Loading...
PL 10/20/2010 - 29959PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING October 20, 2010 Chairperson Kondrick called the Planning Commission Meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Leroy Oquist, Jack Velin, David Kondrick, and Dean Saba MEMBERS ABSENT: Marcy Sibel, Brad Sielaff, and Brad Dunham OTHERS PRESENT: Stacy Stromberg, Planner Scott Hickok, Community Development Director Michael Schifsky, Ashland Inc. Kevin Kennedy, Speedway Super America Chris Clos, A-ABCO Auto Parts Approval of Minutes: September 15, 2010 MOTION by Commissioner Saba to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Commissioner Oquist. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Consideration of a public hearing for a rezoning, ZOA #10-02, by Ashland Inc., to rezone the properties at 7315 Highway 65, 7299 Highway 65, and the vacant lot south of 7299 Highway 65 from M-1, Light Industrial to C-2. 2. Consideration of a resolution for a Vacation, SAV 10-03, by Ashland Inc., to allow the vacation of a portion of 73"d and one-half Avenue, north of 7315 Highway 65. MOTION by Commissioner Oquist to open the public hearings. Seconded by Commissioner Velin. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARINGS WERE OPENED AT 7:04 P.M. Stacy Stromberg, Planner, stated Michael Schifsky, who is representing Ashland Inc., is requesting to rezone the property at 7315 Highway 65 from M-1, Light Industrial to G2, General Business to allow the redevelopment of this site with a retail user. Ms. Stromberg stated staff determined that in order to avoid spot zoning and create a contiguous commercial zoning district in this area the properties to the south should also be rezoned. These properties are 7299 Highway 65, which is currently a SuperAmerica gas station and the vacant parcel to the south of SuperAmerica, which is addressed 7201 Highway 65. These two parcels should also be rezoned from M-1, Light Industrial to G2, General Business. The gas station use most closely fits in a commercial zoning district. The City has notified the owners of the SuperAmerica, who are also the owners of the vacant lot south, that their properties are involved in this rezoning process. Ms. Stromberg stated the petitioner is also seeking to vacate a portion of 73 '/2 Avenue, just north of 7315 Highway 65 to provide additional land area for the redevelopment of the subject property. Ms. Stromberg stated the property at 7315 Highway 65 is zoned M-1, Light Industrial and is located in the northeast corner of Highway 65 and 73rd Avenue. In 1987 a special use permit was issued to allow an automobile service station and as a result, the site was developed in 1987 with the construction of the existing 1,261 square foot building, which at that time was a Rapid Oil Change. In order for the building to be constructed several variances needed to be granted. A variance was granted to reduce the minimum allowable lot area from .75 aces to .54 acres, a variance was granted to reduce the side yard setback on the street side of a corner lot from 35 feet to 19 feet on the east and from 35 feet to 28 feet on the west, and from 35 feet to 21 feet on the north. Ms. Stromberg stated variances were also granted to reduce the distance that the edge of the curb opening may be from a street right-of-way intersection from 75 feet to 26 feet on the north and from 75 feet to 55 feet on the southeast, and to reduce the parking and hard surface setback from a street right-of- way from 20 feet to 12 feet on the east and from 20 feet to 10 feet on the west. There was also a restrictive covenants placed on the property that restricted development on this site to that of a quick oil change and lubrication service facility ("Use"). Any future re-use of the structure for uses other than that comparable to said "Use" will be subject to City Council approval. Considering this lot has street frontage on all four sides, it was not easy to fit this smaller user on such an undersized industrial lot without several of variances being granted. Ms. Stromberg stated the SuperAmerica property at 7299 Highway 65 is also zoned M-1, Light Industrial and is located in the southeast corner of 73rd Avenue and Highway 65. When the service station was constructed in 1983, several land use requests were also approved by the City Council. A lot split was granted to subdivide one large lot and create two small lots, which are now, 7201 and 7299 Highway 65, which in turn allowed for the construction of the Service Road. A special use permit was also approved to allow the construction of the motor vehicle fuel service station, and two variances were approved to reduce the lot size requirements and the parking lot setback requirement from an abutting right-of-way. Ms. Stromberg stated the vacant lot at 7201 Highway 65 has never been developed. Ms. Stromberg stated the petitioner is seeking to rezone their property at 7315 Highway 65 NE from M- 1, Light Industrial to G2, General Business. Since the property went on the market in 2007, there has been interest from several retail type users, however because of the current industrial zoning; none of inquiries chose to purchase the site. Over the years, City staff has had several discussions with the property owner about a potential rezoning of the subject property, the SuperAmerica property and vacant lot at 7201 Highway 65. Due to the small lot size of the subject properties, the high visibility, and the ready access to the properties, the petitioner feels that a commercial zoning is the best fit for the subject properties. Ms. Stromberg stated there are several of these turn-back type parcels within the City, which are those lots along major corridors; that have roadway all around them. All of the other turn-back parcels within the City are zoned some type of commercial with the exception of the subject property, and the SuperAmerica property. The small lot sizes of these parcels tend to require a commercial zoning and there tends to be more interest from commercial uses to be located along major city corridors. Therefore, a rezoning of these properties is consistent with the trends already seen along the major corridors of Highway 65 and University Avenue within Fridley. 2 Ms. Stromberg stated in 2004, the properties at 7101 and 7151 Highway 65 were rezoned from M-1, Light Industrial to G2, General Business to allow the current uses within the buildings to conform to code requirements. Most of the uses with the buildings at those two properties are either of a retail or office nature; as a result, it made better sense for them to be zoned commercial rather than industrial. Ms. Stromberg stated in 1992 the City Council approved a rezoning from industrial to commercial that was request by Ed Stanke, for his property, which is located at 7091 Highway 65. At that time he requested a rezoning to better match the existing uses in his building, which were an insurance and marketing office and a diet center. Ms. Stromberg stated in 1989, the City Council approved a rezoning for 7191 Highway 65 from M-1, Light Industrial and R-3, General Multiple Units, to G2, General Business. Currently, this is where Chopper City Sports is located. Ms. Stromberg stated over the last 21 years, the City has seen a progression of rezonings along this corridor from Industrial to Commercial, mainly related to the types of users that tend to occupy space along Highway 65. The proposed rezoning is an extension of that trend. Therefore, rezoning these properties would be consistent with the neighboring properties. The small lot size of the subject properties also tends to necessitate a commercial zoning. The M-1 zoning requires a minimum lot size of 1.5 acres for new plats, while the G2 zoning requires a minimum of 20,000 square feet. None of the subject properties meet the current M-1 lot size minimum, however they will meet the minimum lot size for a commercial zoning. Ms. Stromberg stated the City's zoning ordinance and official zoning map are the mechanisms that help the City achieve the vision laid out in the Comprehensive Plan. The law gives the City the authority to "rezone" property from one designated use to another, so long as the zoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan's 2030 future land use map designates this area as "Redevelopment." This will allow for the potential redevelopment of the Valvoline property and will also allow for the development of the vacant parcel at 7201 Highway 65 with a retail/office user. Ms. Stromberg stated as noted above, when the property at 7315 Highway 65 was developed, several variances were granted to meet setback requirements. It would be beneficial for those variances with the exception of the lot size variance to be transferred and applied to the new G2 zoning designation. Though the City code allows a much smaller lot size in our commercial zoning districts, the setback distance requirements remain essentially the same. The only setback variance that may be eliminated is a north side yard setback requirement, as a result the vacation request. If that vacation is approved, that variance will no longer been needed. Staff would recommend that the Planning Commission note this motion for the variances if the rezoning is approved. Ms. Stromberg stated Super America currently has a Special Use Permit to allow a motor vehicle service station, which is required in the M-1 zoning district, as well as the G2 zoning district. It would be beneficial to include, as part of this rezoning request, the transfer of the SUP on this property from the M- 1 zoning to the G2 zoning, to keep this property in conformance. Staff would recommend that again, the Planning Commission note this in the motion, if the rezoning is approved. This property also received variances to allow for the construction of the gas station. The variance for lot size will be eliminated; however the variance for parking setback will need to apply to the G2 zoning and should be noted. Ms. Stromberg stated the petitioner is also seeking to vacate a portion of 73 '/2 Avenue north of the Valvoline site at 7315 Highway 65. When the site was originally developed in 1987, there were several discussions about vacating 73 '/2 Avenue to provide additional land area for the Valvoline site, which could be used to rearrange the driveway into the lot and for screening purposes. At that time there were also discussions about extending the Service Road north to connect it with the portion of the Service Road by Fireside Drive. The vacation of 73 '/2 Avenue did not occur because the extension of the Service Road north of 73 '/2 Avenue would have required a roadway easement from the mobile home park on Onondaga Street and the owners at the time weren't willing to grant the easements. As a result, staff did not proceed with the vacation of 73 '/2 Avenue. It was stipulated in the 1987 variance, though, that at which time 73 '/2 Avenue was vacated the petitioner (Rapid Oil Change) would be required to landscape and irrigate the area. Ms. Stromberg stated the potential buyer for the subject property is a specialty clothing supplier, whose focus is primarily in industrial grade work, western, biker, and law enforcement footwear and apparel. As part of their business, they have two trucks that are used as class and product showrooms. The vehicles travel to regional work places to serve as a showroom for potential clients. When not on a job site, the trucks will be parked on the subject property. While on site, they will be backed up to the north side of the building and will be accessible from within the store to serve as further showroom space and to store goods. Vacating 73 '/2 Avenue north of the property will provide the potential user the additional space needed to park the trucks as well as provide the visual screening required by City code from the public right-of-way. Ms. Stromberg stated in order to determine if vacating this portion of 73 '/2 Avenue would be an acceptable solution for the City to consider, staff contacted all the properties owners who own land along 73 '/2 Avenue between Highway 65 and Central Avenue and our Engineering Department conducted traffic counts over a period of three days. Ms. Stromberg stated we have heard from four of the seven properties owners. Three of them stated that they didn't have a problem with the vacation and expected that the Minnesota Department of Transportation would at some point in the future further restrict this access anyway. Mr. Schrader, the owner of the property at 1155 73 '/2 Avenue, which is Carefree Self Storage, called to state that they would be opposed to the vacation. He also submitted a letter, which is attached for your review. The main reason he is opposed is because he feels it limits their access and visibility from Highway 65 NE. They also wanted to make sure that the Service Road from 73rd Avenue to 73 '/2 Avenue was a perpetual easement for right-of-way, so it couldn't be vacated. The Service Road is a perpetual easement for right- of-way purposes, so it will not be vacated. Ms. Stromberg stated it is very typical that right-of-way counts are done over a three day period. The overall counts for the three-day time period going westbound (turning right on Highway 65) on 73 '/2 Avenue is 291 vehicles. The counts going eastbound on 73 '/2 Avenue are 129 vehicles. Staff also did counts on the Service Road, east of the Valvoline property and those numbers were 214 vehicles going southbound and 178 vehicles going northbound. Ms. Stromberg stated these traffic counts for a three-day time period appear very low for an industrial street. Planning staff is awaiting comments from the Engineering staff on the counts. Staff will share that analysis during the pubic hearing. Ms. Stromberg stated vacating the street will provide the business at 7315 Highway 65 the additional land area needed for future redevelopment. It will also provide a nice landscaped buffer between Highway 65 and the commercial/industrial businesses to the east. Ms. Stromberg stated it is inevitable that the Minnesota Department of Transportation will eventually limit this access to Highway 65 and as a result, the City is trying to be proactive by considering the elimination of this access now, when there is an opportunity to redevelop the property at 7315 Highway 65. 0 Ms. Stromberg stated continuing the Service Road north to connect to the Service Drive near Fireside Drive may be something that the City may look into in the future if the need presents itself, but isn't part of the proposed request. Ms. Stromberg stated City Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request for 7315 Highway 65 NE, with the recognition of the following variances: 7315 Highway 65 — All variances originally granted under VAR #87-24 ■ To reduce the side yard setback on the street side of a corner lot from 35 feet to 19 feet on the east and from 35 feet to 28 feet on the west and from 35 feet to 21 feet on the north. ■ To reduce the distance that the edge of the curb opening may be from a street right-of-way intersection from 75 feet to 19 feet on the north and 75 feet to 55 feet on the southeast. ■ To reduce the parking and hard surface setback from a street right-of-way from 20 feet to 19 feet on the east and from 20 feet to 10 feet on the west. Ms. Stromberg stated City staff recommends approval of the rezoning request for 7299 Highway 65 NE, with the recognition of the following special use permit and variance: 7299 Highway 65 — Original special use permit granted under SP #83-09. Variance also originally granted in 1983. ■ Special Use Permit to allow the construction of a service station. ■ Variance to reduce the parking and hard surface setback from a street right-of-way from 20 ft. to 11 ft. Ms. Stromberg stated City staff recommends approval of the rezoning of the vacant parcel, generally located at 7201 Highway 65 NE. Ms. Stromberg stated City staff recommends approval of the street vacation request. Ms. Stromberg stated if the street vacation is approved, City staff recommends the following stipulations should be attached. L Curb, gutter, and asphalt shall be removed in accordance with the City's Engineering department standards within one year of approval of the vacation request. Removal shall take place between the eastern line that defines the edge of the eastern disabled vehicle lane of Highway 65 and the new curb radius along east Service Drive and forming the new terminus of 73 '/2 Avenue NE. 2. New curb and gutter shall be installed along with fill, irrigation, and sod in accordance with a plan to be approved by City staff, in conjunction with the project described in stipulation # 1. 3. Vacated right-of-way shall be landscaped, including a berm; a plan shall be submitted and approved by City staff within 18 months of approval of the vacation request. 4. The petitioner shall obtain a right-of-way permit from the Minnesota Department of Transportation for work done within the right-of-way. Commissioner Velin stated 73 '/2 is a street now. Is staff stating the curbing and gutter would be removed now? Ms. Stromberg replied, it will be removed and replaced with grass and landscaping. Michael Schifsky, real estate manager with Ashland Inc., stated they are as a company not in the habit of closing stores down unless it dictates the market simply will not support the operation. Six years ago they reviewed their stores and closed 45 down, including 4 in Minnesota and this is one of them. With the zoning issue eliminated even mildly interested parties and a few nationally-known parties who have expressed interest in this site would have required them to come to this point. With the time frame they could not really describe. He began discussions with Mr. Hickok about the site being rezoned incorrectly. He felt this site had retail appeal. The SuperAmerica property was also zoned similarly, and he was informed that spot zoning would not be allowed. They concluded that all the lots involved would be rezoned and vacated subject as a secondary element. It certainly made sense. What it does is it increases the square footage of the lot and it brings it to a level that allows better circulation, more parking and opens it up to the appeal to a number of users. As a result a retailer user has come forward and expressed an interest in the property. It fills the demographics for the product they carry. Chairperson Kondrick asked Mr. Schifsky's if he had any problems with the stipulations? Mr. Schifsky asked whether the work to be performed would be done by the buyer or the seller and is there a timeframe? Scott Hickok, Community Developer Director, stated some of those details may need to be worked out between the buyer and the current owner. Staff has put reasonable timelines on this with the understanding that it might be this buyer or another buyer. They are set out so they have a year from the approval of the vacation to make the change. He imagines that might become part of that document of the sale of the property with the buyer that is going to do that. Within 18 months of that approval, there should be a landscape plan submitted and installed and then the petitioner obtain a right-of-way permit when that work is being done. All of it was structured in a way that it anticipates that the petitioner might have that as part of their negotiation with the buyer, and that buyer would have some time to put it in if the sale happened right away. Mr. Schifsky stated he has no problem with them. He believed they can arrive at some agreement with the buyer. They are motivated to make it work. Chairperson Kondrick asked Mr. Schifsky's if he felt the timeline seemed reasonable? Mr. Schifsky asked is it correct that it is one year to 18 months? Ms. Stromberg replied, yes. Mr. Schifsky replied, yes. Commissioner Oquist asked whether the buyer plans on remodeling and using the existing building? Mr. Schifsky replied, they plan on using the building in its primary structure and at one point modifying a portion of it. The way those buildings were made back in 1987 are very conducive to other uses. Commissioner Oquist asked, they do not remove the building and start over? Mr. Schifsky replied, no. Chairperson Kondrick asked whether they should be concerned about hazardous waste on the site? Mr. Schifsky replied, there is no indication of UST's or any environmental concerns on the site. The sale of the property will require a Phase I. The financial tool they need will require Phase I and if there is an issue, a Phase II will be required. � Commissioner Oquist asked Ms. Stromberg whether the service road on the east side remains? Ms. Stromberg replied, yes. Christopher Clos, A-ABCO Auto Parts, stated the concerns he has are not so much that they are closing down the access to Highway 65. He understands the reasons. However, in their situation they are being told they have to move their fence in. He is wondering why can't they maybe close the east side, too, and put a cul de sac by the neighbor's building. Mr. Hickok replied, the question did come in earlier this week from another member of A-ABCO. Staff had not anticipated that as an outcome of this and is now just being looked at. He can say staff had a few internal discussions on it but no real conclusions at this point. The cul de sac certainly is an interesting concept and potentially could serve the users that still have access to that roadway and want to get out to 73rd. It was a lot to bite off and be able to answer at the time the question came in. Several years ago staff was talking to A-ABCO and his neighbor to the south about taking that road out and just wondering what their thoughts would be at that time. Staff was actually looking at a redevelopment in that area at that time. It has been discussed before but that concept really had to do with basically taking out all of 73 '/2 but for maybe that short stretch in there. They kind of gave up on that idea after they decided that those businesses not only wanted to stay there but were doing very well in serving the community. It is something staff can continue to analyze. He does not know if they will be able to come to a conclusion now that the process has started and they are under a 60-day timeframe. Staff will probably have to look at it, analyze it, and take it on as a second vacation piece of this if that is the direction they wanted to go. Mr. Clos stated the main reason for the vacation is the screening. They would be able to screen in the industrial side, screening it from some of the traffic. The petitioner may put in bushes or trees? How is that really screening? A-ABCO is being made to screen while Valvoline comes in and gets to expand. It just does not seem to make a lot of sense. Mr. Hickok replied, although it may seem that way the City has he thinks had the good fortune of having a rezoning request and a user that is interested in this site and the City simultaneous to that interest has an interest in solving this inevitable question about what happens when the State comes in and cuts off 73 '/2 anyways. If they do that later, then we have a developer that is in there, they already made their provisions for their site without the vacated roadway. Staff thinks it makes perfect sense to take on the inevitable now to vacate it and, though it may seem it is for Valvoline, it is in the City's best interest also to do that because what they want to do ultimately end up with is a good-looking end cap for this block of industries and businesses along here; and we think it can get the best results by doing it right now while somebody is looking at redoing this site anyways and doing some work on this site. It will happen then and it will be in the interest of that business that wants to come in. It will be in the interest of the City that right now it has this postage-stamp sized site and a right-of-way just north of it that eventually will go away. The City is thinking there is no better time than right now to have that go away. Yes, it really does benefit Valvoline but any vacation benefits to adjacent properties, and that is only part of the purpose here. Really they have a petitioner who is anxious to do something with that site. Mr. Hickok stated regarding the other part of Mr. Clos' question, would shrubs really screen what they are talking about, the City's public works department has expressed concern about putting trees over what eventually needs to be an easement. As part of this before it gets to Council, there will be an easement document that the City needs to maintain to get at those utilities. It will be difficult with tree roots on top of utilities and their preference is not to have those. They do not mind a berm at all. It could be a landscape berm with rolling turf and shrubs on it. 7 Mr. Clos asked whether there is any time frame and if the City knows for sure if the State will be closing 73 '/2? Mr. Hickok replied, there is an educated assumption that is being made right now. Highway 65 counts keep going up. In the County's 2030 comprehensive plan it shows intense traffic increases along this corridor. The State has talked about improvements on Highway 65 going all the way to 694. The City does know they are not going to wait until 2030 or 2020 to make changes. He can tell them they are going to be doing a planning process and looking for anything that is not at least a quarter of a mile spacing in terms of intersections and will be taking it out. That is a standard practice and should come sooner or later depending on funding for improvement of Highway 65. Kevin Kennedy, District Manager of Speedway/SuperAmerica, stated they have no problem with this. MOTION by Commissioner Saba to close the public hearing. Seconded by Commissioner Oquist. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARINGS WERE CLOSED AT 7:48 P.M. Chairperson Kondrick stated he thinks it is a good plan. It does affect a lot of property owners but most of the people seem like they are okay with it and understand it better now and who knows what the State is going to do. He has no problem with it. Commissioner Oquist stated he does not have a problem with it either. He thinks it is pretty straightforward. It does make sense. Commissioner Velin stated he is fine with it. MOTION by Commissioner Saba approving the rezoning, ZOA # 10-02, by Ashland Inc., to rezone the properties at 7315 Highway 65, 7299 Highway 65, and the vacant lot south of 7299 Highway 65 (addressed 7201 Hwy 65) from M-1, Light Industrial to C-2. Approval of rezoning 7315 Highway 65 NE, with the recognition of the following variances: 7315 Highway 65 — All variances originally granted under VAR #87-24 ■ To reduce the side yard setback on the street side of a corner lot from 35 feet to 19 feet on the east and from 35 feet to 28 feet on the west and from 35 feet to 21 feet on the north. ■ To reduce the distance that the edge of the curb opening may be from a street right-of-way intersection from 75 feet to 19 feet on the north and 75 feet to 55 feet on the southeast. ■ To reduce the parking and hard surface setback from a street right-of-way from 20 feet to 19 feet on the east and from 20 feet to 10 feet on the west. Approval of rezoning 7299 Highway 65 NE, with the recognition of the following special use permit and variance: 7299 Highway 65 — Original special use permit granted under SP #83-09. Variance also originally granted in 1983. ■ Special Use Permit to allow the construction of a service station. ■ Variance to reduce the parking and hard surface setback from a street right-of-way from 20 ft. to 11 ft. Seconded by Commissioner Oquist. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION by Commissioner Saba approving vacation , SAV # 10-03 by Ashland, Inc., to allow the vacation of a portion of 73'/2 Avenue, north of 7315 Hwy 65 with the following stipulations: L Curb, gutter, and asphalt shall be removed in accordance with the City's Engineering department standards within one year of approval of the vacation request. Removal shall take place between the eastern line that defines the edge of the eastern disabled vehicle lane of Highway 65 and the new curb radius along east Service Drive and forming the new terminus of 73 '/2 Avenue NE. 2. New curb and gutter shall be installed along with fill, irrigation, and sod in accordance with a plan to be approved by City staff, in conjunction with the project described in stipulation # 1. 3. Vacated right-of-way shall be landscaped, including a berm; a plan shall be submitted and approved by City staff within 18 months of approval of the vacation request. 4. The petitioner shall obtain a right-of-way permit from the Minnesota Department of Transportation for work done within the right-of-way. Seconded by Commissioner Oquist. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. Receive the Minutes of the September 9, 2010, Housing and Redevelopment Authority Commission Meeting. MOTION by Commissioner Oquist to receive the Minutes. Seconded by Commissioner Velin. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. Receive the Minutes of the July 13, 2010, Environmental Quality and Energy Commission Meeting. MOTION by Commissioner Velin to receive the Minutes. Seconded by Commissioner Oquist. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. Receive the Minutes of the August 2, 2010, Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting. MOTION by Commissioner Oquist to receive the Minutes. Seconded by Commissioner Saba. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. OTHER BUSINESS: 6. Consideration of approval for 2011 Planning Commission meeting dates. MOTION by Commissioner Velin approving the dates. Seconded by Commissioner Saba. � UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Stromberg stated the next meeting is November 17, 2010. ADJOURN MOTION by Commissioner Saba adjourning the meeting. Seconded by Commissioner Oquist. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:50 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Denise M. Johnson Recording Secretary 10