PL 12/07/1988 - 30691,�
r
,�
�
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, DECEMBER 7, 1988
____.,____,.________.._,..._....__..___..,,__.._______..____...,_______.._______
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Betzold called the December 7, 1988, Planning
Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL•
Members Present: Donald Betzold, Dave Kondrick, Dean Saba,
Sue Sherek, Alex Bar�a, Paul Dahlberg
Members Absent: None
Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
Kathlyn Castle, Planning Assistant
Dale Edstrom, Northco Corp.
Bruce Carlson, Northco Corp.
Tom Gerster, KKE Architects
Jim Benson, B,M, & B, Inc., Mpls.
Dave Koski, Barton-Aschman Assoc.
Ron Mattson, 7324 Symphony Street N.E.
A1 Quam, 399 - 73rd Avenue N.E.
Ron Killian, 7301 Concerto Curve N.E.
APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 9, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve the
November 9, 1988, Planning Commission minutes as written.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
l, PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT. P.S. #88-02,
NORTHCO CORPORATION BUSINESS PARK. BY FRIDLEY BUSINESS CENTER
PARTNERSHIP COMPANY CJO NORTHCO CORPORATION:
Being a replat of Tracts A and B, Registered Land Survey No. 6, and
Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 78, generally located at 500 -
73rd Avenue N.E.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Barna, to waive the reading
of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing.
UPOAT A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPER50N BETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:32 P.M.
Mr. Dahlberg stated that at this time he would excuse himself from
the discussion and voting on this issue for reasons discussed
,---�
�
PLANNING COMMIBBION MEETINa. DECEMHER 7, 1988 PAGE 2
earlier with Chairperson Betzold.
Ms. Castle stated the petitioner, Northco Corporation, was
requesting consideration of a preliminary plat to replat Tracts A
and B, Registered Land Survey No. 6, and Tract B, Registered Land
Survey No. 78. The property is located north of 71st Avenue, south
of 73rd Avenue, and east of University Avenue.
Ms. Castle stated the property is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial. To
the north is single family and to the south is a public facilities
district which contains the City of Fridley Public Works Garage and
the City's recycling center. It also contains the regional
recreation facilities, Columbia Arena and Locke Park.
Ms. Castle stated the proposed plat would subdivide the property
into il industrial lots, ranging from 2- 19 acres in size. The
westerly portion of the plat is dasigned for the further
development of buildings that would house light industrial uses
such as office, warehouse, and manufacturing businesses.
Ms. Castle stated the eastern portion of the plat is designed
around the existing industrial businesses located on the site--
Carter Day, Knox Lumber.
Ms. Castle stated the plat's proposed lot lines do encroach upon
some of the existing parking facilities; therefore, it will be
necessary to obtain some joint driveway/parking easements from the
developer.
Ms. Castle stated access to the lots within the site will be gained
from an interior S-shaped road off 73rd Avenue around to the
University Avenue Service Drive. In addition, since the lots have
double frontage, 73rd Avenue and 71st Avenue will provide access
to some individual parcels. Currently, 71st Avenue does serve as
the gateway to the region's recreational facilities, but also
serves as access to the City Garage and recycling center. Because
of its quasi-industrial state, staff does not object to access off
71st Avenue; however, the developer must upgrade the road to the
required industrial standards to serve the additional truck
traffic. Currently, 71st Avenue is only a 7 ton road.
Ms. Castle stated the Public Works Department has requested
revisions from the developer regarding street/driveway intersection
and intersection right-of-way widths. The current layout of the
proposed road could cause potential traffic problems with the
existing interior driveways.
Ms. Castle stated that due to the site's natural characteristics,
^ Siah St. Clair, City Naturalist, conducted a field survey with
staff to determine tree preservation on the site. Mr. St. Clair
did suggest that staff encourage preservation of trees 6 inches in
,� PLANNINQ COMMI88ION ME$TINa. DECEMBER 7, 1988 - PAGE 3
diameter or larger on the site's west and south sides. The tree
grove on the site's north side contains older, dying trees;
therefore, trees with a diameter of 4 inches should be preserved
in that area. Staff has suggested that landscaping is needed to
screen the industrial development from the residential district to
the north.
Ms. Castle stated this proposal is consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The development will increase the
economic wellbeing of the community, while providing an attractive
physical environment. The division of land into smaller parcels
should attract less intense industrial uses which are more
compatible with the residential community than heavy industrial
uses.
Ms. Castle stated staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat
with the following stipulations:
l. A development agreement be executed between the petitioner and
the City Council which includes, but is not limited to:
A. Design criteria
B. Landscape maintenance
C. Tree preservation
�``, D. Street and utility improvements
2. A storm drainage plan which either encompasses a comprehensive
drainage plan or individual drainage plans for each lot shall
be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit.
3. The developer shall petition the City to construct and improve
the necessary roadways and utilities in order to provide the
adequate infrastructure to support the development.
4. Access from 73rd Avenue shall be limited to one driveway.
5. Access from 71st Avenue shall be limited to four driveways.
6. The necessary joint driveway/parking easements shall be
executed for Lots 5, 6 and 7 and Lots 7 and 8, Block 2.
7. A revised preliminary plat providing adequate right-of-way at
the intersections shall be submitted to the Public Works
Department for review prior to preliminary plat review before
the City Council.
8. The developer shall submit a proposed plan for driveway access
at the curve of the proposed street for Public Works
Department review and approval prior to preliminary plat
^ review before the City Council.
Mr. Betzold asked if anyone knew what the traffic impact would be
,,.� PLANNINa COI�tIBBION MEETING, DECEMBER 7. 1988 - PAGE 4
in this area.
Ms. Castle stated Northco has hired a consultant to do a traffic
study, and maybe that person could address that issue.
Ms. Dacy stated it was staff's understanding that when Target
expands, that expansion will trigger an improvement project on 73rd
Avenue N.E. The way the traffic plan and street plan are laid out,
there is a good disbursal of access points into and out of the
site. So, as the development is designed, there should be good
separation between truck traffic and the single family area to the
north.
Mr. Kondrick asked how they could discourage traffic leaving the
property and traveling south along the University Avenue Service
Drive past Columbia Arena to the 69th Avenue/University Avenue
intersection. He stated that intersection is bad enough now
without additional traffic. He was not so much concerned about car
traffic as he was about truck traffic.
Mr. Saba asked what kind of truck traffic was anticipated as far
as volume and size.
� Mr. Bruce Carlson, Northco Corporation, stated he was one of the
members of the Northco petition. He stated they do not have a
formal traffic study at this time, but some information has been
put together by their traffic consultant, Barton-Aschman
Associates.
Mr. Carlson introduced Tom Gerster, KKE Architects, and Dave Koski,
a member of the Barton-Aschman Associates firm involved in traffic
and access studies all over the metropolitan area, and Jim Benson
who was involved with marketing the project.
Mr. Carlson stated Northco is a Twin City based development,
property management, and i�vestment company. They specialize in
retail office in retail office and office/warehouse type projects.
They are not a mega developer, but more of a middle of the market
developer, and they currently operate about 26 different real
estate projects around the Twin Cities area. Nine of these
projects are office/warehouse type projects. They have a fairly
significant background in business park type development, primarily
due to his involvement in an industrial park development in the
Plymouth area. Their basic business approach is to try to be a
cooperative citizen in the communities in which they do business.
Mr. Carlson stated about one year ago in October, they acquired the
Carter Day property. After they acquired the Carter Day facility,
� they became interested in the Chicago/Northwestern property between
Carter Day and University Avenue, primarily because of their
industrial and business park background, and it looked like a
^\ PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING. DECEMHER 7. 1988 - PAGE 5
logical extension of what they were doing in this area.
Mr. Carlson stated they are now at the Planning Commission to
propose a plat which they intend to become a master plan business
park, and they will impose some architectural guidelines on how the
buildings would be developed. They hope the City will agree with
the landscaping and the saving of trees which is one the natural
amenities on this site.
Mr. Carlson stated they think the use they are proposing for the
property is the lowest traffic generator that is likely to occur
on this property, as compared to some other types of commercial
uses.
Mr. Carlson stated they intend to build office, office/warehouse,
showroom, light manufacturing type uses on the property. They will
probably sell some and will probably build for lease on some of the
land. They are not asking for any rezoning or conditional use
permits; and, at this point, do not anticipate they will need any
in the future.
Mr. Carlson stated they had a neighborhood meeting on Novemer 28,
and some of the neighbors who were at that meeting were in
�1 attendance at the Planning Commission meeting. He stated they
presented their proposal to the neighbors and listened to the
concerns expressed by the neighbors. Since then, they have been
working with City staff to make sure they have a development that
is compatible with the wishes of the City of Fridley and also one
that will be successful for them.
Mr. Carlson stated one of the concerns expressed by the neighbors
was the visibility from the homes to the property. There did not
seem to be a lot of concern about traffic. He stated they tried
to demonstrate to the neighbors that this was a compatible and good
use for the property. They felt their overall plan did address all
the concerns of both the City and the neighbors.
Mr. Carlson stated he would like Mr. Gerster to make the
architectural and layout presentation.
Mr. Gerster stated they have been working for a number of months
with Northco Corporation, and more recently with City staff, to
develop a master plan business park that will be a benefit to the
City of Fridley and to Northco. He showed an aerial photo showing
the site and its location in the City, and he showed a schematic
of the actual engineered preliminary plat drawing.
Mr. Gerster stated there are a couple objectives they are trying
,,� to achieve with this project:
1. They have tried to master plan a business park within the
PLANNIN� COMMIB�ION ME$TINa. DECEMBER 7, 1988 PAa� 6
framework of the M-2, industrial zoning, to attract less
intense industrial uses which are more compatible with the
single family area to the north.
2. They will save as many of the existing trees on the site as
possible, because the trees are one of the prime natural
amenities of the site.
Mr. Gerster stated they feel they can be more compatible with the
existing neighborhood by dividing the plat into multiple smaller
parcels trying to go with more of a 2 acre size. They will bring
in smaller buildings which in scale, from a height standpoint, will
be more in the range of the neighboring residential homes.
Mr. Gerster stated they have also voluntarily submitted
architectural guidelines to help control the quality of materials
in the appearance of the buildings as they are seen from the
adjacent roadways and the adjacent residential area.
Mr. Gerster stated one of the things the smaller lots require of
a development like this is the use of an internal roadway to gain
access to each of the lots. This creates frontage for all the lots
on at least one public street.
,�
Mr. Gerster stated they are maintaining minimum setbacks through
the site. At this time, they will not be requesting any variances.
They are also providing a 15 foot bikeway trail easement.
Mr. Gerster stated some of the neighbors have expressed concern
about visibility into the site, and they would like to see
additional screening. He stated they do feel landscaping is very
important to the overall competition of the business park; however,
they cannot entirely screen the buildings because visibility is
very important from surrounding roadways. They would use
landscaping, undulating terrain, or rolling berms to help soften
the appearance of the buildings, but they could not entirely block
the buildings.
Mr. Betzold asked what Northco envisioned for signage--one large
sign for the whole business park or individual signs?
Mr. Gerster stated they do plan to have a sign monument of
decorative masonry materials that would be located along University
Avenue, which would give indication of the entrance to the
business park along the new road which would be the major access
into the site.
Mr. Saba asked about lighting.
� Mr. Gerster stated lighting would typically be the shoebox type
head with a downcast light which shines down and not out. They
�,
;�
�
PLANNINa COMMIBBION MEETINa. DECEMBER 7. 1988 PAGE 7
have been using the shorter poles (25-35 ft.), especially for the
smaller buildings and smaller parking areas.
Mr. Barna asked what kind of businesses would probably go in on
this site.
Mr. Jim Benson stated Fridley has been able to attract a lot of
very small high technical type companies because of the medical
facilities in the City. A number of these sites would be designed
for an R& D type facility, light manufacturing, light industrial,
etc., and which would be low profile buildings.
Mr. Koski stated they have prepared a traffic generation report of
the business park. They anticipate the peak traffic hours to be
7:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. They feel the
traffic generated from this proposal will be almost 10% of what
would be generated by a development such as that proposed by Cub
Foods a few years ago.
Mr. Koski stated the report indicated close to 300 vehicles in and
out of the site during the P.M. peak hours and about 1,300 vehicles
in and out of the site during the day. Of the total traffic into
and out of the site, they expect about 5� and a maximum of 8% will
be trucks of all types. They have reviewed the traffic already at
the key intersection at 73rd Avenue/University Avenue and looked
at the amount of traffic that might come through that intersection
oriented to this new proj ect . That amount of traf f ic does not have
any significant impact on the traffic operations or safety of that
intersection. They would expect about 40% of the traffic entering
and leaving the site will come from the north, 40o will come from
the south on University Avenue, and the remaining 20% will come
from the east on 73rd Avenue.
Mr. Koski stated that in regard to the question about traffic going
to the intersection at 69th Avenue/University Avenue, he would
think that with almost two-thirds of the traffic oriented to the
northern area and one-third of the traffic oriented to the 71st
Avenue/University Avenue intersection. He stated they do not
expect a great deal of traffic on the frontage road to 69th Avenue.
That road and that intersection are not conducive to accommodating
large trucks. Overall, they do not see any impact to traffic
operations or to the safety in the area of traffic generated by the
development. They also do not think any of this traffic will end
up in the residential area at all, simply by virtue of the design
of 73rd Avenue and the deadend nature of 71st Avenue.
Mr. Saba asked how much truck traffic was normally done between
12:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.
Mr. Koski stated the primary trucking traffic into warehousing
sites usually occurs in the morning hours between 6:00 a.m. to
� PLANNINa CONaII88ION MEETINa. DECEMHER 7. 1988 - PAGE 8
11:00 a.m. It tails off sharply in the afternoon, and there is
virtually no truck traffic at night, unless there is some industry
that by its nature would be open at night to accept truck
deliveries, but not very many. He would expect that 70� of the
truck traffic would be entering and leaving the site between the
hours of 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.
Mr . A1 Quam, 3 99 - 7 3 rd Avenue AT . E., stated he did not have any
objection to the development. He stated his major concern was the
visibility of the proposed buildings to the residential area on the
north. He stated the existing buildings along 73rd Avenue, with
the setback and the trees, are almost invisible. He felt a
precedent has been set to reduce the visual impact as much as
possible. He stated the houses along 73rd Avenue are somewhat
higher so they are viewing this property from a much higher angle.
He would suggest that the berming along 73rd be high enough so the
buildings would not be visible from the residential homes.
Mr. Gerster stated it was their intention to put a 4 ft. berm along
the entire length of the property on 73rd Avenue.
Mr. Carlson stated they are planning to front the buildings on
73rd. They have the option of turning the buildings around,
�""� putting the service side of the buildings to the rear. Then the
visual impact to the neighbors becomes worse. It was their thought
that they should address part of the visual impact issue by making
sure the buildings are attractive, use some undulating landscaping,
in addition to trees.
Mr. Kondrick stated he would encourage the developer to keep some
uniformity to the buildings and keep them in earthtone colors to
minimize the visual impact.
Mr. Carlson stated he felt their guidelines did address that, and
they would be going with earthtones and muted colors.
Mr. Quam stated he just wanted them to consider reducing the visual
impact with more height in berming.
Mr. Ron Mattson,
boulevard between
trees planted on
in the boulevard
property.
7324 Symphony Street N.E., stated there is a
73rd and the 73rd Avenue Service drive which has
it. Maybe more sizeable trees could be planted
area that would soften the visual impact to the
Mr. Mattson stated many people think 73rd Avenue and the 73rd
Avenue Service Drive are a divided road, and it is a hazardous
situation. With more landscaping in the boulevard area, maybe that
^ would help this situation.
Mr. Betzold staff could certainly pursue this suggestion.
� PLANNING COMMISBION MEETINa. DECEMBER 7. 1988 - PAGE 9
Ms. Dacy stated it could be investigated from a maintenance
standpoint.
Mr. Ron Killian, 7301 Concerto Curve N.E., stated he does not live
directly across from this proposed development, but he does walk
around this area through Locke Park. He stated he does not object
to this development. He liked the way the property would be
platted into smaller lots. He would like to see more green space
in this area to give 73rd Avenue more of a woods-type appearance.
Mr. Killian stated that even though the normal truck traffic is
6:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m., it seems that many diesels are started at
4:00-5:00 a.m. just to get the motors warmed up. That would be a
good reason for fronting the buildings on 73rd Avenue. He would
also suggest one more ingress/egress going on to 73rd Avenue to
allow more stacking room on 73rd Avenue.
Mr. Quam stated he did not think berming and landscaping should be
done in the median. He wanted berming and landscaping to be done
along the property on 73rd Avenue.
Ms. Dacy stated that within the setback area, a combination of
�, berming and landscaping can be installed, such that the 6-8 foot
high screening suggested by Mr. Quam can be achieved.
�,
MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba, to close the public
hearing at 8:55 p.m.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Saba stated he felt this was a well planned development. He
stated Northco has attempted to work with the neighbors and to do
a good job of landscaping. He stated he had no objection to the
development.
Mr. Kondrick stated he agreed. For the most part, Northco has done
its best to address the concerns of both the City and the
neighbors. He stated the two things he was most concerned about
was: (1) traffic south on the University Avenue Service Drive to
69th Avenue/University Avenue; (2) building uniformity. He, too,
would recommend approval of the preliminary plat.
Ms. Sherek stated she did sympathize with the neighbors with homes
directly across the street, because this is a nice wooded area.
Unfortunately, it is also a nice developable piece of property.
She stated she did like the plan that has been presented, and she
liked the proposal to break the property down into smaller lots.
She definitely would object to a large "Onan-type" industrial
development.
� PLANNINa COMMI88ION MEETING. DECEMBER 7, 1988 - PAGE 10
Mr. Barna stated he also would must rather see smaller broken up
planned development than a large development. It certainly
softened the impact on the neighborhood.
Mr. Betzold stated he would like to commend ATorthco on the time
spent with the neighbors in soliciting their input before appearing
before the Planning Commission. He stated this certainly gives the
City an indication of a quality development. The Planning
Commission and the City certainly appreciated Northco's efforts.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Barna, to recommend to City
Council approval of preliminary plat, P.S. #88-02, Northco Business
Park, by Fridley Business Center Partnership c/o Northco
Corporation: Being a replat of Tracts A and B, Registered Land
Survey No. 6, and Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 78, generally
located at 500 - 73rd Avenue N.E., with the following stipulations:
1. A development agreement be executed between the petitioner and
the City Council which includes, but is not limited to:
A. Design criteria
B. Landscape maintenance
C. Tree preservation
� D. Street and utility improvements
2. A storm drainage plan which either encompasses a comprehensive
drainage plan or individual drainage plans for each lot shall
be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit.
3. The developer shall petition the City to construct and improve
the necessary roadways and utilities in order to provide the
adequate infrastructure to support the development.
4. Access from 73rd Avenue shall be limited to one driveway.
5. Access from 71st Avenue shall be limited to four driveways.
6. The necessary joint driveway/parking easements shall be
executed for Lots 5, 6 and 7 and Lots 7 and 8, Block 2.
7. A revised preliminary plat providing adequate right-of-way at
the intersections shall be submitted to the Public Works
Department for review prior to preliminary plat review before
the City Council.
8. The developer shall submit a proposed plan for driveway access
at the curve of the proposed street for Public Works
Department review and approval prior to preliminary plat
� review before the City Council.
�
,—�
PLANNINa COMMI88ION MEETINa, DECEMBER 7, 1988 PAGE 11
Mr. Betzold stated this item would go to City Council on December
19, 1988.
2, REVIEW 1989 WORKPLAN:
Ms. Dacy stated that in addition to the 11 items established for
consideration by the Planning Commission in April 1987, staff is
recommending to add two more items:
1. The Urban Design Standard Book
2. Revision of the Subdivision Ordinance
Ms. Dacy stated that based on City Council action, a third item
would be a review of Light Rail Transit (LRT) routes and proposed
LRT stations. City Council will be discussing this on Monday
night, December 12.
Mr. Dahlberg stated that the article in the December 7th Fridley
Focus on Light Rail Transit routes stated that, "According to the
Comprehensive Plan, the northeast corridor system including a
selection between University and Central routes should be selected
by the end of December. A feasibility and implementation plan
would then be defined by mid-June."
Mr. Dahlberg stated, personally, he felt there was a need for the
Planning Commission to become involved rather quickly. He stated
he has already discussed this with Mr. Robertson, and he thought,
to date, the decision making process has not involved any of the
planning staff in any of the communities that will be affected by
this corridor selection. He felt it was important to have a lot
of involvement in what this impact is going to be on the City of
Fridley.
Mr. Dahlberg stasted
was a third corridor
Northern Rail, but h
recent publications.
he was also under the impression that there
under consideration, the existing Burlington
e had not seen any information about that in
Mr. Dahlberg stated the Anoka County Committee and representatives
of the Hennepin County Authority and BRW are having a public
meeting on December 12, 1988, in the Council Chambers at Columbia
Heights City Hall. That meeting is primarily for the City of
Columbia Heights, but he would hope either the City of Fridley
could do something similar to that or participate in that meeting.
Mr. Dahlberg stated he was specifically concerned that the
representation from Fridley has primarily been from an engineering
� and technical standpoint and not from a planning standpoint, and
he was a little afraid of what is going to happen.
� PLANNINa COMMI88ION MEETING, DECEMBER 7, 1988 - PAG$ 12
Mr. Saba stated he agreed with Mr. Dahlberg.
Mr. Dahlberg asked if there was a way the Planning Commission could
express in the form of some kind of objection through the City
Council to the Anoka County Rail Authority that they feel that a
decision cannot be made as quickly as the Rail Authority would
like, and that the City of Fridley would like the decision delayed
until the City has had an opportunity to do some planning and some
further investigation on the impact to the City of Fridley, and be
able to pass on a recommendation from the City to the Rail
Authority.
Ms. Dacy stated she would pass on the concerns expressed by the
Commission to Mr. Jock Robertson so these comments could be
incorporated into a memo to the City Council for their Monday
meeting.
MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Mr. Saba, that the City
Planning Staff, in conjunction with the Planning Commission, be
actively involved in the analysis and selection of the proposed LRT
corridor through the City of Fridley.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Dahlberg stated he would like to ask staff to look at and at
least do some preliminary investigation into the possibility of
creating a design review committee, not as a separate entity of the
Planning Commission, but as a sub-committee of the Planning
Commission. The Planning Commission functions as a body that
reviews projects in order to save the City Council time.
Similarly, the design review committee might save the Planning
Commission some time by reviewing projects before the meeting.
Ms. Castle stated part of the Urban Design Standards includes a
design review that would be done by staff so she did not know how
that would affect Mr. Dahlberg's suggestion.
Ms. Sherek stated she liked the idea of design review, but it
probably would be a duplicate of what staff already does. Maybe
what the Planning Commission should do is just ask staff not to
bring any packages to the Planning Commission unless the petitioner
is completely prepared and everything is complete--that the
Planning Commission will not accept any incomplete packages.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to approve the
workplan as amended:
1. Urban Design Standards Notebook
^ 2. Inventory vacant land
3. Develop Solid Waste Policy
4. Consider Systematic Code Enforcement
!'"1
�'1
PLANNINd COMMI88ION MEETINa, DECEMBER 7, 1988 PAGE 13
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Revise various Zoning Ordinances to improve code
enforcement (trash enclosures, parking, and home
occupation)
Update Comprehensive Plan
Revise Subdivision Ordinance
Review of Light Rail Transit routes and proposed LRT
stations
Consideration of Planning Commission Design Review
Committee
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
3. STATUS OF DECEMBER 21, 1988, PLANNING COMMISSIOAT MEETING:
Ms. Dacy stated there was one application for the December 21
Planning Commission meeting, and that was for a special use permit
at 7267 Commerce Circle West N.E. by Pioneer Concepts in order to
vacate the building in which they are currently located.
4. RECEIVE OCTOBER 18. 1988, JOINT ENVIRONMENTAL 4UALITY
COMMISSIONLENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the
October 18, 1988, Joint Environmental Quality Commission/Energy
Commission minutes.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
5, RECEIVE NOVEMBER 7, 1988, PARKS & RECREATIOAT COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to receive the
November 7, 1988, Parks & Recreation Commission minutes.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
6. RECEIVE NOVEMBER 10 1988 HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to receive the
November 10, 1988, Housing & Redevelopment Authority minutes.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ADJOURNMENT:
� MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to adjourn the meeting.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Betzold declared the
� PLANNINa COMMI88ION MEETINa, DECEMHER 7. 1988 - PAGB 14
December 7, 1988, Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 9:20
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
, �a
y Saba
Rec rding Secretary
�
�"�
�
�'��� . �
� `
� �^ _ _
,�� . � / ��� .
l
��'
Ge��'3'�
%�/� (��� ����
l�oe�� �s��
i��G� b� � c�-����
��N ���s��-
,�r�1 ��cu�
� �
����r�/
��-
�� ���
�.i� �CiL���4�
� �
�- ��� �ieG�/��T�
�O��c� �r�
��� �S� t��i • �. l�%���
/��/� �'���'� ��' 0'%LS
y�o�� � �� ��i ����-�� �� ��� �
7 3� y� S y,��y s� �-� t���d ��.� �5^ �� � i
�� �- �3,i.�c 5 35� ���� �, z��.a e��c� ��yiG �
l�� ^3r'=��„< S, ('`/�/�1s� �°��Z`��—�se����c ���:
� � ��.-� �� ' �� �,, `a�i.
�c�..�� —�
3 �' �' i 3 �� . ,/�� /�� , .�����r, �,U
�� l ��"O �� /U� J � 1.�L��l ��C1. `����Z