The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 07/18/1984 - 6838PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING City of Fridley A G E N D A WEDNESDAY, JULY 18, 1984 CALL TQ ORDER: ROLL CALL: APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: JUNE 20, 19$4 1. TABLED: LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #84-�8, BY DON HANSON: Split off the Southerly 121_ feet of Lot 28, Auditor's Subdivision No. 129, a�1d Qutlot A, Jim Lund Estates, to make a new building site at 1501 73 1/2 Avenue N.E. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #84-12, BY JAMES I. TAYLOR: Per Section 205.14.1, C, 4, OF THE FFidley City Code, to allow a repair garage (Midas Muffler) on Lot l, Block l, University Industrial Park, the same being 8080 University Avenue N.E. 3. � � � CONSIDERATI E PERMIT SP #84-13, MCCK PROPERTIES, INC., �Y UUfV GHUUinNKU: rer Section 205.07.1, 3, E, of the fridley City Code, to allow Lots 78 and 79, Block A, River Heights, zoned R-1 (one family dwellings) to be used for a parking lot and garage to be used in conjunction with a 7-unit multiple dwelling at 441 Hugo Street N.E. Note: Appeals Comnission recommended approval of variances for this parking lot an garage at the July lOth meeting. Both items will go to the August 6th City Council meeting), RECEIVE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: JUNE 7, 1984 RECEIVE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: JUNE 18, 1984 RECEIUE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES: JUNE 19, 7. RECEIVE APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: JUNE 26, 1984 8. RECEIVE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: 9, RECEIVE APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: JULY 10, 1984 10. OTHER BUSINESS: ADJOURNMENT: 7:30 P.M. PAGES 1 - 5 6 - 14 15 - 20 21 - 28 SALMON GREEN BLUE YELLOW YELLOW AT MEETIN6 CITY dF FRIDLEY PLANNING CONMISSION MEETING, JUNE 20, 1984 CALL TO ORDER: ► Chairwoman Schnabel called the June 20, 1984, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:32 p.m, ROLL CALL: Members Present: Ms. Schnabel, Mr. Oquist, Ms, Ga6e1, Mr, Nielsen, Mr. Kondrick, Mr. Saba Members Absent: Mr. Minton Others Present: Jim Robinson, Planning Specialist Gary & Cheryl Michurski, 298 Ely St. N.E. Don Manson, 1482 Onondaga St. N.E. APPROVAL Df JUNE 6, 1984, PLANIJIN6 COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. KONDRZCK, SEC017D8D BY NS. GABEL� TO APPROVE TXE JUNE 6� 1984, pLANNZNG COMMZSSION MINUTES AS WRZTTEN, i1PON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRIJOMA.Y SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANZMOUSLY, �. building, a 22 ft. Spri�g Brook Park, to a 11 ow ti�onstruction of a second accessory by 24 ft. detached garage on Lots 47 and 48, Block the same being 298 Ely Street N.E. MOSZON BY MR. KOIJDRZCK� SECONDED BY NR. OpUIST� TO OPEN THE P[18LIC HEARING ON SP IIBG-II. 11, UPON A VOICS VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC SEARING OPEN AT 7:33 P.N. Mr. Robinson stated this lot was located on the southeast corner of Ely St. and Ruth St. The lot is approximately 8,680 sq. ft. The special use permit is for a second accessory building, a 22 ft. by 24 ft. garage, to be built in the rear yard and be set back 30 ft. from Ruth St. to make it compatible with the existing house to the rear which faces Ruth St. According to code, when the lot to the rear of a corner lot faces the side street, the setback is 30 ft. He stated he had discussed this with the petitioner and she is agreeable to that. Mr. Robinson stated the other stipu)aYion v�as that the driveway be paved, and the petitioner is also agreeable to that. PLANNING COhP4IS5I0N MEETING JUNE 20 1984 PAGE 2 Mr. Robinson stated there is an alley there that is an unpaved� unimproved alley. The petitioner might want to consider petitioning to have it vacated. " Ms. Schnabel asked the petitioners if they had any corrments to make about this request. Mr. Gary Michurski stated the neighbor directly to the east a7so has a double unattached garage at the back of his house. He stated the only reason they are considering this garage is because they have an existing single car garage. They own three vehicles. Since they both work, they have to continue to move the three vehicles, and one ends up left on the street more than it should, He stated they have one vehicle they use seasonally, and they would like to store it in the garage. He stated they will continue to use the existing garage as a garage. Ms. Schnabel stated that if the Michurski's wanted the additional property in their back yard, they might want to approach their neighbors about requesting tfie City to vacate that alley. MOTION BY MR. SABA� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO CIASE THE PUBLZC HEARING ON SP N84-ZI, UPON A VOZCE VOTE� RLL VpTZNG RYE, CHAIRIJOAfAIV SCXNABEL DECLARED THE PDBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:40 p,M. MOTION BY MR, KONDRZCK� SECONDED BY F172, SABA, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT REpUEST� SP M84-I1� BY CNERYL A. MZCHURSKI� PER SECTION 205.07,Z� 3 A, OF TNE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO ALLOW TNE CONSTRUC- TSON OF A SECOND ACCESSORY BUILDINC� A 22 FT. BY 24 FT, DETACHED CARACE ON LOTS 47 AND 48� BIACK 21� SPRSNG B73�OK PRRX� THE SAME BEZNG 298 ELY STREET N.E,� WZTX TXE STIPULATION TNRT THE DRZVb'R'Ay TO 4'fIC pby) CARAGE BE PAVED AND A 3Q FT. SETBACK BE MAINTAINED. UPON R VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE, CHRIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRZED UNAl7IMOUSLY, Ms. Schnabel stated this special use permit request would go to City Countil on July 2. 2. LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. N84-D8. BY DON HANSON : Split off the Southerly T�'f� feet of Lot 28, Au itor s Subdivision No.129, t� make a new building site at 1501 73 1i2 Avenue N.E. Mr. Robinson stated this lat was located between Onondaga St, and 73rd Ave., just west of the 73; Ave, cul de sac. The 7ot is quite large. 34,000 sq. ft. The proposed new lot wcu7d be to the south and would be 13,5Q0 sq. ft. Mr. Robinson stated there are several very large lots that have the potential of being sp7it off in the future. For that reason, there is the potential that 73� cou]d go through and end in another cul de sac. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 20 1984 PAGE 3 Mr. Robinson stated there were quite a few pretty basic stipulations that would go with the lot split. Mr. Robinson stated that at this time, the Planning Corm�ission could either approve the lot split with stipulations, or they could hold an informal a public hearing and invite the neighbors to the west to see if they were interested in splitting their lots as well, possibly putting the street in. and getting this all done at one time. That would be better than having the owner of the new lot put in a driveway to the cul de sac on 732 and then have to remove the driveway in the future if the street was put in. Mr. Robinson stated another consideration was the front yard setback. The exisitn house to the east is set back 65 ft. from what would be this lots's right of way, due to the cul de sac. If they were to tak an average of this lot and a possible future lot to the west of the proposed split, assuming a 35 ft. setback to the west, the average would be 50 ft. With an allowed deviation of 6 feet, the minimum setback for the proposed lot would be 44 ft. The rear yard would be 25 feet. The proposed right of way is 25 ft. and this leaves 27 ft. for a structure, which is a reasonable structure. Mr. Robinson stated Staff would recortmend the following stipulations: 1. Provide 25 ft. street easement for possible future use 2. Concrete curb work on 73z to be done by City's contractor at owner's expense 3. Petitioner to provide driveway to street 4. Driveway to be removed at no cost to the City in the event the street goes through 5. Signed park fee agreement of E750 6. Split to be registered at the County prior to issuance of a building permit, or before October 15, 1984. 7. Front yard setback of 44 ft. 8. Rear yard setback of 25 ft. Mr. Robinson stated this seemed like a good opportunity to look at the possible future development of that whole area. Perhaps the Planning Comnission should hold an informal public hearinq and table the lo! snlit at this time. Ms. Schnabel asked Mr. Hanson if he had talked to his neighbors about the possibility of the�r splitting their lots. Mr. Hanson stated he has talked to the neighbor who owns Lot 26, and he was not opposed to the idea. He stated there is a new owner of Lot 24 so he did not know the plans of the new owner. Ms. Schnabel stated that if the petitioner was not in a real hurry with the lot split, the Planning Comnission could table this until their July 18th meeting. This would give the City the opportunity to contact all the owners of these lots to see if they are interested in splitting also. and invite them to an informal public hearing at the next meeting. She stated this would certainly be to the petitioner's advantage. Mr. Hanson stated he had no problem with having this tabled until the Planning Carnnission's July 18th meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 20 1984 PAGE 4 MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY 1�II2, SRBA� Rb TABLE LOT SPLIT REQUES2, L.S, N84-O8, BY DON McCLUSKY ZN ORDER TO HOLD AN INFORNAL PUBLIC HERRiNG WITX THE NE76HBORS OIJ JULY 28� 1984. . . p UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. RECEIVE JUNE 12, 1984, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. NIELSEN� � RECEIVE TXE NNE I2� 1989, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES. Ms. Gabel stated she would like the Planning Commission to discuss public hearings on lot splits, She was referring to the recent lot split requested by John Hitchcock on the corner of Mississippi St. and Oakley Drive. She stated once the neighbors were notified through the Appeals public hearing process, they came to the meeting en masse. The neighbors were definitely opposed to that lot split. She stated the Appeals Commission voted unanimously to deny the request for variances. They felt the variances were created by the lot split, and that there was no hardship. Mr. Robinson stated he has discussed this with Mr. Qureshi, and it was Mr. Quresf�i's suggestion that whenever the Planning Comnission feels a public hearing is necessary or helpful, they can table the discussion ar�d notify the neighbors and have an informal public hearing, like what was done at this meeting. Ms. Gabel stated she did not agree with that. Based on the fact that the City is �s built up as it is, she felt they are going to have more and more lot split requests, and it is going to be rtrore and more controversial. She felt that the neighbors who are affected have the right to be notified. She felt very strongly about this. Mr. Oquist stated his question would be: Why would they not want to have public hearings for lot splits? Mr. Saba stated he agreed with Ms. Gabel. They are going to be getting more lot split requests, they are going to be more and more complicated, and they are going to affect more and more people down the line. UPON A VOICE VOTE� RLL VOTING RYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRZED UNANIMOUSLY, . Ms. Schnabel asked if Staff could prepare some type of proposal for a change in the ordinance by the July 18th meeting. This could be used as a starting point for discussion. Mr. Robinson stated he could do that. He stated he would like to discuss this with Dave Newman, City Attorney, and he would like to find out what neighboring communities are doing. PLANNING COhMISSION MEETING, JUNE 20, 1984 _ _ PAGE 5 ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY 1�4i. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO ADJOURN TFIE MEETZNG. UPON A Y�ZCE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE� CXAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE JUNf3`20� 1984, PLANNING COMMISSIDN MEETZNG ADJi7URNED AT 8:25 P.M. Res ectfully subnitted, rix.� Lyrme Saba Recording Secretary a`;,,_ .� . �CITY OF FRIDIEY, � sn�� u�wvcasrrr nvE. wre. � FRI[)L6r. MN.63�L 18�21,�Fr'�� D/ � SUBJECT LOT SPIIT RECOROED: / / (/ [:� LS l� DATE: PLAHNING COhMIS5I0t1: APPROYED _ DISAPPROYED DATE N0 CITY COUHCIL: PARK FEE REQUIRED: STIPU{ATIONS: PROPERTY OWNER(S)� , �' AD�RESS(ES)_�yBZ- APPROYED� DISAPPROYED_ DATE NO .�:Aat,.. � .._Y... . . . � ' PROPERTY LOCATION ON STREET AHOUNT PAID FEE d� c`� RECEIPT NO/3I � TELEPHONE NO]8�i-ZZ-2-3 TEIEPHONE ND \ �u vv�,� i � ��r_?rr-� - 3 000 1, TOTAL AREA OF PROPERTY � 3� .�.�t PRESENT ZONING�_ i! REASON FOR LOT SPLIT -Too wti.+ ��. � �z ,� i , The undersigned'hereby declares that all the tacts and representations siated in this apptication are true and correct. � �' � ,�� v- o -�( a►7�; � � ►98y sicr�►TU � /'�f �� Qh.'Y"�j�= NOTICE: A sketch of the property and the proposed lot split aith any existing struc- tures shown should actompany this application. (See reverse side for additional instructions) 0 7 Effective January 17, 1984 1984 POLICY STATEHENT ON PARR FEES ON LAND SUBDIVISION Date In determining fair market value of public areas for land subdivision for cash payment as required by Ordinance C633� the follouing values xill be used: Residentlal Subdivlsion Resldential Lot Split Commercial/Industrial Subdivision or Lot Split a1,500.00 per lot � 750.00 per lot E 0.023 Per sq. ft. This fee is to be paid at the time of final plat or lot split approval. The City Council may defer collectlon to the time a building permit is requested for Sndividual lots created Dy sUCh subdivision/lot split. The City retains the option to accept an equivalent amount in cash from the applicant for part or all of the portion required to be dedicated. PARK FEE AGREEMENT The undersigned understands that according to the City Pla'ting Ordinance, the folloving public park land dedication is required to plat residential, commercial or industrial zoned property. It is further understood that the public park land dedication or cash payment equivalent is at the discretion of the City. � � It is agreed that a cash payment of � �� xill be paid according to the above stated policy for the following subdivision/lot split. It is agreed that the folloxing land dedication is provided according to the above stated policy for the folloxing subdivision/lot split: Dedication: Subdivision/I.ot Split The undersigned further agrees payment requirement, if it is permit. Date 3/o/S/8 to notify all future property ovners or assigns of the cash to be collected at the time of issuance of a building (Property Owner Signature) _ _ GNOF FRIDLEY CIVIC CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITV AVE N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 • PHONE 16121 571-3a50 July 3, 1984 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The Planning Commission will be holding an informal public hearing to consider a request for a lot split, L.S. #84-08, by Don Hanson, to split off the Southerly 121 feet of Lot 28, Auditor's Subdivision No. 129 and Outlot A, Jim Lund Estates, to make a new 6uilding site at 1501 73'z Avenue N. E. As there are several lots in this same area that could be split into two building sites, we are notifying the surrounding property owners of this request. The Planning Commission requests that you attend this meeting to discuss any future developrnent of this area. The meeting will be held on July 18, 1984, in the Council Chamber at the Civic Center at 6431 University Avenue N.E. at 7:30 p.m. VIRGINIA SCHABEL CHAIRWOMAN FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION � Mailing List Lot Split, #84-08, Don Hanson Danny D. Moon 7343 Hayes Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Keith Osland 7345 Hayes Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Thomas Kallroos 1466 Onondago Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Leonard Hjort 1434 Onondago Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 5teven R. Saba 1470 Onondago Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Geroge A. Hanson 1476 OnondagaStreet N Fridley, Mn 55432 Planning Commission July 3, 1984 g Lawrence I. Alpert 1500 Onondago Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 James G. Klick 1506 Onondaga Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Steven M. Napepka 7360 Pinetree Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Kurt J. Korochetz 7350 Pinetree Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Robert E. Larson 1533 73 1/2 Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 James B. LaTourneau E• 1523 732 Avenue PJ.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Don and Anne Hanson 1482 Onondago Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Susanne Novacinski 7395 Hayes Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 William F. Rankin 7385 Hayes Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Dennis J. Kugler 1560 73 1/2 Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 John F. Gribble 1488 Onondago Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Gerald J. Wickman 1494 Onondago Street PJ.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 LeRoy A. Larson 1503 73'z Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Pamela L. Pfeiffer 1510 Onondago Street N.E. fridley, Mn 55432 Richard A. Dols 7361 Pinetree Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 John G. Eggert 7351 Pinetree Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Kenneth R. Hoeschen 1510 73'2 Avenue N. E. Fridley MN 55432 James H. Vaughan 1520 73� Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 10 Page 2 Gerald J. Sherrek 1530 73z Avenue NE. Fridley, Mn 55432 Rueben T. Nordin 1540 73yzAvenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 �ohn L. Hackey 1545 73rd Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Timothy R. Lundahl 1535 73rd Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Douglas A. Fagerwold 1505 73rd Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 James G. Hinrichs 7355 Hayes Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 � � � S Ttr" ADD� � �, .� ..:�,, F ,c.. •• ;, _ . _ ,. . �^,.� �,.. , ,:.. . � ,� �„�sio F- ��s�� ;,,; .�,.., -er� � L S. #84-08 � � , '�'Yc t` i�`G�± r s� ;� ,. "'']; : C�•., „^�'sod � l4�! 7s•o �.. 1501 73 1/2 Ave. N.E. Q `�.� '+.. ' tn 376sT ' � , f ' � "1 = ,'!d�/ y�,��',af., W ' � l .. . .. � < .. � ' . � j�+. r i, � r p .� . If4l.! t3o '`S ��1�3 /SO/ s ' i � ' • :'�r' �„�,,�� _ �s�,�,f� � ` ' �OE ��5� 0• � ,�.. ,z;,.� .�. , ,. �E � M N ,,� 'i+ ..,, �... ��i� 9 �s�F ,� �• a irss i�fs ir. Lv� ��s�s�so ,, _ .fr•:: .: .,... .:...•., ,�. - `„ 76 TH N. .. � _ ,. , ' „e ..� Gi./19 ./��lf� � ,e .:.,,: . x � .y n �'"" i4q0 , /S6 i57� isa 5; ��r,�: ,4,s ; ,�., UDITOR S ; f� s . , ��g �+er g '' �. % �:, ` � ;ti"� ,, {' � �. , • �....; ' Z C. � ." "^^'•, I 1_ .< <. . � , � , � r � •� ,,, ,; .�I �� _ � , � 1.� ; 7 i /�.-.., a��,' . , ..,i �4�r ,,..� / . �4sg Z . L.3r #3z - r� ��} .,t. , �r b_. . � z a . .,• � � _ . � .� /3S7 /3 7 i.� ., i.»�.Ir • � • ' v _ . / 3'� "`• . ^: �o f '�:— ..� r �� . , 6 �. ro -�,� . �. .� ORIVE . ".�. . " �O '�• i4F5 �r.`'• � � ,. �3so ►�Ge i��e /"y...., �•r, `_,,�� 4 �� _` �,fao c�� i � � .. � � Or ,..,.. , ..; � < � ce x.7� Sr . M�` ; .� „� I �� . ` O �_ : � �r/� � 4�°` _�. , '�'�'�' �- � ' � � � �4: �- �}� �i � � u`� r . � � ! ' y � i I,' ^ oo � /brf/ � ytl' � v : B � .° � O �: L,i• � 1 ��' // �//M i ' h � ' i 3cs ��si r�s�i�or i}z � i "s � ; f�.� : �� ,�,�' • � ` > . w i �1 7S �� /��i /513 i7 I !' �~ r—. ON N GA STR � _ 'l�l ia�si2 �8�16 '�, �'„ �1�3,' � U�o t7G :� 4� i��o rroc.+ Z^• �SI� ! 2 3 4 S � �.3.5 � B��V� �iV � /Z e� / . � �. /1/0 �/ �%� N �svs � � , ,. � ,.,o ? � 2 2 F 26' -. 3� : " �' !' �;-- s -,3�5 �,...1 i ,, �� " ' � � 2 � ,,,.,. .. ;(� i:�a��a � w'i•c ( c�� / D 5.,� W.' JJ� J ;�., '�� Yt,�-,rM �1 w�4 � i�3.► ��re 2,. ISB� � ` � .. n� f ' .I.,r:r7i 2 � �--�'w� ` __"' . - - .:. �.�. ( 2 �. t • t � I�rA' s�f�Ii� A✓� f M) �+?�! _ � rszo � �. � 1. �rso .�-c+ � �lt1 A.0 �i ia.p t .I IS ' MI'J� f.w° �M�I.,�,. � � ,�.�. ,�� .� ' AT S ,�.�� ` � ►- •, •,�,o �- 2 3 25 27� 29 l �S. .. u.r ,i,oa.�. ..,u - �sas is� J ��r ` �L..: 2 � Aw. Rs �1 �, � • s s i ��r n _ f�s �r�� lse� l�,l �sb� l��s Dt� s--- ---- ��?� -' i. • -�: _ --s�,��f-�4ie , --�• ��__ _ N:f. . . -- , . . -. _ . � ,. � _ - ' f _ S� , � -,� �-., I�i� . ; , _ �� '!" t _ � } �� _r+ f. ,� � �, . f, :� . � . ��'l 'Z � �'�Y � . � ;- �lq ,� ( +�� ..C'! �: . • {�( � �'� �u�; ".t;�'�^'r .,::, :, Ml' . �jr°'y,4Ti.'• ::�+��=��io,•..j,,'� •'•` -4( �r.z�' �T��'-'t .' "'. "_ ..i • �! � � '• �` ' . 45.� � i4��µ �'�i ♦ j ` 4 }��,+fi �' �+, / � ^p� 1� �w�f � ��' � �� ,�F , i'. s . � �� `.�'-'��°'�� fi: � r � �� P� M 4.. �` ..a� -s . L . . . A�, .. _: �� , # �. W:.:..H' hr'�M3� t �:, ; ._ ;.e'k ;,,, , ,+rti �.5�, .S. �i84-06 12 .s-{ t ' � 4' '�� ' f K;� �.t ' � ?'iti, � .` a ,A..A „t "'X�� r 1501 73 1/2 Ave N.E. �'' � �• r �. ��'� •, . � F r :. 1 4 � �. �.Y � ` i� �� `� �� ;�! * 1�K -�� . .h � �� • C�i y^n� 4. ��`� � �. . �'�� . / l ^ w�` �.,t:. ,s�} yi+'- .r.?;}.;��.i . . C � � :`�,� .! y . } `'�`'�'- � „ w�..'a - r. , .. . ,�� y� �:., �- �xi' '. `# �'°��N ,•_ .•q � . �. r,. ' ° .i:'. � a i cs �� . • • _ ,� `,_� `' r, �y,. � .' � . ; : , .. l} ky . . .� �� 5�3 �� ' M1� .?' . ..� ' � . . .,.�- / �ny�t��y15 3 �4Jt'M, tl��7".� . � �,,. � � �C'? J �'tMII -/r� #� �f . �yl �\[ �' 9 .. K . ♦4'. 1� .�3 � S /� 4�Y ,y°�{ . 0 f f µ%,�a_ I' t�� V �F �t.SVlf i��l? ' r:�-� 1.��.. .� t �M , T' : , � J a : o ' � r�. . l�` ?Y.1�i � � L.� p y �.`I ;E _ � Yr.� �.�: ��. y _� � r' �;r,. LL�. � vL ..: � . . «v � ' �.:'.�.R. ��r . ' .. . • ' . � ' AY � � �' 1�y . 7i. . �. 1 ..�i�i �,� � ��1 ti..� � j` �l: ��i. ,• . `' }rikS^'T'"'.ea�.:s�-� �: �'�.0 �. s�z `..y , j'�4',�._ s.�.RY+. � , / � ._�: .. �. . J. , �. •� ��. k �,.� Y��{''e� . r G � . F... LI \ Nt F �`, . � ' !? C�J i 4 � ' 4 • ' �` ' • � t Al � � • �'�� ..; F :YsN� :. .�'.'. r � Y � �,(�� . � �� % -i ♦ � -f' -('Y -. � � � �s . ,�JF'.,� '�.��fS�`��Ij,f,�i :s>��.: r�:�hY�H� � �, ./ '��e "` �� . + . t �:.. • 'S .: . y�'l .'i4t f�^..'S y (r S �. � t `lT' i i- � � t ��F '�. ..: t ��'�.t� y � �" . ZJ, r �. : t � �- �` ,� j� .(,� � � �' � � � ;`�� ; k + �'{ ��'��t5 } � � r '�.y.i ¢. +�' �^c-'4 R :,.i# � a�r i� � 3 'N�{ , J• . . . 1. �j, �?3 �{ • ` A t .�{ ! J �„_ �Y I�� ,�� •�..^ . �� / . ° t..�f �' »i°'l +� �,r . + t � lff� "RT � �� ' �Y .>�� .r � Y i_ y .��' '•: �-, '� v� l. . �. �S u. � `v� � : \ �� ••i : � _ �� . �Y.� i . .- � � � a!? ��l.� �'• n . u�� "jr . �. ,:„ � j , ,,' �` y , ' : j�: � �: , 'i � ,. � �'�''.�'ywf. 4��\v , � , ,�'�^ f � `' 4 � � �\► / j�!' 'Y �NZ �ia�y t� \L � �� .,I. ,I. Y T V'� Q�F .'�Y� .5+� �` �L�� ,�l 1 . �Y�♦ � �.i � � a N � -' � � �. �I � �� ,��J� Jl ,�j7� �j.`' ��y-s . �,� � '�i '� '..� 4t ;� '� -,� `e ti;.� . ° ,yR � '�` / � � �:� � �� s � � 4,, � , . � �� ..• 4 ; ,�T Y .�''� % ��?� C-'{,!. :.�' ,� .3,� + r,�� j � .t. 1, '�. �n ��,�� , . �.. fy`�. �. tv� � .�.[ � . ' e... I ` .• S ��i .' . � r �'f{,r' . � �� V� i! - • �, Y � �� . ..�yi�''��d� '._ �•r�.rF p i 1�' l'i` •�;s �t�� x h r. �' � z ° fi? i� . ' �. 'iL � �f � r+-.... �y. ':'}� , . Ta :.:+> C� �� . . ,�1 ` n �•• � S � iy�. J�. ; . . I 4 � •a' �' � r�r.S'. :x� y �.� ��. � ~ �,�' �'.�'?.' � +. � . Y'ti. . p ' y��; - �, yt �ji �yt ... �'a.� �! � �, � °�" 1-�.� �. � ., � � :�' ,� a", � "�'� � Fy� � y ~ � �5 �,, � �� ; ��{ , ` r ' t � "' t'�`�+{ • ,•+ 1 �• ♦ ♦ f` .�a ,► ' 'rh � f •4:.` �}�.�.•� . �� ' . . � �E'} Y -:,,.{'.v '� !1_. -. �;u. . � . �'n ti .,�,�..'T : , � 1S ,` s�-i�,� r Y . � ;, ;r'l : � ; �.. .r>, rt,, r� � ' . , 2_�:1�.�� 6'� _ - . . 4T _ '� �! l�'.�VVLCp�� • �i.�, .,"t�a�. �� s�' .. .1 }. �� A � � � � ��. . •� � _ � � �3 �, .w�. w- �'i y}''� l �J , !'� ! y� _ Y g�;* _� , r�i,t� . �• ^-� , �'...� si. � .., i � �,�+ ;� �j - �a.�;. ) "' ,— y!' r s+�� 2,-Y ,� � s � � .aY �3/ > y � K � � e � �":� � •�`S ��._- , -�_� � �.�F,..J 1 �.. Jp 1��. � '''(((��"wi�ii ��i' 't' r : ..� [� � ' �tiv`,. ,:�. � �a . . � �� '! y� � f,�} . . ' t . � , � �ig g -�-� + -�' �-7 T �� r'�i . F t .� �.; _ _ `.� .E.. � '`� ,A� � � . ( s `ti �� .a �'�' � �.' u'.� ry � � ` (`:. � r . .:; � fia! �- ��H/.yi� { � � �^/,/� •• � .+. i 1 N � �5'� '� l� . . !'TC�_::� � � . . . M�. •.^�� f. .. ]��...)i�i �%` � `�ryY. ��. ,'� � � • . Y . . . ` 4'�1/�.�� . 5 P�;OI°�sE D LoT �f'�- I T �� r� >� uP � �� NN F ) ---¢ ONONDAGA S7"�?�E•E"� N. E, L.S. N84-06 1501 73 1/2 Avenue P�.E.^ -- I16.00--- -- - IID.00-- - �''�, i. -� s.oa - :� I � I ��'� I � �� a I � I ', ^� N�QTN �AFT � � o ;'Ii � 2p,b� � � Pa e; � � o p ml m 4 tl I T� � � I � � s.c - ° 1 ��-- o i Y� J V. I 22.; � u � . � � ��:� � �� a m � � � � I l��— T �.DO �QA�T 5o�'f av 5a F� . 13�5 � 13 � — �� / . _ —� / H / �j �I ✓i i� I i i i �\ n Zo_,o ; ,� l l. S. �84-08, Don Hanson 14 xa,s '�e.i ' � l.' New building site at xz.a � 1501 73 1/Z Avenue N. E. o �' o m � � o a �, - �I,,,� a � � o, , �, m � 3 �. mi ; � O N — V I � I..i n � � `^ li � � 21.8 ' I' � ° �. N Tk � I. I�'•I � � i..' i N � ` �� I�. _.t"" N I � �9.0 , � 12.0 ?6.B �.00 5.6 - , N � A q � i v � I � P � � O 00 O SC Mrn O `-�-J � � I • -��Q.�O___ ' � �� tU �u� � � ' � � � � �1 =� � � .g � , �s� ; - � — : H� sp3 y�o ga. FT N� /� \\ �� / � �� / � � � � � � �o� N . : ��>- � ; " 731/ ,4 v.E:_ N. E; ._......_ --- ,�o oo..- -----. -- N L�-� - �� \ `\`` ` �' PUBLIC NEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING GOMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, July 18, 1984 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 P.M. for the purpose of: Consideration of a request for a Special Use Permit, SP �84-12, by James I. Taylor, per Section 205.14.1, C, 4, of the fridley City Code, to allow a repair garage (Midas Muffler), on Lot 1, Block 1, University Industrial Park, the same being 8080 University Avenue N. E. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place, VIRGINIA SCHNABEL CHAIRWOMAN PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: �uly 4, 1984 Ju]y 17, 1984 15 16 Planning Commission July 3, 1984 MAILING LIST SP#84-12, James Taylor for Midas Muffler Shop at 8090 University Avenue N.E. James Taylor 1487 97th Avenue N.W. Coon Rapids, MN 55433 Fridley Golf Driving Range Box 32101 Fridley, Mn 55432 Gerald P. Bury 7479 Able Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Prudential Insurance Company 3701 Wayzata Blvd. Box 709 Minneapolis, MN 55440 CiTY OF FRIDLEY� I SUBJECT 647� LINIVEASITY AvE. NB. FR�DLEY, MN. 65a3C t6'12�,671-�50 SPECIAL USE PERMIT 17 SP !f� � _ . . . . _"' ' ' . AODRESS �D S� D �i�-v ��`�'�`' �� DATE � S PLANNING COMMISSION: APPROYED _DISAPPROYED DATE '� /� �`i 0•� CITY COUNCIL: APPROVED DISAPPROVED DATE STIPULATIONS: NAME � `""'`� ` % """'"" STREET LOCATION�OF PROPERTY I' LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF:PROPfRTY PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFI,C`ATION "' ACR�RGE OF PRO°ERTY 3`1 ' a ' � � � Section of the Code: ��]�•_ g � NO EoZDd `� RECEIPT NO / 70 �.--�0� ISTING USE OF PROPER7Y VtiG.h(�l r IBE ERIEF�Y THE 5 IA� USE APFLiEG FuR: i ►.1 l :— � Has the present applicant previously sought to rezone, plat, obtain a lot spli or variance or special use permit on the subject site or part of it? _�es no What was requested and when? The undersigned understa�ds that: (a) A list of all residents and owners of proper- ty within 20(1 feet wijl be attached to this application. .. - •�,. '(b) This application must be signed by ail avners of tfie propertY+ or an exp)anation �jiven why this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any Jetect in the proceedings resultin9 from the failure to . list the names and addresss of alt residents and pr�perty owenrs of prop�rty in question, belongs to tfie undersigned. A sketch of proposed property and structure must be drawn and atitached, showing the following: 1. North direction. 2. Location of the proposed structure on the lot. 3. Dimensions of property, proposed structure, and fron and side setbacks. 4. Street names. 5. Location and use of adjacent existing buildings (within 350 feet). The undersi�ned fiereby declares that all , e facts and this application are true and correct. DATE '�S ij L� SIGNATURE C � ons stated in �� G�� ""`�'7 "o��.,,s EPHONE ND �L`'' G"'l.�' lC /� 7�J. � 4��i �a . : i i : : x a a : � .� ..I. � I • . . ` o.�w� _I .. I I � .I . . . . ' � � .. �.. . . I '�' I �'� - 133tl1S� ; — r- —i ' — „r _.____ 3Qyppq-----�� ti � .. `�e � : � `; h .� . S� ..; ' ,.,. ..s. „_ : � a i i ] i .. 4�, t a R� 1.('� u `� � v 1 d 0�� V O.. �, �.. c r � .'3'N V '15 NOSIQtlVI �° O Yc e 'h� �` - . I ..,.�Z� . . N �:" �� . � . ��- � - W . 3.: :.ry i � �p.. R..�.im a• ` � q r �� . a �Z 2�.. ��'�, W 1 y 3.N ��1S •SIOtlW 7 , r 1 i� ��' y� � r• dyr t �..y � a • u ' 7 j • _ ;G,T ,�..i�`2.., ; : _, , . • � 371 • �15 NOStl31i3f � �� a ' „, ^ �i E � ": �i � � � 'i �'� Uir ".� . ` n3 ' � � i � _ t ' .ry o... .. � ;� � � � � ' � . , ; ,Q'c a0 . > � `± � • • : J I.. n ,i .� y ' , � ` � .. � T e �j , �.O � ��' ' a i J � �.� W t � � � Q. . . . . .. , �w .. VY � .O• a . a .. � < �� . 3N 1S N019NIHStlM . . � �, �", + \�. = '.} 2 `,,..`¢ �• � _ ° „ _ .i �• �. Q ; "e n > •}�'.a �: .'�' � '� J � ` •' . d • .. . ' � -- .. '-_ - � m �s .., , n `�j . I � ! � � � � � ° `1 �" . � � � a'� . . � , . .. . . ". � ";� t: ' ^ � , ' p .. ' � � e C� 2 O� � � � �'` V � 1'\ V .� � EII .�\ _.�• . .. ..�. .. � . !N . . . .. . .. . .. � , � ;,i„-'. _ . `' , �° �, '. -- �°-a�rnu3 M ' �y� . _ : _ arou `- . , ' _. _ .. _ _ -- -- • _, � . . '.Y]-. I ! 4� W •N n . 4 � �. , I • , ��•��a�°�^��`�� ^��'�� '3'N� 133tl1S H19• i � . ti-T't �� • ;� � � �^ h 3 $ m `.� �. � �. � N \ � I �' i �I ]i � 3'N� 133M1S H1S• �i .'�1 t' +..i W I.. I a u ' i � 8, t y i. .. . 2 4� v ay w I! 1 I i. � •�� \ T ' T J � � I ` •� � � � ` `n V � .'1 I � � y `� �� —_ — c � — . : �j � � � � � : xN'T�I �, • 'p. � . W i��Jl��r! I •$ ;�`�~, � ��{.Z� �1 Z � �� :e x; , P. ;r�a p: �t ii i p . : E� � A s . � a 7, I � �:, 9 _ �1 � i��; i t!� � � �� ..�.yc � � . I � . � inia i ' � 3�InM35 t ,�. ._ 1_ .. . .. _ f p ''� - AVMH9FH-�- :�- ..•- ...--• NNflal - -- � � � ----31V1�-- �, , t �� - �— y` �� 7CI'I3 3rYf 1�LVa��-� _ — ..:-•. '�6 � � —":.� . _ �_ ...__ . -.— ;.... ..-. - - --"' � ^r------ --"-- : E. !� I � � I �,� � i � � i � n � -`-__-�__- --___ �.{ -- -- ---__ , _ ; � ♦ /� — 3" '3'N anuany �('��s.�aniu� 0808 � 2101AV1 93Wt1(' Zl-b811 dS O i � .�� i i• � , H l y� `Y—� \ � n• Q I �V N _._.. t�,=-• �a1 �G- Q' � i� 3 = � U � .,s - Z _ ._ — Q'O4py V �i\ � V � � \� � � il� j ,4__ ' I ��^� � � . � .YfS. - W3k�fP! � �. � � � � � � � . � � r ��r��'� � y C.I I Y VI- t�LAINE _ ;�I SP #84-12 James Ta lor 8080'Univers�t AJenue N.E. \ I �^� � ' __ `- , _� � -� '� � ` e �i + . L t' .� '�"`� � �.%n � l� r-� , ) � � � %-. � � .I y ✓ � '��j in, �.I 1 1 `�1 �I ,: �� -) i'` � ' �,': '� '�� J `�+ �� ir C .'� � y d .� � � . ri.; i � �� "3 .•� ` � t°� f �' .� "' � c.- r ; " ; ('� '�'^� r; " � . � ''� � � � �" �, � •., r . �• �� j�r�i : Pt�RIC� �' �„ a i�j,� �.1 Cl •� � ,.� . • �f �� {-, ` � � � � �� - -� � � .: e ;, '� I' j � _.� -; �.� �-. � �� ,�� `� -,� �; '"� L.� � �� .�. a-� �---'...C� � _ � ( �/� � e � `� y (_�� 1~ � i r ? � � � { � S/^� 'J �4! S W I� � 3" i n -''� ^i f�1 ` � � 7 „ � ' �{ • � �, � wi ` f 4 ^ ) � r.j � � `� _' � U .s� " �' ',^i i' � �'� (" � v. ,,, f>� - ; �;. � .,�,j , ., � :� � � �� ; � � � '- , /s- (� � � �' �� '� r� � ..J � � .� �� `a.� ��' l' � �. t ,Y w �- " �'-� � �a � � _. ^ � -, �? ('� ' C � • � ^ ,, ; ,� • ,' � - � �`�' � c � C r�j ,,, � ` �; `_�.��' -' �`�� . �,J F? � ^s� c� � �� "; �✓ � •,:,� � (� `� � � '�� ' �, C � ,,� ,�. �`� � �' C'' � - :� -; , �, ' � . . � f � . ��G, _ .� .., _ � :_, . �- •��•�•�•� �• • • • • • •_• • • • ►,�.•. _•. �- • . . • • • Y . • • . • • • •, . . . . 1r ;r 4s2 � _ � �� ' •�♦ �� I 1' ` \� �9�• . . 1 y� ' / � j �` / 9° �� s{ ��a, -� s'�' �� '�: oo< �n� - � zna � � -p ,,. > ±' � � \ � �� D T � � I a I \ ! \`', �\ � 1S ��\ z � ' � '\ P � '. - r m� � f,,'..i � ��1 �'� � . '? I c\•`� L\ 4� \ U ��. I P �.\ � 1 �..` C �� I L ,, � � :?� '� � O i , �I � � � �S� �..., � � ` L s., � . ��A O A 1 � i ' ° ��' h� ,.; -IC e ��i '3 �� Q j } �y '`� �. ,.. st •�� C 9 � N � ;i �� r I <r {t .:: .x. � ai.p � " � f ��1 �.a JI � �' "7 '��'., o� .: � � t � - ' � .�: rt K `�' ` � 'U QQ � �. ,�:�` I.n i :� � � ��.i , � � � \ ,93o-i, n \'� �L � � � \/ 1 Y r?�� it�\ L \ i � , ��f�•- ��s :�h. y ,�3Y's^�_��?� �" ,[�•.� +�r � ai C � h? � \ � /% �' ` � � ` #p{•v M1 t � y� \ . P �- 4 �,� l �-� `� f ' K�- i �. i 7 y ��. .: '�� ?y � ' �' �' � • . . _'Y k o4 . r . � ":� I: � �i�� .. r � : � `. .� � ' � � u ?+.. _____��_�.. P ' ' � �. . I { ' � ' Y� � �- F �... � �t �. -t "�fi+�. .� � - , , � { . � :��w .5 T.J� ��,� . �� a � �L1► y.; �. < ' � `� � . .. 4 �� f. �• k- � � �k� , �\ p , �� - � �. �}t` t `2- a•`�r j_ iy �. z � .\ p 's' Tf1 �-� 31' 1 l� ��,y` FMT4'�ry �p M lY 't� �� Q � (� . .A .` ... il6' T�a,1K k i��4 � �S .�l l� . ��. � . V E ' +. ".` �a r y ' "�'r J; .� ''�' .i 1Gs�.4:t,�g3�` 'ex �.-. '� _i2. . � ',,��yj� �` � a � �� a A`++s`'`� "� '��:+'� �.3� 2 � . . � -.' � � y -!_ kl t� f yy �3�'h�.' c a#\ � ._-1' ♦ Yi 4 y _ i ��{ .fl B 1` � y�, y �' , � v � �'-` � s a.�;. �� +".'. ,r.!�`�.J'� s t ,�.'�'(`C-24 `�'`.t. `�i �� :� , .' j�, ' � •" t � tf'7��'� � � ♦tt i;� v � ' � r ;j ', // ,, % �j/ ,� �,�r � i �'' � , . / ; � , � - � � 3,y�.o. o k , , ; !, '. , � '; , ' . � -- � -. ' �PFpF'o�ED � �1�W '�2�1_D(� ,' � � ° ,, ,. � zo �' � „ . ° - _ ,�Q � �4v��' �a. Fr � , , � � T ; _ � y , , ; ., Q •' � , = /} ��.!. U � ,,�� I ic ' ' , �.. ' � _�.�� / ! I . � . . � � 'cSRCi � :? � ` ` Y .4_. >. r ,' 94 d` py1b4 �. .��. : r i �— --�----r—=—; --- o -� ; r a. o � ' ' _ _ ' � .. \ �j . . � F . ;_.. . . - � �� r � F ., �� aj: i 6U0.01U(q 5E7DAC' .� . �3S '� " .v � � �_� �- ^ .. „a �.��o I' _� ' _ � � �[.S-5 Rh . i � pa � ��,� � i � c�p�, I +..,,— .m�.. _,�.i.—. —fARKW4i1[Y3� '� �_\._��t ��1 /`�..'; �•. m - i \ p'�,�_� ,Q .�� '"��%" 1.��. �---'� :%.__ � f' i � ' �a�� 1 i ��- --_�,4�.3�0�_' _ _ .. �' _� N bb' �8' 2i ° W OZ 1` � '3'N anuany �'�isaaniu� 0808 �ol�Pl sawe� Zl-b8 N dS �- � . I , , �. , r PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, July 18, 1984 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 P.M, for the purpose of: Consideration of a request for a Special Use Permit, SP �84-13, for MCCK Properties, Inc, by Don Chouinard, per Section 205.07.1, 3,E, of the Fridley City Code, to allow Lots 78 and 79, Block A, Riverview Heights (zoned R-1, one family dwellings), to be used for a parking lot and garage, to be used in conjunction with a 7-unit multiple dwelling at 441 Hugo 5treet N.E. Any and e>> persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. VIRGINIA SCHNABEL CHAIRWOMAN PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: July 4, 1984 July 11, 1984 zi Planning Comnission Appeals Commission June 29, 1984 MAILING LIST SR #84-03 MCCK Properties, Don Chouinard and Variance for parkinq lot and garagP adiacent to 441 Hugn Straat N_E. MCCK properties, I�c. C/o Don Chouinard Mr. & Mrs. Gary Claggett 13562 Central Avenue N.E. 440 Hugo Street N.E. Anoka, MN 55303 Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Andrew Bultena 381 Ironton Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432_ Mr. & Mrs. �ames Burnett 377 Ironton Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. Leonard Dailey 8191 East River Road N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Adams 430 Ironton Street N.E. � Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Eugene Zuelke 8161 East River Road N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 JoAnn C. Rech 8161 Ruth Circle N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mr. Stanley Jones 8151 Ruth Circle N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Donald Livgard 8141 Ruth Circle N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Clyde E. Meyer 420 Ironton Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Mark Maloney 391 Ironton Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. Phill Wilson 401 Ironton Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Roger Ghai ��,rrrii�rr.v �,r�iT�22�-�N:€ Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Frank Hegner 450 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Mitchell Cook 420 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 James W. Overcott 360 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. John H. Kobs 369 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Ryan Falk 381 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Guy Lungsten 389 Hugo Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 June L. Frehn 8180 East'River Road N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Ernest Draheim 8164 East River Road N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Javier Rivera 499 Glencoe Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 ,lJ+- �� `^� � � 3 � � u � =�-, s -� -f i 3 q %J-., .y _ [,f<M 22 (o C17Y �OF FAIOLEY� 64�1 IJNIVEpSITY AVE. NE. fRIDLEY� MN.63a3C [6�21,67�-7450 ADDRESS ��' ° � PLANNING COMMISSION: A PR� CITY CAUNCIL: STIPULATIONS: SUBJECT i SPECIAL USE PERMIT DISAPPROYED 23 SP �� DA7E � `��/ g � DATE N0. APPROYED DISAPPROVED DATE NO T STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY_ LEGAI DESCRIPTION OF;PROPERTY PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFICATIO� � N� , fEE�QO RECEIPT NO �<� I� �` E�A�'s `� ,� t vF� k � . , zTaceFE� 9�,79 �'� ISTING USE OF PROPERTY V+�c a^� ' ACREAGE OF PROPERTY 1�2 — 3<<i DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE SPECIAL USE APPLIED FOR: CrA�2AGFs' S� S'Aer�NC� Fv�f 2 u•.� -F 64. (c<<<.� Section of the Code: /�'-I ZO`5'�i• -3 �5 Nas the present applicant previously s variance or special use permit on the What was re uested and when? Qre,�i .G �(-W� y 2 G� . �°'�i�J6f°' t to rezone, plat, obtain a lot split or ect site or part of it? �es �/ no. �� The undersigned understands that: (a) A list of all residents and owners of pro�er- ty within 200 feet will be attached to this application. .. •• - � ,. '(b) This application must be signed by ail owners of the property. or an expianation �jiven why this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any Jefect in the proceedings resulting from the failure to . list the names and addresss of all residents and property owenrs of prop�rty in question. belongs to the undersigned. A sketch of proposed property and structure must be drawn and aEtached, showing the following: 1. North direction. 2. Location of the proposed structure on the lot. 3. Dimensions of property, proposed structure, and frortfand side setbacks. 4. Street names. 5. Location and use of adjacent existing buildings (within 350 feet). The undersi�ned hereby declares that all t� facts and r�spr sentations stated in this application are true and correct. a„� P�,,Q�..v.� DATE Io — 1�—� y SIGNATURE �,%Gy✓t� r�� — ADDRESS �3SCZ CC�v"�Cr�c. Av� M,c.=• TELEPHONE NO 75_7-6�a� p�L.7y�,�y,{o c� i�+uf1C.4 . <%tAI 1rJl'j03 .. .'r .� i 0 IUlOKwCOUN�YMINNE50TA TAXPAYER'S COPY STf�iEME«`Op`uOFE�fw?AKPqaHSeoMn�� v ppNaLDC.SAILEY.TREM15UI�ER �MUCUMX��rno-y�ov�wdPrv�u.O��n�i I�NOKA, MINNESOTA 55J�] � • l� � nwwweca, P.O3 30 2< Z4 0111 '�`-'-�43� � ru,....cei.o�_ 57593 0625 ' sFFOWM[�- M. C C K INC ,.. COMi11�P �U11LN�Sf11: 'MOReh'OfSC��If10M: RIVE=. VIca 4:IGNTS CiTY . �c nf , { � OF FAIDL?Y A�L T� �UQTIOh --. RT . WaY OF HPLS Aha!C4 ? C1:YJ';• �4�.CE �i7 :0 IN 5�1/C TA%YI�YEP-AGENT OWMERLONTR�CTFVRCHASEA �{��. :Y� 999 M C C K 1YC 1356? CENT°;� NE M^ 55301 � 11562 CENTF�L AVE NE a��Ka _ _ ___ NsAL.LAK` ______. vy cc3�?. UIORACWNTVNINNEfOT11 TAXPAYER'S COPY iTATEMENTOFIppPENTYTA%MVABLEINI! DON�LO C. S.�I Lf V. TNE.45URE11 �' Df SCUrno� rp� ua rvoos�s o+m �NOKA MINNESOiA 66.'IW mw�<cuw[c.�rr�p.�aroo�r�nunu�.w•.n� " rwwinw[�: . ROS 30 24 24 071:• ''$ZJ4JE � �*••+�5��= 57593 Q42J �E o�� M C C K S V C -� corn�.c* nn¢we[n: NIORMlYUfBLRI�IIOM: C C ♦^ �IV.R VI_�d HE.�MT� C:TY OF F�IDL:'Y L�TS 9G 31 Q2 3?? ?Lr � RIVER VIE�l Xi:uXTS TA%VAVE 11dGEMT pWNE RCONTRACT YUNCM0.5E R M((K :4� 999 M C C K INC 1i5G? 'EFT?AL NE 13562 C�NTRA� AVE NE �NOKA MN 553^? HAN, UKE :fY SSt�3 _ �NOK�CWNTYMINMEEOTA TAXPAYER'S COPY STATEMENTOfPqOIEMTYT.�X�l1VR8LEIHIP pONP.LO C. OYI IEY. TXEIISUPE�1 opre�rv 0[xmripi �p� v� �oo0Y5 d�o •NOKA,MINNESOT� 55JOJ P•[imawm.✓nwor.pnr�p�nrw.wnv� " rm�u..ste�. R03 30 24 2G pt ;' � .�-:',�'4 ,�,,...,,KEi,w:. 57593 O4GJ sEtuwnt�- MCCK :NC i' i' i _ CONTII/.CT �URCN�SFM: MO�F11i'I Df5C111RqN: Jf ff.l�l�Y VIEa HE:�HTS RIVE<V:=.1 4Ei3MT$ CITy L?T; ,'o . 7� ?L✓. . 'I�ER- TRXPAVER�AGENT � - OWNERCOH�RP.CTFUNCHASEX ; J "9:�oU:•.9i< :a 9J9 MCCK INC '?.. ':C_ C:°K TEaa�C' 1I562 CcNT?A: cVi \ _ '.5. �4':FT�q '+': ;511: XAN �AKi . ��+�i? . � JS 10 c4 11 "' ' � �RE YOU ELIGIBLE fOR A REFUND7 M fMp qJI li YpU'11[ F WIBLE iM OME M fOTN pi 1MESF IIfiUMOS ... .. - r TN[MINNf50i1111pRI1TYT�SMEfUMO �f�A�• � y . . .. ' '. .��we�mwru��vt�rKnwn . •rnuw�v • . p10NACOVNT'MINNETOTA - TAXPAYER'S COPY UONI�LOG �/�ILEY.iRE0.SURE11 11NOKA, MINNESOTA 66JD3 "MMO"�F". R03 ?0 2L 24 G172 n.?iG4c nwrar��rq:. 57593 �^.L27 ' rFE awrrte- M C C K Iii C C01RI11Ll'UIICNtiS(II: ��ORPTV DFSCI11�1qN: f •�7•• •JO ALL TH PT Oi T4E UNNR!'C9 VLY E%TiNSI'J.V JF iH? 5 T�%MVER�AGENT 999 M C C K INC 1.56? CENTRaL RVE '_ NAA LhKE "e: 5:��, it"'�I_- I•��' 1150C II% I G^� YOUR ITEMI2ED STATEMEN �� . .. L��3fi.'11 I ��. fTATEMrEnM..�T OF'IqOFENTV TA%OAVABIE iN tg� mw «i.6�"xtt+s.�ioy o�i.an:.o%�.iav�on. D�r�(�i h'�rv+ 4IVFa V:E'a NEI,uTS ,iT �VAC4TE^ LY:�; :L� 0° L11Jc �i L�T °.� 'Lr e e�Uco OWNER-CONTRAQ PVRCHASER M�l� I�i( 7!`6° c,.TcsL qr ,":CKa YV :5?J'. .....•`'i�n... �.^.I .......... Hu o 25 Y — � �!�K��O � 't :a ; ,�� i ° I + ' Q� �Qr�� P q ,v. co�wee � ,)� � � . \ J� v ` d s[c.! /.^s.�'fJ % =� -i...:_ . � _. ^ �t i�y �...?__�..�. - ,�--��irCri_��uw __�-w� � i I ' `= REVISED 4 � -� ��-'-"-��-�,' �' AUDITORS p a � . �3 '-' �3 `� � �' Q� �1 � � < 4 � x Q- � Q? O ' ,i �, `�. � Gw e c. p��L . ��`..r`:"�iJ'i� ` i . � a 1. � J � � itl u� � • _.4w�a�rp�..._ N 1� _ I` ,,. j� > `T ; � � ►�1 A �. 3 - ' J p ' E. .. � 1 � ��3 1 L i.t� -¢� L`10 1 f I,(, ..� ^ N yAYE. 1 W. ' . i _ 1z'�',. � " ' '. .. , u . �, ,r e�SH�,✓,�^ci+,�..'i . � 3 � `. _ r�` � x� Y': '. ,. . i. � n � : '; � i �� v ��• ,� u:� �� 2 I '. `.. ew �� F•s V z � j O � ,�- '' �" �, : $ N :��° � -4 J . 3 =� .. , e SUB. N0. 103 , ; ui �. y' e + � �ln:, � 3 ,� .:,. ,,.:, ,`, 's .� P =� 6 f, s .n �" /G � 9'• T .; ,.— ; Q : ._ _ : ;o,. �: , � , ..w ir .� � �„ ,;Z � � � i� . . . ,. , ,. • � B � a I Q � � � 1 ` /4 U� p /I � // � /0 l3 t. � i:n � ��:,' ,iesissirP4,. BiVD.� — : N � 5� �� . � � � � � . � . �i�3� �' ,.�,.�"' ,.�. BI: I� y�e ��v zo .. zr ��1' �!.' E y � �IJw1°RM RE � 1 �: Y �j 1 . C. f I - � , �pr�J'� ;r � U � l' �/�J•' E�� _.� :! 4�5 . ��'t,� ��/} . �:.+ �/ �-P.�. �-� iT p�� • V . �,�. r/. ✓r,. � �� y NOs 10 ISREV. �. � � 4' .«�µw"`'� ✓t CITY OF �^ � I� wiJ{�E � � �� L+ M"'N. � :- , . ON RAP103 ""' J . � `l i F��t S U4 S � � �1 !1r✓.M� � L . �� CO �,.-.:.�,. � �\ ... - .. Q J et �-rt ..i 1 � .1 � r . .. - .. .. .. � .._T�. O i t � 1;Y r'r � 1 1 af "'�� t f1�Y pF � , r I-. � � .. rM e N r, i y�,<,,(' ..( I�,. .� . RIDLEY � � + y�� „ � r� y _ �11 `;1 {n o .y yr�nr✓ r �� I � ... � a� .. EV �AI.Q, ^ �UBQ 1 Qll^.'r✓ §�` � + � a. � 1•'�� ... ��,�{' .. �la R 10 � � . �-�l� � � f 1 �� 1FL•-'-1� 1 . 7 °' '^a 21 � p ��1� � I �S i � ��r�' t � � ,..�^�M'?'�l . . �; ti- , � A D . ;%;,,...�Ji _ � �2324 + �2b�i J .- s u ' � i ,..'� . �-�1 � .. .� �y� �,..1 ��: �•y� � �,. �t � i , . inw4I17M .-� � sT [r `i � wt uM?��~� r � � � 1�.1r� t P'�"'..r/M"o.�! "f 'r �C/p U�NAf{ N�RW,�L � 1.�' p (� 1 wM �. �. 1 9 I; • j 1 i �}✓ � I� Q � � n�M '' �� d�y"° . �, i �. � E � .,�� wDDIT/ON . �. � � �' . . rT -.,+ W � � ' g _ j1 rr± ' � Y� m^ , ` � 1 �, � � '�'�'r' °b' ...�..� w...�. n �!'� i , + � ! i� ��y✓ ; e � �y.�.W'..'� 4�� '�. .' , � � � 1. �- � ', I i Oyi ��r,r�%�}��'' '' I�K � 1 1' �.. 4 '�' 'c� ��rir� r'5..,.. �w""r^•+wrn,++w Y (/1 �'' r'r''' �� r �' '� �t'r T � � � .. w Y�R": ,, � �. „ , „�.}�i, - ; - �,��$. " �� , ,. ' u �r r � v� Y ' '* r , \ ` � � � 1 � 1 �. 1 � .. y �R�r .��. S' �i�. 4 . F41 MON "�' i � . � • FU . 1 V �n ' • ' i . �1�J,,' s< ��.' .. r. i '{t � n, - "_,_. � y � �fJ� 1��t • i � . ' F � �� '� }.. . � . r� �� r � � / ��` 11�� ' � � � ��• �8�! � v' � � � "� �� ; :: , � '� r � � � � � - ..Z� r'•.i � .. s :. � • ' : n , 1 1 ' � �rY� STRE y _'�t. �CI CLE � * � z (J' z .� . .t.. . �rrr ^��K,p "� ` , • /r +� t •CiRRE �: � � iN e ei'r � � �T 1� . • i ?� •i4 srs.e ♦ �'a � �� , ., a� . F. •� , ,. t! . - . _ .: N� �� . r NdRMO . . ` . ' �f '"t.p 1 � .' ' ,�� + � c[rsu C 1 "��. 1. ....� Nc J . � , . �� . C � ..- -; s t- . MM 1. � . . {��1��11� _ � SP #84-13 MCCK Proper�ies 441 Hugo I 26 COON � . : -. , - - Z°'JSt�s�--�'p-�� ..�.�.: \:' ' - - � � CITY TNOMPSON�� H�VERV/EW /�EiGHfS a ft, i P � �� II � � —� ., :C)71�� • � �� . • .,- � i, 1 �:PC1 � ... �� p °.` � 1�M� � ��4�4•i � Af `� �w ►>- �� !�i � — � � — a� , .c•r�r � L�� 0 r � � ' � ---- , � --T � -, - t� r--� _;�y,' ? � � �x�t S ;,,�4',r . � � � � �_.= .' '� .. J; `• � � � ,,� _ � ": � ;._�3 � ;:,,; `' 3 �, '�_i � � ^ 1 r; rT� � . { �� r-� � \ ��'�� ' 4.. °� - , .. � - ". S�• 'j -' �. J � � ,..� a _ � r.� w' ' -� �� '� � `� +' ` i r 9 � , � , v� � c1. �^, �n ^ + : � _ S c./ � ('�. z ' � 1 4 � � �S.^ � � ' 1 � v , l _ � j � .. � �' ,�• �� O F �;- � � �� --, , v " r-. ^� f' �. ; -. ` , .�, 4: '. µ �+: �� ,.� � f',J , � � � '. , _ ~ '�� ^ . �' .. 3 "' ; ti y , � i '� ) i; -^' i..: J• :, ;..: s �.; / 5� � � �'"�� °a j/// �ONTON REET � J c /// )UI �" H R L- o I—' J J � r F , � , D � � � /� / : � � / 'a e� 3 E�I s � �� : / �- � T ., . � : : . �.i /f � � � � L: / �/ ♦I ♦ ' � v I'�� , . . 1 �R�' u ''�' V � �♦ � I �J[` d � ♦ �IC�r'� � ti r K � �_ � � I �. r�% �`,��,., �' �¢ ��o� � Z � � [�r c��. � ELY � �0 . 9 � p � ��D�f i /7/ 1' o i e � :,, R � � P Q��. � ♦ iiocRTY �� I, � 571 • •� • � .� � �' ' �� a�d' i .� ��i. - . �� `�^ ��.'� �x �,.yep K1�y� •-i c y,a� ��t�„'��, '�"� i '�`'�'�m� f�,.g:. c+,,, ° � � �� e.� `' ki... �y�". .°yl��k",+ -. 4i� ,. ..: �� '�'�4�'i,M' `�y�. • � '},. �lr�. ' . ..� l ; ➢ � �T tYF£. . � `.1. y,� + Y � � �� 5'� � . • f :. Y �� ! � � � j� . M�kF{ �., J.f T4 p:✓a i P ��, t ,s�-W ir' w'�.'.•��LL�. ,�� °[+�'�•�.i��; �;�:�,}3$�� 4 = � YS4� ��:9 �� y fiav�[ t�. ..'r !'C kz � • . ,�+, y .w y . . ] ., T. ._�Y ��p �.�• rl r T� �'4�' Wi•�� +t�+T '4t,f: ,, �t� 4 t s i� �,.�al F�^.'; 1' � , j^.;�~�,.�•,>�i s. �s;�: �,�E 4y.r "?} ?�j`j � . `- ♦YK �'ff" .d, � ,li �` ... .. _. i '� t� yr r� �"!. � I �y � 1�'i � ��'r� �, �5�� j 5�� w.. + 'i.�tt4•','�J r�v y '. ,;.i �� -� tr��'� g� t � �j 2 - - `v�::� � `ti� ` .+,r �.�5� '�,r -; s � `�', j'� �"�Fq.• � ' 7p�l.pG/li'R�i+.`.. � �`� ` s R� t pG $9 ' ` z r �' '' yy � f��Y'ad,9 / � •� +L�,'p�q��J � � 1 R�+'m ."5� }l�' j� �-m r �p Y i{ w� .F r �"� f 1� 1� ��,;� . �,�;,.>5`.T � t5�� %- '�.�'r � ��:j]; � ;<r��:: 4. ��,�y�� A .y �..� x ,.��rk:ip �� t � 'k -+4 r,r £ m �Y �� i..' �W i�• �i�� , 1r~ �'�"��r � �A � ,�� , . �� 4 �r, � .-,,r� ��, ,� �� ,� �{� p y��] ��,`. � a�`3� �sa ��N�iiSr fY4 . �vd'�'Jx�y.i � � "+' "`'i.',� . � � � •�� j n t " ,f �wic �� a.�� '�'s��3r. �'CtiY% ;;;6 ".� t�-, �"j` _ p r . , _ f�� }.: ro � �' g� : Y. t;�`i �,. � �' . , Y� �� i �� v . V �'�c' _ ._ ' ' 'a.n::�...:�Y+-�%`'�! � ��.� ' ,�Sy.-...-.e'� �+� r i-t�' ` �S t.�� T .. t . � ��Y S� ,�.�Y'�.f..,w-.... . ��l f� a;)- F~ .�i ../!� �l'� L. y+n�f -,%.i�w d°. r ,'•.,3s?� qi rsr a �a '-• .,� p . e.ii € �!, ��'.�y, � Y � r � '>- �'� �=:�y, .x ��Y Jc 'y`��ia�W � �} ,4-� rr is ` ��T l r� �'7 ' t C`' 4� � M � l� ` (. 1 i."V %��J� 4�.: .-"�. c , � � N m i ' 1T � `, � '. � r ti i v>� 'r� � �.4 rr r; t� 'yM7�" 1 ...�,�....'^ �'.ntSi..ry. i _�..nn. _....w., �� '.� �t.�. f'�� '�� . '...is ,.'n.�� i � �� SP #84-13 MCCK PMO ext$e 441 Hu ' Pr�� r' 28 _ _ . 4 . ,_��. _ � o ' � " .. � _ � . .. »__ — -� w -_ __ _� _-- .. - a56' `� � , I_ ; . ,'i � � I t. \ y a . ; . \ �� . io . . � y CS \ O o _ ♦�3[ L"1.n p� � I �J T � . 1 ._�. .. -' -, . i X y _ � \" \ _ _ �.. � f �i ` \ e . ,, ,�-_ .� -- , � 4 � =:� �.� � � � � � � � � � � � N, � � �� '; � i \�--9.�--,;- — i�. o�a � Q--O.�,.___—+'. 1� � � � i - � � �. � , , � _ .'�. � � � � � � �; ; �� . � � � � ' o I � � O.� 1 �I I � / / � � � �` i I / �. � , ,. ,. � � � � ,� ' ` r ' '�' 1� ��' � ; i! � ' � " � � 1 � � y � �, : I , �� i � / � � � /f g` � �' J '� �s ' P / ' /� � . .� � � 1 � g � /� / % � ) / J.-� _ i � / // / ; i � � (i ! ' � i t� ,i Y I i � p � � � ' � � ' �� " � � '� � . gr /� �� a �j � � � � t I / , i i _ � � , � i � � � _—�_ .i.-' q.n -�/ — �oc � _—_ � o'u � / � ; �Q �,��__ � � ;-,- .� , , � _ � I - � ` � `� l - .�. / 7 _ O / � `��+ � `// � "T Cy%� `�1 ,il .� ` � �� • I �/ � �� , / J �' •/. "— ��'S�'y _ i' //� - J- „ " . a�" �/ � .��_ __._— - ��- CITY Of FRIDLEY HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEE7ING JUNE 7. 1984 ' � CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Minton ca7led the June 7. 1984, Human Resources Commission meeting to order at 7:38 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Bob Minton, Arlie Niemi, Brian Goodspeed. Peter Treuenfels, Barbara Kocher Members Absent: None Others Present: Bill Hunt, Administrative Assistant Mary Beverage� representing Anoka County Historical Society APPROVAL OF MAY 3, 1984, HUMAN RESOURCES COhMISSIOtJ MItJU7E5: MO2ION BY MR. TREUENFEIS� SECONDED BY MS. KOCXER� TO APPROVE THE MAY 3� 2984, HUMAN RESDURCES COMMISSION MZNUTES AS WRSTTEN, UPON R VOSCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRPERSON MZN21�N DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANZNOUSLY. 1. OLD BUSINE55: a, Banfill House Progress Report Mr. 600dspeed siated that one of the goals in the Cortmission's 1984 work plan was to look at the possibility of restoring and refurnishing the Banfill Tavern. He stated one of the action items was to invite a representative from the Anoka County Historical Society to a Comnission meeting to discuss the project and find out what state the house is in at this time. Ms. Mary Beverage stated the Anoka County Historical Society Board meets on the same night each month as the Human Resources Commission, so she was asked to come to the Comnission meeting as a representative of the Anoka County Historicat Society. Ms. Beverage handed out copies of the "John Banfilt Tavern Restoration & Planning Study, comnissioned in 1980 by Mi71er 8 Dunwiddie Architects, Inc. She stated she felt everything the Commission needed to know about the house was in this study. HUMAN RESOURCES COF47ISSION MEETING JUNE 7 1984 PAGE 2 Ms. Beverage stated that in the study, it is recortmended that a restora- tion and historical architect be hired to see what types of changes have been made over the past 137 years before startirig to "pretty up" the house, and that the work be conducted under a restoration architect. Ms. Beverage stated she was a tour guide of the fiouse for three sumners so she has a sense of the history of the house. She stated that many of the windows are the original windows from 1848. These windows are gradually being destroyed as people break into the house, so now the windows are boarded up. She stated it is morale-destroying to see this happening. She stated the house inside is in a generally deteriorated condition. Mr. Minton stated that if another group in the camnunity wanted to do sane- thing as a project to help restore the house, what would the Anoka County Historical Society recomnend for such a project? Ms. Beverage stated she could not answer that question, 7he Comnission would have to address that question to the Anoka County Historical Society Board, Ms. Beverage stated to restore a building like this just for museum purposes was not done too �ch any more because of the cost to maintain it. Mr. Treuenfels stated he would like to have sane idea of what money would be available and spendable for a project like this and what could be done. He was not sure what the Commission could do by themselves; they would have to look at the cooperation of other groups. Mr. Hunt asked Ms. Beverage that, in her opinion, what would be a suitable end use for the Banfill Tavern? Ms. Beverage stated she would suggest it be used for purposes similar to the Springbrook Nature Center--as a resource center and for educational purposes. Mr. Minton stated there was no doubt that this building was a valuable asset to the City of Fridley. Mr. Goodspeed stated Me saw the restoration of this building as being right in the heart of the City's Comprehensive Plan and a goal local 9overnment is trying to generate: a feeling of community and the feeling of belonging to Fridley. Mr. Minton stated the citizens of Fridley really don't have much of a sense of connection with the past. and this would be a valuable asset for facilitating that. Mr. Goodspeed stated he felt the next step for the Cortmission was to read the study carefully for discussion at the next meeting. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 7 7984 PAGE 3 Mr. Minton suggested the Commission ask the Anoka C anty Historical Society Board if they had a plan of things that needed to be done in the house and list them in the order these things should be done so if various organizations are interested in helping in the restoration process. a plan would be available to show what things could be done. The Carmnission members thanked Ms. Beverage for coming to the meetin9. Ms. Beverage thanked the Cortmission members for their interest in the Banfill Tavern, b. Consideration of Seat Belt Safety and Child Restraints Ms. Kocher stated that after the last discussion on this subject with Officer Gary Lenzmeier of the Fridley Police Department, she had the distinct feeling this would go nowhere because the law really has no teeth. She stated that if the Comnission was still really concerned about the safety of children. she would be in favor of inviting Senator pon Frank to a Cortmission meeting and let him know their concerns. Mr, Treuenfels stated it would be interesting to have Senator Frank come to a meeting to explore this further, Perhaps Senator Frank could explain why this law was written the way it was. Mr. Hunt stated Senator Frank might have sane suggestions on what the Comnission could do. Mr, Minton asked Ms. Kocher to contact Senator Frank and invite him to the next Carmission meeting, c. Consideratian of Disaster Preparedness, especially the Emergency Weather Warning System Mr. Hunt handed out copies of a memo from Tim Turnbull dated May 31, 1984, on the subject of "Emergency Outdoor Warning System Update". In the memo, Mr. Turnbull stated that the old mechanical sirens may be replaced with new electronic sirens, but there has been no formal action by the City Councit about replacing the old sirens with the electronic sirens. Mr. Hunt stated it was possible there might be a demonstration of this new equipment. At that time. the Comnission could attend the demonstra- tion and if they were agreeable with the new sirens, the Comnission could go on record supporting the new electronic system. Mr. Treuenfels stated he thought it might be a good idea to look into the new sirens. He would be interested in knowing the cost of the new electronic sirens. Mr. Minton asked Mr, Hunt to get more information on the electronic system� specifically,cost and capabilities. HUMAN RESOURCES COh�1ISSI0N MEETING, JUNE J, 1984 PAGE 4 d. Latch Key Program e. Ms. Kocher stated she had again contacted Tan Myhra.� Mr, Myhra had indicated previousiy that he would send a flyer to every home in Fridley to see if there was any interest in a latch key program in the City, Mr. Myhra stated he had only sent the flyer to random hanes in the comnunity. He had received a 33% return of those sent aut, but he did not say how many had been sent out. She stated Mr. Myhra had said there was not an overwhe7ming response for a latch key program, but he still felt there was a need for such a program. He had stated the YMCA was looking into the possibi7ity of running a latch key program, and there would be a meeting on June 21 to discuss that possibility. Ms. Kocher stated Mr, Myhra had also said that Carol Fuller, the new President of the Community Education Council, would be attending a seminar and she would put a priority on meeting with otfier comnunities that have successful latch key programs. Ms, Kocher stated she had also contacted the Learning Tree and spoke with the Director, Bonnie Clausen. Ms. Clausen stated they had sane calls fran Columbia Heights residents but oniy 2-3 a year from Fridley residents, Ms. Clausen stated the Learning Tree is offering a latch key program, The rate is based on a half day (4 hrs.) before and after schoo7 and includes breakfast and a snack, The children are bused to and from schoo7. 7he rate is $38/week plus $10 for busing, totalling $48/week. Mr, Minton asked Ms. Kocher to cali the YMCA to verify that they are considering a latch key program. Ms. Niemi stated she would like to see the Canmission continue its interest in the ]atch key program, Oiscussion was continued until the next meeting. Consideration of Progress on Yarious Items in the 1984 Work Plan The Commission members reviewed the work plan to determine progress and what items shou]d be put on the next agenda for discussion. Under the "Public 5afety" goa], Objective N7 was "To become appraised of PoTice/Community relations". The Commission members agreed to invite Liz Chevalier to a Cammission meeting to discuss the Police Department's involvement with the community/schools. Under the "Housing" goal, Objective A1 was "To achieve Fridley representation on the Anoka County Carmunity Housing Resources Board•�� Mr, Goodspeed stated he would try to contact a realtor before the next meetfng to see if there was any interest in representing Fridley on this Board. HUMAN RESOURCES__C_OMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 7 1984 PAGE 5 Under the "Housing" goal. Objective N2 was to "Review present status of tav/medium housing in fridley•'Nr, Minton asked Mr. Nunt to get a report on the present status of low/medium housing in. the City of Frid7ey. He stated he would also like an update on the status of condo conversion in the City of Fridley. Mr. Minton stated a P7anning Carmission member had suggesied the Human Resources Co�renission look into an affirmative action plan for the City of Fridley with regard to women, How many women are employed in the City of Fridley. is there an affirmative action plan regarding women, etc,? Mr. Hunt stated he would get that information for the Comnission by the August meeting. f. League of Minnesota Human Rights Comnissions' 13th Annual Meeting on June 23, 1984 Mr, Treuenfeis stated he would like to attend this meeting. , MOTZON BY MS, NZEMI� SECOlJDED BY MR, GOOASPEED� THAT TXE CITY REIMBURSE MR, TREUENFEZS $30 FOR THE CQST TO ATTEND THE MINNESOTA LERGUE OF HUMAN _ RIGHTS COMMISSIONS' 13TH ANNUAL MEETZNG ON JUNE 23� 1984� AT THE COLLEGE ^ OF ST. THOMAS. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSQN MINTON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANZMOUSLY, g. Next Meeting Date Mr, Minton stated the next Cortmission meeting was Thurs., July 5. He stated he would not be ab]e to attend that meeting and wanted to know if the Canmission members would want to cansider another date. The Canmission members agreed to change the meeting date from July 5 to Thurs., July 12. They also agreed to change the meeting time from 7:30 p.m, to 7:00 p.m, on a regular basis. ADJOURNMENT• MOTZON BY HR. TREUENFELS, SECONDED BY XR. GOOASPEED,�Tp ADJOURN THE AIEETING. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� RLL VOTINC AYE, CHASRPERSqN MZNTON DECLARED TNE JUNE 7� 1984� 6UMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:30 P.M. Respectfully sub itted, y Saba Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIQLEY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 18, 1984 . CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Kondrick called the June 18, 1984, Parks & Recreation Commission meeting to order at 7:39 p.m. ROLL CALL: Menbers Present: Dave Kondrick, Mary Schreiner, Oan A11en Members Absent: Dick Young, Steve Nelson Others Present: Char7es Boudreau, Parks & Recreation Director Jack Kirk, Recreation Supervisor Step6en Eggert, 1080 Hathaway Lane, President, Fridley Jaycees Mark McCown, 5701 Central Avenue, Fridley Jaycees Randy Johnson, 75 Rice Creek Way, Dare to Care Stan Noggie, 5800 East River Road. #302, Dare to Care APPROVAL OF �1AY 14, 1984, PARKS & RECREATION COMI4ISSION MINUTES: MOTION By MS, SCHREINER� SECONDED BY MR. ALLEN� TO APPROVE THE MAY 14� 1984� PARKS B.RECREATION COMMISSZON MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON R VDZCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYfi, CHAZRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, APPROVAL OF AGENDA: The following item was added to the agenda under "Other Business": a. Request from Redeemer Lutheran Church Chairperson Kondrick declared the agenda approved as amended. He also stated that since the representatives from "Dare to Care" were at the meeting, that item would be first oo the agenda. 1. DARE TO CARE SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT REQUEST: Dr. Boudreau stated the City had received a request fran "Dare to Care", a Fridley-based non-profit organization to host a softball tournament for the weekend of August 24-26. At the last meeting, since no one really knew what this organization was all about, the Commission tentatively approved the request but asked that representatives from the organization come to this meeting so the Comnission could learn a little bit more about the organization. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 18, 1984 PAGE 2 Mr. Stan Noggle and Mr. Randy Johnson were at the meeting as representatives of "Dare to Care", �- Mr. Noggle stated this organization began about two years ago. They want to reorganize it to hold musical concerts with top entertainment fran a11 over the country and localty in order to raise funds for non-profit human service organizations. At the present time, they are trying to hold fundraiser-type events to raise the funds for the first concert. Ms. Schreiner asked if the organization had any experience in holding musical concerts. Mr. Noggle stated the organization per se has not had any experience with these concerts, but they do have a lot of experience within the organization with other types of events, so they have a lot of experience to draw from. He stated he has had some experience from his high school days as a stage manager, and he has constant company involvement with extracurricu7ar activities with his company which is Piper, �affray. Ms. Schreiner asked how many people were involved in Dare to Care. Mr. Noggle stated they do not have the natural membership type of thing developed yet. They have seven people on the Board of Directors at this time, and they have had donations from over 350 people. Fifty people are already involved with fundraising events which do not include the softball tournaments. Ms. Schreiner asked what the funds that are raised would be used for. Mr, Noggle stated their funds will go to human service-type organizations once they start putting on the concerts. Right now they are trying to raise the money to put on the first concert. Once they get started, they hope to become a self-sustaining type of organization where each concert will help support the next concert. Mr, Noggle stated that once funds are avai]ab7e, they will let the human service organizations know that money is available. They have a person who has worked on nine different Board of Directors and has had previous experience in proposals and allocation. This person wi71 be charge of proposals and allocations and will make suggestions to the Dare to Care's Board of Directors as to what organizations are qualified for these types of funds and then the Board will decide where the funds will go. Ms. Schreiner asked if other members of the organization lived in Fridley. _ Mr. Noggle stated that practially all those involved either lived in Fridley or in the northeast area. Mr. Noggle stated they have the tournament pretty weii organized. He stated they have some very good people involved. PARKS 8 RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 18 1984 PAGE 3 Mr. Kirk stated that Mr. Noggle, Mr. Johnson, and a couple of other people were at the tournament over the weekend to look at the facility and ask questions as far as equipment and facility use. He stated they still have to get together if the tournament request is officially approved by the Commission in order to outline equipment needs and set the timetable for getting everything set up. Dr. 8oudreau stated that since this is a non-profit organization and since there are no other tournament requests for this one remaining open weekend, Staff would recanmend that the Dare to Care organization be allowed to run a tournament on Aug. 24-26, MOTZON BY MS. SCFIREINER� SECONDED BY MR. RLLEN� TO APPROVE THE SOFTBALL RbURNAMENT REQUEST FROM "DARE TO CARE" TO HOLD A TOURNAMENT ON THE WEEKEND OF AUGUST 24-26, 2984, UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE� CHRIRPERSON KONDRZCK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. DIRECTOR`S REPORT: a. Lighting at Community Park Dr. Boudreau stated Mayor Nee had received a letter from Mrs. ,Ludke's who is a resident west of the tracks from the new community park. She was concerned about the brightness of the lights and that the 7ights lit up the neighborhood to the point where it looked like dayiight. Dr. Soudreau stated the park foreman, the lighting company representative, and he toured the area one evening last week. He stated the lights are bright and do reflect into the neighborhood. He stated that taking every- thing into account, this was something they knew was going to happen, because there are six ball diamonds in the park. Dr. Boudreau stated he has answered Mrs. .Ludke's letter stating that the City is aware of the glare of the lighti� into the neighborhood and have tried scheduling games on certain fie7ds on certain nights to help reduce any negative impact on the neighborhood. The lighting company representative has said they can get some light deflectors that are added to the bottom of the light that somewhat deflects the giare. _ Dr. Boudreau stated that no matter what is done, short of turning off the lights, the ]ights are going to be there and are going to be visible. Dr. Boudreau stated it was his thought that this complex was designed and developed as a major athletic complex for the City of Fridley for the simple reason that they wanted to remove organized activities from the neighborhood parks. He felt they had accomplished that. They are servicing around 1500 participants (adults and youth) per week at the complex, PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETIN6 JUNE 18 1984 PAGE 4 Dr. Boudreau stated he has talked to other people in that neighborhood, and they have said the lights are bright but they can live with them. He stated they try to turn the 19ghts off by ]1 p.m.� He stated he tried ' to explain to Mrs. Luedtke that they will be doing these things to attempt to reduce the impact on the neighborhood and wili continue to do whatever they can. Dr, Boudreau stated he also believed that as the foliage, vines, trees, etc., become more dense, this will reduce the impact on the neighborhood as less light will be reflected into the neigfiborhood. Dr, Boudreau stated he had brought this to the Commission's attention for their information. b. 49'ers Day Softbal7 Tournament Dr. Boudreau stated they were only able to get 16 teams instead of 32. 7he tournament was rained out on Saturday, but Mr. Kirk rescheduled and got all the games in on Sunday. Even with the bad weather, the tourna- ment was successful. Mr, Allen stated Mr. Kirk did an excellent job in handling the tournament under sane bad circumstances with the bad weather. He stated he felt there was a good mixture of teams, fairly low key, and everyone seemed to have a good time. Dr. Boudreau stated the Jaycees were very helpful with concessions and in supplying trophies for the teams. He stated he hoped the Jaycees would be willing to cooperate with the City again next year. He stated some of the members or the �aycees have said they might like to help with sane improvements in the park as far as picnic tables, bleachers, playground equipment, etc. Mr, Kondrick asked Mr. Eggert and Mr. McCown what their impression was of the new community park. Mr. McCown stated it has the capability of being the best facility at least on the north end of town. He stated that for a first year, it was really exceptional. It was really going to do a lot for the City of Fridley. Mr. Eggert stated sane of the things the Jaycees noticed lacking at the comnunity park was an area for the little children. Some of the Jaycees live on the other side of the tracks and they are concerned about the children and tracks and trains. They are concerned with access to the fields across the tracks, and they might get invoived in the promotion of sane sort of activity that would deal with that probiem, Dr. Boudreau stated he thought access to *he park across the tracks was a concern and a problem, but the County has plans to put the bikeway/ walkway under the tracks by Locke Lake. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING JU"�E 18 1984 PAGE 5 Mr. Kondrick stated the Parks & Recreation Comnission was happy to have tfie Jaycees piay in one of the City-sponsored tournaments. He stated they were very grateful to the Jaycees for their interest and care in --• the community and the comnunity's parks. Dr. Boudreau stated the Jaycees have paid for the repainting of the Puppet Wagon that was damaged last year in a storm, The Jaycees built the wagon and donated it to the City, The Jaycees also have iheir name on two scoreboards at the canmunity park. He stated the Jaycees have helped the City with a lot of projects, and the City has had a very congeniai working reiationship with them. In the eight years he has been with the City of Fridley, this group, along with some other groups, has been very helpful to the Parks & Recreation Department. The City thanked the Jaycees for their help. Mr. Eggert stated their charter membership is growing again. It is up to 80 members and shooting for 9D. He stated they need to provide the members with projects they can relate to in the community, and he would encourage the Canmission to think of them when different projects come up. c. Sumner Program Dr. Boudreau stated the surtmer program started that day with the play- grounds. He stated some of the other activities started the first of June, Once again, he would like to encourage the Comnission members to stop by and visit sane of the programs that are going on and talk to the leaders. He stated it really meant a Tot to the young people ieading these programs. d, Rice Creek School Site Dr. Boudreau stated that evident7y, the people who were willing to sell some land to the City for a park in the Gena-Rae Addition have become unwilling sellers. He stated he and Councilman Schneider both testified in front of the owners' attorney and court reporter as to the need for a park area in the Rice Creek School area. He stated he would be going to court the following day with the City Attorney to testify once again as to why there is a need for park land in that Gena-Rae area. He stated he did give as testimony some of the conversations held by the Commission on what the Commission thought was needed in this area. Dr. Boudreau stated he would keep the Comnission informed about the negotiations on that parcel of land for the development of a park. Dr. Boudreau stated the City did salvage its park equipment from the Rice Creek School site and it will be used again in another location. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING �UNE 18 1984 PAGE 6 2. NEW BUSINESS: a. Comnunity Park Concessions � Dr. Boudreau stated the Canmission members had a copy of a proposal to provide concessions for the camnunity park from Roger Christenson, 6750 Main St. N.E, Mr. Christenson owns the Fridley Bus Service and for the past 2-3 years has had a little wagon he sells concessions out of. When the community park started this year, the City was not ready to go in with concessions for the first week or two, so Mr. Christenson ran his wagon in the parking lot until the City was ready to open up for business. Dr, Boudreau stated this apparently prompted Mr. Christenson to make a telephone call to him wanting to know if the City was going to be in the concession business or what the City was going to do with con- cessions. He stated he told Mr. Christenson that if he had any ideas about running concessions, he would be willing to present this to the Comnission. Dr, Boudreau stated this is just a preliminary proposal that said Mr. Christenson would get the concession stand up to the standards of the Anoka County Health Dept. Mr. Christenson is willing to run the concession stand with the term of the contract being through Dec. 31, 1985, with the City realizing 15% of the gross that is brought in. Dr. Boudreau stated he had a few things that should be discussed and possibly changed in the proposal: (1) What happens to concessions on tour•nament weekends? Who runs the concessions--Mr. Christenson? The s�onsor of the tournament? (2) A cancellation clause that if the service is not there, the contract will not run until 1985. Mr. Inman, Director of Central Services, is going to find out if they can legally entertain this kind of motion without going out for quotes or bids. (3) The City may want to wait until after this year to take a good look at whether the City wishes to continue running the concessions itself. Mr. Kondrick agreed with Dr. Boudreau. He stated it was premature at this point to gc with anyone else. There were areas that needed to be explored and the Canmission would know more after a year or so of operation. Mr. Eggert stated that from the Jaycees perspective, had they known they _ would not be able to run the food concession going into their tournament, it would not have been as attractive for them. They wcu7d real7y have to sit down and take a good look at the numbers. Dr. Boudreau stated if the City goes with the concessions and has food, the building has to be brought up to the Anoka County Department's codes. They have to have a commercial refrigerator, gas stove, seal and paint the floor, mopboards around the floor, etc. So, there are a lot of things the City would have to do that organizations do not have to do to sell food for a 3-day weekend tournament. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 18 1984 PAGE 7 Mr. Allen stated he also felt it was far too early to consider a proposal of this kind, and the proposal as set up was far too exclusive. He stated more than half the attraction of people having tournaments is �" having the ability to sell food and beer. He felt they first have to take care of those peop7e running the tournaments, particularly those groups who help support the City. He would recommend they table discussion of this proposal until a later time. Dr. Boudreau stated this was merely a preliminary proposal, and he was sure Mr. Christenson would be open to negotiations. He would also recanmend this be tabled for further consideration at a Comnission meeting in Dec./Jan. 1985. The Comnissioners agreed to table discussion on the community park concessions until the Comnission meeting in January 1985. 3. OLD BUSINESS: a. 1985 Capital Outlay Request Dr. Boudreau stated that at the last Coromission meeting, he had asked the Comnission members that if they had any ideas for capital outlay items for 1985 that these be submitted by June 15. He stated he had not received any suggestions so he was assuming the Cormnission was happy with what has happened in the past and how Staff has organized the capital outlay. Dr. Boudreau stated he will consolidate Mr. Kirk's, Mr. Dahlberg's, and Mr.St. Clair's requests into the capital outlay budget for 1985. He will give the Comnission copies of this. He stated he will be meeting with the City Manager within the next month to go over the capital outlay budget. He would guess they are looking at basically the same artrount of dollars as last year for capital outlay--somewhere around $140-170,000. 4. OTHER BUSINESS: a. Request from Redeemer Lutheran Church Dr. Boudreau stated Redeemer Lutheran Church is interested in the southern end of the City's land at Edgewater Gardens Park to increase the size of the church parking lot. The Church has requested that they trade three lots which lie south of Mississippi St. for the southern part of this park. Dr. Boudreau stated he wrote the follaving letter to the City Manager: "While I can fully appreciate the request from Redeemer Lutheran Church to trade parcels of land lying south of Mississippi St. for the southern portion of Edgewater Gardens Park, I stronqly believe this action would be detrimental to our park system. As the attached outline will attest, we have attempted to cooperate with the church by adjusting and PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 78, 1984 PAGE 8 compromising in the past. However, to trade land would do nothing more than create another small, isolated, unusable parcel of park property. As you are sure7y aware, the land in question was de�eloped to service .. the residents of the Edgewater area and to fill a void in this neighbor- hood. It is being deve7oped in keeping with the recomnendations outlined in our Comprehensive Park Plan. This open area of land on the south end of Edgewater serves as a free play area and indeed complements the existing tennis court and playground equipment already established. In addition, Anoka County has developed part of their east/west bikeway/ waikway system through this area with the belief that this land would be utilized for park purposes. To do differently would not be in the best interests of either the County and/or the City. I wil7 present this matter to the Parks & Recreation Commission on Monday, June 18, for their consideration. If their opinion differs from mine, I will be happy to provide a copy of their discussion as it relates to this area." Dr. Boudreau stated, again, he would reiterate that they have worked for years to get a park into that isolated neighborhood and to now take a parcel of it for a parking lot was not in the best interest of the residents and/or the City's park plan. The Cormnissioners concurred with Dr. Boudreau's statements. ADJOURNt1ENT: MOTION BY MS, SCHREINER� SECpNDED BY MR, ALLEN� TO ADJOURN T!!E MEETING. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRPERSQ'J KONDRSCK DECLARED THE MOTION CRRRIED UNANZMOUSLY. Respectfully sub 'tted, � :.0 Lynn Saba Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEY ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMdIS5I0N MEETING -« JUNE 19, 1984 CAII 70 ORDER: Chairperson Nielson called the June 19, 1984, Environmental Quality Commission meeting to order at 7:39 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present Members Absent: Otliers Preseni: Maynard Nielson, Wayne Wellan, Richard Svanda� Tom Gronlund Bruce Peterson Jim Robinson, Planning Specialist Michae) Trdan, Project Director, Minneapolis Recycling Program Connie Metcalf, SORT Recycling APPROUAL OF htAY 15, 1984, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTZON BY MR. SVANDA� SECOtlDED BY HR. WELLAN� TO APPROVE TNE MAY I5� 1984� ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRZTTEN. UPON R VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON NIELSON DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRTED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. GUEST SPEAKER: MICNAEL TRDAN, PROJECT DIRECTOR, MINNEAPOLIS RECYCLING PRQGRAM: Mr, Trdan stated he was with the Minneapolis Recycling Program which was part of the Public Works Department. He was formerly with the Minneapolis Planning Department until about two years ago. He stated his purpose at the meeting was to tell the Commission members what they are doing in Minneapolis and explain how the p�ogram originated, what the funding sources were, what the operation is like, and generally give the Comnission members a little back- ground on the need for recycling. He hoped to give them some leads on how this might be applicable to a city like Fridley. With the recent legisiation passed at the state level, he felt that Fridley, as well as any other comnunity in the metro area, is going to have a lot of reasons to pay attention to recycling. Mr, Trdan stated Minneapolis started a city-wide recycling program on Nov. 1, ]983. This was started after a demonstration program that had been in existence for about 16 months. The demonstration program started on June 21, 1982. The primary reason for starting the recycling program was strictly cost. It had to do with the fact tfiat Minneapolis, like a lot of other communities, buries its trash, It is costing Minneapolis $3 million a year to bury their 13Q,000 tons of garbage. It costs $6 million to collect the garbage and $3 million to bury it. for a total disposal cost of $9 million. If they couid just save i0% of the total disposal cosi, that would be $300,000. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 19, 1984 PAGE 2 Mr. Trdan gave a slide presentation to give the Commission members an idea of the operation of the Minneapolis Recycling Program. Mr, Trdan stated Minneapolis had an advantage in approaching recycling in general because they have "organized collection". That meanf the City has taken the responsibi]ity to coordinate the collection of people's garbage cans. Up until 1972, the only garbage trucks in Minneapolis were city-owned, crewed by City employees. Tfiey picked up only what was considered "wet garbage". It was the resident's responsibility to get rid of things like glass, cans, yard waste, etc. Every fall, people would burn their leaves until 1972 when the PCA said yard waste could no longer be burned. At that time, private haulers were picking up the glass and cans, plus the city trucks, so a compromise that was reached was that Minneapolis would provide for the collection of everything in the garbage can. They divided Minneapolis up approximately 50/50 between the city trucks with city crews and private haulers who formed themselves into a consortium called MRI (Mpls. Refuse Inc.). He stated this worked fine when the landfill costs at that time were about $4-5/ton. Mr, Trdan stated the waste in Minneapolis is taken to two locations--one on the north side and one on the south side. The garbage is compacted and loaded into trucks operated by BFI (Browning Ferris Industries) who own a subsidiary called Phoenix who operate the landfills in this region and practially every other region in the U.S. Mr. Trdan stated a pretty good figure for most cities is about 1 ton of garbage for every single family/duplex household. He stated Minneapolis actually produces more than 130,000 tons of garbage because they are only talking about single family/duplex/4-unit ho�seholds. Minneapolis does not pick up garbage for multiple unit buildings or coirenercial, so the total waste for Minneapolis is probably around 250,000 tons per year. Mr. Trdan stated the garbage goes from the transfer station to one of the landfills surrounding the Twin Cities area, about 40 miles away, where the garbage is dumped and buried and in time starts polluting the ground water. However, these were not the major concerns at Minneapolis about 3-4 years ago. What was the major concern was the 7andfill costs. The landfill costs in 1972 were $4-5/ton. About 1979, they were about $12/ton, The current cost this year was $22.06 until March when it went up to $23.76, so there is a rapid'.y escalating disposal cost. So, cost was the major component in the starting of the recycling program. In feb. 1982, the City Council formed a task force to look at a recycling program and contracted with MRI for collection in the southwest part of Minneapolis. Mr. Trdan stated when they started the demonstration phase in June 1982, about 1 out of 6 households voluntarily participated in the program. By the end of the demonstration phase, about 16 months later, nearly 1 out of 4 households were participating in the program. Based on those results, the City Council said that if this could be done city-wide, they should be able to collect that 10% of the waste stream and not only have a service for collecting recyclab]e material fran the homeowner, but be able to break even and pay the cost of any staff in the office and save the city money. The City was divided into 60 different collection routes and 5 different collec- tion districts. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 19, 1984 PAGE 3 Mr. Trdan stated the City knew the contractor could not pick up the material and sell it and break even so they knew the City would have to kick in a subsidy. The City decided to take bids for each of the 5 districts, and r the lowest bid for subsidy from the City to operate would be�awarded each district. The bids ranged from a low of $10.50/ton from a non-profit corporation in the middle part of the city to a high of $17/ton in the northern part, With the $22,06/ton for landfill costs and the fact that the cost was going to continue rising, at the minimum the City would be saving $5/ton and the maximum they would be saving was $11,50/ton. Mr, Trdan stated the Staff at that time knew the program would have to be promoted. They wou7d give out information, go to neighborhood groups, etc., and try to get one person per block put up a recycling sign on the lawn to remind the neighbors that there was a recycling program and when the pick-up was going to be. At that time, a brochure went out describing what to put out, wfiere to put it, and how to do it. Mr, Trdan stated the major items being picked up are newspaper (contributes 70-90% of any given pick-up weight in tons), corrugated cardboard, cereal boxes, aluminum cans, tin cans, aluminum foil, clear glass, brown glass, green glass, and motor oil. They are asking people to separate the recyclables from the normal garbage, save it for a month (or less if they want to drop the recyclables off at a location), and put them out in the alley on their pick-up day in separate bags. Mr. Trdan stated 150 tons were collected in the demonstration phase, and they are now collecting closer to 300 tons in that same area. As a rule of thumb, even with a capita7 intensive operation, 75 tons of recyclables coming from a district will generate one job just to pick it up. Mr. Trdan stated one of the problems Minneapolis has experienced with their recycling program is scavenging. Minneapolis has passed an ordinance to try to discourage this. Another problem has been with some of the garbage collectors taking things clearly marked for recycling and putting them into the garbage trucks. Mr. Trdan stated that even though there are some problems that have to be worked out, they are going to have a program that will collect something like 1,000 tons of recyclables a month. When theprogram started in Nov. 1983, they were co7lecting 476 tons/month. They are now averaging about 550-600 tons/ month, and last April it was almost 800 tons. So they do not have far to go to get that 1,000 tons/month or 12,000 tons a year which is 10% of the 130,000 tons of garbage. Ms. Metcalf asked if the garbage haulers were sympathetic to the recyling program. Mr. Trdan stated the garbage haulers are uneasy about the whole idea of recycling. Right now, they are not avid supporters. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 19, 1984 PAGE 4 Mr. Trdan stated that in the last legislative session, there was a Hazardous Waste Disposai Bill and tacked onto that was an amendment that calls for � an additional surcharge on disposal costs at the landfills. �e thought the cost was 90Q/cubic yard. This is an increased cost to the City of Minneapolis and any other city that buries in the landfill, and it is eventually going to make its way back to the consumer. Mr. Trdan stated the legislature's idea behind this amendment was to create this pool of money that can be used for starting solid waste abate�nt programs. Right now the options are to bury the trash, burn it, or recycle it. Recycling is certainly one of the lowest cost, energy conserving, resource conserving, job producing ways of reducing tlie waste going to the landfills. Mr. Trdan stated that as far as Fridley was concerned, there was going to be a huge pool of money. Through the entire metro area, they are talking about 1 ton per resident--about 1,800,000 tons of garbage being buried at the landfill. If they multiply that by $5, they are talking about a pool of $9 million. If the City has an existing or proposed recycling program start- ing next January, they get an automatic kickback out of that fund of 50� per household. For Fridley, that would be about $6,000. Not everyone has a recycling program. Right now, Richfield has a recycling program in the planning stages, and St. Louis Park and Minneapolis have active programs, So, that will still leave a lot of money. Part of the money will go to the communities that have the landfills and have some water pollutton problems; the other part is going to go to communities that can cane up with grants or proposals to start sanething. Mr. Trdan stated that, unfortunately, what they are not seeing is a 1 to 1 decrease--for every ton of recyclab7es picked up, they would like to see 1 ton of garbage decreased, He thought they eventually would see a ratio of 10 tons of recyclables equal a 7 ton decrease in garbage. Some of it were materials that were previously going to drop-off locations, but an argument on the other side was they are also seeing the drop-off locations having sustaining levels and in sane cases increasing levels of recyclable materials. Mr. Trdan stated Minneapolis is looking at the possibility of mandatory recycling. St. Cloud has a mandatory recycling program. They are also looking at rewarding households for recycling. Mr. Wellan asked how successful the recycling program was for the haulers of the recyclables. Were they making a profit? Mr. Trdan stated that right now, tfiey are pretty close to just breaking even. The haulers have to collect about 10 tons per route per day to make any any income. They estimate about 60 lb. per stop, so that was about 350 households to collect 10 tons. Mr. Wellan asked what impact the refuse burning plant would have on the recycling program. ENVIRONh�NTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETIN6, JUNE 19, 1984 PAGE 5 Mr. Trdan stated the refuse burning plant could affect recycling if they "put all their eggs into one basket" and demand that it have a minimum r capacity of 2,000 ton per day and that it require every t�pe bf canbustible like paper, cardboard, etc. For example, a company like Hoerner Waldorf is displeased to see a plant like this proposed,because they want to see that paper reprocessed into new paper, rather than have it go up in smoke. If they can do RDF (refuse-derived fuel) or generate steam heat or electricity, then it is a different question, but he felt that was down the road in technology. They cannot use the NSP boilers at the Riverside plant without major modifications, and there are still the pollution problems associated with burning things like plastics. He stated they are talking about $250-300 million in construction and operating costs in Hennepin County alone. There are 900,OOD people in Hennepin County. That was almost $300 per person in extra property taxes that are going to have to be paid to build a plant that m� work. Mr. Trdan stated that with a burn facility, they can take in 10 tons of waste, but they end up with 2.5 tons of cinders and ash after burning that still has to be buried. He would urge them to keep it in perspective. Ne stated that they are not going to reduce 50% of the waste stream through recycling, but he thought they could rea7istically reduce it by 20-25%. Recycling is only part of the picture, but so is a burn facility. He definitely felt recycling and a burn facility cou7d be compatible. Mr. Svanda asked Ms. Metcalf how the SORT curbside program in four neigh- borhoods in Fridley was doing. Ms. Metcalf stated the curbside pick-up services terminated last August. The program had been going for 1; years. They had a 20% participation rate. She felt the program had been very successful. Mr. 6ronlund stated it would be interesting to survey the people in those neighborhoods now to see if they are still recycling and if they would be interested in a city-wide recycling program. Mr. Robinson asked Mr. Trdan if the City of Minneapolis had done any survey work. Mr. Trdan stated they did some survey work prior to the demonstration being set up, and once the demonstration was under way, they also did a phone survey. The survey was one of the major reasons they expanded the materia7s being picked up. The residents had a strong desire to have brown glass, green glass, and cardboard picked up. Mr. Svanda stated the Cortmission has been looking at the possibility of doing a survey of a representative sample of the neighborhoods in Fridley to see if there is any interest in recycling and perhaps use the survey as a vehicle to support the concept of a canposting project, He asked Mr. Trdan if he would send the Comnission a capy of the survey done by Minneapolis. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 19, 1984 PAGE 6 Mr. Trdan stated he woutd be glad to send them a copy. Mr. Svanda asked Mr. Trdan what the selling paint to the residents could be o for a city like Fridley where they have a competitive market�F Mr. Trdan stated he really did not know the answer to that question. Mr. Robinson stated that, in reality, the people of Minneapolis are not really realizing any savings either that can be pointed out, They are told that m�_aY6e their taxes won't go up, so maybe there is not that much difference between tl-ie people of Minneapolis and the people of Fridley. Ms. Metcalf stated the publicity has been that the residents of Minneapolis are saving the city money by recycling, It was at least giving the people the feeling they are saving money. The Commissioners thanked Mr. Trdan for coming to the meeting and sharing this information with the Commission. ADJOURNMENT: Chairperson Nielson dectared the June 19, 7984, Environmental Quality Commission meeting adjourned at 9:30 p,m. Respectfully su mitted, � T:..C- ti. yn e Saba Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEY ApPEALS COI�4ffSSI0N MEETING, JUNE 26, 1984 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Gabel called the June 26, 1984, Appeals Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p, m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Pat Gabel, Jim P1eme1, Jean Gerou, A1ex Barna Members Absent: Donald Betzold Others Present: Darrel Clark, City of Fridley G. W. Paschke Gary Geretschlaeger K. C. Ingram Mr. � I�frs. A11en Blomker APPROVAL OF JUNE 12. 1984, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: M(YfION by MS, GEROU, SECONDED BY MR. BARNA, TO APPROVE THE JIJNE 12, 1984, APPEALS COt4ffSSI0N MINUTES AS WRITTEN, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 1. A P] 8050 RANCHER'S ROAD, (Request by G. W. Paschke. 7970 University nue N. E., Fridley, MN 55432) MOTION BY Mt. PLEMEL, SECANDED BY hS. GEROU, �0 OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECIARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:32 P. M. Chairperson Gabel read the Administrative Staff Report: ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 8010 - 8050 Rancher's Road N. E. A, PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.17b, requires a11 parking and hard surface areas to be no closer than 5 feet from any side lot line except for a common drive approved by the adjoining property owners and [he City. Public purpose served by this requirement is [o reduce visual pollution in areas adjacent to 1ot lines and to separate adjacent parking areas with landscaped areas. APPEALS CO2�AIISSION MEETING JUNE 26 1984 PAGE Z B. STATED HARDSHIP: "Cannot drive a truck through without a variance." C. ADMiNISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: This is the second building on the west side of Rancher's Road, south of 81st Avenue. The first building was built with an approved plan indicating a separ- ate driveway off Rancher's Road. The driveway was to be 25 feet wide, with a 5 foot separa[ion between it and the building, and another 5 . foot separation between it and the south property line. This method would have allowed this building (the latj to be independent of joint driveway usage and Leave a 5 foot green space along its south property Line for snow storage and landscaping. The approved plan for the secoad building (the one now under construction), located adjacent [o and south of the lst building, is to do the same thing; a 25 foot drive located 5 feet off the north side of [he building and 5 feet south of the north line, thus allowing for a 10 foot planting strip between the two driveways. The petitioner now has petitioned the City to combine the two separate drives into one 60 foot drive between the structures, narrowing down to one 32 foot driveway opening onto Rancher's Road. The staff feels that the 10 foot green space should be provided for, at least between the buildings, to allow for proper snow s[orage and to separate the two projects with a definite green space especially if and when the pzoperties are sold to different owners. If, however, the Board recommends approval of this request, it should be stipulated that the proper easements be executed to accomplish the jaint use of the driveway facility, I�fr . CLark submitted the original plan for construction of the first building which shows a five foot green area. He stated the petitioner now wants a conanon driveway between this first building and the second building now under construction. Mr. Clark stated staff would recocamend a 10 foot green area be provided between the two structures. Mr. Paschke stated in LS years he has not heen required to do something Like this as it is strictly a drainage and driving easement between the property owners. He felt there could be a joint driveway as long as it is properly recorded with the County. P]r, paschke stated he didn't feel it would be possible to � ow anything on the 10 foot planting strip because of the snow. APPEALS COI�AIISSION MEETING. JUNE 26, 1984 PAGE 3 Mr. C1ark stated the door located on the first building was not on the original plan and it was staff's opinion that some of the hardship was created by placing the door on [his building. Mr, paschke stated he builds for the buyer and not himself and if they want a door, they wi11 provide one wherever they want it. 1+�TION BY' MR. PLEMEL, SECONDED SY MR. BARNA, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON CABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:47 P. M. Mr, Barna stated in taking the whole area into considezation, he can't point out where there is green area between buildings. Mr. CLark stated there is one, but the space between the buildings is a lot more. Also, these are others that are probably in existance if given time to research. Ms, Gabe1 stated she didn't like to give up the green area, but this barrier might cause more trouble for [he truck traffic than it is wor[h. She also felt it would be difficult to maintain this area. Mr. PLemel stated he can understand the City planners would like to have as much green area as possible, but couldn't see where [his 10 feet would greatly add to the landscaping. MOTION BY MR. PLEMEL, SECONDED BY MEt. BARNA TO RECOMME��D APPROVAL OF THE VARLSNCE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO ELIPIINATE THE REQUIREMENT FOR A 5 FOOT SETBACK FROM THE PROPERTY LINE FOR A PARKING OR HARD SURFACE AREA, TO ALLOW ROOM FOR TRUCK TRAFFIC, ON LOTS 2 AND 3, BLOCK 4, UNIVERSITY INDUSTRIAL PARK, THE SAME SEING 801� AND 8050 RANCHER'S ROAD, WITA THE STIPULATION THAT TNE PROPER EASEMENTS BE ERECUTED TO ACCOMPI,ISH THE JOINT USE OF THE ORIVEWAY FACILITY, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHA IIiPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY, Ms. Gabel stated this item would go to the City Council on August 6, 1984. 2. NORTH 25 FEET OF LOT 25. ALL OF LOT 26. AND THE SOUTH 7 FEET OF LOT 27_ st by Gary Geretschlaeger, 4757 2-1/2 Street N. E., Fridley, MN 55421), MOTION BY.I•S, GEROU, SECONDED BY MR. BARNA, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:55 P. M. Chairperson Gabel read the Administrative Staff Report: APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 26, 1984 PAGE 4 ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 4757 - 2-1/2 Street N. E. A, PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.07.3D.2b, requires a side yard adjoining an attached garage to be not less than 5 feet wide. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide space between individual structures to reduce conflagration of fire; to provide access to the rear yard for emergencies; and to Limit the condition of crowding in a residential neighborhood. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "Need garage that is 21 feet wide to gain entry into garage through a 9' x 7' overhead door. Rear entry s[eps would create entry problems if garage were smaller." C. ADNIINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: The house to the south of the petitioners is 22 feet from the pro- perty Line. This garage, if approved, would be 25 feet from the neigh6or's house. Therefore if [he Board approves this request, staff has no stipulations to recommend. t�. Barna asked [he petitioner, Mr. Geretschlaeger, why he wished to have a Larger garage. Mr. Geretschlaeger stated he needed this garage to house his vehicles as he carries tools in one of the vehicles and wants to be able to keep it locked in the garage. Mr. Geretschlaeger stated he needed the additional floor area in order to angle the vehicles in[o the garage in such a manner that it would permit him to get bo[h vehicles in and out, when needed. Ph. Geretschlaeger explained the design of the roof and stated he would like to begin construction as soon as possible. Ms. Gabel asked Mr. Geretschlaeger if he had talked to his neighbors about this p1an. Mr. Geretschlaeger stated several neighbors were at the meeting earlier and he explained his plan to them and they had no problems with it. Mr. Barna stated the hardship, as he sees it, is Mr. Geretschlaeger needs storage space for his two vehnicles, especially for the one which houses his tools and must be stored inside. MCYfION BY M5. GEROU, SECONDED BY MR. PLEMEL, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON Gl+BEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:05 P. M. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETIN6 JUNE 26 1984 PA(� 5 Mr. Plemel stated the new garage will be no closer to the property line so he would be in favnr of the variance. Mr. Barna stated there is sufficient room between the new garage and the exising house to the south. Ms. Gabel felt the plan was well-drawn and the hardship defined. She stated she didn't feel the neighborhood would be impacted in any negative way. MOTION BY MS. GEROU, SECONDED BY iflt. BARNA, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE REQUEST PURSUANT TO CHAPfER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 5 FEET TO 3 FEET TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ATTACHED 21 x 36 FOOT GARAGE TO BE LOCATED ON THE NORTA 25 FEET OF LOT 25, ALL OF LOT 26, AND THE SOUTH 7 FEET OF LOT 27, BLOCK 7, PLYMOUTH ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 4757 2-1/2 STREET N. E. THE EXISTING DETACHED C�1RAC� WILL BE REMOVED, UPON A VOICE VOTE, A�.L VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECIARED THE M(YfION CARRIED UNANINqUSLY. Ms, Gabel told t�fr. Geretschlaeger he wwld be able to obtain his building permit. 3. REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, st by K. G. Ingram, P. 0. Box 1242, Minneapolis MN 55440). MOTION BY MS. 6EROU, SECONDED BY MR. BARNA, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:08 P. M. Chairperson Gabe1 read the Administrative Staff Report: ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 7600 University Avenue N. E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.14.SD.Sa, requires a11 parking and hard surface areas to be no closer than 20 feet to any street right of way, Public purpose served by this requirement is to limit visual encroach- ment into neighboring sight Lines and to allow for aesthetically pleasing open areas adjacent to public right of ways. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "Fuel truck will be blocking the gasoline pump islands if we can`t widen the drive." APPEALS COt�4ffSSI6N MEETING JUNE 26 1984 PAGE 6 C. AD[�IINISZRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: If the Board recommends approval on this request, the staff would suggest that the petitioner submit a landscapfng plan indicating the type and location of all ground cover; emphasis sh wld be given towards perimeter screening. I�fr. Clark stated the Kayo Oil Company (Western Stores) is requesting a 10 fnot green strip setback along University Avenue instead of 20 feet. He stated, �❑ conjunction with this variance, Kayo would add green area which is now blacktopped and install landscaping around the perimeter of the property. Mr. Clark submitted a drawing indicating where the new curbing would be placed and the pump istand for trucks. Ph. Ingram stated they have no diesel fuel at this location and wish to put in an island for this purpose, but need to widen the drive. Mr. Ingram stated Bachman's was drawing up a landscaping pLan to meet the City's requirements. I�ts. GabeL pointed out they would be losing about five parking spaces. I�k. Ingram stated they are never short of parking and would meet [he re- quirements of the code. M4TION BY MR. PLEMEL, SECONDED BY MR. BP.RNA, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHA IItPERSON GABEL DECL4RED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:16 P. M. MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY hS. GEROU, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE PURHUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED 20 FOOT SETSACK FOR (�iEEN AREA TO 10 FEET SO THE DRIVEWAY CAN BE WIDENED ON LOT 1, BLOCK 1, COMMERCE PARK ADDITION� THE SAME BEING 7600 UNIVERSITY AVINUE N, E„ WITH THE STIPUTATION THAT A LANDSCAPE PLAN BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY STAFF ANb THAT THE PETITIONER WORK WITH STAFF ON THE LANDSCAPING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEI �ECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms, Gabel stated this item would go to the City Council on August 6, 1984. 4. APPEALS CODAfISSION MEETING, NNE 26. 1984 PAGE 7 hpTION BY IS. GEROU� SECONDED BY Mt. BARNA, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:20 P. M. Chairperson Gabel read the Administrative Staff Report: ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 8131 Ruth Circle N. E. A, PUBLIC YURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENf: Section 205.04.6A.3, allows a deck to extend up to ten feet into a required rear yard. Public purpose served by this requirement is [o allow use of a required rear yard while still maintaining aestheticalLy pLeasing open areas around residential structures. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "Our specific hardship in designing our sun room deck is meeting Federal and State passive solar energy tax credit guidelines. The energy tax requirement is "the area of glazing shall exceed the lesser of 15% of the floor area of the room in which the glazing is installed or $% of the floor area of [he habitable rooms within the dwelling uait". Our desire for a sun room deck with a dimension of 15' x 12' totals 180 square feet of floor space, making our require- ment of glazing surEace a minimum that must exceed 21 square feet. Our proposed plan is to obtain at least 20% of glazing (36 sq. ft.) which will make our passive solar system more effective. Obtaining the solar energy tax credit is a necessity in helping us reduce our cost in constructing our sun room deck. The addition of this room wi11 also give our family a second emer- gency exit in case of a fire. C. �+DNIINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: To the rear of this property is a City park. Some of the park activities include the use of flying objects such as balls and pucks. Whi1e the City's Park Director doesn't see the sun porch as a visual problem, he does see it as a vuinerable hazard for various park activities. Therefore, if the Board approves this request, it should be stipulated that the City wi11 not be responsible for any damage that may occur due to park activities. This stipulation should be part of an agree- ment that shall be recorded at the County Recorder's office. APPEALS COTIDLiSSION MEETING .NNE 26 1984 PAGE 8 Mr. Clark presented an aerial photo of the property and pointed out the location of the home in relation io the park. 2�. Clark stated it was felt because of the encroachment in[o the r•equired i�ear yard, the City shouldn't be responsible if any damage should occur to the Blomker's property due to park activities, t4r. BLomker stated, in order to obtain credi[ for solar energy, certain requirements a¢ist be met and they wish to construc[ the sunroom to meet this criteria. Mrs. BLomker stated there is no other entrance or exit to their home except thro�gh the front door and with the addi[ion of this room, i[ wi11 give tneir family a second emergency exit. I�fr . Barna questioned why the variance was for a deck ra[her than additional living space. Mr. Clark stated the variance shouLd be for additional living space. Ms. Gabel asked Mr, and I�s. Blomker if their neighbors were aware of this addition and if they were told it would be a deck or a sunroom. Mrs. Blomker stated their adjacent property owners are aware they are going [o build and know it will be a sunroom. Ms. Gabel stated she didn't have any problems with the sunroom, but if the public hearing notice indicated a deck was going to be constructed, she questioned if this would he a problem. 2�k. Clark stated it might be well to continue the public hearing or obtain statements from the neigh6ors indicating they are aware the Blomker's are constructing a sunroom. M(ITION BY iIIt. BARNA, SECONDED BY MS. GEROU, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:35 P. M. Ms. Gabel questioned the concept of solar energy devices in relation to variances. Mr. CLark stated solar energy devices would constitute a hardship in obtaining variances to City setbacks. Mr. Barna stated his main concern is they are talking abou[ two different things, a deck and a sunroom. He felt if the variance was approved, the petitioner should bring notorized Letters from the adjoining property owners indicating they are aware of the sunroom addition and have no objection, before issuance of a building permit. Ms. Gabel, Ms. Gerou, and Mr, Plemel didn`t feel it was necessary to have the letters from the adjoining property owners notorized, but that they should be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. APPEALS COMMZSSION MEETING JUNE 26 1984 PAGE 9 MOTIpN gy MR, BARNA, SECOAIIIED BY M[t. PLEMEL, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF TfiE VARIANGE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CZTY CODE, TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 25 FEET TO 13 F'EET TO ALL441 THE CONSIRUCTION OF A 12 FOOT x 15 FOOT DECK-SUNROOM �N LOT 7, BLOCK 5, BOURDEAUX`S SPRING BROOK PARK AD4ITION, THE SAME BEING 8131 RUTH CIRCLE N. E., WITH THE STIPULATION THAT A LETTER BE SUBMITTED FItOM EAQi OF THE ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS iNDICATING THEY ARE AWARE THIS IS A SUNROOM AND NOT AN OPEN DECK AND, FURTHER, AN AQtEEMENT BY THE PETITIONEft IS TO BE RECORDED AT THE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE INDICATING THE CITY WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE Tk1AT MAY OCCUR DUE TO PARK ACTIVITZES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Gabel stated a huilding permit could be issued upon receip[ of these letters from the adjoining property owners. ADJOURNMENT : MOTION BY Mft, BARNA, SECOAIDED BY iS, GEROU, TO ADTOURN THE MEETING. UPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VaLING AYE, CHt1IRPER50N GABEL DECLARED THE NNE Zb, 1984, APPEALS CO24IISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:45 P. M. Respectfully submit[ed, ,i%,� / /�, , �� ,,, ,C.i'i,.L ��,�.y; � � Carole Haddad Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEY HOUSING fi REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY t�ETIIVG June 27, 1984 CALL TO ORDER• Chairperson Commers called the June 27, 1984, Housing 6 Redevelopment Au[hority meeting to order at 7:00 p. m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Larry Commeres, Duane, Prairie, Elmars Prieditis, Wal[er Itasmussen Members Absent: Carolyn Svendsen Others Present: Nasim Qureshi, NRA Director Sid Inman, Cicy Finance Director Dave Newman, City Attozney ApPROVAL OF MP.Y 19 1984 HOUSING 6 REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINVfES: MOTION BY Mt. PRAIRIE, SECONDED BY Mft. RASMUSSEN, TO APPROVE THE MAY 10, 1984 NOUSING 6 REDEVELOPMENT AU'i'HORITY MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOT II1G AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADOPTION OF AGENDA; The following items were considered under "O[her Business": paschke Construction TIP Ik2 Humphrey Dome Appreciation Night Public 1.'orks Memo 108-84 Re; Landscape Plan for Skywood Mall Motel Report fzom City Attorney Re: Steven Hardel Property The agenda was adopted with the addition of the above i[ems. 1. STATUS OF HOLLY CENTER; Ph. Qureshi stated Holly Shopping Center vas bought by the Hearthland organization and they vish to update it and make a more aggressive local shopping cen[er. He stated the wners are interested in the Federal 312 subsidized interest program and their application is being processed through the County. He etated i£ the funding is received, they wuld match this amount for upgrading Aolly Center. HOUSING � REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING Jf7NE 27 1984 PAGE 2 t�i. Qureshi stated the owners are also interested in purchasing the old Phillips 66 gas station. He sta[ed they have approached the owner and are in the process of obtaining appraisals and, once these are obtained, their proposal K11L probably come back before the HRA. ?tr, Prairie questioned if 312 funds vere aot received, what wou2d happen. 1�. Qureshi stated there would probably be a further review of the pot- entials and what the risks would be, however, the new owners wish to attract more business. He staced all indications are showing tha[ the neu Country BuEfe[ restaurant in Holly Center is doing a fairLy good business since they have opened. Pk. Commers stated theze were some appraisals done on this gas station several years ago and thought perhaps this information may be useful. 2, HARDWARE BUILDING USAGE: Mr. Qureshi stated the new owners of Hotly Center have indica[ed ihat Snyder Drugs may be interested in expanding their score and unless they are given more space, they may not renew their Iease. t�. Qureshi stated [he Ci[y cvrrently has a lease with Holly Center for [he liquor store. 8e stated the sales approach for liquor stores has changed and a number of warehnuse type stores are opening. t4. Qureshi stated this type of operation has been discussed with the City Council and [he proposal is to lease about 8,500 square feet in the hardware building. He stated the lease would probably be for three years, with a guarantee of two years, and the Last year would be optional. Ph�. Qureshi sta[ed it is estimated ihe City would have to put aLmost $60,000 into [his operation and would lease space at $2.50 a square foot. He stated if [he HRA moved out the liquor s[ore in the third year, they would proportionately pay for the improvements which would probably amount to about $20,000, since some of the items included in the.$60,000 figure could be sold. Mr. Qureshi stated if the HRA gives conceptual approval, the relocation of the liquor store would possibly be in October. He stated, at this time, there is no guarantee Snyder's wants the additional space, but they have indicated an interest in expanding. I[ was the general concensus of the IiKA members that they would be interested in such an arrangement if the City desires to proceed. 3. PIANNING ApPROVAL FOR POLICE GARAGE: Mr. Qureshi presented the plans for coastruction of the Police garage and storage area,_outlining the loca[ion of the bridge, �alkway, driveways, and storage space. Mr. Qureshi stated the HRA called for bids for this construction which were opened on June 26. HOUSING b REDEVELOPMENT A[JTHORITY ?EETING JUNE 27 1984 PA� 3 ►'�. Qureshi stated the esti.mated costs, as indicated in Public Works Memo P117-8p fram John Flora, were as follovs: Preparation of Land $144,000 Cons[ruction of Retaining Wa11 170 000 Cons[ruct Storage Facility )5�000 Construct Walkway � I,andscaping 80�000 . He stated the total estimated cost was $469,000 and the Low bid received from Monette Construction vas $394,700. ?4'. Qureshi stated the costs vere broken down as follows: Prepara[ion of Land, $100,594; Cons[ruction of Retaining Wall, $146,691; Construction of Storage Facility, $71,960; and Construciion of Walkway & Landscaping, $75,455. Mr. Quereshi stated the tzaffic consultant proposed an island to allow only right turns on Mississippi Street, and to inczease the lanes from two to three on the South driveway to Sth Street, and these improvements were not included in the bid so there would be an additional cost of about 510,000 to make these improvements. He requested this work be added to the bid under Change Ozder No. 1 The HRA received the folloving bids the Cen[er City: Monet[e Construction Co. Witcher Construction Co. Acton Cons[ruc[ion Co. for the garage/storage facility in $394,700 397,500 4b4,86b MOTION BY M2, PRIEDITIS, SECONDED EY I�&t, RASMtJSSEN, TO INSTRUCT THE CITY COUNCIL TO ACCEPT THE g7D6.AND pWpgD � �pq�,�CT TO THE LOW BIDDER, MONETTE CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING CHANC� ORDER N0. 1. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTI�N GIRRIED UNANIMIUSLY, I�fi-. Qureshi s[ated it would simplify accounting procedures if the City Council could make payment to Monette Construction, however, both the HRA and Council xould review the payment and concur with it. He stated [he con[ra�tor would also receive paymen[ sooner since the Council mee[s more frequently than the HRA, Hr. Commers stated the Ci[y is in agreement [o share in the cost of the storage facility, I�tr, Qureshi sta[ed the City would be paying their portion of these costs, I�h. Qureshi s[a[ed the County has been considering widening Mississippi Stzeet all the vay to Sth Street and those costs would be brought before the HRA vhen a decision is made by the County. Mr. Qureshi stated the NSP power line will be relocated which involves substantial costs 8nd it may be easier for the City to pay this re- lxation cost, rather than the HRA, and then receive a credit from the HIL9 to be applied to the storage facility. �e ggp members indica[ed no objection to this suggestion since it vould be an even tzade-off. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING JUNE 27 1984 PAGE 4 Mr, Commers stated dirt is being hauled out in connection with the Target project and felt they would then have to bring some back for the parking lot. Mr, Qureshi stated Target is responsibLe for this operation so there would be no extra charge to the HRA for fill. He stated he is meeting with the Target repzesentatives regarding this question and if there is any change, he would notify the NRA. 4. FRiDLEY CINTER CITY PIAT: Mr. Cocmners stated the HRA tentatively approved proceeding with this plat for the Center City. M(YTION BY I�IIt, RASMUSSEN� SECONDED BY MR, PRAIRIE, TO CONCUR WITH THE LAYOUT AS YROPOSED IN THE CITY CENTER ADDITION PLAT. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANI2�%,'USLY. 5, APPROVAL OF 49ERS USE OF HRA PROPERTY: The HRA received the information regarding a carnival license in con- junction with the FYidley 49er's Celebration. 6. REQUEST FROM STORER CABLE TELEVISION FOR FINANCING ON CABLE RELOCATION: Mr. Commers stated a request was received from Storer CabLe Television for compensation from the HRA in the relocation of their cable lines in the redevelopment area of Mississippi Street and lJniversity Avenue. Mr. Commers stated staff has recommended deniai of this request as the franchise agreement between the City and Storer states that removal or replacement of service iines shall be at the expense of Storer. Mr. Qureshi stated NSP will be relocating underground some of their power lines anc the City's franchise agreement with NSP provides they will be reimbursed by the City for this relocation. The HRA received the memo from the Public Works Director, pW 100-84 regarding the request and s[aff's recommendation. 7. FINANC7AL STATEMENT: The HI2A received the financial s[atement presented by I�, Inman, Finance Director. There was a general discussion on bonding and whether the HItA should call for bonds at this point in time. Mr. Inman stated if the HRA has a fund balance at the completion of the Target project, it becomes speculative to bond without any other projects. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTNORITY MEETING NNE 27 1984 PAGE 5 Mr. Commers stated he would like a report on whether all funds have [o he used in the Center City project. Mr. Inman stated he has :a letter regarding this question which he would forward to the t1RA. MOTION BY MEt. RASMIJSSEN, SECdNDED BY MR, PRIEDITIS, TO ACCEPT THE FINANCIAL REPORT. UPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COif1�RS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANZMOUSLY. 8. CHECK REGISTER: MOTION BY MR, PAAIRIR, SECONDED BY MR, PRIEDITIS, TO APPROVE THE CHECK REGISTER DATED NNE &, 1984, IN THE AMOUNT OF $34,946.22 WITH THE ADDITION OF THE STATEMENT FROM 0'CONNOR & HANNAN DATED MAY 16, 1984 IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,500 AND THE STATEMENT FROM HERRICK & NEWMAN DATED NNE 14, 1984 IN THE AI�UNT OF $3,08.40, LESS THE 3 HOURS ERRONEOUSLY CHARGED TO THE HRA FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MDTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 9. OTHER BUSINESS: PASCHKE CONSTRUCTION IN TAX INGREMENT PROJECT 9�2: T�. Qureshi stated Mr. Paschke submitted cons[ruction plans for Lots 3, 5 and 6, Block 4, University Industrial Park in Tax Increment Project 9k2. He stated it would be in order for the HRA to accept and approve the plan. i�17TI0N BY Mt. RASMUSSEN, SECONDED BY M[t. PRIEDITIS, TO ACCEPT AND ApPROVE THE PIANS SU&MITTED BY MR. PASCHKE IN PUBLIC WORKS MEMD, PW 101-84. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECI.ARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANII�USLY, HUMPHREY DOME APPRECIATION NIGHT; Ph�, Commers stated the HRA members received information regarding this appreciation night at the Metrodome and anyone interested in attending should notify Mr. Qureshi. LANDSCAPE PIAN FOR SKYWOOD MALL MOTEL - PUBLIC WORKS MEMO LOS-84: 2�. Qureshi stated this memo is submitted for the HI2A's information. Ae stated the developer is meeting with the neighbors regarding the Landscaping behind the motel. The HRA received Public Works Memo 108-84 for informational purposes. � �, : � HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, JUNE 27, 1984 PA(� 6 1 REPORT FROM CITY ATTORNEY RE: STEVEN HARDEL PROPERTY: I Mr. Commers asked if more can be offered for property or if they must go with the value placed on it by the appraisers. Mr. Newman stated there has been some funding restrictions, but one of the things always taken into consideration is the cost o£ litigation. Mr. Qureshi stated it wo�ld tiave to be determined what would be a reasonable settlement in comparison to what it may cost to go to trial. MOTION BY P'Ht, RASMUSSEN, SECONDED BY M[t. PRAIRTE, TO AUTHORIZE UP TO $95,006 FOR SETTLEMENT OF THIS PROPERTY, IF IT IS LEG4LLY ACCEPTABLE, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTTNG AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIM�USLY. ADJOURNI�NT: MOTION BY MR. RASMl1SSEN, SECONDED BY MR, PRAIRIE, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE JUNE 27, 1984, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHOI2ITY MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:15 P. M. Respectfully submitted, `�� iQ7y"�-fi� Carole Haddad Recording Secretary f � � � `i /': � CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COh1MISSION MEETIPJG, JULY 1$, 1984 CALL TO ORDER: Chairwoman Schnabel called the July 18, 1984, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:33. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Ms. Schnabel, Mr. Oquist, Mr.Nielsen, Mr. Kondrick, Ms. Gabel, Mr. Minton, Mr, Saba Members Absent: None Others Present: Jim Robinson, Planning Specialist Don Hanson, 1482 Onondaga St. N.E, James I. Taylor, 1487 - 97th Ave., Coon Rapids Al1en Mattson, MCCK Properties, Inc. {See attached list) APPROVAL OF JUNE 20, 1984, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. ICONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. OQUI5T� TO APPROVE THE JUNE 20� 2984� PL7JNNING COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECL�iRED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. TABLED: LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #84-08, BY UON HANSON: Split off the Southerly 121� feet of Lot 28, Auditar's Subdivision No. 129, and Outlot A, Jim Lund Estates, to make a new building site at 1501 73 1/2 Avenue N.E. MOTION BY MX. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO REMOVE L.S. �84-08 FROM THE TAELE, � UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOU5LY. Mr. Robinson stated that as discussed at the last meeting, there are several large lots in this area that have the potential to 6e split also. For that reason, the Planning Commission decided to table any further discussion in order to inform the neighbors of this lot split request and of the possibility of other lot splits, with the potential of 73'2 Avenue going through, looping to Osborne at the east of the apartr�e�t building. He stated that this would be based on an agreement with the apartment build- %ng owner that the apartment building driveway become a city street. At this time, if just the petitioner, Mr. Hanson, splits his lot, Mr. Hanson will put in a driveway to the cul de sac on 732 Ave, However, the Gity will �ecure right-of-way for the splitting of any future lots. PLANNIN6 COMMI5S10N MEETING, JULY 18, 1984 PAGE 2 Ms. Schnabel stated this was not a plan the City had at this time. The Planning Comnission thought it logical to present this idea to the neighbors so that t6ose neighbors who do have large lots that might be affected and migfit want to consider splitting could understand how it could be worked out. It was notfiing that had to be done, a�d it was just in the talking stages at this time. They alse wanted to get the rest of the neighbors' reaction. Mr, Robinson stated that George Hanson, 1476 Onondaga St. N.E., Lot 26, was not able to attend this meeti�g. Mr, Hanson did say he would be in favor of the lot split, but he would like to make sure access was provided because he was irtterested in splitting his lot sometime in the future. Ms. Schnabel asked if there was anyone in the audience who would like to make sane cortments. Mr, James Vaughan, 1520 73; Ave. N.E., stated he lived on the southeast corner of the cul de sac. He stated that if 732 was extended, he would hate to lose the cul de sac. His question was: Who would pay the assess- ments for the street--would it be assessed to the new lots or would the existing homeowners on the existing 73; also have to pay the assessments? Mr, Robinson stated he believed the assessments would be paid by the lots that are split, but he would do some further checking to see if that was correct. Ms. Sue Sherek, 1530 732 Avenue N.E., stated that the east end of 732 also ends in a cul de sac, so there are cul de sacs on both ends. At the east end there is an apartment building, but the apartment was required to access onto 73rd Avenue. If there was the possibility of multiple dwellings going on any of the larger lots, would it be possible to have their access onto 73rd Ave. also? Ms. Schnabel stated that was a hard question to answer at this time, but the chances were that the City vro uld prefer to have the access go onto 73rd. Ms. Schnabel asked if there were any neighbors in the audience who were interested in splitting their lots. Hearing no other comments, Ms. Schnabel stated they would proceed to handle the lot split request that was submitted by the petitioner, Mr, Don Hanson. Mr. Robinson restated the stipulations recortmended by Staff: 1. Provide a 27 ft. street easement for possible future use. 2. Asphalt curb work on 73� Ave. to be done by City's contractor at owner's expense 3. Property owner to provide driveway to street 4. Driveway to be removed at no cost to the City in the event the street goes through 5, Signed park fee agreement of $750 6, Split to be registered at the County prior to issuance of a building permit, or before Oct, 15, 1984 PLANNIPlG COMMISSION MEETING JULY 18 1984 PAGE 3 7. Front yard setback of 44 ft. 8. Rear yard setback of 25 ft. 9. Payment of special assessments MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY l4R. MINTON� TO CLOSE TilE PUBLIC HEARING ON L,S. #84-08 BY DON HANSON. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCANABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CZASED AT 8:00 P.M. MOTION BY MR. OQUI5T� SfiCONDED BY MR. KONDRICK� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF IAT 5PLIT REQUEST� L.S, k84-OS BY DON XANSON, TO SPLIT OFF THE SOUTHERLY 12Zf FEET OF IAT 28� AUDSTOR'S 5UBDIVISION NO, I29, AND OUTLCYl A� JSl1 LUND ESTATES� TO MAKE R NEW BUILDING SITE AT I50I 73 I/2 AVENUE N.E.� WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: 1. PROVIDE A 27 F2. STREET EASEMENT FOR POSSIBLE FUTURE USE 2. ASPHRLT CURB WORK ON 73� AVENUE TO BE DONE HY CITY'S CONTRACTOR AT OWNER'S EXPENSE 3. PROPERTY OWNER TO PROVZDE DRIVEWRY TO SSREET 4. DRIVEWAY TO BE REMOVED AT NO COST TO THE CITY IN THE EVENT THE STREET GOES THROUGH 5. SIGNED PARK FEE AGREEMENT OF 5750 6. SPLIT TO BE REGISTERED AT THE COUNTY PRIOR 2'O ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT� OR BEFORE OC2'. 15� 1984 � 7. FRONT YARD SETBACK OF 44 FT. . 8. REAR YARD SETBACK OF 25 FT. 9. PAYMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHASRYJOMAIV SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated this item would go to City Council on August 6. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION Of A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #84-12, BY S I, TAVLOR: Per Section 205.14.1,C, 0., o€ the Fri ley City Co e, to allow a repair garage (Midas Muffler) on Lot 1, Block 1, University Industrial Park, the same being 8080 University Avenue N.E. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. MINTON� TO OPEN 2HE PUBLIC HERRING ON 5P #84-Z2 BY JAME5 I. TAYLOR. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:04 P,M, � Mr. Robinson stated this property was located on the southwest corner of 81st and University. The zoning was C-2, and it was surrounded by light and heavy industrial with some additional C-2. The site plan showed the building situated in the northern portion of the lot, It included 35 ft. setbacks all around the building. There will be 28 stalls, 22 outside and 6 inside. He stated the proposal meets all code requirements. PLANNING COhfi1I5SI0N MEETING, JULY 18 1984 PAGE 4 Mr. Robinson stated Staff would recomnend the following stipulations: 1, Approved landscape plan with irrigation system 2. No outside storage 3, Approved drainage plan Ms, Schnabel asked the petitioner if he had any comments he would like to make. Mr, James Taylor stated he was currently operating the Coon Rapids Midas Muffler store and has been there for 5 years, Prior to that, he worked for Midas International in Palatine, I11., totalling 12 years with the company. He stated business was good in Coon Rapids, and it was time to look forward. After looking around, they felt Fridley was the best area for expansion as it would be easy for him to control both stores. He stated he would like to build in Fridley, and if the special use permit is approved, he would like to open his business in the sumner of 1985. Ms, Schnabel asked about the hours of operation. Mr. Taylor stated they would be the normal retain hours: 8:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday with one late night; 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m, on Saturday, and closed on Sunday. Ms. Gabel asked if they would do any oil change work. Mr, Taylor stated they do very little. They do have a 250 gallon tank in the dumpster for used oil. When it is full, it is picked up and hauled away. MOTION BY MR, KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SP #84-22, BY JAME5 T. TAYSAR, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN 5CHNABEL DECLARED SXE pUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:15 P.M. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. SA&A, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCSL APPROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT� SP H84-12, BY .7AME5 I, TAYLOR� PER SECTION 205,24.I�C�4� OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE� TO ALLOW A REPAIR GARAGE (MIDAS MUFFLER} ON LpT 1, BIACK I, iP.77VER3ITY INDUSTRIAL PARK, SXE SAME BEING &080 TJNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E., WITH THE FOLLOWING 5SIPULATIONS: 1. APPROVED I,ANDSCAPE pLAN WITH IRRIGATION SYSTEM 2- APPROVED DRAINAGE PLAN 3. NO OUTSZDE STORAGE UPQN A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMI�7 SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOU5LY. Ms. Schnabel stated this item would go to City Council on August 6. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 1$ 1984 PAGE 5 3, PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SP #84-13. M rrcurtKiita, iiv�., �r wn �n�uinHKU: rer �ecLton zu5.u�.i, s, t, or tne ri ey ity o e, o a ow o s S and 79, Block A, River Heights, zoned R�1 (one family dwellingsj to be used for a parking lot and garage to be used in conjunction with a 7-unit multiple dwelling at 441 Hugo Street N.E. MOTION BY M8. GABEL� 5ECONDED BY MR. MINTON, SO OPEN THE PUBLIC NEARSNG ON SP #84-I3 BY MCCK PROP�RTIES� INC. UPON A VOICE VOPE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED SHE PUBLIC HERRING OPEN AT 8:20 P.M. Mr. Robinson stated the proposal is for a 7-unit townhouse on the northeast corner of Hugo St. and East River Road. The property is zoned R-3 on the west with a 50 ft, portion of R-1 on the east. He stated the structural part of the development wi11 be entirely on the R-3 property, The code states that a parking lot is allowed on R-1 property with a special use permit. Mr. Robinson stated the variances requested and approved by the Appeals Commission on July 10 were for the reduction of a planting strip from 15 ft. to 5 ft. in the R-3 portion and 10 ft, to 5 ft, in the R-1 portion. The Appeals Commission also approved a variance to reduce the front yard setback from 35 ft. to 25.6 ft. Mr. Robinson stated one of the big concerns expressed by the neighbors at the July lOth Appeals Gomnission meeting was that Nugo St, was only 26 ft. wide, and they were very concerned about parking on the street. It was suggested by the Appeals Comnission that parking be allowed only on the north side of the street. Mr. Robinson stated Staff would recommend the same stipulations as those for the variances: 1. The units be constructed of townhouse design 2, A drainage plan be approved by the City's Engineering Dept. 3. An approved landscaping plan 4. A 172 ft, easement along East River Road 5. A fire wall be constructed along the east wall of the garage Mr. Oquist stated another stipulation might be that there be continuity between the outside finish of the garages and the townhouses. Mr. Allen Mattson, a partner in MCCK Properties, Inc., stated they are planning to use 4-5 inch boards on the back of the garages so it will look like fencing. Whatever they do with the townhouses, they will incorporate the same outside finish with the garages. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 18, 1984 PAGE 6 Mr. Leonard Dailey, 8191 East River Road, stated he owned the 5-unit apartment complex on East River Road. He stated he was in favor of this proposal. His main concern was drainage, because the run-off goes to a low spot in the 6ack of his lot, He just wanted to make sure the drainage was handled adequately. Mr. Peter Rech, 8161 Ruth Circle, stated he traveled Hugo St. every day to East River Road. He stated Hugo St, is only 26 ft. wide and when there are two cars parked on both sides of the street, it is very tricky to pass another car. It was very difficult for school buses and emergency vehicles. He stated he wanted to again bring this concern to the Planning Commission's attention. MOSION BY MR. MINTON� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO CLOSE THE PUBLZC HEARING ON SP �84-13 BY MCCK PROPERTIES� INC. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOA1liN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HERRING CIASED AT 8:50 P.M. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR, SABA� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APpROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT� SP H84-Z3� MCCK PROPERTIES� INC.� BY DON CHOUINARD� pER SECTION 205.07.1� 3� E� OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE� TO ALLOW IATS 78 AND 79, BLOCK A� RIVER HEIGHTS� ZONED R-2 (ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS) TO BE USED FOR A PARKING IAT AND GARRGE TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A 7-UNIT MULTIPLE DWELLING AT 441 HUGO STREET N.E.� WITX THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: 2. THE UNITS BE CONSTRUCTED OF TOWNHOUSE DE52GN 2, A DRAINAGE PLAN BE APpROVED BY THE CISY'5 ENGINEERING DEPT. 3. AN AppROVED LJINDSCAPING PLAN 4. A 27'q FT, EASEMENT AZANG EAST RIVER ROAD 5, A FSRE WALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE EAS2 WALL OF THE GARAGE 6. THE EXTERIOR OF THE EAST GARAGE WALL BE OF THE SRME MATERIAL AS THE TOWNHOUSES 7. THERE BE A TOWNHOUSE COVENANT UPON A VOICE [�OTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION BY MS, GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK� TO CONCUR WZTH THE ApPEALS COMMIS5ION'S RECOMMENDATION THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER A°NO PARKING" REQUIRE'MENT ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF TNE 400 BLOCK OF HUGO ST, ZN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE PARKING. Ms. Gabel stated her only concern was that maybe a"no parking" requirement on just the 400 block was too limiting. The City should probably consider more tF�an just the 400 block of Hugo. Ms, Schnabel agreed that perhaps more than the 400 block of Hugo should be looked at by the City as far as "no parking" on one side of the street, and perhaps other streets in that area that have similar problems. The reason for the Planning Commission's concern was for emergency vehicles, such as NG COMMISSION MEETING. JULY 18, 1984 fire trucks, plus the reigh6ors have pointed out that school buses also have a problem traveling the streets when there is parking on both sides. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated both the special use permit and the variances would go to Gity Council on August 6. 4. RECEIVE JUNE 7, 1984; HUMAN RE50URCES COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. MINTON, SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST� TO RECEIVE TXE JUNE 7� I984, Hi7MAN RESOURCES COMMISSIDN MINUTE5. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CAAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. RECEIVE JUNE 18, 1984, PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. MINTON, 21� RECEIVE THE JUNE I8� 1984, PRRKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES. i7PON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. RECEIVE JUNE 19, 1954, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COh7�tIS5I0N MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. NIELSEN� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK� TO RECEIVE THE JUNE 29, 1984� ENVIRONMENTAL gUALIPY COMMISSION MZNUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECT�IRED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 7, RECEIVE JUNE 26, 1984, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS, GABEL� 5ECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO RECEIVE THE JUNE 26� 1984, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHASRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 8. RECEIVE JULY 10, 1984, APPEALS COMMISSION F�INUTES: MOTIDN BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY MR, KONDRICK, 20 RECEIVE THL' JULY 10, 1984, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON R VOICE POTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE A10TION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PLANNIN6 COMMISSION MEETING. JULY 18. 1 9. RECEIVE JUNE 27, 1984, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: PAGE 8 MOSION BY MR. OQUI5T� SECONDED BY MR. MINTON� TO RECEIVE THE JUNE 27� 1984� HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORZTY MINUTES. UPON A i/OICE VOTE� ALL VG'lIIJG AYE, CHAIRWOA?AN SCHNRBEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 10. OTHER BUSINESS: a. Public Hearings on Lot Splits Ms. Schnabel stated that at the last meeting, the Planning Comnission members had briefly discussed public hearings on lot splits. She had asked Staff to prepare some kind of proposal for a change in the ordinance to be presented to the Commission at this meeting. Mr. Robinson stated he had first talked to Dave Newman, City Attorney, and Mr. Newman agreed that if the Planning Commission is going to have informal public hearings on lot splits, they should have them across tF�e board for all lot sp]its. Mr. Robinson stated he then went to the Staff to see if they wanted to pass an ordinance to revise the code. He stated it was Staff's recomnenda- tion that the informal public hearings be handled as a matter of policy and not a change in the law. Mr. Robinson stated this policy change has been approved by Staff, so whenever there is a lot split request, Staff will automatically send out notices for an informal public hearing. The Planning Commission members were very much in agreement with this policy change. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. MINTON, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK� TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A S�OICE VOTE� ALL [�OTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL-DfiCLARED THE JULY I8� Z984� PLANNING COMMISSION h1EETING ADJOURNED AT 9:45 P,M. Respectfully submitted, y eSaa Recording Secretary \ ��G�� C v �y�-�`2d".-� � �„r1�� , . �. / i�, ��d y f--� ��, �' r�,�-. �� = � �-, 1 � yc�� ruc,� 5\\chnai� � �'t��s�Y, /''1 �� l�I r s L, � a�� //�� ll��.S � �4�OC�,O/Y(� �J i�wtES V iQ�1 � fd A�i �ry/ /�i�vlr�c�s ��°J'r � �. � ''��G�.i �� L�.Yo� I..AYSJ.� � �c,�e, �%7e.r�� a ��-�-.�- /�ig7 9��vz . �.�. � 2 45� wa��ATP �urb. , M ��N�ra�i� 5�3¢3 t y 8z- C�.,�o�,�a S�_ 4�.€ &�s� E !t; uP� �Cc�. �s/� �� / Cr�� /�� 5a� �� f�dc� � 73ss� ,�,�y,�s � 3�3 N��s sf Nc- 8/�� fZ��(� L',�JE 9U,�, 15� 3�3'iz �} wz N L ��o -73 z A�� I� � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 18 1484 PAGE 2 Ms. Schnabel stated this was not a plan the City had at this time. The Planning Cortmission thou9ht it logical to present this idea to the neighbors so that those neighbors who do have large lots that might be affected and might want to consider spliiting could understarid how it could be worked out. It �as notfiing that had to be done, and it was just in the talking stages at this time. They alsa wanted to get the rest of the neighbors' reaction. Mr. Robinson stated that 6eorge Hanson, 1476 Onondaga 5t. N.E., Lot 26, was not able to attend this meeting. Mr, Hanson did say he would be in favor of the lot split, but he would like to make sure access was provided because he was interested in splitting his lot sometime in the future. Ms. Schnabel asked if there was anyone in the audience who would like to make some comments. Mr, James Vaughan, 1520 73z Ave. N.E „ stated he lived on the southeast corner of the cul de sac. He stated that if 73i was extended, he would hate to lose the cul de sac. His question was: Who would pay the assess- ments for the street--would it be assessed to the new 7ots or would the existing homeowners on the existing 732 also have to pay the assessments? Mr. Robinson stated he believed the assessments would be paid by the lots that are split, but he would do some further checking to see if that was correct. Ms. Sue Sherek, 1530 73%z Avenue N,E., stated that the east end of 732 also ends in a cul de sac, so there are cul de sacs on both ends. At the east end there is an apartment building, but the apartment was required to access onto 73rd Avenue. If there was the possibility of multiple dwellings going on any of the larger lots, would it be possible to have their access onto 73rd Ave. also? Ms. Schnabel stated that was a hard question to answer at this time, but the chances were that the City would prefer to have the access go onto 73rd. Ms. Schnabel asked if there were any neighbors in the audience who were interested in splitting their lots, Hearing no other comments, Ms. Schnabel s*ated they would proceed to handle the lot split request that was submitted by the petitioner, Mr. �on Hanson. Mr. Robinson restated the stipulations recommended by Staff: 1. Provide a 27 ft. street easement for possible r"uture use. 2. Asphalt curb work on 732 Ave, to be done by City's contractor 3, 4. 5. 6. at owner's expense Property owner to provide driveway to street Driveway to be removed at no cost to the City street goes through Signed park fiee agreement of $750 Split to be registered at the County prior to building permit, or before Oct. 15, 1984 in the event the issuance of a R 1 1 � ' i� i j 1, I I } ; CITY OF FRTDLEY APPEAIS COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 10, 1984 CAII TO 4RDER: Chairperson Gabel called the Ju1y 10, 1984, Appeals Commission meeting to order at 7:33 p,m, ROII CALL: Members Present: Pat Gabe1, Alex Barna, Jim Plemel, Jean Gerou, Donald Betzold Members Absent: None Others Present: Darre7 C1ark, City of Fridley Mr. & Mrs. Leonard Dailey, 8191 East River Road Mr. & Mrs. Marv Schmidtz, 1616 Rice Creek Road Mr. Peter Rech, 8161 Ruth Circle N.E. Mr, Guy R, Lundsten, 389 Hugo St. N.E. Mr, & Mrs. 6ary Claggett, 440 Hugo St. N,E. Mr. & Mrs, Frar�k Hegner, 450 Hugo St. N.E. Ms. Viola Zuelke, 8161 East River Road Ms. Camilla 5chultz, 371 Huga St. N.E. Mr, Mitchetl Cook, 420 Hu90 St, N.E, APPROVAI OF JUNE 26. 1984. APPEALS COMdISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY PfR. B,ARl1A, SECCNDED BY MS, GEROU� TO APPROVE THE JUNE 26, 1984, APPEAIS CpMMISSION MINUl'ES AS WRITTEN, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAZRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE IdOTION CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY. 1. REOUEST FOR A TO CNAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COdE TO „ ri ey, n. 55432) n , iaio K1CQ MOTION BY M9, GElZOi), SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARZNG. i1PON A VOICE VOTE, ALL YOTZNG AYE, CHAIRPER50N GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARZNG OPEN AT 7;34 P,M. Chairperson Gabel read the Administrative Staff Report: ADMINISTRA7IVE STAFf REPORT 1616 Rice Creek Road N.E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQlJIREMENT: Sectian 205.07,3A,2a requires a side yard af 10 feet between any living area and side property lines. APPEALS C0t1MI5SI4N MEETING, JULY 10, 7984 PAGE 2 Public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a minimum of 20 feet between living areas in adjacent structures and 15 feet between garages and living areas in adjacent structures to reduce exposure to conflagration of fire. It is also to allow for aesthetically pleasing open areas around residential structures. B. STATED HARDSHIP; "Want to add fireplace and 2 feet onto dining room for entertaining," C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: The neighbors to the east, 1620 Rice Creek Road, have their garage next to the common lot line and their garage is b feet from the 1ine. There is 16.6 feet between the garage at 1620 Rice Creek Road and the existing hause at 161b Rice Creek Road, If the variance is approved, the distance between the garage and the addition would be 74.fi feet. Therefore, if the 8oard approves this request, the staff has no stipulations to recommend. Mr, Clark showed the Commission members a picture of the property, a floor plan of the proposed addition, and an aerial photo of the house as it related to the other houses on the b7ock. He stated tfie petitioner's house sits forward of the neighbor's garage so there is only a small portion where the two structures are the 14,6 ft. apart. Ms. Gabel asked the petitioner, Mr. Marvin Schmidtz, to explain his proposal. Mr. Schmidtz stated one of the reasons for the addition was for cosmetic reasons. The house presently has a straight gabled roof. The 2-foot addition will bring out the pitch of the roof in the opposite direction, and he felt the addition of the firepiace wili make the house better looking from the outside. Mr. Schmidtz stated the other reason for the addition was to enlarge the dining room area. They presentty have a small 9' x 10' dining room. It is difficuit to entertain very many adults in it. He stated he owns an engineer- ing firm sa he does have clients over and does quite a bit of entertaining. So, to make the dining room more functional, they would iike to increase it to 11' x 13'. Mr, Schmidtz stated the Commission members had received a copy of a letter from his neighbors, Arnoid and Barbara Hahn, 1b2d Rice Creek Road, stating they were �n favor of this remode7ing and they felt it would enhance the appearance of the home as well as the neighborhood. Mr. Clark stated that for the Appea7s Com-�ission members' information, the fireplace was an allowable encroachment into the sideyard, so the extension ` the walt for the dining room was what was necessary for approval in order �dd it on. a. F . APPEALS COhtMISSIdN MEETING. JULY 10, }984 PAGE 3 Mr. Barna asked what Mr. Schmidtz planned to do with the wall adjacent to the neighbor's garage. Would there by any windows? Mr. 5chmidtz stated there would be no windows on the garage side, but he would probably have three 6 ft, windows on the side facing their back yard. Ms. Gerou asked if there was a step up into the dining room from the living room. Mr, Schmidtz stated there was so there was no way the dining room table could be extended into the living room, MOTION BY MR. BARYA, SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD� TD RECEIVE THE LETTER DATED JULY 3, 2984, FR01�1 ARNOLD 6 BETTY HAHN, 2620 RICE CREEK ROAD N.E. UPON A VDZCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON C,ABEL DECT1iRED 2HE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, MOTION BY MS. GEROU� SECONDED BY MR, BARNR� TO CLQSE TNE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VDICE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE, CHRIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:43 P.M, Mr. Barna stated that in ]ooking at the aerial phato and in driving around the neighborhood,he found that quite a few houses in that area are situated differently on the lots. He stated it was hard to visuatize the additional 2 ft. by driving by, but it did nai seem to him that visually the 2 ft, was going to add that much. As Mr, Schmidtz had stated, the change in the roof line will probably improve the look of the house. Ms. Gerou stated she cauld understand the hardship of a small dining room, especially with the step where they cannot extend into another area of the house. She would be in favor of granting the variance. Mr, Betzold stated he thought the distance between the buildings was going to be maintained. The code tries to strive for the 15 ft, difference, and here there was going to be 14.6 ft, which he believed was in the spirit of the code. It did not seem forseeabte that the neighbors would be requesting a variance to extend their garage since they already have a two-car garage, so there did not look like there woutd be any further encroachment in the future into this space. He saw no difficulty in granting this variance. Mr, Plemel stated that since there was no neighborhood objection, he would be in favor of granting the variance. MOTION BY MR. PLEMEL, SECONDED BY MR. HRRNA, TO APPROVE REQUEST FOk A VARIANCE � PURSU.4NT TO CHAPTER 205 p£ THE FRIDLEY CZTY CODE TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD FROId 20 FEET TO 8 FEET RCJ ALZ,OF7 THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2 x 2B FOOT ADDIT70N ON I,C)T Z� 3LOCK 1� BRIARDAI,E ADDZTION, THE SAME BESNG I626 RZCE CREEK ROAD N.E, UPON R VpZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTZON CRRRSED UNANIMOUSLY, APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING. JULY 10, 1984 PAGE 4 2. MOTZON BY MS. GEROU� SECONDED BY Mft. BARNA, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A vOZCE VOTE� ALL VOT`ZNG AYE, CNRIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED TNE PUBLIC HEARING RPEN AT 7:4$ P.M. Chairperson Gabe1 read the Administrative Staff Report: ADMINISTRATIUE 57AFF REPQRT 441 Hu90 Street N.E. A. PUf3LIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: E„ Section 205,04.J.D6, requires a minimum fifteen foot wide screening strip to provide for a physical separation between multiple dwelling district and any other residential district. Pub]ic purpose served by this requirement is to provide open areas adjacent to lot lines and to separate parking with landscaped areas. Section 205.Q9,3D.1 requires a front yard setback of not less than 35 feet for all structures. Public purpose served by this requirement is to allow for off-street parking without encroaching on the public right of way and also for aesthetic cansideration to reduce the buiiding "7ine of sight" encroach- ment into the neighbor's front yard, B, STATED HARDSHIP: "Hardship is because of linear shape of lots; parking must be on one side hecause of this." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFf REVIEW: This project consists of a seven-unit townhouse on land zoned R-3, and adjoining parking on land zoned R-3 (approximately 20 feet) and 7and zoned R-1 (approximately 50 feet). In conjunction with this application, a specia7 use permit has been applied for to ptace parking for the town- hauses on the fifty-foot R-1 portion of the site. , APPEALS COhC�1ISSI0N MEETING JULY 10, 1984 PAGE 5 Between the westerly portion of the parking lot zoned R-3 and adjacent R-2 zone, a fifteen foot buffer is required; five feet is provided. Between the easterly portion of the parking lot zoned R-1 and the adja- cent R-1 zone, a ten foot buffer is required, as per special use permit requirements; five feet is provided. An additional variance in the placement of a 9arage which encroaches 9.4 feet into the required front yard. Mr. Clark stated the Commission has had other variance requests on this same property. The most recent request was in 1979 for an extension of a 1978 variance very similar to tfiis variance. Since more than a year has past since the last extension, it became null and void, There is now a different petitioner with a different plan, but the same property. Mr. Clark stated the propertyis located in the northeast quadrant of East River Road and Hugo St. All but the easterly 50 ft. is zoned R-3. That is where the 7-unit multiple dwelling and a small amount of parking will go. The two 25 ft. lots adjacent and east are going to be considered for a special use permit for the garage to be used with the multiple dwelling. The property to the east on Hugo is single far,iily dwellings. The property to the north on Ironton has a multiple dwelling and adjacent to that is a four-unit building which would lie directly north of this proposed dwelling. While the properties are zoned R-2, they are being used as R-3 properties because when they were constructed, they were allowed to build R-3 complexes in R-2 zoning with different densities. Mr. Clark stated the approval of the variances in 1975 was for a 10-unit building, so this proposal is for a substantially smaller building as far as the number of units. It is proposed to be'built in a townhouse design. The petitioner at some time may plat this into townhouses. Mr. Clark stated that if the Carnnission approves this request, he would recorrrtnend the following stipulations: 1. A drainage plan be submitted to the Engineering Dept. 2. A landscaping plan be submitted for review. 3. In 1978 and 1479 the petitioner was asked to qrant a 17', ft, easement along East River Road for possible widening. Ms. Gabel asked the petitioner, Mr. Chouinard, to explain his proposal. Mr. Chouinard stated the proposal was to put a 7-unit building on the lot. To make everything fit, they have to put some garages closer to the lot line than what the code allows. They are asking for a reduction of the green areas from 15 ft, to 5 ft, on the side yard on the property zoned R-3 and from 10 ft. to 5 ft. on the rear and side yards on the R-1 portion. Ms. Gabel asked if the petitioner planned to sell the units or rent them. Mr. Chouinard stated it would depend on the economics. They would like to build with the possibility of selling the units in the future, At first, these will be rental units. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 1D, 1984 PAGE 6 Ms. Gabel asked if anyone in the audience wanted to make any comnents regarding these variance requests. Mr. Leonard Dailey, 8191 East River Road, stated he owned the 5-unit apartment building facing East River Road. He stated he was not opposed to the construc- tion of a 7-unit dwelling. His concern was regarding the drainage so the water run�off was adequately fiandled. Mr. Frank Hegner, 450 Hugo St., stated he lived right across the street from this property. He stated he felt the biggest problem was parking. Most fainilies will have two cars and not everyone is going to put one car in the garage and one in the stall. Even if they did, that is still 14 cars. When friends come over, they are going to be parking on both sides of Hugo. When that happens, there will be no room for emergency vehicles to come through. He also did not want people parking in front of his house. There would also not be any room for Snowmobiles, campers, boats, etc., that people always own. Mr. Hegner stated another concern was where the children are going to play. The children are probably going to go out into the street. Mr. Hegner stated he was not complaining about putting something on that property. He felt something should be built there, but the idea of trying to squeeze a 10- unit, then an 8-unit, and now a 7-unit building onto that property was what the neighborhood was upset about. He would be in favor of a smaller complex. Mr. He9ner stated they are taxpayers and they want to keep this area nice. If a building like this is put up, and it is not taken care of, it is goin9 to brin9 down all the property values in their area. Mr. 6uy Lundsten, 389 Hugo St., stated he was located east of the property. He stated that the garages would be about 13 ft, from his house. If it catches fire, his house would be gone. He stated he works for the Fridley Fire Dept., and he can speak far what Mr. Hegner stated about the emergency vehicles not being able to get through with parking on both sides of Hugo, There are times when they have come down that road and had to back out because they could not get through, and that was with just the regular homeowners. He would agree that a smaller conplex, such as a 4-plex, would be better and would be beneficial to the neighborhood, Mr. Gary Claggett, 440 Hugo St., stated he was against this proposal, because there is too much traffic now from the cars of people a7ready living here and their visitors. He was also concerned about where the children would play besides in the street. Ms. Camilla Schultz, 371 Hugo St., stated Hugo Street is very narrow. If someone is parked on the opposite side of a driveway, it is very difficult to pull out. When two cars are parked on either side, it is very difficult to squeeze through. It was just not feasible to have any more traffic going down Hugo St. Ms. Gabel asked Mr. Clark what the street width was for Hugo. Mr. Clark stated it was a 26 ft. wide street. ! APPEALS COF1tdI5SI0N MEETING JULY 10, 1984 PAGE 7 Mr. Allen Mattson stated he was a partner in MCCK Properties, Inc. He stated they do not need any variances to build a 7-unit apartment building. They are trying to help the neighborhood by building a 7-unit townhouse type building where there will be homeowners. If they build an apartment building, it will be renters with the same amount of people, cars, and children, Mr. Leonard Dailey stated his picture window looks out onto this property� and he would mucli rather see a 7-unit townhouse building put up which will be individually owned than an apartment building, He stated he owns a 5-unit apartment building, and he knows what it is like to try to control renters, and it is not easy. As far as parking, even though he has adequate parking in front of f�is building, people still park over on Ironton St. Ms. 6abe1 stated she thought this was true. They can have a little more controlled parking with a 7-unit townhouse dwelling like what is being proposed and still have parking in the street, or they can have some type of apartment building with no garages and just the required amount of parking required by city code, and there would still be parking in the street. That was a reality the neighbor- hood would have to deal with. Ms. Gabel stated she felt that if Hugo St, is only 26 ft. wide and if there are problems with emergency vehicles going down this street, then there probably needs to be a"no parking" ban on one side of the street, and the City Council should take a look at this. Mr. Mitchell Cook, 420 Hugo St., stated that if they could get "no parking" on the north side of Hugo, that would make a lot of sense. He stated something else to take into consideration is that Hugo is the access to East River Road from Ruth Circle and the neighborhood behind it. He stated he was not concerned about the apartment building, but they want it to be a nice building, and they really do not want to see that amount of people in that area. Their main concern is the heavy traffic already on the street. There is a park 1%Z blocks away, and the children have to walk in the street to get to the park, creating a dangerous situation to the children with even more cars on the street. Mr. Barna agreed that Hugo St. was a very narrow street, but he did not think the 7 additional units would really generate that much of a problem if the parking could be stopped on the north side of the street, Mr. Barna asked the property owners most directly affected by this development if they definitely objected to this development or if they did not object to this development but would like to see certain things changed. Mr. Hegner asked if they could have a 10-minute break to talk it over and come to a decision. Chairperson Gabel declared a 10-minute recess. Ms, fabel asked if the homeowners had come to a decision. Mr, frank Hegner stated that as it stands right now, they would vote against this development, They rrould like to see the development reduced from 7 units � APPEALS COhA1ISSI0N MEETING JULY 10 1984 PAGE 8 to 6 townhouse units, and the garages adjacent to t�fr. Lundsten, 389 Hugo St., be increased from the 5 ft, back to the 10 ft. Mr. Plemel suggested that a stipulation could be to have a fire wall in the garages along the property line. Mr. Allen Mbttson stated he could understand the neighbor's point of view for wanting 6 units. He stated he also hoped the neighbors could understand the petitioners' point of view,and that with the economics, they have to go with a 7-unit apartment building or a 7-unit townhouse building. It was not feasible for them to go with a 6-unit building. He stated he felt they were trying to do the best thing for the City of Fridley and for the people in this area. One homeowner stated he did not want a 7-unit apartment building because it is big and ugly. The neighborhood would be much better off with townhouses where they can be sold to individual owners. MOSION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY MR. PLEMEL, 2� CLOSE TXE PUBLIC XEAftING. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CNAZRPERSON GRBEL DECLARED TXE PDBLIC HERRING CIASED AT 9:Z0 P.M. Mr. Plemel stated he felt a lot of the objections expressed by the neighbors were valid, but he felt the same conditions would exist whether it was a townhouse- type building or an apartment building. He stated it appeared that the developers were trying to do a good job. He would be in favor of the variances with the added stipulation that a fire wall be put in the back of the garages. Ms. Gerou stated that as 7ong as the petitioners can build, whether it was a 7- unit apartment building or a 7-unit townhouse building, she would rather see the townhouse building for the benefit of the neighborhood. She would be in favor of the variances with the following stipulations: 1. drainage plan 2, landscaping plan 3. 172 ft. easement along East River Road 4. fire wall in back wall of garages 5. "no parking" ban on north side of Hugo St. 6. approval of special use permit by Planning Commission Mr, Barna stated that he lives in this area and he looks at this property every day. Knowing definitely that townhouses, especially the way they are being built today, look much better than apartment buildings, he would rather see the townhouses. He realized that economics would not allow six units. In the past, the Comnission reluctantly went along with 10 units on this property. He stated that even though there is neighborhood opposition, he would vote in favor of the variances because he felt this was the best development for the neighborhood. APPEALS COhT1IS5I0N MEETING, JULY 10, 1984 PAGE 9 Mr. Betzold stated the neighbors have raised some valid objections. He thought they were at a particular point where that property is going to remain zoned as it is. The petitioners are determined to develop the property; and if the variances are denied, they are prepared to go ahead with some plans that may not be in the best interest of the neighborhood, He would hope that the developers would continue to work with the neighbors, even though that was not required. He saw no alternative at this point but to approve the variances, and he would support the stipulations mentioned. Ms. Gabel stated she was not real comfortable with this either, She remembered when different proposals have come before them for this property, and this was by far the best proposal, She stated there was no doubt in her mind that this piece of land was going to be developed. She felt the Comnission was in the position to add some stipulations and sane controls to these variances. Under those circumstances, she would be in favor of approving the variances. MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD� SECONDED BY Mft. BARNA, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVRL OF REQUEST FOR VARIANCES PURSUANT TO CHRP':ER 2�'� OF ""'.^. FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDfICE THE REQUIRED SE2BACK FOR A PLANTING STRZP FROt: IS FcET TO 5 FfiET ON THE SZDE YARD ON 2'HE PROPERTY ZONED R-3 (MULTIPLE DWELLINGS)� AND TO REDUCE TXE REQUIRED SETBACX FOR A PLANTING STRIP FROM 10 FEET TO 5 FEET ON THE REAR ANI) SIDE YARDS� AIVD REDUCE THE FRONT YARD SETBACY, FROM 35 FEET TO 25.6 FEES ON L{lT5 78 AND 79� BLOCK A, RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS� TO ALLOW R-1 ZONING (ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS) 21� BE USED FOR R PAP•KING LOT AND GARRGE ZN CONJUNCTION WITH A SEVEN- UNIT MULTIPLE DWELLZNG AT A42 HUGO STREET N.E.� WITX THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: I. THE UNITS BE CONSTRUCTED OF A TOWNHOUSE DESZGN 2. A DRAINAGE PLAN BE APPROVED BY TNE CITY'S ENGZNEERING DEPT, 3, AN AppRp(BD LANDSCAPZNG PLAN 4. A 17} FT. EASEMENT ALQVG EAST RSVER RORD 5, A FIRE WALL AZANG THE EAST SZDE OF THE GARAGES 6. VARIANCES CONTINGENT ON TXE APPROVAL OF THE SPECIRL USE PERMZT BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION UPON A VOICE V02E� ALL VOTSNG AYE� CXAIRPERSON GABEL DECLP.RED TXE MOTION CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY, MOTION BY MR. BET20LD� SECONDED BY MS, GEROU� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL TXAT THEY CONSZDER A"NO PRRKING" REQUIREMENS AIANG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE 400 BLOCK OF HUGO STREET IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE PARKZNG. UPQN A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTIDN CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Gabel stated the special use permit would be heard by the Planning Cortenission on July 18, and then both the variances and the special use permit would go before the City Council on August 6. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 10 1984 PAG_E 10 ADJOURNMENT: MOTSON BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MS. GEROU, 20 AAIOURN THE MEETING. UPON R VDICE VOTE� RT,L VOTING AYE� CHAIREERSON GABEL DECLARED THE JULY 20� 1984� APPEAZS COMMISSZON MEETSNG ADJOURNED AT 9:25 P.M. Respectfully submitted, .� ' `-l� y��Sa a Recording Secretary