PL 12/10/1986 - 6886j,
:�
City of Fcidley
AGENDA -
PI.AiIIait� mPII975STON N�ETING WIDNF5IIT�Y, 17ELEI+�ER 10, 1986 7:3Q P. M.
Location: Co�cil Chauber (upper level}
CAI,L ZLt ORDER•
PDLL CAI�I,:
APPIa�VE PiANNING CX�R4ISSTpN MTl�[7TES• tQ7VF'�lBF�2 19 1986
:.�;,y
(Tabled November 19, 1986) - PUBLIC HEARING:
Q�NSIDERATIDN OF A PRELIliINARY A.AT� P. S. #86-06, VALLEY
OAKS. BY Q3AFtLES CDOK: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - ].L
Being a replat of that part of Lot 22� Block 3. I�ore
Lake Hi11s, Anaka County, Minnesota, lying southerly af a
line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the
mrtheasterly line of Lot 21, Slock 3, Mooce Lake Hills,
distant 35.00 feet northwesterly from the nottheast
corner; thence southwesterly to a point on the
southwesterly line of said Lot 22, distant 42.00 feet
northwesterly fran the southwest carner of said Lot 22
and there tecmi.nating. E�ccept that �rt there- of lying
northeasterly of tl�e following described line: Beginning
at a point on the north line of said Lot 22, distant 5.00
feet westexly fran �e northeast mrner; thence southerly
to a point an the south line of said lot, distant 60.Od
feet westezly from the southeast corner. Subject to
eas�nents, if any, and that �azt of Lot 21 and 21, Block
3, Moore Lake Hills, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying
easterly, southeasterly and northeasterly of a line
described as follows: Beginning at a point on the
northeasterly line of said Lot 21, distant 212.00 feet
southeastezly of the most northerly corner of said Lot
21, thence southwesterly, at a right angle to said
northeasterly line, to its intersection with line A,
hereafter described, thence southwesterly, along said
line A to its intersection with a line descrihed as
beginning at a point on the north line of said Lot 2'l,
distant 5.00 feet westerly of the northeast cornez,
thence southerly to a paint on the south lien of said Lot
22, distant 60.00 feet westerly of the southeast corner,
thence southetly, along last described line, to the south
line of said Lot 22 and there terminating. Line A is
described as beginning at a point on the north- easterly
northeast oarner, thence southwesterly to a point on the
southwesterly line of said Lot 22, said point distant
42.00 feet mrthwesterly fran the south- west corner of
said Lot 22, and there terminating. Subject to
easements, if any, and t2ie east 600.00 feet of the south
200.00 feet of the north 882.5 feet of the northwest
quarter of the northeast quazter of Section 24, 4bwnship
30, Range 24, located in Anoka County, Minnesota,
generally located soath of Hillcrest Drive and north of
Gardena Avenue.
r
_`
PI,ANNING COhP1ISSI0N I�EPING
DECII�'�ER 10 , 19 86
PAGE 2
(Tabled November 19, 1986) - O�NSIDE�2ATION OF A VACATION
REQ[JEST, SAV #86-06, BY CfiART�ES COOK: . . . . . . . .
Vacate easements far public utilities described as
follaas: the south 5 feet of Lot 22, Block 3, tloore Lake
Hills and the south 5 feet and the east 10 feet of Lot
21, Block 3, Moore Lake Hills, generally located south of
Flillcrest Drive and north of Gardena Avenue.
PUBLIC HEARING: CONS7DERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT,
P.S. #86-07, A& R SDCODID P,DDTTION, EY JOHN L�LSON: ...
Being a replat of Lot 4, Block 1, A& R Addition to the
City of Fridley, Andca County, Minnesota, and the south
300 feet of the north 750 feet of the Northeast Quarter
o£ the Northwest Quarter except the east 720 feet
thereof, all in Section 12, T-30, R-24, Anoka County,
Minnesota, subject to road easetnents of reconi, to allan�
for the developtrent of four separate parceLs of land,
generally located south of Osborne Road and east of Viron
Road.
. . . 2 - 2D
PUBI,IC HEARING: CONSIDEP,ATION OF A REZONING REQUEST,
ZQA #86-06. BY JOHN I�LSON : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rezone fran C-3, General Shopping Center, to C-2, General
Business, on the south 300 feet of the north 750 feet of
the Northeast Quart er of the Northwest Quarter except the
east 720 feet thereof, all in Secti� 12, T-30, R-24,
Anoka Coimty, Minnesota, subject to road easements of
necord, generally located south of Osborne Road and east
of Viron Road.
. 3 - 3H
4-4E
CONSIDII2ATION OF A LOT SPLTT, L.S. #86-�9, BY VANrAC�
COr'II�ANIES, INC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - 5 E
Split the South 60 feet of the North 425.23 feet of the
South 877.87 feet of all that part of the Sout}raest
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, T-30,
R-24, lying Westerly of the State Trunk Highway 47.
CONSIDERATION OF A MODIFIID RIDSUIIAPME�1r PIAN FOR
RIDEVEL�OPME�7P P%a7EGT N0. 1(CENTER CITY RIDEVELOPI`gTFP
AREA) PSID TAX INCRII�NP FINANCING PLANS FOR TAX INCR2II�ISP
FINP.NCING DISPRICT NO. 1 TF�UGH 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 60
CpNSIDERATION OF AN ORDII�NCE CHFiNGE TO UPDATE THE
NII�ICAL CLINIC PARKING SI'ADIDARDS ADID THE CHURCH ZONING
REQOIRF2�1�7'PS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7C
RECEIVING THE HOtJSING & RF�EVELOPB�'Nf AUTfiORITY DIINCPI�S
OF 1�7ErIDER 13, 1986 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . WHZTE
RECEIVING THE MIN[PPES OF THE ENVIR(X�7ENTAL QUAI,ITY
CCY�R�iISSION OF I3(7VNI�7BER 18 , 19 86 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BLUE
RECEIVING THE MINCTPES OF THE APPEALS COP7�'LiSSION OF
NOVfS'iBER 25, 1986 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YELIlJW
dI'HER HUSINESS: . ,
� • • • i�+
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B - SB
�
CITY Of FRIDLEY
PLA�dtdING COPIMISSIOW MEETIt�G, NOVEt46ER 19, 1986
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Billings called the I�ovember 19, 1986, Planning Comnission meetin� to
order at 7:32 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Menbers Present: Steve Billings, Uave Kondrick, Dean Saba, Sue Sherek,
Donald Qetzold
tlenbers Absent: Richard Svanda
Otiiers Present: Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator
Jock Robertson, Comnunity Develo�ment Director
Dennis Schneider, Councilperson
fJancy Jorgenson, Councilnerson-Elect
Pir. &'1rs. Richard Lindquist, 1326 Hillcrest Dr.
Helfride tianning, 1315 liillcrest Dr.
Connie tlodig, 133Q Hillcrest �r.
Edna Hinvtzke, 1328 Hillcrest Dr.
Steve Shorma, 5916 �ak4�ood Planor
Yoava Klucsar, 1337 flillcrest Dr.
Charles Cook, Coon Rapids
APPROVAL OF tlOVEHBEP, 5, 19£36, PLANpING CO(1t1IS5I0Fl PIINUTES:
MO'_"ION BY D1R, KONDRICK, SECONDED BY �fP.. SABA, TO APPROVE THF NOVF,'MBER 5� I96fi,
PLN7NIIlG COMMISSZON Al2N[ITES AS 47RITTEN.
UPON .� VOZCE VOTE, ALL POTING RYE� CHAIRPERSOl7 BILLIP]GS DF,CLARF.D THF. MOTIO�7
CA}�RIEP UNANIMOUSLY.
1. PU[3LIC HEARI�IG: CONSIDERATION OF A PP,ELIMIf1ARY PLP.T, P.S. #86-06,
E 0 5, 5 eing a rep at o t at part o ot 22,
oc 3, oore a.e i s, noka County, Ftinnesota, lying southerly of
a line descri6ed as folloa�s: Beginning at a noint on the northeasterl��
line of Lot 21, Block 3, Hoore Lake Hills, distant 35.00 feet northwesterlv
from the northeast corner; tlience southoiesterly to a point on the south-
westerl�� line of said Lot 22, distant 42.00 feet northwesterly from the
southwest corner of said Lot 22 and there terminating. Except that nart
thereof lying northeasterly of the folloviing described line: Beginning at
a point on the north line of said Lot 22, distant 5.00 feet westerly fror�
the northeast corner; thence southerly to a point on the south line of said
lot, distant 60.00 feet westerly from the southeast corner. Subject to
easanents, if any, and that part of Lot 21 and 22, Block 3, Moore Lake
Hills, Anoka,County, f?innesota, lying easterly, southeasterly and north-
easterly of a line described as follows: Beginninc� at a point on the
northeasterly line of said Lot 21, distant 212.00 feet southeasterlv of
the most northerly corner of said Lot 21, tfience southti•�esterl�� of the most
PLANWItIG C0�1t1ISSIDIJ PIEETIIIG, NOVEIIE3ER 19, 1986 PAGE 2
northerly corner of said Lot 21, thence southYiesterlv, at a right angle
to said northeasterly line, to its intersection with line A, hereafter
described, tlience southwesterlv, alon9 said line A to its intersection
with a line described as beginning at a point on the north line of said
Lot 22, distant 5.00 feet westerly of the northeast corner, thence
southerly to a ooint on the south line of said lot 22, distant G0.00 feet
westerly of the southeast corner, thence southerly, along last described
line, to the south 7fne of said Lot 22 and there terr�inating. Line A is
described as beginning at a point on the northeasterly northeast corner,
thence southwesterly to a point on the southViesterl�� line of said Lot 22,
said point distant 42.00 feet northwesterly fror� the south�-iest corner of
said Lot 22, and there terminating. Subject to easements, if any, a�d the
east 600.00 feet of tlie south 200.00 feet of the north 882.5 feet of the
north�aest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 24, Townshin 3�,
Range 24, located in Anoka County, P1innesota, generally located south of
Hillcrest Drive and north of Gardena Avenue.
MOTION BY PfR. KONDRICf;� SECONDEP BY bfR. BFTZOLD� TO G7dIPF, .T.F!T'. FOR^1AL
RF.ADIP]C, OF THE PUBLIC NEARZNG NOTICE APID OPEA THF. PIJgLIC XT.RP.ING li^_'
7:33 P.�l.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING RYE, CHAIRPF.RSON BILLINGS DECI,FiRBP TIIF,
MOTION CARRIED UNANZAfOUSLY.
Mr. Robinson stated this property was located south of Ploore Lake Hills
and north of Gardena Ave. The property involved three parcels of land for a
total of 3.25 acres. One parcel (2.75 acres) was owned by Oliver Erickson,
another parcel had been subdivided off the back of an existinq sinqle far�ily
lot and t�as owned by the Bacons, and Lot 22 was owned by the Johnsons. The
layout for the plat consisted of a 330 ft. roadvrav with a cul-de-sac at the
end. The roadwav was an extension of the existing 60th Ave. The right-of-wav
for the road was 60 ft. with the actual surface of the road plus or minus
30 ft. The radius of the cul-de-sac was 80 feet in diameter.
and the actual surface area for the cul-de-sac 4ias 80 ft. in diameter.
Mr. Robinson stated there were seven lots, and all the lots were qreater than
9,000 sq. ft. which �ias the minimum required bv code. Al1 the lot widths
were 9reater than 75 ft. which was also the minimum reouired by code. The
plat was laid out such that the road was at the bottom of a ravine v�ith all
the lots on the adjacent side slones. The develooer had stateci that most of
the homes, because of the uniqueness of the site, would be architecturall�
designed homes.
Mr, Robinson stated the property would be serviced by utilities which woul�+
include a 6-inch water line which vras a continuation of an existing water line
from 60th Ave. which would cor�e dotvn and loon up and between Lots 21 and 22.
The looP was consistent with ±he Public Works Department's requirement for
looping a water line. That water line would be 6 inches throughout the nlat.
There would be a sanitary sewer line which would also be looped from 60th Ave.
PLANNIIlG Cf1MHISSIOW MEETI��G, fJOVEh16ER 19, 1986 PA;E 3
Because of the difference in elevations of the existing sanitary sewer line
and the proposed line, the new homes would all feed into a lift,station at
the end of the cul-de-sac.
Mr. Robinson stated the storm water seeMed to be the critical issue with this
plat. Presently there was a pipe which opened onto the pronerty from 60th Ave.
and that water was allowed to drain into the open area. With the plat, the
netitioner was proposing to pipe that storm water into a storm drainaqe oonci
at the end of the cul-de-sac. He stated the Citv fias received a storm drainaqe
plan prepared by Suburban Engineering, and the project must receive Rice Creek
Watershed District approval before the plat is approved. The Citv engineers
are reviewing the drainage plan �iith the developer and are not yet fully satis-
fied that it is a workable solution. They will continue to refine it so the
area will not be affected by the drainage. At this noint, it was not clear
whether all the storm Yrater could be handled on site and a�hether, in fact, a
storm pipe will be needed.
?1r. Robinson stated Staff a�as recommending the followinq stipulations:
1. Ueveloper to provide a refined drainage plan one week nrior to next
plat hearing.
2. Develoner agrees to pay assessments for all public improvements
necessitated by the plat.
3. All proposed waterlines to be 6-inch in d9ameter.
4. Provide easement for storm drainage system.
5. Sanitary sewer lift station to meet Public Works requirements.
6. Provide a plan and necessary easements for private utilitv services.
7. Provide a 20-ft. setback easement along the north line of oronosed
Lot 5.
£3. Developer agrees to preserve trees to the greatest extent possible.
9. Park fees of $1,500 per lot to be paid with each of the seven building
permits.
10. Retaining wall in cul-de-sac right-of-way to be a minimum of 10 ft.
from curb; materials and design to be an�roved bv City Staff.
Mr. Charles Cook stated they are aware of the drainage which seems to be the
major concern. Regarding tfie drainage, it �vas his understandinq that his
obligation was to provide a drainage plan that dealt with the excess water
created from the develo�nent of the site so that ultimately there would not
be any more water leaving the site than nresentiv is leaving the site in its
PLNNfJIIIG COMIISSION FIEETI�dG, NOVEM6ER 19, 1986 PAfE 4
undevelooed stage. They employed Suburban Engineering to do the drainage nlan,
including extensive drainage calculations, and it was his understanding that
drainage plan did meet tliat requirement. The drainage olan was submitted
about a week ago, and Mark Burch, Asst. Public Works Director, was lookin� at
it in great detail because there was an existing flooding concern in this area.
In the event Mr. Burch did not agree with the water retention designed in the
plan, thev do have the capabilitv of retaining approximatel�� twice that amount
of water by altering the design.
Mr. Cook stated Fir. Burch and Citv Engineering were working on cost estimates
for a storm sewer svstem. In reviewin� some of the approxinate cost estimates,
he had deternined that his project could not absorb the entire cost of a
st�rxi drainage system.
"1r. Betzold asked if P1r, Cook would be able to build the tvpes of hornes he
wanted to without very many variances to the city code.
f1r. Cook stated the footprints for the homes within the setbacks were restricted,
specifically on Lot 7. It was possible to build a large home on Lot 7 an�i sta��
witiiin the required setbacks if it was designed oronerly.
P1r. Betzold stated he would strongly urge P1r. Cook to try to keeo the homes
within city code if possible. He asked ho+�� well Mr. Cook w�s going to be
able to '�Preserve the trees to the greatest extend possible ?
Mr. Cook stated the entire site was wooded, and as in any project, they will
tr� to preserve trees. It was in his economic interest to keep the trees
which are part of the appeal for the lots.
Councilman Schneider stated that if a storm se��ier system was needed, would it
be possible to require a bond for a vear or two to cover the cost o�' the storm
seu�er system in case there was a problem?
Mr. Robinson stated that seemed like a viable alternative.
i1r. Billings askecl if it was Staff's understanding that it was the develoner's
responsibility to see that no water leaves the site at a greater rate or
lesser quality than is leaving the site at tFiis time, regardless of where the
water was comin9 from now?
Mr. Robinson stated he believed that was a true stater�ent.
Mr. Robinson stated the pond water elevation was normally at 938 ft. above
sea level, and the walk-out homes are at 941 ft. above sea level, so the o-rater
would probably run between 1318 and 1320 Hillcrest. They want to make sure
that overflow does not get any worse.
Ms. Sherek asked if it was correct that the develoner was not resnonsible to
correct existing water problems. If these homes routinely get water in their
backyards in the soring, the developer would still be able to build his homes
an�i not be responsible for correcting an alreadv existing problem?
PLANNII�f CD�'�IISSIOW MEETING, NOVE�I6ER 19, 1986 PA,E 5
Mr. Robinson stated �e believed that was true.
t1s. Connie Modig, 1330 Hillcrest Dr., stated that because of the way the
lots were laid out in this development, was the develoner olanninq on bringing
in any fill or would he build on the property as it is? She was concerned
about fill because that would affect the water.
Mr. Cook stated they will be bringing in 1,500-2,000 yards of fill which was
not a very extensive amount. This fill would be used primarily to build tha
road base where the existing 60th Ave. terminated and where there was about
a 6 ft.drop. The building pads themselves would not require any fill.
Ms. Sherek asked if any soil tests had been done on the buildina nads.
Mr. Cook stated official soil tests had not been done. He had examinecl the
soil in some areas with a �ost hole digger, and he had found c�ood qualitv
buildable sand under the top soil. However, they u+ill have soil borinqs done
prior to any site work. That is required by FHA.
Ms. �lodig stated she liked the idea of as many trees as possible beinq saved.
She was concerned about the impact on the neighbors in terms of taxes in the
future. The price ranges being talked about for these new homes would impact
on their propertv taxes. She stated buyinc� nroperty on the inside of
Hillcrest Drive seemed to be less expensive than buying property on the outside
of Hillcrest Drive. She was concerned about that and how this develonment
would affect that either up or down.
Ms. P1odig stated an environmental impact statement had been talked about
earlier, and she understood that this propertv did not renuire one; however,
she felt it was possible to ask for an environmental assessment worksheet
that would oossibly answer some of the questions re9arding the affect on the
wildlife, water, etc. She knew these things could not be answered at this
meetinc�, but there were questions that should be answered.
Mr. Robinson stated an environmental assessment worksheet (EAbI) addresses
air quality, water quality, noise, traffic, etc. In
this case, he felt the primary environmental concerns were the sto rni water
drainage and the existing trees. Obviously, because of the develonment,
there was goinq to be less habitat in the area. In his orinion, an FA.4!
would not uncover any new problems. It was up to the Planninn Corrtnission
to determine if they wanted to require an EAW.
Ms. Modig stated she was concerned, not only about the wate r and the trees,
but also about the wildlife. The� bought their home in this area because of
the wildlife (owls, geese, ducks). She stated she was not aqainst the
development, because it was part of progress, but she also believed that
the development had to be done in a proper manner to protect as much of the
wildlife and trees as possible.
PLANNI�JG COF�tISSIQN P1EETING, NOUEMBER 19, 1986 PAGE 6
Mr. Paul Colstrom, 1338 Hillcrest, asked what nrovisions had been made for
a fire hvdrant or lighting.
Mr. Cook stated that a fire hydrant would go in on the cul-de-sac, and
lighting would be deterriined by the Citv.
Mr. Robinson stated a light in the cul-de-sac was city policy.
Mr. Colstrom stated he agreed with P1s. Modig about the concern for the wild-
life. He had �ictures of deer in his backyard, and he would hate to see
much of the wildlife disturbed.
Mr. Betzold stated this �ias a unique piece of property, anA the� �o Yrant
do want to make sure things are done riqht. He was concerned about the
preservation of trees. If the Planning Corriission aprroves this nreliminary
plat at this meeting, it v�ill go on to the f,ity Council. If the Cit�� Council
annroves it, the developer can be9in developing the property, He stated that
once development starts, it is too late to start over. The Planninq f,ommission
has only seen the lot lines. They have not seen the home designs nor will the
City Council when they get this renuest. Staff will be monitorinq it, but �iid
the Planning Commission 4rant more involement than just their vote at this
meeting? Uid the Planning Comriission want tf�is matter brought 6acY, to them
when there were more n7ans regarding the home designs, drainaqe plans, trees,
etc.? Those t•lere some of his concerns.
Mr. Saba stated the trees could be saved in the initial develooment, but SOf'7P-
one who buvs the prooertv two years from no�r coul�i cut all the trees do�-m.
The Citv reallv has no control over that. He felt the biggest concern he had
heard at this meeting was the drainage, and Councilperson Schneider had
su99ested a bond be required so if there ��ere some problems, the money was
there to pay for the installation of the storm sewer. He thought that �iould
alleviate a lot of the concerns. He knew there was a concern for the wildlife,
but he did not know what they could do about that. The developer a�ould want to
be sensitive to that issue because he wants to sell homes. He stated Staff
will be monitoring this and will be working closely with the develo�er on the
type of liousing that goes in on these lots.
Mr. Kondrick asked if it vias fair to insist on the issuance of a bon�? if the
developer receives approval from the City Council that everything in the
project seems to be fine.
Ms. Sherek stated the cost of puttinq in a storm sewer system mav e�ual or
exceed the cost of the pronertv after it is develoned. The i�iea of settina
it up so that the developer could be resoonsible for paying for a storr� sewer
some day did not seem feasible for this size of development.
Mr. Robertson stated that in answer to the inquirv about �reservin9 the trees,
maybe stipulation #8 could be changed as follows: "Developer agrees to
preserve trees to the determination and satisfaction of the Citv Staff."
That stinulation would en qo on recor w�t t e n a an wou e no ed hv
any future purchaser of any lot.
PLANNINr, COt1MISSION Mf_FTINf,, NOVE�16ER 19, 1986 PAGF 7
Mr. Cook stated they have to be very careful in the language because R hor�e-
owner Mav oiant to take down trees for whatever reason. He felt it was a tough
linitation to monitor and was verv subjective. Peo�le who are buying
$2D0,000 homes are 9oing to be very careful about cutting down trees anvway.
Mr. Robinson stated someone could buy the pronertv, rtwve in, and then want to
cut down trees to �ut in a swimming pool. ��las the Citv gning to monitor that?
He felt the best the City could do aias control the buildable site and the
location of the homes, making sure the develper is sensitive to the concern
of the City and the neighbors regarding the trees.
Mr, Cook stated that regarding the wildlife, the plat only borders on about
1/3 of one of the nonds, and there was another very sizeable nond further east.
He did not think there would be a verv great impact on the tiildlife because
there are lots that border all these lots rigtit nov�.
Mr. Cook stated he would be very uncomfortable orith the conceot of nosting a
bond for the cost of a future storm water system, regardless of tahether the
cost was �20,000 or �200,000. The engineers that review the drainaae calcula-
tions are preparing very conservatively;so are the P,ice Creek Watershed District
Board because they have liability. If they aporove something and there is
flooding later on, people can sue the City, so they are not going to put them-
selves in that position. The svstem heing pr000sed by him was designed to
retain the water in its present design and he had the canability of retaining
substantially more than that. It was a nice theorv to qet the site develoned;
but then five years from noVr if there is flooding, everyone is going to noint
the finger at him. Nhat if a fair amount of this water is presentiv percolatin9
here and what if the silt builds up and oluqs that �ercolation, that v+nuld not
be his fault. Or, wl�at if the school builds an 80-car parking lot and adds a
sanctuarv and their designed drainage svsteM does not work causing the floodinn,
then he was the one with a posted bond. This made him very uncomfortahle.
Mr. Cook stated he really believed that the eng•ineers, as concerned as thev
were, were going to make sure his systen worked.
Mrs. Richard Lindquist, 132G Hillcrest Dr., asked tha± if this development
was approved with the proposed drainage plan, but in the future there was
floodinq and a storm water systen �ras needed, who aiould pay for it?
P1r. Robinson stated City Staff would have to determine that a storm water svstem
was needed and staff would have to come up with a cost. Public hearin� notices
would be sent out to everyone affected. The City Council would then decide
who was benefitting from the storm sewer system and those peonle would then
be assessed.
Ms. Sherek stated she did not think the question of �rho were the benefittina
parties could be answered by this hody or even by the Citv Council in an��
concrete way on a hypothetical basis. Engineering dra�oings would have to be
prepared first, a determination of who a�as benefitting would have to be made
before anyone could say who would pay for a system like this. She did not thin4:
they could even hazard a guess at this point in time.
PLA"liVIFIG COhiMISSI01i MEETINf, NOl'ETiBER 19, 1986 PAGf 8
MOSION BY bfR. BETZOLD� SF.CONDED BY AfS. SHEREK� TO CIASF. TXF, pUBLIC HfiAP.2P?G.
UPON A VOICE VOTF„ ALL VOTZNG AYE, CNAZRPERSON BZLLINGS DECLARF.D THF. PU➢LIC
HEARING CLOSED AT 8:50 P.M.
Mr. Betzold state�l he felt a little uncomfortable with this because t�ao ma,ior
variables were not available to ther�. They do not know �ahat the Rice Creek
IJatershed [listrict thinks of this plan, and they do not knoar what inforriation
the City Staff �•�as qoing to come up with reaarding the cost of a storri i��ater
system or other ootions that r�ight be available if the cost of a storm water
syster� V�as nrohibitive, lJhen this goes to City Council, the City Council should
ha��e that full picture. Any recommendation the Plannin9 Comnission makes should
reflect that the Planning Commission dSd not have all the information tliev
needed regarding this development at this time.
Mr. Robinson stated it was within the Planning Commission's right to tabTe
this item and defer anv action until more information was available to them.
Ms. Sherek stated she would be more comfortable tabling this item until thev
have seen an accepted drainage plan.
Mr. Saba agreed. He stated there were a lot of variables in the Arainane plan.
However, he wondered if a lay-over for two more weeks to look at the drainage
pland would create an econanic hardship for �1r. Cook.
Mr. Cook stated any dela,y was not desirable. He did have time limits on his
options on the pronerties. He stated the �iveraiood Plat a year ago did not have
the final drainage plan even at City Council, and the Citv Council anprove�i the
plat subject to the drainage plan beinq worked out satisfactoril�� with Staff.
Mr. Billings stated that was an aTternative open to them, but the Riverwood
site did not involve the concerns beinq expressed for this site.
MOTSON BY F1S. SIIF,REK� SF.C,OP7DED AY AfR. BET20LD, TO TTiBLE FURTItEP. COl7SIDERATION
OF PRELIPI7PJARY PLAT, P.S. #B6-06, VALLEY �OAf;S, HY CHARLT:S COOY. UNTZL TIIF
DF,CEMBER 10� 5986� PLANNING COMMISS2017 MF,F.TING.
Mr. Kondrick stated he did not understand why they were tabling this for t��n
!•ieeks. Stipulation +�1 stated that the develooer had to provide a refined
drainage plan one �reek prior to next plat hearinq, so the developer cannot
go fo rv�ard until this stipulation was met.
t1r. Robinson stated they do not usually have a drainage �lan when thev come
to the Planning Commission, but it has been determined that the drainage is
a key issue and that the present plan does not meet the needs of the neighborhood.
P1r. Billings stated he would be concerned that if the Planning Coirenission
made a recommendation to the City Council at this meeting, that all the answers
regarding the drainage would not even be ready i� time for the nublic hearing
at the Citv Council. He would rather have it come back here so thev knoa�
the drainage questions have been answered before going on to the Citv Council.
PLA�d�JItlG COMr1I5SI0�1 MEETING nOVEt16ER 19 1986 PAGE 9
Mr. Cook stated he wanted to again state that his oroject could not sunport
the cost of a storm water system. If it is determined tfiat a storm svstem
is needed to handle the drainage, his project is dead. His only other alter-
native is to retain the water on site. That deterMination requires in-deoth
engineering study by people qualified in that area such as Suburban Engineerinq,
Mark Burch, and the Rice Creek Watershed District Board.
Mr. Cook stated that at this time,Mr. Burch had not completed his analysis of
the proposed drainage plan. He had made the comment that he questioned the
plan. F1r. Cook stated he has stated that he can increase the retention
capacitv if they need to do so to achieve on-site retention. He has no choice
because he cannot afford the storm sewer. 41hen tfiis goes to Citv Council,
he will iiave to have on-site retention and it will have to be a plan accepted
bv Mr. Burch.
P1r. Robinson stated that any change in the drainage plan could alter the �lat,
the lot lines, easements, etc., so this was not in the state thev would like
to send it on to the City Council.
UPON A VOICF. VOTE� ALL VOTING AYF., CHAIRPERSON BZLLZNGS DECLARTD Tf?F, MOminr+
CARRIEP UNANZMOUSLY.
Mr. Billings stated that when this comes back to the Planning Commission on
Dec. 10, he would like Staff to get the answers to the followin9 two questions
raised by Hs. Modig: (1) Will the new development affect the valuation of
the existing pro�erties in the area? (2) Is there a discrepancy in land nrices
with regard to the inside of Hillcrest Dr. versus the outside of Hillcrest Dr.?
P4r. Billings stated that regardinc� the concern expressed bv the neighbors
about the imnact on the wildlife, he asked Staff to send a letter of inquiry
to the D�lR and also to as� the City Platuralisty Siah St. Clair, to visit the
area.
Ms. ?1odiq stated she would like to be notified when P1r. St. Clair visits the
area.
2. CONSIDFRATIOPI OF A VACATIO�� REOUEST, SAU ¥86-�6, BY CHARLES COOY.:
acate easements or pu ic uti ities escri e as o ows: e south 5 feet
of Lot 22, Block 3, Ptoore Lake Hills and the south 5 feet and the east 10 feet
of Lot 21, Block 3, �1oore Lake Hills, generallv located south of Hillcrest
Drive and north of Gardena Avenue
MOmION BY MR, BETZOLD, SECONDEP BY A15. SHEREY., TO TABLE THZS ITEM IINTZL TNfi
DECEMBER ZD� 1986� P.LNJNING COMMISSION MEF.TING.
UPON A VOICE VOTF,� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAZRPERSON BILLINGS DECI,ARF,D TH5 MOTIOC7
CARRIEP UNANIMOUSL�.
_ __ _
PLAWNIIJG COMNISSIOF� �1EETItJf, fJOVEHBER 19 1986 PA,E 10
3. RECEIVF SEPTEMBER 23, 19£36, HOUSI�lG F� REDE!'EL�PPIE�JT AUTHORITY SPECIAL
MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO RF:CEZVE THE SEPT. 23� 19R6�
NOUSIP7G & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORZTY SPECIAL AfF,F.TING hfINI7TF.S.
UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRPERSON BZLLINGS DECLARF.D THF, IfOTIOTl
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. RECEIVE OCTOBER 9 1986 HOUSING � REDEVELOPPiF.NT AUTHORITY �tINUTES:
MOTION BY MS. SHEREK� SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLP, TO RECEI[�E THT OCT. 9� 1?R6,
HOUSING & REDEVEZAPIdENT AU_THORITY MIN(ITES.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTSl7G AYE� CHAIRPF.RSON BZLLIIIGS DECT.ARF,I� _THE ?dOTION
CRRRIED UNANIMOUSLY .
5. REfEIVE OCTOBER 28, 1986, APPF.ALS f,O�iMISSI�Pi MINUTES:
b10_TION BY P1R. BETZOLD, SECONDF.D BY MR. KONDRICK, TO REC$iVE THF, OCT. 2R, 1986,
APPEALS COAfMZSSION hfINUTF,S.
UPON A VOICE VO�, ALL VOTING AYF., CHAZRPF.P,SON BILLIl7GS DECLARF,D THP. AfOTIOTT
CARRIEP UNANIMOi1SLY.
6. RFCEIVE OCTOBER 28, 1986, EflEP.GY CO�IMIS$I�!I �+IP1t�TF.S:
MOTION BY MR. SABA� SF.CONDED BY PfR. BE_TZOLD� '!'O RECF.IVE THE OCT. 28� 5986�
ENF,RGY COI•f"1ISSION MINUTES.
UPOId A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE, CHAIRPF.RSOP] BZLZINGS DF.CLAI?ED THF AfOTIOC7
CARRZF.D UNANIMOUSLY.
7. RECEIVF �lOVEtiBER 3, 1986, PARY.S 8 RECREATIOtI C(lt?P1ISSION �tINUTFS:
MOTZON BY bfR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO RECF,IVE THP, f70i�, 3� I4R6�
PARKS & kECREATZON COMMISSIOt! MINUTES.
UPON A VOICE VOSE, ALL VOTING AYE� CNAIRPERSON BZLLINGS DFCLAP,F,D TIIF. ^fOTIOt?
CAI;RIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8. OTIiER f3U5If1ESS:
a. Annual Planning Institute
Mr. Robertson stated this seninar was for Planninq Commissioners and
elected officials and would be held in St. Paul on Dec. and Jan. 21.
He stated it was a good introduction to new P7anning Conmissioners an�
ne�i Council memhers. It was also a good tune-up for comr�issioners who
PLANNI�lG COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 19 7986 PAGE 11
have served for awhile to review changes in state law, case law, new
development and practices, etc. He stated he would highly recommend
this seminar and any Corrmissioners who wished to attend should contact
him.
b. Dumpster 5creening Code Change
t1r. Robinson stated this was a redraft of an ordinance change th�t
would affect all commercial, industrial, and R-3 zones. Basically, they
were saying that the dumpster area should be screened from vievr from any
puhlic right-of-way and residential areas, not necessarily from all four
sides, and has to be architecturally compatible with the principal structure.
Mr. Robinson stated posts would he required in front of the corners of all
enclosure sides exposed to vehlcular movement.
Mr. Robinson stated gates nay not be required on an enclosure if the open
area would not cause the receptacles to be visible frorn the public right-
of-way or residential vieo-�. If a gate was required, it should be opaque
and constructed out of sturdy treated wood or a slatted chain link fence.
Ptr. Robinso� stated restaurants shall have fully enclosed dumhsters ti��ith
latching gates.
Pir. Robinson stated receptacles which do not require screening shall he
maintained in a clean and orderly fashion.
!4r. Billings stated he was concerned with the definition for "restaurants",
hecat�se there are other establishr�ents that create the same kind of food
wastes.
P1s. Sherek stated they had the same problem with the unenclosed clum�sters
in R-3 zoning and with establishments such as Super America stations where
waste pours over the top of the dumpsters. �1ayhe they should say dumnsters
that include food wastes should have.latching gates.
Mr. Robertson and �1r. Robinson suggested that 7.D.(d) be reworded as follows;
"Establishments that generate commercial food wastes shall F�ave fully
enclosed dumpsters ��ith latching gates."
Ms. Sherek stated that would include hospitals and nursing homes, for
example, that are not restaurants but generate food wastes.
MOTIOti BY MS. SHERF.K, SECOflDED AY AfR, KONDRZCK, TO RF.COMMEND TO CI^'Y COUf�.�CZL
APPROVAL OF THE DUMPSTER SCREENING CODE CIIAl7GE AS SUBMITTED BY STAFF WITEI
THE FOLLOWIP7G CHANGES:
1. D,B.(d). "ESTABLZSHMENTS THAT GEP7ERATF, COMMF.RCIAL FOOD WASTES
SHALL XRVE FULLY EPCLOSF.P DUMPSTF.R5 WITH LATCHI7JG GFTES."
2. TXE CODE INCLUDE R-3 ZONZNG.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE, CXAIRPERSON BZLLINGS DECLRRF7P THP
MOTION CARRIED UNRNIMOUSLY.
PLANNItIG C�Mh1ISSI0P� Mf.ETI��6, t�OVEMBFR 19, 1986 PAGE 12
AD�] OURIlMENT :
MOTZON BY MR. BETZOLLJ, SECONDED BY MP.. KONDRICK� TO ADJOURN THE MEETZP7G.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, RLL VOTING AYF., CNAIRP£RSON BILLINGS DECLAA.ED TNE NOV. Z4, 2986,
PLANNING COMI4ISSZON MF.ETIIJG RDJOURNED RT 9:40 P.Pf.
Respectfully submitted,
Lyr .ah�
Recording Secretary
_ ��
��`��
��
�1j �- . �tir.�ie,��c�,��u�-�,`
�, ! � ����,�-�:�-_-�
� 6 i n r"s `�c i7l�tf r�;� r'
�/81^"`�-'��, �� �'(/D��'S
��,�
(/��'��
i; >-..c. ��i.(,/�.vri^-�
�: � -� J��t c� L-�
������� , ti�
�si
�/GrYY'�Z.c%��i�—: ��.
� j� / ��'.�
C��'�-� �
� � a � �'�.eF,�.�.� � �--��
!� �S` /��G�'�-s-� �. �`.���%���
C, i � ��hc < �
i 3 � �' 1�,��"f� �
� z� � �r ���<._y;
� 9�� G�����-��
l3 �7 �(-�e�
L�r. ��y°-,-�`=�
/r� �.�-�� -,
�
� -C-� .
i1tiM� `
bt5i , �
__._/�. ti
�;: fY UF FRIDLEY
�iSY UNlVERSI'iY AVE. N.E.
TRIULEY, MN �$b4a2
(612)b71-S�580
'"` • REZONING REQUEST 20A f
VACATION RE�UEST SAV f
1
PLATTING REQUEST P.S. # 86-06
xI�ofsr FEE 5ofl p�{ �'7x�5oo RECEIPr i�%�>G�
SCIiID[nID Pr.A2udIIdG Q�tRUSSI(7N l+�ETn�G nATE //-/9-86
-• a� >� •� � i i•
PROPERTY INFORMATION
PROPERTY ADIRESS See legal description attached
LF��AI. DESQtIPT70N:
i� :� �• �• . . � � ir
..s.a • i •:� k �� � �
REASQJ FUR R$�UFST: A site glan showinq the proposed future use is required for all
rezoning.
App�ication for nlattin� of pronerty and �littin@ of two existing
lots to facititate total new plat, Also vacate easements as
necessary
*�**,�,r*:t*�x,rx:•*��*,c**:**.**�**:**::**.*•:�•**•*�*•*:t�*******:**•*****.******..•*«
OWNER INFORMATION
Continental Development Corporation
NAME (please print) Contract Purchaser ��E
ADLRFSS See Addendum for owners names and si�natures
SIGAY�'iURE II4TE
t*a*�t,►+�aft�*,kr****:ta�x:*s*�a:*tt*:*�**�:*t:x*�::**�*�***���*t��*�***�**��*r��f****
PETITIONER INFORMATION
N7�lE (please prim) Continental Development pHq�E # 757-7563 __ ___
Corporation
� 12093 Ilex Street. Coon Rapids, MN 55433
SIGNARSJRE /�Sf7��•� rCAitaLf . �/u° IIATE
*:**,t**tt****t*t***,t*r*#*:*******�t*****,c*#*t:s*t*t*****:*�*****x**:xa**************t
� i i �� � i � �•� o-�
M �� YI '• • ?�
I7FSiIEU I14TE
D@IIED IIATE
�
, �, �
.
:. �.
ST I Ft.LAT I ONS
1. DEVELOPER TO �MPLEMENT A DRAINAGE PLAN WHICH MEETS PUBLIC WORKS
SPECIFICATI(N�IS.
2. DEVELOPER AGREES TO PAY ASSESSMENTS FOR ALL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
NECESSITATED BY THE PLAT.
3, PLL PROPOSED WATERLINES TO BE 6 fNCH DIAMETER.
4, PROVIDE EASENENT FOR STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
5, S4NITARY SEWER LIFT STATION TO tv£ET PUBLIC WORKS REGtUIRF1�1ENT5.
6. PROUIDE A PLAN AND NECESSARY EASEMENTS FOR PRIVATE UTILITY SERVICES.
7. PFtOVIDE A 20 FOOT BUILDING SETBACK EASEMENT ALONG THE NORTH LINE GF
PROPOSED LOT 5.
8. �VELUPER AGREES TO PRESERVE TREES TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE.
9. PARK FEES OF $15H0 PER LOT TO BE PAID WITH EACH OF THE 7 BUILDIN6
PEf�I l TS .
1H , I�TAI N I NG WALL i N CI.L DE SAC R I GHT-OF-WAY TO BE A M I N I M..hf CF 1� FEET FRCM
CURB; MATERIPLS AND DESIGN TO BE APPROVED BY CITY STAFF,
HJBLIC HEARIIx;
BEEORE 'II�E
H�PiNNII�G �MP1fISSION
Notice is herekr� given that there wi11 be a Public Hearing of the Planning
Coa�miission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue
Northeast on Wech�esday, Nwenber 19, 1986 in the �imcil Q��nber at 7:30 p.m.
for �e purpose of :
Consideration of a Preliminazy Plat, P. S#86-06, Valley Qaks, by
Qiarles Cook, being a ceplat of that g�zt of Lot 22, Block 3,
Moore Lake Hi11s, Anoka Cotmty, Minnesota, lying southerly of a
line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the
rortheasterly lin�e of Lot 21, Block 3, Moore Lake Hills, distant
35.00 feet northwesterly fran t2ie northeast corner; thence
southwesterly to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot
22, distant 42.00 feet mrthwesterly from the southwest aorner of
said Lot 22 and there terminating. Except that g�rt thereof
lying northeasterly of the follawing described line: Beginning
at a point on the mrth line af said Lot 22, distant 5.00 feet
westerly fran the northeast wrner; thence southerly to a point
on the south line of said lot, distant 60.00 feet westerly from
the southeast oorrer. Subject to easements, if any, an7 that
�rt of Lot 21 and 22, Block 3, Moore Lake Hills, Anoka County,
Minnesota, lying easterly, southeasterly and northeasterly of a
line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the
northeastezly line of said Lot 21, distant 212.00 feet
southeasterly of the most mrtherly mrner of said Lot 21, thence
southwesterly, at a ric�t angle to said northeasterly line, to
its intersection with line A, hereaf ter described, thence
southwesterly, along said line A to its intersection with a line
described as beginning at a point on the north line of said Lot
22, distant 5.00 feet westecly of the northeast corner, thence
southerly to a point on the south line of said Lot 22, distant
60.00 feet westerly of the southeast corner, thence southerly,
along last described line, to the south line of said Lot 22 and
there terniinating. Line A is descri.bed as beginning at a point
on the northeasterly northeast ourrer, thence southwesterly to a
point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 22, said point
distant 42.00 feet mrthwesterly from the southwest cozner of
said Lot 22, and there terminating. Subject to easements, if
any, and tl�e east 600.00 feet of the south 200.00 feet of the
nozth 882.5 feet of the northwest quarter of the northeast
quarter of Section 24, �wnship 30, Range 24, located in Anoka
Co�mtY, Alirrnesota, generally located south af Hillcrest Drive and
nocth of Ga�den� AvPnue.
Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportiu�ity at the
above stated t.ime and place,
ST�IE BILLII�GS
Q�AIRI�N
PL�A[a]It� �MMISSION
Puhlish: Nav�ber 3, 1986
Nw�ber 10, 1986
�1:3
P.S. #86-06
Valley Oaks
SAV #86-06
Charles Cook
Continental Develo�nt Corp.
Charles Cook
12093 Ilex Street
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
Faith Acade[ry
1401 Gardena Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Douglas Johnson
1495 Gardena Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
xicnara rrencn
1469 Gardena Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Dorothy Ba�cter
1465 Gardena Avenue N.E.
Fridley, P'�7 55432
Charles Croon
1437 Ga�iena Avenue N.E.
Fridley, A7N 55432
Wayne Monson
1423 Gardena Avenue N.E.
Fridley, M6I7 55432
Dean Johnson
1413 Gardena A�enue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Neal Jenewein
1342 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Davis Hamernick
1340 Hillcsest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Paul Colstran
1338 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
George Baoon
1336 xillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
4lalter Jdinson
1334 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Frirllav_ MN 55432
NII�ILING LIST
Michael Gannucci
1332 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Ricl�ard Modig
1330 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Joseph Hinytzke
1328 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Richard Lindquist
1326 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Haaard Bergman
1324 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Rabert Knudson
1322 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
David Lucas
1320 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Arvid Hansen
1318 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Gary King
1319 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
EYidley, MN 55432
Harold Hanson
1321 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Roc Nelson
1323 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Donald Nyvold
1325 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, D'IN 55432
Delores Ponessa
1327 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
1C
Planning 11/6/86
Council
Edwin Senun
1331 IIillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Yoava Klucsar
1337 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Lawrence Morris
1345 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Douqlas Heimstead
1349 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Harold Tha�son
1351 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Rose Peterson
1353 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Reuben Watlov
1355 Hillcrest Drive N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Bron-Eric Incorporated
3231 Central Avenue N.E.
Coltmibia Heights, MN 55421
Wesley Long
1560 - 60th Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Gilbert Sakariason
5965 Oakwood Manor
Fridley, MN SSA32
Chester Buiznis
5963 Oakwood Manor I�.E.
Fridley, MN SSA32
Janell Benson
5951 Oakwood Manor N.E.
Fridley, MN 55A32
Eino Efraitt�son
5990 Oakwood Manor N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
P.S. #86-06
SAV #86-06
C. Cook
Page 2
Charles Dorcas
5960 Oakwood D4anor t3.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Donovan McGUire
5928 Oakwood Manor N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Maxy Steven
5926 Oakwood Nlanr�r N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Stephen Shorma
5916 Oakwood Manor N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Steven Benson
5910 Oakwood Manor N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Stephen Dah]man
1499 Gardena Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Bailey Tiller
1535 Gardena Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Kenneth Baker
5925 Oakwood Manor N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Gerald Burrv.a
5924 pakwood Manor N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Rnnald Scholl
1508 Ferndale Avenue N.E.
Fridley, NID1 55432
Otto Gaupp
1504 Eerndale Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Francis Hunt
1505 - 60th Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Wayne Herrig
1511 - 60th Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
ArrlrEw Riciiert
1522 Ferndale Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
James Allen
1541 - 60th Avenue N.E.
Fridley, NIN 55432
Ronald Long
1521 - 6�th Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Inring Olsen
1511 Ferndale Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Gregory Johnson
1505 Ferndale Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Ellena Duval
1560 Ferndale Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Roger Sorsoleil
1561 - 6Dth Avenue td.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
1D
�Y ►,�!NF , { Z� . lE
�� _ � - �N
� / �, �. � fr+ 5...�.
�1 �� - - -�39 9�yz ch �2�_.= ,��1 - --
. . , .
:�� `.- _ >. » „ 61 S 4�
� ._ .'h, t�' (P' ,`�, �l tfi • `�, � ��,.. �� -° '+: `
_ ' '�� ' MO. � `'' '"� ° , �°, . ` '�, . i
) ,: . �' �� � � ° . �
, � n„ ��p ,
• �7 ti !' [ N .. ;F ' � � , �
, 4 � � _ ^ i
, _ � ` HI��' �� CREST � �ORIVE � � - �� �� �` ' ; Ma •
�1� s `�1 �' ��� - ,� , w ::� 4s . ..
P �,, .s � l� � �s+� c -�� p+) ru> ' �p� __ _ � '� � � .-.
, ��' r � c �� 3 z � ,` `� � ., , d��'Ri
9 �°,q` . .:, : �=. � , � .
�. t ,,, , _
- -- �� ' ` i 1) ,15� , � $: �� ,: `- ,�� �,�) �g� '4 :: ` '��- i
..` ��0 �`'Iil `11� U Z° e' i�;) O 4 + � a �. .:.
�, , ,, ,a �P p � �
� . � ^' „ ,�. :
v� u /S r . ' : . °` na Y "w. � . � �.
.1 .e ' _^1v� .,• • l� i _c(�y�Q `y� � � n� W� � - .
F �,n� � � ' 4' 6 SA A<
_ _., � • �N) 'c ' , . ' f � t � � � Q3 �a- j .
.- � M'� ~� 4 .: � .'N.':1{'}.'L'•',•�••{ � > iik� � �� �
N' r Iy.�.:�: A4:•:�:' r " � s�
F.ST ' � " _ �, ,�r. .::•..�: •�.
e '* �l /Y ♦ 11 A:4 � :':: ��:�ULL1. w.
' � a�l ;�1 IS�� II'� �R�� • .y �•}�•�'.�'•�f.1�• i�• •Y 4 �!_����1}
yl. y, y ry�J1 . _ 1f•.` . •�}.t..`. L. .�11 .. '.I ... . .
$}i:i,�.v}r {`{y.4'i,�,ry:% xi} r., r � � .
�5�; � . t . ::::SL�•�}�lS:•.���..�{1:{f�.+:W�s� ��}%��:?t'£`�ir.�;'•�i �Q � �s: ��r� .5�
h• v.• Lv.. f�{},'rv�}•rr¢•.L+•'• y. :' .
Ll � �':r4} v}•: � }r r • {:; y•» };'y,','v •$: •. x:..tiv'� vs}k•. .� E
a �?�{��.;{i}. h1: } t rr`.•' }r.,.•: t:•
{�}�{' 1},:Sr Si. r � r / {+Y?$�r�rr �� • $,r .i
�•rr,•. �♦ �..�F�'� �3,¢�;�'..'.''�'''`.�.'...t::v��;fr:}•:.. .i �A N C
.�.{ �..Y{Y.'f ��if.:.. A' J 1 :LY ~1��1.' � .
. ♦ �}}•'�: J �•-.,v+��,� ��:•:�{y}:. � }••L�1} 1 }4 � . � I
� .^�i�;i;:C�'v}{rre�syy'��� �xr.r{�i f,r}or,y . _
{ vY rr,'r• sa.�iD'{ r•r'� ti•° v`;r;.:•: ��rvr..y + .
. �'{�{.. •• }:'�}:ih{rf, r•;ir rv l{{.•���{•�;�Ir:}A1f I' .'� o�. 4`. -
��v i ...�...4 r•
� � ,. _ ,..: � ,�, D Tl,�
, � � ,, :,
� t� �,�> ,a« „�,
�! V �n� �� .� . .
�IELpLAN �� G �4'DE S �:�; �., a i-r���o� �--.�=, ` _
(7i .r � � n.e.�.t, r��l: r „ c �,
��e� .,i!• � �> pv ,�,,
EcE ENrAR ° �s «l�, � ;,. z
� .. } AROE , �., :. , ,.,,.
, _� . - ;, ._.,, r� SC OOL ��,� �, �oa � � � � � .
�_,_ - - - _ • :,,...a..� .,. . \ � :
Ji� , 1 • ✓,�� ,,.i: �,bqb�1. j ,i,..� k � �,� .
I� m t ^ �� i�,� � . _� :�/4 . 3
� , D r'
c�o_ '�0 r�) 75c s � Zt35 �:��� ,� r.. X. ... � � . ��� � � a
_ ._�5 ti [
'f) igJ � : � rir
�... _.la., „� .s:� i-v_'z+ss�
" :A. I //
� ' psl
.. !�l
- . - J! _'__""'_"""':, .Lf,� �S) ^,�i ���
♦• ra
r
' _—���� __—T �/�Q� �1) �t� ;
. _ �,. •
0
r� !7/V!7
i
LOCIq►TION MAP
�,
:, ,
I� (
f
f
, �s�v � 9,, 31 32
���; �
l3J�
i Ll ,�
/isloJ {
� 3 ;.�'
,,
�
ti `
'1'1 S
. Q�
•'1l 7�
+ ..
� iiii���'1 �:i: •Qti� .
�a�/��, ���� .��Q. . '•
�u� ���� .
pl5�6.•..�.u�� i�
• •�p��Y"I
.. - : ��� eee�, �p
^ g�ii� . e.■a?.� ��1' , ���� �� �����
.� � •... ..... � �^d����i► �
• u�ven�m M_I.�li[�
...�w...0 . r
('T • t•� � • . iiiii�i '�
::::�i.•
�s����+9��' ; �� ....::.-� � :��dOD �
(�, / �....��.... •
, ......_r:..._.....
' � •. � . �
F,� F�"fI. �_,� � — A�������� . rs.� O .
a7�f� � � � � �. P7 j.����� � _� . . 1�] ��i � ,Fa
>♦ ♦♦
♦��• � ♦�"•1�� i r
► � � � ♦ / ♦ 4 �• r � ♦ r'�` . � I� � i�:�UI.yU1�1• R�
♦����♦ 1��•i��� ��s�g��_°° ����
►������♦ v ♦���♦ I /' !� �
♦��������/' � N������ � �11�
►��������� • � i ����• .�C•
♦�������♦ ` ♦����Y-�v .��'���s �p �
►�������♦
♦ � � � � � � �� ���1���►���J���i , i :.'eO�. '�ii� , '�� , ':r �����F�
►��i������������ •_►�r����.� � �_�. �ww�we��Ci7 .�,�_' �fL�._�_
/
�l
- � a , , i - � , �_ i, u {
� 3N/ L4S �N S ° e io � 2 �i 8 ' e �. 5 �
£arr� c � o.w� . 5
6 ti
1 ' r L �
a •�
.3 5 C.� � ' 6 t
H/AD D/ 4 i ry � n i i5 u.y u. n w
,� 3 > B 4 3 z � 1 2 ? 9 B
c•
IST
l , ! ¢ /I 6 1 6
r(j M'i ' i � 4 � Q`!
� � K
�� s
' N1L�CR T DRIYE ".r I y! ,
/ � I 9 � 5
� ' t � 1 i r 1 � .s t$ - � x e Q�
� zo .i C - D � � ��S :
il 1
.o K .) � ' (1 S . � � il
Q /r " y �f �
u � tr'e ��� � �I� � �/J F
� HILLCREST Zl .y �i �' �': � eb�o0 � ,
i� /u
n G C ' / � 7 ) r i0 �-S � 5 i
�KE � 4. ♦' N Ji I f��E z'n �, �ro-;
�c ��,?° ,: �, - . .' 3 � J'� 9O1 , Q ,F
p „ �s • �' '
:�y; r t 9'r� � �T' �' � ' _ �.
J,q � � 4 � 1/ IIG 7 .� � �
��0;S
o-� ' �pF+�Gp �� � �_ �'- �1 �L.( - � tr z.�, (� �a.
�, "E t�' ��VU Ci � � � �'3 '�' 1 Y �,�i
i4�� , �' A ✓,i �f• Y . i
GA H 4 � � `� P�,l �
�i �- �i ar:: � 3' 3I h,' t '1
�' Ie l)IM� � 1f�1 29
h�
; �. . . . � � t - r _ �
3. 'e � � r�> t J i� : . .
f ¢ e �
�`' �' ° s ' GRACE H/GH __ � o� ° ,:,.�,; ;�,, K
,> � � ; �, , , > ,
�° y� � „ � � , - � � � .�-�,. °
Rl� '�l / N 1 _ 3 �G J T_'_- J N ' f, f Li _
,, '�'� E__ ' w` ` SCHOOL ADD/T/ON f�'� I M���C
;, F 9 � P K .:"� w
.� — '� �, J:
' = , �� �
� � �, � ,- �' -
, •r
� �. �Q�'�� '� � ;; � � - - 0. � � � � � �:; , � �.
.,�,� �{ � 1 i��. 1t � i� p�i�R +�`, y.1�F �
� �: ,�.�����',�8 ;;.��.��u , � . � �. , "/N . . . ,. .'.'.`.
e o �� , . 9 � y � ' . . . . . . . .
TH Y i� " z • • • • • • • • •
RT • • • . • • •
, ��� i. � . • . • . • • • • •
� — '.. . . iI� � � 2 i. � • • •� .y�• • •
l � 5 • s• �j� o ••.
� '�,i�slw'>��� � .� p � ' Z • � ��• • i��•�.�.�.
e �'5[ z • ��� . . . .
---�--.-.+� . I �.: � i5 /'/"� � S • � S • • • •
.,
._,
.�� ---�r��-., � o �-- - 1G
, .- -, �, __ -
-_ ;�. � n � :-.
;�-
..; �� � �� �� � � ��� �-'
_,
�r r� ' � ; !� � —_ i� ._•
.�. i � F'� ,r
��� �-- , �. �,i
��+ '
•T- , 4 � _
...- � �', - ---ooc. �.--
� • ''r- � - i_'� �_' 40 `"�_ � [f
�\ , i � \ `
o. � \\ \� � � \ �
1 � ��-� � s �� � \ V � �� �_ A � .�
1 n�l � � . � \ \ �� \ � � � �\ `� ^ � Q
� �� � � ' '•s � \ �
r-� i i j. �> ��\` \\ \ \ �� \\'�-o z �
� � � s � ° � ,� ! � � A � �
\ , � . � , �,=,-�., ; , a
o �� , � � �' �� ', � `t�. i ' � ` � 1-
r .� �`, � �
N � � �� \ �, j I 1 �i �+ �1 ��\ \ � � \ \ p\� �, �- �
��/ � � �� � y V � � � � � V���`�� � �, ii�
/�� �� ���� 1 �� � ` �5 � � \ \\\\� � � `� a v i
� i � \ � r�� �\�\ � �j --�
-'��� � \ \ '�, 1 , �-o� � � \ \ � \\ -,n , � (� `'-
- �'--'� �� '�1'w � 99 � \� us \ . Cn � � �
_\, �\ ,`N`� ` \1 \ 11�' \ . Q C y_:
/ � / V1 N v°� \ � \ \ 1 I'� � � v v � ��'
� � J „_
��� � < � ���� , ��� � �s� 1 \� 1 1i�,` � __ -� ��
i
/ \ \ _ � � �� �� N o' m I ('�,� � o--� .i
�/.\ � ��� M l�` � a1 � � � \\ \- � � ._.
\� c � \
.i al � �� ��y�
,�� � � � \`\,11i _�, I! 1 � � � a y�
. � a<� � � Il� \ , � ' � F ,
�� ,, ✓, , ' �� � , ,. •�, � > ,� � ,�o � a ;
� ' °� �. �'� � ,'b., ., � , � r�1 i
=y� �� � ��� � �' � ��/ „ n� \��° ���V � i�1° �
��� j'( '��. N � � � \� l / � � � \� � J „
h � �a
� \ v�� \`\ \ '. �\\ i �/ / < j\\\\�\ I\\ ,,`O N ow�
�
1` � _
' J
\ r ' ,� � ,/r r � 1 � _� ' �' � � }, 'I'^ > �,'
_
`\�� �' � ,� �; 1 � � i z m j �\�� \ —cUn °��
,
_ � '� l � ,so, �- �� ` ;� ��� ° _ � �
� i ' ' � �� N ���-� ��i � i � i � � r . ° '��� � ��� � � ' � " � _ �
� � ti i o ,
;
� r � � i ; �� � ,�� �."" � , �g_ i
� � � `r�� �, ( ! 1 ��1 1 � � 1 `� �.y5 \ �.
�
i �
r � \ � 1
�11�'1 1 i:� i ` � / / ��{I l ���\ 1 �` Ze' / � �� � — - =-'
`tti-'. , + ',� �` I 1 � � 1 �� � \{�-�# �� , �
�V� � � '�� �� �1 � 1,� 1�1� 1 � v°- �� ��� ^"� �� <�
�
� 1' � � i �`C
1 �'��� /�' — a. I� �I t� � 1��11 ��� �1 �� � 7 �\ � i m ���� �` :='
1 ` 1 �� t' �, t� c`� � ,�, i � � I I 1 � '� � � � � � � � �-�.
� i� 'i�I��ii� I �4 �� � "�� � o
; II N � �
, _
'� '� , ' � �����i� �>>/ \ z
�� '_; , i � , � � I �\ w ;1
�
1 ` 1 1 � � �.
1� --�� ���� �� �� ��I�l l � �w___�� 1�=
, i . ,i i I / � �
� �' � � �� � � / � � 1 / / I
�,�� �'� Y' 1 '0� ��,+� r i��(I � l�l l G� z I
_ ��,1 �'1� , ,�, `' � � ��� �„�� �ii � � ��� _--- ��
I ` ��� �
��, = 1 � � ,� 1,�, �� � , �, ��,,r �, ��; � 1, � =� �-� s
s�or � � �� � �"'1 � � /I �� �� �'�i � �.�� � �
� s'� � � ( 1 �5 � / `Ir C� oo — ----1- -
' ��� � � ��� ����� �� � ..
1 `—T ', ;�. � CC. 1'--`� � i i i � �� i , /
�� � ', `1 � .=-• i i � / � � 1 \ � � �
�� , 1 � 1 i� � ` / N � \\ /,�
� � � � � �� �� �� l
� �����;, __ -,ti ,
,; ,,
� �; � � �
' � � � �, ,-�
� ____
' ,
:2_ ;; _ , . � . 1�1�
,�- � _,
,._ � -.�
, , � ._�
la! 4,�-s.,�.�- .__—_ _.
'T' -
.�� /, �,_ _ --00£ _ '
_1_.�. ' ' /.� - \QOZ `�
.— � ' , �� \�.
— `�� N ' �' I \ �\`t \\ �e� �n Z
� � ' �� `. \ . °c " l�
� �BI � t r> h9 . � �� � � �\ � L Q
. �i ii .� � \ � � t �
� A � 4' �
\ ' \ '
� ` � I ` \ � .`n ,f' ` \ � q _ V
C I'� � `%,� � r,� ��. �� ~ �
Y T
/
__ . � i�i . ;� C b�, \ ` �\ � _ t.
`\ S � � \
�
�',1 � �. �' ���; � � � -
. ` `� � S N � 9 \ �
. � \\ . � ;N`��.1� 9 ' \ �. .� ��� � � % �
o �y�"" � �\ [� �
� N t. S�T�� < O � \ �.
� . � �._: '� �� •�,j' � � ° I � � (� � .
. � ,,.y `` \ � � tJ ot ..��'f�', o �—� ' i
� ���. �. � ��N .����� �Y� �� � � .
, � �� . � � � .' � 1 � � �� � '1 � � .
�� '�� ' � . '�\ �t � � -o
i
, �;r: / V.. j ; p� /4 � ,. ',B6 � •. �
_, . .y- �.� -�� � � � � � � j ; m � a 4 �V �
`���, ti ' � °. � �\ �
J
� i a �n m cv
� ` � / , ��\� � � O
� '� , � � ° a VA��� ' O
� '' ✓ I � \ � cz�
—�—r � � � i 1 � „s _ �. All Cn
a 1 � —� .� � �� � .
� � � � ��,� : I �1 ' V' � � v
F' N �z ��"�L_ ��=_e\ � , `��_
� � -;,� � � , �� � ��A � .,� �� _ ,
� ,.;� � ��� � �� �, ,� - _ ,-
�•, i � �
� �,�_ � � ,� ����� ' � =_
, �
_-.V. .. �i_ 11� \�' a2' qp���,\ �_ �- ._
l 11 � �l \ � �
� __; �'" � ��� �� il� � � � � � � � � ; � ��� �
� � �. � � � �� � � t 1 �V;i F— _
� � � - � N i '�i ' i �� i'i , � i i � ,'' 1 �� � z ; -
� � � � �i',-��tiii�l�i������,. �p
����Iit iJ � l�/; N � ,-.
� � _ �'�,; �j�����i� f���iy � �� w � �.
� NI I� I�J 1 I r�� � v� ��.
�� �"1[ I J�� ( 1�/ ��� l w---'
� - ;oi, T �` ��! / 1 I� ��l ;� � 1
—� J, _ � - � �,F i ����1 / /� �j� � � z I
� � -�, � d �/"1��/� ��l � ��.� -- /
�„< Z_ �� : �� ,,;; , N � �I!(1{� fl/ 1 � ; ��� /
_� � 9 t �,. �'���� p� I � f �'��� I
�
3���,0 �. 1 '� ; .. �� �. �� �, , �� � ,� �1 � 1 '�_
�� �� � � � , C � `- , � a� �' ooz � -- -- E
� - �'-- `�b --f� --� , ; § . —�. i
�_: . --, � ,� � l
-- �'' •=" . 1 �� �� ! '' ' � � ` �
� �' �
� � � N ��.� ��
l �� ., /i �a
� _ .�
_ _. _ ___— - _� �
, --s -- �� /
� �r
�� ,
,
I ---
� I
!
�
z
�, ' ' �
> �
a;
s ;` �
� --� - — ----- —
s ------� ,
_ � �
: �
..T ; �
�,.., _ N, --�-IJN bVv - �— da61FSl�lO_�_ �
�c-., r. ___---- -� - � -------... _.--'-�- ---- � �- .
. .• .�\n 1 � �
� t;�� T �
`YZ � ti �J` 1
� 4 w � � �r �� ... � � Y ��
U y � � i
r �
--, °-. ::J ; r o� F o r.
� �� ar�� � « �� �� � �
\ r
\ � ?N �T-�d; � °� ��� I
� r ° 8
� ` i r � o
� �
-����� • � � ��� (
��
- _,--� / �
� ,
y � �y y 2
t- � '�'S � " i ? .
y ' � Kd. k / <O� Q �
� , `
- �� � i i v) � 0 .
Y � ,`'. c/ � p �
�� tl � '� � >, 1,� �., �1 �
? � i� �-' /' ' �'y'1 M 4
.. .. :�� v i > v. I
�� � � ��.n Fn N
�� :. " 1 ' Q
� _ � V Y � l' � CI
�' \ � f
� ; � ��
� �:
` �,.
1 W _ ( �
J � �
J LL � ?
� � � LL � �
/ N ,
Y �
G
� � ; / I 41 �
� / � .,
` � ' '
� x� / � - - ? .,
_ ��
/ i I " = 4
\'�' � ,� � ' � v V
� _ � u
� � �
1 �
_ �
� ='l
s� �_ — �!
y , � _ � �
� Y1 Q
� � `" �\ � I
�, ��
�; �-^��
;;
;
�
�
�
J ��
�j 2
j VI
_ �
� Q
1
�
o;
}`
� ,
F �
� Y
y F
s 0 r
�Vl G
u ?
O �
��2,�
�?
F w j
J\ � �
Y 4� `
J
J p� •1
,G�1
W
0
�
.�
�� � � .
,�
.� _>��
.:�.:.�z ;.
1� �)
� 11
\�
S
� `.
�
�
�
lI
Q
a
V
Q
Q
0
1J
Continental Development Corporation
120�3 Ilex Street
Coon Rapids, P`?< 55433
C`ctober 23, '14RE
Jim Robinson
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue ?c�;
Fridley, I�•'.n 55432
P,�.: A�plication for platting of Valley Caks
�ear Jim nobinson:
�,nclosed is an applicatio;� to plat anrroximatel�,� 3.25 acres of lar.d
located just south of P`oore Lake �states. Tbis site is presently
zoned Fi-1 and my reauest for plattin� is consister.t with t"is zcnin�.
�he total plat consists of what is presentl.y three senarate narcels of
land. I initially obtair.ed, under purchase cor.tract, 2.?5 acres ef lar,d
that was land locked. I then maoz eiferis to obtain e roe�wav access
frcm t�r.e ajoining prcrert;� owner cf Lot ?�, 31ock 3 ei P�oore �ake "ills,
Geor�e and Candice 3ucon.
Throu€?; these efforts and ne�otiations, Gecrpe and Candice deterr�ined
that because of the excessive size of their lot and because cf the
iope�rap!��, a �ubstantial elevation dron in their rear vard, they +,rould
prefer to split t'oeir lot in � m�nner that allews for an additional
lct ir. mv nev, plat. Geor�e then approached ris neighbor, 'r;alter and
Ha2e1 Johnson, and through furt?�er ne�otiations the Johr.sons deterrined
the�� woulc co the sane.
The Bacons, Johnsons ard = have reache� ar. a�reerent for economic
comnensation and I have �roviced copies of these agreements wit� this
application.
ks is snown on my apFlicaticn for plattin�, all o? t?�e fee owners o�' t!;e
three parcels of lar.d involved have executed this application,
I�'ark Burch �nd Jon Thcrpsor. from �itv �ngineerinr n�ve k�alked tris site
with me and have expressed their feelin� that the preject is sounc
anc feasible in terms of en�ineerir.� anc ir. that the lot� �till be
desirable.
as this plat is cesigne�, it preserves the existirE natural toroPra.ph,y
and it will be a comrlimer_t te the communit�r.
reel free to cor_tact me if you have any corcerns, 757-7563.
:ie�etiectfull,y,
'/��Uc < , f �l �
�Charles �. Cook, Fresident
Cor.tinenta.l Development Corporaticn
enclosures
�
sl/$'BQ
• san��o �uauaiojanap aso;aq paTtalsu� st mals�Cs �ajlno st�{3 1�{l
aznsua o1 eaia 8ucpuod stul 3o c{lnos pae lsea a�{z o1 satlsadoid
ac{3 }o saadojanap tetl�alod ai{1 l{1LM aleu�p.coo� 01 anaq Ijt.x a:N
'00'000`££$ �<Ialaw?xoadde
st 1ailrto STL[j �l2TjjElN� }o �so� ��atuano.zdurt paleuc?lsa at{y
eaas stc[1 uto.i; �tEME acrzt uuols e o�ut pataze� aq o1 .ca1EM uuols
ssa�xa .xoitE Ti?:� y�?�[M adtd �aL�no c{�ut-zT e pau8tsap a.1e�{ a,K
•sluawdotanap .xau �Cq pa�nqt.zluo� sa1E,x uuo1s Teuoi�tppe ;o
a8sc�tezp aznsua ol papznozd aq laj3no uE lei{1 ati?IQ 1saz�TTtH ��i�
satlz�ozd I211aapzsaz Sutlstxa aBEUtep ptno� ia�sM a,zaun+ lutod
e ol asti 1ou op puod a� ui sjanat za1eM ainsut o� .zapio uc
let{3 Taa; an{ •puod siyl o�ut Bu�MOj; .za3eM }o �(1?luanb a�{3 uo
1�a�;a ue anBu pinor+ aaas Buipuod siy� ;o apts qznos zo 1sEa ay�
iat{1ta uo luau�doianaQ •Tooq� .(.isluawat3 auapse� ac{1 ;o c{lioa
aase 8inpuod at{1 uo s��edu� Te?1ua�od aq1 paipn�s anaq aM `eaie
euapze� aul ut pasodo.zd 8uiaq s�uaiudotanap aq� ;o uotlEdt�t1� uI
p-��r i�
�{ ��
o.° °o �
°oo
s3uauidojanaQ eazy euapie� io; ueid a8eacs.zQ =.L�3I'Hf1S
986i `9Z i�i�anoN
aol�aiiQ sxio,r� �zjqnd �issy `u�infi "I x3�NI
� 3.L`dQ
�1Q02L3
Tb£-98Md iol�aizQ sK.zoM �tiqnd�`eSOL3 '� in{of �O,I.
u�)ti�
wnoniveaw�+M
B�ItiOM �1'f9fld
d0
31erdota3a�a
330.�111�
�_
CITY OF FRIILEY
MEMORANDUM
C / tY N/��/R{U-�
4p; J � ay R�k.ilic Works Director
'� f
FRDM: Leon Ma�en, City Assessor
SUHJECT: Proposed Valley View Acres Plat arx3 related questia�ns
L1ATE: NWeuber 19r 1986
1he properties facing Hillcrest Dtive and Oakwood Manor have been valued,
b3sically with res�ct to their frontage and neighbochood. No special
consicieration has been given to the existence of the vacant area, now
FroF.osed for platting. If the platting goes through, there will wntinue
to be no effect on value, of these properties, except to the extent that
lan� aceas are reduced to acoamodate the developnent.
�he reason for not considering the open land, in the value process, was
because of the nncertain disposition of the parcel. It hadn't been
dedicated for ar.y public puzFose. Under private ownership, it's ultimate
oevelognent has been an ongoing uncertainty� even though it might have
affcrded some folks a temForary Fark-like amenity. Platting and
develognent of the Faccel will cceate a disposition certain, however,
will elimate the teuporary private park amenity; one influence balancing
the othec.
tiithout doing a oomplete study of all registesed plats in Ftidley, I know
of no plats that desiynate specific areas or g3rcels as undevelopable.
'Ihe develoFability or undeveloFability of a� Faccel is virtually always
a tert�Forary state. Outlots, such as the two in the Gena-Rae plat, were
usually oesicy�ated as such to pzcwide foz a future ewnomically feasible
usE.
Most plats since the 1950's designated outlots to encomg3ss the less
desizahle areas not ewnanically feasihle to 8evelop at time of platting.
4b accomodate the Fark prwision ordinance, these outlots were usually
dedicated to and accepted t� the City foz Fark purposes.
The ecomonics of land pretty well dictates what is buildable oz
develoFable. Recently, extra deep lots, that contained large areas of
ia�accessable land, have been, pravided access and developed because the
scarcity of buildahle lots in Fridley has made the cost feasihle. These
are areas such as Aud Sub t108 and #129 betveen 73rd St. and Onondaga and
Springlake Park Lakeside between Stinson and Lakeside Drive.
4here still rer�ains a oonsiderahle amount of land that is to irre9ular oi
law to eooranically develop. These areas, however, will undoubtedly,
sane dayr be developed.
�
�-
1L
� CITY OF FRIDLEY
�6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E.
FRIOLEY, WIt1 SS432
(812)571-34b0
'' •-� �EZONING REQUEST ZOA � �,: 2
� VACATION RE�l7EST SAV ,IE 86-0�.
PLATTING REQUEST P.S. �
R�UEST F£E ��S'O PARK FEE RE�IPP #�,/ :f 9
`• y1 7�� '� 1 1 �• I 1 �' I 1 �• 7
S�IDULID CITY �IINCIL MEE'i'ING IIATE
PROPERTY INFORMATION
PROPERTY AD�S See legal descziption attached
LF�AL AES(ItIPi'ION:
• : •«
•.o.a • i
RRACf/AQDIT7DN
R$�UES'1'ID ZONING R—�
RFASQd tUR R$UFST: A site plan showinq the proposed future use is required for all
rezonin .
We request the utility �and drainage easement located alon� the south
property line of Lot 21 and 22 of N:oore Lake Hills be vacated, as a
part of the replatting of this property into Valley Oaks.
**�****,r�*�***�**,r:*****tr***r*�**,r*:**r****:*************�****,r*******:*�****,r**�**
OWNER INFORMATION
Continental Development Corporation
NAME (please print) Contract Purchaser pgONE # 757-7568
ppgtf5s See Addendum for owners names and si�natures
SIGNANRE lY�.TE
********�****,cr�*******�r��**,r*:*:*�****x***�*******�*****x*�*�***���***************
PETITIONER INFORMATION
Continental Development
NAF� (please print) Corporation pi�pNE # 757-7568
ppg�g 12093 Ilex Stree� C
5��� ��� S � , �� �� 1c - ,z 3 - ��
,**„*,***,#*.***,*,*,***„�,**,.***,****.,,�*,*,*��*,**,***„*.*****,**,***********
x��c wr�ffsszoN : Arxzwm
cr� o�naca,: �xzwID
STIH)LATIUNS:
�rt� n��
na��n n��e
1� J
_�
,�
�000Y '�!NF � � 12
E !H
2A
ar . -.r ��r . sa.... __
���1 �L�� � _ - -39 9� /r ci5. /2C-'.°. J!%_ `
� � n
� c. � �
� � , . , ., 3, .� ..
' :ia n, - ,z� �r. �l - �
> ,(V'� �Ca (,�i l'Pi �'�, �}1 �' , l�'� f'�s�
. � � � � � . . �i T � � I�l ��
�' ' .� , . a � N ,� ; �'` C- t
.S� '`% f € x . � ,a ' � -
t, ',n fi, ; - M
, �C, � � . f HI `� s. �CREST .,, �pRIVE �. � ;; � :
Q,'� 6,�, 1�+� ��, (,,�� �q, � �,p,> `�y� � i�� ---- '
v �'g,�' 7 �,H ,E ��� 0 1 /� ` µ, i c i� � - nc' r tl ' ,E,�Q� N
� l Pc�. �A N l ,�� ♦��(�� l. �
: [ ��� ZO(n'1 � {' /il �1� { �Y' O �
\ L� `� L� O + � q /
�.L1 � ry�l� ''l�i� �`�71 �' . � l. �i�% [ � � -`� � �} � tp
/0�., , \,, .Y1: ,'.}i � �� . -. w � �. � d
V�� I� � ��� o . . � �
� �� f na y
��,1 i3 : u �s � ��C . L� � ���y � ���: � ���� • �� " .Si�
�, ; F �R ., ' � �� r�-. 4 Os , -
�o. ,
. , � � � N) �rN) ' _,_ : � > � (�Il � �'
• �
�RF.ST '. � .. " . - _ '.,: ; , ,'
o , -
!�� �^� �� � � „c -,--60
� �� � M�� �r � �,�� _ ,� i '� . , `,
s l � � � ,�
-1, ,�� � :
; , a� vAN;C
_ y
s — �i �' + '� D
- � � � � F,. � i , ,�; '�
' � ` � _ „.�'..�, � ,. _ ;_.. ,� ���� ' �
�l�'LQLAN G RDE S �,; : r ��, ' .;�r.
�s� „ ,��
� . . . _..
AROE ELE ENTA � �, ��so�������� 1,,. '�
1 :A.-. , ,_� • , m.sc oo� ��„ .,. ��� �_
u -,e ,
.,.��w4i _. .. . I.:. � 1 '
`` 1, . �—�—"l— a— _�, � � .,��r +a �a,�„ � ��`i^ r A Q
. ��t� l, a? � .�� i��I :�/4
. •: -i
i- .,O) �PJ ' ar t i.. � I i��.
�� v 'Ss) D_ ilf) /Li) �5c: 235 �25. �. �1 e ��� ^'
r
_OC .-3�: - p (!4) �' . '9;
: r B) � ;
_ e. 1 J, - �+i'1
' .e:: - :�.'..,i . roni � ' i�� -
,�
t I °'Z^I�,,� ,r5i
��r � + ° ^�
. , _� ----•---------: s� '
-,u „ - ---�ir r°l �t`.�.�NV c -" � _
, --_f �i�yo� !���� �1�
-- mF?' -
,,., .
,,. . ,o.
�ACE
H/GH
LOCA'
� 29,,, 31
�,,�" �s: "" -
i .,�+
,c � .
/i���
'3 �
� ,«
�
,_
�
QTY OF PRIII.EY
. r: ��� � :r.• 1� �.�iv �a
ffi�. Novent�er 6, 1986
Dear Utility OomFary:
The City of EYiale� cucrently has a Vacation request, SAV t 86-06 , to
vacate easenents for public utilities described as follaas• the south 5£eet
of ?,o* 22 f3lcrk 3 MoorP Lake Hi Ils and the south 5 fePt an�3 the east 10 __ _
feet o£ Lot 21, Bloc1; 3, fSOOre Lake f:ills qenerallv located south of Hillcrest
Drive and north of Gardena Av�ue.
Please indicate Whether oc not you have a problen wit2� this vacation �e3uest.
Sicy�ed
�e util ity oompany has no prohler. witr, this zeguest.
, � �_
�te
_�_ �e utility oompany d�es have a problen with this te3uest foc the
folla✓ing reasons: �
/II•S. P/7AS AN ExJS�-in/G ov6BNEA0 S�4�LE INAsE L/NE oN
�hll S EA56/�7,E�tlT SE+2d�N6 .3 BV/LD/N6S � dvs AsK TA r TE
�Ef1StMSNTS �E �CErAi�✓EO �Q �A���'v'�'uCG ot TNFSL
FAG/ L!T/E.5 . C Se�E. L�TTA�NED S�TC1/�
N�.�G- . .J���/�6
Sigied Campan}� L�tx
2C
QTY OF PRIII.EY
� r� i� •r• i� • •a
��; Nova�i�er 6, 1986
Dear Utility Cbmpany:
'lt�e City of Fcialey cusrently has a Vacation �equest� SAV 1 86-06 , to
vacate easerrients for public utilities described as follaas• the south 5 feet_
of Lot 22 IIlock 3 Ploore Lake Hills and the south 5 feet and the east 10
feet of Lot 21, Block 3, P'bore Iake i:ills qenerallv located south of Hillcrest
Drive and north of Gardena Avenue.
Please indicate Whether oc cwt you hare a problen with this vacation ce3uest.
� 2he utili
�e utility
follaring reasons:
has no ptoblen witYi this ze3uest.
1 /� b
�J CamPanY Da
d�es have a pcoblen with this request fot the
Sicred Compan}' De te
2D
CITY OF PRIII.EY
VA�7►TIQ�7 R$�UiSS tiC7rl�
ig�. hovenber 6, 1986
Dear Utility Wnpany:
�he City of Frialer• currently has a Vacation zequest, SAV i 86-06 , to
vacate easements for public uti lities described as folla:s• the south 5 feet
of Lot 22. Block 3, Moore Lake Hi�ls and the south 5 feet and the east 1C
feet o£ I.ot 21, Block 3, Pbore Lake I:ills qenerallv located south of Hillcrest
Drive and north of Gardena Avenue.
Please indicate Whether or not you ha✓e a problen with this vacation request.
Si�ed
�e utility oompany has no prohler vith this reguest.
C,anparry�
I� te
��e utility oomg3rry cbes have a problen With this request for the
follaaing reasons: /J
� �.iJ .1.� � 0. .:CJ+.v �.�.,c.c..c �0.� ti''�' ��P � � Q -� ll
J�.e-�e-vr�� o� �,°o-�C z(�-Rav. a-Y. o.�.u��.Q ce-Q�--Q� a.���-e.Q�,� �
N s P �,o.�, �..a..� �-�- �.,-t�.� �-� ��.,�.�.,.�-
� •
�. .,�'�.� n9,�.t�l ��.. �P //-l�-g�
ed Campan}• � �
� CITY OF FRIDLEY REZONING REQUEST ZOA �
� 8451 UN{YERSITY AVE. N.E. 3
FRIDLEY, MN asss2 � VACATION REQUEST SAV f
(612)571-94b0
xxxxx PLATTING REQUEST P.S. � �q-�
R�UisT FEE 5D0 �g1RR FEE RE�IPP �� 2�'r �—
SQiID[7LID PI.ANt1II� OJI�II+II,SSION t+�E�.'PIIJG IlA'I'E 12/1�186
SQiID[7LID CITY Q7[JNCIL MEETIIdG II4TE Ol/05/87
PROPERTY INFORMATION
:: � .�• r : �.�: a.
I,�AL DESQtIFPION: SEE ATTACHED SHEET
I,OT BIACK _
p�� ZQ�� C2 and C3
�2ACf/ADDITIDN
,;:� i� 7�� • �
REASQ� fC)R R$�UFBT: A site glan showing the proposed future use is required for all
of four
parcels of land.
,r�•*+r.*****•.*********,c*******�**.**x*****#..***.�*�********.•...*�****•:*********•*
OWNER INFORMATION
NAME: DAVID HAA
xAME (p ease pr irn
ADDRESS 6279 U ERSITY AVE
ADLRFSS ?931�b RIDGE ROAO
SIGNANRE
NER INFORMA
PNONE �l 612 571_
PHQJE #
FRIDLEY MINNESOTA DAVID HA
�, MIN�
I�1TE 11 N
x DATE �� i
23AN� (please pririt) PROfESSIONAL VENTURESy i�30NE # 612/831-5325
SHIP
pp�g�c 962�.,PALMER ROAD, BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437
� •• i � • �•• o-� �a ��. �•
•� � ••• w �� ��� �•
10 NOVEMBER 1986
Notice is heretr� given
Conmission of the City
Nortl�east on Wednesday.
for the purpose of :
I�BLIC HFARING
BEEDRE gIE
Pi,AN[�7ING QJMMLSSION
that t2�ere will be a Public Hearing of the Planning
of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue
Deo�nber 10, 1986 in the Co�.u�cil Qiaanber at 7:30 p. m
Consideration of a Pceliminary Plat. P.S. #86-07, A& R Second
Aodition, l� John Nelson, being a reglat of Lot 4, Block 1, A& R
Acidition to the City of Fridley, Anoka Coimty, Piiru�esota, ��e
south 300 feet of the north 750 feet of the Northeast Quarter of
the Northwest Quarter except the east 720 feet thereof, all in
Section 12, �30, R-24, A�oka Cotuzty. Minnesota. subject to toad
easements of record, to allow for the development of four
separate �Srcels of land, generally located south of Osborr�e Road
and east of Viron Road.
Any and all persons oesiring to be heard shall be given an opportimity at the
ak�ove stated time and place.
S�,UE BILLINGS
QiATRMAN
A,ANNING WMMISSION
Putil.ish: Novenber 24, 1986
Dece�nber 1, 1986
3A
p�� 11/20/86 �$
Cw�cil
P.S. #86-07
ZOA #86-06 �I� ��
John Llelson
Professional Ventures Partnership
9624 Palmer Road
Bloaningt�, MN 55437
David Harris
6279 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Jack D7axwe1l
2931 Partridge Road
Faseville, MN 55113
Lar�ert Ltmber Co.
36 S Snelling Avenue
St. Paul, NID1 55105
Park Metropolitan Funding
7570 Hic�way 65 N.E.
Fridley, NIN 55432
Brand Braac3aay Associates
16255 Ventura Boulevard
Ehcino, CA 91436
Amxo Oil Ccmpany
494� Viking Drive
Minneapolis, NID1 55435
Fridley State Bank
6315 University Aven� N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
City of Spring Lake Park
1301 - Slst Avenue N.E.
Spring I.ake Park, NII3 55432
Strite Andersan Co.
7585 Viron RDad
Fridley, MN 55432
Anderson Trucking
203 Cooper Avenue North
St. Cloud, NA7 56301
,s�
_
2�
1
� 3C
�s'� ��f;,� - r �TTY�;LTfN1TS 1 �4' _ � _ �200_ _ � � � _ E e.�,-,;,= ,��::.
sh..�,«,,. o
`'�'�'`w'�°� OF F R 10 L E Y �. e "':.,. ',°
� �� �s) , .,,� _ r_ _,
/20 ""
� ) �60) �/G�- �
r � ^ 3 2 N ��„� e
N
' A DER ON �
.,o u
: ; �<;,,��';3;;r
...w ,� �: so�
Sa 1
( r'
' �}�'• Mi//iq 60ri.�reYfs - oa oc
c
� '' �tazA .. � yeo
_ i5 (00 __ _ � . '
�: 1 ____� • . . ��8'� j • \
J•
I ; Gt�r) �°� � e 4 �
�
� • �•'v r •. 'S�: . �Z 4 D� � � - � ; �i 3 j � i
� titiLfi. fS • 51.� z o 0
�!/ � h� • ''' �kr'�'r . r,. '.. w
I: . _ _ h1•r1_._ _ _ : . • }r:.��.�' �_ .�Y• . _ . � �'i 1 I
1 `•'V�
Ow Ria/f1' G°7°. �G�f
�✓ l.4.
-- -7-
�¢��)
Gera/d F f
To6e/:rsn
l��i
,�
/S
(s.isiJ
..«o.rr,
!
DEVELOPMENT
. �6
. o
:9�Y..... ._ _
�7)
/L7�0,'
i/iro'1 i�1lG�/Y, //K
l.�d�'d/
/
MihLn 6 0u�m�Ii}i � �/pGvod
�'� os te. a .%.00�f �J
r"'�°� � LOCA�`�ON MA
z�r.k
{S0�
•r �
n
�2
�
� w
i
� ,
� ,
'�
�
i°
��:
;� � :
�•--+--: -. � i i � wa
��_ -�����
�� �i
��i
�
Mt
��., E' ti. �
�� � �? 4u ,�.w
f ��� �; �;{
I � . � `. � i'}{r
i- i �� '�—� -T-^'
�Ra�R+c� _a.� .�
L�
,�
n
�o
0
Z
% 3 /'
/ �
V 't� :�
. ...
..
�.
. ....
.
. ..
. ..
..
. .
:
. .•. .•:
.. .i
W
r�
c
J
. . ,
.•: �
.
r • • �
W
�
Z
W
�
<
11
�
,••.•.�...�i.,•._�•�. ,-,1�.-.-
;� �a0a�� �!
;:::�@��i��0 � : oa
... �liNJ:.i�I•1;��]'
�:: om0000�ivo �'°'.10
C o����!�:�o ►;
�a�m�m���*' ov _
t�r;�'::.��ii4i�:;�Lt[eLi�L';2[�•
, . - � • �,
' ��i��� .
��l� � � .
��a:ity . s�i: ��
�...�..
,...... �
,::�: : � o
�.. � . da -
,...... .
�......
i.iya.k++,�•r .�.iaa
..."'�5�:;�
� �,. �,
IYU�YI�
���NO � .
�������
i:E6::eee �;� � �
�
� ����� � ��
��� Z.ND f-t� 17 f TI O�
i�uE�rn+�n)pRY P�r I
,i I � I
� { �
��
; � i �,
>
� .' ..,r., �—�`� I \
T----- � —
� � 1.r�..a7 _�� .. .�.�_ . .
_.
4. ,o a �a�� -,...,:�:.,. � .
s -- , � --- � - -
` � I � \ „ ../c' - - - - - �- - � � �
Z � Fi,
o � I % � , _ .. ' '>� . . . _. _ _ ;\" � l 7 �? �
il ' I I /'
� �
� I{ °S \ 49-�� �� � '`�
. — G:, Ir �
I\ � �" ,I � '�� `a \ /� � . , . ��.
;� i � ip1 - l � /� �
. ' `• �.I_ �o � I c0
� � I 1
r- ,�� � n �� �� ' ' . .. _. _
? `1�� --- — - - _�F,— - - - — I � ` � f
I'
, ,� M
, �
`� ,i� - - _ -- -- --1 ;
� � �
, i I �� 1
� :
� � - � _- � -- -}--1--
� j I V ` _c di. `. �— '
� ' i � p i
' � � i �v� `L
� I I
� j � � .
�Q' .`_—_ — __— .r.
� �� �- �� / _.
:� � � �
;i' '� '.+_ ------ --
1 •
m J � � �
� �: ' �° � ;
� � . � I
� l�
� �v
-' .i\ Ii:O ,
2 / l, .
'� � I
� _:,_
� '' i - -; �_
' - � ° --- _
s i''i�
.6 i � i �
�` I lf C,
._
+ 5
`
.._ . . _ . i,� :--
- � .._ � .. . -
� � - Z°9� 9B
i�i
,.
I
�?
i ; �
. . 1 � 0n
3 �' � 4!
� ; �
llt°p '_-__-'8^rr�___�y�� �.�;
� ��
i i ,
- �
_ � ' •�
iI
,
���-� ��
:e-.:; --! : ,,:. � ;, -� �
- ,-.� . - �r � �,
�� �U
:�
�
S'.': 1 � L AvUC��CSGr� �..oMi���.�,.�. - " � � - < .... , ..
3E
�
�c
G
:�,
i
I
�
. � ? �
'< <� �
° 3F
�. u
i��`�rr`�r�� i r�ip nriir: �: :' :�.� i��:
C . �� .� � � s: �1 i �' � P t+ � r � �
C � '� Cy
. — ��* � akrlh lir� o('/h� NW�/i o(�S'tdion 1?, L3o,illa.
, i.,
�• o x� � lt�orJhlnrl CM'ntr o� ll�i %.'�U
f�
w_.. J L�_'_.�_� ��� ��_._ �.�_"_ �_._"_ �_-___ �"_. _. _. _� .._ . '_ _ " .
' .. _. y. •�. Y. /i/. .S�.S�.���E r
` , � : " . � " :, '� � ' ' 37QO6 ^ ', � �' � ,
_ . _ _ _ _ . _ l �. K / : � ♦ � �_
• o - •-- --- , , OS60�NE . QOAP
' � ' � C. S. 4. N. � ND. B
' � - - — � --- - --
; i =� ' I !o �_i� ° _�.eoo.__�_ . � .__,_ . isio5 �
_ ._.._ _ .
`, ` ! � i „ti -P � ,
. i �i r < 4�.00� �,,.i ..,��_...,. .
� ,: ; a , � � ; v .w.. �.:,
:� c , y
O � j , a
ti � �
:'�y �, � . � 1 ; q' Q ]
. � ?C Q n ,� .. n
` V /�� �
� � . �? ;; "M �
J ti �ne.� v 0 0 � O �
� y. �. �� `: t - . _ /� . - . _ _ . �,ej � 'j g. . Iz n �
:, n l. � 1. V � � � ; rv:
. i .. '. r 2 ii ' !
�, Y r ' J ' � Q s�.° p � a
-� _
'j� �_ — C. � i� � 2 J ^. � d � ao1 � � r �
� , nyo4
: o.e. �.�a >..a .n,�,� , ` 1 r
�_� s,,•� r5 rc � ; .oaeu..,a..� I �� � O! V O
� . �p ;�If.�4• i0 e� ( n
. �.
/
.. l •' /7 /� , _1_.c � .��� � �
ti � ° Y��K�.1)Y KOQ1." " '61�0�1 e~-eev^.�[ C�. �� ,
_ _ __ SL_�'-_J'_' �L __�_S. `.'A�• _ .
-., . Vy. � ! �° lS � U`�
_ „ � � P�T• se� _� �; ,
� ,~ o --_ _ ' l - - -, , V ; �
, , �
:.� � r �`_ ,.n� i, � ���� d
� �, �� M J ` ' � � , ' � I �
:� ?. :,, ` � - � . , i '" \ � 3 , �. .3 i i
�� � ,_ o < g
� ``c`' � -,; � ', � 1�y n � ' o r
. � p� 7� I ��° �n O � a
� 'o O ___ J� _ .. . f � . .. _ _.. - z ; �
. � , ;,.r
\! ... � N 'I �
U
� � - � - � rp ' / .
_ �+r I� t �1.�-- {�� ����{�-�- I__ {t�' � • 2�0.� i
� � ' '-V � � ' � �� d, +� � � � f � , '
1 I_ i .f , � c.: � ; . f• I ,
1 j r� � � �' � b I 1
� i I F l�' /! , Q �' 1
� i
` �
! I
�• � ' • �_
� � ; f� �D D � � i C� _ n�` y,� '°' ,_ _ ; �= � '
�t j ` .�z- �- =,or" - =�1
_ u
r -
� � � _ . , _ ..._�.A_ '4�{�I ,
` �. I . .. _.. ._ . ' _. °��.. . . _ � it �!i'I � i
� � ' f.' �� l, I Y� 1 � �fZ`� 3 , � , _ �
� � � � � ' h J �e ��° �
:,; � a - _ �^i
�
'{ v . � <
3 ,I . «
'� ; ; � ; i
' I
._ ' ' . . �1}00 � ----- 89e —�—��yi;. : � �r _ .
i li '�
i . , " i � ,
- _ i �
1 � � 'I
�. � _ _ ... • ''� � � �I � -- - - _ �
. �' "� -- .. - - - - . L _ LL _ i�-- - - ---
— . ---- _ - ;F r�'� :r s:..., _ � i „ . - . '"� i
�
_ �� -- - \ \�
' ^ - � biz.c -- �'
'� -
%
I , i
— _.. . — s�..�� ,,.;� ,l !lp n.}.i;� � �,l <. :,.. �
3G
aseoRn� �
_—�� � u�..rmw �.
;�-� ,. \ /,,`�: ' _ —'-`— _ _ .-----
„ . � ,'`__�'.� � ; � . � P,'��.�`�
� ��il �J, , � ''��
_ � _—_ dj_--�
� L � � � " �
�I -- � �,---� � � �'
I. y' n
I I � �
� ;� � � �
i ���r '��� � ��
� � }�J., i
� -� = yiw:n rzow � .�� ,,. ° �
� � � � s� �' �—f : ;' ,� -1 '-�1
i �< % � " � �—^" "�— c�, -
i
� � N� c- ..— .
� , �� i/ !'--.-_ -- �� ..
i
� �,
�
'' �, i ��c ��11. .' � ' I
. . � ' � l � i lr � �� . �'
r .
; _.__�
. -- i . .�� ..
� ,. � h. �, ' . _ I
, ��cr}' . . _ . _ ,
" _ '
-�h:
a
fj � �
I
i
�
�_ --- - - _
j
� I
E<G�:fi:: 7d_`�C: r� ; ini �
i � �',Lj r� (
: ` ( �� � ;
7 � � � � _—. _ _ . . _ _ �i _ _ C — SuR.vF� G�P.
i. "_ �
il � �L, � _ _ _
� p�y
1.�.� rrr i I � W PV,� �NT
3 �wR�Ks� I � �
Itl , �
{ � — e
� " � — - — b�� R.O.W ccK.F�fUF,E 2GG .
I ' _ __—_ ._'____
� ' � _ �
' I �
� 1 �I � � _ — — — — '
� �1 � I
I �` � c
� ��
, �
�,
� { � -;��:_
i M � - _ _
; I � -��`l�
1
, ,
� �
' � I�
� � , �
, � ,
I �
I �
.� = _ � � _ =� _��_V.______—"_"_ _�'�
BDUIEYr.}fZD LIL>NTING qnv L,4NDSGA��Iyv
su[.E i', so -o
.-v;, �
�
�
;
O, ^
`v^'
V`
w �
�
µw Y G� �
�- ��
' I I � � I���
' ; �
(� ; � , �
; (� ;, ,
� ' UIi �! '0
l
i '�-�, J
>>; , � ,J
� � - - �--
� � , : �..� ,� �,
jl I I
� i i �_ _ �I
-� I
I '
I , ! �
I �
�--,. r---;
` 1
C._ _ -_.-_
�
� '
� - �
�
�
�__� 4�'
__ T ' �.
_ .__ _ - J- � "_
/ ' '
� �
�� �
i �
� � ' �
� � i � z
I I �
,
I � ; �
i i ,
� � i
1 1 � - ---;
1 I ��
�- - --t
I � � '
�l � , , i
, , �
�� i 1
� --,�- k -- -- - -'
3H
� CITY OF FRIDLEr
� �i43 i llNIVERSITY AVE. N.E.
FHIDLEY. MN 6b4�Z
(s�s1s��-ssao
�t REZONING FiEQUEST ZOA ,��-O�o c
VACATiON REQUEST SAV �
PLATTING REOUEST P.S. #
�� � �o � �E �� � a��s z
-. a. a � •• i� u i� r � i �• t:.
9QiIDULID CITY 47UNCII, MEETING �fTE
PROPERTY INFORMATION
..�.,,- ��•�.
0
SEE ATTACHED SHEET
�1 :• M' Y• � M •� � U
•• 7� 7 • 1 . 1� `:� >. 71� •. 1
� 1.
REASCN Ft7R R$�UFS'!': A site plan showing the ptoposed future use is required for all
raoning.
Sub,ject parcel is presentiv under two zonina classifications Petitioner reauests that
the area now zoned "C-3" be down-zoned to a"C-2" classification
,r,c**+**•�*.**,r:*,r:****.*�*�****��****�*r****t*r�r****r,r•.****,r*******,.**,r.***•***«:,r*
OWNER INFORMATION
NAME: DAVID HARRIS
NAME (Dlease �intl.lACK MAYWFI I
.��•y,,
SIGt�RqIIRE
ER INFORMATION
PHONE # 612l571-7792
nq� 11 NOVEMBER 19 6
*��,��****�*�`�vP�4�:,�� *:*•***.
IZiU�E (Please prirn)?ROFESSIONAL VENTURES,, �q�g #_ 612L831-5325
ARTNERSHIP�
ADII�SS _ 9bZ4 PALMER ROAD. BLOOMiNr,mN_ MrNNFCnra ��dz�
•lf� � � �� i � • ••,• »
M �( � •' � ?�
�a ��� �•
�.} 171� � •
10 NOVEMBER 1986
***�*:****,r*��**
STIFULATIDNS:
�
HIBLIC HEARIIT
BEFURE 1HE
PI,ANNING QJtq+QSSION
Notice is heretr� given that there wi11 be a Public Bearing of the Planning
Commission of �e City of FYidley in the City Hall at 6431 Univecsity Av enue
Northeast on Wec�esday, Deoember 10. 1986 in the Co�cil Q�amtec at 7:30 p.m
for the purpose of:
Considecation of a Rezoning Request, ZOA #86-06, by 3ohn Nelson,
to rezone from C-3, Genetal Shopping Center, to C-�, General
Business, on the south 300 feet of the north 750 feet of the
Northeast ouartez of the Northwest Quarter except the east 720
feet thereof, all in Section 12, �-30, R-29, Anoka County,
Minnesota, s�bject to road easanents of reoord, generally located
south of Osborne Road and east of Viron Road.
Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an o�.portunity at the
above stateci time and glace.
STE�7E BILI,INGS
QIAIR�N
H,ANNING WMMISSION
Puhlish: Nwenber 24, 1986
Dec�nber 1. 1986
4A
Planning 11/20/86 4B
Council
P.S. #86-07
7AA #86-06 �,�7G LIST
John tlelson
Professional Ventures Partnership
9624 Palmer Raad
Bloomington, MN 55437
David Harris
6279 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Jack Dlaxwell
2931 Partridge Road
Fipseville, MN 55113
I,anq�ert Ltmi�er Co.
36 S Snelling Avenue
St. Paul, NIN 55105
Park Metropolitan Funding
7570 Hiqhway 65 N,E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Brand Broacl�aay Associates
15255 Ventura Boulevard
Ehcino, CA 91436
1�.moc.ro Oil Cong�any
4940 Viking Drive
Minneapolis, MN 55435
Fridley State &3nk
6315 Univer5ity Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
City of Spring Lake Park
1301 - Slst Avenue N.E.
Spring Lake Park, MN 55432
Strite Anderson Co.
7585 Vimn Road
Fridley, NIN 55432
Anderson Trucking
203 Cooper Avenue North
St. Cloud, MN 56301
/t�
- 2�
i G
��
SEG
; i, . . , ; � :o..�
��s�-� �TTY�{LTfi�1TS `'� — ±--200_�__�_ixo.i0____ �+^Y
.� SbeimweifQr _- e,ee'es:i .
75 <i�e/L Natron OF F R 10 � E Y w p �• r:^.� - >o
� �) �+J „� _ >. .
I _ . o �/20) .. o (60) /�G,: ,s r�
l � �
� 3 p N �,a� o
N
� "° ' �2� � A DER ON �
So 1
IMi/�aq 60iimiNl ' oo c -> .-
� __aia2o. - eoa
' !00 – �
I: --- . ✓go) ' ;
� l.ow) (3� � 4 � `
� � �Z4D� . .J �I3i i
r}:v..:.: . r. rfr}rr.•:rr: .r r.,: I
'i-y'+A:r7�:;1. f r�.1•�:{'•: .4;{' �{{�4,�:y:. : r i n /,,
I� U�':�}f}{��� ?L��y'�.t.'• xv�.L"v{1>'"" ' �.' r 5/r% 1 2 e o I
�
��
04- a.,�iry t�. (c J
ws.�.
�� I.
z �
}
Q _ JN �
__ �
T � /4yc�
f+^ � Ge�e/t1E �f�
v � To6ei�sn
_ —__
� � O
� h
�N
1.L I
0
L Y .'�l
r
W
Q
�
cn *�l
� ,�..
DEVELOPMFNT
. �6
yo
�.� , -
i1j
— �
(sJfvJ
., «o -(��
• iif_1�w.�_
h�
(z �a,�
✓iros Rea//y, ine.
��i'e/
(4p/
o)
.Ni/ArnGO�imtfli /NOGood
�
�
I `
• Ifel
1
h
�
.:�
�
� � �I y
�`, °
I � .
4 °I
i ` .
I
L
—I I
�..
�
I
r� v�t�, a b,�.� <<� � � .�
�'�°� �OCATit�N MAP 4' �
�.
_^�--+-'� 1 1 i 1
�?-��
,
�►
�,
�
a
�
Mf
r 1 �r T� rrr--
�� w'�r'11If � -�
L='
�
�o
d
z
`:�,. E ° ti. - q , �.
�.:I� ; i
� � �'= / i �
. �
r- ;'Ta
�r�� � � �
r. �.. ,. .
£'' . £ E'y'trw_. � � • I ; I �
. . . •
..
.. .
. ....
.
. ..
. .:
..
. .
:
.
. ...
.. .
Q� •
:
�. . .�.
. . ,
. •„
.�
e♦•�
W
�
z
W
�
a
� -C"_ _
�•,..•a •� r1..•._rr..-er.�r
•...
i� �����
,�����ooa� .!
�....
�.. . �•i•i;,�• .
�.= omoa00000 �
C o�����.-�o ►:
0� 9� +��it��,�, -
��oo
��t Y,�r��;,��'������
�r�c�...a�lir...
�
� . * � �.
' ;��M� �
� �, • � .
��
���1 �
�.�:,:�:7..a•�: �
..,. � �
......��0 � 60
;:::: �
,.. � . .
,...... -
,......
�yyyty�►ef if.lii
�n.••.� � ' ' �.�
i� ��w.��
—1 � !1/ ii )
r /
r� ��,
• • • • • • • ,
.+ • • ,
•. • • • • • � �_
�1• r r
�.`.�� {�. • . ��i
5 . ,+r r• .._ �...
7r y
� �,� "34� ��'d'�y7�� � 1
�I .IL�} Y ..Y
3� � ,.
� � � - r�•
�� �
, �
� : = .;
' _ ,� ;_ 'e
�
' I ' ? ' i. _f ' '.
�) � �• . '.�� � r�.�
i� �� �,'�" � }�� �3f
lA
� � t �.:. 1`� tw� \i?etS�eC' N!
���- -'
_„ `
.� ,
.-'••'�i _._. _ - -- ���
� ' a - ,
^ �`��;l�il��,. � .,� :r� �� .�_l �E
�c�.� 4 � �
� �� ��
'-� �, , � n � H .�3�"�, �ce : � �1 � . : . -�
���- ie � 'f..
- �,�� i _ � ���� .
. s ,' � . i
aii ;� ` n
� � ��- ..�.
_,� _
� . �' '.k
, , �.� � 4'i� � • � .�
• � �� �
���• ` - .. :.I� t! . '
� -:":iki.av �S. � , � T. ��
�`'` — :�` , �� �.- --
;� .-, Q ��:
,.
�� � z r (/f /,
_,.,� ���� , , , � �oi
� ' �" DER
) i .`r�` ,�? +��,'� -.; ¢ `rx ;� J�
i i 9 � , t�ssa� �, I'�
• „ . . ",M•N.+�6A�vew/i �'. � � - "� �
y 1 "
� �xlSl f���.. t .�t. � 4. 4;'+..,: ' i-..
.. � ' .. _— �_.�.��i._ . i y� A`�.. 1 . � �. � ,
, G Z y ' v:
� ,� - ` .:, � �
s ' '_ {y' i � Y�J }�� �+3+. � ��, y�y F °9i f ;.a.'T"-uJ ` a
K is '� •i&, . " � �j{ - � -"^' -
I �:,' „�:iiF .j;. .1 .b�.` M'�'�f � �,iC� 3�� , �I
r
;� � , q ' L^�f r � _ � �'. i
a � : � : >.�ed a��. � . ��,• �I � il 1 1� :. : � ' 1 ;
� �� : ��''� ��-' .
, �' �� �.��:��� EVELOPMENT
. � . ... �
f
�
,�rs.f•�+�5r.. . , —•
. r ' - F�,K- :;!:;is � �.. •��
� ` . � '� � _ . . � ro. e . >v
- ... *�"'_' ,. ... .
� f � -
W. /y� -----, _ . �� .'a.,� . . , .
(Fildj � �
� �! 9�f15 Rf�g �i�` , � � , �, b) ;4�n �, .s
w r,�.. , •� , - /a �.%� ° .
�� !)Nli li 17 . -. - i� Nnw�,Y,/�r.
� �i1��iMi �� � � �t:-" .
��l f H� �tit�i�� r�.
� �! �,°� �
�.. � ; � � . ;'��'<:ti,i.
: r .. � � , �i ,.+�•
'w'' � '�j' :' ,... _
,t�•�B�-�a ►l�'ttlj'itlii . �. �s�
: � n fit1f1/AT111,1}��� niR�+11�) _ �^� `�' � ° . .
� ; l►'�'i '�+� � ;-.::� � s.�' l?�i'e/ -
� T
�?1 �' i t.� . � . .
_ .�T 1..f ''4��'
�. F_ 5,�� r,�.'�..t,.�t_.__"�`
?�; .� . .: � ' .t- �,,„ -�: � /,'." � � -�
.�,, ' r . , rr �+�`� f ,`.�. � ~ 41� ?
� ia'. • ii1 � '. k r' �yimNli rN�6ocd
s ° ; � : � .
�' c '.i . �, i�l j�iA �* . �'" i : �'' ^� �� ' �' i �T.7R+. .
NIJ A �
��� �� ":. '� ,. -
,�# �;. � t��� .
e i t� :� i
�7�ra.
sw-
0
�
drr aF �in��r 5
atS1 UNIYEP�1T1/ AbE. N.E.
FRIDLEY, c:H casss LOT SP�IT �ORM �L.S. #
I012)571-5480 . - � �
LdP SPI.IT fEE �,o•oo PP�RK FEE RE(EIPP 1 303
$�yFIXJj,ID pj,ANN1NG Q�I+p�II$$j(k�l P¢.�,'TING L1ATE: December 10. 1986
8Q�]FIX7Lf9 CITy QXTNCII, ►�E'PIj�X', ]lATE: December 22. 1986
PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADQ2F$S: 8150 U'vers t venue ridle Minnesota
LK3AL
LOT 1 BLO(7C 1 and 2'iRACr/ADDITD�N Vantaae Companies Addition
H2ESFNT ZCNII�i
REASON L�R IAZ' SPLIT: *A sketch aE the propezty anci the p[oposed lot split with ar�
existing structures shown should acoanpany this appiication.
For sale of qropeYty and existina improvements and to provide proper easements
for future development on parcels to north now owned by Vantage Properties, inc,
t • ►r # t * * k ir ! • ft * • ft • * .t ! * t s * ! + t # • • t # * t !r R s +t R t * +F ft
OWNER INFORMATION
Npp� Vantaye Properties, inc, pF]CNE # 944-1000
ADIRFSS 11095 Vikina Dtive Suite 260 Eden Praizie Minnesota 55344
SI(',Iy,,1Ugg i/IJLCLllLf.(/O /�/X�—� IIyyTE December 4, 1986
* t R*#� *• i; R t t* R! R R t R t! t# 4 4# 4 R!! i� 1 A!� *** i� i� R f R
PETITIONER INFORMATION
Ni1hE Vantaqe Properties, inc. pf]� # 944-1000
Ap�.S 11095 Vikina Drive Suite 260 Eden Prairie Minnesota 55344 _
SIGI�RURE
December 4, 1986
: * t • � • : * * t * t t t : : * f * s • * • * • +r : * : x • : ,r • t x * • • + * *
� I 1 U I 1 fY •• � }� �.? 1]I� 1�
�M Y ��. �MI
SPIH7LATIDNS:
.. � a� � a �xr � •
;t30TE: DraWinq or sketch�pf prepared lot split and easements will be delivered to
City by end of workinq day,Friday, December 5, 1966, as discussed with
Jock Rpbertson.
L.S. #86-09
VANTAGE COMPANIES
NORMAN G. HOLM
700 INDUSTRY AVENUE N.W.
ANOKA, MN 55303
RALPH VIRGIlLO
7A66 DIEADOWOOD DRIVE
BROOKLYN PARK, MN 55444
JOHN G. PURMORT
13130 ISLAND VIEW DRIUE
ELK RIVER, MN 55330
SRYANT INVESTME4STS
3140 CHOWEN AVENUE SOUTH
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416
JULIAN JOHNSON
9009 WASHINGTON P7.E.
BLAINE, MN 55434
GERAL6 PASCNKE
7970 UNIVERSITY AVENUE
FRIDLEY, NN 55432
RONALD J. FLANAGAN
1700 W HWY 36 SUITE 621E
ST PUAL, MN 55113
?RUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY
37�1 WAYZATA BOUIEVEARD BOX 709
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440
JIUIES I TAYLOR
1487 - 97TH AVENUE N.W.
COON RAPIDS, MN 55433
BRYANT FRANKtIN
12784 Q STREET
OMAHA, NE 68137
DEMATTS INCORPORATED
10301 UNIVERSITY AUENUE N.E.
BLAINE, MN 554?4
BRYANT FRANKLIN
8Q0 WEST COUNTY ROAD �
NEW BRIGHTON, MN 55112
Planning Commissi
City Council
MAILING LIST
WILLIAM BARBUSH
3140 CHOWEN AVENUE SOUTN
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416
MIDWEST FEDERAL
801 NICOLLET NALL
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
BRYANT fRANKLIN CORP.
P.O. BOX 599
SAN ANTONIO, TX 78292
FRIDLEY GOLF DRIVING RANGE
BOX 32101
FRIDLEY, MN 55432
PARK CONSTRUCTION
7900 BEECH STREET
FRIDLEY, MN 55432
1/ANTAGE PROPER7IE5, INC.
2626 EAST 82ND STREET
SUI7E 101
BLOOMINGiON, MN 5542D
ROGER JONES
59�5 WESTBRO�K ROAD
GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422
JULIAN JOHNSON
1011 - 41ST AVENUE N.E.
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55421
RODNEY T. THEIN
FIRST BANK MINNEAPOLIS
FIRST BANK PLACE
P.O. BOX A-55
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55480
5l�
�
unroF
FRIDLEY
�OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPART'MENT
MEMORANDUM
!E!D Zo: rlasim Qureshi. city Managet
� �a
l�END F%7M: Jxk Rof�ettson, �aenunity Developnent Dicector �
Oacsel Qark, Q�iei $uildi� Official
MEM1 IIA1E: Deoenber 4r 19Bfi
REC�,ARDlt�: Pcoposed Vantage Develogoent Lot Sp1it
On Deoanber 1, 19B6r with �vid Newman. we met with L�vid Mitchell and Matt
Nichol, Vantage cbmpanies representatives, to discuss the division of the
Vantage property located on 83rd Avenue and University Avenue.
Darrel Clark explaired the followinq sections of the Buildina Code. �e
maximun allowahle ir►divided area af a Zj�pe IIII�1 sprinklered building in a B-2
occupancy group, with open aza3 on four sides, is tailiunited: if open on only
three sides, it restricts the maximiun area to 72,000 square feet. If the
building weze uP9caded to 7ype III one hour- the maximwn size allowed with
open azea on three sides incra3ses to 108.000 sguare feet.
�e approximate area of the existing Wholesale Qub is 109,000 square feet.
�erefore the open sFace/ownership line must be at least 60 feet away from
the existina building unless the construction is upgraded to at least one
hour. Yhis open sg3cp can be interrupted with the construction of an
enclosed pedestrian walkway, which meets the requiranents of Unifonn Building
Coae Section 509. It restricts the size to a maximiaa vidth of 30 feet and
its use to walkway purposes only. If the walkwav is a�ina to have openinas
on either end, they must be properly fire cated and the wall of the new
building would have to be at least five feeet from the property division
lu�e. �ezefore the minimua lerx,�th of the walkway w�ould be 65 feet
Bob Aldtich has concluded that the Fize Code will zequiie a paved Fize
DeFaztmert access toad arou�d the entire perimetes of the Wholesale QUb and
any building mnrected to it; the cleac access width to be maintained must be
at least 20 feet with appzopriate radii at its ct�ange in ditection.
Jock Robectson e�lai.ned that the Developa�t Agreaaent between the City and
Vantage envisions a high quality contiquous shoppina centec development.
Q�anges in size and location of subsequent �fiases mav be c�7uired, but these
cYianges must be reviewed b� the Planning Camnission and the City Council to
ensure the same or better level of developnent gualitv. �►erefore if the
Planning Commission and City Cbuncil wish to apprwe the lot split, we
suggest that the fallawinq stipulations be attached to the orderr recorded
against the parcels along wit2� the existing Development Agreement and
enforced b� City staff:
1. 'R�e lot line be located 60 feet nocth of the existing Wholesale Club
building.
�
5C
r3asim oureshi
Decae�nber 4, 1986
Pa9e 2
2. ge subsequent huilding to the nort2� be located five feeC nocth of the
above �w pzoperty liu�e.
3. me intervenina 65 foot seg3ration consist of a covered pedestrian
Walkway and heavily landscaped open pedestrian alaza.
4. A pave�i aaoess road of 20 foot minimun width with avpropriate radii be
provided aroind the entire perimeter of the building eamplex.
5. All subsequent buildings and pedestrian walkways be contiguous so as to
be Facts of an integrated shopping cemes.
6. 'the facades and caiwpies of subsequer�t buildinqs and walkways be of equal
ot bettez vistBl quality and materials.
7. Tandscaping aro�d subsequent buildinqs and �rking ara3s be of equal or
better visUal q�ality and materials.
8. Fliture developnent submittals which do not meet the above cefecenced
stipulations, as determi.ned tiy staff, shall be subject to plannina
Concnission a� City Oo�ncil appzwal-
�
1+}-86-313
cc: FAbert Aldrich
_�
� ±`•
s ---
� `'>. � ` i
eo -.
r
� Oi
Q..
„�, �,:i o ,� ,,, »,
.. o �,;,:.:
_—_— 4��� �vP�, ��...� # �
� E
� s a... l o`F >> i,�i� +,
�pa _.. o:; c ��
Y J V 1
'-i �� o o .• .n ^ � • ��
° � .> ��� anta .,\.. -
.. .�
- _ ► , �i ,
-- 3tr'iS----,-%.,�-ft---fb---�}N-'.-'�;:
��-_ _,,.�..�.�.
- - --�• —...---- -- --
,—M�Alt� � �D� . SllNll _ _ 31VHDdtlOD
,T�-�._ �.i"1` Q ��� - ... r` . :t. 3h1!!0
i I F a; 1� ~�u ✓��•�.
� 1, �� �� � � : �� � . °. .i ,�a
�
� = ;1 � I y � , .:�,� � .'`; 1
� � �
S,� j' . r` :te; � i ,� '' .., ={-
� �7� � u+ .� �. � , . , a
. 1� � � a � �.�� i �� Q ���� r. � /'�� ��j N
�� � ��.`,�� I •. Q 0.�. d = « 4 0
y �}
; � ,
� . i d� O� I - I-- ' n
, � �� 4 � � � - -- 'L ' ' � � � , .... � �
' // - � 'y• ~4 ` � `^ : � � .1
I . � 3 � � `� - - ^ J
i
% ; - _ � _ • _ , e� - -.� -- ;,: ��. , �- ,�
il ` � -, - . 1 .�� u
� , m � � . � C1
, a
� ,� � J
-
---- • .� : _-. .,�.
- �� � � 1 — --- ---- - --
� i . .� -� � ..
I` + � �� I I ��'��.
,I � ` �`
� � , � <_ �, I� ,r, � �
` � I` � ' ,_...0 � I `~
�i_ - � � � � �I
;L--
�i
I ,I� � 'S —_ _._ �i
1;3, I �j �Il
I I t' ! �-- - ----
� �' -�-- ---
� � � -------
I , �I
i� y �
I I 1, i' j:i
j � l i ��`�
I ' !
� � ��'.
� � � , i.� , -i
� ,i�, �� ,� _._ ,. li! � ;
-�r----�____ =-_ ----- ---- _ _ �:� .
r
�-
—T
_ . U� I
_ 5E
,W �
,
=il'.F.�_�..�i� ...,.b::y:.:%:i�v?i '
� ... . .. ..:.. .... . . . ... .. ...... ° ....�.':<.�.`.�,
99'LSV-3.,rt,6Z.OS
__ __ �oe�c cs r —
N __'Q`,�F ____"-`� ____. fi• I
e °r.
aop . �B�i�i,pi � , • �
n�o � pw`� y\�` - D ' �' I '
L
a C � .. � CQ _ I
� "� :r c_ (v � �
'� �s °�;r � �-' .. 0 8 ;' � cc ,.
i • ir �� �:1 -. C•� ar: a q eh� �- \
o� � _ � , �
,;
', . Cd 9 -. _ - 'OGLOI� :- � � � � _
\ f�2.�eGi-. - _
d ' '' -
I _ - n J��"�OGO.S1eq - OD'06i�idL.00.0a . r. . ....., . . �.
a�� u�S
: �> er 1S3M � �
o ^ p� S OZ; �.
I a C..s C:b ._—_—OOLOI___�.` I .-
4 3` \ I
Ct�9
pa.'�1 I -., _
'3 r: •o � [[
9z a I
,_ ` � - _
<
pe
.. ; ., : �..�
. � .. . . .. ... . .. \..
Z _
w \ _.
m Q N . a `I
['1 P.
,. _ - � n
N �y
_ L —
� W � ��f�: � .�_ . .
�, � — a 3 i � _
r, ° _ ;
- /- D (�1 i`� �
- r � O P (-, � . . [ (1 � .
P � �.�n Z A ' .
. _ c0 • � i .... ^ �
. . � N ` � , � - .
m( i
. ► � ' ,: ` ,, L -
. � �,- : _ :
_ ; - _
_ _ ,,,. , - -
� ; � �: � -
� N .f7 , ii ..
� � �EE '�
m
�. r
L:: �
:
� �
. i Ci . .
0� " '' �
' / ... .___. -VVn[f-_'_'.� �� `.
-_ -__ __ �J �' _ _
-o � 133aiS Nlbw � -- -
L �•5 :t�rwN •�+ �� ; J�"" 90'tSV-M„ZS,20.�N � F "r.'l�
.iIMS �v�e�o ��.� lu� �V.� �- iL�..` Vi ..
�
B:.ACKt�SARKED changes to prior version of
this dor.ument, which was adopted on Septer�ber 22, 1986
MODIFIED RED£VELOPMENT PLAN
FOR
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1
(CENTER CITY REDEVELQPMENT AREA)
AND
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS
FOR
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1
THROUGH
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 8
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN ANA FOR TIiE
CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
December 22, 1986
'L - - -
This document was drafted by: O'CONNOR & HANNAN
3800 IDS Tower
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
612/341-3800
,�
MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN
Based upon the statutory authority described in the
Modifiec7 Redevelopment Plan attached hereto, the public
purpose findings by the Commissioners and for the purpose of
fulfillin� the Authozity's redevelopment objectives as set
forth in the Modified Redevelopment Plan, the Commissioners
have created, established and designated Redevelopment Proj-
ect No. 1 pursuant to and in accordance with the [equire-
ments of Sections 462.411 thcough 462.716, inclusive, as
amended (the "Housing and Redevelopment Act").
The following municipal action was taken in connection
therewith:
May 15, 19�9: The Redevelopment Plan for Center City
was adopted by the City Council.
A ril 6, 1981: The Redevelopment Plan for Moore Lake
was a opted by the City Council.
November 23. 1981: The Redevelopment Plan for North
Area was adopte by the City Council.
Auqust 22, 1983: The Redevelopment Plan for Center City
was modified by enlargement to include the project areas
formerly included in the Redevelopment Plan for Moore
Lake and the Redevelopment Plan for North Area and was
redesignated as Redevelopment Pzoject No. 1 by the City
Council.
December 19, 1983: The Redevelopment Plan for
Redevelopment Pzoject No. 1 was modified by the estab-
lishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 4
within the project area.
February 27, 1984: The Redevelopment Plan for
Redevelopment Pzoject No. 1 was modified by the estab-
lishment of Tax Increment Financing Distzict No. 5
within the project area.
February 25, 1985: The Redevelopment Plan for
Redevelopment Project No. 1 was modified to provide
technical modifications for purpose of the pzoposed
Fridley tax increment refunding.
November 18, 1985: The Modified Redevelopment Plan for
Redevelopment Pzoject No. 1 was amended to reflect re-
vised project costs to be incurred within Redevelopment
Project No. 1, as set forth in Section I, Subsection
1.1Q hereof.
[�:3
September 22, 1986: The Modified Redevelopment Plan for
Redevelopment Project No. 1 was amended to reflect ze-
vised project costs to be incurred within Redevelopment
Project No. 1, as set forth in Section I, Subsection
l.la hereof.
December 42, 1986: The Modified Redevelopment Plan for
Re evelopment Project No. 1 was amended to reflect re-
vised project costs to be incurred within Redevelopment
Project No. 1, as set forth in Section I, Subsection
1.10 hereof.
The following muniCipal action was taken with regard to
the Tax Increment £inancing Districts comprising portions of
Redevelopment Pzoject No. 1:
Tax Increment Financing District No. 1(Center City):
May 15, 1979: Prior to the enactment of the Tax
Increment Financing Act of 1979 effective August 1,
1974, a separate Tax Inczement Financing Plan was
not required by law but was included as a part of
the originally adopted Redevelopment Plan for
Center City.
Au ust 22, 1983: The Center City Redevelopment
Area was mo i ied by Resolution only (no heazing
required) redesignating the Area as Tax Increment
FinanCing District No. 1.
February 25, 1985: Tax Increment Financing
District No. 1 was modified to facilitate the
refunding of the general obligation tax increment
bonds of the Authority.
Tax Inczement Financing District t3o. 2(Moore Lake):
May 4, 1981: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for
Mooze Lake Redevelopment Area was adopted by the
City Council.
August 22, 1963: The Moore Lake Redevelopment Area
was modifi� by Resolution only (no hearing re-
quired) zedesignating the Area as 2ax Increment
Financing District No. 2.
February 25, 1985: Tax Increment Financing
District No. 2 was modified to facilitate the
refunding of the general obligation tax increment
bonds of the Authority.
�
November 18, 1985: The Tax Increment Financing
Plan for this Tax Increment Financing District was
amended to zeflect and incorporate additional pub-
lic improvement costs anticipated to be incurred
within Redevelopment Project No. 1 pursuant to the
Modified Redevelopment Plan.
September 22, 1986: The Tax Increment Financing
Plan for this Tax Increment Financing District was
amended to reflect and incorporate additional pub-
lic improvement costs anticipated to be incurred
within Redevelopment Project No. 1 pursuant to the
Modified Redevelopment Plan.
December 22, 1986: The Tax Inccement Financing
Plan for this Tax Increment Financing District was
amended to reflect and incorporate additional pub-
lic impzovement costs anticipated to be incurred
within Redevelopment Project No. 1 pursuant to the
Modified Redevelopment Plan.
Tax Increment Financing District No. 3(North Area):
November 23, 1981: The Tax Increment Financing
Plan for North Area Redevelopment Area was adopted
by the City Council.
December 14, 1981: The Tax Increment Financing
Plan for 13orth Area Redevelopment Area was modified
and clarified by the City Council.
August 22, 1983: The North Area Redevelopment Area
was modified by Resolution only (no hearing re-
quired) redesignating the Area as Tax Increment
Financing Distcict No. 3.
February 25, 1985: Tax Increment Financing
District No. 3 was modified to facilitate the
refunding of the general obligation tax increment
bonds of the Authority.
November 18, 1985: The Tax Increment Financing
Plan for this Tax Increment Financing District was
amended to reflect and incorporate additional pub-
lic improvement costs anticipated to be incurred
within Redevelogment Pcoject No. 1 gursuant to the
Modified Redevelopment Plan.
September 22, 1986: The Tax Zncrement Financing
Plan for this Tax Increment Financing District was
.I
amended to reflect and incorporate additional pub-
lic improvement costs anticipated to be incurred
withi� Redevelopment Project No. 1 pursuant to the
Modified Redevelopment Plan.
December 22, 1986: The Tax Increment Financing
Plan for this Tax Increment Financing District was
amended to reflect and incorporate additional pub-
lic improvement costs anticipated to be incurred
vithin Redevelogment Project No. 1 pursuant to the
Modified Redevelopment Plan.
Tax Increment Financing District No. 4:
December 19, 1983: The Tax Increment Financing
Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 was
adopted by the City Council.
February 25, 1985: The Tax Increment Financing
Plan was incozporated into the Master Plan.
November 18. 1985: The Tax Increment Financing
Plan for this Tax Increment Financing District was
amended to reflect and incorporate additional pub-
lic improvement costs anticipated to be incurred
within Redevelopment Project No. 1 pursuant to the
Modified Redevelopment Plan.
Segtember 22, 1986: The Tax Increment Financing
Plan for this Tax Inccement Financing District was
amended to ieflect and incorporate additional �ub-
lic improvement costs anticipated to be incurred
within Redevelopment Project No. 1 pursuant to the
Modified Redevelopment Plan.
December 22. 1986: The Tax Increment Financing
Plan for this Tax Increment Financing District was
amended to reflect and incorporate additional pub-
lic improvement costs anticipated to be incurred
within Redevelopment Project No. 1 pursuant to the
Modified Redevelopment Plan.
Tax Increment Financing District No. 5:
February 27, 1984: The Tax Increment Financing
Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 was
adopted by the City Council.
February 25. 1985: The Tax Increment Financing
Plan was incorpocated into the Master Plan.
6E
November 18. 1985: The Tax Increment Financing
Plan or this Tax Increment Financing District was
amended to reflect and incorporate additional pub-
lic improvement costs anticipated to be incurred
within Redevelopment Project No. 1 pursuant to the
Modified Redevelopment Plan.
Se tember 22, 1986: The Tax Increment Financing
Plan or this Tax Increment Financing District was
amended to reflect and incorporate additional pub-
lic improvement costs anticipated to be incurred
within Redevelopment Ytoject No. 1 pucsuant to the
Modified Redevelopment Plan.
December 22, 198b: The Tax increment Financing
Plan for this Tax Increment Financing District was
amended to reflect and incorporate additional pub-
lic impzovement costs anticipated to be incurred
within Redevelopment Project No. 1 pursuant to the
Modified Redevelopment Plan.
Tax Increment Financing District No. 6:
November 18, 1985: The Tax Increment Financing
P an for Tax Increment Financing District No. 6 was
adopted by the City Council.
September 22, 1986: The Tax Increment Financing
Plan for this Tax Increment Financing District was
amended to reflect and incorpotate additional pub-
lic improvement costs anticipated to be incurred
within Redevelopment Project No. 1 puzsuant to the
Modified Redevelopment Plan.
December 22, 1986: The Tax Increment Financing
Plan for this Tax Ir.crement Financing District was
amended to zeflect and incorporate additional pub-
lic improvement costs anticipated to be incurred
within Redevelopment Project No. 1 pursuant to the
Modified Redevelopment Plan.
Tax Increment Financing District No. 7:
September 22, 1986: The Tax Increment Financing
Plan for this Tax Increment Financing District was
approved by the Fridley City Council.
December 22, 1986: The Tax Increment Financing
Plan or this Tax increment Financing District was
6F
amended to reflect and incorporate
lic improvement costs anticipated
within Redevelopment Project No. 1
Modified Redevelopment Plan.
Tax Zncrement Financing District No. 8:
additional pub-
to be incurred
pursuant to the
September 22, 1986: The Tax Inczement Financing
Plan foc this Tax Increment Financing District was
approved by the Fzidley City Council.
December 22, 1986: The Tax Increment Financing
Plan for this Tax Increment Financing District was
amended to reflect and incorporate additional pub-
lic improvement costs anticipated to be incurred
within Redevelopment Project No. 1 pursuant to the
Modified Redevelopment Plan.
6G
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(This Table of Contents is not part of the Modified
Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plans, and is
only for convenience of reference.)
PAGE
SECTION I. MODIFIED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 (CENTER
CITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA)
Subsection l.l.
Subsection 1.2.
Subsection 1.3.
Subsection 1.4.
Subsection 1.5.
Subsection 1.6.
Subsection 1.7.
Subsection 1.8.
Subsection 1.9.
Subsection 1.10
Subsection
Subsection
Subsection
Subsection
Subsection
1.11.
1.12.
1.13.
1.14.
1.15.
Definitions ........................1-1
Introduction.. .. . ....1-3
Statement and Finding of�Public
Purpose.. .. .................1-3
Statutory�Authority ................1-B
Statement of Objectives............1-9
Boundaries of Redevelopment
Project No. 1.. . . ..... .....1-11
Soundary Maps of�Redevelopment
Project No. 1.. . . . . .....1-11
Parcels to be Acquired.in Whole
or in Part Within Redevelopment
Pzoject No. 1 .. .. ...............1-il
Estimated Public Improvement
Costs and Supportive Data.........1-12
Public Improvements and
Facilities Within Redevelopment
Froject No. 1 .. ..... ............1-15
Environmental Controls............1-16
Proposed Reuse of Property........1-17
Administration and Maintenance
of Redevelopment Project No. 1....1-17
Rehabilitation .............•••••••1-17
Relocation ........................1-17
EXHIBIT I-A-1 Description of Property Constituting
Redevelopment Project No. 1, as
Established on May 15, 1979 .............I-A-1
ERHIBIT I-A-2 Description of Additional Property
Within Redevelopment Project No. 1,
as Modified August 22, 1983 .............I-A-2
EXHIBIT I-B-1 Boundary Map of Redevelopment Project
No. 1, as Established on
May 15. 1979 ............................I-B-1
EXAIHIT I-8-2 Boundary Map of Redevelopment Project
No. 1, as Modified August 22, 1983......I-B-2
(i)
6H
Engineering, Design and Planning,
Legal, Fiscal, Bond Issuance
Expenses and Discount and
Miscellaneous
Contingency
Bond Debt Service Reserves
Capitalized Bond Interest
Total Project Costs
Maximum Honded Indebtedness
1,050,000
300,000
2,612,000
3,1�000
$18,500,000
$18,500,000
(The following amendment of Subsection 1.10 hereof was
apgtoved on September 22, 1986.)
Additional public impzovement costs to be incurred
within Redevelopment Project No. 1 and to be financed by tax
increments derived from all tax increment financing dis-
tricts within Redevelopment Project No. 1 are estimated to
be:
Land Acquisition/Writedown Costs
$ ioo,000
(The following amendment of Subsection 1.10 hereof was
approved on Decembez 22, 1986.}
Additional public improvement costs to be incurred
within Redevelopment Project No. 1 and to be financed by tax
increments derived from all tax increment financing dis-
tricts within Redevelopment ProjeCt No. 1 are estimated to
be:
University Avenue/84th Street HouSing Project:
Land Acquisition/Improvement/Writedown Costs 5 850,000
Capitalized Interest 290.091
Bond Discount 23,330
Issuance Costs and Contingency 2b,579
Total Additional Project Costs
and/or Honded Indebtedness
Maximum Additional A3ministrative Costs
$1,19Q,000
$ 94,000
Subsection 1.11. Environmental Controls. The pzoposed
development in Redevelopment Project No. 1 does not present
significant environmental concerns. All municipal actions,
public improvements and pzivate development shall be carried
out in a manner consistent with existing environmental stan-
dards.
1 - 16
6I
As of November 18, 1985, September 22, 1986, and
December 22, 1986, the Tax increment Financing Plan for Tax
Increment Fina— nc g District No. 2 was•modified to reflect
revised project costs to be incuzred within Redevelopment
Project No. 1 as a result of the amendment of the Modified
Redevelopment Plan.
3 - 6
6J
replace said bonds with tax increment revenue
bonds.
As of t3ovember 18, 1985, September 22, 1986, and
December 22, 1986, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax
Increment Financing District No. 3 was modified to reflect
revised project costs to be incurred within Redevelopment
Project No. 1 as a result of the amendment of the Modified
Redevelopment Plan.
4 - 6
6K
incorporation of the tax increment financing plan
for Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 into the
Master Plan, composed of the Modified Redevelopment -
Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1 and the
Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax
Increment Financing Districts 1 through 5.
Modification of the Tax Increment Financing Plan
for Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 to
facilitate the refunding of existing general
obligation tax increment bonds issued for payment
of public activities within the project area and to
replace said bonds with tax increment revenue
bonds.
As of Novembez 18, 1985, September 22. 1986, and
December 22� 1986 the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax
Inctement Financing District No. 4 was modified to reflect
revised project costs to be incurred within Redevelopment
Project No. 1 as a result of the amendment of the Modified
Redevelopment Plan.
5 - 4
6L
Modification of the Tax Increment Financing Plan
for Tax Increment Financing Dtstrict No. 5 to
facilitate the refunding of existing general
obligation tax increment bonds issued for payment
of public activities within the project area and to
replace said bonds with tax increment revenue
bonds.
As of November 18, 1985, September 22, 1986, and
December 22, 1986, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax
Increment Financing Distzict No. 5 was modified to reflect
revised project costs to be incurred within Redevelopment
Project No. 1 as a result of the amendment of the Modified
Redevelopment Plan.
6 - 4
s��
Subsection 7.13. Tax Increment Financing Account sor
Tax Increment Financin District No. 6. The tax increment
receive with respect to Tax Increment•Financing District -
No. 6 will be segregated by the Authority in a special
account or accounts (the "Tax Inczement Account") on its
official books and records or as otherwise established by
resolution of the City to be held for the benefit of owners
of Tax Inczement Bonds.
Subsection 7.14. Land Disposition and Redevelopezs'
R_eq�uir�e�m�ents. All Redevelopezs or Developer will be re-
quir—` eci by contractual agreement to observe the building
requirements and zoning requirements of the City, and such
other cequirements as may be established by the City Coun-
cil. Land disposition parcels shall be made available under
separate cover as they are determined by the Authority.
The Authority proposes to consumate a certain Contract
for Private Development (the "Contract"), with Woodbridge
Properties, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, concerning the
public and private development of the property within Tax
Inczement FinanCing District No. 6.
Subsection 7.15. Modification of Tax Increment
Financing District No. 6. As af September 22, 1986, and
December 22, 1986, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax
Increment inancing District No. 6 was modified to reflect
revised project costs to be incurred witAin Aedevelopment
Project No. 1 as a zesult of the amendment of the Modified
Redevelopment Plan.
7 - 3
6PJ
Bond sales Will be based on availability of tax increment.
It is contemplated that all bonds will not be issued at one _
time but as they are needed, at effective interest rates
estimated to range between 6.SOt and 10.00i per annum.
Subsection 8.13. Tax Increment Financinq Account for
Tax Increment Financin Distiict No. 7. The tax increment
receive with respect to Tax Increment Financing District
No. 7 will be segregated by the Authority in a special
account or accounts (the "Tax Increment Account") on its
official books and records or as otherwise established by
resolution of the City to be held for the benefit of owners
of Tax Increment Bonds.
Subsection 8.14. Land Dis osition and Redevelo ers'
Re uirements. All redevelopers or evelopers will be re-
quire by contractual agreement to observe the building
zequirements and zoning requirements of the City, and such
other requirements as may be established by the City Coun-
cil. Land disposition parcels shall be made available under
separate cover as they are determined by the Authoiity.
The Authority proposes to consumate a certain Contract
for Private Development (the "Contract"), with Winfield
Developments, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, concerning the
public and private development of the property within Tax
Increment Financing District No. 7.
Subsection 8.15. Modification of Tax Increment
Financing District No. 7./�AS of December 22, 1986, the Tax
Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing Dis-
trict No. 7 was modified to reflect revised project costs to
be incurzed within Redevelopment Pro}ect t1o. 1 as a result
of the amendment of the Modified Redevelopment Plan.
� 8 - 3
.t
time but as they are needed, at effective interest rates
estimated to range between 6.SOg and 10.008 per annum.
Subsection 9.13. Tax Inczement Financing Account for
Tax Increment Financing District No. S. The tax increment
received with respect to Tax Increment Financing District
No. 8 will be segregated by the Authority in a special
account or accounts (the "Tax Increment Account") on its
official books and records or as otherwise established by
resolution of the City to be held for the benefit of owners
of Tax Increment Bonds.
Subsection 9.14. Land Dis sition and Redevelo ers'
Requirements. All redevelopers or evelopers will be re-
quired by contractual agzeement to observe the building
zequirements and zoning requirements of the City, and such
other requirements as may be established by the City Coun-
cil. Land disposition parcels shall be made available under
separate cover as they aze detezmined by the Authority.
The Authority proposes to consumate a certain Contract
foz Pzivate Development (the "Contract"), with Shorewood,
Inc., a Minnesota corporation, concerning the public and
private development of the pzoperty within Tax Increment
Financing District No. 8.
Subsection 9.15. Modification of Tax Increment
Financing District No. 8.^ As of December 22, 1986, the Tax
Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing Ais-
tzict No. 8 was modified to teflect revised project costs to
be incurzed within Redevelopment Project No. 1 as a result
of the amendment of the Modified Redevelopment Plan.
9 - 3
_
_
CITYOF
FRIDLEY
PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
��D �: Jim Aobinson, Planning Coordimtor
!£PD 11�.7£: I1azy1 Motey, F'larn►ing Aseistat►t t�,'..
1Ll�D nARE: Deciember 4, 198b
R6C�DI1�G: Wayne Dak�l Qinic Aarkiug
Pursuant to Wayne Lhhl's variance request, VAR #86-24, I have reviewed the
�rking situation foz the other two clinics located in Fridley: the Plaza
Q inic, 6341 University Avenue and the FYidley M�edical Clinic, T675 Madison
Street.
'Ihe Plaza Qinic has 32,750 square feet of building space and 186 parking
stalls (with the new packing lot addition) fot a building space to parking
stall ratio of 1:175. �e fYidley Hedical Qinic has 15,980 square feet of
building spaoe, 92 parking stalls and a building sFace to Farking stall ratio
of 1:175 as well.
�e current plans for wayne Dahl's clinic call for 8,000 squase feet of
building sFece (1,600 sqiare feet for the current clinic t 6,400 square feet
for the pro�sed new building) with 39 Farking stalls. �e building space to
parking stall ratio �niier this plan is 1:205.
�e attached glan shaws how �e site would look with the 1:175 ratio that the
other two clirucs cuurently have• Under this g].an, the proposed new building
would be reduced in size frcm b,400 square feet to 5,900 square feet. Zhe
total building sFace �.aider this glan would be 7,500 square f eet, a reduction
of 500 square fee� �e sFsce freed up t� reducing the size of the proposed
building would allow for 43 g3rking stalls, an increase of four stalls. The
r,ew building spaoe to �arking ratio would then be 1:175.
�e parking criteria for cluucs in four neic�boring cities is as follvas:
CITY
GJOR Rdp.LC�S
Bcooklyn Oentec
Brooklyn Fgrk
Nc� Bri�ton
Colunbia Heights
PARFCING RATIO
4 spaces pez doctor. 1 space per 150 square feet
of net floor area. They calculate both and
negotiate somewhere in 6etween.
1 spaoe per 150 sguaze feet of gros& floor area.
3 spaces per doctor or 1 space per 150 square feet
of gross floor area, whichevez is greater.
1 sFsce per 200 aquace feet of cuoss floor area.
3 spaoes per doctor.
�
� Jim RAbinson
l�cembec 4, 1986
P-age 2
Fdir�a
Blaine
Spzing Lake I�rk
Abunds View
1 spaoe per 200 square feet of gross floor area
plus 1 sFace per doctor on duty.
2 spaces per euam room glus 1 space per each
doctor and engloyee.
6 spaces per 1.000 sguare feet of gross floor
area.
1 space per 100 square feet of net floor area or 7
1/2 spaces pec doctoc, whichever is greatec.
Based on the Fsrking specifications of the cities in our survey, as well as
the inadequate Farking situation �esent at our tsvo rYidley clinics, I would
rc�enrnend armiending the City Code to read "At least one (1) off-street Farking
sFace shall be prw ided for each 150 s�uare feet of building floor area for
all medical and dental clinics."
M- 86-294
lA
�
�
CITYOF
FRIDLEY
PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
!�U �: Jim Aobineoai, Planning Cbordinator
!�@D PIiOM: Dacyl lbrey, Planning Assistant'�V�
!@l7 m�: Deomber 4, 1986
ABC�RDI1�: Soning Reguic�ts for Q►ur�
I iecently conducted a survey of adjacent cities reaarding parking
requirenents for churches. Zhe results are as follaas:
CITY
Brooklyn Rark
Coon Rapids
New Bric�ton
Colunbia Heights
Eciiria
Blaire
S�ring Lake F6rk
Mo�ds View
Maple Grwe
PARKING RATIO
1 sFace per 2 1/2 seats.
Allowed in all residential districts with a G U. P.
1 space per 3 fixed seats, or 1 space pez 5 feet
of pew length. or 1 space per 100 square feet of
area when m fixed seats or pews.
Allowed in all residential districts with a S. U. P.
and allowed in Conummity Comnercial District with
strict S. U. P. restrictions.
1 spaoe per 3 seats, or 1 space per 5 feet of pew
length.
Allowed in all residential districts and
Ca�miercial/Industrial Distcicts with a S. U. P.
1 space per 3 1/2 seats.
Allowed in all residential districts with a G U.P.
1/3 of t3�e maxunun seatina ca�acity.
Allowed in all residential districts with a S.U.P.
1 space per 4 seats.
Allowed in all residential districts with �. U. P.
Addition3l setbacks may be r�uired.
1 space per 3 seats, or 1 npace per 5 feet of pew
length.
Allowed in all residential and commercial
distLicts wi� a S.U. P.
1 space per 4 seats.
Allowed in all residential districts with a S. U. P_
1 sFace ner 3 seats.
Allowed in all residential districts with a G U.P.
7C
Jim Idobinson
December 4, 1986
Page 2
Based on the parking specifications of the cities in our survey. I would
reoomnend that the City Code be ammended to state that "Building and site
requirenents and performance �tandards be equal to or greater than those
outlined in the CR-1 section of the Code with the exception of parking
requirenents, which will be measured b� t2�e followina criteria: At least one
(1) off-street parking sFace shall be prwided for e✓eiy 3 fixed seats or for
every 5 feet of pew �ength in the mai.n assanhly hall. Additional seatinq may
be required for additional churc3� activities, suc3� as: dav-�are and classroom
facilities, and recraational activities.
1�86-315
CITY OF FRIDLEY
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, NOVEMBER 13, 1986
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Commers called the November 13, 1986, Housing & Redevelopment
Authori[y meeting to order at 7:08 p.m.
ROLL G1LL :
Members Present: Larry Commers, Virginia Schnabel, John Meyer and
Duane Prairie
Members Absent: Walter Rasmussen
Others Present: Jock Robertson, HRA Executive Director
Nasim Qureshi, City Manager
Dave Newman, HRA Attorney
Rick Pribyl, Finance Director
Julie Burt, Asst. Finance Officer
Ken Belgarde, University Avenue Associates
Linda Fisher, Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren
Sherrill Kuretich, Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren
Bob Levy, 100 S. Sth Street
Richard Diamond of the Levy Law Firm
Ron Schoneman, Rice Plaza Shopping Center Tenant
Mr. & Mrs. Trocke, kice Plaza Shopping Center Tenants
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 23. 1986:
MOTION BY MS, SCHNABEL, SECONDED BY MFt. PRAIRIE, TO APPkOVE THE MINUTES AS
PRESENTED.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES OF OCTOBER 9. 1986:
MOTION BY MR, MEYER, SECONDED BY MS. SCHNABEL, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS
PRESENTED.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
1
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING NOVEMBER 13 1986 PAGE 2
Mr. Newman stated, due to difficulties in their office, the draft
of the development agreement is not before the HRA this evening.
He stated he has met with representatives of University Avenue
Associates and, with the exception of one issue, there is agreement
on the basic concept. He stated he would Like to review the concept
and have the agreement before the HRA at the next meeting.
Afr. Newman stated the developers went through the Environmental 6s:,ess-
ment Worksheet process and need to obtain another governmental permit
which means a later closing date on the property. He stated when the
development agreement is executed it would include elevations for
the buildings, a description of the materials to be used, the design
of the buiLdings, and landscaping, parking and drainage plans. He
stated there wi11 be specific exhibits which outline the standards
for this develooment.
Mr. Newman ,r.ated it is proposed the HRA would provide assistance in
the form of a second mortgage at $850,000 at an interest rate of 8%.
He stated the payment schedule will be consistent as to what was
proposed for the Lundgren project. He stated there would be no pay-
ments for the first three years, payment of interest only for years
four and five, and payment of interest plus principal for years six
through fifteen. hh-. Newman stated the developer is proposing that
payment of interest and principal wouldn't be in equal amounts and to
pay one-half of the interest and at the end of the 15 years, the balloon
would consist of the remaining principal plus any interest,
Mr. Newman stated the HRA would acquire the land and convey it back to
the developer at a cost not to exceed $850,000. He stated construction
is proposed to begin no later than June 1, 1987 in order to allow
time for the necessary permits. He stated the complex would consist
of nine buildings with the Last building ronstructed in 1990.
Mr. Newman stated the developers are reluctant to provide a letter of
credit as they want to use these funds for their construction. He
stated, in Lieu of a letter of credit, the developers would provide a
personal guarantee. He stated the net worth of this partnership is
quite substantial and verification would have to be provided. He stated
the guarantee wou'id continue until the project is cbmpLeted and the
second mortgage is satisfied. He stated if there was a substantial change
in the developer's net worth, the HRA would have to be notified so they
could request other security. He stated these are details which still
need to be worked out.
I�fr. Newman stated the values discussed and to be contained in the
agreement are as follows: $1.6 million as of Sanuary 2, 1988; $4.3
million as of 1989; $6.75 million as of 1990; and $9.2 million as of
1991. He stated this is a value of approximately $22,000 per unit
and takes into consideration an inflationary factor.
Mr. Co�ners asked if that was the fair market value of the units for
tax purposes.
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING NOVEMBER 13 1986 PAGE 3
Mr. Qureshi stated it is the average market value the Assessor
carries on the books. He stated if the Assessor feels the values
are greater, these figures could be raised. He stated these
assessment values are minimum levels and could be subject to change.
Mr. Camners staCed a letter of credit was required for the Lundgren
project and asked why the HI2A should change the policy.
Ph. Newman stated although a letter of credit was required for I�h�.
Lundgren's project, there are a number of projects where the HRA
didn't supply the funds until the project was completed. Ae stated
he didn't feel a great deal of precedent had been set when assistance
is provided in the form of a second mortgage. He stated it has been
his experience that developers don't like the letter of credit as it
takes away the use of funds for other projects. He stated if their
financial statements are as strong as indicated, their personal net
worth should be sufficient to guarantee the mortgage. He stated
there is one issue to which the developers are not in total agreement
and that is the repayment schedule of the mortgage.
Ms. Kuretich, representing the developers, stated their concern in
repayment of the mortgage is not the amount, but the time schedule for
the payments. She stated the developers would like the HRA to consider
the possibility of no interest payments being made in the fourth and
fifth years of the mortgage and extended these payments over the last
ten years of the mortgage.
Ms. Kuretich stated the project wouldn't be completed for four years
and, as the scheduLe now stands, the developers would be required to
make payments on the second mortgage before the project is totally
completed and before they receive their fu11 income irom this develop-
ment. She stated they are aLso concerned about meeting debt service
coverage requirements on the first mortgage, if these interest payments
have to be made to the HRA in the fourth and fifth years,
Mr. Commers asked if the developers would be willing to make these
interest payments if funds were ovaila5le and, if not, it could be
paid over the balance of the mortgage.
Ms. Kuretich stated this possibility would have to be reviewed with
the developers.
Mr. Commers asked why the HRA just couldn't provide the seccrd mortgage
and not go through the process of conveying the land.
Mr. Qureshi stated it has to be shawn that the HRA took certain action to
assist the developers and 6y buying and conveying the land, the criteria
under the State statute is met.
Mr. Commers asked if there would be pu6lic improvements involved i❑ this
project.
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT Ai)TfIORITY MEETING NOVEMBER 13 1986 PAGE 4
Mr. Qureshi stated the developers are providing all the utilities
and drainage with no assistance from the HRA. He stated the HRA's
assistance is only in the land write-down and second mortgage.
He stated there is the potential for future assessments on this
proper[y when access roads are provided to the north.
Mr. Qureshi stated when the concept of this apartment complex wss
presented to the HRA, consideration was being given to the develop-
ment proposed by Mr. Lundgren. He stated this project is, apparently,
no longer viable and the developer is not able to perform. He stated
he wanCed to make the NRA aware that this project of University
Avenue Associates could have an affect on potential development in
the southwest quadrant of Mississippi and University.
Mr. Meyer asked if an access to 85th Avenue would be provided as
part oF this project.
Mr. Qureshi stated 60 feet of right-of-way would be dedicated on the
north of this project to provide for future access.
Ms. Schnabel stated she is concerned if there would be no payments
made in the first five years, and questioned the personal guarantee.
Mr. Commers asked what the interest payments would be in the fourth
and fifth years.
Mr. Newman stated the interest would be about $68,000 per year for
these two years.
Mr. Newman stated a letter of credit is easier to collect and a greater
level of security as funds are earmarked for this purpose. He stated,
from the developer's standpoint, it does freeze some of their assets.
Re stated a personal guarantee would guarantee the payment of the
taxes and would terminate when development is cnmpleted. He stated
payments on the second mortgage would also be guaranteed and would
continue until the mortgage is paid, t�. Newman stated one of the
difficulties in [his type of development is the period when no income
is generated. He stated there is generally a cash shortage in the
first several years and is why no payments were proposed for the
first three years in order to assist the developer.
Ms. Schnabel stated she understands what Mr, Newman is saying, but it
still bothers her if no payments are made for five years. She felt
another possibility may be a letter of credit equal to the interest
payments.
Mr. Co�¢ners asked what would be the amount of a letter of credit for
this project.
Mr. Qureshi stated it would probably 6e $400,000 which amounts to about
50% of the assistance provided by the HRA. He stated a compromise
may be to have the developer provide a personal guarantee and a lower
amount for the letter of credit.
AOUSING & REDEVEi.OPPfEtvT AUTAORITY MEETING NOVEMBER 13 1986 PAGE 5
Mr. Commers stated he believed there is some reluctance not to have
any payments for five years, but possibly s compromise could be worked
out in regard to the letter of credit and personal guarantee.
2.
Rll
Mr, Prairie stated if a letter of credit for $400,000 would normally
be provided, probably the compromise could be for e letter of credit
in the amount of $200,000.
Ms. Schnabel £elt if a letter of credit is not ptovided for this
pxoject, it could possibly set a precedent. She.stated she would Like
to see some form of a letter of credit tu secure part of their invest-
ment.
Mr, Meyer stated he would agree with Ms. Schnabel's position.
Mr. Commers stated he believed staff had some feedback regarding the
HRA's feelings and hoped to have the agreement at the next meeting.
Pff . Qureshi stated this resolution requests the City Council to call
for a public review on an amendment to the financing plan for the
tax increment districts in order to provide $850,OOD in assistance
to the University Avenue Associates apartment project.
MUTION BY MS, SCHNABEL, SECONDED BY MR. MEYER, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION N0,
HRA 20-1986.
UPOtd A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Commers sta[ed the agenda packet contains a letter from staff dated
November 7, 1986 recommending the HRA draw on Mr. Lundgren'S letter of
credit, He stated Mr. Lundgren has also submitted a letter dated
November 7, 1986 requesting the HI2A refrain from drawing on the letter
of credit.
Mr. Qureshi stated s[aff feels Mr. Lundgren has been given adequate
time to obtain his financing in order to proceed with this projec[
and would recommend the HI2A draw on the Letter of credit.
Ms. Kuretich, representing Mr. Lundgren, stated Mr. Lundgren is no[
able to be here [his evening as he is Chairing an International
Housing Conference in Toronto. She stated, as long as the HRA has
HOUSING & REDEVE�OPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING NOVEMBER 13 1986 PAGE 6
no other developers for this site, Mr, Lundgren would appreciate
the HRA's continued patience as he is trying to work out the
financing for this project. She stated if the HRA draws on this
let[er of credit, i[ would further reduce any opportunity for
Mr. Lundgren to proceed.
Ms. Kuretich stated if there should be another developer for this
site, the HRA has the right to negotiate with them. She stated a11
they are asking is the HRA to refrain from drawing on the letter of
credit at this time.
Ptr. Qureshi stated if the HRA draws on the letter of credit and if,
for some reason, the Luadgren does proceed, this $200,000 could be made
available to Mr. Lundgren.
Mr. Meyer stated he is reluctant to draw on the letter of credit,
unless it is felt the HRA has been hurt i❑ some manner. He felt
if the HRA hasn't earned the letter of credit, they shouldn't have
it. He felt by exercicing this right, they may be jeopardizing
future development in the City if a good business ciirtiate isn't
presented.
Mr. Prairie sta[ed, on the other hand, if the HRA has a Letter of
credit and doesn't proceed to draw on it, this requirement may not
be taken seziously.
Pfr . Meyer stated Mr. Lundgren indicated at the Last meeting he had
spent over $500,000 in plans and specifications for this project.
He fe1t, therefore, hfr. Lundgren was serious on proceeding.
Mr. Qureshi stated proposals for development create a certain 1eve1
of concern in the neighborhood and felt the HRA and City CounciL.is
sensitive to the fact that these proposals are not entertained unless
the developer is serious.
l�fr, prairie stated action on this item could be postponed until the
December meeting, even though some interest would be lost. He felt
if a developer had several projects and faced the possibility of
losing $200,000, this would be a motivation factor.
MOTION BY MR. MEYER, SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRIE, TO TABLE THIS ITEM RE-
LATING TO THE LOU LUND Q2EN LETTER OF CREDIT.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, MR. MEYER, MH. PRAIRIE, AND MR, CON4fERS VOTED IN
FAVOR OF THE MOTION. I�S. SCHNABEL VOTED AGAINST THE MOTION. CAAIR-
PERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED BY A 3 TO 1 VOTE,
Mr. Commers requested staff place this item on the agenda for the next
HRA meeting.
3A. RICE PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER:
Mr. Commers stated the HItA has had considerable discussion, both jointly
with the City Council and on their own, regarding the possible acquisition
of the Rice Plaza Shopping Center. He stated he understands the issue
is whether or no[ the HRA should acquire the property ati this time for
$1,008,000.
�
�
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING NOVEMBER 13 1986 PAG� �
Mr. Richard Diamond, Ateorney with Mr. Levy's law firm, stated the
owner of this property is Bob Levy's father who has had a famiiy
relationship with the City for over 30 years with this property and
the Holly Shopping Center property.
I+�. Diamond stated the HRA members have a good feeling as to what
has happened regarding this property and wan[ed to review what is
on record. He stated 'it looks to him Like what happened is simply
a question of fairness.
Mr. Diamond stated at some point in time, the HRA is going to take
this piece of property. He stated they are here this evening to
encourage the HRA to make a determination regarding this parcel.
He stated there apparently has been some form of agreement as to
the market value of the property. He stated this is very unusual
where there is agreement to the price before a philosophical agree-
ment if the property should be taken.
Mr. Diamond stated there is a new tax 1aw coming into effect and
didn't know what it would do to development. He stated one [hing
they do know, from the owner's perspective, the new tax laws wi11
nave a serious impact on [he net value as opposed to the market
value on that property. He stated the figure they can agree on this
evening and what makes sense today may not be the same in the next
several months.
Th. Diamond stated as time goes on, the owner is dealing with a
situation that is uncertain. He stated it is difficult to operate
a property as a private owner without knowing what the public body
is going to do or knowing something wi11 be dane, but when.
Mr, Diamond stated the history goes 6ack to 1979. He stated in May,
1980, a private developer proposed a project which didn't work out.
He stated there was discussio❑ on record about several businessmen
in Che area feeling jolted at that time because they weren't sure what
would happen with the project. He stated in July, 1980, the Standard
station was considered for a lease for a I�'k. Donut franchise. He
stated in 1981, htr. Boardman spoke about tenants in the area being
upset, and another project which didn't work out. He stated a
brocfiure was compiled in 1984 which stated it was only a matter of
time before projects developed. He stated the HRA decided not to
distribute this brochure.
Mr. Diamond stated Mr. Lundgren has come in with a proposed project
and the owners signed an agreement in January and it has been dis-
cussed ever since.
Ptr. Diamond stated the HRA is in the situation where there has been
a purchase price negotiated of $1,008,000. He stated the County
is working on widening Mississippi Street and a portion of the
property will be taken and the funds for this acquisition wi11 not
be coming from the HI2A,
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING NOVEMBER 13 1986 PAGE 8
Mr. Diamond stated he recognizes it has to be in everyone's minds
that Ah�. Lundgren is having difficulty in proceeding with his
project and even faces the possibility of forfeiting his letter of
credit. He stated the Levy people are saying to take this land now.
He stated the question may we11 become if the HRA can put itself
into the position to have a piece of land that cannot in the fore-
seeable future be developed. He stated that is a valid concern.
I•h�. Diamond sta[ed the question is where the burden should lie. He
stated if the property is Left in limbo, as it has been for the Last
several years, should the impact be on the public body or shifted
totally to the private individuals. He stated it seems logical that
the parcel will be developed, however, the question is when wi11 a
determination be aade to go ahead and acquire the property.
Mr. Diamond stated he would suggest because of the combination of
factors now, it is appropriate for the HRA to make that decision.
He felt the owners and tenants should be made comfortable with the
situation so they can go on with their lives.
hh. Qureshi felt it should be recognized this is onLy one parcel
of property and the HRA has a number of other properties in the
tax increment districts. He s[ated the HRA's position is not to
acquire property unless there is a proposed development or use for it.
He stated it was hoped, if the Lundgren project proceeded, it would
give the HRA a valid reason to acquire this property. He stated the
tenants' problems will be there, eve❑ if the IIRA acquires the property.
He stated experience has shown it isn't good to own property, unless
there is a use for it.
I�fr. Commers stated the HItA has been through [his discussion so many
times, he felt a motio❑ would be in order so everyone would have a
chance to express their views.
MOTION BY MEt. MEYER TO ACQUIRE THE RICE PLAZA SHOPPING CENPER PROPEATY.
Mr. Commers asked Mr. Newman if he could second the motion. Mr. Newman
s[ated he understands the Chairperson cannot second the motion.
Mr. Prairie stated nothing has changed since the last meeting, but
there may have been movement on the other project which has some effect
on this item.
Mr. Newman stated one of Mr. Levy's frustrations was there wasn't a
definitive action on the HRA's part because there was no second to
the motion at the last meeting.
Mr. Qureshi asked why it was critical to be on record that the HItA
didn't want to acquire the property.
Mr. Newman stated Mr. Levy was asking for some action one way or the
other.
THERE BEING NO SECOND TO THE ABOVE MOTION, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED
THE MOTION FAILED FOR IACK OF A SECOND.
HOUSING & REDF.VELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, NOVEMBER 13, 1986 PAGE 9
MOTION BY MS, SCHNABEL, SECONDED BY MR, MEYER, FOR THE HRA NOT TO
ACQUIRE THE RICE PIAZA SHOPPING CENTER AT THIS TIME.
Mr, prairie stated he felt bad for the property owners because develop-
men[ has been delayed. He stated the problem is that several years ago
the HRA purchased property as they thought they had a developer and
it didn't work out. He stated the HRA was subjected to criticism
that they shouldn't own land. He stated he is sensi[ive to having
the same thing happen again.
Mr. Meyer stated he respected the views of the other HRA members and
the City Manager that the HRA not acquire property unless there is a
need for it. He stated it seems, in this case, it is a different
situation as this redevelopment district has been targeted as the
HRA's number one priority. He stated that, in itself, establishes
the HRA has a use for the property, He stated there have been a
number of deveiopers showing an interest in developing and felt it
was in the City's best interest to pursue development of the property.
He felt they have a use for the property even thou�h it may not be
in the immediate future and for that reason, thec should proceed with the
purchase of the property.
Ms. Schnabel stated her posi[ion really hasn't changed. She stated
it is a philosophical one if the HRA should own property. She felt
the presentation was good on behalf of the owner, but she wasn't
persuaded why the HRA should purchase the property. Ms. Schnabel
didn't feel the HRA should become landlords. She stated at any time
in the future, if a developer has a concrete proposal, she would be
more than willing to purchase the property. She stated she appreci-
ated the Levy's contribu[ions to the City, but didn't feel it was the
kiR.�'s responsibility to try and cure some of the problems coming
out of Washington with the new tax laws.
Mr. Commers stated he favors the purchase of the property at this time.
He stated he agrees with past practices for the fiRA not to become
landlords, but exceptions do arise. He stated the Civic Center project
was the HRA's prime goal and one of the most critical parts is the
southwest quadrant of Mississippi and University. He felt in the
last few years, the HRA has been distracted from Cheir goals and was
concerned about Losing their direction and proceeding with other
projects. He stated he felt it was in the best interests of the
citi2ens of Fridley to acquire this property.
UPON A ROLL CALL VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, MS. SCHNABEL AND MR,
PRAIRIE VOTED IN FAVOR. M2. COMMERS AND MR, MEYER VOTED ACAINST THE
MOTION. CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION FAILED FOR TJ+CK OF
A MAJORTTY.
4. UPDATE ON LAKE POINTE:
Mr. Robertson stated_ earthwork is ahead of schedule and all building
pads, except A and D, are almost completed. He stated there are some
problems with the final alignment of Lake Pointe Drive in the northeast
corner.
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING NOVEMBER 13 1986 PAGE 10
Mr. Qureshi stated the original plan for this development was
approved by the HI2A and City Council and the deveioper wishes to
make a change which would affect the road alignment. He stated
the City has asked the develorer to submit a plan, that works under
any scenario, to determine what adjustments could be made to
acco�mnodate them.
Mr. Qureshi stated a meeting was held between him, t�fr. Newman, Mr.
Weir and Mr. Deike to see how this issue could be resolved, however,
to this date, no request has been received from the developer. He
stated the City has to know their needs so they can work with [hem to
resolve the problem.
hk. Qureshi stated staff's position is to proceed with the plans
approved by the HRA and City Council and to fulfill the obligations.
He stated it is hoped Mr. Weir wi11 take the same approach.
Mr. Commers asked if there are any time frames that if Woodbridge
didn't proceed with the project, they would be in default.
Ah. Newman stated his recollection is Woodbridge is to commence
construction by December 1, but would have to verify this in the
development agreement. Ae stated Woodbridge has indicated tney
have pulled their engineer and aTChitect off the project.
Mr. Newman stated under the terms of the agreement, the $1,000,000
was to be released when the plat was recorded and rezoning compLeted.
He stated one of the contentions is the alignment of the road. He
stated he has been in contact with the developer and met with Mr. Weir
and his Legal counsel to come up with some solutions, but they haven't
responded.
Mr. Newman stated he contacted Sunde Engineering and indicated the
City wanted the pla[ released. He stated Sunde probably has a❑ ethical
problem because Woodbridge is their client. t�fr. Newman stated he
contacted Suburban Engineering yesterday and would like to make
provisions with them to complete the pLatting. He stated the City HgA
is the property owner and owner of record and has the right to proceed
and plat the property.
Mr. Commers asked the cost if Suburban Engineering platted the pro-
perty.
Mr. Newman stated Suburban Engineering would have to recertify the
descriptions at a cost of about $1,500. He stated the greatest cost
is in placing of the monuments which would amount to several.thousand
dollars. He feit the whole thing could be done for abou[ $5,000.
He stated the platting process would probably take several weeks
and once it is recorded, the title insurance company would be notified
to r<_lease the $1,000,�00. He stated it is anticipated Mr. Weir
would take some action to not have these funds released.
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING NOVEMBER 13 1986 PAGE 11
5.
Mr. Meyer felt the funds are in escrow and time is on the HRA's
side. ke felt by having the plat recorded, it may invite a
confrontation.
Mr. Commers stated this would probably happen anyway sooner or
later.
Mr. Prairie stated this is only the first stage and wondered if
there would be other problems coming up every month.
Mr. Newman stated staff has tried to work with Mr. Weir time and
time again and felt it would be easier to bargain once the $1,000,000
is in hand. He stated he fe1[ reasonably comfortable, under the
terms af the agreement, the funds would be released when the plat,
as presented by the City, is recorded.
Mr. Qureshi stated Woodbridge has committed $6 million to this
project and the HRA has committed less than $2.5 million in addi-
tion to agreeing to install almost $2 million in road improvements
beyond the development. He stated the HRA has the control to
receive the $1,000,000 and if you have a situation where it is going
to become a frustration, the HRA may not want to put anymore money
into the project. He stated a reasonable attempt has been made to
keep the project moving, but wanted to bring to the HRA's attention
some of the staff's concerns.
Mr. Commers polled the HRA members and it was the consensus to
proceed and have the plae recorded. It was suggested that staff
remind Woodbridge, in writing, of their time frames.
Mr. Robertson stated because of subsurface drainage problems that were
not previously known, this change order is requested for installation
of a perforated subsurface drainage pipe system to provide proper
stablization for Lake poin[e Drive.
MOTION BY M2. MEYER, SECONDED BY MS. SCHNABEL, TO ADOPT CHANGE ORDER
N0. 1 FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST 1986-1 & 2, PHASE II, IN THE
AMOUNT OF $17,250 WHICH INCREASES THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE WITH
H& S ASPHALT FROM $368,054.10 TO $385,304.10.
Ms. Schnabel requested a print-out of past change orders in total
dollar am�un[s.
Mr. Pribyl stated a summary was provided of all the contracts and
it shows the change orders, estimates and payments. He stated this
summary wi11 be provided for each and every contract entered into
by the HRA.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, ALL VOTED AYE, AND
CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING NOVEMBER 13 1986 PAGE 12
6.
7
0
Mr. Qureshi stated the State statute provides that tax increment
distric[s must meet ceztain requirements within a three year
period from the date oF its original certification in order to
qualify for the continued payment of tax increment for that district.
He stated the County has requested the City provide information to
substantiate that the three year qualification requirement has been
met and a Letter has been drafted to I�h'. Tilden of the Anoka County
Auditor's Office from Mr. Robertson dated November 7, 1986,
Mr. Commers asked if the improvements made by the City in these
districts would be funded by the HRA.
Mr. Qureshi stated the HRA can make a determination if they want to
fund them or not. He stated the test is it has to be a public
improvement and this has been met. He felt the HRA would have to
make a determination on where the funds from the bonds wouid be used,
as $3.4 million has to be expended in the next two years.
MOTION BY MS. SCHNABEL, SECONDED BY MR. MEYER, TO AUTHORIZE STAFF TO
SEND THE LETTER TO MR. TILDEN DATED NOVEMBER 7, 1986 FROM JOCK
ROBERTSON AND AS SHOWN ON PAGE 6C OF THE A�ENDA,
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOOSLY.
RECETVING PROJECT TIMETABLE FOR BOND IMPROVEMENT INVESTMENTS AND
CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING PRO.TECT IMPROVEMENT EXPENDITURES:
Mr. Qureshi stated the HRA soLd $L1,550,000 in bonds for improvement
projects of which $3.4 million is available and has to be expended
in the next two years. He stated possi6le projects were discussed
at the HRA meeting of May 8, 1986.
The HRA received the memo dated September 19, 1986 from Mr. Qureshi
in regard to a policy for funding different public improvements to
encourage and facilitate development or redevelopment.
CONSIDERATING OF ISSUING A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION TO VANTAGE
Mr. Qureshi stated Vantage Companies has completed the minimum improve-
ments in respect to their development in Fridley and are requesting
reimbvrsement of a portion of the soil correction costs.
Mr. Meyer felt the Letter from Mr, Beckmann dated October 9, 1986
is a tittle vague in regard to the actual soil correction work.
He also felt the report should include lot and block numbers and
details on the work performed.
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AVfHORITY MEETING. NOVEMBER 13, 1986 PAGE 13
Mr. Prairie agreed there should be more detail supplied so it is
on file and everyone knows exactly what was accompiished.
I�h. Newman stated he knows the cost estimate was closer Co $1.6
million and the correction work was extensive. He stated when
the contract was drafted, i[ was intended that more specific details
on the correction be provided.
MOTION BY MR. PRAIRIE, SECONDED BY MS, SCHNABEL, TO REQUEST THE
ENGINEER TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISION OF SECTION 3.3 (a), ii OF THE
CONTRACT AND UPON RECEIPP OF THIS REPORT, TO RELEASE THE $100,000
TO VANTAGE COMPANIES FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF A PORTION OF THE SOIL
CORRECTION COSTS.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECL�IRED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY,
9. PRESENTATION BY WINFIELD DEVELOPMENT, INC. REGARDING PROPOSED DEVELOP-
MENT OF THE SOUTHWEST QUADRANT OF UNIVERSITY AVENUE AND MISSISSIPPI
STREET�
This item was deleted from the ager.da at the request of staff.
10. ESTIMATES:
M(7TION BY MS, SCHNABEL, SECONDED BY M[t, PRAIRIE, TO APPROVE THE
ESTIMATE F6R BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC., INVOICE N0. 37770
DATED OCTOBER 6, 1986 IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,428.61.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
11. CIAIMS:
M(YLION BY I�fli. MEYER, SECONDED BY M5, SCHNABEL, TO APPROVE THE CHECK
REGISTER (CLAIMS N0. 1525-1539) AS PRESENTED,
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
12. OTHER BUSINESS:
A, CONSIDERATION OF AWARD IN THE CASE OF GERALD & NORMA JOHNSON:
Mr. Commers stated the HRA has received a J�[ter dated October 17,
1986 from Ford Crouch, Attorney for Gerald and Norma Johnson, and
they are Willing [o accep[ an award of $71,640.
Mr. Newman stated Mr. Qureshi has suggested approval of this settle-
ment with the Johnson's to resoLve the case without going forward
with an appeal. He stated this $71,640 figure was based on acceptance
HOUSIN� & REDEVELOPMENT AiTTHORITY MEETING NOVEMBER 13 1986 PAGE 14
of the offer by October 22, 1986 and since it is past this date,
there may be some adjustment necessary in this figure.
MOTION BY MS. SCHNABEL, SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRIE, TO APPROVE THE
PAYMENT OF $71,640 IN SETTLEMENT OF THE GERALD At+iD NORMA JOHNSON
CLAIM.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECIARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
B, HRA FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
Mr. Comaiers asked the HRA members to review the financial statement
before the next meeting and that the item be placed on the agenda for
December.
C. I.AKE POINTE CONTRACTS:
Ms. Schnabel asked if the Lake Pointe development would not proceed,
if the HRA has an obligation to [he other contractors.
Mr. Qureshi stated he felt they are committed to [hese contracts, but
hopefully the issues with Woodbridge could be resolved.
ADJOURNMENT :
MOTION BY MIt. MEYER, SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRIE, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING, UPON
A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE NOVEMBER 13,
1986 HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
�
i /
.%' • , _
.
'. �
. _ �y.� � : �
Carole Aaddad
Recording Secretary
�
CALL TO ORDER:
CITY OF FRIDLEY
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION
MEETING
NOVEMBER 18, 1986
Chairperson Svanda called the November 18, 1986, Environmental Quality
Commission meeting to order at 7:40 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Richard Svanda, Maynard Nielson, Bruce Peterson
Members Absent: Dale Thompson, Wayne Wellan
Others Present: Myra Gibson, Planning Assistant
APPROVAL OF SEPTEMBER 16. 1986. ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Nielson, seconded by Mr. Petetson, to approve the September 16,
1986, Environmental Quality Commission minutes as written.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SVANDA DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
1. UPDATE ON CURBSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM
Ms. Gibson distri6uted copies of the tonnage summary covering the last six
months which had been submitted to the Met Council. The City received
$700.80 For recycled materials. This report does not include S.D.R.T.
(the City received no tonnage tickets from Earl Frank) nor from Connie
Metcalf because white office paper is an ineligible material according
to the ifet Council's guidelines.
Ms. Gibson reported that Ms. Connie Metcalf and the League of Women Voters
were doing a telephone survey regarding recycling. P"s. Metcalf will put
together a report of their findings and submit the report to Ms. Gibson.
r1s. Gibson stated she had been recording the number of phone calls received
about missed pick-ups in the curhside program. Thus far, 20 calls have
been received sinc'e'Super Cycle began. r:s. Gibson reported that several
times she could not contact Super L�cle becau;:e they had closed their office
hy 3:00 p.m. Ms. Gibson has talt2ed to Super �,�cle about Ch'.-s dilemma
because they should be able to receive calls iuitil 4:00 p.m.
Mr. Peterson indicated he had heard of a conflict with a Boy Scout troop
regarding newspaper collection. He asked Ms. Gibson for an update.
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMtTISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE 2
Ms. Gt6son stated that she and Mr. Svanda attended Boy Scout Troop 23's meeting,
upon invitation by Mel Stolquist, the troop leader. The controversy between the
Boy Scouts and the City was the Boy Scouts iaking advantage of the CLrbside
Recycling collection programs to generate larger volumes of newspaper for their
paper drives by asking residents or taking newspaper that was left at the curb
for the City's program. Super G�cle was upset because the newspaper is a big
part of their revenue. At the meeting, Ms. Gibson and Mr. Svanda discussed the
reseons for starting the recycling program, and stated that there is enough
newspaper available for both the hauler and the Scouts, and asked that they not
pick up newspaper on Fridays. The Scouts felt this was too restrictive. A compro-
mise was reached where the Scouts could pick up paper in those areas having curb-
side pick up that day after 2:30 p.m, and the hauler would noL pick up paper
tagged for the Scouts.
Ms. Gibson also talked with ,Tim Stillson, the troop leader of the Boy Scout who �
had done the survey. He stated their troop generally collects on Saturday but
had gone out on a Friday, they also will go out after 2:30 p.m.
2. UPDATE ON S.O.R.T. DROP-OFF REG1'CLING CENTEF
Ms. Gibson stated that the lease agreement had been signed and that the construc=
[ion for the building had begun. Work is also being done on the fence. 9ope-
fully, S.O.R.T. will re-open the first week in December. Universal Can will acc2pt
plastic bottles, al�inum cans, bimetal 6everage cans, aluminum foil, and scrap
aluminum (for which they will pay); and newspaper, glass, cardboard, and soup cans
(for which they will not pay}. Glass need only be rinsed. Operating hours will
be 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m., Tuesday through Saturday.
The compost site will be opened in the spring.
3. UPDATE ON THE MET COUNCIL GRAt7T AND IAAN PROGRAtS
Mr. Svanda indicated that Columbia Heights was getting an incentive grant for
a curbside program.
P1s. Gibson stated that Columbia Reights has a drop-off site in operation, and
they have received some funds from the abatement programs. When recycling
becomes mandatory, the idea of covering some of the cost through a charge on the
water bill has been discussed.
Pis. Gibson distributed copies of the November 17, 1986, memo outlining Metropolitan
landfill Abatement I�linds, and gave a summary of the Planning Assistance Grants,
Research and Developmettt Grants, and Solid Y7aste AbatBment Participation Loan
Program. Ms. Gibson did not feel that these funds would apply tb Fridley's needs
and felt they required much work for little return.
Ms. Gibson st2ted 5he would contact Glynnis Jones at the Met Council to discuss
FYidley's programs and see what is available through their grants and loans.
Mr. Svanda suggested talking in terms of what programs now exist and how to
best optimize these programs.
e
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE 3
4
Ms. Gibson thought another program was coming up that appeared to be more
fitting to Fridley's needs. Ms. Gibson stated she is also looking at
continued development of the current programs.
Mr. Svanda wondered if there will be a problem getting people to again use
S.O.R.T. after it has been closed and if people would participate in both
programs.
Ms. Gibson stated that people continue to show an interest in S.O.R.T. and
that people continue to drop off recycleables at the site. She did not
thinlc there would be a problem.
Ms. Gibson stated that the Department
of grant fundino for leftover monies.
requests, Yt could include recycling.
sources for site improvements.
of Energy will be having another round
It is feasible that along with energy
This would leave the funds from other
Mr. Svanda suggested including expenses incurred for composting.
OTHER BUSINE55
a. Ms. Gibson indicated that the Energy Commission had discussed household
radon contamination and working with the EQC. The Energy Commission
felt they could make people aware of radon contamination which is now
more of a concern with the weather tight homes. Ms. Gibson stated she
had sent for information on the subject.
Mr. Svanda stated the Environmental Protection Agency will be looking
into radon contamination, and expressed interest in working with the
Energy Commission.
b. Ms. Gibson distributed copies of the tentative 1987 meeting dates.
MOTION by Mr. Peterson, seconded by Mr. Nielson, to approve the
tentative meeting dates for the Environmental Quality Commission for
1987.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SVANDA DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
c. Ms. Gibson announced that Mr. Peterson had submitted his resignation
from the EQC. He has been a member of the commission since December,
1975. Mr. Peterson will be moving to Hlaine in the near future. Ms.
Gibson and the commission members thanked Mr. Peterson for his years
of service and for his many contributions to the £nvironmental Quality
Commission.
d. Ms. Gibson stated she would proceed to advertise the vacancy on the
commission.
�
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE 4
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Mr. Peterson, seconded by Mr. Nielson, to adjourn the meeting.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SVANDA DECLARED THE NOVEMBER 18,
1986, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8: 17 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
��
Lavonn Cooper �^
Recording Secretary ��
�
CITY OF FRIDLEY
APPEALS COMMISSIOFI h1EETIPIG, WOVEh16ER 25, 1986
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Betzold called the Nov. 25, 1986, Appeals Coexnission meetin� to
order at 7:35 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Menbers Present: Donald Qetzold, Alex Barna, Diane Savage
Menbers Absent: Jerry ShereY.
Ottiers Present: Darrel Clark, City of Fridley
Linda Fisher, 1500 Northviestern Financial Center
Ken 6elgarde, 7841 4layzata Rlvd.
Eugene Hagberg, 5881 - 2nd St. N.E.
David Koski, 6arton-Aschman Assoc.
Jim Robinson, Plannin9 Coordinator
APPROVAL OF OCT06ER 28, 1986, APPEALS COtiP1ISSI0N MINUTES:
MOTION BY MS. SAVAGE, SECONDF.D BY hfR, BRRNA� TO APPROVE TAE OCT, 28� 29R6,
AFPEAIS COMMZSSION MINUTES AS FIP.ITTEC7.
UPOID A VDICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYF.� CHAZRPERSON BETZOLD DECLRRF,P THF. MOTION
CARRIED UNRNIPIOUSLY.
APPROVAL OF APPEALS CQ�it1I5SI0N 19II7 TEP�TATIVE t1EETIPlG DATFS:
MCYI'ION BY �IR. BARNA� SECONDED BY MS. SAVAGE� TO APPROVE THE I987 APPF.ALS
COMMZSSION MF,ETING DRTES AS SUBMITTED BY STAFF.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAZP,PF,P�SOII BE^_'ZOLI7 DF,CLARF.D THF, MOTTON
CAF2RZED UNANIPfOUSLY.
1. COtISIDERATIOPJ OF A VARIA��CE REQUE57, VAR #F36-31 , BY EUGEP7F A�ID JEAN HRGBF(;G
MO_'IOL1 BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED AY 715. SAL+AGE, ^O OPEN THE P[?BLIC HF,RRIlIG.
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VDSZt7G AYE, CHAZRPERSON BF.TZOLD DECLARF,D THR
PUALIC HFAR217G OPEN RS 7:38 P.Pf.
APPEAI.S COI4�IISSIOt� t1FETIfIG, tJOVE�4BER 25 1986 PAG[ 2
Chairperson Betzold read the Administrative Staff Report:
AD�1ItlISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT
5881 - 2nd Street PJ.E.
VAR #86-31
A. PU[3LIC PURPOSE SERVED 6Y P.FQUIRQtENT:
G
C
Section 205.21.5, D, 3h requires that an attached or CIP.tdCI1PCI accessory
building which opens onto the side street shall be set back at least
25 feet.
Puhlic purpose served by this requirer�ent is to allov� for off-street
parking without encroaching on the puhlic right-of-w.ay and also the
aesthetic consideration of the neighborf�ood to reduce the building
"line of sight" encroachment into the neiqhhor's front yard.
STATFD HARDSHIP:
"The h�rdsliip is the size of the lot."
ADPtIf�ISTRATIVE STAFF REVIE41:
This corner lot is 42 feet wide. It has a small house on it without a
baser��ent. The only storage space they have is a small �atility shed.
The property is zoned S-1 (Hyde Park). The lot once had a garage
located in about the same area ti�here they would like to build the new
one.
If the Appeais Comnission approves this request, the. staff arould
recormiend that the driveway be hard surfaced and that all the outsir+e
stnrage be placed inside the new structure foilowing its completion.
Also,because the lot is in the S-1 district, we will pass your
decision on to the City Council for further consicleration,
tAr. Clark stated this property was located on the corner of 59th Ave. and
2 1/2 St. The proposed garage would be 22 ft. in depth, a little wider than
a normal garage, but the petitioner needs as r�uch space as possible for storage
because they have a small house witM no baser�ent.
The garage would be located 3 ft. off the back property line and approx.
17'-2 ft, off the north property Tine. 7here is a 75 ft. houlevard hetvre?n
the curb and the property line so there would be 30+ feet fron the curb itself
so there would Ce plenty of room to park a vehicle in the driveway aaithout
encroaching on the street. He stated there was a naraqe in
this sane location, but it blew away in 1965 and was never rebuilt.
Mr. Clark stated this vras in Hyde Park zoning which states that any use that
exists now can remain as such. Even if it is destroyed, it can be rebuilt
on the lot at the same setbacks. It also states that if you add onto the
house, you must meet p�cesent normai R-1 setbacks. Beina that this lot is
only 42 ft. wide, there was no way the petitioner could huild a garage that
faces 59th Ave. �iith a 25 ft, setback.
APPEALS C011P1IS5I(�Pf f1ELTI�IG, NOVE�IE3ER 25, 1986 PAGE 3
Mr. Clark stated Staff was recormendinq a stipulation tfiat a fiardsurfaced
driveway be put in, and he believed the petitioner had agreed to that.
He stated the petitioner has a lot of outside storage now, and hopefully,
this garage would solve that problem.
Mr. Clark stated he had discussed this request with h1r. Jock Robertson,
Conmunity Development Director, and they agreed that this variance rquest
should go to City Council so the Council mas avtare of this action, Fven if
the Appeals Comnission approves the variance request and there is no neighhor-
hood objection, they feel the City Council shnuld he notified, This was t,he
first variance the Appeals Commission or the City Council has had fror! the
Hyde Park area.
Mr. Eugene Nagberq stated that, as F1r. Clark had stated, everything that is
presently outside will be stored inside the new garage.
MOTION BY MS. SADAGE� SECONDED BY MR. BRP.NA, TO CLOSE THE PlIBLIC HF,ARING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING RYE, CHRZRPERSON BETZOLD DECLAP.ED THE PUBLIC'
HT•.ARING CIASED AT 7:50 P,A1.
hlr. Barna stated that ��ith the small size of this house on a slah ��ith no "
basement and no �arage on a 47. ft. lot, he could sympathize 4�ith the petitinner.
The 17'-� ft. off the lot line left plenty of roor� to park in the driveviay an�'
cause no visibility prohlems to the street. He would be in favor of grantin�
the variance.
Ms. Savage stated she agreed. This was a very small house and there was
obviously a need for a garage for storage space. She would be in favor of
granting the variance.
�1r. Betzold stated he was in agreement with v�hat had been said by hoth
P1r. Barna and P1s. Sava9e.
MOSZON BY h1R. BRRl7A, SECONDED BY b1S. SAVAGF„ PO APPROVF. VAF2IAP7CE REnIIEST,
VAR #86-31, BY EUGENE AND JEAN NAGBERG� PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205.22.5� P, 3h,
OF THE FRIDLF,Y CITY CODE (S-IJ ZOf7IP1G, TO RF.➢i7CF _THfi SIDE YARD SETBACY ON
THF. STREET SIDE OF A COP,NER 7AT FROM 25 FEET TO 17.5 FEET TO ALLOG7 SHF.
CDIJSSRUC'I'ION OF A DESACHED RCCESSORY BUILDING ON IAT 30, BLOCK 23, HYDE PAP,X.
ADDITION, THE SAFfE BEING 588Z - 2ND STRF.ET N.E., FRZDLEY, F12NNE50_"R� WZTH
THF, FOLLOWSNC, STSPULATIOl7S:
1. THE DRIVEWAY BE XRRDSURFACED,
2. ALL OUSSIDE STORAGE �'O BE PLACED INSZDF, THE NF,W STRUCTURl
FOLIAWING ITS COMPLETZON,
THIS VARIANCE REO,UEST TO F.E SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR INFORMATIOC.'AL PI��PpSES,
UPON A VOICE VDSE, RLL VOTZNG AYF„ CHAIRPEASOfI BETZOLD DECLARED THF. MOTSOf]
CARRIED I7NANIMOUSLY.
APPEALS C0�'UtI5SI0Pl MEETINf,, NOVEh16ER 25 1986 PAGE 4
2. CONSIDERATION OF A V1IRIAPICF REQU[ST, VAR #86-32, RY UNIV
MOPION BY f15. SAVAGE, SECONDED BY MR. BARNA, TO OPE17 THF. Pi7BLIC IIEARING.
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRPERSON BF.TZOLD DECI.AP.rD _TNE PUBLIC
NEIlRIL7G OPEN RT 7:54 P.M,
Chairperson Betzold read the Administrative Staff Report:
ADPIINISTRATIVE STAFF RFP(1RT
South of 85th, 4lest of llniversity Avenue
and P�orth of II3rd Avenue
YAR �86-32
A. PUE3LIC PURPOSE 5[RVED 6Y REQUIRE�IENT:
Section 205.03.53 requires that a parking stall be a ten (10) foot wide
by twenty (20) foot long area to store one (1) automobile, which has
access to a public street or alley and permits ingress an�i egrPSS of an
automobile. Where a parking stall abuts a curb or sic!eHialk, the lenqth
may be reduced to ei9hteen (TS) feet.
Puhlic purpose served by this requirement is to provide adequate room
between large vehicles.
B. STATED NARDSNIP:
"lle feel that this site is unique in that we have been aske�l an� have
agreed to easer�ents and setbacks on all four sides. In addition, we have
some existinq wetlands that fall under the jurisdiction of the Army Corp
of Engineers that account for an additional 2.23 acres.
"We �rould like to �rovide as r�uch space as possih]e for amenities, and
in order to meet the 10 foot parking stall width, we would have tn
sacrifice some of it for additional parkinq lots. We wi71 verba7ly
expand on ttiese and other issues at the meeting."
C. ADHIPJISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEtI:
This property is a 21-acre site lying adjacent to and east nf Spring-
brook fJature Center and north of 83rd Avenue. The property is zoneci
M-2 (heavy industrial) and is in the process of being zoned to R-3
(general mu7tiple dwelling) for the development of a 358-unit apartment
complex. The City has as{:ed them to dedicate certain easements an�+
establish setbacks on al7 four sides:
APPEALS COPiMISS10N NEETIt�G, �JOVEMBER 25 1986 PAGF 5
1. 33-foot street dedication, plus a 7-foot walkway and a 20-foot
setback of the south side (83rd Avenue)
2. 33-foot easement with no setback of the west side adjacent to
Springbrook Nature Center
3. 60-foot easement with a 10-foot setback of the north side
4. 20-foot easement plus an 8-foot setback of the easP side.
The petitioner must alsn establish two ponds with draina9e swales.
If the Appeals Caronission recortmends approval, the Staff has ne
additional stipulations to suggest.
Nr. Clark stated that, as mentione�l in the Staff report, thPre vrere easements
on all four sides of the property, and on the southern one-third of thA
property there was an area that �ias un�ier the definition of tiletlands. The
petitioner rras riealin� witf� the Army Corps of Engineers viith this portion of
the property to see what had to be done. That, together with the easements
and setbacks, was what pror�pted the petitioner to request this parkinq width
variance from 10 ft. to 9 ft. As seen on the plot plan, the narages and parl�.ing
were mostly alon9 the perimeter. If they have to go to 10 ft, stalls, soMP
parking would have to go into the interior of the proiect in order to obtain
additional parking. This would encroach on the green space anri ar�enities such
as orall:inq p�ths, tennis courts, quiet areas, etc.
�1r. Clarl: stated the plat and the rezoning has heen before the Planning
Cortimission. The City Council field a public hearing and i± �!ill be reconsidered
at City Council on Dec. 3. The recoea�endation fror� the Appeals Coefiission on
this variance, along ��ith the plat and the rezoninn, will be considered hy the
City Council on Dec. 3.
"tr. Rohinson stated Staff has worked closely with the developer to cor�e up with
a very nice, high quality plan to maximize the site that is adjacent to th?
Springhrook tdature Center, maxinize the vie��, anr! make as r�iuch green area as
possible. kJhen Staff discovered the project included 9 ft. stalls, they pointed
it out to the petitioner in order to follo�� the variance process.
Pir. Rohinson stated City Staff feels this is a unique situation that differs
from some of the other variance requests for 9 ft. parl;in� stalls hecausa there
are easer:ients requested on all four sides of the property. One easement that
was particularly unique was the one on the west side of the pronerty adjacent
to Springbrook �Jature Center. This �-ras an existing street and utility easemen±
which the Gity has requested be maintained but not used for the de�ielopm?nt but
rather as a berm and landscape buffer between the develnment and the f�atur?
Center. A significant amount of property has been granted to the Ci±v in
terms of easements.
APPEALS CO�VIIS5I011 11EETIFJG FJOVEf16EP, 25 1986 PA�F 6
hfr: Rohinson stated he felt the easements along with the wetlands requirement
could be considered the hardship for the variance from 10 ft. to 9 ft, stalls.
Also, this was the first residential property requesting 9 ft. stalls, f1nP
of the key points the City Council made when they decided not to change the
code to 9 ft. stalls was they felt comnercial husinesses and industrial
properties should maintain 10 ft. stalls because the Council felt it was a
safer and more comfortahle size stall for the City of fridTey. Since this
request was for residential property, he did �ot tliink that applied as m�ach.
Ms. FishPr stated she had prepared a supp]ement to the Staff report dated
P�ov. 25, 193f. In their agenda, the Comnissioners had received a memo froM
Oavid Koski of 6arton-Aschman Associates regardin9 the proposed 9 ft. a�ide
parking stalls.
MOTION BY MP.. BARNA� SECONDED BY MS. SAVAG£.� TO RF,CEIi'E II7T0 THF, RECORD TYF
NOV. 25, 1986, MEMO FF.OM I,INDR FISHER.
UPON A VOICF VOTF, ALL VOTING AYF.� CHAIRPF.RSOP7 BF.T20LP DF,CLA?£D TFIF, MO:"SOP1
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
f1s. Fisher stated the site itself and its designation in the Conprehensive
Plan and the background material vias unique in the sensitivity that has been
brouqht to light in the deveTopnent of tF�e site. It v�as adjacent to the
Springbrook Nature Center. From the beginning,tha Staff has
spent a considerable amount of time on the buffering and landscape plan 4rith
the Nature Center. That has affected the development and ability to provide
the open spaces anA amenities the City has wanted.
"9s. Fisher stated the site was designated a redevelopment district in ttie
City's Land Use Plan and the flousinq Plan has identified a need for adciitional
multi-family housing prior to 1990 in this area and has recognized this site as
a possible suitable site. She stated the Comprehensive Plan aTso encourages
petitions for residential rezoning of industrial and cormercial properties
adjacent to park land as a means of facilitating development of alternative
housing types in the community.
Ms. Fisher stateci they have submitted an application for rezoninn and a
preliminary plat for approval. The Planning Commission reviewed the project
at their Oct. Z2 meeting and unanimously recommended approval. She felt r�os.*.
of the comments made hy the Planning Commissioners were pnsitive.
Ms. Fisher stated they have worked very closely v�ith Sprinnbrook rdature Center.
They had a neighborhood meeting with then, and the Sprin9hrook Nature Cen*er
Foundation adopted a motion basically recormending approval of the project rri±h
tfie various components that were being coordinated wit.h them.
F1s. Fisher stated tfiis was a multi-family project aiith 358 units in nine
6uildings with garage and surface parking. The apartments v+ere designed for
fanilies: 67% - two hedroor�; 17% - one bedroom; and 15� - three bedroon.
�
APPEALS C011P1ISSION PIEETINf, NOUEt10ER 25, 1986 PIIGF 7
P1s. Fisher stated tiiat from the beginning, the City indicated it wanted a high
quality, high amenity project. That meant certain thinqs on the interior
that she would not go over at this time, but it also meant distinctive exterior
outside amenities and complex courtyards. It was very important to them to
maintain a large enough interior courtyard and open space to provide amenities.
Ms. Fislier stated she would like to speak directly to the practical difficulties
and particular hardships tl�at they think warrant the harAship from city ordin�nce.
They are providing 9arage and surface parkinq for a total number of 72Q parking
spaces. That consists of 460 - 9 ft. wide surface spaces, 22 12 ft. handicapped
spaces, and 247 garage spaces (both regular garage and recreation vehicle (R�i)
garage).
"1s. Fisher stated the public purpose served by the 10 ft. stall requirement was
"to provide adequate room beto�een large vehicles". The reason they askeri
Barton-RsChman to submit a memo was not 6ecause they riere proposina any code
cfianges, but to 6asically address the public purpose question. She thou9ht
Mr. Koski's mer�o was self-explanatory. He basically indicated that frnr� a
functional standpoint, if the Appeals Conmission and the f,ity Council were to
approve the variance for 9 ft. stalls, there rlould still be adequate s¢ace for
turning and maneuverinq. As stated in ?1r. Koski's report: "..it is apparent
that traffic circulation and parl;ing operations tiaill function smoothly utilizing
nine foot atiAe parking stal]s with the drive aisles as indicated on the
schematic plan. The current schematic plan provides adeq�iate site distances
for circulation and drive aisles to al1o�•: maneuverina for perpendicular parb.ing
anci two-way traffic. The uine foot �•�ide parl�in� stalls provide adequate roon
for parkinn and maneuvering all passenger automobiles and vehicles that r�ay be
expected to use it."
(1s. Fishr.r stated that Ptr. Robinson had indicated that a distinction coul�i ba
drawn het��een long term residential parking facilities where residents are
basically familiar with circulation and the traffic configuration and the short
term parking in industrial and commercial facilities.
Ms. Fisher stated that regardin9 the specific hardship, in addition to some of
the unique items already discussed, possibly the most significant i±em she
talked a6out on page �4 of her t�ov. 25th memo involved the 2.23 acres of wetlands,
basically on the southern fringe of the site. Since the Planning f,ormission
meeting, they have prepared an Fnvironmental Assessment l�lorksheet (FA�;I), ?he
Corps of Engineers has determined that 6ecause of a particular special regional
condition tfiat the developer will need an individual permi*. from the Corps.
This was very ir�portant and very unique, a characteristic of the site th�t
distinguishes it from other properties within the City. As part of that permit
process, they have proposed to alter by filling all the wetlands on site, but
to compensate for that by creatin� the two on-site ponds and the pond on thP
park site. To date, ti�at has not proved acceptable to the Corps and they are
working with the f,orps on a�aet,lands preservation plan that might require the
renoval or relocation of a row of parking. She could not be more specific ri�ht
no�r as they are negotiating with the Corps, but it had become very important
for them to have flexihility in terms of 9 ft, parkinn stalls because they are
in excess of ordinance requirements. They calculate the need as 712 or 716
spaces as required by City Code, and they noar shnai 729 parking stalls. If as
APPEALS COt1t1I5SI0�J MEETINf, NOVEMf3ER 25, 1986 PAGE 8
a last resort to 9et the permit, they have to remove scxne of the parkinn spaces
on the south, it rnight be very important to have the 9 ft. stalls.
Ms. Fisher stateci tfiat, in addition, she felt there had been a very clear
description given of the easements which means they have to be somewh�t
extraordinary on all four sides of the property.
Pfs. Fisher stated they have calculated that if they kept the sar�e nur�her of
units which meet all otf�er setbacl:s and requirerients, and if the existing
blacktop �ias restriped to accommodate 10 ft. wide stalls without converting
existing interior into blacktop, they would have plus or minus 69� parking
spaces nn site. So, without eating up open space, they would be under code
if they lient to 10 ft. wide sta7ls. If they are required to meet code, they
will be vating up sone open space, and they think that would adversely affect
their ability to negotiate with the Corps of Engineers.
h1r. Betzold stated the only comparable situation he coulri think nf in Fridley
was thP 6eorgetoam Apartment complex Yrhere there was a high density of pennTe
living in a cor�pacted area. Once winter comes, of course, snow covers all the
striping and people park wherever they want any��ay; but NrhPn they are lookina
at something like this, they do not want to make a difficult parkin� situation
any o-iorse. fie asked if there was a way to have both v�orlds--9 ft. stalls
designated for compact car parl:ing and 10 ft. stalls for larger cars, trucks,
vans, etc.?
'1r. Qelgarde stated he would not want to try to manage enforcing certain
vehtcles to �ark in certain spaces. He stated he had a lot of cocimercia7
experience and apartment experience, and he v�as not aware of any complaints
rP9arding 9 ft. stalls.
Mr. Dave Y.oski stated they have found that 9 ft. wide parkinq stalls are ade-
quate for almost any vehicle on the road, excent possibly an RU. !�e stated
they design 9 ft. or less parking stalls for all cormiercial facilities no�•!,
except for the 72 ft, wide handicapped stalls. They have had no cor�plaints.
There viere ohviously more RV's on the road, hut there were more comoact cars
than anything else. He thought the mix between the cor�pact and the fewer P,U's
create �lenty of width in parl:ing situations so thPV have never experienced
any problems or difficulties. He stated Qarton-Aschman has a nation-wide firm
and was designing parking a11 over the country. Not anywhere, except v�here
there is a particular need, do they design anything larger tlian a� ft, stall.
Mr. Koski stated that re9arding fir. Betzold's question, even with a mix of
9 ft. and 10 ft. stalls, it would still eat up open space.
Mr. Barna stated that with 10 ft, wide stalls, they would have 690 stalls
which was approximately 2(1-25% short of code. They are aiming for 729 stalls
with 9 ft. widths wfiich was approximately 15� above code. If out of thP 46f1
9 ft. stalls, 20-25% were 9 ft. stalls and the rest 10 ft., they woul�i s+.ill
have more than 712 st.alls which would meet code.
Mr. Koski stated that if they wanted the mix of compact stal7s and 70 ft. sta7ls,
they might want to make. the canpar.t stalls truly compact hy makinq them 8 ft.
i
APPEALS COIiPtISSIO�! MEETI!�G tJ0VEP1E3ER 25 19II6 PAGE 9
That would work bet±er. The problen he SdY1 YldS that people in an apartment
cor�plex are going to parY, as close as possible to their apartment anyway.
Mr. Robinson stated he did not think the distinction between 9 ft. and 10 ft.
s±alls was very desirable. They would have to actually siqn the 10 f±, stalls
and he did not thinl: it would achieve the desired effect the Coc�missioners
intended.
F1r. Clark stated all the gara9es arere 1Q ft. right novr. So, out of 729 oar�.inq
spaces, there were 247 aarage spaces.
Mr. Betzold stated he atas more than philosophically opposed to goinn �iith
9 ft, stalls. The City Council has looked at the issue on several different
occasions and has decided to stay vrith the 10 ft. stall requirement. Novrever,
he was sympathetic to this project aiith a11 the easements and unique situations,
and it did seem to he a c]ass developrient.
Pir. Getzold stated it had been pointed ou� tha± there were sor�e garages that.
were speficially desi9neted for RU parl:ing. lJas there any requirement by
ei*_her the develoner or the City to require that anyone v!ho has an RU has to
park in the garage as opposed to parl;inn the P,1� in a regular stall?
'1r. Clarl: stated there olas no requirement for that, Ile stated that if all
the stalls were 9 ft. excep± for the RU 9arac�es, he ±houc�ht i± woulci be diffi-
cult to park an RV in a 9 ft. stall. �laybe there could be sone parl:ing spaces,
11 ft. or so, located a± different points throunhout the complex that wnuld
accommodate RU's for those people v+ho could not afford to rent an RV gara9e.
These spaces could be signed "RV's only". This ��rould prevent soraeone from
tal:ing up a stall and a haif with an RU, and the management could police it
on a complaint basis.
!ts. Fisher stated that seemed to her an easier way to handle the situation than
a r�ix ef 9 ft. and 10 ft. stalls.
'1r. Belgarde stated this �•ras the first tir�e any of his developMents has even
had RV garages. It rias sor�ething they were tryinq for the first time.
Mr. Betzold stated having desi9nated RV parkina could also accormiodate boats.
He thought having a boat or a large RV parked in front of an apartmen*.. huildin�
would detract fror� the type of develo�ent the developer vras trying to accomplish.
Mr. Barna stated 99.9� of the people do not measure hoa� far off they are in a
stall anyo-�ay. He statecl it did not really nake much difference to hir�vihether
it was a 9 ft. or 10 ft, stall. If tfiey decide *_o go along with � ft., they
mi9ht as well qo along with 9 ft. throughout the project, except for the aarages,
Once the snow was on the nround, there would be no r�ore desi9nated parking
anyway.
!10_TION BY FiR. BRP^IA, SF.COP/DED BY MS. SAVRGE� TO CIASF, mHF, PUBIIC HEAP,IP7G.
UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARi:D THE PUBLIC
HEARING CLOSED RT 8:55 P.M.
APPEALS COMMISSION t1EETIIJG NOVEPIBER 25, 1986 PI1fF 10
Mr. Barna stated that rather than see any more land under blacktop, he would
go along with the variance fror� 10 ft. to 9 ft. parking stalls. He would
rather see apartment buildings on this site than warehouses or storage garages,
and this did seem to be a classy, high quality apartment complex. He would
be comfortable with the plan as it was proposed with 9 ft, stalls, alon9 with
the garage spaces and RV garage spaces.
t4s. Sava�le stated she agreed. She was very impressed with the plan. She felt
it would be a real asset to Frid7ey. She was especially impressed with the
landscapinci and the green area; and, in her mi�d, the aesthetics was the
most ir�portant thing. She �vas in favor of granting the variance requPS*,.
Personally, she did no± have a problem with 9 ft. stalls as she parks in a
parking ramp where 9 ft. stalls are the "norm". She also felt the hardship
had been well articulated by the petitioner.
11r, Betzo7d stated he was sure that if the developer did not have all the
easements on all four sides of the property, he vrould have been happy tn
adfiere to the code and have 10 ft. stalls. And, there was also the problem
with the �aetlands. He still had a problem with 9 ft. stalls in qeneral,
especially since the City Council has chosen to leave the code at 10 ft. He
did want to discourage as many 9 ft, variance requests as passihie. He would
ask the developer to give some consideration to lookincl at havincl a few desig-
nated spaces for the larger vehicles, maybe in the outiyinn areas, and be
ab7e to address this at the City Council meeting o� Dec. 8.
MOTION BY HP,. BARNR� SECONDED BY MS, SAPAGE� TO Rf;COPfMEND TO CITY COUNCIL
APPROVRL OF VARIANCE REQUEST� VAR 1�86-32� BY UI�TIVF.RSITY AVENUF. ASSOCIRSES,
PURSUNIT TO CNAPTER 205.03,53 OF TXE FRIDLEY CZ'"Y COPE TO REDUCE THF, P,F.QUIRED
PARKINC. STALL WTDTH FROM 10 FEET _TO 9 FEET TO ZPICREASE TNE NUMBER OF PAP,KIITC,
STALLS, GEPIERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF B�STX AVENUE� 67ESP OF UNIVERSITY AVENUF.,
AND NORTH OF 83RD AVENUE� FRZDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432.
UPON A I�OICE VOTE� RLL VOT£NG AYE� CHASRPERSOP? BETZOLD DECLARED THF, MOTIOP'
CARRIEP UNANZMOUSLY.
lIDJ0URP1�IENT :
MO:'ZON BY MS. SAVAGE� SECORDED BY 11R, BARl7A� TO ADJDUP.l7 THE 11EET�TrG. C7POC7 A
VOICE VpTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRPERSON BF,TZOLD DECLARED _THE NOV. 25, I9R6,
APPEALS COMPfZSSZON MEETIP7G ADJOURf7ED RT 9:15 P;M.
Respectfully submitted,
yn Sa a
Recording Secretary
:
_
G7Y OF
FRiDLEY
CIVICCENTER • 643i UNIVBRSITYAVE.N.E. FRIDLEY.MINNESOTA 55432 • PHONE(612)ST1-3450
Dear Resident:
FROI�t THE OFFICE OF
COONCILMAN DENNIS SCHNEIDER
RES. TELEPHONE: 571^7059
A lot has happened in tiie Fast few weeks ooncerning the Church on the Move
proFosal. In addition, there is a seFarate proposal, rot o�nnected with the
�ur�, for developnent in your imnediate neic�borhood. 7he purpose of this
letter is to give you an update on what is happeaing- and what yon might
expect in the near futura
�urch on the Move
On We�esdayr Nov�ber 19. 1986 7btino Grace Hic� School denied the Qiurch on
the Move's request for use of Grace's Fxirking lot lhis action, in effect,
nenies the Special Use F�rmit the Church was seeking.
Some tackgro�md infotmation may be helFful:
As you know, the Q�urch on the Move is purchasing the Gardena sd�ool property
frcm faith Acadany. Q�urch on the Move is presently operating the facility
as a school. Tney would like to hold church services at the school on
Sundays, A Special Use �rmit is required to ensure that this use of the
pcoperty does not haian health. safety or public welfare.
�is Special Use F�cmit zequest has been before t]�e Planning Commission and
the City Council for nearly 3 months. I have received many calls from
wncecned citizens. Many have op�osed the use of the school for a d�ur� due
to traffic, parking, and noise considerations. Many others have voiced
support, indicating that a diucch is a good neight�oz, and expressing concern
for what mic�t happen to the property if District 14 had to find a new tenant
oc a developer.
I asked our city staff to investic,gte nunerous issues. Zhe� aralyzed traff ic
oota�ts on Garciena, they developed a very specific proFnsed agresnent for use
of the recreational propezty and equipnent on the school's pcoperty. they
analyzed the Farking ratios of Qiurch on the Move's proposal and parking for
all of the other d�urches in Fridley.
Hased on tiiis investigation, as well as public input fran the hearings before
the Planning CoarQnission and City Coimcil, fifteen stipulations were added to
the Special Use Permit request. Several of the stipulations required that
the Q�urcYi on the Move have a sic�ed and reoorded agreement with Grace for
use c� Grace's Farking lot Other stipulations required further hearings
before the City Council for any expansion, g3ving, or other use of the
buil ding. And one stipulation required the entire issue be reviewed by the
City Cotncil six months aftez gzanting the Special Use Permit (in effect a
probationary periai)
RBSIDffidCE: 6190 STINSON BOQLSVARD N.E., FRIDLSY� MINNESOTA 55432
.�
-F8ge2-
With these stipulatioiis in plaae, a� with a belief that Grace High School
would grant Church on the Move a parking easement, I voted to grant the
Special Use F�zmit, with the stipulations.
Denial of a Special Use F�rmit requires that the CYty make a finding that the
profosed use would be haimful to pu6lic safety, health or welfare. Q early,
without parking, this test would be me� But the case for denial vanished
with the parking eas�nent
My assessnent of the situation was that groimds for denial did not exist. If
the City denied the I�rmit, and was then forced to issue it by the courts,
our ability to add the stipulations would be severely limited. My thought
was to put as many controls on the use of the properyt as was possible-
thereby ensuring that if prohlens developed we (the City) vx�uld have a way of
dealing with them. This was the intent of the six month review.
Additiona].ly any future expansion plans for the �urdi would oome under City
Coimcil and public scrutiny.
Since Grace ciid not grant the Ferking, this is naw a moot point. �e Special
Use F�xmit will not be granted without the Farking. However, I did want you
to unc3erstand my thinking on this matter.
What should we expect rext. ..
At the next City Council meeting, I will reopen the Special Use Permit
question, and mwe to deny the I�nnit based on the lack of paiking.
I would anticipate that the gurch on the Move will either develop another
packing proFosal, oz come to ti�e City with plans for construction of their
own g3rking loti Either of these would require another special use permit,
ana new hearings before the Planning Co�mission and the City Council. 4his
will prot�hly occur in early and late January.
You will be informed if and when this happens; we'll then zeview the
specif ics of any such plans and take appropriate actions.
Single Family DeveloFment Pzoposal
�e City reoently reoeived a proFnsal from Continental Developnent Corp. ,
�arles Cook, President, for the platting of seven lots for single family
develognent irtmediately to the north of Faith Acade�ny school. �e developer
has aoguired (or has an option to acquirej rear yard property fcom two
residents on Hillcrest Drive. 9�is property, along with the existing vacant
property north of the school results in a 3 1/4 acre Faroel
4he prbposed plat is for seven lots. All of the lots meet City Codes
relative to area and frontage. Access to the lots if from a proposeci
extension of 60th Avenue, forming a cul�le-sac.
�e developer indicated that hanes in the plat would be in the $150,000 and
up ca tegory. �e lots are large, and he indica ted he would preserve as manv
tcees as possihle during the developnent.
�e plat was presented at a pu4lic hearing before the Planning Cannission on
We�esday, Novenber 19, 1986. Planning Comnission tahled action, pending a
moce detailed dcainage plan fr� �e developei.
RESIDffiiCE: 6190 STINSON BOQLEVl�RD N.E., PRIDLEY, MINNPSOTA 55432
-I�ge3-
�e key issue identified at Planning Commission was storm watec drainage.
7he prop�sed glat is on a very steep incline, and drainage oonsiderations are
extrenely importan� Our staff is not yet satisf ied with the developez's
proposa:l on haw he intends to hancile storm water.
Zhe glat, with a mare detailed drainage plan, as well as other information,
will oane taack to the Planning Commission on December 10, 1986. It will
likely go to the City Coimcil sanetime in January.
I will attenpt to keep you infoaned as this proposal progresses.
�ank you for taking the time to read this long letter. I hope it has been
help�ul. If you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to
call me. My nunber is 571-7059.
Sincerely,
��am✓2 _ �' / ��ie.cc�/i�
Dennis L. Sch�r
Co�mcilman, Ward 2
RBSIDffiiCE: 6190 STINSON BOIILEVARD N.E.� FRIDLEY, MINNPSOTA 55432
..
..