Loading...
PL 02/15/1995 - 30803r--, ,� CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNINa COI�IIBBION MEETINa, FEBRIIARY 15, 1995 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Newman called the February 15, 1995, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Members Absent: Others Present: Dave Newman, Dave Rondrick, LeRoy Oquist, Diane Savage, Dean Saba Brad Sielaff, Connie Modig Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Gary Vander Vorst, Erickson Oil Products ,APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 1. �.995, PLANNING COMMIS3ION MINUTES: MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve the February 1, 1995, Planning Commission minutes as written. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIN(� AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. APPROVAL OF AGEATDA: MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Ms. Savage, to approve the agenda. OPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEi�MAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SP #95-01. BY ERICKSON OIL PRODUCTS: Per Section 205.14.O1.C.(5) of the Fridley City Code, to allow construction of a motor vehicle fuel dispensing service, convenience store, and car wash, on Lot 1, Block 1, Commerce Park, generally located at 7600 University Avenue N.E. (Conoco) MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERBON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC BEARING OPEN AT 7s33 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated the request for a special use permit is for the property located at 7600 University Avenue N.E. The property is '"'� zoned C-2, General Business District and is currently the - location of a Conoco convenience store/motor fuel operation. The ^ PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. FEBRIIARY 15, 1995 PAGE 2 property is located just south of Osborne Road and west of University Avenue, and is bordered on the west by a service road to University Avenue. Mr. Hickok stated the request is to modify the site by removing the current building and constructing a new structure, modifying the islands and pumping locations, and modifying the landscaping. On the existing site plan, the bituminous surface extends to the property lines. On the Osborne Road side, the property currently has two access drives. The proposed plan would close one access drive onto Osborne Road. The proposed access drive would be centered along the property and would provide a better distance from the University service road. The propoaed plan also provides for another access drive on the University service road. Mr. Hickok reviewed the proposed site plan. The proposed building is situated in such a way to allow the pumps to be on the north side of the building. This also increases the landscaped area by pulling back some of the hard surface from the property line. In doing so, there is more area for landscape materials which will soften the impact of the building. The fuel tanks will be located at the northeast corner of the site. ,r� Mr. Hickok stated staff considered the fact that the Code requires a 20-foot setback from the property line surrounding the site. Along the University Avenue side, the setback has been reduced to 5 feet to help with traffic circulation and to alleviate the hardship of having roads on all sides of the property. This is probably the best side to reduce the setback because of the large boulevard. There is still a plan to maintain adequate landscaping along the University Avenue side. The Appeals Commission considered the request and approved it as submitted. Mr. Hickok stated staff, during their review, observed the tank location. There was information in the file going back to 1984 regarding the tank location, and concern about having trucks that come in to fill the tanks and block traffic. With the setback variance, it does allow trucks to fill the tanks at this location while allowing traffic to circulate properly. Mr. Hickok showed the elevations for the building design. From an architectural standpoint, staff are pleased with the appearance of the building. Mr. Hickok stated, as staff reviewed the request, there were some concerns as they relate to a motor fuel and car wash operation. An operation such as this tends to have a higher number of signs than other types of operations. The petitioner has submitted a preliminary sign package. Staff are reviewing this information which appears to be in compliance. Staff recommends approval of � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETIN�, FEHRIIARY 15, 1995 PAdE 3 the request with the following stipulations: 1. 2. All signs shall be reviewed and approved by staff to assure compliance wit Chapter 214 of the City Code. The petitioner shall install underground irrigation if it doea not already exist. 3. The petitioner shall submit a performance bond in the amount of 30 of the construction costs prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. The petitioner shall submit the requested hydraulic calculations. 5. The petitioner shall comply with all outdoor sales and storage requirements in Chapter 205 of the Fridley City Code. 6. Proper signage will be required to direct waiting cars to allow vehicles to enter and exit the site, while other vehicles wait to enter the wash. � Mr. Hickok stated stipulation #6 addressed a concern about the stacking distance for the car wash and what that does to the access from the west. Perhaps this can be accomplished by posting a sign not to block that access drive. Also, to the north the petitioner is proposing one access along Osborne. Staff would like to have the County submit in writing their approval of this plan to be sure it is consistent with the County's plan to improve Osborne in the future. The County plans to add a turn lane in the future. Staff is proposinq stipulation #7 to be sure the petitioner is not in conflict with the proposed turn lane. 7. The County shall submit in writing their approval of the petitioner's site plan to verify it is consistent with the County's plan for future improvements to Osborne Road. Mr. Kondrick stated the site plan at the exit to the car wash shows a large tree. Would this affect visibility? Mr. Hickok stated staff talked to the petitioner about this. Staff are concerned about the cars exiting the car wash and having clear visibility. Staff will review plans to assure there will be low plantings at this location in order to insure appropriate visibility. Mr. Kondrick asked if there was sufficient parking for employees and for customers who stop at the convenience but who do not purchase gasoline. . � PLANNINa COMMISBION MEETIN�. FEHRIIARY 15. 1995 PAG� 4 Mr. Hickok stated the code requires 25 parking spaces based on the 3,615 square foot footprint of the building. By counting the parking spaces and the spaces at the pumping islands, the petitioner does meet the code requirement of 25 spaces. Staff has historically allowed operations such as this to count pump spaces as parking spaces. The industry experience has been that this is adequate parking. Mr. Rondrick stated he mentions this because another gas station in the City has a number of parking spaces for employees and patrons. Those spaces seem to be occupied with customers doing business other than purchasing gasoline. Mr. Vander Vorst stated the company has taken this into consideration. There are some parking spaces to the south and west of the building and by the tanks. Their experience has been that most customers are parking at the islands and then go in to pay for that purchase and pick up other items. Ms. Savage asked if the operation would have a cash machine. Mr. Vander Vorst stated yes. � Mr. Kondrick stated there are numerous other functions that take place at a gas station and wanted to make sure this has been considered. Mr. Vander Vorst stated a firm they have worked with in the past has reviewed the plan. This is the best plan they could come up with for this location. Mr. Newman asked how many stacking spaces are provided for the car wash. Mr. Hickok stated they anticipate there are probably five stacking spaces with the fifth car in the driving aisle. Mr. Kondrick asked what type of car wash they would have. Mr. Vander Vorst stated this would be an automatic car wash with cloth brushes. The car wash would not be manned. The number of employees at this location would be typically three employees which includes two cashiers and a manager. He did not know if there was any parking nearby that the employees could use. Ms. Savage asked how the access from Osborne is different. Mr. Hickok stated the current site has two access drives close to the intersections. The proposed plan has one access more in the ^� center. This is felt to be a more optimum location. The access to the south has also been redesigned. One of the benefits of � PLANNINa COMMISSION MEETING FEBRIIARY 15, 1995 PAGE 5 pulling that access back is that it creates a curve in the drive thus discouraging drivers from using the site as a shortcut to the intersection. Mr. Hickok stated, in order to give the Commission a sense of the parking, he visited two Erickson Oil Products sites to see what their parking situation was. In both cases, they had a similar number of parking stalls and, in both cases, they were given credit for the parking at the pumps. When he visited the sites on a weekend, there did not appear to be problems. The pumps and guest parking seemed to function properly. He however was not there at a heavy car wash time. Mr. Newman asked if the special use permit was for all functions including the gas station, convenience store and car wash. Mr. Hickok stated the special use permit was for fuel and car wash operations. The zoning is correct for a convenience store in this location without a special use permit. Mr. Oquist asked if a special use permit would be required if the operation is just a gas/service station. � Mr. Hickok stated, if someone were go to reuse or remodel the existing building, they would not need to go through the process because the special use permit goes with the land. This request is being reviewed because the site is being cleared and redeveloped. ^ Mr. Vander Vorst stated, on behalf of Erickson Oil Products, they are proud of their company and pleased with the proposed design. He felt the photographs presented did not do justice to their facility. The copper-colored roof and the brick building is aesthetically pleasing. They are anxious to become a part of the community. Mr. Oquist asked if the City needed to include anything in the special use permit regarding removal of the existing tanks. Mr. Hickok stated the State has very tight regulations regarding the removal of tanks, and staff feels the City has a safety net there for the removal. Mr. Oquist asked if the State regulations also cover the proper installation of the new tanks. Mr. Hickok stated yes. With the redevelopment of the site, the new installation will include modern tanks and the installation must meet State requirements. � PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING, FEBRIIARY 15. 1995 PAGE 6 � Mr. Vander Vorst stated the underground storage tanks are installed according to EPA and MPCA guidelines. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Savage, to receive into the minutes a letter dated December 28, 1994, from Mr. Michael Blackburn, Branded Marketing Manager, Conoco, Inc. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CBAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. OTION by Mr. Rondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERBON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARI1Ja CL08ED AT 7:55 P.M. Ms. Savage stated she would recommend approval. She heard the matter at the Appeals Commission meeting and thought the proposal would be an asset to the community. She was impressed with the architectural design and is particularly impressed with the plan for more green space. This is a corner where there is a need for a gas station, there is a need for a car wash, and she would recommend approval with the seven stipulations. MoTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend approval of Special Use Permit, SP #95-01, to allow construction of a motor vehicle fuel dispensing service, convenience store, and car wash, on Lot 1, Block 1, Commerce Park, generally located at 7600 University Avenue N.E. (Conoco), with the following stipulations: 1. All signs shall be reviewed and approved by staff to assure compliance wit Chapter 214 of the City Code. 2. The petitioner shall install underground irrigation if it does not already exist. 3. The petitioner shall submit a performance bond in the amount of 3% of the construction costs prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. The petitioner shall submit the requested hydraulic calculations. 5. The petitioner shall comply with all outdoor sales and storage requirements in Chapter 205 of the Fridley City Code. 6. Proper signage will be required to direct waiting cars to allow vehicles to enter and exit the site, while other � vehicles wait to enter the wash. � PLANNINa COMMI88ION MBETING. FEBRIIARY 15. 1995 PAdE 7 7. The petitioner shall submit documentation that Anoka County has reviewed and approved the new access onto Osborne Road. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTINd AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIIBLY. Mr. Hickok stated the City Council at their February 27 meeting would establish the public hearing and the public hearing would be held on March 13. 2. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION P±IEETING OF JANUARY 9. 1995 Mr. Kondrick stated the Parks & Recreation Commission has a new member, Sue Price, whom he feels will be asset to the Commission. Ms. M. J. Schreiner has resigned from the Commission and she will be missed. Efforts are underway to secure another member for the Commission. MOTION by Mr. Rondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to receive the Parks & Recreation Commission minutes of January 9, 1995. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIN(i AYE, CHAIRPERBON NEWMAN DECLARED .� THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 3. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETI_NG OF JANUARY 12. 1995 MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to receive the Housing & Redevelopment Authority minutes of January 12, 1995. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTINa AYE, CHAIRPER80N NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIIBLY. 4. RECEIVE THE MINiJTES OF THE EIWIRONMENTAL OUALITY & ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 17 1995 MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Savage, to receive the Environmental Quality & Energy Commission minutes of January 17, 1995. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 5. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 31. 1995 MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to receive the Appeals Commission minutes of January 31, 1995. � �„� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FBBRIIARY 15. 1995 PAGE 8 IIPON A VOICE DOTE, ALL VOTINa AYE� CHAIltPERBON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 6. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 2, 1995 MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to receive the Human Resources Commission minutes of February 2, 1995. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTINC, AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THL MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to adjourn the meeting. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON NEFIMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE FEBRIIARY 15, 1995� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ADJOIIRNED AT 8:02 P.M. Respectfully submitted, '"� ` � � I�C�Z' 1 CQ t,� Lavonn Cooper Recording Secretary � FEB-13-95 MON 9:28 EF:ICKSON OIL FAX NO�, 17153�6zU�� r,UG/UC � �����a i"'� ca,oco tnc. P.O. Box 1267 Ponca City. OK 74803 December 2S, 1994 . 'Y ' To whom it m2�y concer�: •• • As the cur�ent awne�s af Conoco faciJities iocated at 1757 6 Highway 7, Minnetonk�, and 7600 N.�, Uriivefsity Drive; Frtdley, w� authorize Erickson Oi! to have access to site pian a�pprovals, includi�g v�riances a�d _cd�ditional use permits. a�d othe� permits as appropria#e. . . • . • . . '��% / / Li��,'�'`'�/ ! G�' G�� a.n --��. Michael Bfackburn . Branded Marketir�g Man2��er ,.,� Panca City, Ok. • • r . . . . . . ...,.;... � � �.. . �.:�.� . . . .. _ ..... . .... . .�:�.. � :�..��.; • ) S I G N- IN S H E E T � PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING� Wednesda}�, February 15, 1995 Name Address/Business � t � r� �z�� .��.s�-e,u:v 7� ���iv�e�'� VC .�r � c �s�7 �� ( ��e,e� - � w � �� � �'�1