PL 05/23/1984 - 30620�,
f ,
i
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 23, 1984
CALL TO ORDER•
Chairwoman Schnabel called the May 23. 1984, Planning Conmission meeting to
order at 7:32 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Ms. Schnabel. Mr. Oquist, Ms. Gabel, Mr. Nielson,
Mr. Kondrick� Mr. Saba
Mer�ibers Absent: Mr. Minton
Others Present: Jim Robinson, Planning Specialist
Gordon Christenson, Redeemer Lutheran Church
Greg Shuster� Station 19 Architects
Richard Green, 901 132nd Lane N.E.� Blaine
John Hitchcock, 905 91tf� Lane N.E., Blaine
Annette Poeschel, i441 73rd Ave. N.E.
Gladys Sorum, 411 Mississippi St. N.E.
Brenda & Clinton Tibbetts, 421 Mississippi St. N.E.
Nels Johnson, 6456 Riverview Terrace
�
APPROVAL OF MAY 9, 1984, PLANNING COr4MISSION MINUTES:
MO_ TION BY MR. KONDRICIC� SECONDED BY !!R. SABA� TO APPROVE THE 1NAY 9� Z984,
planning commi.ssion minutes. �
Mr. Saba stated that on page 16, paragraph 5. last line, "CR-1" should be
changed to "R-3".
UPON A VOSCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CXAZRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED THE MINUTES
APPROVED AS AMENDED.
Ms. Schnabel stated that since one of the Planning Commission members had to
leave the meeting early and since all the member comnission had selected their
officers for 1984-85, the Planning Commission should hold their election now
for vice-chairperson.
1. ELECTION OF VICE CHAIRPERSON OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR 1984=85:
Chairwoman Schnabel declared the nominations open for vice-chairperson.
1�OTrON By l�R. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL, TO NOMINATE LERDY OQUIST
FOR VICE-CAAIRPERSON.
,r"� Hearing no other nominations, Chairwoman Schnabel declared the
nominations closed.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 23, 1984 PAGE 2 ^
i� 1
MOTION BY MS. GRBEL, SECGINDED BY 1�2. SABA� TO CAST A UNANIMOUS BALLOT FOR
LEROY OQUIST FOR VICE-CHAIRPERSON OF TXE PLANNING COJHMISSION FOR 1984-85.
UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOIHAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TXE MOTION
CARRIED f7NANIMOUSLY.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #84-08
EDEEMER LUTHER N CHURCH: Per Sect�on 05.0 .1, , B, to a low the
a�tion o a new e owship hall and remodeling for the handicapped,
on Lot 2, Block 6, Edgewater Gardens, the same being 61 Mississippi Way N.E.
MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY 1�IIt. KONDRICK� TD OPEN TXE PUBLIC XEARING
ON SP �184-08 BY REDEEI�R LiITHERAN CXURCX.
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CNAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY.
Mr. Robinson stated Redeemer Lutheran Church was located on Mississippi
just east of Hickory St. It was a combination church and school. It was
surrounded by R-1 properties except for a city park on the east. He stated
Redeemer Lutheran Church was proposing a multi-use facility which would be
added on to the west of the existing facility. It would involve the removal
of a portion of the existing structure. It also called for the removal of �
approximately 16 parking stalls.
Mr. Robinson stated Staff had the following concerns:
1. There be an approved landscape plan (Redeemer Lutheran Church has
agreed to do landscaping.)
2. The finish of the new building be compatible with the existing building
(which is brick) and in harmony with the residential character of the
neighborhood.
3. Special use permit subject to approval of Rice Creek Watershed District
and City Engineering requirements (Redeemer Lutheran Church is in the
process of getting Rice Creek Watershed District approval.)
4. Assurance that prograrrming of activities will not create adcled parking
demands which would cause an on-street parking problem. (He believed
this problem had been rectified by a change in programning)
Mr. Robinson stated Redeemer Lutheran Church has 259 existing parking stalls
and they will be removing 16 stalls. By city code, they would require
approx. 200 stalls. So, by code, Redeemer Lutheran Church has an abundance
of parking.
Mr. Greg Shuster, Station 19 Architects, stated he has been working with
Redeemer Lutheran Church on this project for several years. He stated �
Mr. Robinson had summed up the project very well. He stated the church _
started out with a wood-frame chapel. A sub-grade, partially below grade
addition, was added on to the original chapel in 1952. That was followed
,�'��
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 23. 1984 PAGE 3
by a sanctuary addition in 1959 and finally a two-story education addition
in 1963. Presently, there are four levels within the existing structure.
There is an upper and lower leve] through the sanctuary, and the rest of
the facility has an upper and lower level which matches up with the
education area. He stated the existing fellowship hall is on the lower
level.
Mr. Shuster stated they plan to actually demolish a majority of the
existing structure and add somewhat to the square footage of that parti-
cular part of the facility. Along with that. there is some adjacent
existing kitchen area they hope to update and the addition of some bathrooms
and showers off the gymnasium/fellowship hall.
Mr. Shuster stated they are also hoping to add some accessibility in terms
of a handicapped multi-level lift that would make it possible to move from
the four different levels. Right now, that is limited by the present state
code which allows a lift to only travel a maximum of 54". The State is
presently looking at adopting a new ANSII code that would allow the travel
to be increased up to 12 ft. That may not occur in time for this project,
but they will at least be able to provide some accessibility down to the
fellowsi�ip hall within the present code.
^ Mr. Shuster stated the church presently has a nice landscaping type of buffer
, with relatively large mature trees. especially along Hickory St, and some
nice,newly planted trees along the north side. The one thing the church
really had not done is some landscaping pertaining more to the church than
to the neighbors. The present project proposes to create a green space along
the north side of the existing facility and.the interior courtyard.
Mr. Shuster stated the church presentl.y has a fellowshi� hall at the lower
level below the existing sanctuary. It is really a displacement of that with
an area that is going to be more multi-use, and that use is not intended for
any purpose such as adding to sanctuary space. The present sanctuary is very
adequate at this time.
Mr. Kondrick stated one of Staff's concerns was that the finish of the new
building be compatible with the existing building. What plans has the
church made to do that?
Mr. Gordon Christenson, l84 Pearson Way N.E., stated he was Co-chairman of
the Building Committee and a member of the church. He was also a land sur-
veyor. He stated they have looked at all types of different materials, but
because of budget problems and constraints, they are presently looking at s
precast concrete exterior. They are looking at the possibil3ty of changing
that to brick, but he could not make a commitment at this time. They would
like to go�with brick if it is economically feasible.
Ms. Gabel asked if Mr. Christenson would tell why the church feels they need
�"� this addition.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 23, 1984 __ __ PAGE 4
Mr. Christenson stated the existing facility was built in 1952. and he
thought possibly that structure was built with the intention of eventually
building on a second story. He stated they have been planning
for years to do something about this structure. It is kind of rundown,
and they have problems with the roof. It is very limited in size as to
what it can be used for. It has been called the youth room for a number
of years. He stated they have been in the planning process since 1978.
Their present fellowship hall below the sanctuary is restricted in size
for larger group gatherings. By taking care of the problem of the 1952
structure, they can make a space that is much more usable. They plan to
use the addition as a multi-use facility--a fellowship hall/gymnasium.
At the same time; they are adding some classrooms and making the building
barrier-free.
Ms. Schnabe] asked about the fenced-in area at the back of the building
where there were some school buses and some other equipment. Where will
all that be going?
Mr. Christenson stated there are two school buses, a trailer, and a small
utility shed. They are making no provisions in the project to have that
equipment on site. In some manner when construction starts, they will make
provisions off-site for those buses and equipment.
/��
Mr. Christenson stated the church'did invite all the neighbors to the church ^
on Monday night to show them the plans and discuss the proposed project.
He stated only one person came. He stated he wanted the Commission members
to know that the church did make this effort and basically got no response
from the neigbborhood.
I�s. Schnabe] stated she would have a problem with making a strict regulation
on the exterior of the building. especially when cost factors are involved.
She thought the Planning Comnission's major concern was that the exterior
be compatible with the existing facility and the neighborhood.
The Planning Commission members agreed with Ms. Schnabel.
Ms. Schnabel stated she was glad to see that the church would be putting in
some green space on the north side of the church.
MOTION BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TD CLOSE THE PUBLIC XEARING
ON SP # 84-0 8 BY REDEEl�lER LUTXERAN CfIURCB.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIIVG AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SQiNABEL DECLARED THE
PUBLIC HEARING CLOtSED AT 8:06 P.M.
�
'''�"'� PLANNIt�G COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 23, 1984 PAGE 5
1r10TION BY 1�t. SABA� SEOONDED BY 1�II2. OQUZST � TO RECOMMEND TO C?TY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT� SP N84-08� BY REDEEI+�R
LUTXERAN CXURCN, PER SECTION 205.07.1� 3� (B)� TO ALLOW TXE ADDITION OF A
NEW FELLOWSXIP tIALL AND REMODELING FOR TAE AANDSCAPPED� ON LOT 2� BLOCK 6,
EDGEWATER GARDENS� THE SAl� BEING 61 MISSISSIPPI WAY N.E.� WITX TXE
FOLLOWING STIPULATIQNS:
I. TXERE BE AN APPROVED LANASCAPE PLAN.
2. TXE FINISX OF NEW BUILDING SXOULD BE COI�ATIBLE WITR
TXE EXISTING BUILDING AND IN IIARMONY WITX THE RESIDENTIAL
CHARACTER OF TXE NEZGHBORXOOD.
3. SPECIAL USE PERMIT BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF TXE RICE CREEK
WATERSHED DISTRICT AND CITY ENGINEERZNG REQUIREI�NTS.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRYIOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED TNE 1NOTION
CARRIED UNANIINOUSLY.
Ms. Schnabel stated this item would go to City Council on June 4.
2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT� P.S. �84-04, PLAZA
ENTER DDITIO , RID SIN EDE eing a
rep at of Blocks 1, 2, 3, an 5, Ree s A ition to Fri ley Park, including
all vacated streets and alleys, and that part of the West half of the
^ Northeast Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 14, lying between Lot 2
and 3, Block 1, and lying Northerly of said Block 2, which includes all of
the property between University Avenue and 5th Street, South of Mississippi
Street, down to, but not including the Fridley Bank Property.
MOTION BY MR. KGlNDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST� TO OrEN TXE PUBLIC HEARING
ON PS i►84-04, PLAZA CENTER ADDITIDN� BY FRIDLEH 1IDUSING & REDEVELOPI�NT
AUTHORITY.
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TXE PUBLIC
XEARING OPEN AT 8:10 P.M.
Mr. Robinson stated this was basically housekeeping for the HRA. The plat
would take in al] the property from the northerly property line of the
Fridley State Bank to Mississippi St. and bounded by University Ave. on the
west and 5th St. on the east. The new plat allowed for the Fridley Plaza
Clinic, future expansion of the clinic, new alignment of the roadway�the
plaza, the office building, City Hall, future development of Target, as well
as future expansion of Target, and possible future joint parking arrangements
with Target.
Ms. Gladys Sorum, 411 Mississippi St., stated she lived across from the
Fridley Library. She stated this was a very big parking lot to look at,
and there will be a lot of additional traffic. Will there be any kind of
barrier along Mississippi St.?
� Mr. Robinson stated there will be 7arge trees along Mississippi St., a bike-
way/walkway easement, and then about 20-25 ft. of bermed green space. The
parking lot will also be sunk down a little to soften the visual impact of
the parking lot from the street and the neighborhood.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 23, 1984 PAGE 6
Mr. Saba stated it was his understanding also that there will be an overlap
of shifts at Target, so all the traffic will not be caning in and going out
of the parking lot at the same time.
Ms. Brenda Tibbetts, 421 Mississippi St., stated she would like to express
her concern about the traffic on Mississippi. She stated that recently a
child was hit on 5th St. coming out onto Mississippi. She stated that with
all this new development, she would like to see some consideration given
for the heavy traffic at Mississippi & 5th St., possibly with a stop sign
at Mississippi St. and 5th St.
Mr. Saba stated this was a very valid concern, especially with the bikeway/
walkway along the parking lot and children riding their bikes and crossing
Mississippi to get to the new comnunity park.
Mr. Robinson stated a traffic study is being made of this area. He stated
he would bring up this traffic concern so it is taken into consideration
as part of the study. ,
1NOTION BY 1NR. KONDRIQC, SECONDED BY 1NR. SABA, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC NEARING
ON PS N84-04, PLAZA CENTER ADDITIDN� BY FRIDLEY HOUSING 6 REDEVELOPHENT
AUTHORITY.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAI�JOMAN SCXNABEL DECZARED TXE PUBLZC
HEARING CZASED AT 8:25 P.1N.
1NOTION BY XR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF C�1ISIDERATION OF A PRELIMZNARY PLAT, P.S. #184-04, PLAZA CENTER
ADDITION� BY FRIDLEY NOUSINC. � REDEVELOP!►�NT AUTHORITY, BEING A REPLAT OF
BLOCKS I, 2, 3, 4 AND 5, REE'S ADDITION TO FRIDLEY PARK, INCLiIDING AT•T•
VACATED STREETS AND ALLEYS, AND TXAT PART OF THE WEST XALF OF TXE NORTHEAST
IiALF OF THE SDUTXWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, LYING BETWEEN LOT 2 AND 3�
BLOCK 1, AND LYING NORTHERLY OF SAID BLOCK 2� WHICX INCLUDES ALL OF TIiE
pROPERTY BETWEEN UNIVERSZTY AVENUE AND STN STREET� SOUTH OF MISSISSIPPI
STREET� DOWN TO� BUT NOT INCLUDING TXE FRIDLEY BA!'lK PROPERTY.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRWOMAN SCNNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMWSLY.
3. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PER�4IT SP #84-09 BY
� ICH RD E. GREE : er ection 205.15.1, 3, D, of the Fridley City Code,
to a ow a repair garage on Lot 1, Block 1, Target Addition, the same
being 765 53rd Avenue N.E. (See Appeals minutes of 5/15 for variance)
MOTION BY 1�2. OQUIST� SEOONDED BY 1�2. KONDRICK� Rb OPEN TSE PUBLIC HEARZNG
ON SP #84-09� BY RICEARD E. GREEIV.
�
� �
^
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE, CBAIRW01►!AN SCHNABEL DECIARED THE PUBLIC ^
EEARING OPEN AT 8:27 P.1�l.
� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 23, 1984 PAGE 7
Mr. Robinson stated this proposal was for a repair garage on property
presently owned by Dayton-Hudson. The property was zoned C-3; and because
this was for a repair garage. it required a special use permit. All the
surrounding zoning was commercial. He stated that on May 15th. the
Appeals Cortmission approved variances to reduce the lot size from 35�000
sq. ft. to 22,171 sq. ft., to reduce the required front yard setback from
80 ft. to 66 ft.. and to reduce the required rear yard setback from 40 ft.
to 10 ft.
Mr. Robinson stated Staff had the following concerns:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
An approved landscape plan.
A manageable slope must be left on the east side of
greater than 3:1.
If bad soils are found� petitioner must provide soil
plan which includes protection of car wash property.
Petitioner must agree to have no outside storage of
at any time.
Require that operation manage their used oil or other hazardous
waste through appropriate means.
An approved drainage plan be required for building permit.
the lot not
alteration
cars or parts
�. Mr. Oquist stated there was a former Precision Tune on Silver Lake Road.
a It is now just a garage. and there are a lot of cars sitting around all the
time. If this special use permit is granted to Precision Tune. and for
some reason� the use changes to a plain repair garage, what happens to the
special use permit? .Would the special use permit be issued to the owner
and if� for some reason, Precision Tune moved. the special use permit
• would then expire?
�
Mr. Robinson stated that was correct.
The petitioner, Mr. Green� stated there was another guarantee that this would
not happen. He stated Target reseryes the right to approve any future
business owner.
Mr. Green stated the only change to this request was they may not have the
drive-through bay as previously planned because of energy considerations.
Mr. Oquist stated that wi�hout the drive-through bay, they may not have
a�y trouble with the slope on the east side.
1�. Schnabel asked about the poor soil conditions.
Mr. Green stated they have not had any soil tests taken, but they are
reasonably certain the soil is quite poor. If necessary, they will go
Mith pilings. The excavating companies he has talked to feel they can
excavate without endangering the car wash property.
Ms. Schnabel stated she thought the number of parking stalls was a little
excessive for just three bays and the rapid repair turnover. - —
PLANNING CONU4ISSION MEETING MAY 23 1984 � PAGE 8
110TION BY 1�lR. SASA, SECQNDED BY lQt. OQUIST �� CLOSE Tf1E PUBLZC XEARING
ON SP �84-09 BY RIQiARD E. GREEN.
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL WTING AYE, Cf1AI�►O1NAN SCANABEL �CLARED TGTE PUBLIC
EEARING CL0.SED AT 8:42 P.1►!.
1►lOTION BY 1�2. KONDRICK� SECGINDED BY lQ2. SABA, TO RECOM!►�ND TO CITY COUNCIL
�ip� PROVAL OF CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT� SP N84-09� BY
RICXARD E. GREEN� PER SECTIQN 205.15.1� 3� D� OF Z'XE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO
ALLOW A REPAIR GARAGE ON LOT L, BLOCK 1� TARGET ADDITION� TXE SAME BEING
765 53RD AVENUE N.E., WZTB TIfE FOLLOWING STIPULATIG1NSs
1. THERE BE AN APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN.
2. A JNAIVAGEASLE SLOPE MUST BE LEFT ON TXE EAST SIDE OF TI�E LOT NO
GItEATER TXAN 3:1.
3. IF BAD SOILS ARE FOUND� PETITIONER !►lflST PROVIDE SOIL ALTERATION
pLAN WHICH INCLUDES PROTECTION OF CAR WASX PROPERTY.
4. PETITIDNER 1�lUST AGREE �O IiAVE NO OUTSIDE STORAGE OF CARS OR
PARTS AT ANY TI1�.
5. REQUIRE THAT OPERATION lIANAGE THEIR USED OIL OR OTHER HAZARDOUS
WASTE THROUGH APPROPRIA� 1�A1VS.
6� AN AppRpyED DRAIIV,�GE pI,AN BE REQUIRED I�R BUILDING PER!lIT. .
7. SPECIAL USE PER1lII4' =R -Z+S�'[1-"D TO TNl PROPL•�tTY OWNL'R AND NO'l
BE TRANFERABLE WITXOUT APPROVAL OF TAE CITY OF FRIDLEY.
UPON A VOICE VOTE� RLL VOTING AYE� Q1AI�ii�►OMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
,�
Ms. Schnabel stated�the special use permit request, along with the variances, _
would go to City Council on June 4.
(Mr. Oquist left�the meeting at 8:45 P.M.)
4. LOT SPLIT RE UEST: L.S. �84-05 BY JOHN HITCHCOCK: Split off the Southerly
eet o Lot , Secon Revise u�tor s Sub iv sion No. 21. the same
�being 6530 Oakley Drive N.E.
Mr. Robinson stated the lot in question is zoned R-1, located on the corner
of Oakley and Mississippi St. The present lot is 18.811 sq. ft. The
petitioner is proposing to split off the southerly 86 ft. to create a new
R-1 lot. Both new lots would be over the 9,000 sq. ft. needed.
Mr. Robinson stated Staff would recomnend the following stipulations if
this lot split was approved:
1. The following variances for the existing structure be approved with
the lot split: front yard - from 35 ft. to 25 ft.
rear yard - from 25 ft. to 21 ft.
2. Require owner's signature on the lot split request
3. Park fee on one new lot of $750
4. Existing home to change address from Mississippi Sti. to Oakley St.
5. Lot split be recorded at the County, if approved. �..�
�
� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETIN6, MAY 23. 1984 PAGE 9
Ms. Schnabel stated the Planning Conmission had a problem with the owner
not petitioning for the lot split.
The petitioner, Mr. John Hitchcock, stated he is under contract with the
existing property owner to buy the lot. He stated he was sure this had
happened with the northerly lot that was split off some time ago. At that
time, the petitioner requested the lot split and was granted the lot split.
Mr. Hitchcock stated there was a change in the lot split request. The
86 ft. should be changed to 84 ft.
Ms. Schnabel asked Mr. Hitchcock if he had talked to any of the neighbors
in the area across Oakley St. or west of the lot about the visual impact
of putting a structure in front because it would be set further ahead of
any other house in the irtmediate area.
Mr. Hitchcock stated he has not talked to the neighbors across Oakley. The
property owner to the west is the father of the person he is buy�ng the lot
from� and he was the only property owner he had talked to.
Mr. Hitchcock stated when he discussed this with Bill Deblon, Mr, Deblon
� felt that since this house faced Oakley, it was applicable to the houses on
Oakley.
Ms. Schnabel stated she still had some problems with that house setting so
far forward, even though it was an Oakley St. house, rather than a Mississippi
St. house.
Ms. Gabel stated she had a problem with the variances being approved with
the lot split. She did not think this had ever been done before with a lot
split. Since it was a housekeeping type of thing, that might be the reason
for it; but by not following the variance procedure, it eliminated the public
hearing process whereby the neighbors would be notified of what was happening.
Ms. Schnabel stated she saw the following problems with this lot split
request:
1. The variance situation--granting the variances with the lot split.
2. Not having the actual owner on record with the lot split request.
3. The situation of the setback impact on Mississippi St. This
should be checked out with respect to the setback requirements in
the Zoning Ordinance or a legal opinion. Would this be setting a
precedent?
Ms. Schnabe] stated she realized the petitioner was anxious to move on
this, but she thought possibly the Planning Commission should table this
request until their June 6th meeting when these problems can be clarified.
�,
Mr. Kondrick stated he agreed that tt�is request should be tabled until these
questions are answered.
��,
PLANNIIJG COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 23, 1984 PAGE 10 '
Mr. Hitchcock stated he strongly objected to this. because of the fact that
he had made himself available to do everything the Staff had requested.
A10:'ION BY AlR. RONDRICK� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO TABLE LOT SPLIT REQUEST�
L.B. N84-O5, BY JOFJN liITCXCOCK� TO SPLIT OFF TNE SOUTXERLY 84 FT. OF IAT
8X� SECOND REVISED AUDIT�OR�S SUBDIVISION NO. 21� THE SA!►� BEING 6530 OAKLEY
DRII�E N.E.� UNTIL T1YE FOLLOWING CONCERNS CAN BE CLARIFIED:
1. TNE VARIANCE SITUATION WITFI REGARD TO GRANTING VARIANCES WITX
THE LOT SPLIT.
2. NOT XAVING TIiE ACTUAL OWNER ON RECORD WITX TNE LOT SPLIT REQUEST.
3. TNE SETBACK I1�ACT ON AlISSISSIPPI ST.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CiiAI�O1�1AN SCXNABEL DECI.ARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANZINOUSLY.
5. LOT SPLIT RE UEST: L.S. �84-06 BY ANNETTE POESCHEL: Split the South
. eet except e or an excep es .75 feet of South Half
of Lot 31, subject to easement over South 30 feet) into two parcels to allow
zero lot line for a double bungalow, the same being 1571-1573 73rd Avenue N.E.
Mr. Robinson stated this property was located to the north of 73rd Ave.
and east of Hayes St. The property is zoned R-3. The property is surrounded
by a mixture of R-1 and heavy industrial to the south. The existing lot is
12,822 sq. ft. The petitioner is proposing to build a double bungalow on
the two split parcels with zero lot line. This meets all the setback require-
ments. He stated Staff would recommend the following stipulations:
1. Signed zero lot line covenant (The City provides a standard agreement
to the owners to promote good maintenance.)
2. Park fee of $750 on one new lot
3. Lot split be recorded with the County.
Ms. Schnabel asked if this double bungalow would be a one-owner building or
would each half be sold off?
The petitioner, Ms. Annette Poeschel, stated the bungalow would have two
different owners. She stated she owns the property now. She will be the
owner of one half, and her partner will buy the other half.
MOTION BY lyR. SABA� SECONDED BY 1�2. NIEISON, Tb RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL
AP OPR VAL OF LOT SPLIT REpUEST� L.S. �184-06, TO SPLIT THE SOUTB 138.10 FEET
(EXCEPT TGfE NORTX 1/2 A1Va EXCEPT WEST 92.?5 FEET OF SOUTH EALF OF LOT 31,
SUBJECT TO EASEI�NT OVER SOUTH 30 FEET) INTO TWO PARCELS TO ALLOYI ZERO LOT
LINE FOR A DOUBLE BUNGALOi�I� TBE SAI� BEING 1571-1573 73RD AVENUE N.E.
�
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CNAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TIIE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. '�
Ms. Schnabel stated this item would go to City Council on June 4.
0
� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 23, 1984 PAGE 11
; ,
6. RECEIVE MAY 3 1984, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES:
140TION BY 1�2. KQNDRICK� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO RECEIVE TEE 1�lAY 3� 1984,
BUMAN RESOURCES C01�IJNZSSIQN 1�lINUTES.
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� QYAIRW[�MAN SCXNABEL DECLARED TXE MOTI�N
CARRIED UNANIAOUSLY. '
7. RECEIVE MAY 8, 1984, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION BY 1�2. SABA, SECONDED BY 1�2. KONDRIQC, TO RECEIVE TXE 1NAY 8� I989,
COMMUNITl' DEVELOP!►�NT COMMISSION 1�lINUTES.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRWOAlAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TXE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
- 8. RECEIVE MAY 15, 1984, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECOII►DED BY lQi. KONDRICK, TO RECEIVE TXE 1NAY 15, 1984,
APPEALS CO1►lMISSION MINUTES.
UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� QiAIRWOil.�W SCXNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION
�
.�� CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY.
� ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. NIELSON, TO ADJOURN TXE MEETING. UPON
A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED TXE 1►l.9Y 23� 1984�
PLANNING COMMISSION 1►gETING AA70URNED AT 9:45 P.1N.
Respectfully submitted,
� t�
y e Saba
Recording Secretary
,-�
r �