Loading...
PL 07/06/2005 - 30879^ CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 6, 2005 i"� CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Kondrick called the meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Members present: Members absent: Others present: Barbara Johns Larry Kuechle David Kondrick Dean Saba Diane Savage Leroy Oquist Brad Dunham Julie Jones, Planning Coordinator Rebecca Brazys, Recording Secretary APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — June 15, 2005 MOTION by Commissioner Saba, seconded by Commissioner Kuechle to approve the minutes of the June 15�' meeting as presented. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Consideration of a Special Use Permit SP #05-02 by Amtech Lighting for Holiday Companies to allow a changeable electronic sign per Section 214.07 of the City Code, generally located at 200 57th Av. NE. MOTION by Commissioner Kuechle, seconded by Commissioner Johns, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:34 PM. Ms. Jones stated the petitioner would like to erect an automatic changeable sign for the gasoline pricing portion of an existing free standing sign at the Holiday Store at 220 57th ^ Av. NE. For clarification, this application is for only this location, not all the Holiday stores in Fridley. The sign will be an LED type sign. This property is zoned C3, CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 6, 2005 Page 2 of 12 �,\ General Shopping, so the commercial sign code applies. This station store was built in 1999 which is also the year they obtained a permit for the existing free standing sign. The petitioner states that this type of LED sign is the new industry standard for gas pricing. She reviewed a photo of the existing sign and explained the center portion will be changed to an LED gas pricing sign. In stafPs analysis, Ms. Jones stated they have noted that an automatic changeable sign is permitted in the sign code with a special use permit. There is a requirement that the sign message cannot change more often than every 45 seconds. The existing sign is 77.5 square feet in size which complies with the sign ordinance and it also meets the requirement that it can't be any closer than 50 feet to a residential district. Staff recommends approval of SP #05-02 as it meets the requirements of the sign code. Staff also recommends the following stipulations be attached: 1) Petitioner shall obtain sign permit and current sign erector license prior to installing any signage on site. 2) Message on LED section of sign cannot change more often than once every 45 seconds. 3) Message on LED section of sign can never flash or have motion that may distract vehicular traffic in area. Chairperson Kondrick asked if the message on the sign can be changed from gas pricing to other promotions. �-� Scott Meister, Amtech Lighting representing Holiday Companies, responded the only change on the new sign would be the actual gas pricing with no other messages possible. Commissioner Johns asked if Mr. Meister has any objections to the stipulations. Mr. Meister responded he does not. MOTION by Commissioner Saba, seconded by Commissioner Johns, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:41 PM. MOTION by Commissioner Saba, seconded by Commissioner Kuechle, to recommend approval of SP #05-02 with the stipulations recommended by staff. 1) Petitioner shall obtain sign permit and current sign erector license prior to installing any signage on site. Z) Message on LED section of sign cannot change more often than once every 45 seconds. 3) Message on LED section of sign can never flash or have motion that may distract � vehicular traffic in area. CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 6, 2005 Page 3 of 12 � UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. Consideration of a Master Plan Amendment, MP #05-01, by Yale Place Associates, LLC, to increase the number of surface parking spaces and permit the construction of a raised parking structure, generally located at 6499 University Avenue NE. MOTION by Commissioner Kuechle, seconded by Commissioner Johns, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:43 PM. Ms. Jones stated the petitioner is requesting an amendment to its master plan to allow for smaller, yet a greater number of parking spaces as well as a parking deck expansion. Yale Place is proposing to buy the building next to City Hall, the former Target Operations Center. The Target Operations Center properly, City Hall and the finro medical buildings to the south are all part of a tax increment district which is why a master plan was established for the entire area when it was originally developed. This amendment would allow a smaller dimension but greater number of parking stalls ranging from 8.5 to 9.5 feet in width rather than the 10 foot width required by code. The ,�--� second part of their request is to be permitted to build a parking deck on this site this fall. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority will review this proposed amendment at their July 7th meeting. The reason for the various sizes is that the stalls closest to the building will be the largest due to the anticipated greater turn-over of those stalls throughout the day. Those stalls to be used by the employees, further away from the building, will be 8.5 feet wide. The accessible stalls will not be reduced in size as dictated by code. The narrow stall widths would allow for an additional 47 at-grade parking stalls. In addition they're hoping to build a parking deck. There are finro different proposed plans, but they're looking for approval on the largest of the finro proposals. The final determination will depend upon the user of the building. One of the proposed plans shows 104 additional stalls and the other shows 148 additional stalls. The master plan amendment will show the largest option in case a new tenant warrants the larger number of parking stalls. Ms. Jones stated staff recommends approval of the request with the following stipulations: 1) Petitioner shall obtain all necessary building permits prior to construction. 2) The proposed parking structure additions shall be architecturally compatible with the existing building and finished with complementary building materials (as shown in petitioner's plan entitled Parking Structure Elevation — South). 3) Parking stalls to be reduced to 9.5 feet, 9.0 feet, and 8.5 feet in width respectively , shall be striped as identified in proposed plan and remain ^ striped as such unless further modifications are made to the Master Plan after appropriate Commission / Council action has been taken. CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 6, 2005 Page 4 of 12 �, 4) No off-site parking will be permitted during construction of parking deck. All necessary precautions and logistics planning must be done to assure public safety and to assure demands will not be placed on adjacent parking facilities or streets as a result of the parking deck construction. � Ms. Jones reviewed pictures of the property in question and the proposed lay-out and explained there will be 34 - 9.5 foot wide parking stalls, 8 accessible parking stalls, 9 foot wide stalls along Mississippi and the remainder will be 8.5 feet wide. Chairperson Kondrick questioned the difference in the finro different parking ramp proposals. Ms. Jones stated one will contain 104 parking stalls and the other will have 148 stalls. Commissioner Saba was concerned that the Planning Commission may be setting a precedent for parking stall width if this request is approved. Ms. Jones responded that this proposal is a little different than a variance request typically submitted because it is a part of a master plan for the whole area. She believed it would be difficult to argue that this would set a precedent for someone coming in requesting a typical variance request. The projects with master plans are always unique since the project is being reviewed as a whole. Commissioner Saba explained he's concerned because the City has been very strict in the past about issuing any kind of exception as the Appeals Commission has also been. Ms. Jones explained there has been smaller width parking stalls approved, such as the employee parking area for Medtronic. Commissioner Kuechle asked if this would remain with the property and if there is a tenant for the building requesting this much parking. He was concerned about "giving something away we may not have to give away." Ms. Jones stated it is her understanding that the master plan stays with the property even if the property is sold. The petitioner has indicated they do have a possible lease agreement with a tenant for a portion of the building which is why they have submitted two different proposals. The final determination will depend upon what tenant or tenants they end up with. They're in a difficult situation in that they feel they need the additional parking to attract a tenant. The parking on site now was designed in a customary fashion for Target and the way they used the building. Commissioner Kuechle questioned the width of the drive aisle. Ms. Jones offered to investigate this and respond. ,� Commissioner Johns asked if there's any way a retail use would go into this space. CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 6, 2005 Page 5 of 12 �� Ms. Jones stated it is her understanding that only an office use would be allowed on this site. Chairperson Kondrick asked if there should be an additional stipulation that if a retail use does go into this site, the parking stalls should be of an adequate size. Ms. Jones stated the issue of permitted uses should have already been addressed in the master plan. Commissioner Johns questioned if there will be any green space added since some will be lost with the construction of the parking ramp. Ms. Jones responded that to her knowledge there are no landscaping plans for this location and any removed trees will not be replaced. Commissioner Saba questioned how many parking spaces would be required if this were a normal business office location. Ms. Jones stated she would have to investigate that issue, but the Target operation did not meet the parking stall requirements from the beginning. Chairperson Kondrick questioned who will dictate the need for the ramp, the petitioner �, or the City. Ms. Jones stated the petitioner is initiating the request for additional parking; the City is not requiring specific parking because we do not know who the tenant will be at this point. The petitioner believes they need the additional parking to get a tenant into the building. Commissioner Johns questioned if all the stalls were 9.5 feet wide and there was only the single surface, could the petitioner meet the parking requirements and she questioned if the parking requirement is based on the square footage of the building. Commissioner Kuechle commented they probably could, but another factor is the number of employees on this site. Commissioner Saba questioned if the impact of traffic on Mississippi has been considered by staff. Ms. Jones responded that she is not aware of any traffic concerns since it is a right in right out only access onto Mississippi. When Target was using this site, most of the people used the 5�' Street access rather than Mississippi. Commissioner Kondrick commented that traffic leaving the site at quitting time could ,� be a concern on Mississippi and he believed staff should take a look at this. CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 6, 2005 Page 6 of 12 �, Mark McCary, president of Yale Place Associates (petitioner), stated he is aware of and has no objections to the stipulations recommended by staff. Commissioner Kuechle asked if the petitioner has had experience with the 8.5 foot wide parking spaces. That is something the City doesn't normally have. Mr. McCary responded as they have worked with parking lot consultants and looked at the Metro wide community by community approach to parking widths, the standard now is about an 8.5' parking stall. In municipalities where there is an extremely high demand for parking, parking spaces actually get smaller. It's quite unusual to see 10 foot parking stall widths - even in retail areas in the Metro. The building on this property has been for sale for over four years and over that time there have been a number of potential users, but they could not get beyond a preliminary analysis of the site because, he believed, the principal �deal killer" has been the fact that the property is under-parked by any measure of parking standards for conventional office use. This is a very solid and well built office building, but nobody who would value this type of a building design can make sense out of committing to it because of the under-parking situation. A building with a 25,000 foot floor plate, and there's three of them, appeals to large multi-floor users typically larger corporations that specifically need larger floor areas; they pack in the work environments and that drives the parking requirements to new levels. Fridley's current code for parking is four per thousand which would equal about 300 parking stalls required. At a 10 foot width, the current parking allows about �, 240 which is well below what would be required. What they want to do is refurbish this site and fix the parking problem so they can attract the kind of users described with a building they believe will be competitively unique. The market is very sophisticated when it comes to leasing or buying space and it is the rare deal that doesn't mandate the number of parking spaces required in a lease from a company renting space in a building. In other words, he could not lease the building to a company that needs 400 parking spaces and deliver only 230, nor would they enter into a lease without stipulating there be sufficient parking. If they don't have to build a parking ramp, single story structure, they would prefer not to. There's a 10 to 15% chance that simply by approving the reduction in stall width on grade they could find a full building user for which the 320 parking stalls would be adequate. Conceivably that fit could exist, but based on the building's inherent design, its power capacity and its heating and cooling capacity which are all attractive to high density users, his instinct and experience tells him that more often than not they would be looking at users who need five or six parking stalls per thousand square feet. Also, because of the restriction of no off-road parking and the fact that a tenant typically wants to move into a building within 90 to 120 days, the parking structure must be ready. Commissioner Kuechle asked if the petitioner is the current owner of the building. Mr. McCary responded that Yale Place Associates is under contract to purchase the building. They have a binding contract with Target with contingencies, one of which is �--� solving the parking problem. He pointed out that in the HRA agreement, they have the right to build as much parking structure as they want without any additional approvals. CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 6, 2005 Page 7 of 12 � From what he can tell reading the document, there's no limitation on the number of levels the parking structure can have. So, he didn't believe they're asking for anything more than they already have the right to do and, in fact, they're trying to clean it up a little. As far as the aisle width, Mr. McCary stated it is the standard width. MOTION by Commissioner Kuechle, seconded by Commissioner Saba, to close the public hearing. UPON A UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:20 PM. Commissioner Kuechle stated he is not concemed about the proposed ramp, but was concerned about the 8.5 foot wide parking spaces. Commissioner Saba also expressed concern about the narrower parking spaces and the possibility of setting a precedent, but he believed this was something the Council could address. MOTION by Commissioner Johns, seconded by Commissioner Kuechle, to recommend approval of MP #05-01 with the stipulations as stated. 1) Petitioner shall obtain all necessary building permits prior to construction. � 2) The proposed parking structure additions shall be architecturally compatible with the existing building and finished with complementary building materials (as shown in petitioner's plan entitled Parking Structure Elevation — South). 3) Parking stalls to be reduced to 9.5 feet, 9.0 feet, and 8.5 feet in width respectively , shall be striped as identified in proposed plan and remain striped as such unless further modifications are made to the Master Plan after appropriate Commission / Council action has been taken. 4) No off-site parking will be permitted during construction of parking deck. All necessary precautions and logistics planning must be done to assure public safety and to assure demands will not be placed on adjacent parking facilities or streets as a result of the parking deck construction. UPON A UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. 3. Consideration of a preliminary plat, PS #05-05, by United Defense, L.P. to replat their property at 4800 East River Road NE. MOTION by Commissioner Saba, seconded by Commissioner Kuechle, to open the public hearing. UPON A UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE ^ PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:22 PM. CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 6, 2005 Page 8 of 12 n Ms. Jones explained that the petitioner, United Defense, was recently acquired by a company called BAE Systems. The subject property is zoned M2, Heavy Industrial and no change is proposed in the zoning. This site is surrounded by M2 zoning to the north, south and east and park land to the west. The properly has been developed since 1940 and has had various owners and alterations. There is one access point on the north side on 51St Way, and finro East River Road access points. The United States Navy used to own the northern portion of the property and the southern part of this site is sealed as a contaminated Superfund site area and its part of their goal to keep that as a separate parcel. The petitioner wants to clarify through this plat any future liability related to past ownership boundaries because of some of the history on the site. They want to make sure they keep the boundaries set according to who used to own certain sections of the property. She reviewed the existing lot lines befinreen Lots 1 and 2 run through an existing building. State building code does not permit zero lot lines through a building like this without clear separation befinreen the buildings. This plat will continue what is deemed a legal non-conforming status of the building. These two lots into the future cannot be sold separately unless the building connections were closed off to meet the code. Ms. Jones further explained that the petitioner has requested to be exempt from the park dedication fees typically associated with a plat. Staff and the City Attorney have determined that in this case the fees should be waived because United Defense sold at a discounted price property for park land to Anoka County. The City Code allows �, donation of land in lieu of the park dedication fee, so the petitioner has met that requirement. However, the waiving of the fee will be handled by the City Council so the Planning Commission does not have to address that issue. Ms. Jones stated staff recommends approval of this plat with the following stipulations: 1) Petitioner may not sell Lot 1 or Lot 2 independently without meeting all of the requirements of the State Building Code. 2) Petitioner cannot geographically expand the legal nonconforming use building complex on Lots 1 and 2 without requiring that remaining building be modified to comply with all elements of the State Building Code. (Ms. Jones added for clari�cation that this stipulation was typed incorrectly in the packet. She a/so clarified that BAE Systems is allowed to do work inside the building but cannot expand the footprint of the building without meeting all the building code requirements.) Commissioner Kuechle questioned if the petitioner will be the owner of all three lots. He also questioned the narrow strip of land associated with Lot 2 that runs along the perimeter of Lot 1 and which requires access across Lot 2 to reach Lot 1. Ms. Jones responded the petitioner does own all three lots. As to the question regarding access to Lot 1, Ms. Jones explained that code requires 25 feet of road ^ frontage which Lot 1 does have as well as an access point on 51 %2 Way. CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 6, 2005 Page 9 of 12 � Chairperson Kondrick stated the concern would be if Lot 2 were sold, how that would impact access to Lot 1, but his understanding of Ms. Jones' presentation is that the lots cannot be sold separately. Jeff VanKeuren, Public Affairs Manager for BAE Systems (the petitioner), explained that they wish to keep the property lines the way they were when the Navy owned the property for reasons of identifying if contamination were found in the former Nary property in the future. It would be significantly easier to address such an issue with the Navy if the properiy lines remain the same. As far as the park dedication fees, United Defense has provided significant support to make improvements to the park land they sold to Anoka County in 1982 at a considerable discount, greater than $1 million than any estimate. They have also made significant contributions to the Anoka County park system every year for at least the last eight years that he's been involved. They put in $5,000 to $10,000 each year which Anoka County parks matches. In the last five years alone, they have contributed in excess of $40,000. They have set a goal for continued improvement of the park. Consequently they do not believe they should be subject to the park dedication fee. Mr. VanKeuren stated they do have reservations regarding the second stipulation as they have not had ample time to study it. They want to understand more completely the wording and have not had time to study it from the perspective of a future owner of the property. They'll have to look at the stipulation more carefully. �"� Ms. Jones explained that it is her understanding the way the property exists today with the lot line dividing the building, the building is currently legal nonconforming with the state building code. So this stipulation simply reiterates the existing condition and limits what can be done to the existing footprint of the building. Mr. VanKeuren stated he understands the stipulation and thanked Ms. Jones for her assistance, but they still need time to evaluate it. Chairperson Kondrick commented that the petitioner will have the opportunity to review the stipulation prior to the City Council meeting and action on this matter. MOTION by Commissioner Saba, seconded by Commissioner Johns, to close the public hearing. UPON A UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DELCARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:40 PM. Chairperson Kondrick stated he is chairman of the Parks and Recreation Commission for the City and is aware of the petitioner's past performance and dedication to the county park system. Even though the City typically does not waive park dedication fees, in this case, the petitioner's past performance warrants the waiving. � CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 6, 2005 Page 10 of 12 �, MOTION by Commissioner Saba, seconded by Commissioner Kuechle, to recommend approval of preliminary plat PS #05-05 with the two stipulations presented and corrected by staff. UPON A UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. 4. Consideration of a preliminary plat, PS #05-06, by the City of Fridley to correct right-of-way boundaries for street reconstruction, legally described as Lots 8, 9, and 10, Block 1, Oak Creek Addition, generally located at Glen Creek Road and Logan Parkway. MOTION by Commissioner Kuechle, seconded by Commissioner Johns, to open the public hearing. UPON A UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:43 PM. Ms. Jones stated the replat of right-of-way and residential lots is being requested to create an orderly public record and to allow for future land swaps. The City of Fridley seeks to replat the properties located at 151 Glen Creek Road and the City-owned lot � directly south of Glen Creek Road for the purpose of defining right-of-way and excess property ownership. The registered land survey plat was prompted by City street reconstruction work in the area. Glen Creek Road does not have sufficient right-of-way in certain areas to construct the proposed typical street section. As part of the 2005 street reconstruction project in this neighborhood, curb and gutter are being installed on Glen Creek Road and the road is being slightly widened. Because of the street construction project, the City is cleaning up improper lot lines. The current right-of-way map does not match the existing location of the road. This plat will not impact access to any of the adjoining private properties. Ms. Jones then reviewed the sizes of the tracts involved as follows: Tract A-180 square feet or .004 acres; Tract B 24,372 square feet or .0560 acres; Tract C 4,665 square feet or .107 acres and Tract D 3,961 square feet or .091 acres. Tract D is the tract that is intended to be traded as excess right-of-way. Part of Tract C already exists as right-of-way. Tracts A and C become part of the widened right-of-way. In a later action, the City expects to trade excess right-of-way with adjacent property owners for right-of-way that is needed for the widening of the service road. Adjacent property owners are supportive of the land swap proposed. She stated staff recommends approval of this plat as an orderly public record will be created. Staff does not recommend any stipulations as this land is already under City control. MOTION by Commissioner Saba, seconded by Commissioner Kuechle, to close the public hearing. ^ UPON A UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:46 PM. CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 6, 2005 Page 11 of 12 �. MOTION by Commissioner Kuechle, seconded by Commissioner Saba to recommend approval of PS #05-07. UPON A UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. 5. Consideration of a preliminary plat, PS #0507, by the City of Fridley, to correct right-of-way boundaries for street reconstruction, legally described as Lots 12, 13 and 36, Block 12, Spring Brook Park, generally located at Ely Street and Liberty Street. MOTION by Commissioner Johns, seconded by Commissioner Kuechle, to open the public hearing. UPON A UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:47 PM. Ms. Jones explained that the City is seeking to replat the right-of-way and industrial lots to create an orderly public record and to allow for future land swaps. Replatting the properties will better define right-of-way boundaries. The registered land survey plat is being prompted by City street reconstruction work in the area. As part of the 2005 ,� street reconstruction project, curb and gutter are being installed on the service drive between Ely Street and Liberty Street. In addition, the service drive is being slightly widened. In a later action, the City expects to trade excess right-of-way with adjacent property owners for right-of-way that is needed for the widening of the service road. Adjacent property owners are supportive of the land swap proposed. It will allow owners to expand property square footage and, as a result, the owners may be able to expand the building square footage in the way they wanted. The City proposes no changes to the existing building. The current zoning is M1 and no changes are proposed to the current zoning. The plat will not impact access to either of the adjoining private properties. Tract A and C are the finro tracts that are intended to be traded as excess right-of-way. Sizes of the proposed tracts after the replat will be as follows: Tract A(facing Ely Street)1,173 square feet or 0.027 acres; Tract B(facing Ely Street) 5,778 square feet or .133 acres; Tract C(facing Liberty Street) 3,386 square feet or .078 acres; Tract D(facing Liberty Street) 6,539 square feet or .150 acres. Staff recommends approval of this plat request as an orderly public record will be created. Staff does not recommend any stipulations as this land is already under City control. She stated one letter was received from a property owner in the area, M.J. Fluten, but believed the writer seems confused about the issue. MOTION by Commissioner Saba, seconded by Commissioner Johns, to enter the correspondence from M.J. Fluten into the record. ,� UPON A UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 6, 2005 Page 12 of 12 �'� MOTION by Commissioner Saba, seconded by Commissioner Johns to close the public hearing. UPON A UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:53 PM. MOTION by Commissioner Saba, seconded by Commissioner Johns, to recommend approval of PS #05-07 as presented. UPON A UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. 6. Receive the minutes of the June 8, 2005 Appeals Commission meeting. MOTION by Commissioner Kuechle, seconded by Commissioner Saba, to accept the minutes as presented. UPON A UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. ADJ_ ,� MOTION by Commissioner Saba, seconded by Commissioner Johns, to adjourn. UPON A UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:55 PM. Respectfully submitted by, � �� � , " �' Rebecca Brazys Recording Secretary �,. . Q o a ,� � Name CITY OF FRIDLEY SIGN-IN SHEET PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING � �l�- , �a�� Address/Business �� �� �E c� � � ��4� �ys��►� �A�rr C�I � s�`rr�. n4� -r �� �-, G�J i✓Cr- b �� � ��� �� ��� . eI � � S�c l�, � l� �,