The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 09/17/1997 - 7058,� , y,�,� � — — � �, � �. �� -�` � � ; # � �� -� � � � $�� _ ��; � � �� ; � � i ~ A� L �� '^ ,, Y";v�' �# i � � a �d� � ,� A � m �� . F � . t ;. , „„�, ., , .- . . :. . �..�,. . . .:- : ,� � 7 \ '�� r . �3� � �y� �� , ,`v � t�� - � r "� fi� t�- .. y�,t+,R ; �.� �.�-nyn 4 � � � r s w: �. ,R .��1 a . , . s . .. _. � ., , . . > . . , _ . . ` �- : ' . . A . « � . , .. �. .. . . � . � t �'. �`�' �t. ;*f �;� � � � �� '0 � � � � s �� ',� �. � . , z . �ar .,� �?' . . . .. � . _ ,_ . 5'� �� ' 4. v � G ��r � .Y # -� � °{. - $� � � "� i � � �.., �� ..: - . F �. i" � ti . � �� r �� , � � � �� ; J Q� �� I , i ,�, � .: : � � � a� � 1„ , � � , �� , � I .. ,, �'= � CITY OF FRIDLEY AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MTG. WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 1997 7:30 P.M. LOCATION: Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: � � � APPROVE PLAIVNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES• September 3, 1.997 - - � ��--� - - - - -�- 1. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING MEETING FOR AREA #3 2. PUBLIC HEARIRIG� CON�IDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT: P.S. #97-04. BY THE PHILIP STEPHEN COMPANIES. INC.: To resubdivide the property into six buildable lots for single family homes, on Lofs 20 and 24, ,4uditor's Subdivision No. 22, generally located at 6217 Central Avenue �--� N.E. 3. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #97-07 BY PAUL LITWINCZUK: To grant approval to maintain an existing 18' x 20' garage,.on Lot�17, except the South 55 feet thereof; Auditor's Subdivision No: 22, generally located at 6299 Central Avenue N.E. 4. (Tab�zd 9/3/9Z) RECEIVE �HE MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY & ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 19 1997 5. RECEIVE THE NtINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 4. 1997 � OTHER BUSINESS: ADJOURN � N /'� 0 CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING CONIl�lISSIOAT MEETING, SEPTII�F'R 3, 1997 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Savage called the September 3, 1997, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Members Absent: Diane Savage, Dave Kondrick, Dean Saba, Brad Sielaff, Connie Modig LeRoy Oquist, Larry Kuechle Others Present: .Barbara Dacy, Community Developmerit Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Maynard Nielson, 7144 Riverview Terrace Delores Hartos, 6200 Starlite Boulevard . Barb Thorstad, 6211 Star�ite Boulevard. � �ylvia Zi:ndgren, 6181 Starlite Boulevard Craig Hartos, 6200 Starlite Boulevard Councilmember Bob Barnett ^ APPROVAL OF AUGUST 20 �. 1997, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve the August 20, 1997, Planning Commission minutes as written.. UPQN A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECI.AREn'T8E MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOIISLY. 1. PUBLTC, HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #97-06, BY DELORES.AND CRAIG HARTOS: �� Per Section 205.07.01.C.(1) of the Fridley.City Code, to . allow construction of a second garage on Lot 16, Block 4, � Sy-lvan Hills Plat 3, Generally locate.d at b200 Starlite Boulevard N.E. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to �zaive the reading of the publi� hearing notice and to apen the public hearing. UPON A VOICE.VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CEAIRPERSON SAVAGE DE�T.nR�rn THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBI+IC T�'ART�`TG OPEN AT 7:32 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated the property is located on Starlite Boulevard and is zoned R-1, Single Family, as are all the surrounding properties. To the west of the property is the railroad line. Located on�the property is a single family home. Behind the home. is a�2 foot x 22 foot detached garage. There is also a 10 foot x 28 foot accessory structure on the northwest corner of the 0 d PLANNING CO1�Il�IISSION MEETING SEP't'��'?� 3 1997 pp�� 2 /"� property that encroaches 5 feet into the utility easement. Mr. Hickok stated the request is to allow for the 22 foot x 22 foot garage to be moved back to where the 10 foot x 28 foot structure once stood and to locate the garage 5 feet from the property rear line and outside of the utility easement. Then a new garage measuring 24 feet x 38 feet would be constructed. The proposed new garage has a narrow front and is deeper than the typical garage. On the west eievation of the proposed garage wili be a single garage door to allow access between the two structures. Mr. Hickok stated, as discussed, the petitioner is proposing to kee.p the current 22 foot x 22 �oot existing garage but to move it back on the site. In order to do this, the 10 foot.x 28 foot � ' structure will be removed. The total square footage for the accessory buildings being considered is 1,396 square feet. The maximum allowed is 1,400 square feet. The purpose of keeping the 22 foot x 22 foot structure is to provide storage for firewood, lawn and snow equipment, and to provide shelter for the dogs when they are left alone. ' � Mr. Hickok stated staff recommends that the Planning CommisSion recommend approval of the special.use permit to the City Council ^ with the following stipulations: l. T�e structures shall be architecturally compatible.with the . existing dwelling. 2. Neither accessory structure be used for a home occupation. 3. The 10 foot x 28 foot structure shall be removed within three months of completion of the garages; a demoli.tion permit shall be obtained. _ 4. Proper moving and building permits shall be obtained prior to construction starting. 5. The second garage (22 foot x 22 foot) shall not be located in the utility easement. Mr. Kondrick asked if there were any special setbacks other than that the existing garage not be located in the utility easement. There is no other dispensation granted by the Appeals Commission to allow the buildings to sit where they are. The setbacks are met. Mr. Hickok stated this was correct. Mr. Kondrick asked if staff had received any comments from the � � � P?�ANNING CONb�lISSION- MEETING. -- SEP�EU�ER -3 --1997 - PAGE-3 - - - - neighbors. Mr. Hickok stated staff had received no comments. Mr. Sielaff asked how big the site was. Mr. Hickok stated the site is 11,250 square feet. Mr. Sielaff asked what was the percentage of lot coverage when taking into account the house and accessory structures. Mr. Hickok stated the total coverage will be 21.90. 25a is the maximum allowed coverage. � Ms. S�vage asked the petitioner had any problems with the stipulations. Ms. Hartos stated she did not, except the demolition permit for the shed. Mr. Hickok stated, how�ver the petitioners chooses, the shed would be a third building and must.be removed. In order to do that, if the building were going to be demoli�hed, they would need a ^� demolition permit. If the°�l�uilding is to be� moved; they would need a moving permit. Ms. Hartos stated they had planned to tear down that building before construction. Ms. Hartos stated the garage to be moved is a•hout l0 years.old and in good shape. The shed is more make-shif.t. This will look much nicer. It was her idea. She could not see a good g�rage going.to waste. She started the plan to tear down the shed, move the existing garage and build a riew garage., �he existing garage wiil make good use for storage space. Mr. Konclrick asked if the petitioners had any probiems with the buildings being architecturally compatible. � Mr. Hartos stated everything would be the same. The garages would be sided the same as the house, and they will be the same color. Ms. Savage asked if the petitioners had heard any complaints from the neighbors. Ms. Hartos stated the two neighbors are at the meeting. One neighbor stated.she had no complaints. She just wanted to be sure that the garage would not be used for a home busines�. That !'�'� concern w�s cleared during the staff report. A PLANNING CO�lISSION MEETING. SEp'�'�� 3 1997 PAGE 4 Ms. �iartos stated another neighbor had planned to attend to support the request. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND TgE pOgLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:40 P.M. Mr. Kondrick stated he drove by the site and saw what they are going to do. He has no problem with the request as long as the petitioners are comfortable with the stipulations. Ms. Modig stated she had no problems with the request. She thought the proposal would be an improveFnent for that property. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend approval of Special Use Permit, SP #97-06, by.Delores and Craig Hartos, to allow construction of a second garage on Lot 16, Block 4, Sylvan Hills Plat.3, generally located at 6200 Starlite Boulevard N.E., with the following stipulations: a � l. The structures shall be architecturally compatible with the �. existing dwelling. � 2. Neither accessory structure be used for. a home occupation. 3. The 10 foo.t x 28 foot�structure shall be removed wit�hin three � months.of completion of the g�rages; a demolition perm.it shall be obtained. 4. Proper moving and building permits shall be ob�ained prior.ta construction starting. _ 5. Th� second garage (22 foot x 22 foot) shall not be located in the utility easement. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CEAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr.. Hickok stated the City Council would c.onsider this request at their meeting of September 22. , _ 2.. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING, ZOA #97-03, BY � THE CITY OF FRIDLEY: To rezone property from R-3, General Multiple E'amily Dwelling, to R-1,'Single Family Dwelling, on Lots 2 and 21, not taken for street purposes, and all of Lots 4 through 10. and 14 through 20 o.f Block 20, Fridley Park, as recorded at r"�, � PLANNING CON.Q�lISSION MEETING _ SEPTEL�ER 3 199.7 pAGE 5 �\ the�Office.of the Anoka County Recorder, generally located at the northeast corner of 61st Avenue and East River Road. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING A7[E, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DE�''r�iFtED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OP�? AT 7:43 P.M. Ms. Dacy stated the site is located in the northeast corner by East River Road and 61st Way, and encompasses the entire block. The property is zoned R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling, and is surrounded by R-1, Single E'amily, to the north and west. To the�. south, the Commission acted--to rezone t-he CR-1, General_- -=• -- _� Office, to M-1, Light Industrial. A 30,000 square foot warehouse complex will be constructed on that property. Ms. Dacy stated this request is to rezone the 3.1 acre site from R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling, to R-i; Single Family. The . request is being proposed by the City of Fridley. When the deveiopment and the rezoning occurred on the property originally, there was a development agreement approved. Bec�use no . development occurred on the property, the di.�ection was clear that � the zoning was to revert back.to R-1. This action happened on this site in 1984. At that time, the current owner had proposed to develop 28 loft townhomes on the site. The developer. was unable to follow through with the developme�nt and to comp�y �ith the stipulations. ' Ms. Dacy stated, when staff analyze a rezoning, they look at a number of factors. In this case, because the rezaning is back to . the original zoning that was on the property in 1984, it would be consistent with the zoning historically. Under the current plat, 12 to 15 single family lots could be developed under the R-1 zoning. The R-1 distric�, as well as R-3, allows churche�, nursing'homes, convalescent homes, and other similar �ypes of uses by a special use permit. It is conceivable that the Planning Commission could see a special use permit request for this sit.e... Ms. Dacy stated staff wanted to point out that the R-3 zoning works for this site as well even though this. application is being proposed to be consistent with the 1984 action. Because the site is located just to the north of an industrial area and to the � south edge.of a single family area, it forms � good transitional type of piece. The size of 3.l acres is large enough to accommodate berms or other types of landscaping for additional screening if so desired by the neighborhood. It is located near a railroad which is just to the east. Sometimes that may not be as attractive for single family homes. //"`�. PLANNING CONIl�IISSION MEETING SEPTEr�ER 3 1997 PAGE 6 Ms. Dacy stated, despite the recommendation to rezone �back to R-1, it is just as likely tk�at the Planning Commission may see a rezoning request in the future to go back to R-3 because of the parcel's location and it would be an opportunity to create a different housing style. Ms. Dacy stated staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council to rezone the property to R-1, Single Family. Ms. Modig asked if staff was saying there is still the possibility that the Planning Commission may be asked to rezone this property again back to R-3 because of the type of property it is. Ms. Dacy stated yes, this is possible. Ms. Modig asked, if the Planning Commission chose not to rezone the property, what negative thing would happen. Ms. Dacy stated she did not know that there would be any negatives. A rezoning application gives the City the maximum aFnount of discretion. It also requires a 4/5 approval by the Council: It offers the Planning Commission and City Council more :control. If the property remains R-3, a development could occur on the si.te as a permitted use, and the.Planning Commission and City Council would not have the ability.to Iook at the praject in some type of detail. There was an option discussed with the City Council of amending the development agreeme�t and keeping the zoning the way it is., but it was determined it would be_more appropriate to rezone the property to R-l. Any new request that would come through would have to go through the same type of scrutiny as any other request. , Mr. Nielson stated he is to keep the zoning R-3. this time. He thought a better for this property. to purchase the property. the owner of the groperty. He-would like He is working with two contractor.s at higher density development would be He has not had much luck getti.ng anyone for single family use. Mr. Kondrick asked the petitioner why he would prefer.to have.the zoning remain R-3. Mr. Nielson stated he had a contractor recently intere.sted in building 12� townhomes and another contractor who called today also interested in building townhomes. He would like to develop the property. Mr. Kondr�.ck asked how much of a.hardship would it present if the property were rezoned to R-1. � � ,� PLANNING CONIl�lISSION MEETING, SEPTII�E�t 3, 1997 PAGE 7 Mr. Nielson stated he would probably be bac.k within one year to rezone back to R-3. . MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, tQ close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DE�•aR�'•T� THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC H�nRTNG CLOSED AT 7:50 P.M. Mr. Saba stated he is concerned about putting the owner through hoops by rezoning. In looking at the location, there is not a good chance that will be developed as R-l. It is more likely to be developed as R-3. The requ�st is to go from R-3 to R-1, with the probability it will go back to .R-3 again. He did not - ��• •��-� �- understand why they are changing the zoning: He does under�tand that they have more latitude in the development of that.area. However, the site is located next to the railroad and just north of property zoned M-1. To him, R-3 would make an ideal buffer. Mr. Kondrick agreed. He wondered if he was missing something. Since there is M-1 across the street and othe� hous'ing one block away, it seems this would be a good spot for transitional housing or multiple family housing. He did not' see why they should do �••� this. Ms. Dacy stated the•Planning Commission does not have to agree. If the Commission feels the current zoning is.what you be.lieve should remain on the property, then the motion can reflect that. The intent behind the application. is essentially.to start .all over. The 1984 application could not happen for a variety o€ � reasons. The analysis was that, if it is rezoned.to R-1, then any development woul-d.have to meet. today'�s standards, would h�ve to go through the.process including a public hearing� and involve the people in the neighborhood.. If you feel�R-3 is inore appropx'iate, the Commission has the option to recommend denial of the request. Mr. Kondrick stated putting single family.houses there is a possibility if the�property is zoned R-1, but nothing has happened since. He does not think they would put houses there. Ms. Savage stated her concern is tha� they should not be making decisions themselves without the oppo��.unity for a full hearing. W� would be making the decision that the,pro�e �ty should be R-3. It seems to her that. this is not fo� the `p�lanning Commission to decide because they do not have the full opportunity for interested parties to have a say, to have their due process which is the opportunity to be heartl. Why should we decide that this property should be R-3 without going through the procedure that would be set up? • � P7�ANNING CONIl�lISSIOld MEETING, SEPTEI��ER 3, 1997 Pp�� g Ms. Modig stated the property is currently zoned R-3. The process, if that was a problem, would not have taken place. Unless she is misunderstanding what s�aff is. saying,.by going back to R-1, it gives us some input as to the type of R-3 housing that goes in there. If the property remains R-3 and staff referred to today's standards, whatever development goes in there has to meet the current criteria. The advantage to the Planning Commission putting the zoning to R-1 is that no one could put in a development without first coming through the process. Ms. Dacy stated that is correct. Mr. Kondrick stated he understood they would have more control if the zoning ,was R-1 rather than R-3. . Ms. Dacy stated this was correct. Ms. Sielaff stated staff inentioned that a special use permit Gould be obtained. For what purposes would such a permit be required? Ms. Dacy stated the R-1 and R-3 zoning allows a similar list special uses such as churches or convalescent homes. Because size of the site, you couid see a.r.equest for a church under either zoning. The special use permit request would have to through the process. of the .. Ms. Dacy stated in 1984 the City rezoned the property subject.to the execution.of a developmerit agreemen�t based on 28 loft townhomes. The developer could not construct the loft townhornes.� The City proceeded to pass the zoning to R-3 with the development agreement stipulations: While there is an option that would . renegotiate the development �agreement to somethin;g different under today's standards, the City Counc�.l felt•it was appropriate to initiate the process to rezone the property back to.R-1: Any development would require the petitioner to file a.new petition, the City would ha.ve to notify the surrounding people within 350 feet and would involve the public in that new plan. That g.ives the City co�trol to evaluate the request to zone back to R-3. Ms. Savage stated this also gives all interested persons an opportunity to be heard. Ms. Modig asked, if the Commission were to rezone as R-1 and the owner comes back next year to request R-3 zoning, is there a way we can put on a time certain so this does not keep coming back year after year. It seems like a lot of paperwork and a lot of wasted time. She likes to think that the City could look at those things and have some input about what goes on the property and the type of use. If reverting this back to R-1 gives us greater input and control, that would be�an advantage. Otherwise, she though�t �, i"'� �� "`, �"� PI,ANNING CONIl��IISSION MEETING, SEPTEL�ER 3, 1997 _ PAGE 9 they were just changing numbers. � Mr. Sielaff stated part of the issue is also getting input from neighbors. � Mr. Kondrick asked if they should be thinking about rezoning any other R-3 properties to R-1 so we have control. Ms. Savage stated this property is unique because the contractor did not fulfill their obligations. Ms. Dacy stated the only other substantial piece of property zoned R-3 that was developed recently was the Harstad townhomes east of Highway.65. There are no other vacant parcels zoned R-3-at.�tY:.is time. There are spots zoned R=3 here and tliere but the majority are developed. ' Mr. Saba asked if this would be treating the matter of rezoni,ng rather lightly and r�ot sticking to a zoning plan. He has a problem with changing the zoning from R-1 to R-3, theri R-3 back to R-1 without a specific plan for development. We still hav� some control if the zoning is R-3. The intent is to develop the property as a townhome devel.opment as it was intended in 1984. He has.a personal issue with just changing the zoning for the sake of changing the zoning to have control. Ms. Savage stated she sees this as a unique situation where in 1984 a request was approved to al�ow loft townhomes to be built. There was a.plan and a project, but that did not happen.• Right now there may be in the future a similar plan but it is not before us now. She thought this was more procedural. This is reverting back to what it was before because the agreement was�not carried . thrpugh. She.personally would concur with staff's recommendation. If there was a plan in front of .us, that is different:but we do not have a plan and may not for another year. � Mr. Saba stated that is the issue he has. They do not have a pl�n for R-1. The loca�ion is next to the railroad tracks and across from M-1. He did not see that as a prime development for R-1. He thought the City would see a request in one year to go back to R- 3. ` Ms. Savage stated she thought the main concern is that this will give peopie the opportunity to be heard. There was.a hearing in 1984 where the neighbors had the.opportunity to be present and express their views. That is not happening now. S.he thought that needs to occur. That is a fundamental due process of the law that people can be heard, and she thought that was the intent of .the City Council. PLANNING CONIl�ZISSION MEETING SEPTEU�ER 3 1997 pAGE 10 /"'� Mr. Saba stated they were holding a public hearing�now and people had the opportunity to be heard, but few peopl.e are at this meeting. He thought that was due process. Ms. Modig stated she is going back and forth. She sees what the City wants to do and understands it, but she also thinks the property is not viable and has not been for all this time for single family. It was R-1 for years, and nothing happened. Nothing happened on it with�R-3 either. She thought they would be spending more time down the road going through the same process and argument. If the Commission chose to leave the zoning as it is, because the developer has to come in for building permits, submit a site plan, and meet certain criteria, she really does not understand how much more input they waul.d have by changinG the- zoning than not other than a public hearing. She thought`that was valuable, but there zaas a public hearing tonight. The mailing list would be the same. There was no interest now. Mr. Nielson stated he also owned the 1/2 block that is vacant to the•north of this block which.is zoned R-1. The rezoning would only affect 4 houses. There is only one house that faces his property and that is across East River Road. It is not really affecting anyone. Mr. Sielaff stated, as he read the public hearing notice, he did � not get all of the issues that were discussed tonight.. If he were part of the public, he would not get upset about it because he • would not know what the issues were. Ms. Modig stated the rezoning wo.uld still be the same. If there is. no interest in the rezoning, why rezone the property. The mailing list was quite extensive and included a number of commercial pr.operties. Mr. Kondrick stated he thought any.re5ident driving by there would conclude multiple family would be better there than single family. The railroad tracks are there.� Industrial land is to the south. When the zoning changed from R-1 to R-3, the neighbors had the � opportunity to have their say. He likes the idea of having control but after hearing discussion he would prefer to have the zoning remain the same. The City sent out notices that the rezoning is an issue but there were no responses. Personally, he also feels the property would best serve the citizens for a multiple family use. Ms. Savage stated she did not disagree with that. They do not know what will be going up there. They do.not know the type of � multiple family dwelling that would go up there. If the zoning is � R-3, there is not the same control as to what type of multiple dwelling can be erected there. There was a concern voiced in the /'� /"`'� PLANNING COI��lISSION MEETING, SEPTEI�ER 3, 1997 _ PAGE 11 surveys about multiple family dwellings. Part of it is the fear of c.rime. If the people knew there was going to be some type of de�elopment going up, they would come. If they find out there is a development that they might not w�ant in their neighborhood, they would come. She understands the concerns being expressed that the property is not a suitable property for single family dwelling area. She still feels though that it is important to wait until there is an actual project that is going to be there and to have an opportunity for everyone to have their say. She did not think they should be concerned with the extra time and paperwork when it comes to letting people decide what type of property they want in the City. Mr. Sielaff asked what happens at this point to the pr�vious development agreement. Ms. Dacy stated a resolution passed by the City Council declared the development agreement breach. Because the developer could not fulfill their�obligation, the agreement becomes null and void. The resolution instructs the City to initiate the.rezoning process back to R-l. � Mr. Sielaff stated an alternative would be not to rezone th� � property. Would the•City then,need another develapment agreement? Ms. Da.cy stated, because the City Council has taken action to consider the agreement breach, they can.no longer use the original agreement as a negotiating tool. It would be left fio building codes and zoning codes. If ther.e was a proposal for owner occupied townhomes, there is the possibili.ty of a plat application which would go through the process. A developer may reque�t a• variance which would.go through the�Appeals Cominission. There is � a possibility ther� may be a public involvement process. But the developer could also submit a plan that meets all the - requirements., and they would have to then use the existing standards. Mr. Kondrick,asked, if.the Commiss�ion lef� the �oning a�s R-3, would they lose control of the density on.this property. Ms. Dacy stated whatever the R-3 zoning stipulates would have to be adhered to. If they met the letter of the law for R-3, then they would have to issue the building permit. Mr. Kondrick stated, if the zoning were R-1, we would have more control over the density. Ms. Dacy stated, in that case, they would have to file a rezoning application and then you get into tlie discu,ssion of whether this �"`1 is a good site for R-3. You still have the density requirements PLANNING CONIl�IISSION MEETING SEPTII��ER 3 1997 PAGE 12 to act as a guide. Through the rezoning process and site plan review process, you.may be able to control that a little more. Mr. Kondrick asked if they could control the quality, design, etc. He is willing to do that if they could exercise some power. He is not hearing that staff is saying that. Ms. Dacy stated this is not the same as the southwest quadrant. In the past, the City Council has based the stipulations as part of the rezoning request to control some issues such as architectural exteriors, etc. Each case has different circumstances. She cannot say they would have total control by rezoning back from R-1 to R-3. Mr. Saba stated this is difficult. He would like to restrict R-3, but in this location he personally cannot see rezoning the property to R-1 and then back to R-3. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend denial the Rezoning Request, ZOA #97-03, by the City of Fridley, to rezone property from R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling, to R- l, Single Family Dw.elling, on Lots 2 and 2i, not taken for street purposes, and all of Lots 4 through 10 and 14 through 20�of Block 20, Fridley Park, as recorded at the�Office of the Anoka County Recorder, generally located at the northeast corn�r of 61st Avenue and East River Road. UPON A VOICE VOTE, WITH MS . MODIG, NIlZ. SAB�', AND 1�9.t, ICpNDgICR VOTING AYE, AND MS. SAVAGE.AND 1�Ilt, gIELAFF VpTING NAY, CHAIRFERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED BY MAJORITY VOTE. Ms. Dacy stated the City Council would consider this request at their meeting of September 22. ; � 3. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A ZONING TEXT AN7ENDMENT, Z'I�A #97-01, BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY: To recodify the Fridley City Code, .Chapter 205, entitled "Zoning", in order to regulate the location of pawn shopst pawn brokers, and second hand goods dealers: To amend Sections 205.13.02, 205.14.O1.A, 205.15.O1.A, and 205.16.02. 205.13 C-1 LOCAL BUSINESS DISTRICT REGULATIOATS 2. USES EXCLUDED ' Any use allowed or excluded in any other district unless specifically allowed under Uses Permitted of this district are excluded in C-1 Districts, includinq, but not limited to: � � /-'� n 0 ,� PLANNING CONIl�l�SSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 3, 1997 PAGE 13 pawn shops, pawn brokers as xegulated by Chapter 31 of the Fridley City Code� and second hand,goods dea.�ers as defined in Minnesota State Statute 471.925. 205.14 C-2 GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT REGULATIONS l. USES PERMITTED A. Principal Uses. The following are principal uses in C-2 Districts: Chapter 31 of the Fridley City Code, and..�ecand hand goods dealers as defined in Minnesota State Statute•471.925. ° 205.15 C-3 �=r'�-Nl''•RAT. SHOPPING CENTER DISTRICT REGULATIONS 1. USES PERMITTED A. Principal Uses. ,� . The following are principal uses in C-3 Districts: Chapter 31 of the Fridley City Code, and second hand dealers as defined in Minnesota State Statute 471.925. 205.15 CR-1 GENEItAL OFFICE DISTRICT REGULATIONS � 2. USES EXCI,UDED - Any use allowed or excluded in any other district unless . sp�cifically allowed undez Uses Permitted of this district are excluded in CR-1 Districts, including, but riot limited to• pawn shops, pawn brokers as regulated by Chapter 31 of the Fridley City Code, and second hand dealers as defined in Minnesota State Statute 471.925. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public hear.ing. � UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECI.ARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:20 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated the request is.for a zoning text amendment that would affect Sections 205.13.04, 205.14.01.A, 205.15.O1.A, and � 205.16.02 of the .Fridley City Code. The purpose of the amendment PLANNING COI�IISSION MEETING, SEPTEN�ER 3, 1997 PAGE 1� is to prohibit second hand dea•ler shops and pawn shops in the C-1, Local Business, and CR-1, General Office, zoning districts and � also to modify the C-2, General Business, and C-3, General Shopping Center District, to allow second hand and pawn shops. Mr. Hickok stated the C-1 and CR-1 districts have historically served as a compatible transition between commercial and residential uses. The C-1 district provides local conveniences to surrounding neighborhoods. Mr. Hickok stated in early 1997 the City had a request to allow a second hand shop in a C-1, Local Business, district. The code was non-descript about the use and for a short time the business occupied a building in the C-1 district. During that t�me, concerns were voiced regarding the intensity of the use; the potential sale of used handguns, etc.� Based on a request, staff analyzed the situation and determined the code should more explicit about such uses in the C-1 and CR-1 districts, and in the C-2 and C-3.districts it•should be more descriptive in allowing these. Mr. Hickok stated the City is.required to make provisions for uses in its community. It is not easy to simply say no, but we �can be c�ear about where we direct uses. The proposed text amendment will clarify where pawn shops and second hand stores should be located in the City. Second hand shops are a bit different from pawn shops. Pawn shops are regulated in Chapter•31.of the City code which requires a license and a review process before commencement of ope�ation in a certain location. �Second hand uses are also in the City. Staff held a meeting with the owners of second hand businesses to discuss the modifications.. They were. in concurrence with the C-1 and CR-1 prohibition. Their best locations are in the C-2 and C-� districts. Mr. Hickok stated staff recommends the C-1 and CR-1 districts b� modifi�d to prohibit second hand shops and pawn shops, and that C- 2 and C-3 districts be modified to allow second hand shops and pawn shops as permitted uses. Ms. Savage stated there were not to be any second hand shops in the C-1 or CR-1 districts. She asked if there were any requests to have any. Mr. Hickok stated, with the exception of one discussed; there are no pending requests. The one mentioned in the presentation has moved to another location. Mr. Kondrick stated he wished to. clarify that the owners of these. types of businesses concur that the location.s would be best located with the language that is being submitted. � � � PLANNING CO1�Il+�lISSION MEETING, SEP't'F•MRFR 3, 1997 PAGE 15 ,'""'� Mr. Hickok stated this was correct. Mr. Kondrick asked if the police department prefers the proposed language as well. Mr. Hickok stated yes. The police department first asked staff to look at the C-1 district. Staff feels the CR-1 district should also be included. Councilmember Barnett asked if this would also apply to the second hand clothing and consignment stores in Holly Center. Mr. Hickok stated this would apply to all second hand operations. He is not familiar with any existing second hand use in a C-1 or CR-1 district. Second hand shops would be permitted b� right in the C-2 and C-2 districts. Holly Center is a C-3 district. MOTION. by Mr. Kor�drick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to close the public hearing. . IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECI�ARED THE MOTION CARRIID AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:30 P.M. � Mr. Kondrick stated he had no problem with the request. He thought it was nicely done. , MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend . approval of the Zoriing Text Amendment, ZTl��#�7-01, by the City of Frid�ey, to recodify the Fridley Ci'ty Code, Chapter 205; entitled "Zoning", in order to regulate the location of pawn shops, pawn brokers, and second hand goods dealers: To amend Sections 205.13.02, 205.14.O1.A, 205.15.01.A, and 205.16.02. 205.13 C-1 I�OCAL BUSINESS DISTRICT REGULATIONS 2. USES EXCLUDED Any use allowed or excluded in any other district unless specifically allowed under Uses Permi�ted of this district are excluded in C-1 Districts, including, but not limited to: pawn shops, pawn brokers as reg�ilated by Chapter 31 of the Fridley City Co�.e, and second hand goods dealers as defined in Minnesota State Statute 471.925. 205.14 C-2 GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT REGULATIOATS � 1. USES PERMITTED ' � PI,ANNING CONIl�lISSION MEETING SEPTED�ER 3, 1997 PAGE 16 � A. Principal Uses. The following are principal uses in C-2 Districts: (18) Pawn shops, pawn brokers as re ulated by Cha ter 31 of the Fridley Cit_y Code, and second hand oods dealers as defined in Minnesota State Statute 471.925. 205.15 C-3 GENERAL SHOPPING CENTER DISTRICT REGULATIONS l. USES PERMITTED A..Principal Uses. The following a.re principal uses iri C=3 Districts: (3) Pawn shops, pawn brokers as re ulated by Chapter 31 of the Fridley City Code, and second hand dealers.as defined in Minnesota State Statute 471.925. �205.15 - .�R-1 GENERAL OFFICE DISTRICT REGULATIONS 2. USES EXCLUDED �. Any use allowed or excluded in any other district unless specifically allowed under Uses Permitted of this district ar.e excluded in CR-1 Districts, iricluding, but not limited to: pawn shops, pawn brokers as re ulated by Chapter 31 of the Fridley Ci Code, and second nand dealers as defined in Minnesota State Statute 471.925. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CAAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. - Mr. Saba asked if there are any other businesses that should be included in this type of activity.. Mr.. Hickok stated the City did have a request to expand the CR-1 for a jewelry store which was more of the insurance side of the jewelry:business with some sales. Staff is monitoring that carefully. As they looked at this type of thing, they looked at the uses in the CR-1 and believe they are appropriate. With this exception, the code was not descriptive enough about these. That is why staff brought this forward. 4. FRIDLEY EXECUTIVE CENTER UPDATE Ms. Dacy stated in December, 1995, the HRA executed a contract for exclusive negotiations with MEPC-American Properties which �^, � PLANNING COl�lI S S ION MEETING SEPTF•N�ER 3 19 97 - PAGE 17 required MEPC to market the property on behalf o� the HRA. During the same timeframe, the City agreed to complete the intersection analysis and design amd some�of the environmental approvals that were required to serve the site. The current status is that MEPC has completed the master plan�process. The current plan was approved for up to a maximum of 580,000 square feet of office plus a little less than 100,000 square feet of service/commercial uses. Ms. Dacy stated, in the last 18 months, the City has completed the Highway 65 intersection design. The final plans and specifications are now under�aay. Constr,uction is proposed to start next spring. The City completed the environmental assessment worksheet and obtained an indirect source permit froia the MPCA. • . "; Ms. Dacy stated MEPC also completed a number of marketing a�tivities. They completed the focus group analysis. They changed the name of the site from Lake Pointe to the Fridley Executive Center because there were some conflicting development names in the metro area. They have a new logo that is out on the signs. They conducted a site event for brokers.during the summer of 1996. They have been conducting a number of ineetings with major prospects. In tYie agenda packet, correspondence from MEPC � lists those companies to which they have sent proposals. Nine of the proposals that were sent to users for the office part of.the �campus and 14 proposals tor restaurants, hoteis, banks, etc. Ms. Dacy asked, "What did we learn from the market during the last 18 months?" Sometimes it was a mixed rriessage, but they did learn a lot. The Class A market for office space is getting better in the metro area; howeve�, it does not seem to be improving fast enough in the north metro area. Some of the things they heard from the market is, even though Fridley has Medtronic, Onan and a number of very good companies, Fridley has to compete w�th �laces. like Wayzata and Edina which may have more CEn appeal. The southw�st and western communities in the metro area have the advantage of a number of corporate�office developments in one • ].ocation so there is a synergy there. Our site is an isolated site, and we compete with other communities and their development patterns. Mr. Kondrick asked if the costs per square foot are similar.. Are the costs less? Are land costs less? Wouldr�'t that make the property more attractive? . Ms. Dacy stated construction costs are the same throughout the metro area. Even to write down the cost of the land to $1.00, a key.part of.the proposal is to do structured parking and the City is agreeing to provide an increment to the developer to const.ruct /"'`� that parking. In Edina which has the Centennial Office building, PLANNING COrIl�IISSION MEETING SEPTEP�ER 3 1997 PAGE 18 a very similar circumstance exists. They have a parking structure in place and TIF areas in.place. Even though we are in different markets, we• are all offerinq.nearly.the same type of package. At one point we thought we could offer a tax advantage. The property taxes in Anoka County are typically below that in other counties. However, a referendum in that school district altered the tax picture. Over the last six or so years the tax rate in that area has increased. The edges that we thought we had no longer exist. Another issue is that the nature of companies is changing. The era of the campus development such as Honeywell and Medtronic may be gone. Companies are focusing on the bottom line and trying to conserve as much cost as possible. Ms. Dacy stated it is possible that we could get the original vision of 580,000 square feet but there would be no guarantee as to when that would occur. The TIF district expires in 2011. Each year that goes by with the site undeveloped reduces our ability to provide financial incentives. Ms. Dacy stated they have also been getting the "chicken and egg" feedback. The commercial people hesitate to locate a�building there until there is an office bui.lding there. The office building people are hesitant to locate there because the services are not there. That brought us to tech-;flex which is a jargon term for a one-story, high quality building for high tech companies that need flexible space for production and office areas. Ms. Dacy presented a videotape showing.two such buildings - one in Golden Valley and one in Eden Prairie. The Eden Prairie. building site is interesting because it is down the block from a multi-story building and exemplifiecl that a mixed use could occur in the marketplace. This approach is the app.roach that the HRA and the City Council want to pursue on the property: Ms. Dacy stated the video also showed a two-story building in St. Paul. They have input from companies that want to build an � � operati-on center on the property. A two-story building would probably require a larger footprint than a multi-story building. Ms. Dacy stated the City Council and the HRA would like to pursue construction of a 100,000 square foot, one-story tech-flex type of building on the west part of the �ite and reserve the east part of the office park for a multi-story development of approximately 250,000 square feet. The HRA has agreed to temporarily extend the contract to allow MEPC to go to their board to get approval on the one-story building. .The City Council and the HRA are concerned . about the length of time the site has remained vacant. Since 1987 when the theater was removed and the utilities and streets installed, the City has been actively trying to market the site for its original vision. The City Council and HRA felt that the tech-flex concept does not detract from the image and could � � �-'� /'� PLANNING CONIl�IISSION MEETING, SEPTEI�ER 3,. 1997 PAGE 19 /'� attract a high quality company that could stimulate interest and attract other development. � Ms. Dacy stated this is a mixed use approach - one story plus the multi-story. However, it initiates a pro-active approach on this site which can be accomplished within the TIF timeframe. �he would be happy to forward any comments to the City Council and HRA. In the next two to three months, they will be researching a 100,000 square foot proposal in more detail. Mr. Sielaff asked if they need a commitment from a company before constructing a building. Ms. Dacy stated, based an MEPC's experience in.Golden Valle� and Eder� Prairie, they are so confident there will be.a tenant in a one-story.tech-flex that they are going to'their board for a speculative proposal. The City has received a number of .calls over the last one or two years fr.om those types of companies that we.have not sought actively because the vision was always 500,000 square feet of office. Mr. Sielaff asked if there were any restrictions on the amount of space a company could iease in that type o� building. '� Ms. Dacy stated no. It may be the case that one company may need the entire huilding depending on the nature of the business. MEPC did make a proposal to Lawson Software. This mixed used proposal is very close to what they were evaluating - a one-story production space with corporate.offices next door. There could be a user who needs 100,000 square feet but because of the carnpus may want to reserve more space for corporate offices for more development. Mr. Sielaff asked it would reduce the risks involvecl wi�h losing a tenant if you have more tenants. Ms. Dacy stated this was true. There are usually one, two.or three tenar�ts in these types of buildings. The companies are generally of good size and have 100 to 200 employees. There could be a smaller tenant there but that does not seem to be the c�se. Mr. Saba stated he works in a similar type of building. If you drive along I-494 along Bass Lake Road and Wedgewood, the intersections are gorgeous with flowers all summer and well maintained landscaping. Corporations want to bring customers in to show them their product. They don't want the customer to feel as though they are driving through �"bad part of town". �ne gets a good feeling when driving to these facilities. When driving along Highway 65 from I-694 to Mississippi and looking at the �"'� growth in the median, it is not a pretty site. If you want� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTED�ER 3 1997 PAGE 20 /'"-'� something to attract customers to.a corporate center and to impress customers with you.r product and your location, you need tc do something about Highway 65 and also University.Avenue to• maintain what we have. We cannot rely on the state. This may have to be done by the City. The median and the roadside along Highway 65 need an overhaul. It makes all the difference in the world. Corporate centers in Golden Valley have well maintained roads and medians. It is very different in Fridley. If we expect to develop a corporate client that will exit from I-694 and drive up Highway 65, that is not a pretty site. Ms. Savage stated this is a point is well taken. Also, flowers add to the appearance of the city. While on vacation in British Columbia, she was impressed with Vancoaver which is a.beautifui city with flower gardens that were wel'1 tended. The landscaping adds much to the appearance. She thought this is sometl�ing the City needs to work on. Ms. Modig asked who is responsible for the median. Ms. Dacy stated the state is responsible for the median on Highway 65. Staff did write the state about the condition of t.he guard rail from West Moore Lake Drive to East Moore Lake Drive, and they did agree that it was unsightly. They are looking at having sozne of the guard rails replaced as part of the intersection improvement project to start next spring. �. Mr. Kondrick stated, when you trave3 west on I-694 from Highway 65 to University, the road.is high and the land is low. Nothing is worse than looking at the roof of some building with the air conditioning s�stems, etc., as you drive by. At ground level a building may look good, but it looks bad when you are on the roadway. He would imagine there are ways to design around.it so we do not have to look at that especially with a one-story building. He would recommend screening to hide the roof from any passerb�. - Mr. Kondrick stated the video of the tech-flex buiiding in Golden Valley showed in the background a condominium. He knows they mentioned the office parking. What about the idea of condominiums in that area? Do developers find that area too expensive, poorly located, too noisy,�etc., for a possible condominium development on a portion of the prope �ty? Would that be impossible to have on a portion of the site;?� ' r Ms. Dacy stated the developer has not approached the City for a residential use. On the other hand, tYie master plan has always leaned toward.the corporate office,park. A highrise condominium could be developed on the site: She thought the primar.y issue was an economic one. An owner/occupied development would not produce �"'1 � � . PLANNING CONIl�iISSION MEETING, SEPTII�ER 3, 1997 PAGE 21 the amount of taxes that office space would. The pianning for this site is that intensifying the site is th� best use for the property; and when the TIF distriet expires, there will be the maximum amount of return to the community as a whole. Mr. Sielaff asked if the buildings were being marketed as regional headquarters or as corporate headquarters. Ms. Dacy stated the marketing is generally as office space. She did not know if there has been a distinction made between corporate headquarters and regional headquarters. It is marketed as a full service campus where companies can locate for office, production and/or research and development. The interested parties have proposed a gamut of different types of uses from an operation type of center to corporate headquarters with research and development facilities. Ms. Modig stated her concerns about a one-story is that it puts them in the same mode of operation that we have on I�niversity Avenue near 79th where the majority of whieh are empty. Ms. Dacy stated, in terms of the one=story, this is a different market than that development would have. It is a different � market, a different interior and. a different exterior. We would exert more control in this development because�of the master plan. Those developments are more the office/warehouse and industrial types of buildings. This is specified for th+e high tech use. Mr. Sielaff stated, for 250,000 square feet, how many stories would that be. Ms. Dacy stated 250,000 square feet could be accommadated in two 125,000 square foot buildings with a range of four to six stories depending on the proposal by the company. - Mr. Sie-laff asked if this would be away from the residential areas. Ms. Dacy stated yes. The parking lots are to the north between the buildings and the residential area. Mr. Kondrick asked if they dare spend more money to make it marketable, such as adding ponds, fountains, brick,.etc. What if we spent $1 million to make the site more beautiful than it is now? Can we spend some rnoney to get back more? Ms. Dacy stated realistically the City has done much to make the site attractive. The roads and utilities are in. Some people think it is a park. What detracts from the site is the function �1 of the intersection. It took 18 months to get approvals on the PLANNING CONIl��lISSION MEETING SEP't'F'�FR 3 1997 pAGE 22 �'"1 design of the intersection and construction is hoped to get going next spring. A company will look at the cost of the land, what they can do on the site and how that will affect the bottom line. With the TIF district in place, the incentive is there: It is true that Edina has some other advantages that helped. This site tends to be isolated but it has excellent visibility. Once there is activity on the site, there will be more attraction to the site and more interest. She thought they have to get the first building up. 5. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1997 MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to receive the minu�es of the Appeals Commission meeting of August 13, 1997. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSI�Y. 6. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY & ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 19, 1997 Mr. Sielatf stated the minutes of the August 19th meeting had not yet been approved by the Environmental Quality & Energy Commission ^ (EQE) and asked that these minutes be received by the Planning . Commission after EQE approval: OTHER BUSINESS: Mr. Hickok provided an update on the progress being made at the Menards property. Mr. Hickok stated the.Planning Commission meeting of September 17 which will be a Comprehensive Plan meeting as well. .- ADJOURN�lENT MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to adjourn the � meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CAAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED A1QD TgE SEPTEI�ER 3, 1997, PLANNING COl�lISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:10 P.M. - �° Respectfully submitted, Lavonn Cooper Recording Secretary � S I G N- IN S H E E T . . � PLANNING COMMISSIaN.MEETING� � . Name Address/Business � �N/4� ( [S a� 7 l �f , d � Qv `� � �- D �o� �¢ ' � � � � �"�� l�aii ��-�.� -�-- , l � � t , . �� _ , � �- �� ` p ' j �,� � �% C'7 � .� _ j c-? �,i � �C �' � � rpi.�� MEMOI�:ANDIJM D�VE�E��'l�#E�TT D-�RECTOR . . DATE: September 12, 1997 TO: ; Planning Commission Members FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Ptanning Assistant SUBJECT: � Survey Results fror�n Planning:Area,#3 > >- �� Attached are copies of survey results received as of Wednesday, September 10, 1997. A summary of the information will be available at Wednesday evening's meeting. For the Commission's information, I have attached a sheet of guidelines in which the Chair will read aloud prior to conducting the Planning Area Meeting: �4t the September 17, 1997 meeting, we would like to accomplish two things: 1. Find out what residents want Fridley to be in the year 2010. 2. Find out what role Fridley plays ii� the larger regional picture. To that end, staff will distribute a two page handout that the attendees will be asked to complete. The handout will ask the following questions: 1. If Fridley were to be the ideal community in the year 2010, what characteristics or experiences would you expect it to offer? 2. What role or coles does Fridley plan in the larger MinneapolisJSt. Paul region? � As residents come to the podium, the Planning Commission should focus their comments around these two questions. If residents have a specific °complaint", they Survey Resuits from Planning Area #3 September 12, 1997 Page 2 should be asked to provide a solution to the problem. We hope that this will be a positive experience #or everyone and to avoid a°complaint session" about specific properties, staff, and councilmembers. We wa�t residents to voice their concems but also to provide positive suggestions for solutions. Staff will present a summary of the survey responses to those in attendance. A large map of the Planning Area will be posted in the lobby as residents amve. The map will have notations from the surveys posted on it for the residents to review. Resident comments will be recorded as they are presented. The comments from �h� meeting will be incorporated in the Plan document. � S H/dw M-97-3�7 ,''� .. __. - -- � � � a Prior to the Planning Area Meeting on September 17, 1997, please take the time to � answec-these four questions. Fold the survey on the dotted lines on the reverse side, tape, ar�d plaee a stamp in the upper right corner and drop in the t�a�t. Surveys may also be dropped off at City Hall or the library: Ptease �eturn the survey by Septembe� 10, 1997. The results will be discussed at the Planni�g Area meeting. What do you like about Fridley? @��+,�-�.V ��uv�. �"o i�w ��{� W k- W%� - �� ctit,� � i,u,�.��; 6 . � �� '�,^ �,m, i,�;��c; t��,�c 2�� .� ��V j L� �+U'� , _. �__ �. � � i:�-u' � c�-� �-�:� � � What do you disiike about your �`� neighbofiood? � : -: - i� ,a�`" �f F . . ?�: � a .. R - fl- - - �... __ f �- :�:� �i� 4 ,� , ' _./ \ _ _ 11,_ 4 . � � ' ` � `� i � , . ,+ R: What do you dislike about Fridley? � �7 , �? �� / �}J � . � f..�_ �i/ L��Z.I� ""'�L� r.�-�'%r%l Q t� �a '�-�, " ��n — L��.. I/� ,1..�� a� .,ii ' — � i�"I(.. u71 �� , . ; t, ;v � � l�,l '�li.t,' '4%� �,'�1 �� — �i.. i' ,1 . i: x. r. /_ y�11�: .. 7/ � . -��:- . . V1lhatsdo you like .about youur-neighbofiood? }- `' ` . y:�� f�n�, �� C�� `� ' ,� � : . �� . . �. :...._ ... s , _ � s� _ . . _ ..y . ._ ._ .. _.. --•------------------------•------._.._..-------: : Please fill out the foliowing demographic information. All responses are anonymous. � Male � : � Female '�- - Age i�. Fridley Resident � a�Length of Residency . ----�---� ---------�---------------------------------------------------------- Fridley Business Owner Visitor Prior to the Planning Area Meeting on September 17, 1997, please take the time to answer these four questions. Fold the survey on the dotted lines on tfie reverse side, tape, and place a stamp in the upper right comer a�d drop in the mail. Surveys may also be dropped of# at City Ha1i or the library. Please re#urn the survey by Septembe� 10, 199T. The results will be discussed at the Planning Area meeting. What do you like about Fridley? *Good protection of property rights. *Good police force to safeQUar neig borhoods. *Adequate parks (Locke & Madse and nature center nearb ^Good library facility ^Good churches �H[� 7 1��y��i ng ('.Pn i-s�r rnn.�an � � ience, ; *Neta businesses com:ing in to city & opportunities for employment. ^Retirement homes and apart_ ment complexes for elderly. Whai do you disiike about you� :., ;•.. .. _. . neighborhood? " � ' : ' . . . �. :, :,,. - Have none.. �� 's _ .. ,.✓_� �� What do you dislike about Fridley? Have no dislikes. � ,CQMiy1ENT� Let `s keep the "status - '�-----•__. quo" witl� cur city run locally without state or federal influence or involvement. � � � ,. � _ ��1fiai.do you like about your neighborhood? � t,,,.. . r. _. �,.. . . . *Fri.endlq. neighbors . *Good "Neighborhood Crime Wat.ch Program" *Sa#e.atmosphere to raise children. �Alcohol and drug free for most part. *Conv�nience of fresh fruit market at "Bob�s Produce" and a1�o�McGlynn`s . , Bakezy . *Neighbo�hood kept clean. ' *Columbia l.�� Arena for sports _. ' ----� ------------------------------- �----------�---- �------�--------------•---•----------•-------•--------------._......----- : Please fip out the following demographic information. AI! responses are anonymous. Ma1e � � Age . X Female '•-•--••-•---._....---•••••-•---•--•- X Fridley Resident Ftidley Business Owner Z 9 Length of Residency Visitor years ......-•--••---•---------•-•--------------•••••---•--...-•-•-•----..__..._.---�-- � � Prior to the Planning Area Meeting on September 17, 1997, please take t0�e time to �"''� answe� these four questions: Foid the survey on the dotted lines on the reverse side, tape, and place a stamp in the upper right corner and drop in the maii. Surveys may also be dropped off at City Hait or the library. Piease return the survey .by Septembe� 10,1997. The results will be discussed at the Pianning Area meeting. � What do you like about Fridley? ,� � , - �: ..�- �� r � �� / . . � What do you distike about your �� eighbofiood? �''° - -_ �- � �-f� , _ /.! Li� i , �w. � �i �`�� i�;�. �tt.� v„ � _ - - - ./i..si��D��i / �e�i�l H /I�P i�-- / f �- � � /� a..� /1 ` / L � �� ■ What do you dislike about Fridfey? �)� �f J , .I� .. t �r'i % � r!" _ T j//l�j!r � /. fi; ' �.st_/`. -r.�,;�:? . '�� t-- .:.'S',' .. _ i� , f: 7 ✓ � �'�`�' �' � �/LA/�` J6Y.%J a1L �G�'n�v _ , + . . - : p �; �(tiat;dO you like about..your neighborhood? in ; . - _. - - . -!�'7 � .//� ��-: �i�� .�J/ � S�/ _/� _ _ _ _ . o.. : " � .. ---•--•----••------•••----°•••----------••---••---••.......--•-•--•---.._---• •---•-----••--•••-••--•-••-----......: : Please fill out the foliowing demographic information. All responses are anonymous. � l�Mate S�Age �— . Female � ..................�------ � Fridley Resident a�,Length ofi Residency � -----....-�------�-------�------------------------ Fridley Business Owne� Visitor ----�---�-------------�------�------ a Prior to the Ptanning Area Meeting on September 17, 9997, please take the time to answer these four questions. Foid the survey on the dotted lines on the reverse.side, tape, and ptace a stamp in the upper right comer and drop in the mail. Surveys may also be dropped off at City Hall or the library. Please return the survey by September 9 0 199T The resuits will be discussed at the Planning Area meeti�g �� • .�- . f � �/e �'�-�- �-e .r � �' e 0 v c� �� l��Y�l �� °es_ i What do you dislike abou# your , neighbofiood? � ` F. + �i F' _� � ` , � r �" . lso oc , S � . � � �.� r` � c. vi. � al� aionk �h�vPr.s�� er�� .Ser'z°_.ol What do you disiike about Fridley? � ; ; � , �� r<- � -�' ;- �s � � � f �Gl� d YI1� i� _ �'� �I�''�o%J r�� '-✓C�(�J'� % �� is i�o ;=�= �- 1/ lt a 5��-'r� ua'� � �. l C�c 1.� l�f �h �h� ' %G� �.� �n �t` c�J2. Ci�l� Ci �o �,.Se Q�;ntes�•C`��' i '== �a.sQ � � -��- ' � �_ p 1 � �� .9i�t� �- b ' t -Wtrat�do-you.l�ke;abrout. our; e� h�bamood? Y- � J `� r .-�T . . � �. $�;�. . � . , 1 � t�:��.�/�.}:��e �. ��?r.c�%,` ��4�i rJ � � �� ia �� t �: �r� - � �� h��_ a r�-�� l co �� _� �.:� �,.� . �' '. �ur -ra es. ur-e e c • . 6C n✓J � t 1.f�i li I/I �!ns t/�5�1'� - e -•••--.....•-•••--••••-•----•---•••••-• ..............................•----------•----••----•-••---------...._.....____....------•-••--•--•--•----•--...---- : Please fiii out the following demographic information. All responses are anonymous. Mate � Age � Fridiey Resident Fridiey Bus�ness Owner :� Female �3 Length of Residency Visitor ��-��------------------��-�---�--�---------..........-�._.----------------------------..._..._......---------------�-�-----�-----�------� --...--------.. � � Prior to the Planning Area Meefing on Se �rnber '17, 1997, please take the time to answer these four questions. Fold the su ey on the dotted lines on the reverse side, tape, and place a stamp in the upper rig comer and drop in the maii. Surveys may also be dropped off at City HaA or the li ary. Piease return the survey by September 10, 1997. The resuits will be discussed t the Planning Area meeting. What do you like about Fridley? / � � �.' � :.r� , ��. _ 1��:.��1✓ . � . : What do you dislike about .. . . ... • ��y�/+�1,*"r / �/ / � � � %�� _��.��._ .�i.� /,ic�.c�/ / . � r�� i�� _ � . � =- -.,...�,sc� �' a r� �: _ . �, _ ,. ,, �c� �„�� _ �' . . - - . .� tJ�S°.ii..=�`. .��- �` �� YYII��o�you like a�ut your neighborho�i? �,=�;>; a . _ _ -:,;_ � ` � � i � � : � �_1`� r ,�� / ,��/ � / ,l � L .:.�:. ' �� ! �4 � '/� ... � ,wii T � � � �� • . . • � ,_ - ` ��e� �-�tib�Q- .�%t v�ie' r�.IQ/y . ••----•-• .............•-...••••---.........__.._....•-•••-----•-•--•-•..._.....•••-•--••---•---••---•---••----•-•-••-•---•••-••-�----•------•-----•--•••••---.. : Please fill out the following demographic infoRnation. All responses are anonymous. � Mal.e � Age ,� Fridley Resident Fridley Business Owne� _ Female ��rs.tength of Residency Visito� / ---------------------------�---------...._...._....-------........--------��----------�-----�----------..........._. Prior to the PI answer thes tape, and pl c also be drop� 10, 199T. The , What do you li. � � � � anning Area Meeting on September 17, 1997, please take #he time to four questions. Fold the survey on the dotted lines on the �everse side, �e a stamp in the upper rigtit corner and drop in the maii. Surveys may sd off at Ciiy Hatl or ihe library. Please return �e sunrey by September results will be discussed at the Planning Area meeting. about Fridley? �� / .� �/ � _ , f- ; � • ° �,.,�.�i.�� ' I What do you dislike neighborhood? �� t �� out your . , � -_ , - f �"� What do you disiike about Fridley? �� ``� � �� /� , _ . � � � � "�!I".i'��,-%'� .��ii��/ �,.��%-'.l_�� L'1/ ( "�/j'_/,'/ C.�.tt-� G��"'._/ ��if'ti'l%� - " � ..,�i✓ ��L - y.,� � �. ,-- What do' �tou �'ike� about your neighborhood? _.- � _,�� :: � - - . � t :--.....----�------------------------�� ------._.--�--...----......_....--------�-�--------------------------------...--------- . -------------------�----.......--------...-----...--------�-----�-: : Please fiil out the following demographic information. A!I �esponses are anonymous. i Ma1e � ,G�Age � Fridiey Resident Fridley Business Owner ,� � ��Female ;� „"� G-.Length of Residency Visitor � � � --------------- --------------�---�---...--�--------� ----�---�---��-----�-- �--�----......� --�-�----------�-�- �----------�---------------�-----��---�-�----------�-----....----------------------- � P�ior to the Planning Area Mee#i�g on September 17, 1997, please take the time to answer these four questions. Fold the survey on the dotted tines on the reverse side, tape, and piace a stamp in the upper right comer and drop in the mail. Surveys may also be dropped off at Ciiy Hall or the library.. Piease retum the survey by September 10,199T. The results wi�l be discussed at the Planning Area mee6�g• . ., �� What do you like about Fridley? o�� r�- �'s r2S i0� ��OVs6 o��C��°� s��'' � '�a�r��/.��,�L � G'��ovG,o /1J� l/� � � �i�,,o�� m�'� you disiike about your -. . ._ �:� � ��y� �.,.,. � ��....r : . .:..•. :>l . ,�,.i..::e:Ye•.IiF';... � .= /' � i . .. � `is�/� . ' `' : � . a '4 w r: ��.v •5��1/� ��Ls� � �Oti ' ��So r'�' ' What do you dislike about Fridley? /S % ��/ ��GicAD��I� ��iti� O/1J !%.1///��y°� -- `i /�' �� O� �� o�- ��° �-�o� � Q�.v C �c4-i�l� — �o �2� y � � 1/.G'G�J�S ��e��r�i�lG-� �- �Gv� : �o/�� i��.��, � -s� �o� , : What do.you�fike.-about your neighborhood? r��'.'.~ ..,, .f:- : . /%/�/.S�r'.S �.�� [°.4�� - : �� GI/G �d ��" i �f.'9/ L�� .OJN/�° ��/� .O yG� C. � ' � ' 4 :. ...' "' """"""' """"'"""' ""... """"""""' .. _ ... ""'""""'""""""""�.....""'""""..... _ .. . : : Please fill out the foiiowing demographic information. A11 responses are anonymous. /'�� Male �04 Age Fridley Resident Fridtey Business Owner � Female �.� Lettgth of Residency Visitor � ---._...---�---�--�------�----- -�-------------- Prior to the Planning Area Meeting on September 17, 1997, please take. the time to answe� these four questions. Fold the survey on the dotted lines on the reverse side, tape, and place a stamp in the upper right comer and drop in the mail. Surve� may also be dropped off at City Hall or the library. Please return the survey by September 10, 1997. The results wiil be discussed at the Planning Area meeting. What do you like about Fridley? / �!� iU/�:.11 c�L- l,-�L /� -;?��.�;,, .t _ �/r:,L l/ � S7i, c�t �' �., .:� /� � � �; t s{.9 c: � ✓ r . + Wha# do you dislike ab�ut your neighborhood? � . Y'. _ . � •�t « u ! L d,.✓j ! S J rt� i � a 11 t, �-✓� n 1 crs c ��.. �-ItI? H 1�, �� o _ j�t�r��'�4 zo�c, a�� b y'' .1rRF6 � ... What do you dislike about Fridley? ( � � � �� / �,, _.,. h,; ! � , ;� _l<�. <<:! : 1, � � / %�i � c �. � GtJ��- /,y� 4" %�' � " � '''7 : Wh.a# :do yoo like�abo�t your- neighborhood? 1 + �_" �i�l / . C I �'1 7G/ �G� I ! %�t i�v/ _ lC -r n y t.J( G✓C, c ( �U �C / fGT �l,��« �.. � . - . . .. .. . . . �w' Nl �OJtr✓lrc, i1 /� %�, Gf/�ai � ; ---._...----••-----------�-------------------------------•-••-•------._,..------.....--•-•---•-----•----•----•----------------•�----_..------�•--------------._.--------- Please fill out the following demographic information. All responses are anonymous. Male � Age � Female � Fridley Resident i . � r� �Length of Residency Fridley Business Owne,r Visitor ----------------------------�-----�------------�-----....._.....---------�-------------�---------------�----..__...----------........ � Prior to the Planning Area Meeting on September 17, 1997, piease take the time to -- �'+`� answe� these four questions. Fold thesu�r�y�o�=t�►e:ddtted=Cu�s-on�h�ce.��e side,.- -- tape, and place a stamp in the upper righ� c�mer ar�d drop in;-th�=�ailr'St�veys may also be dropped off at City Hatl or the library. Piease return the survey by September 10,1997. The results wiA be discussed at the Planning Area meetin9- Wha# do you like about Fridley? ��'.._� �.. , . .. . - ,. . � �� .� - i {�( ;' ,1 n� r f-' I � ! t`� , ; i 1 � 1. t 1' c 7l . 1' � I J� V �tA .t �n G /b 1 n P,t ,F;-� r, tY {^ mm(>.l � �(,�' ! t ° �` �i �' � 11JI / IC.. _ C�. /� fi-r G .(.( i � �— , �1�,�. . � � . ,.,�, �t�t �CZc.«(' -� , _ , What do you dislike about your .`� � { �•� � ! �eighborhood? . �' '� Y � ,:-�:>> ..., :-, . � -,rk: ��_t :�, �... n ,:>.- .s.._ f� � L�� .� -��-'��. �_.'.. _ /. : i i .'.c . I �L_ . l. .l.:J i'_� / ir/ ' / _/ � � � �� / I�/ / I' .�/,/ ei� �.f / I . t� . ` ' ..% L .� / I i� _ f � l � t�'... �.•�� f What do you dislike about Fridiey? -n r f i��t � j� ,1 . - .,�n n � �" � Q O/1�. (' � �. �l T ,� i'1 (� -" ,��-/) Q' D�.f/�.� ✓l �9 7' A°-7'i ��?i' n J i � n n � �i��'r mr' — �l � � . �� : � �. -/ . ,, . � A.�4.' ��IVhat�lo��ou like aboutyouur neighborhood? ; _::z2-;'� t�� - i'z=,_, _ -; f _ _ < . ,: .; • _ �a-�-� � � d� � ��t. -��c, ��c. �� ,.y�l �'� r�°�2 � ----------------------�--------....._...--•------�---------------------...----------...-------._...-------�----------------------- Please fill out #he following demographic information. All responses are anonymous. ,� ?� Mate � Age � Fridley Resident Fridley Business Owner �-�I� c ctm�n Pn�� . : '�Female � Length of Residency Visito� . �i�p . J � --=--------�-----------------------------------------�---------�---�------...---- •----�----------�-�-----�------------------��---�----..., . Prior to the Planning Area Meeting on September 17, 1997, piease take ihe time to answer these four questions. Fo1d the survey on the dotted lines on the �everse side, tape, and place a stamp in the upper right c�mer and drop in_ tF�e mail. Surve s. ma a�so be dropped of# � C�y H�I� or the lib�ary. P(ease return the sunrey by Se tember 10, 1997. The resuits will be discussed at the Planning Area meeting. P� What do you like about Fridley? �'��5 �� P�I�S What do you dislike abou# your neighborhbod? �� 2.heu ��e.'�" y �_" �� . t � What do you dislike about Fridley? oo� C��ie��erv�c� �f� t�,�,�^in 1 �l� af..� �ne� d 5 �b�, . �� .- Whai .do-you like.about your neighbor�ood? = � ��--s �= :a : . `� a� " �� %s ------------------------------- --- --- � - ------------------------------------------------------------------- Please fill out the following demographic information. Ali responses are anonymous. � Ma1e Z-�Age � Fridley Resident . Fridiey Business Owner Female ye G � � Length of Residency Visitor .. _— _..� Prior to the Planning Area Meeting on September '17, 1997, piease take ihe time to -'� answer these four questions. Fold the survey on the dotted li�es on the reverse� s-ide; . tape, and place a stamp in the upper right'_e�er~and dropin-th� _mait:� Sunrey�-ma�+-- - also� be dropped off at City Hall or the library. Please return the surv�ey �by September 10,1997. The results wiil be d'�scussed at the Planning Area meeting. What do you like about Fridiey� �� S�u�� Wtiat do you dislike about your -_ _ • . � _ 1_ _ 'L _ _ JA • '� • . . �4/ �f .. i.f . . � t. . �, ;!: � � . �, r�i^'� . . - i. � �� . . � ... . - � / :i � ' � /- - ' , �_ii�,. .. i _i� e� -- � . , % � �.� � � � �/ _�.=� � / What�do-you.like,aboutXour neighborhood? �� i�//'/,�I � / /ii � / ��' � 'LL , / � � � /L�� .._.......-•---•---...• ..................••-•.._....-••---.._..••-°----•--•�--•---...-------•--•----•--•--..__.._..--•-••---• •-•- : Please fill out the following demographic information. Ail responses are anonymous. , � Male �Age �ridley Resident Fridley Business Owner � . . _ Female � 30� Length of Residency ...................................�--� �------....._....--------------------------------------- Visitor Prior to the Pla�ning Area Meeting on September 17, 1997, please take the time to answer these four questions. Fold tt�e surve�r on the dotted lines on the �everse side, tape, and place a stamp in the upper right cort�er and drop in the mait. Surveys may also be dropped off at City Hall or the library. Piease return #he survey by September 10, 1997. The results will be discussed at the Planning Area meeting. What do you iike about Fridley? 1�J� '_:l �� 11. 1, L� . � ► � �� .�l r�i:1. .: o• . . ..e • - • •• •�• _� 1 _. e_` � . � .. . . � :� L"� ; i1: � �I . .s � �. What da you dislike about Fridley? �� ,�_" j` I / I � ur? ..s� .�.�- - , _ � . • = V�tiat� do: you �iike about your neighborhood? � �'� � _-<<��; : ��1i�Q:: .. . ! _ � v.a` � . .:.s i�ti-.- • ;'�,t '�l • ► , , � f - � s1.11 � , I. _ — �, -----•---------------•-------...-------•--•--._...------..__....--------...._..------�--•----•----------•----------------•-- Please fill out the following demographic information. All responses are anonymous. � Male �, �ia Age �' � �� Female � ........................�---�-�---�--------- �Fridley Resident r%- �Length of Residency Fridley Business Owner Visito� � Prior to the Planning Area Meeti�g on September 17, 1997, please take the.time to �� answer these four questions. Fold the sutvey or�the dotted-lines.on the.reverse_ side, tape. and� place a stamp in the upper �i+ght comer=ar�d�drop ir�.the n?a�1•- Sunreys, may also be dropped off at City Haii or the library. Please return the �nrvey by September 10,1997. The res�ilts wiil be discussecl at the Planrnng Area mee 9 What do you like about Fridley? / ;�r * � 0 w r � v ' , � , - What do you di neighborhood? � '��c�v► �. �` '..p . s K� tj ` � `� � ., � � t� ; � _ ., •:. l , :. . . + about your . . ; :-., ' �: , . What do you dislike about Fridley? ''� • � �. `� � �' - � �� .. . . �•,�� ' �� , � ,,� � �•• �� i � L� � � � � � - ' � � i �vw � i- � . , �� _.1,. ' D ' vC:h , -�b r` [� �� .•• i •• ►_. �� ' il:� l �_ ��. . ' � .a. aI � � . � , � �� ` � �� ` �� , i� •_�_ _ � _ . _ i- --_ __ . i,L ...__ _—... � . .. _... -••--• •---------------••---•--....----•-------- I : Ple e fill out the followir,g demographic information. All responses are anonymous. I' ale �, Age � Fridley Resident Fridley Business Owner �''� j' r` �r Female "11�Length of Residency Visitor . � . --------------�----�--�-------� � � Prior to the Pianning Area Meeting on September 17, 1997, please take the time to answer these four questions. Fold the survey on the dotted lines or� the reverse side, tape, and place a stamp in the upper right comer and drop in the mail. Surveys may also be dropped off at City Hall or the library. Please retvrn the survey by September 90, 1997. The results will be discussed at the Planning Area meeting. What do you like about Fridley? .-- . - '_S Tr�� i� � ,��:',' G� �. OC''�/ ' ' ' �r�- /� i.- �e ,��.��'�;� �_ ��r,/-� i � . j`,; i /-- �Y ,r- �,� � �. �� Whaf do you. dislike abou# your � neighborhood? � :�� S T/',�,E i ,C-"��/�,c�/�ir�� /'/.�/� ./ . What do you dislike about Fridley? � . r/�� r, � �'-=_ /r'�.��a,�✓ .G %i/ii � � � f�/'�/'u'i�l'/i?G�r / ��i�'Cv y"�"l , %P� i�lir��; � � Po � � S ii�f/_ � L� Y��✓ _� What�d.o.,y_ou:like,abou#yc�r neighborhood? , �- f . . , . � �_��J _% �1�i1%F.1/ '��'/1/ ?� � 7 e�'�l T / � 1�/ � ------------------��-------------------...-----------�----�--�-------...----------------......--------------�---------------------------..__._.....--- : Please fill out the following demographic information. All responses are anon.ymous. � � Male Female �--�----------------------- %� Age � Fridley Resident FridJey Business Owne� v�s � Length of Residency Visitor - ----------------------------�--�---- /``, ^ Prior to the Planning Area Meeting on September 17, 1997, please take the time to answe� these fout questions. Fold the survey on the dotted lines on the reverse side, tape, and place a starr�p in the upper right oomer and drop in the mail. Sunreys may also be dropped off at City Hall or the library. Please return the survey by September 10, 1997. The results wn'il be discussed at the Ptanning Area meeting. � What do you iike about Fridley? . , L - �/ �` °,. �� -�r� � �:;:1,-�__.--vt_c; � �i �- � '�J What do you disiike about Fridfey? � L\ \ � � -- �� U �,��;�'�. - ,, '�- `, � � ��:..� �, .� ..,; L ' � �' - `ti . ,� � � t What do you dislike about your . _. . �D - . � � � .�.. \� y n �� / l.c,, �- 1 � n •. °�:-:: � �_� _ � - =1Miat�do you like:about yvur neighbofiood? _ .,-�:_ , .�.� . � p r t • FR F �' 1 I t� =.' � �: � � . :_ � ° 1,� �P D., �' ,. .. -�--- �"I� • _ I , t ��i� � G.�f' :�� S� �r-��" �' 1' i 1d y LC i C�-�, �' '� �� - L,- :�-� _ .� � .,s\ en�� t-�- r.. � , 3 '�� j�y`":� � ` �i'�'� �cl , � v v�� (� �` {''. , � �� ^ � i �--►—�. � 1`% . ��'"li l��i� ry! _i✓ `�-L^ . _ �- � . r ._. - _ - --•---• ...............•-•.....------••---•••••---•--------•-----...---•••--...---°----•----••-•-----......-•------._...---• : Please fili out the following demographic information. AI! responses are anonymous. � Male �� T Age � Fridley Resident : � Female �3�Length of Residency �� --� -�---- - �--��- ---------�- - --- -�-------------------------�--------------------...---...------ Fridley Business Owner Visitor --------------�-----.....--�----------- Prior to the Planning Area (�eeting on September 17, 1997, please take the time to answe� these fou� questions. Fold the survey on the dotted lines on the reve�se side, tape, and place a stamp in the upper right corner a�d drop in the mail. Surveys may also be dropped off at Ci�y Hall oF the library: Piease return the sunrey by September 10, 1997. The resuits wiii be discussed at the Planning Area meeting. What do you tike about Fridfey? , ,'`'z" �� c `''( L � 1s 11 (' , �(',�' c �n�� , ��`� 7 •��"w � —l., ,�1� R �i2L��%' t-C:-,,� . ,.��-�.t�/' ,%' -(,-L�-�- �L � What do you dislike about your neigtiborhood? �. .- . . . .`�: . _ , • l . y, . ■ '""" "'" .............................. What do you disiike about Fridley? ��2s2� �-[�'T-ti .�'Y1�i�yy� �� ; , ��./ s /'�' � �� i —k-2t_F'YQ�LI � i.Q � � �'c--��-1t �.C.�Q , :. - - i L-�Ci`—L.� .�_--c�L.� ��—n�'._ %'�--r�C�/1 ? . ��- �`� `"� ,�- ,(�,'� �'c_rc�' �i �� W#�at,�do you,like about your:r�eighborhood? �t�fi^•�=• � 3i /1 :�`M� �i' . � � / . /� / , � � � � � ��// ! � � �I � � ' �1 i � .�� / . � _ �L � /� � / � / � � .�,i... �/ ..� r � , /, . _�. _ i� � _ Please fiN out the following demographic information: All responses ace anonymous: Male � Age � Fridley Resident �( Fridley Business Owner � Female � Le�gth of Residency Visitor ..----�---��---�-----�--�--�-----�---...-----�-�---------�--------------------------------------------------------�--------....---� �, � �, � Prior to the Planning Area Meeting on September 17, 1997, please take the time to answe� these fou� questions. Fold the sutvey on the dotted lines on the reverse side, tape, and place a stamp in the upper right comer and drop in the mail. Surv Se t mber also be dropped off at City Hall or the library. Piease retucn the survey by p 10,1997. The results will be discussed at the Planning Area meeting. What do you iike about Fridley? :' a �i'� i o .� /� ✓ �7 � �%� `, `� `� _; C ��lJ- �`/ � � �� r (/ j° �� !c - ,�-----� �� ,, �� ;� ��-�- What do you dislike �bout your _ _ �neighborhood? . -:.:;; � = ��:.� = , ::: ;� d YfiQ ��},�' �dw�R � vl.f .T '.: ..S%G�tff�rS /�%��-S -�� ou.�a� - ---------------�--�---�-------......... .-------.....----- : Please fiH out the following derr�ographic infoRnation. Atl responses are anonymous. �� ^� Male � Age �Fridley Resident ,�, Fridley Business Owner . �— Female �� / 3�Length of Residency Visitor ��--�----..... ---�-� ------------- �� -�------�-�----------- What do you disiike about Fridley? � � • %, �,,��/1 l� �s �,J�:S� / ✓f/i �i ��i'r - � - ,� r= rrL�� y �: ��r11 �i - �i�/� — i � .� "� ._ _,�. �� (i' :�i� ✓��'4� "� /'✓ .'�� S ' !1� � `.� �. � �• ff / l ir%�l" ,aI/D /�/r'�//J.�C'-/x� '- �; �'.; ��_= ..tr� :1 %/'1/! °�`.�t-'" , � i: /G.��Ci�/�c.�"�f'e� - �=1Nhat�do you lik�e�aboi�t your neighborho�? -Y�;,.� ; a�;%�:_ _ - �: �' . . � p C i ,r �.J _ ;_;,Y p,t,�� c � /��c-'o.l�G� / O.J - �`_G� � / �v - - . ° - . . � . � _ �� , -�x-�- �:.�- G- G�.�'`�-� �� civ ,�� - � .�� .� �� Prior to the Ptanning Area Meeting on September 17, 1997, please take the time to answer these fou� questions. Fold the survey on the dotted lines on the raverse side, tape. and place a stamp in the upper right comer and drop in the mail. Surveys may also be dropped. off at City tiall or the library. Please return the survey by Septe�ber 10, 1997. The resuits will be discussec! at the Pianning Area meeting. What do you iike about Fridley? ca.r�-�- -�h �N 1C tl-� r1'-'.�'I �t�� Z 1,�e. �,! �u..�' -�� - , , l �� cv �' C�cc. i � �I G a{'�e- �� + � � � � `� � � !.�s.J-- � �; � �i�,r� 5� �y,,;�.t� _-- �a�� t �� ;��+�;;� ari ec., Y.�� (� . , r ' �.� . . . . . . . . . _ - . . . . . .o ' .. � Y r. �ta Dt,� t�r� %u! d �: �► �a., , �-v 5`pe� c� �i� X ��ls /�rvr.L, �-a pu �— �- 13i`.}�,� I � �--wal 1c. �,. �,�a u N, J , __. _ . _ . � � ��- � �e�� z� � � . � , �_,= �� u.s� � .LN ��- a � � c �� ,v � What do you dislike about Fridley? < �f < _ 1 �i�: C�,�l� Crl E i��! L�I e„ �Z.��, h'� Iyl i�i � I�diJ /�i' �� 'laU.�� tl�rv 1 �: I .:- �jo .�� o� U N�J � rtii��ss��s�;�.�; �- � a� � �-ia� �- ��a� I��s C at 1� � ��1� . a��.;N �� -��,1—i'�c�� 1, uu. C� v�. i 5e _ �� h� � _. . , � j G��V iCN{ ir�� ►U ddu+: n-�w1 ��S � e : ..� . ' � " � ��. � �. . ,. � What do�you°liite about your.neighborhood? �#�t :�_ � �� : / -�' �n��,��-, . _ � . - is . �,�- � o �._. i� �,� ,� d_ �� C�� . �� - . �i< d-i. � �, �(.a n � i. P�j �� -� t� �i � t� I -�' G,-� �� i,� � : �-----------------------------------�--------��---------------------------�------------...----------.._.._--------�---------......-----------------�-��------.. : Please fill out the following demographic info�mation. Ali �esponses are anonymous. Male �� Age � Fridiey Reside�t � Fridiey Business Owner .� Female �l � �1 Le�gth of Residency Visitor ...---�-- � -------�------------------------- v �-•�..-:. -------------------- . . ..,:. � ...................: � Prior to the Planning Area Meeting on September 17, 1997� please ta�ce the time to answer these four questions. Fotd the survey on the dotted lines on the reverse side, tape, and place a stamp in the upper right comer and drop in the mail. Surveys may also be dropped off at City Hall or the tibrary. Ptease return the survey by September 10, 1997. The results wiil be discussed at the Planning Area mee�n9• What do you like about Fridiey? �E�/r�L LO�n'��/ ��2i�� ; �'��c 5 : `�? �1'/r/�/_ L Di 'V'l�E� iEf'�/i�% !l� %��}`1. 012 v ��. �� S�n�A-�� /�kES � What do you dislike about yout �_ � . . _ , . . ..-. , �.. . ._.. .... neighborhood? .� �°�J r��#:.do�you like about your neighborhood? -� � .� �.-, � � ` _ _.13�. . . What do you dislike about Fridley? �/�lr�,�/��L � �� '�=i;�'� i /'� , �J�Z�/G� , `L��« 0� � I�v��f`/ ��T��l��}� � , d � I7�'t",�7 / t�l I J � r �� S�%z � _HI ��U�S �j , � . � J i �;;�i' � ;��scr;��iJG ��`G /r'�%v. ��_ .I�r��/G I'2o�«� .�� .�..: � : �;� I . �a� Pr��t�� . P�rcK�n/ l��f .5��i � � .. -;- : . . ��DLL l/F � 1CL£�5:: - - �l/ I� � _: _ �irsi�/�ss f�� 1��,��/c�- � :. ��i�s-= ;: �r��s:�;. �v��- .� �/2 /�f1/b L . L�I�LL £�PT �f21�5 %l��n� tEr� S�y� /fdvs�-� ;, %%�-1> �.�.�I�l T�2�� i2 .. D �X�� :�-/ZF. �t : . � � ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------= ; Piease fill out the following demographic information. All responses are anonymous. �� Male Age Female � ......................�---�-----._.....----- X Fridley Resident Length of Residency Fridley 8usiness Owner Visitor ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prior to the Planning qrea I��9 answer these four questions. Fold tape, and place a stamp in the �pp also be dropped off at City Hall or t 10, 1997. The resu(ts will be disc�,� What do you like about Fridley'� � September 17, 1997, please take the time to e survey on the dotted lines o� the reverse side, right corner and drop in the maii. Surveys rriay library. Please return the survey by September d at the Planning Area meeting. � �� i� � . � � /% �� ; �-�c� �� G�L�c=a_� . —?-�'�r� �� p�� r�� .� ,� ��.� ,�= :f. �.�-,:�J. What do you distike about your -_� nei�hborf�ood? �0�,�� ,-,..., , : �t'L.�: � �..�� +'~ � A�r: �F� '��„d,-EQ� °. �� !�% , 1 , '� !� ,�� . `/ '`� i;.i�L� . Il% , � � �- � �� ' ' � iriiiei' '� � �� / i�� r �i�� 1Nhat do you dislike about Fridley? y�-( � � cr .Gl.c.C.��'�c,a�J �t�c, .�� -'�_/✓.�^�� i / � T ,G�-� ll -�t' ��E:.t� � r.�,�-�� .ti �- � � `�'�, . a �' � ' �z�f-i�2 c��-,�-�; `,�u1-�;��'-,�� ' /,'- `�fi �.�� I .� �f'�^ � � ,' - '��G��'�� a� `' .9 /r""G�/ I ee s .•• • -� �• •�• / ' ' f �/ - / / / � � i , �� / � , / r � � .� / i / ,..�� _ _ � �� / � / ' _-�� .� i� , , � i �i , i �, 1 ............................................................................... � Please fill out the foilowing demographic information. All responses are anonymous. � � Male (D�� 9e i� Fridley Resident Fridley Business Owne� ;� Female .�� i Length of Residency Visitor � ......................� -�--�---�------------- ------%�-�--�-e --�-�---------�------------ ---�-�--�---�----�--�---�--�-�--- � Prior to the Plan�ing Area Meeting on Septembnrthe,a �� Pnes on the reverse s de, � answer these fou� questions. Foid the survey o tape, and place a stamp in the upper right cor�er and d�op in the mail. Surveys may aiso be dropped off at City Hall or the library. Piease return the survey by September 10,1997. The results w�'ll be discussed at the Planning Area mee�n9• What do you like about Fridiey? .�-� `S U� �ec�.n�' �tuG2 -�-�Z 1 i � � � � What do you disiike about your �eighborhood? , � <t` ,,-, j; <,. ��. � ., ..x � , v�ir►� ..: �i-oss ror�- r - ? 0 uJ�% t� Gtv�, d Y'u r I `%�... K-�S h ,� �a j �- - / . ., � q �7T�-e . �J V1 S�7`�/� � e � c"� ° � j� . : r::�_- �� ;.y-. _ - ---- . C. o n s� e-f' �. w. �� r _ Q�� 1C. i'Y� e � �4 What do you dislike about Fridtey? J -/-` L, d �- � i n�r ��es , `�r �, �� P'!1 /,1 � y 5 i , . ; ! .�.5/t%ec/' �l v `� � �j r� 2 �r n•, r ' i � ,.� � t ' �� . � � � .�- � ..._ �.r� � !. . .-:; . �`Whatdo�y:ou l'tke:�atiout:your neighborhood? �"-�j. -:��` -, R^ 7'�� . a l� j ser'r3.,d.: �s-c.' L/i.1lD . 'l/Li �%e �% �/ (//� O/' .% . �. ,; � . "-' . t'_.cv -..,, � ....""'""..."""""'....""""'..."'"""""""""".. . � _ '.�..k, ""'".... _ ... ""' "... """"'"""""....... _ ..'""' """.......... � : : Please fill out the foilowing demographic information. All responses a�e anonymous. �� Male Female � Age � Fridley Resident y�c�rf �'Length of Residency ----� ..............�---------......------�--.......-------�----�---- Fridiey Bus�ness Owner Visito� ------�---------------------� 0 Prior to #he Planning Area Mee#ing on September 17, 1997, please take the time #o answer these four questions. Foid the survey on the dotted lines on the reverse side, tape, �and place a stamp in the up�r right comer and drop in the mail. Surveys may also be dropped off a# City Hall or the library. Please return the survey by September 10, 1997. The results wili be discx�ssed at the Planning Area meeting. What do you like about Fridley? '� , -- - - � - �� - ��/� , What do you dislike about your � neighborhood? � � �/ 67N-2�_� . ' .}u' iYt : � �.1i.:.i� r. �^� �o� G�� , What do you disiike about Fridle ., , ..�' � l� G�x-�-fi �' „`.r-�J �--�-�cf'. What do: you .�ike:,a�t�out-your neighborho�? .� �� - �, �r�� ...e�r� �.�-��c-�j� �� ` • •':' `.. � l . - _ � ,,.i. <.;: . � _ . (/ . -, . . . . i � Y �. i � � • ,---� _ ._. I �. �.. �� . . . _ . . ' . _ _ _ _ . ' . _ . . .. .... . . _ : ........""".....'"""""""'".. _......"'""'""'"...."""""""'""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".......'"'""'""""'"" . ............."""" : : Please fill out the following demograpt�ic information. A!I responses are anonymous. Male �� Age � Fridley Residenf fridley Business Owner ,: . � � y Female �� r�Length of Residency Visitor Prior to the Planning Area Meeting on September 17, 1997, please take the time to '� answer these four questions. Fold the survey on the dotted lines o� the reverse side, tape, and place a stamp in the upper right corner and drop in the mait. Surveys may also be dropped off at City Hail or the library. Piease return the survey by September 10, 1997. The results wili be disr.ussed at the Planning Area meetin9- Wha# do you like about Fridley? S/ .Q �n i��A ��% A� PL/ i/A� ////Y/ f7/1 �il y/// ...�� / /�� I ( /. : / . 1 f �F `.�'�� _ What do you dislifce about your � "'`eighborhood? . . ,. .t- ... .. .-r �:;. � :::� � .• ... ��.�1 %%D� �%%l%�?i"!/��s�J �O / fi_.: What do you disfike about Fridley? _ , _ ,:. ; Wf�at do;you�Iike abQut�your neighborhood? :� -- tz = rt� .-�! f �<° �j/. ' ��2vi�- - _. . . . ./r� i � , / � , � �i / ts � i ---------------------------------�------------------ - ----------------------------�-�------------ : : Please fili out the following demographic informatio�. All responses are anonymous. ;,,,,,� Mate � Age � Fridley Resident Fridiey Business Owner , ;'� Femate �y� Length of Residency Visitor � ......................�----�---.....--�---.._..---�-�--------� -- ---------------------��--�--.....----------------�------.. d Prior to the Planning Area Meeting on September 17, 1997, please take the time to answer these four questions. Fold the suniey on the dotted lines on the reverse side, tape, and place a stamp in the upper right comer and drop in the mail. Surveys may also be dropped off at City Hal! or the library. Please return t�e survey by September 10,1997. The results will be discussed at the Planr�ing Area meeting. What do you like about Fridley? �. �-Ce� a-u � �-�=t�- �-Ly il_C i �=-7�C. yc r� 3- G1.. G° �o � - /'l_c` � '� U—G� �i�..c_ %t — � '� � ' t'� -• � � . �7 �t -C' S _ - � What do you disiike about Fridley? , �i � �/. C /' l'-i'.. :�.. i !-♦ ' ! . Vuhat do you dislike abou# your � neighbofiood? � � ��. � ' � . �. - . _ _ , � � : What-do.�you;like;about y.our=r:�eighborhood? � a �� . � . ` ,:-- : ,. . � ,_ . ,� � .: - ��-G 7�l? a�'- � c�e r,c.�_ r C.0 �e � � h�- �_ h �--,�a , Lc�. �C �i a ��`�� n •-------------•----------------.._._--------•---�--------•---•-------...-----...__.._...__....----••---.._....._..--------------•-•---•-----•--•--.._....---•------....---... _ Please fill out the following demographic information. All responses are anonymous. �'� Maie ��' o Age �� Fridley Resident �t � Fridley Business Owner � Female t`% ;; :, ., s. Length of Residency n� Visitor ---�------�--------------�----------._._ i-ti, � - r \ '�,, Prior to the Planning'Area Meeting on September 17, 1997, please take the time to %� �nswer these four questions. Fold the survey on the dotted lines on the �everse side, pe, and place a stamp in the upper right comer and drop in the mail. Surveys may a o be dropped off at City Hall or the library. Please retum �e survey by September 1 1997. The results will be discussed a# the Planning Area meeti�g. What do you like aba�t Fridley? ._ 4� L o c. •4- T t o� F, - �� . � �. r_ .� , t t What do you di �eiqhborhood? � � What do you disiike about Fridley? " INS� S5`�1' �iNN; �/�'J��/ �NC�cv ,—��,2 � i !�/�T � rr� �.. .v T � a1�4 ivc-E �- ' � , . G�;<}-r�. H�: �-��..- � F_ /-� n.,�,.c.: c� _' ��1 lac�� `��,�-F{-r�� _ LI �ry c�� F�� r�f-G S� F_ C. e . � � L;ry ��2 , -- �'N�. �TC' t your � - . . . .-:Y�:�_; `„��: = :�What:do you:tike abou.t�rour neighborfiood? �I { ,`.-J - o :.. .�. - nJ 1S IQ� f t � `�' . _ � � I1 +C�/4 T� ! D � d.. J ---•-•----•-••• ••...------•------------------------------------•-•--•----••-----•--�--•-•--•-.....__._..._..----._...-•--•---•-•----------�----._....•••------� Please fill out the following demographic information. All responses are anonymous. ; � Male � � Age ; � Fridley Resident Fridley Business Owne� Female ;�:�� Length of Residency Visitor ---...--� .................-�--.:.----� ----------------------------------------.._........._._.........------�-------�----- � Prior to the Plan�ing Area Meeting on September 17, 1997, please take the�time to answer these four questions_ Foid the survey on the dotted lines on the reverse side, tape, and place a stamp in the upper right comer and drop in the mail. Surveys may also be dropped off at City Hall o� the library. Ptease return the survey by September 10, 1997. The results will be discussed at tt�e Pla�ni�g Area meeting. What do you like about Fridley? � v S c' - /�cI �� ✓Si.t; �- �� '�S �.�.�,� �S Whai do you dislike abouf your � .-�� . neighbofiood? ; � � . , . - �tF:;_'�'. � G N C.� �c� u;�� %�J ~ _ iii o � til�-r� 7�-iiv��7 -; � What do you dislike about Fridle�i? �� L�/'/�'�.�"c—'/..J /r'i �� - T % - �TL-='�/.� �U t %;'�u U...; l� G� r �UUS�" �i_.�U�'.��QN"�r /PC-- �1.�/� L� �/.a/tl•�<-:D U.L' ��.�c-2T% � 'c�.. ✓4,�._e .' iyVha� do.you like about>youc neighborfiood? '�i`�{r'� >t ` �c � � , _ . : �' !';.',A-c-�1� tl� . ��fT.`.�.°�� , ��L. St�c� S'�=��lG-`�.� --------------•------------------------------------�-----------------�------�---------- Please fill out the following demographic information. All responses are anonymous. ; � Male �°3 Age Female u Fridley Resident % � i� Length of Residency Fridley Business Owner Visitor ��----�-----------� ............................��------------------------------------------------------------------------------- � � �.,1 Prior to the Planning Area All�eeting on September 17, 1997, please take the time to answer these four questions. Fold the survey on the dotted lines on the reverse side, tape, and place a stamp in the upper right comer and drop in the maii. Suroeys may also be dropped off at City Hall or the library. Please �eturn the sunrey by September 10, 1997. The resuits will be discussed at the Planning Area �neeting. What do you like about Fridley? CGn t'ra L GL�oGa%o �✓ �"o I q�i �/ opy� �y �'G� �`�.r� � C�OS G �e �—� tvN /o cc� .�f What do you dislike about your neighborh � ? ,,,=o 'f : � � -.. -.��?'�`�v'�'fi'�it..tF�_b� r� ��l''�''��/ ��s�� t 7� _. , / ..' �-�� : . { w' t/ .: �� d r � _.. ��' /��'`'`u-� �Rs� �Pu ,._ . ,� �/ , / �b M G��'�'7"Ol,�/ P�/1eI� a✓O n� �a! a �G�-"� � w�w � . ,, _ �, .. -- . ._ :._..._._._... ...:.. Nr.a � �o . _,s _. e,i�/�v . ��L -. �`7��-w,s� � , , _. �'o �i f�Gai� ��," What do you disiike abou# Fridley? �;�y �'o v��.��= L,��s A,e� -f��e 7�� s� l�' o.v L �. �u,��.,� � �o2r' �c,a.e� s4�1:�' so �o T,� %S �� i4�c O �, G ; �;' /S �o`f'`iiri� /�lo,Ec ?�.�v � �� i : , : �` _ '�."Wtiat�do you�l�ke;aboi�t:your neighborhood? 6:4.i� + '`2�`.E : " '•�'�• ! ' ' ��"^".�-` �.Ql� y `Uo'a L�✓ : °..�-e : �.� �'�' -�-... ��'� .�,� �. --� a �/ ` / �/ V d tt �i �Ii c..�--- it'/oT7�i•�, �s : �,v� �-.v aC ,' Grc i�s � �. .. ._.. ,. . ... . ..... . .. . . . . ; ��-�:: : � �,- �� y �o �ie�7�.�a� �lv.ec �� .l,o-�'�. �� 1'/�lc �,sz C� �'f✓ � ,g-7�� %i �,c- , %�.A�.�-al,c.sc_ : ----------�---------------�---•-•--•----•--------------------...-•-------•--------•---•-------•---•----•--.__..---•-----------------------------.....---•--•--•------•-------�-------------....: . . . _, ��,,. : Please fiil out the foliowing demographic information. All responses are anonymous. � � Male Female Age �Fridley Resident 3 S`�RS Length ofi Residency Fridley Business Owner Visitor --�----�-------------�----------.....---�-----------------------�--------------...-------------- Prior to the Planning Area Meeting on September 17, 1997, please take ttie time to answer these four ques#ions. Fold the sunrey on tfie dotted lines on the reverse side, ^ tape, and place a stamp in the uppe�. right comer and drop in the mail. Surveys may also be dropped aff at City Hall or the library. Piease return the survey by September 10, 1997. The results wiil be discussed at the Planning A�ea meeting. � What do you like about Fridley? t�es relativel_y low ' close to Mpls and StPaul metro areas close to food stores good drinking ��ater police ��atch hocne u-tiile on ��ac. ,— Seems to be well run/managed city numerous familv oriented activities cit�• been vers� responsive �rhen called about propem� u-hich is not kept up � What do you disiike abou# your neighborhood? . . , . . � �'� _J+ close to PO, food stores, shopping center, -`— �i WalMart, Sam's Club, theaters, —� restaurants, health club — many good neig�bors strcets plowed quickly — What do you dislike about Fridley? repi!!?tion for being "blue collar' cil� inadequate apt building parking - forces ; e�cessive on street parking ; � What do you•like ab.out.your neighborhood? ;` ' � ♦ i �•- r- ;�1llS t0 bC gOlIIg (�p�YII]Ij]1---._.. _ • i ;.,' ��e �'�npanple do not keep up their property � on residential streets �� aPa�ents, duplexes not kept up apt driveways not k t in s occ loud musi � �� 9 �{Om cars, apts + C�� ll��s nPpe� off, brpken -_ ' no �� , i � � .: eX�i� � �� speed litqit on residentiai streets �Pa�ent garbage azeas - �,�re when : - `�ewed fro�t the street � ' - .._.��. . � - . .. �.:� --�--------�--------------------------------------------�-------------�------- ---------------------------------------------•---•-----------..._... ; Please fill out the following demographic information. All �espo�ses are anonymous. y �'� 1 /\ Male ��i Age � Fridley Resident . ` f � ^�,',1 ) L( Femaie �'�� teng#h of Residency . ---------�--�-�-------------��-�------.._.....-------...------..._.........------.........._......__. Fridley Business Owner Visitor n n t� Prior to the. Planning Area Meeting on Septembe� 17, 1997, please take the time to �"`� answer these four questions. Foid the sunrey o� the. dotted lines on the reverse side, tape, and place a stamp in the upper right comer and drop in the maii. Sun�eys may also be dropped off at City Hall or the library. Piease return the survey by September 10, 1997. The results will be discussed at the Planning Area meeting. What do you like about Fridley? �V elra�i �.�-� a�-a►. Cl�.da.�n �II�Gi. , . �. . �� u � � i��.. � llfa].t� ' • �.y � � \ _ What do you dislike abou# yo�c. :: , n�eighborhaod? . . ; � . � �S Qyd oroos �: � .. ;;_� .. . 4�'' /) � � ` � 6 I�Yt 2lr��aa !�� t:.� ci'� -Es :� .. 4 �N� Gih2 �OVl1u. � 1 S�t.C.� o� S�id� , .� �s � s�� c�,�. tt� t��raev�.�� . _ _ _..... .. .._._____._._ ._ , _ j. /. �O o� d t$ r +� e � � G� � ��k b�. ��,�� What do you dislike about Fridley? � , t. ��.i� , � � < `: i � � < < . i � � _ • ;. I f � / e �` What do you like about your. neighborhood? . r" - - � . �.��. _ . / - h.� �J� `�ke�`U � �.�,.G �. �� -o �i�-�-�' �—�r�� , � - < • l � .�� --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please fill out the following demographic i�formation. All responses are anonymous. Male � Age i''"\ . � Female � Fridiey Resident Fridley Business Owner � Length of Residency Visitor -----------------------------------��-�---...........-------�---..........------------------------------�----....._._... ------