Loading...
02/01/1965 - 5966REGULAR COUNCIL AWING AGENDA - FEBRUARY 10 1965 0 $Q'Q SK&I Regular Meeting, January 18, 1965, Pages 1 - 19. MIR wins, s:__ 1. Consideration of Preliminary Plat - Commerce Park (Tabled 1/18/65), ,PURhE i fibamS tt 2. On Fined Plat - CcW"WCO Park, Page 20, raw B BysIMSS t 30 C Consideration of Health and Hospitalisation insurance$ Pages Z Zi & & 2Z0 40 B Bids for Gasoline (Opened Nooks February 1, 1965), P Pages 2 23 - - 25. • 5 5o B Bids for Liquid chlorine (opened Moon, February 1, 1965), P Pages 2 26 & & 27, 6. S Safety Committee Meeting Minutes, January 20, 1965s Pages 2 28 & & 29. 7. Communications, Pages 30 - 33. (a) Swanson: Park Committee Appointment (b) County Auditor: Gopher Bounty (c) Finance Directors Commerce Park Assessments (d) N.S.S.S.D.: Basements VISITORS: S. Claims, 90 Estimates, loo LiCenSes, 110 Consideration of Agreement - 73rd Avenue N.EO, 0 12. Approval of Deed to School District #13, Page 340 Page 350 Page 360 Pages 37 - 400 i2EMULAR COUNCIL METING AGGMA 'MARY l0 1965 (Continued) 13© Consideration of Authorizing Final Plans and Specifications - City Halle 14, Correction to Plat - Codsran's Additions Pages 41 & 42. 15. Resolution Setting Liquor Store wages - On -Sale, Pages 43 & 440 16, Resolution Ordering Improvement and Final Plans and Specifications - ST, 1965 -1, Pages 45 & 460 17. Resolution Relating to Junior College,, Page 470 18, Four Resolutions Splitting Special Assessments, Pages 48 - 510 0 li 0 REGULAR COUNCIL META AGENDA C 3 TS - FEBRUARY 10 1965 .OLD BILSMSs: �r�rr� 1. CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT - COM86RCd PARK (TABLED 1/18/65): The Council discussion at the last meeting will be found in the second paragraph on Page 12 of this agenda. 2. ON FINAL PLAT - COMMRCE PARKS The notice of Hearing is an Page 20. if the final plat is not revised as per the aeeting of January 18, 1965, this matter would have to be tabled until the next Meeting in February. see memo on Page 320 3. CMSIDERAT'IOM OF HEALTH AND 808PITAL=ATIoM InsURANCS s The letter from Dirk SOXMinger, the City General Agent, on Pages 21 and 22 is self- OWlanatory. M. Sc'hillinger will be at the areting to discuss it with the Council. 4. BIDS FOR GASOLIRS (OPFmD soon, F88RUARY 1, 1965)s The tabulation sheets are on Pages 23 through 25. There will be a ion available for you from the Director of Public Works at the meetingo 5- BADS FOR LIQUID aMMIM (OPEMD NOON, FEBRUARY 1, 1965) s The tabulation sheet is on Page 26. An article from the "League" magazine mentioned previously by Mayor Nee is placed on Page 27 for your information. 6. SAFETY COMMTi'TEE MEETING MXNMES - JANUARY 28, 1965t The minutes are on Pages 28 and 29, and any item you wish to discuss can be discussed, at this time. 7. COMMICATIONss (a) Swansons Park Ccx=ittee Appointments The letter on Page 30 is self- mcplanatory. (b) County Auditors Gopher Bountys The mono on page 31 is somewhat self - explanatory. The portion of interest to the Council is that, presently for gopher bounty, the City reimburses the kids bringing in the two front Beet of a gopher, 100 for each two front feet. This 100 then is reimbursed to the City by the County. Their new rules and regulations are that the City, if it wishes to receive a 100 reimbursement from the County, must pay the "bounty - hunters" 200 for each two front gopher feet. Last year, the City took in 1,760 pairs of front feet, so that my 0 REGULAR COUNCIL METING ACE M COMETS - FEBRUARY 1, 1965 (Continued) guess would be that many of these gophers are caught outside of Fridley and brought here because the City is paying a bounty. If the City should discontinue Ming a bounty, I would imagine that the boys would find some other comity that will pay for gopher feet. Your action would be either to authorize this 104 bounty by the City, or that the City offer no bounty. (c) Finance Directors Com Wee Park Assessments This mono on Page 32 refers to Item #2, above, and is referred to in mV comments above. I will attempt to have more in- formation for your at the meeting. (d) N.S,S.S.D.s Sasamsntss The letter on Page 33 is self - euplanatory. S. CLAIMSs The claim numbers are on Page 34, Detail of the claims is included in the envelope with the agenda. • 9. LSTMW=S: the list of the three partial estimates is found on Page 35. 10. LICENSRSs The list of licenses for your consideration will be found an Page 36 11- COTSXERRATION OF AGREE. rr - 73RD AVFAWE NOELTHBASTs This agrw®ant on Pages 37 through 40 has been drawn by the City Attorney, and approved by the attorney for the contractor. Action here& if the Council agrees with the makaW of the agreement, would be to auth- orize execution of same by the Mayor and City Merger. 12. APPROVAL OF DUD TO SCROOL DISTRICT #13s The City Attorney will have this deed with him at the mating,, and Council action would be to authorize the Mayor and City Massager to execute the deed for delivery to School District #13. This is foot the little pio- shaped piece of property over by Regis Lane. 13. causTIMATion AUTBO unm FINAL PLAns aw SPBCIFICATIcas - CITY HAZJs I will have two sets of plans for the Council at this mestAM. The City Attorney advises that the action ordering the preparations of final plans and specifications can be made by motions. • 14. CORRECTION To PLAT - commis AwlTions On Page 41 is a certi- fication by a surveyor of an error and on Page 42 is a drawing showing the error. The Council action can be by motion approving the correction. REGULAR COUNCIL FWXT fG AGFAMA C%IiM4TS - FEBRUARY It 19655 (Continued) 15. RESOLUTION SETTING LIQUOR STORE WAGES - ON -SALEs The letter of Page 43 is self- explanatocy. The resolution is an Page 44, Although the figures in the resolution are on a weakly basis, this would wean that the 40 hour baacterder is increased from $2.55 an hour to $2.65 an hour, as would be ansy extra bartenderso The 48 hour bartenders would increase from $2.50 an hour to $2.60 an hour. Waitresses would be increased from $1,39 an hour for 40 hour week to $1.55 an hour. Extra waitresses would go from $1.65 an hour to $1.70 an houro 16, RESOLUTION ORWRIM INFROVZME NT AND FINAL PLANS AND SPZCIFICAd'IONS, ST. 1965 -1s This resolution on Pages 45 and 46 is based upon nay Interpretation of the public hearing, and also, discussion with some of the Councilmen, and with the City Sngia eeac. items can be added, and deleted, from and to this resolution. 17. RESOLUTION RZLATING TO JUNIOR COLLECTS I drew this resolution, Page 47, at the request of Chairman o °Bannon of the County Board. I would like to point out that item #3 of the resolution would be financed at least 30% by taxpayers in the City of Fridley, so • that this factor should be taken into account; if the Council should desire that the Junior College be located in Fridley. Conversation with the Chairman of the County Board seems to indicate that Fridley is not being considered as a site, because property can be purchased at march less per acre some distance from Fridley, although without all the utilities and other im- provements in, it would appear to me that the purchase of the land because it is cheap at this time, would be false econeW 18. FOUR RESOLUTIONS SPLITTING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS: These resolutions are on Pages 48 through 51, and are the usual routine resolutions. One motion can be used to adopt the resolutions, and they will be separated in the minutes, 0 0 Page 1. REGULAR COUNCIL 1,1EETING 11INUTES – JA1iUARY 180 1965 A regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fridley was called to orter by Mayor Nee at 8:20 P.M. OPENING CERE DNY: Councilman Kirkham introduced Troop 20 of the Fridley Boy Scouts who conducted an opening ceremony consisting of presentation of the Flag and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. Mayor Nee extended his thanks to the Troop for conducting tka opening ceremony. ROLL_ CALL: Members Present: Nee, Kirkham, Sheridan, Wright, Thompson Members Absent: None AP MVAL OF r;INUTES � REGUL iR 1-2=IM JANUARY 4. 1965: Councilman Wright made a correction to the minutes of the January 4, 1%5 meeting changing the motion by Sheridan under Ward #1 of the Building Board cn page 9 • to motion by Kirkham to re- appoint Carrol K. Hauge to the Building B,Awd representing Ward No. 1 for a term of 1 year commencing January 15, 1965. Motion by Wright to approve the minutes of the Regular Co,mcil 14es -Ang of January 4, 1965, as corrected. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimouslyo Mr. Braun and Mr. Manley of the Minnesota Highway Department,:were present at the council meeting. Mayor Nee asked the City Manager to explain the purposes of the discussion with the Minnesota Highway Department. The City Manager stated that the•City requested the Minnesota Highway Department to construct a service road on the East side of VAIV from 67th Avenue to Rice Creek Terrace. He exp&Lined that two garages presently have driveways Which enter onto the present T.H. 147. The'city has a dedicated right -of -gray along the East side of the easement of the Highway Department on T.H, #47. Apparently the combination of the dedicated easement which the city owns and the outlet 1"rom the two driveways of the two garages onto T.H. #47 complicated the communications between the City and the'fli.ghway Department, resulting in a minunderstanding with the Minnesota Highway Department. 0 The City Man service road Terrace. fir. Braun of t dedicated ease that the Minne access from th Rice Creek Ter. Terrace Plat 3 connect with T of restricted Access from Lo, IV order of th to the rear of owned by the C The City Mana on their land purchase of a that previous to have the i,i He stated fur to reach Miss Page 2. stated that hefelt it was important to the City to get a a the East side of T.H. #47 from 67th Avenue to Rice Creek Minnesota Highway Department agreed that the City had a Ut along the East side of Minnesota Tell. #47. He also stated to Highway Department had purchased the right of restricted previous property owners along the East side of T.H. #47 from ae to 67th tvemw, except for Lot 1, Block 29 Rice Creels Pir. Braun stated further that the two driveways which presently :. #47, are connected without permit and in spite of the purchase ,cess connected to the property on which driveways are located* 1, Block 2, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 3 has been dosed with T.H. #47 Minnesota Highway Department. There is possible access, however, hese properties by construction of an alley on the right- of-way WO explained that people did not know that the access to T.H. #47 restricted because of the change of ownership since the s by the Minnesota Highway Department. The City Manager stated hway drawings showed the service road, which the City would like sots Highway Department complete, as planned for construction. that Westbound traffic on Rice Creek Terrace should be able ppi Street. • Mayor Nee ask Mr. Braun how a snow plow will be able to turn around at the dead and of Ri a Creek Terrace, if the proposed service road is not constructed. Mr. Braun answ red that the City easement still exists and this could be used for the tu=rn of snow plows. The City Manager stated that property owners should have ac ess to a fronting service road. Councilman Wright stated that proper flow of traffic required the construction of the service road along the East side of T . #j47. Braun stated hat construction of the proposed service road would require the owners of the roperty along the service road to repurchase the right of unrestricted a cess from the i,sinnesota Highway Department. Councilman Wright st-,.ted that it would be cheaper for the property owners to pay the Highway Department for the right of unrestricted access than it would be for the property owners to pay or construction of a service road along the same easement, Councilman Wri ht asked what legal steps would be required of the City and the property owner in order to re- purchase unrestricted access to the service road. Mr. Braun sta that this would require appraisals of the present values of such unrestrie ed access. Councilman Sh from Lot 1, B 14r. Manly of owners could placed under City could ri • adjacent prof drawing showi Ian asked, what legal steps would be required to obtain access t 2, of Rice Creek Terrace Plat 3, to the service road. D Minnesota Highway Department stated that adjacent property for access to the service road and the service road could be 3truction upon their request. The City Manager stated that the e action to get the service road provided the City was an y owner. He stated that the City had been misled by the original construction of the service road as the City has now requested its C� • • v City there sho North East wove South Mr. Manley and ma.inte East -West to justify Mayor Nee that the C road for people and excessive. connection st ted tha be a black Department Mr. Braun stated tha of ac:-ess obtained q incurred b V1r. Braun 11r. Braun installat; Universit, by the s c with 0 sbo: accident The Hl gbw of 40th k does not Motion by than const along the service r motion ca Page 3. agar stated that Rice Creek Terrace is an East4iest arterial and be a connection from the end of Rice Creek Terrace to 67th !Avenue Councilman Sheridan stated that traffic on Rice Creek Terrace will order to connect with 67th Avenue North East or Mississippi Street* ked,, if the traffic was sufficient to ,;ustify the initial cost .ce of the service road. Councilman Sheridan answered, that the ffie pattern along Rice Creek Terrace provided sufficient traffic e initial cost and maintenance of the service road. nd Councilman Wright explained to the Highway Department officials ty could not very well assess property owners fronting on the service e construct ^gin of the,road because it would be used by many more the cost to the property owners along the service road would be Mr. Manley suggested the construction of a travel road to provide between Lot 1, Block 2, and Rice Creek Terrace., Councilman Sheridan the street between Lot 11 Block 2, and Rice Creek Terrace should top street. Mayor H ee asked if it would require Minnesota Highway approval to sell back the restricted access to the City of Fridley. nswered that the Highway Department would be involved. Councilman Wright he expected it would be easy to get approval for selling the right the City. Mayor Nee stated that he thought such approval could be ickly. Councilman 14right asked if the change in the design of T.H. #47 the extension of the service road would hold up construction of T.H. '47. nswered that it would not* t--ted th�.t the survey by the ,Minnesota Highway Department showed that n of traffic signals at the intersections of 61st Avenue with Avenue, t<and Mississippi Street with University Avenue were justified of traffic* The volume of traffic at the intersection of T.H. #47 ,e Road did not war.: -ant installation of traffic signals although the, cord possibly did warrant the installation of traffic signals. Department also planned to inotall traffic signals at the intersections nue and !,4 ;h 11venue, and possibly at County Road 102. The traffic grant the construction of signals at the intersection of 53rd Avenue* !right to instruct the City Manager and the City Attorney to pursue action of the service road from 67th Avenue to Rice Creek Terrace hst side of T.H. #47 and the rLpurchase of access to the proposed .d. Seconded by Kirkham. Up,--,n a voice vote, there being no nays,, the -ied unanimously. The City agar read the notice of the hearing. Mayor Nee stated that the purpose o this hearing was to provide the council with the necessary information to d eta a whether or not the proposed improvements should be made. He stated further t t some of these improvements were initiated by petition of the property owners, s e were initiated by the council., and some were initiated by the developer of the land. In 1:.ost of the cases, the council will not order the im.,roveme s unless the property owners want the improvements. Mayor Nee explained further t t two options were available to the property ownerse one option was for construct n of a 30 foot street, the other, the construction of a 36 foot pavement. The highe standards which have been adopted by the 'lit;, delete the options of n LJ • • asphalt cur of curs estim_-.tes o available t The P -iayor a of a 36 foo that the Ci Area. The The trend t street widt more fay.ili cars our the the clearan parking on for two cars allows a 20 traffic. I driving on The City Ma on a 36 f oo additional th 30 foot Mayor Nee individua Page 4. - :g and all the proposed strec ; improvements with new construction be concrete curb and gutter. %.ayor Nee explained that -the spcci2 ,-assessments for the proposed improvements were the property owners who would be charged with the costs of the ked the City Manager to explain the adv- ..ntages of the construction street as op,,.osed to a 30 foot street. The City Manager stated y of Fridley has the lowest standard street width in the Metropolitan o ncil has decided to leave the choice of street width to the citizen. increasing use of automobiles, will require a greater standard in the future. The City Manager pointed out that, in the future, s wil o:,rn more than t wocars and will undoubtedly park their additional street,, A "zed car occiVies an 8 foot width of the street including e required to pass the parked car. On a 30 foot street, With cars oth sides a 14 foot width of street way remains which is not enough to pass each other. The use of the 36 foot street, on the other hand, foot strip of street way in the middle of the street for two way the winter time, when snow plowing narrows the width of the street: 30 foot street is much more difficult than driving on a 36 foot street, agi,r also rotated that fire trucks could travel with less difficulty street than on a 30 foot street. The cost of construction of the feet of street width is 10% more than the cost of construction of that each proposed street improvement would be discussed Mayor Nee e#plained the purpose of the proposed impyvvement. He asked if anyone present was interested in the proposed street improvement or if there were any objections the proposed improvement. There were no objections to the improvement. Mayor Nee present wa street imp East, 9 tat narrow as people all street as himself. street wh A property the street plained the purpose of the proposed improvement. He asked if anyone interested in or objected to, the construction of the proposed vement. A property owner, Eugene G. Haas of 5847 — 7th Street North that he did not use the street. He favored making the street as ssible since few people did use the street. He stated further that ver the City of Fridley would benefit by the construction of the chts he would, but construction of the street was not useful to Hass stated that the cost of the street was a lot of money for a h he woUd never use and other people Mould twobably never, use. r, Lynn W. Gallup, 5851 4th Street, stated that in his opinion an eyesore in its present condition. He stated further that he lJ 0 preferred to deleti Councilman general op; There were Mr. Gallup 7th Street and in use street wer the street Wright rata good acces preferred stated tha street imp any choice stated the Mr. Gallup to have no suggested the planni Page 5. wide street since the dif.erence in costs wus lo% As an alternative the improvement, he preferred to have the street closed altogether, ght asked the visitors present at the council meeting for a n of their preferences to having 36 foot streets or 30 foot streets. replies to the question. Diced the opinion that the closing of 59th "venue — 4th Street to would provide prettier surroundings then having the street improved Mayor Nee asked who would :pow the grass on the easement if the vacated. Mr. Hass and Mr. Gallup both suggested to the council that * vacated and a mall be installed on the easement. Councilman d that a street might have to be constructed in order to provide for fire department equipment to the area. Mr. Hass stated that he t to pay for the construction of the street. Councilman Wright the construction of the storm sewer might be delayed if the proposed 'vement on 59th Avenue were not installed, and hence there may not be ,n the installation of the proposed street improvement. Mayor Nee no action,.,ould be taken without the approval of the property owners. aid that he would prefer to have some decision made on the as to whether the street was to be improved or vacated rather than .ecision at all made with regard to 59th Avenue. Councilman Wright at the matter could be referred to the planning commission or to consultant.. Mayor Nee ated that the improvement would not be made if the street were not needed He pointed out that the property owners along 59th Avenue drove on 6trects hich were paid for by other property owners in the city, and other property o ers :eight be using i�treets covered by this improvement. Mayor Nee si d that a council would deteraine if a street were needed on 59th Avenue and take a ropriate action. Mayor Nee ixPlained the proposed improvement and asked if anyone present had any object Ions tc the construction of the proposed improvement. There were no objections to the improvement. Mayor Nee asked that the minutes record that there were no petitions for the proposed improvement on 60th Avenue — University •venue to Ath Street. Mayor Nee plained the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if amyone present h objections to the proposed improvement or was interested in the improvemen . Property o , Vern Bandely 5980 6th Streetp asked the council what the reasons were for t proposed improvement. Councilman Sheridan stated that the improveQaen was because of the installation of a storm seater which would require reconstruc on of the street after the completion of the installation of the storm sews . Vern Bandel stated that he preferred a 36 foot street width. Property owl the estimate from 5th St; assessment. for this imp assessments were oppose he was in that it wo sewer than be carried anyway and further t in good co that were did not obj for constri� asked if thl this year,' replies. 14 in the pro j given to th Mayor Nee • was inter Property of petitions I Avenue). for the iml sides of tl and asked I that it wao asked the q asked if aj Avenue to J There were of Arthur 9 Page 6. er, Kenneth Johnson, 5980 7th Street,•a,sked what was the cost of d assessments on his property for the construction of 60th Avenue ®t to 7th Street. Mayor Nee gave him the value of the estimated Kenneth Johnson asked upon what basis his lot was being assessed rovement, Councilman Wright explained the method of calculating on corner lots. Councilman Wright asked if the property owners to the construction of the storm sewer. Vern Bandel answered that Ivor of the construction of the stormsawer. The City Engineer stated .d be cheaper to re -pave the street after construction of the storm It would be to patch the street. mayor Nee asked if the project should )ut. Vern Bandel stated that the street needed to be repaired she project might as well be carried out. The City Engineer stated � it v.--s the policy of the City to replace streets that were not lition, upon construction of other improvements and to patch those i good condition. Vern Bandel stated that he could not say that he ;ct to the proposed improvement, but that if the street were torn up stion of the storm sewer, he would want it fixed. Mayor Nee then s property owners preferred not to have the construction completed ,ut to bring up the action again in a year or two. There were no ayor Mee asked if there was anyone aloe present who was interested ;ct or had any objections to it. There were no further objections 3 project, dOYfR�fiT:�«� ined the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if anyone in the improvement or had any objections to it. ner Prand Ravinka, 1500 Osborne Road, r sked if there were arq ar the proposed improvement of Arthur Street (Osborne Rd. to 76th ayor Nee answered that 41% of the property owners had petitioned'\ rovement, Mr. Hliwinka stated that his property fronted on both e proposed improvements, that the assessments were getting too heavy f the improvement had to be constructed. Councilman Wright answered not necessary to construct the improvement at this time. Mr. Blavinka ounc;il to forego making the improvement for a year or t•7o. Mayor Nee yono else was interested in the improvement of 76th Avenue (Central rthur Street), or had any objections to making the improvement. none. Mayor Nee stated that the council would crop the improvement trout (Osborne Road to 76th Avenue) at this time. - Mayor Nee 4xplained the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if anyone present wa o interested in the improvement or had any objections to it. There were no objectins to the proposed improvement, S Mayor Nee plained the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if anyone present wa interested in the improvement or if there were any objections to the . proposed provement. There were no objections to the improvement. ID Page 7. Mayor Pelee sated that t_:is improvement had already beendeleted. Mayor Nee e#plained the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if anyone present we interested in the improvement or had any objections to the proposed improvement There were no objections to the improvement. Mayor Nee a p1ained the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if anyone present was interested in the proposed improvement or had azW objections to constructio of the proposed improvement. There were no objections to the proposed rovement. Mayor Nee e#plained the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if anyow present w3rovement. interested in the improvement or had any objections to the proposed There were no objections to the proposed improvement. r . Mayor Nee plained the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if anyone present a interested in the proposed improvement or if there were any objections to the propos improvement. There were no objections to the proposed improvement. Mayor Nee ].wined the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if anyone present waolinterested in the improvements or if there were any objections to the. proposed rovements. The prope owner Charles Sheridan, 1311 Highway 100, questioned the council concerning method of assessment of his property for the proposed improveaaeat. Mayor Nee a ted that this could be discussed further at the assessment hearing for the imi vement. Thomas Eri son,, represent.tive of School District #13s asked for the construction of the imJno vement for the fenefit of the new school. He stated that construction of the neahool would require good streets in the neighborhood. Councilman Wright asif the school would need additional. room along the street to ]road and unloaMr. Erickson stated that the school would provide room on its own property the school busses to turn around' to load and unload. Mayor Nee asked if school would require parking on the street fronting the school. Mr. Erickstated that the school preferred to have parking on its own property and to ha parking on the street in front of the school. • Page 8. • ' /16T WAY KATE_' RVIEJ ' Mayor Nee isined the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if amyr present wera interested in the improvement or if there were ary objections to the proposed iiizovement. A property wner, Walter Englehart, owning property in Riverwood Manor Additions stated thall he had no objections to the proposed improvement and thought constructs of a 36 foot wide street would be advantageous to his property. Mayor Nee asked if there were any other objections to the proposed ;#s Vrovement, There were objections* Mayor Nee plained the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if ar�pr were inter " in the improvement or had any objections to the proposed improvemen , .'here were no objections to the proposed improvement. Mayor Nee lained the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if any present we interested in the proposed improvement or if there were any objections to the pro sed improvement. Mayor Nee requested that the minutes at-Ae that • Arthur E. - -ith, Alfred Oldenberg, and flames Mensinger, property owners along 64th Avenu , objected to the proposed improvement by presenting Petition #1 -1965. Mayor Nee §xplained the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if anyone present wee interested in the proposed improvement or had any objections to the proposod improvement. There were no objections. Mayor Nee plained the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if arq present w interested in the proposed improvement or had any objections to the propos improvement. There were no objections to the proposed improvement. Mayor Nee ax plained the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if amp► present w e interested in the Woposed improvement or if there were arw objections to the sod improvement. A propert owner Mr. Kohler, 5254 Washington Street, owning property at 5381, 5371, and 361 -- 6th Street North East, stated that he was in favor of the improveme and favored the construction of a 36 foot right -of -way* • Page 9, Maur Nee exp tt:erested ed benefits of the proposed improvement and asked if amy present were in the proposed improvement or had any objections to the proposed rovement. There were no objections to the improvement* Mayor Nee ask if any present were interested in the proposed improvement or if there were sny objections to the proposed improvement* There were no objections to the proposed improvement* Mayor Nee ex1. ined the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if e V present were nterested in the proposed improvement or if there were amy objections to the propos improvement* There were no objections to the proposed Mayor Nee ex ed the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if ear present were Interested in the proposed improvement or if there were any objections to the proposed improvement. There were no objections to the proposed improvement* 4."V&VJ.VIY QA - j5/ - ' L r ! " U y Moor Nee :Jewxcained the benefits of the proposed improvements and asked if wW present weterested in the proposed improvement or if t here were arty objections to the proimprovement. There were no objections to the proposed improvement, Mayor Nee wenlLained the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if wW present were nterested in the proposed improvement or if there were any objections the proposed improvement. A property o , V.M. Nagel, 970 Osborne Road, stated his objections to the proposed imp vement. The coi.ncil deleted the project. Mayor Nee ex. fined the benefits of the proposed improvement and asked if there were any obj tions to the proposed improvement or if any were interested in the improvement. There were no objections to the proposed improvement* Mayor Nee ex were any int to the propo improvement. Mr. Schraede: improvement directed the part of the j ained the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if there ested in the proposed improvement or if there ware any objections d improvement. There were no objections to the proposed 8066 Ruth Street North East, asked the council to complete the Ruth Street, from Liberty Street to Ruth Girale. The council Aministration to investigate the possibility of completing this oject separately* • ELY STREET - Mayor Nee ex were any who objections t Property own Street, obje improvement. UREM .SA_ Mayor Nee ex were interes to the propo Property own objections t :baprovemnent. LONU �� -LOW S i Mayor Nee ex present war objections t • Property own the proposed Council dale • Page 10. ained the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if there ere interested in the proposed improvement or if there were any the proposed iprovement. , Clarence Moen of 303 Longfellow Street, and James Cox of 289,E1y ad to the proposed improvement. The council deleted the proposed EAST IUVIa ROAD TU RAIL AD 'rWCBS: ned the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if any in the proposed improvement or if there were any objections . mprovetaent. , Ruby Hoglund, 239 Liberty Street North East, stated her the proposed improvement. The council deleted the proposed w ained the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if arty interested in the proposed improvement or if there were any the proposed improvement. r, Clarence Moen of 303 Longfellow Street, stated his objections to improvement and asked the council to delete the proposed improvement. ad the proposed improvement. Mayor Nee lained the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if ar present w interested in the proposed improvement or if there were any objections to the pro ad improvement. Several property owners stated objections to the proposed ovement and the council deleted the proposed improvement, Mayor Nce lamed the purpose of the proposed improvement and asked if any present we interested in the proposed i_::provenent or if there were any objections to tirz propo improvement. Property owners objected to the proposed improve® nt. TI* count deleted the proposed improvement. 2h l) Mayor Nee as on the subje declared thv elated the proposed storm sewer improvemment. ad if there were air other comments, or objections, or statementst t of the proposed improvements. There were none.- Mayor Nee hearing closed. • • Page 11. Motion by Wright to adopt Ordinance No. 298 Amending Sections 3.04 and 3.05 Lpon the second reading and publish the same. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, 1here being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. - SECOND READIX DF 0RD1NANd M A ,.TING- LMUE, NO iE `S Tr 'L -.D t Mayor Nee ask if the problems concerning the proposed street vacation had been solved. a City Manager answered that according to the information he had received the p blems concerning the proposed street vacation had been resolved. Motion by Kirkham to prove Ordinance No. 299 vacating 64* Avenue North East upon second readins and publish t same. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the mots carried unanimously. n. •..AVr, fltr Al.1T l!"Ir nTnAT AUrAn"r?1t(MPVMrP0. fm ni rn 1 // IAZI. Councilman Wri ht moved to concur with the appointment of Helen Sampson as Parke and Playground Sub - Committee representative to the Joint City- School Recreation Commission, fo a term of one -years, commencing January 1, 1965. Seconded by Thompson. Upoi a voice vote, there being no nays, the nation carried unani::,ous]y. Motion by Kirkiam to re- appoint Whitney S. Graeff to the Joint City-School, Recreation Comrission for a term of Z years commencing on January 1, 1965- Seconded by Shiridan. Upon a voice vote, there beinxr no nays, the motion carried unanimiusly. Motion by Wri t to appoint Wayne Saunders to the Board of Appeals for a term of 3 years co ending on January 1, 1965. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there b ng no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Motion by She dan to add the name of Mr. Francis VanDan to the UA of proposed members to be ppointed to the Charter Commission. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote., being no nays, the motion carried unanimoi.sly'. Motion by She dan to add the names of Wilbur Whitmore, and William Tonco to the list of proposed memLers to be appointed to the Charter Commission. Seconded by Wright. Ulon a voice vote, there being no nays,* the motion carried unanimously. Motion by Wri t to approve and endorse the proposed list of names for appointment to the Charts Commission. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays' the 4tion carried unanimously. The City Man to aligning dedic '.te the the recommen Seconded by unanimously. explained the recommendation of the Planning Commission relative Way with Hickory Drive and stated that Mr. Berry agreed to yet proposed in the project. Motion by Sheridan to concur with n of the Planning Commission to align 71st-Way with Hickory Drive. yam. Upon a voice voted there being no nays, the motion carried • r� LJ is The City Ma; council to 90 days. vi and declare period of 9 to compose splits, rez no nays, th The City Ma with the PI the prelims; Subdivision 11. Mayor ; actI on of t the propert to table ac Seconded by unanimously Motion by the Lot S; being no Page 12. iger explained the actions of the Planning Commission in asking the ,elare.a moratorium on requests for rezoning, lot splits, etc., for Lion by Wright to concur with the :action of the Planning commission i moratorium on requests for rezoning, lots splits etc., for a days be - inning on January 18, and directing the City Manager letter explaining the situation to people making requests for lot wing, etc. Seconded by Thompsone upon a voice vote, there being :-aoti.:n carried unanimously. .gar explained the action of the Planning Commission to concur sand Su'bdivisiongand SWreets and Utilities Sub - Committees to approve .ry plat (P.S. #;62 -10, Mike Hafner), bein Lot four (4). Auditor's 172 a.11 of NW 4 of Section 11, all of SWt of the NW -j of Section is stated that if the proposed preliminary plat were granted, the Minnesota Highway Department to take an easement of 109 feet from would induce the owner to ask for a replat. notion by Sheridan on on the proposal to the February 1 regular meeting of the Council. right. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried ;ht to approve the action of the Planning Commission recommending L.S. ##65 -01. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there the motion carried unanimously. The City ger, reviewed the negotiations between the City and Don Pielow to obtain an ement for the street. 14otion by Sheridan to turn over to the legal depa ant for processing further negotiations with the property owner. Seconded by fright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion esarried Motion by S eridan to receive the minutes of the Safety Committee meeting of January 6, 65. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no neye, the motion arried unanimously, The City Fi ante Director explained that the property owner, Mr. flafners felt that he sh d not pay for the sanitary sewer main assessment. He has installed sewer late s at his own expense, but two of the lots do not have sewer service. Mr. Comstoe stated that the laterals cannot provide sewer service to these 2 lots. The cation of the main interceptor is deep enough for connection of the laterals to the main interceptor. Councilman Wright and Mayor Nee asked if the City had ap roved the construction of the late=rals. The City Engineer explained that an ou ide consultant, Suburban Enginearing, had approved the plans of the property owns, was in no way property own the property that his prop installation on each plat Upon a voice Motion by Muni.cipali- the motion The City Atti for the City taken to stagy traffic viol court rules whether the an assistant answer assistant pr • further that acquires sufj and to file Upon n voice x7otion by S Gas Company Kirkham. U Motion by School Dis requested. the motion Councilman S: lidmesota Hi; acceptable t • cons cruction Addition has construction Page 13,m VW the installation of the proposed laterals and that the City involved in the construction of the shallow laterals by the . Motion by Sheridan instructing the administration to advise veer that sewer service was available at the interceptor main, rty would be assessed I)r construction of the sanitory sewer main and that f a drain field for a private sewer requires a given area of land or each residence served by the private sewer. Seconded by Kirkham. ote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously, idan to table the questions raised by the Kimesota League of . Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, 'there being no nayse . ried unanimously* ey reported that the training session held by the City Attorney lice Department was highly successful, that steps were being rdize court procedures, standardize the forms for handling ons in the City Courts, and that the Judges had agread to adopt the handling of traffic citations. Councilman KirhI= asked sent budget provided for the appointment of a prosecutor and osecutor rather than just a single prosecutor. City Attorney that the time and expense required for the prosecutor and an. tutor could be provided within the existing budget. HD stated my Feikema will be the aide of James Gibbs until Mir. Gibbs lent experience as a city prosecutor. Motion by Wright to receive eommunivat -on from the City Attorney. Seconded by Sheridan te, there being no nays, the , ation carried unanimously„ dan to receive and file the communications from the Minneapolis ting the new and lower rates of the suburban area. Seconded by a voice vote, there being no nays,, the motion carried unanimously. direct`ng the City Attorney to work out a settlement with #13 for the sale of City property to the School District as ,nded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, -ed unanimously. r ridan reported that he and the City Engineer had met with the way Department 60 days earlier and had worked out a preliminary plan the Minnesota Highway Department for participation in the f a storm sewer in Terryvs Addition. He reported that Terry's of been completely platted but that the agreement provides that f the storm sewer can begin when the plat is approved. The Page 14. • Iinnesota ni y Deportment will carry 80% of the cost of one storm sewer line. The ma r part of the cost will be carried by assessments. The City Engineer sta that the proposed final plat plan was signed. Councilman Sheridan sta that the storm sewer will. have to be installed eventually and that the ity should get an greement for particip;tion in the installation of the storm ewer with the Minnesota Highway Department at this time. Lotion by Sheridan instruct the adi.dnistr .tion to get a formal agreement with the tinnesota Higtway Department for partieipatt.on in the construction of the storm sewer i Terry's Addition. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice votes there being n nays, the motion carried unanimously. CLADS: Motion by Vlriffiit., seconded by Sheridan to approve .asneral t.'lmims #4293 through 7,+400. U;.on i. voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Motion by She dan, seconded by Kirkham, to approve Public Utilities Claims #3860 through #3894. Upon a voice vote,, there being no nays,, the motion carried unanimously. Motion by Wrij t, seconded by Thompson, to approve Liquor Claims #7059 through #7110. Upon A. voice votes there being no nays,, the motion carried unanimously. ESTIif =S: Motion by She 'dan, seconded by Wright, to approve the following estimatest • Comstock & Da s, Inc. Consulting En Iveers For the AL nishing of Staking 1"6 County ad "J" and Inspection: MinneaA is, esota 55432 Estimate No. 3 - Sanitary Sewer Improvement Project o. 72 (T.H. #47, North of Mississippi Street) 70.00 Estimate No. 3 - Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 71 (.H. x`47, North of Mississippi Street) 100.00 Estimate No. 2 - Water Improovemant Project No. 34Q-2 ( ping Installation and Pumphouse - Well #61600 - 63rd Avenue Northeast) $ 65.00 Estimate No. 3 - Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 5B ("North of T.H. #100a East of T.H. #47) $ 155.00 Estim•:tc No. 8 - Water Improvement Project No, 34M (M an Hills Booster Plant) 10.00 EstimatInooln o. 2 - Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvement Project . 70 (Riverview Terrace, south of Mississippi Place; (Ashton) Street, South of Ironton Street; 5th Str; South of TOK. 410C W 626.00 9 Estimate No 6 - Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvement Project No. 67 (1964 Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvemen Project) Hurley Co. 49 signal St. Paul, Co. TOTAL Page 15. g' 362.50 1,388.50 Estimate 4 - Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvement Project No 67 and Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 68 (19 construction - For detailed description see Page 7 of September 21, 1964 Council agenda) %te 38,332.19 D. W. Rickey 1841 Universi' St. Paul, Kin: Estimate No. 34-M . Upon a voice i UCEtu_ SES: Notion by Sher k�L�:C'PRSCA�. Bond Electric 1642 Carroll I St. Paul, 14iv North star Eli fAeLa S. a HEAT : Bow34r Compai 511 E. Luce. S1 Minneapolis, b imm Mooney Constri 5042 Lowry Tel Minneapolis, P i Companry, Inc. Avenue ota 55104 4 (FINAL) Water Improvement Project Tian Hills Booster Plant) TOTAL $ 44,334.59 s, there being no nays the motion carried unanimously, to ap, rove the ibllowing licenses; bys John J. Kostka RENEWAL Co., Inc. North bys Loren Larson NEW VU. North bys R. W. Bowler NEW by: John E. Mooney RM AL Page 16. Maynard A. ielsen for: FRIDLEY V.F.W. P06T 363 4655 - 2-1 Street N. E. 1040 Osborne Road N. E. Fridley 21 Minnesota Fridley 32, Minnesota License Fees $12.00 Paid Seconded b5 Upon a voice vote, there being no nags' the motion carried coal=. CuNSI ER ?sT N OF ORDIRANCE As'� PTE WING CHAR , Motion by fight' seconded by Sheridan to table the above Ordinance. Upon a voice vote there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. ;��..'� e�rr� zx,lstu, cis. ntvu re�zavau� ua, — u rr�suti Motion by kham to receive the yearly. report of the Fire Department and to authorize a payroll according to the schedule sub.,Atted by the Fire Chief, Seconded Sheridan. upon a voice vote,.there being no nays, the motion carried usly. IO Bn MFN s Motion by kham to approve the fol - owing appointmentes NAMES Union 4�L. FiEi'_ LA, S Deanna.Jawi Friselle. Accounting $272.00 Marquerlte 5701 CentAl Avenue Clerk Per 2iegle�t Fridley, X sota 554.21 Month Shirley A Haapala Clerk -Steno $272.00 NOW 2416 - 103 Lane N.W. Per Position Coon Rapid . Minnesota Month Robert H$ '7331 OWL Fridley, Seconded KI se N.E. Patrolman tk77.00 NOW esota 5544 Per Position Month Tho::,pson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nave, the motion curried • • Page 17 Mayor Nee p rented the l,la ue to M%rvin Brunscllp the City Clerk, and st ^.ted that the C cil was proud of the improvement in education and training undertaken the City Clerk, and the Mayor was happy to present to the City Clerk the p ue sent to him by the Internatiorol My 'Managers Association upon completion the course in Municipal Finance Administration. Motion by S ridan to concur in the appointment of Art Olson and Leroy Blomster as Assistant Fire Chiefs. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, ti motion carried unanimously. The City Mar, ger explained that the Resolution would order final plans and specificatic s for completion of three drift wells in the City tda.ter eystem. Motion by S ridan to adopt Resolution Pty 1[4+659 Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, here being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. The City Ile, in wages fo: 9 cents per stores, but Motion by W: voice vote, Motion by Sl Thompson. 1 unanimously SERV.�= Motion by a voice vo N ger explained that the proposed wage schedule would be an increase the City municipal off -sale liquor employees. Their wages would be our less than the wages paid to employees of private off -sale liquor ould be higher than that of most other municipalities in the area. ght to adopt Resolution No. X496s& Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a here being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. an to approve and adopt Resolution No. 16 -19650 Seconded by a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried ht to adopt Resolution No. 17 -1965. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon there being no nays., the motion carried unanimously. Mayor Nee s ted that the Minnesota League of Municipalities had a suggested specificati for the letting of bids for the purchase of liquid chlorine. He suggested t the administraticn might wish to include the provisions of the Minnesota gue of Municipalities specifications in the specifications _prepared by the Citr the letting of bids for liquid chlorine. Motion by harid to adopt �1,. lution No. 18-1965. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no the motion carried »?+animously. Page 18. • Potion by z4mpson to adopt Resolution No. 19 -1965. Seconded by Sheridan, Upon a voiceilvote, there being no nays the motion carried unanimouslyb Motion by Wx ght toadopt Resolution No. 20 -1965. Seconded by Sheridan* Upon a voice vo there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously, RES4LUTIi:N 21- 1965 (,RD RIiVG CAjJqDEt,2JATJON - ZiSA 307, 311, & ST The City Ma4ger stated that the City was in the process of negotiation with the props owners and wished to be ready to institute condemnation proceedings, if such p edin...•s became necessary. Motion by Sheridan to dopt Resolution No* 21 -1965. S onded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, :here being no nays, the motion ca unanimously. A letter f the Chamber of Comrrerce asi4ng to assist with Final plans for the new City H was presented to the Council. Motion by Sheridan, seconded by Wright, tha the letter be received. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion cried unanimously. Potion by W ght that the firm of Hodne Associates, Architects/Planners, be tentatively elected for the ,urpose of undertaking the programming and the estimating the costs of designing a comprehensive plan for the City of Fridley in eomplian with the requirements for obtaining Federal Aid under the provisions of the 701 t of the Housing and Home Finance Administr�ition as required by the Sta of Minnesota. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no na , the motion carried unani_::ously, A THORI T EENI AGE C OF CUNSTLLTANT ON A CJL BASISt Motion by S ridan to approve the schedule of Per Diem Fees provided by the Planning Co ultant, Hodne Associates, as liven in the schedule furnished to the City and to appoint the firm of Hodne Associates as planning consultants to assist t Planning Commission upon request of the Planning Commission, the appointment be effective imi- ediately for an indefinite time. Seconded by Thompson. :on a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. NUTICE 0 All FJR I i. Ns Motion by ridan to receive the Notice of Claim for Injury filed by Larry Nelson ag t the City. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, motion carried unanimously. Is r-1 L---A There bei meeting of Raymond E. Secretary Page 190 no further business, Mayor NRR declared the regular Council tnuary 18, 1965 adjourned* submitted: the Council MY OF r s►Uaaai = CITY CaUHM TO WHO XT W COMM: Lice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the Ci Council of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 Univers Avenue M.B., on February It 1965 in the Council Chamber at 8t00 P. , for the purpose oft ideretion of the final plat (P.S. #62 -10) Park, Mike Hafner, the same being Lot 49 tow's Subdivision No. 77, all of the Northwest uarte�c (Wt) of the Northwest Quarter (NW%) of ection 119 lying South of the centerline of borne Road and West of State Highway No. 47 varsity Avenue), also, all of the Southwest . ex (=%) of the Northmest Quarter (NWT) f $ection il, lying West of State 83,gitway Mo. 47, Il lying in the North Half (N4) of Sections 10 11, T -301 8 -240 Anoka Couatq, State of one desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter #11 be heard at this meeting. Ja msery 20, 1965 Jamry 27, 1965 I 0 WILLIAM J. N88 Mayor 4O Nels C. Anderson Lawrence E. Benson Charles M. Denny Robert M. Anderson Ralph F. Anderson J. Leonard Larson Neil C. Selvig Richard L. Schillinger Arthur C. Goess City Counci City of Fri 6431 Univer Fridley, Mi Gentlemen: ley ity Avenue nesota Tebipbeee F WMI 24M INSURANCE 313 MINNESOTA FEDERAL BUILDING • 607 MARQUETTE AVENUE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 86402 January 28, 1965 Re: Group, Hospital & Life The insuran a advisory committee-has made a thorough study and analysis of group plans offered by various insurance companies. This study included cost of benefits, type of benefits, and service facilities 1hat could be provided. Perhaps a listing of present coverages ii. in order. They are as follows: Life insurance Dail Room Benefit Misc llaneous Hospital Expense Surg cal Schedule Doct r Calls in Hospital Supp emental Accident Benefit Out- atient Expense Benefit Diag ostic X -Ray & Laboratory Mate nity (Hospital) Mate nity (Doctor) Majo4 Medical Expense 19000.00 20.00 for 70 days 400.00 400.00 5.00 for 70 days 300.00 100.00 25.00 200.00 100.00 109000.00 with $100 Deductible and 80% of excess The quotes rom the various companies were on the same basis as the present cov rage. After due deliberation it is the recommendation of the insu 1he ance advisory committee that the city group be under- written by Aetna Life Insurance Company. At this poi changes and the present there is a the present Another ver If a person . limited to Aetna progr which in th t, I would like to make mention of certain benefit improvements in the program. Under the surgical schedule, carrier has a $400 maximum whereas under the new program, 420 maximum. Such things as normal delivery which under program is $100 will now become $105. significant change is under the Major Medical program. is in a private room, under the present program they are L maximum of $20 per day for this expense. Under the Lm, a person is limited to the average semi - private charge .s area is anywhere from $26.50 to $29.50 a day. This (continued) .460.4 Page 2 City of Fri means that Aetna progr present pro 0 FJ January 28, 1965 Iley �s far as the Major Medical expense is'concerned, the �m will allow an individual $6.50 to $9.50 a day over the ;ram. One other d fference under the Major Medical is thqt under the present car ierts program, the deductible must be accumulated in a 90 day peri d. Under the Aetna program, the accumulation can be made over tie full calendar year. 22 Costs were also a factor in our decision. They were as follows: Employee Cost Dependents Cost Total Cost Aet a Life Ins. Co. $8.93 .8 26-76' Pies ern Life Ins. Co. 12.00 16.65 28.65 Other compa ies submitting quotes were between the premium of $26.76 and a high uote of $29.17. Another imp various ins efficient, confirmatio writer of g the nation number of c It is the Ir of the abov( the Group it Company eff( RLS:cjw rtant consideration was the service facilities of the rance companies. The Aetna has a large, well staffed, ocal claims office which is of primary importance. A of this fact is that the Aetna is the largest under - oup plans in the state of Minnesota and ranks second in ith annual group remiums of $413,0009000 and first in ses underwritten 22,154). urance Advisory Committee's recommendation that because costs, benefits and service that will be provided, that urance coverages be placed with the Aetna Life Insurance tive either February 1 or March 1, 1965. Very truly yours, Richard, L. Schilling , Chairman Insurance Advisory Committee ✓ ✓ • 23 11 (n N3 V) N cf- cn 1—i C/I C+ --4 PV 0-3 Ctrl • 009 co • s-3 S, C=. 0 �- 0 0 .0. r Ca r'l 9 r ca F" 0 0 Ell 10 CD m • bo (D 00 C) C) 00 0 8 0 88 0 0 ``F,3 0 0 Ca C� --c 5 r 0 0 0 0 , a • O Ca ism CD t:1 04 m CJ 0 lQg 0 CD O .ill. logo 4414* <4A 4,P,. 10 to O 0 0 0 Co. im. —3 M va Sao ✓ ✓ • 23 11 E `'Q • 11 31 v--. e is 5r7 �iO � ul 214 SIN \�On 10 Q 0 :3 cn CD 5-q CIO DO -T- ��) al q3 1 C) � t4 IC-14 a GA 0 0 oil 00 Ctzi 0 S 0 0 EG Cz c5 c C, 0 0 p., cj of il , d It 11 31 v--. e is 5r7 �iO � ul 214 SIN i - 11 a rD r J e- 'C3 i7 !T ?e� h 4 �L •O c a� Y� {;ur1 �S -1 kh �� ' z- C, t,;� '.M r� h� P �`� } -w Q J M J 1, p CO S� Q t- ,•J l : f• +9 .� to CD i o cm 0 1 o C.� ( `jy� tl I t� i 0 V t-j - 1 ,. x,1 «+ i- •3 $3° 443 O G U O q O O O �i f V) NO WSJ Yt.' t U O O t' � t rY Q'• v t RO � 9 0 t- C'✓ l` sm r � CX Q1 o b j o 4 P. � g ii • , ` s � � �v 8 {yy1 ypR� a t'� /r�`z. ��'.,y a t � Y - 'r-7 . \w �` �Ft _ 1 �tI' 'lO �i Jai off .a� � , p "1'i V _ 9 f i cY V i h ;. ii }j a0 ♦ (j�� �oA{O 0 6-3 O- ° - V c) C Cr <) K �.�,g Jl 'lam `J'd �rti'd -CA V�- K`mo w i=j V k i ° o Fo �' `o au •u o �o e a z - 11 a rD r J e- 'C3 i7 !T ?e� h 4 �L •O c a� Y� {;ur1 �S -1 kh �� 0 • to -.� 33 4D Op C) Cp C) CD Q 0 n C) CD 0 C-) 0 0 C:) C) 0 0 0 C) L4 -ey fA Cil Ca. to V2 Ir r) rr tb r2- CA CQ iD cr IN ca D 0 0--i C: M 0 C-0 w > qLn a Ij 01 C f C i7 -91 -.� 33 4D Op C) Cp C) CD Q 0 n C) CD 0 C-) 0 0 C:) C) 0 0 0 C) L4 -ey fA to CO g I -, Ia. m PA N k" Ca. to t,*5 CQ iD cr IN ca D 0 0--i C: M 0 C-0 w > Ij k7):, i:4 Mr 1r tj rr 9.n to CO g I -, Ia. m PA N k" • C Five Ways To Discourage Identical Bids 1. When identical low bids include the cost of delivery, award the con- tract to the bidder farest away. 2. Award the contract to the ident- ical bidder who received the award in the proceding procurement. Con - tine to award all contracts to the same bidder as long as all low bids remain identical. 3. Empower procurement officers to reject all identical bids and utilize negotiated procurement. 4. Where identical bids by dealers and distributors arise from the exer- cise of resale control by the manu- facturer, afford dealers and distri- butors greater opportunities for price competition by combining within one invitation both price- maintained and non -price- maintained items. 5. In the procurement of office and related equipment through dealers whose resale prices are frequently r controlled by the manufacturer, re- quire the bidding to make allowances for old equipment turned in as part of the transaction. The 432 page report entitled, "Ident- ical Bidding in Public Procurement" is available from the Superintendent of Documents. Washington 25, D. C. L: i e j z 0 FRIDLEY SA ET41 COK,1ITTEE MEETING 1,111, OTES — JANUARY 200 1965 The committee��dispensed with the reading of the minutes of the last meeting, and Chairman Lars declared the minutes approved. It was repo that the ;.post office collection boxes at East River Road and Mississippi, st River Road and Osborne Road, and Mississippi and VanBuren Street, would be mov back by the post office department in the near future. NEW BUSINESS: • It was rep in the str Larson sta Motion by recomr..enda has compl.e A letter was traffic on E of interchan reported tha Highway Depa Paul Barrow, results of t the motion c The Fridley engineering because the d that several complaints of bad spots at various places of Fridley had been made to the various members of the committee. Chairman that he would refer the complaints to the Public Works Department, z, seconded by Weiss, that the committee take no action to make a relative to the new snow tires until the State highway Department ita tests. Chairman Larson declared the motion carried. ead to the committee in which a complaint was made that the Southbound t River Road found it nearly impossible to gain access to the portion that penaits a driver to go West on Highway 100. Sgt. iitz the 1,roblem is being studied and will be rectified by the State ment. Motion by Fritz, seconded by Bandel, that the letter from Mr. owning Box Co_pany, be received, but that no action be taken pending action by the State Highway D.:partment. Chairman Larson declared Tied, ty Committee is :cost unhappy and critical with parts of the planning of the Interchange at Highway 100 and East River Road, ittee feels that it presents many safety hazards. "28 Th►s meeting i i Members Present: 9,s called to Larson, order by Chairman Larson at Bandel, Szegda.. Fritz, Oden, 8:00 P.M. Weiss, Rossing The committee��dispensed with the reading of the minutes of the last meeting, and Chairman Lars declared the minutes approved. It was repo that the ;.post office collection boxes at East River Road and Mississippi, st River Road and Osborne Road, and Mississippi and VanBuren Street, would be mov back by the post office department in the near future. NEW BUSINESS: • It was rep in the str Larson sta Motion by recomr..enda has compl.e A letter was traffic on E of interchan reported tha Highway Depa Paul Barrow, results of t the motion c The Fridley engineering because the d that several complaints of bad spots at various places of Fridley had been made to the various members of the committee. Chairman that he would refer the complaints to the Public Works Department, z, seconded by Weiss, that the committee take no action to make a relative to the new snow tires until the State highway Department ita tests. Chairman Larson declared the motion carried. ead to the committee in which a complaint was made that the Southbound t River Road found it nearly impossible to gain access to the portion that penaits a driver to go West on Highway 100. Sgt. iitz the 1,roblem is being studied and will be rectified by the State ment. Motion by Fritz, seconded by Bandel, that the letter from Mr. owning Box Co_pany, be received, but that no action be taken pending action by the State Highway D.:partment. Chairman Larson declared Tied, ty Committee is :cost unhappy and critical with parts of the planning of the Interchange at Highway 100 and East River Road, ittee feels that it presents many safety hazards. "28 ?R.LDI.L1 SAFETI 10011.ITTEv ;wEMNG ;:Ii.UT:.a" -. JAieuhRY 200 1965 U Page 2,.,,,.* Chairman Larm to this openii i1iL:, T iiEETINC : The next meet: February 3, 1� AJJUURNMENT: Motion by Rom Chairman Larsg Resl�ectfully Deloris Bandel Secretary to t: 0 stated that he would check with the Highway Department relative will be held at the Fridley City Hall at 0400 P.tf., Wednesday, , seconded by Fritz, that the meeting be adjourneAo eclared the meeting adjourned* .tted: Committee 2 r� • January 19, 1965 Mr. Ea City o 6431 U Fridle Wagner, City Manager Fridley versity Avenue N. E. Minnesota 55421 Dear Eaitl: This le ter is to inform you that I do not choose to accept the appoin ent to the Parks and Playgrounds Sub - Committee. I have given is very serious thought and have decided that it is probably best f everyone concerned that I do not continue in this position. . I have njoyed the six years I have put in on the committee as well as the ork I did on the City Hall Proposal. I hope that my time and of its have been of benefit to the city. JAS : j v Sinc rely yo S, l John A. Swanson i 0 I• • J=U=IY �roa a court Ah& • Is 1955 of: Auditor To -,LVMM, J�Ity and village Clerks: . ko c -e losing a certified copy of the .,mutes of the Cou>>ty Board reciting a payment of bouatitu for the year 1965. Tha t of the gopher bounty is different this year• as there.is a prow, in the county's authorisation to reimburse, bases on the local to ., city or village to,pV a lilts amount of 100 or more to th indi dual eliglbile, or else the County cannot reimburse. In ordcrr that the Auditor's office gill know which tova, city or v1I3P coo will xatch at least the 100, so that ve pay reimburse the town, city or 111iiev., you are required to provide this office with a state- rent or solution of your board of the s:aount that you are paying at tLo loca level. If any town, city or village wishes to pay more than the 100, that is up to your own. local authorities. The ^ regulations still exist that all gopher bounty al-Im for re- irlurz= mt must be made within the current year, and that all requests wvs: to n the Auditor's office for the year 1965 not later than Deoo- 3 �. 965 • on the Yphar bait the County will furnish through the County Agent's office bait at the cost that the County has `o pay. Vcry yours, �� A I Y / K4 th . Arsoaa anty Auditor kvc /1e1 Ibis. 0 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: January 29, 1965 M E M 0 1,P. Wagner, City Manager vin C. Brunsell, Finance Director tary Sewer Main Assessment - Plat of Commerce Park Addition he final plat of Commerce Park Addition is ready for Council approval. en the final approval is given to this plat and the plat is filed in ka, we will probably be receiving inquiries as to the amount of special ssessments on the individual lots. p to this time there has been no sanitary sewer main assessment levied on tiis plat, with the exception of the $.25 assessment levied back in 1956. lie plat of Commerce Park lies within one of the two areas in Fridley wh h have not been assessed for the sanitary sewer main service, presumably )ecause there will have to be additional sanitary sewer mains installed.', The plat of Commerce Park Addition lies within the area bounded by he railroad tracks on the west, the north boundary of Fridley on the nor' , University Avenue on the east, and 69th Avenue on the south. This entir' area will, as I understand it, need additional sanitary sewer main facil ies in the future. am bringing this to your attention at this time so that the Council co d possibly consider the servicing of this area at this time or could a ablish some type of a policy as to what will be done in the future so t we will have some basis on which to proceed in telling the people hat the future assessments in this area might be. 22 • • • City Cou City of 6431 Uni Minnespo Attenti GentlemeA City of location of the N to reque District ANDREW G. KOHLAN Attorney and Counselor at Law 726 MIDLAND BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS 1, MINNESOTA FEDERAL 9.4675 January 28, 1965 :il ity Avenue N.E. 32, Minnesota Mr. Earl P. Wagner City Manager .With respect to our previous comunication made to the -idley relative to the use of any available city property for the ,nd construction of the sanitary sewer interceptor across Fridley th Suburban Sanitary Sewer District, I am authorized and directed the City of Fridley to grant the necessary easements to the Sewer as are necessary to our Project 1L. The line will run from University Avenue Eastward along the Nortlarly edge of the park property and then along the Southerly edge of the Manesots. Transfer Railway right -of -way. Your engineer is cognizant of the proposed location. Will you authcrize and direct your attorney to prepare the necessary instruments to provift the easements desired by the District. Yours truly, Andrew G. Kohlan By Direction. Carol Lean AGK/cl e fit ILA txs dal a Pidblia vtiliti" iaoa �" 7111 gnraodh 7140 34 0 TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL - FEBRUARY 1, 1965 F. D. apMan Construction Company 2809 Al Avenue Minnea lis s !linnOSOta 55416 E itaate No. 1 (Partial) - Sanitasy sewer an4 * or IxV coveaaa mt Project No. 70 (Riverview T ace, south of Mississippi PlaCGI LiM0ln ( ton) street, south of Ironton Street= 5th 3 eaxt, south of T.H. #100 Johnscol Bros. Highway & Heavy Constructoacas Inc. P.O. SCIC 1002 Litehf +Cis KiAAesoti mate No. 3 (Partial) - St0CM Sourer DVSM nt Project No. 5-B (North of T.H. east of T.H. #47) i No. 2 (Partial) - water iWovamaat No* 34-0 (Crossing - T.H. #694 - Street, 7th Street) $ 8,979.61 $ 2,390.94 $ 4,032.90 $ 15,403.45 3 ri • n U • RS' LICENSES TO BE APPROVED BY CMNC31 1, 1965 iman Outdoor Advertising Co. North Washington Avenue eapolis, Minnesota 55401 estic Heating Company, Inc. 0 Grand Avenue South meapolis, Minnesota vatic Heating Company, Inc. 0 Grand Avenue South neapolis, Minnesota H. C. Olson Plumbing Company 5 2 s 49th Avenue North stal, Minnesota t mn Outdoor Advertising Co. North Washington Avenue "polls, Minnesota 55401 by: Sohn P. Millard by: Hartley Bruder by; Hartley Bruder bye Hobert Olson by: Gerald Kaufman RBW aw 26 t �) 'i 0 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this 1st day of February, 1965, by and betwetn the.City of Fridley, hereinafter designated as City, and Sandstron & Haffner, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, hereinafter known as the contract , and Comstock & Davis, Inc., hereinafter known as the consulting engineer, WHEREAS, the City of Fridley let contracts for the construction of a sanitary ewer line on 73rd Avenue Noitheast under City of Fridley known as Projects S Number 24A and 24B and WHEREAS, said projects were designed by Comstock & Davis, Inc. as consulti engineers for the City of Fridley, and WHEREAS, the contracts were let to Sandstrom & Haffner, Inc. as contract s and that said contractor gave to the City certain surety performance bonds as equired by the projects, and WHEREAS, said contracts called and required inspection by the con- sulting ngineers and called for supervision of the work of the contractor by the said lonsulting engineers, and WHEREAS, the contracts required for a one year's maintenance bond to continue after the completion of the contracts, and WHEREAS, during the running of the-one year maintenance bond period, certain liroblems arose that required various repairs and alterations to the sewer line and WHEREAS, the city before, the running of the one year maintenance bond period gave written notice to the contractor and to its surety and to the consulti engineers that there were problems and defects in the sewer line 12C 3 • K] installedl remedy and nd that the sewer line be put in good condition, and HEREAS, the contractor from time to time has made an attempt to defects and did cooperate with the City in making necessary repairs WHEREAS, the said consulting engineer has claimed that it did maintain roper supervision and inspection and that the defects were beyond its antic pation and control, and WHEREAS, the said contractor claims that its work was done in full compliant with its contract with the City and that it has not failed to comply wi h all the requirements of the contract, and WHEREAS, the City of Fridley, in order to determine the fault and responsib lity, employed an outside firm of consulting engineers namely the Howard R. Green Company of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, who under date of March 19, 1964, did make and file its report with the City of Fridley and that report concludes with a finding that both the consulting engineers and the contractors should be responsible for the expense involved in making the alterations and repair to the City of Fridley, which conclusion is denied by the Contractor and the E gineer, and WHEREAS, subsequent to the receipt of the said report from Green and Associates, the City Engineer of the City of-Fridley by memo 64 -35 and 64 -34, has estimated the City's total cost incurred in connection with the repair and alterLtion. to these projects amounts to the.total.sum of Fourteen thousand four hun ed seventy -two and 39/100($14,472.39) Dollars, and WHEREAS, it appears that some portion of the total cost incurred by the City irould reasonably have been incurred for normal.inspection and maintenance to the pr ject, and -2- L� • I• one nun study ai of Frid the Cit fees du connect which w the fur Dollars period paid, a Holiday the Eng six 69th plat the have s s aid u Six WHEREAS, the city has incurred the additional expense of Two thousand d and no /100 ($2,100.00) Dollars to Green and Associates for their recommendations and WHEREAS, Comstock & Davis, Inc. have various claims against the City y for professional engineering services which have been delivered to by letters of October 19, 1964 and January 21, 1965 involving the of Five thousand one hundred one and 34/100($5,101.34) Dollars in in with work performed for the City involving Trunk Highway Number 694 k commenced in the early part of 1960 and was completed in 1964 and Ler sum of One thousand six hundred sixty -eight and no /100 ($1,668.00) .n fees for services performed as Fridley City Engineer during the August 15, 1960 to August 31, 1960 'and for which they have not been WHEREAS, the contractor in connection with a subdivision known as Hills developed by E and M Development Company in conjunction with neer incurred a total expense of Seventeen thousand two hundred twenty - 35/100 ($17,226.35) Dollars for the construction and improvement of nue in said plat; that said street was constructed pursuant to the ordinances of the City; that the City has park property located along h side of said street for a distance of 1, 175 feet; and that the said � street and the lateral water and sewer lines installed in said street ie value to the city for park purposes and for future development of k; and that it has a total replacement value to the City in excess of sand nine hundred and no /100 ($6,900.00) Dollars. -3- 3, U I• 40 NOW THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and betweenl: the parties that in order to settle the dispute now existing between them as to responsibility and liability for the said sewer line on 73rd Avenue•Northeast, as follows; 1. That the City accept acknowledgement of payment by Comstock & Davis, Iir.. for the two engineering bills of Five thousand one hundred one and 34/1 ($5,101.34) Dollars and One thousand six hundred sixty -eight and no /100 ( 668.00) Dollars respectively for a total of Six thousand six hundred sixty-nit and 39/100 ($6,669.39) Dollars as satisfactory payment and discharge of any rosponsibility or liability whatsoever that said consulting engineers may have had in connection with its work on the 73rd Avenue'sewer, being a part of Projects SS Number 24A and 24B. 2. That Sandstrom & Haffner, Inc., one of the developers of Holiday Hills wa a and renounce any claim that it or the developer might have for reimburstment by the City of Fridley for the improvement of 69th Avenue, including the instillation of any water and sewer laterals. 3. That the City of Fridley forthwith furnish to the contractor written lotice of the acceptance by it of the work performed under SS Project 24A and B and the completion of the maintenance period and that the sureties may stan fully released and discharged from any obligation under said contracts. AGREED to at Fridley, Minnesota, this lst day of February, 1965. -4- 0 9 BE ta a cl_liz- i 0;1. L " 1 i- th--. of `11`czt1- cf '--&Z, 17 .-3 T3 0 C CT 4J 2 o� mfn- 7.t cv�?c-s- na I'l I Lu r t 0 12`2 "1 L L -ii-'.` 0 fL '3, - t GL 0 :.e has ;8 1-limac-as-Ion of -1113.20L feet G c line u, -1 ot one has t', a ddl-a�ansion T'lle "CILd plat- is cor-.?eated in -.L`ojjcu1'iig particulars, �OU-Ll- c-2 a�ticjt- c! the dzI"_�,Z=--'Lon Of 1he Als-1- ljra of cutict- or,-, -",-.ou-*!,-,7. have the d.;-rimsion. of 1157.S5 16, 3-964 Sir--veycr ',',To. 3626 C;-'2, M-i-nnasota c,t4fica-c of to Vha p-at 0-F,Coch-an's The z 1 bave L L. - -�L - , - -L - s» CiiY 12.3 bea-a anrz�cveel, by Faidbcy, Minnesota, r a G f or, `�-a day of Clerk The Hi:::v:! c-,.--nmficatc GIL coz-.-cctinn c--2' the p*-"-a-L of Ccchran's alf. �iit- ion I -:L s an, —. -is 2 Z Y cht--ciczal and Pmoka L.0 --c"Ys. CENTS-P,LINE RIC`' CR- M P-OiN 42 0 Ll LOT 8 /s ,*3DIV[510N - -- -327.53 - - -- A LtHe PARALLEL rO M CENTIERUME OIL RICE CRC-C-K ROAD --- 327.69 N88'39'w--- 147 i 2 to Ln fn 11 ff 655.06 N '36d--39-W Un 0 ee co ui LA 6 V71LTV C-A 2- m e 14 r 66.0 00.15 0.6.0 5 ----- -- Soft 3z7.58- -- A LINE PAPALLE OF pltu CREEK M rA— UMMAL koAD of is 1 19 1 1 0 Ll LOT 8 /s ,*3DIV[510N - -- -327.53 - - -- A LtHe PARALLEL rO M CENTIERUME OIL RICE CRC-C-K ROAD --- 327.69 N88'39'w--- 147 i 2 to Ln fn 11 ff Cf Un 0 ee 14.7.0 ; f, N i I 10 ,,f-6*UT[UTY EASEMENT II r 0 b, AVr, N I i z 7�. 747- 6- EAST UN'! J 0 0 S. AINB JUl I :> E.OAVIS I:NOLO LYONS CHARLES H. -PERN SIDNEY S.FEiNBERG HARDING A.ORREN KENNETH E.TILSEN ROGER T. SAMR OEAN K.JO"NSON BERNARD ROSENBERG THOMAS D. FEfN8ERG ARNOLD M. BELLIS JAMES A. KAR IGAN PAUL W. UREIANEK LAWRENCE ZELLE ROBERTJ.TWEEDY PAUL KUNERT it ILL $. KAPLAN DANIEL JACOBOWSKI JOHN D. RICE W ILTON E. GERVAIS STANLEY E.KARON HOWARD A. PATRICK JAMES L.FETTERLY. NORMAN K.GURSTEL JOHN L.TAMBORNINO DENNIB W.STRID JQMN T. CNAPMAN ROBERT C.BUELL DAVID J. LAR SON GEORGE LATIMER W M.C.MO RTE N9 EN JOHN M. SANDS JOHN F.EISBERO MARVIN S.FREEDMAN SIDNEY KAPLAN KENNETH J. WEIL ROBERT^ LEVY Mr. E City M City of 8431 U Minne� Dear To ve the lic reach Local LAW OFFICES ROBINS, DAVIS & LYONS MINNESOTA BUILDING SAINT PAUL 55101 TELEPHONE 224 -8684 January 25, 1965 1 Pi. Wagner, ta.zer sity Avenue , Minnesota 4 `3 MINNEAPOLIS RAND TOWER WASHINGTON, D. C. 918 CONNECTICUT AVE.N.W. Re: Liquor Store Employees Our File 563 -8017 'r. Wagner: iy y recent telephone conversation with you, please be advised that nor store employees have approved the new rates and settlement terms i during negotiations with you and their union representatives, the 'oint Executive Board of Hotel & Restaurant Employees and Bartenders tional Union, Locals 152, 458 & 665. Upon pro val of the settlement terms by the City Council, we will appreciate being dvised by you of same, and further receiving from you any new or amend ad ordinances or resolutions incorporating same. Furth r, I'wish to apologize for your not receiving this letter earlier. I had thoug I had dictated a letter on this to you so you would have received it in suf cient time for the January 18 meeting of the Council. However, upon being' dvised today that you have not received such a letter, I am sending this t you immediately. Sincerely, ROBINS, �pAVI8 Am LYONS el G J owski 7m cc: Carroll Melloy Fay Frawley Ray Wright • 0 A RSSOLDTij D2TION8 L101 SMSOURIM Noe E IBS =SOLUTI= 04-1964 ENTITLED "S NORKIm WAMS ADD HOOKS Fm EMF'LOMS EMBLOM BY T8E JK=CIPAL III Minneapolis Local Joint Facecutive Board of the Hotel Restaurant loyeeS and Bartenders International Union, A.F.L. - 00I.00, Unions Mo. 152 and No. 4580 as bargaining representatives of the eigp oyes of the Municipal Liquor Store of the City of Fridley, has pr to the Council of the City of Fridley, a resolution relating t the vorking conditions, wages and hours for wVloyees of the Tunic Liquor Store of the City of Fridley, and ff �►rtiele XII, Wage Scale of said Resolution #4.1964 is effective January 10 165, and 103 , it is necessary at this time to establish a wage scale far "VI Toyed by the ftfticipal Liquor Store for the period January 1, 1965 to January 18 1966. bw e ' Fridley, t amended to Effec hours per, Dollars pe per week a Dollars pe 20/100 ($2 of eight ( per week 4 short hour per hour. THIS ATTEST: Marvin C. 'ORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of title XII of Resolution #4 -1964 be, and it is hereby, as follows, to -wit: ive '', january 1, 1965, all bartenders working forty (40) sek Mall receive One Hundred Six and no /100 ($106.00) week. All bartenders working forty -sight (48) hours nll receive One Hundred Thirty -five and 20 /100 ($135020) week. All extra s shall receive Twenty -one and 020) Dollars for work donne on -a working day which consists ) working hours. All waitresses working forty (40) hours all receive Sixty -two and no /100 ($62.00) Dollars= all waitresses shall bO paid One and 75/100 ($1.75) Dollars AM ADOPTED BY = CITr COUNCIL OF TRE CITY OF FRIDLSY DAY of , 19650 0 CITY CLERK William J. Nee, MAYOR 44 0 0 1] RESOLUTION NO. RESOLtMS1 ORDERING neRWE WT AND FINAL MANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE OF C06TS THEREOF: S'1`BEST DMOVE WT PROJECT ST. 1965 -1 Resolution No. 13 -1965 of the City Council adopted the 4th day of J A 1965, set the date for hearing on the proposed improvements, as spec cally noted in the Notice of hearing attached hereto for reference as Exhibi "A ". and WMMLUv all of the property owners whose property is liable to be assessed ith the making of these improvements (as noted in said notice) were giv ten (10) days notice by mail and published notice of the Council Hearing rough two (2) weekly publications of the required notice, and the hearing s held and the property owners heard thereon at the hearing, as noted in aid notice. NSW, T FORB, BE IT RESOLVED, By the Council of the City of Fridley, ls�t County, Minnesota, as follows: That the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution No. 13 -1965 are hereby ordered to be effected and completed as soon as reasonably possible, to -wit: a) The improvements as noted under the Construction item A in the Notice of Hearing (in Exhibit "A") for the following streets: Thirty foot 03013 Pavement Brookview Dr.s 68th Ave. so. to Existing Blacktop 59th Ave.: 4th St. to 7th St. 60th Ave.: University Ave. to 4th St. Riverview Terns 71st Way to North Bad of Riverwood Manor 75th Ave.: 5th St. to Lyric Lane Polk St.s Hackmann Ave. to Lynde Drive 54th Ave.: 5th St. to 7th St. Thirty -six foot MI) Pavement 76th Ave.: Central Ave. to Arthur St. Ulysses St.: 76th Ave. to Bacon St. Bacon St.,: Osborne Road to 76th Ave. Fireside Drive: Central Ave. to Hayes St. Hayes St.: 75th Ave. to Fireside Drive Lakeside Road: Onondaga to 75th Ave. McKinley St.: Onondaga to 75th Ave. Fillmore St.: South Edge of Lyndale Bldrs. 6th Add. to Regis Lane Regis Lane; Fillmore St. to West Bdge of Parkview Oaks 71st Way: East River Road to Riverview Terrace Riverview Terrace: 63t Way to Mississippi Place 64th Ave.: University Ave. to 5th St. 59th Ave.: 7th St. to Jefferson St. 45 Rosolutpn No. St. 1965-1 0 Monroe St.: 58th Ave. to 59th Ave. 58th Ave.: Quincy St. to Madison St. Madison St.: Bela ne Place to 58th Ave. 7xonton St.: East Edge of Serwall Addition to Railroad Tracks Ashton Ave.: Ironton to 79th Way Page 2 That the work above =W be consolidated with otbar areas as one improvement. 2. The work to be performed under this project may be performed under one or more contracts as may be deemed advisable upon receipt of bids. I3. The City Engineer is hereby designated as the Engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare final plans and specifi- cations for the making of such impravesnent. ADOPTED SY ZM COUMIL OF = CITY OF FBI [ TBISr DAY OFD_ 1965. F_ -I LJ -i nasv= c. U MWOR • Willibm J. Nee �? F ) • RBSOU M Junior Co] and WF Junior Co] and IN a willingx NC Fridley: 1. 7 2. 1 I 3. 1 4r RESOLUTIOW NO. RELATING TO LOCATION OF JUNIOR COWAG$ IN ANOKA COUNTY 3, the State Junior College Board has indicated that a will be located in the southern portion of Anoka County, s, it is customary for the governmental entity in whicfA a is located to donate the land necessary for such college, REA$, the Anoka County Board of Commissioners has vgxmssed on to undertake the responsibility of acquiring said land, .'THMPORE, BE IT RBSOLVED, by the Council of the City of at the Anoka County Board proceed to acquire the necessary nd for a Junior College site. at the site be acquired, within the area of Anoka County stewed and suggested by the Junior College Board. acquisition of the land be financed by a County -wide levy. 4. t the land that is acquired be donated on behalf of the sidents of Anoka County to the Minnesota Junior College B do S. t the City Clerk forward two certified copies of this olution to the Anoka County Board. BY ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 1965 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. • ATTEST: I� William J. Nee, MAYOR Marvin C. WW*ll, CITY CLERK r� LJ n U A NOW, That to -w #92, RESOLUTION NO. 1965 DTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL 3NTS ON THE N. 150 • of W4 217' of Lot 8, Auditor's Sub. #92. certain special assessments have been levied with respect to land and said land has subsequently been subdivided. &REFIORE BB IT RESOLVED, as follows: a as easements levied against the following described parcels, The N. 150' of W. 217' of Lot 8, Parcel 620, Auditor's Sub. y and shall be apportioned 4nd divided as follows: Or in ll Parcel Fund Orin 1 it N. 15 " +! W. 21T • of Lot 8 Regular S.A. $ 306.61% Audit 's Sub. #92 SW #48- B(Sewer Lateral) 1, 168.50 SW X48 B(Water Lateral) �, 520. #0 $ 1,995.62 Davis I Parcel A ro proved Fund Ori inalAAmo_nt �. N. 75 of if. 217' of Lot 8 Regular S. A. $ 153.31 Audit •s Sub. X192 SW X48- B(3ewer Lateral) 584.24 SW 148- B(Water Lateral) 260.26 S. 75 ofl,N. 1501 of W. 217' Regular S. A. 153.31 of Loi 8 SW #48- B(Sewer Lateral) 584.26 Aud s Sub. #92 SW #48- B(Water Lateral) 26. $ 1,995.62 BY TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS �,mmmmm,- DAY OF 1965. AT188 I CITY 4 K - Marvin C. Bm MAYOR- Will am J. Nee 48 n �J • • A RESOLUTION ASSF-SSM34TS WHEREAS, cer certain land NOW, T That the asse to -merit: Pare shall be appo (.Q RESOLUTION NO. 1965 THORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF C&TAIN SPECIAL PARCELS 980, 1160, 1400 and 1440, AUDIT0R9S SUB. #22. special assessments have been levied with respect to said land has subsequently been subdivided. BE IT RESOLVED, as follows: levied against the following described parcels, 1, 1160, 1400 and 1440, Auditor's Sub. #22, may and l and divided as follows: Fund Original Amount Part of Lot , Parcel Reg. S. A. (W&S V) $ 319.45 980, Axditorl Sub. #22 W34 (Z:ater Lateral) 636.55 S48B(Sewer Lateral) 1,129.55 Part of Lot 7 Parcel Reg. S.A. (AS M) 1,911.90 1160, Auditor s Sub. #22 W34 (Water Lateral) 3.9116.90 S48B(Sewer Lateral) 5,9530.90 Part of Lot 8 Parcel 1400, Auditor s Sub. #22 Reg. S.A. (W&5 M) 2,932.45 Part of Lot 81 Parcel Reg. S.A. (W&S M) 53k56 1"O,- Audito s Sub. #22 48B (Sewer Lateral) 29,570.70 48B (Water Lateral) 1_41.10. $ 199832.06 Division of FLceiiAprroved 1, Lots 1&2, Fund Reg. S.A. (WO M) Original Amount $ 5,702.36 Lots 1-8, Bilk 2, Lot3, Bilk 3 & WL#34 (Walter Laterals) 39753.45 Outlots 1 48B (Sewer Laterals) 9,231.15 Cochran's tion 48B (Water Laterals) 1.145.10 ITI $ 190832.06 ADOPTED BY CIT!Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRILLEY THIS DAY OF 1965. ATTEST: a- H►a4 Vjj1 v 0 MAYOR - William J. Nee I Z RESOLUTION NO. 1965 A RE5OLUT ON AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF CEhTAIN SPLC�AL S ASSESSriE ON PARCEL 1530, AUDITOR'S SUB. #X AND PARCELS 580, 620 AND 640, SUB. OF LOT 10, AUDITOR'S SUB. #94. WiiEREAS, ertain special assessments have been levied with resiject to certain d and said land has subsequently been subdivided. NOW j, THE CRE BE IT RE:)ULVED, as follows: That the ssessment levied against the following described parcels, to -wit: arced. 1530, Aud. Sub. #94 and Parcels 5804 62U and 640, Sub. of Lot 10, A d. Sub. #94, may and shall be appori,ioned and divided as follows: Oria pamis Imd ��a Parcel 15 O, ', 16 Area Interce to $ 283.05 Auditor' Sub.1#94 Reg. S.A,(S&i 636.28 ss #43 294.80 St 443 29240. ST. #43 71.06 Parcel 58's Sup. of 16 Sewer Lateral 377.89 Lot 100 A d.Sub. #94 16 Area InterceliLor 88.74 Reg. S.A.(W&S M) 146.87 1960 St & SS 1,071.00 Parcel 62 • Lot 10, Ad.Subi is Sub. of #94 16 Sewer Lateral. 16 Area Interceptor 755.78 177.48 293.76 Reg. S.A. (W&S hi) 1960 St & SS 2,142.00 1960 St & SS 642.60 Parcel , Sub. of 16 Sewer Lateral 445.78 Lot 10, d.Sub- #94 16 Area Interceptor 88.74 Reg. S.A. (W&S %:) 146088 1960 st & ss .1-071-iloo -$ 1 1,174.19 D vi ion f Pa el Appmv ed iddition FWA OrirriWa Amour& Lots 1 -6 Oatlot 1, Bak 1, 16 Sewer Lateral & 5 Services $ 19779.45 Hut -Berg 16 Area Interceptor 464.60 Reg. S.A. (W&S M) 863.43 SS #43 294.80 ST #43 (53rd) 23,144.00 ST #43 (Fillmore) 68.00 1960 St & SS. 1960 ST & SS 642' .60 Pt. of Lo 11,,Parcel 16 Area Interceptor 173.41 15302 Aud Sub'* #94 Reg. S.A. (W&S K) 38960.36 St #43 (53rd) • St #43 (Fillmore) 4.19 • ADOPTED I THE! CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS _ DAY OF 1965 ATTEST: Y CLEM$ ,. Marvin C. MAYOR v Wil 1 { a*" J. Nee P ; S -11 i0�1 NO. N 1955 A RESOLUTION A ORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF CEETAIN SPLCIAL ASSESSMENTS ON OTS 1 -12, BLK 10, PARCFJS 1750 AND 1775., LOTS 13,14,15, BLK 10 AND L 16-31, BLK 10, SPRING BROOK PARK ADDITION. WHEMS9 certiaJn special assessments have been levied with respect to certain land ajid said land has subsequently been subdivided. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, as follows: That the asses 'levied against the following described parcels, to-wit: LOTS 319, BLOCK 10, SPRING BROOK PARK ADDITION, may and shall be apportioned an divided as follows: Was Tax Or i nal PiI els'' d Or� nal Amount � �� Delinquent Lots 1 -12, ffih 0 51� 1,3 $ 1,].40.08 Parcels 1750 �' 5 I Rag.S.A.(Sy) 179.14 Spring Brook P Lots 13 -150 10 CW-13 $272.67 Spring Brook .c keg. S.A. (SM) 5.16 Lots 1631, i0 !, sw —l3 964077 Spring Brook P k Reg. S.A. 151.51 21(W&S Laterals & Serv.) _ 5].11,. 7k ..,._+ $ 7,547.24 $277.63 Divisioncf dl Approved Rind OriA44i Amount Recertified Lots 1,7 & 9 -1 Hlk 1 SW 13 $ 1,571.06 Spring Brook P grid Reg. S.A. (SM) 246.78 Lots ' & 8, B1J 1 SW -13 $272.67 5.16 Sprb.g Brook Pi irk 2t�d Reg. S. A. (SM) Lots 3-6 &17v 3 SW -13 533.79 Spring Brook P 2nd Reg. S.A. (SM) 63.87 21(W & S Laterals & Serv.) 5. lu.7A �.._ $ 7,547.24 $277.63 ADOPTED BY THE ITY 'COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIULEY THIS DAY OF 19650 MAYOR - W-= J. Nee ATTEST: CITY CLERK - vin i0. Brunseu 0 FRIDLEY SAFLT1 C0*11TTEE MEETING 141NUTES — JANUARY 203, 1965 Thi; meeting s 7�d to order by Chairman Larson at 8:00 P.M. Members Pres is son, Bandel, Szegda, Fritz, Oden, Weiss, Rossing 0 The comwit dispensed with the reading of the minutes of the last meeting, and Chaluxlman n' declared the minutes approved. OLD R!LAINESSt. It was repo !' t the ;cost office collection boxes at East River Road and Mississippi, st River Road and Osborne Road, and Mississippi and VanBuren Street, would be mov �'�,ba by the post office department in the near future. It was repor in the stree, Larson state K,. SNOW TIA Motion by For recomrrendatt has complete A letter was traffic on E of interchan reported tha Highway Depa Paul Barrow, results of t the motion c The Fridley engineering because the that several complaints of bad spots at various places of Fridley had been made to the various members of the committee. Chairman bat he Mould refer the complaints to the Public Works Department. WITH LUG3m, s , seconded by Weiss, that the committee take no action to make a relative to the nevfsnow tires until the State Highway Department ,ts tests. Chairman Larson declared the motion carrieda red to the committee in -which a complaint was made that the Southbound , River Road found it nearly impossible to gain access to the portion that permits a driver to go West on Highway 100. Sgt. Fritz :he problem is being studied and will be rectified by the State cent. Motion by Fritz, seconded by Bandel! that the letter from Mr. caning Box Company, be received, but that no action he taken pending action by the State Highway D.- partment. Chairman Larson declared lede tty Committee is %'.0st unhappy and critical with parts of the planning of the Interchange at Highway 100 and East River Road, ittee feels that it presents many safety hazards, C] T Y 07, Tc T"-'- :J.— 0L 1, 0 {. t7 j. j.�. `.V A R l MlE lY T Monthly Report December, 1964 This Mo. To Date his Mo. This Yr. Cleared Pending Last COMPLAINTS ADULT— Dome s d o 14 121 121 6 103 Assault 12 12 Drunk 1 6 6 Diso. Fondue,, 2 29 29 Liq, laws „ 9 9 F ireF.rms 1 3 3 Non Supt Res. Arr Other 15 329 329 56 958 i JUVENILE Assault 5 4 1 Drunk 1 1 Diso. Condue Liq Laws 21 21 Firearms 3 3 Res. Arr Runaway 2 36 35 1 Vandalism 6 212 189 23 200 Other 10; 154 154 17 235 Robbery 3 1 2 3 Burglary 3 80 49 31 5 59 Theft Over $50 11 138 53 85 21 328 Under $50 26 288 187 101 .Other 6 9 No '�D'88S 1, 1 Unit #17 • Uni t X21 Unit #22 Unit #23 ACCIDENTS Personal In j Prop Damage Fatal RADIO CALLS ASSISTANCE TO Motorists Other P.D. Fire Dept. Medical • TRAFFIC ARRESTS Speed D.U.I. Open Bottle Careless Drt ng Reckless Dr l ng DA Susp or' v DA other Stop Sign Parking Other q Gur s Others JA 3L Our Pris. Other Prise: 28 307 19 263 7 193 8 190 986.. 76.0 10.3 36.98 .038 6,518 811.3 802 338,70 0052 121 1207 10.0 183.45 1.51 69078 786.1 709 226.61 0031 To Date To Date This Mo. This Year Last Year Last Year 18 182 18 172 33 237 31 189 3 2 214 3064 255 3 ,v 106 40 386 61 390 7 124 11 168 3 44, 2 86 12 204 24 203 18 491 19 283 3 65 7 60 1 27 5 105 4 71 1 1 6 53 2 27 7 105 4 90 9 62 34 I�. 131 .. 10 68 5' 166 20 213 2 32 1 26 0 28 2 38 28 307 19 263 7 193 8 190 FUBUC ^TORS DEPU1,1,T CITY OF Fr-13)V FY MONTHLY REPORT 4. NoyEMHER 1964 0 STREETSs ........... 16 a 1 Hauling (70 hours). 2, (48 hours). 30 S iz with Chloride (13 hours). 4. Pa 124 hours), 50 C 38 hour. 6. Eq t Repairs ,Streets (1271 hours). 7. Time - Streets (34J hours). $, ous Street Work (83J hours). 90 Signs, Signals, and Markings (120 hours). AND T 1. • Ice Control (48J hours), 2, 3 Plonsing (109 hours). 3, Eq pment Repairs . Snow and Ice (70 hours), 4. llaneons Snow and Ice Work (18 hours). WATERS to and Sewer inspections (27J hours). 2, W Break (i� hours). 30 W r Meter Inspections and Repairs (521 hours). 4. Re and Collections (78 hours). 5. .use Work (49 hours). 60 F atian Plant Operation (871 hours). 70 t Repairs (71 hours), 80 V' Inspections and Repairs (46 hours). 90 S pipe Repairs (21 hours). 100 W main Tape (4 hours). 110 pment Repairs - Water (36 hours), 220 W r Turn —Ow (9 hours). 13. ellaneous Water Work (32J hours). SEWERS 10 t�' ary Sewer Cleaning (21 hours). 2. art' Sewer inspections (2 hours). 30 Station Inspections and Repairs (135 hours). 4. 1e Repairs (63 hours). 5o mei • �J 0 WATERt 8 F 7 2 7 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY OF FRIDLEY MONTHLY REPORT - DECEMBER 1964 Gravel Hauling (38 hours). Patching (23 hours). Equipment Repairs - Streets (162J hours). Shop Time - Street& (3.11,6 hours) . Miscellaneous Street Work (100 hours). Traffic Signs, Sigrialsp and Markings ( hours). Sanding - Ice Control (171j hours). Saar norori»g (251 bows), Miscellaneous Snow and Ice Work (14J hours). Equipment Repairs - Snow and Ioe (1 hours). Water and Sewer Inspections (13 hours), Watenudn Break (116j hours). Water Meter Inspections and Repairs (330 hours). Readings and CoUeotiour (54 hours). F ttiion Plant( Operation hours). Rydrant Repairs (41 hours). Valve Inspections and Repairs (27* hours). standpipe Repairs (5 hours) - Watermain Taps. (3 hours) - Equipment Repairs - water (39 hours)o Water Turn -Ons (27J hours). Miscellaneous Water Work (25J hours)o Sanitary Sewer Work (1j hours)* Sanitary Sewer Cleaning (328 hours). Sanitary Sewer Inspections and Repairs (6 hours). Lift Station Inspections and Repairs (1511 hours). Manhole Repairs (2 hours)* Equipment Repairs - Sewer (43j hours). Miscellaneous Sanitary Sewer Work (31 hours). Miscellaneous Storm Sewer Work (5 hours)* Citir Hall (8 hours)* 81 wring Department (12 hours). 9* Firm Department (3* hours)* 10- Lfgpw store (6 hours) . P Department (211 hours). Police Department (1 hour). Project #67 46 hours), Sick Leave (26 hoar&)* Vacation (32 hours)& Holidays (220 hours)e