The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 09/15/1982 - 30582� i �, CITY OF FRIDLEY . PLANNING CONLMISSION MEETING. SEPTEMBER 15, 1982 CALL TO ORDER• Chairwoman Schnabel called the September 15, 1982, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:34 p.m. -.ROLL CALL: Members Present: Ms. Schnabel, Mr. Oquist, Ms. Gabel, Mr. Kondrick. Ms. van Dan, Mr. Saba Mer�bers Absent: Mr. Svanda Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner Kent Hill. Administrative Assistant Bob Barnette, City Council Ed Har�ernik, City Council Ruth Ounn� Fridley Sun Charles Hooley, President� Cub Foods Don Pollard� Director of Real Estate, Cub Foods Shelley Johnson, Barton-Aschman ^ Robert Schroer, 7620 University Ave. N.E. John Crouch, representing Kunz Oil Company See attached lists APPROVAL OF AUGUST 18, 1982, PLAN�JING COPIMISSION MINUTES: PIOTION BY !!S. VAN DAN� SECONDED BY 1NR. XONDRICK� TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 18, 2982, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VDICE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE� CXAZRWOMAN SCANABEL DECLARED TXE N90TION �tRIED UNANZ1�lOUSLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: REZQP�ING REQUEST, ZOA #82-05, BY CUB FOOOS: Rezone from eavy in ustria areas, to C-2S genera s opping areas), Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 18, to allovr the construction of a new retail shopping area, the same being 450 - 73rd Avenue N.E. JNOTION BY l�t. OpUIST� SECONDED BY 1�1R. SABA� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC XEARING ON REZONING REQUEST� 20A H82-O5� BY CUB FOODS. UPON A VDICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED TXE PUBLIC 11EARING OPEN AT 7 t 35 P.1�l. Mr. Boardman stated this proposal is to rezone this parcel from heavy industrial (M-2) to general shopping (C-2S). The general shopping zone allows the type of n uses that generate large traffic and traffic parking areas. The proposal submitted %\ PLANNING CON�IISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 15 1982 PAGE 2 ini��ally was for the rezoning of the entire M-2 area, approximately 27 acres. �here has been some modification to that, and Cub Foods has reduced the request ��a rezone only the property facing the University Ave. service drive. The property in back will remai� industrial (M-2). He stated he would now turn the meeting over to representatives from Cub Foods who wauld give their presentation. -. Mr. Charles Hooley stated he was the President of Cub Foods. He introduced •-Mr. Don Pollard. Director of Real Estate for Cub Foods. and stated Mr. Pollard would present their proposed plan. Mr. Pollard stated this is a 21-acre site. After rezoning approximately 17.2 acres, Cub Foods would take up approximate]y half of that land. They would also have a 40,000 sq. ft. drugstore, 10.000 sq. ft. of small shops, and a restaurant. He stated they have landscaped the area. They have a parking ratio for the entire site of 7.26 cars per 1,000 sq. ft. They have honored the City s setback off 73rd Ave. of 100 ft. which runs the entire distance of 73rd. Ms. Schnabel asked if Cub Foods had any tenants in mind for the other portions of the shopping area. Mr. Pollard stated they have tenants in mind. but have no contracts with them at this point. ^ Mr. Kondrick asked what the setback was between the service road and the buile .�q. Mr. Pollard stated the setback was about 400 ft. Ms. Schnabel asked what the distance would be from 73rd Ave. to the Cub store itself. Mr. Pollard stated there was over 600 ft. from 73rd to the Cub store. Mr. Pollard stated trailer storage would be between the buildings so they would be screened entirely from 73rd. Mr. Saba asked about the hours of delivery. Mr. Pollard stated the delivery hours are 6 a.m. - 5 p.m.; however, there would be some evening deliveries because the operation would be open 24 hrs. a day. Ms. van Dan asked from what direction would the trucks be entering Cub Foods, and what route would Cub Foods recomnend they enter the operation? Mr. Pollard introduced Mr. Shelley Johnson from Barton-Aschman. who had done the traffic study for Cub Foods. Mr. Johnson stated most of the trucks will probably come from the south from 694. Aftehould a�rroach theestoreieSFrom aatrafficvperspectiveintheutrucksn^ld how they s pp �"'1 � � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 15 1982 PAGE 3 use-either the intersection at 69th b University or the intersection at 73rd b Uriiversity. Both intersections have sufficient capacity to accomnodate the volume of. truck traffic generated by the store. so the truckers could use which- ever intersection was easier for them to negotiate. Ms. Gabel asked how close the first entrance was into Cub Foods from 73rd Ave. �and was it a two-way entrance? Mr. Pollard stated the distance was approximately 220 ft. and it was a two-way entrance. Ms. Schnabel stated that in their agenda material, some comment was made in the traffic study about possibly changing the road configuration by repositioning the restaurant and perhaps going out behind the restaurant. Mr. Johnson stated that in the"Traffic Impact Analysis" done by Barton-Aschman Association for Cub Foods. they did point out that there is a potential way to solve a problem that may arise in the future. The vehicles that enter and exit this site may in the future create enough volume to possibly warrant a traffic signal on 73rd. They do not know enough about the numbers and what is going to happen further to the south to say for sure�that there may be a need for a signal. So. what they have said is that an option should be kept available to the development and the City that says if a signal should ever have to go in there, it can exist 400 ft. from the 73rd b University signal. However. if the roadway was further detached to the east and brought up on the back side of the property. that would put approximately another 300 ft. of space between signals, which was more desirable from a traffic signal standpoint. What they are saying is that this is a little better design if a signal is ever necessary. Mr. Hooley stated he would like to show some slides to more familiarize the Planning Comnission and those in the audience with what the Cub Store would look like if they were located in this area. Mr. Hooley stated they are very proud of the cleanliness they maintain in and around the store. He stated all the garbage and refuse created in the store goes directly into compactors and containers outside. All trucks back up to the dock, and all handling of refuse or product occurs within the store. Maintenance continues 24 hrs, a day, both inside the store and outside the store. Mr. Hooley stated this new store would create 123 more jobs for the people in Fridley. Their tax base per year would be around $4-500.000. Mr. Richard Almstead. 7311 Tempo Terrace, asked what the estimated traffic flow �would be into the area on a 24-hr. basis. 7 days a week. Mr. Johnson stated on an average day, the deve]opment,as they analyzed it. will generate approximately 10,000 vehicles, 5,000 in and 5,000 out, for a"design � day". A"design day" is the day they use and the peak hours of the day to _ determine whether or not the roadways are adequate. But, on a design day which PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 15. 1982 PAGE 4 is.Lhat day that will occur approximately 20-25 days a year� there will be app'roximately 12.000 vehicles. 6,000 in and 6.000 out. He stated they must remember that of these numbers. some of the traffic is a]ready out on the road- ways and is not all new traffic. - Mr. Almstead asked if Cub Foods had any kind of solution for the homeowners on the north side of 73rd on hwo they can compensate for the increased traffic �•��low, the noise at 2 a.m. Sunday morning or Saturday evening, and the access to Locke Park from 73rd. Mr. Hooley stated he had He had checked back into has never been struck by n done some research on the traffic and pedestrian problem. the records for Super Valu for five years, and a pedestrian a semi-trailer. � Mr. Pollard stated the property is presently zoned M-2. Cub Foods could come in and build a warehouse for a]1 the Cub Foods to handle all of their trucks under the present zoning. Also, other manufacturers and distributors could come in, acquire the property, and with the rail spur that exits right now to the back side of the property. they could run ten times as many trucks out of there and could hire employees that work around the clock. He stated one thing with a Cub store is that all their traffic is split up. There are only so many cash registers. so only so many people are leaving the store at one time. ^ Mr. Hooley stated they have 11 Cub stores right now, and they have never had a complaint about either noise or traffic. He stated that in this plan� they have allowed a parking area behind the store for trailer parking so that would not be a problem. Mr. Allan Quam, 399 - 73rd Ave., stated they felt that in Cub's zeal to expand and increase its income, Cub Foods has demonstrated a tota7 lack of sensitivity and regard for their neighborhood. He stated Cub had obviously done splendid market research, a traffic study, and untold planning sessions and hours; yet, no one involved in the community had been approached by Cub to see how the people felt about Cub moving into their neighborhood. It could have saved Cub a lot of time and money. He stated the people were at the meeting to demonstrate to Cub Foods that they do not want Cub on that site; and if Cub persists, the people can only assume that Cub Foods does not care about the neighborhood. Mr. Quam stated that two City Council members suggested two ways for the neighbor- hood to demonstrate their feelings--a good turnout, and a petition. He stated this petition has 394 names,�and a cover letter is attached to the petition. He stated he would like to read some of the points from that letter: 1. This is a residential to our neighborhood. 2. Existing business is directly on 73rd Ave. area. A shopping area would be an eyesore buffered by a greenway and not 7ocated 3. we feel this would most certainly lower the value of our property. n '�' PLANNING CONMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 151 1982 � PAGE 5 � '-"4. 73rd Ave. is a thoroughfare. The traffic level has already reached the saturation point. Any increase in traffic would make access to and from the Melody Manor addition very difficult and dangerous. Melody Manor residents have only two intersections through which to enter or exit 73r� Ave.; both of which are currently haZardous at peak hours. (Mr. Quam stated the people on Rice Creek Blvd. seem to-be very con- cerned, because of the problem they have now in getting in and out. He stated that in using the figure of 6�200 cars per day, assumi�g 80� enter the service road between the hours of 8-10 p.m., that means a car on that road every 10 seconds.) 5. Residences would be subjected to considerable and undesirable debris. noise and disturbances. 6. This property abuts Locke Park and is located near other parks, schools. - and churches. Increased traffic in this area gives us great cause for concern regarding the safety of our children in walking or riding bikes to or from these locations. Mr. Quam stated they are respectfully requesting that the integrity of this neighborhood be preserved with the denial of this request for rezoning. MOTION BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. OpUIST� TO RECEIVE THE PETITION REQUESTING TIiE DENZAL OF RE20NING REQUEST 11ZOA lIB2-OS BY CUB FODDS. UPON A VDICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated this petition would go with the Planning Commission's recommendation and minutes to City Council. Mr. Bill Boatman� 531 Rice Creek Blvd., stated the reason they got a traffic signal at 69th & University was because they signed a petition, and the neighbors agreed to pay for it to he]p protect their children. Now that stop light that was paid for by the neighborhood is going to be used by Cub Foods. Mr. Frank Waks, 7574 - 4th St. N.E. stated that the people in Melody Manor know that most people in this area who are going to travel to Northtown are not going to buck the traffic lights; they are going to travel through Melody Manor to get to Northtown. Mr. Waks asked if Cub Foods had ever considered looking at the piece of property on the cprner of Mississippi St. and University which is owned by the City. Mr. Boardman stated the City has approached Cub Foods about this piece of . . property and Cub Foods has looked at it, but the Super Valu screening board � has advised Cub that this is not a suitable location for a Cub store. s /��\ PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 15, 1982 �� ' PAGE 6 Mr.�Pollard stated the City Staff has shown them all the in the City of Fridley, to his knowledge. Mr. Hooley stated they have toured all the locations in that 8.8 acres was not quite adequate for their store. on 73rd and University was the most desirable location. r�al estate available Fridley, and they felt They felt the location �•.MR. Stan Kowalski� 7450 Tempo Terrace, stated that if Cub Foods moves to this location, School Dist. 16 is losing a tax shelter. Mr. David Thiele, 7300 Tempo Terrace, stated that the majority of the people present at the meeting shop at Cub Foods. He stated they were not against Cub Foods, but are against Cub Foods in this location. Ms. Alice Rassier, 7540 Tempo Terrace, stated she was concerned about Fridley itself with the buildings that are sitting empty right now and all the little restaurants and shopping centers Fridley already has. She was concerned about adding another shopping center� being so close to Northtown, because she thought the neighborhood is looking cr.umby. Ms. Judy Quam, 399 - 73rd Ave.. asked what Cub Foods would do as far as noise abatement. � Mr. Hooley stated they would be doing a lot of landscaping. He stated Cub has 11 stores. They have residences all around those stores; and to his knowledge. they have never had any canplaint about excessive noise or excessive traffic. Mr. Dan Hagen. 7390 Lyric Lane, asked what Cub intended to do with their old store. Was it going to turn into another empty building? Mr. Hooley stated they do not have any plans for the old Cub store at this time. He stated that type of store with the vast open area inside and the parking area is not hard to rent. Mr. Hagen stated they are all concerned about the traffic noise. Mr. Shelley Johnson stated that in talking about the number of vehicles cominq into and out of this development. they must remember that not all the vehicles will be on 73rd, not all of the vehic7es will be on 73rd east of the frontage road, not all the vehicles are going to be on 73rd west of the frontage road, and not all the vehicles are going to be on the frontage road south of this site. The traffic will be divided. According to what they have estimated, approximately 28-29� of the traffic departing this site will utilize 73rd to the east of the frontage road, approximately 35� coming from the north on University will utilize 73rd west of the frontage road, and approximately 36-37� coming from the south on University will probably utilize 69th and use the frontage road past Columbia Arena. Mr. Bob Wienert, 7311 Lyric Lane, stated he was the one who took the petition to the people who live on Rice Creek Blvd. and informed them of tf►is rezoning requ^. He stated there is a portion of Rice Creek Blvd. that is virtually landlocked; tnere is only one road in and out. Proposing approximately 3,000 more vehicles going in and out of that area is ridiculous. � `� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 15, 1982 PAGE 7 Ms.�Karen Dove, 7305 Jackson St.. stated they have a lot of traffic on Jackson S`o-E�t because of Unity Hospital. The quality of life in their neighborhood is such that people do a lot of walking and bike riding. especially in the early evening. �Early evening is also the time when people do a lot of grocery shopping, and they are concerned about someone getting hit by this increased traffic. This kind of development is not the kind of thing they want to encourage. ��.Mr. Ron Mattson, 7324 Symphony St.. stated that if the rezoning request is denied, so�eone could come in and build a large distribution center on this site. Did Cub Foods intend to build a large distribution center on this site? Mr. Hooley stated they could do that. but that was not their intention. Ms. Elizabeth Youngmark. 130 Talmadge Way, stated she was in favor of the new Cub Foods store. She stated Cub Foods was expanding to benefit the people and to make it easier for them to shop. Ms. Schnabel stated it se�ned to be the concensus of the people present that they do like Cub Foods and shop there. They would like to encourage Cub to remain in Fridley. but they do not want the store in this location. Mr. Charles Smith, 7301 Jackson St.. asked if the City knew what the volume of r� traffic was in terms of semi-trailers at the Target Warehouse per day and how that would compare to the Cub Foods operation. He stated that would be interesting to think about in terms of traffic and employees. He stated he thought this proposed Cub Foods develop�ent was a real change-about from the type of thing the Planning Commission and City had in mind when they zoned that area south of 73rd to M-2. The Carter-Day and Target Warehouse operations are probably more in line with what the City was thinking about. - The question was asked from the audience that if this rezoning request was denied, would Cub Foods move out of Fridley? Mr. Hooley stated that if this rezoning request is denied by both the Planning Cormission and City Council� they have two alternative sites that are not in the City of Fridley. JNOTION BY HS. GABEL� SECONDED BY J►!R. KONDRICK� TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC XEARING ON 20A �82—OS BY CUB FOODS. UP�IV A VOICE VOTE� ALL YOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TNE PUBLIC HEARING CLOISED AT 9 s 13 P.11. Mr. Kondrick stated that a lot more traffic will be going by the entrances to Locke Park, so the traffic volume was of concern to him. He also thought there was going to be more traffic on 69th because of the new comnunity park across the street. He did not think the traffic signal at 69th would be able to handle that traffic plus the additional traffic generated by the Cub Foods development. From a parks and recreation point of view, he was not in favor of this development in this location.. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 15, 1982 PAGE 8� Ms.-Gabel stated that the traffic study showed that at peak hours, the traffic co�ditions are at uD" conditton now. and she did not find that acceptable. If tfie conditions are at "D" now. the level will increase with the development. She stated that in addition to the "D" traffic conditions, she also saw this as a spot rezoning which she has always been opposed to in the City. She stated the City has a Comprehensive Plan� and she did not believe this development fit into -,_that plan at all. In the Comprehensive Plan, the City has a commitment to the •:Center City area and they need to see that developed. By a7lowing this develop- ment, they would be jeopardizing their Center City project, and she did not think it was in the City's best interest to do that. Mr. Saba stated he agreed with Ms. Gabel. He was also concerned about the traffic. He stated he thought Cub Foods was a great operation. and he would like to see them locate somewhere in Fridley, but this particular location was just not suitable in terms of the residential area. Ms. van Dan stated she was speaking as a representative of the Human Resources Cor�mission. She had grave concerns, because she did not feel this development was in the best interest of the residents. She did fee] it was important they have high tax return industries in the community. but she also felt they should consider the wishes of the neighborhood. She had great concerns about the traffic pattern, and she was concerned about how this deve]opment would affect the utili- zation of the new community park and the bike trail. � Mr. Oquist stated he was concerned about strip or spot zoning and the traffic. He was not sure the traffic study took into consideration the traffic that will be generated by the new comnunity park. He stated that is going to increase the traffic flow at 69th and 73rd and will create a real problem. Mr. Boardman stated there are some concerns from Staff's voint of view. This is and has always been zoned industrial. They are concerned about creating 73rd as a major focal point compared to University and Mississippi. University and Mississippi has had substantial city financial commitment. The HRA is involved in trying to develop the Center City as a commercial retail focal point for the City. Staff feels there could be some potential problems by shifting that focal point to 73rd. Ms. Schnabel stated she would concur with that. It bothered her that they would be taking the focus of the business community from a comnitment that was already made to Mississippi and University and shifting it north to 73rd and University. She would be afraid of the long range affects on the Center City area which the City has made a commitment to. 1HOTION BY MR. OQUIST� SECONDED BY lyR. XONDRICK� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL DEIVIAL OF REZONING REQUEST� ZOA �182-05� BY CUB FOODS TO REZONE FROM 1N-2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL AREAS) TD C-2S (GENERAL SHOPPING AREAS)� TRACT B� REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 78� TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTIDN OF A NEW RETAIL SAOPPING AREA, TNE SAM^ I�tEING 450 - 73RD AVENUE N.E.� BASED ON TAE REASONS DISCUSSED ABOVE. � 0 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETIN6, SEPTEMBER 15, 1982 PAGE 9 DPOJ11 A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTSNG AYE� CIlASRWOIHAN SCfINABEL DECLARED TBE MOTION GRRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated this item would go to the City Council on October 25. She thanked everyone in the audience for coming to the meeting. "-�_�hairwoman Schnabel declared a ten-minute recess at 9:27 p.m. _ 2. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #82-09_. �b R�E� S : l�er �ect� on . , 3. if� �o`a1Tow an overheaa roof on a woo rame, approximately 30' by 50' on the east end of an existing building� for a display area for fresh produce. located on Lot 1, Block 1. East Ranch Estates. the same being 7620 University Avenue N.E. MOTION BY MR. SABA� SECONDED 8Y MS. CABEL� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC AEARING ON SP �182-09 BY ROBERT SCXROER. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRWOI►!AN SCHNABEL DECLARED TXE PUBLIC BEARING OPEN AT 9:39 P.X. Mr. Boardman stated right now this is classified as a tent area, and Mr. Schroer ,� did get a temporary special use permit for the outside tent for the produce. This was done by the City Council on September 13 to allow Mr. Schroer to go ahead with his produce sale. In the process, Mr. Schroer is submitting an appli- cation for a permanent location for the special use of an outside display area. Mr. Boardman stated a letter was sent to Mr. Schroer on July 14, 1982, identify- ing items that are in non-compliance with City Code. These issues are ones of concern for the special use permit. Mr. Schroer stated the use of this display area would be strictly seasonal-- May 1- Oct. 1. One of the reasons for doing this is because people like the outdoor market, and he may even open it up to some farmers. • r � MOTION BY J�t. XONDRICK, SECONDED BY 1yR. SABA, TO CLOSE THE PUBLZC HEARZNG ON SP �82-09 BY ROBERT SCHROER. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED TXE PUBLIC iIEARING CLOSED AT 10: DO P.J�l. Mr. Oquist stated he did not see anything wrong with this request. Mr. Boardman stated there are a lot of traffic problems and confusion in that area. and they are trying to eliminate that confusion and have a more orderly ^ flow of traffic in that area. There are some things in the property itself that can be done to assist with those traffic problems. Ms. Schnabel suggested that Mr. Schroer and Mr. Boardman sit down and work out these problems. n PLANNING CQMl�1ISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 15, 1982 PAGE 10 MOTSON BY Mt. KONIlRIQt, SSCONDED BY l�t. SABA, TO RECDl��lEND TO CZTY CUUNCIL APPROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMZT REQUEST, SP �82-09� BY ROBERT SCIf�20ER: PER SBCTZON 205.202� 3� O� TO ALLOW AN OVERXEAD ROOF ON A i�00D FRAI�lE� APPROXIMATELY 30� BY 50� ON T8E SAST END OF AN EXISTIXG BUILDZNG FOR A DZSPIAY AREA FOR FRESN PRODUCE, LOCATED ON LOT 1� BLOCK 1� SAST RANCX ESTATES, TAE SANE EEING 7620 UNZVERSZTY AVENUE N.S. =UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECI.ARED-�XE MOTION CARRIED UNANIINDUSLY. 3. LOT SPLIT REf�UEST: L.S. �l82-06, BY THE KUNZ OIL COMPANY: Split off Par– c T B—�Ty'i ng sout�r y of a i ne para e wi t an di stant 197.0 feet north of, as measured at a right angle�to, the South line of said Lot 18). from Parcel A. both in Lot 18, Auditor's Subdivision No. 77. the same being 7355 and 7365 East River Road. Mr. Boardman stated the proposal is to split off Parcel B from Parcel A. One of the stipulations would be a park fee. A park fee is required as part of a lot split. The park fee would be 5635.40. Staff would also recormend two other stipulations: (1) a 45 ft. easement off East River Road for road right-of-way on Parcel A and B to allow for future expansion of East River Road; and (2) a 10 ft. drainage easement on the north side of Parcel A. ^ Mr. John Crouch stated he was representing Kunz Oil Company. He stated it seemeo� to him that it should be the County that insists upon the easement and not the City. The County has the power of eminent domain, and the County has the obligation under the law to pay for private property when they take it. Ne stated their request to divide this parcel of land� 1.86 acres, clearly undeve]oped, clearly not producing the real estate tax revenue it can for the school district, the city. and the county, was a very simple request. Ne frankly thought the City had no right or power to take 45 ft. of this property at this time, but that was for the City's legal staff to advise them. He knew that under the statutes and the case law, the City could take the park dedication fee and the utility easement around the perimeter of the property, and he would not object to those stipulations. But, in talking about the 45 ft., let the County condemn it and then the County can pay for that land. He thought to take 45 ft. of this property was unlawful, and he would not agree with that stipulation. MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY 1NR. SABA� TO REG�OMMEND TD CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST� L.S. #82-06� 9Y TXE KIINZ OIL COMPANY� TO SPLIT OFF PARCEL B (LYING SOUTXERLY OF A LINE PARALLEL WITB AND DISTANT 197.0 FEET NORTH OF, AS 1HEASURED AT A RIGHT ANGLE TD� THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT l e) � FROJ►! PARCEL A, BOTX IN LOT 18� AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISZON NO. 77� TXE SA1�lE BEING 7355 AND 7365 EAST RIVER ROAD� h►ITil THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: 1. TXERE BE A PARK DEDIC�1'IpN FEE OF $635.40 2. A 10 FT. DRAINAGE EASEMENT BE RETAINED ON TXE NORTX SIDE OF PARCEL A UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOalAN SCNNABEL DECLARED TXE 1NOTZON ^ CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. �� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 15, 1982 ""' PAGE 11 4.•.�RECEIVE AUGUST 12, 1982, HOUSING b REDEVELOPMENT.AUTHORITY'MINUTES: J�IOTION BY IyR. SABA� SECDADED 8Y 1�lS. CABEL� TD RECEIVE T8E AUGUST 22� 1982, 80i15ING i REDEVELOPMENT AUTiJORITY MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, GiAIRWQMAN SCXNABEL DECI.ARED THE J�lOTION ' =CARRZED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. RECEIVE AUGUST 27, 1982, HOUSING 6 REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SPEC. MTG. MINUTES: XOTION BY J�2. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MS. VAN LfAN, TO RECENE TXE AUGUST 27� 19B2, SPECIAL ilOUSING & REDEVELOP�►JENT AUTiIORITY 1►lINDTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CBAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. RECEIVE AUGUST 24, 1982, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: JHOTION BY 1►IS. GABEL, SECONDED 8Y MR. KONDRZCK� TO RECEIYE TXE AUCUST 24, 1982� APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAZRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TJ'lE MOTIDN '� CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. NOTION BY MS. VAN DAN, SECONDED BY AIR. KONDRICK� TO RECEIVE A MEMO DATED AUGUST 31� 1982� FROM JOXN FLORA TO GUS DOTY REGARDING THE VARIANCE REQUEST BY GUS DOTY. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADJOURNMENT: J►lOTION BY JyR. SABA� SECONDED BY J�1S. GABEL� TO AA70URN TXE 1NEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED TXE SEPTEMBER I5� 1982� PLANNING COINMISSION 1NEETZNG ADJOURNED AT 11 tI2 P.M. Respectfully submitted, ` �� y Saba Recording Secretary n �, Planning Corrunission Meeting September 15, 1982 Paqe 12 ►/ /�� .1, _ _ •' ' r . - • �iciii —_ � ,��„Y's� �s�Z � �� I� • � � ��'� ��Oti''e- .. �,/��— , p�k� �� . .� . �� ,,� .- ,,,, �— �� . � � ��i /� :� � % /' ii /J1�' . � � /: . . ; i � /� �',� �/ I .�,., � Ie/�Y . � � ,^, , ��- - �s �s� � 5 Ty� �� Q � —� 7 5� � � C' �.,. 5� ��lY Tr: S�, �a,��/ lo. /u.��s ��.z �� yeo �. � C� /6/�'L �r��l� T ��,o�L�� 4� �o �.�.�► a�.., �.:, �:u...,�, , ,r,.,.. ,d�o ,v,�y�� j a,� , �.��..��,� y� i q ��'��-' .�u{.� .�o �.�. /% 7 �/�'t�l�t�cs�-� C'1" -�"�lG %�3 a—��,P,t/I,rf��U��C�� 8� 3 S�. C�,?+�c �. �, %�dS"�'�rsf/�iorr /'��.✓�//� �/ol/�/' /0 3� 93��Ga,ve r• r�•. Cooti /�a��d S ��33 5��,� f��L t��'� Ll�l��s �y 3�.��,, � ti-� � ��/s� �� 1.. �►.�7 /✓- ��P"f L�4dlt�lJ/�, �'►/•vr f,��`lJ �1 bL6 �c��-- � � 7� � �7 �� i�� - � � �s, � ��....�-� y�.., . � �• Planning Comnission Meietinq September 15, 1972 Paqe 13 I �l r.� Q�x. /li� �� SJti 7 � � � � /�l � ,--� y � z �ir�.►..�c. %J • -/�u,e� ' 73 5 0 �v►�+%� o � �.�•�c,� /�1 ti: ' S 54: � . i� � �" tt << � �� /� -�.�J � �� . ��'� 1�� : � y� � � . ��1, ,��►% . � , � � `C�` . �,c,¢1c,�,�� - ,� � , , �� i :� F'. , � � � aEn�� ' � ( �JJ?i� �/'� �.r:�/f' _ � ��.�, �� .�K.- G�� Q� �� {{-- �L � � � A�+/ c�O.�,.�. � � �3� / 73 �/ �3/G , .,// % , �i� ��r� �� S5 yj.2� s.� y3� �S �,� � ?3/0 �?/f .¢fl� �✓�E�,,�� s s�32� 7 �sv % �-t,�.�..� �S i 3 2 �Z5' I`�. ��trdZ S"5 �l 31� , �1v �..� �-�.�r�.�.� s � y.� Z �� 7 �� S��* � 2_ `* . k ' -- S��3Z 755o TE4P� 7EaRA�E �SSI.3�- ( 7� C c�V�eKTc� C itKv� Jl �3 Z �..3 9� �-,z,r�� 32 /`�✓��/ %�� ('��-� �-�� %�:�1 �'�� s 7��/ � s-�--�,3 Z 73Z.o ,�'r''EZ� 3�Y:�'� �, �5-�- 3 Z 3/�o C�� G� ��. � � �'� z . J ysy �;� C:�� v�.a . s�y�L `7 3� ( � ��-.�. � S � � ��r��..,c, .�5`� 3 v �3 �� Jl' � ssy3L 73�� ,� �.�'. �; � 3� 73�8' '� �%� ; � � � 3 ?a � �,, s,�� /�' � � '131 �- S c,�.n�� n,� 51� n. E. �. - Planni i . �jl�.�G�i''L�°� . � � � , � � / , ,i � � � � / i�� !� � . . .'� , � ,,' ,,� — � , ,, . r� .• , ,i. . ..�i �v� ��riPS �i�� e.e s �� , � �. � . �� ,��C�cs, _ %� ��— �� _�� /Q � �15, 1982 � . /� ��j � '� 730 / �.4.�.� - �.�� / i" `'/"'" ��r, O e �3a i �'1y �'J L/ i� s c i�r%.`-it ��Q ' �-- . � �3i ° :�� -� . � �� =� �_yl ,� �/�C 73�� 73�` %3�� 73�0 �� Zr �3vb �j / -' � � �/ / � .. ,� i �"' ` , ,- ,, . . � . � / , �� , , . ,. / f 553 �� %3 ?� rt �$p r .' � � , - , • � �"13 $a � '� . 73 /� s/� �ck� si � � ��J� .. � sa i G� �. i�.� . �"'� � � Planninq Comnission • �� I i , , .,. � i , .�► , - � ' � , , , , �,. . i/�i / j / _� � � �� t� � � , , , "�. 'i � , , , � a e 15 � ys� �� 6�6 �G'�ta�� /�s� � � ��s �� , ,, 1� � � � � /i / � � � �t !/ �( �/ �/ �/ _ . ii // / / % � �� % I� � �� %/� �y� � c ��— �`17�, �.� �ti. i I �r �r %3� � �� 3�o m� . • 7 s/�- 7'��.� �37g �Y,��,�r 73 �� C�•n L G.�r�.G /V � � 3 � y syhP�d �r �� a yS �.�,�� Y ��`� �.��'� �7 �,�.� �7� �",.�,� 73�7 0�.�.�' �13�� :�v�� 3 �� _�_ - . Planning Corronission Meetin September 15, 1982 Pa e 16 , , ,�� , � � , ,, w� , i �, ,� , � ��, �� P �, ��, Z� �� /� � � . �%�1 G �� i Ul' � � � ' � t� • /� �l �� i , •, �, ,. i � , ��. ,, .._ , ., , , ,/. - � �, . 3 �/ � % � 73�� ' T �3f�1 l ��or� _ � 7�y� � 7 � 9 � �',Q.� � e� - 7�a s a� �i�a� � '�, 33 I •�-�. .�- • £- '73 3 � ..� � 5� . �s,� �� '�.£ _ bb�l � � iz�`o•� cQ �� ', G. �T �/�d CG. n ,6/oZ 0 �3�$ �� i vX,�,�o,9vf ��/w� g �Q ti�P, 1 �_ 6'�� .� , ,�� 5 1ti1�.�. �l.£. .SL� �`�� /�-n��-� s: �f'- 7.36 � �� h �. � �� -�� 3 y� %.3,3 U � ` �, /�� ► , 7.�30 � ,� !.� ti' E �i � :•- �ca.4 ��.�J I'� ��-� �- �-�,�-� �. y?3 7yo9 �33� .,� 6� ,�� C��- .� �, . � . . . � 0 i Planning Commission,Meeting September 15, 1982 Paq�e 17 , . + ` � , . ._ � � � � � . � � , /,. � � ,�, : � �, , �, . � �/ � �a,�, ,�G � , I �� _ �' E� � Kb �S ��.� � � r�a �I l�cl� �� o � � " �- .t _ �"' � � 73 3 0 %"� R, i3 �3 'Z 3 � �C,�.c�� %3 99 c� �3 �/ ?3� � .f�..� '�� I ` J Q� , .� . 7� 3 / �,,/�,6Qrd C'� �P�J6 7�3 o GoNCcRte C,,R�t S�� tie.a,G� /,�.�'vte � ��rd /�la�v� /(i� 1'3�m. ...� ��° �3 �ar.,��, d� /V� 7341 �,��,� lNti� 7359� � � �a,fv�- %ss� ' c�-y.�i� %'o��%� �� 7� G C�E�L �`i �,�} C��, ,�-{l . �. /�� oi�,eve sc�. /�.� 1 �i0 TQ�w�. Cl� �q�0 �� v ►�- � -e � I �o�� l�d ru! �}re�' 1�.�. � I SRv —�R ��v� �o T� �� . ti. � v� �s ,� �� Planning Correnission Meeting September 15, 1982 Page 18 �� i , :I �, ,, � ��, _ _ . ,ri:..� � � (,c�a� `� . c�N.�.ct� '� �vn� _ �� ._��. , � � � �� 1��-1 � e � c- ��v�� ✓ l%Z��i . ��,�'t,cu' � l��.r�.e.. ��m'� �� . 1 � � �� ^ � �� w / ) � 0 .:,- � i . .�.�• � �3Gv i��iP� i r-�'�c,E �J � 73� C�►� L��' 73 2 0 �'evl Cer � �uh-�re �J . E 2 ��'�- i��(��-�� .C�2 7e3/o �t-r,�� .�� % �, 73� / �.�,, -� �.�/'✓�., /'1-E . �� a o � �• �- %3a / � z�-�� . %I�� '13 � � 733� ��Q / � 3�0 7330 �� 7�� 73 60 7�5/9P 7y4� �� 76/S /(0l.5 �GoL ' �(oo 73Y/ � 7��3 �sT� �� o v S� � � . � a�c� ��-i � �' �. �� b�'�.. . � . � �� '�;� � � G�� '� � �-�<<` ��.. �, . � y�� z � � �� . � � `� .�,� �°�,�. �� '; , , �� 7�i�� - ��' - . �. �'� � � �' ,�.� . ,�.�- ,� :�'1 �;. � �� '/ �C . �x� �� . �� : �� r � � �� Planning Cor�nission �eeting September 15, 1982 Pa e 19 �''1 � � ' ' % 3 �J 0 � A�r��-o�..! Q�'�i 11J� - � i ,�' - : �' , r�o � � �.� /�.,�.� h � �_ _ � � 93�6 �' .� �� N� . �'' X ,�,� 53� �,cG�, 0 ��'\ �� c • �l � • � •