The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 07/27/1994 - 6936:� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WEDNE�DAY, JIILY 27, 1994 7:30 P.M. PUBLIC COPY � �. ,� City of Fridley A G E N D A PLANNING CONIlKISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY, JULY 27, 1994 7:30 P.M. LOCATION: Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. CALL TO ORDER• ROLL CALL• APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: July 13, 1994 PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SP #94- 08, BY WARREN PAULSON: Per Section 205.09.01.C.(9) of Fridley City Code, to allow the expansion of a motel in the R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling District, on Lots 5, 6, and 7, Block 1, Valley View Manor, the same being 6881 Highway 65 N.E. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 21. 1994 �^�, RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 12. 1994 OTHER BUSINESS• � R � . ;� , ' ' . . : . CITY. OF FRIDLEY � - . . . . .. . . , • .. • .. � : . ' • 'PLANNING �COMMISSION •MEETtNG, � •JULY ' 13; '� 19'94 � . • . ' . • � ' • CALL TO ORDER: �� .� �.Chairperson Newxaan� aa�.�led �the •July .13,';�1994, $l�nning. �ox�gi,issiQ�.� � � � � to order at `7�:30� p.m. � � � � � � � � ' ' � � � ROLL CALL' Members:Present: Dave Newman, Dave Kondrick, LeRoy•Oquist,�. Brad Sielaff, Connie Modig � Members Absent: Diane Savage, Dean Saba others�Present: � Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning�Assistant .• Tom�Wacholz, Opus CorpQration " � : ... .. .. . . _ . � . . Michele.. Fost,er, Opus Corporation, . ". ' �. APPROVAL OF JUNE 29, 1994, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded�by Mr. Sielaff,: to approve the. June 29, 1994, Planning Commission minutes as written. !"� IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 1. LOT SPLIT REOUEST. L.S. #94-02. BY MURPHY WAREHOUSE COMPANY: To split property into two separate parcels generally located at 48th Avenue and Main Street. The legal descriptions for the two lots are as follows: Parcel A: The south 1025.22 feet of Lot 2, Auditor's Subdivision No. 79, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the south line of said Lot 2 and which lies easterly of a line parallel with and distant 511.00 feet easterly of, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the Burlington Northern Railroad Company (formerly Northern Pacific Railway Company) main track centerline, except the east 33.00 feet of said Lot 2. Parcel B: That part of Lot 2, Auditor's Subdivision No. 79, which lies north of the south 1025.22 feet of said Lot 2, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the south line of said Lot 2 and which lies easterly of a line parallel with and distant 511.00 feet easterly of, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the Burlington Northern Railroad � Company (formerly Northern Pacific Railway Company) w PLANNING COMMISSIdN�MEETING,'JIILY 13, 1994 PAGE 2� ^ : . � �,: . . ,. . ' •. ' . - - .. ' _ . • . . . , .. � . .. � . ; . . . . . main track centerline, except the�east 33.00 feet of said Lot 2. � Ms. N�cPherson stated the petitioner.for.the reque�t�is Murphy . . � . :- W��ehQuse:•Campariy�:�. ,:•Burlington•.1+Iorthern�Railra.ad-•-:(:BNR}.�is th� owner: The.�etitioner is represented b� Opus Corporation. The . lot split.request is for the property generally located.between � 47th and�49th Avenues and between Main Street and the BNR yards. � The property is vacant and is zoned �!-2, Heavy Industrial. The .� � property to the east is ail single family residential. � Ms. McPherson stated the total parcel measures 19.72 acres. The .petitioner is proposed to purchase 15.5 acres with the intent to construct a 2.65,000 squa�e foot warehouse. The lot sp].it as .� proposed would create two parcels. One is�the 15.5 acre parcel � to the south, and the remnant piece is 4.2 acres: The lot widths are 1318.9.3 and 29'3..7 fe.et= respectively. Both• lots exceed .the - - _ . minimum � lot . ar�ea� requiremen� � of ��1. 5 acres and the �minamum . � . . requirement of 150 feet. There is an active•Amoco fuel line alorig the southerly property,line and the�e is an MWCC sanitary .. sewer interceptor�along�the wes't property line.� � Ms. McPherson stated Anoka County has reviewed the proposed plans � as the property abuts Main Street which is a County road. Anoka County has requested a 67-foot drainage and utility easement be dedicated along the west right-of-way line or east property line of the subject parcel to be used.for stormwater ponding purposes in conjunction with the reconstr�iction of Main 5treet. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is intending to construct a 265,000 square foot warehouse on the property. The building measures 602 feet by 442 feet and will be 33 feet tall. It is to be constructed of precast concrete panels. There will be a railroad spur line along the west wall of the building. There will be loading docks on both the north and south sides of the building. There will also be entry drives on the north and south ends of the building. The spur line, as proposed, crosses the 4.22 acre parcel to the north. An access easement should be recorded over the spur line to allow access to the Murphy property. Ms. McPherson stated approximately 30 trucks per day are anticipated by the petitioner. Hours of operation are to be from 6:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. with a possibility of a second shift. There are a total of 28 docks, 14 on each the north and south sides. As proposed, the building meets the minimum distance requirements for setbacks and lot coverage of the M-2 district, including the 100 foot setback from the easterly property line which is across from the R-1 district. ,-� n �,� •. PLANNING COMMISSION MEBTING.;�'�_ JIILY_13 .�19h4 � ' • ' PAGE 3 ' .. , :, ...., :•. . ... . • ,.... .,'��•��... :• ,. ...'..�•:� •'•'.. .� Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner requires only 33� parking spaces for the employees proposed to'be at the warehouse. The � plan provides an additional 106 spaces as.proaf of pazking. The building is designed. �to be suk?-div�ded in the future �n�o snlal.�er •sgac�s ��.shouyd,`'�tY�e : petit��.one� choo.se �to= n �eloc�t� : to.• �notiier . � � . faciTity. The petitioner�did provide two re-use�scenarios�to � allow for increased.manufactu�ir�g and warehous��space and office space and estimated the possible number of parking on the site. Ms: McPherson stated; in terms�of drainage, stormwater drainage currently flows from northeast to southwest toward the BNR yards. The g-rading plan submitted by the petitioner reverses this flow from the northwest to the southeast discharging the water into the upgraded storm.sewer sgstem .in Main Street. The petiti:oner will be allowed to release storm water either at the predeveloped flow ra�e or 5 cubic feet per. second•, •whichever is less. •• Anoka � County is installing a,storinwater p�.pe because. the •existxng � sys�em is no� ad�equate �fio ha�dle � t3�e ��existing � flows along�:� main �:� street. Should the plan proposed by A�oka County fail to be realized, there�two options for the petitioner to discharge the stormwater to the west: � ... � 1. Stormwater would be piped to the e�cisting BNR stormwater !"'� systein located within the railyard. 2. The petitioner would install a new pipe along the west property line south to a municipal interceptor which then flows west to the Mississippi River. Ms. McPherson stated the parcel to north will also be allowed to discharge water into Main Street at 5 cubic feet per second or at the predeveloped rate, whichever is less. The petitioner submitted the calculations with the p�roposed grading and drainage plan. Scott Erickson has put together a two-page letter to Opus Corporation outlining 14 items which are required as part of his review of the grading and drainage plan. The stipulation should be added to the recommendation that the petitioner is to comply with the items in this letter dated July 13, 1994. Ms. McPherson stated the park dedication fee is required at the commercial rate of $.023 cents per square foot. The petitioner also submitted a landscape plan. The petitioner proposes to place the majority of the landscape materials along Main Street to buffer the residential property to the east and also to break up the mass of the building. The ordinance requires 265 trees (265,000 square feet divided by 1,000). The petitioner at this time is pr�oposing to plant 165 trees so, therefore, they are 100 trees short. The petitioner could increase the size of the trees �„� provided which would reduce the number of trees required by 25%. In that instance, only an additional 35 trees would then be . � 1994 ' .. � ' . ' PAGE 4 � , . $LANNIIdG COMMIS.SION �EETING, JII�LY 13. .. � , . � reguired. �Staff�has stipulated that the petitibner is'to revise the plan to either comply with the landscape ordinance or apply for a�rariance for-relief from the landscape requirements. . • � Ms : � McPh�rsor� �stated staff � �recominends app�oval of the� 'reqiiest �by ' . � - • the Planning Commission to the�City Council_with the following stipulations: � l.. The petitioner shall.dedicate a 67-foo� drainage.and. ut`ility easement along the east property line. 2. An access easement shall be recorded over the spur line on the vacant parcel. . 3. The owner shall notify�the Commuriity Development De�artment�if use of the bu'ilding c�anges from�a :• .� warehouse 'to a manufa�cturing � facility causing the' need . �. � �o� additional� parking. � � � . � � ' � � � � 4. The petitioner.shall pay a park dedication fee of �15�,529.14 at the time of building permit issuance. 5. The petitioner shall submit a revised plan in � compliance with the landscape ordinance requirements prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. The petitioner shall comply with the items in Mr. Erickson's letter dated July 13, 1994. Mr. Newman asked which parcel would be Parcel B. Ms. McPherson stated Parcel B would be the 4.22 acre parcel that is the remnant as a result of the lot split. This is the parcel to the north. Mr. Newman asked if these parcels would be separate. Ms. McPherson stated she thought this was BNR's intent. Mr. Sielaff asked, if deliveries and products are going to be leaving by rail, what is the need for the trucks. Ms. Dacy stated there is a variety of clients in the building. Some will be receiving and/or shipping by truck. Not all material will be using rails. Mr. Kondrick referred to the letter from Scott Erickson and asked if the representatives for the petitioner from Opus had also received a copy of this letter. 19 ,...� . � PLANNING COMMi$SION MEETING. � JULY- 13. 1�994 . . . . ' PAGE 5 � - .: . • .. .- . :�. .. � ...,' : : .. �. .. .::. ,•.. �. 1K�s. McPHerson'stated they �ad�received a copy this evening. Staff just received the letter in late afternoon. The points outlined in the letter are points which have been previously . discussed with.the petitioner. . � . �� Ms.�Foster; �Director of Real.�Estate-for Opus Corporatiori,�stated �� she and Mr. Wacholz., Project Manager for the Construction Div'ision of Opus Corporation, have been working with Murphy on this project. She has been�working with them on the land �• '�acquisi�ion and land�planning for�the� site:� THey are in general agreement with the staff report with the exception of the landscape requirement. With respect to that requirement, she provided background on how they approached the City's landscaping . ordinance. As they.understand.it, there are�two alternative � computations that�can be used within the�landscape ordinance - � one according to.the perimeter of the site and the other, and the greater �requirement:, . is accarding �to �the �square � footage of the � . . � bui].ding... �B�t using � the , per.im�te� . calcu,lation, they would . be � � � requirecl to provide 68 trees. In looking at the magnitude of the site and project and the importance of the Main Street front�age, � it was pretty apparent�that this would•not�be adequate � � .landscaping for the site.� On this particular site, they are � dealing with a very large building, a large amount of paved area, � a rail track along the west property line where clearly landscaping would serve no benefit. In addition, they.also have to incorporate a large ponding area on the site in order retain water before it goes into the County system. The alternative requirement of 265 trees they felt was not a reasonable requirement. They asked their landscape architect to prepare what they felt to be the best landscaping plan for the site given those constraints keeping in mind the most important was the Main Street frontage. She felt they have provided a very adequate landscape plan for the site. They have provided a number of evergreen trees to provide screening of the truck dock areas as well as to provide screening to neighbors across the street to help break up the length of the building. While they could provide 100 additional trees on the site, she is not convinced that this is a reasonable requirement given this particular project and the scale of the project. They are between the two standards. The square foot calculation is 265, the perimeter calculation is 68, and they are proposing 165. The plan proposed provides an improvement compared to other projects along Main Street and will provide a very well landscaped project to the neighbors across the street. That is the only issue they have to discuss. They just received the engineer's letter and, based on a quick review, she thought they were okay with those items at this point. After they have a chance to review these items in more, there may need to be further discussions. � Ms. Foster stated, with respect to the operation of the building, not all.of the materials that go into the warehouse will be PL.�NNING COMMI33ION.MEETING� JIILY 13, 1994 -PAGE 6� �� ' . � . . '• . ..� .. :.. , . . . . � _. � �. . .- - .. � : �- � • �-: . coming•by rail. Some will come in by rail and go out by truck, � some will come in by truck and go out by�truck. It will depend . � on the particular mix of pro3uct in the building. Given the.type of business, this will vary. � . � . . Nir. Kondrick asked if there were�.plans to berm�on the Mairi Street �� side of the building. . . Mr. Wacholz stated there are bernas at the corners to screen the dock areas. With the ponc�ing in the front to�retain�the water, there was not enough room to berm the front of the building. Ms. Foster stated they tried to develop a good landscape statement with the front. They plan to plant 165 trees so � � technically they are l00 short of the maximum interpretation of the ordinance.but 100 over the�minimum interpretati,on. With a bu.ilding,of this-.size,-the�number can get out of sync with what ... is e�ected ,for a . smal�er . building. . � . • � � � � � . .� • . . Ntr. Kondrick stated he had no problem with �the landscape..plan, as provided. Perhaps using larger trees would seexri like a good. compromise. � Mr. Sielaff asked if there was a minimum reguirement for trees in the code. Ms. McPherson stated the minimum size is 1.5 inches for ornamental trees, 2.5 inches for street trees, and 6 feet for conifers. The trees proposed are the minimum required by code. Mr. Newman asked if this required a variance. Ms. Dacy stated this is part of the code. A variance request would go to the Appeals Commission. She would suggest staff speak with petitioner about a larger tree standard. The petitioner is correct that the formula for a large building will require a lot of trees. This issue can be worked out with staff. Mr. Oquist asked staff to speak to the different interpretations and how they are applied. Ms. Dacy stated the intent of the ordinance is basically the bigger the building then there should then be a large number of trees to soften the impact. This is a very large building. While she agrees with the petitioners intent to put most of the landscaping on the north, east and west sides, there is additional room for additional trees. Ms. McPherson stated the calculation is that there shall be one tree for every 50 feet of lot line perimeter or one tree for 1,000 square feet of building area, whichever is greater. � , ..,-� PL�iNNING COMMI�83ION� MEETING,. JIILY 13; 1994 : ; PAGE 7 . . . ' : ' ' .,: .. .. .. . � . ' ' �. . . � . � . . . . � • . . - . . . . • . '.� 1Kr. Sielaff asked if�there was a difference in the number required when using larger trees as compared to smaller trees. Ms: Dacy.stated.ye�. The.total number of required o�erstory t�ees may,� be ; reduc.ed •b.y-: 3�2., tre� . for each� • �Ieciduou5 tre�� . �.. .. � �. . . . .. iaeasuring 3 inches or m�ore in.diameter or each coniferous�tree measuring 8.feet or over. . _ Mr. Kondrick stated he would like to see more big trees which could be pui in tYie�landscape plan. � Ms. Foster stated they would be open to that if there are areas where the trees should be larger. They do nat want to provide an excessive amount of landscaping whieh doesn't serve a real benefit for the�project and is an e�ense for Murphy Warehouse Company. . '. .•�.. Ms.: Da�cy.�. �tat:ed it. is up ,�o the.• peti;tionez...as. to. whether they .. want to apply for a variance. Staff is comfortable with the lot � split request. Staff would like to resolve the landscaping issue. If they want to proceed with the lot split request, they can proceed with a variance at a later time. ,--� Mr. Oquist stated they can indicate in their recommendation for the lot split to work out the landscape plan. Mr. Newman asked if the parcel to the south was occupied. Ms. McPherson stated she believed so. Mr. Oquist asked if the railroad spur went through the building. Ms. Foster stated yes. Mr. Sielaff asked who is the owner of the property. Ms. Foster stated BNR is the current owner. Murphy Warehouse Company will purchase the site from BNR and Mur�hy will own the building. Murphy Warehouse Company is a public warehousing company and provides warehouse space for other companies. They will not subdivide the space. Companies that contract with them are provided a space in the building and need to know they can move their product in and out of the building when they require. It is not like a multi-tenant building with separate spaces. Murphy's headquarters and main facility is in Minneapolis. They have a facility in Roseville and lease space in Fridley. This will allow them to own and have product in their own building. Mr. Oquist asked how many people would work there. � PLANNING COMM�SSION MEETIN�. JIILY 13. 19�4'• . PAGE 8. Ms: Foster stated approximately 20-25 employees would be at�the site. They do have some seasonal tenants so there are times when there are.more people in the building. At this time they have one sY�ift,� but .there••:could. �otentially be: two .sh.if�s. .� �. ... . ..• . . �-. � . . - ... .. .-. . . `. � . � - . . Ms. Dacy stated staff have worked with Murphy over the last�few months. They have done a lot of work to meet the ordinance requirements, especially in regards to the loading docks. Mr. Kondrick�asked what specific plans does Anoka County have for the upgrading of Main Street. Ms. Dacy stated the County is in the planning process right now. Dr.ainage is one issule and.the.bikeway/walkway is another issue, It is mostly for the storm sewer but she was not sure if it was to be widened.. � . �. i�IOTIbN �by Mr. �Kondrick;� seoonded�by� Mr. �Qqt�is��,• to ,recommend � approval of the lot split request, L.S. #94-02, by Murphy Warehouse•Company to split property into two separate parcels generally located at 48th Avenue and Main Street�. The legal � descriptions for the two lots are as follows: Parcel A: The� � south 1025.22 feet of Lot 2, Auditor's Subdivision No. 79, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the south line of said Lot 2 and which lies easterly of a line parallel with and distant 511.00 feet easterly of, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the Burlington Northern Railroad Company (formerly Northern Pacific Railway Company) main track centerline, except the east 33.00 feet of said Lot 2; and Parcel B: That part of Lot 2, Auditor's Subdivision No. 79, which lies north of the south 1025.22 feet of said Lot 2, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the south line of said Lot 2 and which lies easterly of a line parallel with and distant 511.00 feet easterly of, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the Burlington Northern Railroad Company (formerly Northern Pacific Railway Company) main track centerline, except the east 33.00 feet of said Lot 2; with the following stipulations: 1. 2. The petitioner shall dedicate a 67-foot drainage and utility easement along the east property line. An access easement shall be recorded over the spur line on the vacant parcel. 3. The owner shall notify the Community Development Department if use of the building changes from a warehouse to a manufacturing facility causing the need. for additional parking. r^'�, 4. The petitioner shall pay a park dedication fee of $15,529.14 at the time of building permit issuance. e , ;-� PLANNING �OMMISSION'MEETING. JIILY �13, 1994 PAGE 9 5. The petitioner shall submit a revised plan in compliance with the landscape ordinance requirements prior to issuance of a building permit or obtai�n a .. variance. . � 6.�� The petitioner shall comply with the�items in Mr: Erickson's le�ter dated July 13, 1994. Mr. Newman stated, in the landscape plan, they tried to do a nice job but six=foot trees i:n front of a 33-foot building does not screen. Going to a larger tree would add to the screening and reduce the number of trees required. He encouraged them to work with staff to see if they could work something out. He felt the unique hardship would be the-rail line to the rear of the property. This does appear to be a very well thought�out plan. .. IIPON A VOICE•VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSO.N NEAMAN DECI�ARED . '�HE MOTZON CARRI.ED .IINANIMOIISLY.�- . . . .: � , �� Ms. McPherson stated this item would be before the City Council on July 25. � - 2. RECEIVE THE MINLTTES OF THE PARKS.& RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 6. 1994 Mr. Kondrick stated of particular interest is the request to name a City park in honor of Mr. John Gargaro. Mr. Gargaro was not only a member of the Commission but also very active in the community. The Lions Club has also submitted a proposal to rename a park and have e�ressed a wish to place a memorial at their expense. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to receive the minutes of the Parks & Recreation Commission meeting of June 6, 1994. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 3. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING OF JUNE 22. 1994 MOTION by Ms. Modig, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to receive the minutes of the Housing & Redevelopment Authority meeting of June 22, 1994. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPER30N NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOQSLY. 0 PLANNING COMMIBSION MEETING, JIILY 13, 1994 PAGE 10 ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to adjourn the meeting.• � . . � UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED�AND THE �IJLY 13, 1994, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:16 P.M. Respectful�ly submitted, , � I.�bZ�'1 ' � ��.� Lavonn Cooper � Recording Secretary %"1 ;'-c. �- � _ . i ,� S I G N- IN S H E E T . Wednesday, July 13, 1994 • ' PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, ' � Name Address/Business � ��' ' � �' =vlS <<� i �/'�1/ . , P IQO .;;, Ze .✓ . � E . %�/7"� LZ%L �'fc%L � �i�✓�✓Eri..J„G� ; MiJ 3S3 `j 3 . . . n � K.f!/ � � . /� �. . - , .. . STAFF REPO.RT �� Corzi:n�:u��,t� � D:��elopment�,D�epartment �� .. ' ' .Appcals�Coitiiiiission. Daf� • '� • � • .' . . � � . . _ . . , . . . • P�anraing Co�nini'ssion Date : `�' .��Y.y � 23 , 19�4 ' .. � . City Council Datc � � � �APPLICAT�ON' NQMHER: � : ' . . . � . . Special Use Permit,.SP #94-08 H Warren Paulson LOCA�TION3� � . . ' . . . '� . .. �. 6881 High�ray. 65. N: E. ;•.loca�ted..iri th�� northeas.t� �GOx'ner of. the •� �. . � intersection of Hig`hway� �65� arid 68th Avenue: ` ' ' � � � REOIIE3T•: 0 To allow the expansion of a motel in an R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling district at 6881 Highway 65 N.E. ANALYSIS• Located on the property is a 14 unit motel, motel office, and living quarters. The motel office and living quarters are located on the southerly portion of the building. The motel is located along the east property line in a north/south orientation. The office and living quarters are perpendicular to the motel. The petitioner is proposing to construct a 36 ft. by 48 ft. two-story addition perpendicular to the motel at its north end. The east wall of the addition abuts the west face of the existing building. The property is zoned R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling. Motels are.permitted as a special use. The petitioner is requesting the special use permit at this time in order to allow expansion of the existing motel facility. History The Sunliner Motel, as it was once known, was built in 1960. At that same time, the City approved both the building permit for the structure and dwelling unit/office combinatiori. The City also approved a sign permit which allowed a 12' x 8' free- standing sign adjacent to the Highway 65 right-of-way. In May of 1965, the motel was severely damaged by a tornado and was reconstructed in July of 1966. In 1968, the owners of the motel � ^ . �Staff Report ' . : . �� :sP�'#94=�0�,- b.y :�rl.a'rr•�n. •Pauison�.. � • . � . Page" 2 • . . �.. . . : . '. . - .. z �• �- •�..'. asked the City Council for consideration of a privacy. fence as • opposed •tQ the landscaped separation that t�as required as. � a•.•. ' �� stipulation. o� t2ie �prigirial appro'vai ..' In �uly of .,1.968; �� the Ci:ty Council approved a six foot high redwoo.d.fence to be constructed along the eastern. property. l�ine�,. and �that .fence was� to also extend along the northern edge of the property line to a point equal to the front of.the motel complex. The motel was re-roofed in 1973 and in October of 1982, a variance request was received by the City in which the petitioner asked to minimize the setback distance on the southwest corner of the complex to add a vestibule entry, and also to add a 26' x 10' deck. The variance requests ��aere � approved, and . in March of �198°3 ,'� th�e vesti,bule a�d - - ,deck perm�i,ts �zere issued and � the constructed �was c.o�nplete�l.- • . ' ; In March of 1987,, a• �.igri .pe�m�t was• gran�ed aYlvwing�� 84:. .sqi�aze � � � ��eet� ��r �the �free-staridirig sign. • '�he sc�tiare. �foot. dimens�air.��aas`. to replace the origin�l 96��squar•e foot that later evolved into a ". :�150 foot square foot free=standing�sign. �The free=standing 5ign ��was once again visited in 1992 when a variance�was requested by the petitioner to.allow reconstruction of the 84�square foot sign. A stipulation was placed on the sign at that time, that the sign face area would•not exceed 80 square feet. That variance was approved. Variances In 1994, the petitioner asked €or consideration of four variances and a special use permit to allow expansion of the motel facility within the R-3 district. The Appeals Commission heard the request for four variances at their regularly scheduled meeting on July 12, 1994. Those variances included: 1. To reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 10 feet. [This is an existing condition, not a result of the new structure.] 2. To reduce the side corner setback from 35 feet to 30.33 feet. [This variance request is related to the new construction and proximity to the property line adjacent to Highway 65.] 3. 4. To reduce the rear yard setback from 40 feet to 19.44 feet. [Abutting Rice Creek.] To improve vehicle turning movements by reducing the parking setback from 20 feet to 18 feet. � ^ � � Staf� Report • � � . . . � � � . ' . . , ` � , S� •#9q-08`, .by. Warren �P`aulson• � � •. . . � • . • . � . : . . . :' . ' . . • ' . : � � � Page 3 ' : . . � • . . �, - .. � . � . . . ' . . ' . . • • . : . • . . ' . �. . : � : . • . - - The Appeals Commission.voted unanimously to recommer�d approval of . � the variance requests. S�taff's reco��dation�to �he.City�• . � . Council. would, be �o coneur with.�the' i�,ppeals �Commi'ss,ion a.ctiom. ' � . Staff. � has worked with . the developer . to• determine w�i�at�� the .�.� _. aesthetic elements of this addition will include. The developer indicated that the addition will be two-story from the existing grade with a lower walk-out level beneath the two-s'tory addition. The total number of motel units to be added is nine. There will be three units per floor, and the stairway to the lower walk-out level and upper level will be on the exterior of the building. The developer indicated�that.the walk-aut:level evolved f.r•om poor soil conditions on the �orth�af the ex'istirig inotel�.facility. A� d"et�x-mination was �made , from • a feasibil,it� s�andpoint that. ;it ,�� .: would� be more. �p�rao'tical to�� compa�t� the�. soil�� and biii:ld. a��• .��.�� foundation rather than�replacing al�l the soil required for the .. original two-st_ory design: � � � � Transportation Issues � The transportation issues related to this proposal include the on-site parking for the facility, on-street traffic issues including the desire to have a stop sign at 68th Avenue from the parking lot, and also the request by residents to have a controlled intersection with a traffic signal at the intersection of 68th Avenue and Highway 65. In regards to parking, staff has evaluated that the code requirements for parking would require one parking stall per unit in the motel facility. The total number of motel units is 23, and the office would be considered 24. At one stall per unit plus one additional stall for every four units, the requirement is 30.parking stalls for this facility. The developer's proposal exceed this code requirement by five stalls. The expansion of the parking lot relates to the turning movements within the parking area. City code requires a driving aisle width of 25 feet for two-way traffic. There is sufficient room for a standard stall depth, 25 feet of driving aisle and parallel parking along the curb. There has been some concern about the proximity of the driveway to the intersection of 68th Avenue and Highway.65. Although this an existing driveway situation and the additional units will not compound the problem, with the exception of a few additional daily trips, the concern could be addressed by controlling the traffic onto 68th Avenue with a stop sign installed by the motel � as part of their parking improvements. That �top sign would face internally to the parking lot and would require that cars stop J Staff . Report � '- � • � ' � . . � .�._: • . . : � S.P�� #94-0�8�,.� by.3�1'azren. Paulson.. . � • . .. . : - . .. . • . • ... . .. � . . . : Page �4� • . . • - : �. . ' • • . ' .� ' . .. . : . . . � : . .. . . � - � • ' � . . � L " . . . ' . . : � ' . . - before entering 68th Avenue. ��In ,regards� �to the controlTed intersection, st�p lights at :State�� . � highways are installed iri aecordance with a manual that the State uses to evaluate need.�for .controlled intersections.. �Tl�ere are .il .. �- 13� different areas that are evaluated as part�of a traffic study for an intersection such as this. It is our Public Works . Director's opinion that this�intersection would not meet the warrants necessary for installation of a traffic signal. RECOMMENDATION/STIPIILATIONS: .� .•.�•Staff recommends that if the Commission chooses to•recommend ..� ' approval of this spe�ial use permit request.in order to:expand �� - •. � the existing.� mot�l � facility . in an R-3 district, t�ie. follow�i�ng . . � .. st�ipui2ltibris be:.teco�amended: -: . . : .. . : , .. . . : � . . . . 1. A stop sigr� shall be�installed by the developer�at the point where tYie parking lot drive enters orito 68tYi Avenue. �� The sign would.be the cost and responsibility of the motel. 2. The addition shall be built with an architectural character � consistent with the character of the existing motel complex. 3. No windows shall be.placed on the second story of the east side of the building addition. . 4. The parking lot shall be re-striped to identify the 35 parking spaces indicated by the petitioner's site plan. 5. The new parking surface shall include curb and gutter around the expanded parking perimeter. The curb and gutter is to be concrete and of a staff-approved design. 6. Erosion control fencing shall be installed during construction to assure no construction-related soil is carried into Rice Creek or adjacent landscape. 7. Rip-rap erosion control shall be installed at the base of the roof dra�n and at the point where the parking lot swale empties surface water onto the landscaped portion of the site. 8. All landscape areas shall be restored. 9. Although not specifically required by Code, staff suggests that the three 20" oaks removed by construction be replaced by three 2 1/2" oaks in an alternate location on the site. ^ . ,'r"'�: . . � . . . � � � � ME 1riORA1�TI��TM -� � . � � � . � � TO: � � ` Michele McPhersora; Planning Assistant � � � PW94245 ' � � FROM: Scott Erickson; Assistant Public Works Director�� DATE: July 15, 1994 SUBJECT: . Drainage and Grading Review of 6881 Highway 65 NE Building Addition and . . � � � � Parkir�g Lot Expansion � � � � � � � � �The following comments pertain to the drainage and grading review for the building addition. -� and parking lot expansion for 6881 Highway 65 NE. � � .� 1. Install concrete curb arrd gutter around the exterior of the parking lot. ,� . 2. Provide erosion control fencing around the building addition area and along the northerly part of the parking lot. 3. Install rock rip-rap at the bituminous swale for the parking lot storm water outlet and . at the outlet of any roof drains of the proposed building.addition. 4. Additional comments may be forthcoming pending further review or changes to the plan. SE:cz � !� . �.. � i �� - .�. � . � � �.� � . ..� . . � . .. �s�' �,y o : T;.ss . �.s. :: . . . : . � . .:. : � .: : � � � � . � ... '.. : ��t: �.��' rrY fi�? .'(!t)' �:� .. • ' :��.� (r�: �.� s�� iw.�s .��; . . ' ' . .a /� � ; '.:�o' • . . .. ' i.as.. � • .:•,� ' • o� ... •(�i 9ti : � ' . 1 � • •' � \ P( I � � •......... ' e� IlfO o� ' . . ' ' � ' L� n � -�j 9i10 . ......• , � � . ; ' . e � � 3 /N) �dJ I : . . . i . � • !� . �2; ,� � I °� � � • . � • . . fioao'� • • rY)' ' . •' � y . - : �o ,--- • . i /o! � l2.. � � ;�, � le � 24! � 19 • � . ` �rj o ' , i '^ 7 �-1 �� ;�. ; /n> . . �- 1,�; . . . .. . ,a o � �F � � 1 , ��^� 2673 ��6� .35 � . u /•7,f41 r �^ 6� ' M /1?3S a•�n.,N s �� 4JB ;; , /� (�'� 0 6� o � , ..o � . : � �, . . ,�� . . . 6.. b � o , �� . a�17c+sii . —6 ? T�" b i � • /2 a� .j' '• . b _ , o . ey � � �' ' , ' / d' � 1 � . I , /o . '� . 4 / o. �� ` � •E�ff � . . ' . .N � o ; n�68TH AV.E. •�� . �.'� ?� �•81.i . • ,� . /� /1 • i 1 � �`o � . . ; : .1 � . _ � . � - B . • �� . B . B : . . -3ve• -(`" . !%. . .. .. . . . 5 (', m � N . . c: O � °� • �'f��. . �� . . ' � ` f � (�� • ^ /)4% . �2''� a . — • ' 30o t/ . E��M 'I ` i , , ��, � ��j Z I� �� g. /5� /6 /7'' q �2>> iu� M . ti o i �`•.. . ._ . � .-.: 'I� � ' '- Z ��- 3.� ; ' ~ �° .: � �CHANNEL ROAD �°' � a _ c�� _ • J z°�F OU.=c."�a9.asO.YE •;f 6GCZl B�� RfZf !.7 71. t1! . a � . .� � �.,� � � 2s4.1I � �P�� , �I) 0 w w ��% � g m Z �� ' /4s) � �fL) o � � . � � dore,c 5 � --- . � .�a o , RS � l�� ,� �� <_� � . � -- _�s,. ;o - Q ' NA � ; - -� � j�l �B,- �� 4 J. �48 � � � � I � D p. o � �8 . �9 0 �+ �3 � �4 � ��.� � w � M � � � �� " , m � � �l . �� , � 4 K , � . a � o, n - � o 0 o y . Z O , �; �So) m c a ,� � � os � o Z ;� � �� e�r 9&�,- gBS 4 L a � � '` �� .6Q bE� <iJf3 � `'- �'c° y' � e. 1 a � ue y.. 6�� °68 T ; o- $ m t 2� � o , � AI �B ^ •_ � �e,�.-4 — — � � • - 85.19 ti � B�c3o o Bs.i9 n � 99� b � 1♦ � ' � : '0 301.= 33-�J :60 - � � 6B�4tG '� . � �09� �� Q � �h � . c'��ri � � m ?' {2,,.`_ o = z„ �_ 4 � �f � a �LS� � � /f�ta Z • �I � iSi �2� �� I / . � • m � `�9 �m Z �w � - _ �y� 5 j 5 E � 0 „�s � "d ,�, ��' C4rI ✓. y de%M �� ..f � 4 0 ; , _ 0 6 ' s �r�� « 34) " (�:, %1 � / 1 z 0�8ee Ca.,/rzc f�y �'o. ----� . � � t � � �z .as .� � L31 '° f P°l , _ � , � �ze� 6 ,o, � � t�� f 3' F' _ � 5A "` �8 �3 c,v � L ��w.��!�r �.�PonnB�/�it ,:1ram �;� W _ �.s.rs -- o tt'� � � 0 9� z „ . � � .l - - , 1 .� O � �,' .iat � l.� 1 ' . LOC/4TION MAP . ,r �. � .'.�� MI�ESOTA +J � .. � i �: � 0 z . . . .� . � .1��:. � ....T . +... �� .. • .... . . . . �. . �. . . . p,. . � RQDo' '' ',� •, • .....�... , �.� . . 1� ,�:� .B.I . •.. . ��. TO • • • N T ��• ' � � • ♦ • • • t � O / • • • �'///% NSFER �; �//��///� � .. �/ . . �: �. � . Rq�� .. .. .. - .�.:.y �: - �-, . } - : '°�' ` . . . �, Q W . � � �''� `w °-� 3 z . E., ' f = .W . � � �`. .` ;� ° � c� > �� a �, �'. _ .�L � -. '. � �, �- � � t I i�,r�-�- . � � �,� �-�r '�r'`�- 1 L ;� � �, � :� � � _ .� • ' �;; . -4� - G"" ,.� ,4 � . \ L, . U� J h F � r Y ��p, t c ^I .• � �w�' � � cr` . 3�r� � � �. , o� c ? k,� 3 -�� ` • � � '��" f ib /7 /B �� lo F- • � � � � � _ - - � �W • � _' - • '(ract � a '-� � j �� g (� Z � �� '�• � • E '// � / b �, • • o `• ` '�j� , V'!� ' c/f . A E 4 W i1 • 7 ' �. : ° r� � -i �+, P�EEK t Z��• H.AVEQ �� C I � f�;� ;. � • � . . � ,,, .. ` , , c� 1 �f • W . • u � _ � 4 � , ' �` 1C y � I l9 • L � Q f '6 /7 1 � � j' `- � {W " � . �a ��9 /B •� • N • �- � t• f' - `� ;�.,� 'j � ti ' 9 � ,—, B. , �.-f I RIC ��1C`REEK ��+ , o; ' 6 • �� • • • �O • 239 �� ' P4RK � � F io i6 , � , 1 'y� } /� �� i� ' ic Ii /S i%` � i �t•~�� i �ii� I�C7 ; 7T :13 It 4 �: Q'�j � ` ,I''�,��f�t/' CI' } g � - -� • � � � � �. , • � � p � ` i� 0 9 /S i1 /�f /� t, • � • � � . q •c �.v 1 � �� ` • i4 i.r �j iI • • � 4 •N 4 -f � � � • � f` • • ----=- ��}. • • 'N ' 4 • � " itFS�c C C:.: � 2 4 ; � � - _ . 3 . s� f ' � C� .'f . �I � DISTRICT LEGEND � 5 . d � • • �• R-1 ONE FAMILY OWO'S ❑ Y-7 110XT INDUSTHIAL ❑ $�� W . V � • t. � q-1 TWO F�MILY DW6'S ❑ Y-2 HEAVYINOUSTHIAI � � = d� U �-+ 6 � q-3 OEN. MUITIVLF OWQ'9 � PUD PLANNED�UNIT DHV. � '�•� • U� U ('4 �yJ q-1 MOBILE XOME OnRR ❑ S-1 NYDF PANK NEIONBORHOOO ❑ f c - c .� � O ( Q ' 3- �0 YUBUC iAC�IITIE3 � 5-1 REDEVELOVMENT D19TXICT 0 o� ^,G `� C-1 LOCAI BUS�NESS � O-1 CAEEK 8 RIVEN GNF88RVATION Q :. �V - � 1,. � C-t OENEH4l BUStNE$5 "�� O-7 CHITICAI AREA � , %'0 C•A t W : �Q � � C-J GENER4l SMOP7ING d_� --- �- I— �3 z r . / C-N1 GENERS� OfFI�E ❑ v4CRTED STREETS � 'q ` _ � � /1 3 ZONING IIIIAP� /r J f /� �-�u�~'� �.i'Ji.. � • . ,— ... . • . • _ ._ • �' . �'�' r, ' �i r �17 .� .�'i: �j '� 5; .... , ' . . .. ' ' . � ' . . . ' � ' . • � . . • � . . � • . � � . . . ' ' _ ' " . . � . ' : • . - . �- . . . . . " , _ . .' • . . I . • i •, ' � . . � ' i. ' . • .I �a` � bce��`- WqC� . ��,�t e « jj G � "I�IaP.� � � � N,, l S-ra� �r.rf � STQ,,o I �hL.P T �- t `nl � � `✓ L ;� ! e � '� i. ? :� i 3. : i i i I � �� f \� r `c t ' l. ... . . �. , . � ; \ • � 1u � � ; � � ( \� � v� i �� `� ; � t � i �,Z'' (j L oc � W A:� � • � 2 UNITS OF LOWER FLOOR PLAN i� � �� _ ( - �e� . . � . .. . � �z�£��.. � . . . � � . : ... � . . .: .� .. . . . .. : .� . � _ � . `� � . . �.� � �. " �.� .. � �. . .�� .. . � .. � _� . � . .: . � � . � . � . . . . .. . • . ' • . • - O t1T $ , �r � � T A r d S �T o ' � DASo �„� �.. - ^Q ut � • . . . , -- . � . . o . Py�e • � p '( � S (t�tecy (��ttf� t�`i 1 ? �! 3 G�p�( gCV p�cD � � � y � � � . � ; ". V � . a . . Q: . • . . • • ? . .. �' . 3 'M1 4 ' . . • . . � . . � .. ! � - . � ` � � � . . . . . . . i� !I ' �. 0 . . (\r. • • ♦ 'x � . . Y � � _ . - GMp�� - �'Y . . - . : g.• . ' • � . �. .� ' '. • . . . • . ' • _ . • . . . . . • . . � �, � , ' . � � . h . p q :: � � � p`.n�Tcp't: GQe�ewsr,. . pGs u.. . . - � Y ' 'i � , , ' ; �.�- ' . . � 1JA►t � It�TUlhr GR�C�BwSii. ' Oc5 ►Z� � • . � . . Q � �� g �. � t \ '-� 3 - - o � � �f / 9 � e ✓ 3 � r 3 � I , �Qb� Qkce� QKGC�c _.� � � �e� 3�� ,� I 3 G�A'�} � � J i u t ' -� b o U oy Gato��s:n Dc�6 6 k N A `�v oo �^' �l � � � � � � aS�� - `� I ---- -- � L r ' � -------` C � a d � r�oWPd.�--�j-e',L— � � n � i I�i �� ` b � �� y `� � V � • {�� ' I � i � Q�ec•/ � � ? ay c9 '� ( + �� 'i i . t �J(�Y:•�' �'Hi � l � { i � � � ! � �� i� . � j ^ M1q ��( � �. � /\ t �� ! � . uT; �_�. � 7 �,�- s t ;1, -� � �; � � ^`,� �.� p �� c� '''�`'' Ue� o f�'` � f Fr-�,'�`'°J S�P�,..- ,,�..: GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN . � � yl r i � — a� . ----� . � . � . . . � ..i ,. � . . : � . � . �. . .. � ' � 'j��.r/f. '• . .' ; .. .. . . •.. ' • .- .. '-'• '• . - , � : . . .. . /g . . . . . . Z- ., p� � � . \` �L . . �•"� .`�. . . . .. Y . . .. �� T h�r �] 1 P �i � �p,n1 ij�D ��p u � 31 La � . i i ��.� �Y . �� 1 . . o� ,. ; .. } i . � . � � .. . . . �.. � � ' . ' 3y. . . . . � . .� .�: �� : � ' , i Y;. . . V 1%A`{ O�(�1Ci�� CA.e�cws. n OcS �� Q. U �p_` � ji,,r�w« ca<�•s.+; 'ncSK- � 3 a � � ,. � � v � j � .. �i t�g a �� r 3j b� i �' � J� �p �`.i � 3i `�p�� Gf� �� ; � �t b� � � �1�u D {L�tcNt• G4to[•tS.F pcya. ; V � �F -rah ��as � p� L �ke�� ?` • �; , i ti ` , � I k PLAN � �. . i . . - . - :;- - � .. ^ �� — -- -- _ � ��.. �'-- ` Lip _ �._..-�.4 — "� / w�tAr1�' . . .. - -�__._------r--'-. • ��- osv� �— � eez �e �„_�,... • : � r , ---"_" , - coi � --: ""''`— � u v, rrr+� ,�.....i �--.^"""r--__—.`� / % ' �' ._._ _. • . . . .�-�-- C/'�� „C� !L:-. t - .�+� * • � jj� �� 1 � � ^ � r�a��'__ ' � � = --------- � •' •. j� _______ ---�--- � _-_ _ _ _ sfl '------_ — . , _� . , . + __�--- � , - � �_ _�. . . , . � . $ _. ' . i }.�.. � �Q . . . � �^� lIO pLI OM'0�'W W! � 4t� _ 10y.T7 S - - . 1�!� --'�--�----- ��---�-- -^------- - ---- --- ---- ----�-- - --------------------- - ---___- ---�^ ---- - - "--------'--- � ...... : i • ,, � ' .� N090�1 *�...: :i�;. .. ', ' l i I � , � �.y i ' w.i \ t I. .... . .. .. / � �'---_�i_-__- --------=---" - ----"_--- -" -----�-------- -.�_ `;.. . :�:. .�� . DO ri+OTd'pr•r ' ,- -'-, NO9! .. � �__-�- ----- ----- - - __� -�. i psrwc Iq � � ' �`, • ' . �4�� Y0. YEASNOIO�I��W � �� ^d I/OQDI`INO�I'W ` // . 1 ^ , r ww .�+v i�t • '�. ' 1 _I ' Y. . y�f. �}TS�iR �� L�� . I �� 1 . � ' '� :� 1 li 1 � ~ • I i I � ' I � � ' � � \ �� . I 1� / / ,�Y :' � � i � ,,� �., � r. • y .. i, �a ii� . •, !° .1 .:/ Y /��, o � i . .�V � r.,�� 1� �� i r � ' '. •� � -- � -� i ��, �►� p �// , , J `� � I I •1' • °_•� I A - s.i .I � � r -=,.-�'�.�.e_�.._+.� -- -- - -� -T- `� � � I � i I' . � �� .� I ^ ^I I � I/ . �f � Qa � i ;>v� / � j / / —', � r � �� i r �� / � &� � �' ,' �, -- - � . � . .. � � , ---i- � � , i i, f. +��! ^� !•Y. _ a - ------� ------- - -------------------- --- -- ;{. - � �y_�. ` `-"� ��p /i %' j� I �, I 0 ' �oN � � I �� `� ` � ' 4 4y� o �$ •` N~ t \ �1 b 1 \\\ ' � ��/�// - � ` •� A / i r i I! �" �: ^i a i��'� ;� � � ,., �` 4 �4 . � 8� 1\�� :3 �3 /��.hyp/// I I � �. � ! ' ' � •� � ea � \3"j ' +�a I . • F � UrSrnvG ORAlNICE � � � �� 1 � � . � g Yr ' C� n �I � . �� Sr 0�3��t F � � ,0. � � � � � L� ��,^� �__� �I � �t � _-.�_ �.� � / � `,�`� •� I �� `�� `x�� — : i � �— - � I • ' r r � - „a.,�� i � i ' Q � .�� I � • ' ' � �/___A"!'l___�____ �Y6 _11«_ _ _J-Or:'I!I _J_ \ -�•-- i-- � •; �I � 1 . .4� — .m,a,,:,- ---------- ,�. - - � � � p n ' I�� , • • j � � 1 I - :: :•: i ii -.. . .. . . "r � , t•l i. . .... I (!!•1 � T �� li � , � , ' i ----�.: . ` .�... � i y� .� � • ��rL.��'� ��.�_��._ �'a�� .��_��_��'� �� =�.� -_ �� _ N � �= _�� ,. J; , -v� ___"YT r�� Ia � � 'I �� - �y— .� -' - � � .; ^� i '. \' I .P � � l. '4 i "'� �� R� � �� , .. �� , � , ---1 =� I i �.:�' . . , • i ,1 � i �. � � �� ; � . ,,.�.n �j ' �t . �i� '"°°'°'°�o }�'` �� ` ' �. •., Y*__ i ma r I�• -\r --_ �`iov�m++�anYas -_ '��'"_ _____ {mc�s! n>=ccaca.�. aacc.nncan c n=n a�nx> �o c=�_ I \�. �.. �i < � � � ' � i i . • '• ! .. " � i Q� I � � I� �2. s__'��' �� 't/ ` ��_ � � � � "�� L �i �I/� `p� .. .. . .r ' ,,. �i � ' �y � y �r'..____f3-_X ______ ___r s';r__.___.s_T ;r_rr_�_ _______-�, r r__x_ _ .. ► . .Io . i� , \. I rrOAU� � ..� � J � a.wa v�u�w� � ' IY ; - I ` a � . 1 . • i 1 \ ` - 'i � • f3 oLA / � � i. � � � ICCCSSP4�N � i .. �, �' , S,•' �3 -1- �ave�Jr.�,i ��. �� Ncas'�rw �`_ l300 aIAI ' J� � L Y7Mpt � � -, 8 � '� \ . ` � ro9ese rui ' : • '.wt.» w[�s �aw7YAVr � � J�� 's- �:� T' � � � ' ' ' �' . N0�0'00'M Yf15 .'.N 011'07'E Vf�S 61.791 YE�$ � � I . n. I . . I � . \ . I I M 0�9'11'w WJS � / I . . � . � , � , ,< � �� • . ,�,i -. �'-----------'------�--------- ------------ ----------- ----I'� � J� , i ,.- � J, ..• i •'. I � . � . t i $ \, �. \ ` I • $•.' . . _� BUKOMiG SC2AQr � � � '/� 'Iy �; j�i . �_�„ , � (� '`� --- --i------ -- �-------^f - - = �s _ ,�eI 7; .,. i ' i � I • •� � . . �- {. ` -1�\ , ------ -� ------------------- ------- J'----- r-.��-jI --- R----------•-�------- _ ' I A , EI � 1 . � � � �I�I � � ---, , , �� ; �, � �- �� ;', . ! ' 1 '� . • �. � . � : ,. 3ic.a2 Pcar , � �� :" • ,,; � � j � NO'05�U"W PLA7 •.' 1G i� s �,^ �; �� , I , I I , � . . ' J09.966 MEAS ii� � a � . �' � �. � NO'J5'?7'W MEAS � d � o ' ' I�: � $ � �----------- ----.--------------- ------------------- ------------ �--� � �� '�--.. ," .. I � �•,.. : _ . .-... ._ ,�� . . � �. � : .. .-...... - .,, . � � .. � ' ��'�� .� -, � e I '- ' � '� ' • � � ' ' � #� ; i� � � 1 J •...... .. ' ' ..._.. .. ... . ... ,'[S:. � �. TIL::I � � � I I • ' •. ' . . �..____..—` . . ` . ' �_�� .�� . �.�.��___._��. _� I 1� II, I , � m� N�Q/S \ � � . � . — � •� ' � � ( • . . - . " ( -- — i ;w�-�� . —•_.._ —•- —•— —•—. —.— —.- _.— �.— _..__ —�— —�— —�— —•-� I• r . • �. • - . £nsnNC a' �tv sMm�wr sc�R � ° . � �� .:. �Y�� . .' ' �0 .� .��.�� . . . .�� . : . � . �.� � • .. � , . '. � .: � . . �� . , • , � .� s � . . • ' ' � �., ��. � . . .,� � � � . o Q � � .�: � o �� O N �' � � a � . r N �: � ��'�N �� A � Z a ' z4' �.� � � � .� �� .�: a� � $ " �� . � � . �. , $ �� t � � • � �. � . : � e � ' � �-. �� ' . . . • ;°c r _ tn ;�O p �Q o � a' O �� N �o g a� �. � � � �� o. � , a� � y t � � k. A �a g�� s °°a �� =o Q� O y� w � �': ,o�� 3 � � y gR 0 0� � �� n ` � ��go a y. t 0 0 � � :� � ,� � w � o g• � a o � a Q� 0 `�s � A " q _� 4 ;'� � . J p � � q � r O � 9 o � � � ti W � C Z � � \ Q a 0 V 0 � y ^� \ J CT �'l1 ''I � � Y ,i �Y� �� 1� 1 ' 1 1 J/ I' � /' � . —�.�� • � � . � �'��^- '�'== -`��i�i�` \'\. . . d ..�,� ��i;':"^ =��"' �-��\�� ` ' ' . � `� _. -' .%� 'i" i_-�� '�:�: �•,,.� . ; `.�`~ ` i /�/��.�� 1��i�\`�\�\ \ � � � � �..� �`i �' 1� �� .. \ \ ��i i�//� .` ..��;\` \ \ , �,\\ \ \��. � ^. . ' _ _i.r � �� ' \ 1 � � �.. \ �\� � \ � \ � � � . I � � . . ..._ .� �� • . � ^\`�l`� \ � \ � �\��1\ �. � ' � ' . � � . . . / ` � � � � � \ � � � ' �. � I ' � f . / ^� � � � � � \ � �,� "v ` � I . ' � '\� \ \ \ � � �\ � 0..�� \,� I I • . • �M �\ � � \ � $.'�i ,� . � � �' �' � I I . ' / ' �� \ \�\ �\\�\ �� \ .__.,-.. \\ ` -. / \` \\ • ..i ' ' / � (��\�� a��\� � . � =„ ` � . I . � � • .. . ' ' � ._ :' �Y� � • ..t... . / I � � � \ � \ ` ". _ . - � , � 1 �' � � .... ti . _ . �`: : ' ��' �.�•`: • � ti - ' •- • _`; �' ' : y 1 I � ,. . ,,.._�--. _ _ � , ` � . � . �i �.... . . f � V � � l � � � . \� ` — _ ,: � ` y � • .- � � �. ,. \ I . ( � �..., ' ./' - ' 1 � � � ` � '� � = = � �� `� \' �' - I I i'I 'f ! -. . � � � ' �. � \�•� ___ �:`-�\�\� •,`� � �� ,- . � I��.�•� � / r' � i l. �`� �\•�'� .� �� \\��\� �.y �""" � 1 � � I . ^��+. "1 �� — = � � . \ � . f ' ��' \ I I II � � � i� .. �' •. _ � f---'�'.�' � � I � ' j I i ,/ /i' _—.,�iii1. r�_ s1 �=� �;�� I ( il, l �� I i / ptr... �, _,�� ... \�`, I i i � �, I � } I � � r /' . � Q � +.r' .Y� '�`r � _,;� &'°;�1�i I I � � 1 � � � �iC� ��1 I . , � � , : . � / � ..:i ' ;� , �. . :1�1 , .. / � � + � � ; ' i ., + � � � ' _...... .__ —_ , , . . / , : � . .. / . � �1 � i ' � . �r �1 � — = _ —�--:_. --:_ - _ � ..._ .._.._.. _ _ . i ! ! C �� ' ��""� �f � � � --? � . .� _ ._. . i � �'� i ':� �°C ...A . �. ' ��, � � e„��... �— � I��'• ,� � t f► J f i ^ / ',$� ��r � � .,, g � � � �.a, � � �,', . ,. _J � , , � � ,-� ;, ..�r�� i , I ��I��.�!i ��i'. . �. �� _' 1� a�� I � I � 1 I.I.��'� '� / � � i. �, I� �I I I I � � �•I��► , . �i � � � � t �� I i' �' ' ; �� . ' ; � ' �I I i i � � I `, : . � �' t l �' � �°� . � / . �I ., I ' , � �� I � I , � ! I� �� J1 �� j; � _...�' ; ' i .' 1 \ I I; i l i' Q a I , �i� �; I� � : •' � 9 � � � �� r��; ' ��° , ' _" � � � `� I I � � ' ' � �� a ,I I � I � � , i i,, i., ,. � �. . � � j . �.1 �.� ► * � . � i i 1� � I � , I � I � j � I I �� t� `� .• . �y. 1 , �' .,� �i I � � � � ~ � �'' � I!., t, �, 1 � �Pi � � " 1 �� I� �H> I I I ! I � � �I /�, � � ° � I � -i , 1'f � ,„ , i • �,, � � �� I i � � I �i . � �� '�. j .r. �� I . � � � � � � � �� ! " � ; ' rt �;. � ;I .i 1 ! � "" i i : ► . L � . II � I � � ; � , � ii �� ,' % u� �q �,-1 ,-I� � I I � � i ; ,,• , ; �� , ! l 1 � i ;l.r` �� / � ' � � � � ��. . r .� � ; ?< � �� ' I� � I I � I ,.�� i��, �;' b � �' o II ;jl I j I ! I �', � f�, i�; o � o �I � �� I � ; i� , �f.�'�i � . � � ; i � '' ( � . a I � . �� ;�,, ; . � . g ��I I � I i i � �. I ii ,• �) ;� � � ;. o�I � � � I I ; �j' � ' { s I'' �' � ij,.rj �/ � �II 3� I � � � ,' � I'� i l �' 1 �� '.� � r: I!; c i i� � ' �� I � I � i � ' ;f.:,'r';i.�� . . 1 . • , ' �I II i � ( i , � � � � Oi� ,., ,, M . , i ' ' �II �I I ( , � �� r,�,� A � / � I � � ' I �, ' �� .1'1�1�i�.� fi � . II I � i! �� i � � f± �' � i ,� i . �� I ' I � � I I,�� A� ' � ��, I I I I I � 1 I�� t (�� ` , �� r �I � � �� I I�, ��l ,. ��_ � � � �. � � I �.��r!( j�� II I I � r I I i � i! I ��r1i'i� A i� .,'� �I I� I i I ., ; ' ; � i�j I�� ,`' , '' '' . . I� j� � I I ' I � ( 1 ilft(111 � / . ' • �� 4---1--+------1 , � � i. . I. � I�l� ,.��' i . �� I I i i ;. l, --� .. �� i; I � ��r.�l'. ' . . r--- ; l l % �l/%; � . (, ' : I � �� I � � i �_.E e �� IZ3.��. � I I � I ' I , � �� i M . �� i i � �'—��.�, � I � •'r ' � ' . � . . E�— L EW�K Nt,►O Ct�l�i.Tp1C � PP . � � ' ' . ' � G ..: - . . � 6�--- G G L � � . �.�: .. • ; 1.i � � j, �l � (� ` � ~ � . r +� Cv8'" AV. �V W. � . �. � I . • ' �1 ' • 0 0_1 y �.. s _. _ � _ , s °�..s.uiT�.1 st�e � r £ . � p —s— --t— —s— —r-- —s . u ,.�_- . . I� � • •• ' • I � � . n . -v. : r � Z . �---_ w • � �: . , ^ ~"� i �N1',��'n�� :��.•• � i •°Q o n � �. . � � ;: �, D'AVIO C. �DARRELL INC. ARCHITECTURE i PLANNINO �e�= LARKS�UR IANE EOINA, MINNE�OTA 66��' TEIEPNONE ��_,��.�� N Co" C1� WiTCF 1`1�IJJ� .. .. w ��w �� N F I I - i e�.e, �.xr,�u er e�.e. w.�m�n�. � ^�•'r iee or mder�m�me.a �uPavblos ud tlrt .m . duly RrliKaead � n.cbe.n wAer tl» .. ot y,. aaa ot �T• aa R.�, r� � �l,1CG�.T HoST MpT�1.,. R�LLY W Y. (05 ►JE. owNC h1�y��TA�. k1Ae�EU r�.ul.sor,,S