The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 06/24/1987 - 6917A�ANNING �N1NffSSION FEETING City of FLidle1r A G E N D A WF�]FSIYIY, JI7I� 24, 1987 7:30 P.M. Location: Co�mcil Chanber (upper level) cAT•r, TO ORDER• ROLL CAI.L: APV�WE PLAnTyTNC apA'fNLSSION MINUPES• JUNE 3 1987 PnurTr z�aRSNG• CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT P S #87-06 SHOREY.'OOD PLAZA BY ST ANTHONY VSLLAGE SF30PPING CENPER. INC .: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Generally located south c� West Nbore Lake Drive, east of Highway 65, north of Moore Lake and west of Centcal Avenue. 1he full legal description is on file with the City Clerk and is available to the public and will be iurnished at the Planning Commission meeting). atrRr T� r�.nRING• CONSIDF.NATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT � SP #87-�3 BY BRfJDY ASSOCIATES INC• . . . . F�r Section 205.24.4, B, 2 of the Fridley City Code, to allaa the grading and construction of a parking lot in the CRP--1 Floodwa�, generally located south of West Moore Lake Drive, east c� Highwa� 65, north of Moore Lake and west of Gentral Avenue. A map describing the atea is on file with the City C1erk and is available to the public an@ will be furnished at the Planning Commission meeting). CONSIDERATION OF A VACATION SAV #87-OS BY�RODY ASSOC7ATFS, INC.• . . . . 4b vacat� ail that �rt of Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88, being that part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, T-30, R-24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the Southwesterly line of Lot 1, Block 2, Moore Lake Hicr�lands 3td Addition, distant 30.0 feet Northwesterly oi the Southeast corner of said Lot 1, thence Southeasterly to said Southeast corner; thPnce South to a point in the South line of the Southwest Qu�rter of said Seetion 13, distant 625.0 feet West of the South quarter oorner of said Section; thence West along the South line thereof a distance of 250.0 feet; thence North at right angles to the last described line a distance of 100.0 feet; thence East and parallel to said South line a distance of 150.0 feet; thence Northeasterly a distance of 886.81 feet, nbre or less, to the point of beginning, gererally located south of West Nbore Lake Drive, east af Highway 65, north of Noore Lake and west of Central Avenue. .. �, . . 1 - 1DD 2-2G . . 3 - 3D � � PLANNING ODNAIISSION NEETING JUNE 24, 1987 ` PAGE 2 • � • • • '��' • � y�i�' i �y • � �'M � � �1' • N la1 'i 1 u .D i N i �D � � �U • Y � �4NSIDERATION OF A ifJP SPLIT. L.S. #87-05, BY THE FRIDLEY �iRA� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - 5J To split off gart of Lot 4, Block 1, Packview Manor Seoond Addition, and part of Lot 6, Block 1, Parkview t�kuior Sewnd Addition, generally located south of Central Avenue and north of Fiaclm�ann Avenue. (See Public Hearing Notice for F1a11 Legal) . �ONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE M-1 AND M-2 �ND�ISTRIAL SECTIONS OF THE CODE TO ALLOW LIMITED CONIM]ERCLAr gpSTNFSSFS IN OFFICE/L�REHCHJSE ESTABL.ISHINQdPS ...... 6- 6H REXEIVING TrIE N,INU�'S OF THE HUN19N RESGURCES �MMISSION t�EETII�G OF MAY 7. 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SFSMON kECE1VING THE PiINUTES OF THE HGQSING & RED�III,OPMENT AU7HORI'I'Y MEETING OF MAY 14, 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . WHITE kE�19ING �lE NSNU'IFS OF THE INEE�Y Q�haffSSION t�ETING OF MAY 26 r 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LII�C hECEIVING THE NSNOTES OF THE SPECIAL HUMAN RESO[JRCES 07MMISSION t�ETII�G OF MAY 28, 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SAIt�10N RE(��1VING ZHE MINUZFS OF THE HUI�YiN RESCURCES NPit�1ISSION MEETIIaG OF JTJNE 8, 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . SArr1oN RE(�'NING ZfIE N�TE5 OF THE APPFI�T,S COMMISSION MEETING OF J[Jt� 9, 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �riow C1IIlER BUSINFSS: AWQJRNN�]T CITY OF FRIDLEK " PLAIINING CUPitAISSIOt� NEETI�l6, JUTaE 3, 1987 CALI TO ORUER: Cl�airperson Billings called the June 3, 1987, Planning Comriission meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. ROLL CALL: P1enbers Present: Steve Bitlings, Oave Kondrick, Dean Saba, Sue Sherek, Don Betzold, Rictiard Svanda Mersbers Absent: None Otiiers Present: Jock Robertson, Community Deve7opment Director Daryl Morey, Planning Assistant Jerone & Janet h1eyer, 7531 Lyric Lane N,E. �im Benson, 620 tlendelssohn, r,olden Valley Randy 19cPherson, 6580 Sunny slope Dr. ilancy t1ctJaghten, 620 tlendelssohn, Golden Valley Roland [3enjamin, 7810 University Ave. tl.E. Boh Schroer, 490 Rice Cre�k Blvd. See attached list APPROVAL UF t1AY 20, 1987, PLAfdqING CQtit1ISSIDN MINUTES: MOTION by t1r. Kondrick, seconded by t4r, Saba, to approve the t4ay 20, 1987, PTann iig Comr�ission minutes as Y+ritten. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the motian carried unanir�ously. l. PUBI.IC HEARIPdG: COtdSIDEi;ATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERfiIT, SP #87-10, (3Y .irnnr.�,c. , �n . r.irT . rvro. Per 5ection ��3,6%T; C, 1, of the fridiey City Code to allow a second accessory building on Lot 15, 47ock 3, f1elody P1anor 4th Addition , the same being 7531 Lyric Lane tJ.E. MOTION by t�1r. Kondrick, seconded by f9r. Svanda, to onen the pi�blic eFaring. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chair�erson Billings declared the public hearing open at 7:34 p.m. C4r, Robertson stated ,lim Robinson, Planning Coordinator,was on vacation. He stated he would like to introduce to the Corrnission Daryl tlorev,planning Assistant. Mr. t1orey stated the request was for a second accessory buildinq, a detached garage, to be located in the rear yard. The property was located on Lyric Lane between t1adison and 5th St. The property was zoned R-1, single far�ily residential, __ _ __ __ _ _ - __ ___ —� — = -- — -- - - -- �---- � — --- --- PAGE 14 �J��G COMMI55ION MEETING, JUT1E 3, 1987 ��a ZQ foot tion it said, �� feet of the East 183 fe�he° Mr. Billinqs stated that in the vacation descrip Then there was drainage and utiliCy easement over the ldest Zti in West o{ the East 20 {�, wide between 1b3easeme$t �Y g on top of the so that was a strip So one was not was something the 3� ft. street ato z30}ft 'ht be a concern but east half of t1on. It mi9 so that was from 200 200 feet , to the descrip gtaff. other ac�°ra��obably be researched bY end to City Council that should p to recomm Qradbury, to �acate seconded by TAs. Sherek, described M0� ON by Mr. Saba> SAV #87-04, BY �• Benson and 6• approval of Vacat4�nglock 2, easement over the� �{ of� East Ranch Estates Second Additlo > e and utility 2 the east feet of easements Qn L}t a 20 foot draina9 with as follows: t� 183 feet of the North 160 feeVeS aof theAvenue 00� ' feet of the East easement lyin9 the 30 foot street aneneral}yylocated at 7�1� Universi Y the t�orth 160 5�?p��ations : the fo�low�ng er respons161e forlane costs associated with relocatlon �, Uevelop sewer rovided on north and south of of 8 inch sanitary line. Z, New utility easements to be p property to accottmbdate relocation of sewer 5 declared the motion Upon a V9i�e vote, a�ll votin9 aY�. Chairperson Billin9 carr�ed unanimouslY• 1g87' _5, RECEIVE riAY 26, 198�+ APPEALS COMMISSIOPJ MIflUYES' �o receive the MaY 26° �d seconded by Mr• Kandrick, MOTION by Mr. 8etzo. + ppea 5 Corm�tssian minutes. erson_Billings declared the mot�on �p�n a voice vote, all votin9 aYe+ GhairP carried unan�rrbusly. OTNER BUSINESS• �hanged to �une 24tn' ��30 P m 6. �----------` Reminder: June 17th mee��n9 to adjourn the meeting. Upon a ADJOU�' }957, seconded by Mr. Saba, S declared the �une 3' MOTIOfd bY M''• getZ°ld, Chairperson 8��ng vo�� e vote, al1 atin9 etin9 adJourned at 9:35 p.m. Plannin9 C�mission � sub itted, Res ectfully � � � ynpe �a a Recordin9 Secretary �_ ; �1. ,, . ��Vi' ,' �'�2 �'� �f ,(/ .�i..—Y_EJ y��; �;,,� I .�; � .� <, `_ r � ��,f;,��4�� Gr,�_;s�,� —��q --� � )�-/%� � ��7C=/tl.�iG/(.� � ' � \ \ \ `D \� �� . � ` �\\�` \ ♦ � 1 .. 1^�. " . -"� � �-.i'/`. \ i ��°. 1� � / �.F -��' � s� �� . l.l. �.' i` �'.�.�� :. � ,� ,i -�--,� ` f � i. / °a�_� �/�'��, � . i� � ��:.—.,.-r—!" ,�� _ «.� .. — �� I i �� /� Y :�. ^�1� L�- �' � —^�,c*-�� t - d� �'��'I „ !i_�;1 �;_:�s :� � . �i '_ . . : � : � .�! t , i t v U �� t;,�_ 5�.:..�-ysi�r-� YJ�'. ` - // n — � > i'.^ � i/�. _�J._(r--`_r�Cf.f�V _ S,�'� ( - � . . � ' �' ' � }� ��i �� J lv�' Y. - iJ � �.." /: y , j _i . .�".�— �r i� l/ ;i � r" � , _ "— ��l � ; G � [,' ..� /i ��—_ i, Z � � . ;� � t��_ ". �; _��- � �- �7r'7�� i��t-�' `��,:� �� , / l<r � ,, � �`� :� � ��i/,_�� ='--� � �7� �r�l�f'' / � �- �5�� /�-f�� <ct�_ �-� J ��(/� � i � � ' 7� %�-�j � ?�r��r 7 �S � d' ,� �' �� 2.c.cc,cL =%�` � � ;u r.��- � �: � ; � , / : �, :��. % �7 { � � .��'/i�i '�.`��/�'�i7�i�%�iQX/ J�J�J �'�cy(„ -j�;i.�; �--�. ��.wC�l� _7%� �'��... Jf. , , . � .� 1 . / . � r I I) \ /�,`,.`��2�:ti. _.� C._i�� / /1 J I J �r_ YI �{�� .�... l�'..A.i. . •\.� ('� ✓�.. J.. / � /� � ` : � A'.�'�.� - , �t-GC� 7 � � � /Cp-."�1� �' , �� y'��2�'� �P- . i- _.�%L-� C m � r � J� ; � � ( �///" �' ` $ % c� � 7 � ��`C l'+�' � . � � r' c �.�1 •CtTY OF FRIDLEY C�B431 UNlYERSITY AYE. N.E. FRIOLEY, MN Sb432 � (612)571-3450 REZONlNG REQUEST ZOA � VACATION REQUEST SAV � I PLATTING RE(2UEST P.S. #b�-O(� R�UEST FEE � PARK FEE itE�'EZfT # � ( SCHFSxJLID F3,ISNNING QJF4;ISSION MEEfIIJG IYiTE �y l�� S�iIDULID CITY Q�UNCIL MEETING 04'i'E PROPERTY INFORMATION ....,,. . ►►� �. LE�AL DESCRIPtI029: See attached Exhibit "A" LOT BLACK 'IRACt/ADDITIC?N PRFSfNT ZONIIJG �'��_p�A�_ R$2UFSTID ZONING 1�� REASCLd it7R REQUFST: A site glan shawinq the proposed future use is re3uired for all rezoning. Not ap_plicable - �'J�j�}[�, uJ'AOG� ��4'LG til — �k**t*at,kitt#*****fr�t*#�t*i:#,t##ii**#**tsltir�*frRli*i#t**t+k**st***i�**irt*i:*t*i:tik*iii:�ktkR*�Tk** OWNER INFORMATlON �� {please jX].Rt) Shorewood P a�a Parrnarc a PHt7[dE � Minnesota General Partnership, an undivided 88.�5% interest, and Richard E. Timmers, an 2233 North 53GN�URE 220, St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 � IY�'I'E _ *****:*�**r***,�*sa*�:**a*x**«*�**�*�*,r*�*«***�*xx**,�***rx*�*******�*,t**«�**+***�**,r* PETITIONER INFORMATION NANE {pl2ase p[ittt) �.r A thnn�* �ri l lgg ct��.g�_.I�iONE # �7Q-�028 Center, Inc. Ap�R�$ _ 25 Univets�tv Avenue Southeast Minneapolis. Minnesp�3_.�,5 '� szc�u� ***�«*:*�***�***x********.*:,� r�nn�uac a�rv�sswN : Arxiwm QTY O�UNCII,: APPS20JF9 STII�JLATIONS: �-3-8� .******:*x*.*�*****:***�*�****�*�*�**��**** �. � ��. ,,. -� �� a. +� � � ., . • �. s_ � �� .• �y _ - •�� Abtice is herebp given that there will be a Public Heari.ng of the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wecfiesc'l�y, June 24, 1987 in.the Council (1�anber at 7:30 p.m. for the purFvse of: Consideration of a Preliminary Plat, P.S. 587-06, Shorewood Plaza, by St. Anthony Village Shopping Center Inc., being a replat of all that part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, T-30, R-24, described as follows: Commencing at the most southezly oorr�er of Moore Lake Highlands, First Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota; thence in a southwesterly direction at right angles to the south right of way line of 63rd Avenue N.E. as ozigir�lly glatted of said Moore Lake Highlands, First Addition, a distance of 175 feet; thence in a southeasterly direction at right angles to the line just described along a lictie parallel to said south right of way line of 63zd Avenue N, E, of said Moore Lake Highlands, First Addition, extended, a distance of 169.75 feet to the actual point o£ beginning; thence in a northwesterly direction along the line just desccibed, a distance of 449.25 feet; thence in a westerly direction at a deflection angle to the left 22 degrees, 20 minutes, a distance of 3D9 feet; thence in a southwesterly direction at a deflection angle to the left of 77 degrees, 22 minutes to a�roint af intersection with the saukh line of said Section 13, thence Easterly along the said south line to a point 625 feet west of the south Quarter corner of said Section 13; thence i.n a northerly direction to the actual point of beginning containing 21 acres, mare or less, according to g�verrment surve�; except therefrom the following tracts: Tra t: All that �rt of Lots 16 and 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88 or that g3rt of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, T- 30, R-24, Anoka Co�ty, Minnesota, described as folla,rs: Beginninq at the intersection of the �utheasterly cic�t of way line of State Highway No. 65 and ttie s�uth line of said Southwest Quarter of Section 13; thence east along the south line of said Southwest Quarter for a distance of 232.0 feet to a point, said point beinq 1294.80 feet, more or less, west of south Quarter corner of said Sectian 13; thence north at right angles to the lask described line for a diskance of 285.59 feet; thence northwesterly with a deflection angle to the left at 78 degrees 54 minutes 09 seoonds for a distance of 163.61 feet, more or less, to the said southeaskerly right of way line; thence southwesterly along said southeasterly right of way to the Foint � beqinning. Subject to a 30 toot wide easement for road purposes along the northwesterly side. Tract 2: All that part of Lots 16 and 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88 lying between the east right of way line af State Highway No. b5 and a point or line 30 feet east of said right of way of State Trunk Highway No. 65 and south of the south lot line of Lot 8, Block 2, Abore Lake Aighlands 3rd Addition and north of that part of Lots 16 and 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88 previously deeded to the City of Fridle� and described as parcel 1820, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88, g3rcel n�miber 1820 beinq further described as, all that prt af Lots 16 and 17, Auditox's Subdivision No. 88 or that part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, T-30, R-24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beqinning at the intersection of the southeasterly right of way line of State Highway No. 65 and the south line of said Southwest Q�nrter of Section 13, thence east along tbe south lire of said Southwest Qu3rter for a distance of 232,0 feet to a p�int, said point being 1294.80 feet, more or less, west of south Quarter corner of said Section 13; thance north at ri�t angle to the last c�scribed line foz a distance of 285.54 feet; thence northwesterly with a deflection angle to the left of 78 c�grees, 54 minutes, Q9 seconds for a distance of 163.61 £eet, more or less, to the said southeasterly right of way line; thence �uthwestezly along said southeasterly right of way to the point of beginning. : P.S. #87-06 ShorEwood Plaza Page 2 Tr t: That g3rt of the Southwest Q�rter of Section 13, �-30, F.�24, lying east of a lirie drawn 30 feet east of the eastecly line of State Hiqhway No. 65, as the same is naa laid out and constructed, and south of the south lir�e of HSooze Lake Hiqhlands 3rd Addition and the same extenc3ed easterly, and lying north of the following described tract: that part of Gwerrment Lots 1 and 2, Section 13, T-30, R-24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying 33.� feet on each side of the following desczibed center line: Conunencing at the northeast cprner of said Garerrment Lot 2, Section 13, T-30, R-24; thence west along the north line thereof 238.81 feet; thence to the lef t on a tangential curve having a radius 230.0 feet and a delta angle af 59 degrees 24 minutes a distance of 238.45 feet; thence southeasterly tangent to said curve 527.71 feet; thence to the right along a tangential curve having a radius of 230.0 feet and delta angle o£ 62 degrees, 16 minutes, 40 seconds a distance of 250.0 £eet; thence westerly tangent to said curve 423.78 feet; more or less, to the easCerly line of State Highway No. 65 as the same is naw laid out and oonstructed, being a part of Lots 16 and 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88, Anoka Coimty, Minnesota. Tra t: That g3rt of Lots 16 and 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88, also being part of Yhe Southwest Quarter of Section 13, R�-30, F 24, Anoka County, Minnesota described as follavs: Beginning at a point on the sauth line of said Southwest Quazter, distant 232.0� feet east of the intersection of the southeasterly right of way line of State Highway No. 65 az�d the said south line; thence north, at a right angle to said south lire, 285.54 feet; thence east, �x rallel with the said south line, 156.81 feet; thence south 284.54 feet to a point on the said south line. distant 156.81 feet east of the point of beginning; thence west, along said south line to the point of beginning. Being registered land as is evidenced tr� Ceztificate of Tit1e No. 32398. Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88; all that part of Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the south Quarter oorner of Section 13, T-30, P.-24; thence westerly along the souY,h line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section, 625 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be heretr� described; thence northerly a distance of 974 feet, nbre or less, to the southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 2, Moore Lake Hiqhlands 3rd Addition; thence northeastezly along the southeasterly line of Moore Lake Hia,h.tands 3rd Addition, 2�i1. feet to the northeasterly line of 63rd Avenue N.E,; thence northwesterly alonq said northeasterly line of said 63rd Avenue N.E. 151:95 feet to the southeasterly line of Nioore Lake lst Addition to the north line of said Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88, and there terminating. Subject to poztions taken for Nbore Lake Road and Old Central Avenue and easements of record, if any. Generally located south of West Moore Lake Drive, east of 8ighway 65, north of Moore Lake and west of Central Avenue. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated tim�e and plac�. STEUE BII,LINGS t�IAIRNY�bI _ PLANNING OJMMISSION Publish: Jtne 8, 1987 3Lme 15, 1987 1C s�v #s�-os SP k87-13 P.S. k87-06 St. Anthony Village MAILI2� LISf Planning June Sl 1987 Council St. Anthony Village Shopping Center Virgil Brenney Frank tr'alters 25 University Avenue Southeast 6187 Heather Circle N.E. 12482 Panerado Court Minneapolis, NA] 55414 Fridley, MN 55432 San Diego, CA 92128 Shore�rood Plaza Partriers Jeanne t4ehlhoff Douglas Tanner 2233 North tiamline Avenue, Suite 22D 6170 Heathes Place N.E. 2206 St. Antl�ony BoUlevarc St. Paul, M�l 55113 Fridley, i�iN 55432 P:inneapolis, riN 55418 George SY.inner 6217 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, D� 55432 Bonnie Fater 6096 Svood�� Lane N.E. Fridley, ri:� 55432 Clinton Stran3 6122 t�7oa:y Lane N.�. Fridley, D1N 55432 Clair Liabraaten 6128 u.00dy Lane N.E. Fridley, r�t 55432 Franl: Det�lello 6139 Woody Lane N.E. Fridle}�, t�1 55432 Isabelle Joirlal 6133 Woody Lane h.E. Fridley, rL'� 55432 Loren Adolphson 6131 hbo3v Lane N.£. Fridley, r'�1 55932 Walter Rydbezc� 6127 l�body Lane N.E. Fridley, bL'� 55432 Tr'illiam Gagner 6125 Stibody Lane N.E. Fridley; -hi�1 55432 [ti'a}�ne Welch 6115 Tr3�ocy Lane N.E. Fridley, b'CV 55432 Je`frey Saarela 62A9 Ben More Drive N.E. Fridley, A7:� 55932 Brickner B�ailders 6249 Sen More Drive N.E. Fridley, NIN 55432 Douglas Tanner 6355 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, b�1 55432 Mark 8ue Douglas Tanner 6229 Central Avenue N.E. 6357 Pierce Street N.E. Fsidley, MN 55432 Fridley, DII�1 55432 Dorothy hliles Mark Clasen 1370 Rice Creek FQad N.E. 5332 F=yrrond Avenue Fridley, MN 55932 P'ioundsview, MN 55112 Je£fre�° Geldert Mark Clasen 6291 Central Avenue N.E. 6395 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, AII� 55432 Gregosy Stenhoff R�ert ShimansY.i 6283 Central Avenue N.E. 6335 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, t�'C�7 55432 Richard Hartfiel Rd�ert Shim3nsl:i 6271 Central Avenue N.E. 7458 Hayes Street N.E. Fridley, tII: 55432 Fridley; MN 55432 Harold Margan wayne Iarson 6245 Central Avenue N.E. 1216 Sanfill Cizcle Fridley, Mh 55432 Brooklyn Park, MN 55449 Richard tiochinski S�'ayne Larson �25b E Care�rce Circle N.E.6325 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, DII� 55432 Fridley, M[�I 55432 Rice Creek Properties Resident 1315 Rice Creek Road N.E. 6327 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, i�II9 55432 Fridley, t-'Il� 554:,2 Fortune Invesarents 4611 E 36th Street Minneapolis, M�; 55406 Ziebart of Dlinnesota 6300 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, !�L'v 55432 Resident 6315 Pierce Street P..E. Fridley, tRv 55432 blitchell C�riazdon 6350 Pierce Street h.E. Fridley, r�: 55432 s�v rs�-os SP #87-13 P.S. �87-06 St. Anthony Village PAGE 2 Beatrice Laubach 6336 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, DII3 55432 Henzy Peterson 6312 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 rlarvel McQaughton 6300 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, DSN 55432 �•�illiam Hauan 6301 Dellwood Drive N.E. Fridley, t4d 55432 Ja'ui Keller 6315 Dellwood Drive N.E. Fridley, �sl 55432 Richard Ficocello 6329 Dellwood Drive N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Eugene Ouellette 6343 Dellwoad Drive N.E. Fridley, D1N 55432 Terr}� Dalzen 6308 f�llwood Drive N.E. Fridley, Fiti 55432 tlartin Burditt 1065 - 63rd Avenue N.E. Fridley, Pi�I 55432 Daniel Nelson 6080 Central Avenue N.E Fridley, b'L*7 55932 Daniel T3elson 6070 Central Avenue N.E Fridley, biN 55432 Tt�omas Gray 6062 Central Avenue N.E. Fsidley, t�t 55432 Carl Wielnuin 60�4 Central Avenue h.E Fr:idley, NL�I 55432 Jan�s ReilazrI 60b8 Wcrx3y Lane h.E. FYidley, Mh 55432 Mark Wilke 6063 Central Avenue N.E. Fridle}�, MN 55432 Leslie Wilke 6061 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, t�IN 55932 Harold Saanson 6064 S,body I.ane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Kazimierz Tariczyk 6060 Fi�ody Lane N.E. Fridley, f9n 55432 hiargaret Nelson 6090 Stir�ocly Lane N.E. Fridley, hst 55432 Everett Utter G06�? 47ood}' Lane N.E. Fridley, h�� 55432 Harold Lird 6676 S;oocly Iane N.E. Fridley, DID7 55432 Kenneth Taylor 6065 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, NC� 55432 Shore4:md Inn 6161 Highway 65 h.E. Fric'1ey, NLti 55432 Resident 6280 Highway 65 N.E. Fridley, Mi`: 55432 Skyline Vet 6220 Highway 65 N.E. Fridley, MI� 55432 A1ore Lake FUneral Chapel 6210 Highway 65 N,E. Fridley, I�d 55432 hallace Pliller 831 - 40th Avenue r:.E. riinneapolis, t1.ti 55421 Sears Store 6199 Highway 65 K.E. Fridley, r� 55932 1� St. Phillips Church 6180.Highway 65 N.E. Fridley, DIN 55932 Resident 6289 Highway 65 N.E. Fridley, t'Cv 55432 Richarcl rloen 1128 - 63rd Avenue h.E. Fridley, �L� 55432 Fdward 3cc*aal 1119 - b3rr3 Avenue N.�. Fridley, r9h 55432 Fridley Church of Christ 1100 - 63rd Avenue N.E. Fridley, r4� 55432 John Bergstrom 1086 - 63rd Avenue N.E. Fridley, rL'v 55432 tdary Tistun 10'72 - 63rd Avenue N.E• Fridley, t�� 55432 Gary Pierce Star Route 9, Hor. 152 Bismark, DID 58501 Scott Kohanke 6ll6 Central Avenue `.:.i:. Fridley, M:� 55432 Shorewoa: Plaa.a Shoppir.� 6225 Highway 65 1�.E- Fridley, N'v' S5432 � CITYOF FR! DLEY PLANNING DIVISION MEMt)RANDUM MEt'D ZO: Planning Commission Jock Robertson, Caiurnmity Developnent Director F1E[�i� FRCrf: Jim Robins�n, Planning G�ordinator 3� t�t� IY+TE: Jine 19, 1987 P.F�AF2DIN,;: Staff Report for Maore Lake Cormnons Attachments: LocatioNZoning Maps Preliminaly Plat Narrative from Developec Ozdinance 359 tRezoning to PUD) with Map Apprwal fran Fua� Cnrp Apprwal fran LiJR Reduction af Drainage Plan Reduction af Develognent Plans Ose and Parking Analysis for Raa7uetlHealth Qub [�7��t Broc3� and Associates (Commercial Center), Northwest Raoquet, Saim and Health Qubs, Inc. (raa�uetlhealth club}. Represented b� Norm Brody and Gerald Rlmk, respectively. I,OCATION- Soutii of Rice Creek Road and west aE Old Central. REO(JESrED ACPIONS• . 1. Platting of approximately 21 acres. 2. Special Use Permit approval for construction of a parking lot in an otsolete flood plain. 3. Vacation of 1.7 acres of City property na�r held for dzair�ge p�uposes. Pi1RPO5E • 1b oonstruct a multi-use oo�neccial building of 55,625 �yuare feet in area and also to construct a health and racquet club of approximately 180,000 s3uare feet. Planning Cottmussioci Jock Robertson J�e 19, 1987 Page 2 �IZE: The property will be glatted into two buildable lots with two autlots north of Rice Cteek Raad. 2he oommercial center parcel will have approximately 6.4 acres, the healthlraaiuet club parcel will have roughly 13.7 acres and the two outlots will have approximately .5 acre together. - �. _ �. • n � u • �. The majority of the proFerty is zoned C-3, feneral Shopping. One exception includes a Fart west of and immediately adjacent to Central Avenue of approximately 3.8 acres which is zoned AJD, Planned Unit Development. The properties to the south and east of the proposed develognent area zoned R-1, Sinyle Family R�sidential. The properties to the mrth are zoned M-1, Light Industrial, i�l, Single Family Residential and C-3, General Shopping. 'Ib the west of the proposed develognent is additional C-3, General Shopping. �s r• , �s � The FridlEy Compr�ensive Plans 1990 Land Use Mag shows this location as S-2, Redevelognent District. The purpose of this special zoning district is to allav for mixed use developnent within s�cial redevelopment districts, set up uzc3er 462 of the l�iiru�esota State Statutes, for health, safety and general welfare of the City. This entire area has been designated b� the City of Frici2Ey Housing & Redevelognent Authority as a redevelopment district. The proposed use of the property is cansistent with the 1990 desicg�ation. i'I��:�i��'J a�A On Deceml�er 5, 1966 the City Council formally approved Ordinance 354 which r�oned 3.8 acres of the propo�d project site on Central Avenue fr� R-1 and C-2S to the PUD tPlanned [3nit Development) classification. The general intent at that time was to oonstruct a shopping center although no specific plans were presented or appraved. The original FUD ordinance under which this properiy was r¢ oned stated that "if develognent within the FUD was not begun within one year from the enactment of the Ozdinance establishing it, this fact would be reported to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission was to make recammendations to the City Council who could decide whether the P[7D would remain in effect or be dropped and thus revert to the origiral zoning status. There is no action of re�rd shvaing that the praperty was ever the subject of rEView related to the lack of timely develognent. The present FUD urdinance states that if after rhree years from thE time of the district establishment there is no developnent. the property would autanatically zevert to the zoning district in effect prior to that action �nless an extension was granted. David NEwrran, the assistant City Attorney, has addzessed this issue on m� ra�uest. His opinion is as follarrs: "Due to the fact that the Saliterman FUD property was r¢ oned prior to the automatic termination clause and also due to the fact that there were nevec plan sutmittals, staff reviews or Council action based on the lack of timely develognent, the present A7D classification should remain in effect. The rationale is that the automatic sun setting of the PUD status would be a retroactive apglication of tooay's Code. 1F Planning Commission Jock 12obertson Jume 19, 1987 Page 3 7t�e present PUD ordinance chazges the Planning Conunission with interpreting the prwisions of the HJD district and forwarding recommendations to City Coimcil. 4he 4th agenaa iten related to the Moore Lake Commons project is the adoption of develognent glans as thEy relate to the 3.8 acre FUD area. UTILITIFS: 2he pzoject will be served tx a 24 inch storm sewer pipe which presently r�ms fzcm the west end of the property undez Highway 65 and discharges into a ditch which nms north and parallel to Highwa� 65, flowing to Rice Creek. An esctensive storm water c3rainage system has been desic�red for both develojxnents bi R Nelson Associates, Inc, The glan reglaces the existing City holding pond and praoides additional cap3city for the develognent itself through the imp7.enentation of four new ponds. Three of them on the immediate site and the fourth one on Oatlot B, north of Rice Creek Road. This plan will be surmitted to the Rice Creek Watershed District for approval. Zt should be noted that discharge into Moore Lake is limited to 100 year or gzeater rain fall eJents. The project is also served bl an eight inch sanitaiy sewer line which runs north iuider Rice Creek Raad to the Central Avenue lift station. There also is a 12 inch water line in Central Avenue and an eight inch water main in Rice Creek Ita3d. TRAFFIC ANAI,YSIS: In 1984, traffic ��mts for Rice Creek Road show 3,600 trips just west of Central Avenue and 5,400 trips just east of Highwa� 65. Traffic on Central Avenue adjacent to the project was approximately 7,500 cars per c3ay. The c3evelopers have estimated that the health cluh would generate 1,000 users per � while ti�e o�mmercial center would generate 500 users per day. Assuming un autanobile occugency of 1.2 peraons per vehicle, this would result in an additional 2,500 vehicles per day on Rice Creek Road. In conj�mction with the new development, the City is proposing to improve Rice Creek Road l� creating two lanes in each direction and by adding protected left turn lanes for major drivEwa�s. In addition theze will be a free right turn oonstructed for southbo�d traffic on Central Avenue which will help divert traffic onto Rice Creek Road and to Highway 65. The imprwed right of w� i.s being desicp�ed to state aid standards and will be com�rable to Mississippi Street and Osborne Road which carzy voliunes of uaffic in excess of 10,000 vehicles per dzy. No curb cuts will be installed on Central Avenue. One major joint driveway is proposed, at a central location to toth projects, on Rice Creek Rc�d. Ztao a�litioral "release valve" drives are planned, one on the west end of the site and one on Rice Creek Ra�d 16� feet west of the Central Avenue right of way , 1G Planning Commission Jock Robert�n J�me 19, 1987 Page 4 •,��.:_. �� « • In addition to Rice Creek Watershed apprwal the developer has also received approval from the Army Corgs of Engineers to glace fill material in approximately one acre af isolated wetlands ttt�der the Dep�rt�nent of the Army nation wide �ermit. Sn addition, the I]NR has reviewed the site and the praposed plans and has inc3icated that no L�NR permit is ra�uired for the project. �rie deveto�r has indicated that the blaaing of dust during the Qonstruction season will be mitigated b� the fact that the s�ils being remwed are heavy peat versus sand. Arrp blowing will be controlled i�+ water trucks on the site. Upon completion of the project, extensive landscape screening will be installed to buffer the develognent frcm the residential properties to the south of the c�velognent and al� along the east side of the develognent. Parking areas will also be screened witl� landscape matezial. 7Y�e project has been desicy,ed to present a�leasing viav fram Moore Lake and Highway 65. Parking is set back from the Lake approximately 200 feet. E�ctensive landscaping is also utilized between the p�zking lot and the Lake itself. As �rt of the c3evelopnent agprwal process the developer will be asked to enter into a stormsrater �nnd maintenance agreenern similat to that recently si�ed with the Springbrook Apartrnent developers. 24ie s�ecial use permit for oonstruction of a�rking lot in the flood plain is r«�uired t� the o--1 Section of the Code which deals with cieek and river preservation. In 1981 the Sur£ace Water rianagement Act was passed which required local municipalities to create regulations related to the preservation of creek and river floodplain and flood£ringes. These requlations also irrg�acted the Moore Lake area. At that time a large area of the proFnsed project was oonsicjered{!� the approximation method)to �e part of trie 100 year floo�lain. 2bpograFhic sunre�s frcm 1955 on file at the City rev�l the large marstrp ar� which was subject to periodic flooding. In 1982 when the Ordirr�nce was enacted this area was outlined on the 2oning map as CR- 1, Floodplain. A reoenk topographic survEy, b,r the developer, ievealed that that area had been filled prioc to the leqislative enactments and therefore was erro�ously categorized as floodglain. This matter has been discussed with John Stine of the DNR and he ooncurs with our interpretation reqarding the ot�olete status of this ajerla� district. It would be possible to ac�ninistratively zancue this floodglain classification. This could be tsi¢ertaken upon the o�ncurrence of the Rice Creek Watershed District. In the meantime, to avoid f uture delays, the special use permit to construct a p�rking lot in the flooc�lain is being processed. � Plarvung Camnission Jock Robertson Jtme 19, 1987 Pdge 5 • •�,�_• The project is in oomgliance with the C-3, General Shopping, section of the Code. Building setbacks along Central Avenue area 80 feet while setbacks off of Rice Creek Rc�d area 100 feet. Lot area ooverage for the raajuet/health club is approximately 308. Lot ooverage foz the mixed use wmmercial center is 20�. The Code re3uires 80 foot setback fran ri�t of ways and allows up to 35$ lot ooverage for each develognent. Parking for the c�velorzaent includes 296 stalls f or the commercial center with 278 r�uired and 414 for the taa�uet/health club. 7rie FridlEy d�de does not prescribe a specific amount of parking stalls for health/raoquet club facilities. However, the Code does allcw for oonsideration of the particulat nature of proposed uses in determining the re3uired n�nber of �rking stalls. Extensive re�iew of other mimicipa].ities re,+eals a wide variety of apprc� ches to dealing with this problan. Based upon research of the developers other clulzs throughout the ZWin City atea it would appear that the FridlEy site is proposed to be parked at 2.3 cars per 1,000 s7are feet-above the average. I anticig3te that as this club natures, there may be a need f or either satellite �rking f acilities or the installation of a parking ranp. At this time, we are stipulating that the wmmercial center and raoquet/health club developers enter into a joint driveway and parking agreement prior to occup3nc.y of t]�e develognent. OUALITATIVE ISSUFS: Presently, final review of the most recent developnent plan su�nittals is �nder wa�. A oomglete list of stipulations telated to this project will be available at the Planning Couunission meeting. � .� I�87-141 lI � Q N ; P. �"Ztro . -.- � , 7S 7r 75 �.». �. . �� h � � 0 a i �1 h^ �0 �r <,� /.fs7af Cifr of fi,{,4/' 7s; 16.7� cw � /f) (is ooJ AUDITORS .. -- RtCE--. i• .�. . . .... . • � • . . . � �...:a.. (f) � • •�.� • • • ..• • • • ••,� • . • • ;/BOOI � • • • • � • • • • • • • •.• • • • Cen'ro///s�rr� • • w • • ,c.'eriv.., �ar. . • . . . . . . • • • • • � � 4 � • • • • • • • e.1 • • • • • • f' �� • • • • • • �� •� • • • • S U BD .�;•;•;•;�;r:•:•:•:•: ..�....... ......r...... .......... .:.. �.....�+ • * • •, • • • • • A •: • •: • • • • • • •'.w Y • .� • • • • • • � .�.-{ •'•;�1 • • • • • • • • ��l��r��ii�� • � • • • 1' • • • • • • • • • �• • • y • • • • • • • • '"� •; • ♦ �. • • • • • • • • • • ♦ R� • • • • • • • • • • ►•. • �" • } • • • • • • • • • �• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •'� • •�• • • • • • • • • • •.' • • • • • • • • • v�t. • • • .� •� . • • •�• • .. . .. . .. . .' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •) • • 1Y EQ, s . , .� r '.•.t✓,d�.�: fr� • • • • • • �� •�� • �i ... . . . . . ,. . � . ,: ------°--'• •_• •_•_• ._• _•_�•_•_!_• ' "� l.l --�t��-�, � t ) j� �..�.,� ^�n —�� o �, . C � �r� t ,,,e N w � TF ACE. `� y� � (s0 i: . s. °� r. �IPK �• � • a"' n '�.i�.v,v N .... .. _ _' • • • • ` • • N • • t' • • • • • ry • • �. • • • i •, • • • • ✓• • • • • r • r • • • • . . . r . . . . �� • . . r • . • • • .�. -t . . • . • • . • . • • • ..• • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • � • • .• • • • • + � . • . . . • • . • • . • . • • • • • . • . . . • • • . • • . • . • . • • • . • . • • . ' • • • • • . • . � r • • . • . • . . _ . • . • • . • + �' ."�7.-. . . • . • . • . •� �. • • • • • r��• • • • • • • . •. . . •�. • .� •:. • . • . . .� . • . . • .:• a . • • • . • � . . . .�. . . i . . � . . . . .............. • • • • �, • • • i .� • fR � • • • � • • • • • • , • • -�_-��- • • • • . • • • '• . • • • • • .....,.. ...r.... ........... ,.... . . . ., . . . . . .r.�. . . . ...,.,......... .... :. �.y... ... .... . ............... . . .:..� . . .. . . . . . . . . �. 1 • . . . . * � . . . Jire• . . • � • .�, . • . '• . • v.,. • • . . . • • • • . • • •••}• /n•.•.•••.•• . � . . j9 ov�i . . . . . . . . . ..• . . . • . • . . . . • �,. : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .•� . . . • . . . • . • . • . . . • •-• • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • •;• • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • w • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ♦ • • • • • • • • • • • •�• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . s� • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • o • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • L• • • • • • • • • • • :�.�� y.�.�.��.�.�.�.��.• • • • �• •V • • • • • • • • • • ...., ............. ...� ............. ..... ............. .... .............. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • r • • • • i • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • � • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • •�.ti�i� • •: • • • • • • • • • • ♦-a-- •: • • • • • • .. • • • • i��i' i � � • • • • • • • • • • • • • !A. "� • • • • • • �f0 ......., 5 , • � • • • • • • • • • • • • � - �� x � � � ll.l � �� , 5°�S • • • • • • • . n�� P. • • • • • • • ' ��. •�� r��• o � (1$) C•, r�t � I • • • • • • • �,, O . �. . I • • • • • • • •••••••� t � � ....... ia.srr r. i. �2. $ ��r � I S �• 34 . � OCATION MAP�� 'L P�'GL/M!N/-irZY PL/iT Sf-�D�Cyt/ODl) f-'L�tZA _ : / � �:�._��.� _�j � I �� ro � / 5 mx ¢T. — �- ' /.� .tt�a � i � '�i .. �'s' -_ ��.... � � "'i-�� .. �' �'F ....� . � _ i _ r� J�L+B ��j,�'.'0{. "__"_""._ _ �� ' ,i4L;I` � \ � asa.+ � � u 1.�, '�/,'�n:v�i>,� \\ �j4�`•^•,; �/'��' �l I � '- ... � .'I , .'oi?�� \�� •c' /",' i' � ii- --\ �'�i� ' / r I ! I ( :' ,/;� : .: t�W;� i �� :: ,' �'� <<�� Lot 1. 1 I `/ { E \ /� � n.�o�e , �-� �/� , �' S' ' . /.. ,•: !� ./ � I ` �` � '' f 2 j .,` :; ,';;f � 2 � - � � ��. � < � °� ' � 11�'N4� - ,.J��• 'y1.�� I. ' -��:I ♦� � �• .� L� l ' MC �Fl: . r �`�` � � �. �t✓ � . . •_--^ -•. " . y ! "• . _. ........ - ~ � • � � �O' �� . ' . �� 1 ` i - - ' �� -. .% T� � `I - � . �� ,. r ;_- - _-, _ � °. I,,: � : si,� K i ., J, :�� , iL i i `-'� : r. � , _._. ; . „ �._ �� . � J . : ' ' � r. ' '�.�. , t', �—_ � . 7 J ' c� } ��. . �. • .. y � , - _ e � � . t : ,1 „o . . . . � - _ � . ....�. ; _� ,., . - � � .-. _ ::;°=-< � =-= - -- --; � - � - " ' � „ - . .. .._.�__-=;_ :�;' � . _ � - — _ . �. .,. - __ � =_ �. , � , _ � .-- �� , - - ----�-� —, _ .. --------_ ----:_�_ _ -_ _._... _ . _ _ _--- - , . � , - w 7 �__.�._. __--- ��--- -�r ,.,, _ , .:�..:; � nnooaE 1 � __�- LAK£ / � 6:u PLAT MAP � .� � � NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION � 1M MOORE LAKE COMDtONS PROJECT Applicant is the owner of Shorewood Plaza Shopping Cen[er and the Optionee of:the adjacen[ 21 acre tract upon which it and P:or[hcvest Racquet, Swim and Health Clubs propose to con-struct a multi-tenant retail facility, office and racquet, swim and health clubs. The en[ire development, including the existing shopping center, will be renamed Moore Lake Commons. The owners of the F.ealth club, Northwest Racquet, Swim and Health Clubs are submitting, conte�poraneousiy with [his application, a separate application for PUD Approval of the facility. The description of that por[ion of the project is contained on a separate narrative. The applicants propose a two-phase project. 1. Renovation of the existing Shorewood Plaza Shopping Cen[er to include the following: a. New canopy to modernize the appearance of the building; b. New sign hand to present uniform signage on the existing buildin�; c. P.e-surface and re-stripe parking; d. New plantings; This phase does not require ci[y approval. 2. Construction of a 55,625 square foot building of brick and masonry with prefinished metal canopy designed for 41,625 square feet of restaurant, retail and service businesses on the iirst floor and 10,900 square feet of second floor office. Eite Characteris[ics The portion of the land upon which applicant proposes its project is sloping from East to West, the [dest being on-grade with Rice Creek Drive. The site is wooded with various species of deciduous trees. Developer proposes to clear the site, construct the new building and landscape upon completion of [he 6uilding. Pccess and ParkinR - The applicable City Ordinance requires 309 parking spaces of �.�hich applicant is providing 296 spaces on site. However, applicant and health club propose a cross parking agreement to accom�odate overflow of parking. In addition, peak times for office hours are different than the peak hours for the balance of the site so that the same spaces may be utilized by users at different tines. Office and employee pazking is designated at rear of project. � Access to the building is proposed off two points on Rice Creelc Drive — one driveway shared with the health club and the other near Central Avenue. BuildinR DesiRn The building will be o£ brick and masonry construction designed to match coloration of the health club. Accent colors of blue, white and green were chosen to match the health club's accent colors and to integrate the project. The canopy and office roof will be prefinished blue metal with 20 year guaranty on color. The blue panels will "wrap" the rear of the building to present a finished appearance to the residential neighborhood to the East of the building. A white stucco sign band will provide an a[tractive surface for affixing signs to identify the businesses. A green accent s[ripe will be featured on the lower edge of the sign band. The rooftop HVAC units will be screened from sight by the parapet wall formed by wrapping the metal canopy as a design de[ail to the rear of the building. Proposed Uses A restaurant of up to 7,200 square feet is proposed a[ the en[rance to the development. r'o [enant has committed at this date., The balance of the first floor space is proposed for retail or service business uses typical to shopping centers in general. The second story office facility of approximately 10,900 square feet is sezviced by an elevator and stairway located in the "elbow" of the building. Applicant anticipates moving its offices [o this space upon completion. Landscave and Screenin� A professionally designed landscape plan will be implemented. The East end of the project abutting Central will have a wooden fence to screen the project fron Central. Plantings will be installed East of the fence to lessen the impact of the fence. Roulevard plantings will border Rice Creek Drive. Plantings �aill also be installed in the parking islands in the parking lot. Ail trash receptacles will be screened from view. Si�na�e Applicant intends to impose control signage on the site. joint entrance with the health the Easterly entrance will driveway. Sign Criteria for all Tenants to One pylon cvill be located at the club. A ground sign identifying be installed at the proposed 1"! 10 LiRhtin� Applicant intends to install "wall pack" lighting on the rear of the building which will illuminate the parking lot. The "�oall packs" will have "cut offs" so as not to shine into the neighbors' yards. The parking lot will be lit with light standards complying with city requirements. These lights and the "wall packs" will be controlled with a timer to turn off approximately two hours after closing. Conclusion Applican[ believes the project will be an asset to the City and respectfully requests that the City consider the proposal for approval. ORDI�A�CE N0. 354 A� ORDI�A.\CE TO h`�t�D TNE CI1Y CODE OF TF� CITY OF FRIDLEY, `II��£SOiA BY PIAKING A C}IANGE IN 20\IFG DISTRICTS 2he Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follovs; SECTIOR 1 SECTIO\ 2 Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is anended as hereinafter indicated. ?he cract or area vithin the Councy of Anoka and the City of Fridley and described as: All [hat par[ of Lo[s 4 and 17, Auditor's Subdivison To, 88 [hat lies vithln the follotiing described lines: Comnencins ac the Northeast (�E) corner of Loc 5 of said Auditor's Sub- division, [hence Mest along [he Torth line of said Lo[ 5[o the Mest right of vay line of Cen[ral Avenue, [he ac[ual point of be�inning, [hence continuing l:est along the north line of said Lot 5 to a poinc locaced 40.5 feet from the !�orthGest (�.'l;) corner of said Lot 5, thence �orch paral]e 1 co and 350.4 feet {:est of the East line of said Auditor's Subdivision a distante of 570 feet, tlicnce Eas[ parallel [o [he 1:orth line of said Lot 5 a distance of 290.4 fee[ to the l:es[ right of aay line of Cen[ral Avenue, thence South along the lZes[ zigh[ of vay line of Central Avenue to [he point of beginning, thence [ermina[ing � Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned Discricc knoW�� PD (planned development districts) All thac part of Locs 4 and 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88 that is not rto�,� zoned C-2-S and except that part of Lot 17 osned by the City of Fridiey, and excep[ tha[ par[ described ' a5ove Is hereby designated to be in [he Zoned Distric[ known as � C-2-S (general shopping areas) SECI'IO\ 3. That the 2oning qdministrator is direc[ed to change the offitial zoning map [o sho� said [ract or area from Zoned Distric[ R-1 (single family dvellings) and C-2-S (general shopping aress) Co PD (planned developmen[ districts) and from R-I (single family dvellings) to C-2-S (General shopping areas) � All lying in the sou[heas[ Quarter (SE�) of the South�est Quarter (Sld�) of Section 13, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley County of Anoka, State of Pfinneso[a. P�SSED SY Tt� CITY-CO','\CIL OF THE CI1Y OF FRIDLY THIS STH DAY OF DECE:;EER, 1966. _ �,I` �,/c � f. �.�w„� / F'Y�� ` Jack 0. F:irkhar., .::.sz:� v � ` � �n�� _�� ---: c�s�__ ?ia,-'.'.., �, Drunseii �-`-'.ic 6earing; �..�c Feading : =`�^'d Feading; • =:ish. . . .. Koveabez 14, 1966 T�ovenber 21, 1966 Deceobez 5, 1966 DecemSer 14, 1966 1P I_�_: �, � 7 � T 7 c�= , -� vq ; ,., , . �`[ ..,,�� ^ . I __ �'ni . �. _ irw. __� ^o.�J . �.'1�' ..T Mli.r .W . �Q � � �, : . o , . � .�— — � /.�/ �7l1 G4 „ � Z/ ��` , Y :�/. . i � :,Q ` � .. I— i t._u•r�_ %: .�pu__ �� E�t �.c�rd c�rc� �+.,•. . ;F- �1V /\ e e� I ; eN � i , • . _ • � � , ` + /2 : '' � � ; `�2° � ` - Q.' a ' y" ' �n �,.: _: _ ��..�- `� F- V• _/R/1 . � . /i�:.F.. � `' � � � . � // / p %>' '�^�/p" �` V O ; Z ` '" ''''ti'• � � I<"/��.'-iL.6r ! ✓.! R ` y� , �- J � �' ' . • � t - . 1 'I � - ��R �� ` M , , ( -. /Jt" ""�J�u_ �V ,<��,�V�� `�, '�' • � ovrtos/ V� , 's ;r ' » , r' , � �ia .�� e > _��h,", • t � � : , . � y�/ � t / ? _ ,�..:�� _ R ../�.v1.. __. /fa1._ �^ �4�1� ,�-'�f _ �,[ ` � • � I , i� , ' e / \./ ; �ra ` �� `-. � ' �g ; % 6� � :;` `- /7 M 'G: 1 , O s � , : .. ; •• ��,.,, :� �;, j 6 �° �. ' � • ..• ; ' ' ..��`•. „e�.. � J,. Q �;. �..�.-..1... . •.....; .. ....... � ........... � I / ��Y�� i` • �/ Y/f �M� e II. 5 ' , � � ��' �G3 RQ: 1 q ...,; f,� ,.yu. /}�:.a•�-� �_ •.. ,,. F ... d.? .�? 6 � � ,/ '° ,� . �3hr, f-.,,��, �. ��_. . , , ; H%%% ; � I`�;. : -� - 'r,.�,., ` 5� . ��': �o � � ._ /..-�' ;' . - . :i' � � .: ro... �A � 3 ��, `a ' � ,��'„ � i �' y a �. y', ,; o. ,�:� �� "• -�. � �� l . — ..� I� 'Vi � . . �� ' . . • • h ��'i �.t �� , � � �� . �� ..- • ::;� �� +`U�� I �is '1 V. � � ..� :-� �` J I � � . I 'rT �j ooJ� i7'rrn �. . . � I �. iI 4 , ��.. . ` � . % / � i . / {yZ . i 1 / / i � ,�,` � JMS � ...�. \�.`�. ' : / . �.. \I I ' . ' ' . � .. _ _ _--- -- ---- -- � �C13D1VlS 0 � `' �zoo� � - ' ----- 6 0 � i `...� . P J , ~ , � ' Clrb✓//%irr✓� .�� I / i i�.� Z � /n/:J1: J/K I I � � . . w t ' -i I � � 'lj.8 aG. � , � � • f j •fVQ.88 'i � , I � . �. ,. . ", , i � I ' J,:: ; � 17 � ,. � � s� �.� �. ;�;-` �',, �: I . ..-� -i��R,., a.. � � / . . .. . , . lf�tll ��rs :.S ^e'b (j IO) I• ��..i '. .• �`_.� ,:, . �, \ � ,O�p �' `�� r %� 1: �� J-•< � ,_ . ; a�w:; _�,,�r� l;ti .. �� ' � . ��%��r�r Ci/.etii'I� ` Qh� u�fy .„ ' �� . _1 _O' �' -� � .J , W V �' , /fi/!. 1 D 7f <. .. � .. �nl ! `, �l iesrlal -'} � ... if/,L. �? (oir.�J S/�4 ORNER i - • _ , S C. /3 � � '-:� � Pu 6 zo �tF �rnrm AiTENT10M N DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY f�� 5T. PAUL DISiRICT, CORPS OF FJlGINEEPS ��\, 1173 US. i0570FFICE 1 CU5701A HOUSE (J t ST. VAUL, N�NNESOTA 63fOhit79 ( /l')a.y 29� I9a'�� p^, i� Construction-Operationa ' Regulatory Functione $7-iG29N-3O /�'!/Z , �Qu� �2 �e/s o/1 , �y � v 93�d L,�v�- N� %� /.4.� G� /Y).0 sS�l 3 �/ 1R Re: /�loa2E .L°.'�E LOMMONS. P�e�as4 �/4G6Me%✓r vF Fivt- M.OTE%L/AL iti A��p/�p{� /• O a GE o-ii IS ci�.a 7�C o� [s�[.7�/n n O�S in s E'e. �3, r 3o.UJ ��3 rv., �}no.E �.- eo., ,�,�. Wa have reviewed the information prwided us about your projec� The work is authorized by a nationvide Department of the Army permit, prwided the encloaed conditione and management practicea are followed. This determination cwere only the project referenced abwe. Should you change the design, location, or purpose of the vork, contact us to make eure a violation vould not occur. Our telephone number ie (612) 725-7557. It ia your responeibility to insure that the work complies with the terma of this letter and the enclosurea. PLEASE NOTE T1iAT THIS OONFIRMATION LETTER DOES NOT ELIMZNATE THE NEED FOR STATE, LOCAL. OR OTAER AUTHORIZATIONS If you hava any questiona. please call /Yfary %�a./>Y . Sincerely. �.tG Enclosure(s) �� p8t� (/ Chief. Regulatory Functiona Branch Conetruction-Operations Division Determinationp 330.5 �a��3 L, ` �Z. Nelson Engineering 1460 93rd Lane N.E. Blaine, MN 55434 Phone 612-784-7390 John Stine MN DNR ' \ . / Niemo � 1S Date: May 27, 1987 Subject: Moore Lake Commons � I have enclosed a preliminary grading and drainage plan for the proposed deve2apment just aorth of Moore Lake in Fridley. The plan is not finalized, however I expect you can review this.as is.to determine if a,permit is needed. . Call if you have any questions. Roger W. Nelson, P.E. C: Jerry Smith, COE 5 29�5� 0 �� -�r;,-_�� `��'� (v1AY c%; IJbi REGtON V1 WATERS '�" � � �- . _ � ��:�,�_ �� ` �v , ��v� -�° � ��'�' � 29�- �Sz 3 1T � - - -------� � � � .�': f :. ..._-= - --�-_-� -' -�-� _ , :, .- .; ;�_� ;�^� � r � -- _ , ✓ � i � .y � ` a,nm� e � �- �. ='` � \ / ' � \�°'. � ' R, ' : +_�� ! '°,/ I I i . 6,;, ' � ��' �/ :J �.� ' ' � . �_ , � �d �_� 'j' i• '_ .. ( s _ _ _ i -= � , "' -rff , _ '_. '-_ _._ �"` .� ;a_ ,//;:�'�>-��- ', ��6., ,,\ �_ � � . .... �... _ _...�/� ' �i)n. -.�i , . � � I `. , � i � V,•��. ��%�� ^ ��d' I oi ....�......... ' ` .J//'j '. �n ��, ;,�i - V FFE � I . ... .... / i /{ i . � BB8.1 . � " � - ! "�;�St .. a'� e8 � r(/ / I I I . �� . � . F ' ' f CT� I . � '�'�� ' B i l� � .t;'( � ` ;, . '` � -'� j� ; ._.... , � �'; j i' �%t� .�I ,' '! � ; � � - . , � , �l�:� B.' "., i�� -- '/� �� % `� � • . r�ciu� r�ue. r�enm roc xuii 8 ?� /• i-. : �, ''�y(' � Y-�,// ` : � ,��_ ��f � li ? Q �� 00 �� _" � i i. � FFE - �= _' ! � � . i � � A I � � i I � -� 890.5 ' I -+{� 3'/� ^, �'�• iFE �� .F ' fiE RelaJ� Ofi¢e �/�', I.�� B86 0� BBB.I I I � � ' �� _� .� . _ - --'`' Q � � � : � ... •' � . a' ' i � '� � � ,��.,.; � �'�J,� � � , � / �, � �� •1-��,�.' +�'v�� i � � �•, \` !� r �� '1' -�l :n� � .----- .. I �.�_-.. e9z5 /� /.�i.� ��i '{� I' II ✓ / I I1 � � � . I� � % �, _ J I I '.. .- e," . � I I / I '� � . - .J-� :�_n._. -_e:___/ � / I � �._ `�I � II' 1 - � � . . -� � k- _ � - . � _- Tyopie. Lake A cqueL Sw�T. � Heali� CNC � � � � i � � � o �-�--�--�� V I�I I %�� I i ll� / . -1 I I . 'I�b -� � �� i / t �_ 11�; � . i i � � - � � - i �. I . i I . �` i��! i / / � _ y °i'�, �� _ I� t Ti-� �i r i� �� l,� • � . i �:-- � �.. ' � i �. �` i / ; �/ . / . �! :. 2 p� . lr�ii�,, � _ . : �,� ,_,a , J t � �` � i ��..� F�,.�s�. � `, -,i 1 ,i, � ; ..; , ; � �- � - �� :� .��i +;; :� i � r1. ,_ � �'� an � . �f I Il 1!'.I' P i'Y * .� 1 4i-. � �i �' � '.�y �' � �a , � �� • D ` � r 'f� � y y � � � \ �, _. , i , �..ti = i � � ' �,.�� i i � � 4 , ! iu' , ,l � f �, , ; , . , � � ; , ,,; , I, , , ;,s ; ,, ,,. ��-- , _ �,,;;II e %% . /f I ., ' +..,. \ . ,f �.. _ ."�c.J-- =� ' �'��{ � \ (� , � ` � i�,I Il. . - �, t \' • � � iJj � �J ( —_ `` I V I � T / _ � - s' .� ' ♦ ��-\ � ,�7 l� i ��_ "-1' � . � � I �.� _ �� _ 4 .,,'�a-,, � y �, f; , ,, ,;},", � , , � �--� ----�-T� . , i, ��,' � '.,ii'i ��`1 ..�i :�� - s= - I_ � I ' llh� � - � � 1' 3�..�:�i - F -.-a I � ��l%maoc ieev+'�CO��nsl �(I1VI . ��I� ��jl,�;rc..� �, ,�,� ` �� . {� ' � ��j�i�i � � � ��y {`� � �``_ � i � '' 1'I I � 1 , h � 4 ,�- � /��/ � NWL B)52 " � �i�t / / .+ ' t �+I�1'I �� (f'__� - _ ..';�1__-�: / I11� '' k- � s.� ! IM1� � , n� se . Pom � i rl��h . .. --_��1�( , � ��i� _ _' x �/f� � �' �--�- � �a-� ~/�` � ..- l`- _'--� �:: ��'�t -.--�Jl+1i - �'C �'.,-c ,� � �•-._; - � - � � � : . 'MOOre LaYa �. � .'^atrltlaraMb+ -'_"' .' � I � �;.�"` OXP OMW B1).5 � � _ �� ' " 100 mr MWL BT8♦ S'.: 1 �M �,LYn 1 O� ORO Eb�ttly itlpNCr� 10�ii1� . Lo1e InN BT5.2 °�"� � `��-~---i - �•`�.'�� . , .�.�� .. _ DRAINAGE PLAN ' '� � n ' � i�('-��. . d I� 1 ��1�� : II� � I . �-� .i �, ; I�= :� �� Ililllllil�llfl�, 1'� ,;;�i iiili �� ia t ?—� � — — — !�? � � -� T � n� —�_ T � T a— _ __ _� — _ —_� � � •�— _ � _ _� i — — - T � `---�-� ��-� ;--' �'7 ''� ' r�3 � r—= £� � rt-- �— : — � — —r- ---r— — — T � � � z� = � �;��+ 1 ` � �— � \ i r� a �_ \�v i � � a —.— T —;.— �-� �' � O : ,--' �°;�� s �x ".. �... --_ _.� - — Ia " f .:�:r. 'o g r.:{:� i:::i I> -_ �t>tt.:r.pC��,,. » - �� i:!e� s 4 �t `-"'� . .�r�s` — 3:'7� _ O«R° K, -t �'Z:�S � "J..•:4 . _ .. . Q >�,�:_;`:�'r�1f ;:��.s f:q;:�� { t �`� , �� 1�-- N ;' � O ; T Pr 2 s m sm 19 xr C� n m � � n {9 t� �� ,�F ....,....,.. � D GENTflAL AVENUE nv�/nc u�nc nn�.�uw� SWIM & HEALTH CLUB I. � $ � G � �g 3 � n � u u m � ARCH:=_EC`5;1 II �� 1■ lU ... .�..1"'..ln[�LN+1J�!law� .ar:^�..�...�n�. .� . � .il. �aL,a � i F ..... .� .... . . . i.. � M11 l� V. � • � F - . • _ ' . p f� s a � - � R � O - E.j a i �y ,,,c� C'� 0 l� Q - 1'� . V ��I . I i I I I I I I I I I i =' O O;• O �� F: .... i _ , F� ' p � I i Q: a s E,,— � � �� Fl—S5j � � r-- - ..�.7_��. .I . e . t,— y '� � . j N� _ �� T � - . — T � � 'I � �',F: — �— -- �_ � '�,9 � t_ � _T � �� \ . . � ' ��T__ �_ � �_ : — � . q \� � �� ' _,.� Al� � _�_ � ' � �� '�3 li � _ "_' "�—. _�- \F'O ;� w Q`� � � ; � 6-� ,.�a :. � o � ' a' °-,:�— �- �- : � "-�i' f ` . . . - v✓, � � s. �' xn �c . _' _ � - � � . 'yO . .. _. � � � s � — -- — �— " . . _ ' '" —�'_ e • ` � Qa_ _ —._ — � •. ' ' _ � . \ .. �. + �� ' T— �__ �_ � �..C. . � ��' � _ 6 ' S �,�,! �� — _�_ _-.'— , � 1 . . . �w �t�1��v,P� •C� � � � � �LN 1"�'aF•/ . � .. i � S j ♦ .f �. :i a � � aZ � —s/z �' : ��.�r-e _ _ a ,r� s � _ _ t � l.� a :v. y ' � � . 7 � ..i:— ii'f Y � . :�� } 3 f � .. ... .. 3 v a . . . . . .. 8� Q � 'i— ' - i , �r°' �@ � � , �'"�Jr`��Q _ - � e _ , . �"..a�� '�>- E; . �`` E �� _� m � • l{ . � � � �m E i � � _ � ,.i'�- � p _ Q V' Y`� �' � � . . . � . �M � gapa]] �I(� ��3' ._. . . . . ''"___ � � I ' i � �,; 9 � `i ' � O�O (-m� � ��" U ��30 �4� � I- I� � r �r,� Q� 3� Op Q� 6 Or.:�f - Y.O . �,, o �\� y�',� ��Wy � � 3 .� �� Ni? � llili � T�^ � `^ � OlD CENTNAL AVENUE � � �4. .. MOORE LAKE RACOUET. p�� AnCH17E[iS, L7�. SWIM E HEALTH CLUB � t� . ""^"•^ IcP�UIEV.MiNNE50T�. . ._____"___ • •�• —•__ A In i---•_WL�W I � � �� I'' � • �I��' _" i I '.��'— ' ._�_'. '�',�— � I I 's ' Illlili ". '�� • � � i a � . � ' � � ��• � r� �I i m j � � �- -- T I�' l� � —'— ` �—' \ � j �-- T—+ I � T T _ T `� � _ - � � � �� `� • T � � � :g � � � --+ � ��-_T�_ � '� �__ � � - 1 �• � � \ o 'P ' ° �_ .\ o' � � o ie � ni' 'i_--i-___ _i " ii 2 `a"�:I rt i�r:e:� � � i.� Ei:z�y, ;,li;s�'�I : , •;:,�t ; :i:iEi�c .1i[ ':f ij'- `- I(I�;�� s :,l� �i'�?� ��i�ss;< < i �f � '�°t'-E {i:i:?�;� � :��? iF`i�i iS�i�?��li � �•._ r!.f��,� F��lF''�u �" °!i? pc n f rii �:•.; ifi'� le:�i�:�� G f. � pf:iE� SFi��"� . �. ; : �� -`�_ _ N �' f O ;a �m m� �m �9 � �� m, J . � 8 I o � o s i _ g � � �� 14! { -: nHEE� ni�t - Htvisior+s � MOOFiE LAKE FiAGC]UET� {� /�� ARCXITECTS, lT�. �` � - �� ; �E .°iir`.uWmi`�r"�i� SWIM & HEALTH CLUB �� rl■ •••.•••"•, °i s ' : ...�...�.,.... r.�.-.......� . Fli10LE1'. MMNESOTA d t i , - 1. � _. �;.. i , �� --� : _ _ - _ -� ��- , i '' 1 � —._ � . � � .. i i ly — _ I 1 � 1. — � � � I f . i Y �i i . � .— , � :' . . ��, �(� - � � � � ��. � ` ur I' S —�. ./ Y ' b \' • I - �: � I f� —� 1 i I � ! � I � � - . -�� -- � ; � -I � � , , ' �� — -- �� . ; �_� ( ; i I ; t — ' �' `_ � " ----` — - , a � ,'•, , i — ,. i � � ;��i " ? � \ I I, � ----, /�-- ' i I ; � � i �. � � . �. 7 I � — �-- ' � I 3 i� � i % � .. i� �� I . . : � L: ' � � �I�� Gs :� .. ' . I ' ' h1 o il � 1 �� , �� • , � � I � ��i ` '__ ,_ . �-- ------- — ' _' % i i � �� i/ � =! � '-- ! ' — � i `—_ � �-- — = � :: �,� ,� �_ , �� ! , ; � z��. �.-,:: °' � L—' � �� ' `� � -- - \ I �� _ ��, ti9<� . 1 j � � . , �. _ / � � \ i� � ; � I t-,; ' - . = , �— i ', :� � / � , _._ i:- ��` _ � . , ._ _ ..� , � . / .. ' _ , �� , � !� . .. � _ � i-1 �- -�- , t- -I �� , ' - . '� i �+'� ' . ' � � I V / � ---- � - �-- i� �— � —�_: � ��--_ � / _ _, s, _ , �y . - �—� �r�_ _ __. _-- _ —__. —'_ .�_.�._.. .a -+ . .'M1 .�._. _ � _� _..—�._ . AOORE LAKE qAC�UET SWIM & HEALTH CLUB FRIDLEY, MINNES TA �11 R1S � AflCMREC+S; L YO O19 1X l� �C •v i - i- - -� - �- ; --t--- + � , ♦ � 7 :; :_ :� �S I i �'•S !,._� :� - -- lY � , ; . t F � _�] II ! ' • I I i :� 1: i ' e� ` e � � Ll.�� E_. . : S •F I `i �o� _"._ _'___ ._ i: - -- � � � �� _ _ i � r � , _— — I E i __°s. ; c 3 ; I`--'� I I � — i� �— _ - — — _ � � �I s� t S i I _� i —u��r�.� _._ _ _— lr1Ll�... __ .m ..�jr,�. ... j __' IL� � . � ..-r ._'_—.__" -_____--_ I_ AOORE LAKE AAC�UET SWIM & HEALTH CLUB _ FRIpLEY. MINNE OTA_ i + I 1 li I i � � � 11RCMITECTS, LT� � �n � O � i t � •urncw �m � N m m i � p � � F%t RI 2y 1 i t � ae �. IN 10 IC y i� m i 10 1 �� 6: �!� "I�� (� f �Ry � rr � I �I � � £1; � MOORE LAKE RAC�UET,� SWIM & HEALTH CLUB � a* C � i 2 R 3�i �m dIN y � �m � ' 2 '� � 1Z �u/� Q AflCM_ I_TEMS `� L^T ■� �1� �■ � o I � ;� ' 9 t I i �' I. i i i\ lAA - - �f�/�d 'h�dlrta'J r ,, - ,��" - - . � -Si . `�� ' � , o �N � � �� '9� r , � � �� . �� a� ' a�` i � �, < _�__ ____ � % / -� \ � . ��c! r� '+ $ �"� r - �. � � � i - , .-' �' - _t � \ �fi � � . . . - / 3� � � I . . � 3� -: i i i � ' � J �I 2 y� � (� � I I � � �I I .` � i� J 4�S � i' � i i /;d . �� ;�' � I � � 3 �� ..�\\ I �.s �c ' �� Q � � _ •\ ` : r`:, : . " . \�. .\ . ' . . . �\�`\\ ` / . . .. \ � ` ' \ ' ` : � \� �.i_ COMMERCIAL CENTER ' i ' � COMMERCIAL CENTER .. ., �: � ARCHIT��TS, LTD. _ � _3 ' 612-544•8368 6311 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 240 S!. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 TRAFFIC STUDY In an effort to estimate the vehicle trips per day that would be generated at the proposed "Crosstown Racquet, Swir� and Heal[h Club", we obtained information on nembership use for the past year at Chree of Normandale Tennis Clubs, Inc. existing clubs. The three clubs used in [his study are: Burnsville, 98th Street and Normandale Racquet Swin and Health Clubs; they are of sinilar size and locatiot� to the club being proposed. The chart below indicates the approxina[e nur�ber of people entering the club in an average monih and day along with Che maximum per day. Burns. 98th Norr,:. MOI�THLY 31,000 24,000 20,000 PEP. DAY 900 650 600 MAX. PER DAY 1200 900 aoo Based on this infornation, we would anticipate 750-900 cars per day and therefore 1500-1II00 vet�icle trips over an 18 hc.ur business day. TRAFFIC STUDY 1CC * * * � * -v n z o` O � � O � � m n m n fn Z e� � m ci z f s a n n V � O � C 3 O lD � O fi r4 y� Z 9� C O h M N ct i w o a � � a. n rr c o v� � I � � N C O I a F N � M � � � I 'q � i w N � I � c v c i � N m a o � N N O M M � m 0 Z 2 .� c� � z °n o o � � � c o 0 � vyi °n = z m = a cZi� n = m o m tn � -�n1 � � � o m � �--. * � z a rrn m o � � � * � z rn o m m � -� �F f., r r+ r-� n--I W O] V �D (T W 01 1--� l0 W lD O T N �' W Ol �.�� C Z .V 2 --I � N N A A W O � � � r c� r .o c m � � rv n <n 0 0 C C -i N �n x N N N 1--` N N 2 G7 < * N 3 * � 1 3 �v x x x x x x v 0 O r x x x x x x x z x x x x x x x x x x x x x x H r c � nT r .-. n� Vi Z N fTl N � --1 cJ z o n � � � z c'� A W N W N N A "9 �--' �--� (n .A W Ol A � v O A ➢ A V (T V Ci N i0 r A V Ul A �F %� 7� .'} H Z � . �-+ F-� 1-+ I--� N TI (n W (ll (.Jl W (T W � V l0 O ' f*l!J O A V W I--� O 01 O Ol V f*1 C -1 n � O O W V Ol OJ W �--' I--' .'a � O O O O O � cn �D N m A v N �--� O O r+ � N �-' ' N N � D � A W O W t0 N W W Ol �-+ t-+ r-y 7C � N N O O W O � cn cn O� i � Z �� O O O N PARKING ANALYSIS � � t� m 1 m z z .-. N C1 r C W N � z c� � n � � .. < N l�D ,' ' _' +4 aiII�f' ,� ' s Y e . ., . . . . < < � CITY��OF FRIDLEY � , > ,,, ,..�: �,� �,�r ,�� : _ � 6431 UNIVERSiTY AVE N Ee" %� FRlDLEY� MN ssaa2 SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #8��3 (6�1�2)571-3450 _ � �� M , � r� � , ,; _ . . i , :- � � � ,�' � � � � �_ SPECIAL USE PEI2PlIT,iEE ��' ^ RE(EIPl' # fI �SS PEI '- SQiET.()LID PLAPINIIIG QJD�Ii SSION iP�EE"PIlV�i DATE: 6�� /$� , �r� . . � �. � . . �''' : 9(2if17ULID CITY Q�[JNCII, MEETING LlATE: r _. ; ' ; . ;, . : . e., : . , � PROPE�RTY INFGRMATION �„- ' � ' � � � _ ; , , -• , ,v :-. '� rRO�x� �w�fss _ _ _ � I,�AL DESQ2IPPION: LO!t' � t ffig(R TRACP/ADDITION `(�`�--� J-� �9� PRFSII�T 2flNING Ty� AQ2EF�E SPECIAL USE PERI�fIT BEING APH.IED FDR: ��mJ � CO��On of a parking lot in the �1 Floodw•av. ,,, , ,, . , : _ SECPION �' 44i£ OJDE: 205.24.4.B2. " ' * • ,� * ,t * �e * * * * * * * * * * * s s � � t * * * * * * * * * * * * � * * * * � t FEE OWNER INFORMATION . ... _ . . Np�,� St:' Anthony Vitlage Shopping Centers pHa�E � 379 2028 � -ypp��g 25 University ve. S.E. Mpis. MN 55414 sicr�c�xs � � �a.�w- nA� S -a7-S? ,�� ' ��°*e�t* C*o* xa* * * * *s�r*;,rF*e ��r�i'��its �e°�,��CiS�r*�i $"��ts�i`�� * * * • PETIT �rit�y►' � c�!�Q N � — � Rvd oc c�+-�3_ 2Wt� �aas � 1., ��— � t�b � Aot�ss 2Z : . �..J� �Z'�.� S^ r�,,� L, /�'� a✓ Ss�� 3 sici�ciii� n�,� ��/ �� f � *-�-,�,��`***�***.**«�,�**,�*** **`*:*'*:*-:*****.** � , ��.. _ x.��c a�ru�rssr,oH: r.pxiam n�� n�Te cz�r 000NCa.: ��wm nEar� n�� SPIFtJLATmNS: � z. ., .. - ; . P.T:I x�sisc x�u�c BEEC)RE 'IIiE PLAN[1ING OJN@ffSSION Notice is hezeby given �that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Fridle� in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Wec�esday, Jime 24, 198'7 in the Co�mcil Chanber at 7:30 p. m. for the purpose of : Consic3eration of a Special Use Permit, SP #87-13, by Brody Associates, Inc. per Section 205.24.4, B, 2 of the Fsidley City Code, to allow the grading and construction of a parlsing lot in the CRP-:L Floodaay, � all that part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, �30, R-24, described as follows: Commencing at the most southerly oorner of Moore ' Lake Highlands, First Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota; thence in a southwesterly direction at zight angles to the sonth right of way line of 63td Avenue N.E, as originally platted of said bloore Lake Highlands, First Addition, a distance of 175 feet; thence i.n a suutheasterly direction at right angles to the line just described along a line parallel to said south right of way lirie of 63rd Avenue N.E. of said Moore Lake Highlands, First Acidition, eYtended, a distance of 169.75 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence in a northwesterly direction along the line just described, a distance of 494.25 f'eet;: thence in a westerly direction at a deflection angle to the left 22 degrees, 20 minutes, a distance of 309 feet; thence in a southwesterly direction at a deflection angle to the left of 77 degrees, 22 minutes to a point of intersection with the south line of said Section 13, thence Easterly along the said south line to a point 625 feet west of the south Quartec corner of said Section 13; thence in a northerly direction to the actual point of beginning containing 21 acres, more or less, accoraing to goverrment survEy; except therefrom the following tracts: Tra t; All that Fart of Lots 16 and 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88 or that part of the Southwest Quarter of` Section 13, R� 30, I�24, Anoka Coimty, Minr�esota, described as tollows: Beginning at the intersection of the southeasterly right of way line of State Highway No. 65 and the sauth lire of said Southwest Quarter of Section 13; thence east along the south line of said Southwest Quarter for a distance of 232.0 feet to a point, said point being 1294.80 feet, more or less, west of south Quarter corner of said Section 13; thence noctti at right angles to the last described line for a distance of 285.54 feet; thence northwesterly with a deflection anqle to the left at 78 degrees 54 minutes 09 seconds for. a distance of 163.61 feet, more or less, to the said southeasterly right of way line; thence southwesterly along said southeasterly zight of way to the point. of begi.nning. Subject to a 30 foot wide easement for road purposes _ along the northwesterly side. Tra t: All that g3rt of Lots 16 and 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88 lying between the east right of way line of State Highway t3�. 65 and a point oc line 30 feet east of said cight of way of St.z�te TL�mk Hi�way i3o. 65 and south of the south lot line of Lot 8, Block 2, Nbore Lake Efighlands 3rd Addition and north of that g3rt of Lots 16 and 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88 previously deecied to the City of Fridley and described as gsccel 1820, Auditoc's Subdivision No. 88, �rcel ntaol�et 1820 being further described as, all that prt of Lot:; 16 and 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88 or that part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, T-30, R-24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follaws: Beginning at the intersection of the southeasterly cight of way line u� State Highway No. 65 and the �uth line of said Southwest Qu�rter of Section 13, thence east along tke south line of said Southwest Quarter for a distance of 232.0 feet to a point, said point being 1294.80 feet, more or less, west of south Quarter corner of said Section 13; thence north at ri�t angle to the last described line for a distance of 285.54 feet; thence northwesterly with a deflection angle to the left of 78 degrees, 54 minutes, 09 seconds fcr a distance of 163.61 feet, more or less, to the said southeasterly right of way line; thence southwesterly along said southeasterly right of way to the point of beginning. SP #87-13 Btody Associates, Inc. Page 2 Tr t: That part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, T-30, R-24, lying east of a line draan 30 feet east of the easterly line of State Highway Ivo. 65, as the same is now laid out and constructed, and south of the south line of Moore Lake Highlands 3rd Addition and the same extended easterly, and lying north of the following desccibed tract: that g3rt of Govermment Lots 1 and 2, Section 13, T-30, R-24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying 33.0 feet on each side of the following described centez line: Commencing at the northeast oorrer of said Gwerrunent Lot 2, Section 13, T-30, R-24; thence west along the� north line theceof 238.81 feet; thence to the left on a t--angential cuxve having a radius 230.0 feet and a delta angle of 59 degtees 24 minutes a distance of 238.45 fe�t; thence southeasteily tangent to said curve 527.71 feet; thence to tl�e xight along a tangential curve having a radius of 230.0 feet and delta angle of 62 degrees, 16 minutes, 40 sewnds a distance of 250.0 feet; thence westerly tangent to said curve 423.78 feet; more or less, to the easterly lire of State Highway No. 65 as the same is now laid out and constructed, being a part of Lots 16 and 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. S8, Anoka Cotmty, Minnesota. T a t : That fart of Lots 16 and 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88, also being part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, 7�30, 1�-24, Anoka County, Nlinnesota described as follaas: Beginning at a point on the south line of said Southwest Quarter, distant 232.00 feet east of the intersection of the southeasterly riqht of way line of State Highway No. 65 and the said south line; thence north, at a zight angle to said south line, 285.54 feet; thence east, Farallel with the said south lu�e, 156.81 feet; thence south 284.54 feet to a point on the said south line, distant 156.81 feet east of the point of beginning; thence west, along said south line to the point of beginning. Being registered land as is evidenced tr� Certificate of Tit1e No. 32398. Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88; all that g3rt of Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the following described 1ine: Corrmencing at the south Quarter oorner of Secti� 13. �30, R-24; thence westerly aZong the south line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section, 625 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be hereby described; thence northerly a distance of 974 feet, more or less, to tt�e southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 2, Moore Lake Highlands 3rd Addition; thence northeasterly along the southeasterly line of Nbore Lake Highlands 3rd Addition, 241 feet to the northeasterly line of 63rd Avenue N.E.; thence northwesterly along said northeasterly line of said 63rd Avenue N.E. 151.95 feet to the southeasterly line of N�oore Lake lst Addition to the north line of said Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88, and there terminating. Subject to portions taken for Nbote Lake Road and Old Central Avenue and easements of record, if any. Generally located south of West Nnore Lake Drive, east of Highway 65, notth of Moore Lake and west of Central Avenue. My and all persons �esiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and glace. SPEVE BII,LINGS Q�AIItNFiN H,At�NNING O�NR�IISSION Publish: Jtme S, 1987 J�e 15, 1987 : SAV #8�-�5 SP #87-13 P.S. #87-06 St. Anthony Village MAILII� LIST Planning 6/11/87 Council St. Anthony Village Shopping Center Vin3i1 Brenney Frank Walters 25 University Avenue Southeast 6187 Heather Circle N.E. 12482 Pomerado Court Minneapolis, MN 55414 Fridley, MN 55432 San Diego, CA 92128 Shorewo�d P1aza Partners Jeanne t4ehlhoff 2233 North Hamline Avenue, Suite 220 6170 Heather Place N.E St. Paul, MN 55113 Fridley, b'IN 55432 George Skinner 6217 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Bonnie Fater 6096 bvoocl�� Lane N.E. Fridley, Nli1 55432 Clinton Stran3 6122 Fboc:y Lane N.�. Fridley, PR�I 55432 Clair Liabraaten 6128 Y7oocly Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Frank DeMello 6134 Vx�ody Lane N.E. Friflley, MN 55432 Isabelle Jordal 6133 woody Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Loren Adolphson 6131 itibody Lane N.E. Fridley, 1�7 55432 vdalter Rydberg 6127 V�body Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 William Gagner 6125 kbo3y I.ane N.E. Fridley� MN 55432 Wayne Welch 6115 Woody Lane N.E. Fridley, NIN 55432 Jeffrey Saarela 6249 Ben More Drive N.E. Fridley, D�7 55432 Brickner Builders 6249 Ben Alore Drive N.E Fridley, MN 55932 2c Douglas Tanner 2206 St. Anthony Boulevard Minneapolis, i�I 55418 Douglas Tanner 6355 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 2�fark Bue Douglas Tanner 6229 Central Avenue N.E. 6357 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, NL�I 55432 Fridley, P�1 55432 Dorothy bliles Mark Clasen 1370 Rice Creek Foad N.E. 5332 P,aym�rxi Avenue Fridley, rR�l 55432 Tloundsvieca, NIN 55112 Jeffrey Geldert Mark Clasen 6291 Central Avenue N.E. 6345 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Gregory Stenhoff Robert Shimanski 6283 Central Avenue N.E. 6335 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Richard Hartfiel Robert Shiuoanski 6271 Central Avenue N.E. 7458 Hayes Street N.E. Fridley, t'AI 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Harold Morgan ti�'a}�ne Larson 6245 Central Avenue N.E. 1216 Banfill Circle Fridley, Mtd 55432 Brooklyn Park, MN 55444 Richard Mochinski Wayne Larson 7256 E Con¢nerce Circle N.E.6325 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, DII�7 55432 Fridley, MI� 55432 Rice Creek Properties Resident 1315 Ric� Creek Road N.E. 6327 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, P�II�I 55432 Fortune Investments 4611 E 36th Street Minneapolis, MN 55406 Ziebart of Pfinnesota 6300 Central Avenue N.E Fridley, MN 55432 Resident 6315 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, I+L'V 55432 Plitchell Gwiazdon 6350 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, P'IIv 55432 sAV #a�-os SP #87-13 P.S. #87-06 St. Anthony Village PAGE 2 Beatrice Iaubach 6336 Pierce Street N.E. _ Fridley, P'IN 55432 Henry Peterson 6312 Pierce Stseet N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 D7arve1 McNaughton 6300 Pierce Stn�et N.E. Fridley, P�II�7 55432 William Hauan 6301 Dellwoocl Drive N.E. Fridley, P'A7 55432 John Keller 6315 Dellwoad Drive N.E. Fridley, PID1 55432 Richard Ficocello 6329 Dellwood Drive N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Eugene Ouellette 6343 Dellwood Drive N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Teriy Dalzen 6308 Dellwood Drive N.E. Fridley, f•IN SSA32 D7artin Buitlitt 1055 - 63rd Avenue N.E. Fridley, A'A1 55432 Daniel Nelson 6080 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Daniel Nelson 6070 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 ThaNis Gray 6062 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Carl Wi� 6044 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, NIN 55432 James Reiland 6068 Woody Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mark Wi]ke 6063 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Leslie Wilke 6061 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, t�I 55432 Ilarold Saanson 6064 Woody Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Kazimierz Tomczyk 6060 hbocly Lane N.E. Fridley, f�t 55432 LAargaret Nelson 6090 Woody Lane N.E. Fridley, NIN 55432 �erett- Utter 6084 [�body Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Harold Lind 6076 Woody Lane N.E. Fridley, r�l 55432 Kenneth Taylor 6065 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Shorewood Inn 6161 Highway 65 N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Resident 6280 Highway 65 N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Skyline Vet 6220 Highway 65 N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 D1ore Lake Funeral Chapel 6210 Highway 65 N.E. Fridley, MC7 55432 Wallace Miller 831 - 4Dth Avenue N.E. Diinneapolis, PTi 55421 ��'S StQre 6199 Highway 65 N.E. Fridley, D'II�7 55432 2D St. Phillips Church 6180 Highway 65 N.E. Fridley, DtN 55432 Resident 6289 Highway 65 N.E. Fridley, D'IN 55932 Richard Moen 1128 - 63rd Avenue N.E. Fridley, PIIV 55432 Edward Koxaal 1114 - 63zd Avenue N.E. Fridley, A'II�7 55432 Fridley Church of Christ 1100 - 63rd Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 John Bergstrom 1086 - 63rd Avenue N.E. Fridley, D'IlV 55432 t4ary Timm 1072 - 63rd Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Gary Pierce Star Route 9, Box 152 Bismark, AID 58501 Scott Kohanke 6116 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Shorewood Plaza Shopping 6225 Highway 65 N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 � o� � �„�,� � �1 ;� � � �'� �e"�4';'+ ►r'i ii �� ' * �� M�� , •� • • �_��_p:= � �' 1 � � i ` �' �.,��' . y� � • � � � �:.� � � � � S � � � � � • i� ♦ � • � " � ii: � 1 � . 7;�_�� iii �.. ,s� . . : • . . __: . ` �1 ., ' = : " =i! :: � �•• .•.-.-•-. . � • .: . , ♦ ♦��• , • ..•r - . .. ��,� ♦ t � � ♦ {. * � se�•»lsii:� �� `� /� ��._.� � �' � .. �� `��i�i�i�i! ;l1+7�' , !e � •« � ♦ ♦�� - • �i`�*�� uu - �r_..�.��. . . 40�• � ��f':� 0 ru.�a ��i�4��i f �'�A�� i i � � , �,'��j a �� n► � � i i�� 1 .�j�.�.�♦ � f 4�F�`�♦�♦� �� ♦ ♦�� '�♦ � v4��• I I• A� .�� • �� ♦��1�►� 4M1�� •��. ��,i.�� `��1� t�•��?t ♦��• ) ♦a4��'� �O�I�� ►��f• ♦��• , ♦��,1� •��•►� a�� ,y i,1�I��.�.�� . � � �. .�� _�a � �.y�.i�� '� �'��.` �7��i�♦ r.�a• L'�� ;�� • � .,.,.,.,:,.;.;.�.e�.°a .❖.• ��` . +�� ,.• ��, ♦��, •��• � � ,r � � ��a.. •��• �,: . � , �.�� •..►�•��• 0�4�� i�i�i�i�i :�'�i�i�i�•�•►�i�i�i�i • ' j'•"•'•'"••'°• •''•'•''"�'''''''' av�v� �r��r�i�,i1C�1�46�1��♦ �� ". V��1�� 1C'j�� 0��1��!''�'n � '��a•��i��ii � -� � v��.��•►.�� •►��♦ � rQ:.r � �.��_�_�� rr•�� 1 �' ' � � � -�� '� � . - �j� .: � !�►m � •� �� I � :.� , ,,:� �... .,. r • : � . . , �, ,� '`�.► , � ,� • - .. , �• , . � _ . ' �� ., �'' � �- - � va �°P, �o � . , .00 �� o i � . . . ��-o� � �.:� ,� .o .. .,, . .� .,�- .�� , � � � _v�- �� , -;.n �� • � � e � � �, - - � � � +: �,-� �� ,�� j"' i ��• � � �l � �. ! � :. ,T � � � � `tl.� ,0 8AD0 � � 2F I P � � ° �A (�h ; -� ��', � � � (i�) , , w • �.�L KE¢ � ; � � � ° � �. P � � QL l*�� 5 �,� � � p� ��`1 0� 1 ��1�'i ^� .ver..�s-�.»: � � m°� ^' ^ N , � e . � r � � V I� , r j � 0 �> : � 3(''� n � �'. �J+O _ _"",� . � ��/� �I'71 • n° [��a �� i{��p Fr � ; �Z . ,v /Y �,M/ � V e i �$�3 ; i. .nc.e , � � 5e�� ; : • E � „� ' A � �+b, o �, o ° i� o¢ t E �; �s 7r 7s m L / � p:e (,m, �{� � - (� .- �c . .�oa ' q � - ;�.e R S r � �,�y � g l�l o e (S`� s„�, t�� .� w Y �: : � j °.n ,..�' , `; �nsJ �S�) �4 : w T, . ��3. /(er � � ,S; � O /�) /N `. QO � -�w�,:n�iw-w:-''r rYe�� ` `x �� l' 1'�1� . � '__1___ '— n"��--�.� �p _ 'y i � . . � . ; Wi vV� 11V� _'__`t,\______ ��i _ . � r.M�N -_ i ^ s: �p� � L�I � �'��..-. �. � r1�5 r f�, ilor hh .^I'/ y:f �Jl� \ .-- � (/� �j A`r a • / � J ye� �' � i '^, � 8 6 �,,, f .9 r ,�� // , � � _ 1 � � �yfO/� i lS� � K ,r (/� / lp �.�.� / . ��N � �a i� � , // �li .. �'__' .- 'a ..- : , � 1 � . ,o,_ AD .3 �, r» ,e � o � � °,.�s •,,,, � / Z a� jn 5 , �- � / . , � � � ". - - v � E ' � � ':6 '� ' ! ^ ',� ! � � i0 av �f� i ... — �� ,�ry° I AUDITORS � � ,� �`�,. , _ ° � �q� � � � � � � (z�� 4 8 iiz� ; ;'1 � , 4 �. y4� � . • .r.o. 1 •-� ,� , : / - �n ,�� R=* ; . �•., h� ._ � � � „'1.�----(� 1[ _ '. . ;< �z000J � '/ � ..'�'%"Fl.vaD PCAiN B�ASED � '��+' �;::;> r'! ,' hF 9 � y�y � Cs�f� %�>�ven�e ` ' ' � � 55 T � /n, ✓CJfO�J /AC � �i i � ' ` � /� �� I; �� t� , , � SUBD. �-�lQ.88 j , I � `� � , ;�. � �, ; / � , � � . �J6/a � �i .�J� 'S �-ti �i _ P I L4f•fE. 1 / + . , _<.r��e 'n. : I Cq . o� ... �� . � �5 0�. ; (.v�o� : . ; � r car ar `. ; � �/g� O� � +D _ �`i ,_�� I i �dHr , 66 s�F^ �� a C.Yroliii✓ • . (y�io) �� r+� : ih � /I \ — �� i 6 y •. .,� O Q Q h � . /\ I�� L � \ �T� \/ .I _ ' , Moo�c J �„ a iCr! 111! r.i - io.rrr<.� (vuo�) $/ 4 � Cd1RRENT Fl.�ooG ttJ,s c. B��Y w�tT � OCATION MAP � � � �i�i�'��, � . �.i `� � �, � j ' x i` ; � r ��.�� ST �4�� .� .. � • � �: � �i17�t' � �_$ ' � � �. � � �: ; � � �� ,; ti � Y.„ � I�a ! �� ' ` � � A '�i �: ' . :}� . �'� - w� r � r� �! '� J i �� 1w e :� , �f1 �� ' • ~ � `� �� 7 Ee <"! .. �x . � �• . ,�+" ;.,� ry ..i s. � 4 ., " � � r } _ '+ i . ^ ��Y �/��\:.5.�' I�Y � , �y � � f.� •` _ t �� ,r.,..,,ar, �,�. � . . - .., .._ , :'.,. � � �" $.';�q�n�'`> x � b6'��"` s;: y *'� _ �. " y'q' �`»= lf. l:/: / � . � . T T„ 1,,.�f�71JI'f:/T7i�� . i �.� ' � � ,� , � . ry . �1� '�� A x �q � � � � � r �' , �.'. �, �y � 1� - . t '� . � .:� i�; : r f �► �� ;. I j Nii I I i� +.- °" 'F" t � � ��,� , '.Y � �,v • j . .-, k'i. � � R� � }�� . : r :'+�, e� 3 �'' t • �, gf" < ' � • . 7 .� �f !1 'r' .+�,� .•�-��.��.. .-� M� J� * f �-.`i� _ . Ara�' ��:'T;�, : yy 'Y ' o .,�C 4.�, ��`LG,; �..s �� t .��' ` �`' � ' �� *� i„� 1. • , �, � 4 �� , � .: 4r ' { '- ' � y�ei�eark._ � - , �_ � � ! fyiP� T {��( 1..�. J%'lt P �✓T�Q J p.. � q,•ro i ��'� � � 7 . i �� i, . s i � _ �X��4�/ � . �- � ' . �� ' ��. . �� i. A��` � �^ `� � . ,� ' ' t� , F . �;. •sa i ,i� , r x , .,r f k}, .��,f . . �n.• ' � ' a • � � � - 4J�'S'4.�. �, t..:. ; ` . .� ' +� '� "r,r„ �''�� . �� ' +��b � � r � �' �� x,pl.�r1 f l�%�rj� '�. � : . , ��!/L�� ' .�i"1 «� \ } M. � � / � "� i � ✓� h �'�. � 1 S � 1 � �( i � � � ''�_ ` � ± et. ..; t n� �.. � i �M .- - S_ � , ��.y' . � ` �x�'4' a,�, 1, •��y, ,r � 4 n � `,� t..Y ' • . �7 �- ; ��' i i ,�� .. .rr � � dl z ` �i y�� 2 �` � t .r ti ' �J� X�+ • t}� .�l' � � 4" . . -�� C �� • �� i !\ ` -? ) �y.,4 �� - ��' � I . � ; , � ,�15- N' h 3 �� { . Y� %i ��' f, � \ �r T � � . �� . '9`,,� ♦. h r 1 '� , :t� � R .b � � . , �` '�; �'i � � �i�'�� '�` ` ` �"i` K..'S: � . , yt. .�.�t «, €',y �"^� s �_ , d � , �s � ,�,� - ► �� +j�. 1 'iV! i, r � - a >' ]� r .. � ud.. . .:.Y � . r� �"_ . F, -. "�r.l°e " � y .��i'" '�ar.�.� .; �. DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHY - C: i,- _ _ _- - - ----- --__ __ — --- - - _ _ C17Y OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIOLEY, MN 55432 (612)577-3450 REZONING REQUEST ZOA f 3 VACATtON REQUEST SAV ,F��-Q� PLATTING REQUEST P.S. # R$1,UEST FEE y� PARP FEE RECEIPP A`�� ol � S�3i�ilLID PLANNING Q�DII;ISSION MEETING I1L.TE Z SQiIDULID CITY NUNCIL tfEETING I�.TE PROPERTY INFORMATION ..�.�. . ��. �, I�AL DES(RIPPION: � ••�.a • i BIqCiC Tf2AGT/ADDITIIki � L • :� �� - REASON EUR R�UFSP: A site glan sha+ring the proposed future use is re3uired for all �L oGici /'�'" �%l � 7'O S'r i�= ri�T�-d � i�'C—��i__ *********,t�****�***,r*�************,t***********r***,t********,r****,t**�**:**�r******r�,t FEE OWNER INFORMATION rIAME {please print) •��•o. SIGN�URE IIi1TE Note to Contract Purchase��s�;* ***��s*�u�s�*�s��*��********�********Q **,t**,t*�,t*,t**,t**�*,t*,t*,tt* � *St***,t****t PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME (Please prirc�) � %10�V �}SSoCi�}ZS PIIONE # 1n.3� � `F��^ r��s.s �z33 . �rh ..� � 2�se.0 : �I /1��-, � � �, � SIG2�'iURE '` II'�.TE � / �' I �� **�*:*:*****,c*�***,c***,r***********************•. 4 PLANNING W[�IIffSSION : APPROJID DIIdIED QTY QJUNCII.: STIAJL�ATIONS: ***********�***�****************x* �: Y ,-';;• o-� �a �r. �• �, w� UTYOf FR{DLEY 3r CIVICCENTER •(r131 GNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRfDLEl', A1INNFSOTA 5533' • PHONE (61?157I-345p Jime 9 , 1987 'IU WHOM TT iY�.Y �NCERN: The City of Fridley Planning Commission will be holding an informal hearing on a ca�uest foz a Vacation, SAV #87-05, by Bzody Associatess, Inc., to vacate all that �rt of Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 88, being that �rt of the Southwest Qu3rter of Section 13, 7�-30, R-24, Anoka County, Minnesota, crescribed as follows: Beginning at a point in the Southwestezly line of Lot 1, Block 2, Moore Lake Highlands 3rd Addition, distant 30.0 feet Northwesterly of the Southeast correr of said Lot 1, thence Southeastezly to said Southeast corner; thence South to a point in the South line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 13, distant 625.0 feet West of the South quacter mrner of said Section; thence West along the South line thereof a distance of 250.0 feet; thence North at right angles to the last described line a distance of 100.0 feet; thence East and g3rallel to said South line a distance of 150.0 feet; thence tYortheasterly a distance of 886.81 feet, more or less, to the Fnint of beginnino, generally located south of West Moore Lake Drive, east of Highway 65, north of Moore Lake and west of Central Avenue. Anyone who wishes to be heard shall be given the opport�mity at the Planning Cormnission meeting on We�esday, Jime 29, 1987 in the Council Chanber of City Hall at 6931 University Avenue N.E. at 7:30 p.m. STEUE BILLINGS QiAIRNg1N PLANN]NG QJi+1h1ISSION sr�v as7-os SP �87-13 P.S. �87-06 MAII�IDIG LIS'P Planning 6/11/87 St. Anthony Village Council St. Anthony Village Shopping Center Virgil Brenney Frank Walters 25 University Avenue Southeast 6187 Heather Circle N.E. 12482 Parierado Court rlinneapolis, Div 55414 Fridley, MN 55432 San Diego, CA 92128 Shorewood Plaza Partrers Jearu�e tdehlhoff 2233 ivorth Hamline Avenue, Suite 220 6170 Heathes Place N.E St. Paul, NII�I 55113 Fridley, t•'A7 55432 George SY.inner 6217 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, D'�7 55932 Bonnie Fater 6096 [�bod,� Lane N.E. Fridley, NL: 55432 Clinton Stran3 6122 t�ba]y Lane N.�. Fridley, DiN 55432 Clair Liabraaten 6128 War1y Lane N.E. Fridley, P'Cv 55432 Franl: Da�lello 6139 S�body Lane N.E. Fridle}�, DC� 55432 Isabelle Josdal 6133 Abody Lane ^:.E. Fridley, D'1N 55432 Loren Adolphson 6131 5�� Lane N.E. Fridley, D'�] 55432 t•,'alter Rydbe�g 6127 Nbody Lane I..E. Fridley, NL� 55432 t4illiam Gagner 6125 hbody Iane N.E. Fridley,-A'L� 55432 Wa�me �lch 6115 T�7oociy Lane N.E. Fricle}�, Diti 55432 Jeffrey Saarela 6249 Hen Diore Drive N.E. Fridley, DS: 55932 Brickner Builders 6299 Ben Aiore Drive N.E. Fridley, MN 55932 : Douglas Tanner 2206 St. Anthony Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55418 Douglas Tanner 6355 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, NiD1 55432 Mark Bue Douglas Tanner 6229 Central Avenue N.E. 6357 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, rII�7 55432 Dorothy Miles Mark Clasen 1370 Rice Creek Poad N.E. 5332 Faymond AvenUe Fridley, NII�7 55932 D7oundsview, MN 55112 Jeffrey Geldert Mark Clasen 6291 Central Avenue N.E. 6345 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, NL'�` 55432 Gregory Stenhoff Robert Shimansl:i 6283 Central Avenue N.E. 6335 Pierce Street h.E. Fridley, NL'v 55432 Fridley, Mt� 55432 Richard Hartfiel Rd�ert Shiman5ki 6271 Central Avenue N.E. 7458 Hayes Street h.E. Fridley, t�: 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 Harold Morgan S4ayne Larson 6245 Central Avenue N.E. 1216 Banfill Circle Fridley, P'A: 55432 Brooklyn Park, NG� 55444 Richard Mo::hinski Wayne Larson 7256 E Ca�anerce Circle N.E.6325 Pierce Street n.E. Fridley, D'G� 55432 Fridley, AII� 55432 Rice Creek Prol�erties Resident 1315 Rice Creek Road N.E. 6327 Pierce Street I:.E. Fridley, NLT� 55432 Fridley, D�: 55932 Fortune Investirents 4611 E 36th 5treet Minneapolis, bLN 55406 Ziebart of Plinnesota 6300 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, NL�: 55432 Resident 6315 Pierce Street t:.E. Fridley, I�.ti 55432 rlitchell C�aaiazdon 6350 Pierce Street `�.E. Fridley, P'L� 55432 . snv �s�-os sP �e�-i3 P.S. #87-06 St. Anthony Village PAGE 2 Beatrice Laubach 6336 Pierce Stseet N.E. Fridley, DIId 55432 Henry Peterson 6312 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, NIN 55432 M,arvel McDlaughton 6300 Pierce Stz�et N.E. Fridley, t�LN 55432 william Hauan 6301 Dellwood Drive N.E. Fridley, fIl�7 55932 John Keller 6315 Dellwood Drive N.E. Fzidley, MN 55432 Richard Ficocello 6329 Dellwood Drive N.E. Fridley, MD1 55932 EUgene Ouellette 6343 Dellwood Drive N.E. Fridley, I'II1 55432 Terry Dalzen 6308 Dellwood Drive N.E. Fridley, f'L'� 55432 Plartin Burditt 1065 - 63rd Avenue N.E. Fridley, D�v 55932 Daniel Nelson 6080 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Daniel Nelson 6070 Central Avenue N.E Fridley, MN 55432 Thcaias Gray 6062 Central Avenue N.E. Fridle}', MN 55432 Carl �4ieniann 6044 Central Avenue N.E Fridley, NCv 55432 James Reiland 6068 woody Lane N.E. FYidley, �' S5932 Mark Wilke 6063 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Leslie SQilke 6061 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Harold SWanson 6064 Woody Lane N.E. Fridley, hII�7 55432 Kazimierz Tomczyk 6060 h'oody Lane N.E. Fridley, P1N 55432 Tlargaret Nelson 6090 ��y �� N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 E�erett Utter 6064 U7oodY Iane N.E. Fridlep, NII� 55432 Harold Lind 6076 l+JOOdy Iane r.E. Fridley, rSI4 55432 Kenneth Taylor 6065 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Shore�aood Inn 6161 Highway 65 N.E. Fridley, Mh 55432 Resident 6280 Highway 65 N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Skyline Vet 6220 Higl7way 65 N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 A1ore Lake Funeral Chapel 6210 Highway 65 N.E. Fridley, Mt: 55432 Sv'allace Miller 831 - 40th Avenue r.E. riinneapolis, ti.ti 55421 Sears Store 6199 Highwap 65 N.E. Fridley, DID' S5932 3C St. Phillips Church 6180 Highway 65 N.E. Fridley, rSN 55432 Resident 6289 ��ighway 65 N.E. Fridley, DII�7 55432 Richan'3 Mcen ll28 - 63rd Avenue h.I:. Fridley, DII�7 55432 Edward Ko.aal 1114 - 63zd Avenue K.E. Fridley, D'L*1 55432 Fridley Church of Christ 1100 - 63rd Avenue N.�. Fridley, I�7 55432 John Bergstrom 1086 - 63rd Avenue N.�. Fridley, P1N 55432 Ma�y Tin¢n 1072 - 63rd Avenue N.E. Fridley, NII� 55432 Gary Pierce Star Route 9, Bor, 152 Bismark, DID 58501 Scott Kohanke 6116 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, Mt3 55432 Shorewood Plaza Shoppin, 6225 Highway 65 K.E. Fridley, Nuti 55432 �~ ' VJ I � N , . .. �. 7S 71 73 0 `�� ' � )+I Y� _' 1 O h I e`'19 e B lj�l ��i .� . ..:. l� O. I -MI :♦(•r /+✓'Y r" T�i --�--- --�'F—:��Q.------ I .;'s r ��_ .so� � ' C'> � ` 8 r� � 6 i � �` lY) r. ,.., Q � v 1- y•�- �o�..z •-� _.. �� I�� iV � I �/f 00J AUDITORS C�� 5� � �N� AD '�s � -- fitCE -- --e-R l ( � r,��o� i c,r � � f.,�kj _ . _—e�-- lBaol Ce�`�s/�9✓en✓s , �'/e✓/a J /dC ,� y '• i SUBD. � ; � :' . ; r" `: — -.. _�e .,.<.:is..e �yy, £ ,� (�) i ,e .3 �� (f) � Z �5 IO ' ` \. ��u) E�� . ` {s �3-: "_'.. """"_"" x. zeo.��. � � � I � 1 ' �� 5�, �.1 . , {u3D ��,, ; . �1� • � ' s p ;,1��/� �i�l w: N� nr. �y� e1• o� • �y � ° � �� I <111� �� 3i�� y� � �' .iN��Y�' V �r NF �+ i w' . ,qCF. [. �E � �� , 3- `f r, ,.<w •,. •,M � i ..�r v N .. _ " /' i :- `. .. - / _ � �_ � j � I I l 3� (' (ZOOj i� • . 4 , � ,.� � �zoo> � ' I\Q�� A�So_P� _Y�►T�4 . �,1�,.�,� . �:::1:�:: ti�:�:4:::•:= '••::•r::t.;•. - io.srf�s ;C. /?, �., �5 C�� T) . W V t,l r? 1 5 �� " " ; A _ , �. r �° i�: ' �I ) � �� _ -7 � , S /f'4 L�D � S£/C. / 34 � OCATION MAP �� f 4 � a .- --------� I I . ,. �: _..— : � '.., . ' . .� . . :—..��. _._�-----.�-._--�_�__-.i. ;,fr=�=-�_ � :; � �? ,�-� : - , . ��.�__--%`_�=,i "�- i �_� r----� �� MM� � �! / � ; �,2;C��i�`^ /, i �). /��/_�� ^�_ � . � \ \ � � J , � •�1 - ,' � �" -/' ''� �..r � , . . e,1� 'Y'�.�� /'/ � . � ; y i -�� " , /" / ' /nj. �fR / ..: .-� .. . �.-�. .V�. `a` . / � ' � �{{"'i'I ��, � . E86 � �\ � . I .. .._.... -. ..��i , ��j� �� .:f�- \\ ; I � I ..... _...... �.', . % ' vll • !�.' 9 rrt � +• ( - � _ ,�� 8!�;' �,� � S � .. ►, .� � eea.i �.1 _... ....� l � � ,%•.. � Y' � �:i�� Q g� � i � ,� I.-' � c�_ � � � - , � . � . :v... _ � �q' �i%� �," f i� I . - ��i i � •�� / �,,''„- � '� � 'I � � J /. U i '. .. ... ' 'r . � -. -..:.:.�., r �` i ��.� f I.�� .'- J I � - I� • . I . `� � ". U�• � . "f.� ` " - \� �_ . � ,, ;� ,t,: � � �.r,c.. �..o .w�t �x rv. jl� �� Q �,�, � � � . I� I-� / / •� 11 �.'i \ . � ��1 { fI[ Ir 1 ( � � i 1 � - �90.3 � - � ' � i � � / � � i i i)�/J� �di�. rrt �.'rr '; ��" � I i I /% '`l �: �/ �K.O,' '_ � ��i�� • • , �••t.- � � � I � ��_ y • ��C� w' ♦. T • • • • Y• • � � �.. /��jf �`��'- ,r ; . ••�� • 11 � �(i �.-'� ♦�� I / % l i-a_i_�� ••��, • ►_ t ,.� s '� v .�_�� ' / :� . • . . . .�.� , . /� .t,� �``�` U-.-' ' r• • • • ��`��f �:�� I 1 C.< _ _ e,. 3 / / �. � �o � e � • � i _ . � /.. � � i� . . . • .�a • • � • • • • �i . ��1 =_�i ��I`I i �_.rs'� • • • • • .Tli �J �'. � �• ' � � • • • • • • • • • r � - "--� i � �" ' -'� � ` �!'ift��f��i�i��• i��1� e - � _ _ _ I � A'�ye Lo1. A ca`1�� , � , � �___�--�-----�-�� .�' ,j� • • • �.�• ••�• i� 1 � � � . i i V-� .y • • � r `� •r� ° i r / � • . � e / � - -►. • • •. •nf •t • �Ir� � � �t�. 1 i ..♦ • • • CYD t• 5�1� �� , i'� '� �'�/ 1 / / • �. • • ��y��;, _ - ' i 1 � � �` •' \ � 1 yf / i ; .).. • • • _ ♦ ' � -.i . 1 i / � . . _ �..i"• •i�• • • • •.• V ` ' % � - ._ y II t . ia' , �/ � Y� �� .ta�! b�,►9Dt��•• •.�`II, I ( � � - ♦ • ♦ a^�• • • � � � . � / � -• a i ��• • �.��• • a�� I �' � C �.; , � •' � r � 1 , . . . . . . . . . . � .� i i i� �: V--1 JI,,. -1 _ .�•�.�.�•�.�•��• •�,�•�. I a•� � - 1' �� -'iI ♦ • •.'• • • • y' � � I I •� � � 1 � •� r �.�• • • • • :��,�.�I •�' ~ � a � , � � ... "}. •� 0 • v • • f � • • � � � � � � ' �� , - -,� � ; - . . . . . . . �., 4�r �\.. } � � . 1 ' .� � 1` y /� �' ��.��• A - ; .,l f , , ; , . f�, � ., . , . . . . . . , J'-•i L , , � , �'�. �•' • r )s .' _ 1 , � 7) ` • . ..' •• • • 61''! f ,,,((( I I J � � U�i � t . 1 �� \� . I� _ ' - .'C�� `� � t�✓�' yr` { � i (� �� 1 �� f t �} � f�3-�.i�..� i �f • � ,t . . -.ri=+_ty�f f��,�� ) � � 4 : �\ ! \' r"J// - t s �, � "� -� 1r � r1`� . ... 1, J� I ) `� ` � ��\ �.S � /� '�. � _' _� rl ! ��- 1� j� �s �.` • � i " {I��I � . � I �:'��il �-.�\� ��= :�, � . . . i�l1ir� . } . I '� I, ' i � � �� I i:�_ �- __ 'rt 1 No Tsv�.�i CouY� - � �li�:'i � � �i��. ��_•;N�O;�� -F----�-••--- �� _l.�' �/� ,I��;�n �� R_ , :�: ,s •; -..N �_ ,;�, �„ : i n,�� / • `� -� i`i/��r � i . l�.� � �... , , ' 1;�4�;` / '_- � � � ' .,'"�/,.jl ' _ �.' I _ Jllll� � -- ww��DZ� . . , �7� �' . `�^� �. ��, j�1�Ir � 1 � ==�i _ ,'�'�•. .'1 �ii� ��: �_ �!-. 1 .•'' r�lhi . 4 rw � i .•" ll ��r � �� . �� -��1�! � �,4 '�=_= =5—•== '—_�--^-- ��',�— 7 ��, .—_"� ri1. � '=- -_- �"y_]� r_�c=°' �� 'r .f�•.I • �'�� ' ` � � --. - r++ �__ V - ` _ _ � " . . � � � �'" Mmn l�b �� _�j � ��wd Mle�'_� • " �� I.: � . o.. w. �n e — T ' q^. tc. n�: �� r� .� � � V"'t �I �n� ��c�l� IMuM,f 4 MN I ._ _ . _ .. �� "'= MOORE LAKE COMMON.S-,,.'. � ,s� — PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN ' .I - .f 1- 7 _ � Cc . -r ��at . .�, : .'�C '' � _ I OI. ' �" �J.7f. _ • !o.11 �10� . ir,,�� ? YrTl�.i �W ..�� ' ;• 8 � :c. �L— ;�; { %L�?i� c� :: ^l z� ° i/�i � �'�`� ,: � � � � (,�_1,.u_ .t' _eroii. _ ` `�1 ,.vra c�r ;',_: _ ; I _. . : �: ; f ` ' ' . . ^N _ � � �2 ; 5 :< ;ezo. �� o . a„.,_ � �} : �n . ,,_� . „�_ � �, � V� _-/ft/r.�; _N,ii[.? _,�.�J. ' �w .. • `� / J� � O - � � � z � - . ' �-� /�r/L��fdG R�`j 9 ' - �' :. .; � �. • o � - : ; : ,.,-.� , � � (\� ,, � , , � - /-JS_. ��_/1�i�___ (��J�/d e �C��t ��. _j� � ` � C" ��'� V � i (/� , PYTtOi/ V� y -f . % � n \ ` � ��J� s� � . It � :t �, >s /� Y /B � � - � i ') ,.-�._ I;� .i.�».,!--i.ez;.; �� /3�?r a ��.0 �� , , ` ; ` ;/ I ,;". i �' � i ;:� d ._:�° %. /l ;� �,r, o ;. 4 O- _q ; , ' �;... <�'-•� .�, -:�. ) /6 \ . <..Q5 + �, �' r' � , ,. . .. . �.. , � ; o � • : � .,,a:, . i �` � ; i �___.�..........� -�63 R0 - �......� , , .. _ �. �.. ..._ t.. .......... �„r ... .e .. ,y ' — ,':'x: � �: ,q�f . :� , . �� ., �, �y /%� /„ � ••/ )e � y ,,� � y6.i .� 6 :^ , ; . .yY, `c � . �_ �.•"'� . ' .r �'. .:.. ' „�,� 5 \ A se . . �. �. `'.. �-, ..., Ia-L''.. ,, _ . �� 4i' S. a �,, .... r�~ ' i .> ' ;.. - - ��; _' '• ;'A / •3 C,, ,: , � �. .4' I "� 2�ti ` y, !� a. .,� v�� / .� ; �',,. I� . r— _ l. . - ��' � � , '' I . ; • , h ' ,%•: , , `, . �y'� �' � t ;, �, ,. , ..- � �,Ufl� I �i1S � r , �: .,,s 'I ` �` i i I , '� . j`_"'`_. oP � _� 2 . . , ., , , ; , . ,. , . 4 �. . , � , . ., . LLt • , � /� : / / ' , �w _— Q. ;. . i -� :... � • - — ---------"_� �t'lSDIViS 0 `� ,�'� �.�oo�, � ,, - � .� ; i --- -- ,s o ' I.�l •- � �,-. � � � Ctn�i✓/F��r✓e � ;� �• �t� D z � /n�:ri:i/,irt' . i � . W �e , � � i ; V , . . ; '�I � -�vQ.88 � �' _�V " . � ` :',, �7 �: � I , ,• .;�,:' ; J , 50� I :`: '�.; � � _..._iF;/".., �. j� ; � �' 1 `� � �; . `.. �t . i il/t}1 �., - S � i ^i�v � �� . ... � !� fOJ . ;'r:.� • ; r � - .• ., ,l ti `5 ,o � \V c ,� .i: d. ,_ �.. _ 1-•e Oe�W'; i �"..J � �M1 r •. _,.'/r , , . ...f�'_, ,�E ' !./,,<tfi.I.>rl ti R� �'�- hu �ry '`y :��:�=r '° :� � ' � . � ,� , �.� - , � i .' S:� : i.:/3. , '.t b ff c.r . � � ..�'.•y ' ••. y� /tISli4. (�L�J% "' � - :- -nrt - - C �? - S//4� ORNER ' ' , S C. /3 � �_ �` J / ORDI!�A1�CE N0. 354 A\ OFDISA.\CE TO A?fEKD Tk� CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDI,EY, NTS`:CSOTA BY DIAKIFG A CfIMGE IN ZOilIKC DISTRICTS 'Ihe Council of the Ci[y of Fridley do ordain as follovs; SECTIO\ 1. SECTSO?7 2 Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended as hereinafcer indicated. She tract or area vithin [he County of Anoka aad the Cify of Fridley and described as; All that part of Lots 4 and 17, puditor's Subdivison �o. 88 [hat lies �ithin [he follo�ing described ]ines: Cortmencing at [he Forthcast (A'E) corner of Lo[ 5 of said Auditor's Sub- division, thence Kes[ along [he Torth line of said Lot 5[o the West right of vay line of Central qvenue, [he actual point of be�inning, [hence con[inuing i:es[ along the �ozth line of said Lo[ 5 to a point loca[ed 40.5 fee[ fiom the !�erth�:est (S17) corner of said Lo[ 5, thence tiorth paralle 1 [o and 350.4 feet iJest of [he Eas[ line of said Auditor's Subdivision a distance of 570 fee[, Uicnce East parallel [o che t:orth line of said Lot S a distance of 290.4 feet to tbe Mest right of way line of Central Avenue, thente South along the i;est right of way line of Central Avenue to the point of beginning, [hence terminating � . _— � --- --... _ . _ Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District known as "� PD (planned developmen[ distric[s) All tha[ part of Lo[s 4 and 17, Auditor's Subdivision 60. 88 that is not nou zoned C-2-5 and excep[ tha[ par[ of Lot 17 o�:ned by che Citq of Fridley, and excepc [hat par[ described , above Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned Districc knoun as � C-2-S (general shopping areas) SLCTIOt< 3, That the 2oning Adminis[rator is directed to change the official zoning map [o shov said [ratt or atea from Zoned District R-1 (single family dvellings) and G 2-S (general shopping areas) to PD (planned development discricts) and froo R-1 (single family dwellings) to C-2-S (General shopping areas) A11 1}•ing in [he sou[heasc Quarter (SEi) of the Sou[h�est Quarter {Sl:�) of Section 13, T-30, R-24, Ciiy of Frfdley Coun[y of Anoka, 5[ate of Minneso[a. P;,SSED 8� iHE CITY-CO'.'SCIL OF T}fE CITY OF FRIDLY THIS STH DAY OF DECEMGER, 1966. V ' ' �_ `''`�� Jack 0, Kirkham .-:ES: .^� � 1 � � ��i��l.ti "" �L-�� —?latvin C. � unsell �==1ic Heazing; �:rsc Feading : �•�^�d Feading: •_::ish. . . .. rovember 14, 1966 Kovember 21, 1966 December S, 1966 December 14, 1966 : E;;;: f � �%(� �'v� OFDI\A'�CE K0. 349 (CO�TIKUED) and if he finds ihem to be in conformity wi[h the � provisions of this ordinance and the Final Develop- ment plan, he shall sign and issue a Certificate of Occu ancy. - . 5. Peziodic Reviev. ' If cons[ruction vithin [he Planned Developmen[ Districc or any staging thereof is not begun vithi❑ one year from the enac[ment of the Ordinance escablishing ic, the Building Inspector shall report such fact co the Planning Coc.nission together 4ith such other information as is availablc to him concerning any actual or planned changes in the surrounding area ui[h respet[ to construc[ion of buildings, roads, highvays, oz o[her public inrrovenen[s. I'he report of the planning Commission shall be censidcred by the Council ac ihe nex[ regular meeting or at such o[her meeting as [he Council ma}• direc[, in order Co deCermine whether [he contiwed zoning of such area as a Planned Development Dis[ric[ is consis[en[ vith public health, safety, or general velfare. If the property is not rezoned as a result of such report and Council consideration, the Planned Development District zoning shall be revieved and reconsidered at one year intervals until such conscruc[ion is subscantially comple[ed in accordance vich the approved development plan. P.4SSF.D EY T1� CITY COI,:SCIL OF TI� CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 3RD DAY OF OCTOi�ER, 1966. licotion ' ATTEST: '4 innesoto , .+ ri- Jack 0. Kir ham . -' ��,,.�,.._ � ,i A�r �li CIT] CI: Sn - Ptarvin C. 6runsell First Reading; Septe�abez 19, 1966. Second Reading; October 3, 1966. Publish: October 12, 1966. i � 4C i� � rq��a►�l • pra�isions of thie Dist�ict and the adopted General Plan of D�cti•elo�ent. Hoaevec, nothing herein shall be construed to create norronforning lots, building sites, building or uses by virtue of arry such corneyance of lot, bui2ding sites, building or part of ihe development created in confotmance with said Plan. Subsequent structural additions ot alterations may be made provided the provisions of this District and othec ordinances are adneced to, to the extent that said ocdinances may apply. E. ROCLfdL�Od1 116f i1LEd5 A(7d BU.l.l�flg6• In the event certain land aceas nnd buildings are provided witl:in the planned unit development foz private zecreational use, the a.�nec of such land and buildings shall enter into an ' a9reanent with the City to assure the continued operation and r�intesance to a p:edetem.�ined starxiard. � F. Uses Perm.itted. Unless otherwise prohibited b� Iau within tTe City, any use of , land or buildings vhich is clearly desi9nated by type or ' cate9ocy on the approved and adopted Genera2 Plan of Development ' and su:sequently apprwed site plans, shall be pecmitted Y�y this � Distrid. I G. Intecpretation Of District Provisions. (1) Whenever a question arises concerning the interpretation of any Section of this district, it shall be [he duty of the Planning Crnvsission to ascertain all facts concecning said questions and forward all data and a re.;cr:rsrcation to the City Co�uicil for a dete�mination. (2) If withifi thrQQ (3) veazs from the time of district a;n:a�al b� the City, there is no development or action of de.�elo�r,cnt, the property will revert to the zoning distcict in effect prior to this actionr �less an extension is gra:ted by the City Co�cil. _...._._ .. � 205.19,3. PUD Distcict 205.PUD-5 , . = ,.:r.: ... - - - � e.+e�. I � I � � :�� t i � � .� / � C�7Y GF FRIDLEY 5 6431 UNiVERSITY AVE. N.E. —7 FRIDLEY, MN ssaa2 LOT SPLIT FORM L.S. �` 8 T— O� (612)571-3450 . L(7P SPLIT FEE , I A_ PARR FEE RECEIPT # S�]ET.[)LID PLADR�ING OJ�4•ffSSI0�7 MEETING A4TE: - — E% SQiE�ULID CITY dOUNCII, MEETING LY1TE: PROPERTY INFORMATION nDr�FSS: �dT y�.LYds . L� % LE�AL DESQ2IF�`IbI�I: � �l� y ! �H�KVi¢W �2IAdJo�? Z'�=_-�o.�.':in� �07� BIACR ! 'IIiACP/ADDITIDN •, �• �• •, 3� 3 � ,. ,, ., „ �xESFrrr zor»c TZ— 1 REASON EOR LOT SA,IT: A sketch � the property and the proposed Iot spiit with ary existing structuzes shoan should acam�ny this apgtication. * * * s * * * * * * * * ie * * * * � * * * * * * * * * � • * * * * * * « * * * ,r r * FEE OWNER IN�ORMATlON r� �� Ii 1Z l� �,�%,v�.' ��/-,�A�.,S��OoA•,Et��iortE # S7/- 3 YS G r�mFSs sicru�xE � Note to�Con rac .-*** *:* Cz 7t�t �- �ET ION R ,i�t� 5�.�� DIRFSS �� Purchasers; Fee e s m s 1 n fo rior to proce s **f * ***,�"'*�*�'��* ,�*�:k**,��"$'**•* _.L.��.��.'. � �� 3> �'ua�e � �0� •y� �.�� . ;7C;N7�7STRE DATE . i * t 7t • * * ft 1 t !� * sr t * * • * t t � • x * * t * t * * • * * * "� * * * • tt t * � . . . . . . _ . . . � rt.��uc ourQ�sswN : arxzwm nIN� nA� c�Tr aootxu, : SPIAJI.ATIANS: ... �. .� �� • QTY OF ERIIi,EY Jtme 11, 1987 'IO WF3'JM IT I+YiY �NCERN: 5A The City of Fridle3 Planning Commission will be holding an informal hearing on a request for a Lot Split, L.S. #87-05, b� the Fridley HRA to split off part of Lot 4, Block 1. Parkview Manor Second Addition, and part of Lot 6, Block 1. parkview Manor Second Addition, gec�rally located south of Central Avenue and north of Hackmann Avenue. The legal descriFtions are as follaas: A. �at �rt of Lot 1, Block 1, Parkview Manor Sewnd P,ddition, according to the nlat thereof on file and of rewrd in the office of the oo�mty reoorder in and for Anoka Cr��mty, Minnesota, lying easterly and northeasterly of and adjoining the following described line: Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot 4; thence southwesterly along the northwesterly line of said Lot 4 a distance of 5.34 feet to the point of beginning of said line; thence southeasterly, deflecting to the left 9n deqrees 17 minutes 18 seoonds a distance of 1.69 feet; thence southeasterly and southerly a distance of 100.90 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 132.26 feet and a central angle of 43 degrees 42 minutes 44 seooncis; thence southerly, tangent to said curve, a distance of 10.13 feet, more or less, to the south line of said Lot 4 and there terminating. S1�bject to easement of reoora. B�at �rt of Lot 4, Block 1, Parkview I�nor Seoond Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of remrd in the office of the oolmty recx�rc3er in and for Anoka 6�imty, I+linnesota, lying westerly and southwesterly of and adjoiaing the following described line: Commencing at the most northerly corner of said r.ot 4; thence southwesterly along the northwesterly line of said Lot 4 a distance of 5.34 feet to the point of beginning of �id line; thence southeasterly, deflecting to the left 90 deqrees 17 minutes 18 seoonds a distance of 1.69 feet; thence southeasterly and southerly a distance of 100.90 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 132.26 feet and a central anale of 43 degrees 42 minutes 44 sewnds; thence southerly, tangent to said curve, a distance of 10.13 ieet, more or less, to the �uth line of said Lot 4 and there terminating. S1�bject to easement of rewrd. C. 1`t�at pact of Lot 6, Block 1, Parkview Manor Second P,ddition, acoording to the plat thereof on fiie and of remrd in the office of the oo�ty recorder in and for Anoka Co�mty, Minnesota, lying westerly of and adjoining the followinq described line: Commencing at the southwest oorner of said Lot 6; thence easterly along the south line of said T•ot 6 a distance of 18.00 feet to the noint of beginning of said li.ne; chence northecly, deflectinq to the left 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds a aistance of 17.13 feet, more or less, to the rocthwesterly line �f Gaid T•ot 6 and there tecminating. SUbject to easement of reQOrd. D. Rhat �rt of Lot 6, Block 1, Parkviea Manor Seoond Addition, according to the olat thereof on file and of reoord in the office of the wi,mty rewrder in and for Anoka County, Nunnesota, except that p3rt lying westerly of and adjoininq the followinca ciescribed line: Commencinq at the southwest oorner of said Lot 6;. thence easterly along the south line of said Lot 6 a distance of 18.00 feet to the point of beqinninq of said line; thence northerly, deflecting to the left 90 degrees 00 runutes 00 seoonds a distance of 17.13 feet, more or less- to the northwestecly line of said Lot 6 and there terminatinq- �ubject to easeme�t of reoord- Anyone who wishes to be heard shall be given the opportunity at the Planning Comnission meeting on �°e�esday Jlme 24, 1987 in the Cotmcil Ch�r of City Hall at 6431 ihliversitv Avenue N.E. at 7:30 p.m. SYE,�IE BII,LINGS QiAlftlglN PLANNING ODNAffSSION L.S. #87-OS Fridley HRA Donald Kerner 5794 Haclvnann Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 William Eckland 5786 HacJcnti'uui Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Carl Brudwick 5778 Hackmann Avenue N.E. Fridley, D�7 55432 Paula Reed 5779 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, D7N 55432 George McKitterick 5787 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, PiN 55432 ' Jerxy Seeman 5795 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Richard Kealy 5771 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Delbert Yaeger 5763 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, P7N 55432 Duane Flaten 5755 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Virginia Ostlund 5770 Hackmann Avenue N.E. Fridley, NIN 55432 Ann Williams 5760 H3alu[rarv� Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Rudolph Stohl 960 Hacknann Circle N.E. Fridley, D1N 55432 MRII.ING LIST Planning 6/17/87 Coimcil Union Oil Co. 5695 Hac]anann Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Union Oil Co. 1650 E Golf Road Schaumburg, IL 60196 Rd�rt Gilstad 930 Haclanarui Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Glen Davis 940 Hathaway Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Robert Wayne 5741 Fblk Street N.E. Fridley, P'IN 55432 RoUert Lehner 5725 Polk Street N.E. Fridley, P'IIV 55432 Louis Ada� 5740 Po1k Street N.E. Fridley, D'A] 55432 James Jorgenson 5730 Polk Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Joseph Bran� 5720 Po1k Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Richard Brandt 950 Hathaway Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 : l ^, �, 22 � �I i I , �I E 0� 0 � , 9 • � � i/ � -�.:�... .�. // .ry • .y I I -.. - , , �`. � � , , , � ,, . L�' � MEL��pNO r \ Gp�pENS �� G� � Y:.' % � iG.l � ,. . :. . � .. � F � ^ HAG : ; r :� ' - . s,_ � � � �.M1' �_ ' H �/ I � LOCATION MAP 3'� � � � , ��: � � '> �° ` w es� .f'j , ,f� � , � + _' E�"� � � `� i ,`',� `.'• C' _' LAKE � � . - F,� � � .. � � � �`� /,% . � t�' �..,, f,, � ` � ` � � °� I E � �� ° -�� R � ��'� �f � p, 0 � �'scrro��_ F f � � � ,�;�, f ��K� � , �. ► � (� • �o�. ..1 i ,,L�j i s. i w�•'� I �I , , �o-,. n o ', � ( • � y .�. 3 z, `'� � � �` �\ � / i---�a T; � � �,�, _, � � ' i ♦ % \ ( • � M�R�,GOLD TEFRAGE 6 � d !� �� i I I � W � i_ ' '�� f � , i •' e� , =1--~- � - �,.• . � . ' I !��7e z- A,P3� �� i 1 � ' � �D� � .; � f �. t� N av r,�',z "' � o� . � r / ,f �1 2 . i '�j' U /. i. • _ � � N, .c �}v��R:.H �;,� z, - w ,r ;, -�:_' ��a�e w z, �,�.. 1 � I II--<.-, `,I�N tiW`• ��yJ�, 3 '' � � £M�S RE ti� � •. VAKE ; �• �Eac ,�,� • . P . � � e/ . , ,� `�„� �,o � t . � '� Q��b, i / ��;�- � . oa� �P . a' , % , �" . v � � .t, �, � E / J � /4; �� '� � /� � , u �' �; �r n .: �� ., .r,s. �� . T �:'7 �(�3 �� ,�,� � A(�0, > ' �� Nf � �� 3f �9 1 -.� . _ � �, �t' �jr.,t � , . �' Y = 3 �' .� R ' . "- K t � ,� ��; .��z - 1 /y \'/'�" l y �- UJ ��\ ��,, s\p , � rX � _ , � � n �� I j a , _ � � ., a�J�� z _ � z , zr ,a p �/� �r ` :. y��,{q� � -'r-'�xs -r-r�T �+1�.;•�'3, I,i�ln��. »>s;r��,�:'u..l i z, s s', . ir - ' - t - 1 : /k , 1ATH Y A ��E == _ � ,,, �;��9iR 3� , .��r - ��r �,z,: , , . .� � . . .. . . . „L�'N'BA „�! 9,a �&JItUL�'RS� 4 ,��;� k:.... � . . . . .. • . DkivE � " � ! F !,• , �� 8 � ,'Fi z i 8 ��jl !V� ` l ib�_ra� � • • • ; • • • , . . . . 2 • �:_!.lt�].V.r � i{ :i � • • • • • • • —c�b .-:':�f. :'. �� • ? � :�`r� �QQRT N _. ; , ` � ��i �_ • • • 5 .�j�y � �n 69: I��1T. !. s•— Pa+rt(}��_ '�'L''g j � / V, 05 �� p- � • 4 �-� - , , - �_L. . �r.�YQ�^'%�C.''- . Qc [� �r1��.��,�y.,r 6 4 �::^ =HlL_W/N 67 '-'-' ' ��Q�1�J J ��v7�,",-".'S�'� � r� ,` ADOI?/Oh' • • • • • ',�.`��-t"'.:��_,��- �. • �+� � • � ?--.•.<<: Lv,� n a�� _. ': . 8 N a -� � �`��: ��;- V�:... �, , � • � .t_ _ _ _ __ _ �r 9 1?r,✓ i ,, i ''`�tE��:•:' S�E� aE� LAKE�9 �` uoue� +.•.•. ,�p .4 HEIGHTS , Cn.. � - s - c G, ` !_ H ` �-rR�LNt� ` '�= I -- �b!�w,,,, � V`°� - �o ,.,.. Y Z � � 1-- 32s � � - '�N + � `� r�.� 3. �\ 'a" . ! '� �y1-� �•�'f / 4. +Cy�� \� � '+ � `� � •a � � i•"�.� � \ �\ ��" � •�\ �, r • �\ \� : � yv ., ♦• / ' � r�� `'if cD Q � � � \ \ �` \ �`, ♦ \ (�,, ! /\ �\ '3 \/ `� •f/' f%• �y, � ; �� , N C. � � °P � � 'o \ \ �( � M \ � .•,ti �' �9. � ,`� �rI \� '9's ,. , �''l,� �. �,i sb �� \ y0 � � � m o. � . f�� +,� •� +, r ��. � O \ /�__ 5E �, � . � � '+.' -:, �� .. t,r� `, . 4_ i� V 52 , S: ! ` �� '� I �r o ni 'i _� �� .. � ; r N I C �- � � . U �� N I •//' ' t�' I � � Y ♦ � �r ^ r 0 ^ I • I : � W N �n e` J �� _ � ; <� I `� � I L2 SZ I � i I i I 9�. 9f . I L 1 d � � C L 9f I � a vr . �f ` � I, ` �. o � �r r. �d �� •+ LEGEND • ar�o�s Rorr � Fouw 0 o�ohs vr r�ori � sEr CERTi�-"1CATE OF SURVEY FOR crnr oF �m�r i � � P� /6� 'm .� - � A . ,,\ m �� /y �; � jc�'� 0 `i`��p, \ �� O� \ p� � � 1' ` r�_ ._- , . � � \ � SOVTM LINE OF LOT \�'15.-- — — LEGAL DESCRIPTIOH MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 4, BLOCK 1 < � :� , � �, BLOCK I ! 1_ — __ . HAqCMANN * .� ' � SCALE IN FEET p 30 60 / / DRAINAGE 7�NC1 _J 49.31 AVEMJE ,: Tnat part of Lot 4, Block 1, PARKVIEii MrNOR SECAND ADDITION, eccording to the plat thereoP on file and of racord in the office of the county recorder in end for Anoka County, Minneaota, lyinq eaeterly end northeasterly of and adjoining the followinq deacribed line: Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot 6; thence southwesterly along the northwesterly llne of sald Lot 4 a dietance of 5.36 feet 'to the point of beginning of said line; thence southeasterly, deflectinq to the left 90 dagrees 17 minutes 18 seconds a distance of 1.69 feet; thence southeasterly and southerly a distance of 100.90 feet alonq a tanqential curve conceve to the southvest having a radius of 132.26 feet and a central anqle of 63 degrees 62 minutea 4d aeconde; thence southerly, tangent to eaid curve, a diatance of 10.13 feet, more or less, to the eouth line of said Lot 4 and there terminating. Subject to eaeement of record. I hereby certify prepared by me or a d�ly Reqistered of Minneeots. � that thia auzvey, plan or report was under my direct aupexvlslon end that I am Land Surveyor under the lnxa of the State Dat� 4- 20-87 xegistration No. 18165 i� .. � �_'J � C: FIIE H0. .�� e�i�4z DRAWING MQ tM+N!l�e5 � wKMTK'75 � ►IAMMtRS __ LEGEND • DElJOTE$ iOPi PPE FOIR'� 0 oEraores „r �orr � st� CERTIF-ICATE OF SUFiVEY FOR crnr OF �m�r r P�" /, MOST NORTNERIY CORNER OF LOT 4, BLOCK I t � �� . �'�� = a � � ` �.� �r t /��P oGb � _- h 0 __..,-_. '-�� O ,[ /�a3,� A• .... ., - . ... � /1�roP O �� I� _ pF � i�.--"f�� .. __ __ac'? � i 33 _ - � — A w � _._._ . _.� q _-- r __ . _ 1 � 4 ,,.� _ ,� C _. \ ._.____ _�-_.�.�`�-_ - ��SOU7H LINE OF lOT 4', BLOCK� HACKMANN LEGAL DESCRIPT26N �, * � ' � SCALE IN FEET p 30 60 c* _� AREA= \ 2936 SF ♦ � 6� ORAINAGE AND UTILI7Y EASEMENT� / J 49.31 AVF1Vl1E P�? �y�r��, � F�' /. That part of Lot 4, Block 1, PARKVIEiI Ml�tiOR SECAND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record ln the office of the county zecorder in end for Anoka County, Minneaota, lying eaaL9rZ�_ and -, � f�or#qaastbt.Ly_ of and adjoininq the folloainq described line: "`'' "`Y �a:��Sn��r3i c-icy . Commencing at the moet northerly corner of said Lot d; thence southwesterly along the northaester2y line of said Lot 4 a diatance of 5.34 feet 'to the point of beqinning of said line; thence southeasterly, deflecting to tAe left 90 degreea 17 minutes 18 seconds a diatance of 1.69 ieet; thence southeasterly and southerly a distance of 100.96 feet along a tangentinl curve concave to the southvest having e radius of 132.2fi feet end s central angle of d3 deqrees 42 minutes 44 aeconds; thence southerly, tangent to said curve, a dislance of 10.13 feet, more or less, to the eouth line of said Lot 4 and there terminatinq. Subject to sasement of record. I heraby certify that thia aurvey, plen or report was prepared by me or unGer my direct auperviaion and that I am a duly Registered Land SurvAyor under the lawa of the State of Minneaota. , Dat� 4-20-87 OVE D � �� [MGwtfRf �wa[latf[TS � euW/1lRs Regietretion No. �8165 %� r. � �_'J � f: Bb 142 DR AW ING CERTIFICATE OF Sl1RVEY FoR CITY OF FRIDLEY , � ,-, Y / �-'-'% LEGEND ,�, � • bENOTES IRON PIPE FOUND yo�1-� �:'; � o DENOTES 1/2' IRON PIPE SET 0� • � r \+ � .. II �_t� � s� I � ` �6' \ C` � j � � F �; �o � �? �. ��'.�'�� / .. .. r �,;i�, t. � ,}' �°�` `r ,�V ` t�� , (��f/�4� p, V / c J y`a,E. P�? . _.P�� / 6i�� SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 6, BLOCK 1 = 154 SF � _ . — i�� — � � �SOUTH LINE OF. LOT "6, BLOCK I LEGAL DESCRIPTION HACKMANN 5N `_ SCALE IN FEET • � .� \ � �J _ \ -" \ . .. _. ---; .-_ .. _... ... �_-�' ' \ " '~ `�' ' � � �� / /� Y� / � J�.// AVENUE -That part of Lot 6, Block 1, PARKVIEW MANOR SECOND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the county recorder in and £or Moka County, Minnesota,� lyinq weaterly of and adjoining the followinq describeC 2ine: �_ =_rPT 7h,y � 1'� ,_- Commencing at the aouthwest corner of eaid Lot 6; thence easterly along the aouth line of said Lot 6 a dietance of 18.00 feet to the point of beginninq of taid line; thence northerly, deflecting to the left 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds a distance of 17.13 feet, �aore or lese, to the northweateriy line of eaid Wt 6 and thera terminating. Subject to eaeement of rocord. I Aereby certify that thls �urvey, plan or report was prepared by me or undar cy dir�ct supervieion and that I am e duly Registered Land Suzvsyor undsr the lawe of the State of Minneaota. v Dat� 4-20-87 Regiatr�tion No. 18165 APPROVED �� ..__ __. 84142 OATE DRAWING wcx+[�ws �w�oxtrrn �r�wwtns - CERTIFiCATE OF Sl1FiVEY FOR CITY OF FRIDLEY � : �Y I' �-`'% LEOEND ,�� DENOTES IRON PIPE FOUNO �o��<:�'�, DENOTES 1/2' IRON PIPE SET � SCALE IN FEET 0 � � \ \+\ r� \ �_l I � `, � t � �� /. pI r 5� 6'�/ \ �� , � j \ o ao so ,_, ° / .� �� . \ � �y �'� / 1 \ /� � S :: `_ �,i `� a y'� �pz/ � .. \•�� oe.� �'�� ? J,��/ \ O 'r r. �GF'�/ pi i_ v T h SOUTMWEST CORNER OF LOT 6, BLOCK 1 A= 154 SF �SOUTH LINE OF LOT 6, BLOCK I ._� _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION HACKMANN \ / 1 / __J�— I AVENUE -ThBt part of Lot b, Block 1, PARKVIEW MANOR SECOND 11DDITION, accordinq to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the county recorder ln and for Moka County, Minnesota, lying westerly of and adjoining the following described line: Commencing at the eouthweat corner of said Lot 6; thence easterly along the eouth llne of said Lot 6 a dietance of 18.00 feet to the point of beqinning of said line; thence northerly, deflecting to the left 90 degreas 00 ninutea 00 seconda e diatance of 17.13 feet, more or leas, to the northwesterly llne of said Lot 6 and thera termineting. Subject to easement of record. I hereby certify that thia aurvey, plan or report was prepar�d by ne or undsr ay direct �upervieion and that i am a duly Regiatered Land Surveyor under the lawa of the State of Minnesota. Det� 4-20-87 Reqiatration No APPROYED �� OATE wcw+a�s �.�rrrcrs �rcwwv�Rs 16165 84142 ort �w iNC No. .'i,.� � dF::�, t' {"+CCt a„ 1:Y. •. '7� }! hai �w}� �S � i s�xi,.'yAt- �� g �, �� 9 �"��'�t* � . ( �, h '..�t� ?i r � �.l� •.I �� Y> 1B � f t:. � .. g " t ,� F � �' jr �. t .�fp, s ;� ��. y ata ..�,a� ,e.7va,� u 'b rs ,..3 �.. � � � r� �J �:; a. P ' :.fJ N -�'.� � F � "� S 4 � .,� €'-- �. "['+ > x .k�.�� s� . � ' s � < � a r C i� ' �. '� °,�`' : c 3, L- e� h / r5': � �" q .� ,4 �z'�ai 3y r � w y iy,r��y��r�, T� $�4�, y `Yf i �.{ ... .. � tl t t 1�i 1 ',y �' 4 1 a - 4 V 'i } , e��'"' � �" �.. t {@^ Lri "J'y: . 3 � � ~ � i YL wt . '1 � � M YL r= t n i 1: k: 2� y� ' nj h � �� , � • �'4� i �'�, � a �� ) � s } �n �'�`�: �t�.. F;i�� . �:'' i �r•J.�f.-r:.�l-f r Y�i r�• :' �i�-2,�.`s r r l l`�x-. P �%' �,ii r • L! A�� x ` 4i,�.€t{ � ��Z�s ' �� Yl�)';_ <� .11 L E } .. c � ,� 1 � 4�: r 3<.i k ; .� cl � � �jF•. 1f 9. . _5 1 ' � ? a •�:�Ti4 {�i:' 4 i; � > 4 „e i � i>�: �a�i, ijy �3 , tti, �. �. t� f, ` SX {.. T' . t; � � ,^j �1`. r� � . r �.. � �,' ~;� �� CITYOF f itt DLEY r�rfl zo: PLANNING D1V15[ON MEMORANDUM Planning Comnission l�ti� PxOM: 3im Robinson, Planning Coordirr�tor ,¢. PEFD IK,TE: Jime 19, 1987 F.�ZRi:DIt�: Co;,cnercial EstablishTent in N.ixed Use Industrial Develogrents Several recenC applications for special use permits for offices not essociated with a principal use in industrial zones is evibence of the raFicily ch�ging market place. �hese multi-use buildings are generally high quality developments which are desira6le to small to reedium size office/kar�ouse u:,ers, sen•ice prwiders and wa�ehouse sharroa;. facilities. Frcrauently, ra3uests for occupancy bf semi-commercial to strictly cor,unercial busiresses are rracie to the City. Marr� of these requests which are in a"gr�� rcti" between ouncoercial and industrial create difficulties in processing. Ir. orcier to facilitate some oormiercial/retail type establishments in r�ixed use industri�lly zoned developments, it ma� be advisable to expand the c�:istir.g special use permit categoty, for offices, to allow for sor.e uo:::�rcial o�erations. Strict criteria for such use oould be defined in the cia. Pcic�u3te �rking for all uses would be tranCatoiy for any a;cu,.-�ncy. T.0 sFecial use perr.:it process would provide for findings of fact and an c•�•i��tacy record as to �mpstibility a•ith surroimd.ing land uses, traffic and �Lrt:inc su�ply. Attaciied please find a Larkin Hoffman study of other municipalities �r:a.rtaken on t,�half of the Fast River Road Business Center. Ji.h ¢:. I'� E :' -142 � eo.ca . ��•• . .orrw.. ...<+ r o��r o �� woa�i• ..oniw w. o.��aeo. cMOO.�. �woanaa« acw.io. nimui no�vn+��w +wcK ��in�n wo�cwr�� «c.w�a�• .. riomw[� •�[S [. [O�CI�fON COW�110 l OMIfCOLI ..cs � n��n OLM[ M Ll[11 O�"�O C.�[tl[POP[N q��wnl�O J. w[LM.�M JOwN O LtM[R !OlCn�CU�O�I[ IIVLY wic..wo ��o�acwun I�IGw�RD �. MOPO��[ CM�NI[! 6.M00[ll c�wu.o�.�s �. mv:�• �o•• w. �uim +iwo.. na�iw .ow..s n s+o�•.�+ a+avc. o.�c.�• w�noca� o. w c..ei c �.c...w .co .,ior�i +. a z�w i i..„..a ori„M� ax �• ca • .000 . r e��r.�r. 'rso.c� .aoioro« •s w. � �cao.�w. .w.• T0: FROM: LAAIiIN, HOFFMAIv, DALY Bc I.INDGAEN, LTD ATTORN6Y5 AT LAW ISOO MOHTHWESTERN GINANCIA� CEHtER Y000 P�PEA J�FiFAY TOWEfi �900 %ERxES AVENUE SOl1TN 222 50UTM NINTH $TREET BLOOMINGTON,MIHNESOTw 55�31 MINHEAPOl15,M�NNESOIA 55�02 TELEVHONE(8121636-]BOO TEIEPMOHE16121338-6610 TELECOPIER �g121 B]3-5102 TEIECOPIER 16121 �38-1002 REP�YTO Bloomington M E M 0 R A N D U M Jock Robertson, Director of Community Development Jim Robinson, Fridley City Planner Linda H. Fisher ��, �i�y�,� •i a�ownn�o.,.. ,nron ou.�o �. �ac. TwOMAi �. MV��NR[V. J11. ac•. .oau��. onc.. �.. cr�iiu co�+ce . �cn��c�� u n.as- .w�cc i. �aor.wmu •�VMR[TT 3ViAN R.OURryIOXT il 6R�D� i1.00W uMLifX M ��CORt M�W��N 4RV� /� wOCX �fTCM J-<O�l[ C�TXCI��XL • N[Tf WiIfON• •OMMRNOS�I�M wY C. wMD[R�ON o.w�c � �. sow�ca �o..•»o. o. v,�o� �O'DC M. v ��I.'o;RM O�MYnJ. a M11i �i��.r imcne cn.w . .�r�wao« •u�• a.w.. �nuc r.o.,.� .�� w��vu ��co�.ec� oav; Minu �.�..�i� aw � s n. u�oo. RE: Research Concerning Use Status of Restaurants and Other Similar Retail/Service Facilities in Office and Industrial Zoning Districts in Various Metropolitan Area Municipalities DATE: Our File: 12,591-01 May 5, 1987 At Ken Belgarde's request, we have compiled information relating to whether various metropolitan area municipalities allow restaurants or other service/retail facilities in their office and industrial zoning districts, and, if they do, what controls they apply to such uses. This material is offered to assist the City of Fridley in evaluating an amendment to the text of its zoning ordinance Chat would allow a proposed catering/delicatessen use to locate in River Road Business Center, which is currently zoned M-2 Industrial. It is possible that such a text amendment would also make provision for other support service and retail uses to locate in other business and industrial districts in the City as either principal permitted, accessory, or special uses. The following summarizes the results of our research (citations are to the zoning ordinances of the cities under discussion at a given point in this Memorandum). Edina In its Planned Office District (POD), Edina allows as accessory uses many kinds of retail uses, including restaurants. in buildings which have a gross floor area of 40,000 square feet or more; provided that these accessory retail uses must be accessible only from the interior of the principal building and have no signs or displays visible from the outside � LAAKI�, HOFF1+ffAN, DALY Sc LINDGHEN, LTD. Mr. Kenneth C. Belgarde May 5, 1987 Paqe 3 IIn all Industrial Districts in Burnsville, retail sales (undefined terml � of products stored or manufactured on a given site are allowed as � accessory uses. A maximum of 208 of the floor area of the space occupied by the particular business up to a maximum of 850 square feet may be used for retail sales purposes. However, single structure leasing to more than five tenants under separate leases may not have more than 108 of the total building area devoted to retail space as an accessory use. Section 10-23-2(A). Additional parking for such accessory retail uses must be provided in addition to that required for the principal use. Section 10-23-2(B). Moreover, no sign or display in excess of four square feet shall be placed on or off the property advertising the existence of the retail sales facility; any wholesale stores or manufacturing principal use may not have a sale more o£ten than once per calendar year and not to exceed three days in length; and, if excessive on-street parking occurs, the sales shall cease or be reduced to the level that the off-street parking can accommodate. Section 10-23-2(C)- (E). Retail sales are also allowed as a conditional use in all Industrial Districts in Burnsville, subject t�the condition that such retail sales area shall be a minimum of QO 000-�quare feet. Section 10-23-3. In both I-1 (Industrial Park Districts) and I-2 (General Industry Districts), ree-standing restaurants are allowed as a conditional use. Eden Prairie A recent amendment to the Eden Prairie Zoning Ordinance, adopted on April 21, 1987, provides that "supporting commercial sales and services to office users within large office structures of 100,000 square feet or more" are permitted uses in the OFC (Office District), provided that the commercial use does not exceed 158 of the gross floor area ratio. Section 11.30, subd. 2(B). The same amendment provides that�"supporting minor commercial uses as contained within office/industrial buildings, ,r,,;„+� providing a supplemental function to the major office and/or industrial use" are permitted uses in the I tIndustrial District), provided that the commercial use does not exceed 158 of the gross floor area ratio of the building it occupies. Section 11.30, subd. 2(D). Bloomington In B-1 (Limited Business Districts), "retail sales and personal services customarily utilized by or essential to the accommodation of the traveling public but only when such uses are accessory to a hotel or motel and included within the principal building," together with drugstores and coffee shops and cafeterias (when located within medical or dental buildings), and barber and beauty shops (when located within office buildings), are permitted accessory uses. "Retail stores for the sale of arts and crafts, gifts, flowers, plants, groceries, bakery goods, 6C � LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DaLY 8c LINDGRE�. LTD. Mr. Kenneth C. Belgarde May 5, 1987 Page 4 produce, dairy products, drugs, sundry items, books, newspapers, magazines, and apparel" are also accessory uses in the B-1 District. . Section 19.30(c)(1), (3)� (4), and (5). Restaurants accessory to motels and retail shopping uses (but not personal service uses) when located within a multiple family dwelling building are conditional uses in the B-1 Zone. In I-1 (Industrial) districts, retails sales incidental to the manufacturing of products manufactured on the premises of the principal use are allowed as accessory uses. Section 19.33(c)(4). In addition, various retail sales uses are allowed in buildings primarily occupied by medical and dental services (such as drug stores, coffee shops, and cafeterias). Section 19.33(c)(5). Restaurants are allowed as conditional uses in I-1 districts, as are service stations. Section 19.33(d). In i-3 (General Industry Districts),�"uses not specifically set forth herein (in the conditional uses section for Industrial Districts) which, in the opinion of the City Council would be compatible with the area in which [they are] located and which would not constitute a public nuisance," are also allowed as conditional uses. Section 19.33(d)(9). In addition, in I-2 (Limited Industry Districts) and in I-3 (General Industry Districts), retail sales which are a part of warehousing or wholesale businesses are allowed as conditional uses. Section 19.33(d)ill). Restaurants when not included within a hotel and motel are specifically excluded from Z-1 and I-2 districts located within the stadium area. Section 19.33(h)(3)(D). There are two office zoning districts in the City of Bloomington: the Commercial Office District (CO-1) and the Residential Office District (RO-50). The intent of the CO-1 district is as follows: "The commercial office district is intended to provide areas where offices, compatible office-like businesses, and high-density residential uses may be developed with the assurance that commercial uses with incompatible characteristics will not impede or disrupt the establishment of an attractive and cohesive grouping of mixed yet interrelated uses. This district is to be applied only in areas adjacent to arterial or collector streets. The residential uses within this district are appropriate provided they are subsidiary to office uses on the site." Section 19.40.08(a). The intent of the RO-50 district is as follows: "It is the purpose of this district [RO-50] to provide for a mix of uses appropriate to a high-density residential environment. It is intended that this district provide an arrangement of land uses which 6D IMr. May Paae LARKIN, HOFFMA:C, DALY E� LINDGI�E\, LTD. Kenneth C. Belgarde 5, 1987 incorporates office and commercial activities which are interrelated to the principal residential use. ..." . Section 19.40.09(a). In CO-1 districts, retail stores for the sale of arts and crafts, gifts, flowers, plants, groceries, bakery goods, etc., and personal service establishments such as barber shops and dry cleaning stores, and restaurants are provisional uses. This means that they are allowed provided they are located within a building primarily devoted to a permitted principal use. Section 19.40.08(c). In the RO-50 district, retail stores of the sort allowed as provisional uses in the CO-1 district are allowed as conditional uses, as are restaurants (provided their access for customers and service is separate from the access for residential uses) and personal service establishments of the sort allowed as provisional uses in the CO-1 district. Section 19.40.09(d). St. Louis Park Zn the B-1 iBusiness District), which appears to be the closest thing that St. Louis Park has to an office zoning district, 65 different kinds of retail/service businesses are allowed as permitted uses. Section 14-150(2). In addition, Class II and Class III restaurants are allowed as special uses. Section 14-150(3)ib). (See definitions of various classes of restaurants, below). In the Z-1, I-2, and I-3 Industrial Districts, various retail sales and service b�sinesses are allowed as permitted uses, including auto sales within a structure, commercial greenhouses, garden supply stores, off- sale liquor stores, sporting goods stores, and many others. Section 14- 170(1). Open sale or rental lots for motor vehicles (used and new), furniture, trailers, airplanes, boats, and other items from an open lot are permitted by special permit subject to numerous conditions, as are drive-ins (again, subject to numerous conditions), and restaurants (Class I, Iw, II, III, and IV), except that Class IV Restaurants are not permitted on premises abutting Minnetonka Boulevard, Louisiana Avenue, Cedar Lake Road, and Lake Street within 500 feet of the City of Minnetonka and shall not be permitted on all property in Shelard Park or other planned development units unless such use is planned as an integral part of a total plan development and designed for walking patrons rather than auto-oriented patrons. Sections 14-170 and 171. In Z-2 and I-3 Districts, Class I, Iw, II, and III Restaurants are special uses. The following will clarify what is meant by the various classes of restaurants referred to above: 6E LAAKZ�, HOFF�iA\, �DALY Sc LII�DGAEN, LTD. Mr. Kenneth C. Belgarde May 5, 1987 Page 6 1. Class I Restaurant: a sit down restaurant with on-sale liquor. 2. Class II Restaurant: a sit down restaurant without on-sale liquor. 3. Class III Restaurant: a cafeteria which is a sit down restaurant. 4. Class Iw Restaurant: a sit down restaurant with on-sale wine but which does not serve any other form of intoxicating liquor and which serves food to its customers while they are seated at tables. Section 14.123.101(1). Eagan In both of Eagan's Industrial Districts, Class I restaurants are permitted uses. Section 11.20, Subd. 16(A)(9) and Section 11.20, Subd. 17(A)(1). A Class I restaurant is defined as, "an eating facility where food is served to a customer and conswned by him while seated at a counter or table." A Class I restaurant also includes, "an eating establishment where food is selected by a customer while going through a serving line and taken to a table for consumption." Section 11.03(62). Plymouth The Office Zoning District in Plymouth is the B-1 (Office-Limited Business District). In the B-1 District, Class I restaurants are conditional uses, as are personal service and repair establishments and repair and service uses when secondary to the allowable use. Section 8, Subd. B. In Plymouth's I-1 (Planned Industrial District), retail and service establishments essential to the operation of that zoning district and providing goods and services which are primarily for the use of persons employed in that district are conditional uses. Section 8, Subd. B(2)(b). Brooklyn Park In Brooklyn Park, the office zoning district is the B-1 (Limited Business District). In the B-1 District, Class I restaurants which are located within and mainly serving an office building are permitted uses (provided there is no outside display or advertising of the restaurant use). Class I restaurants are defined as restaurants where food is served to a customer and consumed by him while seated at a counter or table and where no intoxicating liquor is served and no live entertainment is provided. Class I restaurants also include restaurants where food is selected by a 6F LAAKII, HOFFMAN, DALY Sc LINDGAEN, LTD. Mr. Kenneth C. Belgarde May 5, 1987 Page 7 Icustomer while going through a serving line and is then taken to a table for consumption. In addition to Class I restaurants, barber or beauty. shops, tanning salons, convenience grocery stores, and retail sales and �vending services (when such retail areas are within a building so constructed and maintained that public access is from a lobby, hall, or court and not directly from the out-of-doors and no free-standing sign is ,allowed for each individual retail use) are also permitted uses in the '�B-1 zone. Zn the I-1 (Limited Industrial District} and the I-2 (General Industrial, District), Class I restaurants are also allowed as permitted uses. Sections 366.12(a)(34) and 366.13(1). It also appears that certain other retail uses are permitted in the I-1 District as well, although the text is somewhat unclear on this point. Section 366.12(a). Class II restaurants are allowed as conditional uses, subject to a lengthy list of conditions in both the I-1 and I-2 Districts. Sections 366.12(b)(6) and 366.13(b)(56). Class II restaurants include fast food, convenience, drive-in, and liquor service restaurants. Section 363.02(zzz). Golden Valley In Golden Valley's Light Industrial 2oning District, "wholesale-retail distribution centers" are permitted uses. Section 6.03. Retail sales of greenhouse products (where located inside and incidental to wholesale businessl are listed as conditional uses. "Retail commercial uses, such as shopping centers," are expressly prohibited in the Light Industrial District. Sections 6.04 and 6.05. In Golden Valley's Industrial District, "wholesale-retail distribution centers" and Class I restaurants are permitted. Sections 7.02(1) and (9). Class I restaurants are defined as, "any traditional type restaurant where food is served to a customer and consumed by him while seated at a co�nter or table, including cafeterias where food is selected by the customer while going through a service line and taken to a table for consumption." Section 12.02. Conditional uses in the Industrial District include "drive-in retail establishments, such as banks, cleaners, photo shops, restaurants (Class II), and similar uses." Section 7.03(9). Class II restaurants include drive-in restaurants and fast food restaurants. Section 5.03(12). In the Business and Professional Offices Zoning District, limited retail services within a professional office building are allowed as conditional uses. Section 10.091(E). Minnetonka The office district in the City of Minnetonka is the B-1 (Office Business District). The purpose of the B-1 district, 6G L2�RKI:v*, HOFFMAN, DALY 8c LINDGAEI.i, LTD. Mr. Kenneth C. Belgarde May 5, 1987 Paae 8 "is to provide a district for office and accessory service uses but which excludes general retail and service uses. Retail sales shall be prohibited except for uses established primarily in support of the principal office use. Exterior display of inerchandise shall be prohibited." Section 300.17, Subd. 1. "Business service uses normally associated with office developments and containing limited retail activity" are conditional uses in the B-1 zoning districts, as are, "restaurants and cafeterias incorporated within a principal structure and oriented predominantly towards serving the needs of employees of the surrounding area but excluding drive-up and exterior walk-up facilities." Section 30Q.17, Subd. 4(a) and (c). "Other uses customarily associated with but subordinate to a permitted use, as determined by the city," are allowed as accessory uses in Minnetonka's B-1 zoning districts. In B-1 districts, none of the uses permitted by conditional use permit may occupy more than 25 percent of the gross floor area of the building or of several buildings developed under a unified site plan. In the I-1 (Industrial District), "service" uses are among the permitted uses. Section 300.20, Subd. 2. "Retail or service uses not exceeding 25 percent of the gross floor area of the principal structure are allowed as accessory uses." Section 300.20, Subd. 3(e). Retail, or service uses occupying between 25 and SO percent of the gross area of the principal structure are allowed as conditional uses in the I-1 Zndustrial District. Section 300.20, Subd. 4(b). Elsewhere in the Minnetonka 2oning Ordinance, some specific additional standards are set forth regarding uses permitted by conditional use permit. In B-1 Zoning Districts, business and service uses normally associated with office developments and containing limited retail activity, (1) shall not result in any exterior building modifications, including truck docks, separate entrances, free standing signs, or overnight truck parking; and (2) shall not exceed more than 25 percent of the gross floor area. In addition, in B-1 Districts, restaurants and cafeterias incorporated within a principal structure and oriented predominantly towards serving the needs of employees of the surrounding area but excluding drive-up and exterior walk-up facilities are subject to the following: 1. Only wall mounted signs, subject to the limitations of Section 300.30, et seq, of the code of city ordinances shall be permitted; L�RKI:v', HOFFbSAI�, DALY � LI'_\'DGAE_\', LTD• Mr. Kenneth C. Belgarde May 5, 1987 Page 9 2. They may not exceed 15 percent of the gross floor area or 3,000 square feet, whichever is less; 3. Parking vehicular circulation shall be in compliance with the requirements of Section 300.28 of the 2oning Ordinance and shall be adequate to accommodate the restaurant; 4. They shall only be permitted when it can be demonstrated that their operation will not significantly lower the existing level of service as defined by the Institute of Traffic Engineers on streets at intersections; and S. Their hours of operation shall be limited to 5:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Section 300.21, Subd. 3(a) and (c). In the case of I-1 Districts, retail or service uses occupying between 25 and 50 percent of the gross area of the principal structure, (i) must result in no exterior modifications being made to the principal structure; (ii) must result in no outside storage or display and no accessory structures to the principal building; and (iii) must have sufficient parking, consistent with the standards specified in Section 300.28 of the Minnetonka 2oning Ordinance to accommodate that use. Section 300.21, Subd. 6. Finally, in Section 300.28 of the Zoning Ordinance, it is provided that: "For mixed-use buildings, parking requirements shall be determined by the city based on the existing and potential uses of the building. Proof of future parking to be installed when necessary may be used." LHF:AP7 6H a CYTY OF FRIDLEY HUMAN RESOURCES COt�t1ISSI0N MEETING HAY 7, 1987 CALL TO ORUER: Chairperson Sherek called the May 7, 1987, Human Resources Cor�mission meeting to order at 7:40 p.r��. ROLL CALL: Menbers Present Menbers Absent: Otiiers Present: Sue Sherek, Dick Storla, Paul Westby, Francis van Dan Claudia Dodge Bill 11unt, Assistant to the City Ftanager �obert E3rick, ARC - Anoka County, 4024 Central Ave. N.E. nPPROVAL OF APRIL 2 1987 HUtMW RESOURCES C0�it1ISSI0°J t1IPJl1TES: MOTIOtJ by t1r. 5torla, seconded by Itr. Westby, to approve the April 2, 19A7, Hunan Resources Commission minutes as written. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Sherek declared the motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: MOTIOI� by t4r. lJestby, seconded by 11r. Storla, to approve the agenda as written. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Sherek declared the motion carrie� unanimously. 1. OL� BUSIi�ESS: a. Report on April 11, 1987, No-Fault Grievance Training Ms. Sherek stated �1r. Hunt, Mr. van Dan, and she attended this training. She stated about 17-20 from several cities attendeA the training. She thought the training went rather well. She stated there we1`e now 6-7 trained No-Fault Grievance Committee members. 2. NEW BUSINESS: a. Consideration of Applications from Human Service Organizations for 1987 CDBG Funds �4s. Sherek stated that at this meeting the Canmissioners would review each application they had received for funding. What they would he doing at this meeting �•�as developing the questinns to be asked of the human service organizations at a special public hearing meeting on May 28. Each organization that has subnitted a request for CD6G HUttAN RESOURCES COh1�9ISSI0N_14EETING, �1AY 7, 1987 PAGE Z funding wi1T have_the opportunity at that meeting to be heard. Each organization wi11`be given a 15 minute tir�e slot for its presentatio�-- the first 10 minutes for answering the questions posed 6y the Commission and then 5 minutes for telling about the program and how that program will impact the people of Fridley. The Conmissioners reviewed the applications and put together the following questions: North Suburban Consumer Advocates for the Handicapped, Inc 1. What are the boundaries of your service area? 2. How do you define "information and referral?" 3. Har does this differ fron First Call for Help? 4. How many Fridley residents did you serve in your last reporting year? In what ways were they served? 5. How did you arrive at $2,500 as Fridley's share of a 54,638 program? Alexandra House, Inc. 1. Please supply copies of 1986 financial report, 1986 balance sheet and 1987 budget in advance of the May 28, 1987, meeting. 2. How many Fridley residents were se�ed in your �st recent completed reporting year both in your residence prograr� and in y�ur other programs? How many in each category were AFDC recipients? 3. What services or referrals are provided for the battering spouse? Association for Retarded Citizens of Anoka Count 1. How many retarded people are there in Fridley who could use your services? 2. How did you arrive at the amount of Lhe request from Fridley? 3. How do you intend to relate to developmental achievement centers and other agencies in the area in order to avoid duplication of services? HUNAN RESOURLES COt44ISSI0IJ tdEETIflG MAY 7 1987 PAGE 3 4. Hov+ will you publicize/promote the availability of this service? 4Ji11 this involve extra funding? 5. Is there any correlation between the developmental achievement center promoted by County Commissioner t9ichael 0'Bannon and the Anoka County Association for Retarded Citizens? Anoka County Coranunity Action Program, Inc. 1, lJhat do you see as the long-term relationship between the Senior Outreach Worker and the Fridley Senior Citizens Center, the designated focal point for senior services in Fridley? 2, What constitutes a "contact"? Hot Pleals for Shut-Ins, Inc. 1. Ilave you requested Title 3 funds for this program? If not, why not? 2. Do you need to replace insulated carriers? If so, how many? 3. Ha-r many Fridley residents are subsidized, and what is the average subsidy per meal? Fridley Senior Center, Inc. 1. Is a"ride" one v+ay or round trip? 2. Why are the shopping trips free? 3. Why don't the fares projected for 1987 and received in 1986 tie in with the respective number of rides? 4. How many lower income residents of Fridley will be served by the addition of this service? North Suburban Center for the Arts 1. Did you hand out an income questionnaire to all participants? What questionnaire did you use? What procedure was used to assure anonymity and encourage a voluntary response? HUHAN RESOURCES COMMISSION t4EETII�G, MAY 7, 1987 PAGE 4 5outhern Anoka Comnunity Assistance 1. Please provide in advance of the �4ay 28, 1987, meeting copies af your financial report for 1985-86 and proposed budget for 1986-87. 2. What are the scheduled times that SACA is open durinq the week? 3. How many hours a week has SACA actually been open during the past six months? 4. How many unduplicated Fridley families does SACA serve in a six-month period? 5. If we are unable to fund your salary request, do you have another need for funding which you would like to propose? 6. lJhat is your policy on referrals to other sources of assistance for your clients? How many referrals did you make in the last 12 months? Church of St. lJilliam 1. How often do you buy meat and what kind of ineat do you buy? 2. What is your policy on referrals to other sources of assistance for your clients? How many referrals did you make in the last 12 months? North Suburban Counseling Center 1. Please clarify your intake policy regarding individuals with limited ability ta pay. 2. How much did you reduce services to fridley residents at the end of 1986? ' 3. How many Fridley residents were served in 1986? Now many sessions were held? 4. Now many of your clients in 1986 met the HUD lower income require- ments? NMat percentage of your total clients is this? ADJOURNMENT: MOTIOW by Mr. Storla, sewnded by Mr. Westby, to adjourn the meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voti�g aye, Ghairperson Sherek declared the May 7, 1987, Human Resources Commission meeting adjourned at 10:15 p.m. Respectfull�ubmitted, R�U-a-� yne aa Recording Secretary e CITY OF FRIDLEY �10USI�lG & REDEVELOPMEtJT AUTHORITY MEETING, t1AY 14, 1987 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Commers called the May 14, 1987, Housing & Redevelopment Authority meeting to order at 7:10 p.M. ROLL CALL: Mer�bers Present lienbers Absent Larry Cormers, Duane Prairie, John �1eyer Virginia Schnabel, klalter Rasriussen Otiiers Present: Jock Robertson, HRA Director Nasim Qureshi, City ttanager Dave ttewman, HRA Attorney Rick Fribyl, Finance Director June " Louis Lundgren, 1140 tlinnesota Bldg., St. Paul APPROVAL OF APRIL 9 1937, HOUSII�G E� REDEVELOP�1EWT AUTHORITY �1IIJUTES: MOTION by 11r. �1eyer, seconded by Mr. Prairie, to approve the April 9, 1987, Housing & Redevelopr,ient Authority minutes as written. Upon a voice vote,all voting aye, Chairperson Comners declared the r�otion carried unaninously. CO(lSIDERATIO�J OF LOU LUNDGREN'S LETTER OF CREDIT: �1r. Lundgren said tiiat approximately 60 days ago, he had presented the HRA with a market feashility study for the project done by tlaxfield Research group. Mr. Lee Maxfield had attended the IiRA meeting to make the presentation, At that time, �1r. Lundgren stated he had also told the fiRA that they �iere having P1r.P1axfield do the study on the senior building at the sane tine. He stated that as the IIRA members migfit know, the market for senior buildincls in the metropolitan area in general was felt to be overbuilt. There was no question of the need, but there a�as a question of the tining and the exact quantity. He stated he now had a rough draft of the senior buildinq study and he a�ould give some highlights of that report. He stated he hoped this information would 9ive the HRA, as it did fiim, a feeling of sor�e assurance for tliat phase of the project. Mr. Lundgren stated ttie report gave the numbers of seniors that need housing in tion of the units that are ready to be sor�ewhat of a hold situation, demographic data and indicated the this study area and gave some indica- started and the units that are on Mr. Lundgren stated the study indicated that their market interviews of demograpfiic research indicated that the younger seniors wouid be the prir�ary HOUSIfJG & REDEUELOPt1EfJT AUTHORITY MEETING, MAY 14 1987 PAGE 2 market for this development, especially in tlie absence of a health care sponsor for the developer of the project. They reconmend that the building be positioned for a"young" senior project �iith no services intially planned for persons age 55-75 years old. The building should have less common space than is typical in a building marketed for older seniors, but yet allow for the space to provide those services in the future as the residents aqe. Unit rents should be similer to the general market rents with slightly smaller unit size compensating for the extra cor�unon areas not found in the genearl market building. f4r. Lundgren stated he had met with Mr. 17axfield on Tuesday to go over the final points of the draft. He stated they were proposing to leave in nost of the large common areas, but in the economic income study they would not count on tfie extra services that would be there. The possi6le future resi- dent in touring the building would see all the facilities shown in the sketch plan. According to �1r. 1laxfield, it would make quite a marketing difference. �4r. Lundgren said tfie study stated that rents r9nging from 75¢ per sq. ft. were recommended in 1987 for units of 650-750 sq. ft. for one bedroom units, and 825-1,000 sq. ft. for one bedroor�/den and two bedroom units. fie stated they have always been at the two bedroom and one bedroom/den size. �4r. Maxfield's recor�mendation was for about l0a larger and tliey intend to modify their plans according to those recommendations. Mr. Lundgren stated ttie study stated that based on the market denand, location, demograpfiic trends, and the recommended developraent concept, they estimate an absorption time of approxinately 15-18 montlis once the building was availa- ble for occupancy. This assumed a strong narketing effort beginnin9 at the ticie of the ground breaking and an aggressive leasing a9ent to meet this market. Pir. Lundgren stated �1r. P4axfield had also suggested that, based on his experience, this building should be about 25-33°r� leased at the tim� the construction was completed. P4r. Lundgren stated this report should be available within a week, and he would get that to Staff. I�Ir. Lundgren stated Mr. Maxfield had recor�r�ended that betoreen 100-120 units be built. That was a little less tlian he had talked about, but he 4ras pleased about that range in terms of financing. 4�hen �rojects are below 100 units, then tiiey have to go with a different kind of lender. So, he thought this would be compatible, and in dollars and cents, it would be about the same dollars as the other building �lhich, including all the soft costs, would be about $10 million. �1r. Lundgren stated it might be desirable to pursue the senior building very rapidly after the first building. They are looking hopefully at starting the second phase yet in 1987. They would be pursuing the third phase as soon as all conditions have been met. HOUSIPJG & REDEVELOPI1ENT AUTNORITY I�tEETI�JG, ItAY 14 1987 PAGE 3 P1r. Gomners asked Mr..Lundgren how he vias progressing with the funding for Phase I. Mr. lundgren stated he had had two meetings with 4Jinfield Developr�ent Co. Winfield was quite interested in the coromercial aspects of the total project, but was not too interested in the residential portion. As a result of these meetings with ldinfield, he has written them tfiat he a�ould be willing to enter into a joint venture, and he had laid out some broad terms. Generally speaking Winfield was still pursuing this joint venture. He should know within a week if there was going to be any kind of joint venture. i•ir. Lundgren stated they are still pursuing the possibility of using tax exer�pt bonds for both phases which would mean the pricing of the units have to be different. Mr. Conmers asked about tlie other lending groups tfiat had expressed an interest in the developrnent. 14r. Lundyren stated he was still working �rith Steinberg Financial Co. and Rothscfiild Financial Corp. He stated Murray Savings � Loan in Dallas, Texas, was going ahead with a project in Bloomington and was not going to make any More investment in the metropolitan area, so that was a"no" from �1urray Savin9s & Loan. Mr. Lund9ren stated they still have three alternative financing plans. They are pursuing lJinfield, not exc�usively, but concurrently with the other two. He stated he was not coning to the HRA with a story of success or a story of failure 6ut was giving a report of �ahat was happening and what they think is going to happen. Mr. Comners stated that at the last meeting, Ms. Cherry Lundgren had said that within two weeks, tfiey hoped to be back with an actual development agreement with a lender and a financing package already in place. She had also talked about a construction date of July 1, 1987. Mr. Lundgren stated that was an accurate statement and reflected their particular feelings at that time, lie stated he was still talking about a July 1 construction date. Mr. Cormers stated that at the last meeting, Mr. Qureshi had said the project looked better than it had for the last couple of months, and had thought there was no harm in delaying the drawing of the letter of credit for another month or two. Mr. Qureshi stated that for a number of months, 11r. Lundgren had basically made no progress. Then, last month, at least, he came with a different set of options tliat he was pursuing. There was a general feeling at that time by the HRA that i� was the most optir�istic report they had received, lie stated he was kind of disappointed aboutLundgren not fulfilling the state- ment made last month that they would HOUSIIJG & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 11EETItdG tiAY 14 1987 PAGE 4 2 actually have a development agreement and would be submitting that to the NRA for approvai at this meeting. It looked like none of the 5-6 options had panned out at this time. He stated his level of optimism was much lower no�a than it was one month ago. Mr. Cornmers stated the HRA had three alternatives at this meeting: (1) call the letter of credit; (2) leave the item on the table and do nothinn; and (3) set a deadline for calling the letter of credit which was suggested at the last meeting. Mr. Fieyer stated he felt that t4r. Lundgren was working hard to put the project together. He was actually working for the tiRA because he was the only developer at this time. If they draw on the letter of credit, from a practical standpoint, then it was the end of the project. fie thought the HRA should continue to encourage Mr. Lundgren in his efforts. Mr. Cor�mers stated there have been a lot of inquiries but not a lot of other interest as far as another developer for this area. Mr. Correners stated that since there was no action taken by the HRA, this item would remain on the table for another month. P1r. Commers cautioned Mr. Lundgren that Ptr. Lundgren should not continue to rely upon the fact that the HRA has not taken any action on the letter of credit. He explained to I�Ir. Lundgren that the HRA might at any time call the letter of credit. �•1r. Lundgren stated he fully understood that. CONSIDERATIOW OF BARTON-ASCH6IAN AGREEMENT FOR UNIVERSITY AUENUE PLAM: Mr. Robertson stated that at the last meeting, the HRA had approved a budget with Barton-Aschman for an amount not to exceed 323,300 to cover the University Avenue Corridor detail design. Mr. Meyer had brought up the concern that Barton-Aschman had no provisions for field observation for the work done by them. Mr. Robertson stated that in his memo dated P1ay 8, he had concluded that Hr. Meyer had correctly identified the problems inherent in "design by committee" and had diagnosed a need for one prime consultant to be directed by one accountable staff project engineer. After thinking about that, he thought there might be some problems, so he went back to Barton-Aschman to tell them the City needed one new set of wor4:ing drawings. In the HRA's packet was a revision of that and the basic budget o-�ent from $23,300 to $28,800. He also asked Barton-Aschman to add some options, and these options totalled $15,800. The breakdown of those options are as follows: �3,600 - proposed intersection improvements 4,200 - different treatments of the median 8,000 - field observation HOUSI?�G & REDEVELOPNEN7 AU7NORITY MEETING FiAY 14 1987 PAGE 5 Mr. Robertson stated that if they added the $15,800 to the $28,800, it gave them a total potential budget of $44,600. Mr. Robertson stated Barton-Aschman was recor�mending supplemental field observation by city staff under their supervision. This would increase actual field supervision effectiveness and would reduce the City's cost by an estimated 52-3,000. 6arton-Aschman estimates that if they do the field observation alone, it o�ouid cost $7-8,000. He stated he would recommend that the HRA go along r+ith Barton-Aschman's recor�mendation for supplemental field observation by city staff. If the HRA was in agreeraent with that, a supple- mental agreement would be drawn up. I1r. tteyer stated tfie principle he saw in this situation was that they want 6arton-Asclinan to be able to tell them under the usual understanding of this type of woirk that the work has been properly done. The HRA does not want �arton-Aschman to say if something happens that it was because the city staff were messing around with Barton-Aschrnan's responsibility and they cannot take tf�e "usual" responsibility entailed in field observation. Ilowever, the City is not demanding a higher standard of field observation than is usual, and that shoul�� 6e nade clear to Barton-Aschman. If Barton-Aschman can guarantee that they �,vill take total responsibility even with city staff under their supervision, then it was o.k. If not, then his vote �rould be to give Qarton- Aschman th�e total contract. t4r. Prairia stated he would not be too concerned either way. Two thousand dollars did not seera to be a very big savings to the city. 11r. Cormiers stated maybe it was be*ter for the city to stay out of it, so Barton-Aschman was accountable. It was tlie concensus of the HRA to let t1r. Rober•tson work out an agreement with Barton-Aschman, keeping in mind that they want to be sure that if city staff is a�orking with 6arton-Aschman that 6arton-Aschman clearly is assuming the supervisory responsibility for the staff person(s}. 3. LAI:E POIIlTE STATUS REPORT: Consideration of Street Easement for Union 76 at TH 65 Mr. Robertson stated f1r. Flora had gotten a preliminary telephone agreement fror� the local representative forISNOCAL that 55,000 for the street easement and relocation of the sign would be acceptable. This now Vias to go on for final approval by UNOCAL personnel. He stated he needed approval from the HRA that if they reach a final agreement 4iith UNOCAL for �5,000 that City Staff can go ahead and complete and expedite this right-of-way agreement. MOTION by Mr. 14eyer, seconded by 11r. Prairie, to authorize Staff to negotiate with UNOCAL Service Stations for the acquiring of 1,253 sq. ft. of easement area for a price not to exceed $5,U00. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Commers declared the motion carried unaninously. HDUSI�JG & REDEVELOPt1ENT AUTHORITY h1EETIflG, MAY 14, 1987 __ PAGE 6 b. Consideration of S.E.H. Amendments Mr. Robertson stated they have asked S.E.H. to give a detailed accounting of r�ork that has actually been done before the HRA authorizes payrient of the contract. S.E.H. has done that and it was in the agenda. Last montfi the HRA approved an additional S8,270 toward the design of Higfiriay 65, and there was another $20,000 previously authorized that the HRA iiad never received an accounting for. Mr. Conmers asked what the total cost of the contract a+as ��ith the ar�endments. !1r. Robertson stated the total contract was �33,822 (including �8,270, 520,052.15, and $5,500). �10TION by h1r. Prairie, seconded by t1r. Robertson, to approve the authori- zation of the increase� expenditures in the S.E.ti. contract including the �8,270, $20,052.15, and $5,500. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Comners declared the motion carried unanir�ously. c. Consideration of Earthwork Change Orders Mr. Wewman stated they do want to make an attempt to settle the clair� made by Enebek. He had huped to have sone numbers for the IiRA at this meeting, but had not yet received them. Once lie had those numbers, he woulJ like to poll the HRA by telephone and get a concensus of what kind of range they should settle vrith Enebek. �4r. Robertson stated that as stated in Mr. Flora's letter of May 7, there might be a need for the City to initiate sone change orders in order to allow the construction to proceed without delay, and P1r. Flora would like the HRA to authorize the City to execute any change orders to tlie contract that are deemed necessary by the City and the City's consulting engineers. Mr. I�ewman stated �vhat t4r. Flora was talking about was all the contractors with the Lake Pointe project. Staff had soMe concern that if the City had to wait a month to get authority fron the HRA for a change order, it could cause some difficult delays. The contracts were actually entered iiito between the City and the contractors and because of Staff's desire for a quicker process to review these change orders, he would recommend that perhaps the best way would be to have the City Council approve the change orders since they meet twice as often as the HRA. 14r. Prairie stated that if Staff brings the change orders to the City Council fully researched and the City Council does meet more often than the HRA, he had no problem a�ith Mr. Neo-rman's suggestion. HOUSIfJG & REDEVELOPt4ENT AUTHORITY ttEETItJG, 19AY 14, 1987 PAGE 7 i"ATIOtJ by t4r. fteyer, seconded by Mr. Prairie, to authorize the City Council to approve any change orders for all four basic contractors for the demolition and site 9rading of the Lake Pointe project as deemed necessary by Staff and the consulting engineers. The aggregate of said change orders shall not exceed $50,000 without further approval by the HRA. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Commers declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. RolSertson stated the procedure for any work concerning Lake Pointe goes to the attorney before it is distributed. After the agenda went out, he liad received a change order fron Sunde Engineering for additional staking and inspection. Staff and the attorney have reviev+ed it. The amount was for 57,500 for additional staking and inspection which repre- sented about a 5% change out of the 5150,000 contract with Sunde En9ineer- ing. It was up to the HRA whetiier they wanted to approv? that chanqe order at this meeting or review and discuss it at the next meeting. t4r. Commers asl:ed Staff to give the HRA a report on why this oias done and who authorized the additional work for their next meeting. 4. CLAI�4S 1595-1604): MOTION by I'tr. Prairie, seconded by Mr. Iteyer, to approve the check register as presented. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Corriers declared the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURIJMENT: MOTIDPI by Ilr. Prairie, seconded by Mr. Meyer, to adjourn the voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Comners declared the Housiny & Redevelopment lluthority meeting adjourned at 8:55 Respectfully submitted, ," �� Lyiin�rSaba Recording 5ecretary meeting. Upon a 11ay 14, 1987, ,m. / G � �/ � �Z �'.��y^ �- ✓��,.t�i ^�-f�-�'>J'rr-�'�' ��'c �-tt;' 0-� � � � , �� 5�, /9�7 �.. //�� '1'�� '1 v�o I�� -`�..' � �e,2 c�� .� , �� 1/ zfD �jz n,,�; �,�`�� S/�J �- ��,t �r� ss � o CITY OF FRIDLEY ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING MAY 26, 1987 . � CALL TO QRDIiR: Chairperson Saba called the May 26, 1987, Energy Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Dean Saba, Bruce Bondow, Bradley Sielaff Members Absent: Glen Douglas, Gerald Welf Others Present: Larry Ehlers Myra Gibson Wicklacz, Planning Assistant APPROVAL OF' APRIL 28, 1987, ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Bondow, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to approve the April 28, 1987, Energy Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SABA DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. I. RADON CONTAMINATION DISCUSSION Mr. Saba mentioned the presentation on KSTP regarding radon contamination and asked if inembers had had a chance to see the program. Members had seen v+�rious portions of the program. MS..Wicklacz noted that the presentation showed the pamphlet which had been distributed to commission meeeoers entitled a Homeowners Guide to Radon. r, Mr. Sielafi also noted that a representative from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) was on the program. Mr. Sa`� stated that a number of radon readings had been taken throughout the stZ`.j;�d in all cases the readings were above the level considered safe. \ - Ms. Wi.cklacz stated that a safe standard is considered 5 and *_t�at betwe . 5 and 9 different cities exceeded these standards. tne progra: ir,<crmed people of what radon contamination is, how it is caused, and how it c�: :,e minimized. Mr. Bondow asked if the program generated interest so that people n:- he interested in a program. Ms. Wicklacz stated that between 200 and 3�0 people had called the station for further information. ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 26, 1987 PAGE 2 Mr. Saba stated he would try to get a tape of the series from KSTP for members to view. Mr. Sielaff asked what KSTP had done in their testing. Mr. Saba indicated that KSTP had reviewed radon detectors, one of which was recommended for putchase which measures the alpha particals. The recommended detector is hung up in the basement for five weeks and then sent in for analysis. Mr. Saba was not sure of the cost, but felt it was something to be investigated. He also suggested asking KSTP to rebroadcast the program on cable. This topic could also be included in the grant discussion. Radon contamination could be a program in Fridley, 6ut there is not enough information at this time. Ms. Wicklacz asked what people would do with the results of the radon teading when they get it. Mr. Saba indicated that a high radon reading would indicate the need for some work such as sealing basement cracks, covering drain openings, adding ventilation, etc. Mr. Sielaff asked if these steps have been proven to reduce radon levels. Mr. Saba indicated that it has been proven. Ms. Wicklacz stated that an article on radon contamination would be included in the fall issue of the city newsletter. Mr. Saba indicated that radon contamination had been discussed at the Planning Commission meeting and there was a great deal of interest. Mr. Siela£f stated he would talk to Mr. Charles Lane, MPCA, to see i£ funds were received for research. Mr. Saba indicated that, although the commission could not do a comprehensive program,. they could publicize, do some testing, and find out what the levels of radon are in homes in the City. 2. COMMUNITY ENERGY COUNCIL GRANT PROPOSAL DISCUSSION Ms. Wicklacz indicated the deadline for grant application was June 17th and asked commission members for suggestions. Mr. Sielaff indicated interest in the small business energy management. Mr. Saba stated that working with small businesses in the past has been a ptoblem in that there was not enough interest in such a program. At the State level, there have been programs for auditing and grants. Little interest was shown in upgrading buildings since many are rented. The Chamber of Commerce also contacted businesses but had little success. Perhaps the commission could work with a developer to incorgorate some energy saving features in properties being renovated. Mr. Sondow asked if there wete grants ot subsidies available. ENERGY COMMI:SSION MEETING, MAY 26, 1987 PAGE 3 Ms. Wicklacz noted that few are available. Zt would be necessary to work with ihe Department of Yublic Service iDPS). There are restrictions on what the money can be used for. For a project such as this, she thought it woulci take longer than the few weeks available to meet the deadline. Mr. Bondow expreSSed interest in the particularly the park and ride lots. � done through signs or cable TV. energy conservation activities, Perhaps further promotion could be - Ms. Wicklacz was not sure if the City should do this or the MTC. MTC has been contacted to see if anyone had shown interest. Holiday Plus was not interested. They do not mind if the parking lot is used unofficially for a park and ride lot, but they did not t.ant a sign. The Holly Center also preferred to be undesignated. People also park at the Georgetown Apartments but they have not been contacted. People travelling from farther north generally park at Northtown. Mr. Saba expressed concern about the bikeway system. The City has bikeways and wa].kuays, but they seem to have gone downhill. Mr. Saba has not seen improvE:ment in terms of publicity or safety in crossing major highways. The City has a nice system along University, but it is not safe. The commun�ty does not make it easy to get around by means other than cars. Ms. Wicklacz added that an additional problem is a lack of bike racks for parking bikes. If the commission would like to pursue this topic, the Engineering Department would need to be contacted. Striping for bikeways is included in the General Fund, but this may have been cut in recent years, Mr. Saba asked if funds for striping the bike paths could be specified in the�grant and send along a map of the City bikeway system. Ms, Wicklacz has access to maps, but would have to check about the use of funds for striping. Mr. Ehlers asked about improvements for sidewalks. Mr. Saba indicated a problem with sidewalks is that they are not plowed in winter. Mr. Si.elaff thought these ideas could be included in Community Energy Ylanning Aciivities. Mr. Bondow asked if the City had been keeping records of energy use and consumption. Ms. Wicklacz indicated that records had been kept and studies done, but no one has used the information. Mr. Sielaff stated that they had talked about getting an idea of the residential energy use according types of consumption. This would be a part of planning activities. Mr. Saba suggested looking at the City's comprehensive plan relative to energy use in the City and the bikeway/walkway system. Although the plan is quite general, it does provide direction for the City. ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 26, 1987 PAGE 4 Ms. Wicklacz agreed that the plan is quite general and covers many items. The current comprehensive plan was written in 1980 and will be revised starting 1988. The plan is generally based on the commissions' work plans. Mr. Wicklacz provided several copies £or members to review and stated she would get copies to members who did not already have one. Mr. Sielaff asked if there was something for which the commission could � take the initiative. - - Mr. Saba felt there was, but it may not apply for things eligible in the grant. Mx. Saba was not sur� how the commission could tie the comprehensive plan to the grant requirements. Mr. Sielaff indicated that the ideas being discussed required a good deal of planning and suggested approaching from a planning standpoint. Mr. Saba felt there should be a consistent level of improvement with anything the City does in addition to the maintenance. Mr. Sielaff asked to what extent the comprehensive plan reflects what the citizens want. Ms. Wicklacz stated that residents opinions are obtained through public hearings. Mr. Sielaff asked if citizens are involved in future planning. Ms. Wicklacz was not sure if anything like that had been done. Generally, citizens provide input at public hearings. Mr. Sielaff also felt that improvements should be made in addition to maintenance. Although Fridley is mainly developed, there are improvements that can be made. Mr. Sielaff s�ggested looking at what the cUrrent situation is, gathering further information and making a recommendation for improvements. Mr. Saba thought other cities should be contacted to see what they do. He noted that other cities have overpasses for biking/walking safety. Ms. Wicklacz noted that an overpass had been proposed for Highway 47, but that this was something proposed for the futuze. Mr. Saba indicated the data presented showed that overpasses were not used. Ms. Wicklacz indicated that even if the commission recommended upgrading the comprehensive plan for further development of the bikeway system, there are people who would prefer to see the funds spent elsewhere. Ms. Wicklacz summarized the topics discussed for the grant as improvement of the bikeway/walkway system and radon contamination. In order to submit a proposal, the commission would need to specify what they would be doing and the costs involved. Mr. Sielaff £elt that planning, while difficult to establish a cost, needed to be included. ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 26, 1987 PAGE 5 Mr. Bondow felt planning important, but it is difficult to put into a form for a grant. He suggested planning be done through the workplan and that radon be included in the grant application. Mr. Saba felt that the commission should do both and put into one proposal. Mr. Ehlers suggested the possibility of purchasing 500 radon detectors and allocate one for each block for taking radon readings. He also suggested ` selling detectors to residents. Mr. Saba thought the City could receive a discount if purchasing 500 radon detectors. However, selling detectors creates problems with liability for the units. IL is better to allow residents to use the detectors for testing purposes. A statician could be contacted to find out what a representative number would be and perhaps be contracted to pUt together the results. Mr. Sielaff expressed concern about becoming an alarmist, Ms. Wicklacz thought iY would be interesting for the City to volunteer to be part of a test for the MPCA and also expressed concern about causing alarm. Ms. Wicklacz indicated that a grant proposal would need to be prepared, presented to the Planning Commission�and the City Council for approval before June 17. This is a tight schedule. Mr, Sielaff asked whaL would happen if the DPS does not given the money away. Ms. h'icklacz said cunds could be set aside for future grants, given to the university, or opened for another grant cycle. It depends on the rules. Ms. Wicklacz noted that there are other things the commission could do without a grant. The bikeway/walkway may have run out of funds or may have had funds reallocated. Ms. Wicklacz could review the budget to see what has happened and speak with Mr. Flora, Department of Public Works, to see what is planned. Mr. Saba asked for a recommendation. There being no motion, the commission agreed to forego a grant proposal at Lhis time. Ms. Wicklacz stated she would contact the DPS to see what else wi11 be available. Mr. Saba asked commission members to review the comprehensive plan. 3. 02HER BUSINESS a. Mr. Saba stated that at the Planning Commission meeting members had discussed and listed theii top ten problem areas in the city or what they would like to see different. Some items discussed were improvements at the Moore Lake area including the park and the appearance in general, Eisenhower Park, and the flood plain areas. Ms. Wicklacz indicated that the City is working to develop the Riverview Heights Park area. ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 26� 1987 Mr. Saba felt that future plans should include improvements. b. Agenda items for the June 23rd meeting include: 1) Radon contamination PAGE 6 a) Mr. Saba will contact KSTP to obtain a videotape of their . presentation on radon. - - b} Mr. Sielaff will contact Charles Lane, MPCA, to see if he has infotmation on radon. 2) Review the comprehensive plan 3) Update on grant information ADJOUP.hMENT MOTIOR' by Mr. Bondow, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to adjourn the meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON DECLARED THE MAY 26, 1987, ENERGY C�MMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:05 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Q,G�i�vr�/ �'G'-� Lavonn Cooper Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEY SPECIAL HUMAtJ RESOURCES CONUIISSION MEETIIJG MAY 28, 1987 CAtL TO ORDER: Chairperson Sherek called the May 28, 1987, Special Human Resources Commission meeting to order at 7:07 p.m. ROLL CALl.: Menbers Present Menbers A6sent: Otlters Preseat: 5ue Sherek, Dick Storla, francis van Dan Claudia Dodge, Paul Westby Bill Hunt, Assistant to the City Flanager Jesse Ellingworth, North Suburban Consumer Advocates for the Handicapped, Inc. Pat Prinzevalle, Alexandra House Boh Friis, Alexandra House Elaine Vangerud, Anoka County Comnunity Action Program, Inc. Darlene Zurowski, 5enior Outreach Worker Jan Dean, Hot lteals for Shut-Ins, Inc. � Connie Thonpson, Fridley Senior Center Paul Vick, North Suburban Center for the Arts Dorothy Hagen, Senior art student Rosemary Byrnes, S.A.C.A. Dick Young, S.A.C.A. President Joan Ragan, Church of St. William Terri Melnychenko, North Suburban Counseling Center Lucy Mickman, Family Life Mental Health Center James Cox, Family Life Mental Health Center Lee Carlson, Central Center for Family Resources COf45IDERATIOtV OF PRESENTATIONS BY APALICANTS FOR 1987 CDBG FUNDS: Ms. Sherek stated the purpose of this meeting was to get answers to the questions raised by the Commission and then to have the organizations bhiefiy give an outline of their program. North Suburba� Consumer Advocates for the Handicapped, Inc. Jesse Elli�orth, Part-time Director Mr. E7lingworth stated he wou7d like to thank the Commission for allowing him to come before the Commission for the third year. He stated he would address the questions raised by the Comnission. SP[CIAL HUHAN RESOURCES COMP4ISSION MEETING, t4AY 28, 1987 PAGE 2 1. What are the boundaries of your service area? Mr. Ellingworth stated their title "North Suburban" couid mean a broad area in the Twin Cities area, but because they have their office in Fridley at Islands of Peace Park and because the County has been cooperating with them and given them a 10 hr,/week part-time staff person and has been supportive in many ways, they pretty nuch do their work in Anoka County. They also have an advi5ory board with representatives throughout the County. 2. How do you define "information and referral"? �4r. Ellingworth stated right now they have a lot of information at their office that is unfiled, unorganized, and that was not getting out to people. They would like to get this information put together so when they � t calls for information, that information would be readily available. If they get the funding to hire a specialist, that person's main job would be to organize this information and get it to the point where it was very accessible; then to reach out and look for other information they might not already have. As far as referral, if they cannot find the information required, they do refer people on to someone else. 3. liow does this differ from First Call for Help? Mr. Ellingworth stated usually any calls First Call for Help receives regarding needs for the handicapped, they will refer to North Suburban Consumer Advocates for the fiandicapped. So, the purpose of ��orth Suburban Consumer Advocates as opposed to First Call for Help would be to localize the information. First Call for Help has volunteers who are not always that informed on what is happening within a comaunity. He stated North Suburban Consumer Advocates needed more information on the more basic needs that people have and have tf�at information available for those people. How many Fridley residents did you serve in your last reporting year? In what ways were they served? Mr. Ellingworth stated they are not a client-oriented organization. They are a self-advocacy type organization involved with issues such as transportation, housing, attitude and architectural barriers. They support I�andicapped Aware- ness t•leek and support t4s. tdheelchair F1innesota. They help get people with Jisabilities visible in the community. He stated he could not specifically give a number on how many people they have served in Fridley, 6ecause it was very difficult to determine. However, they do have an office in Fridley, Redeemer Lutheran Church in Fridley has helped them alot with Ilandicapped Awareness Week, and they have two disabled volunteers at Fridley Convalescent Home who do a lot of stapling, collating, etc., for them. Mr. Ellingworth stated they have an excellent person, Roger Blohm, from Fridley who is on their advisory board. He stated these �re all things that affect the City of fridley indirectly. What helps one person with a disability in one area of the County was certainly going to help another person with a disability in another area of the County. � SPECIAL HUIIAN RESOURCES COPIMISSIOPI MEETING MAY 28 1987 PA6E 3 5. How do you arrive at $2,500 as Fridley's share of a$4,638 program? Mr. Ellingworth stated the money would be used to get the information and referral thing going. The amount $2,500 was picked because they want to localize this information. fdr. Ellingworth stated if they get the initial funding, maybe half of it or more, they could get a person to start gathering and organizing informa- tion and then after that start developing and training volunteers to reach out for additional money. 6. �lhat would the funds from Fridley be used for? Mr. Ellingworth stated he had already answered that question. They hope to be able to organize and gather information and localize it so information is available to all Fridley residents, particularly those with disabilities. Since their office was in Fridley, Fridley will probably utilize the infor- mation more than a lot of other cities in the County. 7. What impact would this have on the residents of Fridley? Mr. Ellingworth stated this was a hard question to answer. Indirectly, he thought they were enhancing the lives of many, many people with disabilities throughout the County, and Fridley was certainly an important part of that. Mr. Storla stated that regarding information and referral, t1r. Ellinqworth had described referral as referring someone if they did not have the information readily a�eailable. Mr. Ellingworth stated that was certainly part of it, but their overall purpose was to act as an advocate. Once any referral comes from a disabled person, they do follow up on it and make sure that person gets the information needed. Ms. Sherek asked how North Suburban Consumer Advocates for the Handicapped would publicize their information and referral service, other than through their membership who presumably would already know about it. Mr. Ellingworth stated that in developing their information and referral service, they would probably draw in some of the other organizations. Even though they focus on the physical handicapped, they are an umbrella group for all persons with disabilities. Therefore, they would plan a brochure to get out into the coRnnunity through schools, churches, their Speakers Bureau, etc. They will also keep track of the number of calls they receive, but they need a paid staff person to do these kinds of things. Ms. Sherek asked if they were talking about having a full-time paid staff person. ' Mr. Ellingworth stated, no, they were looking at only 10 hrs. a week to begin with to start organizing and gathering information. After the first six months, e SPECIAL HU11AN RESOURCES COMP1ISSION MEETING, MAY 28, 1987 PAGE 4 they hope that person will able to train volunteers, have the files in order, and possibly even computerize the information in the future. Mr. Ellingv+orth stated there was the possibility uf setting up a satellite office with the Center for Independent Living and working closely with them. Alexandra liouse, Inc. Pat Prinzevalle, Executive Director Bob Friis, Board Member and Fridley Police Officer Ms. Prinzevalle stated she would like to thank the Canmission for their continued support of Alexandra House in the past and for the Cannission's time at this meeting. She stated she would answer the questions raised by the Comnission. l.a. How many Fridley residents were served in your most recent completed reporti�g year, both in your residence program and in your othe� programs? t1s. Prinzevalle stated that as was stated in the proposal, in 1986, they provided shelter for 16 Fridley women and children. The average length of stay a+as between 14-16 days. Regarding the "other programs", at this time, they do not have a breakdown of the amount of residents or separate city residents with each specific service or program of Alexandra House; liowever, on page 3 of the proposal it said that in 1987-88 they would provide shelter to 25 women and children from Fridley and provide informa- tion support and referral to approximately 150 women and children and that they would provide advocacy and support services to non-sheltered residents, approximately 18� from Fridley. b. How nany in each category were AFDC recipients? t1s. Prinzevalle stated they have just this year begun to keep track of the information and referral and support services on specific residents of specific cities. Last year it was not done and apparently has not been done in the past. They are not only seeing about 85a are AFDC women and families, but they are also seeing a low percentage of women and children tiaho are above AFDC income guidelines but are considered low income because they work but receive mininum wage. About 15% are lovr income women and families that are not on AFDC. 3. lJhat services or referrals are provided for the battering spouse? 14s. Prinzevalle stated she had talked to Officer Friis and their Interven- tion Project Coordinator about this. In January 1987 they started an intervention project in the City of Blaine working with the Criminal Justice System in responding to domestic assaults, and the answer they came up with was basically working with the Criminal Justice System in the jails. 4lithin the intervention project was built in a part where there will be male volunteers who will visit the assailants in jail the morning after their arrest and will provide information and referral on where they can seek cou�seling or other resources. Alexandra House does not provide direct services to the batterers. 4, Witat would the funds from Fridley be used for? Ms. Prinzevalle stated the funds would mostly be used for women and their fdmilies who are inelgible for per diem assistance. They are seeing an increaSing number of those women coming into the shelter because the etigibiTity requirements for general assistance per diems was becoming more stringent. The income guidelines were becoming lower. So, worY.ing poor v�omen were not eligible for per diems. S. Ylhat impact would this have on the residents of Fridley? Ms. Prinzevalle stated the money would supply the shelter and support services from the shelter to women and children who are coming in from Fridley. It would be a support that has been recognized throughout most of the cities in Anoka County because Alexandra House was the only shelter for battered women in Moka County. Mr. van Dan asked if there was any publicity proliferation of the existence of the shelter to a newly battered woman. For example, when the Police Department was called to a home where a woman has been battered, do they advocate or advise the victim to go to the Alexandra House? Ms. Prinzevalle stated Alexandra House has cards that are made available to the Police Departments in Anoka County to give on a domestic assault. It was her understanding that the cards were utilized. They have had excellent cooperation with the Police Departments in Moka County. Officer Friis stated every officer carries about one-half dozen of the cards in fiis/her pocket daily. When they go to not only a violent and domestic situation, but any time there was any kind of confrontation between family mer�ers, the officers wi11 leave this card. Even in situations where people do not want any referral, the officer will leave it on the table. So, they are getting the information out to these people. The police officer will take the woman andJor her family to a shelter that day if she wants to go. A large per- centage of the time Alexandra House is filled but Alexandra House will make arra�gements to have the woman and/or children transported to another available shelter. Ms. Prinzeualle stated Alexandra House has a 95% occupancy. Overall, in the metropolitan area, seven shelters have a 97% occupancy so there was not a lot of room and not a lot of resources. Ms. Prinzevalle stated that along with this, they have a cortmunity education program and in 1986 they provided community education either by a stand-up presentation, a slide/tape shovr, or informal discussion to over 2,000 Anoka County people. They know there are many more they need to reach, particularly to those in the northern part of the County. Fridley was a comnunity they come to often to do comnunity education. SPECIAL HUI1AN RESOURCES COMMISSION �1ELTING, MAY 28, 1987 PAGE 6 Mr, van Dan stated that under the indirect services to the battering spouse, does Alexandra House cooperate in requesting a peace bond, if necessary, against the battering spouse? Ms. Prinzevalle stated they do. She stated that historically since Alexandra House has been in operation, the advocacy and support services that are provided through the shelter itself and also with their outreach program which works with former residents, assists wor�en in getting orders for protection. The inter- vention project will also assist in receiving order for protection. They cooperate very closely with the Criminal �ustice System at the Court House in the City of Anoka. Mr. Hunt asked Ms. Prinzevalle to send statement as that was not included with budget requested by the Cort�nission. the Commission a year end 1986 balance the 1986 financial iP2port and 1987 Ms. Prinzevalle stated she would send that out to the Commission. Association for Retarded Citizens of Anoka Countv Mr. Hunt stated t4r. Robert Brick was not able to attend the meeting because of a family energency. Mr. Brick stated he would submit information in writing to the Conmission as soon as possible. Mr. Hunt stated he would mail that informa- tion out to the Commission as soon as he received it. Anoka County Comnunity Action Program, Inc. Elaine Vangerud, Coordinator of the Senior Programs at Anoka County CAP and Supervisor of the Outreach Workers Darlene Zurowski, Senior Outreach Worker for Fridle Ms. Elaine Vangerud stated both she and Ms. Zurowski would respond to the questions by the Commission. 1. What do you see as the long term relationship between the Senior Outreach Worker and the Fridley Senior Citizens Center, the designated focal point for senior services in Fridley? fds. Zurowski stated that due to the fact that the Outreach Worker's position was dependent on a grant which was allotted for a nine month period and renewed annually, it was difficult to talk "long term". As long as there was an Outreach Worker in Fridley, there needed to be a strong relationship between the Senior Center and the Outreach Worker. Ms. Zurowski stated that regarding focal points in Fridley, she felt the Fridley site has been somewhat fragmented in the past and was just now "coming together". Focal points are meant to be the center of activity for events/services. They are to be a source of refferal. The CAP Agency and the Senior Center need to network closely, yet each needs to be a separate SPECIAL HUHAN RESQURGES COMMISSIOtJ MEETING, MAY 28, 1987 PAGE 7 eniity due to the nature of outreach. It would be good if the Outreach Worker would have designated day(s) and hour(s) to be available to seniors '�i.a the Center as well as Village Green Apartments. She stated she had her office in her home but did go to the Senior Center on a regular basis. Ms. Vangerud stated the goals of the Senior Center and Anoka County CAP Senior'Outreach were differenY but cou]d be wmplementary. For the most part, the Senior Center has been involved in providing services within a �tructured area for people able to get to the Center. Anoka County CAP Senior 0utreach works on a one-to-one basis in the homes of the frail, iso7ated, lav income seniors who often are struggling to survive, These seniors do not or are not able to go to the Center. It was the job of the Senior Outreach Worker to help those sen�ors who are able to become members of the Center, and she has done that. Ms. Vangerud stated they have two new aging frontiers--the very old who live longer because of inedication and service assistance, and the baby boomers wha in 15-20 years will be classified as seniors. Because of this, planning must be done to service both groups. She saw Anoka County CAP working hand in hand with the Senior Center in meeting the needs of present older adults. The future seniors may be more aware of services, be more mobile, and may seek out the services themselves or may have no desire to be with groups. There- fore, in the future, the structure of services for seniors may be very different for the Senior Center and for Anoka County CAP. Ms. Sherek asked if Ms. Zurowski had been successful in getting some of the seniors she works with involved, at least in the Congregate Dining program? Ms. Zurowski stated she had. She stated this year she had the opportunity to host a hospitality team at the Senior Center and it came out of a need she had expressed to the Senior Advisory Board that there were seniors out there who were afraid to come alone. In the past, she had been going with these people, and she saw this as a function seniors could be doing for other seniors. So, they forn+ed a hospitality team and now she can call on a member of the hospitality team to welcome a senior coming for the first time. Ms. Vangerud stated Ms. Zurowski has done a marvelous job in getting seniors into the Center. Ms. Sherek asked if Ms. Zurowski had been successful in getting some of the old2r, yet frail citizens involved in any way. Ms. Zurowski stated the older frail srrraors have different needs. Most of the time the reason they are not at the Center was because of health problems. In that case, she offers the services of a homemaker, Meals on IJhee7s, Home Health Aid, and some of the social services that are available. So, there are two different segments of seniors they work with. � 2. What constitutes a "contact"? SPECIAL HUf1AN RESOURCES COM6IISSION 14EETII�G, MAY 28, 1987 PAGE 8 Ms. Zuroriski stated the contacts vary according to a person's needs and/or interests. There are two main approaches: phone contact and "cold" call. Names are taken fror� phone direc�ories, church lists, referrals from Social Workers or the Senior Center, or cnncerned neighbors. If it is a referral, she calls and asks for an appointment. If it is a regular visit, shP will just stop by e.g. a cold call. Some contacts never need to get past the phone call, particularly if ali is v�ell with the household. Then she will tell them about the Senior Center and the programs that are available. Ms. Zuroo-JSki stated her task is to inform seniors of services and proqrams available. Some need health services, others just want inforr�ation on activities. Those needing social services require referral and follow-up. During peak winter months, many hours are spent filling out applications for energy assistance. t4s. Uangerud stated that in the grant request, when she used the word "contact" she was talking about someone t4s. Zurowski has contacted face to face and done an intake on. She had brought along an intake form to show the Commission members what kind of information P1s. Zurowski has gotten when she makes the call. There is quite a bit of information on the intake form. After a month, she will add this all up and send the statistics to P1r. 11unt, so the City knavs how many �niors Ms. Zurowski has seen, their ages, their needs, etc. Ms. Zurowski stated she had brought in a map with pins on it showing where the first 400 people in her file were located in Fridley. As far as nurnbers, the average age was 70-74, 1,047 females, 541 males, 1,571 Caucasian, 2 Black, and 2 Asian. 622 living alone and just a few living with far�ilies. Ms. Zurowski stated that generally most of the seniors in fridley were above the poverty level. The typical referrals were Home Health Aid, senior transportation, Homemaker, Befrienders, and the Hospice Program. Ms. Zurowski stated she had called the Anoka County Coroner's Office and found out there was one suicide since Jan. 1987, a male senior, age 70, from Fridley. Ms. Zurowski stated she believed the outreach has helped in many ways. She has come across people who have lost a spouse and sometimes they are so caught up in their grief that they cannot get out of it by themselves. Just having saneone come in to encourage them and help them and support them o-�as a very valuable thing for the community. 3. What impact would this have on the residents of Fridley? Ms. Zurowski stated the greatest impact, of course,was on: (1) frail elderly; (2) widows/widowers; (3) isolated seniors; (4) community at large. She felt the community at large benefits because if she makes a referral, for example, to have a painter paint the house, the neighbors are pleased SPECIAL HUttAN RESOURCES COMMISSION 11EETING �4AY 28 1987 PAGE 10 Mr. Storia asked if there was a waiting list. Ms. Dean stated they did not have a waiting list at this time. Usually in the suraner, their count goes down. During the winter, they usually have a waiting list. The meals are prepared at Unity Hospital, and the limit was 62 meals. Mr. Storla asked if they were experiencing difficulties in getting volunteers to distribute the meals. Ms. Dean stated they are, as more and more people were going back to work. They have a lot of seniors who do volunteer to deliver the meals, but the problem was that in the winter, people go south, and in the surtrner, people go to the lake. So, it did become a problem. 4. What impact would this have on the residents of Fridley? Ms. Dean stated she felt itvas very important to keep as many people as possible self-sufficient, being able to stay in their homes, and being able to do what they can, rather than in nursing homes.. Just the brief greeting from the person delivering the meal was very important and very appreciated by the shut-in. This was a service that was not being duplicated in Fridley. Fridley Senior Center, Inc. Connie Thonpson, Senior Coordinator Ms. Thompson stated she had prepared responses to the questions asked by the Corunission. 1. Is a"ride" one way or round trip? Ms. Thompson stated that in this application, rides were defined as one-way and trips were both ways or a round trip. The reason was to have consistency with other applications they might make. It was a system requested by the State. 2. Why are the shopping trips free? Ms. Thompson stated the shopping trips are free through the financial support of the Fridley Lions Club. The Fridley Lions Club originally donated the school bus to the City and as a continuing support through recognition of the importance of giving seniors accessibility to shopping facilities, the Lions Club pays for the rider's fare and the driver's expenses on shopping days. 3. Why don't the fares projected for 1987 and received in 1986 tie in with the respective number of rides? Ms. Thompson stated she had made a mistake. She always thought of calendar year and she went calendar year for expenses and fiscal year for income. She had included a revised program budget that would better explain this ..�.: .. . .. que5tion. Fare projections were based on a 400 rides per month increase for Aug. - Dec. 1987 (400 rides = 200 trips @$.50) (�100/month for five mqnths =�500 fare increase). Projected fares for July 1987 - July 1988 would be a total increase of $1,100 over 1986 fares. 4, t�vt many laver incane residents of fridley will be served by the addition af this service? Ms. Thompson stated that in evaluating the current service they have for tt'ansportation, there are 100 seniors who take advantage of transportation pr�ctgramning,either through the therapeutic swimning program, the shopping �Sragram, or rides to Congregate Dining. Of that, they estimate 95% are lower income, and she thought that would hold true on the rides to the Center. Ms: Thompson stated she has been Senior Coordinator of the Senior Center Sfnce January, and she has seen a substantial grawth in the number of parti- cipants at the Center.- That day she had done a count of unduplicated seniors who had participated at the Center, and the number was 491. If they a�e tooking at 100 people out of the 491 getting transportation now, they are looking at about one-quarter of the people they currently serve that are in need of some kind of transportation to and from the Center or to and from some type of activity. Ms. Ttrc�mpson stated as she sees the Center continue to grow (a five month span witH a full-time coordinator), she was anticipating their growth will continue, peohably,at as fast a rate as it has in the last five years. They are looking at a popul�tion ,af 55 and over in Fridley. There are 4,000 seniors,and they are in the proc�ss of develbping a program to identify the 4,000 seniors in Fridley. Then tfiey mill be-able to identify a lot more of the isolated who are capable of being involved but because of transportation are not able to get involved in the programs. That was why there was a ne�d for a transportation program to bring these seniors in and get.them involved. Ms. Tho�son stated the funds would be used to pay for the transportation service. Ii was her understanding the City did not like to pay for salaries, but the driver's salary was what provided the service. The other expenses would go for vehicae supplies, wear and tear on the vehicle, insurance, etc. By providing the additianal transportation to and from the Senior Center, they hope it will assist';Lo make the services more accessible to Fridley seniors and home-bound senior• residents. Ms. Thorrpson stated Fridley was an aging canmunity, and the fridley Senior Center was attemRting to meet the needs of this aging segment of the Fridley population. Orte of the road blocks was limited transportation. North Suburban Center for the Arts • Pau1 Vicks Director Mr. Viek stated they were a community art-�organization #hat has its base right now in<Apa�he;Plaza. They are involved with the Anoka County restoration of the Banfill/Lctcke House in Frid]ey ort East River Road which they hope will be their iuture'home. SPECIAL HUHAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 28, 1987 PAGE 1_2_ Mr. Vick stated they are requesting funding for the continuation and expansion of something funded with CDBG funds last year, and that was art classes for senior citizens at the Fridley Senior Center. The funds would pay basically for the instructors and the materials used in the ciass. Mr. Vick stated they decided last year and hope to continue �ith classes at the Senior Center as it was more convenient for the students. They have kept the cost for each six hours of instruction down to $5. The cost of the classes regularly at Apache Plaza for the public was about $30 pius $10-15 for materials. Mr. Vick stated he would respond to the questions asked by the Corrmission, 1. Did you hand out an income questionnaire to all participants? What questionnaire did you use? What procedure was used to assure anonymity and encourage a voluntary response? t4r. Vick stated they distributed a standard questionnaire and envelopes so tfie questionnaire would be confidential. In hindsight, they realized they were not encouraging enough the need for people to return the questionnaires. They probably stressed the voluntary aspect too much and not the Art Center's or the City's need for this information, Mr. Hunt stated if the clientele reflects the general pattern of the Senior Center or the community at large, then there would be no question that this application would fall under the income guidelines. Fifty-one percent have to be low to moderate incane. The HUD program does not require the question- naires to be handed out for programs that are geared to senior citizens. HUD considers those program as meeting the income guidelines without the evidence. So, strictly speaking, they could not require North Suburban Center for the Arts to have the quesYionnaires fil)ed out, but the information would be helpful. Ms. Thompson stated she would guess probably 75-80% of the seniors were in the low to moderate income guidelines because they are on fixed incomes. Mr. Vick stated he was under the impression from Ms. Thompson that a vast majority of the students were regular clients of the Senior Center. 2. What impact would this have on the residents of Fridley? Mr. Vick stated he would like to introduce Ms. Dorothy Hagen who was one of the more active students in the art class. Ms. Hagen stated they have six weeks of drawing class and then six weeks of water color. She stated they have an excellent, caring teacher, who knows what she is doing and who encourages them. She stated they all have a very good time, and she hoped the art classes could continue. swECta� HU11AN RESOtlRCES COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 28, 1987 PAGE 13 Southern Anoka Comnunity Assistance R�semary Byrnes, Executive Director Dick Young, President Ms. Byrnes stated she would answer the questions raised by the Commission. 1. What are the scheduled tir�es that SACA is open during the week? Ms. Byrnes stated they are open Monday - Friday, 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p�.m. 2. How many hours a week has SACA actualty been open during the past six months? Ms. Byrnes stated the hours a week during the past six months are 40 hrs./week, closed on legal holidays. 3. How many unduplicated Fridley families does SACA serve in a six-month period? f1s. Byrnes stated they have no way of knowing unless someone tells them they have been to another food shelf. During the past six months, they have taken care of 368 Fridley families (1,472 individuals with enough food for 10,304 meals). Ms. Sherek asked if SACA had a limitation on how frequently they take care of the same people. Ms. Byrnes stated they do, but they do not stick to it. According to Board policy, it was four tines a year plus Christmas, but Board has allov�ed her leeway where there are some extenuating circumstances, so there have been people who have been taken care of 8-12 times during the year. There was no physically possible way that 1'� people can handle hundreds and hundreds of families every month nor have the food for all those people nor would they be able to give out the amount of food needed, and that is what would happen if it was on a monthly basis. They are now giving between 5-7 days worth of food, and they do that all year, except in the smmer when tfiey run short of food and have to cut back. At that time they do purchase faod. Contributions of food do not come in as well during the sumner. Ms. Byrnes stated the object was not to be using a food shelf constantly. If � people are doing that, then they are not taking advantage of Social 5ervices such as food stamps. In the Minneapolis area in a survey, they found people just did not want the hasseY of the paperwork for these.other services. Therefore, a number of food shelves in P4inneapolis have clamped down. Ms. Byrnes stated another thing food shelves are doing is getting people to bring something with their name and address because there are boundary lines. SACA's boundary lines for the past 12 years has been Columbia Heights, Hilltop, Fridley, and Spring Lake Park. Until about 1� years ago, they were giving food all the time on demand. It was seen by the records that many families with the same amount of food stamps and the same number of people in the family were using SACA a few tines a year. Others wanted to come in every month and every two weeks. That was when the Board decided to set the policy that there bp a limit, but there could be some leeway. SPECIAL HU19AN RESOURCES COI+MISSION MEETING MAY 28 1987 PAGE 14 Mr. Storla asked hovr many.other food shelves served this same area. Ms. Byrnes stated there really were not any. She stated St. Williams Church started a food shelf about 1� years ago, and she did not know exactly what area they served. She stated Mr. Young had visited with Joan Ragan fror� St. Williams recently and he might be able to answer that question. Mr. Young stated the only group St. Williams served was the people who live in Fridley. They were giving out no more than a three day supply. Ms. Byrnes stated they were constantly referring people and that was why their nur�bers were so high (between 70-80 referrals a week): 8tre�gives out information about food stanps, fuel assistance, rent deposits (paperwork done at Anoka County CAP), eye exams and glasses, reduced school lunches and other things within the School District, plus people have problems with children, and she makes referrals for ttiat also. Ms. Byrnes stated besides the food shelf, they have clothing, furniture, gas vouchers, prescriptions, and two rent deposits per month. Ms. Sherek asked if SACA had discovered in Southern Anoka County a resource for loti� income dental care. Ms.Byrnes stated she had just recently found a dentist through a friend who works for the dentist. As an emergency service for people who are not getting medical or dental assistance from the County, she can refer them to this dentist. He is located in Columbia lleights. Church of St. William Joan Ragan, Pastoral Plinister Ms. Joan Ragan stated she had the followina answers to the Commission's questions: 1. How oft�n do you buy �eat and what kinds of ineat do you buy? Ms. Ragan stated they started buying meat when they received the grant last year and purchased the freezer. They only had canned tuna and other canned meats available before that. She stated she buys meat as the need arises She has bought chicken and hamburger at s�ecial prices. 2, ttlhat is your policy on referrals on other sources of assistance for your clients? Hov+ many referrals did you make in the last 12 months? Ms. Ragan stated their policy on referrals depended on where people live and their financial income. She has referred people to SACA, ACBC, CEAP, and Edge�aood Cormwnity Center. She has referred 38 people this year. They also receive referrals from these groups if people live in the Fridley area. She will help people outside the Fridley area initially, but then will refer them to a food shelf closer to their home. She stated she does use the Fair Share program. SPECIAL HUItAt� RE50URCfS COMMISSIOP� P1EETING, MAY 28, 1987 ___ PAGE 15 Ms. Sherek asked�how Ms. Ragan dealt with people who might abuse the program. Ms. Ragen stated the abuse seemed to be minimal There was really only one person who was a chronic user. She stated she does encourage people to get other help and other assistance. She stated there used ta be 100 people using the" program, but the number was now much higher than that. She has been taking more referrals from SACA. Ms. Sherek asked if there were any other churches in the Fridley area supporting the food shelf program. Ms. Ragan stated they do not recrive any help from any other local churches. Ns. Sherek stated that in addition to referring people to SACA, did P1s. Ragan mal;e any other social or financial referrals? Ms. Ragan stated she will refer people for fuel assistance, and there was a person in their office wlio refers seniors to social services needed. P1s. Ragan stated First Call for Help does refer people to ther�. Ms. Sherek asked about the hours of operation. Ms. Rag � stated they were open 9:00 - 1:00 p.m., t1onday - Wednesday. If some- one needs help at another time, usual]y a secretary can help. 3. What would the funds fron Fridley be used for? Ms. Ragan stated they would like to use the money for sone canned high protein items besides the meat, e.g., peanut butter and spaghetti sauces. They also are usually short on cereals and juices. 4. What impact would this have on Fridley residents? t4s. Ragan stated the impact on the residents of Fridley would be to help maintain nutrition in their diet and help prevent illness in this way. It will also help to keep food on the table as people look for work to support themselves. North Suburban Counseling Center Terri Melnychenko, Administrative Director Ms. Melnychenko stated North Suburban Counselinq Center was a private non-profit mental health center in operation in Anoka County for 16 years. Prior to two years ago, they were affiliated with the City of Coon Rapids and provided services as part of the city. Two years ago, they decided, along with the City Council and City Manager, that they could operate financially nore efficiently without city bureaucracy involved. So, it was a mutual decision that they would become SPCCIAL HUt1AN RES�URCES COPI�9ISSIOP� PtEETIWG, P1AY 28, 1987 PA6E 16 private non-profit without city support and they do, in fact, operate more efficiently �vithout city 6ureaucracy involved. Ms. Melnychenko stated they provide the same services they have through the years which was indiviclual, marital, family therapy, group counseling to Anoka County residents primarily. They also have psychiatric services available. They have a psychiatrist available one day a week. He does psychiatric evalua- tions and medication evaluations. Their target population was the lrnv incone people in Anoka County--73% of the clients they serve are low income people. Ms. Melnychenko stated she had sent a memo answering the questions asked by the Cornmission. 1. Please clarify your intake policy regarding individuals with limited ability to pay. Ms. flelnychenko stated their intake policy was straightforward and facili� tated easy utilization for low income people. lJhen an individoal contacts them for a counseling appointment, in addition to obtaining basic demographic information and a brief description of the problem they are requesting assistance with. They ask them if they have medical insurance or medical assistance which they would utilize to pay their fee. If their response is "no" that they have niether insurance nor medical assistance, and they live in Anoka County, they inform them that there is a slidina f?e scale available to assist them with their fee. Ms. Melnychenko stated 60% of their clients do not have any health insurance. The sliding fee scale was based on income and family size and ranged from 0-$60. The average fee they have been collectinq the first quarter of this year was around �6. Thp,average family size was 4, and the average family income has been under $14,499. These people are not poor enough to qualify for medical assistance, and they are not full-time employees for a conpany offering health insurance. A lot of them are single parents, single mothers living with children who receive minimal or no support from ex- husbands. The fee n's established prior to the counseling. If the income goes up during the time they are receiving services, the fee will increase; if the income is reduced, the fee will be reduced. 2. How much did you reduce services to Fridley residents at the end of 1986? Ms. Melnychenko stated the dollar total for 1986 for fee subsidy to the City of Fridley residents was $7,303.50. Of that total, Fridley CDBG funds paid for $2,202.00 or 30% of the fee subsidized services. From the beginning of the year to the end, the reduction in services to Fridley residents was 27a due to lack of funding. Mr. Hunt stated they were a little confused on the services given to fridley residents because the money coming from Fridley ran out. Were Fridley residents turned away because there was no more money to pay the sliding scale fee? Ms. Melnychenko stated that was correct. Basically, at the end of the year they run out of sliding scale funds for everyone because the demand for services is greater than the money they have. It was not only Fridley. Some cities fund more fuily; for exa�pte, Coon Rapids funds a lot greater percenta9e of the pec�ple .that are seen, so generally speaking, that cortmunity has more money put in-=and using Anoka County allocations, they can stretch the money a little farther. Mr. Hunt askEd how Anoka County funds were allocated to low income people for the slidin� fee scale? Ms. Meinychenko stated each of the cities that have allocated rroney for counsel- ing, if it is for a 12-eronth period of time, she will divide it into 12 and then allocate it that way so that each month, for example, if the amount given worked out to be $200/month for a particular city, that amount would be billed to the city and the remaining amount above that would be billed Lo Anoka County. This year Anoka County contributed $4i,500 to their proqram. Ms. Melnychenko stated all cities in Anoka County, even though they do not make any contributions, get part of the County money. She stated there was no parti- cular formula for allocation to the different communities. Usually by Sept. or Oct., it has become very clear what their case load is. They know how many people they are seeing, what cities they are coming fran, and at that point if the cities still have money available, depending upon how much money and how much County money is available, then they are either able to take new clients or stop taking neN clients from all the sliding scale conuaunities�so the rs�ncy would be available for the people who are already receiving services. They never stop anyone's therap,y wha is already in the program. Mr. Nunt stated it was still unclear to fiim how auch of the County funds was allocated to Fridley as opposed to other cities or was it just first-cane, first- serve? If l�orth Suburban was turning people away because they did not receive a high amount from the City of Fridley and there are still Anoka County funds available, couldn't sor.ie kind of allocation be made to Fridley? How was that worked out? Ms. Melnychenko stated as she had said before, there was no particular formula they follow. She stated a lot of it was first-come, first-serve. She did not have that"financial info►mation with her. For example, that day she billed for Anoka County residents only--$2,350 of Moka Courtty money for Anoka County residents. She 6ilted $1,227 for Fridley residents with no Fridley maney involved. Fwidley was the second largest city they are serving. First was Coon Rapids, then Fridley, then the City of Anoka, and then Blaine, and then the smaller cities they do,not keep track of separately because the number was very small. She statec it was really very equitable, and she would say Fridley was probably receiving better than T5a of the County money at this time for the first five months of this year. 5he did not think any city has been grossly misrepresented. P1r. Storla stated that when they cannot take in new clients for the rest of the year, do they refer people to somewhere else? SPECIAL HUIIAPJ RESOURCES COMPIISSIOF� MEETING, 11AY 28, 1987 PAGE 18_ Ms. Melnychenko stated they refer people to any of the other sliding fee scale programs in Anoka County--Central Center for Family Resources, Family Life Center; hoviever, these organizations probably are in the same situation. They also refer to Lutheran Social Services or tell people they will see them as soon as funding was availatic a!7ain, 3. How many Fridley residents were served in 1986? Ilow many sessions were held? �1s. Melnycfienko stated that in 1986 there were 105 Fridley residents served and they attended 167 counseling sessions and r�edication evaluations. 4. Ho�+ many of your clients in 1986 met the NUD lower income requirements? What percentage of your total clients is tliis? t4s. Melnychenko stated 716 of the 1,044 people that they served in 1986 met the HUD lower income reqeirements. This v�as 69% of their client population. Far.iily Life Mental Health Center Lucy Mickman, Clinic �lanager Janes Cox, Management Consultant �4r. Cox stated family Life tlental Health Center was a Rule 29 approved full- service mental health center, which has been in existence serving the north suburban area since 1978. They serve clients on a needs basis. They do not refuse anyone for lack of ability to pay. Given the structure, it results in a situation vahere many of their patients are seen for drastically below the full fee. As an example, in 1986, their staff has services in the amount of $?23,000. On those services, they gave a discount to the patients of �42,000. It was mainly the low income population with no or inadequate insurance coverage who receive these discounts. The CDBG funds are used to help cover these discounts. Of course, they are not able to come anywhere near the $42,000 in CD6G; subse- quently, their staff, which o�as a very professi�nal and committed staff, choose to absorb those discaunts through below normal salaries. Mr. Cox stated that for the last six months of calendar year 1986, they saw 35 patients from Fridley. Of these 35 patients, 6i3.6% were low income persons having a household income below $17,700 per year, largely female, largely head of household with an average household of 2.67 persons for that income. More recently in the first tiiree months of 1987, they have seen 17 patients fror� Fridley. Of these 17, 700 4rere low income; once again, largely female and head of household. Ms, flickrnan stated that regarding their population, they serve children through senior citizens groups, couples and families. They are a medical model which means they are a multi-disciplinary team approach. They have two part-time psychiatrists, three psychologists, two social workers, two psychiatric nurses on staff. They have a day treatment program which serves clients with chronic and persistent rr�ntal illness. 4PFPTdL s7l1N MEETIN6. MAY 28. 1987 PAGE 1 hk, Mickman stated the Punding problems that arise all the time are with the restrictiveness of the three party pay. Many insurance co�anies do not cover mental heatth and many are sxtremely restrictive on what they will pay. HP10's are very restrictive. The guidelines for medical assistartce have gone up. Generai ASSistance Ptedical Coverage does not allow any kind of counseling funds and people who are on GAMC are generally single adults and often are part of the chronic population. There are only two providers in Anoka County Who will " accept general assistance or medical assistance, as far as psychiatrists. She stated thet has created a great problem in the County. Family Life Ftental Health Center has always accepted these payments. Ms. Mickman stated she wa�ted to say they were very grateful for the funding they h<�ve received in the past and for inviting them to speak to the Corimission again this year. his. Mickman stated they prisented Mayor Nee with a proclamation for May Plental Health Month a couple of weeks ago. So, during the month of t4ay they have been celebrating with open houses and education to the cort�nunity. Mr. van Dan asked what their maximum treatment rate was. Ids. Mickman stated the maximum rate for a psychiatrist was $95/hr., and then down. It depended on the discipline of the particutar therapist and the negotiated rate. Ms. Sherek stated that Ms. Mickman had stated that when CDBG money for subsidizing sliding fee patients was used up, discounts were absorbed by the staff. Was that for ongoing treatrt�nt, or did they continue to accept additional patients at that time? 14s. Mfckman stated what they have usuaily done at that point was negotiate a fee if the persan can pay a small amount. They have been doing that for years. even before they got CDBG funding. That is their policy. If the money runs out mid- therapy, they have a responsibility to not turn anyone away. Ms. Sherek asked if there was a limit on the percentage of sliding fee patients tfiey wi 11 accept. Ms. Mickman stated the majority of their fees are negotiated, but they have no guidelines and are not restrictive in limiting patients. Central Center for Family Resources lee Carlson, Director Ms. Carlson stated Central Center for Family Resources has been in existence for l years and possibly the main difference between it and other agencies was they focus on the children. They have 31 ongoing children's peer support groups plus ' idu 1 counselin . This ear the were particularly stressed with faniTy and indiv a g Y Y a lot°of adolescents,aged 14-17, who were depressed, and with lots of crisis intervention. i SPECIAL HUt9AN RESOURCES COMI4ISSION F1EETING, MAY 28, 1987 PAGE 20 Ms. Carlson stated waiting lists was one of their primary problems right now. Tfiey have 76 fanilies on waiting lists. In terms of Fridley residents, they are intaking new clients at the rate of 75 families for family and individual counseling plus almost an equal number of children in the children's groups. They were one of the few resources for support services for children. She stated it was quite scary with what was happening with the children and seeing kids so depressed. They are seeing proportionately more than in past years and it was a great concern to them. They are getting many more referrals directly from the schools on crisis intervention. The children are cominq equally fror� Fridley, Blaine, and Coon Rapids so it did not seem to be centered in one particular community. P1s. Carlson stated another trend was that children were calling on their own for help, particularly in the 17-18 year old age bracket or are referred by a friend. The good part of this was these kids are actively seeking help. Even though they have dealt with a lot of attempts, the interventions have been successful, and they feel very good about that. As a society, they have to really look at this because kids are coming across a broad spectrum and they are not just the low income. A tireakdown in the family was part of the problem and the isolation in terms of not having someone to talk to. Ms. Sherek stated that with 76 families on the waiting list, are those people on the waiting list for available space or because there were no additional funds? Ms. Carlson stated they prioritize the children so they have a very minimal number of children on a waiting list. They have maybe 15 children waiting for a grouo. The balance was people waiting for family and individual counselinG. They refuse no one based on inability to pay. They are referring people out who have other options so what they experienced in 1986 was a drop in their fee income because the people coming to them did not have any other options. Their fund balance was reduced by b16,000 in 1986, and they cannot afford to do that again. t4s. Carlson stated she presented the organization'.s concerns at public hearings at the County and hopefully the County will be resnonsive because the County makes a lot of referrals to Central Center for Family Resources. They are also funded 25% by United iday, and they will be expressing the need to United Way in a proposal due to them on June 5. There are just limited resources. Even United Way was feeling the crunch. She felt Central Center for Family Resources was very cost-effective in their services, and they have developed a reputation for working well with the population. Ms. Carlson stated they have done very little advertising as it is not needed, and they have increased services every year. They are currently seeing over 1,000 families a year. ADJOURNP4ENT: MOTIOfJ by i'r. van Dan, seconded by Mr. Storla, to adjourn the meeting. Upon a vo— ice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Sherek declared the May 28, 1987, Special Human Resources Commission meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ��'� l/1/l..I7'qal' ' A Lynne gaba, Recording 5ecretary E LL TO ORDER: CITY OF FRIDLEY HUMAF RESOURCES COI�AfISSION MEETING JUNE 8, 1987 Chairperson Sherek called the June 8, 1987, Human Resources Commission meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Sue Sherek, Dick Storla, Paul Westby, Francis van Dan Members Absent: Others Present: Claudia Dodge Bill Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager APPROVAL OF MAY 7, 1987, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. van Dan, seconded by Mr. Westby, to approve the May 7, 1987, Human Resources Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOSCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SHEREK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. APPROVAL OF MAY 28, 1987, SPECIAL HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Storla, seconded by Mr. van Dan, to approve the May 28, 1987, Special Human Resources Commission Meeting minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SHEREK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ELECTION OF OFFICERS: Chairperson Sherek declared the nominations open for chairperson. Mr. Storla nominated Ms. Sherek for chairperson. Mr. Westby seconded the motion. Hearing no other nominations, Chairperson Sherek declared the nominations closed. MOTION by Mr. Westby, seconded by Mr. van Dan, to cast a unanimous ballot for Ms. Sherek for chairperson of the Human Resources Commission for 1987-88. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SHEREK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 8, 1987 PAGE 2 Ms. Sherek declared the nominations open for vice-chairperson. Mr. Storla nominated Ms. Dodge for vice-chairperson. Mr. Westby seconded the motion. Hearing no other nominations, Chairperson Sherek declared the nominations closed. MOTION by Mr. Westby, seconded by Mr. van Dan, to cast a unanimous ballot for Ms. Dodge for vice-chairperson of the Human Resources Commission for 1987-88. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SHEREK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: MOTION by Mr. Storla, seconded by Mr. van Dan, to approve the agenda as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SHEREK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. OLD BUSInESS a. Consideration of Applications from Human Services Organizations for 1987 CDBG Funds Chairperson Sherek reviewed the organizations�who nad submittea requests for funding from CDBG and the level of fundin� she recommended as follows: - Alexandra House, Inc., had requested $3,000 and Ms. Sherek recommended funding $3,000. The organization has shown a need for shelter du.e to lack of space. - ACCAP had requested $6,915 and the full amount was recommenaed. - Fridley Senior Center, Inc. had requested $6,000 and kas recommended to receive $3,000. Ms. Sherex felt the center shoula receive funding but also felt that the center has opportunities for fund raising and other means of being more self-supporting. - North Suburban Center for the Arts requested $2,500 and were recommended to receive $1,200. Ms. Sherek indicated this center served a small number of participants and these participants could be asked to purchase their supplies or donations could oe solicited from the arts community. - Southern Anoka Community Assistance had requested �5,000 and the Church of St. William had requested 52>500. Ms. Sherek recommenued allocating a total of $6,000 be allocated for the two organizations and asked the co,nmission to decide how this would be dividea. Ms. Sherek felt that the Church of St. William could seek cooperatinn from other churches or organizations in stocking its food shelf. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 8, 1987 YAGE 3 - The Association for Retarded Citizens h�d requested $3,150 and was recommended to receive $i,500. Ms. Sherek felt they had a good idea and should receive some funding to provide "seed money" to implement a new service.. - Central Center for Family Resources had requested $5,000; North Suburban Counceling Center requested $5,000; and Family Life Mental Health Center requested $5,000. Ms. Sherek recommended that the remaining CDBG funds, $11,339, be divided among the three counselin� agencies, the exact allocations to be decided during discussion. - North Subur6an Consumer Advocates for the Handicapped liad requested $2,500 in funding. Ms. Sherek did not recommend funds for this organization because they Yt:e unable to demonstrate how their previous grants were used. - Hot Meals for Shut Ins, Inc., had requested $1,000, �, Sherek did not recommend funding for this organization since Title III funds are avail- able,and the organization has not applied for them. Title III Should be the first choice for funding and CDBG could be a second resource. Mr. van Dan agreed with the recommendation as given. He felt the allocations for the three counseling services should be reviewed and that he had a concern about one of the agencies. Mr. Westby indicated he had previously worked with a shelter in Minneapolis and found their funding lackin�. He felt it imNortant to provide proper role models for children from homes havin� domestic violence and felt co�nseling for children was important to break the cycle of violence that is learned. He would like to see additional funding for Nork with families and children and recommended additional funds for the Alexandra House. Ms. Sherek indicated that an organization can only be given the amount requested and no more. Alexandra House is recommended to receive the amount requested. An alternative would be to provide additional funding for counseling services dealing with domestic abuse and/or counseling for children. Ms. Sherek indicated that the Alexandra House does not have facilities for providin� abuser counseling. Mr. Storla expressed concern that the funding for the Senior Center may hinder plans for adding transportation routes. Ms. Sherek felt that the 50¢ fare was nominal. She indicated that other cities charge as much as $2.50 per round trip. Ms. Sherek felt that the Senior Genter may becoming dependent on the City for funding. Mr. Storla noted there are senior centers that are self-supporting. Mr. van Dan indicated the appropriations are to help meet a hardship. The senior center and some other programs fulfill an enriching program for the elderly. The commission must find a balance for the groUps' requests and the funds available. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 8> 1987 YAGE 4 Ms. Sherek sought a recommendation for the allocation of $I1,339 to be divided between the counseling services. Ms. Sherek indicated that the Central Center for Family Resources has done some tremendous counseling for children. Mr. Hunt asked members to keep in mind that some money will be available in the future from the charitable gambling proceeds in the City. Several groups have expressed interest in charitable gambling operatians and one group has applied for a perm�t. According to City ordinance, 4% of the proceeds must go to charities in the City of Fridley. Some of these agencies may receive supplemental funds if they h�ve a reasonable request. Mr. Storla noted that if the counseling agencies were each allocated one-third of the tQtal recommended�each would receive an increase over the amount received last year. Mr. Westby felt services provided for children and families were important. Ms. Sherek indicated that the Central Center for Family Resources works with children both in incest and battering cases. The center also provides peer groups for children which many other agencies do not have. Ms. Sherek stated she had received feedback from one family pleased with that agency when the counselor recommended less frequent meetin�s. Mr. Westby felt the Central Center for Family Resources should be given the amount requested because he felt their worx witn children and families in cases of abuse and violence is an important service. The remaining funds could then be divided eyually between the other agencies. MOTION by Mr. van Dan to divide $1i,339 equally amonb the tnree counseling agencies. The motion failed for lack of a second. MOTION by Mr. Westby, seconded by Mr. Storla, to allocate �5,000 to the Central Center for Family Resources; $3,169.50 to the Family Life Mental Health Center; and $3,169.50 to the North Suburban Counseling Center. Mr. van Dan indicated he had a problem with the North Suburtian Counseling Center cutting off admissions for sliding fee clients when CDBG funds and Anoka County funds are depleted. Ms. Sherek indicated that this center has been in business the shortest period of time and they may have no alternative. The question arose of what happens to funds if an agency ceases to exist. Mr. Sherek indicated that should an agency go out of business any funds not expended should be returned to the City. u HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSI�� MEETING, JUNE 8, 1987 PAGE 5 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAiRYfi�SQN SHEREK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Hs. Sherek requested recommendations for dividing $6,000 between the Southern Anoka County Assistance and the:ChurcS of St. William. She indicated that she would like to provide some funding for the Church of St. William, but felt they could do more to establish ties with the food shelf community. There are other ways to seek assistance, and the person working with the food shelf could become better informed for providing referrals. Mr. Hunt indicated that the food shelf also depends on funds from the parish. M's. Sherek indicated that St. Williams is not involved in Minnesota Food Shar� nor have they been requesting proof of address for recipients. Mr. Hunt indicated they must clarify if funds granted to SACA were going ' t4 be used for salaries. Ms. Sherek stated that if funds were not spent for salaries the funds would be spent on food items. Mr. van Dan felt that the Church of St. William should be notified as to why they did not receive full funding as reyuested, tiiat we have limited funds, and that they can seek assistance through other resources. Ms. Sherek indicated that SACA has had more time to develop, but also have sought other resources. The pezson administering the food snelf at St. Williems needs to develop expertise and connections. MOTION by Mr. van Dan, seconded by Mr. Storla, to allocate $5,000 to the Southern Anoka County Assistance and $1,000 to the Church of St. William. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SHEREK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Storla expressed concerns about the Senior Citizens Center. Ms. Sherek stated that the Senior Center could be considered a fledglingorganization. Ms. Sherek felt it important that they be able to make appropriate referrals for assistance. Mr. Storla recommended that studying the role o� the Fridley Senior Center be part of the workplan. Mr. Hunt noted that ACCAP is also an agent for other programs. Mr. Hunt indicated that requests for CDBG funds had totalled �47,565 while CDBG funds available totalled $32,954. Approximately one-third of the requested amounts needed to be cut. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 8, I987 PAGE 6 2 MOTION by Mr. van Dan, seconded by Mr. Westby to recommend the allocation of the 1987-88 Community Development Block Grant funds to the requesting organizations as follows: Alexandra House, Inc. Anoka Co. Gommunity Acrion Program Fridley Senior Center, Inc. North Suburban Center for the Arts Recommended Requested $ 3,000 $ 3,000 Southern Anoka Community Assistance Church of St. William Association for Retarded Citizens Central Center for Family Resources North Suburban Counseling Center Family Life.Mental Health Center North Suburban Consumer Advocates for the Handicapped Hot Meals for Shut Ins, Inc. 6,915 3,000 1,200 5,000 1,000 1,500 5,000 3,169.50 3,169.50 -0- -0- 6,915 6,000 2,500 5,000 2,500 3,150 5,000 5,000 5,000 2,500 i,000 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SHEREK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Hunt indicated that the next commission meeting was scheduled for August 6 at which time the minutes would be approved. However, this would delay the funding process. Mr. Hunt suggested that the staff or chairperson be authorized to approve the �inutes so that the recoimnendations could be forwarded to the Planning Commission and City Council for approval. MOTION by Mr. van Dan, seconded by Mr. Westby, to authorize the chairperson to review the Human Resources Commission minutes of June 8, 1987, and submit the recommendation for allocation of CDBG funds to the Planning Commission and City Council for approval. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SHEREK DECLARED THE MOTIOh CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. NEW BUSINESS a. Review of Workplan and Schedule Ms. Sherek indicated that the agenda for the August 6 meeting would include updating the workplan. At this time, the senior center will be discussed. Another addition Ms. Sherek recommended was finding resources in the City for low cost or free dental care for children. School nurses are seeing problems with decay. One Blaine school had only 47% of their students see a dentist in the last year. There is a need for low cost or free care for those who do not have insurance or who do not qualify for medical assistance. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE S, 1987 PAGE 7 'Mr. Storla asked'What percentage of chiidxen with dental insurance see a'dentist regularly. Ms. Shetek indicated that with insurance ths percentage at ihe school she cited 3ncreased to 89X. Ms. Sherek aslced if the people on the No Fault Grievance Commission had received forms. Mr. Hunt stated that new forms were included with the materials distributed at the training session. The present forns needed to be reviewed for changes. He expected to have this done for the August 6 meeting. Ms. Sherek noted that the commission had not yet looked at the swimming pool ordinance and the waterway issue. The commission can look at v.�b.at other cities include in their ordinances and how they differentiate between above ground and in ground pools. The question regarding waterways pertains to hazards posed by the natural waterways in the City. A recommendation is sought to enhance safety on public waterways. These ,�wo items will be included on the agenda for the September meetin�. Ms. Sherek requested that the data utilization policy be reviewed at the August meeting. Mr. Hunt indicated that a review of all records will be done. There is a question of how people get information upon request and a question arises with the adoption of new data bases. How can additions be made : to the data base and not have someone hurt by the information? Ms. Sherek indicated that the dissemination of information is a problem -in.that there is not a standard way for st�ff to handle it. The City must be careful about the amount of information available and what is given out or provided access to. Ms. Sherek indicated the workplan would be extended at the next meeting. If inembers have any ideas, these will be discussed on August 6. b. Attachments Mr. Hunt referred to the attachment in the agenda, the letter from Representative Gerry Sikorski and his attempt to keep CDBG funded. Members were asked to support his efforts. Mr. Hunt indicated that the Regional Transit Board is holding a public hearing at this time, June 8. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 8, 1987 PAGE 8 ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Mr. Westby, seconded by Mr. Storla, to adjourn the meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SHEREK DECLARED THE JUNE 8, 1957, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:50 P.M. Respectfully submitted, C/!/L��i/i�� 6�'��/1J Lavonn Cooper ' Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEY APPEALS COt1MISSION MEETING, JUNE 9, 1987 CAL�L TO ORDER: - Cheirperson Betzold called the June 9, 1987, Appeals Commission meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. • ROLL CALL: Members Present: Donaid Betzold, Alex Barna, Jerry Sherek, Diane Savaqe, Kenneth Vos t4enbers Absent: tJone Otf�ers Present: Darrel Clark, City of Fridley Marlene & Lawrence Peka, 5932 - 5th St. td.E. Frank & Muriel Sharpe, 5924 - Sth St. tJ.E. Plancy Jorgenson, Councilperson-at-Large APPROUAL OF t�AY 26, 1987, APPEALS COFI�IISSIOi� MItJUTES: MO_TZO.l BY MR. SHEREK� SECONDED BY f4R. BRRNR� TO APPROVE THE MAY 26� 1987� RPPEALS COf?f1ISSION MINUTES AS 47RITTEN. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� CHAZRPERSON BEY'ZOLD DECLARED TfiE MOTZO�"J CARRIED UNANIA:OUSLY, 1. COIISIDERATIO�J OF A UARIANCE REQU[ST VAR i�87-21_, BV MURIEL At�D FRAtlK SHARPE AI� MOTION BY DR. VOS� SECONDED BY MP.. BRRNA� TO OpEN TXE PUBLIC HEARING. UPO.N A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THF. PUBLIC HEARING OPEN RT 7:33 P.Af, Chairperson Betzold read the Administrative Staff Report: AD�1I��ISTR/1TIVE STAFF REPORT 5924 - 5TH STREET �J.E. VAR #87-21 A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERUED BY REQUIRE19Et�T: Section 205.07.03, D, 2b, requires a side yard of 5 feet between an attached accessory building or use and side property lines. APPEALS C0�IMISSIOIJ MEETIIJG, JUNE 9, 1987 PAGE 2 The public purpose served by this requirement is to provide space between individual structures to reduce conflagration of fire, to provide access to the rear yard for emergencies, and to limit the ` condition of crowding in the residential neighborhood. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "We are requesting a variance to allow us to 6uild a double-attached garage up to three feet from our property line, for the following reasons: l. lde presently have a single detached garage which is inadequate for storing our vehicles (two cars, a truck, a boat, and a trailer). We feel that the addition of a double attached garage (30 ft. deepl ��ould allow for storage of more of the vehicles in a more attractive manner. 2. The locat9on of our current garage at the very back of our property gives us a 123 foot driveway, which, as you can imagine, is extremely difficult to clear of snow durinq the winter. lJith our neighbor's driveway right next to ours, all sno�� must be cleared in one direc- tion only. This is a several hour task during a heavy snow, and as we become older this will become increasingly more difficult to accomplish. [3uilding an attached garage, as we propose, will cut the length of our driveway by 73 feet to a r�ore mana9eable length of approximately 50 feet. 3. If our house was only one step up from our driveway, we could have a little more leeway, but the elevation of our side door makes it necessary to go within three feet of the �roperty line in order to build a garage large enough to park two cars and still have room for the steps into the house and meet the city requirements for a 30 inch landing on our steps into the tiouse. In an effort to find other alternatives, we investigated the possibility of expanding our current garage. Several contractors have advised us against that alternative. First of all, they will not guarantee the expansion because of their inabiTity to predict whether or nat expanded slab will "float" together with changes in weather, particularly in our sandy soil. Also, they have explained that the slope of our lot could create a drainage problem for us and/or our neighuor to the west if we were to add onto the front of the current garage. Also, this would n�t solve our problem of the extra long driveway. We are very proud of our neighborhood and the steps taken by everyone to upgrade their homes and improve the looks of the total neighborhood. Please be assured that it is our intent to irtq�rove the attractiveness of our house, property, and neighborhood and not to detract from it in any way." APPEALS COPIMISSION MEETIIJG, Jl1UE 9, 1987 PAGE 3 C. ADMIP�ISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: The petitioner would like to both increase their storage cap�city and ` reduce the length of their driveway as stated in their hardship _ presentation. They presently have 23.5 feet between their existing house and the north property line. They now have a 16 foot detached garage in the rear yard which they would also like to keep and may apply for a special use permit to retain it if this variance is approved. The adjacent neighbor's driveway is adjacent to this proposed garage location. If the Board approves thei request, the Staff recommends that the north wall of the new garage have no openings and that it be of fire-rated construction. Mr. Clark showed a picture of the property alon9 tiaith an aerial photo of the prnposed addition. Idr. Barna asked how far the corner of the proposed garage would be to the corner of the neighbor's existing garage. t1r. Frank Sharpe stated tfiere was about 12 ft. fron the back corner of their proposed garage to the front corner of the neighbor's garage. Mr. Betzold stated he had read the petitioner's stated hardship, fie stated the Commission was bound by state law to follow certain procedures and standards in granting variances. There has to be a"hardship"--something unique about the situation or the property that said it would be unfair to require the petitioner to adhere to the code. He would like the petitioner to explain to the Commission what was unique or unfair about this situation that would require a variance. 14s. Fluriel Sharpe stated they could put on an 18%, ft. attached qaraqe without a variance, but because their house was set so high from the drivev�ay, in order to leave enough space on the left of the proposed garage door for stairs, they cannot build an 18; ft. garage. Another probleM was they have a boat, trailer, two cars, and a truck that have to be par4:ed on the property or on the driveway. They feel this makes their property look "tacky", and they are very concerned about how their property looks. She stated they presently have a 123 ft. lonn driveway, and it was very difficult for sno4i removal in the wintertime. Mr. Betzold stated that if the Appeals Commission was to grant this variance allowing the double car garage closer to the lot line, would that essentiallv preclude the neighbor from ever being able to build a double car garage on their lot? This was an issue that should be addressed by the Commission. Mr. Barna stated that, unfortunately, the Comnission could not look at the stairway or the long driveway as hardships. He could see nothing that would stop the petitioner from 6uilding an in-code garage closer to the back of the house right next to the neighbor's detached rear garage. As far as the stairs, to build an attached garage within code, it wouldn't cost that much more to have a fe�� more courses of block and a slab poured level with the house and have no stairs. APPEALS C014t1I5SI0N MEETI��G, JUIJE 9, 1987 PAGE 4 Ms. Sharpe stated their contractor recommended against what Mr. Barna was su9gesting. Their contractor had said it would be poor building practice to build to that depth Lecause of settling problems with holding the dirt t in and building on top. -�ds. Plarlene Pika, 5932 - 5th St., stated she and her husband lived right next door. She stated there was only about 23 ft. from the Sharpe's house to tVie lot line, and it was about the same between their house at the lot line. She stated they were opposed to the garage in the location proposed because it �aas just too close to the lot line, and the area would be too congested. She thought the garage could be offset to the back of the house and be kept 5 ft. off the lot line. Mr. Clark stated that if the garage was attached to the house, it must be 5 ft. off the lot line. If the garage was detached, it can be built 3 ft. from the lot line. MOTION BY MR. BARNA� SECONDED BY bS. SAVAGE� TO CIASF, THE PUBLZC HF,ARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED TNE PUBLIC HF•ARING CZASED AT 7:55 P.M. P4r. Barna stated there really was no valid hardship. The petitioner could still build a good-sized attached garage with no variances. Mr. Betzold stated he also did not see any hardship. The code was recently changed to allow garages closer to the lot line, but he did not think this proposed garage would fall within the situations they were trying to address with that code change. There was room enough for one property owner, but not two property owners, to have a double car garage, and he did not think it was fair to allow one of the neighbors to have a double car garage and then preclude the other neighbor from ever having one. I�Is. Savage stated it seemed very clear that a double car garage could be built without the need for variances. There was also a definite opposition from ttie neighbor. Dr. Vos stated he did not see any hardship of why this was the only possibility for building a garage. There were many other places on the lot where a double car garage could be built. Mr. Sherek stated the plan was a good one. If there was more room on the lot, it would certainly 6e the most desirable location. In looking at the code that pertains to this variance request,calling attention to the cro��iding, both for fire reasons and for the appearance of the neighborhood, the Commission does give variances when the numbers come out in excess of what the code already allows. In this case, they would be enr,roaching upon the letter of the la��, and he could not vote in favor of the variance as requested. APPEALS COHt�IISSI0t1 M[ETING, JUNE 9, 1987 pIIGE 5 MOTION BY MR, BRRNA� SECONDED BY MS. SAVAGE� TO RECOMMEND 21� CITY COUNCIL DENIRL OF VARIA.NCE REQUEST, VAR k87-22, BY MURIEL RND FRANK SHARPE, ppRSUANT TO CHAPTER 205.07.03, D, 2b, OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDUCE THE SIDE � YRRD SESBACK FROM 5 FEES TO 3 FEET TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ATTACHED - GARR6E ON LpT 7� BLOCK 2, BENNETT PRLFIER ADDITION� TXE SAME BEZNG 5924 - STH STREET N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA, 55932, UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAZRPERSON BET20LD DECLRRED THE MOTZO.N CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Betzold stated this item would go to City.Council on July 6, ADJOURf�P1ENT: M.OTION BY MR. BRR.NA, SECONDED BY MS. SRVAGE, TO ADJOURN THF. MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAZRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE JUNE 9, 1987, APpEALS C011�1ISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:04 P,M., Respectful]y sub�itted, n, , yn aa Recording Secretary l f � ` CITY OF fRIDLEY '' PLAtI(�ING CUMt1ISSI0N MEETII�G, Jl1NE 3, 1987 CALL TO ORUER: Chairperson Billings called the June 3, 1987, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. ROLL CIILL: Meribers Present: Steve Billin9s, Dave Kondrick, Dean Saba, Sue Sherek, Don Betzold, Ricfiard Svanda Mernbers Absent: None Otliers Present: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Daryl Morey, Planning Assistant Jerome & Janet P1eyer, 7531 Lvric Lane F�.E. �im Benson, 620 tlendelssohn, Golden Valley Randy 19cPherson, 6880 Sunny slope Dr. Nancy �1cPJaghten, 620 Plendelssohn, Golden Valley Roland Qenjamin, 7810 Universitv Ave. t1.E. Bob Schroer, 490 f:ice Cre�k Blvd. See attached list APPROVAL UF �1AY 20, 1987, PLAWtIING C0�1�1ISSION MIP�UTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by �9r. Saba, to approve the t4ay 20, 1987, PTning Commission minutes as �rritten. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the motion carried unanir�ously. 1. PUQL3C HEARI�JGfT CONSIDERATIQIJ OF A SPECIAL USE PEwiIT, SP �87-10 er Section .., C, 1, of the Frid�ey City Code to allow a second accessory building on Lot 15, Qlock 3, 11elody hlanor 4th Addition , the same being 7531 Lyric Lane tJ.E. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by (1r. Svanda, to open the public eFi aring. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chair�erson Billings declared the public hearing open at 7:34 p.m. P4r, Robertson stated Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator,was on vacation. He stated he would like to introduce to the Coranission Daryl �1orey,planning Assistant. Mr. tlorey stated the request ��as for a second accessory buildinq, a detached garage, to be located in the rear yard. The prooerty a�as located on Lyric Lane between �1adison and 5tfi St. The prooerty was zoned R-1, single familv residential. � PLAN�lI�lG COP1�IISSIO�J MEETING, JUP�E 3, 1987 PA�E 2 Mr. Morev stated that existing on the site was a concrete drive�•aay �ahich leads to an existing 480 sq. ft. attached garage. There was a back door in tliis garage and that provided access to the rear yard and also to the pr000sed gara9e. Presently, a concrete apron extended out the back from the existing garage to the rear of the property. A hard surface extension would be necessary to connect the existing apron to the proposed garage. This was listed as a stipulation. F1r. f4orey stated there was also an existing 6 ft. high solid wood fence around the entire back yard. Mr. 1lorev stated 5taff was recommendin� the following stipulations: 1. A liard surface driveway be installed to the ne�� structure. 2. Garage materials, siding, and roofing to match existing house. 3. 6ara�e to be located at least 6 feet fror� the rear lot line due to a 6 foot drainage and utility easement running the length of the orooerty, and 3 feet from the side lot line. 4. I�o repair of vehicles other than the owner's vehicles is permitted. 5. Metal shed to be rer:ioved upon completion of garage. 6. Garage not to exceed 480 sq. ft. t1r. I4orey stated stipulations i?5 and #6 ��ere added by Staff so that the lot coverage would not exceed 25°6. Mr. Billings stated that at the meeting, the Commission members had received copies of two letters, one from P1r. Frank Gams, Jr., 7517 Lyric Lane, and Mr. Leon Mayer, 7523 Tempo Terrace, stating they urere opposed to the construction of a second garage at 7531 Lyric Lane. f�OTIOt� by t1r. Kondrick, seconded by 11s. Sherek, to receive the letters fron Ffr.�ams and f1r. Mayer. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the motion carried unanimously. Ms. Janet t1eyer stated the reason they want to build the second garaae was 6ecause last fall they bought two cars for investment purposes. They were able to store these cars in a pole shed at her mother's place in St. Cloud. Her mother passed away suddenly and because the property was beinq solA, thev needed a place to store these cars by late fall. They �iant to build this second garage as basically a stora9e shed. There vrould be no business there, no repair work. The building would be idle from about Oct. 1 to April l, because the cars are stored during the winter and they do not move them during that time. So, there would not be any traffic back and forth durinq those PLANNIfIG C019t1ISSI0Pl MEETING, JUfJE 3, 1987 PAGE 3 months, They had originally proposed a larger garage but have ac�reed to go along Fiith the square footage recorunended by staff in order to stay within the 25% lot coverage limit. There would be no noise after 10:00 p.r�. because that was city ordinance in a residential area. Ms. P1eyer stated they do have a 6 ft. fence around their yard so the garage would not be seen very easily. They have decided to 90 with a 2/12 pitch or 3/12 nitch so the roof stays fairly flat and so it will not be very visible. t1s. Meyer stated there would be one entrance to their back yard and that was through the existing garage. That �aas closest to the liome of Linda Faye Dunn, 7535 Lyric Lane. Ms. Dunn has written a letter stating she had no problem with the addition of a second garage. MOTIOI� by t1r. Kondrick, seconded by t4r. Svanda, to receive the letter dated June �, 19II7, from Linda Faye Dunn, 7535 Lyric Lane, stating she had no objection td'the proposed garage. Upon a voice vote, all voting ave, Chairperson Billings declared the motion carried unanimously. f1s. Meyer stated if the Comr�ission wanted to stipulate that tfie builciing would be used for storage only, that would be agreeable to them. Mr. Betzold asked how this proposed second garage a�as going to affect the marketabilitv of their house. Ms. Meyer stated that was a good question, but they did not foresee moving in the near future. There was not much storage in the city, and they have seven cars to keep off tfie street. t4r. Betzold asked about a private storage facility to store the two cars in. Ms. Mever stated a private storage facility would cost about $1,000/year; and, then, �ahenever they want to work on a car, they have to bring it hone and then take it back. Mr. Betzold asked what the petitioners would do if the City denied their nlan. t1s. 1leyer stated most likely they would try to get a larger shed and put that in the back. She stated they would have liked to put the garage in the south- west corner of tfie lot, because it would have been nicer to go fron the existing garage into the new garage, but there was a power line in that corner of the lot. !1r. Betzold asked if Mr. & t1rs. Meyer had any problem with the stipulations. Ms. hieyer stated they did not. PLAN�dIt�G COMt4I5SI0N MEETING, JUWE 3, 1987 PAGE 4 Mr. Billinqs stated the application was for a special use permit in a resi- dential area. This was an acceptable use of the property with a special use permit. What grounds did the City have for denying a special use permit? t4r. Robertson stated the City Code stated: "If a special use permit is granted, conditions must be met in order to protect the public hea}tti, safety, and general welfare." Mr. Morey stated in a memo several years ago about special use pernits, Mr. Virgil Herrick, City Attorney, stated: "A denial would be arbitrary if it was established that all the standards specified by the ordinance and the conditions for granting the permit have been met." Mr. Saba asked what so much hard surface area in the back yard was c�oinq to do with drainage. Will it cause some t•later problems for the neighbors? He was concerned about this much hard surface driveway and if there was a heavy rain or a winter melt, where �oas that water going to go? Mr. Ro6ertson stated he believed the soil was quite sandy and drained well, but maybe the petitioner could address this concern. Mr. Jerome Meyer stated their property YJdS the highest point. The front yard dnained to the street, and the back was fairly flat, and everyone else's yards sloped to the back fence. The home directly behind then was higher than them. He stated he has never had water standing in his backyard. Mr. Saba stated he questioned the wisdom of so much hard surface area in the back yard, and maybe there sF�ould not be a stipulation requiring a hard surface driveway to the ne4i structure (stipulation #1). Ms. Sherek stated with the hard surface areas, it came to over 50% lot coverage with the buildings. She would agree with F1r. Saba that they not be renuired to hard surface the driveway to the new structure, and she would like to see a stipulation that the garage would tre nsed for storage only. Mr. Saba stated if the new garage was going to be used as a garage and they were going to move vehicles in and out of there constantly, then the hard surface was tlie way to go; but since it was really going to be used for a storage facility, then there was no need for so much hard surface. P1r. Kondrick asked if there was any way to have the power line moved from the south to the north side of the yard or underground. lie felt it would be much nicer,if it was not too expensive, to put that garage behind the existing garage. There was already a nice concrete slab from the existing qarage. P1s. Meyer stated that was an option they had thought about, but with the power line, they did not think they could put the garage there. They had not contacted IJSP to see if it �aas possible to move the power line or ho��r expensive it would be. She stated it would he fine if they did not have to put in more hard surface area. Whatever goes in the garage will be there from Oct. to May anyway. PLAi�WIIdG COh114ISSI0N MEETI��G, JUNE 3, 1987 PAf,F 5 Ms. Judy Zimmerman, 7518 Tempo Terrace, stated they own the property in the back of the Meyer's lot. She stated they spend a lot of time in their backyard, and she felt this second garage would be an eyesore to them. She felt it would depreciate their property value. She felt there would be noise back there. She stated they have lived in their home for 19 years. It is a very nice residential neighborhood. She felt this building would make the property look more like commercial property than residential property. The existing olan left very little backyard. Ms. Zimmerman asked if ttie stipulations recommended by Staff tiaould also be in affect for nevi owners of the property some day if the special use permit was approved. Mr. Robertson stated the stipulations were a repeat of the zoning ordinance, so the stipulations would run with the property. Mr. Billings asked if repair work or any other kind of occupation would be allowed in the garage. Mr. Robertson stated home occupations were only allowed within the living oart of the structure, not in accessory buildings. Ms. Zimmerman stated she had contacted 26 people within the surroundinq immediate area 200 ft. from the petitioner's home. She had a petition signed bv 25 of the 26 people, and she also had letters from some of these people with reasons for not wanting the second garage. Mr. Billings read the petition which stated those who si9ned the petition were opposed to the special use permit. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by I4s. Sherek, to receive Petition No. 2-1987. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the motion carried unanimouslv. Ms. Zimmerman stated P1e;ody Manor was a very nice area, and another thing they thought about was that it would set a precedent for others to build second garages or other storage buildings in their backyards. Idith an existinq slab already and then another driveway to a new garage would leave little yard left. Mr. Billings stated that the suggestion had been made that the garage be moved to the north side of the lot where the concrete slab was. He asked Ms. Zimmerman if that would lessen the "eYesore" effect. The garage would also be there to buffer some of the sound. Ms. Zimmerman stated that if they added onto the back of the garaqe, slie could understand that more--if it was part of the existing structure which would at least look pleasant, but she did not think a separate buildinq would add to the value of the oroperty. PLAIJIJII�G COM�9ISSIOP� M[ETIN6, JUtJE 3, 1987 PAGE 6 Mr. Billings asked F1r. Meyer if he had explored the possibility of havinq the garage up closer to the existing garage. Mr. Meyer stated that if the garage was put there, it would be too close to their addition. It ��ould be only about 6 ft. between the garage and the addition. They have sliding patio doors that go out onto the concrete slab. P1r. Ronald Kl�yda, 7522 Tempo Terrace, stated he has lived in his home for 19 years. About 8-10 ft. of their property was on the southeast corner of tfie Meyer's property. The property lines did not line up on the opposite side of the block. He stated he was opposed to the construction of a second build- ing because he felt it would create a more crowded effect that would affect tlie property evaluation in the area. Historically, when the builder of this area started building, the propertv owners were told they had to limit the size of their houses to fit the size of the properties. He stated they di�i adliere to that. lJhen they moved in, they had a two car garage. 4Jhen the Hever's moved in, their first garage was a single garage, then theY expanded he believed with a special use permit, to a double garage. Since then, the �teyer's have also added to the back of the 6ouse. They put the garage door in the back of the garage and put in the concrete slab. !1r. Kloyda stated it was his concern that he LoLld see the possibility of the second garage being used for the storage of not only the two cars, but also the materials used in the Meyer's craft business. Whether this �iould happen or �ahether it was even permissible under city code, he did not know, but it was his concern. Mr. Kloyda stated right now there are tVro automobiles, but would there be even more auto;�obiles in the future? IJould this garage be used as a part of an automobile restoration project that would become a separate business? Mr. Kloyda stated his primary concern, however, was the effect this would have on the property valuation, that this second garage would limit the resale value of not only the Meyer's property, but also his own propertY. Ms. Meyer stated they have lived in their home for 19 years also. When they originally moved �nto the house, there was no gara9e because they couldn't afford it. They got an easement in order to put in a single car garage one year after thev moved in. They put the addition on two years ago and put on alumnimum siding so the garage and the house matched. This second storage garage could not be used for the storage of her craft supplies because she does wood craft work. It idas a hobby. She works with the Children's Hospital and other charity work. There v+as no way in an unheated garage that she could store this wood. Also, they could not do any tyne of repair that would require electrical equipment, because there will 6e no electricty to the structure. She stated she hoped this helped answer some of the concerns expressed by the neighbors. PLANNING COMMISSIOW MEETI�I6, JUf�E 3, 1987 PAGE 7 MOTIO(J by Ms. Sherek, seconded by 19r. Kondrick, to close the public hearing. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the nublic hearing closed at 8:12 p.m. Mr. Kondrick stated he felt if ma_iy of the people who had signed the petition had come to the meeting to learn about the building and what would be done with tf�e building, it might have helped eliminate sor�e of their fears and concerns. He felt the major concern was that the buildinq would be used as a business, and that was not allowable by code. In all honesty, he would rather see the garage moved to the north si�ie. He stated he really had no problen �aith the building, especially with a 6 ft. high fence surroundinq the backyard. Mr. Svanda stated he was not be too crazy about the garage in the proposed location either, but it seemed the Planning Cor�mission had no choice but to approve the special use permit with the stipulations based on the reading of the ordinance and the legal opinion by the City llttorney. Mr. Saba stated he �iefinitely felt the stipulation about the hard surface driveway should be deleted. The size of the structure was reduced sonsidera6ly from the original proposal. He agreed if there was any way the structure could be moved to the other corner of the lot, it would be more aesthetically pleasing. He would recommend they add a stipulation that the structure be used for storage only. Mr. Betzold stated there were a number of things about this oroposal that bothered him. There were a lot of neighbors who signed a petition sayinq they were opposed to the second garage, but yet, for whatever reason, only a few had come to the meeting. He had heard a common complaint that this garage would be used for a business, but obviously it could not. However, he could not really say that all the neighborhood opposition would have dissi- pated if all the neighbors had been at the meetino. Mr. Betzold stated obviously the petitioners were engaged in a hobby that was quite expensive--trying to maintain a couple of classic automobiles. Yet, they were complaining about the expense of storing the cars somewhere else. But, that o-�as the nature of having 7 cars, 2 of which were classic. He felt the best plan would be to expand the existing garage, even though that was not the proposal before the Planning Commission. He stated he could not go along with the plan as proposed. Ms. Sherek stated that in looking at the yard and the plan, her first choice would have been to check with NSP to see about burying the power line and putting the new garage in line with the existing garage. It was going to be costly any�vay to put the garage in the proposed location, and another $300- 500 to bury the power line was not really that outrageous. The concern by the neighbors that the garage would be used for a business, if that shou:�d happen, the neighbors have a legitimate complaint, but there �aas also a legitimate remedy. PU�NNING COt4P1ISSI0fJ MEETIFJG, JUP�E 3, 1987 PAGE 8 14s. Sherek stated she did not see that the Planning CoMmission had any grounds for denying the special use permit, but she really felt the option of putting the new garage in line with the existing garage should be exolored. Slie stated the petitioner was asking for something extraordinary, and if they meant they have to move their patio door, then they might have to do that. Mr. Billings stated the petitioner was covering a lot of ground on this lot with structure and driveways. This vias a fairly well desiqneA neighborhood, and they were adding a lot of garage and concrete that was going to create the ratio of green space to lot size on this lot to be considerably smaller than tf�at on most, if not all, of the other lots in the neighborhood. He would question tiahether or not they did have the grounds to deny the special use permit because of wfiat the ordinance said. He would also encourage the oetitioner to explore the possibility of undergrnund electrical and moving the garage to the other side of the lot and/or closer to the house prior to the City Council meeting. Mr. Billings stated if the Planning Commission does recommend apnroval to - the City Couiicil. he would like to see a stipulation that the garage would be used for storage of tlie automobiles and related yard equipment only. He would like to see a stipulation about not pavin9 the area bet�aeen the exist- ing slab and the neai garage--that the area not be paved at this time, but that the stipulation be reviewed in one year and if there are ruts or tracks in the area in the summertime, then maybe some consideration could be given to paving in the future. Mr. Billings stated he would vote against approval of the special use oermit. He felt the terri "general welfare" was a pretty ambi9uous term, and in terms of the development itself and the nature and character of the neighborhood, he did not think this much concrete, blacktop, and garages was in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. He did not feel this plan �aas the best plan for the site or for the neighborf�ood. Mr. Svanda stated that after hearing the reasons F1r. Billings had cited for denial of the special use permit, he agreed with Mr. Billings and stated he, too, would vote against a motion to approve the soecial use permit. MOTION by Mr. Betzold, seconded by f1s. Sherek, to recommend to City Council e3-n� of Special Use Permit, SP #87-10, by Jerome and Janet Meyer, per Section 205.07.1, C, 1, of the Fridley City Code to allow a second accessory building on Lot 15, Block 3, t4elody f1anor 4th Addition, the same being 7531 Lyric Lane N.E. Upon a voice vote, Billings, Betzold, Sherek, Svanda, Saba voting aye, Kondrick voting nay, Chairperson Billings declared the motion carried by a vote of 5-1. Mr. Betzold stated this recommendation was based on the proposed plan by the petitioner. The City Council could take whatever action they felt appropriate, or the City Council could refer it back to the Planning Commission if the petitioner were to change or modify the plan. Mr. Billings stated this would go to City Council on June 15. PLlINNING COMP4ISSION MFETING, JUNE 3, 1 2. PUBLIC NEARIPJ6: COtdSIDERATION OF A -11. BY Pnr Per Section 205.T5.1, C, 4, of the Fridley City Code to allow a repair garage on Lot 4, Block 2, East Ranch Estates Second Addition, the same being 7710 Universtty Avenue N.E. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Svanda, to open the pu6lic hearing. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the public hearing open at 8:35 p.m. Mr. Robertson stated this was a very complex case. The next three items were inter-related, He stated the first action was for a special use permit for a repair garage along University Ave. on the west side, north of Osborne Road. The property was zoned C-3, heavy industrial. A repair garage was a use allowed in C-3 only with a special use permit. In connection with this, agenda item #3 tvas for a lot split which �aas part of a split and a recombina- tion of existing parcels in order to get sufficient lot size for the auto repair facility (item #2). Mr. Robertson stated item #4 on the agenda was a vacation of two existing easements: (1) a 20 ft. drainage and utility easement; and (2) 1/2 of a 30 ft. street and utility easement. This must be done because the existing sewer line would have to be relocated which runs currently along the rear property line to a point west of it. (Item #2) 14r. Robertson stated he met with one of the petitioners, 11r. Jim Renson, and there were two issues Staff felt should be brought to the attention of the Planning Comm�ssion: (1) the fact that there is no record of an easenent or dedicat;nn for a road connectinp to Ranchers Road, although it was the petitioner's undPrstan�'�ng that they do exist. The lack of this piece �yould make access io these pare2Ts �{iffiCUlt, if not impossible, thereby inadvertently creating land- locked parcel which was not in the best interest of the ov+ner o� the City. (2) the position of the piece of property that was left to the north--an awk�aard left-over parcel which might, in fact; be of little value to anyone unless the petitioner has some kind of development plan or staging plan that addressed the ultimate development of that niece. t1r. Benson stated he was the developer working with the company, ABRA, who will be building the building. Mr. Benson stated that currently none of the property, Lot A and Lot B, was landlocked because it was all owned by Bob Schroer. The piece of land that P4r. Robertson had referred to was now owned by t1r. Schroer. So, today what they were talking about was puttin9 the new repair facility on the eastern part of Lot C and Lot D and the balance of the property was o�m ed by Mr. Schroer. The questionable piece vras �the nbrthern part of Lot A, and they do not want to se� fit bec�me }andlocked. Mr. Robertson stated Staff was recommending the following stipulations: PLAP�NIF�G COMtiISSIOF! MEETING, JUPdE 3, 1987 PAGE 10 '1. No outside storage of damaged vehicles or any parts or equipment allowed. 2, Provide proof of permits from Anoka County to handle hazardous wastes. 3. Eliminate one overhead door on the east side of the building. 4. All overhead doors and man doors to be tan colored to match build.ing. 5. Supply building facade material samples for staff approval prior to permitting. 6. Provide additional evergreen screening of overhead door areas. To be incorporated on landscape plan by 6/29/87, 7. All green areas to have automatic sprinkling. 8. Provide concrete curbing 5 foot setback off building where no overhead doors are planned. 9. Provide plans and specifications for odor mitigation equipment. flown draft._filtration system or better required. 10. Dumpster to be stored inside or in a masonry enclosure compatible with structure. 11. All roof top equipment to 6e screened from view. Mr. Benson stated Randy McPherson who was Presi�9ent of ABRA and Roland Benjamin who owned IJorthtown Nissan and who was also p�rt of the project were in the audience. Mr. Benson stated they have a problem with stipulation #3 regarding the elimination of the one overhead door on the east side of the building. He stated ABRA was a national franchise. This would be their national proto- type building. Alot of thought has gone into the building; and they have worked with the City in terms of the materials for the building. He stated ABRA was in the autobody refinishing business, and their whole concept was to take the auto body refinishing business from the "back yard" type business into a first-class customer-oriented type of business. They are currently located on 81st and University. He stated tfie flow of the business was such that the cars go in one door and then the finished product comes out the other door. He stated these doors are in the front of -the builrling, but they are not sitting open for the public to see. That second duor was only open to take the car out of the facility and then it was closed again, because that was a critical area when the cars come out of the paint room. This door was also a second exit for cars that are being held for repair inside during inclement weather. Mr. Benson stated eliminating either one of the doors alrrost rendered the entire building unuseable. They have tried to mitigate the impact of the PL/INNI��G COMPIISSIOPI MEETI�JG, JUNE 3, 1987 PAGE 11 doors in front. The doors were only 10 ft. by 10 ft. The striping of the material and the combination of bricks and the design will go straight through the doors. He believed the doors as they were situated with the landscaping as proposed for the front of the building and the fact that these doors are opened very seldon would make these doors less visible to the public. Mr. Robertson stated with the upgrading of the University Avenue Corridor, it was the City's general policy to limit any potential unsightly building fronts. So, they are asking for the same thing from all developers along University Ave. in order to enhance the appearance of University Ave. f4r. Benson stated they would have no problem with putting heavier landscaping with evergreens in front of the overhead doors. Mr. Benson stated they also had a problem with stipulation #9 regarding the requirement of a down draft filtration system or better. He stated he would let Mr. 14cPherson describe their equipment. Mr. McPherson stated ttiey do not incorporate down drafts, but use a"cross flow" and it was all OSHA approved. Everything they do is OSHA approved. They just had OSHA through their present building in Fridley about six months ago, and everything was checked. �4r. Billings stated maybe stipulation #9 could be changed to read: "Provide plans and specifications for odor mitigation equipment. Draft filtration system to be approved by Staff." Mr. McPherson stated he believed as strongly as the City that this should be a good looking building. They are really trying to set the standard for this type of industry. This plan will be their national role model. He wanted to bring people from all over the country to see what they have done here in Fridley. He hoped in a couple of years to build a corporate facility and training facility in Fridley, so they plan to stay in Fridley and be good neighbors. The one big problem was they could not eliminate the one over- head door. If he could do anything about it, he would. One reason they have the doors to the south was because of the restaurant to the north. He did not think people using the restaurant should have to see cars coming in and out. MOTION BY Mr. Betzold, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to close the public hearing. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the public hearing closed at 9:10 p.m. MOTIOP� by 14r. Betzold, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to recommend to City Council approval of Special Use Permit, SP #87-11, by J. Benson and G. Bradbury, per Section 205.15.1, C, 4, of the Fridley City Code to allow a repair garage on Lot 4, Block 2, East Ranch Estates Second Addition, the same being 7710 University Avenue N.E., with the following stioulations: PLANNIIdG C014MISSION MEETING, JUNE 3, 1987 PAGE 12 1. No outside storage of damaged vehicles or any parts or equipment allowed. 2. Provide proof of permits from Anoka County to handle hazardous waste. 3. All overhead doors and man doors to match building. 4. Supply building facade material samples for Staff approval prior to permitting. 5. Provide additional evergreen screening of overhead door areas. To be incorporated on landscape plan by 6/29/87. 6. All green areas to have automatic sprinkling. 7. Provide concrete curbing 5 foot setback off building where no overhead doors are planned. 8. Provide plans and specifications for odor mitigation equipment. Draft filtration equipment system to be approved by Staff. 9. Dumpster to be stored inside or in a masonry enclosure compatible with structure. 10. All roof top equipment to be screened from view. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the motion carried unanimously. 3. CD��SIDERATIO�d OF A LOT SPLIT, L.S. #87-04, BY J. BENSON AND G. BRADBURY: Sp it off parts of ot 3 an , B oc , East Ranc Estates 2n Addition, to create three parcels to be added to existing tax parcels, generally located at 7710 University Avenue Id.E. Mr. Robertson stated Staff was recommending the following stipulations: 1. Parcels A and B to be added to Lot 1, Block 1, East Ranch Estates First Addition to preclude landlocking remaining vacant property. 2. Parcel C to be combined with Parcel D for new development-and recorded with lot split. 3. Any further subdivisions of vacant property to require a replat of the area. 4. Legals for lot split, L.S. #87-04, subject to County approval; if not approved, a plat will be required as per County direction. 5. A park fee of approximately 52,841 to be paid prior to recording split. Exact amount equal to square footage X.023. Mr. Benson stated they did not have any problems with the stipulations. PLANNING COMI�ISSION MEETIN6, JUNE 3, 1987 PA6E 13 MOTIOfJ by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to City Council approval of Lot Split, LS #87-04, by J. Benson and G. Bradbury, to split off parts of Lot 3 and 4, Block 2, East Ranch Estates 2nd Addition, to create three parcels to be added to existing tax parcels, generally located at 7710 University Avenue N,E., with the following stipulations: 1. Parcels A and B to be added to Lot 1, Block 1, East Ranch Estates First Addition to preclude landlocking remaining vacant property. 2. Parcel C to be combined with Parcel D for new development and recorded with lot split. 3. Any further subdivisions of vacant property to require a replat of the area. 4. Legals for Lot Split, L.S. #87-04, subject to County approval; if not approved, a plat will be required as per County direction. 5. A park fee of approx. �2,841 to be paid prior to recording split. Exact amount equal to square footage X.023. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the motion carried unanirtrously. 4. COt�SIDERATION OF A VACATION, SAV #87-04, BY J. BENSON AND G. BRADBURY: o vacate easements on ot , oc , ast anc states, Secon ition, described as follows: (1) a 20 foot drainage and utility easement over the West 2� feet of the East 183 feet of the I�orth 160 feet and (2) the East half of the 30 foot street and utility easement lying west of the East 200 feet of the ��orth 160 feet, generally located at 7710 University Avenue Pl.E. t4r. Robertson stated Staff was recommending the following stipulations: l. Developer responsible for all costs associated with relocation of 8 inch sanitary sewer line. 2. Nev� utility easements to be provided on north and south $'f property to accomnodate relocation of sewer line. Mr. Billings stated one thing that did not appear to be consistent was Mr. Benson's statement earlier that the street was previously vacated. Mr. Benson stated he believed the street was vacated, but the easer�ent was retained for utilities. f4r. Billings stated one of his concerns was that if there is a street ease- ment there, that they are not doing something that was going to create problems in the future. Since I4r. Schroer owned all of the other property and this was phase 1 of a long range development, he did not think the City had to worry too much about a street that �•rould only service Mr. Schroer's property. t+ir. Robertson stated Staff would continue to research the accuracy of this street easement before the City Council meeting. PLANWING COM�4ISSION MEETING, JUPJE 3, 1987 PAGE 14 Mr. Billings stated that in the vacation description it said, "a 20 foot drainage and utility easement over the lJest 20 feet of the East 183 feet", so that �aas a strip 20 ft. wide between 163 and 183. Then there was "the east half of the 30 ft. street and utility easement lying west of the East 200 feet", so that was from 200 to 230 ft., so one was not on top of the other according to the description. It might be a concern but was something that should probably be researched by Staff. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to recommend to City Council approval of Uacation, SAU �87-04, By J. Benson and G. Bradbury, to vacate easements on Lot 4, Block 2, East Ranch Estates Second Addition, described as follows: (1) a 20 foot drainage and utility easement over the West 20 feet of the East 183 feet of the North 160 feet and (2) the east half of the 30 foot street and utility easement lying v+est of the East 200 feet of the t�ortti 160 feet, generally located at 7710 University Avenue W.E., with the following stipulations: l. Ueveloper responsible for all costs associated with relocation of 8 inch sanitary sewer line. 2. IJew utility easements to be provided on north and south of property to accommodate relocation of sewer line. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the motion carried unanimously. 5. RECEIVE MAY 26, 1987, APPEALS COMMISSION MIFlUTES: MOTIOfd by Mr. Betzo?d, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to receive the May 26, 1987, p�s Corrrn9ssion minutes. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson_Billings declared the motion carried unanimously. 6. OTHER BUSIPJESS: Reminder: June 17th meeting changed to June 24th, 7:30 p.m. ADJOURtlMENT: MOTIOPJ by Mr. Betzold, seconded by Mr. Saba, to adjourn the meeting. Upon a voice vote, all�oting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the June 3, 1987, Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 9:35 p.m. Respectfully sub it� Lynry Sa?a } Recording Secretary