PL 08/20/1986 - 6879City of Fric�e�
AGENDA
PI,ANNIIQG OJAMISS7f�N MEETING W�IFSIIT�Y, ADGUST 20, 1986 7:00 P. M.
i�ocation: Co�mcil Crianber (upper leael)
CATJ. q�p ORDER•
ROLL CAL�L:
APP�Q�/F' PLit4'Tju TS$TON NLNLTi`FS• AUGUSP 6. Z9BG
PAG FS
P[7BLIC HEARING: �NSIDERATION OF A SPEQAL USE,
PERMIT, SP Y86-11, BY ROGER Q.AFSGFNS: . . . . . . . . . . 1 - lE
Per Section 205.05.1, C, 1 of the Fridley�City
Code, to allaa a seoond accessocy building on Lot
6, Block 2, Rivecwood Manor, the same being 7130
Riverview Terraoe N.E.
DISQJSSION OF AI)DITIONAL 1986 CLBG FVbIIS . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - 2C
REVIEW OF' SP #85-16, BY MINNESOTA LIEPAR��IT OF
JBSAND 7'RAINIiJ� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3A
REUIEW OF SP #85-13, BY NOR`II3 FRF'.F3�7AY INVFSZORS ... .. ... 4- 4C
RECDIM'lENIY�TION OF �N�2A(�pRS FOR �3E S. 0. R T. SITE
AND Zi3E CUFBSIDE RECY(ZING A2CGRA� FROM �IE
FNVIItQ�N�V�`AL QUALITY O�MMPiISSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
RECEIVE �4PPF.AI.S mhB�IISSICXI tffNU'1FS OF JULY 29, 1986 ... ... 6- 6C
RE�IVE P1ll2KS & RDQ2EATION Q�MMISSION P'IIN[JTES
OF AUGUST 4, 1986 (See Motion on Page 5) . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7M
0'lHIIt BUSINFSS:
AII7GUIS1��7T
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANP�ING COP4HI55ION MEETING, At16U5T 6, 1986
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Billings called the August 6, 1986, Planning Cormission meeting to
order at 7:34 p.m.
ROLL CALL: .
Members Present: Steve Billings, Dean Saba, Dave Kondrick, Sue Sherek,
Dale Thompson (for Rich Svanda), Donald Betzold, A1 Gabel
Members Absent: None
Others Present: Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator
Jock Robertson, Community Development Director
Beverly Thurston, 100 Hartman Circle
Steve Shorma, 5916 Oakwood Manor
Tom & Halfride Manning, 1315 Hillcrest Dr.
Ed Kaspszak, 1317 Hillcrest Dr.
Paul & Roberta Tumms, 131D Hillcrest Dr.
6eorge Bacon, 1336 Hillcrest Dr.
Richard R Jeanne Lindquist, 1326 Hillcrest Dr.
Olga Palmer, 7329 6ardena Ave.
Gay & Spencer Minear, 1291 6ardena Ave.
Leo foco, 1345 Gardena Ave.
APPROVAL OF JULY 23, 7986, PLANNIPJG CO�iMIS5I0�J MINUTES:
MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO APPROVE TNE JOLY 23, 1986�
PLANNIIJG COMMZSSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHASRPERSOPJ BILLINGS DECLAP.ED TNE MOTZON
CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
l. PUE3LIC HFARI�dG: CONSIDERATIOPI OF A SPFCIAL USE PERMIT, SP_#95-10, BY
�� �,.���,..,_
Per Section 205.07.1, C, 2 of the Fridley City Code to allovt a day care
facility on Lots 2, 3, and 6, except the south 200 feet thereof, F1eloland
Gardens, all located in Section 24, T-30, R-24, Anoka County, Plinnesota,
and Lot 4, Pleloland Gardens, located in Section 24, T-30, R-24, Anoka County,
Minnesota, and Lot 5, except f.or the Westerly ll� feet of the Southerly
200 feet, Pteloland Gardens located in Section 24, T-30, R-24, Anoka County,
Minnesota, and Lot 1, except far the Southerly 210 feet, �leloland Gardens,
located in Section 24, T-30, R-24, Anoi:a County, Minnesota, and Lot 17,
Auditor's Subdivision Plo, 92, Anoka County, Plfnnesct.a, and Lot 33, Bl�ck
3, Moore Lake Hills, Anoka County, Minnesota, and Lot i and Auditors Sub-
division No. 92, Lat 17, may be encumbered by a recreationa7 lease runninq
in favor of the Gity of Fridiey.
PLANNIFIG COMPIISSIO�� FIEETIFIG, AUGUST 6, 1986, PAGE 2
MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MS. SHF.P,EK� TO WAZVE TXE FORh1AL RERDIP7G
OF TXE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE AND TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED TfiE PUBLIC
NERRING OPEN AT 7:35 P.M.
Mr. Robinson stated this property was located north of Gardena Ave. and just
east of 6ardena Lane, approx. 11 acres. Faith Academy was formerly Gardena
Elementary School. He stated the proposal was for a day care/latch key
facility for up to 40 children. As per city code in an R-1 district, a
special use permit was required for this type of use. The petitioner had
stated that quite a few of the children using the day care facility would be
brothers and sisters of children going to Faith Academy so there would be a
good deal of overlap in terms of the constituency.
Mr. Robinson stated Staff was recommending the following stipulations:
1. Petitioner to provide a plan for an additional 14 parking
stalls, to be blacktopped and curbed by Oct. 31, 19si6.
2. Petitioner to patch curb and stripe existing parkinc� lot
by Oct. 31, 1986,
3. Grassy areas to be maintained on a regular basis.
4. Petitioner to combine individual lots into one tax parcel
as requested by City Assessor prior to occupancy.
5. Building and rooms used to meet P1innesota Uniform Fire Codes
and Life Safety Code #101 regarding windows, smoke detection,
emergency lighting, sleeping area, and exits.
Mr. Robinson stated that in determining the parking, it was a littlP difficult
because school was not in session so there were very few cars in the parkina
lot durinq an inspection. However, on an aerial photo taken in April 1985,
it showed the parking lot overly full and that was why the City was requesting
additional parking stalls. He stated Gardena Ave, has no parkin9 on the north
between & a.m, and 6 p.m. �4onday - Friday, so that furtf�er frustrated the
parking situation.
Ms. Beverly Thurston stated if the special use permit was 9ranted, she would
be the director of the day care center. She stated she had discussed the
stipulations with their lawyer and they agree to the things that need to be
done. They are more than willing to do whatever is necessary to brinq the
day care facility up to code. They feel an additional day center is needed
in Fridley. They also feel, as stated by Mr. Robinson, that the majority of
the day care children will be brothers and sisters of child�,er; who are already
attending Faith Academy and the latch key ehildren will he ch�7dren already
attending Faith Academy.
PLANNING COMFtISSION P1EETING AUGUST 6 1986 PAGF 3
Mr. Saha asked what Ms. 7hurston intended to do about playground equipment.
Ms. Thurston stated the children will be outside some part of the day, and
there will be a need for more playground equipment. Right now they are
waiting for the special use permit before expending any money on playgrou�d
equipment.
rSr. Saba stated there was a swamp behind Faith Academy, and in talking to some
neighbors, he had been told that children from Faith Academy do go down there.
Ms. Thurston stated there was a stipulation of the State Licensina Canmittee
that day care children must be watched very carefully. She could not speak
for what goes on at the school at the present time, but she could speak for
the day care center. She stated she has been in day care for many years--at
The Learning Tree for many years and another day care center before that. She
could assure the Planning Cottmission members that no day care center children
would be allowed near the swamp. Also, the day care children would not be
outside at the same time as any of the school age children. That was also a
stipulation made by the Welfare Depi.
Mr, Saba asked if the piayground area would be fenced.
t•1s. Thurston stated the lJelfare Dept. would determine whether the area was
safe enough to leave the area unfenced. If they fee7 the area is not safe
enough, they will require that the play area be fenced.
Mr, Tom Manning, 1315 Hillcrest Drive, stated that quite a bit of the play-
ground equipment on the east end of the property was quite a way from the
school, and that neither the property nor the playground equipment has been
maintained, bJill the day care children be using that equipment that has not
been maintained and is located farther from the school? He would be concerned
for the safety of the children.
Ms. Thurston stated she had not looked at the existing playground equipment;
however, they will want playground equipment to be much closer to the school.
They would also not use playground equipment that was not safe. That woulci
not be allowed by the Welfare.
Ms. Thurston stated she also wanted to point out that while they are asking for
licensing for 40 children, that was actually for 20 preschool children and
20 latch key children. So, 40 children would not be outside on the playground
equipment at one time, Even if they were full, there would only be 20 day
care children. The latch key children would probably not be on the playground
as they will be ustr�g the gymnasium and another room in the buildinq most of
the time.
Mr. Manning stated Faiih Academy has not maintained the cutting of their grass,
even though the neighbors have called them several times. He stated he also
noticed 5-6 windows broken and a broken door: Those were also safety concerns.
PLANNIN6 COPIPIISSION MEETING, AUGUST 6, 1986 PAGF d
Ms. Jeanne Lindquist, 1326 Hillcrest Dr., stated that when the school was
Gardena Elementary, it was kept up nice. Now with Faith Academy usinq the
school, the ground are not taken care of. She stated she would not want to
live next to the school,
Mr. Steve Shorma, 5916 Oakwood Manor, stated the playground equipment on the
east end of the property was a hazard, A question he had was if a playqround
a rea was bui7t for the day care center, would it be accessible to other
children in the neiqhborhood after scfiool hours? There was not a lot of play-
ground equipment in this area for the children. If the playground was fenced
and not open to the nei9hborhood, some neighborhood child could get hurt
trying to get into it.
�1r. Shorma stated the back side of the building was uncontrolled, unwatched,
and vandalism does occur there. He stated that when buses are narked outside
the school, he once found some children playing in a bus because the bus door
was left open.
Ms. Thurston stated the playground area will be fenced only if they are required
to by the Welfare Dept. If it was not fenced, it could certainly be used by
the neighborhood children. If the playground area was fenced, she did not
know what I:ind of liability Faith Academy would have, if any, if a neighborhood
child got hurt. She would have to discuss with their attorneys.
Mr. Kondrick asked hir. Shorma if he vras suggestinc� that the existing playground
equipment that was substandard should be removed.
�1r. Shorma stated that a good portion of the equi�ment should be removed.
What equipment that was in fairly good shape was equipment that was there before
Fa;th Academy rnoved in--the merry-go-round and rocking horse. This playground
equipment was built as a school project and would probably he good for a back-
yard but between the children of the neighborhood using it plus Faith Acader�y
children, it was in disrepair.
Mr. Shorma stated that with regard to the poor maintenance of the grounds, it
did not do any good to contact Faith Academy as they have not done anything.
The area has been mor�ed twice this summer with a tractor and mower which laaves
the grass 3-4 inches tall and leaves gouges all over. He stated the neighbors
have fixed oRe basketball court themselves, because Faith would not repair it,
and three neighbors on the east end mow the grass there. He stated thP
neighbors are concerned as to whether Faith Academy was going to upgrade
things or continue to maintain things on a haphazard basis.
Mr. Robinson stated the City was aware of the poor maintenance of the lao-m,
but they were not aware of the unsafe playground equipment.
Mr. Ed Kaspszak, 7317 Hillcrest Ur., stated he would suggest that the special
use permit be authorized for a twa-year period subject to renewal. The
reason for that was this was a new application in a largely residential area,
and Faith Academy could come back in in a year and ask to extend the same
PLANNING C0�1MISSIOtJ MEETI�JG AUGUST 6 1986 PAfE 5
special use permit to 80 or more children, He had no problem with 40 children,
but he would have a problem with a lot more than that. The Commission should
make sure the provisions specifically provided for no more than 4� children
and that Faith Academy must reapply again in two years. If there were still
problems, that would give tF�e City an opportunity to correct those problems.
Mr. Kondrick asked .if there was any law that would prohibit Faith Academy
from havin9 more than 40 children.
Ms. Thurston stated their license will be for 20 preschool and 20 latch key
children. It was true that in the coming years or at any time, they could
increase that number; however, she couid assure the Commission and the neioh-
borhood that they would never increase the number by very much. For one
reason, the school was for grades K- 12, and there would not be room for
many more children. The only way she could foresee the number of day care
children being increased was if the school became so overcrowded that they
decided to split the grades into two buildings, one for elementary and one
for secondary. If that should ever happen in the future, then there mi9ht
be roon for additional day care and latch key children. At the present time,
there would not be. She stated she would have no objection to a stipulation
that limited them to 40 children.
Ms. Olga Palmer, 1329 Gardena Ave. stated another issue that should be brou�ht
up was the garbage. She stated she has personally called the City at least
3-4 times to see if they can get Faith Academy to get rid of their garbage.
She has also called Faith Academy. They have one small sized dumpster. They
put their garbage in plastic bags, and the qar6age is usually layinn all over
the ground. The dogs get into the garbage. She has lived in Fridley for 17
years, and this was the first year they have had trouble with raccoons.
According to the parY, naturalist, the reason was because of the qar6aqe in
the area. She believed Faith Academy should be required to have garbage
pick-up more than once a week. Sometimes the garbage was not even picked u�
once a week.
Ms. Palmer sta�e� there was broken glass around; the students at faith are
very careless and th�ow pop bottles. There are beer parties in the back
parking lot. She stated the area definitely raeeds more control.
Mr. Kaspszak stated these problems have existed s�nce Fa^th Academy moved
into the school. There are a lot of parties in the back and that was the
reason for broken windows and debris. The anly aray that can 6e solved is
through patrolling by the Police Dept. or the neighbors.
Ms. Paimer stated Faith Academy has not been a very good neighbor. They
have never given the neighborhood a very positive 4mage cf their school.
Once they even left a bus engine lyinq on the ground for about 4 mo. and
this was a hazard to the children. She had called the City and asked the
City to have Faith remove the bus engine. If Faith Academy is thai careless
and kindergarten children are allowed outside, what is going to happen with
the day care facility?
PLANNItdG COI�UdISSIOPJ MEETING, AUGUST 6, 1986 PAGE 6
Ms. Palmer stated the day care facility will bring added traffic into the
area, and they already have enouc�h traffic. There is not enough parkinq
as it is now. She stated the parking lot was usually filled, and people
park on the grassy areas.
Mr. Robinson stated maybe tf�e additional 14 parking spaces would not be
enough, inasmuch as they do not seem to have enough parking for the existing
facility. This would have to be resolved before the City Council meeting,
Ms. Sherek stated the City should request Faith Academy to provide them with
information on how many parking stalls they actually have based on dimensions
of the area at this time. It was difficult to say how much more parl:ing they
would need when they do not know how many parking spaces they are now usinq.
Ms, Palmer asked if the day care facility would be operated 12 mo/year or just
during the school year.
Ms. Thurston stated the day care facility would be operated 12 mo./year,
Ms. Sherek stated it might be helpful for a representative from Faith Academy
to attend the City Council meeting as well as Ms. Thurston who was representing
the day care facility.
Ms. Thurston stated she served on the Faith Academy Board of Directors and
would relate the concerns expressed by the neighbors.
Mr. George Bacon, 1336 Hillcrest Dr., stated he thounht there was an agreement
between School Dist. 14 and Faith Academy that the playground �•�ould be main-
tained and useable to the children in the local area.
MOTION BY MS. SHEREK� SECONDED BY MR. KOflDRICK� TO CIASE THE PUBLIC HF.ARING.
UPON A VOICE VOSE� ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRPERS07d BILLIPIGS DECLRRF,D TXE PUBLIC
HEARING CLOSED AT 8:20 P.M.
Ms. Sherek stated that in view of the fact that there was a swamp behincl the
school and the concerns expressed by the neiqhbors about the poor maintenance
of the property, she felt one of the stipulations that should be passed on to
the City Council was that the play area for the preschool chi7dren should be
fenced.
Mr. Kondrick stated he agreed with that. He a1sQ aqreed that the Planning
Commission should have some type of review (9 r�o. - 1 yr.) and they should
limit the day care facility to 40 children. He also thought they should
recommend to the City Council that the City start to enforce the existinq
codes that govern this prope�^ty ard the special use permit that Faith Academy
has at this time and g�t th9s property looking good a9ain.
Mr. Saba stated he had a problem with granting a special use permit for a
day care facility in light of the concerns expressed by the neighbors anri
the apparent violations of the existing special use permit. It was his feeling
PLA�dNIWG C0�1MI55ION MEETING, AUGUST 6, 1986 PAGE 7
that granting an additional special use permit v�hen conditions for the
existing special use permit were being vio7ated did not set a very qood
precedent and that proof should be shown by Faith Academy that they can live
up to the ordinances, be a good neighbor, and take care of some of the
problems before the issuance of a new special use permit. He also agreed
with the stipulations stated by staff and expressed by the Commissioners
about limiting the children to 40 and having some type of review.
Mr. Betzold stated he felt that if the Planning Cormnission were to
recorrnnend approval of the specia7 use permit, even though the code was to
be enforced, he felt some of the concerns expressed by the neighborMood
should also be added as stipulations: (1) garbage removal (2) safety factor
of the playground equipment (3) repair of broken windows and doors. If
they identify these as some of the conditions, then it gave them a basis for
renewal to make sure those things were corrected.
Pir. Saba stated he would like to see this special use permit request delaye�l
until faith Academy cleans up the existing violations. If the special use
permit for the day care faci7ity was qranted, then Faith Academy could post-
pone making those improvements. They have seen that happen with other
properties in the City. He thought granting special use permits to neonle
or businesses that have not been good neighbors in terms of upkeep of property
was a real problem.
Ms. Sherek stated she agreed with Mr. Saba. As a w�rking parent, she knew
there was a desperate need for day care in Fridley, especially latch key.
But, on the other hand, if faith Academy was not beinq a good neighbor now,
what made them think that with 40 more children Faith would be a better
neighbor?
�1r. Betzold stated he did not think there was anyone in the audience who
really opposed the day care center, and he did not think any of the Planninq
Cormiission members were opposing the day care center. The concern he had
was that if the City went ahead and issued a special use permit �ven for one
year, it might be very difficult and probably impossible for the City to
revoke the permit once the program was in and operating. He would rather
have the pro9ram not be9in and then possibly a year from now if Faith Academy
was still interested, they could reapply and if things seemed to be going
better and the nei9hbors were satisfied, then a special use permit could be
issued. If the Planning Commission recommended denial of the special use
permit, this sent a very strong signal to Faith Academy that there are changes
that have to be made if they want a special use permit for a day care facility.
Mr. Billings stated he also agreed with what Mr,Betzold had said. At this
point it was up ta Faith Academy to prove that they deserve a special use
permit for the day care facility. If the City was to qrant the special use
permit and review it in a year, 4t wouId tiren tae up to the City to prove
why Faith Academy should not have the special use permit.
PLANNING COPiHISSIOP! MEETING, AUGUST 6, 1986 PAGE 8
MOSIOfT BY 1�fR. KONDRZCK� SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL
DENIAL OF SPECIAL USF. PERMIT� SP N86-10� BY FAITH ACADEMY FOR TNF. FOLLOFIING
REASONS:
I. HERLTH RND SAFETY CONCERNS OF THE PROPERTY AND PLAYGROUND
. EQUIP:�fENT.
2. APPARENT LRCK OF CONCERN BY PETI270NER TO REMEDY TXESE POOR
CONDZTIONS. '
�7r. Thompson stated he a+as not sure that faith Academy had been aware of the
severity of their vio7ations of their special use permit or how unhappy the
neighborhood was, and he was a little uncomfortable voting against the special
use permit, especially before giving Faith Academy a chance to speak for
themselves. As far as the vandalism, he felt faith Academy was a victir� in
that case, and he felt the City had some resoonsibility in he7ping to patrol
the grounds and protect them from that vandalism.
UPON A VOZCE VOTE� BILLINGS, SABR� KONDRICK, SHEREK, BETZOLD� GABEL VOSING
AYE, THOAIPSON VOSINC NRY� CXAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THF. MOTION CARRIF.D.
Mr. Billings stated this would go to the City Counci7 on August 18.
2. COt�SIDERATIDN Of
issinr�s:
� OF THE FRIDLEV CITY CO
Mr, Robinson stated that at the last meeting, the Commission had requestPd
that language be ad:.'ed to Chapter 6 that would state that any commission's vice-
chairperson should sit on the Planning Commission when the chairperson couldn't atte
He stated that under 6.03.4. Membership of Planning Commission, the following
wording had been added: "E. At any meeting of the Planning Corrmiission, if any
commission member is unable to attend, the vice-chairperson of their member
comnission(s) may serve in their stead." He stated this would solve the
problem of the appropriateness of the vice-chairperson sitting in the chair-
person's seat at the Planning Commission. In the past, they have also had
commission members who were neither the chairperson or vice-chairperson hut
designated by the chairperson to attend the Planning Commission meetinq.
This new wording would restrict that. but this wording might be more appropriate.
MOTION BY MR, SABA� SECOIIDED BY MR. KONPRICK, TO RECOPfMEND TO CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF TXE REC6DIFICATION OF CHAPTER 6 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE,
COAIMZSSSONS. .
UPON A VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARF,D SHE MOTZON
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY,
3, CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING TAX INCREP',EflT DIS7RICT #7:
Mr. Robinson stated that as the Commissioners recalled, Winfield Developers
recently reQ�ested and received a special use permi± to place office/warehouse
in an industrial development, located on Lot 4, 5, 6, Block 1, Paco Industrial
Park. Part of the program called for tax increment financinq assistance
because of bad soil problems. This area was not presently in a tax increment
district.
PLAN��IP�G COFIMISSION F1EETING, AUGUST 6 7986 PAGE 9
MOTIOtI BY MR. KONDRZCK� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO APPROVE TXE ESTABLZSHMF.NT
OF TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT }17 AS OUTLINED BY STAFF.
UPON A VOZCE VOTF.� ALL VOTING AYE� CXAZRPERSON BZLLINGS DECLARED THE MOTIDN
CARRIED UNRNIMOUSLY.
4. C�NSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHIPIG TAX INCREt1ENT DISTRICT ¥S:
Mr. Robinson stated at this tiroe the Shorewood Inn vias contemplatinn exnansion
to their lounge and dining areas and improvements to parl:ing and landscaping.
In conjunction the Shorewood Inn has purchased about one acre of property just
to the east of the existing business, and the owner has asked the City for
assistance on the write-down. In order to assist, the City would like to
establish an economic development district for the restaurant so the City can
benefit from the improvements in terms of increased taxes from that proJect.
MOTION BY MR, KONDRZCK� SECONDED BY l9R. BESZOLD� TO RPPROVE THE ESTABLISHtdF.NT
OF TAX INCREMENT DZSTRICT N8 AS OUTLINED BY SSAFF.
UPON A VOTCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON BZLLINGS DECLARED THF. MOTIOP+
CARRZED UNANZMOUSLY.
5. DISCllS5I0W OF C019P4UNITY DEVEL�PME1dT COFif1I55I0P1:
Mr. Robinson stated that at the last meeting, the Commission had discussed
tfie fact that with the resignation of LeRoy Oquist, the Community Development
Commission was now down to three members, and that the Comnunity Development
Commission has been fairly inactive for about a year.
Mr. Robinson stated he had included in the agenda the Community Development
Commission "Purpose", the 1984 Corranission workplan, and minutes of the last
three meetings.
Mr. Robinson stated one thing that was important was a seven-member Planninq
Commission and the fact that the Community Development Commission has been
a valuable commission in the past. Perhans the Planning Commission members
could come up with some ideas for the comnission's future direction or some
ideas on how the Community Development Commission could help the Planning
Commission in terms of a study group.
Mr. Gabel stated the Community Deveiopment Commission has not met in about
five months. They now only have three members. He stated he felt if the
comnission had a better direction, it could be a good viable commission.
He stated he feTt there were things going on in the community that the
Eom�nunity Deve�opment Carriiss�on could 6e involved in. An example was the
redevelopinent of Commons Park. He stated t1r. Oquist had commented many times
that the Community Developfs�ent Commission always seemed ta get things after
they had already happened.
PLANNING COMNISSION MEETING AUGUST 6 1986 PAGE 10
Mr. Saba stated there were many instances when things come before the Plannina
Commission when neighborhoods are in the process of being dramatically changed
through development. Those were prime areas that could be looked at by the
Covanunity Development Commission--to look at the layout of the corrtnunity
and find out what development was going to be going into those neighborhoods,
The Community Development Comnission could come up with some preliminary
recommendations so that when a situation did arise, those recommendations
could be passed on to the Planning Commission and City Council.
P1r. Kondrick stated things just happen too fast, and there was actually no
time for a corrvnission like the Comnunity Development Commission to look into
these kinds of things.
Mr. Betzold stated another factor was that the community was about 90%
developed. In most of those areas, the developer can probably get a permit
to do what needs to be done without too much city involvement. Developers
do have to come before the commissions for special use permits, variances,
etc., and then the commissions become involved. The Corrmunity Development
Comnission, as important as it was,might add one more hurdle to a developer.
Mr. Kondrick agreed. He was not so sure the Comnunity Development Commission
was really necessary. In a way the Planning Cortenission was a"cormunity
deve7opment commission". How much more input could they really get from a
Community Development Correnission than they get from staff and some of the
other pertinent commissions? It was a point of fr�stration felt by F1r, Oquist,
and he a�reed with Mr, Oquist.
Mr. Robinson stated that when the Community Development Com�ission was
established, there were some long range qoals such as a biketaay/walkway plan,
a comprehensive plan, etc., but those things have been accomplished. �rdinance
review and allocation of CDBG funding are things which are currently reviewed
by the Community Development Commission,
Mr. Billings stated that instead of just looking at the negative aspect,
they should look at the positive aspect. 41hat areas could the Community
Development Commission be involved in that no one was doin� at this time?
Mr. Saba stated one thing the Commission had looked at in the past and
could probably look at again was contininuity of the neighborhoods--to see
if something could be done to increase the cohesiveness of the neighborhoods.
Mr. Betzold stated "community development" implied looking at the overall
community to see what needed developing. Maybe they didn't need a commission
to look at the overall community, but maybe they needed to take a more local
at things like neig�barhood improvements--to look at individual sections on
an ongaing basis--what can they be doing in conjunction with the other
corrrnissians like the Par�s � Recr��tion Commission or the Human Resources
Commissian and try to tie: in with those eanmSssions. It might be a way to
get more neighbors involved in the city processes.
PLANNING COMMISSIQN MEETING AUGUST 6 1986 PAGE 11
Mr. Robertson stated that Planning Corrrnissions were originally established
with emphasis more on the planning, the research and development, and then
as kind of adjunct, got responsibilities for some of the operations like
rezoning, special use permits, etc. One possibility was if the Planning
Co�nission could accept their role as sort of short-range operational-type
planning, primarily in the regulatory area, whereas the HRA is the operating
arm of the City as sort of the development corporation. The HRA has taxation
and spending powers the Planning Comnission doesn't have. Then, they could
look at the Community Development Cor�nission as the Planning Commission's
longer range research and development policy analysis, policy formulation arm
where the Planning Commission would route the types of operational decisions
that require short turn-around times. An example: certain specific neighbor-
hoods. General policy question: What about the townhouses and left-over land
parcels in single detached residential neighborhoods?
Mr. Billings stated it looked like the Community Development Comnission could
be a viable commission. He stated he had no problem with what Pir. Robertson
was suggesting that would help the Community Development Commission continue
to 6e a viable commission.
Mr, Robinson asked Mr. Gabel to go back to the Community Development Commission
and ask the reraaining commission members how they felt about what was discussed
at this Planning Commission meeting, and if they, in fact, wanted to continue
the commission.
Mr. Billings stated this item would be continued until they received fuCther
input from the Canmunity Development Cormission.
6. RECEIVE MOiION FR0�1 PARKS & RECREA7ION CDP41ISSION �1INUTES OF JULY 14, 1986:
Mr. Robinson stated that at the July 14th meeting, the Parks R Recreation
Commission had made a motion to urge the City to sell the triangular piece
of property on Creekpark Lane to Mr. Brickner.
Mr. Kondrick stated there was now some talk that the property should not be
sold but added to the property to the north of it makinc� another park across
the street from Creekridge Park,
Mr, Robinson stated he believed that on Aug. 4, the City Council had passed
a motion stating they would not be interested in expanding the park north
of the street. Then the idea came up that staff be directed to study the
selling of the land to the highest bidder. He stated that this was really a
moot issue at this time. The reason the motion was in the agenda was
because it was missed at the iast meeting. There was no action required by
the Planning Camrission.
PLANNItJG COhiMISSION MEETING AUGUST 6 1986 PAGE 12
7. RECEIVE JULY 10 1986, HOUSING & REDE�ELOPTIENT AUTH�RITY MINUTES:
MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO RF.CEIVE THE JULY 10� 1986 �
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MSNUTES.
UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8, RECEIIIE JULY 29, 1986, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES:
Minutes were not available at the meeting.
9. OTHER BUSIP�ESS:
a. Election of Vice-Chairperson
Chairperson Billings declared the nominations open for vice-chairperson.
�dr. Saba nominated Dave Kondrick for vice-chairperson.
Hear.ing no other nominations, Chairperson Billings declared the
nominations closed,
MOTION BY MR. SABR� SECONDED BY M5. SHEREK� TO CAST A UNRNSMOUS BALIAT
FOR DAVE KONDRICK AS VICE-CHAIRPERSOLJ OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION,
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CNAIRPERSO:J BILLINGS DECLARED TH£
MOSZON CARRIED UNANZMOUSLY,
ADJOURPdMENT:
MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO ADJOURN TNF. MEETING. [JPON A
VOICE VOTE� RLL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSOP7 BILLINGS DECLARED THE AUGUST 6� 2986�
PLANNZNG COMMISSZON MEETZNG ADJOURNED AT 10:05 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
�
Lynn Saba
Recording Secretary
�i�L'7 U
Q,�,��� . � �
�'� !�,-,�c`
3+e-✓t- s�or•+�-
�.�1 �hurs�'ah
�,�,,� � a„�,..�
y</ r.�� �Ia,��,�,� �`�
� f%4s��s �-/�
S'a� �� Ro6et-�a TUmr� s
GFo� �.E /V. �'v�co �
j6�: �,,�,.�, .� ��,.ti��,
�)�i'11,C.ciL�i��'� �_
l � �'b
�.La�
5416 O�►.I�w o• dl
(00 fyct t�irtq n
L . ►, q, },..,. i f
0 /qa. !"a �n, c,�`
ira� �iirlca r 1'5���• M:Nca.
�CE• I�o C�,
���ca�tr-�J
`ha,ti o r �rti d 4,r
� .r
�,"t�c.1� '�'�'.0�'t�
�3�s r��,��«�si �.
Fr,�l��
/ 3 /J' `^ � t r
! �r7 �r�l�q�s� �� k�. �
��s ia ��;�Icrest- Dr- N.k�, rr���ey
/ 3 3 6 i�-� �� c�s �D� �ie �t>�r ;�
o . �'
/3�{, �-{: 1��...,r �
13��1 �ardenG- ���,Ur Fx,.1/e.�.�'
/.L9/ :iara��no� �Irc. Frid�ey
�3�lS C,o�ea te�p f��,c N� f�'�o,ck�
C t't"�t � �lL;l��,
� ClT1! OF FRIDLEtl
8491 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E.
� FRIDIEY, MN 55452
i812Ib71-34b0
SPECtAL USE PERMIT SP � S(1 I j
SPECIAL USE PERPffT FEE �OC'.W RfJC£IPP # � �U
SQiE2x3LID PLANNING tDMN,ISSION 1�ETING II4TE:_���11 O $�o
9QIF�fJLID Cl'PY NU1�CII, MEE'TING IYeTE:
PROPERTY INFORMATION
pgppII{qy pD��g 7130 Riverview Terrace
Lk�AL DFS(RIPPION:
���
PRFSII�IT ZON7NG
BLOQt Z �2ACP/ADDITION Riverwood Manor
F�i�:e}_ • . - TST , -
SPECIAL DSE P£RMST BEING APPLIED �R: �_F�Ann q tn hni1R 9➢� x?2•
Combination garage-carport detached from house. Presently have
Garage under house not accessible for auto, tTsed for storage space.
SECfION OF RHE Q�DE:
* * * t ,� : r � * * t * ,r ,t � ,t • * ,t r ,r • � • • * * • � • • : • • * x : * � * +� �
OWNER INFORMATION
hp�.¢ Roqer G, Claesgens FHOt1E # 571-6816
ADIR£SS 7:
SIGNAIURE _
* ,r *,* * * * t r * • � * * * * * * r • * t * • * • ,r * * � *
PETITIONER INFORMATION
• • * * * * r * * •
NAl� Ro4er G Claesqens PHOiIE � 571-6816
•..• a.
��fei�ij:
: • * : * * x * : * * * ,t • * f • * x • ,c : * * * ,r * * * * • • * * : * * * * * � *
i; .^iij�l�'e�
QTY CiC[JNCIL:
SfIA3LAT7DNS:
li}t;ti. a�7
._... � a�
�.a� ���
i�� ���
IY�1TE
f�'?MY7�
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE TNE
PLANNING COMMISSION
Notice is hereby g�ven that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning
Commission of the City of Fridley in the City Hanithe CounciltChamber ate7u30
Northeast on Wednesday, August 20, 1986 +
p.m, for the purpose of:
Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP #86-11,
by Roger Claesgens, per Section 205.07.1, C, 1 of
the Fridley City Code, to allow a second accessory
building on Lot 6, Block 2, Riverwood idanor, the
same being 7130 Riverview Terra�e N.E.
Any and all persons desiring to 6e heard shall be given an opportunity at the
above stated time and place,
STEVE 6ILLINGS
CHAIRMAN
PLAt�NING COMMISSION
Publish: August 4, 1986
August 11, 1986
1�
SP N86-11
Roger Claesgens
7130 Riverview Terrace N.E.
Thomas 5wanson
184 - 71st Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Allen Rolland
188 - 71st Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Noward Crabtree
7100 Riverview Terrace N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Wtilliam May
7110 Riverview Terrace N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
�ouglas Hermanson
180 - 71st Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Larry Johnson
7120 Riverview Terrace N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Maynard Nielsen
7144 Riverview Terrace N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
John Bass
7132 Riverview Terrace N.E.
Fridley, �1N 55432
Conrad Rowe
7138 Riverview Terrace N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Roger Claesgens
7130 Riverview Terrace N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Trygve Olson
7145 Riverview Terrace N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Jon Dahl
7131 Riverview Terrace N.E.
Fridley, P1N 55432
Dennis Scheller
7121 Riverview Terrace N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Planning Au
Council
MAILING LIST
Pepito Albay
7105 Riverview Terrace N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
1B
t 1, 1986
�
V
�
`
�
`
�
�
�
"J
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
� CZBI II � � l .� � .. .. .
� � `• �2�1 _ ��� '8'i e` �; ;�1, j� ,
/ �� 2 Z3 ° . I ! . ,.
jzAa�, � � r�z :, s a<<: . z4 zs r� � z
<.,. `-:,-. . �Fj,' a�.z.. �44 . !30 � 116 1D0 � 8p '.
.r.�si"s ;7� :�i'�,�, ; '�, ��7_ . :�„- . � ..e
�ib2 � .. �i �s ... ,, �`�',��,'NR/KSE�; ",%
�.L )lS�/ r}„ , �' ��'J z ' �9) lz5 a • EN � �, -
, 'y ..9']� Gi = ALD �CIRC�p.
• � , (il , '�� ��+}� " w, t s� M .�� �
. , J A /n > ___ ' '" � e N 'y, x..:
ai Q r,r
I, � _,, ��s 9 Y � ?�000/�ON6 r_ �
�F� � 7�6?�B . o,. ��� 133 �' '��� h� ,. _
Ct .y � . l/i � �l , ti.
�'��v. 9� `/�N � ��_6',. '�` i 1 �_�,�lli�e
r•' ' � C�� w' - �o � � -�s--._ — .,. . I
� �� _.
- - U � ��c% � 3� �,�
a.,.:, .. Q ' " 's `
.�t�, ' `'� �9� r � . >.•.,.' � . --__ . . . �
. ' .:, _ ,. — W •3 , ��,' - r . � —�—�._
:-�r' `(s; ..-e,...' 29
���'Ri�ER�- ��� ��� � � RIVERWO D
,..
� WOOD ls'� ° : , ' �,`,.� � - o ,
J•)�SI �� 'S ��Y �i� . ,�• . � �
r "' W � ?9 SCHOOL
aa.i...
w..�
; �MANOR��� � 6 `�, .
, �, _o , ,.,z
::::::.; �`�: � .:;"':';� � -� �;� R E V ! S E D :, �i �
.;_: ,
:�;;:;::.;: .
:.�:: :.:�:.::: Q 2% ' �, � �;1;3�
• `�..' :. � �.�� ;� � I� �> i; ��
� � � (� � _ lc .`f �
D' + 1 u '! af� �BVI i Y B' •�•���_
' (�) 4 , QrR��� 'N �S R/ �R DO M NO �.�;;�` :
• .3 � � I 9 e `/O'� // � /1 � : � � ••
�3 - / ! /> � /6L��
N� TER ACE (f� Cz� �L'?„ ,�� �n� !u� �'� ^,�u� , ; ;�
r. n�f it e'�� B�. se. Bv. l ..
t ,�
___I � . �._ i
-, -'-----i �----� �,»-,�� F----�� ---7 -
6��a Ar iz���4 R��, r-=---1�---� �-- -��--__�-� �'
�' � _ � I —� �.`y`� R ,��"`'" I_ _ I I
� ,� __ � �
-- I �- � i - �C='> � .''i�--� !-_-�1_ _ � ;
�1
--� �-----j �- ,o - � "I I � � � �'� —� � , ✓ � .
---a ��� �/ T3���� �' x" __ � {Y�— �
—I �—� �-- —1 . °ra- ` I+1��- � 4
---� �T �-`=—; �—= _ --� �-----, � �---; � � ' , ���'� �
,r� r-- � `,
---� �-=- ; I-=--� r--�-=7-� r---�--�� � , ,.:.
_',`I�• .a , � ,:s,...,: ,
. i�–."��1�'—__� �--,--!j-_,,�,__1 �__� �
'�---� ----��-----� L--��-F?"---' `--- �<, 0 TH
" --- ,—,—•
— --! i `--_-�r----�' �---T—r—r---�-- ;
>
= --�-� r�--� �.---a � , i � . , �� �,�, ,. .� s
� M .
-�_ r � �=_ � �____� �� h � , �(S)�,� � > >(� .
---� F--=-7�-�-----'� � � ��� / ` � ,s�,� -
--�r1 !' . � � � �; %:� Y r •
-� �----� r---- � l,� T "•
J L_ i �� ��% K, ;� '✓, ,..°'� �� ��
� �_� � � �.��}______� �, l.�hf ^` !3 ..��� % .
�,�_� � � —'�_�' � n�_ __ y \ f \\ s •����• ���`�
��._ � �_ =.� k-�'� � � �� � � '°� a .
i.* � •
9 , i �
_ �-j _r—�_j�._.��.�_airc fr+� •p' Y
----`- , . ,' . ' � ..i'���
, ��--i r=.—.�_�--- V 1 '/
�
�i
�
�r
�L.
� 1 ♦
�. V
•' ic9 '�P`�*�E C j 1� � �: ,
�j ' �
F - Ji. '''e' �j��� if �
c
�� � +vEFs�P ' aAK, �►E , � 7 �
� ic 9 1
r 1
� � AD�:f,� �A�7�£�2� �
N r
,�� :P � C N€YtACq'E �t —_
,s _ � i
1
�• tl G Y � ! D I � � 1
1 �
o e � S ; �
� � N PA'nKWAY ; �
� E �
K �
M l� a z` t� u e �;- � Pe 1 ,
. i ; �
� �].f a � rr N .fs" i �„
q : � ,� �� q �
,�
3 8/ D � ; .
/ �� � �
' T_— �I �
• 2
I i � � � 1 ! � I
i' s � � R
� -- ; ° �c ' y. �
� ^ W a �� 1 J T� f .
> � J PivEHM � ,�
' I Z
/^w eM1 • • � I
�� j� F — i� i # _.
, ,i r . r � 1 Z' � '
,7167 'M• � ? , s r E� �% �}
� t A � a�v ,s I MI^K /� � ��W !'
,�Ai0N5 � . ' „ ` � � � ._�3 �'l� i,J
�I . i rEaa I ". ��'� �,,�Rqc
,� ` �� � � •�
77 '
; N�� �e � . � _
• :� :w,,, t'�; �
i ,; s� „ � �!,
� 3
� ° 1 � Qp� ��`''� _ �
� a �' �..�I , �.]
, i . s
/ Y '� ^, , ( .I
1 � .
�G�RL SCOUTS �� „ ., '= � � r ,,�
� .:� �'��c.t 4.'
. � � ° � ��
�AMP LOCKSLEA i ' ` s'r � �a -.� `� � �-✓
/ i �v � I '� � - "� .
+ � �. t �o � , a, trl � y n > .o�;. E:�
� �.
� 1 G'BiH. - 7 �� � �FI,7; _ '�. � � �
, , • � �a , s--_ z, Ra � P AZ � �
� � R e � - _ I . � ,
�\
s v ,o � i , �
� I �E ' , a: 5 . � � '
� i( 6 1
l r r 1 . . OF L . �' a''
_ i ���
� � � ` ` �' !' `
` , .
7 rKC�X. 4 ��f
i
f � ° 3 , ��7 OgrA I � � ' S � � � �
�� O ' � / —��,`' �N � ,r
. _.
. . �- ,� / � _
�1� � �' . � � � �� � i'�
l � Z' "13 Q ��— �
/`L+. , � 1 � ` ,���, � �
I ',�j !��. �. 'r'` .� �. .
�-::�" �� � `�"� ; r�, �w .I
..; ['%� r1'1 i, . �J •� � i aa w
.i � Z I � '�� _� �� �
�� ° �� r, � � ..-; �
A ., M£Q� '� � � �_ 3 ` �
..i ''i ! � ,J,,. 1 s z, ,
� iyi�N� . i � • ° ' �v j
4-•' � . . ,,-.;,
\ �z a iF
� .��P K�,,z c•* � �c r� < < :- , i ; .
; f'i � �O s � � •. e ' : '
. . `f..'� 1 'I ',M . l�� ! �
. . ._ e _ .._ � , '�-� ;,, _ ,r . 4
r. � � � " .,:� .
� � �� , , a 4� �... i
� •n �. �w l� � `��� �
r�.i � YVa�' t`•3 .
� � � � '�
� � � � ...ry� � . .+
l �Y �tl'"t^1�''J,'y{� .
: �
+ ¢ �. ' l y 'tn
��
n'1 • �.. �eP .. '.�� � :%'{ 3� & . �^`i
"� � "�, � v i
3 ^� �'` � � „�P . ��'.
z �.•�.� r �.
� '�� � ���L � .
� , � � ��r.�' �
� . � . � . . . �i�'e.1. _
a�. ��'�. i"' _ .
N �.
�
, �.
. � ::� _
�� .�.
�ssr!
i
a
t' �y
..., z .. .,..s . ��i ��.�:
, f;,. d,.�. �
. . ��,.��. -w.�
d ¢'.
� �fF*' ��Y d � �, . .
A � �a
d ? '� •�
� ,�:� � ° � � IE � ��
}.v. � �. '"
� ���. a�t�
k �.�
Y� � �s
�
kJt '
2:
�s: d �� �
-`a ^�?, ',��!`� �
.v=�-� � �
�: � ���,� ` .
A
� .;x . "� M. � �.
,,.,
f 4
- . e1 .
* } "�� �-,�'�s :::� F ��`�.'-� a� , ,
F 4 ��Y. .r,°..r. . � ,;
;�' �, ;�
. a� . � � . . . . .
� ,k ' a .. � - `+�i�
yb .� �
? # M
��
�a r �
= �w� :�. _
� ,� �,�-
� �, r
� � ^�
,�, ���` '
''�,���=_. ,:.. „
..p ¢ �
)T .,
w .V'
,.. _�.
.i; ",
�. ��
� � � ��°
� f
a q
�}......�... �
�t
'� � � l.:�ryi
\ �
a�K.. „
� d v � $
�' S"4'rr,�. � ,.
1 ��. r ��. �.
+Oµ� COLy�i
��`�'ME50�
COU NTY OF ANOKA
OJJite o/ the Counfy Board of Commissioners
COURTHOUSE ANOKA,MINNESOTA55303 612-421-4760
July 3 I, i 986
Mr. Jim Robinson
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, Minnesota 5543?
Re: I 986 CDBG B�dget
RestoraTion of Deferral of CDBG Funds
Dear Jim:
As a result of ihe enacTment of the Urgent Supplemental Appropriations Act, a
large part of the cut of I 996 CDgG funds has been restored. Your budget for
the 1936 CDBG Program has been increased by $18,544.00.
Please take this information to your City Council or Town 9oard for Their
action on use of the additional funding and noTify me of the resulis. I will then
take ihe appropriate action at ihe County, including public notice of the
community's intention. You are not required to conduci a public hearing.
Since one public notice for all of the participating communities is most
efficient, please submiT your proposed use of funds to my office by
September 12, i?86.
lf you have any questions, please feet free to contact me.
JO'�V:sw
Sincerely yours,
C�
oAnn O. Vdright
Community Development �✓�anager
Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer
r
�
2A
CITY OF FRIDLEY 19� COHMUNITY BLOCK GRANT FUNDItiG
1986 Funds Available . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E89,488.OD
1, Human Service Grants - 35.3� • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 31,5g8•00
p, Crime Prevention - Security Hardvare . . . . . . . . . . 15,500.00
3, Plaza Center/University Corridor Study . . . . . . . . . 10,000.00
17. Rivervieu Heights Park Development . . . . . . . . . . . 24,A00.00
5. Locke House Restoratior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,OD0.00
Total Estidated Project Cost ... 89,46&.CO
CDBC Pro�act Sumsary
Origloal PevlasC �Cmi�a[ering Er.viro�antal Uata
Pro�ect Iscr Pro�ect Mama Number �sount I�ouct �geacg Revler CoaClateC ot Campletion Co¢sentn
I { 1 I 1 I I
, COBG 1983 I Econa¢ic Dev, i I I I City of I I i UroD ProJac[ [o i
� I SWtly/Center City I 328 I 15,000 I -0- I Pridls� � N/� I I adtl adaitioml ,
I 1 I I { I I i Dro�ecta
1 ! ! I I I I I
j Traffic Study 1 I 1 I City af � I CompletsC I No GLange Sc
� Moore Lelce I 3Z9 ( 7�000 1 7.000 I Frldley � F/� I .lune 1986 I pro�ect
I I I I I I I I
� Draln�ge Scudy I i I I CSCy of � � � Drop pra�ect to ;
,I I North Araa I 329 i T,000 � -0- I Prldleq � Y/1 � i add a461ctonal 1
I I I I I I i I I Pro7ecca
I I I I I I I 1
� � Sanior SWdy I I i CSCJ of � � I DroD Pro,Ject to ;
I flollover Houaing I 330 I T�000 I -0- I Fridley I Y/l � I+ae acaic,o�wi
I i {' { I I i ; D�o}ec[s
1 I I I I I I I I
I 1 PuElic Facilitlee I 1 ! 1 City of I I Cocplecetl ; No chaz.ge in
I i Barrler Aemovel I 33� I 25,000 I 25,000 I PrShcey �- WA I Move¢Ear togy �➢�oJect
I I I I I I I 1 1
II I earrier Mamaval I I 1 1 Ciq of 1 I I ��op project to ,'
I I Loan Program I 337 I 50,000 I -0- I Pridley � N/� � I adtl aCtlitional
I I I I i I I I pro�ccca
II I I I I I I I I
� Com¢erc}gl P.ehaC. i I I I City of � I I Dro4 GroJec[ ta I
I I Loann-Aeaevelopmnt� 33Z i d7,683 I -0. 1 Prtdley I N/A I aAE aCtli[ianai
I i i I t I I I D+'o,7ects
I I I 1 I � I I
� � Numan Services/ I 1 I i City of I ! CoopleteA ; No c�an5e Sc
� ' PuElic Fun6lcg I 333 1 17,63� I t7�6j1 { Frldley I tlfA 1 Auguat 19�v I C��Seet
�I I I I 1 I I I
I I I I I I I I
� � Rivervie� HeigE[a I i I I CiC7 af � � Complete0 ; Nev pro,7ect
� � Acpuleion proJecC I I WA 1715,100 I Fridley I I SaCtemDer fy&t � atldetl
1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I
I I I I I I CSty of I I Co¢plecetl I
i I I � II53�570) I FriEley � � SepCemEer 1S� I(LEGCCN)
I I I I I I
I I Markeur.g Materlall I I I I I
1 for recevelopmenc ; 1 I i Ci[y o[ I I Cocyleted �; tiev prc�ect
I I Distrlc[ I i N/A I 17,SB3 i Frldley � F/A I ��e Iy6�+ I:dtled ,
I I I I I I I
I 2oTAL � i ;1T6,37Y 1776,310 , I t l �
I JoES Bill -'83� Moore LaYe E1Eerlyi
I
1 { I
I � No�[h AYea �
� � Urainage a Srail I
I I imDrvu:c Dro,7ect I
TCTAL
I Y9,564 I -0- i City ot I
I 1 Fritlley
1 1 1 1
� � � �
I I I City ot I
I N/l i L9�SQb I Pridley �
L9,564 I L9,56n
I I I I I I
� CDBG 19BL I Center City � i I
1 Imvrovements I L28 i109,000 110�,263 I
I I 1 1 I
I 1 Humav 5ervicea/ I I I I
I 1 Puellc Fanding I YY3 t 19�2t0 t 19�07T I
I I I 1 I
I Aaminlatration af I I I I
I I 312 Funda � I -0- t 1,5a0 I
I 1 I 1 1 1
I 70TI�I. , I 1128,210 1127�840 I
I CDBC 1985 I Center City � �.
1 LDrovecenta 1 528
I I I
I I I
I tlu�sn Servlces/ I
I euelic Funaing `.33 '�
I 1
I I Alverviev HeigEta I 53R
TOTAL ,
5/3�/17
11,500
T1.500
f9,S76 I 19,1T6
I
37.isa ; 3r,isa
I f127.&0 ;12T,B4o �
N/A
_—_
Pro�ect � 202 funElr.g �as ;
Cancelletl ; wc epproved
I
Co¢pleteG ; Ae� Drc.ject
SepCemDer 15� I aoCeC ,
— —� I
I �
I I I
City of I I LospleteU ; Un4er5rour,G '�.
Er101ey I dme 19�1981 � Septem0er 1965 1 Electrical�
� � ; Purc�a.e Police '
City at I I garage .
Fricley I Nf1 4 ; Ao eCacge Sn .
� prcject I
City af � � 6ev Gro]ect �
Fritlley i I i atltled
i I
I I I
City of i I
Friale� I Sme 7g, 1981 I
� �
I I
City ot � �
FriEley ' N/l '
I I
City af � 1
Prltlley � dVd I
I !
I !
� Untlergrour.a
I Electrlcal d
i CorrlCOr 5[udy,
� Police gzrzfie
� No enange SG
_� yro}ecc
I
I DwF Frolect
:
2�
,, , ,
CITY OE FRIDLEY PROPOSED 1986 COHMl1NITY DEVELOYMENT BLOCK
GAANT FUNDING: CITY COUNCIL APPROVED FEBRUAHY 3, 19�
1y86 Funds Available . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$89,ud8.00
t. Human Service Grants - 35.3i• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • � 31,588.Q0
2. Cri¢e Prevention - Security Hardxare. . . . . . . . . . . . 15,500.OD
3, Plaza Center Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78,000.00
a. Corridor Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .�10,000.00
b. UniversityfMississippi Lighted Signage. ... 8,000.00
4. Riverview Heights Park Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,40D.00
Total Estiwated Project Cost. .:89�488.Q0
� PLANNING DIVIS[ON �
_ MEMORANDUM
GTYOF
FRIDLEY
l�KJ 7D: Jis Aob�ineon, Plaming doordirator
!� FA(!1: Datyl Dbrey, Pla�+ing 1l6Qiet'mk �
D�?p II�TE; Aug�et 14, 196�
R�: 1!1 Dept. a�f Jobe and 1Yaining, &P ��.5-16
� February 3, 1986, City Wtaicil granted a special use permit to Minnesota
De�rtrnent of Jobs and Training at 7270 Caimerce Circle East, t.o alla,r offices
not associated with a principal use� with the following stipulations:
1. S�ecial use permit is foz M,innesota Depaztaent of 3obs and Training only.
2. P10 further affice tenants will be allowed unless a corresponding drop in
�acking deu�and occurs fran other tenant changes, with the exception of the
current 2,000 square feet of va�nt office �ace whic#i may be wnsidered for a
special uge pecmit.
3. Bring directional sic�age into code wmpliance; work with City staff in
developing an overall sic� plan.
4, S�ecial use permit to be revia�red by Planning Comnission in August 1986.
�e stipulations have Yxisiwlly been met, except that an improved wall sign
needs to be put into place by Minnesota Department of Jobs and Training.
Staff is working with then on this stipulation.
�
�2300� � � j`Zl � � r � � ���(
� OSO} , 1 � Ii
, .
SP �85-1� 2 ° (800) t � "$
MN Dept, of � d Trainin 7;� ,'6 I � �
z+s :s�
Y ��
?]3�
(i000) (eeo) � � r
�Q 1
-- ;:;'T--� z° � �� . '�,, +; i 73Y�
7321 7320�� !� �
O : • • ��
z3oo) —az"°��� ' rr I �s � _
� N i r.� . P :' �550� z �
� 7300-O�-I6-2� �9so� �pp�+ ,.x.: � , av�
,9 ,B ; ` � 3 "'--� . ��
7301 �7310� „ _...7300 .,:� :-.T S'4f.
.:� fe M.Y '!, rr ' �'L+ iN •••� .. I '.
Y
.. , , . .
�
'
t' •
— _ --- s_73RD- �4VE. �NE� � ; � _ _ _ I _� , �
. .,,� ..�... °' . z
� � � � •��������� �i • •�1 • 4���i, •�.i. `�� i
r
••������• •������� � � f" I
o � . 00 W ' �: 73
i � ♦ S ���1���� •�f���} ~ ^t i
!l ��9� • • • • • • • •r r / . a :
� . . . . . . . . ; • t� ` �zia
�•'•'•'•'• '••'�..,` -- ' � ,
N ... . ... . ,,;,.- F,
W bNVI! •��•• /A�YA�• •� �I Y � W I, r
• • • • • • • • • `
�Z9r •.•.•7z�a•.'•�. ' : .
........• � �
. . . ... ..� h Y �r � Z
�3p d '.'.'.'l�.'.'.'.r . � � ' Z
.......... > .
� .'.'.'.'.'.'.•.'. .w :
; ' , e �. a. ,
� W �.�.�.�.�. . .�.� J � ----- ..,«i-.,.,�
�z �ti J . � _.��722t a ;
O � ��� � C� s � V
' I:
G ��
� � 6 � l� :
� ` f
� ,, .e.;��, � ...�, W ?/ 4 ► � , , z '� �
CC .,, c.� � : � ��` �'� a�
� W � � \ � , F►t���J
� W �., ,
� �eo � � � , ,, ,„;o�,
' � p .� i � p � ` �,
4 v � � 7�7� :
'� I -- ✓ ., t� ,'' s p�t i I;
; �`�• �t��.�1- 1l-22 2�r- 71 + ",� ,� � � la. ,r
• _�
I -. , � �.' .r,, Q ---- � -
:� ..
; ^'� 'COMMERCE GlRCLE sS f � ^
�1 ` ` �ap � , �`' I,�
j •� �� �,` �,so ���'``�. ' �rr� �
it . , � 6 .
` I
I � , , ; , ;.
�i __► � � '
I J_� _f�—_ ____ �_ �' 1_ '
. _ _ � _ _ � 1 ' �,BM TrLf . G iifa� � _ �' y j '� ' �1
— 1 ,,
I t �., ,4.... ....4 - �.c.0 - � •; ° -. - , - � - {
L . � 1 �_. 1 � .: "
— - -- -- — —_ _. _ � - .
T—_ -- r-�-Y �
. . �� ef ,.�� - .—. _ J!!t'JNS _ . - t
__ , fi�,_
� 3:
. _.
� � �OCa�io�v�
,
�
�
�
� PLANNIMG DIVISION
� MEMORANDUtVi
CITYOF
FRIDLEY
!g?!� �: Jim Pobinson, Plaming Qoordinator —
l�7�D PS�S: Daryl l�rey, Plaming Assistart'E ,
lg7� IIA�: Atagust 14, 1986
RHGARDII�IG: Fast Rivel Pnad Busiiless Oente[, SR #85-13
On Febcuacy 3, 1986, City Council granted a special use permit to North
Freeway Investors for the East River Road Business Center, to allaa offices
not associated with a princig3l use, with t]�e following stipulations:
1. City will m�nitor future tenant occupancy and corresponding parking de�nand;
limits on offioe use may be i�osed if parking problans becane apparent.
2. Special use permit to be reviewed August 1986.
3, S�ecial use permit applies to all four buildings
Attached is a table that gives the curtent occupancy information and the
related �rking demand. �e special use permit is for all four buildings.
t+r86-197
P i� :; i O� �=. .' ,` r','o+ �. �
� /
, ort e � tor � — � ,. � !
• � �•f" r . , u
, '���' � i:'+ � • :.
, ; > > • � o� .
.• � � -
�N ��_ .� :� � ,
. :.
•
� f • *
. ,f� � �, � � � t
>�.. � , r, � .,� .
. � �' � ' . e . � . �
I � �� �i , ' � . � � �
� `� � �/ `, , � ��/ �/ .
i ��T~ + � I , � � ,i, • �J' ,`,• � ��V /I1f� ' �� '!I
� M��
/ � / i , � ' v� � ++e , • r w ' �
�-� J ;'� r= .�'" � ;' r . , �
� , ; t < e '` �P ��.
t � ,' % ��t • • :. • ' : r ,,�� �'•_
� ,. . � •.rf.
/ It S3 ` • . � r `
'•, �� �' ' N ,�+, . � ♦
, .
/�� ��� j�}4'�� .��io' i , % `�+ � '
y • . �i „r� �,�,� �� � � ,. �:�,��,�;�: �' CEN
� � . . , a� � J ,: �,,,, � ; � • �
�!, c�1 e1i. w�'� „°�'� - t. f jo! ,
`' � , .
` � �. � � `'y Tl�°,e- —'!
'4y _ � _
/� r
f' ' % N =1 ' .
i _ �
Y � •y
GREAl ':"- �•�+, y
� � �,.
�s+ -.
: �" -�� .� 2 � I � No rHER
,� ± � . ��
, ,
: i � o �
' % ' y, °�coT L . o C 4, ; j `.�v �
, � v �
, � , � 5 I Q�
. , ;
, t . _ �oT
!— t
� � ��� QUT�OT AA pUTLC7 �B
S " '�• •^ � � '
' �••. ..
__� ^ ' ' t rr ` � rw
�\ I� � t�s w.� ii�N ii�
T� �-'�� �U7lOT r` ��• i�n.'n'� .� �
1�,� . . ,! � O��LOT J ••.�,. ...r:::.�- 52ND, WAY ;:
� �� ���N ,. �
•1 y _. . I� ••l� .
;� 1 .... ...
. ....K•, l:'s�..� - . ��x"' � �
Y- r� ' R•
' TRl�4L �
� � , �: !ND � ,
�,: a ,���T��T . /D
..•,.•..- �
i ' � �i . i. .. �
., f 0 f ., �
I ` �, J � ' � • J �� 1
� � ` �
o �
� �. w'��'.i ♦ r a i ii o• i. r. •.��'w'i ♦..
.i .r . .r r .s .. • r � 's 4. - ..•. . � � .i
••..•� .y-.�`'' • � Q .
w:'.'�'�r OUTLOT ►� � �^��
• , �
' . r 5 � + , � � ll
, �� 4, � , 2. , �; �
3 � � � _ •1
z: �° 0 5 � 0 �,c
/:� �r :; .r.
• � OUTLO' V �
.� , .:,:� ._ r. .-.�:: �� ;:� � ; - = '. -�ATION MAP
i . � � � � ..• �
TI ,.... .. .. �
- - - - - - -` ... ._. s•t- : � a.T ..,�,.
� ,,; �t . _ :.
i ��, �q/) ��. "..?� A � +'l�g� ' . �,•' (+� j
l •` ' ' ,�i / / ;o^ . ''T� �: _ .r'� .�' y ,,.
\ . '� "'`/S f' ^ h .�ye �� �0.
• . �ti . '/ i � ` 6 �� ' . I
.. �. J
' `rr"<� � i� � d � .v ,�� I
„ > r� � _ ,' � . � �
� / b �'ti � 1 �y.a � 2
�- � °d i ^i JM .�,' `' ;;''� - �'1 ' I
�\ �f Q �' � / � � ��� , ;lf i. ..j�(a� �
i�( i ' J f `. '� ` t �i .
o , , �., � 1 ���:� ��°�� DUS /,QL '
� � ; ,, ,,>,>• ,:,',
, Q' i � ` ' ^' : . .�� : : •' .
Clo• , � � %' " �: b
�. � � � ; •�� ,:• •���..
, ;; , e
,
, i � },; i � � .. .P
��, �� �f i � ,�, �� � ��\
� � �N � � � � � �
. � l�/ , J �~ ��� c � eo , r �(s V' l • : \�0�. ` I�
� � �s�. � � � _ =c � . � ` � �10, 2
� �qa ,..,. : ai �`�� `p . �' , • /1/� I
/ �7 .. (7) � i� � ,° S3�T0 / � . , •P� '�� VL N�
E � �'
� � % i [ ,y a� ,%� �/` �s 23,`.` ,.� a a� �� 'ti
�I`,�/ �.
I h J . - - !rt' 'i• , !. P
� � � / �� \�'. �" r, . °� ' . I
r / � • -c 2. �. `'.
• --1F r'-- � . _. s !n� .,ma �.. - . �� r
, ; , y 2 a =; � � ��---- _ _ _ .
,�;�,
� , �, -
'° � ' ; � i(9i,' : : �„) " - OUTLOT DD
� �� �� � �r>� .__
�
' �' � ; ° NO THE rrnr
, � , „ 26 2 �. :'
; % � ,;: - � � � ,+
l i i 0 T� J 8 � G'7�� t� r Q .
r' ' . —+i pT � o � V� �; �, ✓
� !�) : �,' �� 3 1
Q / ' � • � � D � v 1 � ( A 1
'! � i � � � i ` 2 �� � (iel ��COT ��: � i:
�.� / O:e K A.1
�/ �_ � _— ��• � , a OUTLOT BB
T _' ' � , ,' , \
� �� ��� � � \ � � i
i_� ; ,r, ur�or M � ,�� ., ,>r�, , —__-
7 -� �,� . ` � � our : ��D � 52ND, WAY '
�_ '�; . s.,.,„E oer JB . 1.,a,• .,., .. �— ., --
�lir� n fOrl
� \�I • � 1 .f)f.iJ _ � �..
a�l � �_ .- � �
_ '.� � D i � ��GUTLOT Z /O
j v,- �
, �� � ; ; - � � 4 ' �,,,� � � . re . '
, . F .
..:�a- -: ; o ;;�a'Y o 3 c � z .
, ^ � I
- F I
�� � � �� �
i' I ° e":: .-� . N �' _ ��. ..' .�< _—�_
- �OD Ul� °""k T � :'>'fi��� OUTLOT LL '�-
.i ., �n-ee i ., i J�e � .. ... . .
e, i � "
,.: % O F�OT P
� " � CEN T�'
: 4 y B 5 � N;
-',- - ; �: ' / � '
' � yo� ; p;�, e �
/ J .Z� 3 _ ��I� 2
F �1 ) .
0 7 .i
3� ,,. �, o .�.a1 ZnirTEnT v '
� �'�" • •- ' EAST RiVER ROAD
, �
.� : ,.�..
" , OUTLOT ' I ?:; ; , "-; i,�
; ''�''' '`' BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION
95000 SQ FT EACH
_ _ __ __. _ .
L L L M++ious Gnt�r LM�SK +b ��'�1°s I°t°MLlou
Teoant rw Suit� Olf3w YB9L Ca�. Sotal N0. F�rk �W. Parlc
3p [L SO Pt E9 tt 84 ft �ISn""""" Y�?"'
BOILDIIq �8: 5301 8642 8I9L8 70LU
111atste Imwwc�'/� �16 I,IdI 1�1l4 5
��Crs'^y� •�� Oftitt 716 1�7X+ 1�756 � A
laerican StavOnrE - Tr�m 105 20,17� d.619 28,6�3 �1
Conmercl�l Syate�a CorD• >>b 2,72: 49b Z�920 9
108 0,6t5 Y,022 6,637 iB �
Exp�r[el Ioc. �p� �j0 163
Y. K G CorD. 110 !0, OSU �
[nucaan Comtruction 101 1,l9� 500 5.3� 20 �
Aaccra ExcEaaQe Yew. 103 g30 2�190 3�020 3
Rottlund Ce. toT 2.T90 393 3•�� �S �
Z a Diatributloa 109 Z.�zi 1.9� 3'�' a
Yacaat ��2 ��z00
vaconc �Ob 3'3;0
"'"""'"'_"'
'"""'""'""'_�'��"�"_"—__..""""�"�"""
nri.1L3 81�2�8 15.929 /01,4oT )25 T
• Sotal Parking Pro�lded [or Buildio{ 1- 3b7 St113a
• Sotal Neyuired parking for 1�ueA ap�a� - 33z SCalle
• iotal Vacant Sp�c� - A�530 3V. P�.
eoL.DI110 1YO: 5255 �t �� �
Nome Int��lors �uC 61fte 203• 2.5� ���p 3'T�5
1/2 202
Nortpern tlyCraullca 20T-270 ���8 9,�92 �3�%6�
Paul's Purnitwe 205-2W S.Z�T �2�ZA3 ��'�9�
Paant 201 1,2�0
Yacant 202 1.955
Yacant 20a 3r220
Leeaing Otfics 211 2960 770 -_-'______ 3=6T0__-
. ""'""'""'""'"""'"�"'�"
iOTLLS 2,5�i f0,435 ��.735 �7.bb
• Toc�l P�'kit� Pro�1UW for HulldSna 2- 22b 9CSlls
• Total Psquiretl D�rkin{ tor lauM eyacs - 175 3c�lls
• Sotal Yacant Spac� - 9,115 aV• «•
HOILDIMG SY16: 5201 813f �Iti! �01D
ProyoaaA Parkln� - 70f Utfice 35,0�0 0y PC 1�0 St�1�s
15f M+nufactwiog 7�500 Sp Pt 19 stalls
15S �o�ercial 7�500 Sp Pt t Stall�
_' _'"""'"""""_""""_"
""""""
iottin 50,006 9p ►t 163 3C�11n
• Sotal Parkicg PrmidM tor Bu11d1ns 3-�72 stQls
eO➢.➢IR tWA: 5155 �T �� ���
Proyoe�E P�rl[Sng ' 1� ���eturing 10�500 9p TL '2T St�lla
75f �e•rsnou.e 10�500 9p 7t 6 Stalls
"'�_'""'""""""""""_'���_----_—�_
'/0,000 90 PT 229 gtalla
� Sotal Paricicg Provldrd tur Buf]Oius 4' 249 St�lls
Yq, htk
Co�.
11 �
2 63
3 �
� __"'"".""'
"'"'""""'t Y5
23 �
4C
�
CITY OF FRIDLEY
APPEALS CONMISSIO�� MEETItIG, JULY 29, 1986
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Betzold called the July 29, 1986, Appeals Commission meeting to order
at 7:3� p.m,
ROLL CALI:
Menbers Present
Menbers Absent
�onald ftetzold, Alex Barna, Jerry Sherek
Diane Sava4e
Otfiers Present: Darrel Clark, City of Fridley
Hr. & Mrs. Ray Cramble, 7340 Ptemory Lane �I.E.
Randy Bricl:nan, Covenant Construction Co., 7716 - 67th Ave. fJ.
Jerry Ratcliff, 733Q Nemory Lane PI.E.
APPROVAL OF JULY 15, 1986, APPEALS C01111ISSI()N MIt�UTES:
F10TZON BY P1R. BARVA� SECO7JDED BY N,R. SNEREK, TO APPROVE THE J[ILY IS� 1986�
APPETiLS COF1lSISSIGN MINUTES AS WRITTEN.
UPON A VOICE VOSE� RL L VOTING AYF.� CHAZRPERS011 BETZOLP DECLARF.P THF. MOTZOtI
CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
1. CO!JSIDERATIO�� GF VARIAI�CE
IEST, VAR k86-21, 6Y COVEP�A"1T C(1�i5TRIICTIOPI
MO^'ZON BY MR. BARIJA� SECO!JDED BY AtR. SHERF.K, TO OPE!J THE Pf'BLZC NF,APT!1G.
UPO.V A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIC7G AYF., CHAZRPEA.SOIJ BETZOLD DECLARF.D TNE Pl�BI.ZC
NEARING OPEN AT 7;31 p,M.
Chairperson Be*zo7d read the Adr�inistrative Staff Report:
�DI�YTJISTRRTINE STAFF P,EPORT
7340 T4emory Lane
VAR �86-21
A, PUDLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREFIENT:
Section 205.07.3,D,2a requires a side yard of not less than ten (10)
feet. -
6P,
APPEALS COIIPIISSION MEETING, JULY 29, 19Rfi PA,F 2
Puhlic purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a minimum of
20 feet between livin9 areas in adjacent structures and 15 feet between
garages and living areas in adjacent structures to reduce exposure to
conflagration of fire. It is also to allo�� for aesthetically pleasinq
open areas around residential structures.
B. STATED HAP,DSHIP:
"We want a new addition because the size of fanily has grown with a new
baby. lJe would rather add on than move, and we want to invest our extra
financial resmurces in our home."
"We need to expand kitchen and clinin9 rooM area - they are located on the
northlaest side of the house. lJe need more cahinet space in the Y,itchen
to include a dishwasher and laundry facilities."
"iJa cannot move the new wall two feet farther to the south because the
roof lines would not match, the ��hole elPCtrical access would havP to be
moved, ar,d the addition would come into the middle of the �+indow."
C,. AD�fIf�IS7RATIVE STAFF REVIFW:
The petitioner would like to add 12 feet onto the rear of their existing
structure, They then would convert the existing 10 foot screen porch
toc�ether with the 12 foot addition into a 22 x 36 foot living space.
The house adjacent to the petitioner's is 17.5 fePt away from this proposed
structure.
If the Board approves this request, the staff has no stioulations to
recommend.
Mr. Clark showed the Corimissioners the floor plan, elevation, and structural
information, f�e stated the conversion of the existing screened-in porch would
be about 7 ft. from the existing property line at the closest point. The
farther back the addition went, the farther a�iay from the prcperty line it would
be. �tost of the addition would take place behind the neinhbcr's house.
Mr. Ray Crambie state� their p7ans are to have more living area because of
the increase in fa�ily size.
Mrs. Ray Crar�bie stated the main reason for the aiay the addition was being
proposed was for aesthetic reasons--to keep the house in line with the existinq
garage, rather than jogging over 2 ft. The jog would not be very attractive
aesthetically and could aiso affect their property value. Also, the v�hole
electrical access would have to be moved and it would interfere with an
existing window if the addition were moved over 2 ft,
6E
APPEALS C0�41ISSI0�� 11EETIN6, JULY 29, 1986 P�Gf 3
Mr, Jerry Ratcliffe stated he was the adjoining neighbor at 7330 Memory Lane.
He stated he was concerned that the new living space would be next to his
be�irooms and just the fact that the living space would be closer. He had no
problen with the Crambles, but he would be concerned about future neighbors
who might not be as nice as the Crambles.
Mr. Drickman, Covenant Construction, stated it was their intention tn keep
a minimura of 20 ft.�.between the addition and the neighbor's house. At the
closest point where the new living area begins, it would be 17.5 ft., and
then it angled out to r�aintain that 20 ft.
Ftr. Ratcliffe stated he did not object to this variance, but was just voicin�
his opinions.
FlOS"ZOfl BY MR. BAP.NA� SECOIIDED BY MR. SHEREK, TO CLOSE THE PUALIC XSARI!JG.
UPON A VOZCE VO2E, ALL VOTING AYE� CNAIRPERSOt� BE_TZOLD DECLRREP TNF. PDALIC
HEARING CLOSED AT 8:00 P.M.
Mr. Barna stated he had no objection to the variance. The hardship was well
defined in the need for expansion 6ecause nf the increase in family size.
The addition seemed well thought out, and it made sense to follow the exist-
inq building line. He thought the intent of the code Y�as being met anci
maintained.
Mr, Sherek stated he had no objection to the variance.
F1r. Betzold stated that because of the curvature of the lot line, most of the
proposed addition will be close to beinq within the code. The petitioner was
Planning on adding on to the existing structure and follov�ing the existinq
lines which seemed to make sense. He had no objection to granting the variance.
MOTIO:! BY MR. BARNA, SECOtiDED BY MR. .SHF.REK� TO RPPROVE VARZA9CE REQUEST,
VAR l786-21, BY COVEtlA:4'S C0.'1STRUCTIOtt COt?PAPlY, PURSUA:�T TO CNAP.TEP. 205.07.3, D, 2a
OF THE FRIDLEY CZTY CODE TO REDC7CE THE SIDE Y�7RD SETBACK FRO."�! TEIJ FEET TO
SEVEN FEET TO ALLOW THE CO;iSTRUCTION OF ADDITI06'AL LIVZNG SPACE BENZ1lD TN.F.
EXZSTIt:G G.�P.AGE O:d LOT 9, BZACK 2� blEZADY MAI:OR SEC0.7D ADDZTZO.'1, TNE ShME
BEING 734D HE3.'ORY LRYE� FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55932� 477TX TNE FOLIAf'I!TG
STZPUL,§ TSD.`� S :
1. THEP,E BE tr'D 7JINTXIl:'S C14' TNT NORTX WFLL
2. TNE WALL BETWEEN THE LZS'ING SPRCE A1:D GARAGE BE A FIRE—RATED
WALL,
UPON A VOICE VOTE, RLL VOTZNG AYE, CHAZRPERSOP: BETZOLD DECLARED THF. M,OTIOP7
CARRIED CINRNZMOUSLY.
APPEALS LOt41I55I0�1 HEETING, JULY 29, 1986 PAGE 4
ADJOURIIHENT•
MOTION BY MR. SXEREK, SECOfIDED BY MR. BARNA, TO RDJGURI7 THE MEETIPTG. UPON R
YOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAZRPF.RSON BETZOLD DECLARED :iiE JULY 29� 1986�
appea2s comnission �reeting adjourned at 8:04 P,M.
Respectfully submitted,
c ,. .
yll p� Sd d
Recording Secretary
6C
7
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PARKS L RECREATION C(NAIISSION
19EET I WG
AUGUST 4, 1986
CALL TO ORDER:
Lhairperson Kondrick called the August 4, 1986, Parks & Recreation Cormission
meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Menbers Present: Dave KondricY., Ftary Schreiner, Dick Younq, Dan Al1en,
John Gargaro
Menbers Absent: None
Otliers Present: Jack Kirk, Recreation Supervisor
Cfiarles Boudreau, Parks 8 Recreation Director
Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator
Ralpfi Uolkman, Public Works Haintenance Supervisor
(See attached list)
APPROVAL OF JULY 14. 1986. PARKS & REf.REATI�N COHPIISSIOP� �tI��UTES:
.MO^ZOfJ BY MR. YOUNG, SECONDED BY MR, GARGARO, TO APPROVE THE JULY 14, 1986, PARKS &
RECREATION CO�M1fMZSSZON AfINUTES AS WRITTEN.
UPOV A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTII7G AYE� CHAZRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED TXE MOSION
CARRIED UNANZMOUSLY.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
MOTZON BY M2. GARGARO� SECONDED BY MR. YOUNG� TO ADD THE FOLIAWZNC ITEF!S TO
THE RGENDA: VFW LETTER - ITEM b UNDER NEW BUSI"TE55
TRIANGULAH PZECE OF PROPERTY AT CREEKRIDGE PARK - ITEM a UNDER
OLD BUSINESS
ALSO, TO CHANGE THE FORMAT OF THE AGENDA SO THAT ITEM 2.a, COMMONS PARK -
P17BLIC INFORIMATZONAL HEETINC BECOh�dES ITEM 2.
UPON A VDZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON KfXV.nRFCK DECLARED THE MOTZON
CARRIED U*7ANZMOUSLY,
1. CO�iMONS PARK - PUBLIC INfORMATIONkL MEETIt�;
Mr, Robinson stated he wauld iike to alleviate some of the misconceptions
the citizens might have heard concerning Commons Park. He stated they were
not going to be talking about any development other than the redevelonment
necessary to improve the park. -
7A
PA�KS Y RECR[ATION C0�41ISSION �1EETI��G, AUGUST 4, 1986 PAGE 2
Mr, Robinson stated that in the past, Comnons Park was a very high active use
park. There were four softball fields, also soccer and football. This usaqe
was really too much for the park and the neighborhood and was an overburdenina
of the facility. In the late 7970's/early 1980's, the City started on the
planning, acquisition, and development of what is now tfie Coemunity Park, rrhich
is 40 acres. With the transferring of programs from Corrmons to the Coer.iunity
Park, there has been a lot less use of Cormons Park.
Mr, Robinson stated they are talking about improvements to Cormons Park which
were passive in nature. They have no intention of ever going back to a high
activity use in the park.
Ftr. Robinson stated Comnons Park actually serves the area bordered hy Hissi-
ssippi on the north, University Ave. on the west, Highway 65 on the east, and
53rd Ava, on the south--approximately 4,500 peoole. Commons Park �vas rPally
more than a neighborhood park due to its size (23 acres) and its location
(centrally located) and the fact that it has a lot of existinq ar.ienities. It
was really a conmunity based passive park. So, the City's proposed imorove-
ments are centered around the iJea of developing the park for passive use for
both the neighborhood and the community.
*1r. Robinson stated the firs t thing City Staff looked at was the fact that it
was close to Villa9e Green elderly co�plex (approx. 100 units), the Villaae
Gree� To�•rnhouses, and the Center City Redevelopment Area, which was the business
or retail core of the city. That even added more emphasis to the i�ea of
passive improverients for cortmunity wide purposes.
Mr. Robinson stated that the park itself does have a number of existing improve-
ments, including two softball fields on the south, an active open play area in
the center, and tfie beginning of what is a passive forested area on the north
end of the park, some nice tennis courts and existing parking facilities on
both the north and south ends of the park.
Ptr, Ro6inson stated City Staff has looked at a nu�her of concepts thrnuqh �heir
desiyn analysis. There was an open play area adjacent to the two existing soft-
ball fields they want to keep open and utilize. 7here was some existing topo-
graphy in back with the large hill (sleddin� area) which was definitely an asset.
The Parks Degt, has already started to plant some nice trees on the area wfiich
used to be a softball field on the north with the idea that this might be a nice
passive pic�ic area,
Mr. Rohinson stated they then moved on to a preferred concept, taking into
account the existing assets in the parY.. They took the central core area and
added sor,ie amenities. There was a very nice turf cover on the park and +hey
want to continue to maintain that, Special features would include:
1. Wading poo� with fountain-type area - centrally located in the
park away from the residents with a buffer and herntinq.
Z. Installation of a restroom facility (stron9ly recommendeA hy the
Parks & Recreation Cormission)
7E
PARKS & RECREATIOt1 COMMISSIOt� h1EETING, AUGUST 4, 1986 PAGE 3
3. Create a nicer tot lot - they would propose tot lot equipment similar
to what they have in other neighborhood parks but on a grander scale.
4. Picnic area with gazebo, picnic tables and grills (north end)
5. Provision of a stage with the natural hill as the ampitheater -
away from the neighborhood to the east.
Mr. Robinso� stated they would propose to break these improvements into three
phases for construction; and development could take 5-10 years depending on
hoa� the project would be funded:
Phase I: Utilities necessary for restroan and fountain, water, storm sewer,
sanitary sewer, water, electric, plantings, restroom facilities,
and picnic facilities
Total Cost: 563,515
Phase II: Tot lot structure, planting and seeding of trees and shrubs
Total Cost: 388,293
Phase III: Pathways, gazebo, ampitheater, final plantin4s, benches, lightinq
Total Cost: �,52,947
Mr, Kondrick opened up the discussion to the audience.
Mr. Joe Rusch, 561 - 63rd Ave., stated he would be concerned that if the tot
lot was screened from view from the neighbors that a youngster could fall into
a wading pool or fountain and drown or get injured and no one would see it
happen. He stated right now he can see the tot lot from his front yard; and
if sanething happened, he could possibly call someone and get help, hut not
if the view was obstructed.
Mr, Robinson stated that when they do the screening, they could leave some
visibility in there. They were not talV.ing about a major harrier around the
tot lot.
A resident asJ:ed �f the restroom would be �pen a77 year around or just for
Pz-2', seasons.
Mr. Robinson stated that was a level of detail he was not really prepared to
answer at this time. The possibility of havin� the restroon facility open
during the winter would have to be discussed when they qet into the design
stage.
Ms. Maxine Martin, 6141 6th St „ asked if there was any possibility of getting
the bottom £nurtennis courts resurfaced as they were in pretty bad shape.
7C
PAPKS & RECREATION COHMISSION HEETIN6 AU6UST 4, 1986 PAf,E 4
Mr. Ralph Volkman stated that if tfiings go well. there is money in the budget
to resurface those courts next year.
One resident stated she really appreciated the lights at the top of the hill.
5he felt that she could walk through the whole park safely at night because
of those lights.
A resident asked how this redevelopment would be funded,
Mr, Robinson stated all they have right now is a proposed budget. There is
no funding at this time. If the City Louncil feels this is a worthwhile
project, the City Council will have to budget for the improvements. 41e did
not see any direct assessment to the neighbors.
Mr, Robinson stated the two largest user groups of the park would probably be
children and the elderly.
A resident stated she was concerned about the corner of 63rd Ave. & 7th St.
It was very dangerous to cross there, especially for a chilA, an elderly
person, or someone in a wheelchair. She felt the City should consi�er a four-
way stop at this location if they are planning on making the park more attrac-
tive to these age groups.
There �rere four neighbors present who lived across the street on 7th St.
Mr. Robinson asked these people if they felt all their neighbors who were not
present at the meetinq would object to the development as beinq proposed by
the City. All four neighbors stated they could not see any reason why their
neighbors would object to the proposed redevelopment for Comnons Park. They
felt their neighbors would welcome the improvements to the park.
One resident stated it would be nice i� the winter time to have some plowed
winter walking paths.
Mr. Robinson stated that the next step after this meeting was to go to the
Planning Cor�nission to get more input and then on to the City Council. He
stated he was loaking at ]ate August for the Planninq Commission and early
September to the City Counci{,
Dr. BouAreau stated he would encourage aIl those present at the meeting to
talk to thefr neighbars and other users of the park relayinq what was
presented by Staff at this meeting, The Gity would welcane any feasihle
suggestions, and they should contact Mr. Robinson or the Parks & Recreation
Dept, at City Nall. He stated the City needs the citizen input, because the
Fridley parks v�ere the citizens' parks, and City Staff was there to make
the parks the way the citizens wanted them.
Mr. Kondrick thanked all those in the audience for coming to the meetinq,
7D
PARKS P� RECREATION COMMISSION HEETI��G, AUGUST 4, 1986 PAGE 5
MOTION BY MR. ALLEN� SECONDED BY MH. GARGARO� TNAT BASED ON THE P0.5727VE
�SE FRQM THE NEIGHBORNOOD FOR THE PROP0.SED IMPROVEMENTS � Q�NMONS PRRK,
TXE PARKS & RECREATIOfI CQMMISSION WISHED 21� REAPFIRN TO TXE PLANNZNG COMMISSZON
AND CITY COUNCZL THEIR STRONG SUPPORS OF TH£ COMMON5 PAI;K REDEVEIAPMENT,
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE, CXRIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THF. MOTZON
CARRIED UNANZMOUSLY.
2. DIRECTOR'S REPORT:
a. State Youth Softball Tournament
Mr. Kirk stated 58 youth teams were arriving from around the state for
this tournament and he had just started registering teams before the
tornado hit. There were only about three teams on the field so they got
them off the field and into the block building. Despite the heavy rain
that night and the next night, the games went on schedule and everything
went well. He stated they had a lot of compliments on the park, and the
fYSA helped the City in putting on the tournament,
b. Stevenson Playground Equipment
Mr. Kirk stated the Comnissioners had received a copy of a memo from
Mr. Qureshi to John Flora stating that the City would have no problem
funding $4,000 worth of equipment along with $2,000 labor to install
playground equipment at Stevenson School.
Mr. Kirk stated Bruce Nelson, President of the 5tevenson PTA, and
Jerry Seeman. School District 14, had been informed that the City would
contribute this money and labor and that the billing would have to be
made by the School District to the City.
c. Craig Park Update
Mr. Kirk stated that at the last Corrm�ission meeting, two Craig Park
neighbors, Karla Stevenson and Beverly Nelson, were present requesting
some upgrading to Craig Park,
Mr. Ralph Volkman stated they have put picnic tables near the playground
as this was one of the requests made by Ms, Stevenson and P1s. Nelson.
He stated Curt QaFriberg and he fiave looked at the park and they are goinq
to possibly expavid the play area another 20 ft, to the south, flnce they
get the playground equipment, they will meet with Ms. Stevenson and
Ms. Nelson t¢ show them this equipment and see if that is what they would
like irt the park. Ne stated he hoped this wou)d take care of the concerns
of that �eic�ht�o.rhoad,
]F
PARKS R RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 4, 1986 __ PAGE 6
d. Springbrook Nature Center Damage
Mr. Volkman showed the Cortmissioners some pictures of the Nature Center
after the tornado taken by Siah St. Clair. Mr. St. Clair has estimated
the damages on some of the structures and paths at about 550-100,00Q.
That was not considering the loss of thousands of trees.
Mr, Kondrick stated Mr. Volkman and Mr. St. Clair ca]led quite a nur�er
of people to see if anyo�e was interested in caning in and taking out
the fallen trees. He stated they got a very poor response. Some of the
excuses made were that it was too much of a mess, it was too expensive
to come in and haul out the wood, and that the wood was not of a good quality.
Mr. Kondrick stated programning is continuing at the Nature Center as usual,
and Mr, St. Clair is talking about plans to plant new trees and get thinas
cleaned up.
3. NEW BUSINESS:
a. Letter from Fridley YFW
t4r. Kirk stated that at the last meeting, he had reported on the Special
Olympics program sponsored by the Fridley VFW that was held at the
Comnunity Park on July 12th. Commissioner Young had stated he would like
Staff to convey to ihe Fridley VFW that the City would be more than willing
to cooperate with them again with another Special Qlympics in the future.
The very next day Gary Maurstad, Sr. Vice Cortmander of the Fridley VFW,
called to ask if there was any possibility of holding another Special
Olympics at the Fridley Comnunity Park. Mr. Y.irk had asked him to submit
a request to the City in writing.
11r. Kirk stated the Comnissioners had a copy of a letter dated July 27, 1986,
from Mr. Maurstad in which he thanked the City of Fridley for the use of
the Conmunity Park on July 12. Mr. Maurstad also was asking permission
from the City of Fridley to use the Coinnunity Park on the second Saturday
of July in either 1988 or 1989 for a Special Olympics program.
MOTION BY MR. YDUNG� SECONDED BY MR. ALLEN� TO RECEZVE TNE LETTER FROM
MR. MAURSTRD, SENIOR VICE COXHAKDER, FRZDLEY VFW POST 363 DRTED
JULY 2Z, I986,
IIPDN A Vd7CE VOR`E� ALL YDTING AYE, CHRIRPERSON KONDRICK DF,CLARF,D TNF.
MOTZON CARRIED UNANZMOUSLY,
MOTION BY MR, YOUNG� SECONDED BY MS. SCHREINER� TO GIVE TXF, FRTDLEY Vf'47
POST 363 THE CZTY OF FRIDLEY'S SUPPORT IN SECURING TXF. BID FOR THF 1988
QR I984 SPECIAL OLYMPICS PROGRRM TO BE XELD AT TNE COMMUNITY PARK.
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHASRPERSON KONDRICK I�CLARED THF.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY. �
ZF
Pl4RK5 R RECREATI�N COMh1ISSI0P1 PIEETING, AUGUST 4, 1986 PAGE 7
4. OLD BUSINESS:
a. Triangular Piece of Property at Creekridge Park
Mr. Gargaro stated he had noticed in the July 21 City Council meeting
minutes, pages 10-13, that a motion was made by Councilman Schneider
•'to direct staff to prepare a careful analysis of tf�e cost for acquirina
parcels A, B, C and D for park purposes", Mr, Gargaro stated he would
like to know if, in fact, this was feasible.
Mr. Robinson stated that at the City Council meeting that same niqht, the
City Council was reviewing the Cfeekridge plat again. Staff has done
some analysis as requested by the City Council related to how much
acreage would be added to the park and the cost. He stated that at the
July 14 meeting, the Parks & Recreation Comnission did recommend that the
City sell the triangular piece of property on Creekpark Lane.
Mr. Robinson stated in his report to the City Council, he 6rought to
the City Council's attention the fact that the Parks & Recreation
Commission was not apprised of the fact that there might be some additional
park land available and that if there was a decision to buy more park land,
the Parks & Recreation Cormnission would probably be interested in looking
at tlie feasibility of adding that to the park, Of course, one of the key
concerns was that the land was cut through by a street and miqht be an
attractive nuisance. Mr. Kirk had pointed out that Summit Square was laid
out in a similar fashion on two sides of a street, and as far as the City
knew, there have been no accidents at that park.
Mr, Robinson stated there are four parcels that are proposed to be split
off by Mr. Brickner. The two southerly portions are 1/2 acre and the two
northerly portions are 1J2 acre. The Parks & Recreation Correnission could
decide to recommend the City pick up none of the parcels, all of the
parcels, or the two southerly portions. If they were to add the two
southerly parcels of 1/2 acre to what was existing wiih the triangular
piece,there would be about 32 acres.
Mr, Gargaro stated a petition has gone around this neiqhborhood by Che
neighbors asking the City to acquire more park land. He stated he wanted
to re-emphasize that the Gomnission never had any knowledge of this
additional property and the Cartnission fioped this would come back to them.
t4r. Kondrick stated he had talked to Councilman Schneider and had told
him that at the July l4 meeti�g, the Parks & Recreation Cortanission acted
only on the information they had at that time.
7G
PARKS & RECREATION COPIMISSION MEETING, AU6UST 4, 1986 PAGE $
ADJOUR��MENT•
MOTION BY HR. RLLEN� SECDNDED BY MR. GARGARO� TO AATOURN THE MEETZNG. UPON A
YOICE VOTB,ALL VOTING AYE� CNAIRPERSUV KONL&ICK DECIARED THE AUGUST 4� Z986�
pARKS 6 RECRERTION COMMISSION MEETING AATOURNED AT 9:10 P,1N,
Res ectfully su 'tted;
yn a a
Recording Secretary
�a�s and Rure.�tron �j'�' �, ���°
� a�-n.�
�`�� �
7 0�^''
?.�. ,�1, ��-�,�.
�o�-�' �:�-�— .
��
-'�� � �
G/9G2� L./AtJ)f�I�vS��Z
� �
�r�- I�3� � , .����
�,� ��' �-a-sG�
�Xr..G t� i'Ll-r�i�
0�
�
� ��2:-0��--
�l r1�.�
�"t.�-�� j�['`r��
��wu..:,.-�.��
L ' ' ��
�� .:�
�. � �
��
���,�.�r- �" ;
�� i t�^�`iJ ��,� ���'= �'�..
>A<-� �7am�s�n
�e ��P�t TFK [ L
��� �,���
���
� ���
�GQ���e.o�
�3� � - �
f 3oa � _ �
L � � �^..c�..�'�� � - `� � - �.
�3�- G3'`� CLtrQ /1Z �',
6 3 a- b 3"� C��°-- `�- �•
���i-�3/�..��. �%E'
6 y � _ b � =� Cc�.-�. � �' ,
d /z� Z.-� ,r/r
�/.3 6 7'�'` �'.E _
�/�D - � �'�� `�'/� �
!SG - �3n� ��}7 �
�n � � — �° �h� � � C�
J~�C j- �G' 3�,�..f n,� ' E.
s�'y - 63 �`° � . N. F
S-Yg G3 �� �</E �t
6i��, � �.� � g
�zo� C,�i�f'a� fiP /'r/`
�'� /— �3-�-�C- Q.�-�- %� �
'�r - l�3`-�' �'��. /�E_
S/�% � ��'���� �J�
�Z ; 1.�� f� .�
3ia- �3=d��. �-
�I`%� `3'� -s�• �✓� � � � o �- �
G 3�/ �"� st' �vc --
��yr- 6� s�` �✓. �.
G zzv ,�..c�J ���
,SC� i - 63 �-a! � ai `
b.�as D�"� �� �I�
71;
,
7I
PHASE 1:
Sanitary Seuer - 285 £eet of pipe at 515.00 per £oot $4,275.00
Connection 500.00
Storm Sewer .- 650 feet of pipe at $15.00 per foot 9,750.00
Planhole 750.00
Connection 250.00
liatcr - 260 feet of pipe at S1a.00 per foot �,640.00
Tap 1,000.00
Tao Services 500.00
Glectric -
Plantings
?0 Pin Oaks, $3�1.00, 3" B� B
10 Austrian Pine, $1A2.00, 6' 6 F, B
Restroom Facilities
Picnic Facilities
Grill, 5 at $%2.00 per grill
Picnic Tables, 10 at 5'_'_A.00 per table
Garage Cube, 5 at 53�1?.00 per cube
5,000.00
6,GZ0.00
1.420.00
?5,500.00
360.00
2,'_4D.00
1,710.00
TOTAL: $63,515.0(1
7J
PHASE ?:
Tot Lot
Pla}� Structure
Sand at �7.00 per square yard
Frame of Box
Planting and Seeding
Trees and Shrubs
25 Green Spruce, 5142.00, 6' B
8 Pin Oa}:, j3.i1.00, 3" B£� B
1? Qua}:ing Aspen, 5161.00, 2"
17 Hackberr}•, $30A.00, 3" BF,B
6 SnoN�drift Crab, $195.00, 2
18 Austrian Pine, 5142.00, 6'
Dlulch and Seed at $2,200.00 per acre
Sho�+'er Fountain
C�.]
B $ B
1/2" g $ B
B $ B
5i-�,e�a.00
1,200.00
1,500.00
3,550.00
�,6J8.00
1,93_'.00
5,165.00
9%5.00
2,556.00
3, �00.00
50,500.00
TOTAL: SSS,293.00
7K
. PHASE 3:
Excavation Pathkays
7ot Lot (120.25 cubic yards)
Gazebo
hlaterials PathNay (8 feet wide)
Class 5, �8.50 per ton
�tix, $20.00 per ton
Oil, $2A0.00 per ton
Gazebo
Structure
Floor
Railing
Bench
Shipping
Amphitheater
st3s�
Planting and Seeding
1'rees and Shrubs
10 Hackberrv
4 Pin Oak
10 Col Green Spruce
40 iCe6ber Junipers, 517.95, �3 Pot
6 Sno�drift Crabs, 5195.00, 2 1/2" B F, B
Dfulch and Seed, 1/2 acre at 5_',�00.00 per acre
Benches, 70 at 5161.00 per bench
Lighting, b, F:im 12' lamp at 52,200 ner lamp
Round Dbdel, IS at $500.00 per model
$ 484.00
.i31.00
50.00
1, 700 . 00
1,93a.00
1,39?.00
6,995.00
1,995.0(l
657.00
59 7. 00
700.00
s,000.00
3,04D.00
1,3?4.00
1,420.00
718.00
1.1i0.00
I,100.00
1,610.00
13,200.00
i,500.00
TOTAL: 52,9�-.00
�,--_ �; ��
/ i�\
/ \
� � �
�
\ 1
.• �—�
/
_ _ ____ __ _� `
�,
.
��
,
%
�f !- .i -f 1' � y
z
0
�� ~�
�': �?:
� .. ,�
u
- ( __-, ,
� ._ _ �
a
i
�
.
�I
�
�
a'
�;,
�
1'
�
�
i
I
��
� 1..._
a
�' 4r �� F p ' .
u �.� t � 1
� L`..� � �� � •� F � �' � V: .�.� ... �+� ! l}
1 U'"
• . `,, l:;_
< i � `�
� � t. �:.���-'. �` �c�t-- � �' ��
. o c�;: =�
�:: • �� ; .�:
t�� � �°� �-� -- c; � � �,
i � y � " �
.. �'1� Y .��Sw� „ ^, i.i L
�, t� ., {I 4
�� �41 .. .. � �'. ` �.�4- ��� f r _
U
; f.,� €� J �f `;_ � .
�- G't.': � �.;� �; tr � : C.� . .
. � �,
• _ ._ .. .. . �� r .'i
�1'� �� ,� �� �.��,:- �.
_. \/�''(� � �. (� �'
�� .i .f ♦ 'r � �J .ti �. . � � �r'! � �.wr'
. Y. � y � � . .� r �1+ .
r �, ---� ,G�c�:�c:::.% , ; �
�-r � �� � , -.:
��-,, �
; � � , ,,-,
� �1 ( � --
�� �_._�!'_ U L! �. . .v �i_V_ti>_� `: � Li'G������ I,j
- - --
- �----�---. . -- . ...--- -. .. _—_. _.._-r,-.
.._ . ____.. . . .___ .1.��
!
I
,`
i ' -
r_ _ . _..
��- -
7�