The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 05/09/1984 - 6834City of Fridley AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY, MAY 9, 1984 7:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: APRIL 18, 1984 1- 7 1. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP �84-05, 8- 13 BY MICHAEL S. MALONE: Per Section 205.2A.4., D, of �he Fridley City Code, to allow the construction of a 16 ft. by 22 ft. addition to an existing structure in CRP-2 zoning (flood fringe) on Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block U, Riverview Heights, the same being 635 Ely Street N.E. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: BY EDWARU ANDRAJAGK: Per Section 2DS.0/.1, 3,A ot the frlaley City Code, to allow the construction of a second assessory building, a 22 ft, by 24 ft. detached garage, on Lots 7 and 8, Block 22, Nyde Park, the same being 5832 3rd Street N.E. 14 - 18 3. PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #84-02, BY ROBERT D. 14 - 23 � E ut�Hrcuntk: Hezone rrom rt-i �one ramiiy awe�iings) to k-s general multiple dwellings) part of Lots 3 and 21, not taken for street purposes, and all of Lots, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 4 and 10, and Lots 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20, Block 20, fridley Park; and parts of Lots 3 and 24, not taken for street purposes, and all of Lots 4, 5, 6 and 7 and 19, 20, 27, 22 and 23, Block 14, Fridley Park, to allow the development of a 52 unit condominium complex between East River Road and Ashton Avenue on 61st and 61 1!2 Way N.E. #kf4-U3, LUrI HUMtJ UY hK1ULtY, tiY HUt�tltl U. UtGAKUNtK: fSetng a Replat of parts of Lots 3 and 24, not taken for street purposes and Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 29, 20, 21, 22 and 23, 61ock 19, Fridley Park; and parts of Lot 3 and 21, not taken for street purposes, and all of Lots 4, 5, b, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20, Block 20, Fridley Park, to allow the development ofal3 4 unit condominium complex between Ashton Avenue and East River Road on 61st and 61 1/2 Way N.E. tST WUUUt,KtJl 11HY I 151 t;HUK�H: P2Y' SQCt10fl ZUb. U`J. I, 3, R, OT the fridley City Code, to allow the construction of a multi- purpose gymnasium type huilding on Outlot l, Holiday Hills Second Addition, the same being 6875 University Avenue N.E. 24 - 32 33 - 40 Planning Comnission Agenda Pa9e 2 May 9, 1984 PAGES 6. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #84-04, BY CYNTHIA J. BRAAM: Split 40 - 44 off the North 149 feet of Lot 6, Block 2, Spring Valley Addition to make a new building site at 1443 Rice Creek Road. (Petitioner knows property is land locked) 7. SALE OF PUBLIC PROPERTIES PROCEDURE 45 - 49 8. RECEIVE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALTIY COMMISSION MINUTES: APRIL 17, BLUE 1984 9. RECEIVE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: APRIL 19, WHITE , .,,,. 10. RECEIVE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: APRIL 23, 198A GREEN 11. RECEIVE APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: APRIL 24, 1984 YELLOW 12. RECEIVE ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES: APRIL 24, 1984 ORCHID 13. OTHER BUSINESS: ADJOURNMENT: CITY �F fRIDLEY pLANNING COMMISSIQN MEETING, APRIL 18, 1984 CALL T� ORDER: Chairwoman Schnabel called the April 18, 1984, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:33 p,m. ROLL CAIL: Me�bers Present: Ms. Schnabel, Mr. Oquist, Ms. Gabel, Mr. Kondrick, Mr. Saba, Mr. Goodspeed Members Absent: Mr. Svanda Others Present: Jim Robinson, Planning Specialist Gerald G. Johnson, 712 River Lane, Anoka Robert Erickson, 2178 - llth St. N,W., New Brighton Mark Haggerty, 6401 University Ave. N.E. APPROVAL OF MARCH 28 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MD:('ZON BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY F4t. SABA, TYJ APPROVE THE MARCX 28, I984, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN. Ms. Schnabel stated that at this meeting, the Commission asked for some clarification from the City Council regarding park fees. Mr. Robinson stated a memo was sent to the City Council. The Council's inter- pretation was what he had said at the March 28th meeting, that on a 9-lot plat, the park fee was on the 9 lots. Mr. Blomberg had questioned paying a park fee on the 9th lot, because there was an existing dwelling on it. Mr. Robinson state� that on a lot split, a$750 park fee is paid on each new lot that is created. However this is not a lot split issue but rather a plat. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED TNE MOTION CARRIED UNANZMOUSLY. APPROVAL OF APRIL 4 1984 PLAP�NING C01�iMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY M5. GABEL� TO APPROVE TXE APRZL 9, 1984� PLANNING Ctl^tMISSION MINUTE5 AS WRITTEN. UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL YOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MO^_'ION CARRIEA UNANIMOUSLY. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 18 19$4 PAGE 2 1. LO7 SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #84-03 BY GERALD B. JOHNSON: Split off the West Tj o ot , an a o ots ,, an 7, Tuc3a'Tane Addition, into three tracts as follows: Tract A: The north 40 feet of Lot 5, along with the North 90 feet of the East 20 feet of Lot 6, Lucia Lane Addition, the same being 6516 Lucia Lane N.E. Tract 6: That part of Lot 5 lying south of the North 90 feet of said Lot 5, and that part of the East 20 feet of said Lot 6, Lucia Lane Addition, the same being 6500 Lucia Lane N.E. Tract C: Lot 7, along with the West half of Lot 4, and that part of Lot 6 lying west of tf�e east 20 feet of said Lot 6, Lucia Lane Addition, the same 6eing 1133 and 1145 Mississippi Street N.E. Mr. Robinson stated this property was located north of Mississippi St., west of Lucia Lane, and east if Highway 65. The property presently consists of Lots 5, 6, 7, and the west ha]f of Lot 4, The petitioner is requesting that this property be split in such a manner so that Lot 5 will be 6asically sp7it in half with 20 ft. from Lot 6 being added to Lot 5, and the remainder of Lot 6 and Lot 7 being added to the ha]f of Lot 4, to make three tracts, Tract A, Tract E3, and Tract C. Mr. Robinson stated Staff fias sane definite concerns tfiat have been discussed with the petitioner, Mr. Gerald JoEvison. One of the Staff concerns is that the legal descriptions are quite lengthy, and StafP feels Mr. Johnson should apply for a plat ratfier than a lot split and noi allow tfiis type of reworking of the 7and with a lot split. Mr. Robinson stated another Staff concern was the traffic on Mississippi St. Witr two R-1 lots on Lucia Lane and one rather �arge tract of over 42,000 sq, ft, off Mississippi St., Staff fe]t access sf�ouid be required off Lucia Lane with no access onto Mississippi St. He stated that presently there are plans to widen Mississippi St, and put in a median so access onto Mississippi would be very 7imited. Mr. Robinson stated the third Staff recor�endation would be a 15 ft. bikeway/ walkway easement aiong Mississippi St. Ms. Schnabel asked the petitioner, Mr. Johnson, if he would ]ike to make some statements re9arding his proposa7 for this property, Mr. Mark Haggerty stated he was an attorney representinq Mr. Geraid Johnson. He stated Mr. Bob Erickson, who was a contractor, was also at the meeting, Mr. Haggerty stated he would first give the Planning Commission members a little background on this parcel of land. He stated this parcel of land has been before the Pianning Commission and City Council about six times in the last six years. There have been proposals for everything from restaurants and office buildings to duplexes and condominiums. Mr. Haggerty stated the protilem was a"catcF��-22" which fias been created 6y the City of Fridley. On Lucia Lane, with tfie Knights of Coium6us and the apartment buildings, the neighbors ciaim there is a tremendous traffic problem down Lucia Lane. Obvioasly, they cannoi 9et access to Highway 65. The City PLANNING COMMISSI�N MEETING aPRIL 18 1984 PAGE 3 claims there is a tremendous traffic problem on Mississippi St. He said they have met with the neighbors many times, and the neighbors say they want no access onto Lucia Lane. The City wants no access onto Mississippi St., even though at this time, Mr. Johnson could pull a building permit on Lots 7, 6, and 5, and the City could not do anything about it. Mr. Naggerty stated he had just become involved with this proposal that day, and he believed the dimensions on the drawing were not quite accurate, FU�at was really meant ►tas to have a Tract A and Tract B and two buildable lots on Tract C, making four buildable residential lots. Mr. Haggerty stated Staff has talked about running a road in from Lucia Lane. That would be great, except for two things: (1) the cost; and (2) the neighbors on Lucia Lane would be very upset. The neighbors have stated they want nice residential homes and try to preserve the beautiful oak trees that are on the 7and, in order to maintain the residential character of the neighborhood and not create a traffic problem. Mr. Haggerty stated they are asking the Planning Commission, and ultimately the City Council, to compromise. The City says there are traffic problems on Mississippi St., and the neighbors don't want traffic congestion on Lucia Lane and the neighbors do not want multiple development. So, they are propos- ing to take one lot off �tississippi St „ put two lots on Lucia Lane, so there are two lots on Mississippi, as opposed to three lots. He stated he did not know what �ould happen with the westerly portion of Lot 4. It would make a nice backyard for someone. The petitioner is primarily concerned with the four residential lots without the additional cost of having to put in a road that would meet city standards, That would run another $60,OOD. With a total square footage of 64,000 maximum, that just doesn't justify a road, Ms. Schnabel asked either Mr. Johnson or Mr, Haggerty to comment on the staff recormnendations, particularly the first recomnendation that because of the complex 1ega1 descriptions, the City would like to see a plat. Mr. Haggerty stated he did not feel the legal descriptions were that complex, Regarding the drawing, he felt Tract C should have been two tracts, and that could be corrected. If the legal descriptions were too complicated, they would find that out very fast at the County Recorder's office. Under state law, if the legal descriptions are too complicated, the County Recorder has the right to reject them, In checking with the County Clerk, these legal descriptions did not appear to be that objectionable. Ms. Schnabel stated she was concerned about Mr. Haggerty's cortenent that the drawing was not totally correct. Mr. Hag9erty stated the drawing showed adding 20 ft. from Lot 6 to Lot 5, and he believed that sfiould be around 15 ft., which would create four buildable lots with minimum square footages and minimum frontages. PLANNING COMMI55ION MEETING APRIL 18 19$4 PAGF 4 Mr, Haggerty stated they could drop the westerly portion of Lot 4, and just work with Lots 7, 6, and 5. That parcel was not necessary for the minimum square footages on Lots 7 and 6. Mr. Haggerty stated Mr. Johnson has held thts property for a long time, and he pays $3,000/year in real estate taxes on the property. He stated they would request that the Planning Commission approve this lot split request, taking into consideration some of the problems there have been in the past, and the change of adding ]5 ft. to Lot 5, rather tfian 20 ft., as indicated on the drawing, Mr. Oquist stated he really could see nothing wrong with this request. With only two driveways caning out onto Mississippi St., that would only be 2-4 additiona7 cars coming out onto Mississippi. Ms. Schnabel suggested the possibility of combining the driveways for Lots 7 and 6 so that both homes wauld be accessing onto Mississippi from one single driveway. Mr. Haggerty stated the problems were basical]y legal and marketing problems. If people are going to buy a single family hane, they want a sinqle family �ome where everything on it is theirs. If a driveway is combined, it has to be done right. There has to be a reciprocal easement and reciprocal maintenance agreement that runs with the land, He stated that kind of tfiing scares people off and makes it very difficult to market a single family fiome. In his experience, it has 6een a very difficu7t problem. Ms. Schnabel stated she was a 7ittle uncanfortable with this request with no public hearing, considering that in the past history of this property, the neighbors have been very vocal, She realized that a lot split did not require a public hearing by ordinance, but she still felt uncomfortable without having some kind of vehicle for those neighbors to make comment on this proposal. Mr. Naggerty stated that in the meetings with the neighbors, of all the plans they submitted to the neighbors, when they started getiing down to the 8, 7, and 6 unit density level, the concern from the neighbors lessened. Now, they are down to the 4-unit leve7. He stated they could have three units without any trouble, but they are trying to accomnodate the City by putting one more ' driveway onto Lucia Lane, as opposed to Mississippi, and stili make the total package economica7ly feasible enough so that something can �e done. He stated it is getting to the latter tfiird of Apri7, and they would like to get going, To go through a public hearing process at this time would be very burdensome. Mr, Robinson stated one thing he was a little con�erned about was that, with the original lot split, the westerly part of Lot 4 was included, If they do as Mr. Haggerty suggested ahd drop that portion, that piece of land would be completely landlocked. PL�NNING COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 18 19II4 PAGE 5 Mr. Haggerty agreed, but he stated they are wi7ling to give up develop�ent on that lot in order to be able to gei some development going on these four new lots. Mr. Oquist stated that of a71 the plans they have seen for this property, this segned to be the most viable plan. Mr, Robinson suggested that 5 ft, fran Tract A be added to Tract B, making a little more room on Tract B because of greater setbacks on a corner lot. MOTION BY ltR. OpUIST� SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF IAT SPLIS REQUEST, L,S. #84-03, FOR THE CREATION OF TRAC2 A AND TRACT B� LEAVING L(1TS 6 RND 7 AS BUILDABLE LOTS, WITH TXE FOLLCIETING STIPULATIONS: 1. A 15 £T. BSKEWAY/WALXWAY EASEMENT ON MZSSI5SIPP7 ST. 2. CORRECTION SN CLERICAL ERROR THAT TXE 20 FT, FROM LOT 6 TD BE ADDED TO ZAT 5 8E CHANGED TO IS FT. AND THAT THE NECES5RRY DOCUMENTS BE PRESENTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE TNIS ITEM GOES TO CITY COUNCIL, 3. A CORRECTED DOCUMENT BE SUBMSTTED TO SHE CITY COUNCIL WITH TXE RECOMMENDATION THAT TNE FRONTAGE ON TRACT A BE CHANGED FROM 90 FT, TO 85 FT., ADDING 5 FT. TO TRACT B, UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED T17E MOTZON CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated this would go to City Council on May 7, 2. DISCUSSION ON TARGET PROPOSAL FOR PROPERTY NORTH OF CITY NALL: Mr, Robinson stated the plans for the Target facility north of City Hall are very quickly becoming finalized. and 5taff felt they should come to the Planning Commission and explain the Target proposal to the Commission. Mr. Robinson stated it involves the area north of City Hall, 4,$ acres. Target will be constructing a 75,000 sq, ft. building, three stories, with a possible expansion of 15-16,000 sq, ft. for administrative operations and computer-type operations. Target will be relocating employees from Paco Industrial Park. This is a$5 million faci7ity and will create $200,000/year in taxes. Mr. Robinson stated Target will be using similar type brick and stucco and the same p7aza motif wil] be carried throughout the area. Landscaping wil] also be consistent with the total deve7opment. Mr, Robinson stated that primarily the access to the parking lot will be off the service drive to City Hall. There will be more limited access off Mississippi St. The parking lot wi11 have 311, 9' x 18', stalls. PLANNItaG C�MMISSION MEETING APRIL 18 1984 PAGE 6 The Planning Commission members wondered why Target did not have their own driveway off 5th St, past the median, rather than having a shared driveway with City Hal] and the Police Dept. Mr. Robinson stated that right now the City is working on retocation of present businesses on the property, and everything seems to be going well. 3, RECEIVE MARCH 26 1984 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. XONDRICK� S£CONDED BY MR. OQUiST, TO RECEIVE THE MAR. 26� 1984, PARKS 6 RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES, UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CNAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED THE MOTIDN CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 4. RECEIVE MARCN 27 1984 ENERGY COPIMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY 1i42. KONDRICK, TO RECZEVE THE MAR. 27� I984� ENERGY COMMZSSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE WTE, RLL VOTING AYE, CHAIRFIOMAN SCHNABEL DECI.ARED THE MOTSON CARRIED UNANZMOUSLY. 5. RECEIVE APRIL 5 1984 HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION�BY MR. GOODSPEED, SECONDED BY FIIZ. KCJPDRICK� 5ECONDED BY MR. O�C12ST, TO gECEIVF: TNE FF'RI'. Si I984, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSIdJ MINUTES. Mr, �oodspeed sta*ed the Canmission members came up with their recommenda- tions to City Councii for human service funding of ]983 CDBG funds. He stated those recommendations were stated in a motion to the City Council on page 5. Ms. Schnabel stated the Planning Comnission appreciated all the work the Human Resources Commissim has done in coming up with these recommendations for human service funding, The Planning Corranission was in agreement with what the Human Resources Commission had recommended. UPON A VOICE VOTE, RLL VOTING AYE, CHAZRWOMAN SCXNABEL bECLARED TNE MOTION CARRZED UNANIMDUSLY, 6. RECEIVE APRIL 10 1984 APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTZON BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO RECEIVE THE APRZL Z9, .2984, APPEAIS COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� .ALL YDTSNG AYE, CHRIR470MAN SCHNABEL DECLAP.ED THF. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 18 1984 PAGE 7 ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY HR, KONDRZCK� SECONDED BY MH. 0(JU25T, TO ADJOURN THE MEBTIP7C,. UPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMRN SCHNABEL DECLARED TNE APRZL I8, 5984, PZANNING COMMISSION MEETING RDJOURNED AT 9:35 P.M. Respectfully subiitted, C c� L Ve Saba Recording Secretary � //�- PUBLIC HEARIN6 BEFORE THE PLANNINr, COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Comnission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, May 9, 1984 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 P.M, for the purpose of: Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP #84-05, by Micfiael J. Malone, per Section 205.24.4 (d� of the Fridley City Code, to allow the construction of a 16 ft. x 22 ft. addition to an existing dwelling in CRP-2 zoning (flood fringe) on Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block U, Riverview Heights, the same being 635 Ely Street N.E. Any and e>> persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and p7ace, VIRGINIA SCHNABEL CHAIRWOMAN PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: April 25, 1984 May 2, 1984 e a MAILING LIST Mr. Michael J. Malone 635 Ely St, N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. Robert J. Trebus 684 Ely St. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. John Koczur 680 Ely St. N,E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs, William Wagner b81 Ely Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Minnesota State of Intrust 65� Ely Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Richard Zeglen 540 Ely Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. John Geis b30 Ely St. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr, & Mrs. Dale Dickson 600 Ely Street N,E. Fridley, MN 55432 Ms. Jean Werner 655 Ely St. N,E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Jeffrey Chesen 8057 Fairmont Street W,E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Ronald Taylor 590 Fairmont Street N,E. Fridley, MN 55432 Ms. Cheryl A. Rehnelt 8081 Broad Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Planning Commission 4/24/84 � CITY OF FRlOLQY� � �9J�� i�t9/ UN�VERSITY AVi. Nt. . FA�DtiY, MN. 6�7! fi1Z{6T'�-�p �E� �3 �� jy PUMiIH6 COM{ISSION CITY OOUNCIL: ST1PUlATIORS: x NAME il �e ha � X STREET IOCATIQN Uf P LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPROYED DISl1PPROYED 10 SP # ��'� rr� � f�y( � 3 APPROYED DISAPPROYED DATE NO L PRESENT ZONING CLA551FICATION �"'j EXISTING IfSE OF ACREAGE OF PROPERTY DESCRIBE SRIEfLY THE Section of the Lode: C-I� fJr tc,. PT NO��( APPLIED FOR: ,S . ��1. Has the present applicant previously sought to rezone, plet, obtain a lot split or variance or special use permit on the subject site or part of it? _�yes ✓ no. Yhat was requested and when? The undersigned understands that: (a) A list of a11 residents and owners of pro�er- ty within 20n feet wi11 be attached to this application. .. • • ' ' � ,. '(b) This application must be signed by ail a+ners of tAe property, or an expianation �iven why this is not the case. (tj Responsibility for aqy Jefect in the proceedings resulting from the failure to - list the names and addresss of ail residents and property a+enrs of propgrty in question, belongs to the undersigned. A sketch of proposed proQerty a�d structure must be drawn and attached, showing the fol)wing: 1. North direction. 2. Location of the proposed structure on the 1ot. 3. Dimensions of properiy, Qroposed structure, and fron and side setbacks. 4. Street names. 5. Location and use of adjace�t existing buildings (within 350 feet}. Tbe undersigned hereby deciares that all this application are true and correct. DATE // SI6NATUR� the facts and respresentations stated in G TELEPf�N£ NO 7 - � �� ao r y. � ;,, i_',�-� -•. �. � � SP #84-65 Malone 635 Ely Street 12 �/aod PlBin Cambvr 0 0 N N 0 B_� I__ _ �,�_ _ . _ B21 Sb =/o� pfain Cootou� n � IN h 0 ~ rn y 0 W z �_ ;� Y �2 =o � W N Z i N � � U � � z � ¢ W W 2 �tl z � W tl O AZ >' W `_`� ' ¢ � ��` J � m � � 0 � � Z H N � a�i 7 � G� u� N Q mZ n c � o �i t6 a� = p N 'a � � Q z d � � N � d � c �m O � :o �Z w¢ ma � � � ZU mW Oy � F- Z w J U � m E L c o' c a� � c O E C 0 N r 0 d � t�i � i. � m m m U c 0 U c m m N t U N N O U N N 0 C � _� + 0 x U 0 � m � E Z fl� H Onx �a Q � H U �9 w"' a n�> �aa w J SP �B4-05, Michael Malone 635 Ely Street N.E. � � �m N� m U m �s c� m a c >y m X y y �N a NY E c R m N�a x C f0 � O 61 y ad p L 1f7 Q� LV � it� N rn t � O > m m n. y X m' N �` O D O y c� dE O `-' d O � n iA x m rn �02 W�U } Z ¢ �oa �w� ��LL Z w J U N r N � m 3 O N c` 0 .� � 'v m O O o. � m � O Q G C m �� z O Q W J W 0 W � ¢ a Z � Q U � ¢ w U v� j; � � � O m �p�a io aav� °. � R A m � T m � Y � � �'O m �o'.°N 3 m � c n��m �d�« «Q � !6 � �� «; � � F C N �- O C� y m V^� 0��0 � UD W tn dac��c t i E o c _o�a�n� �Z¢�¢Z OOOOWO OQOOwQ LL�lLLLN7 F- Z W 1- } J W LLOQO~� ��J�� I `Z f Q N w m N O N u ro � N � d z C� m Q C CC G Y a S �o Z VI U O r-A Q aW�+ Uo� 0 � � Yry'y 4 N ai Z U � w m 13 622, i � I � 8Y0 �Y a2c PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING CQMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Co�nissian of the City of Fridley in the City Hatl at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, May 9, 1954 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 P.M. for the purpose of: Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP #84-05, by Edward J. Andrajack, per Section 205.07.1 {3) A, of the Fridley City Code, to allow the construction of a second assessory building, a 22 ft. by 24 ft. detached garage, on Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block 22, Hyde Park, the same being 5832 3rd Street N.E. Any and e�l persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. VIRGINIA SCHNABEL CHAIRWOMAN PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: April 25, 1984 May 2, 1984 ta -.� 15 Planning Comnission 4/24(84 MAILING LIST SP #84-06, Edward Andrajack 2nd Assessory Building at 5832 3rd Street N.E. Mr. Edward Andrajack 5832 3rd Street N.E, Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. Carl E. Sorensen 5856 3rd 5treet N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Ms. Dorothy A. Young 5807 3rd Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. 3 Mrs. Thomas Thomp�on 5846 3rd Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. Albert Campbell 5840 3rd Street N,E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr, & Mrs. Gerald Almlie 5826 3rd Street N.£. Fridley, MN 55432 Mrs. Lucille A. Bodin 5824 3rd Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 .�... :. _ � �fs .: CRY OF FAfDLlY� SUBJECT ' s.a, u�nveaa�rv �►vc r+�. SPECIAL I15E PEI�lIT ipIDLEY. MN. 6'3��! �it?1071-�� ,��a � , . . . . � ;R3a- 3�_cT r.l�.- - COlMISSION: APPROVED DISAPPROYED CITY OOt�ICII: . STIPULATIONS: 16 sat yo` �� APPROYED DISAPPROYEO OATE � MAME �� Lf ff /'CC3 0l , STREET LOCATION OF PRUPERTY LfGAI OfSCRIPTIOF{ Of:PROPER i i J . . � �=' .�'_'11.� PRfSENT 20NING CLASSIfICATION E%ISiING UUE Of PROPERTY Si �- NO►aSbo � ACREPG pF PROPERTY 80 X/3� .`�YbESLRIBE $RIEfLY THE SPECIAL USE APPLIED FOR: +�A�Y� ��n _—y-,P. �a Ul€�.�'e �u b� c►[ �a�4 T�"if/. Section of 2�' �-�L Has tbe present applicant previously sought to rezone. plat. obtain a 1ot"split or varianc� or special use permit o� the subject site or part of it? __�es��no. Mhat was requested and whent The undersigned understands tfiat: (a) A list of all residents and owners of proeer- ty within 20f1 feet M1i1 be attached to this application•. .. • • - • ,. � '(b) Thts appTication �nust 6e signed by ati owners of the p�opepty. or an expianation �iven rfiy tfiis is not the case. . list the�names�and addre�s of alliresident�andiproperty�owenrs of propertYuin to question, belongs to the undersigned. A sketch of proposed property and structure nust be drawn arid attached, showing the fotlowing: 1. North direction. 2. Locatio� of the proposed structure on the lot. 3. Dimensions of property, proposed structure. and fron and Side setbacks. 4. Street names. 5. Lxation and use of adjacent existing buildings (Mithin 350 feet). The undersigned hereby declares that a11 tfie facts and respreseMations stated in this appticatian are true and con�ect. DATE }' p"' � 5I6NATURf �—� / ADORE55 �� ' � � D ST, ��. TELEPHONE NO✓� / d %� � _,"" _�. � Y' � � � to � �8 i i��5 � � 6oii i �o�d I � �� I �11 0 � I I � i 41 * , � � .': 6�2 - B 6� . {,f,�z ,z � /f � SP #84-06 � . �• �zo`� `�__/ I , Q � a � � W Z F � ; 59 � S�St p S�9 To 950 z - N z' 4 � 584 6 _� Sa�v s&a4 f...., r1i;1 — --- — �''YlatL7_ " - —" — A•. r.. �G � 4,09 i I.obd' �� si J _ . � �� '4'� i� iA�9 i,o2� ,ee �� - 6�� . ;000 �., drajac 5832 3rd Street S9TH � y . � . �,oc iro 3�9° w a � .._ �$`zo �J 58Tki r, �i t�8 s�" � � . w t o 4J Z � N • ' ' ' T�� ' w�5 ir05 � z 4,� 60� {�� 17 �� 6Q P 7 :��%.� . � . �.. s� ; �; t � � : B � 9' � : /c . _, .� , �r � �j _ : /� � . �J ,�: �. ,4... ► 9b� J � _ �: , 39�� 1 t � 5�¢5� � i `� � 54� � r �� i 1 ,,. � ZS�t 3 ;,,� 59 7 � ��E 9 r� ' , �� :- o v~i �91. 4 i :: AVENUE N.E. � lia :s t e�o � � �„ � � :satn - si � �; U�. N S8i7 - p -- � � 584S � 4 � ' � N 5b'/F 5��0 se�Y 6. � � 5a 8� ' O S �� a 2 j9 � •59i! Saz� ' 2' i � '''�! 58a� � 2 Safs � ; v , - � T 5�a7 � �,y -5fl� {4 � ;� � :58m ' �,..,,� AVENUE j i�1•E•�„ ' �... ,,. � ,.. . .�. `3�� i �7�8 ° ;, ; s4,o � . , , z R _ 3 b Li _ 3 r r: � ti. f' ,,.. ,. _ .,. ✓. .. �P�� - � �-4� � i , -- �_.!"�_�. , ��,,`�, <' 18 SP �84-06 Edward Andrajack ` ` ` � � "''- � !- �g �}� r E:�• - �• � FOr EDWRRD AN�RAJAGK SR. � I ' . I OTS � � �. �_;=v, �� '� ' HYDE PARK ,�� .�v,.i.r �_.-..^� . .�'�LS�. . , `.��.. � . i� �� j �../ I . i 1 i !�� , .... . �.n�. � , --� . .: t - � � -'�O.T �. a �� 0 � 'tioYE �- _ O � � � 1 �-- — — — -- — ,� �- — -� 4, �} 3 , ae , . . - j1 , .. '� ; ,� � . _ , � . � �Gf�RqGE .�� ' l�� 'm , N r� i t' . .� � � ~�— _- ��'� _. : " •' -i30.48 . t � 4� • � - � �.,. ,- , , 1 \ C' J J � - C m N' *� ��wr+Y � • : ��r2 � . --•�- — — —'� _ _ . _ . .,,�. . , . _._ _ . .---,. - �e: _ _ _ ,. . . _ . , � .� __ , _�. . . � _ , _ _ . _. _ .. .,.- - _. _ . . . _. ,_ ;.,., - . _ ._,�_ .. _.. _.�, � .-c <�c��:. - i ( � �, : �, : - _ � ...i - _ _ . � - ' _ ^� �:ncs^!� 5�369 �672! 42`-2'g, {� s°��'I��j ' l � _ � � . . � *., ��_�?r�,3 ;C4�v1�� i�. - - ['.s-1,t.-►'�S.i: " ✓ , �a��l� � . . - . - • . L � �_. . .. _ . . � .. . . _ . . . _ _ �� PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNINr, COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Cortenission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, May 9, 1984 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 P.M, for the purpose of: Consideration of a Rezoning Request, ZOA #84-02, by Robert D. DeGardner, to Rezone from R-1 (one family dwellings) to R-3 (general multiple dwellings) that part of Lots 3 and 21, not taken for highway purpose, and all of Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14> 15, 16, 17> 18 19 and 20, Block 20, Fridley Park; and that part of Lots 3 and 24, not taken for highway purposes, and all of Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23, Block 19, Fridley Park, to allow the development of a 13 four ur�it condominium complex, located in the South Half of 15, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. Generally located between Ashton Avenue and East River Road on 61 and 61 1/2 Way N.E. Any and al1 persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. UIRGINIA SCHNABEL CHAIRWOMAN PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: April 25, 1984 May 2, 1984 19 � MAILING LIST P.S. N84-02 Loft Homes of Fridley and ZDA N84-02, by Robert DeGardner Robert De Gardner 1438 North Danuble Road N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. � Mrs_ Kenneth Elven 20 62 1/2 Way N.E. fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. Richard Stoltman 30 62 1J2 Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Raymond Humann 40 62 1/2 Way N.E. fridley> Mn 55432 M. A. Kloster 60 62 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. John Klingman 70 62 1!2 Way N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. Gary Gharl ie 80 62 112 Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 D. Smagatz 35 b2nd Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. 6 Mrs. I:awrence Newhorter 39 62nd Way N.E. fridley, Mn 55432 Mr, & Mrs. Abdon Jerkovich 49 62nd Way N.E. fridley> Mn 55A32 Mr. 8 Mrs. Ken�eth Frabel 60 62nd Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. Darre1 Sheldon 114 62nd Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Planning Comnission A/24I84 Mr. & Mrs. Richard Soj 6101 East River Road N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. Rodger Berkholz 6103 East River Road N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. Roger Welter 6105 East River Road N.E. fridley, Mn 55432 Jane Louis VanBergen 6110 Starlite Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth Erickson 6110 Starlite Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Dale Owens 612� Starlite Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Cheng Dick Ping 6130 Starlite Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Francis Plautz 6140 Starlite Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Richard Roback 6160 Starlite Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Walter Iskierka 6170 Starlite Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Prapas JaneJaroenthum 6180 Starlite Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Kim Mechelke 6190 Starlite Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Michael McCue 6200 Starlite Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 20 Mailing List DeGardner Page 2 Independent School District 14 6000 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. S Mrs. William Iskierka 100 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley> Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Leonard Witucki 101 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. 6 Mrs. Alden Robertson 104 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Robert Lindberg 105 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Fred Harvey 108 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Reed Scott 109 River Edge Way N.E. fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Keith Ol�on 112 River Edge Way N.E. fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Nordahl Sol i 1T3 River Edge Way N.E. FR�dley, NW 55432 Julie Zapp 185 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. 5 Mrs. James wronski 189 River Edge Way N.E.' Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Chester Wrubel 193 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Maynard Nielsnn 7144 Riverview Terrace N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 zi �� t, . � psv�a� s�F �sa� � saw�sv. r�. � STIPtN„117I1'hi5: Q �, EARI�,�il# � ` s?!�'f �U ,. � ;�:. .� • ; a ,� _ wrrwr.cv a rrr ,., > _� - :�; t� s r. a -, �'4-, e<:. ^'.. _ ......... -}�ii �`a� zz �LOA �f�Y"_s�Y 5AY i PS �� u BEAD IWE�JJ.€�B,�i� f�rlSTiY-�I�L5�1� �tt•�.w� K��eiri nv rv-� nw STREEI' 10CATION OF tADPERT1f s '� �� LE6AL DESCRIP7ION t� PRDPERTII � 8c,('�,(�� j,Q.�Q F��RY ,f�Q!/. PRESEN7 ZOlfIN6 CLASSIfICATION�fXISTIlMa USE OF PROPERTY (�4tNr ACREA6E OF PROPERT7 3�fl�P�'S DESCRI6E BRIEFLY T}� PRQPOSEO ZONING CLASSIFICATION OR TYPE OF USE AND IMPROVEI�EMT PROPOSED Te 2ddE / T�� souDiwu.✓iu,N 5 � r � �'-� lies the presenta�p ]icant previously sought to rezone.`q1at, obtafn a lot split or rariance or speci�T ase perieit on the subject site � part of it? ,^,yes_„�iw. lihat was requested and when4 �✓�� The w�derst ed understand5 thYt: (a) A list of all residents and rnmers of proper- w� gn ty wtthin 350 fieet mtsi be �ttached to this a lication (rezoning). 300 feet. (plat- ting), Must be attacf�d #o'#his �pplSiation. '�(h) This apqlication must be signed by a17 amers-of tbe proQerly, or an explanation jiven r�y tAis is not the case. (c) Responstbiti;y far aqy defect 9a tfie proceedings resuit9ng from the failure to -]ist #fie na�es and a0dresss aT �rll residents and property arenrs of pwp�rty in 9uES;�,`�►elpngs �to the �nders�+,�aRd. _ �;- , � , ,s -�_ `:� � r, , �',� , " .. ` �' �6f prt�qsed properfi,r � structare �ust be drawn and attached, showing the �. `:�drth die+ect�oA. tC. Location of ihe proposed structure on the lot. 'ip�t sf �roperty, proposed structure. and fron and side setbacks. 4. Street ''�: `it�Cat1lM and Y�e.�f a�ace�t existi�g Duildfrtgs (witfiin 350 feet). _ �.,�:- The undersi�d ii�t^e�y neciares Lfiat all the facts and respresentations stated in � t1►is appliution �re true aad corract. Di1�E '� .��. .� ��,�� S 6�UITl�tE s�i � .••�u _ �t.. _ _ � � ' I �� ,,.. ' ��.�� t{7 � '° .,d� x h 3 k�fi.'`� "` . . . . . AD�.Sg^ /�`�l Q ;i � !J�„�" �� TELI .. x' y. ... . fp,�'7� �3�3 ' ; �- j a�� a � � � � �T., ; �. � .� + ��, ' . �� . � � � �� - � .,. .�� I , � �� ' , � l ' � �� ' �� • �' .L � 1 ��1 , r • : � �� , � ' _ . � � i r �� ,I' / � " � , � r �� . . � �� -.A� Y � � � �� A{ ' � • � ' , ' � .�r ,,\�� i �. . a,• ,� k+\V1'M �� e�� , . ._ �� ..,... _._. - � . . � /ii� � .._ . ._:. .r! �1 .r ; .,,�. � � ��.�-F * �1,�� 0� •.�,,�r � ; � ,,, �� . �\, i��1;. P/Ird� �� . .::�/,v:�;i�.��? � , ;� �; r�,,;. _,� . _A - '.� I , ��/'.�.;� � ,�.��E�;� : � � ,..,...,n. � � �;�:.s,. ';+ L4�,, �'' � �� 4r1 �.R� � �4� .o, � o ` ' ' 2,� '� (,400 /1( r ' � . S�if LLl +� i l+ s �i r L �f � / b . %r � Ju ~ I c�C. � : � i �. _ y r,s !j� ��Y s SYLV � �3 � � ,+�� !� � �� f � 3rz '• � , � � � � % �� p i� jxN �:z! � � � ��o t�f � � "� � jf� � G `��qa ��O � r Gzf , �t � �� ;z. i � LZ� s „ �� 2 f,��yc � � � LL� f � � � _ i t lcii '�'r-" -'-��_ ��O o �.Ze/ �ilb0 �� , ��,�o� tl�o G� � � � - � Gi�p I / �`� , z :.� � ui �� -+�� w�• �;� ,�o Y� 7 � � rA� L�� -' �'� �' > t u� _� :�o � ,� � w , � p v� ti� . p � � 1* ,p, . . ;�,; » � , - -- --�- . , :.... PUBLIC HEARING BEfORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing af the Planning Comnission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, May 9, 1984 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 P.M, for the purpose of: Gonsideration of a Preliminary Plat, P.S. #84-03, Loft Homes of Fridley, by Robert D. DeGardner, being a replat of all that part of Lots 3 and 24 not taken for highway purposes, and all of Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23, Block 19, Fridley Park; and that part of Lots 3 and 21 not taken for highway purposes, and all of Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20, Block 20, Fridley Park, to allow the development of a condominium complex of 13 four-unit dwelllings, located in the South Half of Section 15, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota Generally located between Ashton Avenue and East River Road on 61 and 61 lj2 Way N.E. Any and e11 persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the ab�ve stated time and place. VIRGINIA SCHNABEL CHAIRWOMAN PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: APril 25, 1984 May 2, 1984 24 -.i MAILING LIST P.S. #$4-02 Loft Homes of Fridley and ZOA #84-02, by Robert DeGardner Robert De Gardner 1438 North Danuble Road N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth Elven 2� 62 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr, Richard Stoltman 30 62 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Raymond Humann 40 62 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 M. A. Kloster 60 62 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. John Klingman 70 62 lJ2 Way N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. Gary Charlie 80 62 1/2 Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 D. Smagacz 35 62nd Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Lawrence Newhorter 39 62nd Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Abdon Jerkovich 49 62nd Way N.E. Fridley> Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth Frabel 60 62nd Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. Darrel Sheldon 114 62nd Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Planning Co�nission 4l24/84 25 Mr. & Mrs. Richard Soj 6101 East River Road N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. Rodger Berkholz 6103 East River Road N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. Roger Welter 6105 East River Road N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Jane Louis VanBergen 6110 Starlite Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth Erickson 6110 Starlite Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Dale Owens 6120 Starlite Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Cheng Dick Ping 6130 Starlite Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Francis Plautz 6140 Starlite Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Richard Roback 6160 Starlite Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Walter Iskierka 6170 Starlite Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Prapas JaneJaroenthum 6180 5tarlite Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Kim Mechelke 6190 Starlite Lane N.E. fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Michael McCue 6200 Starlite Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mailing List De6ardner Page 2 Independent School District 14 60D0 West hloore Lake Orive Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. William Iskierka 100 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Leonard Witucki 101 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Alden Robertson 104 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Robert Lindberg 1D5 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Fred Harvey 10$ River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, M� 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Reed Scott 109 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 I•ir. & Mrs. Keith Ol�on 112 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Nordahl Soli 1T3 River Edge Way N.E. FRT�91ey, MN 55432 Julie Zapp 185 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. James Wronski 189 River Edge Way N.E.' Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Chester Wrubel 193 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Maynard Nielson 7144 Riverview Terrace N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 F� �' , _ r�.�.'� Y� �E a � � �u j ��= � R (, aiY o/s r�a�o{.�Yj s+a+ unavaw�rv .ara. w. . swo�sr. ww�. aas+�t rs+�� ,� � 'w �-e�i' i:atx .c ,� ..� x'�kG +c zF ¢ ` ed '�//S�f 'R+Y%a�SL 'a 3 Y .�tii �� '�` yh 49 x ; � `.a."' a u..�. r = �'�. C�� - ��G� �:.��?i �.a� � � .,---� �` �1ROINANCE i�.� 8�i�.v .. � i AC7Ip1 ZOA � �1 SAY � f�S �. �� "8's�,.tc}¢ i F Y d x. �. }� xwY � _' . �,, a�,. ,:� rt Tt � �� a �. � �°,. .. q. .+. ' + � � ��. �.l[ ' '': M, c �. . � .�' COM�IISSION: APPROYED � �DISAPPROYEO �I4�E ' �� N0. � �i� ��IICIf.: '�� 'UBLIC HEARIN6 UAiE � � 1ST :READ � 2ND READ CIiY GOUICIL: APPROYEO DISAPPlbDYED .OAT£ !10 PAf�IC FfE REQUIRED: 1HDU1T PAID STIPtR.ATIONS: NOJ a5b 7 STREET IOCATIUN OF PROPERTY E T � ' 8 e LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY uw' �� s�- �}pr aF� �,��.sDDd PRESENT ZONIN6 CLASSIFICATION EXISTIN6 USE Of PROPERTY ACREA6E OF PROPERTY DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROPOSED 20NING CLASSIFICATION OR TYPE Of USE {ViD IMPR6VEMEMT PRDPOSED Has the present applican# previously sought to rexone, plat, obtain a lot split or rariance or speciat use pe►�it on the subject site or part of it? __yes no. What Mas requested and when? The undersigned understands that: (a) A list of aii residents and owners of proper- ty within 35U feet �aust be attached to this application (rezoning). 300 feet, (plat- ting), must be aEtach�d to'this 3pplT�ation. '(b) This application awst be signed by all owners of the property, or an explanation }iven why this is �ot the case. (t) Responsibility for any defect in the proceedings resulting from the fai7ure to -]ist the names and addresss of al'1 residents and property owenrs nf prop�rty in question,.belongs to the undersigned. A gReLc� of proposed propert,y and structure must be drawn and atitached, showing the fat'iowing: 1. llorth direction. 2. Location of the proposed sttwcture on the 1ot. 3. Dioiensions of property, proposed structure, and fron and side setbacks. 4. Street nauaes. 5. Location and use of aEjacent existing buildings (withih 350 feet). The undersigned hereby declares that ail the facts aed respresentations stated in this application are true and oorr�ect. MTC �'/-Lx - iT� SttliATURE /I'iGi.TQ/ � ��w.�s...A s ,� �'3� �it�� f � � ` n� �� 0 � �� /,�3 Effective January 17, 1984 1984 POLICY STATF?�NT ON PARB FfifiS ON LAlID SIIBDI9ISION Date F�3 In determiaing fair market value of public areas for land subdivision for eash payment as required by Ordinance i633, the following values xill be used: Residential Subdivision Residential Lot Split Commercial/Industrial Subdivision or Lot Split �1,500.00 per lot E 750.00 per lot = 0.023 per s4. ft. This fee is to be paid at the time of final plat or lot split approval. The City Council may defer collection to the time a buildiag permit is requested for individual lots created by auch suDdivislon/lot split. The City retains the optlon to accept an equivalent amount in cash from the applicant for part or all of the portlon required to be dedicated. PARR FEE AGREEl�NT The undersigned understands that according to the Clty Pla•tSng Ordinance, the following public park land dedication is required to plat residential, commercial or industrial zoned property. It is further understood that the public park land dedication or cash payment equivalent is at the discretion of the City. It ia agreed that a cash payment of � will be paid according to the atrove stated policy for the following subdivision/lot aplit. �%t is agreed that the following land dedication is provided according to the above stated jpolicy for Lhe folloxing subdivision/lot aplit: Dedication: Subdiviaioo/Lot Split The undersigned further agrees to notify all future property oxners or assigns of the cash payment requirement, if it la to be colleeted at the time of issuance of a building permit. Date:_ y-��-�`f (Property Owner Signature) . s _ _ � �• v c ieue=nz i �fi+ u�� p# F�;d�� -�eGairdner _30 _ _ • — ---- ---- �-�!.Z°` .�re.�------�"_�... � � r • _1�`��W�_��_ -V _�'_''__Z.V_— :_+ial�. . . _ ` . � .�eea� 1 ' . � __� � "___ _.I__� _. — _ _ _ .t �1 I � _ 1�''� �A '.. _.� i I '� � — l:;�i �l i �j ! � , � � � ---�,-�''��;�� , , I .. , � I � � . , „! �� i U ! _ , o I ' � ;'� r' 't � �''1 i i ' ' � � ' I � ,r�f.- __''�'" �I ; ! � I I � ; � �;� r `� � �rJ, ;� i � � � _,�,, — �+ �P .i i , i . :. ( � 'N ��i � _ _ .� . � i� ..;iil j '� •I Ia� ' yti �- - _ •. ._ - - - jr� �� - j,� *; ��_ �� ' l; � ,. � _ � � — - i - �-..1y' .;' ..11�'t r t ' „ ! � ' , e 4��' -'� � � i r� "��'� , ; � t ..,.=; �> r � � � ; I . .,�� ,... ,i'� r'� ' ��t ' ��' � ( ��• ,�� ; �. Mi�� I . ,�,.� � � °- � :• .w`' � `� I + �+� � � . �. ' ^QUr. I i I ♦ ��L � l � � � t�i' ,,d , 4;� t , , ! � ! � '� „c- -- ,;� uI � i: �. ^' m, �� 1 n( •r ��,: ,s r .� < -...r .,� ; � � , " =� � � , , ,�t�—�.. _. � -� �. �� ' : ~ - t - - - - - - �- - - - - � c'—�,s---";,r...�,l,r,�: ; i - ' n /. '` ,�.. -. . -. . � �. _-_�'t��' _ _ --__'____ '_. _ � ' � . "_ •/ . 0 0 _ _ � _ _ _ ' _ ' _ _ _ _ _ . .. .. a � -- �--- , ---->_--v�Y., w..<,_ - - � - , __..-0'. . . ��.��J ��- Z�j � ` � W _. . . _ J �- _ _ _ 1 � ' �—�'- r�. _-�__ . _ . `� - - - � .. �.'=;T_ _r.�.._. ��1. , l , c � + w.- _ °"' _., �_`"_-�"�`--,� �_�. � F ,, "' ' ' � _:rT ;; s � s'` .e � , — —' I � � ' f? • -� ' 1 : .Jb i �: GI� �� . ' 0 J ea . �d � I T . r � ' �.... ;:� , � �-. < o �� _ � � '.YJ�. +��, Sr /' ?� C� . I p 1� � •.... . � r�� _. � � ; � ' S. � e' . ' : ^��i�.�l �� ..i" V� _-.i� I �. -x .� N ' n1 J ' - P P t..��: . � _'a- u,.. � �� d � . �: � 6 �� ' . ,� �n.c.l �� - .t ��., .. �i .a. "�'`-..' . ,�". � - - „r. �.r _ II � „ , r�- --- -a�- -� '-,- - -- -- . ,.,�; i i M � ^- .. '�h.. " _ �r• .j_' .t� ��" 'I_ _ _ " " d � - � _ - 3 �a��i . �� — �i �� . � n.. T..: i - iR- I _ . _ �I � . _ •„ � �� ` ^ R �:� i � I I � �� ' �� w^ �it.� \� i �'. � Yr�' . I " � - ' �r.a i ._ 1� �. .,"�,�"' M { � � T , � ,� �� . � �. � r ` � � � I 1 � I �. �.`.5�� , �Sy � �. •. '$( � w 1 I � �j � � 1 r � � < ,,,, , ..�=. . :s , . .. � + , , „ i ''' i 'F��f[��II ��" � ' �•• . .. , .� � i�j� ��1 � . � � . . ' n � i` C •�. , M � _TS- v i.-1 7� J� � . � t �- .� � i q j� t� t :! � �i :.J�f �� . . f•i �� — � �� / x' . I � �l {:pt �•ti^�"'i:it~' ~ I';' I � � �.w �1�'�� I � � , . � '�. . �e�� T"'�-v¢�� iA � � . I p.. F1'Y�- .y S( 1 . i�C� � I � � ! � ` '_ _"_ 0 �__2Bs.^J_�� `�_'__ "_ -__i 1 � ._ ' � � ________- i -�-_--- f.�� W�v ' � '- i . ._ " - . -- - - �-- - — �---i . i , - r v _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ' _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ � �. ��_'."____-- ' m.m. ,e n..e�..vo w �ee--r.+ sam-�•. �o.cac"..ee•t ►�G.�a •�tu". �SS' ��.l�t° a5°. Own�w4 S�m•�. b �L lboe� . n- ...�.. .c�a�.. On.vva S%O�.ID.t'i. l'�W" 1�� .2�3 Ct.r...-�.. � . 1�T� •.l"� 25V0`. it': �. � . . _.... . .. � i. �v u �1ic•' . 2 5'/. wGC�� . [ C'. V- 61� i it - tlm�" S.O'/ 1S�ep�'.<l'/. on_ y�[ �c�� S� a•'. c�. �� ..�:�,� '- �:_n.�.�=.�� . :' fc -Y'-�� =.,�,. � M �� !•'ti.�SYv.� . 4'�<si*:c.g...�._ ' . � �.•_w,��a. �� .. / I :f '� � � +. ,.. _, � l�1� �+ . � y \��it �t■ � .- �� . r. �" .. «.�� . .. ... .. j 2 iF��ri ;L. ��'�� . y 3$ - a q5 � n . . . : -•�w� � � ' i_ �.^M ��J . L S ' .. f Y�y� ' . . . i.+�� ... fL."�"i� N�- . f � 'r � ��i�s" :+s • wi.� '��"�'� f �. _ � .. e ' :.;° �'}'�,�a; s .; . w� .�� . x . . . e ....� � ' ' �_ y.P. .., .. . _ .. . . �. b` � . LT�±': ...d . . 1 �ir. . �� . �tI �f '� . � ��.*�1_� � 'r'.�.��b,..' . .. - F_"s +Y. = �.y, -":':..:. - ,rcz.. -u-' _ .V�y .. �. , . .�, 3"�aR4 . ,r,f MR4 A�'" � f �' Y _ � :�i,� `r ; P � -- ti �;� � - ;, �- ---- ��, _ -,:�...._. - . � �:. _ � _�-,. .. .- . . �b f"� '' �'� � . �t��X �� 1 � � ti�-� ✓ : -�? `��y�z�f .'. .. t . � .'., r�y.. �''--� . � _ � � F � '�`�. �. ,�� f .:� .�"- o ... � ' : R�>. y� � ��y�' 1 ptRECTORATE OP PUBLIC WORKS im Robinson - Plann MEMD N0. B4-25 TO iUBJECT riannin � Proposed Plat, P.S. �184-03, Fridley Loft Home , John Fiora between East River Road and Ashton on 61st and 61 1/2 Way N.E. 32 MEMORANDIJM TION The petitioner, Robert DeGard�er, has requested that the area in question be rezoned from R-1 to R-3 and proposed plat be approved. The QrojPrt consists of (13) four-plex units. These units are intended to be aondomin.ium type arrangements. The plat consists of 3.08 acres with (13j four plexes of 52 units for an overall density of 16.8 units an acre. Mr. DeGardner has indicated that this is a new concept presently very popular in California. Mr. DeGardner also has stated that he has built this style develop- ment in Coon Rapids and they have been well received. The key problem with this project is the required lot area. If the property is rezoned to R-3, as proposed, a minimum lot area of 15>D00 square feet of lot area is required for a(4) family dwelling. This proposal consists of two parcels (see dia9ram). The southerly one being 80,586 square feet with (8) 4 plex units which yields 10,073 square feet per four plex. The northerly parcel has 53,578 square feet with (5) four plex units which yields 10,715 square feet per four plex. 6oth parcels are short of the needed lot size. However, if S.F.A. (Single Family Attached) development regulations are applied "over" the proposed R-3 zoning, then 3,000 square feet per unit, or 12,0�0 square feet per four plex would be needed. If this were the case (6) four plex units would be possible on the southerly parcel and (4) four plex units could be placed on the northern parcel. Typically S.F.A. is used for non-conventional housing developments of five acres or more. However, this proposal is a new concept. In effect it is a townhouse that the�ScF.Ae1sta dardtof 3,OOOnsquareufootnof �otaarea persunithshould beels appl ied. To accomplish this recomnendation, it will be necessary to rezone to R-3 and grant a variance with the plat to allow for 3,000 square feet of lot area per unit. JLR/de _s Pl1BLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNIN6 COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a Publi,c Hearing of the Planning Cortmiission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, May 9, 1984 in the Council Chamber at 7:3Q P.M, for the purpose of: Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP �84-07, Woodcrest 6aptist Church, by David Radabaugb, Per Section 205.09.1, 3, A, of the Fridley City Code> to allow the construction of a multi-purpose gymnasium type building on Outlot 1, Holiday Hills 2nd Addition, the same being 6815 University Avenue N.E. Any and e>> persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. VIRGINIA SCHNABEL CHAIRWOMAN PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: April 25, 1984 May 2, 19$4 33 ra �_ , ' �.�C� 34 • CITY OF FRIDLBY� SUBJECT . . M„ ��,Tr �. �n. SPECIAL USE PEiUIIT fA1OLEY� MN. 6'3a3C f612J,67'�-KOO . . � ' �L � �i�ces %Y ?S /� f_ ��/./ . QI1T1 SP 3�('� P�,AjMlIN6 COPMISSION: APPROYEO �1S11PPROYED DATE ��9 � I �.� .� .��:. � . ' CITY OOI�ICII: . APPROVED DISAPPROYED DATE � STIPULATIONS: � NAME I�p00CREST BAPTIST CHURCH FEE 200.00 RECEIPT NO o�s9� STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTM 6875 INIYERSITI' AYE. N.E. LEGAL DESLRIP7ION OF;PROPERTY ��T 1 Of HOLId41' HILLS 2nd ADDITION PRESENT ZONING CLASSIfICATION R-; EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY CNURCH - Sp1001 FACILITY ACREAGE OF PROPERTI' 3.�6 DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE SPECIAL USE APPLIED FOR: CONSTR�{�jOtl OF A I�AA.,z,Y PURPOSE 6YMIASIU�1 TYPE BIIILDIN6 - Section of the Code• Sns' U9 /, 3//d-� — Has the present applicant previously sou9fit to rezone, plet, oDtnin n"lot split or variance or special use permit on the suDject site or part of it? !_�es X no. What was requested and when? � The undersigned understands that: (a) A list of a11 residents and owners of proaer- ty within 200 feet Miil be attac►ied to this application. .. - • �. jb) This application must be signed by all owners of the property, or an expianation ljiven why this is not the case. - . tistRthe�names�and addre�s ofealliresident�andiproperty�owenrs of propRrtyuin to question. belongs to the undersigned. A sketch of proposed property and structure nwst be drarm and attacned. showing tfie fotluwing: 1. North direction. 2. Location of the proposed structure on the lot. 3."' Dimensions of property. proposed structure, and fron and side setbacks. 4. Street names. 5. Location and use of adjacent existing buildings (rithin 350 feet). The undersigned hereby deClares that all e facts and respre this application are true and correct. DATE �.3 SI6NATURE � , tons state hin � h � ,o,.oA'�pu9 _ NO S- V o Cb'�✓-cl+� SY6-4r4lo News. MAILING LIST Woodcrest Baptist Church 6875 University Avenue N.E. SP #84-07 David Radabough Woodcrest Baptist Church 6875 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. C.J. Johnson 400 Rice Creek Blvd N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs, Marcel Pattock 401 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Donald Vant 406 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 JoAnne Thomas 412 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Gary Anderson 413 Ri ce Creek Bl vd. N. E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Scott Lund 418 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Charles Johanson 424 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. G. R. Maeckelbergh 425 Ri ce Creek B1 vd. N. E. �/u.fLr.-�' J'jvn � S6y3 Y Eric 0 6unlogson 430 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. Philip Eberhard 436 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Donald Gustafson 437 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Planning Co�nission 4/24/84 35 Mr. & Mrs. Myrle Rice 442 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Firs. John Haines 448 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Joseph Ulvin 449 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. DuWayne Bakke 454 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55A32 Mr. & t4rs. Arden Foss 461 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. C. J. Mickelson 4�J3 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. -L.a.L-j, rw�.. : i-v3 •- Mr. Joe Garthofner 485 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Quentin Freeberg 301 Rice Creek Terrace N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 � SP �84-07 kloodcrest Baptist Church 1 � . • � - .NMi_ �.t.c. !tf_!� -•.� i•+� M by 1 n wr��, n.�. � .. . , �+: ' � I �� ' . �. "s. . _ « �. f • II00 5' �.�•r '' 3 �'••: • • � � 10] �57 i S70 .� i . � �t� � ' ' � ` - '"n , t.� � i.} � • „"' ' i � , �OG � 1112 05�2 f � � `�4 ��2 i i� : 3'!T 4 SSS t:. � sC . s `� - s 2I � ` ,S , , . Y ,. 3 � , � , � _t.y, 5 �r '� Y�r ' ; .!e W s,s s � ! .� W A • +� �, a � �..xs- j - � , z ' 4 •� � . .d y„ . � � � .. � ^ , '' � � , 4„I�° I ; �2C V : 9 � t � ° � �:, ,s° ; 2 «.; Zq� � I ' : s'- Q 5 �y � ' , � .1 � y i N ♦ ��` ' �. � , * � �. ,540 � 2 rl�� ' �'� v� ,'• 3i : ,. W . � .p�'� _,Zr � �,� • Q•6 W - 3 � --�.�, . : - , s3o 1. o ° ; �e�i . . � . �� .�.- � � �• � - ;A"� , , y;.' � ' • ` �412i W .� �' �?`9 �, �r�,. s.. , O g (,� e 6 o C,\7 . ;% .t � :,.1 ': - e� � ;� � °p � �/ .�.t. ' � � 1 � 1 I i ,�\ ,\� d. ' � � I � � . ; ` •" . . Y I �� ; y �.�� . �j I �I � �� r _ tx,ri�.r ' .. S� - i i ` 1 "�Mr A ' I �` ' ~ ''� /O � 'f% � q • •� '' � , , . � �° s`Sa?9 ��, •; •s. ,�n... .:; , � . ` L I51 `t „ �. � ; : .. . � 2 1; � � .` ��6 : •"` �S . � �. ;'-a99. � - � � i �� s ,.�' ... � , e . w �� " 28� ; t ., . 30/ ~: a . . yt• '%r: �� /� ` � T ., ""i'-Ri.s�. r•'� � 0' ¢� �'''.�,: r�r �� "ir;�i ^:..,� �2 •�. '�/3 w ti+480+ •c ,r .r � � � � s "t,,,• *; '� w� � 36 * a ti �M _.\ 1, \1 �� n' � r•\ Y��'�5 �(�� •� ,.., � V , �: 4 ) �� _ 4 .�� Y +�;" , -- N � �: � � 47p" �;�� .,,, � � ,. � i . '� 9 i9 , � r+�•• .� a �'� r � ► .'�l�. « ", � � �s � �„� 3 \�a . � !2 ! = 48 �,. �i� 9 9 c�n � , 3�2 � \� iS� '� g .�� ' � j1 { ( , ,� . �� . . ;� I�•r . ps �Ir � I i ... �i : � ��. � r �il� � : '�fil `1!� bi00 �G{I 1 �� . i7z o,` , 36�5 �`� �~� �2� 7 �� TO �. �� 3,j �• }`"' fssN : � ' i Eo ,,,, � � '�' , q � '�s„ '? ,{\ `i�' ,;, � f L7,�0 •-�' l5 c f., „ �l ..� � '-� • : � , � � ..., �'��t'�" ` 54 �� ' b�� Z� t l�9 �0 454 "�S� , G: � �0 4 J �� Nr -~ - 35 � , rs � � 5 • ; ` 4og 419 t99 � i != 6 Z � � �` ' � �Z S �. I i 6720 �� y6• • . 1.3A �� ...-, o �.y �/ i i. � �� L� _ � `= 3 '.,•-� Z bT�p, = GT�� . 41 ��n e . .. �.• ' . , � � s: Z �I . . ,\s: . %• ' ` , _ e � g , 5 4 3 Z . � ��SR9d �; � 3318 J � . 7� 391 4�! 4� �4�5 { � ,a;,45� �6t �7� A61�4 'C�` � i I �' ' �� ,. , .,o . so .. .. ., � p• • i• �; 1 � '•. 67 AVE. N.E. . �=O =�C c /� sJ ' / fi sf vl +! /� 2� �at Q �bo 370 390 !390 ,�ro y��iLlo �/v�' S/sn S�6o y7o yeo � � ��o � �n i � .. .. .! � . .I - � !a � s � ia a� /,� � iz � i.a � �4' F�;�� ., ,: '.��. `,�+A �._ . . '' lY' i..•�M� i ,( :�� Y� �. � +:!� ^� �fi K ' `Y� �� t � �' • �' ��cl.. t �, " .�, � v. �,� �.. . . i� 3' ..��. -�' � -,fA�� 'r. `��7.:- - , r�� :s f '„ ,.�. �;- . �" r L , r - � �� . xp ' tYz �.� � �... ^y' y "E y _ ��. . �� ..�� '��`� e i, ^i . � `r '� � �,,,.. �1It �� r. � "' � '� .s. 4 ,�� •��s' � `L, ,~ - � � }- r' ' ./ [!'�' • �. � s i 'f�L�t .tYs ,� ' i� ' �, �� +r - • [ �, _ 1i . r_�{ • T.» �� .:��i ,f ♦ �.i a�, ��yl�/�. � � 1< A� . • � S ♦ y � � .� �'' 't �.� iF..- �. ' .1' � ' + y. � N r1� '�� ,.� ,�=� �., # ' `: _: � . ' � �� 1� r � ' at . i - , � ; F.-� .. j �� ,: ` � , � � • :, r , ' {'� ' : � • � • .�� i � .�,r� Y17 '.� , . . � �i' � � �'f '� � �4 +7 _ � ` `w '� !� . 't � - y,s, i .i� .r�is • •'� �. • ,,�'r� ' w �,g? � � � . + y� . �,� ,,.. 1 � �. � � o � p�' 1'�� ,,,' " � f� !i � �� r `.., � 1 '�. � ��` � � � � � � - ` �� j .. � t �.- :� � �t � PR � ! � � ��. ',. �C : '' � �pt .. �,R, : r "��. � z�.Y. } � ,.. DL� r '�� ;,' ` ' i r "' �1 � 'j. ` ;t�.? . L . � f • � x_�-t - �YAt ��k� � � �1 �. . - . � L A rt / �• :w f j � �€�'" ,,�` � � L` w ' -t � � �:"�' - � � � � � ./'' r , � , T ° •-�� = F _�' , 1 t 9h., � � I r ��`• ,, �� ` �J - � q#. - � . �� . �`�r �; • �.:: . �; � � Y,_.� �.� � � � � �`,.� . €� -��`• , �4 — Y � . 1� -' - � � • : � s # ` . .� �.' ¢r' " �r t • � ' �i %� ` . ��,�'� , � 1 � ��r !�� '�r� �` . � � �� ' �'.�. � w .7� _ ' .. . ...r� . � � �. . i y ..- y r-: ^ � _ �a:�-- �'' � ; - ' ��+ - � • !} " : �y, �,� 'K. .�� 'Iti �� i r� f' �` Y'��-- . _ �' b 1 � . �� r ` .. ..' _ - . s a I � v .� - y �r � f _ '� _ ,j ','�� F� ..t.t ' �#. T�. = � ` � yI ` � . ,� !� � �J��' r� s` :7j , •¢ a `� : *` � t �I . aN x. ' � �_ , / �• ~� Y r � � � ..ffi»a.` "�'.-y �7�� < � �� .� .Y K`. . � . . . _'T� ♦ � ;�� i- "�: 3 .�i _ � �r:� . y i-. .. � �4 :; PR IOR :L. 833 / % -x::. * . - ' �� p.5: �8�-071 Woodcrest Baptisi Church 38 ��.t �� 1 n � .G b[ h N� , + �tw 4.L 4. � (""' ��<< ` � ,�: -.:.• :�::••:: .:-i.� �:..�.� .� �.��'�, � ` - {� � d �� , � , � I , � /' �r '� c� -�:� R _• ,� _; �� ...,..r+ a '. .� �. .�s-, i � � 010 `- � u �• _ Y�W � �I Q N � 1 F < a � P�ke ..-' � i LekrC � ' li � II - E-=�-11_____.:.i '1� ,,, .. LOCATION MAP LEGEND l_— y� �_ �' EXISTING GONTOUR ��yb �� PROPOSED CONTOUR ORAINAGE ARROW ,,,�,� ,�...� �„�� pRAINAGE BOUNDARY :,; .,-� .� �1 C ~ = w < y w ' ( C M � �1 � _ � ' � I I c u O ' I I , 1 . r i I I � �I SP #84-07 Woodcrest Baptist � I � � 'ii I :I � � i � I ' � � i � � 1 i i h 13� �. �� :i� " ' i ;; i �^j I 1 '� � I I � ' I C i �I� � ' " I, � �� ; ! t , :;, I � ;F � � i �' 1 � � � .�i �i��, � I �� I / v r, �� ` h� � � �-• - - \ -_ �9TX_ AYE_ __��__ —�� . . . � .�` / ,� �` � � � �i . i \ F. � �� . 'i \ ,�v�l i \ g i 1 � ;�' : . l��' - � �`/ �'��. •``\ � � r:, ', �— ;l _;/ , ��, • Y �', � / r ,`� 4 � �R , ',L�.y � ; � �' ' / � �. 17t � J e :, � - ' � � � � . - � -s—'� R � / . � -� r � -r---=� ''----! .z ', ^� Y_l�-..� \� �� // r �, ^"'-1--..._ - �1- .; r - ;� � � � - _ _U � � yb � � �- � ^I n, — l� _� i-= _ '_ U;_ i I �� : �-� — —1, r� �� - �, _�± � �� - � � � . -t � � � � --�- ,� � -�- f '� ` _ .. �I � ` � �� ` � ---� ,, J ( ��D � � � � ,� fg ,^ `I11�',�� ` . � ', --i� C �;j �--+�y,_:. a �, _ Jr.� � -.. I � i- ' \'\• __ �� a I /. �� t i �r J i I ; � i �� I � � %' �' , �� a . __ ^ ,� :_� r �,'� ', -� � � � /.'� \�' ,� --_ : � ' , � , �� . � ,�,� _ _ t- �� ' _ �-- i /,�.,-` -�_ _ `\ .; ,. _•_ _ -` \ ` ' - ,' ._ , ' _ ,� , � �\� ;: q�\ � . ; , . 1 \ ,�, � � f _ ' �'��_� ��; � ,�� _ � �-- �� , ', : ' — `�.cC9c�`F,�` �� ` \ _ • �° , , � s , : �,�,, �_ .. \ . o �r M t . ► � � \ D r ^ ` \ T � � � � e � SUBURBAN ENGINEERING, INC. North Offtce - 571�6066 South Office • 890�6530 6875 Hwy. 65 N.E. 12350 River Ridge Blvd. P. O. Box 32308 Minneapolis, MN 55432 Burnsville, MN 55337 ITa �� N' t—�id / v WE ARE SENDING YOU L Attached ❑ Under separete cover ��Q �� QQ��Q� 40 the following items: ❑ Shop drowings �rints CJ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications Q�CoRY of letter p Change order ❑ THESE ARE TRANSMIT7EQ as checked below: B�For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ for your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections �or review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 G Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit_copies for distribution ❑ Retum wrrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US � �u �, COPY TO (��,j%/ L—.,��✓� SIGNED: �� / �O mm�r�l �r, aw � o:�n H�ntlowres an �at w nefM. kinMl notM w�t w�c�. . 1. ,��. r ` � � �. pTY OR FA/DLtY. M�7 Y�MVQAiRY /Mt� Nf. •auxsr. ww. sa�se �s+�! ss�.a�so �y� 11,At0iING WIMISSIOH: �11r COUqCIL: MRK fEE REQUIRED: STIVIMTIONS: ...�..�.. StlH.IECT WT SPLIT �/G E CREEK %ZO- LS / g�-O `� MTE: 7 '�P o �rvaorEC _ nisnPPkoreo,._ a►� .�/� �,o MpROYED DISAPPROYED MTE � �T PAID 41 �/'��, � �rNOy /.��i�i4m FEE�(oU � RECEIPT N0�[� 0 v PROPERTY OMNER(5) S%J�1 F TELEPHONE NO,S7 '9.5�2 TELEPHONE NO AD�RESS(ES)_ . PROPERTY LOCATION ON STREET lE6al DESCRIPTION OF PROPERT1f Go / b ��/� 2 S�G�/NG I�A� L�y TOTAL AREA OF PROPERTY � I X/ 2� ,� PRESENT ZONING�-� REASON FOR L07 SPLIT C t� r�, n c �E�/E t aip /�'/ En/�T '�'I l �% 9-�.,� �C � zs — The unQersigned'hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are t►�ue and wrrect. DA1i: �- I�-� _ - 110TiCE: !1 sketch of the property and the proposed lot split rith any existin9 struc- tures sho`+n should acco�pany this application. ' .(See revei�se side tor �dditional inatructions) 1981 POLICY STATEMENT ON PARl: FEES ON LAND SUBDIYISION In determining fair market value of public cash payment, as required by Ordinance 633, Residential subdivision Residential lot split Commercial/Industrial subdivision or lot Date /�-r�-�-� '/,,/�ry areas for land subdivision for the following values will be used: �� S ou. ✓ � ¢�;66�00 per lot 7So.ad b -b88:60 per tot 0 0 �-3 spl its � --4.&7-r�er sq. ft. This fee is to be paid at the time of final plat or iot split approval. The City Council may defer collection to the time a building permit is requested for individual lots created by such subdivision/lpt split. The City retains the option to accept an equivalent amount in cash from the applicant for part or all of the portion re4uired to be dedicated. PARK FEE AGREEMENT The undersigned understands that according to the City Plattirg Ordinance, the following public park land dedication is required to plat r�sidential, commercial or industriel zoned property. It is further understood that the public park land dedication or cash payment equivalent is at the discretion of the City. It is agreed that a cash payment of � will be paid accordi�g to the above stated poiicy for the following s� u6�ivision/lot split. It is agreed that the following land dedication is provided according to the above stated policy for the following subdivision/lot split: Dedication: Subdivision/lot split: The undersiqned further agrees to notify all future property owners or assigns of the cash payment requirement, if it is to be collected at the time of building p2rmit. DATE L-I - I �� '`'I OC34�',!l OG7A 42 � � � U L� -- =�;---- - --. .__ _-rt.�1�-�4� � �,-aanr - --Mf�SS! t�Pl ST: — - �s .. `c�� b2.S�� "f! .M a! i 4l .tf �� w. ..r , o ` !!s/ � �� /100 /4z8 lf<L rlis J�8 t � +�v� g; �vo�,. . �� /�. ` �� lsfo)' (JCO) (2�) (LOO) i (�s.c: �Y�G i 64 t�" � � . ((d�' �' . � (►1W i-- w /3 s/ � 7 ,j � :S - � d�� ~`iva � j tis'a�i > . ►. I , it 1 i � i4� � Gs �o � bfti "'u' � � ;cc.' ' 11 1 ! � _.oac --1 �' - r��,,db �p — _ � ��, ��,�o .� - �, �� :.� � _��_ � � �� c42.o �,s� �svo h � � "6tii /9 ,'s�o) ! (sao) '� (aoo� � (szo) ; �+: � �so ; %o) � a b �� , Ga o L � . y_`�� 5.�!�� `/7 j � .�� I �/ � �� I � , � � � �. .. ` i�l � �7,� � I G��f .� G4T0 i�a� ; � I �4 89 .� , i r � . � � � � � � �" � � • � 13�3 i/ 38.5' It•� � Y! ��s! � r�87 � .1[ bfa� - 64 0 [ �' ,. :, , r y d �, •r ,; , � " TH av�. N � % � G3Bi ' �`p � = a f � �'+ � � if ,l! ' •l + - � ��f �� 3; �. �� G31 j�,� 137 z/ 3�t �� o �♦Z� r�t 4so + a ' • � : `° ►�1 3Si, (x+►' (� I (�wr! � C� '�Bd 1�01 , � � y � (r �i � � �l � �� 4- ` � ♦ � ` G3�s.�4''•I - � ; �� 9 7 �� g "'= E"` • �,+ ��adi. :; 3�t• � G'�'� 1 is�i , �. o� � ,�, - �� -., ��w � �', � �� ,• � � , � . �rz, � �s~�„ �is , . _ , ' � , L . I/ ��9' _� _ M......, . . . � . ! , ",r � .r �.. - �. A ,. _ •------ �" � 1�20 /�� t ;L31S uivo/ ' %sty G,sa' nooi (.at vo : � /J�'../6oJ) � or � C41o/ "'' .:rs' ; s l� i � : � I . ^ a.,.<,! � , onf �f ' / /✓ : ,.f'� ir i � � . ° ��.,r.r� � �� , .. • � i t<.�..w �, * ,. _ .. i � ', . , ♦ M I� 1315 .'/�c ' 14L0 1l29 # h. �.125 14M I �*Lf ! q q/ ; S0� �S�i rS1i4„ ��z u . ,� . .. , r -� -; f�ICE CREEK ROAD �.N- __ __ -`. �<CA'S�'i41a�1 �� t�i �:.w . � � �� o o � ,. . , � �+30 ' (�2'/! � 1620 is ao� � _ / S ` ,'' � : ^ LZB3 �� i �� i370 � �'f L O � " erer _ t' �; f (� �'='''�( � � € �' 't' � ' 1 6293 1 ' ' u_ ' 10� a (.��w�7 '� ,Mi ? �o/ _i (fr.s+.� /'�iRtl W 1 � i I `n� ... � ic 1 !�r r,....itw��, � �. � �.,. ,,,. _ ' ,� ' t6 1'i , . ., �c�1 * +�� ct�r � :..,.r, z ,�,. _ ' , _ j � G275 Gj,47 . +. ,r . `�4f� _. , , � �� ; s J J f,.� �.�:...�,t�1+.i�s� � n�c%,a'/ x..- ' t:: �r q �� r�tf : r j� � �__ s.,_,_."� . —" --=�-. •� ,,;. �� ORIVE b� , .. • � i��, �i,va, � �,�t�' 6 5-t bzs4 �..- : woaovo[ ct -, � 19 sM,"- � � � , ' . .' � � t+� r G24o � a�s� � �z W �: � `217 f�=` --- -— 1KS`y lA � i K vi xo �`�7 '� 20 •�' �B. ` � � I i 36 Y ��13 �r�r Q �is$ �, i 7 �1r�� l��a � C � _. {,�aS " .,: � NEATHE1l " �� R, brtr �°° Y i � ��o.N �. �if� t �A ��r+ a . �. . i..e 'd. .. Giet= �:' W ";i1t. .. -_- s�l� -, �� 7' . , -t . ._ _ ,., s- N. -. . - , �� .. , � ��' � � Y �- �:� r :� � _ -s.�c'� .. . �: :_ �:�_-�" f L S. #84-04, Cynthia Braam 44 �U�UR�AN ��NniMa�w�MO -- ` �'� rM - � � . . . .... Mortgage Loan � 1 -< � _ �� <�; 3 ' ;! r� P -� 8 l Y :. r� __"__�_ -' I 4..,:0�!,. :,�eow � r: r..�.: ,��,,, i.,. : � - .��..� .. . ..._��bL137 „_` -- .. r . - -- - --- .-c-_._x_ ��r�. ,r Ju� wA66�a , . .. . . . . mr • J �'i:.ro. � I` Bsn,. .. �rr y �:,L) ' �� 1 � ' /', it "� � � . -.;�=t: - ..: �..i. �urvey avr —•— - - _` � �' �j.;rft ::,'�l. :i iGi a . a✓�-^ - f � � N � - � l r,-;�:' �'7vt,-�z=�.. t ' - - -- --1 � -- t .'_ � , , 1 aJ� . .{, ,; ,� � � � � O � �E�� '� �;.ar � .`�` A/ :��. i �.� ..T-��•�:� .+�..s----�+ � � A �°4 uP',�!nE�`". C�-_-� S', �O ��, r� � . . � � zs.q. u'� r �ss:._ _..,: .. _ ..,.. :n4i Q': _ �7 4 I 1—r � , .. ' � .? o� .'�a:Y -�.•,; y %� a 1 �, - __ �25. o � �^ '�_=� ,�-� � ,C, Lo-r �, F3t�oc k 2 S��E;=J�-� UI��t�C�Y � �r�ckLt �,r,b��i t h : �J �� i ,ca � l' Sc` , i2G� j� ihlv n a �.u� vnd <one<� �spre+en�o��on of a wr.ey ol rh� bo�nda•!et o! �he lond abe+• d��•�had a�d d rhe bml�en o/ oll bulld�ng�� d anr� rM1�.sen, ond ell .is�bl• •nvooahm�nn� il eny� Irom er on w�J land TAn w.v�r u made onlr m aonn��on wi�h o morrgaqe lacn no.� beinp plaeed on 1h� f.op�rrr end no 11ab46rr �� o+��m�d eacepl �o �he heida of sush me.�poye o. any een�. .�rereN arqwr�d b�,he .eoaon ol seth mor�po9�. Ir n underftoed ond agn�a 7n menumenf� �a�� bHn pfyoed io� �A� pe.poij N�f�obli�hiny JN !•^�s ar bw�.darr <erner�. DoNd �his C�_day ol L j. A.O. f9�J � fUS1jR�A [N IMEERtlIf:, INC. FMin�s%� ' i /�� S�rwyan L''� �`,; r S . `''<-= � ---�—�` � � _' I DIAEGTORATE PUBLIC WORKS iATE UBJECT � Y John G. Flcra City Manager Memorandum J.F.-233 (Sale of Public Properties Procedure) MEMOAANDUM ACTIONIINF Property should not be disposed of until the plan of disposal has been reviewed by the Planning Commission and found to be tonsistent with the City'S Comprehensive Plan. This requirement may be waived if the City Council finds by a Lwo-thirds vote th at the proposed disposal has no relationship to the Lomprehensive Plan, M50. Section 462.356 Subd. 2. Legals of Public ProRerties That Could be Sold by the Ci� 1. Lot 14, Block 1, Blomberg Estates 2. Lot 15. Block 1, 8lomberg Estates 3. Lot 16, Block l, Blomberg Estates 4. The West 80 feet of the South 150 feet of Lot 6> Auditor's Subdivision No. 129 5. Lot 1. Block 7, Edgewater Gardens 6. Lot 2, Block 7, Edgewater Gardens 7. Lot 3, Block 7, Edgewater fardens 8. Lot 11> Block 20, Fridley Park 1- 3: 7orrens Properties acquired by Warranty Deed - Cert�ficate of Titles 50808, 50809, and 50810 Properties received in lieu of Park Fee or Park Dedication for Blomberg Estates Plat 4: Abstract property of partial acquisition by probate deed (Flanery Park) 5-7: Abstract property obtained by State Deed (Tax Forfeit) B: Abstract poperty obtained by Quit Claim Deed. Attached you will find 3 maps showing the locations of the above referenced properties. Memo No. 84-59 April 30, 1984 Page 2 City Manager Memorandum J.F.-233 (Sale of Public Properties Procedure) In disposing of the property, the City should comply with the Uniform Municipal Contracting 1aw. Consequently, the property should not be sold through private negotiations. The properties must be sold at a reasonable price. The Council should determine, on a lot Dy 1ot basis, what a reasonable selling price is for ea�h buildable parcel. A"package deal(s} could be an option in the disposal method. The following is a suggested procedure for the disposal of the lots and buildable parcels. The title of each parcel should be reviewed by the Lity Attorney prior to disposal as there will be some restrictions on where the proceeds can be used. l. Establish guidelines consistent with Chapter 12 of the Lity Charter, Section 12.06. 2. Submit notice for general distribution of the City's intent to sell these properties. The notice should state the method of sale (i.e. public auction, sealed bids, etc.) 3. The City Council should establish minimum setling prices of individual parcels and methods of disposal by appointing: 4 A. L'�� Council members to affix values and formulate plans for disposal, or City Assessor to affix minimum values and suggest alternative methods of disposal, or C. Independent Appraiser(s) or Real Estate Company(s) to submit methods and minimum values. Each negotiated sale and method(s) of sale will be subject to City Council approval. CVM/de v�• �� , ,.,,d.� ` - . � ' � �' h _. � n . rl . " �.� � • Q, ` -.� i�✓. w , . l / EC. I2, T. 30, R. 24 irr oF FRiocEr �o i�_ - •;MEADOWMOOR:,a A=. �- ... � ...� ' i= , ', � �'.1 y 7�Y""'�'"�.r�f.-+.-_� ��:..��. '�n�l 1• ;ON Z•�1':': Ix1�kw°,si.sintiye-.° i� r e ri � tit ft"'�.oi � - . ..r.. . � J`, �. . �. i � .r! F , o�rv[ i� � . •+ � _ ♦- _.:- • �,,. _ '. � � • � �� . � . E . , : , t ,� , . : er�RRAC� . � s ! • , ,� . �.� � . - �a•-�J' �'-px,. .. ,. �.. : -� ..... �, ;� •• n : • � �! a 7 :: ! . .0 Y '� � � • S'��. : Ps y r. �. : , t „C. ��_ _., . ..�p►' ,a.. �y� ,f . , t s e .� �IENT _. i' . r H' �t1 '� z 3 i�r • ° �_� �. . '�' .e. ` ' �:,, .- ..�.s,ns .�, i ,•,. ..• r �� i ��, e -�,. • � . iy. � �.fV � ' � . .�1'�� i r1 ,• i. _ . -..rs r« '*- wt«uE •:.. «.c • � I � • 3 ♦ ) I � • i I / . /.� �l ne s• co.r.�..row c•.ecao� a r.m' u�tu iw r.rr wcv. cou.m arcrs u�tn��c : �rt . a. yo... ry/y [I�r��L �S �O Y USlD Wi r Ip ��pfw:f NMOSi1 AnM �w� (q� it 6 �q' �tSqMS�Itf /�f ��n N �CCUYCHS MI(�w Cd(f4v1�D 539l2 ...... . _ ^_._... `� /IKE SPRIN� � .«o,... ,R „ �� r-----T ^ -� - \ - �!Cwe�c+� ��w[ -... ..�,.�� ;��M��;. �}F� � � I .i� I „ iVE�Ei °i E C � %,, .f! i I `i j � 4 � s i �2 � ,�.4a7NiRx�v I ° ,�vAL�E.�; ,� . � , � ' • � Y 'ai � a' � I � `^„ �iy_ ��4 . •' . . � �., i i � � ' ' :f. � . f �� I�: �V�I�J.' .: s�• � '�� =... y ..� � IN�: ! i• r� - Q � � ^ � • ; �,.� ��00� � �. 1 �y !�I .a. �'� �{~ �a_ /� 2 1Wt i� . t F . — _ _ _ _ _ Z! .Y 1 f�''� `::....�. � 1f 1Y'� � i. � � • I } r t . � ' � ` ' . � .Y � �I� i:�a� JL � :��. �\ f �w.a �Mt �",� ` Yr V � _� � �'- _ ` - � � � , � . . - �O ��J'Op. � �.. . � ��.r.. .. P ;�� ; ' � _ : - t`,�; .s.. �-- - - �� r" - . _ �, - . . � :'�". rG[ - • w [ � � _ ,t � �.� 5, ,...... � ^ UOITOR'S �' " l; �F�ti' i, �.. tAE"� � �� n... .� w � i ....� �[ � —' �i 9 ..:.^ , �., ..... r�( � .��." ,...a.ti- , ..� $ '- r ,.� �i 7 ; /....►�i Y �� -i .a ~��i ♦ � ' � r ' .++�y`� � .��p� >- _ �'�is_ .r ,. _: ? � i ... ��.--- !" .;_ .:' �.' ' '�---' :i1RESIDE 0111YE �-Y 10 � � 6 ; I � � J �� . � j � � - � � '��' � Q�u � � ��'! Ln � , i5 � �9�• � : \ �� y � � � .r.-F.,..e .: �r,.;� �. . ,� UNDf I I t� QD - � , �,. . � • � �: 4 , �� s� •� . ;i .�, � "'t +1 5,.. � � I � •�� i : OM � �6L �,iT11[ET y. �� . -.: -.'N.�--t.. r. -�— •= w�cNUr. - ' �—," �,�• �* . , "- ,�, � : w NA4 , � Y i r4liiON ^ ��sueav�51oN ; � � Jt�►i,... ... � � �: ,o.� 7 ` : 22� 2i' 2i: 2B ''= � f�' • s p• .. aUD• --• "-� 1 , '' • ;r:- : 35 , i "u�v .s.. � ..., � _..; , , � 7i ��p =._ ; t[� � i t�� ' ' � ' e - � � E', : � � Y,+_ .1 =,� -T.: � � aa � ' 6' SUBD � ��'r��i� � '- _ �:'— "� `'�M '��ATFS i� �ij I� a 9 � • • � .+ . . r�.�; :. � - 23 25 { 27 29 .-. M„y� ; T �� • ,.. _,�.�+ f,� � f' .�.� �2p � `, �" ,...�ND. Q9 i � t, �•+,l �� a:..: r .'r ►� �' �NO.I08 I � " ` � � �:�li �CW/MTTlT�Tf NDNeWW1rM9.• --�• _ .i3AO -1YE.-.M.{"—_— —_ �_ ��— 3.� '- r�n�o++r� xc �i uc ,i �� 13 IQ/Ik0 W.�MOEffON - ar� [pM�r WlvfrO� _!, rou eO�e �or. � •. �. . ' 2 SEC. /5, T. 30. R. 24 C/TY OF FR/DLEY �9/ ..�, ...,�... ......., s -- �,. • � dM'S .� TNlRO � �DO/TIDM j ��. �`-�'r� .�' - ' '�c� `'� . / l�ilTM w'/ • - _ � tt' _ �'. ' � � ' •• ' • ,�� ' � .,' . ir PZ 2 T •�'�: ` � z ' .. � ' ,i ..`•-�R�. :,~� �:StM! � O� •� REY. p� `.__ro ��E ; �1� ..i'� _. �. �, t b - ,. y_ �LlG, li.;.,.d TNY ` � l � :: S�o Fa, { t � : k"' i��5 � : ' �uor sus • � ��; . , f �w�.. L ` .Y..: s � , �� i w �yT�O .w� E:. s�rn rrr .r N0. 23 ' � 4 E � . � • . ' . . 57YIN'S S[LLMD �IDO � 3 � �4 ''�. � �� , � « . . � y • �.' � 1 .r `�w~ .I:•~ ' ' l y � � . / 'y ..I.• 1 iy' \•; •. . _ ' " -r� ,•., _• i .R1 ' V � • t '' . •` I ; \` • t • . j7 I'' � ' G�. � � •t ti., ,• y, ' � � .f I V b r � • �• � yo •r � ' �� .� / , �Y • l�r� . • �... .. � � � ��, f ,�(r.� ,j� . , j .P C.� � � \ ^ W rV f v � � :�+1 . a!4� I.�•Y•' ! �' / , ?� y�I �' � ' . r t � � C i v , •e.�. S. .' � ^ �; .'� � ��tr* �'" ��• s g � =r � 6 ;. � r�. - .� € I <. :e • - - -_-- h� �, ��' • �I J � • !�. /'. � • �' � i � , � ', ;/ • ,'` ' 1 .� � : �. ` 1 � . � -�/J. - _Ot. �•' y. ,� .� , e � � .•, • 1+ pZp ' � � ' : "�.4�Ew .,�, �� , , G .N. , —PL d �� ' f,. ��'� ��.L��%G"/" .a �j.� � � 'r `' " . ��`• �� ' �•� r +' • `, r� ♦ _� � � I��r — ,�- ��9 �� • -:E '�`��.��Y' ,'.s.' = '� _ .nb -=1 -��.\ ° r FR) . � "'� . . ��l�P; . . . ,f.. .+` °► • i J D "'i ,N''� ' . a • �~ ` , • J• 'S i�.l �`� %t - � e 1� ,.. '� s, , � K . • ' • � _ . �0 � r,t�, ..� .:. �: � , � �T � � �. N � ��o R' • F`'� . ✓Z �y • ; � � it .� a� �p. �r�,� � •, •. �''; � -° ' ' �tN . i 9 ..' 7r`' • i . • b .. j � �'��* �� , .. . k ' � :! -- �"^ - - � i `*•o'. : ..� _. �:k • ji � .,�f ; . .: .. 0 ' �,'., � _ WSS�$�MI ��' .L. — — �,� •�� t/� �� rJ, ` �1f iG N I �) ` �• • w±• � ��-�.�� ..r�� / tWV YNJ ir �+I W�tl3 �nMnvG n �wS C��+�L �S 1D � r�u�..te �unos�s " n n w� rsra+s�� [cuucrts n�rr, 535 fOt�MD W ♦MG CW'+�r 1W-1 w� taw• SEC. 15. T. 30, R. 24 �rr oF FRiocEr 1 6� COM.�•Oti ^� b f�n• • te(r �bl�r �.. �N �rCV � Q ♦•. (`rlKfv �u��rryi �M �N� t. v IIw..M�..y:ilql( �.1`(Y.r�� MlMvCf �JMC`:: M• r�l t'.. \ 40t 11fr�rSy./ �:� ��. r `•�(:N�OIS rp�l n CprYU+'V S.i9/5 0 ie ' .;:: j" _. �_ ..... : . . ` �' " ;- � t . � ►� � . ,. _ � _��. �, • � �,; � � .. ',.� �, ■� �i O ; R �,.$.• � ' �;; � ... ., • uwx ro. • �.sessr., iw :.as!�+ � sr. � ! .. �...�'- j•�, - -•:: . .: . -. — . .,... ' ,�_. LT �I NSpN'S �`�':. 10 : �r . � , t� , � -. � R c i .l ��ys,.n . '� •, ;� i . _ s . i� Y� `-"' � : ' � �'r ` r� R. ��'� : .• �::.. i . �i . � ' ' � DDfTIOM ,��pD -- ' R�E- ' �; � — ;tj � � Q ll t3 Y - t...• , ', � _ _ . ' ', �..ia: � v.:�...;^; N�6' . r{ u . -__ � Y « � w l� O� fllL� 5 f I �� N ./ TB �' PL +. • �TjQ �, 3. • . , •' .:••! ~'p�D+ � " i •— r '• SiTELLITE WNE � • _ .. ro�_226 jy5 �. . {aTM 'N�Y' 'y . ti, . �,,. �� 15 �� ,.� '�O ' "Z t. � , � s. V . . � i . i ic � �• ; �i�5 \G'� ,•`''��. .�. pk" / A • 31 .,: . . . . � �� ? . ' „ . f� .-' , �S5 ; : : . � � � t w �� +�n�ru�nn ! 1� < �YA �' _ - .• � f i f ��( v . sr�v�w uw[ , � �.. �. t)�1t, .� � ,� �� :- �� . i];(2. r�Y f ; � � . . .- W = s; j ' � •� �- : €RrcKSpN�. ,., _= a . . . , ,: , { :'� r . +' . �,, . � � r i �+ �• � A'lYfR �� .. � , > ... ..�.:.. j ; . .. , '. ; : s� ... : .� � ; - ,�.,� „ _ , .w�.. { � �S ; , .', , �. Q�D 1r�r • '^ I _ � ►� M�NOR. � � i .� ' \ ' .. .......,,�, � - A� RO t1dN �.: �. : ? � Q�AS z ' 3 : ' , �".. . -!�/.:' ;: '' •: �.v ... . .. . . _a � � �, r j o �� . . . it �rt ��r : , ' . / _ `. ._L� '�... . , . ��> }' °,;,aN , ' -. �, -..,.,...: • ��. -�-. - � � . -- `- ,►u�� •' . . _ • •:� = � =. 5 :'� . •. . uur�n�w/� � ' • � � � � • ITtMY 1 � MV�iZ�? / : . _ _ •• . � � b �C1ISfR'S�' IDD � .� S� :IDD�ftON �.. - ttNC YYV - �n�,N�- �•r �s ' . . . . .. �J � . �. i .� i. r�v =�. • , i y� ;-'��f: . "�bYL� [ r � �nwrLni.l , � _ Z_1".,� �• � . �.� — ,'��r� + , ;. ` .. .. . '�/2 r�r y •• � ' 7 �- -a'{ s � :: :. ��•�E:_, :: s rzt. c .Q . _ � 1. - . �' � W ! ! � � J: 2 � � • _ , ' ..,, ,.,, .� ..•t ;' S r� , . � = a � � lF �. ; . . . . L _ . R .i�` . ' �• �: nyc� tac .a . � ,�L. � - •� r sr �.1 �. .. .i, = �..ii .,; ' T • �•�' � ',`' ,+4^ � � �� .r. f(CM�U •�.- �� !C • ' • � YC �S �I' rj �� I:.w I�i ♦ iw.�� ^ �� , :i .'� LITY Of FRIDLEY ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COh1MIS5IDN MEETING APRIL 17, 1984 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Svanda called the April 17, 1984, Environmental Quality Commission meeting to order at 7:38 p.m. ROLL CALL: Menbers Present: Richard Svanda, �laynard Nielson, Bruce Peterson, Tom Gronlund Menbers Absent: Wayne Wellan OTIiERS PRESEt�T: Jim Robinson, Planning Specialist APPROVAL OF MARCH 21 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL �ALITY COMMISSION MINUTES: M02'ION BY MR. PETERSON, SECONDED BY l�t. GRONLUND� TO APPROSB TXE MAR. 2I� I984� ENVIRONMENTAL QUALI'!7 COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEP7. UPON A VOICE VOTE� RLL VOTING AI'E� CHAIRPERSON SVRNDR DECLARED THE MOTZON CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. REVIEW OF HAZAR�OUS WASTE ORDINANCE: Mr. Svanda stated the Ilazardous Waste Ordinance has already been approved by City Council and published, He stated it made him wonder for what purpose the Cortmission was even meeting. It seemed, as a point of courtesy, the City could have at least given them a phone call with regard to tfie urgency of adopting this ordinance. and perhaps the Cortmissio�- .-��ld have called a special meeting and spent some concentrated time on th� ordinance to make a recommendation, He stated it did not seem like the Commission has been working on tfiis ordinance that long since the first draft was pretty poor. Then, with the change in staff with Bill Deblon leaving, there were sane problems in maintaining some continuity. He stated he did not know how the other Comnissioners felt, 6ut he did not appreciate being passed 6y on such an important issue. �1r. Rofiinson stated there was a lack of communication, bLt thQre was also a proposal for a hazardous waste facility in Fridley xhich Mas pending, and the City wanted to get an ordinance on the books. Mr, peterson stated the Commission has 6ad special meetings in the past to study certain issues, and they could have done the same with this particular item. ENUIROWMENTAL QUALITY GOMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 17, 1984 PAGE 2 Mr. Robinson stated the ordinance still needs a lot of work; and it wasn't the intent to have it finalized even though the City Council found the urgency to adopt it. They still need to get input from the Environmental Quality Corrmission and tfie Planning Cortenission. Mr. Svanda stated the reasons for adopting the ordinace were somewhat valid. It was just tfiat the Environmental Qua7ity Comnission should have been involved, It would seem to him that the Commission's input at the City Council meeting would also have been appropriate if the Commission had known about it. Mr. Peterson asked Mr. Robinson if there were any particular areas in the ordinance he felt needed to be addressed and rewritten. Mr. Robinson stated there were several areas he felt needed to be addressed. One was the fact that the ordinance is so inclusive that it would include gas stations which would have to file an environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) that tfiey do not presently have to do with the specia7 use permit. Should there 6e sane restrictions on the numbers of gallons of storage of materials? Or should it be left as is and left up to the discretion of the Environmental Quality Commission or the Planning Comnission? Mr. Svanda stated that, first of all, there is no requirement as far as what has to 6e in an EA4l. There is no reference to the state statutes or to the EQB rules that says an EAW has to contain certain information. That should be done. Mr. Svanda stated they then get into the special use permit issue. He stated their discussion at the Planning Commission has been that a special use permit traditionally goes to the property. He did not think tfiey should be looking at a property specia7 use permit in this ordinance. They want to talk in terms of an owner-operated special use permit. He stated he felt they needed a ruling from the City Attorney regarding wfiether they have the ability to do that. In this ordinance, they should probahly deal with the special use permit to tfie owner and operator and put the burden there, not on the property. So many of the requirements on a hazardous waste facility are on tfie facility owner and operator with regard to financial liabilities and tecfinical requirements. Mr. Svanda stated that with regard to the small facilities, small gas stations, body shops, etc., he did not think they needed to go through an EAW, but they surely sl�ould get a permit and the permit application could be abbreviated, Mr. Svanda stated the City could perhaps get a computer print-out fro� the County which would let the City know who in the City they have under license. They can assume that any gas station, body shop, print shop, cleaners, those types of facilities, are generating hazardous waste. The County should be requiring a hazardous aaste li.cense for tfie generation of hazardous waste. Obtaining tfiis listing should give the City a 6etter idea o# ahat industries ENVIRONMEFITAL QUALITY COM�ISSION MEETING, APRIL 17, 1984 PAGE 3 generate hazardous waste. They could look at their own industrial records, compare the two lists, and find out what industries are generating hazardous waste but are not covered by license b.v the County, He stated he did not think anyone should be exempt from a special use permit, but they could be e�cempt from some requirements like an EAW. Mr. Peterson asked how tfiis would affect the existing operations in the Cit_y. Mr. Svanda stated it would require them to get a special use permit. He stated that if they look at a city map, put a pinhead on City Hall and draw a circle in a 3-mile radius, there are at least 6-12 abandoned hazardous waste dumps. Fridley got these hazardous waste dumps because there were no regulations. Ne stated the City could start lookinq at the biqger generators first, the ones with more potential for problems, and the little ones as they come in. Mr. Svanda stated the issue the Comnission raised right after they first got this ordinance was that no one knew how consistent or inconsistent this ordinance was with regard to the state requirements. He was not sure anyone knew that vet. The issue wasn't so much whether it was consistent or wasn't consistent, but someone should know what it is because if the Waste Manage- ment Board has some override authority,seemingly inconsistencies, meaning more restrictive or just totally different, could plaY a ma,ior role as far as whether the Waste Management Board migfit overrule a local requirement. Mr. Svanda referred to Section 218.07, PRELIMINARY PLANS REQUIRED, Item 2-B, "Soil drainage, composition, thickness in permeabilit�." He stated he had never heard of the term, "thicT-cnessin permea i ity , before and he did not know what it meant. Mr. Svanda stated that under 5ection 218.07, Item 3, he did not believe they needed to qet any permits fran the EQB or the State Waste Management Board. Again, it depended on the broad interpretation of a"permit". Mr. Svanda referred to Section 218.09, CHANGES IN PLANS. He stated there should be something in here regarding the hazardous waste facility itself. In other words. thev might also want to include in the defitions, A-H, sanething relating to the quantity and tvpes of waste, methods of operation and corttrol--factors associated with that versus pure1y city-t.ype things. Mr. Svanda referred to Section 218.11, STANDARDS, Item 7, which stated: "No migration of water overland shall be permitted beyond the property lines." He stated something should talk about environmenta] standards--that the water should not be contaminated by the hazardous waste as being managed. The second part of Item 7 stated, "All ponding of water shall be contained on the site and provisions made to contain all water runoff so as not to discharge into the municipal sanitary sewer system or any storm water system or ditch." dere, it was saying they can only store it inside, but before it gets inside, it is going to come from the outside. So, for example, if there ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETIN6, APRIL 17, 1984 PAGE 4 was some spillage in the unloading area, they would not want that to go into the runoff. Mr. Peterson stated it seemed to him this whole ordinance was directed at storage of hazardous waste and not the generators of hazardous waste. It seemed like the who7e idea was to get this ordinance on the books in order to prevent a fiazardous waste processing facility in tfie City. If they are doing that, they are really not addressing the hazardous waste needs (a total ordinance} for the City of Fridley. It was also very important to look at the places generating hazardous waste. They already know they have tfie sites that are generating hazardous waste, but they do not know if they will ever even have a 6azardous waste processing and storage facility. Consequently, this ordinance as it is now is just a bunch of paper in the code book. Mr. Robinson asked if it was the City's or the County's responsibility to monitor hazardous waste generators. Mr. Svanda stated it was both the City's and the County's responsibility, Mr. Peterson stated he felt they needed to find out what role Anoka County was playing as far as monitori�g hazardous waste generators, if any at all. Mr. Gronlund agreed. He stated he would like to have that information for the next meeting. Mr. Svanda stated it would give the City a feel for whether or not there was a need to have the hazardous waste generators addressed in this ordinance. Mr. Peterson stated that under Section 218.05, SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION PROCEDURES, Item 2, he had expressed the concern before that if the Environ- mental Quality Commission is going to review the application, is there goin� to be adequate information in that application to review and make a recommenda- tion to City Council through the Planning Corr�ission to approve or disapprove2 Mr. Robinson stated it looked like a chronological problem. If they reversed the order of Items 2 and 3, it would help a great deal. Then the developers or owners of the proposed facility would be preparing preliminary drawings and an EAW before it was reviewed by the Environmental Quality Commission. Mr. Peterson agreed it would definite7y make more sense to reverse Ttems 2 and 3. Mr. Peterson stated he really felt they needed a legal opinion on the whole ordinance, because it has to be a usable and an enforceable ordinance to coincide with a71 the rules and documents. Mr. Robinson stated that under Section 218.15, MONITORLNG ANALYSIS AND TESTING, the City Council felt there should be a requirement for bonding to cover the expenses of any necessary testing that might have to be done. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 17 1984 PAGE 5 Mr. Peterson agreed there should be something to cover that expense, but he did not know how it could be worked in. Mr. Svanda stated one thing they might want to find out from the City Attorney is if there was anything under the State Super Fund that would allow the City to do the monitoring and testing and then be able to sue the company to recapture the costs. Mr. Svanda stated there was no requirement in the standards that a special use permit was going to require testing. He referred to Item 3 which stated: "If the City determines that the owner or operator is unable to conduct monitoring, testing, and analysis, or report�ng satisfactory to the City..." He stated the term, "satisfactory to t e ityR,was very unc�. Mr. Svanda referred to Section 218.04, SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL CRITERIA, Items 1-4. He stated Items 2, 3, and 4 are talking about sane kind of technical standards. Assuming they are in compliance with Item 1, Items 2, 3, and 4 could be deleted unless they wanted to specifically address sanething that was not adequately addressed in the state rules. Discussion on the Hazardous Waste Ordinance continued until the next meeting. 2. CONSIDERATION Of RECYCLING AND COMPOSTING SURVEYS: Mr. Ro6inson stated that, as requested, the Commission had copies of two sample surveys, one from Seattle, Washington, and one from Sacramento, California. Discussion continued until the next meeting. 3. CONTINUED: WORK PLAN DISCUSSION The Commission members spent the remainder of the meeting reviewing and revising and updating their work plan for 1984. ADJOURNMENT: MO.^ION BY MR. GRONLUND, SECONDED BY MR. NIELSON, TO RDJOURN THE MEETIt7G. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SVANDA DECLARED THE APRIL 17, 1984, EN[�IRONMENTAL QUALITY COFIIIISSION MEETIf7G ADJOURNED AT 9:45 P.M. Respectfully submitted, �-L� yn Saba Recording Secretary CITY OF fRIDLEY HW SING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING APRIL 19, 1984 CALL 70 ORDER: Chairperson Commers called the April 19, 1984, Housing & Redevelopment Authority meeting to order at 7:12 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Larry Corteners, Elmars Prieditis, Duane Prairie Members Absent: Caro7yn Svendsen, Walter Rasmussen Others Present: Sid Inman, City Finance Director Nasim Qureshi, Dave Newman, City Attorney Michael Warren, Ritter, Suppes, Plautz Architects Michael Moormann, Project Architect, Target Stores APPROVAL OF MARCH 8 1984 HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. PRAZRIE, SECONDED BY MR. PRIEDITIS, TO APPROVE THE MARCN 8, 2984, HOUSING 6 REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINtITES AS WRiTTEN, UPON R VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTSNG AYE, CHAIIZPERSON C1�MMERS DECLARED TNE MOTSON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY: MOTIDN BY MR. PRIEDITIS� SECONDED 8Y MR. PRAIRIE� TO OPEN THE PiJBLZC XEARING ON THE DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY. UPON R VOICE [�OTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED TXE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:14 P.M. Mr. Inman stated this is a public hearinq on the saTe, lease, and disoosition of the property located north of City Hall, bounded on the west by University, on the north by Mississippi St., on the east by 5th Street, and on the south by City Hall (legal description included in agenda packet). He stated that at the current time, the property is in the ownership of the HRA with the exception of the piece on which the Brunkow Music buildinq sits which they have a contract for deed on, He stated they have negotiated with the contract holder, and tF�ey are ready to complete purchase at the time of.execution of the contract documents. HOUSIN6 & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING APRIL 19 1984 PAfE 2 Mr, Inman stated that in the past, it has been the practice of the HRA to hold a public hearing; then approve the sale, disposition, and lease of the property in conjunction with executing or authorizing the contract with the developer,which is shown as Item 3-�A in the agenda. Mr. Inman stated specific purpose of the property was for the development by Dayton Hudson Corp., D/B/A Target Stores. He stated that t4r. Qureshi was at the meeting to make a presentation. Members of the Target Corp. were also in the audience. Mr. Qureshi stated he came before the HRA at their last meeting and gave some of the background on the proposal made to the HRA by Target Stores to develop an office facility north of City Hall. The City was in negotiations with Target for over six months, plus three months when they did not know what canpany they were dealing witfi as tfiey were dealing through a real estate agent. He stated Target fiad been searching all over the northern suburbs for a site for their administrative offices. When they became serious about the site north of City Hall, he met with them in January 1984. Mr, Qureshi stated originally Target had some strict internal company require- ments for space and actually wanted a two-story building on the site, which would have almost covered the entire site with blacktop and building, That was not acceptable to the City, and they encouraged Target to look at the existing terrain of the property and go to a two story building and provide some landscaping and green area around the bui7ding. Fortunately, Target found it feasible for a three-story building, so they came back with the current proposal. Mr. Qureshi stated that, since then, the City has been workinq almost daily with Target trying to define the plan to make the impact of this construction more compatible with the existing facility. One of the things they did work out together was some green space and separation between City Nall and the proposed building. The original plan submitted for the parking lot did meet the parking and size requirements, but they compromised a little bit to provide some green area within the parking lot, They were a61e to save saae of the existing mature trees along Mississippi St, and within the parking lot. Mr. Qureshi stated the City's agreement with Target is to make the property available to them so they can go in and start construction. That necessitates the removing of all the structures, compacting the soil, and reshaping the land and leveling it west of the proposed building so they can provide the parking. Mr, Qureshi stated �tr. Michael Moormann, representative from Target, and an architect, Mr. Michael Warren, were at the meeting to make statements or answer any questions the HRA might have. Mr. Commers asked a6out the number of parking spaces that will be provided. Mr. Qureshi stated there will be about 300 parking spaces. That meets the parking requirements for an office building. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING APRIL 19, 1984 PA6E 3 Mr. Prairie asked if the cars traveling on Mississippi St. would be able to see the cars in the parking lot. Mr, Qureshi stated they did compromise a little bit on the size and aisle space in order to provide some berming and landscaping to minimize the visual impact of the parking lot. Mr, Qureshi stated the City also commissioned a traffic study that especially addressed how they could minimize the traffic impact for a section of this property. Some suggestions were made, and those suggestions have been dis- cussed with Target. Target is willing to incorporate those suggestions. Essentially, there wiil a right in and right out on Mississippi St. Presently, there are two lanes going out onto 5th St., and they are goin� to expand that to three lanes to accortmodate more traffic. In answer to Mr, Prieditis' question concerning surface water drainage, Mr. Qureshi explained the surface drainage plan for the property. The Commission members viewed the model of the new Target building. Mr, Qureshi showed the overall concept of the clinic, future expansion of the clinic, office building, bank, City Hall, and 5th St. He stated that on 5th St., they put in a divider with trees. They hope to eventually work with the County to carry the same divider theme on Mississippi St. That would block the entrance on Mississippi St. for a right in and right out only. Mr. Qureshi stated they plan to carry the same theme for the walkway system with the same cement, brick, trees all the way through the Target develop- ment to the intersection. Mr. Moorman stated they have their distribution center and one of their regional offices in Fridiey. They have quite an investment in Fridley, and it has been a very pleasant relationship with the City. He stated they are looking forward to locating their Northern Operations Center here. Mr. Moormann stated he felt they were going to create a facility that was very comparable in character and quality to the facllity they have in the City Center in downtown Minneapolis. Right now they p7an to move into the buildinq in May 1985. They have scheduTed for the present size with certain built-in expansions projected for 5-10 years. Mr. Comners stated that as long as there was no one else at the meeting to make any canments, he would entertain a motion to close the public hearing. MOTION BY MR. PRAIRIE� SECONDED BY MR. PRIEDZTIS, TO CZASE THE PI7BLIC XERRING ON THE DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY, UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRPERSON COf1MERS DECLRRED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:40 P,M. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING APRIL 19 1984 PA6E 4 2. RECEIVE LETTER fROM JERRY PASCHK�: Mr. Commers stated this item would be continued at the end of the agenda, 3. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION N0. HRA 5-1984 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT WI H T RGET: Mr. Comners asked Mr, Qureshi to give the CommSssioners a 6rief surmiary of the general terms of the contract. Mr. Qureshi stated the members of the HRA had a copy of the sheet that out- lined the parcels that will be designated on this property (handed out at meeting). The basic agreement they have with Target is that the HRA will prepare the property just like any other property that is ready for develop- ment so Target can move in and start development. This will necessitate the HRA moving all tfie structures, doing the grading, and providing some retaining walls. Mr. Qureshi stated the proposal is to sell Target the building footprint (parcel A) at $2/sq. ft. The rest of the property will be leased by Target for 30 years and then sold at an amount of $300,000. Durinq the lease period, Target will pay $15,000 per year. They will provide the maintenance on the property and will pay taxes on all of the property. Mr. Qureshi stated there are two other properties that Target has the option to buy. If they wish to buy those two parcels before the lease is over, they can buy them at $2/ sq. ft. Target's potential expansion, if needed, is to 90,000 sq. ft. One proposed expansion (parcel B-7} is in the northwest corner of the building and is about 3,000 sq. ft. per floor, 7he other pro- posed expansion is on the east side of the building (parcel B-2) and is e6out 2,700 sq. ft. per floor. Mr. Qureshi stated that parcel B-4 was the property where Target will provide parking over it, but the City has retained the right of that property so they can provide cold storage under it and the walkway system could go over it. Parcel B-4 is 2,400 sq. ft. Mr. Qureshi stated that in the southeastern corner of the parking lot (Parcel 6-3), there is a parcel that the City wanted to retain the option on in order to be able to provide a parking ramp in the future to be used by HRA and the City and Target. They have provided for a joint kind of relationship for this space. The City has the right on that property for 30 years. Mr. Cortmers asked if Staff had made an analysis of the parking that may be needed in this area, taking into consideration the expansion of the clinic, and if the Target building is expanded to 90,000 sq. ft, Mr. Qureshi stated they have. If Target expands to 90,000 sq. ft., they would need additional space. As far as the expansion of the cl.inic, it has enou9h parking expansion on site. HOIISI�16 & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, APRIL 19, 1984 PAGE 5 Mr, Conmers stated that with respect to the sale price, he would like some background information from previous appraisals and previous sa7es of property, and sometfiing from Leon Madsen with respect to the square footage price of the land. He felt they should have some information in the record with respect to what they have done in tfie past to support the HRA's action. Mr, Qureshi stated Staff wou7d provide that information for the next meeting. He stated this proposal was in line with what the HRA did for the office building and was a better proposal than what the HRA did for the clinic. MOTION BY HP.. PRRIRZE, SECONDED BY MR. PRIEDIPIS, TO APPROVE RESOLU;ZOtd NO. NRA 5-1984, "RESOLUTION APPROVItIG AND aUTHORZZING THE EXECUTIOPJ OF R CONTRACT FOR PRZVATE DEVELOPMENT 612TH TRRGET", UPON R VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMEAS DECLARED TFT, MO'"ION. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. CONSI�ERATION OF RESOLUTION N0. HRA 6-1984 APPROVING THE CONSTRUCTI�N PLANS OF THE TARGET BUILDIh�G AS SUBMITTED BY THE TARGET CORPORATION: Mr, Qureshi stated they have fairly detailed plans availahle from Tarqet. Target is required per the development agreement to submit plans for the HRA's approval. Mr. Cortmers stated this was mainly for control with respect to the compatibi7ity with the other structures, and this building obviously seems to be in con- formance. He stated this has been discussed in past meetings, and everythinq seemed to be all right. He stated that if the Staff has looked at the pla�s and are in agreement that the plans are in conformance and compatible with City Hall, he did not think the HRA had any probler� with approving the con- struction plans. Mr, Qureshi stated City Staff has made a great attempt to see that everything in the building is in conformance; and, as the HRA members can see from the model, it certainly fits the scheme. MO;IDN BY MR. PRIEDZTIS, SECONDED BY MR. PRAIP,IE, TO AppROVE RESOLL�TIOC7 NO. XRA 6-I984�"A RESOLUSION APPROVING THE CONSTRUCT201'7 PLANS OF THE TARGET BUILDING AS SUBMITTED BY THE' TARGET CORPORATION", UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIEP UNANIMOUSLY. 5, COt�SIDERATION OF RESOLUTION N0. HRA 7-1984 APPROVIP�G THE PLANNED lAYOUT OF Mr. Qureshi stated this is essentially saying that the HRA has reviewed the plan, has entered into a contract, and is now approving for imp7ementation the fina7 plan layout. and authorizing the staff to proceed with the reloca- tion of the tenants in the project area. Mr. Cort�ers stated that as he understood it with regard to relocation, they do have an obligation to a couple of the tenants. It was his original HOUSING & REDEUELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING APRIL 19 1984 PAGE 6 understanding that when the HRA acquired the property, they were going to lease the property on the basis that the tenants would be able to remain on the property without any problem with relocation when the property was needed by the HRA. Mr. Inman stated that was correct; however, they have since found out that particular property owners can waive their rights to relocation, but regular tenants cannot waive their rights because they are not subsequent to the sale of the property. He stated Lifestyle Music and Nortf�western Bell did waive their rights to relocntion,because they were the property owners. He stated they have reviewed this with their re7ocation consultant and with Dave Newman, and it is very clear that the tenants cannot waive those rights when they had no rights in the first place. He stated that as far as relocation, the HRA has an obligation to the follawing tenants: Gary's Automotive........ $10,000 (estimate) Ms. Douthitt ............ 5,500 (estimate) Royal Electric .......... 15,0�0 (estimate) Mr. Inman stated Gary's Automotive intends to move at tf�e end of May. Royal Electric has found a place and intends to move in May. Northwestern Bell will be out the end of April. They have qualified Ms. Douthitt for Section 8 housing and are currently looking for an apartment for her. MO'_"ION BY MR. PRZEDITIS� SECONDED BY MR. PRRIRIE� TO APPP.OVE RESOLUTIOTI NO. HRA 7-1984� ^A P•ESQLUTION APPROL'ING THE PLANNED LAYOUT OF TARGE'1' PROJECT WITHIN THE CENTE'R CITY REDEVELOPMENT DYSTRICT". UPON A VOICE S�OTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAZRPERSON COMMERS DECZJIRED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION N0. HRA 8-1984 REOUESTING THE CITY COUNCIL OF Mr. Qureshi stated that page 6E of the agenda documented the buildings on site that needed to be removed. The proposals are such that there is a bid on each separate building. They reason they did that was because there are certain people who deal more with salvaging and moving, and other people who deal just with demolition. So, in sane cases the City will be getting money back for salvage. He stated the list on agenda page 66 showed the buildings and the bids. The low bid was chosen for each of the buildings, except for the high bid on Building �1, Madsen Buildinn. The project, if awarded as indicated on the 7ist, will be $18,805. MOTZON BY MR. PRIEDITIS� SECONDED BY FII2. COMMERS, TO APPP,OVE RESOLUTION NO. HRA 8-2984� "A RESOLUTION REQUESTIl7G TXE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY APPROVE AND AGIARD BIDS FOR THE DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF CERTAIN STRUCTURES". UPON A VOICE VOTE� R'LL V027NG RYE, CHAZRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOSION Carried UNRNIFfOUSLY. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING APRIL 19 1984 PAGE 7 7. At this time, Mr. Comners thenked Mr. Moormann and Mr. Warren for coming to the meeting. He stated the HRA was looking forward to working with them. He stated the HRA felt it was going to be a terrific project and will certainly contribute to the City of Fridley in a nice way. Mr. Moormann thanked the Staff and the HRA for their time. He stated the people he is working with in the corporation are very excited about this project. Chairperson Comners declared a ten-minute recess at 8:30 p.m, Mr. Commers asked fiow the numbers, as far as costs, were arrived at in the next resolutions. Mr. Qureshi stated they were strictly engineers' estimates in order to get an idea of what numbers they are talking about. Mr. Qureshi stated it is the City's proposal to plat all the property from 63rd to tlississippi St. and University to 5th St, This wi71 then complete all the property in this quadrant in order to describe who owns what and have it all legally tied down. MOTION BY MR. PRAIRIE� SECONDED BY MR, pRIEDITIS� TO RPPROVE RESOLUTION ND, (fRA 9-1984� "RESOLUTION RUTHORZZING THE CITY STAFF TO OBTAIN A PLAT OF TIIE CENTER CITY AREA SOUTX OF MISSISSIPPZ STREET AND EAST OF UNIVERSITY AVENUE" UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHRIRPERSON COP.*MERS DECLARED TIIL MOTZON CARRZED UNANI1fOUSLY. 8. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO.HRA 10-1984 AUTHORIZING THE CITY STAFF TO I FFIC S R H 5 H E R C N E CI Y: Mr. Qureshi stated this study has been completed. It was requested because they wanted to know the impact the Target building would have with over 300 employees and because of its location. MOTIQN BY MR. PRIEDZTIS, SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRIE, TO APPROVE RESOLUTIDN NO. HRA ID-1984� "RESOLUTION AUSHORIZING THE CITY STAFF TO OBTRZN A TRJIFFZC STUDY FOR THE SSH STREET AREA OF CENTER CITY". UPON A VDICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHRIRPERSON CQMMERS DECI.ARED THE MOTIOP7 CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING APRIL 19 1984 PAGE 8 9. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION N0. HRA 17-1984 AUTHORIZING THE CITY STAFF Mr. Qureshi stated it is tfie HRA's responsibility to provide a clear site for construction and remove all the existing structures. After the structures are removed, they have to fill in where the structures were, compact the soil, clear and grub, remove any bad material, grade the property and do the storm water control so it is prepared for Target to begin construction. Mr. Commers asked why the HRA had �o give authorization to the City for all this right now. Why can't they put tfie bids out when the time comes and then give approval? Mr. Qureshi stated the HRA would be giving the City the authorization to do all this work. An estimated figure of $144,000 was given. He stated the City Council meets frequently and the HRA does not. This is just a vehicle to get the process going. He stated the HRA will have actual bids and numbers on this like they did for the demolition and removal of the structures. Mr. Corrrners stated that, in terms of what the 1lRA's responsibility is and when it comes down to the ultimate decision, he felt it was a problem always appointing the City to be its agent. Mr. Qureshi stated there are some time restraints. Normally, the process they are trying to squeeze into two months probably should take ten months. Target plans to start building June i, and he did not think all the legal things will be done by then. That is the reason the City felt that, since the work is necessary, the HRA should make the City Council its agent, The HRA has the estimated numbers, and if the nwnbers are different, they will come back to the HRA. The NRA will also have the documentation available when the actual bids are taken. Mr. Commers stated he really had a problem with this and asked if there was some way to resolve the time restraints. Mr. Qureshi stated maybe the HR.4 could hold specia7 meetings. Mr. Prieditis stated he agreed with Mr. Commers. Mr. Commers stated the next few resolutions involve a substantial amount of money. Mr. Qureshi stated these were all estimated outside numbers and all of them, other than the NSP work, wi17 be public bids. Mr. Comners stated that was fine, but maybe there should 6e some input from the HRA as to what is being done and sane input back as to exactly how the project is going to go and what is going to be involved. Ne stated maybe NOUSIN6 & REDEVELOPHENT AUTHORITV MEETING APRIL 19 1984 PAGE 9 l�. Staff could give the HRA a schedule with a timetable of when these thinvs are contemplated to be done and when they need to be done. Mr. Comners stated be basically had the following two questions: (1) Is this a proper procedure for the HRA to follow? It may be legally permissible, but is it proper? (2) What about input into the preject itself? The HRA does not want to get involved in the day-to-day things, but he felt the HRA should know more about the project when these thin�s are talked about in a general way. The HRA should get a little more background information and see some information that tells what is bein9 proposed. Mr, Qureshi stated he thought they were providing this information. Mr. Prieditis stated that what concerned him was the HRA would be authorizing monies which amounted to $600-700,000. There are a lot of unknowns. Is the HRA in the position to do this? He would like to look at the budget and see where they stand. Maybe the HRA could approve some of the more urqent matters and wait on the others. Mr. Commers stated it was his persona] opinion that he was uncomfortable with delegating this kind of authority to the City. Mr. Qureshi stated that if the HRA was willing to meet every two weeks, he would have no problem with that. Staff would 6e willing to be available for those meetings. Mr. Prairie stated that, if extra meetings would he7Q, he would 6e willing to meet every week or every other week. Mr. Comners asked the Staff to put together a schedule which would include a bid schedule, a bid opening schedule, and an awarding schedule. He asked that this be provided to the HRA so they can decide, from their point of view, what the best way is to handle these. Mr. Qureshi stated Staff would provide the HRA with this information. Mr. Inman stated the most critical reso]utions as far as timing were Resolution No. HRA 12-1984 and Resolution No. HRA 13-1984. MO_TION BY MR. PRAZRIF� SECONDED BY MR. PRZEDITIS� TO APPROVE RE50LUTION NO. HRA 12-1984 "RESOLUTION AUTHOP,IZING 2HE CZTY SSRFF CONTRACT FIITH NOP.THERN STATES POWER FOR THE REMOVAL OF CERTAIN pOWER LINES AND FOR THE PLACING O£ THOSE POWER LINES UNDERGROUND", UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLFSRED THE MOTION CAF2RZED UNANSMOUSLY. HOUSING & REDEVELOPP1ENT AUTHORITY MEETING APRIL 19 1984 PAGE 1( 11. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION N0. HRA 13-1984 AUTHORIZING THE CITY STAFF TO WORK WITH R.S.P. ARCHITECTS: Mr. Comners stated that part of this design was for storage facilities and garage facilities for the police and the city. He asked if there should be some shared costs with the city on that? Hr. Qureshi stated they are thinking of sharing 50/50 of the architect's fees on these things. This resolution provides for the hiring of the architect at a fee not to exceed $1i,000. It should be a separate request to the Staff to ask the City Council to participate in a 50/50 shared cost with the architect. 1fOTION BY MR. PRIEDITIS� SECONDED BY MR. PRAZRZE� TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. HRA 13-1984, "RESOLUTSON RUTHOXIZING THE CITY STAFF TO ZIORK WITX R.S.P. ARCXITECTS". UPON A VDICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRPERSON COMMEP,S DECLARED TH£ MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Chairperson Commers stated the HRA would direct Staff to request the City Council to participate in the architect's fee on a 50/50 basis. Mr. Inman stated he would like to deal with the rest of the items (Resolutions HRA 1i-1984, NRA 14-1484, kRA 15-1984, and HRA 76-1984) under one single construction fund. If the HRA's concern was in just awarding the bids, then he did not think it wou7d be a problem for the City Council to act as the HRA's agent. Mr. Canmers asked what the HRA had done in the past. For example, how did they handle the demolition, etc., of the Doty property? Mr. Inman stated some of it was authorized by the HRA, and some of was authorized by the City Council, depending upon the speed with which they had to act. t� believed most of the demolition work was contracted through the City and the HRA paid the City. Mr. Qureshi stated that, again, providing the information to the HRA was no problem; it was just the time restraint. Mr, Inman stated he felt the HRA would have to authorize the City to call for bids. Anything over $15,000, the HRA has to authorize the publication calling for bids. Mr. Cormters stated that, if the HRA authorized the ca71 for bids, would tne HRA be able to review the things being bid on at the May meeting? Mr, Qureshi stated they could have some plans available at that meeting. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETIN6 APRIL 19 1984 PAGE 11 MOTION BY MR. PRIEDITIS� SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRIE� TO AUTXORIZE THE PUBLICATIDN CALLIP7G FOP, BIDS FOR RESOLUTION NO. HRA I1-2984 ("RESOLU?'IDN AUTHORIZING THE CITY STAFF TO CONTRACT FOR SITE PREPAI2ATION OF THE LAP7D NORTN OF CITY NALL")j RESOLUTION NO. HRA 24-I984 (°RESOLUTION AUTHORIZIP7G THE CONSTRUCTZON OF THE RETAINING WRLL"); P,ESOLUTION NO. HRR 15-2984 (°RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF MI5CELLANEOUS STORAGE FACILITIES AND BRIDGE"); AND RESOLUTION NO. IIRA 16-1984 [°RESOLUTSON AUSHORIZING THE CITY TO CONSTRUCT A CONCRETE/BRSCK WALKGIAY, WALHI9AY LIGHTS� SERVZCE DRIVE AND LANDSCAPING"); AND TO AUTHORIZE CITY STAFF TO SEPRRATE OR COMBINE TNE VARIOUS ITEMS FOR BIDDING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CNAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 12, CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTI�N N0. HRA 17-1984 AUTHORIZING THE GITY STAFF TO MOTION BY MR. PRAZRIE, SECONDED BY MR. PRIEDITZS�� TO APPROL� RESOLUTION N0. HRA 27-Z984� "RESOLUTIQV AUTHORIZING THE CITY STAFF 2Y� COMPLETE THE MOVSNG OF THE CITY'S LIQUSD PETROL.EUM AND THE BURYIP7G OF THO5E SANKS", UPON A VOICE VOTE, RLL VOTINC AYE� CNRIRPERSON COAIMERS DECLARED TIIE MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 13. RECEIVE LETTER FROP1 JERRY PASCHKE: Mr. Qureshi stated that Mr, Paschke proposes to develop a 30,�0� sq. ft. buildinq on Lot 5 and a 15,000 sq. ft. bui7ding on Lot 3. Basically, there are two problems with this area: soil problems and drainage problems. He stated it would 6e Staff's recommendation to tal:e the same basic approach as the HRA did in the past that the HRA would be only a party to the total cost and not pay all the cost. It would involve calling for bids, correcting the soil, and going through the process. He felt this was reasonable assistance to provide and then go on to the approach of buying the land, writing down the land, and selling it. If the HRA is agreeable to this, he would propose they authorize a public hearing for the sale of land and at that time, the City would bring in a developers agreement for the HRA to approve. Mr. Comners stated that when the HRA discussed this with Mr. Paschke in the past, they told him they were wil7ing to give some assistance. They never made any commitment for total assistance on this project. At that time, they had asked Mr. Boardman to meet with Mr. Paschke to negotiate something and indicate that the HRA was willing to do something in terms of participation. He stated the HRA cannot make a commitment until they see some negotiations. Mr. Qureshi stated that if the HRA was willing to give some assistance, they should go ahead and set up a public hearing for the sale of land, the City would submit a developers agreement, put in some numbers and give the rationale for those numbers. He stated fie has discussed this with HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING APRIL 19 1984 PAGE 12 14. Mr. Paschke. Mr, Paschke does have some documentation on what the costs of soil correction and bidding are. The HRA's approach would be basically along the same guideling as was done with the two other projects in this tax increment district, If the HRA was comfortable wiih that, he would negotiate with Mr, Pasc�ke and come back with the proposed agreements, Mr. Comners asked if they were talking about a public hearing on Lots 3, 5, and 6? Mr. Qureshi stated there was also a proposal on Lots 4 and 7, and he would suggest they include those two lots in the pu6lic hearing to start the process. Mr. Cortmers stated he had no prob7em calling for a public hearing on Lots 3, 5, and 6, but they have not had any information on Lots 4 and 7, The HRA has a7ways taken the same position, that something should be negotiated and,subject to staff negotiation, the HRA is willing to give some assistance. MOTION BY MR. PRAIRIE� SECONDED BY MR, PRIEDITIS� TO RUTNORIZE THE CRLLING FOR A PUBLIC XEARING ON LOTS 3, 5� AND 6. UPON A VOICE VOT.E� ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRpEF.SON COMMEP.S DECLARED SHE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Inman stated this is a standard resolution that the City has adopted. Most cities have resoiutions like this. This would authorize him as the HRA's finance officer to authorize with his signature the release of checks prior to the HRA's approval. This will essentially save 7ate charges and allows him to take any discounts when availabTe. He stated these checks will be on the check register and, if the HRA has a problem with a check, even though the monies have gone out, the HRA can still bring an action on it. Mr. Inman stated this was discussed at the last HRA meeting. MOTION BY MR, PRAIRIE� SECONDED BY MR. PRIEDITIS� TO APPROVE RESOLUTION N0. HRA 18-I984,"RESOLUTION OF TNE NOUSZNG 6 REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FO 2NE CITY OF FRIDLEY AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT OF CERTAIN CLAIMS WITHOUT PRIOP. HOUSING & REDEVEIAPMENT AUTHORITY APPROVAL". UPON R VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHRIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. HOUSIN6 & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, APRIL 19, 1984 PAGE 13 15. CHECK REGISTER APPROVAL: MOTZON BY MR. PRIEDITIS, SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRIE� TO APPROVE THE CHECR REGISTER DATED APRIL 6, I984� IN TXE AMOUNT OF $26�742.09. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED TNE ItOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 16. AUTNORIZING PAYMENT TO NERRICK & NEWMAN: MOTION BY MR. PRAIRIE� SECONDED BY MR. PRIEDITIS� R1� APPROVE THE PAYMENT TO NERRICK 6 NEWMAN IN THE AMOUNT OF 5335.80 AS PRESENTED IN THEIR IMi'OZCE DATED APRIL 10, 1984, UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED TH° MOTION CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADJOUR��MENT: MOTION BY MR. PRIEDITSS� SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRIE� TO AA7QURN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE APRIL Z9� I984, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING AA7QURNED AT 10:30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, v r-� u..� Lyri e Saba Recording Secretary C1TY OF FRIDLEY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETIN6 APRIL 23, 1984 CAL L TO ORDER: Chairperson Kondrick called the April 23, 1984, Parks & Recreation Comnission meeting to arder at 7:40 p.m. ROLL CALL: Meeibers Present: Dave Kondrick, Mary Schreiner, Dick Young, Dan Allen, Steve Nelson Mernbers Absent Others Present: None Charles Boudreau, Parks & Recreation Director APPROVAL OF PIARCH 23, 1984, PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: MO°_'ION BY MR, ALLEN� SECONDED BY MS. SCHREINER� TO APPROVE THE MARCH 23� 1984, PAF2KS d RECRERTION COMMISSION MINUTES AS fIRITTEN, UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. APPROUAL OF AGENDA: KONDRZCK DECLARED THE MOTION Dr. Boudreau stated he would like to add the following items under "Director's Report": D. Letter from Faith Academy E. Letter from Woodcrest Baptist School F. Naturalist Division Annual Report MO'"ION BY MS. SCHREINER, SECONDED BY MR. YOUNG, TO RPPROVE THE AGENDA RS AMENDED. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAZRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE NOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. INTRODUCTION OF NEW COMMISSION MEMBER, STEVE NELSON: Mr. Kondrick introduced Mr. Nelson to the Corrmission members and welcomed him tothe Comnission. He thanked Mr, Nelson for his willing�ess to parti- cipate. It was nice to know there are people who care about what is going on in their comnunity. He stated he knew Mr. Nelson's input would be very valuable to the Cortmission. PARKS & RECREATION COhP1ISSI0N MEETING APRIL 23 1984 PAGE 2 Mr. Nelson stated he has lived in Fridley all his life. He is currently the fiockey coach at the Fridley High 5chool, He has ambitions of being a college coach sane day. He stated he was interested in serving on the Cortmission because he liked to get involved and help out in the community. 2. DIRECTOR'S REPOR7: a. 1983-84 Warming House and Ice Area Report Dr. Boudreau stated the written warming house report was lost, but he would give a ver6al report, Dr. Boudreau stated tfie attendance figures for the ice skating rinks with warming houses were very similar to the previous year. There was an average of 29 skaters per rink this year versus an average of 38 last year. Dr. Boudreau stated it was a terri6le winter for outdoor ice with the amount of snow and the variations in temperature. It was computed at 46 skating days this year versus 49 skating days last year. Dr. Boudreau stated he would like to recommend that next year they maintain the same level of service to the residents regarding the ice areas. One thing they wil7 do a little different this year is they will leave the Madsen park rink up all year around. It will save on the maintenance time in taking it down and putting it up. They are also planning to transfer tfie lights that are presently at Rice Creek School to Madsen, In order to warrant that type of 7ighting, they almost have to leave the rink in tf�e same location. h. Title VI Information Dr, Boudreau stated that, as the Commissioners knew, the Parks & Recre- ation Department does put together a lot of publications. He stated the U. S. Department of the Interior sent them an audit to see if they were complying with the Title VI Civil Rights Act of 1964. He stated they did not meet the requirements in the audit so in the future they have to put in their publications the information that they will not discriminate against race, color, national origin, sex, age, or handicap. Also, any group the City works with such as the HAF, FYSA, Fridley Jaycees, Lions Club, Community Education, etc., when these groups are using the City's facilities or have a joint program, they Iuve to sign a form stating they wi71 not discriminate. Dr. Boudreau stated tf�ey also have to have a complaint process, so if anyone feels he/she has been or is being discriminated against, he/she can file a complaint fDrm, it is reviewed, and sent in to the U.S. �epartment of the Interior. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 23 1984 PAGE 3 Dr. Boudreau stated this was for the Commission's information. He stated these things will go into effect June 1, 1484, MOTZON BY MR. YOUNG� 5ECONDED BY MS. SCHREINER� TYJ ACCEPT TXE POLICY REGARDING DISCRIMINATIQN IN TZTLE VZ OF THS CIVSL RIGSTS ACT OF 1964. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL WTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED UNRNIMOUSLY. c. Report on So�ftball Tournaments Dr, Boudreau stated they now have one weekend left to be fi77ed, and that is the weekend of Aug. 25-26. At the 7ast meeting the Corarnission recor�nended to approve the softball request fran the Fridley Jaycees, tentatively approve the softball request from the Spring Lake Park Ambulance Program of School Dist, 16 untit further information was obtained, and to place Joe's Place Pizza on a waiting list. Dr. Boudreau stated they met with the Spring Lake Park A46ulance Program people, and tF�ose people decided they really did noi meet the City's policy and decided to wfthdraw their appltcation. Dr. Boudreau stated they tfien followed up and contacted Tony Wajda oP Joe's Place Pizza because he had first priority for any cancellations. Mr. Wajda confirmed tfiat he will have a tournament on July 13-14, and he will abide by the City's tournament policy. d. Letter fran Faith Academy Dr. Boudreau stated the City has received a letter from Faith Academy stating they would like to use the Moore Lake softball field for games on April 10, 24, 26, and 30. He stated he has informed Faith Academy that the fields are open on a first-come, first-serve basis, because the City does not want to get into the process of reserving public facilities for a religious-run school. e. Letter from Woodcrest Baptist Academy Dr. Boudreau stated the City has a7so received a]etter from Woodcrest Baptist Church requesting the use of the new canmunity park Por an 8- team soccer tournament. He stated the church also sent a$200 contri- bution to be used for maintenance of facilities. Dr, Boudreau stated he would like to see the Carmission give some thought to coming up Nith a similar policy for soccer tournaments or the use of the carmunity park, as they have done for softball. Ne stated this was the same type of request as the one from Faith Academy. It was his personal opinion that it was using public dollars to promote and support a private school institution. He did not know whether that was right or not. He stated they did find out from legal counse7 that the City's PARKS & RECREATION COMMI55I0� MEETING APRIL 23 1984 PAGE 4 facilities have to be open to everyone, and that he concurred with. So, that is why they have told the private schools that the City's facilities are open to everyone on a first-come, first-serve basis. Mr. Young stated they could be wrong in doing this, because, for example, the Columbia Heights School District must provide transporta- tion to those chi7dren who live in the Coiumbia Neights School District who go to Imnaculate Conception School in Columbia Heights. The Fridley public schools must provide counseling services to the students at Grace High School, the use of school psychologists, speech therapists, and other staff people that the District could have in their employ, It was his understanding also that school districts must help fund non- religious textbooks, school lunch reimbursement, anything that is not re]igious-oriented, Dr,�Boudreau stated that might be true of the school districts' responsi- bility, but was it the City's responsibility also? Mr. Young stated he was not sure, but it was sanething they should get a legal opinion on. If a school district must expend funds for the benefit of children attending a private school, religious or non- religious, maybe the City is also required to expend funds for them to have an athletic program within the city's facilities? It was not promoting the religious belief by allowing the religious school to have a soccer tournament or have atf�letic programs in t[ie citX�s facilities. Dr. Doudreau stated they got a 7ega7 opinion from the City Attorney on whether the private schools could even use the city's facilities for school programming. Right now, they use the city's facilities for - the physical education program, football, soccer, softball, etc., just liFe it is their facility. Ms. Schreiner asked what city facilities the public schools, either Sprinq Lake Park or Fridley, use as far as asking for areas similar to the private schools. Dr. Boudreau stated the public schools use tf�E outdoor areas such as the softball fields. These activities are scheduled 6ecause, in return, the City uses tfie schools' indoor facilities all winter long, and some of the City's facilities are on School District 14 property. They also have a tennis court on both Dist. 16 and Dist. 13 property. So, it is a cooperative venture. The City is using the schools' facilities, primarily those of Dist. 14, during the winter, plus there are some joint facilities outside the school for other times. Ms. Schreiner agreed they should get a legal opinion on the use of City facilities by private schools. Dr. 8oudreau stated they should Pind tf�is out and mayt�a tFiey could set up some kind of policy for the corr�nunity park facility where there wou7d be a rental fee for the use of that facility by anyone who wanted to rent it. Similarly, they should extend that to anyone who wants to use a� of the City's facilities on a scheduled basis. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETiNG APRIL 23 1984 PA6E 5 MQTION BY 1NS, SCHREINER, SECONDED BY MR. YOUNG� TO REpUEST STAFF 21� OBTAIN A LEGAL OPINION FROM THE CITY AT25�RNEY AN WHETHER OR NOT THE CITY MUST LET A PRIVATE 5CHODL (WOODCREST BAPTIST ACADEMY AND FAITH ADADEMY) USE CSTY FACILITIES ON A SCHEDULED BASZS. IF THE CITY DOES NOT HAVE TO DO TXZS� TXEN THE COlfMISSSON SHOULD PROCEED TO SET UP SOME TYPE OF RENTAL FEE pOLICY. UPON A POICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED TNE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION BY PII2. NEISON� SECONDED BY MR, ALLEN� TD THANK WOODCREST BAPTIST CHURCH FOR TXEIR DONATION OF $200. UPON A VOICE YOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CNAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANINOUSLY, f, Naturalist Division Annual Report MOTION BY dlR. YOUNG� SECONDED BY MR, ALLEN� TO ACCEPT THE NATURALZS_^ DNZSSON ANNURL REPORT FOR 2983. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CNRIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED TFIE MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Dr. Boudreau stated that if the Canmission members had any questions regarding the report, Mr. St. Clair would be willing to attend a meeting to answer tfieir questions. Mr. Kondrick stated he t6ougfit it would be a good idea to invite Mr. St. Clair to the next Comnission meeting to discuss this report and other things going on at the nature center. Mr. Young suggested the Comnission schedule tF�eir May meeting at Springbrook Nature Center. The Comnission members agreed to have their May 14th meeting at Spring- brook Nature Center. 3. NEW BUSINESS: a. Surtmer Playground Fees Dr. Boudreau stated the fees are the same as last year. They are as follows: Playground program -$20, maximum $32 per family Tiny Tots -$15. maximum $20 per family Dr. Boudreau stated the Rice Creek location where tF�ey used to have a playground program will be moved to Benjanim-Briardale Park. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 23 1984 PAGE 6 MOTION BY MR. ALLEN�.SECONDED BY hII2. YOUNG� TO ACCEPT THE PARK FEE SCHEDULE FOR 1989 AS PRESENTED. UPON R VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED SHE MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. , ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MS. SCHREINER, SECONDED BY 1�2. ALLEN� TO ADJOURN THE MEETZNG. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE APRIL 23, I984, PARKS 6 RECREATION COMMISSION MEETZNG ADJOURNED AT 9:00 P.M. Respectfully submitted, � ynn Sa6a Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEY APPEALS COhP1ISSI4N MEETING, APRIL 24, 1984 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Gabel called the April 24, 1984, Appeals Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Menhers Present: Pat Gabel, Aleac Barna, Jim Plemel, Jean Gerou, Donald Betzold Members Absent: None Others Present: Darrel Clark, City Staff LeRoy 6oranson, 590 - 40th Ave. N.E. - City of Columbia Heights APPROVAL OF APRIL 10, 1984, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. BARNA� SECONDED BY MS. GEROU� RY� APPROVE THE APRIL 1Q� 1984, APPEALS COHMISSZON MINUTES AS WRITTEN, UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CFIAZRPERSON GASEL DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRZED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. REQUEST FOR VARIANCES PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE 6LUCK I iAKGEI HDUiTION THE SAME BETNG'765 - 53R1T ;4VfNUE'N f (Request by Richard E. Green, 90 32 Lane N.E., Blaine, Mn. 4 MOTION BY MR. BARNA� SECONDED BY MR, BETZOLD� TO OPEN THE PIIBLIC I:F.ARSNG. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE� CHAIRPERSON CABEL DECLARED THE PUBLZC HEARING OPEN AT 7:32 P.M, Chairperson Gabel read the Administrative Staff Report: ADMINISTRATIYE STAFF REPORT 765 - 53rd Avenue N.E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.15.3A requires a minimum lot area of 35,000 square feet for C-3 zoning. Pu61ic purpose served by this requirement is to provide adequate open space areas around commercia] structures for aesthetic and firefighting purposes. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 24 1984 PAGE 2 Section 205.15.3C.1 requires a minimum front yard setback of 80 feet for all permitted buildings. Public purpose served by this requirement is ta provide for adequate parking and open landscaped areas as well as to avoid congestion and provide adequate siie Cl�arances in commercial areas. Section 205.15.3C.3 requires a minimum rear yard setback of 40 feet for a71 permitted buildings. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide adequate open space around cortNnercial structures for aesthetic and fire- fighting purposes. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "The lot size is due to tfie fact that it is closed in on all four sides. No additiona7 land is available. The reduced lot size makes it necessary to build on the front and rear setbacks. However,the land use is well under the 40 percent maximum." C. ADMINISTRATIYE STAFF REVIEW: Tfie petitioner has lost his option to PurcF�ase thys property and therefore tf�is item should be continued until such tiroe as he is able to obtain a new option to purchase. The item shall be heard on or before June 26, 1984, or the petition shall become void, If the Board moves to recomnend approval on the request, the Staff has no stipulations to suggest. Mr. Clark stated he did not understand how this got mixed up, but there was a future option to purchase granted by Target to another person for another 6usiness on this property. That option has not expired to date. Th1s petitioner did not notify the City that he did not have an actual option to purchase until after the notices had been sent out. However, he did discover it before he pet9tioned for a spec�al use permit before the Planning Cormiission for a car repair shop in a C-3 district, so that process has not been started to date. Mr. Clark stated if the petitioner regains the option to purchase, then he thought they could re-enact this petition, together with the new petition for the special use permit for the car repair business, Mr. Clark stated the reason he felt this request should be continued was it has been a policy of the City that once sanething has been acted on, nothing new can be acted on it for a period of one year. He feli the variances requested by the petitioner were reasonable. The only reason for continuing it was because the petitioner does not have the option to purchase. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING APR1L 24 1984 PA6E 3 MOTIDN BY ?iS. GEROU� SECONDED BY l�t. H11RNA, TO CONTINUE TEIE REpUEST FOR VARIANCES PURSUANT 21� CHAPTER�-205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY G1�Dfi TO REDUCE THE LOT SIZE FROM TXE REQUIRED 35�000 SQ. FT. TO 22,17I S�. PT.� TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK FROH 80 FT. TO 66 FT. AND Rt7 REDUCE THE REQUIRED REAR YARD 5ETBACK FROM 00 FT. TO 10 FT. 4YJ ALLOW THE CONS2RUCTZON OF A REPAIR GARAGE TO BE IACAT&D ON LOT 1, BLOCK 1, TARGET ADDI2ION� THE SAME BESNG 765 53RD AVENUE N,E.� WITH TKE SSIPULATIDN THAT THSS REQUEST BE HEARD ON OR BEFORE JUAE 26� I984, UPON A VQICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPEP,SON GABEL DECLAP.ED THE MOTZON CARRSED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. ELECTION QF CHAIRPERS�N ANO VICE-CHAIRPERSON FOR 1984: MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD� SECONDED BY MS. GEROU� 2t� CAST A UNANIMOUS BRLIAT FY�R PAT GABEL AS CHAIRPERSAN AND ALEX BARNA RS VICE-CXAIRPERSON OF TFE APPEALS COMMISSION FOR 1984. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL YOTING AYE, CflAIRPERSON GRBEL DECLARED THE MOSION CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY MS. GEROU, TO AATOURN THE MEETING. UPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE APRIL 24, I984, APPEALS COMMIS5ION MEETING ADJOVRNED AT 8:45 P.M. Respectfully su itted, �1 �-a.. Ly n Saba Recording Secretary CITY OF fRIDLEY ENERGY COM�tISSIUN MEETING APRIL 24, 1984 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Saba called the April 24, 1984. Energy Lomnission meeting to order at 7:45 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Dean Saba. Brad Sielaff, Dale Thompson Mernbers Absent: Bruce Bondow Otiiers Present: Jim Robinson, Planning Specialist APPROVAL OF APRIL 24, 1984 LENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTZON BY MR. TXOMPSLNI� SECONDED BY XR. SIELAFF� TO APPROVE THE APRIL 24� 1984, ENERGY COflMISSION MINUTES AS 47RZTTEN, UPON R VOSCE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE, CNAIRPERSON SABA D£CI.ARED TfIE MOTZOT7 CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. CO��TINUED: COMPUTERIZED ENERGY PLANI�ING PROCESS Mr. Saba stated he had not been able to get in touch with Janice Thanpson, Land Use Planner for the Department of Energy, so they would have to continue discussion on this iten until the next meeting. He stated he would like to see if Ms. Thanpson could meet with the Commission to go over the energy data collection forms. 2. CONSIDERATION OF MHFA HOME IMPROYEMENT LOAN PR06RAM: Mr. Saba stated that in July of 1983, the MHFA (Minnesota Housing Finance Agency)announced the MHFA Local Participation Program. Under this program, cities, acting through participating lenders, may purchase special comnit- ments of MHFA Home Improvement or Home Mortgage funds for exclusive use within their canmunities to meet unique local housing needs. Under this program E7,111,000 in Hane Mortgage funds have been awarded to six cities. 51.335�000 in Home Improvement and Home Energy loan funding has 6een awarded to eleven cities. Mr. Saba stated that on Feb. 23, 1984, the MHFA Board of Directors allocated 5750,000 to the Local Participation Program for financing fiane improvements. Therefore, the MHfA is now accepting applications for Loca1 Participation in the Home Improvement Loan Program. This Local Participation Program wi11 run from June 7 through December 31. 1984. ENERGY COhMISS10N MEETING APRIL 24 1984 PAGE 2 Mr. Saba stated that funds will be provided to participating connnunities at an interest rate of 11%. The carmunities must pay a cannitment fee equal to 2% of the cammitment artrount. The co�nitment fee is refunded : proportionately as loans are submitted to MHFA for purchase. The commit- _ ment Pee may 6e paid 6y the originating Tender, Mr. Saba stated it atso stated that interest rates on the loans may be subsidized with local funds. He wondered if this could include funds obtained through CDBG grants. Mr. Robinson stated they probably could as long as it benefitted low and moderate income people. He stated he had brought this item to the Energy Cortmission because he thought the loans could possibly be used for energy improvements; however, he did not think the loans could be used strictly for energy improvements. Mr. Saba stated the program sounded interesting, especially if CDBG monies could be used to subsidize it, rather than city funds. However, the appli- cation deadline was May 15, 1984, and it was not feasible for them to be able to prepare an application in such a short time. Also, there wasn't staffing available to oversee this program, Mr. Robinson stated a program like this would make a 9ood project for an intern. Mr. Sielaff stated he would like to know how successfu7 this program was. If it is a good program, maybe it will be renewed next year. Mr. Saba stated the Canmission may want to prepare for this and put it in their work plan, They did have a simiiar goal in a previous work plan. Mr. Saba stated some of the questions he would like answered concerning this home improvement loan program were: Can they use CDBG funds? If they can, what are the income limitations? What kind of restrictions are there, if any, on how the money is used for home renovation? Mr. Saba stated the MHFA also has another non-local participation program at interest rates ranging fran 3% to 10�% depending on the incane. In most cases, people may borrow uq to $15,000 and maximum loan term is 15 years. Loans are available through over 220 lending institutions state-wide. Loans may be used for energy-saving improvements, including insulation and storm windows, accessibility improvements for the disabled, solar equipment for domestic hot water, space heating that meets MHFA guidelines, room additions, electrical, p]umbing, wiring, etc. 17r. Saba stated this loan program has been publicized in the city newsletter. Mr. Robinson stated with this loan program in place strictly for energy improvements at a lower rate, a]ready monitored, it didn't appear like the Energy Commission would need to get involved. If the City wants to get involved w9th the MHFA Local Participation Program for just hane improvements, that was another issue. ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 24. 1984 ___ _ PAGE 3 Mr, Saha asked Staff to find out how long the non-local participation program was going to remain in existe�ce. Maybe Staff coutd also ask for some more information on tfie program. 3. OUTLINE OF 1984 WORK PROGRAM: Mr. Robinson stated he did get the information from the Dept. of Energy on their new rules and regulations for residential rental property. Mr. Thanpson stated one thing he noticed about these rules is they always deal with things that need to be done to prevent heat loss such as weather- stripping. but it never addresses things like a faulty valve. Why spend money to weatherstrip and then have people open their windows because the valve doesn't work rig6t? Mr, Saba stated these new rules and regulations wi11 be helpful i�formation for any modifications the Commission might want to make to the Housing Maintenance Code. Mr. Robinson stated that, regarding the CO monitor, he had talked to Bob Aldrich, fridley Fire Chief, and Mr. Atdrich stated he would be willing to monitor the loaning out of any device the Comnission purchased. Now it was just a matter of the Commission deciding which device they want to purchase. Mr. Saba stated this is sanething they can put in the work plan and move ahead on fairly quickiy. Mr. Sielaff stated he would like to include s�ething in the work plan about encouraging the schoals to ]ook at energy conservation. Mr, Robinson stated he would draft the work plan as it has been put together so far, ADJOURNMENT: MO.^ZON BY HR, SIELAFF, SECONDED BY AIIt. THOI�SON� TO ADJOURN THE MEETIPIG. UPON A 1'OSCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAZRPERSON SABA DECLARED THE APRSL 24, 2984, ENERGY COPLNZSSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:18 P.M. Respectfully subm'tted, �1 t yn e. Saba Recording Secretary � '' � r CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 9, 1984 CALL TO ORDER: Chairwoman Schnabel called the May 9, 1984, Planning Comnission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Ms. Schnabel, Mr, Oquist, Ms. Gabel, Mr. 5vanda, Mr. Minton, Mr. Kondrick, Mr. Saba Members Absent: None Others Present: Jim Robinson, Planning Specialist Michael Malone, 635 Ely St. Mr. & Mrs. Edward Andrajack, 5832 - 3rd St. N.E. Robert De Gardner, 1438 N. Danube Rd. Maynard Nielson, 7144 Riverview Terrace David Radabough, Woodcrest Baptist Church Gary Braam, 1441 Rice Creek Rd. (See attached lists) APPROVAL OF APRIL 18, 1984, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: h10SION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. OQUI5T, TO APPROVE THE AP.RIL 18� 19$4� pLANNING COMMISSION MINL'TES A5 WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL�VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 1. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #84-05, BY E: er Section 05 .4.� e Frh�i Tiey City Code, o a ow t e construction of a 16 ft. by 22 ft. addition to an existing structure in CRP-2 zoning (flood fringe) on Lots 5, 6, 7, and 8, Block U, Riverview Heighis, the same being 635 Ely Street N.E, MpTION BY MR, KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. SA$A� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SP N84-OS BY MICHAEL J. MALONE. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:32 P,M. Mr. Robinson stated the property was on Ely St, just east of the river. He stated because the proposed addition is in the flood fringe, a special use permit is required. In order to build the addition, the petitioner must be 1.2 ft. above the 100 yr, flood plain. The 100 yr, flood plain is 823.25, and the petitioner has indicated he would have no problem meeting PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAV 9 1984 PAGE 2 that elevation. Mr, Robinson stated the e7evation of the street access needs to be within 2 ft. of this required flood plain elevation. That is grandfathered in at a lesser elevation and, essentially, the City will be granting a variance for that. Ms. Schnabel asked the petitioner if he would like to make any comments. Mr. Michael Malone stated the entry is in the northwest corner which would be 823.19 ft. The step into the house is 7 inches above that. at 830.19 ft. He stated if that was not high enough, they would go with another 1 ft. course of blocks, bringing the height of the floor up to 842.19. That was weli above what was specified. Mr. Malone stated the addition will be in redwood siding, and all facia of the house will be replaced with redwood so it will tie the existing structure in with the new addition. Mr. Robinson stated there is also an 18-inch crawl space that shvu7d be figured into the elevations. He stated that if the Planning Commission approves this special use permit, more accurate drawings of the floor ele- vations should be obtained before this goes to the City Council. MOTION BY MR. SRBA� SECONDED BY MR. MINTON� TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SP #84—OS BY MICHREL J. MALONE, UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC H&elRING CLOSED AT 7:45 P.M. MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MR. MINTON, TO RECOd1MEND � CITY COUNCZL APPROVAL OF REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT� SP �I84—O5, BY MICHAEL J. MALONE, PER SECTION 205,24.4� D� OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE� TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTZON OF A 16 FT. BY 22 FT. ADDITION TO AN EXISTING STRUCSURE IN CRP-2 ZONING (FLOOD FRINGE) ON LOSS 5, 6� 7� AND 8, BLOCK U, RZVERVIEW HEIGHTS� THE SAME BEING 635 ELY SSREET N.E., WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THE PETITZONER MEES THE ELEVATIONS FOR THE FLpOD PLAIN AREA. UPON A VOICE�VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMd1N SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated this item would go to City Councii on May 21, 1984. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP 3iII4-06 BY EDWARD ANDRAJACK: Per Section 205.07.1, 3, A of the Fri ley City Code, to allow the construction of a second accessory building, a 22 ft, by 24 ft. detached garage, on Lots 7 and 8, Block 22, Hyde Park, the same being 5832 3rd Street N.E. MOTION BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON 5P #84-06 BY EDWARD ANDRAJACK. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHRIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARZNG OPEN RT 7:48 p.M. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 9. 1984 PAGE 3 Mr. Robinson stated this property was located on 3rd St. north of 58th Ave. Mr. Andrajack was proposing a second accessory bui7ding, the first one being an attached garage. The second accessory building will be located in the rear yard. It would be approx. 528 sq. ft. with a 3 ft, side yard setback and a 5 ft. rear yard setback. This meets city code. He stated the only requirement would be that the driveway up to the new gara9e be paved, Ms. Schnabel asked the petitioner, Mr. Andrajack, if he had any comments to make regarding his request. Mr. Andrajack stated he had no problem with paving the driveway. He stated the only change to his request was the width of the garage from 22 ft. to 20 ft. He stated they will continue to use the existing attached gara9e as a garage. MOTION BY MR. SABA� SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA� TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARZNG ON SP N84-06 BY EDWRRD ANDRAJACK. UPON R VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN 5CHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED RT 7:55 P.M. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA, TD RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT� SP �84-06� BY EDWARD ANDRAJACK� PER SECTION 205.07.1� 3� A OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE� TO ALIAW THE CONSTRUC- TION OF A SECOND ACCESSORY BUILDING� R 20 FT. BY 24 FT. DETACHED GRRAGE� ON LOTS 7 AND 8� BLOCK 22� HYDE PARK� THE SAME BEING 5832 3RD STREET N.E., WITH THE STIPULATION TXAT THE DRIVEWAY TO THE NEW STRUCTURE BE PAVED. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRYJOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANSMOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated this item would go to City Council on May 21, 1984. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING RE UEST ZOA #84-02, BY ROBERT D. DEGARDNER: Kezone from R- one �ami y we ings to R-3 general mu�Te �lings) part of Lots 3 and 21, not taken for street purposes, and all of Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, and Lots 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20, Block 20, Fridley Park; and parts of Lots 3 and 24, not taken for street purposes, and all of Lots 4, 5, 6, and 7 and 19,_20, 21, 22 and 23, Block 19, Fridley Park, to allow the development of a 52-unit condominium complex between East River Road and Ashton Avenue on 61st and 61 1/2 Way N.E. MOTION BY MR, KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC XEARING ON ZOA N84-02 BY ROBERT D. DEGARDNER. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEt1RZNG OPEN AT 7:58 P.M. PLANNIF�G COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 9, 1984 PAGE 4 Mr. Robinson stated the property was bordered on the south by 61st Ave., Ashton on the east, East River Road on the west, and 62nd Way on the north. The pr��rerty is surrounded by railroad property on the east, light industrial on the south, Stevenson School on the southwest, and single family. The rezoning request is for a change from R-1 to R-3. Mr. Robinson stated the reason for the rezoning to R-3 was for the creation of 13 four-plex type units (one-bedroom Loft Homes) attached at the corners. There would be a central green space, also green space surrounding the buildings, with parking. Ms. Schnabel asked how wide the lots were in this area. The petitioner, Mr. Robert DeG�rdner stated these are 40 ft. lots. They would have to put two toge�her to make one buildable lot. Mr. DeGardner stated he has lived in Fridley for 16 years and has built about 25 homes in Fridley over the years. He stated Mr. Maynard Nielson owns the property, and Mr. Nielson asked his opinion about this property. Mr. DeGardner stated he looked at the site and felt the property was not feasible for single family homes with light industrial, the railr�ad tracks, and so�e poor soil conditions. Mr. DeGardner stated he currently has three quad projects in Coon Rapids. He is proposing the Loft Home concept for this site. Loft Homes caters to single people and couples. It is a total7y new concept. He stated the buildings are conriected at the corners.to make a nice garden apartment. Every apartment is ground level with patios, quality built, oak woodwork throughout, air conditioning, all appliances, and very affordable at $39,900. Mr. DeGardner stated that in looking at the site, he felt this was the most practical way to develop it. These buildings would make a nice buffer between the light industrial and the single family. Mr. Kondrick asked what the square footage was for each apartment. Mr. DeGardner stated each apartment was a little over 600 sq, ft. overall, which included a 16' x i2'loft bedroom which is open to the living room. Ms. Gabel asked if Mr. DeGardner would sell a block of these apartments to an investor who would rent out the units. Mr. DeGardner stated if they get VA financing,tiiey are limited to 5q. He stated they should have no prob7em selling the units individually. There are investors who would like to buy these blocks, but the units would be rentals and there would be an association so it would not be like other apartment rentals. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 9, 1984 PAGE 5 Ms. Schnabel stated she did visit the Loft Homes in Coon Rapids and spent some time with the salesman there. From what the salesman told her, this last weekend there was an open house and about 150 people cane out. Of those people who had children, they all turned away, as they did not feel the uniis were appropriate for families. The salesman said that of the units that were up, all were sold but two and he expected to se71 them soon. Then the second phase of construction would start. Most of the people buying these units are single people rather than couples. Ms. Schnabe] stated the units were very attractive and appeared to be of good quality. The salesman stated the monthly maintenance fee the first year would be $23/month and $28/month the second year. Each unit contained a stove, refrigerator, dishwasher, garbage disposal, washer/dryer/ 30 gal. hot water heater, insulation acceptable in terms of R value, electric heat, with heat efficient fireplace. There was a lot of selection in terms of carpeting, tile, etc. Ms. Schnabel asked if there was anyone in the audience who would iike to make any comments about this rezoning request. Mr. Larry Newhorter, 32 - 62nd Lane, stated he has lived across the street from this property for 11 years. He stated when 61st and the stop light by Stevenson School were put in, the area was filled with concrete. When Park Construction was digging up I-94, they dumped in clay, mud and concrete. He did not know how Mr. DeGardner could build on this property with all the clay and concrete in there. Mr. Newhorter stated this property was zoned R-1 when he moved in 11 years ago, and he did not want any multiples across the street. He was also con- cerned about the height of the units. They would not match with the houses in the area. He stated these units are built for 1-2 people, but he could easily see a couple with a child living there. He would like to see single family homes on the property. In digging footings for a house with a base- ment, they would probably hit sand, but he did not know if they could lay a slab on top of the peat. Mr. Richard Soj, 65 - 612 Way N.E., stated he has 7ived in his home for 21 years. He stated he has a walkout basement on the east side of his house. His concern was drainage into his yard and basement if this develop- ment went in. He also felt these buildings were too high to have across the street from residentia7. Ms. Schnabel stated any project that is developed is designed to contain water within its own development, so there should not be any drainage onto any other property. Ms. Betty Rae Berkholz, 6103 East River Road, stated she was concerned about the children. She felt that when there are single people living in a home, they are probably going to have parties. She stated this is a quiet neigh- borhood, and she would feel very uncomfortable because they do not know what kind of element would be moving in. She also felt there would bz a considerable amount of turnover of ownership of these units as people get married and move to larger homes. ING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 9, 1984 PAGE 6 Mr, Ed Ksolihowski, 35 - 62nd Way N.E., stated he owns 32 lots here. He stated he was against the project, and would like to have single family homes on this property. Mr. DeGardner stated that whether multi or single family homes are built on this site, there will have to be soil preparation. He felt single family homes were out of the question for the reasons mentioned earlier. With multi, they can get more units per acre; therefore, they can afford to do some soil preparation. As far as drainage, they will work closely with the people and the City to handle the drainage on site. He stated he would be �lling to sit down with the neighbors to try to resolve the concerns expressed by the neighbors. Mr. Minton asked how long Mr. Nie7son had owned the property and if he had attempted to deve]op the property before. Mr. Nielson stated he has owned the property for 7 years. He stated he had considered doubles and single family homes, but because of the financial situation, these have not worked out for him. When he met with Mr. DeGardner, they both felt this was the best plan for the property. Mr. Robinson stated if the property was rezoned to R-3, Mr, DeGardner would 6e allowed 20% lot coverage. The proposed plan is for 76� lot coverage. He would need a minimum of 35% green space, and the proposed plan calls for 56% green space. Mr. Robinson stated one concern would be that this proposed plan is not consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. If the Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning, the Comprehensive Plan would have to be amended through the Metropolitan Council. Mr. Oquist asked about a garage requirement. Mr. Robinson stated the code does not require garages for apartment buildings. The City does require 12 stalls per one bedroom unit. Mr. DeGardner stated garages can be provided if people want one, so those options can be built into the plan. MOTION BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO CLOSE THE PUBLZC HEARING ON ZOR #84-02 BY ROBERT D. DEGARDNER. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HERRING CLOSED AT 9:00 P.M. Ms. Gabel stated she was concerned about the density. Mr. Oquist stated he was also concerned about the density and the type of project this is. He stated a good point was made by one of the neighbors that single people do have a tendency to have parties. It could become a problem area. He stated it was fine to have low to moderate income housing PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 9, 1984 PAGE 7 for singles, but the City also needs to be considering low to moderate income housing for families. This is not a family development, so he did not think the low to moderate income was a positive issue here. Mr. Saba stated development did concept was very not here. he thought traffic was an issue. He really felt this not fit into this neighborhood. He stated the Loft Home interesting and it may fit very well somewhere else, but MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL DENIAL OF REZONZNG REQUEST� ZOR 1i84-02� BY ROBERT D. DEGARDNER� TO REZONE FROM R-.2 (ONE�FAMILY DWELLINGSJ TO R-3 (GENERAL hRILTIPLE DWELLINGS) PART OF LOTS 3 AND ZZ� NOT TAKEN FOR STREET PURPOSES� AND ALL OF LOTS 4� 5� 6� 7� 8� 9, AND 10� AND LOTS 24, IS, 16� 17� 28� S9 AND 20� BLOCK 20� FRIDLEY PARK; AND PARTS OF LOTS 3 AND 24� NOT TAKEN FOR STREET PURPOSES� AND ALL OF LOTS 4, 5� 6� AND 7 AND Z9, 20� 21� 22 AND 23� BLOCK Z9� FRIDLEY PARK� TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 52-UNIT CONDOMINZUM COMPLEX BETD7E'EN EAST RZVER ROAD AND ASHTON AVENUE ON 62ST AND 61 I/2 WAY N.E. Ms. Schnabel stated she also thought the concept of this development was excellent, and she commended Mr. DeGardner for bringing it to the City of Fridley; however, she also felt this was the wrong area for this type of development. In the proper location, this type of development made very nice homes for people with certain needs. She stated she was very impressed with the units when she saw them in Coon Rapids. UPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTIIJG AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARV PLAT, P.S. #84-03, LOFT D , ER D. D G D R: eing a Rep at of parts of ots an 24, not taken for street purposes and Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 29, 20, 21, 22 and 23, Block 19, Fridley Park; and parts of Lot 3 and 21, not taken for street purposes, and al] of Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20, Block 20, Fridley Park, to allow the development of a 13 4-unit condominium complex between Ashton Avenue and East River Road on 61st and 61 1/2 Way N.E. MOTION BY MS, GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON P.S. i�84-03 BY ROBERT D. DEGARDNER. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARSNG OPEN AT 9:05 P.M. Mr. Robinson stated they are basically talking about two parcels of land-- 3.08 acres combined. The proposal_is for eight 4-unit garden Loft Home apartments on the southerly portion and five 4-unit garden Loft Home apart- ments on the northerly portion. Mr. Robinson stated Siaff's 6iggest concern was the lot coverage. Because it is a difference concept, it does not quite fit into anything they have in the Zoning Code in terms of interpretation, If these were considered 4- PLANNING COMMISSION MEETIN6, MAY 9, 1984 PAGE 8 plexes, they would have to have 15,000 sq, ft, of lot per 4-plex. As such, the southerly portion would only aliow for five units as opposed to the eight being proposed, The northerly portion would allow for three units as oppoed to the five being proposed, for a total of eight (13 being proposed). Mr. Robinson stated Mr. DeGardner feels these are not 4-plexes, but are garden-type apartment dwellings. If this was a townhouse development which would fit under a special single family district, he would be required to have five acres. With that, if it was rezoned to R-3, he could build 3,000 sq. ft, per unit or 12,000 sq. ft, per 4-plex. On the southerly portion, he would be al7owed six units as opposed to eight. On the northerly portion, he would be allowed four units as opposed to five, for a total of ten. Mr. Robinson stated that if these units are considered apartments, since they are attached, he would 6e allowed to build as proposed, 2,500 sq. ft, per unit or 10,000 sq. ft. per 4-plex for 8 units on the south and 5 on the north. Mr. Robinson stated City Staff felt it was really a townhouse-type develop- ment and, as such, should follow the townhouse density which is 12,000 sq. ft. with a variance to allow for the new concept. Mr. Robinson stated Staff had some concerns on parking as laid out in the proposal. The petitioner shows 9 ft. stalls. The City requires 10 ft. stalls. The petitioner meets the minimum amount of parking stalls, but thev are substandard and they would have to rework the parking with additional setback requirements. Mr. Robinson stated another Staff concern was the petitioner needs a 15 ft, buffer space Detween the hard surface area and the adjacent R-1 zoning. Presently, only 5 ft. of buffer space is shown. Mr. Robinson stated a concern expressed by Engineering was that Ashton Ave. may require additional easement for possible widening if this project progressed. That was something that was not clearly defined at this point. Ms. Schnabe7 asked if the sewer and water were adequate for a development of this type. Mr. Robinson stated he believed that because of the industrial zoning nearby, that the water and sewer were sufficient to handle a development of this type. However, this was something the Engineering Dept. should check into. Mr. DeGardner stated that when he first brought this concept to Coon Rapids, they expressed the same concerns being expressed at this meeting--whether it is a 4-plex or townhouse development. After discussions and looking at the concept, the Coon Rapids Planning. Commission concurred that this concept PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 9, 1984 PA6E 9 was far superior to the box-type apartments. He stated this concept meets all codes. Ms, Schnabel stated that where the Loft Homes are located in Coon Rapids, it is a much more open area, and there isn't any residential around it like there is in Fridley. She felt there was a big difference between the two sites. �s. Gabel stated she did go to Coon Rapids to look at the development there. She, too, liked the concept, but did not think it was correct for this piece of property. Mr. Saba asked about the storage of a boat, tent trailer, etc. Mr. DeGardner stated the owners can have 1-2 garages built if they want. The code requires 12 stalls per unit for parking. If an �wner has a boat, it is usually stored off the property. The association would regulate such things as outside storage, parties, etc., so these units would be self- governing. Actually there is more control than there is with single family homes. Mr. Minton asked about the height of the buildings since that seemed to be a concern expressed by the neighbors. Mr. DeGardner stated each unit was a 2-story unit with a peak. It would be similar to an expansion-type house with a peak. He would guess the height at the peak was 26-28 ft. Mr. Robinson stated the limit on height in R-1 zoning is 30 ft. MOTION BY MR, KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. MINTON� TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON P.S. �84-03 BY ROBERT D. DEGARDNER. UPON A VOICE VOTE, RLL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED SHE PUBLIC HEARING CLQSED AT 9:25 P.M. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. SABR, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUP7CIL DENIAL OF CON52DERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT� P.S. #84-03� IAFT HOMES OF FRIDLEY� BY ROBEAT D. DEGARDNER� HEING A REPLAT OF PARTS OF LOTS 3 AND 24, NOT TAKEN FOR STREET PURPOSES AND IAS5 4� 5� 6� 7� 29, 20� 22� 22 AND 23� BIACK 19� FRIDLEY PARK; AND PARTS OF LOT 3 AND 21� NOT TRKEN FOR STREET PURPOSES, AND ALL OF LOTS 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14, 15, S6, I7, 28� Z9 AND 20, BZqCK 20� FRIDLEY PARK� TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 13 4-Ul7IT CONDO - MINIUM COMPLEX BETG7EEN ASHTON AVENUE AND EAST RIVER ROAD ON 6SST AND 6.2 1/2 WAY N.E.� FOR THE FOLLOWZNG REASOl7S: � 2. THE PROPOSED PLAN IS NOT CONBZSTENT WITH THE CITY�S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. 2. THE DENSITY� AS PROP0.SED� IS TOO HIGH FOR THIS AREA. 3. CONCERN ABOUT AN INVESTOR BUYING BUILDINGS FOR RENTRL� CREATING PROBLEMS FOR THE NEIGHBORS. 4. DRRINAGE BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE AREA WHERE POOR SOIL CONDITIONS EXIST. 5. CONCERN AS TO WHETHER WATER AND SEWER LINES ARE ADEQUATE. 6. PARKING STALLS DD NOT MEET ZONING ORDIl7ANCE. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 9. 1984 7. BUFFER AREA BETWEEN R-I AND DEVELOPMENT SHOULD BE LARGER. 8. FACT THAT iLSHTON MIGHT HAVE TO BE WIDENED TO RCCOMMODATE ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC GENERATED BY A DEVELOPMENT LIKE THIS. 10 Ms. Schnabel sta�ed she would like either the Planning Commission or one of the member commissions (possibly Community Development Commission) take a look at a new definition for a condominium/apartment development with density figures and come up with some recommendations. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOU5LY, Ms. Schnabel stated both the rezoning request and the preliminary plat request would go together as a package to the City Council, She suggested the petitioner call the Planning Department to verify the date when this would go to City Council. 5. PUBLIC HEARING: REOUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SP #84- �Hri15i Ct1UK�H: N21' �ection zu5.uy, I, 3, A, ot tne rridley clty Cone, to a ow-li t�nstruction of a multi-purpose gymnasium type building on Outlot 1, Holiday Hills Second Addition, the same being 6875 University Avenue N.E. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. SRBA� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SP N84-07 BY WOODCREST BAPTIST CHURCH, UPON A VOICE VQTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED SHE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 9:35 P.M. Mr. Robinson stated Woodcrest Baptist Church was located north of Rice Creek, east of University, and south of 69th Ave. The property was surrounded by Columbia Arena on the north, R-1 on the east south and west. He stated the proposed multi-purpose gymnasium building would be located just south of the existing school and church and would be over 11,000 sq, ft. Mr. Robinson stated that in a church area, whenever a church does any development, it requires a special use permit. In trying to fit a church into different zoning areas they use CR-1 zoning, so a 30 ft. setback was required from the neighborhing residential. Otherwise, the church meets all the other setback requirements with the exception of the driveway which should be setback from the right of way 20 feet, but is only 15 feet. Mr. Robinson stated another concern looked at by Staff was the parking. The present lot has 272 stalls. The new addition would require 96 stalls with 8,700 sq. ft. of gathering area and 2,200 sq. ft. in locl�er and shower area. The existing school, using a 1-250 ratio, requires 67 stalls. The existing church, using a ratio of 1- 100 stalls (10,800 sq, ft.), requires 108 stalls. The total parking stalls required is 271, so there is adequate parking even with the new gymnasium. Mr. Robinson stated the petitioner has indicated that the gymnasium would not actually be an additional parking burden to the complex and typically PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 9, 1984 PAGE 11 would not be used at the same time as the church activities. They have indicated the parking lot has never been full to overflowing, and this development would not increase the parking demand. Ms. Schnabel asked about the height of the proposed gymnasium. Mr. Dave Radabough stated he was Chairman of the Building CoRUnittee for Woodcrest Baptist Church. He stated the height of the building from the floor level to where tne roof starts is 21 ft. from that point to the peak is approximately 9 ft. more. He stated it would be approximately the same height as the present auditorium the gymnasium will be parallel to. The back of the school is flat on top and is approx. 21 ft. Mr. Oquist asked about Rice Creek Watershed Board approval. Mr. Radabough stated they have 9otten approval from the Rice Creek Water- shed Board. Although they did not have to, they considered the existing parking lot, as well as the existing building, in their flow into Rice Creek. They designed a flow restriction area as well as a skimming area to take care of anything that would go into the Creek. Mr. Radabough stated the initial building was built in 1964, and the school was added in 1975. At this time, they are proposing the construction of a gymnasium to support the existing school, The reason they desire this addition is because they have to transport the children by bus to other gymaasiums they rent for their Phy. Ed, and other programs. At these gyms, they do not have the use of showers which is important. He stated they make a lot of noise transporting the children back and forth; also there is the added risk of transporting the children. With the temperature changes from the gymnasiums back to the bus and from the bus into the school, especially during the cold winters, they have to consider the health of the children. Mr. Radabough stated they will be able to go from the church into the pro- posed gymnasium so there will be a quiet entry into the gymnasium. By having this facility, it would eliminate bussing, there would be less risk to the children and to the children's health. Mr. Radabough stated the gymnasium would also be used for recess time. Right now, 2-3 times a day, the children go out on the parking lot. In the winter time, they have recess in a 30 ft, by 60 ft. cafeteria/recess room, and this is not adequate. Mr. Radabough stated they are also proposing an apartment above the locker room. The apartment would be used to house missionaries or other pastors and families, on a temporary basis. Mr. Kondrick asked how many students attended Woodcrest School. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 9, 1984 PAGE 12 Mr. Chrisman, Principal of Woodcrest Baptist Academy, 271 - 67th Ave., stated they have approximately 147 students in the school Pre K- 12. Ms, Schnabel asked if there was anyone in the audience who would like to comment on this proposal. Mrs. Bev Eberhard, 436 Rice Creek Blvd., stated she was very concerned about the large size of the proposed structure, because the only view from the back of their home would be the side of this building. Mr. Dean Eberhard, 436 Rice Creek Blvd., stated he would like to submit to the Planning Commi-sion a petition of approximately 80 signatures of people opposing the construction of a gymnasium at Woodcrest Baptist Church. He stated he would like to address sane of the major concerns expressed by the neighbors: 1. The traffic in the area. They are concerned that the gymnasium wiil increase the traffic due to expanded programs of the schooi and church. At the present time, traffic is a concern with activities at Columbia Arena, the parks, the athletic fields, and the church. There is no alternate route into their neighborhood; there is only one way in and one way out, and this also pertains to the egress and access to the parking lot at Woodcrest Baptist Church. They are particularly concerned about the traffic during the evening hours and the activities that might occur at that time. 2. The safety of the children and the residents in the area, because they do have access to the park at the end of the block. 3. They are concerned about the noise levels because of increased traffic and the noise level of any athletic activities going on at the school. 4. Playground activities. The on7y playground area the church does have is the park area, and the neighbors are concerned about the requirements on public parks. 5. Future expansion of the church. They are wondering where this expansion will take place in the future as enrollment and/or membership in the church increases. It appeared to the residents that the expansion would have to either be by building up.on the existing educational building or acquiring property to the east which is residential. 6. The aesthetics. They feel the structure will give a warehouse-type atmosphere to the neighborhood. It will block out the view they now have and a few hours of sunlight in the afternoon. Will there be heating elements on the roof? Will these be aesthetically detractive to the property? 7. They are concerned that the use of the gymnasium will be for other groups. As a result, it will increase traffic flow and activities at the church. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 9, 1984 PAGE 13 8. Does the apartment dwelling require some special zoning? Mr. Eberhard stated that as a homeowner, he is concerned about the view they will have from their home. They bought their home in 1968 and purchased the home because of the view they have of Rice Creek. They are concerned about whether this structure will affect the market value of their home if they were to sell. MOTZOI] BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. MINTON� TO RECEIVE PETITION NO. 6-84, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. DuWayne Bakke, 454 Rice Creek Blvd „ stated he was concerned about the traffic, traffic congestion, the warehouse effect of the new structure, and possible future expansion of the church and school. He stated the church has only one entrance and one exit. In the evening hours and sometimes during the day, when activities are getting out, there is an enormous amount of traffic congestion in the parking lot. When activities are going on at the church and Columbia Arena at the same time, the cars really stack up at the intersection. He was also concerned for the safety of the children walking or biking to the park. Mr. Bakke stated the church will 6e using the last green area they have for this gymnasium, so that means some of the playground area wi71 move up into the fridley public park. As a property owner, he had a problem with the school using the park as a playground, because when the school children come into the park, the rest of the neighbors move off. He stated he recently received a letter from the church apo7ogizing for them forcing the residents off the park. Mr. Bakke stated there are 147 students at the school. According to informa- tion he was given, 90q of those students are non-Fridley residents. Mr. Jerry Ulvin, 449 Rice Creek Blvd., stated to put the size of this new gymnasium in perspective, it would be aery close in size to City Hall. Did the Planning Commission feel a warehouse-type building of this size would be appropriate along Rice Creek? Mr. Radabough stated that regarding the concern that the new structure would generate more traffic, they will not be changing the flow of traffic from what is now. Ms. Schnabel asked about the school`s enrollment capacity, Mr. Chrisman stated the capacity was about 200. Ms. Schnabel asked about church membership. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 9 1984 PAGE 14 Mr. Radabought stated they have 180-200 members; however, on a 5unday morning they average around 500 and have had some special times when the attendance is up to 900. They would never use the church and hold athletic events at the same time. Ms. Margaret Maeckelbergh, 425 Rice Creek Blvd., asked if a stage would be included in this new gymnasium. Mr. Radabough stated they are putting in a platform for a stage. They have one big play a year. Mr. Chrisman stated that 39 out of the 147 students are residents of Fridley. Eight of the 11 faculty members are residents of Fridley, so that equals more than 10% who are residents of the City. Mr. Chrisman stated that in all the activities he has been involved in in the four years he has been at Woodcrest and in the State of Minnesota, he has never attended a Christian school sporting event or dramatic event that drew in excess of what the church normally draws on a Sunday. Ms. Pat Johanson, 424 Rice Creek Blvd., stated their back yard backs up to the church's property. They have seen as many as a dozen buses from all over, and that is without a gymnasium. With a gymnasium, she did not know what it would be like when they have competitive sports. She was concerned about what type of air conditioning or heating units would go on the roof. Right now there is an unsightly green metal unit on the roof. Mr. Chrisman stated the church has ten bus routes on Sunday morning to pick up children in the community for Sunday School. But, that is something that is going on right now without the gymnasium. There will be no activity taking place in the gymnasium that will equal what they are already doing now on Sunday or any other night of the week. Mr. Radabough st�ted he did not know about a green metal roof unit, but he would be happy to talk to the neighbors and do something to make it look better. He stated they will not have any air conditioning units on the outside at all. It will strictly be a ventilation system for cooling. Mr. Quentin Freeburg, 301 Rice Creek Terrace, stated they live across the Creek from the church. They have lived in their home for approximately ten years. Their view of the current structures, as well as the proposed structure, is from their living room and dining room windows. He stated it appears the church has made an effort to try to get materials that blend in with the existing structures as well as the habitat. He stated they have no objection to the new gymnasium. He stated he would like to read a letter from a neighbor who could not be at the meeting. The letter was from Dr. David Zeigler, 315 Rice Creek Terrace, which stated they did not feel the proposed gymnasium would affect them and were not opposed to the building. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 9. 1984 PAGE 15 Mr, Freeburg stated they have been members of Woodcrest Baptist Church for 9 years and have two children who attend the school. One of the things that drew them to the church were the activities and that the activities were not upsetting to the community. They would like to see the proposed gymnasium built as a supportive function to the school. Ms. Sharon Gustafson, 437 Rice Creek Blvd., stated she would like to address the aesthetics. She was sure the Planning Commission was aware of parts of the City that have not been planned very well. She stated this area is highly visible from Highway 47, and she felt the proposed gymnasium would be very detrimental to the look of the neighborhood and to the community itself. Mr. Roger Reed, 290 Rice Creek Blvd., stated he was directly across from the existing building and the proposed construction. He has lived in this location for seven years. He felt the church has maintained its building well. He felt the church was an asset to the community, and he did not feel it detracted from his property in any way. He stated he is a member of Woodcrest Baptist Church and chose to live in this location to be near the church. He felt the gymnasium was really needed for the children. Mr. George Lunde, 545 Rice Creek Blvd., stated he and his family are new- comers to Fridley. They are also members of Woodcrest Baptist Church. They joined the church about one y�ar ago. They were living in White Bear Lake and decided to move into Fridley to locate relatively near the church. They decided on their home because it is a very nice neighborhood and is secluded. It is near University Ave., and he felt the church property formed a very good buffer between the residential area and University Ave. fie stated he felt the value of property is really determined by the buyers coming in. If he was moving in again and the gymnasium was already there, he would still have moved into the neighborhood. Ms. Lana Freeburg, 301 Rice Creek Terrace, stated that in reference to the cornnents about the people being aesthetically affected by the building, she did not understand how the neighbors could present a petition with 80 signatures when 80 homes are not even close to the property. She could understand the concern by some people regarding the traffic, but she would hate that to be the only excuse when there is already a significant amount of traffic from, not only the church and school, 6ut Columbia Arena, the park, and the new ballfields. The traffic lights could be timed so the traffic can move through a little more quickly. She stated they have small children, and they do use the facilities at the park. The reason the church uses the park facilities is because they do not have facilities on their property. If the gymnasium was bui7t, they would have their activities in their own building. Mr. G. DeShaw, 530 Rice Creek Blvd., stated this is one of the most unique neighborhoods in fridley. It has the lowest crime rate in Fridley. It is buffered by Locke Park, Rice Cree, and University Ave. There is only one way in and one way out.. They are concerned about everything that happens in their neighborhood. He stated the people have an honest concern about their property values, because this is a warehouse-type building going in. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 9, 1984 PAGE 16 Pastor Clark Poorman stated he has been the pastor at Woodcrest for 14 years. The school was established in 1973. With rare excaption, he felt the young people have proven themselves well disciplined and there have been few incidents. When the educational wing was built in 1973, being new to the church and not knowing all the details, they did not check with the neighbors. They tried to make a number of concessions to try to maintain a good rapport with the neighbors. They want to continue that good rapport. They want to do something about the unsightly rooftop unit that was mentioned by one of the neighbors, but there isn't much that can be done to dress up a gymnasium- type building. He stated he appreciated the concerns of the neighbors. If he were a property owner on that street, he would also be concerned. He stated he hoped the Planning Comnission realized the church was willing to do every- thing they can to be amiable to their neighbors and hopefully this will not mean ceasing to put up something they desperately need. Ms. Schnabel stated she felt there was a real need for communication between the church and the neighbors. She would encourage the two qroups to get together and discuss this proposal. MOTION BY MR. SRBA� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO CL0.SE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SP }184-07 BY WOODCREST BAPTIST CHURCH. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOSING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED SHE PUBLIC HEARING CIASED AT I1:.Z2 P.M. Mr. Saba stated that in looking at the needs, benefits, and detriments, he felt the need for a gymansium took precedent. He did not think there would be any traffic problems because of the new structure. He sympathized with tlie aesthetic concerns, but this is a CR-1 zone and a lot can go in a CR-1 zone. Mr. Svanda stated he did not necessar9ly agree that the traffic was not an issue--perhaps with regard to safety. He did not like the warehouse-barn effect. He would not like to have a building like this 30 ft. from his home, and he was not in favor of the proposal. Ms. Gabel stated it seemed traffic was an issue in terms of health, safety, and welfare of the people, but aesthetics was not and had nothing to do in terms of the burden of proof, Mr. Kondrick stated he agreed that aesthetics was not a good enough reason to deny this special use permit. He did not think traffic was an issue because he did not feel the traffic would be any different than it is now. He would prefer to have the children in the gymnasium than in the parking lot. Mr. Oquist stated he also did not think there would be an increase in traffic because of the gymnasium. He sympathized because of the aesthetics, but Ms. Gabel had brought up a good point, and he was not so sure the Planning CorrQnission could deny the special use permit because of the reasons that have been brought up. PLANNING COMMISSIOIJ MEETING, MAY 9, 1984 PAGE 17 Mr. Minton stated he agreed that the traffic was not a big issue. He felt that if the congregation has a need for a gymnasium which they have obviously demonstrated, the Planning Commission should make every accomo- dation they can to allow for that. There were two issues he would like clarified before he could vote on this: (1) The aesthetics. He felt that was a real issue that possib7y could be worked out with the neighbors and the church, He felt there were a number of possibilities there. (2) The temporary living quarters. Is there any special zoning for that? Ms, Schnabel stated she was sharing some of the same feelings in terms of traffic. She did not see that as an added detriment. She thought the biggest traffic problems were being generated by the church activities, services, special events, etc. She was concerned about the aesthetics and was not comfortable with the desi9n of the addition. She asked about the feasibility of sinking the building a few feet into the ground. Mr. Wayne Tower, Suburban Engineering, stated that to sink the structure into the ground was nearly impossible because of the elevation of the existing sanitary sewer. In order for the showers and the toilet facilities to function in that building, he did not believe they could push that building down to any degree to make any reasonable effect on the site. �4s. Schnabel stated she did think there were some other options that needed to be explored. She did not see a cohesive plan that shows exactly what is being done, and no landscaping plan has been proposed. Both representatives from Woodcrest Baptist Church and the neighbors stated they would be willing to get together and discuss this before it goes to City Council. The neighbors stated they had been totally unaware of this proposal until about 8-10 days ago when they received the public hearing notice. MOTION BY MR. OQUIST� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO RECOB9AfEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF REQUEST FOR A SPECSAL USE pERMST, 5P $84-07, BY WDODCREST BApTIST CHURCH, PER 5ECTIDN 205.09.1� 3, A, OF.THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MULTI-PURPOSE GYMfSA.iZUM TYpE BUILDING ON OUTLpT 1� HOLIDAY HILLS SECOND ADDITION� THE SAME BEING 6875 UN�TVERSISY AVENUE N.E.� WITH THE CONCERNS EXPRESSED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS AND WITX T$E RECOMMENDATION THRT THE NEIGHBORS AND REPF2ESENTATIVES OF WOODCREST BAPTIST CHURCH GET TOGETHER FOR DISCUSSIONS BEFORE THIS REQUEST GOES TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THERE BE AN APPRpVED LANDSCAPE PLAN. UPON R VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIR470MAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRTED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms, Schnabe] suggested the petitioner contact the Planning Dept, to verify the date when this would go to City Council. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 9, 1984 PAGE 18 6. LOT SPLIT RE UEST: L.S. #84-04, BY CYNTHIA J. BRAAM: Split off the North T� eet o Lot 6, B�ock 2, Spring Valley Addition, to make a new building site at 1443 Rice Creek Road. (Petitioner knows property is land locked.) Mr. Robinson stated this property was located north of Rice Creek west of Arthur St. It is a very large lot in excess of 37,000 sq. ft. He stated there is no plan for a road at this time, but there are a couple of road easements that have been picked up. Staff has no problem with this request, but one stipulation would be that the lot split is recorded at the County, The petitioner, Gary Braam, stated the lot split was for future development if a road shou7d ever go through, MOTION BY MR. SABA� SECONDED BY hII2. KONDRICK, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST� L.S. #84-04, BY CYNTHIA J. BRAFiM, TO SPLIT OFF THE NORTH I49 FEET OF LOT 6, BLOCK 2, SPRING VALLEY ADDITION, TO MAKE A NEW BUSLDING SITE AT 1443 RICE CREEK RpAD� WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THE LOT SPLIT BE RECORDED AT THE COUNTY. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. SALE OF PUBLIC PROPERTIES PROCEDURE: Mr. Robinson stated that if the Planning Commission concurs with the "Sale of Public Properties Procedure", they will be saying that the sale of these R-1 lots is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that they encourage development of R-1 in R-1 areas. He stated these properties are tax forfeit properties, park dedication properties, etc. He stated Mr. Moravetz indicated these properties would be turned over to realtors and sold. The Commissioners were concerned with Lot 11, Block 20, Fridley Park, as it was not a buildable lot. MOTION BY MR. MINTON� 5ECONDED BY 142. SVANDA� TO CONCUR WITH THE SALE OF PUBLIC PROPERTZES PROCEDURE WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT IF A LOT IS NOT A BUILDABLE LOT� THIS FACT BE MADE KNOWN IN WRITING AT THE TIME OF SALE. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING A�E, CHAIRE�OMAN�SCHNABEL DECIIiRED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 8. RECEIVE APRIL 17, 1984, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. SVANDA, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK� TO RECEIVE THE APRIL .27� Z984, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES. Mr. Svanda recalled from the minutes that he was disappointed that Council had approved the Hazardous Waste Ordinance prior to the Environmental Qualtiy Commission's approval. He stated the E.Q.C. should have been consulted prior to this action as more work needs to be done on the Ordinance. UPON A i70ICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHABEL DECLARED THE P10TION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 9, 1984 PAGE 19 9. RECEIVE APRIL 19 1984 HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. SABA� SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA� TO RECEIVE THE APRZL Z9� 2984� HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT RUTHDRITY MINUTES. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRZED UNANIMOUSLY. 10. RECEIVE APRIL 23 1984 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: M02ION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL, TO RECEIVE THE APRIL 23, I984, PAF2KS & RECREATION COMMISSSON MINUTES. UPON A VOICE [/OTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN�5CHNABEL DECIISRED THE MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 11. RECEIVE APRIL 24, 1984, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. SABR� TO RECEIVE THE APRIL 24� I984� APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTSNG AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNRBEL DECLIlRED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 12. RECEIVE APRIL 24, 1984, ENERGY COMMISSTON MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. 5ABA, SECONDED BY MR. MINTON� TO RECEIVE THE APRSL 24� 1984� EtJERGY COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AS'E� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, OTHER BUSI��ESS: MOTION BY MR, SABA� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO REQUEST THAT ICE WATER AND POSSIBLY COFFEE BE PROVIDED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS AT EACH MEETING. UPON A VOICE T/OTE, ALL POTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOU5LY. AD�OURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA, TO ADJOURN THE MEESING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MAY 9, 1984, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 12:15 A.M. Respectfully submitted, ��, Ly i Saba Recording Secretary 1 Plannin9 �prnmission F1eeting �-�Y 9> 19�4— . Page 20 � �� dj��-r.�<�� . ��_O�t� � r� , � �� / r�y �� re��, . ��.� (`"I/(/�7/,�F1-i\�/., ��p K�`-C-�•C/ya— � S�Cl��E.0 U �� / i ✓�� >��%r-� �� 3 �l -�l� �—. (�J �, '�� ".� ��( �//'/�� U r V G �.� s ��!�/ � �� /� / ��j'/f IY ! i/✓ ✓' �� -�( � �/�/j S/ T 4`� " �/� �J(XX'�� I�� V � G — �D c� °� (1 lk3 C�/r1` ±�A � � U �v �7 Z7 �i/�U�i;L�L�Th �30� � � G� l�%z 3�i G��, ��jy� �� - �� w;� � ��,; . ��^� � � �� t 1� �s-��a :�,� ��.� . � � - 6 � % r�-y� -� ,�. � i .� � ��'� �� C� ,/ �" �,�a� A�. '1L - � /d-G`-k.� �2c.� �� %��dr� 9<�/ ./ �� /�J� �l� �-/�7it, i (�� T 1 �� j1��4��( �� ,�— �3� lG� � /; /�� 1, -T�,P6'6/—`�-°-7� ` �„��.�/ �- ��/lt/-2 ✓ � rPS t�•, r��C �T �7a.r.z �°. �"yS7 �.' u��v; cr�/�,..Q/r/ �� /� =:IrIF, � �� ` � y � (�u� �u� �� nin�ommiss�n�l�9�/i9$.4 Page 21 " � � �� g� / 9� 5' �� , �� <.� �,�,�-��. "Q C�/u �� ,�e ��' �, � � 6/,!✓ �� ✓�-d (� \1; ��'< y� � �� ✓ �'. �� ,��- �� q �i Ir//k-�i� �� . ��4'I—� , CL \� .it��, � d,� � Ct��'�in� ��i� o-�� .�.� , �� . e��.— �c�-v� � � ,_ .��''�� . , _ ;�`�- '� �'La-.. . �� - �� f��, � � ' � ��_ �� '�� , � •J o T h ��f��j �� „ 9 f;�'��-�-� ��, ��,�7 � � �� i e�vr.�'�.v..GV:`� JCk/v✓NLG , "`�llLl.d�-�'-C.�; /� p /� 7`..`�7 s'-��S v�i�7�/P`'/� �� {S`I \\.�e Lfez\� �lv� �.�\e,, S!-�O `� � ��-� .�u��y � � �� 3 C� r�uE, C tiz�,L,. t�'<: �. l�� `f 3 fc I�t,�c, �� ' . ��/%c�L �2 0 /�i,ce� t'�ee� �= fC =�'iu�7/�� 9 , ��-r0 � i Gr CY:�� i�� i2�I�l� � � ��,`� (..%1( �c �!i �� . �.,c� �� s � � i�� y� r� %��- �'�/, �'�� -�� s�� ,�.�� '�� .�.� .� „ yy/ (��- ,�-�-� �, ` �c � ' �yy G�c.c_ C✓�� -z� �� 1 �i.��.- l�..i�.:`.�.� `�� r_�y�L'�_` ''�1,�� '��ei. ��:.+� �.,�� % � � v =� ,!' , �� ;, . ,.^ ,, �. t: �3([r,=�-�l['/ l � � � % �v��-•- ��i'�'� �' /l