The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 04/03/1985 - 6849PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY, APRIL 3, 1985 7;30 P.M. James Robinson { ��: ! i, � 'Y`�� `_ "" U • � - � �YriA.�M�-7� �;n.cxti� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: City of Fridley AGENDA WEDNESDAY, APRIL 3, 1985 APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: FEBRUARY 27, 1985 1. APRIL 3. 1985 AT PETITIONER'S 7:30 P.M, PAGES 3/2� Agenda PUBLIC 1 - 8 n�nn�i�u. �vn�iu�nn�a�n vi �.��vna�w �y�� - �> BY GERALD G. JOHNSON: Rezone from R-1 one family dwelling) '..o C-2 general business), Lot 5, Block 5, and Outlot 1, Donnay's Lakeview Manor, to be used for commercial devel- opnent, generally located at 5698 West Moore Lake Drive N.E. Would you please continue to table this item until a meeting across the hall is finished. That meeting and this meeting concern people who are interested in both meetings. Should be around 8:00. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP k85-01, 9- 16 ANAE NANSON: Per Section 205.09.1, C, 5, of the Fridley Gity Code, to a w Rule 36 Residential Mental Health Program for Anoka County, on Lot 1 and 2, Block 14, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville, the same being 6378-5384 5th Street N.E. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: RF.QUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE �ERMIT, SP NR5-02 BY 17 - 21 R BERT .NDERSON: Per Section 205_07.1, 3, A,.of the Fridley City Co e, to allow the construction of a second accessory building, a 24 foot by 26 foot detached garage, on Lot 13, Block 3, Brookview Second Addition, the same being 6800 Oakley 5treet N.E. 4. VACATION REQUEST, SAV q85-02, BY ARNOLD M. KUHNLY: Vacate the foot drainage and utility easement on the North side of Lot 14 and the South 2 feet front and rear of Lot 15, Block 1, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 4, in order to install a driveway and erect a garage on the rear of the lot, the same being 6747 Washington Street N.E. 5. TABLED 2/27/85: LOT SPLIT, L.S. #85-03, BY ROBERT GILSTAD: Sp it off the Easterly 120 feet, except the Northerly 135 feet of part of Lot 1, Auditor's Subdivision No. 25 (see file for legal) to be used as a parking lot for the apartments on Lynde Drive. (Moore Lake Apartments Complex) Leave on table until April 17, 1985 at petitioners request. 6. RECEIVE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION WORKPLAN FOR 1985 22 - 27 3/2� Agenda 7. RECEIVE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF JANUARY 31, 1985. 3/20 Agenda PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 3, 1985 -- PAGE 2 PAGES 8. RECEIVE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES OF 3/20 Agenda � 10 il 12 RECEIVE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 9, 5. RECEIVE ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 26, 1985 RECEIVE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 7, 985. RECEIVE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAR�H 14, 1y�5, 13. 07HER BUSINESS: ��'"`�� vU ��. 1nc�w'�� `'� A�JOURNMENT: 3/20 Agenda 3/20 Agenda SALMON WHITE _ «- m�`y PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNIN6 COMMISSIOh Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Comnission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Nednesday,March 20, 1985 in the Louncil Chamber at 7:30 P.M, for the purpose Of: Consideration of a rezoning request, ZOA N85-01, by Gerald G. Joh�son, to rezone from R-1 (one family dwelling) and R-3 (general multiple dwelling) to C-2 (general business) Lot 5, Block 5, and Outlot 1, Block 1, Donnay's Lakeview Manor Addition, to be used for Commercial development, all located in the South half of Section 23, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. Generally located at 5698 West hbore Lake Drive N.E. Any and a>> persons desiring to be heard shall be 9�ven an op;ortunity at the above stated time and place. � THIS ITEM RPRIL 3, THE DATE HAS BEEN TABLED UNTIL 1985, PLEASE DISREGARD OF MARCH 20, 1985. Publish: March 4, 1985 March 11, 1985 VIRGI��IA SCHr;FS�L CH�I Rt;�Mn'� PLANNIN6 COMN:SS10�� 1 CITV OF FAlDLEY. {4�1 UNtVEPS1TY wNE. NE. fAIDLE�', MN. 65a3C (6121.571-S�fO � - a a 8s SUBJECT ZpNING ACTION ZOA N_� �—c / VACATION SAY M PLAT PS N ORDINANLE NO PUBLISHED ADDRESS �L�qf3 Ll��`¢ I17COf'P � A'C (�►'iU� DATE VLANNING COPMIISSION: APPROVED DISAPPROYED DATE N0. CITr COUNCIL: DUBLIC HEARING DATE 1ST READ 2ND READ LITY COUNCIL: APPROVED DISAPPROVED DATE NO PARK FEE REQUIRED: AMpUNT PAID STIPULA7ION5: c� /t H,t c t1 yc. � f' 2 NAME fEE J�'�'�RECEIPT NO I'SS�O� STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY �",�_1 -'1"G" - ' ' �,,,,.. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (�, i S �3G. /L ��^� G�TL•1 / i.JL� ./� / PRESENT ZONING LLASSIFICATTON �� Ip 2 3 EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY V/�c Ar r ACREAGE OF PROPERTY DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROPOSED 20N1NG CLASSIFICATION OR TYPE Of USE AND IMGROYEMENT PROPOSED � n� Fr•+-, !L "� �!t'3 • b• �—�- � �i e� 2� (,-fr�i - � .il..� irii �5"'f �-3 'f- 3: " f f �„-., Tr ,� � n Has the present applicant previously sought to rezone, plat, obtain a lot split or variance or special use permit on tfie subject site ar part of it? _.__yes no. What was requested and when? The undersigned understands that: (a) A list of all residents and owners of proper- ty within 350 feet must be attached to this application (rezoning), 300 feet, (plat- ti�g), Nila be aitached to'this ApplScation. '(b) This application must be signed by all pvners of the property, or an explanation cjiven why this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any defect in the proceedings resulting from the failure to list the narres and addresss of all residents and property owenrs of propgrty in question, belongs to the undersigned. A sketth of proposed property and structure must be drawn and aYtached, showing the folla+ing: 7. North directio�. 2. Location of the proposed structure on the lot. 3. Dimensions of property, proposed structure, and fron and side setbacks. 4. Street names. 5. Location and use of adjacent existing buildings (within 350 feet). The undersigned hereby declares that all this application are true and correct. DATE�„[�/.� �9%r SIGNATURE. and respresentations stated in ADDRESS��.,�•`/.1 Tirr�/ �� s""� "9NE N0��1/� �3 Mailing List for ZOA N85-01 Gerald Johnson Gerald and Norma Johnson 712 River Lane Anoka, MN 55303 David G. Hedman 5695 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Sadie H. Gunderson 5107 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Joseph B. Fahey 5779 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Dennis J. Nolan 5733 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Frances D. Decker 5741 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Bernard Young 5751 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Robert J. Cook 5�61 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Arthur Olson 5771 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Theodore Bray 5781 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Arlen Erdahl 5791 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Roger Papke 5801 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Kay Ingebrigtsen 5811 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Arne Morrison 5821 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 � � Planning Commission March 6, 1985 i*Y.77� � � �i�t`�j—% r+�d,:�i :, City Council Mark Ingebrigtsen 5831 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 James E. Juhl 5841 Nest Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Kathryn Jacobsen 5851 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Jesse Winters 5861 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Bernard Wedgewood 5871 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Bahrom Nikrad 5881 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 David Pohl 5891 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Edward Holland 5901 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Mr 8 Mrs. Jerome Boedigheimer 5890 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Pawel A. Skabrat 721 Marigold Terrace Fridley, MN 55A32 Robert K. Olson 730 Marigold Terrace Fridley, MN 55432 Jay R. Lowinske 584� West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Harry Trowbridge 5830 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Thomas Hlavinka 5820 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Page 2 ZQA M85-01 Eva K. Oahl 5810 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Harry Nawrocki 5800 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Pelagia Adamski 5790 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Ikbai Elsafy 5770 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Timothy Ziegler 574A West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Frederick C. Graf 5734 West hbore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Robert Steenerson 5724 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Ross Haidle 5714 West Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 John Jaeger 5745 Jackson Street N.E. fridley, MN 55432 Terrence L. Doty 5735 Jackson Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Leonard W. Piepho 5725 Jackson Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Thorwald C. Peterson 5715 Jackson Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Watlace Lhallstrom 5705 Jackson 5treet N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Chester E. Andersen 5695 Jackson Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Dorothy Seaberg 5685 Jackson Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Wi11 iam Kel l 5675 Jackson Street N.E. fridley, MN 55432 Roy Peterson 5665 Jackson Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Llyod Engler 5655 Jackson Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 James W. Locker 5664 Jackson Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Earl P. Weeks 5674 Jackson Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Charles G. Haussler 5684 Jackson Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Dennis Drinkwine 5694 Jackson Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Betty L. Schack 5704 Jackson Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Elmer P. Kurize 5714 Jackson Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Donald C. Winters 5724 Jackson Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Ralph L. Rosendahl 5734 Jackson Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 David E. Scott 5744 Jackson Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Donald Wedmark 754 - 58th Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 4 Page 3 ZOA M85-01 Oavid W. Rust 5735 Quincy Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Richard 6lumac 5125 Quincy Street N.E. Fridley. MN 55432 Mallace H. Jorgensen 5715 Quincy 5treet N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Ro4ert L. Gordier 5705 Quincy Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Richard F. Young 5695 Quincy Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 John N. Hoff 5685 Quincy Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Edward G. Griffith 5675 Quincy Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Floyd H. Hessevick 5665 puincy Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Union Oil Company 1650 East Go1f Road Schaumburg, IL 60196 Raymond Steward 5747 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Robert Gilstad 930 Hackmann Avenue N.E. Fridley. MN 55432 �� . �/La..�„ 'y1a7,� J'SN 3Y ' �/ 5 ' �- _ E � � � � �j„� - i". 'i� a ��1....� ��. .�/'i/ ��`--r:... T` � . : � �� _ _ �` �� - , ��`� � __ � b �� N .�,. W�..�.� �E �. / S � zoa �a5-oi 6 5698 W. Moore Lk Dr ��F-.. - cn, ar � =t -� - - ' : :i; : -° � � 1QrMG , � �CJ100. . �� Oi71rC�f �� TI�Cfi �� t� , ='r`- 3E + . i `—_1 � _ `-'� a C._ - �'- . �� _ _ � � __ . ° ` i . ; :. _ _. _ ' � • — - ' I `J -� �`..��'��' ` _ _ ; _._ � � -� V i J �� ., 1 ~ � � �` _. e- -. - (_ . �n`,.`� -i„��t l e " � ��' '��'� 1, . � � _ �� ' _ �l� J _ _ -_ 1 _- s •�"T��_ � `�j_�--� _ I -'-' _; '- � . . __- �� /"-,—� t __,�- �T i�- � �� L i � ' S � � l J �'._�/ '.' / �� _r � '�,�' �' ' -_. i f � , _ ' :.% 'ti «'_ - J / � �\ !, = f � � � ' -` ' �L _ 7 �- ' 1 ' � i ( �� -- __ �- _' - - � [°= �t _ �. 1 �y�� _ � _ � I ^' ' � . + f L��=' I�_ �.� i. '�:1 -' i� ,r-��I}�'� Y �`:4�� '.�.� �`i`�� _. � � -c ..�f_ 11 }�'.°-''.:.,��..i � . • . �(� � .._ _ . �_ - ' j � �+� C � � - • � ..•� V '"�'� �' � . �.��i. ` � . . , � f ._ �' �1 � _ �- -_ } �' � ��.-. � i .. $ f 1 � �. ' / � � . • . •�_+y� .- .- '_ . ,",� � � - . � . �• � � , . t �'i » �_ • 1 ` , .�- --� ��• �' _c,` � H� _ � /; .�',� ,a.� � � V ��il.,� �� j T � �'c_� . h •��/ ' ; _ �_:,; �'�' ,- r =,� , , ,-, _ j---�-_�.i 1-, - • ,^_� : � ;i:_' ... _. � _ , —= �` z -' � -' 'z' � = t i � � �—�:��- .!—T _..— —-;-1 _ -�.r "J '-�=�-- - � `� `i i �� ' � ' " - : - a � . ,' � -'� � �- �t`�= �_I � t � , � , _ , . i', i - __ : r� . _ ' / � :.�; � �� .�` ' �r' •� - � Tt. Y. _ ".' _ � '�-�--�.. i �'_- =3��._.' ��' _ _ �: � �(y 1/ - 3 I � I/ � •r � � ' — ��•} � 1 '' ! E__� � � ' � �♦ j �� J ;' �d. i i= � ! 7r � - ' � _ .I1 _ � �� ,,a,, �;- , :�— Y�''T� `-- __. i� y 1 = -_ ; ^; `� �' - #� - � ' , 1�\ � i �� _ Ir � . �, -._. : - , `:�` '� 'fi'''?', i.,. � _= `r..- isS'.:' _s �...-�� _ .� —_, — - � F'' , r� �� . �� ` 9i . , I: � ''i ''i . � � /i '• � �1�.��.5q- . ta � � �; -,� �. �' - -- I ",�' �'� � � _� _ ��-- < � � � , � V� � ---_:�.�+� , � �=a, �.� �_ , , — ��_ , - � � -i � � � � � , „_ � - .- !T,� �i 't,�' �—' _` -.� � � � ;�� ' ____' �-- . ` �_ __��' 'i� -_-- � �--_,: ' . .� r .. :��4y �—�-- REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT BOUNDRIES � fMADED ARE/�S ARE TAX INCREMENT DISTlIICT• �_. t•t•. . �_ ��.i.i..,� = �. z � �:: �15��95�70i � ZOA #85-01� ,.. e' S698 W. Moor ake . AVE. N.E. ¢� . . i � �io '�• j.� . ; �,s t I , ;Y, �, �1, , : + o .� ..•�, . � �� ✓ � �y•� � v ' , I . � 5, . �� .w1 !'t 'Z� /) �5��• � - . r � a' s� � — � �!� 7oi 7n sz�'� ��' 's �y�► ,.. . •� � f s ' ..; • ,� O TERRACE �7 t'st�• � � + *•• � . , •. .�,. �. �1 ±700 �Z e=72o 7lo:sy" � � S�?. �� f � . ■ :' ��_Eyl� � ' � B ��'�'° o �,5 �< � � y ri , � � i � _ ir _ !�� q •.• _`O '�� i�� • , ' �', )p� 2r � Z't t `� i � i �9� 7a �ti ?z�� ii !�� , �` � . �� ---sss " )� ' �1 � �YTp , 1 ��' � � . ''''.. ' =s+,y_- � . ; r � ` 1 � wi M. �� t� . 7io 7t� rs .6' •�'�tn o. ♦� Vf + I 2 3 7G�2 �` � s � ` SK�� z �� `1S� y~ ~. I � 701 ��IA � S N. �. � 573� : i 7�� f � ..rr � ! , �-.�� zs .� 5�� S�� : s�W si�_.. , O.I _�JJ \ � I ` 57�2 �� 573f SZ 51�! . ,� i CE ,s. h --,r .. ` s� t s , � �90 �f 5�.�5 � 5�B ,� � �Z �� v ti � � �� -�' � `� 5T�/ i�� il 1 "�►. 4 d > 9 ts 1 �r°�Y'`r� „�� t 2 J � 7 I... � _ '4 . 71� ; l� � � es � �s ? :5-�3 _ s�. � s � ' /'� �` } � NE + � s�� S�::t � - y� . . ...• _ s� • Z _� �1�..,� 5�55 5 b� � Y S�� i �~- . � �O Ldo �?� • .i ,. � � J O = 6, ys S�71 � 5�� ._ l � r � '� J r � � tti5 t'f 6� S j� '� '"�' s � � ' � - ' � �� '.. �- - — - - 'r � SbsS � �a T�-'� . �:..: . -'-'. ' . - � � >I TOR�3 _ - - ----i- � - - 10oTW�N �I M l�•7 s _. _> _ O��M 1 -a ; ��J . . - — -- - r� . 1 � �r •- I t- rr• : � . -+- � � ° i" '�(Ptn .' '.r� j�• - ! /� . i•1•�,,.-. 5600 �''° �«r� 1_,,. � ... r '�' ! ` �� j � . \ r � J I � � � �, • : ! [ -�---- ~�....�-�.-� � t PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, April 3, 1965 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 P.M. for the purpose of: Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP #�85-01, by Lommunity Options, Ltd., per Section 205.09.1, C, 5, of the Fridley City Lode, to allow Rule 36 Residential Mental Health Program for Anoka County, in a 4-plex located on Lots 1 and 2, Block 14, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville, the same being 5378-5384 5th Street N.E. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. VIRGINIA SCHNABEL CHAIRWOMAN PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: March 18, 1985 March 25, 1985 0 CITY OF FAlOL�Y, NO� UN�VEASITY INE Nt. fA1DLEV. MN. 6:s��C tf1T� 677-i��0 �coaESS _�37� y�3ra5 - SUBJECT SPECIAL USE DEFUfIT . � sP tgrra PLIINNIN6 CObMpS5I0N: APPROVED _OISAPPROYED DATE N0. CITY ODUILIL STIPULATIONS: NAME_'+�(pn�P HQh STREET LOCATION OF APPROVED DISAPPROYEO OATE M�. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF.PROPERTY /� RECEIPT NO 5�c PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION EX]STING USE OF'�ROPFii'(Y'�o�"� / ACREA6E OF PRODERTY DESCRIBE BRIfFLY THE SPfLIAL USE APPLIED FOR: Section of the Lode: Has the present applicant previously sought to rezone, plat, obtain a 1ot split or variance or special use permit on the suDject site or part of it? __�es X no. Mhat was requested and ►vhen? �5 The undersigned understands that: (a� A list of a11 res�dents and rnmers of prooer- ty within L00 feet w111 be attached to this application. '' ' ' �• '(b} Shis application must be signed Dy a11 owners of the property, or an exp7anation �iven ►rhy this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any ,jefect in the proceedings resulting from the failure to - list the names and addresss of all residents and Qroperty a+enrs of propgrty in Question, belongs to the undersigned. A sketch of proposed property and structure a�ust be drawn and attached. showing the following: 1. North direction. 2. Location of the proposed structure on the lot. 3. Dimensions of property, proposed structure, a�d fron and side setbacks. 4. Street names. 5. Location and use of adjacent existing buildings (within 350 feet). The undersigned hereby declares tAat alt the facts and respresentations stated in Lhis application are true and wrrect. DATE��/r /r/Q�� SI6NATURE_�.,�� TELEPHONf N071,�r"—Y�(8'a�l�(c �,- ��a-goa6 10 Mailing List for SP M85-01 by Comnunity Options, Ltd. Mr. Herbert A Zwirn 5�00 - 3rd Street N.E. '/ Fridley. MN 55432 Mayne A Johnson 11610 - 53rd Avenue North� Plymouth, MN 55442 Don E Klostreich 2509 Hillview Road " Moundsview, MN 55432 John Jensen 6070 - 6th Street N.E: Fridley, MN 55432 James S Burman 20980 Sycamore Street N.W. Cedar, MN 55011 Eugene f Welter 5704 - 56th Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55429 Michael J Anderson 5366 - 5th Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Steven W Soderholm 5336 - 5th $treet N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Larry Nelson 5323 - 4th Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 William J Frawley 169 Crown Road fridley, MN 55421 �uane L Schwartz 2525 - 118th Avenue Coon Rapids, MN 55433 Allan A Swenson 1865 County Road E White Bear Lake, MN 55105 Stephen T Lischalk 5357 - 4th Street Fridley, MN 55421 Planning CommissionMarch 15, 1985 Patricia J Siedlecki 5380 - 6th Stree£ Fridley, MN 55421 Gary R Stockwell 5372 - 6th Street fridley, MN 55421 Walter Galay 5329 - Sth Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Aner D Sturgill 5331 - 5th Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Dallas H Schute 5365 - 5th Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Raymond J Lafave Jr. 5375 - 5th Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Pol ish Cathol ic Lhurch 2200 - Sth Street N.E. �r-{d9-e� MN 55A21 � r. ...<� _ _ -.. J ��. 11 �` -- ,'si..�:R.:+l��ir. 4• E � t �r •� .. . . .: �,r�-„ , . ! : ' " '�' ' ' ' •..9.r-ra..�'_ .�'Y ' . � �- ..� r�� ►l� '- :-' • ,� • I� �_ I � � �� ` , •� � �" � � yi * L . � .. � `�, f : - •.� .-- ... .i_ . �� .. , �• • • � r� . .;. "�� ,�_; � �; �. �- --* �r� e �• :3:�"`�. � � '•.- O I �'•` '{ �. � '� -�+ � '� ��! 3...tf � ��.. . .. .:... _._. ._- � � ..: � � •� i,1 � s � � � . 1 • � .. •, , -- - -. ..;-. :: : �_ - ; N�► Ar •• _.. •�- - ' _'li!_ '�_ � �� i �� ' -. . ' �� f .. j. ,_�;: �N �7 � �' . s - -' —' 3 s � �•-r . � � i� .�,. � i � � � 70� ■' . � • • � �• � � 1 � � .�•�`i � �� ! �• �r �• �__ � ____ ��-�� '� •'`:•"�r� � 1N - -�I- -'-'#---•C- _. T_ E. R S rc � �: �� . �_ '��0.f , � �_�� ... � . � . " � w r ' ' ' t � + �� r � � ' ` � � � �` !U � �� 9 {1 � � .► , � . cMu�► —� � . � �+ * �•� • -• • -- • ..+ 1 .+ . � � � .` LOCATlON NtAP I� I r , � ! � a � lt.:J � � � � � � � � ��a �y rCI ., :_ r�. .'�=-; _ � � �i � •. • �� '_ a r' I ��,�SZ�,�e � " S4 TM 5�10 � g391 �Sf� SLI: 3 � �w/t � M ! p / n.�. S 3 � s� s� j � � r �, r� o .� a ,�� i sD+► sli S2S �� . � vz :S'� soo � . �� r�., r • � �_... ,51� 6 ;' Sii' As � --� tt�- - r-- � v�caMr� /.: w\ �', 'j, i, � %////l/. L za 14 .__ _.. _ .irw. a�. ..e�- - _- �.-. -. _ -i--- _-. =-.- - � ,� . . . , l-r�/tc r. I - , . � I ' '. ' . __ [Z'lo• i ,I �� I I F--_-�n-:s��c,� � _�y--+ �r i '� wc... > ��c - \ � w� � � ; `r�owo� ur.. , .ur.. �.:Zau.a w.�..�..i. O � _ �� ' •M� Yiw{ t71 /��r.[ uk / .r. 'a�.�.=- \.Y•v.+rl� � 1 •• a �� •I Y�10E -�f�y,� �,• f 1 .ATy1[M � .�..i... � � " f(� - -ls' =-#- �=T��-� ��u' L'ri. �nur.r.ut ' �w�. �� : _ �� . _ �c �Y M�. ecuo. nui �� . -iA VN �y 4r�tiE�n �Q� �oa Du� /1�.LKlsRfW � • � e�oe� - RA(CtLI hRK�NG� O � � _i i � t / � ' I i ! �� I ,f I � w � � I � 7UL[TO/ K�E� . . �� . a��s�. _� , --- � c � �. 4 _ -M1 \ . � ,j,'prYO� LIVMi { 11GOY I.' w .+`rr '" I' � � arscc " ... . ., .: . � �� _ -) _ . _ _'n's�_ . y �' YIR�VM W�l� \ 1 � \/ �I I P 1 V i � ' � ' � I � �-- --? 1 i � i 'ClOrM41 IINi 1 . i� . � �Yfiu� 6 • • • : � T _��M .__�_� �4QGR �LA � - APARTMENT _BLDG u I 1 i , i , � � ��_�� , � _ : � � � ' � a�� 1 � �--- - - - —�" � � �__, - �`__ — - I � � �'''' I• � ' i � r i i , ,--� � , � � ii�� r f � .— � LJ I » � � � �+ � ' � ``, � E, � ; I' ; j � � • ,. . � �o � '� ; =, �� r f � 3� �� ; ' � - � i � . 'i , ., ' id i ' � ;:—!f i � �J.�, `it � L� � ; �VO� � ! J � , � ��I � � }' � f � j —1 I �— I A� � c S I I!' i � Y.� � � • � � �;�'!"�, ry �� , e, J I Li � � � ` . �1 + �7 I � :'. r ± 1 1 ' L � � � � � ( I ��1 . � `� 1 � I�� , I � T] � �1� 1 �!� /� �� ,I� j 'r— ° � J �� , t ; � � � ' 3 � f �7 ` `�- � � � g , . ,' Y �� . � . i � �; • � r, • Q v . � ' �� I � I _ -- _�' -- — 1° J � � � . � � ' � I + � f � , �� P. �`�i o,� , M l �--- ��,.. �� • : i ` �.,{, � < ��, � �� _ ' `': W � � i , . — , � � � --- , � ` �j --� � . , �� i, I I I1 I � � . � � I ,I . ( � �� . � , ' � I , I� . ., tl . C . . , . I ; � J ' t J I '.�.: 1 � , �� . ,, . � � � J dt J .. j 1/ �� . � � � . d � ` \ � — � � ,- --� Vr— O � O � M = 15 i------ -- - = .o• os �---,��-.ii - --�7#-�-.o_,l� �-� �. � � i� o ■' i ■ : � "" i O � � a q i + � tl -' I O � � � ^� �i ; - � �. I 1_/'� �'��., �. _ � �---r'--p_ _ _ _ -- i . 7 � o- O� � O � - � �� Y � �� O 0 t � � r � � � r � �J �� ai U -s � M�� , —`l y q � � r,o , �►'� � � ��' .i Q O � ~ � b� ; + +� . . � f1� � � ..,rl V s��n)rt Z� u� ry, OI ,�' { —V `./ v r « . �. � � � o s '�' O q,i �' � � - �� - _ � • , � �` -. v . � � � W � �—'_-..o-.�t ____ —� �� i' ' . �--- � � ri � � -i $ � � � I � �i 1; � ��--- �{ � ��1� � r--- � � 1 ` i ' . � L--- 1 r I � � � 1__ + r - - i i I � { � � L__ �I 1 i J 1 I �OI /�! i . i o� o � M; 3 i � � I i o, ' '-yr! 1 N I{ Y � , i Fi ' } �=i W \ "o y�j I �� t � I �� " O � �� t ��d i 7 : ` V � � � s� ; � � t � o `o° � � ° � s: 3 `�t+o ,Q;�-.: � = 0 y Y • � : � .• .r � � : = : = Z � ; r ..ai.��°3 0 y `c�; '� z :� � �.. n � �� 8 6� 1 � w o s, i c � - o �� p: o' � o o - z ��p( J� � O C�� n Q: � L �+ � ii ' dp� ` � O 8 Z� y� z O T' Q� p � T"� � W O�.� F/� "� -' I� V �� 2 Z Q Z.n LL M1� � J' o� �-c u9s � 3 � r ot a �"� �p v� I? � t] r�� °� LL a r O W J f W� t� O Z w N d'� n O , V M � a�°�J�V 3i'��q��'e�' o� �`'- V Z � � m > LL � C Z� W " � H � v a= a� Q 4 � � Z�- �� ¢ r � � � 16 . ��:�- u ,: �:. COUNTY OF ANOKA COMMUNITY HEALTH 8 SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOURTH FLOOR COURTHOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 612-421-4760 Ext. 1390 Puel�c Healt� Nursvog $erviny Ennro�mentai Meaitn Semces Mentai Meartb. Me�ta� ReLrtl�bo�. :�i�lT46� DlpE�CBT�y $prv�tl5 City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue, N.E. Fridley, I�Ba 5543� F�m�ly 6 GTifE*sn'1 S�rv¢es Volunteer $�rv�CN �pvllODme�VI ALAiMlTlnl Centlf5 March 5, 1965 To City of Fridley Council Members, Planning Commission, and Planning Department, This letter is to confirm Anoka Co�ty'S selection of Conrtnunity Living Options, Lid, as program vendor of residential services for the chconically mentally ill. Moka County Social Services conducted an extensive review process where interested gcogram vendors weze evaluated through a R�le 36 Proposal Review Comrittee. Rased on tfie committee's point assignment and canking and the pcoviders' participation in formal intervievs, the comonittee determined that Comnunity Living Options, Ltd. would best meet Anoka County's needs as p:o9ram vendor of Rule 36 services. On February 21, the Anoka County Board of Com�nissioners approved Social Services' recormnendation to begin contract negotiations vith Diane Wright and Ranae Hanson, the operating providers of Comnunity Living Options, Ltd. It is expected that the final contract will be approved by the Anoka County Board of Co�nissioners by April 23, 1985. This contract vill require compliance vith the regulatory and monitoring procedures set up by the State Department of Human Services that require quality standards from a Rule 36 facility, (i.e. Rule 36 licensure, com- pliance with the Vulnerable Adults Act1. The State Department of Health also requires a Supervised Living Facility licensuce, Which will also be a contract component, Moka County Social Services has requested that the facility be located in Anoka County, provide a family, home-like atmos- phece, and be accessible to ccisis services and public transportation. Anoka County is lookin9 forward to vorking with Co�mnunity Livin9 Options, Ltd. We feel confident that this facility will be able to provide quality secvices to Anoka County's chxonically mentally ill population. If you have any questions, feel free to call me at d21-476D, ext. 1399. cerely, �� , ��.�n� Diane N. Stanq Rule 36 Project Developer AHirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer Harch S, 1985 Eugene and Diane Wright 1848 Yum3ce Point Eagan, Minnesota 55122 612 452-3145 We have been asked to verify to the Planning Co�ission and City Council that we have a legal and binding Purchase Agreement on the building located at 5378-80-62-84 fifth. It is our intent to lease this property/building to Community Options, Ltd. for the purpose of running a residential treat- ment center. Should there be any additional questions, please feel free to call. �� Diane M. Wright �� Eugen R. Wright Community Options, Ltd. 1928 Stevens Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 March 1, 1965 r Mr. Jim Robinson, Director Planning Division Fridley City Hall 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Dear Mr. Robinson: On behalf of Community Options, Ltd., I am requesting a Special Use Permit from the City of Fridley for the property at 5378-5384 Fifth Street. We are requesting a permit to use this building as the site for the Anoka County Rule 36 program. Anoka County has proposed Community Options, Ltd., as the vendor to provide Rule 36 services (residential mental health services) for Anoka County residents in need of and appropriate for such services. This building has been determined to be the most appropriate available site for such a pro- gram. with this letter, I am enclosing documentation and inform�.tion regar- ding program design, program administration and staffir�g, program purpose and philosophy, client characteristics, program ac�ountability and funding, appropriateness of program location, building purchase, facility floor plan, facility site plan, Anoka County vendor choice, and Anoka County program and building requirements. Please note that the program itself has not yet been named; we are considering names and would welcome suggestions from the community. Anoka County has requested that we begin providing client services on June 1, 1985. If possible, we would like to receive the Special Use Permit early enough so that we can meet the County�s request. we will, of course, provide you and the community with any additional information you should need. We are anxious to receive suggestions and recommendations from community members and will be looking for concerned persons who can serve in an advisory capacity to us. Sincerely, R�naQe�H nson�� Vice-President and Secretary, Community Options, Ltd. Administrator, Anoka County Rule 36 Program (as yet unnamed) Enc. COMMUNITY OPTIONS, LTD. ANOKA COUNTY RULE 36 PROGRAM PROGRAM DESIGN Summary Paraqraph. The program will serve fourteen ad�lt men and women who are mentally ill. Ten residents will participate in the 12 to 24 month intensive therapeutic program; fouz will participate in the 2 to 4 month transitional therapeutic program. The proqram will provide a spectrum of services to meet the residential therapeutic needs of Anoka County clients. The pzo- gram will maintain Rule 36 and SLF licensure. ' Tar et Population. The program is designed to serve adults who are at least 18 years of age, have a primary diagnosis of inental ill- ness, and are appropriate for intensive residential therapeutic services. Most ciie�ts will have a diagnosis of thought or affective disorder, have had a history of psychiatric hospitali- zations, and be on psychotropic medications. They will enter the program with varied levels of functioning in independent living skills and community involvement. Clients with a secondary diag- nosis of chemical dependency or behavior problems will not be admitted to the program unless the behaviors associated with their secondary diagnoses are manageable within program con- straints, pose no significant threat to persons or property, and would not greatly impaiz the client"s ability to participate fully in the program. - Priority will be given to Anoka County residents for ndmission. Services. Grounded on the psycho-social model of rehabilitation, the program will use both milieu and social learning therapies. Residents will be guided through their stays by Individual Pro- gram Plans (IPP�sI that adapt the program to the individual"s personal strenqths and needs. The program will provide for assessment, therapy and socialization groups, individual therapy, family services, independent living skills training, client par- ticipation and advocacy, IPP development, vulnerable adult assessments and protection, crisis prevention and intervention, leisure and recreation activities, case management, education and vocational services, support groups, aad networking with external agencies. Location. The program will be housed in a spacious, modern four-unit apartment building at 5378-5384 Fifth Street, Fridley, Minnesota. It has ample space for programming, socialization, privacy, and parking. Staff. The staff will consist of an Administrator (half time), a Program Director, a Thezapist, a Counselor, a Nurse (half time), an Indeper.�ent Living Skills Specialist, a Recreation Specialist (three-quarters time), several Mental Health Workers (three and thzee-quarters time all together), and a Secretary (half time). 'itiaenty-four hour, seven day a week staf; coverage will be provided. All staff will meet Rule 36 Mental Health Therapist, Counselor, or Worker qualifications. COMMUNITY OPTIONS, LTD. PROGRAM DESIGN, cont. ANOKA COUNTY RULE 36 PROGRAM Licensure. The program will be licensed by the Minnesota Department of Human Services under Rule 36 as a Category I proqram and by �e Minnesota Health Department as a Supervised Living Facility. vill hold an Anoka County Service Contract and a Fridley City ecial Use Permit. Placement Procedure. Referrals will be made by calling the facility during zegular business hours. After telephone assessment, individual interviews will be arranged at the program site. To be admitted, clients must be appropriate for the program and must provide social, psychologicai. and psychiatric histories, doctor"s medication orders, a physical, and proof of ability to pay for services. FUnding. Program costs will be paid by Anoka County. Out-of-county residents must have a signed Placement Agrc•-�ent from their home county of financial responsibility. Room and board costs will be paid by the residents, usually throuqh GA, SSI, SSDI, MSA or private funds. OPTIONS, LTD. ANOKA COIINTY RULE 36 PROGRAM PROGRAM ADMfNISTRATION AND STAFFING The Anoka County program will be owned by Community Options, Ltd., which is made up of Diane 011endick Wright and Ranae Hanson. iane Wright is Currently President and Administrator of North- st Residence (a Rule 36, Category II Supportive Livinq Facility n Brooklyn Center) and was formerly Administrator/ Program Director of Park Manor Residence (a Rule 36, Category II Suggor- tive Living Facility in Minneapolis). lis. Wright has a Master"s Degree in Social Work, eleven years experience in human services, and eight years experience as an administrator of inental health programs. Ranae Hanson developed and administered Janus Treat- ment Residence (a Rule 36, Category I Treatment Facility in Bloomington) for three years and developed and administered March House (a Rule 36, Category II Respite Facility in Minneapolis) for ten months until her resiqnation from willows Convalescent Centers, Inc., in December of 1984. Ms. Hanson has a Master"s Degree in English, is working on a doctorate in American Studies, and has been invoived in human service development and admin- istration for seven years and in mental health administration for four years. The program will be administered by Ranae Hanson. (See qualifications above and attached resume.) A Program Director will be hired who has, at a minimum, a Master"s Degree in the behavioral sciences or a related field, one year"s experience in direct service to mentally ill persons, and one year"s experience in supervision, proqram design, and program implementation. The program will have staff coverage twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. Staff will consist of a Mental Health Therapist, a Mental Health Counselor, a half-time Psychiatric Nurse, an Independent Living Skills Specialist, a three-quarter time Recreational Specialist, a half time Secretary, and several Mental Health Workers (constituting three and three-quarters positions among them). Durinq regular work hours, four to five staff will be at the facility, weekends and holidays one to two staff will be there, durinq evenings two to three staff will be on duty, and at night one staff Qerson will be awake and at the facility at all times. During evening, night, weekend, and holiday hours, a back-up professional staff person will be on- • call and available. All staff will be trained in mental health service provision (almost all will have BA"s and several will have MA"s in counseling fields) both thzough prior training and expezience and through on-going in-service training at the facil- ity. Program staff will work closely with residents" county social workers, psychiatrists, and other involved professionals. The program will employ the services of a Licensed Consulr_ing Psychologist monthly to provide outside program consultat�on. All program staff will be supervised by the Program Director. COMMUNITY OPTIONS. LTD. ANOKA COUNTY RULE 36 PROGRAM PROGRAM PURPOSE AND PHILOSOPHY The Board of Directors of Community Options, Ltd., is committed to servinq persons with mental illness. It is their goal to encourage the attainment of responsible, productive, and satisfying independent or semi-independent living for those residents who enter the program. The Board is committed to hiring staff inembers and to implementing proqram policy ar.d procedures that convey the respect, esteem, dignity and self-determination rights of every individual. The Board affirms their responsibility and intent to comply with State, County, and City codes and rnles. Residents will be provided with a positive and reinforcing environment to promote a sense of community and responsibility to- the group. Self-esteem and motivation will be enhanced through an emphasis on zesident autonomy and decision-making (through Resident Council, Peer Review, Advisory Council). Residents will be provided both individual and group counseling to develop insight into theiz individual strengths and needs. Through a process of on-guing assessment, residents will gain self-awareness, increased understanding of inental illness and the relationship between mental and physical health, and increased ability to identify psychia- tric symptomatology, thereby decreasing decompensation and potential re-hospitalization. Through assertiveness, stress management, and peer support groups, residents will learn more productive ways to communicate and interact with others while managing the stresses of daily living. The program will be grounded on the psycho-social model of rehabilita- tion. It will employ therapeutic interventions that address here and now problems residents experience in daily living. This theoretical model assumes that, while deficits or excesses in emotional, coqni- tive, and ideational behaviors may be psychological in origin, the importance of the social environment as the context in which most behavior occurs is crucial to intervention strategies utilized within zesidential settings. Thus, treatment at the program will incorporate elements of both milieu and social learning therapies. The former emphasizes social interaction, group activities, and peer support as a means of increasing an individual"s skill level. while the social learning model has much conjunction with the milieu therapy model, it puts more emphasis on individual response to reinforcement and the principles of instrumental and associative learning as vehicles of chanqe. What works or is helpful to one client may not have much impact on another. Staff expertise, flexibility, and clinical acumen will be significant in the determination and use of effective treatment stra- tegies for each indivzdual. Offering a number of different individual and group interventiar-.� will reduce the likelihood of a resident "failing" in the program and encourage clients" self-deter�ination and decision-making abiiities. CO3'4MUhITY OPTIONS, LTD. ANOKA COUNTY RULE 36 PROGRAM PROGRAM PURPOSE AND PflIyOSOPHY cont. The program will include: Assessment, Czisis Prevention/Intervention/ Management, Therapy and Socialization Groups (Morninq, Goal Setting and Review, Asseztion Trai:.�ag, Stress Management and Relaxation Training Exercises, Men"s and Women"s, Health and Well-Seing, and Peer Support), Individual Therapy, Family Services, Independent Living Skills Training, Client Participation and Advocacy, Individuai Program Plan (IPP) Development, Vulnerable Adults Assessment and Protection, Support for IPP Success, Socialization Support, Leisure and Recreation Activities, Case Management, Educational and Vocational Services, Motivation and Remotivation Tzaining, Support Groups, Social Services, and Networking with external service providers. COMMUNITY OPTIONS, LTD. ANOKA COUNTY RULE 36 PROGRAM CLIENT CAARACTERISTICS The program is designed to serve,adults, male and female, at least eighteen years of age, who have a primazy diagnosis of inental illness, are able to live successfully in a community setting. and are in need of intensive treatment services. Individuals who are actively chemi- cally dependent oz abusive and individuals with a secondary diagnosis of inental retardation cannot be considered for placement. The program is not appropriate for individuals who are exhibiting behaviors that are harmful to themselves, others, ar property. Typically, the clients will be withdrawn, lacking in self-confidence, unable to sustain jobs or significant relationships, and unable to complete tasks of daily living lsuch as cooking, apartment cleaning, or promptness at appoirtr.�•:ts) in a snstained fashion. They may ex- perience confusion, phobias, difficulty in communicating with others, unzealistic expectations, depression, or self-destructive desires. They will be in need of the therapeutic program to learn to comply responsibly with their medication regimes, to come to terms with painful past experiences, to leazn to meet the demands of independent living, to find ways to get along effectively with others, to benefit from the program"s support as they enter education and work programs, to learn satisfying ways to interact with their families and friends, or to complete other, similar tasks. Such Anoka County residents as these are currently beinq placed by the County in Rule 36 grograms or board and lodging facilities in oLher counties or they are living, with less than optimal success, indepen- dently in the community or with their families. To be forced by lack of local resources to move to a distant or more crowded metropolitan location is often a harmful experience to such people, vulnerable as they aiready are. Some have been hospitalized because there has been no appropriate community placement available to them. These clients need a residential treatment option in their home county so that they can obtain support and therapy without having to 1Fave their home area and, thereby, lose the support of their families, their friends, and the organizations they are a part of. With such a grogram available, many of them will be able to return to, oz attain, independent oz semi-indegendent living, maintain or develop personal family and friend relationships, and avoid future hospitalizations. COMMUNITY OPTIONS� LTD. ANOKA COUNTY RULE 36 PROGRAM PROGRAM ACCOUNTABILITY AND FUNDING The program will be accountable directly to Anoka County through the contract that binds the program to provide services specified and regnlated by the County. T'he County vill fund the proqram directly for ilbout 55B of its budget (ior all but room and board costs). This money comes from both State and County sources. Seventy-five percent of the money comes to the County through State Rule 12 funds. The other twenty-five percent of the money comes from a County match to that State money. The program will continue to receive this money as long as it meets Anoka County contract requirements so that its con- tract is renewed each year and as long as the State money is avail- able, which it appears it will be for years to come. Zn order to accept clients, the program must also be licensed by the Minnesota Department of Human Services as a Rule 36 facility. This licensure regulates all aspects of program functioning--staff require- ments, facility space requirements, program design, program reporting and accountability, sta.`f training, resident rights, record-keeping, and much more. The Department of Human Services will license the facility before it begins to operate and annually thereafter. It will investigate at any time during operation that it fee:s appropriate. The program is also funded through roon and board costs (approximately 458 of the budgetl that are paid to the pzogram by the clients. Sometimes clients have private funds out of which they pay these costs but more frequently they pay with money that they receive through General Assistance, Social Security Insurance, SoCial Security Disability Insurance, Minnesota Supplemental Assistance, or private insurance. In order to operate as a facility that offers room and board and that provides medication supervision, the pzogram must also have a Supez- vised Living Facility license from the Minnesota Department of Health. This license regulates facility operations such as food handling, kitchen facilities, room space requirements, facility furnishings, client rights, staff training, client supervision, health records, medications handling, building up-keep and cleanliness, and the like. The pzogram will obtain this license before beginning operations. The Health Department will inspect the facility annually thereafter and as often dnring the year as it deems necessary. To qualify for Health Department Licensure, the facility must also meet a11 State Fire Marshall requirements. The program will hold a Fridley Speciai Use Permit to allow it to operate the program at the proposed site. The program will abide by any conditions agreed upon in that Special Use Permit. OPTZONS, LTD. ANOKA COUNTY RULE 36 PROGRAM APPROPRIATENESS OF PROGRAM LOCATION The building at 5378-5384 Fifth Street in Fridley wili meet the requirements of the pro�°am quite well. It was not easy to find a available site in Anoka County that could house fourteen residents camfq�ctably vith ample interior space fo= staff offices, resident soCia�ization and privacy, and proqram activities and with ample extezioT space for parkinq. The site also needed to be accessible to public transportation and other service providers. This buil�ling offers all these amenities. The building is in a area zoned for multiple family dwellings. Other buildings in the area are four- or six-plex apartments. Because the program wiil house not more than sixteen clients, it is a legal use in a muitiple family zoned area. The area shows some slight needs for rehabilitative up-grading. Because the facility will maintain a well- kept, improved appearance, it may even serve to improve the imagE of the neighborhood. The transportation needs o: the program are well served by this site. Bus service is available four blocks away. The building is situated within several blocks of major access routes, yet it is not itself on a busy street. In back of the building are four tuc;c-under garages, one of which will store the program van. The parking lot in the back is slightly below street level, entered from the alley, and large enough for eight vehicle= to park--more than will be likely to be at the facility at any one time. In addition. the bui:ding is on a cozner lot, so the minimal program traffic that there will be will not inconvenience others who use the aliey access. The building is made up four side-by-side units with a long awning in front s:�eltering its four entrances. The lot has few trees and minimal landscaping but will be improved by the addition of a privacy fence and shrubbery, both of vhich are planned for the summer of 1986. The intezior of the building is remarkably well suited for proqram needs because of its three-floor, side-by-side construction. Each of the four units have large living rooms and large kitchen and dining areas on the main floor. An open stairway leads from the living room up into the bedroom and bathroom area. Because the bedrooms (two in each unit) and bathrooms are on the third floor. they offer optimal privacy to residents and can be maintained sepazately from the main- floor program activities. The lower level contains garages, laundry rooms, and storage spaces. It will be used for van and program stor- aqe. Some of the areas could easily be converted into small staff offices and program recreation areas. The building will require minimal remodeling. A doorway vill be cut between each of the units on the main floor for supervisory and pro- gramnatic purposes. One kitchen will be converted into a commercial kitchen to meet Health Department requirements; the others will have their stoves, refrigerators, and sinks removed (a simple and easily reversible operation in these kitchens) so that they can be used as COMMUNITY OPTIONS,_ LTD. ANOKA COUNTY RULE 3E PROGRAM APPROPRIATENESS OF PROGRAM LOCATION (cont.) offices. A wall will be installed between the livinq and office areas in the three units where the kitchen area is to be used as an office. T�e �proqram should offer little threat to the neighborhood since the resiAents it accepts will be screened to eliminate any who are likely Lo be dangerous to persons or property in the neighborhood. This is not a program for people who aze danqerous or criminal. Because most problems that may arise will likely be caused by misunderstandiags about the nature of inental illness or by poor communication between the program and its neighbors, Community Options, Ltd., is anxious to begin communication with its neighbors as soon as feasible. If the neighbors do not have a good understanding of the program and its residents, they could be a threat to the well-being of the program"s residents. Community Options, Ltd., will be seeking neighborhood input into the development of its Advisory Board. If a neighborhood pezson can be found who will sit on the Boazd, that person can help the program maintain good com�unication with the neighborhood. The program will always be accessible to neighborhood people who have concerns or su59estions about its, or its residents", interactions with other neighborhood people or about the program"s impact on the area. Because remodeling changes will be minimal, it would be a simple matter to use the building again as an apartment building should the program no longer need it. Rsnas Saason 1928 Stevea� Avrnue 8. ltian�apoli�, 14i 55403 la0GTI0NAL 3!►CRGROUND: �pgppRATg ppARD/ADMIliISTRATOA (612) 872-9035 Ph. D. caadidate vith 43 credite in American Studiee at the Univeraity — coureework in womea's studies, organizational etrueture, eulture studiee, hietory, geography, claeaics, and pcetry. The focus is on organization and creative expreseion. MA in Englieh vith a Comparative Arte ninor fram Ohio University, Athene, Ohio, 1974. BA in Literatnre with high school teachiag certificatioc�fromudeetawe Adolphus College, St. Peter, I�Sinnesota, 1972, magne Year abroad on an Institute of Europeaa Studiea Scholarehip Durham University, Durhsm. England, 1970-71. p4LOYl�l1T flCPERIENCE: Directoz - l�tental Rcalth Divisioa, Wil:ows Convnlescent Centere, Inc. January 1964 - Duties include development of the mental health div3sion, ads.inietrator of Janue Treatment Fesideace aed Kerc?� Houee program. development for Willowe Rule 36 program, p�'+�tai health program development, eneuzance that liceneure aad contract campliance is met and maintained, superviaioa of pzogzam directora. fiaca2, aad adm:n:etzative etaff, service coordin- atioa end_yublie re�a�oae�_ -- Adminietrator - 1'Ierch Honse - A Reepite Care Facility, Apr*_2 1984 Janua - Categorq 1 i1111wa Treatment Res±dence Jaauarq 1982 Reaponeible for deve:oprient of the Janus Program, htr?ng staff, obtaining SLF liceneuse, obtaSn3 Rule 36 licensure, obtaiair.g Bloomington Conditional Use Permit, hiring and supervtsir.g etafi, eomplying vith reporting require- aenta, eneuring high quality program�ing. Program Developer - iTi:l�+.+s Convaleecent Cer.tere, Ine. Septeaber 1961 - December 1981 �esponeible for developing a Rule 36 program pro?osal, negotiating a 8ennepin Couaty contract, finding a building, developing a staff. Neighborhood Deve2opment Reeearch and Wziting for BRW. Znc. - 1980 - 1981 The assignment was to work vith a neighSorhood plannez, a corporate foundation. and a neighborhood group and [hen to vrite a hov-ta manual about community organiziag, neighborhood revttaliz2ag, noaprofit deveiopment, reeource scquisitlon. co�unity netvorking. ptogrem planaing, aad evaluation. Center for Touth Development aad Research, Daiversity of Minaeeota Occober 1980 - September 1481 The assignment iaeluded the establiaiment of a state-wide youth servlcee coordinetion aetwozk, editing isauee of a national youth services �ournel on institutional abuse, experiential education, youth aad the law and othes topice, and inveatigating Minaeeota policy and decieion aaking �tructures zegarding youth rmp2oyment. . Ln�blsr�, Inc. - 1978 - 1980 The assignment included iaveetigdtion of ywth servicea issues for publication and policy development. Ma;o: topice ineluded loeked detention of youth, peychiatric treatment, child abnse, sexuality training, and parenting. Other assignmenia were to assist in the rriting of a book on nonprofit development, coordina:e workshops on staff development, board developcient, and the like, aad seeume management reaponeibilitiee. Teaching Aseociate for Communication Pro6raa - Univereity of lSinneeota ' 1977 - 1980 Coursee included day •chool aad exteaeioa studiea of writing, speaking, and cormaunication theory. Instructor of Eaglish - Oniversitq of Minneaota, Korris Campus 1974 - 1977 Included the estebliehment of a vriting support pro�eei and aetive participation on numerous eomm=tteee. ieaehing Fellw of Engltsh - Ohio University ' 1972 - 1974 ' PUBLICATIONS: co-authored with Inetitutional Abuse of Chiidren and Youth, Editoz The Link A Youth Servicen '�evsletter, Editor coarox�►xE no� DZANE OLLENDIC[ WRICBT. A.C.S.ii. 1B48 Pumice Poiat p,agan, }Sianesota 55122 (612) 452-3145 WRRBIiT POSITZON: , ' ' Aotthvest Residence; Inc. - Rule 36, Category II Supportive Living l�cility. l�lnneapolis, Miaaesota 55408. Yreeident and Adminietrator - Ylanned, developed and adminieter a reeidentisl mental health treatment facility; manage all aspectee of enployer relations; prepase and negotiate budgete; salary administration; long term planning; fiecal management; eztensive profeeeiona2 and co�anity involvement in legielative/ •dvocacy and edueational issuee; expertiae in zoning, conditionnl uee permit proceee aad neighborhood/co�unity involvement. (June, 1983). PROFESSIONAL !ffi�ERSBIP/COl4::TTEE WORK National Meociation of Social Workers Aeademy of Certified Social Siorkese � Aule 36 Residential Forum of Hennepin Courity. Past Chair, Current Executive Committee member Minneeota Aseociation of Reeidential Mer.ta3 F!ealth Facilities, Chair Mental Health Aaeociat±on, Hennepin Cour.ty. Boazd Member, Executive Co�ittee riember Mental Health Aseociation. State, Regional Delegate Meatal Health Advocate Coal:tion Northweet Human Servlces, Aftercare and Houeing Committee Supervised Living Reeidence, Ruie Deveiopment Coffiittee Moka State Hoapital, Advieory Council Emergency Needs Project. Aouaing for the Homelesa EXPERIEt3CE 1, park lfanor Reeidence - Rule 36. Categorq I: Supportive Living Facility, Minneapolis. Miaeesota 55408 Adminietrator/Program Director - Adm:niatered ell agency'e functione and implemented and direcced the treatment program (Mareh 1962- April 1983)• 2. Booth Brovn iiouse Services - Reeidential Treatment and Shelter Care for • Adolescent Girls, St. Paui, Minneaota 55108. Dates; Maieh, 1977 - Auguat, 1981 pdministrator - Planned, developed and administered t!:e ageacy's goale, 'objectives, policies snd procedures; coanaged all aepectea of employee telations; prepated budgets; admiaietered salaries; negotiated eounty tontracting; developed long term pro;ections; vorked with the Board of Directore; eooducted public relations and marketed the agency'e servicea. (Auguet, 1980 - August, 1981). 2. Eooth Brovn Eouse Services (eont`) Treatment Director - Deeigned, inpleaented aad directed the treatment progrem; evaluated progrea effectivenees; hired and trained etaff; psovided individual aad group clinieal supervision; conducted intake �tudies aad client progresa rev*_evs; eoo-dinated interdepartmental aad comunity needs aad functiona (Narch. 1977 - AugueC, 1980). Yrofeseional Involvement - Sesved as a delegate to the Kinnesota Council of Resldential Treatment Centere, ho2d3ng poeition se Secretary to the Ex�cutive Co�ittee snd Chairperron to the Conference Committee; member of the Me�berahip Coamittee; conducted peer revieve for mesber sgeneiea. 3. Iwa State Depattment of Soeial Servicee - Youth Servieea Divieion, Souix City. Iwa. Dates: Septenber. 1973 - Auguet, 1975 Youth Service Worker - EvaluaCed. recamrmended and eupervised ca�unity and inetitutional pl�cemente; provided intensive individual and familq couneeling; inveetigated and preeented iuveniie eourt reports; conducted group therapy for deilnquent girle; taught educational groups for youth and parents; licensed and eupervieed foster homea; supervieed etudent interne. ' INTERNSSIPS, VOLU"iTEER WORK AND PA�T-TIME E�L01'�NT: Internehips ae a social xorker treSnee in the areae of marriage and femily therapy. residential treatment, psych'_atric aocial vork and adminietration. Volunteer vork in niata aad as s fostez parent, big sieter, neighborhood rorker and an advocate for mentally retazded children. Psrt-time employment ae a raitzese and receptioniet. EDUCATION Bcisr Cliff College, Siowc City. Iwa Ma�or: Sociology Atinor: Psychology Received Bachelor of Arte Degree - Ci:m Laude - itay, 1983 The Univereity of Wieconsin. Na2lson, 4Tiseons:n Graduate School of Socia2 liork Received Msecers of Science Social Work - Auguet, 1976 lteatal Health Certificate of Training Univer�ity of Minnesota '_"02 - 1983 MANAGF�NT TRAINING:_ Pinance 6 Accountiag for Non-Financial lSanagers Gtoup Work in Administration She Laa 6 The faploymeat Proceas Supervision/Employee KoLivatioa Performance Revievs Leaderehip Style Team Building Time Management fliring 6 Piring Data Privacy •• coo � '�. . � t, ,• yyFSO � ^ � �� ' ' � � , � '� ��y' . �� COUNTY OF ANOKA 011ece o1 fbe County Board o/ Commissioners COURT FiOUSE ANOKA. MINNESOTA 55303 421-1760 Mcrch 22, 1985 I•LBERT I�. KORD�FK�Cbvrryn Cw��v Bw�a oi Canmm�onp� �_ Community Options Limited 1928 Stevens Avenue South Minrxopolis, Mt�l 55403 Aftention: Rmoe Hanson Vice Presidenf � Secretcry Deor Ms. Hanson: I have been out of town fw several wceks ond have just received your letter relntive to your decision to locate a mental txalth facility at 5378 5th Street. First, you should know fhot I have spent a lifetime during my 31 years as Counfy Commissioner pioneerinq progroms for fhe mentolly retarded and the mentally and physically handicapped adults. I wos on ttx steering committee for the first Daytime Activity Center in Anoko County, I was on the Board of Directors for "RISE" inc. which is the f irst orgonized center in Araka County for mentolly md physically handicapped adulis md I was on the originol board that organized tlx first mento{ heolth progrom in Anoko County government. I feel, fherefore, fhat my record in ihe field of support of progroms for people sufferirg from mmtal health problems is well estoblished. However, I do not feel that your decision to locate o facility ot 54th d, 5th Sireet is in the best interesf of either fhose to be served or ihose people who live in ihe odjoining Qea. Tfx building you have chosen is in the midst of o residential orea, which i�cludes maiy homes on smoll city lots with o very high density population surrounding ihe building. The neighborhood reaction I hove received So date is negof ive and �nderstnndable. While I am sfill not completely acquainted with all aspects of your program w tFx types of individwls to be served, if appe�s as though your patients will require a high level of wpervision md ihat in itself wi�l undoubtedly cause coruideroble concern to people in ihe neighborhood. The building is located on o{ot fhat is small in size when considering parking needs for friends, visitws md stoff for this mmy people in that one small building. Adequate recreafionat facilitia ihof 1 presume would be on �ssentia) p�t of your progrom are cwnexistenS md procTicolly rvery otFxr supportive service is no where neor ihis facility. �' � ,. � i� . . 4, n"- ��,.. �� Poge Two By copy of ihis leffer !o the Mayor of the City of Fridley, Ed Fifzpotrick fhe Cify Councilman representing ihot disfricf, ond to Robat BQnette, Councilmai-ot-LQge, I an requesting ihoi they supporf ine in requiring Comrnunity Options to select a site fhot is compatible wifh the Qeo and one that in foct will have community support. Co�sistent with my past octivities promoting mental health programs, 1 offer my help fo yo� in selecting what I would coruider e more oppropriate sife fhan ihe one you hove under considerotion. Yours very fruly, Albert A. Kordiok Chairmm, Aroka County Boord of Commissioners AAK:ran cc: Mnyor Bill Nee City of Fridley Councilmon Ed Fitzpatrick City of Fridley Councilmm-at-Lorge Robert Barnette City of Fridley Manoger Nasim Dureshi � City of Fridley George Steiner, Director of Community Health 3$ocial Services Marge Otten 531 I 4th Street, ►J.E. Fridley, MT1 55h21 Community Options, Ltd. 1928 Stevens Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 March 25, 1985 Commissioner Albert Rordiak District 4 Second Fioor, Administration 7lnoka County Courthouse Anoka, Minnesota 55303 Dear Commissioner Rordiak: Friday, March 22, I spoke with you about Community Options' plan to begin a Rule 36 mental health treatment program under contract with Anoka County in Fridley at 5378-5364 Fifth Street. You told me during that conversation that you had written a letter indica- ting that you could not support the program location because of concerns about the neighborhood. As we talked, I clarified for you the characteristics of the client population we will serve. At your request I agreed to describe that population in writing. As I have said, we will not accept criminals, people who aze in need of alcohol or chemical dependency treatment, or people whose behavior would be dangerous to others or to property. We are also not connected with Anoka State Hospital or part of it in any way. Our residents will be people who are able to live in a community setting, not people who should be in a hospital, Frequently, they will be people who are now living with their parents or with friends, people who are living in their own apartments in a less than fully successful fashion, people who are living in community foster care, or people who ase in similar Rule 36 programs in other counties because there has not been a residential option for them in Anoka County. We will have a thorough intake process to assess each client referred to us to ensure, among other things, that those we accept will pose no danger to the neighborhood. It has been my experience at the two other programs I have administered, that more often clients are vulnerable to the community than that the community is vulnerable to them. Our clients are often with- drawn, insecure, and lacking in the skills that could enable them. to have jobs and live successfully on their own. These will be the skiils we will teach in the program--skills like cooking, apartment cleaning, getting along with othezs, arriving at appointments on time. We will accept ciients who can live inde- pendently or semi-independently after the program. It is impor- tant that during the program these residents live in an area as similar as possible to the residential areas from which they have come and as similar as possible to the areas to which they are likely to move. Because our clients, who usually are not wealthy enough to own cars, need to get to school, to jobs, or to volunteez placements, we must be near a bus line. � � We are concerned that the program be a comfortable home for our residents; therefore, we are planning several upgrading activi- ties to make the building more appealing. We will plant trees, flowers, and shrubs; we will build a privacy fence. We will keep the building well-painted in pleasing colors and in good repair. We will have no problems with parking as there is ample space in the rear parking lot for the five to six cars that may be there at busiest times (the lot vould hold eight to ten cars); in addi- tion, ve are on a corner property so any additional parking could be on the sides of the streets directly adjacent to our building. As I told you on the phone, we are hosting a meeting for people from the neighborhood to meet with us and disc�ss the pzoqzam and its relationship with the neighborhood on this Thursda}�, March 28, at 7:30 p.m. at the Roslyn Park Wesleyan Church at 5300 Sixth Street in Fridley. just two blocks from the building. You and anyone else vho is interested in the program and the neighborhood are very welcome to attend. I will forward copies of this letter, as you requested, to those to whom you sent yoUr letter. Thank you much for your time and concern, both for the neighborhood and for our clients. I look forward to a congenial, non-threatening relationship with our neighbors. Sincerely, ��C'L�J�Gk�� Ranae Hanson Anoka County Rule 36 Program, Administrator Community Options, Ltd., Treasurer cc: Mr. William Nee Mr. Robert Sarnett Mr. Edward Fitzpatrick Mr. George Steiner Mr. Nasim Qureshi 2 JE STANG, Anoko County Proj�ct dir�clor, ond Notoli� Hoos, counly commissioner, speorhaodad drivv which r�sultsd in the r�cent approvol of a Rul� 36 residsntial facility for m�ntolly �dicapp�d adules. Such o ixility will k» estoblisMd in Anoica Couny by Jun�. �'��ounty to get facility for mentally handicapped An alternative W state hospitali�tion. Rule 36 acility, will provide residential nre for 1� mmtally ndicapped adults by June. 7tiis is a 4rst fw Anoka That's the word from Natalie Haas, county m missioner, and Diane Stang, project director. Final apprnvel was received by the state and camty 'thin Ihe past tew months. The facility will catc to dia�osed aa having a primary menlal Iwvlth ••We're no1 taiking about the dangeraa people, we'rc Uiking about people who are going Wough a severc crisis m their liva," Haas said. As an example. Haas and Sung mted Wt it would be for those people +ho experimce intense tlwughb ot suicide. necvous bnakdowns or severc depression. � From whatever fhe depression stems, Haas and Stang said that the tacility wilI pcovide psycholopcal Nvapy to hdp tlxm cope wit1� life Nta�gh minimiang tLeir disabiliti�s. A Rule 36 [�idattial facility does this by provi�ng a Iess reslriclive environment than that ot t�e state bospital. To do this it o(fers hvo caro levels: 1. Hig6er oamber ot staff empbyees b resides4. I6{!OM �Fb00�! piyt�Oj�[iI Werap7. L Semi-indepeoAent nv4onmrnt tLat iuvola�es oa4a(-hoose mmtal Aea1N sen�ices anA transiWn ieloa Job. The [acility in Moka County will use Irvel one care Eecaux it's bem determined by Q�e Moka County Community Hralth and Social Servica Boatd W be fhe mast needed levd of care at this time in Ne camty. Stang said ttut tevel one care wil] provide start and Iw�g term psychofogicaf lherapy fmm Eo� fu tE ontfis. depending on nch case. � For most clients, bills for uu ol the lacitity's therapy p�o�ams and toom s� board wi0 De paid through aid trom tbe state, couaty and (ederal levels of eovernmmt. Climts will receive aid baxd on menul hrsith disability aod ec000mic staha. People that are able W pay tor such care generally go inW pricate facilitin, Hausaid. • Propoxal o[ the [acility last year wu prompted by a 1984 study conducted by the Moka County Commwity HeaIN and Social Services Board, an advisory board W the munty board It tound such needs have been increasing, but ehe demand had not been met. But witb people becoming aware a� more receptive W services, the demand has incrc.ued. Speci(nlly, Hus and Stang said that it found levd one carc was needed most. Io making Nis deierminatiaf, Hass aod Stang said that tbe 6oard worked with Ne Moka State Hospital, Maey and Uoity Medical Ceaten, Moka McKnight Consortium. dafa [rom Anoka County Social Sernces adult case lwds, plus mental health advocato. As cluirwoman o( Ne Community Hea�th and Sacial Scvim Board. Hau aaa a major peomoter tor the facillry along witb the board itxl( that included eounty rnmmisaionen Paul McCarron and Margaret langfeld aad concerned citizw. Haas said that wch a hcility wss not pnopusal u rigorauly in the past because therc au �wt a need for this type � care u therc is today. Public awareneu of such proWems. plua resources. also were not available in the past. Becauu o[ incrcased sta[e funds, more resourers Lavebecomeavaila6le. � Dakota Counry has a Rule 76 faciliry for menWlly iD adults t6at provides care at level two. Hennepin County has sevaal facitities. Anoka County's site for its �rst facility has yM to be sdected. >�s� � � R� > s a � R��3 �_�3�s�g��3� °s� ��'$°�fe^�' 33'P3^"4,.e�� Q1� £—�.��E,�.�3�� s��ri C$$:$��33�0isEs� e �� a�"3��a��>�: g�•n �=:—�-o�� . f q < O y � ��. �� n � �^ �$�-e� ��R3��,a�a�~�'«� 'SA G+ 3� ^ R O � m S•� —'m �Y 3a�... �3^ �m.�o�g $'H• 69q�, _=q saNx?� e:�a'a Q� ° �,� m_ �=m o'—' <.� 3 Qg � �SGn � S�a. S. � i�i. � �e a � �� 3g � � '= m ' = �� A'�$ ` � w�S X ��o'�°<a^t� cg^gn�a�` a�gg�:e"R�°-'� K r•� �:� � e � � $ an 3 �-°� � �� a ��'� �.Gm a�o�� =�.3e'��-SU, .��<.E=��a3.'-"�mo<m� '°+°^,g��3Rn$ 00oa�.o'a3°3�'�c �'�"''e'CE"�a�3 ^��m a' ��= n°�..°n�o��i�n �37Z3 v e�.n ,� � e � - °-^$7'i'�-'e� 3n- e $^. - ^^<.��mS&''3°' aA3n ° �m� �c ° a`� �''c � $ '� � � m � ?' c e �_ e � =� 7 np ° ^ '� e � � � S a � —S n ^� � m 1� � � m S `e! m � �Of � � ? � R�� Y f0 ^ n w S� n m ; A W �na wgm�_ �jeee� o �..E � �'e % e 3 co, � � n. � $ � g m F��n ?: men ge�� 3 ��:� �a�a�3 ,: E�$n��O�gn �a�'2�a �'`$3S�3o�°�°�+8 ��;Gt,�,'S�, ��Ssrsm�w��Q,�a3 OS O^ �.��nPS� a..�CO �'�J� �� W��nOSin�E�� n�n La �n �eg'S�°c.°.?*'_ ;a� �� g��3��°s�: �: 3=�3A�8�R��A ' 3� � a,m-e;;��m�,�� 3 �o °£"�3��cAASE�A K3 $3 �a�3-��;;��?'° � 3� � n gm'� ��• �'° 4�Rn'os��a 4�a'$.� �A eq� � i � w ��'" 6r^ �'e ? = i�i!' �=°a o pi �$ � A = V'V-w•=iC'�L�Z��!�S]. � �• �� i O � � � � � �• �� A� -Y � � � � � O � � � � � � � � � > m n z � ro > � m H m � � PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Pla�ning Commission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Aveneu Northeast on Wednesday, April 3, 1985 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 P.M. for the purpose of: Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP N85-02 by Robert Anderson, per Section 205.07.1, 3, A, of the Fridley City Code, to allow the construction of a second accessory building, a 24 foot by 26 foot detached garage, on Lot 13, Block 3, Brookview 2nd Addition, the same being 6800 Oakley 5treet N.E. Any and all persons desiring to be heard sha11 be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. Vi�GINIA SCHNRBEL CHAIRWOMAN PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: March 18, 1985 March 25, 1985 17 y1�1a5 CITY OF Fp1OLQY� � �SJECi •�» UNIVEAi1TY /Nt. NL SPECIAL USE PERMIT sw�o�Er, w+. s�.�e is� s�+-a+so � sP � d'�so,— �ss � � a�A�L � �S � �►�� - 7 � � � PLANNIN6 COhMISSION: APPROYED DISMPROYEO OATE �7 ��'� N0. I CITY C4l�lGIl: . APPROYED DISAPPROYfD DATE NO STIPULATIONS: STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY LEGAL OESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY u FEE �O0 � RECEIPT NO /57a�� e PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION�fXISTING llSE OF PROPERTY�� ACREAGE OF PROPERTY DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE SPECIAL USE�ADDLIED FOR: � �. 2 U � �C 2G � Section of the Lode: 01 (> S, d"Z / � A, ,.— � rd �� Has the present applicant previously sought to rezone. plat, obtain n lot split or variance or specinl use permit on the subject site or part of it? __�yes no. What was requested and when? _ The undersigned understands that: (a) A list of all residents and owners of pro�er- ty within 20D feet wili be attache6 to this application� '' - � � '(b) This application must be S�gned by a11 owners of the property. or an expianation jiven wtiy this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for ar�y ,fefect in the proceedings resutting from the faiture to • list the names and addresss of atl residents and property owenrs of propRrty in question, belongs to the undersigned. A sketth of proposed property and structure �nust be drawn and attached, showing the fotlawing: 1. North direction. 2. Location of the proposed structure on the lot. �. Oi�ensions of property, proposed structure. and fron and side setbacks. 4. Street names. 5. location and use of adjacent existing buildings (within 35D feet}. The undersigned hereby decla�es that all tfie facts and tAis application are true and correct. � dITE � ' % `f� S SIGNATUR I respresentations stated in /� � 3 ys� ADDRESS (o ,(' 6� " ��'"� L � � - � � TELEPHONE NO S� � ��--� % i SP N85-02 Robert Anderson for a second accessory building at 6800 Oakley Street N.E. Mr. b Mrs. Roger Patton 682� Brookview Drive N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. 8 Mrs. Bryce Shimmon 6810 Brookview Drive N.E. fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Richard Schoen 68�� Brookview �rive N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth Strand 6801 Oakley Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 J Dee & R Ferguson 6811 Oakley Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Hazel Saba 6821 Oakley Street N.E. fridley, MN 55432 Martin Lueders 6831 Oakley Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Carl Wenzler 6830 Oakley Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Donald Crispin 6820 Oakley Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. 8 Mrs. James Brubakken 6610 Oakley Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. S Mrs. Robert Anderson 6800 Oakley Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. 8 MrS. Donald Boyer 999 Pandora Drive Fridley, MN 55432 19 Planning Commissioi.March 15.1�$� Mr. & Mrs. Herman Heath 991 Pandora Drive N.E. fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. David Yahanda 981 Pandora Drive N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. 8 Mrs. Thomas Rocheford 971 Pandora Drive N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. 8 Mrs. Ronald Nisbet 990 Pandora Drive N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. 8 Mrs. James Bruder 969 - 68th Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. 5 Mrs. Andrew Percic 1020 - 68th Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Ardell Marcus 1010 - 68th Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. � Mrs. Francis Nash 1000 - 68th Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. 8 Mrs. Kenneth Vos 990 - 68th Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Raymond Gerrety 1051 - 67th Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Andrew Percic 1050 - 68th Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. Wallace E. Haller 831 - 40th Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, MN 55A21 NIYCORA�EA — � r .'. I _`� ZA sc� s I , � . � �, �s ' � ,. ' .J . � � � _ � 1 T i � � i��`/ . � �� 1 ci Ow�✓� i I 4 A 7 �,�►. ��/ . '\c (/tI0% � ,��rsMi � �"li � � �1►- �r r' G/� j I..Ne� .P �� •� . ` � � ,C �i " O /w..i �ywi,� rI , IOiI �{ i � t . � 2 � , �tD° �� / y �p\\ � I � • O� 'L ,. 3 � _ I �� • / _ ' \ W �! �� 1lo S b�,� �� ao��4 P r,..s, .,,n, }` 4"�� '1, : ,• �''r CE . .. , ,, ~� g~• • ,� R�C ,• � � .. , , R A ` ` • " i� ' � , �DI _ J� � � � .' f �'�r'`•� �..Ir•ij{.�ri� . I �. � � � �� " �.\O� {08B ; •y� �. ` •n � .��' �° C R E E K �,Ps� 3 � , �� , . ` ' r,+�� » �odd•� 2 ti;.�; '' � � �V A .r � � � � r �-•- . 7 - � r�� . ` ,'.e... ` Q � j � ?�1 � � � �i '��':`` �s�o , � I O •�0' ' HI N�e t��? i lD�o � . 6 � � ��t . ''o � > � �� z t 1 ` c � � * �� 1 5ti �i�r � i Q� vo°�', �:� y�y �,� _a�� ; �s ''� � ��e. �, �e�o ' I ' � 9�f � °�/ M� � Ri„�, � � ~ 0 + �s� C �•� .• lB ''.� �� iNl �blo . � I . e O. . "� �:� r/1%� i• . '� / 7 10 • . '•� '�L� , � � B I i ' / 2t�I � � • �� `� ±7 � pO /- ia31` �a30 i I r i � i y �� •,.l ,~� Z 1� � !1({.� Lffe 1V l N � . < < (.a/� 7 �M �s:o ��:� 6�=p ` j ; � � �vAt -�+,. � n �: ,o ' t _ ¢ � � /3 � e � 11t `� � W 6��•► ir.�r � j li: ., -_r,.er � _ �eio ��,`�,. �� ; 's J /t � /� I �D 1 t I ;1 � n � ti`�' _ -`6oc �o" � �'" � p ,� • �s a ��+� � �, �' �-' � r 3 e, � 97 ° 2 , � , � , ,� . T M 1 � ..�._____i�w � 7 •AI��r� e.ls« � � , i} •'� { 6 � -• . _ . � --�: H. .E�.. : .::. Q , 2 '.� * � .... ,... .. « . r � , � , � r . � r �e: � ; 3 t i �13� �`°"_ � i = _• � �• t s� f j ; _ •r1 4. s� • ., ?. � ' • • , (7�i i� ;' j' »p Ipp0�q�0 �, � I � � � � � ' w � .i—»t. �-- � � � _ � � � � �r'! � � . . � M�. , ��,�T,• � "� � • fs�' i• + I � i ; , �� J� .. s x , , e� � , Z � } �'"� t .� ! 1 atl WSI q�� ;1 � `�� .. _ .. � > � u°q1 _�?�, b7.v1 AV. ME I, � 8f� 1 � y „- .: � �„ � - - .�- y 4 ..K.._ : � ��s, �,�,.�,s` ; �• Z `� > ' u'S �;,� r....> > � : � � - ,p c ' ', ~ �(„�d � i �� !� �Vuoa � ---��._. ; t : �� 5 LOCATiON MAP .' ' � y" �� - —K . � •��Y� � � � � � . . ' �M�1/ �'� :_ _ J z i �" i� z � J �` 1 —L V � Q I T1� � � T 1,, ,\ �� 's'='''� � /�s�..�-- �'� �� ::A �1.F�'• S"' .5 71- 1'3Y5' h T t � �� 1 J � �' I J I w i3 � p.�f,:.a ♦�.a. c�r ,(9riG� r P�1 ' � � i-. � . \ _ 1--. . _` ; ,. �. � � G � �� / 1 U � � r �-. � �� y 13l� GtTY OF FR►DLEr. SU9JECT 6�]l IJNIVEASITV I�VE. Ni. Fr+�o�Er, MN. 6�'C ��,671-�450 ZONING ALTION VACATION PLAT 22 ZOA M � SAV N S� o t PS N_ ! ORDINANCE NO PUBLISHED ADDRESS Dl►TE PLANNING CAiMISSIQN: APPRQYEO DISAPPROVED DATE N0. CITY OOUNCIL: PUBLIC HEARING DATE 1ST READ 2ND READ CITY COUNCIL: APPROVED OISAPPROYED DATE NO DARK FEE REQIlIRED: AhqUNT PAID STIPULATIONS: NAME Arnold A' Kuhnlv FEE 150.0� RECEIPT NO��'7 STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY 6747 Wasrineton St N E Fr'��lav. Mn LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Lot 1 and the Southerl 2 Feet Front ofRLot 15 PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION - I EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY ACREAGE OF PROPERTV DESCRIBE BRIEFLY TNE PROPOSED ZONING CLASSIFICATION OR TYPE OF USE AND IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED Vacate the�draina e and utilit �, a,,1� ,��- i� ,� easement on the North Side of Lot 14 in order to install a driveway and erect a garage on the rear of the lot. Has the present applicant previously sought to rezone, plat, obtain a lot split or variance or special use permit on the subject site or part of it? __yes�no. What was requested and when? The undersigned understands that: (a) A list of all residents and owners of proper- ty rithin 356 feet must be attached to this application (rezoni�g), 3Q0 feet, (plat- ti�g), wj1J be attached to'this applSCation. '(b) This application must be si9ned by all ow�ers of the Droperty, or an explanation cjiven why this is not the case. (cj Responsibitity for any defect in the proceedings resulting from the failure to list the narre s and addresss of all residents and property owenrs of prop�rty in questi0n, belongs to the undersigned. A sketch of proposed property and structure must be drawn and aYtached, showing the folla+ing: 1. North direction. 2. Location of the proposed structure on the tot. 3. Dime�sions of property, proposed strutture, and fron and side setbacks. 4. Street names. 5. Location and use of adjacent existing buildings (within 350 feet). The undersi�ned hereby declares that all the facts and respresentations stated in this application are true and correct. DA7E 3'6—$5 l.;C.%��j �� — - � v T`arch 6, 1935 I have lived at 67L7 Washington 5t., since July 19:;, and in all that time I have never seen the easement on t::e North side of my lot used for any purpose. If any utilit; vehicles have needed to get to the rear of my lot, the•y have always come in at the South End of my house. The onl}- instances I can recall of that are after the tornado in 1>-E5 and a couple of times when they were installing cable ;V. The utility pole is at the South end of m}� lot and all electrical and phone wiring is above ground. A=_ far as drainage is concerned ther is practic�ll}• ne run—o�f between my house an� the one to the Nert:. of ine. i • ;- / - �.- f� `� '% _r; ;; r._ %/",/-,=_`; ` � V Northwestern Be�� Mlarch 14, 1985 ��ty of Fridley Planning Dept. 6431 U��versity A�e• N' E' Fridley, MK 5`�32 R�; Vacation Request SAV #85-02 This area is served by aerial telephone cable from the rear lot lines. Vacating this easement wo�ld have no adverse effect on our facilities. Sincerely j, �, Thistle En9}neer-Distribution 'Utility Company Ye have a Yacation Request, SAV /85-02. from Rrnold Kuhnly to vacate � the 7 foot drainage and utility easement. If you have utilities in tAis easement and tAis vacation would have an adverse effect on this easement, please notify the City of Fridley Planning Department at 6431 University Avenue N.E.. Fridley. MN 55432 as soon a possibie. .�'t� 7�S /° �y�r 'B' '�"'y' : ,''� _ 1 - � _ � _�� . �'c�� t�zFica,te : ._� .. z � : � ��J � ,"r\ � < <J l ,; •� � \ •1 -� .� `'► � \� � �� v :_: � �.�,�,,,� � �-�---� O� �u=�e� �i! �V,<-'••`��LIJ ��i/i- l ,�l� . \. � ,t� t �� . ) \�' ,, ` ` ' ' � `f �� t� �� '. � R �� ,�. Y } � � '•. : '� ti� �� 4 i• Z �t� t' 0 ' �ti v � { C ` ti . •� ,� S � r. ;' �'�� 'e �'' :� . . '`�' � • ; :` � r, � �3� ,• z�... . !� � +!� �f4 �� ', r � i P � Y � � � ' � �r �v�. . „ : ' � 0 • . ��7,, �� -:� � � , r+ r � �-� �� v ` ��" } � i, hJ' � y��7-� ' _ _ � r �� / 4 `�J :1 ,ti � 'yi�'� ',�-- :: !1, �?j � � �a � , ,'= � �; �� . v,; : ; � �� . �� • '. • . � ti :, �; ; � � � � . i 1 25 � . _ �_ � • `a.t • � ;;. � I y. ot /'. � ir ',(-- __.�_ ^��.'�__'__ _'� al �� \ �i•� wM/•yY�' / . � t __%�J�Q�—G�l•Jf,7Viiv;r � �� • �,..-.wc,A•. c .,, ' � - _!l/4 -�It:J T:�� fC-:�Tf/l—.P�'Y � �L—� 7 F��c.:yVT ,. .-':{� _��►0 /,��;'1�P C�/= LUT /i, �L::L;� � . --� �-> r� C/2� C/� T'=!%P/-�C'L= P�T 4 �� , �Nf� .:. �� `�,, M�S s. ht d,r m..:d �rtsea�o�;.� ,�'. s�.-r�r P�' a..�aKflti��"�t �ea. �tru,ara o�e,..d T da :f4�v�e1r+��.bf:�.l�na...s�.sr's4i�a+vvxh.o�i,�'y.Fanrnrs�sraieArr�.x�n/��+t/1a� riy s � at�! :� y� . � �►�. - .� . . . StlduRBMI ENGlN£EQIVG. MC. � ;� y �`� � l.�f�., . -- t - --� - . . _ ._�....__ _.._.. . .-. -�_ _— - --' �-- ._..�..... EC. !4, T. 30, R. 24 r oF fRiocEr i/ � � , `�: �w rw� ... .n » , � ' .`,_;. t,i�� ; �� . ' •� � - j4 �,t '� " , . i RICE � . 4�(�. � ,. n � F' � � r- R ' �t.t.�,.e! .. s � i V'. . �,. y'�'. 'J... • i_i w� u�. - � � •ti1..bJv�� .�.�� T ." � � , :.�. .� ►:: . r' .f�,� � ,_�i� •. ° ��Qt.-.- . .3 v ,� 26 �KSy�iO`�.-•O Y.<'�.�f. I � �T �r.0 r^ �.r. � rp•.�r� �, ir,«,�..�,,�.„.«.,.,�.,, , -.a �...,,,c �s �c r ,iu' w�• rr ., ■�uewc� nrw us •.- r.� c a+ � n n ..o� rv'•,va� ,�. .•.. ,e I KCW:'� FIMr C?MiM= 5j9/4 .tro..r. u: ,. •BR�QKV/EW� . 1.� � ;y; .� C�CER �:t ,TE�IUCf ' �. � �, . �i � . t i � .i.�i..� • 1 r { � ' • � j • t , �: �.C.. ' ' ' '__ � ' f .�_;_;.-. r�r-.. �, .� '- •��T�RRA�E•:..,.-�s.; '�,=r. . : .-.,. _ :, :'�., ; , � r.�oa. �-- oRnc —_ , .-.. r. ,,•.� .V:s��.'`� . � .� :�nE.1.1-��i t'1•� �i..';;�ti i�+/ � �' �.; ,� ,: ,- 5�:, ° ------�.:: •- 5 � -_-�;::•�'.r�- ` �,� . � : � ,• �- � � � i � / \ . � r � •� 1 � t n t I B � � � . e ` n � �. I ` � �:: � � %i �.� ��'i" ' � / � �. ti�.`� . • ... ` • � � � i` =� �2� - � n � • � ceTa+ o�� (� -. I-- �3 4 •: i� -•.�� t'/ � a_ li��'O:•ViN�01/( •:`� !.��.� � : � ' �. � ` � � �°� � : ' � � • �: �. ��. ,Z�,,�� ~_ .�� ..'; . � FF , —�i .g�t��A��E�•'i°,,; ' , � ' , � � _ - . '.;s� v \ O .` � � 1 � � � � �� : 6CMM�STOM � ' � . R7' ` Q . ✓� ' r f. i ! � +.�^ � �v' ,i� , • % ~ t � . ' � : � • 1 r t . ; � e � S � 1 i 7 '�, � �� ti . .i rh - � �' � r � �I I� '-=y .�._,/� !I�",.'Q-�...•-.� �' z— " ••� A• �r ,ti. �� . ` . +' is •� .��•si.`..�•.1 .�s`•. t.. : �: i . �' .+.�'� � `, • r �R Z` � .. .. � ,'X . �<�. . 4 f % '� �� l �. q�w �vf M f • �- • . � -�`� -�t�, ; _ � ; � • i : : ' ' ' ' 14 t� ` , wV -=..�`� ; ` " � _r.' -• �;AIE WLANbS . <r V� • T � ..�. i` ny �. � �'� t � �' f i � ..� ...:. _ � . ` � � � - • ` . �' � a � ' ..f%' .. n i �� . � i ■ • �- ' 6�� - � - ,. . - q�. , t . � g - _ ; . � .. :!`_ = W• = �� [I s_� u � � � • P �� ,� � � u Y . `• � i � • ' ~ ) • t .. . . 1 / A� M . 1 �� 1 • • �i , l� � a � � � � ♦ � / �.r Q ! f � a � ,�:_ � . _-_+c _- � . � . � �: � . _ . �. - F - W f� �ta , \ •:'� � �. � ��. ; r� r � f � W Q/ � � �� ^ �� `� � � s � H�6 B. ` � i,s� 1 f a �. � /E MI � . ` • ` - t^; � N,i.. � n� / . ��•: __.._ .. / n� �) . 1 �\ r{ i\ s � ��s 5 s1ilif �i, , . . �. ., . � ' � � �s,�' bwEl� ' : 4 � y a " R 111. F � � ,•~ �EEx. ° • � • � a ; . �q.g �:-� �r►� ^ : y , - . .�E � c , • ,... � - " y� ,...E�E -..�_.. � � - �� 8 MEADpW�qjVQS I[ M.E • " .- • • :A� Q � . � . ' �'r-�� + M�YES 5�� y " �. - :' � ..,� � � ssTN �vE ` a . �` . A�R . ^r..... i . j s iy-� .t ` � �: � i ♦ � r ]z ' q.c � � ( . t , i .�E�iR,�C� • ="' P��d�l Y. �' c�ovc i �, 1 _. _; ., .1 , � � , , � , � � kY%d�%is%/i� ... � ' -� • ;dv�. � F ° � � . r • �i� �.. . a .w�-...• '•' _--ipl[�� YISSISS:i4L-3TREE'f � . �+ _' •-� �� •u" ��ro�r i�t • r�l f(t ' • fOI�MD W •MD[fSOM„ - \ � `� .6CQM'�.SUrrf�n� LOCATION MAP �v � v/ � �.* ,\ y� � I _ `� ' � � ' � . J \ \ , ` I ` �1 �� li ,S,- \ ��l �RC.� �•��J . '% �� .�v_i° Y i' �7 • / � � � t,y le' ' '� .` �\ ./ . �+�~ .�> ,� ` yA� C' V� 4� � , � � � � � ^ � ' �1 p �y r 9 � n � ,p �J �h t � n �/ ry r �c co � C� G f—=— � � � i 0 � �o 25 � , ��- _ 5 �I 0 � - . "" ,� � � h/ D � . � 7 � � . n " •1 r r. � 1 , '� N�L � ' . . � � � �1' —I +1 � �. _ ' � c'�c, a �� I o , „, e �. � i � E. � � � -/ � . _ � � � � �\ �� C�� . � � �_ _ `' ! � ��'�,_ � � _ � . � /� �, _ �.? � � � � .� � � , . Z A _ ^ 3�� c . Q ` ° nC� --- .- -- � �.� _�"< ' � + � ~ o _ ff1/ N .�+ 5 � � o N p 6 �� . � .��.� - � - � r • V/ • N _ _ —.— L � o � , � � O r • W = � I •a r N i '� , �/� d� �� v ��i9 1� y 9 �A3 / �1 � � x_.-s s rr r VJ .. • � : %. ° s n' �-' � �-=-:z -��.� _ s ---� � :.-�� __ .-. � -- ! _ . '— o' b' A 6�_ y�o .� �... , �� 3 �►� � �: - �: � � : � • -9 8 `� • /� .;� T ^•' � �, -� • (� •,+.i� . � � ,• ` i R� -T•' 41 .: � � �r p _ 1 �•^ . � � ' '�, : �� d � . .-�::. _ •i ?' _ . . - Ge '- � -- - r. . — - _ �' .J� .~'* ,. ..; � ' _ .-� '�_A`��. � ' �' ,..,. . ' . � j :,, ' - .': .• _ - • � * r %� , . ty •� � .•i " R r �a ) I ' -•i+.ws-a �1• i 7�{��=•��I/�JF-�n :.t'��',. �' � � �^i 'i-�� .�1 i � ,�� ' i' � K� 3 r !,� _ S'.t,: . t: '} .I ' �. t{ � � .'i� � .: � :� �`.� � Sr�, .'°�.y'�, �,y,. . �r,�..' ' --- .+.� _. ' �:' t'�� •. 1��+. ,•'�>C.i •• �: � : '. .; : _ . . � - � ' � • ( . . . --=--�1llM(' � R- 14123? ' _ . _ CITY OF FRIDLEY HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 7. 1985 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Minton called the March 7, 1985, Human Resources Commission meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Bob Minton, Peter Treuenfels, Barbara Kocher, Harold Belgum Mer•ibers Absent: None Others Present: Bill Hunt, Administrative Assistant APPROVAL OF JANUARY 31. 1985, HUMAN RESOURCES LOMMISSION MINUTES: NOTION BY MR, TREUENFEZS� SECONDED BY MS. KOCHER� TO APPROVE THE JAN. 32� 2985, HD�4AN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON MINTON DECLARED THE MOTION CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY, APPROVAL OF AGENDA: MOTZON BY MR. TREUENFELS, SECONDED BY MS, KOCHER� TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS SUBMITSED, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON MINTON DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRZED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. INTRODUCTION OF NEW COMMISSION MEt9BER, MR. HAROLD BELGUM: Mr. Minton welcomed Mr. Belgum to the Commission and introduced him to Mr. Treuenfels and Ms. Kocher. 2. OLD BUSINESS: a. Consideration of Grants to Human Service Organizations from CDBG Funds (1} 1983 Mr. Hunt stated he has had quite a few discussions with Jo Ann Wright, Anoka County Cortenunity Development Coordinator, who clarified a number of questions regarding CDBG funds. HUHAN RESOURCES COMMISSION �EETiNG, PoARCH 7, 1985 PAf,E 2 Mr, Hunt stated the grant years generally run for 18 months beginning July 7 of the grant year, so the 1983 grants must normally be spent by the end of 1984; the 1984 grants must be spent by the end of 1985, etc. He stated, however. that because there was some confusion regarding the grant monies, the County Board passed a resolution extending the 1983 grants to Aug. 21, 1985. In other words, grantees have until Aug. 21 of this year to spend the money. Mr. Hunt stated the 1983 grant m�ney was approximately $17,000. He stated he has written letters to the organizations asking for certification that the money was actually spent for the purposes given. Three out of four of tfie organizations did give the City certification, so t�e City aill be reimbursed for that money. The fourtfi organization, the Fridley Senior Center's program never got off the groud, so the $4,150 has been returned to the City of Fridley, Mr. Hunt stated the City can still distribute the $4,150 as long as the money is spent before Aug. 21, 1985. He stated the Senior Citizen Advisory Board will be meeting later this month, and they p�an to resubmit another proposal to the City for the April Co�nission meeting. He stated this did not mean the City could not make the allocation to another organization. Mr. Minton stated he felt that as long as the money was dedicated to the Fridley Senior Center, they should have a chance to reapply, Mr. Treuenfels stated he disagreed with Mr. Minton. Because the time was short, he would prefer to have them notify the various organizations that there was the possibility of additional fundinq from the 1983 CD66 monies. Then the Commission would have several proposals to cho�se from. Mr, Hunt stated the Senior Outreach Program, Central Center for Family Resources, and SACA were the other three organizations who were funded with the 1983 monies. He stated they did not fund 100% of what those organizations requested, so if these organiza- tions could show that those additional funds were needed, it was possible they could receive additional monies. Mr. Minton stated the Commission would proceed as follows: Priority #1: The Commission wilt wait for the proposal from the Fridley Senior Citizen Center. Priority #2: Mr. Hunt will contact the other three organiza- tions by telephone to tell them of the possi- bility of additional funds and to get a commit- ment from them that if the monies were availab?e, they would be able to utilize the money by Aug. 21, 1985. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING; MARCH 7, 1985 PAGE 3 Mr. Minton stated the Commission would make a decision on the $4,150 at the April meeting, to be forwarded on to the City Council on April 15. (2) 1984 Mr. Hunt stated the 1984 grant money was a little over $17,000. The Cit,y Council approved the allocation of those funds on Feb. 4, 1985� and the monies have to be spent between Feb. 4 and Dec. 31, 1985. He stated he had drafted a letter for the Commission's review and approval that would go to the organiza- tions funded which clarified the manner in which the funds would be paid out. Instead of the whole amount being expended at once, it will be expended in thirds. Mr. Hunt stated anotf�er thing he had learned from Ms. Wright was that proposals cannot be submitted for construction, so the park- ing lot for The Alexandra House did not qualifv for 1984 fundinq. Since the City did not designate a percentage of money to go to construction but did designate 10% to human services, grant monies cannot be expended to The Alexandra House for the construction of the parking lot. Mr. Hunt stated The Alexandra House pe�ple are planning to resubmit a new proposai for the $3,200. He anticipated the Cortmission would have the new proposal for the April 4th meeting. The Commissianers reviewed and approved the ietter drafted by Mr. Hunt. (3) 1985 Mr. Hunt stated that because there was some misunderstanding at the Feb. 4 City Council meeting, the City Council has asked that the Human Resources Commission give them more information regarding the funding recommendations and that the Commission treat all organi- zations the same--either al] organizations or none make presentations. Mr. Minton stated Councilman Goodspeed had stated he felt it was very important to give all the organizations the opportunitv to give a presentation to the Human Resources Commission. Mr, Hunt stated it might be necessary to just have one Comnission meeting for hearing presentations. This would come after the Comnission had received and reviewed all the proposals. Mr. Minton stated he felt the Commissioners had done a very con- scientious job in reviewing the proposals and making recortmendations, They had criteria and they had used those criteria. HU�1AN RESOURCES CONMISSIOPI MEETING, MARCH 7, 1985 PAGE 4 Mr. Hunt stated that maybe next year, the Commission Should �rrite a letter to the City Council giving a step-by-step account of what was done and how the Comnissioners arrived at their decisions, Mr. Minton stated it would be important next time that when reasons come up among the Commission members, that the,y take more time and challenge each other's reasons in order to come to concise conclusions. Mr. Hunt stated that partly because of the City Council's concerns, he had reorganized the "CDBG Grants" goal in the work plan in order to make the procedure very clear. Mr. Hunt stated f�e would like to get the annoucements out in March inviting proposals for 1985 CDBG monies. b. Consideration of Disaster Preparedness Mr. Treuenfels stated he had nothing to report as he had not received any information from Mr. Turnbull. Mr, Minton asked Mr. Hunt to ask Mr, Turnbull to give the Commission a status report on disaster preparedness for the next meeting. c. Consideration of 1985 Work Plan MOTION BY MR. TREUENFELS� SECONDED BY.�MR. BELGUM� TO ADOPT THE 1985 WORIC PLAN AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE� CHAZRPERSON MINTON DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANZMOUSLY. d. Consideration of Speed Limits and Crosswalks on Nighways 47 and 65 Mr. Hunt stated the Comnission members had asked for some information on where the more dangerous intersections were in Fridley. He stated he had brought some photographs and some slides from the Police Dept. that showed all the accidents in Fridley. As the Commissioners could see from the photographs, the most dangerous intersections were the major ones along Highway 47 and 65. Mr. Hunt stated that if the Cortmission m�nbers wanted, he could get some documentation from the State as the State does put out an analysis of all the streets. The Commissioners agreed this was a good idea and would like Mr. Hunt to request that type of data for the last ten years. HUHAN RESOURCES COt�1MISSION MEETTN6, MARCN 7, 1985 PAGE 5 3. NEW BUSINESS: a. Consideration of Poverty in Fridley Mr. Hunt stated he had tried to contact Steve Klein from Anoka County CAP, but had not been able to reach him, He stated he would attemut to have either Mr. Klein or someone else from Anoka County CAP come to the next meeting to talk a6out poverty in tfie City of Fridley. Mr. Minton stated he wanted to stress again that he would like the information to be Fridley-specific and dwell on problems rather than services. b. Other New Business (1) Fridley Ethnic Days, March 29-30 Mr. Belgum stated that in addition to the City being involved in the Fridley Ethnic Days this year and the Community Schools, the Rotary Club was asked to help with it and voted $2,000 of its own rtaney to help with the promotion of the Fridley Ethnic Days. Mr, Belgum stated he has been interested in ethnic backgrounds for some time; in fact, some years ago, he directed a program for the Bicentennial where they went around and did eight "ethnic eveninqs" honoring America, the Nation of Nations. These were held in the eig4�t senior high scfiools in Anoka County. The programs were taped and are on record at t6e public library. Mr. Belgum stated he remembered at the time finding 50 different identifiabte ethnic clusters or characteristics in Anoka County. Mr. Belgum stated he has made a hobby of askinq around and has found some very interesting people in the City af fridley xfth ver.v interesting ethnic backgrounds. Mr. Belgum read a letter from Mr. Gustave Doty, President of the Rotary Club, inviting certain people to participate in an inter- view series conducted by students of an anthropology class at Anoka Ramsey Community College. A student would come to that person's house for a one hour interview and would ask such questions as: Why did your ancestors leave the Old Country and imnigrate to the USA? Why did they go to certain places in the U.S.? How did they meet and marry? What lines of work did they pursue..same as their ancestors..new lines? Mr. Belgum stated he did not have anything specific to propose at this time. He just wanted to bring this to the Commission's atten- tion and see what they thought. HU��AN RESOURCES COPIMISSION MEETIN6; MARCN 7, 1985 PAfE 6 Mr. Treuenfels stated he woiild be interested in what contributions the various ethnic people could make to an American community such as Fridley. He stated it would be interesting to ask some of tfiese people with ethnic backgrounds the following question: In what ways, if any they can remember, do tfie behaviour patterns and value systems from the home country differ from America? Mr. Belgum stated that since next year will be the ceremony for the restored Statue of Li6erty, it would be interesting if the Comnission could come up with some type of project. Mr. Minton stated this was certainly an appropriate subject for this Commission. Mr. Belgum stated the Minnesata Historical Society has people whose job it is to go to communities to help them with their history. It might be interesting to invite someone from the Minnesota Historical Society to a Comnission meetinq, Mr. Minton stated it would be helpful to have some information on the camposition of ethnic backgrounds in Fridley or how many first- 9eneration people there are in Fridley. Mr. Minton stated discussion should be continued until the next meeting, and the Comnissioners should give this subject some thought. ADJ011RIJMENT: MOTION BY MR. TREUENFELS, SECONDED BY MR. BELGUM, TD ADJOURN TXE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON MINTON DECLARED TNE MARCX 7� 1985� HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEESING AA70URNED AT 8:47 P.M. Respectfully submitted, yn a a� Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEY HOUSIt�G & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING MARCH ]4, 1985 CALL TO ORDER: Chairoerson Commers called the March 14, 1985, Housing & Redevelopment Authority meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. ROLL CALL: Menbers Present: Larry Comners, Elmars Prieditis, Carolyn Svendsen, Walter Rasmussen Members Absent: Duane Prairie Others Present: Nasim Qureshi, HRA Director Sid Inman, City Finance Director Dave Newman, City Attoi•ney Kent Richey, 0'Connor & Hannan Dick 6raves, Miller & Scfiroeder APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 14, 1985, NOUSINf & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MIfJUTES: MO?ZON BY MR. RASMUSSEN� SECONDED BY MR. PRIEDITIS, TO APPROVE THE FEB, 14� Z985, OIT lISING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYB�.CHAIRPERSON CQMMERS aECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNRNZMOUSLY, 1. COfJSIDERATION OF RESOLiITIQN N�. NRA 5-1985 AUTNORIZING THE DEVELOPMENT Mr. Qureshi stated that since the Aroposal for the 100 Twin Drive-in proeprty about a year ago, there was some concern that this intersection at West kloore Lake DrivelHighway 65/Old Central was already congested at certain times; and if there was going to be some sUbstantial development on tHis property, what additional impact would this have on the intersec- tion? At that time, the City Council authorized an initial preliminary study of the intersection and what improvements coulcl po5sibly be made to alleviate potential future traffic problems. That study was completed, presented to the City Council, the City Council held a public hearing noti- fying the neighborhood for input, and met with the two major property owners, the owner of the lOQ Twin Drive-in and Mr. Jerry Johnson,for their input. After the public hearing and meetings, the City Council dec'Lded on a plan that the City should be working with Anoka County and the State Highway Dept. to facilitate further development of the plans and the intersection. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITV �EETINf,, MARCH 1�, 1985 PAGE 2 Mr. Qureshi stated what was being brought to the HRA was essentially the development plan the City Council has approved in this area in a concep- tual way. After the NRA's approval, the City will go into more detailed plans which would require them to work out plans regarding what kind of right of way was needed, what kfnd of additional monies are going to be needed to include the intersection, and how the contribution between Anoka County, the 5tate, the HRA, and the City should be divided uo. Mr. Qureshi stated that at this time, he was requesting that the HRA authorize the approval of the plans in concept and authorize the City to enter into an agreement with the consultant to draw up the detailed plans. Mr. Commers asked how much money had already been spent on the study. Mr. Qureshi stated the study authorized by the City was $7,000, so the City has already paid $7,000. The proposal before the HRA was for the HRA to pay up to $30,000 for preparing tfie plans. Mr. Cormers asked if there was any reason why the NRA could not negotiate this cost with the City. Mr. Qureshi stated there was no reason why the HRA could not, but the City has already contributed a certain amount. Now the total impact of the development is creating this potential traffic situation; and, as the HRA knew, this was one of the reasons why tfie HRA created tfiese districts, They have not used any money up to now from the increments in this area. If the HRA is going to continue to collect increments, they have to start spend- ing money. That might be some justification for the need for this kind of activity; and, if there is a need, the HRA should start spending money so they can justify activity that retains their increment capa6ility. MOTION BY MS. SVENDSEN� SECONDED BY MR. RASMUSSEN� TO APPROVE RESOLUTION N0. NRA 5-1985� "RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE D$VEIAPMENT OF PLANS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT AND CHANNELIZATION OF THE TRUNK HIGHWAY 65 AND WEST MOORF, LAI� DRIVE/CENTRAL AVENUE INTERSECTION". Ms. Svendsen stated she would like to again request that the HRA receive the minutes of the City Council when the City Council has a public hearing or discusses an issue that the HRA will be dealing with in the future. UPON A VOICE VOTE� RLL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION N0. HRA 6-1985 PROVIDING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL , Mr. Canmers stated that, in addition to the information in the agenda, the HRA members had recetved at the meeting a memo from Sid Inman to Mr. Oureshi dated March 13, 1985, which apparently related to some correspondence and discussions with gob Ehlers relative to the appropriateness of the proposal. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETIpG, MARCH 14, 1985 PAGE 3 Mr. Inman stated he would continue to recommend that the HRA pass the Resolution because (11 Jt can be stopped within the next few days by the City Councilpr Housing and Redevelopment Authority; and (Z) He still thought it was the appropriate methodology for the Housing and Redeve3opment Authority. Mr. Inman stated the information was reviewed partially by Mr. Newman and himself last evening. Mr. Richey of 0'Connor & Hannan and Mr. Graves of Miller & Schroeder had worked on it that day. As stated in his cover memo, of three different proposals he has received, there was still a question of the legality of the method in which Mr. Ehlers is asking the City to evaluate. He had not had much opportunity to review the third or major proposal he had received from Mr. Ehlers only that afternoon, but he did know there were soMe definite mathematical errors in the ur000sal. Mr. Graves stated there was certainly nothing that couldn't be stonped if the HRA passed the resolution. Mr. Richey stated he could only address the legal issue as he understood it; he could not address the numbers or errors in the numbers. The legal issue that was raised by Mr. Bob Ehlers was whether or not the tax increments from Center City are locked up in the fund to pay off the bonds. It was their position that they would not be willing to agree that you can take those tax increments other than keeping them for exlsting bonds, which was perceived by the City to be a waste of increments. That opinion was con- curred by Dick Ehlers, wfio is the son of Bob Ehlers, and was associated with Ehlers & Associates, Dick Ehlers has left the firm and now Bob Ehlers has taken over the HRA's account. Bob Ehlers has now reviewed the matter and has come to a contrary conclusion from his son, Dick Ehlers. Bob Ehlers views the issue as follows: The bond resolution says that tax increments, including excess increments, shall be deposited in sinking fund which pays the bonds. Bob Ehlers somehow believes that that language doesn't say "tax increment", meaning all increments, but only excess increments, and that if it is excess increments, you can spend them all on something else before they become excess. Mr. Richey stated he found it difficult to follow Mr. Bob Ehlers' argument, but he did disagree with Mr. Ehlers' conclusion. He stated that was the legal issue being raised by Mr. Ehlers' memo which he had seen about an hour before this meeting. Mr. Richey stated the effect of Resolution No. HRA 6-1985 was to preliminarily authorize the refunding bonds, authorize staff to work with the bond counsel and underwriter to go forward, and to request the City to authorize staff as well. That did not mean the bonds are sold. The bonds cannot be issued without a final resolution from the HRA. At any time up until that voint, legally the HRA can prevent the bonds from being sold, If the HRA went that far, however, and made no conditions on the resolution, there could be an awkward situation for the HRA in that the underwriter could offer the bonds HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITV MEETIN6, HARCH 14, 1985 PAGE 4 to the market as indicatior of interest so that everybody thought the bonds were going to be issued, but when they came back for final resolution, the HRA said they were not going to issue the bonds. Nowever, what the HRA could do was put a condition on the resolution that the bonds cannot even 6e offered witfiout the consent of the HRA. Mr. Newman stated he also had some real problems with what Mr. Ehlers was trying to do. He stated that proceeding with the resolution would not hurt the HRA. MOTZON BY MR. RASMUSSEN� SECONDED BY MR, PRIEDZTIS� SO AMEND RESOLUTION NO. HRA 6-1985 TO ADD TXE STATEMENT TXRT THERE WILL BE NO OFFER OF BONDS UNTIL FURTXER APPROVAL BY THE HOUSIN6 & REDEVEZAPMENS AUTHORITY. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CNAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION BY MR. RASMUSSEN, SECONDED BY MS. SVENDSEN� TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. XRA 6-1985 AS AMENDED. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNRNIMOUSLY. The HRA agreed to instruct Staff that once Staff has the information from Miller & Schroeder and 0'Connor & Hannan that they give Mr. Ehlers three working days to respond. Once the resoonse is received from Mr. Ehlers, the HRA will call a special meeting. If Mr, Ehlers does not respond, the HRA will still move forward. 3. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION N0. HRA 7-1985 AUTHORIZING THE IMPROVEMENT OF S REE S . Mr. Commers stated he did not understand one statement in Mr. Flora's memo to Mr. Qureshi dated March 7, 1985: "Total cost of this improvement is estimated at $145,300.00 and $27,500.00 is to be assessed to the adjoining property owners." Mr. Qureshi stated they feel the investment originally made by the property owners, if properly protected, can be saved. The pronosal is not to tear up the existing street but to build on the existing road, widen it, and provide concrete curbing. They feel this improvement will be beneficial to th� total area of the redevelopment. Ms. Svendsen asked how much money would be assessed per property owner. Mr. Qureshi stated the cost per property owner was approximately $750. Ms. Svendsen stated she questioned whether it was necessar�y to assess the property owners at all. ! HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY h1EETING, MARCH 14, 1985 PAGE 5 Mr. Qureshi stated they way they justify the assessment was that the property owners were getting a high level of improvement. The Citv's standard is now to provide a5phalt paving and concrete .curbing. This street was improved before that standard was adopted so they would be bringing this street up to that standard. They were merely charging the homeowner the difference of the cost for the curbing alone. He stated the City Council has already approved this assessment. Public hearings were held, and the property owners had accepted this as a reasonable assessment. Mr. Comners stated he was not sure there should be an assessment to the property owners either. Mr. Prieditis stated he did not quite understand where the need was for this street improvement. Mr, Qureshi stated the existing road is in a shane that if they do some cosmetics and surfacing, they can save the existing 6ase and matte. The homeowners made an investment in their properties and the road. There is a high level of use and activity on this road. It was prudent to save that investment and build on it than to go back later and have to rebuild the whole road. Mr. Commers stated that 5th Street was a state aid road. Were there anv state aid funds available to help with this cost? Mr. Qureshi stated they could certainly apply for state aid funds. Mr. Commers stated he had a little bit of a problem in that all of a sudden this comes up, and there has been no input, no decisions, no information given to the HRA as to the priorities of the HRA's funds, where they should be spent, how necessary this was, what the homeowners think, and now the City is asking the HRA to fund it. Mr. Qureshi stated they have talked all along about the improvement on Mississippi St. and 5th St. and better traffic flow. They had a traffic study done, They have gotie through public input to make sure the public was reasonable acceptable to bearing some cost. He did not think there was any question as to whether the improvement should be done. If the question was whether the HRA should pay or the City pay, that was negotiable. Mr. Corrrners stated he was not saying this was not a good thing, and they shouldn't do it; but he was just a little concerned about the manner in which this has come up. He stated they discussed Mississippi St. and 5th St. in front of the Center City development, and the HRA stands ready to do what they have to there, but they have never discussed anything about 5th St. farther down a couple of blocks. Now all of a sudden, the HRA is being asked to pay the bill. Ms. Svendsen stated she really had some trouble assessing'the propert.y owners for this street improvement, A lot of people are not too appre- ciative of the plaza and now they are beinq told their street is part of the whole area and they have to pay $27,500. ,� HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORiTV MEETING, MARCH 14, 1985 PAGE 6 Mr. Rasmussen stated maybe they could get some other kind of help to pay the $27,500, rather than having the taxpayers pay that assessment. He felt they should take the burden off the taxpayers. Mr. Qureshi stated he did not have a problem with having State Aid pick up that share of the cost. MOTION BY MR. RASMUSSEN, SECONDED BY MS. SVENDSEN, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION N0, ARA 7-19Q5 WZTX TXE AMENDMENS THAT THE HRA WILL PAY SI45�300 OF TXE STH STREET IMPROVEMENT COST, COt7TINGENT UPON TRE PLAN THAT STATE AID PAY $27�500 SD THERE WILL BE NO ASSESSMENT TO THE PROPER2Y OWNERS. UPON A VOICE VOTE� RLL VOTZNG AYE, CXAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTIDN CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. APPROVAL OF AUDITOR FOR YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1984: It was the concensus of the HRA to approve the auditor, George M. Hansen Co., P.A., for tAe year ending December 31, 1984. 5. ESTIFIATE - RENOLLET TRUCKING FOR THE DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURE AT MOTION BY MR, RRSMUSSEN� SECONDED BY MR. PRIEDZTIS, TO APPROVE TXE PAYMEN2 TO RENOLLET TRUCKING IN THE AMOUNT OP S4�Z04 FOR THE DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURE AT MISSISSIPPF ST, AND UNII�ERSITY AVE. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6, CHECK REGISTER: MOTION BY MR, RASMUSSEN� SECONDED BY MS. SVENDSEN, TO APPROVE THF, CHECK REGZSTER DATED MRRCH 8� Z985, AS PRESENTED. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THF. MOTZON CARRIED UNANIAfOUSLY. AD�OURfJMENT: MOTION BY Mli. PRIEDITIS� SECONDED BY MS. SVENDSEN, TO AD,70URN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE, CHAZRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED TNE MAR. 24� 1985, HOUSING 6 REDEVELOPMENT AUTXORZTY MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:00 P,M. Respectfully submitted, ,� , " i�¢ ��_ yie aa Recording Secretary _, �, CI7Y OF �RIDLEY APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 26, 1985 CALL TO OROER: Chairperson 6abe1 called the March 26, 1985, Appeals Comnission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Members Absent Others Present Pat Babel, Alex Barna, Jean 6erou, �im Plemel, Donald Betzold None Darrel Clark, City of Fridley J. A. Menkveld, 1299 Mississippi St. N,E, APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 72, 1985, APPEALS CONMISSION MINU7ES: MOTION BY MR, BARNA, SECONDED BY MS, GERpU, TO APPROVE THE FEB. 12� 1985, APPEALS COMMISSZON MZNUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL bECLARED THE MOTION CRRRZED UNRNIMOUSLY. 1. REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 Of THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE .�, Fridley,�Mn.� 55432) ates, Inc., 12�3�3 i1�T'ssissippi MOTION BY MS. GEROU� SECONDED BY MR, BARNA� Rb OpEN TXE PUBLIC HERRING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THF. PUBLIC HEARING OpEN AT 7:31 P.M, Chairperson Gabel read the Administrative Staff Report: ADMTNISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 1040, 1050, 1060 67th Avenue N.E. A, PUBLIC PURPOSE SERYED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.07.3B States the width of a lot sha11 not be less than seventy-five (75) feet at the required setback. Public purpose served by this requirement is to eliminate overcrowding in a residential area. ti -- APPEALS COMMISSION MEETIN6, MARCH 26, 1985 PA6E 2 B. STATED HARDSHIP; "We have more than ample square footage for the three lots but the street frontage is slightly less than required." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: The total size of Lot 7, Block 2, Brookview Second Addition is 234 feet (northJsouth) by 215 feet (east/west). A lot split was approved by the City in 1972 dividing the lot into three parcels. ()ne parcel being the soutfi 100 feet; tfie other two remaining parcels were the north 134 feet split into equal frontages facing 67th Avenue. The south 1�0 foot parcel was recorded, however the north 134 foot parcel remained one parcel at the Recorder's Office and the City action approving the lot split has become void due to the time lapse. The petitioner had very recently asked for approval of a townhouse development on this parcel, but he has since withdrawn that request and has now petitioned to have the parcel divided into three single family lots tfiat are 75 feet, 70 feet, and 70 feet wide. Each new parcel would exceed the required 9,000 square foot lot area. The petitioner has therefore if this development. been issued one building permit on the entire parcel, petition is approve�l, he would have two more lots for The Planning Commission recommended approval of the lot split at their February 27, 1985, meeting. This recommendation together with the Appeals Commission recommendation on the variance will go to the City Council on April 15, 1985, The petitioner has already dedicated to the City the easements necessary to serve the property with City utilities. If the variance is recommended for approval, the staff suggests that you stipulate that the petitioner agree to pay two park fees, agree to pay for any street and utility improvements, and agree to record the lot split prior to any more building permits being applied for. Mr. Clark stated that enclosed in the Comnission agenda was the Planning Comnission minutes in which the Planning Commission approved the lot split contingent on the Appeals Commission's approval of the variance. He stated that at the last City Council meeting, the City Council also approved the lot split contingent upon the Appeals Commission's review. He stated there were some other stipulations placed on the approval of the lot split, and the petitioner has already agreed to those stipulations. The petitioner has already dedicated all the easements requested by Staff and City Council and Planning Comnission. Besides the variance for lot width, no other variances are needed. APPEALS COMMISSION �EETING, MARCH 26, 1985 PAGE 3 Mr. Menkveld stated the information Mr, Clark had given was accurate and reflected his position. MOTZON BY MR. BARNA� SECONDED BY MR, BETZOLD, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:40 P.M. �MOTION BY MR. BARNA� SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD� TO RECDMMEND TO CITY COUNCZL TXE APPROVAL OF REQUEST FOR VARIANCE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDUCE THE FRONT YARD WIDTH OF A LOT USED FOR A DWELLING FROM THE REQUZRED 75 FEET TO 70 FEES FOR TWO DWELLINGS TO BE LOCATED ON ZAT 7� BZACX 2� BRGi7XVSE7J SECOND ADDI2ION� THE SAME BEING 1040 AND 1050 67TH AVENUE N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CNAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2, OTHER BUSINESS: Mr, Clark handed out a page out of the Zoning Code pertaining to the required front footages for lots. He stated this was in direct relation- ship to the public hearing they had just had. He read 205.D7.3.6 Lot Width: B, Lot Width The width of a lot shall not be less than seventy-five (75) feet at the required setback, except: (1) (2} If lot splits are permitted with the lot width less than the required seventy-five (75) feet, the lot must still meet the most restrictive lot requirements and setbacks; except for the 1ot area and lot width. Mr, Clark stated that he felt it was pretty clear that it said that the lot split variance they had just heard at this meeting would not have been necessary as long as the Planning Commission and the City Council recognized the footages they were approving, and, in fact, the Planning Commission held a public hearing advertising their action on the lot split. He stated there was some confusion as to whether the Appeals Commission, Planning Cortmission, and City Council wanted the Appeals Comnsssion to have a special hearinq just on the variance. If the Anpeals Comnissfon, PTanning Commission,and City Council feel a hearing should be held at Appeals Commission like they had just done, then he feit Item ;�2 (above) should be deleted from the Zoning Code. Mr. Barna stated that ordinarily a lot split went to Planning Comnission, to Appeals Comnission, and then to City Council. This was the first time he had seen it go to the City Council before coming to the Appeals Commission, APDEALS COhg1I5SI0N MEETIN6, �ARCH 26, 1985 PAGE 4 Mr. Clark stated that �n the past, there have been many lot splits approved for lots smaller than 75 feet without Appeals Commission approval, as long as it was recognized at a public hearing what the approval consisted of. If, in fact, the petitioner needs a setback variance, either front yard, side yard, or rear yard, tfien it was clear to him that the Appeals Comnission must act. Mr. Clark stated what they needed to clear up was to either leave Item #2 in the code and not do wfiat they had just done at this meeting. or take it out of the code and continue to do what they had just done. Ms. Gabel stated she felt the Planning Commission should also take a look at this, because there has alway; been some confusion by the Planning Comnission concerning lot splits. She firmly believed that if the City grants a lot split and the petitioner cannot build on the lot without variances, the petitioner's hardship is created by the City and the City has to grant the variances. Ms, Gabel stated that part of it was the idea that some pepple get lot splits and don�t necessarily know what they are going to do with the lots. They do not have a plan, and she thought that was part of the reason for some of the confusion. Mr, Clark stated that could be true, but it could be made clear to the petitioner that be/she has to meet setback requirements unless he/she wants to come back to the Appeals Commission for a variance on either side ya�, front yard, or rear yard. Ms. Gabel stated she understood what the code was saying, but she had not been aware the code read this way, and she did not know if the Planning Commission members reall�� realized it read this way. She felt the Planning Commission should be made aware of this process. The Appeals Commission members agreed and agreed to send this on to the Planning Co�nissio� so the Planning Commission can have a better understanding of what happens when they grant lot splits. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. BARNA� SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD� 2L� ADJOURN THE MEF.TING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTSNG AYE� CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MARCH 26� 1985� APPEAIS COMMIS520N MEETING ADJWRNED AT 8:00 P.M. Respectfully submi ted, yn a a Recording Secretary