Loading...
06/05/1996 - 00003563CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 5, 1996 CALL TO ORDER: chairperson savage called the �une 5, 1996, Planning commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Mr. Hickok stated that since the last Planning commission meeting, the city council has appointed Ms. savage as chairperson of the Planning commission. Ms. savage has stepped down as chairperson of the Appeals commission and tonight will take her place as chairperson of the Planning commission. Mr. Hickok thanked Mr. Kondrick for being the vice-chairperson during the interim. ROLL CALL: Members Present: �iane savage, �ave Kondrick, �eROy oquist, connie Modig Members Absent: �ean saba, Brad sielaff, others Present: scott Hickok, Planning coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant �ouglas Peterson, Atty., rndependent school District #14 �erald Maeckelberh, North suburban Hospital �istrict Board Rosemary �off, North suburban Hospital �istrict Board Betty wall, North suburban Hospital �istrict Board �ackie �edlicki, Fridley convalescent Home �ary Alberts, Fridley convalescent Home Alan Plorowski, Architectural �esign Partners PA Rev. �erald Peterson, 776 - 63 Avenue N.E. �ulia Peterson, 776 - 63 Avenue N.E. �oan Egler, 6300 �ackson street N.E. colleen vianish, 7573 �yric �ane N.E. �anice carroll, 7567 �yric �ane N.E. Norlan �ee, 644 - 63 Avenue N.E. Rita weglinski, 6281 �ackson street N.E. �oe Rystrom, 6291 �ackson street N.E. Ron christiansen, 5884 �efferson street N.E. APPROVAL OF MAY 15, 1996, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. oquist, to approve the May 15, 1996, Planning commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, #96-11, BY ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN PARTNERS: Per section 205.07.O1.c.(8) of the Fridley city code, to allow an expansion of a convalescent home in an R-1, single Family �welling, zoning district, on �ot 1, Block 1, Maple Manor Addition, generally located at 7590 �yric �ane N.E. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:32 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the special use permit request is by Architectural Design Partners representing the Fridley convalescent Home which is located at 7590 �yric �ane. The property is generally located at the intersection of Madison street and �yric �ane. To the north is the Fridley Medical center, to the west is unity Hospital, and to the south is a single family residential dwelling district. The request is being made to allow the expansion of the existing convalescent home. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 5, 1996 PAGE 2 Ms. McPherson stated the convalescent home was constructed in 1965 after issuance of a special use permit. The existing convalescent home is two stories high, 18,412 square feet in area, with a total of 36,824 square feet and contains 129 beds. The proposal is to allow a two-story addition that total 3,704 square feet on each floor. The measurements are approximately 38 feet x 100 feet. This addition would replace an existing modular unit which was added in 1991. The purpose of the addition is to provide additional office space, therapy space, and space for other ancillary uses which provide services to the residents. other spaces within the existing convalescent home would be remodelled to provide improved dining facilities and additional family visiting space. Ms. McPherson stated the addition meets the setback requirements of the R-1 zoning district and the addition will not cause an increase in lot coverage. The one section of the code that is at issue is the number of parking stalls. rn the medical office district of the zoning code, a ratio of 1 parking space for every 150 square feet of building area (1:150) is required for health services. The term "health services" is not clearly defined in the code. rf this ratio is applied to this use, it results in 294 spaces being required. The site provides 80 spaces. The petitioner has provided a series of parking lot surveys of the existing use which supports the fact that the 80 spaces are adequate for the existing use on site. The petitioner also provided some additional information from adjacent communities regarding the number of parking stalls required for this type of use. Based on those type of ratios, the use would be in conformance with those more specific parking ratios which address convalescent homes. Anywhere from 47 to 109 spaces would be required using the parking requirements in other communities for convalescent homes. Ms. McPherson stated that in reviewing the code, it appears the 1:150 ratio was required to address high turnover medical uses and not nursing homes where a majority of the residents do not drive. There is room on the site to provide approximately 23 additional spaces. �oing so would remove existing green space and would require the removal of an existing berm which provides screening for the residential complex to the east. Based on the current use of the site, the parking supply is adequate and, historically, the city has not experienced that the site is under parked. Ms. McPherson stated that with the exception of the number of parking stalls, the proposed proJ ect meets the code requirements. staff recommends approval of the request with the following stipulation: 1. Reuse of the facility for other than a convalescent home will require review and approval by the Planning commission and the city council. Ms. Modig asked if the screening would be affected by additional parking. Ms. McPherson stated this will remain. rf additional spaces were to be provided in that area, this would be removed. Mr. Kondrick asked if staff was comfortable with them expanding. Ms. McPherson stated staff is comfortable with the project as proposed. Mr. Kondrick asked that if the parking lot area were to be expanded, would this require additional trees and shrubs? Ms. McPherson stated staff would have to evaluate that. Ms. Modig asked if staff had received any feedback from the neighborhood. Ms. McPherson stated she received one phone call from the caretaker of the adjacent residential complex. After the proposal was explained and clarified for the caller, there were no other issues. Ms. �edlicki stated they were not going to be adding to the residential population and not adding staff. This is simply to provide additional space for current services. rt will be office areas, classroom, therapy areas, a residents activity room, and a beauty and barber shop. rt will then free up space in the existing building for the dining area and family visiting area. Mr. Kondrick asked if they had experienced any parking problems in recent years. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 5, 1996 PAGE 3 Ms. �edlicki stated they do perhaps twice a year when they have large family volunteer events. They then use parking at the Fridley Medical center. Mr. Kondrick asked if the addition would be architecturally compatible with the rest of the building. Mr. Plutowski stated, yes. The goal is to replace the wood structure. The expansion will match the existing materials so the building will look like it was built as one. Ms. savage asked if there was any problem with the stipulation. Ms. �edlicki stated, no. she understand the home is with a special use permit now. Ms. savage asked if they expected an increase in the number of residents. Ms. �edlicki stated no. The state of Minnesota has had a moratorium for a number years so nursing homes cannot add residential beds unless they are in a private pay facility. They will not be adding beds. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. oquist, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:42 P.M. Mr. oquist stated the request seems straight forward. MOTION by Mr. oquist, seconded by Ms. Modig, to recommend approval of special use Permit, sP #96-11, by Architectural �esign Partners, to allow an expansion of a convalescent home in an R-1, single Family �welling zoning district, on �ot 1, Block 1, Maple Manor Addition, generally located at 7590 �yric �ane N.E., with the following stipulation: 1. Reuse of the facility for other than a convalescent home will require review and approval by the Planning commission and the city council. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. McPherson stated this request would be considered by the city council on �une 24. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PLAT REQUEST, P.s. #96-01, BY INDEPENDENT SC To replat Blocks 1- 13, inclusive, vineland Addition and �ot 12, Block 2, shorewood Addition, into: �ots 1- 12, Block 1, Tigerland Park and �ot 1, Block 2, Tigerland Park. This property is generally located north of 61st Avenue, east of 7th street, south of 63rd Avenue, and west of �ackson street. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:43 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the plat request is by rndependent school �istrict 14 (rs� 14). The purpose of the plat is to replat all of vineland Addition, platted in 1886, as well as �ot 12 of shorewood Addition. The subject parcel is bounded by 61st Avenue on the south, 7th street on the west, �ackson street on the east, and by what was originally platted as 63rd Avenue on the north. This also encompasses the area where the parking lot and driveway access into the Fridley Middle school is located. Ms. McPherson stated the purpose of the plat request is to resolve a number of title issues between the city of Fridley and rs� 14. As opposed to doing a lot split in order to split the property, the property needs to be replatted because the type of property underlying the middle school is torrens property which makes splitting the property into two pieces more difficult. Ms. McPherson stated the school district acquired the subJ'ect parcel through condemnation, tax forfeiture, and direct dedication from a resident. The property was acquired by the school district through the 1930's, 40's and 50's. The school district became full owner in PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 5, 1996 PAGE 4 1955 and now owns the entire block of property. since 1957, the city and school district have had a number of operating ag reements which outline both joint use and exchange of property between the City of Fridley and ISD 14. Ms. McPherson stated there are a number of city properties which are located on the west half of the subject parcel. There are ball fields, a football field, a number of well houses, tennis courts, a recently constructed picnic shelter, as well as the above ground water tank and filter plant. Ms. McPherson stated it is the intention that, once the property is replatted, everything west of a somewhat centered line would be transferred to the city of Fridley for ownership. why are we doing this? rn 1994, Anoka county passed a solid waste fee which is applied to commercial, industrial and institutional parcels in the county to fund solid waste abatement and recycling programs. At that time, the city began an analysis of all the city-owned parcels to ensure that the City was paying the proper fees for the property they owned. It became apparent that there was a property and title issue with this particular property. The city and school district have been working cooperatively for the last year to bring this to fruition. Ms. McPherson presented the plat of Tigerland Park, the proposed name of the plat. she stated it contains 13 lots, and the lots have been created via the uses indicated on the drawing. The creation of these lots was recommended by the county to facilitate any future lease agreements. rn general, the west portion of the property will be transferred to the City. The City will also acquire a small lot in the northeast corner of the property which contains one of the city's well houses and also a small portion along the west shore of Moore �ake which is a portion of the sand �unes Park area. Ms. McPherson stated the subdivision ordinance does not set forth specific areas or lot widths or uses on publicly zoned land. Nor does the subdivision ordinance set forth lot areas or lot width requirements for school uses on residentially zoned lots. However, the parcels do exceed the minimum 9,000 square foot requirement as set forth in the R-1 zoning district. Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends approval of the plat request to the city council in order to facilitate the property transfer between the school district and the city. Ms. Modig asked how this would impact the residents. Ms. McPherson stated there would be no impact. This is a housekeeping issue. There is no proposed construction. The city and/or the school district do not intend to sell any of the land. rn reality, nothing that is in the field will change. Mr. Peterson stated he was the attorney for the school district. over the last 1 1/2 years, the school district staff has worked closely with city staff and the city surveyor. He has met with the Anoka county Examiner of Titles to go through the process. He met with the Registrar of Titles and the county surveyor. The proposal is what has come out of those meetings. The school district had not initially intended to plat all of the area, but because of other title problems that do not affect any of the neighbors but rather the way the property is described, the county required if they were going to convey any of the property they had to replat the entire area. MOTION by Mr. oquist, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:55 P.M. Ms. Modig stated the request seems like a housekeeping item. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. oquist, to recommend approval of Plat Request, P.s. #96-01, by rndependent school �istrict No. 14, to replat Blocks 1- 13, inclusive, vineland Addition and �ot 12, Block 2, shorewood Addition, into: �ots 1- 12, Block 1, Tigerland Park and �ot 1, Block 2, Tigerland Park. This property is generally located north of 61st Avenue, east of 7th street, south of 63rd Avenue, and west of �ackson street. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 5, 1996 PAGE 5 Ms. McPherson stated the city council on �une 24 will establish a public hearing for �uly 8 to review this request. 3. VACATION REQUEST, SAV #96-02 (A), BY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 14: To vacate streets and alleys described as follows: All of washington street, platted as llth Avenue on vineland Addition to Fridley Park, Anoka county, Minnesota. All of �efferson street, platted as 12th Avenue on vineland Addition to Fridley Park, Anoka county, Minnesota. All of Madison street, platted as 13th Avenue on vineland Addition to Fridley Park, Anoka county, Minnesota. All of Monroe street, platted as 14th Avenue on vineland Addition to Fridley Park, Anoka county, Minnesota. All of Quincy street, platted as 15th Avenue on vineland Addition to Fridley Park, Anoka county, Minnesota. All of �ackson street, platted as 16th Avenue on vineland Addition to Fridley Park, Anoka county, Minnesota. All of 62nd Avenue Northeast, platted as Kent street on vineland Addition to Fridley Park, Anoka county, Minnesota. All the alleys in Blocks 1 to 12 inclusive, vineland Addition to Fridley Park, Anoka County, Minnesota. That part of 61st Avenue Northeast, platted as court street on vineland Addition to Fridley Park, Anoka county, Minnesota, lying easterly of the east line of Block 12, extended southerly, said vineland Addition to Fridley Park. 63rd Avenue Northeast, platted as Astor street on vineland Addition to Fridley Park, Anoka county, Minnesota. All of the unnamed Half Avenue or street, as platted on vineland Addition to Fridley Park, Anoka county, Minnesota, said unnamed Avenue or street, lying easterly of the east line of Block 12, extended southerly, said vineland Addition to Fridley Park. This property is generally located north of 61st Avenue, east of 7th street, south of 63rd Avenue, and west of �ackson street. 4. VACATION REQUEST, SAV #96-02(B), BY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 14: To vacate streets and alleys described as follows: All of washington street, as platted on Moore �ake Addition, Anoka county, Minnesota, lying northerly of the north line of 60th Avenue Northeast, as platted on Moore �ake Addition, and lying southerly of the south line of 61st Avenue Northeast, as platted on said Moore �ake Addition. All of �efferson street, as platted on Moore �ake Addition, Anoka county, Minnesota, lying northerly of the north line of 60th Avenue Northeast, as platted on Moore �ake Addition, and lying southerly of the south line of 61st Avenue Northeast, as platted on said Moore �ake Addition. All of Madison street, as platted on Moore �ake Addition, Anoka county, Minnesota, lying northerly of the north line of 60th Avenue Northeast, as platted on Moore �ake Addition, and lying southerly of the south line of 61st Avenue Northeast, as platted on said Moore �ake Addition. All of Monroe street, as platted on Moore �ake Addition, Anoka county, Minnesota, lying northerly of the north line of 60th Avenue Northeast, as platted on Moore �ake Addition, and lying southerly of the south line of 61st Avenue Northeast, as platted on said Moore �ake Addition. All the alleys in Blocks 2 to 6, inclusive, Moore �ake Addition, Anoka county, Minnesota. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 5, 1996 PAGE 6 This property is generally located north of 59th Avenue, east of 7th street, south of 61st Avenue, and west of west Moore �ake �rive. VACATION REQUEST, SAV #96-02(C), BY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 14: To vacate streets and alleys described as follows: All of washington street, as platted on Moore �ake Addition, Anoka county, Minnesota, lying northerly of the north line of 59th Avenue Northeast, as platted on Moore �ake Addition, and lying southerly of the south line of 60th Avenue Northeast, as platted on said Moore �ake Addition. All of �efferson street, as platted on Moore �ake Addition, Anoka county, Minnesota, lying northerly of the north line of 59th Avenue Northeast, as platted on Moore �ake Addition, and lying southerly of the south line of 60th Avenue Northeast, as platted on said Moore �ake Addition. All of Madison street, as platted on Moore �ake Addition, Anoka county, Minnesota, lying northerly of the north line of 59th Avenue Northeast, as platted on Moore �ake Addition, and lying southerly of the south line of 60th Avenue Northeast, as platted on said Moore �ake Addition. All of Monroe street, as platted on Moore �ake Addition, Anoka county, Minnesota, lying northerly of the north line of 59th Avenue Northeast, as platted on Moore �ake Addition, and lying southerly of the south line of 60th Avenue Northeast, as platted on said Moore �ake Addition. 59th Avenue, as platted on Moore �ake Addition, Anoka county, Minnesota, lying easterly of the west line, extended southerly of Block 10, said Moore �ake Addition, and lying westerly of the east line, extended southerly, of Block 11, said Moore �ake Addition. 59th Avenue, as platted on Moore �ake Addition, Anoka county, Minnesota, lying westerly of the shoreline of Moore �ake and lying easterly of the following described line: Beginning at the southwest corner of Block 12, said Moore �ake Addition; thence southeasterly to the northwest corner of �ot 1, Block 1, �onnay's �akeview Manor Addition, Anoka county, Minnesota, and said line there terminating. 60th Avenue Northeast, as platted on Moore �ake Addition, Anoka county, Minnesota, lying easterly of the west line, extended southerly, of Block 6, said Moore �ake Addition, and lying westerly of the shoreline of Moore �ake, said Moore �ake Addition. All the alleys in Blocks 7 to 11, inclusive, Moore �ake Addition, Anoka county, Minnesota. This property is generally located north of 59th Avenue, east of 7th street, south of 61st Avenue, and west of west Moore �ake �rive. Ms. McPherson stated the three vacation requests are related. The purpose of the requests is to vacate the streets and alleys. They have bee separated into three requests to keep the issue of the ownership and petition straight and to keep the location portion separate. Part A of the request is to vacate all streets and alleys located in the vineland Addition. The second request, Part B, is to vacate streets and alleys located in Blocks 1- 6 and 12 of Moore �ake Addition, which is the parcel south of 61st Avenue and north of 60th. This parcel is actually owned by the city of Fridley. Part c is to vacate the streets and alleys in Blocks 7- 11, Moore �ake Addition, which is a parcel bounded by 7th street on the west, what would have been 60th on the north, and north of 59th Avenue on the south and into the sand �unes Park area to the east. Ms. McPherson stated this is a housekeeping issue. The school district acquired the parcel in vineland Addition through condemnation, tax forfeiture, and direct dedication. The second part of the request, which is owned by the city of Fridley, was acquired in 1954 through condemnation to establish public parks. rn 1957, Parkview Elementary school (now the community center) was constructed. rt is anticipated that the city will declare this parcel excess and will transfer that to the school district. The third parcel is owned by the school district and was acquired in 1958 through condemnation. construction of the high school began in 1957. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 5, 1996 PAGE 7 Ms. McPherson stated the site is fully developed with a variety of school and city facilities. rt is not anticipated that any development requiring the use of those streets and alleys will take place in the vineland plat. The same is true of the south portion of the site. The school has a number of facilities constructed throughout the subject parcels. No need is seen to construct streets or alleys within those platted right-of-ways. rt appears that at one time the streets and alleys were vacated; however, the paperwork trail becomes a bit fuzzy. rn order to make sure this is done properly, staff is reprocessing the request. Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends approval of the vacation requests. Ms. Modig asked if this could impact the neighbors. Ms. McPherson stated that from looking at it on paper, she would say it may. she received a call from a resident who was concerned about the vacation of the right-of-way of 63rd Avenue which is to the rear of residential dwellings located north of the vineland plat. There is an access road used by the city to access the well houses. some of the properties have gates in the rear fence. Ms. Kondrick asked if this road would remain open. Ms. McPherson stated staff is proposing to vacate it and bring it into the city owned lot as part of the plat. Based on testimony that may be received regarding the request, they can amend the preliminary plat to address that issue. Mr. Kondrick asked how the city vehicles gain access to the pump houses. Ms. McPherson stated the city will own the land so the city will have access to the well houses through the city's own lot. rt just will not be a dedicated street. This will not physically change anything. Mr. oquist stated south of the high school is an alley. will that stay? Ms. McPherson stated this is proposed to be vacated. rt will then become a driveway. rt was never constructed to be a public street. Ms. Modig asked that if this is done and someone is using that road to the rear of the residential properties, other than a city employee or a city vehicle, would a resident then be considered to be trespassing? Ms. McPherson stated she was not sure that the public actually uses these roads. There is a parking lot that provides access to the parking facilities on commons. The public still can use that facility. rn terms of the school district, it appears there is a parking lot which does access the school's garage. rf there is a public purpose, she believed the city has an agreement with the school district for joint parking to provide access to those facilities. Mr. Peterson stated the roadway or the access to the wells at the north end of the property will be ultimately transferred to the city. The school district does not use that road for any reason. This is basically a city issue rather than a school district issue. The issue with regard to the vacation of the alley to the south, that really would take on the same characteristic as a parking lot or a driveway access. The city and school district have a recorded easement agreement for parking and use of the property to the southwest. The only other clarification is the property that is along the lake shore immediately east of west Moore �ake road. rt is owned by the city. The school district petitioned for the vacation of the streets there. There is really nothing there, but this is to accomplish cleaning this thing up. Mr. christiansen stated he had a question about the area from 7th street to �efferson street and up 59th Avenue and not including the walkway that goes over to the school. According to the map, it indicates vacation of that street also. Ms. McPherson stated this was an error on the map. That will not be vacated. Mr. christiansen stated there is a gate on the north end which is closed unless the city is accessing those wells. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 5, 1996 PAGE 8 Mr. �ee stated that regarding the service road to the north, some residents make use of that by having garbage hauled out of the back. will they be affected by the vacation? Ms. McPherson stated she was not aware of that. staff can research that with the garbage haulers. rf the city needs to provide an easement to continue this service, they can do so. Mr. oquist asked how the haulers get in. Mr. �ee stated they use the gate. Either the city opens the gate or it is open. woodlake uses the back and he has also seen other trucks using that road also. Ms. weglinski stated she lives across the street from the well house. will that stay on the school property? Mr. McPherson stated this will remain as it is but the city will receive ownership of the land. Everything else will stay the same. Ms. weglinski asked if the city would sell that property. Ms. McPherson stated that if the city ever decided to sell the property, a public hearing would be conducted and neighbors would be notified. MOTION by Mr. oquist, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to recommend approval of vacation Request, SAV #96-02, by Independent school District No. 14. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Modig asked staff to check further on the statement regarding the use of the access road to the north by the refuse haulers. 6. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY & ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 16, 1996 MOTION by Ms. Modig, seconded by Mr. oquist, to receive the minutes of the Environmental Quality & Energy commission meeting of April 16, 1996. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 8, 1996 MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. oquist, to receive the minutes of the Appeals commission meeting of May 8, 1996. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 8. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE HUMAN RESOURCE COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 2, 1996 MOTION by Mr. oquist, seconded by Ms. Modig, to receive the minutes of the Human Resource commission meeting of May 2, 1996. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 9. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 6, 1996 MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to receive the minutes of the Parks & Recreation commission meeting of May 6, 1996. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. OTHER BUSINESS: Mr. Hickok provided an update on requests that had previously come before the Planning commission. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 5, 1996 PAGE 9 ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. oquist, to adjourn the meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE JUNE 5, 1995, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:15 P.M. Respectfully submitted, �avonn Cooper Recording secretary