLAT � �PS B � ORDINANCE NO PUBLISHED r � ` _ �j ('Cu,� �-- .c'� �""/ ADDRESS 7'�1 �/ �� P I �C'c� C� /IG�-�-- DATE ?��^-'' - PLANNIN6 COMMISSION: APPROVED _DISAPVROYED DATE `��r9�BY N0. CITY COUNCIL: PUBLIC HEARIN6 DATE iST READ 2ND READ CITY COUNCIL• . APPROYED OISAPPROYED DATE � PAf�1C FEE REQUIRED: AMqUNT PAID - STIPULATIONS: - ; NAME .; ��RECEIPT N%SG.Z- tSTREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY ! e ��51EGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERT �i S ec-K � `�� PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION EXISTING USE OF PROPER7Y �'�U�-� ACREAGE AF PROPERTY ' c� ` DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROPOSED ZONING CLASSIrF-ICATION OR TYPE OF USE AND IMPROVEMENT PROPOSEa GDc� Y1� M �"�!' i�a S V1 �� P/� C� �. �'�. ,�, e�— L7"� .3. - /�, y � ' ' Has the present applicant previously sought to rezone, plat, obtain a lot split or variance or special use permit on the subject site or part of it? _�yes � What was requested and when? The undersigned understands that: (a) A list of all residents and owners of proper- ty within 350 feet must be attached to this application (rezoning), 300 feet, (plat- ting). must be attac�ed to'this 8ppt5cation. '(b) 7his application must be signed by all owners of the property, or an explanation §iven why this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any defect in the proceedings resulting from the failure to . list the names and addresss of all.residents and property owenrs of propgrty in question, belongs to the u�dersigned. A sketch of proposed property and structure must be drawn and attached, showing the following: 1. North direction. 2. Location of the proposed structure on the lot. 3. Dimensions of property, proposed structure, and fron and side setbacks. 4. Street names. 5. Location and use of adjacent existing buildings {xithin 350 feet). The undersi�ned hereby declares that all th �s d resentati n stat d in, this application are true and correct. DATE Z �6 Z— SIGNATURE ` • ,,, ,� ��,� No��i —/=,�GG / ♦ N �.ocAT 1 ON . ,.�. � — KrZrw m w[�raA ..,� pAi lY[ M �� 1,•, _ �� .._R. �,�, STREET MAP-CITY OF FRIDLEY � '-`�`� f �I I+ 4 3�' N� �� , �oe ol �I J � r � `� �11 � - ' -- -- 3 � � � � ? � n � < p� b � ol s �^ N 6� 40l � ai ��r_� J i. 42 — 4 �S Pi'5l'� 1C � � / 1 I � I 4 NI { � � �� I � � 22t �a � I o°I �I 0 NI .� �� i � y N NN 0� � � t. C - 0 Z I I /, 1�` 3p� o� � �� Nd �I $ �I Z N "I °S I � � � 8�: 1 33 33 S�r�� 0 G� �°L � Il2.l'�_ _ � i Q� - '�. � � age+„ 1qTM �,' � v^ Ot p w � L � �� _ -i 'L � W . rQ �� 200.00 1�:� �� ,�� i � � r I� ��, ///�� I '.- [�J \ / � `_ � . �i'� . t� I = ` ,� 3 , � � _�� 3 r.. �s; �. �____ « . n., � nn \ " � �z5r1� 53$'W ��"55 I `j�� ; 9 �� I i I A I , � �; �-- � � � � �, �� , - - W -' 20I. 99 ^ K 5'?8"u! - - = - =-1 2 j I C� I �I �1� v a i '. c �. , a � � C] i ,,,; � - - ' 3P� W G2 ' w � �: � .v' a '.'^`Dc 1 � o � �`.� o �a ` Z �, i N Y�9`25�'�iP� W 'rS9� � �O i �2 N.a'ra'xs'e.� j � G , �o �• 1 / d - � /.b � � 6 /� N � � `P . �^°'w; � � a� � i Qr, ' ° , � : -'-°�o.ay' >�So� 3q- -- �m ----- 0�8 � \ � A 102A1 �.o.i _� £ � N. G�. i � i HW ' 7 z� � i / .. / ��, \ ^p`�`�FAh � � � I � 4T � � ��.�,10 �f �O � �^ � �hv I 6. .�1 M ?by �� M D* I . � ; zs �`�, � � a �\ � , `a` S \ �''io I d � + i,; •/�,,��,�%, � V \ � ��'�.° �� C-Z I 7'v a.h°' I F � � ��b� ��IL3.o3 I�O � 8 < '` -"1v� N � c —� 40, �i� — � � .--�/ m ��.c. N SFi°'LS'Sl"�1 � '� — ho�� .��+4 op TwE t�W`11 op TKt hW `�4 �> op hscr,or 2�TOWr��jMIPt7�� AY�(�� 2�. � U w � ,n n ��T r� �� L7 Lj y!_ L� �.1 p �� /� ^✓ D I'� 4 4; � ,� % , y � CITY OF FRIDLEY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEE7ING August 3, 1982 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Kondrick called the August 3, 1982, Parks & Recreation Co�nission meeting to order at 7:37 p.m. RQLL CALL: Members Present: Dave Kondrick, Mary Schreiner, Jan Seeger, Dick Young, Dan Allen Menbers Absent: None Others Present: Charles Boudreau, Parks & Recreation Director APPROVAL OF JULY 6, 1982, PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTZON BY MR. YOUNG� SECONDED BY MS. SCXREINER� TO APPROVE TXE JULY 6� 1982� PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITT&N. UPON R VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYfi� CHAIRPERSON KOtJDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRZED UNRNIMOUSLY. APPROVAL OF A6ENDA: The following items were added to the agenda: Springbrook Nature Center Foundation - Item a under "Director's Report" CorrMnunity Park Update - Item b under "Director's Report" Letter fran John and Darlene Zurawski - Item a under "Other Business" MOTION BY MS. SCHREINER� SECONDED BY MS. SEEGER� TO APPROVE THE RGENDA RS AMENDED. UPON A VOZCE VOTS� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAZRPERSON KONDRICK DECLW2ED THE MOTION CARRZED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. DIRECTOR'S REPORT: : a. Springbrook Nature Center Foundation Dr. Boudreau stated the Springbrook Nature Center Foundation recently put on a fine breakfast meeting to honor Pine Cone Nursery for the donation of 400 shrubs to help beautify the park. The foundation also gave Pine Cone Nursery an attractive plaque, He stated he thought the people from the nursery really appreciated the little extra recognition i PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 3 1982 PAGE 2 shown them for their donation. and made favorable �omnents, not only about Springbrook Nature Center, but about the Fridtey park systen iR general. Ms. Seeger stated that after the donation, Pine Cone Nursery sent staff out to help plant the shrubs at different levels and later sent out instructions on how to insure the growth and health of the shrubs. She stated it was definitely an exceptiona] gift. Mr. Kondrick stated he thought it would be a nice gesture for the Commission to also send Pine Cone Nursery a thank-you letter. b. Cortmunity Park Update Dr. Boudreau stated the irrigation is now in and they are backfilling. They should be putting the seed in next Monday, and they are working on the lighting. Dr. Boudreau stated a local architect, Don Pertinen, has consented to do the work on a building that might go into the center of the community park. Mr. Pertinen has designed a rough model of what he has envisioned that building ta look like. The building would be two levels, with the lower level being restrooms, concessionaire, storage, and t�e upper level being open for storage, scorekeepers and announcers, and a small meeting room. He stated this model was just an idea and would be changed and refined. Dr. Boudreau stated he would keep the Correnission informed of things as they happen. 2. NEW BUSINESS: a. Springbrook Fee Policy Dr. Boudreau stated that at the last meeting, Staff was directed to respond to Councilman Bob Barnette concerning his questions about the operation and maintenance costs and policies for Springbrook Nature Center. He stated his memo dated July 12, 1982, to Mr. Qureshi for distribution to the City Council members re: "Fee Policy at Springbrook Nature Center" was in answer to some of Mr. Barnette's questions. Dr. Boudreau stated that, as far as a fee policy, he felt the Parks & Recreation Comnission should make sane recommendation to City Council on whether or not tfiey want a fee policy esiablished for the use of ihe = Springbrook Nature Center. Dr. Boudreau stated that right now they have a request fran a school in northern Anoka County that is requesting an on-site canmitment fran Siah St. Clair for two hours each week for ten weeks. Do they or do they not charge this school for this type of staff commitment? Or, do th� even do that kind of service2 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 3, 1982 PAGE 3 Ms. Schreiner stated she felt very strongly that the City of Fridley cannot support these groups outside the City. However, she realized it was very difficult with the school district boundary lines unless they pro-rate the boundary lines according to the num6er of Fridley children registered. Ms. Seeger stated that originally the schaols had indicated they would help with the nature center, and then they backed off. Actually, the nature center received regional funding, but tfiose regional funds were not for staff. Staffing was the area in which the school districts were told that help was needed. Mr. Kondrick stated that as far as being a regianal park, anyone can drive to the park and see it at no charge, but he thought it was only right that those who request a scheduled program be cfiarged a program fee of some kind. Dr. Boudreau stated the fee policy they suggest the City Council establish has ta be far more reaching t6an just the sc600l population,as there are other groups the City is serving also. He stated there were four possi- bilities: 1. Continue as they have with no fee or charge on a first-come, first-serve basis. 2. Establish a flat fee per hour. 3. Adopt a per person charge. 4. Establish a flat fee for service to all four schoot districts in Fridley at "x" amount of dol7ars per year, pro-rating out each school district. Ms. Schreiner stated that, because the schools are in a bind now finan- cially, she thought �2 or q3 was more feasible, and #4 could be considered for the future. Mr. Allen and Ms. Schreiner felt there should be a different rate for other groups, private or comnercial, or another city. The Commission members concurred with the first paragraph, second page, of Dr. Boudreau's memo to Mr. Qureshi regarding the resident/non-resident status (with some modifications): "For the purposes of resident/non- resident status, we would recommend that groups fran schools within the City limits of Fridley (Districts ll, 13 14, and 16) or schools with Fridley students attending tfiat educationa center � g�r�a��d�e�_s� �K�-12) and groups associated with these schools, would all 6e consi�ident groups. All other school groups would be considered non-residents." Dr. Boudreau stated if they decide to go with fees, there should be a resident fee of $1 per person for one session (approx. 1-12 hr, in length). The resident would have first priority on the use of the nature center facility. The non-resident or profit-making organization should be charged $2 per person and have secondary priority on use of the facility. � PARKS & RECREATION COMMiSSION MEETING, AtlGUST 3; 1982 PAGE 4 Mr. Yaung and Ms. Schreiner stated they thought $2 per person was too high and felt $1.5U per person was more reasonable. Dr. Boudreau asked if civic groups within Fridley were to be considered as resident groups and charged the resident fee. Ms. Seeger stated she was not willing to set a charge for civic groups as civic groups contribute so much to the City in donations and other contributions. Ms. Schreiner stated when staff time is involved in programninq, she felt people should not be offended when they are required to help pay for that staff time. Mr. Kondrick agreed with Ms. Schreiner. MOTION BY MS. SCXRSINER� SECONDED BY MR. YOUNG� TXAT FOR THE PURPOSES OF RESIDfiNT/NON-RESIDENT STATUS� THE PARKS & RECREATSON COMMISSION RECOMMENDS TO CITY CDUNCIL THAT GROUPS FROM SCHODLS WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF FRZDLEY (SCHOOL DISTRICTS 12� I3� 14, AND I6) OR SCHOOLS WITH FRIDLEY STUDSNTS ATTENDING THAT SDUCATSONAL CENTER (GRADES K=I2) AND GROUPS ASSOCSATED WZTN THESE SCHODLS� WOU7.� ALL BE CONSID�'it�'D RESIDENT GROUPS. ALL OTHER SC800L GROUPS WOIILII BE CONSID,�RED NON- RESIDENTS. TNEY RECOMMEND THAT RESIDENT GROUPS BE CHARGED $I PER PERSON AND BE GIVEN TOP PRIORITY ON THE USE OF THE SPRINGBRDOK NATURE CENTER FACILITY� AND NON-RESIDENT GROUPS BE CHARGED $2.50 PER PERSON AND GSVEN SBCOND PRIORSTY ON THE USE OF THE SPRINGBROOK NATURE CENTER FACILITY. UPON R VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTING RY&� CXRIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTSON CARRIED UNANZMOUSLY. 3. OLD BUSINESS: a. Northeast Chamber & City Band funding Dr. Boudreau stated that at the last meeting, the Commission had requested further information on this subject. They had requested a list of the members of both groups, the amount of funding being requested, and what organizational groups the City Council had decided not to fund. He stated the Comnission members had a list of the members of the North- east Chamber Ensemble and the City Band. The N�rtheast Chamber was requesting $7,700 from the City of fridley, and the City Band was request- ing $2,000 from the City of Fridley. ' Dr. Boudreau stated the five organizations the City Council had decided not to fund were the Central Center for Family Resources, North Suburban Family Services Center, Southern Anoka Community Assistance, The Alexan- dra House, and the Fridley Creative Play Center. PARKS & RECREATION COFAtISSION MEETIN6 AUGU57 3 1982 PAGE 5 Mr. Young stated that at the Planning Comnission meeting of July 14, that commission went on record reco�nending to City Council that funding only be provided to S.A.C.A., the Alexandra House, and Central Center for Family Resources. Mr. Kondrick stated that recommendation came about because of �he exten- sive research done by the Human Resources Commission. He stated he felt Mr. Young had presented a good moral issue regarding the fact that if five needy organizations have been denied funding, the City Counci7 should also consider the denial of funding to the Fridley City Band and the Northeast Chamber Ensemble. Ms. Schreiner stated she had a hard time understanding why children have to pay for city programning; yet the people interested in playing in a band or orchestra are not charged to participate in something they want to do. It just isn't consistent. Just because the City Band and the Northeast Chamber Ensemble have always been funded doesn't mean it ha� to continue. Dr. Boudreau stated that for the $2,000 the City funds the City Band, the band cor�nits to putting on six band concerns for the Parks & Recreation Department during the summer. Ms. Schreiner stated it was her feeling the band members and orchestra members should be asked to he]p subsidize their directors' salaries to a certain extent, especially if the City Council has decided not to fund any needy organizations. If the City Council does go along with the funding of the City Band and the Northeast Chamber Ensemble, then she felt the City's priorities were really mixed up. Dr. Boudreau stated it was Staff's question of why should Fridley have the full brunt of the cost of these two groups when the memberships are so widespread. Ms. Seeger stated she liked the idea of having a city band. She stated the City 8and contributes much to the City of Frid]ey. She felt there was a void and a shortage of cultural kinds of t�ings in the community, and she would hate to discourage this type of group. Ms. Schreiner stated that before the Corrmission makes any recommendations, sre would like to request one additional piece of information, and that was to find out what the total expenses are for the year for each of these groups and how much the members actually contribute to their group. � MOTION 8Y MS. SCHREINER� SECONDED BY .�II2, YOUNG� TO REQUEST STAFF TO OBTASN INFORMATION ON THE TOTAL COSTS OF WHAT TXE MEMBERS OF THE CITY BAND AND THE NORTXEAST CXAMBSR ENSEMBLE CONTRIBUTE TO THE GROUPS, DISCUSSZON TO BE CONTINUED AT THE NEXT MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VDTING AYB� CHRIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PARKS & RECREATION COMMi5SI0N MEETING, AUGUST 3 1982 PAGE 6 Dr. Boudreau stated he would invite Ross Larson, President of the fridley City Band, and Betty 3cott, Manager of the Northeast Chamber Ens�nble, to the next Commission meeting to dTSCUSS and answer the Carrnission's questions. b. Meeting Dates & Times After sane discussion, the Parks & Recreation Comnission members decided to change their meeting date from the first Tuesday of each month to the Monday directly preceding the second Planning Commission meeting. Dr. Boudreau stated he would compile a list of the meeting dates for the remainder of the year and mail these to the Canmission members. Next Comnission meeting - Sept. 27, 7982. c. Policy Manua7 MOTION BY MR. YOUNG, SECONDED 8Y �II2. AlLEN, TO CONTINUB DISCUSSION ON TXE POLICY MANUAL AT THE NEXT MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOSE� AL.L VOTSNG AYE� CXAIRPERSON ICONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMWSLY. Dr. Boudreau stated Jack Kirk has been assigned to work with the Commission members on the policy manual. 4. OTHER BUSINESS: a. Letter from John & Darlene Zurawski, 6767 - 7th St. N.E. Dr, Boudreau stated John & Darlene Zurawski's home is on the north side of Terrace Park. Their home was apparently torn down in the tornado, and when it was rebuilt, no one bothered to shoot the property line so the house is very close to the park property line. He stated Mr. & Mrs. Zurawski want to extend their present structure to include a family room. When the family room is added on, the overhang will take up about 2-3 feet and wi71 be hanging out onto park property. Mr. & Mrs. Zurawski would like to purchase 3 ft. of park property, as ttey feel their addition wi71 improve the value of their 1and:and wou7d not interfere with park activ9ties. Dr. Boudreau stated he has gone out with Curt Dahlberg and looked at ' the property. They feel that 2-3 feet x 155 feet back will not affect the intended use of the park iayout. MOTION�BY 1�LS. S&EGER� SfiCONDSD BY MR. YOUNG� TO RECEIVE THE LETTER DAT&D AUG. 3� 1982� FROM JOHN & DARLfiNE ZURAWSKI. _ __ .. _. . _. ...... __ . ...... ...... .._.. . ... .. ._ PARKS & RECREATiON COMNIISSION MEETLNG, AUGUST 3, 1482 ' PAGE 7 i7PON A VOICS VOTE, RLL VOTING AY&� CXAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION BY MR, YOUNG� SECONDSD SY 1�2. ALLEN� TO RECOMMEND TO CZTY COUNCIL THRT THE CITY SELL TO JOHN & DARLENE ZURRW5KI A STRIP OF iAND NOT MORE THAN 3 FT. WIDE AND I55 FT. IANG AA70INING THE PROPERTY OF TERRACE PARK FOR TXE PURPQSE OF AN ADDITIDN TO THEIR HOME RT 6767 - 7TH STREET N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE.� ALL VOTING AYE� CHR78PERSON RONDRICX DECLARED TXE MOTION CRRRIED UNRNSM�JSLY. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MS. SCXREINER, SECONDED BY F42. YOUNG� TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE AUGUST 3� 1982� PARKS & ItECREATION COMMISSION MEETING AA70URNED AT 9:45 P.M. Respectfully submitted, G ✓�c2. ynn Sa a Recording Secretary � CITY OF FRIDLEY HUMAN RESORUCES COMMISSION - MEETING AUGUST 5, 1982 CAIL TO ORDER: Cfiairperson van Dan cal7ed the August 5, 1982, Human Resources Carmission meeting to order at 7:31 p.m. ROLL CAIL: Members Present: Mary van Dan, Peter Treuenfels, Lynn Boergerhoff Members Absent: Jayne Noble, Brian Goodspeed Oth�rs Present: Mary Cayan, Human Resources Assistant APPROVAL OF JULY 1, 1982, HUMAN RESOURCES CONMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY l�IIt. TREU&NFEIS, SECONDED BY ]NR. BOERGERXOFF, TO APPROVE TXfi JULY 2, 3982, AU14AN RfiSOURCES COMMISSION MINUT&S AS WRITT6N. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON VAN DAN DBCLARED THE HOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. NO FAULT GRIEYANCE PROCEDURE - DISCUSSION: Mr. Treuenfels stated that since two of the five Comnission members were not present, it would be better to wait to make the decision on the No-Fault Grievance Procedure when all the Canmission members were present; however, he would like to know if the other two Commission members were in favor or opposed to the No-Fault Grievance Procedure. Mr. Boergerhoff stated he had reviewed the No-Fault Grievance Procedure materials. He stated he had not been able to attend the training session, so he did not feel he was in the position at this time to participate in a grievance committee, shou7d one be formed, but the Comnission had his support in any way he could be of assistance. Ms. van Dan stated there was no reason why they couldn't have additional training sessions in the future, not only for other carmission members, but possibly for other interested citiaens. She vauld like to see a little more involvement fran other people in the cortmanity. Ms. van Dan stated she thought maybe the Commission should present this to the City Council at one of their conference meetings to see if the City Council was even interested in the No-Fault Grievance Procedure. MUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION �EETIN6, AUGUST 5; 1982 PAGE 2 Mr. Treuenfels stated one important question that will be asked is: How much staff time will be involved? He stated he fett the committee could probab7y do most of the xork. The cortunittee cauld certain]y take care of the quarterly report that has to be filed with the State. Ms. van Dan stated that if they had a large enough group of enthusiastic volun- teers from the community, the typing and everything could be handled by the comnittee, except for the staff ]iaison. Mr. Treuenfels stated a staff person wou7d not have to be present at any of the meetings between the grievant and the respondent. He t�ought staff involvement would be very minimal. Staff couTd help with pubticity. He stated expenses would be another factor, but he thought the co�nittee could do most of the work. As far as a meeting p7ace, they may have to utilize City Ha11 or use the library. He stated they have looked at the lega] aspects, and that was one thing they would have to be careful about. They would need a release form that the grievant and respondent would sign. The City Attorney would have to review the form that is already provided by the State Department of Human Rights. Ms. van Dan stated she was very interested in the No-Fault Grievance Procedure and she knew both Mr. Goodspeed and Ms. Noble had expressed interest, Mr. Treuenfels recommended that the other tva Canmission members be nOtified that a decision would be made on the No-Fau7t Grievance Procedure at the next meeting. If any of the Conmissioners cannot attend that meeting, they shou]d let their feelings be known so the Commission can make a motion at the next meeting. MOTION BY MR. TRE(IfiNFELS� SECONDED 8Y MR. BOERGERXOFF� TO CONTINUE DISCUSSZON ON THS NO-FAULT GRIEVANCE PROCEDURS AT THB NEXT MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTSNG AYE� CXRIRPERSON VAN DAN DSCLARED THE AfOT20N CARRIED UNRNIMOUSLY. Ms. Cayan stated she would try to get this item on the City Counci] conference meeting agenda in September. Mr. Treuenfels stated that at the last meeting, the Commission passed a motion recommending the City of Fridley officiaily join the League of Human Rights Commissions. Ms. Cayan stated she has talked to the people from the League and they are in the process of refiguring the dues for fridtey. The amount should be between $105-110. She stated she is waiting for the paperwork along with the application. She has talked to Mr. Boardman, and that fee can be taken out of the Commission's budget, 2. HANDICAP SURVEY UPDATE - LYNN BOERGERNOFF: Mr. Boergerhoff stated the Cortmission members had a draft of the final report of the information received from the handicap survey. He stated these are the results the best they understand them from the survey that was done of the city residents. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETIN6, AUGUST 5, 1982 PAGE 3 Mr. Treuenfels asked Mr. Boergerhoff if he would recarenend any actions to be taken by the Human Resources Comnission, the Planning Commission; or the City Council. Mr. Boergerhoff stated the Accessibility Survey Cortanittee can be supported by the information in this report in terms of the barriers people reported encountering, and some inferences about barriers within their own homes and what steps could be taken. Some support by the International Year of Disabled Persons Committee and the Human Resources Commission might be directed toward househotds that could receive incane assistance through retrofit since several househo]ds did indicate both a need for retrofitting and financial assistance. He stated Ms. Cayan has directed some attention to that aiready. Ms. Cayan stated the City of fridley has just received $206,000 of comnunity development block grant monies, and $40,000 of that is being directed toward retrofit grants. She stated she is just getting the publicity out on it now. She stated the CAP Agency wi]1 be administering the program for the City, and they have put a cap of $9,000 per grant which sAould be enough to do atl the basic types of retrofitting and also some rehab work. The CAP Agency indicated that E9,000 should take care of a71 the costs, other than installing an elevator, so they shoutd be ab3e to retrofit approximate7y five homes. Mr. Boergerhoff stated all the information in the report canes fran 121 persons identified as disabled in the whote city. He stated he will rewrite this report and have the final form ready for the Comnission to review at their next meeting. Ms. van Dan stated the IYDP Canmittee has put together a fantastic piece of information, and she is looking forward to reviewing the report. She stated she felt it would be appropriate for the IYDP Committee and Human Resources Comnission to send a letter of appreciation to Dr. Lui of the State Division of Vocational Rehab and George Cree1 of Health Central. MOTION BY .�ffi. TREfISNFfiIS, SBCONDfiD BY 1�t. BOERGERHOFF, TO SSND A L&TTBR DF APPRECIRTION AND �CBNITION Z'p DR. L[l7 AND 1�. CRESL:- UPON A VOICfi VOTE� ALL VOTING AYS� CHAZRPERS0�7 VAN AAN DfiCLARSD TXE MOTSON CARRIfiD UNANIMOUSLY. 3. ACCESSIBILITY SURVEY COMNIITTEE - UPDATE: Ms. Cayan stated things are really going well, The fundraising efforts are continuing. and Mr. Minton has been doing the bulk of the fundraising work. Ms. Cayan stated a1T the buitdings in Fridley have been surveyed and that information has been gathered. Return ]etters to building owners have been written and 5-6 are being mailed out each day. Ms. Cayan stated the guidebook format has been pretty well set. Mr. Minton has written an introduction, and she would expect the introduction draft t� be approved at their next meeting on August 12. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 5, 1982 PAGE 4 Ms. Cayan stated they have been given sane volunteer time from a professional corrmercial artist, who wil] be doing the cover design. Depending upon what the cover tooks like, they may use it for the cover on the report Mr. Boergerhoff is putting together and also for the 504 study being put together by Ju1ee Quarve-Peterson, so there is a comnon theme on all their handicapped- oriented publications. Ms. Cayan stated the target date for the actual completion of the writing of the guidebook is the end of August. Depending upon the availability of monies, it should be available by the end of Sept./early Oct. 4. O7HER BUSINESS: a. Metro Mobility Ms. Cayan stated she has just received a letter from Metro Mobility announcing they will be expanding in Fridley. She stated there is an open house on Tuesday, Aug. 17, from 4:00-6:00 p.m, to explain the expansion. She stated she is planning to attend this meeting. Mr. Boergerhoff stated he would tentatively plan to attend this meeting. b. Letter from Dr. Baumer, Family Life Center MOTION BY 1�II2. BOERGERHOFF, SECONDED 8Y MR. TREUENFELS� TO RECENE A LETT'SR DAT&D JULY 9� 198i� FRQhf DR. BAUMER OF THE FAMI.LY LIPE� CENTER FOUNDATION. UPON A VOICE VOTE, AI,L VOTING AYE� CHAIRPSRSON VAN DAN DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. c. September Meeting Date Ms. van Dan stated there would be no meeting in September, and the next meeting would be Oct. 7. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. BOERGERf10FF� S$CONDED BY MR, TREUENFEIS� TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON�A VOICE VOTfi, ALL VOTZNG AYE� CHAIRPERSON VRN DAN DECLARED THfi AUGUST 5� 1982� XUMRN RESOURC&S COMMISSION MEETING AA70URNED AT 8:30 P.M. Respectfully subm'tted, . y Sa a Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 18, 1982 CALL TO ORDER: Chairwoman Schnabel called the August 18, 1982, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:35 p,m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Ms. Schnabel, Mr. Oquist, Ms. Gabel, Mr,Svanda, Mr. Kondrick, Mr. Saba Members Absent: Ms, van Dan Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner Gerald Paschke, 7260 University Ave. N.E. APPROVAL Of AUGUST 4, 1982, PLANNING COMMISSION MINOTES: MOTION BY MR. OQUIST� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� SO RPPROVE THE AUGUST 4� I982� PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES. The following changes were made to the minutes: Page 2, paragraph 8, second line: Change "propoer" to " p�ro o�ser". Page 3, paragraph 2 under Item 2, second 1ine: Change "mo� to "body" UPON A VOICE VOTE'� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MINUTES APPROVED AS AMENDED. 1. PUBLTC HEARING: REZONING RE UEST, ZOA #82-04, BY G. W. PASCHKE: Rezone from �-1 light in ustria areas to C-2 general 6usiness areas}, Lots 4 and 5, Block 3, University Industrial Park, to be part of a new shopping area on University Avenue, the same being 7941 and 7981 Rancfiers Road N.E. MOTION BY MR. SABA� SEC Q'DED BY MR. SVANDA� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ZOA #82-04 BY G. W. PASCHKE. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNASEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:38 P.M. Mr. Boardman stated Lots 4 and 5 are the lots in question, Lots 6, 7, and 8 are presently zoned C-2. The proposal being submitted is actually for two commercial buildings; therefore, Mr, Paschke is requestinq that Lots 4 and 5 be rezoned to C-2 to make one contiguous parcel for the deve7opment of the buildings. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 18 1982 PAGE 2 Mr. Boardman stated there are several things to consider, which are not necessarily a consideration of the rezoning; however, when they consider development on Lots 4 and 7, across Rancher's Road in Block 4, there is a 100 ft. setback requirement on industrial whQn it is across from a commercial district. In this situation where there is only a 152 ft.-deep lot, there will probably be variance requests for setbacks. He stated variances were granted with the plat on Lot 7 and another lot up in the corner. When the plat was approved, the variance on the setback was reduced to 35 ft. because it was zoned comnercial. Mr. Boardman stated the drainage is pretty well being handled. The drainage right now is al] flowing to the back lots where there is a holding pond that was established for the entire development. MOTION 8Y 1�2. SABA� SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST� TO CL0.SE TXE PUBLIC XEARING ON ZOA N82-04 BY G. W. PASCHKE. UPON R VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHRIRWANAN DECIARED TXE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:54 P.M. Mr. Oquist stated this request to have all the lots on the south end zoned commer- cial seemed reasonab]e. When it was platted, they did allow the variance to the property across the.street to allow for a 35 ft, setback. Ms. Schnabel stated she also thought the initial planning was appropriate for this area. MOTION 8Y 1�. OQUIST, SECONDED 8Y Dff2. KONDRICK, TO RECOAIMEND TD CITY COUNCIL RPPROVAL OF REZONING REQUEST k82-04 BY G. W. PASCXXE TO REZONE FROM M-1 (LIGXT INDUS2RIAL RRERS) TO C-2 (GENERRL BUSINESS AREAS), SATS 4 AND 5, BZ,OCK 3� UNIVERSITY INDUSTRIAL PARK� PO BE PART OF A NEW SHOPPING AREA ON UNIVERSITY RVENUE, THE SAME BEING 7941 AND 7981 RANCHERS ROAD N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CXRIRWOMAN SCNNABEL DECLARED TXE MOTION CAP.RIED UNRNIMOUSLY. Mr. Boardman stated this request would go to City Counci] on Sept, 13. 2. RECEIUE AUGUST 3, 1982, PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY AfR. XONDRZCK� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO RECEIVE THE AUGUST 3� I982� PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES, UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAZRWOMAN SCHNABSL DECLARED THE MOTION C.ARRIED UNANIMDUSLY. Mr. Kondrick stated the Parks & Recreation Commissiofi made a motion on page 4 to the City Council regarding fee schedules, recommending that "groups from schools within the city limits of Fridley (School Dist. 11, 13, T4, and 76) or schools with Fridley students attending that educational center (Grades K-72) and groups associated with these scfiools would all be considered resident groups. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 18, 1982 PAGE 3 All other school groups would be considered non-residenis. Resident groups to be charged $1.00 per person and given top priority on the use of Springbrook Nature Center and non-resident groups to be cAarged $1.50 per person and given second priority.° Ms. Gabel stated she had a real problem with one governmental agency paying another governmental agency, 'She realized the City and the schools are in a financial bind, but she did not see how one governmenta7 agency charging another governmental agency solved anything. She recognized the problem, but she did not like this solution to that problem, Mr. Oquist stated he understood what Ms. Gabel was saying, but he did not have a problem with it. He stated they see that in industry all the time, where one division funds another division to do work,even though the money is all cominq out of the same corporate hat. Ms. Gabe7 stated the difference is that private industry is not coming out of the taxpayer's pocket. Mr. Svanda asked if there was a break for people or children who could not afford to pay the user's fee. Mr. Kondrick stated no one would be denied because of inability to pay. Ms. Gabel stated sometimes children are left at the school when the rest of the children go an a field trip because they do not pay. If the City starts charging these fees, they are setting it up for these kinds of situations. Ms. Schnabel asked if this fee was just a method of collecting revenue for programming and it was not necessary to collect the fee because of the amount of time Mr, St. Clair is spending that keeps him away from oiher parts of his job or because he cannot handle the present vo7ume? Mr. Kondrick stated that was correct, Mr. Kondrick stated it is just 7ike anything else. Wheneaer you play or partici- pate in any type of organized programming, you have to pay for it. He did not know why this type of programning should be excluded. Ms. Schnabel stated the a school field trip may have to go. problem is that those programs are voluntary; whereas, be a scheduled thing in the school and the child would Ms. Gabel stated that if there is such a demand for this type of programming, why not charge people outside the Fridley school districts and not the school districts within Fridley as the taxpayers are already paying for it2 Mr. Oquist stated he still did not see what was wrong with one function like that helping to pay for itself. From a business standpoint, it was a good idea. He stated the dollars collected can be used for all kinds of things in the park, and it is not money that is going to be flushed down the drain. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. AUGUST 18, 1982 PAGE 4 Mr. Boardman stated they have to understand that there wi17 be some cuts. There are some very serious financial difficulties because of state cutbacks. Fee schedules are going to have to be raised for anything that is a specia] activity. Ms. 5chnabel stated that, at this point, she was not convineed there was a problem financially. Mr. St. Clair's salary is being paid, it has been budgeted fm, and he is doing his job, and she did not see the need for an extra fee at this time. Maybe a need wil] be demonstrated in the future, but she did not see that need yet. Mr. Saba stated he had no problem with the fee concept, but his problem was with any children who might be excluded from a field trip because of inability to pay the $1. Ne stated maybe there should be some kind of communication from the Parks & Recreation Department to the school system stating that no child would be denied programming if they could not afford the $1, Then, no c6ild would be required to stay at school in another class because he/she could not afford to go on the field trip to the nature center. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR, OQUI5T, TO CONCUR WITH THE MOTION 1+IADE BY THE PARXS & RECREATION COMMISSSON ON AUGU5T 3, I982, AND TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL THAT RESIDENS GROUPS BE CHARGED $I/PERSON AND SE GIVEN TOP PRIORITY OF THE USE OF THE SPRINGBROOK NATURE CENTER� AND THAT NON-RE52DENT GRDIIPS BE CHARGED $I.50/PERSON RND B& GIVEN SECOND PRIORITY OF THE IISE OF TXE��NATURE CENTER, Mr. Saba stated he would like to see a statement in the motion indicating that there be some communication between the City and the schools that no child would be-excluded because of inability to pay. MOTION BY MR. KONDXICK� SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST, TO AMEND THE RBOVE MOTION TO INCLUDE A STATEMENS THAT TXE PLANNING COMMISSZON WOULD AISO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COMMUNICATE TO THE SCHOOL SYSTEM THAT NO CHILD IS TO BE EXCLUDED PROGRAMMING BECAUSE OF�INABILITY TO PAY. � � UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Kondrick stated there was some discussion on the part of the Parks & Recreation Commission regarding the City's fundin9 the Northeast Chamher Ensemble and the City Band. He stated the Commission will be meeting with the president of the City Band �nd the manager of the Northeast Chamber Ensemble at their next meeting in order to get some answers to some of the Corronissioners' questions. Mr. Saba suggested they discuss the possibility of the band and chamber ensemble members raising money through industry, rather than seeking city fundinq. PLANNTNG COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 18, 1982 PAGE 5 Mr. Kondrick stated the Parks & Recreation Commission made a motion on page 7 recommending the City Council sell 3 feet of Terrace Park land to John & Darlene Zurawski in order for them to build an addition on their home, Ne stated this would not affect the intended use of the park, and he would recommend the Planning Commission concur with that motion. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK��SECONPED BY MR. SABA� TO CONCUR WITH THE MOTION MADE BY THE PRRKS & RECREATSON COMMISSION AND TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL-THAT THE CITY 5ELL TO JOHN & DAf2LENE ZURAWSKI A STRIP OF LAND NOT MORE THAN 3 FS. WIDE AND 155 FT. IANG ADJOZNING THE PROPERTY OF TERRACE PARK FOR THE PURPOSE OF AN ADDI- TION TD THEIR HOME AT 6767 - 7TH ST. N,E. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3, RECEIVE AUGUST 5, 1982, NUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MR, KONDRICK, TD RECEIVE THE AUGUST 5� 1982, AUMAN RESOURCE5 COMMISSSON MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHRIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED SHE MDTION GARRIED UNRNZMOUSLY. � ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK,�SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE AUGUST 18� 1982� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:50 P.M. Respectfully subm'tted, y aba Recording Secretary �% ��1� � � � �� .�� .,,,- ,� �y� � �� s�� /�6d ;� . �= � - ' - ��/! U � U�= N �