Loading...
PL 09/06/1995 - 30812�'�1 ..�--^ ���� �� � ��_��'� PLANNING COMMIBBION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 6, 1995 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Newman called the September 6, 1995, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Members Absent: Dave Newman, Dave Rondrick, LeRoy Oquist, Brad Sielaff Diane Savage, Dean Saba, Connie Modig Others Present: Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Roger Geis, 515 Cloverleaf Pkway, Blaine, NIlJ Michael Geis, 520 Dover Street, Fridley, NIlJ APPROVAL OF AUGUST 16. 1995, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to approve the August 16, 1995, Planning Commission minutes as written. IIPON A VOICL VOTE� ALL VOTINa AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT REOUEST. L.S. #95-01. BY CLAUDIA AND MICHAEL GEIS OF 520 DOVER STREET N.E • To take property owned by Roger C. Geis and split it into five separate parcels (Parcels A- E) as follows: Parcel A: Lot 27, Block L, Riverview Heights (This parcel will be combined with Irvin and Harriet Lindstrom's property, 540 Dover Street N.E.) PBrCel B: LotS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 28, B10Ck L, Riverview Heights Parcel C: Lot 29, Block L, Riverview Heights Parcel D: Lots 32 and 33, Block L, Riverview Heights (This parcel will be combined with Lavern and Dianne Haldorson's property , 514 Dover Street N.E.) Parcel E: Lots l, 2, 3, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32, Block M, Riverview Heights MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING. BEPTEMBER 6, 1995 PAa$ 2 �\ IIPON A VOICB VOTB, ALL VOTINa AYE, CBAIRPERSON DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIHLIC HEARIN(� OPEN AT 7:33 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated the request is to subdivide the property of Claudia and Michael Geis at 520 Dover Street N.E. The property is located west of East River Road. The plan looks different on paper than in the field. While this is a beautiful site, the streets do not match up. The site has interesting topography and site conditions. Mr. Hickok stated the request is to allow a subdivision of the land to sell a 25 foot x 126 foot lot to the Lindstroms, a property owner to the northwest of the subject parcel, and to sell a 50 foot x 109.26 foot lot to the Haldorsons, owner of the property to the northeast. Mr. Hickok stated, as part of the subdivision process, this must be approved by the Planning Commission and City Council before the County will allow a subdivision such as this to be recorded. Staff has reviewed the request and recommends approval with the following stipulations: l. The petitioner shall stipulate in the conditions of sale ^, that the adjacent neighbors, the Haldorsons and the Lindstroms, combine the split parcels with their parcels to create single tax records. . Mr. Hickok stated the City is concerned about substandard residential lots. Staff would not be interested in supporting the subdivision if it would be creating a substandard lot. The idea is to create a larger lot by combining the tax parcels. 2. A private easement allowing maintenance, repair or replacement of the utility services shall be executed and recorded against Lot 33, Block L, Riverview Heights. Mr. Hickok stated the parcel being sold to the Haldorsons would require a utility easement because the utilities for the Geis home comes across Lot 33. He understands the Haldorsons are in agreement with this stipulation. Mr. Kondrick asked the petitioner if he understood the stipulations and if the petitioner agreed with the stipulations. Mr. Geis stated he agreed and understood the stipulations. He has talked to the neighbors and had them sign a document about combining the lots. � Mr. Kondrick asked if the petitioner had those documents. ' Mr. Hickok stated the petitioner did submit documents stating the �„� PLANNINa COMMI88ION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 6. 1995 PAGE 3 i \ neighbors are interested in the subdivision and would comply with the conditions. Mr. Oquist asked what would happen to the Lot Split if the property is not sold. Mr. Hickok stated it is staff's intent by putting the stipulation on the condition of sale that it be combined with the lots to the north. We needed the full cooperation of the neighbors before the City would agree to the split. If the neighbors do not buy, staff would not agree. Mr. Geis stated he and the neighbors are all in agreement. MOTIOAI by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTINa AYE� CHAIRPERSON NEWM�►iN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLiC HEARINa CLOSED AT 7a38 P.M. MOTION by Mr. Rondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to recommend approval of Lot Split Request, L.S. #95-01, by Claudia and Michael Geis, 520 Dover Street, N.E., to take property owned by /'1 Roger C. Geis and split it into five separate parcels (Parcels A - E) as follows: Parcel A: Lot 27, Block L, Riverview Heights (This parcel will be combined with Irvin and Harriet Lindstrom�s property, 540 Dover Street N.E.) P8tCe1 B: LOtS 1� 2� 3� 4� 5� 6� 7� 8� 9� and 28, B1oCk L� Riverview Heights Parcel C: Lot 29, Block L, Riverview Heights Parcel D: Lots 32 and 33, Block L, Riverview Heights (This parcel will be combined with Lavern and Dianne Haldorson's property , 514 Dover Street N.E.) P8tae1 E: LotS 1, 2, 3, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32, Block M, Riverview Heights; with the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall stipulate in the conditions of sale that the adjacent neighbors, the Haldorsons and the Lindstroms, combine the split parcels with their parcels to create single tax records. � _� � �"� PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETINd. BEPTEMHER 6. 1995 PAGE 4 2. A private easement allowing maintenance, repair or replacement of the utility services shall be executed and recorded against Lot 33, Block L, Riverview Heights. IIPON A VOICE VOTL� ALL VOTINa AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIIBLY. Mr. Hickok stated the City Council would consider this request on October 2, 1995. 2. WATER CONSERVATION AND EMERGENCY PLAN Mr. Hickok stated the Commission has,before them the revised draft of the Water Conservation and Emergency Plan. The action requested is to consider setting a public hearing for October 4. The law requires that, as of January 1, 1996, we are to have a water conservation emergency plan in place. In an effort to meet that deadline, we started early this year to accomplish this. A consultant did a draft which was completed in March. This draft was presented to the Planning Commission and Environmental Quality and Energy (EQE) Commission members in April. In the staff summary, he has attempted to outline the comments and responses to those comments. In many cases, the document refers to the emergency conditions ordinance. This is an ordinance staff would like to have before the Commission as a draft before the public hearing. Mr. Hickok stated staff is asking the Commission to establish a public hearing for October 4. Staff will also ask the EQE to have this on their agenda for September 26. The City Council would give preliminary approval to submit the plan to the Metropolitan Council on October 23. Mr. Hickok stated he was asked to provide to members only the changes. He has submitted the entire plan because there were format changes. Between now and the public hearing, staff will meet with the internal committee to determine the implementation dates. He is confident that staff will have this completed for the October 4 agenda. There is also a map that is in the plan that the GIS staff will work to refine. There are also internal staff comments which will be included as well. These additions will be underlined in the new text. Mr. Sielaff asked if inembers would be sent another draft or will members comment based on what they have received thus far. Mr. Hickok stated members would comment on the draft received and staff will bring underlined changes for the public hearing. This � is the most recent draft based on the comments. .� i /� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. SEPTEMBER 6, 1995 PAGE 5 MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to establish a public hearing for October 4, 1995, at 7:30 p.m. to review the Water Conservation and Emergency Plan. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CBAIRPER80N NEWMAN DECLARED TSE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIIBLY. 3. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING OF AUGUST 10, 1.995 MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to receive the minutes of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority meeting of August 10, 1995. QPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYB, CHAIRPERBON NEWMAN DECLAR�D THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOQBLY. 4. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 15, 1995 MOTION by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to receive the minutes of the Appeals Commission meeting of August 15, 1995. �"�, IIPON A VOICE VOTT, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED T8E MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIIBLY. �"',, � ADJOURNMENT OTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to adjourn the meeting. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE SEPTEMBER 5, 1995, PLANNIN�3 COMMI88ION MEETINC� ADJOIIRNED AT 7s47 P.M. Respectfully submitted, ,� ,��� ��7 C �� avonn Cooper �� Recording Secretary � i''y1 r� � S I G N— IN S H E E T PLANNING COMMIgSION MEETING, Wednesday, September 6, 1995