Loading...
PL 12/21/1988 - 7126:, .. � ,o- PLAPHING COMMISSION AGENDA �IEDPESDAY, DECEL�EB 21, 1988 7:30 P.M. Publ ic Planning C�uni.ssion � .. City of Fridley A G E N D A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 21,1988 7:30 P.M. LOCATION: COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER, 6085 - 7TH STREET N.E. CALL TO ORDER• ROLL CALL• APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: December 7, 1988 CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #88-16 BY JIM ,,, 1- 1L BURCH: Per Section 205.17.O1.C.9 of the Fridley City Code, to allow a repair garage on Lots 1- 5 and Lot 12, Block 2, Paco Industrial Park, the same being 7267 Commerce Circle West N.E. RECEIVE THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF ... YELLOW NOVEMBER 15, 1988 ' RECEIVE THE JOINT ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY COMMISSION/ENERGY ,,, gL� COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 22� 1988 RECEIVE THE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES ... SALMON OF DECEMBER 1. 1988 OTHER BUSINESS: ADJOURNMENT � � R 1 ♦ �' 1 � B CITY OF FRIDLEY PLAATNING COP�IIKISSION MEETING, DECEMBER 7, 1988 ----------------------------------------------------------------- CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Betzold called the December 7, 1988, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL C�1LL• : Members Present: Donald Betzold, Dave Kondrick, Dean Saba, Sue Sherek, Alex Bar�a, Paul Dahlberg Members Absent: None Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Kathlyn Castle, Planning Assistant Dale Edstrom, Northco Corp. Bruce Carlson, Northco Corp. Tom Gerster, KKE Architects Jim Benson, B,M, & B, Inc., Mpls. Dave Koski, Barton-Aschman Assoc. Ron Mattson, 7324 Symphony Street N.E. A1 Quam, 399 - 73rd Avenue N.E. Ron Killian, 7301 Concerto Curve N.E. APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 9, 1988; PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by. Mr. Rondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve the November 9, 1988, Planning Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1_ PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT. P.S. #88-02, NORTHCO CORPORATION BUSINESS PARK, BY FRIDLEY BUSINESS CENTER PARTNERSHIP COMPANY C�O NORTHCO CORPORATION: Being a replat of Tracts A and B, Registered Land Survey No. 6, and Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 78, qenerally located at 500 - 73rd Avenue N.E. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Barna, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. UPqN A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:32 P.M. Mr. Dahlberg stated that at this time he would excuse himself from the discussion and voting on this issue for reasons discussed � � PLANNIN(3 CO1rII�IIBBION MBETING. DBCEMHBR 7. 1988 PA(3E 2 + earlier with Chairperson Betzold. Ms. Castle stated the petitioner, Northco Corporation, was requesting consideration of a preliminary plat to replat Tracts A and B, Registered Land Survey No. 6, and Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 78. The property is located north of 71st Avenue, south of 73rd Avenue, and east of University Avenue. _ Ms. Castle stated the property is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial. To the north is single family and to the south is a public facilities district which contains the City of Fridley Public Works Garage and the City's recycling center. It also contains the regional recreation facilities, Columbia Arena and Locke Park. Ms. Castle stated the proposed plat would subdivide the property into il industrial lots, ranging from 2- 19 acres in size. The westerly portion of the plat is designed for the further development of buildings that would house light industrial uses such as office, warehouse, and manufacturing businesses. Ms. Castle stated the eastern portion of the plat is designed around the existing industrial businesses located on the site-- Carter Day, Rnox Lumber. Ms. Castle stated the plat's proposed lot lines do encroach upon some of the existing parking facilities; therefore, it will be necessary to obtain some joint driveway/parking easements from the developer: Ms. Castle stated access to the lots within the site will be gained from an interior S-shaped road off 73rd Avenue around to the University Avenue Service Drive. In addition, since the lots have double frontage, 73rd Avenue and 71st Avenue will provide access to some individual parcels. Currently, 71st Avenue does serve as the gateway to' the region's recreational facilities, but also serves as access to the City Garage and recycling center. Because of its quasi-industrial state, staff does not object to access off 71st Avenue; however, the developer must upgrade the road to the required industrial standards to serve the additional truck traffic. Currently, 71st Avenue is only a 7 ton road. Ms. Castle stated the Public Works Department has requested revisions from the developer regarding street/driveway intersection and�intersection right-of-way widths. The current layout of the proposed road could cause potential traffic problems with the existing� interior driveways. Ms. Castle stated that due to the site's natural characteristics, Siah St. Clair, City Naturalist, conducted a field survey with staff to determine tree preservation on the site. Mr. St. Clair did suggest that staff encourage preservation of trees 6 inches in � 4 ` PLANNIN�3 CO1rIIrII88ION MEETINa, DECEMBER 7, 1988 PAGE 3 diameter or larger on the site's west and south sides. The tree grove on the site's north side contains older, dying trees; therefore, trees with a diameter of 4 inches should be preserved in that area. Staff has suggested that landscaping is needed to screen the industrial development from the residential district to the north. �. Ms. Castle stated this proposal is consistent with the City's Cbmprehensive Land Use Plan. The development will increase the economic wellbeing of the community, while providing an attractive physical environment. The division of land into smaller parcels should attract less intense industrial uses which are more compatible with the residential community than heavy industrial uses. Ms. Castle stated staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following stipulations: 1. A development agreement be executed between the petitioner and the City Council which includes, but is not limited to: A. Design criteria B. Landscape maintenance C. Tree preservation D. Street and utility improvements 2. A storm drainage plan which either encompasses a comprehensive drainage plan or individual drainage plans for each lot shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The developer shall petition the City to construct and improve the necessary roadways and utilities in order to provide the adequate infrastructure to support the development. 4. 5. 6. Access from 73rd Avenue shall be limited to one driveway. Access from 71st Avenue shall be limited to four driveways. The necessary joint driveway/parking easements shall be executed for Lots 5, 6 and 7 and Lots 7 and 8, Block 2. 7. A revised preliminary plat providing adequate right-of-way at the intersections shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review prior to preliminary plat review before .� the City Council. 8. The developer shall submit a proposed plan for driveway access at the curve of the proposed street for Public Works Department review and approval prior to preliminary plat review before the City Council. Mr. Betzold asked if anyone knew what the traffic impact would be ;� PLANNIN(3 CO1rII+IIBBION MEETIN�3, DSCEMHSR 7, 1988 PAGE 4 in this area. Ms. Castle stated Northco has hired a consultant to do a traffic study, and maybe that person could address that issue. Ms. Dacy stated it was staff's understanding that when Target eXpands, that expansion will trigger an improvement project on 73rd Ai�enue N.E. The way the traffic plan and street plan are laid out, there is a good disbursal of access points into and out of the site. So, as the development is designed, there should be good separation b.etween truck traffic and the single family area to the north. Mr. Kondrick asked how they could discourage traffic leaving the property and traveling south along the University Avenue Service Drive past Columbia Arena to the 69th Avenue/University Avenue intersection. He stated that intersection is bad enough now without additional traffic. He was not so much concerned about car traffic as he was about truck traffic. Mr. Saba asked what kind of truck traffic was anticipated as far as volume and size. Mr. Bruce Carlson, Northco Corporation, stated he was one of the members of the Northco petition. He stated they do not have a formal traffic study at this time, but some information has been put together by their traffic consultant, Barton-Aschman Associates. Mr. Carlson introduced Tom Gerster, I�E Architects, and Dave Koski, a member of the Barton-Aschman Associates firm involved in traffic and access studies all over the metropolitan area, and Jim Benson who was involved with marketing the project. Mr. Carlson stated Northco is a Twin City based development, property management, and investment company. They specialize in retail office in retail office and office/warehouse type projects. They are not a mega developer, but more of a middle of the market developer, and they currently operate about 26 different real estate projects around the Twin Cities area. Nine of these projects are office/warehouse type projects. They have a fairly significant background in business park type development, primarily due�to his involvement in an industrial park development in the Plymouth area. Their basic business approach is to try to be a cooperative citizen in the communities in which they do business. Mr. Carlson stated about one year ago in October, they, acquired the Carter Day property. After they acquired the Carter Day facility, they became interested in the Chicago/Northwestern property between Carter Day and University Avenue, primarily because of their industrial and business park background, and it looked like a PLANNINQ CO1rIIiIBBION MEETING. DECEMHER 7. 1988 PAGE 5 logical extension of what they were doing in this area. Mr. Carlson stated they are now at the Planning Commission to propose a plat which they intend to become a master plan business park, and they will impose some architectural guidelines on how the buildings would be developed. They hope the City will agree with tbe landscaping and the saving of trees which is one the natural anenities on this site. Mr. Carlson stated they think the use they are proposing for the property is the lowest traffic generator that is likely to occur on this property, as compared to Bome other types of commercial uses. Mr. Carlson stated they intend to build office, office/warehouse, showroom, light manufacturing type uses on the property. They will probably sell some and will probably build for lease on some of the land. They are not asking for any rezoning or conditional use permits; and, at this point, do not anticipate they will need any in the future. Mr. Carlson stated they had a neighborhood meeting on Novemer 28, and some of the neighbors who were at that meeting were in attendance at the Planning Commission meeting. He stated they presented their proposal to the neighbors and listened to the concerns expressed by the neighbors. Since then, they have been working with City staff to make sure they have a development that is compatible with the wishes of the City of Fridley and also one that will be successful for them. Mr. Carlson stated one of the concerns expressed by the neighbors was the visibility from the homes to the property. There did not seem to be a lot of concern about traffic. He stated they tried to demonstrate to the neighbors that this was a compatible and good use for the property. They felt their overall plan did address all the concerns of both the City and the neighbors. Mr. Carlson stated he would like Mr. Gerster to make the architectural and layout presentation. Mr. Gerster stated they have been working for a number of months with Northco Corporation, and more recently with City staff, to develop a master plan business park that will be a benefit to the City of Fridley and to Northco. He showed an aerial photo showing the site and its location in the City, and he showed a schematic of the actual engineered preliminary plat drawing. Mr. Gerster stated there are a couple objectives they are trying to achieve with this project: 1. They have tried to master plan a business park within the x PLANNINa COMMI88ION 1KESTIN(;. DTCEMBBR 7. 1988 PA(3E 6 framework of the M-2, industrial zoning, to attract less intense industrial uses which are more compatible with the single family area to the north. 2. They will save as many of the existing trees on the site as possible, because the trees are one of the prime natural amenities of the site. Mr. Gerster stated they feel they can be more compatible with the existing neighborhood by dividing the plat into multiple smaller parcels trying to go with more of a 2 acre size. They will bring in smaller buildings which in scale, from a height standpoint, will be more in the range of the neighboring residential homes. Mr. Gerster stated they have also voluntarily submitted architectural quidelines to help control the quality of materials in the appearance of the buildings as they are seen from the adjacent roadways and the adjacent residential area. Mr. Gerster stated one of the things the smaller lots require of a development like this is the use of an internal roadway to gain access to each of the lots. This creates frontage for all the lots on at least one public street. Mr. Gerster stated they are maintaining minimum setbacks through the site. At this time, they will not be requesting any variances. They are also providing a 15 foot bikeway trail easement. Mr. Gerster stated some of the neighbors have expressed concern about visibility into the site, and they would like to see additional screening. He stated they do feel landscaping is very important to the overall competition of the business park; however, they cannot entirely screen the buildings because visibility is very important from surrounding roadways. They would use landscaping, undulating terrain, or rolling berms to help soften the appearance of the buildings, but they could not entirely block the buildings. Mr. Betzold asked what Northco envisioned for signage--one large sign for the whole business park or individual signs? Mr. Gerster stated they do plan to have a sign monument of decorative masonry materials that would be located along University Avenue, which would give indication of the entrance to the busi.ness park along the new road which would be the major access into the site. Mr. Saba asked about lighting. Mr. Gerster stated lighting would typically be the shoebox type head with a downcast light which shines down and not out. They � � 0 PLANNING CO��II+iI88ION MSBTIN�. DLCEMB�R 7. 1988 - PAGE 7 have been using the shorter poles (25-35 ft.), especially for the smaller buildings and smaller parking areas. Mr. Barna asked what kind of businesses would probably go in on this site. M�. Jim Benson stated Fridley has been able to attract a lot of very small high technical type companies because of the medical facilities in the City. A number of these sites would be designed for an R& D type facility, light manufacturing, light industrial, etc., and which would be low profile buildings. Mr. Koski stated they have prepared a traffic generation report of the business park. They anticipate the peak traffic hours to be 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. They feel the traffic generated from this proposal will be almost 10% of what would be generated by a development such as that proposed by Cub Foods a few years ago. Mr. Koski stated the report indicated close to 300 vehicles in and out of the site during the P.M. peak hours and about 1,300 vehicles in and out of the site during the day. Of the total traffic into and out of the site, they expect about 5� and a maximum of 8� will be trucks of all types. They have reviewed the traffic already at the key intersection at 73rd Avenue/University Avenue and looked at the amount of traffic that might come through that intersection oriented to this new project. That amount of traffic does not have any significant impact on the traffic operations or safety of that intersection. They would expect about 40� of the traffic entering and leaving the site will come from the north, 40� will come from the south on University Avenue, and the remaining 20� will come from the east on 73rd Avenue. Mr. Roski stated that in regard to the question about traffic going to the intersection at 69th Avenue/University Avenue, he would think that with almost two-thirds of the traffic oriented to the northern area and one-third of the traffic oriented to the 71st Avenue/University Avenue intersection. He stated they do not expect a great deal of traffic on the frontage road to 69th Avenue. That road and that intersection are not conducive to accommodating large trucks. Overall, they do not see any impact to traffic operations or to the safety in the area of traffic generated by the development. They also do not think any of this traffic will end up in the residential area at all, simply by virtue of the design of 73rd Avenue and the deadend nature of 71st Avenue. Mr. Saba asked how much truck traffic was normally done between 12:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. Mr. Koski stated the primary trucking traffic into warehousing sites usually occurs in the morning hours between 6:00 a.m. to pLANNING COMMI68ION M$BTINd D$C$MBER 7 1988 - PAGE 10 Mr. Barna stated he also would must rather see smaller broken up planned development than a large development. It certainly softened the impact on the neighborhood. M�. Betzold ` stated he would like to commend Northco on the time spent with the neighbors in soliciting their input before appearing before the Planning Commission. He stated this certainly gives the City an indication of a quality development. The Planning Commission and the City certainly appreciated Northco's efforts. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Barna, to recommend to City Council approval of preliminary plat, P.S. #88-02. Northco Business Park, by Fridley Business Center Partnership c/o Northco Corporation: Being a replat of Tracts A and B, Registered Land Survey No. 6, and Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 78, generally located at 500 - 73rd Avenue N.E., with the following stipulations: 1. A development agreement be executed between the petitioner and the City Council which includes, but is not limited to: A. Design criteria B. Landscape maintenance C. Tree preservation D. Street and utility improvements 2. A storm drainage plan which either encompasses a comprehensive drainage plan or individual drainage plans for each lot shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. The developer shall petition the City to the necessary roadways and utilities in adequate infrastructure to support the 4. 5. 6. construct and improve order to provide the development. Access from 73rd Avenue shall be limited to one driveway. Access from 71st Avenue shall be limited to four driveways. The necessary joint driveway/parking easements shall be executed for Lots 5, 6 and 7 and Lots 7 and 8, Block 2. 7. A revised preliminary plat providing adequate right-of-way at the intersections shall be submitted to the Public Works " Department for review prior to preliminary plat review before the City Council. 8. The developer shall submit a proposed plan for driveway access at the curve of the proposed street for Public Works Department review and approval prior to preliminary plat review before the City Council. PLANNING COMMIBBION MEBTING. D$CEMBER 7. 1988 PAGE 11 Mr. Betzold stated this item would go to City Council on December 19, 1988. 2. REVIEW 1989 WORKPLAN: Ms. Dacy stated that in addition to the 11 items established for consideration by the Planning Commission in April 1987, staff is recommending to add two more items: 1. The Urban Design Standard Book 2. Revision of the Subdivision Ordinance Ms. Dacy stated that based on City Council action, a third item would be a review of Light Rail Transit (LRT) routes and proposed LRT stations. City Council will be discussing this on Monday night, December 12. Mr. Dahlberg stated that the article in the December 7th Fridley Focus on Light Rail Transit routes stated that, "According to the Comprehensive Plan, the northeast corridor system including a selection between University and Central routes should be selected by the end of December. A feasibility and implementation plan would then be defined by mid-June." Mr. Dahlberg stated, personally, he felt there was a need for the Planning Commission to become involved rather quickly. He stated he has already discussed this with Mr. Robertson, and he thought, to date, the decision making process has not involved any of the planning staff in any of the communities that will be affected by this corridor selection. He felt it was important to have a lot of involvement in what this impact is going to be on the City of Fridley. Mr. Dahlberg stasted he was also under the impression that there was a third corridor under consideration, the existing Burlington Northern Rail, but he had not seen any information about that in recent publications. Mr. Dahlberg stated the Anoka County Committee and representatives of the Hennepin County Authority and BRW are having a public meeting on December 12, 1988, in the Council Chambers at Columbia Heights City Hall. That meeting is primarily for the City of Columbia Heights, but he would hope either the City of Fridley could do something similar to that or participate in that meeting. Mr. Dahlberg stated he was specifically concerned that the representation from Fridley has primarily been from an engineering and technical standpoint and not from a planning standpoint, and he was a little afraid of what is going to happen. PLANNINa COMMIBBION MEBTINd, DECEMHER 7. 1988 PAGE 12 Mr. Saba stated he agreed with Mr. Dahlberg. Mr. Dahlberg asked if there was a way the Planning Commission could express in the form of some kind of objection through the City Council to the Anoka County Rail Authority that they feel that a decision cannot be made as quickly as the Rail Authority would like, and that the City of Fridley would like the decision delayed until the City has had an opportunity to do some planning and some ftrrther investigation on the impact to the City of Fridley, and be able to pass on a recommendation from the City to the Rail Authority. Ms. Dacy stated she would pass on the concerns expressed by the Commission to Mr. Jock Robertson so these comments could be incorporated into a memo to the City Council for their Monday meeting. MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Mr. Saba, that the City Planning Staff, in conjunction with the Planning Commission, be actively involved in the analysis and selection of the proposed LRT corridor through the City of Fridley. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Dahlberg stated he would like to ask staff to look at and at least do some preliminary investigation into the possibility of creating a design review committee, not as a separate entity of the Planning Commission, but as a sub-committee of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission functions as a body that reviews projects in order to save the City Council time. Similarly, the design review committee might save the Planning Commission some time by reviewing projects before the meeting. Ms. Castle stated part of the Urban Design Standards includes a design review that would be done by staff so she did not know how that would affect Mr. Dahlberq's suggestion. Ms. Sherek stated she liked the idea of design review, but it probably would be a duplicate of what staff already does. Maybe what the Planning Commission should do is just ask staff not to bring any packages to the Planning Commission unless the petitioner is completely prepared and everything is complete--that the Pla�ning Commission will not accept any incomplete packages. MOTION by Mr. Rondrick, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to approve the workplan as amended: 1. Urban Design Standards Notebook 2. Inventory vacant land 3. Develop Solid Waste Policy 4. Consider Systematic Code Enforcement ! PLANNINa CO1�II88ION MEETING. DECEMBER 7. 1988 PAGE 13 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Revise various Zoning Ordinances to improve code enforcement (trash enclosures, parking, and home occupation) Update Comprehensive Plan Revise Subdivision Ordinance Review of Light Rail Transit routes and proposed LRT stations Consideration of Planning Commission Design Review Committee UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. STATUS OF DECEMBER 21, 1988, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: Ms. Dacy stated there was one application for the December 21 Planning Commission meeting, and that was for a special use permit at 7267 Commerce Circle West N.E. by Pioneer Concepts in order to vacate the building in which they are currently located. 9, RECEIVE OCTOBER 18, 1988. JOINT ENVIRONMENTAL 4UALITY COMMISSION/ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES:_ MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the October 18, 1988, Joint Environmental Quality Commission/Energy Commission minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5, RECEIVE NOVEMBER 7. 1988, PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to receive the November 7, 1988, Parks & Recreation Commission minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. RECEIVE NOVEMBER 10, 1988, HaUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINLTTES • MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to receive the November 10, 1988, Housing & Redevelopment Authority minutes. UPON �, VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to adjourn the meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Betzold declared the PLANNING COl�I86ION MBBTINa, D$CBMB$R 7. 1988 PAGB 14 December 7, 1988, Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 9:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, , i� � y Saba Rec rding Secretary a 1 e � � � STAFF REPORT � APPEALS DATE ��� �F PLANWNG COMMISSION DATE : vecember 21, � 988 FRIDLEY CITY COIAVCIL DATE Au�R gc/an REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCATION SITE DATA SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONING ADJACENT LAND USES E� ZONWG UTIUTIES PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSNE PLAN COMPATIBILfI'Y WITH ADJACENT USES F� ZONqVG ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION SP 4�88-16 Jim Burcb, Pioneer Concepts To allow a repair garage in an M-1 district. 7267 Co�erce Circle West N.E. 6.5 acres M-1, Light Industrial N, M-I, M-2, C-2; S, M-1; E, C-2; W, M-1 Available- should correspond with utilities, not park dedication. Yes Yes Approval. � � lA Staff Report SP #88-16 Page 2 REQUEST The petitioner, Jim Burch, of Pioneer Concepts, is requesting approval of a special use permit to allow a repair garage at 7267 Commerce Circle West NE. Repair qarages are permitted as a special use in the M-1, Light Industrial District. In evaluating this request, the City should determine the use's suitability by analyzing the nature of the land the use is to be located on, the nature of the adjacent land and buildings, the use's traffic impact and other factors as deemed necessary. Pioneer Concepts is an automotive body shop which specializes in automotive accessory installation and decorative painting. ANALYSIS Background Pioneer Concepts is currently operating in a multi-tenant building located at 7401 Central Avenue N.E. which is located in a C-1, Local Business District. In this district, repair ga'rages are not permitted by right or by special use. Despite this, Mr. Burch has been operating his business at this location for a period of 5 years. It was not until he expanded his business to include decorative painting that the City became aware that this use was illegal at this location. Staff notified Mr. Burch in October that he must cease operation. Staff has been working with him to find an alternate location. Site The applicant is proposing to relocate to a multi-tenant industrial building at 7267 Commerce Circle West. The building currently contains 18 tenants whose uses include office, warehouse and manufacturing. The intensity of these uses range from 100% office to 90� manufacturing. The manufacturing uses include print shops, machine shops, fabrication and electronic parts processing. Staff has analyzed the parking supply and has determined that adequate parking is available for this use. The uses in this building require 267 parking stalls to be available, however, 206 spaces are provided on site. To the south of the site is a parking lot which contains 155 spaces that is used for overflow parking. This brings the total number of parking spaces provided to 361 which means there is a surplus of 46 spaces available. The Code requires 9 spaces be available for this business, however, Mr. Burch stated that no more than 5 spaces would be used at one time. Staff Report SP #88-16 Page 3 Business IB As stated earlier, Pioneer Concepts specializes in automotive accessory installation and decorative painting. The petitioner proposes to lease a 3,500 square foot bay on the building's west side. Of the 3,500 square feet, 15� (580 square feet) will be used for office space and 85� (2,920 square feet) for manufacturing/warehouse space. Attached is a floor plan which clarifies the how the bay is to be used. TMe petitioner has stated that there will be no work on cars outside or storage of cars outside. Cars which are waiting to be worked on will be stored inside the bay. Because the business does include automotive decorative painting, the petitioner will be required to comply to the City's Fire code. The Fire Chief has recommended construction of a fully enclosed paint booth which is self ventilated, installation of specialized lighting and installation of intake and exhaust particle filters. Ventilation will occur through the rear of this structure. The petitioner expects the paint booth to be in operation around two hours per day. RECONIlKENDATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Staff recommends approval of special use permit, SP 88-16, by Jim Burch to allow a repair garage at 7267 Commerce Circle West NE with the following stipulations: 1. Outside storage of cars is prohibited. 2. The tenant bay be modified to meet the City�s fire code requirements. 3. Repair work shall be conducted within the building. No outdoor repair activity is permitted. a 1C A T T A C H M E N T S ITEM 1: SP 4�88-16, BY JIM BURCH PAGE: 1D - APPLICATION IE - PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 1F - MAILING LIST 1G - LOCATION MAP 1H - ZONING MAP lI - SITE PLAN 1J - FLOOR PLAN IK - LETTER TO PLANNING COMM. FROM JIM BURCH 1L - LETTER, PG. 2 � CITY OF FRIDLEY 8431 UNIVERSITY AYE. N.E. � FRIDLEY, MN 6643Z i81_2)i71-8480 ' I SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP ��S" I� .. e� i:, . .;.. . , k, , . : se�cr�, osE �raT �. �\ - tJ ��r � `'30 9��� � _ : � , . . :; , . . ww�� ' '. . '. Y..� '�. • • ' `.'�� �_ � �''F PLARINa�C'a Qi�$�SSIi7N �'S . - , . _ � � k S , �� �•�-���� �r �J�i yry� 4�� _ i_� . � . . . ' .. _ ' � � _ _ _. . PR��'E�,�TY 1NFQRMATIQN . ��`�x: � ` ; � � 3t . „_ . ;. ,r , , . . ,. , .. , . � , � T � �.:� b; ��s�r �s �v ��� �!l��. l�S� / � i�r�jjf ' `� � ' , _ .. ° r•�. ��.s�r�: - � - � - � � �r � �. � � ; ., . � .. _ �.� � ; Z- �er�aT�t � �;�. � rdi ��..�� �,�,���, -_ . . .�.. :k�; � � , . , ,. q.:_r r �.�. . - � ,� � � ,�'; PR +FSII�!' �'1�Q�INr" �..:_, � _ � je��AGE�` , , ,, r; s",; ,� .;_:r '` =_ _ s�cr�t osE,�tr�rr s� ��n �x: �t�Pia�2 �A�� t . . � .S« � .:� :,;; �' . �_ • '� ' �.•-: .>j , s � ., .i •- � /.Id�rO i �lf/ .. fi . p � i �?'��lJ �is��,�dil�/'� � � `:_ �, .�, u-�s� ���._ ryz - , � _ - � _ -- SDC'r'ZON � ZiiE 4)�: * * * �t * * * * * * ,t * * * * * # * * * # * * * * ,r * * * * * �t �r * * * * * * * * * ,�:.:-._. - PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Planning Commission at the CONIlKUNITY EDIICATION CENTER, 6085 - 7TH STREET N.E. on Wednesday, December 21, 1988 at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP #88- 16, by Jim Burch, per Section 205.17.O1.C.9 of the Fridley City Code, to allow a repair garage on Lots 1- 5 and Lot 12, Block 2, Paco Industrial Park, the same being 7267 Commerce Circle West N.E. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. DONALD BETZOLD CHAIRMAN PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: December 7, 1988 December 14, 1988 t$ � IF Planning December 2. 1988 SP �88-16 Jim Burch Karl Schurr 7818 Alden Way N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Frito-Lay Inc. 7180 Commerce Circle West N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Frito-Lay Inc. 2720 Ste�ons Freeway Dallas, TX 75200 WWH Properties 7220 Commerce Circle West N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 WWH Properties 901 Winter N.E. Minneapolis, MN 55413 Royal Crown Beverage 7230 Commerce Circle West N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Pride Machine Inc. 7220 Commerce Circle West N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley Limited Partnership 530 Parkland Place Minneapolis, MN 55413 Paco Office Building 7260 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley Limited Partnership 7280 Commerce Circle East N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Eridley Limited Partnership 7281 Commerce Circle West N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Prudential Insurance Co. 7151 Commerce Circle West N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Council MAILING LIST Prudential Insurance Co. 33 South 6th Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 Prudential Insurance Company 251 Commerce Circle South N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Resident 261 Commerce Circle South N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Scandinavian Health Spa 7200 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Winfield Development 5780 Lincoln Drive Edina, MN 55435 Resident 7110 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Self Serve Car Wash 7320 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Robert Miller 3334 Fairmont North Minneapolis, MN 55429 Hanna Car Wash 7300 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Hanna Franchise 2000 Hanna Drive Milwaukie, OE 97200 Minco Products 7300 Commerce Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Pioneer Auto Trim 1621 Gettysburg Avenue N. Golden Valley, MN 55427 Planning Comm. Chair City Council Members . ,�TL, � � � �d �.� o J 3 � �V ` W V � _ W . ` �a ' =. b � SP 4�88-16 Jim Burch I I �_ l � .. ,.�s� � * ` ._' � - '" ' I --- �� � - �--- �1J.N -` M k,, � � O N�� • � _ �� . � /fS.OG e : � l � � ..�k _- � -� __ __ � > w � ��-� ,�� ,, � — � ,�o • } 4 � 3 2 '� / h ��� � � (oolA) ; � � ► -0 � e �b � Q ��1 �1 �� ' --_ ��4 � � . 0 0 1 A ^ h-f:�„ _ 72L0 � }. �,�� � na i. •� •�r�� � h F— Q Q' � � .�'.o�•svi� � � ..''ss•�vvrt' � ,e� Z � V � r� . ,ai� . ; ; � (n � p � � � R� � $ �, ! ' � � I u� . � 7261 �►� 728D M� , r. �: a w 5 2+a /2 ,�O M ` : � � � � ;. � Z �"1 � �O : W. � � ,; D •��� �_ _',�ti , �.. � � J M � �ti.oe � ' i, ,Q,Q�T. i�r/.1� �' �� /� � . . .i ..� V � iv�tJ•3i � '%al ------ �>.f.q/ s G.� I �• . ' � � �:- � ;---_ �z, ; � , � ti,S; (ooao) � b , 3 ��� � ; C ,V ffi ��� � C� y I v� a ' P � 6 ��� �/ � 7 Z�� �� � o j � �l ' , . ; ` �D o ' ,�• �s,ss`� 3 � °� r, {� � 0 h � �n p 8 �... �u s: r� o' . w j � � S�Jfiilf S81 f.�.Glf , Ei�a � , � v �1 �I�QI � M i4.•i a� �I5 /45 �� .}5 V� 4 � 3 V� 'V D�i0.� p ' s'1 f ` � �007/) _ �; �y� ai Q i e�„ 3� l W �• � �, o �r � ~ � � d1l.lf � `�t VjQ�^ Q % °� ' B 9 /0 C � � -�viaE. � � � � I � . � � `� i c ��' 4'�1 Z 0 22t, ?.�3-?�5 U � o►: � � � Q' . a � � �--, � 5 ,�9 , �5� �" -� . , m� � Z� P ; �;s , � " - �'. v ''`i�' Q ;�.fl� ' ------ � � , � , ���RCE CIRCLE sSQ. ;�'�� ;� � ,�4,'-,< . ' � � ����: � F � �► ,� • � I (�• � . ' �: ' - ' + � r �- i' � � �$'�• ��� ; ; �� � t �s _ � �► �SO r�a+' � 4' ,i--I . 1 � � �� 6 � � i -. � (�� - ( (B) / » .� � 9 1 7 �, � �n °� � �� \ k�� M4, ,�.1/.�. SL6: ' G. �.��� � T ;� * � � r? p� d.e��,v ��L.. aGd� � �,�r� 7�� � �- s� � � � L L _/ � "" ts. i i : �• ---. . ��¢6_.1 1 _ 4� .� ; �' . �� : ; ; , , . �� : �_ .� ��: ; ,� ,� 8 � r- ► � � a� � LOCATI�N MA P 1G � SP 4�88-16 Jim Burch lI C7 Z 0 � F— ¢ W W J U U W � w � O U Z 0 m � � J � U U W � � O U �Z COMMERCE CIRCLE EAST NE Z ( ^_.��_ ��� � i �► � T�iiTf TI-I- _''-- - _ W ' I �— a I-1 � ! ' . If iili li�illllll t a I— � � " .i i. � r- �� - � �i� i j � i � - � , ^ o' _ � ; o � �_.� ; �- . � _ _ _ _ ' ;— °� = o 0 0 ° _ i— ° _ ° �-- . � �--- o; ,_ ; � �" � �� . 0 0 .o N a �° w � � �� �Z? o� tZ �� a �� — -� �- �-- -� - -- � �� � �_� _ ! :�:_{ --.., �:-: !.---- _.� � _�, �,—�-- ; - z �_ � ` � � ° ,° _ I � � � _1 0 o a �j , _ � i— c. 'J o — I C— • j_ I � � LLl: �i i s is ii ,o !,- I c d co oc � Z� � i � W �-.... 7 -- -' � ' • -._" . , _ Z� ' � °t •- �' � '�' °1 0 .._ _� i � � i- � ; =� i ~ !, — __ ..._�- - __ -- • •-•- + -� J�= �1 �� I , � oo ao 00 . oo -- � :_'�_�_G_i_11�L!_�1J_I_f..!.._�_i_!..I_�_�_Il�_.I !_;_I_! �_;_� ;=' ----;� ,---� �`- - - ------ --- -----j__l _i COMMERCE CIRCLE WEST NE i � a 0 0 — � Z O y 6 Q og Y � Q �_ 00 _? �w �� ¢ 0 ° e __ cc S ITE PLA N e� cu�a cuas vas /�ias+t. nnwuor�. SP �88-16 Jim Burch �J � � � � tOfO � i� `_ � J � . �c - 3t0 0/1i4 -� . = ..t'w �.'� . , _.^ s �1 �1�1Q DI A AI PIONEER ��..���-.� r r ��a � r�� O I B T I N C T I V 8 B T V L 8 B 1 N M O T 1 O N December 9, 1988 Planning Commission City of Fridley Fridley, Minnesota We have applied for a Special Use Permit for location of our business at 7267 Commerce Circle West N. E. in Fridley. We are desiring to relocate our automobile customizing shop within the city limits. Our location at present is not zoned for our type of establishment. Our present location is 7401 Central Ave- nue �. E., Fridley. We have been doing business in the Fridley area at the Central Avenue address for nearly five years. During that time, we have expanded owc operation to include decorative pa.inting on trucks. Our pri.mary customer is Waldoch Crafts, Inc. , a van and spv�t truck converter in Forest Lake. Shortly af'ter beginning this poricion of our business, the Fridley Fire Department had us up- grade the facility to meet the city f•xre code. This involved the construction of a large paint booth, paint room, special lighting, and water sprinkler system. We were nearly finished with the upgrading when we were informed we could not perform this type of work at this loc ation. We have gone a tremendous expgn�e to upgrade this facility. Very little of it is going to be salvagable. As a result, the city allowed a time frame to the end of 1g88 to move. We cancelled our leases and arranged to sign annew lease at the Commerce Circle location. In the meantime, the city offices had approved the location. Nothing was said of the Special Use Permita Aiter cancelling the leasea, and after our former tennant had arranged for new leasors at the end of the year, we were told about the Special Use Permit, and that the earliest approval would come in the month of January, 1989. As you can see, my situation is-precariouso I could now stand to be out of a plac� of business for a minimum of one month, and at least two months with no business. I would not survive. I have looked at many options and have decid�d my least risk would be to try and have permit approved. Despite the above I i have found the city people to be very pleasant and understanding � and would like to stay in Fridley, especially since I know to . fire requirements, etc. lg PIONEER ��..��.�.��. r r ��i � ��� i D 1 B T 1 N C T 1 V B H T Y L 8 B I N M O T 1 O N PLANNING COMMISSION C ITY OF FRID?�EY page two To that end, I am furnishing to you a drawing of the planned layout of the Commerce Cirle warehouseo A].so, to give you some indication of what we do, some pictures of our work. Also enclosed, is a fact sheet of the paint product we use. �e pt,� to the use of iscocyantes in the paint o�a most automotive paints, we are using a special formula by Sikkens called Autonova which uses much safer paint additives. This results ia a higher cost, but has less enviormental impact. The pai.nt booth, once built� will be a fully enclosed, self- ventilated, area with explosion proof lighting and intake and exhaust particle.filters. It will be ventilated out the rear of the structure. We have satisfied the owners and their insurance carriers with our proceedure. We will also install water sprinklers. Please bear in mind that this is not a body shop. At most, the paint booth will be in operation two hours per day when we have work for it. Otherwise, our shop is used for ins-�allation of sunroofs, running bosr�ds, and ottaer accessories. Also, we are a clean operation, we would not be an eyesore to the areao �Th�ky�nu_:�s��s�a�rr°��me to satisfy you so as _. to gaa.n this. I hope I will be able to the Special Use Permit. ames (Jim) Do Burch Owner Pioneer Conce�b�s 1621 �ettysburg Ave. No. Golden Valley, Nuv 55�27 Phome 593-0827 786-8568 a 1L � • + Y Clil � 1'n�lli'r•1 APPEAI.S CCY�MISSION, I�III�ISgt 15, 1988 CAIZ, � ORDER : Chairperson Barna called the Nav��er 15, 1988, Appeals Ca�ussiori meeting to order at 7;30 p.m. iiULL CALZ, : � r�rs Present: Alex Barna, Diane Savage, Ke.ruieth Vos, Jerry Sherek, Larry Kuechle Mesribers Absent: None Others Present: Darrel Clark, Chief Building Official Ernie Otto, Stylmark Donn Mooty, Stylmark APPROVAL OF 0(."I'OBER 11, 1988, APPEI�L,S CC%TTMISSICN MEETING: MOTIOI� by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Sherek, to approve the Oct�r 11, 1988, Appeals Cam-ussion meeting to approve the October 11, 1988, Appeals Ccmnission meeting minutes approved as written. UPOti A VOICE VC'II'E, ALL VO�PING AYE, CHAIRPII2�SON BAi2NA DDCLAFtID THE MOTIO'� CARpIID UNF�.N IA'IOL' SLY . COt�'SIDERhTIOI� OF A VARIANCE RF,QUEST, VAR #88-26, BY DOI�IIV M0C7TY: Pursuant to Section 205.17.03.D, 4, a), of the Fridley City Code to reduce the front yan3 setback fran a street rightrof-way abutting a residential district fran 100 feet to 47.9 feet to allvw the oonstruction of an addition to the exist- ing building on Lots 2-10, Block 6, Rioe Creek Plaza, South Addition, the same being 6536 Main Street N.E. (Stylmark). MCYI'ION by Mr. Kuechle, seo�nded by Ms. Savage, to cypen the public heari.ng. UPON A WICE VdI'E, AI,L VOTING AYE, CHP,IRPII�.SON BARI� DDCL�F2ID THE P'USLIC HEARING OP�1 AT 7:06 P.M. Chairperson Barna read the Ac�ninistrative Staff Report: ADMIlJISTRFITIVE STAFF' REPORT 6536 Main Street N.E. VAR #88-26 :, •• �- a� � �• r a i� Section 205.17.03.D, (4) ,(a) , requires any building in an i.r�dustrial district abutting a residential district t.� be no closer than 100 feet to a street right-of-way Line. � � APPg1IS OCi�'iISSICN I�TaIG, N(7VII�II2 15, 1988 PAGE 2 � Public pu�se sezved t,�, this re�quiranent is to pz�ovide aciequate oQen spaoe areas around irxi�istrial stnictures far aesthetic and fire fic�ting PuucPo�s • B. S'TATID i�,RDSHIP: "bcisting building is at this setback." C. AII�SIl�IST�TIVE STAFF REV�nI: The petitioner.3tylmark, is requesting a variar�ce which wauld reduoe the front yard setback required for an industrial building adjacent to a residential district fran 100 feet to 47.9 feet. Stylmark is prnposing to canstru,ct an ac]dition wIiich w�u1d confoan with the existing frant building setback and utilize tiie current building layout. The addition will provide additional offioe, cafeteria, and bathYncxn facilities. The City has previvusly approved t�ao similar requests from this property. The first varianoe was qz-a�nted in p�ugust 1973 �ich reduced the front yard setback fram 100 feet to 41.9 feet for the ooa�stn�ction of an office add.ition. Another variance was apprvved in Noveni.�er 1985 which reduced the frant yard setback from 100 feet to 82 feet to ca�struct a warehouse additioci. A variance is justified if the strict application of the zoning ordu�ance wvuld cause undue hardsfiip for tlie property owr�er because of the site's characteristics. Sty]mark is situated on 9.3 acres of industrial ].ar�d. The existing building is located on the southern e.nd of the site ar�ci cavers 16$ of the land. This location provides aatple e�ansion opnortunities to the north of the building without the necessity of a vari.ance. If this area was iised to e�ar►d, the petitioner caild not utilize the existing floor layaut. Therefore, the han3ship is actually created by the building itself arxi not the site's d�aracteristics. Carisideratian shaild be qiven to this but also to the fact that two similar requests have been previously approved for this praperty. This Proposal ooR�3ies with all other applicable zoning requiz�nents exoept for par3cing supply. Clirrently, the site oontains 95 spaoes, 76 of �ich are Lt�ed by its 77 e�ployees. 'I'!�e pronosed addition would inci�ase the nunber of spaoes required fran 110 to 116. Due to the actual rnmiber of enployees, the application of this ordinanoe may be invalid. Staff suggests that the petitioner submit a site plan at the t,ime of building permit applica- tio�n which would delir�eate a 21 stall parking lot for future use if a parking shortage does oocur and is deen�ed neoessaay by the City. If appz�ved, staff reoatmends the follvwing cc�ditioa�s be attac�►ed to the pe=mit: 1. TY�e ar3dition be architecturally astQati.ble with the existinq building. 2. T�e applicant shall sutmit a lar�dscape plan to the aty Staff for a reviaa � aPPi'o'val prior t�o the buildin4 Permit issuance. Zlze plan shall ���e ��5�9 P��� 1at scree�in9 from public right-of-way. Iarsciscapir�q to be ins�� },�, Jiaie 1, 1989. -� t . ,c APPEALS CQNMISSION NtE�rING, NOVII�ZBEf2 15, 1988 PAGE 3 3. Prior to building pennit issuance, Stylmark shall st�Yxnit a site plan which would delineate a 21 stall parking lot for future use if a shortage of stalls occurs and is deeqned necessazy by the City. 4. Future building expansion shall occur to the north to minimize the need for future variances on the south side. Mr. Clark show�ed an aerial photo of the property. He stated Stylmark is proposing to construct the new office addition at the same front yard setback as the original building. He stated Mr. Otto and Mr. Mooty were at the meeting to an.sw�er any questions the Catmissioners might have. Mr. Clark shvwed an elevation of the property and a layout shawing the existing characteristics of the present office area. It d�nonstrates that if they are going to add office space, the proposed location was the most logical one. Dr. Vos asked what kind of relationship Sty]mark had with its neighbors. Mr. Mooty stated they have a very good relationship with their neighbors. As far as he knew, t11ey hav�e never had any prablems with the neighbors. MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Mr. Sherek, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, AIS, V(7I'ING AYE, CHAIRPII2SON BARNA DDCI�ARFD THE PUBLIC HEARING CIASID AT 7:55 P.M. Mr. Kuechle stated he lives in this general area, although not on Main Street. He stated he thought Stylmark was a v�ery nice looking busi.ness with clean, well kept grounds. He would be in favor of re�iending approval of the variance with stipulations. Mr. Sherek stated this loaked like a good plan, and Stylmark has been a good neighbor in Fridley's catm�rcial canmznity. He would vote in favor of the variance. Ms. Savage stated she also agre�..�3. The building is very attractive, and it does not intrude into the residentiG' area. 4�at Stylmark is req�est�ng is a setback that is alreadv existir�- with the original building. She could see no reascc� to deny the variance when, on twn previous occasions, variances w�ere granted. 5he would be in favor of the varianoe. Dr. Vos stated this was a reasonable request, and Stylmark was keeping the site lines the same on Main Street. He would wte in fawr of the variance also. Mr. Barna stated he was also in fawr of reconmerxiing approval of the variance. The building would look nice architecturally. i � k APPF.ALS OQ�T�IISSION MEE.TING, IJ(n1II�iBgt 15, 1988 PAGE 4 IN�ION by Dr . Vos , seoorxied by Ms . Savage , to reo�'id to City Counci 1 apprwal of variance request, VAR #88-26, by Donn Mooty, pursvant to Section 205.17.03.D,(4),(a), of the Fridley City Code to reduce the front yard setback from a street right-of- way abuttinq a residential district fran 100 feet to 47.9 feet t,o allow the oonstruction of an addition to the existing building an Lots 2-10, Block 6, Rice Creek Plaza, South Addition, the saane being 6536 Main Street N.E. (Stylmark), with the follvwing stipulations:. 1. The addition be architecturally oatq�ati:ble with the existing building. 2. Zhe applicant shall submit a landscape plan to tl�e City Staf.f for a review and appraval prior to the buildir�g pennit issuance. Zhe plan shall increase the existing parking lot screeni�g fnzn public right--c�f-•way. Iandscaping to be installed by J�e l, 1989 3. Prior tA building permit issuanoe� Stylmark shall submit a site plan �ich would delineate a 21 stall parking lot for future use if a shortage of stalls occurs and is de�ied neoessazy by the City. 4. Ftiiture building exparLSion shall oocur to the north to minimize the need for future variances on t�ie soutli sic3�e. UPON A VOICE VOTE, AL�I, VdrING AYE� CI�IRPER.SON BF,RNP, DDC7�RID TI� MCyI'ION CARRIID iJI�1NIt�UJSLY. rsr. Clark stated this item would go to the City Cauncil on Deceqnber 19, 1988. OF 1989 CGI�T�iISSION MEE,TING DATE� : MC7rION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to appr�ve t1'�e 1989 Appeals Camussion meeting dates as presented arith the follvwing change: OctAber 31 to be chariged to October 24. •• • M • • � M ►� �• • �1••� • •J P � �M • '1�� 1 • • • ��� ►: �MIu � `1 • � • ' 1� 1�ION by Mr. 5herek, seoor�ded by Mr. Kuedzle, to adjrnirn the meeting. Upon a wice vote, all v�ting aye� Chairpersoa� Barna declared the Nov. 15, 1988, Appeals Crnmissian meeting adjovrned at 7:55 p.m. Respectfully sulxnitted, ... C;j''r � � �+ _� � L Sai�a iteo�rdirx� Secretazy . . ' CITY OF FRIDLEY JOINT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COL�4YfISSION/ ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING NO��EMBER 22, 1988 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Dahlberg, Environmental Quality Commission (EQC), called the November 22, 1988, Joint EQC/Energy Commission meeting to order at 7:37 p.m. ROLL CALL Members Present: Paul Dahlberg, Dean Saba, Steve Stark, Richard Svanda Members Absent: Bruce Bondow, Bradley Sielaff, Wayne k'ellan Others Present: Lisa Campbell, Planning Assistant APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 18, 1988, JOINT EQC/ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Stark, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve the October 18, 1988, Joint EQC/Energy Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON DAHLBERG DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. NEW BUSINESS a. Multi-Unit Energy Audits, Phase II Ms. Campbell indicated that a second meeting for Multi-Unit Energy Audits has been scheduled for Tuesday, December 6, for those who responded but were unable to attend the first session and for those who did not respond. The mailing also included Columbia Heights. Again, this is occurring at no cost to the City. Mr. Stark asked the definition of multi-unit. Ms. Campbell indicated multi-unit includes buildings with 4 to 50 units. The Minneapolis Energy Office is also interested in doing single family. Once they get underway, they will advertise in the newspaper. b. Compost Site Closing/Capacity Ms. Campbell showed members a picture of the compost s-ite taken on November 8, 1988. At that time, the site was at capacity. A resident had called Ms. Campbell and told her the site had been closed on October 31, which was done in 1987. Because the site was at capacity and a precedent had been set, the site was closed this year on October 31. ti � JOINT EQC/ENERGY COIrIl�SISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 22, 1988 PAGE 2 The compost site has approximately 1100 cubic yards of yard waste. The site is one-third of an acre (the criteria for capacity is 3,000 cubic yards per acre) so the site is at or iust ahove c�nacit;�. Ms. Nancy ScfiumacFier, University of Minnesota, reviewed the site and said the compost was in good condition. Ms. Campbell referred to the article, "Options for Municipal Leaf Composting", BioCycle, October, 1988, included with the agenda. The article describes three levels of technology for composting. The City is using the minimum level. At a recent conference Ms. Campbell had attended; they discussed very high level maintenance techniques. Ms. Campbell indicated the situation at the compost site was not as bad as she thought. Ms. Schumacher has agreed to provide the City with a written report, the cost of which will be reimbursed by the Anoka County Joint Powers Agreement. Ms. Campbell received numerous calls and complaints during the week the site was closed, and there has been some dumping at the site and across the street since the closing. Mr. Stark asked if the closing date could be flexible. Ms. Campbell agreed it was an option, but this year the site was filled and the precedent set to close on October 31. The site capacitv is about 1,000 cubic yards. Ttie compost at the site was paced off and an estimate of quantity made. Mr. Svanda asked what would happen next year if the compost takes one year to decompose. Ms. Campbell indicated that the site could take yard waste seasonally as is now done and the City could have yard waste pick-up from the haulers, who must take it to Bunker Hills or Chain of Lakes. There is a system in place for the haulers, and there are precedents in other cities to have haulers pick up yard waste (leaves and grass). Ms. Campbell has read through the refuse hauling ordinance. She noted there was an area where yard waste could be added with a clear definition and picked up seasonally as a separate item. It has been suggested to contact the haulers and get their input. Mr. Svanda thought it important to include the haulers in the process. Mr. Stark asked if the City or County had concerns about when we start generating a lot of compost. Ms. Campbell indicated this issue will be addressed by Ms. Schumacher. including what the threshold of the site would be and what to do with the compost product. Mr. Stark indicated that at the State, there is a Governor's executive order that requires state agencies to use compost in place of topsoil if the price of the compost is equal to or less than the cost of the topsoil. Perhaps the City could require, as a part of the building permit, the use of compost if it is available and meets the builders' needs. This could include projects the City is doing and also commercial enterprises. Q � JOINT EQC/ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 22, 1988 PAGE 3 Mr. Dahlberg also suggested using compost for County projects. As another alternative, the City could inform some of the landscaping contractors in the community that compost is available and is cheaper than topsoil. Mr. Starlc indicated that it may be necessary to include more areas should the quantity of compost available become a problem. Ms. Campbell stated another option is not to have a site, if this would become.a management problem. Haulers could pick up yard waste seasonally in which case the residents would be charged for the service. Or residents could use the Bunker Hills site. Ms. Campbell has gathered a number of videos from the Waste Management Board/MPCA on composting which could be shown on cable to promote the idea of backyard composting. Backyard composting may also raise some code enforcement issues, ie. odor, monitoring to make sure it is being done properly, problems with wildlife nesting in or near the compost. Ms. Campbell indicated it is important to educate residents on how to properly care for their compost site to prevent these problems. Ms. Campbell stated that Jim Froehle has agreed to include an article on compost in the next city newsletter which will come out in the spring. Mr. Svanda asked that the City Manager be asked to attend a future meeting to get his input. Ms. Campbell was asked to invite the City Manager to the January meeting. Mr. Svanda indicated that the haulers would charge extra to pick up yard waste and wondered how that would affect the ordinance. Ms. Campbell stated she would let the City Council know what that charge would be. Another encouraging thing that started was that one hauler has started low volume fees. The charge for less than 60 gallons is $11, anything over 60 gallons is approximately $14, and the piece-by-piece charge is higher. Ms. Campbell indicated that this is a response to a State mandate. Mr. Dahlberg asked if people have been informed that compost is available for them to use. Mr. Campbell stated this had not been done, but is something that could be done. Mr. Saba indicated one problem with compost is weed seeds. Ms. Campbell indicated that with Ms. Schumaker's assistance the compost can be graded for product quality. rir. Stark indicated that this may require a higher level of technology. You can add water and fertilizer and turn it, in so doing raising the temperature that the weed seeds are killed. JOINT EQC/ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 22, 1988 PAGE 4 Mr. Dahlberg felt that, if the City is offering a place for residents to drop off yard waste and also saying they could use the compost in the future, the City should make a reasonable product for their use. Mr. Stark indicated it may not be cost effective to do so for the City level, but may be cost effective at the County level. Ms. Campbell indicated the County is set up to do that. The Public Works Director has indicated he would like the site closed. His staff maintain the compost site so their is consideration of cost benefit. Mr. Stark stated that after one year there would likely be seeds in the compost, but that is not likely after three years, with minimum maintenance. Ms. Campbell added that an increase in technology means an increase in the cost. Mr. Saba asked if there would be a benefit to compacting. Mr. Stark indicated that the composted materials need to be aerated in order to decay. Compacting would make it anearobic. One way to aerate is to windrow the compost materials and then run through a snow blot��r truck. Ms. Campbell indicated that the City uses compost for park and recreation sites. Mr. Dahlberg felt there is merit to the cost of sterilizing the compost. If the City is going to use it and gain some benefit, it could still be less expensive than buying topsoil. Mr. Stark indicated there are all kinds of levels of maintenance and labor is a major part of maintenance. Mr. Dahlberg recommended having facts and figures available. As an example, the cost to get a good product versus the savings by not having to purchase topsoil. Ms. Campbell indicated that the County is already set up for maintenance. Mr. Dahlberg suggested, after one or two years, the materials could be moved to the County site. There would be costs associated with any alternative, but this could be a way to keep the site open. Ms. Campbell indicated this alternative would have a transportation problem. The yard waste amendment has a time line which is April. Mr. Stark asked if the City would need a solid waste permit to have a compost site. � JOINT EQC/ENERGY COh�iISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 22, 1988 PAGE 5 Ms. Campbell stated there is a set of criteria or guidelines. If there is a complaint, the EPA comes out. Mr. Svanda suggested calling Waste Management to obtain some figures. Mr. Stark indicated this could be short-term. Once it is mandated, it could be taken over by the County. Mr. Saba indicated that the people will still have to pay whether it be through taxes or fees for haulers. Ms. Campbell indicated that Bunker Hills charges $2.50 per cubic yard. The yard kaste is measured when it is dumped. The focus is to provide an effective response to a state mandate and provide alternatives to the citizens. c. Resolutions/Solid Waste Abatement Mandate Reform Ms. Campbell indicated the resolutions came out of the August 29 City Council Conference meeting. The resolution reqtiesting the State to provide funding to support solid waste abatement activities supports having the State impose a tax for those who create and distribute non- biodegradable goods. This is in reaction to the imposition of a mandatory source separation ordinance by Anoka County which has already been passed. Mr. Stark felt the term "nonbiodegradable" should be "nonrecyclable". As written, it implies that it is okay to biodegradable things in the landfill, when in fact biodegradable waste is part of the problem. Mr. Svanda indicated he had heard that other cities are providing services and initiatives for solid waste abatement. Ms. Campbell agreed that this is being done in other cities. And, if the City of Fridley does not do these things, they will fall behind. Ms. Campbell stated she has not seen a long term policy statement regarding these issues. Mr. Stark indicated that some of the cities that provide initiatives are faced with a problem. Mr. Dahlberg felt that having the City Manager attend a meeting would be helpful. Ms. Campbell indicated that the resolution on solid waste abatement does in concept support solid waste abatement. An information meeting will be held on November 30 at the Anoka County Courthouse at 7:00 p.m. to discuss the solid waste abatement issues. MOTION by Mr. Stark, seconded by Mr. Saba, to amend the resolution regarding solid waste abatement, approved by the City Council on November 21, 1988, page 2, paragraph 2, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED ..., . the term "nonbiodegradable" be changed to "nonrecyclable". UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON DAHLBERG DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. JOINT EQC/ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 22, 1988 PAGE 6 d. Preliminary Workplan Initiatives Ms. Campbell indicated this item had been previously discussed. Ms. Campbell will continue to include the workplan on the agenda and take more time to discuss, particularly in the energy portion. Mr. Svanda asked the cost of making and putting up the yard signs. Ms. Campbell did not have the figures, but will get the information. The new signs were fairly expensive but were paid for through a grant. 2. OLD BUSINESS a. Radon Update/Conference and Article Ms. Campbell attended a conference regarding radon. In a survey it was found that 44% of the homes in Minnesota exceed the EPA's 4.0 pCi/1 guideline level. The results cannot be geographically inter- preted. This will probably change in the next year. The Federal government has passed legislation which will give to each state $10 million per year for three years for testing and mitigation programs. What the Federal EPA is sayin� is the same measures that can reduce the 4,0 pCi/1 radon level can ef�ectively reduce it to a level of 0.2 or 0.7 Mr. Dahlberg asked if the long term goal is to get radon to that level. Ms. Campbell indicated one article advises homeowners to test and reduce at the 4 pCi/1 level. However, there is another article that states radon is not a problem. Ms. Campbell indicated the article on radon for the city newsletter has been sent to the printers and is printed. Mr. Dahlberg suggested, in the first paragraph, second sentence, could be better read as "The only known health rish associated with exposure to radon.and radon decay products is an increased risk of lung cancer." Mr. Dahlberg asked why smoking was tied in. It would appear that smoking caused the radon gas. Mr. Saba indicated there is a correlation between smoking and radon increasing lung cancer. He was not sure there was a better manner in which to phrase the information. Mr. Dahlberg stated the article provided information and sources of information. Ms. Campbell indicated she had added information regarding the concern about contractors. - Mr. Dahlberg expressed concern that there will be calls asking what drain tile suction or pressurizing means. ` r 0 JOINT EQC/ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 22, 1988 PAGE 7 Ms. Campbell indicated this information came from a technical article. The article cannot be changed, but Ms. Campbell will prepare for questions. b. Recycling Update Ms. Campbell indicated that this is the third month this year with 46 tons. Participation from January has increased from 15% to 26%, which is constdered a moderate rate of participation. A telephone survey done liy the League of Wamen Voters, who cantacted approximately 910 people, sfiowed people were recycling, were aware of recycling programs, or intended to recycle. Ms. Connie Metcalf said that in 1979 and 1984, people were generally unaware of the City's programs. Ms. Campbell indicated that she has been contacted by a student who is doing a thesis on Fridley's prosrams and low cost ways to promote the programs. Ms. Campbell attended a meeting of the League of Women Voters. The group was under the assumption that the recycling program has low participation, and they had many questions that they asked at the meeting. As far as the yard signs, Ms. Campbell indicated that when people call in saying they have been missed for curbside pick up a sign is taken out to their home. This will be done until the signs are gone. Mr. Saba asked for an update of recycling bins. Ms. Campbell indicated that the funds from the Lions is committed and when the City is ready to purchase, they will send a check. Mr. Saba asked what is stopping us from getting the bins. Ms. Campbell indicated that she is waiting for a comprehensive plan for a long-'term approach. Mr. Dahlberg indicated that attempts have been made for fund raising and to have the cost assessed. Ms. Campbell indicated the issue is not resolved. Bins are a major expense, and the emphasis has been on other ways to increase participation.� Mr. Saba felt that if some bins were given away, other could be sold. Perhaps you could work with the staff at Plymouth. Ms. Campbell indicated that the City of Plymouth purchased bins for every household in the city. It may be possible to have a pilot project in Maynard Nielsen's area, and monitor recycling levels before and after bins. Mr. Saba recommended providing bins to those who have signs as a reward for having signs and to spread the bins out more in the city. This could create stimuli. c a. JOINT EQC/ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 22, 1988 PAGE 8 Mr. Dahlberg agreed. The funds are available for use for recycling bins. He felt the commission should move ahead. Mr. Saba noted that once the Lions do this, other civic organizations could likely follow suit. Mr. Dahlberg asked, if plans were to proceed and buy bins with the funds, what process would need to be followed. Ms. Campbell.indicated that the cost for bins would be about $10.50 for a set of two bins, plus the cost for the Lions logo. She estimated that about 300 sets of bins could be placed out in the community. Mr. Saba stated that an article in the newspaper could state in essence that the bins would be an investment in the future. Mr. Stark liked the idea of having a study. If there could be shown that there is a solid increase in recycling due to the bins, it would be information that could be made available for other potential contributors. It would be nice to show that we picked this neighborhood and that the participation rates increased. Mr. Saba felt it would be more effective to spread out through the City. If bins are provided for an area, he could foresee people complaining about "why didn't I get one?" He asked how many recycling signs were out. Ms. Campbell did not know. She has gotten away from the block captains, and providing signs to those persons who were missecl for curbside pick up. Ms. Campbell liked the idea of a pilot program. Mr. Dahlberg asked Ms. Campbell to proceed. c. Multi-Unit Recycling/Black Forest Condominiums Ms. Campbell referred to the information as provided with the agenda. Basically, the information shows that the request was followed up and some suggestions were provided. Ms. Gayle Prest, Columbia Heights Recycling Coordinator, provided technical assistance. 3. OTHER BUSINESS a. Fridley League of Women Voters This item was discussed as part of the Recycling Update. b. Household Hazardous Waste Ms. Campbell indicated she had written to the County Commissioners asking them to sponsor a one-day program for the collection of household hazardous waste. In a conversation with Jim Kordiak, Chairman of the Anoka County Board of Commissioners, Ms. Campbell suggested the County support a collection day. j � � JOINT EQC/ENERGY COI�IISSION MEETING, NOVEMBER 22, 1988 PAGE 9 c �� S�ringbrook Nature Center - Education Component Mr. Dahlberg showed an article on Rudy Refuse. Mr. Stark asked if Ms. Campbell had the videos of the recycling and energy programs. Ms. Campbell stated there would be a 15-minute highlight at the next meeting. Mr. Saba asked if Rudy Refuse could be used as a park character. Ms. Campbell indicated that although the staff at the Nature Center would like to do this, time does not allow. Mr. Dahlberg felt the program was very good. The article shows an outline of the presentation very well. One thing not in the article that he felt was interesting was the cages used to show the decaying process of both natural and man-made products. Resignations Ms. Campbell announced that Mr. Bruce Hanley and Mr. Gerald Welf have resigned from the Energy Commission. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Mr. Svanda, seconded by Mr. Saba, to adjourn the meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON DAHLBERG DELCARED THE NOVEMBER 22, 1988, JOINT EQC/ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:40 P.M. Respectfully submitted, , ` ��+ � � � Lavonn Cooper Recordinb Secretary _y � ;,,� � , � CITY OF FRIDLEY HUMAN RESOURCES COI�IISSION MEETING, DECEMBER 1, 1988 -------------------•----------------•-------------___----•------- CALL TO ORDER• Chairperson Sherek called the December 1, 1988, Human Resources Commission meeting to order at 7:37 p.m. RQLL CALL: Members Present: Members Absent: Others Present: Sue Sherek, Sue Jackson, Francis van Dan, Paul Westby Claudia Dodge Steven Barg, Planning Assistant Kathlyn Castle, Planning Assistant APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 6 1988 HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES MOTION by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Mr. van Dan to approve the October 6, 1988, Human Resources Commisison minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SHEREK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. APPROVAL OF AGENDA• MOTION by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Mr. van Dan, to approve the agenda as written. . UPON A VOICE VOTE, 1�lLL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SHEREK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Sherek stated that the order of the aqenda should be changed so that Mr. Tim Turnbull could be first on the agenda. NEW BUSINESS: a. Review Current Status of Police/Community Relations: Tim Turnbull, Public Safety Projects Coordinator Ms. Sherek stated the reason Mr. Turnbull was on the agenda was to outline the current status of the police/community relations and the potential, if any, there might be for coordinating other things in with the Fridley Crime Watch program. Mr. Turnbull stated the Neighborhood Crime Watch program was started in 1978. The Police Dept. organized one neighborhood in the Benjamin/Briardale area to do a demonstration project, ,�, -- t .. r- -4 .\ V_ because that neiqhborhood had been having problems with burglaries. They had meetinqs with the neighbors and talked about ways the neiqhbors and Police Dept. could work better together. Mr. Turnbull stated the program incorporates the idea that each block have a block captain, and then the Police Dept. communicates with that block caRtain, either by telephone or by mail, to tell them about things they should know that are qoing on in and around their neighborhood. The block captains, in turn, pass out information provided by the Police Dept. to their neighbors that tells the neighbors what is happeninq in their neighborhood and for them to take the appropriate response. Mr. Turnbull stated this program has been very successful to date. The program is now about 10 years old. They started with one neighborhood, and he believed there were now about 35-36 neighborhoods, and approximately 350+ plus volunteers in the program. The Police Department does have some concerns about the deterioration of neighborhoods now that the program is 10 years old, so the Police Department is now in the process of puttinq toqether a plan to rejuvenate the neighborhoods. Mr. Turnbull stated he would like to share some of the successes they have had with this program. Over the last 3 years, they have seen burglaries to be at the lowest level they have ever seen in the City. Last year, he believed the burglary rate was very close to the lowest they have ever seen. He handed out some information that was part of a monthly report as part of the neighborhood program that indicated where burgl�ries and thefts were occurring. Mr. Turnbull stated that over the last few years they have had some trouble keeping staff in the crime prevention program. However, for 1989, they have upgraded the pay for this position and they hope to attract a qualified person and be able to maintain that person lonq enough to be a benefit to the program. It takes about 18 months - 2 years for a person to become real familiar with the job. (Mr. Westby arrived at 7:47 p.m.) Mr. Turnbull etated the neiqhborhood program is a very good place to incorporate and add other types of issues. In the pa�t, they have looked at the recycling issue. It was throuqh the neiqhborhood program that the recycling signs were given to block captains. The program has been incorporated with the senior proqram. There is a lot of concern in the City of Fridley that the averaqe age and the demographics of the , 4 s." �a �� $OMAN REBOIIRC88 C014II88IOl�T 1�B8TINQ. D$C$MBBR 1. 1988 PAGE 3 community seem to indicate that the population is becoming older. So, now when have a neighborhood meeting, they include someone familiar with the senior proqram or information about the senior proqram in an attempt to try and locate and identify in the neighborhoods at the block level where and who the seniors are. Hopefully, they can help link those seniors living in the�neighborhoods with the senior programs that are available to them. Mr. Turnbull stated that adding more responsibilities to the program does mean more work for the staff, and staff can only do so much, and it forces them into the situation where they must prioriti2e what needs to be done. Mr. Turnbull stated that as far as the issue of community relations, the neighborhood program traditionally has played a key role in developinq very positive relations between the Police Department and the neighborhoods. Hopefully, that has some carry-over effect with the City of Fridley governmental operations in general. Mr. Turnbull stated the Commission members might have a different "feel" for the way community relations are between the Police Department and the community. If so, he would be interested in hearinq what additional roles the Police Department could play in community relations. A very important part of what they do in Special Projects is to try and promote good community relations between the Police Department and the members of the community they serve. Mr. Turnbull stated the program primarily functions in single family, residential areas, although there are some multiple areas it encompasses; for example, the Rice Creek Townhouses. There are approximately 10,000 total residential units in the City, and there are around 6,300 single family residential units in the City. Because the proqram is focused on single family, probably around 85-90$ of all the single family areas are covered by the neiqhborhood program. This is far more than most other communities in the metropolitan area. In the past, they have tried and are still trying to provide a quality level of security and service, while at the same time trying not to increase the number of police officers. Because of this philosophy, they really need to have a very good partnership between the people in the neighborhoods and the Police Department. - Ms. Sherek stated regardinq community/police relations, one of the things that impresses her children when they visit their grandparents who live in Minneapolis is that police officers stop and talk to the children. �+. _ , � , HUMAN RE80IIRCB8 COMMIBBION KBBTII�G. D8C8![BEIt 1. 1988 - PAGE 4 �� Mr. Turnbull stated if it is the community standard for law enforcement to provide such services as that mentioned by Ms. Sherek, then the Police Department needs to know that and needs to look at some ways to address that. The Commission also needs to know and understand before they make they make that decision that the Police Department is getting busier without any i�crease in police officers. Ms. Sherek asked if a survey had been done in the City of Fridley within the last ten years by the Police Department or the City to determine the level of satisfaction or what level of service the community would like to have. Mr. Turnbull stated a survey was done in the summer of 1978 that tried to determine, amonq other things, what the community's feelings were for the Police Department. At that time, the response was very positive toward the Police Department. He stated it was his understanding that Mr. William Burns, the new City Manager, was in favor of having a survey done every two years which would serve a variety of issues, and he believed the Police Department would be an area that would be included. Mr. Turnbull stated once they hire someone for the neighborhood proqram, it is the Police Department's desire to put a person back into the elementary schools. The Police Department services programming for grades 1-6. Ms. Sherek asked if there was anythinq the Commission could do as far as a recommendation to the Council. Mr. Turnbull stated it was not his intent to ask for any recommendation from the Commission. Iie just wanted the Commission members to be aware of the things that are going on. They cannot go into everyone's home in the community and tell them in some detail what is going on in the Police Department, but he thought it was important for the Commission members to know. Then, when it is appropriate, they Commission can take the knowledqe and the communication he has shared with them, evaluate it, and see what level of service they would like to see in this community. Howver, when they are making these decisions, they should recognize the situation that exists in the Police Department. Ms. Sherek thanked Mr. Turnbull for coming and making this information with the Commission. b. Presentation on Parents' Communication Network: Carol Miller Mr. Barg stated Ms. Miller could not be at the meeting because of a family emergency. i �� � � � HUMAN RE80IIRCg8 COIrDiZBBION l�tEBTINa. DBC8�i8ER 1. 1988 PAGE 5 Mr. Turnbull stated Ms. Miller had asked him to apologize to the Commission. He stated the Parents' Communication Network is very new. It is a group of parents within the City of Fridley who are concerned about the issue of druq abuse. They are kind of an information sharing/resource to each other. They put out a newsletter on a quarterly basis. Carol Miller and Rathy Divine who got the idea from some other communities took it upon themselves to form this qroup. Mr. Turnbull stated he feels this group will perform a very valuable service to this community and that it is a very worthwhile effort. Mr. Turnbull stated Ms. Miller would like to make a presentation to the Commission about the Parents' Communication Network. He thought they would probably like some quidance on how to continue to operate and possibly some financial resources that would enable them to have the newsletter free to anyone who wants it. Mr. Turnbull stated a representative from Parents' Communication Network would be at the next Human Resources Commission meeting. c. Consideration of Meeting Calendar for 1989 The Commission members approved the 1989 meeting calendar which continued the meetinqs on the first Thursday of each month at 7:30 p.m., with the change that the July meeting be cancelled. OLD BUSINESS: a. Update on Handicapped Accessibility Project Mr. Barg stated the training of volunteers for the accessibility project was underway. They have about 20 volunteers at this time, and they hope to get more so that it will be easier for those making the surveys. Mr. Barg stated Mike Reilland, who works part-time in the City Manager's Office, will be responsible for the mailings and helping put the booklet together. They will soon start mailing surveys to the businesses and getting people out to do the surveys . Mr. Barg stated there are several ways to look at the focus of the Handicapped Accessibility Guide: (1) How it started--as a guide to the disabled person who �. � �� AUMAN RESOIIRCEB CO�IBBION 1[B$TIN�i. D$CBMBBR 1. 1988 - PAGE 6 w wants to go to a restaurant or business place and to know what places are and are not accessible. (2) Education--helpinq to educate the business on what the owner can do to make the business more accessible and to help attract more business. Mr. Barq stated that from that point of view, the businesses they want to look at are service-type businesses, so they hope to cut the list of businesses down considerably for the survey. Mr . Barq stated that in response to Ms . Sherek' s concern about visual and hearing impairments, there is a separate form that deals with things for the visually impaired and TTY access for the hearing impaire�i. b. Consideration of CDBG Funds to Assist Reading Programs in Schools Ms. Sherek stated she had volunteered to draft a letter to the school principals in Fridley asking them about possible participation in CDBG funding to assist reading programs in the schools. She stated she would draft a letter for consideration by the Commission at their January meeting. c. Consideration of 1988-89 Workplan Ms. Sherek asked staff to send copies of the existing 1987-88 workplan to the Commission members for consideration at the January meeting. The Commission members should look at the workplan format and come up with any related topics for discussion. They should have their workplan in place by March 1989 before they start work on CDBG in April. • � • • ���� MOTION by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Mr. van Dan, to adjourn the meetinq. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Sherek declared the motion carried unanimously. Resp�ctfully subnbitted, � � � %!'7:`. ��� i�.�%-tL Lyn g- Saba Recordinq Secretary