The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 08/07/1985 - 6854PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING City of Fridley A G E N D A WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 7, 1985 Location: Council Chamber (upper level) CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: JULY 17, 1985 7:30 P.M. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP N85-09, BY ,IpNN R U: Per Section 205.07.1, C, 1 of the Fridley City Code, to allow the construction of a second accessory building, a 24' by 10' shed with an attached breezeway on Lot 2, Slock 1, Spring Valley Addition, the same 6eing 1341 - 64th Avenue N.E. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: GONSIDERATION OF A PRELININARY PLAT. P.S. #85- neing a repiat ot all that part of the SE quarter of Section 22, T-30, R-24 and of the NE quarter of Section 27, T-30, R-24, Anoka County, that lies Southerly of the Southerly right-of-way line of Interstate Highway No. 694, Easterly of the Easterly line of the Plat of Great Northern Industrial Center, Fridley, Northerly of the Northerly line of Lot 1, Block 1, Midwest Addition and Westerly of a line 92,9 feet Westerly of and para11e1 with the center-line of the Burlington Northern Inc. main tracks as it now exists. , Containing 12.4 acres more or less. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP �85- Ner Section 205.18.1, C, 9 of the Fridley City Code, to allow exterior storage of materials and equipment on a strip of land generally located West of the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks and East of the Great Northern Industrial Center Plat. All lying in the South ha7f of Section 22, 7-30, R-24 and in the North half of Section 27, T-30, R-24, County of Anoka, Minnesota. 4. COt�1M,UNITY DEUELOPHENT COMMISSION REVIEW 5. RECEIYE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JULY 1 1985 6. RECEIVE ENERGY PROJECT COMMITTEE MINUTES OF JULY 2 1985 PAGES 1 - 15 16 - 2 4 �� 25 - 31 �j`�' `�' 91� 3 2 - 3 7 ��: - U 38 - 56 GREEN LILAC 7. RECEIUE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES OF JULY 11 1985 SALMON 8. RECEIVE HOUSING & REOEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES OF JULY 11 1985 9. RECEIUE APPEALS C 10. OTHER BUSINESS: ADJOURNMENT: ISSIOPI MINUTES OF JULY 23, 1985 WHITE YELLOW CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANtJING COhAtIS5I0N MEETING, JULY 17, 1985 CALL TO ORDER: Yice-Chairperson �quist called the July 17, 1985, Planning Commission meetinq to order at 7:35 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Mr. Oquist, Ms. Gabel, Mr, Kondrick, Mr. Minton, Mr. Wellan, Mr. Sielaff (for Mr. Saba) Members Absent: Ms. Schnabel �thers Present: Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator John Flora, Public Works Director Mayor Bill Nee Dennis Schneider, City Councilman Bob Barnette, City Councilman Brian Goodspeed, City Councilman Charles Boudreau, Parks & Recreation Director Mary Schreiner, Parks & Recreation Comnission �an Allen, Parks & Recreation Co�nission Don Schlosser, 7773 Ranchers Road Jack Menkveld, 1299 Mississippi St, N,E. Evelyn & Forrest Cornelius, 4020 Main St, N.E. APpROVAL OF JUNE 19, 1985, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR, KONDRZCX� SECONDED BY MR. MINTON� TO APPROVE THE JUNE 29� 1985� PLANNING COMMISSZON MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOPZNG AYE� VICE-CHAZRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRZED UNANIMOUSLY. 1, TABLED 6/19i85 BY PETITIONER: PUBLIC NERRING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL , _ , „ er ec ion .,, o t e r� ey i y o e o a ow exterior storage of materials and equipment on Lot 6, Block 2, East Ranch Estates Second Addition, the same being 7773-7779 Ranchers Road N.E. MOTZON BY MR. KDNDRICK, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARZNG ON SP #85-05. UPON A VOICE S�OTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAZRPERSON OQUISP DECLARED TNE PUHLIC HEARZNG OPEN AT 7:36 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 17, 1985 PAGE 2 Mr. Robinson stated this involved an industrial site located on the southeast corner of Ranchers Road and 77th Ave. Zoning was M-2, heavy industrial, and adjacent to it was a commercial zone. He stated the petitioner was asked to screen the storage area whicf� he has done with a 6 ft. high cyclone fence with webbing, At tfiis time, he would iike to bring the property up to code by gettinq a speciaT use permit which is required for outside storage. The only stipulation Staff would recommend was additional landscaping in the general area of the boulevard to be completed by fall. He stated Staff would work with the petitioner on this. Ms. Gabel asked what kind of mater9als the petitioner would be storing. Mr. Schlosser stated it was a machine shop so they are storing aluminum scrap and steel scrap before it is hauled away, wooden chip pal?ets and wooden barrels. Mr, Kondrick stated that when machining, they have to use oil to make the cuts. He.asked if there was any danger of the oils and cutting aids from spilling and contaminating the ground in the area of the water run-off. 14r. Schlosser stated that at any one time they would have 3-4 55 gallon drums of virgin or used oil on the premises. Some material can �e recycled or picked up and hauled away. He stated they have applied for an EPA permit to dispose of this material, Most of the mate'rial is stored inside. It is not a very flamnabTe material. The coolants they use are water soluble and under prope� treatment can be discharged down the drain. M^�TZON BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. MZNTON� TO CLUSE Tf1E pUBLZC NERRSNG ON SP #85-05. UPON A VOICE VOTE, RLL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQU75T DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:42 P,M. MOTION BY MR, MINTON� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCZL APPROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP k85-O5� BY MACHININC� INC.� BY A�N SCHLOSSER� PER SECTION 205.I8.1� C� 9 OF TN£ FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO ALL0G7 £XTERIOR STORAGF, OF MASERIALS AND EQUIPMENT ON IAT 6, BLOCY 2� ERST RANCX ES2ATES SECOND ADDZ- TION� THE SAME BEING 7773-7779 RANCHERS ROAD N.E., WSTX TXB SSZPULATZON TXAT THE PETITIONER WORK WITH CITY STRFF FOR ADDZSIDNAL LANDSCAPING SO BE COMPLETED BY THE FALL OF 2985. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CXASRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Oquist stated this item would go to City Council on August 5. _. _ ._ 2. PUBLIC HEARING: COWSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. A85-02, MEADOWLANDS ., eing a rep at o ut ot , ea ow an s Secon t ion, e same eing Kenneston Drive N.E. PLANNIIJG COMMISSION MEETING JULY 17, 1985 PAGE 3 MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MS. GRBEL, TD OPEN TXE PUBLZC HEARING ON P.S, N85-02. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE, VZCE-CHAIRPERSON OpU7ST DECLARED THE PUBLIC AEARZNG OPEN AT 7:94 P,M. Mr. Robinson thanked the people in the audience who were at the meeting for the discussion of this item. He stated they were invited to the public hearing to help give the City some direction on what could be done to improve this park. He stated Ron Ley, a consultant from TKDA,was at the meeting to address the engineering concerns. Mr. Robinson stated the park was located just north of Mississippi St. and south of 68th Ave., bordered by Kennaston St., 68th Ave., and 67th Ave. He stated the park is approximately 4,4 acres which is quite large for a neighborhood park. The area in general is R-1, single family. He stated there has been a good deal of recent single family development in the area. Along with the park, they are also looking at the future direction for the area and, along with park development, there could be some additional road development, He stated the people had been invited to the meeting to look at some plans �nd discuss those plans, Mr. Robinson stated the park has very bad soils and is characterized by a high water table, some right near the surface, and in some areas, a few feet below the surface. He stated there is a lot of peat in the area--up to 8%, ft. of peat found from soil borings. The general concept is to make the park more usable, improve the drainage, improve the soil situation, �ahere they could have an activity area such as tennis, play areas, tot lot, etc „ on good soil. To do this would require lowering tf�e water table and stabilizing the areas under the activity areas, One way to do this was through a pond. He introduced Ron Ley who would discuss the engineering requirements and how some of the alternative plans were arrived at. Mr. Ley stated the City hired TKDA to lcck at the site which has some water and soil problems. When they looked at the site, it was in the spring around May, and he was surprised that the park could even be functional as a park because of the standing water. Mr. Ley stated soil borings were taken, and there was up to 8-8% ft, of peat in one of the borings. They had the City take some ele•:ations to determine some of the drainage characteristics, the storm sewer, and the ditch. He stated their objective was to provide the same facilities that are there now and to ir�corporate them into a layout that was functional as a recreational facilitity and would be usable after it was drained and stablized, To do that, they came up with three different possibilfties. He stated both the Commissioners and those in the audience had a copy of these three schemes. He explained each of the alternatives to the Commission and the audience. PLANNING COMMI55ION MEETIN6, JULY 17, 1985 PAGE 4 Mr, Ley stated that at this point, their interest is to find out which scheme the City is interested in pursuing. They recommend Scheme "A" as being the best engineering approach to solving the drainage and foundation probiems. Mr. Robinson stated the City has suggested that some lots be sold off as part of this redeveiopment. Depending on tfie scheme, 5-9 lots are suggested to be sold. Ms, Gabel asked that as far as road and utility assessments, who would pay for the assessments? Mr, Robinson stated there would be no assessments to existing home owners. Also, as far as development of the park, there would be no assessment to existing home owners, There could be an assessment for the road to the new lots. Ms. Gabel asked Mr. Ley the cost of the different schemes. Mr. Ley stated the cost estimates were as follows: Scheme A - approx, $350,000 Scheme B - " 400,000 Scf�eme C - " 425,000 Mr. Ley stated these were tota7 costs for the development of the park, the street, and utilities. Ms. Gabe7 asked Mr. Robinson what he anticipated the lots could be sold for. Mr. Robinson stated that lots in Fridley average $20-25,000. These would all be standard sized ]ots and all would meet minimum code requirements. Mr, Oquist asked for comments from people in the audience. Mr. Ed Berntson, 925 Mississippi St., stated that shortly after the City was incorporaied in 1949, there was a pTan to deveTop the northern part of this park area. The City was petitinned for building permits and the City denied them because the ground would not sufficiently support single family homes. The land lay idle for some time. At a iater date, another group petitioned the City to build in the same area. The plan was for several multi-story apartment houses. This petition was also denied by the City because of lack of suitable underlay under the building sites. If this proposition goes through and the lots are sold, how does the City plan to overcome those deficiencies of lack of proper underlay for building? He stated he believed if just the park was deveToped and the drainage was improved, there would be little opposition by the neighborhood, However, they are opposed to the selling of the lots on the low grade. Dr. Ken Vos, 990 - 68th Ave., stated his house was the last one buil� on the corner of the park. He bought his property from Michael Servetus Unitarian Church. In the contract, they put in that the lot had to be buildable or it would revert back to the church. In digging footings, they had to go down 19 ft. to get the peat out, and he must be at teast 6 ft, higher than the park on the north side. If he was going to buy any lots in the City of fridley, he PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 17, 1985 PAGE 5 would make sure the lots were buildable. If they are not buildable, the City is going to get them back. Dr. Vos stated he was at the meeting to address two major issues: (1) the selling of park land in general; and (2) the improvement of Meadowlands Park. Dr. Vos stated the selling of park land was not an acceptable way to raise revenue. He itated he would give a couple of scenarios of some things that have happened in Fridley parks over the last couple of years. He stated they have had a problem with Moore Lake East. The City could come in with a plan to sell off lots north of the beach to pay for some of the development in Moore Lake East, but he did not think anyone would agree to that. Another problem was Moore Lake West. They could sell about 7 lots in the Moore Lake Sand Dunes area, to help pay for improvements to Moore Lake West, but he did not think any- one would want that. A third example would be Comnons Park. He stated that in these park areas, selling park land to build revenue has never been discussed, so why is it being discussed now? Dr, Vos stated the selling of park land was a decision that should be made with extreme caution and a lot of comnunity input. In his perspective, extreme caution has not been dertanstrated. A�velopment plan has been drafted by a consulting firm with City suggestions. Community input prior to this meeting was non-existent. Dr,Vos stated the Parks & Recreation Commission must have looked at these plans, and was there any reason why the Parks & Recreation Commission did not seek corrmunity input before these plans were brought before the Planning Commission? It seemed to him that the role of good government was to ask the owners of the park, the taxpayers, if it was a good idea to sell park land. Dr. Vos stated the second issue he wanted to discuss was the actual improvement of the park which he did not think was as important as the selling of park land. From his informal survey of the neighbors who have property on the park, two suggestions most commonly given were (1) to improve the park by doing a major change in the water problem; or (2) to admit the park has peat and water problems and develop the park with natural improvements such as trees, but leave it green. Dr. Vos stated he would like to address the water problem. Right now his back yard, after a heavy rain, acts as a city holding pond. There is also a home- owner at 891 - 66th Ave, whose back yard also acts as a holding pond for the city. He also has an open storm sewer pipe in his back yard. So, drainage is a concern to the neighborhood, and it should be addressed. He stated he saw the whole problem as drainage but not necessarily the selling of lots and improving the park. In fact, he felt the selling of park land could increase the drainage problems, not decrease the drainage problems, Dr. Vos stated he would like to present a petitron of 50 names to the Planning Commission. He stated he talked to every home owner either on the park or across from the park. The petition stated: "We recognize the need to improve Meadowlands Park. However, we do not accept selling current park land to pay for improvement costs:;" "—' PLANNING COh71ISSI0N MEETING, JULY 17, 19$5 PAGE 6 Dr. Vos stated his recommendation for action by the Planni�g Comnission was to recommend to the City Council that all the plans presented at the meeting were unacceptable since they involve the sel]ing of park land and that they should get some input from the citizens as to the best way to go. Mr. Minton asked Dr. Vos on his opinions for park development. Dr. Vos stated that in walking through the imnediate neighborhood with the petition, he got two kinds of responses: (1) Some said there should be some improvements to Meadowlands Park as nothing has been done for a period of time; (2) Some said they like the park the way it is, They know there is a water probiem and drainage probTem, but with some minor construction, they would be happy with the park. Dr. Uos stated he thought there should be some improvement to the park but not to the kind of costs being tatked about at the meeting. He thought the City needed more citizen input into this. He felt there were some things that could be done that would not cost that kind of money. There are still parts of the park that are not going to be usable for 12 months of the year. Dr. Uos stated he just did not like the idea of raising revenue by cutting park land. Once they do that, they set a precedent. If it is done here, he could see some other parks in Fridley where they could do the same thing. It was not the mentality he wanted to see the City get into. Mr. Jeff Gustafson, 6558 Oakley St., stated he lived adjacent to the park, He stated he also had a petition to present to the Planning Commission. He stated his petition was passed throughout the City in different areas in order to get the opinion of people who did not live right on the park to see what they thought about selling park land for commercial usage. He stated that out of 69 people he talked to, 68 signed the petition which stated: "We, the undersigned, residents of Fridley, are opposed to the plans to replat part of Meadowlands Park for private �se. We are further opposed to any attempts by the City of Fridley to restructure the use of any park land. We feel this is a serious threat to the quality of life that we enjoy in this city," Mr. Gustafson stated that, as far as the park itself, he wouid agree it did need some improvement and something had to be done about the drainage. He stated the City has to look very carefully at which areas are high and which areas are low in the park. But, the point they are trying to make is that they will not stand for the selling of park land. MOTION BY MR. MINSON� SECONDED BY MR, KONDRICK� TO RECEIVE PETITZON NO. 16 AND PESITZON NO, j] , -' UPON R VOZCE VOSE, ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CNAZRPERSON OQUZST DECI.ARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PLANNING COMMiS5I0N MEETING JULY 17 1985 PAGE 7 Ms. Mary Schreiner stated she was tfie Vice-Chairperson of the Parks & Recreation Commission. She stated she agreed with Dr. Vos that park land should not be sold for development purposes because of financing. She stated that the Parks & Recreation Comnission had discussed the alternative plans for Meadowlands Park at their last meeting, and it was the concensus of the Comnission that they have a neighborhood meeting to get input from the citizens. Staff was directed to set up a public hearing for their next Comnission meeting in August, but then they found out that the Planning Commission was having a public hearing. Ms. Schreiner stated that as a member of the community, not as a Commission member, she would choose Scheme A with the exclusion of selling any property because the City Council has directed TKDA who have more expertise, and they know how to handle the problem of the ponding. The ponding area seemed to be a marvelous way to take care of the bad element and put it into a usable park area. Mr. Frank Sinna, 6542 Oakley St., stated he wanted to know why the park couldn't be improved without the selling of park land. Mr, Robinson stated the City was not saying park land had to be sold. They are just presenting Some options which do include the selling of some park land.which would help defray the cost of park development. In terms of planning, no one's mind is made up, and that was the reason for the public hearing--to help get some input so they can give some direction to the City Council on how to proceed. Perhaps there could be a scheme where no lots would be sold, but that was not one of the options being presented at the meeting. Mr: Jeff Gustafson stated that those who signed the petition were not saying they were not in favor of improving the park; they were simply saying they were not in favor of seeing park land sold, He stated that when he first moved into his home, he had asked the City to sell him 40 ft. of park land along his property so he could take care of the land, put up a fence, in order to make the property more presentable, He was told the City could not sell park land to private individuals, that it was dedicated as park land by the builder and therefore could not be sold, He stated he made several attempts to purchase Property, and that was what he was told every time, It was disturbing to him, because now the City was turning around and wanting to sell park land, Mr. Chuck Mann, 6611 Jackson St., stated he wanted to see a plan without lots being involved. Why does park land need to be sold in order to improve the park? Mr. Richard Cis, 891 - 66th Ave „ stated he was the owner of the property men- tioned by Dr. Vos with the storm drain in his back yard. He has problems with it year round, He stated he was in total agreement that no park land should be sold for the development of the park. He would even rather see the storm drain remain in his back yard as much as he hated that. Any plan for improving the park would have to include draining it somehow. If water continues to be dumped into the park, there will always be a swamp. l PLANNING COhA1ISSI0N MEETING, JULY 17, 1985 PAGE 8 One citizen stated he brought a petition around Oakley St., and it was the general opinion that the residents did not want to see the street go through. They want Oakley St. to remain a deadend street. He also would want the street to stay as it is, They like the privacy it gives them. Mr. Sid Inman, 6747 Overton Dr., stated he also had drainage problems in his back yard from time to time. He stated that a lot of the yards around the park have water problems. He stated the City is interested in doing something for the park, and he thought it was unique that the citizens are being given the opportunity to give their input. They should act now and say what they really want done to the park. Mayor Nee stated he wanted the people to know that the City Council members were very concerned about neighborhood input. He stated what was bei� discussed at this point was engineering and overall schematics more than detaiT. He did not know why the lots were even put in the plan, but what they are really talk- ing about is the overall concept, and if the development could be worked out without the lots, that was fine. Mo member of the City Council had any special reason for wanting to sell off park land. Councilman Goodspeed stated he had heard several comments about why there wasn't more input from the cortmunity, and that was the reason for this public hearing. Mr, Peter Eisenzirnmer,6535 Oakley St., stated he also liked the privacy of the dead-end street. He would tike the street left as it is, and he felt it was unfeasibie to buiid on the lots that were being mentioned. Mr. Bill Doyle, 6551 Oakley St., stated that as he understood what was being said by the City was that they should look at the total picture, decide how to improve the park, and then decide what to do about selling park land. He stated he wanted to reiterate that the neighborhood was strongly opposed to the selling of lots. That decision should be made first, and then they can discuss how to improve the situation in the park, Councilman Schneider stated there were a number of issues involved here, but he thought the best thing the neighborhood could do was give the City a sense of what they would ]ike to see developed. Dr. Vos stated he would like to refer to the public hearing notice which stated: "Public Nearing: Consideration of a Preliminary Plat, P.S, #85-02, Meadowlands Park by the City of Fridle.y". He stated this was not a public hearing on park improvements or citizen input; it was a public hearing for the preliminary plat. That was why in his presentation he said there should have been some citizen input before the pu6lic hearing on the preliminary plat. Mr. Oquist stated he agreed this was not the place for citizen input on what sfiould be done with the park, That probabTy required discussions of a citizen committee, Those type of discussions should have taken place before this public hearing on the preliminary plat. He was a little surprised the public hearing on the preliminary plat was before the Plannfng Commissfon before any of these other discussions had taken place. PLANNING COM4IISSION MEETING, JULY 17, 1985 PAGE 9 MOTSON BY MR. XDNDRZCK� SEC0.1'DED BY MS. GABEL� TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON p,S. #85-02. UPON A VDSCE VOTE, ALL VOTING RYE, VZCE-CHAIRPERSON OpUIST DECLARED TXE PUBLZC HEARING CIASED AT 9:02 P,M. Mr. Oquist stated he thought they had gotten a little lost as to what this public hearing was actually for, He was not sure they were ready to discuss what should be done with the park. They have gotten some good input from the consultants and some input from ihe citizens, but it was not a concensus input because the citizens have not had the opportunity to discuss this among themselves before coming to a public hearing. He stated maybe the park issue should go back to the Parks & Recreation Comnission and then it can come back to the Planning Commission when there is a concensus of the citizens as to what they would like to see done in the park. Mr, Kondrick agreed. He stated this issue should cane back to the Parks & Recreation Commission where it belongs. The interest in the Parks & Recreatior Commission is to change the park from what it is into something that is more usable a�d more fun for the residents. Before this had all happened, the Comnission had wanted to have a public hearing at their August meeting. He stated they would like to have that public hearing and have the issue of the preliminary plat continued until they have gotten more input from the citizens. Then they can come back to the Planning Commission and City Council with some recommendations as to what can and should be done with the park. Mr. Minton stated he supported t4r, Kondrick's concept of deferring this issue. He felt both the discussions they have had at this meeting and the engineering information was important, but now it was important for this to go back to the Parks & Recreation Comnission in order to get some neighborhood input. Ms. Gabel stated she also agreed. She had been very confused with this whole discussion. MOTION BY MR, HONDRICX� SECONDED BY MR. MINTON� TO TABLE PRELZMIlJARY pLAT, P,S, N85-02� MEADOWLANAS PARK, BY THE CZTY OF FRIDLEY� AND TNAT THE ISSUE OF PRRK DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN BE RESUBMITTED TO TXE PARKS 6 RECREATION COMMZSSZON FOR MORE INP(IT. Mayor Nee stated the City Council was the only body that can authorize a replat, and as far as he knew, the City Council did not authorize the City to petition for a replat of public land. He stated that in order for the City to sell park land, the City has to have City Charter requires the cortments and find if there donated. None of that has on the preliminary plat wa the public hearing was to a public hearing in order to find an excess, The City Council to have a public hearing to hear all is an excess for the purposes for which the land was happened, and he did not know why the public hearing s before the Planning Commission. He had also thought discuss the park improvements. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 17, i985 PA6E 10 3. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: 1.5. #85-05: BY J. A. MENKUELD & ASSOCIATES: Spiit Lot 2, oc , roo view3eco—n�ddition into�'our Tots,�wo T"-�ooE iots, one 81.5 foot lot and one 82.29 foot lot, to be used for single family residences, the same being 6771-6781-6791-6795 Brookview Drive N.E. Mr, Robinson stated the lot was located just to the west of Brookview Drive, north of 67th and bordering on 68th Ave. This large lot was zoned R-1 as most of the area is, ke stated the proposal was to divide the lot into fm�r single family lots, Each meet the minimum of 75' lot width, The only variance needed for the houses would be lot area, None are 9,000 sq. ft. If tf�e Planning Commission approves the lot split, they wi71 automatically approve the variance for the lot area. Mr, Robinson stated Staff would recommend the following stipulations: (7) park fees- 3; (2) the lot split be recorded at the County prior to any huilding per- mits being issued. Dr, Vos stated he would be very happy to see single famj9y homes in this area. The houses Mr. Menkveld is building now have improved the area tremendously. MOTION BY MR. XONDRICX� SECONDED BY MR. WELLAN� TO RECOMMEND TO CZTY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF LOT SPLZT� L.S. #85-05� BY J. A. MENKVELD & RSSOCIATES� TO SPLIT ZAT 2� BLOCK 2� BROOKVIEW SECOND ADDZTZON INTO FOUR LOTS� TWO 75 FOOT IATS, ONE B1.5 FOOT ZAT� AND ONE 82,29 FOOT ZOT Tt� BE USED fiOR SINGLE FAMZLY RESIDENCES, TXE SRME BEING 6771-6781-6791-6795 BROOKVIEW DRIVE N,E.� WITN TNE FOLLOk'ING STIPULATIONS: 1. PARK FEES (3) 2, THE TAT SPLIT BE RECORDED AT THE COUNTY BEFORE BUILDING PERMITS ARE ZSSUED. The petitioner, Mr. Menkveld, expressed some concern that he would not be able to obtain a building permit and begin building on the first lot before the lot split was recorded at the County. Mr. Oquist stated he would recommend the Citv Council work out some arranqement UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CXAIRPERSON OpUZST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNRNIMOUSLY. Mr. Oquist stated this item would go to City Council on Aug. 5. 4. L07 SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. # 85-06, BY EVELYN CORNELIUS: Split the East half of o , u� or s u tvision o, in o ree sec �ons, one section being the North 20 feet of the East half of Lot 1, Auditor's Subdivision No. 39 to be added to Lot 4, Block 1, Wilson Addition, the second section being the South 75 feet of the North 95 feet of the East half of Lot 1, Auditor`s Subdivision No. 39, and the third section being the South 90 feet of the East half of Lot i, Auditor's Subdivision No. 39, all to be used for single family residences, the same being 4000 Main Street N.E. PLANNIN6 COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 17, 1985 PAGE 11 Mr. Robinson stated this lot was located just west of Main St, and south of 40; Ave. The proposal was to take the existing lot and split it into three sections. He stated Staff would recommend the following stipulations if the lot split was approved: (1) park fee; (2) the lot split be recorded at the County prior to any building permit beinq issued or prior to Oct, 15, 1985; (3) finalsurveyed dimensions of lot split meet city code. MOTZON BY MR, MINTt�N� SECONDED BY MR. SIELAFF� TO RECOMMEND � CZTY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF IAT SPLIT REQUEST� L,S. #85-06, BY EVELYN CORNELIUS, TO SPLZ2 TNE EASS XALF OF LOT Z� AUDITOR'S SUBDZVISION NO. 39 IN2Y,) THREE SECSIONS� ONE SECTION BEING THE NORTH 20 FEET OF TXE EAST HALF OF ZA T 1� AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION ND, 39 Tp BE ADDED TO LOT 4� BLOCK 1, WILSON ADDITION� TXE SECOND SEC270N BEING THE SOUSH 75 FEET OF THE NORTX 95 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF LOT 1� AUDITOR�S SUBDIVISZON N0. 39, AND TXE THIRD SECTZON BEZNG TXE SDUTX 90 FEET OF THE EAST XALF OF IAT 1� AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISZON N0. 39� ALL TO BE USED FQR SINGLE FAMZLY RESIDENCES� THE SRME BEING 4000 MAIN STREES N,E.� WITH TfIE FOLLOWZNG STIPULATIONS: 1. PARK F6E 2. PHE IAT SPLIT BE RECORDED AT THE COUNTY BEFORE ANy BUILDING PERMZT SS ISSUED OR PRIOR TO OCT. 15� 5985 3. FINAL DIMENSZON OF IAT SPLIT MEET CITY CODE, UPQN A VOZCE VOTE, RLL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHRIRPERSON pQUIST DECLARED THE MOSZON CARRZED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr, Oquist stated this would go to City Council on Aug. 5. 5, REVIEW OF CHANGES TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE - ZONING: Mr. Robinson stated these were changes that had to be cleaned up in the code. He stated he would review the changes page by page with the Commission. Page 55 g, 77 Under 205.07.5.A(3) and 205.21,7,A(2), Parking Requirements, the Commissioners agreed that the words "filed by the City" should be added to the sentence. Page 56 Under 205.07.6,D(2), Drainage and 6rade Requirements, the Commissioners recommended the Engineering Staff relook at the maximum scope (grade) as they felt maybe the 1:10 (lp%) grade was too restrictive. Paqes 61, 63, 64 66, 67 69 - Uses Permitted with a Special Use Permit Mr. Robinson stated that at this meeting, they had recomnended approval of a special use permit for screened exterior storage of materials. He asked if the Cormission felt a special use permit should be required for exterior storage of materials and equipment that is screened or just be required for unscreened exterior storage. l PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 17�1985 PA6E 12 The Commissioners agreed this was a concern and Staff should do a little more research into this. Some factors that might be considered are (1) adjacent land use; (2) size of storaqe area; and (3) visibility from right of way. Mr. Robinson stated the City Buiiding staff was recommending that in R-3, all cortanercial and all industrial zoning, concrete curb and gutters be required in the parking lots. They have done some investigat9on and it has been found that the gutter portion is really not any more expensive because it is laid with a machine. The City feels this would be a good requirement to have, The Corrmissioners agreed w9th this requirement. MOTIO.N $Y MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR, KONDRICX, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL THE AppROVAL OF THE CXANGES TO CHAPTER 705 OF THE FRSDLEY CITY CODE - ZONING ALONG WITH TXE RECOMMENDED CHRNGES AS DISCUSSED RBOTIE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTSNG AYE, VICE-CHAZRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRZED UNANIAlOUSLY. 6. RECEIVE JUNE 6 1985, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. MZNTON, SECONDED BY MR, KONDRICK, TO RECESVE THE JUNE 6, 1985, HUMAN AESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON R VOICE VOTE, ALL POTING AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRZED UNRNZMOUSLY. 7, RECEIVE JUNE 10, 1985, ENERGY PROJECT COMP1ITTEE MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. SIELAFF� SECONDED BY MR. WELLAN� TO RECEZVE SHE JUNE I0, 1985, ENERY PROJECT COMMZTTEE MZN[ITES. UPON R VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG RYE� VICE-CHAZRPERSON OQUZST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 8. RECEIVE JUNE T1, 1985, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTZON BY MR. OQUIST� SECONDED BY MR. MINTON� TO RECEIVE THE JUNE 12� Z985� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTIN6 AYE� VICE-CHAZRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED SHE MOTSON CARRIED UNANZMOUSLY. 9. RECEIUE JUNE 13, ]985, NOUSIN6 & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MOTZON BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR, KONDRICK� SO RECEZVE TNE JUNE I3� 2985, XOUSING 6 REDEVEIAPMENT AUTHORITY MZNUTES. UPON A VOZCE VDTE� RLL VOTING AYE, VSCE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PLANNI��G COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 17, 1985 PAGE 13 10. RECEIVE JUNE 18, 1985, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTZON BY MR, WELLAN� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK� TO RECEIVE THE JUNE 18� Z985� ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY GYJMMISSZON MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CXAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 11. RECEIVE JUNE 25, 1985, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK� TO RECEIVE TXE JUNE 25� I985� APPEALS COMMISSION MZNUTES. UPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE� VICE-CHRIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTIDN CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 12, RECEIVE JULY 9, 1985, APPEALS LOMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY MR. MZNTON, 21� RECEIVE THE JULY 9� 2985, APPEALS COMMISSION MSNUSES. UPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOmING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRZED UNANIMOUSLY, 13. OTHER BUSINESS: Mr, Robinson stated that included in the agenda was a letter to Joel Katz, District 5 Traffic Engineer, MnDOT, which relates to intersection signaqe and marking. He stated that as a follow up to this letter, there will be a meeting related to traffic speeds on Highway 47 and 65 at 9:00 a.m, on Thursday, July 25, at Fridley City Nall. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. XONDRICK� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO RDJOURN TNE MEETING. UPOti A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERSQti OQUZST DECLARED TXE JULY 17� 2985, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETZNG ADJOURNED RT 20:30 P.M. Respectfully su itted, _� y aa Recording Secretary o �m � . . �-� � �� , �, , �, ,s�s ��_ '�-.�. �� %�_ s� �s - a� `<=�� n �.F/=�ve 7� �3 .�.x� �' $ � -0 5 �dtEa+a �h.�._ GS35/ � �}�, / `,,,,.�.,_, G 5 3y da� !/%j -�--� .��?..:o S�%/ CvG ��,e ,r/�' ..Qyy��Ga�c �,�5` Mt5ss4s,p�� -�. ��..C�-., 7 yg' �y;,.��,�r�f �' �oti �cY T,�0,4 ��K�L / 'L�/� �i�/ / • f" i�Ir.l� ,�/ �/ ( �tCfr�� i �-a4r�+1� �eG� �( `�C�/.T'-�Y� ,�/ ��. t �, � � Gssg Dok,� f. II�. �� r�,.� � 5S ) �ak1 t� J� � �/� �� i� clt�a �%1� a� �-� '�%-1,..�.. �� a G.��,,, �� y v� � ��C-��,�� 4� G v�.2�✓ ir, .�.�. 4 �-�--�.,y.��.�— ��I- 6 c �``,c..� � .�, ti �,, -_ `� �•-`y �---� (j %5 � � O Vc � ro .� �--�.R-r ��., � 7 �/- ��. �C, �!,%i✓ ly� Cfi� !/!l-�f �i°,.u,G �i' C ��Lt�•.�) f� � �— Z�� ' -�- o yv �� h a� �� ,c;�C�t / � _ �5-O� �s-- oa gs-a� �SE 1 � ra z �d'So Z_ � j -o�. �a � �� J S - G�Z �,� - c a- Ss —d� �S- � 6 �5-0� gS - c a �5- � 2 ��-��, �s�fi� - g s-o z Y��i�rc� ��=1�� o %GD �c�,�-�-�� %IG vo � 70� �� .� �-�� 6 7�' / ��%r-t.f�.�- � , ,d�" ,,,,�1 � 7 f�,3 l��`''�^ �. h.� �yo � �' � ,o.� ti,c, �iyo ��C� �tF � �.7`v.r..-- �7. i � ; �'.- ,�-- �% �,E1R� 1o(rb t�1t` k�� u� �(�eM�� I z4q n�w�.g� g(-� r��, �Sc��. �� 5� �� S� N�� '� �a�- ,��Z� 7 � ' ��:.� rJ� � ;r �� i�� .�� -.f� �� G 6//- ��-�t � �- �- � �, � � -�T �- � � � z -�h,d`ley �� # �- 4 ��.. �a-- � �-_ �a .r� z .�¢ L >� �L ��3 -�� -- -� � a� Notice is hereby given Commission of the City Northeast on Wednesday, for the purpose of: PUBLIC HEARING BEF�RE THE PLANNING COMM155ION that there aill be a Public Hearing of the Planning of fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue August 7, 1985 , in the Councii Chamber at 7:30 p.m. Consideration of a special use permit, SP #85-09, by John �. Rau, per Section 205.07.1, C, 1 of the Fridley City Code, to allow the construction oi a second accessory building, a 24�foot shed with an attached breezeway on Lot 2, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition, the same being 1341 - 64th Avenue N.E. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. VIRGINIA SCHNABEL CHAI RWOMRt� PLANNING COMMISSIOW Publish: July 22, 1985 July 29, 1985 Q: GITY OF FFIDIHY� � SUBJECT . � s�a, v��vEr+s�rr .►ve. Na. SPECIAL USE DERMIT iR10lEY. MN. B563Y 16121.671-�60 17 SP N 85-09 �E f ADORE55 �3y� =(,y�'�lve IV� a►rE Ju� 1� 9, I�35 PWiNING CAMM1155IUN: APPROYfD DISAPPROYED _ DATE �%�1 �LNO. �— LITY COUNCIL: APPROVED DISAPPROYED DATE NO STIPULATIONS: NAME �C�h T� �(]1,! FEE�,�ECEIPT NO��l� STREET LOCATIUN OF PROPERTY LfGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY PRESfNT ZONING CLASSIfICATION E%ISTING USE OF PROPERTY ALR�k6E-��PRQPERTY DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE SPECIAL Section of the Code: ��, �,C. ! ARPLIED FOR: Has the present applicant previousty sought to rezone. plat, obtain a lot split or variance or special use permit on the subject site or part of it? `�yes no. Mhat was requested and when? The undersigned understands that: (a) A list of all residents and owners of pro�er- ty witfiin 200 feet wiilbe attached to this application• .. '' � � '(b) This application must be signed by ail owners of the property. or an expianation �iven why this is not the case. (cj Responsibility for any .lefect in the proceedings resulting from the failure to . tist the names and addresss of all residents and property owenrs of propgrty in Question, belongs to the undersigned. A sketch of proposed property and structure must be drawn and aYtached, showing the fotlowing: 1. North direction. 2. Location of the proposed structure nn the lot. 3. Dimensions of property, proposed structure, and fron and side setbacks. 4. Street names. 5. Locatio� and use of adjacent existing buildings (within 350 feet). The undersicjned hereby declares that all the facts and respresentations stated in this application are t�ue and correct. DATE � l �T , JQ�r7 SIGNATURE ADDRE55 ��j i-�p�-1 �� U� � i�� TELfPHONE NO 5� l- l, �99 John D. Rau SP �85-09 1341 64th Avenue N.E. John D. Rau 1341 64th Avenue Fridley, MN 55432 Richard S. Carlson 7691 Old Central N.E. Fridley, MiJ 55432 Donald E. Hi11 7985 6reenwood Drive Minneapolis> MN 55432 Bob M. Calderom 6401 Central Avenue Fridley, MN 55432 Joseph J. Nelson 1357 64th Avenue Fridley, MN 55432 Frank Demello 6134 Woody Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 J. A. Kath 1352 Hil]crest Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Ernest G. Klar 1373 64th Avenue Fridley, MN 55432 Russell Prior 1340 Mississi�g432treet Fridley, IN� Mailing List Planning Commission July 19, 1985 Thomas Mitchell 6391 Central Avenue Fridley, MN 55432 Leroy T. Tovsen 1356 64th Avenue Fridley, Mt� 55432 Mark W. Po9emiller 1340 64th Avenue Fridley, MN 55432 Barbarg J. Niller 7372 64th Avenue Fridley, MN 55432 13 � - � \�— � 19 -J I � EN�� , �, � ►TE 1418 HiGHWkY _ �tO. � ,. • — �.°:<--- ,�: - �-- - - - ..�,.. f200 72-�=0 !!xp .. �LSO �LO. +,� s� X :�r�. .r � 1, �%J',/,::a Iz/t ts4o ; �`�3ro �34p ' =' �: 2 c 3� � 13s8 3�6 l400 ' �� , - � . y�{�j � Jet.'r� � �� h �7 . �Z.�� (11 % w�.� '�Nr, c � (A� '� M � . . ,�y ! .ro .fil.ra� 1 : �i'xi� �� , �i �� • , (.f`{4 T G�4! �� •.,,�,� . �.�+x � <a � ,� _;,'��'�,�� `_ �� • -c �• '� ({<7 � 04�� J3ri' r 6+3, ,�.x �. � � 5 �, ��.�� ,B � N �7 � J �, �;b..;..f, t 3 { , �.« <°-+•<fl R r�� ' ��1qi� :! ir� r � � � .�.lN•� • � �'i'ro� ��i��,,. ��G��2 `L��i$ 62 � � �•64ti � _ e • ^ /O r , -6_ -:N:: v' � � � � � e�r ,;�': . l'f /� . .r�, r G 4��.,� 3� : � _ '� _ •��p (� Oe r�.� � r O ir'} 01 7- Q: :�iw �. � ' To' ,,' : ��R � W . (,.fd! : ' ti 1393 ! 365 t4c3 6391 . `� d , �-.� .�';:.. `� - � � •. .3 _ 98B ; a �� `a� -� � ��TH ,AVE. N ��l3 ,H�fyAL � n� Jb/ � .. ( 0 G34/ � R ,• � : )�✓7'Z �3�4 l400 ` 3 63C� { �lo�L 3`!�P ia 400 � f�f(�� }d J�lfr', r3� ��' : �` - { �, •� "r'•- 6 • ` , .. 63 C� , �� a,qDO. T R��: '4► ,o, Cl 'w /JQ !GiL1 •�i370 . .� �� p� � y `fJ �b . ...� ! � : 3 ) _ ' : . .. �j �cs�. � „ yv� � � : �6 � � - ��K � u3xS � �� , . �azt ,� �� * >� 36�30 ht � - 9 �,i'-��p ,j � ........ s , �i�r _I�.'� , c�3 .' rERRACE �; : 34S �BG.soo� ti'�, G��,� ��.y � � ` � . '� I .13/3 ✓S�o �420 i929 , r. , : � RICE 4CREEK ROAD �'" � � �� _ bza; �> i . ..� ,.. � � - _ '. ,� Gt93 �r � `�,3io� `3oC ,�-ZO. «►w � � (.rs►� i Gyi� �sv� : Lz�1� .,.., �=� 16 i 15 •, , � � , cz4s � : 1 , •. f ' t +.- : r. : - � -:.,... ' � � I - ' , � � :� . � Ep�e� 6 zzq ` `�. ; : � y � ��4 � AUD. �� g �N ! rd 1,,, = 6z1z - ks",>� � G�� . �� .c 2O � nr9ue�n ,wi�`d f�� '". y� ,� ��!., (V � � � �i S ,� .s , •,� I ` K 7ti 1 � � ti � w #-�-� TH'- i�►. rz �? s O rG y << � T � . � ' ' i . ... � ' • Ll • . . . w ' ' . f . ' . . . S �� .� . ;�„ � �. * . ',� : "u, � �N � - _ - ,�Z I 1 r 22 .�. . _ � -- � � . h- � ,�� , a � �o ��, �� d �LL _� r� � � �� 3� o� � .�— r r � � � �^'� � �� d � 0 �o � � � � � .. � � o_�� a � i� ��, ; � � � � � r�rc rl 23 . '•'�3v ' if. .r.' . � `�_ _ .__.. - _' _ ' _. _ . . . . .. , � • Q, . ' • ; v �: � = r• r . . i� - �..� �� _, � 24 Notice is hereby given Commission of the City Northeast on Wednesday, for the purpose of: PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION that there will be a Public of Fridley in the City Hall August 7, 1985 , in the Hearing of the Planning at 6431 University Avenue Council Chamber at 7:30 p.m. Consideration of a Preliminary Plat, P.S. #85-03, Great Northern Industrial Center East, by Alfred PJelson, being a replat of all that part of the Southeast quarter of Section 22, Township 30, Range 24 and of the Northeast quarter of Section 27, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, that lies Southerly of the Southerly right-of-way line of Interstate Highway No. 694, Easterly of the Easterly line of the Plat of Great Northern Industrial Center Fridley, Northerly of the Northerly line of Lot 1, Block 1, Midwest Addition and Westerly of a line 92.9 feet LJesterly of and parallel with the center- line of the Burlington Northern Inc. main tracks as it now exists. Containing 12.4 acres more or less. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. _ VIRGINIA SCHNABEL CHAIRWOMAN PLANNING COMMISSIOi� Publish: July 22, 1985 July 29, 1985 25 c�rr oF ��c�r. Sl18JECT Mr �vEws�rr wvt. Nt. iNlpLty. MN. 6:i�3! K12/ E71-��p ZONING ACTION YACATION PLAT zs ZOA / SAV /�—"�'-- PS I �— �.,, e OROINANCE N0�_p�B�ISHED wu�cc�� : i � PLAMIIM6 COIi�tI5SI0N: APpROVED UISAPPRpyEp a� �I11' COUNCIL: PUBLIC HEARING DpTE �TE N0. _�]ST READ --- �I� ��I�� APPROYED �_2ND READ PARK fEE REQUIRED: �I�PP�YED Q0.TE --'— A�DUN7 NO STIPULATIOHS: PAID – �� n nortnern Railroad Co. STREET LOCATION OF PROPERTY Great Plorthern IndustriaEECent RECEIP7 N01 7 yb � �EGAI DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY See reliminary )at PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFICATipN P_ 1__�EXIS7ING USE Of PROPERTY Vacant ACREAGE OF PROPER7Y 12.�__DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROPOSED ZONING CLASSIFICATION OR TYPE OF USE ANO IMPROVEMENT PRpppSED Has the present applicant pre��ously sou9ht to rezone, plat, obtain a lot sp)it or variance or special use permit on the subject site or part of it� Nhat was requested and when? �Yes x no. The undersigned understands that: ty within 350 feet must be attached to this application (rezonin a) A list of all residents and owners of proper- ting), Mi�a p� attacAed to'this bppl5cation. 9). 300 feet by all owners p{ the propert �ib) This application must be signedat- (c) Responsibility for any defect in the�anation given ►oh tist the names and addresss of all residents�and�� S y this is not the case. question 9 resulting from the failure to . belongs to the undersigned. proP�rty o►+enrs of prop�rty in A sketch of prpposed prbpeny and structure must be drawn and aYtached, showing the following; 7, Morth direct9o�, p, Location of the proposed structure on the lot. � �i�ensions of property. proposed structure, and fron and side setbacks. 4. Street ^a"�• 5• Laation and use of adjacent existing buildings (w;�i� 350 feet). r� �^de►'si9ned hereby declares that all the facts and respresentations stated in this apptication are true and correct. 1ATE i – �'� S Il�IATURE�.��,� tnorrr � � I � _ No ayp -7�3 Planning Commiss�on July 19, 1985 MAILING LIST Great Northern Industrial Center East P.S. #85-03 8urlington Northern 176 E 5th Street St. Paul, MN 55101 Midland Cooperative 5320 Main Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Land 0'Lakes Box 116 Minneapolis, MN 55440 Midwest Publishing 801 SE 9th Street Minneapolis, MN 55414 Kurt Manufacturing Co. 5280 Main Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Reserve Supply 5110 Main Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Jon Monson Edina Executive Plaza Suite 219 5200 Wilson Road Edina, MN 55424 Twinstores In�. 351 ;•J Dundee Road Wheeling, IL 60090 Lamaur Inc. 5601 East River Road Fridley, HN 55432 Perlman Rocque 711 Vandalia Street St. Paul, MN 55114 Plywood Minnesota 5401 East River Road Fridley, �1N 55421 27 � ` ��. � E �� ;j }: e s ,, � .. t � •• �'�_- � , (- , : , ��,�__4_�. f - -- - ._— � ___, _ J 1 ___ �__ � ___ti" �� Y - - . . - -�-=- .- �+�sr,�- - - _ . -° ; . -±�---- ,- ' =,. s fiA �.. :1./1gsy�9•,« _, � -r � . ..�. ,.... ! � ) � w�v � - ` - � `�--- . bW '' . ''° r +� � =�VO��{pp �_ t� :.+i . � -._ - , --- � — _ _ . ' GREAT � , ��----------- . �__ .. ,. -� � ._� , ,,, . ;; • I ' OJILOT pp / �. � �: � � ' .t/ .._� .:_. ' %,, ^' h ` • t � ��r-I / yr -;) . ;! ---? ----• '� r � j y � • , ••; � � :•, ,�- •` NORTHERN � � �r� � , :i� + - • , I �� . �� . ;� � `; ' - � � �� , • - .� _ ' � - � •:. .4 , t�� _� .. . I - , •. o, � 1I �� -.� �,5 O'� 'i. 1 I I I Y�/ iY�"Y�.V ♦ - �� tl I •1 .:, ,� /NDIUSTR%� t . s �" � ;, I � T � � ( �v. I� � �. . � . ; , _ _ � �: �� ; � ��- i �-_-_.l�, . -.,� . , � . ' a.u, _ --I �i' . ,a� �.., , � 'I � ... ��-�, .e � , r . +. ! �' ` . ` � '�t'i4 - �., �...' _ . ,:. /,. � I� �` ,I , � � . , _ • � / r CENTER , i..,� .. _ . : . , . � ,_ .., .. rWr r, , -- • . . _ C. I p 6REAT r: __ ._ _ . � r.... __ . ', � _ i: �i-- : � _ 1^1'�--_ , :.,, >k NORTHERN I ' � (. � �y� ••... 6 ' ; 9 , Y i ' . • � _ _ ,� �, :: _ .. � I .. 1 �i .. ♦•.Oe • Mln � - I �_ � � _ �� L �� • _ '� •. �111N M • �. . . i _ .� • I ..� ''. jqM • il - ... .�..• • �� /�Y � � � _ � �"'u. � �':: . . - _ Y . , .... .. � ��- � _ �..- szN� war.. �� ;;.� • - _ .; /NOlJSTR/AL : ": .;`g.. - . •• ; . . . �o�q�r wi.e�'� � � � i. e tl .. _ + �Q � __ " �� . ` � . . ;' . j . .- � . ; , . , •-�'._ € . _ . .�--1. �:� � � t .� ��.sr . '��' � Q .- . T T , � � � � il r I ; 2 � wrur • ' P i i r�� ak � � C£NTER + . ? � $ 4 5 � �' �' j f e�i � ' � • � , i t- � -- ,; . `j � � :�i.. � o..,o.. , i i . } >� �__.__ " . ::_ i ' ' � , � F •: s... � '-�'� si sr: w�r --'�_ . - a � �. _. -, . � .��. �..�.. "• "•�� € " i L.• �• : ..//'.� .� • . M1�0f N � � " - • � ��.�• i • � NO. 79 � 2� �� i 1 ! I 't � � 6 . I � i . � ' ; � � ; � r t °,_, . :. �,...� � , Uw'tJS'..::..JiA.ver.cifi —�_�` ... r . � � ,�` . � � � '_' � . 1 A f'` A T 1�1 NI �/l A D I r• ✓ � •wr• • �✓ y • • � V1 W W �^ Z W U J Q � F- U) ; _,_ .. � . . � '• •_. - ..o. �..>�_: � -- r Z �..... - � y r � � • C J� � �N O�J��y ` W = � r Z _•_ •._• ' f�:��.. �.. :,--„ � «� s c• c • �`� v..• W Y� L i� � e♦ 2 `°:�__�_. N � L � o � . � • 0 Z j �J • •� �r� � •M= •��S• .r.r.. 1i � - ��.ae_'..'� p :.. � G��9ic• D�..=� � [�w • H- O V i..a� �ii• a i�i[i:�i � �� <�r a Z Q ` " ;=f<CF' °w !-' o :��,;.€ : i? _ � Q m •�i :=��_- o t�.� :-- cc •< x =°:F a W ..._. ,..... ¢ � W ��F:r=ttF' a � � <i�:��e;�' ;, , �. : .`�, ; 30 : j�' �I 'i { ,.i i � ',�� • �','�� i�, i; �' , / . !�, ., 0 . ,. ��j ' ��__` i ' � , - i i I �I � - - ' i Y I I ,, A 1 ; /1� i I I� 0 I � i !I. �; z � �, ;; � , , '�� ; �" -�i -� � . '�' i � d' • - � �, + , � _ -_ I _ ��, � �� ::: � �, ; > � ,,,� � ,.�`,� � : � .. - , �� ,�� .� . . _. ! � �' _ ��i � - �. � ' — , ,,. a;� , • ' i; lI � � � 0 ; � �. J i�ii ' r i: ' . 1 ' ' . �II' r • • ,� U;i `I � 1•� i�� ' i ,' � � �. ! � �_ � . �,�, - , ' .1 .�� . 1 1 � I � � � ~� . - ` `� '1. • . � ' � � �) J.+ �' J __ � � ��. -i — �, ` •: �R � �'� ^��,� 6 �� ; _ - �� . �: ., 1'��I -r o � . . { o O � ' J J � ii ' � r� �,....., ; �;; . --•--- �� , ,. ��1. �- � r ; >; �f- - ,. � . , �.�. .,�. '� - - `� ��l • -T � - r:.tiw %� i � � i i ' t '=--`=- _ _ J � � � �` I i � ' I III I ,� i `l � \ � •�� - 1 �� ` . � ' �I � 1 � i� 17 �_ l . � .� . '��. � : 1�� ,`r J � � �� `l3� ��. , i �, � � r . � i: �? i ' - �� - �I G i , J / � � �'��7 ��. I� yi I � 4 o� ' .�t '��.� � j= i'�° 6,�i m�� r 'FI � � I I � �°� I li�'�.c_ ��,�� :�� 7 ;;>i �a Y .�� i� ''y_� f.,i � k; j�,4_.3.C�:]�i ." ! � � � � I 1 i ~ � _ r �-_ _-� � I I6� , � �� _r � �� - - - -'1 � - - - t .� II � � 31 PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley in the Lity Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, qugust 7, 1985 , in the Louncil Chamber at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP �85-08, Burlington Northern, by Jon Monson, per Section 205.18.1, C, 9 of the Fridley City Code, to allow exterior storage of materials and equipment on a strip of land generally located West of the Burlington Northern railroad tracks and East of the Great Northern Industrial Center Plat. All lying in the South half of Section 22, T-30, R-24 and in the North half of Section 27, T-30, R-24. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. VIRGINIA SCHNABEL CHAIRWOMAN PLANNING COMMISSIO�� Publish: ,]uly 22, 1985 July 29, 1985 32 8r� I85 e�Tr oF Fraio�er, � SUBJECT M]� UN�VEp61TY /�Nt. NE. FA�Dl6Y. MN. 65v�! 1i721.671.?�5G SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP !" g,5_ n� � A strip of land generally located West of the Burlington Northern RR tracks � . and East of the Great Northern Industrial Center Plat. All lying in the South half of Section 22, T-30, R=24 and in the North hatf of Section 27, T-30, R-2 ADDRESS DATE PLANNING fAMMISSION: APPRDYED DISAPPROYED DATE N0. CITY COUNCIL: STIPULATIONS: APPROYED DISAPPROYED DATE NO NAME FEE �� RECEIPT NO 17ay� STREET LOCATION Of PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF.PROPERTY PRESENT ZONING CLASSIFICATIDN EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY ACREAGE OF PROPERTY DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE SPECIAL USE APPLIED Section of the Code: 2p�. � Q,�,�_ 9 v' _ Has the present applicant previously sought to rezone, plat, obtain a lot split or variance or special use permit on the subject site or part of it? __yes no. What was requested and when? The undersigned understands that: (a} A list of all residents and owners af pro�er- ty within 20o feet wi11 be attached to this application. '' - � • '(b) This application must be si9ned by a11 owners of the property, or an exp7anation given why this is not the case. (c) Responsibility for any Jefect in the proceedings resulting from the failure to • list the names and addresss of all residents and property owenrs of propgrty in question, belongs to the undersigned. A sketch of proposed property and structure must be drawn and aYtached, showing the foliowing: 1. North direction. 2. Location of the proposed structure on the lot. 3. Dimensions of property, proposed structure, and fron and side setbacks. 4. Street names. 5. Location and use of adjacent existing buitdings (within 35� feet). The undersigned hereby declares that all the facts and respresentations stated in this a plicntion are true and correct. DATE 3 I o 5 SI6NATURE IDDRESS>/b � S.�C�C �.� ��%I�%y=,.SS/� S�TELEPHONE NO �%—� f' G r � . i ..a, a MAILING LIST SP N85-08 Burlington Northern Burlington Northern 176 E 5th Street St. Paul, MN 55101 Midland Cooperative 5320 Main Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Land 0'Lakes Box 116 Minneapolis, MN 55440 Midwest Publishing 801 SE 9th Street Minneapolis, MN 55414 Kurt Manufacturing Co. 5280 Main Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Reserve Supply 5110 Main Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Jon Monson Edina Executive Plaza Suite 219 5200 Wilson Road Edina, MN 55424 Planning Commission July 19, 1985 34 ':,, ` :� __ ! Fe� i�i ", 5 i ' �� + � ; �� Ij 1/' -t _1..._��- � :' ---^-•.`.:.��_._._9 = I _�ir--�-- — `: � '--•: ..___M�P�'� "— -+-_ f�, �y�,�_ - L+.' L.! `1A0,__�� A¢�~� !� _,.i - )T ` '" +-�7—=--NC`�'�4,00- - - - � � .•. �-- � �" j �, � •� � iJ-'--�------- - - --' �� .. ' 6REAT `� • • - ,, - • � . I � �YTIOt OO '� ' 1.s � � �' � Yr,y Z — — _ _ _ � ;`,� ..7,.._. . ,��, _� �`'� ' 1 :��'I' .. _ � ��^ �� . / " "� NORTHERN ' � � � � :� •. . �,�� :: , - � i �. �� .� , `; -• ' >� �t+ i, / . � . � `t rl �� ,1 � �. • � .s. �1 �: Z 4 � J Y4I [�//a1�. V � � � C�� t � ` � .`.� �. . ,� � Ci ' , �� T � � ""`�t_ � t� � , • �`' : � � � i ,-:.:,' . '� /NDYJSTR%� , y : � ` , _ � ' I I t � , . : I ;; • � • � � • ;' .- ! ��"'� ' � , w�wr e - ) I . rti h�V J� .'s • �: . -I � •� � � : �, ,�. � , � , B � � � I I i �.,,,;�..... ;.,, `� � Y` CENT£R -- .� , f'Y � "•�1 •r'iY . . "___"�'..._-_ .' a � _1' I l ____' � ..�_ .. . . .. � . . . .. 7 ..'.... � . �_+�+ 2 6REAT ' ' — - - � ' I °� NORTHERN � I �`'' � �'q�r � I ♦• _-� _. _ ' � .- 6 ` � 9 -. � � __-__- � .,..:: _ � �� .. ... .�,.� . —_ . ��: �:: - w..o. �. , w �. � � . � wnin M � N I � `� � `t _�- _ 4n • I ' L: , _'. " _ _" ' �' � � � i � • � � hR�� I�"• '•' R � • . - c ::.- s2Nq. �r�r =:�. wi _, ± . . _.. # «;.., /NDUSTR/AL : �:. � ' .«,�.•. , � p � � � ' I � — — - - - , �� --" ; � � I. . I ° r [ � ....,._ i ' !4 � � � i E 1 � � r' 1 �., j I � 'I I 1 e ' ' �gk* - � ,; t I . � V�.�� • ... ,Q � MU� � ' ,.i V. �r� �I CENTER '� - t �; ' � 4 ', 5 ; // ' I �I ( .- ,- - - � ._ � .._, e f � , .' ; . , t ' (� � � ' '.I � � � Yl'O� ! �� V aa �_. ..._ .' � - y:s:� � � � �1a-�. ;;_;..'_T�sr: w�r -- - _ a € �' • J t . • ��.. „��..i• • ..//•. �..r. _._ �Y��1� M - .. •��• j r. • . � _ �� 1 ` i P . N0. 79 I � �� ,. � ; � �' � � ' � 6 "' + f �i '.�..::� "' i� � i'. i � .... .-J�=_�,. � .� �. UN.!!.i S/-�LJ �ii �INGO/CI � i � I � — � �: i.., t :, . � � i � � ! �� •' , LOCATlON MA _ .` � : %� ^ 4'- I 3� Si 0 , -- - t � � �� ` i� , E� `` • 0 � � � � �� 7 Xr I ,..:r. r • � � � ,. .,a � i� \\� \` � \ n �� A \ . << . � .` _ ! �,,�� . , �_ 9i�� II i!: pA n O • u !' 1 �'G�� oo ii �'_ , .+"� ,1 � L � L � � .i ) . � li e: � � - �I % - -e / , �I I I i � / / � J ?��I,`'a''�,f � I �nlml,�� W� Y�51 c � '� Si j� � a >� ;? '.Y.� �,��PI� �,ikl� '�'i -l�,ti, r �� - � � � � � � ,i ^� J . �, �� I �_ - - ' - 37 � , t CITI'OF F R1 DI.iY �- ��r� 7/30/85 ��Y �►. v��ECT OIRECTORArE OF PUBI.lC WORKS MEMpRANDUM John Flora, Public Works Dir. Commission Review ��-' —� o 0 C=y>'o�o h� �jD �; - - �_ PW 85-233 t0 Jim Robinson, Plannin� Coordina Planning Commission �_r�p� ir�0 r_ DRAF? At the July 29, 1985 Council Conference meeting, an agenda item dealt with the Community Development Commission Work Plan. Mr. LeRoy Oquist, Chairman of the Community Development Comnission was present to discuss his concern about the purposes and long range goals of the Community Development Commission. Last year the Council also had sane discussion dealing with the tasks and purposes for the Energy and Environmental Quality Commissions. As a result of the discussion about the Commission purposes, it was determined by the Council that it would be appropriate for the Planning Commission to review the organization, structure and tasks of the member commissions as well as the overall organization of the Planning Commission. The Council feels that the comnissions serve an important role in providing community input into their analysis and discussions that are processed through the commissions. It is through this resident involvement that we can obtain cortmunity input and a sense of public ownership of the government process. process. Recommend the Planning Commissi�n initiate a study of the member canmissions in order to establish an prganizational structure which would provide responsive recommendations for Appeals, Special Use Permits, Plats, Lot Splits, Vacations and Rezonings; deal with the various human elements of the Community; provide a source of information for the Lity's environmental concerns; and act as a sounding board for local neighborhoods. It is hoped that from the recommendations of the Planning Commission,the Council could review the identified needs of the community and establish a commission structure which will not only provide advice, �tion in the governmental process. CaiU1JITY DEVELOPfE.�f C�TIISSIaJ WOWG�'L/� � 1932 co,uussioNERS: LeRoy Oquist, Chairperson Ken Vos, Vice Chairperson Sharon Gustafson !11 Gabel Connie Modig CITY STAFf: Mary Cayan 39 40 COhMUNITY DEVELOPMEIJT LOMMISSION The fridley Cartnunity Development Carmission was established in January 1976 by the City Council for the purpose of "promoting and maintaining high qual- ity comnunity standards to ensure a well balanced and orderly development, rehabilitation and redevelopnent, of the City of Fridley; including, but not limited to econonic development, industrial and c mmercial developeie�t, hous- ing, transportation services, public utilities, cormunity develoQment proje�ts, and other related development activities�� (Section 6.151) The scope of the Caimission as set forth in Section 6 is as follows: 6.152 Scope The Carmunity Development Carmission shall act as an advisory Comnission to the Planning Comnission for continuous community planning and development of the canprehensive City goals and policies. Any change in related correnunity planning and can- prehensive City goals and policies must be reviewed by the Planning Commission who will then make recomnendations to the City Council. The Comnunity Development Comnission shall advise the City Council, after a policy review by the Planning Canmission, in the development of programs to give increased effectiveness and direction in implenenting established City goals, poli- cies and franework, and recomnend actions as needed relevant to the physical development of the City. In order to fulfill the responsibilities mandated by the City Council, the Canmunity Developnent Lortenission has chosen the following goal areas to focus upon in 1982: Canmunity Development Block Grant Housing Comnunications Neighborhoods o� ¢ �� C� Z) S! O� LI� g W � J =� � C W G' ou t 1L� i �' =m � ' V � O �O Y Y • p w V � N � � Y iO c u YN �R • �+ Y N � � Y ► V � ^ �O w> s� .+°� NL O� N 1 4 M L � e n c g � � o . N �O A V �+ C � � N T � 4 � C� �+ Y V �r .. c a u y 8 U � L C o ' A O Y N � �p C N� C�+ V G O - Y Q C C C C O N q � 6 ca �� o� og � W � U � U N 4 4.� a � 6i �p �Y N�+ yW °,�:e c ,� u � o ° o> d — �n i�O E M C` l q L d Y 4 � 0� y y p � M Y N ti G �o � d � �a d � c Ex Gn � � v+� � N f7 O (.7 m O N N ua� a+ G c �m .� � P d W �SL Y 'J � l� O� O� L Y- W O O L W 1� c � o U �C �' r j Yg q N � F a c c O A J 4 L �r � V p rm _ � �O U :�Fo u a e �. W 'Y . E C N � C YO UU�C �� O� �r O � W 0� �+ C > C i ° o i MA r� c � .+ Y 40� � � C O O r f A � 0 L 8 � 0 x - L -- � N � C V O C ✓ O o�O U C � �u u C d O t— N W -E �.+ E =u w � L -� q C ¢ C l r�- 6 C P C 9 C 4 {.� m O u n PN � C 0 >� � T �+ C � �E �E E L � u o a. � � N � g Y L r � O n O Y � � N € 0 � 0 G M • V � � O G L d 6 L u �. m � o� U � I'f l m 9 'v �g o > � W C U L L O 9 H € E C a U � � 41 [�� W' �� r� VI W� � 8€ �� O O € 0 O , I q € � � € € r u o 0 0 0 � = o O o 0 d V � N a > ) n�-� - o c a � e � NL O C W 0� N � P J[ y Op� q �� C^ C � -oc., L O C L q � � T � � �_,L, W O T�' N �+ G L O C V gv c°a o°c.+ � A E C i �. D�� V O L O ✓ m V�s w O C O C O ti q Y N � y q L g c n r n n �� a �� L U N C� N N Y � q C �' ��e �a o oc oc �O T V G GC L � V N p+ � W C P d P r O '� T O C N C= Q y�N =.� N > V P > V D �o p 3 P d C� C Y N O C C c c a �- ¢ m r a x c- � N 1'f N �( Q -� � � A 0 r v • 9 an U L O — � C � a1 .+ o � - o 'o °n i o 6 o g r- � N 4� �- O W �+ C C �.+ J � C a .+ a. t,� I C � o Z q O N �+;� 40 � '�'^ l p� S:I N CL p�i C�Y.� 4 �n Q o �� 0 0 o t 1-- L �r �r C 4 M Q 0 o c a � n .+ m � p ' � L N � .�+ E � > Fd� �° � '� P E A c C =Or L�r� O L Y G O U C O o �, � o q��' O� Z Y l � ✓ A L N•_.• u� E r w~ 4 « L C C L aiv � ..°v Wau +�-AE �� C+6+ qw L Wy b N C� P u 6 L O q c � e= ¢ c L c E ` C O` E G E P G �� 4 C 0+ i� .+ � 6 E � �^ ^ G� �^ .^y uq+J >�+� NC c o�E ? a o� o� � N nl Y E `� € � „_ O N L � €�� 9 L L A A ��g O �+ L N N O G . F � pv N u c � N O i � 0 o c L L D n -� a .+ o = gr- N m N q C C � x o ou C� M 6 R v � c q� r� O Ey m E C O O ai u V d y L l � O o ✓ N C ie d 9 .+ a c p� .n N C O y.� � � L N ✓ m 6 � V C O O �a Z �s u 9 � L W u c c ._+ s O � � iu v+o � N g N � r 9 4 O N �n W du � c i � o �+ L L uo o °n � o n 42 �o� :=i -, �� 'WI a �� M�Ey 4 m G L E� H 'jNN� q = C L ]�M L � �i=>� i ) H C C O C O M V q N � � � � Y C ' L 7 � y � ~ W V y > G 4 � � � N N q V q 9 � u �e N C Z C q d O O Z d �+ N l >. C Y Y p 4'� 6 E �O O L S+ G • l� ^N y l V U � T O L > u z � � � N O M � C N U � _ L > ^ N S D O^ � Y n �c oro � L p N Y O c ii, � � E s �r C O � N > C D u rn � W .+ o V C W E rt �+ O u c A� Y W W S L n 6�i C Y O � � Y . H� O ZI{ 4 C c Oi I' E C� O 6 E Q i ^ V � U U I U�� C i i 4 � > C ^ Y N Q� O � O Np� I w M u' � i.�.= il o # �S � F S � V � 14 N � N i u �- � � 4-'' O O � O N � T'j � _ � d � > Ay � Y � 6 G l V .+ u � ya b a L > � E � g' W S� M � N � O �O > c u �-�. � � u M � C �+ N� 4U E u .t 8 ~ t o v �a E � G � ^ Y M C s. ar �n w V � 4 N f. O L � d� >�a � E F n �. L r �r O N L U L 9 Y 4 G t Y y 4 �yo Op y O 0� G C�C � r�- E ►° E I«°- E O O t �+ O �. p J �. q N N • O � C V q v� f. N G a. P ^ A S W � O C O O � V^ L C ° � € gc �i ' n C �E G W � C C E �+ L ^ ^ O � C y O au �� Q .� o s l N' L Y t W U V�C q L y� M O C O C �+ O O� � n p� c d L � Q� M C ` M u a �+ .+ L V 9 � C U ac • s E C c c M � i c., T^ .�, a C N q V Y! O� W � � N � O � � 4 �r L q O�'Y � w N L � L y � u p u =� � ' V E a, ' q N C �o�o J C q N YC_" -, � L � � u G G > ' � O 9 � C L � Q N W N � M C N acd L ..e� � P� € W O y � � 43 Q� a, �p Y � w � � � �� U 4 O O J O � 8 � ra � � ' t 8 c P L 2 u � � Y G O N L C � OI O N M ti L W O L O w O � � � M p p1a EL O� � C 4 �+9 ' O V u �n O u � � n g �8 t P � jN� � C t! O' O � '� e.l F� > Q� 01 N N l� q d.•� .^ 6✓ Q C N C Q N C C p .- N 1'f O N O O l S L P Y C � ► ✓ C V v 1 Z' L V PB YNL ✓1�I 9 C P S y O C 2� 9 • 6i 9�ON 2� i � y� V � N � O 9 WI C� p 2� Y4L > L B O d O f C L �p� �p C Y � O � �' � O � N � � � y � ' r � a � � p� � �X � u o �+ � � 9 !� 9 4 p w G� 60 N > N C ]� ^ W C S N L 9 C L L g oc .,v �+ C C �. q ' q Y L = u$ �'� u„ �� o �ii �° �i � �t W >� V >d 2 i Q � R� � N I'f L O tiE 6 Y N r M 8 O L L O L P d C � � • � M r N C p/ N V O V � q N 44 COF1MUt�1TY DcVELOPP1Ei�T COMMISSION WORKPLAN 19u3 �OMM1S510NERS: le Roy Oquist, Chairnian Kenneth Yos, Vice Chairnian Alfred Gabel Carol Fassett CITY STAFF: Kent Hilt 45 �� a �� . , � �� V y ��5 �O� ka � �r� � .p. �� L 4 y �� , � ., i � Y • ��y �� :� �:°. � ��m �a .:�r � e ��.�1�°o r��es '� �ag�� w�� 09 ��q��$� �°�� S"s Y W a q C � y � ti �y � p� � � � V � 10 O u� � V y O S �,�8� �$ ��,E�� "� ��99�� :�E' �F �E� �...�b�7€�� d��y �� .:e�2�ra�� 'ib� �vr ri�� 8 �� x�� ..� w�i 4 4�� ' Y a �w a� .� � � 46 6� � b � � � � � � � � � � � . � n � � i 0 T 6 � � � � � S 6 � �'. � � O" E� Ws ��,� t �� ; �s • . � � �ga �S�i .;��. �� i� � y ) y4 � o � �8 �� O S � � 52 � Y V � �0 � a � � .: s �s � q�� Q� � p�C yTpyY ��+a] C ��p� ris� � � 0 47 6� � 5 �� a� � �� Y Y Q � � �� o �� s �� ,. �°� zw � �9 .� r ��O yiy H V � �a � `�� ' �� - C �� o � 4� u . . � a � � : � � s � . � � a .. � � � � a � � � � � r Y5 w � O�� C P .:�r! O � 6a 3a e ..� �� .. � .; E � �f � �� Y� • �y� f � � I �i Y � Y � Y �e� s� fi� • �1 r1 N �� so �� Y �dg 0 � _ �3 � ��Y� �'�` R � �$ �:aai � 50 COMMUPIITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MORKPLAN 193q COMMISSIONERS: Le Roy Oquist, Chairman Kenneth Yos. Vice Lhairman Alfred Gabel Louis Schmidt Carol Fassett CITY STAFF: Mark 8urch 51 : � � � Si S N � w Yya V s� �� ( s$ s, a $ . . � � ow � �8 a°� .. - � I � . � � _ � _ e C � � � Y ^O Y O � � S � Y e B N Y j � • Y • Y O w 9 .e • o a -, S � G N O 'B . � ,. °:.a:fe li;��: es��w 3=:g�� ee�� aa�s ��:g Y a .� � .. .. �.3wo� � �. - 8 ! w .. .. n i Y nl O .� O E" L :i- . taw ��S •sa ��e Y nl C • Y M � Y � • � � ti • w V a"o� �E..� �°E" • Y � 9 " i V s E �� ioE� .. � r ■ �soo r�iae s� r�s •OF�Y .°:Y o� r•�a N� L�.� 6 � : N �r �.� _ s:� � a E= O �°.a� :,�: � � � 52 • . 9 � � � � r � � � w � � a� M8 i a �i �� s 0 M s � � � � O wr O C O ' 8 �� a� . : �... Sw �8: . �� :� � 8� �■ Y • V ,� s . .. w r • � � N . �. ve i a � oe M O • 1 � 9s M r • � G • � Y C � �i3; �� c�=: a�g� ��=fs .-�II 3. « a � � �3 ! 3 � � e � .. � Y � a� �i �� ; a � i � .� �� x � � s. s� �g �� `P` � O O � M L �a �� 0 �= �: M V � f 8� 0 M � � '�w u Y •u i� � • .r� �7 �v _i�� ' N!w p a _ ^ � � � 54 � . : � � r � � � e � Y � aa � M �e � �� i Mt ` A« 4 � Y : .s �8 � C ss` �_ ., r i� ..a; s.: O• F O .�i = V Y L ` N � �5 �� ! Y O • Y `E a �og � �e 8 C a� e=: Y Y .. . � ti$C O w . w • � Y 6 � a s� Y Y • O s° : ; Yyx c :�` �'S •L N O � � M � � L r q � P L � Y N 3 • i:. �� O w i w► M � C M � Y G • / N Y wea� ^ � 55 s� � � �� M � � N ` : � � i w i g r �� . Y 8L � L wa� Y pO � ` � � e� � P � ; O Nt Y L � �� S8w ! O � sY .. a f � � $ w is � �a � �` w . � • Y � i�� s� aa� � • s� .8 rz �� N O C � ✓ a� �F e�$ «G � � �. 56 lE�D lU: JoAn Flora, public Vorks Director ME!!C FROY.: Jla AoDinaon, Planning Coordinator Mg}t DATE: July 3T, 1985 R�AFLINC: Fridley Resider,t;e1 Energy Conservation Pro�ect The Fridley Reslder.tial Enersy Conservation Pro)ect (F. R. E. C. P, ? is now� de��elopeC to tGe point yl�ere Co;uicl] revSev and ap➢roval of key ecc�oner.t: is neeCeC. I am enciosing material for autF,orSzation to prceeeC yhir� Sr,clude� a reso.ution, copies of a�ee=enia vitt. utilities, �pecitications for Hocse Docior contractor ar,d a map rith �cheCcle for the SeigAborhood Ener6Y Yorkstops. Apprwal at L:e August Sth Council meeting �ould enable us to proceeC Sr. a timely aanner. �:t.t this reso:�tion ve are re,uestir,g apprwai of ite prograt, the DuCEet, the a�tY.orization to sign ag�e�ents y1tt; tte utillty comparles ar.d tc .ake tS�e nece�sary nteps to eontract �Stt a qua:ifiEd contractor. Neget;ztions l;ave Deen successfuily oo¢;leted vltt. pott Y.innega.cc ar.d 6`_'i. Upor. Cocr,cil aFprovu of tte reso.utlor, �tafP �ill exeeute tt.e atCact.eC contracts vit�. liinnagasro to fund the House Doctor Pro�a� ar.0 �Stt h�r for tte He:�;po�hooC Energy Morkshops. The House Doctor prograe xlll provide lw cosi veatF.erization i¢;,rcvecer.'.: for approxi¢ate:y �D lov ar.0 moderate incoae househclds. After Councl: approval of ihe enclosed apecificatlons, ve w!11 De proceeGir.g �itL ttE r�ecessary steps to hire a eor.tractor to p�rform V,e House Doctor prcgraL. 2he Neigt;borhood Energ� Workshops �111 De he:C on tCree Saturdays tC1� Fa?1 end vi11 be oper. to a11 Aoceor�rs regarCle�s of ir.eoae. The foccs cf tte prograc Ss on oost effective eriergy say;r,g veatherization tectr.iques vh:c� iodividuals ean use on their wr. bcaes. � Ye are planning CCree vorksLops tbis Fall, concer.trating or, ttree oelghborhoods ir. the cer.ter part of tbe City. Attached Se a may of tke �arget area� anC a c�lenGar ot' meeLing dates. Ye ctose thla area for c:.r Snitial thr�t duo to the poter.tiai for good participation. Baned ur. tt.� atrer�th of tbe plock captaic netvork and the centralized location of c�ry older D�es ve feel Energy iiorksLops vould be successf4; ir. tLis are�. r JLR/dc FS-BS-6 9 A�SQ,OTI�i N0. - 1yB5 APSQ,U7ION SO PADCEED YITH 2liE FAIIY,E2 RFSIDENTIIL t1fi8GI COYSER9ATION PRQIEC! YHEREAS. the Minnesota PuDlic Otilities Commis�lon (MPUC) bas passeC legislation vtich allars Lhe local puDlic utlllties to distriDute Conservation Iaprwecent Pro�ac (CIP) monies to participatiag municipalities (City of fYlCley) for tt.e aupport oT ener� oon�ervation programs; and YFiiPEJS. tl�e FriCle� Ener6y Pro�ect Coaalttee ar.d ihe P1annlnE Coao:ssicr, suyport tCe Fr1C:ey Aesider,tia: Conaer-vation Pro�ect (F. A. E. C. P. ); ar.0 YHf:PE�. the FrlCley Aesidential Energy Con�ervation Project Aas a Hocsc Doctor coaponer.t r�.ich is partially fundeC by Minnegasco and a NeiEhborhoo� Enerp� MorksAcp oomponer.t vtich Ss partially llu�deC try NSP; and YHFAEfS. the funLng froc tte above mer.tioneC utilities is con:ir,ge': UpOf. Ct:E execution of agree�er.ts DeWeer. the Ci[y and the utillty coepurles; ar.d YHEREAS. the Houae Doctor co�poner.t vill require hiring a contractor tc perfo.� �eatt,erixation for Sncoae e11g1C1e resldentn. N�', 'hiF�EeOtiE. BE IT R�Q.VEC by the City Council of tt;e City of Fr:C:ey, tc au:horize the fo:lwir.g: 1. 7he prcgrac eor.ce,t ar.d ir.te:.: as prwldeC for ir. eact, of tLe aEreccer.:: be5;eer. Lhe City anC the utiiity coepa�les. 2. Sta.*f to execute those ag��er.:s vith Lhe util:ty co¢�r1es. 3. Apprrnz; of tt:e Dudge:s for eacY. prcgraL �Lich Snclude ct�lity ¢cr.iec, Departaer.t of Energy anC Econocic Developaer.t grar.t mcr,ies ar,d FriC:eJ moni es. L. Staff to prcxeC vitY. the neee�sery steps tc ecr.tract �itY. a qua.ifieG contractor to perfora HoLSe Doctors. PA.SSED At�: ADO�ED HY 7iiE CITY COUNCIL OF TFE CITY OF FkID:.E`.' 1}iL DA`.' Cf' ---- 7 9 — • ii:�LiAt! J. NEE - Y�F.YOR AT7ESS: SIIrif:' C. IN!l1�t� - CI?Y Q.II?P. 3!7/2/2C =.W. TARGET AREAS ls[ Area Sepc. 28, 1985 2nd Azea Oct. 26, 1985 3rd Area Nov. 23, 19E5 . r•• s r��_i• . �i y. . _ _.._. __. �� ' '_ � � :..; � . __ '-�.i -= -- :±+ns �-� os*�c�� .. •':� —¢" �.� _� \ �. _ ___1 I - ; _ .._ � _ _ I � ', i =-= •:;�_ , • - - - --a.:_ �_ . . � F j = i j eoa_ ri , _ = ^ .. ~ ,\ _ _- I ^:��1 -- -= i =- � �� .- -- =- . �, . �' . � � � 1- � _ ' = I _`_r.l . _ _ _ � � ._ �� `� . � �� ' =__ ' . "" �.` � . �� — : - - . _ _ `'t+, - , _. - � '- i'-� =rj _ � ,� I �_.: . /- _ ._ � = _- ik -�•o�. : �, _ _ ' °d -" � _ t, i ' _ ^� . � " ."\ _ _ � P i r �•, i - ' � � � i i 1 /.��' - 1�"' .' � �I M�..�:,�E ��'^ :p ''1 _ � _ ) I p+�l i � r` "� - � � � 1=�-- - � -- -�D� `- � o s __:i _ _"�� _ � _ow . '� �• !�y ,. _ � -- ' ' �. ��.�:'r.`.� -- _ ' , ' - ' � �- �-r` - -- t � , :�}f'1St�efe� a�.: _ ,-- � 2nd area ; ,p� �. , :;: =- � •��:� �r!•i�al:•�•S.`.': y. � . �li .c •�: . _ 591 houses: :892 fiousesy;. - �o;, �• � F �� , 3rd area = ' I / �� t': ; 470 houses � I _� � , ._+• _ ^.. :� - - - . __ • . I �, -- �oii o - f'_ ou__I _..' � ;� � . `` -,l. � -�/ ; „e.� '`, _;-- � � � _ 1 _ � ��-• � , l j ; _ _ L _ � . . .ti - Y: . �;_�Olf � � . �. ' 'r P�� 'r- �� o — , . � - �� = - ' _ - �� _ _ di: � � - -_ � .'.' s -�- r: �_ -- ��- - - '' � -' _ ' - � :� ,,�� - �jj �ola � _- - �. ___� � `�� . �. -- � _ �: , ; � ... _ - � _ � = �-'; _�-- .� _... ; _� _:__ m._...- _- _ _= I c �,�. : '', I c �_ � ' . � . c s : � �. _ ' � � ms. = , � = -7 _ c . - _' . � t� _ � _.. : � _=:n -_ ___ I s , � L F � _ _ __ ' _ r _ : �' r__:• - _ _ __' : '_ c . i _ � £=l _ —.i`-= �:-:-_ _ c-.. . r_ . i � . . c ' c - '. �_ � 1 = - � ;-' . I � . _ z�r.: " "' '"" �• � I � �''. ,'. E°.. __ E_ �E E :�.: �"_ � - i-/ _ __._. . � ' � _� g � _'' �/' c . ' z _ _c �_�' c s _�' L:: -r c' '- � i . .- _ _"- . E_�_ 2 $ii� _ _ .��. s"+ � D - , =-:: = _ -_ __. -` _,_.-= _ =- �:.. _ :_ _: =_= - _ -= :-. __:. _ :=;= : _=:. -_ _:; . :_;� - __ - - ,iTREET MAP-C�TY OF = _� FRIDLEY -= _ --- - - -�-�-- -- ==_- � ��II �'�) (�� I(II p 1f� w � w I I I I I I ,�� i �. �� ;, � 1 ►��i� � �±� ° �' ti � � ' i � � �� '�,� � ! �': cv o�_ cti �3 � I W�/� i� j�j T�� i�� / • w �� I ��1 �� Q� � � Q7 w a`\j� CV � I�' I _� �� ; i;� �� ti �'ti=i � � �-�- ��i�� . ,�. ' Illi�,�l?�II�.;,�' � I �' � �}� W.� II w I� w I� w �l I I � ti � R� I �1 I, �� I � � � � _ai °� I�I , �� . � w' �? � �, �� 1 � II�I �� '��I ,�� . ' � i Exhibit D � � �3� �� W�� `� � - �'i W. I �;�,, Q;� � � � �� , l,j �� hw. 1 � III� IIII �!-1/ �,il �� 'i�� II! ,,�� c� �� i� T� ii��l ,► � t� �ly�il 1'!� I`Y�� 1 �� , �r"'1 �i II �ITi� I I �� w . CV i , II��TT�..,i�ii W��i � �: II) _ W� I 0�11 Z�IiI�� il� I ��II i(il i.�� -r � � ; �+ , P C� C C � � y ✓ {1 V V W = S C i� O �e r � u c om ou U Y N 4.1 O� x m „ �� Z i G tJ S m n 0 c � � �� o V � � � P � u u � M W u o�v r, o 0 � .+ o do� ,.� � 7� {! L L N p� W 2 = ,,, d � W W S = 6C CITY OF FRIDLEY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEE7ING JULY 1 , ] 985 - - . CALL TO ORDER: Vice-Cfiairperson Scf�reiner called the July 1, 1985, Parks & Recreation Cormnission meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present Members Absent: Mary 5chreiner, Dan Allen, Dick Young Dave Kondrick, Steve Nelson Others Present: Charles Boudreau, Parks & Recreation Director Jack Kirk, Recreation Supervisor Mark Burch, Asst� Pu�l�c Wo�ks Director Tom Klein. Knig fs o olum us APPROVAL OF JUNE 3, 1985, PARKS & RECREATION COMMI55ION MINUTES: MOTZON BY MR. YOUNG� SECONDED BY MR, ALLSN� TO APPROVE THE JUNE 3� 1985� PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUSES AS WRITTEN, UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� VZCE-CXAIRpERSON SCHREINER DECLARED THE MOTION CARRZED UNANZMOUSLY, APPROUAL OF AGENDA: MOTION BY MR. ALLEN� SECONDED BY MR, YOUNG� TD APPROVE THE AGENDA WITH THF. FOLLOW- SNG ADDITION UNDER "OTXER BUSINESS": a. MOORE LAKE UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CXAIRPERSON SCHREZNER DECLARED THE MOTION CRRRIED UNANSMOUSLY. 1, DIRECTORS REPORT: a. Girls' Softball Tournament - 49'ers Days: Jack Kirk Mr. Kirk stated the girls' softball tournament was held during 49'ers Days co-sponsored by the City and the fYSA. He stated they had 23 youth girls' teams. They felt the tournament went very well. He siated they had gotten a lot of nice comments on tf�e cott�nunity park facflity. He stated ihey would probably be involved with the FYSA again in helping put on this tournament next year. 2. NEW BUSIWESS: a. Knights of Columbus: Mr. Tom Klein Dr. Boudreau stated Mr. Kleih was not happy a6out tf�e City collecting $150 for the cancellation of tfie Knights of Columbus tournament. He stated that two days in advance, tfie City found out the Knights of Colum- bus was not having their tournament, and this was the cancellation policy PA�KS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 1, 1985 PAGE 2 established by the Commission. He stated Mr. Klein wanted to appear before the Commission and express his objection to this policy. Ne believed Mr. Klein was speaking for himself and not for the Knigfits of Columbus.. Mr, Klein stated he personally felt that the rental rate of $650 for a weekend was too hig�, He stated they could probably have held the tourna- ment with about 16 men`s teams and about 8 women's teams, but they would have been lucky to just 6reak-even. Mr. Young stated that in comparison to other facilities, Fridley has one of the lowest rental fees around, He asked Mr. K?ein if he was aware that last year two tournaments were cancelled, and those organizations were also assessed $150? Mr. Klein stated he was not aware of that. He stated he was just appearing before the Commission to express his feelings. Ms. Schreiner stated the Comnission had spent a lot of time discussing fees, and they felt the fees they had established were fair. Preparation of the fields, administrative costs, setting up the tournaments, all that is taken inio consideration, and tfie fact tfiat another tournament could have been scheduled for tfiat weekend ff more notice fiad been given. She stated the Commission was very sorry the Knights of Columbus had not been able to hold their tournament. Mr. Klein stated he appreciated the Commission's time in listening to him express his concerns, Ms. Schreiner thanked Mr. Klein for coming to the meeting. Dr. Boudreau stated that next year, Staff would like to change the policy on the fee to say t�at the 3700-750 rental fee includes maintenance, for the simple reason that mary groups that come in are not prepared to do the maintenance anyway, and if they do the maintenance and use the equipment that is available, usually the fields are messed up, because they really do not know how to prepa�•e the fields. He felt it was worth the extra $125 for the City to do it. He stated this was a suggestion, and he would like the Comnission to think about it. This could 6e discussed at another meeting. b. Meadowlands Park Prelfminary P1ans & Layout Dr. Boudreau stated tfie Commissioners fiad received tfie oreliminary plans and layout. He stated Mr. Burch, Asst. Public Works Director, was at the meeting to make comments and answer questions. He stated they would like a recommendation from the Cor�nission on which of the three plans or any other plan the Commission liked so that information could be passed on to the City Council, He stated there has been some informal discussion by the City Council on tfie plans, and he believed the City Council was some- what leaning toward Plan "B" wfiich called for little or no change in the PARKS & RECREATI�t1 COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 1, 1985 PA6E 3 location of the facitity and merely the addition of the pond to the park to help solve the drainage problems, However, no final decision has been made on a plan, and tfiey would like some direction from the Commission. Mr. Young stated he would be concerned with having a tot 1ot near a pond area, beca�se sometimes children 5-6 years old are able to come to the park by tuemselves. He stated he liked Plan "A" best because it eliminated some of the size of the land, provided some buildable lots, and yet did not take anything away from the park that is there. If the people want even more open area, they can walk the three blocks to Locke Park. Mr. Young stated that if they do go with Plan "A", instead of having the park- ing lot with access off 67th, he felt it would make more sense to have the parking lot access off 68th, whicfi was a more heavily traveled street, and move the tennis and basketbali down to where the parking lot is. Mr. Young asked if the neighborhood people had been notified about the possible major changes to the park. Mr. Ailen stated that if he were living tn this neighborhood, he would certainly want to be able to give some input about the park. Dr, Boudreau stated the Commission could set up a neighborhood meeting to get the reaction of the neighborhood. This kind of thing has been done in the past. Mr, Young stated that whether through a neighborhood meeting or through the public hearing process, he felt the neighborhood should be involved. Ms. Schreiner stated it was her feeling that when they think about improve- ments to any of the parks, the immediate neighborhoods should Fe involved. Dr, Boudreau stated he would be happy to set up a neighborhood meeting, but it was important that the Commission members attend the meeting also. He suggested the Comnissioners have this meeting at 8:30 p.m. after their regular business meeting on Monday, Au�, 5. The Commissioners agreed that the neighborhood meeting be set for Monday, Aug. 5. Ms. Schreiner stated that if certain individuals are not able to attend the meeting, the Canmission would welcome input, either verbally by tele- phone, or written input. Dr, Boudreau stated fie Would set up the meeting and notify tfie surroundinq neighborhood. c. Minnesota State High School Request Dr. Boudreau stated the Parks & Recreation Department had received a call from Dorothy McIntyre, Associate Director of the Minnesota State High School Associa*.ion. Their requesi is to run a regional girls' softball Class AA tournament in the City of Fridley next year on June 3-4, 1986, PARKS & RECREA7ION COMMISSION MEETING, JULV �, 1985 PAGE 4 with back-up time available on Thursday, June 5. These games would be scheduled during the day time so it would not interfere with the ongoing softball programs. There is a maximum of 8 games to be piayed, all singTe elimination. They are willing to pay tfie rental cost and maintenance cost for a non-profit organization according to the fees establishEd by the Commission. They understand tfiat tfie concession stand will be operated by the City of Fridley. Their only request was that the concession stand be open during tfieir tournament. They wili charge admission to the games, and that profit will 6e theirs. Dr. Boudreau stated this is a non-profit organization tfiat is within the policy and as long as it ts a tournament that will be held during the week, not on a weekend, and will not 6e taking up nighi time, he would recomnend this request be approved, Dr. Boudreau stated one concern raised by Ms, McIntyre was the amount of spectator seating availa6le. The tournament needs two sets of 10-row bleacers on eacfi side of tfie fietd wltfi an additionat section added on each side for the cfiampionship game, Spectators now expect sucfi seating for a state tournament. Dr. Boudreau stated he has discussed this with Mr. Flora, and the 10-row bleachers the Cbmmission 6ad requested earlier are on order, so there will be four 10-row bleachers installed, It will be easy to add in the portable 5-row bleachers to accorronodate tfiis type of tournament. MOTION BY MR. YOUTIG� SPCONDED BY MR. ALLEN� TD APPROVE THE REQUEST BY THE MINNESOTR STRTE HIGN SCNOOL RSSOCIATION FOR A REGIONAL GIRLS CLASS RA SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT ON JUNE 3-4� 1986� IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ESTABLISHID RENTRL FEES AND MAINTENANCE FEES. Mr. Allen stated he felt a tournament like this will be a real "plus" for the City of Fridley. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG RYE, VICE-CXAIRPERSON SCXREINER DECLARED THE MOTION CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3, OLD BUSINESS: None 4, OTbER BUSINESS: a, tbore Lake Mr. Your�g stated tf�at regarding the ftshing pier that was constructed at Mocre Lake, he was quite surprised to see that tfie timbers used for the p�er were treated with creosote, because creosote is a pollutant of water. He stated they have already had a problem in the City with the polr, treating plants polluting the wells. He realized the amount of creosote on the timber was not as much as at a pole treating plant, but wasn't there any other treatment that cou7d 6e used otfier tfian creosote? PAP.KS & RECREATION COhiMISSION MEETING, JULY 1, 1985 PA6E 5 Mr. Young stated his second concern regarding the creosote was that his wife alroost lost her sight as a child because she got creosote on her hands and then touched her eyes. Mr. Burch stated the wood pilings were treated with Pentochlorophenol preservative which is a more environmentally acceptable treatment than creosote. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. ALLEN� SECONDED BY MR, YOUNG� TO AA70URN TNE MFETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON SCNREINER DECLARED THE JULY 1� 1985� PARKS & RECRERTION COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:50 P,M. Respectfully submitted, �e �� ynne a a Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEY ENERGY PROJECT COMMITTEE MEETING JULY 2, 1985 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Saba called the July 2, 1985, Energy Project Cortmittee meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present Members Absent Others Present Dean Saba, Alex Barna, Bruce Bondow, Maynard Nielsen, Bradley 5ielaff, Walt Starwalt, Dale Thompson Glen Douglas Myra Gibson, Energy Coordinator APPROVAL OF JUNE 10. 1985, ENERGY PROJECT COMMITTEE MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to approve the June 10, 1985, Energy Project Cortmittee minutes. Mr. Starwalt indicated that the power vents were a discussion item. Mr. Sielaff asked for an explanation of the Service Plus option which Ms. Gibson provided. Ms. Gibson also indicated that the Service Plus option and the power vents had been overrided by Minnegasco. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SABA DECLARED THE MINUTES APPROVED AS AMEPJDED. 1 P� UPDATE ON HOUSf DOCTOR PR06RAM AND N.E.W. PR06RAM Ms. Gibsan referred to her letter of June 21 to Mr. Worth of Energy Outfitters which states that a homeowner has agreed to have work done through the House Doctor program. The work is scheduled to be done on July 12 and arrangements have been made to have the House Doctor and consultation video taped. DISCUSSION REGARDIP�G THE URAFT PROPOSAL TO NSP Ms. Gibson indicated that Minnegasco did not agree to do N.E.W.'s. Ms. Gibson then contacted NSP to see if they would be willing to get involved. NSP had agreed to do N.E.W.'s; however, their form is somewhat differen'.. Ms. 6ibson distributed copies of a brief description of NSP's N.E.W. program and copies of a draft agreement for review. Mr. Saba asked if a joint agreement was possible between NSP and Minnegasco. Ms. Gibson indicated that they worked separately. NSP will provide 520 for the City to develop their own kit or will provide weather kits for each part- ENERGY PROJECT COMMITTEE MEETING, JULY 2, 1985 PAGE 2 icipating household at their N.E.W.'s, but requires a participation rate per biock or neighborhood or a certain number in attendance. $500 is provided� for posters, banners, models, etc. $60 �aill be oaid for each audit that is completed by an auditor. NSP will provide slides, reproduce fliers and forms, and have mobile home � information available. Mr. Saba indicated that depending on when the program starts the school system could be a catalyst for education about the workshops. Ms. 6ibson stated that NSP has agreed to train two people to run the workshops and wiTl provide a speaker. Ms, Gibson and Ms. Merriam could run the workshops and hdve representatives from NSP and/or Plinnegasco present to answer questions. Ms. Gibson said the City planned to hire two auditors. Another person would be needed for running the model and committee members were asked to help. The block captains may also be asked to participate by signing persons up for audits and distributing weatherization kits. NSP will provide a water heater blanket for electric water heaters where recommended. Ms. Gibson indicated that the agreement with NSP is,at this time,a verbal agreement, and nothing has been signed, but will 6e soon. Mr. Thompson asked the term of the D.E.E.D. grant. Ms. Gibson indicated that the grant is for one year. Funds have been received as a part of the grant. MOTI�N by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Bondow, to authorize signing of the Energy Workshop Agreement with NSP. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SABA DECLARED 7HE MOTION CARRIED UNANINIOUSLY. 3. DISCUSSION REGARDING THE DRAfT AGREEMENT TO MINNEGASCO Ms. Gibson indicated that Minnegasco had agreed to do the House Doctors, but not the N.E.W.'s. � Ms. Gibson reviewed the draft revision of the House Doctor program which now covers only House Doctors. The proposal which will be given to � Minnegasco is for $40,000. Mr. Sielaff asked if the House Doctor program would be focused on the low income and if they would also go through the N.E.W.'s. Ms. Gibson indicated that their may be some duplication. The House Doctor program is geared toward low income households and the work is done without a fee. The N.E.W.'s provide an energy audit at no cost but the homeowner must do the work. Hopefully the House Doctors would reach those people who cannot do the work themselves such as the elderly and/or the disabled. Persons who qualify for the House Doctor program also have the option of attending an N.E.W. ENERGY PROJECT COMMITTEE MEETING, JULY 2, 1985 PAGE 3 Mr. Sielaff asked how much of Fridley would be covered by the N.f.W.'s. Ms. Gibson provided maps showing targeted areas for the N.E.W.'s. The first N.E.W. is planned in neighborhoods 7, 8 and 9. Flyers will be sent out requesting a response back from the homer.�wners. Criteria included in choosing neighborhoods included income, looking at moderate income families, and the number of homes in the neighborhood. NSP can guarantee funding for 3 N.E.W.'s for this ;ear. Mr. Saba indicated that with the inclusion of mobile home parks special materials would be needed in the weatherization kits s:nce standard materials would not be suitable for mobile homes. Ms. Gibson indicated that kits were available for mobile homes but again the participation rate must be met. Mr. Sielaff wondered if the block captains would participate in the energy program. Mr.. Saba indicated that participation by the committee members in the recycling program would also help the N.E.W. effort. He also indicated that participation by the block captains may be aided if the City would somehow recognize their efforts. Ms. Gibson indicated that a total of 80 House Doctors have been tentatively planned as part of the agreement with Minnegasco - 9 have been done, 1 is scheduled, and 70 remain to be done in the next six months or so. Mr. Sata suggested developing:a lisi of auditors for N.E.W.'s, names of volunteers willing to assist, a plan to schedule training sessions and dates of the vro rkshops, etc. Ms. Gibson indicated that she would work to put together e. plan. 4. DISCUSSION REGARDING THE CONTRACTOR SPECIFICATIONS-FOR HpUSE �OCTORS Ms. Gibson passed around for the member's perusal a copy of the proposed contractor specifications fo�' the House Doctor program, The bidding portion is standard for the City of Fridley. Ms. 6ibson indicated that publicity is planned for the city newsletter, the Fridley Focus, and the Minneapolis Star & Tribune. Legal notices and articles are included in the publicity. Mr. Saba suggested checking into a public announcement for cable TV. 5. OTHER BUSINESS Ms. Gibson included in the agenda materials a copy of the Energy and Housing Report. Committee members felt it contained good ideas and discussed some of the materials contained in the Report. ENERGY PROJECT COMMITTEE MEETING, JULY 2, 1985 PAGE 4 Mr. Nielsen distributed copies of the Columbia Heights program for inspections of multiple unit dwellings and the items included at the time of an inspection. He indicated that the fire inspector in Columbia Heights sends a letter to residents of multiple unit dwellings informing them that they cannot disconnect smoke detectors or have extension cords placed out of windows. • He also indicated that Minneapolis requires that smoke detectors 6e hard wired in multiple unit dwellings according to that city's code. Mr. Saba indicated that this was a good program but staffing is required for enforcement. Mr. Sielaff asked about the progress an Energy Project Committee meeting. spoken with Mike Webb of ACCAP. Mr. staff to attend a meeting and that he attending. ADJQURNMENT: of having an ACCAP representative attend Ms. Gibson indicated that she had Webb stated he would contact one of his would let Ms. Gibson know who would be MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Starwalt, to adjourn the meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SABA DECLARED THE JULY 2, 1985, ENERGY PROJECT COMMITTEE MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:54 P.M, Respectfully submitted, � /� � GZ.G�1� (� �. Lavonn Cooper Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEV HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETIN6 _ JULY ll, 1985 CALL TO ORDER: Chafrperson Minton called the July 11, 1985, Human Resources Commission meetinq to order at 7:30 pm, ROLL CALL: Menbers Present: Bob Minton, Sue Sherek, Steve Billings, Harold Belgum Man6ers Absent: None Others Present: Bill Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager Tim Turnbull, Police Dept, Betty Reuther APPROVAL OF JUNE 6, 1985, HUMAN RE50liRCES COMMISSION MIftlUTES: MOTION BY MR. BZLLZNCS, SECONDED BY MS. SHEREK, TO APPROVE THE JUNE 6, 1985, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSZON MINUTES. Mr. Minton stated that on page 7, paragraph 2, second line, the words "it was earmerked" should be changed to "it was not earmarked". UPOh� A VOICE VOTE, RLL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON MINTON DECLRRED TNE MINUTES APPROVED AS AMENDED. 1. OLD BUSINESS: a. Consideration of matters relating to the ethnic background of Fridley residents (Betty Reuther, appearing on behalf of Professor Terry Reuther, Anthropology and Sociology Dept., Anoka Ramsey Co�mnunity College, to present the final report of the Fridley Ethnic Survey conducted by Professer Reuther's students) Ms. Reuther stated that, as the Commissioners were aware, this was put together through the cooperation of the Fridley Rotary Club, the Fridley Comnunity Education Center, and the students from the Extension Dept. of the College of St. Thomas, which was a private college in Illinois, whose clientele are primarily all of adult age. Ms. Reuther stated these interviews were done by the adult students. There were 36 interviews completed, These were done totally on a volunteer basis. I t was not required as part of the anthropology course, but extra credit was given for doing the interviews as it gave tfie students experience in interviewing and ethnography. � ___ _ _ _.__. .._. __._ __ HUMAN RESOURCES COF1MI55ION MEETIN6; �UCV 11, 1985 PAGE 2 Ms. Reutfier stated the names were picked at random out of the telephone book. People were picked primarily from European, Middle Eastern back- grounds, and Third World countries. These were inmigrants who came in basically around three time periods: Around 7900, Second World War period, and fairly recently, Ms, Reuther stated they found out a variety of different things--where these imnigrants tended to go to church, what kinds of social relationships they had found within the community, if they found support groups in Fridley or elsewhere, tvhat kind of customs and traditions they kept from the old country. Of course, they found differences in the different immigrant groups from this. They found significant differences around the "newest wave immigrants" from the Third World countries, partir,ularly Middle Eastern, as most people tended to be much more professional, very welt educated, with basically engineering and medicine type of backgrounds. Ms. Reuther stated these people moved into fridley and typically do r�ot have relatives nearby so they do not have a lot of family ties or 2thnic ties to the area. They find their social ties more in professional organi- zations, that kind of thing. That has differed quite a bit from the earlier imnigrant groups, particularly those who came from Northern Europe and Middle Europe. Ms. Reuther stated she did bring copies of the report which gave much more detail than what she had provided. 5he stated the students seemed to tharoughly enjoy this project and found it a very positive experience. She stated it might be something the Commission might want to look at more closely if they are looking at further ethnic information for the comnunity. Mr. Minton asked if there was a general overall purpose for the study. Mr. Belgum stated the Ethnic Days Festiva7 was started about 5 years ago by a joint effort between the Fridley Parks & Recreation Dept, and the Corrrnunity Education Dept. of Dist. 14. When the people who had been involved became "burned out", they appealed to the Fridley Rotary Club, and the Rotary Club helped carry out the Ethnic Days Festival this year. As it iurned out, ' the Rotary Clubs of Minnesota have as one of thei•r projects a Foreigh ' Student Exchange, so the Fridley Rotary Club invited the other Rotary Clubs in the Twin Cities area to send their foreign students to the Ethnic Days Festival. Twenty nations were represented. Mr. Belgum stated he became acqua4nted with Terry Reuther and asked him if there was any way his anthropclogy class cculd do something for credit that would fit in with the Ethnic Days. Prof. Reuther came up with the idea of the ethnic study so that was how it happened. Mr. Belgum stated the Commission certainly appreciated very much what the study has contributed to the City of Fridley. � HUHAN RESOURCES COM�4I5SIOW MEETIN6, JULY 11, 1985 PAGE 3 Mr. Minton stated the Commissioners should read the report and see if there were any further action or ideas they could glean from it. Mr. Belgum stated that next year will be the rededication of the Statue of Liberty, and the people on the Statue of Liberty Comnittee are looking for ways to dramatize the ethnic mixture of American society because that is kind of what the Statue of Liberty symbolizes. He stated the Rotary Club, in particular, is quite interested in some way of relating to that. Mr, Minton thanked Ms. Reuther for coming to the Commission meeting and presenting the survey results to them. b. Consideration of the use of data involving people in the City of Fridley (Tim Turnbull, Fridley Police Department) Mr. Turnbull stated he was the Public Safety Projects Coordinator for the Police Dept. One of the areas he works in is the area of computer program development for the computer and how it is used in the Police Dept. He stated he would give a little background information on the computer system in the Police Dept. Mr. Turnbull stated that originally there was just one computer system in the City of fridley, and that was a shared system by the Police Dept., Fire Dept., and all the rest of the uses in the City. Originally, the up- graded system they have right now came to the City probabTy in the summer of 1981 (a Texas Instrument system). They shared that system for about three years and then within the last year, they have split the system. Now the Police Dept. and Fire Dept. have their own computer--the original com- puter, and the rest of the City has a TI 990/12 computer. He stated that, to his knowledge, there are somewhere around 25-30 device�, terminals, and printers that are operated on the computer right now. He stated there is not a way to access the information on the Police Department's computer from ary of the City's terminals. Mr. Minton stated the Comnission would have some of the follr,wing questions: (1) What kind of data in general is kept in the data bank and what assurance of guarding that access is there? (2) What kind of process does the Police Dept. go through to determine what new kind of data should be collected? Mr, Tur�bull stated that almost all the data they have and the records they keep are on the computer. There are hard copies of everything, but ail the information is on the computer, and the hard copies are on file. Mr. Turnbull stated there are two basic chapters in the Minnesota State Statutes that determine exactly what information they can capture, who they can give the inforttiation to, and under what circumstances, M.S. 131 is the governmen;. Data Fractices Act and M.S. 260,161 is the chapter that covers the juuenile informatior� which has its own set of rules. Basically, the data they capture is data related to police incidents. That includes specific information such as the time the officer is dispatched, the time the officer arrives, the location, individuals involved, type of incident, and the details of the incident. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETIN6 JULY 11 1985 PAGE 4 Mr. Turnbull stated the access to that information can be looked at on two levels: (1) the fact that the information is physically secured (by locks and doors) and (2} There are certain levels of password or software-type of security on the programs within the Police Dept, that allows certain people to get into various areas of programning. Ms. Sherek asked if there was access to the Police Department's system from an external modem. Mr. Turnbull stated, no, there was not, and he would explain why, He stated their in-house system is a hardwired system. On two of the terminals, they can access the State of Minnesota. There is a dedicated telephone line running from the back of the computer termfnal to the com- puter terminal at the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. From a security point of view, it is not a situation where someone can go to the telephone and dial a certain number and connect into the system. He stated the State of Minnesota does not have access to the Police Department's in-house records. They only have access to the in-house records that the Police Dept, by law has to make available to them. These are records of what they ca11 very serious crimes, Part 1 and Part 2 offenses(rape, robbery, burglary, murder, etc.). Mr. Minton asked if the Police Dept, was collecting any information that was not mandated by the Statutes. Mr. Turnbull stated, yes, such information as suspect information, witness fnformation, victim information, etc. Ms. Sherek stated when the Commission started ta}king about this subject, she thought one of their concerns and the concern she had as she was a security coordinator for a large data base was that under the Data Practices Act, information collected outside the Police Dept. or government agencies is virtually all public record unless specifically included. How did the Data Practices Act apply to the information the Police Dept, collected? What types of information does the Police Dept. collect that is public record? Mr. Turnbull stated that almost all the information that is collected in the Pulice Dept. after a certain period of time is going to be public record. At the time of an incident, there are various levels of classi- fications. If the information fs c7assified as confidentia], that means that even if a person reported the information to the Police Dept., that person,(not the victim, not the witness, etc.) will not be able to go to the Police Dept. and look at the information. The Court will determine who gets to look at the information. For examole, if an incident is under investigation, no one could come in and look at that information unless the Police Dept. O.K.'s it because it is under investigation. The State Statute is very specific as to what constitutes an active investigation versus an inactive investigation. Once the criteria fias been met for inactive, then that information general�y will 6ecome public information, � HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING. JULY 11, 1985 PAGE 5 and any person would have the right to come in and ask for that information and have a copy made of the information at a moderate cost. Also, pieces of information like juvenile records, a person has to go to Court to get that information, but once certain pieces of information which were classi- fied as confidential or private go to court because they are now part of the court record, they might become public. So, the Police Dept, is just like the initial bearers of the information as it moves through the system. but they are governed pretty specifically by State Statute as to what they are required to collect, under w��at circumstances, and who gets to see it. Ms. Sherek asked if they have an age system in place where if information hits a certain age where it is inactive or has been inactive for a certain period of time, it is drppped or do they maintain a perpetual record? Mr. Turnbull stated they have a system whereby they retire information; in other words, they take it off the on-line system and put it on a hard disk and store the information. The State Statute sdys that any juvenile infor- mation has to be maintained until the juvenile is 23 years old; at which time they have to contact the court to determine what they should do with that information, He stated that changes from time to time. There are a significant number of requirements. Mr. Turnbull stated there was a question before the Attorney General's Office right now as to whether or not the computer system in the Police Dept. has to store information and search it in a certain way. The way the law has been interpreted now, they have to search their juvenile information which is stored separately from the adult information, and then they must do a separate search through the adult information. Mr. Turnbull stated that one of the questions they are wrestling with right now is that as they attempt to comply with State Statutes and new legis- lation, it becomes very expensive for their computer system, and the com- puter system was designed to 6e an aid in the Police Dept, to provide quick access to a large volume of information. They are hoping the question before the Attorney General'S Office right now will be that these specific statutory limitations on juvenile records apply to the court system and not to the Police Dept.,which will alleviate some problems for them. Mr. Turnbull stated that as far as security issues, the Commissioner could rest assured that no one was going to be tapping into the system. It is very difficult. Some information comes from NCIC (National Computer Information Center) or the FBI or Interpole. They have to meet certain standards of security in order to be connected to them. Mr. Turnbull stated he had talked to someone at the Criminal Justice Inforniation System who ma,ie the statement that to their knowledge, there has never been a security com- promise in their system. Mr. Turnbull stated that, to his knowiedge, in . their in-house records system, there has never been a security compromise. HUMAN RESaURCES COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 11, 1985 PAGE 6 Mr. Turnbull stated he felt the questions by the Corrmission were well placed, because he thought everyone who is involved with computers is going to continue to be mare security conscious. Mr, Turnbull stated the posture they take in the Police Dept, is they are certainly willing to comply with every aspect of the law, but they want to be sure the information the people are asking for is reasonable and is according to law a1so. Sometimes they have asked people (such as attorneys) to get a court order in order to get certain information. Mr. Minton stated Mr. Turnbull for coming and sharing this information. Mr. Minton stated that at the next meeting, the Commission should start discussing some poticy questions. Ms. Sherek stated she thought the biggest area of consideration they have to have is not with the Police Dept., after listening to Mr, Turnbull, because most of what they are doing is mandated. Mr. Turnbull had reassured them that, yes, data is retrievable based on individuals, but they are not going to hand it out whoiesaie. Mr. Billings stated that sometimes when people want information that is public information, the City sends them to court to get a court order. One of the questions he had was how long is it going to be before someone goes to court and gets a court order that says to the Police Dept. in Fridley that this information is public information and they should no longer send people to the court office in order to get information that is public information? Ms. Sherek stated the �istrict Court in Hennepir� County has addressed this question and has said the court cannot issue a tlanket court order, She believed that question was on appeal right now. She stated it was a valid concern. The point the Commission is faced with is that there is nothing anyone can do about this issue at this time, except to lobby the legislators, Ms. Sherek stated she thought the policy guideline the Comnission needs to be recommending is that the City has to analyze what they are going to do with information, why they need it before it is collected in the first place, And, if they have certain information and do not have a valid reason for having it on the computer, then it should be thrown away. The fact is that information is public record and if it is public record that could be used to someone's detriment, then they should not be keeping J that information unless the potential benefit of accumulating the informa- tion and being able to use it outweighs the po*.ential detriment. Ms. Sherek stated one thing that should probably be required by Central Services of requestors for additional data elements is a clear statemett of purpose. They should make sure the people requesting data elements to be added or accumulated, whether municipal employees or elected officials, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMI55ION MEETING, JULY 11, 1985 PAGE 7 understand that once data is accumulated, it becomes public record, They have to consider not only the potential impact of what happens if new data that is accumulated is being released, but what the potential impact is if it is combined with other data that already exists and then is released. Not only is it important for someone from Central Services (or someone else) be appointed to determine whether the need for the program is valid, but whether each element of data in that program is amply justified, Mr. Billings stated that since this is an area in which Ms, Sherek has more expertise than any of the other Commission members, would she be willing to draft some type of guidelines for the Comnission to review and discuss at the next meeting? Ms. Sherek stated she would be willing to do that. Mr, Minton stated two questions the Comnission should be considerinq are: (1) What kind of criteria should City be considering for the addition of new data? and {2) What consideration should be given to taking some of the data off the computer? c. Consideration of human service needs in Fridley Mr. Hunt stated the Comnissioners had received a copy of the city map which showed the six block groups in Fridley that are designated as low income block groups. Mr. Minton asked if there was anyone else the Commission would like to invite to discuss human service needs in Fridley. Mr. Hunt suggested the Anoka County Human Services Dept. He stated he would see what kind of needs assessment has been done in the area of human services and would try to schedule someone from the Human 5ervices Dept. to speak at the next meeting. d. No-Fault Grievance Procedure Mr. Minton stated that at one time, people from the Human Resources Comnission set up the process for the No-Fault Grievance process and some people were trained to handle grievances� but no cases were referred frrom the State Department of Human Rights for about three years. Earli� this year they got their first referral, and a couple of weeks ago, they got their second referral, and then two days before the meeting, he received two more. Mr. Minton stated he has not been trained to handle grievances, and his main concern was that if more referrals keep coming, they are going to have to reactivate the committee. He stated one committee member has moved out of Fridley, and there a couple of inembers who might not be available, so there is probably going to be a need to have more people trained, NUMAN RESOURCES OOMMISSION MEETIN6, JULY 11, 1985 PAGE 8 Mr. Minton stated one of the cases referred was from the Gazda Moving Co. An employee alleged that she was unfairly fired because she had surgery, When she returned to work, the company had released her, Mr. Minton stated he handled this case and was not able to get any resolution between the two parties so he referred it back to the State Dept. of Human Rights. Mr. Minton stated the second referral was from an employee fro� Medtronic. Mr. Minton stated he spent about an hour with the employee to find out what h4s allegations were. He then called Medtronic who referred him to their corporate attorneys. He was informed that the corporate attorneys would not talk to him until a formal complaint was issued. They did not want to talk about it to prevent a formal complaint, but wanted the formal complaint first, So, he sent that case back to the State also. Mr. Minton stated he has received two other referrals, but has not yet rectived the papers from the State Dept. of Human Ri9hts. Mr. Hunt stated there was probably the need to expand the committee, have more people trained, and have the committee more accessible. He thought the idea was to have a pool of trained people and then assign a case to 1-3 people at a time in order to not cause a burden to any one person. Mr. Minton stdted another factor is that the people from the State who were involved in training people are no longer with the State Dept. of Human Rights, and there is no longer a program, but now referrals are coming through. Mr. Minton stated f�e would like the Commissioners to give this some thought and they could discuss it again at their next meeting. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. BELGUM� SECONDED BY MS. SHEREK� TO AA70URY TXE HEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, RLL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON MINTpN DECLARED TXE JULY 11� 1985� XUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSSON MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:38 P,M. Respectful7y submitted, °-Y=- c,C ynpSaa Recording Secretary r CITY OF FRIDLEY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING JULY 11, 1985 - _ _ CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Commers cal7ed the July 11, 1985, Housing & Redevelopment Authoritv meeting to order at 7:07, � ROLL CALL: Members Present: Larry Canmers, Carolyn Svendsen, Water Rasmussen, Duane Prairie Members Absent: Elmars Prieditis Others Present: Nasim Qureshi, HRA Director Sid Inman, Director of Central Services Dave Newman, City Attorney APPROUAL Of JUNE 13, 1985, HOUSING & REDEUELOPME�dT AUTHORITY MINIIT MOTION BY MR. RASMUSSEN, SECOtiDF,D BY MS, SlENDSEN, TO APPROVE THE JU.'.'E 13, 29E5, HOUSING & REDEVELOPM,ENT Al1THORITY MINL'TES AS WRZTTEN, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHkZRPF.RSON COM.MERS DECLARED TNF. .MOTION CARRZED UNANIMOUSLY, RESOLUTION AUTHORIZI NG A STUDY FOR A PARKING RAMP . - RES01Il?i(1N Nn uR❑ lt_1oS2 CILITY WITHIN THE Mr. Qureshi stated that as was discussed before, the City has a request from Columbia Park Clinic to expand its facility. The City has enough land available to neet city code, but the actual utilization has been much hioher than what the code requires. The Columbia Park Clinic is looking at some kind of ramp facility on the property on the east side of the clinic building. Mr. Qureshi stated there has been some feeling that there is a shortage of parking for the Fridley Plaza Office Building, and that maybe the logical approach should be to take a comprehensive look at ��hat is needed in the area. Also, maybe they could save some of tf�e property for green area west of the clinic that is presently green area. City Staff has done some sketching, but now feel maybe they sf�ould go into more conceptual drawings to nive them sore options to be considered by the HRA and the City. Mr, Qureshi stated BWBR is the architect for the expansion of the clinic. BWBR has given the City a quote of �1500-2000 to do a study. City Staff feels this quote is very reasonable. If the HRA desires to get some further study done in this area, Staff would recommend they utilize &WBR's services to do some con_ ceptual drawings for the facility. HOUSINf & REDEVELDPMEN7 AUTHORITY MEETiNG, JULY 11, 1985 PAGE 2 Mr. Rasmussen stated tfiat in discussions with the owner of Moon Plaza, this person is talking about some remodeting to Moon Plaza similar to that beinG done at Holly Center and putting up an office building, Mr. Rasmussen stated that if the City is going to help � th parking for the clinic facility, where do they draw the line? Are they going to provide parking ramps for all the areas around here? Mr. Corraners stated he was not sure what the status of Moon Plaza was. The lonq range plans put together 4-5 years ago provided for the possi6ilitv of the center being torn dowtt beca�ase of its 000r condition, As far as a oarking ramp was concerned, it was his understanding that wfien they discussed this last month that tfie clinic would be putting in tfie ramp, Tfie City migfit give some assistance but it was his understanding that Colum6ia Park Properties was basically going to $e paying for tfie ramp. Mr, Qureshi stated the clinic has its own needs. He stated there was nothing in writing, but it was his understanding that Coiumbia Park Properties was willing to pay for those needs. He was just saying that at this stage, rather than looking at just putting in a ramp for tfie clinic that t�ey look at the needs of the whole area and provide for those needs. At tfiis time, he was just talking about conceptual ideas and wfio pays for it would be the next ste�. Mr. Rasmussen stated that before spending a lot of money to develop concepts, unless there is some kind of concensus of opinion as to who is going to pay for it, it seemed like putting the cart before the horse. However, he did agree they should probably deternine the needs in the area. Ms. Svendsen asked how the Fire �ept, felt about this. Mr. Qureshi stated it was the feeling of the fire Dept, that there are better sites than where they are located now because of access problems onto Univer- sity Ave. Putting them on 5tfi St. would provide better access. Mr. Commers stated that regarding the possible upgrading of Moon Plaza, there was no reason why they could not work with the owner of that center just like they have done witfi any other development. He would suggest some inquirv be made by staff to see what the plans actually are. Mr, Commers stated he felt $1500-2000 was a re�sonable cost for a studv. He suggested the resolution be amended to reflect a limit of $2000, y Mr, Newman s*ated that also in the resolutton "BRW" should be changed to "BWBR". MOTION BY MR, RASMUSSEN� SECONDED BY MS. SVENDSEN� TO APpROVE RESOLUTIOC7 No.11-19� 1985� A RESOLUTZON AUTHOR722NG A STUDY FOR A PARY,ING RAMP FACZLZTY WITHZN THE COMMUNITY PLAZA AREA,WSTN TXE FOLIAF7ING AMENDMEN2 TO THF, LAST PARAGRAPH: "NOW� THEREFORE� BE IT RESOLVED� TXAT TXE XOUSING AND F2EDEVELOPl4£NT RU2NORITY OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DETERMSNES THAT A STUDY FOR TNE IMPROVEMENT AND EXPANSION OF PRRKZNG FACILI�TIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT SHDULD BE MADE FOR TAE COMMUNITY PLAZR AREA� AND HEREBY AUTHORZZES THE CHAIRMAN AI1D DIRECSOR OF THE HRA TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WZTH BWBR Zb DEVELOp A CONCEPT PLAN FOR A PARXIlTG RAMP AND FZRE STATION IMPROVEMENT� NOT TO EXCEED $2,000." HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, JULY 11, 1985 PAGE 3 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CNAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOmION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. UPDATE ON TRAFFIC CHANNELIZATION OF HIGHWAY 65 AND WEST MOORE LAKE DRIVE/ Mr. Qureshi stated that since the HRA authorized this study, there has been a new development. The Aroaerty owned by 100 Twin Drive-In has been optioned by a company called Woodbridge Properties. It was f�is understandinq that they are in the process of developing some overall conCeptual plans for the whole parcel. Once those plans are submitted, they will be subi*�itting them to the HRA. Tf�ese plans migf�t have some impact on the proposed aliqnment of the roadwav that was submitted to the HRA. He stated the Citv has advised Woodbr- idge Properties that they are in the process of a study, and Woodbridge Properties will be coordinatinn their develonr�ent in conjunction with the study. Mr, Commers stated he would be concerned that if plans are bPing put together for the propertv, that the Citv is not spendinq money for a traffic study that might be of no use. Mr. Qureshi stated the basic design is essentiallv the intersection. How the develoament hooks on to it is flexible. But, they have made Goodrich Properties aware of what is proposed. He would say 90n of the work is qoing toward the intersection and 10; beyond that. Mr. Qureshi stated it was their hope the design would be completed this year; then enter into a joint powers agreement with Anoka County, the Highway Dept., the HRA, and the City, If everything goes well, they will let the contract next year so they can do the actual construction probably in 1987. They need that kind of lead tir�e to accomplish this kind of work. Mr. Commers stated they shnuld continue on with the study. They know the intersection has to be redesigned; and since 90K of the cost relates to the intersection and 10% to how a development hooks in, it made sense to qo forward. The H('.A members agreed. 3. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH GERALD PASCHKE ON LOTS 4 AND 7, BLOCY. 4 Mr. Qureshi stated that on this plat, the HRA already helped Mr. Paschke with 3 parcels. He is asking for essentially the same help for Lot 4 and Lot 7, Block 4, University Industrial Park. The only action required by the HRA o-�as to set a public hearing for their August meeting. At that time, they can further review the details of the agreement. He stated the HRA members had a rough draft copy of the agr�ement for their review, and they can take the appropriate action at the August meeting. MOTSON BY MR. RASMUSSEN, SECOhDED HY MR, PRAIRIE� TO SET A F�BLIC HEAR7.'JG FOR AUGUSS 15 REGRRDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOP.MENT AGREEMENT WITH GERALD PRSCHYE ON LOTS 4 AND 7, BLOCK 4, UNIVERSITY INDUS_TRIAL PARK. HOUSING R RFDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 11EETING, �ULY 11, 1985 PAGE 4 UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOSING RYE� CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTIOh CARRZED UNAIJIMOUSLY. 4. FINANCIAL REPORT: Mr. Inman stated there was no financial report; however the HRA members had received the audited year end report for tFieir review, No action was needed. 5. CHECK REGISTER: None 6. OTHER BUSINESS: a. Proposed University Avenue Corridor Beautification Study Mr. Qureshi stated that the City sent ]] requests for proposals for a study on the University Corridor upgrading and improvement. Five of the 11 consultants responded. The HRA had been provided a list of those vtho had responded. He stated they will evaluate the pr000sals and, hone- fully, talk to the business people who have shown an interest and be pre- pared to give the HRA a recortmendation at the Aug. 8th meeting. b. Possible Conflict of Interest by HRA member or Staff inember Mr. Rasmussen stated he was concerned afiout any potential conflict of interest by an HRA mem6er or staff person regarding involvement in areas that could have the appearance of conflict of interest, either in New Brighton or any neighboring community. Mr. Comners stated the City does have a dl5closure reouirement that c�ty commissioners must sign, He was not sure if that applied to the HRA. Mr. Inman stated he believed both the HRA and the Police Commission were exempt from the disclosure requirement. Mr. Commers stated it might 6e appropriate for the HRA to adopt a resolution of that nature, at least to the extent that tfiey can police it in the City of Fridley. As far as problems in otf�er areas outside the City, he would be happy to discuss this with Mr. Rasmussen and anyone else who has some information on this, and report 6ack to the HRA. He stated he would also ask Mr. Newman to look into the possibility of the HRA adopting a disclosure sinilar to the one the City has for commission members. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORI7Y MEETTNG JULY 11 1985 PAGE 5 AO�OURNMENT: Chairperson Comners detlared the July 11, 1985, Housing & Redevelopment Authority meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, � � ,.. � �, - � �[ � � <•. �` Lynne a a Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEY APPEALS CO��}ISSIOrJ MEETING, JULY 23, 1985 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Gabe] ca]led the July 23, 1985, Appeals Comnission meeting to order at 7:30p,m. ROLL CAtL: Members Present Members Absent Pat Gabel, Alex Barna, Jean Gerou, Jim Plemel Donald Betzold Others Present: Clyde Moravetz, City of Fridley John J, Ripsin, 3300 Bass Lake Road, Brooklyn Center 7om Taylor, 1537 Oberlfn Cir. 5. Leonard Rence, 7628 Brigadoon Place N,E. Cynthia Mabel, 1214 Norton Ave. Don Elias, 739� Concerto Curve N.E. APPROUAL OF JULY 9, 1985, APPEALS LOMMISSION MINUTES• MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY MR. PLEMEL� TO APPROVE THE JULY 9, 1985, APPEALS COIdMZSSZON MINL'TES AS WRSTTEh'. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANZMOUSLY,. 1. VARIANCE REQUEST PURSUANT ps� n, �1r. , 205 OF THE FRI e ITY CODE TO REDUCE �• , roo yn enfer, n. MOTION BY MS. GEROU, SECONDED 8Y MR, BARNA� TO OPEN THE pUBLIC XEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOPI?7G A}'E, CXRiRPERSOti GABEL DECiAP,ED Tt3£ PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:32 P.M. Chairperson Gabel read the A�ninistrative Staff Report: ALi41INISTRR7IVE STAFF REPOt i fi951 Cerstral Aven�e N.E. A, PUBLIC PURPDSE SER'JED BY REQUIREMENT: APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 2 Section 205.18.3.D4.d requires whenever any industrial district is adjacent to or adjoins on any other district, permitted buildings and uses, except automobile parking and loading spaces, driveways, essential services, walks and planting spaces shall not be c7oser to the boundary line of a residential district than fifty (50) feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is "buffer" areas be!ween zoning districts for reasons. B. STATE� HARDSHIP: to provide adequate open aesthetic and development "This location chosen by Medtronics; other sites in the area would adversely affect other uses of total planned facility." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: This building would be constructed in the N.E, corner of the Medtronics parking lot. The building is planned to be 14 feet by 22 feet. If the Board recommends approval, the staff reco�nmends that you stipulate that it have a brick exterior and that a curb be placed around the structure to separate it from the parking lot. Mr. Moravetz stated that Mr. Phil Rustad, 5568 Danube Rd. W., one of the co- owners of a duplex on Norton Ave, fiad called the City. Mr. Rustad had said he did not see any problem with the variance req�est but would like to review the location a little bit more and would call back. Mr. Moravetz stated he had not received another call from Mr. Rustad, and Mr. Rustad was not in the audience. The petitioner, Mr. John Ripsin, stated he was with Evergreen Land Service Co „ a consulting real estate firm, that buys land for utilities when they have an excess need. He stated this would be a single story structure similar to the one put in by Georgetown Apartments. He stated the exterior of the building would conform to the area. Ms. Gabel asked Mr. Ripsin to explain the purpose of the building, Mr. RiFsin explained that the new high tecfinology that Northwestern Bell is going to develop throughout the whole metropolitan area, as we71 as nationally, is going to utilize fiberoptics and digital equipment that will allow them to transmit both visual and voice communication very fast. It is a new technology that will allow for better communication facilities for the whole area, not just for Medtronics. Mr. Ripsin stated this was stationery equipment. The equipment is left in the building, and there is an equipment operator who checks the equipment maybe once a week. There is very little activity in any of these types of facilities. Ms. Gabel asked why this site was chosen, APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 3 Mr. Ripsin stated this site was chosen because it is in the middle of a service area for Northwestern Be11. It was chosen because Medtronic was agreeable to leasing this particular piece of property in this location to Northwestern Bell. Ms. Cynthia Mabel, 1214 Norton Ave., stated she was a h�meowner of a single family home. She asked why this building had to be on this site. She stated she felt there were other locations on the parking lot that would be just as suitable away from the residences. She stated the reason for city ordinance is to protect homeowners and their property values. She stated she was definitely opposed to this building in this location. Mr. Don Elias, 7390 Concerto Curve N.E., stated he owned property at 1240-42 and 1250-52 Norton Ave, He stated ordinances are for a purpose; and even though he had �o real objection to the building, he felt the City should stick to its ordinances. Mr. Barna stated he would like to see a full plan of Medtronics' total planned facility, because this location did not seem like the best place for this building. He could see some visual affect along Central Avenue. The building at Georgetown Apartments was completely invisible from anyone except a few residents in the southerly building. This building would be sticking right up towards Central Avenue and would 6e visible to everyone driving by. Ms. 6abe1 stated there has to be other areas around a given vicinity where a building could be located. She was very much opposed to putting this type of facility this close to a residential neighborhood. Mr. Ripsin stated there were other sites. One was down along the railroad tracks by the transmission line, but the transmission line would interfere with the operation of the facility. They also talked to Onan, and Onan was willing to give them a site, except Onan has to dig up an area because of the creosote pit from the old pote company, Mr. Barna asked if it was necessary to be close to Central Avenue. Mr. Ripsin stated, yes, it was. He stated the telephone cables run along Central Avenue. It becomes more costly the farther away they get from the telephone cables. Mr. Barna stated he was also opposed to *_his building being so close to a residential neighborhood. He couldn't see why this facility couldn't be closer to the Medtronics building as actually Medtronics and Onan are going to be the major users, He could not see why the major users were getting the less impact. He would feel more comfortable if this was more to the south side of the parking lot. Mr. Plemel stated he felt parking lots are never very beautiful. He could see why Medtronics would want the facility located on this corner, and he could not see where this low building would cause any visual harm. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 4 Mr. Plemel stated Northwestern Bell could build this building 40 ft. farther south wifihout a variance. Would that really make that much difference as far as visuaT poTlution? MOTION BY MR. PLEMEL� SECONDED BY IdS. GEROU� TO CIASE' 2HE PUBLZC HEARING. UPONA VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL bECLARED SHE PUBLIC HEARZNG CLOSED AT 8:09 P.M. Mr. Barna stated he could only visualize other telephone company substations he has seen which iook like big brick buildings, and he just did not feel this would be a very appealing-looking building, Since he did not have Medtronics' site plan and did not know what other areas there were where this building could be placed, he did not feel he was in a position to grant the variance, Ms. Gerou stated she felt the building was too close to a residential neighbor- hood, and with the neighborhood opposition, she would vote to deny the variance. Ms. Gabel stated she also was opposed to the variaroce, because she did believe city ordinances had a purpose and that purpose was to protect the character of the residential neighborhood. She �elt there was room on the parking lot to put the building elsewhere. She did not think there was a defined hardship, and again she felt perhaps it was encumbent upon the heavy telephone users in the area to cooperate in some way to bear the brunt of the building, rather than the people who will benefit so little, MOTION BY MR, BARNA, SECONDED $Y MS. GEROU� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL DENIAL OF VARZANCE REQUEST PURSUANT � CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE YY7 REDUCE THE SESBACK OF AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ADJACENT SD A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING FROM 50 fiEET TO 10 FEET ON THE SE I/4 OF SECTION 12� TOWNSXIP 30� RANGE 24, ANOKA COUNTY� THE SAME BEING 6951 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E, (MEDTRONICS PAF2KING IAT), UPON A VOZCE VOTE, GABEL� GEROU� BARNA, VOTING AYE� PLEMEL VOSING NAY� CXAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRZED. Ms. Gabel stated this item would go to City Council on Aug. 5. 2. VARIANCE REQUEST PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF 7NE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDtJCE 280 STONYBROOK WAY. (Request by David Ko�cl�; Z80-�tony�roo �Way,�dley, n: MOTION BY MR. BARNA� SECONDED BY MS. GEROU� TO TABLE TXIS ITEM UNTIL THE AUGUST 13TX APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING AT THE REQUEST OF THE PETITIONER. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAZRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 23, 1985 3. VARIANCE REQUESTS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205_OF THE FRI � �1 ' �1 : ' / •�•' •�, ,. , `. .' 1 Ir •� •1 �1'. 1 .'. 1 1� 1` •1 •1� 1 ' ^ :1 1 � ��. -�.. �11 1- ��1, 1� 1 ��1 1 1 1��,. � 4 :11 • � •.• . .. :11 � � � , MOTID^7 BY MR. BARNR� SECONDED BY M.S. GEROU, TO OPE77 THE PDBLIC HEARING. [IPOV A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHRZRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLZC HEARING OPEN AT 8:14 P.M. Chairperson Gabel read the Administrative Staff Report: ADMINISTRATIVE S7AFf REPORT 7800 Elm Street A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERUED BY REQUIREME�dT: Section 205.18.3a requires that a lot area of not less than one and one-half (1-1/2) acre is required for one (1) main building. Public purpose served by this requirement is to avoid the condition of overcrowding of an industrial neighborhood, Section 205.18.3c,1a requires that the maximum percent of the area of a lot allowed to be covered by the main building and all accessory buildings is forty percent (40n) maximum. Public purpose served by this requirement is to orovide for adequate parking, open landscaped areas, and to limit congestion of industrial areas, Section 205.18.4d.2 requires two side yards, each with a width of not less than twenty (20) feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide adequate open space areas around industrial structures for aesthetic and fire fighting purposes. Section 205.18.5c.1 and Section 205.18.5c.4 require a minimum of 13 parking spaces for a 5600 square foot office/warehouse building (50'� offtice - 50°o warehouse}, Public purpose served by this requirement is to allow sufficient area for all expected employee and customer vehicles to 6e parked on the property and not on the public street. 3 APPEALS C�4MISSION MEETING, JULY 23, 1985 PA6E 6 6. STATED HARDSHIP: "Lot size is less than required, but we are locked in by existing buildings. We need a building 80' by 70' to accommodate storage and office needs. Other buildings have limited parking in the area. We do not anticinate need for additional vefiicles needing parking spaces." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: The parcel is only 80 feet by 135 feet (the size of a normal residential ' lot) causing the request for all the variances. The parcel cou]d be combined with the sites to the north or soutfi for their possible expansion. If the Board recommends approval of the side yard variances, it should stipulate that the wall adjacent to the side lot line be constructed to a 4 hour fire rating with no openings. Variance to parking stail numbers is critical since the code allows no on-street parking. Mr. Moravetz stated he would like to reiterate the staff concern of the lot area, the obvious parking shortage, and the fact that either building to the north or south could eventually expand and utilize the two lots in question. Mr, Tom Taylor, 1537 Oberlin Circle S., stated fie was representing Jack Lindahl, the petitioner. He explained �4r.Lindahl's plans to add a building to accommo- date storage and office needs. Mr. Plemel asked how many more people would be employed because of this planned expansion. Mr. Taylor stated that not more than one or two peop7e would be hired, so there will not be the need for increased parking spaces. Mr. Barna stated they were looking at two separate properties, so there was the possibility that if the business in the existing building moved for what- ever reason, this proposed building could be sold off in the future, therein creating the parking problem. If they were considering it a separate building, it had to be supplied with adequate parkinq, If the petitioner was going to make it all one long building, then it would be completely different. Ms. Gabel asked if Mr. Lindahl would be willing to plat both properties as one parcel. Mr. Taylor stated he did not know, Ms. Gabel stated that if this was all one parcel, it would cfiange some things. It would seem to make more sense to have it platted as one parcel, Ms. Gabel stated that if it was one parcel, there would not be the need for all these variances. She stated that if at some point in time, the petitioner sells the new building, there will be no parking and it would not meet any code, The City Council may very well say the two properties have to be tied together. APPEALS COPIMISSION MEETING, JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 7 4 Ms. Gabel stated she felt this plan was not very well put together. She would suggest Mr. Taylor talk to Mr. Lindahl again to see if Mr. Lindahl would be willing to combine the parcels and then come back when the plan is more put together. She stated it was her opinion there were too many variances. When there is a piece of property that needs all these variances including parking variances and a large increase in lot coverage, that says something is wrong with the piece of property, She stated 51% was an excessive lot coverage variance. If the Appeals Comnission were to approve soMething like this, they would only create more problems. Combining both parcels into one tax parcel wou7d eliminate a lot of problems. Mr. Taylor stated he would be willing to have the Appeals Comnission table the item in order for him to go back and talk to the petitioner. MOTION BY MS. GEROU� SECONDED BY MR. BARNA� TO TABLE TNIS VARIANCE REQUEST. UPON A VOICE VOTE� RLL VOTING AYE� CH&ZRPERSON GABEL DECLRRED THE MOTZON CRRRIED [7NAHIMOUSLY. CHAPTER 214 OF THE fRIDLEV CITY CODE TO INCREASE MOTZON BY MR. BARNA� SECONDED BY MS. GEROU, SO TABLE THZS ZTEP.^ UNTIL THE AUG. 13TN APPEALS COMM15SION MEETZNG AT SHE REQUEST OF THE PETZTIONER. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. VARIANCE REQUEST PURSUANT TO ChAP7ER 205 OF TNE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDUCE SI .�.> n.Af�3Y') MOTION BY MS. GEROU� SECONDED BY MR. PLEMEL� TO OPEN THE PUBLZC XEARZNG. UPONA VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE� CHAIRPERSON BABEL DECLARED TNE PUSLZC NEARING OPEN AT 8:39 P.M. Chairperson Gabel read the Administrative Staff Report: APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 8 ADMINISTRATIVE S7AFF REPORT 7628 Brigadoon Place N.E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIRFTIENT: Section 205.07.3D.2a requires a side yard of five (5) feet between an attached accessory building or use and side property lines. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide space between individual structures to reduce conflagration of fire, to provide access to the rear yard for emergencies and to limit the congestion of crowding in the residential neighborhood. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "Removing of deck from said property would decrease the value of t�e house and change the appearance of the said property." C. ADMINIS7RATIVE STAFF REVIEW: The deck is existing. It is about 30" from the ground (see City letter dated 4-11-85). If the Board approves this request, we have one stipu- lation to make, that it be understood that the deck can never be enclosed or converted into a three-season or other living space. Mr. Moravetz stated staff had no objection to the variance, other than the stipulation mentioned in the staff report. Mrs. Leonard Rence stated that when they purchased the house, the deck was already on the house, but it was not very wide. They asked the contractor if he could widen the deck 3 ft., and he did so. She stated they were not aware the deck did not conform to code until they checked with the City when their neighbor decided to put up a fence. Mr. Rence stated none of their neighbors object to this variance. MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY MR. PLEMEL� TO CIASE SHE PUBLZC HEARING. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CNAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED TXE PUBLZC XEARING CZASED AT 8:54 P.M. Mr. Barna stated it was not actually the property owner's fault that the deck was built as a non-conforming deck. That responsibility would go to the developer and buildinq contractor. This was not a self-imposed hardship, and there was a definite hardship because the deck is existing. The actual living area of the property to the north is at least 20 ft, from the property line so as far as accessibility in case of fire, that should be more than satisfactory. He stated he had no objection to the variance. APPEALS COMMI55ION MEETING, JULY 23, 1985 PA6E 9 Ms. Gabel stated she had no objection to the variance. This was something that was not done deliberately, It was definitely up to the contractor who added on to the deck to check on the building code. She stated this was just a matter of housecleaning to bring the deck into code conformance. Ms, Gerou stated she was in favor of the variance. Mr, Plemel stated that since there was no neighborhood objection, he would be in favor of the variance. MOTIDN BY MR, PLEMEL� SECONDED BY MR. BARNA, TO GRANT THE VARIANCE REQUEST PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRZDLEY CZTY CODE TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 5 FEET TO 2 FEET TO ALIAW TXE EXZSTING DECK TO REMAIN ON LOT IQ, BI,OCK 2� BIAMBERG ESTATES� THE SAME BEING 7628 BRIGADOON PLACE N,E., WZTH TN.E STIPULATZON TXAT THE DECK CAN NEVER BE ENCLOSED OR CONVERTED INTO A THREE— SERSON OR OTHER LNZNG SPACE. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADJOURWMENT: MOTZON BY MS.GEROU, SECONDED BY MR. PLEMEL, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERS06' GABEL DECLinRED THE JULY 23, 1985� APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING AA70URNED AT 9:00 P,ld. Respectfully subryitted, , �, � L- ��lC , �� ynne a a Recording Secretary r� _ �.�� ` TY OF OaTt 7/30/85 ptAECTORATE OF PUBLlC WORKS M E M O q A N D UM ►�p� �►,w. John Flora, Public Works Dir. iV��ECf Commission Reviea � o °c Fv� �'J° �-� PW 85-233 t0 Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinat Planning Commission I1 J ��tiDa �w�0 r DRAFT At the July 29, 1985 Council Conference meeting, an agenda item dealt with the Community Development Commission Work Plan. Mr. LeRoy Oquist, Chairman of the Community Development Cormnission was present to discuss his concern about the purposes and long range goals of the Community Development Commission. Last year the Council also had some discussion dealing with the tasks and purposes for the Energy and Environmental Quality Commissions. As a result of the discussion about the Commission purposes, it was determined by the Council that it would be appropriate for the Planning Commission to review the organization, structure and tasks of the member commissions as well as the overall organization of the Planning Commission. The Council feels that the comnissions serve an important role in providing cortmunity input into their analysis and discussions that are processed through the commissions. It is through this resident involvement that we can obtain corrmunity input and a sense of public ownership of the government process. process. Recommend the Pianning Commission initiate a study of the member canmissions in order to establish an organizational structure which would provide responsive recommendations for Appeals, Special Use Permits, Plats, Lot Splits, Vacations and Rezonings; deal with the various human elements of the Community; provide a source of information for the City's environmental concerns; and act as a sounding board for local neighborhoods. It is hoped that from the recommendations of the Planning Commission,the Council could review the identified needs of the community and establish a commission structure which will not only provide advice, but will serve as public participation in the governmental process. JGF:jmo CaiU(JIIY D�IELOPf'Et� C!�11ISSIa! IJOWQ'Ll�� 1932 CO��tItISSIONERS: LeRoy Oquist, Chairperson Ken Vos, Vice Chairperson Sharon Gustafson P,1 Gabel Connie Modig CITY STAFF: Mary Cayan �9 40 COP4�IUNITY DEVELOPMEIJT COMMISSION The Fridley Cormiunity Development Cormiission was established in January 1976 by the City Council for the purpose of "promoting and maintaining high qual- ity comnunity standards to ensure a well balanced and orderly development, rehabilitation and redeveloprient, of the City of Fridley; including, but not limited to econonic development, industrial and conmercial development, hous- ing, transportation services, public utilities, conmunity development projects, and other related development activities�.' (Section 6.151) The scope �f the Comnission as set forth in Section 6 is as follows: 6.152 Scope The CorrQnunity Development Comnission shall act as an advisory Comnission to the Planning Comnission for continuous community planning and development of the comprehensive City goals and policies. Any change in related comnunity planning and can- prehensive City goals and policies must be reviewed by the Planning Comnission who will then make recomnendations to the City Council. The Comnunity Development Comnission shall advise the City Council, after a policy review by the Planning Canmission, in the development of programs to give increased effectiveness and direction in implenenting established City goals, poli- cies and frar�ework, and recortmend actions as needed relevant to the physical development of the City. In order to fulfill the responsibilities mandated by the City Council, the Community Development Corrunission has chosen the following goal areas to focus upon in 1982: Canmunity Development Block Grant Housing Comnunications Neighborhoods C O Z Q N Q J Q u z U W 1-� > H C O C 6 4 � O N d � u� � Y b � L D 1 V N �% a w N �+ c O V1� Y d �� v .. ai w. �- �r v �. > � � Y L N P N C t W Y L � 9 L � C v C � O • N C � O1N q q d d O N � u � R J d �+ G� U w Y C C U p O � L C m �u �o 0 � L o u q O • s� • N V+t w T >. O T C O L C�+ C� G q C Nr p� 0! Q C C C C� c a e� q� o g � W � U � U N W C!� N L ' OG W d m G �+ rq LL Nt M�N pi� Ny W~ LG q c u o > A E L C L L q C w �.- n d L • W d W U C O Y�I Y J �J N U N� Ol 'J N J O! •� C E 2 O C r G vl L � N � O V m p iA N u a a c c � .� r �iu �ov Y J � 4 O� pf L �r N O O L � W� C L O U �a +� r j i� q N • 61 N G 0�9 a c c O �O J rCLW = C u � �m L 2 C O d d mU L + AdFo 4� ?. N W H � W CI � T �1 • E C N O� �iou�� W 2� J �6 W�r OLL wC� �r0� J GU'� 61 OI�] O i YI d O W q � �O JJ�(,J Z J � N q� � m � ^ ' Y C O tJ !� N � m L L � > O 2 L O W • N +� C V O C Y O �e u c a. dE N y C 1 O t� N w— Y E �+ E � O = U w � L .� p C d 9 L '- 1 6 a c 0 c W � m O 4..1 � C• P N � C O � � LL � T Y C �E E L a od LL L N � V Lo G O O > O L G O Y w u N C O O� C O L N N W � �p+ � O 6 L 61 6 L m T O L u u � � m A P Y LLg i� O > �a .� � U C V O U f L O Y N �.1 � E m 0 U � R 41 � 0 W u z a � a J Q u z s u � C C C O � g �' � D O � �i c � � O O O ^� N I �-' G o T 6J.�.-. C N � �O N L O C Gl W N �y V n C V T E � � q � � O C � F �+ p y d C l d O 3 1r E'S O� N�J W Z L O c v P° n�n o9a�+ C� �CL ]�O�U O L O �+ G� V'^� N O C O C O W q Y N � W q L .+ —ucn c c n a. a a �--- r� • L U N O~ N T.s n m c � E q E N O O C O N K O a T U 6 C � � uE � c c u rn r o y E W Y� T N 2 6 p/ W C d G O C O G C 6' L� 6' NL Q� C.� � N f'1 N � � Z i c A C J v � y N �a U L �+ O� �r C 1 M ° ° Y 6 O � L O Ca O C r- N �r � O d �+ �J+ N 1p C a+ O J C O�+ 6� c��l vo°— y q 6 N au NI W O l =I L ' I C C V r' Y! N V o �� O O O L f L W 4 €' � I c g' t o a � i P C � f O O ' O O E W i �+ G O O C �O on .+u ' � N E� 10 N N o �r v'=."+ o u r �Y 60U �O O N v-�� c� d v ip �.- 1- O � q L �q:_ �� €d WMYI ✓I]� C� wv �.v v�o ��+�n c— urnu qE —i C-N N`�L �4 N U t O� q O CE Y �G'` 6' E� O CE y L� V C W L Y N C au E c�n + Oi �n v y q�� 7 7� O N C o P E i C c� C w �. N P1 Y x E L� P c �. i .- O � � C �+ L O�L q L L q �C nY c J V N O V p �n L M 7 O� N W C y r W � N O Y J O O C l L O 6 � O�a+ O C q H � C N m N q y' C �[ S O � U � 6 N wvv � L N W �+ O � m C O u u u d w � � � � o g N N N W �O Y C' C N w a c N C O y.� � . L N � G] 6� V¢ d O N S L S U .+ A T l y V O L N C G �+ io O J � 2 U N O � N g' v� O G A 'v d O N h YI W �+ 9 C > > O �' L L n0 G O n r O � '!� g � W W us z— c� �o N W � � 2 J ti a� V �+ C 2 O 2 W u z W � H W o g' d J M�E^ W Q C G O N G C � s N N LL q W 1 1 1 1 O Z C L f��+ L P !� H 7a=��' > o i N` O � ¢ u z o� �� c 0 {a Y q N � • ' � V N � L �+ C � w � «^ � d� � 61 �« U N N T t! q } T U io W N � 2 �r C q 0o z ^ N N L � c w a+ v a+.� n i �i � n . v LL > O N d L U T V � Y O W L > W 2 p L C N O N N C N Y ~ U J i L T'^ N q n � a u'v � z ✓yi 6 � E Z � N t�1 Q �r C O L d C O d P r �+ o uoE L �+ O y C q 'r L �+ W � w a l � T in N O1 C C� O O L � � M F LL A y I C C {�a�o .+ u �.+ o u u �. .- �e o w y s c u N W O O Np+ oi� � �e c 0 2 f N � V N � N J y V � t � �' v o � u i,' j �+ j Y W � > r { yV N � a ��u �u� q �O L � 1 � E ^ D� Y C W q r Y > N � O q a c a� ^C L — u N !� C M q� �i u d •Z 8 ~ L O N � E � E n 6 r N N C T W N N q Y vua. v w �- W � ! L 9 OO� t E L C La L D D �r �w O N � L 4 L Y Y ai l' J Y Y L O O � N L O � � G L G W L W D L C C C LL a f E � E�� E 9 O L �+ O ?� p Y �F 10 N N • O � Y � _ �d 4 g r ]� N ' ^ P �O q L O L 9 v r U Y G A P Y N T c c � w ` G p �O L _ C c n w � c C � L T ^ � C V O a u � � Q �r n � L �� N- d y C q r Y W W C d U N F iO t L�+ Y O C 9 O � L� � C! d C N N V Q N + q p �O E C C � � N L N C�+ q� p p�� ✓ v 6! O L O N L 6 N � p' N q U 4! 0= W 6 � N �'f O Jt W W w L q O �+ �+ • V N N L {. W �+�.W N�a+L �+ 2 � E �+ U 6� ' � � ' � v i o u u� V C q NE l C .— O C O ia L L�� U GG> — � O �6 V C L � p N 01 N � � M C N W L G C N Cl p iO+L �+ P �+ E N L r Q) W O V E � 43 � 0 W W U OC 2 � a� � N W � � J Ha U F .-. C 2 O S � u z W � H t d LL r 1 C� W O L 0 .+ o $ CE L i S t LL L { N L D C P L I U u C V L O N L C � W D N N �r L W N L O O C �r ^ � W ' Y � N N G�r � ' g � Nv T O d U N O D A O O L L GL U O n N O f a �i • � • �n a ^ a,r � � � �r > .� h� d d W m d� N� d R' C N C 1' N p C p � N f7 Q N O O Lp L L O� Y C T w M C Y O � � L L � P a�+NL N q C O� G J O S�r W O d O C S 9 G' N � O N O C C N 0 W W N N s � �p u � N O O S W C� O 'L W W Lp > L O O W O O F-OGL L d G n � .+ � N 1 � � N L P C� d 4 O Q N � � q J L d N O } a W y � C • L O 9 O u �+ G � �i �u u a� v N > N C r � w c m N L 9 L L L g a+ v .+ o ' C c N T N Y L = "$ a-' x �a � L y . c nu �. Eu �o )v W 2 E� G N � Y O d > � �J > W L 1v d{ dL c 3 Q s .+ � N r1 L O w � M N � N 8 D L L O t P d C T w - � N r N C W O! U 9 U r q C�l 114 CO!•iMUNITY D�VELOPMEi�T COMMISSION WORKPIAfa 19u3 COMMISSIONERS: Le Roy Oquist, Chairnian Kenneth Yos, Yice Chairman Alfred Gabel Carol Fassett CITY STAFF: Kent Hill 45 0 I �� a �� „ YI �� Y �.1 0 � � �� C � � � � �1 y 4 � O 8y� c a � �` �i � � � � � � �Yy y � {�V e�� d� � Y � �q� � �C �'V°o � �o� ��gy�� 8'��.�" �� Wmg��D cy��`� �� uY 3' �g8 8 �'��.�my$ ��`"2�.� ��.� �,�'=�� :��,�� z�� 4��p��'&'� �dp�m�y �s�{�� .y 9� O�� O h. N L y my r . y +� E C'O l� I�f d V �� Y��+ Y�� E5S �p�� F Y .-1 � � :ii7 �� 6 �� .. � � � � � - � � � � ry � � � � � � � � � � � S S � �'� WS �E.a� �e� �� ti 4 �� O�J ��'� � °r � �� g� w� ■ � ■ � O yY.� � o �� .; � � � �� t, a 5� � � �� 0 � � � � ��aGJ �Ls ■ p� Y :q ��E �pC'�p i C P `u p Y ` � Y �� r � 0 47 0 . : s - . - � _` � � � Y Y � .Pi � y � � 'O v � � � � � �� y `� e H Y �O O � �� W� A O O Y yLLL Y� ■ �s. Y � W � �� ti Y �� y .. c� Y w � �� O � � � p O F O �f � n 9 43 6� � � � � 0 N � �' � � � � Y 9Y i � m a ni • � � � � rl � � V M�:A n V V AI _ � � _ � . • � 1 1 1 ; ._ .. Y Y � � � Vi L� Y Y � � Y �t . �' �, � a .. 8 � � � � � � � � Y �� $ y��' �y s � ■ a. � � �� e� t �'� � ��s � �s� �sg� ��a .;n� ��s�� s �; o �a �� a "g�� ,� �..$� ..;$y �:�8 �� y �� y Y O F �� 50 , • COMMUPlITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION WORKPLAW 1934 COMMISSIONERS: CITY STAFF: Le Roy Oquist, Chairman Mark Burch Kenneth Vos, Vice Chairman Alfred Gabet Louis Schmidt Carol Fassett 51 , s o� 7� �e �� " :$ : � a � I �� ,. e w h 8 s � I � � � � � � a s � � : �p ��w i �P e �` � Y 6 � � � �� Y Oi � ; : = � a Y • O '� tir .1 • ` �Y�i �t �"i ca .= � n �i a I � • Y • i • e�g�s� eS��o 3=:£r�� e�� . zE}:a�" s=io.�is eo .�cs ~ e � � w w �.3�0� �_ � ! M • • . .�i a i o.re Z'� r�. :i- e =a� Ye � � Y O �.� O Y 1V w a Y L � • � ti ■ N GV V � Y C L .�i �!°E° s � Y e � if.l�i E$� �f � � : °a �Ea� e °�. -�� f: z..iae Y'1 ~ N •e ��+=+ H � � o O N� LY.a1 6 � i s Y � �Y . ��a s=1 �L'a L � O �°.a� Af O 1 �` ^ � 52 � � . � � � � � Y G 0 : � w � g� M �` OM M �g � 0 sM L � � e Mr O C v � �� wr O Q ., � . : ... Spw h0� ■ y� O� � � 7 8 � • Y 3� S?. !�' � 3ae a�� a � Oe L a • L 5} t°� 3 • a� s � � � {p � O C : L ■ O � C �Z�a � �w L ti � M S" � L ��Y�i N a � a 53 ' , �� . 8� ��Q �a � M � � �S � [ s. sa� Y V tie � L O O � � � a � s� : �eo t � � � w a � .. � w � � �o �. t� �0 �s V g �a� F �� $w �=w u Y Ma � Y� � •w 3�i �v ;E� � , Y M Mg0 � � � 54 . $ . a • � *s 3 _ N � � a � � � w � � i � S e� 3! 3� Lge . a e �• p M O O � � � 55 �� s� �� a � n 7 � B � � � � _ C � G Y � � � � w � � • Y o . � $$ = ti �� g � � t N O Y Q ` � � r � O � �o a O Ya � � ■ � � � � �� EF �°..: 02 �� N� � O Y w � w O � � Q• � ■O w : � � � Y • .9a�J � � g q � 00 � . ^ � 56 ) ) 1 1 !E!� 10: John Flora. Public Yorks Director 17EMG FROY.: Jim Robinson. Planning Coordinator !g!� DATE: July 37, 1985 RF�ARLINC: Frldley Residential Energy Conservation Project The Fridley Residential Energy Conservatlon Pro�ect (F. R. E. C. P. ? is nou developed to the point �here Council review and approval of key components is needed. I am enclosing material for authorization to prcceed which ir.cludes a resolution, copies of agreetents witt utilities, specSfications for House Doctor contractor and a map yith sched�le for the heighborhood EnerSy ilorksY,ops. Apprwal at tt:e August Sth Council meeting xould enaDle us to proceed in a timely manner. Yitt this reso.ution ve are reGuesting apprwal of the progra�, the bu�Eet, Lhe authorization to sign ag�e�ents with t2�e utllity comparles ar.d to take Lhe re ce�sary steps to eontract vitL a qualified contractor. Nego:iztions have Deen successfully oompleted xitr: nocr, !!innegasco ard NSP. Upor. Council approval of the reso:utior, staff will execute tt.e attact:ed contracts yitr. Minnegasco to fund t6e House Doctor Prograa and witt, NSF for the He:gt:borhood Ener�y Workshops. The House Doctor progra� will provide lar cost veatY.erization imprcvements for approximately TO low ar.d moderate income househo]ds. After Council approval of the enclosed specifications, ve �ill De proceeGir.g yitt the necessary steps to hlre a eontractor to p.rrform the House Doctor prograc. TT�e Nei�Dorhood Energy Workshops vill be held on three Saturdays Lhis Fall and vill be open to all hcaea.�ners regardless of ir.coae. The focus of tte prop�aa is on oost effective er�ergy savir.g weatherization tec�r.iques which individuals can use on Lheir orn hcmes. Ve are planning tbree vorksbops tGis Fall, concer.trating on tY.ree oelg�borhoods in the cer,ter part of the City. Attached Se a map of tt.e Larget areas anC a calendar uf ineetiog dates. Ye et;ose thia area for o�r inStial thrust dua to the poter.tial for good participation. Based or. tY.e strer�th of tbe hiock captain neA+ork and the centra! i.zed location of ¢er.y olden c�t�es xe feel Ener� worksAops vould be successful ir. Lhis are�. JLR/dm t4-85-6 9 APSCl.0YS0i N0. - 7g85 RFSCI,UTIOH TO PAOCEED YII'H it3E PRIDI,EI AFSIIIENTI�1. E�BRGZ COYSf3tYATION PRQ)EC? YBEREAS. the Hinnesota PuDlic Qtilities Commisslon (MPUC) das passed legislatlon �h1ch allws the local puDlic utillties to distribute Conservation Improvement Progra¢ (CIP) monies to participating municipalities (City of F7�iCley) for the support of energy oonservation programs; and HNFAElS. tLe FriGley EnerSy Project Committee ar.d the PlanninE Comaission aupport the FriCley Residential Conservation Pro�ect (F. R. E. C. P. ); and YNF3;ElS. the Fridley Aesidential Energy Conservation Project has a House Doctor componer.t vhich is partially fundeC Dy Minnegasco and a Neighborhood Ener�y IJOrkshop oomponer.t xhich is partially lluideC by NSP; and YHERERS. the funCir� fro¢ t.t:e above mentioned utilities is contir.ge^t upon the execution oP agreeter.ts DeWeer. Lhe City and the utility cosparles; and YHEREAS. Lhe House Doctor component vill require hiring a contractor to perfore �eatt,erizztion for incooe eligible residents. NQi, 1HF7;EFDAE. SE TT RFSQ,VED by the City Council oP the City of Fridl ep, tc authorize the fo:lwing: 1. 9he progra¢ cor,cept ar.d inter.t as prwided for Sn eacG of tGe agreccer.ts DeCreer, the City and the uti;ity co¢parles. ?. Staff to execute those ap�eaer.ts with the utility co¢,x-r1es. 3• Apprrn�al of tl�e budgets for eacr pro6ra� which include utility mcr.ies, Departaent of Ener�y and Econo�:c Developaent grar,t mor,ies and Fridley monies. L. Staff to proxed vitt the necessary steps to contract witt a qualifieC contractor Lo perform House Doctors. PASS£D ANr ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLE`! Tf?IS DA5' OF --- 19 — • YII.LIAN J. NEE - MF:YOR ATTEST: SIIY�iEY C. IHHAt� - CITY Q,ERR, 3/7/2/20 I � _ "� � __ : . vOtw — pon I I � ` � .y: OL�MC1s �AC�L � � 1 �" I� i '.� __ • -� \••�—� • - ! •3t � 1 � _ � _ . � 1 � � F� i -j� �00! r� __' `_ .. � 1 -- ! � � w Q01 _: � � __- ,_.. '' � __ _. _' .'��.. .. _ . _- N.E.W. TARGET AREAS � 1 '�. °• . � i_', - _ `- _ _ _ I �- . ` _l�� ' _ � r _ �/ , I _ � ` ` I 1� � r ' � � _ '- \ _ L, • __' � I '__ '�..r lst Area Sep[. 28, 1985 `�� +_' - __ 1 = 2nd Area Oct. 26, 1985 6'�'� - . _. -' i'- -�f _ ' , ' 3rd Area Nov. 23, 1985 � � -� �� _ ' '.dJ � '� . - �' : -_ . � I N - - � � � �, �`� ' � � -.- - ' � i, I�.` � . ' I'�rl��-' 1-"' -' I r;_ i - j� _ Yi�'= =.►E 'r, I 1 __ �1� ` � .- ��, q� 7 I 1 _- - -Dp � ' _ - ' ' � •-- ,c � - � r. .. O 10 p. 5 'y',T �•'. - '.��(..'F. _ � i _ 1 . - �.�, y'h .'f<'' ._. _ . ' _ '.'�. . t .'y!�; i,t __ � i $ 1�_i � .� f�� "�-� � ra • . - . � ' 2nd area 1st�arei4a�'.-,.;; __ " �:•:;.;i�t�:. j,,r_: .. . - �I' a . � . .5•'ijC.'�'.V: .�. __ ! __ _ - 591 houses �:: 692 houses};. - �o;, �.� �� I� 3rd area = � ` � �` � -- - 470 houses - � _ ' ` , ,, • , , � � I. � " Q11 - �+ - � • 01l1 ; "• O _ _I i /J i I ''.t.. .— -_ I 111. ' ' i l� .e°'� ' - ' I� I� 'a' _�' .-.� 1 : i� � ' - . ,;; .��'- I . � ;� I ' ` i ` � I i,, ,I " � �e01f , .� � - . I � _ i � � - -i. .Y_ I 4' ...� -C l i " '\ I I ` .. . _ , � .__ � _ _ �y ., Iw __ _ ._ ' _ _ i�i .. Y ^ .� I i � . ._ J - -� ��1;' �b22`!C_ � �� _ 1 �� Q /.�_. f i I t' �I �.,' . r� i =�� . L.�� . -�� F043 �.. . '. ' _� ��i ' I _ ' i I� . _ i � � I' ��. 01t � _ - � _ - c..- _ _ ' "'. _..�. I S � �',` -_ — � I = _ _ -- - _ . c �' A''� - = T,�I G- =-_- _ _ -__ i'. g i�, '- - -_. - i s "�i� - '�1�• @=::.e_- _� - - I -___-_ N _ i `_: -- __ __ __ -• __' _ ___ - ' -- --> ' ' ' ' - i f� � G' : IY a• ' _ �� • ` ` - .. � .'.1' � �, ' �� ' I. B � ' - � _ - -. _ = = _'- : E-�: - _°_ _ _ _ _° :_y z_. _,..yi_ s: - - - - - __-�.- --- ° -- `- __ �� ' � - ~ -.. -- - =_ - �. � C'.' � ' � ! � - � - STREET MAP-CIT� OF =__� � `�= FRIDLEY _-_ U - - -_- -_- _- ._'....-�----_._ __-. � .- _ . . _ - � � I�I �� ±�1 ��I!+1i ��I��'!► � 1 �� ,� °°; �� III� �1� ! ��' °v.�m-i��Ti 7-��,i� oo� �� ►��;,� ;; �O` i; -i�� ir ��i 0 � �, it►� �N i�c1+ , O, I � i��l!��I!� Illl��li?ill �,�� II I I � I 1 � I I I w. I �I I nl. a�I� jl �i` !EG I I� �. N'� 1) 1 � ��w �. ��!�l��l °C: � I I �� (i�1 W:� I w� � �11 I �: � 'P�I I ' :� �, �,� ��I �, I,I (�j� ! I9J .�f�11 � Qf �i � 1 �ll. -� I� � � I I �1 ' ` I � ' 1 � � � I � �� ,.i�.i� Exhibit D � � �� .1 �u.Q m:T �:� W. �. �i�L , � � w � ( ? w � ; �� W= � ; ► � � III , � • 7 �� O � „ �� -III, ., II� Iill ti � �� ,�I—_I_�I I ! N !� �"y �� I � � �� ,�, ,. � i i �' I � �III �� ti � i I�i �j�� i�i� ; �ii� N � O� C� � w �+ W L = _ L � O �e � N u a O q C U N Y �n u O� =m � � c� co � �- i = o V S m n 0 c 4 Y � � �+ o �+ s S � a u � � M W Y n O O �o d O L a� a a V L L N p� V � W S = ,,, a c �,�, W 2 = 6r.