The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 08/06/1986 - 6878� � CITY OF FRI�LEY PLANP�ItlG COPIMISSION MEETIfJG, JULY 23, 1986 CALL TO ORDEf'.: Chairperson Billings called the July 23, 1986, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:34 p,m, ROLL CALL: Members Present: Steve Billings, Dean Saba, Donald Betzold, Richard Svanda Meribers Absent: Dave Kondrick, Sue Sherek Otliers Present: Jim Ro6inson, Planning Coordinator Jock Robertson, Cormunity Development Director Wayne Dahl, 177 Nartman Circle Nancy Jorgensen, 5715 Quincy St. N.E, Margery Fehling, 5809 Tennison �r. N.E. Dan Farr, Darrel Farr Development APPROVAL 6F JULY 9, 1986, PLAPiNIP�G COF1PIISSION t4It�UTES: MO'_^ION BY MR. BETZOLD� SECOl7DED BY MR. SABA� TO APPROVE THE JULY 9� 1986� PLA]'lNING COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRPERSON BILLSNGS DECLARED THF, MOTIpN CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. PUI3LIC HEARItJG: CONSIDERATION OF A REZO�JIfJG REQUEST, ZOA #86-04 BY Rezone from C-3 (general shoppin� center) to C-2 (genera1 business) on Parcel 2570, the same being 7699 Viron Road N,E. MOTION BY MR, BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA� TO OPEN SHE Pl1BLZC FfEARIAIG. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRPERSON BZLLINGS DECLARF.D THE PUBLZC HEAR72JG OPEN AT 7:35 P.M. D1r. Robinson stated this property was ]ocated on the southeast corner of Highway 65 and Osborne Road. The present zoning was C-3 (general shopping center), the fiighest comnercial zoniny. 7he request was to rezor�e to C-2 (general business), which had a lesser setback requirement. The petitioner was proposing to construct a new medical clinic buildinq, approximately 6,600 sq, ft. The existing chiropractic clinic on the east side of the property was approx. 1,600 sq, ft. The total lot area was approx. 40,000 sq, ft. before easements granted to the City. In conjunction with the Harris plat, there were some easements granted to the City that were located on the south side of the property. Later in the meeting, there was an informal hearing on the vacation of the existinq Viron Road on the west side of the property. PLAPlNITJ6 COMMISSIQN MEETING JULY 23 1986 PAGE 2 � Mr, Robinson stated that with 6,600 sq. ft. of new medical clinic buildinq, plus 1,600 sq. ft. of the existing chiropractic clinic, the totai building area was 8,200 sq. ft. The lot coverage would be approx. 20% with the vacation of Viron Road, �4r. Robinson stated Staff was recommending the following stipulations: 1. Revise plan to meet C-2 code or ohtain variances for hardsurface and bui7ding setbacks. 2. Provide elevations with building facade material details prior to City Council meeting by 8/11/86. 3. Provide a landscape plan for staff approval prior to building permit. 4. Provide automatic 7awn sprinkling plan for staff approval prior to building permit. 5. Provide a storm drainage plan for staff approval prior to buildin9 perrnit, 6. Provide a site performance bond to cover site improvements prior to building permit. 7. Rezoning is contingent upon vacation of Viron Road, site plan, an�i building facade plan approval. 8. Rezoning is for the approved plan only. 9. Petitioner to provide proof of adequate parkinq for proposed plan, Mr. tdayne Dahl stated he was the property owner and petitioner. He stated some of the problems he has with this piece of property are ones that he felt had been imposed as a result of the City's construction. 41hen he purchased the property five years ago, it was substantially larger than it is now. The property has decreased in size because of the Osborne Rd, widening, the �evelopment of the side lo!, and then the easement for the loopback of Viron Road. He stated he is noai faced with essentially four front yard type setbacks which create a most difficult situation to work with. The present zoning required an 80 ft, setback. If he were to set back 80 ft. from each of the roads, that left about 40 ft. by 40 ft. in the middle on which to put a building which was quite imppssible. It became unbuildable property. Mr. Dahl stated that with regard to the parking, the present plan, if variances were granted, would meet the �resent code for an office building-type situation (one parking stall per 25d sq, ft.J Mr. Bahl stated when the City wanted to put in the loopback for Viron Road, at that time, he had spoken to Mr. John Flora and they had put in writing soMe of the terr�s for adding onto the existing building, However, after talking with the arcViitect, they decided that realistically it was not in their best interest to add onto the existing build9ng, simply because it was a small structure and would not be as aesthetically pleasing. w PLANNING CO�iNISSION F1EETING, JULY 23, 1986 PAGE 3 Mr. Dahl stated that putting up a nice new structure in the front corner elevated higher so all the parking would be behind the buildina was much more aesthetically pleasing. Had the addition been made to the exist�ng building as agreed upon �aith tfie City, it would not have fallen within the codes either. Mr. Billings stated Staff had suggested as one of the stipulations that the petitioner provide proof of adequate parking for the proposed plan (#9). Did the petitioner have any other plan of increasing the parking spaces, other than moving the building north and west? Mr. Dahl stated the architect designed the plan to provide for one stall per 250.�J s4uare feet. �he only way parkina could be increased without a variance would be to shrink the size of the building, Even shrinkinq the building to 1,000 sq, ft. would only save four spaces. But, if they were able to move the building 10 ft., that would add about 10 spaces. Mr. Robinson stated the City recently rezoned the Harris property which was adjacent to this property from C-3 to C-2 for the simple reason that the property was not developing as C-3, This proposal was not consistent with C-3 zoning either, and C-2 was more appropriate. Mr. Betzold stated he would urge �1r. Dahl to look hard at the parking situa- tion before the Appeals Commission meeting when he will be applying for variances and certainly before the City Council meeting. If the par4:ing cannot be increased, then the petitioner should be able to tell them why. Right now the City is experiencing questions as to whether the parkin9 ratios for medical facilities are indeed adequate. MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD� SECONDED BY MR, SABA, TO CIASF, THE PUBLZC HEARII.'G. UPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTING RYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLZNGS DECLARED THE PC7BLIC HERRING CIASED RT 7:56 P.M. � Mr, Betzold stated he thought the rezoning was appropriate, esoecially since the Planning CoMmission recently recommended that the adjacent property be rezoned from C-3 to C-2. This was the best way to use this particular piece of property. MOTION BY MR, BETZOLD� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO RECOMMENP TO CITY COONCIL APpROVAL OF REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #86-04, BY WAYNE DAHL, TO REZOl7E FROM C-3 ( GENERAL SXOPPING CENTERJ TO C-2 (GENERAL BUSIfJESS) OP: pRRCEL 2570� THE SAl�' BEING 7699 VIRON ROAD N.E., WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULFiTZONS: 1. REVZSE PLAA' 7YJ MEET C-2 CODE OR OBTRIN VRRIANCES FOR HARDSURFACE AND BUILDZNG SETBACKS. 2. PROVIDE ELELtAPIONS WITH HUILDING FACADE MAPERIAL IIETAZIS PRIOR TO CITY CODAICIL MEEPZtJG ON RUG. 12� 1986. �-3• PItOi/2DE R I,ANASCRPE pyAP FDR STRFF APpRO�JAL PRIOP. TO BUILDING PERMIT. 4. PROG'ZDE AUTOMATIC LAWN SPRINKLING PLAN FOR STAi'F APPROVAL PRZOR TO BUILDING PERMIT. PLANNIt�G COPiMI55I0N MEETING JULY 23 1986 PAGE 4 5. PROVZDE A STORM DRAINAGE PLAN FOR STAFF APPROVRL PRZOR TO - BUILDZNG PERMIT, . 6. PROVZbE A SITE PERFORMAIJCE BOND TO COVER SITE IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO BUTLDING PERMIT. 7. REZONZNG IS CONTZNGENT UPON VACATION OF VIRON ROAD� SITE PI�AN� AND BUILDZNG FACADE PLAN APPROVAL. 8. REZONIf7G ZS FOR TNE APPROVED PLAN ONLY. 9. PETZTIONER TO PROVIDE PRGi�F OF ADEQUATE PARKING F012 PROPQSF•D PLAN, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE� CHRIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THF, MOTION CARRZED UNRNZMOUSLY, Z, pUaLIC HEARI�IG: AtJ ORDINAfdCE RECOD MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO OPEN THE PDBLIC HF,ARI1dG. UPON A DOSCE YOTE� ALL VOTING AY£� CHAIRPERSON BZLLZNGS DECLARE'D THE PUBLIC FIEARZNG OPEN AT 7:58 P.M. Mr. Robinson stated that on two previous occasions, the Planning Cortmission discussed possible changes to the code regarding day care centers and home family day care. The research for changing the ordinance was primarily as a result of an application for a day care center in a single family neighbor- hood and on a local street. Through thair analysis and in discussions with the planning Commission, Staff came up with the appropriate changes. These changes were also discussed informally with the City Council. At this time, this was a public hearing to officiaTly look at changin9 the code, Mr. Robinson stated Staff did talk to Provider, Nancy Jorgenson, the former Association, and Claudia McPeek, head on Mississippi St. and Monroe St. Rhonda Peterson, a current home care pres9dent of the Anoka County Day Care of the Rainbow Day Care Center located Mr. Robinson reviewed the ordinance in its proposed final form, He stated he had aiso provided each commissioner with a copy of the revised Minnesota Rules which re7ated to the �rovision for home day care. In the past discussions, they had said the code wa�fd be changed to allow up to 12 children in a single family hane. It turned out the provision in the state code allows up to 14 children wfien there are two care providers. Presently, the code allows for 10 children, so they have chanqed the code to be consistent with the State Rules to allow up to 72 chi7dren with one care provider and up to 14 with trto care providers. Ms. Nancy Jorgenson, former president of the Anoka County Day Care Association, stated she thought the City had done an excellent job Tn updating the code, She stated that if she could be of further heip, she would be happy to do so. W � PLANNING COFiMISSION MEETIN6, JULV 23 1986 PAGE 5 M02'ION BY MR. SABA� SECONDED BY 1�7R. BETZOLD� TO CIASE THE PUBLIC XEARING. UPON R VOICE VOTE, RLL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BZLLINGS DECLARED SHB PIIBLIC XEARING CLOSED AT 8:10 P,M, t4r, Betzold stated the revised wording seemed to address the questions the Cormission had befor�, and it did make the ordinance more consistent with vthat was being done at tP�e staie level. .- MOTION BY MR, BETZ6F,.t;, S'!:^O'�F➢EI} $Y MR, SABP., TO RECOMMEND TO CZTY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE REVSSED OR➢SPiAt*�C'�' kECpD.F"FYI:YG THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE� CHApTER 205� AS IT RELATE3? Tp DA]'' CRR.E GE�;TERS ,qND XQME FAMZLY DAY CRRR. UPON A VOICE POTE,,. ALL GFJZING AYE� CHAZRpSRSLtV BZLLZNGS DECLARED TXF MOTIDN CARRIF_B UN�SeV.,T?fLtF,,*,SZ.y�, ___ 3. CQ_NSI�E{tATIOtd DE A VRCATION RE UEST, SAV #86-03, BY DARREL FARR: acate t e ive oot uti ity easement a ong t e sout west praoerty line of Lot 4, Block l, Innsbruck North Too-m houses, P1at 4, to a point ten feet west of the southeast property line of the same lot, the same being 5462 P1eister Road N.E. Mr, Ro6inson stated the vacation request was for a townfiouse lot north of 694 and west of Meister Road. There was presently a 5 ft, drainage and utility easement on the south of Lot 4, The proposal was to piace a townhouse on that lot. The building would encroach slightly into the drainage and uti7ity easement. Mr, Farr had notified the utility companies, and none of the canpanies had any problem with the vacation. Mr. Robinson stated the onZy concern raised by the City Engineering [1e{�art- roent re]ated to the deueio�rnent bnt not specificaTly to this lot. There Fiave been some maintenance problems (cleaning of some debris in the street, some sediment/erosion problems, seeding of an area) on a vacant lot on West Bavariat3 Pass, so the only stipulation the City woe+7d recormend was that the maintenance probler� be resolved prior to the Aug, 18th City Council meeting. Mr. �a.n fa�-r state�t he wae representing the Darrel A. Farr Development Co. He stated they are Tooking for a temporary encroachment onto the easer�ent as it gaes through the City process. The townhouse has been sold, and they have a Sept. 15th occupancy date for the move-in agreement. They have gotten the building permit, and Mr. Darrel Clark said it was all riqht to build so they have started the excavation for the townhouse. Mr, farr stated that regarding the lot on West Bavarian Pass, they have two 4-unit townhouses there, one directly on North innsbruck Drive and the other just off Innsbruck Drive that is being surcharged at this time. They took a lot of dirt and put it on 41est Bavarian Pass because of bad soil. He stated they have had some problems, but he believed those prob�ems were being corrected. He stated tney would like to get the last couple of townhouses bui7t and get out of the development. PLANNIN6 COHF7ISSION MEETING, JULY 23 1986 PAGE 6 � Mr. Robinson stated the temporary encroachment Mr, Farr was referring to v�ould allow him to build and sell the home prior to the ordinance going through �ts process. Tf�e Ciiy Councii has the authority to do that and wili handle that on Aug. 18th. The sediment/erosion prob7em on West Bavarian Pass should be resolved witfi T1ark Burch, Assistant Public Works Director. MOTZON BY MR. SABA� SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA� TO.RECOMMEND TO CITY COIINCIL APPROVAL OF VACRTSON REQUEST� SRV N86-03, BY DRRREL FARR� TO VACATE THE FIVE FOOT U2ILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE SOUTHWEST PROPF,RTY LZNE OF IAT 4� BIACK 1� INNSBRUCK NORTN TOF7NHOUSES PLAT 4� TO A POINT TEN FEET WEST OF THE SOUTHEAST PROPERTY LINE OF TXF, SAME LOT, TXE SAME BEZNG 5462 MEISTER RDAD N,E., WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THE PETITIONER WORK WZTH CITY STRFF TO RESOLVE THE 1dAZNTEtJANCE PROBLEM ON THE VACRNT IAT ON WEST BRVARIAN PASS. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANZMOUSLY, 4, COIaSIDERATTO�� OF A VACATION REQIIEST, SAV #86-04, BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY: acate part o a 0 oot easement or pu ic roa purposes Viron Roa lyin9 north of the north 213 feet, as measured at right angles to, the north line of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter and the north line of the northwest quarter of the northwest lying east of, and adjacent to, T.H. No. 65. Ali lying in Section 12, T-30, R-24. Except the north 33 feet thereof (Os6orne Road) and subject to righis and other easer�ents of record. Mr, Robinson stated this property was located on the southeast corner of Osborne Road and Highway 65, It consisted of a st�*.ip of Viron Road that is no longer necessary once the City has put in the loopback around the property on the corner. The vacated portion was 30 ft. wide and approx. 180 ft. lonq. Mr. Wayne Dah1 did grant the City an easement for a new right-of-way with the aqreement that the Cit� wou7d vacate this portion of the Viron Road right-of-way. Mr.�.Robinson stated the only stipulation Staff would require would be that a utility easement be maintained over the entire strip of the proposed vacated Viron Road as utilities are located in that area. He stated this vacation request was in everyone's best interest. MOTION BY MR. BETZ6LD, SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL GDF VACASION RE'QUES�'� SAV #86-04� BY THE CISY OF FRIDLEY� TO VACATE PRRT OF A 30 FOOT EAS6�dIT Ff3R PUBLSC kOhD PUkPOSES (VIROP7 ROAD) LYZNG NORTX OF THE N'ORTII 2�3 FE�"'i� AS MEASURED RT RIGKT ANGLES TO� THE NORTX LZNE OF THF, NORTHEAST QUARTER pF TFfE NORTNFIEST QUARSER A.VD THE NORTH LIP7E OF THE NORTHG7EST QURRTEP. OF THE NORTHWEST LYING E1iST OF� AND ADJACENT TO T.X. NO. 65, ALL LYZNG IN SECTION 12� T-30� R-24� EXCEPT THE NORTX 33 FEET THEREOF (OSBORNE R�AD� RND SUBJECT SO RIGHTS AND OTHER ERSENlENSS.OF RECORD� WITH THE STIPULA— TION THAT R UTILITY �ASEMENT BE MAZNTAINED OVER TXE VACATED STRIP OF VZRON ROAD. UpON R VOICE VOTE, RLL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, ' � PLANNING COMPIISSION MEETING, JULY 23 1986 PAGF 7 5. DISCUSSION ON SWIMMING POOLS: Mr, Robinson stated tfie last time this was discussed, the Commissioners had asked Staff to check for revised national ordinances. He stated staff had talked to Mike Wokowski, Chief Community Health Sanitarian with the �9�nnesota Department of Health-Swimning Pools Division. Mr, lJokowski's recommendation was to maintain a 6 ft. fence because that is part of the proposed state ordinance for both public and private swir�ning pools. Mr,Robinson stated some cities do things a little differently. Also included in the agenda were the ordinance changes suggested by Mr. Saha and the present Frid]ey Swinming Pool Code. Mr, Saba stated the whole purpose behind his suggestion that the Swimming Pool Code be changed was because he felt the ordinance requiring a 6 ft. fence for soneone who already has a 4 ft. fence around the yard with an above ground pool was ridiculous. A little toddler or sma11 child cannot climb into a 4 ft, above ground pool when there is no ladder or no means of entrance into the pool. First, there is the 4 ft. fence, then the wall of the pool, so he felt there was sufficient restriction or obstruction to a small chil�, Mr, Saba stated not too many other communities have the 6 ft. requirement. He fe7t it was a matter of whether the City wanted to have fences inside fences. He stated the 6 ft. requirement made a lot of sense for below ground pools where small children can easily fall into the pool, but it did not make sense when there was already an existing fence, then a 4 ft. wall to climb over. Mr. Robinson stated the Fridley code was chan9ed in 1975 to conform with the 1970 national code. There has not been any revision to the national code slnce 1970. Mr. Saba stated that, as he had stated at an earlier meetinq, another way to meet the 6 ft, requirement for an above ground pool Yras to install a 2-3 ft. fence that was attached to the top of the wall. This fencing was not very sturdy and added a substantial cost to the installation of the pool, Mr, Robinson stated the basic question was whether the Comission Wd5 comfortable with a 4 ft, fence versus a 6 ft. fence. Mr. Billings stated P1r. Saba had mentioned in past minutes about all the restrictions on swir�ning poo7s, but yet there are creeks and lakes and other natural bodies of water that have no fencing and no restrictions. He stated the Human ReSOUrces Commission was planning on taking a look at the natural bodies of water in the City to see if there was sane kind of need for protec- tion for young children. Children can just as easily drown in Rice Creek as they can in a backyard swirsming poo7. He suggested that maybe the Planning Cormission would ]ike the Human Resources Commission to look at the whole issue of hoth natural bodies of water and manmade badies of water at the same time and come back to the Planning Comnission with a recommendation. PLANNING COM�IISSION MEE7ING JULY 23 1986 PAGE 8 � Mr. Saba stated that was a possibility. He stated the City was just not always consistent with the waythey made ordinances and applied laws, They apply all kinds of restrictions in some areas but not in other areas. There are manmade holding ponds near playground areas that are often more of an attractive nuisance tfian a swimming pool, The large holding pond by the Community Park was a good example. The Commissioners agreed to recomnend to the Human Resources Comnission that, as part of their 7986 workplan, they look at the who?e issue of natural bodies of water and open water as well as swimming pools. P1r. Robinson stated he would pass this information and material on to Bill Hunt and the Human Resources Commission. 6. CONSIDERATION OF M�TION FROH TNE ENVIRONMFNTAL �UALITY COMMISSION MINUTFS OF N MOTZON BY MR. "SVRNDR� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO CONCUR WISH TNF. ENVIRONMENTAL Q'JALZTY COMMISSZON'S JUNE 17�-1986� MOTION TO RECOMMEND THRT THE CITY COUNCIL RUTHORIZE THE PAYMENT OF $117,48 RECEZVED FOR TNE S4/TON REBRTE TO EARL FRANK FOR THOSE MATERZRLS COLLECTED AND RECYCLED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE S.O,R.T. RECYCLING CENTER, UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE, CNAIRPERSOIV BILLINGS DECLARED THF. MOTION CARRZED UNANIMOUSLI'. 7, RECEIyE JULY 14, 1986, PARKS & RECREATIOW COMMISSION MINUTES: �fOTZON BY MR, BETZOLD� SECONDED BY MR, SVANDA� TO RECEIVE THE JULY 24, 1986, PARILS 6 RECREATION COMMZSSION MZNUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� RLL VOTZNG AYE� CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLRRED THE MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, . 8. RECEIVE JULY 15, 1986, ENVIRONt1ENTAL QUALITY C(NiP1IS5I0N MINUTES: MOTZON BY MR, SVANDA� SECONDED BY 11R. SABA, TO RECEIVE THE JULY 25, 1986� ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON R'✓OICE VOTE� ALL VOTIXG AYE� CHAZRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 9. RECEIVE JULY 15. 1986. APPEALS COt1MISSIOPi MIPJUTFS: MOTION BY NtR. BST'LOLD� SECONDEB BY MR. SVANDA� SO RECEIVE THE JULY I5� 1986� APPEAIS COMMISSIOP7 h22NUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� RLL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSOi1 BZLLZNGS DECZARED THE MOTZON CARRZED-UNRNIMOU,SLY. PLANNING C0�4t1ISSI0N MEETING, JULY 23, 1986 PAGE 9 10, OTHER BUSINESS: a, Resignation of LeRoy Oquist Mr. Robinson stated the Corrnnissioners had received a copy of a letter from Mr, Oquist stating he was resigning from the Community �evelopment Commission and Planning Comnission effective immediately. Mr. Robinson stated he had personally admired 14r. Oquist's style and expertise and the City would really miss him. MOTZON BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO ACCEPT MR. OQUIST'S RESIGNATION WSTH REGRET AND TO RECOMMEND TD CITY COUNCIL TNAT MR, OQUIST RECEIVE THE APPROPRZATE CITY RECOGNITION FOR HIS MANY YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTINC AYE� CHAIRPERSON BZLLINGS DECLARED THF, MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, b, Corrmission Vice-Chairpersons Mr. Robinson stated that with the resignation of Mr. Oquist, the Planning Commission was in need of a vice-chairperson. He stated the Commission would have to elect a vice-chairperson. He stated the Comnunity Develop= ment Commission was only left with three members and should the City Counci7 decide to disband the Community Development Commission, the Planning Corrmission might want to consider an appointed vice-chairperson in order to maintain the seven member corrnnission. He stated that at this time, Staff had not had a chance to discuss any of these possibilities, Mr, Betzold suggested that when this subject is discussed again that a member of the Correnunity Development Corranission be present at the meeting to get that commission's feelings. The Comnissioners agreed with Mr, Betzold's suggestion, Mr. Robinson stated he had given the Commissioners a copy of Chapter 6, Commissions from the City code. Chairperson Billings had brought up the question of the appropriateness of the vice-chairperson of the memher corrmissions sitting on the Planning Commission in the absence of the chairperson, Mr, Robinson stated he had reviewed the wordinq in Section 6,p2,1,D ("The comnissions shall each year from their own members choose a chair- person and vice-chairperson. Ai any meeting of the commission, if the regular chairperson is unable to attend, the vice-chairperson shall act as chairperson.") which could be interpe�eted to allow t1�at. The City Attorney had agreed with that interpretatior�, but said if there were stronq feelings on the part of the Planning Cammission, wording could be added Y PLANNIfIG COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 23, 1986 PAGF 10 under 6.03.4.E to specifically state that the vice-chairperson should sit on the Planning Commission when the chairperson could not attend. Mr. Billings stated thai in the past the vice-chairperson has attended planning Commission meetings in place of the chairperson. He stated Section 6.03.4,A. Membership of the Planning Comnission stated: "The P�anning Commission shall consist of the Planning Comnission chairperson, the chairperson of the Comnunity Development Commission, the chairperson of the Parks & Recreation Comnission, the chairperson of the Appeals Commission, the chairperson of the Environmental Quality Commission, the chairperson of the Human Resources Comnission, and the chairperson of the Energy Commission," He stated then they have to go back to Section 6.02 to pick up the fact that the vice-chairperson shall act as the chairperson at all meetings of the cnmmission. His only concern was that it would be easier to add some wording Clarifying the fact that the vice-chairperson was allowed on the Planning Comnission in the absence of the chairperson in order to help avoid tie votes. He felt it was important that when a commission chairperson cannot attend a PTann�ng Commission meeting that the vice-chairperson be notified and asked to attend the Pianning Comnission meeting. Mr, Svanda stated that since the Commission meetings in the past be a good idea to clarify it in The other commissioners agreed, vice-chairperson has attended Planning in place of the chairperson, it miqht the city code. Mr. Robinson stated he would have Staff put together some word9ng and bring that back to the next meeting. University Avenue Corridor Study Mr, Robinson stated the City Council and the HRA authorized Barton-Aschman to complete a corridor study for University Hvenue. The Technical Advisory Commfttee (TAC) for the University Ave. Corridor Study has been canpleted and consists of University Ave. businessmen, representatives from Holly Shopping Center, 17oon Plaza, Hyde Park, Sylvan Hills, MnDOT, Anoka County Highway Dept., John Flora-Fridley Public Works, Jock Robertson-Community Developu�ent Dept., and Jim Robinson-Planning Division, Virginia Schnabel, member of the HRA, was chairing the committee. Mr. Robinson stated that at the first TAC meeting, they discussed the Scope of Work and discussed the project a�ad Aroblem definition. At the second meeting, the consuitants presented the analysis. At the third meeting, the consultant will 6e presenting the midi and maxi concepts. Some of the primary issues are pedestrian considerations, sidewalks at 6us stops, crosswalks, lightine�, and signage, also the fencing issue. PLANNING COMFiISSION MEETIPJ6. JULY 23. 1986 Mr. Robinson stated Staff wanted to make the Planning Cortmis5ion aware of this study and the comnittee.and invite them to attend any or all of the TAC meetings. The next meeting-was scheduled for Wed., Aug. 11, at 8:00 a.m, at Fridley City Hall. He stated they will continue to provide the Planning Commission with the TAC minutes. d, Memo from City Attorney dated Aug. 2, 1979 Mr, Robinson stated that since there were a couple new members on the Planning Canmission, he thought it might be helpful for the Commission members to review the memo from the City Attorney which dealt with specia7 use permits, variances, and zoning changes. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR, BETZOLD� SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO ADJDURN THF. MEE27NG, UPON A VOICE JIOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAZRPERSON BILLIN65 DECLARED THE JULY 23� 1986, PLANNZNG COAfMISSION MF,ETING RDJOURNED AT 9:30 P.M. Resp�ectfully sub itted, . ,�c,e, Lynrt Saba Rec ding Secretary ._^� l� Mt `�` .�.�s� �=ie�ze��li ��._u �J ��>�.,... ��'rn,,. 1`�w.m✓ �� L�NNING CoM�`11,55«ti ��EETt1�6 � ,llL`( z3, 19Bb � , t �'~r �l�l ADDRE G sf�(G c� . 7f'-L�i'�"�- �'c 'c� , cii".�.r' ' . %%� ?-Z � ti �� yw,y.t �� T/t-cQ��,y ��•�L t � � S�� o c�-�-r �F �� : �i-�.QEc7 �'ti. .rs4;� � � �y17 E, %re.�,m; Qc.SS t'n��le;� l�'� `jSy3�� r ��• CiTY O� .. ��•.>�L�Y , 6<31 U6'�t`,,RSIT'f AYE. N.E. �� FRIDLF_Y, :a,� �5452 ca�s�s»-saso 12 SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP +��-10 .�UN 1 7 �p SPECIAL vSE P£RNUT FEE �e?b0 RECEIYP #�%��- 9QifI�[JLID PLAt3NIP1G WMP',ISSIOrT t�'TIIdG A4TE: �i °e�o 9QiELULID CITY QJUNCIL !�E'fING DATE: �I�J� RROPERTY INFORMA �toPex� �w�s e y�/� � ��.+_�r� � •.�;r�. �sa???rmx: �cci �zjc�u.o( I,OT SIAClC 7RACT/ADDITIDN ..a.� • � +• • / i i ti• �a• � �� •• .u. ..._ �� . �...... SECTION OF 71�E �I�: ��.5.,_(',i- I�� 7 - ! ! t 4 # # * 4 R 1� • * * 1 t * * # t t * t tt R i� �t ! ti * t f R # ! * ! • * 4 * t * OWNER INFORMATION �� n�rRFSS � 5�� , ,,.**� � s�� -y��. �/ �� ,��t*�/�,r•••��t*:x�. et.+�.tw *,rx,r�s PETITIONER INFQRMATION rur� �,,...�... �aiE e r+�FSS r.�� -� srcrm.ivxs ! f i t i f!• t! 1* t k*#* i! • 1 1 • 11 i "• T� M Q �� :C � D� STIATLATIDNS: � *,�*..f*�*x*#.:.,�..�*,�,�* � ? 1]1� � 7i 171� `��' � �� PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wednesday, August 6, 1986 ,�n the Council Chamber at 7:30 p.m, for the purpose of: Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP k86-10, by Faith Academy, per Section 205.07.1, C, 2 of the Fridley City Code, to allow a daycare facility on Lots 2, 3 and 6, except the South 200 feet thereof, Meloland Gardens, all located in Section 24, T-36, R-24, Anoka County, Minnesota, and Lot 4, P1eloland Gardens, located in Section 24, T-36, R-24, Anoka County, Minnesata, and tot 5, except for the Westerly 11Q feet of the Southerly 200 feet, Meloland Gardens, located in Section 24, T-30, R-24, Anoka County, Minnesota, and Lot 1, except for the Southerly 210 feet, Meloland Gardens, located in Section 24, T-30, R-24, Anoka County, Minnesota, and Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 92, Anoka County, Minnesota, and Lot 33, Block 3, Ploore Lake Hills, Anoka County, P1innesota, and Lot 1 and Auditor's Subdivision No. 92, tot 17, may be encumbered by a recreational lease running in favor of the City of Fridley, the same being 14Q1 Gardena Avenue N.E. Any and all persons desiring to De heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place, STEVE BILLINGS CHAIRMAN PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: July 21, 1986 July 28, 1986 13 Faith Academy SP #86-10 Harold Swanson 6064 Woody Lane N.E. fridley, MN 55432 Kazimierz Tomczyk 6060 Woody Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 James Reiland 6068 Woody Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Leslie Wilke 6061 Central Avenue N.E. Fri dl ey , MN 55432 David Sallman 6D61 Woody Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Thomas Flolid 6053 Woody Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Stanton 8erg 6025 Gardena Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Henry Olson 6015 Gardena Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Roger Schultz 5991 Gardena Lane SS.E. Fridley, MN 55432 George Bacon 1336 Hillcrest Drive N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Walter Johnson 1334 Hillcrest Drive N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Michael Gannucci 1332 Hillcrest Drive N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Richard Modig 1330 Hillcrest Drive N.E. Fridley, F1N 55432 Planning Council MAILING LIST Joseph Hinytzke 1328 Hillcrest Drive N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Richard Lindquist 1326 Hillcrest Drive N.E. fridley, MN 55432 Howard Bergman 1324 Hillcrest Drive N,E. Fridley, MN 55432 Robert Knudson 1322 Hillcrest Drive N.E. Fridley> MN 55432 David Lucas 1320 Hillcrest Drive N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Arvid Hansen 1318 Hillcrest Drive N,E. Fridley, MN 55432 William Donohue 1316 Hillcrest Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Michael Roith 1314 Hillcrest Drive Fridley, MN 55432 14 7/18l86 Edward Kaspszak 131� Hillcrest Drive N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Bron-Erick Incorporated 3231 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Thomas Duffy 6005 Gardena Circle N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Ralph Skovran 6003 Gardena Circle N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Donald lewis 6001 Gardena Lane N.E. Fridley, P1N 55432 Lonita Kilber 5951 Gardena Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Faith Academy N.E. 1401 Gardena Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Douglas Johnson N.E. 1495 Gardena Avenue "J.E. Fridley, MN 55432 School District 14 Richard french 6000 West Moore Lake Drive N.E.1469 Gardena Avenue N.E. Frid)ey, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Paul Tumms Dorothy Baxter 1310 Hillcrest Drive N.E. 1465 Gardena Avenue fJ.E. Fridley, MN 55432 fridley, MN 55432 Paul Agnew 6069 Woody Lane N.E. fridley, MN 55432 Robert A1}ie 13�3 Hillc�est Urive N.E Fridley, MN 55432 Thomas Manning 1315 Hillcrest Drive N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Charles Croon 1437 Gardena Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Wayne Monson 1423 Gardena Avenue P�.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Dean Johnson 1413 Gardena Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 MAILING LIST Faith Academy SP �86-10 Page 2 Leo Foco 1345 Gardena Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Richard Palmer 1329 Gardena Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Spencer Minear 1291 Gardena Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Herbert Murphy 1337 Gardena Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Eino Efraimson 599D Oakwood Manor N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Charles Dorcas 5960 Oakwood Manor N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Donovan McGuire 5928 Oakwood Manor N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 ,lames Gamble 5926 Oakwood Manor N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Gerald Burrow 5924 Oakwood Manor N,E. Fridley, MN 55432 Stephen Shorma 5916 Oakwood Manor N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Steven Benson 5910 Oakwood Manor N.E. fridley, MN 55432 Stephen Dahlman 1449 6ardena Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Qoicese of St. Paul 1350 Gardena Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 David Sallman 6061 Woody Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Robert Baldauff 6D45 Gardena Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Jeffrey Nagen 5980 Gardena Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Lawrence Larson 6035 Gardena Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Ki Han 1251 Gardena Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Richard Alexander 1281 6ardena Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Bailey Tiller 1535 Gardena Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Kenneth Baker 5925 Oakwood Manor N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Chester Burmis 5963 Qakwood Ma�or N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Janell Benson 5951 Oakwood tlanor N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 15 / �I r.IS, n i ', � '`r � 1cy.i i�� _ N r� +j'' I;l . � . °. _ �i . s. .f :� r n ,-f C ' _ i , '. . H/C� ,. ,. ,� t, . { - `. � / ). �H .4 � �. . � ` f -` ,,,. -6,. CR�T "'pRfYE� � �� ,�' .- .. . _ . . �S� � \P „°�,,; �+� t�' i�� . ° � �v� � ' Z . t ;� " � , �+S 9, ` • � '' �� „r,• �� z �,� `-f .µ � `. : --,--�y - L. L ,,, t � •: . ,1 . ,,,. .. , ` � , ' • -• ., ,- l 'i l�) za�� a � ,.. ;: +w`� ' �� `J ,R• • �y41 � na �a �M1� , v �`".t� � ;r� i , Q , � . � ,o ,,' �0� l�+ �� . ,a � P ` f L �� Vh� ` t7 � � .a � V � � ^ •, Q / � z � �3 i� _ iS ' r a V i � Q. � x nN ,� ` r � �� .� .F ��v� '��. � l � ��\ ( �5�� l�i l 1 �l � / '�` 4� � �a �� / � . . '�% (�{l ' I N� ; . � � NY_I / Y ' i ii � • � .. T ,.. ., - . ;. c��s . , :�, . _ :.. � : . , .,_ , �. : �:� .- � , , � ° r�►1 A� .. xC:: � I `• . � `yt, �� , , ' , r�� <��:? i Cs,� � . L , �� , ' ,, J. � I � ;:;<.�;:; - - - -- � ; ' , _ . ,. _ . 'i ' . . - . . . �F - .. ,.. `::> , . - ,, 2 � s i y:S:x..r..u_ry...p: ' _ _. , -. . ._...v:. 1 N:fl::;s:..:v✓.::5...:. :nA:>.::i( . \ : . ... n :.....: . ..: .. . .. M . .....>...�:�::� .::::........... .::.. � ;..:.: ,... .::,..•:...;... <...:>:>;;. � .:2.:.:: ;..`:;.. .,....'<..:,�. ... . . _ .... :>_:.>:.. ...:;<:<: .:�:.;: n:.. .h.;.::..... . .....::...::...: ..::.v:.�.:.: .t.. . .,.. .x.:::> ... r.>. ..:. ..:»... �...<.�:.. : ...., ...< .. . ::. . .. ... . . . ..... n. .... .. !.:..'::.:.. .. . )..:vy..n ...-.:x� .. .,,. .... ..q:.::j�:'iy.>':Si:2:i:a,>'�:':.' �`)i:i:i{%:�:tC:Y lTl � � . �./ ..iie :':�..X>y.$.p.�r3�i ;</�� . . :. ....� ....^,,r:.:.....;.<.::. .S..eii:.:x:,...::..s..:..s ... ;_:n..:..nR�s..::.i..... a....:v. ... . ...:..i......n n./.��....n........ :):m:..i.:...:....�.:.........v.......n..nv..>�.y..::_t..:iC4...n.�, x..ii['::..U.ii'.;:.�.:i _ ��e ..... .... .........vn.v. ...... ...n.x� %.. . .:. n :.. i'nv::vn..... .. ..). ...�. . ....C<. . n.$). ..S.u..... .. ../..:.irv:.i..):.ii::. : . .......... .... ..... . .................. ..f....... .......,. n: ..,. ..i. ..Ye.... . . . .. ,. ,S . .. . .. .. .......+..,nSY.q'tt.:::. ...Cb::::1:.`i':'j::::� �t .........:::...::.c.:::...: :._ :.... ....v. .. .....). ......, ...:H .: . ::5...,::.:.:o..:,,.5. .......p�.:.> .i _.. ... . ._..>..........,... ... ....:... .:'.:�i :ii:SY�'!i;; �? 1 1i :� S S �S > � � � '� s s z � < � > r � F 1 v,s , � s "� E � �s 3 � bs ' r . �. : �' '� - � .'��r� � ,Sire�+t�xr^� ..,. ,� i � . , �� Y o � �.� .'i dnA�k{ld s d#+Ri�!l �SS 4 �F'b 'Y y.,lw [ ¢ � '��i(�R��. x� .� � :� ��:+�� #��?�. l. �� '' ; <� �.:<::;. :;:, r �i�;�` �a�� „ � = g l8 ��'l� : ! M h : � � - ,,�. �m�. �s� �.� �. > � �d _: <R i ;�l/s, 1 r�:;, ,�y :< < '� _� ' � a, � � �.`J� c . < < T 5 x � � > L y s f� .� > ��s�s � ri a �� ` `�� ' . � �I . . ` ' ,� t' w�!�NUwr.»t �: .(� � i-• � A.> ��IR3�> > £< ' s <� ' !� �^.M�',W'Ak 'L . . )�` iS) � � : ' : x . � . f _ < . .. � a�1 �A�', � /a t7 �rr. � �oo� -.�� ft11 �i1�>A•` :s � �?SC, � 2�J5, z(zs � ; � ... �'. .. .. � . i . r .. �•� �� f ,,, ��, :, ,� i � D �' Z !n (t> • ; n, . :I � . «,,. M � , i �_ <y � I � � �- � l x 5 s , `1, r, .. .�... : f - , � .` .`. �l . -..: . .:..: ::...,: „ .�. 'Z^. ' � ��/ u� .r �"_'""""._" _�__ � -JRIr _ . —3iiTl��iVF "�' 1' r :j. � . � rJ�G) I �•P •, � w/• ♦�e• r {. , j ! I C ( . RACE �, Hi�H :� � � I , a,.a CS) I ' � �i 4 ' � LOCATION MA .� � � Q .. r 4 (/f,oJ S: � C ,y, ` n" ; ia�i� �` ', � :� ; .� �`. 7 '?' ` �,;,:, F. � p � �; � 45 c f � /J u Q ` \ j J ^ � '•^ ' y `1. � S ti i� n e n c •5 J « 5 z 1 `' zo9 �4 �t io f � 1 4 � s' q 'v S v � ., y� Y z R I C CP, E E< ROA Irvv+ ro� Add. � � � ��2 I 5 [ o �r I I, ! , �{: i U t � � ��, y q � t �:�kl'iI � i ♦ 3 Z � ,� .aeu�i�a��s � � E 4 .w , , . � JS � y�. I ;� � ! � 5 � � 't - �� t � 1 � 2 Z� - � R ' ` ' ' � ,� ,5 ; _ _ i � // � e� 1 2 � 11 f. / 3 �p 1�� B g �`'' - � n p AT F 9 , � ��c �,. 1 �, � N/ L4S 7 S e� � i o � 2 " g � e u . � tii{/£ �. � WRK K� 6 1�' T � J 'Q ) n ,3 5 � HIRD �40 J 4' ti o q 9�� B T� ✓� s�' 8 4 3 2 I � z � a I ' .1! — I �. , .� ,.�.. K Mq � � ` � �i � � NI«�R T DAIVE ' � � 5 x � � ' . , , 1 r ' �� - s . � , r� � a - n " 1�6 ^ J N r° \ s e '° , „ H ,: K DRI�E � — � , , >�. �, r, .1 �M � S� •Y �J ? ' [' i � �t1M L�0 / / � HILL�REST _ _� i ! fM�UIiC t•�� '*� /' 31 H '�I �r� � s�d,Ep z m :• d.AKE � Q,�_ p�, 4 � / � �EAC F,'T !sr ?, n „ , d� pp� � � p _ ; z r �� s G � .'• � � � � � � � � , n _' . �/ ' ' "� ;b i Ei. �' Qf/E �j�Y �/ f 1"Q � � �i � �„�' �*° �a • � �fi P ' i - �1 �1 � Q rt = %�, � � � �y..•�r o, e . �� 5, �''' �-;-; ,ti�' ,—( 4 �,� � I ' j � � „ ,� � p i s � i, i k i GA N A t' � 3r � 2 � { ' ' / � If� 29 � ` ,. �� V ` S: lI J1:: /� �s �J�H� ' . 7 / ` � � r � Y � i i J �/ : � �:'i 3 ] ' s - � ; � � � I ,J,z+,� � }' �° f �'� � • ' 6RACE H/GN � 4�" „� -• �, v- ' , s o � � s ,�� ' s ° .� �Y' ., - 3� � i �. . �' .4 �j z s �. . ; 3 � �� R KY �' . ,, _ : ,? � ,�- -- � a � : �' n � . ,, ''' , , -,� -`-� E�; ;. W s _; SCHDOL ADD/T/ON � ' �� p M KF . ,.. , 2 /O Y � � \ :,� '� r __ ` f .. .1`� � I� . %�/J 'l /7 � " i �i�/, �rl. '� !/ , � ('�,,,� ' \ .` e i �t 2 . Q �.,,.r i ^ ��s � g � " �1--, , - - a � T� J • r :,2,��..,��..,9 �...� 1 _. �5�. , �' ��.� T ,'.-P - . " �� . lxO�Gb . � '� "/N / � . . � �: lr �t��q �a;3> 1J t1ir.�/�i�1 /.Z 3 a S�s �%P v • i�R •� � w � s � i S s • • f • �.i ATN Y A�� s ° 2 • � E t: ; w , , . 6R .�. - . • _ .3 � � r�y'.E �� e r ' I. �.�'L � �Zi14 �t ` � i2 3• r � • ••�•i .. �. i . . � , i � � 'I 1. 5 � • ; j • • � "Li'!V'i9A „!°' � 8 °�l�L 5, : �,�' x �� , s , ' 1 F ` �,� � ��t`'E , pN1YE 9 ii i �5 N % i'L i ` �Jt � ^_ h ,� QQf I ► • �. 4 ; �• �y z , ° AlyD�7'70'!V� � , -�, ,� . , , � ;:,, �v - z. � s , e . ' : ,� ,, , .� �ir¢., �.! � � s 1d�Fli� �:� �: . y.`z� i�t6�'fN . ��`� _`!... _ ' . ' i � + ` _. "°. . . . _ �q • " t �. �,..i� � .. #, !� ' { s ' ; . _ + -`� ` , �, � � } � .-T� � ' � � \'�.p � y ..�A . a: 1.. 41� � ' � � � .< , F � � �� . �� n� .,J'� '�� i. � , -+, � ' �,': � y�,':� , �,`f� �r�y � �`�` 4,.. ' AY�` �I .�(� ♦� I� y'�pq ��,. ��♦ �� y1:�" � 7 (�.�+�� '� ' �' Stl"�,1.� .�I��v t� .�w ��, � �eyy�t��." . �'�� u'� � • � �'S �ir $ � , � ' � `Y�.i ^�' S i Y, `. : 4 Y�- .. �JI�`. � �,�� '�� AS )" ��..: �' _. 4L � -� ',� �...14� i � Z�� xy�l��r�'B�' '..` ��+i'�3v�td +' � t . }.fI . y .'Q . �5 I� F . ` �- .. � .n � 1� � .�� 1��. tr[�'r.. °� � y` .�.� IL .� �, , ro yY . � '�s__e � �� / � ,y�,.-+,� t L,a• 6 _ 9 'Ss�•a „ • Kt ,�r. ' .r. �'7�'�. � 1P'� ". 1�� `�1*/�+�e, i }��r � :j ��. �.Cg�t �+.q� '[ ��'r'��Y` �:5 t �� „ � +y 'd�c � J 'y� +: t e � �� •' . a � 4� � .. Yo !'t_" r'�� i i �a�.1 � a -�l.i i� � � �: - Or ' ,1F � A}� � Y� �' ' � i . > .?" � � y�' � . �.. ,. � � . .." . , '^' '� ` `C" � f f• - � i : .. ac� 4` `t`� '' l . �{, * ^ � � y ,�^-' � 4 � > s {�, � .:i tY -' t �..e�C ie_ �:a..'�s}' +if�L•.- � nX L��',�+k. �' .y '�,:y' S.. a h� 4.'�. r A '�� Y' � it� , � )��.� ' - s��#'i :� �SN. �2'. .Q. _� . . � Y.'t.. ii .. ��Ie` y f r_'. �a ..f., ,, •�:I r�•,`3S :.. ,Y c h- } YA'� • � �# _1'r•��t,�c' t ��'� :i.�� s�� . - . �,�. - �r, � . « - . -� > n � Y� r. � ' ♦ #, str. � �K ' . o�, �. t _' � b A j 3.f. �. rt . s._ f �Q.� r _ �'� 5t-�;.o�� _,,�' :� , . � �„---�^y"- �. ¢ Fg I T F-4 �� L/+D t Y�`'i 5 1 T� ''� i �, r r J f � < .. � . .."r •6 � �.,L.'�vV� - .19�}�� r� .:. _ • ` .,:,�.e,, � 1: 4 `14 A ... .. -- � e.._ y � � � �" ��.-...- .. *' , ..x/.l� W �; � � _ a� t , �� : , , i ::'i . � j i �:�'. : :� � -_.i f .. � ..fii`3["� - �� "'' � ! • R ;:' I � 'I , �s. : � ' � �' . � , �` . c �.� .,- . � +F ,: �� j . y . ,� r^ $ �� y� x . 4+ l . Y�' � � � �i•iF� ti 1 � y , ' : . �, � !' ��t ,� �n ��` � "� �� ' r. .:- ^� . � _ �4� �� . . r �H! _ ,•. � y'� � :1Y _ � � �, :a� � . . .�'.,'�:1'Y' . . ,Li �.�....' t� .'i�' '•<r ` . 1��- .. • t �� .'.�/°��i}'�,� ' � . - -, GA(LDEtsA � -, _ _ _ � i%' FEv�niv.0 , k i ,"ty" .e� - -,,,�, `" - -- , � " yr. ,• _ - - - „ � .c�� ,p, ,,,` f t, _. J � � ' \ t.. w - � � t , s� �', 1 •� • � ,ee'-" �' :�.; �( :_ +,��""'�. � � �.. ��,. - - -� i _ � _. """' ,��.tM..�..�� r �� : .�p,�. 3"�4, ' , ' � • � .,_ 1� .:' .� � •d' � , P yr ; ia = ~' � z��:.�,_ .�' , ; � ��.. 1' �, ,� .+ Ir/p , r f-�, � � l �.. .7 � . �" ,�'� i.� . � �-: ` ��ry ��c' " „ 1i� � ' > ` . F "i 9 ��.f " . � 'J:'i . �� `�" , � • .. �. j +. � �'�1 , ' = �+ � , � s � -1 � � "7 l� = , i � � u,� u� � T '�P t -- ".;�� ' : � � . _ �_ ,�. {,� ' „' - , _ �a - .�.a � � � ~t , ' s,. - � �.� �3 1 �-,,.�: y1e ,� _ � �, .. ; � •�"^ .t.� �M� '- �i c � ' • � � • •'jw! ~• � f ��.. �'_ q . 4 ' �� 't, �-� � � .°.. . '� ��n.r-..-� r-'{�� . ;�(' s�� 1 �_� n r` -� �,y �sV . � . ' i '�' . _ �..� * '; 7�_ -. ^� .f 117 1_ t� ' � _ ��. , ; �, � ♦; '� — / `*7 � ' ` `. '� � . -�N � r ti ' � . ,� � . — . y � . � V . � .. �' . ... � ... : � � , a g�,-+ " � iw .'-� � . . ' , �' , . � ( J;r �. �r x` � ! �.� ��9,. � � � . �,�'' / £ r �, ! . . •' % . s �Y� ``� y,A.,, ��r'` I ✓.�3x. ,��'. Jv .4. i`4 y� �x�� ,w,,� .c*- \ r9 3 „-w" '•X t �-e h'#'�'�t . � ' ^ � r � \ 1 '�'��i �l . f t � 4 ��'j � � . , � V I Y� > 4 �{ � x,� y'�L � . I a � �. .- �x' _r -� #tf _ ' . .� t' , - . y�� "*�x � _ - - . '1 .rr� . �... + - . � � . a�. � . \ r ..-� �s:��y- , � . . . . � r � _ w�, ,,� , , . ,e�:.. �- _,Yti;,. %r.s' a./� . ., � . . .. ' � :.- . 19 �F THF v .•......, sT �P � 9� H �p� � }_`.� - vclf o'�.�fs��,�e .n ��°�z � �/NN£5 • DEPARTMENT OF MUMAN SERVICES 6b4 LAFAYETTE ROAD ST.PAUL.MINNESOTA55101 June 11, 1986 Zoning Administrators City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue Fridley, MN 55432 Re: Zoning Notification of Application for Department of Human Services Program License This is to inform you that we have received an application for a program license under Minnesota Rules, Parts 9545.0510-9545.0670, for Faith Academy, located at 1401 Gardena Avenue Northeast, Fridley, to provide day care for 4� children, ages 2z years thru 12 years of age. Issuance of this license is subject to compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, section 245.812, as amended in the 19$4 Legislative Session. If a copy of this statute is required, please contact the Division of Licensing. If we do not hear from you witfiin 30 days of receipt of this letter, we will consider this facility to be in compliance with your local zoning code. Sincerely, � a�M.,ta �C,k��.�..;, Patricia Shomion, Licensor Division of Licensinq 612/296-�252 PS/mm AN EOUALOPPORTUNITYEMPLOVEF `�° � o«s �:aes po-es� 20 LAW OFFICES HOLM & JANKOWSKI 6901 - 78TM AVENUE NORTH BROOKIYN BLVO.AT78TH BROOKLYN PARK, MINNESOTA 55445 WILBVRJ.HOLM TELEPHONE612•561•6222 JEFFREYN.OLSON JOANNE JANKOWSKI DOUGLAS R. WMITNEY June 26, 1986 Mr. Jim Robinson 6431 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 RE: Special Use Permit for Faith Academy Aear Mr. Robinson: Enclosed please find the application for a special use permit for the establishment of a Day Care Center and Latch Key Program at Faith Academy. These new programs will be a small extension of the current operation of the school with the followinq considerations: AUDIENCE The Day Care and Latch Key programs are being established to serve mainly the constituency o£ the school. In the past several years o£ operation Paith Academy has found it necessary to informally accommodate parents who need to drop children off early and/or pick them up late, beyond regularly scheduled school hours. The Latch Key procram will serve chil�r�n enrolled at Faith Academy. Frequently parents must make an additional stop to drop off a preschool child at another location, The Day Proyran is being established primarily for the benefit of the fatrcilies wfivse older children are attending Faith Academy. If sgaca: is available after all school faaulies desiring to participate have been accommodated, other children will be accepted. It is anticipated that these programs will serve approx- imately twenty children each. HOURS OF OPERATION: 6:00 A.M. to 6:30 P.M. 2, Page 2 June 26, 1986 Mr. Jim Robinson r s :'3T3��I7e _ The school has had adequate parking in the past for staff and students. Six spaces along the building will be reserved for parents dropping off and picking up their children for these programs. It is not anticipated that there will be any significant increase in parking requirements. DROP OFF POINT All children participating in the program will be dropped off at the door near the rear northwest corner of the building. Either the Administration of the 5chool or I will be happy to answer any questions you may have regarding these new prograMS. It is our understandinq that this matter will be placed on the agenda for the July 23 Planning Commission Meeting and the AugUSt 4 Council Meeting. Representatives of. the school will be present at both of those times. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, � ~�i � /� 4.� . -%[. ^-'�"�-1�..�G-z�"Cze< o �'JoAnne �3nkowski JJ:jab L11C . / _ From she dcsk d I3ASIl[ QURESHI MEMGkANDUM JR-11 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 18JECT: Julv 25, 1986 5pecial Use Permit Day Care In - Faith Academy on Request: Councilman Schneider �1] Councilman 5chneider received a complaint from a citizen on Hillcrest Drive regarding poor upkeep and maintenance of the property being used by Faith Academy, especially mowing of the lawn. Councilman Schneider wanted to make sure that if a special use permit is given to the Day Care Lhat we impose strict conditions of upkeep and main- tenance of Faith Academy property. Thank you for your assistance. NMQ/la cr. Councilman Schneider Jim Robinson --------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- �M MEMO T0: Nasim Qureshi MEHO FROM: Daryl Morey MEMO DATE: July 28, 1986 On Plonday Morning, July 28, 1986, I inspected the premises and found the grass to be long, seven to eight inches on average. I then contacted Faith Academy and asked them to mow Yfie lawn more often, to keep it from getting this long. They said that they would mow the lawn more often. I have also included maintenance of the lawn as a stipulation in their special use permit. DM{dm M-86-172 ORDINANCE N0. ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE CHAPTER 6 ENTITLED •PLANAING COMMISSION" BY AHENDING SECTION 6.03. The City Council of the City of Fridley hereby ordains as follows: 6.03. PIANNING COMMISSION 4, Membership of Planning Commission. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1986 — ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPAIA - CITY CLERK WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR 23 SECfION VIII PRELIMINARY TAX INQtfr1FNT FINANCIEF]G PLAN FCJR DRAFT TAX INQ2F2'�1T FTNANQNG DIS�tICP NO. 7 (WINFIII.D, INC. ) Subsection 8.1. Stat�nent of Obj ectives. See Section I, Subsection 1.5. of the Psodified Redevelognent Plan. Subsection 8.2. The Modified Redevelonment Plan. See Section I, Subsectioris 1.2. through 1.15. Subsection 8.3. Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financing District No. 7. See Section VIII, E7chibit VIII A for the legal descriptions and Exhibit VISI B for the geogra�ic description of property located in the Tax Increnent FYnancing District No. 7. Suhsection 8.4. Parcels in Acauisition. Properties identified for aa7uisition will be aaiuired either b� the City or the Authority as set forth in Section I, Suk�section 1.8, of the Abdified Redevelopnent Plan hereof. S4tsection 8.5. Estimated Public Improvgnent C sts and Su�portive Data See Subsectians 1.9. and 1.10. of the Modified Redevelopnerrt Plan for estimated costs associated with Redevelopnent Project No. 1. Subsection 8.6. Sources of Revenue. Public improvement costs, ac�uisition, relocation and site pregiration msts and other costs outlined in Subsections 1.9, and 1. 10. of the Pbdified Redevelognent Plan will be financed throu� the issuance of gereral obiigation tax increnent bonds to be re�id by the annual oollection of tax increnents. Suhsection 8.7. Oricainal Assessed Value Pursuant to Section 273.76, Subd, 1, crf the Tax increnern fYnancing Act, the origianl assessed value as of Januaiy 2r 1986 for Tax Increnent FYnancing District No. 7 is estimated to be $ 100,560 based on the assessed value of all taxable real property within Tax Increnerit tYnancing District No. 7. Pursuant to Section 273.76, Subds. 1 and 4, of the Tax Zncrenent Fir�ncing Act, the County Auditor of Anoka County (the "Coimty Auditor") shall certify in each year the amo�t k� which the original assessed value has increased or decreased as a result in a changed in tax- exanpt ptoFerty within Tax Increnent Financing District No. 7, reduction or enlargemerrt of R�ax Increnent Financing District No. 7 or changes in connection with previously issued building permits. In any year in which the current assessed value of Tax incranent Financing District No. 7 declines below the origianl assessed value, no assessed value will be captured and no tax increnent will be F.eyahle to the Authority. Sul:section 8.8. £stimated ca�tured Ass ssed valu Pursuant to Section 273.74, Subd. 1, and Sec�ion 273.76� Subd. Z, � the Tax Increnent FYancing Act, the estimated caFtured assessed value in Tax Increner►t FYancing District No. 7, will approximate $869,900. Zhis estimated annual captured assessed value is detezmined in the following manner: Estimated Assessec3 Value at Canpletion $970,540 Origi�l Assessed value 1986 Payable 1987 100,560 $869,980 SuFasection 8,9, � of Tax Incr�nt Financ'na Dist �rr Tax Increment iYnancing District No. 7 is, pursuant to Section 273.73, Subd. 10(1) (a), a redevelopnent district and as a redevelognent district is subject to the limitations of Sut�ection 8.10. F�1 24 Subsection 8.10. puration of Tax Increment Financina District No 7 Pursuant to Section 273.75, Subd. 1. of the Tax Incr enent Financing Act, the duration of Tax Increnent F7tnncing District No. 7 will be up to twenty-five (25) years fran the �te o� certification thereof. Thus, it is estimated that Tax Increnent Financing District No. 7, including any modif cations f or subsequerit Fhases or other changes, would termirt�te on Diec�nber 31, 2011. SUbsection 8.11. Fstimated Imnact on Other Taxina Jurisdictions. As prwided in �ragraph 8.8 above, the Authority intends to finance via tax increments an amoimt Fresently estimated to be $2,332,445. Unless and until the Tax Increnenk FY mncing District and Plan are duly modified b� the Authority and tk�e City, the Authority will utilize no more tl�an the fallowing amounts of tax increnents for the follaaing purposes: Contract Costs Reserve Inctenents A3ninistration $30,000 $2,332,000 30,000 $2,392,445 'Iherefore, the estimated imFact cff this Tax Incranent Financing District and Plan on all jurisdictions d�es not exceed $2,392,445. Sulzsection 8.12. Fst�mated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness Pursuant to Section 273.74, Subd. 1, of the Tax Increnent FYmncing Act, General Obligation Tax Increnent Bonds may be used as re3uired to anortize the msts identified in Section I, Subsections 1.9. and 1.10. Bond sales will be 6ased on availability of tax inczanent. It is comanplated that all bonds will not be issued at one time but as the,� are reeded. Subsection 8.13. �ax Increment Financina Account for Tax Inc em nt Financing District No, 7 2he tax incranent received with respect to Tax Increnent Fir�ncing District No. 7 will be submitted by the Authority to the CYty and segregated b� the City in a special account or acco�ts (the "Tax II9cranent Acoo�t") on its official books and cemrd or as othecwise established b� resolution of the City to be held 1� a trustee or trustees for the berefit af holders of the Bonds. Subsection 8. 14. Land Disoostion and R d veloner's Requirements All Redevelopezs or Developers will be ra�uired b� wntractt.►�1 agreenent to observe the building re3uirenents and zoning re3uirenents of the City, and such other requirenents as may be estahlished tr,� the City Co�mcil. Land dis�sition �rcels shall be made available under seg3rate cover as they are determined by the Authority. The Authority proposes to cansianate a certain Contract for Private Redevelo�znent (the "{:ontract"), Winfield, Inc., a Minnesota corporation ooncerning the goperty within Tax Increnent Financing District No. 7. Cinder the Cnmract, the Authority will assist the Redeveloper with the wst of soil improvenents to the property within Tax Increment District No. 7 which is lec�lly described in the Contract. Zhe putzlic rost to the Authority is estimated to be $30,000 (the "Contract Project Costs"), and the expected date of completion of the Contract Project is no later than months af ter the execution thereof. 2he redevelognem activities also include the fimding of the IIB Accoimt, a security reserve f�d for the Authority's Common Bond Fund for the ultimate pranotion and encouragement of the goals and objectives of the Redevelopnent Plan. Subsection 8.15. Nbdification As of Septenber 22, 1986, there have F7r�ncing District No. 7. � no modifications to the Tax Increment 2s 26 EXHIBIT VIII A (�EGAL DESCRIPTtON) LOT 4, BLOCK 1, PACO INDUSTRIAL PARK, EXCEPT FOR THE N 35 FEET LOT 5, BLOCK 1, PACO INDUSTRIAL PARK LOT 6, BLOCK 1, PACO INDUSTRIAL PARK I � � . r� ,� � l�� - � � {.1.: � �j� G� � � :_. � _� , -.,,, -: ' r� W J V U W U ; � : r S O U - -� . I S rs � � , e ��` : . i� � � . (GEOGRAPHIC LOCATIONS) —� -- � ?3RD—�—XV . r�E�E-"'� . _ _ __ .�. �OMMER�E . ♦ w r� r' �� s CtRCLE sSQ �:f ii,y �^� . 9�) B,) ' , �� : ---- --�--i-, __ _. ��. _ �_ l.• i frY� �• P <� �� 7 ,�G.11.,.. St.�: /r� ,Y/rr,. �4 � � � �- ., ,i � � 1�� t'1'11r��;�,`ti�,«.ti��{!. 1�1�4+i«I�i�lvlF1'1�1l1�1�t'i�t�l�i ., I�1+1�1�,�'+,��4�1+'�f41�1�; l�;�l�i� I.v�.►�.,I,4,�I,r,11��,�,IrE�>,1,� ' �1!}14`!�� l,I�+N ' ��f+��1�1+1��il�l�l ';1`�i?�i�l� . !i1l11,f1 �I;fN11E,k"' 1i�i��,,�1"rillNils ' i�Nl� IN11N111��. I,I,I,I,IA�+� i�if.��f��.��+j�Q� �'1'1�%VH1111111N : `� ��` �E�� ` �' �M � � ��, �� R �1 i � � f��T.�`,�.��T.�/��,��/� til►i�+:Fii��1�1�1�41p � 1.1.4.1.1.1.•.1.4.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.� - ,/•' u .�eri�' � ��M `� �i � "_ • �,�r-- ;- , � � �� — r 7 � � / i ' _�L _. o• �or • pr � 1 I �M f:� �. TAX INQtII�gN'P FINPNCII� PLAN FOR TAX INQtF2ffiJT F1NPN(�X' DIS'II2IQ' N0. 8 i9iQ2B+l00D� INC.) Sui�ection 9.1. Stat�er�t of Obiectives. See Section I, Subsection 1.5. of the Modified Redevelopnertt Plan. Subsection 9.2. The Modified Redevelounent Plan. See Section I, Subsectiors 1.2. through 1.15. Subsection 9.3. Parcels to be Included in Tax I�}gtement Pinancina District No. 8. See Section IX, E�ibit IX A for the legal description and Exhibit IX B for the geogra�ic descciption of property located in the Tax Increnent Financing District No. S. SuYsection 9.4. Parcels in Ac��isition. Properties identified for aoquisition will be aaquired either b,+ the City ot the Authority as set forth in Section I, Sursection 1.$. of the Modified RedeveloFtnent Plan hereof. Subsection 9.5. Estim�ted Public Imnrove�nt Cnsts anr� Su��ttv�, See Suhsections 1.9. and 1.10. c� the [�dified Redevelognent Plan for estimated costs associated with Redevelopnent Project No. 1. Subsection 9.6. Sources of Revenue. Public improvement costs, ao3uisition, relocation ar� site pceparation wsts and other costs outlined in Su�sections 1.9. and 1. 10. of the Modified Redevelopnent Plan will be financed through the issuance c� general otzlic�tion tax increnent bonds to be reg�id by the annu3l oollection of tax increnents. Subsection 9.7. Oria±nal As�ssed Value Pursuant to Section 273.76, Subd, 1, of the Tax Increne�rt FYrt�ncing Act, the origianl assessed value as of Janiucy 2, 1986 for Tax increment Finaricing District t3o. 8 is estimated to be t�sed on the assessed value oE all taxahle real property within Tax Increnent Fi�ncing District No. 8. Pursuant to Sec:tion 273.76, S�ds. 1 and 4, c� the Tax Increment Financing Act, the County Auditor of Anoka County (the "County Auditor") shall certify in each year the anant by whic#i the original assessed value has incr�sed or decreased as a result in a change in tax-exempt property within Tax Increnent EYnancinq District No. 8, reduction or enLargement of Tax Increnern Fir�ndng District No. 8 or changes in connection with previously issued building permits. in any year in whict� the current asseseed value of Tax Increnent Financing DistriCt No. 8 deciines below the original assessed value, no assessed value will be captured and no tax incranent will be payable to the Authocity. Subsection 9.8. Fc*;mat� ��,,.� r��,a v-��3 p�su�nt to Section 273.74, Subd. 1, and Sectioa� 273.76, Subd. 2, o� the qgx Incrsnert Fiancing Act, the estimated pptured assessed value in Tax Increne.nt FYancing District No. 8, wiil appsoximate $78,824. This estimated annual captured assessed value is determired in the following manner; Estimated Assessed Value at Cangietion $287,700 Origin�l Assessed Value 1986 Payable 1987 20B,924 7 .824 Subsection 9.9. Rtnr of ma T nt Fin�, inq D'�� x Incranent Financing District No. 8 is, pursuant to Section 273.73, Subd. 12(c), an e�ncmic develognent district and as an eoonanic develognent district is subject to the limitations of Subsection 9.10. 9-1 1� 5uk�ection 9.1�. ��rafinn nf TaY 7nrrPmPnt Finwnrinq D�Stt�Ct NO 8 Pursuark to Section 273.75, Subd. 1. of the Tax Increnent Financing Act, the duration of Tax Increnent Financing District No. 8 will be up to eic�t (8) years frcm the chte c� reoeipt 1� the Authority of the first tax increnent, or ten (10) years fran apprwal � the tax incre�ent financirg glan, whiche✓er is less. Zhus, it is estimated that Tax Increnet� Fir�nainq District No. 8, including ariy modifcations for uhsequerrt �hases or other ci�anges, would tecminate on t)ecemUer 31, 1994. Subsection 9.11. F��ted Lnnact on Other Tax�nq Tur�sd�ct�ons As provided in paragraph 8.8 above, the Authocity intends to finance via tax increnents an amoint preserkly estimated to be . Unless and until the Tax Increnent EYnancing District and Plan are duly modified b� the Authority and the City, the Authority will utilize ro more than the following amounts of tax incranertts for the follaring purposes: Contract Costs $70,000 Reserve Increnents _ Ac3ninistration 7herefore, the estimated impact cf this Tax Increnent Financing District and Plan on all jurisdictions doea not ezceed Subsection 9.12. �imar�7 Amo�+� of Boc�ded ?*�tedness. Pursuant to Section 273.74, Subd. 1, o� the Tax Increnenk FYnancing Act, Gerecal Qbligation Tax Incranent Bonds may be �ed as re3uired to anoctize the aosts identif ied in Section I, Subsections 1.9. and 1.10. Bond sales will be based on av ailability of tax incretner�t. It is aontenplated that all bonds will not be issued at one time but as they are needed. SUb62Ct10II 9.13. ma Tnr � cinanri»a A rnnn* £OL TdX Increment Financina District No 8 The tax increment received with respect to Tax Increnent FYmncing District No. 7 will be submitted by the Authority to the CYty and segregated by the City in a special account or accounts (the "Tax INCranent Acm�t") on its official books and record or as otherwise established kX resolution of the City to be held b� a trustee ar trustees for the benefit of halders of the Bonds. Subsection 9. 14. *^� n'sms*� n and Redevelogr's Reauirements All Redevelopers or Faevelopers will be required b� corrtractual agreement to observe the twilding requirenents a.nd zoning requirenents of the City, and such other re3uiraner�ts as may be estaW.ished by ti�e City Co�cil. La� disposition Farcels shall be made available under sep�rate cover as they are determined b� the Authori ty. The Rutherfty proposes to consianate a certain Contract for Private l��v �.apnet� tthe "Conttact") with the 5horewood, Ine. ooncerning the propeLty within Tax Increnent Financing District 230. 8. Subsection 9.15. ��f+� *'^^ ^f 'i'aY r„rrmwnt Financzna District No 8 As of September 22, 1986, there have been ra modifications to the Tax Incr �nent Financing District No. 8. 9-2 2p � EXH{BIT fX A (LEGAL DESCRIPTIOW) That part of Lots 16 and 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88 included in that part of the southwest quarter of Section 13, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota described as follows: beginning at the intersection of the southeasterly right-of-way line of State Highway 65 and the south line of said southwest quarter of Section 13 thence east along the south line of said southwest quarter for a distance of 232.00 feet to a point, said point being 1294.80 feet more or less west of south quarter corner of said Section 13 thence north at right angles to the last described line for a distance of 285.54 feet thence northwesterly with a deflection angle to the left of 78 degrees, 54 minutes, 09 seconds for a distance of 163.61 feet more or less to the said southeasterly right-of-way line thence southwesterly along said southeasterly right-of-way to the point of beginning, subject £o any and all easements of record. 30 r � ��..�--r1 _ . -� , , i �, � C, i!= `i^ `.j... ___ . l � . /� H _ W � O O J a � � O W �7 -, g� N� � � � ----____ �r ' , �.`y . '� .r'w�:. .. _ o _ •, � / \� ti �o � � Q' '�• � o. ; T�"---.�.� ��,� �,�.,. � � ��, o� r ,` ` �� i y w . .. . �� OiJ � �O �". a,�i �^ ' � .� n, :. I - �� q � :P� �� N ,. �� I�, F 1 ` •1 .. 0 �' / ��1 U /' � �`j'�) \ • 1 N , �S} ^ � �� \' � �� _ - . : • ..�, ��• � ` Q i • „n h' � . .. . . ` . `. i �_ �. ... � .�, , � -. ; ; � � N Y ;, _....., �. . � �; , ��a � y � i �m e� m � I Q ,I, Y.� --- 4� ��a�� _ v F � , ` � � � V � ^. �' `� _ i Q � �,� N i � � 4� _ . I Q � '� ^ � , � �, � .� o � ' .;' r.,,� '� p____�• - ,/i 1 � ! r �'� L_ _ yw' �. I --`�+--"�' �,� I +' �LiBV� � J {Z!d?L/'. r�-�� _ : I . O.:IJ/.-! SB�y9/7 �_/`"--.. - �---�---� �� -. ..... � ' U9az: � � �'0• �.,___-� _. 't;�fo,'1 77U.OZ: y ��'_��°,.. —��..�� lt�FJ//d —'��.a,_ T � � ,�ti ,; -� . x �. ti;, ,. ' r� (� � �� 4 1]'^� �, h �y--° J�d��PJ��:::_ M �N c L \ �J , �� ,1 � � , , f.^ s 1 1 � ^ R � �y i � I H � � � ry �h �'-� � i I _� � I � W SQ�d7HJIH � �I �' ('� � �I l 0 J � � � �' a ° �>� � 1 0 . . O � , I '.._ I W'� Y � M/ K�`� /// � i �I i i. . 8, Action of the Council. 1he Cour:cil shall at lts reat regular meeting after receivin6 e recoccendation of the Appeal� Comai�alon vith a policy revie y tbe fl annicg Cor.cission, deeide on Lhe action Lo De takea. q, LaFse of Yariance by Non-ux. If �ork as percitted Dy a variance is not enced xithin one yflar and coayleted withi❑ two years after .tSng of a variance, then avch variance shall Decome null d void unless a petition for extension of time Sn vhic3i Lo plete the work has been granted Dy tY,e cocaission. Such exte on ahall De requested in vriting and f11ed xiti, the City M ger at least tventy �203 days before the expiration of the rlEinal variance. The request Por extensian shall state s sha+ing a good faith atteept to cocFlete tte xork percitte n tke variance. SucA petition shsll De presented to the /,�pe _ Coccission for hearir.6 and deeision in the same manner as .e ori�jnal request for variance. 5.08. COl�;ONISY DiYELOPlENT COl4lISSI09 7. Purjiose. TT,e Cer.cur,ity DeveloF¢er.t Cooaissior, Ss estaDlished Lo Crocote and cair.tzir, hi�: qu�llty cocaur.ity star.CarC� to ensure a well balanced ar.d orderly develoycent, retabilitation and redevelopaer.t of the C.ty o.` Fridley, ineludinb, but not li¢ited to eeonocic developcent, Industri>1 anC eoccercia� develoF�ent, housin6, transDortatlon ser�'ices, yublic utilitles, coccunity develo�ent projects arC oV.er related developcent activities. 2. Scope. p., The Coc�ur.ity Develoycer.t Co¢oission st,all act as an advisor} cocmisslon to tt.e Plar.nin5 Coecission for contiruous comcunity plar.aing and development oP Lhe coeprehensive City goals ard policies. My� �hanEe ir. related cocmunity plannir.E ard cocprehensive City goals ar.0 policies must De reviewed Dy the Plar.ning Cor.¢issior. who will ther. sake recoeeendations to tl:e City Council. B, 7he Cocimunity Development Co�cission shall advise the City Louneil, atter a poliey review by the Plapnin� Coccis�ior,, in the developcent cF proEracs to give increased effectiveness and directio^ ir. isFle�enting estaLlished City goals ar.d policies, and recocmer.d actions as needed relevant to the physical developcer,t of tr�e City. 6.09. E�iEAGY COt�4SISSTOU 1 . Ptu'Pose • 1t�e E�rp� Coccission is estaDlished to s' � ir�terest ir and to prosote ar. av�rer.ess of ene nceros aeong citizens apd businesses of ti:e C' ridley; to serve as a resource Lo tGe Cit}• ir. servation and aanagecent ot. energp and energy ces, ar.0 Lo advise tLe City Couec:l, the C:ty N>nzger ar.d r. COt�lU�ITY D�.Y ELOP!£NT COMHISSION COH1'.ISS ION 6-E 32 .�,✓ COPT'1JhdIlY IIEVELOPNEDiT COfT'IISSIOPa �O�I SSI ONERS: Le Roy Oquist - Chairman Kenneth Vos - Vice Chairman Alfred Gabel Louis Schmidt �• �• , •�, �ITY STAFF; Mark Burch � s oa �� V N � � � � �O M M � � � � M ..l � � r � � N C Y O � e • � 0 Fp i �q1 m i P O Q O i � e4 S 0 � ► 8 ., d 2z $ !.� _��__�__�_��__�__� O U O � 08 0° � ag �� --------------------- � � �F S ��`��.�_��.��.� Y O �+ 1� O • • �µ C • J • 7 C G G C � F� • ,C� Y � O S� O e o � •..v • .w ✓ a L A � ,.. .� n a �. • M Y Y a L u,OC L H � C N 4 M i O� i� t me� oo dita �g? �a ��a� — �---------------------- � . :� • �oa � �.,e�� to� � o e g c: c�". � g a Z �� ao e= .�. �a.o � c� .01 T M O O V � O C O V■ • O D� M' O �y L O O H O C v o a� a. e� o e � S :� :�3� °d�, _3 .:o �o.°� eo'o �ua � � a•°+e o c o a e � m o�� o ~ v n a°c o��a' e o'� Q.",+ i �.°■� pQ.Q�.~i o$ Nwa �y� MQ C �-�Ow O O NY 4��1 �0 S ��.��'�� i 0 � e �$ e o e • ..'�°a i Y N O A O ON.� N � L `' 8 °' a tl �t� J M a C � Y • C ♦ F ✓ � � M T 34 o� �s U H �M � p 6 N � � 'M V � M O � � Y �Mp i H H C^ � � M d N � W O r .. y � T C O w r e � eg R � > S Y � � NM U � �yp O � S � Y O � O O L � •• L O L G • O O L M � • b C u � O � �p N .�1 G . O � .. e r .°. Y ` o o.g Q 00 O C L C O ■ �1 �1 CO� ; 6 A t � w f�+0 M 6 C L o • o oonu • �.oro 1�-� .Ci y i � ��___�_�� • y e e�p o v ww e e � L P� u i 3� S� 0 .o . o a. .' � i o r°. ��o a M � 35 �e �� B � � I 7 t �. 8! Y a �LY e o _ = i � � e� : �Y� n � �� w � � � � � w � � le � Y y� { ° 3�� t��M � � Y 0 F � � � � Y �=u w Y a c�'i i� � • .� i� _�� , Y � �a� w,t � � S6 37 f Om • 6 � G 4p i P C O �1 O � Y C a 0 .. : a � Y � �� = D n� H �o M � � � � �yy 1-{ � 0 M G � � � s �o � m y O 8 -----� t � .� a .Y , ' . 4 � ? C O u A S� g .. e .� i � . � o i � e � o � w ogi' $`i� �o� �o,� :e$ o•:°� 6 C Ot0 � O� ti o-� �+xa ��S Nea: � : 8 0 .. F • Y J � 0 O S O � a e � Y Op C O L � ■ L H.�id • �0 � O C C i � � Y � � � � a. s. a� �� rl N � ! � MI Irl � � 1 �� , a � r � � � � � � Q■ S � w � � � : Y � s s w • � Y �� w� �2 � g e � p J ^, L O ` � F ti�/ � G .�i °ey � O yY ■ �s ao M : ga ��2 � �� o� 5 e o � �w r$ �Z w �g � N O � a _ O y i �Y O N � � � , ., . G .� 39 CITY OF FRIDLEY COMMUtiITY DEVELOPMEtiT COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMHER 10, ]985 -LALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Oquist called the September 10, 1985, Community Development Comnission meeti�g to order at 7:34 p.m. R�tL CALL; Members Dresent Members Absent: Others Present: LeRoy Oquist, Al Gabel, Gene Rezac, Ken Vos Louis Schmidt Mark Burch, Asst. Public Works Director AP�P,DVAL Of JU.':E 11, 1985, COMN,UNITV DEYELOPMEt;T GOMMISSIO�+ NI';U7E5: M�TI�'� by Dr. Vos, seconded by Mr. Rezac, to approve the �une 11, 1985, Community Development Lortmission minutes as written, UPO'� A VO10E VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERS��i OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTIOt� CAP,R]ED U1AKIMOUSLY. 1. DISCUSSIO� OF 7NE CITY OF FRIDLEV'S COr4r?;SSI01� STRUCTURE Mr. Oquist indicated that he had talked to the City Council about the direct;on of the Community Development Comm;ssion. The Council felt that the comriss�on could not work with the HRA. Qiscuss�on w;th the Council included having the comnission review the structure of the comrcissions which could invotve some reorganization, exploring the neighborhood concept which could include ident:fying and promot;ng neighborhoods, looking at the concept of accessory a�artments to See if City ordinance Should in[lude a�cessory apartmerts, review the comprehensive plan and ask for input from the other commissions, and Fir. Oquist said he had received informaL�on regarding e golf rourse to be located near the nature center in Friaiey. hr. 6yrc^ stateG that restructu r'og the comr:�,ssions would require loo��ng ot the different work pians to see if there are parallel goals, see where the needs are and then decide the commissions necessary for those needs. Mr. Oqu�st provided Dackground inforsnation on the current comm'ssions, hoa: members are appainted, and what he perceived their funtYion to be. Mr. Rezac felt the restructuring may be necessary because the needs of tne City may be different now than when the cor,r�issions were established. Because of more development in the City, the need for a Comnunity Devetopment Lommission may be less. LR�� LaM'tU.'�ITY DEVE�OPMENT COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 10 1985 PAGE 2 Mr. Burch indicated that the City Council wants input from the commissions. Mr. Burch contacted other municipalities to see what their comnission structure was, but stated he did not get the response he had hoped. Each municipality is different. In Fridley, the City Council has the power to 5et up the structure as they woutd like anE can a15o create tortmiss�ons to investigate a particular subject. - Mr. Rezac suggested creating a body to meet on demand which could eliminate comnissions looking for direction. Dr, Vos indicated that ad hoc comn;ttees could serve a similar purpose. Mr, Oquist explained the process of organizing a commission and indicated that it can be a lengthy process and can be diffitult to get a group back together once disbanded. Mr. Rezac noted that, in the infortnation included tin the agenda, most of the developed communities did not have a community development committee. Mr. Oquist stated that some commun;ties have community development departments as part of their city Staff. Mr. Burch indicated thai in Fridley this function would be part of the planning department, and they are part of Public Works. pr. Vos indicated that even though there are not a large number of commissions to review it would be necessary to look at the entire system in order to make a recomnendation back to the City Council. Mr. Burch noted that he felt the restructuring was a Planning Comrission function; however, Mr. pquist indicated that the commission had been requested to rev;ew the structure by the City Louncil. Commission members indicated an interest in pursuing further the restructuring but would like to have additionai information before proceeding. 14r. 6quist stated that at this time he felt the Comnunity Development Coimission would look at Lhe comcission structure starting right beiow the City Council level and that this De discussed further a2 the t�ovember meeting. He requested that Jim Robinson be asked to attend that meeting to provide add;tional informaLion and ezplain the system as it now is set up. Mr. OquisL also naLed the Qistussion regarding estahlishing neighborhoods in Fridley. 7he conteQt sia�ted several years ago to identify neighborhoods in the city similar �p tF�se in Minneoyolis. 7he neighGorhoods in Ifinneapolis were estab7ished as a resuit of a concnDn bond such as ethnic group which would be hard ta ident�fy in FridTey. Mr. Rezac felt that this may be difficult to do because residents may chose not to participate. Dr. Vos felt that neighborhoods would be a personal choice rather thar� a function of government. Mr. Oquist felt that this could reouire additional staff time and would need � dedicated people in the comnunity in order to succeed. 41 COM".Ur,ITY DEVELOPM'cNT COMM�ISSI4N MEETIN6, SEGTEMBER 10, 1985 PAGE 3 Mr, ourch 6rought up the idea of a comnittee to find events for the community as a whole and/or promote community spirit, Mr. Oquist felt that community spirit could be promoted through functions such as 44er Days, dedications, art shows, etc. These functions could also involve the Chamber of Comnerce. It could also be possible to have a subcommission to look at the concept of neighborhoods and promotion and - make a recortmendation to the Comnunity Development Comnission. Mr. 6abe1 suggested inviting the Dlock captains to a future meeting to get their ideas. The commission will discuss the neighborhood concept again at a future meeting. Mr. Oquist indicated that the comprehensive plan could also be reviewed, Some areas of the plan may need updating. Mr, Burch was asked to provide a copy of the comprehensive plan to corrmissi�n members who did not have a COpy. Mr. Oquist indicated that he had received some information about the oolf course, and there seems to be quite a bit of interest in this project. Mr. Steve Nelson is on a coRUnittee to oDtain signatures to bring the subject to a vote. The petition has 167D signatures, a refe rendum requires 2500. Mr. Rezac exoressed an interest in pursuing the issue of a 9olf course. He felt that the commission could look at the site, hear the pros and cons, gather the necessary data, and make a recommendation based on what is best for the City. Mr, Burch explained the area being discussed for the golf course noti�g that the land is adjacent to the nature center. He indicated that the golf course and nature center appear to be compatible and that there is land available around the nature center. He also noted that a trucking company had requested a permit to build on a tract of the available land and he did not know if there would be enough land available for a golf course. Mr. Oquist distributed info+mation on the golf course issue. Commission members expressed an interest in pursuing the subject further, Mr. Rezac noted that more informaiion would be necessary such as the number of acres availabie, type of land to see if ii is suited for a course, a report oR the n�Lure center includ;ng budgei snformation, and talking with a golf course desegner. Mr. Oquist noted that the nature center is busy and that about 100,000 people visit there each year. 7he center spends approximately 5115,000 of taxpayers money. Mr. OquiSt indicated that he would like more information and feedback. He suggested asking Dudne Prairie, of Park Construction Co., and Mr. Steve �+elson to attend the next meeting. Mr. Burch was asked to provide a�aps shov�ing the area and indicating the Yotal number of acres, acres being used by the nature ce�ter, and report back on the status af the permit for the truc�ing company. 42 COMMUr;ITV DEVEIOPMENT COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 10� 1985 PAGE 4 Mr. Oquist also requested Mr. Burch to talk with City staff to see what they thought about pursuing this issue. MJTION 4y Mr. Rezac, seconded by Dr. Vos, to further explore the issue of ihe golf Course, that the next meeting �f the commission be an information gathering session, and that Steve Nelson and Sob Arnette be asked to attend. = UPOtI A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UtJANIM0U5LY. Mr. Oquist indicated that the commission could also look at the concept of accessory apartments. Accessory apartments are currently not allowed according to city ordinante and it may be time to recormiend a change. Mr, Burch was asked to copy materials from the State of Minnesota an� have them available to distribute to commission members at a future meeting. This topic was tabled for discussion at th:s time. AAJOURNMENT: MOTI01; by Mr. Rezac, seconded by Mr, Gabel, to adjourn the meeting. UPO'a A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPEP,SO�� OQUiST DECLARED TNE SEP7EMSER 10, 1985� COMNU':ITY REVELOPMENT COMNI55ION k,�ETlir'G ADJDURNECI A7 9:10 P.k. Respectfully submitted, , ,� '�2: �� Y.,� /-c./ 'Lavonn Cooper � 1¢�- Recording 5ecretary L 43 CI7Y Of fRI6lEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COtfitIS5I0N MEETING OCTOBER 8. 1985 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Oquist called the October 8. 1985, Comnunity 6evelopment Lorrmission meeting to order at 7:A2 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: LeRoy Oquist, A1 Gabel. Gene Rezat, Ken Vos Others Present; Robert Barnette, C�ty Cou�cil. lst Ward Mark Burch, Asst. Public Works Oirector APPROVAL Of SEPTEMBER 10, 1985, COD4IUNITY DEYELOPMEt�T COMS�ISSION MINUTES: NOTION by Mr. Gabel� seconded by Dr. Vos, to approve the September 10, 1985, Cort�unity Development Commission minutes as written. Mr. Burch noted that Louis Schmidt had 5ubmitted his resi9nation from the coRani ssi on. Mr. Burch also noted that the agenda contained information regarding accessory apartments. UPON A VOICE YOTE, ALL VO'TING AYE. LHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 1. DISCUSSION Of THE GOLF COURSE-SPRINGBRODY, NATURE CENTER Chairperson Oquist indicated that �4r. Barnette had brought the subject of a golf course adjacent to the nature center to the Lity Coun�il. At that time, Mayor Nee asked the commission to take a look at the issue and see if this wou7d be feasible. Mr. Barneite provided the commission members with some background information on the nature center and past efforts to bring a golf course to fridley. At this t:�, a qolf course is being proposed on the land adjacent to the nature center. Mr. Earnette fee]s that a golf course would be 9oad for the cortmunity and could enhance the nature center. t!e also indicated that if nothin9 further fiappens the carr�ittee obtaining signatures on a petition would continue with their efforts and the issue would come to a vote. Mr. Barnette estimated cvns2ruciion costs to be 51,200,000. Members were given copies of statistital information from numerous municipal golf courses in the area noting that 15 of the 17 have made money. ln addit�on to revenues earned from golf, the area could also be used in winter for cross country skiing making the co�rse and naLure eenter usable year-round. Chairperson Oquist questioned whether the area was saturated with golf courses. _�n LOkNUNITY DEVELOPM:NT COhA1I5S10q MEETING OLTOBER 8, 1985 PAGE 2 Mr. Barnette stated that in a study this area was found to be most lackin9. He recorm�ended a re9ulation 18-hole course and added that a good course could . De constructed on a minimum of 300 acres depending on the layout, Mr. Sarnette n�ted that the trees. ponds. drainage ditches are all assets to a golf course and can be used constructively in the desi9n of a course. He _ also stated that some land is available west of the railroad tracks in Coon - Rapids. Dr. Vos asked which areas of the nature center were most used, Mr. Bar�ette noted that the central and westerly areas of the center have the most use. It may be possible to use the eastern edge of the nature center as part of a golf course and not interfere with ti�e nature center or its programs. Mr. Burch inditated that he had talked to Siafi St. Clair, Naturalist, Springbrook Nature Center. Mr. St. Clair had stated that a golf course around the nature center would be good and would provide an additional buffer for the center. pr. Vos asked how much of the nature center could be used for a golf course and still keep both parties satisfied. Mr. Barnette indicated that this would need to be compromised, should it be necessary. Chairperson Oquist noted ttat the NRA would also need to get involved for land acquisition. Mr. Burch indicated that tie HR.4 has the power to create a district and can declare an area as a rede elopment zone if the area is blighted. Mr. Barnette noted that :he soil in this area is generally substandard and generally not suited to '�uilding. It would be suited for a golf course because a course does not requi�a stable soil. Chairperson Oquist ask .f about the status of the proposed trucking company. Mr. Barnette indicated that the request from the trucking company had been approved by the ;,iiy Council and will now go to a public hearing. The cortpany woutd use a��roximately 30 acres of the land being looked at but Mr. Barnette did naL think ihis would create a problem, The company would also provide revenurs to the Lity. N.r, 8arnette added that any profits made from a go?f course would go inYo the general fund to offset the costs of other pr�jects. Mr. Burcfi indicated that the area is part of a watershed district and it is possibie to get funds from the district for developmeni of water control. The commission members reviewed an aeriaS map showing atr2ages, land available, location of nature center and existing businesses. 45 COMNUi�1TY DEVELOPMENT COMItI55I0PJ MEETING, 4CTOBER 8, 1985 PAGE 3 Mr. Oquist requested to know the availability of the land west of the rail- road tracks in Coon Rapids. He also requested that Mr. St. Clair attend a meeting to discuss the concept. and that he would like to see if a course could be developed with a minimal effect on the nature center. Mr. Barnette indicated that he would contact a designer to see if he wculd 6e willis�g to look at the maps and the site and give their opinion as to _ whether they felt a golf course feasible. Mr. Rezac indicated that the Chomonix Golf Course in Circle Pines has been p�ofitable as a 9-hole course. The critical part is the bonding that could drain cash flow. Acquisition of land could be a problem. He added that an advantage to this area is the quantity of raw land. Mr. Gabel requested more information on land acquisition and the costs involved. Mr. Barnette indicated that he did not know what land acquisition cost would be. The land is held by a number of different owners. He noted that Mr. lnman had done some studies which show that a golf tourse would work over a 20-year period. Mr. Burch indicated that he felt staff could fairly accurately determine the acquisition costs and development costs for the commission. Dr. Vos asked what possible employment this would bring to the community. Mr. Barnette estimated employment of 5 or 6 full-time employees and 50-60 seasonal employees. This number could change if the area were open year round. Mr. Oquist requested to hear from Mr. St. Llair to see what his thoughts are on the proposal, find out the opinion of a designer to see if there is sufficient land to construct a good golf course and provide water control, and see if the project is financially feasible. When the facts are obtained, they should be presented to the City Council along with Mr. St. Clair's presentation, and then have the City Council indicate whether they wish to continue. M07ION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Mr. Rezac, to contin�e the discussion of the feasibility of a golf course in the City of Fridley. UPON A VOICE UDTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERS01� OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTIO�� CARRIEQ U':A.9'Ik�USLY. MOTION by Dr. Yos, seconded by Mr. Gabel. thaL staff study the feasibility of a golf course through a rough layout, receive input from Mr. St. Clair as to what would be a reasonable amount of land to use from the nature center if necessary, have staff provide an estimate of land costs and the area of vacant land, obtain copies of the study by Sidney Inman on profitability, and obtain an estimate frnm a designer ef cnr.siruction based on a cost per acre; and thai this ir�fornatio� be provided to the commission members for discussion at the next rrt2eting. UPON A 40ILE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSO�a OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTIOP� CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 46 LOhP1U'�ITY DEVELOPMENT COMh1ISSI0N MEETING, OCTOBER 8, 1985 PAGE 4 OTHER BUSINESS Chairperson Oquist indicated that the subject of reorgani2ation of the comnission structure had been discussed at the Planning Cortmission meeting. 7he problem involved with the Comnunity Development Commission performing this task is that the members are not familiar enough with the structure tc make recortmiendations. The Planning Comnission suggested developing a plan to be used for the restructuring. This item was tabled until the next meeting. ADJOURI�MENT MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Mr. Gabel. to adjourn the meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIN6 AYE, CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE OCTOBER 8, 1985, COMFIUNITY DEVELOPMENT MEETING A0.)OURNED AT 9:D8 P.M. Respectfully submitted, ,, -�. � 1 U, .� l'J`! i i�J avonn Cooper—��— Recordi ng Secretary 47 CIT1' OF FRIDLEY COM`lI;�ITi' DEl£LOPMEI�I GOYYISSI01� MEETI�G JA1:l;ARS' 14, 1986 CALL TO ORDER: - Chairperson Oquist called the Januarp 14, 1986, Community Developmeni Commission meetin� to ordcr at 7:35 p.m. ROLL CALL: Mem�ers Present: LeRo}• Oquist, A1 Gabel, Ken \'os Others Present: Mark Burch. Asst. Public l�orks Director APPRO\:1L OF OCTOEER B. 198;. COM5IC�IT1' DE�'ELOI'MEST CO!!`:ISSIO� Ml�l'TES: `f0710� by Nr. GaLcl, seconded by Dr. 1'os, to appro�c the OctoLcr B, 198i. Conr.;unit}' Uc�'elopment Commission minutes as uritten. M:. Oquist noted at this time that Mr. Gene Rezac had resi�ncd frum thc com;^ission. Cyp\ A L�OICE \'07'E. ALL COTISG A1�E. CHAIRPERSOS OQl'IST UECL:IHEU THk. `10TIOS CAKY.IEll CKASI`fUCSLT. 1. GOLF COCY.SE C}'UATE I',ark Burch reported that he had gathered the necessary information un thc propused site for a golf course and had met �ith a�;olf course arcl�itect u�o felt that a�ery nice golf course could Ge Guilt for a reaso:�al,le c�st. "fr. Burch then �:rote a memo outlinin� the findin�s and foruardcd tl�� mem� to the City� Council. Since then, eatensi�•e develop:;en2 plans hace Lccu . .. proposed for that area. A trucking company is ylannin� [o build ar�C an�:tl�c[ proposal for another comyan�� to put in a lumGer comyany, a retail sto�c, and an auto serrise center has been proposed. If that is approved, a E�lt cuursc tiould be e�tremel}' difficult or impossible to put in on the remair�in� la❑d. Dr. 1'os indicated that the land in the proposed area had a high assessed value. ?]r. Burch agreed and indicated tha: the golf rourse uouid ha�•e t,ee:, eapensive when i.ncluding the cost of acquisition of land. The arct�itect had said he could design a very nice, competitive course on the site, Lct ras not including rosts to acquire property. Mr. Burch indicated t'�a� he did not get any feedback from the Cit�• Council regarding his memo. I2 appears that the issue is r.o longer viable. The com.^�ission me,��ers at this time feel thep �ill look into the issuc further onl�• if tiie Cit� Co�,�il feels it aorthahile. CO7yURITY DE�'ELOPYEST COYNISSIDT ME£TI�G JA�UAR1' 14 1966 paf.� 2 4g MOTIOr by Dr. Vos, seconded by Mr. Cavel. that the Community Development Commission recommend to City Council that, due to the recent proposed development in the parcels being consideied for the golf course, unless the City Council givesthe commission direction otheruise, the commission feels that a golf course uould no2 De advantageous. r UPOr A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIrG AYE. CHAIRPERSOh OQUIST DECLARED THE M0T10� CARRIED UM1ArIMOL'SLY. - 2. DISCUSSIO^ OF 1966 CO�MU�ITY DEYELOPMEKT BLOCA CRA�T (CDBG) PSOPOSALS Hr. Burcfi indicated ifiat each year the City of Fridley receives CDBG funds. However, for 2986 there has been a significant reduction in the amount of funds allocated. The proposal, included in the agenda, Was reviewed uith the commission. One of the projects for 1986 includes Human Sett'ices. Human Services usually receive 15% of the funds and the Human Resources Committee usu�lly allocates those funds. :� list of allocations for 745; �;rrc re�'ie�:ed. Mr. Burch thought that much the same Would be done in 1986, bui Decause of reduced funding, some reductions in ihe pro�rams uo�ld nee� to be madc. Mr. Burch revieued improvements proposed for the center cit}• area. The County will be working on the Mississippi interseccion includin� wid�nii��; the intersection, installing nex signals, land�capinF thc boule�:�rd�, installing sideualks, and perhaps adding somc lightin�. Another item included in public improvements is related to tAe contest held last }�ear to design artwork for t6e center citp area. 'fhis is stili being considered. Mc. Burch reviewed the attachments includin� draaings of ttw proposed projects. The brick pattern uould be continued throu�h the intersection. Mr. Burch noted that the Count}• would pay for most of thc work on ihc intersection. The City' uould pa}' for landscaping, added costs for thc brickwork, and a portion of the signals and lighting. Mr. Burch indicated that a number of businessmen in the azea hacc mentioned doing something along Uni�ersity A��enue to make Fridley more noticeable. A corridor study �as suggested. This could include lighted street name sigr�s on L'niversity Avenue. Mr. Botch noced that chey had seen signs that were back lit and were ver}' nicelooking. Mr. Burch added that another project could De signs in the Plaza area which clearly show uhere the clinic, police department, Tar�et, etc. are locaced. This Mould also Ae part of the Plaza Center improvement. Mi. Burch indicated that in tne acea of crime prevention the police department is trying to nelp the lo�: income and elderly residents get good locks installed on their doors. Mr. ButcTr uill check to see what area of the City these low income and elderly persons reside. Dr. Yos felt cAat this uouid fit the goals af the Community Development Block Grant. COM L'\ITY DE�'ELOPME�? COM.NISSIOr MEETI�G JA�L'ARY 14, 1986 Pa�c J 49 Yr. Burch noted that another area is the development of Rivervieu Heights Park �hich involves acquisition of property and relocation of residents. ihe plan is progressing steadily. The committee revieued the attachment. Hr. Burch indicated that this project requires approzimately ;50,000. However, the funds could be matching funds if the City receives a LA�;CO� grant. Dr. Vos and Mr. Oquist indicated they liked ihe idea of the studp for improvements along University. , Mr. Hurch agreed that it �:ould be nice to do something because with tlic additional development, additional traffic uould be coming throu�h thc area. MOTIO� by Dr. Yos, seconded by Mr. Gabel, that the Community De��eloyment Commission support the follouing Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) projects in this order: 1) Human Services to receive 15'. of the allocation. 2) Crime Prevention Securit}� hardGare, 3) Uni��ersit�� and Mississippi li�•,hted street name si�ns, 4) lini��ersity Avenue corridor stud}', and 5) the reniaining funds be used for the Center Cit}• area for projects to be eithcr landscapi�i� and signage. L'E'0\ A�'OICE 1'OTE, ALL �'OTIt�G Al'E, CHAIHPERSO� OQCIST DECLAY,EU THE MDT10\ CAkHIEU L'�ASIMOCSLI'. 3. RE1IEl� £ARK1!�G OPDI!�A�CE Mr. Burch outlinadthe problems w'hich brougt�t about the ordina�ice, namel}• pcople vho are parking their cars on the roadua}� or right-of-w�ay for thc purpose of selling the vehicle. Mr. Burch noted that this has been particularly noticeable on East River Road. The ri�ht-of-way is for street utilities and signs. This has Deen difficult to enforce and thc proposed ordinance erould deal �.'ith the problem and hely with enforcement. Dr. �bs wanted to clarify that a��ehicle for sale can Ge parked on thc dri��e�a� but not on the road in front of the house. But if thc Foz Salc sign is remoced from the car, then it is okay to park the car on t1�e ruad. Mr. Oquist felt a resident should be able to �:ast�, grcase or fix thcir vehicle on the street as long as the vehicle is moved uithin 24 t�ours. This time o: Z4 6ours is spelied out in a current ordinance. Mr. Burch indicated that the "princiyai p�rpose" is for selling a vehicle but it ma}' De difficult to knocr if sellin6 is the principal purpose. Dr. Vos agteed �:ith the requirement that vehicles for sale should not be parked in the front or side }•ards or on the right-of-way�. He felt ttiat iil of the proposed ordinance uould be difficult to enforce because thcrc are too man}' variables. Mr. Oquist agreed. The commission members felt that 4t2 of the ordinancc was clear and fair, but felt that 4t1 should be reviewed. 5� PARKS P, RECREATIO!! CO^1�1ISSION NEETIN6 JULY 14 1986 Pl1GE 6 �'� The Comnission members discussed the possibility of having the meeting at another location other than City Hall. Mr, Kirk stated one possi- bility would be to hold the meeting at the Comnunity Education Center v+hich was right across fran Commons Park, - MOTION BY NR. GRRGARO� SECONDED BY XR. YOUNG, TO HOLD THE AUC. 4TN PUdLIC INFORMATZON H£ETING REGARDING COMMONS PARK AT THE FRIDLEY . CO+fMUNZTY EDUCATZON CENTER. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG RYE, CNAIAPERSON KOMDRICX DECLAItED TXF. MDTIOt: CRRRZED UNANIMDUSLY. b, Creekridge Park Triangular Piece of Property �1r, Kondrick stated there was a triangular piece of property in the northwest corner of Creekpark Lane that a developer wants to use for easement for driveways to buildable lots. Mr, Kondrick stated that in the Jan. 6, 198b, Parks R Recreation Commission minutes, Dr. Boudreau har± stat?d that Nr. Brickner was requesting that the City a11ow the purchase of the triangular piece of property in the northwest corner of Creekpark Lane. Dr, Boudreau had stated the advantages to the City would be additional tax revenue � from four new homes, 54,500 in park fees, removal of existinc� rented older home, the elimination of a special assessment cost with interest accruing against the city property� elimination of maintenance costs on buildable substandard lots, and the property would then conform to adjacent develop- ments. Also stated in the ninutes was that it was the concensus of the � Parks 8 Recreation Comnission menbers that they saw no problem with pur- suing this purchase with Mr, 8rickner. Ms. Schreiner stated she did not see any value in this property remaininq as park property. She a]so did not think the property should be given away. The other Cormission members agreed. IdOTIOf% BS' Y.R. GARGARD� SECd.:DED BY MP„ YOUNG, TO P.EAFFIRF! THE PAP.1C5 6 RE'CF2EA^_'ZOS CO^St175SZON'S POSITID77 AS DpCUS£l:Tf.D SA' THE JA'�. 6� 1986, PAR}:5 E r,�CR£ATZOt! COMXISSID'; N,ZNUTES A.YD TO URGE THE CITY TO SELL TXE TRIAt1GULAR fIECF, Of' i+RppE,�tTy p�,• CRE£Y,PFiHY, L,Ah+E SO MR. BP.ICKNEP., UP0.9 A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG RYE� Cf17IRPER50N XOf:DRZCK DECLARED THE MDTIOR CARRIED UNAITIMOUSLY. c. Meadowlands Park Update Mr. Kondrick stated that it had tome to the City's attention that after the Parks & Recreation Conanission received the conr�nts and ideas fror� , � t�e tleadoa;Tands Park citizen tomnittee, they had not made a motion to pass these can�nents and ideas on to the Planning Cormission and City Council. � � cinroF FRfDLEY PLANNING DIVISIQN MEMORANDUM MEhL) 7U: Jock Robertson, (brtumu�ity Develognent Director . MEFD FROM: Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator r�rD n�TE: July 30, 1986 I2�ARDING: Creekridge Park Expansion At Council's request staff has analyzed the possible aa7uisition of some or all of Riciiard Bricimer's property north of CYeekridge Park. � �e total azea of the existing park is approximately 2.8 acres. The park is presently imprwed with a single liqhted tennis court with an attached t�sketball glay area, a tot lot, a free play area with t�ckstop and a holding pond. In the winter, a lic�ted skating area apFxoximately 150' x 50' is also prw ided. AczTuisition of the aouthezly two �xoposed Brickner lots as well as all four proposed lots would yield the following park areas: (�e triangular portion held b� the City of Fridley is included in both options.) Pazcel Aieas 7bta1 P,c�uisition 2.9 acres R,O.w. - A+i .43 acres Triangular Portion - TP .16 acres Existing Park - F� 2.3 acses Paroel C - D .47 acres Paccel A - B .46 acres Assanhlage Areas (2 Options) � + � + C"Q c EP + TP + ArB-C-D = •:.��a� .�.yf- 2.93 acres 3.39 acres Presently the Assessors 1986 estimate � mazket value includes: $47,700 for the northerly g3rce1 vith t1�e preaia�sly existing house (proposed parcels A-B) and, $6,100 for the tack lot (pcopoaed parcels GD) which is valued as additiorial square footage for the front lot on1y. Botl� existin9 parcels with the house in plaoe were purchased b� Mr. Brickner in August of 1983 for $47,000. 4he oosts of acquiring the Brickner lots has been estimated using three methods: 53 Jock Robertson July 30, 1986 Page 2 1. Assessors estimate of aa3uisition cost assuming landlocked status for proposed Parcels C and D with builc�ble status for pzoposed Paroels A and B. (Also see attached mano) 2. Assessors estimate of aajuisition oost assuning buildable status f or all four proposed parcels. 3. Fstimating Paroels C and D at $.76/�. ft, (based on Gena Fae costs) with Paroels A and B estimated as builchble lots. Although actual aoquisition oosts would be based on a negotiated or court determined settlenent, the f ollowing table provides a range of financial exposure based on assemblage options and property status, i.e, buildable vs. landlocked: r• a �• r. • • •• ��• • n � v• �.� • . I PzoFosed � Assessors I AssessoLs I Parcels ( Estimatec3 � Estimated { I Acquisition I Aa7uisition I I costs I Costs 1 I(C & D Lant3- I(C & D Build- I I Lociced) l able) I I I I I 1 � C� D � $ 4,750 I $52,000 I I i I I I I A& S I 47,900 I 47,900 I I I I I I I ASC & D � $52,650 I $99,900 I I I ( Estimated I ► Aoquisition 1 ( Value of c,&n I I ProFerty Sasedl � on Gena Rae I { Oost I I 1 I I { $29,412 I 47 ,900 $77,312 An additional cost associated with the possible ao�uisition includes waiving the assessnent on the existing southerly p3roel iproFosed parcel C-D) which are currently held in abeyance but are accrain9 iriterest. The assessments for two future lots, for sewec, watei and street, oome to a total of $17,944 plus acczueo interest of $3,046.62 (through 7/3�/86) for a total of $20�990.62. FFAR7RTT.TTY I spoke with t'huck Boudreau and Jack Iti.rk rec�rding two other issues zelated to the potential aa�uisition including, the safety r�nifications of having a �rk subdivided bi a street ar�d the usability of the additional acceage. �e creation of an attractive nuisanoe is a uajor oonoern by staff. Safety would need to be analyzed, addcessing street signage and crosswalk designation. Good visibility would also have to be maintained. An euisting City gazk, Slmmit Squate is presernly developed on the north and south of Hughes Avenue. Dr. Boudreau laiew of no pedestzian/auto accidents associated with this pack layout. 54 Jock Robertson July 30, 1986 Page 3 In discussing usage. we concluded that the potential acquisition parcels wauld only be usable for g3ssive use such as tot lot glay, seating/picnicing and use for the glaygro�md program (especially if an open type shelter was prwided). Moving the tot lot across the street could be readily accamplished. However, t2�e benef it to the active use of the exi.sting park is questionable due to the urplaoe develognent which glaces the tennis crourt in the middle � the park pzErluding expansion of the existinq softball/play area to a more desireable size. Finally, Dr. Boudreau felt that the Parks and Recreation Commission would most likely be interested in analyzing the potential for any significant addition to the existing park. At their last meeting on July 14, 1986 they made a motion urging Gouncil to sell the triangular piece of property on CYeek Park Lane to Mr. Brickner. It should be noted that at that time the Cbrmnission was not apprised of the potential addition of any or all of the Bricknez property. cc: Leon Madsen John Flora Chuck Boudreau Jack Kick Attach. M-86-177 GG7 —�— I z � r � - - --L- — C�4EE/C --T-- � i, � P.S. k8fi-02 Creekridge Plat 2 �/��— N E. �= � — � Parcel Areas EP = 2.3 acres RW = .43 acres � TP = .16 acres � C-D = .47 acres ' ¢ A-B = .46 acres o —�% o � — I o / h N �� I � _ _ _ � _ .L � � _ � . � ,' � 1 � 6 N ; - o ,; G - � � � ?I �S g� � � T � � ^ R� _ L .� NE "Tp�� --- --------- � � ,,, , � , , , � . Qa , � �f , D �7L OT / p �� . ' Ej — ,. : �: �urc�r z KH�IT „�I„ P'1155ISSlPP/ sr 55 CITY OF FRIDLEY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUT'HORITY MEETING, JULY 10, 1486 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Commers called the July 1D, 1986, Housing & Redevelopment Authority ' meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Izrry Commers, Duane Prairie, John Meyer, and Walter Rasmussen (arrived at 9:10 p.m.) Members Absen[: Virginia Schnabel Others Presen[: Afayor William Nee Councilman Robert Barnette Councilman Dennis Schneider Councilman Sriaq Goodspeed I�asim Qureshi, HRA Director Dave Pewman, HRa A[[orney Jock Rober[son, Communi[y Development Director John Flora, Public Works Direc[or Rick Pribyl, Finance Director Sulie Burt, Asst. Finance Officer Samantha Orduno, M3nagemen[ Ass[. Robert Levy, Rice Plaza Gary Van House, Columbia Park Properties Gus Doty, Fridley Plaza pffice B�ilding Jim Winkels, Winfield Development Dave Weir, Woodbridge Properties PRESErTdTIO� OF PLAQUE - ELTL�RS PRIEDITIS: Afr. Commers presented a plaque io 2�ff. Priedi[is in appreciation i�r his ten years of service as a member of the Housing � Redevelopment Authority, r�. Coma�,ers stated with Dtr. Prieditis' architectural background, he made a major con[ribution [o the HR�1 and community. P'h�. Priedi[is stated he has learned a lot while serving on the HR?. and thanked Chairperson Commers and members of the HR� for his experiences. APPRO�'aL OF TIINUTES OF JUI�E 12, 1986: NATIOt� BY TfR, A�CIER, SECONDED BY MR. PRIIRIE, TO APPROVE THE JUNE 12, 1986, HOUSInG AND REDEVELOPAtEA'T AUTHORTTY MIr1�'SES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL V�i7IS:G AYE, CH.aITLPERS02i COM`tERS DECLARED TFiE MOTIO\ GIRRIEL' UhynIT�L'SLY. HOUSING 6 REDEVELOPP��f AUTHORTTY MEETII�G NLY 10 1986 YAGE 2 1. Il t?r. Qureshi stated the Coun[y has delayed the plans for the improve- ments to Mississippi Street because of difficulty in acquiring the right-of-way. Ae stated the Q1an is to begin construction next year, - Mr, Qureshi stated the NRA authorized an agreement with Northern States Power for relocation of the power lines; however,`because right-of-way is not fully acquired, i[ would be necessary to delay this pzoject until next year. He stated he understands NSP still agrees to the original estimated cost of $95,000. Mr. Qureshi stated no action is needed at this time by the HRA, but he wan[ed to keep them informed regerding this project. 2. UPDATE ON THE LUIQDGREn DEVELOPMEhT: Mr. Qureshi stated two items tha[ were cri[ical to meet [he timetable in ehe Lundgren projec[ was a new letter of credit and completion of the financing. He stated Mr. Lundgren has submitted the letter of credit and understands he is working diligentiy to complete the financing for the Augus[ deadline. Pfr. Meyer asked what this new letter of credit replaces. Mr. Qureshi stated the HRs1 had an agreement with Mr. Lundgren for his development which became null and void in May and this included a letter of credi[. He stated the HIU1 entered into a new agreement and a new letter of credit, ronforming to the new agreement, was requested. hh�, Afeyer questioned wha[ [his letter of credit means in terms of Mr. Lundgren�s project. D1r. Qureshi scated if the HRA performs atl their obligations and there is a default on [he part of the developer, the FIkA has the right to ca11 in this letter of credi[ for $200,000. Ns. Meyer asked if the HRA v�vld have to show damages for this amount. P1r. Nevc�an stated the letter of credit is active now and if ?�h. Lund- gren doesn't have his financing established by August 1, under the terms of the contract and letter of credit, the HRA can call for the full amount of $200,000. Mr. Qureshi stated as parc of the agreemen[ with Mr. Lundgren, the HRd would acquire property for the construction of the building. He requested the HRA consider Resolution No. HIiA 9-1986 which auth- orizes the acquisition of Lot 1, BLock I, SyLvan Hi11s Plat 7, 248 Pfississippi Street by eminent dovain proceedings, subject to receipt of the financiaZ corsumitment £ror.t Mr. Lundgren. HOUSI�G b RED£�'ELOPPIEIIT AUTHORITY AfEETING JULY 10 1966 P�GE 3 Mr. Newrran stated the reason the resolu[ion is before the HRA a[ this time is because title [o this property must be delivered by December 1 and the soonest the property could be acquired by eminent domain is 90 days. He stated they will continue Co negot- iate wi[h the owner to acquire the property without going through the eminent domain proceeding. _ MOTIU,e BY t�t. PRAIRIE, SECONDED BY MEt. MEYER, TO APPROVE RESOLllTION N0, HRA 9-1986 DIRECTIrG COtiDEPIIYITION AND DETERrffr�NG.THE NECESSITY FOR AIv'D AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIr PROPERTY BY PROCEEDINGS IIv ETIINEnT DONAIN ON LOT 1, BLOCK 1, SYLVAn HILLS PLAT 7, 248 AIISSISSIPPI STREET N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSOIv' COPQIERS DECLARED THE MOTION Ci+RRIED UrANIMOUSLY. 4. ST�1TU5 REPORT Or COLUMBL4 P�.RI: PROPERTIFS E};PATSIOr PROJECT: Mr. Qureshi s[ated in 1982, the HRA entered into an agreement with Columhia Park Properties for construction of their clinic as [he first phase of development. He sta[ed part of the agreemen[ was the op[ion to acquire the proper[y west of [he clinic for an addi[ion. 1�K. Qureshi stated there were commun:cations this spring with Columbia Park Properties regarding tt;eir plans to proceed with this addition and to rt�ake sure the cons[ruction would be in conformance with the agreemen[ entered inco with the F1Ra. Ah�. Qureshi stated a communica[ion vas received from Columbia Park Properties on June 12, 1986 where they indicated they would be unable to proceed with this developmen[ and wanted [o rtake arrange- men[s to lease the proper[y. Tfr . Van House, Columbia Park Properties, stated [he development for Colur.�bia park ProperCies has been an excellent experience and they continue to plan for ex[�nsion and to expand their practice at the Fridlew� location. He stated a number of factors have happened in the fiealLh care community since 1982 characterized by a tremendous amount of competition led by the HMO organizations. He stated [heir practices have no[ been growing as fast as anticipaCed, however, they are expanding a[ o[her sites including a$5,000,000 project in Columbia Heights. Tfr. Van House staced Columbia Park Properties feel they have to be reare conservative in their building plans for the next several years, but if [hey continue [o grow, they should be in a position to expand at Fridley. He stated Columbia Park Properties has three other Locations and the Fridley facility is their specialiy center anc� serves as a fe_der from the other clic�ics. HOUSING 6 REDE�'ELOP*SEr'T AUTkiORITY MEETING JITLY 10 1986 P�GE 4 t�fr. Van House stated they are asking for coniinued support from the HRA in resolving a short term problem with their parking. He sta[ed they have a temporary permit for some gravel parking, how- ever, i[ expired the end of June and they need some remedial action in order to continue the parking. hh. Qureshi stated because Columbia Park Properties have decided - no[ [o expand at this time, they propose to lease the property [o serve their parking needs. He stated the HRA would have to decide whether they wish to extend the op[ion for [wo more years by leasing property to them. He stated, hopefully,before the end of the two years, Columbia Park Properties can firm up their plans and proceed with construction. He stated if this cannot be accomplished, they would have no further rights to the property. Pfr. Qureshi stated from a planning point of view; it makes more sense for [he clinic to expand zather than bringing in another development to the west of the clinic's property. Ph-, Qureshi sta[ed staff woUld recommend the HRA enter in[o a lease agreement for two years beginning June 1, 1986 at [he rate of $15,OD0 per year. He stated after this period, the op[ion on the property would expire. He s[ated [he por[ion of the property used for parking should be blacktopped and the balance tes[ored as it was before the [emporary parking permit, T10TIOh BY MR. PRr1IRIE, SECONDED BY DfR, PIEYER, TO APPROVE THE PROPOS�L SET FORTH BY THE }iR� DIl2ECTOR FOR THE tQt?. TO E\TETD THE OPTION On THIS PROPERTY FOR 1W0 YEARS Or THE COA'DITION COLUPffiIA P�RK PROPERTIES SATISF�CTORILY SLACKTOP A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY TO BE US£D FOR PaR1:IHG AND RESTiJRE THE BALANCE TO THE COh'DITIOh IT WAS IT: BEFORE, WHZCti IS SODDING. IF AT THE END OF THIS TWO YE�1R PERIOD, CON- STRUCTION kW S NOT BEGUN, THE OPTION THEY H�\'E TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY WILL ALSO EXPIRE. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, C2LaIRPERSON CO;�L"fERS DECLARED THE MOTIOIv C�RRIED UN:1NIPf0USLY. 5. UPD:�TE ON LARE POIr'TE CORPOP.�TE CENTER: Thzs item will be cmzsidered later in the meeting. 6. ST:�TUS R£POR`T 0:� F�RAING FOR FRIDLEl' PL'.ZA OFFICE EL'ILDIIdG PAP.TNEP.SHIP: Tk. Qureshi stated the HRA received a copy of a letter sent [o Ph. Doty and the trustee of the fYidley Plaza Office Building Partnership dated June 30, 1986, by Mr. Dave Newman. He stated this let[er is in regard to non-payment for use of [he parking lot. Ph�. Newrran stated the HR.4 received a copy of the lease they entered into aitt� the Fridley PZaza Office Building Partnership for joint use of the parking lot. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AtITHORITY MEETING NLY 10 1986 PAGE 5 I� . Newman s[ated the lease provides that beginning on July 1 of las[ year, the tenant was to pay rental of $8D0 per month for the non-exclusive use of the parking lot. He s[ated none of the pay- ments have been made. I�. Newman stated correspondnece has been sent to Mr. Doty regarding _ his in[entions, but no formal response has been received. Mr. Newman s[ated a letter was sent on April 30, 1986 to Mr. Do[y and [he [rustee regarding this default. He stated he has not re- ceived any wri[ten correspondence in reply to his let[er. I�K. Newman s[ated he felt the HRA should be aware of this situation so a determination can be made on how [hey wish to pro�eed. Mr, Doty stated the lease also provides for 166 parking spaces and there ate only 142 and this number decreases with spaces reserved for City visitors and vehicles and the handicapped parking. He stated there has been a parking problem for [he last 18 months and it has been that long since he brought i[ to the atten[ion of Ci[y officials. He stated to ignore the problem isn't much of a solution. He stated [he $800/month isn't [he problem, but he wants someone to talk to them [o resolve the parking problem, He sta[ed if there were 166 spaces, there wouldn't be a problem. D�. Qureshi stated arrangemen[s have been m�de with Target to use [heir lo[ to park 27 vehicles. He s[a[ed if you take that into consideration, there are more chan 166 spaces for the City Aall and the office building. He stated [heze are spaces available to park 166 vehicles, even though all of [hese aren't striped. Ptr. Qureshi sCa[ed if it is the desire to show 166 parking spaces, ochers could be striped to meet this requirement. He stated [he argument that they don't have 166 parking spaces so they are not going to pa}' the amount provided for in the lease agreement doesn't seem reasonable. P�. Doty sta[ed all he is asking is for his day in court and for someone [o lis[en. He suggested the parking between the office building and City Ha11 be designated as visitor parking and limited [o one-half hour, wi[h ten minute parking along [he curb. He stated if tlne width of [he parkzng spaces was reduced fzom 10 feet to 9 feet, you vould gain 12 additional spaces. Pir, Doty stated boCh the clinic and Target have nine foot parking spaces. Mr. Qureshi stated he has discussed with the Cicy Council the possibility of reducing the width of some parking spaces. I�h. Co�ers asked who was responsible and why someone hadn't talked with t�s. Dot�•. HOUSIhG & REDEI'ELOPMEA'T AL�THORITY MEETII3G JULY 10 1986 PAGE 6 1�. 13ewman stated he felt this was a two-way street. He stated several efforts were made to contact Fh. Doty and he promised a letter in which he would ou[line his position, bu[ it was never received. Mr. Doty stated he does plead suilty in not vriting a letCer, bu[ would rather talk [o them in person. I�h. Commers felt staff and Mr. Doty should try to solve this problem and if they cannot, the HI2A will then address it. 1�, Meyer stated if the liR� is guaranteeing I66 parking spaces, he feels they have an obligation to furnish these and, if this cannot be done, the lease agreement should be revised. Mr. Doty stated it has been rata basis. He stated the isn't sufficient parking. suggested the cost be reduced on a pro- issue isn't really the cost, but there htr, newman s[ated he and s[aff would try to solve this problem with Mr. Doty. He s[ated if it can't be resolved by the next meeting, it �y be necessary to proceed wi[h some 1ega1 action, 7. WINFIELD DEVELOPPIEA"T'S REQIIEST FOR ASSISTANCE: 1fi-. Qureshi s[ated I•h . Winkels appeared before the tiR.a a[ their last meeting and ad¢ised them about the soil problems a[ [heir proposed construction site. He stated Winfield Development is requesting assistance from [he HRA to correc[ the soil problems. Mr. Qureshi stated the HRA in the past has provided assistance for soil correction to several developments such as Mr. Paschke's, Johnson Printing and Vantage Companies. He state�3 staff would recommend the ARA provide $30,000 in assistance as [he estimated cost for correction is in excess of $116,000. Ph. Winkels stated I5,000 yards of rr�a[erial need to be removed. He stated he understands there is some concern why they didn'[ take this in[o consideration when the property was purchased four years ago. He stated they did no[ anticipate the severity of Che problem and it came to light when the U.S. Swim & Fi[ness C1ub was nnd�_r c�nstruction. Pfr. Wznkels sta[ed the material [o be rer.nved is wF�ere actual construction uf the building would take p�ace and a part of [he parking area. He stated it doesn't involve the entire site, hut goes beyond the building itself. Mr, Qureshi sta[ed the property is not in a Redevelopment District. He s[ated if this was the desire of the HRA, it would be necessary to go through the formal procedures to include it in the increment district. HOLSING & RED£VELOPMEA"T AtSTfiORITY t�ETII:G JULY 10 1986 PAGE 7 Ph. Meyer stated he thought i[ was unusual that Winfield Develop- men[ didn't have knowledge of the poor soil conditions when they purchased the property. Mr. Winkels sta[ed they did have soil tests done and the logical question now is if [hey are coming back after the fact. He stated - the severity of [he problem was not known at [hat time. I•h. Winkels s[ated they are trying for an upscale project and a11 indicators are the market is right for such a building. He stated [hey can't cons[ruct something that doesn't make sense economically. He s[ated they may be asking for a fair amount in terms of percent- ages, bu[ didn'[ feel it was out of line in [erms of the value of the projec[ and amount of taxes generated, A1r. Commers sta[ed the recommendacion from scaff is for $30,000 in assistance. He asked I�h. Winkels if he was s=_ying if [hey have [he $90,000 requested the projec[ would definitely proceed. Ptr, Winkels scated [hey have to make some decisions in the nex[ several wecks and should know if [he}• wi11 receive [he bond. H� sta[ed he is no[ saying if [hey don'[ receive the assistance, the project wouldn't proceed. He s[ated [hey want to have a11 [he information available to make [he bes[ decision. Ah'. Qureshi sta[ed taking into accoun[ wha[ has been done in the pas[, $30,000 seems a reasonable figure, bu[ i[ is the HRA's prerogative to increase or decrease this amoun[. Ph-. Prairie stated i[ may be a 1ittle higher than [he others, but seemed reasonable. P1r. Meyer s[a[ed if the facts are [hat [he soil carrection is going to be, basicall��, under [he building, it is crucial [o the develop- rr�nt and felt [he $30,000 figure was reasonable. ?pTIO\ BY PIIt, PfEYER, SECOrDED B1' rIIt, PR.'+IRZE, TO APPROVE, IN CONCEPT, $30,000 IN ASSIS2'AIv*CE TO WINFIGLD DLVF.LOP*]EhT TAKIKG INTO CO�SIDERF.TIOt: THE FaCTS hTOWI� TOD:1Y .�i�D DIRECT STr`.FF TO J?;i�W ?. FUR?L'-S. AGREEMEI�T FOR THE A'E�'T HRA tfEET1t�G TO Tal:E THF riECESSARY STL'PS TO INCLUDE THIS PFOPERTY II� THE INCRE*fEnT DISTRICT, UPO\ A VOICE VOTE, �LL VOTING AYE, CH<1IRPERSOn CO*L�fERS DECIARED TNE MOTION CARRIED UNAI�IMOUSLY, 8. CONSIDEFUTION OF FII�.1L P:1Y*fErT FOR TARGET PROJECT: t�h. Coc^iers asked about the $60,000 excess proposed to be set aside for futi:re perimeter impro��ements. i�h. Quz-eshi stated this excess cou.kd be handled in sever�l way$; either to se[ this anourc aside for future improvemen[s in Phase II or [o close Phase I of the Target project. He sta[ed future improvements could be considered i❑ conjunction with the Mississippi Street improvement. HOUSIKG & REDEVELOPMEr'T ALTfHORITY MEETING JULY 10 1986 PAGE 8 MOTION BY I�ht. PRAIRIE, SECONDED BY MR. MEYER, TO RECEIVE THIS ItvFOR*f�TION AND INSTRllCT STAFF TO CLOSE THE TARGET PRO,TECf WTTH THE EXCESS TO BE RETURNED TO THE HRA'S �NERAL PUND: WITH TKE UNDERSTAIv'DING ADDITIONAL IPff'ROVEMEb'TS WILL HAVE TO BE DO�IE 2N CONNNCTION WITH THE MISSISSIPPI STREET IrII'ROVEMENT, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON COMhfERS DECIARED THE - MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 9, CI.ATMS: PtOTION BY 1�92. MEYER, SECONDED BY I�&2, PRAIRIE, TO APPROVE THE CHECK REGISTER DATED NLY 1�, 1986. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON CODQtERS DECLARED THE PfOTION CJ�RRIED UNANIMOUSLY. A�. Robertson stated a claim has been received from Storer Cab1e in the amount of $5,000 for the reloca[ion of underground cable. He sta[ed [he HRA has previously agreed [o pay [his cost and [he work has been completed and a cer[ificate of comple[ion submitted. D]OTION BY MR. PR4IRIE, SECOA'DE➢ BY Mit. P�YER, TO aUTHORIZE PAYMEhT OF $5,000 TO STORER C�$LE FOR THE RELOC�TION OF 1Jr'DERGROUND G1BLE, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTItvG AYE, CHAIRPERSON CObL"fERS DECLARED THE DfOTION CARRIED UIv'aNID10USLY, 10. OTHER BUSIrESS: A, RICE PL�2� - PII2. LE�'Y: Pfr. Levy, Rice Plaza, stated he would like to request the HRd to either remove Rice Plaza from their Redevelopment District or proceed witb a plan Co acquire the en[ire parcel. P7. Levy stated he understands the County has engaged appraisers co look at the property on a joint basis relative to the needs of thc HR� and County. He stated he understands tfie appraisers have pro- vided sa:ne preliminary informacion. Th. Comrrers s[ated ihe 14R�+ has not been presented with any infor- mation from the appraiser. He s[ated he had no problem with considering [his item at ihe next meeting, if figures are available. Mr. Qureshi felt two elements are involved. He stated one is the general philosophy if the HRa wants to acquire [he property at this time when they don't have approved plans for this site. He stated, on the other hand, if the HRA felt it was prudent to acquire it, cost figures would have co be presented at the next meeting. P�. Commers feit this sl�ouid �e cone so socae decision could be made whether or not to acquire the property so I� . Levy and his tenants will know where they stand. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING. NLY 10. 1986 PAGE 9 t�tr. Gommers stated [he history of che EiRA has been, unless there is a specific purpose to acquire property, they are hesitant to do so and hold it for any length of time. He felt the distinction here if property is being [aken for right-of-way and the Lundgren project, it would make sense to proceed and perhaps acquire the entire parcel. He stated, however, they may not financially be in a position to do so. Mr, prairie stated he has no[ heard of any costs and felt further informa[ion was needed before considering [his item. Mr. Meyer s[ated he is not philosophically opposed to taking the entire parcel. He sta[ed i[ would depend on the cost and these figures should be available by the August HRA meeting, Mr. Levy sta[ed there is a"range" figure, but he hasn't had a chance to evaluate i[. He felt if [hey don't reach a point after the Augus[ meeting where the HRA either takes them out of the Redevelopmen[ District or have a negotia[ion process to acquire the proper[y, [he Lines would be drawn from which they could work. He stated he would wait un[il the August mee[ing so the HR� can review the cost figures. Mr. Levy stated the appraiser is reluctan[ to share the figures wi[hout specific au[horization from [he County and HAA. He stated he would like [he oppor[uni[y to review [hem and respond before [he August mepting. D�. Newman s[ated he didn'[ have a problem with the appraiser re- leasing these figures, bu[ i[ is [he County who ordered the appraisal and he would have to contact them. Mr. Commers asked Mr. Newman to convey to [he Coun[y tha[ the HRn has no objections to disclosing these appraisal figures. hh. Newma❑ stated it would seem prudent co have Ph. Levy's feedback for the next meeting. B, �PPOIh"fMEn'i' OF HRa EXECtiTIlTE DIRECTOR: Atr. Qureshi stated ia accordance with an agreement between the City and the HRa, it is necessary for the HR�1 to approve the selection of an Executive Director. He stated i1r. Jock Rober[son was hired as tne City's Community Development Director and has assumed the job res- ponsibilities once held by Jerry Boardman who served as the Executive Director of the �. t�. Qureshi stated ar informa[ional pzck.et regarding t�fr. Robertson`s background h3s been six6mi[ted to [he iiR�. and he wouLd recormnend Mr. Ro6erts�ia be consi�iesed for appointment as the Executive Director. HOUSING 6 REDEVELOPMEA'T AIITHORITY MEETING JULY IO 1986 PAGE 10 Th-. Commers stated he felt this matter should be carried over to the next meeting and placed on the HRA's agenda as a formal item so a vote may be taken by the HRA. C. APPOINTMENT OF VICE-CNAIRPERSON OF Tt� HR.1: Mr. Commers requested that the appointmen[ of a Vice-Chairperson for [he HRA be placed on the agenda for [he nex[ meeting. RECESS: Chairperson Commers declared a recess at 9:05 p.m. RECO:vR'EIQED : Chairperson Cortaners reconvened the meeting at 9:30 p.m. The following members were present; Chaitperson Coimners, Duane Prairie, John Pleyer and Walter Rasmussen. 5. UPDATE On I/+KE POIr'TE CORPOPv1TE CENTER: Pff . Newman stated the HRA has received correspondence ou[ling the summary of some proposals staff presented in an attempt to resolve the impasse with Woodbridge Properties. Ptr. Newman sta[ed a meeting uas held on Tuesday, July 8, 1986 which Chairperson Commers attended and what evolved from that session were suggestions the developer should meet certain benchmarks for con- struction. He stated the developer didn'[ want to be tied to a cer[ain schedule because of fluc[uations in the market and conflicts with permits. He stated, by the same token, Che staff wanted certain requirements for perfozmance through the course of this development. l�h. Newman stated the developer was concerned because of the delays with the Indireet Source Permit and contracts being re-bid, he is incurring some damages. He stated when construction does commence, landscaping will not be completed as originally visioned, P1r. Newm3n sLaYed the concept proposed was if the developer could conplete the entire pro,iect and meet benchmarks of 120,000 square feet co�anleted bt next yeaz; 2Q4,000 square feet completed in five years; 40�,060 scpaaxe feet comp2eted in ten years and 749,000 square feet completed in fifteen years, he Qrohably should be entitled to the $5.6 million revenue note plus interest. t�. Newman stated if the increment isn't sufficient to make the annual payment, it is lost forever. He stated if the developer is able [o meet these benchmarks, the payment could be recovered at the end. HOUSING & REDEVELOP*fEA'T AUTHORITY MEETII�G,_JULY 10 1986 PAGE I1 h7. Newman s[ated it is anticipated the costs of the public im- provements will exceed the amount budgeted. He stated it was agreed the HRA will share those costs with the developer to the ex[en[ they exceed the original projections. Mr. Newman stated the }�gA agzees to make the improvements [o Highway 65 which may be required under the Indirect Source Permit. He stated the parties _ will cooperate to obtain the Indirec[ Source Permit for the least amount of improvemen[ to Highway 65. Pfr. Aewman stated the next step would be for the developer to provide the sum of $1,000,000 to the ilRa and they, in [urn, would provide him wi[h a deed for Phase I parcel and then complete acquisi[ion of the Johnsan property. He eteted within IS da�s after receipt of the $1,000,000, contracts would be ac:arded for the public improvements, with [he excep[ion of [he landscaping. Mr. Newman stated within 12 months of awarding the firs[ contrac[, the HRA agrees to complete the improvements on the site. Aff. Newman sta[ed construc[ion would commence four months after conveyance of this parcel or by November 30 of this year, wi[h construction comple[ed within 30 mon[hs. He stated [he buildings would be substantially comple[ed, but the interior walls may not be in place until space is leased. Nh. Newman stated [hose dates of completion may be delayed in the event the permits which need to be issued by the Ci[y are no[ given. tle stated the City would not unreasonably withhold the permits if plans are consis[en[ wi[h the agreemen[. Mr. Newman stated if the City can'[ have [he improvements of Highway 65 finished by July L, 1989 because of reqUirements of the Indirect Source Permit, the developers obliga[ion to meet [hese construction deadlines will be set back for a likely amoun[ of time. I�h. Newman sta[ed if the developer completes the construction schedule and the increments are not sufficient, the HRA agrees to pay that sum to him, He stated those arrearages will accrue interest at the rate of 90 day Treasury Bills and if an arrearage occurs, it allows the HR� to go in and fund those arrearages. D�. Newirian stated Woodbridge, to date, has incurred some substantial engineering costs estimated at a6oUt $75,000 for preparation of the public improvements on the site. He stated 4loodbridge has decided to fron[ those expenses, howeve_, orce the $1,000,000 is paid, the HR+ would reimburse for these costs providing they are reasonable and in line with cus[omary charges. I�fr. Commers stated this was tt�e first tis,e he had heard about these charges and asked if it vas wri[ten that tney reicburse the consultant or the developes. 2�h'. :�'ewman stated they would reimborse the con- sultant. NOUSSNG & REDEVELOPTSEA'T AUTHORITY MEETING NLY 10 1986 PaGE 12 Mr, Qureshi stated there was a similar approach in [he other agree- ment that when the $1,000,000 was received, the HRA would take res- ponsibility for the engineering costs. Mr. Rasmussen asked if there was a list on these costs. Mr. Qureshi stated the}' siiould be reasonable and comparable to industr}• standards. Mr. Rasmussen stated that he does not want the developer to keep comin� back �to HRA for fur }�e ssistance ever�• t'me he h s s me pro6le _ t�, f�feyer askeax i� p�ans were prepare� under t�e �irection oni�the developer. I�h. Qureshi stated it was a combined effort between the developer and the City staff. Mr. Meyer asked if these plans were designed according to standards and concepts agreed to by [he City staff and if the City controlled development plans just as though the developer wasn't in the picture. Mr. Flora answered in the affira�ative. Ak. Newman stated what is proposed is a significant departure re- garding the level of assistance provided to the developer. He stated due to the scope aod quality of the development, the HR�1 can justify why they rr�ay want to deviate from their customary practices. P�. Newman stated increment will go to pay the General Obligation Bond and if not enough increment is generated to pay the limited Revenue Note that is lost forever. Mr. Newman stated if the developer meets [he benchmark standards, then the ttRA guaran[ees he will re- ceive a11 the payments he is guaranteed under the Limited Revenue �ote. Pfr. Pteyer stated he felt the development schedule was ultra-conscrvative. He questioned if there was any way the developer could assign all the rights gtanted to him to some other developer. I�. New�n stated this could be done, but a11 the agree.nen[s would remain in force. P�. Rasc�ussen asked if the HRA would have the right to approve or disapprove such an arrangement, Mr. Newman stated he believed they would no[. Dk, Yrairie asked if this occurred, if the quality of the developnent had to be main[ained. ih-. Newman stated there is a quality develop- ment pZan attached to the agreement aiid a developer would be required to meet these standards. I�'h. Newman stated the agreement was restructured, after consultation with the bond counsei, and if the Hlta concurs with this agreement, it could be approved subject to technical changes as he felt some phrasing �y have to be reworded. He s[ated he wanted to further clarify that even though the FiRA is guaranteeing thi.s payment, it isn't going to impair the abili[y of the Hk� to proceed with other developments. HOUSING � REDEVELOPMENT AVfHORITY MEETING NY 10 1986 PAGE 13 I�k. Newman stated it is possi6le for the developer to meet his cons[ruction schedule and not make enough increment to pay his Limited Revenue Note. He stated the HRA is then obligated to make up that deficiency, t�. Newman stated it is extremely un- likely this would occur. He stated if the developer is meeting his benchmarks and the increments aren't sufficient, the HRA can buy a 1Yeasury Bill to secure its potentiai future obliga[ion. Mayor Nee asked if something changed in Lhe agzeement to go be}•ond an 18 year payment. I�k. Newman stated because of the initial delay and construction could not begin as intended, the developer believes it is costing him considerably. Mr. Newman stated he wi11 also not be able to proceed with the next phaseof construction until all the re- quirements of the Indirect Source Permit have been met. r�yor Nee stated he did not like the option for the extra seven years. He felt to extend it one year would be acceptable, but to extend it for seven years is ano[her issue. Pfr. Newman stated it is extremely remo� [his would happen if develop- ment occurs as under this agreemen[, He stated if, in fact, the developer performs according to this standard, he believed the benefit wi11 be such that he will receive his paymen[s under the Limi[ed Revenue Note in the stated 18 years. A�yor Nee stated he can accept [he extra $1,000,000 for improvemen[ of the intezsection, but i[ bothers him that they can't go forever in tapping [he public coffers on increment, someCimes it has [o pay back, Ph-. Newman stated if this project is compLeted, it will be the largest total development in the City and have the largest concen[- ration of employees. Ne stated it is [he decision of the HRA and City Council to make a determination if i[ is worth it and to deviate some fron their norms. Dfayor Tee stated when you talk about a 25 year payoff, something nore has to revolve. He stated the revenue bond is changed and made a guarantee by the HR.� and it wasn't this way before, and to guarantee the entire bond is an entirely different s[ory. Councilman Barnette stated the concensus of the Council was [o go along with the extra year because of delays in construction, but felt limits need te be sei, Councilman Schneider stated the risk has shifted to the Giry and it shouldn't be there. Mr. Newman [hought it could be looked at in two ways. He stated there is a greater obligation by the HRA, but the developer is taking the risk of ineeting these cons[ruction phases schedule. �, Weir stated when they began plans for this project, no one knew they would be limi[ed to one building. He stated as a result of the requirements imposed by the State through tF.e Indirect Source ' Permit, they cannot market any space on this property, other than the one building and restaurant, until improvements are made to the intersection. He stated this is a major difference than what was con[empla[ed and what they wished to accomplish on this si[e. Mr, Weir stated they would prefer not to have a schedule. He stated they are in the business of investment buiLding and may not have tenants when th� begin construction, as opposed to having a tenant sign a lease and then begin construction of their building. Mayor Nee felt if they are going to renego[iate the contract, it should go back to the beginning. He s[ated he assumes an experienced builder would know what is required such as the Indirect Source Permit. He felt when they entered in[o [he agreement, the developer accepted this kind of hazard. He stated he didn't agree it was 100% of the Ci[y's responsibility to anticipate the reac[ion of the Highway Depar[- ment and the Pollution Control Agency. He sta[ed staff convinced him �o pay the cost of the interseccion improvement, but beyond tha[ he has problems. p�, Meyer stated he is concerned and understands the agreemenc has been broadened far beyond che original agreement. He stated he had previ- ously expressed his opinion that the HRA had gone about as far as they could on the basis of s[aff recommendations. He asked if staff felt they could go from 18 to 25 years. �, rewman stated they aren't agreeing to it, but it is a possibility. t�tr. Commers sta[ed the HRA is saying this is a Redevelopment District set up for 25 years. He stated it is agreed everything would be done in 18 years, but since it i5 a 25 year district, there is the option to re-bond to the extent of the full district. He stated bonds were issued for a shorter period, even though it was a 25 year district. He stated it seems it would be bet[er to pay it off as soon as possible to £:ee additional funds. rfr. Newman sta[ed under the original agreement, the note itself would have been paid off in 18 years and, if there were any arrearages, they would have been forgiven. He stated because of the survival of arrear- ages, there is a po[ential to fund that payment for a longer period. p�. Qureshi stated this development will be quality construction and, when the compleced, the value would be about $ 50,000,000. He stated the decision to be made by the HRA is if it is wortt� tt�e risk. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY rfEETING JULY 10 1986 P�GE 15 t�k. Qureshi stated the help would be about 15% upfront and if the developer performs [o the standards set by the HRA, he receives his money or else he loses. He stated the agreement provides if the increment received is no[ sufficien[ to a�ake any of the scheduled payrt.ents under the Limited Revenue Note, the HRA would pay the loss wi[h interest. Nh. Qureshi stated Ph. Weir is willing to forego the interest, if given more time for construction of the first building. t�. Qureshi stated the question has been asked if [he HRA is giving too much. He sta[ed there is so much uncertainty in the market and tax s[ruc[ure so this would be a difficult question ta answer. He felt substan[ial heiP is being provided, but if the anticipated qualit�� developmen[ occurs it would be worth it. Afayor Nee stated the HRA is guaranteeing the payment of the note and this wasn't in the original agreement, t�h, Qureshi stated it is guaran[eed only if the developer performs as ou[lined in the agreemen[. hlsyor Nee sta[ed the present agreement states if he performs, the HRa wi11 pay off the note. N7, Qureshi stated what was in the previous agreement was the developer loses the no[e, if he doesn'[ perform. Councilman Schneider asked why inerement wouldn't be generated if the developer performs to [he standards ou[lined in [he agreement. hh. Commers stated there may not be enough taxes generated to obtain [he increment. Ph-, Qureshi s[ated the question is if the develocer performs, should he get Che revenue note paid. He sta[ed thece are certain henchmarks for this development khich must be met and if this is done, only then does he receive tne additional HRA help. r1r. Weir stated no one believed the Indirect Source Permi[ would have restrictions over the rate of their deveLopment. He thought tliey would be able to construct three or four buildings at a time in order to mak.e the increment available. He stated the PCA is now requiring a complete installation of the improvements as opposed to simply an endorsement that improvements will be completed. I�fr . Weir sta[ed if construction cannot proceed, it may preclude delivery of the incre- ment, 2�h. Cor�mers stated there are a lot of technicalities they could get in[o, 6ut feit it comes do�:n in the issue if t4te tiRo'. warets the project and, if [he developer performs, should [ne HR1 guarantce he gets his monay. He stated if he doesn't perform, he. would 1osz. Mr. Commers stated there is no quesxion, if the develoaer performs, the HRa wi11 HOUSING & REDEVELOPPfEr"f AUT'ttORITY MEETING NLY 10 1986 p�� 16 fiave su6stantial tax increment to meet all their obligations. He stated it is the question of how they capture it and how they uae it. t� . Qureshi suggested two changes be made in the Addendum to the Contract with Lake Pointe Investment Company dated .Tuly 9, 1986. He stated one change would be to extend the date of comple[ion for the first 120,000 square feet from December, 1987 to June, 1988. He stated " the other change is to etiminate the interes[ payments on the Limited Revenue Note which is covered under It� 11 of the agreement. Nh. Commers stated there are some other technical i[ems tha[ need to be reviewed for possible change. Mr, Rasmussen asked if more [ime was needed to refine the agreement. Mr. Qureshi stated if the HRA felt the generel structure of the agree- ment was reasonable, it should be approved because time is of the greates[ essence as several months of the construction season have already been lost. Mr. Qureshi stated if the agreement is approved, he would request a special Council meeting on Ju1y 14 to consider the bids. Nh. Newrt�n stated he understands r�. Prairie has indicated he would abs[ain from any vote on this agreement as his construc[ion company is one of the bidders on [his project. MOTIO� BY MR, RASTAISSEN, SECOr'DED SY MR. ME1�R, TO APPR6\'E THE ADDENDUM TO CO\TRACT FOR PRI�ATE REDEVELOPMEi."T BY AA� SET4lEEN THE HRr1 AND IA1iE POIrTE INVESTME:[TT COD1PaNY DATED NLl' 9, 1986 WITH THE D�TE FOR SUB- STANTIAL COPIPLETION OF THE FIRST 120,000 SQUARE FEET TO BE CHANGED FROP1 DECEPIBER 31, 1981 TO JUNE 30, 1988 AI�'D TO ELIPIIN.�.'TE THE Ir"fEREST PA1P1ErTS Otd THE LIMITED REVENUE TOTE AS C0�'ERED UI�DER ITE,f I1 OF TiiIS AQtEEMENT, UPO� A VOICE VOTE, CH�.IFPERS01 COPQSERS, PIIt. RASPIUSSEN, A�D rIIt. MEYER VOTED AIE, MR. PILIIRIE ABST�IrED FRO*1 VQTING. CHAIRPERSON COTL�fERS DECIARED THE MOTION C�RRIED UN�NIMOUSLY, Pfr , Weir stated if it wasn't for the commitment they had from day one from the HR�, City Council and staff, they would he looking at a far different concept plan for this site. Councilman Barnette stated to Mc. Gorraners that at [he last meeting, he was very adamant abwt his feelings the HR9 gave all they could for this project. He stated he respected that position, but now has the feeling he is convinced the ar.tion taken by the iiRA is good. Mr. Commers stated in eva�uatin� the risk the HRA is undertaking, he fe2t iE was vexy minimal in respect to the benefits they would receive. NOUSING & REDEVELOPMEI�"T AUTHORITY MEETING JULY 10 1486 P�GE 17 t�tr. Qureshi stated it may be eppropriate to ask I�fr. Weir if the agreement is acceptable to him. Mr, Weir stated as a matter of procedure, he Would recommend it to the pension fund people who are involved with this project, _ Mr. Commers stated he hopes the developer wi11 be able to perform like everyone wishes. Mr. Weir stated they are Looking forWard to being here in Fridley a Long time. Mr. Qureshi stated he has expressed his feelings before that the only reason staff felt they should proceed is because of the quality of this projec[ and the ultimate benefit to the community. He sta[ed he hoped [hey have arrived at an agreement and can proceed full force to ge[ this project accomplished. He stated he recognizes no one can predict [he future, but if the past is any indication, he felt this develop- ment would be one of the greatest in the State of Alinnesota. hff. Qureshi stated he appreciated the help of hh. Commers as he fe1[ he had contributed new ideas to move forward with the project. Mr. Commers thanked s[aff for all their time and determination in negotiating an agreement. A D.70UR;� MENT : PHJTIOr BY tIIt, RASMIJSSEN, SECOI�D£D BY M[t. MEYER TO AD,TOURN THE MEETING, PPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSOr COCAfERS AECL�RED THE AfOTIOr C�IRRIED UrANI*fOUSLY AA'D THE ,TULY L0, 1986, HOUSING & REpEVELOPP1EftT AllTHORITY PIEETII�G ADJOURNED AT 11:05 p.m. Respectfully s�bmitted, Carole Haddad Recording Secre[ary