Loading...
PL 12/20/1995 - 7088"`� CITY OF FRIDLEY ACENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 20, 1995 7:30 paM. LOCATION: Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES: November 1, 1995 PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A� SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #95-1p BY BWBR ARCHITECTS FOR UNITY HOSPITAL• Per Section 205.07.01.C.(8) of the Fridley City Code, to allow expansion of a hospital in an R-1, Single Family Dwelling district, generally located at 550 Osbome Road N.E. APPROVE 1996 MEETINC, DATES �� RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUTY & ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING OF OCTOBER i7 1995 RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETI(dG OF OCTOBER 24, 1995 RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 6 1995 RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSiON MEETING OF NOVEMBER 7, 1995 RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING OF NOVEMBER 9 1995 RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 21. 1995 OTHER BUSINESS: ADJOURNMENT � � r"1 ,� CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMIgBION MEETING, NOVEMBER 1, 1995 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Newman called the November 1, 1995, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL• Members Present: Members Absent: Dave Newman, Dave Kondrick, Diane Savage, LeRoy Oquist, Dean Saba, Connie Modig Brad Sielaff Others Present: Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Dennis Zylla, Northco A1 Quam, 399 - 73rd Avenue N.E. Jim Holmen, 7310 Tempo Terrace John Allen, Industrial Equities APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 18 1995 PLANNING COMMISSION MINTJTES: Mr. lJewman requested the following additions to the minutes: Page 5, after the second paragraph, add the statement, pNo one from the public appeared.for this item." Page 6, after the first paragraph, add the statement, pNo one appeared other than the petitioner who was available to answer questions.�� MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr, Oquist, to approve the October 18, 1995, Planning Commission minutes as amended. IIPON A VOICS VOTL, ALL VOTINQ AYE, CHAIRPLR80N NEW��i DECLARSD THE MOTION CARRIED D�NIMOIIBI.Y. 1. CONSIDERATION.OF A VACATION REOIIEST SAV #95-05 BY INDUSTRIAL EOIIITIES: � To vacate those particular 20.00 foot drainage and utility easements originally dedicated on the recorded plats of Northco Business Park and Northco Business Park 2nd Addition and now to be vacated which lie within Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, in said Northco Business Park and Lot 2, Block l, said Northco Business Park 2nd Addition and lying southerly of the northerly 20.00 feet of said lots. The centerline of said 20.00 foot easement is descri.bed as follows: Commencing at the most southerly corner of said Lot i; thence northwesterly, along the southwesterly line of said Lot l, a distance of 62.51 feet; to the intersection with the westerly line of said Lot 1(said intersection pLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING NOVEMBER 1 1995 PAG$ 2 hereinafter referred to as �Point Ap); thence southeasterly, along a line passing through a point on a southeasterly line of said Lot 2, Block l, Northco Business Park distant 29.00 feet southwesterly from said most southerly corner, a distance of 85.00 feet, to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence northwesterly, a distance of 85.00 feet, to the above referenced "Point A"; thence northerly, along the westerly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 379.40 feet and said centerline there terminating, generally located at the southwest corner of 73rd Avenue and Northco Drive. Ms. McPherson stated an informal hearing is being held to consider a vacation request by Industrial Equities. The location of the request is at the intersection of 73rd Avenue and the East University Avenue service drive. The property spans two legally described lots. The petitioner is requesting that the City . approve the vacation of a 20.00 foot drainage and utility easement which runs in a north/south direction through the middle. of the subject parcel. The purpose of the vacation request is to allow construction of an 87,000 square foot multi-tenant speculative industrial building. The building is 600 feet fronting 73rd Avenue and 160 feet in the north/south direction. Currently located i.n the utility easement, which is 20.00 feet wide (10.00 feet on either side of the lot line), is a 24-ir�ch storm sewer line which connects with the storm water system from Northco Drive to 73rd Avenue. The petitioner has developed plans to voluntarily reiocate this storm sewer line in such a manner as the water will go through a drainage pond, through a pipe across the southwesterly right-of-way into another pond along the west side of the site, and finally connecting via anather pipe into the storm water system on 73rd Avenue. The Engineering Department has no objections to the proposed plan by the petitioner. The request does not adversely impact the storm water system €or the City. Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of the request with the following stipulations: � � 1. The petitioner system from the the parking lot of 73rd Avenue shall maintain the storm water drainage manhole located in the southeast corner of and the outlet located at the intersection and the East University Avenue Service Road. 2. The petitioner shall execute and record against the property a storm water pond maintenance agreement. � Ms. McPherson stated, as presented, the site plan does meet the requirements of the M-2, Heavy Industrial District, with the exception of the loading docks which face Narthco Drive. The petitioner will be processing a variance request, which will be � �"� � r",, ,-r-� PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING NOVEMBER 1 1995 PAGE 3 reviewed by the Appeals Commission next week, regardinq the location of the loading docks. Ms. Savage asked if a recommendation for approval would need a stipulation contingent upon that approval. Ms. McPherson stated no. The petitioner could redesign the building so that there were no loading docks facing the right-of- way. Mr. Newman asked if the two lots would be combined into one tax parcel and if that needed to be part of this approval process. Ms. McPherson stated yes, the lots would be combined into one tax parcel. This can be done as part of the aclministrative process. The petitioner is seeking tax increment financinq for some soil correction. The combining of the parcels would be handled through that process. Mr. Zylla stated represented the Fridley Business Center partnership, which is the seller of the land. They also had to siqn a petition in support of the vacation. He is attending the meeting to express the partnership's support of what the � petitioner is proposing. They are prepared to answer whatever questions he can as part of this process. They are not directly tied into the application for planning approval, but they are aware of the need for $ variance. The storm sewer 3s a situation that no one foresaw when the property was platted. With the market being what it is, the petitioner is more interested in developing a more linear, high bay building and the storm sewer is basically in the way. He received a copy of the meeting minutes of the Rice Creek Watershed District, which suppo=ts the request. There is no adverse watershed i.mpact. What the petitioner is proposing is probably somewhat of ar� enhancement to the sedimentation issue that typically watershed districts are � concerned about. The proposed system would provide more filtration of the water thraugh the system of ponds. He did not see any adverse environmental impact. The vacation is primarily . a convenience for the development of the property for intended use. Mr. Newman asked if the closing had taken place. Mr. Zylla stated no. Mr. Newman asked if there was any reason the Planninq Commission would need to make the vacation contingent upon any events. Mr. Zylla stated, between now and the City.Council meeting, they �'�1 may have a closinq. If that does not occur, they would want the actual publication of the meeting notice og official action be PLANNING COMMI88ION MESTING NOVEMBBR 1 1995 PAaE 4 � postponed until closing occurs. He did not want to complicate this proceeding because they are confident that this will happen. Mr. Newman asked staff if this should be included as a stipulation. . Ms. McPherson suggested making note of the concern. She will talk with Ms. Dacy, Mr. Zylla and the petitioner, and schedule the ordinance.publication accordingly, A formal public hearing still needs to be established before the City Council. At their meeting of November 13, the Council would establish a public hearing for November 27. The first reading of the ordinance would not occur until December and the second reading in January. Officially, the publication of the ordinance would not occur until perhaps the second week in January which should give the petitioner ample time to resolve the issues regarding closing. Mr. Zylla stated they will be closing or the petitioner will be escrowing funds in anticipation of starting some of the work such as footings and foundatipn or providing some assurance that h� will close. He daes not see a problem in putting on a condition that approval is subject to closing. Mr. Quam asked for an explanation of the process and a review of the dates. Mr. Newman reviewed the process in detail, the date for establishing a public hearing and the date of the actual public hearing. Mr. Quam stated he was here to object. He sees two variance requests for this. If the Commission were to recommend approval, he would hope that it would be contingent upon the setback of the, project. Several of us in.Melody Manor who live right across the. street would spend the rest of our lives looking at this. All the properties along 73rd Avenue were developed with a good setback and with ample screening, and this property is not. Mr. Newman asked staff if the variances would be heard by the City Council at the same time. Ms. McPherson stated the variance does not require a public hearing before the Council. If the Council is looking at an item and there are people present who wish to speak at the meeting, this would probably not occur until the December meeting. Assuming staff recommends approval of an ordinance to vacate this easement, then the variance would be brought before the Council at that time. Only one variance has been requested which will be considered by the Appeals Commission on November 7. -'"� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVSMBER 1 1995 PAG$ 5 Mr. Allen stated he was the developer of this property. There is a variance requested for the truck side facing Northco Drive. It is a rather unique ordinance in the City in considering that side of the building the front drive. Because of the calculations on square footage and distance, they probably need a variance to make sure they are safe in that regard. They have screened the trucks from 73rd. With reqard to the vacation of the storm sewer, they are proposing to vacate the easement that goes under the building currently. They are proposing to take the water that comes off of the public street through a pond, through a second pond, and then to the storm water system. From the standpoint of water quality, he felt they were doing something that does not currently exist and enhancing the quality of the water going into the retention area. Mr. Allen stated the building complies with the setback requirements. It complies with every aspect of the development that was signed with the City of Fridley and Northco Development. The only variance being requested is for the truck dock area. They intend to keep the trucks in the back of the building. They are trying to project a first class campus image and attract good tenants. They do a good job with landscaping and berming. They have similar projects in the area for which they are willing to � provide addresses. They are very conscientious of the residents and will work with residents. Mr. Holman stated he had concerns about the width of tiie berm and the bike path. . Mr. Allen.stated, because these were not part of the discussion for the vacation request, he would respond to Mr. Holman�s questions at a later �ime. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Savage, to recommend approval of a Vacation Request, SAV �95-05, by Industrial Equities, to vacate those particular 20.00 foot drainage and utility easements originally dedicated on the recorded plats of Northco Business Park and Northco Business Park 2nd Addition and now to be vacated which lie within Lots 1 and 2, Bl�k 1, in said Northco business Park and Lot 2, Block 1, said Northco Business Park 2nd Addition and lyinq southerly of the northerly 20.00 feet of said lots. The centerline of said 20.00 foot easement is described as follows:. Commencing at the most southerly corner of said Lot 1; thence northwesterly, along the southwesterly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 62.51 feet, to the intersection with the westerly line of said Lot 1(said intersection hereinafter re€erred to as "Point A��j; thence southeasterly, along a line passing through a point on a southeasterly line of said Lot 2, Block l, Northco �,,,� Business Park distant 29.00 feet southwesterly from said most southerly corner, a distance of 85.00 feet, to the point of beqinninq of the centerline to be described; thence PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. NOVEMBER 1, 1995 PAGE 6 ^ northwesterly, a distance of 85.00 feet, to the above referenced "Point AN; thence northerly, along the westerly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 379.40 feet and said centerline there terminating, generally located at the southwest corner of 73rd Avenue and Northco Drive, with the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall maintain the storm water drainage system from the manhole located in the southeast corner of the parking lot and the outlet located at the intersection of 73rd Avenue and the East IIniversity Avenue Servi.ce Road. 2. The petitioner shall execute and record against the property a storm water pond maintenance agreement. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, AI�L VOTINt� AYl�, CHAIRPERSON NLWMAN DLCLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. Mr. Newman stated the Appeale Commission would address the issue of a variance request on November 7; and the City Council will conduct a public hearing on the vacation request on November 27. 2. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PARRS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 11. 1995 ^ OTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to receive the minutes of the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of September 11, 1995. UPON A VOICE VOTl:, ALL VOTING AYB, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAI�T DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOIISLY. ADJOURNMENT OM TION by Mr. Rondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to adjourn the meeting. IIPON A VOICF VOTE, ALL VOTINQr AYS, CHAIRPERBOH �TE�MAN DLCLARED THE MOTIOIJ CARRIED AND TH8 NOVEMBER 1� 1995� PLANNINa COMMIBSION MEETINt� ADJOIIRNED AT 7i55 P.M. � Respectfully submitted, � � ��11 Lavonn Cooper Recording Searetary A 1 �'"� S I G N— IN S H E E T PLANNING COMMISSION:MEETING, Wednesday, November 1, 1995 � '; :t Name Address/Business � ���� fa-� � �..� � �,�� � � �' �' �3 � A �- � `,l�i-, � � ;* . �,.a�_ � F.�.. �.r � � � � � � _..� :.� t-Y 1 �..� . ^s ��" E� � . , �:�, m � C,/ e - � 0 �� DESCRIPTION OF REQUESI: The Petitioner requests that a special use permit l� approved to allow a small addition to the front of the hospital. The purpose of the addition is to consolidate phazmacy and radiology seivices. Consolidation of these services w�71 allow the creation of an Ambulatory Care Unit (see body of report for furtlier explanation). The total increase in square footage of the hospital footprint w�l be 3,750 square feet SUr1VIlVIARY OF ISSUES: Section 205.07.O1.C. (8) of the City Code requires a special use permit for hospitals, clinics, nuising homes, convalescent homes and homes for the elderly in the R-1, Single Fam1y Dwelling Distric� The proposed addition w71 have no impact on the adjacent residential properties located to the east, south, and west of the hospital complex.. No setbacks w�l be affected. Six parking spaces will be lost as a result of the addition, however, there is adequa.te space on the properiy for additional parking should the City deem it nec�ssary. The City should reserve the right to require additional parking spaces should demand require it RECOMIVIENDED ACTIONS: Staff recommends that the Planning Commercial recommend approval of the special use permit request to the City Council with the following stipulation: 1. The City reseives the right to require additional parking spaces should the need warrant it. � Staff Report /"�, SP #95-10, by BWBR Architects Page 2 PROJECT DETAILS Petition For. Special Use Permit to allow expansion of a hospital facility in an R-1, Single Family Dwelling District Location of Property: Legal Description of Property: Size: Topography: Existing Vegetation: Existing Zoning/Platting: Availability of Municipal Utilities: Vehicular Access: Pedestrian Access: Engineering Issues: 550 Osbome Road N.E. Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 11, Township 30, Range 24 31 acres Flat Typical suburban; sod, landscaping, trees, etc. Metes and Bounds, date unknown, R-1, Single Family Dwelling Connected Osbome Road, Monroe Street Bike�uvay and sidewalk along Osbome Road None 2 �"� ,� J �taff Report �P #95-10, by BWBR Architects Page 3 Site Planning Issues: Request DEVELOPMENT SITE The petitioner requests that a special use permit be issued to allow the expansion of the e�asting hospital facility. This expansion will allow the consolidation of the radiology (x ray) department, the existing inpatierrt and communiiy pharrnacies, and the cre�ation of an Ambulatory Care Unit An Ambulatory Care Unit is for patierrts t1�t will walk-in, have a procedure done, and go I�me. The length of stay may be anywhere from 2 to 10-12 hours. Example.s of such procedur� include IV treatmer�ts, endoscopies, miscellaneous diagnostics, or minor surgery (not a common occurrer�ce). The purpose of the creation of this Unit is to separate out-patierrt, short�errn care �i�ts from in- patierrt, long term care patierrt.s. The total square f�tage of expansion will be 3,750 square feet. The expansion will result in removal of one of three canopies in frorrt of the hospifial. HiStON ,-�he hospital was originally constructe,c! in 1965. Additions occurred in 1970, 1971, 1980, 1�2, 1985 �,.solarium), 1985 (addition to medical cerrte�, 1991, and 199;i. Also I�ated on the property is a mairrtenance garage. In 1993, the hospital also installed a traffic light on Osbome Road and constructed a new parking lot/revised e�asting driving aisl�. Analysis The proposec! add'rqon does not impact the zoning requiremer�s or adjacerrt properti�. Six paridng spaces will be lost from in frorrt of the hospital building, however, these spaces could be constructed elsewhere on the site should the City require additional paridng space.s. The parldng spaces will be lost as a r�uft of the canopy being closed ar� the neec! to reroute traffic orrto a diff�errt driveway. Rerouting this tr�ffic will actually improve traffic flow in frorrt of the hospital� as it elimirrat� traffic cor�flicts in front of the Emergency Canopy; the most easteriy r,anopy in front of the hospital. The Ciiy has not received complairrts regar�ding the parking supply. The City should r�re the right to require additional parking should complairrts be recenre.cl. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the request to the City Council, with the following stipulation: i. The City resenre� the right to require additional parking should demand of the facility warrant it � 3 Staff Report SP #95-10, by BWBR Architects Page 4 WEST: SOUII-I: EAST: NORTH: Comprehensive Planning Issues: Public Hea�ing Comments: ADJACENT SITES Zoning: R-1, Single Family Zoning: R-1, Singie Family Zoning: R-1, Single Family CR-1, General Office Zoning: Unknowm 4 Land Use: R�idenfial Land Use: Residential Land Use: Nursing Home Medical Ciinic Land Use: Spring Lake Park a � �, � /"� �� �� � � swsR ARCHITECTS November 17, 1995 City of Fridley Community Development Department 6431 University Avenue, NE Fridley, MN 55432 \rrhi�rcturr • Intrriur �>��,��_„ RE: Unity Hospital � Ambulaxory Care Center BWBR Commission No. 95060 Dear Council Members: The scope of this project is to facilitate a new Ambulatory Care Service while integrating and renovating the existing procedural areas such as Radiology, � including C.T. and M.RI. services. Since the 1993 Surgery Expansion and Renovation, the old O.R areas have been vacated and will now be developed into the Ambulatory Service Center. Service requirements for the provisions of care to these patients have intensified as new procednres, treatments, and technologies are developed and implemented. To accommodate this, the team is developing a cohesive ambulatory service program. �Sihlct $Urrl SUiir �11(I 1'aul. Alinnr.���a ��Iul � , i , , , � � � � i i �� The Pharmaceutical Department will also be consolidating their functions to one location, which will be the expansion' westward from their existing Surgery area near the Emergency Services entrance. This consolidation of the department will occur in the courtyard just east of Emergency Services and direcdy west of where the existing Inpatient Discharge area is located at the north facade of the Hospital. Outside of the Ambulatory Service Center, there will be some moderate renovation and remodeling of the existing Radiology Department. Included in this scope is primarily suppoR space changes while maintaining, through phasing, the four existing X-ray Procedure areas. Related to the existing Radiology Department is the relocation of the rnobile M.R.I. to a iixed location, and the relocation of an existing C.T. Exam Room. City of Fridley November 17, 1995 Page 2 � The relocation of these two spaces, along with their support areas, will be situated where the existing canopy and entrance currently designed as "inpatient discharge". Lnpact to the north facade of the exterior will be: • Loss of six parking spaces. • Increased footprint of building by 3,750 sq. ft • New addition will increase by 8' to the north of where existing canopy is carrently located. • The new addition will be designed to integrate with the existing facade. Currently the Hospital is not experiencing any parking problems and does not foresee any future problems based on the consolidation and renovation of these spaces for this project As illustrated in the atta.ched graphics, the impact in plan as well as exterior should � minimal. This design will reflect the needs to consider the human ,-1 scale proportions and detail in order to successfully fulfill the objectives set fourth by our Clien� Sincerely yours, BWBR ARCHITECTS, INC. Michael D. Boldenow Project Architect Attachment ,� 17 November, 1995 BWBR Arclutects, Inc. il-17LTR.DOC ' �� 3 ! -� � ,;.� 3 .'.;� t") :,�.�.���'S �.�i _ ... _ _. ...._"_". .._.. . —. .. "". e i ' .. t . � � . ��i ;-. :'� _ �` ` \ 1,; �. 4 � . . __ , .. . . .. , , •� \ 1� .J n � � r �f y7 �, �.� - . � . . . , _�� . . . . . ..:�-� SP 4�95-10 BRBR Architects ...... __ .._.. .' _. _ _ _ _ .". . .. ' _. ..... ._ '. '. . . �i. y I r � � : � : .,n-..—:7 � - _ _ P . . 7 j - j F{ ._i ' . J . ., �.. _ - _ . .- _ - - - : -1 i --. . _ .�. . __.. . ..., _ i :� a - --' � _ _ - 7- - _.�.. ` _ ._ _ + , __ � �. -- ..,.. , , -_:_;. _ , _ _ � . � . _ I 'i -� . _ _" _ f_ .. ... .. � . _ . . . .' i.'� .._ -.. _.. l._. . . . , - __'i . + _. . . .. ... . . . t.. _ . E .�,� ' - .. .. - . .. _ ' ' . "_ L'._ . ...._ . .L. '.' ' " ._ . — . . . . .._ . r —. . ..t— � — � f t � .. _ r._. .,-- ..r_ . '. _. c � ._. .._ . _ : . _... ._. ._i �i -�:! � ...-_.... k�.,..'�s": �'"'"� C....^a:;:k r,:_"�:..:�� �°� `. �s �..^.''..�<` • r : _ _r: ' � � \ . � ��� . �. `� . .� .� t _ . k_. .. . . ��� � � -.�~ . . . ,. � : t`_" - !: .� r .r�°'..._: -- .��� .+'`i „``�w N�t G�,4NC�� IN P,4i�CINC�: - � 5P,4C�5 I , „ Sheet Title Drawn Date Comm. No. Sheet No. CJ ( � ��1 � I111i/9� 95060�0 . � .iject UNITY HOSPITAL A M BULATO RY CARE CENTER 4�0 Sibley Street, Suite 500 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 612-222-3701 Copyr�ght BWBR Architects 1`� � �`i� �! �� � ii � i� :� ; � �. ;: EX18TI1� �IIIG�It�s rl :�"� Y/ V�Y� 1 Ii' �_- .__� �1: i , ,�- . � I ' :-.. ."_ "__..._.._.. "".. _.. –:�- .'. 'ti_I_"___._.—"— _.�. �I p � : �'9 - _.�:�. ;i ! i I- � ` ��_�.� i:= __..-_..����,`: ��� - ---- _-- ..�.�--��;��:.�� —^ — —�r � �� � a / i,�, b il _,, .� ` �� :i �,r - ,�.e,�.....�.,�...d..m.. �� �'� i �.1 --_'___. __.--:__—. __-` r' ., �_�_._ ----'----`- �--�---- .. : �'•-- : � � �''-� '__"'_'���!` i - ti ( �i-__C...c.,.._,._. :f' ,, '�i_.,"..� � �, _-'�'�� � �, �� ' � _ --'a- . � '��,� �y ..� •. _� .-:�r: _-., w --� ' �"'{' �_ � f`� � �_ � t,,. � � . I.. '� a _ � i � ,�.--.�-`�' �� _ � r_._ J. _,�„� � i{� � ;I,"."t,�� .�; SP 4�95-10 _y; . . ..:-; i . , �, , _� � •--- +� �-t_--='�-=,t i '` _• f "_ . 1 ='� t-..—e x � � �� � _ }�-,�i , i� • '. Sheet Title D�awn Date Comm. No. Sheet No: FLOOi2 PL,4N n�,� �m�m.mm 2 Project UNITY HOSPITAL A M B U L ATO R Y CAFiE CENTER 4d0 Sibley Street, Snite 500 Saint Paul, Minneaota 55101 812-222-3781 Copyright BWBR Architects 1�1P � �i� � �r �r7�—�U RWRR Architects �� � Sheet Title Qrawn � Date Comm. No. Sheet No. NORt� �1.�YATION r►,� �im�� �0.�m 3 UN1TY HOSPITAL A M B U L ATO R Y CARE CENT� 4� Sibley 3treet, Suite 500 Saint Paul, Minneaota 55101 612-222-3701 Cop}right BWBR Architects 1`1�' BMYBtf A�T�T8 PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the Fridley Planning Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Wednesday, December 20,. 1995 at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: ' Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP �95-10, by BWBR Architects for Unity Hospital, per Section 205.07.O1.C.(8) of the Fridley City Code, to allow expansion of a hospital in an R-1, Single Family Dwelling district, generally located at 550 Osborne Road N.E. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than December 13, 1995. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department at 572-3593. DAVID NEWMAN CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: December 7, 1995 December 14, 1995 � � � � ,-_, CITY OF FRIDLEY � 6431 UNIVERSTTY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 '� (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM PROPERTY INFORMATIOI�I - site plan required for submittal; see attached Address: 7' � � t� r ` /Y� �?a �..� .� Z- r Property Identifica on Number (PIN) �j' ?�i °�4 � J l���l j Legal description: h�U�/ ��i���,��� b� ��E �'�''�. � �c��� '�� �� Lot Block Tract/Addition Current zoning: � Square footage/acreage ?�i d,�O Reason for special use permi� l��/1-I ,�i�yO�Sra-� �d�Fi�.ox . �t1�'1d � � �'�� .�i�a �� �.�''u y,�:,,+o '° �'c�t.� � l�%�ii.� L�^.�� Section of City Code: Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? Yes No � If yes, which city? �.,,1 If yes, what type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes . No �EE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners NAME t�i ��► ��ic�i7�.; . ADDRESS I ,tr�t�, `''.�``t � � SIGNATURE PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME ��� -��; /�!'._ ADDRESS SIGNATURE Fee: $400.00 ✓ " $100.(}D Permit SP # � �!0 �, l � Application received by: � Scheduled Planning Co ' on te: Scheduied City Council date: this form prior to processing) # DAYTIlVIE PHONE �;� � "��°�� � DATE / I � lB'�� YTIME PHONE uZ_-3��% I DATE for residential2nd accessory buildings 1996 MEETING DATES �� PLANNING COMMISSION - 7:30 P.M. Wednesday: * January 3rd * January 17th * February 7th * February 21st * March 6th * March 20th * April3rd � * .. April 17th � • * 1VIay lst � , * ° May lSth � * June Sth * June 19th * July 10th * July 24th * August 7th * August 21st * September 4th * September 18th * October 2nd * October 16th * * * * November 6th November 20th December 4th December 18th . . . .I ,