The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 09/16/1987 - 6922A,ANNIN� CbNII�ffSSION NEETING City of FridlEy AGENDA WFSY�IE.SIla,Y, SEFPENSIIt 16, 1987 7:30 P.M. Locatiaz: Co�cil Chanber (upper le✓el) CAId, TO ORDER• Rni.T. l'AT.T.• APPR�C�' P�tv�":ThT� CDNQ•�IT� ON Tlv�r_rF�: AUGi1SP 5. 1987 PP� FS p auT : CD .uAmrON OF A PECr�r. USE PERMIT. ••• 1- 1S $p #87-17. By GENPRP�. F3�OFr� ppp�pA�': Per Section 205.18.1.C.9 of the Fridley City Code, to allaa eacterior storage of �mterials and equignent on Fart of Lot 1, Auditor's Subdivision No. 79, the same being 4500 l�hin Street N.E. • l: . :: �. �s� u S; •� • ; . •� •t � , � �► • i � � .�1� \. �� : }� V � •UV � :� �M � • �:; .• •+ ��•`/M; •U �p�7n TrON OF A tm SP .7m, L•. .#87-08, Bv W7 .L•TAM ... 3- 3I FIEI`�+EY: - - - To split parts of Lot 11, 12, 18 and 19, Block 2r Moore Lake Highlands, all generally located at 6300 Baker Street N.E. 'Ihe legal descriptions are as fallaas: PAR(II, A: Lot 11, Block 2, except the South 90 feet and Lat 19, Block 2, e�ccept the South 90 feet of the West 140 teet; all in Moore Lake Highlan�. AARCII, B: Lot 11, Block 2, except the North 60 feet; the North 40 feet of I,ot i2, Block 2; the North 115 feet of Lot 18, Block 2, except the South 80 feet of the North 115 feet and except the West 130 feet of the North 35 feet; Lot 19, Block 2, except the North 90 feet of the West 140 feet, lying South of the Nozth 60 feet and except the West 130 feet of that p3rt of Lot 19 lying South of the North 90 feet thereof as measured along South and West lines thereof; all in Mooze Lake Hic�lands. PLANNING Q�Mt�1ISSION NEETII� SEFFENBII2 16, 1987 PAG E 2 SONSTDERATTON OF A VACATrON SAV #87-09 BY GREGORY ... 4- 4G �I9: To vacate the 6 foot drair�ge easement on the north side of Lot 3, Block 2, Heather Hills Second Addition, the same being 6191 Kerry Lane N.E. RDCEIVING 1HE HWSII� & RIDEVII,OFi'�NT AUTHORITY MINUTES T�ii`� OF AUGUST 13, 19$7 RDCEIVIIQG `IIIE FNVIR�INENTAL QUALITY OJMMISSION MINU'�S OF BIZJE AUGUST 18, 1967 RE(EIVING `iHE APPEALS O�P4�IISSION MLNUZF.S OF SEFPENIBII2 1� YELIIJW 1987 (7tiIFR Bi7SINFSS: AIUQIR9I�ENT CITY OF FRIDLEY PLAIJNIIJG COMMISSIOtJ MEETING, AUGUST 26, 1987 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Billings declared the August 26, 1987, Planning Commission meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: . I+lernbers Present: Steve Billings, Dave Kondrick, Dean Saba, DonaZd Betzold, Richard Svanda 1�1ei�bers Absent: Sue Sherek Otliers Present: Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator Jock Robertson, Comr�unity Development Director Arttiur Lei ghton, 4500 F1ai n St, tJ. E. , Rubber Research Terry tlartinson, 4500 t1ain St. (J.E., Rubber Research Roy Goranson, City of Columbia Heights, 590 -40th Ave. fJ.E. Linda Fisher, Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lyndgren Ken Belgarde, 7841 Wayzata Blvd. APPROVAL OF AUGUST 5 1987 FLAtJ(dIIJG CONPtISSIOf� MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO APPROVE THE AUGUST S� I987, PL.�rVNING COMMISSZON N,ZNUTES AS WRZTTEN. � UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON BZLLZNGS DECLARED THE MOTZOtd CARRIED UNRNIMOUSLY. ]. PUBLIC HEARIIJG: COlJSIDERATIOld Of A SPECIAL USE PERt1IT, SP NII7-)G, BY noro occrnoru. Consideration of a Special Use Permit, Sp #87-16, by Rubber Research Elastomerics, Inc., per Section 205.18.1, C, 9, of the Fridle� City Code to allow exterior storage of materials and equipnent on part of Lot l, Auditor's Subdivision IJo. 79, the same beina 4500 Main Street N.E. MpTION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. SVANDA� TO WAIVE SHE FORIIAL READING OF THE PUBLIC HEARING NOPZCE AND OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTSNG AYE� CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE h.'OTIDN CRRRIE➢ RND TNE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:3I P,M. Mr. Robinson stated this property was located on the west side of �9ain Street. The cortpany took occupancy (last yearpf the southerly five acres of the CECO Corporation, which was approximate]y ten acres in size. 7he property was zoned heavy industrial, M-2, and was surrounded on the west side of t9ain Street by other industrial property and single family on the east side of !1ain Street. z PLAIJNING COMI1ISSION IdEETIlJG, AUGUST 26, 1987 PAGE 2 Mr. Robinson stated that earlier this summer, a Staff person, Daryl f1orey, noted that tfiere was outside storage of materials at the site without the benefit of a special use permit. Since that time, the owners of the property have voluntarily applied for a special use permit. Mr. Robir.son stated there was an existing metal building at the extrer�e west end of the site. The rest of the property was open. There aras a concrete block wall interruoted by a cyclone fence in the center with slats. The block arall was approximately 8 ft. high, and there was about 150 ft. of grassy area on the east end of the site. The storage material at this time was approximately 12 semi-trailers a�hich were stored approximately in the middle of the site and approximately 100 - 55 gallon drums toward the western end of the site. I•tr. Robinson stated Staff had some concern about the contents of those drums and that was checked out by the 14PCA. They had received a nemo from Greg Berger describing the materials stored there as non-hazardous. This was obtained from an inspection at the Minneapolis site, and it was promised that the f9PCA would inspect tiie drums at the Fridley site also. He did not knoar the status of that inspection at this time, but it was his under�tanding that these �aere the same barrels that �dere transferred from the Plinneapolis site from which the company moved last fall. Mr. Robinson stated that last December, a building permit was issued to the company v�hich included a few stipulations: {1) there be a watermain loop at the tir�ie of the next building expansion (Rubber Research does have plans for expansion). (2) landscaping and hard surface parking with curbing to be installed by June 1, 1988, or with new office building, whichever comes first. (3) automatic sprinkling for front lawn to be installed with landscapina per City's plan (part of Pla�ning Commission agenda). Mr. 5vanda stated that earlier this year, there was a fire at this location. What was the cause of that fire? Mr. Arthur Leighton, Uice President of Rubber Research Elastomerics, I�c., stated the fire started in some finished goods that were put into cardboard containers at too high a temperature and consequently the rubber cau�ht on fire. This fiire �aas inside the facility. Mr. Svanda stated there had also been a fire at the t1inneapolis site. 41hat was the cause of that fire? Mr. Leighton stated the fire at the t4inneapolis site was currently under liti- gation. It was the company's allegation that a sprinkler company,in attempting to tha�a out the sprinkler system with a blow torch, ignited the wall and the building burned down. Mr. Bil7ings asked what type of business the company was in. PLANt�INr, COhR1ISSI0IJ t4EETI�JG, AUGUST 26, 1987 PAGE 3 Mr. Leighton stated they make base rubber compounds for the rubber industry, specifically they sell rubber that is used to modify GAf asphalt and shingles, they sell the rubber that is found in liardware stores for caulking. He stated their rubber was used for pressure sensitive adhesive tapes, etc. They do not make any finished goods. Mr. Billings asked if there were any odors associated with this business. Mr. Leighton stated that generally there were no odors. They do use petroleun products, some of which have what is described as a"sweet odor". At their 14inneapolis facility which operated for 25 years, and now at the Fridley siie, they have not received any corr�laints about odors, There was an odor that was occasionally detectable inside the facility, but not outside the facili��. Mr. Billings stated lie was on the northern portion of the site and as lie progressed to the western edge of the site, he could smell a sweet ordor cor�ing out of the large door. f�1r. Leighton stated tliat was the odor of natural rubber which was compounded at their Fridley facility for shipment to their Babbttt tire recyciing operation. Mr. Billings asked 11r. Leighton if he could qive an estimate of how many days per year they would be making that particular product. Mr. Leighton stated that, assuming 250 manufacturing days in the year, he would expect they would be making that particular product approximately 100 days. Mr. Sillings stated that at Main Street, he did not detect any odor, and on the particular day he was at the site, the wind was coming from the southwest. Ne did not think that occasional odor would be a big problem. t1r, Robertson stated he would like to ask the representatives of the company if they have any hazardous materials on the site at this time or if they plan to have any hazardous mater9als on the site with the expansion in the future. Mr, Leighton stated they do not generate any hazardous waste and the letter supplied to the City from the MPCA stated there were no hazardous materials at the MinneapoTis site. They have introduced no new materials to the Fridley site that they have not had at the Minneapolis site and do not contemplate having any hazardous waste or any hazardous materiaTs on the site. Mr. Betzold asked if the company had any evidence of break-ins or vandalism since the company moved to the Fridley site. Mr, Leighton stated they have not. Mr. Robinson stated the screening of the storage yard was fairly good exceot for the cyclone fence that was slatted in the middle. PLANWItJG COMI1ISSIOPJ �9EETI�JG, AUGUST 26, 1987 PAGE 4 � Mr. Ro�inson stated he had a conversation with an architect who is working for Rubber Research, and he gave Mr. Robinson a good description of the development plans. It was a growing company, and they do have a priority to build a warehouse facility of 10-15,000 sq. ft., primarily used to store the barrels inside. They would like to continue to leave the trailers outside. They also plan to build some lab space and office space. The Planning Commission might want to consider a time frame for the construction of that warehouse. Mr. Leighton stated he had plans available for the proposed expansion if the Planning Corrrnission members were interested in looking at them. He stated they hope the expa�sion will occur some time next summer, based on recent projections. Mr. Billings asked about the semi-trailers that were stored on the site. Mr. Leighton stated these were old unroad-worthy trailers, used to store raw material and materials that need to be reworked. Mr. Kondrick asked Mr.Leighton if those trailers would be removed from the site when the expansion was completed. Mr. Leighton stated they do not foresee the absolute elimination of the trailers, simply because of the nature of their business. They are essentially in the recycling business. The tire recycling they do gains them some press, but the business they have been doing for 25 years was recycling rubber. IJormally, they get in truckloads of material, they have to go through that material and winnow out that which is salvageable or recyclab1e and that which is trash. At any one time, they will have trailers on the site. He would assume the storage trailers would disappear once they have the storage warehouse; however „ because of the nature of their business, they would be receiving truckloads of material. These would not be stationary trailers. Mr. Billings stated he had noticed that some of the grassy area toward the east end of the site inside tfie fence had some very high weeds. Does the company periodically mow the lawn and maintain the site? Mr. Terr,� Mortenson stated CECO Corporation was still storing some materials on the property and until those things are removed, it would not be a good idea to be running a lawn mower through there. They will be maintaining that part of the property. The Planning Commission members took a few minutes to look at the company's future plans for expansion. MOTION BY MR. SABA� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRZCK� TO CIASE THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE V02E� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HRRING CIASED RT 7:55 P,M. PLANNI(�G COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 26, 1987 PAfE 5 Mr. Robinson stated that if the special use permit was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission,he would suggest that the three stipu- lations he had mentioned earlier be put on the special use permit. The Planning Commission could change the date of June 1, 1988, to Octoberl, 1988, to give the company a little more time. Mr. Billings stated that since they do not have a timetable for the construc- tion of the storage building, maybe they should add a stipulation requirinq gravel and/or crushed rock in the relocated storage area with the provision that tfie City review the special use permit in one year to monitor the progress of the inside storage facility. MQTZON BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO RECOMMEND SO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT� SP N87-16, BY RUSBER RESEARCH ELAS20MERZCS, INC., PER SECTION 205.18,1, C, 9� OF TNE FRIDLEY CZTy CODE TO ALLOW F.XTERIOR STORAGE OF MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT ON PART OF LOT 1, AUASTOR'S SUBDZVISION NO. 79� THE SAME BEING 4500 MAZN STREET N.E., 47ITH THF. FOLLOWZNG STIPULATZONS: j• P2ovide a water main�loop et the time of the bviZd�ng expansion. 2. Provide a lan�scaping and hard surface parking Iot and driveways with curbing. � 3. Automatic sprinkling for front Iawn to be installed with Zandscaping as per City's plan. 4. Provide crushed rock or asphalt in the relocated storage area. 5. Stiau�ations to be accomplished prior to October 2, 1988, or prior to occupancy of the new building, whichever comes first. 6. S£ipulations of the 12J22/86 bui2ding permit to be extended to October Z,-29B8. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE, CHAZRPERSON BZLLINGS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Billings stated the special use permit would go to City Gouncil on Sept. 14. 2. C�WSIDERATIOtJ OF RECODIFICATI�tJ OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO ALLObI COMMERCIAL Mr. Robinson stated that as a follow-up to the discussion at the last two Planning Commission meetings, Staff had prepared a draft in ordinance form for first reading of the recodification of the M-1 and M-2 zones and also the definition section of the Zoning Code which deals with allowing some limited commercial businesses in office/warehouse type of developments. Ne reviewed the drafted ordinance with the Cor�mission members. Mr. Robinson stated Mr. Dave iVewman, City Attorney, had reviewed this draft and Mr. �Jewman felt there should be a redefinition of Class II restaurants, also a change in the definition of "CorrQnercial Recreation". Originally, Staff's thought was to limit commercial recreation to health clubs and g;�nnasiums, but apparently that viould not be a•ngnageable solution in that there really was no reason to make a distinction between hea7th clubs and billiard halls or bowling alleys. PLANNING C0�4MISSION MEETING, AUGUST 26, i487 PAGE 6 Mr. Billings stated that if, for example, a large development decided they needed a"Rapid Oil Change" operation or a"Firestone Tire Store" to service their employees, how would this fit intc, the "Commercial retail and service us�s,,, within office/industrial mixed use bui7dings which are supplemental to and for the convenience of the operation of the zoning district and which provides goods and services which are primaril,v for the use of persons employed in that district..."? �4r. Ro�inson stated an argument could certainly 6e made to that effect; however, the limitation of size and signage wou7d make it prohibitive for such an operation as described by P4r. Billings. Mr. Billings asked wiio made the determination on "which provide goods and services which are primariTy for the use of persons employed in that district„ "� Mr. Robinson stated that once the special use permit was granted, that would be a staff determination in the process of monitorinq each tenant's occupancy. Ne stated the buildings really did not tend themseives to that type of operation. 1�1r. RoLinson called the Commiss9on's attention to the Citv of Rosevil]e's Zoning Code, "Permitted Uses in B-4 Retail Office Service Districts". lie stated that apparently the City of Roseville created a new district wl�ich they are utilizing in their redevelopment areas, and it seemed to 6e specifi- cally directed at the service economy... The uses permitted were rnedical and dental services; offices, business, and professional; private clubs or lodges; motels and motor hotels; mortuaries; research, design and development esta6lish- ments; restaurants over 5,000 sq. ft. in area; banks and financial institutions including drive-in facilities. As discussed in the Fridlev draft ordinance, Roseville also allcwed health clubs; bowling alleys; blueprinting and photo- copying establishments; catering establishments; clothing and costume rental shops; linen towe7s, draperies, and similar supply services; orthopedic and medical appliance stores; pet shops; recording studios; manufacture of elec- tronic equipment and medical instrumentation devices. It also allowed certain things with special use permits on an individual basis such as office service building ; retaii sales and service structures; automntive type uses; construc- tion trade and operat9ons; who7esale businesses (provided the area allocated to storage not exceed 50% of the total floor area of the building); exterior storage of trucks; public utilit,y facilities; automobile service stations; printing shops; off-sale liquor stores not located in shoping centers, etc. Mr. Robinson stated one of the more interesting sections in the Roseville Code was that each building built in this district requires a special use permit regardless of what was intended to go into the building. At that time, all the si�e development, proper landscaping, etc., was critiqued by tfie Plannina Commission and City Council. After that, if any of the uses cited were desired to be part of the building, then an additional special use permit would be required. Mr. Robinson stated if Fridey was to use the type of system Rosevilie was using, they would be creating a new zoning district and �rnuld have tn go 6ack and rezone all the existing office/warehouse developments. It would be feasible but certainly more time consuming. The benefit miah± be that it PU>iU7Ii1f COMt1ISSI0W t1EETING, AUGUST 26, 1987 PAGE 7 might open up new areas for the use of these structures b�� various other commercial busir�esses. Mr. Billings stated the Roseville ordinance certainly provided an entirely different approach than e�hat the Plannin9 Commission had been 7ookina at for the last couple of v�eeks. What was the feeling of the Planning Cor�mission in light of tfiis potential philosophical change? 11r. Saba stated it was possible that the uses would change over several years to be r�ore of a retail complex and get away from the industrial character. 11r. Ro�inson stated that in looking at the tenants in the various office/ warehouse buildings, a number of tliem were very much retail-oriented (retail sho��iroom or retail warehouse}. This change in the ordinance would open up the market to a larger varidty of retai� operaCions. t1r. Robinson stated at the last meeting, the Planning Cor�mission set a public hearing for IJed., Sept. 16. The Planning Commission had also requested that public hearing notices and the pro�osed ordinance be sent to anyone �iho has or is proposing an office/warefiouse development in the City. He stated Dave PJewman had recommended that Staff talk to the Chamber oP Commerce and either attend one of their meetings or invite them to the public hearin9 in order to get the Char�ber's input also. Mr. Betzold stated Staff should mal;e the Citv Council aware that there is a second proposal, and this could be brought out at the public hearinq to see if there is any interest in it. Mr. Billings asked Ms. fisher or Mr. Selgarde if they had any statements to make regarding the pr000sed draft ordinance. Ms. Fisher stated they have been monitoring the progress of this ordinance and have provided sane information to City Staff in preparing the ordinance. She stated they had reviewed the draft in pretty much the same form as the Planning Corra!iission had reviewed it; however, they had not had a chance to revietia the Roseville alternate. � She had worked with tt�e Roseville alternate because she has represented deve7opers in Roseville, but she did not know whether Mr. Belgarde was familiar with it. Ms. Fisher stated they would like to complement Staff and Planning Commission on their deliberations in this matter. She believed that if the changes were made in the ordinance to allow, under certain circumstances, commercial type establishments in the industrial district, it was going to be an overall benefit to the conmunity in terms of marketing mixed use buildings. She also believed the restrictions in the draft ordinance which were extensive were definitely going to limit the type of uses that might be coming up. The parking restrictions were going to make it difficult for an existing offfce/service center project to allow a major commercial user and still meet parking requirements. —� PLANIdIIJG COM�4ISSION MEETING, AUGUS7 26, 1987 PAGE 8 Ms. Fisher stated they were generally comfortable with the ordinance as presented by Staff. IQr. Belgarde did have a question on the hours of operation, and they would like to discuss that with Staff. Ms. Fisher stated Staff could provide the Commission information on the benefits or disadvantages of the Roseville ordinance, but she thought if the City was io go uith the text of that ordinance to create a new district and were then to wait for a deveioper to request a rezoning, if the developer has an existing development and has a tenant that might fit into the develop- ment, tlie City might be setting up a fairly cumbersome procedure that might discourage a lot of good tenants the City mtght wish ta have, As the Corrmissioners knew, the City`s rezoning process was long, and there were not going to be very many tenants that were going to be able to wait for that lengthy prccess. For example, with East River Road Business Center, if Mr. Belgarde had to start a rezoning process after the first of the ,year when tlie City adopted a new ordinance, it was really questionable whether he would go through tliat process. Also, whenever there is a rezoning, the develoaer had a different burden of proof legally than he/she does with a special use permit and it was more difficult because the City would have to look at the plans, etc., and she just thought there were a number of restrictions. She was not saying the Commission should reject the Roseville ordinance, but it would be creating a much different animal. Roseville was creating a whole near redevelopment distrtct, and fridley already had a redevelopment district. Mr. Kondrick stated he would 7ike to recommend that they change the hours of operation in the drafted ordinance from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Mr. Robinson stated that Mr. Newman had a7so suggested that imposing hours of operation might be an unnecessary hardship, and the hours of operation might be able to be eliminated completeiy from the ordinance. ;�ir. Billings stated there was going to be a public hearing, and he felt they should leave the hours of operation in at this time so they can be discussed at the public hearing. Mr. Robinson stated he would send copies of the proposed ordinance to interested developers, the Chamber of Commerce, etc., with a cover letter signed by the Planning Commissio� Chairperson inviting them to the Sept. 16 public hearing. Mr. Robinson stated the public hearing was to get input on the pronosed drafted or�i5rance, and the Roseville ordinance did not need to be discussed at that time. Mr. Robertson stated the Roseville ordinance had been provided to the Commiss5oners for informationa7 purposes showing a completely different approach, ` �� , ' �' �'�� ,; � � ��G� � r ��' �� `�y C,orc�n5ol� , � � < < t-z� .�'�-��- �(1i...-. � �,�Cti-,�c,�-i.� ��, 1�y7 �e��.�� 'a � �-�$GC .�/A iN ST ,U� E,� �v/�/'kCf' /��5� .4!-': ,.. 'is �� f''la��.ti Sr �jt u�3GrF �'r's,=A� � �l � �'�'y s � �ot fr�.�rs SYo � �o � �� ,Y, �, /�� .s�-.z—�, �^e ..�4� �-�'�=,.1,4_ '�"�"��`"'R. .�c� . �`�j:�� ,�;..... i � C . i � % :� `-1 l �:,� :�..-}"7�w : : PLII��NI{�G COF1PtISSION NEETIP�G, AUGUST 26, 1987 PAGE 9 3. RECEIVE JULY 9, 1987, HOUSIP�G & REDEVELOPHENT AUTHORITY MI��UTES: MOTION BY MfZ. BETZOLD� SECONDED BY MR. XONDRICK� TO RECEFVE THE JULY 9, 1987, HDUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES. UPON R VOICE VOTE� ALL t/OTSNG AYE� CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE' MOTION CARRSED UNAIJIMOUSLY. 4. RECEIUE THE AUGUST 3, 1987, PARKS & RECREATION COMhfIS5I0�1 MI�lU7ES: MOTZON BY 14H. KONDRICK� SECONDED AY MR. BETZOLD, TO RECEIVE TNE AUGUST 3, 1987, PARKS & RECREATZON COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOZCE VOTE� ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRPERSON BILLZNGS DECLARED TffE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. RECEIVE THE AUGUST 11, 1987, APPEALS COMI�IISSION MTNUTES: MOSION BY MX. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR: SABA, TO RECEIVE THE RUGUST 11� 1987, APPEALS COl1MISSION I17NUTES. Mr. Betzold ca]led tY�e Commission's attention to the Proposed Variance Informational Handout to be given to people requestina variances which explains to the petitioner wiiat is required in the variance process. He stated Mr. Herrick, the C9ty Attorney, had reviewed it and felt the handout contained nothing technically wrong. This handout was now going on to the City Council for approval. TVie Planning Commission members felt the handout was an•-excellent idea. UPON A VOZCE VO;E� ALL VOTING RYE� CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED TXE MOTION CAHRIED UNANIMDUSLY. AOJOURfUdEtiT: M.OTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR, BETTOLD� TO ADJOURN TNE 14EETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON BSLLINGS DECLAkED 2HE AUGUST 26� 1987� PLANNING COMMISSZON MEETSNG ADJOURNED A2 8:50 P.M. Respectfully subiitted, ` L ry� y Sa a Recording Secretary �,:i +ii��Zf.S'�#�t� r','�.;<4y ��„�•., PROPERTSf ADDRFSS ' �45(1 L�AL I7E'SQ2IPPUk1. ' LOT � ffiA(R _,_ I� �c _„, F121SFi`]T ZAY1l�Yi M-Z , ., SPECIAL USE PERMIT BEINC `,. :s : r ' ;;.�-� , SDCPI(kl�LJE THE OJI7E .;_ t> �' * * * '* * +t * +t * � * .* d - FEE OWNEf�Rp INF ''*� C9. _.{,� �. m-� � SIGI r. ' NotE _ * � �#,�iS��,7 �..� "� C :;�;:: . ° i � �+�r�+,rg � �� c � N� � �..s; � ��a.�' ` - - �`� `'�Ar� .�5'rlh.��9 ?i�9`°'�`. m`.ikf .:x . � . .-"'��. d�c � .� `= r � �1��, k.:, t.`. � � � � �, ' r i� "* x* t ir • s x t•*+t t+r 574-1220 PHGNE # , 7� ! kYidley, l�i� • � ; �,, '�'' p4TE ,�i 8/26/87 ' �;` � t°��iS�r*t�r $r��ta��9� * * x � t t , s -_ � �� s r � k� pg� # 588 0745 - ., Mn.� 55412 � A r�:, , �,,�qC ; 8/26J$�' 7;� 3 z , k}t'�k!"#i�.�`�,lt#�#'!**�� . ��i' a � � �� t�w � � �S w9W.� t,n5�,�r� K r. . �Ah�F �. . , X� Te ��;...,. � . t.. ��+,>,�Hi`c"r'`�'� t,.� `' �,' .?@�` - 2 '°�f .'4"'`�^'r� ��..�^9°�e� � '�i�,�r�� e a � . . . 'y"yn h��{,yy�"t'€��jii/ � M^ '� � � 1F1 SR9 '+ 1 �p§ q ��k+. F � 1 .. Dr � r{,( W "'ro�f+�'f '1' 3i . �fy .� . s .1 ��,,, '� �°r �� Y fj. �Y� � ,y .�'�p� � � � . � ii iY a'� ' �.g � 3� fh . > � '� .ki '��S*`$.'"z'-G �'< Ay ��Y� n<' ' '��a , Y . `k. , ±v .'"'�M�' �'-'� . � �•� t �' 2 .. �# _ �. ."�r'�'�' ..��,�t'r,�SY�� t`��'�',�,^_-�`�;Yt�$ �q.�*. . �"`��.: � m t . � . . � . e AJBLIC HEARING BEFt�RE �3E Pi,Pd�NII� OJt�IISSSON sP #a�-i� lA Central Rpofing Notioe is hereb� given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Conunission of the City of Fridle�+ in the City Sall at 6431 Lhuversity Avenue Northeast on Wechesday, September 16, 1987 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 p.m. fa� the p�rpose of: Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP #87-17, by Central Roofing Comg3ny, per Secti� 205.18.1.C.9 of the Fridle� City Code, to allaa exterior storage of materials and equi.gnent on p3rt of Lot 1, Auditor's Subdivision No. 79, the same being 4500 Main Street N.E. 1�ny and all persons desiring to be h�rd shall be giv� an opportimity at the above stated time and place. Publish: Sept�nber 2, 1987 September 7. 1987 SPE.VE B3LL II� S QiAIRhYiN PLANNING CUMNIISSION SP #87-17 Central Roofing Co. Anthony Spigarelli Central RAOfing 3315 Second Street North Dlinneapolis, MN 55412 MAII.ING LISP Norn�an Rnseth 4532 - 2nd Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 RuYh Evanc The CF�O Corporation 4528 - 2nd Street N.E. 7157 [�st Conmerce Circle N.EFridley, AtN 55421 Fridley, MN 55432 Theodore Wil]m-�n 4603 Main Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Audrey Sepple 4615 Main Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Fddy Wilson 4526 - 2nc1 Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Ivan Ficenko 4524 - 2nd Street N.E. Fridley, h�I 55421 Daoud G. House K. N. Hayat 4533 Atain Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Rcabert 0' Donnell 4543 N,ain Street N.E. Fridley, NIN 55421 Joseph Paaers 140 - 46th Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Charles Lindskoog 4548 - 2nd Street N.E. Fridley, AIIV 55421 F�ger Frankie 4544 - 2nd Street N,E. Fridley, MN 55421 Greg Miller 4540 - 2nd Street N.E, Fridley, Mf7 55421 Michael Zachar 4573 Main Street N.E. Fridley, NIN 55421 Resident 4571 Main Street N.E. Fridley, P'IN 55421 Leonard Olson 4567 - 2nd Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Leonard Olson 4591 Main Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Frank Kozlak 4512 - 2nd Street N.E, Fridley, MN 55421 Lee Johnson 111 - 45th Avenue N.E. Fridley, DII4 55421 Alexander Langiewicz 101 - 45th Avenue N.E. Fridley, NaI 55421 RoUert Keisling 4513 Nlain Street N.E. PYidley, I�9fI 55421 Ronald Str�erg 4523 DSain Stseet r1.E. fYidley, MN 55421 Bruce Herrick 4551 Main Street N.E. FYidley, MN 55421 SP #8�-]7 P1anrLing Ce�t��Roofing ].B Council Safetran Conq�any 9650 Main Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Honeymeade Pralucts 25 - 44th Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, MN 55421 c n o�_t� /.cnn u,.r_ c«_,._. V �� _—�_— _ l � O . ____�M W Z J � � —76/'- �d SP # 87-1.7 ir.��co��.�..�. 0 ♦ O 1 — � i «-es ,;y .,. >,.�-% --- � - LOCATION MAP 1C �I S.P. 87-17 +�� \ :- �., �� :� �. , , i''� ' �, � , � ; � ",,..�: � -� :. ��, F, �� ` � � `� � � S '� `� � � �` � � �,'� ,� � . > ``' ,�,�,.� `i ,3 Ey � �`"� f;;,31 ��r .,.� �> .i •'.y � � �..3 . � � :'' i_.' , i . � ;j ;:,� ; ' ✓ , � c.� y--,�� — +� � v �- ° ;,3 t,�- , Q u�l%�l� '� £ � ^ � �` 1 �„� ` �:� s � .; '� ��' � � � �1'�� ' - 4500 Main Street % %i SP #87-17 Central Rnofing �i• '�� . �ar�,� �n � �. .� � �� • ,� �� /L'' � E�'�� -- -� �= o� a_� � �;._ = a °� o0 �, . . , ��si � �� _ � >- _� -� �l � � _ � _ � — � � 4- j � �--r � � ZONING MAP 1D i ��ki , +� :t � i�� i � �.� � i � . ��. Y. Y+ � '� � �.. � 3: w �' � �tY� -�r � ' ' r s �. � . � . � � � � . ` � � >. � � l-+ � 1 �.-: sP #s�—i� lE S.P. 87-17 4500 Main Street Central 1�ofing • � � ,,,. �+,,q r� , �_�,• , ��° ' � 1,' ` �"" '- '` � ,, i •.� ,_� ''�y, � R �� ' > � �+ ' r' r ,+3 �1 w•�v':^e�i � 1�. ". � . � �r��`�4�� .�. � •i��/ �� !� J L ...�c� — �p' ""' E� _ - ' . "'.�, >~r�i � i � -� � �' Y� t' ,1 ,F`:i ! �"i i � . �� } �' � y �� f ld• • i xA,t1 �.. .�. 1' � � �� = , - ,c-: �,� . -�.. ' . � . , _ . ., _ -� . '� ! . !�� •- ,. h-� vF � �.:�•} - . —� -_ - " r �. NRs _. � _;. , r, �, :� , , r. � .. a , , ., .. `;�� r„. �rs r�' s.� �-n ' --- ..� � r . � f�'#. / ' , C� ^11�-,�.�l,��y��Y;jll-vt �,�c�~ � /,;!�l,ry�' � ��,�'}�j'�� !� 1= �` � >>J�Yi6 i'' �a *°�1�1it'�,�1p� _ _ 4 ` 'a� . � � ., ..y�+!'�� q �r .� � - � ;, � . 3' , , f '�a• I��/l' /• _ 1; .j� .�W".,.. � � �� A� ~ I .11��'� `..�� •: �� , � .�.. � � �� -^ � . � � �W ��rf% t � `� 1 � • � � (� �7 F "c � �t.�...�._ y S___ L .� �' �'� 9s � '. • �. �n.0 � _ ,,# t��• � _ � �� a. �� :�3 J � l i.. ' Fv r• J ' j .. ` L � ,j�� F ^�{ N� � — . �i', �,111,`. x � `T -� - . :�' � , ,�, ., ; � � , �, V �Y'J. , , , . � 1 � / Z ^1., , � � , • t��'dll�e�� y 1 � , ' � � -; -��:,,,� '', � � ' i�' � ' �'.., �S � i �i�C *� � 1 tE'-.t �� =�! � � ��l i � . '; � �� ♦ ,�,� " �, � _� y'� ;.� > , , , �.b , ' . - --�-,•�r::.� „ ___� s t� • _ _ -�r : F #�: . � ,. _: , . , .- � iii, 1 �i i '#� �.:4. •~ � 4 Y . �I' �' .• :� _ -� y - � ,,"`� :, ;_ °'='� , ; � � a�;; �. � ��1� ��- '�p7 4 � �' 1 7*��"�4:.�'�� j �, ,, r e�� ' �� : . � � .� � � � �"I '�'� � ;:�_ �; �` , '�: r�< Y "-- � .' r �� ., ^,'� "'� � 1 • �' �/ . f . � r, �a '�l� �. i � ` ��j '..',�`� ., * r i�A • '' �l �-��..1'rj AERIAL MAP �.�wc-.�+� i'AV.n w•,M•••MYr4nr.i.w.114 JG tt0/� 7 11 � ' l�.w /.e w �.. M[. A,� G � �ss, .. •'36"as"b�, Roofing u� i, S 6i [ur . '. . � —_ o .�. 1� t c:�'�-.�s:.;�.� P99.07 � .. _.. ...� -' T'y r� {..rd ��.. K Nr�,<t R� 1�� ( � i 4=T ' 1 ... ' � „ ' .� � � j~�i� .Fr«�- '_�� CT«, b 11lS -� �', � V'J M ` i'}Wfi � � �. ` � _ i 1+ _y..-��.��¢i.r,�,.�A..+E��" EI '+✓oi � '.wsntt i I� � ai ,t,,.�. ,.�.�. I j � � - I � ------- o � �� I I ` I ' ° `" i �F sn -----'-- . �, g 8 �w .'t �" S 1" Slo. Meld l'� " I y1_��1 v.,�' " r swa . '� 0„� lu � � •' `' i - ,� _-�--- s �� n � a s� I I _ � �.b.�� ... I F I. s' o } ' m ; •,_ ° ' -- ------' � � r _ _.' _ _ _- oV r J _ _. _ __— __ -3. �j - ' _. _ .__ "' -S i __"_' ' � ___'__i �j II , i ' i � �' I�I E r � , � � � k I �F ' G � '� � � I ° � , I ~?b � ' T: F I � � i I� _ _ � � i. I , C I V^ V P� � � I. i � N i � ' � � � � � � � �—� � ! � � 1 1 ' i N� i i i Y N • Q�£ '______ ____ __"___ � N 2 .�N +I �I __iE [�a ...'�T ______ __T�L.. __ __ - i..,u.a.o.a. sa�.ueeeo m � _ . � s � 0 ao c.�� tm..5r. . r..r w..ms � ��e I �5 En+ws Cur�J . 5 ww 1y[ af Ne 0 I —_ _ }�. iI.` �#—�.� �° rfs- Tp f •I`, �.� ' I o' �",J K_ � .�_.�_. _' — � 4. Se..� 5�., � lh.�e. fi�.�...i ,sP� Ld��..e N39939_a __ 3ao.00 10U�4 � '.. 62�1-- 'C ��':�'. ° 1 .. � ..- t,.. .w.r.�': .i. +� /4 tii; " 1 — _' _ . � 1,... Ere'L.,,. .f l.t 1 �STRE ET �, "" ---- 611.5b --- � . +��--�__ 4 sP #s�-i� 1G Central Roofing CENTRA[, ROOFING COMPANY VEHICLE LIST LIGtSI' TRUCKS 4 PICK-UP TRUCKS ^ti�DI[JM TRUCKS 1 STAKF. TRUCK 1 PATCH TRUCK 1 PANEL TRUCK 1 DUMP TRUCK 5 TANKER TRUCKS t{F.AVY TRUCKS 3 BOOM TRUCKS 1 TRACTOR T?2i,ILERS 20 VAF2IOUS TRJ�7LI:RS s� t' _ CITY OF FRIDLEY sp #s�-i� 1H Central Roofinq CI�'ICCti\Tk:l� • t�31 l'\I\'E:RSITl' AVE. N.E. FRIDLEI'. h91NNf:SOTA i9432 • PHONf[ 161'_� 571-3�S�i Septeril�e7 8, 1987 Central Roofing Comg3ny }lnthoiry Spigazelli 3315 - 2nd St. North Mpls., t-N 55412 Dear Mr. Spic�relli: Based upon the favorable results of the Odor Test as performed on August 19, 1987, staff is proceeding to Frocess youz special �se permit application. 2he ckte which has been set for a public h�cing at the Planning Commission meeting is Septenber 16, 1987. In order to properly process this application, a few additional items of informatim and check for 5200 to �ver the processing fee will be reoessary. As you will recall your previous check was returned to you pending the outcome of the environmental issues. At this time I am requesting the follwing responses to the F1�W be clarified and resutmitted fot au ieaiau on or before Septenbez 14, 1987: Sten #14, 7mperviazs Surfaoe As g3rt of the site imprwenent process it will be reoessary to pzwide hard surface �srking far enpla�ees and visitors. 7he tumbec af �rking stalls is ba�d on the s3uare footage � the building and its usage. I am enclosing a mp� of the oode which fuither describes the required pazking zatios. You should alsu take irrto a000�t yau plans for construction of a new office 6uilding and the parking Whi� would be reoessary for this aonstruction. It� #2?A, Slufaoe and Storm+rater With the construction of the hazd surface parking lot and future office building, it will be reoessary to desic� and impienent a stocm water r�m-off plan. �e zequirenents foz the watezshed district are that the run-off of storm water riot exceed a predevelopnent rate. Water quality should also be mairitaired throuc� the use of weics and skin¢ners. It is sufficient to note on the F.FW that this glan will be oomgleted prior to any wnstruction. it� #24. Hazazdoas Waste Describe the process and location af cleaning the tanks and other tar rPlated er�uipn�t. Also describe any permits which aze required throuc� the MPCA or the ooimty f� h3zarcbus waste handling and/or gereration. Please specif ic as to the prooess far disposing of all cleaning solva�ts. Centcal Roofing Cang-any Antho� spic$relli Sept�nbet 8, 1987 sP #e�-�� lI Central Roofinq In addition to the modifications to the El�Ni, we als� request that you supply a site glan indicating the location and size of the proposed office tuilding, and also the location of the necessacy hard surface �arking ar�. it will be �cessary to post a pecformance bond oc lettec of czedit to cover the imprwenents to the site, including landscaping, autanatic lawn sprinkling, and hazd surface pazking. Zhe anasst o�f this bond will be detecmined upon suYmittal of the site imprwenent plan. Your neighbor to the south, Rubber Research, is also in the process of desic�ing a lanclscape treatment for the fcont of their property. It would be appropriate to 000rdirr3te both landscape plans in order to provide a more unified landscape theme. As these plans become available we will be 000rdir�ting Yhe selection of the glant species with you. Pla3se be advi�d that the responses to the EpHT will be incor�rated ir�to the Planning Comnissiai agenda, and will renain on file as findings of fact and oonclusions. You may anticiFate 13�at there will be stipulations related to the operation which will icx�lude that odoc, roise, or c3.ist �.vllution created by the roofing operation not exceed levels described in the EAW, you sukmitted. �ank you for your �operation. We look forward to the responses to these inquiries and to your appearance at the public hearing on Septenber 16, 1987, at 7: 30 p, m. Sincerely 4.w1..G�o. James Robinson Planning Coordinator JLW lim C-87-416 1J - � anro� FRIDLEY bEhD 1�: COMN►UNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Nasim Qureshi, City Manac,�-1� PEND FROM: Jock Robertson, Cormum'.ty Developnent Director NEM� II4TE: AUgust 20, 1987 Rf�ARDING: Central Roofing Odor Test On Wednesday, August 19, 1987 at 3:30 p.m. the odor test designed by 74rin City Testing was repeated b� the folla.�ing g3ne1 menbers: Coimcilmenber, Nancy Jorgenson Planning Conanission Chainnan, Steve Billings Code Enforc�nent/Planner, Lisa Campbell President of Central Roofing Co., Anthony Spigarelli R�ltor, Janes Benson Director of Coirnn�mity Develognent, Jock Robertson The results of this field test were essentially the same as the a�rlier field test conducted by �in City Testing on April 27 and April 28. A southwesterly breeze was blaaing at about 10 m.p.h. �e �xinel was positioned at 50 foot intervals on the front lawn of hanes on Main Street directly across the street from the CECO property. �ey were able to detect the asphalt odor fran the two trucks that were heated to a temperature slightly over 300 degrees. The odor lasted between 5-10 seconds and was of the irrtensity similar to the aior frctn a diesel truck or bus. After the trucks were �rked on the western edqe of the property, the panel then walked to,vard then and was not able to detect the odor from the txucks until they were within 50 feet. Based on these results together with the reviEw of the oangleted EAW and the descziptiai of the proposed activity, the City Council should be advised to decide whether to oontinue the 30 day environmental review process through the State Legister and sewndly to set a date for a public hearing. At the ha3ring the Council would revicw the permit applications and set stiFulations for the permit based on the findings of the F�+5�7, ti�e field odor testing and Central Roofing's description of the pro�sed activity. _ � M-87-175 sP #s�—i� 1K Central Roofing .AUgust 6, 1987 Resident Re: Ceco Property 4500 Main Street As you may already be aware, your neighbor on Main Street, the Ceco Corporation, is in the pcocess of moving from their ten acre industrir.l site to a new location in Ham Lake, Minnesota. The (,cCi% �.VCLOCuLiUli i:d:- S:JrL C[1r, j��i1C�� ..i.�..� u'..1'1:., _„'J liLLf. �UlIIE.'J�i�'r Central_ Roofing Company, has entered into a purchase agreement with the Ceco Corporation to purchase the north five acres for our new corpo:ate headquarters. We intend to build a small office building on the site in the near future and will use the balance of the property for storage of our general materials and equipment. We tiave submitted an application to the City of Fridley to use the property and as part of that application we have agreed to land- scape the grass boulevard area in front of the existing screening wall and to install an underground lawn sprinkling system. This will certainly enhance the existing lawn area and entry way to the property. Our new neighbor to the south has also agreed to land- scape their front boulevard area. Pact of our business requires that at the end of each work day we park one to three small roofing trucks on our site which will have a limited amount of roofing asphalt left in the trucks. These trucks will be parked over night on the very westerly (rear) portion of the site. In an ;_`�c:t to help t.:a �?ry e•-al�at� a��y p�ssih?e o�or whi�h may 5e er�itted from these trucks, we conducted an independent test on April 27, and 28, 1987. The test was designed and monitored by Twin City Testing Company, of Minneapolis, Minnesota. On thess dates we brought two of our trucks down Main Street and drove onto the site and parked the trucks in the rear of the site. Both trucks were totally filled with asphalt and were at their highest operatino temperature. This was an extreme situation which would never occur in that any truck which comes back to our property is never full and is in a cooling stage. On each test day, Twin City Testing positioned" three people on the front lawns of the homes along Main Street directly across the street from the Ceco property. These people monitored any detection of odor as the trucks passed on Main Street and turned onto the site. The � sp #s�-i� 1L Central Rr�ofing results of the test, which were presented to the City of Fridley, indicated that if and when an odor was detected by the panel members that the odor lasted no more than two to four seconds and only as the truck passed along Main Street. Once the truck was on the property there was no detection of odor. �� Because our application to the City of Fridley to use the property � requires a public hearing, the City felt that the test should be repeated so that any City Council Member who wished to be present, Lisa Campell, City of Fridley Code Enforcement Planner, and any resident adjoining the property could have an opportunity to judge for themselves that the tr�cks do not present any odor problem. Therefore, we invite you to be present on August 19, at 3:30 P.M. wl�en our comr:�r�� •�il� sg.�ir. Lrir� r;,r�P t-.:�-fis cinwn Mai.n StreeC and park them on the Ceco site. I want to assure you that our company is not a manufacturer of any type of asphalt products. We will use the property for our gen- eral offices, sheet metal shop and for the storage of general equipment and products such as roofing felt and roof insulation. I have enclosed a brochure describing our company which has been in business since 1929. Our quality work has been a part of numerous landmark buildings throughout the metropolitan area. In the Fridley area, we have played a major role in expansions for companies such as Lamaur, Medtronics, Target, Longview Fiber and Donaldson's Department Store. We are excited about locating our corporate headquarters in Fridley and feel that we wi11 be a quality and responsible neighbor. If you have any concerns or questions, please feel free to call me at my office. Very truly yours, CENTRAL ROOFING COMPANY Anthony M. Spigarelli President TS/jkb e Afay 4, 1987 Central Roofing Coa�pany ?315 Secon�' Stc'eet North !:inr,eaoclis, Ai±n^esota 55412 At�n c,ab j : � *;r. Antbeny Spi�areili; President Ouor Surve�, Fridley Si[e Q4231 87-ii0 Dear A;r. Spigarelli: SP #87-17 Central Roofing tw�n c�t�r testinq corporat�on 662 CROMWELL AVENUE ST. PAUL, �MN 55114 PHONE 67216a5-3601 T•.�!n City Testing Corporation (TCT) conducted a subjec2ive odor survey at the site in Fridley, Minnesota to which Central Roofing'Company (CP.C) is proposing to locate i[s present operations (offices and vehicle parking and dispatch). Tnis sun•ey was conducted as per our proposal dated Apri1 24, 1yc'. n more detailed report including methodologies and results is being provided under eeparate cover. In brief, the survey w•as conducted as follows. ° Ti:e su:v>y �:as conducted on Nonday, Tuesday �nd kednesdzy (April 27-29, 1987) during the period of approximately 1:45 - 3:15 p.m. °!'RC activicv on the site (on N,onday znd Tuesday) ccns:s*_ed of twc heated tar.k trucks p�rked at tne rear (r:crthMes[ portion) of the site, and or:e heated [ank [ruci: being driven ou: of and r=turr.ine '-o the sice. rn�s represen[s [he t�pical acti�aitti during the afternoon period, according :c CP.C: however, th= [ank trucks contained nore asphalt and w_re heated to a t=mpera[ure higner�than would be the case during the return of the trucks tv the site under regular operations, according to CRC. > TCT personnel w_re positioned along the resi- dsntial ieast7 side of Main Street as the tani: t:uck made four passes and for a one-hour p=rie� th_reaf*_e:, aich the tank trucks re- rainir.g at the :ear of the site. M WWL OPPOHTUNITV EMGIU'ER ir� � - sP #s�—i� 1'! Central Roofing Cent:al Roofing Company hfay 4, 1987 Page Two p4231 87-710 = Subjective odor recordings were noted by TCT personnel a[ one minute intervals. In addition, observations of background odors and odors not related to CRC activity were no[ed. ° On lvednesday, there was no CRC activity. Three cold tank trucks were parked at the rear of the site. TCT personnel were stationed as per above and con- ducted a one-hour odor observation program. This was done to determine other odor sources potentially affecting the adjacent residential area. The above survey is subjec[ive and no quantification was possible, due [o time limitations and other complicating factors. However,` the suzvey is similar to odor panel methodologies uCilized by the Piinneso[a Pollution Control Agency (AfPCA). The use of personal odor detecti.on does effectiyely represent how adjacent residents wouid perceive odor problems associated with the proposed CRC activity. , Durirg the three-day survey, the only asphaltic odors noted by TCT personnel positioned along Main Street were associated with the tank truck passing by the personnel. The odors were moderate but only transient (perhaps 2[0 3 seconds). With the :ank [rucks parked on site, no noticeable asphaltic odors were noted by the personnel positioned along Main Stree[. In addition to the survey for odors along Main Stree[, TCT personnel made general odor observations relative to the Rub6er Research Elastomers, Inc. and other ind�strial activities adjacent to ihe site. Some sulphitic, grain or food processing, and solvent odors were noted and these were also noted periodically by the personnel as Chey conducted the survey along Main Street. The sulphitic odors appeared to originate from Rubber Research Elascomers, Inc. and were observed by TCT personnel to be more noticeable and irritatir.g than the asphalt odors, when observed. In general, climatic condi[ions during the survey were clear, warm and windy, wich winds ranging upward to 20 to 30 mph and qui[e va�iable in direction. These conditions are fairly typical of summer conditions• Higher temperatures and humidi[ies associated vith summer periods should not significantly affect odor emissions from the site. C=ntral Rocfing Cor.:pany P!zy G, 1487 . ?zge Tnree �G231 87-710 sp # s�-i� 10 Central Roofing �� TCT personnel also qualitatively assessed the degree and extent of odor emissions dow�nwind from the parked heated tank trucks. With strong winds, the odor was detected consistently no more than approximately 50 meters downwind. When the trucks were unheated, only faint odors were detected and only within a few feet of Ghe trucks. Based on the above cesults, TCT's professional opinion is that those odor emissions (from CRC activities) likely to generate residential complaiots are only those associated uith the passage of heated tank trucks onto or out ef the site. These emissions vould be transient and infrequent. It should be noted that [he tank trucks used during the survey contained more asphalt and were hotter than would be typical, according to CRC. Therefore, the trucks would be expected to have generated a higher level of emissions than would be the case during regular operations. This opinion in no way implies or indicates any guaran[ee or warranty relative to future odor complaints from the residents or other businesses in the area or to [he outcome of any regulatory decisions. The cesulta are only applicable to the conditions, dates and times of the testing programs. Other odor sources are present in [he area and are likely to impact the residential area. In addition, unique meteorologic condicions highly different from those during the survey may affect odor impact on the residential area. Should you have any contact me. A more separate cover. Very truly yours, questions or require additional information, please detailed reporc of results and methods will follow under Twin City Testing Corporation !�_� l..' JVV"' - Reith C. Govzo, M.S. Project Manager �ji��2� "" ( / Charles A. Job, Manager Environmental Department KCG/CAJJsjo E.A.' {filled in Cy EQB) sP �8�-l� 5�Z�64 1P Central Roofing Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) MARK APPROPRIATE BOX: � REGULAR EAW (Discretionary} ❑ SCOPING EAW N07E T'U REVIEWEBS: For regulac EAWs, written commems should address the accuracy and tompleteness of the EAW information, potencial impacts that may.warrant investigation andJor the need for an EIS. Eor scoping EAWs, wrinen com- ments should address �he accuracy and completeness of the information and suggest issues for investigation in the EIS. Such comments must be submitted to ihe Responsible Govemment Unit (ftGU} during the 30-day pe�iod foUowin9 notice o( the EAW's availab3lity in �he EQB Dfonitoc Contact the EQB finetro: 612/296-8253; non-metro: 1-800-652-9747, ask (or envi- ronmentai review program) or the RGU to find out when the 30-day comment period ends. 1. Projecc Mame 4500 M3in Street NE E.. Proposer A. St,iya�al l.i .�L. HCiU Ci'. ; �f Fridle}� 4. Contact Person Address 3315 Second Street North Minneax�olis MN SS412 Phone 588-0745 Co��acc Person .7im Robinson and Tide Plannin4 Coordinator Address 6931 UniversitY Ave NE tYidley N1N 55432 Phone ' S71-3450 Projea Lotation; SE �/a SE �/a Section 27 Township 30 N Ran e 24 W 9 a. Counry Name AnOk7 City/Towrtship Name FY1d1BV 6. Atiach copies o! each of the following to the EAW: 1. a county map showing the general area of the project. 2. a copy(ies) of USGS 7� {s mioute. l:24.000 scale map. 3. a site plan shnwing ihe location of sigaificam features such as pcoposed structures, roads, exrenc o!(Iood plain, wedands, we11s, ett. 4. an existing land use map and a zoning map otthe immediate area, if available. 5. Descri6e the proposed projecl completely (attach additional sheets as neceesary�. The offices, warehousing and outside storage of Central Roofing Cor�any iCn�', �..ouic; �s� nntiac.i c� ti�t site. ,�t p�ese�;t aite i� wc:u for �ig?:t manufacturing and outside storage of building materials and vehicles. CRC would fabricate sheet metal accessories in existing building. {Assembly for use in field.) At scxnetime in the future CRC would apply for a permit to build a new office. � SP #87-17 �. Aeason for Ft1W preparation: �Q�iT'@d bY Jltn ROb1nSOf1 C'F'ni-ral Pmfi ng Lis1 all mandatory calegory rule "s which apply: DiSCi2tlOfldl'V 7. Estima[ed construction cost NOne 8. Tatal project area lacres) 5.05 orlength �miles) 9. Number o! residential units none or commercial, industrial, or instiwtiona! square (ootage 1 0• Number of proposed parking spaces 15 2 1. List uli known local, state and lederal pe�mits/approvals/funding required: Level of Government Federal: State: Typeo(Application Status None �f�.SiLa Loc�t: FYidley Special ��s� �e :�ut re:�uised i� � �u�sidc :;rora3e. 1 2. Is Ihe proposed pruject inconsistent with the local adop�ed comprehensive land use plan or any o�her adopted plans? � No ❑ Yes I(yes, explain: 1 3. Describe current and recent past land use and development on and near the site. � Heavy Industrial. This site is used for manufacturing and storage. Adjoining paracels are similary used. Large railroad yard to west. 150 foot setback from Main Street on east. 1 4. Approximaiely how many acres o( the site are in each of the fallowing categories? (Acreages should add up to wtal praject area before and aher construction.) Before Foresti Wuoded �_ Crop�and �— Brushrgrns�laud �— Aker Before Aher —�� We�land Itypes 3-81 —� —� �_ Impervious Surface _�_ _Q— �_ i�i/ile: (speei �,� S _ n= °, (: S 15. Describe �he soils on the si�e, yiving lhe SCS soil dassification types, if known. class v 1 V. Does the site contain peat suils, highly erodible soils, steep slopes, sinkholes. shallow limestone formations, abandoned wells. or any geologic hazards? If yes, show on site map and ezplain: i;l'b?Jl ZG��1P.y' � No G Ves 1� 1 7. What is the approzimate depth (in (eet) to: � , a. groundWater `!� min. 4�avg. b. bedrock min. _avg. Source is Anoka County - Joel #757-4224 1(} SP #87-17 ,C). Does any part of the project area invofve: It�Tdl�J�p�lllcj a. shorelandzoningdistrid? o j�-� �es �. delineated 100-year flood plain? ' � No �..{ Yes c. state or iederally designated river land use district. No L� Yes If yes, identify water body and applicabie state classification(s), and describe measures to protett water and related land resources: 1 7. Describe any physical altera�ion (e.g., dikes, excavation, fill, stream diversion) of any drainage syscem, lake, s�ream, andjor wetland. Describe measures to minimi:e im- pairment o! the water-related resources. Estima�e quantity of maierial to be dredged and indica�e where spoils u�ill be deposited. G�. a.14'iil the projecl require an appropriation of ground or surface water? If yes. explain (�ndica�e yuamity and source�: b.Will Ihe project aHen groundwater levels in any wells (on or oHthe site)? If yes, ex- plain: 2�. Describe the erosion and sedimentation control measures to be used during and a6er construction o(the project. None � No ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes None 22. a. Will ihe project generate: 1. surface and stormwa[er runoH? ' X No � Yes 2. sanitarywastewa�er? No � Yes 3. industrial wastewater? No � Yes 4. cooling wa[er (contact and noncontatt). No Ves 1( yes, identify sources. volumes, qualiry (if other than normal domestic sewage), � and treatment methods. Give the basis or methodolo9y of eslimates. b. Id�ntif�� reteiirinq wa�>rs. indudino aroundwaarr. and evaluate �he �mparts cd thv discharges lisred above. If discharges �o groundwater are an�icipated, provide per cola�ion �permeabiliN and other hydrogeological test da�a, iiavailable. 2J. Will ihe project generate leither during or aher constructionl: a. air pollution? b, dusc? c. noise? d. odors? I(yes, exptain, induding as appmpriate: distances �o sensifive land uses: expected lev- els and duration of noise; types and Quantitie.s of air pollutan[s from stacks. mobile sources, and fugitive emissions Idust); odor sources: and mitigative measures for any impacts. Give the basis or methodology of estimaies. NOr': No n Yes � No r� �'es No Yes _No Yes Test conducted of mobile sources indicates no measurable odor units. 1� 3 I SP #87-17 ��. Describe thc rype aad amount of solid and/or'azardous waste including sludges and CBri�� ROOPI7KJ ashes tha� will be generated and the method �d loca�ion o( disposal: 25. WilllheprojectaHecr. � No ❑ Ves a. fish or wildlife habitat, or movement of animals? b, any native species that a�e oHicially listed as state endangeced, threalened, or of a Na � Yes special concern (animals and/or D�antsl? It yes, explain lidentify species and describe impact�: 2V. Doanyhistorical,archaeotogicaiorar hitectwalresourcesexistonorneartheproject site? If yes, explain �show resources o a site map and describe irt�patt): 2 7. Will the projea tause the �mpairment or descruction oC a. designated park m recreation areas? b. prime or unique farmlands? �, «coingically sensitive arv>�? d. scenic views and vistas? e. other unique resources (speciiyl� II yes, explain: 20. For each aflected road indicate the turrent average daily traffic (ADT), increase in ADT contributed by the project and the directional distributions ef trakc. IX.1 No ❑ Yes � Na ve5 � No Yes ''�( No Yes ULJ n[ ' tle• No Yes Current traffic count is 4500 per day on Main Street per NIIV DDT - Dupley Gjersvig #296-1664. Central Roofing Cor�any's average daily count is 25 (in and out). This is 0.5� of current ADT on Main Street. 27. Are adequate utilities and public services now available io service the project? «^o�• ❑ No � Yes what additional utilities and/or services will be required? Summary of Issues � For regular EAWs. list �he issues as identified by °yes" answers above. Discuss alternatives and mitigalive measures for these issues. For scoping EAWs. list knowo issues, ahematives, and mi�iga�ive measures to be addressed in EIS. @29 - All utilities needed are in. #24 - As discussed in meeting with Jock Robez,`�on and Virgil Herrick, rooiing asphalt is the san� prcxiucc as ioud aspha'_t Sut has � somewhat lower softening point. It is not a carcinogen and poses no threat to grounc3water. Nbst roofs in the USA drain directly to the ground. Roofing shingles utilize the same product that we use• CERTIF1CATtON BY RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENTAL UNIT I hereby cetti(y that the informa[ion contained in this dotument is lrue and complete to [he best oi my knowledge and tha� copies ol the completed EAW have been made available �o all poin[s on the oHicial EQB distribution list. Signamre T11�! Dace 1� 0 'r; � �� CiTY OF FRIDLEY MEFfl �: PLANNING DIVIStON MEMORA.NDUM Owners and Developers of Office Warehouse Develognents, City Council and Etidley Q�amber of Catenerce MEM� fRpM: Steve Billings, Planning Conunissiai Qzaiiman NEt�D IIY++TE: August 27, 1987 g�pRpING; Puhlic Ha3ring to Discuss Office/Warehouse 4hhnant Structure 'lt�e Fridlelr Planning Commission has �eoently completed a cough draft of an Ozdir�nce cecodifyin9 th� Fcidlep Zoning Code by amending the industrial sections of the Code co allaw for a limited amount of co�mnercial-type busiresses in office/aarehouse mixed use buildings. �e Ordinance which has been inder study for hao months, is scheduled for review by official public h�ring on September 16, 1987. �is meeting will be held by the Planning Comnission in the City of Fridle� Civic Center Co�mcil Chambers at 7:30 p.m. All interested persons are invited to attend. As pec the Planning Caiunission's r�uest, this menoran�.vn and a coplr of the proposeo Ozdir►3nce is bein9 sent to all the owrersldevelopers of e�cisting and proposed officelwardiouse develognents within the City limits. In addition, the Fridley Chacnber of Cammeroe and the Fridley City Council is also being notified. We hope that you will be able to re�iew the Ordirtinoe and atterd the meeting on Septesnbec 16, 1987. We look focwazd to your comments and concerns. In the meantime, if you have questia�s gl�se feel fcee to call Jim Robinson, FYidley's Planning Coordi�tor, at 571-3450. 7hank you foa your consic3eration of this matter. Your oarmients will help us to develop the most ap�xopriate tusiress climate for the City o� Fridle�. m Ih-87-177 zc Ordir►�nce No. _ Page 3 b� .r. i�. � �. .n • • � - u • � • � � =.t • � - .�.. - • . • � . � . i < •: •: ni =.• .��. .• �u-i � • �• �• - � • � ..iu..�-� � . •._�. •-�- �,�. . �...,. - -� -�. o . • •-. �. M�- . . �• .0 .� �,. � - �- . n r n n • • � •. . � �� .� . - • M�- n., a m . • �.� �_ . -• • � ,�• • �- •m�- •: �u a.•. . ..� r�n e�- �. -a. �•. . �� . . �., . .. � �. � �: • -i,� -:,. �. �1� .i . �• • •�- •� �- �_ 11 :�� • 11 11 • 11 • 11 � ' • • � • ' • 1 . • � • ' • " 11 ' • . 1 ' 1 • � • ' �' � • a�' '-- —''— � •� • Y�- . ••.• :.. - � �- .. � .� . i- • r .• . .- •;m.. • .� �- � .� .� . •.• �• . .- •.. �. .i. � .� �. •� �: �� •- -• •� ,� �• • -�.� .- •. !Ull: •� • a.y • 1' �� •1 • 1'• � � .�• ( q '� • �.� 1- •' •1 •' "• • 1 . � � • • • ' •. 2(15.03. .,nn- ;� •� . . . � - - � � - - � . . 1i1. • • 1. .�• ��.. 1• • �• 1 • 1 • ��. . �- •.. • • ' aJ • .1' i'1' �. • • " Ozdinanoe No. _ Page 4 :- , -� .� - .� .. .�. .- .� �. .� - � .. •� - -• .- ,� .� ,� .� � �. . n. - . i- -� •n �- • -n . .�� n�. .� - ,� � .- •� .•..n ,� � •� !� • 7!� • � • �� • �1� : M �• M • M � • � �' WILLIAM J. NEE - tRiYUR ATPFST: 33IRI,EY A. E3AAPALA - CITY Q,FRK Public Hearing: First Reading: Semnd Reading: Publication: � 2D � � CITY OF fRIDLEY + 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. � FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612)5Tt-3450 LOT SP41T FORM L.S. #�j'%- D g IAT SPLTT EEE��DO PARK FEE��5�6 RE.'CEIPP #�� 9QiIDULID PLANNTNG Q)TIItISSION MEET]NG IY�TE: ��6/�, ! � SQIFLULID CITY QJUNCII, t�ETTTAIGIG IY,TE: PROPERTY INFORMATION �w�ess: G',qy- L�AL DESQtIPPIQN: o./�►/ �ir �Y ll L(7T BIACY. 'IItACf/ADDITIl7N 1PRFSFNf ZCfIING � � REPSOt� FDR IAT SPLIT: A sketch c� the property and the proposed lot sglit witi� arr� existing structures sharn should acoanpa� this agglication. 3 * • * * * * # x • * � * * • * x * t s tt x x r * x a x x x x x x a� x : +� . . .• . •• _ FEE OINNER INFORMATION r�r� � � �arrE �� -7 � - a -� �/ R �w�aFSS .�n � � o �n �.� _ � ��v � N S S `� � � sicxr�v� 1.0 .�e..�.a.+-� e , � n�� No[e to Coniract Purchasets; Fee Owners m �� i�n*f* *�r*o* **p*o*e�ss�n�.* *** it i*• f f 4 R f� rF !� f!�k f• f!� �k f�t PET{TIONER INFORMATfON NAPE •��•� RICt7E � SIGNAISTRE I1ATE f t*,t**�,t*t***:*s�� ****:*,t:� **,t**:*•�****,c* � rr.nNta�c aoru�assiox : r�azwm c�gn n�,� ctx� aootuca, : S`PIATLATIONS: .�k•.��. �� i�. .� �.s. #s�-os 3�, ��,�., William Henley _ G7YOF ERIDLEY CIVIC CENTER • 6J31 UNNERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 • PHONE{6i2) 571-3450 September 2, 1987 ZU WFiOM TT DY�Y �NCF'.RN: The City of FridlEy Planning Conenission will be holding an informal hearing on a request for a Lot Sglit, L.S. �87-08, by Willian Henle�, to split parts of Lot 11, 12, 18 and 19, Block 2, Nbore Lake Highlands, all generally located at 6300 &iker Street N.E. 7he legal descriptions are as fnllows: PAR(�L A. Lot 11, Block 2, except the South 90 feet and Lot 19, Block 2, excepC the South 90 feet of the West 140 feet; all in Moore Lake Highlands. PARCEL B. I,ot 11, Block 2, except the North 60 feet; the North 40 feet of Lot 12, Block 2; the North 115 feet of Lot 18, Block 2, except the South SO feet af the North 115 feet and except the West 130 feet of the North 35 feet; Lot 19, Block 2, except the North 90 feet of the West 140 feet, lying South of the North 60 feet and except the West 130 feet of that g3rt o� Lot 19 lying South of the North 90 feet thereof as measured along South and West lines thereof; all in Moore Lake Highlands. Anyone who wishes to be heard shall be given the opportimity at the Planning Comnission meeting on Wechesday, Sept. 16 , 1987 in the Council Chamber of City Hall at 6431 University Avenue N.E. at 7:30 p.m. SPEUE BILLII�S Q-IAIRt9ir1 PLAI�AIING OJPPIISSION L.S. k87-08 William Henley William Henley 63�0 Baker Street N.E. Fridley, NIN 55432 Donald Barrows 6225 Able Street N.E. Fridley, MMPii 55432 George Heilman 6261 Able Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Daniel Johnson 6271 Able Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Vernon Hyvare 6281 Able Street N.E. Fridley, Mt3 55432 John Foster 6285 Able Street N.E. Fridley, NIN 55432 Patricia Levoir 6278 Baker Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Ibuglas Blase 6264 Baker Street N.E. Fridley, NIN 55432 Timothy Eklund 6250 Baker Street N.E. Fridley, r�I 55432 Rose Jasper 6279 Baker Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Dale Beihoffer 6259 Baker Street N.E. Fridley, DIIJ 55432 Robert Guelker 6239 Baker Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Henry Tschida 6229 Baker Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 M71II�ING LIST Robert Hoppe 6362 Baker Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Francis Van Dan 6342 Baker Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Gerald Machoaicz 6314 Baker Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Leo Zuroski 6311 Able Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Joseph Stanek 6301 Able Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Nora�n Johns 6321 Able Street N.E. FYidley, MN 55432 Steven Yuric7c 6359 Baker Street N.E. Fridley, MDI 55432 Robert Bard 6347 Baker Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Michael Manuel 6315 Baker Street N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 John Q'Hara 6301 Baker Street N,E. Fridley, MN 55432 L.s. #a�-os 3B V7illiam Henley Plaruiing 9/2/87 Counci3 � � CITYOF FRIDLkY FEPD 'm: NEM� FROM: I�M� IY�TE: L.S. #87-08 PLANNING DIVISION S7illiam Henley MEMORANDUM Planning Comnission Jock Robertson, Conm�nity Developnent Directot Jim Robinson, Planning Coordir►�tar Septanber 11, 1987 12F�ARDII�: Willi�n Henley, L.S. #87-d8 On July 28, 1987 Mr. William Henley made application to the City for a subdivisiori of his Fxoperty located at 6300 &�ker Av�ue N.E. Mr. Henley's proposal is to split �f the mrtherly 60 feet � his lot in order to create a new building site which he would sell to a prospective buildez. Prior to the official application, I strongly recommended to Mt. Henley that he upgcade his lot split to create at le3st a 68 foot wide lot which would be closer to the Code requirenent of 75 feet. Mr. Henley rejected this suggestim stating that he reeded the additional setback frcm the north face of his garage in orc3er to pcwide vehiculaz acoess to his yard. After further staff reviEw and an orrsite inspection of the property, I sent Mr. Henle� the attaciied letter, c�ted August 11, 1987, strongly advising that he revise his subdivisim to prwide f� a 68 foot lot. i pointed out that the majority of the lots in the ar� have 90 foot frontages and the proposal for 60 feet would certainly not be consistent with the other lots on the block. Mr. Henle� did not tespond to our request. On September 10, 1987 I phoned the Henley's and spoke to Mrs. Henley regarding our reservations concerning the lot split. In addition to the width problen I related to her, addition3l conoerns raised by the Public Works Departrnent ooncerning drair�ge in the ara3. The proposed new lot is a large depressed area which is a natural storm drainage collection and percolation area. Public Works suggested that if a haLSe wese to be allowed to be constructed on this lot that it should be located as faz forward toaazd street grade as possible to leave sufficient are3 for peroolation. �e request is further oomglicated b� the fact that it is necessary to average setbacks aocording to Code. Based upon this averaging requirener�t the proposed house would need to be set back approximately 60 fcet. 4Wo neighbors have also expressed their disapprwal for the petition. Mcs. I+i�chowicz who resides just nortl� of the proposed sglit will be at-the meeting ta.voioe her opposition. "- Becaise � the prohlens associated with the lot split I offered to zeturn their aFplication fee if they would withdraw the application prior to the Planning Commission. Mrs. Henle� stated that they were intent upon prooeeding with the lot split and ti�at the� did not desire to d�ange the lot split request in any fashion. Based upon the negative aspects of this subdivisim staff reoaun� deniai. . �, � L.s. as�-os 3D William Henley Auqust ll, 1987 Willia¢n Henle� 6300 8aker Street N.E. Fridle�, NSl 55432 RE: Lot Sglit at 6300 Baker Street N.E. Dear Mr. Henley: Staff has reviewed yout lot split application and completed an on-site inspectiai of the property. At this time I must anphasize that your request is not oonsistent with City Codes. As I told you priot to your application the City Code requires 75 feet frontage for a build3hle lot. Although you have the �utential to spl it off 68 feet for the new lot, you have chosen to ask f ot a 60 foot frontage lot sgtit apprwal. Your stated reason was to allcw access into your rear yard on the mrth side of your hane. In as muc2� as there is no driveway to your rear yard and you do have roughly 60 feet of open yard on the south of your hane, I would strongly adviae that you zevise your subdivision request to prwide a 68 foot lot. It is possible to obtain a lot width variance along with a lot split approval, howev�, me important aspect of such apprwal is the wmpatibility with the surramding neic�orhood. Our revia� of the surramdin9 lats shoaed all large parcels witl� mainly 90 foot frontages. In closing, I am rot sure that ev� a 68 foot wide lot meet with Coimcil's apprwal but past experience shows would not. Pl�se remnsider your petitiai and advise m Sinoerely, Jeanes Robinson Planning Coordirntor � : . �� C-87-354 on this block would that a 60 foot lot e of your intem. i � ' ' ' "f �� Ytl� +Y,td. � .:ra.rtse�f.0 �� L.s. #s�-oa 3E i L9i 1 l i am Hanlav � : L7 � : - - . o � ,�W. __ m vHµ -- -: � I ro o ^ �9�' �� ; � itm� el � , lLi �=a� � ; � , zfz.ss zar. �" '' , Q 1 .4�i /� �'fPo) 9' 9�S 0.� . ] � _ A: + o as.: , - � _ � o (ow) C ": �� o � �� yYl . r pi • c — � � ° � u � I113--q. � r.'� �j (.rol /�� \ .` (�tel iiool � _ �. e a� �0 `+ Q �Iv/ �tl, � f+ is i� rso� ,�� pi (t `' TU' , Z N� /�� " l)I4y01 ° L`�) ()io� r + m � i � � �� '�., l�7� 4 ` 1 i�I� � /uz." p �� vzr � a �z � R tf 3 `�3 �,,;;o� �' r«� " � 64 TH VE. N. E. � Y r� ° • Z so �so � �,t� �� < s. ,o ,�..�: � � �i � o �,.,<� o �,sl 6t) «31 �µl �d� � o na�c�,��o R �c.;a) R . �7 � ; (se� B (rl fi \ t � G3 � `�� Q ' W (iraoJ /eD.��o e ��, • �o w l f"' so 0 0 0� � � le M �� "$ V � �' 1— o (�mQ: � o p)'6 o vo . z�• $ r" I� \ l� l"r%J w w I ` r � ' lioBVJ �y� ° • I � Jo ° /lo �°. �.�� O I � �=� �£.•D � V y $� a, �; ' y � /iofi) (4C) i �(ji� u° .,,v O �I ��) � 1 ; "� �o' pUTLOT/ : Q , [1 0 �f i „` B pr' � : ° 7f 7s Gow��IL% o � '. � y�62{, }� __:'P?O ��ca ' /f0 � � /SO H Sf�d � �ir�/wW ^ _ d �s s y f - � ; . p�,� A o �; � i (ia�o �) �" � � -L � ; �_ I /rl p O � / e "y_'_ i .'In�r �. 4 � �� q � � /nl � s ' /9/'f�cd�) � _ --� ` 7 ' /so � �;�..,.'{°.. . �.(�i.c.iu/�' . •. uo . qd'et%�j�� Z• l�G, e /i) a /7soJ � i,��1�Q , N i tee� : �G..�nv.N' 8 I jJ W:, 2�t�� °, F'. `._ z _ .n�. �:"p'�.�.,, � (�,� _. �� Z - ,. � X N i a�J & Y �) Q 2asc � ias.� ,�'r-, 1 �-1- ti-�:-. o . Q � p� v �t : � 'vao� o' , " m $�� w -� p S b (� ^ - i a L)�o 0.\ 5 �+ �1 G� \0 �� ,b�JC� . �� HL � f�i L� � � y� �, ly `96�"�� $ ,8�akj�o w 2ss.c � l�: �i h P ZOS/J' � � ioa ioo c / �2H0�� '+ //oc)� '�0 �� : � !9M1 � % 11�N _ ' ��i �� (�1J. S (BGP% �{� 9 • f • �ry � � � ti 6 - � i`� � a� �( 91J) / O ��f� �1 ) Q. V . ` � 1��'\ 3 l�� ioW) i O � ��/ � \,�. ��,:i 0'7�' r°.,I IPq /0036 66 � � �.��4% `�.3O�f� �� ' � WEST ' , �o.g �_ '2 ,. 90 ,sr.,r � �RE L�QkE . DRIVE � " �Qa � � I %�,� ,��,s , ,3� 2 �� . � " � � . K ' s i `��'J � �2e �SO � p,r,. � js�. , ..... � O , V � i iI I o N �` . •�l � � \ � � ',: . \ � �� ` i I � OUTLIQT / ' _r +,' � � oar[or `p , , 1 � � \ f/7�)� �r_�:;�1 ._ � �.' 1 f LOCATION MAF r L.s. #s�—os 3F William Henley : � � #• t ' � �' V � , .� �� ,�� — � v .. . � �� I . � f .� � .� :�,, � 7 � � �c �..+! . �� ' r, `y�s . �' �' ..' .�f� � .�,s � _ �� ti.� M� � ti . � �, ', ,a,., � ' �. � �; 'x� � � .A r�� ." ,# .� r�� : �' � i; � � :�,a � � ��' °.�^ P�� .�. : !� �-___` _ ._ . L.S. #87-OS wi].lzam xenley _ i: � � � T �� . � :$ � �. ;:�� t� ., a =, r ' t , � ; � 1d�« ,�. �` t '�` '. ;- .,a ^� , � �' r _ � -, t _,:.� 3. �� f - � #- :�^� � :- � , : � � .' .*.. •<s r .' � � �: �� `: ; ., �. . . t ;,.'.� —,r�� a . � � r;� ; � �� f � �' " � i . <r�4 ., . � . . ;,. ._.� N'� � J .- +�',�e7 • �-: v � . �.�, . i 1 � .� �: [ � � � . �,�: ..f : � � ;�. � , � , n„ ► ..,, � > � ��. , r �- - < �, � � t 1� Y ` ��'�' �''F � ` A , �, - � � , . ,�;. /. . � , �' y s ' �i CKiSi� 'iti , ��_ . k .' � '.• � \S�N�-' � , ' � .�� ,+ � � . i :�. �' ' �• ' `` �f• 'w�� L''- � i- .�c• � � .� � ` � r j�� ,5 �► � � . �'� �. �=' . � i f�' , • 1 .T �.� 1 ) / f ,' t, : "' c M ..�`" �,,�,�,.:� � ; , ry ��, �- . � ;. . � � ° ;�` . ,; � ,�„ . - . s t � .� ��. ` , !i.� '•�� ' .�, a�'' ` � ! � _�/ � .�� .� �.� , ;.��Mw ! �"�fi,� 1•' '�� j� .° n * � � � I �r . :, T � � i � i +^ �: i 1 � j� � � � �' „ , r :� T . i N I �� `\ .� .. j L; �'� 1 .; `. ` � ' ' � ' � � �` Y i •��► �� a� f. { AERIAL MAP 3G I L.s. #s�—oa 3H William Henley N I: �� 1 -L � �� ,m �r , . `zo.00 �,� �� ` /50.00 w � � J SITE PLAN ,� r�' * ' �. E � � �— — r,.y .. � � � � YL R� ° �, .� � -� , ... .. �� . � Z � . � . � a: } , � • � i '� � g.: `.1t J � ,i�n...::. � n.* �� 9f; Y • > �} f « /,_ ?_# i ,t�'" r t, •�:� `� 1,. �. � � � r V .i ': � ? . r�"'F •' .. . . _ � ��.., - � . . .... . s5 .,. _ �. �. � r ' � ; � � 'r.:'<�� .� r^ �'1�( � • r� ' trttl . � a Ak f �tix F'� Yc � y� ^A.:... ` ]f� < � ��'��'� i � � � � ''�� .. E w y . i�'t . � �. 4 V .Y ,�- � .1..x T I I i F �w M� � � p °'y��,.�3 �?5� � x F 01 �k "Kt� ` Y�P �'il �` �„ 'F.a� � .t.n- ��, �i5�•• �Sy�e _'P � . F� w�4.. � � j� .�c . . � .. � . � � E . f� S�F„' s . . > � z 4 ♦ ^ �t � �*x y {ie .• �F ` +t � ' �� , * .. r�. . � �.E � , . ,. ��n. - � �� z: - -. w . . ,u; ,..•. .rv�; . r _ . �'?�' _ . , : a�, . �,: 4 � `�� . `� .j \ y� F ; . , " 4�y � ,# � ,_ r ' °Aa� ; R3� „ �..�+��X �.:��'��~ � i M `}� " � T R , .. '4J`*;. .>. ` . .. .. �'. �.. . 1 6 . . . .. � . \ < .y.,� . /. , - . . . . § , . . .. � . . g �, ��s u .�' �� ' ' . . 9`.y� v ' , � c . R ' . 1..i �� . . y � � .�� y�. f � �� 4 � e £ f � #�� 4..�� h .� . _ ` . �:� ,� s- .. �.., . � �. ' *� ` - . �. � . . � .. .. .. . - . � . . ti. �� Y`1 � i f' �} � � u. t 4 � � � tl , ' A <, j_s ��^ e Y. ni �. t . � � ,r .. �.veiC�et+. . � � :. P:'Y' j,, . � . � � �, �/.0 � � �, ;� .'.� �:... .._ { : k y' � {�• . fe ^ . : ' �� n �� ,. � - � ' .wslM.r�T..r r ' � •� '� � � � : A �� '� � <�i; i' CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612)5i1-3450 REZONING RE(�UEST ZOA # � j/ VACATICIN REGIUEST SAV ��q 1 PLATTING REQUEST P.S. � RQ)UEST FEE �D j�Q PARK FEE RECEIFT $ v� G�� %.�- SQiIDULID H1�LR�'ING O�P4•SLSSION PIEETING IY�TE �/� (8� SQ�E�qLID CITY CUUNCIL t�ETING A4TE PROPERTY INFORMATION PROPERTY ADIi2FSS � � 9 � kE 2R. `�( L1J N��. F=P•. l 11. l.E � - L�AL DESCRIFtION: LQT � BLOCK �_ TRACi/ADDITION l�iE►aT►FE2 HI t�S ��LCND f�Dn iT�Cf.3 Pf2E5f2;T ZOIdING `�'- I R$ZUFSTID ZONII�G � r REASOta t�P, RSZL'FST: A site plan shoaing the proposed future use is required for a12 rez oning. (�} �-c� Tc � ��i,v�-G c= �r�rS Er�l& �� r o �v ,vo,2 ��!- sr�E o� ��v��eTy -- ***�**��*x*,r,r,r,r*********�**,k*****,+��**�tr****:***��*.*s*******��«*t************�**�* FEE OWNER INF4RMATION NAP1E (please print) (o i�(oE�2`�t /Y1DR-� �15D�vPHQ�7E # 5�? t �G4 1 � _ r��•s.� SIGIrF�URE ��,��-^- lY1TE d" - o�-% ' 8% hote to Contract �Purchase��+* �,�*,P,�''�,��is*�°i',k��*,�,�,�'*�,€' +,�,�**i�**�*��,°***�**,�*******�* �***�**�***:***�* �****** PETITIONER INFORMATION O UC� � ru,r� cpi�� nt) (� e�toorLy 02T�NS0,�1pxoNE #.C71- G y I i r�rss �! 9l kC/22y L�u �ie� DcF7' �� P- �� -87 �*.,*�*******,.***��*************„**,#****�*********�**.**,********�**.*.***�**�*** PLA.RTNING Q�Mt�1TSSI0N : aPxzwm QTY QJUNCII,: APfROJID STIHJLATIONS: �`�� i�� • �� ; _ GTYOF FRIDLEY sAV #s�—o9 4A Gregory Mortenson CIVIC CENTFR • 6�131 UNIVENSITY AVE. N.E. PRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 • PHONE (61'_) 57I-3�1�U SeptsN�er 2, 1987 'it7 WHOM IT Ng1Y OxICC�f22N: The City of Fridley Planning Conmission will be hatding an informal hearing on a request for a Vacation, SAV #87--09, b� Gregory Mortenson, to vacate the 6 foot drainage easement on the north side of Lot 3, Block 2, Heather Hills Seoond Additim, the same being 6I91 Kerry Lane N.E. Anyone who wishes to be heard shall be givq� the opport�ity at the Planning Camiission meeting on Weci�esday, September 16, 1987 in the Council Chamber of City Hall at 64'il University Avtr�ue N.E. at 7:30 p.m. 5P6VE B7LLIN„5 (IIAIRt+F�N Pf,AtalII� ODF4ffSSZON Gregory Mortenson SAV #87-09 Kurt Schrupp 6171 Kerry Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Donald Bratt 6181 Keny Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Gregory Plortenson 6191 Keny Lane N.E. Fridley, DR�I 55432 Lawrence Beckish 1481 Rice Creek Drive N.E. Fridley, r�I 55432 Robert Helberg 1491 Rice Creek Drive N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Michael Roach 6211 Rice Creek Drive N.E. Fridley, D�I 55432 Lee Vlraspir 6201 Rice Creek Drive N.E. Fridley, D'II�I 55432 Church o£ God of Prophecy 6191 Rice Creek Drive N.E. Fridley, D'1N 55432 Franklin Wibel 1421 Kerry Circle N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Karl Kreter 1420 Kerry Circle N.E. Fridley, P'IIV 55432 Bruce Anderson 1430 Kerzy Circle N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 James Schaffran 6180 Kerry Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Ronald Cadwell 6170 Kerry Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 sAV #s�—o9 y $ Greqory Mortenson Planning 9/2/87 Council MAILING LIST Denni.s Forstirom 6230 Rice Creek Drive N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Dennis Christensen 6220 Rice Creek Drive N.E. Fridley, NII�I 55432 Timothy Solberg 6210 Rice Creek Drive N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Daniel Allen 6200 Rice Creek Drive N.E. Fridley, MD7 55432 William Denker 6190 Rice Creek Drive N.E. Fridley, DII�] 55432 William Michaels 6180 Rice Creek Drive N.E. Fridley, YII�I 55432 John Crane 6170 Rice Creek Drive N,E. Fridley, r1N 55432 Richard Ferber 6160 Rice Creek Drive N.E. Fridley, DiTi 55432 Thrnias Beaulieu 6244 Kerry Lane N.E. Fridley, D'A1 55432 Thomas Beaulieu 11230 Partridge Street N.47. Coon P,apids, MN 55433 EUgene Schaefer 6240 Kerry Lane N.E. Fridley, P9N 55432 Michael Russini.k 6236 Kerry Lane N.E. Fridley, DIl�7 55432 Edward Clark 6251 Kerry Lane N.E. Fridley, P7N 55432 Patrick Ohern 6243 Kerry Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Larry Morford 6235 Kerry Iane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Robert Osman 1431 Rerry Circle N.E. Fridley, NIN 55432 sAV #a�—o9 4C SAV �i87-09 6191 Kerry Lane NE. Gregory Mortenson `,. wNe EYs �: ti , � �J.�. _"/�"_. . p ..� .! �wo �� `�1� � 4p1' �,. i�. � � / I . y{% Y l� ♦ ly L lY *.� i� . N+) '— I O I L �' � .Y�� /f �/� �/1 �/% , `� 'i`a ' _ � `• � ` I . - ,� b� � ♦ . e�isiii. �.., u.f � µ�.f s.FY�iu T � _^ RD.E . RO.EA? J � .1 'A J� ��(KI '--, — ', - . . _ � � . . , . �r � �e� r�) .x n`t.., - r/3I0% �� l3� � �sf) (!+i � . . � .. �r �`irv �� l v /�M� . W : Gr6aJ G,ab� 4 3 (�� (iooJ �iOPa) C940/,` C86� ^ (er� e � 4 T Z ` ., _ G> �• � �4✓.rre//[. t c . �¢ %Z�. �� 8 G _ ¢ �'L o 1'Heem n � � " ,�, i �1� � i i (�e) r ty�� (n) t Yf) °S G 1 /„r , --- -- — --- � �t�A �.x." s^ ' . ,,. . „� . n� , .o „� ... ,.. ,,, ._ _ __ _ -- 4 �Tr— Tg� A6D. r a: �, . J, � , --- �--nrr,�:tc`° � �,• , , 1 .., »� � � � ' � ([) I iAi � l� (ngJ � (•6) i,>. � � � � / s � � ,\0 , �r��> C � : i � �� l% � � � . M -� : /: a{d "� lie.r6 Li � �� I%J I (tf) ,f ..� Oio��,c �Q?� � i (.^'� o) ^ (3o s i �< 8 1 3 o P f •• %ri� .v> �ras �) � �f> (o� i 5 r�, ,. �� l Q1 I � l..r ,a {� iH � � �''. � 3 �. F � %A • ,ar: :. 1t n a+ 4� , Q CYJ � . . ., _ � 3 $ � (�j� ..� .s�a� px „ �� i ' . . �.� �'f rt.� . �1 8 3 f Y� fl ��(ie)3��' �� '�� h �. � � A - � ,, � � � ` � 2 �8 ' � � � , , j� -` O�t1VE i r,� ��G'�+ F ` . , ^ . � �`� o; '` >> ' ' u. : �r f � : � �� ? � �e, �*��(l�..r �:�� ' �� nin : N'OODSIDE CT. t i � 'L/ . o � O � - 5 � ¢_. ., � � p t�' i �'r ` i' �� 2 '� t \_ r °; 3� � d _ . � ?, � d (/�J t t S�'AJ N .�"' / i �.�'i. ` , �^. � t,� �- F� �� ° W > �''� �� 3 : � — e- . � a , � • �� - • 6 � 8 � � � ' u 7 G� g k � f) �'. � 't : : i) � f BZ ` �; , p�e Y � � V. . � . 2 e �� h'. SU� 9�e 7~ ��i. �t)) _ � ��) ,� ��r.�, �, 'e'' � 2c(�91 / 7 i °" � N) ac •.�,�J .. �� ..,r. , f -7 E �� 3 � � wN�� . ��-�,rr.� glyy�:, + JT0.✓'�`'ZH , ��' l��[�•�� C�J � ....ilrrg,.. "�� 5� t ��. �� A n �0 4 Cm� ; B , Y � . , � :� � � - ff ^.•r �� ,�°.. : ,.T '3 i' ° � . c. z;. N/Y � � d < �• , . e 4 �. t +. _/ LL% .. . o' 4/JD / r t•� ,<!O!<� ^ C4Q ��' c. y �I/% a �k'� '`� �A� n y�:N%� � (�/ a c'��. �i�. �g;. e.�.-�'� 4;�' /r� h B Ialf �e i � ,., � ;� . 9 �� .,u .d%; � : .� - . ,, r . ;. .y ° s: t : 2 � g .�+" e, ` C51� .e: ,�� i (N) • � � � ..,�. . `c 7 a � „ �" . .rH )➢:N.� f ..�� Is eIw � f; t� 9��; ,; 5 S /�% t � . / " I '�e, .. '. �� 6' ' � 2 ./0 y",. `s«�ur \// _ :� z , ,:,, 8 .'` �„' �n� � �+> �u) ° , Fk,aK� �$T � F' a. >a -.:. . ...le.._. , ._. ._ �e � y � a �' r .n�.e.• �.i, ('O� �� ,..<, K6..a. �„� ._ - aH/L c a /2� T` : PARK �. ,J �� • . . "'' � �.� / � . �t �� a Gi . � p ' � �' 6 I ,� � . t s (.nJ ' ',,, s z�= � � �': : i 's ' .• � - T �� i+\ �IA/C� ' �v . � A ' � . ,�'�wr�w� S r.esixw - " P no` �a� (s,� <M (•w � � ee � s r � � / - : P (�) (ia� (u) a, Y« (n7 . �. � •, C�J � � . : 4..: ,J � ' /O 9 h d . ' : � s .ni"�. .. -.vd ., i ' : : � .. �'�: Z � ' , TJe ' _... �A,• ._....; . -ui ..._. _...� __. � ..... "" '... .. j . XN�K-xt � rA��N.NM l LOCATION MAP CERTtFICATE OF FOR CR�U MoRTE*lSON INEpEBY CEHTIFT TMAT TNIS SURVEY. PLAM.ON REPOfl� WAS PflEPAREO BT ME QR UNOER MY D+RECT SUPEAVISION AN THA7 1 AM A DULY EIJ�GISTERED LAN SU VEYQN UNOF�q TNE L�F�tlE STATE OF MINNESOT� MINNESOT/! NO. ICQ SAV #87-09 SURVEYGreg Mortenson KURTH SURVEYING INC. 4002 JEFFERSON STREET N.E. LOLUMBIA HFIGH7S MINNESOTA 33421 612-JBB-9769 OATE _8-10-�7 SCALE 1°� 2O' O�IRON MONUMENT SC'C �� . �� r.W4lD LoT 3, ��-�CK �. ��-'iCl��'t-�ER ri1lLS Z��DZT�DFa, /�iOw�. CO��•� , t�/l1�►sL�oTO. 'cz K � sa :�; \ 4 ! � � GTYOF FRIDLEI( SAV #87-09 PLANNING DIVISION Gregory Mortenson MEMORANDUM I�END 7p; Jock Robertson, Ca�m�anity Develognent Director MEPD FROM: Myca Wickl.acz, I'lanning Assistam M1yy hEhD IY�T'E: September 10, 1987 RF�ARDING: Mortenson Variance Re�uest 1'80ffiS�Li Origirally the proposal was to oonstruct an addition to the existing house, which would be 4.4 feet fran the lot lire and ev� with the existing house. 7he existing c,prage attached to the house is currently in the 6 foot easement � the rorth side of the propecty and is actually 4.6 feet fran the lot line, rnt 4.4. BACKGImU6D: On September 1, 1987, the Appeals Cormnission denied the request for a Variance to alloa the additim to the house. 'Ihe Appeals Comnission approved the Variance fran 5 feet to 4.6 feet instead of 4.4 feet for khe existing c�cage only, and rot for tr�e rew addition on the house. The petitioner is still seeking apprwal for the Vacatian d�e to the existing cprage glacenent. �he Vacation will proceed to the City Co�cil in October. : iil,ulyl. \�� : • l �equent to the Appeals Comnission reviEw, the petitioner is now seeking apptwal foi tt�e Variance to oanstruct the addition 8.4' versus 10' from the lat lire. 4his change will bring the addition out oE the 6' easPment. [�GW/m3w � �F sAV �s�-o9 4 G Gregory P7ortenson Parks Sveets Maintenance MEMORANDUM TO: Darrel Qark, Building Insgector Fi�87-297 FROM: �tk L. Burdi, Asst. Public Wocks Director DATE: Septanber 2, 1987 SUBJECT: Drainage Easement at 6191 Kerry Lane, N.E. We have revi�red the requiranent for a drairtzge easement along the mrth side of the property at 6191 Kerry Lane and agree that this easnent rt�y be vacated if desized b� the property awner. Surf ace water which flows between this home and the home to the nocth should not be affected bi vacating this ease�nent and building on a portion of it. M.B/ts � CJIY OF Fi21DLEY �, CITY OF FRIDLEY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEE`LING AUGUST 13, 1987 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Commers called the August 12, 1987, Housing & Redevelopment Authority meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Larry Commers� John Meyer, Duane Prairie, Virginia Scnnabel Members Absent: Walter Rasmussen Others Present: Jock Robertson, HRA Executive Director Mark Eurch, Asst. Public Works Director Rick Pribyl, Finance Director Julie Burt, Asst. Finance Director Jim Hill, Asst. City Manager Virgil Herrick, City Attorney June & Louis Lundgren, 343 Kellogg Blvd., St. Yaul, MN, SSiO. Gerald Sunde, Sunde Engineering Mervyn Mindess, Subterranean Engineering APPR06`AL OF JULY 9, 1987, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHOHITY MINti1'ES: MOTIOR BY MS. SCHNABEL, SECONDED BY MR. MEYER, TO APPROVE THE JULY 9, i987, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AOTHORITY MINUTES. P1r. Meyer ir.dicated that on page 7, paragraph 8, line 3, the first word of the line should be "cost" per cubic yard, etc. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS, DECLARED THE MIIdUTES APPROVED AS AMENDED. l. CONSIDERATION OF LOU LUNDGREN'S LETTER OF CREDIT Plr. Lundgren stated he had several things going, but at this time does not have a financing commitment. He has received from Miller & Schroeder the conditions under which Lhey will sell bonds which includes taking the risx out of the construcLion aspect. The construction lender would need to include a breakeven occupancy. Lznders do not like to do this; however, he is workiub with a local hank to undertake this condition. This should happen next week. Mr. Lundgren has been approached by the Towle Company and will help make the project work. They have indicated two persons who may be interested ir, financing, but they have not yet responded. Other avenues are availaole under the same terms as before but they require someone to pick up a lar�e amount of equity. Mr, Lundgren stated he was closer to an agreement anu very optimistic. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, AUGUST 13, 1987 PAGE L ��- Mr. Schnabel asked Mr. Lundgren how feasible he thought it would be to meet t the requirements of Miller 6 Schroeder. Mr. Lundgren thought it was feasible, but just had not worked. He stated that he could show staff his numbers. There is money available, but the terms are not easy. yr. Lundgren stated that he is detezmined to get done and will do what it takes to accomplish it. Mr. Meyer asked what the area market is for housing. Mr. Lundgcen indicated that, when Mr. Maxfield was here, there was a marxet here while perhaps there was not in other ateas. The Towle Company approached him because they are convinced there is a market heie and Towle is a very substantial, good firm. Mr. Commers reminded Mi. Lundgren that still pending before the commission is the revocation of a letter of credit which has been and remains tabled. Since no other proposal has been brought before the commission, this item remains tabled. 5. CONSIDERATIOy OF LAKE POINTE PAD A EXCAVATION CNANGE ORDER PSr. Robertson reported that last Wednesday he was notified by the project engineei that an error was discovered for relocated Pad A, which was initiated in April/Ma��. Subterranean Engineering was asked to redesign the Pad to the south so the earth work would equal ou*_ to the original. Tllrough a series of correspondence between Subterranean and Sunde, the exira cost was not found until Enebak was about to begin work. In the meantime, in Julp, k'oodbridge had approved the relocated Pad A. He�said that he met with Mr. Sunde and Mr. Herrick. The choices were to: 1) proceed with a modilied °ad A and later assign extra cost, 2) order Enebak to stop all work and pap him to wait for HRA decision, or 3) order Enebak to proceed with modifications of a reduced Pad A to eliminate the extra cost. After consulting with Mr. Herrick, Woodbridge was notified of the error and asked to make a decision. They were quite reluctant to approve the extra cost. -The letzer of July 10 states they would not agree with the extra cost. He asked Mr. Sunde and Mr. Mindess [o be here this evening to give a more detailed description of what happened. The Commission has before them a recommendation to proceed with Change Order �i4, dated August 10, for $38,�50. Mr. Mindess stated that in calculating the volume of earth work they allowed no more than normal. But, this job is unique in that it has extra large pads to allow Woodbridge flexibility in positioning buildings. The error in calculation affects the east half of the south portion of Pad A. Also, when digging began in this area, peat was found which changes the volume. To his undeistanding, based on the borings, Subterranean drew an excavation contour and had a contour plan prior to bidding. This is an unusual project because some of the other buildings on the west portion of the site were suggested to be constructed on piles, but are going to be built on footinbs. Mr. Prairie indicated that change orders are totalling �222,000 and asked if the work was nearly completed or could they expect additional chan�e orders. �`s HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, AUGUST 13, 1987 YAGE 3 Mr. Sunde indicated that the only possible change order he could foresee would deal with excess material at the end of the job and that Eneuacn maintains it is nat their responsibility to naulit away. Approximately 600,000 yards of dirt are in this project. The original contract stateu it is the contractor's responsibility to dispose of it off the site, For some reason, the arbitrator says if you have to impozt sand, we pay to for importing sand. If maierial is to be hauled away,We would pay to haul it away. There is a difference in interpretation. Mr. Sunde felt tnere woula not be a significant excess of materials on the job. Any excess materials would more than likely be black dirt or organics. The position is that tney will not pay to haul away excess materials. He felt the job woulti Galance. If there is excess black dirt on the site, iY can be left there ana the City will use it on other projects. There must be 6 inches of top soil on the site. Mr. Prairie questioned if this would not have happened if Woodbridge had put up the building in January. Mr. Sunde stated that if a definite building is going in, tnere is no need to have the over-size pads. When looking at the section at the south end of Pad A, there is about 5-6 feet of poar quality sand, S-6 feet of black dirt, below that is clay that had to be removed to support a foundation. Mr. Prairie stated there are four contracts and asked when they would ue completed. Mr. Sunde felt they would be done by the end of October. Enebacx plans to get the turf cover down to cut erusion. Mr. Burch indicated that the landscape contractor plans to finish tnis fall also. Mr. Meyer asked for clarification of what the $2.50 per yara for soil excavation by backhoe would include. Mr. Sunde stated that the layer of organic soils must be removea which will be done by backhoe. This accounts for the excavation of soils tnat cannot oe bulldozed and is only in the extended area of the pad. Mr, Meyer stated that on Change Order ll3 the agreement is to buy sand at $1.00 per yard and compact and replace at 25¢ per yard. Where does this come in? P1r. Sunde stated this was the price agreed upon for sand mining for the notel pad. For Pad A, the hole can be filled with compacted clay at a very high density. The reason is that the building for Pad A is a low tise builditig with a lower footing pressure. Mr. Meyer asked at what rate the clay goes back to fi11 the hole, $Z.50 per yard? Mr. Sunde stated it would basically be $1.25 for excavation and replacement. The big hole will be dug out and filled back in for a total of $1.25 per yarti. The organics would be dug ouL and replaced with something else for �2.50 yaru. Mr. Herrick stated the change order should state Lhat this price includes removal, replacement and compaction of materials. The assumption is that it would be done according to the plans and specifications, but it would not hurt to refer to a specific portion of the plans and specs. HOUSIhG S REDEVELOPMEhT AUTHORITY MEETING, AUGUST 13, i987 PAGE 4 Mr. Sunde stated their intent is not to pay for putting materials back in. He will clarify this question on the change order. MOTION BY MR. MEYER, SECONDED BY MS. SCHNABEL, TO APPROVE CHAnGE ORDER 4i4 WITH THE ASSUMPTION OF PRICE OF EXCAVATION OUT AND MATERIAL IN IS $2.50 PER YARD AND THAT ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATION BE MADE TO THE GONTRAGTOR AS TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF WNAT THE MATERIAL IS AhD TO BE COMPACTED. UPOn A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. INFORMATION ON LAKE POIRTE DETENTION POi�D - YOTENTIAL CHANGE ORDER ANll IRRIGATIOfi Mr. Robertson stated this is now a consideration of change order. request from Woodbridge for two additional change orders. Ttem ll6 on tnE agenda concerns the change order for design and finishing of the retentiori ponds. Mr. Burch estimates in consultation with the landscape architect that the change in the retention ponds will improve the appearance and save from $30,000-$50,000 in actual costs. Members were referred to correspontience dated August 10 from Jon McClure requestin� the change order. Mr, Burch thought the change is somethingthat would be dr_sireable. This item was discussed several weeks ago. After discussing with Woodbrid�e, they agreed with the change. Mr. Herrick indicated his impression is that Woodbridge is trying to kee� costs down. This is one area where costs uill be reduced as well as the next proposed item which is consistent. MOTION BY MR. PRAIRIE, SECOrDED BY MS. SCHNABEL, TO AYYROVE THE CHANGE ORDER WITH RESPECT TO THE POnDING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTI01 CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Robertson indicated that the change order regaidin� irrigation is to omit the irrigation in the original contract. We received the request in writing in a letter of August 10, 1987, from Jon McClure to John Flora. Staff recommends that this change ordei not be consideted based on the City Council's expression that they wished the areas to be seeded and irrigated to prevent erosion problems and for aesthetics. Theestimated savings is 520,000. Mr.Aerrick stated the original plan that was submitted by Ernst provided there was to be irrigation on all undeveloped areas. Earlier there was discussion to eliminate irrigation from Pad C assuming it would be built on this fall. To his understanding, anything not built upon would be irrigated, including Pad C. When asked if this was included in the plan approved by Woodbridge, staff provided a positive answer, Mr. Robertson stated that the temporary irrigation costs about $20,000. The entire area would have pipes. As buildings were constructed, the pipes and heads would be removed. - HDllSInG & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, AUGUST 13, 1987 PAGE 5 Mr. Robertson stated that the intent is that during the 15-year development project the City wanted a good ground cover to teduce wind and water erosion until the project was completed, hater for irriga2ion is furnished by the City. Ms. Schnabel asked if there were other ways to accomplish the same end. Mr. Robertson stated the irrigation was felt to be the most cost effective way to maintain. Other methods are labor intensive which is very costly. Mr. Burch stated there are two ground covers - seed and sod. The sod is along the boulevards with automatic irrigation. No debate exists over this. The other areas are seeded areas where building will be built in the future and that is where the question arises. The intent was to have those areas irrigated to have a green area and to have it look good and to prevent erosion. On the original contract, all that was included except Pad C. Several weeks ago, the commission considered a change order where irrigation was added to Pad C because there is no commitment to build. Tne reGuest now is to eliminate irrigation on all seeded areas where buildings are to go. Ernst Associates, when asked about the savings, estimated it to be $20,000 - half to be paid b}� the City and half by the HRA. CIt. Herrick indicated there is an argument about the payment. If the City's view prevails, the City would pay half and Woodbridge would pay half. Woodbridge wants the City to pay all. By eliminating irrigation, Woodbridge appears to be aLtempting to reduce costs on a non-essential item. Ms. Schnabel felt that $20,000 on a 15-year proposal was not a big item. MOTIOn BY PIS. SCHNABEL, SECOnDED BY MR. PRAIRLE> TO RECEIVE THE LETTER ADDHESSED TO JOHn FLORA, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, DATE➢ AUGUST 10, 1987, FROM JOn MCCLURE REGARDING THE ELIMINATION OF THE IRRIGATIOh SYSTE�I. UPOR A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTI�G AYE, CHAIRPERSO� COMMERS DECLAREU THE M01'I06 CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PIr. Meyer asked if there was any legality that the letter was addressed to Mr. Flora rather than the HRA. Mr.Herrick stated that this is not a concern. Mr. Flora is appointed as engineer for the HRA so he can transmit documents to the commission. MOTION BP MS. SCHNABEL, SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRIE, TO CONSIDER THc, REQUESI' ArD TO DENY THE REQUEST TO DELETE THE IRRIGATION CONTRACT THE YIYES ARU WATER SYSTEMS On PAD SITES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIAPERSON COMMERS DECLAREU THE MOTIOti CARRIED UNANIMOUSLF. Mr. Commers requested Mr.Herrick instruct Woodbridge in writing what the commission has decided. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETZNG, AUGUST 13, i987 PAGE 6 � Ms. Schnabel stated that she had not yet been to the Lake Pointe area and requested arrangements be made for an on-site tour of the area so that the commission would be more aware of what they are dealing with. Mr. Commers agreed that a tour would enhance their understanding of the issues and asked Mr. Ro6ertson to make arrangements fot a tour of the area prior to the next HRA meeting. Mr. Robertson stated another area of concern is access to the site when the work is done. Should the area be open, bariicaded, or closed with a gate which can be opened by a key? The set-up needs to allow the City to finish their work and allow Woodbridge to bring in potential customers. Mr.Herrick stated the City's liability would be the same as other public properties. The City has umbrella coverage. The greatest liability is now when there are holes and mounds of dirt. After leveling is done, the risk is not any greater than in the parks but there are chances of vandalism, theft, etc. Mr. Commers requested Mr. Robertson to develop a proposal and present to the commission. Mr. Prairie stated that in the public hearings with home owners there are certain things they could use. Mr. Burch stated that homeowners can use the walkways. Mr. Herrick recommended that the road not be open to general traffic. 2. COhSIDERATION OF RICE CF COSTS dITY ENGINEERING FEES Mr. Robertson indicated that along with the detail cost estimates requested by HRP., he had asked SEH to include other items in the area of T.H. 65 and Moore Lake area that are on the agenda for improvement. Mr. Robertson felt there might be some cost savings if other portions of the project were under[aken simultaneously or in sequence with each other. The components as included in the agenda total from $L15,�00 to-$127,000 wi�th no package di.scount. The commission was asked to consider the Rice Creek Road package. It is [he desire o fthe Cit}�Council that this be done.as soon as possible with the intersection between Old Central and T.H. 65 which is under conttact under SEH. This is necessary to state Rice Creek Road immediately [o serve the Moore Lake Commons which was approved b} Cit} Council last month. This includes both the estimated fees of $42,000 to $52,500 for plans, specifications, etc., and $50,500 for construction related services. Ms. Schnabel asked if it was common practice to take saiary rates and multiply by 2.1. Mr. Meyer stated this is low. Generally the factor of 2.5 is used. Mr. Robertson suggested staff be auihorized to negotiate a package discount if SEH were to do more of this than just Rice Creek Road. HOUSIhG & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, AUGUST 13, 1987 PAGE 7 Mr. Robertson stated that the construction would not be done but the engineeiing �QUld proceed this fall. We have a preliminary design for Rice Creek Road and this proposal is for detaiZed designs. The plan provides two lattes for traffic in each direction plus an additional left turn lane. Mr. Burch stated that the future plans will consider turning Old Central into a parkway. Mr. Robertson stated they have looked at the estimates for Rice Creek Road and asked if staff should try to negotiate a package. The question was raised as to why staff was working with SEH on this project rather than another firm. Mr. Burch indicated the City started working with SEH on this project because of their expertise on this type of project. Their engineer had formerly worked with MnDOT and knows their requirements. They are the experts on intersection design. Staff had interviewed other companies; but SEH is best qualified. rI0TI0n BY PfR. MEYER, SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRIE, TO APPROVE THE PROYOSAL AS GIVEn. UPOr A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSOn COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. COASIDERATION OF UNTGERSIT] AVENUE (T.H. 47) hIEDZAN TREATP1EhT Mr. Robertson stated that at the July meeting, Mr. Barry Warner presented a number of alternatives for treatment of inedians. Staff was asked to review the options and come back with a recommendation. Staff tried to consider the trade off in additional investment in landscaping and maintenance implications. Fhat staff proposes after looking at the twelve alternatives is a scheme where an additional investment is put in at the intersections, but to save cosis this be confined to the intersection. Between intersections it is recommended to proceed with a bit more visual variety th�ough shrubs and wildflowers. MnDO'1 is working with native flowers, which do not have the mowing and maintenance costs, are very hardy, provide better moisture retention, and add color. These are recommended for demonstration sections. The ne�ative part is that, if the entire median were done in wildflohers, there may be a perception by some of the public that it is untended and wi1d. At this time, the wildflocaers would be interspersed with turf. Mr. Prairie asked about weed control with wildflowers. Mr. Robertson sTated that once the wildflowers are establish they tend to choke out weeds. Schematics of the designs were presented. The intersection treatments would extend only as far as the turn lanes which is where traffic slows and treatments would get the most attention. The recommendation is a combination of treatments and staff have no costs at this time. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AllTHOAITY MEETING, AUGUST 13, 1987 PAGE 8 Mr. Robertson stated the demonstration intersections would be from 57th to ; 63rd and from 73rd to Osborne for a total of 4 intersections. This can then be evaluated to see if we like it. If the commission likes the recommended design, staf£ will go back and get the costs. Ms. Schnabel stated she liked doing a number of different treatments, but felt it could get too busy. Mr. Robertson stated a lower cost alternative is to plant the medians exlusively in wildflowers which could be achieved. P1r. Prairie indicated comments on the park for the first few yeais was that the wildflowers did not look good. Mr. Burch noted that after efforts to disk and reseed,the area looks better. People that know wildflowers like the look. Ms. Schnabel stated that new turf would be an improvement to a lot of people. Mr. Herrick indicated the other side is maintenance. MnDOT mows 2 or 3 times per summer. Mr. Burch stated the city took over maintenance this year and the appearance was better. Mr. Robertson stated that the fence between 63td and 69th was painted black to see what the impact was. The designs included along University will be used in other areas also. Ms. Schnabel stated she would like to see a mix of trees and that they be placed away from traffic. Mr. Robertson stated that the schematic used a variety of trees. The design has trees in clusters Hith different trees being used in each cluster. MOTION BY MR. PRAIRIE, SECONDED BY MS. SCHnABEL, FOR STAFF TO GO FORWARD '1'0 THE NEXT STEP WITH THE UNIVERSITY AVENUE PROJECT. Mr. Meyer asked if Jersey barriers would be included in the urban section. Mr. Robertson stated barriers would be used to protect the trees but would not run the entire length. Mr. Burch stated the barriers could be poured in place, could be painted, or constructed with treated wood. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTIOn CARRiED UnANIMOUSLY. 4. CONSIDERATION OF COMPLETION OF PASCHKE PONDING AREA Mt. Commers requesCed an update on this item. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING, AUGUST i3, 1987 YAGE 9 Mr.Herrick indicated that in discussing the issue with Mr. Burch, if he is not able to get the problem resolved and if he can document what Mr. Paschke has done does not meet what the plans called for, then we proceed. As long as there is evidence to establish that what Mr. Paschke has done does not coriespond with the plans� he suggested someone else do the work. At this point a decision must be made. MOTION BY MR. MEYER, SECONDED BY MS. SCHNABEL, TO AllTHORIZE STAFF TO GO FORWARD AND AWARD BIDS TO FINISH PONDING TO THE LOW BIDDER IF THE CITY DOES NOT REACH A SATISFACTORY AGREEMENT WITH MR. PASCHKE. Mr. Meyer indicated that the letter of March 6, 1987, is an agreement to do a numbers of things, including a hedge, roll up fire door, and overflow control structures. Completion should include all items. Mr. Burch stated that the only things in the bids includes grading and seeding of the pond and construction of an overflow. Mr. Commers asked staff to report on all items at next month's meeting. UYOn A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSOP COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. I�FORMATIOn ON CIVIC CENTER BI-LEVEL PARKING RAMP Mr. Robertson stated this is an information item. The commission and City Council have acted on the preliminary approval of the concept. Borman Associates are proceeding with estimates for a parking ramp along with the redesign and remodeling of the Civic Center. The estimate for the ramp is $765,000. Mr. Robertson stated he checked with several independent sources and their rate was essentially $8,000 to $8,500 per stall. The cost is for excavation below ground. Mr. Commers questionned the financing of the ramp. Mr. Robertson said the records indicated that the HRA intended to participate. Mr. Pribyl stated there are no assessments at this time. Mr. Prairie asked if there was a parking problem by the clinic. Mr. Robertson did not think there tias but there is a problem outside the Civic Center. Mr. Prairie asked the status of the clinic. Mr. Pribyl stated the clinic has one year to go on their option on that land. Otherwise, they lose their option. Mr. Meyer felt the figure of $7,500 per parking stall was a high estimate. Mr. Robertson stated he had gotten a rule oF thumb figure of $8,000-58,500 for the same thing. HOUSIIG 5 REDEVELOPMEhT AUTHORITY MEETING, AUGUST 13, 1987 PAGE i0 Mr. Robertson stated that, in the development district, there are some cross i� agreements to provide parking for the office building. ' PIr. Pribyl stated that part of the original agreement is to provide a certain number of parking spots. The City has provided the appropriate number of spots that are in the agreement. The parking ramp itself would be in the tax increment district. Mr. Commers stated the commission needs to know how the ramp would be financed. Mr. Pribyl stated he was going through the accounts and taking every expenditure and applying it to a source. The money for the ramp would come from an unrestricted pool. Mr. Commers asked about funding for the city hall expansion. Mr. Pribyl indicated that the City has set aside funds for City Hall. 8. CLAIMS Pir. Pribyl stated that the commission would be acting on Claims 4f1631-1646. Mr. Commers asked if the City has an on-going trial balance for HRA. Mr. Pribyl stated the city has the information and could prepare a summary trial balance for the commission. P1r. Commers requested staff to prepare a summary trial balance for the HRA. MOTION BY MS. SCHNABEL, SECONDED BY MR. PRAIRIE, TO APPROVE THE CHECK REGISTER AS SUBMITTED. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON COMMERS DECLARED THE MOTIOn CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADJOURNMEnT: MOTION BY MR. PRAIRIE, SECONDED BY MR. MEYER, TO ADJOURn THE MEETING. UPOn A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSOK COP7MERS DECLARED THE AUGUST 13, 1957, HOUSING S REDEVELDPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, _ �,�-e-��J � ��J Lavonn Cooper � - Recording Secretary � CITY OF FRIDLEY ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 18, 1987 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Svanda called the August 18, 1987, Environmental Quality Commission meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Richard Svanda, Maynard Nielson, Wayne Wellan Members Absent: None Others Present: Myra Gibson Wick:lacz, Planning Assistant APPROVAL OF JUNE 16, 1987, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Wellan, seconded 6y Mr. Nielson, to approve the June t6, i987, Environmental Quality Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SVANDA DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNAnIMOUSLY. 1. Status Report on Anoka County and Met Council Funding Ms. Wicklacz statedthat the 50� per household rebate from the Metropolitan Council had ended and the $4/ton program ended in June. The City has .zceived their last paynent irom that progrars.� 3he Boj :,couts - received $243.00 for 60.75 tons of newspaper collected back to September 1986; S.O.R.T. collected 56.19 tons of recycleables including used oil for $224.76 which is kept by the City and used toward S.O.R.T.; and the curbside recycling program collected 93 tons and got $372.24. The total amount received was about $840. Ms. Wicklacz indicated that the County has hired a SoliZ Waste Abate:�ent gpecialist to assist Norn Shifer L The Anoka County Board is reviewing the master plan on August 25. Ms. Wicklacz will attend that meeting. If accepted, the plan will go to the Metropolitan Council. The funds fron zbatenent are being distributed to the counties and the coUnties are then disbursing the monies. Fridley should receive the same amount as before although staff are trying to increase the amount. Ms. Wicklacz did not think Fridley would get additional grant awards. On September 2, Anoka County is planning to get together a Solid Waste Task Force which Ms. Wicklacz plans to attend. If she cannot, a commission member may be designated. Anoka County Cormi�sioner Paui ticCarton is the chairman of the task force. ENVIRONMENTAL OIiALITY COMMISSION MEETING. AUGUST 18, 1987 YAGE 2 Mr. Wellan asked if this included the Elk River facility. Ms. Wicklacz stated that this is actually a part of the master plan to bet other cities on line and Fridley, Columbia Heights and Sprin� Lake Park are there to show that recycling programs can work and give support. Ms. Wicklacz is in an association for recycling managers with members from other cities in the area who get together monthly to discuss possible programs and what others fiave done. Ms. Wicklacz stated that Super Cycle is providing service for most of the netropolitan area. Ms. Wicklacz stated she would be meeting tomorrow with three other recipients of a puhlic information grant to do in-school training. West Hennepin, Columbia Heights and Champlin are all doing something in their school districts. They wi11 meet to share notes ao a� not to duplicate what others are doing. 2. 1987-1988 Fridley Budget for Recycling Ms. Wicklacz distributed copies of the Recycling Program Grants Budget, which includes the household rebate and tonnage re6ate. These funds were included because the City should receive a like amount through the county. Also included are two grants received by the City. The DPS Grant includes salaries for energy related items also. Mr. Wellan asked about the code enforcement. Ms. Wicklacz indicated that this is part of the DPS Grant of which half is for recycling and half is for energy. The portion for code enforcement is for doing inspections on rental builcings to cee i� chey are er.erg� efficient. Taking this into consideration, the actual budgeted amount for recyclinb is approximately $40,000. 3. Update on Curbside Recycling Developments Ms. Wicklacz distributed copies of the flyers that were mailed and the new logo. Signs are being made up for each area indicating the Fridays pick ups are scheduled for that area. Quite a number of people have shown an interest in getting signs. At this time, the signs will be made as they were before .unless another method can be found. Ms. Wicklacz indicated a problem continues with missed pick ups. Super Cycle missed s neighborhood. They were called and made aware of the problem and when Super Cycle returned, they went to the wrong area. Ms. Wicklacz stated she had sent the names and addresses of those people to Super Cycle and has requested they be sent a letter of apology. It is important to maintain interest in the program. A follow up will be done with the block captain to see if the letters are sent. Mr. Nielson noted that a hauler also comes through on Friday and asked if there was any confusion about what is to be recycled and what is to be hauled away as garbage. Ms. Wicklacz indicated that recycleables are usually in paper bass and the haulers have been notified that the =ecycling program exists. n r 4 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 18, t987 YAGE 3 ' Ms. Wicklacz stated two posters are being developed to be put up at � Holiday, Target, area churches, etc., to inform people about the probram and to increase interest in the program. Mr. Svanda asked if a follow up was planned. Ms. Wicklacz stated she was planning to do something in the fall. At this time, she is working on missed pick ups so the recyclin� probram does not lose people. Something will be put in the fall newsletter alou� with something on composting. Ms. Wicklacz distributed copies of a flyer from Anoka County containinb information on recycling services available in tne county and tne materials accepted. Some of the informaLion on the handout had chan�ed or was incorrect, and Ms. Wicklacz stated she would work to have tne informatioii updated. Ms. Wicklacz stated Lhe compost site has been waterea daily and tutneti once every week or so. An area church is having a grass and leaf pick up in ihe fall and had asked if they could bring those materials to the S.O.R.S. site. Ms. Wicklacz has told them they could. 4. Update on S.O.R.T. Developments Ms. Wicklacz stated she is working to get a sign put uQ for S.O.R.S. A proposed sketch of the sign was shown to the members. It is felt tt�at a good location for the sign is where the Anoka County sign is but placed lower. Ms. Wicklacz stated she is planning to sen@ out a flyer for S.u.R.T. to target neighborhoods and apartment dwellers. Mr. Nielson stated he haQ been at the site and felt it looked �unky and in need of mowing. Ms. Wicklacz indicated she is working to get better oarrels for tnem. Tne City is to do the mowing, and she will check to see what is beinb dorie. 5. Discussion on City Involvement in MPCA Household Hazardous Waste Program Mr. Svanda indicated that the MPCA is working on putting to�etner application materials and developing the criteria by which to ranA cities on the basis of their proposals for a household hazardous waste collection pro�ram. Initial collections are planned for the fall. After an ay�ro�riation is received from the legislature, the MPCA wi11 need to get a contract for transportation and disposal. Ms. Wicklacz stated she had received calls from residents wantin� to know where they could dispose of their household hazardous wastes. Mr. Svanda stated this varies depending on the material. Some wastes, sucn as leftover paint, can be dried and disposed of with the garbage. If a question arises, the callers can be referred to Susan Rid�ely at the MYCA or the staff dealing with household hazardous waste. They would snare whatever information they have. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEEIING, AUGUST 18, 1987 YAG£ 4 Ms. Wicklacz stated she would like to put somethin� in the newsletter. Residents have also been calling uanting to know how to dispose of used batteries. Mr. Svanda stated that starting January 1, i988, anyone selling batteries will have to accept used batteries. Also on January 1, 1988, anyone selling oil must either collect used oil or post a sign indicatin� where used oil can be taken. He recommended contacting these places and havin� them post a sign indicating Fridley's collection site for used oil. Mr. Svanda stated the MPCA has staf£ who work with companies who recycle used batteries and work with haulers to pick up used batteries; however, used batteties cannot be put on the curb. The most difficult hazardous waste to get rid of would be 6anned pesticides. If is very difficult to find someone who wi11 take banned pesticides. Mr. Svanda recommended that Ms. Wicklacz keep in contact with the staff and work through Ms. Ridgely's office to get what information they have. This may ensure that Fridley is on ti�e mailing list when the requirements for the hazardous waste program are sent. In addition to financial support, a requirement may be what other support will be provided and what will be done to carry the program forward. The M�CA is lookin� at 20 collections per year. If Fridley cannot do this in the fall, other programs will be conducted next spring and surtuner. 6. Other Business a. Ms. Wicklacz distributed copies of an article on the Twin Cities and their goals for waste management which was printed in the Aubust i5S7 World Wastes. b. Mr. Wellan asked if any recommendations had been received for new members for the commission. Ms. Wicklacz indicated the City Council would recommend a person for membership and she had heard of no action at this iime. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Mr. Nielson, seconded by Mr. Wellan, to adjourn the meeting. L'PON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SVANDA DECLARED THE AUGUST iS, 1987, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:25 P.M. Respectfully submitted, �� i Lavonn Cooper Recording Secretary 1-- � 1 �� CITY OF fRIDLEY APPEALS COMMISSIQN FIEETIP�G, SEPTEh16ER 1, 1987 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Betzold called the September 1, 1987, Appeals Corrrnission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: tqembers Present Menbers Absent Donald Qetzold, Alex Barna, Jerry Sherek, Kenneth Vos Diane Savage Otliers Present: Darrel Clark, City of Fridley Isabelle Jordal, 6133 IJoody Lane N.E. Gregory Mortenson, 6191 Kerry Lane David Harris, 470 Rice Creek Blvd. Janice Warren, 3530 Skycraft Drive, St. Anthony APPROVAL OF AUGUST 11 , 1987, APPEALS COt1t1ISSI0F! MIt1UTE5: MOT:OIl BY MR, BARNA� SECONDED BY MR, SHEREK� TO RPPROVE THE AUGUS: 11� 1987� APPEALS COl4MISSION MINUTES AS 47RITTEN, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTItlG AYE, CHAIRPERSON BET20LD D£CLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNRNId10USLY. 1. COIJTIIJUATIOtJ OF A VARTA��CE REOUEST. VAR #87- MOTION BY NR. BARNA, SECONDED BY DR. VOS� TD OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON BE2ZOLD DECLARED THE PUBLIC XEARING OPEN AT 7:32 P.M, Chairperson Betzold read the Administrative Staff Report: ADMIPlISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 6191 KERRY LANE VAR #87-29 A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREP1ENT: Section 205,07.3, D, 2a, requires a side yard of ten (10) feet between any living area and side property lines. 1 �i APPEALS COt7MISSIOP� PIEETIFJ6, SEPTEtdBER 1 1987 PAGE 2 Public purpose served 6y this requirement is to maintain a minimum of 20 feet between liviag areas in adjacent structures and 15 feet between garages and livi�g areas in adjacent structures to reduce exposure to conflagration of fire. It is also to allow for aesthetically pleasing open areas around residential structures. B. STATED NARDSNIP: "Because of existing layout of house, proposed location of addition is the only feasible location. In 1977 iahen we built our house we had no children. �Jow, with three growing children we feel the need for a faMily room, an all-purpose room for family activities. The addition of this room would fulfill these needs. "This location is necessary because of existing decks and swinming pool. Also, existing rooms (dining and living room) would not allow desired access to proposed family room." C. ADI4IIJISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: The petitioner would like to add living space on behind the existinq garage. The existing garage is approximately 19.7 feet from the home to the north. It is very important that we know exactly how far the north wall is from the existing north lot line because there is 6 ft. easement located along the north line. Therefore, the petitioner has been requested to provide a survey verifying that dimension. If the Appeals Commission acts on this variance request, the staff has no stipulations to recommend until a survey is available. Mr. Clark stated tfiis variance request was discussed at the last meeting. At that time, it was decided that the petitioner would have to readvertise because the measurements were different than what were anticipated--a side yard set6ack from 1� feet to 4.4, feet rather than from 10 ft. to 6 feet, because of the way the house and gara9e were located on the lot. Mr. Clark stated there was also a 6 ft, easement that ran along the Pro�erty line that was for drainage purposes only. The City Engineering Oepartment has gone out to the site, reviewed the drainage, and feel the drainage ease- ment was not necessary. So, that day the petitioner had petitioned to have the easement vacated. Even if the Appeals Commission approves the variance, the petitioner has to go to City Council to get a motion to allo�� a ter�oorary encroachment or an encroachment for the lenyth of time it will take for the vacation process. There should be no reason why the Council would not approve the vacation because the Engineering Department has reviewed it and a9reed with the vacation process. Mr. Clark stated the petitioner had brought in sor�e construction plans for the addition. Ir APPEALS COtM1ISSI0N MEETIf�G, SEPTEMBER 1, 1987 PAGE 3 �4r. Betzold stated he would like the petitioner to better explain his hardship. Mr. 1lortenson stated they do not have a family room at this time. They have a livi�g room, but they do not have a room for the TV, piano, and a place for the children to play and have friends over. It would be very nice to have a room for those types of activities. He stated he did not feel it would work out very well to have the addition anywhere else on the lot. Mr. Betzold stated o�e concern he had was overbuilding on the lot, and the Conmission does try to discourage that. Mr. P1ortenson stated they do have quite a few large trees in the back yard and the addition would not involve the taking down of the trees. They would still have a grassy area between the addition and the swimming pool and behind tlie swimming pool as there is now. Right now where the addition o-�ould go, they have a sandbox and a swingset and those will be moved farther back. Dr. Vos asked if t4r. t4ortenson had talked to his neighbor to the north about the addition. Mr. Mortenson stated, yes, he had talked to his neighbors. The neighbor to the north had no problem with the addition, and the neighbor to the south would not even see the addition because of so many trees. Mr. Sherel: asked how old the house was. Fdr. �dortenson stated he built the house about 10 years ago. Mr. Barna asked Mr. Clark what the percentage of lot coverage would be with tlie addition and the screened-in porch. Mr. Clark stated that the lot coverage with the addition would be 16.4%. This was not including the swimming pool. The allowable lot coverage was 25%. The petitioner was allowed by code to have 3,453 sq. ft. of building, and he would have 2,278 sq. ft. with the addition. Mr. Barna asked why the petitioner could not move the addition over 4 ft. to the south. Mr. Mortenson stated there was a half-bath back there with a wi�dow, and they did not want to have to remove that window. Plus, it would make them so much closer to the swimming pool, and it would make the back yard look more cluttered. The way the addition was proposed, there was a fairly decent space between the addition and the swimming pool. Mr. Barna stated that since the sideyard was already ecisting at 4.6 ft., was it existing non-conforming? APPEALS C019f4ISSI0Fa MEETIfJG, SEPTEMBER 1, 1487 PAfE 4 Mr. Clark stated that was correct; dowever, if the Appeals Commission altered the variance being requested to less than the 4.6 ft., then it would be proper for the Commission to act on the existing 4.6 ft. and then in a separate motion approve the variance the Commission wants to approve. Now- ever, if the Commission approves the 4.4 ft., then he felt that was encom- passing enough to include the exisiing sideyard setback. MOTZON BY MX. BARNR� SECONDED BY MR. SHEREK� TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE PUBLZC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:54 P.M. Mr. Sherek stated lie had a difficult time with the hardship in this case. 7he house was built by the petitioner, and there were no pre-existing condi- tions from the time the property was purchased that would have created a hardship. Ne stated the lot was very crowded. Because of the difficulty he was having with the hardship, he wou)d have to vote against the variance. Mr. Barna stated he felt basically the same way as Mr. Sherek. By moving the addition over and eliminating the bathroom window, the variance wouid be reduced to about 2.4 ft., but he still would have a problem iaith any variance. The lot was quite crowded now. The only hardship was a self-created hardship because the petitioner was the original owner of the house and had built the house. He stated he would have to vote against the variance also. Dr. Vos stated there was no objection from the neighbor to the north. By moving the addition over and still keepinq the same square footage, � variance would still be needed, so he would be in favor of the variance as requested. Mr. Betzold stated he was in agreement a�ith what had been said by f1r. Barna and Mr. Sherek. The yard was already crowded, the addition could be put on with less of a variance than what was being requested. He also felt the hardship was very weal:. The petitioners had made certain decisions alonp the way, they planned the house, the swimming pool, etc., and now needed a variance in order to build a family room when they should have planned ahead. He wouid vote aga4nst the variance. MOTIDN SY MR. BARNA� SECONDED BY MR. SHEREY,� TO HECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL DENIAL OF VARIANCE REQUEST� VAR N87-29, BY QtEGORY MORTENSON� PURSUANT TO 6HAPTER 205.07.03, D, 2a, OF THE FRIDLEY CZTY CODE TO ftEDUCE THE REQUIRED SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM ZO FEET TO 4.4 FEET TO ALLOW TXE CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONAL LZVING SPACE ON LOT 3, BLOCX 2, HEATHER HZLIS SECOND ADDITZON, THE SAME $EIN� 6291 KERRY LANE N,E.� FRZDLEY� MINNESOTR, 55432. UPON A VOICE VOTE, BETZOLD� SHEREK, AND BARNA VOTING AYE� VOS VOTING NAY� CHASRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CRRRIED BY R VOTE OF 3-Z. '� APPEALS C0�1MISSION MEETING, SEPTEPI6ER 1, 1987 PAGE 5 Z. MO2ION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY MR. SHEREK� TO APPROVE R VARIANCE FROM 5 FT. TO 4.6 FT. FOR THE EXZSTING GARAGE UNDEX VAR NB7-29. UPON A VOICE VOTE, RLL VOTING RYE, CHASRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CRRRZED UNANIMOUSLY. . MOTZON BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY MR. SNEREK� TO SEND VAR k87-29 DIRECTLY TO CITY COUNCIL, BYPASSING THE PLANNING COMMISSIDN� ZN ORDER FOR TNE CZTY COUNCIL TO HEAR THIS ITEM ON SEPTEMBER 14� 19B7. UPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTING RYE� CHA7RPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE A90SION CARRIED UNANiMOUSLY. COIJS I DERA7IO�J _zn nv rcoRri i c .inRnoi MOSION BY DR. VOS� SECONDED BY MR. BARNA� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CXAZRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED TXE PUBLIC HEARING OPi?N AT 8:02 P.M. Chairperson Betzold read the Administrative Staff Report: ADMIIJISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 6733 WOODY LAtlE �J.E. VAR �87-30 A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.07.03, D, 1, requires a minimum front yard depth of 35 feet:. Public purpose served by this requirement is to allow for off-street parkinq witfiout encroaching on the public right-of-��ay and also for aesthetic consideration to reduce the buildinq "line of sight" encroach- ment into the neighbor's front yard. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "The original building has a flat roof which was intended for a porch that was never built. We need the porch now as a permanent solution to the leaking roof which will rot out the garage ceiling joists if it is not fixed." C. ADPiIIJISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: The home was built in 1953 prior to City zoning setback restrictions. APPEALS CON�IISSIOF� MEETI�IG, SEPTEMBER 1, 19F37 PAfE 6 At the basement level of the original home, there is an attached garage with a flat roof. The petitioner would like now to build a porch on top of the garage at the same setbacks established when the original garage was built. Since there is an eighteen foot boulevard on Woody Lane, the structure is 43 feet back from the curb. If the variance is approved, the staff has no stipulations to suggest. Mr. Clark stated he had given the Cortmissioners a picture of the existing garage on ��hich the new porch would be built. There was also a letter from the adjoining neighbor to the east, Lois and Loren Adolphson, stating they did not object to P1s. Jordal's request. Ms. Jordal stated the garage roof was leaking badly and she needed to do something soon. She stated the porch would be a three-season porch. She stated she was also handicapped and she wanted some place where she could go to get fresh air and enjoy the outdoors without having to use any stairs. Mr. Betzold read the letter from the Adolpnson's which stated they felt the setback should be approved in order to allow Ms. Jordal to construct a three-season porch. They stated the garage roof was presently flat which was unattractive. They felt the porch would enhance the property and the neighborhood. They stated t4s. Jordal was also somewhat handicapped and the porch would certainly add to her enjoyment of the outdoors. MOTZON BY MR. BARNR� SECONDED BY MR. SHEREK, TO RECEZVE THE LETSER FROM LOZS AND LOREN ADOLPHSON. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTZNG AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION BY MR. SHEREK� SECONDED BY MR. BRRNA� SO CLOSE THE PUBLZC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRPERSON BESZOLD DECLARED TXE PUBLIC HEARING CIASED RT 8:15 P.M. Dr. Vos stated he felt the hardship was sufficient, and he would be in favor of granting the variance. Mr. Barna stated he agreed. There would be no change in the physical wall lines, just a three-season porch would be constructed on top of the existing garage. If anything, it would improve the property, and the hardship was a valid hardship. Mr. Sherek stated he agreed with Dr. Vos and Mr. Barna. Mr. Betzold also agreed. APPEALS CO(9P9ISSIO�J MEETIP�G, SEPTEMBER 1, 1987 PAGE 7 3 MOTION BY DR. VOS� SECONDED BY MR. SHEREK� TO APPROVE VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR N87-30� BY ZSRBELLE JORDAL� PURSUANT Tp CHAPTER 205.07.03� D� 1� OF THE FRIDL2iY CZTY CODE TO REDUCE THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 35 FEET TO 25 FEES TO RLLOW PXE CONSTRUCTZON OF A THREE-SEASON PORCH ON TOP OF THE EXZSTING C:ARRGE ON LOT 2, BLOCK 3� MOORE LRKE HILLS ADDITION� THE SAME BEZNG 6S3:i WOODY LANE N.E „ FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA, 55432. UPON A VOICE V02E� ALL VOTZNG AYE� CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED W�ANIMOUSLY. MOTION BY MR, BARNR� SECONDED BY DR. VOS� TD OPEN TNE PUBLIC HEARING. OpON A VOICE VOTE, RLL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE PUBLIC HERRING OPEN AT 8:18 P.M. Chairperson Betzold read the Administrative Staff Report: ADMIPJISTRATIUE STAFF REPORT 250 COMMERCE CIRCLE SOUTH VAR #87-32 A. PUQLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.18.03, D, 2, requires a side yard setback of not less than 20 feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide adequate open space areas around industrial structures for aesthetic and fire fightimg purposes. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "It is difficult if not impossible to secure a tenant of the caliber of Swift-Eckrich without providing this space:' C. ADMIIJISTRATIVE STAFF REVTEW: At the present time this is an open loading dock. The petitioner would like to enclose it. Planning Department staff has no objection to this piro posal, as long as it is stipulated that the variance would be only for this small enclosure and not the entire length of the building. The neou west wall must be fire-rated and the petitioner must screen any outside refuse containers. 0 � APPEALS COP1h1ISSI0t� MEETIP�G, SEPTEPiBER 1, 1987 PAGE 8 P1r. Clark stated it was his understanding that if the loading dock was allowed to be enclosed, that architecturally it was going to blend in with the building. Mr. Clark stated he had received a letter that day from the building owner to the west, Plidvrest Machine Tool Supply Co., stating he had no objection to the variance as requested by 11r. Harris. Mr. Harris stated the new tenant, Beatrice Foods, feels it would be impossible for them to utilize the building space if they cannot have an enclosed loading dock, so it was an economic fact from that standpoint. I4r. Harris stated the hardship for this particular lot was created after the fact. The original plat was approved by the City Council and Planning Commission with no raad there. About two days before he was to appear before the City Council for final approval of the plat, the City decided to put a road through there and needed an additional 25 ft. Because of that, it changed the orienta- tion of the lot, so the hardship was really created by the City in asking for the additional 25 ft. Ir', in fact, he had known about the road in the beginning and the City had come to him initially, he would probably have narrowed up the other lots along there to make the road possible. Mr. Harris stated he oriented the building because of the way the road came through there, so the building has frontage view both on the east and the south and somev+hat on the north. The back of the building which would face west was really not orientated to the public but was orientated to the build- ing next to it, Midwest �4achine Tool Supply So. The Midwest Machine Tool Supply building was set back to the west so there was parking lot between the back of his building and the front of Midwest tlachine Tool Supply building. As far as getting access for fire and any other equipment, there was plenty of room. t4r. Betzold read the letter from John Demos, President of Midwest Plachine Tool Supply Co., who stated he was in concurrence with the request by Mr. Harris for a covered dock area. MOTION BY MR. BARNA� SECONDED BY DR. VOS� TD RECEIVE THE LETTER FROM IfIDWEST MACHINE TOOL SUPPLY CO. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION BY MR. BARNR� SECONDED BY DR. VOS� TO CLOSE THE PUBLZC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHRIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE PUBLIC HERRING CLOSED AT 8:30 P.14. Dr. Vos stated he had no objection to the variance as requested. APPEALS COt�MI55I01� MEETII�G, SEPTE�1BER 1, 1987 PAGE 9 Mr. Barna stated he had no objection to the variance. The hardship as stated by the pei:itioner was created by the City in requesting additional nroherty for a roaci. This was a nice looking buiiding and well maintained. He was quite sure� that whatever covering was put over the existing loading dock would fit in wii:h the neighboring"structures and neighborhood. Mr. Sherek; and f1r. Betzold also agreed. MOTION BY MR. BARNA� SECONDED BY MR. SHEREK� TO RECOA1FfEND TO CITY COUNCIL APpROVAL OF VAR }i87-32� BY DAVID HARRIS� PURSURNT TO CHAPTER 205.28.03� D� 2, OF THE FR]"DLEY CITY CODE TO DECREASE TNE REQUIRED SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 20 FEET TO 5 FEET TO ALLOW THE ENCLOSURE OF AN EXZSTING IAADING DOCK ON IAT 7, BLOCK 2� F'ACO INDUSTRZAL PARK, THE SAME BE77JG 250 COM.4IERCE CIRCLE SOUTX N.E.� FRZDLEY� NfINNESOTA� 55432� WITH THE STIPULATZON TNAT THE PE1'ISIONER SCREEN ANY OUTSII)E REFUSE CONTAINERS. UPON A VO1"CE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BE:ZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIl40USLY. MOPION BY MR. SNEREK, SECONDED BY M.R, BARNA, TO SEND VAR #87-32 DIRECTLY TO CZTY COUNCZLi BYPASSZNG SHE PLhNl17NG COF1fdISSZON, IN QRDER FOR THE CISY CQUNCZL TO HEAR TE!IS ITEM ON SEPTEMBER 14� 19B7. UPON A VOI"CE VOTE� RLL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPF.RSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED Ull'ANZMOUSLY, AD,lOUR��I1ENT: MDTION BY ldR. BARNA, SECOtiDED BY MR. SHEREK, TO ADJOURN TNE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, AI,L VOTING AYE� CHRIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED TXE SEPTEMBER 1, 1987� APPEALS COd1M2SSION MEETZNG ADJOURNED AT 8:35 P.Af. Respectfully sub,m�itted, , �'C'-' � yn e Saba Rec rding Secr�etary