PL 10/08/1986 - 6882PLANNING C(X�R�LiSSION MEETING
Y�NESDAY, OC.'I'OBER 8, 1986
7:30 P.M.
Carole Haddad
910 Rice Creek Terrace N.E.
Fridley, MN 554.i2
City of Fridley
A G E N D A
FLAt�B�]ING WMMISSION MEETING WF�NFSIY�Y, OCit7BIIt 8, 1986 7:30 P.M.
Location: Coimcil Chamiber (upper leael)
CALI, � ORDER:
ROLL (?�LL•
APPROVE Pf1iNNING �N,MISSION MINUTFS• SEPTF'.NIDER 24 1986
HJBLIC HFARING: Q�NSIDERp.TION OF A SFEQAL USE PERMIT,
SP #86-16, BY Q�IUR(I�1 Q9 �i3E NDVE . . . . . . . . . . . .
I�r Section 205.07.1, C, 2 of the Fridley City Code,
to allaa a church and private school on Lots 2, 3 and
6, except the South 200 feet thereof, Neloland Gardens,
all located in Section 24, �30, 1�24, Anoka County,
Minnesota, and Lot 4, Melaland Gardens, located in
Section 24, �30, F�24, Anoka Cotmty, Minnesota, and
Lot 5, except for the Westerly 110 feet of the Southerly
200 feet, Melolanci Gardens, located in Section 24, �30,
I�24. Anoka Caunty, Minnesota, a� Lot 1, except for
the Southerly 210 feet, Meloland Gardens, located in
Section 24, �30, I.�24, Anoka County, Minnesota, and
Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 92. Anoka County,
Minnesota, and Lot 33, Block 3, M�ore Lake Aills, Anoka
County, Minnesota, anci Lot 1, and Auditar's Subdivision
No. 92. I,ot 17 may be encunbered b� a recreational lease
riuuiing in favor of tl�e City of FYidley, tl�e �me being
1401 Garciena Avenue N. E
�9BLED 9/24/86: PUBLIC HFARING: �NSIDF.RATION OF A
SPEQAL USE PERMIT, SPP #86-13� BY ROt�UaLD QiRLSTa1�1
OF R T. C. AU7ONDTIVE . ,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I�r Section 205.14.1, C, 4 of the FYidley City Code, to
allow a reg�ir garage on Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 3, City
View, �e same being 5755 University Avenue N.E.
PAGES
. . . . 1
J� ,�.
_�G�
. . . . 2 - 2J
QJNSIDERATION OF A LOT SH,IT, L.S. #86-07, BY JEFF
GEI,DERT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3H
Sglit off�the Westecly 140 feet of Lot 17, except the
South 55.0 feet thereof, Auditor's Sutx3ivision No. 22,
the same being 6291 Central Avenue N.E.
RE.'�1VE HCUSII� & RIDEVII,OPMEtdT AUgIORITY MINU'IFS OF
SEPPEDSIIt 11. 1486 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . WHITE
RE'C£1VE IINII2�41EN7AL QUALITY O�AP7iSSION MII�17f5 OF
SF.Pi'ENBER 16. 1986 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BI,UE
RELEI�IE APPFALS Wl�IISSION MINUIESS OF SEPPENBER 30, 1986 .... YII,LCW
O'g3ER BUSINESS:
A.LiTQIFQ�,TJT
� '
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PIANNING COtAfI5SI0N MEETING, SEPTEMBER 24, 1986
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Billings called the September 24, 1986, Planning Commission meet-
ing to order at 7:33 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Pzesent: Steve BilLings, Dean Saba, Sue Sherek, Donald
Betzold and Rich Svanda
Mem6ers Absent: David Kondrick and AL Gahe1
O[hers Present: Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator
David Harris
(Sse attached List)
APPROVAL OF AUGUST 20. 1986, PIANNING COMt�IISSION MINUTES:
MOTION 3? MR, SABA, SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD, TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 20, 1986,
PLp.NNING CONAff5SI0N M).NUTES AS WRITTEN.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CAAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE P10TION
CARRIED UNANIt�YJUSLY.
1.
A SPECTAT. i15F. PERMTT_ SP �'t86-12
Per Section 205.07.1, C,1 of the Fridley City Code, to a11ow a second
accessory building on Lot 6D, Auditor's Subdivision No. 21,_the same
being 6620 Lucia Lane N.E.
MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MS. SHEREK, TO WAIVE THE READING OF
THE PUBLIC HEAF,ING NOTICE AND OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLIRED THE
PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:35 p.m.
Mr. Robinson stated this is a request for a second accessory garage
Located on Lucia Lane with double frontage on Highway 65 and Lucia
Lane, just north of Mississippi Street. He stated the property is
zoned R-1 and in a predominately single family neighborhood. He
stated the petitioner is proposing to construct a new garage, approxi-
mately 526 square feet, in front of the existing detached garage and
attach it to the house.
I�fr. Robinson stated s[aff was recommending approval with the following
stipulations: (1) a hard surface driveway be provided with construction
of the garage; (2) tires and debris be removed from the side yard; (3)
boat be moved to the side/rear yard or stored inside garage; and (4)
garage ma[erials, siding and roofing are to match existing house.
PLANNING COMhffSSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 24 1986 PAGE 2
hh. Throndson stated the new garage was to provide extra storage
for vehicles as well as for a boat and trailer. He stated no
mechznical work would be done in the garage. I•h�. Throndson stated
the existing garage was in good shape and when the new garage is
constructed, everything would be re-sided. He stated he had no
problem with the stipulations recommended by staff.
t'7. Betzold asked if there was a reason why the petitioner was leaving
about an eighE foot gap between the existing garage and house. He
questioned why this couldn't be filled in and attached to the house to
r,ake one large garage.
Mr. Throndson stated this was what he originally proposed, but had
some negative feedback. He stated he would have no problem with
closing in this gap, if it was allowed by the City Code. He stated
the new garage wouLd have footings under it because it would be
attached [o [he house and the existing garage is on a floating slab.
He stated the existing garage has been there for 20 years and has
not moved and he was told by some construction people it would be
feasible Co attach it to the new garage. He stated if it is not
allowed by Code, it could then be detached.
I�k. Robinson stated this matter could be worked out with the Building
Inspector.
MOTION BY MEt. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING�
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNEINIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:42 p.m.
AIOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY D15, SHEREK, TO RECOPiMEND TO THE
CITY COUnCIL APPROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERPfIT, SP �k86-12, WITH THE
FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS:
I. A hard surface driveway be provided with construction of the
garage;
2, Tires and debris be removed from the side yard;
3, Boat be moved to the side/rear yard or stored inside garage; and
4. Garage materials, siding and roofing are to match existing house.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING �YE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE
MOTION C.�RRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Chairperson Billings stated this item would go to the City Council on
October 6, 1986.
2.
PLANNING COhL�fIS5I0N MEETING SEPTEMBER 24 1986 PAGE 3
Per Sec[ion 205.1G.1, C,4 of the Fridley City Code, to allow a
repair garage on Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 3, City View, the same
being 5755 University Avenue N.E.
MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MS. SHEREK, TO FI�,IUE THE READING
OF THE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE AND OPEN Tf-lE PUBLIC HFJ+RING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALI, VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLAFED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPENED AT -:=� p.m.
hh. Robinson stated this property was located on the east si:� of
University, north of 57th Place and south of 58th. He stated the
property was zoned C-2, local business, bu` does abu[ residential on
the east. He stated the proposal was to establish a repair garage.
Ph. Robinson stated the past business located on this property wa�
Shorty's Towing, He stated that according t� the propert�• ou�ner Shoriy's
has vacated the building, but are still using part of the storage �•ard. He
s[ated the petiCioner, Ptr. Christens�n, has occupied this building for ta�o
months without a special use permit.
i`h. Robinson stated staff ia proposing a plan they feel is minimal
in terms of improvements on the site and recommending the following
stipula[ions: (1) install landscaping as per City plan dated
September 24, 1986 including sodding, planting and edging and rock
mulch with weed barrier for each shrub bed by October 31, 1986; (2)
provide autocnatic lawn sprinkling for a11 gree❑ areas by October 31,
198b; (3) provide six inch concrete curb and gutter around all hard
surface and driveway openings, as per City plan dated September 24,
1986 by October 31, 1936; (4) curb openings to be modified to comply
witk� City plan dated September 24, 1986 by October 31, 1986; (5)
sealcoat and stripe parking lot as per City plan dated September 24,
1986 by October 31, 1986; (6) provide hardsurface driveways 10 feet
into storage yard on north and south as per City plan dated September
24, 1986 by October 31, 1986; (7) provide eight foot high solid wood
fence and gates (ma[erial and style to be approved by City) as per
City plan dated September 24, 1986 by October 31, 1986; (8) a11 refuse
and waste material sha11 be stored in dumpsters to be located inside
s[orage area immediately; (9) all materials including inoperable
vehicles sha11 be stored inside storage yard, below top of fence
immediately; (10) remove or relocate to center of storage yard the
blue green trailer in storage yard; (11) remove all vehicLes intended
for saLes or leasing immediately - special use permit i�86-13 is for
auto repair only; no sales or leasing of vehi.cles is or will be per-
mitted on this site; (12) remove truck body parts from roof of building
immediately; (13} repaint building facade and trim to campliment
brick color by October 31, 1986; (14) submit to and pay for an in-
dependent soil [esting to determine extent of soil contamination by
November 14, 1986; (15) provide remedial soil work as indicated by
testing by June l, 1487; (16) no on-street parking of vehicles ser-
viced or waiting to be serviced is permitted; (17) provide a City
PLANNING COMDfISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 24 1986 PAGE 4
approved sign which does not include mention of vehicle sales or
leasing; and (18) provide a Letter of credit in the amount of
$10,000 to cover all of the above stipulations.
I•h. Robinson stated when the City learned that Mr. Schuur, owner
of this property, was moving his business, he was sent a letter
advising him a special use permit would be needed for any auto-
motive business on this property. He stated the City did not
receive any response to that letter. hh. Robinson stated when the
petitioner moved onto the premises, the City sent another letter
requesting an application be made for a special use permit. He
stated this was in early July, and it was now the end of September.
Mr. Biliings stated one of the stipulations was to stripe the parking
lot as per the City's plan. He felt the number of parking stalls
provided would not be adequate as the petitioner has had as many as
19 to 26 cars parked in the last several days.
hfr. Robinson stated he believed some of those cars were there for leasin�;
and sales which was an unauthorized business.
Mr. Christensen stated his business was previously located at the
Sinclair Station on 61st and Central. He stated when he first con-
tacted the City to see if he needed any permits in order to relocate
his business at this location, he was told he did not. He stated he
was not aware he needed a special use permit when he worked out an
agreement with the property owner. He stated he found out he needed
a special use permit for the sign and business after he moved.
hfr. Christensen stated he has been working with hh. Wiersma of the
City staff to get things cleaned up and make some improvements. He
stated the building was quite run down and they have had to do quite
a bit of work on the inside. He stated the weather has been too wet
to do much as far as improvements to the outside of the building.
I�h. Christensen stated by next week, most of the cars shouLd be gone,
either moved to the back or picked up by customers. He stated he
felt his business would be good for the neighborhood and he wanted to
get the property cleaned up and looking nice.
Mr. Billings asked Mr. Christensen how many empLoyees he wouLd have
workiag. Mr. Christevsen stated he was basicalLy working by himself,
but would be hiring one person for the winter season.
Nh. Christensen stated when he started the business, he thought it
wou13 be nice to have cars for customers r.o lease or rent for a period
of time so the customar was not ivvconvenienced when a car had to be
left. He stated he has now found tiiis would require another permit.
Mr. Robinson stated for sales or leasing, Pfr . Christensen would need
a State license, as well as a City permit. He stated the site was
very Limited in terms of parking and did not think a sales or leasing
business was appropriate.
PLANNING CO*4IISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 24 1986 PAGE 5
Ms. Sherek asked once the space in back was cleaned up, how much
space could be used for parking vehicles. Nh. Christensen stated
he thought they could get 25 to 30 cars in the back. He stated the
owner, Mr. Schuur, wi11 be using the storage yard for storing "snow-
birds" in the winter.
Mr. Robinson stated he had met with both I�h. Christensen and Mt.
Schuur and it was his understanding that Mr. Christensen would be
leasing the building and the storage yard would be hir. Schuur's.
He stated if tha[ was the case, Ph. Christensen could not count on
the storage yard for parking cars.
Ms. Sherek stated what they really have are two petitioners. She
Stated the largest portion of the stipulations involved capital
improvements which affected the owner, Mr. Schuur. She stated since
the property owner was not at the meeting, she questioned how Mr.
Christensen could agree to all the stipulations.
Mr. Christensen stated Ph, Schuur was out of town and could not be
at this meeting. He stated he wanted the public hearing postponed,
but apparently the hearing notices had already gone out so it could
not be postponed.
I•h. Biliings felt it would be appropriate to table this item until
[he next meeting since the owner had wanted the hearing postponed,
MOTIOtl BY NS. SHERER, SECOIv�ED BY PIIt, SAE?., TO CONTINUE THIS PUBLIC
HEARING TO THE NEXT MEETING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE
PfOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
hh. Robinson stated perhaps a stipula[ion could be made that a certain
percentage of the storage yard remain open as part of the lease agree-
ment so the petitioner would know he had a certain amount of scorage
space for cars.
The Commissioners felt this was a good idea and suggested Mr. Christen-
sen discuss this possi6ility with Mr, Schuur.
3. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER�TION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP 1k86-14, BP
DAVID HARRIS:
Per Section 205.17.1, C,1 of the Fridley City Code, to allow offices
not associated with a principal use on Lot 7, BLock 1, Paco Industrial
park, the same being 250 Commerce Circle South.
MOTION BY MEt. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MS. SHEREK, TO WAIVE THE READING
OF TIiE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE AND OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECIARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANII�USLY ANU THE pUBLIC HEARING OPENED AT 8:12 p.m.
PLANNIPG COI�4fISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 24 1986 PAGE 6
Mr. Robinson stated this property was located wes[ of University
and south of Cormnerce Circle South. He stated the request is for
a special use permit for offices not associated with the principal
use in an industrial zone. He stated the property is zoned M-1,
light industrial.
Mr. Robinson stated the building with 21,040 square feet was sub-
stantially completed in terms of construction. He stated 50 parking
stalls were provided in the plan and the building is intended as a
spec, office/warehouse facility. He stated it is estimated that about
half could be used for office and half for warehouse, and seill meet the code
for parking. The quality of the building suggests a good number of office te
t�h. Robinson stated the only stipulation recommended by staff is for
[he developer to provide the City with tenant information prior to
each occupancy of the building. He stated the information is to
include intended use, number of empLoyees and gross square footage of
each type of usage e.g. office, warehouse, manufacturing. He stated
City approval of any proposed tenant is contingent upon sufficient
parking supply.
I�, Robinson stated a similar stipulation was required for the Win-
field Development and this same strategy was used for the East River
Road Business Center. He stated since there has been a parking prob-
1em in this area, this stipulation would help alleviate any addi[ional
future problems.
t�ff . Harris stated the Community Park, located to the south, has in-
adequate parking and he has offered the City a shared use of some of
his parking.
Mr. Robinson stated he has discussed this possibility with Public Works
and Parks and Recreation and, even though it may be desirable, there
could possibly be a potential conflict when there are daytime activities
at the park and Pir. Harris would need his parking during this time.
Mr. Grant Johsson, representing the properties to the north of Mr.
Harris' building, indicated they had a significant probLem that now
exists with the parking. He was concerned that this aituation would
become worse and create addi[ional needs for on-street parking.
Pk. Billings stated the Code requires a certain number of stalls for
office space and a certain number for warehouse space and the special
use permit is to allow a mixed use of the buiLding. He stated staff
has recommended a stipulation to the special use permit that P'h. Harris
provide the City with tenant information as to the occupancy so the
City can monitor how many people are using office space and how many
are using warehouse space so there isn't a situation where you have
need for more parking space than what is avaiLable.
hh. Harris stated if sufficient parkivg space isn't provided for the
tenants, they would go elsewhere. He stated it is hoped to have full
occupancy of the bui3ding by next summer.
Pls'�NNIrG COMhffSSION MEETING SEPTEPfBER 24 1986 PAGE 7
4.
Mr. Betzold felt the stipulation recommended 6y staff would provide
for monitoring the parking and questioned if there was a need to
review the special use permit a[ some future date.
Ms. Sherek felt if someone wasn't complying with the special use
permit, staff would bring che matter before the Commission.
MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY MS. SHEREK, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
UPON A VOIC� VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIItPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE PUSLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:30 p.m.
MOTION BY MR. SVANDA, SECONDED BY M[t. BETZOLD, TO RECOMMEND TO THE
CITY COUNCIL APPgOVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP �f86-14, WITH THE
FOLLOWING STIPULATION:
1. Developer to provide the City with tenant information prior to
each occupaocy of building. This information is to include the
intended use, number of employees and gross square footage of each
type of usage e.g. office, warehouse, manufacturing. City approval
of any proposed tenant is con[ingent upon sufficient parking supply.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, C13aIRPERSON BILLINGS DECL,aRED THE
MOTIOh CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY,
Cnairperson BilLings stated this item would go to the City Council on
October 6, 1986.
PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PER`IIT, SP �.86-15, BY
NORTH SUBUR&1N HOSPIT�L DISTRICT:
Per Section 205.07.1, C,2 of the Fridley City Code, to allow a day
care facility; per Section 205.07.1, C,5 of the Fridley City Code,
to allow automobile parking lots for off-s[reet parking spaces; and
per Section 205.07.1, C,6 of the Fridley City Code, to allow a clinic
on Lots 1 through 5 and those parts of Lots 8 through 12 lying Northerly
of a line drawn from a point on the Wes[ line of said Lot 8 distant 5
feet Southerly of the Northwest corner of said Lot 8 to a point on the
East line of said Lot 12 distanC 75 feet Southerly of the Northeast
corner of said Lot 12, a11 in Block 1, Osborne Manor 2nd Addition, the
same being 472 Osborne Road N.E., together with Lot 6, Block L, Osborne
Maoor 2nd Addition, the same being 400 Osborne Road N.E, together with
Lot 7, Block 1, Osborne Manor 2nd Addition, together with adjoining
vacated 76th Avenue N.E., the same being 401 76th Avenue h.E,
MOTION BY KS. SHEREK, SECONDED BY MR, SABA, TO q'AIVE THE READING OF
THE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE AND OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECIARED THE
MDTION CARRIID II23P.NIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPENED AT 8:33 p.m.
PLANNING COh4�fISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 24 1986 PAGE 8
I•h�. Robinson stated this special use permit involves the Fridley
Assembly of God Church and two single family homes located east
of University and south of Osborne Road. He stated the special
use permit is to a11ow a daycare facility, and a clinic to be located
in the existing church building and autom6bile parking on the two adjacent
single famil}' lots. •
Ah, Ro6inson stated the square footage for the clinic is 24,844
and the area designated for the daycare facility on the northeast
side of the building has 3,456 square feet. He stated the daycare
facility could accommodate up to 98 children as per the States Human
Service Department requirements.
hfr�. Robinson stated they are required to provide 207 parking stalls
and will immediately provide 185 with an option to install an
additional SL spaces in the area of the single family homes, if needed.
i�. Robinson stated staff is recommending approval of this special
use permit with the following stipulations: (1) a hardsurface set-
back of 20 feet be provided from the Osborne right-of-way by June 30,
1988; (2) a Landscaping plan be provided to include berming and plant-
ings to screen hardsurface areas, existing and proposed, and install
approved plan by June 30, 1988; (3) an automatic lawn sprinkling
system be provided for all green areas by June 30, 1988; (4) a fenced
tot 1ot area, approximately 20 x 30 feet be provided, with City
approved tot lot equipment prior to daycare starting; (5) pathway to
be installed from daycare to tot lot prior to daycare starting; (6)
concrete curb and gutter be provided for hard surface areas and
driveways, including a five foot setback from buiLding by J�ne 30, 1988;
(7) sealcoat and restripe parking lot and provide required handicapped
stalls by June 30, 1988; (8) provide one-way directional signage where
needed by .Tune 30, 1988; (9) provide an approved dumpster enclosure by
June 30, 1988; (10) remove trailers from property east of church by
October 31, 1986; (11) provide a drainage plan for approval prior to
parking lot work; (12) two single family homes to the west of the
church are included in Special Use Permit 4k86-15 for future parking
onLy. These houses may be leased as single family residences until
such tima as the City determines the need for additional parking for
clinic/daycare use; (13) resolve taxable status of property with City
and County Assessor prior to City Council approval; and (14) provide a
performance bond to cover improvements including future parking in the
amount of $20,000 prior to closing on church property.
2�. Buratti, representing the North Suburban Hospital District, stated
he didn't believe the trailers could be removed by October 31 as they
are being used for Sunday school cLasses.
t�. Bi12.ings thought this stipulation shuuld be cE�ange.d so that the
trailers are removed from the property east of the church at such
time that the church vacates the property.
PLANRING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 24 1986 PAGE 9
t�fr. Robinson called the Commission's attention to a memo from the
City Assessor concerning the tax status of this project.
Mr. Buratti stated they are aware it is likely the property wi11
become taxable.
Ms. Sherek stated she understands the property becomes taxable at the
time the use converts. She felt the purpose of the memo was to make
sure the petitioner was aware no plans were aade on the assumption
that the property would be non-taxable,
MOTION B1 hIIt, SVANDA, SECONDED BY M5. SREREK TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC IIEARING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECIARED THE
hDTI01\' Cs1RRIED UN�INIMOUSLY AA�D THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:40 p.m.
Itr. Billings questioned what ac[ion should be taken in regard to
s[ipulation 9�13 pertaining to Che taxable status of the properCy,
Ms. Sherek stated she didn't feel [his stipulatio❑ was needed as
Iong as the petitioner is aware [he property more than likely
wouldn't be tax exempt.
tfr . Buratti stated it isn't possible to resolve this issue at this
time.
Dh. Betzold felt the use of the word ^resolve" m_: be wrong and feLt
the Assessor wanted the petitioner to understand :his issue. He
felt the petitioner sho�ld contact the City Assessor to discuss this
matter.
hh�. Buratti stated he would contact the City Assessor and give [heir
views on how they perceive this situation.
hk. Betzold felt this stipulation couid be eliminated as long as the
petitioner understands he is to meet with the City Assessor and, after
[his meeting, if any questions are rasied, they could be passed along
to the City Council fox iheir meeting.
MOTION BY MR, BETZOLTJ, SECONDED BY MS, SHEREK, TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP iP86-15, WZTH THE FOLLOWING
STIPULATIONS:
1. A hardsurface setback of 20 feet �e provided from the Osborne
Road right-of-way by June 30, I98$.
2, A landscaping plan be provided to include berming and plantings
to screen hardsurface areas, existing and proposed, and ins[a2i
approved plan by June 30, 1988.
PLANNING COI�AtISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 24, 1986 PAGE 10
3. An automatic lawn sprinkling system be provided for a11 green
areas by June 30, 1988.
4. A fenced tot Lot area, approximately 20 x 30 feet be provided,
with City approved tot Lot equipment prior to daycare starting.
5. Pathway to be installed from daycare to tot lot prior to day-
care starting.
6. Concrete curb and gutter be provided for hardsurface areas and
driveways, including a five foot setback from building by June 30,
1988.
7. Sealcoat and restripe parking lot and provide required handicapped
stalls by June 30, 1988.
8. Provide one-way directional signage where needed by June 30, 1988.
9. Provide an approved dumpster enclosure by June 30, 1988.
10. Remove trailers from property east of church aQ such time that
the church vacates the property.
11. Provide a drainage plan for approval prior to parking Lot work.
12. 'i\ao single family homes to the west of the church are included
in this special use permit for future parking only. 11�ese houses
may be leased as single famiLy residences until such time as tt�c
City determines the need for additional parking for clinic/daycare
use.
13. Provide a performance bond to cover improvements including future
parking in the amount of $20,000 prior to closing on church property.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECIARED THE
htOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Chairperson Billings stated this item would go to the City Council on
October 5, 1986.
5. CONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT, L.S, �E86-06, BY DONNA LIIv'D:
Sp1it Lot 7, BLock 2, hloore Lake HiLls into two separate parcels. One
being that part of Lot 7, BLock 2, Moore Lake Hi11s lying Westerly of
the foLlowing described 1ine. Commencing at Northwest corner of said
Lot 7, thence East along the Northerly Line o£ said Lot 7, a distance
of 125 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence deflect to the
right 90 degrees to its point of i.ntersection with the Southerly line
of said Lot 7 and there terminating. The other being that part of
Lot 7, BLock 2, Moore I.ake Hills lying Easterly of the following des-
cribed 1ine. Commencing at Northwest corner of said Lot 7, thence
East along the Northerly Line of said Lot 7, a distarece nf 125 feet to
the actua' Point of beginning; thence deflect to the right 90 degrees
to its point of in[ersection with the Southerly line of said Lot 7 and
there terminating.
PLANNING COt�AIISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 24 1986 PAGE 11
Mr. Robinson stated this prnposal is to split Lot 7, BLock 2, Moore
Lake Hi11s into two separate parcels. He stated the property is
located between ti'oodv Lane and Old Central.
He stated staff is recomnending approval
of the Lot split with four stipulations as follows; (1) new structure
to meet City Code for front yard setback average, 61 feet plus or
minus six feet; (2) fence and shed to be relocated prior to recording;
(3) park fee of $750 required with building permit; and (4) 1ot split
to be recorded at County within six months of Council approval.
MOTIO^: BY MR, BETZOLD, SECONDED BY I•S. SNEREK, TO RECOMMEh'D TO CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL OF LOT SPLIT, L.S. 4686-06, WITH THE FOLLOWING
STIPUII+TIONS :
1. New structure to meet City Code for front yard setback average,
61 feet plus or minus six feet,
2. Fence and shed to be relocated prior to recording.
3. Park fee of $750 required with building permit.
4. Lot split to be recorded at County within six months of Council
approval.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECIARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Chairperso❑ Billings stated this item would go to the City Council on
October 6, 1986.
6. CONSIDERATION OF A VACATION. SAV $$6-05. BY MARTIN NISLEY:
Vaca[e part of a street and �tility easement lying in Lot 32, Revised
Auditor's Subdivision No. 77 (71 1/2 Way cul-de-sac). Easement was
acquired April 15, 1976 and recorded at Anoka County as Document No.
443624.
Mr. Robinson stated this is a request to vacate part of a street and
utiLity easement lying in Lot 32, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No.
77 (71 1/2 Way cul-de-sac). He stated notices of this proposed vac-
ation were sent to the utility companies. Mr. Robinson stated
Northwestern Bell has a buried cable, but believed it was in the street
and not the cul-de-sac area.
Mr. Billings stated he believed the telephone company's cable was
across the street and wouldn't be affected by this vacation. He
stated if it is a problem, the City should retain ,a utility easement
and this should be verified before the City Council meeting.
Mr. Robinson stated that the long range plan is to develop this property
into three single family lots. The area being vacated has already had
the hard surfacing removed and is sodded.
PIANNING CObAff SSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 24 1986 pAGE 12
MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY M5, SHEREK, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL OF VACATION, SAV 4�86-05, BY M�IRTIN NISLEY.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNP.NIMOUSLY.
Chairperson Billings stated this item would go to the City eouncil on
October 20 for a public hearing.
7. REVIEW OF A SPECIAL USE PERNffT� SP �k84-18. BY LEWIS FARR AT 157 RIVER
EDGE WAY n.$.•
Mr. Robinson stated this special use permit was granted i❑ October, 1984
to a11ow a.second accessory building to be used for a workshop. He
stated staff has inspected this structure and Mrs. Farr stated they
have not received any complaints.
Pfr. Robinson stated it is staff's belief that the special use permit
is being used in the spirit intended.
MOTION BY M5, SHEREK, SECONDED SY MR, SAfiA, TO RECEIVE THE STAFF'S
REPORT REGARDING SP 4�84-18.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THL
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8. RECEIVE ENERGY PROJECT COMMITTEE MINUTES OF AUGUST 13, 1986:
MOTION BY hIIi, SABA, SECONDED BY NLS. SHEREK, TO RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF
THE ENERGY PROJECT COMMITTEE OF AUGUST 13, 1986.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
9. RECEIVE HUPIAN RESOURCES COMbffSSION MINUTES OF AUGIJST 14. 1986: (See
Motion or. Pages 6 and 7):
MOTION BY MS, SHEREK, SECONDED BY MR, SA&1, TO RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF
THE HUht9N RESOURCES COMMISSION OF AUGUST 14, 1986.
Ms. Sherek stated in reference to the item on Pages 6 and 7, it is
to inform the Commission regarding the Anoka Couaty Mediation Project.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
LQ. RECEIVE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NIInTUTES OF AUGUST 14. 1986:
MOTION BY MR, BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MS, SHEREK, TO RECEI�IE THE MINUTES
OF THE ROUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF AUGUST 14, 1986.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSdN BILLINGS DECIARED THE
MDTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY,
PI.ANNING COMhffSSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 24 1986 PAGE 13
11. RECEIVE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES OF AUGUST 19, 1986:
MOTION BY MEt. SVANDA, SECONDED BY MS. SHEREK, TO RECEIVE THE MINUTES
OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION OF AUGUST 19, 1986.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, C13AIRPERSON BILLINGS DECUIRED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
12. flECEIVE APPEALS COPII•ffSSION MINUTES OF AUG[JST 26, 1986:
MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MEt. SVANDA, TO RECEIVE THE MINUTES
OF THE APPEALS CONAffSSION OF AUGUST 26, 198b.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECIs�RED THE
MOTLON CARRIED UNANIhSOUSLY,
13. RECEIVE HUPt�N RESOURCES COMPIISSIOn MINUTES OF SEPTEPISER G, 1986:
DfOTION BY MS. SHEREK, SECONDED BY rIIt, SA&1, TO RECENE THE MINUTES
OF THE HUP1�1N RESOURCES COMhfISSION OF SEPTEMBER 4, 1986.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CH.4IRPERSON SILLLINGS DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
14. RECEIVE INFORMAL PARKS & RECREATION COrA1ISSI0N hIINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 8,
1986:
T10TION BY hYt, BETZOLD, SECONDED BY M[t. SVANpA, TO RECEIVE THE MI23UTES
OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COPQIISSION OF SEPTEMSER 8, 1986.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VQTING AYE, GHAIRPERSOr BILLINGS DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY,
15. RECEIVE AppEALS COM[�ffSSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 16, 1986:
MOTZOh BY M2. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO RECEIVE THE MINUTES
OF THE APPEALS COMDffSSION OF SEPTEMBER 16, 1986.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECI.ARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIhiOUSLY,
16. OTHER BUSINESS:
A, COMMISSIO\ STRUCTURE:
Dh'. Robinson stated two proposals have been prepared by staff regarding
op[ions on the City's Commission structure. He stated P1an A involves
eliminating the Community Development Commission and having a six member
Planning Commission. He stated the Chairperson would be appointed by
the Mayor and would vote only to break a tie.
Mr. Robinson stated P1an B eliminates the Community Development Com-
mission and combines the Environmental Quality Commission and Energy
Commission. He stated this pla❑ provides for a five member
Planning Commission with the Chairperson appointed by the Mayor.
0
Mr. Robinson stated these proposals have been�formally approved b�•
City Council, the Commission ma}°, �if they so desire, make
a recommendation to Council.
Mr. BiLlings stated he had discussion with several Council members
regarding combining the Community Developmevt Commission with the
PLanning Commission. He felt this was not their intent, but rather
to have these members serve on other City commissions.
Mr. Billings felt if the Commission was to recommend P1an A, the
question on how many members they wouLd need for a quorum, if the
Chairperson isn't able to vote, should be addressed.
MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO RECOMMEND TO CTTY
COUNCIL THE ACCEPTANCE OF PLAN A AS SUBMITTED BY STAFF,
UFON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECIARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
B. CODE CFL4NGE REGARDING PARKING OF VEHICLES THAT ARE FOR SALE:
hh. Robinson stated the Council considered an amendment to the City
Code to prohibit persons from parking cars on side or front �ards for the
principal purpose of sellin� them. He stated the City Attorney felt there would b
problem with determining that the principal purpose was for the sale
of these vehicles.
I�h, Robinson stated staff is reviewing this matter with the City
Attorney's office.
C. HARD SURFACE DRIVEldAYS:
The Commission discussed if thete had bee❑ problems recently of persons
obtaining special use permits and not complying with the stipulation
for a hard surface driveway.
Nh. Robinson stated staff would check further to see if this is a
current problem.
D. VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY:
I�h. Billings stated in c8ses where the City owns right-of-way and a
property owner wishes it vacated, many municipalities charge for this
property based on the square footage. He aLso stated many cities will
not vacate unless adjoining property owners agree to purchase the
vacated property. hh. Billings stated this is something staff may
wish to check further to determine how adjacent communities are
handling these situations.
Mr. Robinson stated this could be an agenda item for the Commission's
second meeting in October.
PUINNING COI�Aff SSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 24 1986 PAGE 15
ADJOURNMENT :
MOTION BY MR, BETZOLD, SECONDED BY hIIt, SABA, TO ADJOURN THE rff,ETING. UPON A
VOICE VOT6, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECIARED THE SEPTEPfBER 24,
1986� PIANNING COhAfISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:05 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
-��!• , ��c ��l�j,= �
Carole Haddad
Recording Secretary
CITY pF FRIDLEr
� FAIDLEY �MN SI�Tb;32E. N.E, gpEC1At USE PERMIT SP �Sto-�lo
(812)b71-84b0
SPECIAL USE PERNQT FEE 217U REC£IPP #�` �••t6�
9�lEI�(JLID PLANNII� WtM'IISSI0�1 l+�TII�X; I�1TE: ''r �
9Q�1FS(lLID CITY QJUtJCII. I��TING II*iTE:
PROPERTY INFORMATION
•.��• �..•�.
LS;AL I�S�tIPPION:
I,OT BI.00RC �2AC'1'/ADDTTIIk] `
PRFSfNT ZCA�ItJ;; t� ` { AQ2Fl+�E
•7�� � �� •• r,�
srxrior� oF �e m�: ��b 5. ��. 1� G i L
.�.*.�*..*.«**,�...*...,�..x*.**..**«�.**.*.
OWNER INFORMATION
rur� r/ �� �
rwrRFSS __����
sicr�azvxe ��
.�*.*�*..*
*.*.,�*,�.**.�..
PETITIONER INFORMATION
�r� �
a�u�FSS _
sicrmzuxE
a .,.� 7/ - �f �,
�nA� �°/l��
*.**..**.*.**.
�. . 's
,. ,
.**�*:***.«*...*.:**«.�:*.�*,���***,�**.****
: :.�, �,.
QTY fX7f]NCIL:
STIAJLATIONS:
n3:et.,�a.�
_•::�. a�
��y .�.,
� �� ���
n��
L14TE
JEFF GELDEP,T
L.S, #86-07
STI PULATI OPIS
1� LOT AREA VARIANCE TO �,`�OO SC�UARE FEET FOR PROPOSED LOT W1TH
EXISTING HOUSE TO BE APPROVED WITH SPLIT,
2. LOT WIDTH VARIANCE FROM 75 FEET TO ± 64�5�1 FEET FOR BOTH LOTS
TO BE APPROVED WITH SPLIT�
3� SETBACK AVERAGING RE(lU1REMENT WITH HOUSE TO SOUTH�6ZH3 CENTRAL
AVENUE, TO BE WAIVED WITH SPLIT; BASED ON LONG RANGE PLAN FOR
AREA�
4� DRAINAGE REDUIREMENTS FOR NEW LOT TO BE APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER�
5� PARK FEE OF �750��� TO BE PAID WITH BUILDING PERMIT�
6. RECORD SPLIT AT ANOKA COUNTY WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF COUNCIL APPROVAL�
� � � <�
`� �%`�� �� - �- '' � -� �
19,
�o. 4.
r�0
Ig ��' �g
1� pF,�,yfr 5,
P�,n�
18 V�yf �'C� SA � 6,
. pROVI
q�E
�F DE A
TyF q8 �ETTE 7.
D�
SVFF f ST�
CHRISr� sQN �T�RA�F
:'Ya Mp R�pAI R c
MOR� RF Tyq z, v
TNAN�N��A
CqRS RS
_ �<<dk
' �1 >� ` �.-e
��—"�-«,',� -�`.
8.
O�
10.
<
�<, �" ��° . �
,/!
�-, �°I3���
ROP�ALD CHRISTENSON
OF P„ T.C, AUTOMOTIVE
SP #36-13
ST I PULAT I OPfS
INSTALL LANDSCAPING AS PER CtTY PLAN DAtED 9IZ�iI$C INCLUDING
SODDING, PLANTING AND EDGING AND ROCK MULCH WITH WEED BARRIER FOR
EACH SHRUB BED BY 10/31/86, f���---
PROVIDE AUTdMATIC LA4:N S°RINKLING FOR ALL GREEN AREAS BY 10/31/8E,�
PROVIDE E��� CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER AROUND ALL HARD SURFACE AND 4
DRIVEWAY OPENINGS, AS PER �1TY PLAN DATEII 9IZ4I$� BY ],OI31IS6. �¢� �
CURB OPENINGS TO BE MODIFIED TO COMPLY WITH CITY PIAN DATED 9/24/86
sv 10/31/86. -�� �
SEAL COAT AND STRIPE PARKING LOT AS PER CITY PLAN DATED 9/24/86 BY
10/31/86. �� � ,
PROVIDE HARDSURFACE DRIVE4JAY5 IO� INTd STORAGE YARD ON NORTH AND
SOUTN AS PER CITY PLAN DATED 3/24I�6 BY 10/3�./86. � ?--°- �
� i i /.
6 � f ��,�. ,, , ,
PROVIDE g FOOT HIfN 50LID WOOD FENCE ANp,� ATES��TERIA� AND STYLE��
TO BE APPROVED BY CITY} AS PER CITY PLAN DATED 9/24/86 sv 10/31/86 �
ALL REFUSE AND WASTE MATERIAL SHALL BE STORED iK DUMPSTERS TO BE f
�..
LOCATED INSIDE STORAGE RREA IMMEDIATELY. �__
ALL MATERIALS INCLUDIN6 IN�PERABLE VEHICLES SHALL BE STORED
STORAGE YARD, BELOW TOP QF FENCE IMMEDIATELY.
REMOVE OR RELOCATE T� CENTER OF 5T4RAGE YARD TNE BLUE GR�
TRAILER IN STORA6E YARD. ��- �' �"''""�� � °
�_
✓
c
b�
�
;
�= -
i
i�
CHURCH OP! THE �OVE
SP #,�86-16
STIPULATIOP�S
l, I�LL EXISTING HARDSURFACE AREAS TO BE IMPROVED WITH SEALCOATING,
CURB AND GUTTER AND STRIPING; IMPROVEMENT DATE 70 BE REVIEWED
IN ONE YEAR�
2� AN APPROVED DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE TO BE INSTALLED BY 10131186,
3. REMOVE OR REPAJR DETERIORATING PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT BY 10/31186,
4, COMBINE INDIVIDUAL �OTS INTO ONE TAX PARCEL,AS REQUESTED BY CITY
ASSESSOR PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL�
S, PROVIDE FOR AND RECORD AT ANOKA COUNTY A PARKIN6 USE EASEMENT WITH
TOTINO-GRACE HI6H, fOR USE OF TOTINQ`S PARKING LOT iOFF �ARDENA
AVENUE) ON SUNDAYS, =� �"`�'��'"' `� �`�' � � '°� "'�' `�'�
6. SPECIAL «SE PERMIT #86-16�FOR �HURCH USES�IS TO BE COTERMINOUS
IN DURATION W1TH PARKING USE AGREEMENT; EXCEPT WHERE INSTALLATIOPJ
OF NEW PARKING ON-51TE WOULD SUFFICE,
�, SPECIAL USE PERMIT #�36-16 IS ISSUED FOR CHURCH ON THE MOVE ONLY,
$� SPECIA� USE PERMIT #�86-16 DOES NOT COVER ANY NEW CONSTRUCTIDN�
9� A�S,O�Q BOND TO COVER ITEMS 1-4 TO BE ISSUED 70 THE CITY BY
10/21/8E,
10
lt�
t2-
SPECIAL LiSE PERMIT �'g6-IG TO BE REVIEWED PR[OR TO EXPIRATION OF
PARKING AGREEMENT OR IN ONE YEAR; WHiCHEVER CJJME�S FIRST, a
.j� n �. L
� � (Y"%.0 �G Y.'�( �V / / � rJ -_.--� �,..�
`� y � �i iln .`'� � � � " �/'��l �� ��'=' � ` � '.!f �`��— 1-
�,�, �._��.
��
6� � ���
� �-�- �. � � '_ /.�. � . . . � . .
e- � �r.�- ,., �� � � _ � f "
�
_
;
.C: � � ' ,/�./
�. ,�t3�����
� ,,
�
ROPaALD CHRISTENSON
OF P,,T,C, AUTOMOTIVE
SP #36-13
STIPULATIOPlS
2C
1� INSTALL LANDSCAPING AS PER �ITY PLAN DATED 9/24/86 INCLUDING
SODDING, PLANTING AND EDGING AND ROCK MULCH WITH WEED BARRIER fOR
EACH SHRUB BED BY 10/31/86. ��
Z� PROVIDE AUTOMATIC LAb'N S�RINKLING FOR ALL GREEN AREAS BY 10/31/8E,��
3, PROVIDE 6�� CONCR£TE CURB AND GUTiER AROUND ALL HARD SURFACE AND �
DRIVEWAY OPENINGS, AS PER CITY PLAN DATED 9I2�4/HFi BY 10/31/86� �— —
4� CURB OPENINGS TO BE MODIFIED TO COMPLY WITH CITY PLAN DATED 9/24186
Bv 10/31/86. �-- �
5. SEAL COAT AND STRIPE PARKING LOT AS PER CITY PLAN DATED 9/24/86 BY
1��>1�86, -�" C� ,
E, PROVIDE HARDSURFACE DRIVEI+IAYS IO' INTO STORAGE YARD ON NORTH AND
SOUTH AS PER CITY PtAN DATED �/2UJ�6 BY 10/3?186� �_ z�-- -
6,� �, � , .., -� '�
��' ���,�___ ���' ��.,. , . . ° _� 'r,.�. i
�� PROVIDE H F00T HICH SOLID WOOD FENCE AND� ATE . MATERIAL AND STYLE l
TO BE APPROVED BY �ITY) AS PER �ITY PLAN DATED 9/24/86 BY 10/31/86 � J
7
����j
H. ALL REFUSE AND WASTE MATERIAL SHALL BE STORED IN DUMPSTERS TO BE I
LOCATED INSIDE STORAGE AREA IMME➢IATELY. '� j� I
�, ALL MATERIALS INCLUDING INOPERABLE VEHICLES SHALL BE STORED INSIDE
STORAGE YARD, BELDW TOP OF FENCE IMMEDIATELY� —�— ��
IO� REMOVE OR RELOCATE TO CENTER OF S70RAGE YARD THE BLUE GREEN
TRAILER IN STORAGE YARD� d�- /'�`� �—�-�-� �— � _ •
. °' C :
RONALD CHRISTENSON
R.T.C. AUTOMOTIVE
SP �86-13
11. REMOVE ALL VEHICLES INTENDED FOR SALES OR LEADING IMMEDIATELY.
SPECIAL USE PERMIT �86-13 IS FOR AUTO REPAIR ONLY; NO SALES
OR LEASIN6 OF VEHICLES IS OR WILL BE PERMITTED ON THIS SITE,
I2. REMOVE TRUCK BODY PARTS FROM ROOF OF BUILDING 3MMEDIATELY�
13� REPAINT BUILDING FACADE AND 7RIM TO COMPLIMENT BRICK COLOR BY
10/31/86,
14
15,
SUBMIT TO AND PAY FOR AN INDEPENDENT SOIL TEST]NG TO DEtERMINE
EXTENT OF S�IL CONTAMINATI�N BY IIII��H��
PROVIDE REMEDIAL SOIL WORK AS INDICATED BY TESTING BY 6/1/���
2�
16, 1�0 ON 'STREET PARKING OF VEHICLES SERVICED OR WAITING TO RE SERVICED
IS PERMITTED.
iJ, PRQVIDE A C1TY APPROYED SIGN WHICH DOES NOT INCLUDE MENT]ON OF
VEHICLE SALES OR LEASING,
IH, PROVIDE A LETTER OF CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $IO,OOO TO COVE�
OF THE ABOVE STI PULAT IONS � �� � ��� ���� �"S�z �' �
�
I9� SUFFICIENT STORAGE YARD pREA FOR 1� CARS TO BE DESIGNATED FOR
CHRISTENSON REPAIR GARAGE IN LEASE AGREEMENT�
2"
ZO� �VO MQRE THAN � CARS ALLOWED IN STORACE YARD AT ONE TIME AND NO
MORE THAN J CARS ALLOWED IN FRONT LOT� �-ky� �--�I �`�- ��`J
�,..a r a-� �{� �-t � , � -., ��.-�--� .
f� �� ��
� S�� � �� ��� � �' �
� %' .,,�' ,t
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE TNE
PLANNING COMMISSION
Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning
Commission of the City of Fridley in tfie City Hall at 6431 University Avenue
Northeast on Wednesday, october 8, 1986 , in the Council Chamber at 7:3D
p.m. for the purpose of:
Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP #86-16, by
Church on the Move, International, per Section
205.07.1, C, 2 of the Fridley City Code, to alloa
a church and private school on Lots 2, 3, and 6, except
the South 200 feet thereof, Meloland Gardens, all located
in Section 24, T-30, R-24, Anoka County, D'linnesota, and
Ir�t 4, Meloland Gardens, located in Section 24, T-30,
R-24, Anoka County, Minnesota, and Lot 5, except for the
Westerly 110 feet of the Southerly 200 feet, Meloland
Gardens, located in Section 24, T-30, R-24, Anoka County,
Nlinnesota, and I,ot 1, except for the Southerly 210 feet,
P7eloland Gardens, located in Section 24, T-30, R-24, Anoka
County, Minnesota, and Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision No.
92, Anoka County, Minnesota, and Lot 33, Block 3, Moore
Lake Hills, Anoka County, r'linnesota, and Lot 1, and
Auditor's Subdivision No. 92, Lot 17, may be enc�u�ered
by a recreational lease runrLing in fawr of the City of
Fridley, the same being 1401 Gardena Avenue N.E.
Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the
above stated time and place,
STEVE SILLINGS
CHAIRMAN
PLANNING COMMISSION
Publish: September 22, 1986
September 29 , 19 66
lA
Church on the Move
SP #86-16
Naroid Swanson
6064 Woody Lane N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Kazimierz Tomczyk
6�60 Woody Lane N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
James Reiland
6068 Woody Lane N.E.
Fridley, M�; 55432
Leslie Wi1ke
6061 Central Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
David Sallman
6061 Woody Lane N.E.
Fridley, MtJ 55432
Thomas Flolid
6053 Woody Lane N.E.
Fridley, MP; 55432
Stanton Berg
6025 Gardena Lane N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Henry Olson
6015 Gardena Lane N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Roger Schultz
5991 Gardena Lane N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
George Bacon
1336 Hillcrest Drive N.E
Fridley, MN 55432
Walter Johnson
1334 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Michael Gannucci
1332 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Richdrd Modig
133D Hillcrest Drive N.E
Fridley, r�r� 55432
Planning 9/19/86 lB
Council
MAILING IIST
Joseph Hinytzke
1328 Hillcrest Drive N.E
Fridley, MN 55432
Richard Lindquist
1326 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Howard Bergman
1324 Hillcrest Drive N.E
Fridley, MN 55432
Ro6ert Knudson
1322 Hillcrest Drive N.E
Fridley, MiJ 55432
David Lucas
1320 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Arvid Hansen
1318 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, M�d 55432
William Donohue
1316 Hillcrest Drive N.E
Fridley, MN 55432
Michaei Roith
1314 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MI� 55432
fdward KaspsZak
1317 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Bron-Erick Incorporated
3231 Central Ave�ue K.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Thomas Duffy
6005 Gardena Circle N.E.
fridley, MP� 55432
Ralph Skovran
6003 Gardena Circle N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Donald Lewis
6001 Gardena Lane N.E.
Fridley, P1PJ 55432
Lonita Kilber
5951 Gardena Lane N.E.
Fridley, Mtd 55432
Faith Academy
14D1 Gardena Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MtJ 55432
Douglas Johnson
1495 Gardena Avenue P;.E.
Fridley, M"� 55432
School District 14 Richard Fren�h
6�00 West Moore Lake Drive P�.E.1469 Gardena Avenue PJ.E.
Fridley, M� 55432 fridley, Mt: 55432
Paul Tumms Dorothy Baxter
1310 Hillcrest Drive N.E. 1465 Gardena Avenue N.E.
fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, M�. 55G32
Paul Agnew
6069 Woody Lane tJ.E.
Fridley„ MN 55432
Robert Allie
1313 Hillcrest Drive h.E.
fridley, M�; 55432
Thomas Manning
13]5 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Frid7ey, MN 55432
Charles Croon
1437 Gardena Avenue fLE.
Fridley, Mid 55A32
Wayne Monson
1423 Gardena Avenue Pd.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Oean Johnson
1413 Gardena Avenue 1;.E.
Fridley, Mf; 55432
MAILING LIST
Church on the NAVe
SP #86-16
Leo Foco
1345 Gardena Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Richard Palmer
1329 Gardena Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Spencer Minear
1291 Gardena Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Herbert Murphy
1337 Gardena Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Eino Efraimson
5990 Oakwood Manor N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Charles Dorcas
5950 Oakwood Manor N.E.
fridley, MN 55432
Donovdn McGuire
5928 Oakwood Manor N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
James Gamble
5926 Oakwood Manor N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Gerald Burrow
5924 Oakwood Manor N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Stephen Shorma
5916 Oakwood Manor N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Steven Benson
5910 Oakwood Manor N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Stephen Dahlman
1499 Gardena Avenue N.E.
Fridley> MN 55432
Doicese of St. Paul
1350 Gardena Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
David Sallman
6Q61 Woody Lane N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Robert Baldauff
6045 Gardena Lane N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Jeffrey Hagen
5980 Gardena Lane N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Lawrence Larson
6035 Gardena Lane N.E.
fridley, MN 55432
Ki Han
1251 Gardena Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Richard Alexander
1281 Gardena Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Bailey Tiller
1535 Gardena Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Kenneth Baker
5925 Oakwood Manor N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Chester Burmis
5963 Oakwood Manor N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Janell Benson
5951 Oakwood Manor N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Church on the C1ove
9213 Webber Parkway
Minneapolis, PIId 55412
1C
/ ,. � �� � � .� �, � p,r i�� —�_ � P `p� i�,; + . .
� D
' .� �� � iJ � 6 /6 1'7 _ C
.. i �' 3 x . , i
,e, .. . Hl� � ,. , �� �,t, � . s
,•. �� " B- ,'_ CREST �pRIVE " �- :
�:_
� ..
n
l'r, �, � �A� i L�� �i� lJl � l� ` �1 r`r) . `� j../ * � .�S
/ `:, � 7 { i � p / _ ; , ___ "
s 9' L�,4= E' ., � j
. ..
.S C y � >Q �I'
.'. .�. .. ` V I�51 r•.. `�. +w . iY
Q _ , � � � ,�. �'1R) z� � , r ��i � O �,
.-. O� .a�•J V^1 \�� ;��,. ,,�� ��° ^'�� �d 7f �`.i� !r;� . ,p
. ' � � ` • � �
i �3 ; u i� - i
� 1 � ��� .. `�/ � � ' . `' ` !ep � y
� II � �1 • _ . • /In i ^'�a}�Q`` J;.Y'.. /`t
••� C�FST ' , •. w. N) �N) 4N� i' ' .,. ; �v' � � J ��
I. ' � . J �L. j .
i , ', 1
r.�! x� .�
, ' _ • �� ,�� �(�� � .
� . `I a � 5 .. .• fsl � t1 I � , .
�5�� J�: �f�l �.,� � � O � i
r
-. ;::H���::>:^ . _ a _ 1
:�s;.�::�::I. , . . . � �-- i
i::s:'>:::::t. , � . . ,. . � . .
:
, t
' T ':i i: s J a . . � I : , ,
�...+w�%=jN!�wy'yi�$yf <-:>..rif'. ' a,:i:fJ C
..� . SCxj �:��.L;.:(a�: ..5::' r..A :„,[j:'�.''.:i;.:�,!<'r..<i::iK::::.:_:is>;:�i�i'�.`:y:f::xrc�.ri•:5:::�u
.1: D� E33.'�s x"%a ui j �5 ���j%8KP ¢ ' a . � � ' .<'s;�i s � vc zi � � t � a ., �
� Sl `iaC��i>3i�Si< �5 'MJg.y+R2,�:.�c�>y� ? �`,`�0i� Wo.�t�:�y` �'.S�' f �� EX ���r; >>S> aQ5 f �` �
, .
c %�+SR <. `5�> x<�Sxo >5 3 �>y °�o� �r � '°'%ti�3 ��'Lh,r� �%ti:<3.x� a a'.�h', �� ?i .�,,''�rD <;;'c� <' � .. � ,��1: �
L •, ' � '•'•^r>,. q .
cs.. .:v: , � .
.3. ' `�. '� �..i►_
'�'ux...i`,>r.. �A.s.^,:>.� ::r�>... G.� ��., o¢ `.h`"d�c� :'?�
�. t .:.:;�F+:.._.:.. u`5'%.3��c D,<.�:.�'f,. '"�A. '�i'�n.i. ' � s...vO.''.c.,�...i. .iYC?E�:
' h a �' <' N.< � 3 t ? � .� �a�j�ty�@ 3 j �e'..� i >ci.. � �v � 0 _i�' � 1t9 � /.
�� c � D .' ( ���:.,� l�.
s s
', �3k5> i' . '� . s' o
� � Il ��r� i`� < w� 3 c�AF'f� f� � <,�> >.� % �, g � e ��1.\I �.' 1
,:. h n , .�<,. ><��.. « �"s . ,
- ,
.,
av�c 5... ,
„ ,. <::.;:,. <: :_: :.: , ...:: . r:_.
>:�:.
:<.:, :;ai ��:' :<.. �. > ,.:w.. ,,»:::.<. s :..s:i3:z><::`::: � o� �
� , ,,.::.: ,.. . � .
, 5 � s.r;:. £., r:.x .s?"
�::�:.: � �::..
.� .:.-::,:
o..::
.f,::. :.a..�,. ..> �y
� a ;:;<Z,...E.:... .:..�..: i:;` _.v.£�f%:::"'g'siG>:.,,'!. ;.n::::�
..�.i:: ...*3,:` :c.'$::>: >':Yv:::i 'f''� .o.�'�'" a .5,. !'?�:ii:;t'.:
, .. $:a. ::........v ..
:,L :..f.:�:'
.�
..$.. .�.::..: ..iQ
. .N. i3I`:):'�i:::`.i.: �;5�: .55�� . �'Y` a,p5,\>ii:::�±`.Y�i:� J
. � . <� .::: �>,.:. .• y� � ..0
� : :i':itin.�v.".'.3%�::.>:v ;i�...'�$i....:ry�'��::.�n. ."n� Y�qliY%i::::a.i...
..a�:�� v.F,,�. �£:.���J iRS�. ;':' VH.�<��ekK�i` ^%;Y`a';` f�fR, �:r 3s� . �
�,5 ' ,:.: ., i , . .5.. � ;>45y':,.'S:.r � �
�.. - � . �v:...< . •'. . ' r
..:�:.,: �:>. '�f..� ..;� . I ..
>
� . �, ;.:.., �
<. -'f.� ' , I�.
x£;*
1
.,w. '6?' � 3:' _ Y?3•:� ?.si.<; -3.�.`
`f ;
:p.';`���_�>�,:`.:YS :::3. �°.3ia.',�i�.`r'��i6 k;:'�g;�£`'4`.i>: fi=�... " �"i.':<...:... *�i?;� .
V � .D5°• ,�:5.<:..�.Fn�Tj ..��£�'3,c�� ;,.i: ;,s:'� `��`�i:"<'` s > f3;3.' h€>s, yf'�;:�,,:, ' s <.s< �� b1t��W" XF �• � �
�A � fi ' >��f;�2' �;;�`.^5f3<�:."�iri.'< , s . ": , �� �1 i�� � .
, .r.,. � �oo�, , D,S (rn � � "`�.�i r�a ��Sd 2J5 ! � . ; . .. r • �. �: i
� .. ' w�<��:.ta �i .`� . A7 O�) �' .ZZ - ,� :.j 5 �
D �Yi�'�:,�:; >k5ji :z�;V;j�:o�:SiY::,S:.':�'S� � rse B% � I
Z (�> II) y:.�..iY .. �A E' <5 _.. _ v /' _
.3.��,'�td` s2N� >A > - .�:..� ��Y�_� 4
�� �`Y'i...., f � � QCy 'A I � � � «
M.><`_Dy� #����'ti. 15.5: � � I1
�'N<` )».:�yJ�+i�:5si:
� .Ri. i°..h •.f:p: ^�.��' � ��3��v 'i�, �j i
• , v :.
' . .. �:..::�>:na ..:::.::4..>::n::: . . . � . ��. A
' -1/i!"r i. . . .:. Y 5.
_'_ - i•ml�.
� ���� �— ...i_�'"
�/.�OOI
� . •��� • �. ,
.r• • i•. 30
r
•. �+ (/,r4v�5' n C
W � a `�� ti
� � %9:0/ �
�
. � � � ��
� H/GH � � �-°
` �RACE �
' �� v
Qc �i
, _ ...
�
,r,, �,� �� ', �
� .
;� /� , .
�� ` -, . �..
a. � .
: LOCATION MAP � �
45
� ��a��
; . : :.:
...� '�'�` , e; _� �
� ::7,.=.... ,p .���at
� �, � : � :� � ::::::w::: � aAO�- ��
•�•�'�'� • r � iiiiiwi� •� . �� `
��+���� ,,,. . ..� ' r � eeee:::i�' r 0=
........... =
�������� - . � i+,+i?'+ �� C����tr��� ` �� .
�' � ��o��������.� ■
�������►� ' ��i+�' � / • • � �V
i��� ul1 . rs.na � �
�a��e
a�_o � �. - . � �-�-�'� .
ri�+�i•�� p� � � w�������1
r���• �'�
y,� :i �.� I������
r.�_� �. �W► •
' � � � • ,� � � ♦ ^>�1�, ����� � . • �p:�vl�l
� ♦���♦ •4<;���� 1�. .
♦�i�♦ �
�� �t������������ ♦ / e'!:�i.�.�♦�� , / � � j�'�5,::
r �♦ •����������►: � ���• ��,�����q � �
I � �•� ��•�•�♦�•�•�•�♦�♦�♦� ` f � �•► �'�y � O � " 1 r� '0�1� �r
.�: �.�+�.�.�.��������� • ��,11����������, . I � '• V� w � :7JiN
�� �.�.�♦�♦��������f� .:��t����.�A_�_�. .� �p�Q�w1r.7'�y��� �
.��.�J�� ♦�♦ �
. �.�.►,� � • r.��• a:a�!'� 4 � �.t��AY?�� 0
'•��:. �i'�i�,.�♦ p�Q�� y� �, �,
♦�����'�'�;� . ►• ♦�♦ � s �
I���������������y�(� j�4R►������ � � � •
......_..,. - ...... q�.�%m '�o� : •.. .� ; .
♦���♦ .�♦ ,i��• ���
i����.,.����c���♦
•����.�����►���♦ . . � �
[i � � ��s...�����������!������� tOv�v� ��
r�-�-�- � Ei
li•��� �'�► �'� ������ ��,,� �•�•�•' �
�� • > ���.�+���� ����� ��q�� �������v • i • ���� a�
�►�����e�.►���♦ �:� �
V.Lr�♦'-�����
�..�..... �„
�.:�� �� g ■
� �!' �.. • : .
� ��� � �
0 Ao � :::,:-
. �O �,� � � =�ir-
��°,.�l1�'� ����c�
�' � �
��� .�:� _
, . - ' �����_
�
..N �a��� ,..
�
...:� �.. •'�. `. �9
. � �' ` �
�` � ' '�'" M►' * � �
* t* . ''�� ��•,� � '• `
� � ` .• �
••. � 0 1
�� � - �0���..
,- �o �.�.
� �� -a
�
. .� ,� ,,.
,. .
.:. ,
,•- ��. � ,. .., . �-
.��i.�, ,E `� `� �r
.v"� , � .
� -t�n�, /
�� �������v� �'��'���
Ir O
��
- :�0 � � � • ,�. '��'�:�4�!!���. -�.
� 3 2 �� A ) �
t�'roea 1: 9 a �p�►L $ • „'��,, , , „ ' ' 'r z ,
DkivE �s � 5 �� '
' i �F ,� � H � 'z �
� � �y = � - � e AD��O'IV' z . - � 5 ' e '
ll�'£N ,:; ;: t ' "..�.;"�±eRTH� ��.�� ;, F ` . < < I ^oq
., .
� �
i ���
: +�'�.Y
+r-�,'IN
d�li� �
� �i` b[ s'+ �.:• y� F . .' —..
�V �L.. �.� •���+ ". �k � : ,j`
{nM1- � ` '�'�!�1 �t+?��''r K�,�y,. �" �.��l�l '
��} �a � � ���:
:.`r�3' �.; .�,ti , f,f.�.•� . � � r, � . �
` 'Y a+��+.''�r ` ` .��'�
; � - '"� y � �j,'.� `r �� ; �;�.;
�.
:., •,. �.. - t �� "...��f.��:,� E��.:i;. � � � ?Mi' .,�"'!?. 4pii's,�,. • �1�h{^�. r'
• . � _ { � � � I 4 S 'ii �� � � � �� `�ai.' . . _y, • T : �,. {
'r '' -rt' ','�`.- � ... �t ;� ;, t �
,
_ , � >..._. � � , .. �� ht -y - -
�� s 1TI"� `V � �,'�.f ' . '�n`, .N •" '# �•�.r Y:� i,
`� � ` '; .� . .. . � � � y.},� ' . � v . . _ . ,� ,.. r. .
f • .' �� . . '� • a . t . i _ � % +� � f ��y , - �
ti' �i. t
} L� �F b��' T�v ^�_
� n, ., ,-
" r �d FqiTH ` ;��. fl �•�.__
� <�
„� ,� GA-D C Y✓�`1 S t TE ., �
,. • . . � r,
., � � . �:, • i w „h �.
�' ' �': �il.F'°
.� ... ° �.,�.,: _
� ; �v — • � .
,.t '. ♦ �� . . , . . . ... ..
... ` ,�/ yl P � *a�)y'1 S '�� � � jN. '' � M� �`Y. j' I .�.�. , ����R f{
• •4� , � � � )f _P � N L � ^ � ` ; h � x: • _ 6,,, '
_ ^�' -...�,-� �,4 :.,a,! � � _ r- , �-� ;�� �� � ' � .1„b t
.,�i" ;;s�" ',+n, • � - .a; , . .� �,�, �.� . :� . y
- - GRRDENA , - EFV - � .
- +� ` En?ut . � �'
- _ �= . __ _. _ � _,; Y;, ' � - ,,;,;�. :F{ r �.., ��,
� \ .. .�L` � � - . .' . • r • • , . , . '��+tt
^�~.. ' � .--_�` . : . . j __ ^^ `, ' ,y■�� ' . „(� � , r �
�Di ~[ � .� ' � "� ` ��� • � _..iiY: � . �, - ' � r � 1
y �� , ' � � _ , l ���� j - �
j J. ; � �
rfP! I� i a i . . � - S' . ' �� � �• � .i �k l � �.. .. S �
-� �`f . � ' ��' _�_. ,,� _ ' •_' �'
� ' r' _, f r ; ..a _- � ` �'� •.in' �� � -"1
� ; �
ti � -. � �y � r
�� ..� �r.i, w -•� � •�,i'ir, . � • r .1�::. 6' Pli
f•
� P � �' � � � � f _ t . 1.. � ... 1 �,? �`.
r'� i
"'-� . .a _ � I � . . � , � M . �
i: � tT� -' � i,
� � � * .� �.�.� �'� �
o ' � '+; � '- � � � . � --�<r ,._ � � �
+ ' �ro=
_ � �: � / ' � . � „� ,:. _ , •�
��� � . Y��_�.:r� � �� ! 711 1_ i . �,.m . „j, -� �r �.
� `_� �
a � r � .. � ' .. � ' � � ks.�.
�°�► _.+...-, ... - _' `, i ' .� . ,�r }, , ,a i �, %
A �'
, � r�„° � i
� t , r r:�:: '�� " . ` >,���
p�' . � � /� . . d �� �' � n! . lnl <
� .e� 'r7a:�
.r. :;�^, '�'.. t . .
� � . 'y ,
� �
v� r �",�- "n ,-
,,yM
��
r4
" - �.
.`
� '"
n�: _i� ��
{ ��
f ,y .
". . ;Ff �� '` �,«.
�l
.!a � ...1*C
., , ,+?-' : a�'
1 « P.�
�� ' � �l � � 1.��~ .
%�x . ..- f. , .
�
�
��
�M
Nark E.Anderson
ienio� Pasler
icott Norling
'asm�
Eric Hanson
foutn Pasmr
<aren Anderson
)uec�or o1
Nomen's Miniscries
Kenneth Maxwell
JireCtor o11n6tIWte
Melody Norling
Executive Secretary
Lynn Torguson
DireGtor ol Musc
_ Church On The 1V[ov -
i
Atfiliate of Church on the Move, International •4213 Webber Parkway Minneapolis, MN 55412 (672/ 588-0548
October 1, 1986
Dear Commission Members,
I am writing this letter at Jim Robinson's request to outline
our planned function at Faith Academy.
We desire to operate thc school as it has been; a private
interdenominational K- 12 school. In order for this to be possi-
ble, we need to have double use of the property, conducting church
services at the property on Sundays. This is the only viable way
we can sustain the school financially, as history has already pro-
ven.
We have 600 members in our congregation, with many from the
fridley area. The Sunday a.m. service will run approximately 300
in attendance, and Sunday p.m. will run about 150. We have made
contractual arrangements with Totino - Grace for use of their
parking at these times. They have more than adequate parking to
meet any requirment we might have, and they are very open to help-
ing.
We have already met with the nei9hbors and shared our plans
for the school and property. We exchanged ideas and expressed our
desire to work with them as much as possible. They were gracious
and we had a positive meeting. It is our plan to continue this
open communicatio� with them in the future.
We have already made significant improvements in the opera-
tions of the school and care of the property (i.e. grass care,
building maintainance, traffic flow, etc.).
If there are any questions, please feel free to call at 588-
0548.
Sincerely,
/ ��/ i;
- �!�L;1, Z" . U_� � r c ,. < <-
Mark E. Anderson
President
Church on the Move, 1nt'l.
� CITY OF FR�OLEY ��, �� •vv 2
_ f IOLEY �MN Sb6432E. N.E. SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP ��8�-J�
(d12)bT1-S�bO
seecu+�. vsE �r:�rsr �'�,�o o x�aeiPr ��/ 9 4 p
s�mor,m �n� o�rn�ussnxl t�er� nATe: `T Z�I �l}�
9Q3IDULID CITY Q�f7NCIL MEETING II4TE: _IQi1pJ�.LQ—
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Ato�tTSt r,nutFSS S7S� 'L�, � c/ /� L, �%7. �. �r;�/�L./ l�1 i h n. SSy3 e'�-
I.H;AL DESSQ2IPfTON:
I,pT ��� g[,pQ( � 'Il2AQ'/ADDITIDi�] Cl� L11 �J
PFtESIIdT ZONING —� A�tFI�fE
SPECUaL USE PERMIT BEING APH,IED FDR:
SFXTION �' ZiiF. �DE:
: • : * • * • x * • � � : t * * • • � • * • t * ,� • t : a * * • : • * • • * • * * •
O�IVNER IMf�F�RAA
��
ADIRE55 --�1�:--
SIGNA'IURE
a ?�l� �'a�°
*•••••/••::•*•*••�••••*••:•�:t•••*•*••**+*
PETITIONER INFORMATION ��-i, Lj'�'�_L/�ya,
r�r� �?�,a �� �r, � h ri's�.��s� �, x�a�E � 6/�--S�I-n�6
.►•• �._
sicru�v�
.:..*..,�:*,�t:�:.*****x,�*.*****.:*�**.***.*
. � � .. . :•. �� ��� ��. .� �
« .. . ••. �. .� .r. ..
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning
Commission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue
Northeast on Wednesday, September 24,. 1986> in the Council Chamber at 7:30
p.m. for the purpose of:
Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP #86-13,
by Ronald Christensen of R.T.C. Automotive, per
Section 205.14.1, C, 9 of the Fridley City Code,
to allow a repair garage on Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block
3, City View, the same being 5755 University
Avenue N.E.
Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall 6e given an opportunity at the
above stated time and place,
STEVE BILLINGS
CHAIRMAN
PLANNING COMMISSION
Publish: September 8, 1986
September 15, 1986
2A
MAILING LIST
SP #86-13
5755 University Avenue N.E.
Frank Gabrelcik
5740 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
The Graves Co.
5701 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Ed Flaherty
10495 Olympic Circle
Eden Prairie, MN 55394
Grace Mathisen
398 - 57th Place
Fridley, MN 55432
Ranko Schuur
5755 University Avenue N.E,
Fridley, MN 55432
Ronald Christensen
217 Canal Drive
Rockford, MN 55373
Richard Miller
7900 Timber Lake Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55433
Roger Beauregard
2650 - 15th Street
New Brighton, MN 55112
Beverly Mattson
10267 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Resident
5822 - 4th Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Lindy Lemieux
5812 - 4th Street Iv'.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Margaret Hendley
118 Craig Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Holiday Station Stores
Box 1224
Bloomington, MN 554§0
Planning Sept�mber 5, 198�8
Council
2C
ROP�ALD CHRISTENSON
OF P,,T,C, AUTOMOTIVE
SP #36-13
STIPULATIOPJS
1� INSTALL LANDSCAPING AS PER CITY PLAN DATED 9/24/86 INCLUDING
SODDING� PLANTING AND EDGING AND ROCK MULCH WITH WEED BARRIER FOR
EACH SHRUB BED BY 10/31/86,
Z� PROVIDE AUTOM.ATIC LAY:N S°RINKLING FOR ALL GREEN AREAS BY �O�31IHE.
3. PROVIDE 6" C�NCRETE CURB AND GUTTER AROUND ALL HARD SURFACE AND
DRIVEWAY OPENINGS, AS PER CITY PLAN DATED JiZ�1JgG BY 10/31/86�
4� CURB OPENINGS TO BE MODIFIED TO COMPLY WITH CITY PLAN DATED 9/24/86
av 10/31/86,
5� SEAL COAT AND STRIPE PARKING LOT AS PER CITY PLAN DATED gl2y�g6 BY
1�/�1�86.
6� PROVIDE HARDSURFACE DRIVEWAYS lO� INTO STORAGE YARD ON NORTH AND
SOUTH AS PER �I7Y PLAN DATED �/24/�6 BY 1J/3?_l86,
%. PROVIDE H F00T HICH SOLID WOOD FENCE AND GATES �MATERIAL AND STYLE
TO BE APPROVED BY CITY) AS PER CITY PLAN DATED 9/24/86 BY 10/31/86,
H� ALL REFUSE AEVD WASTE MATERIAL SHALL BE STORED IN DUMPSTERS TO BE
LOCATED INSIDE STORAGE AREA IMMEDIATELY,
�, ALL MATERIALS INCLUDINf INOPERABLE VEHICLES SHALL BE ST�RED INSIBE
STORAGE YARD, BELOW TOP OF FENCE IMMEDIATELY.
1D, REMOVE OR RELOCATE TO CENTER OF STORAGE YARD THE BLUE GREEN
TRAILER 3N STORAGE YARD�
2�
RONALD CHRISTENSON
R.T.C� AUTOMOTIVE
SP �86-13
I1. REMOVE ALL VEHICLES INTENDED FOR SALES OR LEADING IMMEDIATELY.
SPECIAL USE PERMIT �86-13 IS F�R AUTO REPAIR ONLY; NO SALES
OR LEASING OF VEHICLES IS OR WILL BE PERMITTED ON THIS S1TE�
12� REMOVE TRUCK BODY PARTS FROM ROOF OF BUILDING IMMEDIATELY,
13, REPAINT BUILDING FACADE AND TRIM TO COMPLIMENT BRICK COLOR BY
10/31/86.
l4. SUBMIT TO AND PAY FOR AN INDEPENDENT SOIL TESTING TO AETERMINE
EXTENT OF SOIL CONTAMINATION BY 11/14/86,
15. PROVIDE REMEDIAL SOIL WORK AS INDICATED BY TESTING BY 6/1/37,
16� ��0 ON -STREET PARKING OF VEHICLES SERVICED OR WAITING TO RE SERVICED
IS PERMITTED�
1%. PROVIDE A CITY APPROVED SIGN WHICH DOES N�T INCLUDE MEN7I�N �F
VEHICLE SALES OR LEASING,
IH, PROVIDE A LETTER OF CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $IO,OOO TO COVER ALL
OF THE ABOVE 5TIPULATIONS.
I9� SUFFICIENT STORAGE LAN➢ AREA FaR IZ CARS TO BE DESIGNATED FOR
CHRISTENSON REPAIR GARAGE IN LEASE AGREEMENT�
4i
Z
F-
N
AVENUE
N
�
N
.� 6=
� -�
Z z v
`9 4
/B�
� /� i,
tA i�
N.E.
2 6`-
4€29
�
y^z�
a �`'�F7
M � (H)1' F
�F
�-
�:��
Gozi
�>z� .
/9
i?0j;6
/
{�/
AVENUE #E.s
II /le � / �{
. n) °c ; Y � ? /o
♦
y 2 !m? ; � ' 9 A"%
t �'� , '
.3 �� : �i
i{I18 /A r
� �����
23
)!f y1 S � _ —
f�. �i 4�i�/F
t
�/y./ �
��J,� ` - - h s i:
' D i�fi � � i7
' �9 :C/,� /Z/ �/4
:�� ^�� .
J IiOI.
• ��
� ,
3
Z ; 23
�
,
a
I o ; ��81
.N R, =�
�00�
�,,,�
�aci
gGS)� '
�
� Id�i
'^� . �-� Q ,5; o ( ' � '
� �1� � �
.T W a ti,` ; E
� Z '�- � 'Z
b�. y �
� � ,p �6 � � � �,; ; , , ,.
: ��, ° i�st
� � �1�/S �y� � � � i O � "�
N � N ...�
.�
.n,. w �� ��? ; ; a:g ° n
� /¢ � .., ,� �
3 l,yti� sf a '�.". .n U.
., (a�'3 . �)E ti ..: ' •E ' » ..,.
f�e�l� R � a " � ,ir -
:... �" � ��%Z • �°�� � Z � 5 i� ,_
. � �"
� ' /lff4 � . •• '
..s�r ; .Illia) . , �` ^ _� ��
. 1 '•�e' f9��' a, A�, -
�' 5 � . E'�`� : ° �s..
,iv,.ri:nn � c 59 TH �V
nf � - h
t�r�
'� � P�
atYi-�u 'ft�
� ,4`, i( �
�, � ta
—,tf - .
� ,,y � c:�
��
� ��
�� htib.�z ° ¢lya,
'v / �� ..e
, i _ : 'S,+�..
h�� 6
;z
7
�F `�� ' l�, �
��.. ..
is�� L�'> 2
,. �
�`,/� � � �, 3
„;� L, 4<
!3y/� ���
.
//!�`�� �ti,�E
, aF:
/���'�, (f� 7
.�
."' 9''" . 5° P
6G �� s -'+ ._��1� 6< �1i .�:..5 1 iaf
„�� �N.—E.��
A . .
YL' i b.� �.F, �l � ;' ' �
�! 2 3�f _ 7 B ia ,/! �`� ,
� -'�f� �
0
: . r
� is � �
.,
4 . 4 �?',
; /� �i.
�zis�' (
/� ���
^ � �Y�.
4 9 '�
.,o jI
�,��9��PLACE
:., „
. .. . . 1 �af) ;s� m � l �, � �
� � 1�j n� ..a'J �rIQ YHj � o .
� v� Z 3° 5 6 � �J fl IZ / /¢ / `/ Z 3 4 5�
!��t_, � _��. .. . �, i `, / :
.-._ _ �
- G7 TL wVC\II IC _ -' -`
"�T'TrT--7oCTL�V� . .v �OepJ1�
r--� r-� j---� r
24
LOCATlON MAP
�C
il� !l.etC�,•,i!\�
� � ��� � �.. ��f
�
��S �w ,� ...: �1 . :'�1
1�:1�'f �c,a:, .x,rl,,,- -
..�.�.- . - +'�..���....� '� � � ..f .-,.
_ T r�l.
• r ; ,* ,
.- ,
�' ,�y a .i�� � � �,
, .,. .� f
� .. , �� .
. ' T �
� r1 i' � �%4 ��
� �• � _ 4'y � � .1 �
~, `.. � . - -� . - ��, '
�.
� -� �, � {'� =
- J �:
� /� '£
,f
_ ` .
y �
. R /v ' K `��'l
/} 1 � �a
�_ L - !� .. �h��� ,�
SP #86-13
R.T.C. Autamtive
a �^,.� .,� a•� r1'R'1'•' ►R� ?t f 1
< < ,�
�� �N�� ��:.: �. ;� . .��
�' d � � �� ' ,y � '
Y �1. y� ,� �t � � {
, F '�:�. � �''�. 'C :'-T � _� �
-` � "• r � `� �'. . � .. , _11r+�'
: � 6 _ i � � � # � �� �l�
P lt?4
' , �{�s ��,�
'''� �I . . r.. � � � � *������U'.;' � ` ..
. .�� / ��,�,, y �� ._ �����i
� • i ` �.� ' � `,�'.: � �,i�jf •'d �c r� a"t r,.
��E�'. -5 ^�..y� �i. � ,-i � ���'� -.
r � � � �� _� .� t'� s.
: ✓ � - � � �: ,}� i .�� , � � _ � `� j.. , .
� - "'- . . ... �-e .. .."rr"' � � ...._
� �r.,act�....,.wy.a� :• � __ . -� T � n� '
v'• r; ", � f' � ' '�� , ' � �' `i�
�, t i � �
i ��,.
P��Sh� �
�� . , �
��, G �
� � . IT
� f5 � r '' �+�
y ip
.3 r��'� ��� ��: �
.e �
� ��
_r
,� .. y � �
�„�^� i!y�' ";����� � �',�'T,.
� ��-� ` `�� ��'.� �' �► .
� , ��,� � ~. ' ,!� �^
k � '���',.�3r_ r -�� r �� � �
� � �,^�-i ���� �i ' —j t
�. � ; � �� ., , � , � —�
� ,
� '�'.,�,�.. , •� �. ��
z �K �
``� � -F t
•�.��y% ;Ti� i' <" yx � °�� • ���
.;'�� -.,-.� - � r. �� . -r . • �
� d � 2�1 �, � ' y f
p I'I + � ?�F . .v� � _i ,�-. '._.5..�_ � E,.
`J �T 'i_,_ �. �� . .
i�
F M� a�` , �� �, .�
� t R . ,�� � � � �-:�''� ��—}
- � �. -.,� 7,, ..
k #a `�''�! . � x*w
�` ,� —�, �4 �<�
., � --. ' - ���
�� �,�, .... \ 1...c:.:4;,'. 1�� _! �
:�•s3=��---a,. '��r;-�_ .°�
�
���"�
_ --- —_�.__._,.__:.�_
S y� c. i r� t_ li :c NE,�n� ri" '� S C- i 3
.�75s U��i �'ci�s rTy f�-�lE..
L�f �r� : 1�,5�1"!.S s�.�.
�ld�, Ar�c�. : .�oSH 5q. �f.
� Cav�t : �� , y dlo
��iY�c] ��41U�✓� . ��'1 STq�lj
cr �
�
_ _ 41�. _
�
_ _ .—�_
_; ,
�7 �12 �VEvl�e,
,zo-
r------------�
� !
�_. I
�, I
I',
T
_,
t
, �
S_'_ �_
�
i
. �-
;� 4:
�
ti s
�
i �
..
�
i
I
<
I
i
— y5 �
V
4b
�°
�
�
ro
�
�
;
i ��
I j
� — — — — — — — J
5 7+�, P i 0.�.�.
S.
�
� `�
2H
C
Z
�
�
�
�
a
�
�
�
�
�
�
1
�,
r�
�
�
r• -n V
� s
;��, o
r �,
_r*c -
: "'( �
\ ,
o .�
`�� --t
z o
.z __
L
c c
�
�
�
�
a
4
/ FJ �
i T
il� �
v
I� ,`
�'a
1�
�
�
A ��
F
��
� I
����I
Y
SP #86-13
R.T.C. Autorrotive
At�O��Q
R�`��q° �m
.,z mizv+
$c aC..
z
m � �aZ
�v � V'r�
� r u
m � S
O � C
r
AU�� m
� L �
�
t L C
n �
t �_
G �`
, S
�• -t - - __ -_.� ..
�
N
� ��y$
+�. 1
' S Ppp�
!� S �r � Q
� � .r.� o
� z �n �
zv�g"
r �
\. S �
z
�� � m
K '`
� � I�\.�
� Z 1 C
� � � , I°
� � �: -.
,�� � � I � I�I y
�� Y � I �
i
�r % � � o
�
�/�. I � � i
��
I
�
�
A
�
r
_
�
I�
�
�z
�
c
b
O
0
<
� ��
0
I��
�
l= m
� �
A �
a A
3 P
N I
��
Z �
L '
i
o J
� � I
p a I
L
` h I
� £ � I
b � C �
v ,
P I
C
� I
x o�
G i �� � I
a
�z c i �
=i�
T o
U i T �
i i
T
I� �
�'� � I I II
� r/ �_ �
� " \�:
`�,.,.,�Y ,s= 1
a
Z
�.
r
t
7
c
i
2I
�,�"' -ti:
�
..;;,�:«:r...::si
_ _�
i
!
. -
Qi
...�..
�
�
�—�- - V � � � . ,� a— i
.. • �.. .��
r , :� �„p��:,: -
� , ..
�.._ . .
.,<; � ; �y �,a��x .,,r.
,�,,,..�,_ � . _ ..
_ <.
- --_.-_ :� `-, :..
t"
,.� ��'
� ;, ;u �
,�� -
- ' . . -��`', } � '; �
�,y�y w..
y�
S�f`„ a ta.�t' , �: L. I�
� . . _ .._r 1�.
... . , ., . -� V °.
� CITY OF FRIDLEY
6431 UNIVERSITY AYE. N.E.
e FRIDLEY, MN 55432
` (612)571-3460 •
3
LOT SPLIT FORM L.S. � �� --C,�
LOT SPLTT FEE � PARK FEE RE�IPi' #���3a
SQiIDULID PLANNNING Q�D4IISSION MEETIt�G I1�1TE: 'l � :
SQ-IIDULID CITY �CTNCIL ME�,'PING IY�TE: /r /,?----C ��—
� .
PROPERTY INFORMATION
aDra�FSS: � l�l l �c� �'1'��r� � F-t l,� l� ��
LF�AL DESQtIPPI0I�:LF� /7 �zce,p-� 5��-h SS ��i- -��reo�-� A„�,`�i�,,s swbA,v�sc�
(luMbe� zZ �no� Co�y v�th.
LOT f % ffi,p(I( 1gACi'/ADDITIDN
x:FSfrrr aaa�c �E.S-� -c;1�l�a
REASOf� FOR LOT SPLTT: A sketch c� the propezty and the proposed lot split with an�
existing structures shaan should acoanpany this apglication.
* � * • • * • * • r * • • * r � • • • * • * * • ,r * * • • : ,� * * • * * • * * + ,r �
OWNER INFORMATION
�� -�c�=C: ��� 1�c� e ��- ��E � S7 � - �� � I 1 c�,
.��•a,,
, a I 1-� �/ I�; F
IYiTE �' � � - 'S C��
* * * r � ,� • ;t * • r � * � * • : ,t * • ,c * * * * * ,r � * ,c * * • * * • * * * * * •
PETITIONER INFQRMATION
NAP'IE
ADII2FSS
SIGNF�URE
PIICd�E
* * it i� tk • * at i� tk f 4 ! k t 7� ! f tR * * # * * * • 1� * * * * R �k ik * * * ic # ic * �k
• 1 � �� � "• if �]� �01� �'
Q�' Qx�i�cu. :
SfIFULATIDNS:
... �. . � ��. . •
�'<,
�
CI�iY OF
FR{DLEY
3A
CIVIC Cf:tiTk,K •[,-131 UNIVFRSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEI'. A1INNESOTA 55432 • PHONE 1612) 571-3-i>0
Septeirber 22, 1986
TO WHOM TT MAY C013CERN :
The Platuiing Comaission of the City of Fridley will be holding an informal
hearing on a lot split, L.S. �86-07, by Jeff Geldert, on Wednesday, October
8, 1986 in the Council Chamber at Fridley City Hall at 6431 University Avenue
N.E. at 7:30 p.m.
This r�uest will split off the Westerly 140 feet of Lot 17, except the South
55.0 feet thereof, Auditor's Sulx3ivision Vo. 22, the same being 6291 Central
Avenue N.E.
If you would like to be heard on this request, you shall be given the opportunity
at the above stated time and place.
STEVE BILLINGS
CHAIRNIAN
PI.IINNING C�AiISSION
MAILING LIST
L.S. #86-07
Jeff Geldert
Ziebart o£ Minnesota
6300 Central Avenue N.E,
Fridley, MN 55932
Max Saliternian
25 University SE
Nlinneapolis, MN 55414
Richard Mochinski
7256 E Comnerce Circle
Fridley, MN 55432
Rice Creelc Properties
1315 Rice Creek Road
Fridley, MN 55432
Ervin Kassaa
1400 Rice Creek Road N,E.
Fridley, MD? 55432
Dorothy Miles
1370 Rice Creek Rc>ad N,E,
Fridley, MN 55432
Jeffexy Geldert
6291 Central Avenue N,E.
Fridley, NL^I 55432
Gregory Stenhoff
6283 Central Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MIQ 55432
Richard Hartfiel
6271 Central Avenue N.E.
Fridley, NI�7 55432
Harold Morgan
6245 Central Avenue N.E.
FYidley, NIN 55432
Planning 9/22/86 3B
Council
�.r� c� o�,.i...,: . ,�, �i�� °� � �i � 1 ,3C
�,,� � � ,.::�.:. ,. �
k W g I�¢1 a � � _ a
. ' .ae � iss r
, _ 1 a ��N �IN/f-fe6 � V - 4TH .�VE. N
9 ��' y a c ('%� �H�QI�IA� s.ro .n � « /sr ur .1s , .
; «... � (!�) � �'> ` � (w) (�)
oI�`l `. , N �: � li� fv (3lof J�
p lR' y � � l�� fi Z \ �l ��3T0� �lp�l, i/120f �NO% (►�'� /��
(�� iiLK4'
I,. �} �
!� p � , ^ �� , 3� j V'� � a /" '"%�"' � / '�
au,ao �AVV� ��, . , �,�� ' ; ��� �1 w,�� � �
. p ! � . fN7 fM - ,
o ; � .rev-.M-r»: o : • I
���1 � ��' • w � +h, ii��` ���p) "' '" _
o � /� K.f ' Ys�f �+ii e�
, C E
' ° �� � a(r) ; _.�� _--T�
� . `� ,r.v.�v-Nr j ` (K) �,� , (�f)
♦ � � ���3, � s '�"'•,•p , , o /�f�`ISOO) G3IOJ /r6lJl � ea� (iiooJ
pCE F , , , �,>
��+'� . r � a` sM,T a i4 " /✓ Ef
� ���y'" SJ , " � _. _.< �,�� -
: �. T '�+ -- '
�, • _ _ a /9 " `
� : "� . ` �is4oi '-- --- -- —
�� /4 � � O 5�) ' �{d+° '• 1��> a sr zs .0 ' ' .
'1 /f : � ,r.N�d/'Lr � '_ •°�.�� i
R0� 1 C' �,_. •. � �-__ ^ . .
� � s fjf �° J• x
� ''Z�!' p�G� � �� !t.'1�? �Q � C�tl � .� f�[
. f, V i �,
. ' `„ r�,.� U� \ ,
bO." �� �� � I �J� � il� �%
/' r �'
� ; ._ ... � 1�ooJ �Ll I i r%NDI � �2/�c�% N YO65� ,
h �h' � ti . � O�r��,4'r.�.a+� � � I (6 � � J �n �e�:f �M iH
(1y, . .Cn/I Jo � ww>�/ a< 4
� ti , I I .n 6a1,
, � ( i �
" � � /77 �» I I ` p '. f .
-�'s, � ; � Hiro�/.KfiYonnv -
' ""�'�' `� ' ' N A ` .oa�`
, .
� ,.{ � ,
' x` ; cn , ��i ' ��
, � : _ AUD `�� � � �h� � �� ,�
�. . E ,.. • ` f
CO �
r" (�4 J ' 20" �2�p5' :�' 1� e
`�; h) ,.,. - _ SUB. ,�, c(�e�,
'.i" .�e �LOt. B - �e.�s. ..., ,,. .. PB
�zoo� '�rHEAT E "`+ °`„• A R
: .,,. � ' ;� ,.I , � , ��ii �
��N) Cf w h N l'Po) 5 ;y ➢ f` ._� �f �
;- _ i' � �� � �,�� �,�� ` r.,, �o�:t �'n ,��
� i i� q P t�( /)f/ Sr1A iY � . .
� ; ' 2���'Z� ��� ~ `6��f; �� �.e�nd ': (��� � ��'T� r. '
�'�q. 8 8 f s � I I
P�� K�. j ��� �� °� 9� , ��56 t
' i !�� 3�') a'4/ 7�d j:i'Y��B �S C
: �71; ..,,�Ti�...A'{ , r
a ... l ,
� NOO fHM M/� .11 ...1/O..
Mo/ � ',
, 5a �.. . u, � �{Ug `' f �j �i� � .
' � r.i���re _ 2 3 MQ
—�--I}in: v�. m „r, E ���
� . !q '+6 a . tl � � � � s � �� � ��.
� �dA/J%
h �5 y � w000Y u,, �P.:,��: . �A� �, �: ��
. '.�,
��) � . h6 � . �0 Bo �d r: � .
�MI'. ' �-v . "' i-R_ __'4s � " 1aB �y� �/�
�/�!�p, • n ti0 ! I` f 1��� �'� Y i!/) �e:y.- .._� p�� . p � IN. LG '
�%il:�%� � 0 P Q 0 � � � a `5 � - 4' 3 � �� ' � � � " p �
�'�. " ; _... 1� __.
' �� ��` \ a � ATION MAP
� /tfrls4. (12IOJ% e�� �� 7 P
�-
' . �, s . /3 ;�l/ L 1 _
.
* � :�::��j�i+i�j �lti�fi�il�� ������ ��
* e ;;°�,1!�1 IIf,fH �
1;�1 u,.0
r � ::,.,�i ,::: v
'� ,. .. : : � e:: ';i j :::� ,.�s
, � eeee��l�ili . �%ee� 'Q�
> : � � ��ee�►.1.1.1. ;e:E.. ������� � `�0
. � .. - .. ��'��'�i DO
i - � • � ..
' ♦ %" ;,,�'�7' iii � 1 �
i�\7�7 `i :::�;
I - e...�i �����
���� . � ' ` •�N � � ��
� : ., - ...., �......
� � ....-...... .1'
....=.�..... •r:��,�
�'�'�'r'�'�-� ' � ...........
�j �� �`������ � �i: .r aY • � ,. ' � iiiiiw'° �
♦ ♦ q � r � • T���'�� �oori
♦ �1���♦ •......
.. .. �.. �►.�R�, � e .......� oA
x '' ....�,....
ijp ��� � � ♦ '+t+�. : �� Co.��.M..■ � V
Ea ��;�o�i�i° � - . � � . • . . � .
.4 �! iiii r � ♦����j . � r�ao 0
• « • � ��,�,�,�� �
�1r���N��! S : i � � � � .
� � � � �' � � � �������� �[sf'-�
� ���������� / � O�t i���1�� �1 �I•'0�
� . e ♦ �� �������������� � 'r�i ��������� / I ' � �J.
�� �. ♦1��������1� i,������� ��i�f ��
♦ ��f♦ ��►��������1� �♦♦���• ����:
. ♦��������♦ ����N�'�v �.� �
��� ��� •1�►������♦ ♦1����♦ �r r� �;�
1 ����f�♦ � ♦��������� .�A���♦ J�� • / i• � i
♦�������• • 1 r��.���,�. O �r0 w
LJ �.� �.�������L�j� � ♦ � ♦ ,
.4"�l������ s� ,S �v�T1J�• `
����� ♦4�4�♦ r.i�l• i:�' 1
♦������'�"��i1►a�1♦ ���� i w -
,� 1������♦ l��Q��♦ • 1� � �s'
..,.,.,.,.,.,.�:�:.�.,.►,.,.,.,. p�o�� � 4�� ;a �
..... •.�. .�... � .
i�����r.����t���♦ �''.
�♦����.►���. r���♦ s
i����..�����•���♦ ��� � �-:
�.�.��•�.�����v���� 0'."
r•..�,���• .«���• a� �� '�
,� �P����►�v��i��s��� �
— � M����,����, ����� ��.►�� ����.•�
` y�'L'•.♦`•'♦_,••••♦..♦. � , , , ' � .
� •���ar se9�°
� �. .�� : , ..
e �
0� :,;,
Om �p �� � ,.
��°�/�� � �
� . ��; • �
��O ��
. � .��o�������l� .
„`• �I,. .�. I� I
. .
f� - ; .^,. � •..-. �..�
,� � � ..
. �� • � � �,
� * ��'.' • � .
..
i � �a , �
, ,� '0
s
.�
, ` �'�°�
:.
�- .. .,, .
�_. �
.,`� -e '� o
` � •°� � �
,� :;�n��� � � ♦ �
.' �
_ �''►�C . , :"���
U
h
U
�
�
" ULP C-ENT�c�iL � _
3E
sFta
3
C
a
0
c`
H
z,
�
''"l
—,-.
^` i
-r,
�
/�
�
Q
'i�1 7N�rv- , � r .- . .
r�l.r�;{"`��� , . ' '' � , .. ,
�a Y: � •
.T �. �, . �`-� : �.:A.� /ii+r� SX1.��. � � 7 ..... ,_'_ -.. _
�� .^. � lb' �J �-�/ � � � , I 4 � ... i� `' � '
0
� I.F�A v � �,,,��.. J_ ,.. _
`�� � n C' *I1 .
� � O O �i. +.��. �..�. .��.... _ .
.. �� ^. � c" � ..
i ,' a -
�_
A o a �
O y �
�`.� + - T/ �
`T '�i O� . �' .. '
. �i
µ � `..
0. s ° t,
� -e ���� . .:� � .
p o ,
r4•��,�`—_� ,�i� C � ,.
'�� n.° ..-� � . � , � .
.' � ^ � ry . i � � � .
:A�'..ao [;) `� \ . . . .
o � `
<:Z r. a-
' ,er,� 5�.� .,. M1 .. . . . . . i �.,..,, . .
� s o � ��
l
. ��
a � �' i
' ^ ti�
. s e � � � � � . � � . .. .
{ �' �: \
. e ` M. ' � . . .
p t
�. �� �� � ; � . .
T �
I �. � � fY � \' .. � . '. .
's ,:� e �.,� . � .
��, ti
��y ( �, ;
,c• ;��; � �
�:� i�
„ .�, .. � :
. . . . . . . et„_... . .r.;any 1 ... ......s.. .�w�>,� .. �
_ C. .t. '
' [� Lf (y . Ll: '�l i
n � �'a j
. ,:� � .!
s.I _6 1 ..
-L � 1
� .� ,
:.
; �„
j`� _i:..
�. ,
� : `,
� �'; 1
[i. � � i
,,,
`: I ;�>;
` r���.,';.f ��
` ` � '.
� � : �. .
� � .
�.� `�J ��
� � �.: I 1 •
<i� :, � '
.t�'f,'�:�� " � "
� 1 �. '.
� _�� ::. � � � , �
.1
+ ' �
y ` � � � t.
7 �
� � .
�� '�\t-� ,_:
I C� �
� , y� _ �i �,�
I � \
, •z
.i
.,
;
/�
r-
av.__ __.____r-_-
1 � '�
Y �
Ill�r r.\
�l . i
_ .9 , 1� \
�o r �
h
\I
.��—.+�-�-�..��•
f O �
s
ns� W
�;,�v ;�8
���n�- ZOAm
�� ' N
�; � r Y L Z Z�
I,_IN�> T',�u.O
�r � � 6j Y � ,y
t 9 Q� O�� a
V C
I C' I� G O ��� T
. n w2
-+ �T� z�
�i ( 1 r
_ �
.; '
r
ui i
', �
jo. n
�- , �-,.
+ i:
` <.:..
1 1
� y f
� � y
� � � f Awz � o
_" m . �
�i : ' � ; o� . . �
a e O
� � <° �1 e'
C 1�
I t'� � ; b'�
�'' � � � +d
rv„_,T�-,.�E «�e ��� �m
.,�..�. ,,_ �,...,,� _ g. p � � . .e ,,
�� L � ;. Q � �..
;) ' . • Q � � ^C �i
i r--•
,t>_, �°p;�y�a
; �
t rr ,� •+ ° on �i
" i . . ��,. � . �K �
y�i
�- i i�6 a z
�-. -� � �• , - u '0 4 �
� ��� �- r �� �
____ _ ._�.`' � � __.r____�_._�._�.._
�.' i? ,
('
` ` I
�, ; �
, `�\ _
i
1 o�i��'�,ir.. r
'� o
1. \_�. I. '�..
0.i � ' - f �
� (° �.� � j I
, I ��, Y _n � �
� �� �.
.> � �� � 6 �-. � � i
- � —. ---�' „' ---_ _� i�„
+ ^ , � 1 . . � • .
.. . .
,±p
r.>� �
� rs
����r�
�: � -u�
� �� �
m
i O
1 m . f
' N
A 'r
n
�' ��
•
?�O�
�'�T
����v�m
W2L2
7.
�
�p'9'p , : , fi
��� � ��� �
r!ti ." + ¢y��'
1 : 1 � ��. ' !: �
� ] �.. iM . 1 �.�}
� ... l �' J � I �
�� � � �� � � ��� � .
!
� ` I � � i��.: s1'��
'�.l - J� 1.-'L'•�' ' I' � . 'aC; J��Ji
�.r � Y�.I�� e��i.yy�.�� �!`, ��
'�.t' . l� -. _ 4 :.� � . � .:jb�
� . � � . iy�..
� -Af°R' �.�hi ��� ' ` $ f .. .�� ':
r {
� i � 'f � 1
0 '�� j �' � �%tf�FVr �fy . . y
' �, � � `� ;i,±g.
•,
�� � � `': r � ." y .. � .
L H + ���
) � :� �i �,. i ' 9�
'� �"`�= � - `.�� � ' �.�; �
A�Y ' � �'r.w .: '9 'f �:J 3 i 1 a
� � �°�� /i�•. r �1e' a � ,-.r.� . 9 'S . �a i;'7,`�,1 yg+Rt
"�!�.p�M' -�i'/`'.� ���,�+�'' ,�Y �v!�d�k� �a��ij � � � f .. ��.�1 4�,.
� '���� '��.��},.�y �._�. � .A � . . ���
�<' ' , �(�'�'" ' / rt .:'4'+.� � � ��.` s ,p, , . ;'"°',7N�Y
�� '° �' �.. E I �;5
_ . � .. � � �S '. .t F � � x , � � � � l � i "a']
� �4 t ,j�'
� - -k � � � � . . . *.
� r• a. ;<; . V=� . .;._.. � . K . .. ` 3"
't , S �r?t _ � �+
-.a '
�
�. �. , rX" a��/ �:. � ��� �
.r b �.I'�"" � �:. -. �,. ,,.. � ='�
�� �,.y,i .: . � .'. .�'� v- .. . �
N ,,.. . r. ' . , . .
> . ,q , ( u'
� Y l
v n r
��� /F . e . � "� �i,'�v A
> ;"9� ♦ .,` '
s � , ,��
`�`� r�
� � ,
��,: . f,,; ✓ r�., �� ,.
�� � ;
C,�, d � r� li �
4,,�� _ °^/ ' _��a } t �
. �w � ���`�i`' y' y � s , � .. ��• �
w�:� . r� ��'�
` s�9 .
��` r ` n{ . ' . . � � i� .
� . . . � ..,� .�. . � ':� ° i' ,`�
t ' ' � � �,�•� �'�f � '"`�
a � � : �;� �'.�� �` .. ��,�,��TF`!s �:. ' ��
, �.. � ;:f..` �;:' ��,i..K'�.ea4' �"'��!'��ai
� > �' c �` F ? 9� 'r:s -�.' � � ' ��
� �,w, ' � . ��,. . �� �� ,
.N : -�� . ,. ,
�Ysi'� K�� �, -xt � .- ,;.* 1 .f`.
`�� r yyp °` .. � �.Y� .i1R' !x.
�s,t . � , yc _ ..
r s �'
r'iP/. N' �. `''^'." ' Y ' r�i
. fa � { rr" _ . . - . ' ; � 'e
, S � ' ,�,s. �. �.
J .ti � � "�l I
� r � , . �.
.r� I's� 4y��9 �, .� �q, J ;4 •.- �y �•�
� ��r ?S}C i ib� e� 1 f^ y� u..r.. �.
1 ..�Y ,� ' . � ..
✓.`r� f �w���x�k+x �, r��{ � .. �� ����. t'�.
��; �'' .�, + '�` ,.��� .
Y i ,����Y
�
1' j 'g�r�'yy*�' N*t , '�' ��p� :j: fi. ! ' .
• ~ { � i',A` ' '> i . 'y "�.t ^ +' aF � .� �
b �: d �il�., �.1r�' � .
� �X�/��i�j ♦, t ��G:'�`J��`� i . - y Y � � ..
�s, ��jt N�. d���p�T ` . � •�� .f.
} � � s
. ��� ��' '�'� . '.
. .��"`�►. - " - -
�, ; ..
,:;.
F ,A3 �
0. .,,.a +"g" � .
� . ��.
� "� � ,��
' � ,�..�..J�.< � • _
w � ,
� c �'�; '
��t� n �
, F.
�� �A'�" x,.
I b;� �•�� �'.
; 9 '.
, ( .}I
� � � �#�h� � ..
,� 4 `i,''.. j7
�.; a i'' .
�ri r rF
� , �.:y�"�.:: ... i �+i
" ���i:
' �.r�i�lll�I��` „p?� ,
a"
". i
(� f e •
�s3'�. :'�:� � .e..�...�
.� . �� ?��'�����
� 4Nrrm
��'�n�:
R� J k. .
�, f.� *4 � �J�
...srYt� t :.
?
i�r�, -• `. x.i'l.�
� ��� "4
I 'e�, �'�.
rt h
�4 �� � v'•
tt '�x +fi
C tt�.
.� �
� �� t
[ +�
w� �
` F
i
�
. .
� p � " '��
.� � ?, '. � � -
� '' ;
���
,�,
+�= ,
^ha.�`� �".WF .`�
i�_y eU
4 � ��}
�.°
� ��^ wt
�;.� i
x � :��� w `�
��
t� �� yC I :..y
fi � g�lr
� {jh +� €»
., 5 ������ . ..
. "�. i ..�� �:�
��
L "�
;� ����
h �
n4
e
�a
�;,:
.i
� �.�
..� ky�bNi' � v `.._����a�^�IF'
��
} # � �A�
z
*'�'jk -�.�`� ''�,? * �st" �� e
. p +x� � "`'Fr §.. „'
�_" w ;�
� `� �:
,�
=i
Y f
CITY OF FRIDLEY
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTNORITY MEETI�IG, SEPTEMBER 11, 1986
CALL T� ORDER:
Acting Chairperson Prairie caiTed the September 11, i986, Housing & Redevelopment
Authority r�eeting to order at 7:15 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
�4enbers Present: Duane Prairie, Virginia 5chnabel, Walter Rasmussen,
John Fleyer (arr. 7:55 p.m.)
�4enbers Absent: Larry Commers
Others Present: Nasim Qureshi, City Manaqer
Jock Robertson, HRA Executive Director
Dave Nevman, HRA Attorney
P,ick Pri6y1, Finance Director
Julie Burt, Asst. Finance Director
6ob Barnette, Councilman-at-Large
Ed Fttzpatrick, Councilman
Bob Levy, 100 S. 5th St.
Linda Fisher, Larkin, Hoffman, Daly E LTndgren
Sherrill Kuretich, Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindqren
Harry Yaffee
Ken 6elgaarde
APPROUAL OF AUGUST 14, 1986, HOUSIFJG & REDEVELOP�1FNT AUTHORITY MIP�UTES:
MOTION BY 1fS. SCHNABEL� SECONDED BY MR. RASMfISSEN� TO APPROVE THF. AUGUST 14� 2986,
HOi7SING & REDEVELOPMF,NT AUTHORITY MINUTES,
Ms. Schnabel stated that on page 8, third paragraph from the bottom, the first
sentence should be changed as follows: "Hs. Fisher stated what is proposed is a
353 unit apartment complex general]y located south of 85th Avenue, west of University
Avenue, north of 83rd Avenue, and east of Sprinqbrook Nature Center.''—
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, ACTZNG CHRIRPERSON PRAIRIE DECLARED TXE
MIIJUTES APPROFF,D AS AMENDED.
1. APPOINTItEWT OF VICE-CHAIR OF THE FRIDLEY HRA:
Acting Cl�airperson Prairie declared the nominations open for vice-chairperson.
Mr. Rasmussen nominated Virginia Schnabel for vice-chairperson.
Hearing no other nominations, Acting Chairperson Prairie declared the
nominations closed.
HOUSIP�G & REDEVELOP�IENT AUTHORITY �1EETINf SEPTEMBER 11 1986 PAGE 2
MOTION BY MR. RASMUSSEN� SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRIE� TO CAST A UNRNIMOUS
BALLOS FOR VIRGINIA SCNNRBEL AS VICE-CHRIRPERSON OF THE FRIDLEY HRA.
UPON A VDICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� ACTING CHAIRPERSON PRAZRIE DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
. . . . . . . . . . . ..... ._._ _ . . . .. . .
2. UPDATE ON NEGOTIATIONS FOR ACQUISITION OF THE RICE PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER:
�4r. Newman stated that Qob Levy has been a guest at the last 3-4 HRA meetings
representing the property owners of the Rice Plaza Shopping Center, He
stated that at the last meeting in August, the HRA had instructed Staff to
enter into negotiations with Mr. Levy for the purpose of trying to determine
a purchase price for the subject property,
t1r, tJewman stated that since the August meeting, Pir, Robertson and he had
met with the County Attorney to review the appraisal the County had prepared
on the property. The County Attorney had specifically requested that the
details of the appraisal not be disclosed; however, they can say that the
County's appraisal of the property plus the leasehold improvements was
approx. $975,OOD.
�4r. Ne�mian stated that when Staff inet with Mr. Levy on Aug. 29, Mr. Levy
shared with them an analysis he had prepared that stated the property was
worth between 51,050,000 and $1,150,000. �1r. Levy indicated that if the
property could be closed this year, there would be a tax benefit to his
clients and, as a result, they would have a greater flexibility in negotiations.
Mr. Nevanan stated he and 11r. Robertson had discussions with Mr. Levy again
that week; and Staff was prepared to recommend to the HRA, if the HRA wished
to purchase the property, a purchase price of $1,008,000. That was an increase
of approx, $32,000 over the County's appraisal and approx. $42,000 less than
the low end of Mr. Levy's market analysis. Staff felt that it was a fair
cornpronise between both parties. If the HRA decided to act on Staff's advice,
Mr. Levy had assured hin that he would strongly recommend this purchase
price to his clients. Although Ptr. Levy did not have his clients' specific
consent, he Felt it was very likely this purchase price would be acceptable
to his clients.
hir. Qureshi stated he wanted to emphasize to the HRA that in the past, the
HRA has taken the position not to acquire a property unless there was a
specific project for that property. Even though Mr. Robertson and Mr. Newman
had recommended a fair purchase price, this property was currently on the
City's books for tax purposes as having a market value of $562,000.
Mr. Qureshi stated there were some pros and cons the HRA should consider
before making a decision on whether or not io purchase the property.
HOUSIIJG & REDEVELOPPIENT AUTHORITY �1EETING, SEPTEMBER 11 1986 PAGE 3
PROS:
1. There was an agreeable price range between both parties.
2. There was a potential dollar savings if in the future the HRA wanted
to acquire the property and had to pay acquisition or condemnation costs,
relocation costs, etc.
3. They would have control of the property for future development.
CONS:
1. The IIRA would become tfie property manager, taking on all the advantages
and disadvantages of owning property.
2. The fIRA would become the tenant manager and would have the concerns of
paying taxes, mainta�ning the property, etc.
3. There would continue to be the uncertainty of the tenant situation.
4. If tlie NRA did acquire this property, they might be setting a precedent
for other properties that, in similar situations, might say, "why not us?"
Mr, Qureshi stated the HRA was in the process of pursuing a project on this
site. Because of some financial difficulties, there was some uncertainty as
to whether or not that project would go forward. They should know by the
end of September. Clear7y, if there was no project, that was something the
HRA should consider in their deliberations on whether or not to acquire the
property.
Mr. Qureshi stated that also at this time, P1r. Commers and Mr. Meyer were not
at the meeting, and the HRA should consider this ', be a very important issue.
F1r. Robertson stated he had spoken to Mr. Comme _arlier in the week. At
that time Mr. Cormers had pointed out the poss� �ty of not being able to
attend this meeting. F1r. Commers had stated i- s his own persona7 preference
that the Center City was the HRA's top priorit :�d personally, he was very
much in favor of this acquisition.
Mr. Rasmussen stated he did not think it was in the best interest of the f1RA
to own property without a prospective development. It was not a good precedent
to set.
Mr. tdevnnan stated there was great concern an the part of the property owners
that the transaction be done this tax year. In reviewing the leases, one of
the leases has four years remaining, three of the 7eases has three years
remaining, and two of the leases has two years remaining.
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTfIORITY PIEETING, SEPTEMBER 11, 1986 PAGE 4
Mr. Levy stated the circumstances his clients are dealing with were not
circumstances created by his clients. The HRA had created these circum-
stances. He stated he has appeared before the HRA for the last four months
expressing his clients' concerns. But, he can say that if this acquisition
does not go forward, his clients have asked him to file a law suit against
the HRA.
Mr. Levy stated the reason they are in this situation was because the HRA
has condu�ted itself in what they consider an unusual fashion. Typically,
when a City is looking at a potential development, there is always a certain
amount of time when things are up in the air before things are settled between
the existing property owner and the developer. The Mstory of this property
has been that for six years, the HRA has gone through 4-5 developers at
various stages of development with letters of intent, public hearings, etc.
It was a circumstance such as this that precipitated the acquisition of the
hardware store site. What was unique here was that every time things
settle down with a particular development and the HRA has terminated a contract
or terminated a relationship with a developer and the property owners feel
they can resume business as usual with their tenants, then there is a ne�r
proposal and a new deve]opment and the process starts all over again. They
lose pro5pective tenants or existing tenants, and they cannot negotiate for
market rental with new tenants.
Mr. Levy stated that regarding the hardware store, they had entered into a
verbal agreement to sign a lease for a new hardware store operator for that
site, but they have never wanted to run the risk of comnitting fraud with
a prospective tenant by signing a lease with that tenant without alerting
them of the possible development by the NRA, So, they always send prospective
tenants to City Hall to talk to City and HRA Staff. With the hardware store,
the prospective tenant was told the acquisition would take place within 30-6^
days; therefore, they lost their prospective tenant. In that case the fIRA
recognized the problem and went ahead with the acquisition.
�4r. Levy stated they had a similar situation recently. They had a vacancy.
They lost three prospective tenants because of the possibility of the HRA
taking the property. They ultimately entered into an arrangement with an
existing tenant to take the additional space, but who refused to sign more
than a nine month lease because of the threat of condemnation and who would
not sign a market rate lease.
Mr. Levy stated the direction given by his clients last winter o-ias that enou9h
was enough. They have tried to be understanding. They have been a member of
the business community since 1958. They worked with the HRA and the City last
winter with the Lundgren project which necessitated rezoning and plattin9 of
the property. They have tried to be a cooperative and understanding party.
Mr. Levy stated the HRA had a legitimate public purpose in maximizing the
utilization of this property and the development of the Center City site, but
that was a public purpose. It was not a private purpose of the existing
HOUSING & RE�EVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETIPIG, SEPTEh16ER 11 1986 PAGE 5
property owner and there were burdens and risks taht went with that. Those
burdens and risks needed to rest where the public purpose was, where the gain
and benefit was, not on the private property owner. In effect, for the last
5-6 years, the HRA has asked the private property owner to warehouse that
property and suffer the economic consequences. His clients will no longer
do that. They will either resolve this on a friendly basis with a negotiated
price or they will resolve it in the court room.
Mr. Levy stated that at the August HRA meeting, it was his understanding that
the HRA had unanimously authorized the Staff to enter into negotiations to
determine what would be a fair acquisition price, with the understanding that
a final decision on acquisition could not be made until there was a price on
the table. He stated they entered into these negotiations with Staff in good
faith predicated upon the understanding and assumption from the August meetin9
that a policy decision had been made.
Ms. Schnabel stated she did not think that was the intent of the HRA at that
meeting, Both she and Mr. Meyer had expressed their concern at the August
meeting about the HRA getting into the ownership of property. When they
suggested Staff talk about price, it was merely to see if there was any close-
ness in do77ar figures and that they wanted those figures brought back to the
HRA; but they had not made a firm commitment to purchase.
Mr. Levy stated that if this transaction did not close this year, they will
be talking about a different price. The tax laws change effective Jan. 1, 1987.
They will file an inverse condemnation suit against the HRA and it will not be
based on just the current value of the property; it will also be based on
the damages suffered because of lost principle because of the threat of con-
dernnation, and damage action for business libel involving statements made to
prospective tenants by staff inembers at City Hall.
�4r, Levy stated another alternative to consider by the HRA was that if the
HRA decided not to acquire the property, then the HRA should remove this
property from the redevelopment district and leave them alone.
t4r. Levy stated the Lundgren development had to be viewed separately and
d�tinctly from the possible acquisition. This made the decision more diffi-
cult for the HRA, but this was an independent issue because if the Lundgren
project does not go, the process wi1l just start over again with another
developer, Nis clients will not go through that process again.
(Mr. Meyer arrived at 7:55 p.m.)
Mr. Qureshi stated that regarding the Lundgren development, Mr. Lundgren
has approximately three weeks before coming to the HRA with a financiai corrmit-
ment. If he does have the financing corrmitment, it would put a whole different
emphasis on whether the HRA would want to acquire the property. Sut, unless
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, SEPTEhiBER 11 1986 PA6E 6
there is a specific project for the property, it was his recommendation
that it wou7d not be prudent for the HRA to acquire the property. He stated
the City Council v�as very sensitive to the City acquiring property unless
there was a project. He also thought the concerns and the problems of the
tenants should also be a major consideration in the decision.
Ms. Schnabel stated that if Mr. Lundgren is unable to get the financial
corrtnitment, what did �1r. Qureshi see as the climate for future developments?
Mr. Qureshi stated that with the new tax laws, in the near future it was
going to be much more difficult for bodies such as the HRA to have development
happen. What was happening was that a lot of the tools the fIRA has been usin9
and the developers have been using will be completely eliminated and adversely
modified to discourage development.
Ms. Schnabel stated her position had not changed since their last meeting.
She agreed with Mr, Rasmussen, She did not like the thought of the HRA
becoming owners of property unless they have a very specific development project
for that property.
t1r. Prairie stated the HRA did acquire the hardware building site, and they
were criticized for that action. They had a development comnitment which fell
through; and then they had problems with the tenants, so he could understand
not wanting the HRA to become a landlord again.
Mr. Meyer stated he did not want the HRA to be a landlord either, except that
there tias been a problem her for the last 5-6 years, That problem can be
�rought to court, and the HRA could lose. He was not as upset about not
becoming a landlord as he was about some of the other factors that were involved
in the acquisition.
Ms. Sclinabel stated she appreciated Mr. Levy's position and his clients'
position, She felt that if the HRA was to make a commitment at this meeting
to purchase the property and then found out in three weeks that Mr. Lundgren
was unable to proceed with his development, they would have made a long term
commitment to purchase a piece of property which appears to have had a history
of difficulty in being developed and which appears at this point to have a
very cloudy atmosphere for development in the future if Congress goes forward
with the tax legislation being talked about.
Ms. Schnabel staterf she asas nat totaily sure the HWt had even talked about
the conditions of the propsrty and whai woul+� be needed as far as maintenance,
etc. 5he just feiL strongly from a philosophical standpoint that it was not in
the best interest of the HRA as a public body to purchase private property
and ho:id i t.
Mr, Meyer stated he understood how Ms. Schnabel felt, but he also could under-
stand �1r. Levy's arguments in that the HRA did not have the right to ware-
house private property even though they have not done it intentionally.
HOUSIP�G & REDEVELOPPIENT AUTfiORITY PtEETING SEPTEM6ER 11 1986 PAGE 7
MOTION BY MR. PRRZRIE� SECONDED BY MR. RRSMUSSEN� SO TABLE THE DECISION ON
TNE ACQUZSITION OF THE RICE PLAZA SNOPPING CENTER PROPERTY UNTIL THE
OCTOBER HRA MEETING.
UPON A POICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAZRPERSON SCXNABEL DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY,
Mr. Levy stated it would be his recomnendation to his clients that they not
take any action pending the HRA's action next month. This would give the
HRA the opportunity to digest the information received at this meeting and,
hopefully, they can avoid a conflict that would not be in anyone's best
interest.
REPORT REGARDING CO�JTROL AND QUALITY OF DEVELOP�IENT OF THE LAKE POINTE
nn�n Tr r�Trn.
Mr. Qureshi stated that in the agenda was a memo he had written to the HRA,
Mayor (Jee, and City Council members dated Sept. 5, 1986. He stated the basic
purpose of writing this memo was to, hopefully, lay out some of the actions
the HRA, Planning Commission, and City Council have taken, specifically trying
to assure the quality of the development for Lake Pointe Corporate Center and
the f:ind of control the HRA by agreement can exercise and the kind of control
the City Council has by zoning and special use permits and other land develop-
ment requirements the City has.
t4r. Qureshi stated some concern was expressed by the HRA that they were seeing
pretty pictures of the development but what guarantee did they have that the
development would actually take place in that fashion and quality? lie stated
he had tried to provide the HRA with a summary of all the different actions
of approval the HRA had. It was his understanding that the HRA had full
authority on the basis of the agreements entered into with the developer;
and the City Council by its sheer police powers and zoning and platting powers
can demand this quality and type of development.
Mr, Qureshi stated he wanted to emphasize that the HRA and the City Council
can mutually agree to modify the type and the quality and the level of the
development in the future. They cannot foresee what the future economic
conditions or situations are going to be. He stated they do have a timetable
which tells them when this development has to take place. That was done
merely to hopefully give further assurance to the HRA and City Cour:cil that
they have gone through all these steps to guarantee this development and that
they do have a sizeable control over the development.
Mr. Qureshi stated the tentative date for groundbreaking was Oct. 14th at
around 4:00 p.m. He stated he would be giving the commissioners more
information about the program at a later date.
HOUSING E� REUEVELOP�•1E�JT AUTHORITY MEETING, SEPTEPIBER 11, 1986 PAG[ 8
4. CO�ISIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A CONTRACT WITfI SUNDE ENGINEERING
FOR EPJGItJEERING WORK ASSOCIATED WITH THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TO BE DONE
N THE AK POINTE CORPORATE CEtaTER PROJEC :
Mr. Robertson stated the specifics of the work are covered by Sunde Engineer-
ing. They have reviewed this with John Flora and his staff, and it was
Staff's recommendation that the HRA adopt this resolution. He wanted to point out
that in the resolution the amount had changed slightly from the proposal
received by Sunde in April. It was about y1,900 higher, That was as a
result of the multiple bidding of the first phase of the contract.
MOTZON BY MR. MEYER� SECONDED BY MR. RASDSUSSEN, TO APPROVE RESOLUTIOl7 NO.
HRA-IS 1986,
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CXAIRPERSON SCHNABEL DECLARED THE
M�ION CARRIED UNANZMOUSLY,
5. COt7SIDERATIOP� OF A RESOLUTION AME�dDING TIIE DESI6N AGREEMENT WITH S.E.H, fOR
100 WIN DRI E-I S IOJ:
Mr. Robertson stated that on the proposed resolution under "NOW, THEREFORE",
second line from the bottom, that even though the overall contract was for
West P1oore Lake Drive and Highaiay 65, they will see that it only includes the
preliminary plans for the Rice Creek Road improvements from Old Central to
Highway 65. He stated that in the right hand column under Rice Creek Road,
the "Detailed Plans" in the amount of $36,500, and the "Construction" in the
amount of $47,500 should be omitted from this resolution at this time and
it will be brought back at a future time for the HRA's consideration.
MOTION BY MR. RRSMUSSEN� SECONDED BY MR. MEYER� TO RPPROVE RESOLUTION NO.
HRA 16 19B6�"A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE DESIGN AGREEMENS FOR THE 200 TWIN
DRIVE-ZN ZNTERSECTION" WITH THE FOLIAWZNG OFIISSZON:
RICE CREEK ROAD
DETAILED PLANS S36�500,00
CONSTRUC220N 47,500,00
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CXAZRPERSON SCHNRBEL DECLARED THE
MOTION CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
6. COPISIDERATION C1F A f��SOLUTION AIJTHORIZIFJG THE EXECUTIOP� Of AN AGREEPIENT
MOTION BY MR. PRAIRIE� SECONDED BY MR. RASMUSSEN� TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO.
XRA 17 1986.
UPON A VOICE VOSE� RLL VOTING AYE� VZCE-CHRIRPERSON SCHNABEL DECLARED THF,
MOTION CARRZED UNANIMOUSLY
7. STATUS REPORT ��� UNIVERSITY A11EP�UE CORRIDOR TECHNICAL ADUISORY COPiMITTEE:
HOUSING & RE�EVELOPPIENT AUTHORITY PIEETING, SEPTEMBER 11, 1986 PAGE 9
tds. Schnabel stated the cost ranges that were included in the agenda were
included last month also. She stated they are going to have a preliminary
meeting with Barton-Aschman on Wed., Sept. 17. Several members of the
Technical Advisory Committee are going to review the preliminary proposals
with Barton-Aschman and then the proposals will be brought back to the full
comnittee the following week. She stated there would probably be nothing
to report until after the middle of October.
8. UPUATE Ot� THE WIP�fIEL� PROJECT:
Mr. Robertson stated Winfield Development was forming a new partnership
and would be obtaining the financing for their project in the Paco Industrial
Park under their new partnership name. 6ecause of the legalities involved
with IDB funding, it was necessary to putlish notice in the newspapers for
the nane change. The City Council wil7 approve the name change at their
Sept. 22 meeting. The name change was just a formality and would in no way
affect the funding of the IDB or the particulars of the Development Agreement.
9. UPDATE ON THE SHOREW�OD INN REP10DElING PROJECT:
Mr, Robertson stated the development agreement has been executed and signed
by Mr. Nicklow, Vice-President and co-owner of the Shorewood Inn. Mr. Nicklow
has assured Staff that the parking lot phase will start in September, A lot
of the interior work will be done during the winter, Dir. P�icklow understands
that the HRA's participation does not occur until the certificate of occupancy
is issued at the completion of the project.
10. UPDATE Ot� THE UNIVERSITY AVENUE APARTFIENT PROJECT:
Mr, qureshi stated that at the 7ast meeting, the HRA approved in concept an
outline for a 358-unit apartment complex on the property east of the Nature
Center and west of University Ave. The project would Ge: (1) a high quality
development acceptable to the HRA; (2) the HRA would provide 5850,000 write-
down on the land in the initial stages. The land actually would be paid back
to the HRA over a 15 yr, period with no interest for 3 years, interest for
2 years, and the rest amortized over 10 years; (3) taxable increment bonds
would be used for the project; (4) housing revenue bonds would be requested;
(5) the project would be under one ownership; and (6) there would be a good
north/south connector street between the P�ature Center and University Ave.
Mr. Qureshi stated the des«etopers have a similar project in Minnetonka
called Cliff, This deve7o�,nent will be modeled after that project except
they will have surface garages irts#ead of underground parking.
Mr. Quresiii stated the legal counsel for the deve]!�pers, Pis, fisher and
Ms. Kuretich, had written a letter to the City indicating that because of
potential changes in the laws, the project requires a higher level of equity
thant what was anticipated before, and they are asking for further assistance
from the HRA.
HOUSING & REDEUELOPPiENT AUTHORITY FIEETING, SEPTEMBER 11, 1986 PAGE 10
Mr. Qureshi stated the level of assistance authorized by the HRA was 5850,000,
and the developers are now requesting additional help. He stated that if the
HRR changed what they approved in concept, this wou7d be a departure from
the assistance they are providing for the Lundgren project.
Ms. Sherrill Kuretich stated she was an attorney �aith Larkin, Hoffman, Daly
and Lindgren, Ltd., and was representing the developers, 11r. Yaffee and
Ptr. Belgaarde. She stated the letter submitted by Ms. Fisher ancl herself
on Sept. 5, 1986, was quite explicit and quite conplicated, and she would
try to briefly surrmarize it.
�9s. Kuretich stated the last time they were before the HRA in August, they
were proposing that in addition to tax increment financing, they would be
asking for tax exempt housing revenue bonds to finance the project. Since
the Au9ust meeting, the Conference Comnittee of the U. S. House & Senate met
and issued the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Out of that report came a chanqe
in rent restrictions that will be imposed on tax exempt housing revenue bonds
for multi-family housing projects. Under the old law 20°� of the units had
to be set aside for persons whose income did not exceed 80% of the median.
Under the new law, the developer will have a choice. They can set aside 20%
of the units for persons with incomes that do not exceed 50% of the median
or they can set aside 40% of the units for persons whose incomes do not exceed
60°0 of the median. She stated they are proposing average rents of $585/month.
If they have to meet the 50% median requirement, that means 20°6 of their units
cannot rent for more than $438/month (2 bedroom). If they go to the 60`,0
median requirement, then 40% of the units cannot rent for more than $526/month
(2 bedroom). With average rents of $585 for one-two-three bedroom units, they
obviously are projecting rents far in excess of the restricted rents that would
be applicable for tax exempt financing. The rent question becomes very
important 6ecause the City of Fridley waslooking for a high quality, high
amenitive housing project.
Ms. Kuretich stated that in order for the developers to provide that level of
quality and level of amenities, those rents are necessary. The City does not
want a project of lesser quality with fewer amenities and the developer does
not want to build that type of project.
Ms. Kuretich stated the result of not being able to use housing revenue bonds
was that they will be looking at using taxable bonds instead of tax exempt
money. The interest rate on taxable bonds right now would be 1-1;q higher
than on talc exempt mos�ey. 7hat means the project will be able to eervice
less debt because the interest rate wili be krigfier. They estimate that
will be approximately $1 million less the developers can borrow and service
on a taxable hausing revenue bond. The net result was they are short about
$1 million on project costs.
Ms. Kuretich stated that in August they told the HRA they had approximately
$1.2 million in financial project costs due mainly to soil correction costs.
Now they are at $2.2 million because of the need for additional equiiy.
HOUSING & REOEVELOPI4ENT AUTHORITY hiEETING, SEPTEMBER 11 1986 PAGE 11
The developers are proposing to provide additional equity cash for one-half
of that �1 million gap or $50Q,000 and they are proposing to the HRA concept
approval that the HRA would lend the other $50�,000 to help make up that gap.
This would bring the total loan amount to $1,334,000 on the basis of the
increment projected to be produced by this project. She stated they did not
like having to come back to the HRA, but this was a situation they could
not have anticipated.
Mr, Qureshi stated he wanted to remind the HRA that they have taken the
position in the past that their highest priority was the Center City area.
He was advising the NRA that the concept they approved at the last meeting
was exactly the same as what they entered into with Mr, Lundgren, how these
developers are coming back asking for another $1/2 million of additional
help up front. He was sure there would be a certain level of impact if they
provide a higher level of assistance to this project than to the Lundgren
project, and it potentially put the Center City project at a slight disadvantage.
Mr. Lundgren was also faced with the same situation as this project was facing.
Mr. Meyer stated he would be concerned that the HRA would offer a higher level
of assistance to an apartment project outside the Center City area and that
the Lundgren project could conceiva6ly go under 6ecause of a lack of the same
level of assistance.
Mr, Yaffee stated that, as Ms. Kuretich had sai� �hey did not want to have
to come back before the HRA asking for additior,f <ssistance. They would
like the HRA to 7ook at their request and their � ange in circumstances.
They are willing to share the cost equally and still pay it back.
Ms. Kuretich stated that in terms of an actual risk of investment, the City
was not taking a risk like the deve]oper was. The deveioper loses their
equity if the project is not successful. The City will be paid back in the
form of real estate taxes. It was the second repayment they were talking
about and she felt that put the terms of risk to the City in a little
different light,
Ms. Schnabel asked Mr. Newman if he had any cortments.
Mr. Newman stated this was a procedure that has 6een followed quite often
(Lundgren project, Shorewood Inn project). As Ms. Kuretich had stated, it
was probably a lesser degree of assistance than what the HRA has provided
in other cases where they have given outright land write-down. 7hey are
using tax revenues to finance bonds, The NRA would be paid as saon as the
taxes were paid; and in addition, the deve]opers would be making payments
on the note. They could compare this with the Woodbridge project which was
the other extre�e where the HRA is providing several mil7ion dollars in
assistance.
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING SEPTEMBER 11 1986 PAGE 12
Mr. Qureshi stated that if the tiRA wished to 9ive more assistance than they
authorized conceptually, Staff would like to go back and rework the numbers
and come back with a recommendation, taking into account the feasibility
of the Lundgren project and whatever else they could potentially be doing to
treat the two projects more equally. If there was going to be a change in
assistance, then both projects should be loaked at.
Ms. Kuretich stated they need to know 6,y the first of December whether they
will be able to get the 7eve1 of tax assistance they need for the project.
They need ta have an amendment to the tax increment plan which provides for
the bonding for this project by the City Council by that date. That was one
of tfie conditions on the purchase of the land.
Mr. Rasmussen stated that philosophically he had e problem with this request
for additional funding and fe7t a decision should be made at this meeting.
Ms. Linda Fisher stated they did get conceptual approval by the HRA at the
August meeting for a level of assistance in the amount of $850,000, and they had
proceeded on that basis, t�ow they have to request a different level af
assistance due solely to a change in the tax laa�. Obviously, it would have
been tl�eir preference to get a similar concept decision this evening from the
NRA on the new request, but it appeared the HRA had some desire to look at
ttiis further before making a positive recommendatian.
Ms. Fisher stated that if the HRA had any interest in pursuing this request
for additional assistance, either their request or some variation of that
request, although time was of the essence, she believed they could work with
Staff to come back at the October meeting and maybe the HRA could make a final
concept decision at that meeting. If Staff felt it was important to see how
this request for additional assistance related to another project, hopefully
that analysis could be done ir, the same timeframe, and they could then
proceed to negotiate a new deve7opment Contract, coming back to the Plov. 13th
meeting, In the meantime, they could be making progress on the rezoning process.
MO:ZON BY MR. PRAZRIE� SECONDED BY MR. MEYER� TO TABLE SNE DECISIDN ON THF,
REQUEST FOR ADDZTZONAL ASS752ANCE ON THE UNIVERSITY AVENUE APARTMENT PROJECT
UNTIL THE OC2CJBER MEETZNG.
UPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTSNG AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSpN SCHNABEL DECLRRED THE
MOTIDN CARRSED UNRNZMOUSLY.
11. Af1ENDMENT TO TNE LIMITED REVENUE NOTE FQR THE 100 TWIN DRIVE-IN PROJECT:
Mr, tdewman stated that at the last meeting when the HRA approved the changes
in the development agreement, the HRA had agreed Lhat instead of incorporating
the level of assisY:ance in the development agreement, they would rather make
cl�anges to the note -dnstead. }ie staie6 the numbers were the same, it was just
a matter of forrt�. Ne stated Yae would recomnend approval of a resolution
anending the limited revenue note.
HOUSING 8 REDEVELOPP1Ef�T AUTHORITY PIEETING, SEPTEMBER 11, 1986 P�GE 13
MOTION BY MR. RASMUSSEN, SECONDED BY MR. MEYER� TO APPROI�E RESOLUTION NO.
HRA 18 1986.
UPON A VDSCE VOTE� RLL VOTING AYE� VICE-CXRIRPERSON SCNNABEL DECLARED TNE
MOTIDN CARRIED UNRNIMDUSLY.
12. ESTIPiATES:
Mr. Robertson stated they had an estimate in the amount of $812.50 which was
additional work to be done by Suburban Engineering providing additional
specifics for those contracts which they are rebidding.
MOTION BY MR. PRAIRIE� SECONDED BY MR, RASMUSSEN� TO APPROVE THE ESTIMATE
OF $812.50 TO SUBURBAN ENGINEERZNG.
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE� VICE-CHASRPERSON SCHNABEL DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANZMOUSLY.
13. CHECK REGISTER:
MOTZON BY MR. PRAIRZE� SECONDED BY MR. MEYER� TO APPROI/E 2HE CHECK REGISTER
AS SUBl:ZTTED,
UPON A VOZCE i�OTE� ALL VOTING RYE� VZCE-CHAZRPERSON SCHNABEL DECLARED THE
MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY,
14. �THER BUSINESS:
Mr, Qureshi stated he wanted to remind the Comnission members that a special
joint conference meeting between the HRA and the City Council was scheduled
for Tues., Sept, 23, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. The purpose of
the meeting was to have interaction between the City Council and HRA to
develop an analysis and approach on how they want to expend funds they will
have available in the near future for doing sane project.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION BY MR. RASMUSSEN� SECONDED BY MR, PRAIRIE� TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON
A VOZCE [�OTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON 5CHNABEL DECLt1RED THE SEPT, ZZ, 1986�
HOUSING 6 REDEVELOPMENT AUTXORITY MEETING AATOUHNED AT 10:50 P,M.
Respectfully submitt:llG.�`��
C
Lyn Sa a
Recording Secretary
CITY OF FRIDLEY
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION
MEETING
SEPTEMBER 16, 1986
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Svanda Called the September 16, 1986, Environmental Qualiiy
Commission meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Richard Svanda, Maynard Niels�n, Dale Thompson, Wa}'ne Wellan
Members Absent: Bruce Peterson
Others Present: Myra Gibson, Planning Assistant
APPROVAL OF AUCLST 19, 1986, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTIOn by Mr. Hellan, seconded by Mr. Thompson, to approve the August 19, 1986,
Environmental Quality Commission minutes as written.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SVANDA DECLARED THE MOTIOh
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
1. DISCUSSION ON CURSSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM
Ms. Gibson noted that no formal bids for the curbside recycling program
were received on August 19, the deadline date. Ms. Gibson spoke with
Mr. Beermann of Beermann Services who indicated he did not wish to submit
a bid, but he would keep the program going until the City could find some-
one else. Ms. Gibson was then contacted by a representative from Watkins
Aircraft Support Ptoducts whose subsidiary, Super Cycle, provides curbside
collection. A formal bid was submitted. After negotiating with Mr. John
Luoma of Super Cycle, an agreement was reached to set a base iate of $1,500
per month for up to 50 tons of recycleables collected and $40 per ton over
50 tons not to exceed $1,875 per month. Ms. Gibson distributed copies of
the September 11, 1586, memo to Mr. Robinson regarding the contract.
Ms. Gibson brought the matter before the City Council who did approve the
contract Supercycle ca�ae in the n�xt day with all additional changes
completed�and signed [he contract for 10 months. Super G�cle did their first
piaic-up last Friday. They are not collecting used oil or batteries. Ms. Gibson
stated that Supercycle had been highly reconanerided by several other cities.
Mr. Wellan wondered how this firm could be successful uith curbsiQe programs
and recycling xhen :bthers cannot?
Ms. Gibson felt that they were successful because the firm had done back-
ground work and studies, and they were part of a successful busines�already.
EA'\'IRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 PAGE 2
2
Ms. Gibson stated that she had received some calls about missed pick ups
and that Super Cycle had gone back to pick up. All calls were handled
except one that had come in late in the day. Residents who had not had
used oil picke3 up were told about the drop off at the S.O.R.T. site and
there seemed to be no problem with this. Super Cycle's office has a radio
dispatch, trucks, and a driver stops in each Frid�y to pick up and compar�
notes. The company seems to be very receptive.
Ms. Gibson noted that three items in the specifications had been amended. Super
Cycle does not have one year's expetience so that specification was changed to
include a list of acceptable references. Missed collection s¢heduZe, and the_
term.�of the contract were also changed. Copies of the changes vere distri6uted.
The contract is effective until June 30, 1987. If the City renews funding
from Anoka County, the contract will automatically renew until the funding
runs out.
The committee approved the contract with Super Cycle and felt this was a
positive step for the curbside recycling program.
DISCUSSION ON S.O.R.T. DROP-OFF RECYCLING CENTER
Ms. Gibson brought before the City Council the proposed lease agreements
received from Mr. Blumenthal, Universal Can, and from Earl Frank. The
proposal from Mr. Blumenthal was accepted. One change was made in the
proposed five-year lease. The agreement is for a two-year lease with an
option for three more years.
Mr. Wellan asked if Universa2 Can and Super Cycle seemed comfortable working
with each other.
Ms. Gibson felt they were. She noted that Super Cycle would be using the
S.O.R.T. site for storing trucks.
Ms. Gibson indicated that she had been working on a site plan for S.O.R.T.
but that the plan was not yet final. She is trying to get the traffic to
flow through the site for both the recycling drop-off and the composting
area.
Ms. Gibson stated that she has received a number of calls asking when the
S.O.R.T. site would be re-opened. If the lease agreement is approved on
Monday, llniversal Can coUld collect recycleables in the near future.
Mr. Nielson stated that publicity aauld be needed.
Ms. Gibson stated that she uould put an announcemen[ in the Fridley Focus
and the Minneapolis Star and Tribune. Ms. Gibson noted that she seems to
get a greater response from information placed in the Minneapolis Star and
Tribune.
Mr. Svanda recommended that Universal Can get in touch wit� the Minnesota
PCA before colleciing tires and othex items that may be considered hazardous
wastes.
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER i6, 1986 PAGE 3
Ms. Gibson referred to the article included with the agenda regarding the
collection of household hazardous wastes and expressed interest in having
such a collection in Fridley.
Mr. Svanda indicated that due to budget constraints additional household
hazardous waste collections may not be possible. At this time the PCA is
waiting to see if funds will be approved by the EPA.
3. UPDATE ON THE MET COUNCIL GRANTS AND LOANS PROGRAM
M�. Gibson contacted the Met Council and learned that two grants are coming
up - one is a program to fund buildings which could be used for the building
at the S.O.R.T. site and another is funds for research and development for
recycleables which could go along with education. Glynnis Jones, the
:dministrator for the solid waste programs, felt funding is available and
that the City could work with funds that are available.
4. UPDATE ON JAYCEE'S RECYCLING EDUCATION
Mr. Thompson stated that some education was done in the schools in the
spring. The presentations Were very successful and well liked. He felt
there was more that could be done but has not started working with a program
this fall. The people who worked on the program in the spring would likely
be willing to do the program again. Mr. Thompson would like to do an
expanded program and would like to get more people involved. He suggested
going into the junior and senior high schools and getting help from other
gTOUps such as clubs or scouts so that more covld be done. He noted that
the people did not want to present information in front of classes., but that
they were willing to do other work.
Mr. Wellan suggested working with civic groups such as the League of Women
Voters.
Ms. Gibson noted that Ms. Connie Metcalf of the League of Women Voters had
mentioned that this group had some funds available for a project for
recycling. She may be able to help.
Mr. Thompson thought that community organizations and clubs in the schools
would be the first places to go to for support.
Mr. Wellan also suggested working with 4-H groups. He noted that Mr. Barnette
may know of other groups in schools and wondered if perhaps the speech groups
could do speeches on recycling.
Mr. Thompson indicated that part of the education would also include information
about the programs available.
5. OTHER BUSZNESS
a. Eagle Scout Service Project. Ms. Gibson re€er.red io the report from the
Eagle Scout Khich was included in the agenda.
Mr. Thompson noted thet contacting people directly showed positive
results.
ENVIRQNMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 PAGE 4
Mr. Wellan requested a letter of appreciation be sent to the Eagle
Scout.
Ms. Gibson indicated that a letter had been sent.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Mr. Wellan, seconded by Mr. Nielsen, to adjourn the meeting.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SVANDA DECLARED THE SEPTEMBER 16,
1986, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:14 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
�Q/�f�'iL'JL/ GJ • ��
Lavonn Cooper
Recording Secretary
CITY OF FRIDLEY
APPEALS CODQSISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 30, 1986
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Betzold called the September 30, 1986, Appeals Commission meeting
to order at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Donald Betzold, A1ex Sarna, Jerry Sherek, Diane Savage
Members Absent: None
Others Present: Darrel CLark, Chief Building Official
Dr. Wayne Dahl
Mr. Gary Obrycki
i•Lr. Tom Obrycki
Mr, and Mrs. Homer Melton
Mr, and Mrs. Gordon Sangster, 7169 Riverview Terrace
APPRO��AL OF SEPTEMBER 16 1986. APPEALS COP4IISSION hIINUTES:
MOTION BY M[t. BARNA, SECONDED BY MS. SAVAGE, TO APPROVE THE SEP'TEMBER 16,
1986, APPEALS CODAffSSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
1.
N,E, , FRIDLEY. MINA`ESOTA.
MOTION BY MR, BARNA, SECONDED BY hLS. SAVAGE, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DEC�RED THE PiTBLIC
HEARING OPEN AT 7:32 p.m.
Chairperson Betxold read the Administratzve Staff Report:
ADrIINISTRATIVE STAFF P.EPQRT
7699 VIRON ROAD N.E.
VAR ��86-24
APPEaLS COAt*tISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 30 1986 PAGE 2
A
f�
C
PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT:
Section 205.14.3, C, 1 requires a front yard setback of not less
than 35 feet.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to a11ow for off-street
parking without encroaching on the public right-of-way and also for
aesthetic consideration [o reduce [he building "line of sight"
encroachment in[o [he neighbor's front yard.
Section 205.14.5, C, L requires at Least one (1) off-street parking
space 6e provided for each 150 square feet of building floor area in
a C-z district.
The public purpose served is to ensure that an adequate number of
parking stalls are provided for off-street parking.
Section 205.14.5, A requires that adequate open space be provided to
satisfy the total number of requited parking stalls. A reduction of
parking stalls may be allowed when the provision o£ space required
for parking stalls, due [o the particular nature of the proposed usc
or other considerations, would be an unnecessary hardship. Public
purpose served is to ensure that an adequate number of parking stalls
are provided for off-s[reet parking.
STATED H?,RDSHIP:
"A hardship was crea[ed by the rerouting of the Viron Loopback, and
by the lot size."
ADMINISTIUATIVE STAFF REVIEW;
The petitioner is proposing to coostruct a second, clinical use
structure of 6,400 square feeC. Recent construction of the Viro❑
Road loopback has left the property with abutting right-of-way on
four sides, which has resulted in unusually restrictive setback
demands.
In conjunction with the project the petitioner has applied for a
rezoning from C-3 to C-2 to reduce building setback requirements
from 80 feet to 35 feet. In addi[ion, the City is processing a
right-of-way vacation for the abandoned portion of Viron Road.
The petitioner is req�esting a variance to allow him to place the
new building eight feet into said rigfit-of-way. Once the vacation
is completed this setback necessitates a variance from 35 to 22
feet from the Highway 65 right-of-way.
Total building square footage with the addi[ion equals 8,000 square
feet. The C-2 code requires one off-street parking sta11 for each
150 square feet of floor area--or 53 stalls. If parking is layed
out to meet code, (i.e. 20 foot setback from a11 right-of-ways)
36 stalls are possible. This results in a provision of one sta11
for each 216 square feet of floor area.
APPEALS COhAffSSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 30 1986 PAGE 3
The petitioner has submitted a plan which includes 39 stalls--three
of which do not meet setback requirements. The petitioner is re-
questing hard surface setbacks from street right-of-ways from 20
' feet [0 0 feet on the Northeast corner, from 20 feet to 6 feet on
the North line, from 20 feet to 14 feeC on the East, and fzom 20
feet to 8 feet on the Southeast corner.
Mr. Clark stated the petitioner purchased this property in 1981 and
has done extensive remodeling of the building. He stated Dr. Dahl
is proposing to construct a second structure and is requesting a
num6er of variances.
Mr. Clark stated Dr. Dah1 has filed a rezoning petition [o rezone this
property from C-3 to C-2 in order to reduce [he setback requirement.
He stated in discussing Chis rezoning, s[aff felt perhaps the property
should be zoned [o CR-1 so that a retail outlet wou2d not be permi[ted
on this property. He stated this has not been discussed with Dr. Dahl
nor submitted to the Council.
Ph. Clark stated the petitioner has also applied for a vacation of
the abandoned portion of Viron Road.
hk. Clark stated a variance is requested to reduce the front yard setback
fro^ 3� to 22 feet fron Hwy. 65 righ[-of-way and from 35 to 25 feet off
the South property line.
Ph. Betzold asked if the
the setback requirement.
for a C-2 zone.
property is rezoned to CR-1, what would be
2�fr . C1ark stated it would be the same as
Mr. Clark�stated a variance is also requested on the parking. He
stated the Code requires one off-s[reet parking stall for each li0
fee[ of floor area or 53 stalls. He s[ated the plat shows 39 parking
stalls, however, staff felt [wo stalls should be eliminated in the
Northeas[ corner for aesthetic purposes and another stall eliminted
on the Southeast corner to reduce the parking close to the curb.
Mr. Clark stated one of the parking stalls could be moved to ano[her
area on the site, therefore there would be 37 remaining stalls.
i•tr. CLark s[ated staff found there generally is a lot of traffic at
clinics and the proper ratio would probably be in the area of one
parking stall for every 150 to 250 square feet of floor area. He
stated this proposed parking plan comes close to the 200 ratio.
Ah-. Ciark stated a variance is requested to reduce the setback on
the Northeast corner from 20 to 0 fee[. He stated this variance
would not be necessary if tvo parking stalls were eliminated. He
stated the variance reqe�este� on the Southeast cor.ner would not be
necessary if a parking sta11 is eliminated.
Pfr . Barna asked if there would be a visuat obstruction on the South-
east corner if the parking stali wasn`t eliminated. t�fr. CLark felt
if proper driving Lanes are maintained and people do not cut the
center line, it probably wouldn't be a problem.
AppEALS CONAffSSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 30, 198b PAGE 4
Dr. Dahl stated he is proposing to construction a quality structure
on this property of brick and glass. He felt the setback from Highway
65 is substantial and didn't feel i[ would cause any problems.
Dr. Dahl stated since he purchased this property in 1981, there have
been many changes with the installation of the sidewalk, widening
of Os6orne Road and construction of the loopback. He stated some of
the hardships here were basically ones created by his giving the Land
to improve Viron Road and install sidewalks. He stated when he gave
those easements, one of the requests made was the City not pLace undo
restrictions on him in regard to his future needs.
Dr. Dahl stated the area on [he north where two parking stalls arc
located is nicely bermed and Landscaped and used for handicaPped
parking. He stated there are sidewalks along [he back to allow access
for the handicapped. He stated if these parking stalls remained,
this plan would only fall one parking sta11 short based on a 1 to 200
ratio. Dr. Dahl stated there are some clinics on a 1 to 250 ratio
so it would be an improvement over existing situations.
rff. Betzold asked ❑r. Dahl why he needed two separate buildings on
the site.
Dr. Dah1 stated the initial plan was to add on to the existing building.
He stated in talking with the architect, when you add space four times
the size of the existing buiLding, the economics don't make much sense.
Dr. Dahl stated when the existing building was remodeled, weight
bearing posts were added which also makes it impractical to add on
to it.
Mr. Betaold asked what would be the us° of the two structures. Dr.
Dah1 stated there is a physician interested in Locating in the ❑ew
facility. He stated they are also outgrowing their existing facility
and would possibly move into the new buiiding and use [he present
building for offices. He stated there are no definite plans, but a
number of possibilities.
Mr. Betzold asked if the building could be reduced in size. Dr. Dahl
stated when he met with the architect, they took al1 factors into
account such as the size of the parcel, code requirements, and the
amount of space that would be needed if this facility were to be
utilized as a multi-purpose building. He stated if they wish to
use the building for this purpose, the amount of square footage is
certainly needed,
hir. Betzold stated he recognizes this is a very unique situation, but
wondered if the proposal would result in overbuildin@ on this Lot.
Dr. Uahi asked Mr. Betzold if he felt nncomfortable wit'h the amount
of parking provided.
APPEALS COPAIISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 PAGE 5
Mr. Be[zold stated he realizes property has been taken from this
parcel, however, when you add a new structure,along with an exist-
ing structure, he felt it may be too much for this property.
t�h. Sherek asked if the architect considered any plan that would
engulf [he existing building or a11ow an enclosed passageway to make
more efficient use of the space.
Dr. Dahl stated the whole philosophy was to move closer to Highway 65
and Osborne Road and raise the structure to a level equal with the
roadways. He stated this seemed to be the most aesthetically pleasing.
He stated cost was a factor aLso so they didn't get into a lot of
exotic plans.
Mr, Barna asked if there were any other plans proposed by the architect.
Dr. Dahl stated there were a total of seven and he felt [his was the
best they could come up with and many hours were put into this parti-
cular plan.
Nh. Clark stated the Code allows for a iot coverage of 401.
He stated the property is about 18,000 square feet and [he coverage
they are proposing is about 8,000 square feet.
No other persons in the audience spoke regarding these proposed
variances.
h10TI0N BY MEt. BARNA, SEC �VDED BY MS. SREREK, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLC DECLARED THE
PUBLIC HE�IRING CLOSED AT 8:15 p.m.
Mr, Barna stated he didn't like the idea of eliminating the handicapped
parking s[all on the North end. He stated he would favor eliminating
one sCa11 on the Northeast corner. He felt with the parking sta11
on the Southeast corner that it would be a long time before it would
become a traffic hazard. He sta[ed he would prefer to retain two of
these three parking stalls and [o only eliminate the one sta11 on thc
Northeast corner. He stated this would give a total of 38 parking
stalls.
Dr. Dah1 stated on the Northeast corner, there is a power pole so,
from a safety standpoint, the parking sta11 is we11-protected. He
stated from an aesthetic standpoint, the aesthetics wouldn't be
improved by removing the parking sta11.
Pfr , Barna stated he didn't object totally to parking on the Northeast
corner, but did object to parking almost to the si.dewalk. He stated
he would like the parking stall away from the sidewalk so one should
be removed at this corner.
AppEALS COhAfISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 30. 1986 PAGE 6
Pfr. Betzold stated he did appreciate a11 the work that has gone
in[o the plan to develop an attractive building. He stated they
have dealt with other properties in the City where loopbacks
have been installed and not much can be done with the properties
without variances. He s[ated he does have some concern about the
number of variances and if it might not be possible to make use of
the property without a11 the variances.
MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY M5, SAVAGE, SO RECOMMEND TO CITY
COUNCIL ApPROVAL OF THE VARI�NCE TO REDUCE THE WEST FRONT YARD
SETBACK FROM THE REQUIRED 35 FEET TO 22 FEET.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CkU+IRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
MOTION BY MIt. BARNA, SECONDED BY MEt. SHEREK, TO RECOI�4tEND TO CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE VARLANCE TO REDUCE THE SOUTH FRONT YARD SE.-
&1CK FROb] THE REQUIRED 35 FEET TO 25 FEET,
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CH�IIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
t•DTION CARRIED UNANTMOUSLY,
MOTION BY PYt. BARNA, SECONDED BY hS, SAVAGE, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE HARD SURFACE SETBACK
FROhf STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER FROhf 20 FEET TO
5 FEET, BY ELIMINATING THE FAR NORTHEAST PARKING STALL.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECI.4RED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
MOTION B1 PIIi, BARNA, SECONDED BY MS. SAVAGE, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY
COUNCIL A PPROVAL OF THE VAR7ANCE TO REDUCE THE HARD SURFACE SETBACK
FROM 20 FEET TO 6 FEET ON THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE, FROM 20 FEET TO
14 FEET ON TRE EAST PROPERTY LINE, AND FROM 20 FEET TO 8 FEET ON THE
SOUTHEAST PROPERTY LINE.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
M OTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY N�. SAVAGE, TO RECOMh1END TO CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE VARIt1NCE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED OFF-STREET
P�RKING REQUIREMENT FROM 53 STALLS TO 38 PARKING STALLS.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNEINIMOUSLY.
Dr. Dah1 stated he wouldn't have any problem with a CR-1 zone for his
property as he didn't have any plans for a retail operatian at this
location.
Mr. Setzold stated this item would go to the City Council on October 20,
1986.
ApPEALS COMI�IISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 30 1986 PAGE 7
2. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR ;P86-27, BY C�1RY AND TOPf OBRYCKI,
MOTION BY M[t. &1RNA, SECONDED BY MS, SHEREK, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING>
UPON A��OICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
gUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:30 p.m.
Chairperson Betzold read the Administrative Staff Report:
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT
105 - 71-1/2 WaY N.E.
VAR 1�86-27
A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMEr'T:
Section 205.07.3, ➢, 1, requires a front yard with a depth of not less
than thirty-five (35) feet.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to allow for off-street
parking without encroaching on the public right-of-way and also for
aesthetic consideration to reduce [he building "line of sight"
encroachment into the neighbor's front yard.
Section 205.07.3, D, 3, requires a rear yard with a depth not less
Chan 25% of the lot depth, with not less than 25 feet permitted for
the main building.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide rear yard space
to be used for green areas which enhance the neighborhood.
B. STATED HARDSHIP:
"There is a six foot high fence that runs along both parcels on their
back Lot line. This will give these homes a sma11-looking and cramped
backyard appearance."
C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW:
The parcel of Land in question, Lot 32, Revised Auditor's Subd`_si;ion
No. 77, is long and narrow c:ith one single-family house located on it.
This existing house is to be removed, the 1ot split in three, and
singLe-family houses constructed on each of the three Lots.
Plans call for a front yard setback af 25 feet for the western-most two
of the three proposed dwellings. Both of these dwellings will be 26
APPEALS COMhII5SI0N MEETING SEPTEMBER 30 1986 PAGG 8
feet in wid[h. Enough room will be Left for a rear yard depth of at
least 21 feet.
If the variances are approved, then the petitioner will have the
parcels platted.
I�'h. CLark stated the petitioner has a contract to purchase this
parcel contingent upon his being able to build three homes on this
lot. He stated the property in question is north of the previous
site of Riverwood School and on the end of 71-1/2 Way.
Mr. Clark stated the petitioner wishes to remove the existing house
and plat the property into three parcels in order to construct three
new homes. He stated in order to build a 26 foot wide home, a front _
yard setback of only 25 feet could be provided and a 21 foot setback
provided in the rear yard. i�fr . Clark stated the Code requires a
front yard setback of 35 feet and a rear yard setback of 25 feet.
I�h. Clark stated the parcel widens towards East River Road so one of
the Iots would not require a variance.
hh. Obrvcki, the petitioner, stated the existing home on this parcel
is about 3� years old with no basement and 1ow ceilings inside the
home. He feLt it would benefit the area if this house was removed and
new homes constructed, as it is adjacent to the Riverwood School site
where new homes are being construc[ed.
Ph'. Betzold stated the easterly most lot could be developed without
ana variances so it is the question if variances should 6e granCed
in order for houses to be constructed on the other two lots.
Pfr. Barna stated the question is really that the petitioner wants to
develop a strip of property approximately 75 feet wide and that is
really the hardship.
hh. Gordon Sangster, 7169 Fiverview Terrace, stated he felt the addi-
tion of these new homes in the area would be a tremendous improvement.
He stated the petitioner does meet [he requirements as far as 1ot
size.
I�. Obrycki stated if they cannot build these homes, they would leave
the existing house and se11 off part of the property to a property
owner who is interested in purchasing a portinn i❑ order to enlarge
his 1ot. He feit, he�wever, it would be more aesthetically pleasi�g
to remove the home and construct three new homes.
I�fr . Betzold asked Mr. Sangster if he felt it would be better to have
the peti[ioner se11 some of the property to one of the neighbors
who wishes to purchase it and only have two new homes built.
� hk�. Sangster stated he felt the existing home should be removed and
three new homes constructed.
APPEdLS COhfMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 30 1986 PAGE 9
No other persons in the audience spoke regarding these proposed
variances.
MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDE➢ BY I�. SAVAGE, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIItPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
HEARING CLOSED AT 8:50 p.m.
Ms. Savage stated she Looked at this property and would agree the
existing house is not attractive for [he area. She felt it would
benefit the neighborhood to have it removed and new homes constructed.
I°tr, Barna stated it is no fault of the petitioner that this is a sub-
standard lot,as far as lot depth,and is a problem Co the developer.
He s[ated the building "line of�sight" would be maintained. Ptr. $arna
feLt this wouldn't create a situation that would be de[rimental to
the neighborhood and the three homes would be an improvement.
hfr. Sherek stated the hardship is obvious and [he plan seems to be
feasible. He stated he appreciated the input from the neighbors.
Mr. Betzold stated almost anything [hat is done with this property
would require some sart of variance. He stated he wan[ed to stress
he wouldn't be receptive to future variances for decks or other
additions. He felt the persons purchasing these homes have to under-
stand they have to make the best of the situation. He stated even
though the variance is approved, i[ isn't the final action as a lot
split is required.
MOTION SY M[t. BARNA, SECONDED BY rLS. SAVAGE, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY
COUNC II. APPROVdL OF THE VARIAfiCES TO REDUCE THE FRONT Y:1RD SETBACK
FROP1 35 FEET TO 25 F�ET AND REDUCE THE REAR YeiRD SETBACK FROM 25 FEET
TO 21 FEET TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF THREE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS ON
LOT 32, REVISED AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION N0, 77, THE SAT1E BEING 105 -
71-1/2 WAY N,E,
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING �YE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2fr. Be[zold stated this item would go to the City Council on October 20,
1986.
3
CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR �f86-28, BY HODIER MELTON, PURSUANT
TO CHAPTER 205.07,3 D 2a OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDUCE THE SI➢E
YARD SETBACK FOR LNING AREA FROM 10 FEET TO 7.5 FEET (R-1 IN R-3 ZONING);
APPE?.LS CODPIISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 30 1986 PAGE 10
MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY D1S, SAVAGE, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
UPD*7 A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CtL1IRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:57 p.m.
Chairperson Betzold read the Administrative Staff Report:
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT
5330 4TH STREET N.E.
VAR �k86-28
A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT:
Section 205.07.3, D, 2a, requires a side yard of ten feet between any
living area and side property lines.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to maiotain a minimum of
20 feet 6etween living areas in adjacent structures and 15 feet between
garages and living areas in adjacent structures to reduce explosure to
conflagration of fire. It is also to a12ow for aestheticall}' pleasing
open areas around residential structures.
Section 205.07.d, D, 1, requires a front yard with a depth of qot less
than thirty-five (35) feet,
Public purpose served by this requirement is to aLlow for off-s[reet
parking without encroaching on the public right-of-way and also for
aesthetic consideration to reduce the buiLding "line of sight"
encroachment into the ❑eighbor's front yard.
B. STATED HARDSHIP:
"We live in a two bedroom house with three teenage kids and need extra
bedrooms very badly."
C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW:
If these variances are approved the petitioner would remove a laundry
room now located 2 feet from the north Line and add a 20 x 22 foot
addition out the back and maintain a 7 foot distance from the north as
is the existing Location of the present house.
The nearest structure to the north is more than 20 feet away from the
proposed addition.
If the Appeals Commission approves this request the staff has no stip-
ulations to suggest.
Mr. Clark stated this propertp is located on 4ttr Street just north of
53rd Avenue. He showed a drawing of the existing house and the front
is approximately 26 feet from the curb.
Mr. Clark stated the petitioner is requesting the variances i❑ order
to add a 20 x 22 foo[ addition to the back of his home, with this
addition attached to the garage.
APPFr�LS COMMISSION MEETING SEPfEMBER 30 1986 PAGE 11
t�fr . Mel[on stated their home is one of the original ones in
Fridley. He stated they have two sma11 bedtooms upstairs and a
living room and kitchen downstairs. He stated they need additional
space and is the reason for the variance request.
Mr. Melton stated there house was built before the street was con-
structed.
Atr. Clark stated, technically, the code states you cannot enlarge a
legal non-conforming use. He stated rather than tear down the home,
they elected to apply for a variance to reduce the setbacks in the
front and side yards. He felt this would actually be an improvement
as the laundry room now Located two feet from the north line would be
removed.
No other persons in the audience spoke regarding these proposed vari-
ances.
MOTION BY M[t. BARNA, SECONDED BY ALS, SAVAGE, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CH�IIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLIRED THE
HEARING CLOSEfl AT 9:05 p.m.
Mr, Barna stated a hardship consti[utes any situation which makes the
property unuseable for the present owners as it stands. He stated
he felt the petitioner needs the additional space. Mr. Barna stated
che lot was put in around the house and the present setbacks are no
fault of the owners. He felt [he addition would be an improvement of
the property.
All the other Commission members indicated [hey agreed with I°h-. Barna's
comments.
PIOTION BY M5. SAVAGE, SECONDED BY MEt. BARNa, TO RECOMhMENU TO CITY
COUtICIL APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCES TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK
FOR L N ING AR&1 FROM 10 FEET TO 7.5 FEET AND TO REDUCE THE FRONT
YARD SETBACK FROM 35 FEET TO 14 FEET TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF A 20 X 22 FOOT ADDITION TO THE BACK OF AN EXISTING STRUCTURE�
THE SAME BEING 5330 4TH STREET N.E,
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VQTING AYE, CH.�IRPERSON BETZOLD DECLSRED THE
MOTION GIRRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ADJOURNMENT •
MOTION BY MEt. B�RNA, SECONDED BY MS. SHEREK, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING, UPON
A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOl13 DECLARED TNE SEPTEMBER 30,
1986, APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:08 p.m.
Respectfully submi[ted,
/ . • 1 ,
' � - �-:'t_ `�-Lr.: i�',� r./' _
Carole Haddad
Recording Secretary