PL 12/20/1995 - 7088"`�
CITY OF FRIDLEY
ACENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 20, 1995 7:30 paM.
LOCATION: Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E.
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES: November 1, 1995
PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A� SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #95-1p BY
BWBR ARCHITECTS FOR UNITY HOSPITAL•
Per Section 205.07.01.C.(8) of the Fridley City Code, to allow expansion of a hospital
in an R-1, Single Family Dwelling district, generally located at 550 Osbome Road N.E.
APPROVE 1996 MEETINC, DATES
�� RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUTY & ENERGY
COMMISSION MEETING OF OCTOBER i7 1995
RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETI(dG OF OCTOBER
24, 1995
RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING
OF NOVEMBER 6 1995
RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSiON MEETING OF NOVEMBER
7, 1995
RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MEETING OF NOVEMBER 9 1995
RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER
21. 1995
OTHER BUSINESS:
ADJOURNMENT
�
�
r"1
,�
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COMMIgBION MEETING, NOVEMBER 1, 1995
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Newman called the November 1, 1995, Planning
Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL•
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Dave Newman, Dave Kondrick, Diane Savage,
LeRoy Oquist, Dean Saba, Connie Modig
Brad Sielaff
Others Present: Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
Dennis Zylla, Northco
A1 Quam, 399 - 73rd Avenue N.E.
Jim Holmen, 7310 Tempo Terrace
John Allen, Industrial Equities
APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 18 1995 PLANNING COMMISSION MINTJTES:
Mr. lJewman requested the following additions to the minutes:
Page 5, after the second paragraph, add the statement, pNo one
from the public appeared.for this item."
Page 6, after the first paragraph, add the statement, pNo one
appeared other than the petitioner who was available to answer
questions.��
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr, Oquist, to approve the
October 18, 1995, Planning Commission minutes as amended.
IIPON A VOICS VOTL, ALL VOTINQ AYE, CHAIRPLR80N NEW��i DECLARSD
THE MOTION CARRIED D�NIMOIIBI.Y.
1. CONSIDERATION.OF A VACATION REOIIEST SAV #95-05 BY
INDUSTRIAL EOIIITIES: �
To vacate those particular 20.00 foot drainage and utility
easements originally dedicated on the recorded plats of
Northco Business Park and Northco Business Park 2nd Addition
and now to be vacated which lie within Lots 1 and 2, Block
1, in said Northco Business Park and Lot 2, Block l, said
Northco Business Park 2nd Addition and lying southerly of
the northerly 20.00 feet of said lots. The centerline of
said 20.00 foot easement is descri.bed as follows:
Commencing at the most southerly corner of said Lot i;
thence northwesterly, along the southwesterly line of said
Lot l, a distance of 62.51 feet; to the intersection with
the westerly line of said Lot 1(said intersection
pLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING NOVEMBER 1 1995 PAG$ 2
hereinafter referred to as �Point Ap); thence southeasterly,
along a line passing through a point on a southeasterly line of
said Lot 2, Block l, Northco Business Park distant 29.00 feet
southwesterly from said most southerly corner, a distance of
85.00 feet, to the point of beginning of the centerline to be
described; thence northwesterly, a distance of 85.00 feet, to the
above referenced "Point A"; thence northerly, along the westerly
line of said Lot 1, a distance of 379.40 feet and said centerline
there terminating, generally located at the southwest corner of
73rd Avenue and Northco Drive.
Ms. McPherson stated an informal hearing is being held to
consider a vacation request by Industrial Equities. The location
of the request is at the intersection of 73rd Avenue and the East
University Avenue service drive. The property spans two legally
described lots. The petitioner is requesting that the City .
approve the vacation of a 20.00 foot drainage and utility
easement which runs in a north/south direction through the middle.
of the subject parcel. The purpose of the vacation request is to
allow construction of an 87,000 square foot multi-tenant
speculative industrial building. The building is 600 feet
fronting 73rd Avenue and 160 feet in the north/south direction.
Currently located i.n the utility easement, which is 20.00 feet
wide (10.00 feet on either side of the lot line), is a 24-ir�ch
storm sewer line which connects with the storm water system from
Northco Drive to 73rd Avenue. The petitioner has developed plans
to voluntarily reiocate this storm sewer line in such a manner as
the water will go through a drainage pond, through a pipe across
the southwesterly right-of-way into another pond along the west
side of the site, and finally connecting via anather pipe into
the storm water system on 73rd Avenue. The Engineering
Department has no objections to the proposed plan by the
petitioner. The request does not adversely impact the storm
water system €or the City.
Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends the Planning Commission
recommend approval of the request with the following
stipulations: � �
1. The petitioner
system from the
the parking lot
of 73rd Avenue
shall maintain the storm water drainage
manhole located in the southeast corner of
and the outlet located at the intersection
and the East University Avenue Service Road.
2. The petitioner shall execute and record against the property
a storm water pond maintenance agreement. �
Ms. McPherson stated, as presented, the site plan does meet the
requirements of the M-2, Heavy Industrial District, with the
exception of the loading docks which face Narthco Drive. The
petitioner will be processing a variance request, which will be
�
�"�
� r",,
,-r-� PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING NOVEMBER 1 1995 PAGE 3
reviewed by the Appeals Commission next week, regardinq the
location of the loading docks.
Ms. Savage asked if a recommendation for approval would need a
stipulation contingent upon that approval.
Ms. McPherson stated no. The petitioner could redesign the
building so that there were no loading docks facing the right-of-
way.
Mr. Newman asked if the two lots would be combined into one tax
parcel and if that needed to be part of this approval process.
Ms. McPherson stated yes, the lots would be combined into one tax
parcel. This can be done as part of the aclministrative process.
The petitioner is seeking tax increment financinq for some soil
correction. The combining of the parcels would be handled
through that process.
Mr. Zylla stated represented the Fridley Business Center
partnership, which is the seller of the land. They also had to
siqn a petition in support of the vacation. He is attending the
meeting to express the partnership's support of what the
� petitioner is proposing. They are prepared to answer whatever
questions he can as part of this process. They are not directly
tied into the application for planning approval, but they are
aware of the need for $ variance. The storm sewer 3s a situation
that no one foresaw when the property was platted. With the
market being what it is, the petitioner is more interested in
developing a more linear, high bay building and the storm sewer
is basically in the way. He received a copy of the meeting
minutes of the Rice Creek Watershed District, which suppo=ts the
request. There is no adverse watershed i.mpact. What the
petitioner is proposing is probably somewhat of ar� enhancement to
the sedimentation issue that typically watershed districts are �
concerned about. The proposed system would provide more
filtration of the water thraugh the system of ponds. He did not
see any adverse environmental impact. The vacation is primarily
. a convenience for the development of the property for intended
use.
Mr. Newman asked if the closing had taken place.
Mr. Zylla stated no.
Mr. Newman asked if there was any reason the Planninq Commission
would need to make the vacation contingent upon any events.
Mr. Zylla stated, between now and the City.Council meeting, they
�'�1 may have a closinq. If that does not occur, they would want the
actual publication of the meeting notice og official action be
PLANNING COMMI88ION MESTING NOVEMBBR 1 1995 PAaE 4 �
postponed until closing occurs. He did not want to complicate
this proceeding because they are confident that this will happen.
Mr. Newman asked staff if this should be included as a
stipulation. .
Ms. McPherson suggested making note of the concern. She will
talk with Ms. Dacy, Mr. Zylla and the petitioner, and schedule
the ordinance.publication accordingly, A formal public hearing
still needs to be established before the City Council. At their
meeting of November 13, the Council would establish a public
hearing for November 27. The first reading of the ordinance
would not occur until December and the second reading in January.
Officially, the publication of the ordinance would not occur
until perhaps the second week in January which should give the
petitioner ample time to resolve the issues regarding closing.
Mr. Zylla stated they will be closing or the petitioner will be
escrowing funds in anticipation of starting some of the work such
as footings and foundatipn or providing some assurance that h�
will close. He daes not see a problem in putting on a condition
that approval is subject to closing.
Mr. Quam asked for an explanation of the process and a review of
the dates.
Mr. Newman reviewed the process in detail, the date for
establishing a public hearing and the date of the actual public
hearing.
Mr. Quam stated he was here to object. He sees two variance
requests for this. If the Commission were to recommend approval,
he would hope that it would be contingent upon the setback of the,
project. Several of us in.Melody Manor who live right across the.
street would spend the rest of our lives looking at this. All
the properties along 73rd Avenue were developed with a good
setback and with ample screening, and this property is not.
Mr. Newman asked staff if the variances would be heard by the
City Council at the same time.
Ms. McPherson stated the variance does not require a public
hearing before the Council. If the Council is looking at an item
and there are people present who wish to speak at the meeting,
this would probably not occur until the December meeting.
Assuming staff recommends approval of an ordinance to vacate this
easement, then the variance would be brought before the Council
at that time. Only one variance has been requested which will be
considered by the Appeals Commission on November 7.
-'"� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVSMBER 1 1995 PAG$ 5
Mr. Allen stated he was the developer of this property. There is
a variance requested for the truck side facing Northco Drive. It
is a rather unique ordinance in the City in considering that side
of the building the front drive. Because of the calculations on
square footage and distance, they probably need a variance to
make sure they are safe in that regard. They have screened the
trucks from 73rd. With reqard to the vacation of the storm
sewer, they are proposing to vacate the easement that goes under
the building currently. They are proposing to take the water
that comes off of the public street through a pond, through a
second pond, and then to the storm water system. From the
standpoint of water quality, he felt they were doing something
that does not currently exist and enhancing the quality of the
water going into the retention area.
Mr. Allen stated the building complies with the setback
requirements. It complies with every aspect of the development
that was signed with the City of Fridley and Northco Development.
The only variance being requested is for the truck dock area.
They intend to keep the trucks in the back of the building. They
are trying to project a first class campus image and attract good
tenants. They do a good job with landscaping and berming. They
have similar projects in the area for which they are willing to
� provide addresses. They are very conscientious of the residents
and will work with residents.
Mr. Holman stated he had concerns about the width of tiie berm and
the bike path. .
Mr. Allen.stated, because these were not part of the discussion
for the vacation request, he would respond to Mr. Holman�s
questions at a later �ime.
MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Savage, to recommend approval
of a Vacation Request, SAV �95-05, by Industrial Equities, to
vacate those particular 20.00 foot drainage and utility easements
originally dedicated on the recorded plats of Northco Business
Park and Northco Business Park 2nd Addition and now to be vacated
which lie within Lots 1 and 2, Bl�k 1, in said Northco business
Park and Lot 2, Block 1, said Northco Business Park 2nd Addition
and lyinq southerly of the northerly 20.00 feet of said lots.
The centerline of said 20.00 foot easement is described as
follows:. Commencing at the most southerly corner of said Lot 1;
thence northwesterly, along the southwesterly line of said Lot 1,
a distance of 62.51 feet, to the intersection with the westerly
line of said Lot 1(said intersection hereinafter re€erred to as
"Point A��j; thence southeasterly, along a line passing through a
point on a southeasterly line of said Lot 2, Block l, Northco
�,,,� Business Park distant 29.00 feet southwesterly from said most
southerly corner, a distance of 85.00 feet, to the point of
beqinninq of the centerline to be described; thence
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. NOVEMBER 1, 1995 PAGE 6 ^
northwesterly, a distance of 85.00 feet, to the above referenced
"Point AN; thence northerly, along the westerly line of said Lot
1, a distance of 379.40 feet and said centerline there
terminating, generally located at the southwest corner of 73rd
Avenue and Northco Drive, with the following stipulations:
1. The petitioner shall maintain the storm water drainage
system from the manhole located in the southeast corner of
the parking lot and the outlet located at the intersection
of 73rd Avenue and the East IIniversity Avenue Servi.ce Road.
2. The petitioner shall execute and record against the property
a storm water pond maintenance agreement.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, AI�L VOTINt� AYl�, CHAIRPERSON NLWMAN DLCLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
Mr. Newman stated the Appeale Commission would address the issue
of a variance request on November 7; and the City Council will
conduct a public hearing on the vacation request on November 27.
2. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PARRS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 11. 1995
^
OTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to receive the
minutes of the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of
September 11, 1995.
UPON A VOICE VOTl:, ALL VOTING AYB, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAI�T DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOIISLY.
ADJOURNMENT
OM TION by Mr. Rondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to adjourn the
meeting.
IIPON A VOICF VOTE, ALL VOTINQr AYS, CHAIRPERBOH �TE�MAN DLCLARED
THE MOTIOIJ CARRIED AND TH8 NOVEMBER 1� 1995� PLANNINa COMMIBSION
MEETINt� ADJOIIRNED AT 7i55 P.M. �
Respectfully submitted,
� � ��11
Lavonn Cooper
Recording Searetary
A 1
�'"� S I G N— IN S H E E T
PLANNING COMMISSION:MEETING, Wednesday, November 1, 1995
� ';
:t Name Address/Business �
���� fa-� � �..� � �,��
� � �' �' �3 � A �-
� `,l�i-, � � ;* . �,.a�_ � F.�.. �.r � � � � � � _..� :.� t-Y 1 �..� . ^s ��" E� � . , �:�, m �
C,/ e -
�
0
��
DESCRIPTION OF REQUESI:
The Petitioner requests that a special use permit l� approved to allow a small addition to the
front of the hospital. The purpose of the addition is to consolidate phazmacy and radiology
seivices. Consolidation of these services w�71 allow the creation of an Ambulatory Care Unit (see
body of report for furtlier explanation). The total increase in square footage of the hospital
footprint w�l be 3,750 square feet
SUr1VIlVIARY OF ISSUES:
Section 205.07.O1.C. (8) of the City Code requires a special use permit for hospitals, clinics,
nuising homes, convalescent homes and homes for the elderly in the R-1, Single Fam1y Dwelling
Distric�
The proposed addition w71 have no impact on the adjacent residential properties located to the
east, south, and west of the hospital complex.. No setbacks w�l be affected. Six parking spaces
will be lost as a result of the addition, however, there is adequa.te space on the properiy for
additional parking should the City deem it nec�ssary. The City should reserve the right to
require additional parking spaces should demand require it
RECOMIVIENDED ACTIONS:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commercial recommend approval of the special use permit
request to the City Council with the following stipulation:
1. The City reseives the right to require additional parking spaces should the need warrant it.
�
Staff Report /"�,
SP #95-10, by BWBR Architects
Page 2
PROJECT DETAILS
Petition For. Special Use Permit to allow expansion of a hospital facility in an R-1,
Single Family Dwelling District
Location
of Property:
Legal Description
of Property:
Size:
Topography:
Existing
Vegetation:
Existing
Zoning/Platting:
Availability
of Municipal
Utilities:
Vehicular
Access:
Pedestrian
Access:
Engineering
Issues:
550 Osbome Road N.E.
Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 11, Township 30,
Range 24
31 acres
Flat
Typical suburban; sod, landscaping, trees, etc.
Metes and Bounds, date unknown, R-1, Single Family Dwelling
Connected
Osbome Road, Monroe Street
Bike�uvay and sidewalk along Osbome Road
None
2
�"�
,�
J
�taff Report
�P #95-10, by BWBR Architects
Page 3
Site Planning
Issues:
Request
DEVELOPMENT SITE
The petitioner requests that a special use permit be issued to allow the expansion of the e�asting
hospital facility. This expansion will allow the consolidation of the radiology (x ray) department, the
existing inpatierrt and communiiy pharrnacies, and the cre�ation of an Ambulatory Care Unit An
Ambulatory Care Unit is for patierrts t1�t will walk-in, have a procedure done, and go I�me. The
length of stay may be anywhere from 2 to 10-12 hours. Example.s of such procedur� include IV
treatmer�ts, endoscopies, miscellaneous diagnostics, or minor surgery (not a common occurrer�ce).
The purpose of the creation of this Unit is to separate out-patierrt, short�errn care �i�ts from in-
patierrt, long term care patierrt.s. The total square f�tage of expansion will be 3,750 square feet. The
expansion will result in removal of one of three canopies in frorrt of the hospifial.
HiStON
,-�he hospital was originally constructe,c! in 1965. Additions occurred in 1970, 1971, 1980, 1�2, 1985
�,.solarium), 1985 (addition to medical cerrte�, 1991, and 199;i. Also I�ated on the property is a
mairrtenance garage. In 1993, the hospital also installed a traffic light on Osbome Road and
constructed a new parking lot/revised e�asting driving aisl�.
Analysis
The proposec! add'rqon does not impact the zoning requiremer�s or adjacerrt properti�. Six paridng
spaces will be lost from in frorrt of the hospital building, however, these spaces could be constructed
elsewhere on the site should the City require additional paridng space.s. The parldng spaces will be
lost as a r�uft of the canopy being closed ar� the neec! to reroute traffic orrto a diff�errt driveway.
Rerouting this tr�ffic will actually improve traffic flow in frorrt of the hospital� as it elimirrat� traffic
cor�flicts in front of the Emergency Canopy; the most easteriy r,anopy in front of the hospital. The
Ciiy has not received complairrts regar�ding the parking supply. The City should r�re the right to
require additional parking should complairrts be recenre.cl.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the request to the City
Council, with the following stipulation:
i. The City resenre� the right to require additional parking should demand of the facility warrant it
�
3
Staff Report
SP #95-10, by BWBR Architects
Page 4
WEST:
SOUII-I:
EAST:
NORTH:
Comprehensive
Planning Issues:
Public Hea�ing
Comments:
ADJACENT SITES
Zoning: R-1, Single Family
Zoning: R-1, Singie Family
Zoning: R-1, Single Family
CR-1, General Office
Zoning: Unknowm
4
Land Use: R�idenfial
Land Use: Residential
Land Use: Nursing Home
Medical Ciinic
Land Use: Spring Lake Park
a
�
�,
�
/"�
�� �� �
�
swsR ARCHITECTS November 17, 1995
City of Fridley
Community Development Department
6431 University Avenue, NE
Fridley, MN 55432
\rrhi�rcturr • Intrriur �>��,��_„ RE: Unity Hospital
� Ambulaxory Care Center
BWBR Commission No. 95060
Dear Council Members:
The scope of this project is to facilitate a new Ambulatory Care Service while
integrating and renovating the existing procedural areas such as Radiology,
� including C.T. and M.RI. services.
Since the 1993 Surgery Expansion and Renovation, the old O.R areas have
been vacated and will now be developed into the Ambulatory Service Center.
Service requirements for the provisions of care to these patients have intensified
as new procednres, treatments, and technologies are developed and
implemented. To accommodate this, the team is developing a cohesive
ambulatory service program.
�Sihlct $Urrl SUiir �11(I
1'aul. Alinnr.���a ��Iul
� , i , , , � � � � i i
��
The Pharmaceutical Department will also be consolidating their functions to one
location, which will be the expansion' westward from their existing Surgery area
near the Emergency Services entrance. This consolidation of the department
will occur in the courtyard just east of Emergency Services and direcdy west of
where the existing Inpatient Discharge area is located at the north facade of the
Hospital.
Outside of the Ambulatory Service Center, there will be some moderate
renovation and remodeling of the existing Radiology Department. Included in
this scope is primarily suppoR space changes while maintaining, through
phasing, the four existing X-ray Procedure areas.
Related to the existing Radiology Department is the relocation of the rnobile
M.R.I. to a iixed location, and the relocation of an existing C.T. Exam Room.
City of Fridley
November 17, 1995
Page 2
�
The relocation of these two spaces, along with their support areas, will be
situated where the existing canopy and entrance currently designed as "inpatient
discharge".
Lnpact to the north facade of the exterior will be:
• Loss of six parking spaces.
• Increased footprint of building by 3,750 sq. ft
• New addition will increase by 8' to the north of where existing canopy is
carrently located.
• The new addition will be designed to integrate with the existing facade.
Currently the Hospital is not experiencing any parking problems and does not
foresee any future problems based on the consolidation and renovation of these
spaces for this project
As illustrated in the atta.ched graphics, the impact in plan as well as exterior
should � minimal. This design will reflect the needs to consider the human ,-1
scale proportions and detail in order to successfully fulfill the objectives set
fourth by our Clien�
Sincerely yours,
BWBR ARCHITECTS, INC.
Michael D. Boldenow
Project Architect
Attachment
,�
17 November, 1995 BWBR Arclutects, Inc. il-17LTR.DOC
' ��
3
!
-�
�
,;.�
3
.'.;�
t")
:,�.�.���'S
�.�i
_ ... _ _. ...._"_". .._.. . —. .. "". e i ' ..
t
. � � . ��i ;-.
:'�
_ �` ` \
1,; �. 4
�
. . __ , .. . . .. , , •� \ 1�
.J n
� � r �f y7 �,
�.� - . � . . . , _��
. . . . . ..:�-�
SP 4�95-10
BRBR Architects
...... __ .._.. .' _. _ _ _ _ .". . .. ' _. ..... ._ '. '. . . �i.
y I r � �
: �
: .,n-..—:7 � - _ _ P .
. 7 j - j F{
._i ' . J . ., �.. _ - _ . .- _ - - - : -1 i
--. . _ .�. . __.. . ..., _ i :� a
- --' �
_ _ - 7- - _.�.. ` _ ._ _ +
,
__ � �. --
..,.. , , -_:_;.
_ , _ _ � . � . _ I 'i
-�
. _ _" _ f_ .. ... .. � . _ . . . .' i.'�
.._ -.. _.. l._. . . . , - __'i .
+ _. . .
.. ... . . . t.. _ . E .�,�
' - .. .. - . ..
_ ' ' . "_ L'._ . ...._ . .L. '.' ' "
._ . — . . . . .._ . r —. . ..t— � — �
f t �
.. _ r._. .,-- ..r_ . '. _. c
� ._. .._ . _ : . _... ._. ._i �i
-�:! � ...-_.... k�.,..'�s": �'"'"� C....^a:;:k r,:_"�:..:�� �°� `. �s �..^.''..�<`
• r :
_ _r: '
� � \ . � ��� . �. `� .
.� .� t _ .
k_. .. . . ��� � � -.�~ . . . ,. �
: t`_" -
!:
.� r .r�°'..._: --
.���
.+'`i „``�w
N�t G�,4NC��
IN P,4i�CINC�:
- � 5P,4C�5
I ,
„
Sheet Title Drawn Date Comm. No. Sheet No.
CJ ( � ��1 � I111i/9� 95060�0 . �
.iject
UNITY HOSPITAL
A M BULATO RY CARE CENTER
4�0 Sibley Street, Suite 500
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
612-222-3701
Copyr�ght BWBR Architects
1`�
� �`i�
�!
��
�
ii �
i� :�
;
�
�.
;:
EX18TI1� �IIIG�It�s
rl :�"� Y/ V�Y� 1 Ii'
�_- .__� �1:
i
, ,�- .
�
I
' :-..
."_ "__..._.._.. "".. _.. –:�- .'.
'ti_I_"___._.—"— _.�.
�I p
� : �'9
- _.�:�.
;i
! i I- �
` ��_�.�
i:= __..-_..����,`:
���
- ---- _-- ..�.�--��;��:.�� —^ — —�r � ��
� a / i,�,
b il _,,
.� ` �� :i
�,r - ,�.e,�.....�.,�...d..m.. �� �'�
i �.1
--_'___. __.--:__—. __-`
r' .,
�_�_._
----'----`- �--�---- .. : �'•-- : �
� �''-� '__"'_'���!` i -
ti ( �i-__C...c.,.._,._.
:f' ,,
'�i_.,"..� � �, _-'�'��
� �, �� ' � _
--'a- . � '��,� �y
..� •. _� .-:�r: _-.,
w
--� ' �"'{' �_ �
f`� � �_ � t,,.
� � . I.. '� a _ � i
� ,�.--.�-`�' ��
_ � r_._ J. _,�„� �
i{�
� ;I,"."t,�� .�;
SP 4�95-10
_y; . . ..:-; i .
,
�,
, _� � •---
+�
�-t_--='�-=,t
i '`
_• f "_ . 1 ='� t-..—e x
� � �� � _ }�-,�i
, i�
• '.
Sheet Title D�awn Date Comm. No. Sheet No:
FLOOi2 PL,4N n�,� �m�m.mm 2
Project
UNITY HOSPITAL
A M B U L ATO R Y CAFiE CENTER
4d0 Sibley Street, Snite 500
Saint Paul, Minneaota 55101
812-222-3781
Copyright BWBR Architects
1�1P
� �i�
�
�r �r7�—�U
RWRR Architects
��
�
Sheet Title Qrawn � Date Comm. No. Sheet No.
NORt� �1.�YATION r►,� �im�� �0.�m 3
UN1TY HOSPITAL
A M B U L ATO R Y CARE CENT�
4� Sibley 3treet, Suite 500
Saint Paul, Minneaota 55101
612-222-3701
Cop}right BWBR Architects
1`1�'
BMYBtf A�T�T8
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the
Fridley Planning Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431
University Avenue N.E. on Wednesday, December 20,. 1995 at 7:30
p.m. for the purpose of: '
Consideration of a Special Use Permit,
SP �95-10, by BWBR Architects for Unity
Hospital, per Section 205.07.O1.C.(8) of the
Fridley City Code, to allow expansion of a
hospital in an R-1, Single Family Dwelling
district, generally located at 550 Osborne
Road N.E.
Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an
interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require
auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no
later than December 13, 1995.
Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an
opportunity at the above stated time and place. Any questions
related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community
Development Department at 572-3593.
DAVID NEWMAN
CHAIR
PLANNING COMMISSION
Publish: December 7, 1995
December 14, 1995
�
�
�
�
,-_, CITY OF FRIDLEY
� 6431 UNIVERSTTY AVENUE N.E.
FRIDLEY, MN 55432
'�
(612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
PROPERTY INFORMATIOI�I - site plan required for submittal; see attached
Address: 7' � � t� r ` /Y� �?a �..� .� Z-
r
Property Identifica on Number (PIN) �j' ?�i °�4 � J l���l j
Legal description: h�U�/ ��i���,��� b� ��E �'�''�. � �c��� '�� ��
Lot Block Tract/Addition
Current zoning: � Square footage/acreage ?�i d,�O
Reason for special use permi� l��/1-I ,�i�yO�Sra-� �d�Fi�.ox . �t1�'1d � � �'�� .�i�a �� �.�''u
y,�:,,+o '° �'c�t.� � l�%�ii.� L�^.�� Section of City Code:
Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license?
Yes No � If yes, which city?
�.,,1 If yes, what type of business?
Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes . No
�EE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title)
(Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners
NAME t�i ��► ��ic�i7�.; .
ADDRESS I ,tr�t�, `''.�``t � �
SIGNATURE
PETITIONER INFORMATION
NAME ��� -��; /�!'._
ADDRESS
SIGNATURE
Fee: $400.00 ✓ " $100.(}D
Permit SP # � �!0 �, l
� Application received by: �
Scheduled Planning Co ' on te:
Scheduied City Council date:
this form prior to processing)
#
DAYTIlVIE PHONE �;� � "��°��
� DATE / I � lB'��
YTIME PHONE uZ_-3��% I
DATE
for residential2nd accessory buildings
1996 MEETING DATES
��
PLANNING COMMISSION - 7:30 P.M.
Wednesday:
* January 3rd
* January 17th
* February 7th
* February 21st
* March 6th
* March 20th
* April3rd �
* .. April 17th �
• * 1VIay lst
�
, * ° May lSth �
* June Sth
* June 19th
* July 10th
* July 24th
* August 7th
* August 21st
* September 4th
* September 18th
* October 2nd
* October 16th
*
*
*
*
November 6th
November 20th
December 4th
December 18th
. . . .I ,