The URL can be used to link to this page

PL 08/07/2002 - 6988, A CITY OF FRIDLEY AGENDA �PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 7, 2002, 7:30 P.M. � � ------------------------ LOCATION: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER, 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES• July 17, 2002 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of a Lot Split, LS 02-02, by Ted and Kari Ciardelli, to split the parcel onto two separate lots, generally located at 840 Mississippi Street NE. OTHER BUSINESS: 2. Springbrook Nature Center Foundation raised funds for phase one of the Gateway entrance project at Springbrook Nature Center. ADJOURN �A � CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 17, 2002 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Savage called the July 17, 2002, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Members Absent: Others Present: Dean Saba, Barb Johns, LeRoy Oquist, Brad Dunham, Dave Kondrick Larry Kuechle, Diane Savage. Scott Hickok, Community Development Director Darwin Voigt, 6750 Main St., Fridley APPROVE THE APRIL 17. 2002. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES� MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Ms. Johns, to approve the April 17, 2002, Planning Commission meeting minutes as presented. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ^ 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of a Zoning Text Amendment, ZTA #02-01, by the City of Fridley, to repeal and replace sections of Chapters 205.17, 205.18, 205.19, 205.20, and 205.25, relating to outdoor storage in the M1, M2, M3, M4, & S3 Industrial Districts. �"'� MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Johns, to waive the reading and open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED AT 7:32 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated that this ordinance amendment relates to the outdoor storage in the industrial districts. Staff is requesting consideration of changing code requirements related to the number of industrial property owners that are illegally storing goods outdoors. Systematic code enforcement in late 2001 revealed this problem with numerous industrial property owners. Staff determined that the City ordinance should be reviewed. This year's Council Commission survey sought input from the Commissions and the City Council on this issue. Survey results showed that there was no support for drafting new legislation that would allow some outdoor storage subject to screening requirements and obtaining a special use permit. The survey responses were verified at a joint meeting earlier this year on April 15. In developing the proposed ordinance, staff examined several different options based on other cities' regulations on outdoor storage. Mr. Hickok stated that: ■ Blaine has limited outdoor storage allowed with a conditional use permit, the equivalent of our special use permit, limited to a maximum of 50% of the total building footprint and must be fully screened from any public right-of-way with a maximum of 12 feet in height. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 17, 2002 PAGE 2 ■ Brooklyn Park's outdoor storage is allowed through a conditional use permit in the heavy and general commercial districts. Outdoor storage is not allowed in light industrial ^ districts. • Columbia Heights' outdoor storage is allowed as an accessory in the commercial or industrial commercial districts. It must be located in the side or rear yard and screened from adjacent uses or the public right-of-way. ■ Coon Rapids' outdoor storage is allowed in the industrial districts and must be located in the side or rear yard and screened where practical. ■ Inver Grove Heights' outdoor storage is allowed through a conditional use permit and must be screened from residential properties. ■ Mounds View's outdoor storage is allowed through a conditional use permit in its industrial districts and must be screened from the public right-of-way in the light industrial districts. However, there are no requirements for screening in the heavy industrial districts. ■ Osseo allows outdoor storage through a conditional use permit in its industrial district and highway commercial district. It must be fully screened from adjoining properties. ■ Bloomington allows outdoor storage through a conditional use permit and its special limited and special general industrial districts. It is limited to an area not larger than 50% of the ground coverage of the principal building and must be located in the side or rear yard not abutting a public street. Mr. Hickok stated that Fridley's current regulations allow outdoor storage in the M1, M2, M4, and S3 zoning districts through a special use permit process. If the items being stored are incidental to the business, and if the items being stored are not, it has other consequences. Incidental storage means that the storage is temporary in nature. and short term storage is not required as an on-going part of the business. The confusion is that defining temporary and determining � whether or not the item is required as part of the business. It becomes cumbersome and di�cult for inspection by staff. The ordinance proposed would allow up to 50% of the footprint of the principal building. Mr. Oquist asked if the building was split into 5/10 and is 2,000 sq. feet, is each tenant allowed 50% of 2,000? Mr. Hickok stated that at no point could the outdoor storage area exceed the 50% mark of the overall building, and it is really up to the building management to determine if someone gets all of those uses, or if it is broken up equally among the tenants. Mr. Hickok stated that, currently, that is storage of materials equipment, or motor vehicles incidental to the principal operation or use except under the following conditions: 1. Motor vehicle storage is conducted as provided in Section 205.1707. One of the City's least favorite ways to draft an ordinance is to keep sending folks to another direction. 2. Materials, motor vehicles, and equipment are kept in a building or fully screened so as not to be visible from residential district or residential district across form a public right-of-way, and a public park adjacent to the use for public right-of-way adjacent to the use. 3. Materials, motor vehicles, and equipment stored outside do not exceed 15 feet in height and screening materials are provided as in another section. Mr. Hickok stated staff believes there is a cleaner way of doing this, and the amendment proposed integrates this language into a new ordinance format that makes it better for the user and better for staff to interpret and enforce. In the light industrial district, uses permitted with a � special use permit would be adding language saying that limited outdoor storage shall satisfy J the following requirements and other stipulations being necessary due to site conditions: A. Outdoor storage area is limited to a maximum size equal to 50% of the principal building. This area must be designated on the site plan submitted with the special use permit � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 17, 2002 PAGE 3 application and must be located in the side or rear yard with the materials and � equipment kept in the designated outdoor storage area and must be fully screened so not to be visible from a residential district adjacent to the use, a residential district across from the public right-of-way, and public park adjacent to the use, a public right-of-way including railroad right-of-way adjacent to the use or any commercial use adjacent to the use. Screening of the outdoor storage area shall be achieved through a combination of masonary walls, fencing, berming, and landscaping in accordance with. That is sent to another section but is universal to all of the sections so that they can see that there is a uniform standard. The materials and equipment stored outside must not exceed 12 feet in height. Outdoor storage area must be City approved hard surface and bound on the perimeter by concrete, curb, and gutter. The special use permit of limited outdoor storage shall not permit the outdoor storage of semi trucks, semi trailers, or heavy construction equipment. Hazardous chemicals and materials are prohibited for being stored outside, the outdoor storage shall not effect the required amount of parking stalls needed on this site, the location and types of materials to be stored are to be reviewed by the Fire Marshall. Mr. Hickok stated that the language is the same in 205.18. Section 205.19 is regarding the M-3 district. The M-3 district is a little different, because in 1993 when it was created, there were some discussions about the need for outdoor fences in the industrial district. The M-1 and M-2 districts allow outdoor storage that is incidental to the principal use, basically saying that if it is required, you better build a building around it. The M-3 district language required a special use permit if they had incidental outdoor storage. If they had required outdoor storage they could do it by right. That was not the intent of staff and Council, but staff decided it was not exactly as it was meant to be designed or enforced. '� Mr. Hickok stated staff is asking that M-3 require the outdoor storage of materials, motor vehicles, or equipment including the outdoor manipulation of materials and motor vehicles equipment under the following conditions. ■ The materials and equipment must be fully screened so not to be visible from the residential district to the use of the residential district across form a public right-of-way, a public park adjacent to the use, a public right-of-way including railroad right-of-way and any commercial use adjacent to the use. ■ The screening of outdoor storage shall be achieved through a combination of materials and equipment stored outside must not exceed 15 feet in that district. ■ Outdoor storage of motorized vehicles must be on City-approved hard surface, curb, concrete, and gutter. ■ Hazardous chemicals are prohibited for being outside and the location of the types of materials to be stored are to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Marshall. ■ Telecommunications towers and wireless telecommunications facilities are to be still with a special use permit. Mr. Hickok stated Section 205.20, Manufacturing Only, is a district created in 1997 with rapid industrial development. Uses with the special use permit would be allowed limited outdoor storage and that language will look the same. To satisfy the following requirements, 50% of the principal footprint of the building and through a special use permit with all of the screening requirements adjacent to the uses that you have seen. Outside materials and equipment shall not exceed 12 feet and should be on a hard surFace surrounded by concrete, curb, and gutter. The special use permit for outdoor storage shall not permit semi-trucks, semi-trailers, or heavy construction equipment. It will not allow hazardous chemicals or materials and the outdoor storage shall not effect the required amount of parking needed and materials stored outside shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Marshall. Mr. Hickok stated that in 205.25, the S-3, Heavy Industrial District, was an overlay done after the creation of the M-4 district. That district would be allowed to do the outdoor storage with the PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 17, 2002 PAGE 4 language you have seen with no other changes. Staff recommends approval of the proposed changes. The proposed changes wiil allow Fridley to let industries have some outdoor storage � with conditions while not being detrimental to the surrounding properties. This item will go to Council on July 29, 2002. Ms. Johns asked what happens to properties that already have outdoor storage. Mr. Hickok stated that their history will be looked at and whether there was a special use permit. If it has evolved over time with no special grandfathered right, they would need to go through the special use permit process. Mr. Saba asked if there were a lot of properties in violation of this. Mr. Hickok stated that about 40% of businesses are in violation of this. Mr. Dunham asked if the new 50% rule would be enough room for most of them. Mr. Hickok stated there will be some industries that have well over that amount, and it will be a hardship for them to bring back into compliance. Presently, however, the sites do not look good and do not present the image the City would like in the industrial districts. Mr. Oquist stated that some outdoor storage is located across the street from the businesses. How does that apply to the 50%? Mr. Hickok stated that is a good question. There may be possible termination of use there. Unfortunately, that happens with people buying property without investigating the use codes. �.,� Mr. Saba asked how much time they would need to comply. Mr. Hickok stated that six months is a reasonable amount of time for them to come in with their survey and application for the special use permit, plans that will highlight the new curb and gutter asphalt area, and how they could make the site function within the language here. Staff would then give them another six months to actually make the changes. Darwin Voit, 6750 Main Street, stated that he is wondering how this will affect his business and the outside storage of buses. They put in a retaining wall because of the view from the residential area for screening. On the other side is the railroad track. The property on Osbome is screened also. Mr. Hickok stated that the site has buses coming in and out and like an M-1 or M-2 industrial use where trucks come in and out on a daily rotation basis. They sit behind the building for cleaning and re-fueling or service. Staff does not see this as an outdoor storage as much as a typical service use for equipment that is coming in and out of the site. It is more incidental and behind the building in the rear yard with a screening fence. That should have been in an M-3 district due to the height of the buses. The Fridley Bus Company site is in compliance from that perspective and would not need to change. The other site could be within screening requirements also. He would hesitate to give an answer for sure, but staff can take at the properties for further review. Mr. Voit asked if special use permits, once granted. last for as long as you own the property. � Mr. Hickok stated that it generally runs with the land but also is reviewed on a regular basis and can be revoked for misuse. � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 17, 2002 PAGE 5 Mr. Voit stated that used pa�ts (or junk) vehicles are being cleaned up by the City on certain � properties. He continued by stating that these types of eyesores should be put into the ordinance to help clean up some of those sites that store such vehicles. Mr. Oquist stated that on Osborne Road the 12-foot vehicles are not exactly being stored so the 12-foot rule does not necessarily apply. Mr. Hickok stated that it is only items being stored. There is one benefit here that other industries might enjoy also with how the site is laid out. The buses are on the south side of the building and not close to the fence and yard. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED AT 8:02 P.M. Mr. Oquist stated that he is in favor of the proposed changes. This is a good way to pin it down. It is a good idea to consider Mr. Voit's proposed addition of language also. Mr. Hickok stated that it is correct. MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Ms. Johns, to recommend approval of ZTA #02-01. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. '� 2. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 8. 2002. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING: MOTION by Mr. Dunham, seconded by Ms. Johns, to receive the minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 16, 2002, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY & ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING: MOTION by Ms. Johns, seconded by Mr. Dunham, to receive the minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 10 2002 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING: MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Dunham, to receive the minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ^ 5. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 4, 2002 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING: MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Dunham, to receive the minutes. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 17, 2002 PAGE 6 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. �—,, 6. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE MAY 2. 2002. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING: MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Dunham, to receive the minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE JUNE 6. 2002, HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING: MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Dunham, to receive the minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. OTHER BUSINESS: Mr. Hickok stated Stacy Stromberg, Planner, and her husband, Benji, recently had a baby boy, Bailey Stromberg on July 5. The baby had reversed arteries in the heart, but was operated on and now is doing fine. Staff congratulated Stacy and Benji on their new arrival. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Saba, to adjoum the meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE JULY 17, 2002, PLANNING COMMISSION WAS ADJOURNED AT 8:22 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Sign L. John n �. Recording Secretary � �' City of Fridley Land Use Application LS #02-02 August 1, 2002 GENERAI. INFORMATION SPECIAL INFORMATION Applicant: Ted & Kari Ciardelli 118 Craig Way NE Fridley, MN 55432 Requested Action: Lot Split Purpose: To split property into two buildable lots. Existing Zoning: Residential — R-1 Location: 840 Mississippi Street NE Size: 26,065 square feet .6 acres Existing Land Use: Home & Detached Gazage ^ Surrounding Land Use & Zoning: N: Single Family & R-1 E: Single Family & R-1 S: Single Family & R-1 W: Single Family & R-1 Comprehensive Plan Conformance: Consistent with Plan Zoning Ordinance Conformance: Sec. 205.07.01 requires a lot azea of 9,000 sq. ft. for single family lots. Zoning History: Land has had SF home since 1940's Existing Legal Description of Property: Lots 1 thru 5, Block 4, Florence Pazk Council Action / 60 Day Date: 8/26/02 / 9/2/02 Public Utilities: site. �, Water and sewer are available adneaz the Physical Characteristics: Relatively flat, typical suburban landscaping. SUMMARY OF PROJECT Petitioner is requesting to split these 5 existing lots into two parcels exceeding minimum size standards. SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS City Staff recommends approval of the lot split request, with stipulations. • Both lots exceed minimum lot size requirements. • Both lots exceed minimum lot frontage. • Provides additional housing unit for City. View from Van Buren Staff Report Prepared by: Paul Bolin LS #02-02 Analysis Ted and Kari Ciardelli, petitioner's, are seeking to split the property located at 840 Mississippi into 2 buildable lots. Fridley requires that single family lots in the R-1 district be a minimum of 75' in width with a minimum total lot area of 9,000 square feet. The proposed lots will each exceed the minimum standards. Lot "A" will be 115' in width and 15,295 square feet in size and Lot "B" will be 80' in width and 10,680 square feet in size after the split. The petitioners intend to move the detached garage from Lot "B" onto Lot "A" and build a new home on Lot "B". A stipulation is attached to approval of the lot split to ensure the removal of the detached garage in a timely manner. City Code prohibits a garage from being located on a parcel without a principal structure (home). The existing drive from Van Buren also needs to be removed as it is centered on the property lines. Driveways are required to be 3' from any property line. (Photos: Left, Lot "B" lot; Right, Lot "A°.) StafF Recommendation City Staff recommends approval of this lot split request, wifh stipulations. • Lots exceed minimum size requirements. • Does provide an additional homeownership opportunity for Fridley residents. � Stipulations City Staff recommend that the following stipulations be placed upon approval of this request. 1. Petitioner shall obtain all necessary permits prior to construction. 2. Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City's engineering staff prior to the issuance of any building permits, in order fo minimize impacts to the surrounding ^ properties. �"'` 3. Provide proof that any existing we/ls or individual sewage treatment systems /ocated on the site are properly capped or removed. 4. Petitioner to pay required park fees prior to issuance of building permits. 5. Petitioner to pay all water and sewer connection fees. 6. Garage must be removed from Lot "8" by December 1, 2002. 7. Existing bituminous drive from Van Buren must be removed, curb restored, and turf resfored prior to December 1, 2002 !"� _-- - . � � � � CERT I F I CATE OF SU�VEY ►�TM�� dfEASUR6NENTS SHOIIN /N FFtT rINO DEClbGILS OF A FOOTI 4�2 �� '� COIt&y6N FEfG1iTS. 14YV. 55�'II FOR �� a�.��.�.� �6�, �-�� F� �� -�� I F¢NEBY CERTIFY THAT THIS AIRVEY. PLMI OR REPORT 0 3 � DATE Co" }`'��"Z�- e VAS PREPARED BY AfE OR tJf� WY DI RECT SUPERV I S ION M� TI1AT i,UT A pULY LICBJS SURYEYOR UI�DER � °= I RON MO�IU�tErIT �� STA Of NI OTA. SCALE IN FEET � '� " �� Randy L.� h. .L.S. No. 0270 p�p�0�j�;� MINOR SJQ��IyiS1�4� Russell J. Kur . L.L.S. No. I6i13 -QRCPp,lZLO Ju�.�l b � LooL M..\ SS lSS I�� I S�" � � c� � ��.,� � , � o N � �.� r c. _ —�- . _...._ . _.. I � a� a F.��.t,�� y�� ,,� 133�50 Q 30b1� i I 1 � � � tq � _ J � om , d � �, �. ; 20 (� �s u ' '--°_--... � 15,�{oo�.FT• P �; t r N.` ta��° v I z5�--- ' L` 9i � � � .,•ri i �,oc►.t� ., � . 5 ,�; g �,g---- , � �, � _ _ _ _... .._ �- � Z� p d � ��-, �,.� � 4�PNi��- � w A � �o Qi' ' ` r aa � � � . . .. a_�_.�_�._-- / —' --+� --- � � � ��A . 1o�b4�SQ.RT. �Q J 2� ' ( >I S � «, , '� a 49 �'I�S-S-r '� 16 � � 1].� � �i ' r� - ••----+ - ��u� o..a�Y3,- � a r w .�� O �P �9 d � �' .-�._._.._. 9 � N V' � . �, � U` � Ra°�T �(q2o `" S IP � W oeD'FEtJ py�LIN(, 25 - - i 33 ,5 a- x -�----h---i �'i C G}\fa.N L\NK FG�'NC.E � lo ►� � �� ay r� � (� � � � If � � IJ � � � � ~�( 7 EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIP'PION � Lars 1 thru 5, Block 4, Flor�ce Park, Anoka Co�mty, Mimesota, together with 1/2 vacated alley adjacent ther�o. PROPOSED TRACT A Lots 1 thm 3, Block 4, Flor�ce Park, Anoka County, Mini+esata, tog�har with 1/2 vacated ailey adjac�u ther�o. �� PROPOSED TRACT B Lots 4 and 5, Black 4, Florenca Park, Moka Coutrty, Minn�ota, tog�her with 12 vacated alley adjacent thereto. � CITY OF FRIDLEY '"'�31 UNIVERSITY AVENUE rrtiDLEY, MN 55432 '�, (763) 572-3592 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FOR: Plat � Lot Split PROPERTY INFORMATION: (site plan required for submittai, see attached) Address: S�I O MiSSi SSi pni Sf-- NE Property Identification Number. Legal Description: Lot /� 3 S Block TractlAddition o %.lL( I�. T.' L....� i..SI� . //.� uwi...L_ i lJLI1L .nl�i..�- .G��..sL, Current Zoning: -Kcs-� Reason for Subdivision Square i . J�ve you operated a business in a city which required a business license?;_ ,� �'�F s No � If Yes, which City? --� �- _ If Yes, what type of business? — - Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No /r/Y/r/V ti�V�YtiA�/�VArtiI�Yr�Yr/Ur�/1V�VA/M/Ytiwn�VMM�/�VIV �Vti/r/Y,►I��V �V�ViVNA1MiV�IVti�V�Y/Y/�I/�/�YM,Y�V �V�YIA/1VAI�ViVN/V/VM�/iVwrti/V /VIY/V/Y FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) _ (Contract purchasers: Fee oyyners must sign this fo��rr� prior to processmg ) � ^ ' r�f_Ic NAME: `-�he r.�e. -� • t:+ouirt��l� - eu�d �44a�ir�=- �4: Ge�; - ADDRESS: t t S C� ' w - _ _ � - - - �� DAYTIME PHONE: 1to3 - 12- 1�' SIGNATURE/DAT • „�- �: _ . ,. _, _ :..,, _<, . _ _ ,. _ .. ._. _ - _ -. : , , � _ - -�- NAME: 'Tft� a,k,�l �.ar ADDRESS: ll �6 Cxau�a c DAYTIME PHONE: '163 - 5' = 2,3ZO SIGNATURE/DATE; I �� U _- _...�._��.....�......_.,....��..�.,�.�._�......�.�,�.�...��,....,��.�..,......��.�,��.�.�.� FEES Plat: $500.00 for 20 Lots, $15.00 for each additional lot Total Fee: Lot Split: $250.00 ./�� •� Receipt #: Og� Received By: �plication Number: ��S �I` b�-'G�- :�eduled Planning Commission Date: o?OD� Scheduled City Council Date: - - 10 Day Application Complete Noti cation Date: Gb -- 60 Dav Date: S�t�r„ �v,� �, � nn -i _ _ __ _ _ �. �, �� ; : . CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO: All property owners/residents within 350 feet of property generally located at 840 Mississippi Street NE. CASE NUMBER: Lot S lit, LS 02-02 APPLICANT: Ted and Kari Ciardelli Petitioner or re resentative must attend the Plannin Commission meetin . PURPOSE: To split the parcel into two separate lots. LOCATION OF 840 Mississippi Street NE. PROPERTYAND LEGAL Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. & Block 4, Florence Park, Lots 1-5 together DESCR/PTION: with'/Z vacated alley adjacent thereto. DATE AND TIME OF Planning Commission Meeting: HEAR/NG: Wednesday, August 7, 2002, at 7:30 p.m. The Planning Commission Meetings are televised live the night of the meeting on Channel 17. PLACE OF Fridley Municipal Center, City Council Chambers HEAR/NG: 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN HOW TO 1. You may attend hearings and testify. PARTICIPATE: 2. You may send a letter before the hearing to Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator, at 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 or FAX at 763-571-1287. SPEC/AL Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an ACCOMODATIONS: Interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 763-572-3500 no later than August 1, 2002. The TDD # is 763-572-3534. ANY QUESTIONS: Contact Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator, at 763-572-3599. Publish: July 25, 2002 August 1, 2002 �� , � 0 I r �: O I � •V V � `. . �.: , �.. �` N � � v � y � � � � � � � � a � � ' Zw z O -� F- I w � C� W i � W y � W � 2 � � � U � a �z�o-w-i"�w � ��FW., V � ai3Uf7v�i�� JI ' I �' W W I ! I � ��, I i'� �� N N � � � � � m y m ,� i� I �� y s� � __r �_. a..a ��- _ �� 'r � G � 3 ° 3 fV O a N � 11 � �N E a � 47 5 � �' m � � O 0 � N l�q i� o � �, c l0 T � m � ? I N O C I a� ,� o I ; �c , $� I 1 m � i T � 'I �� C > I y O .. `�- � i �� I c c$ ; 10 i a� a v� mt -- �' � ,� o� c�o m yE m� N� O N C E� '�E .`o 3c �� at vi : �� m� v� �c a �m �� m �� 8 �° N � 'r �O 4f � lC G1 t M � _ Ql C � � ah N W .'rJ � T � � � � 'O O O� a� c� om '� c o� w c CURRENT RESIDENT 0 FRIDLEY, MN CURRENT RESIDENT 6405 VAN BUREN ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CARLSON RICHARD l& LEORA J 6400 VAN BUREN ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 THUREEN RONALD D 840 66TH AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 860 66TH AVE FRIDI.EY, MN 55432 DIGEROS DENNIS G 8� KAREN A 870 66TH AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 6524 JACKSON ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 871 MISSISSIPPI ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FULTON MARTY L 851 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CLAUSEN LAURICE A 6405 VAN BUREN ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 6401 JACKSON ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 850 66TH AVE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 AUSLUND STANLEY & BETTY 860 66TH AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 6520 JACKSON ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 6520 ABLE ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 GILLETTE ROY J& KIMBERLY A 871 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 841 MISSISSIPPI ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 840 66TH AVE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 6400 VAN BUREN ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 DOUGHERTY JOSEPH W 8 NANCY 6401 JACKSON ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 QUINN MICHAEL J 8� LEANN L 850 66TH AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 870 66TH AVE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 SCRIMSHAW RONALD R 6520 JACKSON ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 REDDEN DONNA A 6520 ABLE ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 851 MISSISSIPPI ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 ZEGLAND RICHARD L& MARIE J 841 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT GRAVELLE JEROME B& DOROTHY SCHOLL KATHRYN GRACE 831 MISSISSIPPI ST 831 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 6524 JACKSON ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 / �1 /�, CURRENT RESIDENT WALLIN DARRIN & HARMONIE CURRENT RESIDENT 821 MISSISSIPPI ST 821 MISSISSIPPI ST NE 811 MISSISSIPPI ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 � BIRR JEFFREY L 8 BETH A 811 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 763 MISSISSIPP) ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 SWANSON DENNIS & CATHLEEN 751 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 DEAREY SHAWN L 8� LORANG LYNN M 881 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDIEY, MN 55432 �� CURRENT RESIDENT 870 MISSISSIPPI ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 KELLEY DARLINE A M 840 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 BLAKE MARK A 8 DEBRA K 810 66TH AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 792 MISSISSIPPI ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 775 MISSISSIPPI ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 SMOLICH DENNIS J 8� CAROL A 763 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 810 66TH AVE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 890 MISSISSIPPI ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CHRISTENSEN JOY ANN 870 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 820 MISSISSIPPI ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 810 MISSISSIPPI ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 WHITE MARTIN A 8� IMELDA M 792 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 BAKER STEPHEN P& HELEN M 775 MISSISSIPPI ST IVE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 751 MISSISSIPPI ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 881 MISSISSIPPI ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 BYRNTESON JAYNE M 890 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55421 CURRENT RESIDENT 840 MISSISSIPPI ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 POLKEY JEROME JOHN & ALICE 820 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 DESLAURIERS ANN B 810 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 776 MISSISSIPPI ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 N�1�S PATRICIA M CURRENT RESIDENT OLOUGHLIN PATRICK J JR 7, .SSISSIPPI ST NE 772 MISSISSIPPI ST 772 MISSISSIPPI ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 6471 VAN BUREN ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 6464 ABLE ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 MOLUS MAX J 8 IRENE R 6456 JACKSON ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 6458 ABLE ST FRIOLEY, MN 55432 BELISLE ROGER J 8 LORI A 6451 VAN BUREN ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 WISNIEWSKI PATRICK H& J S 6452 VAN BUREN ST NE FRID�EY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 6431 JACKSON ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 SMITH TRENT D 8� GEIER NANCY 785 BENNETT DR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 830 66TH AVE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 WELCH EDNA 6471 VAN BUREN ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 KNOWLES DEAN A& MARGARET A 6464 ABLE ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 6435 JACKSON ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 SARVELA KAREN A 6458 ABLE ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FERGUSON WINNIFRED 8 DALE E 820 66TH AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 6452 ABLE ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 PICOTT MICHAEL J 8 LYNN M 6431 JACKSON ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 773 BENNETT DR FRIDIEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 761 BENNETT DR FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 820 66TH AVE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 6456 JACKSON ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 HARGREAVES PATRICIA J 6435 JACKSON ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 6451 VAN BUREN ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 6452 VAN BUREN ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 BOYCE MAE A 6452 ABLE ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 785 BENNETT DR FRIDLEY, MN 55432 GONZALEZ VICENTE 8 SHERYL L 773 BENNETT DR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 HAWERSON LEA P& MARILYN J 761 BENNETT DR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT LOOMIS MERLE B 8 EVELYN O CURRENT RESIDENT 6425 VAN BUREN ST 6425 VAN BUREN ST NE 6442 VAN BUREN ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 i� �1 i� ANDERSON BRIAN J& CAROLINE A CURRENT RESIDENT WERNER TIMOTHY & CATHERINE 6442 VAN BUREN ST NE 6424 ABLE ST 6424 ABLE ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 FRIDLEY, MN 55432 r��\ CURRENT RESIDENT 6415 JACKSON ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 6415 VAN BUREN ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 MCGUIRE LAURA L 6414 VAN BUREN ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 6411 JACKSON ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CHRISTOPHERSON GREG A& D L 774 BENNETT DR NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 �"'�, COPPESS DONALD L 8� PHYLLIS I 6415 JACKSON ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 NEGRI JAMES ALFIN 6415 VAN BUREN ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 6410 ABLE ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 WEISS LORRAYNE W 6411 JACKSON ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 SCHMOLL THOMAS E& SHERI L 830 66TH AVE NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 6414 VAN BUREN ST FRIDLEY, MN 55432 WEGLEITNER NORBERT M& V M 6410 ABLE ST NE FRIDLEY, MN 55432 CURRENT RESIDENT 774 BENNETT DR FRIDLEY, MN 55432 PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the Fridley Planning Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Wedaesday, August 7, 2002, at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of a Lot Split, LS #02-02, by Ted and Kari Ciardelli, to split the parcel into two separate lots, legally described as Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5& Block 4, Florence Park, Lots 1-5 together with � vacated alley adjacent thereto, generally located at 840 Mississippi Street NE. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. Any questions related to this item may be referred to Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator at 763-572-3599. 0 � Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids ^ should contact Roberta Collins at 763-572-3500 no later than August 1, 2002. The TDD number is 763-572-3534. DIANE SAVAGE CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION Publish: July 25, 2002 August 1, 2002 �"''\ r _ _ CiTYOF FRiDLEY ERIDLEY ��IUNIC[PAL CENTER • 6�i31 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY. �Iti 55-i32 •(763) 571-3-150 • FAX (763) �71-1287 July 15, 2002 Ted & Kari Ciardeili 118 Craig Way NE Fridley,�MN 55432 Dear Ciardelli's: Per Minnesota Statute 15.99, local govemment units are required to notify land use applicants within 10 days if their land use applications are complete. Based on the City's application schedule, we officially received an application for a lot split on July 8, 2002. This letter serves to infoRn you that your application is complete. �'"`� Your lot split application hearing and discussion will take place at the City of Fridley Planning Commission Meeting on August 7, 2002 at 7:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers at 6431 University Avenue. Action on your Iot split will be taken by the City of Fridley City Council at 7:30 P.M. on August 26, 2002. You will need to attend both meetings. ' If you have any questions regarding this letter or the process, please feel free to contact me at 572-3599. Sincerel , a,,••-� Paul Bolin Planning Coordinator PB C-02-91 � �, Springbrook Nature Center Memo To: Planning Commission Members From: Siah St. Clair Date: August 2, 2002 Subject: Planning Commission meeting The president of the Springbrook Nature Center Foundation, Malcolm Mitchell, and I will be attending the Planning Commission meeting on Wednesday the 7�'. At its June 3`d meeting the Pazks and Recreation Commission passed a motion supporting the Foundation's request to move forward with fund raising efforts for the Gateway entrance project at Springbrook Nature Center. Those minutes aze on the Planning commission's agenda for approval next Wednesday. We will be present at the meeting to provide information and answer questions about the Gateway Project. � �"� cirr oF FRi��r PARKS � RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING — JUNE 3, 2002 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Kondrick called the June 3, 2002 Parks 8� Recreation Commission Meeting to order at 7:38 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Dave Kondrick, Marcy Sibell, Tim Solberg, Dick Young Others Present: Jack Kirk, Director of Recreation & Natural Resources Dave Lindquist, Park Maintenance Supervisor APPROVAL OF APRIL 8, 2002 PARKS � RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES MOTION by Mr. Young, seconded by Mr. Solberg to approve the minutes of the April � 8, 2002 meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. APPROVAL OF PARKS � RECREATION COMMISSION AGENDA FOR June 3. 2002 MOTION by Mr. Young, seconded by Ms. Sibell, to approve the agenda for the June 3, 2002 ��eeting. . UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. ' 1. STAFF REPORT . a. Program Update . . - � : Mr. Kirk called attention to the written program update in the _Commission member's packets _s ,. that contained .brief write-ups :on some _of :the activity dyring-#he past montk� including: the ;-_,:, renting of the garden plots, the Senior Dances, the Senior Volunteer Recognfion, the Senior ;` . Golf League, Bird Banding, Summer Staffing, and the Earth Savers Cluti. " b. Park Maintenance Report . . . Mr. Lindquist stated that during the month of May they mowed all the park areas . weekty, = cleaned buildings, picked up trash, prepared bali fields, swept courts and trails, remodeled the � Little League concession building and replaced fencing on some of the ball field areas. � Mr. Lindquist further stated that they have hired a new full-time parks maintenance worker vvho will begin work on June 10�'. He has some very good experience and should be a nice addition to our work force. There were over 300 applicants for the position. . � Parks and Recreation Commission Meetina - June 3, 2002 � Paae a2� -; b / � c. Fridley `49e� Days Mr. Kirk provided a schedule of the upcoming `49er Days' events and invited the Commission members to participate in the many activities that week. d. Springbrook Donation from Micro Co�trol Co. Mr. Kirk stated tfiat the Nature Center Foundation was given a check for $5000 from Micro Control Company to be used for equipment needed at the Nature Center. This same company gave the Nature Center a$10,000 donation for equipment last year. e. Council / Commission Survey Results and Meefing with the City Council Mr. Kirk stated that he has provided the Commission members with a copy of the results of the Council / Commission survey for 2002. The City Council met with two of the Parks and Recreation Commission members on May 6�' to discuss several of the issues facing the park and recreation system. Mr. Kondrick and Mr. Young represented the Commission in this discussion with the Council. Mr. Young stated that he thought the mee�ng went very well and was an opportunity for the City Council to hear the opinions of the Commission on these issues. He stated that there was a very good exchange of ideas with the Council. Mr. Kondrick agrees that the meeting with the City Council was a very good. one. _He felt that the council listened to the concerns and opinions of the Parks and Recreation Commission. � 3. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Springbrook Nature Center Foundation Request For Support Of Gateway Entrance _ Project - . ' _ - Mr. Kirk stated that the Springbrook Nature Center Foundation has presented plans for �� improvements at the Nature Center �and is asking the City of Fridley to supporf this project �_ The Foundation woufd like the City to approve the concept of the'Gateway Eritrance Pro�e�t y�� plan and secondly, permit the Foundation �` to proceed with the detailed planning and �� commencement of fundraising for Vision Package #1. , -_ Mr. Kirk further stated that the Commission has been given a five-point process that outlines ,�-`�` �how the Foundation would like to work with the City of Fridley on this Springbrook Gateway: ":_� � Project. The points of this process are as follows: A. The Springbrook Nature Center Foundation will provide the leadership �' required to move each project element to completion. B. Working with the City, the Foundation will provide the capital expenses necessary to accomplish each element. No aspect of any element would b� initiated unless the capital funds have been secured , _��-. � r ��: :�� B Parks and Recreation Commission Meeti�ct — June 3, 2002 Pa4e 3� C. The Foundation wiil have a business plan that will reconcile and meet any ,--� increased operating costs that are a result of elements in this project. This business plan will be submitted to City Council / staff for. approval before work on any element of the project is initiated. D. The Foundation will. satisfy requirements made by the City Council regarding future depreciation expenses prior to initiating construction of project elements. E. The Foundation will prepare a phased Development Plan detailing sources of revenue by � category in a time frame appropriate to the phased implementation of project elements. Mr. Kondrick stated that the Foundation has met with the City Council, as well as the Parks and Recreation Commission to explain the plans for this project. The Foundation is very confident that this is a good plan and they are confident in securing the needed funding. Mr. Kondrick stated that he thought the City Council would endorse the project if it is phased and the SNC Foundation will raise all of the funding necessary. He further stated that when we look at the Parks Capital Improvement program and the needs throughout our park system, it is clear that we don't have the dollars available to fund a project of this magnitude. The Springbrook Nature Center Foundation seems very dedicated to this project and very eamest in their desire to make this successful. Ms. Sibell asked what the total cost would be for the first phase of the project. Mr. Kirk stated that the estimated cost for Vision Package #1 was $800,000 to $900,000 including the architectural fees. Mr. Solberg asked if it was the understanding of the Commission that the Foundation would have all the dollars in hand for each phase of the project before starting the actual work. Mr. Kondrick stated that this was his understanding. He further stated that he didn't believe � that phase 1 would have a big effect on the City's operating costs at Springbrook. There may �;-- be some minor costs associated with it, but nothing too significant. " Mr. Solberg stated that he would like it clarified that the Foundation would do all of the �`�' fundraising for this entire project and provide any additional operating costs associated with `'' the project that is over and above what the City currently funds at Springbrook Nature Center. '' Mr. Kondrick stated yes, that was what the Foundation planned to do. � Mr. Solberg asked who would have ownership of the facilities that were being added io the _ site? Mr. Kirk stated that this is a City of Fridley park and the City would own all of the facilities. ,--� Ms. Sibell asked what would happen if the Foundation starts raising money and only Paises half of the dollars needed for the first phase? Is there an expectation that the City will cover the remaining dollars? ,� Parks and Recreation Commission Meetin� — June 3. 2002 � Paqe 4 � d . Mr. Young stated that each phase of the project has several components and in most cases, these components could be done independently. If only a portion of the fundraising goal w� realized, then only a portion of the project would be completed. These individual componen. would still be an improvement at Springbrook, even if the entire project could not be completed. � Ms. Sibell stated that she would like to see a review process with regard to the promotional materials and presentations that will be made to potential contributors. She would like to make sure that the City is okay with what is being promoted for this project. Mr. Young stated that he would like to see the Foundation be allowed to proceed with the fundraising for phase 1 of the Gateway Entrance Project. He further stated that he has a problem with some elements of the future plans for the building at this point, but the components in phase 1 would be very good for Springbrook. Mr. Kondrick stated that he agreed with Mr. Young and would like to see the Foundation be allowed to move forward with fundraising for phase 1. We can show the Foundation that we are interested in the project and backing them in their fundraising effort. We do not need to say that we support all 4 phases at this point, but we do support phase 1. Ms. Sibelf asked what would happen to this project if for some reason the Foundation were to have a drastic change in current membership or charter mission. Mr. Kondrick stated that the City would have the money in escrow before any part of the project is started. � MOTION by Mr. Young, seconded by Ms. Sibell to support the Springbrook Nature Center Foundation's Gateway Entrance Project with the following recommendations: • The Parks and Recreation Commission endorses the idea of improvements being made to the Springbrook Nature Center. � • The Commission is supporting Vision Package #1 of the Gateway Plan as outlined and presented at the April 8, 2002 Commission Meeting. • This support for the project is offered with the understanding that the project will be done without City dollars for capital expenditures or additional operating/maintenance --__�__ costs. - - � - --- • The Commission requests that the City review and approve presenta�on and �-:_ promotional materials for the phased improvements at Springbrook Nature Center. ` • The Commission recommends that the City of Fridley give approval for ihe fundraisingy :° to commence for Vision Package #1. • The Commission .recommends that at the completion of fundraising for phase �1, a-=-; detailed presentation of the plan for phase 2 be presented to the City before any fundraising for that phase commences. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. �� J �' Parks and Recreation Commission Meetins� — June 3. Z002 Paqe 5 � ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Mr. Young, seconded by Ms. Sibell to adjoum the June 3, 2002 meeting at 8:50 p.m. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE JUNE 3, 2002 MEETING ADJOURNED. � / � 0 :::a;:. �:, - �: .. . rc i ... �,e:. -. .