Loading...
PL 03/09/1994 - 30785CITY OB FRIDLEY `�' PLANNING COMMIBBION MEETINt3, MARCH 9, 1994 � ........_.._____......__-__.._,.,._____..__________________,..._,._....,._,.___.._...... CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Newman called the March 9, 1994, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Dave Newman, Dave Rondrick, Dean Saba, Connie Modig, Brad Sielaff, LeRoy Oquist Members Absent: Diane Savage Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Steve Woodley, Wal-Mart Chris Hamlin, Wal-Mart Scott Lund, Rite-Way Mobile Home Repair, Inc. Joyce Trebisovsky, Park Plaza Delores DeMars, Park Plaza APPROVAL OF JANUARY 12. 1994. PLANNING COMMISSION MINiJTES• MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to approve the January 12, 1994, Planning Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT REOUEST P.S. #94-01. BY SCOTT LUND OF RITE-WAY MOBILE HOME REPAIR: To split the East 180 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, Central View Manor 2nd Addition, and combine it with Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block 1, Central View Manor, generally located on Highway 65 south of Fireside Drive and north of 73 1/2 Avenuee MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIN(3 AYE� CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARIN(3 OPEN AT 7:32 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated that since the petitioner, Scott Lund, was not yet present, it might be appropriate to continue discussion on P.S. #94-01 and ZOA #94-01 until later in the meeting. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to continue the public hearings on P.S. #94-01 and ZOA #94-01 until later in the '� meeting. � PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING. MARCH 9. 199g PAGE 2 IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTINa AYE, CHAIRPER80N N�EWMArT DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIIBLY. 2. PUBLIC HEARIATG: CO1dSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SP �94-01. BY WAL-MART STORES: Per Section 205.14.O1.C.(13) of the Fridley City Code, to allow garden centers or nurseries which require outside display or storage of inerchandise on Lot 1, Block 1, Wal-Mart in Fridley, the same being 8540 University Avenue N.Ee MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. UPON A VOICL VOTE, ALL VOTIN� AYE� CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED 711�TD THE PIIBLIC HEARINa OPEN AT 7s33 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated this property is located at the intersection of 85th and University Avenues. The property is zoned C-2, General Business District. There is additional C-2 zoning to the south, and R-3, Multiple Dwelling District, to the west. Springbrook Nature Center is also located to the west. Ms. McPherson stated that in 1992, the Conunission and the City Council approved special use permit, SP #92-07, to allow the ,�-,� construction of the existing garden center. This approval required certain design elements in the garden center including rock face block knee walls and wrought iron fencing. The stipulations to that request required bulk items to be stored adjacent to the building and that there be no outdoor storage of chemicals. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioners are now requesting a special use permit to allow temporary garden sales to occur from a"hoop house'� and ��corralled" merchandise. A hoop house is a temporary greenhouse constructed of aluminum tubing and plastic. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioners propose to locate this temporary garden center in the southeast corner of the parking lot across the driving aisle from the existing garden center. The petitioners are requesting this second special use permit as a result of the large amount of inerchandise which is shipped to them during the growing season and which will not fit into the current garden center. Ms. McPherson stated that in 1993, Wal-Mart conducted garden sales on the sidewalk in front of the retail store and also had materials stored on pallets in the parking lot. Wal-Mart was informed by the City that this practice was not permitted by code and requested that the materials be moved. Ms. McPherson stated staff inet with the Manager and Assistant ''� Manager of Wal-Mart to discuss the previous request, SP #92-07, which permitted the existing garden center and the design elements. Staff informed Wal-Mart that if the current request was to occur PLANNING COMMI88ION MFETING. MARCH 9. 1994 PAGE 3 '� on a permanent basis, it would be inconsistent with the previous request approved in 1992. The intent of the original request was to require a more visually appearing location for the garden center and to contain activity in that area. ,� Ms. McPherson stated one of the managers stated they would contact the Wal-Mart corporate office to see if the corporate office would agree to the expansion of the existing garden center. At this time, staff has not heard the corporate office's response. If Wal- Mart is agreeabie to the expansion of the existing garden center, this special use permit request could be approved by the Planning Commission on a one year basis. Staff is recommending that the current special use permit request not be approved as a permanent activity. Ms . McPherson stated the location for the hoop house and the garden materials do not appear to conflict with the traffic on-site; however, approximately 40-50 parking spaces will be lost. Sales would begin in late March/early April and would continue until approximately August. Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the special use permit, SP #94-01, to allow the garden center on a one year basis. Staff recommends the following stipulations: 1. Bulk items shall be stored in the constructed garden center where they shall be screened from the public right-of-way. 2. Outdoor storage of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides shall not occur in the parking lot. 3. Wal-Mart shall submit plans for an enlarged garden center for Planning Commission and City Council review by November 1, 1994, for the 1995 sales year. Mr. Saba stated he had a question regarding stipulation #2 which refers to the storage of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides. Does that mean that chemical fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides could be brought out to the parking lot on a daily basis for sale? Ms. McPherson stated that the original stipulation stated: ��There shall be no outside storage of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides." There is no condition as to whether these items could be outside temporarily and them moved back into the store. Mr. Saba and Mr. Sielaff agreed that they did not want the storage or sale of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides occurring outside the main building. � Mr. Newman stated the Wal-Mart corporate office has to agree to enlarge the existing garden center in the future. If the PLANNINa CON�II88ION MEETIN�. MARCH 9. 1994 PAaE 9 ��� Commission limits the special use permit to this sales season only and Wal-Mart decides not to expand the existing garden center, then Wal-Mart has to take its chances as to whether or not the City would approve the special use permit for another season. Did staff have a problem with an additional stipulation limiting the special use permit to one year? � Ms. Dacy stated staff had no objection to that. Mr. Chris Hamlin, Assistant Manager for the Fridley Wal-Mart store, stated that last week the Divisional Vice President did commit verbally that he would approve the expansion of the existing garden center within the next two years and possibly even by next season. If stipulation #3 states that Wal-Mart must submit plans for an enlarged garden center by November 1, 1994, then they will do so by that date. Mr. Hamlin stated that last year was the first garden center season for this store, and they received a larger quantity of live goods than could fit into the existing garden center. In order to make a good presentation of the live goods they received, it was necessary to take some of them outside the existing garden center. This year they want to alleviate that problem by displaying live goods outside in the parking lot. This special use permit request is basically just a temporary measure. The ideal situation would be to expand the existing garden center, and that expansion has been committed to by the Divisional Vice President. Mr. Hamlin stated they will be using a new radio-frequency register which will alleviate the need for an electrical cord running from the building through the parking loto Mr. Newman asked if Mr. Hamlin had any objection to changing stipulation #3 to read: "Outdoor sales and storage of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides shall not occur in the parking lot. �� Mr. Hamlin stated he had no objection to that. There is no reason to store these chemicals outside, as they would be ruined and unsalable if they got wet. Mr. Sielaff stated another concern if the chemicals were stored or sold outside would be spillage which could go into the storm sewer. Ms. Modig stated the driving aisle between the existing garden center and the parking lot is very busy. How will Wal-Mart ensure the safety of customers crossing the driving aisle to the parking lot? Mr. Hamlin stated that is a valid concern. At the garden center, they always have an exit greeter. This person could help with �� traffic and make sure that the customers cross safely to the � parking lot. He stated he would be open to any other suggestions the Commission members might have about this concern. �'1 PLANNINa COMMI88ION ME�TINa, MARCS 9. 1994 PAaB 5 MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIN(3 AYE� CHAIRPERBON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARINd CLOSED AT 7s55 P.M. MoTIOAT by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to City Council approval of Special Use Permit, SP �94-01, by Wal-Mart stores, per Section 205.14.O1.C.(13) of the Fridley City Code, to allow garden centers or nurseries which require outside display or storage of inerchandise on Lot 1, Block 1, Wal-Mart in Fridley, the same being 8540 University Avenue N.E., with the following stipulations: 1. Bulk items shall be stored in the constructed garden center where they shall be screened from the public right-of-way. 2. Outdoor storage and sales of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides shall not occur in the parking lot. 3. Wal-Mart shall submit plans for an enlarged garden center for Planning Commission and City Council review by � November 1, 1994, for the 1995 sales year. 4. Special Use Permit, SP #94-01, will be for one year only. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERBON NEAMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. Ms. McPherson stated this item will go to Council on March 21, 1994. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT REOUEST P_ G_ �lAd�i�i7 �it% ennmm TTTI�TT AT TTTT1 T.��at• ��w���� ������ ____ __ ` To split the East 180 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, Central View Manor 2nd Addition, and combine it with Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block 1, Central View Manor, generally located on Highway 65 south of Fireside Drive and north of 73 1/2 Avenue. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to reopen the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CBAIRPLRSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARIN6 REOPENED AT 8:00 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated this vacant property is generally located north of 73 1/2 Avenue, south of Fireside Drive, and east of Highway 65. The property is zoned C-3, General Shopping Center '�1 district, and M-1, Light Industrial district. PLANNINa COI�lI88ION MESTINa. MARCS 9. 1994 PAQE 6 � Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner ia proposinq to split off approximately 180 feet of the easterly portion of Lot 3, Block 1, Central View Manor 2nd Addition, and combine it with Lots 7, 8, and 9 of Central View Addition. The petitioner proposes to construct a 13,000 square foot building on the property with parking and outdoor storage areas. Ms . McPherson stated the proposed lot that will be created as a result of the replat meets the 150 foot lot width requirement; however, it does not meet the minimum lot area requirement of 1.5 acres. The subject parcel is approximately .11 acres or 4,791.6 square feet short of the requirement. Section 211.05 of the Fridley City Code does allow variancea to the code requirements if the Planning Commission or City Council find that certain regulations are not applicable. However, the petitioner does have an opportunity to work with the existing property owner to acquire either an additional 15 feet along the entire westerly lot line or approximately 34 feet along the northerly portion (Lot 3, Block 1, Central View Manor 2nd Addition). It would make more sense to move the entire lot line as opposed to just the northerly portion as two odd shaped lots are left by just moving the northerly portion. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner has submitted a site plan showing a 13,000 square foot building. There is.parking in front adjacent to the public right-of-way and the proposed storage area � to the rear of the building. The building meets the setback requirements for the M-1, Light Industrial district, and the proposed lot coverage is 21.4�. The petitioner does need to revise the site plan to provide a 5 foot hard surface parking setback from the building along the west and north sides of the building. There is adequate room on site to provide this required setback. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner will need to provide additional screening along the north and west lot lines. A screening fence is located along the east lot line. There is a screening fence and some existing vegetation along the north lot line between the mobile home park and the proposed building. Staff is recommending additional screening by adding seven evergreens 10 feet on center along the fence. The evergreens will not only provide screening, but will also meet the landscaping requirements of the district. A third fence should be installed along the westerly property line with slats to provide screening from the public right-of-way. This is required if outdoor storage is to occur at the rear of the building. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner has provided a preliminary grading and drainage plan which was reviewed by the Assistant Public Works Director who had some additional comments. These comments are included in the Staff Report. The petitioner will be required to comply with those requirements prior to the issuance of a building permit. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner has provided a preliminary landscape plan. The petitioner will need to submit a revised PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING. MARCH 9. 1994 PAGE 7 � landscape plan which provides a three foot high hedge or berm screening the parking lot from the public right-of-way. Underground irrigation is also required. The petitioner has indicated that he will be saving the existing veqetation and trees which are located on the property. In order to receive credit for these trees, the petitioner must provide information as to the size of the trees. The petitioner needs to add four evergreen trees to the three proposed in the landscape plan to meet the 30� evergreen requirement in the landscape requirements. Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the plat request, P.S. #94-01, acknowledging that the lot area does not meet the minimum 1.5 acre requirementa While is recommended that the Commission acknowledge the lot area variance, staff has stipulated that the petitioner should attempt to meet the minimum lot area requirement prior to the City Council meeting. Staff also recommends the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall submit a revised site plan prior to the issuance of a building permit showing a 5 foot hard surface setback along the west and north sides of the buildingo 2. The petitioner shall provide additional screening through planting of seven, 6 foot high coniferous trees along the � north property line. 3. The petitioner shall construct a minimum 6 foot high screening fence along the west property line. The screening fence shall be constructed of chain link and contain metal slats. 4. outdoor storage shall be permitted if the following conditions are mete a. The outdoor storage shall occur on a hard surface. b. The materials to be stored shall be less than 15 feet in height. c. The materials to be stored shall not be seen from the public right-of-way. d. The petitioner shall install a gate with slats parallel to the front line of the building. 5. The petitioner shall submit an amended landscape plan prior to the issuance of a building permit with the following changes: ,� a. Underground irrigation shall be provided. PLANNINa COMMI88ION MEETINa� MARCH 9. 1994 PAa$ 8 '� b. The dimensions of the existing trees to be saved shall be indicated on the plan to calculate credit for the existing trees. c. Four additional 6 foot high coniferous trees shall be added to comply with the ordinance. The i coniferous trees shall be planted along the north property line for additional screening from the residential district to the north. 6e The petitioner shall submit a revised grading and drainage plan complying with Scott Erickson's memo dated March 2, 1994, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 7. Yf the fence adj acent to the mobile home park is removed, the petitioner shall install a minimum 6 foot high screening fence with slats along the north lot line. 8. The petitioner shall revise the plat to meet the minimum lot area requirement of the M-1, Light Industrial district. Mr. Scott Lund, owner of Rite-Way Mobile Home Repair, Inc., stated stipulation #8 seems to be the biggest concern for him. He has ,� talked to the property owner, Alvin Schrader, from which he purchased the back portion of the property. Mr. Schrader is not interested in selling an additional 15 feet all along the westerly lot line and it would be cost-prohibitive if Mr. Schrader did agree to sell. Mr. Schrader is reluctant to lose any prime frontage. Mr. Lund stated stipulation #4-a requires that the outdoor storage be on a hard surface. He does not propose to have any long term vehicles stored in back, although his mechanics usually have one semi-trailer that would be stored in the back indefinitely for the storage of miscellaneous parts. However, since it is just a trailer, there would be no leakage of fluidse Mr. Lund stated he did not want to have to spend the money to asphalt the entire back of the property. He would be willing to put down Class 5 or something equivalent, and the area would be fenced in for privacy and security. Mr. Lund stated that from time to time, he does obtain some mobile homes that will be parked on the property, but not for extended periods of time. The mobile homes are used for the rental of temporary housing for fire victims, etc., especially in rural areas. Mr. Lund stated he has no problem with any of the other stipulations. � Mr. Oquist asked if Mr. Lund could identify the area needed for the trailer and make that area hard surface. � , PLANNINa COMNlISSION MEETINa. MARCS 9. 1994 PAGE 9 Mr. Lund stated it would be a waste of money to asphalt the area where the mobile homes would be parked as they just sink through the asphalt when the asphalt becomes soft. Mr. Oquist stated concrete could be poured on the areas where the tires would sit. That wouid prevent the mobile homes from sinking through the asphalte Mr. Lund stated that part of his building will be used by other tenants. At this time, he does not know who those tenants will be. Some of these tenants may need some outdoor storage. It would be very expensive to asphalt/concrete the storage a=eas. Ms. Dacy stated the proposed building is a typical size industrial buildinq, and the ordinance is very clear that any type of vehicular use area has to occur on a hard surface. It is going to take some area for vehicle turn-around, and the site plan shows adequate area to provide for that. Yn order for staff to be consistent on all types of development applications, staff must recommend hard surface. She realized that the asphalt does become soft and sinks under heavy equipment, so maybe there is an option of a certain portion of the area that is asphalt and a portion that is of another type of material. �� Mr. Newman stated he agreed with staff. He appreciated the petitioner�s concerns; but if the City is going to have this ordinance, he did not see any justification to not enforce the hard surface requirement for Mr. Lund when they are enforcing it elsewhere in the City. Mr. Dacy stated that, practically speaking, she believed the petitioner is going to need the hard surface anyway in the near future, and it might be more cost-effective to install it now rather than in the future. Mr. Lund stated staff may be right; he just did not want to see an asphalt jungle. Mr. Newman stated no one wants to see an asphalt jungle. He believed the recommendation is that Mr. Lund needs to figure out what area will be used for storage, and then that portion used for storage needs to be hard surfaced. Ms. Delores DeMars stated she and Ms. Joyce Trebisovsky from the Park Plaza mobile home park do not have any objection to the development proposed by Mr. Lund. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to close the public hearing. ^ UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERBON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:35 P.M. PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETINa. MARCH 9. 1994 PAa$ 10 `� Mr. Kondrick stated he will vote in favor of the plat request with the deletion of stipulation #8. It will be a nice improvement for this area. � Mr. Oquist agreed. This site has been kind of a dumping qround for a long time. He also agreed to delete stipulation #8. Ms. Modig stated she will vote in favor of the plat request; however, she is concerned about the outdoor storage. There are other businesses in this area that have never cleaned up their outdoor storage. If they eliminate stipulation #8 regarding the minimum lot area, does Mr. Lund need to get a variance? Mr. Newman stated that by approving the plat, they are approving the lot as it is. This is a variance of 1/10 of an acre. The City has done this in the past for lots that would otherwise be unbuildable, so a precedent has already been set. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to City Council approval of P.S. #94-01, by Scott Lund of Rite-Way Home Repair, to split the East 180 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, Central View Manor 2nd Addition, and combine it with Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block 1, Central View Manor, generally located on Highway 65 south of Fireside Drive and north of 73 1/2 Avenue, with the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall submit a revised site plan prior to the issuance of a building permit showing a 5 foot hard surface setback along the west and north sides of the building. 2. The petitioner shall provide additional screening through planting of seven, 6 foot high coniferous trees along the north property line. 3. The petitioner shall construct a minimum 6 foot high screening fence along the west property line. The screening fence shall be constructed of chain link and contain metal slats. 4. Outdoor storage shall be permitted if the following conditions are met: a. The outdoor storage shall occur on a hard surface. b. The materials to be stored shall be less than 15 feet in height. c. The materials to be stored shall not be seen from the public right-of-way. � d. The petitioner shall install a gate with slats parallel to the front line of the building. PLANNINa COMMI88ION MESTINa. MARCB 9. 1994 PAGE 11 r� 5. The petitioner shall submit an amended landscape plan prior to the issuance of a building permit with the following changes: a. Underground irrigation shall be provided. b. The dimensions of the existing trees to be saved shall be indicated on the plan to calculate credit for the existing trees. c. Four additional 6 foot high coniferous trees shall be added to comply with the ordinance. The 7 coniferous trees shall be planted along the north property line for additional screening from the residential district to the north. 6. The petitioner shall submit a revised grading and drainage plan complying with Scott Erickson's memo dated March 2, 1994, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 7. If the fence adjacent to the mobile home park is removed, the petitioner shall install a minimum 6 foot high screening fence with slats along the north lot line. � IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPER80N NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: COIVSIDERATION OF A REZONIIVG REOUEST ZOA #94 O1. BY SCOTT LUND OF RITE-WAY MOBILE HOME REPAIR: To rezone property from C-3, General Shopping Center District, to M-1, Light Industrial District, on the East 180 feet of Lot 3, BLock 1, Central View Manor Second Addition, generally located on Highway 65 south of Fireside Drive and north of 73 1/2 Avenue N.E. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWNlPIN DBCLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND T8E PIIBLIC HEARINa OPEN AT 8:40 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the rezoning request only applies to the easterly 180 feet of the Lot 3, Block 1, Central View Manor Second Addition, which is the northerly one-third of the proposed development property. Ms. McPherson stated that in evaluating rezoning requests, three criteria must be met: 1. Compatibility of the proposed use with the proposed ^ district; PLANNINa COMMI88ION MEETIN�� MARCH 9. 1994 PAGE 12 � 2. Compatibility of the proposed district with adjacent uses and zoning; and 3. Compliance with the proposed use with the proposed district requirements. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is requesting that the zoning be changed from C-3, General Shopping Center district, to M-1, Light Industrial district. The three lots to the south are currently zoned M-1, Light Industrial. The petitioner has proposed to construct an office/warehouse building which is a permitted use within the M-1 district. Ms. McPherson stated the proposed M-1, Light Industrial district, would be compatible with the existing M-1, Light Industrial district, zoning to the south and east of the subject parcel. Parcels to the west will remain zoned C-3, General Shopping Center district, and the parcel to the north is zoned R-4, Mobile Home, and C-3, General Shopping Center. The mobile home park has been located adjacent to the M-1 zoning to the east since it was constructed in the early 1960s. There are screening requirements in the M-1 district which require additional buffering and screening for the residential zoning. Locating the M-1 zoning next to the C-3 zoning, which is the most intensive commercial district in the City is a compatible zoning practice. Also, rezoning this � portion of Lot 3 would create a better development parcel. Therefore, the proposed district is compatible with both of the adjacent uses and the zoning. Ms. McPherson stated the proposed development meets the minimum code requirements for the M-1, Light Industrial districta The property as proposed meets all the district requirements with the exception of the lot area requirement discussed with the plat request. The Council may grant a variance to the lot area during the subdivision process. Therefore, the proposed use complies with the proposed district requirements. Ms. McPherson stated the rezoning meets the three criteria for approval. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the rezoning request with one stipulation: The plat request, P.S. #94-04, shall be approvede Mr. Kondrick asked if staff has received any negative responses regarding the plat or rezoning requests. Ms. McPherson stated she received only one call from someone from the SuperAmerica Station located south of 73rd Avenue who just wanted information about the development but was not opposed to it. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPLR80N NEWM1Ald DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOBED AT 8:46 P.M. PLANNINa COMMI88ION MESTINa. MARCH 9. 1994 PAa� 13 r", MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to recommend to City Council approval of rezoning request, ZOA #94-01, by Scott Lund of Rite-Way Mobile Home Repair, to rezone property from C-3, General Shopping Center District, to M-1, Light Industrial District, on the East 180 feet of Lot 3, BLock 1, Central View Manor Second Addition, generally located on Highway 65 south of Fireside Drive and north of 73 1/2 Avenue N.E., with the following stipulation: 1. The plat request, P.S. #94-04, shall be approved. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTINa AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED ONANIMOIIBLY. 4. RECEIVE THE DECEMBER 21 1993 ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY & ENERGY COMMISSION MIATUTES: MOTION by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the December 21, 1993, Environmental Quality & Energy Commission minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CBAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLYe 5. RECEIVE THE JANUARY 3 1994 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION � MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the January 3, 1994, Parks & Recreation Commission minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL DOTING AYE, CBAIRPERBON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRITsD IINANIMOIIBLY. 6. RECEIVE THE JANiJARY 6 1994 HOUSIATG & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTESs MoTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to receive the January 6, 1994, Housing & Redevelopment Authority minutese IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTINC� AYE� CHAIRPERBON NEWMAN DECLARED 'fi8E MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 7. RECEIVE THE JANUARY 11 1994 APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to receive the January 11, 1994, Appeals Commission minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, AI,L VOTING AYF, CHAIRPER80N N�EAMAAT DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. 8. RECEIVE THE FEBRUARY 3 1994 HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: PLANNINa COMMI88ION MEETINQ, MARCH 9, 1994 PAGE 14 � MOTION by Mr. Rondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to receive the February 3, 1994, Housing & Redevelopment Authority minutes. IIPON A VOIC$ VOTS, ALL VOTING AYE� CSAIRP8R80N NEWMAN DECLARED T$E MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIIBLY. 9. RECEIVE THE FEBRUARY 10. 1994. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the February 18, 1994, Human Resources Commission minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 10. RECEIVE THE FEBRUARY 7� 1994, PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to receive the February 7, 1994, Parks & Recreation Commission minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED T8E MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. ADJOURNMENT• "� MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to adjourn the meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Newman declared the motion carried and the March 9, 1994, Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Respectfully sub�,itted, �� a � ��� �� V ��� ����� Lyn � Saba Recording Secretary ,�1