07/15/2003 - 00028070CITY OF FRIDLEY
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY & ENERGY COMMISSION MEETING
JULY 15, 2003
C � L' \ � � C � Z � ] :7 � ] � :7 i
Chairperson Johns called the July 15, 2003, meeting to order at 7:31 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Barb Johns, Jack Velin, Barbara Kovacic, Anne Andrews
Members Absent:
Others Present
APPROVAL OF M
MINUTES:
Rich Svanda, Michelle Maher, Pat Rowan
Julie Jones, Environmental Planner
f►�i�►�iI�k��►D/l:ii7►1►�il�►��_\��1�L\���'E:?��►1�:iH'�K�]►�il►�il��y[�7►1
MOTION by Mr. Velin, seconded by Ms. Andrews, to approve the May 20, 2003, Environmental
Quality & Energy Commission minutes as written.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON JOHNS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
NEW BUSINESS:
a. Plastic Bag Recycling
Ms. Johns explained how Cub's discontinuance of its plastic bag recycling service started
a wide-spread discussion of plastic bags. That is why the e-mail, which she forwarded to
the Commission, about the plastic bag tax in New Zealand caught her attention.
The Commission members discussed possible reuse options for plastic bags.
Ms. Kovacic voiced concern that some residents have the perception that plastic bags
are environmentally superior to paper bags.
Ms. Andrews suggested that banks, which are in the Cub stores now, could sell cloth
bags to promote their business names.
Ms. Johns suggested that Cub promote the reusable cardboard boxes they sell more than
they used to.
The Commission members discussed how difficult it would be for retailers to monitor
shoplifting when people are using cloth bags
Ms. Jones suggested that the Commission use the Environmental Essential feature in the
City newsletter to address the topic of plastic bags. After MN Waste Wise makes the
official announcement of the new plastic bag recycling opportunities in September, they
would be able to communicate new drop-off options in the Fridley area to residents, but
the emphasis should be on reduction.
b. Clean Air Minnesota Initiative
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY & ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES
JULY 15, 2003 PAGE 2
Ms. Jones stated Mr. Svanda was unable to attend tonight's meeting. He had planned to
discuss his experience attending the Clean Air Minnesota forum on June 3, 2003.
The Commission members agreed to discuss this item at a later meeting when Mr.
Svanda is present.
The Commission members discussed wind energy.
c. Update on Multi-unit Recycling Grant Project
Ms. Jones reported that she started working on the Eureka Recycling Multiunit Recycling
Grant project two weeks ago. To date, three apartment complexes in Fridley have been
selected to participate in the grant. One complex is Springbrook Apartments, a 361 unit
complex with nine separate dumpster and recycling locations. The second complex is
Oak Hill Apartments, a 34 unit building, that has struggled with recycling and possibly has
some language barrier issues. A third complex is Norton Avenue Apartments, a seven-
unit building, where recycling has been unsuccessful for a number of years.
Ms. Jones stated the purpose of the recycling grant project is to create and test an
educational tool kit that can be duplicated across the state. Eureka Recycling, the lead
agency on the grant, is planning to use focus groups to test certain educational concepts
to find out what motivates apartment dwellers to recycle. Waste reduction is a major goal
of the project — both through increased recycling and increased reuse of household items
like furniture. Door-to-door campaigning is planned to be a key form of education.
Ms. Jones stated that right now she is gathering information on the weight of recycling
and garbage being collected at each location for a period of four weeks. That way
improvements can be measured at the end of the project.
Ms. Andrews asked how Georgetown Apartments is doing with recycling.
Ms. Jones stated that due to its internal storage and confusing collection system, she has
been unable to monitor the recycling at Georgetown. She explained that she decided not
to select Georgetown for the pilot project since staff has had difficulties getting
cooperation from the management there in the past.
d. Report on Plans for a Fall Recycling Drop-off Day
Ms. Jones reported that Green Lights Recycling will be collecting electronics, appliances,
and fluorescent lamps on Saturday, October 11, at the old recycling center site. They will
be charging their cost for recycling these items, which is about double of what residents
used to pay. She said this event is an experiment to see if residents are willing to pay
higher prices for the convenience of a close location to home. It is also an experiment to
see if enough people will participate to make it worth the company's time and advertising
costs. The City did agree to pay half of the advertising costs and put the printed notices in
the City utility bills, which costs the City nothing.
Ms. Kovacic raised the concern that the site will be overwhelmed with only one event
during the year.
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY & ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES
JULY 15, 2003 PAGE 3
Ms. Jones agreed that this was a concern, but that it is likely that the high prices will keep
many people from participating. She concluded that the event is an experiment that the
City agreed to pursue since it appeared a better option than doing nothing.
e. Consideration of Canceling August 19 Meeting
Ms. Jones explained that she will be gone on vacation the week of August 19. The
Commission could still meet, but would have to take its own minutes.
MOTION by Ms. Kovacic, seconded by Mr. Velin, to cancel the August 19, 2003,
Environmental Quality & Energy Commission meeting.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON JOHNS DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. OLD BUSINESS:
a. Discussion of Springbrook Nature Center Closure
Ms. Johns explained that the City Council decided in May to study the feasibility of
creating a golf course at Springbrook Nature Center. Then, at the 2004 budget work
session, the City Manager proposed to lay off the Springbrook Nature Center staff but
keep the park trails open, eliminating all programming.
Ms. Jones explained that the City Council needs to authorize a$10,000-15,000
expenditure to delineate the wetlands in order to move forward to complete the golf
course analysis.
The Commission members discussed possible funding options to keep Springbrook
staffed.
Ms. Andrews asked if the watershed project is moving forward in light of the debate going
on over the future of the Nature Center.
Ms. Jones explained that the project is moving forward, but there is concern. She also
explained the status of the project.
b. Update on Springbrook Watershed Implementation Project
Ms. Jones reported that the City Council approved an agreement with WSB & Associates,
the engineering contractor for the Springbrook Watershed Project, at its meeting on July
14. This agreement is for the final design work to expand the existing storm water pond at
85th Avenue and University Avenue. The design will need to be approved by the City of
Spring Lake Park, the City of Blaine, and MnDOT before bids can be obtained. Fall
construction is planned with landscaping to be completed in the spring of 2004.
Ms. Kovacic asked how the Advisory Committee for the Springbrook Watershed Project
reacted to the news about the Nature Center operational changes.
Ms. Jones stated there was great debate at the Advisory Committee's June 26th meeting
about whether or not the project should move forward since the educational opportunities
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY & ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES
JULY 15, 2003 PAGE 4
at the Nature Center would be lost. The MPCA representative made it very clear that the
Clean Water Partnership grant money would need to be repaid if the use of the Nature
Center changed to a revenue-generating facility like a golf course. It was unclear if other
grant funds from other sources would need to be repaid. In the debate, it was clarified
that the City of Fridley is responsible financially as all contracts are through Fridley, the
lead agency for the project. So, the Committee approved the proposal to move forward,
knowing that Fridley could stop the project if funding was withdrawn.
c. Report on the Moore Lake Shoreline Buffer Landscaping
Ms. Jones showed pictures of the Moore Lake Shoreline Buffer Landscaping Project area
to date, compared to a year ago.
The Commission members were very pleased to see the current condition of the project
area.
Ms. Jones stated it was surprising to see that the entire area is completely vegetated now
with plants other than turf grass. She noted also that users (likely fishermen) in the area
have created a narrow trail through the entire length of the landscape buffer, but it hasn't
damaged the plants much.
I_\�11L�1�1:7►1►�il�►��
MOTION by Ms. Kovacic, seconded by Ms. Andrews, to adjourn the meeting.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON JOHNS DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED AND THE JULY 15, 2003, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY & ENERGY COMMISSION
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:12 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Julie A. Jones
Staff Liaison