The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 10/03/1984 - 6842PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: City of Fridley A G E N � A WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 3, 1984 7:30 P.M. PAGES APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: SEPTEMBER 26, 19H4 At Mtg. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF_ A REZONING REQUEST._ZOA 1- 6 �84-On, LARRY PERLICK: Rezone from Pi- light industrial) to C-P, general office} the Northerly 155' of Lot 9, g Auditor's Subdivision PJo. 7�, to allow the construction of a profession building, the same being 6095 East River Road N.E. 2. LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. N84-09, BURLINGTON NORTHERN: Split 7_ 14 off t e Northerly 5 of Lot , Auditor's Sub ivision No. 78 to make a new building site at 6095 East River Road. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP 15 - 22 H84- S, LEWIS L. FARR: Per Section 205.0 . 3, A, of the Fridley City o e, to a ow the construction of a second accessory building, a 20' x 30' structure to be used for a workshop� on Lot 10, Block 1, Rivers Edge Addition, the same being 157 River Edge Way N.E, q, VACATION REQUEST, SAV �84-04 THOMAS & KATHY SHELTON: Vacate p3 - 29 t e Souther y feet of the North foot uti ity easement on Lot 9, Block 4, Rice Creek Estates, to make a pool location and retaining wall in code compliance, the same being 1571 61st Avenue N.E, � 0 RECEIVE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES: SEPTEMBfR BLUE , 984. OTHER BUSINESS: �lDJOURNMENT: �. , CITY OF FRIDLEV PLANNIN6 COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 26, 1484 CALL TO ORDER: Chairwoman Schnabei called the September 26, 1484, Planning Comnission meeting ta order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CAIt: Members Present: Ms. Schnabel, Mr. Oquist, Fis. 6abe1, Mr. Nielsen, Mr. Saba, Mr. Minton, Mr. Kondrick Menbers Absent: None Otliers Present: Jim Rabinson, Ptanning Coordinator. Scott Holmer� The Lift, 6319 fiighway 65 HUgh ChurCh911, 5955 - 2S, St. N,E. Karl � tAargaret Schurr, 7$18 Alden Way James Faulwelt, Unity Medical Center Tim McKee, Timco Construction, Inc.,9421 W. River Rd, Tom McKee, Timto Construction, Inc.,9421 W, River Rd, Frank Hart, Jr „ 6000 - 3rd St. N.E. OF SEPTEMBER 72. t COMM155ION MOFIOh BY MR, XONDRICK� SECpNDED BY MR. NZELSEN� TO APPP.OVE PXE SEPT, 12, 1984, PL.WNING COMMIS520N HSN�ES AS h*RITTEN, UPpN A V02CE YpTB, Ati VO27NG AYE� CNAZRWpMAN SCHNABEL DECIARED TNE MOTIQY CARRIED UN,9lyIMOUSLY, 1. T IC to ailow an outsi e bo and il, Block 1, Moore Puhlic hearing open. . ��iucrcHilvn vF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #84-15 er ection .., ,. o t e ri ey City o e, t yard and patio furniture disptay on lots 9, �p, Lake Highlands, the same being 5319 Highway a65 N.E. Mr. Robinson stated this property was located on the nprtheast corner of � 63rd Ave, and Highway M65, The zoning was C-2, 7he property was surrounc±ed by R-2 density and singte family density wfth sane commerCial �oning to 2he south. �". Robinson stated the petitioner Nas requesting a speCial use permit for what was presently a canoe storage and sales area, SP¢cial use permit, Staff is tooking at some Stqp�7ation5 �i�unction with the the property up to code, Staff was recommending the fo)towing re�omnendations: e. � PIANNIP�G COMt4ISSI0P1 MEETING SEPTEMBER 26 1984 PAGE 2 1. Restain wooden fence on both sides 2. Provide a screened dumpster location with a solid wood fence on all sides 3, Mulch a11 existing pianting beds. 4. Plant vines on chain link fence where possibie 5. Stripe parking lot b. Provide a timetable pertaining to the provision of finalized site plan includinn parking 7ot setbackS� concr�te cu'rbing, and Eamplete iandscaping. Ms. Schnabet asked the petitioner, Mr. Holmer, if he was agreeable to the above stipulations. Mr. Holmer stated that regarding H2, he dnes have the dumpster fenced in on three sides. The dumpster was tucked up alongside the trailer so it was not visible from the normal public parking. Ne was reluctant to put a gate on the fence because the fence was not engineered far a gate. Ne would have to re-engineer the whole fence or construct a new fence. He agreed that in the past before the trafler was brought in for an additional office facility, the dumpster was in fu71 view, but it wasn't now. Mr. Robinson stated they realiy need a permanent screened d�mpster as that is city code. Mr. Hotmer stated that regarding �3, he fully intended to mulch the planting beds. Mr. Holmer asked for the reasoning for #4, planting vines on chain link fence here ossible. w p Mr. Robinson stated that when he visited the property, there was nothing in the fenced-in area, and the appearance was not very good. The screenin9 provided was pretty limited. He stated a parking loines wouldrbe an economical screened by code. He was suggesting that planting way of screening the parking lot. Mr. Nolmer stated that havineven though he realizedetheUgardentshoptwassonly ahility of the garden shop, open two months out of the year. Ne stated that, as 5taff has suggeste earlier, he had planted trees down the south side and aipine currantsHenreally from public view. of the building, so he felt he had done quite a bit of landscap�n9. felt i#. was unfair to require him to block his facility This Was an outdoor Sales facilitY. the parking lot, he has neg- Mr. Holmer stated that regarding #5, stripin9 'ust neglected to have it striped. Ne stated the lected havin9 thdt done for a number of years. He has to sealcoat the rive- Way yearly,and he has J be �one this fatl. striping w�11 defrnitely � t ` PLANNIfIG COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 26, 1984 _PAGE 3 Mr. Holmer stated that regarding the timetable, he thought it was a 1987 timetable. In order to upgrade the parking, put in concrete curbing, etc., they would lose a good chunk of parking which would basically make them illegal per city code. Mr, Robinson asked Mr. Holmer to explain his long range planning. Mr. Holmer stated he has taken out a 3-year permit for the office facility (trailer}, His long range plans are the same as they have always been, and that is when his optian to buy comes up in the fall of 1986, he will be taking over the buy-out option. As soon after that as is feasibly possible, he will add on to the building. They are cramped for space now, and that is the reason for the permit for the temporary office facility. He stated he was trying to expand as economically as possible, He thought the 1987 time- table was feasible. Mr. Holmer stated he was asking for a special use permit which he thou9ht he had when he went to the Planning Comnission and City Council about five years ago. He had not realized at that time that the special use permit was jost for a garden shop; he had tf�ought it was for aTl outdoor display situations. He had not intended ta be in violation of city code, and this was an attempt to get a permit for what fias been done for the last five years. Mr. Holmer stated that as far as the patio furniture part of the special use permit, at this point in time, he has no intention of putting patio furniture in the Fridley location. He is doing it at his new Hopkins location and may do it in Fridley, if it works well in Hopkins. He had included the patio furniture in the special use permit request so that he would not have to come back for a special use permit at a later date. Mr. Robinson stated a solution for the fencing of the dumpster on all four sides could be a chain link fence with wooden slats. Mr. Holmer stated that sounded like a good solution, and he would probably do that. Mr, Oquist stated that regarding planting vines on the chain link fence to screen the parking, it would take 2-3 years for the vines to be thick enough to have any affect. By then, P4r. Holmer might be taking that fencing down. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICX, SECONDED BY MR, SAPA, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AV SP k84-IS BY THE LIFT SKI AND BIXE. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHASRWOMAN SCHNASEL DECLARED�SHE PUBLIC HEAHING CLOSED AT 8:04 P.M. Mr. Saba stated he also questioned the stipulation requiring vines to be planted on the chain link fencing. He did not think it was a viable option, and wouid like ta see that stipulation deleted, PLANNING COMMISSIQN MEET_I_NG_, SEPTEMSER 26, 1984 PAGE 4 Mr. 4quist agreed that stipulation should be deleted. He stated that as far as the stipulation requiring the dumpster to be screened on all sides with a solid wood fence, he wouid like to see that changed to not specify a wood fence. Mr. Robinson su9gested, and the Comnissioners agreed, that this special use permit should be scheduled for review in three years. NOTION BY MR, qjUIST,,SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TQ RECOMMEND Tb TNE CSTY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP p85-19, 8Y LIFlG SXI AND BZKE, PER SECTION 205.14.1, 3, C, OF TNE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO ALLOW AN DUSSIDE BOAT YARD AND PATIO FURYITURE DISPLAY ON LOTS 9, 10 AND I2, BLOCK 1, MOORE LAf:E HZGN.LANDS, TNE SAME BEING 6329 HIGXWAY li65 N.E., WITN THE FOLLOWING STZPUALATIONS: Z. RETAIN A WOODEN FENCE ON BOTH SIDES. 2. PROVIDE A SCREENED DUMPSTER IACATION WZTH A FENCE ON RLL SIDES. 3. MULCH ALL EXISTING PLANTING BEDS. 4. STRIPE PARKING LOT. 5. PROVIDE A TIMETABLE PERTAZNING TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE FINALIZED SITE PLAN INCLUDZNG PARKING IAT SETBACKS, CDNCRETE CURBZNC AND COMPLETE LANDSCAPING. 6. THIS SPECIAL USE PERNIT BE REVZEWED BY COUNCIL IN TNREE YEARS. UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE, CHAIRWQMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TNE MOTION CARRIED UNIMOUSLY. t Ms. Schnabel stated this item would go to Council on October 15th. 2. PUEiLIC HtARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #�84-11 UNITY ER Y J FIN H INES: Per Section 05.0 ., , B, to a ow expansion o t e par �ng ots of Unity Hospital, 550 Osborne Road and the Professional 8uilding at 500 Osborne Road, located on Parcels 600 and 2400 in the North Half of Section 11, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. (Complete legal description on file with the City) MOTSON BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. HINTON� Tq OPEN TXE PUBLIC HEARING ON SP p84-1T, UNITY MEDICAL CENTER BY JOXN HAINES, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CNAZRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TXE PUBLIC XEARING OPEN gT B:IQ P.M. Mr. Robinson stated the Unity Hospital comp7ex, located on Osborne Road east of University Ave., was contemplating a major parking redevelopment and expansion for completion in the spri�g 1985. He stated city staff has worked with the petitioners to come up with the present plan. The total of new parking stalls is approximately 250 with the proposed addition. He stated the plan was an improvement in terms of circulation, Mr. Tan PicKee, Timco Construction, Inc., stated one of the reasons for this plan was to get better controt of the traffic. They felt this was a good plan and would help eliminate a lot of the confusion that has been existing. Ms. Schnabel asked about lighting. Mr. Tom McKee stated the parking lot wi11 be well lit. He stated that is a concern of the hospital also because of the second and third shift employees. He stated the lighting plan wi11 be submitted to the City for approval. They will try to reflect the lights into tfie parking lot rather than out of the parking lot into the neighborhood. PLANNING COMMISSIQN MEETING SEPTEMBER 26 1984 PAGE 5 Mr. Robinson stated Staff was recommending the following stipu)ations: 1. An approved landscaping plan Z. An approved lighting plan 3. An approved signage plan 4, An approved drainage plan 5, A $15,000 performance bond. Mr. Tom M�Kee stated they had no problem with any of those stipulations. MOTIDN BY MR, KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. MZNTON� TO CLOSE TXE PUBLZC HEARZNG ON SP f184-17� UNZTY XOSPITAL CENTER BY JOHN HAINES. UPON A YOSCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHASR►70MAN SCHNABEL DECLARED 2HE PUBLIC XEARZNG CLQSED AT 8:30 P.M, MOTION BY MR. XDNDRZCK� SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST� TO RECOMMEND TO CTTY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PEFMIT, SP #84-17, UNITY MEDICRL CENTER BY .70HN HAZNES, PER SECTION 205.07.Z� 3� B� T6 RLIAW TXE EXPANSIt�iV OF THE PARKING ZATS OF UNITY HOSPITAL, 550 ASBOFNE ROAD AND THE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINC RT 500 OSBORNE ROAD� LOCATED ON PARCEIS 600 AND 2400 IN THE NORTX NALF OF SECTION l.t, T-3D, R-24, CITY OF FRIDLEY, COUNTY OF ANOKA� MINNESOTA� WITH TNE FOLLOWZNG STIPULATIONS: I, AN APPROVED ZANDSCAPING PLAN 2. AN ApPROVED LIGHTING PLAN 3. AN APPROVED SIGNAGE PLAN 4. AN APPROVED DRAINAGE PLAN 5. A"$IS,D00 PERFORMANCE $OND UPDN A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTSNG AYE, CXAZRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, Ms. Schnabel stated this item would go to City Council on October 15. 3. LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #84-10, HUGH CHURCHILL: Split off the Northerly 8 feet of Lot 29, combined with Lot 3�, 61ock 11, Hyde Park, to make a new builr�ing site at 5963 2 1/2 Street N,E. Mr, Ro6inson stated the property was in Hyde Park, which is a special zoning district. It is located on the southeast corner of bOth Ave. and 2z St. Mr. Robinson stated the original proposal was to add 8 ft. on to the corner lot which was 40.64 ft., making a lot width of 50.64 ft. This would make the square footage of the new lot 6,611 sq. ft. in studying this a little further, Staff had found some concerns that should be addressed, He stated an application has been filed jointly with this for a variance on the lot size since since it would be less than 7,500 sq, ft. Mr. Robinson had discovered that in the Hyde Park area, the minimum lot width is b0 ft., so one ofi the stipulations would be that Mr. Churchill also apply for a variance for the 60 ft, lot width as well as the square footage of the lot of less than 7,50� sq. ft. PLANNIN6 COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 26, 1984 PAGE 6 Mr. Robinson stated Staff would also request that the petitioner split off a minimum of 10 ft, He can do this and still maintain the setback needed, He presently has 16.5 ft. so he would still have more than 5 ft. The reason Staff is asking for this is that when there is a lot split, they require an attached garage. With an attached garage, he would need a 5 ft, setback from the lot line. 4. In addition, code requires a double car garage. So, with a 5 ft, setback and a 22 ft. garage and the 25 ft. setback which is required for a double garage from the street, the petitioner would, in fact, need 10 ft. instead of 8 ft. which was originally proposed, Mr. Ro6inson stated Staff would recommend the following stipulations: 1. Lot split to be contingent upon approval of variances for: reduced lot area less than 7,500 sq. ft, and iot width less than 60 ft. 2. Split off a minimum of 10 ft, to atlow for attached garage 3. Provide an attached two-car garage 4, Provide a survey of the existing corner lot to verify dimensions Mr. Robinson stated one other concern was that if the Planning Commission approves this lot split, are they creating the need for the variances? It 6ecomes a matter of policy. Ms. Schnabel stated it has been city policy in the past that the city has not allowed development on 4� ft. lots unless they meet a certain minimum lot size. The City has always felt that it wanted to maintain certain minimum sizes to be more consistent with the city overall. In fact, the City prefers, if possible, that the adjacent property owner or owners split the 40 ft. lots;and if it is a corner lot that the adjacent property owner keep the property rather than develop a 40 ft. lot. Ms. Schnabel stated that in the past also, the City felt it did not want anything less than a 60 ft. lot in Hyde Park and that was the reason the ordinance was passed. So, there was a problem with the width and the minimum iot size of this proposed lot split request. Ms. Schnabel stated the Hyde Park area has some unusual lot sizes and commer- cial mixed with residential,because there was not a lot of tight controls when it was originally developed. Part of the reason the whole Hyde Park neighborhood area was developed was to try to preserve tf�e integrity of the neighborfiood,to upgrade it and make it a more desirable area, to improve the area, to get the neighborhood more conscious of its surroundings and image and preserve it's neighborhood. Ms. 5chnabel stated they should also address the fact that they are creating the need for variances if the lot split is approved, and a house was to be built on the lot. The Planning Comnission has to decide how they feel about creating the need for variances. Mr. Saba stated if they approve this lot split, the approval should be based on the approval of the Appeals Comnission on the variances. If the variances are not apprnved, the lot split would not be approved. � PIANNIF�G COMMISSIOt� t•1EETING, SEPTEFI6ER 26. 1984 PAGE 7 Mr, Oquist stated the only varia�ces they are actualiy requiring are the lot width and the lot size. Once the lot split was approved. it was his understanding that a house could be built on the lot without any variances. Ms. Schnabel esked if there was anyone in the audience who would like to make any comments about this request. Mr, Frank Hart. 6000 3rd St., stated he was at the meeting out of curiosity and would have no o6jection to the lot split. Mr. Robinson stated that if the Planning Commission was uncomfortable with making a recorrenendation at this time, they might want to take a look at what kind of house could be built on this property and also wait and look at this request again after it goes to the Appeals Commission for variances, Mr. Saba stated he would be more comfartable with looking at this again after the Appeals Commission's decision. Mr. Minton agreed with Mr, Saba. Mr. Oquist stated having a variance with a lot split really bothered him. lf the Appeals Commission approves the variances, the Planning Commission shouid approve the lot split. It was almost like the Appeals Commission should rule on this and not the Planning Commission, because the variances almost take a precedent over the lot split. There just seemed to be some- thing wrong with this combination. MOTZON BY MR. KONDRICK.TO APPROV£ ZOT SPLIT REpUEST� L.S. M84-10, BY HUGH CXURCHILL. MOTION DZED FOR LACK Of A SECOND. MOTION 9Y MR. MINTbN� SECI�NDED BY MR. SABA, TO TABLE DISCUSSION ON LOT SPLIT REpUEST, L.S. N89-20� BY NUGH CHURCHILL UNTIL THE PLANNING COMMZSSZON RECEIVES THE MINUTES FROM 2'XE RPPEALS COMMISSION XEETINC OF OCT, 9. UPON A VOICE VOTE, MZNTI�N AND SRBA VDTING AYE, KONDRICK VOTING NAY, AND GABEL AND OpUIST ABSTASNING� CNASRWOMRN SCXNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRSED BY A VOTE OF �-1. Ms. Schnabel stated this item would be tabled until the Planning Comnission receives the minutes of the Appeals Comnission meeting on Oct. 9. Mr. Churchill stated he would think the City would want to see this 1ot improved and looking better. He stated he was tired of going through a11 this trouble. and he would just as soon have the City refund his money, and he would forget the whole thing. PIANNIN6 CdMMISSION MEETING SEP7EMBER 26 1984 PAGE 8 � Ms. Schnabel stated that if Mr. Churchilt wanted to withdraw his request, he was certainly free to do so. Mr. Churchill stated he would like to withdraw his lot split request, 4. VACATION REQUEST 5AV #84-03, MINCO PRODUCTS BY KARI SCHURR: Vacate 73rd Avenue etween ot 5, oc , ommerce ar an ot , Block 1, Paca Industrial Park from Commerce Circle West to the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks. Mr. Robinson stated this property was located on 73rd St. The petitioner has requested that 73rd, which is not a through street and deadends at the railroad tracks, be vacated from Commerce Circle back to the railroad tracks. This would allow the petitioner to use the area for green space and ponding and would improve his setback requirements. 8ecause he is actually the only property owner, no one else is affected by this vacation, Mr, Robinson stated Staff was recortmending the foliowing stipulations: 1, Existing utility easements which presently transect 73rd St. are not to be vacated. Z. P.rovide a 5 ft, wide utility easement a7ong the north of 73rd St. rigfit of way for buried NSP line 3. Provide a 15 ft. wide utility easement along the south of 73rd St. for buried Minnegasco line Mr, Robinson stated these utility easements would not affect the petitioner's plans, MOTZON BY MR. XONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. MINTON� SO RECOMMEND TO CZTY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF VACATION REQUEST, SAV k84-03, MINCO PRODUCTS BY XARL SCXURR� TO VACATE 73RD A[�ENUE BETWEEN SAT 5� BLOCX 4, COMMERCE PARK AND LOT 13� BLOCK 1, PACO FNDUSTRSAL PARK FROM COMMERCE CZRCLE WEST TD SHE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD TRACKS� WITH TNE FOLLOWZNG STIPULATIONS; 1, EXISTING UTILITY EASEMEN2S WXICH PRESENSLY TRANSECT 73RD ST. ARE NOT TO BE VACATED, 2. PROVZDE A 5 FT. WSDE UTSLITY EASEMENT AIqNG 2HE NORTX OF 73RD ST. RZGHT OF WAY FI�R BURZED NSP LINE. 3. PROVIDE A 15 FT. WIDE UTZSSTY EASEMENT AZANG THE SOUTH OF 73RD S2. FOR BURIED MINNEGASCO LINE. . UPAN A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAFRWAN.§N SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, Ms. Schnabel stated this item would go to City Council on November 5. f PLANNI146 COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 26 1984 PA6E 9 5. RECEIVE SEPTEMBER 6, 148A, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. MINTON� 5BCONDED BY MR. KQNDRICK� TO RECEZVE THE SEPT, 6� .2984, X[IMAN RESOURCES COMMISSIDN MINUTES. Mr. Minton stated the Human Resources Commission looked at the Affirmative Action Plan for the City of Fridley. Their main purpose for doing that was to monitor on an ongoing basis the hiring and promotion of women and minorities in the City. They received a five year report, 1975-1980, and that report showed quite a bit of advancement, especially in the promotion or hiring of women in higher positions in the City. The Comnission was quite satisfied with the report. He stated Staff will be providing an updated report from 1980 - present, and they will see if there is any further progress. When he gets the updated report, he will pass it on to the Planning Commission. Ms. Schnabel stated she would appreciate receiving a copy of the 1975-1980 report and the new updated report, 5he stated she appreciated the Numan Resources Commission's interest in the Affirmative Action Plan. UPON A VOICE S�OTE� ALL VOTSNG AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTSON CARRIED UNANZMOUSLY. 6. RECEIVE SEPTEMBER 18, 1984, APPEALS COMMISSION MINU7ES: MOTION BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. XONDRICK� TO RECE3VE THE SEPT. 18, I984� APPEAIS COMMISSION MSNUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRD70MAlJ SCHNABEL DECL1iRED THE MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. XONDRICX� SECONDED BY MR. NIELSEN� TO ADJOURtJ THE MEETING. UPOtJ A VOICE VOTE, RLL VOTING AYE, CXAIRWOMAN SCHHABEL DECLARED TNE SEPT. 26� 1984, PLANNING COMMZSSIDN MEETING ADJOURNBD AT 10;00 P,M. Respectfully submi ted, � Lyn e Saba Recording Secretary PUBLIC NEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Comnission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, October 3, 1984 in the Louncil Chamber at 7:30 P.M. for the purpose of: Consideration of a Rezoning Request. ZOA �84-04, by Larry Perlick, to rezone from M-1 (light industrial) to C-R1 (general office) the Northerly 155 feet of Lot 9, Auditor's Su6division No. 78, to allow the construction of a professional building, located in the North Half of Section 22, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. Generalty located at 6095 East River Road N.E. Any and e>> persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. YIRGIWIA SCHNABEL CHAIRWOMAN PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: Septem6er 17, 1984 September 24, 1984 i CITY OF FqIDLEY. s�7t UN�vEps�rr INE. NE. FqlplEV. MN.6507L 16�7/,671-3460 SUBJECT ZONING ACTION zoa k,� y-o Y YACA7ION SAV N PIAT P5 N ORDINANCE NO PUBLISHED ADDRESS lG'D�IS �t+� /�.-� /�°-^--'�- DATE PLANNING COtM7ISSI0N: APPROYED DISAPPROYED DATE � O�' 3 N0. CITY COUNCIL: PUBLIC HEARING DATE iST READ 2ND READ CItY COUNCIL: APPROYED DISAPPROYED DATE ND PARK fEE REQUIRED: AMbUNT PAID STIPULATIONS: — �, . „ �9•�,ey /�',E�C'L�UC „ NAME/��cl,t�,�,�/�IT/c-r��i�F-�'///C ��a.AeF FEE/o� +?•-�. RECEIPT NO /�� STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY ��35 LJ4�T e�.G:�/� ,��9/7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY N_ /SS� n. _�-s- S Q.S�76�_ PRESENT 20NING CLASSIFICATION�_EXIST{�NG USE OF PR�PERTY li.s�r,��-- ACREAGE OF PROPERTY � 5 DESCRIBE BRIEF�Y THE 9R070SED ZONING CLA55IFICATION �R TYPE OF USE AND IMPROYEMENT PROPOSED C�—/ ��F�s's,e.t�.�l �/�itf C:'(,�•��LLL�; -- Has the present applicant previously sought to rezone, plat, obtai� a lot split or variance or special use permit on t�he subject site or part of it? �yes no. What was requested and when? �p% ��/f �G��,�a,c„ �.�� i �� ICEC�E��% The undersigned understands that: (a) A list of all residents and owners of proper- ty within 350 feet must be attached to this application (rezoning), 300 feet, (plat- ting), wlla be aitac�ed to'this 8pp17iation. '(b) This application must be signed Gy all owners of the property, or an explanation given wfiy this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any defect in the proceedings resulting from the failure to list the names and addresss of all residents and property owenrs of prop�rty in question, belongs to the undersigned. A sketch of proposed property and structure must be drawn and atitached, showing the following: 1. North directiun. 2. Location of the proposed structure on the lot. 3. Dimensions of property, proposed structure, and froa and side setbacks. 4. Street names. 5. Location and use of adjace�t existing buildings (within 350 feet). 7he undersi�ned hereby declares that all the facts and respre tations stated in this application are true and correct. DATE SIGNA7UR —�—'--`� ADDRESS $YO� L�F�i.�' .�iC � TELEPHDNE NO �8`� i3c'/ � Mailing List ZOA N84-04, Larry Perlick M-1 to C-R1 6095 East River Road Larry Perlick 8406 Center Drive Minneapolis, Mn 55432 Jane L. Van Bergen 6100 Startite Boulevatd N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 I4aynard Nielson 7144 Riverview Terrace N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Robert DeGardner 1438 North Danube Road N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. William Iskierka 100 River Edge Way N.E Fridley, MN 55432 Independent School District 14 Fridley Senior High School 6000 West Moore Lake Drive N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mark Finneman 4175 Lovell Road New Brighton, MN 55112 Burlington Northern Railway 176 East 5th Street St. Paul, Mn 55101 Mr. & Mrs. Robert Lindberg 105 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Leonard Witucki 101 River Edge Way N.E. fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. 8 Mrs. Dick Cheng 6130 Starlite Blod. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55�32 Mr. & Mrs. Dale Owens 6120 Starlite Blvd. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Planning Commission 9/18/84 Mr. 6 Mrs. Kenneth Erickson 6110 5tarlite Blvd. N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Fred Harvey 108 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Alden Robertson 104 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 3 � � �� 'i � � i �ii �� / �Ur �,8,0 � �Y_.. i 't' , • � ' S � � �� G��l iile , r;f e • M T � w ~( � � � r �� / I � 5 + I � J � � �ij� d21iD � c� � � •�' � � . . . • • •i � ' 1 �+ i '� i ��✓, � s N' 1 I s I•� � � � ' � �O S �i! /f0 � t s y 3 �:�� y .r �� 6i� + �� p M fi I ` ' ' � dI 1�'t � � `\ Mi° J � - ' � � �� r �� . I � ' �70 < „ 1 �1�1. �, s t � � 1• p �� r ' i A ' „ � _ -- r p ,» , a8 te�� , - '� — - t �.. jr.. - J. ,�� « . .. ' r +' �; � p t (p `,,v �wr �o ' ' J. ft .�L (rM' ' ��► - -- 'I � j� � „� G.a� I.�.,slr.•!. 4 �J�� r � ' I G .vG. �� 12 � ', 19 '� T 1� ,,, NSON i �...• „ � ; ,CL �:, . 1.. I ,....r..i,w f� - ' _ .r ., � : I � (soo) � - - -- ,� : I � Z _ - ,� : «. , � ,.� i R/YER ; � � �c.-�� ,,- , � ; � � � � � �i�so) lo� ; 596 E.RR � � _ : . �_ , � _J � � . ,. � R�oo ; k �`�`_ ` : ` - � � � `, 93 _ �. � ; �.. � �A 11 � i �i �� . �i✓r.yrii�.� r+�� Z t �R R ; . �`; �, I 1 rlfA N.C-^+'�`, '�• � I �� o..,rN_ �y r�'' I. , �' (�rrl � 3 � � • �..� _ � �TA S�fff iL�'�• F� > �icn cYln` ' /!,'. :,� ► : I ��• _ �—T - �� r � _ � � ,� - � -�- - -- 1 3�� _ � a�°' i �i , ,; , i � � � i � k � - � �-� ��. i ' �• 0 ° s �. N � o= � ; � n �� ' � � � ; � � � � 455rs: . � _,,�� :�, �� G �I .��`8t' R� � �i':°r4 °, � �:� � 'S��Y �, • 6. �� iE � a- i - u � � � �� R Y P �Y i *' .� � � . . r'b , : i � i� � 1 v+. i r� �=i i J �'` ; � _ � r � � _ �� ., � �b Rf' t 4 � 7 I�.� � : i v w � i R I 3 . �.. n � _.__. . � 7 CITY Oi FF11DLtY. � SUBJECT sna� uMVCas�r� ws. �w. swirxsr. ww. osue ��+r,ss�-a�se 6o9s r�ars � l� c � � v LOT SPLIT LS I $`�-O 9 KAlQi1NG COMIISSION: APPROVEC , OISAPPROYED DJ1TE �`t'6'%j M� �1TY COUNtII: APPROYED D151►PP80YED ORTE 1ro �ARK fEE IlFQU1RE0: STIPULATIONS: PROPERTY OWMER(S AD7RE55 �T PAID, ae+f7�t1FEE RECEIPT NO % � 3�' � TELEVHONE NO iELfDHONE NO r.�. �2 . — i � 66 00 ��-ac� tE-�F PROPERTY LOCATION ON STREET �fLNE.Z C.�srw�`'( ��-''�"S� �+ "E�" �- LEWL DESCR1PT10N OF PROPERTr TOTAL AREA OF PROPERTY �� Pv s.3�� ►"er� iRESENT ZONING ��M� f . r REASON FOR l0T SPL1T �T�� cT o F F t CE w A-�M-o � S� TAe undersigned�hereby dtclares that all the tacts and representations stated in this �pplication sre true and corrcct. a�: �G- 3/ J ¢� � NOTICE: A sicetch of the propertY and the proposed lot split Mith tures sM►+n should accoapany this application. �' (See reve'rse side for �dditional instructions) istin9 strut- 0 Effective January 17, 19BL 7984 POLICY STAYDiENT ON YARR FfiES ON LAND SIIBDIVISION , / Date � ✓ � 3 ( ` �� y In determining fair market value of public areas fo� land subdivision for cash payment as requirod Dy Ordinance I633, Lhe following values will be used: Residential Subdivision Resldential Lot Split Commercial/Indu�trial Subdivislon or Lot Split E1,500.00 per lot f 750.00 per lot = 0.023 Per sQ. ft. This fee is to be paid at the time of final plat or lot split approval. The City Councll may defer collection to the time a Du11d1ag permlt is requested for indlvidual lots created Dy such subdivisioN lot aplit. The City retains the option to accept an equivalent amount in cash from the applicant for part or all of the portion required to be dedicated. PARR FEE AGAEEl�NT The undersigned underatands that according to the City Pla'ting Ordinance, the following public park land dedicatlon is required to plat residential, commercial or industrial zoned property. It is further understood that the public park land dedication or cash payment equivalent is at the discretlon of Lhe Clty. It is agreed that a cash payment of ��V ��& � will De paid aecording to the aDove stated policy for tAe following subdivisionJlot split. voo.�. � s s ��rti� o� g�i��.� �, �� T It is agreed t_Sh�.fQllowing laad-ded#eation is.pr-0vSded d po 'Cy—Por—L-hc-�oi3vpz�g-sIIVn�7 s on, ot aDlit. Dedication: SuDdiviaion/Lot Split The undersigned further agrees to notiiy all future property owners or aesigns of the cash payment requiremeat, if it is Lo be collected at Lhe time of Seauanee of a building permit. Date: ` ��' q� 3/0/8/8 L•' i �.... ...� _ — �.�.. a,�.. xe i �, a a � � N � � � �� ;� ,��. ,, ,r. �, c " � ;� t e �; � ° d /i .� � 'F� � �� ..,� �� _,_ '"�� ,.. � ii I u T 1 ww�� 1� � ♦ —� - . �� A 1� 4C 1 S � 4s . � � I � GUJ� , „ .. �U'v � �,' J �� 3C,, `; � .... " ', �� v v v J.1 � .._ � '� � > > ) �i �...: � �..V i d 4v �� . . �� P�ut'6�V =._ �J� c .. o� �'�F'! I �v ;-�'_'�%.'� , � �: GL�^ � � c : : , . ,, .. �e•m � ., . c n,,� � - — �' + � � ,�� C. .. � � o . ._ ^�� ... � li � i ..� J _..: C� � ' � C �� , � ,, , .._..�.. � ° n a � — ._ x;� ' ' ' ; � .,!—yo "�c � c �/, , � � . ,� � .� �" �:'L/ ,�' � � p J J�- .. � � � n f r. n ^ 6 �� " � �`. •„�. � , , � r // �� i i �i Y' .'i' ' � i ' L=1•`:"-:,, .....� 'i � ii rn'di��,: i � � •� �I I'� L•,� �'�� f 1 1 �1 � � , ,, .,.a �.��r -, � � , , � ?'�•. �� :� � �� I ' 1 ' �' � �, �.� r, ? � �, ,, � � �.: � , ;, .. - � � �� _ , ,; . �� , , ; . � . � �� , ; . ; �.__._. `� , - �� .:� �? . 6 � l: Mr+ � ' ; .\ J`,If� ,,• ''' �� 1 / � � � — 1 —^��Oi f A w.�.�.,,� i � v I! � i n r� � � • c�� i ± ► �`�'�' �I 1 ; �, - -.. , .-.. . U �'�� " ��'�E �/ / c \� � ..'._. �. J 1 ..�1r ' 'M�� J�� :�" � �� /!+j�` �.—nL - ,.,.,, \, � � � ,,�� io - --- - -.�•..• -� � .�'L ., a�* � o,;s,; �w��`1 - . rfe uw. � - r...d i . _ , i ' :� � 9 }y I � i� � . p ' , � � x ' �' T � 0 , Olb � .L rf , Z.�Q 1 �I . . .:�� I .P �6 � � ' 8' O � . ;..�{� � . �. - ; . . .. 1 � 1 • ; �. � j1K( 1. � � {Q � ,. . . ' (��.. � A , , G. 4�� , • �' + -:=i '' � � , �`. , , ,.`k' ', � . � . • ; . , . ;, , : . . � `�. . -- i r( �� '4� •Py - � 1 � .�` ' . �..; ., " ' � '`-� ;; . • =; � _ ', � ° � �� .. ;,"`' ;� �' � �` �� .�-��+ r� - �=�'� '�'`:� ��.�ie#.. � ._�, , �; :: :;�,� , .; "� ., � �� ` �'r,�`t�� m�` '�� o � , . ' `�,r,i- . :�� i � . : �j!►` i ','' , ' _ _ r r �a ,�Sa L ..�t __ _ — _ _ _' _' ,, �. " �� ------- ��--- - ---- - .- -- � , , ,. . �� '' ;' {�� •_i-. � .! s: , :' ' i �` � ' �. f ' �' �- ' r// ' •' ' � � I� � ;� . , � � .,, , � . � � ; i � � ' �� i.' / —0 I r— f — � � I I� S� 1 � �i ♦, ` V • � �— II � • � .;•...{�, r : _ � .. .'S 1 � � � � �1 � . � ' �� . �. I . � Z '. : �. �R t �' �� F�' 1 r ; (;, M !I'.''�Y�� : � i �� . . i . R j i 1 ! � . i " I I i . � . , {e , e �'- , I i � � � , • v � 1 4a r Y' _ ;. ; I �� i ' M. � . ; . , r � •� � : � 1� ; : �. , • � I �H t � � J. . r . �• ' �. • I �•� •i�' � 1. i 1-- {+ r � j 1 : � - ;� � 1 � ,- � : :: i = � ,. II: � i' .. _.._' __ , i . . _cJ. . � i, i � i a �' � . � 1 .� l•?� I -• :ts � � �.� tr � �'� ! _ .:`� yrtlPat 31 .'_Y ..: ,. - ; t: .y4 � �`t�"�t,- � ' �:.� � . �� ' r � ,r.��y�� t� •: �, - f .! �� . : � • � t t� �� • � + I �� , ,.,� , �. � � .. �' �'- ty, "�- „� �° . 11 , .., � ..>' 4 ` 'l. ` � y� ; � .�°`r. � � : � `l-•�� ;� ' j. .. � -�a 4 4 � � ;' ,%-G-_� � � � � . � - • t �• � �� .�+ r'r � Z. ' h ,~��_ . L �'.� .. ".r .^ � 1'`� i r'a ---` —�„v, a. � � � �� T-,; ,�.�-� �,,,�yp�1 ► � , .�, � r""i�,, '�,, ♦- 4 s�,�'j�r:� � ; t�� r ` .�' y - �� '��,,, y t�i � ,.* � ; , -P ) � ; tt Y'' ✓ -, P a: �i '_Y.. • K , t l_ . � .i �� .l - . l�.d ��_ . s . . : � , .�1 � ± �'; }�R y+�� z' 7 >'-' F ,Y " -.;.�. _J'iY;: > - !�' _^\ �+.'v.:�.-s".� i ~ ��t,ri .j�_.� 6 .��4�r• 1f'. N+t%'- - �� r.�t '%-r. �, T4� � * i ; � �� * . y,� � n T.�- c�� ,l x�� 7� �:, �� r:� ��' ��^ �� , ;;: _ �.`'��,' ,` �� wY� j �� •� f � �� I��i;{ .L�1 ~ � x �! G! ..J • ' r � : • s _ � � �? _ ��' .�� . - �• J �� ♦ 4J. • ,• t ,�� 1 S +Ag}%" _ ,� �. t: •�� -�'. �� b g! � i .i rr � � .fr.� '.��+i.i� � �! �` � 4 �1 �.;{� � :�`:r '�`- . 1�i• '�� - 4� ;�f - r- ' --�f - ; . YII�,I�"-' .�fc -, s s � �; � : `� ��'� ��# � < < : �"� :, , : �1 jr• �`; ^�,�„'" r;;' ! < • .t � - ,,,"' `�` � E ,� �. � �: i � ' + � � � � � ' i b r� t� . ' � �� . '_� f .'s . �. � i i . �S • k e ��'r; � �� ' , � ` ', � •'' y} �� •�'�: -� � � �• S ,: � `` I ` ' ` �, J • ' f + � �� -. �`�• � r I � i _-'�`+ .R . ; .� � r /� y � {�. . � . / _•.%��. ��'; '• . �Is�� 1`.�. , :a � � � • �li�; 4 ` ` � _� i �� `r>� �r. � ��: `'�,� � : . .�- � �1 � : � `� : ►': ' >'�' � . r f �� f • ' �� t l': • � ;'� ,?- ,Y , ,, � �' -�. � � '► �� ` : �. : ' � {;� �� *� � ��v�►_ • ' ' ' , :�� 1':,�'`}.�,_.�.-l• _ ';� :: % '°�- 'r-t _ � =� �- � . �j ,, '= t>{, � s J f� .t,a �s?x�' '•, ::-; _ � 1 �, - r ��fi,. i . F��,` � fj. r,b� _�:�t.�. ��' e ;� ,�� - ,- . ,._ � � s� /`f `�' it� �f- � � ' i �+,. �� ._ : e' �r _�`ir.� - . .. ;i �� 1 � -�w -� - �• � - � - - � _�lS�o �.� �`4 _ --��r I � , . : a x � ,�. i i. i � � o � ( . � o� M� �a 6S O' DS'o•s to��a' — _ -' -�� .Le•n.a s�+uS I _ I ° r �n - � w - e, � 8 _ � I � , �. �' �s' �o -4� ,; �s. �1)i�b � l�D:. S[:�Kq n I "� Ma/ � n � ^ 1 � � I � c I � - — —i�: _ o � i ' ' . ;o � r•o` % i� 1 0� ' I" � dia l� I� �� e o �� o i� . � � - -� s 4� L � Q1 n ' � O � b � I-0 r_+4-- _ Ga'. ,��— a5-°�:'— -_ �-i- � — :e.�� G rw�... '_-�...t V � I - 'u y C _ h ( ' N � �_ I i �� d i b � r' k� • �� V 1 i� rj � •� � � �. � 13 � � BURLJNGTON NORTHERN RAIIROAD PROPERTY MANAGEMENT Mr. G. R. Taylor Coldwell Banker 66D0 France Ave. South Minneapolis, MN 55435 Dear Rob: 176 East Fiftn Street St Paul, Minneso;a 55101 August 28, 1989 A recent request was made in reference to exflanding the Burlington Northern parcel size proposed for Communications 6 Special Software for a site on East River Rd. near I-694 in Fridley. Burlington Northern would be unable to allocate this additional property. Further reduction of the original parce] size will severely restrict the utilization of the remaining site. As you know, there is an existing lead track adjoining and proper use for such an arrange- ment would dictate a miniroum of 10 acres. This would apply for an expansion of an adjoining industry or a new industrial site. By the proposed one acre sa1e, we are reduced down to approximately 8 acres. Very truly yoUrs, �� { ("�...._ A. `2. Nelson Senior Property Development Specialist ia PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNIN�i LOMMISSION Notice is hereDy given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Cortmission af the City of Fridtey in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Mednesday, October 3, 1984 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 P.M. for the purpose of: Consideration of a request for a Special Use Permit, SP M84-16, by Louis L. Farr, per Section 205.17.1, 3, A, of the fridley City Code, to allow the construction of a second accessory building, a 24 ft. by 30 ft. structure to be used as a workshop, on Lot 10, Block l, River Edge Addition, the same being 157 River Ed9e Way N.E. Any and a>> persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. V]RGINIA SCHNABEL CHAIRW�MAN PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: September 17, 1984 September 24, 1984 15 CITV OF FRIDLFY� ��B�ECr Na7 UNIVEA6ITY �Vt. Nt. fA1DLEr� MN. 6Y�! Ii1T,67L7�f0 ADORESS�.S�% % PLANNING COIAAISSION: CITY OOI�ICII: STIPULATIONS: SPECIAL USE PERNIT Lv A 16 SP ! �7�/� �-1� 8 �1 APPROVED DISIIPPROVED DATE /0 — 3 H0. APPROVED OISAPPROYED DATE NO `" �/ `� NAME 12 w� S �� FA �R� FEE lU� RECEIPT N0� STREET LOLATION OF PROPERTT .S` I Vf � E Ii �� W A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Of:PROPERTY iCOT JO SLOG/� %n "�_ PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION��EXISTING USE OF PROPER7Y r/��-S�OaNTiA�— ACREAGE Of PROPERTY DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE fPECIAL USE APPLIED FOR: ��°,�� «.€�2►-y R ,��N� h,X 3J. Section of the Code• v70 rj p% ! �� Z— Has the present applicant previously sou9ht to re2one, pint. obtain a lot split or variance or special use permit on the subject site or part of it? �yes no. Mhat was requested and when?�••°�-••-� 7o Bu+�D ATtAcfaDG�R�GF'. �•�n�,}T /SSv�D A�+G. �7�19T — The undersigned undentands that: (a} A list of a1l residents and owners of proDer- ty within 20(1 feet will be attached to this application. .. • • � � � �. � '(b) This application must be signed by a11 owners of the qroperty, or an exp�anation �jiven rrhy this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any .lefect in the proceedings resulting from the failure to list the names and addresss of alt residents and property owenrs of property in question, belongs to the undersigned. �5 F� �I7�srAm..✓r) 7h�sE !�1 �r ^�'°�''� �wuerS y�.i// R� OuvAC�07��N. A sketch of proposed property and structure e�ust be drawn and attached, showing the follaring: 1. North direction. 2. location of the proposed structure on the lot. 3. Dioensions of property, proposed structure, and fron and side setbacks. 4. Street names. 5. Locat{cn and use of adjacent existing buildings (withtn 350 feet). The uadersigned hereby declares that a11 the this applica ion are true and torrect. DATE � � y SI6NATURE� vp� f respres ntation stated in • �/(�YL� LEPHONE NO �7�— y� � �' ,S`i Z - 3'7 0� w/u�. MAILING LIST SP M84-18 Lewis Farr 157 River Edge Way second accessory building Mr. & Mrs. Richard Harris 6200 Riverview Terrace N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Gregory Potasek 310 62nd Way N.E. fridley, Mn 55432 Cicil C. 6ibson 19� 62nd Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Richard Jackson 180 62nd Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Byron Davis 170 62nd Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Stan Jakus 160 62nd Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Gordon Griebenow 160 Ri ve r Edge Way N. E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Richard Anderson 165 River Edge Way N.E. fridley, Mn 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Robert A. Latz 161 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Lewis L. Farr 157 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Mark Youngquiest 148 River Ed9e Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 5532 •• Mr. & Mrs. Joseph Maertens 144 River Edge Way N.E. fridlev, Mn 55A3� PLanning Comnissi Gerald J. Nugent 168 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 September 17,�984 Mr. & Mrs. Gerry W. Byzewski 164 Ri�r Edge Way N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Helen Mikuluk 129 River Edge Way N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 m Se-�te�1 er 10, 1984 ' nn V1't?' Of T'ri ('.lo^. ':iF t[?E L1.1(�fTG1�Y`P� � T�TOtlfrt'" O""_�(•7•�- •,f. . !�]. �1VP?' ':��-P ',-l�... ...`"(' l:�'1—E.. .. - _ _,� y,_",Vf `."nFI"`. t��':P }�1111C�17'.�" S1tf+ Of r+. rr0'�O°P� ,^.CC[„-•-CI-" ^+J.11f'i..,� �.�C�^.tP.(` 0?� tt.P llr0_)?it�' !lf "�T. �' "1-.� r,�...q,- -,.-r,,..� 1�'j a;ver t,..'8 ..i.^."' ::ri^ ^7'�' '_?, CO^._il pt(' .--.�rr.,�.._'�i, C:1ti"! t`1B COri•"tT'11Ct10� 0? t�^.1^ 1CC�'�•-�r-` -'��;�.'"_7,�^'. �� _� � 7 vl�� _ , ,_� � !/,'��,�� 4� 7� �� aZ� f . � . . � � I `r .. r 5 p , j� �"'��A ME� ,' � /'i . , ' '' 1 -�y „r . � , , LN? ' • • , 1 � r • , ,. , • i � - � � . , , , Pl}�K�� ' � . ' ' � �\ �, i'� c, � � 's � • � "' '•,,, { 1 . , yyo� � � , � y �: . � � E� ;'' • ` , � ' ` • ' `� � G � „ . • f;. . , � • • � -' • ��'i � � � � � " 'v � . • �• � •• � ,j � {y • � • •� � •� � ' .• � i1: �. � � , t� — � • •� �• \ - • A.,�`•.. � s� "�'°w'n�'��, cc�iN� 1 • � • � .s � LuMMO^ � •• .• � . . wnY '•�T�,A�f�,• :, M,SSissivv� ` ;.� �r �� ; , , , . � � � , �2 . ` ~, • �� M � � • • Y \ • i. � / �3 • •• � • �yZW � � _ � ',t •�� • � �, ba ; � ,� e � ! ; s � \ �.,1, 1� � � � '� 4 \�,� �V � ' , � fH Wpy : 3 N f , Y S� �� S1 6M� ►��! j� _a f�, � '-'i 1' � . .t u 1 �' 1 � � � �f � 1 1 � � � 1 ; �-: { .� �M� • s � pY � � } S . ► '6;� w . � . ' ' ' , ,, : w' ' � ��r^ " -._��'' :� _� .�' � j J�,•��r�' � � pTRIHI 1 l � ' � � � 6 PD WF� .� i .� � 4 � R, . t � .�'./ � f ;,t.� Y. ,�1��, S 5 1 i 1 � j � O � 1 3 p � I � � � • � t � ", �' �!' . ��'� • ir � 6 ' s i i 1 �5 � I 1 � 1 � / ' G i � � � 1 I ��,.o � �.�'t'�� . 1 / /L I� � � A e z � / ? f � I i 7 � in.�4w' ��M 1 3 ?° ,� I. 1 � � I l ��f ; � � � ! r . oras w � • � ,�, N = ; ..I..� '�'•', ' ' � � „ . � �. o � �, �. �; � , � � ,r� +f• � i P �/ �r 8 R � li E �• � ! � 11 A K iI ! EOQE ,_; ^ g , � , , ,� ' : AY � ,�h ,> H �� ,. z :� �r , w' y rl v.e�,. ti,1X � rlNr��i�`' �" —�� '1 . . • • • ` , ' 'I �� Y � � / 1 r t.� � � � '� `� � .� � . � RGd zo, , wpa15� ; 1�3 /?/ c,� � i+ tiJ �TEVENS�� i / { ' ` �,i�`�C�� . /� t� ' i ' cr+asE� � � . ��, a ,�. ., -- � IsLArvo aus[s �-, ., �•. � • • � �1 i �i � � � i (/O�� i � ..� . • � 1 � ('f1APL 5 ST 1 � i `�� '• � � / !! � � �c� � 3 0 ,�, 43� � � ,l�/, l• ,��`�'_ � � � � ♦. • � •�• ♦ �� ' 4 � � ♦ • �� • \• • • • • • ��l} ♦ ' � , . ♦ ,� I•I•.�..��'W4s��-e� �.1� �� i � -.: ;`, .�,;,- . � .� .. . , ; r ..r. _ ;, �•, � .• :y �e � ;.: •��, i,�� 4i. ,�"•,i _' �„� v „ `�.� � � .�� •., .:.t•.: F�?4'�'1 fh �. 4 , � ••L * i.� �:� � � ��,� +�". : . � a 0 � z � .. �; � •�',w, �t.'�t� � Y � �S'�' � �. , ,,�`�.1'•• • � '�� ' L^-- ��.'q . �� , � � 7` � .•` '' • S�, �,-``�'� � �.tr. : �. : . .. f �� j{ > > � .� f; ;{;t- J r ��! . 'j �.1 _ • f� �{. � t'^.�� Li, •s. . � �`� .�� {r f � T�' t' ♦ : ;�`. ; l , � �� `�; +� ...� r.,j�%�•. • ;. .t � � � �• ` � � •�' ?, ' �w' . �� ` �.,�� '� � <�..? • � .5 '�,,' +,� �. �. ' ` '.•.`itk, - :t � �c :31= , • „ fi� * . ?f' �.� � . . � � . � ��" . �" •�� . , �� • , .�� ti�•� • �:�� . ', lt �, - � _ •�, s �, � �• ,:�, . ; '�n R �. ; . 0", . r r;y,�y� yg•c, y,., ,;.. ..• iT-.'!- �. ♦ '` � : +� 7�+��f�' � ,i.�+ a. . � .� f�', �� ♦.� .�f •,r;' yp ♦ .w `rt T... ;� S� � . 'yr, . c�. Y , : ti $. � •� � , . '•u � �. 'r,' �� •,;`+� t �'�: -�%� �" 1 r • � �, +• � . ;`' g'�s�.+•.`<.�� .:% s �: -',�� , �, '��. r . . ,.�,y . ,�T� ,�.;� . 1 ` . i ' :r , '� . �C� � .. � . �. �` ,� f . . - � � • � � %r � . ,-r�,�; 6' �- �,��. � , ., ��, � ,� }, . i, . : ' - . . #ht # . .,,, � . " . � .i , , ; , �� . • s � {� . ., . � 'f ; ^ . -, . - r .•�� .r + :� - � j , V`•,�, y e' ��•t ' ,. , � _ :. ,: , �' � Y r ,. .� ,�Y r; ` �` . , / ', � ` �" >., , ��, � : i , ...: ,: , .� . ' .. � :. 1 ' `� �- � �Ttj ��y_- �r. F� • � .,�. "'6 : ,:. '� � • �� ;� i�= ►: � , , �� . . a. ��• 7�;t: �'.yi' �' . � `. � y 1.�• •'�it ' � � (.T . � . • I� `�t *, f�� ', � ' / • � � "r•' �. .�0��..� I� �/,, . �E . % ., -!� .+ •� _ _ .' �� • b' . , . y �' � . j � . .'�� F '/ r � �. �a � �. r�R` . � ; , '� ,, . � + `x� � ' Y . � � . � . ` t r.�_ � �i-.�..=.,,'/' f �� ! ��.' ^� � 7 �'� �. ��• . s • • �� '�� '�� , ` � �r � � - �)- -%�'' � � *t �: �; ��"• J � �Y �� .�f � . �'t '' ' . ��.: .— � � � � �_ _ _, _ .__ _� r.-�-� � . .�Jf �� oa� i � Q � � ` x / 3 � � � -`,.. � � � �Wr�� 3 � � ��, . 0; � -,� `�� ,.. e x \ � ` �� i � ;O\�. I / ; �. � , '� \ \ � � ', o ` �—.,� � �_ - v� �,w,J � � 1 ��i n e � F�1oP05ED C�t+��e � � � ��. � o _ � N � � �� J�� u crla ol 10~, M ��' J � M t0 X� � �--' _. . ,� �-- -� - � �� ._.. �, ; 1 � �J n , + � � � � ! GE ! X _to_--- - / � � _ - ` L � � � j� �� --- � I � � i i�� _ _� � , ; ��s-�- ,_ � {] � -� , �` � �� ' , , i � ( �� ; �/ ( � i i '� � , l ,% :�. _� � w �/r� �" �-s.."'�., -r �. / - �1.- 'RC., �t.-s ._3'�i .....' . .v , �"s.. '�1� ' t" '�` -. .. �. � _ e+►'rx_r.� �.. .. � ".a ��.---=-� � -- ="' tra°"'�� 0 �x � � �� '/ • / �� 840 i' � % % �� r•• �"r � r . i . . i , � ' '•� � � - �:.. . . ' • ..--:---� 1 '- , t -1 /� _ ,�. 'i �.� �°z' � �� ' �P 1 �t��f'�'��(' O� �U • ,-. . .,. _ . . -- ,.._ �. . ...,.�. . ....._ • . !' _ �.R WINDEN 3 �550�'aTES INC 2z �' �'T'� : r •.: - t . t • _ : is_ = a. _1L: � �o-��t�i –a'_'__'`_. .�lrww �t3i: . /1 ' , ,. . �-- -�---_- -----�.-`^r _ "' — _ _� ib �+},� - S"�R�Gc S}�e� Zp� � ��DAj � �� . ' 1 .� J . � I � " . r� N � � � i p W� � v ,� � zy_o _ i� -- _'� � • ''1 � — — � � 1 - - "! r r , : 1 " r� w�E nE�t:. ;�;• �. tti�• !,,,`. �5 • tRUE •�7 i:cac_; iE�aE:E•'•'�^♦ ;,;` ♦ S:c�-F• :.� '-: ��'`��i t� � �.t ��C •'.C.! C•f5;:.a:_ •�.." C' '�i �OL�' C�. Oi ♦.. lJ.,_.�.,G`_ ir •e� T��c��.�. ♦._: ►., r[�.Fit tr:t��—.�E�'� �f ♦nr iFpw po G'• Sa.� V1D Do�.o .ti.�_."�_Oo. el • 0 i�' C � h:n:Ltv i•:'_i::�'[5 �N: !i + . � . _ ..�- � . 5....0.0� M,nn�.o�o icp��+ro•.an ho 7710 CITV OF FiilO1.EY. �SU9JECT µ�1 LlNIVE�IS�TV PVE. Nt. FAIDIEV. MN. pgO.lL [B'1�1671-3060 /S� / G % ORDINANCE NO �7% � ZONING ACTION YACATION PLAT 23 ZOA A' SAY �' v� � y PS N PUBLISHED �/a PLANNING COhPIISSION: APPROVED DISAPPROVED UATE �%3 ' N0. CITY LOUNCIL: PUBLIC HEARING DATE 1ST REAO 2ND READ C1TY COUNCIL: APPROYED DISAPPROVED DATE NO PARK FEE REQUIRED: AI�qUNT PAID STIPULATIONS: ISd�� RECEIPT NO I �I � STREET LOCATION Of PROPERTY ' '� �'�'� �'�"'� LEGAL DESLRIPTION Of PROPERTY y �' I' � 77 �v � /.�c-G �C �' PRESENT ZONING LLASSIFICATION�-/ EXISTING USE OF PROPER7Y � ACREAGE OF PROPERTY DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROPOSED ZONING CLASSIFICATION OR TYPE OF USE AND IMPROVEMEN7 PR�POSED �'Y�'1�--� ,�-µ�-rn-m.-.� �--� >�.,Crt�-.�..-•-a G.�s.�c./ Nas the present applica�t previously sought to rezone, plat, obtain a lot split or variance or special use permit on the subject site or part of it? ___yes__�no. What was requested and when? The undersigned understands that: (a) A list of all residents and owners of proper- ty within 350 feet must be attached to this application (rezoning), 300 feet, (plat- ting), wjlJ be attached to"this bpplication. '(b) This application must be signed by all owners af the property, or an explanation given why t�is is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any defect in the proceedings resulting from the failure to list the names and addresss of all residents and property owenrs of propgrty in question, belongs to the undersigned. A sketch of proposed property and structure must be drawn and aYtached, showing the foltowing: 1. North direction. 2. Location of the proposed structure on the lot. 3. Dimensions of property, proposed structure, and fron and side setbacks. 4. Street names. 5. Location and use of adjacent existing burldings (within 350 feet). The undersi�ned hereby declares that all the facts and respresentations stated in this application are true and correct. OATE 9-�� -�y SIGNATURE ./��v �1��-�� ADDRESS /S'7/ �'.�f � �� is/ - TELEPHONE NO r �f.—o �'P� ��i-+�� .»�:.,»�,--.�• � LANE PLE.� i ' .:^� �s-, - , .. A T� ' ,,,� ,.es � rfr � '`c°° ! 1 . t�zo� �o � 30. .'O�'..+..M .�f1 .i! �i ,y t�;�' f„ , . �_.., ` �� W GZO �3e ►[�o /Gf0 7�b '� 4, a �� 1 bi2o � 1WO � �N L"• � � � i3 ( J[/s'IiVIf 'J � �iYM� / ..- j /., f V`� s � � � I� . � � ��--�'' � /0 . �� ! � �� ti � � S01 • ,�a� A 1 �� t��l �I$ �,b,�`✓� i37.�rS1r I361 /SL!'� `' r�� l6ei /�i3 �IL�I .�i � ��.r �+ l� ' ' /G�I ' ✓a�.e. 7. �."i1Rl��'�... ��.�tE ...�]r� ' �r..-�.. -�"---'i�i-�' rs�t�;., . /S20 ls;o� l540 �SSO �� •.°, - � .1 lL3; �e� 'o : ;;.� tGio fW �lib I(,�4 it; � � � �•i � � � � yT� r2 t t _ 1 1 � �o.o� � � Oi� , . n �... .I � .• � � : /r�• sA+b.r / �1 Gw�f . ✓�..r ' ��! .. i � 'N ° �rN. � � "' p 3 � � s f � r,o� 1 N �� ,K„s . _ � �(, � � s 6 �u �h� �" �, t . . , t� ` �° t �'� '+'x► rQ�'��7i*,�s„ ` ; w00DSI . ,�, 2`y , :` 4 �-..- �t�� u� � ti � - � i ,. r , .....__ , � �,; s rsr, ;,: ,c� �c1 c 7 0,� �� w0oD5�DE CT. i , ` � � � l ��/ ! 1 / (/� • .. : � , � ' i x.r� . �i �Y G1zfa L2�.1 � -R 1"'Iy o. � '`.y "i'4 �� ,f � I W ..% .. • .2l '--- -. ��e ; � ; �R ,. !.� �I) � . �, ,� p/�,/� � M Y � �rp� � \ I � ,• l�rr .Kf� r "'i � � CZT� ` l Q��I 6'ie� p `�� ; • � :i�f38R1AR ' � �w, �,{�� Zt0�2 �._;.. Q -"' , � �e. ' _.� �i'Jo .�,.1 .. � �.�: s21D AvE. � / y t� �r . �� W , � .�t �f�� o p ��+ �f,,L. � , ,,; 9 I e � �91i�1 a t : ��Q/ ��„'t � �L�� i .�, . ` / i I . Y7 /��,�, � • . 'IN � •'I' GI�O /lN. - � " z ' e° , ' t p : 6r� ��e � .�.�.,,: : i� [�. • w .� .v. �.. .v. � .Y � \ Z, �9'; . ��r70 . C� I ;� � ��• � �f}� ,iird . ,u,�,. " , � G,c � ,� � o � . ; � � ) c�sc � ��G � � PARR : 'J 6 S� .o. » � ��F . r t � �I �i � 'r �' � 1 O y �I� �� ' T7' Q5 � Q < 2 `� ! W � .s� : � � �'� �`''' • � .� ]� LI !o � i500 !S/0 .�ri .isr� `/�O Q , 1 � }. � t``n rara. � . � `7 -y��IG � '�` 0 7 � r�f? �5�� b uts m�a ic�� r�sr —� ' � � _ � �r ar � o r ,� � • t I6�� K* �6S � b i' ��I rr� . . . ir � ! E � RMER sEC. d! � . . ` . �, .r'i � .:�%� . � . �.t , ROiMND 1M. ANDERSON + �= % ...,:.:,.�. ' COtJNTI� SURVFYOR ' R«,.rx-Te ' 111� C�M1L ��-}�.s • � +'�`4 - . < � ��/l�f `___ � • t-.�/r �f ti iT �� w �:'.: d .� .g b 4 � T J 'y': 5S N bQ.-3 i: W z (�� ST_ .. AV � R_ NE , � -� 1 r �`. t .R :P•� ; .. ��'i� ii�;�'`, ''.',. �i i �: �'�� . Cl ."i•r. • � N � G s' 3r r o . r :^ � W� ; �b` �o s� v r N n e` � •�� n" :.� ri. 1 � - --- - a 0 za Sco1e ' l' � 100 . p��o�es I�o� Mo��n��':�� Besnngs Sno��n A�e Ass�mc,� tNA�ly Ani Dru�t+uge Eusem:.�ts .�1Y1'l�Vf� ��'1VS '. ��,� •�-( � a♦ � La+. a� � The W�.G1n Be�r.� n'. 1n.'�.��G CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY coH _ Pine_Tree Builders,_ Inc. _ ____ _ __.__..._ . o - 9 ' ' 7 ' - - - ' � - - - _ ° -Ui�l�+y E Drn�n- oye Easement �1 ST 2� oF F#.��1ENT �REMNN �N EFFEfs f�R CABiE T,V, � y�*� R�aN�Na 8 N AVE. NE o Denotes iron r.,onuc�ent F.' ': 1]'. ij �`_ J/; i.fi ::).(�:. Tc::rd _t.ior. Descriptior.� Lot 9, block 4, kICE CkE�n ESTAT�:S, Anoka Cour.ty, b:ir.nesota ( �oun t Cuunlry �u r� �c,�or' .. :•� �. � , _ E�: .. _ . _ _ _ .. �y . a . • . • �F.• . . '1�/� I n�.,..�� . 7n.�t :n; , i�� ..�� .... i�. . .� . . ^'. In� Ic::.nn r� .01 �L-a�N..�! r J.�.0 U�r.�.f, u �: Ji •t� �� e,. .. .�. .. i.. � �} ._n�. Ih..i-l: . :�ul a�: viiiLb .n:'..e•�Y�.: � . .. . ' . ,. . .. , . rl a.;.. . e;,. n. �i > . ?`��h --- -�:. _� __ 7une i:�S v . -- - � :...-.�.c.. -> 6s 2�..z..e . � 224 c,.� �..r. ' S S6 J �i - Northwestern Bell August 1). 1984 Mr. 7homas Shelton 1571 61 Ave. N. E. Fridley. Minnesota Dear Mr. Shelton; The Northwestern Bell Telephone Company ha:; reviewed your request to vacate the ten foot easement at the rear of your property. 1511-61 Avenue N. E. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company has no objection to this vacation. We have buried cable in the front of this tocation only, where it will be necessary to main- tain this cable in its present ]ocation. � � �� . a. v;o,et Enqineer-Distribution e � � Auguet 20, 1984 � Ms. Kathy Shel[on 1571 - 61a[ Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Subject: VACATING OF EASEtgNT Dear Me. Shelton, 2� NoAhern States Power Company North Divlslon 450t 6Btn Avenue Non� B�ooklyn Cente�, Mlnnesola 55429 Te�eD�ne (6t2) 556-9t20 Just a no[e to let you know [hat NSP vould not oppose [he vacation of the easement behind your home at 1571 - 61s[ qvenue N.E. - Fridley, MN. Our facili[iea are all underground on the fron[ lot lines, and ve do not anticipate nsing [he easement in question. We do have facili[ies in an easment behind 1549 - 61st Avenue N.E. and be[veen 1549 and 1559 - 61s[ Avenue N.E. that ve would no[ vaca[e. I hope this viil help you with your project. Sincerely, L �' �.Lni,p�v Larr � 1. Benson Staff Assistant North Divieion � � �� ►`�• i� r Auyust 20, 1984 Kathy Shslton 1571 blst Araiue 1� Prldley. ►OC 55432 RE: VaL'etion of Utility HasNent. Minnsgaseo has no gsa f�eiliti�s within that platted utility �asement over the rsar 30 feet of Lot 9, Block 4, Rice Creek Estatee. Anoka Crnmty, M.�I , and has no objection to the vacation or a�eroaehsent thereof. Sinesrely. j , ? �,C �G�Gu� L �c.��._ Nilliam R. Sehrts � A�inistrator-Real EsC�te ee: City of Fridley � „_ _ D.e•-�c�= __ _ -: .. _ _-. - _ _ 29 � ST�O R LE CammirmenJ lo E►�eNence d August 21, 1984 Mr. Thomas Shelton 1571 61st Avenue NE Fridley, NIN 55432 Dear Mr. Shelton: We have investigated your request to vacate a portion of a 10' utility and drainage easement located at the North end of your property. At the moment, Storer Cable has an underground cable located within 2' of the property line. It is our request that this cable remain a§}�oc�a�ed and Ghat 2' of the utility and drainage easement remairc k etfec� for future construction if necessary. The remaining 8' oP the easement may be vacated. If you have any questions, feel free to call me at 571-6206. Keith DS. Hennek System Plant Manager .- �"5�= '�. CITY OF FRIDLEY ENVIRONilENTAi QIIALITY CAMMISSION MEETI NG SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 CALL TO ORDER: lir. �ellan (Chairperson Nielsen arrived later) called tn order the September 18, 1984, Environmental Quality Commission meeting at 7:41 p.m. ROLL CALL• Members Present: Maynard Nielsen, Tom Gronlund, Richard Svanda, Wayne Wellan, Bruce Peterson Others Present: Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator JoAnn Nelson, Representative from Recyling IInlimited Brent Nelsott� Editor of The New Recyclist APPROVAL OF AIIGIIST 21. 1984. EFn1IRONMENTAL QUALITY CONIMISSION MIN[JTES: MOTION BY MR. GRONLUND� SECONDED BY MR. PETERSON� TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 1�84� ENVIROPtMENTAL QBALITY COMMISSION MINUTES APPROVED AS WRITTEN. IIPON p VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, MR. WELLAN 4ECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 1. GIIEST SPEAKER - JOANN NELSON REPRESENTATIVE FRO�' RECYCLING UNLIMITED. Ms. Nelson began by giving the commission background on Recycling IInlimited. She explained that it started as a small recycling project in their backyard in 1969. They had help Yrom volunteers �students, church groups, etc.). As the project grex, they moved to Midway Stad3um. They started a gilot curbside pick-up program in 19'78 in St. Paul. It started on a once a week pick up basis and went to once a month and has beea that way ever since. Recycling IInlimited is a non-profit organization which makes it eli- gible Yor grants xhich they use for employing the hard to employ and edpcation. It is nox doing curbside pick up service in the following communities: St. P�1� Lauderdale, Falcon Heights, New Brighton, St. Anthony� North St. Paul, } of Rosevile, -} of Naplewood, 1/3 of Richfield, 1/5 of Minneapolie and has drop oPfs in various counties. It also publishes its or►a nexspaper, ��The New Recyclist", �rhich is distributed extensively in the Txin Cities and also subscribed to in 50 other etates. ENIiIRONMENTAL QIIALITY COMMISSION MEETING. SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 PAGE 2 . Ms. Nelson opened the discussioa to questions from the commissioners. Mr. Robinson asked if the cities noW using the program have independent haulers. Ms. Nelson stated that they all have independent haulers in Ramsey County. Mr. Robinson asked about how Recycling IInlimited gets started in a community. Ms. Nelson stated that everyone is different. In Minneapolis, they pay �22.00/ton and they do all the a@vertising. In Richfie2d, Lhey pay a flat fee and do their own publicity. Mr. Svanda stated that a lot of the sucCesses he has heard of are where the city has a contract with a hauler or the city does it themselves. Ms. Nelson stated it depends on xhat you want out of a program. She stated that they are the only recycling program that has been able to stay in the black with the recent economic hard times and to keep expanding. The grants that they have received have been applied to education� employment aad publicity. They are getting no subsidy at this time from St. Paul and Ramsey County. Mr. Wellan asked why their program is not being used by every city. Ms. Nelson stated that a lot of the money is used for other things other than the actual service. For example, St. Louis Park spent $200,000 on containers phen Recycling Unlimited, with a facility, could have used the money to do curbside pick up in the greater majority of Hennepin County. Mr. Wellan asked how much up front money xould be needed for a city like Fridley. Ms. Nelson stated that the 85,000 from the 50¢ surcharge money xould be sufficient. Richfield (1/3 is being picked up which amounts to 1�500-2,000 people) is now paying $100 a month. St. Louis Park is now paying E3,000 a month (20¢ a stop and 5 days a month). . ENVIRONMENTAL OALITY CONMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 PAG� Ms. Nelson stated that Fridley would be divided up in 2 days for pick up. Mr. YVellan asked at xhat participation rate it xould be profitable for Recycling IInlimited. l4,s. Nelson stated that a 30-q0% P�'ticipation rate is acceptable. Ms• Nelson asked if the city would be rilling to do the publicity. The following saB6estions were made: A. Newspaper coverage. B. Brochure to every household - signed by mayor or councilmembers. C. Ribbon cutting ceremony. Ms. Nelson stated that they could come for the 85,000 surcharge money if the city xould do the advertising. Mr. Nelson stated that the "The New Recycllst" could be used as an advertising tool. N:r. Robinson asked if the best way to start Ras on a limited basis. Ms. Nelson would like to do it all at once and felt that from her experience a pilot program was not cost effective. Mr. Svanda asked what happens if the program does not work. Ms. Nel&on said that she hoped they would try harder to seil it. Mr. Petereon asked how they have dealt rith a situation where there is an independent hauler and no monetary incentive for residents. Ms. Nelson stated that she does not hear that any more because people are more aware and concerned about landfills and water contam- ination. She also said that people become smarter consumers when they start recycling. Mr. Peterson said that that could be something put into publicity that there is more to be gained in the flxture by recycling. Mr. Svanda asked if Recycling IInlimited recycled plastics. Hs. 13elson said that they don�t as there is no economically feasible xay to process them and the markets have not been that good. ENVIRONMEI'�R'AL @IIALITY COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 PAGE 4 ?fr. Gronlund asked if Ms. Nelson thought a survey waild be a good idea• Ms. Nelson said that surveys are alright if you oould get interns to coordinate them because you most often don�t get them returned. Mr„ Wellan asked how long it xould take for a city like Fridley to hit the 30-40% P�'ticipation mark. Ms. Nelson stated that it should not take more than tvo pick ups. (Fublicity plays a large role.) Mr. Wellan asked if Ms. Nelson had any numbers on what it cost to launch a publicity progran. Ms. Nelson stated that some communiiies have gotten grants. St. Louis Park got 816,000 and Richfield got $10,000. The commissionerF discussed finding funds from Anoka County, Metro- politan Council� and Block Grant money. Mr. Wellan asked Ms. Nelsoa what their new facility would allow them to do. Ms. Nelson stated that the glass could be put through a crusher that will take caps, rings� etc. so more volume can be done. Mr. Robinson asked if Recyclin� IInlimited coordinated their own phone calls for missed stope. Ms. Nelson stated that they have radios in their trncks. Mr. Gronlund asked how many total employees Recycling Unlimited had. Ms. Nelson said about 20. They have also started a facility in Duluth. Mr. Peterson asked xhat requirements there were of the participants. Ns. Nelson stated the main thing is that the containers are clean. The labels do not have to be taken off. Mr. Svanda asked how this program would be compatible with SORT. Mr. Nelson stated that based on their past experience, SORT would get more material because everyone xould be more aware of recycling and if they miss their day they could use the drop off site. - ENVIRONMENTAL UALITY COMMISSIOI3 MEETING. SEPTEMBER 18, 1964 PAGE 5 Mr. Peterson asked if there would be a conflict in sorking xith SORT. Ms. Nelsoa stated that they alvays work with groups. Mr. Wellan asked what procedure rould be best to present it to the community. Ms. Nelson stated the folloxing items were needed: A. A basic contract Fhich could be yearly, every 2 years, or on-going. (Ms. Nelson xill send a copy to l�tr. Robinson.) B. An insurance cerLificate from Recqcling Unlim3ted. C. The type of financial arrangement. D. Tons picked up. E. Make sure workmanship is properly done. Mr. Robinson asked if there was a better time of the year to start the program. Ms. Nelson stated that she really didn't think so. She said the main thing �rould be a good month of publicity. The committee discussed possible avenues of advertising such as cable TV, local newspaper� city newsletter, Minneapolis paper, water bills, etc. Ms. Nelson stated they would work rith Anoka County employment programs. It was decided that Mr. Robinson would check on finding the funding sources for the program and checking with Richfield on their publicity program. Mr. Robinson asked Ms. Nelson to drait a preliminary proposal in the form of a letter. Ms. Nelsoa stated they are 3ntereated in leasing a new processing cettter xhich has 18,QQ0 square feet. Ms. Nelson asked rrhen the commission would be interested in starting the program. The commiesioners felt that it would be the first oi the year before all different aspects of the program could be set in motion. ENVIRONMENTAL QDALITY COMMISSION MEETING. SEPTENBER 18, 1984 PAGE 6 2. Mr. Robinson stated that he would send a map to Ms. Nelson for use in making up the proposal. Recycling IInlimited will pick up multi- family residents. The commission decided to look into Recycling Unlimlted as an eligible program. 3. OTfIER BIISINESS A. LETTER FRQM FTiC REGARDING FRIDLEY ORDINANCE N0. 801 - HAZARDOUS WASTE CONTROL. The commission decided to turn the matter o�er to the city attorney for his consideration. B. ANOKA COUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR LICENSE APPLICATION INFC7 RMATIO N Mr. Robinson called to the commission�s attention to the form used by Anoka County. ADJOIIRNMENT: MOTION by Mr. Peterson� seconded by Mr. Nielsen, to adjourn the meeting, IIpon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Nielsen declared the September 18, 1984, Environmental Quality Commission meeting adjourned at 9:37 P.m. Respectflilly submitted, � �� Denise Boscb Recording Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING; OCTOBER 3 1984 PAGE 2 Mr. Robinson stated the plan as proposed would have the building located 95 ft. back from East River Road and 35 ft, from 6ist. There will be 27 parking spaces which is adquate, and there will be green space to buffer the building from 6oth the north and tfie west. Mr. Robinson stated the lots to the immediate north are R-1 but are slated to be rezoned to R-3. That is tfie location for the Loft Homes. There is more light industrial to the south, Stevenson School to the west, and single family homes in other adjacent areas. Mr. Robinson stated tfie plan seemed to meet all code requirements, but Staff would recommend the foilowing stipulations: 1. The petitioner provide a survey of the property 2. There be a 10 ft, bikeway/walkway easement a7ong the northern portion of the property, consistent with the bikeway/walkway plan which will tie into the County's regional trail system 3. An approved drainage plan 4. An approved landscape plan Ms. Schnabel asked the petitioner, Mr. Perlick, if he had any comments regard- ing this request. Mr. Perlick stated fiis business was currently located in Spring Lake Park away from the freeway system. This property was an ideal location for their huilding and t�eir type of business, because it will give them easy access to the freeways and downtown areas. Their business is strictly a professional business--a computer software and hardware engineering company, They do build and design computers, bui they do not do any manufacturing. He stated 50% of their staff (around 20 emp7oyees) are never in the office; they are usually at customer sites, so the need for 27 parking spaces will probably never arise. He stated there are very few visitors to the building. They feel tfiey would provide a nice 6uffer zone between the proposed housing (Loft Homesj and any other light industry. Ms, Gabel asked if they would rent out any portion of the building, Mr. Perlick stated the building would De exclusiveTy for their business. Mr. Kondrick asked if Mr. Perlick fiad any problem with the stipulations out- lined by Staff. Mr, Perlick stated he had no objection to any of the stipulations. Mr. Bert STater, 128 River Edge Way, stated he did not mean to detract from this particular rezoning request, but he wondered if the Commission was aware that property was acquired from some of their properties some years ago to build a pathway to aTlow children access to Stevenson School, with the definite stipulation that no bikeways would come through there. If the PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING; OCTOBER 3 1984 PAGE 3 bikeway which is proposed is coming as close as this pathway as it sounds like it is, what was to prevent people traveling on bikes desiring to go north,to not go across East River Road, but to start using the pathway? �hen this biNeway system was built, he could see ihat pathway turning into a biKeway/�alkway. He stated that fon that reason the neighbors are very cancerned about these bikeway/walkways, Mr, Kondrick stated he was chairperson of the Parks & Recreation Commission. He stated he appreciated Mr, 5later`s and the neighbors' concerns, and he �ould recommend that they conta�t Dr, Cfiarles Boudreau, Director of the Parks & Recreation Department, regarding these concerns. Ms. Schnabe] stated this was a very valid concern, and she thanked Mr. Slater for bringing it to the Commission's attention. Mr. Lewis Farr, 157 River Edge Way, stated fie would like to speak in favor of the building. He thought it was a very nice thing to haue in this area and would certainly enhance the area. The lot has been vacant too long, and the building would be a 6ig plus for the City of Fridley. MOTION SY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO CLOSE SFiE PUBLIC HEARING ON ZOR il84^04 BY LARRY PERLSCK. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CIASED AT 8:00 P.M. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. MINTON, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF REZONING REQUEST, ZOA H84-04, BY LARRY PERLICK� � REZONE FROP1 M-1 (LIGHT INDU5TRIAL) TO C-I2I (GENERAL OFFICE) THE NORTHERLY 255 FT, OF LOT 9, AUDZTOR'S SUBDIVISION N0.�78, TO ALLOW THE CON5TRUCTION OF A PXOFESSIONAL BUILD£NG, THE SAME BEING 6095 EAST RIVER ROAD N.E., WITH THE FOLLOWING 5TIPULATIONS: I. TNE PETITIONER PROVIDE A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY 2. THERE BE A IO FT. BTKEWRY/WALKWAY EASEMENT ALONG THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. 3, AN RppgpVED DRAINAGE PLAN 4. AN APpROVEb LANDSCAPE PLRN Ms. Gabe7 stated she thought this was a very appropriate plan, and she would much rather see this land down-zoned in terms of the R-1 property farther down and for the sake of the Loft Homes tf�at are going in there. This will create a much more pleasant environment to live in than if it were to go industrial. The Commissioners agreed with Ms. Gabel. UPON A VOICE VOTE� RLL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION GARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, OCTOBER 3, 1984 PAGE 4 2. LOT SPLIT REQUEST, t:S. #84-09, BURLINGTON NORTHERN: Split off the ort erly 55 t, of Lot 9, Au itor s Sub ivision No. 78 to make a new building site at 6095 East River Road. Mr, Robinson stated the proposal was to split off the northerly 155 ft, of Lot 9. Ne siated 30 ft, of tfie most northerly portion is roadway easement so the lot size is actually 125 ft, in width. Mr. Robinson stated the only staff recommendation was that this lot split be registered at the County. T6is should be done before October 15. How- ever the lot split wi17 not be approved by the City Council by that time. ke recommended Mr. Perlick contact the County to get a clarification as to how thi:s could be done. Mr. Robinson stated the park fee agreement has already been signed. Mr. Rob Taylor stated he was representing Burlington Northern. He agreed with Ms. Gabel that this building would 6e an improvement and would upgrade the area. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST, TO RECOAPMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF IAS SPLIT REQUES2,�L.S.�-N84-09, BY BURLINGTON 1��RT�ERN TO SPLIT OFF THE NORTfIERLY 155 FT. OF IAT 9, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISSON N0. 78 TO MAKE A NEW BUILDING SITE AT 6095 EAST RIVER ROAD, WITH THE STIPULATION THAS THE LOT SPLIT BE RECORDED WSTH THE COUNTY PRIOR TO THE IS5UANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT, � UPON A VOICE VOTE� AI,L VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNRNIMOUSLY. � MOTSON BY MR. MINTON� SECONDED BY MR.�SABA� TO RECOMMEND SHAT THE LAT SPLIT REQ77EST BE HELD UNTIL THE CITY COUNCIL HAS THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE REZONING REQUEST ON NOVEMBER 5� SO THAT BOTH THE LOT SPLIT REQUE5T AND THE REZONING REQUEST CAN BE HANDLED AT THE SAME TIME. UPOh A VDICE POSE, ALL I�OTING AYE, CHAIRWOMRN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOU5LY. 3, PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATIOP! OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #84-18, BY : er �ectlon 05.0 ,, 3, , of t e Fri ley City Co e, to a ow t e construction of a second accessory building, a 20 ft, by 30 ft. structure to be used for a workshop on Lot 10, Block 1, River Edge Addition, the same being 157 River Edge Way N.E. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SP i184-I8 BY LEWIS FARR, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTTNG AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARE'D THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:.25 P,M. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, OCTOBER 3 1984 PAGE 5 Mr, Robinson stated the proposal was for a 20 ft, by 30 ft. second accessory building to be used as a workshop. This structure would be located in the rear �f the yard and would be attached to an existing shed-type building, The property is in the critical area and, as such, all new buildings have to be set back 40 ft. from the bluff line. This stipulation was enacted as part of an ordinance to preserve the view of the area. This building is set back a-m7nimum of 60 feet. Mr, Robinson stated Staff has no problem with this special use permit requPSt; therefore, there were no stipu7ations at this time. Mr, Kondrick stated one thing the Commission was always concerned aboui was noise. He asked Mr. Farr what type of equipment would be used in this bui7din9, Mr. Farr s�ated it would be basicaily woodworking equipment. Right now he does his woodworking in the basement of his house. He has limited space in the basement and has only a 1z car garage. The woodworking is strictly a hobby. He stated he has lived in ktis home since 1958 and certainly did not want to do anything that would detract from the area. He would not put in anything that was obnoxious to the neighborhood, Ms. Heien Mikulak, i29 River Edge Way, stated she was opposed to the con- struction of this building. She stated that if Mr. Farr gets this special use permit, then there would be half a dozen other people in the neighborhood who would be making requests for other buildings. She stated Mr. Farr will be using saws whic� wi71 create noise. She stated a hobby usually tarns into a full-time job at home, and the neighbors will be listening to the noise all day long. Mr, Farr stated he does woodworking in his garage right now, and he has never had a complaint about noise from his neighbors. As far as noise, there are pienty of other noises around the neighborhood when people are doing things outside. He stated this building wil] be basically a closed shop. The building will have 6 inch walls so it will be insulated very well. The building will be located to the northwest end of the iot so he did not see noise as ever being a prob�em. Ms, Schnabel s�ated that as far as a home occupation, the City does not per- mit a business to be operated in the home, except by request to the City. Lf at any time, Mr. Farr would decide to turn this into a home occupation, he would have to make a request to the City. When people do request permits to build second accessory buildings, the Commission is always very careful to make sure there is not a business going into that building. The Commission tries very hard to preserve the neighborhood concept within the neighborhoods. Ms. Schnabel stated she wanted to point out that the Commission had received a letter from the two property owners adjoining Mr. Farr's property, Mr. & h1rs. Cecil Gibson, 190 - 62nd Way, and Ms. Margaret Latz, 161 River Edge Way. Both property owners stated they were in complete agreement with the construction of the building. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 3 1984 PAGE 6 Mr. Olga Pragal, When Mr. Far puts home, because who nearby? 152 River Edge Way, stated she was opposed to this building. in this building, they wi11 not be abie to sell their is going to want to buy a house with a woodworking shop Mr. Farr stated that if he could expand his garage, he would do so, but this way he was moving his shop farther away from the neighbors. He failed to see the prob7ems expressed by the neighbors. MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY MR. NIELSEN� TO CLO5E TH8 PUBLIC XEARSNG ON SP �84-18 BY LEWIS L. FARR. UPON A i/OICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECF.A.RED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:36 P.M. Mr, Kondrick stated he appreciated the neighbors' concerns regarding noise, but he did not believe noise was going to be a problem. The building would be far enough away and the building would be too well insulated to create a noise problem. Mr. Saba stated that since there were concerns expressed by the neighbors, maybe one of the stipulations on the special use permit should be that Staff review the speciaT use permit in two years to ensure the petitioner was concurring with the intent of the permit. MOTSON BY MR. KONDKICK, SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #84-18, BY LEWIS L, FARR, PER SECTION 205,07.Z, 3, A, OF THE FRZDLEY CZTY CODE, TO ALLOW THE CON5TRUCTION OF A SECOND ACCESSORY BUILDING, A 20 FT, BY 30 FT. STRUCTURE TO BE USED FOR A WORK5HOP ON LOS 10, BIACK 1, RIVER EDGE ADDITION, THE SAME BEING I57 RIVER EIJGE WAY N.E.� WITH THE STIPULATION THAT STAFF REVIEW THIS SPECSAL USE PERMIT IN TWO YEARS. Ms. Schnabel stated she appreciated the concerns expressed by the neighbors; however, she felt this was going to be removed even farther from the neighbors than the existing use of the property so that the noise level should not be there. If there should be a problem, the City does have ordinances that can deal with the problem. It is a matter of making use of the City's faci- lities and going through the proper channels to make the complaints. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CNAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRISD UNANIMOUSLY, Ms. Schnabel stated this special use permit request would go to City Council on October 15. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, OCTOBER 3 1984 PAGE 7 4. � reet or tne North iu toot utti,ty easement on �ot Estates, to make a pool location and retaining wall same being 1571 61st Avenue b.E. • Vacate the Southerly �9, Block 4, Rice Creek in code compiiance, the Mr. Robinson stated this property was located on 61st Avenue and Benjamin St. adjacent to Benjamin/Briardale Park. The petitioners wish to vacate the 10 ft, utility and drainage easement along the back side of their property. He stated Northwestern Beli, Minnegasco, NSP, and Storer Cable have been notified of this vacation request. He stated Northwestern Bell, Plinnegasco, and NSP have no objections to the vacation. Storer Cable has an underground ca61e located within 2 ft, of the property line. Storer has requested that this cable remain as located and that 2 ft, of the utility and drainage ease- ment remain in effect for future construction if necessary. The remaining 8 ft, may be vacated. The petitioner, Mr, Thomas Shelton, stated he had no objection to this stipulation. MOTION BY MR. MINTON� 5ECONDED BY 1�Z. SABA� TO.RECOMMEND TD CISY COUNCZL APPROVAL OF VACATION REQUE5T� SRV H84-04� BY THOMAS AND KATHY SHELTON, TO VRCATE THE 50USHERLY 8 FEET OF THE NORTH ZO FOOT UTSLITY EASEMENT ON LOT 9� BIACK 4, RICE CREEK ESTATES, TO MAKE A POOL IACATION AP7D RETAINING WALL IN CODE CbMPLIANCE� THE SAME BEING 2572 6ZSS AVENUE N,E., WITFI THE STIPULATION SHAT A 2 FT UTILITY EASEMENT BE MAINSAINED FOR STORER CABLE. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � Ms. Schnabel stated this would go to City Council on Nov. 5. 5. RECEIVE SEPTEMBER 18, 1984, ENVIRONMENTAC QUALITY COMMISSIOM MINUTES: MOTIQN BY MR. NIELSEN, SECONDED BY M5. GABEL� SO RECEIVE THE SEpT. 18, I984, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES, Mr. Nielsen stated the Comnission had a guest speaker, Ms. JoAnn Nelson, from Recycling Unl:imited, who spoke about starting curb-side recycling programs in communities. Mr. Nielsen stated he would like the Planning Commission and the City Council to know that the Environmental Qeality Commission has worked very hard in trying to �,et a curb-side recycling program going in Fridley. At the Sept. City Council meeting, a member of another organization stated their organi- zation had studied the possibility of 9etting a curb-side recycling program going with no mention of the Environmental Quality Commission's efforts. He stated that as far as he was concerned,he would like to see a curb-side recycling program get started as soon as the City receives funding. � 4 � i PLANNIMG COMMISSION MEETIN6. OCTOBER 3, 1984 PAGE 8 Mr. Robinson stated that JoAnn Nelson of Recycling Unlimited would be willing to come into the City and start a curb-side recycling program for $5,0o� (from the 50�/household surcharoe fee the City is entitled to), so there would be tittle cost to the City. Recycling Unlimited is a�amily- run organization that employs people such as the handicapped to do cur6-side recycling, Pick-up would be on a once a month basis. Mr. Nielsen stated the curb-side recycling program would work in conjunction witfi SORT, and it would not put SORT out of business. Mr. Robinson stated that Ms. Nelson had stated that when Recycling Unlimited comes into a city where there is an existing satellite-type recycling center, that facility has usually done better because people are more aware of recycling. If people miss their recycling day, they will usually bring tfieir recycled materials to the recycling center rather than throw the materials out. Mr. Robinson stated the only thing Ms. Nelson requested was that the City do the publicity for the program. He stated Connie Metcalf would be going before the City Council regarding this recycling on October 29th. The Environmental Quality Comnission suggested that Ms. Nelson of Recyling Un- limited also be allowed to present her proposal at that time. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CNAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRZED UNANIMOUSLY, 6. OTHER BUSINESS: a. Lot Splits and Variances Pts. Gabel stated that at the last meeting, the question has again arisen as to whether the Planning Comnission should hear lot splits before the Appeals Comnission hears variances when the variances are related to the same property. She stated she felt a lot split appropriately came first If a petitioner does not get the lot split, then the petitioner does not need to apply for a variance, because the lot split causes the variance. So, she thought the lot split should come 6efore Planning before a variance goes before the Appeals Comnission. That seemed to be the proper sequence. Mr, Oquist stated that seemed to be a reasonable argument, but he could give the argument that if the Appeals Comnission does not grant the variance, why bother with the lot split? Mr. Saba stated that the lot split should be contingent on the approval of the variance. Ms. Gabel stated that is the way the Planning Comnission has done it in the past. The Planning Commission has heard the lot split first, and then made it contingent upon approval of the variance(s) by the Appeals Cormii s s i on, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 3 1984 PAGE 8 Mr. Robinson stated that JoAnn Nelson of Recycling Unlimited would be willing to come into the City and start a curb-side recycling program for $5,000 (from the 50¢/household surcharae fee the City is entitled to), so there would be little cost to the City. Recycling Unlimited is a family- run organization that employs people such as the handicapped to do cur6-side recycling. Pick-up would be on a once a month basis. Mr. Nielsen stated the curb-side recycling program would work in conjunction with SORT, and ii would not put SORT out of business. Mr. Robinson stated that Ms. Nelson had stated that when Recycling Unlimited comes into a city where tfiere is an existing satellite-type recycling center, that facility has usually done better because people are more aware of recycling. If people miss their recycling day, they will usually bring t�eir eecycled materials to the recycling center �ather than throw the �aterials out. Mr. Robinson stated the only thing Ms. Nelson requested was that the City do the publicity for the program. He stated Connie Metcalf would be going before the City Council regarding this recycling on October 29th. The Environmental Quality Corrmission suggested that Ms. Nelson of Recyling Un- limited also be allowed to present her proposal at that time. UPON A VOICS VOT6� dLL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOHAN SCHNABEL DSCLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIlfOU5LY. 6. OTHER BUSINESS: a. Lot Splits and Variances Ms. Gabel stated that at the last meeting, the question has again arisen as to whether the Planning Commission should hear lot splits before the Appeals Commission hears variances when the variances are related to the same property. She stated she felt a lot split appropriately came first. If a petitioner does not get the lot split, then the petitioner does not need to apply for a variance, because the lot split causes the variance. So, she thought the lot split should come before Ptanning before a variance goes before the Appeals Comnission. That seemed to be the proper sequence. Mr. Oquist stated that seemed to be a reasonable argument, but he could give the argument that if the Appeals Comnission does not grant the variance, why bother with the lot split? Mr. Saba stated that the lot split should be contingent on the approval of the variance. Ms. Gabel stated that is the way the Planning Commission has done it in the past. The Planning Commission has heard the lot split first, and then made it contingent upon approval of the variance(s) by the Appeals Commission. 1` PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, OCTOBER 3 1984 PAGE 9 Ms. Schnabel stated maybe the Planning Commission should establish a policy that in the future, the Planning Commission would handle a lot split in that manner. The Commissioners agreed that in the future, they would hear lot splits regardless of whether there was a need for a variance and have the lot split contingent upon approval of the variance, if needed, by the Appeals Commission. b. City Code Compliance Ms. Schnabel stated Mr. Scott Holmer of The Lift Ski Shop made some comments at the last meeting regarding landscaping that, in some ways, were very valid. Mr. Holmer had made the comment that why should he be required to screen his parking lot when the City liquor parking store parking lot next door was not screened. Ms. Schnabe] stated she felt very strongly that the City has to set the example. When there are city properties that are not in code compliance, the City should bring those properties into code so that members of the public cannot point a finger at the City. The City has got to be the leader in the whole city beautification project. Ms. Schnabel stated another good example was the city bu7letin board at the north end of the City on Highway #47. The billboard is very tacky and in need of repair. Again, if the City wants people to do things, the City has to get its act together. The City cannot deal from a position of strength to enforce code compliance when it is out of code compliance in a couple of areas. She felt this had to be a priority of the City's. Ms. Schnabel stated that af�er the City corrected its problems, the next responsibility of the City is to go to the County, another govern- mental body, and tell the county that people are complaining about its property. -She was referring to the Fridley Li6rary which has its dumpster unscreened. The Planning Commission members agreed with Ms. Schnabe7, MOTION BY MR. MINTON� SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION FINDS IT DIFFICULT 2t7 ASK CITIZENS TO COMPLY WITH CITY CODE' REQUIREMENTS WHEN THE CITY� COUN11'Y� AND SCHOOLS ARE IN NEGLECT OF CODE COMPLIANCE. THE PLANNING COMMISSION WOULD STRONGLY ENCOURAGE TKE CITY COUNCIL TO ENCOURAGE ALL LOCAL GOVEF7NMENT5� INCLUDING THE COUNTY AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS, TO COME INTO CODE COMPLIANCE. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOT70N CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PLANNING COMMISSIO� MEETING OCTOBER 3 1984 PAGE 10 c. New Chapter 126 entitled "Houses of Prostitution: Public Nuisance" Mr. Robinson stated the Commissioners had received copies of this ordinance at the meeting, The Planning Commissian shouid review the ordinance for discussion at the Oct. U Planning Commission meeting. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. KONDRSCX� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A vOICE VOTE��ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE OCT. 3� 1984� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:40 P.M. Respectfully su mitted, tiK.e. -G� Lyn Sa a Recording Secretary ti 1 :; � �Gm"'Z"a�.'.� ��'Z`'G-�'C/ ��"�''�'�'�'�`�' �� r �� .��1�uo � �� ;��a.�. � �� f�� Oc��`� �:-�"/�� C7_�� < �/� ��- _� . 1��.-��y� �'� 1�� / s� �� . � �yo� �7-� �� 'G� �f� ��L�� d � �J� /� � /�.��ati � 1r/� ,s�j �is,� �� '�