PL 05/18/1983 - 30594,�
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 18, 1983
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairwoman Schnabel called the May 16, 1983, Planning Commission meeting to
order at 7:34 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Ms, Schnabel, Mr. Oquist, Ms, Gabel, Mr. Saba, Mr. Kondrick,
Mr. Nielson (for Mr. Svanda)
Members Absent: Brian Goodspeed
Others Present: Bill Deblon, Associate Planner
L. Robert Erickson, 85 - 3rd Ave. S.E., New Brighton
Margaret A. Seger, 1407 - 73rd Ave. N.E.
See attac�ed list
. . . . . . .. .. ... .
APPROVAL OF MAY 4, � 1983, PLANNING CONNIISSION �IIIVl1TES:
XDaION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY 1�2. OQUIST� TO APPROVE TXE 1�1AY 4� 1383�
i� PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN.
-�.'
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRWOMAN SCXNABEZ DECLARED THE 1NOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #83-03 BY�L. ROBERT ERICKSON:
Rezone t e West Na f of ot , an aT o�o�s ��a� 7r,�cia Lane
Addition, from R-1 (single family dwelling areas� to R-3 (general multiple
family dwellingsj to allow tfie construction of a 14�un1''t condominium
project, the same being 1133-1145 Mississippi Street N.E.
MOTION BY 1JR. SABA� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC XEARING ON
ZOA #83-03 BY L. ROBERT ERICKSON.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOT,ING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC
XEARING OPEN AT 7:36 P.M.
Mr. Deblon stated the property is located on the corner of Mississippi St. and
TH 65, west of Lucia Lane. The proposal is for a rezoning from R-1 to R-3,
and would consist of a condominium development where the occupants form an
association and own the land jointly. The proposal is for three twin
homes : combined with an eight-unit carriage-manor type home.
Mr. Deblon stated the project has been moved over to the west away from Lucia
lane with access onto Mississippi because of the developer's sensitivity to
^ the existing single family residences.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 18, 1983 PAGE 2
�
Ms. Gabel asked if the project met a71 the setback requirements.
Mr. Deblon stated a variance from 35 feet to 25 feet would be needed on the
north property line.
Mr. Deblon stated the plan meets all the parking requirements, and there is the
potential to make visitor parking.
Mr. Deblon stated that condominiums can be dissolved and the properties sold
individually in the future, so Staff fiad to take into consideration the possi-
bility of the properties 6eing split��witfiout further variances. With the new
zero lot line subdivision regulation,some of tF�e double bungalow units could qo
zero lot line as a twin fiome. This fias 6een allowed in Fridley in the past.
This plan does meet most of tf�e requiremenis for a possible subdivision in the
future. �
Mr. Deblon made the following additional comments on the proposal.
1. A variance is required from 35' to 25' on the north property line.
2. Fencing and landscaping is required for district separation.
3. Drainage plan is required (Rice Creek Watershed District has to
apprave this drainage plan).
4. Concrete curbing and 6lacktop per standard code requirements
5. Will need an additiona7 20 foot easement for bikeway/wa7kway ,roadway. ,�
6. Engineering Department Fias a concern a6out the location of the
access onto Mississippi St. in relationship to the access onto
Highway 65. The distance is only 160 feet. With the County's
plans for widening Mississippi for a right turn lane and the number
of cars already existing on Mississippi, Engineering a�as very
concerned that there could be congestion and some problems.
Mr. Deblon stated there are some rather deep lots north of this property. He
did not know if any of the owners of these lots had any plans for subdivisior�.
He stated there is enough square footage to divide, but they would not be very
optimum lots because of the traffic on Highway 65; however, the City has to
consider any future access to these lots. It was a judgement call that might
have to be determined as to whether these lots would ever be split.
Ms. Schnabel asked where'tfie garages were located and which way the buildings
would face.
The petitioner, Mr. Erickson stated the garages were located in the inner court.
The rear elevation and backyards will face Lucia Lane. The rear elevation will
have a deck and patio door on the upper level one-half flight up.
Ms. Schnabel asked if Mr. Erickson had built any of these types of d�vellings in
the metropolitan area.
Mr. Erickson stated he has built in Coon Rapids, Eden Prairie, New Hope, and
Brooklyn Park.
:,� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, lNAY 18, 1983� PAGE 3
Ms. Schnabel asked that of the buildings he has built,were any of them rental
units?
Mr. Erickson stated that since 1980, he has bui7t only owner-occupied. All
these units will be owner-occupied and wi7] be FHA/VA approved.
Ms. Schnabe7 asked the approximate price of the units.
Mr. Erickson stated the twin homes wil] run in the mid-60's with the double
bungalows being just under that.
Ms. Schnabel asked what type of screening Mr. Erickson would use between this
property and the R-1 properties.
Mr. Erickson stated he was thinking of wooden fencing; however, because the lot
is so heavily wooded, it was hard to decide what to do for landscaping. He
stated he would save every tree he could.
Mr. Saba asked why the rear of the double bungalows would face Lucia Lane.
Mr. Erickson stated there were two reasons for this: (1) He wanted to keep the
project centralized so everyone cou7d use the same road for snow plowing and
other maintenance; and (2) the biggest complaint from the neighborhood seemed to
'"� be to not put any more traffic on Lucia Lane. By facing the buildings in, this
kept the traffic off Lucia Lane.
Ms. Schnabel stated she was a little bit concerned about the plainness of the
rear of the buildings facing Lucia Lane when all the rest of the homes on Lucia
Lane are facing front. It seemed inconsistent with the n�ighborhood, yet she
understood what Mr. Erickson was saying in terms of traffic.
�r. Erickson stated this is not inconsistent in condo developments. A number
of condo developments are done this way.
Mr. Saba asked Mr. Erickson if he would consider turning the buildings around
to face Lucia Lane.
Mr. Erickson stated he would consider turning the buildings around; however,
because of the heavily wooded area, he did not think the buildings could be
seen that well from Lucia Lane anyway. If the buildings were turned around,
a lot of trees would be lost because of the dr�veways.
Ms. Schnabel asked for questions and concerns fram the people in the audience.
Mr. Russell Burris, 1150 Mississippi St., stated he would like to submit to the
Planning Commission a copy of his objections. He reviewed it for the Commission:
1. Spot zoning.
,-� 2. Traffic congestion - exit on Mississippi St. wouid be hazardous.
r" 3. Good or poor construction and cost per unit rental or homeowner.
4. Sewer problems - Burris and Lane are on dead end�sewer line. City
has to backflush this from time to time to keep sewer line open. A
separate sewer line to Lucia Lane is a must for which the homeowners
would be assessed on their yaxes.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 18, 1983 PAGE 4
�.
5. What would prevent an investor fran buying a unit and renting it out?
6. Garbage pickup - where would cans be placed?
7. 14 units probably would mean up to 28 cars. How many chi]dren?
8. Back of condo faces Lucia Lane which would not�enhance the�neighborhood.
That would also mean children playing in backyard and running out on
Lucia Lane.
Mr. Burris stated that a few years back, the City of Fridley hired a reputable
zoning company, and paid good money for them to rezone Fridley. Said company
conformed the original findings of R-1 and recommended this property remain R-1.
Mr. Burris stated it has been the concensus of the homeowners surrounding this
property that three nice residentia] homes could be built on the property. This
would then solve the prob]em once and for all. The homeowners would like to see
this area developed as it should, according to the regulations and requirements
of the zoning comnission.
Ms. Schnabe7 read the following letter from June Johnson, 6600 Lucia Lane:
"Inasmuch as I cannot attend your meeting tonight with reference to the
property on Mississippi and Highway 65, I would like to express my thoughts
on the matter. Lucia Lane has been zoned for single family homes for many
years with the exception of the apartments on the north end of the Lane.
I do not feel it to be proper to have a multiple dwelling of the size ,-�
� proposed for the corner property. I feel there would be too much disrup- ,
tion of traffic because of the entryway on Mississippi. Traffic going in
either direction will be hampered by the cars going into or out of the lot.
I purchased this home with the belief that this would remain a single
family area, and I would like to have it remain so so that my property
val ues wi ] 1 no�t be affected. We have a 1 ot of extra traffi c from the
apartments and the Knights of Columbus Hall at the north end."
Mr. Clarence Timo, 6517 Lucia Lane, presented a written petition for denial
and objection to the rezoning request. He stated his objections were essentially
the same as those expressed by Mr. Burris.
1. Spot rezoning
2. Traffic prob�ems �nd hazards
a. Traffic from KC Hall and apartments to the north already cause
congestion.
b. Highway 65 and Mississippi St. intersection already has a
history of many serious (and some fatal) accidents.
c. The driveway area within the complex would be like a huge parking
lot, with possibly not enough room to safely accomnodate up to
28 vehicles. Traffic movement within the area would pose dangers
to residents and small children.
d. Heavy traffic flow on all three sides of the proposed site would
definite7y pose a safety hazard to chi7dren whose play areas wou7d
be adjacent to the traffic. �
.,
��
�
�
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 18, 1983 PAGE 5
3. Depreciation of home values
a. Loss of beautiful trees
b. D�plexes and multip]e dwel7ings are not as carefully maintained
in genera7 as single family homes. �
4. Burden on homeowners
a. Sewer and water mains are not equipped to handle such a large
increase in popu7ation in such a small area. A sewer back-up
prob7em a]ready exists.
5. Increased density would not be consistent with urban and city planning
which is designed to protect the quality of residential ]ife.
6. Residents bought homes with the knowledge this property was zoned R-1,
and they want the area to remain R-1.
Ms. Bystram, 6533 Lucia Lane, stated her concern was with off-street parking.
Besides the 14 units with possibly two cars for each unit, there are also going
to be guests. Sometimes it is easier to park on tfie street, and the only p7ace
to park would be on Lucia Lane. With the apartments north on Lucia, there is
ample parking, but still there are cars parking on the street. That had to be
stopped with "no parking" signs in front of the homes.
Ms. Schnabel asked if there was guest parking within the interior of the
development.
Mr. Deb]on stated that according to the first draft plan, there is no guest
parking, but some areas f�ave 6een discussed for guest parking.
Ms. Irene Haedtke, 6540 Lucia Lane, stated she would be very unhappy if she was
"boxed" in by this development. There are beautiful trees on this lot, and in
looking at the drawing of the development, she knew there would not be one oak
tree left on that lot. Single family homes would be fine, because some of the
trees could be saved. For ecology reasons, she did not think the development was
feasible.
Mr. Eugene Lane, 1132 Mississippi St., stated he has lived in Frid]ey for 32 years.
In the morning between the hours of 6:00 and 9:00 and between 4:00 and 7:00 in
the afternoon, the intersection at Mississippi and Highway 65 is very busy. It
is not feasib7e to put tf�at much additional new traffic onto Mississippi.
Mr, Henry Melcher, 6500 Pi'erce�St., stated he would like to reinforce what the
residents have already said. At 7:00 a.m, he has trouble making a left hand turn
onta Mississippi. At 3:00-5:00 p.m., the cars are backed up past Lucia Lane
past his house to get through the Mississippi�Highway 65 intersection. Mr. Timo
had talked about the great number of accidents at this intersection, and Mr. Melcher
stated this could be reinforced by looking at the police reports.
Mr. Mel cher stated he and h.is wlfe paced tfus area off . and � t6is deve7 opment
went into this area, there would virtually no� be any oak trees�ieft on the lot.
He stated this is also too high a density to put into tFiis area.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING,�MAY 18, 1983 � PAGE 6 �
Mr, Cory Bystram, 6533 Lucia Lane, stated his house would be facing the back
end of the two double bungalows. He stated he has been delivering papers for
six years, and �e knows a little about what people leave in their back yards.
He did not think they should have to look at these back yards and what might be
left there. If there is only one garage for each unit, where are people going
to store their lawn mowers, equipment, bicycles, and other things people usually
store in a garage?
M�. Joe Randall, 1210 Mississippi St., stated his family was involved in an acci-
dent at the intersection of Mississippi and Highway 65. He stated he rides the
bus and has a difficult time crossing Highway 65 to catch the bus. It is a highly
congested area. The oak trees are fantastic. He would like to see this area stay
zoned residential as the zoning commission originally said.
Ms. Bystram, 6533 Lucia Lane, stated that in hearing the price range of the condo
units, there is likely to be a lot of families with small children. She did not
see any additional planning for play areas for these c�ildren.
Mr. Dean Thomas, 6550 Lucia Lane, stated he also agreed with everything that has
been said. He would be very unhappy to see this development. It is too many
people in too small an area, and they would lose the beautiful trees.
Mr. Darrel Goerdt, 6610 Lucia Lane, stated earlier in the meeting Mr. Deblon
had mentioned the deep lots and whether any of the owners of these lots would ^
consider subdividing their lots in the future. He stated he bought his lot
because it is a deep lot, and he would never consider subdividing it.
Mr. Erickson stated that some of the remarks he had heard seem to imply that
second class citizens will 6e going into this development. He disagreed 100%.
Tbere will be a homeowners' association which fias very rigid rules, so there wil]
not be any trashy back yards. The maintenance is all hired out and none of the
owners have any responsibility for the upkeep.
Ms. Gabel stated she agreed with Mr. E�ickson. It has been her experience that
homeowners' associations do a very good job in maintaining a condo project.
She also agreed with the cor�nent that with the price range, these units will
probably be first family homes and starter homes, and t�ere probably would be a
lot of chi]dren. She t�a��fi t the idea of a play area shou7d 6e considered in
the project.
Mr. Erickson stated he would be paying a large park fee and he felt that was
adequate. He thought the bulk of the buyers will be empty nesters, retired people.
T�is is based on the flow of buyers that are turning up in the different condo
projects around the metropolitan area--Apple Valley, Eden Prairie, North Oaks,
Coon Rapids.
Ms. Joyce Swanson, 6601 Lucia Lane, stated this was all pure speculation, and
they really do not know who will move into these units. This is an R-1 zoning,
and there will be a density pro6lem, traffic problems, and sewer and water problems�
There will be no oak trees. There will be c�i]dren. There will be parking on
Lucia Lane, and people will be walking through back yards.
�, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING,�MAY 18,�1983 � � PAGE 7
1 -
Ms. Bystram stated that at this point, she thought they had to be realistic
and maybe there needs to be some kind of balance. If this property was rezoned
to R-3, was there any possibility of the developer reducing the number of units?
She would like to see tFiis as an option.
Ms. Schnabe] asked Mr. Erickson if he rrou]d consider reducing the number of units.
Mr. Erickson stated he wou]d not.
MOTION BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED 8Y 1�IIZ. SABA� TO C.LUSE TXE PUBLIC HEARING ON
ZOA #83-03 BY L. ROBERT ERICKSON.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC
NEARING CLOSED AT 9:20 P.M.
Mr. Saba stated that one of the main objections expressed by the citizens was
the sewer problem. Was there rea]ly a sewer problem?
, Mr. Deblon stated that was a question that would have to be answered by the
Engineering Department. Engineering had not expressed any concern regarding
this proposal. Routine maintenance is 6eing done continually on the sewer system.
He stated he wou7d check tF�e record to see if tF�ere would be a prob7em as far as
capacity and get this information back to tfie Planning Conanission or the City
,�—� Counci 1. �
�
Ms. Schnabel stated the sewer problem should definitely be checked with Engineering.
Also, no matter what development eventually goes on this lot, something e7se that
should be checked with Engineering is wfiat the County's intention is in terms of
a right turn lane.
Ms. Gabel stated she had to speak against the rezoning. She felt it was a spot
rezoning. The�zoning is inconsistent with the neighborF�ood and tF�e planning
done over the years. She was a]so concerned with the sewer, and they needed
more information a6out it. The traffic problems are obvious, but the biggest
problem she had with it was the spot rezoning.
Mr. Oquist stated he agreed with Ms. �abel. It was spot rezoning; however, some-
t�iing wi71 6e done wiih this property, and F�e did not tF�ink anyone wou7d be
putting in single family homes. He was also concerned a6out tfie traffic.
Mr. Kondrick stated it would be great to be able to leave that property vacant;
however, they have to consider the overall good of the community. Housing is
needed in the City. He liked the set-up of the homeowners' association. He also
could not imagine anyone wanting to live in a single family home on this corner.
He agreed that it was spot rezoning, but his main concern was the traffic.
Mr. Saba stated he did not have as many objections r�i�h the spot rezoning, because
he felt it would never be developed a� R-1� He had a prob7era wit� the density.
He would rather see the double bunga7ows facie�g Lucia Lane, and he wou]d prefer
!� to see two more double 6ungalows instead of the carriage-type homes.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 18, 1983 PAGE 8
Mr. Oquist stated the other side of the issue is that the City needs to provide
what is called "affordable housing", and this is affordable housing.
Ms. Schnabel stated she was concerned a6out the°density.� She felt it was more
units than she would like to see go into t�iis area. �She, too,shared the concern
about spot rezoning, 6ut also did not see single family F�omes ever going in
there.
Mr. Saba stated he liked the concept despite the objections. He could see a
deve]opment like this going in there eventually, but with fewer units.
Mr. Deblon stated he looked at the positioning of this development as creating
a quieter environment for the homes on Lucia Lane. He stated the concerns
expressed were very valid, but he thought this was a positive aspect of a deve7op-
ment of this nature.
1NOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO RECOMMEND TD CITY COUNCIL DENIAL
OF REZONING RE�,lUEST, ZOA 1�83-03, BY L. ROBERT ERICKSON, TO REZONE THE WEST HALF
OF LOT 4� AND ALL OF LOTS 5� 6 AND 7, LUCIA LA1VE ADDITION, FROM R-I (SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING AREAS) TO R-3 (GENERAL MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLINGS) TO AL7AW THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A 14-UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT, THE SAME BEING 1133-1145 _
MISSISSIPPI STREET N.E.
�",
Mr. Oquist stated the sewer issue and the County's p7ans for widening Mississippi �
and putting in a right turn lane should be resolved before this item goes to
the City Council.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRWQNAN SCANABEL DECLARED TNE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY l�II2. SABA, TO RECENE INTO TXE RECORD THE LETTERS
FROM RUSSELL BURRIS AND JUNE JONNSON AND THE PETITION FROM CLARENCE TIMO, AND TO
FORWARD THESE ON WITH THE MINUTES TD CITY COUNCIL.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Ms. Schnabel stated that qn June 6. the City Council would set the public hearing
for June 20.
2. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #83-01, MARGARET A. SEGER: Sp7it off the southerly
104.02 Feet of Lot 1, Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside, the same being
7650 Lakeside Road N.E. (Original Lot - 1586 Osborne Road N.E.)
Mr. Deblon stated this was an informal hearing as required by the subdivision
ordinance for a lot splita
Mr. Deblon stated this 7ot split was requested back in 1975. The request came
before the Planning Commission and the Planning Corm�ission recor�anended the ^
.�.
PLANNING COMPIISSION MEETING, MAY 18, 1983 PAGE 9
,�
petitioner have the property surveyed and that all utility easements be worked
out with NSP, Northwestern Bell, Minnegasco, Cable Television and the City
Engineering Dept, before going on to City Council (page 12, Planning Commission
minutes, June 25, 7975).
Mr. Art Seger stated he was representing his mot�er, Margaret Seger, who had to
leave the meeting earlier.
Mr. Deblon stated the lot is exceptionally deep, over 208 feet. The new lot
wou]d become 104 feet by 100 feet which wou7d more than exceed the requirements
for a buildable lot. He stated Staff �ad the following concerns:
1. The petitioner get a survey after the decision of the Planning Commission.
2. There is a park fee requirement (applicant is aware of this)
3. There be a bikeway/walkway easement and street easement on the front
lot along Osborne (tte be]ieved it was a 17' street easement and a 15'
bikeway/walkway easement total]ing 32 feet.)
Mr. Deblon stated this lot sp]it meets al] the requirements thus far per the
subdivision ordinance. He stated the sewer and water ]ines will be checked out
before the request goes before the City Counci7. Other than that, Staff did not
see any problems with the lot split.
� 1IOTION BY MR. OQUIST� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST� L.W. �183-01� BY MARGARET A. SEGER� TO SPLIT OFF
THE SOUTHERLY 104.02 FEET OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2, SPRING LAKE PAItK LAKESIDE, THE
SAME BEING 7650 LAKESIDE ROAD N.E. (ORIGINAL LOT - 1586 OSBORNE ROAD N.E.),
WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS:
Z. STAFF CLARIFY TXE AMOUNT OF EASEMENT 111EEDED OFF OSBORNE ROAD FOR
STREET AND BIKEWAY/WALKWAY.
2. STAFF CHECK Z�D SE£ IF ANY E.�1.SElyENTS WERE REQUIRED FROM THE UTILITY
COMPANIES AND CABLE TV. '
3. STAFF CLARIFY THE SEWER LINE.
4. THE APPLICANT GET A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY PRIOR TD THE CITY COUNCIL
MEETING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTIDN CARRIED
UNANIMDUSLY.
Ms. Schnabel stated this item would go to City Council on June 6.
3. REVIEW OF A PROPOSED ORD
NEW CHAPTER 101_ ENTITLED "ANIMAL
MOTION BY Mft. OpiT,IST, SECONDED 8Y MR. KONDRICK� TD CONTINUE REVZEW OF THE ANIMAL
ORDINANCE UNTIL T8E NEXT MEETING.
�� IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CNAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
.i'
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 18L 1983 PAGE 10 �"`
MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY 1�2. KONDRICK, TO.RECENE TgE MEMO DATED
MAY 18� 1983•, FROM JIM PHILLIPS, LEGAL INTERN.
UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWGaMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED TXE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. RECEIVE APRIL 27, 1983, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT Al1THORITY MINUTES:
1NOTIDN BY 1�2. OQi12ST, SECONDED BY 1HR. SABA, TO RECEIVE TXE APRI.L 27� 1983,
IiOUSING � REDEVELOPMENT AUTXORITY MINUTES.
The Commission members agreed they would like Mr. Boardman to come to a future
meeting and explain the HRA's financing process and tFLe Genera7 Reserve System.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL V0�7NG AYE� CXAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
5. RECEIVE MAY 5, 1983, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION BY MR.OQUIST, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL, TO RECENE TXE MAP 5� I983, XUMAN �,
RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CFIAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED THE MOTIDN
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
6. RECEIVE MAY 10, 1983, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES:
1yOTION BY MS . GABEL � SECONDED BY 1�2 . KONDRICK, TO RECENE THE 1NAY 10 � 1983 �
APPEALS C01�IMISSIDN MINUTES.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CNAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ADJOURNMENT:
..
MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A
VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED THE MAY l8� I983�
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:20 P.M.
Respectful7y subm' ted,
n
ynne aba
Recor ng Secretary
�
�
Q , G��� -
�J�� � i� ����
�
�
,
,
,
, �, _; � ,
,f ' ,'
_ ,
C �/��_,__�� � -
�� .�,".'`' � ' ��"�
� ��w� -
`/`�"��/`-�'�
�..'A� �
,--�
�'�`' ' �j/�O
�
��; � ��, ����:��
��
� \y�` v `/ -
'\ ✓1 il
�' ���� � '� �.�ti,
�� i
.; �'
;
�.�,� .��,��..� .
-� '�� ����
�
��Q.�.,.._ , 1
Cz��i /`�E����1
,�
���/ - �.. ��.
�C/o - ���- �'�'�
G s-�-o ,�.�,u�-c L�: � �=
6 ��'v l� �-v.� � -Yl- � .
� �s-d �,y�.� � ��� �� � .
� S� 7 � v�,`,� �,� �/�. ,
�- -
j � . Lai
L" � d / � /�� f
%
��� � " ���,�. � �.
6 S SD �i-���. �-o� �, � '
(�J ��d �
�� _
���6�� � ��, ��
r
/ � l Gf � l ���� � . ' � �F J
/� �/�
/��i ,����� �� `�-
5 7a � � Z �T. ti,�
�� • ,CL�� ��� / � ` ��%!�� .
,,
/'� ��x 3z z� �
Cp � 33 l._.��, �.,,, .,� �-; d.S�.�.� , 1'/� �.
lpS33 L �'C/Q Il1 r �i�/ �/P � vl1�I •
y